alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CJTF-OIR strikes Daesh in Wadi Ashai

/ Published April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019Release # 20190425-02FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**SOUTHWEST ASIA –**Combined Joint Task Force – Operation Inherent Resolve supported Iraqi Security Forces against Daesh targets in Wadi Ashai, April 24, 2019, disrupting their ability to regroup and reorganize.

Since the fall of Daesh’s so-called caliphate in March 2019, remnant Daesh fighters have been attempting to move munitions, equipment, and personnel into Iraq in an effort to set conditions for their resurgence.  The recent airstrikes in Wadi Ashai were conducted in support of Iraq’s own elite Counter-Terrorism Service and designed to deny Daesh’s capacity to conduct terrorist operations.

“Although the territory once held by the so-called caliphate is fully liberated, Daesh fighters still exhibit their intention to exert influence and stage a comeback,” said Maj. Gen. Chad Franks, deputy commander-operations and intelligence for CJTF-OIR. “These airstrikes have demonstrated the Coalition’s continued resolve to work with our Iraqi partners to strike Daesh wherever we find them as we continue to eliminate Daesh’s violent extremist ideology.”

The 74 nations and five international organizations that constitute the Global Coalition operating at the invitation of the Government of Iraq in support of Iraqi Security Forces in the regional pursuit of an enduring defeat of Daesh.

#DefeatDaesh
#### FELIX MAZZARELLI, PROSECUTOR, v. CITY OF ELIZABETH, RESPONDENT.

Submitted October 14, 1932

Decided March 3, 1933.

Before Justices Bodine and Donges.

*151For the prosecutor, *Edward Nugent.*

For the respondent, *Walter H. Flaherty (Frank J.*Burns).

Per Curiam.

The writ brings up an ordinance of the city of Elizabeth making it unlawful to keep open on Sunday a butcher shop, or any similar place of business. The ordinance, by express provision, does not apply to duly licensed poultry markets.

The ordinance simply adds an additional penalty for local infringement, and this, it has been held, is a legal exercise of the charter police power, and is therefore constitutional. The case presents a substantial repetition of the facts contained in *Sherman*v. *Paterson,*82 *N. J. L.*345; 82 *Atl. Rep.*889, and is therefore controlled by it. That adjudication has since been followed in *Schumacher*v. *Little Falls,*92 *N. J. L.*106; 108 *Atl. Rep.*113, and the case before us may therefore be determined upon the doctrine of *stare decisis.*See, also, *Cooley Const. Lim.*199; *Schachter*v. *Hauenstein,*92 *N. J. L.*104; 105 *Atl. Rep.*13.

“Where, as here, the subject-matter of the ordinance is within the police power of the city and the ordinance is adopted by the proper legislative body of the city, the presumption is (until the contrary be shown) that the ordinance is reasonable. The question ol reasonableness is a question of fact, and the burden of proof is upon the prosecutor who attacks the ordinance to show its unreasonableness. The court should not interfere unless it is shown that the ordinance, either upon the face of its provisions or by reason of its operation in the circumstances under which it is to take effect, is unreasonable or oppressive. *Falco*v. *Atlantic City,*99 *N. J. L.*19; 122 *Atl. Rep.*610; *North Jersey Street Railway Co.*v. *Jersey City,*75 *N. J. L.*349. Here, there is no such showing Under this head the sole contention is that upon the face of the provision it appears to be unreasonable. But we think that is not so.” *Wagman*v. *Trenton,*102 *N. J. L.*492; 134 *Atl. Rep.*115.

There is nothing in the point that the ordinance is unconstitutional ; nor is it apparent in what manner the ordinance *152exceeds the powers delegated to the city. The case of *Frederick Fuller Kislingbury et al.*v. *The Treasurer of the City of Plainfield,*10 *N. J. Mis. R.*798; 160 *Atl. Rep.*654, is inapplicable.

The writ will be dismissed.
----

----

|                                      |                                                                                       |                                     |
|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                                      | **SOUTH                JERSEY GAS COMPANY**                                                |
|                                 |                                                                                  |                                |
| Date:                 August 9, 2005 | By:                                                                              | /s/ Edward                J. Graham |
|                                      | Edward J. Graham                                                                           |
|                                      |  Chairman, President                & Chief Executive                Officer |
Second Addendum to Lease Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.7 
  
 SECOND ADDENDUM TO LEASE AGREEMENT 
 W. DAVID HILL AND 
 EASTON BANK & TRUST 
  
 Addendum to be attached to and made a permanent part of the Agreement of Lease dated July 1,
1993 and all following addendum by and between, EASTON BANK & TRUST, Landlord, and, W. DAVID HILL, Tenant, regarding 501 Idlewild Avenue, Easton, Maryland, 21601 subject to the following: 
  
 1. The term of the lease shall be from July 1, 2003 until June 30, 2008.

  
 All other terms and conditions of said Agreement of Lease shall remain the
same. 
  

