alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

                                Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Senesco Technologies, Inc.for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned, Joel Brooks, ChiefFinancial Officer and Treasurer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that:

 

                                (1)           The Quarterly Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

                                (2)           The information contained in theQuarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Senesco Technologies, Inc.

 
| Dated: February 14, 2008 |   | /s/ Joel Brooks*                             |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   | Joel Brooks                                  |
|                          |   | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer        |
|                          |   | (principal financial and accounting officer) |

----

*  A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to usand will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 76 Agreed to House (ATH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 76

 Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2001

Mr. Linder submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, 
elected to the following standing committee of the House of 
Representatives:
    Committee on Standards of Official Conduct: Mr. Portman, Mr. 
Hastings of Washington, Mr. Hutchinson, and Mrs. Biggert.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


                          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8, No. 33-48370) pertaining to the Shelby Williams Industries, Inc.
1992 Key Employees' Incentive Stock Option Plan and the related Prospectus
and Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-59705) pertaining to the Shelby
Williams Industries, Inc. Directors' Stock Option Plan and the related
Prospectus of our report dated January 29, 1998, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Shelby Williams Industries, Inc.
incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1998.




                                Ernst & Young LLP





Atlanta, Georgia
March 24, 1999
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 528 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 18, 2002.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 1701) to amend the Consumer Credit Protection Act to assure 
meaningful disclosures of the terms of rental-purchase agreements, including 
disclosures of all costs to consumers under such agreements, to provide certain 
substantive rights to consumers under such agreements, and for other purposes. 
The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be 
confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour, with 50 minutes equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Financial Services and 10 minutes equally divided and controlled by 
the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary. 
After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-
minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the 
purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a 
substitute recommended by the Committee on Financial Services, as amended by the 
amendment recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary, now printed in the 
bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered 
as read. No amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute 
shall be in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 
accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the 
order printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the 
report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified 
in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, 
shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for 
division of the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All 
points of order against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 
bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may 
demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of 
the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a 
substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 
amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion 
to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                       [Letterhead of Fahn Kanne & Co.]

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As the independent certified public accountants of Ampal Industries (Israel)
Ltd. as of December 31, 1999, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report included in FORM 10-K into the Company's previously filed Registration
Statement File No. 333-61895 and No. 333-55970.


                                                    /s/ Fahn Kanne & Co.
                                                      Fahn Kanne & Co.
                                             Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)

Tel-Aviv, Israel
March 26, 2001
rr.'RTMEMTOF 

.-.MSPOHlATiOM 

rKETOPERATiOi'S 

•EP " 1 A ^1: 2 0 

SERVED SEPTEMBER 6, 2011 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SKYWEST AIRLINES 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2011-0485 

AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER 

Paragraph #2 of the Procedural Order is amended as follows : 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the 

following procedural schedule: 

... On or before November 4,2011, the parties shall conclude all discovery 

including, but not limited to^ depositions, document production, responses to production 

requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve a discovery dispute they 

shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely manner... 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
W^ 

::di 

-3d 

i5-iIs«>dtel|||^iation Administration . i,. 

!^lci||pidence Avenue, S.W. 

^t|l£i|^^^DC 20591 

i^tteajiijl^ Hearing Docket Cte 

Wilbur Wright Built 

I Todd C. Enaerson, Re^wnd^'^J 

I I]HffeQti»h6dventment and I^ a 

I S]byl!<^i||rlines 

I 444 Se^iiitiver Road 

I St. <3«^fe4JT 84790 

I lEL: 43i5^4-3530 

^ FAX: 435^34-3505 

•..•.v. 

Jel .%..; 

N(M^PM|ip!oui^ ^*^ 

Fe(Ml^!^^|Btioh Administration' 

1601 I^#vemie , S.W. 

RentWQ^^^ 98057 

Tm.: "42i-227-2161 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

^•fv^;i 

^ i -

•m 

'€.'i 

TheH«nGp|l)le Richard C. Goodv«m 

U.$li^||»Mnt.o|T:iaii§port|toi ^ ^ 

1200lli^b-8ey Aveftue, S.E. ''' ^ .^ 

Waslaiipf* DC 20590 r^'*' 

TEL: 131^66-2139 Attomey-AdMiCwJ 

|ii366>5121 Legal Assisyi^' 

FAX: i#366-7536 i^ 

was by U.S. Mail Fix i 

600] 

;: Hearing Oocket 4 

v^ 

yi
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1298.html[7/22/2015 10:02:48 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jve-jmli

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1298

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: louann stureman

General Comment

DO NOT TAX my savings or my 401k ! For years we have been warned to provide for our own retirement , now

 that I have done so you want to take that too I am absolutely AGAINST the federal government taking hold of

 my retirement assests and taxing my savings accounts.
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 This Second Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and entered into effective as of February 1, 2004, by and between PriceSmart, Inc., a
Delaware Corporation (“Employer”) and William Naylon (“Executive”). 
  
 Recitals 
  

	A)	On January 16, 2002 an Employment Agreement was made and entered into by and between Employer and Executive. 

  

	B)	On January 22, 2003, a First Amendment to Employment Agreement was made and entered into by and between Employer and Executive; 

  

	C)	Employer and Executive now desire to further amend the Employment Agreement, as set forth hereinbelow: 

  
 Agreement 
  

	1.	Section 2.1 of the Agreement which provides: 

  
 2.1 Salary. For Executive’s services hereunder, Employer shall pay as base salary to Executive the amount of $250,000 during each year of the
Employment Term. Said salary shall be payable in equal installments in conformity with Employer’s normal payroll period. Executive shall receive such salary increases, if any, as Employer, in its sole discretion, shall determine. 
  
 is hereby amended, effective February 1, 2004, to provide as follows: 
  
 1.1 Salary. For Executive’s services hereunder, Employer shall
pay as base salary to Executive the amount of $225,000 during each year of the Employment Term. Said salary shall be payable in equal installments in conformity with Employer’s normal payroll period. Executive shall receive such salary
increases, if any, as Employer, in its sole discretion, shall determine. 
  










	2.	All other terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain unaltered and fully effective. 

  
 Executed in San Diego, California, as of the date first written above. 
  

									
	 EXECUTIVE
	 	 	 	EMPLOYER
			
	 	 	 	 	 PRICESMART, INC.

				
	 William Naylon
	 	 	 	By:	 	 /s/ ROBERT M. GANS

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	 /s/ WILLIAM NAYLON
	 	 	 	 Name:
	 	 Robert M. Gans

	
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 Its:
	 	 Executive Vice President
#### Edward P. Alexander, Respondent, v. Henry R. Osborn, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. Opinion by

Boardman, J.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robert J. Landis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this transition report on Form 10-K of Comprehensive Care Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this transition report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this transition report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this transition report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
transition report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this transition report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|               |  |                                                
|-------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|               |  | /s/ ROBERT J. LANDIS                           
|August 6, 2007 |  | Robert J. Landis                               
|               |  | Chairman, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|               |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Gevity HR, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Erik Vonk, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Peter C. Grabowski, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Act”), that: 

 
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 32.2

                      TOTAL ENTERTAINMENT RESTAURANT CORP.
                        REPORT ON FORM 10Q MARCH 23, 2003

                  CERTIFICATION BY JAMES K. ZIELKE PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned, Chief Financial Officer of Total Entertainment Restaurant
Corp. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to the best of my knowledge, that the
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 23, 2003 (the "Periodic
Report") accompanying this certification fully complies with the requirements of
the Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


Date   May 6, 2004                     /s/ JAMES K. ZIELKE
      -------------                    -----------------------------------------
                                       James K. Zielke
                                       Chief Financial Officer,
                                       Secretary and Treasurer

                                      -15-
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC

SAFETY,

 Appellant,

v.

