alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23

The Board of Directors
Trans Pacific Bancorp:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement 
(Form S-8 No. 33-39190) pertaining to the Trans Pacific Bancorp Employee Stock 
Ownership Plan and Trust and in the registration statement (Form S-8 No. 33-
39191) pertaining to the Trans Pacific Bancorp  Non Qualified Stock Option 
Plan, of our report dated February 7, 1997, relating to the consolidated 
balance sheets of Trans Pacific Bancorp and Subsidiary as of December 31, 
1996, and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes 
in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-
year period ended December 31, 1996, which report appears in the December 31, 
1996 annual report of Trans Pacific Bancorp incorporated by reference in this 
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.

/s/KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
San Francisco, California
March 10, 1997
AMENDMENT TO THE
ALPHARMA INC. NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR OPTION PLAN



The Alpharma Inc. Non-Employee Director Option Plan (the "Plan") is hereby amended effective as of June 22, 2006, as follows:



1.     Section 13 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following to the end thereof:

"Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board of Directors has delegated to the executive management Benefits Committee the authority to adopt administrative amendments to the Plan, provided, that such amendments do not involve a change in the costs or liability of the Company or alter the benefits payable thereunder.  The Board of Directors has delegated to the Compensation Committee the authority to adopt all other amendments to the Plan, provided, that such amendments do not significantly increase or decrease benefit amounts, or  are  required  to be adopted by the Board of Directors under the Code or the regulations thereunder.  The Board of Directors retains the authority to adopt amendments to the Plan that significantly increase or decrease benefit amounts, or are required to be adopted by the Board of Directors under the Code or regulations thereunder."



*	*	*

|/s/ George P. Rose | October 23, 2006
|------------------ | ----------------
|ALPHARMA INC.      | DATE
Hillsborough,

Dec., 1900.

#### Broderick, *Assignee, v.*Richardson.

Where a mortgagor of goods and fixtures retains possession of the property, selling for his own benefit and replenishing the stock from time to time, the mortgage is valid as against Ms assignee in insolvency, in the absence of actual fraud.

Assumpsit, by the assignee in insolvency of the estate of Joseph Dignam, to recover the proceeds of the sale of fixtures in the store of the insolvent. Facts agreed.

July 23 1895, Dignam executed a mortgage to Eleanor Ferguson of “ all stock in trade and fixtures now situate in store No. 797 Elm St., Manchester,” to secure the payment of a debt of $1,000 due her from him. He afterward sold the stock, replacing it with new from time to time and using the proceeds as he saw fit, with the knowledge and consent of Ferguson. April 13, 1896, the defendant, a deputy sheriff, attached the stock and fixtures on a claim against Dignam, and May 5, 1896, sold them at sheriff’s sale. The net amount received from the fixtures was $426.65, which he paid to Ferguson July 28, 1896. July 6, 1896, Dignam filed his petition in insolvency, and July 15, 1896, he was decreed insolvent, and the defendant was appointed messenger. August 20, 1896, the defendant paid the net amount received from the sale of the stock ($120.06) to the plaintiff, who had previous to that time been appointed assignee of Dignam’s estate. October 17, 1896, the plaintiff made a demand for the proceeds of the sale of the fixtures of the defendant, which he refused to pay.

*Sullivan & Broderick,*for the plaintiff.

*Elijah M. Topliff,*for the defendant. '

Wallace, J.

The plaintiff’s claim that the constructive fraud of the parties in dealing with the mortgaged property made the mortgage voidable by him, tinder the doctrine of *Putnam*v. *Osgood,*51 N. H. 192, and similar eases, cannot be maintained. The recent case of *Thompson v. Esty,*69 N. H. 55, held that only actual fraud would enable the assignee of an insolvent debtor to avoid transactions in fraud of creditors under the insolvent law. P. S., *c.*201, s. 26. In *Hodgdon*v. *Libby,*69 N. H. 136, the same doctrine was applied, although the second mortgage in that case was *574.given after the amendment to the insolvency law vesting in the assignee “ all property which might have been taken on execution upon a judgment ” against the debtor (Laws 1895, *e.*68) went into effect. This case is not distinguishable from and is determined by *Hodgdon*v. *Libby.*The whole amount received from the sale of the mprtgaged property belonged to the mortgagee, unless the right of attaching creditors intervened. In neither event could the assignee take any part of the funds without first paying the mortgage debt.

*Judgment for the defendant.*

All concurred;
XAITHE

Couri oF c^mwctl f\Ppe<»[s

r

ORIGINAL

/ HFs Trf TF Of TPxflS ^4Fpf^

JUW 10 2015

F&otv\TlnC Court of OPPtals **** Asosta, Cto&

^ihe f/GHTK O/5-fnc-f of Tfxfl5

CQOie ,uo. o*-13-00 a 17 c£

^eT(T|0^ Tor ^iscrctioiUQr-; *£<//«u;

* FILED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

10 201a

Abel Acosta, Clerk

TOcl ro iuo, / £69777

x
qiv/fi/ co^s^-f bg fftW-W ^M* . A-Mor^ey of ita fi6J>T

*4^J /<j,w $'i«*"ihp be-ftfr{ ko/voofi«fe}« Jt/ci&fi .......

*

Wello.^ <Wu,.,J ^rrsc^J w,/u„w&„ j^,^.^^4 (J) u/M

twj

ft €for-I m fl<= cure' vo 1.3 of £ v0\,

P/>6<? I |
TfitZtt Of co/vTt7uT5

JfAffeWfA/r (Ifb^J^fJ^ ofcA f\R.<i\) {newt _ _ 11

TftfylC of co/ule^i5 _ *??

lA/oex or ^uTHo^iFiFi w *

smrefneNToF <a$s

°' fr°L^^flL Mi*r0«y_ _"

Cqa/c(uJ/o^ Aft/Q Pro*/Gft

$ PPtWQ /X65

Pfl:6'-f I » I
TNOFK of Author i ties

HjUL ^5 4.uJ,-2 0 At S$L - _ 3

^uiseou gjss 'Sm'Z'J at *£a-&73 . _ _ * 3

Tfx/br cade c(',vn,Proc, Art. '"5X6*1 i'J* "_•• . -._ - _ . ^^1. S

Terns fe<uU thJt i ^,0^*5) -.\> ^ _ - .^ _,. ^,^ .y^\lj5 j

* *»

piy
STATeMfA/T of THf CfiSb

SflmoEt QvaAj? mtG,ejt/ ftffElfi/ot Here \aj aa>0

P\t*d A/bifc GmUi i<> tKe ckrOe i^Oidme^t j^ ccxuie ajojCMMU

to tkfc d-ffe^/e of Cg/ji/AJUousd Sequel ab$JSe of fl cl,(J ^(leJ6^J

to Kciue bee*; ca^V*,f+eJ Azov/. <l aool lAru Oec, /& 8Loi&(\)

Q/U ju/ue "n ap/3 fAe ^axe koceeJed io (oil fe'/ Jurv (a")

TAd Xry /leW/u?J c uecdict of 6utH/.f3) fl/vc/ ^ssesJ^J

fiPPeluiJis PoAjiik metji f\ I CcjU tuvemmt "for'H i&t/S fy<u the.

TetAS, Op Pad mc^i of c f1m «<v J J u% I)l a ia»-s4i7 ui /oa<:| OhjiUqaj CH)

JvdLerneAji fitud SQnjtewct uudS 57*/ &ej Jo/ue /V #0 /3 f.S>

(ttWS) fHKs) See flft^df.V 6

0*fc*" 1
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 27, 2022

NO. 03

- 21

- 00635

- CV

L. M. , Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JU STIC ES GOODWIN, BAKER AND TRIANA

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court on December 1, 2021

. Having reviewed

the record and the parties ’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s order

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s order

. Because appellant is

indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
 FINANCIAL OFFICER, PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned officer of FCCC, Inc. hereby certifies that (a) FCCC Inc’s Amendment No. 1 to its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Annual Report”), and the Annual Report, as amended, fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (b) information contained in this Amendment and the Annual Report, as amended, fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of FCCC, Inc.





In connection with the Annual Report of FCCC, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bernard Zimmerman, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Company.




Date: February 7, 2012
By:Bernard ZimmermanPresident, Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES


                                                                   Exhibit 32.1


                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Comprehensive Care Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending May 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 5, 2003 (the "Report"), Mary
Jane Johnson, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of her knowledge, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                        /s/ Mary Jane Johnson
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Mary Jane Johnson
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        September 5, 2003


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to SS. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Comprehensive Care
Corporation and will be retained by Comprehensive Care Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                      62
Docket: EBSA-2010-0007 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in 

Retirement Plans 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0007-0001 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options 

Document: EBSA-2010-0007-DRAFT-0004 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: Thomas Luby 

Address: 

Atlanta, GA, 

Email: Thomas@Luby.com 

Organization: N/A 

General Comment 

This is an absolutely horrible idea. Please stay out of my retirement planning. In fact, just get rid 

of the SSA and let me manage my own funds. 

To repeat, this is an absolutely horrible idea and the concept should be scrapped immediately. 

Sincerely, 

Thomas Luby 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: February 17, 2010 

Received: February 03, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80a8ca96 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 2/17/2010
- tAugust 11, 2010 

Office ofConsumer Information and Insurance Oversight 


Department ofHealth and Human Services . 


Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 


P.O. Box 8016 


Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 


Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Below are my comments regarding the Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health 

-,. - Insurance Coverage Relating to Status as a Grandfathered Health -Plan Underihe~Patient 

Protection and Affordable Care Act (pP ACA). 


I believe that every effort should be made to increase the number ofindividuals covered by 

PPACA, especially as of January 1, 2014 when most ofthe reform components (Insurance 

Exchanges, Subsidies, Tax Credits, etc.) come into play. 

The average consumer has a broad definition of "benefits." Consumers view their health plan 

beyond the covered benefits, cost sharing, and the contribution levels associated with the plan. 

It is my opinion that the Rule may still result in some confusion to the marketplace in its 

application. For example, if an employer raised the copayment level beyond the maximum in one 

area (i.e. outpatient services) but retained the copayment level for primary care doctor visits, 

does that mean a loss ofgrandfather status? Clarity will be critical both for the employer and the; 

employee. 

Even by the most optimistic estimates, a substantial portion ofthe employee population will 

remain outside the PPACA as ofJanuary 2014 based on the current rules. While I understand the 

difficulty involved in making change, creating another large sub-population of excluded 

individuals will only add to costs, increase confusion, and mitigate the potential impact ofthe 

legislation. 

The Rule needs to be clear, reasonable, and with no ambiguities involved in determining whether 

a group health plan is "in or out." The decisions the federal government makes today will 

detennine the outcomes fortomorrow. We may need to make some difficult decisions to create 

a sustainable health care system that will support a growing economy in the future. That means 

getting as many citizens across the country participating at the beginning to make it work and 

delivering on its promises to retain their support. 

~oufor the o=:comment on this regulation. 

LoniKochan
RVAAC	Communications	Sub - committee #11 January	8,	2015 1:00 - 3:00	PM Agenda Call -in	Number: 888 - 396 - 7314	or	773 - 756 - 0935 Password: 8020595 CART: **www.streamtext.net/player?event=ACCEESSBOARD010815** 1. Welcome	and	Self

-introductions 2. Brief	Review	of November	teleconference meeting  Melissa	Shurland	(FRA)discussed	back	up	power	for	the	variable message	systems,	she	stated	there	were	no	FRA	regulations	that would	prevent	the	VMS	system	being	connected	to	the	emergency power	system  There	was	a	discussion	of	how	emergency	communications	are made	to	passengers  The	use	of	the	Hearing	Loop	symbol	on	trains	was	discussed. Interior	and	exterior	signs	were	recommended,	also	whether	the interior	sign	should	light	up	when	the	PA	system	was	used.  There	was	a	discussion	of	whether	the	VMS	had	to	be	exactly	the same	as	the	audible	message	and	if	the	audible	had	to	be	played every	time	the	VMS	was	used,	or	could	the	VMS	stay	lit	and	over the time	the	audible	message	was repeated as	for stop announcements . 3. Discuss	requirements	for	alarms	system	requirements	for	rail	vehicles 4. Discuss	where	the	International	Symbol	of	Accessibility	should	be required. 5. Discuss final	report	to the	full	committee 6. Next	meeting: Full	Committee	meeting	in	DC	February	26	and	27 7. Adjourn [No	Attachments]
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.79 MB)
 
