alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Feb. 22: Military airstrikes continue against ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq
 
  February 22, 2016
Release # 20160222-01
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **SOUTHWEST ASIA —** On Feb. 21, coalition military forces
continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq. In Syria, coalition
military forces conducted 14 strikes using attack, fighter, and remotely
piloted aircraft against ISIL targets. Additionally in Iraq, coalition military
forces conducted five strikes coordinated with and in support of the Government
of Iraq using fighter aircraft against ISIL targets. 
The following is a summary of the strikes conducted against ISIL since the last
press release:**Syria**
* Near Al Hasakah, seven strikes struck five separate ISIL tactical units and
destroyed an ISIL fighting position, four ISIL buildings, four ISIL vehicles,
and suppressed an ISIL tactical unit and an ISIL heavy machine gun.
* Near Al Hawl, two strikes destroyed two ISIL-used bridges.
* Near Ayn Isa, two strikes destroyed three ISIL buildings and two ISIL
fighting positions and suppressed an ISIL fighting position.
* Near Dayr Az Zawr, three strikes struck three ISIL-used logistics routes.**Iraq**
* Near Fallujah, one strike struck an ISIL tactical unit and suppressed an ISIL
fighting position.
* Near Mosul, one strike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL
vehicle.
* Near Ramadi, one strike struck a large ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an
ISIL staging area.
* Near Sinjar, two strikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and suppressed an ISIL
heavy machine gun position.
Strike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base
safely.
A strike, as defined in the CJTF releases, means one or more kinetic events
that occur in roughly the same geographic location to produce a single,
sometimes cumulative effect for that location. So having a single aircraft
deliver a single weapon against a lone ISIL vehicle is one strike, but so is
multiple aircraft delivering dozens of weapons against a group of buildings and
vehicles and weapon systems in a compound, for example, having the cumulative
effect of making that facility (or facilities) harder or impossible to use.
Accordingly, CJTF-OIR does not report the number or type of aircraft employed
in a strike, the number of munitions dropped in each strike, or the number of
individual munition impact points against a target.
The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation
to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria,
and the wider international community.
The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the group's
ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have
conducted strikes in Iraq include Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France,
Jordan, Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Coalition
nations which have conducted strikes in Syria include Australia, Bahrain,
Canada, France, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, the United
Kingdom, and the United States.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Industrial  Minerals,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report") I, Larry
Van Tol, Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC
section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 10, 2005

/s/Larry Van Tol
------------------------------------------------------------------
Larry Van Tol, Chief Executive Officer and President


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### In the Matter of the Petition of Emory Merrihew, Respondent, for an Order Enjoining Joseph J. Cuneo, Appellant, and Agents, from Trafficking in Liquor Contrary to the Provisions of the Liquor Tax Law.

*Matter of Merrihew*v. Cuneo, 143 App. Div. 862, affirmed.

(Argued April 30, 1912;

decided May 14, 1912.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 16, 1911, which modified and affirmed as modified an order of the Ulster County Court granting the motion of the petitioner in the above-entitled proceeding.

*James Jenkins*for appellant.

*Floyd W. Powell*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ.
---

---

Exhibit 21

List of Subsidiaries
Ampal Financial Services Ltd., an Israeli company
Ampal Development (Israel) Ltd., an Israeli company
Nir Ltd., an Israeli company (in voluntary liquidation)
Ampal Realty Corporation, a New York corporation
Ampal Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Ampal Enterprises Ltd, an Israeli Company.
Ampal Holdings (1991) Ltd., an Israeli company
Ampal Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Ampal Industries (Israel) Ltd. an Israeli company (in 
voluntary liquidation)
Ampal International Ventures (2000) Ltd., an Israeli 
company 
Ampal (Israel) Ltd., a Israeli company
Ampal Properties Ltd., an Israeli company
Ampal Protected Housing Holdings (1966) Ltd., an Israeli 
company
Ampal Protected Housing (1994) Ltd., an Israeli company
Ampal Protected Housing (1998) Ltd., an Israeli company
Am-Hal Ltd., an Israeli company
Country Club Kfar Saba Limited, an Israeli company
Ad 120 Managements - Hod Hasharon, an Israeli company
Ampal Communication LP, an Israeli limited partnership
Ampal Communication Holdings Ltd., an Israeli company

83

---

---
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.07 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Administratorsfact book.**** 
SuDocNumber:TD4.20/2:
ItemNumber:0431-D-08(online)
CGPsystem Number:000570370
 
 
1999
dec99.pdf
2000
apr00.pdf
jul00.pdf
oct00.pdf
2001
jan01.pdf
apr01.pdf
jul01.pdf
oct01.pdf
2002
feb02.pdf
may02.pdf
2003
mar03.pdf
jun03.pdf
dec03.pdf
2004
mar04.pdf
jun04.pdf
nov04.pdf
2005
mar05.pdf
aug05.pdf
nov05.pdf
2006
apr06.pdf
aug06.pdf
dec06.pdf
2007
apr07.pdf
aug07.pdf
2008
jan08.pdf
jul08.pdf
nov08.pdf
2009
mar09.pdf
aug09.pdf
2010
mar10.pdf
sep10.pdf
2011
mar11.pdf
2012
jun12.pdf
 
 
 **
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

CATHERINE JOHNSON,

Petitioner

v.

UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 305 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20th day of November, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### EDWARD C. REEVES ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. STANDARD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Submitted January 27, 1933

Decided July 15, 1933.

Before Justices Bodine and Donges.

For the appellant, *Huston Dixon*and *Louis B. Levine.*

Por the respondents, *John L. Heher*and *Hrwin B. Marshall.*

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Mercer County Court of Common Pleas entered upon the verdict of a jury after a trial before Judge Bobbins. Plaintiffs sought to recover on a policy of fire insurance for damage alleged to have been caused by fire to premises owned by them. The contention of the defendant was that the damage and the fire were caused by an explosion, and therefore there was no liability under the terms of the policy.

The fire occurred early in the morning of January 27th, 1930, in Kane, Pennsylvania. The witness Cartwright, assistant fire chief, testified that he was awakened by an explosion; went to plaintiffs’ house; found fire burning and evidences of more fire which had been burning; he arrived ten minutes after the explosion and said the appearances would indicate a fire had been burning as much as forty-five minutes. The claim of the plaintiff was that the fire preceded *621and caused the explosion, which was caused by illuminating gas.

Three points are argued. First, that the court erred in admitting testimony of a builder as to the cost of replacing the building because the loss was caused by explosion and not by fire. As stated above, the plaintiffs’ claim was, and there was evidence to support it, that the fire was the cause of the explosion and the damage done by both the explosion and the flames was actually caused by fire. Appellant relies upon *Ross*v. *Liverpool and London, &c., Insurance Co.,*83 *N. J. L.*340; 84 *Atl. Rep.*1050, but there the fire which caused the explosion was from a match struck in a garage and not a fire which was actually burning the insured premises. In view of the testimony, the evidence objected to was properly admitted.

Second, that there should have been a nonsuit or directed verdict in favor of defendant. Here the contention is that there was no evidence that the damage resulted from a fire within the terms of the policy. However, a question of fact was clearly presented by the evidence as to whether or not the fire preceded and caused the explosion, and was, therefore, the proximate cause of the damage done. This issue was properly submitted to the jury.

Third, that the court erred in refusing to charge certain requests and in what he did charge with respect to determining whether the fire was the cause of the loss. The refusal to charge the requests was excepted to but seems not to be argued. There was no exception taken to the charge, so the portion set out in the brief cannot now be complained of. At any rate, the ground of objection involves the same point as above discussed and the action of the court was proper.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003 In
connection with Amendment
No. 1 to Form 10-Q of webMethods, Inc
(the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, David Mitchell,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that: (1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date: February 14, 2005
    
    /S/ DAVID MITCHELLName: David Mitchell
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
SECOND AMENDMENT OF THE 
ALPHARMA INC. SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PLAN





The Alpharma Inc. Supplemental Pension Plan (the "Plan") is hereby amended effective as of the dates indicated below, as follows:





"Effective January 1, 2006, the Plan is frozen."







"With respect to determining a participant's supplemental pension benefit, service after December 31, 2005 and compensation paid after the last payroll period ending in 2005, shall not be taken into account."







"Notwithstanding the foregoing, participants (i) whose employment is transferred from the controlled group that includes the Company to the controlled group that includes Actavis Group hf. on or about December 16, 2005, or (ii) who are employees involuntarily terminated as a result of the sale of the Company's generics business, shall be entitled to a benefit under the Plan based on their service through termination date, regardless of whether such participants have completed at least five years of employment service."







"Notwithstanding the foregoing, effective January 1, 2006, upon a participant's termination from employment, a participant's supplemental pension benefit under the Plan shall be paid to the participant, or in the event of his or her death, the participant's beneficiary, in a lump sum on or as soon as administratively practicable following the date that is six months after such Participant's termination from employment.  The lump sum payment shall be determined using the actuarial assumptions used to determine lump sum payments under the Alpharma Inc. Pension Plan as of the date of distribution."

- END -
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****NAEP year-at-a-glance.**
 
SuDoc Number:ED 1.136/10:

Item Number:0455-Q-09 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000547691
 
2000 | 2001 | 2002
 
July 27, 2020
Page | of 1

Z
LEGAL FiUCCSSING DIVISION Ee 1: B4/; 2-(( O AUG 2 4 ?ntq

PUBLICATION & & & REGULA TIONS

As of: August 24, 2010

PUBLIC Status: Posted

Posted: August 24, 2010
SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2030

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0324
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Richard Dean McCaughan
Address:
Columbia, SC, 29223

General Comment

By granting grandfather status to large insurance companies you are simply undermining the
efforts and spirit of the legislation. It's a shame that a loophole is being created to continue to
make insurance difficult for Americans to acquire.

Please see attached.

Attachments

IRS-2010-0010-0324.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/24/2010


August 10, 2010

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention; OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to
Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As aconsumer and Doctor of Chiropractic I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment
on the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-
2010-0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations,

Dean McCaughan, DC
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.12 MB)
 
 Servicemen and women share a common bond and the unshakable belief that they have done something few Senior British Military Advisor (SBMA) U.S. Central Command was reminded of this bond when he met U.S. Army Staff Sgt. (Ret.) Timothy Payn
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### Peter Moller, Jr., and others, Respondents, v. Joseph W. Duryee and others, Appellants.

Order affirmed, without costs. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
#### Elsie Schoonover, Respondent, v. Oscar Beach, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed.— Opinion by

Barker, J.;

Haight, J., not sitting.
** **

**EXHIBIT 25.1**

 

**POWEROF ATTORNEY**

 

 

We, theundersigned directors and officers of PACCAR Financial Corp., a Washingtoncorporation, hereby severally constitute and appoint T. M. Henebry our true andlawful attorney-in-fact, with full power to him to sign for us, and in ournames in the capacities indicated below, a Form 10-K of this corporation forfiscal year 2002 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission underthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, together with any and allamendments to said Form 10-K, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures asthey may be signed by our said attorney-in-fact to said Form 10-K and any andall amendments thereto.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOFeach of the undersigned has executed this power of attorney as of the 10thof March 2003.

 

 
| /s/ Timothy M. Henebry |   | President    |   | /s/ Kenneth R. Gangl |   | Vice Chairman |
|------------------------|--------|--------------|--------|----------------------|--------|---------------|
| Timothy M. Henebry     |   | and Director |   | Kenneth R. Gangl     |   | and Director  |
|                   |   |         |   |                 |   |          |
|                   |   |         |   |                 |   |          |
|                   |   |         |   |                 |   |          |
|                   |   |         |   | /s/ David J. Hovind  |   | Director      |
|                   |   |         |   | David J. Hovind      |   |          |
|                   |   |         |   |                 |   |          |
|                   |   |         |   |                 |   |          |
|                   |   |         |   |                 |   |          |
|                   |   |         |   |                 |   |          |
|                   |   |         |   |                 |   |          |
|                   |   |         |   |                 |   |          |
|                   |   |         |   |                 |   |          |
|                   |   |         |   |                 |   |          |
|                   |   |         |   |                 |   |          |
|                   |   |         |   |                 |   |          |
|                   |   |         |   |                 |   |          |

 

----
EXHIBIT 23








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








As independent registered public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 31, 2010 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Spire Corporation and Subsidiaries as of and for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, included in or made part of this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-22223, 333-128611 and 333-143517).











/s/ Caturano And Company, P.C.





CATURANO And COMPANY, P.C.





Boston, Massachusetts


March 31, 2010