alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Face of Defense: Soldier Counts on Training, Teammates
 By Sgt. Ginifer Spada , American Forces Press Service
  
 NANGARHAR PROVINCE, Afghanistan (June 13, 2011) – May 13 was just another day – another mounted patrol in the mountainous area outside of Combat Outpost Honaker-Miracle, Afghanistan, Army Spc. Brian Walker said. “We get shot at all the time, every day,” said Walker, an infantry radio operator assigned to Company C, 2nd Battalion, 35th Infantry Regiment, Task Force Cacti, 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 25th Infantry Division, Task Force Bronco. “We are bringing them the fight.”But for Walker, a Johnson City, Tenn., native, this wasn’t just another day. He was riding in the lead vehicle of a mounted patrol when it hit a roadside bomb.“I don’t remember much from that day,” Walker said recently while recovering in a hospital at Bagram Airfield. The parts he does remember, however, speak volumes about his team and their training.“Everyone was doing exactly the right thing,” Walker recalled. “Everyone fell back on their training and did exactly what they were supposed to do.”Army Staff Sgt. Simon Bachmann, Walker’s squad leader, echoed Walker’s sentiments.“As soon as everything popped off, everyone did the right thing,” he said. “The driver got them through the kill zone, [and] everyone in the truck began buddy aid. They all responded to a ‘T.’ They reacted perfectly.”The truck commander, gunner and two other soldiers all suffered shrapnel injuries. While Walker’s injuries were minor, he lost consciousness multiple times, and was sent to the traumatic brain injury clinic.Although Walker is not fully recovered, he said, he is doing much better than when he arrived at the clinic. Bachmann said he isn’t surprised at Walker’s progress.“He’s a good guy – really friendly, and motivated,” Bachmann said. “He likes to work and get stuff done.”Walker received a Purple Heart Medal, presented to him by Army Maj. Gen. Dan Allyn, Regional Command East and Combined Joint Task Force 1 commander, and the command’s senior enlisted advisor, Army Command Sgt. Maj. Saia Vimoto.“I was honored – I mean, the command sergeant major and commander of the biggest base in Afghanistan,” Walker said. “I was just honored.”Walker said the pace at Bagram Airfield’s traumatic brain injury clinic is in stark contrast to that of Combat Outpost Honaker-Miracle.“This is the first time a whole week has gone by without me getting shot at,” he said.Although the more relaxed battle rhythm at the clinic is helping Walker recover, he is anxious to get back to his fellow soldiers and to do his job.“I know that they need me,” he said. “I want to get back and do my job – get back and be there for the guys.”Walker and Bachmann agreed that everyone in their platoon shares the same dedication to each other and their jobs here. The 2nd Platoon Renegades, as Walker and the other soldiers from his platoon are known, are at the beginning of a year-long deployment to one of the most dangerous areas of eastern Afghanistan.
2014-12-10 11:11 DOT 1» 2024935142 p 15/15 

28 April 20 14 

FDMS No. FAA 2013 - 1083 

From: Joe Barbera, Respondent 

To: David Shane, Complainants Counsel 

To: The Honorable Richard Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

To: Pat Matthews, Staff Assistant, via email only 

Response to Complainant'$ MQtion To De~m Allegations Admitted and to 

Dismiss Appeal, dated 18tn April, submitted by David Shane. 

My apologies in advance if this is not the standard format as address such 

communications. 

I would like to make it clear that I had no intentions of letting this matter rest or admit 

guilt by non-response. 

My interpretation of Procedural Order served 25 March required a response within 30 

days, and that my response dated 19 April was in line with that. If I have error'd in 

that, I apologize. 

My intention is to continue with the discovery phase and preparation for my defense . 

• Joe Barbera 

Emailed on 28 April, hard copy to follow on 29 April 

-a ..
#### Hiram E. Wanamaker, Respondent, v. Frank Ehoner, Appellant.

Judgment and order denying new trial reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by Dykman, J.; Pratt, J., dissenting.
#### Grove F. Strong, Appellant, v. William G. Broad, Respondent.

Judgment, of the County Court of Onondaga county affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Follett, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 465 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 27, 2002.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order (except those arising under section 
302(f) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974) to consider in the House the 
bill (H.R. 4954) to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for 
a voluntary program for prescription drug coverage under the Medicare Program, 
to modernize and reform payments and the regulatory structure of the Medicare 
Program, and for other purposes. The bill shall be considered as read for 
amendment. In lieu of the amendment recommended by the Committee on Ways and 
Means, the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the report of the 
Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted. 
All points of order against the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final 
passage without intervening motion except: (1) two hours of debate on the bill, 
as amended, with one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means and one hour equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10QSB
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         338,637
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  329,216
<ALLOWANCES>                                    39,698
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               989,517
<PP&E>                                       8,293,086
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,797,410
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,485,193
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,763,088
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        47,031
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,825,119)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,485,193
<SALES>                                        501,235
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               517,532
<CGS>                                          296,633
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  448,688
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (3,571)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             269,990
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (197,575)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (197,575)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (197,575)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    10000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 10000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   10000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                        9900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     10000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.4







Rotterdam, 5 March 2010Re:
            Consent
      FinLog B.V.




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM




We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Forms
S-8 (File No. 333-61895 and File No. 333-55970) and Forms S-3 (File No.
333-140968, File No. 333-140969 and File No. 333-140974) of our report dated
February 20, 2009 relating to the financial statements for consolidation
purposes of FinLog B.V., which appears in this Form 10-K of Ampal – American
Israel Corporation.




Yours
faithfully,





MAZARS PAARDEKOOPER HOFFMAN ACCOUNTANTS N.V.





O.
Opzitter RA
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
        This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of earnings and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          10,981
<SECURITIES>                                    12,766
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,047
<ALLOWANCES>                                       728
<INVENTORY>                                     11,656
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,010
<PP&E>                                          21,865
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,691
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,799
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,377
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,077
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,331
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,799
<SALES>                                         87,220
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                87,220
<CGS>                                           45,395
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   78,017
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   302
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,038
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,161
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,877
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,877
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24
        

</TABLE>
----

----

I Teave

Komisjon

----

Euro vahetuskurss (1)

31. mai 2004

(2004/C 143/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Allikas: EKP avaldatud viitekurss.

----

----

Eelteatis koondumise kohta

(Toimik nr COMP/M.3431 — Sonoco/Ahlstrom/JV)

(2004/C 143/02)

(EMPs kohaldatav tekst)

----

(1)EÜT L 395, 30.12.1989, lk 1; parandus EÜT L 257, 21.9.1990, lk 13.

(2)EÜT L 180, 9.7.1997, lk 1; parandus EÜT L 40, 13.2.1998, lk 17.

----

----

Eelteatis koondumise kohta

(Toimik nr COMP/M.3423 — RWA/AMI/Inter-Fert (JV))

(2004/C 143/03)

(EMPs kohaldatav tekst)

----

(1)  ELT L 24, 29.1.2004, lk 1.

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 3, 2018

No. 04-18-00509-CV

TITLE SOURCE, INC.,

Appellant

v.

HOUSECANARY INC., formerly known as Canary Analytics, Inc.,

Appellees

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-CI-06300

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The clerk’s notification of late record is hereby GRANTED. Time is extended to August 

13, 2018.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of August, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
---------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of 1 

p\7~Li~X~OCONESSING DIVISION 

&: REGULATIONS BRANCH As of: August 20, 2010 

Received: August 09, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 20, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2c69f 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, ~!010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-001O 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathel"ed 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Statu:s as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-201O-0010-0227 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: V.Gwytha Telotta 

Address: 

26 Marie Drive 

Gretna, 70053-5725 

Email: gwytha7@att.net 

Phone: 504-367-2297 

Submitter's Representative: Sen. David Vitter, Rep. Steve Scalise 

General Comment 

I support the adoption of regulations that would restrict the use the "Ioophole"of the Patient 

Protection & Affordable Care Act that would allow some insurance plans to "escape" having t<:> 

provide new consumer-friendly protections because they have been granted "grandfathered" 

status. 

https:llfdrns.erulernaking.netlfdrns-web-agency Icornponentlsubrnitter InfoCover Page?Call=... 8/20/20 I 0
Opinion issued April 27, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-22-00925-CV

———————————

EVERGREEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, L.L.C., Appellant

V.

EVOQUA WATER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 164th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2022-48769

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On December 13, 2022, appellant, Evergreen Environmental Services, L.L.C., 

filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order granting the Motion to Dismiss 

for Improper Venue and Motion to Enforce Forum Selection Clause of appellee, 

Evoqua Water Technologies, LLC. On April 17, 2023, the parties filed a “Joint 
2

Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” In the motion, the parties represented that they had

“entered a settlement agreement which fully resolved all their disputes in th[e] matter 

rendering further proceedings unnecessary.” The parties requested that the Court 

“grant [their] [m]otion and dismiss the appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2). The 

motion further stated that “[e]ach party ha[d] agreed to bear its own costs of this 

appeal.” 

No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion has issued. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2), (c).

Accordingly, we grant the parties’ motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2), 43.2. We direct the Clerk of this Court that costs are to be 

taxed against the party incurring the same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1. We dismiss all 

other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Landau, Countiss, and Guerra.
version=parseInt(navigator.appVersion);	if (navigator.appVersion.indexOf('6.')>-1)	{	version=6	}	browser='OTHER';	if (navigator.appName=='Netscape')	{	browser='NS'+version;	}		if (navigator.appName=='Microsoft Internet Explorer')	{	browser='MSIE'+version;	}		if (navigator.appVersion.indexOf('MSIE 3')>0)	{	browser='MSIE3';	}		if (browser=='MSIE3')	{	window.location='http://www.cr.nps.gov/archeology/viewing.htm'	}		if (browser=='NS3')	{	window.location='http://www.cr.nps.gov/archeology/viewing.htm'	}		if (browser=='NS4')	{	window.location='http://www.cr.nps.gov/archeology/viewing.htm'	}
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 160 (Monday, August 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 56813]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-17903]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas and Oil Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: PR23-63-002.
    Applicants: Black Hills/Kansas Gas Utility Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  284.123 Rate Filing: BHKG Amended SOC Filing to 
be effective 8/1/2023.
    Filed Date: 8/15/23.
    Accession Number: 20230815-5000.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/28/23.

    Docket Numbers: RP23-937-001.
    Applicants: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: REX 2023-08-15 RP23-937 Amendment to 
be effective 8/1/2023.
    Filed Date: 8/15/23.
    Accession Number: 20230815-5085.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/28/23.

    Any person desiring to protest in any the above proceedings must 
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18 
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified 
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports 
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission 
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, 
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access 
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For 
public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as 
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is 
encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9ad5cacadafcffe8f9b4fdf5ec"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="89c6d9d9c9efecfbeaa7eee6ff">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: August 15, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-17903 Filed 8-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# 99054. $113M Booster Shot Raises Recruit Bonuses, Incentives

```

By Staff Sgt. Alicia K. Borlik, USA
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON -- Congress gave the Defense Department an additional 
$113 million in October to boost 1999 recruiting and retention 
efforts.

"The U.S. armed forces are facing a very challenging recruiting 
time, perhaps the most challenging since the inception of the 
all-volunteer force in 1973," said Air Force Col. James R. 
Holaday, deputy director for accession policy in the Office of 
the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Force Management Policy. 
The Navy and Army last year missed their recruiting goals, the 
Navy by 6,900 recruits and the Army, 800, he noted. 

Holaday said the additional funds will help the services deal 
with today's unusual recruiting market. The services, he said, 
need to be able to keep pace with the booming economy, which is 
driving more youth to college and civilian jobs instead of the 
military. 

He said about $54 million will go toward advertising, $42 
million will boost the services' enlistment bonus programs, and 
$17 million will supplement recruiter support activities. The 
Navy will receive the largest share, especially in advertising, 
to increase its chances for success, he said.

Advertising is how the services reach the target market of 18- 
to 24-year-old high-school graduates and send the message that 
they have opportunities available, Holaday said. Each service 
works with its own advertising agency to attract recruits with a 
unique message, he added.

Because the No. 1 reason young people enlist is for education -- 
to learn a skill and earn money for college -- the military is 
taking steps to enhance those opportunities, Holaday said. 
Recruits may qualify for up to $50,000 in education incentives. 
These include Montgomery GI Bill benefits and what the services 
call "kickers," a special bonus used to recruit for tough-to-
fill positions.

Recruits may also qualify for cash enlistment bonuses, also used 
for hard-to-fill jobs. The Army and Navy offer up to DoD's 
maximum of $12,000 per bonus. The Air Force tops out at $9,000 
and Marine Corps, $5,000. 

The $42 million marked for bonuses will raise the number 
available, not DoD's $12,000 ceiling, Holaday said. The Navy and 
the Army are getting more money for bonuses because they have 
the greatest need, he added. 

The Congress-approved $113 million was included in its readiness 
supplemental to the 1999 Defense Authorization Act, and it is in 
addition to the $2.3 billion the services budgeted for enlisted 
recruitment advertising, recruiter salaries and benefits, 
educational incentives and enlistment bonuses.

For more information on opportunities in the military, visit the 
services' recruiting Web sites at: www.navyjobs.com, 
www.goarmy.com, www.airforce.com and www.Marines.com.

##END##
```