alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                     COLUMBIA ENERGY GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES
                Statements of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                 ($ in millions)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                            Twelve Months
                                                                                          Ended December 31,
                                                              ------        ------------------------------------------------
                                                               2001          2000          1999          1998          1997
                                                              ------        ------        ------        ------        ------
<S>                                                            <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Consolidated Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
before Income Taxes                                            389.2         449.0         556.1         461.1         397.0

Adjustments:
  Interest during construction                                  (2.2)         (2.2)         (2.8)         (2.1)         (3.0)
  Distributed (Undistributed) equity income                      2.2          (5.5)         (5.8)         (0.4)          3.6
  Fixed charges                                                177.9         192.8         183.8         163.3         180.5
                                                              ------        ------        ------        ------        ------
    Earnings Available                                         567.1         634.1         731.3         621.9         578.1
                                                              ------        ------        ------        ------        ------

Fixed Charges:
  Interest on long-term and short-term debt                    123.6         154.3         152.9         145.4         145.6
  Other interest                                                45.9          18.3          14.9           1.4          15.2
  Portion of rentals representing interest                       8.4          20.2          16.0          16.5          19.7
                                                              ------        ------        ------        ------        ------
Total Fixed Charges                                            177.9         192.8         183.8         163.3         180.5
                                                              ------        ------        ------        ------        ------

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                              3.19          3.29          3.98          3.81          3.20
                                                              ======        ======        ======        ======        ======
</TABLE>

Prior periods have been restated to reflect discontinued operations.
# 99041. U.S., NATO Allies Consult on Kosovo Crisis

```

By Linda D. Kozaryn
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON -- U.S. officials are consulting with NATO allies to 
see what course of action should be taken to deal with the 
latest violence in Kosovo. Designated NATO forces are now on 48-
hour alert.

Yugoslav forces killed more than 40 ethnic Albanians Jan. 15 in 
the village of Racak. Two unarmed international monitors shot 
during the massacre escaped serious injury. Two days later, 
Yugoslav officials expelled William Walker, the American head of 
the monitoring mission.

At the Pentagon Jan. 20, Defense Secretary William S. Cohen said 
Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic has clearly violated the 
cease-fire agreement he made last fall. 

"That is a breach of an agreement not only with NATO itself, but 
the Organization of Security Cooperation in Europe and virtually 
every organization that is currently trying to bring some peace 
and stability to that region," Cohen said. He said U.S. Army 
Gen. Wesley Clark, supreme allied commander Europe, and U.S. and 
NATO officials are consulting closely to determine actions to be 
taken.

NATO air strikes remain an option, the secretary said. "It's 
quite clear NATO has the capability to not only threaten air 
strikes, but to carry them out," he said. 

However, Cohen said, the United States does not intend to be an 
air force for the Kosovar Liberation Army. "We believe there 
should be an agreement dealing with providing greater autonomy 
for the Kosovars, but have not supported their drive for 
independence. So it's going to require compliance on both sides, 
not just one," he said.

Cohen repeated the view he voiced last fall: "NATO's credibility 
is on the line." In October, NATO approved an activation order 
for phased air strikes against Yugoslav forces and then put it 
on hold. "The activation order remains in effect, and we are 
prepared to execute that if that is the will of the NATO 
membership,� said Cohen. 

In response to the October threat of a NATO air campaign, 
Milosevic agreed to withdraw some military and special police 
forces from Kosovo and to allow international officials to 
monitor activities in the southern Yugoslav province. 

Since then, persistent conflicts and sporadic violence have 
continued, and tensions have steadily increased between Yugoslav 
forces and ethnic Albanian liberation forces. The Jan. 15 
massacre, witnessed by international monitors, brought the 
crisis to boiling.

Two days before the attack, Clark told the newspaper �Stars and 
Stripes" that the relative peace in Kosovo was very fragile. He 
said widespread fighting will return to Kosovo if a new 
agreement between ethnic Albanian rebels and Yugoslav officials 
isn't reached in the coming weeks. 

He predicted the combination of ongoing rebel buildups, growing 
Serbian frustration and better weather would prompt both sides 
to either sign a peace deal or return to civil war. "When these 
things come together in the February-March time frame, we're 
going to reach a period of great danger," Clark said Jan. 13 
while visiting NATO forces in Macedonia. 

##END##
```
#### Lewis Anderson *v.*The Board of Commissioners of Jefferson County.

