alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7131

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CALVIN LEE EVERETTE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,

District Judge. (5:01-cr-00068-BO)

Submitted: October 11, 2007 Decided: October 18, 2007

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin Lee Everette, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Lee Everette appeals the district court’s order

denying his “Motion for Rule 60(b)(3).” We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Everette, No. 5:01-cr-00068-BO (E.D.N.C. June 21, 2007). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10QSB
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         320,605
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  335,627
<ALLOWANCES>                                    39,698
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               967,176
<PP&E>                                       8,293,086
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,973,834
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,296,428
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,843,135
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        47,031
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,093,931)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,296,428
<SALES>                                        455,503
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               471,806
<CGS>                                          275,076
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  460,350
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,205
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             279,063
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (268,812)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (268,812)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (268,812)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)


</TABLE>
# International Militaries to Conduct Mine Countermeasures Exercise

/ Published July 17, 2012

**

MACDILL AFB, Fla. (July 17, 2012) —Militaries from more than 20 nations spanning four continents will come together September 16-27, 2012 to participate in a defensive exercise to preserve freedom of navigation in the international waterways of the Middle East and promote regional stability within the CENTCOM AOR.

U.S. Naval Forces Central Command (NAVCENT) and an international contingent of military planners completed the Main Planning Conference for the International Mine Countermeasures Exercise 2012, or IMCMEX 12, last week.  IMCMEX 12 will be an international symposium and afloat exercise of mine countermeasures, conducted in multiple locations in NAVCENT’s area of operations.

Exercises such as IMCMEX 12 enhance cooperation, mutual maritime capabilities and long-term regional stability and interoperability between the U.S. and its international partners while preparing the international community to address threats to freedom of navigation and international commerce.

“IMCMEX 12 demonstrates the international community’s ability to work together to ensure free and secure trade,” said Gen. James N. Mattis, Commander of the U.S. Central Command. “Of the approximately 40 bilateral and multilateral exercises we’ll conduct this year, this exercise also represents the extensive cooperation we enjoy with our international partners – both in and outside the region – with mutual economic and security interests. We’ll finish this exercise with even stronger relationships with our partners.”

 Terrorist attacks against the Motor Vessel (M/V) Limburg in 2002 and the M/V M. Star in 2010 underscore the exercise scenario, which focuses on a hypothetical threat from an extremist organization to mine the international strategic waterways of the Middle East, including the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aden, the Gulf of Oman, and the Persian Gulf, although exercise activities will not extend into the Strait of Hormuz.

Questions about the exercise may be directed to USCENTCOM Public Affairs at 813-529-0220 (email: mediadesk@centcom.mil), or USNAVCENT Public Affairs at 973-1785-4562 (email: navcentpao@me.navy.mil).
# 99064. Federal Program Assists Absentee Voters

```

By Staff Sgt. Alicia K. Borlik, USA
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON -- More than 2.8 million military personnel and 
family members have the right to vote. The DoD Federal Voting 
Assistance Program provides them tools and help to exercise this 
right regardless of where they are stationed.

In 1996, 64 percent of all service members cast absentee ballots 
under provisions of the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee 
Voting Act of 1986. At the same time, only 49 percent of the 
U.S. civilian voter population voted.

Director Polly Brunelli said the DoD voting assistance program 
informs U.S. citizens worldwide of their right to vote and the 
avenues open to them. It provides information to voting 
assistance officers at each military installation and through 
its Web site at www.fvap.gov and newsletter, Voting Information 
News.

The Web site includes an online guide that lists absentee 
registration and voting procedures for all U.S. states and 
territories. It also offers training slides for military and 
civilian voting assistance officers. 

Brunelli said the DoD program is always looking for ways to 
increase voter turnout. Some 44 states and territories, she 
said, make absentee voting easier than ever by allowing voters 
to register by faxed Federal Post Card Application, to request 
and receive a ballot by fax, and to return their ballot by fax. 

Ballot faxing started in 1991 when thousands of service members 
were deployed for Desert Shield and Storm, Brunelli said. 
Electronic voting worked so well Congress made it permanent, she 
said. 

Electronic mail and online voting are natural next steps, and 
Brunelli is helping develop a pilot project for the year 2000 
presidential election. The plan will allow military personnel 
from South Carolina and six counties to vote by e-mail. The 
chosen six are Orange and Okaloosa counties, Fla.; Howard and 
Texas counties, Mo.; Dallas County, Texas; and Weber County, 
Utah.

An online system for absentee voting is in the early planning 
stage, Brunelli said.

The DoD voting program serves the following individuals:

O Members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast 
Guard who, because of active duty, are absent from their legal 
voting residence.

O Merchant Mariners.

O Eligible family members of all the above who, because of their 
sponsor's active duty or service, are absent from their legal 
voting residence.

O Members of the Commissioned Corps of the Public Health Service 
and Commissioned Corps of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration who, by cause of active duty, are absent from 
their legal voting residence.

O U.S. citizens, military or civilian, residing overseas.

For help and more information, see your unit or installation 
voting assistance officer, visit the assistance program's Web 
site, or contact program staff by calling 1-800-438-VOTE toll 
free or sending an e-mail to [email protected].

##END##
```
<PAGE>