					
	 WITNESSES:
	 	 	 	 
			
	 /s/ Rose K. Kleckner

	 	 	 	 /s/ Pamela A. Mussenden


	 	 	 	 	 EASTON BANK & TRUST by

	 	 	 	 	 Pamela Mussenden, Landlord

	 	 	 	 	 Date of
Execution:                         6-30-2003


			
	 WITNESSES:
	 	 	 	 
			
	 /s/ Sheila Wainwright

	 	 	 	 /s/ W. David Hill


	 	 	 	 	 W. DAVID HILL, Tenant

	 	 	 	 	 Date of
Execution:                        6-30-2003
Termination of Executive Compensation Arrangement



 Exhibit 10.10 
  
 Termination of Executive Compensation Arrangement 
  
 As described in Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended July 28, 2002, the Company
maintained an arrangement by which variable universal life insurance policies and/or annuities were purchased for executives selected by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, including some named executive officers. This arrangement
was terminated as of December 31, 2003 and no further employer contributions will be made under the arrangement. All amounts contributed by the Company were vested and all Company connections to the insurance products were severed.
National Office  �  44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2080  �  San Francisco, California  �  94104  �  TEL  415.296.7629  �  FAX  415.677.9445 

Washington DC Office  �  1090 Vermont Avenue NW, Suite 500  �  Washington DC � 20005  �  TEL  202.898.2880  �  FAX  866.593.7521 

email: nelahq@nelahq.org  �  www.nela.org 

February 9, 2011 

Employee Benefits Security Administration  

Attn: Fiduciary Definition Hearing 

Room N-5655 

U.S. Department of Labor  

200 Constitution Avenue, NW.  

Washington, DC 20210 

I am writing on behalf of the National Employment Lawyers Association (NELA) to request the opportunity 

to testify at the Fiduciary Definition Hearing to be held on March 1, and if necessary, on March 2, 2011.  

NELA previously submitted joint comments with the Pension Rights Center on the proposed regulations 

defining the term "fiduciary."  Testimony would be presented by Marc I. Machiz on NELA’s behalf.   

The following is an outline of NELA's proposed testmony: 

1. The existing regulations and interpretations are an impediment to effective private enforcement.  

2. The proposed regulations properly treat valuations of employer stock as investment advice. 

3. The regulations should not require an agreement to provide individualized advice to plan 

fiduciaries—only that the advice should be individualized.  The meaning of “individualized” should 

be     clarified in the proposed regulations. 

4. It is important that the proposed regulations make clear that they apply to advice to plan fiduciaries, 

including fiduciaries of pooled vehicles, advice with regard to selection of managers, and advice 

paid for by third parties, e.g. through commissions.  The preamble to the final regulation should 

make it clear that these positions are existing interpretations of the current regulations. 

If you have any questions about this request, please contact me by phone at (415) 296-7629 or email at 

rhamburg@nelahq.org or Marc Machiz by phone at (202) 408-4600 or email at 

MMachiz@cohenmilstein.com.  

Thank you for your consideration. 

Sincerely, 

 Rebecca M. Hamburg 

Program Director
-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/15/2010 09:31PM -----
To: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 
From: "Jim McDonald" <jmcdonald@miratechcorp.com> 
Date: 02/15/2010 01:50PM 
Subject: RE: your msg 
 
Melanie, 
Thanks for your call last week. 
Please find the attached letter that hopefully reviews our conversation. 
 
Also- if you get a chance can you send me the contact information of the 
gentleman in DC we had on the conference call when we met in RTP. 
I am in DC this week and was hoping to catch up with him. 
 
Thanks again, 
 
Jim 
  
Jim McDonald, East Coast Sales Manager, MIRATECH Corporation 
Primary: 918.629.4754 (Cell), Alternate: 918.622.7077 Opt 2 (Inside 
Sales) 420 South 145th East Avenue, Tulsa, OK 74108 
  
Emissions Solutions for industrial engines: jmcdonald@miratechcorp.com 
or www.miratechcorp.com 
Fax: 918.622.3928,  
  
-----Original Message----- 
From: King.Melanie@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:King.Melanie@epamail.epa.gov] 
 
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 12:10 PM 
To: Jim McDonald 
Subject: your msg 
 
 
That would be great if you wouldn't mind sending me an email regarding 
the issue we discussed on the phone last week - I would really 
appreciate it. 
 
Melanie King 
Energy Strategies Group 
Sector Policies and Programs Division 
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 
 
Mail Code D243-01 
RTP, NC  27711 
 
Phone:  (919) 541-2469 
Fax:       (919) 541-5450 
king.melanie@epa.gov
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-30103

Summary Calendar

BETTY COLAR,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WINN-DIXIE MONTGOMERY, INCORPORATED,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:09-CV-755

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

This is a common slip-and-fall diversity claim regarding an accident at a

grocery store. The district court entered summary judgment for the store.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 15, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-30103 Document: 00511509117 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/15/2011
No. 11-30103

We have reviewed the briefs and pertinent portions of the record and have

consulted the applicable law. There is no error. The district court properly concluded as follows: “Plaintiff has put forth no evidence that Winn Dixie had actual or constructive notice of the substance on the floor prior to plaintiff’s fall. Similarly, plaintiff has not established that Winn Dixie failed to exercise reasonable

care.”

The summary judgment is AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons set

forth by the district court in its Ruling dated January 26, 2011.

2

Case: 11-30103 Document: 00511509117 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/15/2011
# Euroopa Liidu C 152/9. j

| | ISSN 1725-5171 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 152 |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 47. köide9. juuni 2004 |

ISSN 1725-5171

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 152

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

47. köide9. juuni 2004

---

| Teatis nr | Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Teave |
| | Komisjon |
| 2004/C 152/1 | Euro vahetuskurss | 1 |

Teatis nr

Sisukord

Lehekülg

I   Teave

Komisjon

2004/C 152/1

Euro vahetuskurss

1

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

I Teave

Komisjon

| 9.6.2004 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | C 152/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2004

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

C 152/1

---

Euro vahetuskurss (1)

8. juuni 2004

(2004/C 152/01)

1 euro=

| | Valuuta | Kurss |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | USA dollar | 1,2294 |
| JPY | Jaapani jeen | 135,08 |
| DKK | Taani kroon | 7,4349 |
| GBP | Inglise nael | 0,66840 |
| SEK | Rootsi kroon | 9,1040 |
| CHF | Šveitsi frank | 1,5229 |
| ISK | Islandi kroon | 87,36 |
| NOK | Norra kroon | 8,1885 |
| BGN | Bulgaaria lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Küprose nael | 0,58300 |
| CZK | Tšehhi kroon | 31,243 |
| EEK | Eesti kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Ungari forint | 251,15 |
| LTL | Leedu litt | 3,4527 |
| LVL | Läti latt | 0,6623 |
| MTL | Malta liir | 0,4263 |
| PLN | Poola zlott | 4,5957 |
| ROL | Rumeenia leu | 40 758 |
| SIT | Sloveenia talaar | 239,1500 |
| SKK | Slovakkia kroon | 39,870 |
| TRL | Türgi liir | 1 811 841 |
| AUD | Austraalia dollar | 1,7507 |
| CAD | Kanada dollar | 1,6520 |
| HKD | Hong Kongi dollar | 9,5838 |
| NZD | Uus-Meremaa dollar | 1,9568 |
| SGD | Singapuri dollar | 2,0990 |
| KRW | Korea won | 1 423,46 |
| ZAR | Lõuna- Aafrika rand | 8,0262 |

Valuuta

Kurss

USD

USA dollar

1,2294

JPY

Jaapani jeen

135,08

DKK

Taani kroon

7,4349

GBP

Inglise nael

0,66840

SEK

Rootsi kroon

9,1040

CHF

Šveitsi frank

1,5229

ISK

Islandi kroon

87,36

NOK

Norra kroon

8,1885

BGN

Bulgaaria lev

1,9558

CYP

Küprose nael

0,58300

CZK

Tšehhi kroon

31,243

EEK

Eesti kroon

15,6466

HUF

Ungari forint

251,15

LTL

Leedu litt

3,4527

LVL

Läti latt

0,6623

MTL

Malta liir

0,4263

PLN

Poola zlott

4,5957

ROL

Rumeenia leu

40 758

SIT

Sloveenia talaar

239,1500

SKK

Slovakkia kroon

39,870

TRL

Türgi liir

1 811 841

AUD

Austraalia dollar

1,7507

CAD

Kanada dollar

1,6520

HKD

Hong Kongi dollar

9,5838

NZD

Uus-Meremaa dollar

1,9568

SGD

Singapuri dollar

2,0990

KRW

Korea won

1 423,46

ZAR

Lõuna- Aafrika rand

8,0262

---

(1)

Allikas: EKP avaldatud viitekurss.

---
From: Ahmad Hassan [mailto:hassan776@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 9:21 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

To Whom it May Concern: 

 

 

The only thing the government may properly do with any private retirement plan 

(401(k) or otherwise) would be to keep its HANDS OFF!!! This is the only policy 

consistent with the principle of individual rights, and specifically the individual's right 

to property. Retirement plans (as a result of working in the private sector) are a 

product of an individual's hard work, and belong to him or her, not to any collective 

or to the government. For the government to legally confiscate or control these--

regardless of its *intent*--is a massive injustice to the individuals to who were 

foresighted enough to work to save for these plans. (Most of are also aware just how 

frugal the government is being with money and how well it is balancing its budget--it 

is beyond fantasizing to believe that it would do a good job after seizing private 

retirement plans.) 

 

Violating individual rights and specifically private property rights, whether legally or 

illegally, is not something the federal government seems to lose much sleep over 

these days. It would be really nice if it did something refreshing and not make the 

power-grab which would be legally taking control of private retirement plans. The 

last thing we need is another government program like social security, which *IN 

EFFECT* forces an individual to save for himself (and does so poorly), as if the 

government is to be a paternal state who owns the citizen's life and a portion of his 

earnings and is charged with providing for his "security." 

 

The only fundamental need of a government is for the protection of the fundamental 

individual rights to life, liberty, and property. This--not legally seizing or taking 

ownership of more private property--is what you owe us. 

 

 

Sincerely, 

Ahmad Hassan
Merrimack, )

Jan. 3, 1911.

#### Bates Street Shirt Co. *v.*Place.

Assumpsit, for goods sold and delivered. Trial by the court *{Stone,*J.) and verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted to the denial of his motion for a nonsuit. After the decease of the justice who presided at the trial, the case was transferred from the April term, 1910, of the superior court by *Wallace,*C. J., on a statement of facts prepared by counsel in the case.

*Dudley & Lowe {Mr. Lowe*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Remick & Hollis {Alexander Murchie*orally), for the defendant.

Peaslee, J.

The controversy concerns the acceptance of a quantity of shirts ordered by the defendant from the plaintiff’s *570agent. It is admitted that the defendant sold nineteen of the shirts and is liable therefor. From this it follows that there was no error in denying the motion for a nonsuit.

But the case has been argued upon both sides on the theory that it presented some question touching the verdict as to the balance of the goods. If an exception was taken which raises such an issue, it does not appear in the record as made up by counsel. If it did so appear, it would then be necessary, if the issue was on a nonsuit as to these items, to report the substance of the evidence. The statement of such facts as counsel have been able to agree upon does not bring before this court the evidence upon which the verdict was found.

It is stated in the transferred case that the sickness of Judge *Stone*prevented his drawing a case. If this means that it was understood that .findings of fact and rulings thereon were to be filed (P. S., *c.*204, s. 10), the defendant may be entitled to a new trial on the ground of accident or misfortune. Whether he should be granted such relief for these or other reasons, whether his exceptions should be restated without a new trial, and whether the transcript of the evidence should now be procured (if procurable), are matters to be determined in the superior court. Upon the case as it stands, the plaintiff is entitled to judgment on the verdict; but as it seems probable that justice may require further proceedings in the superior court, the order is

*Case discharged.*

All concurred.
<PAGE>   1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
CT Communications, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 33-59641, 33-59643, and 33-59645) on Form S-8 of CT Communications, Inc.
of our report dated February 23, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of CT Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and
1999, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income,
stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2000, and related schedule, which report is included
in the December 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of CT Communications, Inc.


                                                /s/ KPMG LLP


Charlotte, North Carolina
March 26, 2001
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.3 MB)
 
 Soldiers President George H.W. Bush Gulf War
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.85 MB)
 
 camp buehring maneuver Greywolf 7th Cavalry Regiment 1st cavalry division 3rd armored brigade combat team 3rd abct operation Spartan shield 1st Cav. Div 8th Cavalry Regiment 3-8 CAV M1A2 Abrams Main Battle Tank M2A3 Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle 12th Cavalry Regiment 1-12 CAV 2-7 CAV sustained readiness company situational training exercise CO STX Udairi Range Complex 3rd Battalion 1st Battalion 2nd Battalion OSS Kuwait
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil