alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# U.S. Launches New Unmanned & AI Systems Integration Event

/ Published Nov. 23, 2022
MANAMA, Bahrain, 
U.S. 5th Fleet began a three-week unmanned and artificial intelligence integration event in Bahrain, Nov. 23, that will involve employing new platforms in the region for the first time.

The event, called Digital Horizon, will advance the command’s efforts to integrate new unmanned technologies while establishing the world’s first unmanned surface vessel fleet by end of next summer. U.S. 5th Fleet’s efforts are focused on improving what U.S. and regional navies are able to see above, on and below the water.

“I am excited about the direction we are headed,” said Vice Adm. Brad Cooper, commander of U.S. Naval Forces Central Command, U.S. 5th Fleet and Combined Maritime Forces. “By harnessing these new unmanned technologies and combining them with artificial intelligence, we will enhance regional maritime security and strengthen deterrence. This benefits everybody.”

Cooper established a staff called Task Force 59 in September 2021 to speed new tech integration across U.S. 5th Fleet. Since its launch, the task force has deployed a suite of new unmanned systems from operational hubs in Bahrain and Aqaba, Jordan.

Digital Horizon will include 17 industry partners bringing 15 different types of unmanned systems, 10 of which will operate with U.S. 5th Fleet for the first time.

The unmanned aerial vehicles will include two vertical take-off and landing systems, Aerovel’s Flexrotor and Shield AI’s V-BAT as well as Easy Aerial’s tethered UAV. The unmanned surface vessels will include the Elbit Systems Seagull, Exail DriX, L3Harris Arabian Fox MAST-13, Marine Advanced Robotics WAM-V, MARTAC T-38 Devil Ray, Ocean Aero TRITON, Open Ocean Robotics Data Xplorer, Saildrone Explorer, Seasats X3 and SeaTrac SP-48.  

Industry partners Accenture Federal Services and Big Bear AI will also employ data integration and artificial intelligence systems during the event, and Silvus Technologies will provide line-of-sight radio communications while an unmanned surface vessel from Ocius participates from off the coast of Western Australia. 

“The pace of innovation is amazing,” said Capt. Michael Brasseur, commander of Task Force 59. “We are challenging our industry partners in one of the most difficult operational environments, and they are responding with enhanced capability, fast. I am extremely proud of the entire team, including our many partners across government, academia, and industry for their commitment to Digital Horizon, as we discover new capability together.”

Over the past year, Task Force 59 operated USVs in regional waters for more than 25,000 hours, which equates to 12 years of nine-to-five testing five days a week. The Saildrone Explorer USV in particular has operated at sea for as long as 220 consecutive days without refueling or maintenance.

NAVCENT is headquartered in Manama, Bahrain and includes maritime forces operating in the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, Red Sea, parts of the Indian Ocean and three critical choke points at the Strait of Hormuz, Suez Canal and Bab al-Mandeb.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 479

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3818) to protect investors by

enhancing regulation of public auditors, improving corporate governance,

overhauling corporate disclosure made pursuant to the securities laws,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 10, 2002

Ms. CARSON of Indiana (for herself and Mr. LAFALCE) submitted the

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3818) to protect

investors by enhancing regulation of public auditors, improving corporate governance, overhauling corporate disclosure made pursuant to the securities laws, and for

other purposes.

1 Resolved, That immediately upon adoption of this res2 olution the Speaker shall, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

3 XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of

4 the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 3818) to protect investors by en6 hancing regulation of public auditors, improving corporate

7 governance, overhauling corporate disclosure made pursu-
2

HRES 479 IH

1 ant to the securities laws, and for other purposes. The

2 first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points

3 of order against consideration of the bill are waived. Gen4 eral debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not ex5 ceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair6 man and ranking minority member of the Committee on

7 Financial Services. After general debate the bill shall be

8 considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The

9 bill shall be considered as read. The Chairman of the Com10 mittee of the Whole shall accord priority in recognition

11 to Representative LaFalce of New York to offer an

12 amendment consisting of the text of H.R. 5070. At the

13 conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the

14 Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with

15 such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous

16 question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

17 amendments thereto to final passage without intervening

18 motion except one motion to recommit with or without in19 structions.

20 SEC. 2. If the Committee of the Whole rises and re21 ports that it has come to no resolution on the bill, then

22 on the next legislative day the House shall, immediately

23 after the third daily order of business under clause 1 of
3

HRES 479 IH

1 rule XIV, resolve into the Committee of the Whole for fur2 ther consideration of the bill.

Æ
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 21


                             CT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY



               NAME                                 STATE OF INCORPORATION
               ----                                 ----------------------

The Concord Telephone Company                               North Carolina
CTC Long Distance, Services, Inc.                           North Carolina
CT Cellular, Inc.                                           North Carolina
Carolina Personal Communications, Inc.                      North Carolina
CT Wireless Cable, Inc.                                     North Carolina
CTC Exchange Services, Inc.                                 North Carolina
CT Global Telecommunications, Inc.                                Delaware
CTC Internet, Inc.                                          North Carolina
CT Communications Northeast Trust                            Massachusetts
CT Communications Northeast, Inc.                            Massachusetts
CT Communications Northeast Wireless Trust                   Massachusetts
WaveTel, LLC                                                      Delaware
WebServe, Inc.                                              North Carolina
# UPDATE: Fire Extinguished on M/V Marlin Luanda Following Houthi Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile Attack

/ Published Jan. 27, 2024

Jan. 27, 2024Release Number 20240127-01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

TAMPA, Fla. – Yesterday, the Iranian-backed Houthis struck the Marshall Islands-flagged, Bermuda-owned M/V Marlin Luanda with an Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile (ASBM) in the Gulf of Aden. Marlin Luanda is transporting for commercial use a cargo of Naphtha, a highly flammable liquid hydrogen mixture. Following the missile strike, a major fire ensued in one of the cargo holds. USS Carney (DDG 64), the French Navy Frigate FS Alsace (D656) and Indian Navy Frigate INS Visakhapatnam (DD66) all responded quickly, providing critical firefighting material and assistance to the civilian crew, who had depleted their organic firefighting capability. The multinational crew, the lives of which the Houthis endangered, was made up of 22 Indian and 1 Bangladeshi crew members.

Thanks to this rapid response by the U.S., Indian and French navies, the fire is now extinguished. There were no casualties in the attack, the ship remains seaworthy, and has returned to its previous course.

Many thanks to our Combined Maritime Forces partners for their great teamwork at sea, averting a disaster that threatened lives and the seaworthiness of the ship and risked major environmental damage.

These unlawful actions have nothing to do with the conflict in Gaza. Neither the vessel nor its crew have any affiliation to Israel. The Houthis have fired indiscriminately into the Red Sea, targeting vessels impacting over 40 countries around the world.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of Comarco, Inc. I, Daniel R. Lutz, Chief Financial Officer of Comarco, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | This annual report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Comarco, Inc.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 30, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/    DANIEL R. LUTZ  
|                     |  |  |  | Daniel R. Lutz         
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
###### Editorial Note on Part 571

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 571 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 571.112 [Reserved]
Opinion issued November 24, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 15
- 00626
- CV

——————————— WILLIE H. ELLISON, B ARBARA J. VISER, AND ALL OCCUPANTS OF 3503 MOSLEY COURT, H OUSTON, TEXAS 77004 , Appellant s V. 2515 CAROLINE LTD . , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1063370

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant s , Willie H. Ellison, Barbara J. Viser and All Occupants of 3503 Mosley Court, Houston, Texas 77004 , ha ve neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 5, 20.1;2

see also T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 1 01.041 (West 2013), 101.0411 (West Supp. 2014); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and before the Judicial Panel on Multi

- district Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13

- 9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). Further, appellant s have not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant s did not adequately respond. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 5, 42.3( b), (c). We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of prosecution . We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Bland.
From: Jeffrey Licciardi [mailto:jeff.licciardi@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 10:54 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

Please make no changes the the current 401(k) program. The existing flexibility is 

perfect for me. I require no "guaranteed income" requirement as that will surely lower 

my total savings by increasing costs over the life of the account. 

Again, please do not create a guaranteed income requirement. Pension plans have been 

phased out for a reason. 

Jeff Licciardi 

Advertising 

Chicago IL
Cheshire,

Dec., 1894.

#### Gurnsey *& a., Ap’ts, v.*Keene.

The question of procedure upon an appeal from a decision of the mayor and aldermen in a highway proceeding is one of fact, to be determined at the trial term.

Appeal, from the decision of the mayor and aldermen awarding the plaintiffs no damages for land taken for a highway. The defendants in their answer aver that the plaintiffs’ land over which the new highway is laid is within the limits of an existing *244highway by prescription, and move that the issue on this averment be tried before sending the petition to the commissioners..

*Batchelder' Faulkner,*for the plaintiffs.

*John T. Abbott,*for the defendants.

Carpenter, J.

“If no sufficient objection is made, all petitions relating to highways shall be referred to the county commissioners.” P. S., e. 68, *s.*5. If, upon- a trial of the issue raised by the answer, it should be found that the new highway is laid over an old one, the finding would be a sufficient objection to sending the petition to the commissioners. The plaintiffs would be entitled to no damages *(Fierce*v. *Somersworth,*10 N. H. 369), and their petition would be dismissed. If it should be found that there was no existing highway where the new one is laid, the petition must be referred to the commissioners. On the return of their report the plaintiffs would be entitled to, and in order to-obtain their rights might be obliged to have, another trial. P. S., c. 68, *s.*10. They might thus be subjected to the expense and delay of two trials where one would suffice. What method of procedure in the trial of the several issues presented will be most convenient, expeditious, and least expensive to the parties, is á question of fact to be determined at the trial term. *Owen*v. ' *Weston,*63 N. H. 599.

*Case discharged.*

All concurred.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         August 31, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on August 22, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 33 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2023-241, CP2023-244.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-18795 Filed 8-30-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
----

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ William Pagano      |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |                    |   |
| Name:  | William Pagano          |   |
|   |                    |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |                    |   |
| Date:  | March 31, 2010          |   |

----
Exhibit 99.1

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of TNP Enterprises, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William J. Catacosinos, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company 

 

/s/ William J. Catacosinos 

 

William J. Catacosinos 

Chief Executive Officer 

March 28, 2003
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6883** 

KEITH BRYAN WEBB, a/k/a Keith Bryan Webb

- El , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. STEVEN FIGIEL, Acting Warden; UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION , Respondents

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Wheeling

. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 5:16

- cv
- 00044

- FPS

- RWT )

Submitted : August 25, 2016 Decided: August 30, 2016

Before NIEMEYER , DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Keith Bryan Webb , Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Erin Carter Tison, Assistant United States Attorneys, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpu blished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Keith Bryan Webb seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his expedited motion regarding the magistrate judge’s
paperless order denying Webb’s motion to strike

. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(20 12 ), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28

U.S.C. § 1292 (20 12 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

- 46 (1949). The order Webb seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately prese nted

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

DISMISSED
From: Broussard, Mark (MBroussard) [mailto:MBroussard@chevron.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 9:09 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Re: Include RIN 1210-AB33 in the subject line of the message.

No, the US Government should not, in any way shape or from, attempt to 

manage, take over or require; personal or corporate retirement accounts, 

retirement plans, 401K’s or IRAs to be managed by the Federal Government.

In the 234 year history of the Federal Government, the government has 

exhibited, without question, the inability to manage money. 

The USPS, AMTRAK, the Federal Budget, etc is only a few examples of fiscal 

mismanagement. 

 The American citizen’s retirement accounts are exactly what it implies: Personal 

retirement accounts, not Government slush funds. 

Will the public have the opportunity to vote on this ? Will illegals have the option 

to vote also? I hope not.... 

I think the Washington Congress needs to be tested for drugs ... I have worked 

for 30 years , never taken unemployment. I’m about to retire and your asking me 

to turn over all my savings to the Federal Government ( Corruption Mega Giants) 

to manage my 401 K and Stock Plan to you!!!! 

The one thing missing in all the Federal Bailouts, Stimulus Plans, Tarp Etc... I 

one million dollars of hand cuffs to escort the thieves to the pen... How about 

Rangel, Raines, Dodd and Franks .. Answer this Question Honestly !! Would 

you let Raines manage your Retirement Accounts ????
H. Res. 161

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 14, 2001.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1088) to amend the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to reduce fees collected by

the Securities and Exchange Commission, and for other purposes. The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. In

lieu of the amendment recommended by the Committee on

Financial Services now printed in the bill, the amendment in

the nature of a substitute printed in the Congressional

Record and numbered 1 pursuant to clause 8 of rule XVIII

shall be considered as adopted. The previous question shall

be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any

further amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, as

amended, equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial

Services; (2) the further amendment printed in the Congressional Record and numbered 2 pursuant to clause 8 of rule
2

•HRES 161 EH

XVIII, if offered by Representative LaFalce of New York or

his designee, which shall be in order without intervention of

any point of order, shall be considered as read, and shall be

separately debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 8, 2010 

s1005 

Order 

 

October 8, 2010 

141657 

JOHN ROY ALLEN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 141657 

 COA: 295753 

Mackinac CC: 2005-005986-TC 

ROBIN LYNN BELONGA, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 20, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.