alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 10.4
                                    AGREEMENT

      The undersigned reporting persons hereby agree that the statements filed
pursuant to this Schedule 13D/A, to which this Agreement is filed as an exhibit,
are filed on behalf of each of them.

Date: April 1, 2004                      ENCAP INVESTMENTS L.L.C.

                                         By: EnCap Investments L.P.,
                                                 its manager

                                         By: EnCap Investments GP, L.L.C.,
                                                 its general partner

                                         By: /s/ D. Martin Phillips
                                             --------------------------------
                                             D. Martin Phillips,
                                             Senior Managing Director

Date: April 1, 2004                      ENCAP INVESTMENTS L.P.

                                         By: EnCap Investments GP, L.L.C.,
                                             its general partner

                                         By: /s/ D. Martin Phillips
                                             --------------------------------
                                             D. Martin Phillips,
                                             Senior Managing Director

Date: April 1, 2004                      ENCAP INVESTMENTS GP, L.L.C.

                                         By: /s/ D. Martin Phillips
                                             --------------------------------
                                             D. Martin Phillips,
                                             Senior Managing Director

Date: April 1, 2004                      RNBD GP LLC

                                         By: /s/ D. Martin Phillips
                                             --------------------------------
                                             D. Martin Phillips,
                                             Senior Managing Director


Date:  April 1, 2004                     /s/ David B. Miller
                                         ------------------------------------
                                         DAVID B. MILLER


Date: April 1, 2004                      /s/ Gary R. Petersen
                                         ------------------------------------
                                         GARY R. PETERSEN


Date: April 1, 2004                      /s/ D. Martin Phillips
                                         ------------------------------------
                                         D. MARTIN PHILLIPS


Date: April 1, 2004                      /s/ Robert L. Zorich
                                         ------------------------------------
                                         ROBERT L. ZORICH
Exhibit 3(ii)



                               USOL HOLDINGS, INC.

                               AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS

                              Adopted April 2, 2001


     Effective  April 2, 2001,  the  following  amendment  to the Bylaws of USOL
Holdings, Inc. was adopted by the Board of Directors:

          Section  8.  Special  Meetings.  Special  meetings  of  the  Board  of
     Directors  for any  purpose  or  purposes  may be called at any time by the
     Chairman of the Board of Directors or the  President,  any Vice  President,
     the Secretary or any two directors.

          Notice of the time and place of a special  meeting  shall be delivered
     personally  or by telephone to each director or sent by first class mail or
     telegraph,  charges prepaid,  addressed to each director at that director's
     address as it is shown on the  records of the  corporation,  or sent by fax
     with a  corresponding  email to each  director to the fax numbers and email
     addresses  shown on the records of the  corporation.  In case the notice is
     mailed,  it shall be deposited in the United  States mail at least four (4)
     business  days  before  the  time of the  meeting.  In case the  notice  is
     delivered  personally,  or by telephone or telegram,  it shall be delivered
     personally  or by telephone or to the  telegraph  company at least four (4)
     calendar  days  before  the  time of the  meeting.  In case the  notice  is
     delivered by fax with a  corresponding  email, it shall be sent both by fax
     and email at least four (4)  calendar  days before the time of the meeting.
     Any oral notice given personally or by telephone may be communicated either
     to the  director  or to a person  at the  office of the  director  whom the
     person giving the notice has reason to believe will promptly communicate it
     to the  director.  The notice need not specify the purpose of the  meeting,
     nor need it specify the place if the meeting is to be held at the principal
     executive office of the corporation.  Attendance of a director at a special
     meeting shall  constitute a waiver of notice of such meeting except where a
     director  attends a meeting for the  express  purpose of  objecting  to the
     transaction  any  business  because the meeting if not  lawfully  called or
     convened.
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To Comcast Corporation:

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated February 17, 1995 on Comcast International Holdings, Inc. and
Subsidiaries incorporated by reference in Comcast Corporation's Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1995, into Comcast Corporation's previously filed
Registration Statements File No. 33-41440; File No. 33-63223; File No. 33-54365;
File No. 33-25105; File No. 33-56903; File No. 33-40386; File No. 33-46988; File
No. 33-57410; and File No. 33-50785. It should be noted that we have not audited
any financial statements of Comcast International Holdings, Inc. and
Subsidiaries subsequent to December 31, 1994 or performed any audit procedures
subsequent to the date of our report.



                                             /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP


Philadelphia, Pa.,
   March 1, 1996

<PAGE>

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



To Comcast Corporation:

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated October 17, 1995 on Garden State Cablevision L.P. included in
Comcast Corporation's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995, into
Comcast Corporation's previously filed Registration Statements File No.
33-41440; File No. 33-63223; File No. 33-54365; File No. 33-25105; File No.
33-56903; File No. 33-40386; File No. 33-46988; File No. 33-57410; and File No.
33-50785.




                                             /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP


Philadelphia, Pa.
   March 1, 1996
IV 

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 592

To recognize and appreciate the historical significance and the heroic human 

endeavor and sacrifice of the people of Crete during World War II 

and commend the PanCretan Association of America. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 16, 2002

Mrs. MALONEY of New York (for herself, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. 

ISRAEL, Mr. RUSH, Mr. GEKAS, Ms. WATSON of California, Mr. DOYLE, 

Mr. PAYNE, and Mr. HOLDEN) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION

To recognize and appreciate the historical significance and 

the heroic human endeavor and sacrifice of the people 

of Crete during World War II and commend the 

PanCretan Association of America.

Whereas the year 2002 marks the 61st anniversary of the heroic Battle of Crete, which took place on the Greek island 

of Crete during World War II between Nazi German 

forces and the people of Crete assisted by the Allied armies; 

Whereas the people of Crete fought tenaciously during the 

Battle of Crete, delaying for two months the Nazi German invasion of Russia; 
2

•HRES 592 IH 

Whereas this delay forced Nazi German forces to invade Russia in the face of the brutal Russian winter, changing the 

final outcome of World War II and leading to the defeat 

of fascism; 

Whereas many historians agree that the Battle of Crete was 

one of the most significant battles of World War II; 

Whereas the Battle of Crete contributed to saving the free 

world from Nazi German occupation, thus preserving democracy, freedom, and human dignity; 

Whereas the Cretan Resistance Movement was organized to 

fight the Nazi German occupation of the island of Crete; 

Whereas for 4 years, the Cretan Resistance Movement inflicted heavy casualties upon Nazi German forces, including kidnaping a heavily-guarded Nazi German General, 

setting an example for all of the people of Europe to follow; 

Whereas the people of Crete suffered savage reprisals for 

their heroic resistance when the Nazi German invaders 

randomly executed thousands of civilians and burned and 

destroyed entire communities; 

Whereas many participants in the Battle of Crete and the 

Cretan Resistance Movement later emigrated to the 

United States and became American citizens; and 

Whereas many of these citizens became members of the 

PanCretan Association of America, an organization comprised of Greek Americans with ancestry from the island 

of Crete and committed to preserving and promoting the 

rich culture and proud history of Crete: Now, therefore, 

be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—
3

•HRES 592 IH 

1 (1) observes the memory of the fallen heroes of 

2 the Battle of Crete; 

3 (2) honors the living men and women of Crete 

4 who, during World War II, fought an oppressive in5 vader to preserve the ideals of freedom, democracy, 

6 and the pursuit of happiness; and 

7 (3) commends the PanCretan Association of 

8 America for preserving and promoting the history of 

9 Crete and its people.

Æ
March 24, 2015

Mr. Christopher Weldon

President

Weldon & Associates, Inc.

dba OrlandoAerial.com

632 W. Central Ave.

Orange City, FL 32763

Dear Mr. Weldon:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your February 5, 2015 exemption request on behalf of Weldon & Associates, Inc.

(doing business as OrlandoAerial.com) into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0324), but we 

are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply 

with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, 

you must send us all of the following:

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9521.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
# Sept. 30: Military airstrikes continue against ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published Sept. 30, 2015

September 30, 2015,Release # 20150930-01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**SOUTHWEST ASIA –** On Sept. 29, coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq. In Syria, coalition military forces conducted four airstrikes using remotely piloted, bomber, and fighter aircraft. Separately in Iraq, coalition military forces conducted 26 airstrikes coordinated with and in support of the Government of Iraq using bomber, fighter, attack, fighter-attack, ground-attack, and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL targets.The following is a summary of the strikes conducted against ISIL since the last press release:**Syria**• Near Dayr Az Zawr, one airstrike destroyed two ISIL excavators.• Near Washiyah, one airstrike destroyed an ISIL excavator and damaged two other ISIL excavators.• Near Palmyra, two airstrikes destroyed two ISIL tactical vehicles.**Iraq**• Near Al Huwayjah, eight airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL staging area, 45 ISIL fighting positions, two ISIL buildings, six ISIL vehicles, an ISIL trailer, and denied ISIL terrain.• Near Bayji, two airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed two ISIL buildings, eight ISIL fighting positions, and five ISIL weapons caches.• Near Habbaniyah, two airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL heavy machine gun, nine rocket rails, and an ISIL recoilless rifle.• Near Kirkuk, three airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed 10 ISIL rocket rails, an ISIL cache, five ISIL vehicles, and an ISIL VBIED.• Near Kisik, one airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL fighting position.• Near Mosul, two airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL fighting position, an ISIL cache, and suppressed an ISIL mortar position.• Near Ramadi, three airstrikes destroyed an ISIL vehicle, two ISIL fighting positions, an ISIL obstacle belt, and denied use of an ISIL resupply point.• Near Sinjar, one airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL heavy machine gun and two ISIL fighting positions.• Near Sultan Abdallah, two airstrikes suppressed an ISIL mortar position.• Tal Afar, two airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL tactical vehicle and an ISIL vehicle.Strike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely. The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria, and the wider international community.The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Iraq include Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, Netherlands, United Kingdom, and the United States. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Syria include Australia, Bahrain, Canada, France, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and the U.S.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

Hiroak.i Nishio COMPLAINANT


### v. Commonwealth Ports Authority RESPONDENT. Docket 

### No. 16- 13-03

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the above-referenced complaint, filed 

### in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted Airport Enforcement Pro ce edings , 14 CFR Part 16 (Rule s of Practice). Pursuant to the Rules of Practice, § 16.11(a), the date by which the Director, FAA Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis will issue a Director's Determination in this matter is hereby extended to on or before April 28, 2016.



# ~r Office of Airport Compliance

and Management Analy sis Date

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIF Y that on January

# 'W**~** 2016 , I placed in the United States mail (first class , postage paid), a true copy of the Notice of Extension of Time addressed to: Hiroaki Nishio P.O. Box 5910 CHRB Saipan, MP 96950 Complainant Maryann 

### Q. Lizama Acting Executive Director Commonwealth Ports Authority Saipan Internationa l Airport P

. O

. Box 501055 Saipan, MP 96950-1055 Respondent Robert Tenorio Torres Attorney at Law P.O. Box 503758 CK Saipan, MP 96950 Counse l to the Respondent Copy to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

### Office ofAirport Compliance and Management**/:\**

Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis
Ivey Chiropractic Clinic 


) THOMAS L. IVEY, D.C., F.I.C.C 	 CENTRE POINTE PLAZA, SUITE 3 

221 6th AVE. SE 

ABERDEEN, SO 57401-5339 

PHONE: (605) 225-7414 

FAX: (605) 225-7693 

August 10, 2010 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCIID-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

,... ~. --o........;;;;;.-Bartlinore MD 21244:"'1850;-"#~ - -~- _-0-_ ~~= -.~----_~-r __ ~- --' . , 

RE: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverag~ Relating to Status 

as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Dear Sir or Madam, 

Asa health care provider, consumer, I wish to take this opportunity to 

formally commenton the interim final rule regarding health plans and ugrandfather" status 

(Document 10 IRS-201(}-001(}-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. -The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing"grandfathered" plans should 

-~--. -not~beweakened or'reauced~in~any way;-+speCifically-supportthe-position,and-det-ailea-- -~-~-----. 7 i

comments offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the 

implementation of these regulations_ 

':.. : .- .. - ... ~ : ~" . ' 

J •• : .. 

~-'. 

FELLOW - INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTORS 


MEMBER: AMERICAN CHIROPRACTIC ASSOCIATION .. ' .. - SOUTH DAKOTA CHiROPRACTORS' ASSOCIATION 


BROWN COUNTY CHIROPRACTIC SOCIETY
Order entered September 1 9 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 00182
- CR No. 05
- 16
- 00183
- CR WALDRICK BROOKS, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On App eal from the 282nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F14
- 70150
- S , F15
- 00333
- S



### O RDER By order issued on August 11 , 2016 , the Court directed the Dallas County Clerk to supplement the record within fourteen days with the tr ial court’s findings of fact on appellant’s motion for new trial. To date, the district clerk has not complied with the Court’s order.
We ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FOURTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk’ s record containing the trial court’s findings of fact on appellant’s motion for new trial.
A ppellant’s September 13, 2016 second motion to abate the appeal is GRANTED to the
extent we EXTEND the time to file appellant’s brief until THIRTY DAYS from the da te of this order. All other relief requested in appellant’s second motion is DENIED

.We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to transmit a copy of this order to Dallas County

District Clerk Felicia Pitre and to counsel for all parties.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
§ 372.231 Tacoma, WA. The zone adjacent to, and commercially a part of Tacoma, WA, within which transportation by motor vehicle, in interstate or foreign commerce, not under common control, management, or arrangement for shipment to or from points beyond such zone, is partially exempt from regulation under 49 U.S.C. 13506(b)(1), includes and is comprised of all points as follows: ( a ) The municipality of Tacoma, WA, itself;
( b ) All points within a line drawn 8 miles beyond the municipal limits of Tacoma;
( c ) Those points in Pierce County, WA, which are not within the area described in paragraph (b) of this section, but which are on Washington Highway 162 beginning at its intersection with the line described in paragraph (b) of this section, extending to and including Orting, WA, and all points within the Orting commercial zone.
( d ) All of any municipality any part of which is within the limits of the combined area defined in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, and
( e ) All of any municipality wholly surrounded, or so surrounded except for a water boundary, by the municipality of Tacoma or any other municipality included under the terms of paragraph (d) of this section.
[45 FR 66460, Oct. 7, 1980. Redesignated at 55 FR 42198, Oct. 18, 1990, as amended at 62 FR 15422, Apr. 1, 1997; 66 FR 49870, Oct. 1, 2001; 78 FR 58478, Sept. 24, 2013]
Page 1 of 1
LEG SEP 7 an1g CREC- IF 4/2-70
‘AL PRO,
PUBLICATION S SING DIVIsion
BRANCH ULATIONS As of: September 07, 2010

PUBLIC Status Paste oe

Posted: September 07, 2010

SUBMISSION Comments Duer August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0737
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information
Name: Steven Lee Groves
Address:
623 W. South St.
Clinton, IL, 61727

General Comment

File attached

Attachments

IRS-2010-0010-0737.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 9/7/2010


8/13/2010

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to
Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a4 consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

Steven Groves
Clinton, IL 61727