alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1137 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1137

   To direct the Secretary of the Army to convey the remaining water 
    supply storage allocation in Rathbun Lake, Iowa, to the Rathbun 
                      Regional Water Association.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 28, 2001

  Mr. Harkin (for himself and Mr. Grassley) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the Secretary of the Army to convey the remaining water 
    supply storage allocation in Rathbun Lake, Iowa, to the Rathbun 
                      Regional Water Association.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RATHBUN LAKE, IOWA.

    (a) Conveyance.--The Secretary of the Army shall convey the 
remaining water supply storage allocation in Rathbun Lake, Iowa, to the 
Rathbun Regional Water Association (in this section referred to as the 
``Water Association'').
    (b) Construction of Visitors Center Complex.--Notwithstanding the 
Water Supply Act of 1958 (43 U.S.C. 390b), the Water Association shall 
pay for the water supply storage allocation to be conveyed under 
subsection (a) by constructing a regional lighthouse visitors center 
complex on Federal lands at Rathbun Lake.
    (c) Terms and Conditions.--Before conveying the water supply 
storage allocation under subsection (a), the Secretary shall enter into 
an agreement with the Water Association under which the Water 
Association shall agree to--
            (1) in accordance with designs approved by the Chief of 
        Engineers, construct a visitors center complex that has value 
        equal to or greater than the amount that otherwise would be 
        paid to the Federal Government for the costs of the water 
        supply storage under the Water Supply Act of 1958 (43 U.S.C. 
        390b);
            (2) be responsible for operating and maintaining the 
        visitors center complex;
            (3) pay all operation and maintenance costs allocated to 
        the water supply storage space;
            (4) use any revenues generated at the visitors center 
        complex that are above those required to operate and maintain 
        or improve the complex to undertake, subject to the approval of 
        the Chief of Engineers, activities that will improve the 
        quality of the environment in the Rathbun Lake watershed area; 
        and
            (5) such other terms and conditions as the Secretary 
        considers necessary to protect the interests of the United 
        States.
                                 <all>
```
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (5.85 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
IV

House Calendar No. 205

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 506

[Report No. 107–618]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 333) to amend title 11, United States Code, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 26 (legislative day, JULY 25), 2002

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 333) to amend title 11, United

States Code, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 333) to amend title 11, United

4 States Code, and for other purposes. All points of order

5 against the conference report and against its consideration

6 are waived. The conference report shall be considered as

7 read.
House Calendar No. 205

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 506

[Report No. 107–618]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 333) to amend

title 11, United States Code, and for other purposes.

JULY 26 (legislative day, JULY 25), 2002

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             256
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,189
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (695)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                             267
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (220)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,797
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              756
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           587
<OTHER-SE>                                         454
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,797
<SALES>                                            813
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   813
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      168
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   646
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   215
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (225)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         5
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (230)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)
        

</TABLE>
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.56 MB)
 
 JRTC FORSCOM SFAB
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 97-4792 HENRY GRANTHAM, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CR-97-6) Submitted: June 9, 1998 Decided: August 5, 1998 Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSELChristopher D. Janelle, HENRY, TAYLOR & JANELLE, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. William D. Wilmoth, United States Attorney, Zelda E. Wesley, Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM: Henry Grantham pled guilty to one count of distributing crackcocaine. Grantham's only contention in this appeal is that the sentencing court erred by refusing to reduce his offense level based on acceptance of responsibility b ecause of his continued drug use while on pretrial release. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual§ 3E1.1(a) (1995). It is undisputed that Grantham, after he had entered into a plea agreement and while on pretrial release, submitted two positive urine screens for cocaine during a period of approximately two months. We find that the district court properly denied a reduction for acceptance of responsibility under USSG § 3E1.1 based on Grantham's continued drug use following his arrest and prior to sentencing. See United States v. Underwood , 970 F.2d 1336, 1338-39 (4th Cir. 1992) (holding that continued use of marijuana after entering into plea agreement was proper grounds to deny acceptance of res ponsibility). Moreover, Grantham cites no authority for his position that his continued drug use should be excused b ecause of his addiction to drugs, and we find such position lacking in merit. Thus, we find that the district court did not clearly err, see United States v. Curtis , 934 F.2d 553, 557 (4th Cir. 1991), by finding that Grantham was not entitled to a reduction in his offense level for acceptance of res ponsibility based on his continued drug use following his arrest and prior to sentencing. Accordingly, the order of the district court is affirmed.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1140

To amend chapter 1 of title 9, United States Code, to provide for greater

fairness in the arbitration process relating to motor vehicle franchise

contracts.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 29, 2001

Mr. HATCH (for himself, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. LEAHY, Mr.

WARNER, Mr. BREAUX, Mr. BURNS, Mr. REID, Mr. CRAIG, Mr.

TORRICELLI, Mr. BENNETT, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. DEWINE, Mr. THOMAS,

and Mr. HUTCHINSON) introduced the following bill; which was read

twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend chapter 1 of title 9, United States Code, to provide

for greater fairness in the arbitration process relating

to motor vehicle franchise contracts.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Motor Vehicle Fran5 chise Contract Arbitration Fairness Act of 2001’’.
2

•S 1140 IS

1 SEC. 2. ELECTION OF ARBITRATION.

2 (a) MOTOR VEHICLE FRANCHISE CONTRACTS.—

3 Chapter 1 of title 9, United States Code, is amended by

4 adding at the end the following:

5 ‘‘§ 17. Motor vehicle franchise contracts

6 ‘‘(a) For purposes of this section, the term—

7 ‘‘(1) ‘motor vehicle’ has the meaning given such

8 term under section 30102(6) of title 49; and

9 ‘‘(2) ‘motor vehicle franchise contract’ means a

10 contract under which a motor vehicle manufacturer,

11 importer, or distributor sells motor vehicles to any

12 other person for resale to an ultimate purchaser and

13 authorizes such other person to repair and service

14 the manufacturer’s motor vehicles.

15 ‘‘(b) Whenever a motor vehicle franchise contract

16 provides for the use of arbitration to resolve a controversy

17 arising out of or relating to the contract, arbitration may

18 be used to settle such controversy only if after such con19 troversy arises both parties consent in writing to use arbi20 tration to settle such controversy.

21 ‘‘(c) Whenever arbitration is elected to settle a dis22 pute under a motor vehicle franchise contract, the arbi23 trator shall provide the parties to the contract with a writ24 ten explanation of the factual and legal basis for the

25 award.’’.
3

•S 1140 IS

1 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—

2 The table of sections for chapter 1 of title 9, United States

3 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘17. Motor vehicle franchise contracts.’’.

4 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

5 The amendments made by section 2 shall apply to

6 contracts entered into, amended, altered, modified, re7 newed, or extended after the date of the enactment of this

8 Act.

Æ
Hon. A. J. Hartel Opinion No. M-973

County Attorney P. 0. Box43I Re: Whether adistrict Liberty, Texas 77575 court bailiff mud be deputized as a Dear Mr. Hartel: deputy. sheriff.

Youhave asked the opinion of this office as to whether 

### adistrict court bailiff must be deputized as a deputy sheriff.

Provision for the furnishing of district court bailiffs is covered generally bgArticle 36.24, Code of 

### CriminalProcedure, 1965, which reads as follows:

“The sheriff of the dounty shall furnish the court with abailiff during the trial of any case to attend the wants of the jury and to act under the direction of the court. If the person furnished by the sheriff is to be called as awitness in the case he may not serve as bailiff.” While the foregolng ‘statute places the duty on the sherlff’to furnish bailiffs and while there is no restriction on the sheriff as to one of his deputies being the bailiff, there is equally no requirement imposed that abailiff bea deputy sheriff.

District courts.may also appoint bailiffs to attend grand juries under~the provisions of Article 19.36, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1965. Again, this Article imposes no requirement that abailiff so appointed be adeputy sheriff.

Additionally, many of the district courts of this state have special statutory provisions that govern the appointment of bailiffs intheir courts. ‘See Article 2292a, et seq., Vernon’s Civil Statutes and new enactments passed by the last legislature setting up bailiffs for particular courts, i.e. Acts 

### 62ndLegislature,R.S.,1971, Chapters 112 (page 879) and -4x3-Hon. A. J. Hartel, page 2. (M-973)



### 351

### (page1325). Norequirement that abailiff be adeputy sheriff is found in any of these special statutes.

Since wefind no statute which requires a'district court bailiff to~be a deputy sher;ff, our opinion is that a district court batliff is not required to be a deputy sheriff.
SUMMARY ------- The bailiff of a district court need not be a deputy sheriff.

General of Texas Prepared by Lonny F. Zwiener Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINIONCOMMITTEE Kerns Taylor, Chairman W.E. Allen, Co-Chairman John Banks Austin Bray Glenn Brown Howard Fender SAMMCDANIEL Staff Legal Assistant ALFREDWALKER Executive Assistant NOI. WHITE First Assistant

-4754-
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

29 April 2004

in Case C-418/01 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main): IMS Health GmbH & Co. OHG v NDC Health GmbH & Co. KG (1)

(Competition - Article 82 EC - Abuse of a dominant position - Brick structure used to supply regional sales data for pharmaceutical products in a Member State - Copyright - Refusal to grant a licence)

(2004/C 118/25)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-418/01: reference to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between IMS Health GmbH & Co. OHG and NDC Health GmbH & Co. KG - on the interpretation of Article 82 EC - the Court, composed of: P. Jann (Rapporteur), acting for the President of the Fifth Chamber, C. W. A. Timmermans and S. von Bahr, Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; H. A. Rühl, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 29 April 2004, in which it ruled:

----

(1)OJ C 3 of 5.1.2002

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1999 FORM 10-K OF HILLS BANCORPORATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          21,765
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   206
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    131,961
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          18,307
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            18,362
<LOANS>                                        575,131
<ALLOWANCE>                                      9,750
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 773,966
<DEPOSITS>                                     562,086
<SHORT-TERM>                                    26,714
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             18,249
<LONG-TERM>                                     95,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           10,953
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,214
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,050
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 773,966
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 41,933
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                8,733
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   455
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                51,121
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              20,826
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,313
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           24,808
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      900
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               (315)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 18,309
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,036
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       8,466
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,466
<EPS-BASIC>                                       5.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     5.66
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.83
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,320
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  9,265
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 8,856
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      763
<RECOVERIES>                                       757
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                9,750
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,750
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
1 

### IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA

___________________ WA LT ER JOEY

OVERSTREET, ) ) Cause No. DA 23

- 0664 Plaint iff /A ppellant , ) ) ORDER GRANTING MOTION ) TO WITHDRAW v s . ) ) ERIC FETTERHOFF, in his official ) and individual capacit ies, JOHN DOES 3

- 7, ) MONTANA HIGHWAY PATROL, ) and PARK COUNTY, MONTANA, ) a polit ic al subdivisi on , Bruce Becker, ) individually, and as Park County Attorney , ) Shannan Picco lo , i

ndividually, and as ) Deputy Park County

A ttorney, STATE OF ) MONTANA, and KENDRA LASSITER, ) Individually, and in her official capacit y as ) Park County Attorney

, ) ) Defendants /A

ppellees. )

___________________________________ ) Upon mo ti on by Suzanne Marshall Malloy , and good cause showing, th e mot io n to wi thdraw as attorney

of record i s hereby

GRANTED. IT IS ORDERED th at Suzanne Marshall Malloy shall be allowed to wit hdraw as co counsel for W

al ter Joey Overstreet. IT IS FUR

THER ORDERED that al l filings shall continue to be served on Jami Rebso m. ELECTRONICALL

Y SIGNED AND DA

TED BELOW

. cc: Jami Rebso m Elizabeth Leman Jennifer Morgan Mi tchell Y oung Suzanne Marshall Mallo y

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 19 2024

06/19/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0664