alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|  | This report is available in Hypertextand Portable Document Format (.pdf). See Helpfor more information about viewing publications in different formats.

**HyperText FormatHumanResources for Science & Technology: The European Region**

**Portable Document Format (.pdf)HumanResources for Science & Technology: The European Region** |
|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| **Note**: U.S. R&D data presented inthis report are based on statistics published in NSF/SRS **NationalPatterns of R&D Resources: 1994 (NSF 95-394)**. For updated U.S.data, see National Patterns of R&D Resources: 1996 (NSF 96-333), forthcoming. |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**
**Last updated February 26, 1997**
**
From: Megan France

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 6:21:22 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Megan France

611 Polo Drive

Wheaton, IL 60187
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                 PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                     436,997
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                         0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         67,993
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                      101,742
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  1,852
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                608,584
<COMMON>                                        5,848
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                     102,817
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            59,244
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                167,909
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          35,000
<PREFERRED>                                     2,224
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                          178,002
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             14,500
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                           0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                      0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   8,876
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                           0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                         0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                202,073
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                 608,584
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                     184,930
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            8,912
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    150,869
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    159,781
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        25,149
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  0
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 25,149
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        9,220
<NET-INCOME>                                   15,929
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       557
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  15,372
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        7,650
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       7,776
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         29,758
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    6.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    6.57
        

</TABLE>
#### MASONIC TEMPLE ASSOCIATION, OF ELIZABETH, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ERNEST E. KISTNER, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

Argued January 17, 1933

Decided September 15, 1933.

Before Justices Bodine and Donges.

Por the plaintiff-appellant, *Winard & Winard (Herman Winard).*

Por the defendant-appellee, *Alfred F. Orsini (John M. Kerner).*

Per Curiam.

Suit was brought upon an agreement to subscribe to a building fund to erect a masonic temple in Elizabeth. The subscription was to be paid in twenty-five equal monthly installments. The agreement was dated October 18th, 1922, and the suit was not brought until November 17th, 1930. The court rightly held the action, except as to the last installment, barred by the statute of limitations. *Comp. Stat., p.*3162.

The statute reads as follows: “All actions of debt, founded upon any lending or contract without specialty, * * *

shall be commenced and sued within six years next after the cause of such actions shall have accrued, and not after.”

The appellant’s argument is based on the proposition that an action of debt will not lie at common law for a particular installment until all installments are due. 18 *Corp. Jur.*8, *762§ 13. The fact is, however, that the statute begins to run against each installment as it falls due. 37 *C. J.*854, § 217. Although a common law action in debt might not lie for the recovery of each installment an action in assumpsit would lie. The action as now brought under the Practice act of 1912 is an action at law and such action could have been brought for each of the installments as they fell due. Such being the law, the statute has run against each of the installments due more than siz years before the action was brought. *Berry*v. *Doremus,*30 *N. J. L.*399.

The judgment is affirmed.
----

(2004/C 88 E/0748)

CORRIGENDA

Corrigendum to the answer to Written Question P-2323/03 by Mrs Schreyer on behalf of the Commission

(‘Official Journal of the European Union’ C 65 E of 13 March 2004)

On page 131, point 2. (b) should read as follows:

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.2

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT

The Board of Directors

CT Communications, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements (Registration Nos. 33-59641,
33-59643, 33-59645, 333-15537, 333-30125, 333-38895, 333-77323,
333-65818, and 333-65846) of CT Communications, Inc. of our
report dated February 27, 2003, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Palmetto MobileNet, L.P. as of
December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the related consolidated
statements of income and partners equity, and cash flows
for each of the three years ended December 31, 2002, 2001,
and 2000, which report is included in the December 31, 2002
Annual Report on Form 10-K of CT Communications, Inc.



| |                                      
| | -------------------------------------
| | /s/ Bauknight Pietras & Stormer, P.A.

Columbia, South Carolina

March 27, 2003
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of South Jersey
Gas Company (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Edward J. Graham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
Edward J. Graham


-----------------------------------------------------


Name:  Edward
J. Graham


Title:  Chief
Executive Officer


May 13,
2008
**Exhibit
      32.2**











CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of South Jersey
      Gas Company (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      David A. Kindlick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      David
      A. Kindlick


-------------------------------------------------------


Name:
      David A. Kindlick


Title:
      Chief Financial Officer


May
      11,
      2007
# Úřední věstník C 152/9. č

| | ISSN 1725-5163 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 152 |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Svazek 479. června 2004 |

ISSN 1725-5163

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 152

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Svazek 479. června 2004

---

| Oznámeníč. | Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Informace |
| | Komise |
| 2004/C 152/1 | Směnné kurzy vůči euro | 1 |

Oznámeníč.

Obsah

Strana

I   Informace

Komise

2004/C 152/1

Směnné kurzy vůči euro

1

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

I Informace

Komise

| 9.6.2004 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | C 152/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2004

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

C 152/1

---

Směnné kurzy vůči euro (1)

8. června 2004

(2004/C 152/01)

1 euro=

| | měna | směnný kurz |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | americký dolar | 1,2294 |
| JPY | japonský jen | 135,08 |
| DKK | dánská koruna | 7,4349 |
| GBP | britská libra | 0,66840 |
| SEK | švédská koruna | 9,1040 |
| CHF | švýcarský frank | 1,5229 |
| ISK | islandská koruna | 87,36 |
| NOK | norská koruna | 8,1885 |
| BGN | bulharský lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | kyperská libra | 0,58300 |
| CZK | česká koruna | 31,243 |
| EEK | estonská koruna | 15,6466 |
| HUF | maďarský forint | 251,15 |
| LTL | litevský litas | 3,4527 |
| LVL | lotyšský latas | 0,6623 |
| MTL | maltská lira | 0,4263 |
| PLN | polský zlotý | 4,5957 |
| ROL | rumunský lei | 40 758 |
| SIT | slovinský tolar | 239,1500 |
| SKK | slovenská koruna | 39,870 |
| TRL | turecká lira | 1 811 841 |
| AUD | australský dolar | 1,7507 |
| CAD | kanadský dolar | 1,6520 |
| HKD | hongkongský dolar | 9,5838 |
| NZD | novozélandský dolar | 1,9568 |
| SGD | singapurský dolar | 2,0990 |
| KRW | jihokorejský won | 1 423,46 |
| ZAR | jihoamerický rand | 8,0262 |

měna

směnný kurz

USD

americký dolar

1,2294

JPY

japonský jen

135,08

DKK

dánská koruna

7,4349

GBP

britská libra

0,66840

SEK

švédská koruna

9,1040

CHF

švýcarský frank

1,5229

ISK

islandská koruna

87,36

NOK

norská koruna

8,1885

BGN

bulharský lev

1,9558

CYP

kyperská libra

0,58300

CZK

česká koruna

31,243

EEK

estonská koruna

15,6466

HUF

maďarský forint

251,15

LTL

litevský litas

3,4527

LVL

lotyšský latas

0,6623

MTL

maltská lira

0,4263

PLN

polský zlotý

4,5957

ROL

rumunský lei

40 758

SIT

slovinský tolar

239,1500

SKK

slovenská koruna

39,870

TRL

turecká lira

1 811 841

AUD

australský dolar

1,7507

CAD

kanadský dolar

1,6520

HKD

hongkongský dolar

9,5838

NZD

novozélandský dolar

1,9568

SGD

singapurský dolar

2,0990

KRW

jihokorejský won

1 423,46

ZAR

jihoamerický rand

8,0262

---

(1)

Zdroj: referenční směnné kurzy jsou publikovány ECB.

---
#### ERNEST L. BANKS, ETHEL M. BANKS, ROBERT C. WILSON, Jr., AND EDNA S. WILSON, PLAINTIFFS, v. JAMES H. BOLTON, DEFENDANT.

Decided July 5, 1933.

Tor the motion, *Whiting & Moore.*

Opposed, *Frederick A. Pope.*

Lawrence, S. C. C.

This is a motion to strike the answer filed in this cause on the ground that it is sham. The factual situation, as disclosed by the complaint and affidavits, appears to be that on November 11th, 1932, plaintiffs Ethel M. Hance and Edna B. Wilson were riding in an automobile owned and operated by defendant. It became involved in an accident, said to have been due to the careless driving of defendant, and the two women were injured. They and their *566husbands retained counsel and suit was about to be brought when the respective attorneys for the parties entered into an agreement for settlement whereby defendant was to pay Mr. and Mrs. Banks $2,500 and Mrs. Wilson and her husband a like sum in consideration of their refraining from bringing a suit for compensation. This agreement is admitted in defendant’s answer, but it is set up that plaintiffs breached it by bringing the present suit, whereupon the answer proceeds to deny the negligence charged, alleging that the women plaintiffs were mere licensees in defendant’s car at the time of the accident and that there was no willful negligence on his part. This answer is apparently misconceived, in that it is made to rest on a denial of negligence upon the theory that the complaint is based on such negligence, whereas in fact it is made to set forth a breach of the agreement to settle and a recovery of the amount of the settlement is thereby sought. It is not laid on the original cause of action for negligence, which is referred to only as recital leading to the agreement to settle, and the answer, therefore, does not appear germane, excepting as to its admission that the agreement in question was made, and a denial of paragraph nine of the complaint that a reasonable time has elapsed for the payment of the amount agreed upon in settlement of the original claim and that a cause of action has arisen to recover' it. It' does not appear, however, that the time for payment was stipulated by the attorneys and the complaint accordingly rests on the. rule of reasonable time. The facts and circumstances as to defendant’s ability to pay and when are not set forth in the affidavits, although the statement is made in his own that following the agreement to settle he made an effort to raise the money, but could not. What is a reasonable time may be a question of law or one of fact, depending on the conditions, circumstances and facts in a given case. Here it would seem that the affidavits do not disclose sufficient information to justify the court in regarding the question of reasonable time as of law rather than of fact. Since it is therefore regarded as a question of fact, it follows that the motion to strike the answer will have to be denied, costs to abide the result of the suit.
From: Jim Topsale/R3/USEPA/US To: Ketan Patel/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 05/05/2010 04:47 PM Subject: Re: 60.37e Provisions

________________________________________ Ketan, It may be too late for the rule revisions, but I have one comment. Revise 60.39e(d)(3) to read, "...require expeditious compliance with the emission guidelines..." Jim T.
Task Force 59 Completes Digital Horizon Event
 
  By U.S. Naval Forces Central Command Public Affairs
  U.S. 5th Fleet concluded Digital Horizon, Dec. 15, a three-week unmanned and artificial intelligence event in Bahrain that involved 17 industry partners.
The event included 15 advanced systems, 10 of which operated in the Middle East for the first time. Task Force 59 led industry partners during phased evolutions ashore and at sea to advance fleet efforts that will enhance regional maritime awareness.
“The pace of innovation throughout Digital Horizon was unbelievable,” said Capt. Michael Brasseur, commander of Task Force 59. “We pushed beyond technological boundaries and discovered new capabilities for maritime domain awareness to enhance our ability to see above, on and below the water.”
During Digital Horizon, Task Force 59 leveraged artificial intelligence to create an interface on one screen, also called a “single pane of glass.” The screen displayed relevant data from multiple unmanned systems for watchstanders in Task Force 59’s Robotics Operations Center.
The task force also launched an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) from USCGC Emlen Tunnell (WPC 1145), marking the first time Task Force 59 operated a UAV from a U.S. Coast Guard cutter. The launch also enhanced Task Force 59’s ability to create a mesh network for unmanned systems to relay imagery to command centers ashore and at sea in a communications denied environment.
“It has been an incredible opportunity to work with new systems and new partners to drive the innovation process forward for the U.S. Navy,” said Lt. Jay Faylo, the task force’s director of artificial intelligence.
Over the past year, Task Force 59 has operated unmanned surface vessels in regional waters for more than 25,000 hours, which equates to 12 years of nine-to-five testing five days a week.
NAVCENT is headquartered in Manama, Bahrain and includes maritime forces operating in the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, Red Sea, parts of the Indian Ocean and three critical choke points at the Strait of Hormuz, Suez Canal and Bab al-Mandeb.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 168 (Thursday, August 31, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 60209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18988]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 12:02 p.m. on Tuesday, August 29, 2023.

PLACE: The meeting was held in the Board Room located on the sixth 
floor of the FDIC Building located at 550 17th Street NW, Washington, 
DC.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation met to consider matters related to the 
Corporation's supervision, corporate, and resolution activities. In 
calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Vice Chairman 
Travis J. Hill, seconded by Director Jonathan P. McKernan, and 
concurred in by Director Rohit Chopra (Director, Consumer Financial 
Protection Bureau), Director Michael J. Hsu (Acting Comptroller of the 
Currency), and Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, that the public interest 
did not require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to 
public observation; and that the matters could be considered in a 
closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), 
(c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(9)(B) of the ``Government in the 
Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), 
(c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(9)(B).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Requests for further information 
concerning the meeting may be directed to Debra A. Decker, Executive 
Secretary of the Corporation, at 202-898-8748.

    Dated this the 29th day of August, 2023.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
James P. Sheesley,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-18988 Filed 8-29-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.69 MB)
 
 U.S. BS 17 Bright Star 2017 Exercise Bright Star 17 Centcom
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 463 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 27, 2002.
    Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on the legislative day of 
Thursday, June 27, 2002, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House 
suspend the rules relating to the resolution (H. Res. 459) expressing the sense 
of the House of Representatives that Newdow v. U.S. Congress was erroneously 
decided, and for other purposes.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```