alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|          
**ISSN 1542-8915**
**         Writer's Guidelines                        **

**Upcoming themes         **
**Contact the****Editor****          ****Worship****Winter-Spring        '03**         **Army        Transformation and Religious Support    ****Summer-Fall        `02**
**Subscribe        or         update        your        mailing address.****Homiletics   ****Winter-Spring        `02****Spiritual Leadership   ****Summer-Fall `00****Specialized        Ministries   ****Winter-Spring `00****Combat        Developments   ****Summer-Fall `99****Chaplain        Assistant   ****Spring `99****Leadership ****Winter      `98****Communications   ****Summer-Fall      `97****Training   ****Winter-Spring      `96** **Last revised       15 Dec 2003**
Worship |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
From: Olga Rey

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:55:03 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Olga Rey

18312 Tambor Dr

Edmond, OK 73012
From: Patricia McCairen

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 8:10:07 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Patricia McCairen

2133 Culp Court

Point Roberts, WA 98281
#### The Unexcelled Fireworks Company, Respondent, v. Richard M. Collins, Appellant.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to renew the motion in the court below.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.37

                                     [LOGO]

                                 March 1, 2004


Joe Vander Pluym



Dear Joe:

     The full year 2003 results ended with a pre-tax profit of $5,769,150. This
allows the company to pay the 25% bonus level which was the $5,500,000 pre-tax
level. Enclosed is a check representing your bonus for 2003. We are thrilled to
be able to share the success of the company's recent performance with you in
this way.

     The bonus plan for 2004 has been adjusted to reflect the goals for the
company now that we have raised additional capital and become a public entity.
Your bonus will be based on the profit after-tax using a standard corporate tax
rate.

<Table>
<S>     <C>                                                                        <C>
   5%   of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $1,066,000
  10%   of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $1,566,000
  15%   of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $2,066,000
  20%   of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $2,566,000
  25%   of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $3,066,000
33.3%   of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $3,766,000
41.7%   of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $4,666,000
  50%   of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $5,666,000
</Table>

     The bonus period will be the fiscal months of January 2004 through December
2004. You must be an active employee of Bakers Footwear Group at the time
bonuses are paid to be eligible to receive your bonus.

     We are excited about the challenges and prospects in the coming year. We
hope it's profitable for all of us and our shareholders.



                                         Sincerely,


                                         /s/ Peter Edison

                                         Peter Edison




 2815 Scott Avenue-Saint Louis, Missouri 63103-(314)621-0699-Fax (314)621-0708
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 168 (Thursday, August 31, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60220-60221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18833]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Review of K99/R00 Applications.
    Date: October 24-25, 2023.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of 
General Medical Sciences, Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive 
Bethesda, Maryland 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Tracy Koretsky, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National 
Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, MSC 6200, Room 3AN12F, 
Bethesda, Maryland

[[Page 60221]]

20892, 301-594-2886, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#186c6a797b613673776a7d6c6b736158767170367f776e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aedadccfcdd780c5c1dccbdaddc5d7eec0c7c680c9c1d8">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.859, 
Biomedical Research and Research Training, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 24, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-18833 Filed 8-30-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.34


                                     [LOGO]

                                 March 1, 2004


Michele Bergerac


Dear Michele:

     The full year 2003 results ended with a pre-tax profit of $5,769,150. This
allows the company to pay the 50% bonus level which was the $5,500,000 pre-tax
level. Enclosed is a check representing your bonus for 2003. We are thrilled to
be able to share the success of the company's recent performance with you in
this way.

     The bonus plan for 2004 has been adjusted to reflect the goals for the
company now that we have raised additional capital and become a public entity.
Your bonus will be based on the profit after-tax using a standard corporate tax
rate.

<Table>
<S><C>
10%     of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $1,066,000
20%     of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $1,566,000
30%     of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $2,066,000
40%     of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $2,566,000
50%     of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $3,066,000
71.4%   of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $3,766,000
92.7%   of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $4,666,000
114.3%  of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $5,666,000
</Table>

     The bonus period will be the fiscal months of January 2004 through December
2004. You must be an active employee of Bakers Footwear Group at the time
bonuses are paid to be eligible to receive your bonus.

     We are excited about the challenges and prospects in the coming year. We
hope it's profitable for all of us and our shareholders.


                                   Sincerely,



                                   /s/Peter Edison
                                   ----------------
                                   Peter Edison


ss




2815 SCOTT AVENUE - SAINT LOUIS, MISSOURI 63103 - (314)621-0699 -
FAX(314)621-0708
From: Kaida Lyn MacKinnon

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 7:04:05 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Kaida Lyn MacKinnon

5370 Bilberry Lane

Westerville, OH 43081
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Certification of Chief Financial Officer)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Industrial Minerals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
Dinning, Chief Financial Officer) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

August 20, 2007                 /s/   Robert Dinning
                                -----------------------
                                Robert Dining, Chief Financial Officer
From: jerry hansen

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: mandate to cover contraceptives

Date: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 5:45:16 PM

I am opposed to the mandating of insurance coverage of contraceptives that include antibortifacients

that destroy an unborn child in the womb....Ella and Plan B. Such a mandate will violate the

consciences of millions of citizens who believe that life begins at conception. Please listen to the voices

of those who care and the unheard voices of the unborn.

Diane Hansen Kennewick, WA 99336
From: Burnie Vaughn

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 6:09:48 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Burnie Vaughn
Haslet, Texas
From: Azolene Brown

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Friday, August 05, 2011 5:07:31 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Azolene Brown

P.O. Box 545

Monterey, MA 01245
#### Thomas Sawyer, an Infant, by Thomas C. Larkin, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, *v.*Dravo Contracting Company, Appellant.

*Sawyer*v. *Dravo Contracting Co.,*146 App. Div. 907, affirmed.

(Argued April 3, 1912;

decided April 30, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 17, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant, his employer.

*568
      *James F. Donnelly*and *Frederick W. Catlin*for appellant.

*Thomas J. O’Neill, L. F. Fish*and *Eugene E. McGee*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
Exhibit 11

                     COVENANT BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                       COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE

                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)

                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                              Three Months Ended                   Six Months Ended
                                                         ----------------------------       ----------------------------

                                                         June 30,          June 30,          June 30,          June 30,
                                                           1997             1996              1997               1996
                                                           ----             ----              ----               ----


<S>                                                       <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>
Net income                                                $  910            $  754            $1,814            $1,435
                                                          ======            ======            ======            ======


Average number of shares outstanding:
  Average common shares outstanding                        3,054             3,073             3,044             3,073
  Common stock equivalents considered in
  earnings per share computation:
   Dilutive stock options                                    201               106               180               107
   Conversion of preferred stock Series "A"                  550               550               550               550
   Conversion of preferred stock Series "B"                  509               509               509               509
                                                          ------            ------            ------            ------
Average number of shares outstanding                       4,314             4,238             4,283             4,239
                                                          ======            ======            ======            ======


Net income per share
  of common stock and common stock equivalents            $ 0.21            $ 0.18            $ 0.42            $ 0.34
                                                          ======            ======            ======            ======

</TABLE>
#### FRANK BLUE, PLAINTIFF-PROSECUTOR, v. JOHN L. SNITZLER, OVERSEER OF THE POOR, DEFENDANT.

Submitted May 12, 1933

Decided September 27, 1933.

Before Justices Case, Bodine and Donges.

Bor the plaintiff-prosecutor, *G. Raymond Lyons.*

Bor the defendant, *Thomas H. Eagerty.*

Per Curiam.

The writ in this case brings up for review a judgment of filiation in an action by the overseer of the poor tried in the Quarter Sessions before a jury.

The first reason for reversal relates to the action of the trial court in sustaining an objection to the following question addressed to defendant’s witness, Marie Becza: “Do you know what her [the complainant’s] reputation is for truth and veracity in the neighborhood?” It clearly appeared from the testimony that the word “neighborhood” referred to the “neighborhood” where he had resided.

It was open to the defendant to impeach, if he could, complaining witness’ testimony by showing that her reputation *814for truth and veracity was poor. 7 *Corp. Jur.*989; *State*v. Polhemus, 65 N. *J. L.*387; 47 *Atl. Rep.*470. The foundation for the question was well laid. *State*v. Baldanzo, 106 *N. J. L.*498; 148 *Atl. Rep.*725, and the exclusion of the question was reversible error, if manifest wrong and injury was done to the defendant. We do not think it can be said that the error was harmless, although the proceeding was a civil one. *Montclair*v. Eason, 92 *N. J. L.*199; 104 *Atl. Rep.*291. It was essential that the plaintiff establish the truth of the charge. The defendant was harmed when he was precluded from showing the reputation of the complainant for truth and veracity.

Even though the proceeding in the Quarter Sessions was a trial *de*novo, there was no harm in asking the defendant on cross-examination if he had denied the charge as made in the recorder’s court. It was a relevant inquiry as to his conduct on a former occasion when he had an opportunity to testify and failed so to do.

The charge of the court was not an invasion upon the rights of the jury. The comments of the court upon the testimony are within the bounds of the evidence. The issues were finally submitted to the jury in such a way that they must have realized that the facts must be found by them from the evidence, as they recalled it, before a verdict could be reached.

The judgment is reversed.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.16 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil