ATTACHMENT 4 

STAFF REPORT 

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO RULE 74.2, ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS 

Ventura County Air Pollution Control District

669 County Square Drive 

Ventura, California 93003 

November 10, 2009 
 Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 2

CONTENTS

Section Page

Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 3 

Background ................................................................................................................... 4 

 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 4 

 Emission Inventory ................................................................................................................ 5 

Proposed Rule Requirements ................................................................................................................... 5 

Comparison of Proposed Rule Requirements with Other Air Pollution Control Requirements.............. 7 

 Comparison with National Rule............................................................................................. 8 

 Comparison with BACT (SCAQMD Rule 1113) .................................................................. 8 

 Comparison with Air Pollution Control Requirement Elements............................................ 9 

Impact of the Proposed Rule Revisions .......................................................................................................... 9 

 ROC Emission Impacts.......................................................................................................... 9 

 Socioeconomic Impacts Analysis .......................................................................................... 9 

 Types of Affected Business and Industry Including Small Business................................... 10 

 Economic Impacts................................................................................................................ 10 

 Range of Probable Costs...................................................................................................... 11 

 Costs to Consumers.............................................................................................................. 12 

 Costs to Small Business ....................................................................................................... 14 

 Emission Reduction Potential of the Rule............................................................................ 14 

 Cost-Effectiveness ............................................................................................................... 14 

 Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Analysis............................................................................. 15 

Environmental Impacts of Methods of Compliance/CEQA........................................................................ 15 

Other Factors ................................................................................................................. 16 

 Technological Feasibility..................................................................................................... 16 

 Enforceability ................................................................................................................. 16 

 Public Acceptability............................................................................................................. 16 

 Environmental Compliance and Review.............................................................................. 17 

 Future Technology Assessments.......................................................................................... 17 

References ................................................................................................................. 17 

Compliant Products List .................................................................................................. Appendix I 

LIST OF TABLES 

Table 1 Proposed ROC Limits ........................................................................................................... 6 

Table 2 Comparison of Proposal with South AQMD Rule 1113 ROC Limits .................................. 8 

Table 3 Manufacturers Responding to Economic Impact Survey.................................................... 11 

Table 4 Estimates of Projected Maximum Coating Prices Increases ............................................... 13 

Table 5 Cost-Effectiveness .............................................................................................................. 15 

Table 6 Calculation of Incremental Cost-Effectiveness for SCAQMD ROC Limits Option........... 15 

Table 7 Environmental Impacts and Mitigations of Methods of Compliance.................................. 16 

DISCLAIMER

This report contains references to company and product names to illustrate product availability. Mention of these 

names is not to be considered an endorsement by the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District. 
 Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

Staff is proposing to adopt amendments to Rule 74.2, 

Architectural Coatings, to reduce the reactive organic 

compound (ROC) emissions from the coating of 

structures and their appurtenances. This rule 

development is based on the Suggested Control 

Measure (SCM) adopted by the California Air 

Resources Board (ARB) on October 26, 2007. The 

SCM was based on ARB’s evaluation of the 

feasibility of South Coast AQMD Rule 1113 ROC 

limits for other air districts without having to rely on 

SCAQMD’s coating emissions averaging provisions. 

Ventura County is designated as a serious 

nonattainment area for the federal ozone standard and 

as a severe nonattainment area for the state ozone 

standard. The California Clean Air Act requires 

areas designated as severe nonattainment for ozone to 

adopt control measures required in Sections 40913, 

40914, and 40919 of the California Health and Safety 

Code (H & SC): 

3⁄4 Section 40913 requires districts to develop a plan 

to achieve California’s ambient air quality 

standard by the earliest practicable date. Control 

Measure R-329 in the District’s 2007 Air Quality 

Management Plan references the architectural 

coatings rule. Rule 74.2 is being amended to 

implement this measure. 

3⁄4 Section 40914 requires each district plan to 

demonstrate that the plan includes “every 

feasible measure.” Districts must adopt the most 

effective and feasible control measures to reduce 

ROC emissions from architectural coatings. The 

October 26, 2007, adoption of the 2007 SCM 

included Resolution 07-46, which contained a 

Finding of the proposed SCM as “feasible,” and 

that it should be adopted by districts that need 

additional emission reductions for the attainment 

of state or federal ambient air quality standards. 

Amendments to Rule 74.2 are being proposed to 

meet this requirement. 

3⁄4 Section 40919 requires districts classified as 

serious or severe nonattainment for ozone to 

adopt Best Available Retrofit Control 

Technology (BARCT) for all existing sources. 

BARCT means an emission limitation that is 

based on the maximum degree of reduction 

achievable, taking into account environmental, 

energy, and economic impacts by each class or 

category of sources (H & SC Section 40406). 

Staff has found that the SCM requirements meet 

the BARCT requirement based on the CARB 

staff report that contains analyses of emission 

control, environmental impacts, energy impacts, 

and economic impacts. Therefore the proposed 

rule meets the requirements of H & SC Section 

40919. 

Staff is proposing to reduce ROC emissions from 

architectural coating operations in Ventura County by 

reducing the ROC content of the following coating 

categories: Flat Coatings; Nonflat Coatings; 

Aluminum Roof Coatings; Bituminous Roof 

Coatings, Concrete/Masonry Sealers, Dry Fog 

Coatings, Floor Coatings; Mastic Texture Coatings, 

Primers, Sealers and Undercoaters; Reactive 

Penetrating Sealers; Roof Coatings; Rust 

Preventative Coatings; Traffic Marking Coatings; 

Wood Coatings; and Zinc-Rich Primers. 

Proposed amendments to Rule 74.2 will affect many 

architectural coatings used on new structures and 

their appurtenances and used to maintain existing 

structures and appurtenances. This rule impacts 

field-applied architectural coatings rather than those 

applied in a spray booth. 

According to the ARB architectural coating survey of 

2004, the California inventory of ROC emissions 

from architectural coatings (excluding cleanup 

solvents) is approximately 95 tons per day. This 

translates to about 2.1 tons of ROC per day emissions 

in Ventura County based on a population factor. The 

estimated emission reduction from this proposed 

revision is about 24 percent or 0.5 tons of ROC per 

day. Although ARB staff estimated a 28 percent 

emission reduction in the 2007 SCM Staff Report, a 

more conservative estimate has been made to 

compensate for lost emission reductions if the rule is 

not 100 percent effective. 

ARB staff estimated the cost-effectiveness of the 

SCM by dividing the total annual cost to reformulate 

all noncomplying products in a given coating 

category by the total annual emissions for that 

category. Based on their analyses, the costeffectiveness for the individual ROC categories 

ranges from essentially no cost to $13.90 per pound 

of ROC reduced. The average cost-effectiveness was 

weighted by emission reductions across all the 

categories ROC limits proposed for change and was 

approximately $1.12 per pound of ROC reduced. 

This cost-effectiveness value assumes that average 

resin costs for reformulation will increase by 20 

percent. 
 Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 4

Ventura County APCD staff also estimated the costeffectiveness of proposed amendments to Rule 74.2. 

The estimate of $1.38 per pound of ROC reduced is 

based on the cost to coating manufacturers for 

reformulating coatings apportioned by the population 

of the county. There are currently no architectural 

coating manufacturers in the county. 

ARB staff also performed a cost analysis to 

determine the potential price increases of 

reformulated coatings for consumers. A worst-case 

analysis assumes that all the costs of the SCM are 

passed along to the consumers, which is highly 

unlikely because compliant competitive coatings are 

already available. This analysis showed a range of 

no price increase for the flat coatings to a cost 

increase of $27.30 per gallon for floor coatings. 

Because the complying share of floor coatings is 85 

percent, many manufacturers have already 

reformulated their coatings to meet the proposed 

ROC limit. Therefore, ARB staff determined that it 

was appropriate for the remaining manufacturers to 

meet the proposed limit. Overall, ARB staff 

estimated the average cost increase per unit at about 

$1.21 per gallon if all costs were passed on to the 

consumer. Currently, the average cost per gallon for 

consumers is about $19.20. Thus the maximum 

increase is approximately six percent. 

This report contains five additional sections: (1) 

Background, (2) Proposed Rule Requirements, (3) 

Comparison of Proposed Rule Requirements with 

Other Air Pollution Control Requirements, (4) Impact 

of the Proposed Rule, and (5) Environmental Impacts 

and Methods of Compliance. The first section 

provides background information including 

regulatory history, latest air pollution control 

technology and source description. The second 

section explains the key features of proposed 

amendments to Rule 74.2. The third section 

compares the proposed requirements with existing 

federal requirements and Best Available Control 

Technology (BACT). The fourth section is an 

analysis of the effect of the proposed rule on ROC 

emissions and socioeconomic impacts. The last 

section examines the environmental impacts of 

compliance methods and the mitigation of those 

impacts. 

BACKGROUND 

Introduction 

Architectural Coatings are defined as any coating 

applied to a stationary structure and their 

appurtenances, to mobile homes, to portable 

buildings, to pavements, or to curbs. Architectural 

coatings are formulated with a variety of components 

including pigments, resins, solvents, and different 

additives such as driers, anti-skinning agents, anti-sag 

agents, dispersing agents, defoaming agents, 

preservatives and fungicides. The primary source of 

air emissions from architectural coatings is the 

solvent component in solvent-based coatings and the 

co-solvents from waterborne coatings. 

Currently, architectural coatings in Ventura County 

are regulated by Rule 74.2, which was first adopted 

on June 19, 1979, and was based on the ARB’s 1977 

Model Rule. ARB and the air districts subsequently 

revised this model rule in 1985, 1989, and 2000. The 

2000 SCM was the basis for the last major revisions 

to this rule. 

CARB, in cooperation with the local air pollution 

control agencies and the architectural coatings 

industry, revised the Suggested Control Measure 

(SCM) for architectural coatings in 2007. The need 

to revisit the SCM has arisen because of: (i) advances 

in coatings technology over the past seven years, and 

(ii) the need for emission reductions to attain healthbased air quality standards in many districts. CARB, 

in cooperation with the local air districts, has 

developed a new SCM that acts as a model rule for 

districts when adopting and amending their local 

architectural coating rules. 

Staff has reviewed CARB’s work and participated on 

the California Air Resources Board’s Architectural 

Coatings Working Group during the development of 

the SCM. As part of the SCM development process, 

CARB prepared a Staff Report including an 

economic analysis and analyzing the SCM for 

environmental impacts. For the sake of statewide 

uniformity and the need for additional emission 

reductions, the District is proposing to adopt the 

SCM adopted by ARB on October 26, 2007. 

EPA promulgated the National Volatile Organic 

Compound Emission Standards for Architectural 

Coatings (National Architectural Coatings Rule) in 

1998. The 2007 SCM is more stringent than the 

national rule for all coating categories. 
 Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 5

Emission Inventory 

The quantity of ROC emissions from the use of 

architectural coatings is best determined using the 

ARB’s survey of coatings sold in the state. 

According to their most recent survey in 2005 

(architectural coatings sold in 2004), approximately 

95 tons of ROC per day were emitted from the use of 

architectural coatings in California. Using a 

population factor of about 2.2% for a Ventura County 

relative to the population of California, the estimated 

emission inventory for this source category is about 

2.1 tons of ROC per day. 

PROPOSED RULE REQUIREMENTS 

This section summarizes the major proposed 

requirements of proposed amendments to Rule 74.2. 

The proposed new ROC limits are listed in Table 1. 

All of the proposed coating categories were 

thoroughly researched by ARB staff in the SCM staff 

report to determine the technical feasibility of the 

proposed limits. One measure was the percentage of 

coatings that are available today that comply with the 

proposed future limits. The complying market share 

for each new coating ROC limit ranged from 3 

percent for Rust Preventative coatings to 100 percent 

for Driveway Sealers. In all cases, products are 

available today that comply with proposed new 

limits. The major changes are listed below: 

1. Lowered the ROC limit for nineteen coating 

categories including: Nonflats; NonflatsHigh Gloss; Aluminum Roof; Bituminous 

Roof; Concrete Sealers; Driveway Sealers; 

Dry Fog; Floor; Mastic Texture; Roof, Rust 

Preventative, Specialty Primers, Sealers and 

Undercoaters; Traffic Marking; 

Waterproofing Membranes; Wood; and 

Zinc-Rich Primers. The limits will go into 

effect January 1, 2011 except for Flats, Rust 

Preventative, Primer, Sealers and 

Undercoaters, and Specialty Primers, Sealers 

and Undercoaters which will go into effect 

on January 1, 2012. 

2. Deleted fifteen coating categories including: 

Antenna; Anti-fouling; Clear Brushing 

Lacquer; Lacquers; Sanding Sealers; 

Varnishes; Clear Fire Retardant; Opaque 

Fire Retardant; Flow; Quick-Dry Enamel; 

Quick-Dry Primer Sealer Undercoater; 

Swimming Pool Repair; Temperature 

Indicator; Waterproofing Sealers; and Water 

Proofing Concrete/Masonry Sealers. 

3. Added ten new coating categories including: 

Aluminum Roof, Basement Specialty; 

Concrete/Masonry Sealer; Driveway Sealer; 

Reactive Penetrating Sealer; Stone 

Consolidants; Tub & Tile Refinish; 

Waterproofing Membrane; Wood Coatings; 

and Zinc-Rich Primers. 

4. Averaging Provision did sunset in 2005 and 

was not included in 2007 SCM. 

In order to more easily understand the applicability of 

these new coating categories, ARB staff has 

summarized the transitions as follows: 

Aluminum Roof Coating: This is a new category 

that was formerly covered by Metallic Pigmented. 

Basement Specialty Coating: This new category 

was formerly covered by Waterproofing Sealer and 

Waterproofing Concrete/Masonry Sealer. 

Concrete/Masonry Sealer: This new category was 

formerly covered by Waterproofing Sealer, 

Waterproofing Concrete/Masonry Sealer, and other 

categories. 

Driveway Sealer: This proposed new category was 

formerly covered by the default ROC limits (Flat, 

Nonflat, or Nonflat- high gloss). 

Fire Retardant Coatings: This coating category 

will be eliminated and these coatings will be subject 

to the default ROC limits. 
 Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 6

Table 1. Proposed ROC Limits 

COATING CATEGORY CURRENT 

LIMIT1,2

EFFECTIVE 

1/1/2011 

EFFECTIVE 

1/1/2012 

Flat Coatings 100 50 

Nonflat Coatings 150 100 

Nonflat–High Gloss 250 150 

SPECIALTY COATINGS 

Aluminum Roof Coatings 400 

Basement Specialty 

Coatings 

 400 

Bituminous Roof 300 50 

Bituminous Roof Primer 350 

Bond Breaker 350 

Concrete Curing 

Compounds 

350 

Concrete/Masonry 

Sealers 

350 100 

Driveway Sealers 100 50 

Dry Fog Coatings 400 150 

Faux Finishing Coatings 350 

Fire Resistive Coatings 350 

Floor Coatings 250 100 

Form-Release Compounds 250 

Graphic Arts-Sign 

Paints 

500 

High Temperature 

Coatings 

420 

Industrial Maintenance 250 

Low Solids Coatings3 120 

Magnesite Cement 

Coatings 

450 

Mastic Texture Coatings 300 100 

Metallic Pigmented 

Coatings 

500 

Multi-Color Coatings 250 

Pretreatment Wash 

Primers 

420 

Primers, Sealer & 

Undercoaters 

200 100 

Reactive Penetrating 

Sealers 

 3504 

 

1 The specified limits remain in effect unless revised limits are listed 

in subsequent columns in the table. 2

 Conversion factor: one pound ROC per gallon (U.S.) = 119.95 grams ROC 

per liter. 3

 Units for low-solid coatings are grams of ROC per liter (pounds of ROC 

per gallon) of coating, including water and exempt compounds. 4

 The ROC limits for Tub & Tile Refinish, Stone Consolidants, and Reactive Penetrating Sealers will 

become effective on date of rule adoption. 
 Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 7

Table 1 (continued) Proposed ROC Limits 

COATING CATEGORY CURRENT 

LIMIT 

LIMIT 

EFFECTIVE 

1/1/2011 

LIMIT 

EFFECTIVE 

1/1/2012 

Recycled Coatings 250 

Roof Coatings 250 50 

Rust Preventative 400 250 

Shellacs – Clear 730 

Shellacs – Opaque 550 

Specialty Primers, 

Sealers, & Undercoaters 

350 100 

Stains 350 250 

Stone Consolidants 4504 

Swimming Pool Coatings 340 

Traffic Marking 

Coatings 

150 100 

Tub & Tile Refinish 4204 

Waterproofing Membranes 250 

Wood Coatings 275 

Wood Preservatives 350 

Zinc-Rich Primers 500 340 

Reactive Penetrating Sealer: This new category 

was formerly covered by Waterproofing Sealer and 

Waterproofing Concrete/Masonry Sealer, and the 

new ROC limit will become effective on date of rule 

adoption. 

Stone Consolidant: This new category was formerly 

covered by Waterproofing Concrete/Masonry Sealer, 

and the new ROC limit will become effective on date 

of rule adoption. 

Tub and Tile Refinish: This new category was 

formerly covered by the default ROC limits (NonflatHigh Gloss) and the new ROC limit will become 

effective on date of rule adoption. 

Waterproofing Membrane: This new category was 

formerly covered by Waterproofing Sealer and 

Waterproofing Concrete/Masonry Sealer. 

Wood Coatings: This new category contains all the 

former categories listed under Clear Wood including 

Clear Brushing Lacquer, Lacquer, Sanding Sealer, 

and Varnishes. It also contains those Waterproofing 

Sealers applied to wood substrates. 

Zinc-Rich Primers: This new category was 

formerly covered by Metallic Pigmented coatings. 

It is useful to know that the one-liter (1.057 quart) or 

smaller containers are still exempt from rule 

requirements. Also, another three-year sell through 

provision is allowed for all noncomplying coatings 

for proposed new ROC limits. This sell-through 

provision is designed to allow the coatings to be sold 

up to 3 years after the effective date if it was in 

compliance at the time of manufacture. This should 

minimize the need to ship these coatings back to the 

manufacturer or create additional hazardous waste. 

COMPARISON OF PROPOSED RULE REQUIREMENTS 

 WITH OTHER AIR POLLUTION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS 

H & SC Section 40727.2 requires districts to compare 

the requirements of a proposed revised rule with 

other air pollution control requirements. These other 

air pollution control requirements include federal 

regulations, Best Available Control Technology 

(BACT), and any other District rule applying to the 

same equipment or process. Proposed amendments 

to Rule 74.2 is more stringent than those in the 

United States Environmental Protection Agency’s 

national rule and are based on the ARB’s 2007 SCM. 
 Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 8

Even considering the averaging provision, SCAQMD 

Rule 1113 may be considered to be BACT and is 

more stringent than proposed amendments to Rule 

74.2. No other District rules have air pollution 

control requirements that would conflict with Rule 

74.2 requirements. 

Comparison with National Rule 

There are many differences between proposed 

amendments to Rule 74.2 and the national 

architectural coatings rule, which became effective 

on September 13, 1999. The national rule only 

applies to manufacturers and importers of 

architectural coatings while Rule 74.2 applies to 

manufacturers, distributors, retailers, and users of 

architectural coatings. The national rule also has 

generally higher (less restrictive) ROC limits than 

Rule 74.2. For example, the proposed ROC limits in 

the national rule for the three largest categories (flats, 

non-flats, and industrial maintenance coatings) are 

250, 380, and 450 grams per liter, respectively. This 

compares with the ROC limits of 50, 100 (excluding 

high-gloss non-flats), and 250 grams per liter, 

respectively, for the same categories in proposed 

amendments to Rule 74.2. The national rule also 

includes 30 additional specialty categories not 

included in proposed amendments to Rule 74.2. The 

“national” categories are covered under one of the 

existing coating categories in Rule 74.2. ARB staff 

analyzed these additional national categories and 

found it was not necessary to add most of them to the 

SCM because: there are complying products that may 

be regulated under other coating categories in 

existing district rules; they are not architectural 

coatings; or they are not sold in California. Staff has 

also analyzed the additional coating categories in the 

national rule and concluded that for all but two of the 

categories (Calcime Recoater Coating and Concrete 

Surface Retarder), they are not needed because they 

would be subject to another coating category in the 

proposed rule or to another district coating rule. Staff 

has also determined that the Calcimine Recoater 

Coating is unique to the New England area and the 

Concrete Surface Retarder is not a coating and, 

therefore, these categories are not necessary for the 

proposed rule. 

Comparison with BACT (SCAQMD Rule 1113) 

SCAQMD Rule 1113 ROC Limits would be Best 

Available Control Technology (BACT) because it 

would be the most effective emission control device, 

emission limit, or technique that has been required or 

used for this type of equipment. These limits would 

not be BACT if such limitations have not been 

demonstrated to be achievable in practice. 

Table 2. Comparison of Proposal with 

SCAQMD Rule 1113 ROC Limits 

Coating Category ROC Limit – 

Rule 74.2 

(proposed) 

ROC Limit –

SCAQMD 

(Adopted) 

Al Roof Coating 400 100 

Concrete Curing5 350 100 

Floor Coating 100 50 

Indus. Maintenance 250 100 

Nonflats 100 50 

Nonflat –Hi Gloss 150 50 

Rust Preventative 250 100 

Stains 250 100 

Waterproof Sealers 275 (wood) 100 

Zinc-Rich Primers 340 100 

For the 10 coating categories listed in Table 2, the 

proposed ROC limits for Rule 74.2 are less stringent 

than the adopted limits in South Coast AQMD’s Rule 

1113. An important caveat is that the South Coast 

rule contains an averaging provision that allows 

industry to more easily comply with the more 

stringent limits in Table 2 . The SCAQMD’s 

averaging provisions allow manufacturers to average 

the ROC content of their coatings that over-comply 

with the proposed limits with other coatings that do 

not comply as long as the overall emission reductions 

are equivalent or lower. Ventura County is not 

proposing to renew an existing averaging provision 

because the Environmental Protection Agency has 

identified an this provision as a deficiency in the 

State Implementation Plan because of enforceability 

issues (FR Sept 20, 2002, Vol. 67, Number 183). 

Moreover, ARB staff established limits in the 2007 

SCM that could be met without the need for industry 

to develop averaging programs. Another drawback 

of the averaging provision is that this regulatory 

scenario may tend to favor larger paint manufacturers 

with large product portfolios that can facilitate 

averaging schemes. 

Another important difference between proposed 

amendments to Rule 74.2 and SCAQMD Rule 1113 

is that wood coatings in Rule 1113 are not eligible for 

the one quart small container exemption. Proposed 

Rule 74.2 retains the one quart small container 

exemption for all coating categories. The most recent 

 

5

 The 100 grams per liter ROC limit does not 

apply to roadways or bridges. 
 Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 9

ARB survey reported that only three percent of the 

sales volume was derived from small containers 

(quarts or less). 

Comparison of Air Pollution Control 

Requirement Elements 

Health and Safety Code Section 40727.2.(c) requires 

the district review the following elements in the 

comparative analysis between proposed amendments 

to Rule 74.2 and federal and BACT rules: 

• Averaging provisions, units and any other 

pertinent provisions associated with 

emission limits. 

• Operating parameters and work practice 

requirements. 

• Monitoring, reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, including test methods, 

format, content and frequency. 

• Any other element the district determines 

warrants review. 

The averaging provisions in Rule 74.2 sunset in 

2005, and no new averaging provisions are being 

proposed. The coating (emission) limits in proposed 

amendments to Rule 74.2 are stated as grams of ROC 

per liter of coating less water and less exempt organic 

compounds. These units are identical to the units in 

both the national rule and SCAQMD Rule 1113. 

There are no air pollution control requirements 

involving operating parameters in any of the rules 

subject to this analysis. Proposed amendments to 

Rule 74.2 include a work practice requirement that 

calls for closing coating and solvent containers when 

not in use. Similar requirements are found in the 

national rule and SCAQMD Rule 1113. 

There are no monitoring or recordkeeping 

requirements in proposed amendments to Rule 74.2. 

Test Methods have been included in proposed Rule 

74.2 are needed to determine ROC content and other 

coating characteristics. These test methods do not 

conflict with test methods cited in the national rule or 

SCAQMD Rule 1113. District staff has determined 

there are no other air pollution control requirement 

elements that warrant review in this comparative 

analysis.

IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED RULE REVISIONS 

ROC Emissions Impacts 

The emission reduction potential of proposed 

amendments to Rule 74.2 is estimated at 0.5 tons of 

ROC per day. This estimate is based on the SCM 

reductions estimated by CARB staff adjusted for the 

population of Ventura County, which is 2.2 percent 

of the state population, and adjusted for 80 percent 

rule effectiveness. The estimated rule effectiveness 

is based on the potential for abuse of the quart 

exemption and possible misuse of coatings by 

ignoring label recommendations. Without the 

correction for rule effectiveness, the estimated 

emission reductions based on the SCM analysis 

would have been 0.62 tons of ROC per day. 

Socioeconomic Impacts Analysis 

H & SC Section 40728.5 requires a district to 

perform an assessment of the socioeconomic impacts 

before adopting, amending, or repealing a rule that 

will significantly affect air quality or emission 

limitations. The district board is required to actively 

consider the socioeconomic impact of the proposal 

and make a good faith effort to minimize adverse 

socioeconomic impacts. 

H & SC Section 40728.5 defines “socioeconomic 

impact” as the following: 

1. The type of industry or business, including 

small business, affected by the rule. 

2. The impact of the rule on employment and 

the economy of the region. 

3. The range of probable costs, including costs 

to industry or business, including small 

business. 

4. The availability and cost-effectiveness of 

alternatives to the proposed rule. 

5. The emission reduction potential of the rule. 

6. The necessity of adopting the rule to attain 

state and federal ambient air standards. 

The South Coast Air Quality Management District 

(SCAQMD) amended their architectural coating Rule 

1113 in 1996, 1999, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2006 

and 2007. The final ROC limits from the latest 

adoption are more stringent than the 2007 SCM 

limits adopted by CARB, as shown in Table 2. 

SCAQMD routinely runs regional economic models 

to determine socioeconomic impacts of their rule 

adoptions and did so for their Rule 1113 adoptions. 

Although the SCM is not a state regulation, CARB 

nevertheless analyzed the economic impacts that 
 Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 10

would result from implementation of the SCM ROC 

limits. Traditionally, Ventura County APCD has not 

used regional economic models in their 

socioeconomic analyses and is not proposing to do so 

in this rule development. Correspondence from 

CARB staff to the Districts states that the analysis 

(Chapter 7, Economic Impacts, from the SCM staff 

report) is appropriate for use by local air districts for 

determining costs and economic impacts from the 

proposed architectural coating rules. In addition, 

CARB emphasizes that it is not necessary for the 

districts to use a regional economic model to perform 

the economic analysis for the purpose of adopting 

amendments to Rule 74.2 “because the cost increase 

associated with the SCM is small (in comparison 

with the regional economy).” 

Thus, for the purpose of this socioeconomic analysis, 

staff has summarized the relevant published cost and 

economic impacts from CARB and SCAQMD 

reports without doing additional economic surveys or 

running economic computer models. 

Types of Affected Business and Industry 

Including Small Business 

Proposed amendments to Rule 74.2 would potentially 

impact: (i) industries engaged in manufacturing paint, 

varnishes, enamels and allied products (SIC 2851); 

(ii) end users of architectural coatings, including doit-yourself consumers, painting contractors (SIC 

1721) that may be small businesses, and maintenance 

personnel; and (iii) suppliers, sellers, and solicitors of 

architectural coatings (SIC 5198, 5231). New 

construction and maintenance of the following may 

be impacted by this proposal: buildings; 

transportation infrastructure; industrial structures 

such as aboveground tanks; and any stationary 

structure or appurtenance. 

Economic Impacts 

Introduction: The CARB analysis focused on the 

impact of the SCM on the profitability of coating 

manufacturers to determine employment impacts for 

their industry only. CARB relied heavily on survey 

responses from coating manufacturers. CARB staff 

evaluated employment, business creation, and 

business competitiveness for the coating 

manufacturers in California. 

CARB determined there would be little impact on 

coating manufacturers using their assessment 

techniques. Their analyses support a determination 

that proposed amendments to Rule 74.2 will not have 

an unacceptable adverse impact on employment and 

the economy in Ventura County. 

CARB Analysis: According to CARB staff, the SCM 

is not expected to cause a noticeable change in 

California employment and payroll of the coating 

manufacturers because the analysis shows that the 

proposal will not significantly alter their profitability. 

CARB staff estimated profitability impacts by 

analyzing the impact of these costs on return on 

equity (ROE) for selected sample coating 

manufacturers. The approach used to determine these 

economic impacts was as follows: 

1. A sample of three representative businesses 

of different sizes was selected from a list of 

164 affected businesses based on the sales 

revenues and the quantity of noncompliant 

coatings they manufactured. 

2. Compliance with the proposal was estimated 

for each of these businesses. 

3. Estimated cost was adjusted for federal and 

state taxes. 

4. The three-year average ROE was calculated 

where data were available for each of these 

businesses by averaging their ROEs for 

2004 through 2006. ROE is calculated by 

dividing the net profit by shareholders’ 

equity (net worth for privately held 

companies). 

5. The adjusted cost was then subtracted from 

the net profit data. The results were used to 

calculate an adjusted three-year average 

ROE. 

6. The adjusted ROE was then compared with 

the ROE before the subtraction of the 

adjusted cost to determine the potential 

impact on the profitability of the businesses. 

ROE reductions ranged from a decline of 1.1 percent 

for large businesses to a decline of 4.7 percent for 

small businesses. A decrease of 10 percent in ROE 

or more was considered to be a significant adverse 

impact. The threshold value of 10 percent has been 

used consistently since 1990 by CARB staff to 

determine impact severity of proposed regulations. 

This threshold is consistent with the thresholds used 

by EPA and others. 

In reaching this conclusion, CARB assumed that 

coating manufacturers, both within and outside of 

California, would absorb all the costs from the 

adoption of this proposal. This represents the 

maximum impact on the manufacturers. This 

assumption of absorption of all costs would mean 

decreased profits for the coating manufacturers. 
 Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 11

However, since coating manufacturing profitability is 

unlikely to be significantly reduced, employment, 

business creation and expansion, and business 

competitiveness should not be significantly affected 

for that industry, according to CARB staff. CARB 

noted that its estimates of the reductions in ROE 

might be high. It also noted, however, that since its 

analysis was based on assumptions that may not be 

true for all businesses, it was possible that some 

businesses might be adversely affected. 

Conclusion: Because there are no architectural 

coating manufacturers in the county, there should be 

no local impact on ROE and very little impacts on 

employment, business creation and expansion, and 

business competitiveness for these companies. 

Range of Probable Costs 

The economic impacts discussed above are the result 

of cost increases, if any, caused by adoption of the 

proposed rule. In this section, we discuss the likely 

cost impacts. We have examined these cost impacts 

on manufacturers and consumers by looking at both 

the CARB and SCAQMD analyses. CARB staff 

prepared a detailed assessment of the expected costs 

in the SCM staff report. They examined both the 

economic impacts on the coating manufacturers and 

the consumers of coatings. 

Proposed amendments to Rule 74.2 may impact 

consumers and other users of architectural coatings 

by increasing coating costs. CARB staff determined 

the maximum potential cost to consumers by 

assuming that manufacturers will pass on all 

increases in reformulation costs. An evaluation of 

cost impacts to manufacturers is needed to perform 

this worst-case cost analysis for consumer impacts. 

Cost Data Sources: CARB staff relied on industry 

responses to the 2007 ARB Economic Impacts 

Survey for coating costs specific to manufacturers. 

ARB received 36 responses from a group of 147 

manufacturers impacted by the proposed ROC limits. 

These responses were manufacturers’ best estimate of 

the costs of meeting the proposal including 

evaluation of nonrecurring and recurring costs. 

Nonrecurring costs include research and development 

costs, product and consumer testing costs, new or 

modified capital equipment costs, and one-time 

marketing/label changes. Recurring costs include 

costs for raw materials, recordkeeping, and reporting. 

The 2007 ARB Economic Survey responses 

represented a wide range of manufacturer sizes 

including a variety of large, medium, and small 

companies, representing about 39 percent of the 

architectural coatings market in California. Table 3 

lists these respondents. Many companies will not be 

impacted by the proposal including those companies 

whose products already comply with the proposed 

limits and those companies that do not market 

products in those categories affected by the proposal. 

Twelve out of the 36 respondents indicated that they 

would not incur any costs to meet the SCM proposed 

limits. 

TABLE 3 - Manufacturers Responding to Economic Impact Survey 

1 3M Company 19 Jones Blair 

2 Ace Hardware Paint Division 20 Kelly Moore Paint Company 

3 Bay Systems North America LLC 21 Life Paint Company 

4 Bonakemi 22 Minuteman Int. – Multi Clean Division 

5 Carlise Coating & Waterproofing Inc. 23 Mortex Manufacturing Co. Inc. 

6 Connlin Company Inc. 24 Pacific Polymers International Inc. 

7 Ellis Paint Company 25 Ponderosa Paint Company 

8 Epmar Corporation 26 RJ McGlennon Inc. 

9 ER Systems Inc. 27 Sherwin Williams 

10 Frazee 28 Specialty Coat and Chemical 

11 Gemini Industries 29 Technical Roofing and Solutions Inc. 

12 Griggs Paint of Domcom Enterprises Inc. 30 The Garland Company 

13 Henry Company 31 United Gilsonite Laboratories 

14 Hillyard 32 United States Gypsum 

15 Ingels Inc. 33 Valspar Architectural Coatings 

16 Insi-X Products Corporation 34 Waterlox Coatings Corporation 

17 Jasco Chemical Corporation 35 XIM Products Inc. 

18 JFB Hart Coatings Inc. 36 ZRC Worldwide 
 Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 12

In addition to the cost data supplied by 

manufacturers, CARB staff researched the raw 

material costs needed for coating reformulation. 

Sample complying and noncomplying product 

formulations were developed based on responses to 

ARB’s 2005 Survey, product data sheets, and input 

from manufacturers. ARB determined the costs from 

changing raw materials needed for reformulation by 

obtaining information from the Chemical Market 

Reporter Magazine, chemical manufacturers, and 

distributors of raw materials. In cases where a price 

range or multiple prices were found for a particular 

ingredient, ARB used the highest price found in the 

analysis. For ingredients where no price information 

was available, a default value of $1.50 per pound was 

assigned to those ingredients. This value is higher 

than most of the ingredient prices used in the raw 

material cost analysis including resins, which are the 

most expensive main ingredients. 

In amending SCAQMD Rule 1113, cost estimates 

were based on cost information supplied by resin 

suppliers and some coating manufacturers. For the 

most part, resin suppliers were the most cooperative 

in providing price information. 

Costs to Manufacturers: CARB staff determined 

costs to manufacturers in California outside of the 

SCAQMD to reformulate noncompliant coatings to 

comply with the proposed ROC limits for each of the 

affected coating categories. The detailed calculations 

and assumptions may be found in the SCM staff 

report. The total annualized cost of the proposed 

SCM was $12.3 million, which consists of $4 million 

per year in nonrecurring costs and $8.3 million in 

annual recurring costs. For comparison, the total 

annualized cost to manufacturers estimated by 

SCAQMD to meet the more stringent ROC limits 

was $73.6 million in 2006. The average annual cost 

of compliance in the South Coast district was 

estimated by AQMD staff at $58.3 million from 2002 

to 2015. These numbers were as reported in their 

respective economic analyses. A comparison of the 

total annual costs reported by CARB and SCAQMD 

analyses show much higher costs of compliance in 

the South Coast AQMD, most likely a result of their 

more stringent ROC limits and/or additional 

administrative requirements. 

Conclusion: Since Ventura County is proposing to 

adopt the SCM rather than the South Coast AQMD 

Rule 1113, the cost to coating manufacturers will be 

significantly lower. Apportioning that cost to 

Ventura County using a population factor (4.1% of 

the state’s population excluding the South Coast 

district), the annualized costs to manufacturers to 

comply with proposed amendments to Rule 74.2 

would be about $505,000 per year. As a comparison 

the Ventura County Gross County Product is about 

$24 billion. This cost of compliance would be 

significantly higher at $893,000 per year to adopt the 

limits in South Coast AQMD Rule 1113 based on a 

cost-effectiveness analysis performed by SCAQMD 

in 2006. 

Cost to Consumers 

CARB Analysis: CARB staff projected the 

maximum potential impact on consumers by 

assuming that all the costs of reformulation in the 

previous section are passed on in the form of higher 

coating price. Using this assumption, the product 

cost increases for all impacted categories ranges from 

a net savings to $6.82 per reformulated gallon with 

an average increase of 30 cents per gallon. The retail 

price increase is estimated using a 4X multiplier if 

both the wholesaler and retailer each double the 

price. Part of this cost increase results from the 

training and service provided by wholesalers and 

retailers to their customers. Thus, the estimated 

maximum retail price increase would range from a 

net savings to $27.30 per reformulated gallon with an 

average increase of $1.21 per gallon as shown in the 

third column of Table 4. Assuming the average retail 

price of noncomplying coatings currently ranges 

from $11.84 to $38.70 per gallon with an average 

price of $19.20, the maximum increase in retail 

prices is 47 percent and the average increase is 

approximately six percent. The largest price 

increases occur at industrial maintenance and other 

commercial coating applications. 

CARB staff also estimated the expected costs to 

consumers. For ordinary consumers who use flat 

house paint, non-flat house paints, and 

Primers/Sealers/Undercoaters, CARB staff projects a 

price ranging from a net savings to a maximum $4.40 

per reformulated gallon with an average potential 

increase of about $1.65 per gallon. They note that 

consumers may purchase currently available 

compliant flat and non-flat coatings with no increase 

in price due to reformulation. The competition 

among suppliers of these coatings will likely 

constrain any price increases from reformulated 

coatings. Thus, costs to consumers from proposed 

amendments to Rule 74.2 should be small. 

SCAQMD Analysis: Results of the SCAQMD 

analysis are similar to the results of the CARB 

analysis. Based on available information, South 

Coast AQMD staff estimated that the Rule 1113 

ROC standards would result in maximum price 
 Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 13

increases for future complying coatings of up to 20 

percent. The 1999 SCAQMD Socioeconomic Report 

for Rule 1113 projects a worst-case 20 percent 

increase across-the-board for all major categories. 

The SCAQMD price determinations for complying 

coatings were supported by information received by 

them from resin suppliers and coating manufacturers. 

The following sources were cited by SCAQMD to 

provide coating price estimates: 

• A case study by Devoe & Reynolds Co. 

published in Stirring Up Innovation (1994) 

noted a 10 percent increase in costs for <250 

g/l industrial maintenance, non-flat and 

wood stain coatings. 

• A Superior Coating paper at the April 28, 

1998, SCAQMD Architectural Coatings 

Technology Conference (Superior 

Performance Coatings) noted a 0 to 10 

percent increase in the cost per gallon of 

zero-ROC non-flat, primer sealer and 

undercoater, rust preventative, industrial 

maintenance and stain coatings. 

• Another paper at the 1998 Architectural 

Coating Technology Conference indicated 

examples of zero-ROC flats, non-flats, 

primer sealer and undercoaters, rust 

preventatives, quick-dry enamels, floor 

coatings, industrial maintenance coatings, 

wood sealers and wood stain coatings that 

have superior or matching coating 

performance while simultaneously reducing 

production and application costs (ROC free 

Paints and Inks at No Extra Cost by G. 

Sugerman of PPA Technologies, a resin 

supplier). 

• Norman Mowrer of Ameron International 

also presented a paper at the 1998 

Technology Conference that reported 

reduced costs for industrial maintenance 

coatings based on cost per performance 

characteristics. 

Conclusion: Although the maximum expected price 

impacts on consumers are significant, the actual cost 

impacts are likely to be small because of competitive 

pricing pressures from existing complying coatings.

Table 4 - Estimates of Projected Maximum Coating Price Increases (ARB, 2007) 

Coating Category Typical NonComplying Cost per 

Gallon 

Cost Increase to 

Consumers per Gallon6

Aluminum Roof $14.63 $1.16 

Bituminous Roof $11.84 $6.43 

Concrete Masonry Sealer $14.09 -$0.88 

Dry Fog $34.86 -$3.96 

Flat $17.81 -$0.33 

Floor $16.96 $27.30 

Mastic Texture $17.72 $8.61 

Non Flat $19.44 $4.40 

Non Flat High Gloss $23.96 -$3.39 

Primer Sealer Undercoater $16.90 $2.51 

Roof $29.94 $1.95 

Rust Preventative $30.30 -$2.51 

Specialty Primer Sealer Undercoater $25.19 -$6.32 

Traffic Marking $14.18 $4.00 

Waterproofing Membrane $33.38 $16.97 

Wood Coatings $38.70 $-$6.34 

Weighted Average $1.21 

 

6

 Cost increase per gallon is four times the sum of raw material cost differences plus recurring costs of 

reformulation plus nonrecurring costs of reformulation divided by the number of noncomplying gallons. 
 Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 14

Cost to Small Business 

The costs of the proposal to small businesses 

including small coating manufacturers, retailers, 

wholesalers, and painting contractors were evaluated 

based on studies performed by CARB and 

SCAQMD. CARB staff again focused on the cost 

incurred by coating manufacturers while the 

SCAQMD evaluated the cost impacts on painting 

contractors. Staff believes that these studies are 

applicable to Ventura County because the economic 

factors affecting architectural coating manufacturers, 

wholesalers, retailers and painting contractors is 

similar to other areas of California. 

CARB Analysis: CARB staff analyzed the impact of 

the SCM on the competitiveness of small business 

coating manufacturers that compete with large 

coating manufacturers. According to CARB staff, 

smaller coating manufacturers tend to cater to niche 

markets that are based on competitive factors other 

than price. These companies depend on specialty 

coatings, brand loyalty, customer service, and other 

non-price related factors. 

According to CARB staff, small business retailers 

and wholesalers generally sell products from all types 

of manufacturers and should be unaffected by 

proposed amendments to Rule 74.2. High 

performance coatings that currently comply with the 

proposed ROC limits are available now from many 

different manufacturers. A list of coatings complying 

with the proposed standards was compiled by CARB 

staff and is shown in Appendix A. Thus, retailers 

should have an ample supply and a variety of 

products to sell. 

SCAQMD Analysis: The SCAQMD staff analyzed 

the cost impacts to painting contractors in their 

analysis of amendments to their Rule 1113. Based on 

data from industry sources, the estimated average 

annual cost of their ROC limits in the South Coast 

district was $32 million dollars to consumers and 

$26.3 million dollars to painting contractors (SIC 

1721) from 2002 through 2015. According to 

SCAQMD staff, painting contractors and consumers 

could incur additional costs beyond these amounts. 

For the painting contractor, it could be the cost of 

training, learning, and testing the new reformulated 

coatings, and litigation costs. These additional costs 

are based on claims made by some coating 

manufacturers and some paint contractors and not on 

any empirical studies. These costs assume coating 

manufacturers pass through all reformulation costs to 

end-users. 

Conclusion: An estimate of cost impacts to painting 

contractors in Ventura County was made by 

assuming that the cost breakdown (consumer vs. 

painting contractor) is similar to that found in the 

South Coast AQMD. This is a reasonable 

assumption because the type and quantity of work 

performed by painting contractors is expected to be 

similar in both regions on a per capita basis. 

SCAQMD staff estimates that 45 percent of the cost 

impact is experienced by painting contractors. Thus, 

the maximum cost impact to Ventura County area 

painting contractors would be 45 percent of 

$505,000, which is $227,000. 

Emission Reduction Potential of the Rule 

The emission reduction potential of proposed 

amendments to Rule 74.2 is estimated at 0.5 tons of 

ROC per day. This estimate is based on the SCM 

ROC reductions 15( tons/day) estimated by CARB 

staff corrected by the population of Ventura County, 

which is 4.1 percent of the population of California 

excluding the South Coast AQMD and corrected by a 

rule effectiveness forecast of 80 percent. The rule 

effectiveness is an estimate of lost emission 

reductions resulting from misuse of the small 

container exemption and misuse of coatings in 

violation of label recommendations. 

Cost-Effectiveness 

Both CARB and SCAQMD staff reported costeffectiveness calculations for the SCM and Rule 1113 

standards, respectively. The SCM, which is based 

partly on SCAQMD Rule 1113, is the basis for 

proposed amendments to Rule 74.2. In addition, 

ARB staff performed a sensitivity analysis with the 

increase in resin costs as the dependent parameter. 

This CARB analysis was performed using resin costs 

increasing at 10 percent, 20 percent, and 50 percent 

per year. Both reports include cost-effectiveness 

values for each of the major coating categories that 

are proposed for amendment. 

The overall cost-effectiveness of the new standards in 

the 2007 SCM is $1.12 per pound of ROC reduced 

according to CARB, which assume a conservative 20 

percent increase in raw material resin costs. This is 

much less than the 1999 projection of $6.65 per 

pound of ROC reduced for SCAQMD Rule 1113 

over the years 2002-2015(based on 1998 Dollars). 

The individual coating category cost-effectiveness 

results from the ARB analysis are summarized in 

Table 5. This table shows that many categories are 
 Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 15

cost-effective and some of them are associated with 

cost savings. The $13.90 per pound ROC reduced for 

Floor Coatings results from the fact that large number 

of noncomplying coatings are sold in small volumes. 

However, the complying share of the floor coating 

market is 85 percent since many manufacturers have 

already reformulated their coatings. Therefore, it is 

reasonable to assume that the remaining 

manufacturers can also reformulate. 

Table 5 - Cost-Effectiveness 

($/lb. ROC Reduced) 

Coating Category CARB 2007 SCM 

Aluminum Roof $0.41 

Bituminous Roof $1.02 

Concrete Masonry Sealer -$0.36 

Dry Fog -$0.52 

Flat -$0.69 

Floor $13.90 

Mastic Texture $2.38 

Non Flat $7.03 

Non Flat High Gloss -$1.38 

Primer/Sealer/Undercoater $2.73 

Roof $1.38 

Rust Preventative -$0.46 

Specialty 

Primer/Sealer/Undercoater 

-$0.71 

Traffic Marking $4.76 

Waterproofing Membrane $6.55 

Wood Coatings -$1.13 

Overall Cost-Effectiveness $1.12 

Conclusion: The cost-effectiveness of proposed 

amendments to Rule 74.2 was calculated based on 

annualized costs projected by ARB staff. The total 

annualized cost was estimated at $505,000 based on 

apportioning manufacturer reformulation costs by the 

population of the county. The ROC emission 

reductions are anticipated to be 0.5 tons per day or 

365,000 pounds per year. Therefore, the costeffectiveness is the ratio of these numbers 

($505,000/365,000 pounds) or $1.38 per pound of 

ROC reduced. This is much less than the $9 per 

pound of ROC reduced that is required for Best 

Available Control Technology for new stationary 

sources in the county. 

Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Analysis 

H & SC Section 40920.6(a) requires districts to 

identify one or more potential control options that 

achieve at least the same benefit as the proposed rule, 

assess the cost-effectiveness of those options, and 

calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness. The 

only alternative that achieves at least the same benefit 

is the adoption of final ROC limits from South Coast 

AQMD Rule 1113. Proposed amendments to Rule 

74.2 are based on the SCM which is not as stringent 

as the ROC limits from SCAQMD Rule 1113. As 

stated earlier, the cost-effectiveness of the ROC 

limits in Rule 1113 is $8.18 per pound of ROC 

reduced. The incremental cost-effectiveness is 

calculated by dividing the incremental annualized 

costs in the district by the incremental annual 

emission reductions in the district. The incremental 

cost-effectiveness for this control option is $15.47 

per pound of ROC reduced. These calculations are 

summarized in Table 6.

Table 6 Calculation of Incremental Cost-Effectiveness for SCAQMD ROC Limits Option 

I. OPTION CONTROL EFFICIENCY = 46% AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS = $8.18 

II. Baseline Inventory = 2.1 tons/day for Ventura County Arch. Coatings 

III. Annualized Cost for Proposal = 0.50 tons/day X $1.38/lb = $505,000 

IV. Option Emission Reductions = 2.1 tons/day X 46% = 705,180 lbs/year 

V. Option Annualized Cost = Cost-Effectiveness X Emis. Reductions 

 = $8.18 X 705,180 lbs/yr = $5,768,372 

VI. Incremental Annualized Cost = $5,768,180 - $505,000 = $5,263,372 

VII. Incremental Annual Emis. Reductions = 705,180 – 365,000= 340,180 lbs/yr 

VIII. Incremental Cost-Effectiveness = $5,263,372 / 340,180 = $15.47 per pound 

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF METHODS OF COMPLIANCE 

California Public Resources Code Section 21159 requires the District to perform an environmental analysis of the 

reasonably foreseeable methods of compliance. The analysis must include the following information on proposed 

amendments to Rule 74.2: 

(1) An analysis of the reasonably foreseeable environmental impacts of the methods of compliance. 

(2) An analysis of the reasonably foreseeable mitigation measures. 
 Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 16

(3) An analysis of the reasonably foreseeable alternative means of compliance with the rule or regulation. 

Table 7 lists some reasonably foreseeable compliance methods, the environmental impacts of those methods, and 

measures that could be used to mitigate the environmental impacts. A more detailed environmental analysis will be 

found in the staff environmental impact report for proposed amendments to Rule 74.2. 

Table 7 

Environmental Impacts and Mitigations of Methods of Compliance 

Compliance Methods (including all 

reasonably foreseeable alternative 

means of compliance) 

Reasonably Foreseeable 

Environmental Impacts 

Reasonably Foreseeable 

Mitigation Measures 

Reformulation of architectural 

coatings 

Air Quality Impacts: Reformulation 

may result in the use of toxic 

materials. 

Operators may use reformulated 

coatings with less or no toxic 

materials. 

 Water Impacts: Improper disposal of 

coatings may cause water impacts. 

Compliance with wastewater 

discharge standards and waste 

disposal requirements will 

mitigate these impacts. 

 Human Health Impacts: Coatings 

may be replaced with products 

containing more toxic compounds. 

Compliance with OSHA safety 

guidelines (e.g., personal 

protective equipment, prevention 

and response, emergency first 

aid procedures) reduces these 

impacts. 

OTHER FACTORS 

Technological Feasibility: 

The ROC limits proposed in the amendments to Rule 

74.2 are based on ROC limits fully analyzed for 

technological feasibility by the Air Resources Board 

in the SCM and by the South Coast AQMD in its 

Rule 1113. Currently, coatings that meet the 

proposed ROC limits are being manufactured and 

sold in California (see CARB’s Staff Report for the 

Proposed Suggested Control Measure for 

Architectural Coatings dated September 2007.) 

Enforceability 

Labeling requirements, reporting requirements, and 

testing procedures have been included in the 

proposed rule to increase its enforceability. 

Public Acceptability 

Staff is soliciting comments, but expects the rule and 

any associated costs to be acceptable to affected 

manufacturers and users for the following reasons: 

• Future effective date for some ROC limits at 

2012 will allow time for manufacturers to 

reformulate, if needed. 

• A three-year sell-through provision will 

allow suppliers, retailers, and users to 

deplete existing coating inventories without 

penalty and without creating a hazardous 

waste problem. 

• High-performance coatings are available 

now from many companies that comply with 

the proposed ROC limits. A list partial list 

of coatings that are compliant with the 

proposed ROC limits was tabulated by ARB 

staff and is provided in Appendix A. 

• Coating price increases as a result of this 

proposal are not expected to be significant. 

• Estimated profitability impacts on coating 

manufacturers are not expected to be 

significant. 
 Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 17

Environmental Compliance and Review 

Proposed amendments to Rule 74.2 strengthen the 

ROC content limits for architectural coatings. The 

rule creates new lower standards for specified coating 

categories. In addition, it will raise the ROC limits 

for a few specified coating categories. The rule may 

have a potentially adverse environmental impact. 

Pursuant to county administrative supplement to state 

CEQA Guidelines, the District staff will propose 

reusing the 2001 Environmental Impact Report 

prepared for the 2001 amendments to Rule 74.2. 

Future Technology Assessments 

ARB and SCAQMD staffs have committed to 

conducting technology assessments for each coating 

category with lower proposed future limits one year 

prior to the effective date of the lowered limits. 

SCAQM has published Rule 1113 status reports on 

their website (aqmd.gov) for the following years: 

2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2007. This 

annual review by SCAQMD staff all proposed 

limits are feasible. However, the District’s 

rulemaking process is flexible enough for staff to 

revisit the rule and to make any appropriate changes 

to the rule as needed in the future. 

REFERENCES 

Air Resources Board, Final Environmental Impact Report 

for the Suggested Control Measure for Architectural 

Coatings (ARB, 2000) 

Air Resources Board, Resolution 07-46, Agenda Item No. 

07-10-5, October 26, 2007. 

Air Resources Board, Staff Report for the Suggested 

Control Measure for Architectural Coatings (ARB, 2007) 

Air Resources Board, Technical Support Document for 

Proposed Amendments to the SCM for Architectural 

Coatings, September 2007. 

Air Resources Board, 2007 Draft Compliant Products 

List. 

Federal Register, “Revisions to the California State 

Implementation Plan: San Joaquin, Ventura and Santa 

Barbara,” September 20, 2002 (Vol. 67 No. 183). 

Goldstene, James. N., Air Resources Board, Letter to Air 

Pollution Control Officers, February 1, 2008. 

Mersburg, Al, “Superior Performance Coatings.” 

Proceedings of the April 28, 1998, Architectural Coatings 

Technology Conference, South Coast AQMD. 

Mowrer, Norman R., Ameron International. “High 

Performance Coatings Based on Epoxy Siloxane Hybrid 

Polymers.” Proceedings of the April 28, 1998, 

Architectural Coatings Technology Conference, 

SCAQMD. 

South Coast AQMD Staff Report for the Amendments to 

Rule 1113, Architectural Coatings, May 1999. 

South Coast AQMD, Socioeconomic Report for the 

Amendments to Rule 1113, Architectural Coatings, May 

1999. 

South Coast AQMD Final Socioeconomic Impact 

Assessment to Proposed Amendments to Rule 1113, 

October 1996. 

Stirring Up Innovation. A case study by Devoe & 

Reynolds Co (Inform Inc. New York, NY, 1994) 

Sugerman, Gerald, “ROC Free Paints and Inks at No 

Extra Cost.” Proceedings of the April 28, 1998, 

Architectural 

Van DeMark, Michael R. and Kathryn Sandefur, “Flat 

Coatings Technology Assessment” UMR Coatings 

Institute, University of Missouri-Rolla. 
Appendix I. (Staff Report Proposed Amendments to Rule 74.2) 

Draft Compliant Products List

compiled by the

California Air Resources Board for the

2007 Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings
DRAFT 

California Air Resources Board 

Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings 

Draft Compliant Product Lists 

The Air Resources Board (ARB) staff is currently working on an update to the Suggested 

Control Measure (SCM) for Architectural Coatings. The SCM is a model rule which has been 

used by California air pollution control districts to develop and amend architectural coating rules. 

During a public workshop on March 13, 2007, ARB staff presented draft proposed changes for 

some of the categories covered by the SCM. These changes included lower VOC limits, draft 

revised definitions, and proposed new categories. Industry representatives requested that ARB 

staff provide a list of products that would comply with the draft proposed changes. In response 

to this request, ARB staff has compiled lists of products that would comply with draft proposed 

changes, as presented at the March 13th workshop. The lists on the following pages include: 

manufacturer or parent company; product name; and VOC Regulatory (grams/liter). This 

information is based on data reported in ARB’s 2005 Architectural Coating Survey, product data 

sheets, and literature searches for new products. Additional product information will be 

compiled in the SCM Staff Report (e.g., product features, usage limitations, etc.). 

Compliant Product Lists are provided for the following categories: 

• Aluminum Roof • Fire Retardant – Opaque • Roof 

• Anti-Graffiti • Flat • Rust Preventative 

• Basement Waterproofer • Floor • Specialty Primer, Sealer, Undercoater 

• Bituminous Roof • Industrial Maintenance • Traffic Marking 

• Concrete/Masonry Sealer • Mastic Texture • Waterproofing Membrane 

• Driveway Sealer • Nonflat – High Gloss • Wood Coatings – Clear 

• Dry Fog • Nonflat 

(Low Gloss & Medium Gloss) 

• Wood Coatings – Opaque 

• Fire Retardant – Clear • Primer, Sealer, Undercoater • Zinc-Rich Primer 

These lists and the associated VOC limits are preliminary drafts and are subject to change. 

Please keep in mind that the number of complying products is not directly related to the 

complying market share, which is based on sales volumes. For example, a short list of products 

may account for the bulk of the sales volume for one category, while a long list of products may 

account for only a small volume of another category. 

For additional information on the SCM revision process, please visit our website at 

http://www.arb.ca.gov/coatings/arch/arch.htm. 

If you have any questions about the SCM revision process, please contact Jim Nyarady, 

Manager, Strategy Evaluation Section, at (916) 322-8273 or jnyarady@arb.ca.gov. 

To provide comments on the draft compliant product lists, please contact Monique Davis at 

(916) 324-8182 or mdavis@arb.ca.gov. 
DRAFT

ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings Compliant Product Lists 

Compliant Product List.doc 2 21-May-07 

ALUMINUM ROOF: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 400 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

APOC Aluminum Roof Coating 382 

APOC Silver Dollar Super Bright 622-GA : Fibered Aluminum 

Roof Coating 377 

APOC Aluminum Roof Coating 382 

APOC Asphalt Emulsion Aluminum 115 

APOC Silver Dollar 629-GA Waterbased Fibered Aluminum Roof 

Coating 115 

APOC Silver Dollar 621-GA : Fibered Aluminum Roof Coating 377 

APOC Black Jack Silver-Seal 500: 5180 Premium Waterbased 

Aluminum Coating 5 

APOC Sunbrite Aluminum Roof Coating- APOC 400 115 

Elastomeric Roofing Systems, Inc. Erathane 300 Finish Coat 327 

Henry Company Economy Fibered Aluminum 389 

Henry Company Aluminum Emulsion 46 

Tremco Incorporated Vulkem 801 240 

ANTI-GRAFFITI: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 150 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Gaco Western, Inc. S-14 50 

RainGuard International Products 

Co, VandlGuard Non-Sacrificial Graffiti Coating 60 

Scofield Systems Repello 100 

SEI Chemical GPA-200 100 

SEI Chemical GPC-100 50 

SEI Chemical GPC-101 50 

Textured Coatings of America Graffitigard IIIW 143 

Thortex America, Inc. Wall-Tech A.G. Water-Based Polyurethane 65 

Visual Pollution Technologies, Inc. Prmakote 15 

BASEMENT WATERPROOFER: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 400 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Dap Inc. Kwik Seal Plus Basement Paint 140 

Fiberlock Technologies, Inc. IAQ 9000 Mold-Resistant Masonry Waterproofer 156 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) 

Confil HD Interior/Exterior Masonry Waterproofing 

Coating 397 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Tru-Glaze 4010 Waterproofing Base Coat & Filler 397 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Colorplace Latex Waterproofing Basement Paint 83 

Sherwin-Williams Co. H&C Block Shield Masonry Waterproofer 125 

United Gilsonite Drylok Masonry Waterproofer 100 

United Gilsonite Drylok Oil Base Masonry Waterproofer 388 
DRAFT

ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings Compliant Product Lists 

Compliant Product List.doc 3 21-May-07 

BASEMENT WATERPROOFER: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 400 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Zinsser Okon Waterstopper 90 

Zinsser WaterTite 384 

Zinsser WaterTite - LV 92 

BITUMINOUS ROOF: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 50 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

APOC Asphalt Emulsion 3 

APOC Elastomeric Asphalt Emulsion Coating 4 

APOC Modified Emulsion 4 

APOC Aqua-Tec Roof & Foundation Coating 1 

APOC Non-Fibered Asphalt Emulsion 4 

APOC Fibered Asphalt Emulsion Roof Coating 4 

Fields Company LLC Powrgard 0 

Garland Company GarlaShield 0 

Henry Company Asphalt Emulsion, WB 0 

Karnak Corp. Fibered Emulsion Coating 0 

Koppers Inc. Coal Tar Pitch 0 

Mule-Hide Products Co. Mule Hide 301 Fibrated Emulsion; Mule-Hide 311 Non 

Fibrated Emulsion 0 

Sherwin-Williams Co. KST Coatings UV Resistant Black Patch & Coat 4 

Southwestern Petroleum 

Corporation SWEPCO Flex Shield Roof Coating 0 

Tremco Incorporated Tremlastic, Tremlastic S, Permaflex S 47 

CONCRETE/MASONRY SEALER: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Benjamin Moore & Co. 

Moorlastic 100% Acrylic Elastomeric Waterproofing 

Coating, Low Lustre 055 and Flat 056 * 98 

Benjamin Moore & Co. Moorlastic Acrylic Elastomeric - Fine Texture 060 50 

Cal Western Paints, Inc. Alldeck Deck Coatings 20 

Cal Western Paints, Inc. Duraflex Elastomeric Texture Coating 89 

Cal Western Paints, Inc. Waterguard Clear Water Resistant Sealer 10 

ChemMasters ColorLastic 48 

Cloverdale Towerthon Plus Elastomeric Coating * 75 

Columbia Paint & Coatings Elastech 100% Acrylic Elastomeric Coating * 96 

Columbia Paint & Coatings Flex Pro Elastomeric Coating * 64 

Conklin Company, Inc. Wall-Up Acrylic Latex Coating for Masonry Walls 61 

Conspec Conspec Weatherseal WB 0 

Conspec Spectrum WB 3 

Davlin Coatings, Inc. Acrylastic 490 75 

Dayton Superior Weather Worker WB Heavy Duty (J-27-WB) 0 
DRAFT

ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings Compliant Product Lists 

Compliant Product List.doc 4 21-May-07 

CONCRETE/MASONRY SEALER: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Degussa Building Systems Flexcoat 89 

Degussa Building Systems Flextex 78 

Degussa Building Systems Mastertop CST 0 

Degussa Building Systems Silflex 79 

Degussa Building Systems Thoroclear Special 0 

Degussa Building Systems Thorolastic * 50 

Degussa Building Systems Tuf-Trac 62 

Diamond Vogel Permaflex Elastomeric Coating * 83 

Drummond American Corporation Cloak Invisible Concrete Protector 0 

Duron Duracrete Masonry Waterproofing Sealer * 47 

Duron MaxFlex Elastomeric Coating * 72 

Eco Safety Products, LLC Acri-Soy Penetrating Clear Satin Sealer 25 

Eco Safety Products, LLC Eco-Tuff Acrylic-Urethane High Traffic Clear Coat 0 

Eco-Wares Inc. Trojan Color Sealer 100 

Eco-Wares Inc. Trojan Masonry Sealer 0 

Edoco Burke Shield 244 WB 0 

Epmar Corp. Kemiko Stone Tone Sealer 30 

Euclid Chemical Company Euco-Guard VOX 26 

Gaco Western, Inc. Gacoflex U-62 0 

Gaco Western, Inc. Gacoflex UA-7090 48 

General Paint Elasto-Wall * 88 

Genesis Coatings Resource GCR 3 Clear Topcoat 0 

Glaze 'N Seal Products "Natural Look" Penetrating Sealer 0 

Glaze 'N Seal Products Stone Sealant Impregnator 0 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Decra-Flex 300 Elastomeric Coating System 70 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) 

Hydro-Shur Waterproofing Systems Hydrolastic 

Elastomeric Waterproofing Coating, DRH5702 Smooth 55 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) 

Hydro-Shur Waterproofing Systems Hydrolastic 

Elastomeric Waterproofing Coating, DRH5802 Textured 70 

Green Building Supply GBS Penetrating Sealer 0 

Gulf Coast Paint Mfg. 

Poly-Chem PC-1803 Clear 100% Solids Epoxy Concrete 

Glaze Coating 4 

Henry Company HE-785 Asphalt Emulsion Trowel Grade 37 

Henry Company HE-788 Non-Fibered Asphalt Emulsion Damproofing 0 

Jasco Chemical Corp. Water Sealant III 0 

Jones-Blair Co. Neogard FC7500 Fast-Cure Polyurethane Base Coat 3 

Jones-Blair Co. Neogard FC7510 Fast-Cure Polyurethane Topcoat 21 

Jones-Blair Co. 

Neogard FC7520 Fast-Cure Aromatic-Aliphatic Urethane 

Topcoat 89 

Jones-Blair Co. 

Neogard FC7530 Fast-Cure Aliphatic Polyurethane 

Topcoat 35 

Jones-Blair Co. 

Neogard FC7530 Fast-Cure Aliphatic Polyurethane 

Topcoat 34 

Jones-Blair Co. 

Neogard FC7530 Fast-Cure Aliphatic Polyurethane 

Topcoat 34 

Kelly-Moore Paint Co., Inc. 77 Kel-Seal Clear Masonry Water Repellent 0 

Kelly-Moore Paint Co., Inc. 

Kel-Seal Terpolymer 100% Acrylic Elastomeric Coating 

(Textured) * 100 

Kwal Paint Accu-Pro 100% Acrylic EMC Elasto-Wall * 69 
DRAFT

ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings Compliant Product Lists 

Compliant Product List.doc 5 21-May-07 

CONCRETE/MASONRY SEALER: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Kwal Paint Accu-Pro WB Interior/Exterior Clear Acrylic Sealer * 84 

Kwal Paint Eloxatron X Water Repellent Clear * 10 

Life Paint Company Stretch-Guard 92 Series Smooth Elastomeric Wall Coating 77 

McCormick Paints Acrytex Interior/Exterior 100% Acrylic Texture Coating * 100 

Merlex MicroSeal II 0 

Monopole Inc. Monochem Dex-Coat * 50 

Moxie International Moxie 1500 Concrete Sealer 0 

Moxie International Moxie Floor Sealer II 0 

NCH Corporation Beauti-Trac Nonskid Epoxy Emulsion Floor Coating 65 

NCH Corporation Inner Strength Penetrating Concrete Treatment 1 

NCH Corporation Kolor-Traction Nonskid Epoxy Emulsion Floor Coating 40 

New Image Coatings, LLC Seal-Once Concrete/Masonry Waterproofer 0 

Niagara Protective Coatings 2K Acrylic Urethane W.B. 5 

Niagara Protective Coatings 

Epoxal 100 Systems (HP-High Performance; WH-Work 

Horse; CR-Chemical Resistant) 0 

Pacific Polymers International Elasto-Tex Deck Coating 84 

Pacific Polymers International Elasto-Tex Wallcoating 68 

Parker Paint EMC Elastomeric * 80 

Poly-Carb, Inc. Mark-135.1 0 

Poly-Carb, Inc. Mark-154 0 

Ponderosa Paint Co., Inc. Agg-Epox 9000 0 

Ponderosa Paint Co., Inc. Agg-Epox Sealer 9100 2 

Ponderosa Paint Co., Inc. Perma-Floor 9200 12 

PPG Industries, Inc. Perma-Crete 100% Acrylic Texture Coating * 57 

PPG Industries, Inc. Perma-Crete High Build 100% Acrylic Topcoat 98 

PPG Industries, Inc. Perma-Crete Pitt-Flex Elastomeric Coating * 98 

Preserva Products, Ltd. Preserva-Crete 30 

Rock-Tred Agua-Rock 46 

Rock-Tred Chem-Rock Seal/Coat LV 1 

Rock-Tred Exteseal 0 

Rock-Tred Novo-Brite 12 

Rock-Tred Novo-Poxi 12 

Rock-Tred Penetred 0 

Rodda Paint Super Roflex Elastomeric Coating * 89 

Rodda Paint Super Roflex Texture Coating 79 

Rust-Oleum Corp. Sierra Performance Gloss Concrete Epoxy Floor Coating * 0 

Seal-Krete Concrete/Garage Floor Sealer 91 

Seal-Krete Heavy-Duty Waterproofer 33 

Seal-Krete Original Waterproofing Sealer 21 

Sherwin-Williams Co. H&C WB-50 Water Based Water Repellent 0 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Pro-Hide Gold Exterior Elastomeric Coating 100 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Thompson's Water Seal Concrete Care Sealer 44 

Sierra Corp. TK-290 WB Tri-Siloxane 60 

Sika Corporation Sikadur 21 Lo-Mod LV 75 

Sika Corporation Sikadur 22 Lo-Mod 56 

Sika Corporation Sikagard 670W 77 

Sika Corporation Sikagard 701W 43 

Sinak Corporation Sinak Concrete Sealer S-102 0 

Sinak Corporation Sinak LS-825 0 
DRAFT

ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings Compliant Product Lists 

Compliant Product List.doc 6 21-May-07 

CONCRETE/MASONRY SEALER: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Sinak Corporation Sinak Sealer HLQ-125 0 

Spectra-Tone Paint Corp. 

Zaptex 100% Acrylic High Build Waterproofing 

Elastomeric Coating #230 & #235 * 82 

Sto Corp Stolastic 212 Smooth 76 

Surface Protection Industries Inc. Polyplex Overglo Clear Glaze 56 

Symons Siloxane/Silane 20% WB 0 

Tamms Industries Baracade WB 244 50 

Tamms Industries Chemstop WB * 50 

Tamms Industries Tammolastic * 50 

Tamms Industries Tammscoat 50 

Textured Coatings of America Strata Grip 80 

Textured Coatings of America TexCote Stretch 74 

Textured Coatings of America TexCote SuperCote Cool Wall 50 

ThorWorks Industries, Inc. Sealmaster ColorPave 59 

ThorWorks Industries, Inc. Sealmaster ColorPave HD500 71 

Tnemec Company Inc. Deco-Clear Series 284 28 

Tnemec Company Inc. Deco-Fleck Series 224 18 

Tnemec Company Inc. Deco-Tread Series 222 18 

Tnemec Company Inc. Power-Tread FC Series 238 32 

Tnemec Company Inc. Power-Tread Series 237 30 

Tnemec Company Inc. Satinglaze Series 285 21 

Tremco Incorporated Decktite WDS Water Dispersed Silane Sealer 0 

Tremco Incorporated Solargard Hy-Build 80 

Tremco Incorporated Vulkem 345 NF Elastomer, Waterproof Traffic Bearing 71 

Tremco Incorporated 

Vulkem 351 NF Neighbor Friendly Low Odor/No VOC 

Pedestrian Deck Coating System and Vulkem 346 NF 

Elastomeric, Waterproof Traffic Bearing 70 

Tremco Incorporated Wall-Tite 12 

Tremco Incorporated Wall-Tite F 80 

True Value Manufacturing Tru-Seal Clear Waterproofer for Masonry (CS-4) 14 

United Coatings Manufacturing Co. Aquathon 10 

United Coatings Manufacturing Co. Rhino Top Acrylic/Epoxy Emulsion Coating 92 

Valspar Corporation Water Sealer 94 

Versatile Building Products 4001 Epoxy Sealer/Primer 22 

Versatile Building Products 4010 Monolithic Concrete Coating System (MCCS) 49 

Versatile Building Products Versaglaze 100 

Versatile Building Products Waterborne CRU 5400 and 5410 45 

Vista Paint Corporation 1900 Weather Master * 89 

W.R. Meadows Inc. Sealtight Sealmastic 0 

*MPI Approved Product 

DRIVEWAY SEALER: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 50 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

APOC Gardner 055-GA: Blacktop Driveway Crack Filler 6 

APOC Crack Stopper 057-GA: Blacktop Elastomeric Crack Filler 5 
DRAFT

ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings Compliant Product Lists 

Compliant Product List.doc 7 21-May-07 

DRIVEWAY SEALER: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 50 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

APOC Drive-Kote Driveway Filler & Sealer 4 

APOC Gardner Pro-Gel 068-GA 9 

APOC Black Jack 6414: Asphalt Emulsion Driveway Sealer - 1 

year 

8 

APOC Emulsion Driveway Filler Sealer 7 

APOC Driveway Blacktop Sealer 8 

APOC Black Jack Freeway 6426: Blacktop Driveway Sealer - 4 

year 

7 

APOC Black Jack Speedway 6427: Advanced Gel Driveway 

Sealer - 6 year 9 

APOC Black Jack 6435: Blacktop Crack Filler 6 

APOC Pourable Driveway Crack Sealer 5 

APOC Driveway Sealer 9 

APOC Gardner Drive-Kote: E-Z Stir Driveway Sealer -3 year 7 

APOC Raceway Filler Sealer Driveway Sealer 4 

Cal Western Paints, Inc. Asphalt Emulsion Sealer 5 

Conklin Company, Inc. Master Guard Asphalt Sealer 11 

Conklin Company, Inc. Master Guard Pourable Crack Filler 8 

Conklin Company, Inc. Master Guard Trowelable Crack Filler 11 

Henry Company Asphalt Emulsion Driveway Sealer 0 

Henry Company Asphalt Emulsion Driveway Sealer w/VOC 23 

Henry Company Coal Tar Pitch Sealer 3 

NCH Corporation Texite 111; Top Guard; Strong Seal 0 

ThorWorks Industries, Inc. Coal Tar Sealer 42 

ThorWorks Industries, Inc. LV Pavement Sealer 12 

ThorWorks Industries, Inc. MasterSeal E.Z. Stir 3 

ThorWorks Industries, Inc. MasterSeal Ready Mix 4 

ThorWorks Industries, Inc. MasterSeal 3 

ThorWorks Industries, Inc. Polymer Modified Coal Tar Sealer 41 

DRY FOG: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 150 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Benjamin Moore & Co M53S Sweep-Up Spray Latex Semi Gloss 40 

Dunn-Edwards Aquafall Latex Dry Fog Eggshell 50 

Dunn-Edwards Aquafall Latex Dry Fog Flat 30 

Frazee Industries Latex Dry Fall Flat White 49 

Glidden Company 

Spraymaster Pro Uni-Grip-WB Aquacrylic Dryfall Eggshell 

Primer & Finish 26 

Glidden Company 

Spraymaster Pro Uni-Grip-WB Aquacrylic Dryfall Flat 

Primer & Finish 27 

Glidden Company 

Spraymaster Pro Uni-Grip-WB Aquacrylic Dryfall SemiGloss Primer & Finish 39 

Kelly-Moore Paint Co., Inc. Dry Fog II Flat Maintenance Finish 50 

Vista Paint Corporation DF 12 Dry Fall Water-Based Flat 130 
DRAFT

ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings Compliant Product Lists 

Compliant Product List.doc 8 21-May-07 

FIRE RETARDANT - CLEAR: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 50 g/l 

Manufacturer or Parent 

Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

FireTect WT-103 Flame Retardant Clear Matte Coating. 47 

Flame Control Coatings, LLC 

No. 133 Class “B” Water Base Fire Retardant Polyurethane 

Varnish 24 

Flame Stop Flame Stop I 0 

Flame Stop Flame Stop I-DS 0 

Flame Stop Flame Stop II 0 

Hy-Tech Thermal Solutions Hy-Tech Flame Resist Flame Retardant Coating 0 

FIRE RETARDANT - OPAQUE: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 50 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Benjamin Moore & Co. 220 (M59) Latex Fire Retardant Coating 0 

Cal Western Paints, Inc. Latex Opaque Fire Retardant BF200 46 

GCI International, Inc. Coustic Coat (12 Opaque Fire Retardant) 11 

NoFire Technologies, Inc. NoFire A18 40 

PPG Industries, Inc. Latex Fire Retardant Paint 42-7* 32 

Thermal Product Research Fire Heatshedder 0 

Thermal Product Research Firesafe Non-Flammable fire retardant paint 0 

Thermal Product Research Non-Flammable Exterior Topcoat 0 

W.R. Grace & Co. - Conn. Flame Safe FS 3000 Firestop Coating 26 

FLAT: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 50 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Alistagen Corporation Caliwel with BNA Antimicrobial Interior Latex Covering 0 

Benjamin Moore & Co. 219 Eco Spec Interior Latex Flat 0 

Best Paint Co., Inc. Microsol 2020 Flat Interior Latex 0 

California Paint 

Fresh Coat Low odor Low VOC Acrylic Latex Flat with 

Microban 15 

Conco Paints Pure Low Odor Interior Flat Acrylic Wall & Ceiling Paint 0 

Dunn Edwards Walltone Interior Latex Flat Paint W420 35 

Dunn Edwards Paint Ecoshield Low Odor/ Zero VOC Interior Latex Flat Paint 10 

Dunn Edwards Paint Super-Wall Interior Latex Flat Paint W6420 50 

Dunn Edwards Paint Super-Wall Ready To Use Interior Latex Flat Paint W6403 50 

Dunn Edwards Paint Ultra-Scrub Interior Scrubbable Latex Flat Paint W6400 50 

Duron Paints Genesis Odor Free Interior Acrylic Latex Flat 35 

Evr-Gard Coatings 1400 Flat Evrcare 0 

Frazee Envirokote Low Odor- Low VOC Flat Finish 10 

Green Planet Paints Clay Paint Interior Matte Wall Paint 0 

ICI Paints 6400 Ultra-Hide Speed-Wall Latex Flat Interior Wall Paint 24 

ICI Paints Lifemaster 2000 Interior Flat 0 

ICI Paints Speed-Wall Latex Flat Interior Wall Paint 1250-XX 18 
DRAFT

ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings Compliant Product Lists 

Compliant Product List.doc 9 21-May-07 

FLAT: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 50 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

ICI Paints- Fuller O Brien Crown Coat Interior-Exterior Flat Latex Finish FOB 802-10 18 

ICI Paints- Fuller O Brien Interior Flat Latex Wall Paint 600 18 

ICI Paints- Fuller O Brien Liquid Ceiling Interior Acrylic Latex Matte Flat Paint 109 18 

ICI Paints- Glidden 

Devoe Paint Wonder-Hide Interior/Exterior Flat Paint 

DR533XX 37 

ICI Paints- Glidden FOB 600-X Interior Flat Latex Wall Paint 18 

ICI Paints- Glidden Promaster MP 6400 Flat Latex Wall and Ceiling Paint 35 

ICI Paints- Glidden 

Speed-Cote Exterior Latex Flat Masonry Finish 2240-

XXXX 22 

ICI Paints- Glidden Speed-Wall Latex Matte Flat Interior Wall Paint 1251 33 

ICI Paints- Glidden 

Ultra-Hide Airless High Build Latex Flat Interior 

Primer/Finish 1260-XXXX 46 

ICI Paints- Glidden 

Wonder Pure No VOC/Odor Interior Flat Wall Paint DR 

31XX 0 

Insl-x Coronado Paint Air Care Odorless AcrylicFlat 0 

Kelly Moore Paint Co., Inc. 119 Kel Pro Interior Latex Flat Wall 45 

Kelly Moore Paint Co., Inc. 1500 Enviro-Cote Interior Acrylic Flat Wall Paint 15 

Kelly Moore Paint Co., Inc. 485 Ezy-Coat Interior Acrylic Flat Wall Paint 35 

Kwal Paint EnviroKote Interior Latex Flat 45 

MAB Paints Enviro-Pure Latex Flat 0 

Old Masters Health Kote Interior Latex Flat 0 

PPG Pure Performance Interior Flat Latex 0 

PPG Industries, Inc 14-110 Speedpro Interior Wall & Ceiling Flat Latex 17 

PPG Industries, Inc 57-610 Builder's Spec High Build Interior Flat Latex 32 

PPG Industries, Inc Pittsburg Paints Interior Ceiling Paint Flat Latex 24 

PPG Industries, Inc Speedcraft Interior Wall & Ceiling Flat Latex 5-70 Series 32 

PPG Industries, Inc Speedhide Interior Wall Flat Latex 6-70 Series 17 

PPG Industries, Inc UC65307 Builders Hi Build Interior Touch Up Flat Latex 42 

PPG Industries, Inc UC80021 Speedhide Interior Low Odor Wall Flat Latex 17 

PPG Industries, Inc (Porter) Pro-Master 2000 Flat Wall Interior Latex Wall Paint 50 

Rodda Paint Horizon Flat Interior Wall Paint 0 

Rodda Paint Horizon Pearl Lustre Interior Wall Paint 563501 0 

Rodda Paint Interior Flat Wall Paint- White Base 33663 46 

Rodda Paint Master Painter Pearl Luster 49 

Sherwin Williams AcryShell 100% Acrylic Exterior Latex Flat 42 

Sherwin Williams Cal-Scrub Interior Scrubbable Flat 50 

Sherwin Williams Color Accents Interior Latex Flat Y10 Series 50 

Sherwin Williams Duration Home Interior Latex Matte A96-100 Series 37 

Sherwin Williams Harmony Interior Latex Flat B5 Series 0 

Sherwin Williams ProMar 200 XP Interior Latex Flat 49 

Sherwin Williams ProMar 700 Interior Latex Flat 41 

Sherwin Williams ProTouch Interior Latex Flat 49 

Sico Interior Latex Paint 100% Acrylic- Design Finish 0 

Southern Diversified Products LLC American Pride Paint Interior Flat Latex Paint 0 

Southern Diversified Products LLC American Pro Professional Grade Interior Latex Paint 0 

Spectra Tone Eagle Odorless No VOC Solvent Free Flat Interior 0 

United Coatings Manufacturing Co Century 2000 30 

Vista Paint Corporation 2000 Duratone 17 

Vista Paint Corporation 2800 Coverall Exterior Flat 46 
DRAFT

ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings Compliant Product Lists 

Compliant Product List.doc 10 21-May-07 

FLAT: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 50 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Vista Paint Corporation 3600 Coverall Maintenance Flat 44 

Vista Paint Corporation 6100 Carefree Earth Coat Flat 6 

Yolo Colorhouse Yolo Colorhouse Flat Interior Paint 0 

FLOOR: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Advanced Polymer Technology 

Corp. Qualipur 5401 3 

Advanced Polymer Technology 

Corp. Qualipur 5511 Unipack 14 

Behr Process Corporation 1-Part Epoxy Concrete & Garage Floor Paint 97 

Behr Process Corporation Premium Plus Porch & Floor Paint 48 

Cal Western Paints, Inc. 

Latex Epoxy Deck Paint and Top Coat Non-Skid Deck 

Coating - Slurry Finish 58 

Cal Western Paints, Inc. Tennis Court Coatings 70 

Color Wheel Paint Manufacturing 

Company Latex Floor Paint 100 

Eco Safety Products, LLC Eco Procote Eco-Tuff Rubberized Non Skid Safety Coating 0 

Eco Safety Products, LLC Non Skid Acrylic-Polyurethane Wood Coating 0 

Ellis Paint Company 2K Epoxy Floor Coating 0 

General Paint Porch and Floor Enamel Acrylic Latex * 68 

General Paint Spantex Deck Coating Acrylic Latex * 83 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) 

Groundworks Interior/Exterior Water-Based Porch & Floor 

Satin Enamel * 89 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) 

Groundworks Water-Based Acrylic Anti-Skid Porch & 

Floor Coating 75 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Porch & Floor Acrylic Latex Satin * 89 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Porch & Floor Interior/Exterior Acrylic Satin Enamel * 89 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Porch & Floor Latex Satin 89 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Spred Floor Acrylic Latex 89 

Kelley Technical Coatings, Inc. Patio Deck Tones 80 

PPG Industries, Inc. Floor, Porch & Deck Satin Latex 95 

PPG Industries, Inc. Latex Floor Paint 83 

Rust-Oleum Corp. EpoxyShield Garage Floor Coating 84 

Scotch Paint Corp Acrilox 100% Acrylic Floor Paint 99 

Seal-Krete Epoxy-Seal Concrete & Garage Floor Paint 93 

Seal-Krete Floor-Tex Non-Slip Textured Coating 80 

Sherwin-Williams Co. 

Colorplace Interior/Exterior Latex Satin Porch & Floor 

Paint 81 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Latex Satin Porch & Floor Enamel 99 

Sherwin-Williams Co. 

Performer Porch, Floor & Deck Latex Flat Interior/Exterior 

Enamel 99 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Porch & Floor Enamel Interior/Exterior 50 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Weatherbeater Porch, Floor, & Deck Latex 72 

Simpson Coatings Group, Inc. Deco-Tex Non-Skid Coating 98 
DRAFT

ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings Compliant Product Lists 

Compliant Product List.doc 11 21-May-07 

FLOOR: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Spectra-Tone Paint Corp. Industron 100% Acrylic Patio & Deck Paint #900 97 

United Gilsonite Laboratories Drylok Concrete Floor Paint 90 

Valspar Corporation American Tradition Latex Floor 92 

Valspar Corporation 

American Tradition Skid Not Interior/Exterior Skid 

Resistant Coating 99 

Valspar Corporation Colorplace Anti-Skid 100 

Valspar Corporation Colorplace Latex Floor 93 

Valspar Corporation Colorplace Oil Floor Satin 93 

Valspar Corporation Skid Resistant Finish 99 

Valspar Corporation Valspar Latex Floor Enamel 92 

Versatile Building Products 4800 Epoxy Sealer 2 

Versatile Building Products 5073 Polyurea Sealer 50 

Vista Paint Corporation 400 Acripoxy 80 

*MPI Approved Product 

INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 250 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Ameron International 2 Amerlock 153 

Ameron International 335 Amercoat 206 

Ameron International 351 Amercoat 1 

Ameron International 400 Amerlock 163 

Ameron International 700 PSX 6 

Ameron International 78HB Amercoat 241 

Ameron International Amershield 196 

Ameron International Amershield VOC 161 

Benjamin Moore & Co. M45, M4684 Epoxy Mastic Coating 185 

C.I.M. Industries Inc. CIM 1000 91 

Carboline Company Bitumastic 300M 223 

Carboline Company Carboguard 875 HS & GATX 154 

Carboline Company Carboguard 890 202 

Carboline Company Carboguard 891 217 

Carboline Company Carbothane 134 VOC 189 

Carboline Company Nullifire S607 158 

Carboline Company Phenoline 309 4 

Carboline Company Plasite 4100/4110 57 

Carboline Company Plasite 4500 0 

Carboline Company Plasite 9052 183 

Carboline Company Plasite 9060 122 

Carboline Company Polibrid 705 0 

Degussa Building Systems Thoroc IC2480 49 

Degussa Building Systems Thoroc IC5400 0 

Epmar Corp. SS1515-1 Black 0 

Gaco Western, Inc. LM60 0 

ICI 4208 Devflex QD Waterborne Gloss Enamel 215 

ICI Bar Rust 235H Multipurpose Epoxy Coating 234 
DRAFT

ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings Compliant Product Lists 

Compliant Product List.doc 12 21-May-07 

INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 250 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

ICI Devflex 4205 Interior Exterior Acrilic Latex 136 

ICI Devflex 4206 QD Waterborne Semigloss Enamel 225 

ICI Devran 224 HS Epoxy High Build Coating 222 

ICI Devran 724 Gloss Epoxy Coating 211 

ICI Devthane 379H Aliphatic Urethane Gloss Enamel 238 

ICI Tru-Glaze WB 4030 Epoxy Primer 193 

ICI Tru-Glaze WB 4406 Semi-gloss Epoxy 198 

ICI Tru-Glaze WB 4408 Waterborne Epoxy Gloss 227 

International Coatings ICO Guard Coatings 0 

International Paint LLC/Akzo Nobel 

Coatings Intercryl 530/520 WB 213 

International Paint LLC/Akzo Nobel 

Coatings Intergard 735 162 

ITW Devcon Epoxy Coat 7000 AR 0 

ITW Devcon Epoxy Coat 7000 Non-VOC 55 

ITW Devcon Styrothane 5324 1 

ITW Devcon Ultrachrome 452S 131 

ITW Philadelphia Resins Impax 3300 LV-N 44 

ITW Philadelphia Resins Impax 650 SL 0 

JFB Hart Coatings, Inc. GlossTek-100 Clear 56 

Jones-Blair Co. Multi-Grip 2 Acrylic Primer 200 

Milamar Coatings, LLC PM400 145 

Pittsburg Paints 90-374 Pitt-Tech Latex Gloss 188 

Pittsburg Paints 95-812 Pitthane Ultra Gloss Urethane Enamels 241 

Pittsburg Paints 98-1 Aquapon WB 250 

Polymerica,Inc. MasterShield Epoxy Primer Sealer 0 

Rust-Oleum Corp. 3100 Speedy Dry Top Coat 225 

Rust-Oleum Corp. 5300 WB Epoxy 179 

Rust-Oleum Corp. Epoxy Shield Base 220 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Bond-Plex Water Based Acrylic Coating 186 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Centurion Water-Based Urethane 87 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Corothane I - Ironox A HS CA 242 

Sherwin-Williams Co. DTM Bonding Primer 43 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Dura-Plate UHS Clear Laminant 169 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Hi-Solids Polyurethane Gloss CA 235 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Macropoxy 646 Fast Cure Epoxy 225 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Macropoxy 646 NSF Fast Cure Epoxy 224 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Metalatex Semi-Gloss Coating 100 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Pro-Cryl Universal Primer 89 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Sher-Clear 1K Acrylic Clearcoat 100 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Sher-Cryl HPA High Performance Acrylic 176 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Sher-Tile HS High Solids Epoxy Coating 250 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Tank Clad HS 249 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Tar Guard Coal Tar Epoxy 221 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Water Based Catalyzed Epoxy 140 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Waterbased Tile-Clad Epoxy Finish 186 

Sigma Coatings USA B.V. Sigma Edgeguard 13 

Sigma Coatings USA B.V. Sigma Edgeguard Primer 13 

Sigma Coatings USA B.V. Sigmacover TCP 232 
DRAFT

ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings Compliant Product Lists 

Compliant Product List.doc 13 21-May-07 

INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 250 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Sika Corporation Sika Proof Seal 0 

Sika Corporation SikaTop Seal 107 76 

StonCor Group, Inc. Primer Standard 8 

StonCor Group, Inc. Stonblend RTZ 10 

StonCor Group, Inc. Stonclad GS 56 

StonCor Group, Inc. Stonglaze VSC 72 

StonCor Group, Inc. Stonkote GS4 0 

StonCor Group, Inc. Stonkote HT4 0 

StonCor Group, Inc. Stonlux AT 41 

Tennant Company Eco-HPS 120 

Tennant Company Eco-MPE 2 

Tnemec Company Inc. Series 1075 Endura-Shield II 220 

Tnemec Company Inc. Series 141 Pota-Pox 80 157 

Tnemec Company Inc. Series 166 Epoxoline HS 171 

Tnemec Company Inc. Series 18 Enviro-Prime 180 

Tnemec Company Inc. Series 280 Tneme-Glaze 23 

Tnemec Company Inc. Series 297 Enviro-Glaze 109 

Tnemec Company Inc. Series 30 Spra-Saf EN 192 

Tnemec Company Inc. Series 406 Elasto-Shield 21 

Tnemec Company Inc. Series 46H Hi-Build Tneme-Tar 229 

Tnemec Company Inc. Series 84 Cremlon ENV 181 

Tnemec Company Inc. Series V140 Pota-Pox Plus 233 

Tnemec Company Inc. Series V69 Hi-Build Epoxoline II 233 

Trinity Coatings Co. Gray W/B Primer 231 

Trinity Coatings Co. Red Oxide Primer 205 

United Coatings Manufacturing Co. Elastuff 120 0 

Vista Paint Corporation Premogloss 167 

MASTIC TEXTURE: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Davlin Coatings, Inc. Acrylastic 490TC 30 

Dunn-Edwards Flex-Tex Texture Coating * 58 

EVR-Gard Coatings 119 Elastomeric Wall Coating 70 

Frazee Industries 

EMC Elasto-Wall Textured: Exterior Elastomeric Texture 

Finish * 63 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) 

Ultra-Hide Buildtex Interior/Exterior High-Build Acrylic 

Latex Texture Coating * 84 

Kelly-Moore Paint Co., Inc. 1112 Kel-Tex * 75 

Kwal Paint Tilt-Tex V 100% Acrylic Texture Coating * 71 

ParexLahabra, Inc. LaHabra Acrylic Finish 10 

ParexLahabra, Inc. LaHabra Elastomeric Finish 7 

Textured Coatings of America TexCote 400 96 

Vista Paint Corporation 500 Solotex * 68 

*MPI Approved Product 
DRAFT

ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings Compliant Product Lists 

Compliant Product List.doc 14 21-May-07 

NONFLAT – HIGH GLOSS: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 125 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Dunn Edwards Spartagloss Interior/Exterior Acrylic Gloss Paint 89 

Dunn Edwards Versagloss 125 

ICI Paints 

Dulux Advanced Oil Interior/Exterior Semi-Gloss Wall & 

Trim Enamel 100 

ICI Paints 

Mirrolac Speed Interior/Exterior Alkyd Gloss Enamel 

DP74XX 120 

ICI Paints Modified Acrylic Interior/Exterior Gloss Enamel 93 

ICI Paints - Dulux 

Dulux Advanced Oil Interior/Exterior Gloss Wall & Trim 

Enamel 120 

Kelly Moore Paint Co., Inc. 1600 Kel-Namel Interior Latex Gloss Enamel 110 

Sherwin Williams Co. SuperPaint Exterior High Gloss Latex Enamel A85 Series 98 

Sherwin Williams Co. 

The Look High Gloss Oil Modified Acrylic Enamel 

B39WJ351 100 

Vista Paint Corporation 7600 Coverall Latex 49 

Vista Paint Corporation 8500 Carefree Gloss 119 

NONFLAT (LOW GLOSS): 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Ace Hardware Corporation 185A Quality Touch Satin Wall & Trim 50 

Benjamin Moore & Co. Eco Spec Interior Latex Eggshell Enamel 223 1 

Benjamin Moore & Co. Moorcraft Super Hide Latex Eggshell Enamel C286 99 

Benjamin Moore & Co. MoorGard 103 Lustre Acrylic Fortified House Paint 100 

Best Paint Co., Inc. Microsol 2030 Eggshell Interior Latex 0 

Best Paint, Inc Duracryl Eggshell Interior/Exterior Acrylic Latex 50 

California Paints 

Fresh Coat Low Odor Low VOC Acrylic Latex Eggshell 

with Microban 0 

Frazee 

029 Envirokote Interior Low Odor - Low VOC Eggshell 

Finish 10 

Frazee Paints 

215 Royal Supreme: Exterior 100% Acrylic Low Lustre 

Finish 90 

Frazee Paints 22 Lo Glo: Interior Acrylic Eggshell Enamel 95 

ICI Paints Crown Coat Interior Latex Eggshell Enamel FOB804-XX 68 

ICI Paints 

Devoe Paint Wonder Speed Interior Latex Eggshell Latex 

Enamel DR526XX 44 

ICI Paints 

Devoe Paint Wonder-Hide Interior/Exterior Eggshell 

Enamel DR535XX 45 

ICI Paints 

Dulux Advanced Oil Interior/Exterior Eggshell Wall & 

Trim Enamel 1502 100 

ICI Paints Evermore Interior Latex Satin EM62XX 49 

ICI Paints Lifemaster 2000 Interior Eggshell 0 

ICI Paints Liquid Lustre Interior Latex Silk Enamel FOB 604-XX 100 

ICI Paints 

Mirrolac Speed Interior/Exterior Alkyd Eggshell Enamel 

DP72XX 75 

ICI Paints Ralph Lauren Interior Eggshell Exceptional Quality Acrylic 58 
DRAFT

ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings Compliant Product Lists 

Compliant Product List.doc 15 21-May-07 

NONFLAT (LOW GLOSS): 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Latex RL35XX 

ICI Paints 

Ralph Lauren Interior Eggshell Premium Quality Acrylic 

Latex Paint RL15XX 84 

ICI Paints 

Ralph Lauren Interior Satin Premium Quality Acrylic Latex 

RL12XX 84 

ICI Paints 

Speed-Wall Latex Eggshell Interior Wall & Trim Enamel 

1452-XXXX 84 

ICI Paints 

Ultra-Hide Build-Dur Spray Latex Eggshell Interior 

Primer/Finish 77 

ICI Paints Uniko Interior Latex Eggshell Enamel FOB 218-XX 83 

ICI Paints- Glidden America's Finest Interior Latex Satin 48 

ICI Paints- Glidden Evermore Interior Latex Eggshell 47 

Insl-x Coronado Paints Air Care Odorless Acrylic Eggshell 1230 Line 0 

Kelly Moore Paint Co., Inc. 1245 Acry-Shield 100% Acrylic Exterior Low Sheen Paint 100 

Kelly Moore Paint Co., Inc. 1510 Enviro-Cote Interior Acrylic Eggshell Enamel 15 

Kwal Paint EnviroKote Interior Eggshell Enamel 9 

MAB Paints Enviro-Pure Latex Eggshell Enamel 0 

Old Masters/Diamond Vogel Paints Health Kote Interior Latex Eggshell 0 

Old Masters/Diamond Vogel Paints Pro Plus Interior Latex Eggshell Enamel 89 

PPG Pure Performance Interior Eggshell Latex 0 

PPG Speedhide Interior Latex Enamel 73 

Rodda Paint Horizon Exterior Satin 96 

Rodda Paint Horizon Satin Interior Wall Paint 523501 0 

Rodda Paint Master Painter Interior Latex Satin Wall Paint 523101 93 

Sherwin Williams Duration Home Interior Latex Satin A97-100 Series 37 

Sherwin Williams Harmony Interior Latex Eg-shel 0 

Sico Chamois Interior Latex Paint 100% acrylic- Design Finish 0 

Southern Diversified Products LLC American Pride Paint Interior Eggshell Latex Paint 0 

Spectra Tone Eagle Odorless No VOC Solvent Free Eggshell Interior 0 

Spectra Tone 

Gold Label Spectra-Tough Interior Latex Low Luster 

Enamel 100 

Vista Paint Corporation 1200 Coverall Production Low Sheen 47 

Vista Paint Corporation 1700 Coverall Low Sheen 45 

Vista Paint Corporation 6200 Carefree Earth Coat Velva Sheen 8 

Vista Paint Corporation 6300 Carefree Earth Coat Eggshell 7 

Vista Paint Corporation 8200 Carefree Velva Sheen 47 

Vista Paint Corporation MB30 Aurora Bond II 47 

Yolo Colorhouse Yolo Colorhouse Satin Interior Wall Paint 0 

NONFLAT (MEDIUM GLOSS): 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Benjamin Moore & Co. Eco Spec Interior Latex Semi-Gloss Enamel 224 11 

Benjamin Moore & Co. Moorcraft Super Craft Latex Semi Gloss Enamel 252 62 

Benjamin Moore & Co. Moorcraft Super Hide Latex Semi-Gloss Enamel 96 

Benjamin Moore & Co. Moorcraft Super Spec 100% Acrylic Latex Low Lustre 48 
DRAFT

ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings Compliant Product Lists 

Compliant Product List.doc 16 21-May-07 

NONFLAT (MEDIUM GLOSS): 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

House Paint 

Best Paint Co, Inc. Duracryl Semigloss 400 Interior Exterior Acrylic Latex 50 

Best Paint Co, Inc. Microsol 2010 Satin Interior Latex 0 

Best Paint Co, Inc. Mircosol 2000 Gloss Interior Latex Enamel 0 

California Paint 

Fresh Coat Low odor Low VOC Acrylic Latex Semi-Gloss 

w/ Microban 35 

Dunn Edwards 

EcoShield Low Odor/ Zero VOC Interior Acrylic Semi 

Gloss Paint 8 

Dunn Edwards 

Sierra Low Odor "Zero VOC" Interior Acrylic Eggshell 

Paint W540 10 

Dunn Edwards 

Spartaglo Interior/Exterior Acrylic Semi Gloss Paint 

W7500 100 

Dunn Edwards 

Spartasheen Interior/Exterior Acrylic Low Sheen Paint W 

7300 95 

Dunn Edwards Spartashell W7400 90 

Earthpaint Inc. Clear Skies Wall Paint 42 

Frazee 024 Speedsheen Semi Gloss Interior Vinyl Acrylic Finish 49 

Frazee 032 Envirokote Semi Gloss Enamel 10 

Frazee 

128 Satin Glide II: Interior/Exterior Acrylic Semi Gloss 

Finish 49 

ICI Paint 

Devoe Paint Wonder-Hide Interior/Exterior Semi Gloss 

Enamel DR537XX 48 

ICI Paints 

Crown Coat Interior-Exterior Semi Gloss Enamel FOB 

805-XX 74 

ICI Paints Devoe Wonder Speed Semi Gloss Interior Latex Enamel 49 

ICI Paints 

Dulux Advanced Oil Interior/Exterior Semi Gloss Wall & 

Trim Enamel 1506 100 

ICI Paints Interior Latex Semi Gloss Enamel FOB 215-XX 89 

ICI Paints Lifemaster 2000 Interior Semi-Gloss 0 

ICI Paints 

Mirrolac Speed Interior/Exterior Alkyd Semi Gloss Enamel 

DP73XX 87 

ICI Paints 

Ultra-Hide Durus Exterior Acrylic Semi Gloss Finish 2416-

XXXX 79 

ICI Paints 

Wonder - Pure No VOC/Odor Interior Semigloss Wall & 

Trim Paint 0 

ICI Paints- Glidden America's Finest Interior Latex Semi Gloss 48 

ICI Paints- Glidden Evermore Exterior Satin 45 

Kelly Moore Paint Co., Inc. 1520 Enviro-Cote Interior Acrylic Semi Gloss Enamel 13 

MAB Paints Enviro-Pure Latex Semi Gloss 0 

Niagara Protective Coatings (NPC) W.B. Enamel 100 

Old Masters/Diamond Vogel Paints Health Kote Interior Latex Semi-Gloss 0 

Old Masters/Diamond Vogel Paints Pro Plus Interior Latex Gloss Enamel 60 

PPG Pure Performance Interior Semi Gloss 0 

Rodda Paint Horizon Low Gloss Interior Paint 533501 0 

Rodda Paint Horizon Semi Gloss Interior Wall Paint 543501 0 

Sherwin Williams Harmony Interior Latex Semi Gloss B 10 Series 0 

Sico Shantung Interior Latex Paint 100% Acrylic- Design Finish 0 

Southern Diversified Products LLC American Pride Paint 0 

Southern Diversified Products LLC American Pride Paint Interior 100% Acrylic Semi-Gloss 0 
DRAFT

ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings Compliant Product Lists 

Compliant Product List.doc 17 21-May-07 

NONFLAT (MEDIUM GLOSS): 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Enamel 

Spectra Tone Eagle Odorless No VOC 0 

Spectra Tone Gold Label Premium Enviro III 10 

Vista Paint Corporation 1300 Coverall Production Semi Gloss 47 

Vista Paint Corporation 6400 Carefree Earth Coat Semi-Gloss 8 

Vista Paint Corporation 7500 Acriglo Eggshell White 39 

Vista Paint Corporation 8400 Carefree Semi Gloss 44 

Yolo Colorhouse Yolo Colorhouse Semi-Gloss Interior Wall Paint 533676 0 

PRIMER, SEALER, UNDERCOATER: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

3M Company Scotch Clad Concrete Primer 2271 50 

3M Company Scotch Clad CP100 Concrete and Interlaminar Primer 60 

Ace Hardware Corporation Clear Latex Masonry Sealer 73 

Ace Hardware Corporation Pro Line Latex Block Filler & Sealer 95 

Benjamin Moore & Co. Eco Spec Interior Latex Primer Sealer 0 

Benjamin Moore & Co. Latex Block Filler 17 

Benjamin Moore & Co. Moorcraft Super Craft Interior Latex Primer 63 

Benjamin Moore & Co. Moorcraft Super Craft Latex Block Filler* 53 

Benjamin Moore & Co. Moorcraft Super Hide Latex Primer/Undercoater 67 

Benjamin Moore & Co. 

Moorcraft Super Spec Latex Enamel Undercoater & Primer 

Sealer 75 

Benjamin Moore & Co. Moorcraft Super Spec Latex Exterior Primer 96 

Benjamin Moore & Co. Pro Saver Plus Latex Primer 59 

Benjamin Moore & Co. Regal First Coat 216 Interior Latex Primer & Underbody 91 

Cal Western Paints, Inc. Acrylic Metal Primer-Universal 56 

Cal Western Paints, Inc. Acrylic Primer Sealer Undercoater 47 

Cal Western Paints, Inc. Hard Seal 3101 97 

Cal Western Paints, Inc. HPV Drywall Primer Sealer 1018 54 

Cal Western Paints, Inc. Safe Seal Interior 3104 65 

Cloverdale Paint Premium Classic Latex Block Filler* 49 

Columbia Paint & Coatings 

Hi-Performance Interior/Exterior Acrylic Latex Block Filler 

05-055* 47 

Conklin Company, Inc. Prime Time- Primer Coat for Acrylic Elastomeric Coating 36 

Conklin Company, Inc. Show Kote Exterior Paint Primer 13 

Conklin Company, Inc. Tack Coat- Emulsion Primer for Elastomeric Coating 39 

Davlin Coatings, Inc. Butylseal 572 7 

Degussa Building Systems Blockfiller 749 84 

Degussa Building Systems Primer 1000 54 

Degussa Building Systems Primer 150 25 

Degussa Building Systems Thoroc IC2000 0 

Dunn-Edwards Flex-Prime Flexible Crack-Resistant Primer W6315 73 

Dunn-Edwards High Hide PVA Sealer 60 

Dunn-Edwards Interior Latex Enamel Undercoater W2400 77 

Dunn-Edwards Latex Wall Sealer W 2397 59 
DRAFT

ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings Compliant Product Lists 

Compliant Product List.doc 18 21-May-07 

PRIMER, SEALER, UNDERCOATER: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Dunn-Edwards Special Masonry Primer 78 

Dunn-Edwards Ultra-Grip Acrylic Multi-Purpose Primer W 715 42 

Dunn-Edwards Vinylastic Interior Pigmented Sealer 60 

Duron Bond –n- Seal Exterior Acrylic Latex Primer* 90 

Duron Dura Crete Waterborne Acrylic Masonry Primer White* 45 

Edoco Burkepoxy Primer 0 

Everest Coatings Inc. Evercoat 100 General Purpose Primer 41 

EVR-Gard Coatings Bond-Aid Pigmented Surface Conditioner 92 

EVR-Gard Coatings Busan Vinyl Acrylic Wood and Metal Primer 76 

EVR-Gard Coatings 

Enamel Undercoater Premium 100% Acrylic Enamel 

Undercoater 76 

EVR-Gard Coatings Evrcare Primer Sealer 0 

EVR-Gard Coatings Evr-Seal PVA Sealer 55 

EVR-Gard Coatings Quick Dry Latex Enamel Undercoat 61 

EVR-Gard Coatings Spray & Fill Block Filler 51 

Frazee Industries Acrylic Block Filler Interior/Exterior Block Filler* 80 

Frazee Industries Acry-Prime Interior/Exterior Acrylic Undercoater 88 

Frazee Industries Aqua Seal Interior Wall Sealer & Enamel Undercoat 99 

Frazee Industries Epotilt Exterior Epxoy Acrylic Concrete Sealer* 54 

Frazee Industries Grip-N-Seal Interior/Exterior Acrylic All Purpose Primer 95 

Frazee Industries High-Build Semi-Gloss Primer, Fill and Finish 96 

Frazee Industries Hi-Hide PVA Sealer 100 

Frazee Industries Hi-Hide PVA Sealer: Interior Wall Sealer 98 

Frazee Industries P K Primer 80 

Frazee Industries Prep Step Interior Drywall Basecoat 90 

Frazee Industries 

Prime+Plus Interior/Exterior Acrylic Primer/Sealer/Stain 

Killer* 74 

Frazee Industries Quick Prep Interior Drywall Basecoat 90 

Frazee Industries Rollercoat Base Coat 12 

Frazee Industries Shutter Undercoater 65 

Frazee Industries Special Tiltup Primer: Acrylic Concrete Sealer 53 

Frazee Industries Water Reducible Black Fill Coat 92 

Frazee Industries 

X-Terminator 2 Interior & Exterior Acrylic All-Purpose 

Primer 97 

Gaco Western, Inc. Gacoflex E-5481 0 

Gaco Western, Inc. Gacoflex U-5677 Polyurethane Sealer 97 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) All-Purpose Stain Killer/Primer/Sealer 100 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Bloktex Heavy Duty Interior/Exterior Acrylic Block Filler 64 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) 

Bloxfil 4000 Interior/Exterior Heavy Duty Acrylic Block 

Filler* 64 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Hydrosealer-WB Waterborne Pigmented Bonding Coat 100 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) 

Prep & Prime Bond-Prep Interior/Exterior Water-Based 

Pigmented Masonry Bonding Primer Sealer 100 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) 

Prep & Prime Fill & Seal Equalizing Interior Water-Based 

Primer Sealer 75 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) 

Prep & Prime Gripper Blocksurfacer Interior/Exterior 

Water-Based Primer Sealer 82 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) 

Prep & Prime Gripper Multi-Purpose Interior/Exterior 

Water-Based Primer Sealer 100 
DRAFT

ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings Compliant Product Lists 

Compliant Product List.doc 19 21-May-07 

PRIMER, SEALER, UNDERCOATER: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) 

Prep & Prime High Build Fill & Seal Water Based Wall 

Sealer 69 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) 

Prep & Prime House 100% Acrylic Water-Based Primer 

Sealer 100 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Prep & Prime Odorless Interior Water Based Primer Sealer 3 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Prep & Prime PVA Wall Interior Water Based Primer 100 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) 

Prep & Prime Vapor Barrier Interior Water-Based Primer 

Sealer 93 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Primer Interior Latex Primer Sealer 100 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Primz 220 Interior Latex Drywall Sealer 75 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Primz 220 Interior Latex PVA Wall Primer 100 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Primz 220 Interor/Exterior Latex Block Filler 61 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) 

Primz 220 Kilstain WB Interior/Exterior Latex All Purpose 

Stain Killer/Primer/Sealer 100 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Primz 220 Latex New Drywall Primer 73 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Production Interior PVA Drywall Sealer 100 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Promaster Contractor Finish Latex PVA Primer-Sealer 100 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Pro-Tech Interior Latex Wall Primer 100 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) PVA Sealer Interior Pigmented Primer 36 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) 

Ralph Lauren Paint Interior Deeptone Primer Sealer 

Premium Quality Acrylic Latex 84 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Speed Wall Interior Latex Primer Sealer 73 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) 

Speed-Wall Interior PVA Latex Primer General Purpose 

Primer 73 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Ultra-Hide Interior/Exterior Latex Block Filler 61 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Ultra-Hide Interior/Exterior Latex Block Filler 61 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Wonder-Pure No VOC/Odor Interior Wall Primer 3 

Hamilton Coatings Pro PVA 63 

Hamilton Coatings PVA Sealer 45 

Hirshfield's Paint Manufacturing Primemaster Primer/Sealer 40 

Insl-x Products Corporation Corobond High Performance Acrylic Block Filler- White 44 

International Coatings ICO Primer 0 

Jones-Blair Co. Acrylic Latex Block Filler 59 

Kelly-Moore Paint Co., Inc. Acry-Plex Interior PVA Primer/Sealer Low Odor Formula 25 

Kelly-Moore Paint Co., Inc. Wall Prep Interior Latex Wallboard Surfacer 59 

Kwal Paint #5940 Accu-Guard 100% Acrylic Block Filler* 61 

Kwal Paint #5862 Cancel Embassy WB 100% Acrylic Primer* 54 

MAB Paints, Incorporated Block Kote #1000* 100 

Miller Paint Company 6015 Exterior Block Filler* 77 

Multicolor Specialties, Inc. Speckle Effects Basecoat 93 

Pacific Polymers International Elasto-Poxy Primer (WB) 0 

ParexLahabra, Inc. Primer 310, Lahabra Primer 35 

PPG Industries, Inc. Block Resistant Primer 95 

PPG Industries, Inc. 67881 77 

PPG Industries, Inc. Perma Crete Texture Coarse 54 

PPG Industries, Inc. 

Perma-Crete Low Temperature Cure Concrete 

Block/Masonry Surfacer 60 

PPG Industries, Inc. Pure Performance Primer Interior Latex Primer 0 

PPG Industries, Inc. SpeedCraft Interior Latex Primer 77 
DRAFT

ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings Compliant Product Lists 

Compliant Product List.doc 20 21-May-07 

PRIMER, SEALER, UNDERCOATER: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

PPG Industries, Inc. 

Speedhide Exterior House and Trim Wood Primer, Sealer, 

Undercoater 89 

PPG Industries, Inc. Speedhide Exterior Latex Masonry Surface Sealer 61 

PPG Industries, Inc. Speedhide High Build Interior Latex Primer/Sealer 90 

PPG Industries, Inc. Speedhide Interior/Exterior Masonry Block Filler 20 

PPG Industries, Inc. 

Sunproof Exterior House and Trim Primer, Sealer, 

Undercoater Latex Primer 81 

Rodda Paint Company SR Ultra Prime 72 

Rodda Paint Company Interior/Exterior Latex Block Filler 33517* 83 

Roman Decorating Products All Pro Sup-R-Prep 670 21 

Roman Decorating Products All Pro Ultra-Prep 685 14 

Roman Decorating Products Bite Clear Wall Size GH-09 95 

Roman Decorating Products Golden Harvest EZ-Hang Primer GH-97 14 

Roman Decorating Products Golden Harvest White Bite 14 

Roman Decorating Products Professional R-35, Heavy Duty Latex Primer Pro-935 21 

Roman Decorating Products Roman Professional Ultraprime Pro-977 14 

Roman Decorating Products Vinyl Prep Pro-909 95 

Scotch Paint Corp Garage Door Primer G.D.P. 59 

Scotch Paint Corp Latex Primer Undercoat Int/Ext 81 

Scott Paint #402 Ultra 100% Acrylic Latex Block Filler* 75 

Sherwin-Williams Co. A-100 Exterior Latex Wood Primer* 87 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Conco Interior Acrylic Vapor Barrier Primer/Finish 60 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Conco Interior Water Base Drywall PVA Primer/Sealer 98 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Dimensions Designer Colors Primer, Deep Color Undercoat 81 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Do It Best Interior Latex Wall & Wood Primer 91 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Dutch Boy Clarity Interior Latex Primer 5 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Dutch Boy House & Trim Primer - Latex Exterior, White 91 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Exterior Epoxy Masonry Tilt Primer, White 94 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Harmony Interior Primer 5 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Healthspec Low Odor Interior Latex Primer 6 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Heavy Duty Block Filler 62 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Interior Latex Primer* 88 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Loxon Block Surfacer* 82 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Loxon Masonry Coatings System Exterior Acrylic Primer 97 

Sherwin-Williams Co. PrepRite 200 Interior Latex Primer 78 

Sherwin-Williams Co. PrepRite 400 Interior Latex Wall Primer 63 

Sherwin-Williams Co. 

PrepRite Bonding Primer Interior/Exterior Adhesion 

Promoting Primer 97 

Sherwin-Williams Co. PrepRite Bonding Primer 42 

Sherwin-Williams Co. PrepRite Classic Interior Latex Primer 91 

Sherwin-Williams Co. PrepRite High Build Interior Latex Primer/Surfacer 75 

Sherwin-Williams Co. PrepRite Interior Acrylic Masonry Primer 90 

Sherwin-Williams Co. PrepRite Interior/Exterior Block Filler 44 

Sherwin-Williams Co. PrepRite ProBlock Interior/Exterior Latex Primer/Sealer* 73 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Pro-Cryl Universal Acrylic Primer 89 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Pro-Hide Silver Heavy Duty Latex Block Filler 62 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Pro-Hide Gold Exterior Latex Primer 87 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Proline Premium Exterior Latex Wood Primer 91 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Proline Premium Interior Latex Wall Primer 63 
DRAFT

ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings Compliant Product Lists 

Compliant Product List.doc 21 21-May-07 

PRIMER, SEALER, UNDERCOATER: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Promar High Holdout Interior Latex Primer 83 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Sears Best Weatherbeater Exterior Latex Primer 91 

Sherwin-Williams Co. 

Southwest Builders Hydro-Lac Quick Dry Latex 

Undercoater 96 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Southwest Builders Summit Exterior Acrylic Primer 41 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Suprime '4' Interior Latex Wall Primer 87 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Suprime Interior Latex Enamel Undercoater 91 

Sherwin-Williams Co. T.P.S. Exterior Latex Primer 87 

Sherwin-Williams Co. T.P.S. Interior Latex Wall Primer 88 

Sherwin-Williams Co. T.P.S. Interior/Exterior Acrylic Latex Bonding Primer 42 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Wasatch Hi Hide Interior Latex Primer 58 

Sierra Corp. Elasta Block 78 

Sierra Corp. Latex Primer/Undercoater 77 

Southern Diversified Products, LLC American Pride Interior Latex Primer 0 

Specialty Construction Brands, Inc. Masonry Sealer and Primer 12 

Spectra-Tone Paint Corp. Gold Label PVA Latex Primer Sealer 83 

Spectra-Tone Paint Corp. Jobmaster "The Uniformer" Drywall Latex Primer 84 

Spectra-Tone Paint Corp. Latex Block Fill* 73 

Spectra-Tone Paint Corp. Masonry Primer 82 

Spectra-Tone Paint Corp. No VOC Primer 8 

SPM Thermoshield Inc. Thermoshield Acrylic Flex-Tac 50 

Tamms Tamms Masonry Primer* <10 

Textured Coatings of America Latex 1098Type Block Filler 73 

Textured Coatings of America Super Cote Classic Primer 76 

Tnemec Company Inc. CT Densifyer 0 

Tnemec Company Inc. Epoxoprime LV 18 

Tnemec Company Inc. Sub-Flex EP 8 

True Value Manufacturing Interior Latex Primer PVA 95 

United Coatings Manufacturing Co. Unibase 58 

United States Gypsum Company Decorative Interior Finish Sealer 0 

United States Gypsum Company Sheetrock Primer 2 

United States Gypsum Company Smoke Stop Acoustical Sealant 65 

United States Gypsum Company USG Sheetrock Brand Tuff Hide 25 

United States Gypsum Company USG Sheetrock Brand Wall Covering Primer 60 

United States Gypsum Company Wallcovering Primer 2 

Valspar Corporation 1st Step Interior Latex Primer 33 

Valspar Corporation 1st Step New Construction Primer 91 

Valspar Corporation American Tradition High Hide Primer 96 

Valspar Corporation American Tradition Skidnot Primer 83 

Valspar Corporation Colorplace Exterior Latex Primer 95 

Valspar Corporation Colorplace Interior Latex Primer 33 

Valspar Corporation Guardian Prof. Quality Exterior Latex Primer 95 

Valspar Corporation Guardian Prof. Quality Interior Latex Primer 33 

Valspar Corporation Guardian Prof. Quality New Construction Primer 91 

Valspar Corporation Latex Interior Wall Primer 33 

Valspar Corporation PR-14 WB Quik Prime 80 

Valspar Corporation PR-7 Flex Prime 18 

Valspar Corporation Prep Step Latex Stain Killer 75 

Valspar Corporation Prep Step Wallboard Primer 33 
DRAFT

ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings Compliant Product Lists 

Compliant Product List.doc 22 21-May-07 

PRIMER, SEALER, UNDERCOATER: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Valspar Corporation Prof. Quality Interior Latex Primer 33 

Valspar Corporation Quik Hide Interior Latex Primer 33 

Valspar Corporation Skid Resistant Primer 83 

Vista Paint Corporation 100% Acrylic Block Filler 73 

Vista Paint Corporation Acrylic Primer 78 

Vista Paint Corporation Block Kote* 71 

Vista Paint Corporation Carefree Earth Coat Primer 12 

Vista Paint Corporation Seal Kote 66 

Vista Paint Corporation Terminator II 48 

Vista Paint Corporation Uniprep 24 

Vista Paint Corporation Uniprime* 48 

W.R. Grace & Co. - Conn. Perma-A-Barrier WB Primer 9 

Yenkin-Majestic Paint Corporation Long Life Latex Drywall Primer 56 

Zinsser Co., Inc. Guardz High Performance Sealer 95 

Zinsser Co., Inc. Shieldz Universal Pre-Wallcovering Primer 73 

Zinsser Co., Inc. Z-54 Heavy Duty Wallcovering Primer with Tack 73 

Zinsser Co., Inc. Z-Prime II 5 

ROOF: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 50 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Behr Process Corporation Roof Paint, White Reflective 48 

Benjamin Moore & Co. Moorcraft Roof Spec Flat Finish 140 44 

Cal Western Paints, Inc. Dynoflex Roof Patch Sealant 47 

Cal Western Paints, Inc. Dynoseal Roof Primer 37 

Conklin Company, Inc. Rapid Roof HV Top Coat- Acrylic Elastomeric Coating 34 

Davlin Coatings, Inc. Acrylastic 510 6 

Dow Corning Corporation Allguard Roof Coating - Pastel Tint Base 23 

Elastomeric Roofing Systems, Inc Erlastibase 19 

Everest Coatings Inc. Evercoat 500/510 Elastomeric 100% Acrylic Roof Coating 26 

Everest Coatings Inc. Evercoat 700 Bleed Resistant 100% Acrylic Roof Coating 42 

EVR-Gard Coatings Texdura 25 

Gaco Western, Inc. A30 41 

Gaco Western, Inc. A3611 41 

Gaco Western, Inc. UB8380 0 

Gardner-Gibson BlackJack Elastomeric Roof Coating 41 

Gardner-Gibson Sta Kool Elastomeric Roof Coating 41 

Gardner-Gibson APOC Elastomeric Coating 40 

Gardner-Gibson APOC White Elastomeric Roof Patch 12 

Gardner-Gibson Solar Guard White Premium Elastomeric 41 

Gardner-Gibson Solar Guard Brushable White Elastomeric 12 

Garland Company Pyramic 0 

Henry Company Water Based Latex Low VOC, RTC 583 2 

Henry Company Water Based Latex, White Elastomeric Coating 44 

Insulating Coatings Corporation ASTEC 4000 Surface Conditioner 0 

Jones-Blair Co. Elastacryl FR Roof Coating White 27 
DRAFT

ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings Compliant Product Lists 

Compliant Product List.doc 23 21-May-07 

ROOF: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 50 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Jones-Blair Co. Elastacryl FR,QS White 40 

Jones-Blair Co. Elastacryl Roof Coating White 27 

LaPolla Industries, Inc. Therm-O-Flex Original (TF 750) 34 

Life Paint Company Stretch-Guard Roof Coating 47 

Pacific Polymers International Elasto-Tex Roof-Coat 23 

Rust-Oleum Corp. Roof Coating 4 

Sherwin-Williams Co. KST Coatings 17421 24 

Sherwin-Williams Co. KST Coatings White Elastomeric Roof Coating 45 

Southwestern Petroleum 

Corporation SWEPCO White Acrylic Coating 0 

Tremco Incorporated High Build Reflective Coating 34 

Tremco Incorporated Polyurea Roofing Coating System 10 

Tropical Asphalt, LLC Tropical Asphalt Eternalastic White Elastomeric Coating 

A/F 26 

United Coatings Manufacturing Co. Acron 60 8 

United Coatings Manufacturing Co. Diathon Pearl White 10 

United Coatings Manufacturing Co. Roof Mate White 5 

United Coatings Manufacturing Co. Sunshield 9 

RUST PREVENTATIVE: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 250 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Acrymax Technologies PC-125 48 

Aervoe Industries, Inc Rustproof WaterBased Paint 219 

Benjamin Moore & Co. M28 DTM Acrylic Gloss Enamel 206 

Benjamin Moore & Co. M29 DTM Acrylic Semi-Gloss Enamel 207 

Cloverdale Ecologic DTM 198 

Cloverdale Ecologic Rustex Primer 103 

Everest Coatings Primer 110 105 

Frazee 540 DTM Industrial Maintenance Gloss 150 

Frazee 561 Acrylic Metal Primer 145 

Lapolla Coatings RCS-30 DTM Acrylic Primer 150 

Life Paint Company 100% Acrylic Gloss DTM 197 

MAB Paints Hydro Primer Acrylic DTM Maintenance Primer 100 

MAB Paints Rust-O-Lastic Gloss Acrylic DTM Maintenance Finish 220 

MAB Paints 

Rust-O-Lastic Low Sheen Acrylic DTM Maintenance 

Finish 220 

Pittsburg Paints 97-145 Pitt Guard Direct To Rust Epoxy Mastic Coating 128 

PPG Industries, Inc. 97-145 Pitt Guard DTR 128 

Rustoleum 7900 American Accents 133 

Rust-Oleum Corp. 5200 DTM Acrylic 222 

Rust-Oleum Corp. 5200 DTM Acrylic Primer 242 

Sherwin-Williams Co. DTM Acrylic Gloss Coating (Waterborne) 150 

Sherwin-Williams Co. DTM Acrylic Primer Finish 150 

Spectra Tone 81 Latex Metal Primer 94 

Spectra-Tone Paint Corp. DTM Gloss Acrylic 129 

Vista 4800 Metal Pro Primer 96 
DRAFT

ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings Compliant Product Lists 

Compliant Product List.doc 24 21-May-07 

SPECIALTY PRIMER, SEALER, UNDERCOATER: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

American Formulating and 

Manufacturing SafeCoat Transitional Primer 9 

American Paints 

Terminator 2 Water-Based Stain Killer Interior Exterior 

Primer/Sealer* 45 

Benjamin Moore & Co. Moorcraft Super Spec Busan 100% Acrylic Exterior Prime* 54 

Benjamin Moore & Co. BM Fresh Start All-Purpose 100% Acrylic Primer 66 

Best Paint Company Best Universal Primer 89 

Cal Western Paints, Inc. Stain Stopper & Transitional Primer 10 

Finnaren & Haley Inc. Weather Barrier 1850 Masonry Conditioner/Bonding Sealer 0 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) 

Glidden Prime Interiors 100% Acrylic Latex Multi-Purpose 

Stainkiller Primer/Sealer 40 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Prep & Prime Stain Jammer Interior Water Based Primer 40 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Ultra-Hide Aquacrylic Gripper Stain Killer Primer-Sealer 100 

Life Paint Company Acrylic Stain Blocking Busan Primer 90 

Miller Paint Company 6060 All Purpose Stain Blocking Primer* 61 

PPG Industries, Inc. 

Seal Grip Interior/Exterior 100% Acrylic Universal 

Primer/Sealer 96 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Do It Best Interior Latex Stain Block Primer 97 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Dura-Kote 100% Acrylic Interior/Exterior Primer 42 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Interior Latex Stain Blocking Primer 91 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Interior/Exterior Latex Primer StainBlocker 97 

Specialty Construction Brands, Inc. Foster Waterbase Primer 56 

United Coatings Manufacturing Co. Acrylex 400 66 

Valspar Corporation 1st Step Latex Stain Block 75 

Valspar Corporation Prep Step Latex Stain Killer 75 

TRAFFIC MARKING: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Ace Hardware Corporation Industrial Maintenance Latex Zone Marking Paint 99 

Aexcel Corporation Fast Dry Waterborne Traffic Marking Paint 97 

Aexcel Corporation Jet Dry Waterborne Traffic Marking Paint 80 

Aexcel Corporation Methyl Methacrylate Traffic Marking Paint 9 

Aexcel Corporation Regular Dry Waterborne Traffic Marking Paint 92 

Aexcel Corporation Waterborne Traffic Marking Paint 84 

Dunn-Edwards Vin-L-Stripe 57 

Ennis Paint Inc. Waterborne Traffic and Parking Paint 96 

EVR-Gard Coatings Traffic Paint White 100% Acrylic Resin 87 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Traffic Paint Water Reducible Acrylic 100 

Jones-Blair Co. Latex Zone Marking Yellow 97 

Kelly-Moore Paint Co., Inc. Mark Right Latex Marking Paint 37 

Life Paint Company Traffic Marking Paint 64 

Pervo Paint Company Traffic Paint, Hi-Performance WB, Rapid Dry 72 

Pervo Paint Company PervoPlastic 6050 Series 96 
DRAFT

ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings Compliant Product Lists 

Compliant Product List.doc 25 21-May-07 

TRAFFIC MARKING: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Pervo Paint Company PervoStripe 6000 Series 72 

Pride Paint Company Latex Traffic Paint 90 

Rust-Oleum Corp. Traffic Striping Paint 2500 Series 89 

Rust-Oleum Corp. Traffic Zone Striping Paint 2300 Series 74 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Interior/Exterior Flat Acrylic Water Base Traffic Marking 

Paint, White 83 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Pro-Hide Silver Quick Dry Waterborne Traffic Paint, White 91 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Setfast Acrylic Latex Traffic Marking Paint, White 97 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Setfast Low VOC Acrylic Traffic Marking Paint, White 90 

Simpson Coatings Group, Inc. Jet Dry Lead Free Traffic Marking Paint 72 

Spectra-Tone Paint Corp. Acrylic Traffic Paint 89 

ThorWorks Industries, Inc. SealMaster Fast Dry HD 87 

ThorWorks Industries, Inc. SealMaster Line Block Out 69 

ThorWorks Industries, Inc. SportMaster Line Paint 69 

TMT Pathway Water Based Traffic Coating 96 

Vista Paint Corporation On-Line Semi-Gloss Traffic Marking Paint 45 

Vista Paint Corporation On-Line Fast Dry Traffic Marking Paint 90 

WATERPROOFING MEMBRANE: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 250 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

American Polymers Corporation 

DBA Polycoat Products Polycoat - Aquaseal 5000 194 

Epro Services, Inc. Ecobase II Waterproofing Membrane 10 

Epro Services, Inc. Ecobase Waterproofing Membrane 9 

Epro Services, Inc. Ecoline R Liquid Applied Membrane 14 

Epro Services, Inc. Ecoline S Spray Applied Membrane 8 

Jones-Blair Co. Neogard Perma-Gard III 124 

Pacific Polymers International Elasto-Deck BT 184 

TEC Specialty Construction Brands, 

Inc. HydraFlex Waterproofing Crack Isolation Membrane 13 

Tremco Incorporated Tremproof 150 and Thermastic 150 44 

Tremco Incorporated Tremproof 201L 185 

Tremco Incorporated Tremproof 201T 156 

Tremco Incorporated Tremproof 250 GC SL 123 

Tremco Incorporated Tremproof 60R 192 

Tremco Incorporated Tremproof 60V 101 

Tremco Incorporated Vulkem 250 GC-R 144 

W.R. Grace & Co. - Conn. Bituthene Deck Prep Surface Treatment 10 

W.R. Grace & Co. - Conn. Procor Fluid Applied Waterproofing Membrane 75 
DRAFT

ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings Compliant Product Lists 

Compliant Product List.doc 26 21-May-07 

WOOD COATINGS - CLEAR: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 275 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Akzo Nobel Coatings Synteko Sealmaster 248 

Basic Coatings, Inc. Hydroline Wood Floor Sealer 181 

Behr Process Corporation Premium Weatherproofing Wood Finish 247 

BonaKemi USA, Inc. Bona BonaSeal 91 

BonaKemi USA, Inc. Bona Eon 70 109 

BonaKemi USA, Inc. Bona Mega 196 

BonaKemi USA, Inc. Bona Traffic 228 

Cal Western Paints, Inc. Acrylicad Clear Wood Finish 251 

Cal Western Paints, Inc. Acryvar Clear Acrylic 275 

Cal Western Paints, Inc. Naturals Clear Wood Finish 201 

Frazee Industries Clear Waterborne 66 

Frazee Industries Interior Water Reducible Clear Sealer 243 

Frazee Industries Waterborne Clear Satin Lacquer 253 

Frazee Industries Waterborne Clear Semigloss Lacquer 245 

Frazee Industries Waterborne Flat Lacquer Clear 241 

Frazee Industries Waterborne Gloss Lacquer 250 

Frazee Industries Waterborne High Solids Clear Gloss Lacquer 250 

Frazee Industries Waterborne Skateboard Clear 207 

Gemini Coatings, Inc. High Solids Waterborne 231 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Penchrome Interior Waterborne Aquaacrylic 196 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Penchrome Interior Waterborne Satin Clear 177 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Wood Pride Waterborne Gloss Varnish Clear 196 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Wood Pride Waterborne Varnish Satin Clear 177 

Hillyard Industries, Inc. Courtguard 219 

Hillyard Industries, Inc. Tip Off 203 

Hirshfield's Paint Manufacturing Ultra Clear/Clear Coat 135 

Kelly-Moore Paint Co., Inc. Kel Aqua Sanding Sealer 231 

Kelly-Moore Paint Co., Inc. Kel-Aqua Clear Wood Finish 179 

Kelly-Moore Paint Co., Inc. Kel-Thane II Waterborne Interior Clear Finish 168 

Life Paint Company Polyurethane 171 

Multicolor Specialties, Inc. Multipurpose Clear Topcoat 230 

Perma-Chink Systems, Inc. Acrylic Gloss 221 

Perma-Chink Systems, Inc. Acrylic Satin 218 

Perma-Chink Systems, Inc. Lifeline Advance 248 

Perma-Chink Systems, Inc. Lifeline XL 234 

Perma-Chink Systems, Inc. SureShine 251 

Pioneer Eclipse Corporation Woodstar Wood Floor Finish 269 

PPG Industries, Inc. Gloss Waterborne Polyurethane 235 

PPG Industries, Inc. Olympic Water Based Sanding Sealer 234 

PPG Industries, Inc. Waterborne Polyurethane 235 

PPG Industries, Inc. WaterGuard Wood Sealant – Water Base 168 

R.J. McGlennon Co. Inc. Aqualac Waterborne Precatalyzed Clear Topcoats 263 

Rudd Company Hycril Waterbase Lacquer 232 

Rudd Company PPI Self Seal-Waterbase 264 

Rust-Oleum Corp. Floor Finish 254 

Rust-Oleum Corp. Interior Urethane Waterborne 192 

Rust-Oleum Corp. Outdoor Spar Urethane 235 

Samuel Cabot Inc. Cabothane 166 

Samuel Cabot Inc. Timberjack Gloss 253 
DRAFT

ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings Compliant Product Lists 

Compliant Product List.doc 27 21-May-07 

WOOD COATINGS - CLEAR: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 275 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Acrylic Latex Varnish, Dull 167 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Acrylic Latex Varnish, Gloss 175 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Dimensions Décor Clear Gloss 175 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Minwax Polycrylic 1G Satin 264 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Minwax Water-Based Polyurethane For Floors, Semi-Gloss 242 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Thompson’s Water Seal Advanced Natural Wood Protector 243 

Sherwin-Williams Co. 

Thompson’s Water Seal Waterproofer Plus Clear Wood 

Protector 265 

Simpson Coatings Group, Inc. ESL Sanding Sealer 229 

Simpson Coatings Group, Inc. Gloss ESL Lacquer 230 

Simpson Coatings Group, Inc. Satin ESL Lacquer 232 

Simpson Coatings Group, Inc. Semi-Gloss ESL Lacquer 225 

Spectra-Tone Paint Corp. Acrylic Clear 177 

Spectra-Tone Paint Corp. Spectra Lac Clear 253 

Spectra-Tone Paint Corp. Spectra Lac Sanding Sealer 272 

Trinity Coatings Co. 275 VOC Hi Build Gloss Lacquer 272 

Trinity Coatings Co. 275 VOC Hi Build Satin Topcoat 267 

Trinity Coatings Co. 275 VOC Hi Build Sealer 272 

Trinity Coatings Co. 275 VOC Vinyl Sealer 273 

Trinity Coatings Co. 275 VOC Water White Clear Gloss 272 

Trinity Coatings Co. 275 VOC Water White Sealer 272 

Trinity Coatings Co. Aqualac Clear Gloss Lacquer 252 

Trinity Coatings Co. Aqualac Clear Sanding Sealer 271 

Trinity Coatings Co. Aqualac Lacquer Sanding Sealer 230 

Trinity Coatings Co. Clear Gloss Waterborne Lacquer 270 

Trinity Coatings Co. Clear Waterborne Acrylic Urethane 244 

Trinity Coatings Co. Waterborne Clear Lacquer 201 

Trinity Coatings Co. Waterborne Clear Sanding Sealer 195 

Trinity Coatings Co. Waterborne Gloss Lacquer 246 

Valspar Corporation Decorative Effects Clear Protector Gloss 245 

Valspar Corporation Decorative Effects Clear Protector Satin 240 

Valspar Corporation Enviro + Plus Water Based Clear Topcoat, 60 Sheen 273 

Valspar Corporation McCloskey Clear Coat Latex Gloss 245 

Valspar Corporation McCloskey Clear Coat Latex Satin 240 

Valspar Corporation McCloskey Heirloom Crystal Clear Poly Gloss 258 

Valspar Corporation McCloskey Heirloom Crystal Clear Poly Satin 257 

Valspar Corporation McCloskey Waterbase Poly Gloss 247 

Valspar Corporation McCloskey Waterbase Poly Satin 248 

Valspar Corporation McCloskey Waterbase Poly Semi Gloss 246 

Valspar Corporation Valspar Waterbase Poly Gloss 247 

Valspar Corporation Valspar Waterbase Poly Satin 248 

Vanex, Inc. Break-Through Gloss Clear 249 

Vanex, Inc. Break-Through Satin Clear 246 

Vanex, Inc. Clear Advantage Gloss 222 

Vanex, Inc. Clear Advantage Sanding Sealer 203 

Vanex, Inc. Clear Advantage Satin 231 

Vista Paint Corporation W/B High Gloss Wood Lacquer 226 

Zinsser Co., Inc. Pro Finisher Waterborne Sanding Sealer 273 

Zinsser Co., Inc. Pro Finisher WB Polyurethane 214 
DRAFT

ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings Compliant Product Lists 

Compliant Product List.doc 28 21-May-07 

WOOD COATINGS - CLEAR: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 275 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Zinsser Co., Inc. Wolman RainCoat Clear Water Repellent Water-Base 265 

Zinsser Co., Inc. VOC Pro Finisher Clear Lacquer Gloss 275 

WOOD COATINGS - OPAQUE: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 275 g/l 

Manufacturer or 

Parent Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Frazee Industries 566 Waterborne Lacquer Undercoater 48 

Frazee Industries 560 Waterborne Lacquer Undercoater 92 

Gemini Coatings, Inc. High Solids Waterborne Lacquer 231 

R.J. McGlennon Co. Inc. Aqualac Waterborne Lacquer Color Topcoats 225 

Simpson Coatings Group, Inc. Satin Black ESL 157 

Trinity Coatings Co. Aqualac White Undercoater Waterborne Lacquer 212 

Trinity Coatings Co. Aqualac White Waterborne Lacquer 233 

Trinity Coatings Co. Nitro Waterborne White Lacquer Undercoater 195 

Trinity Coatings Co. Waterborne Black Lacquer 223 

Trinity Coatings Co. Waterborne Quick Dry Lacquer 203 

Trinity Coatings Co. Waterborne Terracotta Lacquer 228 

Trinity Coatings Co. White Lacquer Undercoat 274 

Trinity Coatings Co. White Waterborne Lacquer 218 

Valspar Corporation Enviro + Plus Water Based White Topcoat, 20 Sheen 227 

Valspar Corporation Enviro + Plus Water Based White Undercoat 195 

Valspar Corporation White Undercoat - XLO - 200 VOC 197 

Vista Paint Corporation Aqua Lac Undercoat 144 

ZINC-RICH PRIMER: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 340 g/l 

Manufacturer or Parent 

Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Carboline Company Carboline 858 257 

Carboline Company Carbozinc 11 WB 0 

Carboline Company Carbozinc 621 336 

Carboline Company Carbozinc 859 328 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Catha-Coat 302HA Reinforced Inorganic Zinc Primer 295 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Catha-Coat 302V 246 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Catha-Coat 304V Ethyl Silicate Inorganic Zinc Coating 311 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Catha-Coat 305 Water Based Inorganic Zinc Coating 0 

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Catha-Coat 316 Organic Zinc Rich Primer 241 

Jones-Blair Co. Chem-O-Z HS2 Organic Zinc Rich Primer 236 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Corothane I Galva Pac One Pack Zinc Primer 299 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Fast-Clad Zinc HS Reinforced Zinc Primer 321 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Zinc Clad II Plus Inorganic Zinc-Rich Coating 313 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Zinc Clad VI Zinc Rich Epoxy 122 

Sherwin-Williams Co. Zinc Clad XI Water Based Inorganic Zinc Silicate Coating 25 

Sigma Coatings USA B.V. Sigma Tornusil MC 58 II 141 
DRAFT

ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings Compliant Product Lists 

Compliant Product List.doc 29 21-May-07 

ZINC-RICH PRIMER: 

Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 340 g/l 

Manufacturer or Parent 

Company Product Name 

VOC 

Reg. 

(g/l) 

Sigma Coatings USA B.V. Sigmacover Zinc Primer II 314 

Tnemec Company Inc. Hydro-Zinc Series 91-H2O 317 

Tnemec Company Inc. Perimeprime Series 394 330 

Tnemec Company Inc. Purple Prime Series 1 330 

Tnemec Company Inc. Tneme-Zinc Series 90-97 321 

Valspar Corporation Valspar Zinc Dust Primer 40