alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JESSE L. YOUNGBLOOD,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

SUPERIOR COURT OF BUTTE CO.;

STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

 Respondents - Appellees.

No. 13-17288

D.C. No. 2:13-cv-01490-GGH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Gregory G. Hollows, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted July 21, 2015*** 

Before: CANBY, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Jesse L. Youngblood appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his 28

U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition as second or successive. We have jurisdiction under

FILED

JUL 27 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** Appellant consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction.

 *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo, see Wentzell v. Neven, 674 F.3d 1124,

1126 (9th Cir. 2012), and we affirm.

Youngblood contends that the district court should not have deemed his

habeas petition second or successive under section 2244(b) because his first habeas

petition was not decided on the merits but rather dismissed as barred by the statute

of limitations. As Youngblood concedes, this argument is foreclosed by McNabb

v. Yates, 576 F.3d 1028, 1030 (9th Cir. 2009). We are bound by that decision. See

Hart v. Massanari, 266 F.3d 1155, 1171 (9th Cir. 2001) (“Once a panel resolves an

issue in a precedential opinion, the matter is deemed resolved, unless overruled by

the court itself sitting en banc, or by the Supreme Court.”).

AFFIRMED.

2 13-17288
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.37 MB)
 
 F-35 Aircraft Aviation F-35A F-35A Lightning II Fighter Jets Lightning
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### J. Daniel Ackerman v. Marcus Brounstein.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, on the ground that the case involves a question of law that ought to be reviewed by that court.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7521

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL O’SHEA DUVAL, a/k/a Big Mike,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-96-786)

Submitted: February 25, 1999 Decided: March 9, 1999

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael O’Shea Duval, Appellant Pro Se. Harold Watson Gowdy, III,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* The order from which Duval appeals was filed on September

15, 1998, and entered on the district court’s docket on September

16, 1998, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and 79(a). See

Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Michael O’Shea Duval appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reinstate his direct criminal appeal. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. Duval, No. CR-96-786 (D.S.C.

Sept. 16, 1998).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
From: gita patel

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:52:44 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

gita patel

1048 Continentals Way #23

APT 23

Belmont, CA 94002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
              Appendix A to Item 601(c) of Regulation S-K
                   Commercial and Industrial Companies
                        Article 5 of Regulation S-X
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       4,751,204
<SECURITIES>                                 2,711,699
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,978,698
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,803,419
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,925,957
<PP&E>                                     130,301,301
<DEPRECIATION>                              72,325,624
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             107,765,477
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,697,622
<BONDS>                                      4,074,000
<COMMON>                                    24,717,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          162,500
<PREFERRED>                                  1,692,041
<OTHER-SE>                                  49,863,061
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               107,765,477
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            56,354,801
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               38,802,557
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               335,958
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             581,764
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             19,777,367
<INCOME-TAX>                                 6,760,624
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         13,016,743
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                13,016,743
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    26.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    25.18
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 29, 2020

No. 04-20-00421-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.S., C.S., AND C.S., CHILDREN,

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CI00253

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s second motion for an extension of time to file its brief is GRANTED.

Appellant’s brief is due on or before January 7, 2021.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of December, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
combustionsurvey - Fw: Boiler MACT Rule- Additional Information for Reconsideration 

 

-----Forwarded by Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/16/2011 03:32PM -----

To: Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Buff, Dave" <DBuff@GOLDER.com> 

Date: 07/15/2011 06:07PM 

Subject: Boiler MACT Rule- Additional Information for Reconsideration 

(See attached file: Applicability of the F-Factor Method to Bagasse Fired Boilers Report.pdf)

Second of two emails. 

David A. Buff, P.E., Q.E.P. | Principal Engineer | Golder Associates Inc. 

6026 NW 1st Place, Gainesville, Florida, USA 32607 

Tel: +1 (352) 336-5600 ext. 21145 Fax: +1 (352) 336-6603 | Cell: +1 352 514-5600 | 

E: dbuff@golder.com | www.golder.com 

Work Safe, Home Safe 

This email transmission is confidential and may contain proprietary information for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. Any use, distribution or

copying of this transmission, other than by the intended recipient, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 

and delete all copies. Electronic media is susceptible to unauthorized modification, deterioration, and incompatibility. Accordingly, the electronic 

media version of any work product may not be relied upon. 

Please consider the environment before printing this email. 

 

 

= 

From: Brian Shrager <Shrager.Brian@epamail.epa.gov>

To: <combustionsurvey@erg.com>

Date: 7/16/2011 3:34 PM

Subject: Fw: Boiler MACT Rule- Additional Information for Reconsideration

Attachments: Applicability of the F-Factor Method to Bagasse Fired Boilers Report.pdf

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\GGibson\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4E21AF70DO... 8/2/2011
From: Yolanda Huet-Vaughn, M.D.

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 3:45:19 AM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Yolanda Huet-Vaughn, M.D.

3200 Strong Ave

Kansas City, Ks 66106
Premier Jets 

May3, 2012 

Federal Aviation Administration 

ATTN: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1000 

Washington, DC 20591 

RE: 2011 WP910359 

To Whom It May Concern, 0/ Did,- 6-470 

1r<ECEIVED 

MAY 1 Q 21112 

tiEARfNG DOCKET 

Premier jets, Inc. hereby requests a hearing on the above case. 

Roger B. Kelsay 

President 

Premier jets, Inc. 

2140 NE 25th Avenue 

Hillsboro, OR 97124 

CC: Michael F. McKinley 

Senior Attorney 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

P.O. Box 91430 • Portland, Oregon 97291-0430 • (503) 640-2927 • FAX (503) 681-3064
Eagle Resolve 2011 begins in United Arab Emirates
 By None  , CENTCOM Public Affairs
  UNITED ARAB EMIRATES – U.S. Forces joined their United Arab Emirates hosts and Gulf Cooperation Council regional partners yesterday to begin the twelfth annual multilateral exercise Eagle Resolve.  The exercise will be conducted at various locations throughout the United Arab Emirates. Eagle Resolve is a multinational event designed to support the Cooperative Defense Program.  This year’s scenarios will focus on: regional consequence management; chemical, biological and radiological nuclear-passive defense; medical countermeasures; and interdiction and border security. Eagle Resolve demonstrates U.S. Central Command’s dedication to GCC regional partners and the combined efforts to sustain regional security and stability. “Our participation in Eagle Resolve highlights our unrelenting commitment to the territorial integrity of our GCC partners,” said General James N. Mattis, USMC, Commander, U.S. CENTCOM. “Working together, our combined efforts are guided by the need to sustain regional security. Eagle Resolve will allow us to operate together as a team—it brings the U.S. forces an opportunity to learn from our Gulf partners and they from us in this regard, practicing how we will protect the region’s populations if threatened.” Regularly scheduled exercises such as Eagle Resolve allow U.S. forces the opportunity to operate with, contribute to, and learn from their Gulf partners, all while promoting long-term peace in the region. Eagle Resolve provides multilateral forces with the opportunity to increase proficiency, expand levels of cooperation, enhance maritime capabilities, promote long-term regional stability, and promote interoperability.  The exercise will involve approximately 300 U.S. military personnel from all services, along with U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy aircraft and ships. Questions can be addressed to U.S. Central Command at 813-827-5895.
From: Donna Moreno

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 10:30:40 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Donna Moreno

9440 nw 11 st

plantation, fl 33322
<PAGE>   1

                          [Letterhead of Ernst & Young]

March 27, 2000

Arthur Andersen & Co.
1345 Avenue of the Americas
New York, N.Y. 10105
U.S.A.

Dear Sirs,

                  Re :Consent Of Independent Public Accountant

As independent public accountant of Shmay Bar (T.H.) 1993 Ltd., we hereby
consent to the incorporation of our report included in this Form 10K, into the
company's previously filed Registration Statement File No. 33-51023, and No.
55137.


                                                 /s/ Kost Forer & Gabbay
                                                   KOST FORER & GABBAY
                                         A Member of Ernst & Young International
<PAGE>   1

  [LETTERHEAD OF DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU BRIGHTMAN BAR-LEVAV FRIEDMAN & CO.]

