alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 329

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that lobbyists should

not be granted special access privileges to the Capitol and congressional

offices that are not available to other citizens of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 20, 2001

Ms. KILPATRICK submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

lobbyists should not be granted special access privileges

to the Capitol and congressional offices that are not

available to other citizens of the United States.

Whereas a fundamental principle of American democracy is

that all citizens are created equal and all should have access to Government leaders;

Whereas there is a perception among many Americans that

special interest groups and lobbyists for special interest

groups have access to decision makers that ordinary citizens do not have;

Whereas this perception contributes to a belief that middleclass citizens, and those of more modest means, are treated unfairly in the political process;
2

•HRES 329 IH

Whereas it is important that Americans have confidence that

Congress will treat all citizens equitably, regardless of

whether they are represented by professional lobbyists;

Whereas recent terrorist events have increased the need for

security precautions at the Capitol and surrounding congressional office buildings;

Whereas tightened security measures may make it more difficult for members of the public and lobbyists to gain access to the Capitol complex;

Whereas some lobbyists are now seeking to gain special privileges for access to the Capitol complex that would not be

available to other members of the general public who

have official business before Congress;

Whereas giving lobbyists privileged access to congressional offices that is not available to the general public who have

official business before Congress would further contribute

to the perception that ordinary citizens are treated unfairly in the legislative process; and

Whereas granting privileged access for lobbyists is likely to

increase public cynicism about Congress and the political

process and heighten concerns about the excessive influence of special interests and lobbyists: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that in establishing rules governing access to

3 the Capitol or congressional offices for those who have of4 ficial business before Congress, lobbyists should not be
3

•HRES 329 IH

1 granted special privileges that are not available to other

2 citizens of the United States.

Æ
Filed 9/23/14 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2014 ND 178

In the Interest of Raymond Voisine, Respondent

Jonathan Byers, Special Assistant 

State’s Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee

v.

Raymond J. Voisine, Respondent and Appellant

No. 20140051

Appeal from the District Court of Sheridan County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Sonna M. Anderson, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Jonathan R. Byers, Special Assistant Attorney General, 600 East Boulevard Avenue, Bismarck, ND 58505-0040, for petitioner and appellee.

Kent M. Morrow, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2155, for respondent and appellant.

Interest of Voisine

No. 20140051

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Raymond Voisine appeals from a district court order denying his request for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual.  Voisine’s actions leading to his civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual have resulted in proceedings leading to five previous appeals to this Court.  See Voisine v. State, 2008 ND 91, ¶ 17, 748 N.W.2d 429 (reversing and vacating revocation of probation in postconviction proceeding); Matter of Voisine, 2010 ND 17, ¶¶ 1, 15, 777 N.W.2d 908 (reversing commitment as sexually dangerous individual and remanding for further proceedings); In Interest of Voisine, 2010 ND 241, ¶ 1, 795 N.W.2d 38 (summarily affirming commitment as sexually dangerous individual); Interest of Voisine, 2012 ND 250, ¶ 1, 823 N.W.2d 786 (summarily affirming denial of request for discharge from commitment as sexually dangerous offender); Voisine v. State, 2014 ND 98, ¶ 2 (summarily affirming denial of petition for postconviction relief).

[¶2]In this appeal, Voisine argues the district court erred in denying his request for discharge because there was not clear and convincing evidence that he was likely to engage in further acts of sexually predatory conduct and that he has serious difficulty controlling his behavior.  We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶3]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom
lps21153
[No. 2079.]

#### Austin v. Snider et al.

*Appeal from the District Court of El Paso County.*

Mr. Chas. F. Potter and Mr. R. T. McNeal, for appellant.

Mr. Arthur Cornforth and Messrs. Gunnelh & IÍamlin, for appellees.

Gunter, J.

This case was argued with No. 2077, *ante,*page 176, and so far as material to this ruling involves the same questions. For reasons there given the judgment is reversed. *Reversed.*
H. Res. 266

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 30, 2001.

Whereas Barry Bonds has brought distinction to Major

League Baseball and excellence to the San Francisco Giants, following in the baseball footsteps of his father,

Bobby Bonds, and his godfather, Willie Mays;

Whereas Barry Bonds has had an outstanding career that so

far includes 3 Most Valuable Player awards, 10 All-Star

Game appearances, 8 Rawlings Gold Glove awards, and

the distinction of being named Player of the Decade for

the 1990s by the Sporting News;

Whereas in 2001 Barry Bonds had one of the greatest seasons in Major League Baseball history, achieving 73

home runs, a slugging average of .863, and an on-base

percentage of .515;

Whereas Barry Bonds has established himself as the most

prolific single-season home run hitter in Major League

Baseball history, hitting his 73rd home run on October

7, 2001, eclipsing the previous record of 70 home runs

set by Mark McGwire in 1998;

