alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Commonwealth, Appellant, *v.*Weber.

*Constitutional law*— Diseased *Domestic Animals Act of July 22,1913, P. L. 928.*

1. An indictment charging a person with failure to report a diseased animal is good under the Act of March 30, 1905, P. L. 78, even if the Act of July 22, 1913, P. L. 928, wore unconstitutional.

Argued Nov. 10, 1914.

Appeal, No. 91, Oct. T., 1914, by plaintiff, from order of Q. S. Lancaster Co., Jan. T., 1914, No. 43, sustaining demurrer to indictment in case of Commonwealth v. S. E. Weber.

Before Rice, P. J., Orlady, Head and Kephart, JJ.

Reversed.

Indictment for failing to report a diseased animal.

The indictment charged that defendant on or about November 29, 1913, and since said date, at the county aforesaid and within the jurisdiction of this court, with *224force and arms, etc., then and there being a practitioner of veterinary medicine in Pennsylvania, having received information of an animal suffering with generalized tuberculosis, did willfully and unlawfully fail to report to the secretary of the State Live. Stock Sanitary Board, the description of the animal or animals affected, with the name and address of the owner and persons in charge of the animal, the exact locality of the animal and the number of susceptible domestic animals exposed to the disease, contrary to the form of the act of the general assembly in such case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

February 24, 1915:

*Error assigned*was in sustaining demurrer to the indictment.

*A. H. Wooaward,*with him *John C.*Bell, attorney general, *J. E. B. Cunningham, John M. Groff,*district attorney, and *Coyle & Keller,*for appellant.

*John E. Malone,*with him *Edwin M. Gilbert,*for appellee, filed no printed brief.

Opinion by

Orlady, J.,

The indictment in this case concludes “contrary to the form of the Act of the General Assembly in such case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania” and does not specify the ninth section of the Act of July 22, 1913, P. L. 928, which the learned trial judge in the court below held to be unconstitutional, and for that reason sustained the demurrer filed by the defendant. Conceding this to be true, which we do not do, yet the indictment was clearly a good one and valid under the first section of the Act of March 30, 1905, P. L. 78, to which the offense charged is as applicable as to the ninth section of the latter statute. The identification *225of the offense is as specifically set out in one as the other and both acts are in force.

For the reasons given in Commonwealth v. Falk, No. 90, October Term, 1914, ante, p. 217, the judgment in this case is reversed and the record remitted to the court below with a procedendo.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
I, Daniel L. Warfel, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Omega FinancialCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterlyreport based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recently completed fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.     Date: November 5, 2004   /s/ Daniel L. Warfel     Daniel L. Warfel  Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer (principal financialofficer)
Page 25
# Dec. 25: Military airstrikes continue against ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published Dec. 25, 2014

December 25, 2014

Release # 2014125FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**SOUTHWEST ASIA -** U.S. and partner nation military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria Dec. 25 using fighter, bomber, and remotely piloted aircraft to conduct 15 airstrikes. Separately, U.S. and partner nation military forces conducted 15 airstrikes in Iraq Dec. 25 using fighter, bomber, and attack aircraft against the ISIL terrorists.

The following is a summary of those strikes:

**Syria***  Near Kobani, thirteen airstrikes destroyed three ISIL buildings, one ISIL vehicle, 17 ISIL fighting positions, two ISIL staging positions and struck two ISIL fighting positions, three ISIL large units and four ISIL tactical units.*  Near Al Hasakah, an airstrike struck an ISIL drilling tower and destroyed 2 ISIL support vehicles*  Near Ar Raqqah, an airstrike struck an ISIL assembly area

**Iraq***  Near Al Qaim, three airstrikes destroyed ISIL equipment, struck two ISIL tactical vehicles and one ISIL checkpoint.*  Near Al Asad, three airstrikes destroyed two ISIL technical vehicles, an ISIL mortar position, an ISIL rocket system, destroyed 2 ISIL vehicles, an ISIL covered revetment and struck two ISIL tactical units.*  Near Mosul, three airstrikes destroyed five ISIL vehicles, an ISIL fighting position and struck two ISIL tactical units.*  Near Sinjar, three airstrikes destroyed 3 ISIL vehicles and struck three ISIL tactical units.*  Near Bayji, an airstrike struck a large ISIL unit.*  Near Kirkuk, an airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit.*  Near Tal Afar, an airstrike struck an ISIL technical vehicle.

Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports.

The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, the region and the wider international community. The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations conducting airstrikes in Iraq include the U.S., Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Coalition Nations conducting airstrikes in Syria include the U.S., Bahrain, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.
Page 1 of 1

(CESSING DIVISION oy — ayy aff;
PUBLICATION RELATIONS fECHEUR TC bie 17 ong
B

As of: August 16, 2010

PUBLIC Status: Posted

Posted: August 16, 2010

SUBMISSION Comments Duet August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0096
Comment on FR Dac # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Shelly S Riley
Address:

4633 Shriver Road

North Canton, OH, 44720
Email: ssriley614@aol.com
Phone: 330-212-9857

General Comment

See attached file(s)

Attachments

IRS-2010-0010-0096.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=...

8/16/2010


8/9/10

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to
Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001). ,

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

Shelly S. Riley
#### Willoughby Derr, Appellant, v. Alonzo B. Cooley and others, Respondents.

Judgment as to the custody of the child affirmed, with costs of the action, prior ro the bringing of this appeal, to the defendants, and the judgment, so lar as it relates to compensation, reversed and a new trial ordered as to the issues on that subject before another referee, the costs of this appeal and of the new trial to abide the event. Opinion hy

Smith, P. J.
Aug. 22: U.S. Military Conducts Airstrikes Against ISIL near Mosul Dam
 By U.S. Central Command News Release
  August 22, 2014
Release #20140826 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE U.S. Military Conducts Airstrikes Against ISIL near Mosul Dam **TAMPA, Fla. —**
 U.S. military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in support of 
Iraqi Security Force operations, using fighter and attack aircraft to 
conduct three airstrikes in the vicinity of the Mosul Dam. The 
strikes destroyed two ISIL armed vehicles and a machine gun emplacement 
that was firing on Iraqi forces. All aircraft exited the strike area 
safely. These strikes were conducted under authority to support 
Iraqi security forces and Kurdish defense force operations, as well as 
to protect critical infrastructure, U.S. personnel and facilities, and 
support humanitarian efforts. Since Aug. 8, U.S. Central Command has conducted a total of 93 airstrikes across Iraq
§ 672.13 Designated personnel of public transportation agencies. ( a ) Each recipient that operates a rail fixed guideway public transportation system shall designate its personnel and contractors who are directly responsible for safety oversight and ensure their compliance with the applicable training requirements set forth in Appendix A to this part.
( b ) Each recipient that operates a bus or other public transportation system not subject to the safety oversight of another Federal agency may designate its personnel who are directly responsible for safety oversight to participate in the applicable training requirements as set forth in Appendix A to this part.
( c ) Personnel designated under paragraph (a) of this section shall complete applicable training requirements of this part within three (3) years of their initial designation. Thereafter, refresher training shall be completed every two (2) years. The recipient shall determine refresher training requirements which must include, at a minimum, one (1) hour of safety oversight training.
§ 604.22 Request for a cease and desist order. ( a ) An interested party may also request a cease and desist order as part of its request for an advisory opinion. A request for a cease and desist order shall contain the following information in addition to the information required for an advisory opinion: ( 1 ) A description of the need for the cease and desist order, a detailed description of the lost business opportunity the interested party is likely to suffer if the recipient performs the charter service in question, and how the public interest will be served by avoiding or ameliorating the lost business opportunity. A registered charter provider must distinguish its loss from that of other registered charter providers in the geographic service area.
( 2 ) A detailed description of the efforts made to notify the recipient of the potential violation of the charter service regulations. Include names, titles, phone numbers or e-mail addresses of persons contacted, date and times contact was made, and the response received, if any.
( b ) A request for a cease and desist order may be denied if: ( 1 ) The request contains incomplete information on which to base an informed a cease and desist order;
( 2 ) The Chief Counsel concludes that a cease and desist order cannot reasonably be given on the matter involved;
( 3 ) The matter is adequately covered by a prior a cease and desist order; or
( 4 ) The Chief Counsel otherwise concludes that a cease and desist order would not be in the public interest.
( c ) A recipient who is the subject of a request for a cease and desist order shall have three business days to respond to the request. The response shall include a point-by-point rebuttal to the information included in the request for a cease and desist order.
( d ) The time period for a response by the recipient begins once a registered charter provider files a request in the Advisory Opinion/Cease and Desist Order docket (FTA-2007-0023 at *http://www.regulations.gov*) or with the FTA Chief Counsel's Office, whichever date is sooner.
#### John G. Neal *et al. v.*Louis Sachs and Solomon Wile, *Appel*lants.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Opinion by

Hardin, J.
<PAGE>
Exhibit 10.4

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

$300,000.00                                                      August 26, 2003


         FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned AQUA DYNE, INC., a Delaware
corporation ("Payor") hereby promises to pay to the order of GLOBAL POWER &
WATER, INC., a Nevada corporation ("Global"), or its assignee ("Payee"), at such
place as Payee or any holder hereof may from time to time designate, the
principal sum of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000.00) with no interest
per annum. The principal hereof shall be due and payable on demand.

         Global may at its option elect to convert the principal amount of this
Note into common stock of Aqua Dyne, Inc. (OTCBB trading symbol "AQDY") at the
current market price (average of bid and ask prices) on the conversion date. In
such case, Global shall submit a conversion notice to the Payor.

         Payor may, at its option, at any time and from time to time, prepay all
or any part of the principal balance of this Note, without penalty or premium.

         This Note may not be changed, modified or terminated orally, but only
by an agreement in writing signed by the party to be charged.

         In the event the Payee or any holder hereof shall refer this Note to an
attorney for collection, Payor agrees to pay, in addition to unpaid principal
and interest, if any, all the costs and expenses incurred in attempting or
effecting collection hereunder, including reasonable attorneys' fees, whether or
not suit is instituted.

         In the event of any litigation with respect to this Note, Payor waives
the right to a trial by jury and all rights of set off and rights to interpose
counterclaims and cross-claims. Payor hereby irrevocably consents to the
jurisdiction of the courts of the State of California in connection with any
action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Note.

         This Note shall be governed by California law, without reference to any
choice of law principles thereof.

                                            "PAYOR"

                                            AQUA DYNE, INC.,
                                            a Delaware corporation


                                            By: _______________________________
                                                   John Ritter, President
1TSC OCP conducts NTV safety awareness training
 By Sgt. Connie Jones
  The 1st Theater Sustainment Command's Operational Command Post conducted a nontactical vehicle safety training event at Camp Arifjan, Kuwait, April 26, 2019. 






Staff Sgt. Damien Montgomery, 184th Sustainment Command, asks the audience a question about vehicle safety during nontactical vehicle training at Camp Arifjan, Kuwait, April 26, 2019. (U.S. Army National Guard photo by Sgt. Connie Jones) (Photo Credit: Sgt. Connie Jones)




Staff Sgt. Damien Montgomery, 184th Sustainment Command, asks the audience a question about vehicle safety during nontactical vehicle training at Camp Arifjan, Kuwait, April 26, 2019. (U.S. Army National Guard photo by Sgt. Connie Jones) (Photo Credit: Sgt. Connie Jones)
        1TSC OCP Conducts NTV Safety Awareness Training
            Staff Sgt. Damien Montgomery, 184th Sustainment Command, asks the audience a question about vehicle safety during nontactical vehicle training at Camp Arifjan, Kuwait, April 26, 2019. (U.S. Army National Guard photo by Sgt. Connie Jones) (Photo Credit: Sgt. Connie Jones)

            SHARE IMAGE:

                Download Image
                    Image Details
                    
                    Photo By: Sgt. Connie Jones
                    
                    VIRIN: 190426-A-TQ005-100The training discussed ways to be a defensive driver, the responsibilities of the assistant driver, and best practices while in the host country to keep everyone safe and ensure their safe return back to the base."A lot of people feel they should drive like the host nation but that's not the answer. When you're on the road here, you need to be aware of the drivers around you at all times. Drive defensively so that everyone comes back the way they left," said Mr. Minnick Eargle, 1st Theater Sutainment Command safety director.The training also included video footage of driving in the city, accidents that have been recorded, as well as eye-opening accident statistics."This training was a part of General Walker's intent. Safety trainings are to occur quarterly," said Chief Warrant Officer 4 David Hardigree, 184th Sustainment Command safety specialist.Drivers that are new to Kuwait often are unfamiliar with the local ways of the roads, which are similar to conditions in a major city."We don't want Soldier fatalities. We want to be proactive with safety awareness so that we're not playing catch up. We want everyone to arrive safely," said Eargle.The next safety awareness training for the unit will occur in June.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 33 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      February 8, 2001.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected the 
following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Appropriations: Mr. Fattah of Pennsylvania and Mr. Rothman of 
New Jersey.
    Committee on Agriculture: Mr. Larsen of Washington, Mr. Ross of Arkansas, 
and Mr. Acevedo-Vila of Puerto Rico.
    Committee on the Budget: Mrs. McCarthy of New York, Mr. Moore of Kansas, Mr. 
Capuano of Massachusetts, and Mr. Honda of California.
    Committee on Education and the Workforce: To rank after Mr. Holt of New 
Jersey, Ms. Solis of California, Mrs. Davis of California, and Ms. McCollum of 
Minnesota.
    Committee on Energy and Commerce: Mr. Doyle of Pennsylvania, Mr. John of 
Louisiana, and Ms. Harman of California.
    Committee on Financial Services: Mr. Ford of Tennessee, Mr. Hinojosa of 
Texas, Mr. Lucas of Kentucky, Mr. Shows of Mississippi, Mr. Crowley of New York, 
Mr. Clay of Missouri, Mr. Israel of New York, and Mr. Ross of Arkansas.
    Committee on Government Reform: Mr. Clay of Missouri.
    Committee on International Relations: Mr. Blumenauer of Oregon, Ms. Berkley 
of Nevada, Mrs. Napolitano of California, and Mr. Schiff of California.
    Committee on the Judiciary: Mr. Schiff of California.
    Committee on Resources: Mr. Rahall of West Virginia, Mr. Markey of 
Massachusetts, Mr. Kildee of Michigan, Mr. DeFazio of Oregon, Mr. Faleomavaega 
of American Samoa, Mr. Abercrombie of Hawaii, Mr. Ortiz of Texas, Mr. Pallone of 
New Jersey, Mr. Dooley of California, Mr. Underwood of Guam, Mr. Smith of 
Washington, Ms. Christensen of the Virgin Islands, Mr. Kind of Wisconsin, Mr. 
Inslee of Washington, Mrs. Napolitano of California, Mr. Udall of New Mexico, 
Mr. Udall of Colorado, Mr. Holt of New Jersey, Mr. McGovern of Massachusetts, 
Mr. Acevedo-Vila of Puerto Rico, Ms. Solis of California, Mr. Carson of 
Oklahoma, and Ms. McCollum of Minnesota.
    Committee on Science: Mr. Matheson of Utah and Mr. Israel of New York.
    Committee on Small Business: Mr. Langevin of Rhode Island.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 478

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to

implementing the Medicine Equity and Drug Safety Act of 2000.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 10, 2002

Mr. BERRY (for himself, Mrs. EMERSON, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. POMEROY,

Mr. BOSWELL, and Mr. ALLEN) submitted the following resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with

respect to implementing the Medicine Equity and Drug

Safety Act of 2000.

Whereas Americans fill approximately 3.0 billion prescriptions each year at a cost of almost $117 billion;

Whereas prescription drug spending is projected to continue

to increase at a rate of approximately 17 percent per

year;

Whereas brand-name prescription drug prices have doubled

since 1990;

Whereas average prescription drug prices continue to increase

at a rate three times as high as general inflation and

twice as high as medical inflation;
2

•HRES 478 IH

Whereas drug prices are two times to ten times more expensive in the United States than they are in other countries;

Whereas the Medicine Equity and Drug Safety Act of 2000

(‘‘MEDS Act’’) was enacted pursuant to section 745 of

the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act,

2001 (enacted by reference by Public Law 106–387)(114

Stat. 1549A–35); and

Whereas the MEDS Act would allow pharmacists and drug

wholesalers to import less costly prescription drugs into

the United States from FDA-approved manufacturing facilities in Canada and other countries: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives urges

2 the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consulta3 tion with the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, to imple4 ment the Medicine Equity and Drug Safety Act of 2000

5 in order to provide less costly prescription drugs to Amer6 ican consumers.

Æ