alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1 to Form 10-QSB

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Cecil a. Brooks does hereby  certify that the  Quarterly  Report of  Cornerstone
Ministries  Investments,  Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the six months  ended June 30,
2003 (the  "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 13, 2003.
/s/ Cecil A. Brooks, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

John T.  Ottinger,  does hereby  certify that the Annual  Report of  Cornerstone
Ministries  Investments,  Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the six months  ended June 30,
2003 (the  "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 13, 2003.

/s/ John T. Ottinger, Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.12

                        AMENDMENT OF EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT


THIS AGREEMENT is made this 5th day of December, 2003

BETWEEN:          CONSOLIDATED WATER CO. LTD., a Cayman Islands company having
                  its registered office at Trafalgar Place, West Bay Road, P.O.
                  Box 1114 GT, Grand Cayman, BWI ("the Company")

AND:              Peter D. Ribbins of P.O. Box 1114GT, Grand Cayman, BWI ("the
                  Director of Public Relations")

WHEREAS:

         A.       The Company and the Director of Public Relations entered into
                  an employment contract dated the 30th of September 2003("the
                  Employment Contract")

         B.       The parties are now desirous of amending the same, in
                  accordance with the terms of this Agreement.

NOW IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants contained herein the parties agreed
that the Employment Contract shall be amended and/or rectified as follows:

                  By adding the following paragraph as the second paragraph of
                  Clause 3; "For the financial year 2003 only, the Director of
                  Public Relations shall be granted an option to purchase for
                  cash payable in full upon the exercise of the option, a number
                  of Ordinary Shares which equals the number of US$ which
                  represents 5/6 x 1% of the net profit of the Company for the
                  2003 financial year at the closing market price of the
                  Company's Ordinary Shares on December 31, 2003. The options
                  may be exercised at any time after they are granted and before
                  the close of business on the day before the third anniversary
                  of the Auditor's Report on the financial statements for the
                  2003 financial year."

THE PARTIES HERETO have set their hands and seals the day and date first above
written.



<PAGE>



SIGNED AND SEALED in the presence of:)     CONSOLIDATED WATER CO. LTD.
                                     )
                                     )     /s/ Frederick McTaggart
                                     )     -------------------------------------
                                     )
/s/ Brent Santha                     )     Frederick McTaggart
-----------------------------------  )     -------------------------------
witness
Brent Santha

SIGNED AND SEALED in the presence of:)
                                     )
                                     )
                                     )
                                     )
/s/ Brent Santha                     )     /s/ Peter Ribbins
-----------------------------------  )     -------------------------------------
witness                                    Peter D Ribbins
Brent Santha
8-10-10 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department ofHealth and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO-999I-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer I Wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final ru1e regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-2010­

0010-0001). -- . -,,.--- ­

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation ofthe·se 

regulations. 

.
. 


. ..
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000022198
<NAME> COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,919,217
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     73,088
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         261,369
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        74,647
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 353,369
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,681,690
<COMMON>                                        41,026
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      572,492
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            186,441
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 799,959
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           25,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           959,786
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  52,500
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     35,335
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 7,027
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 802,083
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,681,690
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,187,745
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            76,237
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     899,297
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     975,534
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        212,211
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              (1,343)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 210,868
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        77,824
<NET-INCOME>                                   133,044
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      2,131
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  130,913
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        82,644
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       47,323
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         216,547
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1> All common stock owned by parent company; no EPS required.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### James Pascoshell, Appellant, v. Twenty-third Street Railway Company, Respondent.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to abide event. Opinions by Brady, J., and Davis, P. J.
From: Blake Liang

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA

Subject: Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to

Date: Monday, May 24, 2010 3:09:46 AM

This interim final rules don't make clear that if this coverage mandate applies to the

plans those are excepted from coverage (such as HIPAA-excepted flexible spending

accounts or HIPAA-excepted stand-alone dental or vision plans). Please clarify.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VICKY NIKHIL PATHAK,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General,

Respondent.

No. 22-1893

Agency No.

A046-546-630

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 12, 2023**

Before: WALLACE, LEE, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Vicky Nikhil Pathak, a native and citizen of India, petitions pro se for review 

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for deferral of removal

under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 18 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 22-1893

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review factual findings for substantial evidence. Conde 

Quevedo v. Barr, 947 F.3d 1238, 1241 (9th Cir. 2020). We review questions of 

law de novo. Id. We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the denial of deferral of removal under CAT 

because petitioner failed to show it is more likely than not he will be tortured by or 

with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to India. See Aden 

v. Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009); Zheng v. Holder, 644 F.3d 829, 

835-36 (9th Cir. 2011) (possibility of torture too speculative).

The record does not support Pathak’s contentions that the IJ violated due 

process by demonstrating bias, failing to consider all evidence and claims, or 

otherwise erring in the analysis, or that the BIA applied the wrong standard of 

review. See Padilla-Martinez v. Holder, 770 F.3d 825, 830 (9th Cir. 2014) (“To 

prevail on a due-process claim, a petitioner must demonstrate both a violation of 

rights and prejudice.”); see also Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 

2010) (the BIA adequately considered evidence and sufficiently announced its 

decision).

Because Pathak timely filed his reply brief, the motion to accept late filing

(Docket Entry No. 35) is denied as unnecessary. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 ~)f? 

1<£&- j I'til /2--/0 

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 


PUBLICATION &. REGULATIONS 


BRANCH 


As of: August 20, 2010 

Received: August 09, 2010 PUBLIC Status: Posted

Posted: August 20, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2c721 SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathei-ed 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0282 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: Stephanie Kunz 


Address: 


Macon, GA, 

General Comment 

08/09/2010 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 


Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 


Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status 

as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-2010­

0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of thes€: 

regulations. 

https:/Ifdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency IcomponentisubmitterInfoCoverPage?Call =... 8/20/2010
01

- 05

- 2011

Fm: Cory Tennen Air Line Pilots Association Economic & Financial Analysis Dept. 703

- 689

-4372 Cory.Tennen@alpa.org

To: Michael D. Lukacs Economist Office of Aviation Policy & Plans michael.lukacs@faa.gov Michael, Regarding your request for information regarding pilot sick costs/data, unfortunately the specific information we have is confidential. I did however notice that in the FAA NPRM analysis as well as in the information published by the ATA, an assumption of 5% of pay hours is associated with sick. In our experience, that assumption seems reasonable. Concerning airlines with fatigue provisions and whether they provide compensation for fatigue calls, the table below shows you the information that I currently have. Please keep in mind that it is quite possible that some of these airlines have internal policies that either govern or enhance the information contained (or not contained) within their respective collective bargaining agreements.

Please let me know if I can be of further assistance Cory

# 2 FATIGUE POLICY Airline Available Paid Discipline if not accepted Atlantic Southeast (ASA) NA Colgan (CJC) NA Comair (CMR) X NO yes Commute Air (CMT) NA Compass (CPZ) X if justified by Company yes Chautauqua (CTQ) X NO unknown Go Jet (GOJ) NA Gulfstream NA Horizon (HZN) NA Mesaba (MSA) NA Pinnacle (PCL) NA Republic (REP) X ? ? SkyWest (SKW) NA Express J et (XJET) X NO unknown American (AMR) X Reserve

- no guarantee adjustment Lineholders - no credit for lost segment mgt right to review Alaska (ALA) NA Continental (CAL) X ? mgt review Delta (DAL) ? Reserve guarantee reduced ? FedEx (FDX) X eligible for make

- up mgt review Jet Blue (JBL) X yes mgt review Southwest (SWA) NA United (UAL) NA
§ 821.33 Motion to dismiss stale complaint. Where the complaint states allegations of offenses which occurred more than 6 months prior to the Administrator's advising the respondent as to reasons for proposed action under 49 U.S.C. 44709(c), the respondent may move to dismiss such allegations as stale pursuant to the following provisions: ( a ) In those cases where the complaint does not allege lack of qualification of the respondent: ( 1 ) The Administrator shall be required to show, by reply filed within 15 days after the date of service of the respondent's motion, that good cause existed for the delay in providing such advice, or that the imposition of a sanction is warranted in the public interest, notwithstanding the delay or the reasons therefor.
( 2 ) If the Administrator does not establish good cause for the delay, or for the imposition of a sanction in the public interest notwithstanding the delay, the law judge shall dismiss the stale allegations and proceed to adjudicate the remaining portion of the complaint, if any.
( b ) In those cases where the complaint alleges lack of qualification of the respondent, the law judge shall first determine whether an issue of lack of qualification would be presented if all of the allegations, stale and timely, are assumed to be true. If so, the law judge shall deny the respondent's motion. If not, the law judge shall proceed as in paragraph (a) of this section.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          88,633
<SECURITIES>                                    13,165
<RECEIVABLES>                                   81,268
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,742
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               184,229
<PP&E>                                          12,479
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,101
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 211,601
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,816
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,936
<OTHER-SE>                                     179,596
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   211,601
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               334,729
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  224,123
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                71,704
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,280
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 40,182
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,538
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,644
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,644
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.84
        

</TABLE>
#### § 625.3 Applicability.

This part applies to all recipients and subrecipients of Federal financial assistance under 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 that own, operate, or manage capital assets used for providing public transportation.
From: Darin H [mailto:dhaus5650@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 10:30 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Say no to stealing my 401k

You guys screw up Social Security and want to steal my 401k and treat it like SS? No 

thanks. I'd rather keep my money instead of being forced to buy annuities.
IV 

House Calendar No. 237

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 605

[Report No. 107–780] 

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 

bill (S. 1214) to amend the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, to establish 

a program to ensure greater security for United States seaports, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 13, 2002

Mr. DIAZ-BALART, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed 

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to 

accompany the bill (S. 1214) to amend the Merchant 

Marine Act, 1936, to establish a program to ensure 

greater security for United States seaports, and for other 

purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (S. 1214) to amend the Merchant Marine 

4 Act, 1936, to establish a program to ensure greater secu-
2

HRES 605 RH 

1 rity for United States seaports, and for other purposes. 

2 All points of order against the conference report and 

3 against its consideration are waived. The conference re4 port shall be considered as read. 

House Calendar No. 237

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 605

[Report No. 107–780] 

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the bill (S. 1214) to amend 

the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, to establish a program to ensure greater security for United States seaports, and for other purposes. 

NOVEMBER 13, 2002

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
1210-AB32-2-1473.html[7/26/2015 5:50:02 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwg-wlgq

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1969

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: william sadler

General Comment

my retirement money/funds are my business and no one elses the government needs to keep their nose out of my

 retirement
# Az Európai Unió C 153/2004

| | ISSN 1725-518X |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | C 153 |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Tájékoztatások és közlemények | 47. évfolyam2004. június 10. |

ISSN 1725-518X

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

C 153

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Tájékoztatások és közlemények

47. évfolyam2004. június 10.

---

| Közleményszám | Tartalom | Oldal |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Információ |
| | Bizottság |
| 2004/C 153/1 | Euro átváltási árfolyamok | 1 |

Közleményszám

Tartalom

Oldal

I   Információ

Bizottság

2004/C 153/1

Euro átváltási árfolyamok

1

| HU | |
| --- | --- |

HU

---

I Információ

Bizottság

| 10.6.2004 | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | C 153/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2004

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

C 153/1

---

Euro átváltási árfolyamok (1)

2004. június 9.

(2004/C 153/01)

1 euro=

| | Pénznem | Átváltási árfolyam |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | USA dollár | 1,2157 |
| JPY | Japán yen | 132,57 |
| DKK | Dán korona | 7,4393 |
| GBP | Angol font | 0,66460 |
| SEK | Svéd korona | 9,0925 |
| CHF | Svájci frank | 1,5197 |
| ISK | Izlandi korona | 87,12 |
| NOK | Norvég korona | 8,1830 |
| BGN | Bulgár leva | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Ciprusi font | 0,58300 |
| CZK | Cseh korona | 31,335 |
| EEK | Észt korona | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Magyar Forint | 251,98 |
| LTL | Litván litász/lita | 3,4529 |
| LVL | Lett lats | 0,6568 |
| MTL | Máltai líra | 0,4255 |
| PLN | Lengyel zloty | 4,6069 |
| ROL | Román lej | 40 855 |
| SIT | Szlovén tolar | 239,1400 |
| SKK | Szlovák korona | 39,955 |
| TRL | Török líra | 1 804 336 |
| AUD | Ausztrál dollár | 1,7442 |
| CAD | Kanadai dollár | 1,6391 |
| HKD | Hong Kong-i dollár | 9,4773 |
| NZD | Új-zélandi dollár | 1,9457 |
| SGD | Szingapúri dollár | 2,0738 |
| KRW | Dél-Koreai won | 1 403,10 |
| ZAR | Dél-Afrikai rand | 8,0714 |

Pénznem

Átváltási árfolyam

USD

USA dollár

1,2157

JPY

Japán yen

132,57

DKK

Dán korona

7,4393

GBP

Angol font

0,66460

SEK

Svéd korona

9,0925

CHF

Svájci frank

1,5197

ISK

Izlandi korona

87,12

NOK

Norvég korona

8,1830

BGN

Bulgár leva

1,9558

CYP

Ciprusi font

0,58300

CZK

Cseh korona

31,335

EEK

Észt korona

15,6466

HUF

Magyar Forint

251,98

LTL

Litván litász/lita

3,4529

LVL

Lett lats

0,6568

MTL

Máltai líra

0,4255

PLN

Lengyel zloty

4,6069

ROL

Román lej

40 855

SIT

Szlovén tolar

239,1400

SKK

Szlovák korona

39,955

TRL

Török líra

1 804 336

AUD

Ausztrál dollár

1,7442

CAD

Kanadai dollár

1,6391

HKD

Hong Kong-i dollár

9,4773

NZD

Új-zélandi dollár

1,9457

SGD

Szingapúri dollár

2,0738

KRW

Dél-Koreai won

1 403,10

ZAR

Dél-Afrikai rand

8,0714

---

(1)

Forrás: Az Európai Központi Bank (ECB) átváltási árfolyama.

---