T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J E S US J AC QU E L I NE ME L GA R RODRI GU EZ , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 72937 A ge nc yN o. A 076- 268- 221 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A pr i l5, 2011 ** B efo re: B . F L E T C H E R , C L IF T O N , an dB E A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Je sus J ac qu el i ne M el gar R od ri gu ez , a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f G uat em al a, pet i t i on s f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng her app ea l fr om an i m m i grat i on j ud ge’ s dec i si on denyi ng her appl i cat i on for a sy l um and w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 

# FI LED APR12 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 72937 2 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o q u e s tio n s o f law , C er ez o v. Mukasey , 512 F . 3d 1 1 6 3 , 1 1 6 6 (9 th C ir. 2 0 0 8 ), ex ce p t t o th e e x ten t th at d ef er en ce is o w ed to th e B IA ’s d e te rm in a tio n o f

th e g o v e rn in g s ta tu te s a n dr e g u la tio n s , S im e o n o vv . A s h c r o ft , 371 F .3 d5 3 2 , 5 3 5 (9 th C ir. 2 0 0 4 ). W e r ev iew fo r s ub stan ti al ev id en ce th e a g en cy ’s factu al fi n d i n g s. Sa ntos-L em us v. Mukasey , 5 4 2 F .3 d7 3 8 , 7 4 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) . W e gr antthe pe t i t i on f

orr e vi e w a nd r e m and. S ub st ant i alevi dence s up po rt s the B IA ’ s f i nd i ng thatM el gar R od ri gu ez fa i l ed t o est abl i sh thatshe w ou l d b e per se cut ed by gang s on the basi s of e i ther her a c tua l ori m put e d pol i t i c a l opi ni on. Se e Santos -L e m us , 542 F . 3d a t747 ( oppos i t i on t o g ang act i vi ty does notconst i tut e apo l i t i ca l op i ni on ); R am os-L op ezv. H older , 56 3 F . 3d 85 5, 86 2 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). W e r ec ent l y hel d thatthe B IA coul d n otre j ec t“ al l w om en i n G uat em al a” as a part i cul arsoci algrou p sol el y bec ause i tw as ov er l y broad and i nt ernal l y di vers e. P erdo m o v. H

older , 61 1 F . 3d 66 2, 66 9 (9th C i r. 20 10 ) ( re m andi ng for f urther pr oc e e di ngs ) . H e r e , the B I A s i m i l ar l yr e j e c t e d M e l garR odr i gue z ’ s s oc i a l gr oup c ons i s t i ng of

w om e n i n G ua t e m a l aa s ove r l ybr oa d a nd l a c ki ng ac om m on, i m m ut abl e c har a c t e r i s t i c . I n l i ghtof ouri nt e rve ni ng de c i s i on i n P e rdo mo , we gr antM e l garR odr i gue z ’ s pe t i t i on f orr e vi e w w i th r e s pe c tt o he ra s y l um a nd09- 72937 3 w ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l c la im s a n dr e m an df o rf u rth e rp r o c e e d in g s c o n s is te n t w ith th is d is p o s itio n . See IN S v. V en tu ra , 53 7 U . S . 12 , 16 -18 (20 02 ) ( per c uri am ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W GR AN T E D; RE MAND E D.