No compensation is allowed by law for services rendered under an appointment by the Court of Common Pleas, as required by the act of March 13, 1872 (69 Ohio L. 42), of suitable persons to assist the prosecuting attorney in examining the annual report of county commissioners.

Application for writ of mandamus.

At the November term of the Common Pleas of Jefferson county, the plaintiff, with one John McClave, was appointed by the court to aid the prosecuting attorney of the county in the investigation and examination of the annual report of the commissioners of the county, touching their official transactions during the year next preceding the second Monday of September, 1873, and their statement of the financial affairs of the county. The appointment was made under the provisions of the seventh section of the act of April 8,1856, as amended March 13,1872. 69 Ohio L. 42. The appointment was accepted, and the duties thereof performed. Afterward, on the 5th day of September, 1874, the plaintiff presented his account for said services, amounting to $300, to the commissioners, for their allowance; and the commissioners then and there refused to audit and allow the same, or any part thereof, on the ground “ that they had no right or jurisdiction to act in the premises.”

The aid of this court, by writ of mandamus, is now sought to compel the commissioners to act in the matter.

*John Me Clave £ J. F. Dayton,*for plaintiff.

By the Court.

This writ must be refused. The statute under which the appointment was made, and in pursuance of which the service was rendered, makes no provision for compensation for such services. Where a service for the benefit of the public is required by law, and no provision for its payment is made, it must be regarded as gratuitous, and no claim for compensation can be enforced.

*Writ refused.*
From: Shaun Doughty [mailto:mongo@batelco.com.bh] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 10:15 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

Leave my money alone!!!!
From: Anita Beckwith

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 10:04:42 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Anita Beckwith
Homewood, Alabama
##### U.S. Geological Survey

Digital Data Series DDS-42

# Gravity Map of Nevada

### by David A. Ponce

### 1997

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Gordon P. Eaton, Director

### Summary

This publication consists of a report presented in Acrobat PDF format (560 KB), a large gravity-station-location map (PDF; 3.1 MB), and a data directory (12 MB).

Gravity data for the entire state of Nevada and adjacent parts of California, Utah, and Arizona are available on CD-ROM (see "Availability" below) and on this Web site (see Data Files, below).  About 80,000 gravity stations were compiled primarily from the National Geophysical Data Center and the U.S. Geological Survey.  Gravity data were reduced to the Geodetic Reference System of 1967 and adjusted to the International Gravity Standardization Net 1971 gravity datum.  Data were processed to complete Bouguer and isostatic gravity anomalies by applying standard gravity corrections including terrain corrections and isostatic corrections.  A 1_README.TXT (see below) file describes the contents of the CD-ROM and includes a description of the data reduction process, selected principal fact references, and a list of sources for data from the National Geophysical Data Center.



#### To view this report, which is in PDF format, you will need Adobe Reader.

See the report.



See the README file.

---

#### Data Files

Data are organized into 19 files, one for each of the 18 1 X 2 degree quadrangles that cover Nevada as well as a single file containing all the data.  You can download any of the 19 data files from the /DATA folder.  These file names end in .iso.txt (for "isostatic") and are ASCII files

You can also download all of the data at once in a compressed .zip file (DDS_42_DATA.zip; 4.2 MB).  The 19 files in this archive have the .txt file extension added.

---

To contact the author, email Dave Ponce (ponce@usgs.gov).



---

### Availability of this publication

This report is for sale on CD-ROM from:

U.S. Geological Survey

Information Services, National Mapping Division

Box 25046

Denver Federal Center

Denver, CO  80225-0046 

Telephone: (888) ASK-USGS

ISBN:  0-607-86636-5

Current pricing information is available from http://ask.usgs.gov/to_order.html.

---

The URL of this page is 
https://pubs.usgs.gov/dds/dds-42/
Date created: February 12, 1999
Last modified: October 22, 2009
EXHIBIT 12



ALPHAMA INC. and SUBSIDIARIESCOMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(In thousands, except for ratio data)

|                                                                           | 2000     | 2001(1)   | 2002(1)    | 2003    | 2004(1)   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------- | --------- | ---------- | ------- | ----------
|Income (loss) from continuing operations before provision for income taxes | $76,028  | $(37,136) | $(156,282) | $24,121 | $(253,598)
|Add:                                                                       |          |           |            |         |           
|Portion of rents representative of    the interest factor                  | 3,055    | 3,343     | 4,189      | 4,689   | 4,356     
|Interest on indebtedness                                                   | 45,183   | 45,467    | 71,496     | 59,667  | 56,324    
|Amortization of debt expense                                               | 2,070    | 6,022     | 4,727      | 3,941   | 2,737     
|Amortization of interest capitalized                                       | 455      | 450       | 335        | 23      | 25        
|                                                                           |          |           |            |         |           
|Income (loss) as adjusted                                                  | $126,791 | $18,146   | $(75,535)  | $92,441 | $(190,156)
|                                                                           |          |           |            |         |           
|Fixed charges                                                              |          |           |            |         |           
|Interest on indebtedness (a)                                               | $45,183  | $ 45,467  | $ 71,496   | $59,667 | $56,324   
|Interest capitalized (b)                                                   | 1,265    | 2,232     | 1,904      | 167     | 405       
|Amortization of debt expense (c)                                           | 2,070    | 6,022     | 4,727      | 3,941   | 2,737     
|Rent expense                                                               | 9,164    | 10,029    | 12,567     | 14,068  | 13,068    
|Portion of rents representative of    the interest factor (d)              | 3,055    | 3,343     | 4,189      | 4,689   | 4,356     
|                                                                           |          |           |            |         |           
|Fixed charges (a+b+c+d)                                                    | $51,573  | $57,064   | $82,316    | $68,464 | $63,822   
|                                                                           |          |           |            |         |           
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                         | 2.46     | --        | --         | 1.35    | --        

(1)	Earnings in 2001, 2002 and 2004 were not sufficient to cover fixed charges.  The deficiency of earnings was $38,918 in 2001, $157,851 in 2002 and $253,978 in 2004.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of 1 

~6G--IIY<lJ2-/6 

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 


PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS 


BRANCH 


As of: August 20, 2010 

Received: August 09,2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 20, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2cbad 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0216 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: Liz Ann Phelps 

Address: 

Wishek, NO, 58495 

Email: bookworm@bektel.com 

General Comment 

See attached file(s) 

Attachments 

IRS-2010-0010-0216.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

https:llfdms.erulemaking.net!fdms-web-agency/ component! submitter InfoCover Page?Call=... 8/20/201 0 
August 9,2010 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID 

IRS"20 1 0-00 I 0-000 I). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part ofthe new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these 

regulations. 

Liz A. Phelps
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Daniel T. Donovan, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Brady, J.
From: Gail James

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:28:44 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Gail James

7710 W. 87th St

Overland Park, KS 66212
EXHIBIT 99.2


Supplement to Registrant's Registration Statements on Form S-8

In  accordance  with  the  requirements  of  Form  S-8,  the  registrant  hereby
supplements any discussion of the  indemnification  provisions of the registrant
in all of the registrant's  registration statements previously filed on Form S-8
with the following undertaking:

Insofar as indemnification  for liabilities  arising under the Securities Act of
1933 may be permitted to  directors,  officers  and  controlling  persons of the
registrant pursuant to the foregoing  provisions,  or otherwise,  the registrant
has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities  and Exchange  Commission
such  indemnification  is against  public policy as expressed in the Act and is,
therefore,  unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against
such liabilities  (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred
or paid by a director,  officer,  or controlling person of the registrant in the
successful  defense of any  action,  suit or  proceeding)  is  asserted  by such
director,  officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being
registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter
has been  settled by  controlling  precedent,  submit to a court of  appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such  indemnification  by it is against public
policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of
such issue.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Certification of Chief Financial Officer

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Industrial Minerals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Robert Dinning, Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

November 13, 2006



/s/ Robert Dinning
-----------------------
Robert Dinning
Chief Financial Officer