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants of Am-Hal Ltd., we hereby consent to the
incorporation of our report dated February 16, 1999, included in Form 10-K of
Ampal-American Israel Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1998, into
Ampal-American Israel Corporation's previously filed Registration Statements No.
33-51023 and No. 33-55137.

/s/ Brightman Bar-Levav Friedman & Co.

Brightman Bar-Levav Friedman & Co.

Certified Public Accountants

March 25, 1999
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6838** 

GEORGE CLEVELAND, III , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. JUDGE DANIEL D. HALL, in his official capacity as Circuit Court Judge of South Carolina; KAREN C. RATIGAN, in her official capacity as Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General of South Carolina , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville

. R. Bryan Harwell , District Judge. ( 6:15

- cv - 0 4384

- RBH )

Submitted : November 22, 2016 Decided: November 28, 2016

Before DIAZ and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

George Cleveland, III , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: George Cleveland, III , appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (20 12 ) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Cleveland v. Hall , No. 6:15

- cv - 04384

- RBH (D.S.C. May 18, 2016)

.
We grant Cleveland’s motion to accept as timely filed his
informal brief , and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
-----Original Message----- 

From: Richard Strilec [mailto:rastrilec@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2010 10:42 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Suggestion-EBSA proposed rules 2/02/10 

 Please allow me to suggest be example- I had to retire after some 

38 years of service in May of 2009- My employer had provided health 

benefits since at least the early 1960's- and I retired with these 

benefits. 

Well some 74 days later I (110 other retirees) received a letter saying 

that our health benefits are being eliminated in 30 days. 

 We are ALL being thrust into this medical travesty, but an agency 

dropping people ( especially the retirees)- is only aiding their cause 

and they are spreading problem out providing a solution. 

 I met even with the Board of Trustees at my agency to see if they 

would cancel this benefit- effective to any future retirees and 

suggested that those as myself (who had retired with these benefits ) 

be grandfathered in paying 35%( akin to your ARRA)- Well they denied 

any of our options and basically this group of 110 as many others had 

to go out to fiend for themselves. 

 My point is very simple- companies that do this are legally within 

bounds though morally wrong. 

 I suggest that any one in the past two years who retired with a 

health package only to have it removed later -be placed into medicareNOT the panaceas but it will duct tape this travesty. 

 Secondly from a set date(say February20,2010) any company that 

choses to discontinue health benefits to their retirees will have to 

participate with the ARRA 35-65 COBRA for that retiree until they 

are medicare eligible . 

 Sincerely, 

 Richard A. Strilec 

1336 Route 21 

Ghent, New York 

 12075 

518-392-2093 

rastrilec@yahoo.com
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 40

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Rules in the One

Hundred Seventh Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 14, 2001

Mr. DREIER (for himself and Mr. MOAKLEY) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on

Rules in the One Hundred Seventh Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Rules (here4 after in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Committee’’),

5 including the expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be

6 paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House of Rep7 resentatives for committee salaries and expenses, not more

8 than $5,370,773 for the One Hundred Seventh Congress.

9 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

10 Of the amount specified in section 1—
2

•HRES 40 IH

1 (1) not more than $2,644,509 shall be available

2 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

3 noon on January 3, 2001, and ending immediately

4 before noon on January 3, 2002; and

5 (2) not more than $2,726,264 shall be available

6 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

7 noon on January 3, 2002, and ending immediately

8 before noon on January 3, 2003.

9 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

10 Payments under this resolution shall be made on

11 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

12 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner

13 directed by the Committee on House Administration.

14 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

15 Amounts made available under this resolution shall

16 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by

17 the Committee on House Administration.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CCFNB BANCORP, INC.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation for the
dates and periods covered by the Report.3.
    
    This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the
Principal Executive Officer of the Corporation with the requirements of section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be used by any person or for any reason
other than as specifically required by law.
 Date:  March 8, 2011
    /s/ Lance O. DiehlLance O. DiehlPresident and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer) 75
#### Samuel S. Free, Respondent, v. Martha A. Fancher, Appellant.

Order overruling exceptions denying new trial and directing judgment reversed, and new trial granted; costs to abide event; reference vacated. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.