alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Bremen, Ross A. [mailto:RBremen@nepc.com] 

Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 10:21 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Lifetime Income Joint Hearing

August 16, 2010

Via E-mail: e-ORI@dol.gov

Office of Regulations and Interpretations

Employee Benefits Security Administration

Room N-5655

U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

Attention: Lifetime Income Joint Hearing

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

NEPC respectfully requests the opportunity to participate in the 

Lifetime Income Joint Hearing conducted by the U.S. Department of 

Labor, Internal Revenue Service, and Department of the Treasury.

NEPC has been providing investment consulting services for traditional 

and alternative assets for over twenty-four years and is one of the 

largest investment consulting firms in the country. NEPC consults to 

over 100 defined contribution programs, with total assets in excess of 

$70 billion accumulated by over 1 million participants. NEPC does not 

offer investment products, and our investment advice and 

recommendations are unbiased and without conflict. We accept our 

role as a fiduciary and serve the singular interest of plan sponsors and 

the participants they represent. NEPC is frequently requested to speak 

at industry conferences on the topic of income solution products. Ross 

Bremen, CFA, Partner in the Defined Contribution Practice, will testify 

on behalf of NEPC.

NEPC’s testimony will focus on plan sponsor safe harbor considerations 

and how changes to the safe harbor provisions would promote 
innovation and alleviate sponsor concern when selecting a lifetime 

income option. NEPC will support its testimony with findings from our 

annual Plan and Fee Survey which provides us with a great deal of 

insight on sponsor adoption of plan features after regulatory safe 

harbors were provided.

Thank you for consideration of our request.

Sincerely,

Ross A. Bremen, CFA

Partner
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 96-4693 DAVID COVINGTON, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CR-96-112-A) Submitted: March 25, 1997 Decided: April 28, 1997 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Gregory B. English, ENGLISH & SMITH, Alexandria, Virginia, forAppellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Henry L. Thaggert, III, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION PER CURIAM: David Covington appeals his conviction for conspiring to possesswith the intent to distribute and to distribute heroin, aiding and abetting the introduction of heroin into a penal institution, and use of a communication facility to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1994), D.C. Code Ann. § 22-2603 (1981), 18 U.S.C. § 2 (1994), and 21 U.S.C. § 843(b) (1994). We affirm. Covington contends that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support the conspiracy conviction. The government must show two elements in a conspiracy case: (1) an agreement between two or more persons, and (2) an intent to achieve a certain objective through unlawful means. See United States v. Burgos , 94 F.3d 849, 857 (4th Cir. 1996) (en banc), cert. denied , 65 U.S.L.W. 3586 (U.S. Feb. 24, 1997) (No. 96-6868). We must affirm Covington's conviction "if there is substantial evidence, taking the view most favorable to the Government, to support it." Glasser v. United States , 315 U.S. 60, 80 (1942).Viewed in the light most favorable to the Government, the evidence at trial showed that Covington made arrangements with an unnamed person to deliver heroin to his girlfriend, who then delivered the heroin to Covington in Lorton Reformatory. Further testimony established that the amount of heroin delivered was of a distribution amount in the prison setting. Further, the heroin was divided into seven individual packets. Finally, Covington made calls to several people to arrange for drugs to be brought to his girlfriend, who would then deliver the drugs to him. Viewing this evidence in the light most favorable to the Government, it is sufficient to sustain a conviction for conspiracy.Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                 PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                     444,639
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                         0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         67,045
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                      102,713
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  1,547
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                615,944
<COMMON>                                        5,848
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                     102,817
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            51,433
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                160,098
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          35,000
<PREFERRED>                                     2,224
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                          178,003
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             28,600
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                           0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                      0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   8,876
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                           0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                         0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                203,143
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                 615,944
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                     235,006
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            7,113
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    201,633
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    208,746
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        26,260
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  0
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 26,260
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       13,544
<NET-INCOME>                                   12,716
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     1,330
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  11,386
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       11,475
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      11,297
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         31,905
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    4.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    4.87
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2
   6.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CCFNB Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2008.7.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report.8.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;9.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (e)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(f)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(g)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(h)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
 10.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: March 10, 2009
    /s/ Jeffrey T. ArnoldJeffrey T. ArnoldChief Financial  Officer
and Treasurer 74
Docket: EBSA-2010-0007 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in 

Retirement Plans 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0007-0001 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options 

Document: EBSA-2010-0007-DRAFT-0076 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: Parker J Arendell 

Address: 

P.O.Box 262 

Brighton, IL, 

General Comment 

I think the government should NOT be allowed to mess with my 'private' 401k. Maybe they should cut 

spending instead of looking for ways to increase revenue. And I mean real cuts. Start with the 

Department of Education and move onto the Department of Agriculture. While you're at it, you might as 

well come clean with the FICA 'tax' and tell the truth, that there is no money for social security. I want 

the government to focus on their role as defined by the Constitution. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: April 23, 2010 

Received: April 21, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80adcbbe 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=Print&PrintId=0900006480adcb... 4/23/2010
----

(2004/C 84 E/0304)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3876/03

by Francesco Fiori (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(16 December 2003)

Subject:   Exceeding of the basic cultivation areas for 2003 and application of penalties

With regard to the problems of maize production and the exceeding of the basic cultivation area for 2003, with the consequent application of penalties, and also in the light of the communication by Agea (Italy) on the expected 18,6 % reduction in the CAP premium arising from the imposition of a ceiling on the area reserved for maize — even though Italy's maximum guaranteed area has not been exceeded — it is now essential, as a matter of urgency, to ask the Commission to rescind the (at all events exceptional) penalties.

