alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Initial Review Group; Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Biology Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         October 27, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 6710B Rockledge Drive, Room 2131B, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Luis E. Dettin, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6710B Rockledge Drive, Room 2131B, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-8231,                         *luis.dettin@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 30, 2023.

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis, 

Program Analyst,  Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-19155 Filed 9-5-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.1
   1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CCFNB Bancorp, Inc.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a
  15 (f) and 15d  15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and,
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: March 8, 2011
    /s/ Lance O. DiehlLance O. DiehlPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) 73
From: L. Zeveloff

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 4:41:38 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

L. Zeveloff

2870 Wheelock Ave

Ogden, UT 84403
#### McCall *v.*Lewis.

Beck, J.

At the trial of this ease in the court below, the same being the trial of an issue arising upon the interposition of a claim by Lewis to the levy of a fi. fa. in favor of Bentley, administrator, for use, against Walker, defendant in fi. fa., McCall filed a petition setting up that he was the purchaser and owner of said fi. fa., and praying to be made a party plaintiff in said case; whereupon an order was granted making McCall a party plaintiff. Twenty minutes later the claimant’s attorney moved to dismiss the levy, on the ground that issue had not been tendered within five minutes after the announcement of ready by both sides. The court sustained the motion and dismissed the levy. It appears that within five minutes after the announcement of ready, McCall wrote upon the back of his said petition, in which he had prayed to be made a party to the case, the following traverse of claimant’s affidavit: “And now comes the plaintiff and joins issue, and says that the property is subject to said fi. fa.” No traverse appears on the claim papers, and the plaintiff did not call the attention of the court nor that of claimant’s attorney to the foregoing traverse until twenty minutes after the announcement of ready by both sides, and it does not appear that the attorney for claimant had done anything that could be construed as a waiver of the tender of issue being made at the proper time and in the regular manner. *Meld,*that the writing of said traverse upon the back of said petition, no attention having been called thereto, was not a sub*614stantial compliance with Ciyil Code, §5646, and the court did not err in dismissing the levy, in the exercise of a sound discretion.

Submitted October 14,

Decided November 18, 1907.

Claim. Before Judge Mitchell. Brooks superior court. May 8, 1907.

*W. C. McCall*and *J. D. Wade Jr.,*for plaintiff.

*Stanley S.*Bennei, contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.18 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### Joseph Esmond, *Z.*Titus Esmond, Appellants, v. Moses L. Abbott, Respondent.

Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals or reargument denied, with ten dollars costs.
August 16,2010 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 


:q,.~partment of Health and Human Services 


Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 


:P.O. Box 8016 


Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 


Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

- Below are my comments regarding the Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health 

Insurance Coverage Relating to Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient 

~P(otecliortand i'\."ffoI'dableCareAcf(PPACA). - "" - - - ---­

I believe that every effort should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by 


PPACA, especially as of January 1,2014 when most of the reform components (Insurance­


Exchanges, Subsidies~ Tax Credits, etc.) come into play. 


The average consumer has a broad definition of "benefits." Consumers view their health plan 

• beyond the covered benefits, cost sharing, and the contribution levels associated with the plan . 

•,It is my opinion that the Rule may still result in some confusion to the marketplace in its 

a1}plication. For example, if an employer raised the copayment level beyond the maximum in one 

area (i.e. outpatient services) but retained the copayment level for primary care doctor visits, 

does that mean a loss of grandfather status? Clarity will be critical both for the employer and the 

employee. 

Even by the most optimistic estimates, a substantial portion ofthe employee population will 

remain outside the PP ACA as of January 2014 based on the current rules. While I understand the 

difficulty involved in making change, creating another large sub-population of excluded 

individuals will only add to costs, increase confusion, and mitigate the potential impact ofthe 

legislation. 

