alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[House Report 107-611]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     107-611

======================================================================

 
 PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE SENATE AMENDMENT TO THE BILL H.R. 
          4546, DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003

                                _______
                                

  July 25 (legislative day of July 24), 2002.--Referred to the House 
                   Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 500]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 500, by a non-record vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides that upon adoption of the rule H.R. 
4546, with the Senate amendment, shall be taken from the 
Speaker's table and is hereby agreed to with an amendment, 
consisting of the text of H.R. 4546, as passed by the House and 
the text of H.R. 4547, as passed by the House.
    The rule further provides that the House shall be 
considered to have insisted on its amendment to the Senate 
amendment and to have requested a conference thereon.

                                

```
Docket: HHS-OS-2010-0012 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Dependent Coverage of Children to 

Age 26, etc. 

Comment On: HHS-OS-2010-0012-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Dependent Coverage of Children to 

Age 26, etc. 

Document: HHS-OS-2010-0012-DRAFT-0012 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-11391 

Submitter Information 

General Comment 

Under §147.120(g), before January 1, 2014, a young adult is not eligible for coverage under his 

or her parent’s coverage in a grandfathered health plan if the child is eligible to enroll in an 

eligible employer-sponsored health plan. I am confused about what types of health plans are 

encompassed by that term. IRC 5000A(f)(2) did not provide a meaningful definition. 

My 23-year-old son has schizophrenia, but has responded well to medication. He goes to the 

community college part-time, and works at a national retail chain part-time. Since he aged out of 

our family health care coverage last year, we have covered him under COBRA. My son is eligible 

for a health care plan that his employer offers to part-time employees. This plan is very 

inexpensive and a real benefit to part-time workers without other coverage, but is completely 

inadequate for my son. It includes no prescription drug coverage (my son’s medication costs 

close to $900/month without insurance discounts), greatly restricts other benefits, and has an 

annual limit of $2,000. 

The rules on requirements for group health plans issued on June 28 allow for a waiver of the 

restriction on annual limits for some health plans, which seems to be directed at these types of 

mini-med plans. 

Eligibility for this type of low-cost, low-value health plan should render an individual ineligible for 

the young adult coverage and ask that you clarify, before January 1, that plans that do not 

provide essential health benefits and impose restrictive annual and lifetime limits do not 

disqualify a young adult from coverage under his or her parent’s insurance. 

My son’s job is important to him and contributes to his continued recovery, but he makes less 

money each month than the cost of his COBRA coverage. I would hate to tell him that he should 

quit his job because it costs us more than he makes. Coverage that only pays the first $2,000 of 

medical costs each year should not be a barrier to participating in this important new benefit. 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION 

As of: August 12, 2010 

Received: July 16, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80b1b5a6 

Comments Due: August 11, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/12/2010
Page | of 1

SEP 7 2019 REG [Pdi 2-/6

LEGAL PROCESSING DIV,
PUBLICATION & REGUL, TONS
there R A h Ji A

0 or TIONS

[As of: September 07, 2010

PUBLIC Status: Posted

Posted: September 07, 2010
SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0738
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Matt Dopps
Address:
555. Mclean Blvd.
Wichita, KS, 67203

General Comment

See attached file(s)

Attachments

IRS-2010-0010-0738.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 9/7/2010


8/12/10

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to
Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a consumer 1 wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. | specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

Matt Dopps
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BEL FUSE
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE TWELVE
MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STASTEMENTS.

</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>        1


<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      23,498,491
<SECURITIES>                                 2,981,020
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,061,440
<ALLOWANCES>                                   195,000
<INVENTORY>                                  8,411,540
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            44,337,503
<PP&E>                                      48,136,924
<DEPRECIATION>                              21,815,910
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              71,614,008
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,464,911
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       507,082
<OTHER-SE>                                  62,892,015
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                71,614,008
<SALES>                                     65,457,521
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            65,457,521
<CGS>                                       46,539,465
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               58,033,334
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,730,530
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,925,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,805,530
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 439 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 170
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 439

                          [Report No. 107-503]

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 96) 
proposing a tax limitation amendment to the Constitution of the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 11, 2002

   Mr. Sessions, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 96) 
proposing a tax limitation amendment to the Constitution of the United 
                                States.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 96) 
proposing a tax limitation amendment to the Constitution of the United 
States. The joint resolution shall be considered as read for amendment. 
The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the joint 
resolution and any amendment thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) two hours of debate equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on the Judiciary; (2) an amendment in the nature of a substitute 
printed in the Congressional Record pursuant to clause 8 of rule XVIII, 
if offered by the Minority Leader or his designee, which shall be 
considered as read and shall be separately debatable for one hour 
equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and 
(3) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

                                                 House Calendar No. 170

107th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 439

                          [Report No. 107-503]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 96) 
proposing a tax limitation amendment to the Constitution of the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 11, 2002

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
EXHIBIT 22


                             SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



                                                               Percentage
                                                               of voting
