alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-14-00057-CR

LARRY JERMAINE WIGENTON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court 3 of Dallas County

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court No. F-1371124-J

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Larry Jermaine Wigenton has filed a motion complaining that he has no counsel in his 

pending appeal. The appeal was transferred to this Court from the Fifth Court of Appeals. 

Wigenton asks this Court to appoint counsel to represent him. He is before this Court in an 

appeal from the revocation of his community supervision and the final adjudication of guilt. 

Wigenton had appointed counsel both at the original hearing and at his adjudication hearing. 

The record sheds no light on the nature of the previous counsel’s appointment or possible 

release from her duty to represent the defendant. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 1.051

(West Supp. 2013). This Court has contacted Wigenton’s last appointed counsel, Pamela 

Segura-Muhammad of the Dallas County Public Defender’s Office, and she has informed this 

Court that her understanding is that she is no longer representing Wigenton. 

Under these circumstances, pursuant to Article 1.051(d) of the Texas Code of Criminal 

Procedure, we find it appropriate to grant Wigenton’s motion for the appointment of counsel, and 

abate this appeal to the trial court for the purpose of appointing counsel to represent Wigenton on 

appeal. 

The appointment shall be made within fifteen days of the date of this order.

A supplemental clerk’s record containing the appointment shall be filed with this Court 

no later than ten days after the appointment is made.

All appellate timetables are stayed and will resume on the filing of the supplemental 

clerk’s record containing the order of appointment.
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: June 5, 2014
Ex-10.23: Letter Agreement



 




Exhibit 10.23




Charles A. Fust

[Address Omitted]



April 12, 2003



SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc.

516 Paul Morris Drive

Englewood, Florida 34223



Re: Letters of Agreement with Moty Herman



Ladies and Gentlemen:


This letter will serve to confirm the intentions and understanding of the
undersigned, Charles A. Fust., on behalf of himself and his successors,
assigns, legatees and personal representatives (“Fust”), regarding the letter
of agreement dated October 21, 2003 between SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc. (“SFH”)
and Moty Hermon (the “October 21, 2003 Letter Agreement”), the letter of
agreement between Charles Fust and Moty Herman dated October 22, 2003 (the
“October 22, 2003 Letter Agreement”), and the supplemental letter agreement
between Charles Fust on behalf of himself and SFH, and Moty Hermon dated
October 28, 2003 (the “October 28, 2003 Letter Agreement”), the three foregoing
agreements being hereinafter referred to collectively as the “Agreements”).


It was never the intention of Fust to commit or obligate SFH, in any way, for
the performance of Moty Herman’s “put” option regarding 1,229,723 shares of
SFH Common stock or any other obligation related to the “put” option; rather,
it was Fust’s intention for this to be a transaction between Fust and Moty
Herman. As a result, all obligations resulting from the Agreements are to be
borne by Fust personally. This can be evidenced by Fust’s placing 1,229,723 of
Fust’s personally owned shares of SFH common stock in an escrow account held by
the Richard Bernstein Esq. Escrow Account for the benefit of Moty Herman’s
“put” rights. These shares will remain in the escrow account until the earlier
of Moty Herman exercising his “put” option and obtaining title to the escrowed
shares or the expiration of the term of the “put” option as stated in the
October 21, 2003 Letter Agreement.


Additionally, Fust hereby personally guarantees the satisfaction of any shares
of stock required to be issued pursuant to Mr. Herman’s “put” rights obtained
in the October 21, 2003 Letter Agreement whether they be issued from the
aforementioned escrow account or from other shares of stock personally held by
Fust or the Charles Fust Family Limited Partnership.



 






 






SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc.

April 12, 2004

Page Two


Additionally, Fust hereby waives any and all rights that Fust may have received
pursuant to the October 22, 2003 Letter Agreement as they relate to the
assignment of the right to receive Consideration Shares (as defined in the
October 22, 2003 Letter Agreement) from SFH to Fust.


Additionally, Fust agrees to indemnify and hold harmless SinoFresh HealthCare,
Inc. from any and all costs and consideration associated with: (a) any
exercises made pursuant to the “put” rights granted under the Agreements, and
(b) any other actual or implied rights inuring to the benefit of Moty Hermon
under the Agreements.


The representations and agreements of Fust in this letter shall be effective as
of the effective dates of the aforementioned Agreements.


Sincerely,


/s/ Charles A. Fust
TP 7245E

1 of 2 

AD Number: CF-2015-16R1

EMERGENCY 

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is issued pursuant to Canadian Aviation Regulation (CAR) 521.427. 

No person shall conduct a take-off or permit a take-off to be conducted in an aircraft that is in their legal 

custody and control, unless the requirements of CAR 605.84 pertaining to ADs are met. Standard 625 - 

Aircraft Equipment and Maintenance Standards Appendix H provides information concerning alternative 

means of compliance (AMOC) to ADs.

Number:

CF-2015-16R1

ATA:

64

Effective Date:

6 August 2015 

Type Certificate:

H-107

Subject: 

Tail Rotor - Pitch Link Spherical Bearing Accelerated Wear

Revision:

Supersedes AD CF-2015-16, issued on 2 July 2015. 

Applicability:

Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limited (BHTC) model 429 helicopters, serial numbers 57001 and 

subsequent. 

Compliance:

As indicated below, unless already accomplished.

Background:

In service reports showed that the tail rotor pitch link spherical bearings have experienced early and 

accelerated wear. On three occasions, bearings have been found worn beyond limits during pre-flight 

inspection, showing a radial and axial play that was easily detectable. In one case, the spherical bearing 

had separated from the tail rotor pitch link, resulting in damage to the tail rotor blade pitch horn assembly. 

In another case, the spherical bearing was inspected and found acceptable during a maintenance 

inspection which occurred 1.2 hours air time before it was found worn beyond limits during pre-flight

inspection. 

An undetected worn bearing could lead to pitch link failure, resulting in loss of controllability of the 

helicopter.

The original issue of this AD stated that it was applicable to helicopters that have accumulated 50 hours 

air time or more. There was a possibility that some operators would conclude that no action was required 

for low time helicopters. This revision of the AD includes changes to the Applicability and Corrective 

Actions to clarify that all model 429 helicopters require recurring inspection.

This AD is considered an interim action and further AD action may follow.

Corrective Actions:

1. Within 10 hours air time from the effective date of this AD, or before exceeding 60 hours air time 

since new, whichever occurs later, inspect the tail rotor pitch link spherical bearings and replace the

tail rotor pitch link assembly as applicable, in accordance with BHTC Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) 429-

15-16, dated 18 February 2015, or later revision approved by the Chief, Continuing Airworthiness, 

Transport Canada.

2. Subsequently, at intervals not exceeding 50 hours air time, repeat the actions specified in the 

Corrective Actions section, paragraph 1 of this AD.
CF-2015-16R1 2 of 2 

Authorization:

For the Minister of Transport, 

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY

Philip Tang

Acting Chief, Continuing Airworthiness 

Issued on 6 August 2015 

Contact:

Ross McGowan, Continuing Airworthiness, Ottawa, telephone 613-952-4357, facsimile 613-996-9178 or 

e-mail AD-CN@tc.gc.ca or any Transport Canada Centre.
REC- JAP 4 2 -/0 Page 1 of 1

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS
BRANCH

As of: September 03, 2010

PUBLIC status Posted

posted: September 03, 2010
SU B M ISSIO N ennneste Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0714
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Majera Majidi

Address:
Phoenix, AZ,
Organization: Phoenician Health Group
—
General Comment
Please see attached letter.
—

Attachments

IRS-2010-0010-0714.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterlnfoCoverPage?Call=P... 9/3/2010


08/12/2010

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to
Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

Dr. Majera T. Majidi
Page | of 1

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION Q(7/1_.014//9 Js
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS oL © //S4/A-1O hue
BRANCH, & 5 2019

As of: August 05, 2010

PUBLIC Status: Posted

Tracking No. 80b39e50
SUBM ISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010}

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0033
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Cynthia S Burger
Address:
Binghamton, NY,
Organization: Broome County Medicai Society

General Comment

We are an office of two employees, both full time. The availability of affordable health insurance
is an important employee benefit and retention tool. We would tike to see an exemption for small
and medium size associations to keep their "grandfathered" status for health insurance plans
until the health exchanges are operational in 2014.

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 8/5/2010
From: Tammie Tischler

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 9:33:04 AM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Tammie Tischler

2847 Craig Road

Ann Arbor, MI 48103
From: Rita Burns

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 7:29:39 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

The decision does away with the discriminatory practice of having insurance pay for Viagra but not birth

control. There is no room in American government agencies for religious policy to be made public policy.

You have saved many families needless suffering.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Rita Burns

12821 Chicken Dinner Rd

Caldwell, Id 83607
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7229
SYLVESTER LEE PANNELL, Petitioner - Appellant,
v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:06-cv-00600-sgw) Submitted: March 25, 2008 Decided: March 27, 2008 Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sylvester Lee Pannell, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Sylvester Lee Pannell seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. In civil cases in which the United States is not a party, parties have thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to file a notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). A district court may extend the time to file a notice of appeal if a party moves for an extension within thirty days after expiration of the original appeal period and the party has shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A); Washington v. Bumgarner , 882 F.2d 899, 900-01 (4th Cir. 1989). Moreover, a district court may reopen the time to file an appeal if it finds: (i) the moving party did not receive notice of the entry of judgment within twenty-one days of entry; (ii) the motion to reopen is filed within 180 days after the judgment is entered or within seven days after the movant receives notice of entry, whichever is earlier; and (iii) no party would be prejudiced. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The time period within which to file a notice of appeal is “‘mandatory and jurisdictional.’” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978). The district court’s order dismissing Pannell’s § 2254 petition was entered on April 3, 2007. Pannell therefore had until- 3 - May 3, 2007 to file his notice of appeal. Pannell’s notice of appeal was not filed until August 16, 2007. Although Pannell’s notice of appeal asks for another opportunity to appeal his case, Pannell did not timely move for an extension of time or for a reopening of the time to file a notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). Accordingly, we dismiss his appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decision process.

DISMISSED
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.42 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT’S REPORT**

 

Board of Directors 

Sistersville Bancorp, Inc.

 

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheetof Sistersville Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary as of September 30, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of cash flows for the six-month periods ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, and the consolidated statements of income and comprehensiveincome for the six-and three-month periods ended September 30, 2003 and 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. 

 

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an auditconducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such anopinion. 

 

Based on our review, we are not aware of any materialmodifications that should be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. 

 

We have previously audited, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, theconsolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report datedApril 17, 2003, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. 

 

/s/ S. R. SNODGRASS, A.C. 

 

Wheeling, WestVirginia 

November 10, 2003
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.66 MB)
 
 F-35 Aircraft Aviation F-35A F-35A Lightning II Take off Lightning Take-off
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Patricia Woods

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:57:25 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Patricia Woods

1024 Central Ave. N Apt C13

Kent, WA 98032