alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Gevity HR, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers
of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                     |  |                                 
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------
|Dated:  May 10, 2004 |  | /s/ ERIK VONK                   
|                     |  | Erik VonkChief Executive Officer
|                     |  |                                 

|                     |  |                                           
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Dated:  May 10, 2004 |  | /s/ PETER C. GRABOWSKI                    
|                     |  | Peter C. GrabowskiChief Financial Officer)
|                     |  |
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12

- 11226 Summary Calendar

MARCUS DWAYNE MAYBERRY , Petitioner

- Appellant

v.
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION , Respondent

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:97

- CV

- 2592

Before WIENER, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Plaintiff

- Appellant Marcus Dwayne Mayber ry, Texas prisoner # 605575, filed a motion in his original 1997 habeas proceeding for free copies of documents filed in his case . T he magistrate judge (MJ) denied the motion because Mayberry’s habeas case was closed and he had not established any basis for further filings in the case. The district court denied Mayberry ’s

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 20, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 12-11226 Document: 00512539421 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/20/2014No. 12

- 11226
objection to the MJ’s order and his motion for rec onsideration, and Mayberry now appeals the district cour t’s denial of those motions. We do not consider Mayberry’s argument, raised for the first time on appeal, that his constitutional ri ghts have been violated based on his in ability to obtain free copies of court records. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 22 2, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). Neither will we consider the arguments raised for the first time in Mayberry’s reply brief, which includ e his complaints concerning the dismissal of his appeal in Mayberry v. Thaler , No. 13

- 10077

. See United States
v. Jimenez , 509 F.3d 682, 693 n.10 (5th Cir. 2007)

. Contrary to Mayberry’s contention , neither 28 U.S.C. § 2250 n or 28 U.S.C. § 1915(c) provides him with a basis for request ing free copies of documents filed in his closed habeas case. M ayberry’s motion for documents

wa s a “meaningless, unauthorized motion ” over which the district court had no jurisdiction. See United States v. Early , 27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir. 1994). We
t he refore AFFIRM district court’s orders denying Mayberry’s objection to the MJ’s order and denying h is motion for reconsideration . We also WARN Mayberry that if he continues to file repetitious and frivolous filings requesting free copies of court records, he could face sanctions, including dismissal, monetary sanctions, or restrictions on his ability to file pleadings in this court or any court subject to this court’s jurisdiction

.

2 Case: 12-11226 Document: 00512539421 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/20/2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 15, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-29-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-15-1999
<CASH>                                               2,543
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                            965
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     4,175
<PP&E>                                              34,286
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      43,353
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                4,452
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               104
<OTHER-SE>                                          23,477
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        43,353
<SALES>                                             12,796
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    12,796
<CGS>                                                3,552
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       11,290
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1,060
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        205
<INCOME-TAX>                                            76
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           129
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.01



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 482 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 482

  Honoring Ted Williams and extending the condolences of the House of 
                     Representatives on his death.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 2002

  Mr. Markey (for himself, Mr. Frank, Mr. Neal of Massachusetts, Mr. 
    Olver, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Delahunt, Mr. Tierney, Mr. McGovern, Mr. 
 Capuano, and Mr. Lynch) submitted the following resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Honoring Ted Williams and extending the condolences of the House of 
                     Representatives on his death.

Whereas Theodore Samuel Williams served his country with honor and distinction 
        as a Naval Aviator during World War II and as a Marine fighter pilot 
        during the Korean War;
Whereas Ted Williams, during his service in the Marines during the Korean War, 
        flew on 39 combat missions and earned an Air Medal and two Gold Stars;
Whereas Ted Williams' exploits while playing baseball with the Boston Red Sox 
        from 1939-1960 led to him being referred to as ``the greatest hitter who 
        ever lived'';
Whereas during his career with the Boston Red Sox, Ted Williams had 2,654 total 
        hits, 521 home runs, and a lifetime batting average of .344, despite 
        losing almost five full seasons to military service;
Whereas as a member of the Boston Red Sox, Ted Williams hit for an average of 
        .406 in 1941 and is the last major league baseball player to hit for an 
        average above .400;
Whereas as a member of the Boston Red Sox, Ted Williams led the American League 
        in batting six times, in slugging percentage nine times, in total bases 
        six times, and in runs scored six times;
Whereas as a member of the Boston Red Sox, Ted Williams won two Triple Crowns, 
        was twice named the Most Valuable Player of the American League, was 
        chosen as an American League All-Star 16 times, and was named the player 
        of the decade for the 1950's;
Whereas Ted Williams had a career on-base percentage of .481, the highest in the 
        history of the major leagues;
Whereas Ted Williams was elected to the Baseball Hall of Fame in 1966; and
Whereas Ted Williams provided invaluable assistance to the Commonwealth of 
        Massachusetts through his efforts on behalf of and support for the Jimmy 
        Fund in order to help eradicate cancer in children: Now, therefore, be 
        it;
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors the outstanding 
accomplishments of Ted Williams and expresses its deepest sympathies 
and condolences to the family of Ted Williams on his passing.
                                 <all>
```
#### Leonard Y. Gardiner and another, Plaintiffs, v. Gabriel Schwab and others, Defendants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Bockes, J.
From: Jasmine Ong

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 2:49:56 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Jasmine Ong

7744 W Shawnee St

Muskogee, OK 74401
From: Diana B

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women :)

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 10:37:31 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

This is fantastic news! I'm ecstatic for this major step toward preventative health care :) For so long

I've felt remorse toward our insurance companies for their lack of birth control coverage. They sure

don't make it easy for us to afford the pill! Let alone the doctor visits, check-ups and re-fills. Isn't that

why we have insurance to help alleviate the costs? Critics cry that the boosting in coverage will

encourage young teens to have sex because 'it's so readily available.' Well, so is sex! It's right there,

ready to be had...by all ages. Bottom line, humans procreate. Plain and simple. Here's an idea, let's

finally embrace this matter of fact of life (religion aside please) and focus on the real issues at hand, for

example the growing population and disease...and of course women's rights :)

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Diana B

Broomall

Broomall, PA 19008
From: George Wolfe

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Friday, August 05, 2011 12:08:58 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

George Wolfe
Portland, Oregon
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         5488548
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                114456
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    4899417
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         7422271
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           7423168
<LOANS>                                      125427436
<ALLOWANCE>                                     991454
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               154143460
<DEPOSITS>                                   112177979
<SHORT-TERM>                                  24015972
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1859787
<LONG-TERM>                                    3602639
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               154143460
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                2665741
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               168980
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 63572
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               2898293
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             1170111
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1501641
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          1396652
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    18000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1481597
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 360938
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      360938
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    225459
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.00
<LOANS-NON>                                    1065000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               1738000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                2117145
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                974448
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      994
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               991454
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            991454
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.3 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

Nos. 06-08-00120-CR & 06-08-00121-CR

______________________________

SANTIAGO TELLEZ ROSALES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

On Appeal from the 8th Judicial District Court

Hopkins County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 0417619 & 0417620

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Santiago Tellez Rosales appeals from his convictions of indecency with a child and criminal

attempt-sexual assault of a child. Rosales' sentence was imposed May 24, 2006. The Texas Court

of Criminal Appeals granted out-of-time appeals, and Rosales' notices of appeal were filed June 16,

2008. The clerk's records were filed July 23, 2008, and, after a show-cause hearing by this Court,

the reporter's record was filed in these companion cases on January 27, 2009. Due to the death of

appellant's counsel's father and counsel's own illness, we granted extraordinary extensions of time,

and counsel filed Rosales' brief on July 13, 2009. The State's brief was therefore due on or before

August 12, 2009. The Court granted an extension of thirty days, making the brief due September 11,

2009. 

When no brief had been received by this Court by September 23, and being aware that the

assistant district attorney Samantha Crouch (the attorney of record for the State in this case) had left

the employ of the Hopkins County District Attorney's Office, our clerk's office called the district

attorney's office and left a message. To date, that message has not been returned, and neither a brief

nor a motion to extend time to file the brief has been received.

We now order Martin Braddy, district attorney of Hopkins County, to file, or to cause his

designee to file, a brief, to be received by this Court on or before October 20, 2009. 
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: September 29, 2009
#### Hannah Alexander, Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. Emma A. Sumner, Appellant.

judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
HILLS
                                 BANCORPORATION
                                   EXHIBIT 11


                STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON
                          AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARES
<TABLE>



                                                                      Year Ended December 31,
                                                              ---------------------------------
                                                                 1996       1995        1994
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                           <C>         <C>         <C> 


Shares of common stock, beginning .........................   1,463,604   1,463,319   1,462,866
                                                              =================================

Shares of common stock, ending ............................   1,465,385   1,463,606   1,463,319
                                                              =================================
Computation of weighted average number of common and
   common equivalent shares:
   Common shares outstanding at the beginning of the year .   1,463,604   1,463,319   1,462,866
   Weighted average number of shares issued ...............       1,780          --          --
   Weighted average of the common equivalent shares
      attributable to stock options granted, computed under
      the treasury stock method ...........................      13,968       9,465       6,480
                                                              ---------------------------------
              Weighted average number of common and
                 common equivalent shares .................   1,479,352   1,472,784   1,469,346
                                                              =================================

Net income (In Thousands) .................................   $   6,144  $    5,257  $    4,934
                                                              =================================

Earnings per common and common equivalent share ...........   $    4.15  $     3.57  $     3.36
                                                              =================================

Dividends per common share ................................   $    0.95  $     0.87  $     0.80
                                                              =================================
</TABLE>


The above information is retroactively restated for a three-for-one stock split
in 1996.