The drought of 2003 has taken its toll in considerably higher production costs (as much as 32 % higher than previous years), especially for irrigation, as well as in a marked fall in average production, serving to confirm the significant reduction in maize producers' incomes.

The situation of maize producers is already highly vulnerable, and could become disastrous if further unplanned events (classifiable as force majeure) occur to compound the effects of the expected 18,6 % cut.

What action will the Commission take to restore equilibrium in the maize-producing areas?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(5 February 2004)

Concerning the request, not to apply — as an exceptional derogation for 2003 — the aid reductions per hectare (ha) caused by an excess production of the separate base area for maize in Italy, it is to be noted that the aim of the measures established in Article 2, paragraph 4 of Council Regulation (EC) 1251/1999 of 17 May 1999 establishing a support system for producers of certain arable crops (1), is to ensure market balance.

The global sum of the payments distributed to farmers under the arable crop scheme is not reduced if the area payment per ha is decreased due to an excess in the separate base area for maize in Italy but the eligible area per farmer is reduced proportionately for all the payments granted.

Finally, regarding a possible action of the Commission in order to redress the balance of the situation of the maize areas, Member States determine the regional base areas (Article 2, § 2 of Council Regulation (EC) 1251/1999) and have the possibility of modifying their regionalisation plan.

Concerning the bad weather conditions of the summer of 2003, which penalised farmers in Italy, it is to be noted that the Commission urgently adopted a package of measures, in order to help farmers to overcome the exceptional drought.

Due to these considerations, a derogation to the above-mentioned Regulation, because of exceptional events like this summer's drought, is not appropriate.

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999.

----
#### Anton Stadler, Respondent, v. Hiram Burchard, Appellant.

Judgment oi the County Court and that of the justice reversed. Opinion by

Barker, J.
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Comments on the Interagency Science Consultation Draft IRIS 

Assessment of RDX (dated September 2014)

Date: October 28, 2014

_____________________________________________________________________________________

The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) appreciates the opportunity to review and comment on the 

draft Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) assessment of RDX. The assessment is clearly written and 

the analyses appear to be scientifically sound. 

I do not have any substantive comments on the content of this assessment. The derivation of the overall 

oral reference dose (RfD) based on nervous system effects (specifically convulsions) seems appropriate. 

Likewise, the derivation of the oral slope factor seems appropriate. I also agree with EPA’s conclusion 

that the database for RDX provides “suggestive evidence of carcinogenic potential” by all routes of 

exposure. 

Thank you again for the opportunity to review this assessment. I look forward to the interagency 

discussion.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.37 MB)
 
 Local forces in Iraq and Syria are pressuring the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant at multiple p restricting the terrorist army’s mobility and options the Operation Inherent Resolve spokesman said Wednesday.
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
**EXHIBIT
      32.02**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Colonial Commercial Corp.
      (the
“Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William
      Salek, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section
      18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and
                15(d)
                ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





By:
            /s/
                William Salek





Name:
            William
                SalekChief
                Financial Officer





March
      30,
      2006
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Access to InformationAccessibility (for Disabled)Change StrategiesComputer NetworksDisabilitiesInformation NetworksInformation SourcesInformation TechnologyInternetTechnological Advancement

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
#### James H. Cushing, Respondent, *v.*United Traction Company, Appellant.

*Cushing*v. *United Traction Co.,*140 App. Div. 942, affirmed.

(Argued May 10, 1912;

decided May 24, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 22, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through the negligence of defendant.

*Lewis E. Carr*and *Patrick C. Dugan*for appellant.

*Thomas S. Fagan*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1026 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1026

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
          the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two

                                 An Act

 
To designate the United States Post Office located at 60 Third Avenue in 
   Long Branch, New Jersey, as the ``Pat King Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PAT KING POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    The United States Post Office located at 60 Third Avenue in Long 
Branch, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as the ``Pat King 
Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States Post Office referred 
to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Pat King Post 
Office Building.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
TOTAL ENTERTAINMENT RESTAURANT CORP.
                      REPORT ON FORM 10Q September 7, 2004

                  CERTIFICATION BY JAMES K. ZIELKE PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned, Chief Financial Officer of Total Entertainment Restaurant
Corp. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to the best of my knowledge, that the
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 7, 2004 (the "Periodic
Report") accompanying this certification fully complies with the requirements of
the Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



     Date October 21, 2004                /s/ James K. Zielke
         ------------------               ---------------------
                                          James K. Zielke
                                          Chief Financial Officer,
                                          Secretary and Treasurer


EXHIBIT 32.2