alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
rr.'RTMEMTO F .-.MSPOHlATiO M rKETOPERATiOi' S •E P " 1 A^1 : 2 0 SERVE D SEPTEMBE R 6 , 201 1 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C IN TH EMATTE RO F SKYWES T AIRLINE S FA A DOCKE T NO . [T O B EASSIGNED ]

(Civi l Penalty Action ) FDM S NO . FAA-2011-048 5 AMENDE D PROCEDURA LORDE R Paragrap h# 2 o f

th e Procedura l Orde r

i s amende da s follow s : WHEREFORE , th e partie s b e an dar e hereb y ORDERE D t o adher e t o th e followin g procedura l schedule :

.. . O n o r befor e Novembe r

4,2011 , th e partie s shal l conclud e al l discovery including , but

no t limite dto ^ depositions , documen t

production , response s t o productio n request s and/o r

interrogatories . I f

th e partie s canno t

resolv e adiscovery disput e the y shal l submi t

th e disput e t o th e undersigne dfor resolutio n i n atimel y manner.. .

U.S . Administrativ e La w Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tJ- ! *JWW! ' 

### W ^

::d i 

### -3 d

i5-i

### Is«>dtel|||^iatio n Administratio n . i, .

!^lci||pidenc e Avenue , S.W . ^t|l£i|^^^D C 2059 1 i^tteajiijl ^ Hearin g Docket Ct e Wilbur Wright Built I Tod dC . Enaerson , Re^wnd^'^ J I I]HffeQti»h6dventmen

t andI^ a I S]byl!<^i||rline s I 444 Se^iiitive r

Road I St . <3«^fe4J T 8479 0 I lEL : 43i5^4-353 0 ^ FAX : 435^34-350 5 •..•.v .


### Je l .%.. ; 

### N(M^PM|ip!oui ^ ^* ^ Fe(Ml^!^^|BtiohAdministration ' 160 1 I^#vemie , S.W . RentWQ^^ ^ 9805 7 Tm. : "42i-227-216 1 FAX : 425-227-100 7 ^•fv^; i ^ i -

• m

'€.' i 

### TheH«nGp|l)le Richar

dC . Goodv« m U.$li^||»Mnt.o|T:iaii§port|to i ^ ^ 1200lli^b-8e y Aveftue , S.E . ''' ^ . ^ Waslaiipf * D C 2059 0 r^'* ' TEL : 131^66-213 9 Attomey-AdMiCw J |ii366>512 1 Lega

l Assisyi^ ' FAX : i#366-753 6 i ^

wa s b y U.S . Mai l Fi x i

600 ] ;: Hearin g Oocket

4 

# v ^ y i
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1096 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1096

 To eliminate the requirement that certain covered beneficiaries under 
 chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, obtain a nonavailability-
 of-health-care statement with respect to obstetrics and gynecological 
                      care related to a pregnancy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 25, 2001

  Ms. Collins (for herself and Ms. Landrieu) introduced the following 
   bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To eliminate the requirement that certain covered beneficiaries under 
 chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, obtain a nonavailability-
 of-health-care statement with respect to obstetrics and gynecological 
                      care related to a pregnancy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Spouse Physician Choice 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF REQUIREMENT TO OBTAIN NONAVAILABILITY-OF-HEALTH-
              CARE STATEMENT IN CASES OF PREGNANCY.

    (a) Elimination of Requirement.--Section 1080(b) of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended by striking the second sentence.
    (b) Expansion of Nonavailability Statement Waiver Authority.--
Section 721 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted by Public Law 106-398; 114 Stat. 
1654A-446) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ``, or with respect to 
        obstetrics and gynecological care related to the pregnancy of 
        such a beneficiary who is enrolled in TRICARE Extra,'' after 
        ``TRICARE Standard''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (3) as 
                subparagraphs (A) through (C), respectively;
                    (B) by inserting ``(1)'' after ``(c) Exceptions.--
                ''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following new 
                paragraph:
    ``(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply in the case of obstetrics and 
gynecological care related to the pregnancy of a covered 
beneficiary.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0476

_________________

IN THE MATTER OF:

G.M.,

 Respondent and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Rienne H. McElyea, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 22 2023

02/22/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0476
§ 831.20 Authority of NTSB in aviation accident investigations. ( a ) *Scope.* The NTSB is authorized to investigate— ( 1 ) Each accident involving a civil aircraft in the United States, and any civil aircraft registered in the United States when an accident occurs in international waters;
( 2 ) Each accident involving a public aircraft as defined in 49 U.S.C. 40102(a)(41), except for aircraft operated by the U.S. Armed Forces or by an intelligence agency of the United States;
( 3 ) With the participation of appropriate military authorities, each accident involving a military aircraft and— ( i ) a civil aircraft; or
( ii ) certain public aircraft as described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
( b ) *Authority to examine or test.* Pursuant to § 831.9 of this part, a credentialed employee of the NTSB is authorized to examine or test any civil or certain public aircraft, aircraft engine, propeller, appliance, or property aboard such aircraft involved in an accident or incident subject to the NTSB's authority.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1092 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1092

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt feed truck chassis 
             from excise tax on heavy trucks and trailers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 22, 2001

   Mr. Gramm introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt feed truck chassis 
             from excise tax on heavy trucks and trailers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FOR FEED TRUCK CHASSIS FROM EXCISE TAX ON HEAVY 
              TRUCKS AND TRAILERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 4053(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to feed, seed, and fertilizer equipment) is amended by 
striking subparagraph (E) and inserting the following:
                    ``(E) for any combination of the foregoing, and
        any automobile truck chassis (so primarily designed) to which 
        such body is mounted or permanently affixed.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to sales occurring after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 28, 2020

NO. 03-20-00106-CV

S. W., Jr., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, KELLY, AND SMITH

MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on January 30, 2020. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment but that there was error requiring correction. Therefore, the Court 

modifies the trial court’s judgment to include the suffix “Jr.” when referring to S.W., Jr. The 

Court affirms the judgment as modified. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, 

no adjudication of costs is made.
IV 

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 591

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the National 

Park Service should form a committee for the purpose of establishing 

guidelines to launch a national design competition. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 16, 2002

Mr. BLUNT (for himself, Mr. CLAY, Mr. GRAVES, Mr. HULSHOF, and Mr. 

SKELTON) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the National Park Service should form a committee for 

the purpose of establishing guidelines to launch a national design competition.

Whereas President Thomas Jefferson received the approval of 

Congress on 6 February 28, 1803, to fund an expedition 

into the West with orders to explore the Missouri River 

and such tributaries as might lead to the Pacific Ocean 

on the most direct and practicable water route for purposes of commerce, in addition to which, the expedition 

was to gather scientific and geographical information, 

and to encourage peace among any Indian Nations encountered; 
2

•HRES 591 IH 

Whereas Meriwether Lewis, Captain of the First Regiment of 

Infantry, and former Secretary to President Jefferson, 

was appointed to lead the expedition, and he selected, 

with the approval of the President, William Clark to 

serve equally as a Captain in a leadership role; 

Whereas the Expedition returned to St. Louis, Missouri, on 

September 23, 1806, after a 28-month journey covering 

8,000 miles during which it traversed 11 future States: 

Illinois, Missouri, Kansas, Nebraska, Iowa, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Idaho, Washington, and 

Oregon; and 

Whereas the expedition was one of the most remarkable and 

productive scientific and military exploratory expeditions 

in all American history: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives directs 

2 the National Park Service to form a committee for the 

3 purpose of establishing guidelines to launch a national de4 sign competition for the following project: In as much as 

5 Congress desires to memorialize the Lewis and Clark Ex6 pedition and because the City of Louis was the departing 

7 and returning points of the Expedition as depicted by its 

8 Gateway to the West Arch, therefore the City of St. Louis 

9 should display a proper recognition of these great men in 

10 the form of a heroic sculpture portraying the Expedition 

11 to be built in the Luther Ely Smith Park in downtown 

12 St. Louis, which lies between the Arch and the Old Court13 house, all now governed by the National Park Service.

Æ
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0127

SAT Date: 12/4/2012

Print Date: 6/4/2013

Related cases:

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health:

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: 

IRR-S,E

LIVER

KIDNEY

SENS-S,L

DEVEL 

MUTA

ONCO

AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0127

FATE: 
Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

log Kow = 4.49 (E) 

S = 9.72 mg/L at 25 C (E)

VP = 1.0E-4 torr at 25 C (E)

BP = 354 C (E)

H = 3.15E-8 (E)

log Koc = 3.46 (E)

log Fish BCF = 2.63 (E)

log Fish BAF = 1.88 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 50-90 via sorption and possible partial biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = strong

