alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report of Brigham Exploration Company
(the"Company")  on  Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Ben M.Brigham,  President,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chairman of the
Board of the Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:


     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Date: November 12, 2003                  /s/ Bud M. Brigham
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         Bud M. Brigham
                                         President, Chief Executive Officer, and
                                         Chairman of the Board



     This certification shall not be deemed to be "filed" for the purpose of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be
incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as
being incorporated therein by reference.

          A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Brigham
Exploration Company and will be retained by Brigham Exploration Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case No. COMP/M.3452 APAX/PCM UITGEVERS NV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2004/C 147/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

(2)OJ C 217, 29.7.2000, p. 32; Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 has been replaced by Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

----
Exhibit 32(a)








This Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in such filing.








Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title 18 of the United States Code








In connection with the Annual Report of Columbus Southern Power Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K (the “Report”) for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael G. Morris, the chief executive officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Michael G. Morris


Michael G. Morris


Chief Executive Officer








February 24, 2011








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NAVCENT Launches Saildrone in Gulf of Aqaba for Exercise Digital Horizon
 
  By 5th Fleet Public Affairs - NAVCENT
  U.S. Naval Forces Central Command (NAVCENT) began operationally testing a new unmanned surface vessel (USV) in the Gulf of Aqaba, Dec. 12, as part of an initiative to integrate new unmanned systems and artificial intelligence into U.S. 5th Fleet operations.
NAVCENT commenced exercise Digital Horizon while launching a Saildrone Explorer USV into the water for the first time from the Royal Jordanian naval base in Aqaba, Jordan. Last month, U.S. and Jordanian naval leaders announced the base would become a joint hub for Saildrone operations in the Red Sea.
“These are exciting times for Task Force 59 as we team with the Royal Jordanian Navy to establish our hub for Red Sea operations in Aqaba and deploy some of our new maritime robotics,” said Capt. Michael Brasseur, commander of NAVCENT’s new task force for unmanned systems and artificial intelligence.
The Saildrone Explorer is a 23-foot-long, 16-foot-tall USV reliant on wind power for propulsion. The vessel houses a package of sensors powered through solar energy for building a shared picture of the surrounding seas.
“Our Saildrones leverage machine learning and artificial intelligence to enhance maritime domain awareness, extending the digital horizon with a sustainable, zero-carbon solution,” said Brasseur.
After establishing Task Force 59 in September, NAVCENT is in the early stages of integrating unmanned systems and artificial intelligence into the U.S. 5th Fleet operational environment.
In October, the task force integrated and evaluated new MANTAS T-12 USVs alongside crewed ships in the Arabian Gulf during exercise New Horizon. On Dec. 4, the task force initiated at-sea operational tests for a MANTAS T-38 USV off the coast of Bahrain.
Ongoing evaluations of new unmanned systems in U.S. 5th Fleet help drive discovery, innovation and fleet integration. The U.S. Navy is learning important lessons that will inform future operational employment.
The Middle East region's unique geography, climate, and strategic importance offer an ideal environment for unmanned innovation through multilateral collaboration. The area includes the world's largest standing maritime partnership, Arabian Gulf, Red Sea, Gulf of Oman and parts of the Indian Ocean.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 386 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 11, 2002.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill 
(H.R. 3762) to amend title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 
1974 and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide additional protections to 
participants and beneficiaries in individual account plans from excessive 
investment in employer securities and to promote the provision of retirement 
investment advice to workers managing their retirement income assets, and to 
amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prohibit insider trades during any 
suspension of the ability of plan participants or beneficiaries to direct 
investment away from equity securities of the plan sponsor. The bill shall be 
considered as read for amendment. In lieu of the amendment recommended by the 
Committee on Education and the Workforce now printed in the bill, the amendment 
in the nature of a substitute printed in part A of the report of the Committee 
on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted. All points 
of order against the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall 
be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment 
thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) two hours of 
debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided among and controlled by the 
chairmen and ranking minority members of the Committees on Education and the 
Workforce and Ways and Means; (2) the further amendment printed in part B of the 
report of the Committee on Rules, if offered by Representative George Miller of 
California or Representative Rangel of New York or a designee, which shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order, shall be considered as read, 
and shall be separately debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by 
the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Hillsborough,)

Oct. 1, 1912.

