alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### John Barrons, Respondent, v. William McDougall, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Bockes, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          47,621
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,446
<ALLOWANCES>                                       171
<INVENTORY>                                     44,813
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               318,539
<PP&E>                                         263,811
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,285
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 889,472
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          276,153
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           114
<OTHER-SE>                                    (31,279)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   889,472
<SALES>                                        526,081
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               526,081
<CGS>                                          505,969
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  505,969
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,175
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,972
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,993
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,212
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,564)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,564)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.93)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.93)


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William Cook, Appellant.

Declined to be considered for tbe reason that no judgment appears in the record.
--------------------
    EXHIBIT 99.2
--------------------



                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
                   1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of USURF America,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  March  31,  2003,  as  filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Christopher  K. Brenner,  Vice  President of Finance and  Administration,  Chief
Financial Officer (Principal  Accounting  Officer) and Secretary of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Dated: May 20, 2003.                /s/ Christopher K. Brenner
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Christopher K. Brenner
                                   Vice President of Finance and Administration,
                                   Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting
                                   Officer) and Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 5, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 60730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19105]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12167]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Degas and the Laundress: 
Women, Work, and Impressionism'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad 
pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``Degas and the Laundress: Women, 
Work, and Impressionism'' at The Cleveland Museum of Art, Cleveland, 
Ohio, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be 
determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their 
temporary exhibition or display within the United States as 
aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c6b5a3a5b2afa9a8f4f2f3ff86b5b2a7b2a3e8a1a9b0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b5c6d0d6c1dcdadb8781808cf5c6c1d4c1d09bd2dac3">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 
2021.

Nicole L. Elkon,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2023-19105 Filed 9-1-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

# Foreign Trade

Skip top of page navigation

###### You are here: Census.gov › Business & Industry ›Foreign Trade › U.S. International Trade Data

                - Main
                - About
                - Data
                - Outreach
                - AES
                - Regulations
                - Reference
                - Definitions
                - Schedule B
                - FAQs

### More DATA

                          - Trade Highlights
                          - Balance by Partner Country
                          - Country/Product Trade
                          - State/Metropolitan Data
                          - Historical Series
                          - Notices and Corrections
                          - Related Party Trade
                          - Press Releases
                          - Data Products

### Important Links

                          - Global Reach Blog
                          - Newsletters
                          - ACE AESDirect
                          Related Sites- Business and Industry
- Briefing Room
- North American Industry                Classification System (NAICS)
Economic Indicator Database
                          Commodity Concordance - Monthly SubscriptionDownload a file- Click on the appropriate month below to download your file.
-  If you are having technical difficulties or need help, feel free to email us at eid.international.trade.data@census.gov or call 301-763-2311 for immediate assistance.
- Record	      layouts of the files are  available	      online .
Select Statistical Month:-  January 2019  
-  February 2019 
-   March 2019  
-   April 2019  
-   May 2019  
-   June 2019 
-   July 2019 
-   August 2019 
-   September 2019  
-   October 2019 
-   November 2019 
-   December 2019 

                          Export Training
Collection of videos to enhance export training.

Spanish Language Webinars 2020-2021 (Seminarios en Línea en Español 2020-2021)
2017 And Prior Year Webinars Archive.
Upcoming Outreach Activities
Upcoming Outreach Activities
Contact Us
				Contact the International Trade Macro Analysis Branch: Email us! or use our feedback form!

                  Call us: (301)763-2311 or 1-800-549-0595 option 4			  
CONNECT WITH US**********- Information Quality
- Data Linkage Infrastructure
- Data Protection and Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- FOIA
- Inspector General
- No FEAR Act
- U.S. Department of Commerce
- USA.gov

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
✕Is this page helpful?YesNo✕NO THANKS255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached✕Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions?  Source: U.S. Census Bureau | Foreign Trade |  ftdwebmastet@census.gov |     Last Revised:  June 17, 2022
#### Conner *v.*Flanders.

Submitted November 27,

Decided December 19, 1907.

Rule, from Emanuel superior court.

Motion to dismiss the writ of error.

*B. L. Strange, B. B. McCowen,*and *H. B. Strange,*for plaintiff in error. *Smith & Kirlcland,*contra.

Evans, J.

The bill of exceptions containing no entry of service on the opposite party, or waiver thereof, the same is

*Dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### White *et al. v.*North Georgia Electric Company *et al.*

Argued June 20,

Decided November 15, 1907.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Kimsey. Babun superior court. August 31, 1906.

*Spencer R. Atkinson, Brown & Randolph, J. J. Bowden,*and *R. B. A. Hamby,*for plaintiffs in error. *H. H. Dean,*contra.

Lumpkin, J.

1. This case is controlled by the decision in *White*v. *North Georgia Electric Go.,*128 *Ga.*539, where it was held that the petition was multifarious.

2. The grounds of equity sought to be set up by the petition are so interwoven,, that it is impracticable to determine whether there is any equity in any part of the multifarious allegations, dissociated from the rest; and no ruling is made on that point.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur, except*Holden,- *J., who did not preside.*
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











Certification of President and (Chief Executive Officer)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Industrial Minerals, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory Bowes, President and Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








May 16, 2011          /s/ Gregory Bowes


Gregory Bowes


President and CE0
Exhibit 99.1
                         Vital Health Technologies, Inc.
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                     AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     The undersigned, Halton Martin, the Chief Executive Officer of Vital Health
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") has executed this Certification in connection
with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's
amended Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the
"Report").

     The undersigned hereby certifies that:

o    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

o    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certification as of
the of March 31, 2003.

                                           /s/  Halton  Martin
                                           Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 23.1

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-1 (File No. 333-169255), and Form S-8 (File No. 333-177254) of Multiband Corporation and Subsidiaries of ourreports dated****March 31, 2012 on the consolidated financial statements and supplemental schedule which appear in this amendedannual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2011.

  

/s/ BAKER TILLY VIRCHOW KRAUSE, LLP

  

Minneapolis, Minnesota

October 19, 2012
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1018

To provide market loss assistance for apple producers.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 12, 2001

Mr. LEVIN (for himself, Ms. SNOWE, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. SCHUMER, Ms.

STABENOW, and Ms. CANTWELL) introduced the following bill; which was

read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and

Forestry

A BILL

To provide market loss assistance for apple producers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MARKET LOSS ASSISTANCE FOR APPLE PRO4 DUCERS.

5 (a) ASSISTANCE AVAILABLE.—The Secretary of Agri6 culture shall use the funds, facilities, and authorities of

7 the Commodity Credit Corporation, in an amount not to

8 exceed $250,000,000, to make payments, as soon as prac9 ticable after the date of the enactment of this Act, to apple

10 producers to provide relief for the loss of markets during

11 the 2000 crop year.
2

•S 1018 IS

1 (b) PAYMENT QUANTITY.—

2 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2),

3 the payment quantity of apples for which the pro4 ducers on a farm are eligible for payments under

5 this section shall be equal to the quantity of the

6 2000 crop of apples produced by the producers on

7 the farm.

8 (2) MAXIMUM QUANTITY.—The payment quan9 tity of apples for which the producers on a farm are

10 eligible for payments under this section shall not ex11 ceed 20,000,000 pounds of apples produced on the

12 farm.

13 (c) LIMITATIONS.—Subject to subsection (b)(2), the

14 Secretary shall not establish a payment limitation, or

15 gross income eligibility limitation, with respect to pay16 ments made under this section.

17 (d) APPLICABILITY.—This section applies only with

18 respect to the 2000 crops of apples and producers of that

19 crop.

Æ
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.06 MB)
 
 U.S. Army Central Soldiers partnered with Sailors from Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron 26 during a se Feb. 2. The units tested their ability to cooperate in a joint personnel recovery effort during a d
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### William J. Lormore and another, Plaintiff, v. Esek Page, Defendant.

Motion for new trial denied, and judgment ordered for the plaintiff on the verdict. Opinion by

Barker, J.;

Bradley, J., not sitting.
#### James M. Wiley v. State of Nebraska.

Filed November 10, 1920,

No. 21350.

Criminal Law: Sufficiency of Evidence. Evidence examined, and *held*sufficient to support the verdict of the jury. *Held,*that no prejudicial error occurred at the trial.

Error to the district court for Wayne county: Anson A. Welch, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*Mattheic Gering*and *G. H. Hendrickson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Clarence A. Davis, Attorney General, J. B. Barnes*and *Fred ¡3. Berry, contra.*

Aldrich, J.

The defendant was convicted by a jury of the crime of adultery and was sentenced by the court to serve one year *242in the county jail of Wayne county. He brings error proceedings to this court.

The record discloses that defendant was an instructor in the Wayne State Normal. He had been a school teacher nearly all his life. Kate Adams, prosecutrix, was a young unmarried woman about 24 years of age. It appears that she had been attending the Wayne State Normal irregularly for several years and was a school teacher by profession. In December, 1918, she filed a complaint against the defendant charging him with the crime of adultery and alleging that she had sexual intercourse with defendant on or about June 25, 1918, and again on or about September 22, 1918.

It is claimed the court erred in giving instruction No. 1, requested by the state; that the court abused its discretion in the order of proof in this case; that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict, there being no corroborating evidence; and that the court unduly limited the cross-examination.

The first error complained of is in giving instruction No. 1. There was no error in this for the instruction has' the support of section 8767, Rev. St. 1918.

The order of proof in a prosecution for adultery rests wholly within the sound discretion of the trial court, and this court has many times approved that rule. The prosecutrix is amply corroborated by admissions made by defendant and by other surrounding facts and circumstances.

This court has many times upheld and laid down the rule that a verdict of the jury will not be disturbed unless it is clearly wrong.

It is claimed that the trial court unduly restricted the cross-examination. We have examined the record and hold this alleged situation not to be true.

In conclusion, we hold that the defendant had a fair trial, that the jury found him guilty on sufficient evidence, that the court instructed it in accordance with the law of this state as laid down on the crime of adultery.

Judgment

Affirmed.
Docket: EBSA-2010-0007 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in 

Retirement Plans 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0007-0001 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options 

Document: EBSA-2010-0007-DRAFT-0035 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: John Scott 

Address: 

31815 N. 64th Street 

Cave Creek, AZ, 85331 

Email: saguarovet@gmail.com 

Phone: 602-909-4289 

Organization: private citizen 

General Comment 

I oppose this program. 

Annuities are too expensive and complicated for use by the general public. These complex, expensive 

private financial products should not be forced onto the American people. 

Social Security (i.e., OASDI and SSI) is the only annuity worthy of public support. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: March 01, 2010 

Received: February 19, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80aa896b 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=Print&PrintId=0900006480aa89... 3/1/2010
From: Gerri Duzenack

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: HHS Mandated coverage for contraceptives and abortifacients

Date: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 6:11:01 PM

Although these new HHS rules provides an exemption for religious employers, the church agency 

can only claim exemption if it primarily

serves people of its own faith. It also must meet other requirements, such as employing mostly people

of its own faith.

This violates our US Constitution's respect for religious liberty and freedom of conscience.

 The mandate will include FDA-approved drugs like Ella and Plan B that are misleadingly labeled 

'emergency contraceptives'.

 These drugs can actually destroy a developing baby prior to or after implanting in the mother's 

womb. HHS has failed to address this issue in spite of the

 many public comments.

 These interim rules completely ignore opinion, research and science that do not support a pro-abortion

ideology.

I urge you to reconsider the mandate imposed on pro-life Americans by these new HHS rules.

Respectfully,

Mrs. Geraldine Duzenack

agduz@comcast.net