alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21

McDATA Subsidiaries

|Name                                         |  | Place of Incorporation |  | Date    
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | --------
|SANavigator, Inc.                            |  | Delaware               |  | 9/7/01  
|Nishan Systems, Inc.                         |  | California             |  | 8/19/03 
|Sanera Systems, Inc.                         |  | Delaware               |  | 8/21/03 
|Condor Acquisiton, Inc.                      |  | Minnesota              |  | 1/05    
|McDATA Australia Pty Limited                 |  | Sydney, Australia      |  | 11/19/01
|McDATA Technology Systems GmbH               |  | Ottobrun, Germany      |  | 11/6/00 
|McDATA Hong Kong Limited                     |  | Hong Kong              |  | 9/12/01 
|McDATA Technology Systems Ltd                |  | Dublin, Ireland        |  | 8/11/99 
|McDATA Japan K.K.                            |  | Tokyo, Japan           |  | 6/21/00 
|McDATA Technology Systems Singapore Pte Ltd. |  | Singapore              |  | 3/24/02 



QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors 

Comarco, Inc. 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (Nos. 33-44943, 33-45096, 33-63219, 333-11749, 333-78677, and 333-42350) on Form S-8 of Comarco, Inc. of our report dated May 9, 2004, except as to Note 20, which is as of May 9, 2005, relating to theconsolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows of Comarco, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended January 31, 2004, and the related schedule, which report appears in the January 31, 2006 annual report onForm 10-K of Comarco, Inc. and subsidiaries. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Costa Mesa, California 

May 1, 2006
Exhibit 10.17  


February 10,
2004 


Stephen
A. Spearman, PhD 


Dear
Steve: 


        I
am pleased to inform you that the Board of Directors has approved a Bonus of Seventy Five Thousand Dollars ($75,000) to be paid to you for your contributions to the
spin-off of Pharmacopeia Drug Discovery. The bonus is contingent upon the successful completion of the spin-off of PDD and is also contingent upon your remaining an employee of
Pharmacopeia Drug Discovery through December 31, 2004. The bonus will be paid at that time. 


        In
addition, the Board of Directors has approved a Restricted Stock Award of Three Thousand (3,000) shares of common stock, awarded to you effective February 4, 2004. These shares
will vest in equal annual installments over three years—one-third (1/3) on the first anniversary of the grant, one-third (1/3) on the
second anniversary of the grant and one-third (1/3) on the third anniversary of the grant—provided that you remain employed by the Company. 



        Within
the next few weeks, you will be receiving the actual restricted shares agreement document from our stock plan administration group for your review and signature. 


        Thank
you for your efforts and contributions to making Pharmacopeia a success. I look forward to working with you to complete the spin-off of PDD to the shareholders. 













Very
truly yours, 



Joseph
A. Mollica, PhD
June 5, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Modification to Exemption Request under Section 

### 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 

### Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations submitted September 19, 2014 Dear Sir or Madam: Thank you for your approval of the City of Roswell Coalition's 333 Exemption No. 11265. At this time, on behalf of both the City of Roswell Coalition as the petitioner and for Strat Aero International Inc. as the sUAS operator for said petitioner, I request an amendment to our exemption to add the DJI Spreading Wings S1000 sUAS to our approved aircraft. This specific sUAS has been approved in over 40 granted 333 exemptions to date, and we will submit operating documents to 333exemptionsCaDfaa.gov to further clarify safety and operational features of this aircraft. This addition to Exemption No. 11265 will not change missions, training, and/or maintenance performed by City of Roswell Coalition representatives. Thanks again for your help with approving our request. If you have questions or concerns, please contact Mr. Jonathan Adams at 518-224-5759. Best regards,

Tanya Renae Compton Project Management-Administration Strat Aero International, Inc. On behalf of Jonathan E. Adams Executive Vice President Strat Aero International, Inc.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

DEVONA HOLLINGSWORTH
, Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERA NS AFFAIRS, Respondent

______________________

2018

- 2100

______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No s . AT

- 4324

- 17

- 0315

- I

- 2, AT

- 4324

- 18

- 0091

- I

- 1.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J OSEPH D AVID M AGRI , Merkle & Magri, PA, Tampa, FL, argued for petitioner.

