This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making prior to the adoption of the final

rules. 

# Proposed Rules Federal Register 

### 24640

Vol. 77, No. 80

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

**DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE**

**Agricultural Marketing Service**

**7 CFR Part 930**

**[Doc. No. AMS–FV–11–0092; FV12–930–1 PR]** 

**Tart Cherries Grown in the State of Michigan, et al.; Increasing the Primary**  **Reserve Capacity and Revising Exemption Requirements** 

**AGENCY :**  Agricultural Marketing Service,

USDA.

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule.

**SUMMARY :**  This rule invites comments on proposed revisions to the primary inventory reserve capacity and the exemption provisions applicable to handler diversion activities prescribed under the marketing order for tart cherries (order). The order regulates the handling of tart cherries grown in the States of Michigan, New York, Pennsylvania, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wisconsin, and is administered locally by the Cherry Industry Administrative Board (Board).
This action would increase the volume of tart cherries that can be placed in the primary inventory reserve from 50 million pounds to 100 million pounds and would revise exemption provisions by limiting diversion credits for new market development and market expansion activities to one year. These changes are intended to facilitate sales and lessen the impact of market expansion activities on volume
restriction calculations.

**DATES :**  Comments must be received by May 10, 2012.

**ADDRESSES :**  Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments concerning this proposal. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or

Internet: http://www.regulations.gov. All comments should reference the
document number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and will be made available for public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: http:// www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in response to this rule will
be included in the record and will be made available to the public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals or entities submitting the comments will be made public on the Internet at the address provided above.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Jennie M. Varela, Marketing Specialist, or Christian D. Nissen, Regional Manager, Southeast Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (863) 324– 3775, Fax: (863) 325–8793, or Email: Jennie.Varela@ams.usda.gov or Christian.Nissen@ams.usda.gov.

Small businesses may request information on complying with this regulation by contacting Laurel May, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720– 2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email: Laurel.May@ams.usda.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  This proposal is issued under Marketing Order No. 930, as amended (7 CFR part 930), regulating the handling of tart cherries grown in the States of Michigan, New York, Pennsylvania, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wisconsin, hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’

The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order

12866.

This proposal has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended
to have retroactive effect.

The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.

This rule invites comments on proposed revisions to the primary inventory reserve capacity and the exemption provisions applicable to handler diversion activities prescribed
under the order. This action would
increase the volume of tart cherries that can be placed in the primary inventory reserve from 50 million pounds to 100 million pounds and would revise exemption provisions by limiting
diversion credits for new market development and market expansion activities to one year. These changes are
intended to facilitate sales and lessen the impact of new market development and market expansion activities on
volume restriction calculations. These changes were recommended by the Board at its meetings on September 15, 2011, and November 2, 2011, respectively.

Section 930.55 of the order provides authority for the establishment of a primary inventory reserve as part of the order’s volume control provisions. Section 930.50(i) of the order establishes a cap of 50 million pounds on the primary inventory reserve, but provides authority to raise that limit if necessary, provided that any recommendation for change is made by the Board on or before September 30 to become effective for the following crop year.

Section 930.59 of the order authorizes
handler diversion. When volume regulation is in effect, handlers may fulfill any restricted percentage requirement in full or in part by acquiring diversion certificates or by voluntarily diverting cherries or cherry products in a program approved by the Board, rather than placing cherries in an inventory reserve. These eligible diversion activities include, in part, use for new market development and market expansion activities.


### 24641 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 25, 2012 / Proposed Rules

Section 930.159 of the order’s administrative rules specifies methods of handler diversion, including using cherries or cherry products for exempt purposes prescribed under § 930.162.
Section 930.162 establishes the terms and conditions of exemption that must
be satisfied for handlers to receive diversion certificates for exempt uses. Section 930.162(b) defines the activities which qualify for exemptions including new market development and market expansion. New market development and market expansion activities include, but are not limited to, sales of cherries into markets that are not yet commercially established, product line extensions, or segmentation of markets along geographic or other definable
characteristics.

