alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

House Calendar No. 206

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 507

[Report No. 107–619]

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 26 (legislative day, JULY 25), 2002

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported

from the Committee on Rules.

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of Friday, July 26, 2002,

6 providing for consideration or disposition of any of the fol7 lowing measures:
2

HRES 507 RH

1 (1) A conference report to accompany the bill

2 (H.R. 3009) to extend the Andean Trade Preference

3 Act, to grant additional trade benefits under that

4 Act, and for other purposes.

5 (2) A conference report to accompany the bill

6 (H.R. 3295) to establish a program to provide funds

7 to States to replace punch card voting systems, to

8 establish the Election Assistance Commission to as9 sist in the administration of Federal elections and to

10 otherwise provide assistance with the administration

11 of certain Federal election laws and programs, to es12 tablish minimum election administration standards

13 for States and units of local government with re14 sponsibility for the administration of Federal elec15 tions, and for other purposes.

16 (3) A conference report to accompany the bill

17 (H.R. 333) to amend title 11, United States Code,

18 and for other purposes.

House Calendar No. 206

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 507

[Report No. 107–619]

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII

with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

JULY 26 (legislative day, JULY 25), 2002

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
----

----

I Tiedonantoja

Komissio

----

Euron kurssi (1)

13. toukokuuta 2004

(2004/C 136/01)

1 euro == 

----

(1)

Lähde: Euroopan keskuspankin ilmoittama viitekurssi.

----

----

SIIRTOTYÖLÄISTEN SOSIAALITURVAN HALLINTOTOIMIKUNTA

Kurssit valuuttojen muuntamiseksi neuvoston asetuksen (ETY) N:o 574/72 mukaisesti

(2004/C 136/02)

Asetuksen (ETY) N:o 574/72 107 artiklan 1, 2, 3 ja 4 kohta

Viitekausi: tammikuu 2004

Soveltamiskausi: huhtikuu, toukokuu, kesäkuu 2004

----

----

HUOMAUTUS

Euroopan unionin virallisen lehden numerossa C 136 A 14. toukokuuta 2004 julkaistaan ”Viljelykasvilajien yleinen lajikeluettelo — Yhdeksäs täydennysosa 22. kokonaispainokseen” ja ”Vihanneslajien lajikkeiden yleinen luettelo — Kolmas täydennysosa 22. kokonaispainokseen”.

Euroopan unionin virallisen lehden tilaajat voivat hankkia maksuttomana saman määrän samankielisiä versioita kuin heidän tilauksensa käsittää. Tilaajia pyydetään palauttamaan oheinen tilauslomake asianmukaisesti täytettynä ja varustettuna tilaajanumerolla (tilaajanumero on jokaisen osoitelipukkeen vasemmassa reunassa ja se alkaa: O/.........). Tämä Euroopan unionin virallisen lehden numero on saatavissa maksuttomasti yhden vuoden ajan sen julkaisupäivämäärästä lähtien.

Muut kuin tilaajat voivat tilata tämän virallisen lehden miltä tahansa myyntiedustajaltamme (ks. kääntöpuoli).

Tätä virallista lehteä kuten kaikkia virallisia lehtiä (L, C, CA, CE) voi tutkia maksutta Internet-sivulla: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex

----
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Benton, Coleman and Willis 

JOHN JAY FLANNER 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 0944-96-3 PER CURIAM 

 DECEMBER 10, 1996 

BETTY HARRIS FLANNER 

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TAZEWELL COUNTY 

Donald R. Mullins, Judge 

 (Gary G. Gilliam; McAfee & Associates, P.C., 

on brief), for appellant. 

 (Robert M. Galumbeck; Dudley, Galumbeck & 

Simmons, on brief), for appellee. 

 John Jay Flanner (husband) appeals the decision of the 

circuit court awarding medical benefits and spousal support to 

Betty Harris Flanner (wife). Husband contends that the trial 

court erred in (1) awarding wife medical benefits where wife 

failed to prove constructive desertion; and (2) awarding wife 

spousal support without considering the statutory factors. Upon 

reviewing the record and briefs of the parties, we conclude that 

this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm 

the decision of the trial court. Rule 5A:27. 

 "No ruling of the trial court . . . will be considered as a 

basis for reversal unless the objection was stated together with 

the grounds therefor at the time of the ruling . . . ." Rule 

5A:18. Thus, the Court of Appeals will not consider an argument 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
 2 

on appeal which was not presented to the trial court. Jacques v. 

Commonwealth, 12 Va. App. 591, 593, 405 S.E.2d 630, 631 (1991). 

 The record contains no evidence that husband raised before 

the trial court the challenges to the payment of medical benefits 

and spousal support which he now raises on appeal. The order 

from which this appeal is taken was endorsed by husband's counsel 

"Seen and Objected to." No transcript was filed and the written 

statement of facts does not indicate that husband raised the 

arguments which form the basis for his appeal. "We cannot assume 

that appellant's objection and reasons were proffered but not 

made a part of the record." Lee v. Lee, 12 Va. App. 512, 516, 

404 S.E.2d 736, 738 (1991) (en banc). 

 Accordingly, Rule 5A:18 bars our consideration of these 

questions on appeal. Moreover, the record does not reflect any 

reason to invoke the good cause or ends of justice exceptions to 

Rule 5A:18. Therefore, the decision of the circuit court is 

summarily affirmed. 

 Affirmed.
#### Patrick H. Doherty, Appellant, *v.*Catskill Cement Company, Respondent.

*Doherty v. Catskill Cement Co.,*136 App. Div. 902, affirmed.

(Argued May 3, 1911;

decided May 19, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, *563entered January 17, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict in. an action to recover damages alleged to have been occasioned plaintiff by the maintenance of a nuisance by the defendant.

*A. T. Clearwater, Louis Marshall*and *Edwin P. Kilroe*for appellant.

*Frank H. Osborn*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
Page 1 of 1

SEP 2 an Rec -1 412-0

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS IAs of: September 02, 2010

Received: August 12, 2010
P C Status: Posted

SUBMISSION Tracking No 80b2e7/3
iComments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0639
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Robert Thomas Poane
Address:
1 Barrington Pl., Suite 108
Bel Air, MD, 21014
Email: drpoane@drpoane.com
Phone: 410-420-7676
Fax: 410-420-7677
Organization: Dr. Robert Poane

General Comment

After reading the information given to me I found it to be very confusing. If the information is
confusing how much more confusing will it be for the consumer. I support the American
Chiropractic Association and their views. I ask that their position on PPACA be considered. Thank
you for your consideration on this matter. Respectfully, Robert Poane

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 9/2/2010
# USS Stout Breaks Record As It Departs US 5th Fleet

/ Published Sept. 29, 2020

U.S. FIFTH FLEET AREA OF OPERATIONS (Sep. 28, 2020) – The guided-missile destroyer USS Stout (DDG 55) breaks a Navy record as it completes a nearly seven month deployment in the U.S.5th Fleet area of operations (AOO), Sept. 28.

As part of Destroyer Squadron Two Six under the Dwight D. Eisenhower (Ike) Carrier Strike Group, Stout remained in theater when the rest of the strike group returned home earlier this summer. 

On Sept. 26, Stout reached 208 days consecutively at sea, surpassing the Navy’s known record previously held by Ike and USS San Jacinto (CG 56) as a result of the coronavirus and operational requirements.

Stout’s high operational tempo was in support of operations under Task Force (TF) 50, TF 51/5, and Coalition Task Force (CTF) Sentinel, the operational arm of the International Maritime Security Construct (IMSC).  

“USS Stout has been instrumental in maintaining freedom of navigation in the region. Its regular presence has helped to deter potential threats and provide reassurance to the global merchant community,” said Cdre. Rob Bellfield, commander of CTF Sentinel. “I wish to thank the crew for their efforts and wish them all the best during the rest of their deployment.”

As a Sentinel ship, Stout spent 139 days in direct or associated support of the task force to ensure the free flow of commerce.  Stout provided overwatch for more than 550 vessels as they transited critical chokepoints and delivered 1,500 maritime awareness calls to regional commercial shipping.  

Under TF 50, Stout supported both the Ike and Nimitz Carrier Strike Groups, taking part in maritime security operations such as patrolling the Bab el Mandeb and Strait of Hormuz, and escorting U.S. Army logistics support vessels through the AOO.   

Under TF 51/5, the ship supported the Bataan Amphibious Ready Group as it conducted operations including island amphibious assault training and joint air and surface integration exercises. 

Stout also conducted the first-ever Mid-Deployment Voyage Repair period at sea and executed significant repairs, preservation and preventative maintenance.  

Not once during deployment did the crew fail to execute its assigned tasking to support continuous operations.

“We are extremely proud of Stout’s accomplishments in theater as they’ve been operating to ensure freedom of navigation,” said Vice Adm. Samuel Paparo, commander of U.S. Naval Forces Central Command, U.S. 5th Fleet, Combined Maritime Forces. “Under the challenges of COVID-19 and the uncertainty of regional tensions, Stout embodied their motto and prevailed with ‘Courage, Valor and Integrity.’”
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-51129

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOE ANTHONY SMITH

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:01-CR-279-3

Before KING, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Joe Anthony Smith appeals from the judgment of the district court

revoking his term of supervised release and imposing a 48-month term of

imprisonment. In an agreed judgment in a previous revocation proceeding,

Smith received a sentence of three months of imprisonment, in return for which

he and his attorney agreed to request a sentence of no less than 48 months upon

any future revocation of supervised release, no matter how minor the violation.

The agreed judgment notwithstanding, Smith’s attorney requested a sentence

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 22, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-51129

2

of less than 48 months based on what he argued was a minor violation and

changed circumstances. The district court chose to enforce the agreement and

imposed a 48-month sentence.

Smith argues that the district court’s comments indicated that it

erroneously believed that it was required to revoke his supervised release and

sentence him to 48 months of imprisonment. He contends that the district court

was not legally required to revoke his supervised release at all and that the 48-

month sentence was plainly unreasonable because his violation was minor and

because the district court believed it was required to impose the sentence. The

Government argues that the district court’s comments did not indicate that it

believed itself legally prohibited from considering a sentence of less than 48

months and that this court should enforce Smith’s agreement to request a

sentence of no less than 48 months. The Government further contends that the

48-month sentence was reasonable.

The record in Smith’s case does notindicate thatthe district court believed

itself bound by the agreement made before Smith’s first revocation; rather, the

record indicates that the district court chose to honor that agreement and impose

a 48-month sentence. See R. 2, 12. The decision to revoke Smith’s supervised

release was not an abuse of discretion, see United States v. Teran, 98 F.3d 831,

836 (5th Cir. 1996), nor was the 48-month sentence unreasonable or plainly

unreasonable. See United States v. Jones, 484 F.3d 783, 791-92 (5th Cir. 2007).

AFFIRMED.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. James McCoy, Appellant, v. Warden of City Prison, Respondent.

Order affirmed, and. writ dismissed. Opinion by Daniels, J.
Arrangement with Jason Carlson



 Exhibit 10.16 
  
 Arrangement with Jason Carlson 
  
 As an inducement for Mr. Carlson to join Semtech Corporation, the Company agreed that should Mr. Carlson’s services be terminated by the Board of Directors, he will
be granted a severance allowance equal to six months salary and benefits continuation upon signing of a non-compete agreement and a full release of all claims and obligations. Vesting of stock options would cease as of the last day that services are
actively provided to the Company.
From: MARCO203@aol.com [mailto:MARCO203@aol.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 3:30 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RE: Count Me Out

You ask for opinions . . . 

 

Do NOT count my retirement money among the 

funds you are counting on bailing out the WH's 

deficit spending. 

 

I will withdraw every penny I have saved, pay the 

tax, and contribute the rest to any political 

candidate not caught up in the arrogant, 

presumptuous insanity within Washington at the 

present time. 

 

Marco203@aol.com
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JONATHAN RODOLFO SANCHEZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-658

[ July 13, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Glenn D. Kelley, Judge; L.T. Case No. 13CF008686AMB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Peggy Natale, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina 

Jimenez-Orosa, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS680 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robert S. Kendall, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Sentex Sensing
Technology, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  March 14, 2005

/s/ Robert S. Kendall, Chief Executive Officer
--------------------------------------------------
Signature & Title


                                       18
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 183 (Friday, September 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54003-54007]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4656]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 07-19]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 07-19 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: September 13, 2007.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 54004]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE07.050


[[Page 54005]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE07.051


[[Page 54006]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE07.052


[[Page 54007]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE07.053

[FR Doc. 07-4656 Filed 9-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,503                   3,503
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  103,343                 103,343
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (6,100)                 (6,100)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,721                 111,721
<PP&E>                                          96,730                  96,730
<DEPRECIATION>                                (23,013)                (23,013)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 280,611                 280,611
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         (63,095)                (63,095)
<BONDS>                                      (114,707)               (114,707)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           119                     119
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,259                 102,259
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   102,378                 102,378
<SALES>                                        194,267                  98,042
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               194,267                  98,042
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                (207,300)               (110,918)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (5,408)                 (2,910)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,538)                (15,357)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,797                   5,863
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,305)                 (9,552)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,305)                 (9,552)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.95)                   (.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.95)                   (.80)



</TABLE>