alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.2**











CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of South Jersey
      Gas Company (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, David A. Kindlick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      David
      A. Kindlick


-------------------------------------------------------


Name:
      David A. Kindlick


Title:
      Chief Financial Officer


November
      9, 2006
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHRISTOPHER JAMES HENSON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

CORIZON HEALTH, INC.; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

STEWART, Unknown; et al., 

Defendants.

No. 20-15117 

D.C. No. 2:19-cv-04396-MTLDMF 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Michael T. Liburdi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 6, 2020**

Before: BERZON, N.R. SMITH, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 14 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-15117 

Arizona state prisoner Christopher James Henson appeals pro se from the 

district court’s orders denying his motions for a preliminary injunction and his 

motion for reconsideration of the denial of a preliminary injunction in his 42 

U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations. We have jurisdiction under 

28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). We review for an abuse of discretion. Jackson v. City &

County of San Francisco, 746 F.3d 953, 958 (9th Cir. 2014) (denial of preliminary

injunction); Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 

1262 (9th Cir. 1993) (denial of reconsideration). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Henson’s motions 

for a preliminary injunction because Henson failed to demonstrate that such relief 

is warranted. See Jackson, 746 F.3d at 958 (plaintiff seeking preliminary 

injunction must establish that he is likely to succeed on the merits, likely to suffer 

irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, the balance of equities tips in 

his favor, and an injunction is in the public interest).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Henson’s motion 

for reconsideration because Henson failed to demonstrate any basis for such 

relief. See Sch. Dist. No. 1J, 5 F.3d at 1263 (grounds for relief under Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 59(e)).

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on 

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).
3 20-15117 

AFFIRMED.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

___________

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 33-60495) and Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-57501, 333-70229, 333-86037 and 333-86153)**of Alpharma Inc. of our report dated March 27, 2002 relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K.
 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Florham Park, New Jersey

March 27, 2002**
-------------------
   EXHIBIT 32.1
-------------------


         --------------------------------------------------------------
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
         --------------------------------------------------------------



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of USURF America,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Douglas O.
McKinnon,  President and CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code), that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



Dated: August 19, 2003                       /s/ DOUGLAS O. MCKINNON
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Douglas O. McKinnon
                                             President and CEO
From: Mimi Shapiro

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:18:01 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

If women had real access to contraception - maybe their would not be abortions! For the life of me I

cannot figure put why men and christians are against birth control ?

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Mimi Shapiro

239 North Concord Street

lancaster, PA 17603
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of USURF America, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date:  November 20, 2003                    By: /s/  Douglas O. McKinnon
                                            --------------------------------
                                            Name:    Kenneth W. Brand
                                            Title:   Chief Executive Officer


Date:  November 20, 2003                    By: /s/  Christopher Brenner
                                            --------------------------------
                                            Name:    Christopher Brenner
                                            Title:   Chief Financial Officer


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to USURF America,
Inc. and will be retained by USURF America, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
2/12/2016

From: Cogliano, Gerain
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 1:08 PM
To: Jones, Danielle < Danielle_Y_Jones@omb.eop.gov > Subject: EO 12866 Review of RMP NPRM

--- Outline of New Section in RM P RIA Importance: High

Attachments:

Hi Danielle,

Attached is an outline for a new section in Chapter 5 of the RIA to address OMB's concerns. If possible, it would be extremely helpful if we could get feedback either later today or first thing Tuesday on whether the outlined approach satisfies OMB's concerns so that we can draft the section.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Thanks!

GerainAttachment: Outline fo r new Section 5.7 to be inserted before Total Costs at the end of Chapter 5

Outline fo r new Section 5.7 to be inserted before Total Costs at the end of Chapter 5

2/12/2016 

## 5.7 Cost Uncertainties Associated with Prevention Program Provisions

Introduction

 This section examines uncertainties associated with costs of actions that may result from the information gathered and/or analyzed in the proposed prevention program requirements

 Discuss the targeting of these provisions to failure of a prevention program (either applying after an RMP accident or in a sector with high accident rates)

Third

- Party Au dit

 Purpose of compliance audits and potential for actions resulting from information evaluated by a third

- party

o Audits identify deficiencies with Program 2 or Program 3 RMP rule requirements

o Bias of auditing could impact information gathered

 Potential for expenditures

- Include e xamples of audits that could lead to expenditures to correct deficiencies with the rule

 Discuss how and whether expenditures should accrue to the rule

 Request for comment
Incident Investigation/Root Cause

 Purpose of existing incident investigation requirements and proposed root cause analysis requirements

 Potential for expenditures

- Include e xamples of investigation findings from the root cause analysis that might involve alternative or additional expenditu res

 Discuss how and whether expenditures should accrue to the rule

 Request for comment

STAA

 Purpose of the proposed provision to analyze safer alternatives and feasibility

 Potential for additional voluntary capital expenditures

o Discuss wide variability in potential costs

o Examples of STAA implementation

 Discuss how and whether expenditures should accrue to the rule

 Request for comment

Preamble will include a summary of this section and refer to the RIA for further information. The preamble will request data, studies/analyses and costs that could assist EPA in determining how to accrue costs for these provisions in the rule.
#### Charles C. Clausen, Appellant, *v.*Herrmann Realty Company, Respondent.

*Clausen*v. *Nerrmann Realty Co.,*140 App. Div. 910, modified.

(Argued May 16, 1912;

decided June 4, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 3, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term in an action to cancel a certain contract of guaranty.

*Edward W. S. Johnston*for appellant.

*Harold Swain*and *Henry L. Moses*for respondent.

*622Judgment modified by striking out the words *“*on the merits,” and as modified affirmed, without costs in this court; no opinion.

• Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hisgock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*John E. Schultz, Appellant.

Reported below, 149 App. Div. 844.

(Argued April 29, 1912;

decided May 7, 1912.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 15, 1912, which affirmed a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the city of New York convicting the defendant of the crime of usury.

The motion was made upon the grounds that affirmance by the Appellate Division was unanimous and that the exceptions were frivolous.

*James O. Cropsey, District Attorney {Henry Egginton*of counsel), for motion.

*Ernest P. Seelman*opposed.

Motion denied.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF
  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
  PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Garry L. Anselmo, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
  Officer of Silverado Gold Mines Ltd., (the “Company”), hereby certify
  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company
        for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004 (the “Annual Report”)
        fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
        of operations of the Company.                                                                                     

| | By:    | /s/ Garry L. Anselmo       
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | Garry L. Anselmo           
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | May 25, 2005               

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
  and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on
  Form 10-KSB. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company
  and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
  10-KSB pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
  except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
  purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
  "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
  reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
  Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates
  it by reference.

---
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case No. COMP/M.3446-UNIQA / Mannheimer)

(2004/C 147/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

----
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-15-00015-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.E.S., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 76th District Court

Titus County, Texas

Trial Court No. 37,180

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Appellant Father appeals from the termination of his parental rights to L.E.S. The clerk’s 

record in this accelerated appeal was filed February 27, 2015, and the reporter’s record was filed 

March 31, 2015, making Father’s brief due April 20, 2015. Having received neither Father’s brief 

nor a motion to extend the deadline for filing that brief, our clerk’s office contacted counsel via 

email and voicemail, advising that Father’s brief was late and that a motion for extension of time 

in which to file such brief had not been filed. Counsel did not to respond to these messages, has 

not filed a brief, and has not filed a motion for extension of time in which to file a brief. 

This is an appeal from the termination of Father’s parental rights to L.E.S., which, by 

statute, is accelerated. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 109.002(a) (West 2014). Further, under Rule 

6.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Judicial Administration, we are required, “so far as reasonably 

possible, [to] ensure that the appeal is brought to final disposition” within 180 days of the date the 

notice of appeal was filed. See TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2, reprinted in TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. tit. 

2, subtit. F app. (West 2013). After weighing these considerations, we feel compelled to order the 

brief filed. 

By this order, we set the final deadline for filing appellant’s brief as May 11, 2015, which 

gives counsel twenty-one days from the original due date to complete the brief. Should appellant 

fail to file a brief on or before May 11, 2015, this appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: April 28, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS ON
FORM 10-KSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      10,709,370
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,411,985
<ALLOWANCES>                                   107,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,862,933
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,229,236
<PP&E>                                      14,640,003
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,621,001
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,363,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,510,875
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,189
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,814,402
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,363,465
<SALES>                                      2,995,240
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,900,768
<CGS>                                        3,213,643
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,281,017
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (101,245)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,436,695
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,070,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,366,695
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,366,695
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.64


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                Certification of the Principal Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  of A.B.  Watley  Group  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended June 30, 2002,  as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert
Malin,  the  Principal  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,  hereby  certifies,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                                  /s/ Robert Malin
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Robert Malin
                                                  Principal Financial Officer
                                                  Date:  April 15, 2003


                                      -29-
<PAGE>