alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0197

SAT Date: 1/18/2013

Print Date: 6/4/2013

Related cases:

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2-3 2

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

2 12

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: IRR/CORROSION-S,E,L,MM, ONCO, MUTA, DEVEL, 

SENS-DERMAL, AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0197

FATE: 

Solid with MP = 118 C (M)

log Kow = 3.49 (E) 

S = 138 mg/L at 25 C (E)

VP = 3.7E-5 torr at 25 C (E)

BP = 297 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

log Koc = 3.44 (E)

log Fish BCF = 1.97 (E)
log Fish BAF = 1.36 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 0-50 via sorption and biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = moderate

PBT Potential: P2B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = moderate

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is nil through the skin as the neat material, 

moderate through the skin when in solution, and moderate through the lungs and GI tract based 

on physical/chemical properties. There is concern for corrosion to all exposed tissues by 

analogy to and oncogenicity by analogy to 

s reported to be positive for oncogenicity in male and female rats 

is reported to be a severe skin and eye 

irritant, a dermal sensitizer in humans, and has an oral LD50 in rats = 2.8 g/kg, a dermal LD50 in 

rabbits = 0.63 g/kg, and a 1-hr exposure to mist evolved at 170C was lethal to rats . 

was also reported to cause tissue necrosis at the site of application in an 

acute dermal study in rats with 80% mortality of females and 0% mortality in males at 2000 

mg/kg Piloerection, subdued behavior, lethargy, ptosis, and prostration were also 

noted. Another study showed to be corrosive to the skin and eyes when 

tested at 85% concentration in water There is also concern for developmental 

toxicity and mutagenicity based on . Moderate high concern. 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 1.3

daphnid 48-h LC50 5.4

green algal 96-h EC50 1.2

fish _ chronic value 0.55

daphnid _ chronic 

value

1.9

algal _ chronic 

value

0.20

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for ; SAR chemical 

class = ; MW 180; solid with mp 118 C (M); log Kow = 3.49 (EPI); S = 138 mg/L 

at 20 C (P); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean 

measured concentrations; DWhardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and DWTOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments
Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

20

SARs

SAR Class

Ecotox Category None

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.76 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6328** 

JULIAN E DWARD ROCHESTER, Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. DAVID M. MCCALL, Warden of Perry Correctional Institution; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; JON OZMINT, Director of Sou th Carolina Department of Corrections , Respondents

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Anderson

. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 8:11

- cv - 00398

- HMH

- JDA )

Submitted : Jul y 28 , 2011 Decided: August 11, 2011

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Julian E dward Rochester , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: South Carolina prisoner Julian Rochester appeals the district court’s dismissal, without prejudice, of his 28
U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition. To the extent that Rochester contends that he is being confined beyond the expirati on of his criminal sentence, his claim is subject to dismissal because Rochester has not demonstrated exhaustion of state remedies, as required by § 2241. See Braden v. 30th Judicial Cir. Ct. , 410 U.S. 484, 489

- 90 (1973). Rochester’s claims of ineffectiv e assistance of counsel challenge the validity of his convictions and should be brought, if at all, in a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition, see Wilkinson v. Dotson , 544 U.S. 74, 78 (2005), if Rochester obtains authorization from this court under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (b)(2) (2006) to file such a petition. Finally, Rochester’s claims of denial of mail and phone privileges and beatings sound under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 0 ). We therefore affirm. We deny the motions for copies of documents and to expedite considerati on of the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS ON FORM
10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         970,997
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,114,148
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,020,928
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,293,586
<PP&E>                                      22,919,385
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,299,072
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,566,109
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,273,242
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,672
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,292,867
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,566,109
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,388,319
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,249,808
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,746,235
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (8,492)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (599,232)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (599,232)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (599,232)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

JASON MATTHEWS,

Petitioner

v.

CYNTHIA BATRONEY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 533 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 7th day of April, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,813,231
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          981,406
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     831,825
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,813,231
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                69,664
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               168,408
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (98,744)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (98,744)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (98,744)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (8)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (8)
        

</TABLE>
From: Donna Mazur

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 8:14:41 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Donna Mazur

11657 Decatur Dr

Westminster, Co 80234
#                     1998 Publications                  

Skip to Page Content

Grassroots Experiences with Government Programs and Disability Policy

Brief Amicus Curiae of the National Council on Disability in Support of Respondents Olmstead v. L.C. HTM

