alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 78 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                   House Calendar No. 3
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 78

                           [Report No. 107-8]

    Providing for the consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2001

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Providing for the consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

    Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on the legislative 
day of Wednesday, March 7, 2001, for the Speaker to entertain motions 
that the House suspend the rules relating to the following measures:
            (1) The concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 31) expressing 
        the sense of the Congress regarding the importance of organ, 
        tissue, bone marrow, and blood donation and supporting National 
        Donor Day;
            (2) The bill (H.R. 624) to amend the Public Health Service 
        Act to promote organ donation; and
            (3) The concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 47) honoring 
        the 21 members of the National Guard who were killed in the 
        crash of a National Guard aircraft on March 3, 2001, in south-
        central Georgia.

                                                   House Calendar No. 3

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. RES. 78

                           [Report No. 107-8]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

    Providing for the consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 6, 2001

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Exhibit 32.1 to Form 10-QSB/A

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Cecil a. Brooks does hereby  certify that the  Quarterly  Report of  Cornerstone
Ministries Investments, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31,
2003 (the  "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 12, 2003.

/s/ Cecil A. Brooks, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
--------------------------------------------------------------------


Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

John T.  Ottinger,  does hereby  certify that the Annual  Report of  Cornerstone
Ministries Investments, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31,
2003 (the  "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 12, 2003.

/s/ John T. Ottinger, Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
----------------------------------------------------------------
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-2697

_____________________________

ERIC A. WELCH,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

and STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Angela C. Dempsey, Judge.

February 13, 2024

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

LEWIS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Eric A. Welch, pro se, Appellant.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellees.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 23

               [Letterhead of Deloitte Touche Brightman Almagor]
                              Our Ref: 703288
                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants of Trinet Venture Capital Ltd., we hereby
consent to the incorporation of our report dated March 20, 2001, included in
Form 1O-K of Ampal-American Israel Corporation for the year ended December 31,
2000 (relating to the financial statements of Trinet Venture Capital Ltd. not
included herein), into Ampal-American Israel Corporation's previously filed
Registration Statements No. 333-61895 and No. 333-55970.


/s/ Brightman, Almagor & Co.
BRIGHTMAN ALMAGOR & CO.

Certified Public Accountants

A member of Deloitte Touche

March 26, 2001.
243-A Burgess Road, Greensboro NC 27409

Office (336) 665-7149 www.skyleasecargo.com

10 February 2015 

VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION 

U. S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Ave., S.W.

Washington, DC 20591

Re: Request for Extension of Exemption 10231A, Docket FAA-2006-26080 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

In accordance with §11.61 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), Sky Lease I, Inc., 

d.b.a. TradeWinds Airlines, d.b.a. TradeWinds, petitions the Administrator for an extension of 

Exemption 10231A, Docket FAA-2006-26080. The exemption provides relief from 

§121.434(c)(1)(ii) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allowing Sky Lease I to 

substitute a qualified and authorized check airman for an FAA Inspector to observe a qualifying 

pilot in command (PIC) who is completing initial or upgrade training as specified in §121.434 

during at least one flight leg that includes a takeoff and landing. 

Granting of this extension continues to be in the public interest and would continue to allow the 

FAA to focus its inspection force on higher priority safety issues. It would also continue to provide 

for a higher level of PIC candidate scrutiny by using Sky Lease I check airman who are more 

familiar with company operating policies and procedures. 

Granting of this extension would continue to have no significant impact upon safety. The 

authorized check airman are highly trained, experienced, and qualified in the specific aircraft 

types. Sky Lease I check airman are only used to satisfy the requirements of §121.434(c)(1)(ii) 

when a qualified FAA Inspector is not available. 

Sky Lease I is aware that the FAA has granted extensions to other air carriers for similar relief 

sought by this request. Therefore, since granting this extension is not precedent setting, Sky Lease 

I requests that publication of this petition in the Federal Register be waived in accordance with 

Section 11.87(b). 
U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket FAA-2006-26080

10 February 2015

Page Two

SUMMARY

Sky Lease I, Inc. Petition for Extension of Exemption 10231A

Sky Lease I, Inc. petitions the Administrator for an extension of Exemption 10231A, Docket FAA2006-26080. The exemption provides relief from §121.434(c)(1)(ii) of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR) allowing Sky Lease I to substitute a qualified and authorized check airman 

for an FAA Inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in command (PIC) who is completing initial or 

upgrade training as specified in §121.434 during at least one flight leg that includes a takeoff and 

landing. 

Should you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at 336-668-

7505.