K ELLY A. K RYSTYNIAK , Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by J OSEPH H. H UNT
, A LLISON K IDD

- M ILLER
, R OBERT E DWARD K IRSCHMAN
, J R

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it isO RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN
, L INN
, and W ALLACH
, Circuit Judges ).

A FFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

May 17, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Docket: HHS-OS-2010-0012 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Dependent Coverage of Children to 

Age 26, etc. 

Comment On: HHS-OS-2010-0012-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Dependent Coverage of Children to 

Age 26, etc. 

Document: HHS-OS-2010-0012-DRAFT-0007 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: Joseph Stanzak 

Organization: Center for Justice & Equality 

General Comment 

45 CFR Parts 144, 146, and 147: 

Provides for coverage for dependent children to age 26 years - maybe. However, this 

requirement appears not to apply to employer self insurred plans even though those plans are 

implemented, administered and processed by recognized health insurance companies, i.e. Cigna. 

This provides a method for companies to bypass this provision (and others) by simply purchasing 

"self insured" policies from a health insurance provider. Currently, Davita Corp - the Nations' 

largest dialysis provider, has denied employees dependent coverage claiming the provision does 

not apply to employer base self insured health coverage. 

This loophole needs to be plugged and coverage extended to all dependents to age 26 years 

regardless of the "perceived" owner of the insurance policy. If it is a health insurance policy, 

dependents should be covered. 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION 

As of: August 12, 2010 

Received: July 06, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80b13da9 

Comments Due: August 11, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/12/2010
Exhibit 23



                        CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-21095, 33-40263, 33-53952, 33-5214, 2-97766, 33-5218, 33-42696 and 333-70285
of The Coastal Corporation on Forms S-8 and Registration Statements No.
33-48435, 333-10995, 333-44527, 333-50075 and 333-58981 of The Coastal
Corporation on Forms S-3 of our report dated February 4, 1999, appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Coastal Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 1998.






DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP



Houston, Texas
March 24, 1999
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of Senesco Technologies, Inc. for the periodended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof, the undersigned, Bruce C. Galton, President and ChiefExecutive Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that:

 

(1)           The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of Senesco Technologies, Inc.

 
| Dated: May 1, 2009 | /s/ Bruce C. Galton *                 |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------|
|               | Bruce C. Galton                       |
|               | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|               | (principal executive officer)         |

 

----

*  A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to usand will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                              90
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,063
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      7,738
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             299
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               309
<LOANS>                                         22,800
<ALLOWANCE>                                        166
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,568
<DEPOSITS>                                      21,374
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                402
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,726
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  32,568
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    958
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  200
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,158
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 508
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 508
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              650
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        4
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    368
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    292
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         292
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       187
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     4.3
<LOANS-NON>                                         12
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   164
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        2
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  166
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               166
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
99–008

107TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 107–490

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE

REPORT TO ACCOMPANY S. 1372, EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

REAUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2002

JUNE 4, 2002.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

R E P O R T

[To accompany H. Res. 433]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 433, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference

report to accompany S. 1372, the Export-Import Bank Reauthorization Act of 2002, and against its consideration.

Æ
----

----

I Informácie

Komisia

----

Výmenný kurz eura (1)

10. júna 2004

(2004/C 154/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Zdroj: referen?ný výmenný kurz publikovaný ECB.

----
#### WINFIELD FINE, Sr., PROSECUTOR, v. BOROUGH OF MILLTOWN, CHARLES V. L. BOOREAM ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

Submitted January 18, 1933

Decided July 25, 1933.

Before Justices Parker, Lloyd and Heher.

For the prosecutor, *Joseph H. Fdgar.*

Por the respondents, *Fred W. De Voe.*

Per Curiam.

The prosecutor seeks to have his position as janitor of the borough hall of Milltown from which he claims to have been illegally removed, restored to him.

It seems that a janitor for the hall had been appointed and confirmed by the borough council on each succeeding' Mew Year’s day for the preceding twenty-two years. In September, 1931, Junker, the then incumbent, died and the prosecutor was on the 14th of that month appointed to succeed him. *671On January 1st, 1932, one Brindle was appointed to the position.

It is contended by the prosecutor that he held for an indefinite term, and being an exempt fireman, under the Tenure of Office acts, could not be removed.

Wo find it unnecessary to consider the legal phase of prosecutor’s term. Prom the depositions taken under stipulation of the parties we think it fairly appears that the prosecutor voluntarily surrendered the position and returned the keys to the building on the 31st of December, 1931. This presented a question of fact which was rightly determined adversely to the prosecutor and the writ is dismissed.
----

(2004/C 88 E/0156)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3462/03

by Helmuth Markov (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(21 November 2003)

Subject:   Plans for weight restrictions at the Guben-Gubinek border crossing and EU funds

The district of Spree-Neisse (in Brandenburg Land, Federal Republic of Germany) intends to restrict the total weight of vehicles crossing the border at Guben-Gubinek to 20 tons. This restriction on goods transport is to apply in one direction only — Germany to Poland — and will create a range of problems for the local economy. The Guben-Gubinek border crossing at Schlagsdorf was also set up with EU funding. On the exporting side, therefore, part of the funding invested by the EU will be practically worthless. In addition, such a unilateral restriction is contrary to the spirit of the EU funding, the intention being to promote goods transport between the accession countries and the EU.

The Commission:

Answer given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(9 January 2004)

The PHARE Programme cofinanced the border post of Gubinek, which is for goods traffic only and is located beside the border post of Gubin reserved for passenger traffic. The cofinanced work was completed in 1998.

It is true that on the German side in the direction of Poland goods traffic has been restricted on Thursdays and Fridays to heavy goods vehicles under 20 tonnes. This decision was taken because, on the German side, there is as yet no alternative route around the town so that, at the moment, all heavy goods traffic has to pass through the town. The inhabitants of the German town complained to the competent German authorities and asked for traffic restrictions to be introduced. The restrictions were the subject of an agreement between the German and Polish authorities.

Work on the alternative route on the German side has already begun and should be completed next year. The restrictions are therefore only temporary. On the Polish side, there is already an alternative route so no such problems are expected. For these reasons, the Commission does not consider that the funds invested were ill spent.

As to the actual restrictions, current Community legislation does not cover prohibitions on traffic. Taking into account the fact that the temporary restriction is a one-off occurrence and is based on sound road safety and environmental protection criteria, the Commission does not believe any action is called for.

----
#### William W. Tracy, as Executor, etc., Respondent, v. Robert B. Snowden and others, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Davis, P. J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              88
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,424
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      4,174
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             416
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               427
<LOANS>                                         24,243
<ALLOWANCE>                                        170
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,074
<DEPOSITS>                                      20,126
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                567
<LONG-TERM>                                      1,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,315
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  32,074
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,011
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  179
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,190
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 433
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 439
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              751
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        1
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 168
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    605
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    331
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         331
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       209
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     4.6
<LOANS-NON>                                         34
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   169
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  170
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               170
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Eli *W.*La Bombarde, Respondent, v. Agricultural Insurance Company of Watertown, Appellant.

Judgment reversed, new trial. *646granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Learned, P. J
---

---

Exhibit 23.3

CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement on Forms S-8, (File No. 333-61895 and File No.
333-55970) and Forms S-3,( File No. 333-140968 , File No. 333-140969 and , File No.
333-140974) of our report dated March 5, 2007 relating to the financial statements of
Carmel Container Systems Ltd., which appears in this Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2006, of Ampal  American Israel Corporation.

Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
Member of Ernst & Young Global

Haifa ,Israel
March 29, 2007



---

---
AMENDMENT TO THE
ALPHARMA INC. 1997 INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION 
AND APPRECIATION RIGHT PLAN



The Alpharma Inc. 1997 Incentive Stock Option and Appreciation Right Plan (the "Plan") is hereby amended effective as of October 1, 2006, as follows:



1.	Section 16. of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following to the end of the third paragraph thereof:

"Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that one of the above events occurs and is determined by the Committee to be an equity restructuring under FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Shareholder Based Payment, then the Committee shall make such adjustments in the nature, amount of, and price of securities subject to Benefits as are determined by the Committee to be necessary in order to prevent dilution of the Benefits."
##### 



Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: August 9, 2007
    /s/ Erik VonkErik VonkChief Executive Officer Dated: August 9, 2007
    /s/ Garry J. WelshGarry J. WelshChief Financial Officer
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.94 MB)
 
 advisor 1st Security Force Assistance Brigade 1st SFAB deployment Afghanistan Afghan National Army train assist scott jackson AP Lighting FOB Altimur
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil