alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11

                          Statement Re:  Computation of Per Share Earnings

[CAPTION]
<TABLE>



                                           Three Months Ended         Nine Months Ended
                                                September                 September
                                          ---------   ---------    ----------  ----------
                                            1999        1998          1999        1998
                                          ---------   ---------    ----------  ----------
<S>                                       <C>         <C>          <C>         <C>
Basic:
    Average shares outstanding:           1,767,064   1,767,064     1,767,064   1,767,064

    Net effect of the assumed exercise
    of stock options-based on the
    treasury stock method using
    average stock prices                          0           0             0           0
                                          ---------   ---------    ----------  ----------
             Total                        1,767,064   1,767,064     1,767,064   1,767,064
                                          =========   =========    ==========  ==========
Net income                                 $579,898    $598,553    $1,742,381  $1,738,125
                                          =========   =========    ==========  ==========
Net income per share                          $0.33       $0.34         $0.99       $0.98
                                          =========   =========    ==========  ==========




Diluted:
    Average shares outstanding:           1,767,064   1,767,064     1,767,064   1,767,064

    Net effect of the assumed exercise
    of stock options based on the
    treasury stock method using
    average market  price or period
    end market price, whichever is higher       862       2,420           254       2,125
                                          ---------   ---------    ----------  ----------
             Total                        1,767,926   1,769,484     1,767,318   1,769,189
                                          =========   =========    ==========  ==========
Net income                                 $579,898    $598,553    $1,742,381  $1,738,125
                                          =========   =========    ==========  ==========
Net income per share                          $0.33       $0.34         $0.99       $0.98
                                          =========   =========    ==========  ==========

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
#### Mary Jane Peck, as Executrix and Devisee under the Will of Jesse Peck, Deceased. Appellant, v. David Cady Smith, as Executor, etc., of Eliza Peck, Deceased, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Mem. by

Bockes, J.;

Landon, J.. not acting.
CENTCOM Commander General James N. Mattis visits Lebanon
 By None  , U.S. Embassy, Beirut, Lebanon
  BEIRUT (Nov. 19, 2010) — U.S. Central Command Commander General James N. Mattis made his first visit to Beirut, Lebanon today and met with Lebanon’s senior government leadership.  During his visit, Gen. Mattis met with President Michel Sleiman, Minister of Defense Elias Murr, and Lebanese Armed Forces Commander Lieutenant General Jean Kahwagi. He also met with the U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon, Ambassador Maura Connelly, and embassy staff.  Upon his departure, Gen Mattis provided the following statement:  General Mattis thanked President Sleiman, Minister Murr, and General Kahwagi for their courtesy and hospitality during his visit to Lebanon today. He gained a deep appreciation of the views and perspectives of these senior leaders.  General Mattis came to Lebanon to reiterate to the Lebanese people, the Lebanese Armed Forces and the Government of Lebanon the U.S. government’s position that the United   States is committed to the continuity of CENTCOM’s relationship with the LAF and to supporting legitimate institutions of the Lebanese state. As General Mattis discussed with the President, the Minister of Defense and General Kahwagi, U.S. support for the Lebanese Armed Forces is a key aspect of our wide-ranging support to the Government of Lebanon. General Mattis was also pleased that the U.S. Congress recently reaffirmed its commitment to security assistance to Lebanon. President Obama continues to believe that U.S. support to the LAF is part of an international commitment to enable the Lebanese Government to exercise its sovereignty and authority over all of its Territory in accordance UNSCRs 1559 and 1701.  As Ambassador Connelly has said, the U.S. believes its assistance to the LAF contributes to improving regional stability and is clearly in the interests of the Lebanese people of the United   States. General Mattis pledged to continue to support training and engagement assistance to the LAF in order to build greater military capacity and deepen our relationship.  The U.S. has provided $720 million in security assistance since 2005 to equip and train the LAF as tangible evidence of the UnitedState’s commitment to Lebanon. The U.S. government believes our assistance to Lebanon has served to deepen our partnership and help ensure the viability of the institutions that will serve as the guarantors of Lebanon’s future. A strong, sovereign, stable Lebanon is in everyone’s interest - - the Lebanese people, the region, the United States and the international community as a whole.
#### ATLANTIC TRANSPORT CO. OF WEST VIRGINIA v. STATE OF MARYLAND, to Use of SZCZESEK.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

February 20, 1912.)

No. 1,059.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.

Ralph Robinson and Edward Duffy (Nicholas P. Bond, on the brief), for appellant.

John E. Semmes, Jr. (John E. Semmes and Jesse N. Bowen, on the brief), for appellee.

Before GOFF and PRITCHARD, Circuit Judges, and DAYTON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the record of this cause. We refer to tho opinion of the learned judge below, who entered the decree complained of, which fully accords with the views of this court. 190 Fed. 210. Affirmed.
#### Jacob J. Banta, Appellant, v. James Naughton and others, Respondents.

Decision modified, as directed in opinion, with costs to abide event. Opinion by Daniels, J.
# Statement from the CENTCOM Commander regarding IRGC attempt to seize U.S. unmanned vessel

/ Published Aug. 30, 2022

Aug. 30, 2022

Release Number 20220830-05

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla. –** Gen. Michael “Erik” Kurilla, Commander, U.S. Central Command statement on Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ illegal attempted seizure of U.S. unmanned vessel in the Arabian Gulf Aug. 29, 2022:

"The professionalism and competence of the crew of the USS Thunderbolt prevented Iran from this illegal action. This incident once again demonstrates Iran's continued destabilizing, illegal, and unprofessional activity in the Middle East."

-30-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited condensed balance sheet and unaudited condensed statement of
operations and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         621,341
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  251,026
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,041,351
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,946,380
<PP&E>                                         923,106
<DEPRECIATION>                               (346,551)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,124,031
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,830,284
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          2
<COMMON>                                         4,904
<OTHER-SE>                                   (427,903)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,124,031
<SALES>                                        301,639
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,373,068
<CGS>                                          526,975
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,516,119
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,583
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (632,579)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (632,579)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (632,579)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)


</TABLE>
IV 

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 531

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to permit Members 

to characterize action in the Senate in the same manner that they 

may characterize action in the House. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2002

Mr. ROHRABACHER (for himself and Mr. FRANK) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

permit Members to characterize action in the Senate 

in the same manner that they may characterize action 

in the House.

1 Resolved, That paragraph (b) of clause 1 of rule XVII 

2 of the Rules of the House of Representatives is amended 

3 to read as follows: 

4 ‘‘(b) Remarks in debate, including references to the 

5 Senate or its Members, shall be confined to the question 

6 under debate, avoiding personality.’’.

Æ
SERVED OCTOBER 14, 2011 

;GPARTMENTOF 

U.S. DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATION'i0^r!?V?r&L^^^^^ 

OFFICE O F HEARING S ' ''-"^ '-"-"•^'"-''^=^ 

WASHINGTON , D C ?m oc m p I: LiLi 

In The Matter Of: 

BRUCE ALLARD 

QUINBY 

Respondent. 

FAA Docket No. CP08SO0005 

FDMS No. FAA-2008-0241 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

On October 13, 2011 the Complainant, the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA), filed a Withdrawal of Complaint with the Office of Hearings. The Withdrawal of 

Complaint stated that the parties had reached a settlement, and requested an order 

dismissing the proceedings. 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §215, this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. 

IE. Sullivai 

rmistrative Law Judge 

Attachment: Service List 
FDMS NO. FAA-2008-0241 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL 4& ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, ACiC^30 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1OOO' 

ONE COPY 

Bruce Quinby, Respondent 

197 Tanglewood Ln. 

Kingston, TN 37763 

TEL: 865-717-1210 

Gerald A. Ellis, Comj}lainant '•> Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, ASO-7 

Southern Region 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

TEL: • 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable J. E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk. AGC-430. 

- 2 -
#### § 551.63 May a foreign manufacturer submit a designation by email or facsimile?

No, the statute requires designation documents submitted by foreign manufacturers to contain original ink signatures. NHTSA will reject designation documents submitted via email or facsimile, as they do not satisfy this requirement.
From: Larson, Mary Jo [mailto:mlarson@wnj.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 9:09 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Public Hearing on Definition of Fiduciary

I am an ERISA attorney primarily representing employers who are plan sponsors.  I just wanted

to say that I couldn't agree more with your approach on the definition of fiduciary.  I can't tell

you how many of my clients have relied completely on the advice of brokers and other advisers

who have clearly not had their employees' best interests at heart.  They think they are getting

the expert financial help that they need and are shocked when their adviser, upon being

pressed, disclaims any actual responsibility for the decisions made, and even more shocked

when they see what a bad deal they got.  It's been very frustrating for me for many years.

Mary Jo Larson 

Warner Norcross & Judd LLP

2000 Town Center 

Suite 2700 

Southfield, MI 48075-1318

Web www.wnj.com

Direct 248.784.5183 

Fax 248.603.9783 

Email mlarson@wnj.com

Best Lawyers in America

Top 100, Michigan Super Lawyers  

Leading Lawyers, Chambers

Notice: This e-mail message and any attachments are solely for the confidential use of 

the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read this 

message or any attachments, and please do not distribute or act in reliance on this 

message. If you have received this message by mistake, please notify us immediately 

by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and any attachments from your 

computer system. The attorney-client and work product privileges are not waived by the 

transmission of this message. 

The United States Treasury Department has established rules regarding tax advice. 

We inform you here that any tax advice contained in this communication (including any 

attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose 

of avoiding tax-related penalties or promoting, marketing, or recommending to another 

person any transaction or matter addressed in this communication. If you would like tax 

advice upon which you can rely to avoid tax-related penalties, or that you can use in 

promoting a particular transaction to other persons, please contact us so that we may 

discuss the requirements the Treasury Department imposes upon that advice.
AUG 1 8 2010 

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 


PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS 


PUBLIC BRANCH 

Page 1 of 1 

'K£C-- ))y-l/J2-/0 

As of: August 18, 2010 

Received: August 09, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 18, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2c5fO SUBMISSION 
 Comments Due: August 16, 2010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0144 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

-------------------------------------------------------------.... 


Submitter Information 

Name: Kenneth Edward Reckelhoff 

Address: 

1851 Schoettler Rd 

Chesterfield, MO, 63006 

Organization: Logan College of Chiropractic 

Government Agency Type: Federal 

-------------------------------------------------------------.... 


General Comment 

See attached file(s) 

-------------------------------------------------------------.... 


Attachments 

IRS-2010-0010-0144.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

http://fdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency/componentlsubmitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/18/2010 
August 9, 2010 

Office ofConsumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department ofHealth and Human Services 

Attention: OCII 0-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-20 1 0­

0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part ofthe new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number ofindividuals covered by the Patient Protection ar,d 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these 

regulations. 

Kenneth E. Reckelhoff, D.C.
Exhibit 21.4

Peco Energy Company Subsidiary Listing



|                                      |  |                         
|------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|Affiliate                             |  | Jurisdiction ofFormation
|Adwin (Schuylkill) Cogeneration, Inc. |  | Pennsylvania            
|Adwin Realty Company                  |  | Pennsylvania            
|Ambassador II Joint Venture           |  | Pennsylvania            
|ATNP Finance Company                  |  | Delaware                
|ExTel Corporation, LLC                |  | Delaware                
|Horizon Energy Company                |  | Pennsylvania            
|PEC Financial Services, LLC           |  | Pennsylvania            
|PECO Energy Capital Corp.             |  | Delaware                
|PECO Energy Capital Trust III         |  | Delaware                
|PECO Energy Capital Trust IV          |  | Delaware                
|PECO Energy Capital Trust V           |  | Delaware                
|PECO Energy Capital Trust VI          |  | Delaware                
|PECO Energy Capital, LP               |  | Delaware                
|PECO Energy Transition Trust          |  | Delaware                
|PECO Wireless, LP                     |  | Delaware
#### Henry Day, Respondent, v. Albert Palmer Company, Appellant. Same v. Cornelia Palmer, Appellant.

Order reversed, and motion granted, without prejudice to a motion on the part of plaintiff, after the return of the commission for its suppression, without costs to either party. Opinion *Per Uuriam.*
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Brigham Exploration Company
      (the"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Ben M.Brigham, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
      of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.











Dated: 
                November 4, 2005
            /s/
                BEN M. BRIGHAMBen
                M. BrighamChief
                Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the
                Board











This
      certification shall not be deemed to be "filed" for the purpose of Section
      18 of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated
      by
      reference into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act of
      1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated
      therein by reference.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Brigham Exploration Company and will be
      retained by Brigham Exploration Company and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION f FE S4/Q-/ 6 Ae 1

PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS
BRANCH

Page I of 1

PUBLIC Status: Posted

SUBMISSION comments Due: August 16,

7 2010
As of: August 16, 2010
Posted: August 16, 2010

2010)
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001

Group Health Plans and Heaith Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0090
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Karen L Girard
Address:

23 Parmenter Rd

Hudson, MA, 01749

General Comment
See attached file(s)
Attachments
IRS-2010-0010-0090.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488
http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/16/2010


August 9, 2010

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991—IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Fina) Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to
Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

Karen Girard