80–489 PDF

Calendar No. 479

107TH CONGRESS REPORT

2d Session " ! SENATE 107–202

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATION BILL, 2003

JULY 3, 2002.—Ordered to be printed

Filed, under the authority of the order of the Senate of June 26, 2002

Mrs. FEINSTEIN, from the Committee on Appropriations,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany S. 2709]

The Committee on Appropriations reports the bill (S. 2709) making appropriations for military construction, family housing, and

base realignment and closure for the Department of Defense for the

fiscal year ending September 30, 2003, and for other purposes, reports favorably thereon and recommends that the bill do pass.

Total of bill as reported to Senate ........................... $10,622,000,000

Amount of 2003 budget estimate ............................ 9,664,041,000

Amount of 2002 appropriations ............................... 10,604,400,000

The bill as reported to the Senate:

Over the budget estimate, 2003 ....................... 957,959,000

Over appropriations for fiscal year 2002 ......... 17,600,000
(2)

CONTENTS

Page

Background:

Purpose of the bill ............................................................................................ 3

Comparative statement .................................................................................... 3

Compliance with section 308 of the Budget Control Act ............................... 9

Committee recommendation ................................................................................... 9

Accrual funding of retirement costs and post-retirement health benefits .......... 9

Items of special interest .......................................................................................... 11

Military construction, Army .................................................................................... 17

Military construction, Navy .................................................................................... 18

Military construction, Air Force ............................................................................. 19

Military construction, Defense-wide ....................................................................... 20

Military construction, Reserve components ........................................................... 23

NATO Security Investment Program ..................................................................... 26

Family housing overview ........................................................................................ 27

Family housing, Army ............................................................................................. 27

Family housing, Navy and Marine Corps .............................................................. 28

Family housing, Air Force ....................................................................................... 29

Family housing, Defense-wide ................................................................................ 31

Family housing improvement fund ........................................................................ 31

Base realignment and closure account, part IV .................................................... 32

General provisions ................................................................................................... 34

Compliance with paragraph 7, rule XVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate ... 35

Compliance with paragraph 7(c), rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of the

Senate ................................................................................................................... 35

Compliance with paragraph 12, rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of the

Senate ................................................................................................................... 36

Project listing by location ........................................................................................ 36
(3)

BACKGROUND

PURPOSE OF THE BILL

The Military Construction appropriation bill provides necessary

funding for the planning, design, construction, alteration, and improvement of military facilities worldwide, both for Active and Reserve Forces. It also finances the construction, alteration, improvement, operation, and maintenance of military family housing, including payments against past housing mortgage indebtedness.

Certain types of community impact assistance may be provided, as

well as assistance to members of the military who face loss on the

sale of private residences due to installation realignments and closures. The bill is also the source for the U.S. share of the NATO

Security Investment Program. In addition, the bill provides funding

to implement base closures and realignments authorized by law.

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT

The Committee recommends appropriations totaling $10,622,000,000 for fiscal year 2003 military construction, family

housing, and base closure. The following table displays the Committee recommendation in comparison with the current fiscal year,

and the President’s fiscal year 2003 request.
4

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY

[In thousands of dollars]

Item 2002 enacted Budget estimate Committee rec- ommendation

Increase (∂) or decrease (¥) compared

with—

2002 enacted Budget estimate

Military construction, Army .................................................................................................................... 1,778,256 1,450,438 1,456,747 ¥321,509 ∂6,309

Defense emergency response fund (DERF) ................................................................................... ................................ 222,465 222,465 ∂222,465 ................................Rescission ...................................................................................................................................... ¥36,400 ................................ ¥13,676 ∂22,724 ¥13,676Emergency appropriations (Public Law 107–117) ........................................................................ 20,700 ................................ ................................ ¥20,700 ................................

Total .......................................................................................................................................... 1,762,556 1,672,903 1,665,536 ¥97,020 ¥7,367

Military construction, Navy ..................................................................................................................... 1,144,221 884,661 995,913 ¥148,308 ∂111,252

Defense emergency response fund (DERF) ................................................................................... ................................ 220,730 220,730 ∂220,730 ................................Rescission ...................................................................................................................................... ¥19,588 ................................ ¥1,340 ∂18,248 ¥1,340Emergency appropriations (Public Law 107–117) ........................................................................ 2,000 ................................ ................................ ¥2,000 ................................

Total .......................................................................................................................................... 1,126,633 1,105,391 1,215,303 ∂88,670 ∂109,912

Military construction, Air Force .............................................................................................................. 1,194,880 644,090 987,320 ¥207,560 ∂343,230

Defense emergency response fund (DERF) ................................................................................... ................................ 190,597 188,297 ∂188,297 ¥2,300Rescission ...................................................................................................................................... ¥4,000 ................................ ¥10,281 ¥6,281 ¥10,281Emergency appropriations (Public Law 107–117) ........................................................................ 46,700 ................................ ................................ ¥46,700 ................................

Total .......................................................................................................................................... 1,237,580 834,687 1,165,336 ¥72,244 ∂330,649

Military construction, Defense-wide ....................................................................................................... 840,558 740,535 895,942 ∂55,384 ∂155,407

Defense emergency response fund (DERF) ................................................................................... ................................ 31,300 31,300 ∂31,300 ................................Rescissions .................................................................................................................................... ¥69,280 ................................ ¥2,976 ∂66,304 ¥2,976Emergency appropriations (Public Law 107–117) ........................................................................ 35,000 ................................ ................................ ¥35,000 ................................

Total .......................................................................................................................................... 806,278 771,835 924,266 ∂117,988 ∂152,431Total, Active components .......................................................................................................... 4,933,047 4,384,816 4,970,441 ∂37,394 ∂585,625

Military construction, Army National Guard ........................................................................................... 405,565 101,595 208,482 ¥197,083 ∂106,887Military construction, Air National Guard .............................................................................................. 253,386 53,473 209,055 ¥44,331 ∂155,582

Defense emergency response fund (DERF) ................................................................................... ................................ 8,933 8,933 ∂8,933 ................................
5

Total .......................................................................................................................................... 253,386 62,406 217,988 ¥35,398 ∂155,582

Military construction, Army Reserve ....................................................................................................... 167,019 58,779 66,487 ¥100,532 ∂7,708Military construction, Naval Reserve ..................................................................................................... 53,201 51,554 51,554 ¥1,647 ................................

Defense emergency response fund (DERF) ................................................................................... ................................ 7,117 7,117 ∂7,117 ................................Rescission ...................................................................................................................................... ¥925 ................................ ................................ ∂925 ................................

Total .......................................................................................................................................... 52,276 58,671 58,671 ∂6,395 ................................

Military construction, Air Force Reserve ................................................................................................ 74,857 31,900 54,633 ¥20,224 ∂22,733

Defense emergency response fund (DERF) ................................................................................... ................................ 6,076 3,576 ∂3,576 ¥2,500

Total .......................................................................................................................................... 74,857 37,976 58,209 ¥16,648 ∂20,233Total, Reserve components ....................................................................................................... 953,103 319,427 609,837 ¥343,266 ∂290,410Total, Military construction ....................................................................................................... 5,886,150 4,704,243 5,580,278 ¥305,872 ∂876,035

Appropriations .................................................................................................................. (5,911,943) (4,017,025) (4,926,133) (¥985,810) (∂909,108)Defense emergency response fund .................................................................................. ................................ (687,218) (682,418) (∂682,418) (¥4,800)Emergency appropriations ............................................................................................... (104,400) ................................ ................................ (¥104,400) ................................Rescissions ...................................................................................................................... (¥130,193) ................................ (¥28,273) (∂101,920) (¥28,273)

North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program ......................................................... 162,600 168,200 168,200 ∂5,600 ................................Family housing, Army:

Construction .................................................................................................................................. 312,742 283,346 282,856 ¥29,886 ¥490

Rescission ............................................................................................................................. ................................ ................................ ¥4,920 ¥4,920 ¥4,920

Operation and maintenance .......................................................................................................... 1,089,573 1,119,007 1,119,007 ∂29,434 ................................

Total, Family housing, Army ..................................................................................................... 1,402,315 1,402,353 1,396,943 ¥5,372 ¥5,410

Family housing, Navy and Marine Corps:

Construction .................................................................................................................................. 331,780 375,700 374,468 ∂42,688 ¥1,232

Rescission ............................................................................................................................. ................................ ................................ ¥2,652 ¥2,652 ¥2,652

Operation and maintenance .......................................................................................................... 910,095 867,788 867,788 ¥42,307 ................................

Total, Family housing, Navy and Marine Corps ....................................................................... 1,241,875 1,243,488 1,239,604 ¥2,271 ¥3,884

Family housing, Air Force:

Construction .................................................................................................................................. 550,703 676,694 676,694 ∂125,991 ................................

Rescission ............................................................................................................................. ................................ ................................ ¥8,782 ¥8,782 ¥8,782

Operation and maintenance .......................................................................................................... 844,715 844,419 844,419 ¥296 ................................
6

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Item 2002 enacted Budget estimate Committee rec- ommendation

Increase (∂) or decrease (¥) compared

with—

2002 enacted Budget estimate

Defense emergency response fund (DERF) .......................................................................... ................................ 29,631 29,631 ∂29,631 ................................

Total, Family housing, Air Force ...................................................................................... 1,395,418 1,550,744 1,541,962 ∂146,544 ¥8,782

Family housing, Defense-wide:

Construction .................................................................................................................................. 250 5,480 5,480 ∂5,230 ................................Operation and maintenance .......................................................................................................... 43,762 42,395 42,395 ¥1,367 ................................

Total, Family housing, Defense-wide ........................................................................................ 44,012 47,875 47,875 ∂3,863 ................................

Department of Defense Family Housing Improvement Fund ................................................................. 2,000 2,000 2,000 ................................ ................................Homeowners assistance fund, Defense ................................................................................................. 10,119 ................................ ................................ ¥10,119 ................................

(By transfer) .................................................................................................................................. (7,730) ................................ ................................ (¥7,730) ................................

Total, Family housing ............................................................................................................... 4,095,739 4,246,460 4,228,384 ∂132,645 ¥18,076

Base realignment and closure account ................................................................................................. 632,713 545,138 645,138 ∂12,425 ∂100,000

(Transfer out) ................................................................................................................................ (¥7,730) ................................ ................................ (∂7,730) ................................

Total .......................................................................................................................................... 632,713 545,138 645,138 ∂12,425 ∂100,000

GENERAL PROVISIONS

General provision (sec. 130) .................................................................................................................. ¥60,000 ................................ ................................ ∂60,000 ................................General provision (sec. 132) .................................................................................................................. ¥112,802 ................................ ................................ ∂112,802 ................................

Total, General provisions .......................................................................................................... ¥172,802 ................................ ................................ ∂172,802 ................................Grand total:

New budget (obligational) authority ................................................................................ 10,604,400 9,664,041 10,622,000 ∂17,600 ∂957,959

Appropriations ......................................................................................................... (10,630,193) (8,947,192) (9,954,578) (¥675,615) (∂1,007,386)Defense emergency response fund ......................................................................... ................................ (716,849) (712,049) (∂712,049) (¥4,800)Emergency appropriations ...................................................................................... (104,400) ................................ ................................ (¥104,400) ................................Rescissions ............................................................................................................. (¥130,193) ................................ (¥44,627) (∂85,566) (¥44,627)
7

(Transfer out) ................................................................................................................... (¥7,730) ................................ ................................ (∂7,730) ................................(By transfer) ..................................................................................................................... (7,730) ................................ ................................ (¥7,730) ................................

SUMMARY OF APPROPRIATIONS ACCOUNTS

Military Construction, Army .................................................................................................................... 1,762,556 1,672,903 1,665,536 ¥97,020 ¥7,367Military Construction, Navy .................................................................................................................... 1,126,633 1,105,391 1,215,303 ∂88,670 ∂109,912Military Construction, Air Force .............................................................................................................. 1,237,580 834,687 1,165,336 ¥72,244 ∂330,649Military Construction, Defense-wide ...................................................................................................... 806,278 771,835 924,266 ∂117,988 ∂152,431

Total, Active components .......................................................................................................... 4,933,047 4,384,816 4,970,441 ∂37,394 ∂585,625

Military Construction, Army National Guard .......................................................................................... 405,565 101,595 208,482 ¥197,083 ∂106,887Military Construction, Air National Guard .............................................................................................. 253,386 62,406 217,988 ¥35,398 ∂155,582Military Construction, Army Reserve ...................................................................................................... 167,019 58,779 66,487 ¥100,532 ∂7,708Military Construction, Naval Reserve ..................................................................................................... 52,276 58,671 58,671 ∂6,395 ................................Military Construction, Air Force Reserve ................................................................................................ 74,857 37,976 58,209 ¥16,648 ∂20,233

Total, Reserve components ....................................................................................................... 953,103 319,427 609,837 ¥343,266 ∂290,410Total, Military Construction ...................................................................................................... 5,886,150 4,704,243 5,580,278 ¥305,872 ∂876,035

North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program ......................................................... 162,600 168,200 168,200 ∂5,600 ................................Family Housing, Army:

Construction .................................................................................................................................. 312,742 283,346 277,936 ¥34,806 ¥5,410Operation and Maintenance .......................................................................................................... 1,089,573 1,119,007 1,119,007 ∂29,434 ................................

Family Housing, Navy and Marine Corps:

Construction .................................................................................................................................. 331,780 375,700 371,816 ∂40,036 ¥3,884Operation and Maintenance .......................................................................................................... 910,095 867,788 867,788 ¥42,307 ................................

Family Housing, Air Force:

Construction .................................................................................................................................. 550,703 676,694 667,912 ∂117,209 ¥8,782Operation and Maintenance .......................................................................................................... 844,715 874,050 874,050 ∂29,335 ................................

Family Housing, Defense-wide:

Construction .................................................................................................................................. 250 5,480 5,480 ∂5,230 ................................Operation and Maintenance .......................................................................................................... 43,762 42,395 42,395 ¥1,367 ................................

Department of Defense Family Housing Improvement Fund ................................................................. 2,000 2,000 2,000 ................................ ................................Homeowners Assistance Fund, Defense ................................................................................................. 10,119 ................................ ................................ ¥10,119 ................................
8

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Item 2002 enacted Budget estimate Committee rec- ommendation

Increase (∂) or decrease (¥) compared

with—

2002 enacted Budget estimate

Total, Family Housing ............................................................................................................... 4,095,739 4,246,460 4,228,384 ∂132,645 ¥18,076

Base Realignment and Closure Account ............................................................................................... 632,713 545,138 645,138 ∂12,425 ∂100,000General Provisions .................................................................................................................................. ¥172,802 ................................ ................................ ∂172,802 ................................

Grand Total ............................................................................................................................... 10,604,400 9,664,041 10,622,000 ∂17,600 ∂957,959
9

COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 308 OF THE BUDGET CONTROL ACT

Section 308(a) of the Budget and Impoundment Control Act of

1974 (Public Law 93–344) requires that the Committee include in

its report a comparison of its recommendations with levels contained in the first concurrent resolution. Appropriate data are reflected below:

BUDGETARY IMPACT OF BILL

PREPARED IN CONSULTATION WITH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE PURSUANT TO SEC.

308(a), PUBLIC LAW 93–344, AS AMENDED

[In millions of dollars]

Budget authority Outlays

Committee

allocation 1

Amount

of bill

Committee

allocation 1

Amount

of bill

Comparison of amounts in the bill with Committee allocations

to its subcommittees, fiscal year 2003: Subcommittee on

Military Construction:

Discretionary ........................................................................ 10,622 10,622 10,122 2 10,120

Projections of outlays associated with the recommendation:

2003 ..................................................................................... .................... .................... .................... 3 2,771

2004 ..................................................................................... .................... .................... .................... 4,025

2005 ..................................................................................... .................... .................... .................... 2,370

2006 ..................................................................................... .................... .................... .................... 836

2007 and future years ........................................................ .................... .................... .................... 576

Financial assistance to State and local governments for

2003 ......................................................................................... NA .................... NA ....................

1 Levels approved by the Committee on June 26, 2002.

2 Includes outlays from prior-year budget authority.

3 Excludes outlays from prior-year budget authority.

NA: Not applicable.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends new fiscal year 2003 appropriations

of $10,622,000,000. This is $957,959,000 over the budget request,

and $17,600,000 over the appropriations for fiscal year 2002. The

basis for this recommendation is contained in the following ‘‘Items

of special interest,’’ and under the discussions pertaining to each

individual appropriation. Complete project detail is provided in the

tables at the end of the report.

ACCRUAL FUNDING OF RETIREMENT COSTS AND POSTRETIREMENT HEALTH BENEFITS

The President’s Budget included a legislative proposal under the

jurisdiction of the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs to

charge to individual agencies, starting in fiscal year 2003, the fully

accrued costs related to retirement benefits of Civil Service Retirement System employees and retiree health benefits for all civilian

employees. The Budget also requested an additional dollar amount

in each affected discretionary account to cover these accrued costs.

The authorizing committee has not acted on this legislation,

therefore the Senate Appropriations Committee has reduced the

dollar amounts of the President’s request shown in the ‘‘Comparative Statement of New Budget Authority Request and Amounts
10

Recommended in the Bill’’, as well as in other tables in this report,

to exclude the accrual funding proposal.

The Committee further notes that administration proposals requiring legislative action by the authorizing committees of Congress are customarily submitted in the budget as separate schedules apart from the regular appropriations requests. Should such

a proposal be enacted, a budget amendment formally modifying the

President’s appropriation request for discretionary funding is subsequently transmitted to the Congress.

The Senate Appropriations Committee joins with the House Appropriations Committee in raising concern that this practice, which

has always worked effectively for both Congress and past administrations, was not followed for the accrual funding proposal. In this

case, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) decided to include accrual amounts in the original discretionary appropriations

language request. These amounts are based on legislation that has

yet to be considered and approved by the appropriate committees

of Congress. This led to numerous misunderstandings both inside

and outside of Congress of what was the ‘‘true’’ President’s budget

request. The Committee believes that, in the future, OMB should

follow long-established procedures with respect to discretionary

spending proposals that require legislative action.
(11)

ITEMS OF SPECIAL INTEREST

HEARINGS

The Subcommittee on Military Construction held hearings on the

fiscal year 2003 budget request during March 2002. The subcommittee heard testimony from representatives of the military

services and defense agencies concerning fiscal year 2003 budget

priorities and base realignment and closure issues.

SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

The budget request for fiscal year 2003 reflects a decrease of

$940,359,000 from the amount enacted in fiscal year 2002.

The Committee recommends an additional $957,959,000 above

the fiscal year 2003 budget request. The total recommended appropriation for fiscal year 2003 is $10,622,000,000, an increase of

$17,600,000 from fiscal year 2002 funding.

The Committee recommendation includes a total of $712,049,000

transferred to military construction accounts from the Defense

Emergency Response Fund (DERF), which was included as part of

the budget submission for the Department of Defense Appropriations bill. The President’s request for DERF military construction

projects totals $716,849,000. This includes $594,384,000 that was

submitted as part of the original request, and an additional

$122,465,000 in DERF military construction requirements that

were identified by the Army subsequent to the submission of the

budget. On the recommendation of the Department of Defense, the

Committee included the entire $716,849,000 as part of the President’s budget request. The Committee concurs with the recommendation of the Department that the military construction

projects in the DERF should be transferred to the Military Construction Appropriations bill, and believes that the entire

$716,849,000 should be treated as part of the President’s budget request.

