alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1018 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1018

         To provide market loss assistance for apple producers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 12, 2001

   Mr. Levin (for himself, Ms. Snowe, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Schumer, Ms. 
 Stabenow, and Ms. Cantwell) introduced the following bill; which was 
read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and 
                                Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To provide market loss assistance for apple producers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MARKET LOSS ASSISTANCE FOR APPLE PRODUCERS.

    (a) Assistance Available.--The Secretary of Agriculture shall use 
the funds, facilities, and authorities of the Commodity Credit 
Corporation, in an amount not to exceed $250,000,000, to make payments, 
as soon as practicable after the date of the enactment of this Act, to 
apple producers to provide relief for the loss of markets during the 
2000 crop year.
    (b) Payment Quantity.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), the payment 
        quantity of apples for which the producers on a farm are 
        eligible for payments under this section shall be equal to the 
        quantity of the 2000 crop of apples produced by the producers 
        on the farm.
            (2) Maximum quantity.--The payment quantity of apples for 
        which the producers on a farm are eligible for payments under 
        this section shall not exceed 20,000,000 pounds of apples 
        produced on the farm.
    (c) Limitations.--Subject to subsection (b)(2), the Secretary shall 
not establish a payment limitation, or gross income eligibility 
limitation, with respect to payments made under this section.
    (d) Applicability.--This section applies only with respect to the 
2000 crops of apples and producers of that crop.
                                 <all>
```
Colonia Chiropractic Center ~.'.. , . FrankA.Stiso,DC, PA . ' , A Profes::ionaJ. Con:::oration 	 t • "', J'.... 

"'I' -" J'~ '. ~Ir~ ~ ~ i' 	 732-381-0375 (offiCe) 

732-381-6410 (fax) Frank A. Stiso, DC, CCSP, FICC 124 Inman Avenue" Michele E!Stiso, DC " Colonia NJ 07067 Darlene P. Stiso, DC 

Frank R. Stiso, DC 

August 9, 2010 

Office ofConsumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department ofHealth and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

-P:O:Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Below are my comments regarding the Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health 

Insurance Coverage Relating to Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection 

and Affordable Care Act (PP ACA). 

1"t,}: ,.," )._\. ,,~...... ~~"',~"." .. '::::;., 

I believe that every effort should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by PP ACA, 

especially as ofJanuary 1, 2014 when most. ofthe reform components (Insurance Exchanges, 

Subsidies, Tax Credits, etc.) come into play: '" >. ._ 

The average consumer has a broad definition of "benefits." Consumers view their health plan 

beyond the covered benefits, cost sharing, and the contribution levels associated with the plan. 

It is my opinion that the Rule may still result in some confusion to the marketplace in its 

application. For example, if an employer raised the copayment level beyond the maximum in one 

area (i.e. outpatient services) but retained the copayment level for primary care doctor visits, does 

that mean a loss of grandfather status? Clarity will be critical both for the employer and the . employe·e. ....., - ,,-"-"-.....-­

Even by the most optimistic estimates, a substantial portion ofthe employee population will remain 

outside the PPACA as ofJanuary 2014 based on the current rules. While I understand the difficulty 

involved in making change, creating another large sub-population of excluded individuals will only 

add to costs, increase confusion, and mitigate the potential impact ofthe legislation. 

The Rule needs to be clear, reasonable, and with no ambiguities involved in determining whether a 

group health plan is "in or out." The decisions the federal government makes today will determine 

the outcomes for tomorrow. We may need to make some difficult decisions to create a sustainable 

health care system that will support a growing economy in the future. That means getting as many 

citizens across the country participating at the beginning to make it work and delivering on iis 

promises to retain their support. 	 ... 

