alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PETITION TO: SECRETARY THOMAS E. PEREZ, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Millions of Americans like me are counting on our 401(k) plans and individual retirement accounts for a secure
financial future — and we’ve worked hard to build and grow our savings. These plans often involve complex
financial decisions, so many of us have to use investment professionals for guidance. Loopholes in the current
law make it easy for some on Wall Street to take advantage of hardworking Americans and line their own
pockets with our retirement savings. Last year alone, hidden fees, unfair risk, and bad investment advice
reduced Americans’ retirement savings by as much as $17 billion. It’s time to close this loophole and ensure a
high standard that holds anyone who gives financial advice genuinely accountable for helping us choose the best
investments. As one of your constituents, I’m counting on you to work to close the loophole now.

po We BAL eco — sincowy, :
Hie f sree pn (GRE FORT 13 «
Raymond Bates

HLOLSSDLFY 1401222104 Kingston, NY 12401-6915
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         August 31, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on August 22, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 6 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2023-237, CP2023-240.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-18790 Filed 8-30-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         August 24, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on August 14, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add First-Class Package Service & Parcel Select Service Contract 7 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2023-228, CP2023-231.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-18210 Filed 8-23-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 

 
  
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
ACCOUNTANTS 
  
 We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement of Groupe Danone on Form S-8 (No 333–100334) of our report dated March
9, 2004, relating to the Consolidated Financial Statements which appear in Groupe Danone’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003. 
  

PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit 
  
 Paris, France 
 April 2, 2004
2 February 1999



Mr. Daniel Goldman
Shore Capital & Corporate Ltd
One Maddox Street

LONDON
W1R 9WA

Dear Daniel

Further to our discussions last week, I would like to confirm the following:

The company  will hold  bi-monthly  board  meetings  this year. I would like the
first  meeting  to be held in the  middle  of March.  This will  enable a set of
meaningful  management  accounts to be distributed prior to the meeting together
with a brief from me. I will contact you to arrange a date.

Remuneration  for your services would be as we agreed,  namely  (pound)5,000 and
5,000 shares in Invu Inc. The  (pound)5,000  is payable in 6 equal  installments
throughout  the year.  As a  consequence  of Colorado Law it is not possible for
shares to be issued to any party for services which have not yet been performed.
Therefore,  I suggest that the shares are in consideration of corporate  finance
services to be performed over the next, say, three months,  and issued to you at
that time.

I have  received  information  from  Jenkens & Gilchrist  in the form of a draft
questionnaire. If you have any questions or comments, please let me know.

I hope  this  is  satisfactory.  If you  would  send me a note  signifying  this
together with the questionnaire, I will organize the appropriate documentation.

Yours sincerely,

/s/ David Morgan

DAVID MORGAN

Chief Executive

/s/ Daniel Goldman
10th February 1999
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 352

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3341) to provide a short-term

enhanced safety net for Americans losing their jobs and to provide

our Nation’s economy with a necessary boost.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 27, 2002

Mr. ISRAEL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3341) to provide

a short-term enhanced safety net for Americans losing

their jobs and to provide our Nation’s economy with

a necessary boost.

1 Resolved, That immediately upon adoption of this res2 olution the Speaker shall, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

3 XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of

4 the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 3341) to provide a short-term en6 hanced safety net for Americans losing their jobs and to

7 provide our Nation’s economy with a necessary boost. The

8 first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points
2

HRES 352 IH

1 of order against consideration of the bill are waived. Gen2 eral debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not ex3 ceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair4 man and ranking minority member of the Committee on

5 Ways and Means. After general debate the bill shall be

6 considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The

7 bill shall be considered by title rather than by section.

8 Each title shall be considered as read. Before the consider9 ation of any other amendment to the bill, it shall be in

10 order to consider and dispose of an amendment to strike

11 title III. Such amendment shall not be subject to debate.

12 During consideration of the bill for further amendment,

13 the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord

14 priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member

15 offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the

16 portion of the Congressional Record designated for that

17 purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed

18 shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of consider19 ation of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise

20 and report the bill to the House with such amendments

21 as may have been adopted. The previous question shall

22 be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments

23 thereto to final passage without intervening motion except

24 one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
3

HRES 352 IH

1 SEC. 2. If the Committee of the Whole rises and re2 ports that it has come to no resolution on the bill, then

3 on the next legislative day the House shall, immediately

4 after the third daily order of business under clause 1 of

5 rule XIV, resolve into the Committee of the Whole for fur6 ther consideration of the bill.

Æ
Violence in Iraq at lowest level in six years
 By John J. Kruzel , American Forces Press Service
  
 WASHINGTON (Feb. 23, 2009) – Violent attacks in Iraq are at their lowest levels since August 2003, a U.S. commander in Iraq said Sunday. Army Maj. Gen. David Perkins, director for strategic effects with Multi-National Force - Iraq, told reporters in Baghdad the downtick in violence marks a 90-percent decrease since the surge of U.S. troops began in 2007. Perkins added that on Feb. 20, no Iraqi civilians were killed or even targeted in attacks. “This is a very significant event, and we are seeing more and more days like that throughout Iraq,” he said. Contributing to the improved security are the growing Iraqi security forces, which have increased the size of their ranks from 463,000 last year to 618,000 now – a 25-percent boost. “It’s not only an increase in the size and numbers, but the capability such as planning, orchestrating these very complicated operations, and then leading throughout the country of Iraq,” Perkins said. He added that Iraqi forces led and planned security for the countrywide provincial elections last month, in which some 7 million Iraqis participated in balloting that featured 14,000 registered candidates. “On election day this year, there were no attacks which resulted in any disruption to any of the voting that went on,” Perkins said. “This is in comparison to the last national election period in 2005, where we had hundreds of attacks on election day, with 44 deaths.” Election results are being widely accepted by victors and vanquished alike, he said. “If you take a look at emerging democracies, historically, it is generally the second election that is sometimes more difficult than the first election,” the general said. “By the time the second election comes, those who may have to lose power or give up power are not necessarily as excited about doing that. “But the fact that we’ve had this second election and a very large number of people participating, both as candidates and as voters,” he continued, “shows the enthusiasm that Iraqis have for the democratic process here in Iraq.” The downturn in violence comes as U.S. forces begin transferring a greater share of power to Iraqi forces in keeping with the status-of-forces agreement that became effective Jan. 1. The agreement between Washington and Baghdad stipulates that American combat forces pull back from cities and villages to major bases by June 30. “There is no doubt that we will be out of the cities by June, and we are working this day by day,” Perkins said. “And you can see many of these facilities we have already transferred, as well as the upcoming ones, are part of this plan to move out of the cities.”
Page 1 of 1

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION =f (-7)- LAC)
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS ALG BURM

AUG 17 2010

As of: August 16, 2010

PUBLIC Statuse Posted

SUBMISSION pe arc a
Comments Due: August 16, 2010)

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0091
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Susan J Cunningham
Address:
Pacific, MO, 63069
Submitter's Representative: Blaine Leutkemeyer
Organi 3

General Comment

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these:
regulations.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/16/2010
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

NADER ASGHARI-KAMRANI, KAMRAN ASGHARIKAMRANI,

Appellants

v.

UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION,

Appellee

______________________ 

2018-1040, 2018-1041

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 

CBM2016-00063, CBM2016-00064.

______________________ 

SUA SPONTE

______________________ 

Before DYK, WALLACH, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. 

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the above-captioned appeals, 

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 
2 ASGHARI-KAMRANI v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE

(1) These appeals (Nos. 2018-1040 and 2018-1041) are 

dismissed as moot, and the decisions of the U.S. 

Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and 

Appeal Board are vacated in view of our affirmance of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia’s judgment of patent ineligibility in Asghari-Kamrani v. United Services Automobile Ass’n, Appeal Nos. 2016-2415, 2017-2101, 

and 2017-2191, and the parties’ agreement at oral 

argument that affirmance of the district court’s ineligibility decision has the effect of invalidating all

claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,266,432. 

(2) No costs.

 FOR THE COURT

September 11, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court

 

.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 9/7/15 10:15 AM

Received: September 06, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8kz6-qf8e

Comments Due: September 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule- Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-5142

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: jeremy grand

General Comment

I support this proposed rule. It provides consistency and removes opportunity for confusion 

between different types of advisors. Persons selling financial products should either put the 

client's interests first, or make it very clear that they are selling for their own profit, and caveat 

emptor.
#### Theodore B. Gates, *Appellant, v.*Henry E. Young and others, *Respondents.*

— Order affirmed wih costs. Opinion by

Pratt, J.;

Dykman, J., not sitting.
From: Laura Clay Trueman

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA

Subject: Comment on Interim Rule Keeping Young Adults Covered

Date: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 8:11:58 AM

Hi

I want you to make certain that those of us who were laid off from our jobs through the recession will

be able to keep our young adults insured. Right now, our 21-year-old son is going “bare” even though

he works full-time at a clothing store, lives at home, and would be a full-time college student if we had

the funds to make that happen.

Here is my story:

I worked for UnitedHealth from 2007 to 2008. I was the conduit through which my family of 5 – a selfemployed lawyer husband and then 14, 16, and 19-year-old children were covered. My son was on

the plan by virtue of being a student at Catholic University.

In December 2008, the company eliminated my position.

I opted to keep the family covered through COBRA, at a cost of $1200 per month.

After 15 months of job hunting, I landed a new job working for a 250 person company in the District of

Columbia. Because my son is no longer a full-time student (we could not afford to keep him at

Catholic University at $50,000 per year), my new company would not pick him up as part of our new

family insurance plan. (I am assuming that the new law will require that this company cover him come

Sept 23.)

In the meantime, I tried to keep him covered through the COBRA plan we had with UnitedHealth.

However, they also declined to continue him on COBRA because he is not currently a full-time student,

although we hope he will be in the fall.

So, even though United was making public pronouncements in the paper that they were planning to

insure young people ahead of the September deadline, this seemed to be narrowly interpreted. Only if

you were graduating from college this spring would they keep you on the parent’s plan. If your kid

could not afford to be in college because they had cut you lose from employment in the middle of a

recession, they would not keep you covered through til Sept 23.

My message is to encourage you to cover all the “loopholes” that are so carefully looked for by the

insurance companies.

-- 

Laura
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-21-00116-CV

BISON DRILLING AND FIELD SERVICES LLC and Bison Trucking LLC,

Appellants

v.

MCDAY ENERGY CORP., Donald W. Orr, and McDay Oil & Gas, Inc.,

Appellees

From the 293rd Judicial District Court, Zavala County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18-05-14176-ZCV

Honorable Maribel Flores, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE 

VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, appellants’ motion to dismiss the 

appeal is GRANTED and this appeal is DISMISSED AS MOOT. Costs of appeal are assessed 

against appellants. 

SIGNED July 7, 2021.

_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
§ 831.60 Autopsies and postmortem testing. When a person dies as a result of having been involved in a marine casualty or major marine casualty within the jurisdiction of the NTSB— ( a ) The NTSB is authorized to obtain, with or without reimbursement, a copy of a report of autopsy performed by a State or local authority on such person.
( b ) The NTSB may order an autopsy or other postmortem tests of any person as may be related to its investigation of a marine casualty or major marine casualty. The IIC may direct that an autopsy or other test be performed if necessary for an investigation. Provisions of local law protecting religious beliefs with respect to autopsies shall be observed to the extent they are consistent with the needs of the investigation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         333,962
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,412,213
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (549,016)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,244,526
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,728,788
<PP&E>                                       1,324,749
<DEPRECIATION>                               (224,101)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,097,825
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,385,957
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,098,249
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,097,825
<SALES>                                      2,833,884
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,833,884
<CGS>                                        1,869,692
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  883,172
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (26,265)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 65,030
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (16,257)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             81,020
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    48,773
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>