alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 98

Requiring the House of Representatives to take any legislative action necessary to verify the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment as

part of the Constitution when the legislatures of an additional three

States ratify the Equal Rights Amendment.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 22, 2001

Mr. ANDREWS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Requiring the House of Representatives to take any legislative action necessary to verify the ratification of the

Equal Rights Amendment as part of the Constitution

when the legislatures of an additional three States ratify

the Equal Rights Amendment.

1 Resolved, That, when the legislatures of an additional

2 three States ratify the Equal Rights Amendment, the

3 House of Representatives shall take any legislative action

4 necessary to verify the ratification of the Equal Rights

5 Amendment as part of the Constitution.

Æ
From: William Maxwell

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 7:51:07 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

William Maxwell

501 N. Jefferson St

Vandalia, MO 63382
From: Sandra Salinas

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 8:44:56 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Sandra Salinas
San Antonio, Texas
From: Cindy Gould

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Against abortion and funding

Date: Friday, August 05, 2011 6:35:26 PM

Now it sounds like Catholics are being penalized. Put this money into supporting adoption.

Sent from my iPhone
N. Y. COMMON PLEAS.

#### Thomas B. Gunning agt. William H. Appleton and others.

*Who may grant an ex pa/rte order in action pending in one of the city*courts— *Code of Oirnl Procedure, section*772.

Under the Code of Civil Procedure, an *ex pa/rte*order in an action pending in one of the city courts is good if obtained from a judge of any of the superior city courts.

Motion to vacate order of a judge of the superior court, extending time to answer in an action in this court. •

*J. E. Gronly,*for plaintiff, for motion to vacate.

*Douglas Oampbell,*for defendants, opposed.

Beach, J.

The order was granted by a judge of the superior court, and for that reason claimed to be void.

Section 277 of the Code of Civil Procedure confers additional power upon a county judge to grant orders in an action pending in a superior city court. It does not affect the disposition of this motion. Section 354 relates solely to the granting of orders in actions pending in county courts. This *511section is inapplicable, because, while the law has conferred upon the court of common pleas portions of the jurisdiction of the county courts in other counties *(Code, sec.*286 *et seq.),*yet that falls far short of making this court a county court, and, therefore, subject to the provisions of title *5*of the Code of Civil Procedure, section 340 *et seq.*

I think authority to make an order similar to the one granted in this case is expressly conferred by section 772 of the Code. The order here is therefore valid.

Even were the views above expressed incorrect, the motion must be denied. The order complained of was granted June sixteenth; on June twenty-eighth the plaintiff’s attorney admitted due service of an order to strike out parts of the complaint, and likewise, on June thirtieth, of a demurrer to the complaint, and also, on September twenty-second, of a notice of trial of the issue of law. By these acts I think the plaintiff’s attorney waived any question arising under the order of June sixteenth extending the time to answer.

The motion is denied, with ten dollars costs to abide the event.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Marilyn Ridenour, B.S.N., M.P.H., Scientific Review Official, Office of Extramural Programs, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1095 Willowdale Road, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505. Telephone: (304) 285-5879; Email:                         *MRidenour@cdc.gov.*

                        The Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and                               ( print page 60211)                            Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Kalwant Smagh,

Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2023-18806 Filed 8-30-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     9
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
       
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                 10904
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                 0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                       2300
<TRADING-ASSETS>                       0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>            127651
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                 74147
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                   74308
<LOANS>                                397866
<ALLOWANCE>                            3202
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         638942
<DEPOSITS>                             493334
<SHORT-TERM>                           0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                    7369
<LONG-TERM>                            30000
<COMMON>                               904
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<OTHER-SE>                             107335
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>         638942
<INTEREST-LOAN>                        7580
<INTEREST-INVEST>                      3293
<INTEREST-OTHER>                       136
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                       11009
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                     5016
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     5571
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                  5432
<LOAN-LOSSES>                          1274
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                     1676
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                        3751
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        2619
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>             2619
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                           1668
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                         7.24
<LOANS-NON>                            4477
<LOANS-PAST>                           1023
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                       192
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                        3261
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                       2589
<CHARGE-OFFS>                          688
<RECOVERIES>                           27
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                      3202
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                   3202
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                    0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                0
        

</TABLE>
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.17 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (5.35 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Task Force 55 Welcomes New Commander at Pierside Ceremony in Bahrain
 
  By Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Mark Thomas Mahmod
  The task force responsible for U.S. 5th Fleet’s surface forces welcomed a new commander during a change of command ceremony in Bahrain, Nov. 29. Capt. Anthony Webber relieved Capt. Robert Francis as the commander of Task Force 55 and Destroyer Squadron 50 during the pierside ceremony next to guided-missile destroyer USS Delbert D. Black (DDG 119). Francis assumed command of Task Force 55 in July 2021. During a 16-month tour, he oversaw the decommissioning and of transfer of five Navy patrol coastal ships to Bahrain, integration of the Coast Guard’s newly arrived fast response cutters, and the Navy’s first littoral combat ship deployment to the Middle East. “The officers and Sailors that [crew] our ships are the true heroes of Task Force 55, and I thank them for making a big difference each and every day,” said Francis. “It has been a true honor to serve as your commodore.” Francis also served as the first commander of a multinational task force launched by the Combined Maritime Forces in April. Combined Task Force 153 provides maritime security in the Red Sea, Bab al-Mandeb and Gulf of Aden. Francis is next scheduled to report to the office of the Chief of Naval Operations in Washington, D.C., where he will join the staff for operations, plans and strategy. Webber assumes command of Task Force 55 after serving as deputy commander. He previously completed a tour in Bahrain as the executive assistant to Vice Adm. Brad Cooper, commander of U.S. Naval Forces Central Command, U.S. 5th Fleet and Combined Maritime Forces. “We have a mission to execute and we can only do it as a team,” Webber told the task force staff during the ceremony. “Let’s get after it.” The U.S. 5th Fleet operating area includes 21 countries, the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, Red Sea, parts of the Indian Ocean and three critical choke points at the Strait of Hormuz, Bab al-Mandeb and Suez Canal.
President hails Iraq city withdrawal as 'important step'
 By John J. Kruzel , American Forces Press Service
  
 WASHINGTON (June 30, 2009) – President Barack Obama hailed the completed withdrawal of U.S. combat forces from Iraqi cities today as “an important step forward” and a testament to the commitment of American troops. In accordance with the status of forces agreement between the United States and Iraq, only a contingent of U.S. trainers and advisors will remain as brigades and battalions depart the cities, where Iraqi forces now have primary authority. “Today, American troops have transferred control of all Iraqi cities and towns to Iraq’s government and security forces,” Obama said, as an audience at the White House East Room applauded. “This is an important step forward, as a sovereign and united Iraq continues to take control of its own destiny.” The move represents part of the U.S. strategy to responsibly end the war, said Obama, who has begun implementing the phased drawdown of U.S. combat brigades from Iraq to be completed by Aug. 31, 2010. The president said Iraqis were rightly treating the day as a celebration, with news reports from Baghdad describing Iraqis marking the day with a military parade and Baghdad declaring a national holiday. Obama said that while the U.S. will remain an ally, today’s progress in Iraq comes with added responsibility. “Iraq’s future is in the hands of its own people,” he said. “And Iraq’s leaders must now make some hard choices necessary to resolve key political questions, to advance opportunity, and to provide security for their towns and their cities.” Obama said today’s bombing in Kirkuk, which reportedly killed as many as 41 people, underscores that violence in Iraq will continue and that “difficult days” loom. But he expressed confidence, however, that insurgent forces would fail. “The future belongs to those who build, not those who destroy,” he said. “And today’s transition is further proof that those who have tried to pull Iraq into the abyss of disunion and civil war are on the wrong side of history.” The fact that Iraqis are celebrating today’s transfer of authority is a testament to the courage, capability and commitment of Americans who have served in Iraq, Obama said. “Through tour after tour of duty, our troops have overcome every obstacle to extend this precious opportunity to the Iraqi people,” he said. “These women and men are not always in the headlines, but they’re in our hearts and prayers, and we will forever honor their selfless service and sacrifice, as well as the service and sacrifice of their families. “There is more work to be done, but we’ve made important progress in supporting a sovereign, stable and self-reliant Iraq. And everyone who has served there, both in uniform as well as our civilians, deserves our thanks.”
From: Mary Bailey

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Monday, August 08, 2011 11:19:03 AM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Mary Bailey
Tomahawh, Wisconsin
----

(2004/C 84 E/0611)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0103/04

by Paulo Casaca (PSE) to the Commission

(22 January 2004)

Subject:   Water for human consumption

Can the Commission tell me whether direct or indirect references in European legislation to minimum pressure levels for water for private consumption are being respected?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(5 March 2004)

There are no criteria set out in Community environmental legislation for minimum pressure levels for water supplied by distribution systems.

The Drinking Water Directive (1) of 1998 establishes clear and binding criteria for the quality of drinking water from the tap provided to consumers of water supply systems.

----

(1)  Council Directive 98/83/EC of 3 November 1998 concerning the quality of water intended for human consumption, OJ L 330, 5.12.1998.

----