Whereas Barry Bonds has attained the rank of 7th place on

the all-time Major League Baseball home run list with

567;
2

•HRES 266 EH

Whereas Barry Bonds drove in 136 runs to set a Giants

franchise record for runs batted in by a left fielder, and

has recorded at least 100 RBI’s in each of 10 different

seasons;

Whereas of Bonds’ 73 home runs, 24 gave San Francisco the

lead and 7 tied the game;

Whereas Barry Bonds also hit the 500th home run of his career during the 2001 season, a 2-run game-winning home

run which landed in the waters of McCovey Cove, San

Francisco;

Whereas Barry Bonds, at age 37, is the oldest player in

Major League Baseball history to hit more than 50, 60,

and 70 home runs in a single season;

Whereas Barry Bonds has recorded 484 stolen bases in his

career, becoming the only Major League Baseball player

to both hit more than 400 home runs and steal more

than 400 bases;

Whereas Barry Bonds’ 233 stolen bases achieved while playing for San Francisco place him 6th on the Giants franchise list behind his father, Bobby, who is 5th with 263

stolen bases;

Whereas Barry Bonds has proven himself to be an active

leader not only in the Giants clubhouse but also in the

community, donating approximately $100,000 to the September 11th Fund to aid the victims of the terrorist attacks in New York, Washington, D.C., and Pennsylvania;

and

Whereas Barry Bonds has also devoted his time and money

to support the Link & Learn Program of the United

Way, and has been an active participant in numerous
3

•HRES 266 EH

other San Francisco Bay area community efforts: Now,

therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates Barry Bonds on his spectacular record-breaking season

in 2001 and outstanding career in Major League Baseball,

wishes him continued success in the seasons to come, and

thanks him for his contributions to baseball and to his community.

Attest:

Clerk.
Docket: EBSA-2010-0007 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in 

Retirement Plans 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0007-0001 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options 

Document: EBSA-2010-0007-DRAFT-0042 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: paul irvine 

Address: 

bogart, GA, 

General Comment 

Oh dear, already i believe i have surrendered to the crown all social security money i have ever paid in. I 

do not expect to ever see it. For you to take my IRA savings as well will render me a destitute peasant. 

if this is truly what you desire, it is to the mattresses or leave for less confiscatory countries. However, 

you will succeed through this policy of capturing a good deal of my saved income. Through this and 

other reckless policy initiatives you are prodding me to consume and not save anymore. A very subtle 

and clever stimulus package perhaps? better consume it now because we are taking it all later. This is 

ultimately a problem of course, for both capital formation and govt's own borrowing, but that is for 

tomorrow i suppose. 

regards. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: March 01, 2010 

Received: February 22, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80aa9839 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=Print&PrintId=0900006480aa98... 3/1/2010
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I,  Garry  L.  Anselmo,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report  on  Form 10-KSB of Silverado Gold Mines Ltd. for the year ended November
30,  2002  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Annual
Report  on  Form  10-KSB  fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Silverado  Gold  Mines  Ltd.


                          By:    /s/ Garry  L.  Anselmo
                                 -----------------------
                          Name:
  Garry  L.  Anselmo
                          Title: Chief  Executive  Officer  and
                                 Chief  Financial  Officer
                          Date:  February  28,  2003
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.99 MB)
 
 al Udeid Air Base
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
AMEND 2 CNG 1999 SERP



 




Exhibit 10.31




AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE COLE NATIONAL

GROUP, INC. 1999 SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN



     WHEREAS, Cole National Group, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted the Cole
National Group, Inc. 1999 Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan effective as of
January 1, 1999 (the “Plan”);



     WHEREAS, the Company adopted Amendment No. 1 to the Plan dated as of
January 25, 2002;



     WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 6.1 of the Plan, the Company hereby amends
the Plan, as provided herein, as Amendment No. 2 to the Plan; and



     WHEREAS, the Company hereby adopts this Amendment No. 2. Words and
phrases used herein with initial capital letters that are not defined herein
shall have the meaning provided in the Plan.



Section 1



          Section 3.2 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as
follows:



     “SECTION 3.2. Time of Payment. A Participant’s (or
Beneficiary’s) Supplemental Retirement Benefit shall commence at the same time
and under the same conditions as the benefits payable to the Participant (or
Beneficiary) under the Pension Plan, or at such time and under such conditions
as may be provided in the Instrument Designating Participant applicable to the
Participant.”



Section 2



          Section 4.1 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as
follows:



     ”SECTION 4.1. Vesting. A Participant shall be vested in his
Supplemental Retirement Benefit in accordance with the vesting provisions of
the Pension Plan, or at such time and under such conditions as may be provided
in the Instrument Designating Participant applicable to the Participant.”



	 	 	 	 	 
	Dated as of January 23 , 2004	 	COLE NATIONAL GROUP, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Leslie D. Dunn
	

	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	

	 	Title:
	 	Senior Vice President
agrmtstlmtaj Ex 10-14






AGREEMENT IN SETTLEMENT OF CONSULTING SERVICES DEBT 




THIS AGREEMENT made as of the 6 th day of March 2004. 




BETWEEN:   JOHN ARKOOSH , of Concord, California      and 




CALIFORNIA NEWS TECH , of 529 Buchanan St., San Francisco, California, 94102 




WHEREAS : 




A. California News Tech, (the "Company") failed to pay its full consulting services expense for the year ended December 31, 2002 to its officers. 




B. John Arkoosh ("Officer"), the Company's Vice President of Business Development and Director, has not been paid a total of $17,500 for services rendered to the Company during the year ended December 31, 2002. 




C. The parties desire to enter into an agreement whereby the Company will issue a promissory note to Officer in consideration for services rendered to the Company. 




NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES THAT in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants hereinafter set-forth, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows: 




1.    The Company hereby agrees to issue a promissory note to Officer in the amount of $17,500 with zero percent (0%) interest per annum which shall become due and payable on March 6, 2006 in consideration for services rendered to the Company by Officer during the year ended December 31, 2002 




2.   This Promissory Note is made in settlement of all professional consulting fees owed to Officer to December 31, 2003 . This note shall not be transferable, assignable, nor collateralized. 






3.   The Company has the right to repay the entire amount due before March 6, 2006 without penalty. Repayment of this note shall be made in accordance with the use of proceeds statement contained in the year 2004 Initial Public Offering document. 



 

4.  The parties agree to execute and deliver all such further documents, agreements and instruments and take such other and further action as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out the purposes and intent of this Agreement. 




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed on this 4 th day of April, 2004 




California News Tech.                    







/s/ Marian Munz                                                                                                   /s/ John Arkoosh 

By: Marian Munz                                                                                                 By: John Arkoosh 

Its: President

 

 


	 	1
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-51129 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JOE ANTHONY SMITH Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:01-CR-279-3
Before KING, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Joe Anthony Smith appeals from the judgment of the district court revoking his term of supervised release and imposing a 48-month term of imprisonment. In an agreed judgment in a previous revocation proceeding, Smith received a sentence ofthree months ofimprisonment, in return for which he and his attorney agreed to request a sentence ofno less than 48 months upon any future revocation ofsupervised release, no matter how minor the violation. The agreed judgment notwithstanding, Smith’s attorney requested a sentence United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D April 22, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-51129

2 of less than 48 months based on what he argued was a minor violation and changed circumstances. The district court chose to enforce the agreement and imposed a 48-month sentence. Smith argues that the district court’s comments indicated that it erroneously believed that it was required to revoke his supervised release and sentence him to 48 months ofimprisonment. He contends that the district court
was not legally required to revoke his supervised release at all and that the 48- month sentence was plainly unreasonable because his violation was minor and because the district court believed it was required to impose the sentence. The Government argues that the district court’s comments did not indicate that it believed itself legally prohibited from considering a sentence of less than 48 months and that this court should enforce Smith’s agreement to request a sentence ofno less than 48 months. The Government further contends that the 48-month sentence was reasonable. The record in Smith’scasedoes not indicatethat thedistrict court believed itself bound by the agreement made before Smith’s first revocation; rather, the record i ndicates that the district court chose to honor that agreement and impose
a 48-month sentence. See R. 2, 12. The decision to revoke Smith’s supervised release was not an abuse ofdiscretion, see United States v. Teran, 98 F.3d 831, 836 (5th Cir. 1996), nor was the 48-month sentence unreasonable or plainly unreasonable. See United Statesv. Jones, 484 F.3d 783, 791-92 (5th Cir. 2007). AFFIRMED.
IV

House Calendar No. 98

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 290

[Report No. 107–294]

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 16 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 15), 2001

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported

from the Committee on Rules.

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of November 16, 2001, pro6 viding for consideration or disposition of a conference re7 port to accompany the bill (S. 1447) to improve aviation
2

HRES 290 RH

1 security, and for other purposes, or any amendment re2 ported in disagreement from a conference thereon.
House Calendar No. 98

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 290

[Report No. 107–294]

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII

with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

NOVEMBER 16 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 15), 2001

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                         115,937
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,693,826
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,359,182
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,334,154
<PP&E>                                       5,188,482
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,540,992
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,324,666
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,009,696
<BONDS>                                        170,550
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,742,636
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,948,100
<SALES>                                     21,839,529
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,839,529
<CGS>                                       12,997,906
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,997,906
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,413,160
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             231,747
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,165,886
<INCOME-TAX>                                   848,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,317,886
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,317,886
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .86
        

</TABLE>