alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-10721

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ATUL NANDA; JITEN JAY NANDA,

Defendants-Appellants

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:13-CR-65-1

USDC No. 3:13-CR-65-2

Before DAVIS, COSTA, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Atul Nanda and Jiten “Jay” Nanda (the Nandas) appeal the denial of 

their motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence under Federal 

Rule of Criminal Procedure 33. On direct appeal, we affirmed the Nandas’ 

convictions for crimes arising from a conspiracy to commit visa fraud. United 

States v. Nanda, 867 F.3d 522, 525 (5th Cir. 2017), cert. denied, 2018 WL 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 26, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-10721 Document: 00514529754 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/26/2018
No. 17-10721

2

1317816 (Apr. 16, 2018) (No. 17-8114). The new-trial motion was filed while 

the direct appeal was pending. 

We review the denial of a new-trial motion for abuse of discretion. 

United States v. Pratt, 807 F.3d 641, 645 (5th Cir. 2015). “Questions of law are 

reviewed de novo, but the district court’s findings of fact must be upheld unless 

they are clearly erroneous.” Id. (internal quotation marks and citation 

omitted). Rule 33 motions are not favored. Id.

The Nandas argue that the Government promised two testifying 

codefendants that they would not be immediately deported and that the 

promise was not revealed until sentencing, when the Government sought to 

modify a restitution award to preclude the codefendants’ convictions from 

qualifying as “aggravated felonies.” The Nandas also assert that the 

codefendants testified falsely, with the Government’s knowledge, that they had

not been promised a particular immigration result. 

The codefendants’ plea agreements stated that the Government could 

not promise a particular immigration result. Moreover, prior to trial, the 

Government accurately disclosed the intent of the agreements. Thus, the 

district court did not clearly err by concluding that there was no undisclosed 

promise. Further, the district court did not clearly err by finding that the 

codefendants did not testify falsely as to their understanding of their plea 

agreements, even if that understanding may have been incomplete in some 

respects. See Pratt, 807 F.3d at 645; see also United States v. Dunnigan, 507 

U.S. 87, 94 (1993); United States v. Simpson, 741 F.3d 539, 555 (5th Cir. 2014). 

Finally, even were we to assume there was undisclosed impeachment evidence 

or false testimony, there is no reasonable likelihood that it affected the verdict. 

See United States v. Stanford, 823 F.3d 814, 838-39 (5th Cir. 2016). 

The judgment is AFFIRMED. 

 Case: 17-10721 Document: 00514529754 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/26/2018
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.62


                                         October 7, 1999



The Honorable Lawrence S. Eagleburger
Baker, Donelson, Bearman & Caldwell
801 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Suite 800
Washington, D.C.  20004

                          ADVISORY SERVICES AGREEMENT

Dear Mr. Eagleburger:

     This agreement is made by COMSAT Corporation ("COMSAT") for the purpose of
retaining your advisory services to the Chairman of the Board and the President
and Chief Executive Officer of COMSAT.

     As a special advisor, you will be asked to meet with the Chairman and the
Chief Executive Officer at such times as mutually convenient, and from time to
time, to advise in such areas as:

    .  strategic planning
    .  corporate governance
    .  legislative matters
    .  other issues as identified by the Chairman of the Board or the President
       and Chief Executive Officer.

     The term of this agreement will commence on October 15, 1999 and remain in
effect through October 14, 2001 or the effective date of the merger between
COMSAT and Lockheed Martin Corporation, whichever is earlier.

       COMSAT agrees to pay you $25,000 per year for your advisory services
during the term of this agreement.  The annual advisory fee will be payable on
or about October 15 of each year during the term of the agreement, provided that
if the Lockheed Martin merger is consummated on or before October 15, 2000, this
agreement will terminate thereupon and the second annual payment will not be
made.  Expenses associated with the costs of business travel in connection with
services provided for the Chairman and/or the Chief Executive Officer will be
reimbursable.
<PAGE>

The Honorable Lawrence S. Eagleburger
October 7, 1999
Page 2


       Please indicate your concurrence with this agreement by signing below and
returning the signed agreement to me.

                                       Sincerely,

                                       /s/ Warren Y. Zeger

                                       Warren Y. Zeger



/s/ Lawrence S. Eagleburger                       10/12/99
---------------------------                       --------
Lawrence S. Eagleburger                           Date
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS






We  hereby  consent  to the incorporation  by  reference  in  the
Registration Statements of Alpharma Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form
S-8  (File No. 33-60495) and Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-57501,  333-
70229,  333-86037, 333-86153 and 333-39554) of our  report  dated
February  23, 2000, (except for Note 2B and paragraph 2  of  Note
23,  as  to which the date is November 10, 2000) relating to  the
financial statements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form
10-K/A.





PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Florham Park, New Jersey
November 10, 2000
-----------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of 1 

AUG 2 6 2010 

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 

PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS ...... BRANCH As of: August 26, 2010 

Received: August 10, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 26, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2da71 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, :WlO 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 


Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathe:ed 


Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 


Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0440 


Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 


Submitter Information 

Name: Dr. Vicky lease 

-------------------------------------------------------------,---­

General Comment 

See attached letter 

Attachments 

IRS-2010-0010-0440.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

https:/ Ifdrns.erulernaking.netlfdrns-web-agency IcornponentlsubrnitterInfoCoverPage?Cal1=... 8/26/2010 
August 10, 2010 

Office of Consumer Infonnation and Insurance Oversight 

Department ofHealth and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer and chiropractic physician I wish to take this opportunity to fOImally 

comment on the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID 

IRS-20 1 0-00 1 0-000 1). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part ofthe new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation ofthese 

regulations. 

Dr. Vicky Lease, DC, IHS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           7,164
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  120,828
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (3,600)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               129,204
<PP&E>                                          90,169
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (18,316)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 271,303
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          (53,224)
<BONDS>                                       (101,641)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          (119)
<OTHER-SE>                                    (114,223)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  (271,303)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              (264,557)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  255,783
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,144
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,728
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,363)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,852
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (511)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (297)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.02)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.02)<F2>
<FN>
<F1>The EPS-Primary tag represents basic EPS under SFAS No. 128.
<F2>The EPS-Diluted tag represents diluted EPS under SFAS No. 128.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

LORI E. TERRELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

MR. COOPER GROUP, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 20-0496 (CKK)

ORDER

(August 12, 2020)

For the reasons provided in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the Court DENIES

Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand, ECF No. 9, and GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF 

No. 5. The Court dismisses the Amended Complaint WITHOUT PREJUDICE and grants 

Plaintiff leave to amend her pleading, to the extent possible, in accordance with the accompanying 

Memorandum Opinion. Plaintiff shall file any amended pleading with this Court on or before 

SEPTEMBER 11, 2020. If Plaintiff does not file any amended pleading with the Court on or 

before SEPTEMBER 11, 2020, the Court will dismiss this action with prejudice. In response to 

Plaintiff’s amended pleading, if any, Defendant may re-file its current Motion to Dismiss, ECF 

No. 5, or request leave of the Court to file a new motion addressing any novel issues that arise. 

SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 12, 2020

 /s/

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY 

United States District Judge
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 175 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 55465]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-21938]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS

 Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled 
for 20 September 2012, at 9:00 a.m. in the Commission offices at the 
National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street 
NW., Washington, DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion may include 
buildings, parks, and memorials.
    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission 
are available on our Web site: www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding the 
agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be 
addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at 
the above address; by emailing staff@cfa.gov; or by calling 202-504-
2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the 
hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before 
the meeting date.

    Dated: August 30, 2012 in Washington, DC.
Thomas Luebke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-21938 Filed 9-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6331-01-M
```
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.31 MB)
 
 SME 1TSC RAO USCENTCOM USARCENT 184th SC Omani HET
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

88 FR 56607, August 18, 2023.

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:

9:00 a.m. EDT, Friday, August 25, 2023.

# CHANGES IN THE MEETING:

The meeting has been canceled.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Christopher Kirkpatrick, Secretary of the Commission, 202-418-5964.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: August 24, 2023.

Christopher Kirkpatrick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2023-18685 Filed 8-25-23; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
REG 1479 1-07) Page L of |

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION APR 2 U 2010

PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS
BRANCH

As of: April 20, 2010
Received: April 19, 2010
Status: Posted
PUBLIC SUBMISSION [rostes: sori 20, 2010,
‘Comments Due: May 03, 2010)
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0006
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants & Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Comment On: IRS-2010-0006-0001
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Document: IRS-2010-0006-0070
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-02028

Submitter Information

Name: Ron Peare
Address:
3854 Pioneer Road
Elida, OH, 45807

Submitter's Representative: Congressman Jim Jordan
—— — —<<<

General Comment

With the proven track record of the Federal Government's total ineptness in handleing social
Security funds and somebody has the audacity to ask me what I think about entrusting my IA to
to the federal government? Never, never, never! Even if the Federal Government had been good
stewards of Social Security, they have no business encroaching upon or "regulating" people's.
private financial affairs. Had I been irresponsible with my personal finances in the same manner
as Congress has been with U.S. taxpayers dollars, all that I would have to show for in older age is
deep debt ....... for my kids and grandkids to inherit! No, Uncle Sam, you are much too
irresponsible to to be handleing your own finacnes much less anybody elce's finances. Not even
China, Russia or India want to do business with the U.S. Why should I want to? I'll regulate my
own financial affairs - thank you very much! Ron Peare

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 4/20/2010
AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE
ALPHARMA INC. 2003 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN



The Alpharma Inc. 2003 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (the "Plan") is hereby amended effective as of June 22, 2006, as follows:



1.	Section 17.1 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

"The Company, acting through its Board, may, at any time and from time to time, alter, amend, modify, suspend, or terminate the Plan in whole or in part.  Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, without the prior approval of the Company''s stockholders, Options issued under the Plan will not be repriced, replaced, or regranted through cancellation, or by lowering the exercise price of a previously granted Option. No amendment of the Plan shall be made without stockholder approval if stockholder approval is required by law, regulation, or stock exchange rule.



Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board has delegated to the executive management Benefits Committee the authority to adopt administrative amendments to the Plan, provided, that such amendments do not involve a change in the costs or liability of the Company or alter the benefits payable thereunder.  The Board has delegated to the Compensation Committee the authority to adopt all other amendments to the Plan, provided, that such amendments do not significantly increase or decrease benefit amounts, or  are  required  to be adopted by the Board under the Code or the regulations thereunder.  The Board retains the authority to adopt amendments to the Plan that significantly increase or decrease benefit amounts, or are required to be adopted by the Board under the Code or regulations thereunder."



*********

|_/s/ George P. Rose________________ | October 23, 2006
|----------------------------------- | ----------------
|ALPHARMA INC.                       | DATE
Sent: Saturday, January 02, 2016 10:10 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Department of Labor: Public Comment for RIN-1210-AB30

Please support the proposed amendments to the disability ERISA laws: RIN-1210-AB30. 

I have been an ME/CFS patient for 16 years, and I know the physical and emotional agony 

of coping with severe disability. To have to struggle, in addition, with financial losses along 

with the indifference of those making decisions about long term disability insurance actually 

multiplies the tragedy.

The amendments will greatly assist the disabled in obtaining their deserved disability 

payments as promised by their LTD companies.

Sincerely yours,
Exhibit 11.1

                        ZMAX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

              CALCULATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE
                                  (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      Three Months                       Six Months
                                                                      Ended June 30,                    Ended June 30,
                                                              ----------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  1998             1997             1998             1997
                                                              -------------    -------------    -------------    -------------
                                                                        (unaudited)                       (unaudited)
<S>                                                           <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARE CALCULATIONS

BASIC WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:

Weighted average shares of common stock
  Outstanding                                                   11,729,714        9,252,228       11,729,714        8,062,809

Less: Weighted average number of escrowed
  shares of common stock outstanding                                     -       (2,800,000)      (1,400,000)      (2,800,000)

Less: Weighted average number of shares
  subject to cancellation                                         (479,801)        (626,987)        (479,801)        (626,987)
                                                              -------------    -------------    -------------    -------------

Basic weighted average shares outstanding                       11,249,913        5,825,241        9,849,913        4,635,822
                                                              =============    =============    =============    =============

DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:

Basic weighted average shares outstanding:                      11,249,913        5,825,241        9,849,913        4,635,822

  Treasury stock effect of options and warrants
    outstanding                                                    238,089                -                -                -
                                                              -------------    -------------    -------------    -------------

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding:                    11,488,002        5,825,241        9,849,913        4,635,822
                                                              =============    =============    =============    =============
</TABLE>
#### Michael Carr, Respondent, v. The Security Insurance Company, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by Barker, J. (See opinion in *Carr*v. *Providence Washington Insurance*Company, reported, *ante,*p 86.)