The Committee is disappointed in the overall levels of the fiscal

year 2003 budget request for military construction. After a promising spike in the request for military construction funding in fiscal

year 2002, the fiscal year 2003 budget request represents a sharp

decline in funding for all accounts with the exception of housing accounts. Particularly hard hit are the Guard and Reserve accounts.

The Committee agrees with the Department that infrastructure is

a key component of readiness and remains concerned about the

condition and adequacy of facilities and infrastructure at U.S. military installations in the United States and overseas. The Committee believes that the fiscal year 2003 budget request did not

adequately address infrastructure requirements, and adjusted its

recommendation accordingly.
12

TRANSFORMATION INITIATIVE

Recognizing the increased requirements that have been placed on

America’s military forces as a result of the global war on terror, the

Committee is recommending the establishment of a transformation

funding initiative to accelerate the transformation and modernization programs of the Army and Air Force. The initiative provides

$100,000,000 to the Army for infrastructure requirements related

to the establishment of Interim Brigade Combat Teams (IBCT) and

$100,000,000 to the Air Force for infrastructure requirements related to the C–17 Air Mobility Modernization Program.

Senior Army officials testified during the Department of Defense

appropriations subcommittee hearings in March that the military

construction funding currently identified for transformation was

not sufficient to meet the Army’s time line for the IBCTs to be

trained and operational. Air Force officials have likewise identified

a potentially serious shortfall in airlift capability.

The war on terror has placed urgent new demands on all elements of the military. Timetables for Army and Air Force transformation developed prior to September 11 are no longer sufficient.

The Committee believes that it is imperative to accelerate the

Army and Air Force transformation programs, and has therefore

provided this funding to meet the infrastructure requirements associated with transformation. The funds are appropriated specifically

to support the infrastructure requirements of the Army’s IBCTs

and the Air Force’s Air Mobility modernization program, including

the beddown of C–17, C–5, and C–130 aircraft. It is the intent of

the Committee that the Army and the Air Force have the discretion

to determine how these funds will be allocated in support of transformation, subject to notification of the congressional defense committees 15 days prior to the obligation of funds.

CONFORMANCE WITH AUTHORIZATION BILL

The Committee strongly supports the authorization-appropriation

process. However, the Committee has reported the appropriation

bill prior to completion of the authorization process. Therefore, the

Committee has provided construction funds for specific projects

which were included in the Senate-reported version of the National

Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2003 and projects subject

to authorization.

REPROGRAMMING RULES/CRITERIA

The following rules apply for all military construction and family

housing reprogrammings. A project or account (including the subelements of an account) which has been specifically reduced by the

Congress in acting on the appropriation request is considered to be

a congressional interest item. A prior approval reprogramming is

required for any increase to an item that has been specifically reduced by the Congress. Accordingly, no below threshold

reprogrammings to an item specifically reduced by the Congress

are permitted.

The reprogramming criteria that apply to military construction

projects (25 percent of the funded amount or $2,000,000 whichever

is less) continue to apply to new housing construction projects and
13

to improvements over $2,000,000. To provide the individual Services the flexibility to proceed with construction contracts without

disruption or delay, the costs associated with environmental hazard

remediation such as asbestos removal, radon abatement, lead-based

paint removal or abatement, and any other legislated environmental hazard remediation may be excluded, provided that such remediation requirements could not be reasonably anticipated at the

time of budget submission. This exclusion applies to projects authorized in the budget year, and also projects authorized in prior

years for which construction contracts have not been completed.

Furthermore, in instances where a prior approval reprogramming request for a project or account has been approved by the

Committee, the amount approved becomes the new base for any future increase or decrease via below threshold reprogrammings (provided that the project or account is not a congressional interest

item).

TRANSFER AUTHORITY

The budget request proposed a general provision which would

allow the transfer of up to $70,000,000 between any accounts in the

bill, and this could be accomplished at the determination of the

Secretary of Defense and upon the approval of OMB. Congress

would be given an ‘‘after the fact’’ notification. The Committee continues to believe that the existing reprogramming procedures are

sufficient in solving urgent, high priority funding problems within

available resources and denies this request.

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE

The Committee has included $645,138,000 for the ‘‘Base realignment and closure’’ account, an increase of $100,000,000 over the

budget request. The additional funding is provided to undertake a

BRAC Environmental Cleanup Acceleration Initiative to address

the backlog of urgent environmental remediation requirements at

bases that have been closed or realigned.

BARRACKS CONSTRUCTION

The fiscal year 2003 budget request includes $1,157,990,000 to

construct or modernize 46 barracks projects.

The Committee recommends $1,150,690,000 for barracks construction projects in fiscal year 2003, a decrease of $7,300,000 from

the budget request.

BARRACKS CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS

Location/Project Request Recommended

Army:

Alaska: Fort Richardson Barracks Complex (144 spaces) ............................................ $21,000,000 $21,000,000

Colorado: Fort Carson Barracks Complex (336 spaces) ............................................... 42,000,000 42,000,000

Georgia: Fort Benning Barracks Complex (492 spaces) ............................................... 45,000,000 45,000,000

Hawaii:

Schofield Barracks Complex (200 spaces) ........................................................... 49,000,000 49,000,000

Schofield Barracks Complex (100 spaces) ........................................................... 42,000,000 42,000,000

Kansas: Fort Riley Barracks Complex (312 spaces) ..................................................... 41,000,000 41,000,000

Kentucky: Fort Campbell Barracks Complex (300 spaces) ........................................... 49,000,000 49,000,000

Maryland: Fort Detrick Barracks Complex (144 spaces) ............................................... 16,000,000 16,000,000
14

BARRACKS CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS—Continued

Location/Project Request Recommended

North Carolina:

Fort Bragg Barracks Complex (336 spaces) ........................................................ 50,000,000 50,000,000

Fort Bragg Barracks Complex (320 spaces) ........................................................ 50,000,000 50,000,000

Texas: Fort Hood Barracks Complex (480 spaces) ........................................................ 45,000,000 45,000,000

Washington: Fort Lewis Barracks Complex (500 spaces) ............................................. 50,000,000 50,000,000

Belgium: Barracks Complex-Chievres (136 spaces) ..................................................... 13,600,000 13,600,000

Germany:

Bamberg Barracks Complex (124 spaces) ........................................................... 10,200,000 10,200,000

Grafenwoehr Brigade Complex-Barracks (179 spaces) ........................................ 13,200,000 13,200,000

Mannheim Barracks Complex (336 spaces) ......................................................... 42,000,000 42,000,000

Italy: Vicenza Barracks Complex (300 spaces) ............................................................. 31,000,000 31,000,000

Korea:

Camp Carroll Barracks Complex (464 spaces) .................................................... 20,000,000 20,000,000

Camp Hovey Barracks Complex (232 spaces) ..................................................... 25,000,000 25,000,000

Camp Humphreys Barracks Complex (400 spaces) ............................................. 36,000,000 36,000,000

Camp Henry Barracks Complex (232 spaces) ...................................................... 10,200,000 10,200,000

K16 Airfield Barracks Complex (464 spaces) ...................................................... 40,000,000 40,000,000

Subtotal, Army .................................................................................................. 741,200,000 741,200,000

Navy:

California:

Camp Pendleton Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (400 spaces) ................................. 23,230,000 23,230,000

Twentynine Palms Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (384 spaces) .............................. 25,770,000 25,770,000

Illinois:

Great Lakes Recruit Barracks (1,056 spaces) ..................................................... 43,360,000 38,360,000

Great Lakes Recruit Barracks (1,056 spaces) ..................................................... 41,740,000 36,740,000

Maryland: Andrews AFB Replacement BQ (120 spaces) ............................................... 9,680,000 9,680,000

Mississippi: Pascagoula Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (100 spaces) ............................. ........................ 10,500,000

Virginia:

Quantico Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (200 spaces) ............................................. 10,280,000 10,280,000

Quantico Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (100 spaces) ............................................. 5,040,000 5,040,000

Yorktown Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (168 spaces) ............................................. 15,020,000 15,020,000

Norfolk Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (500 spaces) ................................................ 37,310,000 37,310,000

Washington: Bremerton Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (264 spaces) ............................... 35,120,000 35,120,000

Greece: Larissa Bachelor Enlisted Quarters & Support Facility (40 spaces) ............... 14,800,000 ........................

Guam: Mariana Island Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (72 spaces) .................................. 13,400,000 13,400,000

Subtotal, Navy & Marine Corps ................................................................................ 274,750,000 260,450,000

Air Force:

Arizona: Davis-Monthan AFB Dormitory (120 spaces) .................................................. 9,110,000 9,110,000

Florida: Hurlburt Field Dormitory (144 spaces) ............................................................. 9,000,000 9,000,000

Louisiana: Barksdale AFB Dormitory (168 spaces) ....................................................... 10,900,000 10,900,000

Mississippi: Keesler AFB Student Dormitory (200 spaces) ........................................... 22,000,000 22,000,000

Nevada: Nellis AFB Dormitory (144 spaces) ................................................................. 12,280,000 12,280,000

New Mexico: Kirtland AFB Visiting Officers/Airmen Quarters (96 spaces) ................... ........................ 8,400,000

North Carolina: Pope AFB Dormitory (144 spaces) ....................................................... 9,700,000 9,700,000

Texas:

Lackland AFB Student Dormitory (200 spaces) ................................................... 18,500,000 18,500,000

Sheppard AFB Dormitory (144 spaces) ................................................................ 10,000,000 10,000,000

Ohio: Wright-Patterson AFB Dormitory (144 spaces) .................................................... 10,400,000 ........................

Virginia: Langley AFB Dormitory (96 spaces) ................................................................ 8,320,000 8,320,000

Korea: Osan AB Dormitory (156 spaces) ....................................................................... 15,100,000 15,100,000

Subtotal, Air Force ..................................................................................................... 135,310,000 133,310,000

Reserve Components:

Naval Reserve:

Georgia: Atlanta Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (92 spaces) ................................... 6,730,000 6,730,000

Air Force Reserve:

New York: Niagara Falls Air Reserve Station, Visiting Officers Quarters, Phase

1 (300 spaces) ................................................................................................. ........................ 9,000,000
15

BARRACKS CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS—Continued

Location/Project Request Recommended

Subtotal, Reserve Components .................................................................... 6,730,000 15,730,000

REAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE REPORTING REQUIREMENT

The Committee recommends a continuation of the following general rules for repairing a facility under Operations and Maintenance account funding:

Components of the facility may be repaired by replacement, and

such replacement can be up to current standards or code.

Interior arrangements and restorations may be included as repair, but additions, new facilities, and functional conversions must

be performed as military construction projects.

Such projects may be done concurrent with repair projects, as

long as the final conjunctively funded project is a complete and usable facility.

The appropriate Service Secretary shall submit a 21-day notification prior to carrying out any repair project with an estimated cost

in excess of $7,500,000.

The Department is directed to continue to provide the real property maintenance backlog at all installations for which there is a

requested construction project in future budget requests. This information is to be provided on Form 1390. In addition, for all troop

housing requests, the Form 1391 is to continue to show all real

property maintenance conducted in the past 2 years and all future

requirements for unaccompanied housing at that installation.

CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS

The fiscal year 2003 budget request includes $10,700,000 for two

child development center projects. The Committee recommends

$25,730,000 for a total of four projects.

The following child development center projects are provided for

fiscal year 2003:

Location Request Recommended

Army:

Kentucky: Ft. Knox .......................................................................................................... ........................ $6,800,000

Germany: Bamberg ......................................................................................................... $7,000,000 7,000,000

Italy: Vicenza .................................................................................................................. 3,700,000 3,700,000

Navy/Marine Corps: California: Camp Pendleton ................................................................... ........................ 8,230,000

Total ........................................................................................................................... 10,700,000 25,730,000

FOREIGN CURRENCY SAVINGS

The following table reflects foreign currency savings identified by

the Department of Defense. The Committee recommends reductions

to the specific appropriations identified in the table in those

amounts, for a total of $44,627,000.

Account Amount

Military Construction:

Army ................................................................................................ ¥$13,676,000

Navy ................................................................................................. ¥1,340,000

Air Force .......................................................................................... ¥10,281,000
16

Account Amount

Defense-wide ................................................................................... ¥2,976,000

Family Housing, Army ................................................................... ¥4,920,000

Family Housing, Navy ................................................................... ¥2,652,000

Family Housing, Air Force ............................................................. ¥8,782,000

Total ............................................................................................. ¥44,627,000
(17)

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, ARMY

Appropriations, 2002 ............................................................................. $1,762,556,000

Budget estimate, 2003 ........................................................................... 1,672,903,000

Committee recommendation (including rescission) ............................. 1,665,536,000

The Committee recommends $1,665,536,000 for the Army for fiscal year 2003. This is a decrease of $7,367,000 from the budget request for fiscal year 2003. This also reflects the realignment of the

Chemical Demilitarization Program responsibility from the Army.

(See State tables at the end of the report for complete program recommendations.)

The Committee fully expects contracts for the following projects

to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2003 as practical:

Training & UAV Maintenance Support Facility, Donnelly Training Area, AK.—Of the funds provided for planning and design within the ‘‘Army’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than

$1,500,000 be made available for the design of this facility.

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) First Responder Training

Facility, Fort Leonard Wood, MO.—Of the funds provided for planning and design within the ‘‘Army’’ account, the Committee directs

that $500,000 be made available for the design of this facility. Additionally, the Committee agrees that this project addresses an urgent, mission critical, and homeland security requirement and

strongly encourages the Army to advance this project into the fiscal

year 2004 budget request.

Storage Igloo Upgrade, Letterkenny Depot, PA.—Of the funds provided for planning and design within the ‘‘Army’’ account, the Committee directs that $390,000 be made available for the design of

this facility.

Vehicle Maintenance Facility, Camp Bullis, TX.—Of the funds

provided for planning and design within the ‘‘Army’’ account, the

Committee directs that not less than $900,000 be made available

for the design of this facility.

Military Police Emergency Vehicle Storage Facility, Fort Wainwright, AK.—Of the funds provided for unspecified minor construction within the ‘‘Army’’ account, the Committee directs that not less

than $1,500,000 be made available for the construction of this facility.

Military Police Emergency Vehicle Storage Facility, Fort Richardson, AK.—Of the funds provided for unspecified minor construction

within the ‘‘Army’’ account, the Committee directs that not less

than $1,500,000 be made available for the construction of this facility.

Kinetic Energy Missile Complex, White Sands Missile Range,

NM.—Of the funds provided for unspecified minor construction

within the ‘‘Army’’ account, the Committee directs that $1,500,000

be made available for the construction of this facility.
18

Training Facility, Corpus Christi Army Depot, TX.—Of the funds

provided for unspecified minor construction within the ‘‘Army’’ account, the Committee directs that $925,000 be made available for

the construction of this facility.

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, NAVY

Appropriations, 2002 ............................................................................. $1,126,633,000

Budget estimate, 2003 ........................................................................... 1,105,391,000

Committee recommendation (including rescission) ............................. 1,215,303,000

The Committee recommends $1,215,303,000 for Navy and Marine

Corps military construction for fiscal year 2003. This amount is an

increase of $109,912,000 from the fiscal year 2003 budget request.

(See State tables at the end of the report for complete program recommendations.)

The Committee fully expects contracts for the following projects

to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2003 as practical:

Base Main Entrance & Gate, Naval Air Station, North Island,

CA.—Of the funds provided for planning and design within the

‘‘Navy’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than $410,000

be made available for the design of this project.

Replace Fuel Farm, NAS Kingsville, TX.—Of the funds provided

for planning and design within the ‘‘Navy’’ account, the Committee

directs that not less than $1,000,000 be made available for the design of this project.

Force Protection Facility, Naval Air Station Corpus Christi, TX.—

Of the funds provided for unspecified minor construction within the

‘‘Navy’’ account, the Committee directs that $1,450,000 be made

available for the construction of this facility.

UAV Facility, Fallon Naval Air Station, NV.—Of the funds provided for unspecified minor construction within the ‘‘Navy’’ account,

the Committee directs that $1,475,000 be made available for the

construction of this facility.

Aircraft Prototype Facility, Patuxent River, MD.—The Committee

provided $1,450,000 within the ‘‘Navy’’ account for the planning

and design of this facility in fiscal year 2002. Due to recent base

consolidations, Patuxent Naval Air Station is the only installation

capable of conducting air combat survivability enhancement programs that are critical to national security. The Committee supports the construction of this facility and strongly urges the Navy

to complete the planning and design as expeditiously as possible,

and to fund the construction of this project in the President’s fiscal

year 2004 budget.

Turner Field House, U.S. Naval Academy, MD.—The Committee

recognizes that physical fitness is a key component of the comprehensive training programs at military academies. Last year, the

Committee provided $2,700,000 for planning and design within the

‘‘Navy’’ account for the Turner Field House to address a critical

shortage of indoor physical education space at the U.S. Naval Academy. The Committee urges the Navy to complete the planning and

design of this facility as quickly as possible, and to advance the

project into the President’s fiscal year 2004 budget.
19

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, AIR FORCE

Appropriations, 2002 ............................................................................. $1,237,580,000

Budget estimate, 2003 ........................................................................... 834,687,000

Committee recommendation (including rescission) ............................. 1,165,336,000

The Committee recommends $1,165,336,000 for the Air Force in

fiscal year 2003. This is an increase of $330,649,000 from the fiscal

year 2003 budget request. (See State tables at the end of the report

for complete program recommendations.)

The Committee fully expects contracts for the following projects

to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2003 as practical:

Wide-Body Aircraft Hangar, Elmendorf AFB, AK.—Of the funds

provided for planning and design within the ‘‘Air Force’’ account,

the Committee directs that not less than $2,700,000 be made available for the design of this facility.

Replace C–5 Squadron Operations Facility/Aircraft Maintenance

Unit, Travis AFB, CA.—Of the funds provided for planning and design within the ‘‘Air Force’’ account, the Committee directs that not

less than $864,000 be made available for the design of this facility.

The Committee notes that this critical project was within the scope

of the Air Force’s fiscal year 2002 Future Years Defense Plan, and

urges the Air Force to advance the project into the President’s fiscal year 2004 budget so that it can be undertaken without further

delay.

Control Tower, Dover Air Force Base, DE.—Of the funds provided

for planning and design within the ‘‘Air Force’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than $675,000 be made available for

the design of this facility.

B–1B Centralized Intermediate Repair Facility, McConnell AFB,

KS.—The Committee notes the additional capacity the 184th Air

Refueling Wing at McConnell Air Force Base may need as it prepares to take on more B–1B engine repair workload consistent with

the agreement reached last year between the State of Kansas and

the Air Force concerning the B–1B consolidation and reduction initiative. B–1B propulsion work is currently performed in four separate buildings, resulting in the loss of over 10,000 man hours and

lost production of 33 engines per year. Accordingly, the Committee

urges the Air National Guard and the Air Force to include the B–

1B Centralized Intermediate Repair Facility (CIRF) in the fiscal

year 2004 Military Construction Budget Request.

Fire/Crash Rescue Station/Control Tower, Otis ANG, MA.—Of

the funds provided for planning and design within the ‘‘Air National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that $1,700,000 be

made available for the design of this facility.

Tri-Service Research Facility, Brooks AFB, TX.—Of the funds

provided for planning and design within the ‘‘Air Force’’ account,

the Committee directs that $1,000,000 be made available for the

design of this facility.

Railroad Crossing Gates, Laughlin AFB, TX.—Of the funds provided for unspecified minor construction within the ‘‘Air Force’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than $220,000 be made

available for the construction of this project.

Replace & Bury Electrical Infrastructure, Lackland AFB, TX.—Of

the funds provided for unspecified minor construction within the
20

‘‘Air Force’’ account, the Committee directs that $900,000 be made

available for the construction of this project.

