alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Journal officiel C 164/23 j

| | ISSN 1725-2431 |
| --- | --- |
| Journal officiel
  de l'Union européenne | C 164 |
| | |
| Édition de langue française | Communications et informations | 47e année23 juin 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2431

Journal officiel

de l'Union européenne

C 164

Édition de langue française

Communications et informations

47e année23 juin 2004

---

| Numéro d'information | Sommaire | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Communications |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 164/1 | Taux de change de l'euro | 1 |

Numéro d'information

Sommaire

page

I   Communications

Commission

2004/C 164/1

Taux de change de l'euro

1

| FR | |
| --- | --- |

FR

---

I Communications

Commission

| 23.6.2004 | FR | Journal officiel de l'Union européenne | C 164/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2004

FR

Journal officiel de l'Union européenne

C 164/1

---

Taux de change de l'euro (1)

22 juin 2004

(2004/C 164/01)

1 euro=

| | Monnaie | Taux de change |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | dollar des États-Unis | 1,2091 |
| JPY | yen japonais | 131,17 |
| DKK | couronne danoise | 7,4334 |
| GBP | livre sterling | 0,664 |
| SEK | couronne suédoise | 9,162 |
| CHF | franc suisse | 1,5133 |
| ISK | couronne islandaise | 87,91 |
| NOK | couronne norvégienne | 8,324 |
| BGN | lev bulgare | 1,9559 |
| CYP | livre chypriote | 0,5817 |
| CZK | couronne tchèque | 31,935 |
| EEK | couronne estonienne | 15,6466 |
| HUF | forint hongrois | 255,35 |
| LTL | litas lituanien | 3,4527 |
| LVL | lats letton | 0,6541 |
| MTL | lire maltaise | 0,4252 |
| PLN | zloty polonais | 4,5838 |
| ROL | leu roumain | 40 614 |
| SIT | tolar slovène | 239,5 |
| SKK | couronne slovaque | 39,97 |
| TRL | lire turque | 1 796 300 |
| AUD | dollar australien | 1,7608 |
| CAD | dollar canadien | 1,6462 |
| HKD | dollar de Hong Kong | 9,4305 |
| NZD | dollar néo-zélandais | 1,9314 |
| SGD | dollar de Singapour | 2,0777 |
| KRW | won sud-coréen | 1 400,56 |
| ZAR | rand sud-africain | 7,6237 |

Monnaie

Taux de change

USD

dollar des États-Unis

1,2091

JPY

yen japonais

131,17

DKK

couronne danoise

7,4334

GBP

livre sterling

0,664

SEK

couronne suédoise

9,162

CHF

franc suisse

1,5133

ISK

couronne islandaise

87,91

NOK

couronne norvégienne

8,324

BGN

lev bulgare

1,9559

CYP

livre chypriote

0,5817

CZK

couronne tchèque

31,935

EEK

couronne estonienne

15,6466

HUF

forint hongrois

255,35

LTL

litas lituanien

3,4527

LVL

lats letton

0,6541

MTL

lire maltaise

0,4252

PLN

zloty polonais

4,5838

ROL

leu roumain

40 614

SIT

tolar slovène

239,5

SKK

couronne slovaque

39,97

TRL

lire turque

1 796 300

AUD

dollar australien

1,7608

CAD

dollar canadien

1,6462

HKD

dollar de Hong Kong

9,4305

NZD

dollar néo-zélandais

1,9314

SGD

dollar de Singapour

2,0777

KRW

won sud-coréen

1 400,56

ZAR

rand sud-africain

7,6237

---

(1)

Source: taux de change de référence publié par la Banque centrale européenne.

---
i \ ' l.. ' ' . 3 \ 

.'\.b-J 2 I 1 s± - )u.J ~ c~ 

C]J ~C<'Y\1 Nc:'J b; -~~A 

-~ b 

9 ~-~-h 176\•,d .-~ 

tv .. 

'f' I s J ,;;I 'i q - {\ _----"il{;d'-ts. ~· ~-rf'cC:L-. --\'" .. ~tff'ffl:ch-'1~ ... ]... Lf S 

GcJ"'l · ·':" I}Aa(k be~ .. ~7 

Wn.2JL,+ ~ [ Speu."1 t.~\-0•· 2: ~ ]~ ~ .. ~.·~··· . 

),qol ~ ( \1 - 4 
. . .
§ 601.45 Required information. A petition for relief under this section shall: ( a ) Identify the grantee or subgrantee and its geographic location;
( b ) Specifically address how an FTA requirement in a policy statement, circular, or agency guidance will limit a grantee's or subgrantee's ability to respond to an emergency or disaster;
( c ) Identify the policy statement, circular, guidance document and/or rule from which the grantee or subgrantee seeks relief; and
( d ) Specify if the petition for relief is one-time or ongoing, and if ongoing identify the time period for which the relief is requested. The time period may not exceed three months; however, additional time may be requested through a second petition for relief.
#### § 604.5 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to identify the limited exceptions under which recipients may provide community-based charter services.
EG 1YPLFI-09 Page 1 of 1
LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION FE§
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS 22 2010

BRANCH

As of: February 22, 2010
Received: February 21, 2010
Status: Posted
PUBLIC SUBMISSION [restes: reoruary 22, 2010
‘Comments Due: May 03, 2010)
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0006
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants & Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Comment On: IRS-2010-0006-0001
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Document: IRS-2010-0006-0040
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-02028

Submitter Information

Name: Laurence Neve
Address:
Alexandria, VA,

General Comment

If the Agencies are truly concerned over the lack of a "stream of income" for retirees due to the
shift from past defined benefit plans to the new defined contribution model, they should seek to
understand what changes in the Tax Code and accounting standards & rules made such changes
attractive for businesses, corporations, and even the Federal Government itself.

But even if it were possible to roll back the clock, many people would be hesitant to have their
investment taken away and replaced by "stream of income" that stops upon their death, The
annuity insurance model is only attractive to those who live into far old age, and have no
intention of leaving investment for their heirs. In fact, the annuity model depends on the vast
majority of participants *not* living in to advanced old age in order to have sufficient funding for
those who do, Such an annuity would leave nothing for the family of a participant who was cut
down by accident or disease prior to old age, unlike the investment of a defined contribution plan.

2/22/2010

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         443,860
<SECURITIES>                                   810,863
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,254,723
<PP&E>                                           3,123
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,599
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,257,212
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          215,712
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,477
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,022,023
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,257,212
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               194,121
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                457,917
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            457,917
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                781,775
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,239,692
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 289 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     November 16, 2001.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill 
(H.R. 3009) to extend the Andean Trade Preference Act, to grant additional trade 
benefits under that Act, and for other purposes. The bill shall be considered as 
read for amendment. The amendment recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means 
now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, as amended, 
equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Hillsborough,

June, 1900.

#### Colby *v.*Campbell.

Replevin, for certain articles of personal property. Trial by tbe court. December 17, 1897, when tbe defendant and his son were boarding with the plaintiff, the defendant conveyed to her a pair of horses as security for all money he was then owing or might at any time thereafter owe her. The property replevied subsequently came into tbe plaintiff’s possession, and she claimed to hold it by virtue of a lien, under the provisions of section 1, chapter 141, of the Public Statutes, for the board of the defendant and his son. There was due her on the date of the writ $90 on this account, but the horses conveyed to her as security for the board were of sufficient value to payT that claim. The court found a verdict for the defendant, and the plaintiff excepted.

*Osgood & Osgood,*for the plaintiff.

*David W. Perkins,*for the defendant.

Wallace, J.

If the taking of security was intended as a waiver of the lien, the verdict must stand. Whether the acts of the parties and the other evidence established a waiver was a question of fact to be decided at the trial term *(Pickett*v. *Bullock,*52 N. H. *354; Fuller*v. *Brown,*67 N. H. 188; *Estes*v. *Insurance Co.,*67 N. H. 462), and the case presents no question of law.

*Exception overruled.*

Y oung, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
Editorial Note on Part 453
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 453 appear at 74 FR 49241, Sept. 25, 2009.

§ 453.5 Termination of detention orders and other orders. ( a ) When a container, which is the subject of a detention order or other order, is restored to a safe condition or otherwise brought into compliance, it must be examined in accordance with § 452.3 and a new re-examination date marked on the container in accordance with § 452.1(b) of this subchapter.
( b ) The owner or the owner's agent shall notify the District Commander or Captain of the Port who issue the order, in writing, that the container has been brought into compliance. Upon giving such notice, the owner, or his agent, may return the container to service.
[45 FR 37217, June 2, 1980]
----

(2004/C 88 E/0316)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3917/02

by Juan Naranjo Escobar (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(14 January 2003)

Subject:   Border regions

In its communication ‘Community Action for Border Regions’ (1), the Commission proposed allocating appropriations totalling EUR 195 million over the period 2002-2006 for additional measures in regions bordering with candidate countries.

These measures, which affect 23 regions of five Member States, would be managed through the TEN, Interreg and Youth programmes and the pilot project for SMEs under budget heading B5-3003.

Can the Commission provide a breakdown by heading of the total sum of appropriations allocated to the border regions under the 2002 and 2003 budgets, including additional funds approved by the budgetary authority?

Can the Commission provide a breakdown of the payments allocated in 2002 and 2003 to each of the regions concerned?

What were the total payments made to each of these regions in 2002?

Answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(27 February 2003)

The total amount of the additional commitment appropriations for the Union regions bordering the acceding countries in the budgets 2002 and 2003 is some EUR 98 million. The amount is split up as follows.

As regards the 2002 budget:

As regards the 2003 budget:

No additional commitments in favour of Union regions bordering the acceding countries have been made in the framework of the trans-European networks since the corresponding legislative proposal adopted by the Commission on 2 October 2001, i.e. the draft regulation amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2236/95 laying down general rules for the granting of Community financial aid in the field of trans-European networks (2), has not yet been adopted.

The Commission is not in a position to deliver an overview of the exact financial allocation to each border region in 2002 and 2003. Especially where the Interreg programmes are concerned, the geographical pattern of expenditures is a result of the location of the projects supported, the projects themselves being selected on quality criteria.

The process of committing the additional financial resources for regions bordering the acceding countries in 2002 has been completed. Project implementation is, however, still in its early stage. Payment data are therefore not meaningful at present.

Concerning the above mentioned Interreg A and Β programmes, most of the adjusted programme complements were sent to the Commission by the end of 2002. Spending on projects can thus start in early 2003. It will be the task of the respective steering committees to commit these financial means to concrete projects according to criteria of the programme complements. Future payments will therefore depend on spending on the ground. The closing date for the eligibility of expenditure for this funding is 31 December 2004.

----

(1)  COM(2001)437.

(2)OJ C 75 E, 26.3.2002.

----
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.01 MB)
 
 U.S. Navy; U.S. Air Force; CENTCOM; AFCENT; USS Abraham Lincoln; B-52H Stratofortress; F-18 Hornet;
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### JENNIE MANCHEST, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LONG ISLAND FINANCE CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Submitted January 27, 1933

Decided August 16, 1933.

Before Justices Bodine and Donges.

For the defendant-appellant, *Nathaniel A. Jacoby (Emil Stremlau).*

For the plaintiff-respondent, *Leo 8. Lowenlcopf.*

Per Curiam.

This was an action in replevin. The jury returned a verdict of $700 in favor of the plaintiff. Plaintiff’s title was predicated upon a purchase at a foreclosure sale. The car was sold to the plaintiff’s husband under a conditional bill of sale. The chattel mortgage under which she purchased was subsequent thereto. The conditional sales agreement was recorded on April 19th, 1928, at eleven-twenty a. m., and the chattel mortgage went on at two twenty-five p. m. the same day. The car was sold March 31st, 1928, so that the recordation occurred nineteen days after the sale.

Section 5 of the Uniform Conditional Sales act is as follows: “Every provision in a conditional sale reserving property in the seller, shall be void as to any purchaser from or creditor of the buyer, who, without notice of such provision, purchases the goods or acquires by attachment or levy a lien upon them, before the contract or a copy thereof *719shall be filed as hereinafter provided, unless such contract or copy is so filed within ten days after the making of the conditional sale.” 2 *Cum. Supp. Comp. Stat., p.*3130.

The trial court took the view that this section voided the conditional sales agreement as against a purchaser under the chattel mortgage. Not so. The chattel mortgagee neither purchased the car nor acquired by attachment or levy a lien lien thereon before the conditional sales agreement went on record. The conditional sales agreement was, therefore, not void as against the chattel mortgagee, and a purchaser at a foreclosure sale under that mortgage could acquire no greater rights than the chattel mortgagee had. The prior filing of the conditional sales agreement was notice. *Morey & Co.*v. *Schaad et al.,*98 *N. J. L.*799; 121 *Atl. Rep.*622.

The proceeding in the United States District Court, in which it was found that the making of the chattel mortgage upon a conditionally sold car was a fraud which would bar a discharge, was not an adjudication which would debar the defendant from asserting its right to the car in suit under its duly recorded conditional sales agreement. The issues were obviously different.

The judgment is reversed.
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

**Supplement to Registrant’s Registration Statements on Form S-8**

 

In accordance with the requirements of Form S-8, the registrant herebysupplements any discussion of the indemnification provisions of the registrant in all of the registrant’s registration statements previously filed on Form S-8 with the following undertaking: 

 

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Actof 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission suchindemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by adirector, officer, or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrantwill, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and willbe governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
**Exhibit 10.32**

 

**2011 Base Salaries for Named Executive Officers**

 
| **Name and Title**                                       | ** ** | **Salary** | ** ** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------|------------|
| James M. Gower                                                     |       |       |       |
| Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and   Director      |       | $          | 648,900    |   |
| Donald G. Payan, M.D.                                              |       |       |       |
| Executive Vice President and President of Discovery   and Research |       | $          | 522,365    |   |
| Raul R. Rodriguez                                                  |       |       |       |
| President and Chief Operating Officer                              |       | $          | 515,037    |   |
| Elliott B. Grossbard, M.D.                                         |       |       |       |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Medical Officer                 |       | $          | 486,675    |   |
| Ryan D. Maynard                                                    |       |       |       |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial   Officer             |       | $          | 412,000    |   |

 

----
Register—,20)1 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION The lead in language
of 18 AAC 50.030

is amended

toread: 18 AAC 50.030. State Air Quality Plan. Volumes

II and III of the Slate Air Quality Control Plan for implementing

and enforcing
the provisions

of AS 46.14 and this chapter,

as .7Zz/y/4 Zo/ 1at01’.., amended through (adupGo’i daftof tlzcpc ,egululiunaf[FEBRUARY 11,2011],
are adopted
by reference. The plan includes the following documents which arealso adopted
by reference: •

.S 0 18 AAC 50.030(7)

is repealed: (7) repealed //.5f. 1/18/97, Register 141; am6/21/98, Register 146; am 9/4/98, Register 147; am1/1/2000, Register 152; am 12/30/2000, Register 156; am 9/21/2001, Register 159; am1/27/2002, Register 161; am 3/27/2002, Register 161; am 5/3/2002, Register 162; am 2/20/2004, Register 169; am 6/24/2004, Register 170; am10/1/2004, Register 171; am 12/14/2006, Register 180; am 12/30/2007, Register 184; am 5/17/2008, Register 186; am 7/25/2008, Register 187; am 11/9/2008, Register 188; am 5/6/2009, Register 190; am 11/4/2009, Register 192; am4/1/2010, Register 193; am 10/29/2010, Register 196; am4/13/2011, Register 198; am_/_/, Authority:

AS 46.03.020

AS 46.14.030

Sec. 30, ch. 74, SLA 1993 AS 46.14.020

AS 46.14.140