alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1450.html[7/23/2015 11:09:55 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvo-9mum

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1450

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Dan Cooke

General Comment

I'm smart enough to plan for my own retirement.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  OCT-28-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                     OCT-30-1994
<PERIOD-END>                                       OCT-28-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                              1
<CASH>                                                     319
<SECURITIES>                                               450
<RECEIVABLES>                                            6,787
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                              8,056
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        16,818
<PP&E>                                                  19,182
<DEPRECIATION>                                          12,107
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          24,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    7,827
<BONDS>                                                  2,500
<COMMON>                                                 2,004
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                               4,899
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            24,648
<SALES>                                                 41,102
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        41,102
<CGS>                                                   32,146
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           38,968
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         523
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          2,134
<INCOME-TAX>                                               805
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      1,329
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                             1,329
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             2.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             1.45

</TABLE>
II

Calendar No. 128

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1026

To designate the United States Post Office located at 60 Third Avenue

in Long Branch, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Pat King Post Office Building’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 13, 2001

Mr. TORRICELLI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

AUGUST 2, 2001

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment

A BILL

To designate the United States Post Office located at 60

Third Avenue in Long Branch, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Pat

King Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PAT KING POST OFFICE

4 BUILDING.

5 The United States Post Office located at 60 Third

6 Avenue in Long Branch, New Jersey, shall be known and

7 designated as the ‘‘Pat King Post Office Building’’.
2

•S 1026 RS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

4 States Post Office referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

5 to be a reference to the Pat King Post Office Building.

Calendar No. 128

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1026

A BILL

To designate the United States Post Office located

at 60 Third Avenue in Long Branch, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Pat King Post Office Building’’.

AUGUST 2, 2001

Reported without amendment
EXHIBIT
32
 
 Certification
of Periodic Report
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 As
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  Pursuant
to, and for purposes only of, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned hereby certifies
that (i) the Quarterly Report of Shore Bancshares, Inc. on Form 10-Q, as amended
on Form 10-Q/A, for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii)
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Shore Bancshares,
Inc.
   Date:
      July 7, 2009
                /s/ W.
      Moorhead VermilyeW.
      Moorhead VermilyePresident/Chief
      Executive Officer
  Date:
      July 7, 2009
              /s/ Susan
      E. LeavertonSusan
      E. Leaverton, CPATreasurer/Principal Accounting
      Officer
**National Aeronautics and                             May 20, 1996Space Administration                                NRA 96-OSS-09**

RESEARCH ANNOUNCEMENT

SUN-EARTH CONNECTION

SUPPORTING RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY,SUBORBITAL, GUEST INVESTIGATOR, ANDEDUCATION PROGRAMS

INCLUDING APPENDICES A-D

NOTICE OF INTENT DUE:                                           JUNE 20, 1996
PROPOSALS DUE:                                                   AUGUST 20, 1996
582 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUgllN 

mm. L L. d4w.n 

tkwlty Attorlmy 

Ltsa5tone htlntf 

Dear Sir1 

tha ahovd 5ta* 

llyeonsidsred 
mabY. to find any statutory authority whfoh would 

allow the oommlrreionsr8 or Umeetone County any exponsee 

for tripe cut ot the county on 0itLoial busLaineee. 

This deptmtuont haa repeatedly held, thut In 

the absence of a *nlid statute, the dozmioalcmers oourt 

has no authority tolow any 8ms of aoney to lte ZHQbera for expsuma. 

The oaaei8sfon~ra~ aourt in the absenor of 

a VRlItd statute la unauthorized to allow autonmblle 

0-8 to it8 member8. Sea letter Opinions of this 

departmsrt, Vol. 550, page 642, dated Nemh l%th, 1958, 

wrlttsn by lion. James W. Hair, ksabtant Attmrmy Oanbral, 

and addreasod to &XI. R. #. %ripllPg, County 3ud@e, 

S~JI Augustine, Texfm. 

Opinion I&. O$QO of this department, held 

Eouae Bill Xo. 806 of the 46th ~gialature at TOXINS, 

relating to travellug expensea oi oounty a~slonera 

in oountlea hoPias a-population.of nat lms thantZ,lOO 

an6 not EOXB than 32,500, aooomling to the last preoediBg ~OdQlWl ce5SU8, WU6 U5~055t~f~ti056~ 15 t&t it **18 

a apeolal or loeel lew regulating the affairs ofmmnt&as end prohibfted by lseatlon S6 of Artlole EtX: oi the 

wl8titutlon of TQxRe. 

The eamlasioners? oourt, la the absence of 

a valid stetute, does not hev'o atxthority to all&n theatse~expsnae none !'or gesoline spent in disoharge of 

their dutleti. 300 L tter Opinions of this departroent, 

dated Juriuary ES, 1935, written by Hon. la05 0. 18em, 

cOealstant Attorney General of Texae, addTossed to Hon. 

W. C. RoEkmeld, Count0 Att~ma~, Xoabert ha, Texas. 

Also see opinions Mos.. HO-?%3, O-890, O-996 

and O-1545 of this departwent, 

You are, therefore, seeps&fully advlssd Itbat 
it 1.a the opinion or this de~rtmnt thut your question 

should be ans?fsreQ in the ne&Htire and 1% is 80 a!umered. 

Very truly your
#### Elizabeth M. Filkins, Respondent, v. Thomas Cruice, Appellant.

Judgment reversed and a ik»w trial ordered before another referee. Opinion by

Haight, J.
---

---

Exhibit 23.8

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Forms S-8, (File No.
333-61895, File No. 333-55970) and Forms S-3, (File No. 333- 140968, File No. 333-140969
and, File No. 333-140974) of our report dated February 26, 2008, relating to the financial
statements of Hod Hasharon Sport Center Limited which appears in this Form 10-K of Ampal
 American Israel Corporation.

KPMG Somekh Chaikin
 Tel Aviv

March 13, 2008



---

---
S. 1029

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and one

An Act

To clarify the authority of the Department of Housing and Urban Development

with respect to the use of fees during fiscal year 2001 for the manufactured

housing program.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MANUFACTURED HOUSING.

(a) AVAILABILITY OF FEES.—Notwithstanding section 620(e)(2)

of the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety

Standards Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5419(e)(2)), any fees collected

under that Act, including any fees collected before the date of

enactment of the American Homeownership and Economic Opportunity Act of 2000 (12 U.S.C. 1701 note) and remaining unobligated

on the date of enactment of this Act, shall be available for expenditure to offset the expenses incurred by the Secretary under the

National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards

Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5401 et seq.), otherwise in accordance with

section 620 of that Act.

(b) DURATION.—The authority for the use of fees provided for

in subsection (a) shall remain in effect during the period beginning

in fiscal year 2001 and ending on the effective date of the first

appropriations Act referred to in section 620(e)(2) of the National

Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of

1974 (42 U.S.C. 5419(e)(2)) that is enacted with respect to a fiscal

year after fiscal year 2001.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 93 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        March 22, 2001.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 247) to amend the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 to 
authorize communities to use community development block grant funds for 
construction of tornado-safe shelters in manufactured home parks. The first 
reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to 
the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial Services. 
After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-
minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the 
purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a 
substitute printed in the Congressional Record and numbered 1 pursuant to clause 
8 of rule XVIII. That amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be 
considered as read. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman 
of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of 
whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the 
portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of 
rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. At the conclusion 
of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report 
the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member 
may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the 
Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the amendment in the nature of a 
substitute made in order as original text. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
----

(2004/C 84 E/0838)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3924/03

by Daniel Varela Suanzes-Carpegna (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(16 December 2003)

Subject:   Seaworthiness of the Geroi Sevastopolya

The Russian single-hulled vessel, the Geroi Sevastopolya, has set sail from the Latvian port of Ventspils with 55 000 tonnes of fuel similar to the kind the Prestige was carrying. According to information published in the media, the 24-year-old tanker is not in the best condition for sailing, obliging the Commission to send inspectors to Latvia, as a preventative measure, to examine its state of repair.

Given the current sensitivity in Europe over maritime safety and the damage to the marine environment:

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(16 January 2004)

The Erika and Prestige accidents highlighted the disastrous consequences that major fuel oil spills have for the environment and for coastal economies. Against this background, the Commission's attention was drawn to the case of the Russian single-hulled tanker Geroi Sevastopolya, which was due to leave the Latvian port of Ventspils bound for Singapore, carrying around 50 000 tonnes of heavy fuel oil along the coasts of Europe on its way.

At the Commission's initiative, a team of inspectors from several EU countries, coordinated by the European Maritime Safety Agency, inspected the vessel before it set sail from Ventspils. The inspectors found no grounds warranting detention of the vessel by the Latvian authorities.

It should be added that the Commission reacted very swiftly following the Prestige accident, its first proposals being designed precisely to prohibit heavy fuel oil being carried in such vessels. These measures were adopted by the Council and the European Parliament, and since 21 October 2003 no single-hulled oil tanker carrying heavy fuel oil has been allowed to enter or leave an EU port.

The Commission agrees with the Honourable Member that it is important that these measures be applied early by all the accession States, and made this point to the Ministers at the Transport Council of 5 December 2003, inviting them to the necessary steps as quickly as possible to stop allowing single-hulled vessels carrying heavy fuel oil into their ports.

As for differences in legislation between the accession countries and the current Member States, the framework legislation of the accession States is in place and it is in line with the Community acquis. However, the accession countries still need to finalise their adoption of the most recent measures, such as the ‘Erika’ I and II packages.

With more specific regard to Malta and Cyprus, the regulatory framework in these countries regarding flags is, as indicated above, not yet fully in line with the Community acquis. However, the Maltese and Cypriot flags have undertaken to step up their efforts to be removed as soon as possible from the blacklist of the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control. In accordance with Article 211 of the EC Treaty, as of 1 May 2004 the Commission will ensure that these States apply Community law properly.

----
Exhibit 32

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Gevity HR, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers
of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                       |  |                                 
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------------
|Dated:  August 6, 2004 |  | /s/ ERIK VONK                   
|                       |  | Erik VonkChief Executive Officer
|                       |  |                                 

|                       |  |                                           
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Dated:  August 6, 2004 |  | /s/ PETER C. GRABOWSKI                    
|                       |  | Peter C. GrabowskiChief Financial Officer)
|                       |  |
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.45 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### Charles F. Woerishoffer, Plaintiff, v. North River Construction Company, Defendant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.07 MB)
 
 1/7 Coalition forces 7TH MARINES cjtf-oir A&A Middle East Al Asad air base building partner capacity spmagtfcrcc Combined Joint Task Force-Operation Inherent Resolve Advise and assist Special Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force-Crisis Response-Central Command Al Anbar province USCENTCOM Iraq 1st Battalion Deployed Security Forces MARINE CORPS MARINES deployment
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### Patrick Gallagher, Respondent, *v.*Mary Gallagher, Appellant.

*Gallagher*v. Gallagher, 135 App. Div. 457, affirmed.

(Submitted May 12, 1911;

decided May 30, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 29, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to compel specific performance of an alleged agreement to convey real property.

*John J. Gleason*for appellant.

*Benjamin N. Cardozo, John H. Judge*and *Louis B. Hasbrouck*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.