PBT Potential: P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is poor all routes, based on physical/chemical 

properties. Expect poor Michael addition to the acrylate groups due to the low water solubility 

of the PMN compound. There are concerns for skin and eye irritation, developmental, liver, and 

kidney toxicities, respiratory and dermal sensitization, mutagenicity, and oncogenicity from the 

acrylate.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 0.84

daphnid 48-h LC50 0.78

green algal 96-h EC50 0.17

fish _ chronic value 0.001

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.023

algal _ chronic 

value

0.065

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for acrylates; SAR chemical class 

= acrylate; MW 254; liquid with mp < 20 C (P); log Kow = 4.49 (EPI); S = 3.4 to 9.7 mg/L at 

20 C (P); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured 

concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments
Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

1

SARs acrylates

SAR Class acrylate

Ecotox Category Acrylates

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: J. Kwiat
**From:** Frey, Nathan J. < Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov >

**Sent:** Friday, July 31, 2015 8:07 PM **To:** Culligan, Kevin; Szabo, Aaron **Subject:** Re: still to come tonight
This is consistent with my understanding but checking with others and will call if not.

**From** : Culligan, Kevin [ mailto:Culligan.Kevin@epa.gov ] **Sent** : Friday, July 31, 2015 08:03 PM Eastern Standard Time **To** : Szabo, Aaron; Frey, Nathan J. **Subject** : still t o come tonight
Hopefully within the hour:

1. 111(d) preamble 2. 111(d) reg text 3. FP RIA
You should already have

1. FP preamble 2. FP reg text 3. 111(b) preamble 4. 111(b) RIA 5. 111(b) reg text 6. 111(d) RIA
If you don’t have the last six items or I am missing something let me know. Nathan

– if you can call, that would be great.
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

UNITED STATES

v.

Senior Airman TIMOTHY P. WATSON

United States Air Force

ACM S32380

15 June 2016

Sentence adjudged 11 January 2016 by SP CM convened at Tinker Air Force

Base

, Oklahoma . Military Judge: Michael P. Dillinger (sitting alone).

Approved S entence: Bad

- conduct discharge, confinement for 3 month s
, and

reduction to E

- 1

.

Appellate Counsel for Appellant: Captain Annie W. Morgan

.

Appellate Counsel for the United States: Colonel Katherine E. Oler

Before

MITCHELL

, DUBRISKE , and BROWN Appellate Military Judges

This opinion is issued as an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent

under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4

.



### PER CURIAM :

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of Appellant occurred. Article 66(c), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c); United States v. R eed , 54 M.J. 37, 41 (C.A.A.F. 2000).

A lthough we find no prejudice to this particular Appellant, we are compelled to again address a number of discrepancies in the post

- trial processing of this case. First, the staff judge advocate’s recommendation (SJAR) incorrectly advised the convening authority the maximum punishment for this special court

- martial included forfeiture of allowances. Second, the addendum to the SJAR did not specifically advise the convening authority of h er mandatory requirement t o consider the SJAR and the report of result of trial before taking action. See Rule for Courts

- Martial 1107(b)(3)(A); Air Force Instruction (AFI) 51

- 201, Administration of Military Justice , ¶ 9.20.1.2 (6 June 2013). The consistentACM S32380 2 

### use of post

- trial proc essing templates found in AFI 51

- 201 will eliminate unnecessary errors as found here and better facilitate accurate post

- trial processing.

Finally, the addendum to the SJAR failed to address Appellant’s erroneous statement in his clemency submission that Article 60, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 860, prohibited the convening authority from disapproving the punitive discharge adjudged in this case. Appellant’s charged offense predated th e effective date for the new Article 60, UCMJ, provisions; thus, the convening authority retained her full clemency powers over Appellant’s sentence. We believe it is always prudent for a staff judge advocate, as the party solely responsible for accuratel y advising the convening authority, to identify and

correct erroneous statements of the law raised during post

- trial processing proceedings.

Nevertheless, no error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of Appellant

occurred

. Accordingly, the a pproved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE C OURT

LEAH M. CALAHAN

Clerk of the Court
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

BENJAMIN J. FREDERICK, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-2084

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed April 10, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; J. Kevin Abdoney, Judge. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, VILLANTI, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
# Az Európai Unió C 164/2004

| | ISSN 1725-518X |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | C 164 |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Tájékoztatások és közlemények | 47. évfolyam2004. június 23. |

ISSN 1725-518X

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

C 164

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Tájékoztatások és közlemények

47. évfolyam2004. június 23.

---

| Közleményszám | Tartalom | Oldal |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Információ |
| | Bizottság |
| 2004/C 164/1 | Euro átváltási árfolyamok | 1 |

Közleményszám

Tartalom

Oldal

I   Információ

Bizottság

2004/C 164/1

Euro átváltási árfolyamok

1

| HU | |
| --- | --- |

HU

---

I Információ

Bizottság

| 23.6.2004 | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | C 164/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2004

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

C 164/1

---

Euro átváltási árfolyamok (1)

2004. június 22.

(2004/C 164/01)

1 euro=

| | Pénznem | Átváltási árfolyam |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | USA dollár | 1,2091 |
| JPY | Japán yen | 131,17 |
| DKK | Dán korona | 7,4334 |
| GBP | Angol font | 0,664 |
| SEK | Svéd korona | 9,162 |
| CHF | Svájci frank | 1,5133 |
| ISK | Izlandi korona | 87,91 |
| NOK | Norvég korona | 8,324 |
| BGN | Bulgár leva | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Ciprusi font | 0,5817 |
| CZK | Cseh korona | 31,935 |
| EEK | Észt korona | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Magyar Forint | 255,35 |
| LTL | Litván litász/lita | 3,4527 |
| LVL | Lett lats | 0,6541 |
| MTL | Máltai líra | 0,4252 |
| PLN | Lengyel zloty | 4,5838 |
| ROL | Román lej | 40 614 |
| SIT | Szlovén tolar | 239,5 |
| SKK | Szlovák korona | 39,97 |
| TRL | Török líra | 1 796 300 |
| AUD | Ausztrál dollár | 1,7608 |
| CAD | Kanadai dollár | 1,6462 |
| HKD | Hong Kong-i dollár | 9,4305 |
| NZD | Új-zélandi dollár | 1,9314 |
| SGD | Szingapúri dollár | 2,0777 |
| KRW | Dél-Koreai won | 1 400,56 |
| ZAR | Dél-Afrikai rand | 7,6237 |

Pénznem

Átváltási árfolyam

USD

USA dollár

1,2091

JPY

Japán yen

131,17

DKK

Dán korona

7,4334

GBP

Angol font

0,664

SEK

Svéd korona

9,162

CHF

Svájci frank

1,5133

ISK

Izlandi korona

87,91

NOK

Norvég korona

8,324

BGN

Bulgár leva

1,9559

CYP

Ciprusi font

0,5817

CZK

Cseh korona

31,935

EEK

Észt korona

15,6466

HUF

Magyar Forint

255,35

LTL

Litván litász/lita

3,4527

LVL

Lett lats

0,6541

MTL

Máltai líra

0,4252

PLN

Lengyel zloty

4,5838

ROL

Román lej

40 614

SIT

Szlovén tolar

239,5

SKK

Szlovák korona

39,97

TRL

Török líra

1 796 300

AUD

Ausztrál dollár

1,7608

CAD

Kanadai dollár

1,6462

HKD

Hong Kong-i dollár

9,4305

NZD

Új-zélandi dollár

1,9314

SGD

Szingapúri dollár

2,0777

KRW

Dél-Koreai won

1 400,56

ZAR

Dél-Afrikai rand

7,6237

---

(1)

Forrás: Az Európai Központi Bank (ECB) átváltási árfolyama.

---
Page 1 of 1

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION RE ie AWHIQA 0 AUG 1 2 2010

PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS
B

RANCH

As of: August 12, 2010

PUBLIC Status: Posted,

Posted: August 12, 2010
SUBMISSION comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0054
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Felice Londa
Address: NJ

General Comment

See attached file(s)

Attachments

IRS-2010-0010-0054.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

https://fdms.erulemaking .net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/12/2010


August 9, 2010

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to
Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

Felice T, Londa
---

---

EXHIBIT 23.17



Date:  
  March 28, 2004 
  Our ref:  763781



**CONSENT
  OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

As independent public accountants of Trinet Investments in High-Tech Ltd., we
  hereby consent to the incorporation of our report dated March 13, 2003, included
  in Form 10-K of Ampal-American Israel Corporation for the year ended December
  31, 2002 (relating to the financial statements of Trinet Investments in High-Tech
  Ltd. not included herein), into Ampal-American Israel Corporations previously
  filed Registration Statements No. 333-61895 and No. 333-55970.



Brightman Almagor
  & Co
  Cretified Public Accountants
  A member of Deloitte Touche

---

---