alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Amar Raval [mailto:araval@bergplummer.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 12:49 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: In Re: RIN 1210-AB39 

Dear Department of Labor,

I am writing regarding the supposed need to delay regulations that were set to be

implemented by the DOL. As an ERISA practitioner who represents individuals against 

insurance companies, there is an urgent need to implement the regulations without 

further delay. The DOL already addressed all concerns regarding the supposed need for 

the delay. Insurance companies and plans had plenty of time to make their case. The 

rule making process closed. Why should we give them yet more deference?

Second, the DOL evaluated the purported cost increases now raised by plans and 

insurance companies and concluded that the costs would be minimal. Those are 

research based conclusions, not “the sky is falling” fears that insurance companies 

seemingly always raise to justify their nefarious ends. 

Third, after careful consideration listening to insurance companies, plans, and 

claimants, the DOL implemented well-thought out regulations. Why delay 

implementing them now? The process worked. The system worked. Why not finalize 

things?

Yet Still I Remain,

Amar Raval

Berg Plummer Johnson & Raval, LLP

4203 Montrose Boulevard, Suite 260

Houston, Texas 77006

713-526-0200

832-615-2665 (fax)

Licensed in Texas ♦ California

Member of the Texas Bar College

This message and all attachments are confidential and may be protected by the attorney-client or other 

privileges. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you believe this 

message has been sent to you in error, please notify the sender by replying to this transmission and 

delete the message without disclosing it. Thank you. Pursuant to U.S. Treasury Department Regulations, 

we are required to advise you that, unless otherwise expressly indicated, any federal tax advice 

contained in this communication, including attachments and enclosures, is not intended or written to be 

used, and may not be used, for the purposes of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal 

Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matter 

addressed herein.
0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

Air Heater Inlet Temperature (°F)

Load (MWg)

Coronado Unit 2 PI Data

January 1, 2011 - July 31, 2012

Unit load ≈ 270 MWg 

for the majority of data 

points to be equal to or 

above 599°F
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.43 MB)
 
 Task Group (CTG) 56.1 Eager Response 18 EagerResponse Explosive Ordnance Disposal Mobile Unit (EODMU) 1 Kuwaiti Army Explosive Ordnance Disposal TG 56.1 explosive ordnance disposal Commander EOD
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**McDATA Corporation**

 

CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 ofTitle 18, United States Code)

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of McDATACorporation, a Delaware corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

TheCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 31,2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:             April 15,  2004 | /s/ Ernest J. Sampias                                         |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                | Ernest J. Sampias                                             |
|                                                                                                | Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
----------------------------------

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-52378, No. 333-59251 and No. 2-64572) of
Coachmen Industries, Inc. of our report dated February 2, 2001, except for the
information in Note 5, for which the date is February 9, 2001, and Note 11, for
which the date is February 12, 2001, relating to the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule at December 31, 2000 and for each of
the two years in the period ended December 31, 2000, which appears in this Form
10-K.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
March 25, 2002
Coös,

Dec., 1900.

#### Sartwell *& a. v.*Mack.

Assumpsit, to recover $155.38 for goods sold and delivered. Facts found by a referee. The defendant sought to recoup damages resulting from the inferior quality of goods sold to him by the plaintiffs at an earlier date. The damages were assessed at •$119.80. Subject to the plaintiffs’ exception, the court allowed the defendant to amend by pleading set-off, and ordered judgment for the plaintiffs for $35,53.

*Jason U.*Dudley, for the plaintiffs.

*Thomas E.*Johnson, for the defendant.

Pike, J.

It does not appear that the plaintiffs objected at the time to the trial of the defendant’s cause, -arising out of the former sale. Nor is there any suggestion that the trial was not fair, or that the plaintiffs- have been prejudiced by the course pursued. It is now too late for the plaintiffs to object.

*Exception overruled.*

Peaslee, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
|     |                                                                                                                       |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|     |                                                                                                                                                      |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
| Dated: | January 3, 2012 | By: | /s/ Roger G. Little |   |
|   |   |   | Roger G. Little |   |
|   |   |   | Chairman of the BoardChief Executive Office and President |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |
# EDSEL A DIXON (Pro Se Litigant) 732 Weddle Dr. Grapevine, Texas 76051 682-301-0592

Rains County District Clerk 

### Rains County Courthouse 220 West Quitman Street P. O. Box 187 Emory, Texas 75440 

## CATHY a. LUSK. CLERK RE: Cause No. 9544 In the Matter of the Marriage ofEdselAmos Dixon andHeather D. Dixon and In the Interest of Ashley Lynn Dixon, A Child 

### In the 354th Judicial District Court i Twelfth Court of Appeals Cause No. March 

# 3*. 2015

## FILED mCOURTOFAPPEALS I 12th Court ofApp<„n, m.Wrf

m, a i ntia

Dear Clerk or Deputy: 

### Enclosed is the original file stamped Notice ofAppeal for filing in connection with the above matter. 

### Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Encs. as stated Cc: H. Craig Black, Attorney for Heather D Dixon 2510 Lee Street Greenville, Texas 75401 Clerk ofthe Court (w/ enclosures) Twelfth Court ofAppeals 1517 West Front Street, Suite 354 Tyler, Texas 75702 Yours very.truly,

EDSEL A DIXON ( Pro Se Litigant)IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF HEATHER DENICE DLXON AND EDSEL AMOS DLXON IN THE INTEREST OF ASHLEY LYNN DLXON, MINOR CHILD CASE 9544

§ § § § § § IN THE DISTRICT COURT

OF RAINS COUNTY, TEXAS

354TM JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

## This Notice of Appeal is filed by Edsel Amos Dixon, Petitioner, aparty to this proceeding who seeks to alter the trial court'sjudgmentor other appealable order. 

### 1. Thetrial court, cause number, andstyle of this case areas shown inthe caption above. 

### 2. Thejudgment ororder appealed from was signed onJanuary 23, 2015. 3. EdselAmos Dixondesiresto appeal from all portionsof thefadEmentr—-——-—_. rnLc J (M COURT OF APPEALS I 

# 4. This appeal is being takento theTwelfthCourtofAppeals. J L9»rtofAapeateDistrict 5. This notice is being filed by Edsel Amos Dixon.

9544; Dixon 

### Notice ofAppeal 

## „ TYLER VEXAS 

## CATHY S. LUSK, CL RespectfiflTy submitted;

Edsel Amos Dixon 732 Weddle Dr. 

### Grapevine, TX 76051

- Ti tn f— 2= m a -n o" • ro • D do: : en 33 ---!__, 

# 1 3P| 13 —1' -o rn o rn r. -m X. CO o
en o <3 

### Page 1 of2Certificate ofService 

## I certify that atrue copy of this Notice of Appeal was served inaccordance with rule 9.5 of the Texas Rules ofAppellate Procedure oneach party orthat party's lead counsel as follows:

Party: Heather D. Dixon Lead Attorney: Craig Black Address of service: 2510 Lee Street, Greenville, Texas 75402 

### Method ofservice: By Certified Mail
Date of Service:;

9544; Dixon 

### Notice ofAppeal ,2015

Edsel A. Dixon



### Page 2 of2
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2011-1067 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-NM-034-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LAIRD LEASK BASEHOAR,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 173 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
# One small shop, Two major missions: 109th MDVS

/ Published Jan. 24, 2023
ALI AL SALEM AIR BASE, Kuwait, 
Tucked away in a tiny building, members of the 109th Medical Detachment Veterinary Services work around the clock to care for all members at Ali Al Salem Air Base.The small team of professionals support two major missions that protect the base population.**Mission 1: Caring for Military Working Dogs**At AASAB, veterinary services provides health certifications and exams for all Military Working Dogs coming in and out of the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility. They ensure the MWDs are healthy so they can fly and do their missions.“It’s important because of the capabilities of these dogs,” said U.S. Air Force Tech. Sgt. Dennis Subject, a 386th Expeditionary Security Forces Squadron U.S. Central Command MWD liaison. “We have drug dogs and bomb dogs, and they are going down range, and they are typically out in the front clearing the area before our troops go in.”U.S. Army Capt. Leilani Im, a 109th MDVS veterinarian, remembered doing 22 health certificates last month alone for dogs coming in and out of theater.Im and her team are also available 24/7 to care for the MWDs stationed here.“That is probably one of my favorite parts, just being able to keep those guys in the fight and doing the mission,” said Im. “We get to be behind the scenes helping them do what they have to do.”**Mission 2: The FARM Program**Rabies is endemic here and deadly. Veterinary Services works closely with pest management and public health to limit the number of stray animals on base.“We play a big role in the Feral Animal Risk Mitigation program,” said Im. “Once the animals are trapped through pest management, we then determine as a team if they are an adoptable candidate. We are very privileged to be on an installation that has a really close relationship with a local animal shelter, so our goal is to give them a live exit off the base.”Im stressed the importance of leaving the animals seen on base alone. She stated that feeding them or touching them could actually cause more harm than good. The animals were born in this environment and know how to survive on their own, so they should not become dependent on people who will not always be there to take care of them.If you are interested in caring for the animals, you can do it in a safe way by joining the vet services volunteer group.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/21/15 

Received: July 21, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8k3t-genk

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2595

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Brad Palmer

Address: 

The Conestoga Group

601 Swedesford Road

Frazer, PA, 19355

Email: brad.palmer@conestoga.biz

Phone: 6108541420

General Comment

My business provides fee-based investment advisory services to small 401k plans and to 

individuals who have as much as $6,000,000 in assets and as little as a start-up investor. We have 

solutions for everyone that provide a good plan with quality options, regardless of size.

In my opinion there needs to be a fiduciary standard that replaces the current buyer beware 

principle of a disclosure based system. We see far too many buyers in our client base who have 

purchased or received proposals to purchase annuities that generate high commissions to the 

agents and poor results to the client. The marketing materials are highly deceptive in my opinion. 

One we recently analyzed for a client offered 8% interest guaranteed for 10 years and a 5.5% 

payout. What it didnt overtly disclose was that the 8% was simple interest and the payout did not 

return principal. The true internal rate of return was under 2% and the client chose not to do it. 

Another situation promised the first 18% of S & P upside and none of the first 10% of S & P 

losses annually. Upon closer inspection, the S & P index used was the P (price) index instead of 
the T (total return) index, where the P index has historically been over 20% lower, and the 

annual results were calculated monthly using the full loss exposure but capped the upside each 

month to generate the annual result, where the loss protection was then applied. Again, the client 

rejected the proposal once they understood. These are examples of what a good fiduciary 

standard would help customers avoid.

I am not convinced the current proposed conflict of interest regulations will accomplish the 

objective of avoiding this kind of misguided product sales. There are very affluent sales people 

on TV now who can afford to modify their techniques and keep pushing these products. Perhaps 

it would be better to restrict the financial product manufacturers in how they can present the 

merits of their products. In the mortgage industry, the APR was designed to accurately reflect the 

real mortgage rate after the interest rate and points are all factored into an objective calculation. 

Perhaps a similar standard would promote more fully disclosed financial products to the 

retirement investor.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12156]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Africa & Byzantium” at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York; the Cleveland Museum of Art, Cleveland, Ohio; and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Nicole L. Elkon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2023-18403 Filed 8-25-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P