Thank you for the opportunity to c:O"fl?,~~~~~~~ 

Frank A. Stiso, DC, FICC, CCSP
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                   SUBSIDIARIES OF ZYGO CORPORATION (DELAWARE)

Technical Instrument Company (California)
100% owned by Registrant (effective as of August 8, 1996)

Syncotec Neue Technologien und Instrumente GmbH
100% owned by Technical Instrument Company (effective as of September 1, 1997)

NexStar Corporation (Colorado)
100% owned by Registrant (effective as of September 12, 1996)

TechniStar Corporation (Delaware)
25% owned by NexStar Corporation

Sight Systems, Inc. (California)
100% owned by Registrant (effective as of August 19, 1997)

Zygo TeraOptix, Inc. (Delaware)
100% owned by Registrant (effective as of May 5, 2000)

Zygo KK
100% owned by Registrant (effective as of October 1, 1999)

Zygo PTE
100% owned by Registrant (effective as of January 1, 1998)

ZygoLOT GmbH
60% owned by Registrant (effective as of October 2, 1999)

Six Brookside Drive (Connecticut)
100% owned by Registrant (effective as of January 9, 1998)
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 90 Agreed to House (ATH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 90

 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 2001

Mr. Turner submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and she is hereby, 
elected to the following standing committee of the House of 
Representatives:
    Committee on Standards of Official Conduct: Mrs. Jones of Ohio.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         August 31, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on August 22, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 785 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2023-240, CP2023-243.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-18792 Filed 8-30-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Joint NCESNAGB Retreat 

on NAEP

Education 

Information 

Advisory 

Committee

(EIAC) meeting

NAEP

Contractors’

meeting

Assessment 

Division office 

moved to

1990 K St, NW

DAC meeting

Large-Scale 

Assessment 

Conference

NISS Writing 

Trend Issues 

meeting

NVS meeting

Summary Data 

Tool training

“My School”

site went live 

for field 

operations

NVS meeting

First on-line 

chat with 

NCES Acting 

Commissioner 

Gary Phillips

DAC meeting

NAEP

Invitational 

Symposium NAEP

Contractors’

meeting

Peggy Carr 

named NCES 

Associate 

Commissioner

for Assessment 

Division

EIAC meeting

NRC/NAS BOTA

Workshop on 

the media and 

assessment

 NAEP

ollection

gins

Main NAEP

data collection

ends

NAEP Validity 

Studies Panel 

(NVS) meeting

State data 

collection Design and 

Analysis 

Committee 

(DAC) meeting

Market Basket 

Assessment 

Workshop at 

NRC/NAS

“Matrix 

Sampling”

presentation

ETS 

demonstration 

of “Problem 

Solver” software

Ja

a

y 3

January 7

January 31

–March 3

February 3

February 4

–

5

February 7

–

8

February 15

March 8

March 16

March 21

March 27

March 31

April 14

April 17

May 19

May 26 

June 2

June 2

–

3

June 25

–28

July 11

July 31

–August 2

August 8

August 22

August 24

September 8

September 11

 September 14

October 9

October 17

–19

October 19

October 20

–21

November 19 

November 30

–December 1 

December 1 

2000 Highlights

Milestone events, meetings, and publication release dates
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 23.19


                                DELOITTE & TOUCH


                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent public accountants of Trinet Venture Capital Ltd., we hereby
consent to the incorporation of our report dated March 11, 2002, included in
Form 10-K of Ampal-American Israel Corporation for the year ended December
31, 2001 (relating to the financial statements of Trinet Venture Capital Ltd.
not included herein), into Ampal-American Israel Corporation's previously
filed Registration Statements No. 333-61895 and No. 333-55970.


                                 Brightman, Almagor & Co.
                               Certified Public Accountants

March 21, 2002



                                       19
#### Gardner B Chapin, Appellant, v. Julia C. Chapin, Executrix, Respondent.

Order affirmed with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                        Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 14,
2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule of the IT Group, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 29, 2000 in the following Registration
Statements:

        . Registration Statement (Form S-8; No. 2-95647 and No. 33-11486) and
          the related Prospectus pertaining to The IT Group, Inc. 1983 Stock
          Incentive Plan,

        . Registration Statement (Form S-8; No. 33-52974) and the related
          Prospectus pertaining to the 1991 Stock Option Plan,

        . Registration Statement (Form S-8; No. 33-60861) relating to shares
          of restricted stock to the issued under the Special Turnaround Plan,

        . Registration Statement (Form S-8; No. 33-6081) relating to the
          additional shares under the 1991 Stock Incentive Plan,

        . Registration Statement (Form S-8; No. 333-00651) relating to shares
          issued under the IT Corporation Retirement Plan,

        . Registration Statement (Form S-8; No. 333-27821) and the related
          Prospectus pertaining to the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan,

        . Registration Statement (Form S-8; No. 333-26143 and 333-57065) and
          in the related Prospectus pertaining to the 1997 The IT Group, Inc.
