U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1

99–011 2002

107th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 107–227

A LEGISLATIVE PROPOSAL

MESSAGE

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

TRANSMITTING

A LEGISLATIVE PROPOSAL TO CREATE A NEW CABINET 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

JUNE 18, 2002.—Message and accompanying papers referred to the Committee on the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered 

to be printed


E:\Seals\Congress.#13
(1)

To the Congress of the United States: 

I hereby transmit to the Congress proposed legislation to create 

a new Cabinet Department of Homeland Security. 

Our Nation faces a new and changing threat unlike any we have 

faced before—the global threat of terrorism. No nation is immune, 

and all nations must act decisively to protect against this constantly evolving threat. 

We must recognize that the threat of terrorism is a permanent 

condition, and we must take action to protect America against the 

terrorists that seek to kill the innocent. 

Since September 11, 2001, all levels of government and leaders 

from across the political spectrum have cooperated like never before. We have strengthened our aviation security and tightened our 

borders. We have stockpiled medicines to defend against bioterrorism and improved our ability to combat weapons of mass destruction. We have dramatically improved information sharing 

among our intelligence agencies, and we have taken new steps to 

protect our critical infrastructure. 

Our Nation is stronger and better prepared today than it was on 

September 11. Yet, we can do better. I propose the most extensive 

reorganization of the Federal Government since the 1940s by creating a new Department of Homeland Security. For the first time 

we would have a single Department whose primary mission is to 

secure our homeland. Soon after the Second World War, President 

Harry Truman recognized that our Nation’s fragmented military 

defenses needed reorganization to help win the Cold War. President Truman proposed uniting our military forces under a single 

entity, now the Department of Defense, and creating the National 

Security Council to bring together defense, intelligence, and diplomacy. President Truman’s reforms are still helping us to fight terror abroad, and today we need similar dramatic reforms to secure 

our people at home. 

President Truman and Congress reorganized our Government to 

meet a very visible enemy in the Cold War. Today our Nation must 

once again reorganize our Government to protect against an ofteninvisible enemy, an enemy that hides in the shadows and an enemy 

that can strike with many different types of weapons. Our enemies 

seek to obtain the most dangerous and deadly weapons of mass destruction and use them against the innocent. While we are winning 

the war on terrorism, Al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations 

still have thousands of trained killers spread across the globe plotting attacks against America and the other nations of the civilized 

world. 

Immediately after last fall’s attack, I used my legal authority to 

establish the White House Office of Homeland Security and the 

Homeland Security Council to help ensure that our Federal response and protection efforts were coordinated and effective. I also 

2

directed Homeland Security Advisor Tom Ridge to study the Federal Government as a whole to determine if the current structure 

allows us to meet the threats of today while preparing for the unknown threats of tomorrow. After careful study of the current 

structure, coupled with the experience gained since September 11 

and new information we have learned about or enemies while fighting a war, I have concluded that our Nation needs a more unified 

homeland security structure. 

I propose to create a new Department of Homeland Security by 

substantially transforming the current confusing patchwork of government activities into a single department whose primary mission 

is to secure our homeland. My proposal builds on the strong bipartisan work on the issue of homeland security that has been conducted by Members of Congress. In designing the new Department, 

my Administration considered a number of homeland security organizational proposals that have emerged from outside studies, commissions, and Members of Congress. 

The Need for a Department of Homeland Security 

Today no Federal Government agency has homeland security as 

its primary mission. Responsibilities for homeland security are dispersed among more than 100 different entities of the Federal Government. America needs a unified homeland security structure that 

will improve protection against today’s threats and be flexible 

enough to help meet the unknown threats of the future. 

The mission of the new Department would be to prevent terrorist 

attacks within the United States, to reduce America’s vulnerability 

to terrorism, and to minimize the damage and recover from attacks 

that may occur. The Department of Homeland Security would mobilize and focus the resources of the Federal Government, State 

and local governments, the private sector, and the American people 

to accomplish its mission. 

The Department of Homeland Security would make Americans 

safer because for the first time we would have one department 

dedicated to securing the homeland. One department would secure 

our borders, transportation sector, ports, and critical infrastructure. One department would analyze homeland security intelligence 

from multiple sources, synthesize it with a comprehensive assessment of America’s vulenrabilities, and take action to secure our 

highest risk facilities and systems. One department would coordinate communications with State and local governments, private industry, and the American people about threats and preparedness. 

One department would coordinate our efforts to secure the American people against bioterrorism and other weapons of mass destruction. One department would help train and equip our first responders. One department would manage Federal emergency response activities. 

Our goal is not to expand Government, but to create an agile organization that takes advantage of modern technology and management techniques to meet a new and constantly evolving threat. We 

can improve our homeland security by minimizing the duplication 

of efforts, improving coordination, and combining functions that are 

currently fragmented and inefficient. The new Department would 

allow us to have more security officers in the field working to stop 

3

terrorists and fewer resources in Washington managing duplicative 

activities that drain critical homeland security resources. 

The Department of Homeland Security would have a clear and 

efficient organizational structure with four main divisions: Border 

and Transportation Security; Emergency Preparedness and Response; Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Countermeasures; and Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection. 

Border and Transportation Security 

Terrorism is a global threat and we must improve our border security to help keep out those who mean to do us harm. We must 

closely monitor who is coming into and out of our country to help 

prevent foreign terrorists from entering our country and bringing 

in their instruments of terror. At the same time, we must expedite 

the legal flow of people and goods on which our economy depends. 

Securing our borders and controlling entry to the United States has 

always been the responsibility of the Federal Government. Yet, this 

responsibility and the security of our transportation systems is now 

dispersed among several major Government organizations. Under 

my proposed legislation, the Department of Homeland Security 

would unify authority over major Federal security operations related to our borders, territorial waters, and transportation systems. 

The Department would assume responsibility for the United 

States Coast Guard, the United States Customs Service, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (including the Border Patrol), 

the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, and the Transportation Security Administration. The Secretary of Homeland Security would have the authority to administer and enforce all immigration and nationality laws, including the visa issuance functions 

of consular officers. As a result, the Department would have sole 

responsibility for managing entry into the United States and protecting our transportation infrastructure. It would ensure that all 

aspects of border control, including the issuing of visas, are informed by a central information-sharing clearinghouse and compatible databases. 

Emergency Preparedness and Response 

Although our top priority is preventing future attacks, we must 

also prepare to minimize the damage and recover from attacks that 

may occur. 

My legislative proposal requires the Department of Homeland 

Security to ensure the preparedness of our Nation’s emergency response professionals, provide the Federal Government’s response, 

and aid America’s recovery from terrorist attacks and natural disasters. To fulfill these missions, the Department of Homeland Security would incorporate the Federal Emergency Management Agency 

(FEMA) as one of its key components. The Department would administer the domestic disaster preparedness grant programs for 

firefighters, police, and emergency personnel currently managed by 

FEMA, the Department of Justice, and the Department of Health 

and Human Services. In responding to an incident, the Department 

would manage such critical response assets as the Nuclear Emergency Search Team (from the Department of Energy) and the National Pharmaceutical Stockpile (from the Department of Health 

4

and Human Services). Finally, the Department of Homeland Security would integrate the Federal interagency emergency response 

plans into a single, comprehensive, Government-wide plan, and 

would work to ensure that all response personnel have the equipment and capability to communicate with each other as necessary. 

Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Countermeasures 

Our enemies today seek to acquire and use the most deadly 

weapons known to mankind—chemical, biological, radiological, and 

nuclear weapons. 

The new Department of Homeland Security would lead the Federal Government’s efforts in preparing for and responding to the 

full range of terrorist threats involving weapons of mass destruction. The Department would set national policy and establish 

guidelines for State and local governments. The Department would 

direct exercises for Federal, State, and local chemical, biological, 

radiological, and nuclear attack response teams and plans. The Department would consolidate and synchronize the disparate efforts 

of multiple Federal agencies now scattered across several departments. This would create a single office whose primary mission is 

the critical task of securing the United States from catastrophic 

terrorism. 

The Department would improve America’s ability to develop 

diagnostics, vaccines, antibodies, antidotes, and other countermeasures against new weapons. It would consolidate and prioritize 

the disparate homeland security-related research and development 

programs currently scattered throughout the executive branch, and 

the Department would assist State and local public safety agencies 

by evaluating equipment and setting standards. 

Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection 

For the first time the Government would have under one roof the 

capability to identify and assess threats to the homeland, map 

those threats against our vulnerabilities, issue timely warnings, 

and take action to help secure the homeland. 

The Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection division 

of the new Department of Homeland Security would complement 

the reforms on intelligence-gathering and information-sharing already underway at the FBI and the CIA. The Department would 

analyze information and intelligence from the FBI, CIA, and many 

other Federal agencies to better understand the terrorist threat to 

the American homeland. 

The Department would comprehensively assess the vulnerability 

of America’s key assets and critical infrastructures, including food 

and water systems, agriculture, health systems and emergency 

services, information and telecommunications, banking and finance, energy, transportation, the chemical and defense industries, 

postal and shipping entities, and national monuments and icons. 

The Department would integrate its own and others’ threat analyses with its comprehensive vulnerability assessment to identify 

protective priorities and support protective steps to be taken by the 

Department, other Federal departments and agencies, State and 

local agencies, and the private sector. Working closely with State 

and local officials, other Federal agencies, and the private sector, 

5

the Department would help ensure that proper steps are taken to 

protect high-risk potential targets. 

Other Components 

In addition to these four core divisions, the submitted legislation 

would also transfer responsibility for the Secret Service to the Department of Homeland Security. The Secret Service, which would 

report directly to the Secretary of Homeland Security, would retain 

its primary mission to protect the President and other Government 

Leaders. The Secret Service would, however, contribute its specialized protective expertise to the fulfillment of the Department’s core 

mission. 

Finally, under my legislation, the Department of Homeland Security would consolidate and streamline relations with the Federal 

Government for America’s State and local governments. The new 

Department would contain an intergovernmental affairs office to 

coordinate Federal homeland security programs with State and 

local officials. It would give State and local officials one primary 

contact instead of many when it comes to matters related to training, equipment, planning, and other critical needs such as emergency response. 

The consolidation of the Government’s homeland security efforts 

as outlined in my proposed legislation can achieve great efficiencies 

that further enhance our security. Yet, to achieve these efficiencies, 

the new Secretary of Homeland Security would require considerable flexibility in procurement, integration of information technology systems, and personnel issues. My proposed legislation provides the Secretary of Homeland Security with just such flexibility 

and managerial authorities. I call upon the Congress to implement 

these measures in order to ensure that we are maximizing our ability to secure our homeland. 

Continued Interagency Coordination at the White House 

Even with the creation of the new Department, there will remain 

a strong need for a White House Office of Homeland Security. Protecting America from terrorism will remain a multi-departmental 

issue and will continue to require interagency coordination. Presidents will continue to require the confidential advice of a Homeland Security Advisor, and I intend for the White House Office of 

Homeland Security and the Homeland Security Council to maintain a strong role in coordinating our governmentwide efforts to secure the homeland. 

The Lessons of History 

History teaches us that new challenges require new organizational structures. History also teaches us that critical security challenges require clear lines of responsibility and the unified effort of 

the U.S. Government. 

President Truman said, looking at the lessons of the Second 

World War: ‘‘It is now time to discard obsolete organizational 

forms, and to provide for the future the soundest, the most effective, and the most economical kind of structure for our armed 

forces.’’ When skeptics told President Truman that this proposed 

reorganization was too ambitious to be enacted, he simply replied 

6

that it had to be. In the years to follow, the Congress acted upon 

President Truman’s recommendation, eventually laying a sound organizational foundation that enabled the United States to win the 

Cold War. All Americans today enjoy the inheritance of this landmark organizational reform: a unified Department of Defense that 

has become the most powerful force for freedom the world has ever 

seen. 

