alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SCPW-13-0000313

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

TRAVELOCITY.COM LP, SITE59.COM LLC, EXPEDIA, INC., 

HOTWIRE, INC., HOTELS.COM, L.P., ORBITZ, LLC, 

INTERNETWORK PUBLISHING CORP., TRIP NETWORK, INC., 

PRICELINE.COM, INC., and TRAVELWEB LLC, Petitioners, 

vs.

GARY W.B. CHANG, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT

OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, Respondent,

and

DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION, STATE OF HAWAI#I, Real-Party in Interest.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(T.A. No. 11-1-0021)

ORDER DENYING MOTION

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the Petitioners’ April 19, 2013

submission in support of its March 28, 2013 Petition for a Writ

of Mandamus – which this court characterizes as a motion to amend

the March 28, 2013 Petition – the exhibits appended thereto, and

the record, it appears the Petitioners, in addition to

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-13-0000313

02-MAY-2013

02:59 PM
2

reiterating a previous request for this court to stay the

provisions of HRS § 235-114 (Supp. 2010), which this court

declined to do by way of its April 22, 2013 order denying the

original Petition, also request this court to “clarify or

confirm” whether the February 8, 2013 order of the Tax Appeal

Court and the April 1, 2013 denial of the Petitioner’s motion for

reconsideration of the February 8, 2013 order are final,

appealable orders. However, it is premature for this court to

opine on the appealability of the orders before an appeal is

brought, and this court declines to issue an advisory opinion. 

See Office of Hawaiian Affairs v. Housing and Cmty. Dev. Corp. Of

Hawai#i, 121 Hawai#i 324, 339 n. 13, 219 P. 3d 1111, 1126 n. 13

(2009) (advisory opinions are “impermissible”); State v. Lo, 116

Hawai#i 23, 25-26, 169 P.3d 975, 977-78 (2007) (“Thus, this court

must determine at the outset whether a mandamus petitioner may

have a remedy by way of appeal or any other means of relief from

the trial court’s action.”); Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204,

982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary

remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a

clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative

means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the

requested action; such writs are not intended to supercede the

legal discretionary authority of the lower courts, nor are they

intended to serve as legal remedies in lieu of normal appellate
3

procedures). Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioners’ April 19,

2013 motion is denied on its merits.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 2, 2013.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack
#### Julius Lessynsky, Appellant, v. Samuel H. Lessynsky, Respondent.

Order reversed and motion denied, on condition that a stipulation be given in accordance with the statements contained in the affidavits of Nathaniel Myers, one of the plaintiff’s attorneys, reducing the number of items in dispute, and confirming the issue to such items as are stated in his affidavit to be subjects of controversy; otherwise affirmed, without costs.
From: Janet Walsh

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 11:34:08 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Janet Walsh

3499 E. Bayshore Rd. #136

Redwood City, CA 94063
SUPREME COURT.

#### Nancy Barber and another agt. James H. Goodell and others.

*Proof of service—death of deputy sheriff—substituted proof.*

Where the summons and other papers were placed in the hands of a deputy sheriff, which he served, but died before making proof of service; on affidavits showing statements made by the deputy while he was sick, as to service, and the times and places, the sheriff was directed to make proof of service, under his certificate, in accordance with such affidavits.

*Oneida Special*Term,

April, 1877.

Motion to substitute proof of service. The summons and other papers were placed in the hands of a deputy sheriff for service on the defendants residing in his county, and he served them but died before making proof of service.

Affidavits were read on the motion showing statements made by the deputy sheriff, while he was sick and confined to his bed, as to service, and the times and places; of a defendant corroborating the statements so made, and others to the same effect.

*S. L. Seabrook,*for motion.

Hardin, J.

Ordered that the affidavits be filed and that the sheriff of the county, in which the service was made, make proof of service, under his certificate, according to the affidavits .read on the motion.
From: John Hanagan

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Thursday, August 04, 2011 12:28:38 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

John Hanagan
Indianapolis, Indiana
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.33 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Nancy Lee

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 10:30:40 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Nancy Lee

7660 Myrtle Ave #13

Eureka, CA 95503
MEMORANDUM

DATE: June 23, 2011

SUBJECT: Conversation with a Representative of Kitchen Cabinet Manufacturers 

Association (KCMA) Regarding Add-On Control Devices and High 

Formaldehyde Concentration in Coatings

FROM: Nicholas Swanson, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/NRG 

TO: Docket No.: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0786

A telephone call was made to KCMA’s executive vice president, Dick Titus. I initiated 

the conversation to inquire about the frequency of add-on control devices within the kitchen 

cabinet manufacturers’ section of the industry. Mr. Titus indicated that he did not have an exact 

number off the top of his head, but knew that there are 10 to 12 of them. Specifically, he 

mentioned that Masco Cabinetry had 3 regenerative thermal oxidizers (RTOs). I inquired about 

the feasibility for other facilities to incorporate RTOs and Mr. Titus indicated that he did not 

know of any additional facilities where it would be cost effective and that it should be evaluated 

on a facility by facility basis. 

I inquired about the number of facilities that are associated with KCMA that use lowformaldehyde coatings. Mr. Titus did not indicate his definition of “low-formaldehyde,” but did 

state that there are several smaller facilities that are using coatings with concentrations up to 4% 

of formaldehyde. He was not able to identify those facilities for me.
From: Carol Kling

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: You suck for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 11:36:29 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

Pregnancy is not a disease.

Having sex is a choice,

Having a baby is a blessing.

Birth control is a matter of taking control of your own

life and making decisions as to whether you should have

sex now or not.

Birth control pills do not need to be given away and poisoning our your women and I do not appreciate,

as a tax payer, having to pay for this health disaster.

And shame on you for claiming to be a Catholic.

Sincerely,

Carol Kling

420 Main Ave #1

Lemmon, sd 57638
H. Res. 396

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 25, 2002.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 3231) to replace the Immigration and Naturalization Service with the Agency for Immigration Affairs,

and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be

dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of

the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the

bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the

Committee on the Judiciary. After general debate the bill

shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute

rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for

the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the

amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the

Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be con-
2

•HRES 396 EH

sidered as read. All points of order against the committee

amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived. No

amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of a

substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report

of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution.

Each such amendment may be offered only in the order

printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided

and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not

be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the

Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such

amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of

the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have

been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in

the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of

the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the

nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final
3

•HRES 396 EH

passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### Sweat *&*Mattox *v.*Georgia Naval Stores Company.

Submitted March 28,

Decided November 16, 1907.

Motion to dismiss the writ of error.

*B.*(7. *Dickerson,*for plaintiffs in error.'

*Cranford & Wilcox,*contra.

Beck, J.

Where a bill of exceptions, in a ease in which an application for an injunction was granted, recites that it was presented “within thirty days from the passing of the order as aforesaid and. the trial of said case,” and it does not appear from either the record or the bill of exceptions that the latter was tendered within twenty days from the rendition of the decision, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the writ of error. Civil Code, §5540; *Evans*v. *State,*112 *Ga.*763.

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Molden, J., who did not preside.*
1

Hutson, Nick

From: Frey, Nathan J. <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>

Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 3:47 PM

To: Hutson, Nick; Culligan, Kevin; Owens, Nicole; Elman, Barry

Subject: Summary of Interagency Comments Under EO 12866 and 13563 - New, Modified and 

Reconstructed Power Plant NSPS RIA 

Attachments: SummaryofinteragencycommentsunderEO 12866_111(b) New-Mods 2060-AQ91 RIA Final_

20150520_bulleted.docx; SummaryofinteragencycommentsunderEO 12866_111(b) NewMods 2060-AQ91 RIA Final_20150520.docx

Attached please find summaries of interagency comments under EOs 12866 and 13563 on the RIA for the draft final rule, 

Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: 

Electric Utility Generating Units. 

Thank you and please let me know if you have any questions. 

Nathan
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - [RTID 0648-XD294]

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice; public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's Spiny Dogfish Advisory Panel will hold a public meeting. See                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                         for agenda details.                    

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Wednesday, September 20, 2023, from 5 p.m. until 7:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be held via webinar. Connection information will be posted to the MAFMC's website calendar prior to the meeting at                         *www.mafmc.org.*

*Council address:*                         Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331;                         *www.mafmc.org.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 526-5255.

      ( print page 60184)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose of the meeting is for the Advisory Panel to create a Fishery Performance Report that includes advisor input on recent spiny dogfish catch, specifications, and related management measures.

## Special Accommodations

The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should be directed to Shelley Spedden, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

*Authority:*16 U.S.C. 1801*et seq.*

Dated: August 28, 2023.

Rey Israel Marquez,

Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2023-18857 Filed 8-30-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
Order entered August 7, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00210-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.A.E. AND J.O.E., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 469th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 469-53528-2014

ORDER

Before the Court is the July 26, 2018 second motion of Jeremy J. Poet to withdraw as 

counsel for appellee, Michael C. Enge. We GRANT the motion. We DIRECT the Clerk of this 

Court to remove Mr. Poet as counsel for appellee. Appellee is now appearing before the Court 

pro se. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order and all future 

correspondence to appellee at:

353 Frosty Hollow Rd.

Denison, Texas 75021

(903) 271-4948

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
#### Timothy O’Herlihy, Respondent, *v.*Adrian H. Joline et al., as Receivers of the New York City Railway Company, Appellants.

(Submited May 6, 1912;

decided May 14, 1912.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See. 205 N. Y. 548.)
Exhibit 32SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONEach of the undersigned, S.W. Yong, President and Chief Executive Officer of Trio-TechInternational, a California corporation (the “Company”), and Victor H.M. Ting, Vice President andChief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of hisknowledge (1) the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2005, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     /s/  S. W. YONG     Name:   S. W. Yong  Title:     President and Chief Executive Officer  Date:     September 27, 2005     /s/  VICTOR H. M. TING     Name:   Victor H.M. Ting  Title:     Vice President and                Chief Financial Officer  Date:     September 27, 2005A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register: May 3, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 84)]
[Notices]               
[Page 23247]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr03my10-60]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: Wednesday, May 5, 2010; 2 p.m.-4 p.m.

Place: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

Status: Closed to the Public.

Matters to be Considered: Compliance Status Report
    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

Contact Person for More Information: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: April 27, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-10377 Filed 4-29-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```