Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce International Trade Administration [A-580-902]
 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
 SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 
                        ( print page 60930)
                        determines that sales of utility scale wind towers (wind towers) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) were made at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) August 1, 2021, through July 31, 2022. We also preliminarily determine that two companies had no shipments. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.
 DATES: Applicable September 6, 2023.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Adam Simons, AD/CVD Operations, Office IX, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6172.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Background On October 11, 2022, based on timely requests for review, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated an administrative review of the antidumping duty order [1]
                    
                     on wind towers from Korea.[2]
                    
                     This review covers 15 producers/exporters of the subject merchandise. In April 2023, we extended the deadline for issuing the preliminary results of this review to no later than August 31, 2023.[3]
                    
                     For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this review, 
                    *see*
                     the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.[4] Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the 
                    *Order*
                     is wind towers.[5]
                    
                     The product is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheading 7308.20.0020 or 8502.31.0000 and may also be classified under HTSUS subheading 7308.20.0020 or 8502.31.0000. While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description remains dispositive. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments On October 28 and November 10, 2022, respectively, we received letters from Hyosung Heavy Industries Corporation (Hyosung) and CS Wind Corporation (CS Wind), timely notifying Commerce that they had no exports, sales, or entries of subject merchandise during the POR.[6]
                    
                     Based on their certifications and our analysis of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) information, we preliminarily determine that CS Wind and Hyosung had no shipments during the POR. Consistent with our practice, we are not rescinding the review with respect to CS Wind and Hyosung. Instead, we will complete the review and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of this review.[7] Methodology Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. NV is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, 
                    *see*
                     the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at 
                    *https://access.trade.gov.*
                     In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at 
                    *https://access.trade.gov/​public/​FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.*
                     A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached in Appendix I of this notice. Preliminary Results of Review As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine the following estimated weighted-average dumping margin for the period August 1, 2021, through July 31, 2022: Producer/exporter
Weighted-
                             average dumping  
                             margin 
                             (percent)Dongkuk S&C Co., Ltd
1.95Companies Not Selected for Individual Review
1.95
 Rate for Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination The Act and Commerce's regulations do not address the establishment of a weighted-average dumping margin to be applied to companies not selected for individual examination when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, for guidance when calculating the weighted-average dumping margin for companies which were not selected for individual examination in an administrative review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually examined, excluding rates that are zero, 
                    *de minimis*
                     (
                    *i.e.,*
                     less than 0.5 percent), or determined entirely on the basis of facts available. For these preliminary results, we have preliminary assigned a dumping margin to these companies based on the rate calculated for Dongkuk S&C Co., Ltd. (Dongkuk). The companies not selected for individual review are listed in Appendix II. Disclosure and Public Comment Commerce intends to disclose the calculations performed in connection with these preliminary results to interested parties within five days after the date of publication of this notice in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    .[8]
                    
                     Interested parties may submit case briefs or other written comments to Commerce no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.[9]
                    
                     Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed no later than seven days after the time limit 
                    ( print page 60931)
                    for filing case briefs.[10]
                    
                     Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) a statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.[11]
                    
                     Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using ACCESS.[12]
                    
                     An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the established deadline. Note that Commerce has temporarily modified certain of its requirements for serving documents containing business proprietary information, until further notice.[13] Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.[14]
                    
                     Hearing requests should contain: (1) the party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Oral presentations at the hearing will be limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the time and date for the hearing.[15] Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, unless otherwise extended.[16] Assessment Rates Upon issuing the final results, Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), because Dongkuk reported the entered value of its U.S. sales, we calculated importer-specific 
                    *ad valorem*
                     duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of those sales. Where either the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or 
                    *de minimis*
                     within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific rate is zero or 
                    *de minimis,*
                     we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. Commerce's “automatic assessment” practice will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Dongkuk for which Dongkuk did not know that the merchandise it sold to the intermediary (
                    *e.g.,*
                     a reseller, trading company, or exporter) was destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. For the companies which were not selected for individual examination, we intend to assign an antidumping duty assessment rate equal to the dumping margin calculated in the final results of this review for Dongkuk. Further, if we continue to find in the final results that CS Wind and Hyosung had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR, we will instruct CBP to liquidate any suspended entries that entered under their antidumping duty case numbers (
                    *i.e.,*
                     at that exporter's rate) at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, the final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (
                    *i.e.,*
                     within 90 days of publication). Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for the company listed above will be that established in the final results of this review, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, 
                    *de minimis*
                     within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed companies not covered in this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific cash deposit rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the company participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, or the LTFV investigation, but the manufacturer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent segment for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 5.41 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation.[17]
                    
                     These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: August 29, 2023. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
 Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the 
                        *Order* IV. Discussion of the Methodology V. Recommendation Appendix II—Review-Specific Rate Applicable to Companies Not Selected for Individual Review 1. CS Wind China Co., Ltd. 2. CS Wind Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. 3. CS Wind Taiwan Ltd. 4. CS Wind Turkey Kule Imalati A.S. 5. CS Wind UK Limited 6. CS Wind Vietnam Co., Ltd. 7. Enercon Korea Inc. 8. GE Renewable Energy
                        ( print page 60932) 9. Nordex SE 10. Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy Limited 11. Vestas Korea 12. Vestas Korea Wind Technology Ltd.


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         
                        *See Utility Scale Wind Towers from Canada, Indonesia, the Republic of Korea, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty Orders,*85 FR 52546, 52547 (August 26, 2020) (
                        *Order*). Back to Citation
 2.
    
                         
                        *See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews,*87 FR 61278 (October 11, 2022). Back to Citation
 3.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,” dated April 6, 2023. Back to Citation
 4.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the 2021-2022 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Utility Scale Wind Towers from Korea,” dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). Back to Citation
 5.
    
                         For a complete description of the scope of the 
                        *Order, see*
                         Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 2-3. Back to Citation
 6.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Hyosung's Letter, “No Shipment Letter,” dated October 28, 2022; 
                        *see also*
                         CS Wind's Letter, “Notice of No Sales,” dated November 10, 2022. Back to Citation
 7.
    
                         
                        *See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2012-2013,*79 FR 15951, 15952 (March 24, 2014), unchanged in 
                        *Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of No Shipments, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2012-2013,*79 FR 51306 (August 28, 2014); and 
                        *Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,*75 FR 26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in 
                        *Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,*75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010). Back to Citation
 8.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.224(b). Back to Citation
 9.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.309(c). Back to Citation
 10.
    
                         Commerce is exercising its discretion, under 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1), to alter the time limit for filing of rebuttal briefs. Back to Citation
 11.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). Back to Citation
 12.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.303. Back to Citation
 13.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.309; 
                        *see also*19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements); and 
                        *Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID-19; Extension of Effective Period,*85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). Back to Citation
 14.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.310(c). Back to Citation
 15.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.310(d). Back to Citation
 16.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1). Back to Citation
 17.
    
                         
                        *See Order,*
                         85 FR at 52547. Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2023-19121 Filed 9-5-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P