Sincerely, 

Herman F. Gillis, III

Director of Operations

hgillis@skylease.aero

cc: C. Barco – VP Operations & Maintenance

R. Lohlein – Chief Pilot

Bob Nance – Director of Maintenance

Michael Steinke – Director of Quality

A. Duffy – Director of Safety

K. Humphries – FAA POI EA039
---

---

EXHIBIT 23.6



CONSENT OF
  INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
  (Form S-8 No.333-61895 and Form S-8 No.333-55970) of our report dated March
  5, 2003, with respect to the financial statements of Country Club Kfar Saba
  Ltd. included in the Annual Report (Form 10K) for 2003 of Ampal-American Israel
  Corporation.



| | **Luboshitz
      Kasierer**             
| | -----------------------------------------
| | Certified
      Public Accountants (Isr.)

March 24, 2004

---

---
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                        MELITA INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
                   COMPUTATION OF PRO FORMA EARNINGS PER SHARE
             (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          Three Months
                                                                          Ended March 31
                                                                         1998        1997
                                                                         ----        ----
           <S>                                                          <C>         <C>  
           DILUTED
           Weighted average common stock outstanding                     8,000       8,000
           Effect of the combination (1)                                 3,143       3,143
           Effect of issuance of shares in IPO                           4,025          --
           Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents                     824         194
           Cheap stock adjustment (2)                                       --         116
           Effect of shareholder distribution (3)                           --       1,194
                                                                            --       -----
           Weighted average common and common equivalent shares         15,992      12,647
                                                                        ======      ======
           Net income after income tax                                   2,548       2,320
           Earnings per share                                              .16         .18
                                                                        ======      ======
           Pro forma net income                                          2,548       1,425
           Pro forma earnings per share                                    .16         .11
                                                                        ======      ======
</TABLE>


(1)  Reflects pro forma issuance of 3,143 shares of Common Stock in connection
     with the combination of Melita International Corporation, Melita Europe
     Limited and Inventions, Inc.

(2)  Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin
     No. 83, common stock and common stock equivalents issued at prices below
     the assumed initial public offering price per share ("cheap stock") during
     the twelve months immediately preceding the initial filing date of the
     Company's Registration Statement for its public offering have been included
     as outstanding for all periods presented.

(3)  Pursuant to Staff Accounting Bulletin 1B.3, pro forma earnings per share
     gives effect to the issuance by the Company of the numbers of shares that,
     of the assumed public offering price, would yield proceeds in the amount
     necessary to pay the shareholder distribution that is not covered by the
     earnings during the period.













                                       12
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2154

To privatize environmental testing analysis, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 1, 1995

Mr. LIPINSKI (for himself and Mr. POSHARD) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in addition to

the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure and Resources, for

a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To privatize environmental testing analysis, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PRIVATIZATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING

4 ANALYSIS.

5 All Federal departments and agencies performing en6 vironmental testing analyses, in support of monitoring, as7 sessment, or compliance decisionmaking, or both, pursu8 ant to Federal, State, or municipal statutes, regulations,

9 or other legal requirements, shall use exclusively non-
2

•HR 2154 IH

1 governmental testing laboratories, so long as testing proto2 cols, method requirements, preservation times, transpor3 tation times, or holding times can be achieved. Any State

4 or local government or institution of higher education per5 forming any such environmental testing analysis for such

6 purposes shall also use exclusively nongovernmental test7 ing laboratories, so long as testing protocols, method re8 quirements, preservation times, transportation times, or

9 holding times can be achieved if Federal grants or other

10 Federal assistance is used to carry out such analysis.

11 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

12 This Act shall take effect with respect to any environ13 mental testing analysis commenced after the date of the

14 enactment of this Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                            3668
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2915
<ALLOWANCES>                                        83
<INVENTORY>                                       2983
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1101
<PP&E>                                            2621
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1346
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   15040
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3210
<BONDS>                                            350
<COMMON>                                           687
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                        8357
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     15040
<SALES>                                          17485
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 17485
<CGS>                                             8326
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     8326
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  6800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 124
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2235
<INCOME-TAX>                                       914
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1321
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1321
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39
        

</TABLE>
singpivision EE 6-18 Uae 10

LEGAL PROCES

Page 1 of 1

PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS YUL 2 9 vu:

https://fdms.erulemaking .net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=...

BRANCH

[As of: ny 28, 0 0

Received: July 22, 201
PUBLIC aos
SUBMISSION comments Due: September 15, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0002
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Status as Grandfathered Health Plan under
the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Cross-Reference

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0009
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14487

trietown 3 Submitter Information

General Comment

It is my understanding that a grandfathered plan has been defined by ACA as one that was not
subject to ERISA or State law on or before March 23, 2010. In order to be exempted from ERISA,
the plan must be a self-insured plan. If the plan is self-insured, there is no insurance carrier to
file the paperwork. If the plan is thru a health insurance company, then it is not grandfathered.

Even if the proposed law is correct, to say that an employer cannot change insurance carriers or
they will lose their grandfathered status, is to put an enormous financial burden on small
business. You may be able to limit the cost increase to the employee/insured, but you cannot
limit how much the insurance carrier will charge the employer if they are forever stuck with the
same insurance carrier and are not allowed to bid their insurance for better rates.

7128/2010
From: Thompson, Mary (FAA)
To: Williams, Dale (FAA)
Cc: Rowe, Salli M (FAA) ; Persons, Jeanine (FAA) ; Valette, Mark J (FAA) Subject: Construction Helicopters Withdrawal (FAA-2012-0044)
Date: Monday, December 01, 2014 11:45:25 AM

Hi –

Please see Construction’s withdrawal below. Let us know if we need to provide anything further to
close this one out.

Thanks,

Mary Thompson Flight Standards, Air Transportation Division, Policy Integration Branch, AFS-270 (202) 267-7959

From: Matt Van Pelt [mailto:MVanPelt@CHIAviation.com] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 11:25 AM To: Thompson, Mary (FAA) Subject: Re: Request for Additional Information (Petition for Exemption FAA-2012-0044)

Ma'am,

CHI Aviation is withdrawing the petition. The applicable burden to the industry has been removed.



### V/R

Matt Van Pelt Director of Operations 800-521-5130 517-376-8772 Cell 800-521-4275 Fax
Grafton,

Dec., 1895.

#### Bickford *v.*Poor.

A tax sale is rendered invalid by statements ol the purchaser made at the time of the sale for the purpose and with the effect of preventing competition.

Writ oe Entry. Facts found by the court. The defendant claims title under a tax collector’s deed to him, founded upon a sale for non-resident taxes assessed upon the demanded premises by the selectmen of Landaffin 1879. The plaintiff acquired his title from grantees of the New Hampshire Iron Company, who were the owners of the premises in 1879.

When the collector offered this land at the sale the defendant stated in substance to those present that he supposed his father had the money to pay the taxes, and if no one had any claims upon the land he would bid it off, and thought his father would pay him as soon as he saw him. His father was an old man and then lived about a mile distant from the defendant. His object was to afford further convenient opportunity to his father to pay the taxes. This statement prevented competition, and the defendant was the only bidder.

*George H. Bingham*and *Smith $ Sloane,*for the plaintiff.

*George F. Morris*and *Bingham, Mitchell £ Batchellor,*for the defendant.

*444Parsons, J.

The defendant claims title by virtue of a tax collector’s deed to him, founded upon a sale in 1879. The plaintiff has the title of the owner at the time of the tax sale. The case finds as a fact that the defendant’s statement made at the sale prevented competition. This fact is fatal to the defendant’s title. *u*The sale must be a public sale with opportunity for open competition.” Cool. Tax. 339. “ It is essential to the validity of tax sales, not merely that they should be conducted in conformity with the requirements of law, but that they should be conducted with perfect fairness. Perfect freedom from all influences likely to prevent competition in the sale should be in all cases strictly exacted.” *Slater*v. Maxwell, 6 Wall 268, 276. This case, decided in the supreme court of the United States and supported by the authorities generally (Burr. Tax. *351;*Black. Tax Tit., *ss.*397-399; *Kerwer*v. *Allen,*31 Ia. 578), is decisive of the present case. The finding of fact upon this point being sufficient to determine the case, the other objections suggested have not been considered.

*Judgment for the plaintiff.*

Chase, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
# Servicemember killed in raid on al-Qa’ida headquarters in Yemen

/ Published Jan. 29, 2017

Jan. 29, 2017

RELEASE 20170129-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla. –** One U.S. servicemember died of wounds suffered in a raid against al-Qa’ida in the Arabian Peninsula in Yemen, Jan. 28.

“We are deeply saddened by the loss of one of our elite servicemembers,” said Commander of U.S. Central Command Gen. Joseph Votel. “The sacrifices are very profound in our fight against terrorists who threaten innocent peoples across the globe.”

Three U.S. servicemembers were wounded in the raid.

A U.S. military aircraft assisting in the operation experienced a hard landing at a nearby location, resulting in an additional U.S. injury. That aircraft was unable to fly after the landing. The aircraft was then intentionally destroyed in place.

The operation resulted in an estimated 14 AQAP members being killed and the capture of information that will likely provide insight into the planning of future terror plots.

This is one in a series of aggressive moves against terrorist planners in Yemen and worldwide. Similar operations have produced intelligence on al-Qa’ida logistics, recruiting and financing efforts.

The name of the servicemember killed in action is being withheld pending next of kin notification.
----

|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ William Pagano           |   |
|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|   |                         |   |
| Name:  | William Pagano               |   |
|   |                         |   |
|   | Chief      Executive Officer |   |
|   |                         |   |
| Date:  | March      27, 2009          |   |

----