In July 2011, the Board established an ad hoc committee (committee) to examine the volume regulation process
under the order and recommend changes that might benefit the industry.
The committee made a series of recommendations, mostly administrative in nature, which were discussed by the entire Board at its September and November meetings. The recommended administrative changes were approved by the Board and the proposed changes to the primary reserve
and diversion credits for market expansion activities, are the subject of
this action.

The order provides for the use of volume regulation to stabilize prices and improve grower returns during periods of oversupply. At the beginning of each season, the Board examines production and sales data to determine whether a volume regulation is necessary and if so, announces free and restricted percentages to limit the
volume of tart cherries on the market. Free percentage cherries can be used to supply any available market, including domestic markets for pie filling, water packed, and frozen tart cherries. Restricted percentage cherries can be placed in reserve, marketed through exempt activities, including market expansion, or diverted in orchard or at the processing plant.

When using reserves to meet their restricted percentage, handlers have two inventory reserve pools available, a primary reserve currently limited to 50 million pounds and an unlimited secondary reserve. Reserves allow the industry to mitigate the impact of oversupply in large crop years, while allowing the industry to supply markets in years when production falls below demand. Volume in the secondary
reserve cannot be released unless the primary reserve is empty. Most reserve inventory flows in and out of the primary reserve, and it is rarely at zero, making it difficult to release volume from the secondary reserve.

Accessing reserves, particularly at the beginning of a crop year when the new crop has yet to be harvested, has become more important in recent seasons. When the order was promulgated, tart cherries were primarily processed as ingredients or into pie filling and a 50 million pound primary reserve met the needs of the industry. However, dried cherries, juice, and juice concentrate are growing segments of the industry, and some handlers are also manufacturing finished products for retail. The additional processing steps for these new products, as well as the growing variety of retail products have changed reserve needs. At any given time,
handlers now hold more volume in

reserve.

Additionally, in years when a crop is short or demand exceeds expectations,
the Board can vote to issue a reserve release. During the 2010–2011 season, the Board found it necessary to issue
two such releases. The Board believes increasing the capacity of the primary reserve to 100 million pounds would
facilitate the release of reserve cherries when they are needed. Moving
additional reserve volume into the primary pool, which is easier to access, should allow the industry to be more responsive to changes in demand and supply, and allow handlers more flexibility in how they utilize the
reserve. The intent of this action is not
to increase the volume of cherries in reserve, but to shift a greater volume into the primary reserve where it is
more accessible to meet handler needs. This change should not impact volume
restriction calculations.

Accordingly, at its meeting on September 15, 2011, the Board recommended increasing the capacity of the primary inventory reserve from 50 million pounds to 100 million pounds.
Fifteen Board members voted for this change and two abstained.

In addition to discussing the primary reserve, the Board also considered changes to diversion credits. These
credits are a handler’s alternative to placing fruit in reserve in order to comply with their restricted percentage
under volume restriction. The order provides that fruit used for certain exempt purposes, including new market development and market expansion, is eligible to receive diversion credits. Market expansion is defined as an activity that expands the sale of either tart cherries or the products in which tart cherries are an ingredient. The Board currently limits the duration of any diversion credit for new market development and market expansion to three years.

The Board believes that new market development and market expansion
activities have been successful in increasing sales. Some Board members expressed that these activities have been very helpful in developing the dried cherry and juice segments. Earlier regulations limited the volume that
could receive diversion credit to 10 million pounds. However, the Board
believed the limitation could be discouraging expansion and in 2006 recommended removing the diversion
credit volume limitations. Since that time, the use of new market development and market expansion activities to meet restricted percentages has grown. The current three-year average for diversion credit for market expansion activities is approximately 35 million pounds a year.

In its discussions of this issue, the Board sought to find a solution that would continue to encourage new market development and market expansion projects, but reduce the impact these credits have on volume
restriction calculations. While market expansion activities designated for diversion credit represent about 15 percent of gross sales, these sales are not included in the average sales figure used to determine optimum supply for volume regulation. The Board estimates that limiting credits to one year would lower the annual average credit for market expansion to 16 million pounds, or 19 million pounds below the current

average.

With this action, it is anticipated that
the difference in volume between the three-year credit and one year credit for market expansion would shift to free sales helping to reduce the calculated restricted percentage. Using current numbers, assuming that the difference of 19 million pounds would be counted as free sales, this change would reduce the calculated surplus. Reducing the calculated surplus would, in turn, help lower restricted percentages. The Board believes this change would help make
the calculations under volume regulation more reflective of industry
conditions.

Accordingly, at its November 2, 2011, meeting, the Board voted unanimously to revise exemption provisions applicable to handler diversion activities by limiting diversion credits for market expansion activities to one year, with the time limit beginning with the date of the first shipment. The Board also noted that projects approved prior
to this action would be allowed to finish their three-year cycle.


### 24642 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 25, 2012 / Proposed Rules

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.

The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that they are brought about through group action of essentially small entities acting on their own
behalf.

There are approximately 40 handlers of tart cherries who are subject to regulation under the marketing order and approximately 600 producers of tart cherries in the regulated area. Small agricultural service firms have been defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) as those having annual receipts of less than $7,000,000, and small agricultural producers are defined as those having annual receipts of less than $750,000 (13 CFR 121.201).

According to the National Agricultural Statistics Service, and Board data, the average annual grower price for tart cherries during the 2010– 11 season was $0.221 per pound, and total shipments were around 270 million pounds. Therefore, average receipts for tart cherry producers were around $99,000, well below the SBA threshold for small producers. In 2010,
The Food Institute estimated an f.o.b. price of $0.84 per pound for frozen tart cherries, which make up the majority of processed tart cherries. Using this data, average annual handler receipts were about $5.7 million, also below the SBA threshold for small agricultural service firms. Assuming a normal distribution, the majority of producers and handlers of tart cherries may be classified as
small entities.

This action would increase the
volume of tart cherries that can be placed in the primary inventory reserve from 50 million pounds to 100 million pounds and would revise the exemption provisions pertaining to handler diversion activities by limiting
diversion credits for new market development and market expansion activities to one year. These changes are
intended to facilitate sales and lessen the impact of such activities on volume
restriction calculations. This rule would add § 930.155 to the rules and regulations to establish the increased limit for the primary inventory reserve, and would revise § 930.162 of the regulations regarding exemptions as they pertain to handler diversion activities. The authority for these actions is provided in §§ 930.50 and
930.59 of the order. The Board recommended these actions at meetings on September 15, 2011, and November

2, 2011.

The Board believes these changes would better align regulations with industry needs and practices, facilitate the release of restricted fruit, and help
avoid over-restriction. It is not anticipated that this action would impose additional costs on handlers or growers, regardless of size. Handlers of all sizes could realize a cost savings by not having to store product relegated to the secondary reserve, which is difficult

to access.

Further, increasing the maximum volume that can be held in the primary
reserve would allow handlers to be more responsive to industry needs by making reserves easier to access in periods of short supply or increased demand, which could facilitate sales. Changes in processing and cherry products have created a situation in which handlers may have more volume on hand at any given time, furthering the need to access reserves. Expanding the volume available in the primary
reserve would assist handlers in managing their stocks and would help maintain a steady inventory of finished products to supply retailers and

consumers.

Additionally, the Board believes limiting diversion credits for market expansion to one year would move more sales into the free sales category for purposes of computing volume regulations. This would reduce the calculated surplus, and in turn lower
restrictions. Lower restrictions would allow handlers to have a greater portion
of their volume available for free sales.
This could facilitate additional sales which could improve returns for growers and handlers.

This rule is expected to benefit producers, handlers, and consumers. The effects of this rule are not expected to be disproportionately greater or less for small handlers or producers than for larger entities.

The Committee discussed alternatives to these changes, including not increasing the primary reserve capacity, as well as eliminating diversion credits for market expansion rather than limiting them to one year. Regarding the change to primary reserve capacity, the Board agreed that changes in the industry necessitated this change and that it was in the industry’s best interest to have this change in place by the next season. In discussing the change to diversion credits for market expansion, the Board considered phasing out diversion credits for market expansion altogether. However, some Board members believed that offering
diversion credit for these activities had been beneficial to the industry and thus should not be eliminated entirely. The Board believes limiting credits to a maximum of one year would continue to encourage handlers to enter new markets, but lessen the impact on
volume restriction calculations. Therefore, these alternatives were rejected.

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the order’s information collection requirements have been previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and assigned OMB No. 0581–0177, (Tart
Cherries Grown in the States of Michigan, New York, Pennsylvania, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wisconsin). No changes in those requirements as a result of this action are necessary. Should any changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval.

Accordingly, this action would not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements on either small or large tart cherry handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry and public sector agencies.

AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and services, and for other purposes.

USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or conflict with this proposed rule.

The Board formed a committee to review the order’s volume regulation procedures and suggest changes to the Board. This committee held meetings
where these issues were discussed in detail. These meetings were public meetings and both large and small entities were able to participate and express their views. In addition, the Board’s meetings were widely publicized throughout the tart cherry industry and all interested persons were invited to attend and participate in
Board deliberations on all issues. Like all Board meetings, the September 15, 2011, and November 2, 2011, meetings were public meetings and all entities,


### 24643 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 25, 2012 / Proposed Rules

both large and small, were able to express views on this issue. Finally, interested persons are invited to submit comments on this proposed rule, including the regulatory and informational impacts of this action on
small businesses.

A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: www.ams.usda.gov/ MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Laurel May at the previously mentioned address in the

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**
section.

A 15-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to respond to this proposal. Fifteen days is deemed appropriate because the Board would like to have this rule in place as soon as possible so handlers can consider these changes when making plans for the upcoming season. Further, handlers are aware of these proposed changes,
which were discussed and recommended at public meetings and interested parties had the opportunity to provide input. All written comments timely received will be considered
before a final determination is made on
this matter.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 930

Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Tart
cherries.

For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 930 is proposed to
be amended as follows:

**PART 930—TART CHERRIES GROWN IN THE STATES OF MICHIGAN, NEW**  **YORK, PENNSYLVANIA, OREGON, UTAH, WASHINGTON, AND** 
**WISCONSIN**

1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 930 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.

2. A new § 930.150 is added to read
as follows:

**§ 930.150 Primary inventory reserve.**

Beginning July 1, 2012, the primary inventory reserve may not to exceed 100 million pounds.

3. Section 930.162 is amended by adding a sentence at the end of section (b)(2) to read as follows:

**§ 930.162 Exemptions.**

* * * * *

(b) * * * (2) * * * In addition, shipments of tart cherries or tart cherry products in new market development and market expansion outlets are eligible for handler diversion credit for a period of one year from the handler’s first date of shipment into such outlets.

* * * * *

Dated: April 17, 2012. David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing

Service.

[FR Doc. 2012–9860 Filed 4–24–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3410–02–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 39**

**[Docket No. FAA–2012–0421; Directorate Identifier 2012–NM–042–AD]** 

**RIN 2120–AA64**

**Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

**SUMMARY :**  We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Boeing Company Model 757 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a report of in-flight fracture of the right windshield (window 1) on the flight deck and multiple reports of electrical arcs at the terminal blocks of the flight deck windshields resulting in smoke and fire. This proposed AD would require repetitive inspections of
electrical heat terminals on the left and right windshields for damage, and corrective actions if necessary. This proposed AD would also allow for replacing an affected windshield with a windshield equipped with different electrical connections, which would terminate the repetitive inspections for that windshield. We are proposing this AD to prevent smoke and fire in the flight deck, which can lead to loss of visibility, and injuries to or incapacitation of the flight crew.

**DATES :**  We must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 11, 2012.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

• Fax: 202–493–2251.

• Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. • Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124– 2207; telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; email me.boecom@boeing.com ; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–

1221.

Examining the AD Docket

You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is in the

**ADDRESSES** section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Elias Natsiopoulos, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM– 130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6478; fax: 425–917– 6590; email: Elias.Natsiopoulos@faa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

Comments Invited

We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the **ADDRESSES** section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA– 2012–0421; Directorate Identifier 2012– NM–042–AD’’ at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed AD because of those

comments.

We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each