alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (5.24 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Marinshaw, Richard

To: Emma Cheuse (echeuse@earthjustice.org)

Cc: Phil Mulrine (Mulrine.Phil@epamail.epa.gov); Hancy, Cindy Wang

Subject: Cr Electroplating Request

Date: Monday, March 26, 2012 11:50:19 AM

Attachments: Cr Electroplating Docket Index Feb 2012.xls

Cr Electroplating MIR Results October 2011.xls

Hello again, Emma,

I have attached a copy of the docket index for the supplemental proposal for Chromium

Electroplating.

As for the other files that you attached in your email to Phil Mulrine, they appear to be

intermediate files used in the risk assessment. I am attaching a different file that shows actual and

allowable emissions for each plant by process type (hard chromium electroplating, decorative

chromium electroplating, chromium anodizing). This file also shows the results of the risk modeling

for hazard index (HI) and maximum individual risk (MIR). The emissions are in units of pounds per

year (lbs/yr).

Please also note that, for most of the plants, annual emissions were simulated. You can identify

those plants for which we had actual data, or which were simulated, by the MACT Code. The three

MACT codes for Cr Electroplating are: 1607 for chromium anodizing, 1610 for decorative chromium

electroplating, and 1615 for hard chromium electroplating. If the code contains a letter, the

emissions values were simulated. For example,”1615” indicates actual data for a hard chromium

electroplating plant, but “1615D” means emissions were simulated’ “1610” means actual

decorative chromium emissions, and “1610D” means simulated decorative chromium

electroplating emissions. Note that the code “1615D” specifically refers to a plant about which we

had no information on the process. Although the number (1615) is the code for hard chromium

electroplating, some of these plants were simulated as decorative chromium or as chromium

electroplating, to ensure that the modeling results matched our estimates of the total number of

each type of plant in the U.S. The Emissions Simulation memo in the docket explains this in more

detail.

Please let me know if you have any question about any of this.

Rick Marinshaw

Richard J. Marinshaw, P.E.

Senior Research Environmental Engineer

RTI International

3040 Cornwallis Road

Post Office Box 12194

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.66 MB)
 
 ADAB exercise exercise security forces firefighters EMT medics defenders first responders 380th AEW Emergency personnel United Arab Emirates Air Force Joint Aviation Command UAEAF JAC
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Opinion issued November 24, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00626-CV

———————————

WILLIE H. ELLISON, BARBARA J. VISER, AND ALL OCCUPANTS OF 

3503 MOSLEY COURT, HOUSTON, TEXAS 77004, Appellants

V.

2515 CAROLINE LTD., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1063370

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants, Willie H. Ellison, Barbara J. Viser and All Occupants of 3503 

Mosley Court, Houston, Texas 77004, have neither paid the required fees nor 

established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; 
2

see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013), 

101.0411 (West Supp. 2014); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme 

Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and before the Judicial Panel on 

Multi-district Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). Further, 

appellants have not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the 

clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal 

was subject to dismissal, appellants did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 5, 42.3(b), (c).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of 

prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Bland.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Walter A. Shephard, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of Zygo Corporation on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended June
30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Zygo Corporation.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Zygo Corporation and will be retained by Zygo Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

| |                                                              | 
| | ------------------------------------------------------------ | 
| | Dated:
 October 26, 2009                                    
| |                                                             
| |                                                             
| | /s/ Walter
 A. Shephard                                      | 
| | Walter A.
 Shephard                                         
| | Vice
 President, Finance,                                   
| | Chief
 Financial Officer, and Treasurer of
 Zygo Corporation

---
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________ No. 21

- 14363 Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus TODD ENGLES,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 6:21

- cr
- 00064

- PGB

- GJK

- 1

____________________ USCA11 Case: 21-14363 Date Filed: 07/28/2022 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 21

- 14363

Before ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, and GRANT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:Michelle Yard, counsel for Todd Engles in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review o f the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal iscorrect. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Engles’s convictio ns and sentences are AFFIRMED. USCA11 Case: 21-14363 Date Filed: 07/28/2022 Page: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ISSUER'S
UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997,
SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,044,733
<SECURITIES>                                 4,502,275
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,444,171
<ALLOWANCES>                                    30,765
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,737,674
<PP&E>                                       2,552,830
<DEPRECIATION>                                 604,994
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,834,997
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,534,357
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,825,589
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,834,997
<SALES>                                     15,858,424
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,858,424
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,428,547
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                96,143
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             150,037
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                375,986
<INCOME-TAX>                                   388,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (12,017)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12,017)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
#### ZIPPERER *v.*SEABOARD AIR-LINE RAILWAY.

Ho cause of action was alleged in the petition, and the general demurrer thereto was properly sustained.

Submitted June 6,

Decided October 8, 1907.

Action for damages. Before Judge Seabrook. Effingham superior court. October SO, 1906.

