alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Barbara Johnson

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 9:27:59 AM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Barbara Johnson

12531 S. Justine

Calumet Park, IL 60827
##### 



Exhibit 10.1
 SEPARATION AGREEMENT AND  FULL AND FINAL RELEASE OF CLAIMS
  1. SEVERANCE .
 2. CONSIDERATION .
  3. NO OBLIGATION .
 4. FULL AND FINAL RELEASE .




---



##### 



5. NO CLAIMS .
 6. CERTAIN STATEMENTS; REFERENCES .
 2




---



##### 



7. NON-ADMISSION OF LIABILITY OR WRONGFUL CONDUCT .
 8. COMPLETE TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP AND RETURN OF PROPERTY .
  9. CONFIDENTIALITY .
 10. GOVERNING LAW .
 11. SEVERABILITY .
 3




---



##### 



12. DISCLOSURE OF COMPANY INFORMATION .
 13. SOLE AND ENTIRE AGREEMENT . except
 14. NO OTHER PROMISES.
 15. INDEMNIFICATION .
  4




---



##### 



16. LEGALLY BINDING AGREEMENT .
 MR. KING SHOULD READ THIS AGREEMENT CAREFULLY. THIS AGREEMENT
INCLUDES A RELEASE OF ALL KNOWN AND UNKNOWN CLAIMS.
 Date: October 13, 2006
    
    /s/ Roy C. KingRoy C. KingFor: Gevity HR, Inc.Date: October 13, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Edwin E. Hightower, Jr.Edwin E. Hightower, Jr.Vice President and General Counsel
 5
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AND UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-1997
<CASH>                                       2,431,014
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,330
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    396,656
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,850,000
<PP&E>                                         164,140
<DEPRECIATION>                                  99,642
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,329,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,014,195
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,009
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,311,398
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,329,602
<SALES>                                        139,133
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               139,133
<CGS>                                          104,648
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  510,021
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,465
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (447,140)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (447,140)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 41,774
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (405,366)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
-----Original Message----- 

From: bmcgarry@nycap.rr.com [mailto:bmcgarry@nycap.rr.com] 

Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 7:12 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 

I am opposed to any and all consideration of the federal government 

tinkering with my 403(b) savings account. 

Our nation was founded on the concept of liberty and the pursuit of 

happiness. The concept of liberty includes the freedom to make 

choices. Sometimes those choices have positive outcomes. Other times 

they have negative outcomes. It is not the role of the government to 

determine equal OUTCOMES. The government's role is to protect the 

right to equality in OPPORTUNITY. 

I urge the Dept. of Labor and Dept. of the Treasury to abandon any plan 

to "guarantee" the OUTCOMES of my 403(b). 

Cordially, Brian McGarry
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 10.3


                                      1999

                        SENIOR MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN

For Fiscal 1999, incentive will be determined by Corporate Earnings per Share as
follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       BONUS AWARD AS A PERCENT
         EARNING PER SHARE                  OF BASE SALARY
         -----------------             ------------------------
<S>                                    <C>
           $ 1.22-1.25                            30
             1.26-1.33                            40
             1.34+                                50
</TABLE>

If unusual major factors significantly change Fiscal 1999 Earnings, decisions
regarding any adjustments will be made by the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors.

The Company's 1999 Senior Management Incentive Plan shall be governed by the
following rules:

A.   The incentive compensation for the 1999 fiscal year computed as provided
     for in the Plan, shall be divided into two (2) equal installments, one
     payable on the first day of February 2000, and the other on the first day
     of February 2001 (the "Payment Dates").

B.   A participant shall become entitled to the installment payable on each
     Payment Date, on that date, if and only if, he then continues to be in the
     employ of the company, or if not, that the termination of his employment by
     the Company was caused by death, complete disability, retirement after age
     sixty (60) or discharged by the Company without cause.

C.   Should any installment be payable to a Participant who is not entitled
     thereto on any Payment Date as provided for above, such installment shall
     not revert to the Company but shall be reallocated and paid to the other
     Participants proportionate to the amounts to which they are otherwise
     entitled to receive under the plan.

D.   All determinations arising under the Plan shall be determined by the
     Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, whose
     decision thereon shall be final, conclusive and binding.

E.   Employees participating in a commission override program will participate
     at the rate of one half of the amount of scheduled amount called for.

F.   Any senior management employees participating in any other division/local
     incentive plans, shall not participate in the foregoing plan.
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D2 023

- 2089 LT Case No. 2019

- CA

- 041690

_____________________________ D ONOVAN G. D AVIS , J R ., Appella nt,

v. C HRISTIAN R OMANDETTI , B RIDGETTE B ROMFIELD , D AMIEN B ROMFIELD , B ETH C OURTNEY , B LAYNE S. D AVIS , C ARISSA D OUGLAS , CK, LLC, C APITAL B LU M ANAGEMENT , LLC, F IRST C HOICE H EALTHCARE S OLUTIONS , I NC ., and T HE C RENSHAW S CHOOL , Appellees

.

_____________________________

On a ppeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County. Scott A. Blaue, Judge. Donovan G. Davis, Jr., Coleman, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee s.
J une 14, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.2 Donovan G. Davis, Jr., who was the plaintiff in the litigation below, appeals the trial court’s final order 1 entered after a case management conference that dismissed the action for lack of prosecution for the sole reason that Davis had “abandoned” his motions. At the time of the case management conference, Davis ha d two motions pending

— to have the case declared “complex” under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.201, and to disqualify counsel of one of the ten defendants that he sued in his operative amended complaint.
A trial court can dismiss an action for lack of prosecution unde r Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e) based on no record activity. This rule, however, provides a specific process that must be undertaken before the court can do so. The trial court did not travel under this rule in dismissing the c ase. W e are unaware of any separate rule, statute, or caselaw that authorizes a trial court to dismiss an action for lack of prosecution simply because a plaintiff may have chosen to abandon the type of motions filed here; nor did the trial court cite to any such authority in its final order. Accordingly , we reverse the order dismissing the case for lack of prosecution and remand for further proceedings.
R EVERSED and R EMANDED

. W ALLIS , L AMBERT , and H ARRIS , JJ., concur.

________ _____________________ Not fin al until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________

1 We note that the order effectively dismisses the case with prejudice as the causes of action asserted by Davis in his operative complaint would now be barred under the applicable statute of limitations if Davis attempted to file a separate action.
From: Cecile Blot

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 6:04:42 AM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Cecile Blot

416 Ridge St, NW

Washington, DC 20001
<PAGE>


                                                               EXHIBIT 22.1



               SUBSIDIARIES OF ZITEL CORPORATION



1.   Zitel International Corporation
     47211 Bayside Parkway
     Fremont, CA  94538-6517

2.   Zitel SARL
     47211 Bayside Parkway
     Fremont, CA  94538-6517

3.   Zitel Export Corporation
     47211 Bayside Parkway
     Fremont, CA  94538-6517

4.   Datametrics Systems Corporation
     47211 Bayside Parkway
     Fremont, CA  94538-6517

5.   Datametrics Systems Limited
     47211 Bayside Parkway
     Fremont, CA  94538-6517

6.   Datametrics Systems Nederland B.V.
     47211 Bayside Parkway
     Fremont, CA  94538-6517





                             Page 62
1210-AB32-2-1340.html[7/26/2015 1:50:00 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvy-fzbm

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1836

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

 To whom i t may concern:

If the US government or the current administration is considering any rules or laws to restrict the use of 401K or

 any private 

retirement savings I have invested in. My simple words are to keep your hands off my hard earned money and

 keep the 

current regulations unchanged. It is my opinion that if anything is considered and that the party whose idea is to

 change 

regulations to restrict use of private funds is none of their business. And if anyone should have any "smart ideas"

 about more

government intervention should forfeit their retirement and benefits to the public as and example of fool

 hardedness.. History 

shown that more government intervention whether slowly or quickly sends a society down the road to socialism

 and 

governments run by an individual or a handful that have a say and no one to rebuke. In other words a

 dictatorship.

Regards,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                             336
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,079
<ALLOWANCES>                                       498
<INVENTORY>                                      4,733
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,606
<PP&E>                                           9,539
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,786
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,552
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,455
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           19,943
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (13,846)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,552
<SALES>                                         31,081
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,081
<CGS>                                           23,098
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,188
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,619
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   117
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (80)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,812)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,512)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.58)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1


EXHIBIT 12

               AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                SCHEDULE SETTING FORTH THE COMPUTATION OF RATIOS
                    OF CONSOLIDATED EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                      (Amounts in thousands, except ratios)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                      YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,                       
                                                           -------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             1998            1997            1996             1995            1994 
                                                           --------        --------        --------         --------        --------
<S>                                                        <C>             <C>             <C>              <C>             <C>     
Earnings:

Income (loss) from continuing
 operations (including dividends
 from less-than-50%-owned
 affiliates) before income taxes,
 equity in earnings of affiliates
 and others, and minority interests ...............        $ 16,526        $ 10,290        $(10,539)        $  9,524        $  9,659

Fixed charges .....................................          12,410           9,396          14,286           13,169          17,149
                                                           --------        --------        --------         --------        --------

  Earnings ........................................        $ 28,936        $ 19,686        $  3,747         $ 22,693        $ 26,808
                                                           ========        ========        ========         ========        ========

Fixed Charges:

 Interest .........................................        $ 12,317        $  9,263        $ 14,081         $ 12,921        $ 16,234

 Amortization of debenture expenses ...............              93             133             205              248             915
                                                           --------        --------        --------         --------        --------

 Fixed charges ....................................        $ 12,410        $  9,396        $ 14,286         $ 13,169        $ 17,149
                                                           ========        ========        ========         ========        ========


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ................          2.33:1          2.10:1           .26:1           1.72:1          1.56:1
                                                           ========        ========        ========         ========        ========
</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Consolidated Guidance About Materials Licenses (NUREG-1556)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 24 , 20 12

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00 020

- CV

____________ GILBERT D. GILES , Appellant

V.

SHUNDA GILES , Appellee

On Appeal from the 247th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 19 97

- 47863



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
This is an attempted appe al from an order signed November 10, 2011

. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on January 9, 2012 , seeking to appeal the trial court’s dismissal order of November 10, 2011. On April 3, 2012, a clerk’s record was filed in this appeal, which did not contain a dismissal order signed November 10, 2011, or any other final appealable order. This court ordered the district clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the dismissal order. On April 24, 2012, the Harris County District Clerk filed a supplemental clerk’s record with the notation, “There is no signed dismissal order, d ated2

November 10, 2011 in this file. The only reference to this date was the Courts [sic] Docket Sheet, which is included in this Supplemental Record.” The docket sheet entry states, “Nov. 10, 2011 no signed order for new trial as granted 10/11/11.”

On April 27, 2012, this court informed all parties of the court’s intent to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless any party filed a response within ten days of the date
of the letter. Appellant filed no response.

T he appeal is ordered dismissed

.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Boyce, and McCally

.
Exhibit 32.1

         Certification of Chief Executive Officer of FirstBank NW Corp.
     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of FirstBank
NW Corp. ("the Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report"),
I, Clyde E. Conklin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     o    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     o    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the Company's financial condition and results of
          operations.





/s/ CLYDE E. CONKLIN
-----------------------
Chief Executive Officer

Dated: February 17, 2004


                                                                              30
Page | of 2

UBU/2L0 AUG 2 3 2010

} DIVISION
LEGAL PROCESSING TIO!
ATION & REGULA 9
PUBLICATION ANCH. f

J jc

=

\

?

[As of: August 20, 2010

PUBLIC Beste ug 0,201

SUBMISSION racking No. Sobscca6.
Comments Due: August 16, 2010!

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0291
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Ss

Submitter Information

Name: Jerry Wayne Barker
Address:
5018 Love Rd
El Paso, TX, 79922
Email: wbarker7@hotmail.com
Phone: 915-833-6889
SS SS

General Comment

8/9/10

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Stazus
as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=...__ 8/20/2010


Page 2 of 2

be weakened or reduced in any way. | specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

Jerry W. Barker

11212 Montwood Dr.
El Paso, TX 79922

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=..._ 8/20/2010