alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Joe Martens

Commissioner

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

Division of Environmental Remediation

Office of the Director, 12th Floor

625 Broadway, Albany, New York 12233-7011

Phone: (518) 402-9706 • Fax: (518) 402-9020

Website: www.dec.ny.gov

SENT VIA EMAIL ONLY August 29, 2013

Mr. Walter Mugdan (mugdan.walter@epa.gov)

Director

Emergency & Remedial Response Division

United States Environmental Protection Agency

290 Broadway, 19th Floor, E38

New York, New York 10007-1866

Re: Proposed Deletion from the National Priority List

Ludlow Sand and Gravel, Site No. 633014

Town of Paris, Oneida County

Dear Mr. Mugdan:

The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) has received the 

United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Notice of Intent to Delete the Ludlow 

Sand and Gravel Site (site), EPA ID No. NYD013468939, DEC Site No. 633014, from the 

National Priorities List (NPL). During this deletion process, in accordance with Section

300.425(e) of the National Contingency Plan, the EPA must, “consult with the state on proposed 

deletions from the NPL.” Upon review of the site’s final construction and closeout 

documentation, DEC finds that the remedies are performing as expected and are effective.

Further, an Environmental Easement has been executed and filed with the County Clerk.

The EPA Final Closeout Report documents that the remedial actions selected for the site, 

documented in Records of Decision for operable units one and two, were implemented by the 

EPA and DEC in accordance with these decision documents.

Please be informed that this site will remain on the New York State Registry of Inactive 

Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites as one that has been remediated and/or closed, but requires 

continued site management (e.g., maintenance and monitoring). With this understanding, DEC

concurs with the proposed deletion of the Ludlow Sand and Gravel Superfund site from the 

National Priorities List.

If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Robert Cozzy at (518) 402-9768.

Sincerely,

Robert W. Schick, P.E.

Director

Division of Environmental Remediation

ec: P.Mannino, EPA (mannino.pietro@epa.gov)

T. Mongelli, EPA (mongelli.thomas@epa.gov)

D. Garbarini, EPA (Garbarini.Doug@epa.gov)

I. Rodrigues, EPA (Rodrigues.Isabel@epa.gov)

K. Anders/G. Rys, DOH 

M. Ryan/R. Cozzy, DEC

S. Edwards/K. Lewandowski/J. Brown/ K. Sarnowicz, DEC
{In Archive} McElmo Creek - PSD Permit

Shirley Rivera to: pflynn, thormel, justin.j.harrison 12/05/2007 05:01 PM

Cc: Shaheerah Kelly

From: Shirley Rivera/R9/USEPA/US

To: pflynn@rnrc.net, thormel@mcvehil-monnett.com, justin.j.harrison@exxonmobil.com, 

Cc: Shaheerah Kelly/R9/USEPA/US@EPA

Archive: This message is being viewed in an archive.

All,

Thanks for this opportunity to touch base with you all via e-mail. I have either spoken with you directly or 

have left a voice mail message (with the intent of speaking with you). 

Contact info: Below is my contact information. In short, I am working on drafting up the PSD permit, and I 

am also making sure to work/talk with Ms. Shaheerah Kelly, who will be following-up with efforts for the 

Part 71 permit.

Information exchange/Communications: I'd like to make sure that communications are open and 

information is flowing amongst us all, as needed, so that any follow-up clarification that we'd need for 

processing the permits can be readily addressed. 

That said, given my recent involvement for preparing the PSD permit, my intent is as follows:

 a) Primary contact person (s) - Please confirm, between ExxonMobil and Resolute, who are the primary 

contact person(s). If there is/are other contact person(s) or back-up/assistants (particularly during the 

upcoming holiday season) to keep in the loop, definitely do let us know.

 b) Permit processing status - Unless otherwise directed, ExxonMobil and Resolute will **each** be kept 

updated of status, concurrently. At this point, if there is/are other contact person(s) or back-up/assistants 

(particularly during the upcoming holiday season) to keep in the loop, definitely do let us know.

 c) Data needs requests/clarification - Unless otherwise directed, I will start with Resolute, given Resolute 

is the current operator/owner of McElmo, to obtain data and clarification needed for any PSD permit 

efforts. 

 d) Consultant involvement - Please provide confirmation regarding McVehil-Monnett's continued support 

on this effort.

 e) Special considerations - If there is/are other special considerations of which you'd like me to be aware, 

please do let me know.

Thanks much,

 - Shirl

-------------------------------------------

Shirley F. Rivera

U.S. EPA, Region 9, Air Permits Office (AIR-3)

T: (415) 972-3966 | F: (415) 947-3579

 75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105

 Rivera.Shirley@epa.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 549 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 549

Expressing appreciation for the Prime Minister of Great Britain for his 
 loyal support and leadership in the war on terrorism and reaffirming 
  the strong relationship between the people of the United States and 
                             Great Britain.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 24, 2002

 Mr. Graves submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing appreciation for the Prime Minister of Great Britain for his 
 loyal support and leadership in the war on terrorism and reaffirming 
  the strong relationship between the people of the United States and 
                             Great Britain.

Whereas the people of the United States and Great Britain have a history of 
        shared values and mutual respect for one another;
Whereas the Governments of the United States and Great Britain are close allies 
        and share a deep and abiding friendship based on a shared commitment to 
        democratic values;
Whereas the United States and Great Britain understand the commitment to defend 
        freedom and democracy regardless of the costs involved;
Whereas British Prime Minister Tony Blair has displayed exceptional leadership 
        in the war on terrorism; and
Whereas the United States and Great Britain have been provoked into a war on 
        terrorism that threatens the security of both nations: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) expresses sincere appreciation for Prime Minister Tony 
        Blair for his leadership in the war on terrorism;
            (2) expresses its deepest sympathy to British victims of 
        terrorism and their families, including the 67 British citizens 
        who were victims of the terrorist attack on September 11, 2001;
            (3) commends the efforts of British intelligence and 
        defense agencies for their continued efforts in the war on 
        terrorism; and
            (4) reaffirms the strong and special relationship between 
        the people of the United States and Great Britain.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 406 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 406

 Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifice made by 
 the men and women killed or disabled while serving as peace officers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2002

Mr. Hefley (for himself, Mr. Ramstad, Mr. Stupak, Mr. Conyers, and Mr. 
 Sensenbrenner) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifice made by 
 the men and women killed or disabled while serving as peace officers.

Whereas the well-being of all people of the United States is preserved and 
        enhanced as a direct result of the vigilance and dedication of law 
        enforcement personnel;
Whereas more than 700,000 law enforcement personnel, at great risk to their 
        personal safety, serve their fellow citizens as guardians of peace;
Whereas peace officers are on the front line in preserving the right of the 
        children of the United States to receive an education in a crime-free 
        environment, a right that is all too often threatened by the insidious 
        fear caused by violence in schools;
Whereas 70 peace officers died at the World Trade Center in New York City on 
        September 11, 2001, the most peace officers ever killed in a single 
        incident in the history of the Nation;
Whereas more than 220 peace officers across the Nation were killed in the line 
        of duty during 2001, which represents 57 percent more police fatalities 
        than the previous year and makes 2001 the deadliest year for the law 
        enforcement community since 1974;
Whereas every year, 1 out of every 9 peace officers is assaulted, 1 out of every 
        25 peace officers is injured, and 1 out of every 4,400 peace officers is 
        killed in the line of duty; and
Whereas on May 15, 2002, more than 15,000 peace officers are expected to gather 
        in Washington, D.C. to join with the families of their recently fallen 
        comrades to honor those comrades and all others who went before them: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That--
            (1) it is the sense of the House that there should be 
        established a Peace Officers Memorial Day in honor of Federal, 
        State, and local peace officers killed or disabled in the line 
        of duty; and
            (2) the House calls upon the people of the United States to 
        observe such a day with appropriate ceremonies and respect.
                                 <all>
```
Domtar Ashdown Mill- Power Boiler No. 2

Cost of Increasing the Control Efficiency of Existing Scrubbers to 90% through Use of Additional Scrubbing Reagent:

Total Capital Investment

Pump Upgrade (2 new pumps, piping, and electrical)* $200,000

Capital Recovery Factor (CRF) 

CRF = [I x (1+i)^a]/[(1+i)^a - 1], where I = interest rate, a = equipment life

a= 30 year equipment life, I = 7% interest

CRF = 0.0806

Operation & Maintenance Costs:

Cost of Scrubbing Reagent

Maximum Month (2011-2013)

12.72 TPD SO2 Loading

11.448 = 90% removal requirement

22,896 = lbs NaOH per lb SO2 to be removed/ day

$5,472.14/day @ $0.24/ lb NaOH 

Annual Cost of Additional Scrubbing Reagent* $1,942,611.12

Wastewater Treament Cost

3,984,353 gallons/year

$0.22 /k gallon

Annual Wastewater Treatment Cost* $856.64

Raw Water Treatment Cost

3,984,353 gallons/year

$270.17/ MMGal

Annual Raw Water Treatment Cost* $1,076.45

Energy cost

25 hp/pump

50 hp (2 pumps)

37.3 kW (1hp = 0.746 kW) @ $0.05 / kWh

Annual Energy Cost* $15,889.80

Annualized Capital Cost

Capital Recovery Factor * Total Capital Investment $16,120

Total Annual Cost $1,976,554.09

* These are cost estimates provided by Domtar in the September 30, 2014 supplemental response letter to Region 6.
From: Cindy Siebrecht [mailto:cindy.siebrecht@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 8:49 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN-1210-AB39 Department of Labor

Please acknowledge my support of the proposed ERISA regulations which would 

provide those employees who claim disability benefits under their LTD plan with 

additional procedural protections and safeguards that would afford some claimants 

benefits that would otherwise have been improperly denied, as happens all too often.

Sincerely

Cindy Siebrecht
<PAGE>   1



EXHIBIT 24

    

<PAGE>   2



                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

     Each of the undersigned directors and officers of Cross Medical Products,
Inc. (the "Corporation") whose signature appears below hereby appoints Edward R.
Funk or Joseph A. Mussey, or either of them, as his attorney-in-fact to sign, in
his name and behalf and in any and all capacities stated below, and to cause to
be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Corporation's Annual
Report on Form 10-K (the "Annual Report") for the fiscal year ended December 31,
1996, and likewise to sign and file any amendments, including post-effective
amendments, to the Annual Report, hereby granting unto such attorneys and each
of them full power and authority to do and perform in the name and on behalf off
the undersigned, and in any and all such capacities, every act and thing
whatsoever necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully as the
undersigned could or might do in person, hereby granting to such
attorney-in-fact full power of substitution and revocation, and hereby ratifying
all that such attorney-in-fact or his substitute may do by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Power of Attorney in
counterparts if necessary, effective as of March 20, 1997.

DIRECTORS/OFFICERS:

SIGNATURE                             TITLE
---------                             -----

/s/ Joseph A. Mussey                  President, Chief Executive Officer, and
----------------------------          Treasurer
Joseph A. Mussey                      (Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Paul A. Miller                    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
----------------------------          (Principal Accounting Officer)
Paul A. Miller                        

/s/ Edward R. Funk                    Chairman of the Board of Directors
----------------------------
Edward R. Funk, Ph.D.

/s/ Daniel A. Funk                    Director
----------------------------
Daniel A. Funk, M.D.

/s/ Daniel A. Gregorie                Director
----------------------------
Daniel A. Gregorie, M.D.

/s/ Herbert J. Kahn                   Director
----------------------------
Herbert J. Kahn

                            

<PAGE>   3




/s/ Curtis A. Loveland                Director
----------------------------
Curtis A. Loveland

/s/ C. Craig Waldbillig               Director
----------------------------
C. Craig Waldbillig

/s/ Peter H. Williams                 Director
----------------------------
Peter H. Williams

/s/ Robert J. Williams                Director
----------------------------
Robert J. Williams
August 10,2010 

Office ofConsumer Information and Insurance Oversight 


Department ofHealth and Human Services 


Attention: OCII0-9991-IFC 


P.O. Box 8016 


Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 


Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating 


to Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable 


Care Act 


Below -, are my comments regardingJh~ Interim HnaLRule for Group Health Plans~and ­

Health Insmance Co~erage Relating to Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the 


Patient Protection' and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). 


I believe that every effort should be made to increase the number ofindividuals covered 


by PPACA, especially as ofJanuary 1,2014 when most ofthe reform components 


(Insurance Exchanges, Subsidies. Tax Credits, etc.) come into play. 


The average consumer has a broad definition of "benefits." Consumers view their health 


plan beyond the covered benefits, cost sharing, and the contribution levels associated with 


the plan. 


It is my opinion that the Rule may still result in some confusion to the marketplace in its 


application. For example, if an employer raised the copayment level beyond the 


maximum in one area (Le. outpatient services) but retained the copayment level for 


primary care doctor visits, does that mean a loss of grandfather status? Clarity will be 


critical both for the employer and the employee. 


Even by the most optimistic estimates, a substantial portion ofthe employee population 

will remain outside the PPACA as ofJanuary 2014 based on the current rules. While I 

_..!!.Ilderstand the difficulty involved in making change, creating another large sub­

"'population of exCluded iIiaividuals'will only add-to costs, increase-confusion,.and. _ .__" 

mitigate the potential impact ofthe legislation. 

The Rule needs to be clear, reasonable, and with no ambiguities involved in determining 


whether a group health plan is "in or out." The decisions the federal government makes 


today will determine the outcomes for tomorrow. We may need to make some difficult 


decisions to create a sustainable health care system that will support a growing economy 


in the future. That means getting as many citizens across the country participating at the 


beginning to make it work and delivering on its promises to retain their support. 


Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this regulation. :t::;:"Y Brian K. Bowcock. 

~f 

D.C. 

opract~ 

~~
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                      PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>          548,249
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>          2,295
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>             113,799
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>           115,955
<OTHER-ASSETS>                         376
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     780,674
<COMMON>                             5,848
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>          125,817
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                 60,634
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>     192,299
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               35,000
<PREFERRED>                          1,804
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>               207,123
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                  93,800
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>           0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>       11,876
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>              0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                         0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>     238,772
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      780,674
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>          287,498
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                 9,747
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         247,421
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         257,168
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>             30,330
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                       0
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>      30,330
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>            15,246
<NET-INCOME>                        15,084
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>          2,307
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>       12,777
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>            10,600
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>           11,787
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>              34,829
<EPS-BASIC>                         5.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                         5.46


</TABLE>
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-18-00416-CV

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV-2018-03912

ORDER

We have considered Berry’s “Emergency Stay Pending Appeal/Mandamus.”

To the extent Berry is asking this court to reconsider its December 28, 2018

order, we deny the motion because the trial court has not yet set a supersedeas bond

amount. See Tex. Prop. Code Ann. § 24.007.

To the extent Berry seeks a writ of mandamus ordering the trial court to set a

bond amount, the trial court has continuing jurisdiction to set a bond amount even

after an appeal has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 24.3(a); In re Smitherman, 533 S.W.3d

ANDRE BERRY, Appellant

V.

BEN ZEN PROPERTIES LLC, Appellee

FILE COPY
907, 909 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2017, orig. proceeding) (“The county court

has a duty to set the amount of the supersedeas bond so that a party in an eviction

suit may file the bond within ten days of the signing of the judgment.” (emphasis

added)). But Berry (relator) has not complied with the rules of appellate procedure as

to the following:

1) the motion does not include a certificate of service showing that relator has

served the Respondent trial judge and the opposing party (real party in interest)

in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 9.5(b), nor does it show that he

has notified or made a diligent effort to notify those parties of his filing by

expedited means, such as telephone or fax; and

(2) the “Emergency Stay Pending Appeal/Mandamus” does not contain the

items listed in rule of appellate procedure 52.3 (identity of parties and counsel,

table of contents, index of authorities, statement of the case, statement of

jurisdiction, issues presented, statement of facts, argument, prayer, certification,

appendix).

We order Berry to submit the certificate of service no later than 3:00 p.m. on

January 4, 2019, and to submit a filing complying with rule 52.3 no later than 5:00

p.m. on January 7, 2019. Failure to comply with either of the above may result in

relief being denied.

The clerk of this court is directed to transmit a copy of this order to Berry, any

attorneys of record, the trial court judge, and the trial court clerk.

Dated January 3, 2019.

Per Curiam

2

FILE COPY
# kfCOJ<..D 

# o-f Coi'JTACrTs



# Y;AA-]OIO-1 lOb Transport Cmmda Anlhony Wall IOIlS/IO No ubjection 613-952-4410 I{egiollal Airline Connie Amold 

### 10118/10 Sent cmail -No objection Association AmoJd@raa.org Bombardier Alexandre St. Arnaud 10/18110 Left voice message -No Objection



### 514 855-5001 Ext 28482



# --------------------------------- ~-
EXHIBIT 99.1



                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Unitrend, Inc.  (The
Company)  on  Form  10-QSB  for  the period ending March 31, 2004, as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date
hereof  (the  Report),  I,  Conrad  A.H.  Jelinger, Chief  Executive
Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C. ss. 1350,  as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained  in  the  Report fairly presents,
in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the Company.

                                 /s/  Conrad A.H. Jelinger
                                 -----------------------------
                                 Conrad A.H. Jelinger
May 14, 2004
                                 Chief Executive Officer, Interim
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 President