alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1039

For the relief of the State of Hawaii.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 14, 2001

Mr. INOUYE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

For the relief of the State of Hawaii.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RELIEF FROM STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR

4 REFUND OR CREDIT.

5 If refund or credit of any overpayment of tax result6 ing from the payment of taxes under section 4041, 4081,

7 or 4091 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 on fuel

8 purchased by the State of Hawaii during calendar years

9 1992 and 1993 is prevented at any time before the close

10 of the 18-month period beginning on the date of the enact11 ment of this Act by the operation of any law or rule of

12 law, refund or credit of such overpayment may, neverthe-
2

•S 1039 IS

1 less, be made or allowed if claim therefor is filed before

2 the close of such 18-month period.

Æ
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1144

AN ACT

To amend title III of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless

Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11331 et seq.) to reauthorize

the Federal Emergency Management Food and Shelter

Program, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1144 ES

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

2 Section 322 of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless

3 Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11352) is amended to read as

4 follows:

5 ‘‘SEC. 322. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

6 ‘‘There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out

7 this title $150,000,000 for fiscal year 2002, $160,000,000

8 for fiscal year 2003, and $170,000,000 for fiscal year

9 2004.’’.

10 SEC. 2. NAME CHANGE TO NOMINATING ORGANIZATION.

11 Section 301(b) of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless

12 Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11331(b)) is amended by strik13 ing paragraph (5) and inserting the following:

14 ‘‘(5) United Jewish Communities.’’.

15 SEC. 3. PARTICIPATION OF HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS ON

16 LOCAL BOARDS.

17 Section 316(a) of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless

18 Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11346(a)) is amended by strik19 ing paragraph (6) and inserting the following:

20 ‘‘(6) guidelines requiring each local board to in21 clude in their membership not less than 1 homeless

22 individual, former homeless individual, homeless ad23 vocate, or recipient of food or shelter services, except

24 that such guidelines may waive such requirement for

25 any board unable to meet such requirement if the

26 board otherwise consults with homeless individuals,
3

S 1144 ES

1 former homeless individuals, homeless advocates, or

2 recipients of food or shelter services.’’.

Passed the Senate August 3, 2001.

Attest:

Secretary.

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1144

AN ACT

To amend title III of the Stewart B. McKinney

Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11331 etseq.) to reauthorize the Federal Emergency Management Food and Shelter Program, and forother purposes.
Docket: EBSA-2010-0007 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in 

Retirement Plans 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0007-0001 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options 

Document: EBSA-2010-0007-DRAFT-0015 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Address: 

Kendall Park, NJ, 

General Comment 

I would guess that the financial services, banking and insurance industries will be strong 

supporters of this proposal since it will be a windfall for them. However, it is not in the best 

interests of the American worker or the American taxpayer. One could argue the details back and 

forth forever, but the bottom line is that with freedom comes responsibility. This includes the 

responsibility to manage your own money and make your own decisions, without the government 

pushing people into wrong decisions. What happens in Credit Crunch II? The government will be 

"obligated" to nationalize all of these annuities or will have to just provide more bailouts to 

protect the annuities. Annuities are already available for those who wish to go that route. It is not 

the Federal government's job to push people into annuities. This is just a bad idea. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: February 17, 2010 

Received: February 04, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80a8d7d0 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 2/17/2010
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (6.05 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
FIRST COURT OF APPEALS 

INFORMATION SHEET BY COURT REPORTERS 

You are expected to file the reporter’s record by the original due date. See Tex. R. App. P.35. If 

a reporter determines that the due date may not be met, please advise the Clerk of the Court of 

Appeals immediately in writing, stating the reason and the due date by which the record will be 

filed. Generally speaking, for good cause shown, the Court will grant no more than two 

extensions from the original record due date, each extension not to exceed 30 days in regular 

appeals and 10 days in accelerated appeals for a total period not to exceed 60 days in regular 

appeals and 20 days in accelerated appeals. 

 

Appellate Case Number: Trial Court Case Number: 

(1) Is there a Reporter's Record? Y N

(2) Are you the only court reporter involved in this appeal? Y N

If not, please provide the names and addresses of all other court

reporters below.

(3) Has the appellant requested that the reporter’s record be prepared or 

has the trial court ordered that the record be prepared?

 Y N

(4) Please select from the following options:

 A. The appellant has paid for the record.

 B. The appellant has made arrangements to pay for the record

 C. The appellant is appealing as indigent.

 D. The appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the

 record and is not appealing as indigent.

(5) Extension (fill out if extension is required for any reason other than payment)

I was unable to file the record in this appeal by ________. I expect the record 

in this appeal to be approximately _______ pages. The record covers 

_______days of testimony. I believe that I can file the record by _________. I 

ask that the court grant an extension until that time for filing the record.

Additional Comments: ___________________________________________

Court Reporter's Signature, Full Address, Email Address and Telephone Number:

_______________________________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________________________________

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/29/2014 12:00:00 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
**EXHIBIT25.1**

 

**POWEROF ATTORNEY**

 

We,the undersigned directors and officers of PACCAR Financial Corp., a Washingtoncorporation, hereby severally constitute and appoint T. M. Henebry our true andlawful attorney-in-fact, with full power to him to sign for us, and in ournames in the capacities indicated below, a Form 10-K of this corporation forfiscal year 2003 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission underthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, together with any and allamendments to said Form 10-K, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures asthey may be signed by our said attorney-in-fact to said Form 10-K and any andall amendments thereto.

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF each of the undersigned has executed this power of attorney asof the 12th of March 2004.

 

 
| /s/  Timothy M. Henebry |          | President         | /s/  Kenneth R. Gangl |   | Vice  Chairman |
|-------------------------|---------------|-------------------|-----------------------|--------|----------------|
| Timothy  M. Henebry     | and  Director | Kenneth  R. Gangl | and  Director         |
|                    |          |              |                  |
|                    |          |              |                  |
|                    |          |              |                  |
| /s/  Thomas E. Plimpton |          | Director          |                  |   |
| Thomas  E. Plimpton     |          |              |                  |

 

----
Rockingham,

June, 1900.

#### Storer Post, No. 1, Grand Army of the Republic, *v.*Page & *a.*

Assumpsit, and not *mandamus,*is the proper remedy to enforce the payment of an appropriation made by a municipal corporation.

Petition, for a writ of mandamus, to compel the payment to the plaintiffs of an appropriation made by the city of Portsmouth “for decorating graves of soldiers and sailors.” Facts found.by the court. One half of the appropriation was paid to the General Gilman Marston Command of the Union Veterans’ Union, and one half was offered to -the plaintiffs, who claimed the whole under section 1, chapter 34, of the Laws of 1899. The petition was dismissed, subject to the plaintiffs’ exception.

*Samuel W. Emery,*for the plaintiffs.

*Calvin Page, pro se.*

Chase, J.

*Mandamus*is “ an extraordinary remedy granted only in cases where the usual modes of procedure and forms of remedy are powerless to afford relief.” *State*v. *Railroad,*62 N. H. 29, 34. This is not such a case. If the plaintiffs are entitled to the appropriation, they can recover it in an action of assumpsit against the city. *Hillsborough County*v. *Londonderry,*43 N. H. 451; *Jones*v. *Chester,*67 N. H. 191.

*Exception overruled.*

Young, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATIONS








I, Steven R. Staub, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of FirstEnergy Ohio PIRB Special Purpose Trust 2013 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by Ohio Edison Company, as servicer, and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, Ohio Edison Company, as servicer, has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.








In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank, National Association, as Certificate Trustee and Indenture Trustee.








Date: March 25, 2022





/s/ Steven R. StaubSteven R. StaubVice President and Treasurer (Senior Officer in Charge of Servicing Function) of Ohio Edison Company, as Servicer under the Phase-In-Recovery Property Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 20, 2013, between the Servicer and OE Funding LLC, as the Bond Issuer
**Exhibit 25.1**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

We,the undersigned directors and officers of PACCAR Financial Corp., a Washingtoncorporation, hereby severally constitute and appoint T. M. Henebry our true andlawful attorney-in-fact, with full power to him to sign for us, and in ournames in the capacities indicated below, a Form 10-K of this corporation forfiscal year 2006 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission underthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, together with any and allamendments to said Form 10-K, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures asthey may be signed by our said attorney-in-fact to said Form 10-K and any andall amendments thereto.

INWITNESS WHEREOF each of the undersigned has executed this power of attorney asof the 26th of February 2007.
| /s/ Timothy M. Henebry |   | President    |   | /s/ Kenneth R. Gangl |   | Vice Chairman |
|------------------------|--------|--------------|--------|----------------------|--------|---------------|
| Timothy M. Henebry     |   | and Director |   | Kenneth R. Gangl     |   | and Director  |
|                   |   |         |   |                 |   |          |
|                   |   |         |   |                 |   |          |
| /s/ Thomas E. Plimpton |   | Director     |   |                 |   |          |
| Thomas E. Plimpton     |   |         |   |                 |   |          |

 

1

----
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 21-14363

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TODD ENGLES, 

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 6:21-cr-00064-PGB-GJK-1

____________________

USCA11 Case: 21-14363 Date Filed: 07/28/2022 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 21-14363

Before ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, and GRANT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Michelle Yard, counsel for Todd Engles in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of 

the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is 

correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, and Engles’s convictions and sentences are 

AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 21-14363 Date Filed: 07/28/2022 Page: 2 of 2
From: Debbie [mailto:angeloct22@aol.com] 

Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 5:18 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 

Are you crazy???? Why would I want the US government anywhere near my 401K of which 

I contributed the maximum amount? The government has failed in every business in which it has 

stuck it's head: Social Security, Medicare, Head Start, and now the unwanted Health Care. 

 

This is my money to do as I please and not the government's. I will take it out and put it in my 

mattress before I will let the government have it. This is the most socialistic, idiotic idea I have 

heard of. Why don't you try fixing things before breaking others? The congress and senate do 

not have any investment in fixing social security or medicare because they are not using it. Their 

pensions should be done away with. No one else gets pensions of the same salary you have for 

life. Their insurance should be the same as anyone else. What makes them better than us? We're 

the ones paying the salaries and yet they live better than we do. Why should the vote themselves 

raises? The last I knew it was my employer that decided my raise. We are the employers and we 

should have a say. We're not getting 3% raises. My husband will be lucky to get 1% this year. I'm 

still unemployed after 8 months and after 17 years of employment. 

Start running the government as a business instead of just putting a inadequate band-aid on 

everything. 

 

Debbie Tallman 

California
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               41,121
<SECURITIES>                                          4,922
<RECEIVABLES>                                         2,936
<ALLOWANCES>                                            172
<INVENTORY>                                          25,971
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     78,347
<PP&E>                                               13,499
<DEPRECIATION>                                        4,018
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       93,346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                20,040
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                128
<OTHER-SE>                                           57,295
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         93,346
<SALES>                                             172,120
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    172,120
<CGS>                                               137,819
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       156,016
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      915
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      16,058
<INCOME-TAX>                                          1,476
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  14,582
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                         14,582
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           .91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .91
        

</TABLE>
1... This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 06-1750-CV, styled In the Interest of J.V., pending in the 25th

Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas, the Honorable Dwight E. Peschel presiding. However, the order

complained of was signed by the Honorable Karin Bonicoro, Associate Judge of the Child Protection Court of Central

Texas Court #4, 3rd Administrative Judicial Region. 

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00347-CV

IN RE Charles and Kimberly LUKANCICH

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 1, 2009

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On June 11, 2009, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for temporary

relief. The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and real party in interest’s

response and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the

petition for writ of mandamus and the motion for temporary relief are DENIED. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 52.8(a). 

 PER CURIAM