alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
First Amendment to Purchase Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.45 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT 
 This First Amendment to Purchase Agreement
(“Amendment”) is made by and between the Kirk & Blum Manufacturing Company (“Purchaser”) and Buckley Properties Co. (“Seller”) under the following circumstances: 
 A. Purchase and Seller are parties to that certain Purchase Agreement dated September 6, 2005 (“Purchase Agreement”) pursuant to which
Seller agreed to sell, and Purchaser agreed to purchase, certain real property more particularly described in the Purchase Agreement, all upon the terms and conditions contained therein; 
 B. Pursuant to Section 8(d) through (h) of the Purchase Agreement, Purchaser’s obligation to close the transaction contemplated by the
Purchase Agreement is subject to certain contingencies, none of which have occurred; and 
 C. Purchaser and Seller each desire to enter into
this Amendment to extend the period of time within which Purchaser may satisfy the contingencies contained in Section 8(d) through (h) of the Purchase Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth herein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, Purchase and Seller hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Purchaser waives the contingencies contained in Sections 8(a), (b), and
(c) of the Purchase Agreement, provided Seller cures Purchaser’s objections contained in Purchaser’s correspondence dated October 20, 2005 and October 21, 2005 to Purchaser’s sole satisfaction. 
 2. Section 4(a) of the Purchase Agreement is amended by deleting the date “November 15, 2005” and replacing it with the date
“November 30, 2005”, and any reference to “Closing” or “date of Closing” shall mean November 30, 2005. 
 3. The period of time in which Seller has to notify Purchaser of which matters it will cure and how of those previously objected to by Purchaser following the Inspection Period, as set forth in the subject Agreement, is hereby further
extended through November 30, 2005. 
 4. Except as amended, modified or altered hereby, the Purchase Agreement is not otherwise
amended, modified or altered, and each of the parties hereto ratifies, affirms and confirms each and every provision of the Purchase Agreement, as amended hereby. 







 Dated this 14th day of November, 2005. 
  

			
	PURCHASER:
	
	The Kirk & Blum Manufacturing Company
		
	By:	 	 /s/ L. John Bertoli, III

		 	L. John Bertoli, III, Vice President
	
	SELLER:
	
	Buckley Properties Co.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Thomas Strotman

		 	Tom Strotman, Treasurer
#### THE PEOPLE ex rel. MICHAEL H. SWIFT *v.*THE BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS.

*Trial hy boa/rd of police commissioners of New York*— *rule that where testimony lias been taken, before less than tb/ree commissioners, it must he laid before and examined hy the several commissioners*— *construction of it.*

Certiorari to review the proceedings and order of the board of police commissioners, on removing the relator from his office as sergeant of police.

The court at ’General Term said: “ This case really presents but a single question. The evidence that the relator was guilty of the charge was strong and clear. * * * The point referred to as the only one really in the case, is whether all four of the commissioners must be present on such a trial and examine the evidence, before judgment can be pronounced.

“ The rules of the board allow the testimony to be taken before one commissioner, but provide that where the testimony is taken *41before less than three commissioners it shall be laid before and examined by the several commissioners. The testimony was in part taken before one commissioner, it was laid before a meeting of the board, three commissioners being present. The examination was then continued, and at a further meeting the relator was again called up for further explanations. *We*think this proceeding was entirely regular. A meeting of three commissioners constitutes a legal board, with full power to act in such cases. The trial was had before such a board, and its judgment against the relator was unanimous. The language of the rule recognizes the power of three commissioners to hear and determine such cases. The words “ the several commissioners ” does not refer to the four commissioners, but to the several who constitute a board, with authority to try and determine the case. If four be present at the meeting where the testimony has been taken by one, or less than three, it must be laid before and examined by “ the several commissioners present.” And so if but three constitute the board the testimony must be laid before the several commissioners then sitting to try the case. The proceedings are judicial in their character and governed by rules usually applicable to judicial rather than administrative officers.

“There was no “reopening” of the proceedings in the sense urged by the relator’s counsel. All that was done was to continue the hearing and accord to the accused a fuller opportunity than usual to answer or explain the charge.

“We see no ground for interfering with the result.”

*John D. Quincy,*for the relator.

*Richard J. Morrison,*for the respondents.

Opinion by

Davis, P. J.;

Brady and Daniels, JJ., concurred.

Proceedings affirmed, with costs.
Editorial Note on Part 572
Editorial Notes: 1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 572.176 Knees and knee impact test procedure. ( a ) The knee assembly for the purpose of this test is the part of the leg assembly shown in drawing 420-5000 (incorporated by reference, see § 572.170).
( b ) When the knee assembly, consisting of lower upper leg assembly (420-5200), femur load transducer (SA572-S10, included in drawing 420-0000) or its structural replacement (420-5121), lower leg assembly (420-5300), ankle assembly (420-5400), and foot molded assembly (420-5500) (all incorporated by reference, see § 572.170) is tested according to the test procedure in subsection (c) of this section: ( 1 ) The peak resistance force as measured with the test probe-mounted accelerometer must not be less than 2.6 kN (585 lbf) and not more than 3.2 kN (719 lbf).
( 2 ) The force shall be calculated by the product of the impactor mass and its deceleration.
( c ) *Test Procedure.* The test procedure for the knee assembly is as follows: ( 1 ) Soak the knee assembly in a controlled environment at any temperature between 20.6 and 22.2 °C (69 and 72 °F) and a relative humidity between 10 and 70 percent for at least four hours prior to a test.
( 2 ) Mount the test material and secure it to a rigid test fixture as shown in Figure T6. No part of the foot or tibia may contact any exterior surface.
( 3 ) Align the test probe so that throughout its stroke and at contact with the knee it is within 2 degrees of horizontal and collinear with the longitudinal centerline of the femur.
( 4 ) Guide the pendulum so that there is no significant lateral, vertical, or rotational movement at the time of initial contact between the impactor and the knee.
( 5 ) The test probe velocity at the time of contact shall be 2.1 ±0.03 m/s (6.9 ±0.1 ft/s).
( 6 ) No suspension hardware, suspension cables, or any other attachments to the probe, including the velocity vane, shall make contact with the dummy during the test.
Submitted Via Email to e-ORI@dol.gov

February 4, 2011

Office of Regulations and Interpretations

Employee Benefits Security Administration

Attn: Fiduciary Definition Hearing

Room N-5655

U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20210

Re: Written request to be heard at Fiduciary Definition Hearing

Dear Sir or Madam:

The Worldwide Securities Services line of business of JPMorgan Chase Bank, 

N.A. respectfully requests the opportunity to testify at the Department of Labor’s 

(DOL) hearing to be held at the DOL on March 1, 2011. We have several 

concerns regarding the proposed rules published on October 22, 2010 and 

appreciate the opportunity to share our concerns with the DOL.

Our witness will be Lynn K. Shipman, Executive Director, Legal and Compliance, 

Worldwide Securities Services. Ms. Shipman will address in her testimony:

1. Reports or statements provided (including calculation of net asset 

values) that merely reflect the value of the plan’s or participant’s 

investments, should not be deemed fiduciary investment advice.

2. Objective analysis of investment managers’ performance utilizing 

benchmark, risk-return, peer-group and other data supplied by third 

party vendors should not be deemed investment advice.

3. Providing reports of an investment manager’s compliance with its 

investment guidelines should not be deemed investment advice.

4. The breadth and generality of the proposed rules will make it very 

difficult for service providers to determine, in advance, whether they 

are acting as a “fiduciary”, potentially leading them to reduce services 

available to plans.

Worldwide Securities Services appreciates your consideration of our request to 

testify. Should you have any questions, please contact Diane Gallagher at 816-

673-2140.
IV 

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 575

Honoring Erika Harold, Miss America 2003. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 8, 2002

Mr. JOHNSON of Illinois (for himself, Mr. KIRK, Mr. WELLER, Mr. SHIMKUS, 

Mrs. BIGGERT, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. CRANE, Mr. HYDE, Ms. 

SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. RUSH, Mr. JACKSON

of Illinois, Mr. PHELPS, Mr. COSTELLO, Mr. EVANS, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. 

BLAGOJEVICH, Mr. LIPINSKI, and Mr. HASTERT) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION

Honoring Erika Harold, Miss America 2003.

Whereas as a result of Erika Harold’s remarkable achievements and her resolve to empower youth against violence 

and degradation, she has been crowned Miss America 

2003; 

Whereas Miss Harold was named Phi Beta Kappa at the 

University of Illinois in Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, and 

was named University of Illinois Chancellor Scholar; 

Whereas Miss Harold was named as a finalist for the Truman Scholarship; 

Whereas Miss Harold was admitted into the Harvard School 

of Law; 
2

•HRES 575 IH 

Whereas Miss Harold has taken up the noble cause of ending 

youth violence; 

Whereas Miss Harold has been named national spokesperson 

for the Teen Victims Project of the National Center for 

Victims of Crime; 

Whereas Miss Harold has been named National Spokesperson 

for Fight Crime: Invest in Kids; 

Whereas Miss Harold has been named to the National Advisory for Peace Games; 

Whereas Miss Harold has been named to the National Board 

of Directors for the Center of Youth as Resources; 

Whereas Miss Harold has been named to the Advisory Council for the Empower Program; 

Whereas Miss Harold’s achievements and leadership bring an 

immense sense of pride to the Urbana, Illinois, community and the University of Illinois; and 

Whereas Miss Harold’s strong will and loving spirit drive her 

to accomplish her goal of ending youth violence: Now, 

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) congratulates Erika Harold on being 

3 crowned Miss America 2003; 

4 (2) honors her for her vision, determination, 

5 and integrity; and 

6 (3) recognizes her as a strong positive role 

7 model for youth in the United States.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         3423798
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          393000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               6200000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   17407901
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                       47535144
<ALLOWANCE>                                     518809
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                77133275
<DEPOSITS>                                    68411575
<SHORT-TERM>                                    606086
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1049047
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       5794323
<OTHER-SE>                                     1272244
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                77133275
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                4355304
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               830661
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                353512
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               5539477
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             2083455
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2109489
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          3429988
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  (40000)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                3036494
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1073052
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      633052
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    633052
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.45
<LOANS-NON>                                       6000
<LOANS-PAST>                                      3000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                403651
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     3769
<RECOVERIES>                                    158927
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               518809
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            376375
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         142434
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alfacell Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kuslima Shogen,
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                            /s/ Kuslima Shogen
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Name: Kuslima Shogen
                                            Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                                   Chairman of the Board
                                            Date: June 16, 2003
AGREEMENT ON THE SUCCESSION OF PENSION OBLIGATIONS



ALPHARMA INC, Company reg.no. 123 456 789, and Ingrid Wiik, Norwegian pers.no. 120245 49672, have today entered into the following agreement:



1. SUCCESSION OF RUNNING PENSION OBLIGATIONS

APHARMA INC. hereby transfers all pension obligations related to Ingrid Wiik as of January 1st 2007 to Vital Forsikring ASA, cf. offer of December 22 2006. With that, Vital Forsikring ASA assumes all administration and payment obligations to Ingrid Wiik from ALPHARMA INC. Ingrid Wiik consents to the succession.

2.TERMS OF PENSION SUCCESSION.

ALPHARMA INC. will immediately enter into a pension succession ("avløsningspensjon") agreement the ("Agreement") with Vital Forsikring ASA providing that yearly benefits will be paid in accordance with the agreed pension obligations in the agreement between ALPHARMA INC and Ingrid Wiik of 29 June 2006 and the original agreement of 26 October 2000, subject to the terms agreed to below.

The pension is to be discontinued at 78 years. Any excess of the insurance coverage paid to Vital Forsikring ASA is non-refundable and will remain as property of Vital Forsikring ASA

Ingrid Wiik has read the terms of the Agreement and finds the terms thereunder acceptable.



Upon the fulfillment of this agreement, all pension rights and obligations between the parties are concluded.

3.DISPUTES

Disputes relating to the understanding of this Agreement are to be settled amicably. In the event of failure to reach an amicable resolution, unresolved matters are to be determined by way of arbitration pursuant to the Norwegian arbitration act of May 14th 2004.

Fort Lee, NJ             December 28, 2006__

Place                      Date

|                             |                
|---------------------------- | ---------------
|__/s/ Jeffrey S. Campbell___ | /s/ Ingrid Wiik
|Alpharma Inc                 | Ingrid Wiik    
|                             |
#### § 1.200 Purpose of chapters I and II.

Chapters I and II of subtitle A provide OMB guidance to Federal agencies that helps ensure consistent and uniform government-wide policies and procedures for the management of the agencies' Federal financial assistance.
# March 24 USCENTCOM, Royal Jordanian Air Force Conduct Humanitarian Airdrops

/ Published March 24, 2024

March 24, 2024Release Number 20240324 - 01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla. –**U.S. Central Command and the Royal Jordanian Air Force conducted a combined humanitarian assistance airdrop into Northern Gaza on March 24, 2024, at 12:18 p.m. (Gaza time) to provide essential relief to civilians in Gaza affected by the ongoing conflict.

The combined joint operation included Jordanian provided food and a U.S. Air Force C-130 aircraft. A U.S. C-130 dropped 13,080 meal equivalents, including rice, flour, milk, pasta, and canned foods, providing life-saving humanitarian assistance in Northern Gaza.

The DoD humanitarian airdrops contribute to ongoing U.S. and partner-nation government efforts to alleviate human suffering. These airdrops are part of a sustained effort, and we continue to plan follow-on aerial deliveries.
#### Lucy Wainman, Respondent, v. Isaac Hampton, Appellant, Impleaded, etc.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Haight, J.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Burgess Cluff

Order of Surrogate’s Courtaffirmed on opinion of surrogate, without costs
# Virginia National Guard, Tajikistan conduct SPP exchange

/ Published April 5, 2023

**DUSHANBE, Tajikistan –** Virginia National Guard Soldiers shared infantry tactics and how to counter unmanned air systems with the Republic of Tajikistan March 7-11 in an information exchange as part of the Defense Department’s State Partnership Program. Virginia and Tajikistan have been partners under the program since 2003.

The infantry tactics exchange team, which included Soldiers assigned to the 1st Battalion, 183rd Regiment, Regional Training Institute, conducted the five-day event at a military installation in Dushanbe.

The team shared ideas, best practices and lessons learned with their Tajikistan partners. Master Sgt. Justin Owen, the noncommissioned officer in charge, said he was thrilled his NCOs got such a unique experience to train alongside foreign partners.

Sgt. 1st Class Matt Stemmler, an instructor with the 183rd RTI, shared his knowledge as an infantryman with 19 years of experience and four combat deployments. He said he looks forward to having more RTI instructors participate in foreign exchanges.

The countering unmanned air systems exchange focused on the employment of unmanned air systems, air space management and data collection. Virginia’s team included NCOs assigned to the 2nd Squadron, 183rd Cavalry Regiment, 116th Infantry Brigade Combat Team.

The team shared ideas, best practices and lessons learned with their Tajikistan partners. Sgt. 1st Class Joshua Lashley and Sgt. 1st Class Michael Brooks said they were thrilled to be part of this unique experience with a foreign nation.

“It was very enlightening working with the Tajiks, and both of us benefitted from a shared understanding of mission planning during all unmanned air systems operations,” Lashley said.

Both Lashley and Brooks came to Tajikistan with a combination of 15 years of experience planning, executing and flying unmanned air systems. They used their knowledge to present the basics of flying unmanned air systems and flight patterns to multiple agencies within the Tajik government.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>   THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATIO
           FROM THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND
           STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRE
           REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                  472,970
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                           490,182
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      9,647,859
<PP&E>                                  293,861
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        9,647,859
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 1,208,713
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                             21,875,447
<OTHER-SE>                          (13,436,301)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          9,647,859
<SALES>                                     105
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         50,847
<CGS>                                       775
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               775
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      3,579,933
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       21,614
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (3,529,861)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (3,529,861)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                         (3,529,861)
<EPS-BASIC>                            ($0.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            ($0.59)


</TABLE>
# U.S. General Mattis consults Pakistan leaders

/ Published June 7, 2011

Islamabad (June 7, 2011) – U.S. Central Command Commander Gen. James Mattis visited Pakistan to consult with Pakistan’s military leadership.

During his visit, Gen. Mattis met with Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, General Khalid Wynne, and other Pakistani military officials.  The purpose of his visit was to exchange views on regional security issues.

Gen. Mattis also met with the U.S. ambassador, Cameron Munter.

This is Gen Mattis’ fourth visit to Pakistan in his 10 months as CENTCOM commander.