Discipline of Students with Disabilities: A Position Statement

Reorienting Disability Research

Access to Multimedia Technology by People with Sensory Disabilities
Nov. 19: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL in Syria and Iraq
 By U.S. Central Command News Release
  November 19, 2014 RELEASE #20141113FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **TAMPA, Fla., Nov. 19, 2014 -**
 U.S. and partner nation military forces continued to attack ISIL 
terrorists in Syria Nov. 17-19 using fighter and bomber aircraft to 
conduct six airstrikes against ISIL and one U.S. airstrike against a 
network of veteran Al Qaeda operatives, sometimes called the "Khorasan 
Group."  Separately, U.S. and partner nation military forces conducted 
24 airstrikes in Iraq Nov. 17-19 using attack, fighter, bomber and 
remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL terrorists. In Syria, five 
airstrikes near Kobani destroyed one ISIL fighting position, an ISIL 
staging area, three ISIL occupied buildings, suppressed two ISIL 
fighting positions and struck two tactical and one large ISIL unit. One 
airstrike southeast of Al-Hasakah damaged a crude oil collection point 
operated by ISIL.  Finally, in northwest Syria near Haram, a U.S. 
airstrike struck and destroyed a storage facility associated with a 
network of veteran Al Qaeda operatives, sometimes called the "Khorasan 
Group," whose members are plotting external attacks against the United 
States and its allies. In Iraq, thirteen airstrikes near Kirkuk 
destroyed two ISIL fighting positions, seven ISIL staging areas, one 
ISIL mortar position, an ISIL bulldozer and front-loader. Seven 
airstrikes near Mosul struck five ISIL tactical units, damaged an IED 
factory and destroyed an ISIL mortar position, three ISIL vehicles, an 
ISIL occupied building, an ISIL artillery piece and ISIL artillery 
mover.  Three airstrikes near Bayji struck three ISIL tactical units and
 destroyed an ISIL occupied building and an ISIL vehicle. One airstrike 
near Fallujah struck an ISIL tactical unit. All aircraft returned to base safely.  Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. The
 strikes were conducted as part of Inherent Resolve, the operation to 
eliminate the terrorist group ISIL and the threat they pose to Iraq, the
 region and the wider international community.  The destruction of ISIL 
targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group's ability 
to project power and conduct operations.  Coalition nations conducting 
airstrikes in Iraq include the U.S., Australia, Belgium, Canada, 
Denmark, France, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom.  Coalition 
nations conducting airstrikes in Syria include the U.S., Bahrain, 
Jordan, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
From: Kristina Smith

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 6:37:31 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Kristina Smith

5549 Struthers Rd

Struthers, Oh 44471
August 10,2010 

Office ofConsumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCII0-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 2124+-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 


Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 


As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 


.the interim.final rule-regarding health plansand."grandfather·;"'status;(Document.ID,lRS~201 0- . 


0010-0001). 


I believe the consumer protections included as part ofthe new health care law are vitally 


important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 


should be made to increase the number ofindividuals covered by the Patient Protection and 


Affordable Care Act (PP ACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 


extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 


be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 


offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these 


regulations. 


Sincerely. 


William & Welch _ 


fJeJL,( rr O--v­

'-"-~
Coos,

April 2, 1912.

#### Shatney *v.*Shatney.

The court of this state does not have jurisdiction of an action for divorce instituted by a non-resident for a cause which arose here.

Under section 5, chapter 175, Public Statutes, a divorce may be granted to an innocent, non-resident libelee who prays for such relief in an answer and establishes the libelant’s guilt.

Libel for Divorce. After the defendant had begun proceedings for divorce on the ground of desertion, the plaintiff filed this libel, in which she describes herself as a resident of Maine, charges her husband with extreme cruelty, and prays for a divorce, alimony, and the custody of their minor children. She admits that she left her husband, but says that he drove her away. At the September *392.term, 1911, of the superior court, the libel was dismissed by *Pike,*Jl, for want of jurisdiction, and the plaintiff filed a bill of exceptions.

*Libby & Coulombe,*for the plaintiff.

*Leon D. Ripley*and *Thomas F. Johnson,*for the defendant.

Young, J.

The matter in issue in a cause of this kind is the *status*of the parties *(Ditson*v. *Ditson,*4 R. I. 87), and the only jurisdiction the court has of such a cause is that conferred upon it by statute. *Parsons*v. *Parsons,*9 N. H. 309, 317. Consequently, the test to determine whether it has jurisdiction of the plaintiff’s libel is to inquire whether the allegations are sufficient to bring it within the provisions of sections 3 and 4, chapter 175, Public Statutes. As those sections have been construed, the libelant must be a resident of this state at the time the libel is filed. *Kimball*v. *Kimball,*63 N. H. 598. The facts that the defendant is such a resident and that the cause of divorce arose here are not sufficient to give the court jurisdiction. *Burgess*v. *Burgess,*71 N. H. 293.

Although the court did not err in dismissing the plaintiff’s libel, it does not follow that it could not have given her the relief for which she prays, if her libel had been filed as an answer to the defendant’s; for at the time his libel was filed he was and for more than a year had been a resident of this state. His residence gave the court jurisdiction of his *status,*notwithstanding the plaintiff was a non-resident *(Sworoski*v. *Sworoski,*75 N. H. 1); and when it has such jurisdiction, the statute provides that it shall grant the divorce, not to the libelant if he is innocent, but to the innocent party. P. S., c. 175, s. 5. That is, the statute provides that the divorce shall be given to a libelee who asks for it, when the libelee is and the libelant is not an innocent party.

There is nothing to show that it would be inequitable to permit the plaintiff to file her libel as an answer to the defendant’s; and if the court permits that to be done and finds that she is the innocent party within the meaning of section 5, chapter 175, Public Statutes, it will give her a divorce and make such orders in relation to alimony and the custody, maintenance, and education of the minor children as may be just. P. S., *c.*175, ss. 13-18.

*Case discharged.*

All concurred.
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of South Jersey Gas Company (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward J. Graham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Edward J. GrahamName:  Edward J. GrahamTitle:  Chief Executive OfficerAugust 7, 2009
Page 1 of 2

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 9-7 :
HeGAe ANON RecuLanons (EC! [/SF/Q-10 SEP 0 1 2010

BRANCH.

As of: August 31, 2010

PUBLIC Status: Postes

SUBMISSION Fracking Ne. Bob30r49.
Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0494
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

an
Submitter Information

Name: Kenneth M Goldman
Address:

9823 Dungan Road

Philadelphia, PA, 1911S
Email: drken@spectrumwelliness.net
Phone: 215-969-0099
Submitter's Representative: Kenneth Goldman
Organization: Spectrum Wellness
Government Agency Type: Federal
Government Agency: HHS

- SS

General Comment

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status
as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=..._ 8/31/2010


Page 2 of 2

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

-Kenneth M, Goldman

9823 Dungan Road
Philadelphia, PA 19115

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=..._ 8/31/2010