alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**LINDA GLADZISZEWSKI,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES**  **GROUP, INC.),**

**Respondents :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 140 WAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from**

**the Order of the Commonwealth Court**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 13th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of** 

**Appeal is** DENIED

**.**
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-3859

Lower Tribunal No. 2023-DP-000116

_____________________________

In the Interest of M.J., a child.

V.J.R.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County.

Greg A. Tynan, Judge.

February 20, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

STARGEL, WOZNIAK and GANNAM, JJ., concur.

Amanda Peterson, of Law Offices of Peterson, P.A., Mulberry, for Appellant.

Kelley Schaeffer, Appellate Counsel, of Children’s Legal Services, Bradenton, for 

Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
U.S. and Partner aircrews conduct Middle East ‘PRESENCE PATROL’
 
  By Ninth Air Force (Air Forces Central)
  AL UDEID AIR BASE, Qatar – Coalition and regional partner air forces joined two U.S. Air Force B-52 Stratofortresses, two KC-10 Extenders, three KC-135s Stratotankerers on a presence patrol mission across the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility June 8, 2022.
The bomber’s flight originated at Minot Air Force Base (AFB), North Dakota, and flew over the East Mediterranean, Arabian Peninsula, and Red Sea before departing the region.
“Presence patrols, like todays, show the United States’ continued commitment and interoperability with our partners in the region,” said Lt. Gen. Greg Guillot, Ninth Air Force (AFCENT) commander. “These highly coordinated efforts demonstrate our combined ability to provide global reach and joint security to the region.”
The flow of air power throughout the theater during this presence patrol was significant due to the number of joint and regional partners participating and the long duration of the U.S.-based mission, which demonstrated U.S. capabilities to rapidly respond to threats worldwide. The nine-hour presence patrol flew into the USCENTCOM AOR over the Red Sea and conducted rejoins with partner nations along the flight path before departing the region.
The B-52 and their aircrew are assigned to 5th Bomb Wing, Minot AFB and flew the mission under Air Force Global Strike Command’s bomber task force mission-set.
USCENTCOM, through Ninth Air Force (AFCENT), has facilitated three presence patrol missions in 2022 as a demonstration of the U.S.-led coalition’s commitment to promoting regional stability. The last bomber-led mission across the Central Region involved one B-52 and occurred Mar. 29, 2022.
Hillsborough,

June, 1895.

#### Lesser & *a. v.*New Hampshire Furniture Co.

How far the cross-examination of a witness may be carried for the purpose of discrediting him, is a question of fact to be determined at the trial term.

Assumpsit, for goods sold and delivered. Trial by jury. Verdict for the plaintiffs. The writ is dated May 19, 1894; and the only question wras whether payment for the goods was then due, the plaintiffs claiming that it became due May 10, and the defendant that it was not due until June 10. John W. Wood, who was sole defendant (doing business in the name of the N. H. Furniture Co.), testified in his own behalf, to the effect that, by the agreement for the purchase of the goods, payment was not due until June 10. Upon cross-examination, the plaintiffs were allowed to ask questions, subject to exception, which drew out the following testimony, in substance: The capital in *344the business was about $12,000, and was borrowed upon the ■defendant’s notes, indorsed by a friend. On May 29, 1894, the defendant sold and transferred the stock and business to a corporation having a capital of about $10,000, of which $8,000 or .$9,000 was contributed by the defendant, by the transfer of the stock of goods to the corporation. The defendant was president of the corporation. The corporation closed its doors July 26, 1894. Its liabilities were about $50,000. It paid its unsecured creditors thirty cents on a dollar. A committee of the creditors •examined into its affairs and recommended a settlement on that basis, which was proposed by the creditors and accepted by Wood for the corporation. Wood claimed that the corporation was solvent, but was forced to a settlement by the action of the creditors.

*John W. Center,*for the plaintiffs.

*Edwin F.*Jones, for the defendant.

Wallace, J.

The cross-examination in this case was designed to discredit the defendant, who was a witness in his own behalf. How far justice required this inquiry should be carried, was a question of fact to be determined at the trial term, and the right ■of cross-examination was not affected by the fact that the witness was a party. There was no error of law in permitting the cross-.examination to take the course it did, nor in the admission of the testimony which it evoked. *Gutterson*v. Morse, 58 N. H. 165; *Plummer*v. *Ossipee,*59 N. H. 55; *Free*v. Buckingham, 59 N. H. 219, 226; *Merrill*v. Perkins, 59 N. H. 343; *Perkins*v. *Towle,*59 N. H. 583; *Watson*v. *Twombly,*60 N. H. 491; *Amoskeag Co.*v. *Worcester,*60 N. H, 522, 525.

*Exceptions overruled.*

■Chase, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
Coos,

June, 1894.

#### Watson *v.*Grand Trunk Railway Co.

No action lies against a person causing a defect in a highway for an injury resulting therefrom, if the laying out of the highway has been quashed upon *certiorari.*

Case, for injuries arising from a defect caused by the defendants in a highway. To show the existence of the alleged highway, the plaintiff introduced in evidence, subject to the defendants’ exception, the record, of the laying out referred to in *Grand Trunk Railway Co.*v. *Berlin, ante, p.*168. That case is made a part of this. The plaintiff’s evidence tended to show that while he was traveling upon this highway with a horse and carriage, the horse took fright at a car left by the defendants upon their branch railroad within the limits of the highway, in consequence of which he was thrown out of the carriage and injured. There *171was a verdict for the plaintiff which the defendants moved to set aside.

*TwitcheU Libby,*for the plaintiff

*Almon A. Strout*(of Maine), *Robert N. Chamberlin,*and *Bingham & Bingham,*for the defendants.

Chase, J.

The decision of this cause was deferred to await the determination of the action, *Grand Trunk Railway Co.*v. *Berlin, ante, p.*168. By the judgment in that case, it is established that there was, as against these defendants, no lawful highway at the place of the alleged incumbrance.

*Verdict set aside.*

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1492
In Re: LINDA L. KING, Debtor.
LINDA L. KING, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus IRVING EVANS; GARNET EVANS, Defendants - Appellees, and ELLEN W. COSBY, Trustee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA01-33, CA-01-34, BK-00-2078-5-JS) Submitted: September 20, 2001 Decided: September 25, 2001 Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Linda L. King, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:Linda L. King appeals from the district court’s orders dismissing her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order for failure to comply with Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8009(a), and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the districtcourt’s orders and find no reversible error and no abuse of discretion. See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8001(a); In re Serra Builders, Inc. , 970 F.2d 1309, 1311 (4th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. King v. Evans , Nos. CA-01-33; CA01-34; BK-00-2078-5-JS (D. Md. Mar. 16, 2001 & Mar. 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
The files in this archive are tables and data used in the BJS report
"Carjackings in the United States, 1992-96" which can be found at
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/cus96.htm.

Contents of this archive include:

tb1cj.wk1     Table 1:  Characteristics of carjacking victims, by rates per 10,000 persons, 1992-96
tb2cj.wk1     Table 2:  Measures that victims of carjacking took to protect themselves, 1992-96
tb3cj.wk1     Table 3:  Characteristics of carjacking offenders, 1992-96
tb4cj.wk1     Table 4:  Place where carjackings occurred, 1992-96
vicnocj.wk1   Number of victims in carjacking incidents
injcj.wk1     Carjacking injury victimizations
treatcj.wk1   Type of treatment received by carjacking victims
timecj.wk1    Time of occurrence of carjacking
polrepcj.wk1  Police reporting of carjacking
recovrcj.wk1  Recovery of property in carjacking
inscj.wk1     Insurance coverage in carjacking
relcj.wk1     Carjacking by persons known to victim
murcj.wk1     Murder with auto theft for carjacking report
proscj.wk1    Federal prosecution of carjacking
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1 MB)
 
 CENTCOM Partnership KC-10 Extender Aerial refueling Egypt BrightStar2023
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### Susan Barton, Plaintiff, v. Horace W. Barton, Defendant.

Order reversed, without costs.
Page | of |
oIh53.0N

LEGAL Po GuraTIONS §— A206! /8Y/2-
PUBLICAIIUN & REOULA! PEC MEV EAM SEP 0 1201

As of: August 31, 2010

PUBLIC Status Posted,

Posted: August 31, 2010
SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0491
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

—
Submitter Information

Name: jack d hollada
Address:

200 e beardstown street

virginia, IL, 62691
Email: dochollada@gmail.com

<a —— —

General Comment

This whole grandfathering in thing kinda sounds like political pay-back, doesn't it..

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=..._ 8/31/2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           45879
<SECURITIES>                                    169605
<RECEIVABLES>                                    12695
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                228179
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  228179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1000
<OTHER-SE>                                      227179
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    228179
<SALES>                                           4543
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4543
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  4543
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT CHRISTOPHER D. WARD, DOC #979923, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1778 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed March 15, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Ramiro Manalich, Judge. Christopher D. Ward, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, SLEET, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

McDATA Corporation

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,

United States Code), each of the undersigned
officers of McDATA Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company),

does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge,
that:

The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                      |  |                                                                
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: April 24, 2006 |  | /s/ SCOTT BERMAN                                               
|                      |  | Scott Berman                                                   
|                      |  | Executive Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1010

AN ACT

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction

of a hydroelectric project in the State of North Carolina.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 1010 ES

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY

2 REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period

4 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16

5 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal En6 ergy Regulatory Commission project number 11437, the

7 Commission may, at the request of the licensee for the

8 project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with

9 the requirements of that section and the Commission’s

10 procedures under that section, extend the time period dur11 ing which the licensee is required to commence the con12 struction of the project for 3 consecutive 2-year periods.

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) takes effect

14 on the date of the expiration of the extension issued by

15 the Commission before the date of the enactment of this

16 Act under section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C.

17 806).

Passed the Senate August 1, 2002.

Attest:

Secretary.
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1010

AN ACT

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a hydroelectric project in the State

of North Carolina.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.8 MB)
 
 JRTC Fort Polk Joint Readiness Training Center FORT BENNING andsf 1st Security Force Assistance Brigade 1st SFAB Afghan National Defense Security Forces combat advising
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
-----Original Message----- 

From: Stu Rugg [mailto:stu_rugg@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 11:24 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Comment on Lifetime Income RFI - Annuities 

If the government is going to enhance retirement retirement security 

for workers, and rule that companies must allow them to roll over into 

an annuity, then one option in the annuity must be a GIC - Guaranteed 

Income Contract. This investment option guarantees the principal and 

sets a fixed interest rate. The owner then can draw funds (minimum 

annual withdrawals per the IRS schedule must occur) from the GIC per 

their needs BUT any residual funds upon death would be transferred to 

their assigned heirs. 

If an insurance company cannot offer this product, then the US 

government should offer it. 

Thank you in advance for considering this comment. 

Stuart Rugg
#### Clara F. Vischer, Respondent, v. Stanley Bagg, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Hardin. P. J.
From: Valerie Garrison

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 12:41:06 AM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Valerie Garrison

717 Princeton Mill Run

Marietta, GA 30068
From: Vickie Phan

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 7:09:49 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Vickie Phan

10031 Traylor Way

Garden Grove, Ca 92843
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                              ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT





The Board of Directors
Spire Corporation:


       We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 of Spire Corporation of our report dated March 8, 1999, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Spire Corporation and subsidiary as of December
31, 1997 and 1998, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 1998, which report appears in the December 31, 1998
annual report on Form 10-KSB of Spire Corporation.


                              /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP           
                              -------------------------------------
                              KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
March 31, 1999



                                       39