alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CENTCOM statement on rifle scopes
 By None  , U.S. Central Command
  `MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. (Jan. 21, 2010) – Gen. David Petraeus, U.S. Central Command commander, stated today that he was very concerned to learn that rifle scopes being used by some troopers deployed within the CENTCOM area have coded numbers referencing Bible verses on them, in addition to the normal markings on the scopes.    “The codes on the scopes are contrary to U.S. Central Command guidance," General Petraeus noted, adding that CENTCOM's strategy emphasizes that cultural and religious sensitivities are important considerations in the conduct of military operations.     “Our mission is to protect the population we’re serving and establish conditions for security, stability, and development, and we strive to do that while remaining sensitive to the cultural and religious norms of the populace we are supporting,” Petraeus continued.  “We deeply respect the cultures of the host nations and our coalition partners in the Central Command Area of Responsibility.”     The codes were inserted by the private company that manufactures the scopes.  The Department of Defense and U.S. Central Command only became aware of these codes in the past several days.    The scopes, manufactured by Trijicon, a Michigan-based company, were purchased in 2005 for the United States Marine Corps and Army under an urgent operational need request from battlefield commanders in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Trijicon has said the unique coded numbers are used as part of the company’s internal tracking system; however, it announced today that it will stop putting the Biblical references on the rifle scopes and will provide equipment to the Department of Defense to remove the references on some scopes already issued to the military.`
June 27: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL Terrorists in Syria and Iraq
 By CJTF - Operation Inherent Resolve News Release
  June 27, 2015 Release # 20150627 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **S****OUTHWEST ASIA, June 27, 2015 –**
 U.S. and coalition military forces have continued to attack Islamic 
State of Iraq and the Levant terrorists in Syria and Iraq, Combined 
Joint Task Force Operation Inherent Resolve officials reported today. Officials
 reported details of the latest strikes, which took place between 8 a.m.
 yesterday and 8 a.m. today, local time, noting that assessments of 
results are based on initial reports. **Syria** Attack, bomber, fighter and remotely piloted aircraft conducted 14 airstrikes in Syria: --
 Near Hasakah, two airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit, destroying 
two ISIL fighting positions, an ISIL tank and an ISIL weapons cache. -- Near Aleppo, an airstrike struck an ISIL assembly area. --
 Near Raqqah, five airstrikes struck three ISIL tactical units, 
destroying five ISIL excavators, an ISIL vehicle and an ISIL remotely 
piloted aircraft. -- Near Kobani, four airstrikes struck three 
ISIL tactical units, destroying two ISIL boats, an ISIL fighting 
position and an ISIL vehicle. -- Near Tal Abyad, two airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit, destroying an ISIL vehicle. **Iraq** Attack, fighter and remotely piloted aircraft conducted seven airstrikes in Iraq, approved by the Iraqi Ministry of Defense: -- Near Baghdadi, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL excavator. --
 Near Huwayjah, two airstrikes struck two ISIL tactical units, 
destroying two ISIL buildings, an ISIL cache, an ISIL heavy machine gun 
and an ISIL vehicle. -- Near Beiji, an airstrike struck an ISIL vehicle. -- Near Habbaniyah, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL mortar tube. --
 Near Tal Afar, two airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and an ISIL 
heavy machine gun firing position, destroying an ISIL building. **Part of Operation Inherent Resolve** The
 strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the 
operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose
 to Iraq, Syria, the region, and the wider international community. The 
destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the 
terrorist group's ability to project terror and conduct operations, 
officials said. Coalition nations conducting airstrikes in Iraq 
include the United States, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, 
Jordan, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Coalition nations 
conducting airstrikes in Syria include the United States, Bahrain, 
Canada, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      MAR-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                      PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>          510,460
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>            886
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>              89,075
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>           101,267
<OTHER-ASSETS>                         903
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     702,591
<COMMON>                             5,848
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>          102,817
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                 68,243
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>     176,908
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               35,000
<PREFERRED>                          2,134
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>               195,523
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                  59,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>           0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>        8,876
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>              0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                         0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>     228,150
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      702,591
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>          135,082
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                12,718
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          98,553
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         111,271
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>             23,811
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                       0
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>      23,811
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>             5,021
<NET-INCOME>                        18,790
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>            773
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>       18,018
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>             4,050
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>            4,107
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>              55,082
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         7.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                         7.70
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 801

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 801 appear at 86 FR 54641, Oct. 4, 2021.

#### § 801.56 Unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(6), any personal, medical, or similar file is exempt from public disclosure if its disclosure would harm the individual concerned or would be a clearly unwarranted invasion of the person's personal privacy.
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.135 What does the MRO tell the employee at the beginning of the verification interview? ( a ) As the MRO, you must tell the employee that the laboratory has determined that the employee's test result was positive, adulterated, substituted, or invalid, as applicable. You must also tell the employee of the drugs for which his or her specimen tested positive, or the basis for the finding of adulteration or substitution.
( b ) You must explain the verification interview process to the employee and inform the employee that your decision will be based on information the employee provides in the interview.
( c ) You must explain that, if further medical evaluation is needed for the verification process, the employee must comply with your request for this evaluation and that failure to do so is equivalent of expressly declining to discuss the test result.
( d ) As the MRO, you must warn an employee who has a confirmed positive, adulterated, substituted or invalid result that you are required to provide to third parties drug test result information and medical information affecting the performance of safety-sensitive duties that the employee gives you in the verification process without the employee's consent (see § 40.327). ( 1 ) You must give this warning to the employee before obtaining any medical information as part of the verification process.
( 2 ) For purposes of this paragraph (d), medical information includes information on medications or other substances affecting the performance of safety-sensitive duties that the employee reports using or medical conditions the employee reports having.
( 3 ) For purposes of this paragraph (d), the persons to whom this information may be provided include the employer, a SAP evaluating the employee as part of the return to duty process (see § 40.293(g)), DOT, another Federal safety agency (*e.g.,* the NTSB), or any state safety agency as required by state law.
( e ) You must also advise the employee that, before informing any third party about any medication the employee is using pursuant to a legally valid prescription consistent with the Controlled Substances Act, you will allow 5 business days from the date you report the verified negative result for the employee to have the prescribing physician contact you to determine if the medication can be changed to one that does not make the employee medically unqualified or does not pose a significant safety risk. If, in your reasonable medical judgment, a medical qualification issue or a significant safety risk remains after you communicate with the employee's prescribing physician or after 5 business days, whichever is shorter, you must follow § 40.327. If, as the MRO, you receive information that eliminates the medical qualification issue or significant safety risk, you must transmit this information to any third party to whom you previously provided information under § 40.327.
[65 FR 79526, Dec. 19, 2000, as amended at 66 FR 41952, Aug. 9, 2001; 82 FR 52245, Nov. 13, 2017; 88 FR 27645, May 2, 2023]
From: Jody Dowda [mailto:jodydowda@etcmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 10:36 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Include RIN 1210-AB33

To whom it may concern

 

I'm sure you could care less but I don't want or need your help in managing my 401k. My only 

regret is that my plan doesn't include a vehicle to short the very treasuries you are trying to 

unload on me under the disguise of "income for life". I have a tip for you. Stop borrowing.

 

Jody Dowda
---------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Page I 

~,UG 1 8 2010 

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 


PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS 


BRANCH 


As of: August 18, 2010 

Received: August 09, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 18, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2c60e 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-2010-001O-0157 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: FRANK MANUEL GOMEZ, JR 

Address: 

SAYVILLE, NY, 

General Comment 

August 9, 2010 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 


Department of Health and Human Services 


Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 


Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 


Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status 

as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment I)n 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-2010­

0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these 

regulations. 

http://fdms.erul emaking.net/fdms-web-agency IcomponentisubmitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/18/2010
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 103

Referring the bill (H.R. 1258), entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief of Sarabeth

M. Davis, Robert S. Borders, Victor Maron, Irving Berke, and Adele

E. Conrad’’, to the chief judge of the United States Court of Federal

Claims for a report thereon.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 27, 2001

Mr. COX submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Referring the bill (H.R. 1258), entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief

of Sarabeth M. Davis, Robert S. Borders, Victor Maron,

Irving Berke, and Adele E. Conrad’’, to the chief judge

of the United States Court of Federal Claims for a

report thereon.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. REFERRAL.

3 Pursuant to section 1492 of title 28, United States

4 Code, the bill (H.R. 1258), entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief

5 of Sarabeth M. Davis, Robert S. Borders, Victor Maron,

6 Irving Berke, and Adele E. Conrad’’, now pending in the
2

•HRES 103 IH

1 House of Representatives, is referred to the chief judge

2 of the United States Court of Federal Claims.

3 SEC. 2. PROCEEDINGS AND REPORT.

4 Upon receipt of the bill, the chief judge shall—

5 (1) proceed under section 2509 of title 28,

6 United States Code; and

7 (2) report back to the House of Representa8 tives, at the earliest practicable date, providing—

9 (A) findings of fact and conclusions of law

10 that are sufficient to inform the Congress of the

11 nature, extent, and character of the claim for

12 the compensation referred to in the bill as a

13 legal or equitable claim against the United

14 States; and

15 (B) the amount, if any, legally or equitably

16 due from the United States to the claimants.

Æ
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the inclusion of our
report dated February 12, 2004, relating to the financial statements of Utix
Group, Inc. (formally known as Corporate Sports Incentives, Inc.) in this
Registration Statement on Form 10-SB. Our report contains an explanatory
paragraph regarding the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. It
should be noted that we have not audited any financial statements of the Company
subsequent to September 30, 2003 or performed any audit procedures subsequent to
the date of our report.

VITALE, CATURANO & COMPANY, P.C.

/s/ Vitale, Caturano & Company, P.C.

April 12, 2004
Boston, Massachusetts
# PNS Aslat seizes 5 tons of drugs to total $1 billion CTF 150-seized drugs in recent months

/ Published Feb. 8, 2018
MANAMA, Bahrain, 
Pakistan Navy Ship (PNS) Aslat (254), as part of Combined Task Force (CTF) 150, seized five tons of hashish Feb. 6, while patrolling the Arabian Sea.

Aslat detected a dhow of interest during a routine patrol of the area. The Pakistan ship requested permission from CTF 150 to conduct a flag-verification boarding. Once the dhow was determined to be without nationality, PNS Aslat was authorized to conduct a non-destructive search of the dhow. Aslat’s boarding team located the five tons of hashish, valued at over $197 million.“CTF 150 is a multinational task force working together in order to promote security and stability throughout our area of operations,” said Commander of CTF 150 Cmdre. Mal Wise, Royal Australian Navy. “The recent seizure with PNS Aslat highlights the expertise and local operational knowledge of our partner navies that is key to achieving success.”Since November, multinational assets in support of CTF 150 have seized over 16 tons of hashish and 1.5 tons of heroin, valued in excess of $1 billion. This is the sixth confiscation of drugs by CTF 150, currently under Australian leadership, with a combined Australian and Canadian staff and supported by assets from partner nations like Australia, France, New Zealand, Pakistan, the United Kingdom, and the United States.The U.S.-led Combined Maritime Forces is a Bahrain-based, global maritime partnership of nations, aligned in common purpose to conduct maritime security operations in order to provide security in the maritime environment.CTF 150 is focused on disrupting terrorist organisations and their unlawful activities by restricting freedom of manoeuvre in the maritime domain. In collaboration with regional and other partners, CTF 150 promotes maritime security by denying terrorist organisations their ability to move personnel, weapons or drugs thus obstructing their capacity to raise funds.Note: *This calculation is based on the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission Illicit Drug Data Report 2015–16 figures for Cannabis Resin (Hashish) at $50 AUD /$39 USD per gram (p215) and Heroin at $300,000 AUD / $235,000 USD per kilogram (p 216).
IV 

House Calendar No. 236

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 603

[Report No. 107–776] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 13 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 12), 2002

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered 

to be printed 

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules.

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of Wednesday, November 13, 

6 2002, providing for consideration or disposition of a joint 
2

HRES 603 RH 

1 resolution making further continuing appropriations for 

2 the fiscal year 2003. 

House Calendar No. 236

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 603

[Report No. 107–776] 

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules. 

NOVEMBER 13 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 12), 2002

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

In re: REBECCA GALLOGLY,

Petitioner

______________________

2022-129

______________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States 

Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:20-cv-00261-MCW, Senior 

Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams.

______________________

ON PETITION

______________________

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

On June 17, 2020, the United States Court of Federal 

Claims dismissed Rebecca Gallogly’s case and entered 

judgment. The Court of Federal Claims subsequently denied all post-judgment motions on May 19, 2021. On 

March 10, 2022, Dr. Gallogly filed this petition challenging 

several of the Court of Federal Claims’ rulings and requesting various relief in connection with her claims. 

The remedy of mandamus is available only in “exceptional circumstances to correct a clear abuse of discretion 

or usurpation of judicial power.” In re Calmar, Inc., 854 

F.2d 461, 464 (Fed. Cir. 1988) (citations omitted). A party 

seeking a writ of mandamus bears the burden of 

Case: 22-129 Document: 10 Page: 1 Filed: 05/12/2022
2 IN RE: GALLOGLY

demonstrating to the court that (1) there are no adequate 

alternative legal channels through which she may obtain 

that relief; (2) the petitioner has a clear and indisputable 

right to relief; and (3) the grant of mandamus is appropriate under the circumstances. See Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. 

for D.C., 542 U.S. 367, 380–81 (2004). 

Dr. Gallogly has not met those requirements here. 

“Mandamus relief is not appropriate when a petitioner fails 

to seek relief through the normal appeal process.” In re 

Fermin, 859 F. App’x 904, 905 (Fed. Cir. 2021); see also In 

re Pollitz, 206 U.S. 323, 331 (1907) (“[M]andamus cannot 

. . . be used to perform the office of an appeal . . . .”). Because Dr. Gallogly failed to raise her challenges to the decisions of the Court of Federal Claims by way of a timely 

filed direct appeal, we deny her request for mandamus.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The petition is denied, and any pending motions are 

denied as moot.

May 12, 2022

 Date

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 22-129 Document: 10 Page: 2 Filed: 05/12/2022
#### Thomas J. Hayes, as Assignee, etc., Appellant, v. Alexander V. Davidson, Sheriff, etc., Respondent.

Order from which the appeal has been taken reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements and the motion made denied. Opinion by

Dauiels, J.;

Davis, P. j., concurred; Brady, J.,dissented.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 50 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 50

    Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to Marcus Garvey.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2001

 Mr. Rangel submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to Marcus Garvey.

Whereas Marcus Mosiah Garvey was born in St. Ann's Bay, Jamaica, on August 17, 
        1887, and emigrated to the United States where he founded the Universal 
        Negro Improvement Association;
Whereas Marcus Garvey was the father of the largest African-American movement 
        for human rights and economic self-sufficiency of all time, attracting 
        millions of followers in the United States, the Caribbean, Latin 
        America, Africa, and Europe;
Whereas Marcus Garvey's philosophy inspired some of the world's great Black 
        leaders;
Whereas leading a movement for economic independence among Black Americans, 
        Marcus Garvey became the target of surveillance and harassment by United 
        States Government law enforcement agencies;
Whereas Marcus Garvey was prosecuted and convicted of mail fraud, imprisoned, 
        and later, deported to Jamaica;
Whereas the case against Marcus Garvey was politically motivated, the charges 
        unsubstantiated, and his conviction unjust;
Whereas millions of petitioners have appealed for his exoneration;
Whereas Marcus Garvey is recognized as a national hero in his native Jamaica, 
        and as a towering figure in nations around the world; and
Whereas Marcus Garvey's life and contributions to the United States should be 
        recognized and appropriate steps taken to restore his name and 
        reputation in this country: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) Marcus Garvey was innocent of the charges brought 
        against him by the United States Government;
            (2) Marcus Garvey is and should be recognized 
        internationally as a leader and thinker in the struggle for 
        human rights; and
            (3) the President should take appropriate measures to clear 
        Marcus Garvey's good name.
                                 <all>
```