                                                           MORGAN
                                                           & COMPANY
                                                           CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS


February  28,  2003

SILVERADO  GOLD  MINES  LTD.
Suite  505,  1111  West  Georgia  Street
Vancouver,  British  Columbia
Canada  V6E  4M3

Attention:  Mr.  Garry  L.  Anselmo,  President

Re:     SILVERADO  GOLD  MINES  LTD.
     -  Registration  Statement  on  Form  S-8

Ladies  and  Gentlemen:

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We  hereby consent to the inclusion by reference of our report dated January 31,
2003  on  the  consolidated  balance  sheets  of  Silverado Gold Mines Ltd. (the
"Company")  as  at November 30, 2002 and 2001 and the consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity (deficiency) and cash flows for the years ended
November  30,  2002  and  2001 in the Company's Form S-8 registration statements
filed  with  the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on February 1,
2002  and  August  27,  2002.


Very  truly  yours,


/s/ Morgan & Company
MORGAN  &  COMPANY
Chartered  Accountants



Tel: (604) 687-5841        MEMBER OF               P.O. Box 10007 Pacific Centre
Fax: (604) 687-0075           ACPA          Suite 1488 - 700 West Georgia Street
www.morgan-cas.com        INTERNATIONAL                  Vancouver, B.C. V7Y 1A1
---

---

Exhibit 23.3

CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement on Forms S-8, (File No. 333-61895 and File No.
333-55970) and Forms S-3,( File No. 333-140968 , File No. 333-140969 and , File No.
333-140974) of our report dated March 5, 2007 relating to the financial statements of
Carmel Container Systems Ltd.s 2006 annual report, which appears in this Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007, of Ampal  American Israel Corporation.

Kost
Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
Member of Ernst &
Young Global

Haifa ,IsraelMarch 3,
2009



---

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7229

SYLVESTER LEE PANNELL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District

Judge. (7:06-cv-00600-sgw)

Submitted: March 25, 2008 Decided: March 27, 2008

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sylvester Lee Pannell, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Sylvester Lee Pannell seeks to appeal the district

court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. We

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

In civil cases in which the United States is not a party,

parties have thirty days after the entry of the district court’s

final judgment or order to file a notice of appeal. See Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). A district court may extend the time to file

a notice of appeal if a party moves for an extension within thirty

days after expiration of the original appeal period and the party

has shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension.

See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A); Washington v. Bumgarner, 882 F.2d

899, 900-01 (4th Cir. 1989). Moreover, a district court may reopen

the time to file an appeal if it finds: (i) the moving party did

not receive notice of the entry of judgment within twenty-one days

of entry; (ii) the motion to reopen is filed within 180 days after

the judgment is entered or within seven days after the movant

receives notice of entry, whichever is earlier; and (iii) no party

would be prejudiced. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The time period

within which to file a notice of appeal is “‘mandatory and

jurisdictional.’” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S. 257,

264 (1978). 

The district court’s order dismissing Pannell’s § 2254

petition was entered on April 3, 2007. Pannell therefore had until
- 3 -

May 3, 2007 to file his notice of appeal. Pannell’s notice of

appeal was not filed until August 16, 2007. Although Pannell’s

notice of appeal asks for another opportunity to appeal his case,

Pannell did not timely move for an extension of time or for a

reopening of the time to file a notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App.

P. 4(a). Accordingly, we dismiss his appeal for lack of

jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decision process.

DISMISSED
Joe Martens

Commissioner 

### New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

Division of Environmental Remediation

Office of the Director

, 12th Floor

625 Broadway, Albany, New York 12233

- 7011

Phone: ( 518 ) 402

- 9706 • Fax: ( 518 ) 402

- 9020

Website: www.dec.ny.gov

SENT VIA EMAIL ONLY August 29, 2013

Mr. Walter Mugdan ( mugdan.walter@epa.gov )

Director

Emergency & Remedial Response Division

United States Environmental Protection Agency

290 Broadway, 19th Fl oor , E38

New York, New York 10007

- 1866

R e : Proposed Deletion from the National Priority List

Ludlow Sand and Gravel, Site No. 633014

Town of Paris, Oneida County

Dear Mr. Mugdan:

The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation ( DEC ) has received the

United States Environment al Protection Agency’s ( EPA) Notice of Intent to Delete the Ludlow

Sand and Gravel Site (site), EPA ID No. NYD013468939

, DEC Site No. 633014, from the

National Priorities List (NPL). During this deletion process, in accordance with Section

300.425(e) of th e National Contingency Plan, the EPA m ust, “consult with the state on proposed

deletions from the NPL.” Upon review of the site’s final construction and closeout

documentation, DEC finds that the remedies are performing as expected and are ef fective.

Further

, an Environmental Easement has been executed and f iled with the County Clerk.

The EPA Final Closeout Report documents that the remedial actions selected for the site,

documented in Record s of Decision for operable units one and two, were implemented by the

EPA and DEC in accordance with these decision documents.

Please be informed that this site will remain on the New York State Registry of Inactive

Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites as one that has bee n remediated and/or closed, but requires

continued site management (e.g., maintenance and monitoring). Wi th this understanding, DEC

concurs with the proposed deletion of the Ludlow Sand and Gravel Superfund site fr om the

National Priorities List.

If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Robert Cozzy at (518) 402

- 9 7 6 8

.

Sincerely,

Robert W. Schick

, P.E.

Director

Division of Environmental Remediation

ec: P

. Mannino

, EPA ( mannino.pietro@epa.gov )

T. Mongelli, EPA ( mongelli.thomas@epa.gov )

D. Garbarini, EPA ( Garbarini.Doug@epa.gov )

I

. Rodrigues

, EPA ( Rodrigues.Isabel@epa.gov )

K. Anders / G. Rys, DOH

M. Ryan / R . Cozzy , DEC

S. Edwards /K . Lewandowski / J. Brown / K. Sarnowicz , DEC
#### Ann E. Oakley, Appellant, v. Austin Pierce, Respondent.

Order appealed from reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements and the order of the county judge vacated. Held, that the affidavit on which the order was made did not show that the plaintiff was a non-resident of the State.
Rule Of Law Makes Impressive Gains At Justice Center
 By CJIATF-435  Public Affairs , Combined Joint Interagency Task Force 435
  CAMP PHOENIX, Afghanistan (December 4, 2012) – The Afghan criminal justice system continues to make impressive strides in implementing the rule of law and demonstrating its national sovereignty in the criminal justice system at the Justice Center in Parwan (JCIP). Established in June 2010, the JCIP exists to ensure fair and impartial justice for those defendants alleged of committing national security crimes in the Afghan criminal justice system.  At the JCIP, the Afghans are partnering with the Rule of Law Field Force- Afghanistan (ROLFF-A), a subordinate command under CJIATF-435. ROLLF-A’s mission is to provide essential field capabilities, liaison and security to partnered Afghan and coalition civil-military teams in order to build Afghan criminal justice capacity, increase access to dispute resolution services, fight corruption and promote the legitimacy of the Afghan government. Through this partnership, the JCIP has made tremendous strides in advancing the legitimacy and functionality of the role of law in Afghanistan.   During its first year, the JCIP completed just 45 cases. Thus far in 2012, 1135 criminal cases have been completed, as compared to only 436 in all of 2011. These include primary level, juvenile and appellate court cases. “These numbers depict a steady increase in the court’s ability to dispense fair and impartial Afghan justice, which serves as a demonstrable example of Afghan sovereignty,” said U.S. Army Brig. Gen. Ural D. Glanville, the ROLLF-A commander. “This is a total effort by our Afghan partners. Afghan judges, Afghan prosecutors and Afghan defense counsel are demonstrating their resolve and commitment to bringing the rule of law to their nation,” said BG Glanville. “The JCIP is a clear example of the working partnership between the Afghan government and coalition forces in bringing to justice those who violate the laws of Afghanistan in a fair, equitable and transparent manner,” he added. The creation of the JCIP was a critical step in establishing Afghan criminal trial processes for cases of terrorism and threats to Afghan national security. JCIP operations are crucial to transition elements of detainee operations and facilitate prosecution of suspected insurgents initially detained under the Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC) at the Detention Facility in Parwan (DFIP). The success of the JCIP is a significant milestone indicative of the increasing capability and capacity being built in partnership with the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan (GIRoA), and is a clear demonstration of Afghan sovereignty.
#### Louis D. Smith, Appellant, *v.*William F. Dugan et al., Appellants, and George D. Smith et al., Respondents.

