alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.27 MB)
 
 Logistical Support Vessel U.S. Army USARCENT Kuwait Camp Arifjan ship U.S. Army Central maritime ARCENT Kuwait Naval Base Warriors Wanted ARCENT Warrior Faces LSV-5 Army Maritime Service
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: dean tubman [mailto:wherediddeango@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 11:14 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: No Thanks

No thank you. I am managing my money just fine. The federal government is not very 

efficient at spendy taxpayer money that it currently recieves. People should be able to 

control their retirement savings not the government. The government needs to be 

responsible in paying down federal debt not looking to use retirement m to finance debt.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000022099
<NAME> THE COLUMBIA GAS SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
<SUBSIDIARY>
   <NUMBER> 1
   <NAME> CGS
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    3,649,900
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    459,700
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,435,900
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        49,000
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 610,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,004,600
<COMMON>                                       552,600
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      763,200
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            259,300
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,553,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         2,003,800
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      900
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                      2,400
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               2,447,200
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                6,004,600
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    3,356,000
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           115,900
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   2,875,800
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   2,875,800
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        478,200
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              26,100
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 504,300
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       166,800
<NET-INCOME>                                   221,600
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  221,600
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           060
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         462,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.11
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 552 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 219
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 552

                          [Report No. 107-696]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
  bill (H.R. 2215) to authorize appropriations for the Department of 
         Justice for fiscal year 2002, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 2002

    Ms. Pryce, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
  bill (H.R. 2215) to authorize appropriations for the Department of 
         Justice for fiscal year 2002, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
2215) to authorize appropriations for the Department of Justice for 
fiscal year 2002, and for other purposes. All points of order against 
the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The 
conference report shall be considered as read.

                                                 House Calendar No. 219

107th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 552

                          [Report No. 107-696]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
  bill (H.R. 2215) to authorize appropriations for the Department of 
         Justice for fiscal year 2002, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 25, 2002

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Docket: EBSA-2008-0011 

Investment Advice—Participants and Beneficiaries 

Comment On: EBSA-2008-0011-0054 

Investment Advice - Participants and Beneficiaries 

Document: EBSA-2008-0011-DRAFT-0074 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: Jim Rogers 

Address: 

2035 Medford Rd 

2003 

Ann Arbor, MI, 48104 

Email: jim.t.rogers@thomson.com 

General Comment 

Since my company does not take an active involvement in minimizing the amount the 3rd party plan 

managers can take off the invested amounts, and their ability to reward themselves in spite of negative 

trends, it seems prudent that the potential rule changes be enacted/enforced. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: April 19, 2010 

Received: April 19, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80adb011 

Comments Due: May 05, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=Print&PrintId=0900006480adb0... 4/19/2010
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 22.1



                        SUBSIDIARIES OF ZITEL CORPORATION



1.   Zitel International Corporation
     47211 Bayside Parkway
     Fremont, CA  94538-6517

2.   Zitel International (Luxembourg) S.A.
     47211 Bayside Parkway
     Fremont, CA  94538-6517

3.   Zitel Export Corporation
     47211 Bayside Parkway
     Fremont, CA  94538-6517

4.   Datametrics Systems Corporation
     47211 Bayside Parkway
     Fremont, CA  94538-6517

5.   Datametrics Systems Limited
     47211 Bayside Parkway
     Fremont, CA  94538-6517

6.   Datametrics Systems Nederland B.V.
     47211 Bayside Parkway
     Fremont, CA  94538-6517








                                     Page 62
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Heritage Worldwide,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






Date:  February 12, 2006                                 /s/ Claude Couty
                                                         ----------------
                                                         Claude Couty
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                                         and General Manager
---------------------------------------------------------------------

AUG 1 8 2010 


Page 1 of2

'~ "£ &., II rtf I ). -/0 

,LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 

PUBLICATION&, REOULATIONS As of: August 18, 2010 BRANCH Received: August 09, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 18, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2c610 

PUBLIC 


SUBMISSION 
 Comments Due: August 16, :2010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-201O-0010-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0159 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

-----------------------------------------------------------------,---­

Submitter Information 

Name: Brian Flournoy 

Address: 

Tulsa, OK, 

Submitter's Representative: John Sullivan 

Organization: Performance Care Clinic 

Government Agency Type: State 

General Comment 

August 9, 2010 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status 

as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-2010­

0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

http://fdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency IcomponentlsubmitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8118/2010 
Page 2 of2 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 


be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed commen'~s 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these 


regulations. 


Regards, 


Brian Flournoy 


http://fdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency/componentlsubmitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/18/2010
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 40593 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JOSE SAUL MARRAQUIN ORELLANA, also known as Artemio Montejo

Cruz , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12

- CR

- 204

- 1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Saul Marraquin Orellana (Marraquin) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Marraquin h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 17, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-40593 Document: 00513384357 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016No. 15

- 40593

2 record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-40593 Document: 00513384357 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000020290
<NAME> CARYL WEST
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    3,762,826
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         500,447
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       536,224
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 117,121
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,916,618
<COMMON>                                       762,136
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      562,851
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            334,178
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,659,165
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     20,686
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,205,916
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             234,702
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   60,360
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,735,789
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                4,916,618
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    2,550,874
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           143,676
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   2,071,405
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   2,215,081
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        335,793
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             (2,480)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 333,313
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        99,737
<NET-INCOME>                                   233,576
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        856
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  232,720
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     (250,100)
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       95,611
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         483,366
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 494

Honoring the United States Youth Soccer National Championships at the

Maryland SoccerPlex in Germantown, Maryland.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 18, 2002

Mrs. MORELLA (for herself, Mr. EHRLICH, Mr. GILCHREST, Mr. TOM DAVIS

of Virginia, Mr. WOLF, Mr. BOEHLERT, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, and Mr.

WYNN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Honoring the United States Youth Soccer National Championships at the Maryland SoccerPlex in Germantown,

Maryland.

Whereas nearly 14,000,000 children play soccer in this country every year, making it the most popular youth team

sport in country;

Whereas United States Youth Soccer is the largest organized

soccer organization for youth, with over 3,200,000 registered players;

Whereas the Maryland SoccerPlex is a state-of-the-art, 24-

field, soccer complex in Germantown, Maryland and is

home of the National Championships in 2002 and 2003;
2

•HRES 494 IH

Whereas approximately 1000 teams entered the national competition, representing all 50 states divided into four regions of the country, with the final 48 teams to be competing at the Maryland SoccerPlex on July 23–28;

Whereas a total of 864 players and 192 coaches and administrators will compete at the National Championships;

Whereas the National Champions will be crowned in 12 different divisions, with boys and girls competing in Under14 through Under-19 age groups;

Whereas the United States Soccer Federation initiated the

youth championships in 1935 with what is now known as

the James P. McGuire Cup (for U–19 Boys), and since

its creation in 1974, United States Youth Soccer has

added 11 additional divisions to the Youth Championship

Tournament, with the U–14 and U–15 boys and girls

championships being the most recently added in 2001;

and

Whereas the Bethesda Eclipse, the Bethesda Fury, the Bethesda Alliance, and the ’88 Bays, all teams from the

great State of Maryland, will compete in the Championships: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors

2 the outstanding accomplishments of the participants and

3 organizers of the 2002 United States Youth Soccer Na4 tional Championships at the Maryland SoccerPlex in Ger5 mantown, Maryland.

Æ
SUPREME COURT.

#### Sally J. Mayer *et al.*agt. John G. Noll *et al.*

*Examination of parties before tidal—on whom, order for, must be*served— *Code of Civil Procedure, seciwns*870-873.

An order for the examination of an adverse party as a witness before the trial of the action, under sections 870-873 of the Code of Civil Procedure, must be served upon the party to be examined as well as upon his attorney. Service upon the attorney alone will not authorize an attachment against the party, nor an order striking out his pleading.'

*General Term, First Department,*

*November, 1878.*

*On*the 13th of May, 1878, the plaintiffs obtained an order, under sections 870-873 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for the examination of the defendants as witnesses before the trial of the action. The order directed that service be made upon the parties to be examined or upon their attorney. Service was made upon the attorney alone. The defendants, who resided at Port Wayne, Indiana, failed to appear for examination at the appointed time and place. The plaintiffs, thereupon, applied for an order striking out the defendants’ answer as a-punishment for their failure to appear. Upon the argument, which was had at special term before Daniels, J., the defendants’ counsel objected, that the service of the order for examination was incomplete and that it should have been served upon the parties to be examined as well as upon their attorney, as had been held in *Riddle*agt. *Gram*(5 *Weekly Dig.,*277). The objection was overruled and the defendants’ answer was stricken out, unless within five days the defend*215ants consented to appear and submit to an examination under the original order theretofore made. The defendants declined to give such consent and appealed.

Note.—A ruling to the same effect was made by the Saratoga special term of the supreme court (7 *Weekly Digest,*312), in which judge Bocees *(onp.*314) says: “ Without further elaboration of this subject here I will remark that I have carefully considered the case of *Biddle*agt. *Oram*(5 *Weekly Dig.,*277) and am entirely satisfied with the line of reasoning there adopted.” [Rep.

*John E.*Brodsky, for appellant, cited and relied upon *Biddle*agt. *Qram*(5 *Weekly*Digest, 277).

*Ira Leo*Bamberger, for respondent.

The general term reversed the order of the special term upon the ground that the service of the order for examination upon the attorney alone was not sufficient to warrant the order striking out the defendants’ answer. No written opinion was filed.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 9/19/15 

Received: September 19, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8l7q-686p

Comments Due: September 24, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule- Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-5298

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Harry Shaffer

Address: 

55 howard ave

lynnfield, MA, 01940

Email: harryls@verizon.net

Phone: 781 334 5799

General Comment

Do not change the current use of Options in IRAs. It is very useful to those that know how to use 

them and the others don't touch them. 

sincerely

Harry Shaffer
§ 557.4 Requirements for petition. A petition filed under this part should be addressed and submitted to: Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590. Each petition filed under this part must— ( a ) Be written in the English or Spanish language;
( b ) Have, preceding its text, the word “Petition”;
( c ) Contain a brief statement concerning the alleged failure of a manufacturer to meet reasonably his obligation to notify or remedy;
( d ) Contain a brief summary of the data, views, or arguments that the petitioner wishes to present in a hearing on whether or not a manufacturer has reasonably met his obligations to notify or remedy;
( e ) Specifically request a hearing.