alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1038

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to improve access to taxexempt debt for small nonprofit health care and educational institutions.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 14, 2001

Mr. JEFFORDS (for himself and Mr. LEAHY) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to improve

access to tax-exempt debt for small nonprofit health care

and educational institutions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health and Higher

5 Education Facilities Improvement Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. IMPROVED ACCESS TO TAX-EXEMPT DEBT FOR

7 SMALL NONPROFIT HEALTH CARE AND EDU8 CATIONAL INSTITUTIONS.

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 265(b)(3) of the Internal

10 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to exception for certain
2

•S 1038 IS

1 tax-exempt obligations) is amended by adding at the end

2 the following:

3 ‘‘(G) ELECTION TO APPLY LIMITATION ON

4 AMOUNT OF OBLIGATIONS AT BORROWER

5 LEVEL.—

6 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—An issuer, the

7 proceeds of the obligations of which are to

8 be used to make or finance eligible loans,

9 may elect to apply subparagraphs (C) and

10 (D) by treating each borrower as the issuer

11 of a separate issue.

12 ‘‘(ii) ELIGIBLE LOAN.—For purposes

13 of this subparagraph—

14 ‘‘(I) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘el15 igible loan’ means 1 or more loans to

16 a qualified borrower the proceeds of

17 which are used by the borrower for

18 health care or educational purposes

19 and the aggregate amount of which

20 issued during any calendar year does

21 not exceed $10,000,000.

22 ‘‘(II) QUALIFIED BORROWER.—

23 The term ‘qualified borrower’ means a

24 borrower which is an organization de25 scribed in section 501(c)(3) and ex-
3

•S 1038 IS

1 empt from taxation under section

2 501(a).

3 ‘‘(iii) MANNER OF ELECTION.—The

4 election described in clause (i) may be

5 made by an issuer for any calendar year at

6 any time prior to its first issuance during

7 such year of obligations the proceeds of

8 which will be used to make or finance 1 or

9 more eligible loans.

10 ‘‘(iv) MODIFICATION OF RULE FOR

11 COMPOSITE ISSUES.—In the case of an ob12 ligation which is issued by any issuer

13 which has made the election described in

14 clause (i), subparagraph (F) shall be ap15 plied without regard to clause (i) of such

16 subparagraph.’’.

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

18 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after

19 December 31, 2001.

Æ
#### In the Matter of the Amity Insurance Company.

— Petition granted. Opinion

*Per Curiam.*
---

---

Exhibit 23.5

CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8, (File
No. 333-61895, File No. 333-55970) and Forms S-3, (File No. 333-140968,
File No. 333-1406969 and File No. 333-140974) of our report dated March 22,
2007 relating to the financial statements of Coral World International, Ltd. which appears
in this Form 10-K of Ampal-American Israel Corporation.

Fahn Kanne & Co. CPAs
(ISR)

Tel-Aviv, IsraelMarch 3,
2009



---

---
Exhibit 23.1

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-98325, 333-120561, 333-161376, 333-177890, 333-204379, 333-230157, and 333-231666) of CommunicationsSystems, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated March 17, 2020, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appearson page 27 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

/s/ Baker Tilly Virchow Krause,LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota

March 17, 2020

 

59
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.79 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
TOTAL ENTERTAINMENT RESTAURANT CORP.
                      REPORT ON FORM 10Q SEPTEMBER 9, 2003

                  CERTIFICATION BY JAMES K. ZIELKE PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned, Chief Financial Officer of Total Entertainment Restaurant
Corp. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to the best of my knowledge, that the
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 9, 2003 (the "Periodic
Report") accompanying this certification fully complies with the requirements of
the Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



     Date   October 22, 2003                    /s/ JAMES K. ZIELKE
          ---------------------                 --------------------------------
                                                James K. Zielke
                                                Chief Financial Officer,
                                                Secretary and Treasurer


EXHIBIT 32.2
Page 1 of 1

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION A 5
HeeCatONa RecuLATIONS 90 1/8 4/2 /O

BRANCH AUG 2 7 2010

As of: August 26, 2010

PUBLIC Status: Posted

Posted: August 26, 2010
SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0475
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: David Geise
Address:

Coldwater, OH, 45828
Email: davedc20@bright.net

General Comment

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

http://fdms.erulemaking net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/26/2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          30,895
<SECURITIES>                                     3,507
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,181
<ALLOWANCES>                                       799
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,951
<PP&E>                                          10,223
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,078
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,333
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,645
<BONDS>                                          9,680
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,789
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           138
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,851
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   129,333
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,786
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,784
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,637
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 810
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,301
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,867
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,434
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,434
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00196-CR

Martin SANTA CRUZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of 

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR2364

Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 4, 2014

DISMISSED

The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain 

case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, 

and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and 

agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately reflects that the 

underlying case is a plea-bargain case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). 

Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “The appeal must be 

dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part 
04-14-00196-CR

of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). On April 29, 2014, we ordered that this 

appeal would be dismissed pursuant to rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification 

showing that the appellant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record by May 

27, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 2005); Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.). 

Appellant’s counsel has filed a written response agreeing that this court has no jurisdiction 

in this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 177 

(Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.). In light of the record presented, Rule 25.2(d) requires 

this court to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

- 2 -
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 99

LETTER OF QUALITY ASSURANCE BY ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen") has represented to CT Communications, Inc. that
the audits they performed on the 10 RSA Cellular General Partnerships invested
in by Palmetto MobileNet, L.P. were subject to Andersen's quality control system
for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance
that the engagements were conducted in compliance with professional standards
and that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on the
audits and availability of national office consultation. Availability of
personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen was not relevant to the audit and,
thus, CT Communications received no assurance from Andersen regarding such
availability.

 /s/ CT Communications, Inc.

Concord North Carolina
March 28, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 568 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                       October 3, 2002.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the joint 
resolution (H.J. Res. 112) making further continuing appropriations for the 
fiscal year 2003, and for other purposes. The joint resolution shall be 
considered as read for amendment. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the joint resolution to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) one hour of debate on the joint resolution equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 537 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 537

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the President 
   of the United States should establish a nonpartisan Presidential 
        Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2002

  Mr. Shays (for himself and Mrs. McCarthy of New York) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the President 
   of the United States should establish a nonpartisan Presidential 
        Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States.

Whereas on September 11, 2001, the United States suffered the most devastating 
        terrorist attacks in its history;
Whereas the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, and 
        the crash of United Airlines Flight 93, resulted in the senseless deaths 
        of nearly 3,000 individuals;
Whereas all Americans, but particularly the families of the many victims, need 
        to better understand the causes relating to the terrorist attacks of 
        September 11, 2001; and
Whereas a full investigation of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks is 
        necessary to effectively prevent future terrorist attacks: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives urges the President of 
the United States to establish a nonpartisan Presidential Commission on 
Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States to--
            (1) examine and report upon the facts and causes relating 
        to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001;
            (2) ascertain, evaluate, and report on the evidence 
        developed by all relevant governmental agencies regarding the 
        facts and circumstances surrounding the attacks;
            (3) make a full and complete accounting of the 
        circumstances surrounding the attacks, and the extent of the 
        United States' preparedness for, and response to, the attacks; 
        and
            (4) investigate and report to the President and the 
        Congress on its findings, conclusions, and recommendations for 
        corrective measures that can be taken to prevent acts of 
        terrorism.
                                 <all>
```
```
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 188 (Thursday, September 27, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 59339]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [http://www.gpo.gov/]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23901]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System

48 CFR Part 205

Publicizing Contract Actions

CFR Correction

205.470  [Corrected]

    In Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 2 (Parts 
201--299), revised as of October 1, 2011, on page 38, in section 
205.470, the first sentence is corrected by removing ``$1,000,000,000'' 
and adding, in its place, ``$1,000,000''.

[FR Doc. 2012-23901 Filed 9-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
#### Theodore P. Gilman, Appellant, v. Joseph Byrnes, Respondent.

— Order modified as directed in opinion, without costs to either party. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
<Page>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                              ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
ZYGO CORPORATION:

    We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
No. 333-44333, No. 33-62087, No. 33-57060, No. 33-20880, and No. 33-34619 on
Forms S-8 of Zygo Corporation of our reports dated August 18, 2003, with respect
to the consolidated balance sheets of Zygo Corporation and subsidiaries as of
June 30, 2003 and 2002 and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows and related schedule for each of the years
in the three-year period ended June 30, 2003, which reports appear in or are
incorporated by reference into the June 30, 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Zygo Corporation. Our report refers to a change in the method of accounting for
the disposal of long-lived assets effective July 1, 2002 in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, 'Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.'

KPMG LLP

Hartford, Connecticut
September 23, 2003
#### Alexander Buderus, Plaintiff, v. Henry Immen, Defendant.

Judgment ordered for plaintiff, with costs. Opinion

*Per Curiam.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         105,699
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               141,105
<PP&E>                                           3,572
<DEPRECIATION>                                     637
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 128,634
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,888
<OTHER-SE>                                     110,746
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   128,634
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,781
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,802
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,021)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,021)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Colonial
  Commercial Corp. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001
  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
  "Report"), I, James W. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
  certify, pursuant to section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section
  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)       the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

  By: /S/ JAMES W. STEWART
  ------------------------
  Name:  JAMES W. STEWART
  Chief Financial Officer

  November 14, 2003







<PAGE>
----

Removal from the register of Case T-184/03 (1)

(2004/C 106/179)

(Language of the case: Spanish)

By order of 2 March 2004, the President of the Fourth Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case T-184/03: Metrovacesa, S.A. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

----

(1)OJ C 184 of 2.8.2003.

----