*D. H. Clark,*for plaintiff. *J. R. Anderson,*for defendant.

Evans, J.

Zipperer sued the railroad company for damages from personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the railroad company. The court dismissed the petition on general demurrer, and this is assigned as error. The plaintiff depended upon substantially the following allegations as showing the defendant’s liability: The plaintiff was a train-hand upon one of defendant’s work-trains; and was directed by the conductor in charge of the train to uncouple- one of the cars, that it might be placed upon the switch. In attempting to obey this command, and while walking along the side of the track, he violently •struck his foot against a steel rail which lay in his path, and was thrown under the moving train, sustaining serious injuries. The Tail against which he stumbled .was- thirty feet long, weighing seventy pounds to the yard, and lying on its side, and presented a sharp projecting surface. The defendant’s negligence was alleged to consist in permitting the steel rail to remain in a place where the defendant knew, or in the exercise of diligence could have known, that plaintiff, in the performance of his duties as *388such train-hand, would be compelled to travel. There is no allegation that it was not'necessary for the railroad company to place the rail where it was, or that it was not placed there in a proper manner. .

We do not think the plaintiff makes a case of negligence against the railroad company. The bare fact that a steel rail was placed, on the- road-bed, near its track, in full view of a passer-by can not be deemed a negligent act. If so, a railroad company could never repair its track by placing necessary material at a convenient place, and in a proper manner, without subjecting itself to liability for every accident occurring on that account at that point. As was remarked in the case of *Lee*v. *Central Railroad Co.,*86 *Ga.*233 (12 S. E. 307), by Bleckley, C. J., “It can not be incumbent on railroad companies, or any one else, in such a world as this, to keep the whole face of the earth on which servants and employees are to execute their functions, clear of every object that may cause an employee to slip up or be thrown down.” Besides, the plaintiff, though affirming in technical phrase that he was free from fault, does not explain why, in the broad open day, he did not see such a plain and distinct object as a steel track rail thirty feet in length. We concur in the judgment of the superior court that no cause of action was set forth, and that the general demurrer was properly sustained.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Rec yyia-/0

Page 1 of 1

ops a

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS
BRANCH [As of: September 03, 2010

PUBLIC Stotusr Posted

SUBMISSION Tracking No. S0b2efed
Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0651
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information
Name: Nola J Briggs
Address:
3175 H Ave
walthill, NE, 68067
Phone: 402-846-5100

General Comment

Attached is letter

Attachments

IRS-2010-0010-0651.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 9/3/2010


August 12, 2010

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIO-9991—IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to
Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

Nola J. Briggs
Walthill, NE. 68067
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 12(b)

                    THE CLARIDGE HOTEL AND CASINO CORPORATION
                (Debtor-In-Possession effective August 16, 1999)

                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (dollars in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 2000            1999           1998            1997             1996
                                                 ----            ----           ----            ----             ----
<S>                                            <C>            <C>             <C>             <C>              <C>
Income (loss) before income
  taxes and extraordinary items                $    516        (38,190)         (9,415)        (5,979)          (20,787)

Add:
  One-third of rent expense to
    Partnership deemed
    representative of interest                    8,587          8,009           8,791         10,185            12,854

  Interest expense                                   42          6,767          10,519         10,567             9,350

  Amortization of capitalized
    interest                                         57             57              57             57                28
                                               --------        -------          ------         ------            ------


Income (loss) as adjusted                      $  9,202        (23,357)          9,952         14,830             1,445
                                               ========        =======          ======         ======            ======


Fixed charges:
  One-third of rent expense to
    Partnership deemed
    representative of interest                 $  8,587          8,009           8,791         10,185            12,854

  Interest expense                                   42          6,767          10,519         10,567             9,350

  Capitalized interest                              -0-            -0-             -0-            -0-             1,069
                                               --------        -------          ------         ------            ------


Fixed charges                                  $  8,629         14,776          19,310         20,752            23,273
                                               ========        =======          ======         ======            ======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                 1.07             (a)             (a)           (a)                (a)
                                               ========        =======          ======         ======            ======
</TABLE>
(a) Earnings in 1999, 1998, 1997 and 1996 were insufficient to cover fixed
charges by $38,133,000, $9,358,000, $5,922,000, and $21,828,000, respectively.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 331 Agreed to House (ATH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 331

Authorizing the Speaker to appoint a committee to notify the President 
                    of the assembly of the Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 23, 2002

Mr. Armey submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the Speaker to appoint a committee to notify the President 
                    of the assembly of the Congress.

    Resolved, That a committee of two Members be appointed by the 
Speaker on the part of the House of Representatives to join with a 
committee on the part of the Senate to notify the President of the 
United States that a quorum of each House has assembled and Congress is 
ready to receive any communication that he may be pleased to make.
                                 <all>
```
#### Jesse M. Humaston and others, Respondents, v. David Beekman, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide event. Opinion by

Vann, J.