alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

 

I, David D. Hillard, Chief Financial Officer of Fisher Communications, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Fisher Communications, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: September 12, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ISSUER'S
UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1998, SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                        (304,660)
<SECURITIES>                                   875,868
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,618,775
<ALLOWANCES>                                   326,578
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,101,573
<PP&E>                                       8,685,047
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,555,447)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,139,207
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,210,887
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,373,235
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,139,207
<SALES>                                     45,126,373
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            45,126,373
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               46,159,192
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (241,343)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                59,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             873,522
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,664,998)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,664,998)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,664,998)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.43)
        

</TABLE>
------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of 1 

'. .i 2 0 

LEGAL PROCESSING DlVlSION 


PUBLICATION &. REGULATIONS 


BRANCH 
 As of: August 20, 2010 

Received: August 09, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 20, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2c6bS 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2)10 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0243 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: Barbara J Lanning 

Address: 

10331 N 149th CIr 

Waverly, NEt 68462 

Email: gramsbarb@gmail.com 

Phone: 402-786-7413 

---------------------------------------------------------------,--­

General Comment 

See attached file(s) 

---------------------------------------------------------------,--­

Attachments 

IRS-2010-0010-0243.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

https:llfdms.erulemaking.netJfdms-web-agency/componentJsubmitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/20/2010 
August 9,2010 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Ai~t 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-201 0­

00 I 0-000 I). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grand fathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these 

regulations. 

Larry and Barbara Lanning 

10331 N I 49th Cir 

Waverly NE 68462
-----------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of 1 

;" 

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 


PUBLICATION&; REGULATIONS 


BRANCH 

As of: August 20, 2010 

Received: August 09, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 20, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2c685 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, :!010 

Submission Tvpe: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathe:-ed 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Statu:; as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-2010-001O-0213 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: Janet Horton 

Address: 

Des Plaines, IL, 

-------------------------------------------------------------,---­

General Comment 

See attached file(s) 

Attachments 

IRS-2010-0010-0213.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

https :llfdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency IcomponentisubmitterInfoCoverPage?Cal1= .._ 8/20/2010 
August 9,2010 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a chiropractor I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-2010­

0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grand fathered " plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these 

regulations. 

Yours in Health, 

Dr. Janet Horton 

960 Rand Road, #225 

Des Plaines, IL 60016
#### The City of New York, Respondent, *v.*Morton H. C. Foster, Appellant.

*City of New York*v. *Foster,*148 App. Div. 358, affirmed.

(Argued April 30, 1912;

decided May 14, 1912.)

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 29,1911, which affirmed a determination of the Appellate Term reversing a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York in

*594favor of defendant and granting a new trial in an action to recover a penalty for an alleged violation of the Building Code of the city of New York.

*George I. Woolley*and *Ira J. Ettinger*for appellant.

*Archibald R. Watson, Corporation Counsel (Terence Farley, John P. O’Brien, Samuel J. Parmenter*and *Harry Crone of*counsel), for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ.
# Aug 31: Military airstrikes continue against ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published Aug. 31, 2015

August 31, 2015Release # 20150831FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**SOUTHWEST ASIA -** On Aug. 30, coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq. In Syria, coalition military forces conducted one airstrike using fighter aircraft. Separately in Iraq, coalition military forces conducted 11 airstrikes coordinated with the government of Iraq using attack, fighter, fighter-attack and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL targets.The following is a summary of the strikes conducted against ISIL since the last press release:**Syria*** Near Al Hawl, one airstrike destroyed an ISIL excavator.**Iraq*** Near Al Baghdadi, one airstrike destroyed an ISIL homemade explosives cache and an ISIL resupply boat.* Near Bayji, one airstrike struck an ISIL large tactical unit and destroyed three ISIL vehicles and an ISIL barge.* Near Kisik, one airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed two ISIL IEDs and an ISIL vehicle.* Near Ramadi, one airstrike destroyed an ISIL mortar system.* Near Sinjar, two airstrikes struck two ISIL tactical units and destroyed two ISIL fighting positions, an ISIL heavy machine gun, an ISIL light machine gun and an ISIL vehicle.* Near Sultan Abdallah, two airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed two ISIL fighting positions, two ISIL heavy machine guns and an ISIL excavator.* Near Tal Afar, one airstrike struck an ISIL heavy machine gun firing position.* Near Tuz, two airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL vehicle.Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely.The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria and the wider international community.The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Iraq include Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Syria include Bahrain, Canada, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates and the U.S.
[No. 1935.]

#### Carnahan v. Connolly.

*Error to the District Court of Lake County.*

Mr. Charles J. Hughes, Jr., and Mr. John M. Maxwell, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Thomas, Bryant & Lee, for defendant in error.

Mr. A. S. Blake, of counsel.

*Per Curiam.*

The questions involved in this case are the same as those determined in No. 1933, Charles T. Carnahan, plaintiff in error, v. P. K. Connolly, defendant in error, and for reasons given in that case the judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   March      2, 2009 | By:    | /s/      Patricia K.      Collawn                                    |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                      |   | Patricia      K. Collawn                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|                                      |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|                                      |   | Public      Service Company of New Mexico                                                                                                                                                                                                           |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 411 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 411

Supporting the goals of Taiwanese American Heritage Week, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 2, 2002

 Mr. Wu submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Supporting the goals of Taiwanese American Heritage Week, and for other 
                               purposes.

Whereas May 11-18, 2002, marks the third annual Taiwanese American Heritage 
        Week;
Whereas the annual Taiwanese American Heritage Week celebration is a vehicle to 
        create awareness and promote the image and welfare of Taiwanese 
        Americans in the United States;
Whereas Taiwanese American Heritage Week helps enhance a mutual understanding 
        and consolidation among different generations of Taiwanese Americans;
Whereas the Taiwanese American community strongly supports democracy, human 
        rights, and the rule of law;
Whereas Taiwan is committed to the principles of freedom, justice, and 
        democracy, as evidenced by Taiwan's free and open contests in local, 
        legislative, and presidential elections;
Whereas frequent exchanges, including exchanges at the highest level of 
        government, contribute to broadening the friendship and cooperation 
        between the United States and Taiwan; and
Whereas the United States and Taiwan share common ideals and a vision for a 
        peaceful and democratic 21st century: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) declares that the warm relations and bilateral exchange 
        between the people of the United States and Taiwan should grow; 
        and
            (2) supports the goals of Taiwanese American Heritage Week 
        and recognizes the profound importance of Taiwanese Americans 
        to the United States.
                                 <all>
```
H. Res. 483

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 16, 2002.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 5093) making appropriations for the Department of the Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year

ending September 30, 2003, and for other purposes. The first

reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order

against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate

shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour

equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking

minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. After

general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment

under the five-minute rule. The amendments printed in the

report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted in the House and in the

Committee of the Whole. Points of order against provisions

in the bill, as amended, for failure to comply with clause 2
2

•HRES 483 EH

of rule XXI are waived except as follows: beginning with

‘‘Provided’’ on page 29, line 22, through page 30, line 11;

page 68, lines 1 through 7. Where points of order are waived

against part of a paragraph, points of order against a provision in another part of such paragraph may be made only

against such provision and not against the entire paragraph.

During consideration of the bill for further amendment, the

Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority

in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering

an amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of

the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in

clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. During consideration of the bill, points of

order against amendments for failure to comply with clause

2(e) of rule XXI are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and

report the bill, as amended, to the House with such further

amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
KENNY MARCHANT WASHINGTON OFFICE:

227 CANNON House OrFice BUILOING

247u District, Texas WASHINGTON, DC 20516
(202) 225-6605
; ostncr omc

ANANCIAL SERVICES Congress of the Cluited States oot es ate ah Pan
Susconmimee on House of Representatives (372) 580-0162

FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ANO CONSUMER CREDIT
Washington, BC 20515-4324

SUBCOMMITTEE ON
Housing AND ComMUNITY OPPORTUNITY

July 16, 2010

The Honorable Hilda L. Solis
Secretary

Department of Labor

200 Constitution Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20210

Dear Secretary Solis:

Jam writing to you regarding the interim final rules for group health plans and health
insurance coverage relating to their status as a grandfathered health Plan under the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act.

Thave been contacted by constituents who have expressed their frustrations in attempting
to make relatively minor changes to their preexisting health insurance coverage. These
constituents have been told that any minor change to their preexisting health insurance
coverage could revoke their grandfathered plan status.

Iam writing to ask that as the Department issues its final rules on this subject, that health
insurance policy holders be allowed the maximum flexibility to make minor changes that
do not affect the overall value of their plan. Particularly, should policy holders wish to
change the amount of their monthly premiums as compared to their deductable, I would
ask that the Department allow policyholders maximum flexibility for these potential
changes.

Thank you for your consideration of this letter and I look forward to your reply. Should
you need any additional information, please feel free to contact me, or my Legislative
Director, Scott Cunningham, at 202.225.6605 or scott.cunningham@mail.house.gov at
your convenience.

Sincerely,

Member of Congtess

PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER



ce:

Office of Health Plan Standards and Compliance Assistance
US Department of Labor

Employee Benefits Security Administration

Attn: RIN 1210-AB42

Hi
i
i
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

KAYLA M. SUPANCIK, AN INCAPACITED PERSON, BY ELIZABETH SUPANCIK,

PLENARY GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON AND ESTATE, AND APRIL SUPANCIK,
INDIVIDUALLY,

Petitioners

v.

TYLER M. ROBINSON,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 378 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

KAYLA M. SUPANCIK, AN INCAPACITED PERSON, BY ELIZABETH SUPANCIK,

PLENARY GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON AND ESTATE, AND APRIL SUPANCIK,
INDIVIDUALLY,

Respondents

v.

TYLER M. ROBINSON,

Cross Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 401 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11th day of December, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MICHAEL EDWARDS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D23-534

[August 31, 2023]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 15-2476CF10A.

Michael Edwards, Lake City, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.