#### Dewey *v.*Noyes, *Ex’x.*

Where the nature and amount of a claim against the estate of a deceased person have been fully explained to the executor, who flatly refuses to pay, the creditor may maintain an action thereon without the formal exhibition and demand required by section 1, chapter 191, Public Statutes.

Assumpsit, to recover for board and nursing furnished to the defendant’s testator. Transferred from the January term, 1912, of the superior court by *Chamberlin,*J., on the plaintiff’s exception to an order of nonsuit.

*Thorp & Abbott (Mr. Thorp*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Jesse B. Pattee*and *Burnham, Brown, Jones & Warren (Robert L. Manning*orally), for the defendant.

Bingham, J.

This action is brought by the plaintiff to recover a sum claimed to be due her for boarding and nursing the defendant’s testator. The questions presented arise on the plaintiff’s exception to an order of the superior court directing a nonsuit, upon the ground that the evidence submitted by the plaintiff would not warrant a finding that payment of the claim had been demanded of the defendant before the suit was brought.

By section 1, chapter 191, Public Statutes, it is provided that “no action shall be sustained against an administrator . . . unless the demand has been exhibited to the administrator and payment has been demanded.” Under this statute, it has been held that “a claim against the estate of a person deceased may be presented in any form which brings the nature and amount of it distinctly to the notice of the administrator”; that a written statement is not essential so long as the nature and amount of the claim are made known to him. *Ayer*v. *Chadwick,*66 N. H. 385. And although the statute contemplates that before suit is brought the creditor or his authorized agent shall in person demand payment of the administrator, so that he may at once discharge the claim *(Cummings*v. *Farnham,*75 N. H. 135; *Ross*v. *Knox,*71 N. H. 249), still it is held that the demand may be waived by the administrator’s denial of all liability when the claim is presented, *494or by his absolute refusal to pay it at that or any other time. This; is for the reason that no other reasonable deduction can be made from the conduct of the parties. *Jaffrey*v. *Smith, ante,*168, 172,. 174.

In this case there was evidence that shortly after the defendant’s-appointment as executrix she called at the office of the attorney for the plaintiff, who had charge of the claim in suit, and inquired, what it was about; that the attorney explained fully to her the-nature and amount of the claim, and received the reply that she would not pay the plaintiff for any claim or matter whatsoever and that it would do no good to put a statement of it in writing-for her. In view of this evidence, it is unnecessary to consider the other, evidence in the case, as this was of itself sufficient to> entitle the plaintiff to go to the jury upon the issue in question.

*Exception sustained.*

All concurred.
#### CLIFTON et al. v. CREIGHTON-McSHANE OIL CO.†

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 19, 1912.)

No. 2,171.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Texas.

H. N. Atkinson, W. D. Gordon, D. F. Rowe, Harris Masterson, and F. B. Stanley, for appellants.

Leon Sonfield, Walter J. Crawford, and Stuart R. Smith, for appellee.

Before PARDEE and SHELBY, Circuit Judges, and MAXEY, District Judge.

†

 Rehearing denied April 13, 1912.

PER CURIAM.

A majority of the judges find no reversible error in the rulings of the court below in refusing to grant the writ of injunction prayed for, or in sustaining the demurrers and dismissing the original and amended bills of complaint. The decree appealed from is affirmed.
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the filing of the annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") by FCCC, Inc. (the "Registrant"), I, Bernard Zimmerman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.





| | /s/Bernard ZimmermanName: Bernard Zimmerman
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: June 25, 2004
## u.s. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

# REcEIvED JUN- 52013
IN THE MATTER OF: WORLDWIDE AIRCRAFT SERVICES, INC. OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, D. C. 

## HEARING DOCKET 

# I DOCKETNO. FAA-2013-0045 FAA CASENO. 2009S0150216 Judge J.E. Sullivan Respondent
Joint Section 13.217/Rule26(f) Report Submitted by ComplainantFAA

. 

