Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 123 / Monday, June 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules 36583 

visual inspections would be done, and 

that 49 MGBs would be replaced. 

Regulatory Findings 

We have determined that this 

proposed AD would not have federalism 

implications under Executive Order 

13132. Additionally, this proposed AD 

would not have a substantial direct 

effect on the States, on the relationship 

between the national Government and 

the States, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that the proposed regulation: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 

3. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

We prepared an economic evaluation 

of the estimated costs to comply with 

this proposed AD. See the AD docket to 

examine the economic evaluation. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in subtitle VII, 

part A, subpart III, section 44701, 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Safety, Incorporation by 

reference. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

2. Section 39.13 is amended by 

removing Amendment 39–13965 (70 FR 

7382, February 14, 2005), and adding 

the following new AD: 

Eurocopter France: Docket No. FAA–2010– 

0610; Directorate Identifier 2009–SW– 

47–AD. Supersedes AD 2005–03–09; 

Docket No. FAA–2005–20294; 

Directorate Identifier 2004–SW–39–AD. 

Applicability 

Model EC 155B, EC155B1, SA–360C, SA– 

365C, SA–365C1, SA–365C2, SA–365N, SA– 

365N1, AS–365N2, AS 365 N3, and SA– 

366G1 helicopters, certificated in any 

category. 

Compliance 

Required as indicated. 

For a main gearbox (MGB) that has: Inspect: 

(1) Less than 250 hours time-in-service (TIS) since new or last overhaul.On or before the MGB reaches 35 hours TIS, unless accomplished 

previously, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 50 hours TIS. 

(2) 250 or more hours TIS since new or last overhaul ............................ Within 15 hours TIS, unless accomplished previously, and thereafter at 

intervals not to exceed 50 hours TIS. 

To detect a crack in the web of the planet 

gear carrier, which could lead to a MGB 

seizure and subsequent loss of control of the 

helicopter, accomplish the following: 

(a) Either borescope inspect the web of the 

MGB planet gear carrier for a crack in 

accordance with the Operational Procedure, 

paragraphs 2.B.2. through 2.B.2.a.1, of 

Eurocopter Emergency Alert Service Bulletin 

(EASB) No. 05A007, Revision 2; No. 

05.00.48, Revision 3; No. 05.26, Revision 2; 

or No. 05.33, Revision 2; as applicable to 

your model helicopter, or visually inspect the 

MGB planet gear carrier in accordance with 

the Operational Procedure, paragraphs 2.B.3. 

through paragraph 2.B.3.a.1, of the EASB 

applicable to your model helicopter. Each 

EASB at the stated revision level is dated 

November 16, 2009. 

(b) If a crack is found in the planet gear 

carrier, replace the MGB with an airworthy 

MGB before further flight. 

(c) To request a different method of 

compliance or a different compliance time 

for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 

39.19. Contact the Manager, Safety 

Management Group, FAA, ATTN: Gary 

Roach, Aviation Safety Engineer, Rotorcraft 

Directorate, FAA, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort 

Worth, Texas 76137, telephone (817) 222– 

5130, fax (817) 222–5961, for information 

about previously approved alternative 

methods of compliance. 

(d) The Joint Aircraft System/Component 

(JASC) Code is 6320: Main Rotor Gearbox. 

Note: The subject of this AD is addressed 

in European Aviation Safety Agency AD No. 

2007–0288–E, dated November 15, 2007. 

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on June 16, 

2010. 

Gwendolynne O’Connell, 

Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–15370 Filed 6–25–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2010–0267; Airspace 

Docket No. 10–AGL–5] 

Proposed Amendment of Class E 

Airspace; Youngstown, OH 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: This action proposes to 

amend Class E airspace at Youngstown, 

OH, adding additional controlled 

airspace necessary to accommodate new 

Standard Instrument Approach 

Procedures (SIAPs) at Youngstown Elser 

Metro Airport, Youngstown, OH. The 

FAA is taking this action to enhance the 

safety and management of Instrument 

Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the 

airport. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
36584 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 123 / Monday, June 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before August 12, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this 

proposal to the U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

Washington, DC 20590–0001. You must 

identify the docket number FAA–2010– 

0267/Airspace Docket No. 10–AGL–5, at 

the beginning of your comments. You 

may also submit comments through the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the proposal, any comments 

received, and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office between 9 

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. The 

Docket Office (telephone 1–800–647– 

5527), is on the ground floor of the 

building at the above address. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Scott Enander, Central Service Center, 

Operations Support Group, Federal 

Aviation Administration, Southwest 

Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort 

Worth, TX 76137; telephone: 817–321– 

7716. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

Interested parties are invited to 

participate in this proposed rulemaking 

by submitting such written data, views, 

or arguments, as they may desire. 

Comments that provide the factual basis 

supporting the views and suggestions 

presented are particularly helpful in 

developing reasoned regulatory 

decisions on the proposal. Comments 

are specifically invited on the overall 

regulatory, aeronautical, economic, 

environmental, and energy-related 

aspects of the proposal. 

Communications should identify both 

docket numbers and be submitted in 

triplicate to the address listed above. 

Commenters wishing the FAA to 

acknowledge receipt of their comments 

on this notice must submit with those 

comments a self-addressed, stamped 

postcard on which the following 

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to 

Docket No. FAA–2010–0267/Airspace 

Docket No. 10–AGL–5.’’ The postcard 

will be date/time stamped and returned 

to the commenter. 

Availability of NPRMs 

An electronic copy of this document 

may be downloaded through the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Recently published rulemaking 

documents can also be accessed through 

the FAA’s Web page at http:// 

www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/ 

air_traffic/publications/ 

airspace_amendments/. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the proposal, any comments 

received and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office (see 

‘‘ADDRESSES’’ section for address and 

phone number) between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. An informal docket 

may also be examined during normal 

business hours at the office of the 

Central Service Center, 2601 Meacham 

Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137. 

Persons interested in being placed on 

a mailing list for future NPRMs should 

contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking 

202–267–9677, to request a copy of 

Advisory Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking Distribution 

System, which describes the application 

procedure. 

The Proposal 

This action proposes to amend Title 

14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 

CFR), Part 71 by adding additional Class 

E airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface for SIAPs at 

Youngstown Elser Metro Airport, 

Youngstown, OH. Controlled airspace is 

needed for the safety and management 

of IFR operations at the airport. 

Class E airspace areas are published 

in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 

7400.9T, dated August 27, 2009, and 

effective September 15, 2009, which is 

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class E airspace designation 

listed in this document would be 

published subsequently in the Order. 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current. It, 

therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ under Executive 

Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant 

rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies 

and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 

26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant 

preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation 

as the anticipated impact is so minimal. 

Since this is a routine matter that will 

only affect air traffic procedures and air 

navigation, it is certified that this rule, 

when promulgated, will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, 

section 106 describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the agency’s 

authority. This rulemaking is 

promulgated under the authority 

described in subtitle VII, part A, subpart 

I, section 40103. Under that section, the 

FAA is charged with prescribing 

regulations to assign the use of airspace 

necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft 

and the efficient use of airspace. This 

regulation is within the scope of that 

authority as it would add additional 

controlled airspace at Youngstown Elser 

Metro Airport, Youngstown, OH. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (Air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as 

follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9T, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, signed August 27, 2009, and 

effective September 15, 2009, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace areas 

extending upward from 700 feet or more 

above the surface of the earth. 

* * * * * 

AGL OH E5 Youngstown Elser Metro 

Airport, OH [Amended] 

Youngstown Elser Metro Airport, OH 

(Lat. 40°57′42′′ N., long. 80°40′38′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile 

radius of Youngstown Elser Metro Airport, 

and within 4 miles each side of the 108° 

bearing from the airport extending from the 

6.4-mile radius to 8.8 miles east of the 

airport, and within 4 miles each side of the 

091° bearing from the airport extending from 

the 6.4-mile radius to 9.5 miles east of the 

airport, and within 4 miles each side of the 

270° bearing from the airport extending from 

the 6.4-mile radius to 10.9 miles west of the 

airport. 

Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on June 16, 2010. 

Anthony D. Roetzel, 

Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO 

Central Service Center. 

[FR Doc. 2010–15647 Filed 6–25–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4901–13–P 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS