alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 549

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 8, 2002.

Whereas the people of the United States and Great Britain

have a history of shared values and mutual respect for

one another;

Whereas the Governments of the United States and Great

Britain are close allies and share a deep and abiding

friendship based on a shared commitment to democratic

values;

Whereas the United States and Great Britain understand the

commitment to defend freedom and democracy regardless

of the costs involved;

Whereas British Prime Minister Tony Blair has displayed exceptional leadership in the war on terrorism; and

Whereas the United States and Great Britain have been provoked into a war on terrorism that threatens the security

of both nations: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) expresses sincere appreciation for Prime Minister Tony Blair for his leadership in the war on terrorism;

(2) expresses its deepest sympathy to British victims of terrorism and their families, including the 67
2

•HRES 549 EH

British citizens who were victims of the terrorist attack

on September 11, 2001;

(3) commends the efforts of British intelligence and

defense agencies for their continued efforts in the war on

terrorism; and

(4) reaffirms the strong and special relationship between the people of the United States and Great Britain.

Attest:

Clerk.
TOTAL ENTERTAINMENT RESTAURANT CORP.
                        REPORT ON FORM 10Q JUNE 15, 2004

                 CERTIFICATION BY STEVEN M. JOHNSON PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned, Chief Executive Officer of Total Entertainment Restaurant
Corp. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to the best of my knowledge, that the
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 23, 2004 (the "Periodic
Report") accompanying this certification fully complies with the requirements of
the Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



     Date    July 30, 2004                /s/ STEVEN M. JOHNSON
         ----------------------------     --------------------------------------
                                          Steven M. Johnson
                                          Chief Executive Officer




EXHIBIT 32.1

                                     - 18 -
FIRST AMENDMENT

OF THE

A.L. Pharma Inc. Supplemental Pension Plan

		WHEREAS, Alpharma Inc. (the "Company") (formerly known as A.L. Pharma Inc.) maintains the A.L. Pharma Inc. Supplemental Pension Plan (the "Plan"); and

		WHEREAS, the Company desires to change the name of the Plan to be consistent with the name of the Company; and

		WHEREAS, the Company desires to decrease the vesting requirement under the Plan from ten years to five years; and

		WHEREAS, the Plan has been amended and further amendment of the Plan is now considered necessary and desirable to reflect the aforementioned changes;

		NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED that, in accordance with the power reserved to the Company by section 4 of the Plan, and pursuant to resolutions adopted by the Compensation Committee of the Company on May 7, 1998, the Plan, as previously amended, be and it hereby is further amended, effective as of July 1, 1998, as follows:

			The following shall be substituted as Section 2.3 of the Plan:

2.3	Vesting.	If a participant resigns or is dismissed from the employ of the Company and all of its controlled group members prior to completing at least five years of employment service with the Company or any of its controlled group, the participant shall not be entitled to any benefit under the Plan.

 

			*	*	*

	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment of the A.L. Pharma Inc. Supplemental Pension Plan to be executed on its behalf on the ___ day of _______________, 1998.

Alpharma Inc.

By:______________________________

Its:______________________________

ATTEST:

By:______________________________

Its:______________________________
1210-AB32-2-1499.html[7/26/2015 6:08:59 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwk-fw6w

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1995

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: J. Gordon Rhodes

Address:

Rhodes Securities, Inc

306

Fort Worth, TX, 76102

Email: gr@rsi2.com

Phone: 817-334-0455

General Comment

Our country simply isn't saving enough. As one of the more than 26,000 plus financial advisers in the State of

 Texas, I can tell you the best way to secure a better financial future for our communities and our country is to

 ensure all retirement planners have access to the advice and guidance they need to succeed.

With so many of these savers in Fort Worth, TX entrusting me with the monumental task of planning their

 financial futures, I refuse to support any regulation that will negatively impact their choice, cost, or access to

 sound advice.

However, the Department of Labor's (DOL) proposed retirement regulation will be devastating for small and

 medium savers who typically rely on my advice. Under this regulation I will no longer be able to offer some of

 my clients face-to-face retirement advice. Not only does this regulation add a complicated step to saving, it

 forces my clients to choose between no advice, or spending more money on services they don't necessarily need.

While everyone is for a best interests standard, I find it hard to believe that this is it. Thank you for taking my

 comment.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated March 31, 2011 on the 2010 consolidated financial statements included in the annual report of Comprehensive Care Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2010. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-136744, File No. 333-127778, File No. 333-108561, File No. 333-44437 and
File No. 333-15929).



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.
|                             
|March 31, 2011               
|Clearwater, Florida
Hillsborough,

June, 1899.

#### Robinson *v.*Burke.

Damages recovered for the conversion'of property exempt from attachment may be reached by trustee process in the hands of the judgment debtor.

Motion, by Gleason, for stay of execution in *Robinson*v. *Burke.*After tlie plaintiff had recovered judgment in this action, which is trover against a deputy sheriff for attaching goods which were exempt from attachment, Gleason, a creditor of Robinson and not a party to any prior proceedings, sued him, summoned Burke as trustee, and moved for stay of execution until his action against Robinson should be determined. Robinson opposed this motion upon the ground that the verdict so far partook of the nature of the property converted as to be itself exempt from attachment. Execution was stayed, and Robinson excepted.

*David W. Berkins,*for Robinson.

*Andrews & Andrews,*for Burke.

*William W Porbes,*for Gleason.

Young, J.

All property which can be taken on execution can be attached on mesne process. P. S., *c.*220, *s.*1. At common law, all the debtor’s property, with a few trifling exceptions not material in this case, could be taken on execution, and it follows that all of his property which is not exempted by statute can be taken now. Damages recovered for the conversion of property exempt from attachment are not themselves exempted by statute (P. S., *c.*138, *s.*1; *Ib., c.*220, s. 2; *Ib., c.*215, s. 20), and can be reached in the hands of the judgment debtor by trustee process unless they so far partake of the nature of such property as to be exempt for that reason. Generally, the proceeds of such property are not exempt from attachment. *Morse*v. *Towns,*45 N. H. 185; *Manchester*v. *Burns,*45 N. H. 482, 488; *Wooster*v. *Page,*54 N. H. 125; *Currier*v. *Sutherland,*54 N. H. 475, 487; *Hall*v. *Johnson,*64 N. H. 481; *Brookfield*v. *Sawyer,*68 N. H. 406. This case is no exception, for ho good reason can be given why one rule should be applied to damages recovered for the conversion by third parties of property exempt from attachment, and another rule to damages recovered upon a policy of insurance covering such property. *Wooster*v. *Page, supra.*

*3Tlie reason why the plaintiff in the original action against Robinson cannot take the proceeds of this judgment to satisfy his debt, is that no one will be allowed to profit by his own wrong and do by indirection that which he could not do in a direct proceeding, .and not because the judgment so far partakes of the nature of the property as to be itself exempt from attachment.

*Exception overruled.*

Peas lee, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>   THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATIO
           FROM THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND
           STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRE
           REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                  558,809
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                           880,090
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      8,979,768
<PP&E>                                  250,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        8,979,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 1,960,667
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                             24,835,346
<OTHER-SE>                                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          8,979,768
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        568,261
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      8,424,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       53,463
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (7,909,802)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                         (7,909,802)
<EPS-BASIC>                            ($1.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            ($1.00)


</TABLE>
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1010

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a hydroelectric

project in the State of North Carolina.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 11, 2001

Mr. HELMS (for himself and Mr. THURMOND) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction

of a hydroelectric project in the State of North Carolina.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY

4 REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period

6 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16

7 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal En8 ergy Regulatory Commission project number 11437, the

9 Commission may, at the request of the licensee for the

10 project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with
2

•S 1010 IS

1 the requirements of that section and the Commission’s

2 procedures under that section, extend the time period dur3 ing which the licensee is required to commence the con4 struction of the project for 3 consecutive 2-year periods.

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) takes effect

6 on the date of the expiration of the extension issued by

7 the Commission before the date of the enactment of this

8 Act under section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C.

9 806).

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*The Brooklyn Cooperage Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.

*People*v. *Brooklyn Cooperage Co.,*147 App. Div. 267, affirmed.

(Argued February 26, 1912;

decided March 19, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 24, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to obtain possession of a certain tract of forest land and to restrain the defendant from cutting or removing timber therefrom.

*D-Cady Herrick*and *James M. Beck*for appellant.

*Thomas Carmody, Attorney-General (John G.*Agar, *James F. Tracey*and *J. A. Kellogg*of counsel), for respondent.

*Edward W. Hatch*and *Mynderse Van Cleef*for Cornell University, defendant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of our former decision in this case (187 N. Y. 142).

Concur: Gray, Haight, Werner and Chase, JJ. Willard Bartlett, J., votes for modification in accordance with the dissenting opinion of Kellogg, J., below. Dissenting: Cullen, Oh. J., and Collin, J.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.28 MB)
 
 Kandahar CAOC Train 2017 Assist Advise Air Force Central Command Public Affairs TAAC-AIR Forward Operating Base Oqab UH-60 A airfield Afghan AIir Force U.S. Air Force training AFCENT Resolute Support NATO airman AIR FORCE Afghanistan deployment
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Exhibit 32

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Gevity HR, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers
of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                         |  |                                 
|------------------------ |  | --------------------------------
|Dated:  November 9, 2004 |  | /s/ ERIK VONK                   
|                         |  | Erik VonkChief Executive Officer
|                         |  |                                 

|                         |  |                                          
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------
|Dated:  November 9, 2004 |  | /s/ PETER C. GRABOWSKI                   
|                         |  | Peter C. GrabowskiChief Financial Officer
|                         |  |
Page 1 of 2

REC I FYjQ-10

ern 3

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS
~ BRANCH As of: September 03, 2010
Received: August 12, 2010
PUBLIC ae
SUBMISSION Eoranrate Dues auyust 26, 2020

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Refating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0710
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Robert D Green
Address:
10605 Copperfield Pi
Midlothian, VA, 23113
Email: rgreen@activechiropractic.com
Phone: 804-698-0820
Fax: 804-560-9360
Organization: Active Chiropractic Inc.

General Comment

August 12, 2010

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status
as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Below are my comments regarding the Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health
Insurance Coverage Relating to Status as a Grandfathered Health Pian Under the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA).

I believe that every effort should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by
PPACA, especially as of January 1, 2014 when most of the reform components (Insurance
Exchanges, Subsidies, Tax Credits, etc.) come into play.

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 9/3/2010


Page 2 of 2

The average consumer has a broad definition of “benefits.” Consumers view their health plan
beyond the covered benefits, cost sharing, and the contribution levels associated with the plan.
It is my opinion that the Rule may still result in some confusion to the marketplace in its
application. For example, if an employer raised the copayment level beyond the maximum in one
area (i.e. outpatient services) but retained the copayment level for primary care doctor visits,
does that mean a loss of grandfather status? Clarity will be critical both for the employer and the
employee.

Even by the most optimistic estimates, a substantial portion of the employee population will
remain outside the PPACA as of January 2014 based on the current rules, While I understand the
difficulty involved in making change, creating another large sub-population of excluded
individuals will only add to costs, increase confusion, and mitigate the potential impact of the
legislation.

The Rule needs to be clear, reasonable, and with no ambiguities involved in determining whether
a group health plan is “in or out.” The decisions the federal government makes today will

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 9/3/2010
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of United Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James W. Everson,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ James W. Everson
-------------------------------------
James W. Everson, President and Chief
Executive Officer

March 29, 2004