alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Belknap,

Dec., 1895.

#### Gilford *v.*Munsey *& a.*

Debt, in this and four other cases, on bonds given by Munsey as tax collector for the town of Gilford in 1890 and 1891, by Taylor as tax collector for the town of Gilford in 1892, and by Blaisdell as tax collector for that part of Gilford known as School District No. 13 in 1890 and 1891, to recover certain taxes which were uncollected March 1, 1893. The question at issue was whether these taxes belonged to Gilford, or were payable to the city of Laconia, which became party to the proceedings.

The act of March 24, 1893, establishing the city of Laconia (Laws 1893, c. 241), disannexed certain territory from Gilford and annexed it to Laconia, designated this territory Ward 6, specified that certain property should belong to Gilford, and provided, among other things, that Ward 6 should “ have and own all the other corporate assets and property of the present town of Gilford.” *lb., s.*6.

It was held that the defendants had offered no legal defence to the actions on the bonds, and that, as to them, the town of Gilford was entitled to judgment with costs; that as between Laconia and Gilford, the former was entitled to the taxes; and

*610
      *Sargent Hollis,*for the plaintiffs.

*Stephen S. Jeioett,*for the defendants and Laconia.

a motion that the taxable costs be paid out of the fund was denied, on the ground that such an order would compel the payment of costs by the prevailing party.

*Decree accordingly.*

Parsons, J., did not sit.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                        VISTA MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Data

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                           THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                           ----------------------------
                                                               1999            1998
                                                           ------------    ------------
<S>                                                        <C>             <C>
Net income (loss) .....................................    $ (2,669,331)   $ (4,167,206)
Weighted average common shares outstanding ............      13,485,430      13,248,379
                                                           ------------    ------------
Shares used in basic and diluted loss per share .......      13,485,430      13,248,379
                                                           ------------    ------------
                                                           ------------    ------------
Basic and diluted loss per share ......................    $      (0.20)   $      (0.31)
                                                           ------------    ------------
                                                           ------------    ------------
</TABLE>
                                          28
--

August 9, 2010 

Office ofConsumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department ofHealth and Human Services 

Attention: OCII0-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 


Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 


Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status 

as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

~-- ......--... -- --.;,.----~ 

As a co~umer I wish to take this opportunity to formally com.tI1.;;'i on ­

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-2010­

0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part ofthe new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number ofindividuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PP ACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 

be wejlkened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation ofthese

•

regulations. 

Sal Donnita / 

(J{,rJ-~l 'J I 

',/ 

.f: .f· ... ~ , 

• 1 

. ~t·,~, , '. , J. ' • 

., .. . " 

~ r \ " , /. f
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 59 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 59

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary in 
                   the One Hundred Seventh Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 2001

    Mr. Sensenbrenner submitted the following resolution; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary in 
                   the One Hundred Seventh Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary (hereafter in 
this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $15,490,248 for the One Hundred 
Seventh Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

     Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $7,595,624 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2001, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2002; and
             (2) not more than $7,894,624 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2002, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2003.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

     Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers 
authorized by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, 
and approved in the manner directed by the Committee on House 
Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

     Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
#### Aaron Richardson, *Appellant, v.*Thomas B. Morrow, *Respondent.*

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements. — Mem. by

Boardman, J.;

Learned, P. J., not acting.
Task Force 59 Welcomes New Commander during Ceremony in Jordan
 
  By Lt. j.g. Sofia Gross, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command Public Affairs
  U.S. 5th Fleet’s task force for rapidly integrating unmanned systems and artificial intelligence into maritime operations welcomed a new commander during a change of command ceremony in Aqaba, Jordan, March 15. Capt. Colin Corridan relieved Capt. Michael Brasseur as the commander of Task Force 59 during a pierside ceremony attended by members of U.S. 5th Fleet and the Royal Jordanian Navy. Brasseur assumed command of Task Force 59 in September 2021, when the new task force was established. Over the last 18 months, the staff has achieved full operational capability, amassing more than 30,000 operating hours with advanced unmanned surface vessels and completing nearly 20 bilateral and multilateral exercises. Additionally, under Brasseur’s leadership, Task Force 59 has overseen unmanned systems operations on every side of the Arabian Peninsula as well as in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. “It's been the joy of my professional life to design and build Task Force 59 with my incredibly talented team of innovators, leaders and doers,” said Brasseur. “Never before have I seen so few do so much, so fast. It's been a true honor to serve.” Corridan assumes command of a 30-member staff after previously serving as commanding officer of USS Cincinnati (LCS 20). The Task Force 59 team includes representatives from seven countries, demonstrating U.S. 5th Fleet’s expanded engagement with regional partners through new technology integration. “It is an honor to be named as the commodore of such a historic task force,” said Corridan. “It is an inspiring mission, and I look forward to seeing all we will do together and with our partners as one team.” Task Force 59 is currently spearheading an effort to form a multinational fleet of 100 unmanned surface vessels based in the Middle East by end of the summer. U.S. 5th Fleet announced in February the task force and regional partners have approached the halfway point toward that goal. The U.S. 5th Fleet operating area includes 21 countries, the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, Red Sea, parts of the Indian Ocean and three critical choke points at the Strait of Hormuz, Bab al-Mandeb and Suez Canal.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM

We consent to
the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-105180, No.
33-51990, No. 333-44333, No. 33-62087, No. 33-57060, No. 33-20880, and No.
33-34619 on Form S-8 of our reports dated September 13, 2010 relating to (1)
the consolidated financial statements of Zygo Corporation and subsidiaries (the
Company) (which report expresses (1) an unqualified opinion on the
consolidated financial statements and (2) an adverse opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting
because of a material weakness) and (2) the consolidated financial statement
schedule of the Company appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the
Company for the year ended June 30, 2010.

/s/ Deloitte
& Touche LLP

Hartford, Connecticut
September 13, 2010

---
Sullivan,

Dec., 1900.

#### Paul, *Adm'r, v.*Dole *& a.*

'Where a testator bequeaths all his property to his wile during her natural life, and disposes of “ what may be left ” at her decease, she can take no more than a life estate, in the absence of evidence as to the nature and extent of the property, the relationship of the legatees to the testator, and other circumstances tending to show the standpoint in which the language was used.

Bill in Equity, for a construction of tlie following provision in the will of Charles H. Dole, in respect to the rights of Amanda L. Dole: “ I give and bequeath to my wife, Amanda L. Dole, all the real estate and personal property that 1 possess, and all money, during her natural life; after her decease, I will what may be left to Clara A. Dole during her natural life; after her decease, I will and bequeath Mrs. Olen D. Cram one thousand dollars, and to Susan M. Hall one thousand dollars; if after the above there should anything remain, I bequeath to the following persons, Mrs. Mary E. Dresser, Charles F. Webster, to be equally divided.”

*Hose,a W. Parker,*for the plaintiff.

*Amanda P. Pole, pro se.*

Chase, J.

Tlie extent of Amanda’s interest in the real estate left by the testator, if any, does not concern the plaintiff, and so cannot be determined in this suit. *Ellis*v. *Aldrich, ante, p.*219.

The terms of the will are the only evidence submitted upon the question of the testator’s intention in respect to Amanda’s interest in the personal property. They correctly describe a life estate. The only fact that can raise a doubt that this was the estate intended is the use of the words “ what may be left ” to describe tlie remainder bequeathed after the decease of Amanda. There may be an implication in these words that the life tenant was to have the right to use some of the principal of the property as well as the income; but in the absence of evidence as to the nature and extent of the property, the relationship of the legatees to the testator, and other circumstances tending to show the standpoint hi which the words were used *(Stratton*v. Stratton, 68 N. H. 582, 586), it cannot be found that the intent was to give Amanda anything more that a life estate.

*Case discharged.*

All concurred.
# U.S. Air Force’s F-35A Lightning II arrives for first Middle East deployment

/ Published April 15, 2019
AL DHAFRA AIR BASE, United Arab Emirates, 
The U.S. Air Force’s fifth generation multi-role aircraft arrived for its first deployment to the Middle East on April 15, 2019. The F-35A Lightning IIs are from active duty 388th and reserve 419th Fighter Wings at Hill Air Force Base, Utah.As the first deployment to the U.S. Air Forces Central Command area of responsibility, crews are prepared and trained for the AFCENT mission. The F-35A, the conventional takeoff and landing variant of the Joint Strike Fighter, provides greater operational capability by combining advanced stealth capabilities with the latest weapons technology.“We are adding a cutting edge weapons system to our arsenal that significantly enhances the capability of the coalition,” said Lt. Gen. Joseph T. Guastella, commander of U.S. Air Forces Central Command. “The sensor fusion and survivability this aircraft provides to the joint force will enhance security and stability across the theater and deter aggressors.”The F-35A is designed with the entire battlespace in mind, and is intended to fuse, integrate and share data with other battlefield assets. It has one of the most powerful and comprehensive integrated sensor packages. It improves lethality, survivability and adaptability against emerging threats in order to maintain air superiority.“The F-35A provides our nation air dominance in any threat,” said Gen. David L. Goldfein, Chief of Staff of the Air Force. “When it comes to having a ‘quarterback’ for the coalition joint force, the inter-operable F-35A is clearly the aircraft for the leadership role,” he stated.The F-35A has previously deployed to Royal Air Force Lakenheath in April 2017, as well as the U.S. Pacific Command area of responsibility in the fall of 2017.“We look forward to demonstrating the full range of the F-35A’s capabilities while it increases the interoperability of our forces throughout the region,” said Guastella.
#### § 583.3 Applicability.

This part applies to manufacturers of new passenger motor vehicles manufactured or imported for sale in the United States, suppliers of passenger motor vehicle equipment, and dealers of new passenger motor vehicles.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                   |   |                                                              |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                   |   |                                                              |   |
| Dated:           March 31, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Roger G. Little                                     |   |
|                                                                                   |   | Roger G. Little                                              |   |
|                                                                                   |   | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President |   |
|                                                                                   |   | (Principle Executive Officer)                                     |   |
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.38 MB)
 
 Kandahar Afghanistan National Army 4th Infantry Division Train U.S. Army Forces Command 2nd Infantry Brigade Combat Team FORSCOM 40th Infantry Division 1st Security Force Assistance Brigade U.S. Army 2nd Battalion Afghanistan ANA Advise and Assist Command-South California National Guard Regional Military Training Center-Kandahar Medical Evacuation Exercise XVIII Airborne Corps
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Writ of Habeas Corpus Dismissed, Opinion issued February 20, 2013 

# S

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

─── ─ ─── ─── ─── ───── ─── ───── ──

No. 05

- 13

- 00168

- CV

─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─

IN RE DAVID MATTHEWS, Relator

══ ══ ══ ═ ═════ ═ ═ ════ ════ ═ ══ ══ ═══ ══ ═════ ═══ ═════ ═══ ═════ ═══ ═════ Original Proceeding from the 291 st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F10

- 45774

═ ═══ ═ ═══ ═ ═══ ═ ═══ ═ ═══ ═ ═ ═ ══ ═

═══ ══ ═══ ══ ═══ ══ ═══ ═

════ ═══ ═════ ════



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Bef ore Justices Bridges, Murphy, and Lewis

Opinion by Justice Bridges

Before the Court is relator = s petition for habeas corpus complaining of that an affidavit of

probable cause used in his case was void. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we

need not recount them herein. This Court has no jurisdiction over habeas corpus proceedin gs in

which the relator seeks relief from a felony judgment after final conviction. See T EX

. C ODE C RIM

.

P ROC

. A NN

. Art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2010). Accordingly, we DISMISS relator = s petition for a writ

of habeas corpus for want of jurisdiction.

/s/ David L. Bridges

DAVID L. BRIDGES

JUSTICE

130168F.P05
"'<:1; 

< • 	Aupst 9~ 20LO 

0ffice ofConsumer Information and Insurance Oversight ... Department ofHealth and Hwnan Services 

Attention: 0Cll0-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 


. Baltimore, MD 2]244-]850 


Re: Interim Final Ru]e for Group Health Plans and Health Insmance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfirthered HeaJtb PJan Under the Patient Protedioo and Affordable Care Act 

As a consomec I wish to 1ake this opportunity to forma]ly comment 00 

the interim final role regarding bealth plans and ""grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-201 0­ .~-,..:. .oo] n_nnn]) - -- . 	 . - ~- -"'" - .---..----- --- - - U"vVV' , •.• -	 ­ ... -.­

I believe the consomec protections included as part ofthe new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Acoordingly" evety effort 

should be made to increase the number ofindi1riduals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or oonditions that would 

extend these protedions to consumers under currently existing ""gr.mdfatheredn plans shoold not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the positioo and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with :respect to the implementation ofthese 

regolations. 

Loretta Briggs 

;:h~u-c;&u!fJ 

I 

i

i 

I 

I
EXHIBIT
32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, J. Bruce Robinson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Annual Report of Zygo Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Zygo Corporation.

A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to Zygo Corporation and will be retained by
Zygo Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

| |                             | 
| | --------------------------- | 
| | Dated:
  September 11, 2006
| |                            
| | /s/ J. Bruce Robinson      
| |                             | 
| | J. Bruce Robinson          
| | Chairman, President, and   
| | Chief Executive Officer of 
| | Zygo Corporation           

---