alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Theresa Chen

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Thursday, August 04, 2011 9:46:56 AM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Theresa Chen

105 Exeter Ct

Cary, NC 27511
#### Lewis M. Smith, Plaintiff, v. Henry J. Daggett and another, Defendants.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Follett. J.
-----Original Message----- 

From: John Link [mailto:johnlink@nyc.rr.com] 

Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 9:30 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 

I understand that there is a proposal to have the federal government 

forcibly manage privately owned retirement accounts. I am OPPOSED to 

any such action and would consider it a serious violation of property 

rights. 

John Link, Ph.D.
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed August 31, 2022

.

________________

No. 3D22

- 0810

Lower Tribunal No. 19

- 0290

- P

________________



### Steven Stratton, et al.

, Appellant s

,

vs.



### Christina Intoccia, et al.

, Appellee s

.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Timothy J. Koenig , Judge.

Clark, Fountain, La Vista, Prather & Littky

- Rubin, LLP, and Julie H. Littky

- Rubin (West Palm Beach) , for appellant s

.

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, and James H. Wyman, for appellee s

.

Before LOGUE, LINDSEY, and BOKOR , JJ.

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR2 PER CURIAM.

Appellees (Defendants below) Christina and Louise Intoccia

commendably concede that the trial court erred in dismissing the case

without considering the factors set forth in Kozel v. Ostendorf , 629 So. 2d

817 (Fla. 1993). We accept Appellees’ confession of error

, reverse the order

of dismissal, and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 
  FIRST

        

        

        
        1 (current)
        
        2
        
        3
        
        4
        

        


        


        LAST
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Vicki Chessin, MD

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 1:15:50 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Vicki Chessin, MD

1910 N Pine Ave

alma, MI 48801
From: Isis Luna

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 4:43:53 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Isis Luna

145 Franklin Street, Apt. 5

Brooklyn, NY 11222
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.82 MB)
 
 75th Ranger Regiment Van Aalst Ceremony
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 76 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         March 6, 2001.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Standards of Official Conduct: Mr. Portman, Mr. Hastings of 
Washington, Mr. Hutchinson, and Mrs. Biggert.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Page 1 of 1

SS 3 am Rec ieir-

LEGAL PRG 2S551NG DIVISION
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS
oe BRANCH

As of: September 03, 2010

PUBLIC Status Poste

Posted: September 03, 2010
SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0668
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

LS eT

Submitter Information

Name: Eric Dahl
Address:
1540 E Fairview Ave
Ste. 104
Meridian, 1D, 83642
Email: dahidc@hotmail.com
Phone: 208-377-2225
Submitter's Representative: Self
Organization: Discover Chiropractic Center

General Comment

Please retain "grandfather clause" in this PPACA.

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 9/3/2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           9,498
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                69,400
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    244,765
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          33,833
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            34,248
<LOANS>                                        483,282
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,074
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 872,478
<DEPOSITS>                                     491,631
<SHORT-TERM>                                    30,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              8,711
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           363
<OTHER-SE>                                     341,773
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 872,478
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,763
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,341
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,322
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                14,426
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,074
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,536
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,890
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      709
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 300
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,984
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,374
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,374
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,278
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.84
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,567
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,775
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   512
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  4,567
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,966
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      618
<RECOVERIES>                                        17
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,074
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,074
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             24
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 5596-020]

                    On July 31, 2023, the Town of Bedford, Virginia submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) a copy of its request for a Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) water quality certification filed with the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (Virginia DEQ), in conjunction with the above captioned project. Pursuant to 40 CFR 121.6 and section 5.23(b) of the Commission's regulations,[1]                                          we hereby notify the Virginia DEQ of the following:                

*Date of Receipt of the Certification Request:*                     July 28, 2023.                

*Reasonable Period of Time to Act on the Certification Request:*                     One year (July 28, 2024).                

If Virginia DEQ fails or refuses to act on the water quality certification request on or before the above date, then the agency certifying authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).

Dated: August 15, 2023.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             18 CFR 5.23(b).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2023-17906 Filed 8-18-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
From: Edward White

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210 AB44

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 9:51:04 PM

This comment is submitted in relation to Department of Labor Rulemaking docket RIN 1210 AB 44, "Group Health Plans and Health 

Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services 

under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

The definition of "religious employer" should be expanded beyond 

that proposed in order to appropriately and adequately protect the 

conscious rights of all religious organizations. As written, the 

conscious clause for religious employers would leave outside its 

protection a wide group of religious organizations that provide 

important and significant social services to their communities, and 

force them either to cease providing health insurance coverage or 

violate their religious scruples. For instance, Catholic Charities and 

most Catholic hospitals would not, it seems to this commenter, 

meet all four of the conjunctive conditions in the rule to qualify as a

religious employer. Catholic organizations often employ nonCatholics in accomplishing their religious mission -- for example, 

Jewish doctors might work at a Catholic hospital. Likewise, these 

employers often serve all in need, without restricting their services 

and charity solely to Catholics. Yet, because of this ecumenical 

approach to charity, they would fail to qualify as a religious 

employer, and not fall within the conscious protection the rule 

provides. 

Broader protections for the conscious of religious organizations is an

absolutely necessity in order to protect and advance our American 

notions of religious freedom and free exercise. I urge the 

Department to broaden the religious conscious clause protections of

this rule to cover organizations such as religious institutions like 

Catholic universities and hospitals, as well as social services 

organizations such as Catholic Charities, Catholic Relief Services and

the like.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                         UNITED BANCORP, INC. FORM 10-K





                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No.
333-01081) for United Bancorp, Inc., the 1995 Dividend Reinvestment Plan, of our
report dated January 10, 2002 appearing in this annual report on Form 10-K of
United Bancorp, Inc relating to the consolidated balance sheets of United
Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001.


                                             Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP


Columbus, Ohio
March 15, 2002
#### Anna Dunfee et al., as Executors of John Dunfee, Deceased, Respondents, *v.*Joseph Dunfee, Defendant, and Empire State Surety Company, Appellant.

*Dunfee*v. *Dunfee,*145 App. Div. 108, affirmed.

(Argued March 7, 1912;

decided March 26, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 12, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict in an action upon a surety bond.

*Benjamin Reass*for appellant.

*John W. Hogan*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
.TEXT {        font-size:12pt;        font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;        }                .SMALL1 {        font-size:10pt;        font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;        }.SMALL2 {        font-size:10pt;        font-family: verdana;        }        .SMALL3 {        font-size:10pt;        font-family: courier;        }.GUTTER1 {        font-size:12pt;    font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;    color:#ffcc66;    }.GUTTER2 {        font-size:10pt;        font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;        color:#ffffff;        }        .GUTTER3 {        font-size:10pt;        font-family: verdana;        color:#CCCCff;        }                        A.BAR {        color:#ffffff;        font-size:10pt;        font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;        text-decoration:none;        }A.HELPBAR {        color:#000000;        font-size:10pt;        font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;        text-decoration:none;        }A.GUTTER1 {        color:#ffcc66;        font:12pt arial,helvetica,sans-serif;        text-decoration:none;        }        A.GUTTER2 {        color:#ffffff;        font-size:10pt;        font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;        text-decoration:none;        }        A.H1 {        font-size:18pt;        font-weight: bold;        font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;        color:#000000;        text-decoration:none;        }A.H6 {        font-size:10pt;        font-weight: bold;        font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;        color:#000000;        text-decoration:none;        }        A.TEXT {        font:12pt arial,helvetica,sans-serif;        color:#000000;        margin-top: -4 pt;        text-decoration:none;        }                H1, .H1 {        font-size:18pt;        font-weight: bold;        font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;        }        H2, .H2 {        font-size:16pt;        font-weight: bold;        font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;        }H3, .H3 {        font-size:14pt;        font-weight: bold;        font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;        }H4, .H4 {        font-size:12pt;        font-weight: bold;        font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;        }H5, .H5 {        font-size:12pt;        font-weight: bold;        font-style: italic;        font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;        }        H6, .H6 {        font-size:10pt;        font-weight: bold;        font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;        }
# May 22: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL Terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published May 26, 2015

May 22, 2015

Release # 20150522.1FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**SOUTHWEST ASIA –**Coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq between 8 a.m., May 21, and 8 a.m., May 22, local time. In Syria, coalition military forces conducted five airstrikes using attack and fighter aircraft. Separately in Iraq, coalition military forces conducted 15 airstrikes approved by the Iraqi Ministry of Defense using attack, bomber, fighter and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL terrorists. 

"Daesh continues harassing attacks against the Peshmerga near Sinjar,” said Col. Wayne Marotto, CJTF-OIR chief of public affairs. “The KSF, enabled by the Coalition, repeatedly repel these attacks.”

The following is a summary of the strikes conducted since the last press release:

**Syria**

         Near Al Hasakah, two airstrikes destroyed an ISIL vehicle and an ISIL VBIED.

         Near Dayr Az Zawr, two airstrikes struck two ISIL wellheads.

         Near Kobani, one airstrike destroyed an ISIL fighting positon.

**Iraq**

         Near Al Asad, two airstrikes destroyed five ISIL buildings.

         Near Haditha, one airstrike struck an ISIL staging area.

         Near Mosul, four airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit, destroying two ISIL tunnel systems, an ISIL motorcycle, an ISIL vehicle and an ISIL cache.

         Near Ramadi, five airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit, destroying five ISIL armored vehicles, two ISIL tanks, two ISIL vehicles, an ISIL armored personnel carrier, three ISIL IEDs, five abandoned tanks, two abandoned armored personnel carriers and two abandoned armored vehicles.

         Near Sinjar, three airstrikes struck three ISIL tactical units, destroying four ISIL buildings, two ISIL heavy machine guns and an ISIL mortar system.

Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely.

The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria, the region and the wider international community. The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Iraq include Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Syria include Bahrain, Canada, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and the U.S.