alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# U.S. Strikes in Afghanistan Target Senior al-Qaida Leaders

/ Published Oct. 27, 2016

WASHINGTON, Oct. 27, 2016—Precision U.S. strikes conducted Oct. 23 targeted two of al-Qaida's most senior leaders in Afghanistan, Pentagon Press Secretary Peter Cook announced last night.

In a statement, Cook said officials are still assessing the results of the strikes, which targeted Faruq al-Qatani and Bilal al-Utabi.

“Their demise would represent a significant blow to the terrorist group's presence in Afghanistan, which remains committed to facilitating attacks against the United States, our allies and partners,” the press secretary said.

**Responsible for Establishing Safe Havens**

Qatani served as al-Qaida's emir for northeastern Afghanistan, assigned by the group's leadership to re-establish safe havens for the terrorist organization, Cook said. “He was a senior planner for attacks against the United States, and has a long history of directing deadly attacks against U.S. forces and our coalition allies,” he added.

Utabi is assessed to have been involved in efforts to re-establish a safe haven in Afghanistan from which to threaten the West, Cook said, and in efforts to recruit and train foreign fighters.

After an extensive period of surveillance, the United States targeted the al-Qaida leaders at what was assessed as command-and-control locations in remote areas of Afghanistan’s Kunar province, Cook said.

“If these strikes are determined to be successful,” he added, “eliminating these core leaders of al-Qaida will disrupt efforts to plot against the United States and our allies and partners around the world, reduce the threat to our Afghan partners, and assist their efforts to deny al-Qaida safe haven in Afghanistan.
#### § 821.13 Waivers.

Waivers of any rights provided by statute or regulation shall either be in writing or by stipulation made at the hearing and entered into the record, and shall set forth the precise terms and conditions of the waiver.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 607 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     November 14, 2002.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 3210) to ensure the 
continued financial capacity of insurers to provide coverage for risks from 
terrorism. All points of order against the conference report and against its 
consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0576.html[7/20/2015 9:22:31 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-wvhe

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0576

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: John Kong

General Comment

I chose to invest in my retirement because my guaranteed Social Security benefits that I paid for as well, may be

 bankrupt before I can enjoy the fruits of MY labor. This is not the government's money so hands off!
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 52130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4492]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

TIME AND DATE: 12:00 p.m., Monday, September 17, 2007.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Smith, Director, or Dave 
Skidmore, Assistant to the Board, Office of Board Members at 202-452-
2955.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 7, 
2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 07-4492 Filed 9-7-07; 5:02 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
H. Res. 600

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 13, 2002.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 5710) to establish the

Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes.

The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. The

amendment specified in section 2 of this resolution shall be

considered as adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage

without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on

the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled by the

chairman and ranking minority member of the Select Committee on Homeland Security; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

SEC. 2. The amendment referred to in the first section

of this resolution is as follows:

Amend section 2(10)(B) so as to read:
2

•HRES 600 EH

‘‘(B) an Indian Tribe or authorized tribal organization, or in Alaska a Native Village or Alaska

Regional Native Corporation; and’’.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 581.2 Purpose.

The purpose of this standard is to reduce physical damage to the front and rear ends of a passenger motor vehicle from low speed collisions.
AEG 148E81-O4

G DIVISIO!
SS CATIONS

Page 1 of 1

FEB 1.6 2016

IAs of: February 16, 2010
Received: February 13, 2010
Status: Posted
PUBLIC SUBMISSION Peet:tvy 16201
Comments Due: May 03, 2010]
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0006
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants & Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Comment On: IRS-2010-0006-0001
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in

Retirement Plans

Document: IRS-2010-0006-0021
Comment on FR Doc # N/A

Submitter Information

Name: David Earl Hooten
Address:

3227 Shadow Lake Ln.
Matthews, NC, 28104
Email: dehooten@yahoo.com
Phone: 704-882-5893
Organization: Retired

General Comment

Employers should be required to work with third party administrators who do/can offer a lifetime
annuity option with survivor benefits to employees. However, the responsibility cannot end with
offering a plan. Participants must be educated on the appropriateness of a lifetime income as
opposed to other options. While appropriate for many, annuities are not for all. The promise of
lifetime income, for instance, cannot make up for lack of retirement savings. Neither may an
annuity be appropriate for retiring employees with medical conditions that may shorten their lives
or employees that are retiring at an early age whereby the effects of inflation may cause
retirement to be underfunded even though the person will receive a check for a lifetime. One may
get a check for the rest of their lives but this fact won't necessarily mean they have adequate
retirement funding. In other words, a lifetime income option should be only one option in a whole
list of options, including rollovers, interest only payments, minimum distribution, systematic
withdrawals and cash.

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=..._ 2/16/2010
#### Henry A. Spafard, Respondent, v. John Hogan, Appellant.

Order vacated, without costs; order to be entered as directed in opinion. Opinion *Per Ouriam.*
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of eAutoclaims, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended April 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on June 13, 2008 (the Report), I, Larry Colton, the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of eAutoclaims, Inc.





/s/ Larry ColtonPrint Name:  Larry Colton Title:  Chief Financial Officer June 13, 2008


---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1333

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, on the relation of

James E. Long, Commissioner of Insurance, as

Liquidator of Twentieth Century Life Insurance

Company,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CANDACE L. COOPER,

Defendant - Appellant,

and

LOUIS J. HEVEY; GLENN H. MARTIN,

Defendants.

No. 96-1392

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, on the relation of

James E. Long, Commissioner of Insurance, as

Liquidator of Twentieth Century Life Insurance

Company,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus
2

GLENN H. MARTIN,

Defendant - Appellant,

and

CANDACE L. COOPER; LOUIS J. HEVEY,

Defendants.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.

(CA-92-783-5-F, CA-94-850-5-F2)

Argued: May 7, 1998 Decided: June 23, 1998

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ARGUED: Walter Wm. Hofheinz, LAW OFFICE OF WALTER WM. HOFHEINZ,

Dallas, Texas; Noel Lee Allen, ALLEN & PINNIX, P.A., Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellants. V. Lane Wharton, Jr., BODE, CALL &

STROUPE, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. ON BRIEF:

Anthony D. Taibi, BODE, CALL & STROUPE, L.L.P., Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Candace L. Cooper and Glenn H. Martin appeal the district

court's orders granting summary judgment to the Plaintiff on the

claim of breach of fiduciary duty as to Cooper and for violations

of North Carolina's Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations

Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 75D. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm essentially on the reasoning of the district court.

North Carolina v. Cooper, No. CA-92-783-5-F, North Carolina v.

Martin, No. CA-94-850-5-F2 (E.D.N.C., Jan. 16, 1996, Feb. 1, 1996;

Feb. 22, 1996).

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

 

The Board of Directors 

COMARCO, Inc. 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 33-42350, 33-37863, 33-44943, 33-45096, 33-50068, 33-63219, 333-1749,333-78677, and 333-42350) on Forms S-8 of Comarco, Inc. of our report dated May 9, 2004 except as to note 19, which is as of May 9, 2005, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Comarco, Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 31, 2004, and therelated consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended January 31, 2004, and the related schedule, which report appears in the January 31, 2005 annual report onForm 10-K of Comarco, Inc. and subsidiaries. 

 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

 

Costa Mesa, California 

May 11, 2005
Page 1 of2 rg£Q-,. )}rij )2 --/0 

i\fJrJ 2 ~ 

,!u1!~I:~~~~gSmf~~~ As of: August 25, 2010 

Received: August 10, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 25, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2d1aO 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, ~~01O 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0353 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

--------------------------------------------------------------------,---­

Submitter Information 

Name: Sharon D. Felice 

Address: 

PO Box 1604 

Olney, MD, 20830 

Email: sherryfelice@comcast.net 

General Comment 

August 10, 2010 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status 

as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-2010­

0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

https:/ Ifdms.erulemaking.netffdms-web-agency IcomponentfsubmitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/25/201 0 
Page 2 of2 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these 

regulations. 

Sharon D. Felice 

. https:llfdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency IcomponentisubmitterlnfoCoverPage ?Call=... 8/25/2010
-----Original Message----- 

From: James Laubacher [mailto:tcore2@verizon.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:26 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: lifetime income RFI 

 Keep your hands off my 401/k. I don't want the government managing 

my retirement fund. Frankly, I believe the government has demonstrated 

gross incompetence in financial matters and is only looking for cash to 

bailout it's own deficit.
H. Res. 401

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 30, 2002.

Whereas the University of Connecticut Huskies women’s basketball team won its second National Collegiate Athletic

Association championship in 3 years by defeating the

University of Oklahoma by the score of 82–70;

Whereas the team, coached by NCAA Division I women’s

basketball Coach of the Year, Geno Auriemma, finished

the 2002 season with a perfect 39–0 record, becoming

only the 4th NCAA Division I women’s basketball team

to finish a season undefeated;

Whereas Sue Bird was chosen as the national women’s Player

of the Year;

Whereas Swin Cash was named the Final Four Most Outstanding Player;

Whereas Sue Bird, Swin Cash, Diana Taurasi, Asjha Jones,

and Tamika Williams were selected as All-Americans;

Whereas the University of Connecticut Huskies’ 35-point average margin of victory during the regular season was

the largest average margin of victory in NCAA Division

I women’s basketball history;

Whereas the University of Connecticut Huskies dominated

this year’s championship tournament, averaging 83.3
2

•HRES 401 EH

points and a 27-point margin of victory en route to the

championship;

Whereas the high caliber of the University of Connecticut

Huskies in both athletics and academics has significantly

advanced the sport of women’s basketball and provided

inspiration for future generations of young men and

women alike; and

Whereas the University of Connecticut Huskies’ championship season has rallied Connecticut residents of all ages

behind a common purpose and triggered a wave of euphoria across the State: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives commends

the University of Connecticut Huskies women’s basketball

team for winning the 2002 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I women’s basketball championship and for

completing the 2001–2002 season with a 39–0 record.

Attest:

Clerk.
Home About Us

Water

Services Projects Our Clients

Benefits

Careers News

Home

About Us

Services

Water

Wastewater & Recycled Water

Stormwater

Electrical and I&C

Industrial & Institutional Facilities

Construction Management (CM)

Design-Build

Projects

Water Treatment

Wastewater Treatment and Recycling

Water Pump Stations and Reservoirs

Wastewater and Stormwater Pump Stations

Pipelines

Electrical and Instrumentation

Construction Management and Resident Inspection

Design-Build Engineering

Our Clients

Careers

Benefits

Openings

Apply Here

News

Contact Us

City of Industry, CA (Headquarters)

San Diego, CA

Sacramento, CA

Walnut Creek, CA

Home

About Us

Services

Water

Wastewater & Recycled Water

Stormwater

Electrical and I&C

Industrial & Institutional Facilities

Construction Management (CM)

Design-Build

Projects

Water Treatment

Wastewater Treatment and Recycling

Water Pump Stations and Reservoirs

Wastewater and Stormwater Pump Stations

Pipelines

Electrical and Instrumentation

Construction Management and Resident Inspection

Design-Build Engineering

Our Clients

Careers

Benefits

Openings

Apply Here

News

Contact Us

City of Industry, CA (Headquarters)

San Diego, CA

Sacramento, CA

Walnut Creek, CA

Pacheco Pumping Plant (PPP) Upgrading and Adjustable Speed Drive (ASD) Replacement Project

Santa Clara Valley Water District

San Jose, CA

water, LEE & RO, Inc. Pacheco Page 1 of 2

http://www.lee-ro.com/pacheco.html 4/29/2014
LEE & RO provided study, design and construction support services for a $14 million electrical & mechanical system

improvement project for the 350 CFS capacity PPP. PPP has twelve (12) main pumps with wound rotor motors rated for

2,000HP each. The existing motor starters/controls are 1970s technology - Toshiba Adjustable Speed Drives (ASDs). The

project included replacement of 4,160 volt ASDs with new variable frequency drives (VFDs), testing of the 2,000 hp

motor drives per NETA and IEEE requirements, structurally retrofitting the pump gallery to accommodate VFDs,

installation of a new flowmeter and RTU and SCADA connections for each of the 12 pump discharge lines, replacing

HVAC and chillers, and optimization of pump controls.

water, LEE & RO, Inc. Pacheco Page 2 of 2

http://www.lee-ro.com/pacheco.html 4/29/2014
National Tribal Air Association

NTAA- EPA Air Policy Call Agenda – October 25, 2012

This will be a short call with no documents.

 The general Go to Meeting ID: 138-746-896

Call In Number: 888-824-5783

Conference Code: 97728037#

(10 AM Alaska, 11 AM Pacific, 12 Noon Mountain, 1 PM Central, 2 PM Eastern)

Agenda for Today’s Call:

1. Proposed rule making on startups/shutdowns and malfunctions. – Phil Lorang, OAQPS (5

Minutes)

2. FY 2014 NPM Guidance - Mike Hadrick, OAR (10 Minutes)

3. Tribal Minor NSR Registration Database - Tami Laplante (OAQPS) (15 Minutes)

4. Other EPA Air Updates (OTAQ, ORIA, Etc.)

5. NTAA/OAQPS Updates

Next Call will be on Thursday, November, 29 2012 at 12:00 noon Mountain Time
**Exhibit 31.2**COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Robert J. Landis, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Comprehensive Care Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and