alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: margie wakefield

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 8:20:49 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

margie wakefield

901 kentucky, ste 201

Lawrence, ks 66044
Order entered February 3, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00441-CR

CHRISTOPHER M. DUNLOP, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-82462-2012

ORDER

The Court GRANTS appellant’s February 2, 2015 motion to extend time to file his brief. 

We ORDER appellant’s brief filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          47,089
<SECURITIES>                                    40,300
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,193
<ALLOWANCES>                                       450
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               108,132
<PP&E>                                           4,791
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,107
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 111,816
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,503
<BONDS>                                          3,866
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,789
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           126
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,532
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   111,816
<SALES>                                         11,792
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,792
<CGS>                                            6,725
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,725
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   693
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 349
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,025
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,608
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,417
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,417
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>
Coso PM10 Containment Area 

Fugitive Dust Plan 

This fugitive dust plan shall take into account applicable GBUAPCD Regulations 

Rules associated with Condition 27, Air Monitoring Program, of Permits to 

Operate Numbered 234, 320, 341, 380, 457, 468, 470, and 471. 

Gravel: Gravel will be applied to the initial containment area and monitored. 

Soil Stabilization: The containment area will be saturated with water to form a 

visual crust. The crust will be monitored for disturbance activity and will be 

reapplied after any disturbance occurs. Disturbance of areas where vegetation was 

removed for construction or maintenance will be re-vegetated in the fall and will 

be monitored throughout the year. 

Road Access: Access will be limited to authorized personnel only for the 

maintenance and permit compliance activities. 

Reporting: Coso will provide the District with a monthly status report of dust 

control efforts and activities through June 2011. 

Maps: Location Map Attachment 1 

 Area Map Attachment 2
EXHIBIT 32



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Journal Register Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 28, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Robert
M. Jelenic, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Jean B. Clifton, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Robert M. Jelenic
---------------------
Robert M. Jelenic
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
May 4, 2004


/s/ Jean B. Clifton
-------------------
Jean B. Clifton
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
May 4, 2004



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"), or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as may be expressly set forth by
specific reference in any such filing. A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been provided to Journal Register Company and will be retained by Journal
Register Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.




                                       23
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 20-0128

Filed January 21, 2021

STATE OF IOWA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

LANARD ANTONIO COLLINS,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, Linda M. 

Fangman, Judge.

Lanard Collins appeals the sentences imposed following his guilty pleas to 

possession of marijuana with intent to deliver and failure to affix a drug tax stamp. 

CONVICTIONS AFFIRMED, SENTENCES VACATED, AND REMANDED FOR 

RESENTENCING.

Jennifer Bennett Finn of Pelzer Law Firm, LLC, Estherville, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Israel Kodiaga, Assistant Attorney 

General, for appellee.

Considered by Bower, C.J., and Vaitheswaran and Greer, JJ.
2

VAITHESWARAN, Judge.

Lanard Collins pled guilty to possession of marijuana with intent to deliver 

and failure to affix a drug tax stamp. See Iowa Code §§ 124.401(1)(d), 453B.12

(2019). The district court accepted the pleas.

At the sentencing hearing, the prosecutor recommended “a [five]-year 

prison sentence on each” charge. The prosecutor reasoned in part that Collins 

“had approximately two ounces of marijuana, along with cash, along with a .22-

caliber rifle, located in his residence at the time he was arrested on this charge.” 

Collins’ attorney responded that Collins was not “charged with any sort of 

weapons offense, despite the [S]tate emphasizing that there was a weapon in the 

home.” She noted that the “weapon was legally in the home and did not belong to 

Mr. Collins, but to his father-in-law, and there is no charge about that.” She 

recommended “a suspended sentence, with [two] to [five] years probation on the 

corrections continuum.”

In providing reasons for the sentence, the district court referred to the gun

as follows: “You’re a felon who is selling drugs, and while you’re not charged with 

a rifle—and I’m certainly not punishing you for a rifle—guns and drugs don’t go 

well together. That places people at risk.” The court adjudged Collins guilty of the 

crimes and imposed concurrent five-year prison terms.