                                                               securities
                                 Incorporated                   owned by
                                   under the                    immediate
Name                               laws of       Parent          parent
----------------------------     ------------    -------------  ---------

CompuDyne Corporation *            Nevada        Registrant
SYSCO Security Systems, Inc. *     Nevada        CompuDyne Corp.   100%
CompuDyne Corp. of Maryland *      Maryland      CompuDyne Corp.   100%
Quanta Systems Corporation *       Connecticut   CompuDyne Corp.   100%
CompuDyne, Inc.**                  Delaware      CompuDyne Corp.   100%
MicroAssembly Systems, Inc.        Connecticut   CompuDyne Corp.   100%
Quanta SecurSystems, Inc.          Maryland      CompuDyne Corp.   100%



Note:

* All subsidiaries of the Registrant as of December 31, 1997, are
  included in the consolidated financial statements of the Registrant.

**  CompuDyne, Inc. filed for petition in bankruptcy on December 31,
    1991.
| 1.     | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and                         |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                |
| 2.     | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of      Registrant. |

|        |                                                                                                                |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                |
|   | Name:      Bernard Zimmerman                                                                                        |
|   | Title:      President, Chief Executive Officer            and Chief      Financial Officer |

----
**The Long-Term Effectiveness of Center High Mounted Stop Lamps in Passenger Cars and Light Trucks**

----

**TABLE OF CONTENTS**

Executive Summary
1.Introduction and Background    1.1 Evaluation of CHMSL    1.2 Results of earlier effectiveness and cost studies - passenger cars 2    1.3	Extension of CHMSL to light trucks2. The initial and long-term overall effectiveness of passenger car CHMSL    2.1	Data sources    2.2	The basic contingency table    2.3	Controlling for the vehicle age effect    2.4	Computation of the preliminary effectiveness estimates    2.5	Tests for spurious effectiveness before MY 1985 and after MY 1986    2.6	Adjusting the estimates for retrofits and other factors    2.7	Confidence bounds and statistical tests - based on State-to-State and CY-to-CY variation of the   effectiveness estimates    2.8	Confidence bounds and statistical tests - based onan eight-State, paired-comparisons estimator    2.9	Comparison with earlier analyses3.	The effectiveness of passenger car CHMSL in specific situations    3.1	Analyses of five State files: method    3.2	Analyses of five State files: results    3.3	The effect of CHMSL in fatal crashes4.	The effectiveness of CHMSL for light trucks    4.1	Analyses of six State files: method    4.2	Overall effectiveness    4.3	Effectiveness by truck type and sizeThe long-term benefits and costs of CHMSLReferencesAppendixThis document is available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161.The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear only because they are considered essential to the object of this report.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of Comarco, Inc. I, Samuel M. Inman, III, Chief Executive Officer of Comarco, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | This annual report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Comarco, Inc.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                         
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------
|Date: April 30, 2008 |  | /s/ SAMUEL M. INMAN, III
|                     |  | Samuel M. Inman, III    
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer 

A signed original copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 6:29 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN-1210-AB 39 Department of Labor

First, thank you for attempting to correct the ERISA regulations that result in a deck stacked against people with 

disabilities.

As a disabled person, I support the move towards more independence and impartiality, improved disclosure to claimants 

along with the opportunity to review and respond to new information prior to a final decision and changes to technical 

rules and notices.

These proposed changes will definitely help.

--

Abraham Joshua Heschel: "Our goal should be to live life in radical amazement . . . . get up in the 

morning and look around at the world in a way that takes nothing for granted. Everything is 

phenomenal; everything is incredible; never treat life casually. To be spiritual is to be amazed."
----

March 16, 2004

**SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD.**  Suite 505, 1111 West Georgia Street  Vancouver, British Columbia  Canada V6E 4M3

Attention: Mr. Garry L. Anselmo, President

| **RE:** | **SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD.      REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8** |
|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

  We hereby consent to the inclusion by reference of our report dated January  31, 2004, on the consolidated balance sheets of Silverado Gold Mines Ltd. (the  “Company”) as at November 30, 2003 and 2002 and the consolidated  statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the  years then ended in the Company's Form S-8 registration statements filed with  the United States Securities and Exchange Commission as follows:

> 
(1) Form S-8 filed on February 1, 2002;    (2) Form S-8 filed on August 27, 2002;    (3) Form S-8 filed on August 22, 2003; and    (4) Form S-8 filed on January 14, 2004.

 Very truly yours,

*/s/ Morgan & Company*

**Morgan & Company  Chartered Accountants**

| Tel: (604) 687-5841 |                                     | P.O. Box 10007 Pacific Centre |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
| fax: (604) 687-0075 | Sute 1488 - 700 West Georgia Street |
| www.morgan-cas.com  | Vancouver, B.C. V7Y 1A1             |

----
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNew calculations and measurements of the Coulomb cross-section for the production of direct electron pairs by high energy nucleiRecently, new calculations were made of the direct Coulomb pair cross section that rely less in arbitrary parameters. More accurate calculations of the cross section down to low pair energies were made. New measurements of the total direct electron pair yield, and the energy and angular distribution of the electron pairs in emulsion were made for O-16 at 60 and 200 GeV/amu at S-32 at 200 GeV/amu which give satisfactory agreement with the new calculations. These calculations and measurements are presented along with previous accelerator measurements made of this effect during the last 40 years. The microscope scanning criteria used to identify the direct electron pairs is described. Prospects for application of the pair method to cosmic ray energy measurements in the region 10 (exp 13) to 10 (exp 15) eV/amu are discussed.Document ID19900013055Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsDerrickson, J. H.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL., United States)*Dake, S.*(Kobe Univ. (Japan). Huntsville., United States)*Dong, B. L.*(Alabama Univ. Huntsville, AL., United States)*Eby, P. B.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL., United States)*Fountain, W. F.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Matsumoto (Japan)., United States)*Fuki, M.*(Matsusho Gakuen Junior Coll. Huntsville., United States)*Gregory, J. C.*(Alabama Univ. Huntsville., United States)*Hayashi, T.*(Alabama Univ. Knoxville., United States)*Iyono, A.*(Kobe Univ. (Japan).)*King, D. T.*(Tennessee Univ.)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1989Subject CategoryAtomic And Molecular PhysicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-101280NAS 1.15:101280Accession Number90N22371Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAGW-1231Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900013055.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024