          Nonemployee Director Stock Plan Director Fees, and

        . Registration Statement (Form S-8; No. 333-55388) and in the related
          Prospectus pertaining to the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, the
          Corporation Restoration Plan, and the Stock Option Incentive
          Compensation Program.


                                                  /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 20, 2001
Exhibit 32.2

         Certification of Chief Financial Officer of FirstBank NW Corp.
    Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
                         the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of FirstBank
NW Corp. ("the Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report"),
I, Larry K. Moxley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     o    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and


     o    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the Company's financial condition and results of
          operations.






/s/ LARRY K. MOXLEY
-----------------------------
Larry K. Moxley,
Chief Financial Officer

Dated:  February 13, 2006
#### SUPERIOR FINANCE CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. JOHN A. McCRANE MOTORS, INCORPORATED. RESPONDENT.

Submitted May term, 1933

Decided October 19, 1933.

*858Before Justices Parker, Lloyd and Perskie.

For the appellant, *Feder & Binzler.*

For the respondent, *Cohn <& Kohlreiter.*

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment in the District Court. Forty-three specifications of determination with which the appellant, plaintiff below, is dissatisfied are filed, nine of which are argued.

The action was on a guaranty of a promissory note drawn to the order of J. A. McCrane Motors Company and endorsed and guaranteed by the latter and one Di Franko, not a party to this litigation.

There was a judgment in the court below in favor of the defendant. The defenses were in substance that the note had been paid and that it was accompanied by the conditional sales agreement of an automobile, the terms of which had not been complied with, and that recovery on the note was conditional thereon.

The points argued for reversal are in substance that the' conditional sales agreement was irrelevant to the issue, that it was improperly submitted to the jury for consideration, and that there was no proof of payment.

*We*think both of these points are properly taken. As to the first, there was error in the instruction to the jury bjr the judge with respect to the- effect of the conditional sales agreement as a defense to the action on the note. There was no proof showing that the note and the agreement, which were received in evidence, had any relation in a contractual sense the one to the other.

As to the second, the defendant’s contention was that a clerk in the office of the plaintiff’s attorney had agreed with the maker to compromise the amount due on the note, and that this released the guarantors. While there was proof of such an agreement there was no proof of authority in the *859clerk to make it, and it is well settled that an attorney having a claim for collection cannot compromise it except upon express authority of the client. *Watts*v. Frenche, 19 *N. J. Eq.*407; *Trenton Street Railway Co.*v. *Lawlor,*74 *Id.*828; 71 *Atl. Rep.*234. Much more would this be true when applied to the clerk of such an attorney.

For these reasons the judgment will be reversed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM " THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS" AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,966
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   100
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     47,804
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           1,967
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             1,969
<LOANS>                                        106,153
<ALLOWANCE>                                        250
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 163,186
<DEPOSITS>                                     100,715
<SHORT-TERM>                                    20,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,561
<LONG-TERM>                                     10,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,602
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,308
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 163,186
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,404
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,474
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,878
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,750
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,208
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,670
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       35
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,736
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,048
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,048
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       636
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.78
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   215
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        1
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  250
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            250



</TABLE>
Archive
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hamptons Luxury Homes, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank Dalene, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Frank Dalene



Frank Dalene

Chief Financial Officer

September 12, 2005
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 22, 2014 

# Order

July 22, 2014

149276 & ( 64 )

UNISITE, LLC, f/k/a UNISITE, INC.

, Plaintiff

- Appell ee

,

v

JOEL L. YOUNG and BRENDA S. YOUNG

, Defendant s

- Appell ants.

and

TRISTAR INVESTORS, INC., and BIG TOP

VENTURES, L.L.C.,

Defendants

- Appellees

. SC: 149276

COA: 314150

Eaton CC: 12

- 000445

- CK

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the stipulation to dismiss the application for leave to

appeal is GRANTED. The dismissal is with prejudice and without costs or fees to any

party.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 23.13


                            PRICE WATERHOUSE COOPERS


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants of Ophirtech Ltd., we hereby consent to the
incorporation of our report dated February 21, 2002 on the financial
statements of Ophirtech Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2001 included in
this form 10K, into Ampal-American Israel Corporation's previously filed
Registration Statement File No. 333-61895 and No. 333-55970.


                                        Kesselman & Kesselman
                                  Certified Public Accountants (Isr)


March 21, 2002


                                       13