alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1





                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT


We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Sistersville
Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary as of June 30, 2001, and the related consolidated
statements of income, comprehensive income, and cash flows for the three-month
period then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical and procedures to
financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the
financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an
opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet as of
March 31, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive
income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended
(not presented herein); and in our report dated April 20, 2001, we expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.


/s/ S.R. SNODGRASS, A.C.


Wheeling, West Virginia
August 6, 2001
Belknap,

Dec., 1895.

#### Maltais *v.*Foss.

One who has agreed to pay a stipulated price per cord for the cutting and peeling of bark on a certain farm is liable for similar labor performed on adjoining land if he has accepted the benefit of the services.

Assumpsit, for cutting lumber and peeling bark. Trial by jury. Verdict for the plaintiff*. By an agreement in writing the plaintiff was to peel all the hemlock bark standing on the Tuttle farm in Lincoln that the defendant might require, and receive therefor $1,871 per cord. The plaintiff’s evidence tended to prove the following facts: The plaintiff cut and peeled 420 cords of bark. The defendant paid him for 338 cords, and refused to pay for the balance on the ground that it was cut on land of an adjoining owner. The plaintiff supposed he was cutting on the Tuttle farm, but he did in fact cut lumber producing eighty-seven cords of bark on other land. The defendant did *not*point out the lines, nor did the plaintiff request him to do so. No one had demanded damages of the plaintiff for the trespass. The defendant had the lumber and bark for the cutting of which suit was brought. The defendant excepted to the denial of his motion for a nonsuit.

*Frank M. JBeckford*and *Fdioin U. Shannon,*for the plaintiff.

*Jewell, Stone, Owen Martin,*for the defendant.

Clark, J.

The only question is whether there was error in the denial of the motion for a nonsuit. The plaintiff’s evidence tended to show that “the defendant had the lumber and bark for the cutting of which suit was brought.” From this, the jury could properly infer that the defendant accepted and took the benefit of the plaintiff’s labor at the agreed price; or at its value, if, as the plaintiff in his brief asserts, there was a *quantum meruit*count.

*Judgment on the verdict.*

Parsons, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         August 31, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on August 23, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 36 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2023-244, CP2023-247.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-18783 Filed 8-30-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Carter Offers Condolences for Fallen U.S. Service Member in Syria
 
  Defense Secretary Ash Carter today offered his condolences to the family, friends and other loved ones of a U.S. service member who was killed on Thanksgiving in Syria. “I am deeply saddened by the news on this Thanksgiving Day that one of our brave service members has been killed in Syria while protecting us from the evil of ISIL,” Carter said in a statement issued today. “It is a painful reminder of the dangers our men and women in uniform face around the world to keep us safe.”











Operation Inherent Resolve - Targeted Operations Against ISIL Terrorists
        Operation Inherent Resolve
            Operation Inherent Resolve - Targeted Operations Against ISIL Terrorists

            SHARE IMAGE:

                Download Image
                    Image Details
                    
                    Photo By: DoD Graphic
                    
                    VIRIN: 160401-D-XT155-002 The secretary added, “Please keep this service member's family, friends and teammates in your thoughts and prayers, and this Thanksgiving I hope you will join me in expressing thanks to all of our dedicated troops who selflessly protect us every day.” The U.S. service member died from wounds sustained in an improvised explosive device blast in the vicinity of Ayn Issa in northern Syria, according to a Combined Joint Task Force - Operation Inherent Resolve news release. Further information will be released as appropriate, the release said. “The entire counter-ISIL coalition sends our condolences to this hero's family, friends and teammates,” Army Lt. Gen. Stephen J. Townsend, commander of Combined Joint Task Force - Operation Inherent Resolve, said in the release. “On this Thanksgiving, please be thankful that there are service members willing to take up the fight to protect our homeland from ISIL's hateful and brutal ideology.”
##### 



STATE OF INCORPORATIONThe Concord Telephone Company
    
    North CarolinaCT Wireless Cable, Inc.
    
    North CarolinaWavetel, L.L.C.
    
    DelawareWebServe, Inc.
    
    North CarolinaWireless One of North Carolina, L.L.C.
    
    North CarolinaCTC Long Distance Services, LLC
    
    North CarolinaCT Cellular, Inc.
    
    North CarolinaCTC Exchange Services, Inc.
    
    North CarolinaCTC Internet Services, Inc.
    
    North CarolinaCTC Services, Inc.
    
    North CarolinaCTC Employment Services, LLC
    
    North CarolinaProgress Place Realty Holding Company, LLC
    
    North CarolinaCT Global, LLC
    
    North CarolinaWavetel NC License Corporation
    
    DelawareWavetel TN, L.L.C.
    
    DelawareCarolina Personal Communications, Inc.
    
    North CarolinaCTC Video Services, LLC
    
    North Carolina
Exhibit 10

  Exhibit 10.3
 

 

 

 Extension of lease agreement between American Covers, Inc. DBA Handstands and Flexpoint sensor Systems, Inc.
 

 

 As of January 1, 2015 American Covers Inc, DBA Handstands (“Landlord”) and Flexpoint Sensor Systems, Inc. (“Tenant”) agree to modify their current lease agreement for the office and warehouse space containing 11,639 rentable square feet located at 106 West 12200 South Business Park Dr, Draper, Utah 84020 as follows.
 

 Whereas the current lease agreement dated April 1, 2009 expired on December 31, 2011 and the
 extension lease expired on December 31, 2014 and converted to a month to month lease the Landlord 
 and Tenant agree to the following month to month payment schedule.  Either party may terminate this 
 agreement with a 90 day notice period upon written notification.
 

 ·
     Beginning January 1, 2015 through December 1, 2015 - $8,950 per month
 ·
     Beginning January 1, 2016 through December 1, 2016 - $9,300 per month
 ·
     Beginning January 1, 2017 through December 1, 2017 - $9,600 per month
 

 Upon expiration of this lease extension the contract will become a month to month lease and the rate
 will be the current rate at the time of extension plus 10%.  In addition the month to month rate will 
 increase by 10% on each anniversary date.
 

 Per agreement between the parties which modifies the provisions of section 3.a. of the original lease
 agreement rent payments under this lease are due on the 15th of each month.  Per section 3.b. There 
 will be a 10 day grace period for late payments.
 

 All terms and conditions contained in the original lease dated April 1, 2009 are to remain 
 unchanged.
 

 

 

 LANDLORD:
 TENANT:
 American Covers, Inc., DBA Handstands
 Flexpoint Sensor Systems
 

 

 By:
 /s/ Rodd C. Steuart
 By: /s/ Clark M. Mower
 

 Title:   CFO
  Title:
 President
# USMC F-35B conducts first combat strike in CENTCOM AOR

/ Published Sept. 28, 2018

During this mission, the F-35B conducted an air strike in support of ground clearance operations, and the strike was deemed successful by the ground force commander.

“The F-35B is a significant enhancement in theater amphibious and air warfighting capability, operational flexibility, and tactical supremacy,” said Vice Adm. Scott Stearney, commander, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command. “As part of the Essex Amphibious Ready Group, this platform supports operations on the ground from international waters, all while enabling maritime superiority that enhances stability and security.”

The 13th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) is the first combat-deployed MEU to replace the AV-8B Harrier with the F-35B Lightning II. The F-35Bs from Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 211 are currently embarked on the Wasp-class amphibious assault ship USS Essex (LHD 2) as part of Essex Amphibious Ready Group.
8/27/2015 Request for Information ­ FAA­2015­2659

https://email.dot.gov/owa/9­AWA­AVS­333Exemptions@faa.gov/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAABFvqQJAFf5SI8crGhIsEIyBwD3qfMUO7BCQ74YBi9P12... 1/1

Request for Information ­ FAA­2015­2659

9­AWA­AVS­333Exemptions (FAA)

Sent:Thursday, August 27, 2015 4:06 PM

To: carl@jirehcom.com

Dear Mr. Ulbrich:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA­2015­2659).

This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order

8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove

closed‐set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested

response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non‐proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want

us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 9/10/15. If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267­4264.

Sincerely,

Dan Ngo

FAA Office of Rulemaking
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT

Board of Directors
Sistersville Bancorp, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Sistersville
Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary as of September 30, 2002, and the related
consolidated statements of cash flows for the six-month period ended, and the
consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the six- and
three-month period then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet as of
March 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive
income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended
(not presented herein); and in our report dated April 12, 2002, we expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ S. R. SNODGRASS, A.C.


Wheeling, West Virginia
October 31, 2002
Page | of 1

QD my ’
wobivisiON = KEG-//8 9/20
see CATION OB REGUL LATIONS 1eG-/ 8 IATC AUG 5 2010

As of: August 05, 2010

PUBLIC Status: Posted,

Posted: August 05, 2010
SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Pian under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0019
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

LS .

Submitter Information

Name: Joseph Polanco
Address:
1349 Empire Central, Suite 220
Dallas, TX, 75247
Email: joep@piamidam.org
Phone: 214-630-8871
Fax: 214-688-1767
Organization: PIA MidAmerica

General Comment

As a small business, and trade association representing small business, we very concerned about
the Grandfathering aspects of the legislation. We are already seeing carriers increasing rates by
double digits -- and in instances like ours over 40%. Consequently, firms are forced to change
coverages and cost sharing; otherwise we will not be able to operate profitably and take care of
our customers -- and maintain our employment base.

In this environment of escalating medical costs, as well as carriers aggressively re-pricing, it's not
realistic to assume that small business will be able to take adantage of any grandfathering.

https://fdms.erulemaking .net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 8/5/2010
```

[House Report 107-463]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     107-463

======================================================================

 
 PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 3994, AFGHANISTAN FREEDOM SUPPORT 
                              ACT OF 2002

                                _______
                                

May 15 (legislative day, May 14), 2002.--Referred to the House Calendar 
                       and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

 Mr. Diaz-Balart, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 419]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 419, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3994, to 
authorize economic and democratic development assistance for 
Afghanistan and to authorize military assistance for 
Afghanistan and certain other foreign countries, under an open 
rule.
    The rule provides one hour of general debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on International Relations. The rule 
provides that it shall be in order to consider as an original 
bill for the purpose of amendment the amendment in the nature 
of a substitute recommended by the Committee on International 
Relations now printed in the bill.
    The rule provides that the committee amendment in the 
nature of a substitute shall be considered by title rather than 
by section. The rule allows the Chairman of the Committee of 
the Whole to accord priority in recognition to those Members 
who have pre-printed their amendments in the Congressional 
Record.
    Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.

                                  

```
#### James *v.*Cooledge & Brother.

Argued June 22, 1907..

Decided February 7, 1908.

Illegality. Before Judge Bartlett. Douglas superior court. May 17, 1906.

*J. D. IZilpairich*and *J. S. James,*for plaintiff in error.

*Tye, Peeples, Bryan & Jordan*and *Roberts & 'Hutcheson,*contra.

Atkinson, J.

1. When an affidavit of illegality has been filed to the levy of a fi. fa., and has been returned by the levying officer to the proper court for trial, the pleadings are the fi. fa. and the affidavit. *Miller*v. *Perkerson,*128 *Ga.*465.

2. Where the only ground of illegality is alleged to be that the fi. fa., special in its nature and against specific property, is levied upon other property of the defendant, and for that reason the levy is illegal, the court will, on inspection, compare the grounds of the illegality with the fi. fa.; and if the fi. fa. is found to be general as well as special, the illegality will be dismissed.

