alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of 1

1<£G- JJ ~ 4J.2 - JtJ 

.LEGAL PROCESSING DMSION 


PUBLICATION It REGULATIONS 


As of: August 20, 2010 

Received: August 09, 2010 

Status: Posted 

BRANCH 

PUBLIC 

Posted: AUgust 20, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2c6fc SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, ;WlO 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS·2010·0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS·201O·001O·0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0270 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010·14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: Michael Teytelbaum 

Address: 

Marietta, 

Organization: American Chiropractic Association 

Government Agency Type: Federal 

Government Agency: HRSA 

General Comment 

See attached file(s) 

Attachments 

IRS-2010-0010-0270.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

https:llfdrns.erulernaking.netlfdrns-web-agency/cornponentlsubrnitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/20/2010 
August 9, 2010 

Office ofConsumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCII0-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-2010­

0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part ofthe new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these 

regulations. 

Michael Teytelbaum
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                            9683
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           45985
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  1480
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              97
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                97
<LOANS>                                         409053
<ALLOWANCE>                                       2045
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  503324
<DEPOSITS>                                      363006
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               5984
<LONG-TERM>                                       2000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            44
<OTHER-SE>                                      132334
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  503324
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  23758
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 4144
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 27902
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               12775
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               12776
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            15126
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      310
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   7152
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   9251
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        9251
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      5671
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.39
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.22
<LOANS-NON>                                        894
<LOANS-PAST>                                       151
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   687
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   4065
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  1796
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       65
<RECOVERIES>                                         4
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 2045
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              2045
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```

[House Report 107-612]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     107-612

======================================================================

 
 WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT TO THE 
  SAME DAY CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED BY THE RULES 
                               COMMITTEE

                                _______
                                

  July 25 (legislative day of July 24), 2002.--Referred to the House 
                   Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

    Ms. Pryce, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 501]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 501, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution waives clauses 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring 
a two-thirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is 
reported from the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions 
reported from the Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver 
to any special rule reported on the legislative day of 
Thursday, July 25, 2002, providing for consideration or 
disposition of the bill (H.R. 5005) to establish the Department 
of Homeland Security, and for other purposes.

                                

```
LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION nest | 4IQ-10
PUBLICATION S REGULATIONS pGUBIL 16

Page | of 1

AUG 2 $ 2010

IAs of: August 23, 2010

PUBLIC pears 8 0

Posted: August 23, 2010

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0311
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Cindra Lee Henry
Address:

15101 Magnolia Blvd.

Sherman Oaks, CA, 91403
Email: cindraleehenry@yahoo.com

General Comment

See attached file(s)

Attachments

IRS-2010-0010-0311.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

http://fdms.erulemaking .net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call-...

8/23/2010


August 9, 2010

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating
to Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

Sincerely,
Cindra Lee Henry
Page | of 2

SEP 3 2010 REC- WSyfa-/6

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS
BRANCH

As of: September 03, 2010

PUBLIC Status: Posted

posted: September ony 2010
SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0665
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

— —
Submitter Information

Name: philip j dow
Address:

25 governors rd

milton, MA, 02186
Submitter's Representative: REp Lynch boston

—

General Comment

8-12-2010

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Finat Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status
as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not

https://fdms.erulemaking .net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 9/3/2010


Page 2 of 2

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

Philip J Dow

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 9/3/2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,300
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,963,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                   408,100
<INVENTORY>                                  5,445,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,109,600
<PP&E>                                       6,201,400
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,166,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,201,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,069,000
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                     8,616,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (973,600)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,201,600
<SALES>                                     34,977,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            34,977,000
<CGS>                                       24,266,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,266,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (11,900)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,067,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,210,900)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,210,900)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,210,900)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.03)




</TABLE>
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.74 MB)
 
 New Jersey Army National Guard Medics Armor 88th 88th Readiness Division USCENTCOM Army USAR aviation U.S. Central Command Reserve U.S. Army Central medevac Dustoff Eager Lion 19 EAGERLION19 5-159 88RD
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
LEGAL PRGCUSSi G DIVIS: Y f
PUBLICATION a czcULAIONs /) EC °/I54/ 2-6
; BRANCH, ; :

Page 1 of 1

SEP 0 1 2010

As of: August 31, 2010

PUBLIC Status: Posted

Posted: August 31, 2010

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0519
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Angelia F Knight
Address:

30 Pepper Ridge Ct.

Gray, TN, 37615
Email: angeliafk@comcast.net
Submitter's Representative: ACA
Organization: JCCC

General Comment

See attached file(s)

Attachments

IRS-2010-0010-0519.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call-...

8/31/2010


August 11, 2010

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to
Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

Angelia F Knight
Amendment to the 1994 Plan, effective March 2, 2004



 Exhibit 10.6 
  
 Amendment to the 
 Toys “R” Us, Inc. Amended and Restated 
 1994 Stock Option and Performance Incentive Plan 
  
 The Toys “R” Us, Inc. Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Option and Performance
Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended, effective as of March 2, 2004, as follows. 
  
 1. The last sentence of Section 2.2 of the Plan, which reads as follows: 
  
 “Shares of Common Stock (i) withheld by the Company in payment of the exercise price of options or taxes relating to awards, or (ii) surrendered to
the Company in payment of the exercise price of options or taxes relating to awards, will be available for awards under the Plan.” 
  
 shall expire as of June 3, 2007, which is the day prior to the tenth anniversary of the date that the Plan was last approved by the stockholders of the Company, and shall
thereafter be replaced with the following sentence: 
  
 “Shares of Common Stock withheld by the Company in payment of the exercise price of options or in payment of taxes relating to awards (other than Restricted Shares or other awards in which shares of Common Stock have already been
issued to the participant) will be available for subsequent awards under the Plan.” 
  
 2. The following proviso shall be added at the end of the penultimate sentence of Section 2.2 of the Plan: 
  
 “provided, however, that Restricted Shares or other awards in which shares of Common Stock have already been issued and which are subsequently
converted to a cash settlement on or after June 3, 2007 shall not be available for subsequent awards under the Plan.” 
  
 3. Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect as prior to this Amendment. 
  
 The Company has caused this Amendment to be executed as of the day and year first above
written.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION





<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Industrial  Minerals,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30, 2005 as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report") I,
Larry Van Tol, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
USC section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 9, 2005


/s/Larry Van Tol
------------------------------------------------------------------
Larry Van Tol, Chief Executive Officer and President


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAY ELLIS POTTER,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

CROSS COUNTRY MORTGAGE, INC.; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 19

- 55597

D.C. No

. 2:19

- cv

- 01641

- FMO

- JC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California Fernando M. Olguin, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 6, 2020 * *

Before: BERZON, N.R. SMITH, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Jay Ellis Potter appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

for improper venue his action alleging federal and state law claims arising out of

the foreclosure and sale of his property in Tennessee

. We review de novo.

Immigra nt Assistance Project of the L.A. Cty. Fed’n of Labor (AFL

- CIO) v. INS

,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAY 13 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 55597

306 F.3d 842, 868 (9th Cir. 2002) . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Potter’s action for improper venue

because Potter failed to establish that any defendant resides in the Central District

of California or that a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to his

claims occurred there

. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(1), (2) (describing where a civil

action ma y be brought) ; s e e also 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) (“ A district court of a district

in which is filed a case laying venue in the wrong division or district shall dismiss,

or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in

wh ich it could have been brought

. ”).

We reject as meritless Potter’s contention s regarding leave to amend , and

defendant Cross Country Mortgage, Inc.’s alleged tacit consent to venue in the

Central District of California.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

All pending motions and requests are denied.

AFFIRMED.