alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Quarter Ended September 30,           Six Months Ended September 30,
                                                        --------------------------------        ---------------------------------
                                                          1997                 1996                1997               1996
                                                        ---------             ---------          ---------          ---------
<S>                                                     <C>                   <C>                <C>                <C>      
Net income (loss) applicable to common stock                 
  and common stock equivalents (in thousands)                $969               ($4,557)            $1,807            ($3,638)
                                                        =========             =========          =========          =========

Primary Earnings (Loss) Per Share
  Average shares of common stock outstanding            5,435,349             2,935,267          4,221,247          2,882,369
  Common stock equivalents                                 40,718                10,702             48,279              7,192
                                                        ---------             ---------          ---------          ---------
                                                        5,476,067             2,945,969          4,269,526          2,889,561
                                                        =========             =========          =========          =========

  Primary Earnings (Loss) Per Share                         $0.18                $(1.55)             $0.42             $(1.26)
                                                        =========             =========          =========          =========

Fully Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share
  Average shares of common stock outstanding            5,435,349             2,935,267          4,221,247          2,882,369
  Common stock equivalents of stock options                37,366                15,799             38,302             15,799
                                                        ---------             ---------          ---------          ---------
                                                        5,472,715             2,951,066          4,259,549          2,898,168
                                                        =========             =========          =========          =========

  Fully Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share                   $0.18                $(1.54)             $0.42             $(1.26)
                                                        =========             =========          =========          =========
</TABLE>

Note: Per share data reflect the Company's Reorganization and Stock Offering
      completed August 22, 1997 and the issuance of 4,869,190 shares of common
      stock in connection with its Conversion and Reorganization. Prior per per
      share data have not been adjusted for the shares issued in the Conversion
      and Reorganization.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30540 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ERIC KYLES, also known as Dybees, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 99-CR-253-1-F

- - - - - - - - - - February 20, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Eric Kyles appeals his guilty-plea conviction for one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and six counts of use of a communication facility to facilitate the commission of a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He was convicted of these charges in the Eastern District of Louisiana. Kyles argues that his prosecution and conviction violate the Double Jeopardy Clause because he also was prosecuted and convicted in the Southern District of Alabama for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and cocaine base, whichNo. 01-30540 -2- he contends was part of the same drug conspiracy. See U.S. C ONST . amend. V. Kyles also contends that his sentence in the Louisiana case was fundamentally unfair because the district court did not consider his cooperation with the Government in the Alabama case. The Double Jeopardy Clause protects against a second prosecution after acquittal or conviction and against multiple punishments for the same offense. See Franshaw v. Lynaugh , 810 F.2d 518, 523 (5th Cir. 1987). “Naturally, no question of double jeopardy arises unless jeopardy has first attached sometime prior to what the defendant seeks to characterize as the ‘second’ prosecution.” Id. at 523. If a defendant pleads guilty, jeopardy attaches when the plea is accepted. Id. Because jeopardy attached first in the Louisiana proceedings, Kyles cannot establish a double jeopardy violation from his conviction and sentence in Louisiana. Additionally, his assertion that his sentence was fundamentally unfair is without merit. Therefore, we AFFIRM Kyles’ conviction and sentence. Upon reconsideration, Kyles’ motion to supplement the record is GRANTED.
MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD GRANTED; AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 12



ALPHAMA INC. and SUBSIDIARIES



COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



(In thousands, except for ratio data)



|                                                                           | 1999    | 2000     | 2001(1)   | 2002(1)    | 2003   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | -------- | --------- | ---------- | -------
|                                                                           |         |          |           |            |        
|Income (loss) from continuing operations before provision for income taxes | $45,654 | $76,028  | $(37,136) | $(156,282) | $24,121
|Add:                                                                       |         |          |           |            |        
|Portion of rents representative of    the interest factor                  | 2,276   | 3,055    | 3,343     | 4,189      | 4,689  
|Interest on indebtedness                                                   | 39,174  | 45,183   | 45,467    | 71,496     | 59,667 
|Amortization of debt expense                                               | 1,643   | 2,070    | 6,022     | 4,727      | 3,941  
|Amortization of interest capitalized                                       | 457     | 455      | 450       | 335        | 23     
|                                                                           |         |          |           |            |        
|Income (loss) as adjusted                                                  | $89,204 | $126,791 | $18,146   | $(75,535)  | $92,441
|                                                                           |         |          |           |            |        
|Fixed charges                                                              |         |          |           |            |        
|Interest on indebtedness (a)                                               | $39,174 | $45,183  | $ 45,467  | $ 71,496   | $59,667
|Interest capitalized (b)                                                   | 325     | 1,265    | 2,232     | 1,904      | 167    
|Amortization of debt expense (c)                                           | 1,643   | 2,070    | 6,022     | 4,727      | 3,941  
|Rent expense                                                               | 6,827   | 9,164    | 10,029    | 12,567     | 14,068 
|Portion of rents representative of    the interest factor (d)              | 2,276   | 3,055    | 3,343     | 4,189      | 4,689  
|                                                                           |         |          |           |            |        
|Fixed charges (a+b+c+d)                                                    | $43,418 | $51,573  | $57,064   | $82,316    | $68,464
|                                                                           |         |          |           |            |        
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                         | 2.05    | 2.46     | 0.32      | -0.92      | 1.35   

