JAMES P. HOPKINS, D.C. 

p.o. Box 514 10,2010 708 S. State Rd. 57 

Washington, IN 47501 "-11.1'-'''' ofConsumer Infonnation and Insuranee-9versight . . Department ofHealth and Human S~~8S'e: (812) 254-8925 

Attention: OCII0-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 


Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 


Re: Interim Final Ru1e for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Below are our comments regarding the Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health 

___Jnsurance.Coverage Relating to Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the-Patient. - - ­

Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). 

We believe that every effort should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by 

PP ACA, especially as of January 1, 2014 when most ofthe refonn components (InsuranGe 

Exchanges, Subsidies, Tax Credits, etc.) come into play. 

The Rule provides the seven triggers that wou1d revoke the grandfathered status of a group 

health plan: 

• Mergers or acquisitions with the sole intention ofmaintaining grandfather status 

• Elimination of substantially all benefits to treat a particular condition 

• Elimination of benefits for any element necessary to eliminate or diagnose a condition 

• Any change to coinsurance level 

• Fixed-amount cost-sharing (Deductible slOOP) Inflation + 15% 

• Co-payments (Medical Inflation +15% or $5 adjusted for medical inflation) 

• Employer contribution (> 5% reduction in Employer Contribution) 

Whjle]elatively sp"ai@tforward, the~e gyi4,.elines may still reslJlt in~sQ.l!1e confusion tp the , 

=- ."""" 	 -maiketplaC~ i~ thei'r-applI~ti;n.For exaffipf~~ifan~~p1~yer fais~d the copayment level beyond 

the maximum in one area (i.e. outpatient services) but retained the copayment level for primary 

care doctor visits, does that mean a loss of grandfather status? Clarity will be critical both for the 

employer and the employee. 

The average consumer has a broad definition of "benefits." Consumers view their health plan 

beyond the covered benefits, cost sharing, and the contribution levels associated with the plan. 

Other components ofhealth care services can have a significant impact on the individual 

employee, which can resUlt in a change to their plan including: 

• 	 A "substantial change" to the provider network 

Consumers believe their provider and the provider network associated with any plan is an 

integral part ofthe health care benefits provided by the employer. A tennination of a 
hospital system o~ specific provider ~oup sometimes has significant impact on the 

e~plo~ee populatIOn and should be vIewed as a substantial change to the plan itself. As a 

guIdeline, we would ~uggest ~y change in the provider network impacting over 50% of'­

the employee populatIOn (nationally or locally) should result in a loss of the grandfather " 

status. 

• 	

Even 

insured 

Change 

ifthe 

to 

in 

self-funded) 

issuer 

benefit 

or 

structure 

third-party 

ofa 

administrator 

group health plan 

(TP A) 

remains 

(including 

largely 

moving 

the same, 

from fullya change in 

administration ofthe plan requires new communication, new processes, and new 

requirements on the part ofan employee and the employer. Moving from a fully-insured 

,-- - "t~~ se~f-funded,s~tusorchangingadministrators requires new pr9cesg~ ~d leggll .. 

agreementS Tor the group healtli plan.-These transitionS are not daily or regular events and 

should be considered a change in the group health plan. 

• 	 Significant change in care management/authorization requirements 

The processes consumers need to follow to receive care are a significant component of 

their perceptions oftheir health benefits plan. Changing notification requirements, 

requiring referrals, or other care management strategies involved in the delivery of care 

should also be considered as a change to the plan. This may prevent group health plans 

from maintaining their grandfather status by not necessarily eliminating a benefit, but 

making it difficult to receive by changing the care management process around it. 

Even by the most optimistic estimates, a substantial portion ofthe employee population will 

remain outside the PPACA as of January 2014 based on the current rules. While we understand 

the difficulty involved in making changes, creating another large sub-population of excluded I 

individuals will only add to costs, increase confusion, and mitigate the potential impact of the I 

legislation. This only adds to the uncertainty surrounding the $143 billion in deficit reduction 

I projected by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) when the process began. .1 

l~.· --: .-----We-beUeve-that-.an-y-;oCh.anges:;,r-elated"te~the._areas·'listed~abev_e~sh.ould-alse.resutt-'in:·$I()ss,Gt----~ -I 

grandfather status as these are changes that heavily impact a patient's healthcare benefits. The 

Rule needs to be clear, reasonable, and with no ambiguities involved in determining whether a 

group health plan is "in or out." The decisions we make today will determine the outcomes for 

tomorrow. We may need to make some difficult decisions to create a sustainable health care 

system that will support a growing economy in the future. That means getting as many citizens 

across the country participating at the beginning to make it work and delivering on its promises 

to retain their support. 

you for ~/prty to comment on this regulation. 

~ II/f~J:g:: ames P. Hopkins, D.C. 

Hopkins Chiropractic Center