alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Rockingham, )

May 7, 1912.

#### Portsmouth *v.*New Hampshire National Bank.

Bill in Equity, filed August 2, 1911. By a resolution adopted December 14, 1911, the city council directed the city solicitor to discontinue the suit and instructed the mayor to arrange for a dismissal of the bill and an entry of judgment for the defendants. December 19, the mayor requested the court to dispose of the litigation in accordance with the resolution. The court thereupon dimissed the bill and ordered judgment for the defendants, and the city solicitor excepted. Transferred from the October term, 1911, of the superior court by *Wallace,*C. J., on a bill of exceptions.

*Samuel W. Emery, Jr.,*city solcilor, *pro se.*

*Edwin G. Eastman, John W. Kelley,*and *Calvin Page,*for the defendants.

Young, J.

The city solicitor has no standing in this case, for he is not acting for the city, but in defiance of its wishes; that is, he is here, not for the purpose of doing what the city instructed him to do, but to prevent the city from doing it.

*Exception overruled.*

All concurred.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Handbook of forensic services
 
HTML: 1999| 2003
PDF: 2007 | 2013
 
SuDoc Number:J 1.14/18-3:
Item Number:0717-C-29 (online)
CGP System Number:000570365
 
 
 
** 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
August 28, 2017********
ex1032.htm










LOAN AGREEMENT


February 4, 2016







Tradex Capital Corp., (the “Lender”) of 888 Dunsmuir Street, Suite #1100, Vancouver, BC, V6C 3K4, advanced USD$50,000 (the “Principal Sum”) to Cell MedX Corp. (the “Borrower”) of 2857 Sumter Valley Circle, Henderson, NV 89052.  The Lender advanced the funds on February 4, 2016.







The Borrower agrees to repay the Principal Sum on demand, together with interest calculated and compounded monthly at the rate of 6% per year (the “Interest”) from February 4, 2016.  The Borrower is liable for repayment for the Principal Sum and accrued Interest and any costs that the Lender incurs in trying to collect the Principal Sum and the Interest.







 


The Borrower will evidence the debt and its repayment of the Principal Sum and the Interest with a promissory note in the attached form.


 


LENDER                                                                      BORROWER


Tradex Capital Corp.                                                Cell MedX Corp.







Per:                                                                               Per:












/s/ William Friesen                                                      /s/ Yanika Silina                                                                      


Authorized Signatory                                                Yanika Silina, CFO
















  





  











  








PROMISSORY NOTE







Principal Amount:  USD$50,000                                                                                                                                February 4, 2016












For value received Cell MedX Corp., (the “Borrower”) promises to pay on demand to the order of Tradex Capital Corp. (the “Lender”) the sum of $50,000 lawful money of United States (the “Principal Sum”) together with interest on the Principal Sum from February 4, 2016 (“Effective Date”) both before and after maturity, default and judgment at the Interest Rate as defined below.







For the purposes of this promissory note, Interest Rate means 6 per cent per year.  Interest at the Interest Rate must be calculated and compounded monthly not in advance from and including the Effective Date (for an effective rate of 6.2% per annum calculated monthly), and is payable together with the Principal Sum when the Principal Sum is repaid.







The Borrower may repay the Principal Sum and the Interest in whole or in part at any time.







The Borrower waives presentment, protest, notice of protest and notice of dishonour of this promissory note.



























BORROWER


Cell MedX Corp.







Per:












/s/ Yanika Silina







Yanika Silina, CFO
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 11.1
                        VISTA MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
               STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE DATA

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                    Three Months Ended June 30,         Six Months Ended June 30,
                                                                  -------------------------------     -----------------------------
                                                                       2000             1999              2000            1999
                                                                  -------------   ---------------     -------------    ------------
<S>                                                               <C>             <C>                 <C>              <C>
Net income (loss) .............................................   $    (966,303)  $   (3,289,139)     $  (1,963,270)   $ (5,958,470)
Weighted average common shares outstanding ....................      19,144,183       13,605,782         16,420,862      13,537,059
                                                                  -------------   ---------------     -------------    ------------
Shares used in basic and diluted loss per share ...............      19,144,183       13,605,782         16,420,862      13,537,059
                                                                  =============   ===============     =============    ============
Basic and diluted loss per share ..............................   $       (0.05)  $        (0.24)     $       (0.12)   $      (0.44)
                                                                  =============   ===============     =============    ============

</TABLE>
Marines, Afghan National Army play volleyball to strengthen relationship
 By Cpl. Ned Johnson , 1st Marine Division
  CENTCOM
 FORWARD OPERATING BASE JACKSON, Afghanistan (Nov. 19, 2010) — Marines and Afghan soldiers have fought many battles together in Sangin District, but today they faced off against each other in a different battle. Marines with India Company, 3rd Battalion, 5th Marine Regiment played volleyball against Afghan National Army soldiers in a friendly match at ANA Post Nabi, Nov. 16. The patrol’s mission was to visit a local ANA post to see if the Marines could help in any way, but not long after they arrived the Marines had another mission. “When we got to the compound, we saw the volleyball court and our lieutenant said we might play the ANA,” said Lance Cpl. Joseph Palmer, an infantryman with India Company, 3rd Bn., 5th Marines. “So we got our players together and challenged them to a game.” The Afghan commander insisted that his soldiers were very good at volleyball and even said they have beaten the local Afghan special forces team. The stage was set for a friendly match between forces. Each team then picked its best six players and the game began. “They were good and knew the rules pretty well,” Palmer said. “It was fun to watch their best player hit our guys with the volleyball.” The Marines did not seem prepared in the first two games and lost by a total of 30-7. But the Marines tried to rally back in the third game, but fell short, losing 15-11. However, the Marines did not leave with their heads down. “Even though we lost we still had a good time and had some fun,” said Petty Officer 3rd Class Erik Nowak, a corpsman with India Company, 3rd Bn., 5th Marines.  While the game was fun for both sides, it was more important than just that. “This shows that we aren’t here to take over their country, but to help them and be friends with them,” said Palmer, a 21-year-old native of Oriville, Calif. “Whether we are fighting beside them or playing volleyball, we are here to help them.” Palmer also said the game built a stronger relationship between the two forces who live, train, and fight together. During the games, spectators from both sides cheered and clapped. At the end of the match-up, laughter and smiles were shared by everyone. The Marines, who patrol the local area daily, said they would practice and come back for another match with the Afghan soldiers. Until then, the two forces will continue to provide security for the area.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the report of iVOW, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Bradford Hanson, Vice President ofFinance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. That information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 

Date: November 14, 2005

 
|   |   | /s/ J. Bradford Hanson                 |   |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |   | J. Bradford Hanson                     |   |   |
|   |   | Vice  President of Finance,            |   |   |
|   |   | Chief  Financial Officer and Secretary |   |   |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Giuseppe Cerelli, Appellant.

(Argued May 7, 1912;

decided May 21, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, rendered February 28, 1911, at a Trial Term for the county of Westchester, upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of murder in the first degree.

*James F. Dalton*for appellant.

*Francis A. Winslow, District*Attorney, for respondent.

Judgment *of*conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
```

[House Report 107-591]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                            Rept. 107-591
 2d Session               HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES        Part 2
======================================================================
 
       COMBATTING ILLEGAL GAMBLIING REFORM AND MODERNIZATION ACT

                                _______
                                

                October 16, 2002.--Ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

 Mr. Sensenbrenner, from the Committee on the Judiciary, submitted the 
                               following

                          SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

                        [To accompany H.R. 3215]

    House Report 107-591, Part 1, relating to H.R. 3215, the 
``Combatting Illegal Gambling Reform and Modernization Act,'' 
omitted explanatory language that was intended to be included 
in the original report filed by the Committee on the Judiciary 
on July 18, 2002. This supplemental report contains the omitted 
language.
    The third sentence of the fourth paragraph of the matter 
under the heading ``Section 2. Definitions'' in the Section-by-
Section Analysis and Discussion portion of House Report 107-
591, Part 1 should read as follows:
    ``Also, such computer and video games, including those that 
feature real sports teams and/or teams that are members of an 
amateur or professional sports organization, do not involve the 
staking or risking by any person of something of value.'' \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \1\ The italicized portion constitutes the language that was 
ommitted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

                              


```
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 8

Providing for the designation of certain minority employees.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Mr. FROST submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Providing for the designation of certain minority employees.

1 Resolved, That pursuant to the Legislative Pay Act

2 of 1929, as amended, the six minority employees author3 ized therein shall be the following named persons, effective

4 January 3, 2001, until otherwise ordered by the House,

5 to-wit: Steve Elmendorf, George Kundanis, Moses

6 Mercado, Sharon Daniels, Dan Turton, and Laura Nich7 ols, each to receive gross compensation pursuant to the

8 provisions of House Resolution 119, Ninety-fifth Con9 gress, as enacted into permanent law by section 115 of

10 Public Law 95–94. In addition, the Minority Leader may
2

•HRES 8 ATH

1 appoint and set the annual rate of pay for up to three

2 further minority employees.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) 10 Q
9-30-97 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) 10 Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,675
<SECURITIES>                                    44,738
<RECEIVABLES>                                  118,325
<ALLOWANCES>                                       924
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               119,814
<PP&E>                                           5,110
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 174,924
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          153,178
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,728
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,018
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   174,924
<SALES>                                          9,318
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,860
<CGS>                                            4,434
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,434
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,339
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    45
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,042
<INCOME-TAX>                                       548
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,494
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,494
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.08
        

</TABLE>
Order entered July 8, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01358-CV

JUAN CRUZ, Appellant

V.

DEUTCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-04351-C

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s July 6, 2015 third motion for an extension of time to file a brief 

TO THE EXTENT that appellant shall file a brief AUGUST 7, 2015. We caution appellant 

that no further extension of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6194

WENDELL SHANNON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS CORCORAN, Warden; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA97-3967-S)

Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: May 4, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wendell Shannon, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Shannon v. Corcoran, No. CA-97-3967-S (D.

Md. Feb. 2, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 8:52 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB39

I support the changes articulated in RIN 1210-AB39!

Re: RIN 1210-AB39

I am writing to comment on the Proposed Regulations issued by the Department of Labor, 

Employee Benefits Security Administration on November 18, 2015 (“Proposed Regulations”).

First of all, I want to commend the Department of Labor (“Department”) for this very 

constructive proposal. I strongly approve of the comment made by the Department in the 

preamble that “disability claimants deserve protections equally as stringent as those that 

Congress and the President have put into place for health care claimants under the Affordable 

Care Act.”

I am presently a disability recipient under an employer-sponsored disability plan governed by 

the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) and its requirements 

regarding claims procedures. I can speak first hand to the potential abuses occurring under the 

current claims-procedure regulations and the urgent need to address these in the Proposed 

Regulations.

The proposed tightening of the conflict-of-interest rules is particularly welcome. Prohibition 

against a claims fiduciary (typically the insurance carrier insuring the disability claim under the 

employer plan) making any decisions regarding hiring, compensation, termination, promotion or 

similar matters with respect to any individual (such as a claims adjustor or medical expert), 

based on the likelihood that the individual will support the limitation or denial of disability 

benefits, should—going forward—help eliminate, or substantially reduce, the documented 

cases of such behavior by disability insurance carriers, most notably Unum/Provident (see John 

H. Lanbein, Susan J. Stabile, Bruce A. Wolk, Pension and Employee Benefit Laws at pp. 669-74). 

The insurance carrier would not be permitted to contract with a medical expert based on the 

expert’s pattern of denying claims, as is clearly the typical situation today, which I know from 

my own experience. This will, I hope, add a measure of integrity to independent medical exams 

(IMEs) used so frequently to contest, and ultimately deny, a disability claim notwithstanding the 

opinion of the claimant’s doctor.

Please implement RIN 1210-AB39 to provide a more fair process.

Thank you

Sent from my iPhone
https://fdms.erulemaking.net/.../component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=Print&PrintId=0900006480b3bca5&Comment=true[8/27/2010 9:06:12 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: August 27, 2010

Received: August 26, 2010

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 80b3bca5

Comments Due: August 27, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: HHS-OS-2010-0014

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Preexisting Condition Exclusions, Lifetime and Annual Limits,

Rescissions, and PatientProtections

Comment On: HHS-OS-2010-0014-0001

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Preexisting Condition Exclusions, Lifetime and Annual Limits,

Rescissions, and PatientProtections

Document: HHS-OS-2010-0014-DRAFT-0039

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-15278

Submitter Information

Name: Emma Thorne

Organization: NAMI

General Comment

Lifetime cap for inpatient mental health treatment of 190 days under Medicare needs to be removed. It is

discriminatory. Under Medicaid for mental illness, a patient must be able to choose amongst all the providers,

private or otherwise. Mental illness must be integrated into all systems of medical disciplines. Not to have the

access creates very tragic outcomes and increases cost. Rehabilitation should take place like any other

neurological disease. Waivers in in-home healthcare policy should be owned by the patient. 

Thank you.