(1)	Earnings in 2001 and 2002 were not sufficient to cover fixed charges.  The deficiency of earnings was $38,918 in 2001 and $157,851 in 2002.
From: Ariel Hou
To: EL-Zoobi, Majd Cc: Anthony Gaglione ; Kurt Rindfusz Subject: OSHA FOIA Request - Description of Events
Date: Thursday, April 25, 2013 1:17:21 PM

Majd,

Below is the sequence of events that occurred with the Tennessee OSHA pertaining to our FOIA request of the inspection reports:

9/23/2010 1:14PM - Ariel Hou of ERG sent a FOIA request via email to Mike Maenza of Tennessee OSHA to request 4 inspection reports. The purpose of the request was to obtain information related to the manufacturing process, PPE, engineering controls, and worker activities in support of a project conducted for the USEPA.

9/29/2010 12:08PM - In response to the FOIA request, Mr. Maenza provided the Bushline Inc. inspection report via email. Mr. Maenza indicated the photographs were too large to be sent electronically, but is providing the narrative/citation portion of the reports.

9/29/2010 12:08PM - Mr. Maenza provided the England Inc. inspection report via email. 9/29/2010 12:09PM - Mr. Maenza provided the Commercial Furniture Group inspection report via email. 9/29/2010 12:10PM - Mr. Maenza provided the Harris-Tarkett Inc. inspection report via email. 9/29/2010 11:12AM - ERG sent an email to Mr. Maenza to inquire the possibility to obtain a hardcopy of the photographs. 9/29/2010 12:31PM - Mr. Maenza replied and stated the photographs would have to be redacted.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Ariel Hou, P.E. Chemical Engineer ERG 14555 Avion Pkwy, Suite 200 Chantilly, VA 20151 (703) 633-1713
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual
Report of Coastal Caribbean Oils & Minerals, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Phillip
W. Ware, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of and for the period covered by the Report.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                       
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 22, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Phillip W. Ware                                                                   
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Phillip W. Ware                                                                       
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer Accounting Officer
-----Original Message----- 

From: Margaret [mailto:margarethd@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 6:02 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: 2010 Investment Advice Proposed Rule 

The biggest favor to do for investors is get rid of 401s altogether; or 

keep them for those who want them and let the rest of us invest in 

retirement vehicles using equities/bonds of our own choosing. 

Margaret Dower 

1112 Highland St. 

Houston TX 77009
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 4- 33 96

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Detr ic k Lo ck rid ge ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v. Per M ar Se cu rit y

& Res earc h C or

p. ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll ee

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Dis tri ctof M in ne so ta - Mi nn eap ol is

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: May 6, 20 15 Fi le d: May 13, 2 01 5 [Un publ is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re COLLOTON, BYE andSHEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.
Detr ic k Loc kr id ge ap pe al s th e di st ric t c o u r t ’s ad ve rs e gr an t of su m m ary 1 jud gm en t in hi s act io n ag ai ns t hi s fo rm er em pl oyer, in w h i c h he as se rte d cl ai m s of
The Hon or ab le Mi ch ael J. Dav is , Ch ie f Ju dg e, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Co ur t fo r 1 th e Dis tri ctof M in ne so ta
.un la wfu l di sc riminat io n an d ret al ia ti on . Upo n care fu l de no vo rev ie w, we co nc lu de

th at th e di st ric t co ur t’s de ci si on was co rrec t. See Torg ers on v. Ci ty of Ro ch es te r, 64 3 F.3 d 10 31 , 10 42 -4 3 (8t h Cir. 20 11 ) (en ba nc ) (s ta nd ardof r ev ie w); s ee al so Mo od y v. Voz el , 77 1 F.3 d 10 93 , 10 97 (8 th Ci r. 2 0 1 4 ) ( d i sc us si ng st an da rd s ap pl ic ab le to cl ai m of di sc riminat ory te rm in at io n) , pe ti ti on fo r cert
. fil ed , –– U.S.L.W

. –– (U.S. Apr

. 23 , 20 15 ) (No

. 14 -1 27 1) ; Al v a r e z v. Des Mo in es Bo lt Supp ly, In c., 62 6 F.3 d 41 0, 41 6- 18 (8 th Ci r. 20 10 ) (d is cu ss in g st an da rd s ap pl ic ab le to cl ai m o f un la wfu l ret al ia ti on ).
Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
## Our mission is to rehabilitate injured bald eagles

and other birds of prey, to educate the public and

to conduct bald eagle research.

Board of Directors

Paula Scott

Board Chairman

Principal, Scott Insurance

Silverdale, WA

Diana Fowler

Vice Chair

Volunteer Bird Handler

Gig Harbor, WA

Roger Hames

Secretary / Treasurer

President, Hames

Corporation

Sitka, AK

Max Rule, CPA, CGMA

Hames, Corp

Sitka, AK

Jeff Davis

President

Blue Cross Blue Shield

of Alaska

Anchorage, AK

Rodney Vaught, MD

Shelton, WA

Sam Kito

President

Kito Inc.

Juneau, AK

Bill Pedlar,

President, Knightly Tours

Bellevue, WA

Linda Huston

Director, Southeast Alaska

an d Yukon

Holland America &

Gray Line of Alaska

Seattle, WA

Tim Thompson

Mgr

– Public Affairs

Alaska Airlines

Anchorage, AK

Liam Royce

Attorney at Law

Anchorage, AK

Board Member Emeritus 

## August 29, 2014

To Whom it May Concern;

This letter is to speak to the important role that Harris Air plays in our

region and the lives of those who live here. S.E. Alaska is dependent

on air travel for many things in our lives from receiving groceries to

reaching lifesaving medical care. Many communities have no hospital

or doctor and must commute to one of the larger communities for

services such as these.

For many years, Harris Air has answered the needs of our region by

providing regular air service to these remote locations. They are

always willing and ha ppy to help when unusual needs pop up as well.

The Alaska Raptor Center receives many calls of injured raptors

around our region. When the call is to one of the smaller communities

Harris Air has always been more than accommodating in helping get

these i njured birds back to Sitka, and without them these birds would

have been left to die.

They also help support many and varied organizations through

contributions to fundraising as well as in

- kind contributions, such as

delivering injured birds to us!

We would like to voice our support for Harris Air to receive their Air

Carrier Certificate in order to allow them more flexibility with their

scheduling. Their success means success to many others throughout

our region.

Warm regards

Debbie Reeder

Execut ive Director
|   | (1)    | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three month period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|   | (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                       |

| Date: July 22, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Pamela Griffin                                             |   |
|---------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                |   | Pamela Griffin                                                 |   |
|                |   | Chief Financial Officer                                        |   |
|                |   | (Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |   |
NAVCENT Hosts Maritime Course for Regional Partners in Bahrain
 
  By Chief Petty Officer Sandi Grimnes Moreno
  U.S. Naval Forces Central Command (NAVCENT) and instructors from the Naval War College in Newport, Rhode Island are co-hosting the Combined Force Maritime Component Commander (CFMCC) officer course at Naval Support Activity Bahrain through Aug. 18.
The CFMCC course is a senior officer-level professional military education seminar designed to provide leadership tools to U.S. and partner-nation naval leaders that will help improve multilateral coordination.
“In such a dynamic and vast maritime region, relationships are essential,” said Vice Adm. Brad Cooper, commander of NAVCENT, U.S. 5th Fleet and Combined Maritime Forces. “We are thrilled to again host regional leaders for this weeklong course and discuss opportunities for greater collaboration.”
This is the ninth time the CFMCC course has been held in Bahrain after the previous iteration in 2019. This year’s students represent nations from the Middle East, Europe, Indo-Pacific and North America.
Instructors and speakers are presenting on maritime security, strategy, multinational operations. Students will also discuss regional challenges and future opportunities for deepening maritime security cooperation.
“The participants recognize the need to be able to work together because the seas are not barriers that separate our nations; they are a great global common that connect us all,” said retired Rear Adm. Ed Cashman, the dean of the College of Maritime Operational Warfare at the Naval War College.
NAVCENT is headquartered in Bahrain with two major international partnerships: Combined Maritime Forces, the largest naval partnership in the world with 34 member nations; and the International Maritime Security Construct, a nine-nation coalition established in 2019 to address increased threats to freedom of navigation for merchant mariners transiting international waters in the Middle East.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of2 ruT (\ )I? I 2- --- / b 

AUG 2 5 20m 1\ G Q-­

!.LEGAL PftOCESSING DIVISION 


PUBLtCATlON &. REGULATIONS 
 ~ BRANCH 


As of: August 25, 2010 

Received: August 10, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 25, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2d075 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, ~:01O 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Statu!; as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-201O-001O-0344 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: Paul Monteagudo 

Address: 

57 MIDDLESEX ST 

QUINCY, MA, 02171 

Email: pmonty@verizon.net 

General Comment 

August 10, 2010 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status 

as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-20lCl0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

https:llfdms.erulemaking.net!fdms-web-agency/ component! submitter InfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/25/2010 
Page 2 of2 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these 

regulations. 

Paul Monteagudo 

https:/Ifdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency IcomponentisubmitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/25/2010