This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains documents other than rules or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency statements of organization and functions are examples of documents appearing in this

section. 

# Notices Federal Register 

### 41741

Vol. 77, No. 136

Monday, July 16, 2012

**DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE**

**Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request** 

July 10, 2012.

The Department of Agriculture has submitted the following information collection requirement(s) to OMB for
review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13. Comments regarding (a) Whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of burden including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology should be addressed to: Desk Officer for Agriculture, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB),

OIRA

_ Submission@OMB.EOP.GOV or fax (202) 395–5806 and to Departmental Clearance Office, USDA, OCIO, Mail Stop 7602, Washington, DC 20250– 7602. Comments regarding these
information collections are best assured of having their full effect if received within 30 days of this notification. Copies of the submission(s) may be obtained by calling (202) 720–8958.

An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information
unless the collection of information displays a currently valid OMB control number and the agency informs potential persons who are to respond to
the collection of information that such persons are not required to respond to the collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control
number.

Economic Research Service

Title: Survey on Rural Community
Wealth and Health Care Provision.

OMB Control Number: 0536–NEW. Summary of Collection: Health care services is one of the largest and most rapidly growing industries in rural America, and adequate provision of
health care services is critical for achieving economic development and improved well-being of rural people. In many rural communities, the health care services sector is the largest employer, and rapid growth in this sector is occurring and likely will continue, especially as the Baby-Boom generation retires. Provision of adequate health care services may be a key factor attracting retirees and other migrants to rural areas, contributing to rural growth and prosperity. Despite recent growth and potential for continued growth in this sector, many rural communities suffer from poor access to health care services, especially because of the limited supply of health care professionals.

Need and Use of the Information: The
Economic Research Service will collect information using a survey on the assets
and investments of rural communities
and their influence on recruitment and retention of rural health care providers,
and on the effects of rural health care provision on economic development of rural communities. The survey will be collected by telephone from individuals, including rural health care providers and community leaders, in 150 rural
communities. If the information is not collected, research and knowledge on the roles rural communities play in recruiting and retaining health care providers will remain limited.

Description of Respondents: Individuals or household; State, Local
or Tribal Government.

Number of Respondents: 4,500. Frequency of Responses: Reporting:

On occasion.

Total Burden Hours: 1,865.

Ruth Brown, Departmental Information Collection Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012–17234 Filed 7–13–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3410–18–P CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD** 
**INVESTIGATION BOARD**

**Sunshine Act Meeting**

In connection with its continued analysis of effective safety performance indicators for major accident prevention and to release preliminary findings on the use of indicators offshore as part of the agency’s investigation of the Macondo well blowout, explosion, and fire in the Gulf of Mexico, the U.S. Chemical Safety Board is holding a two day public hearing entitled ‘‘Safety Performance Indicators,’’ on Monday, July 23, 2012, and Tuesday, July 24, 2012, in Houston, Texas. The hearing will be held from 9 a.m.–5 p.m. both days at the Hyatt Regency Hotel located at 1200 Louisiana Street in the Imperial West Auditorium. The hearing is free and open to members of the public.

The hearing will bring together international regulators, union representatives and industry groups to discuss how companies and regulators use safety metrics to manage risks and drive continuous safety improvements.

The CSB’s Board Members and Macondo investigation team will hear testimony from leading safety experts from high hazard industry sectors within the U.S. and internationally, including representatives from the United Kingdom, Australia, and Norway. Throughout the proceedings, CSB Board Members, staff and the public will have opportunities to ask questions of the panelists. The hearing
will be available via webcast. All proceedings will be videotaped and subsequently transcribed.

The first day of the hearing will focus on the downstream refining and petrochemical sectors. It will feature a presentation by CSB staff on the Board’s
evaluation of the American Petroleum Institute’s (API) Recommended Practice for Process Safety Performance Indicators for the Refining and Petrochemical Industries (ANSI/API RP 754). API RP 754 was developed in response to a CSB recommendation resulting from the agency’s investigation into the BP Texas City refinery fire and explosion that killed 15 workers and injured 180 others. The CSB found that effective safety performance indicators for major accident prevention were not being used to drive safety improvements. The lessons learned from other high hazard industries with


### 41742 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 136 / Monday, July 16, 2012 / Notices

1 The Regulations are currently codified in the Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR Parts 730– 774 (2012). The charged violations occurred in 2006–2008. The Regulations governing the
violations at issue are found in the 2006–2008 versions of the Code of Federal Regulations (15 CFR Parts 730–774 (2006–2008)). The 2012 Regulations set forth the procedures that apply to this matter.

2 50 U.S.C. app. §§ 2401–2420 (2000). Since August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse and the President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended by successive Presidential Notices, the most recent being that of August 12, 2011 (76 FR 50661 (Aug. 16, 2011)), continues the Regulations in effect under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, et seq. ). advanced indicator programs will also be discussed during the first day of the hearing.

The second day will include a presentation by CSB staff on preliminary findings of the agency’s Macondo incident investigation on the use of safety indicators and major accident prevention. Evidence will be presented on the way safety was managed at Macondo and the influence of the regulator in driving safety performance offshore.

All staff presentations are preliminary and are intended solely to allow the Board to consider in a public forum the
issues and factors involved in this case. No factual analyses, conclusions or findings presented by staff should be considered final until approved by the
Board.

Please notify CSB if a translator or interpreter is needed, at least 5 business days prior to the public meeting. For more information, please contact Hillary J. Cohen at hillary.cohen@csb.gov at the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board at (202)–261–7600,
or visit our Web site at: www.csb.gov.

The CSB is an independent Federal agency charged with investigating
industrial accidents that result in the release of extremely hazardous substances. The agency’s board members are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. CSB investigations look into all aspects of accidents, including physical causes such as equipment failure as well as inadequacies in regulations, industry standards, and safety management systems.

Daniel Horowitz,
Managing Director.

[FR Doc. 2012–17304 Filed 7–12–12; 11:15 am]

**BILLING CODE 6350–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE**

**Foreign-Trade Zones Board**

**[Order No. 1838]**

**Reorganization and Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 202 Under** 
**Alternative Site Framework Los Angeles, CA** 

Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, asamended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (74 FR 1170, 01/12/2009; correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/2009; 75 FR 71069–71070, 11/22/2010) as an option for the establishment or reorganization of general-purpose zones;

Whereas, the Board of Harbor Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 202, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket 9–2012, filed 02/09/ 2012) for authority to reorganize and expand under the ASF with a service area of Orange County and portions of Los Angeles and San Bernardino Counties, California, within and adjacent to the Los Angeles-Long Beach
U.S. Customs and Border Protection port of entry, FTZ 202’s Site 9 would be
renumbered to create new Sites 30 and 31, Sites 1, 4, 7, 10–11, 14, 20 and 22 would be categorized as magnet sites, Sites 2, 5, 9, 12, 15, 19, 25, 27–28 and 30–31 would be categorized as usage driven sites, Sites 16, 24 and 26 would be removed from the zone project, andthe grantee proposes one new usagedriven site (Site 29);

Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal Register (77 FR 8804–8805, 02/15/2012) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations; and,

Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendation of the examiner’s report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the public interest;

Now, therefore, the Board hereby
orders:

The application to reorganize FTZ 202
under the alternative site framework is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including Section 400.13, to the Board’s standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the overall general-purpose zone project, to a five-year ASF sunset provision for magnet sites that would terminate authority for Sites 4, 7, 10–11, 14, 20 and 22 if not activated by July 31, 2017, and to a three-year ASF sunset provision for usage-driven sites that would terminate authority for Sites 2, 5,9, 12, 15, 19, 25, 27–31 if no foreignstatus merchandise is admitted for a bona fide customs purpose by July 31,

2015.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of July 2012. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary of Commerce for ImportAdministration, Alternate Chairman, ForeignTrade Zones Board. Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012–17294 Filed 7–13–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE** 

**Bureau of Industry and Security**

**In the Matter of: Humane Restraint, Inc., 912 Bethel Circle, Waunakee, WI**  **53597, Respondent; Order Relating To Humane Restraint, Inc** 

The Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘BIS’’), has notified Humane Restraint, Inc. of Wanakee, WI (‘‘HR’’), of its intention to initiate an administrative proceeding against HR pursuant to Section 766.3 of the Export Administration Regulations (the ‘‘Regulations’’), 1 and Section 13(c) of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’), 2 through the issuance of a Proposed Charging Letter to HR that alleged that HR
committed 32 violations of the Regulations. Specifically, these charges

are:
Charges 1–27 15 CFR 764.2(a)— Engaging in Prohibited Conduct by Exporting Various Restraint Devices Without the Required Government
Authorizations

On 27 occasions between on or about April 10, 2006 and on or about August 8, 2008, HR engaged in conduct prohibited by the Regulations by exporting various restraint devices, including, but not limited to, strait jackets, bed restraints, and wrist and ankle restraints, items subject to the Regulations, classified under Export
Control Classification Number (‘‘ECCN’’) 0A982, controlled for Crime Control reasons, and valued at approximately $14,697, from the United States to Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, New Zealand, South Korea, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom without the Department of Commerce licenses required by Section 742.7(a) of the Regulations. In so doing, HR
committed 27 violations of Section 764.2(a) of the Regulations.