alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 655.41 Pre-employment drug testing. ( a ) ( 1 ) Before allowing a covered employee or applicant to perform a safety-sensitive function for the first time, the employer must ensure that the employee takes a pre-employment drug test administered under this part with a verified negative result. An employer may not allow a covered employee, including an applicant, to perform a safety-sensitive function unless the employee takes a drug test administered under this part with a verified negative result.
( 2 ) When a covered employee or applicant has previously failed or refused a pre-employment drug test administered under this part, the employee must provide the employer proof of having successfully completed a referral, evaluation and treatment plan as described in § 655.62.
( b ) An employer may not transfer an employee from a nonsafety-sensitive function to a safety-sensitive function until the employee takes a pre-employment drug test administered under this part with a verified negative result.
( c ) If a pre-employment drug test is canceled, the employer shall require the covered employee or applicant to take another pre-employment drug test administered under this part with a verified negative result.
( d ) When a covered employee or applicant has not performed a safety-sensitive function for 90 consecutive calendar days regardless of the reason, and the employee has not been in the employer's random selection pool during that time, the employer shall ensure that the employee takes a pre-employment drug test with a verified negative result.
Editorial Note on Part 453
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 453 appear at 74 FR 49241, Sept. 25, 2009.

§ 453.1 Unsafe and noncomplying containers subject to detention or control. ( a ) Any container used in or offered for movement in international transport which does not have a valid safety approval plate attached to it is subject to detention or other control by a District Commander or Captain of the Port. However, upon receipt of evidence that a container which does not have a valid safety approval plate attached to it meets the standards of the convention, the District Commander or Captain of the Port may authorize limited movement of such container under conditions he deems appropriate. This paragraph becomes effective on January 3, 1979 for new containers and on January 1, 1985 for existing containers.
( b ) If a District Commander or Captain of the Port finds that a container used in or offered for movement in international transport, even though it has a valid safety approval plate attached to it, is in a condition that creates an obvious risk to safety, he issues a detention order causing the container to be removed from service until it is restored to a safe condition. In addition to removing a container from transport, a detention order may require any special handling, including unloading prior to movement, necessary to ensure safety.
( c ) If a District Commander or Captain of the Port finds that a container used or offered for movement in international transport has not been timely examined, the District Commander or Captain of the Port affixes to the container, at a place on the container where it will be readily noticeable to anyone loading or unloading the container, a mark or tag indicating that the container must be examined before being reloaded and again used in international transport. The mark or tag affixed by the District Commander or Captain of the Port indicates the place and the date on which it was affixed, and is capable of remaining legible and in place for at least 12 months. Such mark or tag must not be removed until the container is examined in accordance with § 452.3 of this subchapter. If a District Commander or Captain of the Port finds that container marked or tagged as provided for in this paragraph was reloaded and used or offered for movement in international transport without having been examined, the District Commander or Captain of the Port issues a detention order causing the container to be removed from service until it is brought into compliance.
[45 FR 37217, June 2, 1980, as amended at 47 FR 50496, Nov. 8, 1982]
#### § 563.3 Application.

This part applies to the following vehicles manufactured on or after September 1, 2012, if they are equipped with an event data recorder: passenger cars, multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks, and buses with a GVWR of 3,855 kg (8,500 pounds) or less and an unloaded vehicle weight of 2,495 kg (5,500 pounds) or less, except for walk-in van-type trucks or vehicles designed to be sold exclusively to the U.S. Postal Service. This part also applies to manufacturers of those vehicles. However, vehicles manufactured before September 1, 2013 that are manufactured in two or more stages or that are altered (within the meaning of 49 CFR 567.7) after having been previously certified to the Federal motor vehicle safety standards in accordance with part 567 of this chapter need not meet the requirements of this part.

[73 FR 2179, Jan. 14, 2008]
Docket: EBSA-2010-0007 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in 

Retirement Plans 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0007-0001 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options 

Document: EBSA-2010-0007-DRAFT-0069 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: D C P 

Address: GA 

General Comment 

DO NOT INTERFERE WITH US. 

LIMIT GOVERNMENT CONTROL. 

Constitutional Authority 

I vehemently OPPOSE the federal government's involvement in the retirement planning of individual 

citizens and I believe such actions exceed the limited powers delegated by the several state and the 

people to the federal government via the US Constitution. We want you to leave us the hell alone! 

Compassion and Charity 

It is not the federal, state, or local government's role to provide for the every need of each person - 

citizen or not - within the United States. Morality, compassion and charity must come from individual 

character rather than government mandate - and you really can not effectively legislate those qualities. 

Our nation was founded on the power of personal responsibility, free choices to act or not, and the 

resulting consequences. People need to be ambitious enough to provide for themselves without 

government interference. People will take care of each other without the government being involved. 

