alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.3


 


THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Third Amendment to Employment Agreement
(“Third Amendment”), effective as of April 14, 2016 (the “Effective Date”) is entered into by and between
ArQule, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) with its principal offices at One Wall Street, Burlington, Massachusetts
01803, and Brian Schwartz (“Executive”). The purpose of this Third Amendment is to amend the employment agreement dated
as of June 17, 2008 between the Company and Executive, as previously amended by an agreement effective as of February 23, 2012
(the “First Amendment”) and as further amended by an agreement effective as of March 8, 2013 (the “Second Amendment”);
the employment agreement as so amended is hereinafter referred to as the “Employment Agreement”). Capitalized terms
used but not defined in this Third Amendment shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement.


 


In consideration of the mutual covenants
and agreements contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt, adequacy and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the Company and Executive (collectively, the “Parties”) hereby agree as follows:


 


		1	Term of Employment. Section 1 of the Employment Agreement, as amended, is hereby amended and replaced in its entirety
with the following:



 


“The Company hereby agrees to continue to employ
Executive, and Executive hereby accepts such continued employment with the Company, upon the terms and subject to the conditions
set forth in the Employment Agreement. The Parties agree that the employment term shall continue through December 31, 2018, unless
earlier terminated in accordance with the provisions of Section 5 of the Employment Agreement (the “Employment Term”).”


 


		2	Entire Understanding. This Third Amendment constitutes the entire understanding and agreement between the Parties regarding
the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements, written or oral, with respect to the subject matter hereof, except
that, other than as explicitly modified by the terms of this Third Amendment, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect in accordance with its provisions. This Third Amendment shall be incorporated into the Employment Agreement as an additional
provision thereto.



 


		3	Governing Law. This Third Amendment shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the law (other
than the law governing conflict of law questions) of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.



 


[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK]


 




     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Parties have executed or caused to be executed this Amendment as of the date set forth above.


 


	ARQULE, INC.	 	EXECUTIVE
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Paolo Pucci	 	By:	/s/ Brian Schwartz
	Name: Paolo Pucci	 	Name:  Brian Schwartz
	Title: Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF A PPEAL S EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS AUTOF L EX L EASI

NG, Appellant,
v. MI CHAEL

I RVI N, Appellee
. § § § § § § No. 08-08-00030- CV

Appea l from the 44th District Court of Da llas County , Texas (TC# 04-00366-B )
MEMORAN DUM OP INION Pending befor e the Court is Appellant’s motion to dismiss the appea l pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedur e 42.1. Appellant reque sts that the appea l be dismiss ed without prejudice
. The applicable rule does not pr ovide for a dismiss al without pr ejudice. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 42.1( a)( 1); Simpson v. City of

San Antonio , No. 08-10-00229- CV, 2010 WL 3708850, at *1 (Tex.App.--El Paso Sept. 22, 2010, no pet. h.) (mem. op.). Acc ording ly , the reque st that the appea l be dismiss ed without prejudice is denied. I n all other respe cts, the motion is g rante d, and this appea l is dismiss ed. Costs
are assessed a g ainst Appellant. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 42.1(d).

GUADA L UPE RI VERA, J ustice November

10, 2010 Be fore Chew, C.J ., McClure, a nd Rivera, JJ
.
From: Theresa Devlin

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Friday, August 05, 2011 12:29:49 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Theresa Devlin

731 Swan Cove Lane

Pasadena, MD 21122
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION 
EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR 
ENDED MARCH 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       3,290,176
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     38,637
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,413,866
<PP&E>                                         789,827
<DEPRECIATION>                               (553,006)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,590,687
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          866,562
<BONDS>                                         22,584
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,002,288
<COMMON>                                       215,545
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,483,708
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,590,687
<SALES>                                         69,510
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               348,460
<CGS>                                          140,460
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,579,463
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,371,463)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,371,463)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                    7,226,887<F1>
<NET-INCOME>                              (11,598,350)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.25)
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
---

---

Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Forms S-8, (File No.
333-61895, File No. 333-55970) and Forms S-3, ( File No. 333-140968 , File No. 333-140969
and , File No. 333-140974) of Ampal  American Israel Corporation of our report dated
March 30, 2007 relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/S/ Kesselman & Kesselman
A member of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited

Tel-Aviv, Israel
March 30, 2007



---

---
From: Andy Thrall [mailto:athrall@att.net] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 10:23 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

Government confiscation of my retirement funds, no matter how cleverly disguised and/or

worded, will not be tolerated.

Andy Thrall

6521 Westwood Dr.

Amarillo, TX  79124
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 27, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 59768]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24803]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6808]

Advisory Committee on International Postal and Delivery Services

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice; advisory committee meeting cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State gives notice of cancellation of the 
meeting of the Advisory Committee on International Postal and Delivery 
Services scheduled for September 29, 2011, and announced in the Federal 
Register on Friday, September 2, 2011. The meeting will be rescheduled 
for a date to be announced in the future.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laree Martin, Office of Global Systems 
(IO/GS), Bureau of International Organization Affairs, U.S. Department 
of State, at (202) 647-1526, Martinl@state.gov.

    Dated: September 15, 2011.
Nerissa J. Cook,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of International Organization 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-24803 Filed 9-26-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-19-P
```
# EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERAND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the filing of the Annual Report of FCCC, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Bernard Zimmerman, Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|1. |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of
Registrant.
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | 
| |  | 
| |  | 

| | Name: Bernard Zimmerman                                                                                                                      
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Title: President, Chief Executive Officer          
                                                              and Chief Financial Officer

Dated:   June 17, 2009

---
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-79,513-01

EX P ARTE RICARDO M ORENO RAMIREZ , JR., Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. CR-2944- 12-A IN THE 92ND DISTRICT COURT

F ROM HIDALG O COUNTY

Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Te x . C ri m . App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of ag g ravated robber y and sente nced to ten y ear s’ imprisonment. He did not appea l his conviction. Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary beca use althoug h he pleade d guilty afte r having been told that he would be rele ased on shock probation, he is not elig ible for shock probation. The trial court made finding s of fac t and conclusions of law and rec ommended that we g rant relief

. Rel i ef is g rante d. The judgme nt in cause number CR-2944-12-A in the 92nd District Court of Hidalg o County is set aside, and Applica n t i s rema nded to the custody of the Sheriff of Hidalg o2

County to answe r the char g es as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any nece ssary bench w arr ant within 10 day s after the mandate of this Court issues. Copies of this opinion shall be s e n t to th e T e xa s D e p a r tm e nt of Criminal J ustice–Corre ctional I nstitut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: May

22, 2013 Do not publish
From: Marilyn Riley

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 4:43:38 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

Without a doubt, this policy will save women's lives and help families to be healthy and successful.

Thank you for supporting women's reproductive freedom.

Sincerely,

Marilyn Riley

912 Newport Street

Oceanside, CA 92057
CTF 52 conducts mine countermeasure exercise with NATO
 By None  , US Naval Forces Central Command
  CENTCOM
 MANAMA, Bahrain (March 29, 2011) — Commander, Task Force 52 ships participated in a mine countermeasures exercise with Standing NATO Mine Countermeasures Group(SNMCMG) 2 and French Forces in the Arabian Gulf last week. Mine countermeasures ships USS Ardent (MCM 12) and USS Scout (MCM 8), Royal Navy’s Fleet auxiliary landing dock ship RFA Lyme Bay and mine countermeasures ships HMS Pembroke and HMS Middleton, all assigned to CTF 52, participated alongside French Ships Croix de Sud and Var as well as the ships of SNMCMG 2, Greek frigate HS Spetsai, and minehunters FGS Herten (Germany), HS Kallisto(Greece) ITS Viareggio (Italy) and ESPS Tajo (Spain). The five-day long exercise began March 20 and gave all forces an opportunity to increase tactical and technical proficiency in a variety of disciplines and emphasized operating as part of a multi-national effort. In addition to mine detection and neutralization events, the ships conducted gunnery exercises, a group formation photo exercise, underway replenishments and operations with helicopters from Spetsai and Helicopter Mine Countermeasures Squadron (HM) 15 Det 2, assigned to CTF 52. LCDR Curtis Sparling, Scout’s commanding officer said, “The NATO PASSEX [passing exercise] provided great opportunities to not only practice our core mine warfare competencies, but to do so with our NATO partners. Together, we were able to become a better prepared, more unified force.” At the conclusion of the event, a reception was held aboard Greek frigate HS Spetsai, serving as the flagship for SNMCMG 2. It provided a chance for the crews to meet one another in person. U.S. Fifth Fleet Commander, VADM Mark Fox attended the event. “We have a unique set of challenges in this region,” Fox said. “We rely on cooperation and partnerships with other coalitions and independent navies to help achieve our goals of maritime stability and security throughout the region.” CTF 52 is the mine countermeasures force of the Coalition Forces Maritime Component Command overseen by the U.S. 5th Fleet. It operates regularly to ensure free and unfettered use of the sea lanes in the central Arabian Gulf, one of the world’s critical stretches of sea for international commerce.
----

----

III Informações

Conselho

----

AVISO DE ABERTURA DE VAGA

(Ref. A/013)

ADMINISTRADOR

(2004/C 153 A/01)

O Secretariado-Geral do Conselho da União Europeia pretende prover no quadro da PECSD (Política Europeia Comum de Segurança e Defesa) uma vaga de administrador de categoria A, grau 9 (A*9), na Direcção-Geral E — Relações Externas — Direcção VIII, encarregada das questões de defesa.

Poderão ser obtidas mais informações (nas línguas inglesa e francesa) e formulários de candidatura junto do Serviço de Selecção e Recrutamento, através do seu endereço electrónico

service.recrutement@consilium.eu.int, ou do seu sítio na internet http://ue.eu.int/concours

Prazo para a apresentação de candidaturas: 9 de Julho de 2004, fazendo fé a data do carimbo dos correios.

----
#### Baldwin *v.*Lowe.

Submitted June 28,

Decided December 21, 1907.

Complaint, from Chattahoochee superior court. Practice in the Supreme Court.

*H. C. Cameron*and *H. V.*Hargett, for plaintiff in error. '

Lumpkin, J.

1. Save as to cases specially provided for by law (such as exception to the grant or refusal of an injunction, or the appointment of or refusal to appoint a receiver), no case can be brought to this court by bill of exceptions, so long as the same is pending in the court below, unless the decision complained of would have been a final disposition of the case, had it been rendered as the excepting party claims that it should have been. Civil Code, §5526.

2. Striking an imperfect plea to the jurisdiction filed by the sole defendant, and rejecting an amendment thereto, is not a ñnal judgment, and does not dispose of the case; nor would it have done so had the amendment, been allowed and the motion to strike been overruled.

3. Where exception was taken to such a ruling, and it appears from the bill of exceptions that, after the plea to the jurisdiction had been stricken, the case was continued in order to allow the decision to be brought to this court for review, this was an interlocutory ruling, leaving the ease still pending; and the writ of error will be dismissed.

L Parties can not confer jurisdiction on this court by agreement to review such an interlocutory ruling, while the case remains pending in the trial court. Nor does it matter that the bill of exceptions recites that it was “conceded” by counsel that, under the facts of the ease, if the plea to the jurisdiction should be allowed, it would be a final disposition of the case. Such would not have been the legal result.

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Holden, J., who did not preside.*
From: Peggy Collins

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 10:52:56 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Peggy Collins

35 Ten Broeck St

Albany, NY 12210
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 23, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  DEC-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-23-1998
<CASH>                                           2,417  
<SECURITIES>                                         0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0  
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0  
<INVENTORY>                                      1,033  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,070  
<PP&E>                                          34,684  
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,703  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,296  
<BONDS>                                              0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0  
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                           104  
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,348  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,452  
<SALES>                                         14,384  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,384  
<CGS>                                            3,959  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,905  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   950  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 230  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,339  
<INCOME-TAX>                                       495  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                844  
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                       (1,127)
<NET-INCOME>                                      (284)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.03)
                                               

</TABLE>
#### William F. Bonynge, Appellant, v. Emily M. Richards and others, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Brady. J.