alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                         UNITED BANCORP, INC. FORM 10-K


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No.
333-01081) for United Bancorp, Inc., the 1995 Dividend Reinvestment Plan, of our
report dated January 14, 2000 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
United Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1999.


                                         Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP


Columbus, Ohio
March 26, 2000









                                       17
From: Stefanie Wickstrom

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 4:40:24 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Stefanie Wickstrom

371 Indian Lake Dr

Ellensburg, WA 98926
#### In the Matter of Alexander G. Mercer.

— Decree affirmed, with costs.
|     |                                                                                                                       |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|     |                                                                                                                                                      |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
| Dated: | January 3, 2012 | By: | /s/ Robert S. Lieberman |   |
|   |   |   | Robert S. Lieberman |   |
|   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 473 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 11, 2002.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2486) to authorize the National Weather Service to conduct research 
and development, training, and outreach activities relating to tropical cyclone 
inland forecasting improvement, and for other purposes. The first reading of the 
bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and 
shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Science. After general debate the 
bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be 
in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the 
five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the 
Committee on Science now printed in the bill. Each section of the committee 
amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. During 
consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the 
Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member 
offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of the 
Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. 
Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 
bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may 
demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of 
the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a 
substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 
amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion 
to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 422 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          May 15, 2002.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill 
(H.R. 4737) to reauthorize and improve the program of block grants to States for 
temporary assistance for needy families, improve access to quality child care, 
and for other purposes. The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on any 
amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) two 
hours of debate on the bill, with 50 minutes equally divided and controlled by 
the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means, 40 
minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Education and the Workforce, and 30 minutes equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce; (2) an amendment in the nature of a substitute 
printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if 
offered by Representative Cardin of Maryland or his designee, which shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order, shall be considered as read, 
and shall be separately debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by 
the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Page | of |
2 WN Rec isiia/e
oc VISION
AL PROCESSING DI
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS
BRANCH As of: September 03, 2010

PUBLIC “ 3% Status: Posted

Posted: September 03, 2010
SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0664
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Unda P Submitter Information

General Comment

Forget about grandfathering the insurance industry

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 9/3/2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          36,311
<SECURITIES>                                 1,058,125
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,566
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,530,208
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          416,803
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        54,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,530,208
<SALES>                                        128,252
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               301,193
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  692,362
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (391,169)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (391,169)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (391,169)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
        

</TABLE>
#### MARIAM CAMPBELL, Respondent, *v.*DENIS HUBBARD and PEARL LEWIS, Administrators, etc., of SYBIL CHITTENDEN, Deceased, Appellants.

*Evidence*— *when inadmissible as calling for a personal communication with a deceased person*— *Code of Civil Procedure, see.*829.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the report of referee upon a statutory reference.

The plaintiff alleged that she rendered services to Sybil Chittenden for a period of about six years, and up to the time of her decease, in nursing and caring for her in her illness.

The court at General Term after considering other questions said: *“*The plaintiff, however, was permitted notwithstanding the objections of the defendants to testify as *to*the condition and action of the intestate after she was taken sick; and who was with her during her sickness other than the plaintiff; the plaintiff’s counsel claiming that it was competent for the plaintiff to testify to what she saw and observed of the intestate, and of the presence or absence of others.

“ Within the case of *Holcomb*v. *Holcomb*(95 N. Y., 825) we think this was error. The plaintiff sought to recover as upon a *quantum meruit*for services rendered to an invalid. The invalid condition was needful to be shown, as showing the occasion for the services. Its duration and continuousness were material as showing the amount of time given to the service. Its severity was material as showing the care and attention required and thus the value of the services. The presence or absence of others was material as showing the exclusive dependence of the invalid upon the plaintiff, and^ thus the amount of service and the length in time thereof. Connected with other evidence the importance of all this testimony is very manifest. The referee was thus aided by the testimony of the *307plaintiff to determine the extent and nature and value of the personal transactions between the plaintiff and deceased. Her claim rested upon her personal transactions with the deceased, and her evidence tended to prove them. Section 829 of the Code of Civil Procedure inhibits the testimony.

“ The judgment should be reversed, the referee discharged, a new trial granted, costs to abide the event.”

*Wm. Lounsbery,*for the appellants.

*Griswold ds*Crowell, for the respondent.

Opinion by

Landon, J.;

Learned, P. J.,

concurred.

Present — Learned, P. J., and Landon, J.

Judgment reversed, new trial granted, referee discharged, costs to abide event.
#### Martin *v.*Hunter.

Submitted May 28,

Decided August 14, 1907.

Injunction. Before Judge Parker. Ware superior court. February 6, 1907.

*Wilson, Bennett & Lambdin*and *Walter T. Dickerson,*for plaintiff in error. *S. O. Townsend,*contra.

Lumpkin, J.

There was no abuse of discretion in granting an injunction in this case.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Afghan civilians, government join forces to defeat and remove Taliban
 By None  , IJC Public Affairs Office
  KABUL, Afghanistan (April 27, 2010) - Gizab district, locked centrally in  the Hazarajet region of Afghanistan,  recently was the scene of community resolve and determination when  citizens took action to remove a Taliban threat from their village.  The Government of the  Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, with minimal involvement by  coalition forces, is assisting Gizab residents in their effort to  purge the Taliban from the area.With harassment by the  Taliban increasing, local villagers held a shura and decided to  establish a road block Wednesday in an effort to detain insurgents.  This action led to the apprehension of several insurgents as well as  their weapons and motorbikes.  A Taliban commander, responsible for  coordinating attacks against coalition special forces in the area,  was among those apprehended at the road block.Later that  afternoon, Taliban insurgents armed with small arms and  rocket-propelled grenades were preparing to attack the village. Local  citizens, defending their homes and families, engaged the insurgents  in a battle that lasted more than three days.A combined  patrol of Afghanistan National  Security Force and International  Security Assistance Force partners was conducting an  operation nearby and responded, enhancing security at the village  stronghold.After three days of fighting, the insurgents were  defeated and driven out of Gizab.  Between the villagers and  combined patrol, several insurgents were killed and four were  arrested.In the subsequent days, hostile action in the area  has diminished, providing an opportunity for the governor of Dai  Kundi, the provincial governor of neighbouring Uruzgan province, the  local Malik, and 20 other community leaders to travel to Gizab  district for a meeting to announce their support for the Afghan government and elect a  district chief of police.The combined force also attended the meeting Saturday to demonstrate  their support for the people of Gizab and the Afghan government.  The combined force  was warmly received by the villagers and leaders who said they were  grateful for government support.During the meeting, the deputy  governor placed a phone call to President  Hamid Karzai, who spoke to local elders and leaders and voiced his  pleasure with the cooperation between the different elements, which ultimately  removed 50 active Taliban fighters from the region."The  villagers' decision to react was fueled by Taliban members routinely  exerting their influence and control over the people in the southern  district of Gizab," said Capt. Rebecca Lykins, a Combined Joint Special  Operations Task Force-Afghanistan spokeswoman.  "Their reaction is a  testament to their confidence in (the government's) ability to protect and serve the  populace."
1210-AB32-2-1522.html[7/26/2015 6:52:14 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwn-hxlf

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2019

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Sandra Kascewicz

General Comment

Dear Department of Labor and President Obama,

I do not need government restrictions on how to use my own money for my retirement. I am smart enough to

 plan for my own retirement, thank you very much!
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                            CT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                            NAME                              STATE OF INCORPORATION
                            ----                              ----------------------
<S>                                                           <C>
The Concord Telephone Company                                     North Carolina
CTC Long Distance Services, Inc.                                  North Carolina
CT Cellular, Inc.                                                 North Carolina
Carolina Personal Communications, Inc                             North Carolina
CT Wireless Cable, Inc.                                           North Carolina
CTC Exchange Services, Inc.                                       North Carolina
CT Global Telecommunications, Inc.                                      Delaware
CTC Internet, Inc.                                                North Carolina
CT Communications Northeast Trust                                  Massachusetts
CT Communications Northeast, Inc.                                  Massachusetts
CT Communications Northeast Wireless Trust                         Massachusetts
</TABLE>
#### David H. Van Gelder v. James H. Van Gelder. David H. Van Gelder and Jacob Van Gelder v. James H. Van Gelder.

Order reversed as to Jacob Van Gelder, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements, and motion denied as to him, with ten dollars costs. Opinion by Landon, J.; to be settled by Landon J.; Bockes, J., not acting.
H. Res. 297

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 29, 2001.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3210) to ensure the

continued financial capacity of insurers to provide coverage

for risks from terrorism. The bill shall be considered as read

for amendment. In lieu of the amendments recommended by

the Committee on Financial Services and the Committee on

Ways and Means now printed in the bill, an amendment in

the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of H.R. 3357

shall be considered as adopted. The previous question shall

be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any

further amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, as

amended, equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial

Services; (2) the further amendment printed in the report of

the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if offered by Representative LaFalce of New York or his des-
2

•HRES 297 EH

ignee, which shall be in order without intervention of any

point of order, shall be considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled

by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
https://fdms.erulemaking.net/.../component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=Print&PrintId=0900006480b167c9&Comment=true[8/18/2010 3:03:37 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: August 18, 2010

Received: July 10, 2010

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 80b167c9

Comments Due: August 27, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: HHS-OS-2010-0014

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Preexisting Condition Exclusions, Lifetime and Annual Limits,

Rescissions, and PatientProtections

Comment On: HHS-OS-2010-0014-0001

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Preexisting Condition Exclusions, Lifetime and Annual Limits,

Rescissions, and PatientProtections

Document: HHS-OS-2010-0014-DRAFT-0008

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-15278

Submitter Information

Name: Ann Costello

General Comment

I don't think the present legislation goes far enough to guarantee all Americans basic health care. We still are

paying too much for a basic human right, and those who cannot afford care are suffering because of money. It's

all about the money. We have become a heartless and barbaric culture that thinks nothing of bail outs and

subsidies to oil (45 billion a year) and funding wars in countries where we pay mercenaries and buy the loyalty of

politicians while our own people can't afford simple tests! It is beyond appalling, so anything that can be done in

this sold out political climate is all we can hope for. good luck. I shallavoid the "health" care system like a plague

and, hopefully, die a death with dignity outside of its corrupt and dehumanizing walls. Ii'd like to leave my child

something when I die, and those who need their Bahama trips, yachts and offshore bank accounts can go

without my paltry contributions. Health care in America is a JOKE, and most of us can't afford to laugh!!
#### John Collins, Appellant, v. Sarah J. Collins, Respondent.

Order modified as directed in opinion, and affirmed as modified, without costs of appeal to either party. Opinion by Davis, P, J.