On appeal, Collins contends the district court considered an impermissible 

factor. He notes that “this rifle . . . was an unproven, uncharged offense.” 

If a court considers an improper factor in imposing sentence, resentencing 

is required, even if the factor was a secondary consideration and even if the district 
3

court attempts to disclaim the reference. See State v. Lovell, 867 N.W.2d 241, 

243 (Iowa 2014). 

We conclude the court considered an impermissible factor in stating “guns 

and drugs don’t go well together.” Because the statement implies that Collins had 

a gun when he possessed drugs with intent to deliver—a crime with which Collins 

was never charged—we vacate the sentences and remand for resentencing before 

a different judge.

CONVICTIONS AFFIRMED, SENTENCES VACATED, AND REMANDED 

FOR RESENTENCING.
IN DUSTRY PARTI CI PANT LIST FOR MARCH 11, 2010 CONFERENCE CALL

WI TH EPA

Steve Aldridge, Knauf Insulation Lauren Alterman, CertainTeed Corporation John Bolden, USG I nteriors Chris Bullock, Rock Wool Manufacturing Angus Crane, NAIMA Carlos Davis, CertainTeed Corporation Ken Gould, Owens Corning

Tom Lund, Isolatek International Chris Mahin, Knauf Insulation Granta Nakay ama, Kirkland & Ellis Tom Osborn, Fiber TEK Insulation Jessie Pay

ne, IIG Mike Pettis, Owens Corning Jeff Tarde, Johns Manville Grover Thomas, G uardian Fiberglass Brent Tracy , Johns Manville
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6800

RANDALL LEE GOODALL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MICHELLE HODGES; MS. HAMLIN; JOHN B. TAYLOR;

ASSISTANT WARDEN PONTON; C. TERRY; CAPTAIN

BARKSDALE; D. OTTINGER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District

Judge. (CA-95-867-R)

Submitted: November 27, 1996 Decided: December 19, 1996

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randall Lee Goodall, Appellant Pro Se. Lance Bradford Leggitt,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Randall Lee Goodall appeals the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm largely on the reasoning of the district court. Goodall v. Hodges, No. CA-95-867-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 16,

1996). We write separately only to note that although claims of

defamation may sometimes be cognizable under § 1983 by alleging injury to a constitutionally protected right, Appellant's defamation

claim was nonetheless properly dismissed. We also note that while

inmates do have a right to seek correction of inaccurate information in their prison files when such information is relied upon to

a constitutionally significant degree, Appellant has not demonstrated a sufficient request to prison authorities to expunge the

allegedly improper material. Accordingly, we are without jurisdiction to consider this claim. Paine v. Baker, 595 F.2d 197, 202-03

(4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 925 (1979). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### William J. Chase v. Nelson Chase.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
From: Micaela Gutierrez

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:16:04 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Micaela Gutierrez

241 E 111 Street Apt. 8

New York, NY 10029
From: Patrick Carson

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Thursday, August 04, 2011 2:57:00 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Patrick Carson
Norwood, Pennsylvania
EXHIBIT 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

WHEREAS,
McDATA Corporation, a Delaware corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Company"), proposes to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, under the provisions of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, an annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005; and

WHEREAS,
each of the undersigned is a Director of the Company:

NOW,
THEREFORE, each of the undersigned constitutes and appoints JOHN A. KELLEY, JR., ERNEST J. SAMPIAS and THOMAS O. McGIMPSEY, and each of them, as attorneys for him or her and in his
or her name, place and stead, and in his or her capacity as a Director of the Company, to execute and file such annual report, and thereafter to execute and file an amendment or amendments thereto on
Form 10-K, hereby giving and granting to said attorneys full power and authority to do and perform all and every act and thing whatsoever requisite and necessary to be done in and
about the premises as fully, to all intents and purposes, as he or she might or could do if personally present at the doing thereof, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys may or
shall lawfully do, or cause to be done, by virtue hereof.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney this 1st day of April, 2005.

|/s/JOHN A. KELLEY, JR.John A. Kelley, Jr.
Chairman and CEO |  | April 1, 2005 |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------- |  | 
|/s/JOHN W. GERDELMANJohn W. Gerdelman                      |  | April 1, 2005 |  | 
|/s/CHARLES C. JOHNSTONCharles C. Johnston                  |  | April 1, 2005 |  | 
|/s/D. VAN SKILLINGD. Van Skilling                          |  | April 1, 2005 |  | 
|/s/THOMAS M. UHLMANThomas M. Uhlman                        |  | April 1, 2005 |  | 
|/s/LAURENCE G. WALKERLaurence G. Walker                    |  | April 1, 2005 |  | 
|/s/BETSY S. ATKINSBetsy S. Atkins                          |  | April 1, 2005 |  | 
|/s/MICHAEL J. SOPHIEMichael J. Sophie                      |  | April 1, 2005 |  | 
|/s/M. ALEX MENDEZM. Alex Mendez                            |  | April 1, 2005 |  | 



QuickLinks
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09
- 2 2
- 00 280
- CV

__________________
IN RE SILURIA (ASSIGNMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF CREDITORS), LLC

__________________________________________________________________ Original Proceeding 284th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 21
- 03
- 03166
- CV

__________________________________________________________________ ORDER In Re Siluria (assignment for the benefit of creditors), LLC , Relator, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus and a motion for temporary relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator is a defendant in an interpleader action filed in Trial Cause Number
21

- 03

- 03166

- CV , styled St ibbs & Co., PC v. Lummus Technology LLC and Siluria (Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors) , LLC

. Relator seeks a writ compelling the Honorable Kristin Bays , Judge of the 284th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas, to vacate a n o rder d enying a mot ion to quash a jury demand and grant the motion to quash

. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221.2 Relator requests that the jury trial in the trial court be stayed w hile this Court considers the mandamus petition. The Court finds temporary relief is necessary to prevent undue prejudice. It is ORDERED that all the jury trial in Trial Cause Number
21

- 03

- 03166 is STAYED until our opinion issues or until further order of this Court.
See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(b). No bond is required of Relator as a condition to any relief herein granted. The response of the Real Part y in Interest, Lummus Technology LLC , is due September 12, 2022

. MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF GRANTED.
ORDER ENTERED August 31 , 202 2

. PER CURIAM Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ.
From: Mary Borrelli

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:57:25 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Mary Borrelli

43 East Park Ave

Lynn, MA 01902
PUBLIC LAW 109–83—SEPT. 30, 2005 119 STAT. 2053

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1752:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):

Sept. 22, considered and passed Senate.

Sept. 28, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 109–83

109th Congress

An Act

To amend the United States Grain Standards Act to reauthorize that Act.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF ACT.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Sections 7(j)(4), 7A(l)(3), 7D, 19, and 21(e)

of the United States Grains Standards Act (7 U.S.C. 79(j)(4),

79a(l)(3), 79d, 87h, 87j(e)) are amended by striking ‘‘2005’’ each

place it appears and inserting ‘‘2015’’.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection

(a) take effect on September 30, 2005.

Approved September 30, 2005.

7 USC 79 note.

Sept. 30, 2005

[S. 1752]
IV

House Calendar No. 182

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 464

[Report No. 107–552]

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 27 (legislative day, JUNE 26), 2002

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported

from the Committee on Rules.

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of Thursday, June 27, 2002,

6 providing for consideration or disposition of the bill (H.R.

7 4954) to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to
2

HRES 464 RH

1 provide for a voluntary program for prescription drug cov2 erage under the Medicare Program, to modernize and re3 form payments and the regulatory structure of the Medi4 care Program, and for other purposes.

House Calendar No. 182

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 464

[Report No. 107–552]

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII

with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

JUNE 27 (legislative day, JUNE 26), 2002

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Nicola Cunsoli, Appellant.

(Argued April 5, 1912;

decided April 12, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court rendered February 2, 1911, at a Trial Term for the county of Rensselaer, upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of murder in the first degree.

*John P. Judge*and *Frank 8. Parmenter*for appellant.

*Clarence F. Akin, District Attorney (.Abbott PI. Jones*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.