alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
June 15, 2015

Mr. Kipp Hoffman

412 Stanford Street Brush, CO 80723

Dear Mr. Hoffman:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your June 4, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015- 2104), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Page 1 of 1
8 eck REc- NPd/2-/0

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION

PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS
— BRARCH As of: September 08, 2010

PUBLIC Status: Posted

posted: Septet Oe 10
A) U B M I SSI Oo N Comments Due: August 16, 2010}

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010°
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0844
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

—
Submitter Information

Name: Barbara J Beck
Address:

8045 Emerald Ave NE

Canton, OH, 44721
Email: bjbeck6591@neo.rr.com
Government Agency Type: Federal
Government Agency: HRSA

—
General Comment

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-20:.0-

0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

Thank you for your attention.

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 9/8/2010
AMENDMENT TO BJ'S WHOLESALE CLUB INC. CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE BENEFIT PLAN



 Exhibit 10.20a 
  
 BJ’S WHOLESALE CLUB, INC. 
 Change of Control Severance Benefit Plan 
 for Key Employees, as Amended 
  
 AMENDMENT 
  
 Pursuant to the right reserved to BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (the
“Company”) in Section 7 of the BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. Change of Control Severance Benefit Plan for Key Employees, as Amended through January 11, 2000 (the “Plan”), the Board of Directors of the Company has authorized the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company to amend the Plan. Pursuant to the authority granted by the Board of Directors, Frank D. Forward, Chief Financial Officer, hereby amends the Plan by adopting the amendment set forth below, as follows:

  
 Exhibit B, Determination of Benefits Following a Qualified Termination, shall
be amended by replacing it with the following: 
  
 EXHIBIT B

 (as amended through February 4, 2004) 
  

Determination of Benefits Following a Qualified Termination  
  
 The “Applicable Number of Weeks” with respect to a Participant is as follows: 
  

					
	 If the Participant’s title immediately
 prior to the Change of Control is...
	  	The Applicable Number of Weeks is...
		
	 Senior Vice President
	  	104 weeks
		
	 Vice President
	  	78 weeks
		
	 Assistant Vice President or Regional
 Manager
	  	65 weeks
			
	 Manager of, Buyer, Other
	  	Years of Service	  	# of weeks
	 Manager or Staff Grades 27-32
	  	     Less than 10
	  	45 weeks
	 	  	             10
	  	46 weeks
	 	  	             11
	  	50 weeks
	 	  	             12
	  	54 weeks
	 	  	     13 or more
	  	58 weeks
			
	 Other Home Office Team Members
	  	Years of Service	  	# of weeks
	 	  	     Less than 2
	  	4 weeks
	 	  	     2 or more
	  	 4 weeks + (years of service – 1) x (2)
 (up
to a maximum of 26 weeks)


  
 * * * * * *

  









 This Amendment to the BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. Change of Control Severance Benefit Plan for Key Employees is
executed on behalf of the Company this 4th day of February, 2004. 
  

			
	 BJ’S WHOLESALE CLUB, INC.

	
	 /s/    Frank D. Forward        


	 Frank D. Forward,
 Chief Financial
Officer
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 165 (Monday, August 28, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58577-58578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18528]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 15229-000]


Alabama Power Company; Notice of Surrender of Preliminary Permit

    Take notice that Alabama Power Company, permittee for the proposed 
Chandler Mountain Pumped Storage Project No. 15229, has requested that 
its preliminary permit be terminated. The permit was issued on March 
24, 2022 \1\ and would have expired on February 28, 2026. The project 
would have been located on Little Canoe Creek, Gulf Creek, and Jake 
Creek near the town of

[[Page 58578]]

Steele, in Etowah and St. Clair Counties, Alabama.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 178 FERC ] 61,209 (2022).
    \2\ Little Canoe Creek, Gulf Creek, and Jake Creek are 
tributaries of the Coosa River.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The preliminary permit for Project No. 15229 will remain in effect 
until the close of business, September 21, 2023. But, if the Commission 
is closed on this day, then the permit remains in effect until the 
close of business on the next day in which the Commission is open.\3\ 
New applications for this site may not be submitted until after the 
permit surrender is effective.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 18 CFR 385.2007(a)(2) (2022).

    Dated: August 22, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-18528 Filed 8-25-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

We, Julin Mao - Chief Executive Officer and Dexter Fong - Chief Financial Officer, of Pacific
Systems Control Technology Inc.
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of our knowledge:

1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 14, 2003

/s/ Julin Mao
Julin Mao
Chief Executive Officer
and/s/ Dexter Fong
Dexter Fong
Chief Financial Officer

---
Order Granting Appellee’s Second Unopposed Motion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

INGE and MARK CAHILL, RANDY 

and KERIN GAYNER, WILLIAM 

and NANNETTE REED, and 

IRVING ERICKSON,

 Petitioners and Appellants,

v.

CITY OF COLUMBIA FALLS, 

COLUMBIA FALLS BOARD OF 

ADJUSTMENT,

 Respondents and Appellees,

CNS PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT, 

LLC, a Montana Limited Liability 

Company,

 Respondent.

Cause No. DA-22-0395

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellees’ motion for extension to file the response 

brief, and good cause appearing,

Appellees are granted an extension of time until November 30, 2022, to 

prepare, file, and serve the response brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 18 2022

11/18/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0395
#### The New England Mutual Life Insurance Company, Respondent, v. Phillipena Keller, Appellant, Impleaded, etc.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
1 of 1

EPA’s Potential Reinterpretation of the Clean Water Act TAS Provision

– Meeting with the

National Tribal Caucus (NTC) of the EPA National Tribal Operations Committee (NTOC) Wednesday

, June 24

, 2015 Meeting Summary

EPA Presenter : Elizabeth Southerland, Director, EPA Office of Science and Technology Participants: Approximately 2 0 members of the Caucus

The potential reinterpretation of the tribal authority provision of the Clean Water Act was one of several on the agenda. Two documents that were made available to participants at the meeting are available in the docket for this rulemaking:

 Clean Water Act Tribal Provision: Overview, p repared by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water and Office of General Coun sel, May 2015.

 Clean Water Act Tribal Provision: Discussion Paper, p repared by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water and Office of General Counsel, May

2015.

Elizabeth Southerland provided a brief overview of the potential action.

Sev eral participants expressed their support for the action. Participants raised n o questions or

issues.
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case No. COMP/M.3482-Electra / Englefield / GSL)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2004/C 149/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

(2)OJ C 217, 29.7.2000, p. 32; Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 has been replaced by Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

----
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

                              Certification of CEO and CFO

**                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**                                 As Adopted Pursuant to**

**                      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form10-K of National Housing Partnership Realty Fund I (the "Partnership"), for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as theequivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B.Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership,each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of hisknowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

 

 

This certification is furnished with thisReport pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall notbe deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended.
NAVCENT Expands Unmanned Integration, Operates Saildrone in Arabian Gulf
 
  By U.S. Naval Forces Central Command Public Affairs
  U.S. Naval Forces Central Command (NAVCENT) began operating the Saildrone Explorer unmanned surface vessel (USV) in the Arabian Gulf, Jan. 27, expanding U.S. 5th Fleet’s integration of new unmanned systems.  Task Force 59, NAVCENT’s dedicated staff for new unmanned systems and artificial intelligence discovery, initiated Saildrone operational testing off the coast of Bahrain one month after launching the a Saildron in the Gulf of Aqaba.  “The initial Saildrone assessment phase at sea in the Gulf of Aqaba has exceeded our expectations,” said Cmdr. Thomas McAndrew, the task force’s deputy commander. “We are applying the results and rapidly expanding operations.”  The Saildrone launched in the Gulf of Aqaba on Dec. 12, successfully operated at sea continuously for more than 30 days, demonstrating persistence in a dynamic maritime environment.  The Saildrone Explorer is a 23-foot-long, 16-foot-tall USV reliant on wind power for propulsion. The vessel houses a package of sensors powered through solar energy for building a shared picture of the surrounding seas.  Last September, NAVCENT established Task Force 59 in Bahrain where it is headquartered. The task force has since commenced at-sea evaluations of new Mantas T-12 and Devil Ray T-38 USVs off the coast of Bahrain before International Maritime Exercise (IMX) 2022 in February. IMX is slated to include unmanned systems from partner nations, which will make it the largest unmanned exercise in world.  “The interest and support from our partners has grown exponentially as we collectively learn from operational testing,” said McAndrew. “We are mutually benefiting from these systems, and the creativity and new use cases can only come from our experience in the water.”  Ongoing evaluations of new unmanned systems in U.S. 5th Fleet help drive discovery, innovation and fleet integration. The U.S. Navy is learning important lessons that will inform future operational employment.  The Middle East region's unique geography, climate, and strategic importance offer an ideal environment for unmanned innovation through multilateral collaboration. The area includes the world's largest standing maritime partnership called Combined Maritime Forces as well as key waterways vital to global commerce.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF STAFF LEASING, INC. FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 INCLUDED IN FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>


<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                         SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                    36,582
<SECURITIES>                                              59,746
<RECEIVABLES>                                             64,283
<ALLOWANCES>                                               1,006
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         165,425
<PP&E>                                                    47,591
<DEPRECIATION>                                            22,690
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           206,046
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    127,193
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                     211
<OTHER-SE>                                                77,269
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             206,046
<SALES>                                                2,294,802
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       2,294,802
<CGS>                                                  2,223,091
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          2,223,091
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          75,407
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             350
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             1
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (1,606)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               (602)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (1,004)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (1,004)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              (.05)



</TABLE>
AugustlO, 2010 

" 

-Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 


Department ofHealth and Human Services 


Attention: OCII0-999I-IFC 


P.O. Box 8016 


Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 


Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Pr,~~~~o?~~~~~g~1:f,le fare Act t.. """. 

Below ar~ my comments regarding the Interim Final-Rule for-tkotJP1HBalmPlans' and Health 

Insurance Coverage Relating to Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Urtder the Patient 

r..Pr()tection~Affordable'CareA'Ct(pPA6A):--- ~~ ~ ... ;o_o~_~.~ -­

'", • r'/ f 

, . I ~f . m1r::tT H.cr,nUi ~~:; (11i'~·~, • ,­ ;0 ".'J v,.. ,.. ,'", " ~,,~~"!1J !I"i--' .""~ I. . 

I believe th~fevery effort should be made to increase tlie'numeer bfiniiividhals covered by 

PPACA, especially as ofJanuary 1,2014 when most ofthe reform components (Insurance 

Exchanges, Subsidies, Tax Credits, etc.) come into play. . •.... {lOf.qnl'· 

~.wgiif; ~ 

The average consumer has a broad definition of "benefits." Consumers view their health plan 

beyond the covered benefits, cost sharing, and the contribution levels associated with the plan. 

It is my opinion that the Rule may still result in some confusion to the marketplace in its 

application. For example, ifan employer raised the copayment level beyond the maximum in one 

area (i.e. outpatient services) but retained the copayment level for primary care doctor visits, -, ,does that mean a loss of grandfather status? Clarity will be critical both for the employer and the 

employee. 

Even by the most optimistic estimates, a substantial portion ofthe employee population will 

remain outside the PPACA as ofJanuary 2014 based on the current rules. While I understand the 

difficulty involved in making change, creating another large sub-population of excluded 

individuals will only add to costs, increase confusion, and mitigate the potential impact ofthe 

legislation. 

;~~~ulelleeds--to-ue-cleat;-reasonabt~'WitifntnltI1titgliitiertrrvtrlvecttrF'deterfIlititttg-wlretn-er'"'---------~~---.... 

a group health plan is "in or out." The decisions the federal government makes today will 

determine the outcomes for tomorrow. We may need to make some difficult decisions to create 

a sustainable health care system that will support a growing economy in the future. That means 

getting as many citizens across the country participating at the beginning to make it work and 

delivering on its promises to retain their support. 

Thjmk you for the opportunity to comment on this regulation . 

...-b~. Steven McMahon, D.C!f~ 231 W. 21st St ­

New York, NY 10011
#### William A. Greenfield et al., Respondents, *v.*Abe Brody et al., Appellants.

(Submitted March 18, 1912;

decided March 26, 1912.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 204 N. Y. 659.)
EXHIBIT
      23.1




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
        333-128607, 333-10993, 333-100186, 333-106054, 333-106080, and 333-121059
        on
        Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-129454, 333-03303, 333-03289,
        333-61598, 333-76316, 333-76288, 333-88372, 333-100184, 333-113684, 333-121371,
        333-125010 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 8, 2006 (which express
        an
        unqualified opinion and include explanatory paragraphs regarding the adoption
        of
        Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, *Accounting
        for Asset Retirement Obligations* ,
        effective January 1, 2003, and
        Financial Accounting Standards Board Financial Interpretation No. 47, *Accounting
        for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations* in
        2005, the
        change in actuarial valuation measurement date for the pension plan and other
        post-retirement benefits from September 30 to December 31 during 2003 and
        PNM
        Resources, Inc.’s acquisition of TNP Enterprises, Inc. in 2005), relating to the
        consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of PNM
        Resources, Inc. and management's report on the effectiveness of internal
        control
        over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
        PNM
        Resources, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005.


/s/
      DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP






Philadelphia,
      Pennsylvania


March
      10,
      2006
| EXHIBIT 99.2 |   |
|--------------|--------|

|   | CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

In connection with the Quarterly Report of USURF America, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the periodending June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,David M. Loflin, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and                               |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand result of operations of the Company. |

| Dated: August 19, 2002 | /S/ DAVID M. LOFLIN                           |   |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                   | David M. Loflin

Principal Accounting Officer |   |
|                   |                                          |   |