MERARDO BONILLA,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-13-00117-CV

Appeal from

41st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2011-DCV-10226b)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee 

recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, see TEX.R.APP.P. 43.5, on the judgment and all 

costs, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 30TH DAY OF MAY, 2014.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice 

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
#### Lorin Pullman, Appellant, v. Wealthy Dorn, Respondent.

Judgment of the County Court of Herkimer county affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of the county judge.
Page | of 1
ope § Hit KEG WFY1a-16 °

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS
BRANCH

As of; September 09, 2010

Pp U B LIC Received: September 03, 2010

Posted: September 09, 2010
SUBMISSION Comments Due: September 15, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0002
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Status as Grandfathered Health Plan under
the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Cross-Reference

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0951
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14487

Submitter Information

Name: Mark Christopher Nixon
Address:

Jacksonville, FL, 32216
Submitter's Representative: Mark Nixon
Organization: AGIS
Government Agency Type: Federal
Government Agency: ACF

General Comment

Can you provide guidance on employer contributions to a heaith reimbursement arrangement
(HRA) sponsored by employers? Does a change in the employer HRA contribution affect
grandfathered status? Also, how about changes to employer contributions to health savings
accounts (HSAs)?

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 9/9/2010
U.S., International Forces Seize Illegal Drugs in Gulf of Oman
 
  By U.S. Naval Forces Central Command Public Affairs
  A U.S. Coast Guard vessel seized illegal drugs worth a total estimated U.S. street value of $33 million from a fishing vessel transiting international waters in the Gulf of Oman, Jan. 30. U.S. Coast Guard cutter USCGC Emlen Tunnell (WPC 1145) was patrolling regional waters in support of Combined Task Force (CTF) 150 when it seized 4,000 kilograms of hashish and 512 kilograms of methamphetamine from the smuggling vessel. Currently led by the United Kingdom Royal Navy, CTF 150 is one of four task forces organized under the Combined Maritime Forces (CMF). This was the first drug seizure in 2023 for CMF. “This is just the beginning of our work in delivering maritime security operations in the region to stop illicit activities and drug smuggling,” said UK Royal Navy Capt. James Byron, the CTF 150 commander. “This comes as a result of a valued partnership between CTF 150 and all partner nations in Combined Maritime Forces.” Byron assumed command of the multinational task force Jan. 18 after Royal Saudi Navy Rear Adm. Abdullah Al-Mutairi led the unit for six months. Under Al-Mutairi’s leadership, CTF 150 ships logged more than 10,000 hours on regional patrols and intercepted six shipments of illegal drugs that included opium, heroin, hashish and amphetamines. The combined estimated value of the seized drugs totaled more than $250 million. Since 2021, CMF has interdicted $1 billion worth of illicit narcotics during maritime patrols. CMF is the largest international naval partnership in the world consisting of 38 member-nations and partners.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Ramesh Kapur, dba AIC Management Company v. Winfield II 

Owners Association Inc., Randall Management Inc., and Casey 

Lambright

Appellate case number: 01-16-00019-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-45991

Trial court: 270th District Court of Harris County

We dismissed this appeal by memorandum opinion issued on June 9, 2016, because 

appellants had failed to make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record and had not responded 

to our notice. On June 15, 2016, appellants filed a motion for rehearing, stating that they had 

now paid for the clerk’s record and asked that we reinstate the appeal. On June 16, 2016, the 

clerk’s record was filed. We requested a response to appellants’ motion for rehearing and 

appellees have filed a response, noting their opposition. 

We grant the motion for rehearing, withdraw our opinion and judgment of June 9, 2016, 

and reinstate this appeal on the active docket. Appellants’ brief is due within 30 days of the date 

of this order. The brief shall comply with Rule 38.1, including citations to the record and to 

authority. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1. No further extensions will be granted absent exceptional 

circumstances.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually 

Date: June 30, 2016