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, DEFENSE-WIDE

Appropriations, 2002 ............................................................................. $806,278,000

Budget estimate, 2003 ........................................................................... 771,835,000

Committee recommendation (including rescissions) ........................... 924,266,000

The Committee recommends $924,266,000 for projects considered

within the ‘‘Defense-wide’’ account. The amount recommended is an

increase of $152,431,000 from the fiscal year 2003 budget request.

This increase reflects the realignment of the Chemical Demilitarization Program responsibility to this appropriation. (See State

tables at the end of the report for complete program recommendations.)

CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION

The budget request identified a requirement of $167,631,000 for

the construction of chemical weapons demilitarization facilities in

fiscal year 2003. The Committee recommends a total of

$159,250,000 for this program. The Committee is aware of ongoing

efforts by the Department of Defense to accelerate the destruction

of chemical agents and weapons in order to enhance the safety of

the American public and comply with the requirements of the

Chemical Weapons Convention. The Committee encourages the Defense Department to continue to explore innovative and cost-saving

procedures to accelerate the process of destroying these weapons

and agents while maintaining stringent public and environmental

safety standards.

In the aftermath of September 11, the protection of chemical

weapons stockpiles has required the call up of approximately 1,000

National Guard troops to protect chemical weapons facilities in the

United States. In addition to putting a strain on National Guard

resources, the call up of these forces underscores the potential vulnerability of these sites to terrorist attack. It will be to the benefit

of the Nation to complete the chemical demilitarization program as

quickly as possible, and ahead of schedule if at all possible.

The Committee is particularly supportive of the Department’s

initiative to speed up the neutralization of stockpiled chemical

agents at Aberdeen, Maryland, and Newport, Indiana. If executed

as planned, the neutralization initiative could be completed at Aberdeen in September 2003, a full 43 months ahead of schedule and

at a cost avoidance of $216,000,000. At Newport, the neutralization

initiative could be completed as early as March 2004, 57 months

ahead of schedule at an estimated cost avoidance of $530,000,000.

The Department is currently awaiting guidance, dependent on the

availability of supplemental funding, as to whether it will be able

to proceed this summer with the neutralization initiative at Aberdeen and Newport. If the neutralization program goes forward, the

Department may not require the completion of the chemical agent

destruction facilities currently under construction at Aberdeen and

Newport, and therefore would not require the same allocation of

military construction funds as requested in the fiscal year 2003

budget. For this reason, the Committee is recommending a non-
21

prejudicial 5 percent across-the-board reduction in funding for the

fiscal year 2003 chemical demilitarization program, with the intention of reevaluating program requirements during conference with

the House.

Substantial investment has already been made in facilities at

Newport and Aberdeen. If these structures are not needed for

chemical demilitarization, the Committee expects the Department

to maintain them until they can be converted to usable facilities.

To this end, the Committee directs the Department to provide a report to the congressional defense committees no later than January

30, 2003, on alternative uses for the Aberdeen and Newport facilities if they are no longer required for chemical demilitarization.

State/installation/project Request Recommended

Arkansas: Pine Bluff Arsenal, Ammunition Demolition Shop ......................................................... $18,937,000 $17,990,000

Colorado: Pueblo Depot Ammunition Demilitarization Facility Ph 4 .............................................. 38,000,000 36,100,000

Indiana: Newport Army Ammunition Plant, Ammunition Demilitarization Facility Ph 5 ............... 61,494,000 58,420,000

Kentucky:

Blue Grass Army Depot, Ammunition Demilitarization Facility Ph 3 .................................... 10,300,000 9,785,000

Blue Grass Army Depot, Ammunition Demilitarization Support Ph 3 ................................... 8,300,000 7,885,000

Maryland: Aberdeen Proving Ground Ammunition Demilitarization Facility Ph 5 .......................... 30,600,000 29,070,000

Total ................................................................................................................................... 167,631,000 159,250,000

The budget request proposes that these amounts should be appropriated under the ‘‘Military Construction, Army’’ account. As in

prior years, the Committee recommends that these amounts be appropriated under the ‘‘Military Construction, Defense-wide’’ account, in order to facilitate the tracking of expenses for the Chemical Demilitarization Program, and to avoid distorting the size of

the Army’s military construction program.

The Committee believes that the focus on this program must remain at the Office of the Secretary of the Defense rather than at

the service level and directs the Department to submit the fiscal

year 2004 budget accordingly.

The following chart displays the scope of the military construction investment in the overall chemical demilitarization program:

CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION PROGRAM MILITARY CONSTRUCTION COSTS

[In millions of dollars]

2001

and

prior

Fiscal year—

Total

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Tooele ....................................................... 198.0 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 198.0

Anniston ................................................... 189.0 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 189.0

Umatilla Depot ......................................... 11.2 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 11.2

Umatilla Facility ....................................... 191.6 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 191.6

Pine Bluff Fixed Facility ........................... ............ ............ 18.0 ............ ............ ............ ............ 18.0

Pine Bluff Depot ....................................... 10.0 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 10.0

Pine Bluff Facility .................................... 151.4 26.0 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 177.4

Pueblo Depot ............................................ 6.3 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 6.3

Pueblo Facility .......................................... 10.7 11.0 36.1 105.2 66.0 30.1 ............ 259.1

Blue Grass Depot ..................................... 2.7 ............ 7.9 ............ ............ ............ ............ 10.6

Blue Grass Facility ................................... ............ 3.0 9.8 71.5 59.6 65.4 51.8 261.1

Aberdeen CTDF ......................................... 16.1 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 16.1

Aberdeen Depot ........................................ 1.9 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 1.9

Aberdeen Facility ...................................... 125.7 61.5 29.1 ............ ............ ............ ............ 216.3

Newport Depot .......................................... 2.0 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 2.0

Newport Facility ........................................ 81.8 61.0 58.4 11.0 54.9 20.1 1.9 289.1
22

CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION PROGRAM MILITARY CONSTRUCTION COSTS—Continued

[In millions of dollars]

2001

and

prior

Fiscal year— Total 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

MAPS 1 Facility ......................................... 3.1 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 3.1

Planning & Design ................................... 114.5 15.0 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 129.5

Total ............................................ 1,116.0 177.5 159.3 187.7 180.5 115.6 53.7 1,990.3

1MAPS (NSCMP) Munitions Assessment and Processing System (Non-Stockpile Chemical Material Program).

MEDICAL CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

The fiscal year 2003 budget request includes $164,741,000 for

four major construction projects plus planning and design, unspecified minor construction, and contractor claims to provide hospital

and medical facilities. The Committee recommends a total of

$169,741,000, which fully funds the budget request and provides

additional planning and design funding.

Location/project title Request Recommended

Alaska: Ft. Wainwright, Hospital Replacement (Phase IV) .................................................... $53,000,000 $53,000,000

Hawaii: Hickam AFB, Life Skills Clinic Replacement ............................................................. 2,700,000 2,700,000

Germany: Spangdahlem, Hospital Replacement .................................................................... 39,629,000 39,629,000

Italy: Naples Medical/Dental Facility Replacement ................................................................ 41,449,000 41,449,000

Total ........................................................................................................................... 136,778,000 136,778,000

Biomedical Center, Tripler Army Hospital, Honolulu, HI.—Of the

funds provided for planning and design within the ‘‘Defense-wide

Tricare Management Activity’’ account, the Committee directs that

not less than $2,000,000 be made available for the design of this

facility.

Health Clinic, Grafenwoehr, Germany.—Of the funds provided for

planning and design within the ‘‘Defense-wide, Tricare Management Activity’’ account, the Committee directs that $1,000,000 be

made available for planning and design to expand and alter the existing facility at Grafenwoehr to accommodate the Army’s Efficient

Basing East initiative.

INTELLIGENCE UPGRADES

The Committee is aware that the Department of Defense, Office

of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence, is conducting an ongoing assessment

of U.S. intelligence gathering capabilities and requirements. The

events of September 11 have placed added emphasis on the urgency and importance of this assessment. Preliminary study results

have identified a serious shortfall in the future data archiving capability associated with U.S. Measurement and Signature Intelligence. The study indicates that a distributed data archiving capability is needed to address this shortfall. Such capability would provide data backup protection and allow for improved cross-disciplinary and trend analysis. This capability would complement and enhance the missions of existing Measurement and Signature Intelligence centers in the United States by providing enhanced

archiving and networking capability. Preliminary results of the as-
23

sessment indicate that a backup data archiving facility as well as

equipment and infrastructure upgrades at existing centers could

address the anticipated shortfall in capability. The study is scheduled to be completed on August 15, 2002. Because of the new demands placed on the Nation’s intelligence gathering resources as a

result of the events of September 11, the Committee believes that

the Department of Defense should have the resources available to

move forward immediately with planning and design for needed

upgrades if the final conclusions of the assessment bear out the

preliminary findings. To avoid unnecessary delay pending completion of the study, the Committee has reserved $2,000,000 within

the ‘‘Defense-wide planning and design, undistributed’’ account to

be available immediately for planning and design if the study determines that such intelligence upgrades are needed.

CONTINGENCY CONSTRUCTION

The Committee has provided $10,000,000 for the Secretary of Defense ‘‘Contingency construction’’ account in accordance with the

budget request. This account provides funds which may be used by

the Secretary of Defense for unforeseen facility requirements. The

Committee believes that the funding provided in the account is

adequate to meet the needs of the Department.

ENERGY CONSERVATION INVESTMENT PROGRAM

The Committee recommends the full budget request of

$49,531,000 for the Energy Conservation Investment Program

(ECIP).

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, RESERVE COMPONENTS

Appropriations, 2002 ............................................................................. $953,103,000

Budget estimate, 2003 ........................................................................... 319,427,000

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 609,837,000

The Committee recommends $609,837,000 for military construction projects for the Guard and Reserve components. This amount

is $290,410,000 above the fiscal year 2003 budget request. This increase reflects the Committee’s continued strong support for the

Guard and Reserve.

The Committee’s recommended action on each Reserve component project is reflected in the State list at the end of this report.

The Committee recommends approval of military construction,

Reserve component as outlined in the following table:

RESERVE COMPONENT

Component Request Recommended

Army National Guard ............................................................................................................... $101,595,000 $208,482,000

Air National Guard .................................................................................................................. 62,406,000 217,988,000

Army Reserve ........................................................................................................................... 58,779,000 66,487,000

Naval Reserve ......................................................................................................................... 58,671,000 58,671,000

Air Force Reserve .................................................................................................................... 37,976,000 58,209,000

Total ........................................................................................................................... 319,427,000 609,837,000
24

The Committee has added funding for specific Reserve component planning and design initiatives. The Committee recommendation also provides additional funding over the budget request for

minor construction activities for the Reserve components.

The Committee fully expects contracts for the following projects

to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2003 as practical:

Readiness Center, Bethel, AK.—Of the funds provided for planning and design within the ‘‘Army National Guard’’ account, the

Committee directs that $500,000 be made available for the design

of this facility.

Readiness Center, New Haven, CT.—Of the funds provided for

planning and design within the ‘‘Army National Guard’’ account,

the Committee directs that not less than $1,400,000 be made available for the design of this facility.

Joint Readiness Center, Haleyville, AL.—Of the funds provided

for planning and design within the ‘‘Army National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that $1,100,000 be made available for

the design of this facility.

Relocation of Hawaii Army National Guard, Barbers Point Naval

Air Station, HI.—Of the funds provided for planning and design

within the ‘‘Army National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs

that not less than $2,000,000 be made available for the design of

these facilities.

Readiness Center, Clarksdale, MS.—Of the funds provided for

planning and design within the ‘‘Army National Guard’’ account,

the Committee directs that $300,000 be made available for the design of this facility.

Readiness Center, St. Peters, MO.—Of the funds provided for

planning and design within the ‘‘Army National Guard’’ account,

the Committee directs that $500,000 be made available for the design of this facility.

AVCRAD, Aviation Classification Repair Activity Depot, Springfield, MO.—Of the funds provided for planning and design within

the ‘‘Army National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that

$1,200,000 be made available for the design of this facility.

MATES—Equipment Maintenance Site, Fort Drum, NY.—Of the

funds provided for planning and design within the ‘‘Army National

Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that $1,527,000 be made

available for the design of this facility.

Readiness Center, Henderson, NV.—Of the funds provided for

planning and design within the ‘‘Army National Guard’’ account,

the Committee directs that not less than $850,000 be made available for the design of this facility.

Barracks, Chillicothe, OH.—Of the funds provided for minor construction within the ‘‘Army National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that $1,497,000 be made available for the construction of this facility.

Readiness Center STARC, Rapid City, SD.—Of the funds provided for planning and design within the ‘‘Army National Guard’’

account, the Committee directs that not less than $1,200,000 be

made available for the design of this facility.

Organizational Maintenance Shop Consolidation, Pierre, SD.—Of

the funds provided for planning and design within the ‘‘Army Na-
25

tional Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than

$300,000 be made available for the design of this facility.

Federal Scout Readiness Centers, Alakanuk, Quinhagak, &

Kwigillingok, AK.—Of the funds provided for unspecified minor

construction within the ‘‘Army National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that $1,500,000 be made available for the construction of these facilities.

Post Engineer Maintenance Facility, Ft. Harrison, MT.—Of the

funds provided for unspecified minor construction within the ‘‘Army

National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that $1,473,000 be

made available for the construction of this facility.

Weapons of Mass Destruction/Civil Support Teams.—Of the

funds provided for unspecified minor construction within the ‘‘Army

National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than

$2,500,000 be made available for construction to support the completion of the WMD/CST facilities.

Armed Forces Reserve Center/Organizational Maintenance Shop,

Bedford, Hanscom AFB, MA.—Of the funds provided for planning

and design within the ‘‘Army Reserve’’ account, the Committee directs that $2,568,000 be made available for the design of this facility.

Armed Forces Reserve Center, Eau Claire, WI.—Of the funds provided for planning and design within the ‘‘Army Reserve’’ account,

the Committee directs that $927,000 be made available for the design of this facility.

Replace Pararescue Training Complex, Kulis ANG Base, AK.—Of

the funds provided for planning and design within the ‘‘Air National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than

$700,000 be made available for the design of this facility.

Munitions Complex, Gulfport, MS.—Of the funds provided for

planning and design within the ‘‘Air National Guard’’ account, the

Committee directs that $700,000 be made available for the design

of these facilities.

Security Complex, Reno, NV.—Of the funds provided for planning

and design within the ‘‘Air National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that $900,000 be made available for the design of

these facilities.

C–5 Support Facilities, Martinsburg Air National Guard Base,

WV.—Of the funds provided for planning and design within the

‘‘Air National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that not less

than $3,000,000 be made available for the design of these facilities.

Warehouse 912 Renovation, Lackland AFB, TX.—Of the funds

provided for unspecified minor construction within the ‘‘Air Force

Reserve’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than

$800,000 be made available for the renovation of this facility.

Multiple Threat Emitter System (MUTES) Facility, Smoky Hill

Range, KS.—Of the funds provided for unspecified minor construction within the ‘‘Air National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that $1,000,000 be made available for the construction of this

facility.

Bachelor Officer/Enlisted Quarters, Fort Meade, SD.—Of the

funds provided for unspecified minor construction within the ‘‘Army

National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that $1,500,000 be

made available for the construction of these quarters.
26

Ammunition Supply Point, Camp Grafton, ND.—Of the funds

provided for unspecified minor construction within the ‘‘Army National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that $1,499,000 be

made available for the construction of this facility.

NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION SECURITY INVESTMENT

PROGRAM

Appropriations, 2002 ............................................................................. $162,600,000

Budget estimate, 2003 ........................................................................... 168,200,000

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 168,200,000

The Committee has provided $168,200,000 for the North Atlantic

Treaty Organization [NATO] Security Investment Program for fiscal year 2003, fully funding the budget request.

The Committee continues the requirement that no funds will be

used for projects (including planning and design) related to the enlargement of NATO and the Partnership for Peace program, unless

Congress is notified 21 days in advance of the obligation of funds.

In addition, the Committee’s intent is that section 122 of the General Provisions shall apply to this program.

The Department of Defense is directed to identify separately the

level of effort anticipated for NATO enlargement and for Partnership for Peace for that fiscal year in future budget justifications.

NATO INFRASTRUCTURE

The Committee is concerned about the recent increase in the

number and levels of headquarters associated with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). The military command structure now consists of three levels of commands-strategic, regional

and sub-regional. The Committee recently learned that NATO

plans to spend over a half billion dollars to upgrade and modernize

these military command headquarters. This places a tremendous financial burden on the NATO Security Investment Program (NSIP)

as well as the U.S. military services which must provide supporting

personnel and funding for associated barracks, family housing and

quality of life facilities at each of these headquarters. These military construction projects compete directly with projects that support U.S. missions at home and overseas. Accordingly, the Committee recommends that proposed funding for three U.S. projects

relating to the sub-regional NATO headquarters in Madrid, Spain

and Larrisa, Greece not be approved.

KOREA LAND PARTNERSHIP PLAN

The Committee supports the Department’s efforts to consolidate

its presence in the Republic of Korea and align installations with

future requirements. The Korea Land Partnership Plan (LPP) appears to offer a strategy to help reduce U.S. military infrastructure.

However, the Committee continues to be concerned about several

aspects of the plan, which commits both the Department of Defense

and Government of South Korea to make major infrastructure investments over many years. For example, the plan calls for significantly increasing the number of accompanied tours in South Korea.

Further, the Committee understands that there are land exchanges

currently under consideration, which fall outside the LPP. The plan
27

also does not address potential force structure changes that might

be envisioned over the next 10 years and their impact on overall

infrastructure requirements.

The Committee requests that the General Accounting Office review the LPP to provide the Congress with a better understanding

of the plan, associated costs, burden sharing implications and other

related factors that may not be addressed in the plan. This report

should be provided to the congressional defense committees not

later than March 15, 2003.

FAMILY HOUSING OVERVIEW

The Committee has provided $4,228,384,000 for family housing

construction, operations and maintenance, and the Department’s

family housing improvement fund. This amount is $18,076,000

below the fiscal year 2003 budget request and $132,645,000 above

the amount appropriated in fiscal year 2002.

FAMILY HOUSING, ARMY

Appropriations, 2002 ............................................................................. $1,402,315,000

Budget estimate, 2003 ........................................................................... 1,402,353,000

Committee recommendation (including rescission) ............................. 1,396,943,000

The Committee recommends a total of $1,396,943,000 for family

housing, Army, in fiscal year 2003. This is $5,410,000 below the fiscal year 2003 budget request.

