alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.83 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Exhibit 10-30-2

                             SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
                               UNICOM CORPORATION
                            STOCK BONUS DEFERRAL PLAN

         WHEREAS, on October 9, 2000, the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors of Unicom Corporation authorized (i) the transfer of sponsorship of
the Unicom Corporation Stock Bonus Deferral Plan, as amended and restated,
effective September 30, 1998, and as amended by the First Amendment thereto,
also effective September 30, 1998 (the "SBDP") from Unicom Corporation to Exelon
Corporation and the substitution of common stock of Exelon Corporation for any
reference to the common stock of Unicom Corporation, effective as of the
effective date of the merger of Unicom Corporation with and into Exelon
Corporation (the "Merger Effective Date"); and

         WHEREAS, it is necessary and appropriate to make other amendments to
the SBDP;

         NOW THEREFORE, the SBDP is hereby amended as follows, effective as of
the Merger Effective Date, except as otherwise specified below:


                                        I

         The SBDP is renamed the Exelon Corporation Stock Deferral Plan.


                                       II

         Exelon Corporation is substituted for Unicom Corporation as the
"Company", and "Exelon Stock" is substituted for any references to "Unicom
Stock".


                                       III

         Each outstanding deferred share of common stock of Unicom Corporation
credited on behalf of any SBDP participant is hereby converted to a deferred
share of common stock of Exelon Corporation, using a conversion rate 0.875 of
one deferred share of common stock of Exelon Corporation for each deferred share
of common stock of Unicom Corporation, and the $3 per share cash consideration
provided with respect to each such deferred share of common stock of Unicom
Corporation shall be credited as additional deferred shares of common stock of
Exelon Corporation, using the opening price of such common stock of Exelon





<PAGE>

Corporation on the date such stock is first traded on the New York Stock
Exchange.

                                       IV

In all other respects, the SBDP shall remain in full force and effect.


         Executed this __ day of October, 2000.




                                       UNICOM CORPORATION



                                       By: /s/ S. Gary Snodgrass
                                           ------------------------------
                                            S. Gary Snodgrass
                                            Senior Vice President and
                                            Chief Human Resources Officer
#### William Crabtree, Respondent, v. Richard W. Pritchard, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. Opinion by Kennedy, J.
Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2016 11:45 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Department of Labor, RIN-1210-AB39

I would like to comment on my support of the Proposed Regulations issued by the Department of 

Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration. Though I don't believe I am eligible for any 

benefits from disability insurance ( I don't really know the criteria), I have battled ME/CFS for 

15 years after receiving a flu shot. Doctor after doctor discouraged me from pursuing any type 

of assistance, as they were unable to give me a diagnosis. I lost my entire savings (which was to 

be the down-payment on a home) and went into debt while trying to find a way to earn an 

income. I have lived in poverty ever since and am now living with my mother while I continue 

to try to have some type of existence that resembles a life.

Thank you for your attempts to bring light to the severity of this illness, which I hope will have a ripple 

effect in the medical community.

Best wishes,
https://fdms.erulemaking.net/.../component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=Print&PrintId=0900006480b2f7b3&Comment=true[8/13/2010 3:59:02 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: August 13, 2010

Received: August 13, 2010

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 80b2f7b3

Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: HHS-OS-2010-0015

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as a Grandfathered

Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: HHS-OS-2010-0015-0001

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as a Grandfathered

Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: HHS-OS-2010-0015-DRAFT-0040

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

General Comment

What impact does "grandfathered status" have on a plans' ability to maintain its current plan design from 2014

onward, when PPACA will begin to impose penalties on plans that do not meet "minimum essential benefit"

designs and have employees who receive credits for coverage in the exchanges? Will grandfathered plans be able

to maintain their existing plan design without risk of such penalities after 2014? The interim regulations are not

clear on this point.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.59 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### George Palmateer, Appellant, *v.*Joseph A. Oaks et al., Respondents.

*Palmateer*v. OaZcs, 140 App. Div. 945, affirmed.

(Argued May 14, 1912;

decided June 4, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, *619entered December 1,1910, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term, a jury having been waived, in an action of ejectment.

*John A. Delehcmty*for appellant.

*Marcus T. Hun*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
V-1

Miscellaneous Statutory Provisions SECTION V

SECTION V

MISCELLANEOUS STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

The second set of miscellaneous statutory

provisions focuses on certain materials that were

not covered by Subtitles C, D, or I: namely,

medical wastes. These requirements imposed a

tracking system to ensure the safe and protective

management of potentially harmful wastes.

This section consists of two chapters:

• Federal Procurement Requirements — To

promote recycling, encourage the

development of recycling technologies, and

develop the market for products with recycled

content, RCRA contains specific federal

procurement requirements.

• Medical Waste Regulations — To ensure the

tracking and safe management of medical

waste, RCRA established a medical waste

demonstration program.

Both of these aspects of the RCRA program

are carefully detailed in separate chapters in this

section.

In this section...

Overview........................................................... V-1

Chapter 1: Federal Procurement

Requirements ............................. V-3

Chapter 2: Medical Waste Regulations ........ V-9

OVERVIEW

All RCRA provisions do not fit neatly into the

solid waste, hazardous waste, and UST regulatory

frameworks. The Statute established additional

miscellaneous provisions to further the goals of the

waste management program, and to address

materials that were not covered by Subtitles C, D,

or I.

The first set of these miscellaneous statutory

provisions focuses on promoting recycling and

developing a market for products with recycled

content: the federal procurement requirements.
CERTIFICATIONS*



EXHIBIT 10.8



Amendment to

Continental Airlines, Inc. Executive Bonus Performance Award Program



This Amendment (this "Amendment") to the Continental Airlines, Inc. Executive Bonus Performance Award Program (as amended and restated through February 20, 2002) (the "Program") is dated as of March 12, 2004 and has been adopted by the Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors of Continental Airlines, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on March 12, 2004.



1.  Pursuant to Section 8 of the Program (which provides for amendments to the Program), the Program is hereby amended as follows:



The first sentence of Section 7 of the Program is hereby amended by deleting the date "May 15, 2001" that appears in the second line thereof and replacing such date with the phrase "March 12, 2004 after giving effect to amendments thereto through such date". 



2. The Program, as amended by this Amendment, shall apply to all Awards made under the Program on or after the date hereof and to all outstanding Awards made under the Program prior to the date hereof inasmuch as the changes to the Program effected hereby do not impair the rights of any Participant. In all other respects, the Program shall continue in full force and effect with respect to all Awards made thereunder.



3.  Capitalized terms used in this Amendment without definition are defined in the Program and are used in this Amendment with the same meanings as in the Program.



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Amendment on behalf of the Company as of March 12, 2004.

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.


 

By:_/s/ Jeffery A. Smisek__________

Jeffery A. Smisek

Executive Vice President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7543

LAKEITHON M. HALL, a/k/a Lakeithan Hall, 

 Petitioner – Appellant, 

 v. 

MCKITHER BODISON, Warden Lieber Correctional Institution, 

 Respondent – Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. 

(8:08-cv-02468-RBH) 

Submitted: January 14, 2010 Decided: January 21, 2010 

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Lakeithon M. Hall, Appellant Pro Se. James Anthony Mabry, 

Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Deputy 

Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Lakeithon M. Hall seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find 

that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district 

court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural 

ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El 

v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 

(4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Hall has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
APPENDIX N. Evaluation Guidelines for Ecological Toxicity Data in the 

Open Literature. 

(75 pages)
#### GEORGE ROICH, RELATOR, v. THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY AND THE BOARD OF HEALTH OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY, RESPONDENTS.

Submitted May 12, 1933

Decided August 29, 1933.

*734Before Justices Oase, Bodine and Donges.

For the relator, *Nicholas McLaughlin, Jr.*

For the respondents, *James C. Agnew.*

Per Curiam.

Relator seeks *mandamus*to compel the issuance of a license and permit to operate a live poultry market in premises owned by him in Union City.

The health ordinance vests the health officer with discretion in granting a permit. Section 9, ordinance of July 30th, 1928. Without such permit no license can be granted.

Live poultry markets are not favorably' regarded by the health officer of Union City because of the stench and vermin incident thereto. Uo licenses, save renewals, have been granted since the adoption some years ago of commission government.

There is nothing in the record to indicate that the license and permit were in effect granted. In fact, everything of record indicates that the authorities continuously refused like applications. A short time before another application for the property was denied. We are not confronted with the situation existing in *Garber*v. *Board of Health of Paterson, 4 N. J. Mis. R.*83; 131 *Atl. Rep.*638, but rather the situation in *Doben*v. *Board of Health of Paterson,*3 *N. J. Mis. R.*38; 127 *Atl. Rep.*38, where the writ was denied because the board of health was vested with a discretion.

It seems that the board of commissioners may very well refuse to issue new permits for what they believe to be an unnecessary and an unsanitary business. Because there are some poultry markets which have been conducted for a long time, is no reason for the allowance of others, even though the effect of the action may be that fewer persons may engage in the business.

As before indicated, the granting of the permit and license *735rests in the sound discretion of the health officer and the board of commissioners and there is nothing in the record to indicate that they have abused that discretion.

The rule will be discharged.
From: Stranscak@aol.com [mailto:Stranscak@aol.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 8:56 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: (no subject)

I agree with the statement below. 

 

To: e-ORI@dol.gov

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

The Proposed Annuitization Of 401(k) 

Request For Information 

 Here is my understanding of the basic concept: the federal government will take the money out 

of my 401(k) in exchange for a promised stream of income for the rest of my life after I retire. 

 

How is this different from Social Security? 

How is this any different than the promise the federal government made when social security 

began under President Franklin Roosevelt? 

 

There would not be this discussion today if the original promise of social security had not 

changed over the years. 

 

Politicians could not keep their hands off the social security fund over the years and now the fund 

is empty – full of I.O.U.s. Today it is a Ponzi scheme requiring current contributors to pay for 

current retirees. 

 

The same changes will be made by politicians, to this “promise”, as the years roll along. 

Therefore I reject any plan that allows the federal government to take my 401(k) money. 

 

If the federal government wants to help future Americans enjoy retirement – see that Americans 

are taught how to do their own planning for retirement. This teaching should be started in high 

school. 

 

In general the federal government has demonstrated to me that “they” are no good at social 

management which supports American’s freedom and liberty. 

 

Therefore, if I hear that the federal government is really “thinking” about taking my 401(k) and IRA 

money and replacing my money with a promise (annuitize it), I will cash out my 401(k) and IRA, 

pay the taxes, and invest my money elsewhere. 

Donald Grimes 

Professional Engineer 

Findlay, Ohio 

 

Regards, 

Frank Stranscak 

216-789-0264 Cell 

440-582-5040 Office 

440-582-5041 Fax
#### Timothy Connors and others, Appellants, v. Peter A. Tilyou and others. Respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs. Opinions by Pratt and Dykman, jj.; Barnard, P. J., not sitting
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Silverado Gold Mines,
Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Garry L. Anselmo, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

*/s/ Garry L.
Anselmo*Garry L. Anselmo, Principal Executive Officer

March 15, 2011

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>      5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                     APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                     438
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            1,947
<ALLOWANCES>                                               (39)
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             0
<PP&E>                                                     152
<DEPRECIATION>                                            (129)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           2,369
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      232
<BONDS>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                   587
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                               1,550
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             2,369
<SALES>                                                    815
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           815
<CGS>                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           425
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            390
<INCOME-TAX>                                              (418)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                               808
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0.69



</TABLE>