alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Garry L. Anselmo, Chief Executive Officer of Silverado Gold
  Mines Ltd. (the "registrant"), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the registrant;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
  any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
  to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
  statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
  quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
  financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
  material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
  of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
  for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
  in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls
  and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
  those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
  is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
  registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days
  prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report
  our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
  based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
  based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
  committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
  function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the
  design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
  ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified
  for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
  and

b) any fraud, whether or not material,
  that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
  registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated
  in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
  controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
  subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
  actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 15, 2007

|By: /s/ Garry L. Anselmo
|------------------------
|Garry L. Anselmo,       
|Chief Executive Officer 



---
#### EUGENE BROWN, PROSECUTOR, v. ABRAHAM SCHWARTZ, RESPONDENT.

Submitted October term, 1932

Decided March 6, 1933.

Before Justices Parker, Lloyd and Heher.

For the prosecutor, *Cox & Walhurg (Arthur F. Mead,*of counsel).

For the respondent, *Henry Hershoff*and *Herman B. J. Weckstein.*

*197Per Curiam.

The writ of *certiorari*was allowed in this case to review an order made by the judge of the District Court of the Second Judicial District of Essex county made on May 20th, 1932, transferring a cause pending therein to the Circuit Court of that county, and directing that the order should be entered *nunc pro tunc*as of July 30th, 1927.

A summons was issued in the cause in the District Court on June 10th, 1927. On July 23d, 1927, on motion of counsel for the defendant, an order was made by a judge of the Circuit Court of Essex county directing the transfer of the record of the case and all papers filed therein to that court. A counter-claim demanding $1,000 damages was filed by the defendant in the Circuit Court. Several notices of trial of the case in the Circuit Court were given but the case hung fire and was not tried. Thereafter plaintiff’s counsel gave notice in the Circuit Court of a motion to dismiss the counterclaim on the ground, among others, that the Circuit Court had no jurisdiction to entertain it and that the suit had been illegally removed to the Circuit Court, a week later giving notice of an additional motion to set aside the order of July 23d, 1927, transferring the cause from the District Court to the Essex Circuit Court. In the meantime on May 14th, 1932, the counter-claim was filed in the District Court as though the action were still pending in that court and on May 20th, following, the order complained of was made

We have been pointed to no authority and can find none to justify the order of the Circuit Court judge. The attempted transfer of July 23d, 1927, was without legal authority and void. This order being of no effect, the cause was still pending in the District Court when the counter-claim of May 14th, 1932, was filed.

As the law stood when the action was instituted in the District Court, section 1, chapter 120 of the laws of 1925 (page 341), provided that upon the filing of a counter-claim exceeding the jurisdiction of the District Court the cause could be transferred by the District Court judge into the Circuit Court. In 1928, however, this section was amended *198by chapter *152*(page 308), and the counter-claim justifying such transfer, was limited to liquidated damages. It was so held by Judge Mackay in *Tigler*v. *Fabrics Finishing Corp.,*8 *N. J. Mis. R.*303; 150 *Atl. Rep.*228, and by Judge Eldredge in *Toone*v. *Skorupski,*9 *N. J. Mis. R.*381; 154 *Atl. Rep.*621, and we agree with their construction of the act. The counter-claim in the present case is undoubtedly for unliquidated damages and could not be properly filed, or if filed, justify the transfer. This being true it follows that the direction that the order be filed *nunc pro tunc*was likewise without legal effect and toid.

The entire order of transfer is therefore set aside.
##### 



Exhibit 3.1.2 STATEofDELAWARE
CERTIFICATEofAMENDMENT
OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION The Corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware does hereby certify: FIRST:That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of Total Entertainment Restaurant Corp.
resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment of the Certificate of
Incorporation of said corporation, declaring said amendment to be advisable and directing that the
amendment be considered by the stockholders of said Corporation at the Corporations next annual
stockholder meeting. The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows: RESOLVED,that the Certificate of Incorporation of this Corporation be amended
by changing the Article thereof numbered First so that, as amended, said Article
shall be and read as follows: First: The name of the corporation (hereinafter sometimes called
(the Corporation) is Fox & Hound Restaurant Group. SECOND:That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors, at the annual
meeting of the stockholders of said Corporation duly called and held upon notice in accordance with
Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, the necessary number of shares
as required by statute were voted in favor of the amendment. THIRD:That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. FOURTH:That the effective date of such amendment shall be May 20, 2005. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed this 18th day of
May, 2005. By:
    