Socialism, communism, or fascism have no place in the USA. 

Nest Eggs 

Those of us that have been industrious enough to create wealth and save for our retirement or other 

needs do not deserve to be penalized for others who have not done so. Government interference with our 

nest eggs is tyranny and will not be tolerated. Leave us and our wealth alone! 

Government 

Government has consistently proven that it is incapable of being as efficient as free market participants. 

Even worse, government decision making is subject to corruption by prevailing unbalanced political 

influences. The huge unfunded liabilities (empty promises of about $107 TRILLION in 2009 dollars) of 

Medicare and Social Security are more than enough evidence to forbid government meddling with the 

lives of We The People. Leave us the hell alone! 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: April 19, 2010 

Received: April 14, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80ad762d 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 2

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=Print&PrintId=0900006480ad76... 4/19/2010
Page 2 of 2

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=Print&PrintId=0900006480ad76... 4/19/2010
#### § 9.19 Acceptance of service on behalf of Secretary.

In any legal proceeding, at the option of the server, process or pleadings may be served on agency counsel, with the same effect as if served upon the Secretary or the head of the operating administration concerned, as the case may be. The official accepting service under this section shall acknowledge the service and take appropriate action. This section does not in any way abrogate or modify the requirements of Rule 4(d)(4) and 4(d)(5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure regarding service of summons and complaint.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated:  November 6, 2008
    /s/ Ben M. BrighamBen M. BrighamChief Executive Officer, President and Chairman
of the Board
#### § 91.3 Investigations.

The Assistant Secretary for Policy, Plans and International Affairs (Assistant Secretary), in coordination with the General Counsel and the Federal Aviation Administrator (Administrator), on complaint of any U.S. flag air carrier or on their own initiative, shall investigate: (a) Instances of alleged excessive or otherwise discriminatory user charges or (b) discriminatory or unfair competitive practices to which U.S. flag air carriers are subjected by a foreign government or other foreign entity. Excessive or otherwise discriminatory charges include, but are not limited to, unreasonable landing fees, unreasonable monopoly ground handling fees and unreasonable air navigation charges. Discriminatory or unfair competitive practices include, but are not limited to, unreasonably differentiated fuel allocations, cargo, charter or currency restrictions and inferior monopoly ground handling services.
#### § 510.4 Subpoenas, generally.

NHTSA may issue to any person, sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, or other entity a subpoena requiring the production of documents or things (subpoena duces tecum) and testimony of witnesses (subpoena ad testificandum), or both, relating to any matter under investigation or the subject of any inquiry. Subpoenas are issued by the Chief Counsel. When a person, sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, or other entity is served with a subpoena ad testificandum under this part, the subpoena will describe with reasonable particularity the matters on which the testimony is required. In response to a subpoena ad testificandum, the sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, or other entity so named shall designate one or more officers, directors, or managing agents, or other persons who consent to testify on its behalf, and set forth, for each person designated, the matters on which he or she will testify. The persons so designated shall testify as to matters known or reasonably available to the entity.

[53 FR 26261, July 12, 1988]
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2370

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the veterans’ adjustable

rate mortgage demonstration project through the first three months

of fiscal year 1996.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 21, 1995

Mr. BUYER (for himself, Ms. WATERS, Mr. STUMP, and Mr. MONTGOMERY)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the veterans’ adjustable rate mortgage demonstration project

through the first three months of fiscal year 1996.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 3707(a) of title 38, United States Code, is

4 amended by striking out ‘‘and 1995’’ and inserting in lieu

5 thereof ‘‘1995, and the first three months of 1996’’.

Æ
#### William J. Reedy and others, Respondents, v. Uriah C. Whitlock and others, Appellants.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered before another referee, costs to abide event. Opinion by Barker. J.
# Eiropas Savienības C 153A/2004

| | ISSN 1725-5201 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 153A |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Informācija un paziņojumi | 47. sējums2004. gada 10. jūnijs |

ISSN 1725-5201

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 153A

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Informācija un paziņojumi

47. sējums2004. gada 10. jūnijs

---

| Paziņojums Nr. | Saturs | Lappuse |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Paziņojumi |
| | Padome |
| 2004/C 153A/1 | Paziņojums par vakanci (sludinājuma Nr. A/013) | 1 |

Paziņojums Nr.

Saturs

Lappuse

III   Paziņojumi

Padome

2004/C 153A/1

Paziņojums par vakanci (sludinājuma Nr. A/013)

1

| LV | |
| --- | --- |

LV

---

III Paziņojumi

Padome

| 10.6.2004 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | CA 153/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2004

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

CA 153/1

---

PAZIŅOJUMS PAR VAKANCI

(sludinājuma Nr. A/013)

KONKURSS UZ ADMINISTRATORA VIETU

(2004/C 153 A/01)

Eiropas kopējās drošības un aizsardzības politikas (KDAP) ietvaros Eiropas Savienības Padomes Ģenerālsekretariāts izsludina konkursu uz A*9 pakāpes administratora vietu E Ģenerāldirekcijas – Ārējie sakari – VIII direkcijā darbam ar aizsardzības jautājumiem.

Plašāku informāciju (pieejama angļu un franču valodā) un kandidatūras veidlapas var iegūt, sazinoties ar atlases un darbā pieņemšanas dienestu pa e-pastu: service.recrutement@consilium.eu.int vai aplūkojot minētā dienesta interneta mājas lapu http://ue.eu.int/concours.

Kandidatūras pieteikumi jāiesniedz līdz 2004. gada 9. jūlijam (pasta zīmogs).

---
Afghan students connect online with U.S. soldiers
 By Sgt. Albert L. Kelley , 300th Mobile Public Affairs Detachment
  100928_online
 NANGARHAR PROVINCE, Afghanistan (Sept. 26, 2010) — Female students from a Jalalabad high school recently spent a morning chatting online with  three female soldiers here.    The students were participating in a State Department sponsored  program called the Global Connections and Exchange program. The GCE is  administered through a grant to the La Jolla Golden Triangle Rotary Club  Foundation located in San Diego. “The purpose of the program is to promote mutual understanding and  democratic values in Afghanistan through links with American teens,”  said Anna Mussman, a Department of State public diplomacy officer  attached to Task Force Bastogne. “These links encouraged Jalalabad  students and teachers to conduct research, improve their English  language skills and learn about life in the United States.” Currently, there are nine schools involved in the program, including an  agricultural and technical high school. Each school contains a computer  lab with approximately 15 workstations and an average of 50  participants. Students interested in joining the program take an English test to  qualify. Once accepted into the program, they attend a month-long  training program that focuses on computer and Internet usage. The three American Soldiers who chatted with the students were all  volunteers with varied personal and professional backgrounds including a  human resources sergeant, noncommissioned officer in charge of  psychological operations and a brigade provost marshal. “I think this was encouraging for them,” said Sgt. Dianne T.  Peele, a human resource manager from Portsmouth, Va., assigned to  Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Brigade Combat Team, Task  Force Bastogne. “I think it encouraged them to set goals if they didn’t  have them already.” The young Afghan teens left an indelible mark on Capt. Joyce  A. Louden, of Fort Campbell, Ky., with their poise, confidence and  English ability. “I will definitely stay involved,” said Louden, the brigade provost  marshal. “I thought it was amazing how good their English was.  I enjoyed their talent at being bilingual.” The chat session lasted only an hour, but the impact it had on the young  females was obvious to Spc. Jessica A. Walker of Anoka,  Minn. “I think the youth of Afghanistan are going to make a positive impact  for the future of Afghanistan,” Walker said. “Education is spreading  throughout Afghanistan, and the youth are grasping on to it like a  lifeline.”
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIE JAMES WALTERS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division

Considered May 12, 1952

Decided May 21, 1952.

*598Before Judges Eastwood, Bigelow and Ebancis.

*Mr. Eugene T. Urbanialc,*Deputy Attorney-General, for plaintiff-respondent *(Mr. Theodore D. Parsons,*Attorney-General, attorney).

*Mr. Willie James Walters, pro se,*for defendant-appellant.

Pee Cubiam.

The defendant appeals from the denial by the Mercer County Court, Law Division, of his application for a writ of *habeas corpus*to review the judgment of conviction by the Cumberland County Court on an indictment returned against him on September 20, 1945, charging him with murder in the first degree. On October 4, 1946, on *599advice of his court appointed counsel, defendant entered a plea of guilty to second degree murder and was thereupon sentenced to serve not less than 20 nor more than 30 years in State Prison, where he is presently confined.

In its refusal to grant the writ, the Mercer County Court held, under the authority of *In re Tremper,*126 *N. J. Eq.*276 *(Ch.*1939), that the defendant, not having taken any appeal and not having made any application for *habeas corpus*“in attempted vindication of these constitutional rights * * * his later application to correct these constitutional errors, is considered as a ‘fraud and imposition’ on the courts and people of the State of New Jersey.”

The defendant contends that his constitutional rights to a speedy and public trial were violated in that he was confined to the Cumberland County jail for approximately 1 months before the State brought him to trial; and that he did not have adequate counsel to represent him in the preparation for trial and in connection with the plea entered by him.

“Although there is admittedly no fixed time limit within which the writ of *habeas corpus*may be sought, there are decisions in which courts have expressed the view that the issuance of the writ may, under proper circumstances, be denied because of the delay in seeking it. See *In re Tremper, supra; In re Zee, supra*[13 *N. J. Super.*312 *(Cty. Ct.*1951)]; 39 *C. J. S.*619 (1944). But *cf. In re Gladstone, supra*[12 *N. J. Super.*589 *(Cty. Ct.*1951)]; *People ex rel. Albanese v. Hunt,*177 *Misc.*151, 30 *N. Y. S. 2d*137 *(Sup. Ct.*1941), reversed on other ground in 266 *App. Div.*105, 41 *N. Y. S. 2d*646 (1943).” *State v. Ballard,*15 *N. J. Super.*417, 421, 422 *(App. Div.*1951), affirmed 9 *N. J.*402 (May 19, 1952). On the contrary, the writ of *habeas corpus*has been issued and unconstitutional convictions have been set aside even after the lapse of many years. *State v. Ballard, supra; State v. Zasada,*19 *N. J. Super.*589 *(App. Div.*1952). We need not necessarily determine, in the instant case, that the defendant’s constitutional rights *600were violated, but we conclude that the writ should have been issued to afford the defendant a hearing.

The action of the lower court is reversed and the cause is remanded for hearing and further proceedings in conformity with this opinion.
§ 650.13 Limitation. ( a ) Nothing in this part may be construed to allow the Administrator to modify or waive any requirement under— ( 1 ) 49 U.S.C. 5333;
( 2 ) The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321, *et seq.*); or
( 3 ) Any other provision of Federal statute.
( b ) The Administrator's approval of an application under this part does not commit Federal-aid funding for the project.
P.O. Box 60908 Fairbanks, AK 99706 / 5525 Airport Industrial Rd., Fairbanks AK 99709 

Telephone (907) 450-2375 Fax (907) 450-2326

March 5, 2012 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Rulemaking, ARM 

800 Independence Avenue, Room 810 

Washington, DC 20591 

Via electronic submission on web site 

Re: Exemption No. 4296 for FAR 91.9(a) 

Everts Air Fuel wishes to amend its present Exemption No. 4296, granting relief from the 

requirements of FAR 91.31(a). 

We request this exemption based on the ongoing requirements of our business in 

supplying isolated villages by the only means of transportation available in the State of 

Alaska. The reasons and facts as described in the request that resulted in the granting of 

Exemption No. 4296 remain unchanged. We ask that it include the following DC-6 

aircraft operated by Everts: registration Nos. N251CE, N400UA, N444CE, N451CE 

N7780B, N7919C, N51599, N555SQ, N888DG, N747CE, N6586C. 

In considering the forgoing, we request that amending our exemption is in the public 

interest and desire that Exemption No. 4296 be granted. 

Sincerely, 

James A. Young 

Director of Operations 

Everts Air Fuel
#### §§ 807.112-807.129 [Reserved]
August 11, 2010 

Office ofConsumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department ofHealth and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for C.JfOUP Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 


Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 


Below are my comments regarding the Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health 


Insurance Coverage Relating to Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient ~ 

Protection and Affordable Care Act (pP ACA). 


I believe that every effort should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by 


PPACA, especiaUy as of January 1,2014 when most ofthe reform components (Insurance 


Exchanges, Subsidies, Tax Credits, etc.) come into play. 


The average consumer has a broad definition of "benefits." Consumers view their health plan 


beyond the covered benefits, cost sharing, and the contribution levels associated with the plan. 


It is my opinion that the Rule may still result in some confusion to the marketplace in its 


application. For example~ if an employer raised the copayment level beyond the maximum in one 


area (i.e. outpatient services) but retained the copayment level for primary care doctor visits, 


does that mean a loss ofgrandfather status? Clarity will be critical both for the employer and,. the 


employee. . 


Even by the most optimistic estimates, a substantial portion ofthe employee population will 


remain outside the PPACA as ofJanuary 2014 based on the current rules. While I understand the 


difficulty involved in making change, creating another large sub-population of excluded 


individuals will only add to costs, increase confusion, and mitigate the potential impact ofthe 


legislation. 


-.-..~ ~,,-.-,-,--- - - -" ---'

The Rule needs to be clear, reasonable, and with no ambiguities involved in determining whether 

a group health plan is "in or out." The decisions the federal government makes today will 

determine the outcomes for tomorrow. We may need to make some difficult decisions to create 

a sustainable health care system that will support a growing economy in the future. That means 

getting as many citizens across the country participating at the beginning to make it work and 

delivering on its promises to retain their support. 

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this regulation. 

J Campione DC