alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Jamie Boyer

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 4:45:58 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Jamie Boyer

1006 Sprucewood Dr

Greenville, Mi 48838
Docket: EBSA-2010-0007 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in 

Retirement Plans 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0007-0001 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options 

Document: EBSA-2010-0007-DRAFT-0023 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: Pete Holahan 

Address: 

2601 E. Community Drive 

Jupiter, FL, 33458 

Email: pholahan@bellsouth.net 

General Comment 

Re: RIN 1210-AB33 

Our country has been driven to fiscal destruction by the poor monetary policies of the Federal 

government and now some suggest that the best way out is to federalize the populations IRA's. I 

sense another Boston Tea Party on the horizon. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: February 17, 2010 

Received: February 05, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80a8e6b6 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 2/17/2010
#### Andrew De Wolf, Respondent, v. John Waterson, Sole Trustee, etc., Appellant.

Motion for reargument denied.
From: Jim Ruddell [mailto:jamestruddell@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:14 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN-1210-AB32

Mr. Perez 

I applaud your efforts to clarify the duties of individuals who provide financial advice to noninstitutional investors. For 30 years, I was not aware that my "financial advisor" has no fiduciary 

duty to me. As a minimum, you can help by requiring up front and clear disclosures of those 

who represent themselves as providing financial advice. Ideally the disclosure would be, "I 

do (or do not) have a duty to put your interests ahead of my own." 

Thank you fighting the good fight! 

Jim Ruddell

Lovettsville, VA 

540-882-3944
---

EXHIBIT 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
  ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the inclusion by reference of our report,
  dated January 31, 2004, except as to Note 17 which is at February 3, 2005, on
  the consolidated balance sheet of Silverado Gold Mines Ltd. as at November 30,
  2003, and the consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity,
  and cash flows for the year then ended in the Form S-8 Registration Statements
  of Silverado Gold Mines Ltd. filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
  Commission on August 22, 2003 and January 14, 2004.



|Vancouver, Canada | “MORGAN & COMPANY”   
|----------------- | ---------------------
|                  |                      
|May 25, 2005      | Chartered Accountants





|Tel: (604) 687-5841 |                                     | P.O. Box 10007 Pacific Centre
|------------------- | ----------------------------------- | -----------------------------
|Fax: (604) 687-0075 | Sute 1488 - 700 West Georgia Street
|www.morgan-cas.com  | Vancouver, B.C. V7Y 1A1            

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 165 (Monday, August 28, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 58630]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18623]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, August 31, 2023.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website 
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has 
certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the 
following topics:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
Resolution of litigation claims; and
Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of 
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information; please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: August 24, 2023.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-18623 Filed 8-24-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
8 i REc- C41 a-/

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION

Page 1 of 1

PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS
BRANCH As of: September 08, 2010

PUBLIC Status: Posted

Posted: September 08, 2010

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2030

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0830
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Leon Kurasowicz
Address:
341 Worthington Street
Marco Island, FL,
Submitter's Representative: ??7?
Organization: None

General Comment

See attached file(s)

Attachments

IRS-2010-0010-0830.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P...

9/8/2010


August 14, 2010

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO—9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to
Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

There are currently to many regulatory and insurance plan obstacles and limitations on
consumers to avail themselves of complete chiropractic care.

Leon Kurasowicz
341 Worthington Street
Marco Island, FL 34145
# CJTF-OIR Strike Summary March 24 – April 6, 2019

/ Published April 10, 2019

April 10, 2019Release # 20190410-01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**SOUTHWEST ASIA –**Combined Joint Task Force – Operation Inherent Resolve and its partners continue to target and pursue the enduring defeat of Daesh.

CJTF-OIR and partner forces have liberated nearly 110,000 square kilometers (42,471 square miles) from Daesh; as a result, 7.7 million people no longer live under Daesh oppression.

CJTF-OIR remains committed to the enduring defeat of Daesh to improve conditions for peace and stability in the region, and to protect all our homelands from Daesh's terrorist threat.

Strike Summary

Between March 24 - April 6, 2019, CJTF-OIR conducted 52 strikes consisting of 98 engagements against Daesh targets in Syria and Iraq.

In Syria, CJTF-OIR conducted 29 strikes consisting of 53 engagements, engaged 28 Daesh tactical units, and destroyed 72 vehicles, 17 fighting positions, 15 supply routes, and three vehicle borne improvised explosive devices.

In Iraq, CJTF-OIR conducted 23 strikes consisting of 45 engagements, engaged three Daesh tactical units, and destroyed seven tunnels, four supply routes, two buildings, two caves, one command and control center, and one compound.

Between March 24 - April 6, 2019, CJTF-OIR detected 67 strikes from other actors that crossed the Euphrates River Valley. CJTF-OIR is committed to avoiding and in every case minimizing civilian casualties; CJTF-OIR calls on all other actors in the area to observe the same precautions.

This Coalition strike release contains all strikes conducted by fighter, attack, bomber, rotary-wing, or remotely piloted aircraft, rocket propelled artillery and ground-based tactical artillery.

A strike, as defined in the Coalition release, refers to one or more kinetic engagements that occur in roughly the same geographic location to produce a single, sometimes cumulative effect in that location. For example, a single aircraft delivering a single weapon against a lone Daesh vehicle is one strike, but so is multiple aircraft delivering dozens of weapons against a group of Daesh-held buildings and weapon systems in a compound, having the cumulative effect of making that facility harder or impossible to use. Strike assessments are based on initial reports and may be refined.

CJTF-OIR does not report the number or type of aircraft employed in a strike, the number of munitions dropped in each strike, or the number of individual munition impact points against a target. The information used to compile the daily strike releases is based on 'Z' or Greenwich Mean Time.

#DefeatDaesh
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 438 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 438

  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that improving 
 men's health through fitness and the reduction of obesity should be a 
                               priority.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 6, 2002

 Mr. Toomey submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that improving 
 men's health through fitness and the reduction of obesity should be a 
                               priority.

Whereas the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service has identified obesity 
        as a major health problem;
Whereas 61 percent of adults in the United States are considered overweight or 
        obese, as indicated by a body mass index (the most reliable measure) of 
        25 or greater;
Whereas 300,000 deaths each year in the United States are associated with being 
        overweight or obese;
Whereas the economic cost of obesity in the United States was about $177 billion 
        in 2000;
Whereas being overweight or obese puts people at a greater risk of heart 
        disease, certain types of cancer, type 2 diabetes, stroke, arthritis, 
        breathing problems, and depression;
Whereas men who are overweight are 50 percent more likely to have erectile 
        dysfunction and men who are obese are 200 percent more likely to have 
        erectile dysfunction;
Whereas fewer than a third of American adults engage in the recommended level of 
        physical activity, which is 30 minutes, 3 to 4 times a week; and
Whereas the number of overweight and obese children has nearly tripled in the 
        past two decades: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes that being overweight or obese is a major 
        health concern in the United States;
            (2) commends and supports the work of all organizations 
        that are taking steps to combat this health problem;
            (3) urges all governmental, State, and private 
        organizations to do everything in their power to promote a 
        healthy lifestyle; and
            (4) pledges to take proactive steps to intensify its 
        efforts to combat this health problem.
                                 <all>
```
#### Quentin McAdam and others, Respondents, v. Charles F. Lovatt, Appellant.

Order reversed,with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Docket: HHS-OS-2010-0015 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Comment On: HHS-OS-2010-0015-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: HHS-OS-2010-0015-0002 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: Mary Farrell 

General Comment 

The method of communicating this change to subscribers should be by more than one means, i.e. 

personal e-mail as well as via internal communication channels.

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: August 12, 2010 

Received: June 19, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: July 23, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b061d0 

Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/ContentViewer?objectId=0900006480b06... 8/12/2010
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 10, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00240

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.L.L. III, ET AL., CHILDREN,

From the 408th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016PA02373

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant’s Third Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief is hereby

GRANTED. Time is extended to August 13, 2018.

_________________________________ Maria lyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 10th day of August, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
#### GEORGE FRANCIS BARLOW, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. GEORGE E. STERR, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Submitted January 27, 1933

Decided June 21, 1933.

*454Before Justices Bodine and Donges.

For the defendant-appellant, *Mark Townsend, Jr.*

For the plaintiff-appellee, *Turner & Stalter (Frank G. Turner).*

Pee Curiam.

The plaintiff was employed at a service station of the Standard Oil Company. The defendant desired to have his ear serviced. To accomplish this purpose, he was directed to drive on the usual type of lift. Plaintiff, directing the defendant, was standing behind the lift in order to see that all four wheels were in proper position. The defendant, when the car was in front of the lift, was told to drive slowly. When the front wheels were two feet from the chucks designed to hold the car in place he was requested to hold the car. Instead he applied the power and the car, with terrific speed, jumped the chucks injuring the plaintiff, who tried and failed to jump to a point of safety.

It would have been improper either to have nonsuited the plaintiff, or to have directed a verdict in favor of the defendant. It was open to the jury to find that the defendant’s lack of care was the proximate cause of the injury. The issue of contributory negligence was properly submitted to the jury.

The court declined to give the following request: “If the plaintiff violated any rule of his employer, the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, which has been offered in evidence, as to the position he took when the defendant’s car entered upon the lift, and that violation contributed proximately to the happening of the accident, he is guilty of contributory negligence, and your verdict must be cno cause of action.’” The defendant was not prejudiced thereby. While some of the rules of the Standard Oil Company were read into the record without objection, such rules so far as we find, were not applicable. In fact, we think that the plaintiff did obey *455the injunction, “to stand at the rear of the lift to direct the customer.” The testimony indicates that the plaintiff stood in this very position, and further he testified that it was the only position where he could, with certainty, direct the customer so that the car could be properly placed. The jury could well find that his injuries were not due to the position he had taken, but because of the failure of the defendant to exercise that degree of care which he was under a duty to observe.

The court in the charge given instructed the jury to disregard any statements of law made by counsel and directed them that they must be governed by the law as stated by the court. By so doing any erroneous statement of law which may have been made by counsel was corrected. However, as we read the summation of plaintiff’s counsel, we do not think he transcended the proprieties in asserting what he apprehended might be the legal principles applicable to the case.

The judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES
OF ZYGO CORPORATION (DELAWARE)

Technical
Instrument Company (California)
100% owned by Registrant (effective as of August 8, 1996)

Syncotec Neue
Technologien und Instrumente GmbH (Germany)
100% owned by Technical Instrument Company (effective as of September 1, 1997)

NexStar
Corporation (Colorado)
100% owned by Registrant (effective as of September 12, 1996)

TechniStar
Corporation (Delaware)
25% owned by NexStar Corporation

Zygo
TeraOptix, Inc. (Delaware)
100% owned by Registrant (effective as of May 5, 2000)

Zygo KK
(Japan)
100% owned by Registrant (effective as of October 1, 1999)

Zygo PTE LTD
(Singapore)
100% owned by Registrant (effective as of January 1, 1998)

ZygoLamda Metrology
Instrument (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (China) 
66% owned by Zygo PTE LTD (effective as of April 3, 2008)

Zygo Germany,
GmbH (Germany)
100% owned by Registrant (effective as of December 1, 2006)

ZygoLOT GmbH
(Germany)
60% owned by Zygo Germany, GmbH (effective as of December 28, 2006)

Six Brookside
Drive (Connecticut)
100% owned by Registrant (effective as of January 9, 1998)

ZYGO Canada
Inc. (Canada)
100% owned by Registrant (effective as of February 22, 2008)

Zygo Singapore
Inspection Systems PTE. LTD. (Singapore)
100% owned by ZYGO Canada Inc. (effective as of February 28, 2008)

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1997 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,588
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,471
<ALLOWANCES>                                       167
<INVENTORY>                                      8,459
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,941
<PP&E>                                           1,452
<DEPRECIATION>                                     482
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,762
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,585
<BONDS>                                          5,160
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,945
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,762
<SALES>                                         12,918
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,918
<CGS>                                            5,923
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,923
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,915
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 426
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,346)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (484)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (862)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   2,470
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,608
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .32<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32<F1>
<FN>
<F1>WE HAVE CALCULATED EARNINGS PER SHARE AMOUNTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAS 128
"EARNINGS PER SHARE".  WE HAVE ENTERED BASIC AND DILUTED AMOUNTS IN PLACE OF
PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>



</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                   Exhibit 24

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

                        COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
             Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended
                               December 31, 1999


The  undersigned   directors  of  COLUMBUS  SOUTHERN  POWER  COMPANY,   an  Ohio
corporation  (the "Company"),  do hereby  constitute and appoint E. LINN DRAPER,
JR.,   ARMANDO  A.  PENA  and  HENRY  W.   FAYNE,   and  each  of  them,   their
attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  to execute for them, and in their names,  and in
any and all of their capacities,  the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K,
pursuant to Section 13 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1999, and any and all  amendments  thereto,  and to file
the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith,
with   the   Securities   and   Exchange   Commission,    granting   unto   said
attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  and each of them, full power and authority to do
and perform  every act and thing  required or necessary to be done,  as fully to
all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person,  hereby
ratifying and confirming all that said  attorneys-in-fact  and agents, or any of
them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

      IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned  have signed these presents this 2nd
day of March, 2000.



/s/ E. Linn Draper, Jr.             /s/ Armando A. Pena
E. Linn Draper, Jr.                 Armando A. Pena


/s/ Henry W. Fayne                  /s/ J. H. Vipperman
Henry W. Fayne                      J. H. Vipperman


/s/ Wm. J. Lhota
Wm. J. Lhota