Today America faces a threat that is wholly different from the 

threat we faced during the Cold War. Our terrorist enemies hide 

in shadows and attack civilians with whatever means of destruction they can access. But as in the Cold War, meeting this threat 

requires clear lines of responsibility and the unified efforts of government at all levels—Federal, State, local, and tribal—the private 

sector, and all Americans. America needs a homeland security establishment that can help prevent catastrophic attacks and mobilize national resources for an enduring conflict while protecting our 

Nation’s values and liberties. 

Years from today, our world will still be fighting the threat of 

terrorism. It is my hope that future generations will be able to look 

back on the Homeland Security Act of 2002—as we now remember 

the National Security Act of 1947—as the solid organizational foundation for America’s triumph in a long and difficult struggle 

against a formidable enemy. 

History has given our Nation new challenges—and important 

new assignments. Only the United States Congress can create a 

new department of Government. We face an urgent need, and I am 

pleased that Congress has responded to my call to act before the 

end of the current congressional session with the same bipartisan 

spirit that allowed us to act expeditiously on legislation after September 11. 

These are times that demand bipartisan action and bipartisan 

solutions to meet the new and changing threats we face as a Nation. I urge the Congress to join me in creating a single, permanent 

department with an overriding and urgent mission—securing the 

homeland of America and protecting the American people. Together 

we can meet this ambitious deadline and help ensure that the 

American homeland is secure against the terrorist threat.

GEORGE W. BUSH. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, June 18, 2002. 

(7)


Insert offset folio 11 HD227.001
8


Insert offset folio 12 HD227.002
9


Insert offset folio 13 HD227.003
10


Insert offset folio 14 HD227.004
11


Insert offset folio 15 HD227.005
12


Insert offset folio 16 HD227.006
13


Insert offset folio 17 HD227.007
14


Insert offset folio 18 HD227.008
15


Insert offset folio 19 HD227.009
16


Insert offset folio 20 HD227.010
17


Insert offset folio 21 HD227.011
18


Insert offset folio 22 HD227.012
19


Insert offset folio 23 HD227.013
20


Insert offset folio 24 HD227.014
21


Insert offset folio 25 HD227.015
22


Insert offset folio 26 HD227.016
23


Insert offset folio 27 HD227.017
24


Insert offset folio 28 HD227.018
25


Insert offset folio 29 HD227.019
26


Insert offset folio 30 HD227.020
27


Insert offset folio 31 HD227.021
28


Insert offset folio 32 HD227.022
29


Insert offset folio 33 HD227.023
30


Insert offset folio 34 HD227.024
31


Insert offset folio 35 HD227.025
32


Insert offset folio 36 HD227.026
33


Insert offset folio 37 HD227.027
34


Insert offset folio 38 HD227.028
35


Insert offset folio 39 HD227.029
36


Insert offset folio 40 HD227.030
37


Insert offset folio 41 HD227.031
38


Insert offset folio 42 HD227.032
39


Insert offset folio 43 HD227.033
40


Insert offset folio 44 HD227.034
41


Insert offset folio 45 HD227.035
42


Insert offset folio 46 HD227.036
43


Insert offset folio 47 HD227.037
44


Insert offset folio 48 HD227.038
45


Insert offset folio 49 HD227.039
46


Insert offset folio 50 HD227.040
47


Insert offset folio 51 HD227.041
48


Insert offset folio 52 HD227.042
49


Insert offset folio 53 HD227.043
50


Insert offset folio 54 HD227.044
51


Insert offset folio 55 HD227.045
52


Insert offset folio 56 HD227.046
53


Insert offset folio 57 HD227.047
54


Insert offset folio 58 HD227.048
55


Insert offset folio 59 HD227.049
56


Insert offset folio 60 HD227.050
57


Insert offset folio 61 HD227.051