alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Oct. 3, 1911

#### Petition of Sullivan County Railroad.

A petition for leave to extend the tracks of a railroad, which was pending in the supreme court when chapter 164, Laws 1911, took effect, is to be heard and determined by the public service commission.

Petition, for leave to extend the tracks of the Sullivan County Railroad from Lebanon to Cornish and for that purpose to take the lands of certain objecting owners.

*Branch & Branch {Oliver E. Branch*orally), for the petitioners.

*Herbert C. Lakin*(of New York) and *Bemick & Hollis {Mr. Bemick*orally), for objecting landowners.

Young, J.

The objectors contend that chapter 164, Laws 1911, deprives the court of all further original jurisdiction of this proceeding. That act creates a public service commission to perform the duties of the board of railroad commissioners [s. 3 (a)] and those which sections 18-20, chapter 156, Public Statutes, impose on the court (s. 12). It also provides that its passage “shall not affect pending actions, . . . but all actions . . . pending *186before the supreme court ... or before the board of railroad commissioners . . . shall thereafter be acted upon and determined by the public service commission” [s. 3 (c)], abolishes the board of railroad commissioners [s. 3 (a)], and repeals sections 18-20, chapter 156, Public Statutes,' — the statutory provisions on which this proceeding rests *(s.*21).

Whether this court has further jurisdiction depends on what is intended by section 3 (c). If chapter 164 in no way affects pending actions, this court has final jurisdiction of this cause; but if that was not the legislature's intention, it must be either transferred to the public service commission or dismissed. The only evidence relevant to the issue of intention is the language the legislature used, and that provides in so many words that after the act becomes a law actions of this kind shall “be acted upon and determined” by the commission. Therefore it could not have intended the act to have no effect whatever upon them. It is more probable that section 3 (c) was intended to limit the effect of the act on-such actions. In other words, the legislature used “but,” in the second line of section 3 (c), in the sense of “except”; and that is one of its most common meanings. Webster New Int. Diet., But, 1, 2. If it was used in that sense, the act so far affects pending actions that thereafter they are to “be acted upon” by the commission. The fact that section 3 (c) is meaningless if that was not the sense in which “but” was used tends to the same conclusion; and as there is nothng in the act to rebut this presumption, it must be held that it affects pending actions to this extent, and to this extent only, that thereafter they are to be acted upon and determined by the commission.

*Motions for further proceedings in this court denied.*

All concurred.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.08 MB)
 
 48th Fighter Wing 494th Fighter Squadron RAF Lakenheath agile combat employment Souda Air Base
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1092

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt feed truck chassis

from excise tax on heavy trucks and trailers.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 22, 2001

Mr. GRAMM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt

feed truck chassis from excise tax on heavy trucks and

trailers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FOR FEED TRUCK CHASSIS FROM

4 EXCISE TAX ON HEAVY TRUCKS AND TRAIL5 ERS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4053(2) of the Internal

7 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to feed, seed, and fer8 tilizer equipment) is amended by striking subparagraph

9 (E) and inserting the following:
2

•S 1092 IS

1 ‘‘(E) for any combination of the foregoing,

2 and

3 any automobile truck chassis (so primarily designed)

4 to which such body is mounted or permanently af5 fixed.’’.

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

7 this section shall apply to sales occurring after the date

8 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.47 MB)
 
 C-IED Operation Inherent Resolve Training Iraqi Security Forces Defeat Daesh
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
IV 

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 566

Expressing the condolences of the House of Representatives on the death 

of the Honorable Patsy T. Mink, a Representative from Hawaii. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 1, 2002

Mr. ABERCROMBIE submitted the following resolution; which was considered 

and agreed to 

RESOLUTION

Expressing the condolences of the House of Representatives 

on the death of the Honorable Patsy T. Mink, a Representative from Hawaii.

1 Resolved, That the House has heard with profound 

2 sorrow of the death of the Honorable Patsy T. Mink, a 

3 Representative from the State of Hawaii. 

4 Resolved, That a committee of such Members of the 

5 House as the Speaker may designate, together with such 

6 Members of the Senate as may be joined, be appointed 

7 to attend the funeral. 

8 Resolved, That the Sergeant at Arms of the House 

9 be authorized and directed to take such steps as may be 

10 necessary for carrying out the provisions of these resolu-
2

HRES 566 ATH 

1 tions and that the necessary expenses in connection there2 with be paid out of applicable accounts of the House. 

3 Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolu4 tions to the Senate and transmit a copy thereof to the 

5 family of the deceased. 

6 Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it ad7 journ as a further mark of respect to the memory of the 

8 deceased.

Æ
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.18 MB)
 
 SME 1TSC RAO USCENTCOM USARCENT 184th SC Omani HET
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### Caroline G. Gade, Appellant, v. Frederick W. Gade, Respondent.

Judgment and order reversed, and referee’s report vacated, and case remitted to Special Term. Appellant’s *costs*of appeal to abide event. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
From: Linnea Williams

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 6:41:05 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

Thank you so much for this decision. I work for Planned Parenthood of Northern New England and see

many women to give them contraceptives and care. We are able to give the women without insurance

very good or free prices on their supplies. However the women with insurance often have a harder time

affording their supplies. Some of them have as much as $60/month copays for their specific methods. It

is difficult to see these women who figured they were covered struggle to pay their copays. Some

actually don't bill their insurance because using our sliding fee scale is so much cheaper. If they have a

high copay and the sliding scale price is cheaper then we do knock down the price but if they don't fall

on our scale then they still struggle. This new rule is not only helpful but makes so much sense I can't

believe it took this long. I have never understood since the insurance companies are all about making

and saving money why they wouldn't pay for birth control considering it

is cheaper for them to pay for me to have contraceptives rather than pay for me to have a baby and

that baby's continuing care. This is great news and I commend you for this decision.

Sincerely,

Linnea Williams

6D Hillside Lane

Westford, vt 05494
EXHIBIT 21



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|                             |  |                                                                                    
|---------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Spire Biomedical, Inc.       |  | Incorporated on 25 October 2000 Under the laws of the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
|                             | 
|Spire Solar, Inc.            |  | Incorporated on 5 December 2002 Under the laws of the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
|                             | 
|Spire Florida, Inc.          |  | Incorporated on 31 July 2003 Under the laws of the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts   
|                             | 
|Bandwidth Semiconductor, LLC |  | Formed on December 21, 1999 Under the laws of the
State of Delaware
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.84 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7357

DANNY LEE JOYNER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD ANGELONE, Director of Department of

Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge.

(CA-00-1242-AM)

Submitted: January 18, 2001 Decided: January 25, 2001

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Danny Lee Joyner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Danny Lee Joyner seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Joyner v. Angelone, No. CA-00-

1242-AM (E.D. Va. Aug. 21, 2000). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
gpenerensimes 3501/84/21)

Page 1 of 2

JUN 2 2 2019

As of: June 22, 2010
PUBLIC Status: Posted
Posted: June 22, 2010
SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0003
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Barbara A Jones
Address:
Henderson, KY, 42420

General Comment

As an Insurance Agent who has been selling and servicing Individuals and Small Groups for over
25 years I am astounded by the Grandfather Rule. This needs to be completely done away with.
Nobody's plan can stay Grandfathered. So making the comment “If you like your plan you can
keep it" is unbelieveable. Most of my clients are seeing anywhere from 28% to 45% rate
increases now. How can they keep paying their same plan and Premium for the next 3 years?
How can you compare your plan now to what is coming in 2014? There is no way to compare.
You have to deal with your plan today and the premium you are paying today!

Until the Regs are written on what the plans are going to look like in 2014 you cannot compare
your plan you have in 2010. By not allowing to raise deductibles or outpockets or contribution
you are making employers and Individuals change their plan so they will not be grandfathered.
When someone self employed is facing a 38% increase on thier $2500 Deductible HSA Plan the
only way to get that down is going to the next avaible plan which is a $5000 Deductible. This is
the reatity in the reat world, You should talke to some of my clients that are paying this and then
talk to them about this "Grandfathered" Keep if you like it"

While you are writing the regs for this how about getting some good input from some real people
instead of Govenment Regulators.

I for one am a Democrate and I also supported passage of this bill. I was in the minority of my
profession. But use your heads a little when addressing the Regulations

thanks

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 6/22/2010


Page 2 of 2

Barbara A. Jones

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=..._ 6/22/2010
#### Augustus H. Adams, Respondent, v. William P. Mitchell, Appellant.

— Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Phillip Merrick, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
of webMethods, Inc. (the Company), has executed this certification in
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002
(the Report). The undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                      |  |                                                                                       
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 13, 2002 |  | /S/ PHILLIP MERRICKName: Phillip Merrick
Title:   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Merrimack,

June, 1895.

#### Ætna Mutual Life Insurance Co. *v.*Clough *& a.*

Under a policy of life insurance payable to the wife of the assured, or, if she dies first", to “ their children,” a child by his subsequent marriage takes nothing.

Bill or Interpleader. March 1, 1869, George Clough took out a policy of insurance in the plaintiff company for $15,000, which was made payable to his wife Eliza R.; and “ in case of the death of the said Eliza R. Clough before the decease of said George Clough, the amount of said insurance shall be payable’ to their children for their use, or to their guardian if under age.” Previous to their marriage neither of them had children. At the date of the policy they had two sons, George P. and Charles P., two of the defendants. Eliza died March 26, 1874. April 15, 1880, George married Laura A. Clough, by whom he had a son Henry B., who was born September 10, 1884. George died January 2, 1895. Laura A., as the guardian of Henry B., is the other defendant, and claims in behalf of her ward one third of the insurance money, while George P. and Charles P. claim the whole of it. The court sustained the latter claim, and the guardian excepted.

*William II. Sawyer*and *Streeter Sp Walker,*for Laura A. Clough, guardian.

*dibin & Martin*and *DeWitt G. Howe,*for George P. and Charles P. Clough.

*Plaintiffs, pro se.*

*Per Curiam.****

The title to the fund in question depends upon the construction of the contract contained in the policy. The natural meaning of the language used is not obscure or doubtful, and there is no evidence that the parties did not intend by the expression-, “ their children,” the children of George and Eliza. *Connecticut M. L. Ins. Co.*v. *Fish,*59 N. H. 126, *127; Lockwood*v. Bishop, 51 How. Pr. 221. The assured’s second marriage and the birth of another son had no effect upon the contract of insurance, and did not modify its meaning. The rights of the beneficiaries vested at the date of the policy, and could not be changed to their prejudice by any subsequent act of the assured, *299without their consent. *Stokell*v. *Kimball,*59 N. H. 13; *City Savings Bank*v. *Whittle,*63 N. H. 587.

*(Exception overruled.*

Blodgett, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

*

 See foot-note on page 22.