 JIm Mattis SecDef Afghanistan
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
§ 850.15 Marine casualty investigation by the Board. ( a ) The Board may conduct an investigation under the Act of any major marine casualty or any casualty involving public and nonpublic vessels. Where the Board determines it will convene a hearing in connection with such an investigation, the Board's rules of practice for transportation accident hearings in 49 CFR part 845 shall apply.
( b ) The Board shall conduct an investigation under the Act when: ( 1 ) The casualty involves a Coast Guard and a nonpublic vessel and at least one fatality or $75,000 in property damage; or
( 2 ) The Commandant and the Board agree that the Board shall conduct the investigation, and the casualty involves a public and a nonpublic vessel and at least one fatality or $75,000 in property damage; or
( 3 ) The Commandant and the Board agree that the Board shall conduct the investigation, and the casualty is a major marine casualty which involves significant safety issues relating to Coast Guard safety functions.
[47 FR 46090, Oct. 15, 1982]
# USAFCENT tri-wing integration generates rapid airpower 

/ Published Feb. 17, 2021
AL DHAFRA AIR BASE, United Arab Emirates, 
Three air expeditionary wings assigned to U.S. Air Forces Central participated in an integrated combat turn exercise, Feb. 13, 2021.The ICT exercise specifically tested Airmen deployed as an instrument of Dynamic Force Employment, the 335th Expeditionary Fighter Squadron, currently assigned to the 380th Air Expeditionary Wing here.“Our Dynamic Force Employment squadrons consistently deliver combat airpower suited for the expeditionary and evolving character of this theater,” said Brig. Gen. Larry Broadwell, 380th AEW commander. “Because of its episodic nature, the DFE construct inherently provides operational unpredictability and a competitive edge for regional forces. DFE is a key accelerant to the changes we need in the future.”DFE Airmen were challenged to execute a one-day, synchronized plan involving both airlift and fighter assets, as well as provide organic maintenance and logistics support for an ICT.“An ICT is concurrent servicing of fuel and munitions, while aircraft engines are still running,” said U.S. Air Force Capt. Justin Reese, 335th EFS director of maintenance. “ICTs are a force multiplier that produce higher sortie and strike capability across a range of contested environments, while minimizing the logistics footprint to support the aircraft.”On the day of execution, maintainers and equipment from the 380th AEW were airlifted using 386th AEW C-130 Hercules aircraft from Ali Al Salem Air Base, Kuwait. The group arrived at Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar with just enough time to set up their own equipment and “turn” two F-15E Strike Eagles from the 335th EFS back into the air to execute an air tasking order.Reese further explained that the whole exercise served as an Agile Combat Employment capstone event for the 335th EFS, which it had prepared to execute before the DFE deployment. The maintainers had tested and finalized tactics, techniques, and procedures for the last three years while at their home station at Seymour-Johnson Air Force Base, North Carolina.“Not only were the mission objectives accomplished, but this served as a proof of concept for in-theater ACE operations and set the stage for future capabilities,” said Reese.Prior to the mission, maintenance professionals from the 379th AEW worked with their 380th AEW counterparts to plan the event.“The 379th AEW were pivotal to the planning and success of our ACE demonstration. Their teams worked with our team to build a safe and executable plan for the event,” said 1st Lt. Garrett Parks, 380th Expeditionary Aircraft Maintenance Squadron sortie generation flight commander. “The teams collaborated to work through challenges and modify timelines and produced success on all sides.”
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

### ★
▲ ▲

▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 05/22 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 22 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 77.38 WMeters AGL
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------


             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350, AS ADOPTED
              PURSUANT TO SS.906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report of Spire Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB (the "Report") for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Christian
Dufresne, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: March 30, 2007                 By: /s/ Christian Dufresne
                                          -----------------------------
                                          Christian Dufresne
                                          Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer