alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 04-15-00304-CR

IN THE 

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

OF TEXAS

AT SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

BRIAN KEITH GORHAM, 

Appellant

VS.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AS LEAD COUNSEL 

FOR APPELLANT

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

On May 14, 2015, the Honorable Mary Roman, Judge Presiding, 175th

Judicial District of Texas, appointed the Bexar County Public Defender’s Office to 

represent the Appellant in the direct appeal in the above styled and numbered 

cause. Pursuant to Rule 6.1(c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, Richard 

B. Dulany, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, hereby notifies the Court that he enters 

his appearance as lead counsel for the Appellant on behalf of the Bexar County 

Public Defender’s Office.

 Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/ Richard B. Dulany, Jr.

ACCEPTED

04-15-00304-CR

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

5/21/2015 1:59:02 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 5/21/2015 1:59:02 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
2

____________________________________

RICHARD B. DULANY, JR.

Assistant Public Defender

Bexar County Public Defender’s Office

101 W. Nueva, Suite 310

San Antonio, Texas 78205

(210) 335-0701

FAX (210) 335-0707

richard.dulany@bexar.org

Texas Bar No. 06196400

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND COMPLIANCE

I HEREBY CERTIFIY that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

notice has been served electronically on the Bexar County District Attorney’s 

Office, Appellate Division, Paul Elizondo Tower, 101 W. Nueva St., Suite 710, San 

Antonio, Texas 78205, on May 21, 2015. The word count is 224.

/s/ Richard B. Dulany, Jr.

____________________________________

RICHARD B. DULANY, JR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,764,465
<SECURITIES>                                 1,274,734
<RECEIVABLES>                               31,844,052
<ALLOWANCES>                                   120,102
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,724,327
<PP&E>                                      34,703,657
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,231,639
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              73,906,245
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,497,192
<BONDS>                                     53,726,746
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       361,503
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,489,331
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                73,906,245
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,412,765
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,687,659
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,981,685
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,773,247
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,773,247
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,773,247
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.77
        

</TABLE>
#### Alexander McKeown, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn City Railroad Company, Appellant.

Order granting new trial affirmed, with costs.

Opinion by Pratt, J.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 08654

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name Description

x 08654\08654_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

08654\08654_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

08654\08654_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 08654\08654_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08654\08654_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08654\08654_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08654\08654_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08654\08654_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

08654\Certification Statement Plant ID 08654.pdf Plant certification statement

08654\Supplemental Documents\08654_A5-2. MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08654\Supplemental Documents\08654_A5-3. WB-1, 2, 3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08654\Supplemental Documents\08654_C2-31. Unit IDs 1, 2, 4.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08654\Supplemental Documents\08654_C3-36. Unit IDs 1, 2, 4.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Exhibit 32




SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION




Each of the undersigned, S.W. Yong, President and Chief Executive Officer of Trio-Tech International, a California corporation (the “Company”), and Victor H.M. Ting, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge (1) the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









/s/ S.W.Yong

Name: S. W. Yong

Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: September 28, 2016/s/ Victor H. M. Ting

Name: Victor H. M. Ting

Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: September 28, 2016










A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.04 MB)
 
 Task Force Spartan U.S. Army AFCENT USARCENT CENTCOM 75th FAB 1-14 FAR
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### Gibbons L Kelty and others, Appellants, v. Zachariah E. Simmons, Respondent.

Order modified. See opinion of

Brady, J.
EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                    ------------

                              ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Spire Corporation:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form
S-8 of Spire Corporation of our report dated March 16, 2001, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Spire Corporation and subsidiary as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2000, which report appears in the December 31, 2000
annual report on Form 10-KSB of Spire Corporation.


KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
30 March 2001
Docket: HHS-OS-2010-0015 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Comment On: HHS-OS-2010-0015-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: HHS-OS-2010-0015-0003 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: vendre maison 

Organization: dopimmo 

General Comment 

Thanks you for this post, i think ido this! great! 

vendre maison 

vendre maison

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: August 12, 2010 

Received: June 23, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: July 23, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b0915e 

Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/ContentViewer?objectId=0900006480b09... 8/12/2010
#### CARLO J. AIMONE, PLAINTIFF, v. HARRY BRENNER AND ESTHER BRENNER, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS.

Decided December 8, 1933.

For the plaintiff, *J. Raymond Tiffany.*

For the defendants, *Garey & Lane.*

Ackerson, S. C. C.

This motion is to strike out the answer of the defendants interposed in an action upon two bonds made by them to the plaintiff’s assignor and accompanying mortgages which have been foreclosed resulting in a deficiency, to recover which this action is brought.

The sufficiency of the answer in question depends upon the constitutionality (so far as it affects the bonds in question) of chapter 82 *(Pamph. L.*1933), approved March 29th, 1933, which in effect permits the question of "fair market value” of the premises foreclosed to be raised in an action at law on the bond, for a deficiency resulting from the foreclosure sale, notwithstanding the order of the Court of Chancery confirming the sale.

Since the bonds in question were executed prior to the time when the above mentioned act took effect, this mótion is controlled by the recent decision of our Court of Errors and Appeals in the case of *Vanderbilt*v. *Brunton Piano Co. et al.,*111 *N. J. L.*596, which held that the above mentioned act, in so far as it permits the question of "fair market value” of the mortgaged premises to be raised in an action on the accompanying contracts are concerned.

The plaintiff’s motion must, therefore, be granted and the defendants’ answer will be stricken out as sham in part and frivolous in part, and an order may be presented in accordance with the conclusion thus reached.
Exhibit 32.1

         Certification of Chief Executive Officer of FirstBank NW Corp.
  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of FirstBank
NW Corp. ("the Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report"), I,
Clyde E. Conklin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     o    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and


     o    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the Company's financial condition and results of
          operations.




/s/ CLYDE E. CONKLIN
--------------------------
Clyde E. Conklin,
President and
Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  August 8, 2006

                                                                              31
## EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March
31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) by
FCCC, Inc. (the Registrant), I, Bernard Zimmerman, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:

|1. |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 
| | 
| | 

| | Name: Bernard Zimmerman                     
| | --------------------------------------------
| | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: May 4, 2006

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VICKY NIKHIL PATHAK,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 22

- 1893

Agency No.

A046

- 546

- 630

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 12, 2023 **

Before: WALLACE, LEE, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Vicky Nikhil Pathak , a native and citizen of India , petitions pro se for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for deferral of removal

under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 18 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 22

- 1893

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review factual findings for substantial evidence. Conde

Quevedo v. Barr , 947 F.3d 1238, 1241 (9th Cir. 2020). We review questions of

law de novo. Id

. We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the denial of deferral of removal under CAT

because petitioner failed to show it is more likely than not he will be tortured by or

with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to India

. See Aden

v. Holder , 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009) ; Zheng v. Holder , 644 F.3d 829,

835

- 36 (9th Cir. 2011) (possibility of torture too speculative).

The record does not support Pathak’s contentions that the IJ violated due

process by demonstrating bias, failing to consider all evidence and claims, or

otherwise erring in the analysis, or that the BIA applied the wrong standard of

review. See Padilla

-

Martinez v. Holder , 770 F.3d 825, 830 (9th Cir. 2014) (“To

prevail on a due

- process claim, a petitioner must demonstrate both a violation of

rights and prejudice.”) ; see also Najmabadi v. Holder , 597 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir.

2010) (the BIA adequately considered evidence and sufficiently announced its

decision)

.

Because Pathak timely filed his reply brief, t he motion to accept late filing

(Docket Entry No. 35) is denied as unnecessary

.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### Thomas Cockerill v. Peter Loonan.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Brady, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 33 Agreed to House (ATH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 33

 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2001

Mr. Frost submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, 
elected the following standing committees of the House of 
Representatives:
    Committee on Appropriations: Mr. Fattah of Pennsylvania, Mr. 
Rothman of New Jersey.
    Committee on Agriculture: Mr. Larsen of Washington, Mr. Ross of 
Arkansas, Mr. Acevedo-Vila of Puerto Rico.
    Committee on the Budget: Mrs. McCarthy of New York, Mr. Moore of 
Kansas, Mr. Capuano of Massachusetts, Mr. Honda of California.
    Committee on Education and the Workforce: To rank after Mr. Holt of 
New Jersey, Ms. Solis of California, Mrs. Davis of California, Ms. 
McCollum of Minnesota.
    Committee on Energy and Commerce: Mr. Doyle of Pennsylvania, Mr. 
John of Louisiana, Ms. Harman of California.
    Committee on Financial Services: Mr. Ford of Tennessee, Mr. 
Hinojosa of Texas, Mr. Lucas of Kentucky, Mr. Shows of Mississippi, Mr. 
Crowley of New York, Mr. Clay of Missouri, Mr. Israel of New York, Mr. 
Ross of Arkansas.
    Committee on Government Reform: Mr. Clay of Missouri.
    Committee on International Relations: Mr. Blumenauer of Oregon, Ms. 
Berkley of Nevada, Mrs. Napolitano of California, Mr. Schiff of 
California.
    Committee on the Judiciary: Mr. Schiff of California.
    Committee on Resources: Mr. Rahall of West Virginia, Mr. Markey of 
Massachusetts, Mr. Kildee of Michigan, Mr. DeFazio of Oregon, Mr. 
Faleomavaega of American Samoa, Mr. Abercrombie of Hawaii, Mr. Ortiz of 
Texas, Mr. Pallone of New Jersey, Mr. Dooley of California, Mr. 
Underwood of Guam, Mr. Smith of Washington, Mrs. Christensen of the 
Virgin Islands, Mr. Kind of Wisconsin, Mr. Inslee of Washington, Mrs. 
Napolitano of California, Mr. Udall of New Mexico, Mr. Udall of 
Colorado, Mr. Holt of New Jersey, Mr. McGovern of Massachusetts, Mr. 
Acevedo-Vila of Puerto Rico, Ms. Solis of California, Mr. Carson of 
Oklahoma, Ms. McCollum of Minnesota.
    Committee on Science: Mr. Matheson of Utah, Mr. Israel of New York.
    Committee on Small Business: Mr. Langevin of Rhode Island.
                                 <all>
```
#### Daniel W. Way and others, Respondents, v. Thomas T. Kavanaugh and others Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
U.S. Navy Analysis Confirms Iranian Link to Drone Attack
 
  By U.S. Naval Forces Central Command Public Affairs
  A U.S. Navy lab in Bahrain has confirmed Iran’s connection to a Nov. 15 aerial drone attack on a Liberian-flagged commercial tanker transiting international waters in the Middle East.
Two U.S. Navy explosive ordnance technicians boarded M/T Pacific Zircon, Nov. 16, to assess the damage and collect unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) debris fragments for forensic analysis. During a two-hour survey and evidence collection process, the technicians also obtained explosive residue samples for lab testing.
U.S. 5th Fleet transported the gathered evidence to a lab at its Bahrain headquarters where technicians confirmed Iran’s connection to the attack. The aerial drone that hit the commercial tanker was identified as a Shahed-136 UAV, fitting a historical pattern of Iran’s increasing use of a lethal capability directly or through its proxies across the Middle East. Iran has supplied aerial drone technology to the Houthis in Yemen used in attacks against Saud Arabia and the United Arab Emirates earlier this year.
Additionally, the Shahed-136 platform is the same aerial drone Iran has supplied to Russia for use against Ukraine.
On Nov. 15, the explosive-laden aerial drone attacked Pacific Zircon at approximately 7:30 p.m. in the Northern Arabian Sea, tearing a 30-inch-wide hole into the back of the ship while subsequently penetrating and damaging internal compartments. The UAV’s explosive impact also damaged a shipboard boiler, potable water tank and life raft.
“The Iranian attack on a commercial tanker transiting international waters was deliberate, flagrant and dangerous, endangering the lives of the ship’s crew and destabilizing maritime security in the Middle East,” said Vice Adm. Brad Cooper, commander of U.S. Naval Forces Central Command, U.S. 5th Fleet and Combined Maritime Forces. Cooper also serves as the multinational task force commander for the International Maritime Security Construct, a 10-member naval coalition whose forces provide maritime security near the Strait of Hormuz and Bab al-Mandeb.
Upon learning of the attack, the British Royal Navy dispatched frigate HMS Lancaster (F229) to the scene. U.S. 5th Fleet also directed guided-missile destroyer USS The Sullivans (DDG 68), patrol coastal ship USS Chinook (PC 9) and a P-8 Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft to assist and assess the situation.
----

Lists to be used for determining the composition of the formations of the Court

(2004/C 156/04)

At its meeting on 14 May 2004, the Court drew up the list referred to in Article 11b(2) of the Rules of Procedure for the purpose of determining the composition of the Grand Chamber, as follows:

At its meeting on 14 May 2004, the Court drew up the lists referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 11c(2) of the Rules of Procedure for the purpose of determining the composition of the Chambers of five Judges, as follows:

For the First Chamber:

Ms Colneric

Mr Levits

Mr Cunha Rodrigues

Mr Ilešič

Mr Lenaerts

Mr Juhász

Mr Schiemann

For the Second Chamber:

Mr Gulmann

Mr Klučka

Mr Schintgen

Mr Arestis

Ms Silva de Lapuerta

Mr Kūris

Mr Makarczyk

For the Third Chamber:

Mr La Pergola

Mr Lõhmus

Mr Puissochet

Mr Malenovský

Ms Macken

Mr Borg-Barthet

Mr von Bahr

At its meeting on 14 May 2004, the Court drew up the lists referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 11c(2) of the Rules of Procedure for the purpose of determining the composition of the Chambers of three Judges, as follows:

For the Fourth Chamber:

Ms Colneric

Mr Lenaerts

Mr Schiemann

Mr Juhász

Mr Ilešič

Mr Levits

For the Fifth Chamber:

Mr Schintgen

Ms Silva de Lapuerta

Mr Makarczyk

Mr Kūris

Mr Arestis

Mr Klučka

For the Sixth Chamber:

Mr La Pergola

Ms Macken

Mr von Bahr

Mr Borg-Barthet

Mr Malenovský

Mr Lõhmus

----