alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Nov. 12: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL in Syria and Iraq
 By U.S. Central Command News Release
  November 12, 2014 Release #20141108FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **TAMPA, Fla., Nov. 12, 2014 -**
 U.S. and partner nation military forces continued to attack ISIL 
terrorists in Syria Nov. 10-12 using bomber, fighter and remotely 
piloted aircraft to conduct sixteen airstrikes.  Separately, U.S. and 
partner nation military forces conducted seven airstrikes in Iraq Nov. 
10-12 using attack, fighter and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL 
terrorists. In Syria, ten airstrikes conducted near Kobani struck 
eight small ISIL units, damaged three ISIL fighting positions and 
destroyed an ISIL logistics facility.  There were two airstrikes south 
of Al-Haskah damaging a crude oil collection point operated by ISIL.  
Three airstrikes northeast of Dayr Az Zawr damaged an ISIL crude oil 
collection facility.  Near Dayr Az Zawr, one airstrike struck a small 
ISIL unit and damaged an ISIL vehicle. In Iraq, two airstrikes 
near Kirkuk struck a small ISIL unit and a large ISIL unit.  Five 
airstrikes near Bayji struck three small ISIL units, one large ISIL unit
 and destroyed two ISIL buildings, an ISIL sniper position, two ISIL 
vehicles, an ISIL mortar tube and an ISIL artillery piece.  All aircraft
 departed the strike areas safely.  Airstrike assessments are based on 
initial reports. The strikes were conducted as part of Inherent 
Resolve, the operation to eliminate the terrorist group ISIL and the 
threat they pose to Iraq, the region and the wider international 
community.  The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further 
limits the terrorist group's ability to project power and conduct 
operations.  Coalition nations conducting airstrikes in Iraq include the
 U.S., Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, the Netherlands and 
the United Kingdom.  Coalition nations conducting airstrikes in Syria 
include the U.S., Bahrain, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab 
Emirates.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.93 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         242,453
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               258,453
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 258,453
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           69,149
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        51,055
<OTHER-SE>                                     138,249
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   258,453
<SALES>                                        267,970
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                71,690
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (28,578)
<DISCONTINUED>                               4,033,790
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,005,212
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.03


</TABLE>
8/912010 

Office ofConsumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department ofHealth and Human Services 

'Attention: OCll0-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule fot:,Group,Bealth.Plans,and Health'lnsurance'Coverage"Retating 

to status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable 

Care Act 

I believe that every effort should be made to increase the number ofindividuals covered by 

PPACA, especially as ofJanuary 1,2014 when most ofthe reform components (Insurance 

Exchanges, Subsidies, Tax Credits, etc.) come into play. 

It is my opinion tbat the Rule will result in confusion in tbe marketplace in its application. 

For example, ifan employer raised the copayment level beyond the maximum in one area (i.e. 

-outpatient services) but retained the copayment level for primary care doctor visits, does that 

mean a loss ofgrandfather status? Clarity will be critical both for the employer and the 

employee. 

Even by the most optimistic estimates, a substantial portion ofthe employee population will 

remain outside the PPACA as ofJanuary 2014 based on the current rules. W,hiJe I understand ' 

the difficulty involved bl making cbange, creating another large sub-population of excluded 

individuals will only add to costs; increase confusion, and mitigate the potential impact of 

the legislation. ' 

The Rule needs to be ctear, reasonable, and-with no ambiguitiesinvolved'indetennining" 

wbetber a group bealth plan is "in or oot." The decisions tbe federal government makes 

today will determine tbeontcomes for tomorrow. We may need to make some difficult 

decisions to create a sustainable health care system thatwill support a growing economy in the 

future. That means getting as many citizens across the cOuntry participating at the beginning to 

make it work and delivering on its promises to retain their support. 

" comment on this regulation. 

D~ . b(fi~smn~ 

Kernersville, N .;
From: Andrea Whitson

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 10:55:09 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Andrea Whitson

1472 Bryan Ave

San Jose, CA 95118
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 97-60070

Summary Calendar

__________________

JAMES T. KIRKPATRICK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Mississippi

(1L96-CV-53 RG)

______________________________________________

August 25, 1997

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge:*

Appellant James T. Kirkpatrick appeals from an adverse summary

judgment dismissing his age discrimination claims against Yellow

Freight Systems, Inc. We have carefully reviewed the briefs,

pleadings, and summary judgment proof and conclude that appellant’s
2

claims on appeal are wholly without merit. Appellant’s summary

judgment proof fails to raise a genuine material fact issue that

his age was a material factor in his termination. We affirm

substantially for the same reasons set out in the district court’s

thorough and well-reasoned Memorandum Order dated January 17, 1997.

AFFIRMED.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22 - 0197

_________________ MICHAEL J. O ’ BRIEN and LINDA S. O ’ BRIEN,

Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. RAYMOND O ’ BRIEN, ERIN BRENTESON, RANDY BRENTESON and J.C. O ’ BRIEN & SONS, IN C., a Montana corporation,

Defendants and Appellees. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The C lerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable Heather Perry , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 5 2022

10/05/2022
Case Number: DA 22-0197
Exhibit 32.1  Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002    In connection with the Quarterly Report of NSTAR (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas J. May, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:(i)the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: May 5, 2009By:/s/ THOMAS J. MAYThomas J. MayChairman, President andChief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains  financial  information  extracted from the consolidated
financial  statements of FirstBank  Corp. for the nine months ended December 31,
1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001035513
<NAME>                   FirstBank Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                           1
<CURRENCY>                           USD
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                   OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                     DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                        1
<CASH>                            12,311
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>             2,460
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                   2,018
<TRADING-ASSETS>                       0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>       14,232
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>             4,050
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>               4,004
<LOANS>                          161,140
<ALLOWANCE>                        1,356
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   203,615
<DEPOSITS>                       128,736
<SHORT-TERM>                      16,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                2,985
<LONG-TERM>                       27,302
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                              20
<OTHER-SE>                        28,072
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>   203,615
<INTEREST-LOAN>                    9,976
<INTEREST-INVEST>                    689
<INTEREST-OTHER>                     607
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                  11,273
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                 3,698
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 5,470
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>              5,803
<LOAN-LOSSES>                        265
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                     0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                    5,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    2,314
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>         1,490
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                       1,490
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       0.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0.82
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                      3.09
<LOANS-NON>                          364
<LOANS-PAST>                          65
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                       0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                        0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                   1,120
<CHARGE-OFFS>                         29
<RECOVERIES>                           0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                  1,356
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>               1,356
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                    0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                0
        

</TABLE>
From: Jamie Valenta

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 9:25:24 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Jamie Valenta

3711 Donovan Ave

Bellingham, Wa 98229
From: Cathy Murphy

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Thursday, August 04, 2011 9:00:37 AM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Cathy Murphy
Columbus, Ohio
Exhibit 32.1 to Form 10-QSB

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Cecil a. Brooks does hereby  certify that the  Quarterly  Report of  Cornerstone
Ministries  Investments,  Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the six months  ended June 30,
2003 (the  "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 12, 2003.

/s/ Cecil A. Brooks Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

John T.  Ottinger,  does hereby  certify that the Annual  Report of  Cornerstone
Ministries  Investments,  Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the six months  ended June 30,
2003 (the  "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 12, 2003.

/s/ John T. Ottinger, Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---

---

Exhibit 23.11

Tel  Aviv, 29 March, 2007

CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Forms S-8, (File No.
333-61895, File No. 333-55970) and Forms S-3,( File No. 333-140968 , File No. 333-140969
and , File No. 333-140974) of our report dated February 24, 2005 relating to the financial
statements of Renaissance Investment Company LTD. which appears in this Form 10-K of Ampal
 American Israel Corporation.

---

|Kost Forer Gabbay & KasiererA member of Ernst & Young Global
|------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
From: Matt Meyers [mailto:mwm_37@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 2:13 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

Neither the Department of Labor nor the Department of Treasury should, under any 

circumstances, require any sort of lifetime income distribution for defined 

contribution plans. 

This would just be a case of the government stealing taxpayer money. 

The private sector has offered annuities for many years. This system is well 

regulated, yet many people aren't cashing out their 401(K)s and rolling them into 

annuities, because it is not beneficial to do so. People don't want annuities. There is 

no reason a government bureaucracy could make annuities financially 

advantageous. In addition, this bureaucracy would be directly competing with 

private entities that already provide annuities. 

Furthermore, in order to provide a 'risk-free' return, the confiscated funds would 

simply be deposited in long dated treasury securities. This is the same as Social 

Security, and we don't need another social security program. 

This program will also become another huge unfunded open ended liability, and we 

don't need any more of these. 

Finally, I recognize this for what it really is: a short-term way of paying for our giant 

fiscal deficit. A program like this will create an immediate flow of money which 

would be used to fund immediate spending, and pass our profligacy a few more 

years down the road. 

Matt Meyers 

330 NW 51st St 

Seattle, WA 98107 

I DO NOT ENDORSE ANYTHING THAT HOTMAIL PUTS BELOW THIS LINE 

_______________________________________________________________ 

Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 29, 2013

d0422

Order 

April 29, 2013

146402-4

DIANE M. BIES-RICE,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146402-3

COA: 295631; 295634

Wayne CC: 08-100728-DO

ALVIN FOSTER RICE, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

DAVID FINDLING,

Appellee.

_________________________________________/

DIANE M. BIES-RICE,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146404

COA: 300271

Wayne CC: 08-100728-DO

ALVIN FOSTER RICE, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 4, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.