The ~le -needstobecfear,7easOnable,~d wfth '~~~bi~fti~i~~olvedi; dete~ining~hether 

a group health plan is "in or out." The decisions the federal government makes today will 

determine the outcomes for tomorrow. We may need to make some difficult decisions to create 

a sustainable health care system that will support a growing economy in the future. That means 

getting as many citizens across the coUntry participating at the beginning to make it work and 

delivering on its promises to retain their support. 

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this regulation. 

P~L~~~C. ;PRL/ep
Exhibit 99.1

     Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
                   FirstBank NW Corp. Pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and in connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB, that:

     o    The report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and


     o    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the company's financial condition and results of
          operations.






/s/ Clyde E. Conklin
--------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Larry K. Moxley
--------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer



Dated:  November  14, 2002

                                                                              21
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

                                Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Senesco Technologies, Inc.for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned, Bruce C. Galton,President and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that:

 

                                (1)           The Quarterly Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

                                (2)           The information contained in theQuarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Senesco Technologies, Inc.

 
| Dated: February 14, 2008 |   | /s/ Bruce C. Galton*                  |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   | Bruce C. Galton                       |
|                          |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                          |   | (principal executive officer)         |

----

*  A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to usand will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Dec. 31: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL in Syria and Iraq
 By CJTF - Operation Inherent Resolve News Release
  December 31, 2014 Release # 2014131
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **SOUTHWEST ASIA -** U.S. and partner nation military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria, Dec. 31, using fighter and bomber aircraft to conduct seven airstrikes. Separately, U.S. and partner nation military forces conducted three airstrikes in Iraq, Dec. 31, using fighter and remotely piloted aircraft against the ISIL terrorists. The following is a summary of the strikes conducted since the last press release: **Syria**
* Near Al Hasakah, two airstrikes destroyed four oil derricks.
* Near Kobani, five airstrikes destroyed five ISIL buildings and six ISIL fighting positions. **Iraq**
* Near Fallujah, two airstrikes struck two ISIL tactical units.
* Near Mosul, one airstrike struck one ISIL fighting position, destroyed two ISIL fighting positions, and struck one ISIL tactical unit. Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, the region and the wider international community. The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations conducting airstrikes in Iraq include the U.S., Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Coalition nations conducting airstrikes in Syria include the U.S., Bahrain, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.08 MB)
 
 F-35; Lightning II; 4th Expeditionary Squadron; 380th Lightning
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### Timothy O’Herlihy, Respondent, *v.*Adrian H. Joline et al., as Receivers of the New York City Railway Company, Appellants.

*O'Herlihy*v. *Joline,*140 App. Div. 909, reversed.

(Argued March 6, 1912;

decided April 2, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, *549entered November 3, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendants, his employers.

*Bayard H. Ames*and *John Montgomery*for appellants.

*Thomas J. O’Neill*and *William Godnick*for respondent.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Collin, JJ.; Hiscook and Chase, JJ., dissent, on the ground that while plaintiff’s counsel was guilty of misconduct on the trial, which would have justified the Appellate Division in reversing the judgment, they doubt that any error of law was presented which gives this court jurisdiction to reverse.
----------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of 1

'!<EG-- JI~L/I:l -/0 

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 

PUBLICATION &: REGULATIONS 

BRANCH As of: August 25, 2010 

Received: August 10, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 25, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2d204 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-001O 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-001O-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-201O-0010-0382 


Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 


Submitter Information 

Name: Robert H Davis 


Address: 


209 W. Orchard Ave. 

Lebanon, OH, 45036 


Email: Chiro@your-net.com 


Phone: 513-932-3009 


-------------------------------------------------------------1--­

General Comment 

See attached file(s) 

-------------------------------------------------------------1--­

Attachments 

IRS-2010-0010-0382.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

https:/Ifdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency IcomponentisubmitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/25/2010 
8-10-2010 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCII0-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-2010­

0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effOtt 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PP ACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these 

regulations. 

Robert H. Davis 

209 W. Orchard Ave. 

Lebanon, OH 45036