### .' 1. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.217 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f), a teleconference was held on May 30, 2013, and was attended by (1) William P. Vines, counsel for Complainant, and (2) Michael A. Honeycutt for the Respondent. 2. The parties have agreedto and recommend the following discovery plan: a. The parties will exchange the discovery disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(l) by Friday, June 28, 2013; b. Initial discovery requests will be made byFriday, July 26, 2013. The parties will have until August 26, 2013, to respond to initial discoveryrequests; c. Follow-up discovery requests will be made by Friday, September 6, 2013. The parties have until September 30, 2013, to respond to follow-up discovery requests; d. All dispositive motions must be filed byOctober 15, 2013; responses thereto by Nown1ber 1, 2013; replies byNovember 15, 2013; e. The hearing shouldbe held inTampa, Florida. :.1 ·,n

' y '•'" • '

### 3. Settlement has not been discussed, as the Respondent, by way ofMr. Honeycutt, has represented to the Complainant that the Respondent would like to appeal the Administrator's allegations and violations for review by an Administrative Law Judge.

I "/ ,)4._ ll 

### Respectivelysubmittedthis 2 (} , day of 

### I 

### !\PiUJ

I ,i I / 

### _L.---· J .i**/~ -""---~---~-"--**  !v;· \... J '2013. J 

### William Vines Counsel for Complainant

2
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 165 (Monday, August 28, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 58631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18510]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12163]


U.S. Department of State Advisory Committee on Private 
International Law: Public Meeting on the Hague Conference on Private 
International Law (HCCH), Eighth Meeting Special Commission on 
Practical Operations 1980 Child Abduction Convention

    The Department of State's Advisory Committee on Private 
International Law (ACPIL) will hold a virtual meeting to discuss the 
Hague Special Commission on the Eighth Meeting of the Practical 
Operation on the 1980 Child Abduction Convention on September 12, 2023. 
The meeting will be held in WebEx. The program is scheduled to run from 
1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time.
    The meeting will discuss the reports and documents completed 
concerning the Practical Operations of the 1980 Child Abduction 
Convention and 1996 Child Protection Convention regarding the 
feasibility of one or more private international law instruments. The 
purpose of the public meeting is to obtain the views of concerned 
stakeholders on the matters presented in the relevant documents, which 
will be made available by the HCCH at https://www.hcch.net/en/publications-and-studies/details4/?pid=8488&dtid=57.
    Members of the public may attend this virtual session and will be 
permitted to participate in the discussion. Virtual attendance is 
limited to 100 persons, so each member of the public that wishes to 
attend this session must provide: Name, contact information, and 
affiliation to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#25554c496556514451400b424a53"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2151484d6152554055440f464e57">[email protected]</span></a>, not later than September 8, 2023. When 
you register, please indicate whether you require captioning. The WebEx 
site and agenda will be forwarded to individuals who register. Requests 
made after that date will be considered but might not be able to be 
fulfilled.

Karin Kizer,
Attorney-Adviser, Office of Private International Law, Office of the 
Legal Adviser, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2023-18510 Filed 8-25-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CERTIFICATIONS*



EXHIBIT 10.17



CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.

1600 SMITH ST.

HOUSTON, TEXAS  77002


March 12, 2004


Mr. Jeffery A. Smisek

Executive Vice President

Continental Airlines, Inc.

1600 Smith St., Dept. HQSEO

Houston, TX  77002


Dear Mr. Smisek:


The purpose of this letter agreement is to amend your employment agreement with Continental Airlines, Inc. (the "Company") to take into account the March 12, 2004 amendment to the definition of "Change in Control" in the Company's various employee benefit plans and programs, including the Incentive Plan 2000 and the Long Term Incentive Performance Award Program.  The definition of Change in Control was amended to delete references to certain Excluded Persons and to update those individuals who comprise the Incumbent Board, all as such terms are used in the Change in Control definition.  The Company has provided you a copy of the amended Change in Control definition.


You and the Company agree that your current employment agreement is amended so that all references therein to "Change in Control" refer to such amended "Change in Control" definition.   


If you agree with the foregoing, please sign the enclosed copy of this letter agreement and return the enclosed copy to me, whereby this letter agreement shall be a binding agreement between you and the Company and shall amend your current employment agreement accordingly.


Sincerely,


/s/ Michael H. Campbell


Michael H. Campbell

Senior Vice President - Human

Resources and Labor Relations


Agreed:


/s/ Jeffery A. Smisek______

Jeffery A. Smisek
99–008

107TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 107–611

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE SENATE AMENDMENT TO THE

BILL H.R. 4546, DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003

JULY 25 (legislative day of JULY 24), 2002.—Referred to the House Calendar and

ordered to be printed

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

R E P O R T

[To accompany H. Res. 500]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 500, by a non-record vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides that upon adoption of the rule H.R. 4546,

with the Senate amendment, shall be taken from the Speaker’s

table and is hereby agreed to with an amendment, consisting of the

text of H.R. 4546, as passed by the House and the text of H.R.

4547, as passed by the House.

The rule further provides that the House shall be considered to

have insisted on its amendment to the Senate amendment and to

have requested a conference thereon.

Æ
# THE ATTORNEY 

# GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN. TEXAS 78711
May 5. 1975 The Honorable James E. Peavy M. D. Commissioner Texas Department ofHealth Austin, Texas 78756 Dear Commissioner Peavy: Opinion No. H-600 Re: Conditions under which a minor may donate blood.
You have requested our opinion regarding the conditions under which a person under the age of 18years ofage may volunteer to donate blood with parental consent.

Pursuant to section 12.04 ofthe Family Code, the parent ofa minor is granted:

(6) the power to consent to . . . medical, psychiatric, and surgical treatment. Section ‘35.01 specifies certain persons who may “consent to medical treatment ofa minor” when the consent ofa parent cannot be obtained.

Although it is doubtful that the donation ofblood may be semantically embraced within the ambit of “medical treatment, ” we believe an examination ofthat section Withsection 35.03 ofthe Family Code indicates that the Legislature intended toinclude the donation ofblood within the term “medical treatment. ” Section 35.03 provides in part: Sec. 35.03. Consent to Treatment byMinor (a)A minor may consent to the furnishing of hospital, medical, surgical, and dental care by a licensed physician or dentist if the minor:

. . . .
p. 2665- -

The Honorable James E. Peavy page 2 (H-600)
(5) is 18years ofage or older and consents to the donation ofhis blood and the penetration oftissue necessary toaccomplish the donation;

. . . . (b) Consent by a minor tohospital, medical, surgical, or dental treatment under this section ii not subject to disaffirmance because ofminority,

. . . . (fjA physician, dentist, hospital, or medical facility may rely onthe written statement ofthe minor containing the grounds onwhich the minor has Capacity to consent tohis own medical treatment under this section. (Emphasis added). The c,lear implication of section 35.03 is that the donation of blood alluded toin subsection (a)(5) is included within the scope of “medical . . . care” (subsection a) and within the scope of “medical . . . treatment” (subsections band f). Consequently, we believe that the donation ofblood may be included within the definition of “medical treatment” for purposes of sections 12.04 and 35.01. Itis therefore our opinion that a minor may volunteer to donate blood with parental consent. SUMMARY A minor may volunteer to donate blood with the consent ofa parent or pursuant to the terms of section 35.01 ofthe Family Code. Jery truly yours, 

# u Attorney General of Texas p. 2666.- -

The Honorable James E. Peavy page 3 (H-600)

APPROVED:
DAVID M. KENDALL, First Assistant

C. ROBERT HEATH, Chairman Opinion Committee

p. 2667
---

---

Exhibit 23.11

CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Forms S-8, (File No.
333-61895, File No. 333-55970) and Forms S-3,( File No. 333-140968 , File No. 333-140969
and , File No. 333-140974) of our report dated March 27, 2006 relating to the financial
statements of Ophirtech Ltds 2005 Annual report to shareholders, which appears in
this Form 10-K of Ampal  American Israel Corporation .

Kesselman & Kesselman CPAs (ISR) A member of Pricewaterhouse Coopers International Limited

Tel-Aviv, Israel
13 March , 2008



---

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 385

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 385.1013 Petitions for rescission.

A motor carrier may submit a petition for rescission of an order suspending or revoking registration under this subpart by following the procedures set forth in § 385.915.