CONSTRUCTION

The Committee recommends $27,452,000 for new construction, as

shown below:

Location/project Request Recommended

Alaska: Fort Wainwright (38 units) ........................................................................................ $17,752,000 $17,752,000

Arizona: Yuma Proving Ground (33 units) ............................................................................. 6,100,000 6,100,000

Germany: Stuttgart (1 unit) .................................................................................................... 990,000 500,000

Korea, Yongsan (10 units) ...................................................................................................... 3,100,000 3,100,000

Total ........................................................................................................................... 27,942,000 27,452,000

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS

The following projects are to be accomplished within the amounts

provided for construction improvements:

Location/project Requested Recommended

Hawaii: Schofield Barracks/Fort Shafter (8,178 units) Privatization ..................................... $21,000,000 $21,000,000

Louisiana: Fort Polk (3,648 units) Privatization .................................................................... 64,000,000 64,000,000

Missouri: Fort Leonard Wood (2,472 units) Privatization ....................................................... 45,000,000 45,000,000

New York: West Point (54 units) ............................................................................................ 10,800,000 10,800,000

Pennsylvania: Carlisle Barracks (36 units) ............................................................................ 4,200,000 4,200,000

Virginia:

Fort Belvoir (2,070 units) Privatization ......................................................................... 8,700,000 8,700,000

Forts Eustis/Fort Story (1,115 units) Privatization ........................................................ 14,800,000 14,800,000

Germany:

Darmstadt (48 units) ..................................................................................................... 4,200,000 4,200,000

Heidelberg (75 units) ..................................................................................................... 12,151,000 12,151,000

Mannheim (72 units) ..................................................................................................... 10,400,000 10,400,000

Mannheim (60 units) ..................................................................................................... 10,000,000 10,000,000

Schweinfurt (234 units) ................................................................................................. 7,600,000 7,600,000
28

Location/project Requested Recommended

Stuttgart (72 units) ....................................................................................................... 9,900,000 9,900,000

Vilseck (36 units) .......................................................................................................... 3,900,000 3,900,000

Wuerzberg (136 units) ................................................................................................... 11,200,000 11,200,000

Korea: Yongsan (8 units) ........................................................................................................ 1,900,000 1,900,000

Total ........................................................................................................................... 239,751,000 239,751,000

FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS

Appropriations, 2002 ............................................................................. $1,241,875,000

Budget estimate, 2003 ........................................................................... 1,243,488,000

Committee recommendation (including rescission) ............................. 1,239,604,000

The Committee recommends $1,239,604,000 for family housing,

Navy and Marine Corps, in fiscal year 2003. This amount is

$3,884,000 below the fiscal year 2003 budget request.

CONSTRUCTION

The Committee recommends $223,719,000 for new construction,

as shown below:

Location/project Requested Recommended

California:

Lemoore (178 units) Alvarez Village, Phase VII & VIII ................................................. $40,981,000 $40,981,000

Twentynine Palms (76 units) ......................................................................................... 19,425,000 19,425,000

Connecticut: New London (100 units) Polaris Park ............................................................... 24,415,000 24,415,000

Florida: Mayport Commanders Quarters (1 unit) ................................................................... 329,000 329,000

Hawaii: Kaneohe Bay (65 units) ............................................................................................. 24,797,000 24,797,000

Mississippi: Meridian (56 units) Juniper Ridge ..................................................................... 9,755,000 9,755,000

North Carolina: Camp Lejeune (317 units) ............................................................................ 43,650,000 43,650,000

Virginia: Quantico (290 units) ................................................................................................ 41,843,000 41,843,000

Greece: Larissa (2 units) ........................................................................................................ 1,232,000 ........................

United Kingdom: St. Mawgan (62 units) ............................................................................... 18,524,000 18,524,000

Total ........................................................................................................................... 224,951,000 223,719,000

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS

The following projects are to be accomplished within the amounts

provided for construction improvements:

Location/project Requested Recommended

Arizona: MCAS Yuma (121 units) ........................................................................................... $12,499,000 $12,499,000

California:

Monterey (193 units) ..................................................................................................... 18,399,000 18,399,000

Ventura (215 units) Santa Rosa/Santa Cruz ................................................................ 19,605,000 19,605,000

Washington, DC:

Bethesda (1 unit) Quarters B ........................................................................................ 4,000 4,000

Bethesda (1 unit) Quarters E ........................................................................................ 5,000 5,000

Naval Observatory (1 unit) Quarters F .......................................................................... 38,000 38,000

Hawaii: Pearl Harbor (1,392 units) Privatization ................................................................... 33,382,000 33,382,000

Louisiana: New Orleans (1 unit) Quarters D .......................................................................... 32,000 32,000

Maryland: Thurmont (1 unit) Cedar ....................................................................................... 109,000 109,000

Nevada: Fallon (1 unit) 150 May Ranch ................................................................................ 96,000 96,000

South Carolina: Charleston (300 units) ................................................................................. 22,900,000 22,900,000

Virginia:

Hampton Roads (1 unit) Quarters F–33W .................................................................... 123,000 123,000

Hampton Roads (1 unit) Quarters G–8 ......................................................................... 52,000 52,000

Hampton Roads (1 unit) Quarters G–28 ....................................................................... 61,000 61,000

Guam: (102 units) New Apra, Phase II .................................................................................. 16,208,000 16,208,000

Iceland: Keflavik (1 unit) Bldg. 627 ...................................................................................... 689,000 689,000
29

Location/project Requested Recommended

Italy: Naples (1 unit) Villa Nike ............................................................................................. 28,000 28,000

Japan:

Yokosuka (129 units) Townhouses, Phase III ................................................................ 12,184,000 12,184,000

MCAS Iwakuni (44 units) ............................................................................................... 1,527,000 1,527,000

MCAS Iwakuni (44 units) ............................................................................................... 1,527,000 1,527,000

Total ........................................................................................................................... 139,468,000 139,468,000

FAMILY HOUSING, AIR FORCE

Appropriations, 2002 ............................................................................. $1,395,418,000

Budget estimate, 2003 ........................................................................... 1,550,744,000

Committee recommendation (including rescission) ............................. 1,541,962,000

The Committee recommends $1,541,962,000 for family housing,

Air Force, in fiscal year 2003, which is $8,782,000 below the budget

request.

CONSTRUCTION

The Committee recommends $416,438,000 for new construction,

as requested, as shown below:

Location/project Requested Recommended

Arizona: Luke AFB (140 units) ................................................................................................ $18,954,000 $18,954,000

California: Travis AFB (110 units) ......................................................................................... 24,320,000 24,320,000

Colorado:

USAF Academy (71 units) .............................................................................................. 12,424,000 12,424,000

Peterson AFB (2 units) .................................................................................................. 959,000 959,000

Delaware: Dover AFB (112 units) ........................................................................................... 19,615,000 19,615,000

Florida:

Eglin AFB (134 units) .................................................................................................... 15,906,000 15,906,000

Eglin AFB Housing office ............................................................................................... 597,000 597,000

MacDill AFB (96 units) .................................................................................................. 18,086,000 18,086,000

Hawaii: Hickam AFB (96 units) .............................................................................................. 29,050,000 29,050,000

Idaho: Mountain Home AFB (95 units) ................................................................................... 24,392,000 24,392,000

Kansas: McConnell AFB Housing Maintenance ...................................................................... 1,514,000 1,514,000

Maryland:

Andrews AFB (53 units) ................................................................................................. 9,838,000 9,838,000

Andrews AFB (52 units) ................................................................................................. 8,807,000 8,807,000

Missouri: Whiteman AFB (22 units) ....................................................................................... 3,977,000 3,977,000

Mississippi:

Columbus AFB Housing office ....................................................................................... 412,000 412,000

Keesler AFB (117 units) ................................................................................................. 16,505,000 16,505,000

Montana: Malmstrom AFB (18 units) ..................................................................................... 4,717,000 4,717,000

North Carolina:

Pope AFB Housing Maintenance .................................................................................... 991,000 991,000

Seymour Johnson AFB (126 units) ................................................................................. 18,615,000 18,615,000

North Dakota:

Grand Forks AFB (150 units) ......................................................................................... 30,140,000 30,140,000

Minot AFB (112 units) ................................................................................................... 21,428,000 21,428,000

Minot AFB (102 units) ................................................................................................... 20,315,000 20,315,000

New Mexico: Holloman AFB (101 units) ................................................................................. 20,161,000 20,161,000

Oklahoma: Vance AFB (59 units) ........................................................................................... 11,423,000 11,423,000

South Dakota:

Ellsworth AFB (22 units) ............................................................................................... 4,794,000 4,794,000

Ellsworth AFB Housing Maintenance ............................................................................. 447,000 447,000

Texas:

Dyess AFB (85 units) ..................................................................................................... 14,824,000 14,824,000

Randolph AFB (112 units) ............................................................................................. 14,311,000 14,311,000

Randolph AFB Housing Maintenance ............................................................................ 447,000 447,000

Virginia: Langley AFB Housing office ..................................................................................... 1,193,000 1,193,000

Germany: Ramstein AFB (19 units) ........................................................................................ 8,534,000 8,534,000

Korea: Osan AFB (113 units) .................................................................................................. 35,705,000 35,705,000
30

Location/project Requested Recommended

Korea: Osan AFB Housing Warehouse .................................................................................... 834,000 834,000

United Kingdom: Lakenheath AFB Housing Office Maintenance ........................................... 2,203,000 2,203,000

Total ........................................................................................................................... 416,438,000 416,438,000

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS

The following projects are to be accomplished within the amounts

provided for construction improvements:

Location/project Requested Recommended

Alabama:

Maxwell AFB (614 units) Privatization .......................................................................... ( 1 ) ( 1 )

Maxwell AFB Infrastructure ............................................................................................ $225,000 $225,000

Alaska:

Eielson AFB—Improve Utility System ............................................................................ 2,352,000 2,352,000

Eielson AFB—Improve Utility System ............................................................................ 1,675,000 1,675,000

Elmendorf AFB (192 units) ............................................................................................ 26,927,000 26,927,000

Davis-Monthan AFB—Improve Utility System ............................................................... 81,000 81,000

Davis-Monthan AFB—Improve Common Neighborhood Areas ...................................... 482,000 482,000

Davis-Monthan AFB—Improve Common Neighborhood Areas ...................................... 398,000 398,000

California:

Beale AFB—Improve Playground ................................................................................... 127,000 127,000

Los Angeles AFB—Improve Infrastructure .................................................................... 491,000 491,000

Colorado:

USAF Academy (66 units) .............................................................................................. 6,466,000 6,466,000

USAF Academy—Improve Infrastructure ....................................................................... 134,000 134,000

Peterson AFB (87 units) ................................................................................................ 7,531,000 7,531,000

Peterson AFB—Improve Parking ................................................................................... 795,000 795,000

Washington, DC: Bolling AFB—Improve Electrical System ................................................... 562,000 562,000

Florida:

Eglin AFB (Hurlburt) (213 units) ................................................................................... 12,422,000 12,422,000

Eglin AFB (Hurlburt) Construct Parking Cover .............................................................. 103,000 103,000

Patrick AFB—Improve Common Neighborhood Areas ................................................... 452,000 452,000

Tyndall AFB Housing Supply .......................................................................................... 101,000 101,000

Georgia: Robins AFB—Improve Infrastructure ....................................................................... 256,000 256,000

Massachusetts: Hanscom AFB (687 units) Privatization ....................................................... ( 1 ) ( 1 )

Missouri: Whiteman AFB—Improve Utility System ................................................................ 474,000 474,000

Mississippi: Keesler AFB—Improve Street ............................................................................. 175,000 175,000

New Mexico: Cannon AFB (1,294 units) Privatization ............................................................ 7,754,000 7,754,000

Ohio: Wright-Patterson AFB (222 units) ................................................................................. 13,436,000 13,436,000

South Carolina:

Charleston AFB—Improve Housing Office .................................................................... 258,000 258,000

Shaw AFB (1,704 units) Privatization ........................................................................... ( 1 ) ( 1 )

Texas: Laughlin AFB—Improve Housing Office ..................................................................... 255,000 255,000

Virginia:

Langley AFB (46 units) .................................................................................................. 15,643,000 15,643,000

Langley AFB—Improve Infrastructure ........................................................................... 362,000 362,000

Washington: McChord AFB—Improve Housing Office ............................................................ 376,000 376,000

Wyoming: F. E. Warren AFB (265 units) Privatization ........................................................... ( 1 ) ( 1 )

Germany:

Ramstein AFB (376 units) ............................................................................................. 51,526,000 51,526,000

Spangdahlem AFB (192 units) ...................................................................................... 21,229,000 21,229,000

Guam: Andersen AFB (112 units) ........................................................................................... 16,479,000 16,479,000

Japan: Kadena AFB (124 units) .............................................................................................. 15,989,000 15,989,000

United Kingdom: Lakenheath AFB (96 units) ......................................................................... 20,532,000 20,532,000

Total ........................................................................................................................... 226,068,000 226,068,000

1 No cost to the government privatization.

Family Housing, Dyess AFB, TX.—The Committee urges the Air

Force to evaluate family housing privatization as an option to improve the overall quality of family housing at Dyess AFB. In accordance with the Air Force fiscal year 2003 budget request, the
31

Committee recommends $14,824,000 of traditional military construction funding to replace 85 units of base housing. Privatization

could potentially leverage this initial investment to not only replace

these units but could also modernize additional family housing

units on the base.

FAMILY HOUSING, DEFENSE-WIDE

Appropriations, 2002 ............................................................................. $44,012,000

Budget estimate, 2003 ........................................................................... 47,875,000

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 47,875,000

The Committee recommends $47,875,000 for family housing, Defense-wide, in fiscal year 2003. This amount is equal to the budget

request. Specific details are included in the tables at the end of the

report.

FAMILY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND

Appropriations, 2002 ............................................................................. $2,000,000

Budget estimate, 2003 ........................................................................... 2,000,000

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 2,000,000

The Committee recommends $2,000,000 for the Family Housing

Improvement Fund. This amount is equal to the budget request.

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE

OVERVIEW

The Congress has appropriated, to date, a net total of

$22,026,046,000 for the Base Realignment and Closure program for

fiscal years 1990 through 2002. In the bill for fiscal year 2003, the

Committee is recommending total funding of $645,138,000 under

one account.

The Committee, in appropriating such funds, has provided the

Department with the flexibility to allocate funds by Service, by

function and by base. The Committee, in recognizing the complexities of realigning and closing bases and providing for environmental restoration, has provided such flexibility to allow the Office

of the Secretary of Defense to monitor the program execution of the

Services and to redistribute unobligated balances as appropriate to

avoid delays and to effect timely execution of realignment and closures along with environmental restoration.

The following table displays the total amount appropriated for

each round of base closure including amounts recommended for fiscal year 2003:

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE

[Total funding, fiscal year 1990 through fiscal year 2003]

Fiscal year 1990

through fiscal year

2001

Fiscal year 2002

enacted

Fiscal year 2003

Committee recommendedTotal

Part I ..................................................... $2,684,577,000 ( 1 ) ( 1 ) $2,684,577,000

Part II .................................................... 4,915,636,000 ( 1 ) ( 1 ) 4,915,636,000

Part III ................................................... 7,269,267,000 ( 1 ) ( 1 ) 7,269,267,000

Part IV ................................................... 6,523,853,000 $632,713,000 $645,138,000 7,801,704,000
32

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE—Continued

[Total funding, fiscal year 1990 through fiscal year 2003]

Fiscal year 1990

through fiscal year

2001

Fiscal year 2002

enacted

Fiscal year 2003

Committee recommendedTotal

Total ........................................ 21,393,333,000 632,713,000 645,138,000 22,671,184,000

1 Not Applicable

Since the start of the current process for Base Realignment and

Closure, Military Construction Appropriations Acts have appropriated a net total of $22,026,046,000 for the entire program for fiscal years 1990 through 2002. The total amount appropriated combined with the Committee recommendation for fiscal year 2003

Base Realignment and Closure is $22,671,184,000.

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT, PART IV

Appropriations, 2002 ............................................................................. $632,713,000

Budget estimate, 2003 ........................................................................... 545,138,000

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 645,138,000

The Committee recommends $645,138,000 for the base realignment and closure account, part IV. This is an increase of

$100,000,000 over the amount requested for fiscal year 2003, and

$12,425,000 over the amount appropriated in fiscal year 2002.

ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP ACCELERATION INITIATIVE

The Committee recommendation includes $100,000,000 for a

BRAC Environmental Cleanup Acceleration Initiative. This initiative is intended to address the backlog of critical environmental

cleanup requirements at military installations throughout the Nation that have been closed or realigned over the past 12 years.

Until environmental cleanup at these installations is completed,

the properties cannot be returned to productive use in the communities. To date, the Department of Defense (DOD) has transferred

less than half of the property at closed or realigned bases, primarily as a result of delays due to environmental cleanup-related

issues.

According to an April 2002 General Accounting Office report,

‘‘Environmental cleanup has been a long-standing concern in the

BRAC program—one that has been not only costly and challenging

for DOD but also frustrating for intended users of the property.

While DOD has already spent an estimated $7,000,000,000 through

fiscal year 2001 on BRAC environmental-related actions, DOD expects to spend an additional $3,500,000,000 beyond 2001 to complete its cleanup work.’’

The Committee remains extremely concerned about the pace of

environmental cleanup at closed or realigned bases, and urges the

Department of Defense to provide additional resources in future

budget requests to address this urgent requirement. The Army,

Navy and Air Force have identified a total of $237,168,000 in unfunded BRAC environmental cleanup requirements that could be

executed in fiscal year 2003 if additional funding were made available. The total includes $44,868,000 for the Army, $133,100,000 for

the Navy and $59,200,000 for the Air Force.
33

Under the BRAC Environmental Cleanup Acceleration Initiative, the Committee directs that an additional $20,000,000 be made

available for the Army, $55,000,000 for the Navy, and $25,000,000

for the Air Force for environmental cleanup. These funds are to be

allocated at the discretion of the Services to meet the most pressing

unfunded environmental cleanup requirements at closed or realigned bases.
(34)

GENERAL PROVISIONS

The following lists general provisions proposed by the Committee. The Committee recommends inclusion of several proposals

which have been incorporated in previous appropriations acts, provisions requested by the Defense Department, and new provisions.

The Committee recommendations are as follows:

SEC. 101. Restricts payments under a cost-plus-a-fixed-fee contract for work, except in cases of contracts for environmental restoration at base closure sites.

SEC. 102. Permits use of funds for hire of passenger motor vehicles.

SEC. 103. Permits use of funds for defense access roads.

SEC. 104. Prohibits construction of new bases inside the continental United States for which specific appropriations have not

been made.

SEC. 105. Limits the use of funds for purchase of land or land

easements.

SEC. 106. Prohibits the use of funds to acquire land, prepare a

site, or install utilities for any family housing except housing for

which funds have been made available.

SEC. 107. Limits the use of minor construction funds to transfer

or relocate activities among installations.

SEC. 108. Prohibits the procurement of steel unless American

producers, fabricators, and manufacturers have been allowed to

compete.

SEC. 109. Prohibits payments of real property taxes in foreign

nations.

SEC. 110. Prohibits construction of new bases overseas without

prior notification.

SEC. 111. Establishes a threshold for American preference of

$500,000 relating to architect and engineering services.

SEC. 112. Establishes preference for American contractors for

military construction in the United States territories and possessions in the Pacific, and on Kwajalein Atoll, or in the Arabian Sea.

SEC. 113. Requires notification of military exercises involving

construction in excess of $100,000.

SEC. 114. Limits obligations during the last 2 months of the year.

SEC. 115. Permits funds appropriated in prior years to be available for construction authorized during the current session of Congress.

SEC. 116. Permits the use of expired or lapsed funds to pay the

cost of supervision for any project being completed with lapsed

funds.

SEC. 117. Permits obligation of funds from more than 1 fiscal

year to execute a construction project, provided that the total obligation for such project is consistent with the total amount appropriated for the project.
35

SEC. 118. Allows expired funds to be transferred to the ‘‘Foreign

currency fluctuations, construction, defense’’ account.

SEC. 119. Directs the Department to report annually on actions

taken to encourage other nations to assume a greater share of the

common defense budget.

SEC. 120. Allows transfer of proceeds from earlier base realignment and closure accounts to the continuing base realignment and

closure accounts.

SEC. 121. Permits the transfer of funds from Family Housing

Construction accounts to the DOD Family Housing Improvement

Fund.

SEC. 122. Restricts the use of funds for the Partnership for Peace

Program.

SEC. 123. Requires the Secretary of Defense to notify the congressional defense committees of all family housing privatization solicitations and agreements which contain any clause providing consideration for base realignment and closure, force reductions and extended deployments.

SEC. 124. Provides transfer authority to the Homeowners Assistance Program.

SEC. 125. Requires that all Military Construction Appropriations

Acts be the sole funding source of all operation and maintenance

for family housing, including flag and general officer quarters, and

limits the repair on flag and general officer quarters to $35,000 per

year without prior notification to the defense committees.

SEC. 126. Directs the Department of Defense to accurately reflect

the costs of environmental remediation activities in its budget submissions for the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) account.

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7, RULE XVI, OF THE

STANDING RULES OF THE SENATE

Paragraph 7 of rule XVI requires that Committee reports on general appropriations bills identify each Committee amendment to

the House bill ‘‘which proposes an item of appropriation which is

not made to carry out the provisions of an existing law, a treaty

stipulation, or an act or resolution previously passed by the Senate

during that session.’’

The Committee bill as recommended contains no such provisions.

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7(C), RULE XXVI OF THE

STANDING RULES OF THE SENATE

Pursuant to paragraph 7(c) of rule XXVI, on June 27, 2002, the

Committee ordered reported S. 2708, an original Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations bill, 2003, and S. 2709, an original

Military Construction Appropriations bill, 2003, both subject to

amendment and both subject to their budget allocations, by a recorded vote of 29–0, a quorum being present. The vote was as follows:

Yeas Nays

Chairman Byrd

Mr. Inouye

Mr. Hollings

Mr. Leahy
36

Mr. Harkin

Ms. Mikulski

Mr. Reid

Mr. Kohl

Mrs. Murray

Mr. Dorgan

Mrs. Feinstein

Mr. Durbin

Mr. Johnson

Mrs. Landrieu

Mr. Reed

Mr. Stevens

Mr. Cochran

Mr. Specter

Mr. Domenici

Mr. Bond

Mr. McConnell

Mr. Burns

Mr. Shelby

Mr. Gregg

Mr. Bennett

Mr. Campbell

Mr. Craig

Mrs. Hutchison

Mr. DeWine

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 12, RULE XXVI OF THE

STANDING RULES OF THE SENATE

Paragraph 12 of rule XXVI requires that Committee reports on

a bill or joint resolution repealing or amending any statute or part

of any statute include ‘‘(a) the text of the statute or part thereof

which is proposed to be repealed; and (b) a comparative print of

that part of the bill or joint resolution making the amendment and

of the statute or part thereof proposed to be amended, showing by

stricken-through type and italics, parallel columns, or other appropriate typographical devices the omissions and insertions which

would be made by the bill or joint resolution if enacted in the form

recommended by the committee.’’

The Committee bill as recommended contains no such provisions.

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

ALABAMA

ARMY:

ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT: AMMUNITION CONTAINERIZATION DOORS ....... 1,900 1,900 ......................

FORT RUCKER:

CANTONMENT FENCING (DERF) ...................................................... 9,258 9,258 ......................

PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTER ........................................................... ...................... 3,500 ∂3,500

UH–60 PARKING APRON ................................................................. ...................... 3,050 ∂3,050

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: GADSEN: ADD/ALTER READINESS CENTER .............. 1,781 1,781 ......................

TOTAL, ALABAMA ................................................................................. 12,939 19,489 ∂6,550
37

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

ALASKA

ARMY:

FORT GREELY: FENCING (DERF) .............................................................. 2,700 2,700 ......................

FORT RICHARDSON:

BARRACKS COMPLEX—D STREET (PHASE II) ................................ 21,000 21,000 ......................

COMMUNITY CENTER ...................................................................... ...................... 15,000 ∂15,000

PERIMETER FENCING (DERF) ......................................................... 5,011 5,011 ......................

FORT WAINWRIGHT:

ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE PROTECTION WINDOWS (DERF) .............. 910 910 ......................

AUTOMATED SNIPER FIELD FIRE RANGE ........................................ 1,600 1,600 ......................

BATTALION HEADQUARTERS ........................................................... 18,000 18,000 ......................

FENCING INSTALLATION BOUNDARY (DERF) ................................... 6,896 6,896 ......................

INFANTRY PLATOON BATTLE COURSE ............................................ 24,000 24,000 ......................

MISSION SUPPORT TRAINING FACILITY .......................................... 50,000 50,000 ......................

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ................................................... 16,500 16,500 ......................

AIR FORCE:

CLEAR AIR STATION: UPGRADE POWER PLANT ....................................... 14,400 14,400 ......................

EIELSON AFB:

BLAIR LAKES RANGE MAINTENANCE COMPLEX .............................. ...................... 19,500 ∂19,500

CENTRAL HEAT PLANT BAG HOUSES .............................................. 21,600 21,600 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE:

ELMENDORF AFB: HOSPITAL CONSTRUCTION CLAIM PAYMENT .............. 10,400 10,400 ......................

FORT WAINWRIGHT: HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT (PHASE IV) ..................... 53,000 53,000 ......................

TOTAL, ALASKA .................................................................................... 246,017 280,517 ∂34,500

ARIZONA

NAVY: YUMA MARINE CORPS AIR STATION: COMBAT AIRCRAFT LOADING

APRON (PHASE II) ........................................................................................ 3,000 3,000 ......................

AIR FORCE:

DAVIS-MONTHAN AFB:

DORMITORY .................................................................................... 9,110 9,110 ......................

HH–60 APRON/TAXIWAY AND SHOULDERS ..................................... 3,720 3,720 ......................

HH–60 MAINTENANCE HANGAR ...................................................... 6,440 6,440 ......................

TOTAL, ARIZONA ......................................................................... 22,270 22,270 ......................

ARKANSAS

ARMY: PINE BLUFF ARSENAL: NON-STOCKPILE AMMUNITION DEMOLITION

SHOP ............................................................................................................ 18,937 ...................... ¥18,937

AIR FORCE:

LITTLE ROCK AFB:

ADD/ALTER FUSELAGE TRAINER FACILITY ...................................... 2,500 2,500 ......................

ENGINE/PROPELLER STORAGE FACILITY ......................................... 2,100 2,100 ......................

MAINTENANCE TRAINING FACILITY ................................................. 8,100 8,100 ......................

MAINTENANCE HANGAR .................................................................. 12,900 12,900 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: PINE BLUFF ARSENAL: NON-STOCKPILE AMMUNITION DEMOLITION SHOP ................................................................................................ ...................... 17,990 ∂17,990

AIR NATIONAL GUARD:

LITTLE ROCK AFB: OPERATIONS AND TRAINING FACILITY ....................... ...................... 5,100 ∂5,100

FORT SMITH MAP: OPERATIONS AND TRAINING FACILITY ....................... ...................... 6,000 ∂6,000

TOTAL, ARKANSAS ............................................................................... 44,537 54,690 ∂10,153

CALIFORNIA

ARMY: FORT IRWIN: FENCING (DERF) .............................................................. 2,522 2,522 ......................

NAVY:

CAMP PENDLETON MARINE CORPS BASE:

ADVANCED AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT VEHICLE TRAINING CMPLX ...... 28,810 28,810 ......................

AVIATION ARMAMENT SHOP ........................................................... 6,610 6,610 ......................

BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS ................................................... 23,230 23,230 ......................
38

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ....................................................... ...................... 8,230 ∂8,230

FIRE PROTECTION PIPELINE ........................................................... 5,320 5,320 ......................

FORCE INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS CENTER (DERF) ..................... 20,000 20,000 ......................

WATER TREATMENT, RESERVOIR AND DISTRIBUTION .................... 12,000 12,000 ......................

LEMOORE NAVAL AIR STATION:

AIR PASSENGER TERMINAL ............................................................ 8,070 8,070 ......................

AIRCRAFT PARKING APRON ............................................................ 8,450 8,450 ......................

SECURITY UPGRADES (DERF) ......................................................... 19,335 19,335 ......................

MIRAMAR MARINE CORPS AIR STATION:

CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SHOP ................................................. 5,540 5,540 ......................

HIGH EXPLOSIVE MAGAZINE ........................................................... 3,160 3,160 ......................

MONTEREY NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL: REPLACE PERIMETER SECURITY FENCE (DERF) ........................................................................ 2,020 2,020 ......................

POINT MUGU NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER: EXTEND AIRCRAFT PARKING APRON .......................................................................................... 6,760 6,760 ......................

PORT HUENEME: SEABEE TRAINING FACILITY ......................................... ...................... 10,170 ∂10,170

SAN DIEGO:

PERIMETER SECURITY LIGHTING (DERF) ........................................ 1,580 1,580 ......................

PIER 2 ELECTRICAL UPGRADE ....................................................... 3,530 3,530 ......................

REPLACE PIER (SAN CLEMENTE ISLAND) ....................................... 6,150 6,150 ......................

SECURITY LIGHTS, PIERS AND QUAYWALLS (DERF) ....................... 7,100 7,100 ......................

TWENTYNINE PALMS: BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS .......................... 25,770 25,770 ......................

AIR FORCE:

BEALE AFB:

GLOBAL HAWK DINING FACILITY ..................................................... 3,470 3,470 ......................

GLOBAL HAWK SQUADRON OPS/MAINTENANCE FACILITY ............... 3,670 3,670 ......................

GLOBAL HAWK UPGRADE MAINTENANCE DOCK ............................. 4,600 4,600 ......................

TRAVIS AFB:

C–17 FLIGHT SIMULATOR ............................................................... ...................... 4,596 ∂4,596

C–17 PARTS STORE ....................................................................... ...................... 7,998 ∂7,998

ELECTRICAL/UTILITIES AND SUPPORTING INFRASTRUCTURE ......... ...................... 11,297 ∂11,297

VANDENBERG AFB:

INSTALL STORMWATER DRAINAGE .................................................. 3,100 3,100 ......................

UPGRADE WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (PHASE II) .................... 7,400 7,400 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: TRAVIS AFB: REPLACE BULK FUEL STORAGE TANKS ............. 16,000 16,000 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:

MORENA VALLEY: READINESS CENTER ................................................... 12,044 12,044 ......................

SAN DIEGO: ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP ............................... 6,774 6,774 ......................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: SEPULVEDA: COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS

TRAINING FACILITY ....................................................................................... ...................... 7,000 ∂7,000

ARMY RESERVE: VALLEJO: ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP/MARINE

AMSA ............................................................................................................ 6,501 6,501 ......................

AIR FORCE RESERVE:

MARCH ARB:

C–17 ALTER SQUADRON OPERATIONS FACILITY ............................ ...................... 1,696 ∂1,696

C–17 ALTER CO-LOCATED LIFE SUPPORT BUILDING ..................... ...................... 3,026 ∂3,026

C–17 ALTER GENERAL MAINTENANCE SHOPS ............................... ...................... 2,004 ∂2,004

TOTAL, CALIFORNIA .................................................................... 259,516 315,533 ∂56,017

COLORADO

ARMY:

FORT CARSON:

BARRACKS COMPLEX—NELSON BLVD (PHASE II) ......................... 42,000 42,000 ......................

FENCING (DERF) ............................................................................. 4,348 4,348 ......................

TRUCK LOADING/UNLOADING DOCKS ............................................. 1,100 1,100 ......................

PUEBLO DEPOT: AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY (PHASE

IV) ....................................................................................................... 38,000 ...................... ¥38,000

AIR FORCE:

BUCKLEY AIR FORCE BASE:

ADD/ALTER SBIRS MISSION CONTROL STATION ............................. 6,900 6,900 ......................
39

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

WING HEADQUARTERS/ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITY .......................... 10,800 10,800 ......................

PETERSON AFB:

AT/FP SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR HQ COMPLEX (DERF) ................. 2,000 2,000 ......................

NORAD BATTLE MANAGEMENT CENTER (DERF) ............................. 3,500 3,500 ......................

SCHRIEVER AFB: VISITORS CENTER/ENTRY CONTROL GATES (DERF) .... 5,700 5,700 ......................

U.S. AIR FORCE ACADEMY: PERIMETER FENCE—CADET AREA (PHASE

I) (DERF) ............................................................................................. 4,200 4,200 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE:

PETERSON AFB: FAC REFURBISHMENT HOMELAND SECURITY CINC

(DERF) ................................................................................................. 25,000 23,000 ¥2,000

PUEBLO DEPOT: AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY (PHASE

IV) ....................................................................................................... ...................... 36,100 ∂36,100

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: BUCKLEY AFB: CONTROL TOWER ................................ ...................... 5,900 ∂5,900

TOTAL, COLORADO .............................................................................. 143,548 145,548 ∂2,000

CONNECTICUT

NAVY:

NEW LONDON NAVAL SUBMARINE BASE:

GATE 1 SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS (DERF) .................................... 4,080 4,080 ......................

GATE 7 TRUCK ACCESS SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS (DERF) .......... 3,800 3,800 ......................

TOTAL, CONNECTICUT ................................................................ 7,880 7,880 ......................

DELAWARE

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: NEW CASTLE COUNTY AIRPORT: PARKING APRON ...... ...................... 10,800 ∂10,800

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ARMY:

WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER:

ELECTRICAL SWITCH STATION (DERF) ............................................ 7,400 7,400 ......................

PHYSICAL SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS/FOREST GLEN (DERF) ......... 2,550 2,550 ......................

PHYSICAL SECURITY, MAIN SECTION (DERF) ................................. 3,844 3,844 ......................

NAVY:

8TH AND I MARINE BARRACKS: SITE IMPROVEMENTS ........................... 3,700 3,700 ......................

WASHINGTON NAVAL YARD: O STREET VISITOR PROCESS CENTER

(DERF) ................................................................................................. 2,690 2,690 ......................

AIR FORCE:

BOLLING AFB:

PERIMETER WALL, NORTH GATE TO NAVY LINE (DERF) ................ 1,500 1,500 ......................

SECURITY FORCES OPERATIONS FACILITY (DERF) ......................... 3,500 3,500 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE:

BOLLING AFB: DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS CENTER .................... 121,958 121,958 ......................

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: PARKING GARAGE ............................................ 2,500 ...................... ¥2,500

TOTAL, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA .......................................................... 149,642 147,142 ¥2,500

FLORIDA

NAVY:

EGLIN AFB: ADVANCED EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL TRAINING

FAC ..................................................................................................... 6,350 6,350 ......................

JACKSONVILLE NAVAL AIR STATION:

BIRMINGHAM GATE SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS (DERF) ................. 1,890 1,890 ......................

COMMERCIAL GATE SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS (DERF) ................ 2,680 2,680 ......................

YORKTOWN GATE SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS (DERF) .................... 2,200 2,200 ......................

MAYPORT NAVAL STATION: PERIMETER SECURITY UPGRADES (DERF) ... 1,900 1,900 ......................

PANAMA CITY NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER: SPECIAL OPERATIONS FACILITY ................................................................................. ...................... 10,700 ∂10,700

PENSACOLA NAVAL AIR STATION: RUNWAY APPROACH LIGHTS .............. 990 990 ......................

AIR FORCE:

EGLIN AFB:

BARRIERS AND INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM (DERF) ............... 1,050 1,050 ......................
40

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

SECURITY FENCING (DERF) ............................................................ 3,200 3,200 ......................

HURLBURT FIELD:

DORMITORY .................................................................................... 9,000 9,000 ......................

FORCE PROTECTION IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE I) (DERF) ................ 3,500 3,500 ......................

FORCE PROTECTION IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE II) (DERF) ............... 2,500 2,500 ......................

MACDILL AFB: ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE PROTECTION GATES (DERF) .... 7,000 7,000 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE:

EGLIN AFB:

ADD/ALTER COMMAND AND OPERATIONS FACILITY ....................... 9,000 9,000 ......................

ALTER FACILITIES FOR CV–22 ....................................................... 2,100 2,100 ......................

AIR FORCE RESERVE:

HOMESTEAD ARB: INSTALLATION PERIMETER FENCE (DERF) ................. 1,100 1,100 ......................

TOTAL, FLORIDA .................................................................................. 54,460 65,160 ∂10,700

GEORGIA

ARMY:

FORT BENNING:

AT/FP ACCESS CONTROL POINTS (DERF) ....................................... 8,000 8,000 ......................

BARRACKS COMPLEX—MAIN POST (PHASE I) ............................... 45,000 45,000 ......................

CANTONMENT FENCING (DERF) ...................................................... 11,986 11,986 ......................

URBAN ASSAULT COURSE .............................................................. 3,250 3,250 ......................

FORT STEWART: SABER HALL COMPLEX ................................................. 26,000 26,000 ......................

NAVY: KINGS BAY NAVAL SUBMARINE BASE: STIMSON GATE SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS (DERF) ................................................................................... 1,580 1,580 ......................

AIR FORCE:

ROBINS AFB:

BASE ENTRANCE/VISITORS FACILITY (DERF) .................................. 5,400 5,400 ......................

CORROSION PAINT/DE-PAINT FACILITY ........................................... ...................... 24,000 ∂24,000

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: SAVANNAH IAP: BASE ENTRANCE ROAD (DERF) ......... 1,450 1,450 ......................

NAVY RESERVE:

ATLANTA NAVAL AIR STATION: BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS ........... 6,730 6,730 ......................

SAVANNAH MARINE CORPS RESERVE CENTER: RESERVE TRAINING

BUILDING ............................................................................................ 5,900 5,900 ......................

AIR FORCE RESERVE: DOBBINS ARB: VISITORS CENTER (DERF) .................... 2,000 2,000 ......................

TOTAL, GEORGIA ................................................................................. 117,296 141,296 ∂24,000

HAWAII

ARMY:

POHAKULOA TRAINING AREA: ACCESS ROAD (SADDLE ROAD) PHASE

I .......................................................................................................... ...................... 13,000 ∂13,000

SCHOFIELD BARRACKS:

BARRACKS COMPLEX—CAPRON AVENUE (PHASE I) ..................... 49,000 49,000 ......................

BARRACKS COMPLEX—QUAD C .................................................... 42,000 42,000 ......................

NAVY:

FORD ISLAND: SITE IMPROVEMENTS (UTILITY SYSTEMS) ....................... ...................... 19,400 ∂19,400

MARINE CORPS BASE/OAHU: RELIGIOUS MINISTRY FACILITY

(CHAPEL) ............................................................................................. ...................... 9,500 ∂9,500

PEARL HARBOR NAVAL STATION:

RECAPITALIZE BRAVO WHARFS ...................................................... 10,490 10,490 ......................

SECURITY LIGHTING (DERF) ........................................................... 4,200 4,200 ......................

AIR FORCE: HICKAM AFB: FLIGHTLINE SECURITY FENCING/GATES (PHASE I)

(DERF) .......................................................................................................... 1,350 1,350 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE:

HICKAM AFB: LIFE SKILLS CLINIC REPLACEMENT ................................... 2,700 2,700 ......................

KAUAI PACIFIC MISSILE RANGE FACILITY: THAAD TEST FACILITY ........... 23,400 23,400 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: BARBERS POINT: ADD/ALTER ADMINISTRATIVE

BUILDING (PHASE I) ..................................................................................... 22,473 22,473 ......................

TOTAL, HAWAII .................................................................................... 155,613 197,513 ∂41,900
41

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

IDAHO

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: GOWEN FIELD/BOISE: READINESS CENTER ............. ...................... 1,500 ∂1,500

AIR NATIONAL GUARD:

GOWEN FIELD/BOISE: AIR SUPPORT SQUADRON (BEDDOWN) ................. ...................... 6,700 ∂6,700

TOTAL, IDAHO ...................................................................................... ...................... 8,200 ∂8,200

ILLINOIS

NAVY:

GREAT LAKES NAVAL TRAINING CENTER:

COMMERCIAL TRUCK INSPECTION FACILITY (DERF) ...................... 1,620 1,620 ......................

INTRUSION RESISTANT GATES (DERF) ............................................ 6,470 6,470 ......................

RECRUIT BARRACKS ....................................................................... 43,360 38,360 ¥5,000

RECRUIT BARRACKS ....................................................................... 41,740 36,740 ¥5,000

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: SPRINGFIELD (CAPITOL AIRPORT): COMPOSITE SUPPORT FACILITY ............................................................................................. ...................... 10,000 ∂10,000

TOTAL, ILLINOIS .................................................................................. 93,190 93,190 ......................

INDIANA

ARMY: NEWPORT ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT: AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY (PHASE V) ............................................................................ 61,494 ...................... ¥61,494

DEFENSE-WIDE: NEWPORT ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT: AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY (PHASE V) ................................................................. ...................... 58,420 ∂58,420

AIR FORCE RESERVE: GRISSOM AIR RESERVE BASE: ADDITION/ALTERATION

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR ............................................................... ...................... 6,000 ∂6,000

TOTAL, INDIANA ................................................................................... 61,494 64,420 ∂2,926

IOWA

AIR NATIONAL GUARD:

DES MOINES: AIRFIELD FACILITIES UPGRADE ......................................... ...................... 9,200 ∂9,200

SIOUX GATEWAY AIRPORT:

KC–135 UPGRADE AIRCRAFT MAINT. HANGAR AND SHOP ............ 6,900 6,900 ......................

KC–135 UPGRADE SHOPS AND OPERATIONS FACILITY .................. 4,800 4,800 ......................

TOTAL, IOWA .............................................................................. 11,700 20,900 ∂9,200

KANSAS

ARMY:

FORT LEAVENWORTH:

ACCESS CONTROL POINTS (DERF) ................................................. 3,150 3,150 ......................

CANTONMENT FENCING (DERF) ...................................................... 4,829 4,829 ......................

FORT RILEY:

ACCESS CONTROL GATES (DERF) .................................................. 6,000 6,000 ......................

BARRACKS COMPLEX—INFANTRY DRIVE EAST ............................. 41,000 41,000 ......................

CANTONMENT FENCING (DERF) ...................................................... 7,095 7,095 ......................

COMBINED ARMS COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY, PH I .............. ...................... 13,800 ∂13,800

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:

FORT RILEY: ADD/ALTER ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP ........... 770 770 ......................

KANSAS CITY: ADD/ALTER ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP ......... 771 771 ......................

TOPEKA: ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER .......................................... 14,607 14,607 ......................

TOTAL, KANSAS ................................................................................... 78,222 92,022 ∂13,800

KENTUCKY

ARMY:

BLUE GRASS ARMY DEPOT:

AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY (PHASE III) .................. 10,300 ...................... ¥10,300

AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION SUPPORT (PHASE III) ................. 8,300 ...................... ¥8,300

RAILYARD INFRASTRUCTURE .......................................................... 5,500 5,500 ......................
42

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

FORT CAMPBELL: BARRACKS COMPLEX—RANGE ROAD (PHASE I) ....... 49,000 49,000 ......................

FORT KNOX:

ACCESS CONTROL (DERF) .............................................................. 2,529 2,529 ......................

CANTONMENT FENCING (DERF) ...................................................... 3,344 3,344 ......................

CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ....................................................... ...................... 6,800 ∂6,800

DEFENSE-WIDE:

BLUE GRASS ARMY DEPOT:

AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY (PHASE II) ................... ...................... 9,785 ∂9,785

AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION SUPPORT (PHASE III) ................. ...................... 7,885 ∂7,885

TOTAL, KENTUCKY ...................................................................... 78,973 84,843 ∂5,870

LOUISIANA

ARMY:

FORT POLK:

DIGITAL MULTI-PURPOSE TRAINING RANGE ................................... 31,000 31,000 ......................

FENCING (DERF) ............................................................................. 6,620 6,620 ......................

AIR FORCE:

BARKSDALE AFB:

DORMITORY .................................................................................... 10,900 10,900 ......................

PARKING APRON ............................................................................. ...................... 12,000 ∂12,000

DEFENSE-WIDE: NEW ORLEANS NAVAL AIR STATION: REPLACE BULK FUEL

STORAGE TANKS .......................................................................................... 9,500 9,500 ......................

NAVY RESERVE:

NEW ORLEANS NAVAL AIR STATION:

ENGINE MAINTENANCE SHOP ADDITION ......................................... 1,500 1,500 ......................

HAZARDOUS MATERIAL STORAGE ................................................... 2,690 2,690 ......................

PERIMETER ROAD AND FENCING (DERF) ....................................... 1,510 1,510 ......................

RUNWAY AND TAXIWAY EXTENSION ............................................... 14,600 14,600 ......................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: NEW ORLEANS JOINT RESERVE BASE BELLE CHASSE:

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT SHOP ................................. ...................... 5,500 ∂5,500

TOTAL, LOUISIANA ............................................................................... 78,320 95,820 ∂17,500

MAINE

NAVY:

BRUNSWICK NAVAL AIR STATION: CONTROL TOWER UPGRADE .............. ...................... 9,830 ∂9,830

PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD:

ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE PROTECTION IMPROVEMENTS ................ 11,600 11,600 ......................

GATE 1 SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS (DERF) .................................... 3,600 3,600 ......................

TOTAL, MAINE ............................................................................ 15,200 25,030 ∂9,830

MARYLAND

ARMY:

ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND: AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY (PHASE V) ..................................................................................... 30,600 ...................... ¥30,600

FORT DETRICK:

BARRACKS COMPLEX—PORTER STREET SOUTH ........................... 16,000 16,000 ......................

COMMUNITY SUPPORT CENTER ...................................................... 3,700 3,700 ......................

NAVY:

ANDREWS AFB NAVAL AIR FACILITY: BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS

REPLACEMENT .................................................................................... 9,680 9,680 ......................

CARDEROCK (NSWC): NATIONAL MARITIME TECHNICAL INFORMATION

CENTER ............................................................................................... ...................... 12,900 ∂12,900

AIR FORCE:

ANDREWS AFB:

ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE PROTECTION POV GATES (DERF) ........... 4,100 4,100 ......................

ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE PROT REMAINING GATES (DERF) ........... 5,500 5,500 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE:

ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND: AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY (PHASE V) ..................................................................................... ...................... 29,070 ∂29,070
43

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

FORT MEADE:

PERIMETER SECURITY .................................................................... 1,896 1,896 ......................

OPERATIONS BUILDING 1 STAIR TOWERS ...................................... 2,588 2,588 ......................

TOTAL, MARYLAND ..................................................................... 74,064 85,434 ∂11,370

MASSACHUSETTS

AIR FORCE:

FOURTH CLIFF RECREATION AREA: EROSION CONTROL/RETAINING

WALL ................................................................................................... ...................... 9,476 ∂9,476

HANSCOM AFB: ADD/ALTER FITNESS CENTER ........................................ 7,700 7,700 ......................

TOTAL, MASSACHUSETTS .................................................................... 7,700 17,176 ∂9,476

MICHIGAN

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: LANSING: JOINT/MULTI-UNIT READINESS CENTER,

PHASE I ........................................................................................................ ...................... 16,928 ∂16,928

AIR NATIONAL GUARD:

SELFRIDGE ANGB:

ADD PERIMETER FENCING (DERF) ................................................. 1,000 1,000 ......................

JOINT DINING FACILITY ................................................................... ...................... 8,500 ∂8,500

TOTAL, MICHIGAN ....................................................................... 1,000 26,428 ∂25,428

MINNESOTA

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: DULUTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT: AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR & SHOP, PHASE II ......................................................... ...................... 15,000 ∂15,000

NAVY RESERVE: DULUTH NAVAL RESERVE CENTER: HARDEN RESERVE

BUILDING (DERF) ......................................................................................... 1,450 1,450 ......................

TOTAL, MINNESOTA ............................................................................. 1,450 16,450 ∂15,000

MISSISSIPPI

NAVY:

GULFPORT NAVAL CONSTRUCTION BATTALION CENTER: COMMUNICATIONS/INSTRUCTION FACILITY ............................................................. 5,460 5,460 ......................

MERIDIAN NAVAL AIR STATION: CONTROL TOWER AND BEACON

TOWER ................................................................................................ ...................... 2,850 ∂2,850

PASCAGOULA NAVAL STATION:

BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS (100 SPACES) ........................... ...................... 10,500 ∂10,500

CONSTRUCT NEW NAVY CHANNEL ................................................. 4,160 4,160 ......................

AIR FORCE: KEESLER AFB: STUDENT DORMITORY ........................................... 22,000 22,000 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND: STENNIS SPACE CENTER,

LAND/WATER RANGES .................................................................................. ...................... 5,000 ∂5,000

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: KOSCIUSKO: READINESS CENTER ............................ ...................... 2,300 ∂2,300

AIR NATIONAL GUARD:

JACKSON IAP:

C–17 CONSTRUCT MAINTENANCE TRAINING FACILITY ................... 4,100 4,100 ......................

C–17 REPLACE FUEL CELL HANGAR/SHOP .................................... 25,000 25,000 ......................

TOTAL, MISSISSIPPI .................................................................... 60,720 81,370 ∂20,650

MISSOURI

ARMY:

FORT LEONARD WOOD:

ACCESS CONTROL POINTS 4 LOCATIONS (DERF) ........................... 9,493 9,493 ......................

TACTICAL VEHICLE SIMULATOR BUILDING ..................................... 15,500 15,500 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: FORT LEONARD WOOD: AVIATION SUPPORT FACILITY ................................................................................................................ ...................... 14,767 ∂14,767

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: ST. LOUIS/LAMBERT FIELD: BASE RELOCATION/FACILITIES UPGRADE ....................................................................................... ...................... 4,000 ∂4,000
44

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

TOTAL, MISSOURI ................................................................................ 24,993 43,760 ∂18,767

MONTANA

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: GORE HILL/GREAT FALLS: LOAD CREW TRAINING FACILITY ........................................................................................................... ...................... 3,500 ∂3,500

NAVY RESERVE:

BILLINGS NAVAL RESERVE CENTER ........................................................ 16,293

RESERVE CENTER WITH LAND ....................................................... 5,905 5,905 ......................

TOTAL, MONTANA ....................................................................... 5,905 9,405 ∂3,500

NEBRASKA

AIR FORCE: OFFUTT AFB: FIRE/CRASH RESCUE STATION ................................ ...................... 11,000 ∂11,000

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:

LINCOLN: ADD/ALTER READINESS CENTER ............................................. 757 757 ......................

NORFOLK: ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP .................................. 3,666 3,666 ......................

ARMY RESERVE: LINCOLN: RESERVE CENTER/MAINT SHOP/UNHEATED STORAGE .............................................................................................................. 8,732 8,732 ......................

TOTAL, NEBRASKA ............................................................................... 13,155 24,155 ∂11,000

NEVADA

AIR FORCE:

NELLIS AFB:

DORMITORY .................................................................................... 12,280 12,280 ......................

EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL FACILITY (DERF) ....................... 6,900 6,900 ......................

F–22 MUNITIONS MAINTENANCE FACILITY ..................................... 3,170 3,170 ......................

LAND ACQUISITION ......................................................................... 15,000 15,000 ......................

LAND ACQUISITION ......................................................................... ...................... 19,500 ∂19,500

TOTAL, NEVADA .......................................................................... 37,350 56,850 ∂19,500

NEW HAMPSHIRE

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: PEASE AIR BASE: FIRE STATION ................................. ...................... 4,450 ∂4,450

NEW JERSEY

NAVY:

EARLE NAVAL WEAPONS STATION: WATERFRONT MAIN GATE SECURITY

IMPROVEMENTS (DERF) ...................................................................... 5,600 5,600 ......................

LAKEHURST NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER: STRUCTURAL & AIRCRAFT

FIRE RESCUE STATION ........................................................................ ...................... 5,200 ∂5,200

AIR FORCE: MCGUIRE AFB: C–17 FLIGHTLINE OPERATIONS FACILITIES ......... 24,631 24,631 ......................

TOTAL, NEW JERSEY ........................................................................... 30,231 35,431 ∂5,200

NEW MEXICO

AIR FORCE:

CANNON AFB: SECURITY FORCES OPERATIONS FACILITY (DERF) ........... 4,650 4,650 ......................

HOLLOMAN AFB: SURVIVAL EQUIPMENT SHOP ........................................ ...................... 4,650 ∂4,650

KIRTLAND AFB:

VISITING AIRMEN QUARTERS .......................................................... ...................... 8,400 ∂8,400

RELOCATE TRUMAN GATE (DERF) .................................................. 2,500 2,500 ......................

UPGRADE MUNITIONS MAINT STORAGE COMPLEX SEC (DERF) ..... 11,000 11,000 ......................

TOTAL, NEW MEXICO .................................................................. 18,150 31,200 ∂13,050

NEW YORK

ARMY:

FORT DRUM: SHOOT HOUSE .................................................................... 1,500 1,500 ......................

WEST POINT: FENCING WEST POINT PROPER (DERF) ............................. 4,991 4,991 ......................
45

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

DEFENSE-WIDE:

WEST POINT:

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION ............................... 3,898 3,898 ......................

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION (DERF) .................. 449 449 ......................

ARMY RESERVE: OSWEGO: RESERVE CENTER/MAINT SHOP/UNHEATED STORAGE .............................................................................................................. 5,492 5,492 ......................

NAVY RESERVE: SYRACUSE MARINE CORPS RESERVE CENTER: VEHICLE

MAINTENANCE FACILITY ............................................................................... 2,030 2,030 ......................

AIR FORCE RESERVE: NIAGARA FALLS AIR RESERVE STATION: VISITING AIRMEN QUARTERS, PHASE I ............................................................................ ...................... 9,000 ∂9,000

TOTAL, NEW YORK .............................................................................. 18,360 27,360 ∂9,000

NORTH CAROLINA

ARMY:

FORT BRAGG:

BARRACKS COMPLEX—ARMISTEAD STREET .................................. 50,000 50,000 ......................

BARRACKS COMPLEX—BUTNER ROAD (PHASE III) ....................... 50,000 50,000 ......................

CONSOLIDATED FUEL FACILITY ....................................................... 17,500 17,500 ......................

FENCING (DERF) ............................................................................. 4,732 4,732 ......................

FORCE PROTECTION PLAN (PHASE II) (DERF) ................................ 18,000 18,000 ......................

NAVY:

CAMP LEJEUNE MARINE CORPS BASE: FITNESS CENTER ADDITION ....... 5,370 5,370 ......................

CHERRY POINT MARINE CORPS AIR STATION: T–56 TEST CELL ............ 6,040 6,040 ......................

NEW RIVER MARINE CORPS AIR STATION: PROPERTY CONTROL FACILITY ....................................................................................................... 6,920 6,920 ......................

AIR FORCE:

POPE AFB: DORMITORY ........................................................................... 9,700 9,700 ......................

SEYMOUR JOHNSON: FIRE/CRASH RESCUE STATION .............................. ...................... 10,600 ∂10,600

DEFENSE-WIDE:

CAMP LEJEUNE MARINE CORPS BASE:

REPLACE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL .................................................... 10,884 10,884 ......................

REPLACE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (DERF) ........................................ 1,254 1,254 ......................

FORT BRAGG:

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION ............................... 900 900 ......................

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION (DERF) .................. 104 104 ......................

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION ............................... 925 925 ......................

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION (DERF) .................. 107 107 ......................

RENOVATE BRYANT HALL ............................................................... 11,600 11,600 ......................

WEAPONS TRAINING FACILITY ........................................................ 19,200 19,200 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: ELIZABETH CITY: MOTOR VEHICLE STORAGE COMPOUND ......................................................................................................... 208 208 ......................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: CHARLOTTE/DOUGLAS IAP: RELOCATE ROAD AND

GATE HOUSE (DERF) .................................................................................... 2,500 2,500 ......................

ARMY RESERVE: FORT BRAGG: ADD/ALTER ARMY RESERVE CENTER ............ 1,624 1,624 ......................

TOTAL, NORTH CAROLINA ................................................................... 217,568 228,168 ∂10,600

NORTH DAKOTA

AIR FORCE: MINOT AFB: CRUISE MISSILE STORAGE FACILITY ........................ ...................... 18,000 ∂18,000

OHIO

AIR FORCE:

WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB:

AFTER GRADUATE EDUCATION FACILITY ........................................ ...................... 13,000 ∂13,000

DORMITORY .................................................................................... 10,400 ...................... ¥10,400

FULLY CONTAINED SMALL ARMS RANGE COMPLEX (DERF) ........... 12,000 9,700 ¥2,300

CONSOLIDATE MATERIALS COMPUTATIONAL RESEARCH FAC ........ ...................... 15,200 ∂15,200

DEFENSE-WIDE: COLUMBUS DEFENSE SUPPLY CENTER: PHYSICAL FITNESS

FACILITY ....................................................................................................... 5,021 5,021 ......................

NAVY RESERVE: COLUMBUS NAVAL AND MARINE CORPS RESERVE CENTER:

HARDEN RESERVE BUILDING (DERF) ........................................................... 1,040 1,040 ......................
46

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

AIR FORCE RESERVE: YOUNGSTOWN ARS: VISITORS CENTER (DERF) ............ 2,500 ...................... ¥2,500

TOTAL, OHIO ........................................................................................ 30,961 43,961 ∂13,000

OKLAHOMA

ARMY:

FORT SILL:

CANTONMENT FENCING (DERF) ...................................................... 4,652 4,652 ......................

LOGISTICS MAINTENANCE FACILITY, PHASE I ................................ ...................... 10,000 ∂10,000

AIR FORCE:

ALTUS AFB: CONSOLIDATE BASE ENGINEER COMPLEX, PHASE I ........... ...................... 7,700 ∂7,700

VANCE AFB: ROAD REPAIR (ELAM ROAD) ............................................... ...................... 4,800 ∂4,800

TOTAL, OKLAHOMA .............................................................................. 4,652 27,152 ∂22,500

OREGON

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: KLAMATH FALLS AIRPORT-KINGSLEY FIELD: REPLACE

PERIMETER FENCING (DERF) ....................................................................... 1,000 1,000 ......................

AIR FORCE RESERVE:

PORTLAND IAP:

ALTER MAINTENANCE HANGAR ....................................................... 525 525 ......................

ALTER MAINTENANCE SHOPS ......................................................... 2,650 2,650 ......................

CONSOLIDATED TRAINING FACILITY (PHASE I) ............................... 1,609 1,609 ......................

HYDRANT REFUELING SYSTEM (PHASE I) ...................................... 6,400 6,400 ......................

TOTAL, OREGON ......................................................................... 12,184 12,184 ......................

PENNSYLVANIA

ARMY: LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT: AMMUNITION ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE ... 1,550 1,550 ......................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD:

FORT INDIANTOWN GAP: BASE ENTRY, RELOCATE ROAD AND FENCING

(DERF) ................................................................................................. 2,300 2,300 ......................

PITTSBURGH: SQUADRON OPERATIONS & SUPPORT FACILITY ................ ...................... 7,700 ∂7,700

TOTAL, PENNSYLVANIA ........................................................................ 3,850 11,550 ∂7,700

RHODE ISLAND

NAVY: NEWPORT NAVAL STATION: CONSOLIDATED POLICE/FIRE/SECURITY

FACILITY ....................................................................................................... ...................... 9,030 ∂9,030

SOUTH CAROLINA

ARMY:

FORT JACKSON:

BASIC COMBAT TRAINING COMPLEX (PHASE II) ............................ 39,000 39,000 ......................

CANTONMENT FENCING (DERF) ...................................................... 3,051 3,051 ......................

NAVY:

BEAUFORT MARINE CORPS AIR STATION: AIRCRAFT ACOUSTICAL ENCLOSURE ............................................................................................. 13,700 13,700 ......................

CHARLESTON NAVAL WEAPONS STATION: SECURITY CONSOLIDATION

(DERF) ................................................................................................. 5,740 5,740 ......................

PARRIS ISLAND MARINE CORPS RECRUIT DEPOT:

ALL WEATHER TRAINING FACILITY .................................................. 7,410 7,410 ......................

RECRUIT TRAINING FACILITY ADDITION .......................................... 3,080 3,080 ......................

AIR FORCE: SHAW AFB: FIGHTER SQUADRON MAINTENANCE FACILITIES ........ ...................... 6,800 ∂6,800

DEFENSE-WIDE:

FORT JACKSON:

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION ............................... 865 865 ......................

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION (DERF) .................. 100 100 ......................

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION ............................... 1,382 1,382 ......................

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION (DERF) .................. 159 159 ......................
47

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: MCENTIRE AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE: REPLACE

OPERATIONS & TRAINING FACILITY ............................................................. ...................... 10,200 ∂10,200

TOTAL, SOUTH CAROLINA .................................................................... 74,487 91,487 ∂17,000

SOUTH DAKOTA

AIR FORCE: ELLSWORTH AFB: OPERATIONS FACILITY ...................................... ...................... 13,200 ∂13,200

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: CAMP RAPID: BARRACKS/DINING/ADMINISTRATION

& PARKING, PHASE I ................................................................................... ...................... 10,593 ∂10,593

TOTAL, SOUTH DAKOTA ....................................................................... ...................... 23,793 ∂23,793

TEXAS

ARMY:

FORT BLISS: CANTONMENT FENCING (DERF) .......................................... 4,291 4,291 ......................

FORT HOOD:

ACCESS CONTROL BUILDING (DERF) ............................................. 24,000 24,000 ......................

BARRACKS COMPLEX—CLEAR CREEK ROAD ................................ 45,000 45,000 ......................

FENCING (DERF) ............................................................................. 2,461 2,461 ......................

NAVY:

INGLESIDE: MINE WARFARE TRAINING CENTER ...................................... ...................... 5,480 ∂5,480

KINGSVILLE NAVAL AIR STATION: UPGRADE AIRFIELD LIGHTING AND

CONTROLS ........................................................................................... 6,210 6,210 ......................

AIR FORCE:

CAMP BULLIS:

MOUT TRAINING FACILITY (DERF) .................................................. 6,000 6,000 ......................

VISITING QUARTERS (DERF) ........................................................... 4,000 4,000 ......................

GOODFELLOW AFB: WING SUPPORT COMPLEX ........................................ ...................... 10,600 ∂10,600

LACKLAND AFB:

STUDENT DORMITORY .................................................................... 18,500 18,500 ......................

MILITARY OPERATIONS IN URBAN TERRAIN (MOUT) (DERF) .......... 13,000 13,000 ......................

SHEPPARD AFB:

DORMITORY .................................................................................... 10,000 10,000 ......................

EURO-NATO JOINT PILOT TRAINING, FLIGHT SIMULATOR ............... 6,000 6,000 ......................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: FORT BLISS: BASE DEFENSE TRAINING CENTER ......... ...................... 8,700 ∂8,700

ARMY RESERVE: GRAND PRAIRIE: RESERVE CENTER/MAINTENANCE SHOP .... 9,113 9,113 ......................

NAVY RESERVE:

FORT WORTH NAVAL AIR STATION/JOINT RESERVE BASE: BASE PASS,

ID AND VISITORS CENTER (DERF) ...................................................... 1,500 1,500 ......................

WACO MARINE CORPS RESERVE CENTER: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY .................................................................................................. 4,140 4,140 ......................

TOTAL, TEXAS ...................................................................................... 154,215 178,995 ∂24,780

UTAH

AIR FORCE: HILL AFB: CONSOLIDATED SOFTWARE SUPPORT FACILITY ........... ...................... 16,500 ∂16,500

VERMONT

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: SOUTH BURLINGTON: READINESS CENTER, PHASE

I ................................................................................................................... ...................... 11,241 ∂11,241

VIRGINIA

ARMY:

FORT EUSTIS: FENCING AND ACCESS ROADS (DERF) ............................. 4,133 4,133 ......................

FORT LEE: CANTONMENT FENCING (DERF) ............................................. 1,903 1,903 ......................

NAVY:

DAHLGREN NAVAL SURFACE WEAPONS CENTER:

CHEMICAL/BIOLOGICAL WARFARE DETACHMENT FAC (DERF) ........ 6,600 6,600 ......................

THEATER WARFARE INTEGRATION CENTER .................................... 9,230 9,230 ......................

LITTLE CREEK NAVAL AMPHIBIOUS BASE:

INFORMATION WARFARE OPERATIONAL CONTROL CTR (DERF) ...... 5,370 5,370 ......................
48

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

NEW TRUCK ACCESS GATE (DERF) ................................................ 4,400 4,400 ......................

NORFOLK NAVAL SHIPYARD: SHIP COMPONENT SERVICE FACILITY ........ ...................... 16,810 ∂16,810

NORFOLK NAVAL STATION:

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE FACILITIES .............................................. 34,450 34,450 ......................

AIRFIELD RECAPITALIZATION .......................................................... 11,290 11,290 ......................

BACHELOR ENLISTED QRTS, SHIPBOARD ASHORE (PHASE I) ........ 37,310 37,310 ......................

GATE 2 SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS (DERF) .................................... 4,400 4,400 ......................

GATE 3A SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS (DERF) .................................. 4,005 4,005 ......................

GATE 5 SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS (DERF) .................................... 2,260 2,260 ......................

MAIN GATE SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS (DERF) .............................. 2,200 2,200 ......................

PIER REPLACEMENT (PHASE II) ..................................................... 33,520 33,520 ......................

SHORELINE SECURITY FENCING ..................................................... 2,030 2,030 ......................

UPGRADE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION (PHASE II) .......................... 25,160 25,160 ......................

OCEANA NAVAL AIR STATION:

AIRFIELD APPROACH LIGHTING ...................................................... 2,000 2,000 ......................

AIRFIELD PERIMETER SECURITY (DERF) ........................................ 10,500 10,500 ......................

POST 1 SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS (DERF) .................................... 3,990 3,990 ......................

PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD: ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE PROTECTION

IMPROVEMENTS .................................................................................. 19,660 19,660 ......................

QUANTICO MARINE CORPS BASE:

ARMORY/FLEET WEAPONS SUPPORT FACILITY ............................... 4,234 4,234 ......................

BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS ................................................... 10,280 10,280 ......................

BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS ADDITION ................................... 5,040 5,040 ......................

YORKTOWN NAVAL WEAPONS STATION: BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS REPLACEMENT ........................................................................... 15,020 15,020 ......................

AIR FORCE:

LANGLEY AFB:

AIR COMBAT COMMAND OPERATIONS SUPPORT CTR (DERF) ........ 24,000 24,000 ......................

DORMITORY .................................................................................... 8,320 8,320 ......................

F–22 FLIGHT SIMULATOR ............................................................... 8,120 8,120 ......................

F–22 INFRASTRUCTURE AND UTILITIES ......................................... 10,700 10,700 ......................

F–22 SQUADRON OPS/AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE UNIT ................... 20,800 20,800 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE:

ARLINGTON: LAND ACQUISITION .............................................................. 18,000 ...................... ¥18,000

RICHMOND DEFENSE SUPPLY CENTER: RENOVATE OPERATIONS CENTER ..................................................................................................... 5,500 5,500 ......................

FORT BELVOIR: DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION CENTER ......................... 50,188 50,188 ......................

LITTLE CREEK:

OPERATIONS TRAINER .................................................................... 4,400 4,400 ......................

SEAL TEAM OPERATIONS FACILITY ................................................. 9,900 9,900 ......................

QUANTICO MARINE CORPS BASE.

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION ............................... 1,272 1,272 ......................

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION (DERF) .................. 146 146 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: FORT PICKETT: MANUEVER & EQUIPMENT TRAINING SITE ....................................................................................................... ...................... 8,957 ∂8,957

ARMY RESERVE: FORT STORY: RESERVE CENTER/MAINT SHOP/UNHEATED

STORAGE ...................................................................................................... 12,385 12,385 ......................

NAVY RESERVE: NORFOLK: RESERVE CENTER ADDITION ................................ 4,770 4,770 ......................

TOTAL, VIRGINIA .................................................................................. 437,486 445,253 ∂7,767

WASHINGTON

ARMY:

FORT LEWIS:

BARRACKS COMPLEX—17TH & B STREET (PHASE II) .................. 50,000 50,000 ......................

BATTLE SIMULATION CENTER ......................................................... 24,000 24,000 ......................

COMBINED ARMS COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY ........................ 29,800 29,800 ......................

FENCING (DERF) ............................................................................. 2,395 2,395 ......................

NAVY:

BANGOR:

MISSILE SPARES STORAGE BUILDING ............................................ 7,340 7,340 ......................
49

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

RELOCATE ENCUMBERED WATERFRONT SHOPS ............................ 5,900 5,900 ......................

SMALL ARMS TRAINING CENTER (DERF) ........................................ 16,410 16,410 ......................

BREMERTON NAVAL STATION:

BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS, SHIPBOARD ASHORE ................ 35,120 35,120 ......................

SHIP MOVEMENTS OFFICE WITH CONTROL TOWER (DERF) ............ 2,200 2,200 ......................

WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION ....................................................... 8,550 8,550 ......................

PORT HADLOCK NAVAL MAGAZINE: AMMUNITION WHARF IMPROVEMENTS ................................................................................................. 4,030 4,030 ......................

PUGET SOUND NAVAL SHIPYARD:

ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE PROTECTION IMPROVEMENTS ................ 21,670 21,670 ......................

INDUSTRIAL WASTE TREATMENT FACILITY ..................................... 11,390 11,390 ......................

WATERFRONT SUPPORT FACILITIES ................................................ 21,072 21,072 ......................

WHIDBEY ISLAND NAVAL AIR STATION:

AIRCRAFT DIRECT REFUELING FACILITY ......................................... 9,180 9,180 ......................

AULT FIELD SECURITY FENCING (DERF) ........................................ 8,400 8,400 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: SPOKANE: READINESS CENTER (PHASE I) ............... ...................... 11,598 ∂11,598

TOTAL, WASHINGTON ........................................................................... 257,457 269,055 ∂11,598

WEST VIRGINIA

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:

LEWISBURG: READINESS CENTER ........................................................... ...................... 5,715 ∂5,715

SUMMERSVILLE: READINESS CENTER ..................................................... 6,800 6,800 ......................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: MARTINSBURG AIRBASE: SITE IMPROVEMENT AND

UTILITIES ...................................................................................................... ...................... 12,200 ∂12,200

TOTAL, WEST VIRGINIA ........................................................................ 6,800 24,715 ∂17,915

WISCONSIN

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:

CAMP WILLIAMS: UNITED STATES PROPERTY AND FISCAL OFFICE

WAREHOUSE ........................................................................................ 6,045 6,045 ......................

MADISON: UNITED STATES PROPERTY AND FISCAL OFFICE .................... 5,245 5,245 ......................

ARMY RESERVE:

FORT MCCOY:

BATTALION DINING FACILITY .......................................................... 5,117 5,117 ......................

BATTLE SIMULATION CENTER ......................................................... ...................... 3,863 ∂3,863

TOTAL, WISCONSIN ..................................................................... 16,407 20,270 ∂3,863

WYOMING

AIR FORCE: WARREN AFB: STORMWATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM ........................ ...................... 10,000 ∂10,000

NAVY RESERVE: CHEYENNE NAVAL RESERVE CENTER: HARDEN RESERVE

BUILDING (DERF) ......................................................................................... 1,240 1,240 ......................

TOTAL, WYOMING ................................................................................ 1,240 11,240 ∂10,000

BAHRAIN

NAVY: BAHRAIN NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY: INSTALLATION SERVICE SUPPORT

CENTER ........................................................................................................ 25,970 25,970 ......................

BELGIUM

ARMY: SHAPE HEADQUARTERS: BARRACKS COMPLEX—CHIEVRES ................ 13,600 13,600 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE:

SHAPE HEADQUARTERS:

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION ............................... 1,410 1,410 ......................

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION (DERF) .................. 163 163 ......................

TOTAL, BELGIUM ........................................................................ 15,173 15,173 ......................

CUBA

NAVY: GUANTANAMO BAY: SECURITY UPGRADES (DERF) ................................ 4,280 4,280 ......................
50

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

DIEGO GARCIA

NAVY:

DIEGO GARCIA NAVAL SUPPORT FACILITY:

PHYSICAL READINESS CENTER ...................................................... 8,370 8,370 ......................

WATERFRONT OPERATIONS SUPPORT FACILITY .............................. 2,720 2,720 ......................

AIR FORCE: DIEGO GARCIA: B–2 AIRCRAFT PARKING APRON ......................... 17,100 17,100 ......................

TOTAL, DIEGO GARCIA ........................................................................ 28,190 28,190 ......................

GERMANY

ARMY:

BAMBERG:

BARRACKS COMPLEX—WARNER BUILDING 7002 ......................... 10,200 10,200 ......................

CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ....................................................... 7,000 7,000 ......................

DARMSTADT: MODIFIED RECORD FIRE RANGE, AUTOMATED .................. 3,500 3,500 ......................

CAMPBELL BARRACKS: AT/FP BLAST MITIGATION WINDOWS (DERF) ...... 8,300 8,300 ......................

COLEMAN BARRACKS: ACCESS CONTROL FACILITY/PERIMETER SECURITY (DERF) ........................................................................................ 1,350 1,350 ......................

GRAFENWOEHR:

BRIGADE COMPLEX—UTILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE ........................ 46,666 46,666 ......................

BRIGADE COMPLEX-BARRACKS ...................................................... 13,200 13,200 ......................

BRIGADE COMPLEX-SITE PREPARATION ......................................... 10,000 10,000 ......................

LANDSTUHL:

ACCESS CONTROL FACILITIES (DERF) ............................................ 1,100 1,100 ......................

ACCESS CONTROL/PERIMETER SECURITY (DERF) .......................... 1,300 1,300 ......................

MANNHEIM: BARRACKS COMPLEX—COLEMAN BUILDING 18 ................. 42,000 42,000 ......................

SCHWEINFURT: CENTRAL VEHICLE WASH FACILITY ................................ 2,000 2,000 ......................

AIR FORCE:

RAMSTEIN AB:

COMBINED FLEET SERVICE/IN-FLIGHT KITCHEN ............................ 7,500 7,500 ......................

KMC CENTER SUPPORT .................................................................. 21,300 21,300 ......................

LARGE VEHICLE SECURITY INSPECTION STATION (DERF) .............. 1,600 1,600 ......................

PASSENGER TERMINAL ANNEX ....................................................... 17,683 17,683 ......................

RAMP 1 (PHASE I) .......................................................................... 23,700 23,700 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE:

RAMSTEIN AB:

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION ............................... 858 858 ......................

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION (DERF) .................. 99 99 ......................

SPANGDAHLEM AB:

HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT ............................................................... 39,629 39,629 ......................

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION ............................... 894 894 ......................

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION (DERF) .................. 103 103 ......................

TOTAL, GERMANY ....................................................................... 259,982 259,982 ......................

GREECE

NAVY: LARISSA: BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS AND SUPPORT FACILITY .... 14,800 ...................... ¥14,800

GUAM

NAVY: GUAM: BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS REPLACEMENT ...................... 13,400 13,400 ......................

AIR FORCE:

ANDERSEN AFB:

FITNESS CENTER ............................................................................ 16,000 16,000 ......................

REPLACE OFF-BASE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM (DERF) .................... 15,000 15,000 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE:

ANDERSEN AFB: REPLACE HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM (PHASE IV) ............ 17,586 17,586 ......................

GUAM: MARINE LOADING ARMS .............................................................. 6,000 6,000 ......................

TOTAL, GUAM ...................................................................................... 67,986 67,986 ......................
51

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

ICELAND

NAVY: KEFLAVIK NAVAL AIR STATION: COMBINED DINING FACILITY ................ 14,920 14,920 ......................

ITALY

ARMY:

VICENZA:

BARRACKS COMPLEX-CAMP EDERLE ............................................. 31,000 31,000 ......................

CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ....................................................... 3,700 3,700 ......................

NAVY:

SIGONELLA NAVAL AIR STATION:

OFF BASE ACCESS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS (DERF) ........................ 11,300 11,300 ......................

PARKING GARAGE AND PERIMETER SECURITY UPGRADE .............. 19,560 19,560 ......................

QUALITY OF LIFE SUPPORT (PHASE II) ........................................... 33,530 33,530 ......................

AIR FORCE:

AVIANO AB:

CONSOLIDATE AREA A–1/AREA A–2 FOR FORCE PRT (DERF) ....... 5,000 5,000 ......................

LARGE VEHICLE SECURITY INSPECTION STATION (DERF) .............. 1,600 1,600 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE:

NAPLES NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY: MEDICAL/DENTAL FACILITY REPLACEMENT ......................................................................................... 41,449 41,449 ......................

VICENZA:

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION ............................... 1,898 1,898 ......................

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION (DERF) .................. 219 219 ......................

TOTAL, ITALY .............................................................................. 149,256 149,256 ......................

JAPAN

AIR FORCE: KADENA AB: VISITOR AND TRAFFIC CNTRL FAC/SEC FENCING

(DERF) .......................................................................................................... 6,000 6,000 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: YOKOTA AB: BULK FUEL STORAGE TANKS ............................. 23,000 23,000 ......................

TOTAL, JAPAN ...................................................................................... 29,000 29,000 ......................

KOREA

ARMY:

CAMP CARROLL: BARRACKS COMPLEX ................................................... 20,000 20,000 ......................

CAMP CASTLE: PHYSICAL FITNESS TRAINING CENTER ........................... 6,800 6,800 ......................

CAMP HOVEY: BARRACKS COMPLEX ....................................................... 25,000 25,000 ......................

CAMP HUMPHREYS: BARRACKS COMPLEX .............................................. 36,000 36,000 ......................

CAMP HENRY: BARRACKS COMPLEX ....................................................... 10,200 10,200 ......................

K–16 AIRFIELD, YONGSAN: BARRACKS COMPLEX ................................... 40,000 40,000 ......................

YONGSAN ARMY GARRISON: C4I HARDENING, CAMP TANGO (DERF) ..... 12,600 12,600 ......................

AIR FORCE: OSAN AB: DORMITORY .................................................................. 15,100 15,100 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE:

SEOUL:

MIDDLE SCHOOL REPLACEMENT .................................................... 28,409 28,409 ......................

MIDDLE SCHOOL REPLACEMENT (DERF) ........................................ 3,274 3,274 ......................

TOTAL, KOREA ............................................................................ 197,383 197,383 ......................

PORTUGAL

DEFENSE-WIDE:

LAJES FIELD:

REPLACE HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM ................................................. 19,000 19,000 ......................

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION ............................... 1,069 1,069 ......................

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION (DERF) .................. 123 123 ......................

TOTAL, PORTUGAL ...................................................................... 20,192 20,192 ......................

QATAR

ARMY: QATAR: UNACCOMPANIED PERSONNEL HOUSING ................................. 8,600 8,600 ......................
52

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

SPAIN

NAVY:

MADRID: NAVY EXCHANGE/MORALE, WELFARE, RECREATION FAC ......... 2,890 ...................... ¥2,890

ROTA NAVAL STATION: SECURITY COMPLEX (DERF) ............................... 18,700 18,700 ......................

AIR FORCE: ROTA NAVAL STATION: AIRCRAFT PARKING APRON (PHASE I) ..... 31,818 31,818 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: ROTA NAVAL STATION: HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM .................... 23,400 23,400 ......................

TOTAL, SPAIN ...................................................................................... 76,808 73,918 ¥2,890

TURKEY

AIR FORCE: INCIRLIK AB: LARGE VEHICLE SECURITY INSPECTION STATION

(DERF) .......................................................................................................... 1,550 1,550 ......................

UNITED KINGDOM

AIR FORCE:

RAF FAIRFORD: B–2 MAINTENANCE HANGAR/APRON ............................. 19,000 19,000 ......................

RAF LAKENHEATH:

ADD/ALTER FITNESS CENTER ......................................................... 10,800 10,800 ......................

MOBILITY PROCESSING FACILITY ................................................... 2,600 2,600 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: RAF FAIRFORD: REPLACE HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM ............... 17,000 17,000 ......................

TOTAL, UNITED KINGDOM .................................................................... 49,400 49,400 ......................

WAKE ISLAND

AIR FORCE: WAKE ISLAND AIRFIELD: REPAIR AIRFIELD PAVEMENT (PHASE

I) .................................................................................................................. 24,900 24,900 ......................

NATO

NATO SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM ......................................................... 168,200 168,200 ......................

WORLDWIDE CLASSIFIED

AIR FORCE:

CLASSIFIED LOCATION:

C–17 VARIOUS FACILITIES ............................................................. 30,569 ...................... ¥30,569

CLASSIFIED MILCON PROJECT ........................................................ 1,993 1,993 ......................

VARIOUS FACILITIES/UTILITIES/INFRASTRUCTURE .......................... 23,000 23,000 ......................

TOTAL, WORLDWIDE CLASSIFIED ................................................ 55,562 24,993 ¥30,569

WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED

ARMY:

UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:

CIVILIAN PERSONNEL ACCRUAL ACCOUNTING ADJUSTMENT ......... ¥26,083 ¥26,083 ......................

CLASSIFIED PROJECT ...................................................................... 4,000 4,000 ......................

HOST NATION SUPPORT .................................................................. 23,700 23,700 ......................

IBCT TRANSFORMATION, VARIOUS FACILITIES ............................... ...................... 100,000 ∂100,000

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................. 119,824 122,114 ∂2,290

PLANNING AND DESIGN (DERF) ...................................................... 5,340 5,340 ......................

PLANNING & DESIGN (DERF) .......................................................... 9,381 9,381 ......................

UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................ 20,500 27,000 ∂6,500

RESCISSION (FOREIGN CURRENCY FLUCTUATION) ........................ ...................... ¥13,676 ¥13,676

NAVY:

UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:

CIVILIAN PERSONNEL ACCRUAL ACCOUNTING ADJUSTMENT ......... ¥10,470 ¥10,470 ......................

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................. 68,573 73,990 ∂5,417

PLANNING AND DESIGN (DERF) ...................................................... 17,630 17,630 ......................

UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................ 23,262 26,187 ∂2,925

HOST NATION INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................... 1,000 1,000 ......................

RESCISSION (FOREIGN CURRENCY FLUCTUATION) ........................ ...................... ¥1,340 ¥1,340
53

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

AIR FORCE:

VARIOUS WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:

C–17 TRANSFORMATION, VARIOUS FACILITIES .............................. ...................... 100,000 ∂100,000

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................. 41,496 65,758 ∂24,262

PLANNING AND DESIGN (DERF) ...................................................... 21,797 21,797 ......................

UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................ 11,500 12,620 ∂1,120

RESCISSION (FOREIGN CURRENCY FLUCTUATION) ........................ ...................... ¥10,281 ¥10,281

DEFENSE-WIDE:

UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:

CONTINGENCY CONSTRUCTION ...................................................... 10,000 10,000 ......................

ENERGY CONSERVATION INVESTMENT PROGRAM .......................... 49,531 49,531 ......................

RESCISSION (FOREIGN CURRENCY FLUCTUATION) ........................ ...................... ¥2,976 ¥2,976

PLANNING AND DESIGN:

TRICARE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY ................................................... 14,200 17,200 ∂3,000

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND ................................................... 4,932 5,032 ∂100

CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM ......................... 5,000 5,000 ......................

UNDISTRIBUTED .............................................................................. 20,000 28,557 ∂8,557

PLANNING AND DESIGN (DERF) ...................................................... ...................... 2,000 ∂2,000

SUBTOTAL, PLANNING AND DESIGN ........................................... 44,132 57,789 ∂13,657

UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION:

TRICARE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY ................................................... 3,363 3,363 ......................

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND ................................................... 2,000 2,000 ......................

DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE ............................. 1,500 1,500 ......................

JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF ................................................................. 6,430 6,430 ......................

UNDISTRIBUTED .............................................................................. 3,000 3,000 ......................

SUBTOTAL, UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION ..................... 16,293 16,293 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:

UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................. 14,724 29,543 ∂14,819

UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................ 4,930 13,399 ∂8,469

AIR NATIONAL GUARD:

UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................. 8,273 22,405 ∂14,132

PLANNING AND DESIGN (DERF) ...................................................... 683 683 ......................

UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................ 4,400 5,400 ∂1,000

ARMY RESERVE:

UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................. 6,965 10,810 ∂3,845

UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................ 2,850 2,850 ......................

NAVY RESERVE:

UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................. 2,509 2,509 ......................

PLANNING AND DESIGN (DERF) ...................................................... 377 377 ......................

UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................ 780 780 ......................

AIR FORCE RESERVE:

UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:

JUDGMENT FUND PAYMENT ............................................................ 11,900 11,900 ......................

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................. 3,656 3,863 ∂207

PLANNING AND DESIGN (DERF) ...................................................... 476 476 ......................

UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................ 5,160 5,960 ∂800

TOTAL, WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED ............................................. 519,089 790,259 ∂271,170

FAMILY HOUSING, ARMY

ALASKA: FORT WAINWRIGHT (38 UNITS) .......................................................... 17,752 17,752 ......................

ARIZONA: YUMA PROVING GROUND (33 UNITS) .............................................. 6,100 6,100 ......................

GERMANY: STUTTGART (1 UNIT) ...................................................................... 990 500 ¥490

KOREA: YONGSAN (10 UNITS) .......................................................................... 3,100 3,100 ......................
54

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS ...................................................................... 239,751 239,751 ......................

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................................... 15,653 15,653 ......................

RESCISSION (FOREIGN CURRENCY FLUCTUATION) .......................................... ...................... ¥4,920 ¥4,920

SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION ................................................................ 283,346 277,936 ¥5,410

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:

MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT ......................................................................... 91,567 91,567 ......................

SERVICES ACCOUNT ................................................................................ 41,846 41,846 ......................

FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT .......................................................................... 48,673 48,673 ......................

MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT ..................................................................... 1,321 1,321 ......................

UTILITIES ACCOUNT ................................................................................. 212,432 212,432 ......................

LEASING ................................................................................................... 215,251 215,251 ......................

MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY ........................................................ 485,257 485,257 ......................

INTEREST PAYMENT ................................................................................. 1 1 ......................

HOUSING PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT COSTS ............................................. 25,926 25,926 ......................

CIVILIAN PERSONNEL ACCRUAL ACCOUNTING ADJUSTMENT .................. ¥3,267 ¥3,267 ......................

SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ....................................... 1,119,007 1,119,007 ......................

TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, ARMY ......................................................... 1,402,353 1,396,943 ¥5,410

FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS

CALIFORNIA:

TWENTYNINE PALMS (76 UNITS) ............................................................. 19,425 19,425 ......................

LEMOORE (178 UNITS) ............................................................................ 40,981 40,981 ......................

CONNECTICUT: NEW LONDON (100 UNITS) ...................................................... 24,415 24,415 ......................

FLORIDA: MAYPORT (1 UNIT) ........................................................................... 329 329 ......................

HAWAII: KANEOHE BAY (65 UNITS) .................................................................. 24,797 24,797 ......................

MISSISSIPPI: MERIDIAN (56 UNITS) ................................................................. 9,755 9,755 ......................

NORTH CAROLINA: CAMP LEJEUNE (317 UNITS) .............................................. 43,650 43,650 ......................

VIRGINIA: QUANTICO (290 UNITS) .................................................................... 41,843 41,843 ......................

GREECE: LARISSA (2 UNITS) ............................................................................ 1,232 ...................... ¥1,232

UNITED KINGDOM: ST MAWGAN (62 UNITS) ..................................................... 18,524 18,524 ......................

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS ...................................................................... 139,468 139,468 ......................

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................................... 11,281 11,281 ......................

RESCISSION (FOREIGN CURRENCY FLUCTUATION) .......................................... ...................... ¥2,652 ¥2,652

SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION ................................................................ 375,700 371,816 ¥3,884

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:

FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT .......................................................................... 30,344 30,344 ......................

MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT ......................................................................... 82,114 82,114 ......................

MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT ..................................................................... 913 913 ......................

SERVICES ACCOUNT ................................................................................ 62,583 62,583 ......................

UTILITIES ACCOUNT ................................................................................. 174,219 174,219 ......................

LEASING ................................................................................................... 129,085 129,085 ......................

MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY ........................................................ 381,388 381,388 ......................

INTEREST PAYMENT ................................................................................. 71 71 ......................

HOUSING PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT COSTS ............................................. 7,071 7,071 ......................

SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ....................................... 867,788 867,788 ......................

TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS ........................ 1,243,488 1,239,604 ¥3,884

FAMILY HOUSING, AIR FORCE

ARIZONA: LUKE AFB (140 UNITS) .................................................................... 18,954 18,954 ......................

CALIFORNIA: TRAVIS AFB (110 UNITS) ............................................................. 24,320 24,320 ......................

COLORADO:

PETERSON AFB (2 UNITS) ....................................................................... 959 959 ......................

U.S. AIR FORCE ACADEMY (71 UNITS) ................................................... 12,424 12,424 ......................

DELAWARE: DOVER AFB (112 UNITS) .............................................................. 19,615 19,615 ......................
55

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

FLORIDA:

EGLIN AFB (HOUSING OFFICE) ................................................................ 597 597 ......................

EGLIN AFB (134 UNITS) .......................................................................... 15,906 15,906 ......................

MACDILL AFB (96 UNITS) ........................................................................ 18,086 18,086 ......................

HAWAII: HICKAM AFB (96 UNITS) ..................................................................... 29,050 29,050 ......................

IDAHO: MOUNTAIN HOME AFB (95 UNITS) ....................................................... 24,392 24,392 ......................

KANSAS: MCCONNELL AFB (MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND ROADS) ................ 1,514 1,514 ......................

MARYLAND:

ANDREWS AFB (53 UNITS) ...................................................................... 9,838 9,838 ......................

ANDREWS AFB (52 UNITS) ...................................................................... 8,807 8,807 ......................

MISSOURI: WHITEMAN AFB (22 UNITS) ............................................................ 3,977 3,977 ......................

MISSISSIPPI:

COLUMBUS AFB (MANAGEMENT OFFICE) ................................................ 412 412 ......................

KEESLER AFB (117 UNITS) ...................................................................... 16,505 16,505 ......................

MONTANA: MALMSTROM AFB (18 UNITS) ......................................................... 4,717 4,717 ......................

NORTH CAROLINA:

POPE AFB (HOUSING MAINTENANCE BUILDING) ..................................... 991 991 ......................

SEYMOUR JOHNSON AFB (126 UNITS) .................................................... 18,615 18,615 ......................

NORTH DAKOTA:

GRAND FORKS AFB (150 UNITS) ............................................................. 30,140 30,140 ......................

MINOT AFB (112 UNITS) .......................................................................... 21,428 21,428 ......................

MINOT AFB (102 UNITS) .......................................................................... 20,315 20,315 ......................

NEW MEXICO: HOLLOMAN AFB (101 UNITS) .................................................... 20,161 20,161 ......................

OKLAHOMA: VANCE AFB (59 UNITS) ................................................................ 11,423 11,423 ......................

SOUTH DAKOTA:

ELLSWORTH AFB (HOUSING MAINTENANCE FACILITY) ............................ 447 447 ......................

ELLSWORTH AFB (22 UNITS) ................................................................... 4,794 4,794 ......................

TEXAS:

DYESS AFB (85 UNITS) ........................................................................... 14,824 14,824 ......................

RANDOLPH AFB (HOUSING MAINTENANCE OFFICE) ................................. 447 447 ......................

RANDOLPH AFB (112 UNITS) ................................................................... 14,311 14,311 ......................

VIRGINIA: LANGLEY AFB (HOUSING MAINTENANCE OFFICE) ............................ 1,193 1,193 ......................

GERMANY: RAMSTEIN AB (19 UNITS) .............................................................. 8,534 8,534 ......................

KOREA:

OSAN AB (FURNISHINGS MANAGEMENT OFFICE) .................................... 834 834 ......................

OSAN AB (113 UNITS) ............................................................................. 35,705 35,705 ......................

UNITED KINGDOM: RAF LAKENHEATH (HOUSING MAINTENANCE FACILITY) ...... 2,203 2,203 ......................

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS ...................................................................... 226,068 226,068 ......................

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................................... 34,188 34,188 ......................

RESCISSION (FOREIGN CURRENCY FLUCTUATION) .......................................... ...................... ¥8,782 ¥8,782

SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION ................................................................ 676,694 667,912 ¥8,782

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:

AT/FP FACILITY UPGRADES (DERF) ......................................................... 29,631 29,631 ......................

FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT .......................................................................... 35,619 35,619 ......................

MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT ......................................................................... 48,473 48,473 ......................

SERVICES ACCOUNT ................................................................................ 25,178 25,178 ......................

UTILITIES ACCOUNT ................................................................................. 132,945 132,945 ......................

MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT ..................................................................... 1,511 1,511 ......................

LEASING ................................................................................................... 103,690 103,690 ......................

MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY ........................................................ 476,485 476,485 ......................

INTEREST PAYMENT ................................................................................. 36 36 ......................

HOUSING PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT COSTS ............................................. 20,482 20,482 ......................

SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ....................................... 874,050 874,050 ......................

TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, AIR FORCE ................................................. 1,550,744 1,541,962 ¥8,782

FAMILY HOUSING, DEFENSE-WIDE

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS ...................................................................... 5,480 5,480 ......................
56

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:

FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT (NSA) ................................................................ 120 120 ......................

FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT (DIA) ................................................................. 3,689 3,689 ......................

FURNISHINGS (DLA) ................................................................................. 26 26 ......................

MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT (NSA) ............................................................... 15 15 ......................

MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT (DLA) ............................................................... 308 308 ......................

MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT (NSA) ........................................................... 58 58 ......................

SERVICES ACCOUNT (NSA) ...................................................................... 339 339 ......................

SERVICES ACCOUNT (DLA) ...................................................................... 76 76 ......................

UTILITIES ACCOUNT (NSA) ....................................................................... 407 407 ......................

UTILITIES ACCOUNT (DLA) ....................................................................... 410 410 ......................

LEASING (NSA) ........................................................................................ 9,643 9,643 ......................

LEASING (DIA) ......................................................................................... 26,220 26,220 ......................

MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY (NSA) .............................................. 611 611 ......................

MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY (DLA) .............................................. 510 510 ......................

CIVILIAN PERSONNEL ACCRUAL ACCOUNTING ADJ (DLA) ....................... ¥37 ¥37 ......................

SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ....................................... 42,395 42,395 ......................

TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, DEFENSE-WIDE .......................................... 47,875 47,875 ......................

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FAMILY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FAMILY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND ................ 2,000 2,000 ......................

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT ................................................ 545,138 645,138 ∂100,000

GRAND TOTAL ..................................................................................... 9,664,041 10,622,000 ∂957,959

RECAPITULATION

ARMY ................................................................................................................ 1,450,438 1,456,747 ∂6,309

DEFENSE EMERGENCY RESPONSE FUND (DERF) .................................... 222,465 222,465 ......................

RESCISSION ............................................................................................. ...................... ¥13,676 ¥13,676

NAVY ................................................................................................................. 884,661 995,913 ∂111,252

DEFENSE EMERGENCY RESPONSE FUND (DERF) .................................... 220,730 220,730 ......................

RESCISSION ............................................................................................. ...................... ¥1,340 ¥1,340

AIR FORCE ........................................................................................................ 644,090 987,320 ∂343,230

DEFENSE EMERGENCY RESPONSE FUND (DERF) .................................... 190,597 188,297 ¥2,300

RESCISSION ............................................................................................. ...................... ¥10,281 ¥10,281

DEFENSE-WIDE ................................................................................................. 740,535 895,942 ∂155,407

DEFENSE EMERGENCY RESPONSE FUND (DERF) .................................... 31,300 31,300 ......................

RESCISSION ............................................................................................. ...................... ¥2,976 ¥2,976

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD ................................................................................... 101,595 208,482 ∂106,887

AIR NATIONAL GUARD ...................................................................................... 53,473 209,055 ∂155,582

DEFENSE EMERGENCY RESPONSE FUND (DERF) .................................... 8,933 8,933 ......................

ARMY RESERVE ................................................................................................ 58,779 66,487 ∂7,708

NAVAL RESERVE ............................................................................................... 51,554 51,554 ......................

DEFENSE EMERGENCY RESPONSE FUND (DERF) .................................... 7,117 7,117 ......................

AIR FORCE RESERVE ........................................................................................ 31,900 54,633 ∂22,733

DEFENSE EMERGENCY RESPONSE FUND (DERF) .................................... 6,076 3,576 ¥2,500

TOTAL, MILITARY CONSTRUCTION ....................................................... 4,704,243 5,580,278 ∂876,035

NATO INFRASTRUCTURE ................................................................................... 168,200 168,200 ......................

FAMILY HOUSING, ARMY .................................................................................. 1,402,353 1,396,943 ¥5,410

(CONSTRUCTION) ..................................................................................... (283,346) (282,856) (¥490)

(RESCISSION) ................................................................................. ...................... (¥4,920) (¥4,920)

(OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE) ............................................................ (1,119,007) (1,119,007) ......................

FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS ................................................. 1,243,488 1,239,604 ¥3,884

(CONSTRUCTION) ..................................................................................... (375,700) (374,468) (¥1,232)

(RESCISSION) ................................................................................. ...................... (¥2,652) (¥2,652)
57

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

(OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE) ............................................................ (867,788) (867,788) ......................

FAMILY HOUSING, AIR FORCE .......................................................................... 1,550,744 1,541,962 ¥8,782

(CONSTRUCTION) ..................................................................................... (676,694) (676,694) ......................

(RESCISSION) ................................................................................. ...................... (¥8,782) (¥8,782)

(OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE) ............................................................ (844,419) (844,419) ......................

(DEFENSE EMERGENCY RESPONSE FUND) (DERF) ........................ (29,631) (29,631) ......................

FAMILY HOUSING, DEFENSE-WIDE .................................................................... 47,875 47,875 ......................

(CONSTRUCTION) ..................................................................................... (5,480) (5,480) ......................

(OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE) ............................................................ (42,395) (42,395) ......................

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FAMILY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND ................ 2,000 2,000 ......................

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT ................................................ 545,138 645,138 ∂100,000

GRAND TOTAL ..................................................................................... 9,664,041 10,622,000 ∂957,959

Æ