    /s/ James K. ZielkeJames K. ZielkeChief Financial Officer, Secretary & Treasurer(Authorized Officer)
TOTAL ENTERTAINMENT RESTAURANT CORP.
                      REPORT ON FORM 10Q SEPTEMBER 7, 2004

                 CERTIFICATION BY STEVEN M. JOHNSON PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned, Chief Executive Officer of Total Entertainment Restaurant
Corp. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to the best of my knowledge, that the
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 7, 2004 (the "Periodic
Report") accompanying this certification fully complies with the requirements of
the Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



     Date October 21, 2004                /s/ Steven M. Johnson
         ------------------               -------------------------------------
                                          Steven M. Johnson
                                          Chief Executive Officer










EXHIBIT 32.1
Afghanistan-Pakistan Center of Excellence receives Director’s Annual Agency Team Award
 By None  , CENTCOM Public Affairs
  CENTCOM
 WASHINGTON (Dec. 2, 2010) — U.S. Central Command’s Afghanistan-Pakistan Center of Excellence (AFG-PAK COE) was awarded the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) Director’s Annual Agency Team Award at the 2010 Director’s 40th Annual Honorary Award Ceremony at Bolling Air Force Base today. Mr. David Spirk, the center’s deputy director, accepted the award for the overall team. The Afghanistan-Pakistan Center of Excellence was recognized for its “unprecedented success in its mission to lead, coordinate, integrate, and focus analysis efforts along with responsive, reliable and relevant all-source analysis to decision-makers conducting and supporting operations in Afghanistan and Pakistan.” The center produced more than 10,000 intelligence products and answered more than 1,000 official tasks within its first year.  The products are widely disseminated and used by units in the U.S. Central Command’s area of responsibility as well as by policy and decision makers for finding constructive, beneficial solutions to situations in Afghanistan and Pakistan. In response to an assessment of a Center of Excellence assessment, a sergeant from the 2nd Marine Division, Marine Expeditionary Brigade, wrote “Your team does some really good work over there, keep it up.” The Department of State’s Office of Interagency Resources and Planning reported that “The products that [the center’s staff] are producing are fantastic and I believe would be of great benefit to Embassy Kabul and especially the PRT teams.”
Docket: EBSA-2010-0011 

Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Dependent 

Coverage of Children to Age 26 Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0011-0001 

Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Dependent 

Coverage of Children to Age 26 Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: EBSA-2010-0011-DRAFT-0005 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-11391 

Submitter Information 

Name: Michael Murphy 

Address: 

Sarasota, FL, 

Email: srqmurph@verizon.net 

Organization: The Murphy Benefit Group 

General Comment 

My son (age 22) and daughter (age 24) are covered under my group health insurance as my 

dependants. It is the same premium whether I have 1 child or 1000 children covered. The PPAC 

makes my son ineligible for my coverage since he soon will be eligible through his employer. His 

emplyer requires a contribution that he cannot afford, thus he will opt out. Yet he still will not 

qualify as a dependent for my policy. Why the ineligiblity clause in the PPAC now when it will not 

be in 2014? 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION 

As of: July 21, 2010 

Received: May 21, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80af1cb0 

Comments Due: August 11, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 7/21/2010
# Journal officiel C 152/9 ju

| | ISSN 1725-2431 |
| --- | --- |
| Journal officiel
  de l'Union européenne | C 152 |
| | |
| Édition de langue française | Communications et informations | 47e année9 juin 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2431

Journal officiel

de l'Union européenne

C 152

Édition de langue française

Communications et informations

47e année9 juin 2004

---

| Numéro d'information | Sommaire | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Communications |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 152/1 | Taux de change de l'euro | 1 |

Numéro d'information

Sommaire

page

I   Communications

Commission

2004/C 152/1

Taux de change de l'euro

1

| FR | |
| --- | --- |

FR

---

I Communications

Commission

| 9.6.2004 | FR | Journal officiel de l'Union européenne | C 152/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2004

FR

Journal officiel de l'Union européenne

C 152/1

---

Taux de change de l'euro (1)

8 juin 2004

(2004/C 152/01)

1 euro=

| | Monnaie | Taux de change |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | dollar des États-Unis | 1,2294 |
| JPY | yen japonais | 135,08 |
| DKK | couronne danoise | 7,4349 |
| GBP | livre sterling | 0,66840 |
| SEK | couronne suédoise | 9,1040 |
| CHF | franc suisse | 1,5229 |
| ISK | couronne islandaise | 87,36 |
| NOK | couronne norvégienne | 8,1885 |
| BGN | lev bulgare | 1,9558 |
| CYP | livre chypriote | 0,58300 |
| CZK | couronne tchèque | 31,243 |
| EEK | couronne estonienne | 15,6466 |
| HUF | forint hongrois | 251,15 |
| LTL | litas lituanien | 3,4527 |
| LVL | lats letton | 0,6623 |
| MTL | lire maltaise | 0,4263 |
| PLN | zloty polonais | 4,5957 |
| ROL | leu roumain | 40 758 |
| SIT | tolar slovène | 239,1500 |
| SKK | couronne slovaque | 39,870 |
| TRL | lire turque | 1 811 841 |
| AUD | dollar australien | 1,7507 |
| CAD | dollar canadien | 1,6520 |
| HKD | dollar de Hong Kong | 9,5838 |
| NZD | dollar néo-zélandais | 1,9568 |
| SGD | dollar de Singapour | 2,0990 |
| KRW | won sud-coréen | 1 423,46 |
| ZAR | rand sud-africain | 8,0262 |

Monnaie

Taux de change

USD

dollar des États-Unis

1,2294

JPY

yen japonais

135,08

DKK

couronne danoise

7,4349

GBP

livre sterling

0,66840

SEK

couronne suédoise

9,1040

CHF

franc suisse

1,5229

ISK

couronne islandaise

87,36

NOK

couronne norvégienne

8,1885

BGN

lev bulgare

1,9558

CYP

livre chypriote

0,58300

CZK

couronne tchèque

31,243

EEK

couronne estonienne

15,6466

HUF

forint hongrois

251,15

LTL

litas lituanien

3,4527

LVL

lats letton

0,6623

MTL

lire maltaise

0,4263

PLN

zloty polonais

4,5957

ROL

leu roumain

40 758

SIT

tolar slovène

239,1500

SKK

couronne slovaque

39,870

TRL

lire turque

1 811 841

AUD

dollar australien

1,7507

CAD

dollar canadien

1,6520

HKD

dollar de Hong Kong

9,5838

NZD

dollar néo-zélandais

1,9568

SGD

dollar de Singapour

2,0990

KRW

won sud-coréen

1 423,46

ZAR

rand sud-africain

8,0262

---

(1)

Source: taux de change de référence publié par la Banque centrale européenne.

---
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.11 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-10-0000175 19-JAN-2016 10:20 AM
303 P.2d 671

#### RAY E. LUNDAHL CO., a corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 8485.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

Oct. 30, 1956.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 4, 1956.

John Ferebauer, Idaho Falls, for appellant.

Albaugh, Bloem, Barnard & Smith, Idaho Falls, Richards, Haga & Eberle, Boise, for respondent.

PORTER, Justice.

This case is the companion action to ■Case No. 8484, entitled Lundahl v. City of Idaho Falls, 78 Idaho 338, 303 P.2d 667. The two cases were consolidated for argument to this court. They state identical causes of action except that the plaintiff in Case No. 8484 is the owner of the damaged property and the plaintiff in this Case No. 8485 is the lessee of the garage alleged to have been damaged.

Under the authority of the decision filed this date in the case of Lundahl v. City of Idaho Falls, the judgment of dismissal entered in this cause is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court with instructions to vacate the judgment of dismissal, overrule the general demurrer, decide the questions raised by the special demurrer and to proceed in the premises. Costs to appellant.

TAYLOR, C. J., and KEETON, ANDERSON and SMITH, JJ., concur.
<Page>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.24

                    ASSIGNMENT OF REAL ESTATE SALE AGREEMENT

     For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
is hereby acknowledged, Goodman Financial Services, Inc., a Washington
corporation ("Assignor"), hereby assigns, transfers and sets over to BC-GFS II
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Assignee"), all of Assignor's right,
title and interest under that certain Real Estate Sale Agreement dated as of
March 26, 2003 by and between ERP Operating Limited Partnership, an Illinois
limited partnership, as Seller, and Assignor as Purchaser, as modified by Letter
Agreement dated as of April 24, 2003.

     DATED this 2nd day of May, 2003.


     ASSIGNOR:                         GOODMAN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.,
                                       a Washington corporation.

                                       By: /s/ John A. Goodman
                                          -----------------------
                                       Name: John A. Goodman
                                            ---------------------
                                       Its:     President
                                           ----------------------


     ASSIGNEE:                         BC-GFS II LLC,
                                       a Delaware limited liability company

                                       By: GFS Equity Management LLC, a
                                           Washington limited liability company,
                                           its manager


                                           By: /s/ John A. Goodman
                                              ---------------------------
                                                 John A. Goodman, Manager
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.04 MB)
 
 Inherent Resolve
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 130892(58) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130892 COA: 256619 Saginaw CC: 03-023168-FC DERRICK LASHON BRADDOCK, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s October 4, 2006 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

d0122 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 29, 2007

Clerk