*Smith*v. *Dugan,*145 App. Div. 877, affirmed.

(Argued March 28, 1912;

decided April 12, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment entered July 2T, 1911, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, which reversed a judgment entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and directed entry of judgment in accordance with the opinion of the court in an action for the construction of the wills of Hugh Smith and Andrew J. "Smith, deceased.

*Alexander L.. 8trouse*for plaintiff, appellant.

*Lucius H Beers*for defendants, appellants.

*557
      *Richard Gorman*for Mary J. Smith et al., respondents.

*Frederick Getter*and *James F. Horan*for Farmers’ Loan and Trust Company, as executor of Andrew J. Smith, deceased, respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to all parties who appeared in this court by attorney and filed briefs, payable out of the estate; no opinion.

Concur: Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ. Not sitting: Cullen, Oh. J.
----

(2004/C 84 E/0550)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1700/03

by Paulo Casaca (PSE) to the Commission

(22 May 2003)

Subject:   Financial corrections

In its reply concerning paragraph 2.57 of the 2001 Annual Report of the Court of Auditors (1) the Commission states ‘as part of the follow-up to the 2001 clearance process the Commission services have informed the Portuguese authorities that a financial correction of 2 % of Ifadap expenditure is proposed (EUR 2,8 million)’.

Can the Commission explain exactly what prompted it to impose the financial correction of EUR 2,8 million on Ifadap?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(2 July 2003)

The financial correction in question has not yet reached the final accounts clearance procedure, which includes a hearing stage at which the Member State can put forward its arguments.

If a financial correction decision is adopted we shall inform the Honourable Member.

----

(1)OJ C 295, 28.11.2002, p. 58.

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Chris L.
Koliopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Zygo Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Zygo
Corporation.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Zygo Corporation and will be retained by Zygo Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

| |                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | Dated:
 September 13, 2010                          
| |                                                     
| | /s/ Chris L.
 Koliopoulos                           
| |                                                     
| | Chris L.
 Koliopoulos                               
| | Chairman,
 President, and Chief Executive Officer of
| | Zygo
 Corporation                                   

---
‘N

July 1, 2014

gCannon

Employee Benefits Security Administration
Room N-5655

U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20210

Re: Target Date Fund Disclosure — RIN 1210-AB38
Dear Sir or Madam:

We appreciate that the period for public comment on proposed regulatory
amendments for target date funds has been reopened. We read many of the
comments on this topic that have been submitted to the Department of
Labor and they are all well intentioned. However, we work with plan
participants daily and find that unsolicited notices to plan participants do not
inform or educate. Why?

First, you have to talk to participants about their concerns, not what you
think they should be concerned about. Second, if an unsolicited notice is
over one page, no one reads it, We could go on, but the first two reasons
have already virtually eliminated all your potential readers.

So, what to do? Well, if you get participants in front of you, you certainly
greatly increase the odds of their learning something. For example,
employers could have annual meetings, one or many throughout the year,
where attendance is mandatory to cover all the topics that are now subject
to notice requirements.

We recommend that the DOL delay any additional notice requirements and
look for more effective ways to inform plan participants.

Respectively yours,
Ge Pies...

Joe B. Stallings, Jr., CFP®
Certified Financial PlannerTM professional

Phone: 706-548-3422
649-8 S, Milledge Ave. Phone: 888-685-4524
Athens, GA 30605 Fax: 706-548-4526