3. An execution commanding the sheriff that of the goods and chattels, lands and tenements, of the Georgia Western Cotton Mills as principal, and J. S. James as security, and especially of the following lands and improvements thereon of the Georgia Western Cotton Mills, to wit, town lots of land numbers 4, 8 to 25, in lot 62 qf said town of Douglas-ville, Georgia, etc., is a general execution against the two named defendants as well as a special execution against the described property.

4. Where there is a conflict between the bill of exceptions and the transcript of the record, the conflict must be determined by inspection of the transcript. *Southern Ry. Co.*v. Flemister, 120 *Ga.*524.

*Judgment aflvrmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Holden, J., who did not preside.*
#### HARRY GOLDSHINE, SAM HARRIS AND MORRIS ROTHMAN, PROSECUTORS, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY (RICHARD HARTSHORNE, JUDGE OF THE ESSEX COMMON PLEAS), DEFENDANTS.

Submitted October term, 1932

Decided October 23, 1933.

Before Justices Parker, Lloyd and Heher.

Por the prosecutors, *A. Milton Jacobs*and *Kessler & Kessler.*

Por the defendants, *Louis A. Fast.*

Per Curiam.

The case as exhibited on the papers before us is very incomplete, but we gather that the prosecutors were convicted as disorderly persons, *i. e.,*common thieves attending a place of amusement for an unlawful purpose. Disorderly Persons act, section 6. That the conviction was before a Police Court of the city of Newark; that they procured a summary review of the conviction by Judge Hartshorne, of the Court of Common Pleas, by virtue of some such statute as section 39 of the Disorderly act *(Comp. Stat., p.*1937), or the act of 1895, relating to Police Courts. *Comp. Stat., p.*3995, *pi.*14. The precise act is unimportant. We gather further that Judge Hartshorne sustained the conviction, and we are asked to review his action on *certiorari,*as of course this court has the right to do. *Newark*v. *Kazinski,*86 *N. J. L.*59; 90 *Atl. Rep.*1016. To that end we have examined the affidavit and briefs submitted (there was no oral argument) and conclude that prosecutors have not shown a case reasonably calling for the interposition of this court.

*Allocatur*is therefore denied.
Hillsborough,

Dec., 1899.

#### Perkins, *Assignee, v.*Labrecque.

A transfer of chattels made within three months before the commencement of insolvency proceedings, in consideration of the payment of debts for which the vendee was already liable, and outside the ordinary course of business, is voidable by the vendor’s assignee in insolvency.

Tboveb, for contracts in writing, evidencing conditional sales. Facts found by the court. Before December 18,1897, the defendant had signed a note with O. Caron & Co.,, for their benefit, and had receipted for goods which had been attached in an action against them. On that date the note was due, and Caron & Co. sold to the defendant the said contracts, upon consideration of his promise to pay the note and claim. He paid these December 20, 1897. Caron & Co. were adjudged insolvent January 25, 1898, and the plaintiff was appointed assignee. The sale of the contracts was not made in the ordinary course of business.

*David W. Perkins,*for the plaintiff.

*Stone, Pattee & Greorge,*for the defendant.

Pike, J.

“ The proceedings in insolvency shall dissolve all attachments of the debtor’s property made within three months before the beginning thereof, and all . . . sales and transfers . . . which were not made in the ordinary course of business . . . shall be void; and the assignee may recover . . . any property so . . . sold or transferred.” P. S., *e.*201, s. 26. The only consideration for the sale to the .defendant was his promise to pay certain debts of the insolvents for which he was already liable; and since the sale was not made in the ordinary course of business, the assignee is entitled to recover. The defendant having paid nothing into the estate, the question whether in such a case a vendee of personal property would be entitled to a return of the consideration, paid in good faith, does not arise.

*Judgment for the plaintiff.*

Young, J., did not sit: the others’concurred.