simulations do not provide a theater-level simulation system, compatible with current

simulation suites that replicate a Major Theater of War scenario.

d. ARNG and USAR Force Support Package Units.

• Manpower. Shortfalls in FTS manning limit operations and training management.

Sustaining DMOSQ impacted by limited school spaces for low density MOS. Some

MOS require extensive training (11M, 19K, 13B, 13F, 31, and 63H) and sequential

schools require a soldier's absence from their civilian employment for extended periods.

• Equipment. Some FSP units have equipment that is incompatible their active

counterparts. This creates problems, especially with command and control, during

training. Several FSP units will have to acquire needed force modernization equipment

at the mobilization station.

• Training. Some Equipment Readiness Code-A equipment shortages inhibit effective

training. Units will require additional training time after mobilization to achieve

proficiency on collective tasks. Limited funds and/or limited days available for training

generally cause soldiers to attend either Annual Training or DMOSQ schools. Distance

to training areas and facilities further erodes available training time.

e. The results of the validation by the commander of that associated active-duty unit of the

compatibility of that National Guard or U.S. Army Reserve unit with active duty forces

in accordance with section 1131(b)(4) of ANGCRRA.

• Detailed validations are maintained by the Department of the Army, Office of the

Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations, Training Division.

• For ARNG divisions and eSBs, Single Channel Ground and Airborne Radio System

and Mobile Subscriber Equipment connectivity is the foremost compatibility issue.

As MTOE changes and unit reorganizations continue, compatibility will improve.

• ARNG and USAR FSP unit equipment shortages resulting from reorganizations and

MTOE changes affect compatibility the most. Nonstandard software systems in these

units affect both the Standard Installation Division Personnel System and the Unit

Level Logistics System. Corresponding systems between components are frequently

very different. Most FSP units will not be fully compatible with AC units until after

mobilization.

21. A specification of the active-duty personnel assigned to units of the Selected Reserve pursuant

to section 414(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993

(10 U.S.C. 261 note), shown (A) by State for the Army National Guard and RSC/GOCOM

for the U.S. Army Reserve, (b) by rank of officers, warrant officers, and enlisted members

assigned, and (c) by unit or other organizational entity of assignment.

23
	
	
		 

  	

   











	








	














 
 
 


 



 !	












""#










 
 	

 $
%
 
 









&





  



     
 '

(























)







	



	
	
		 

 0	
		
	/
)
<	.	


,		
	
'")')
-
		,	

7
,
		/


	***5

8 

		


$,	
)%	
$,
!
		%,	)-

$.	

*: 
)
	/	
)	
	
"	
	


'!C$'	
	
'.)	

	,		
	


"	
,	-		
				
'-




,	.			*F	?)	-
/
>,		


		
	/
)
-,	5

 

	

,	H

 #		
	
-
,	H

 

	
,H

 
	.
	

,	)
-
,	<		


,
	/



,	)	
	
	

-,	)
		




		.

	&	,
,		
,	)	%,	'.
	/

,	.	0&
	
'"	&
	
'-

3	/,	.	
,	-7
		



	
'"'$	'"
/,		

'
'!C$'

8 $
-&E*)'".#,		
>.,	


	
-
	

.#,		
,,	>@?:

,	
-
).-;*,
0
#,		


	-		)

.	.
,	/	

,	./
,C-'
	,		
#,	

.
,	7
	
,	#%,	'

.
	$	&0
.
,	/

7
*::+$.

-3	134

	.-	.
	

3
..
,	7
	

.-	

8 
'.!	1'!4	
%-A	

#,		-1%#4,		'!C$-


,	/


	
	
		 

>,)/-

-
)


 	.	


	/	,	

	,	.	-

-./
		
,)

,	)/	
.


	9.-	.		


 	**,*	



7
	,		..


<		#
-)**

,,	./
-		
	



)/-			

-.	
	
	.

,
	

/.


)7
,,)

		
---	.	

	- /		



7
)//,	A	-


,.	->-
)

-
-	
	)/-


/-	


		


	)		-


		
)

	)

,		-	)	
-

	
	)	

"	
-, 	
.
		


		
-	
,	.-		)

)
		


),	9	),	.

/-		,			


	/
.)	<

/	/	//
	





		
-	




-
--)
--

.<		 	.)

	,	-	.)


	

,	/,	


-		,	),
/


--,	-	2

	#
)


		
-	
/
		


		

,	.
>	.

	
.

%	*)	.	

,	,		),	
9	

	)
.,,%,	

"$'#"&'$%3
-



		,	
-	


,/>.

-


	/	 /
			

	-,	/

-

-	 )
)

,		


	

	
	

			/2		
,,	-
/	)


,	.
	9		)

)
,,)
.

,,	
	




,,	.	-


!
)	
*)	

,	2	-,	 )	

	A 

	
-

	

-

-	
)7


	-	
	-	/-2



--	-
)

-



	,	)
-
	

0)!
),	-	

,,


	)
	
	-

		
,,		
	


.	**,*)



*,		3

$
	!.
,,		

.

	;)

.,	*F


	
	
		 

8 
B/*D2*@)$.)(##)	+D14)&*)*::@),	

***+	"!''

*? 

	)
,-	
	
,)	
"	


)
	/	
)

	)
,-	
	


,)	
'.
	/	
'!C$')/
	
/

-
-
,.	
,	.	***+	"!''

8 
B/*D2*@)$.)(##)	+D14)&*)*::@),	

***+	"!''

*D 

	)
,-	
	
,)	
"	


)
	/	
)

	)
,-		

'.

,)	
'.)
	/	
'!C$')	.


-	D/
	
/
,
>	
-
,.	
	

,
,			***+	"!''

8 
B/*D2*@)$.)(##)	+D14)&*)*::@),	

***+	"!''

*F 

	
	
"	
)	
'.)




	,	
.		A	)	
	
)




	,		/
	***;	"!''

8 
B/*D2*@)$.)(##)	+D14)&*)*::@),	

***;	"!''

*@ 
,	2	A	-	
"	
	

&
)'.&
),	),	-	

	"	

)
'!C%!%3	'.


)	/
-/	
		,
	"	
	

!&
)'.
),	2	A	,		,
,			

***:	"!''

 	,		A	-,	
	
-


',	)

)
$,	
)%	
$,


!
		%,	)&	'$.	

 #			
,	-7


-,		A	


!	1!%"4

 		A	-	
,0-104-	A


.) )),	
	)-
"0!


	
	
		 

	)
		-	/.	,


,)
		)
	

	  	
	
"	H,	,

	
7
	
	),	.

	
/-		
	


).	,	


	



	
	,		

,	/->,	

//
,		


		
	
	
-


		
--


,	,-.-

		

		
9		


/	<



	



!


	,	,

	/

>	,	

7
 		,
--

	,	7




,,	
,	/
-.

	/#1&E4)/

,,	-	


*,-/
.		


)
,	->,&E*

&E	
,	-




-	

-

	&ED


'"'	/ 
,	
F

,	
<	

%-	-

>,.-	.2

	
&

,,	2
.

.
	

,		,	

/,	


/.-,-*2

	%2
/.

	,		

.*

,	-			,	


-		
	

	/	

/



7
,	)/	
	

>	..
-	

,	-



> 	


/-		
	,%

,

	
/
	2	).))


2	/
	.


"	
/-		

/
K7
	)K

>,	

	
	,
-	,	

>-7
	.,	-

- 
,,	


/	 -/

%	


	$	,	.'#!'		

,	.		)

)		
		


	,	-,/	


.	%
	,,)	


	
A)	

,,	
,

	,	F,


?@,	
./
	
,,	


-,	
-
 

	2-	)


		.
	

,	-)
,--2	 

	



,,	

-
/-	

	/-	,

. 	

	
	#
)
		

	</-,




,	,%
	 


)

9
-
"	<

		
	// 

	

#	

/
		


	
	
		 

"!''		
"	
/
	.		,



-7
	,		/
		
/	.	,	

.
A-,	
			/&E		
		


'/
	.		,

-7
	,		/
	

	
/	.	,	5

 #&E*)

	'"	2,	,	/5DF)F?:
"	


0

1"04
		

 
' 
.-))7
,)

>,/
,	.,			,		

	-,		./


		
.

-7
		!	7
)	
	

-	.	,	/

''		

		/
	>
 
			,	)	,	.



		
	
-
	
-)-)
	,		

		,	,	-

"		.1"4'
/			#$

/
+	"
#''
#$/


*;	"

	A	,	

		,	-,	.'@*2F),-,
?2D

	/
				,
3%-	/



/7
	,-	7
	3%


'
	1'@*2*4


 -	/	/
	.		,-	

	


--			/
	/-
,	0-

!-	<<
		/
	.	,0-)


	
'
)	//-	.#.
-

	!-	<=<
		--!-	

<&</


		


		/
		K,	K			

 	#	


,	/
	-
		
	2,	


: 

		
"	
)
	/	
)
/


-
-
,.	
,

	***F141*4	"!''		

	,-

-7
	,	/
D	
-


"	
.
A-,	
			/&E*	


--	
'/
	.		,

-7


	,	/
D	
	-
'



	
	
		 

/	.	-/	 2/

,)	
	/	,/
.

-,	)-



.	-
>

		/	.	



)
,-


,	-	-
	-

----	,	)

-)>,	.)

.	/
,
,	-/



	
-.	-

--

,,	

	
5-,


)
>,		
	)

,
	
),	)

7
)	)
-	/
/

		

	/
/)

	-A	

)/		


.
,
	,	,)

	
-

)	-

/
.-.
)



	

/.


	-
	2

	/
	
,		-
/

		/
-

	/-
- 





#	,	.
	)

-
,,	),	/,	9	

,		




/
	.))	/






	
		/)/.

,
,/	
	.L	&	

		)




	-2		



		-

	,	H

)/	/
.2

	.-/	 -
2

!	
/	2


	


			,		


-,	

	,
	
9	

.
)'		)

3	A	1'34&E/
,

,	.	
			

	

-

%.
>

.)'3
	/	
	

,,	>L?	

	

	
-->-

	





	




/
		

	,-
-


	,/

-	
/-
-

,
-		
	

>/
		

-
,A			


$,	$<-		@+

*
.-	

	
>-

,.A	.&	>,)/

,A-	

	
'

!	
#.>,-


,	-	D,	9		

.-	

	,-	.@?)
	
-


)
,	-	/
,.		

	)
)-	
-	

		,	.
7
	
-

	
	
.#

&E?)//
A

	-	-A	
/

,	.	





	
-
	
-


,		
7
.	

	,	.
.


	
-
	,	,

-	A	



	
	
		 




* 

,-		/
/		.2
		-

	
"	
	
'.'.


 "	
1'"4	5*)?	F;?,

 '.1'4	5)D:D	@,

 

,-	,	/
/		.2


		-	
"	
	
'.

'.


 '"5*D;)+*	D+,

 '5F+)F*	?F,

? 

		/
	-
			
./

	.
	
	,		
.2
.	-	%
	

	

 

/
	.-
-,		
.2
.	-	

	
'.,

		***141*4	"!''5

8 #&E*)F	/	
..		,
	-	

 

	/
	/./-

	***1414	

"!'')	-
/

		
/.5

8 #&E*)*/.)		)/-
	


D 

		/
	/		-

'.%<-

!	,-
/	.
	
	,		
.2


.	-	5

8 #&E*)D'%!$3-
/		,-
.


.	-	

%
		

 

/
	.-
-,		
.2
.	-	

	
'.,

		***141*4	"!''5

8 #&E*)D/	$-	'"		,
	-	

 

	/
	/./-

	***1414	

"!'')	-
/

		
/.5


	
	
		 

!	-

	

	

	)
/,	



,	
.	)
,

,		
-
		


-
	)


,	

		,		
,

	,		2	,-		/	



	
			

/
2)		

.)	
	
/	


		 .-	/

,,	
		,		,

,	/


		-	..	-A	


,/	--

	,,	
		/,	.

.	
..-	

.-	.,	.



"	<
,
7


	-	
	/	


.	
	-,		

.-	.
/
	./
-

,/

-
,	


9		
,,	
/	
	


		
		

.		


		/>,	/	 2

,	,,	


		7
 

, >	-


	
-
	

,

	




				


2
%9.&	)
#

&	)
B-&	/.	,

	,
		-	
%9.

&	/
-#&		


27
	-


	,	-,/	
.-


	

			


	A	,A		

>-,	/
	

	2


B-&	2	,	.
,	/




,.
	
-



,,				
		-

.,	.

	


,	
.-.


,	
	)-).	
#

&	.

)


.	,	

		-	
.

%9.&	,

$-A		,,	./



B-&	-


#&	/,,	


%9.&	
	)	-/


,--9	

>2


J	&	

!	<K3
!
-K2

/
	
	




.,	.-
"	

	/


.

,	
.		
)

//
	


.	,7
	
-		


	,	-





			/)	

.)	/
/

-
-

2
%9.&	


/
%9.&	


#/,	.	
"	/


-		,		,	)

--)	
		,	

#	
7
	,		


,)
%9.&	/-



	2	-
	


%9.&	
/
-


,	.),	,
	



	
	
		 

 
	
	

	

	


<	

	
7



)
/		)
7
	



	)
	

	,	2	-


..
	/	

2,2-	
	


-
/	





		
	
		

	
		

	
	

,
		,	

-			
.


,
	,

/
	

-


/-)


/
/	
-
		
"	

	
.
)

7
,,		
-	
),	

,,
-
)
-


,)/

-

,,	



,	9	
	
	
		 


.)-
),	,		

%-A	#0-!	

1#0!4)/.-	<
		-

/
,	
B-&	

	. 	
%9.&	3	

,	)
#&	2	

	2/	/>,			/	,	

	,.	
%9.&	


/>	
/)	

,	.-	



	,#&	
/-


>,	,		


	%.
,/	)/.

	-A/	-&	B/)


-	)	#0!

,	-	 )B	
)/)

.B		


#0!&	B/)	-/


			)./	 -	

/

,,	--	.	,/2

--.	
			)-)

	-)	-A	))	

7
	
#&	


#0!	,-	

.
7
-/

<

0!	-	-

	,.
..-

	
,
		
#0!

->.	.


)
	

,

	,	-
7
,	


	
.	,	-

-
-


7
-	
#&	

,	.-

,		-.)

-
),	,	




	,,		


	>,	



		-

-A		/


-		-/


	,			-.	


	
	A


.)
	
7
 )/

.
-


.	,-	
#&	


-
.	-

	,

	,



	



	)
B-&	2

	

	2/	,	.


"	/

/-
-,

	,	-


	
-
.	A	

,A	)
B-&		/


		<
-,	.


>	-		

-
.-- /
	


-)
	
-

	
	



		

-2

-
%9.&	/
 -

,
 /

	
	

',A	
	.


,->-/,	

.
)/
	A	.	,

,	
//
,	.

/-
-,



*+2	A

',A		-2





	-



2@D,
)2@0 / )

!2D+!
		 
	,H
3*

 H
30-
-.
H


	.!,2?


,-3	A	,	.


 -	
-	
#

%9.&	
!
2

,	,
	/A/,	.	

	.
		
	



	
	
		 


.)-
),	,		

%-A	#0-!	

1#0!4)/.-	<
		-

/
,	
B-&	

	. 	
%9.&	3	

,	)
#&	2	

	2/	/>,			/	,	

	,.	
%9.&	


/>	
/)	

,	.-	



	,#&	
/-


>,	,		


	%.
,/	)/.

	-A/	-&	B/)


-	)	#0!

,	-	 )B	
)/)

.B		


#0!&	B/)	-/


			)./	 -	

/

,,	--	.	,/2

--.	
			)-)

	-)	-A	))	

7
	
#&	


#0!	,-	

.
7
-/

<

0!	-	-

	,.
..-

	
,
		
#0!

->.	.


)
	

,

	,	-
7
,	


	
.	,	-

-
-


7
-	
#&	

,	.-

,		-.)

-
),	,	




	,,		


	>,	



		-

-A		/


-		-/


	,			-.	


	
	A


.)
	
7
 )/

.
-


.	,-	
#&	


-
.	-

	,

	,



	



	)
B-&	2

	

	2/	,	.


"	/

/-
-,

	,	-


	
-
.	A	

,A	)
B-&		/


		<
-,	.


>	-		

-
.-- /
	


-)
	
-

	
	



		

-2

-
%9.&	/
 -

,
 /

	
	

',A	
	.


,->-/,	

.
)/
	A	.	,

,	
//
,	.

/-
-,



*+2	A

',A		-2





	-



2@D,
)2@0 / )

!2D+!
		 
	,H
3*

 H
30-
-.
H


	.!,2?


,-3	A	,	.


 -	
-	
#

%9.&	
!
2

,	,
	/A/,	.	

	.
		
	



	
	
		 

 
	
	

	

	


<	

	
7



)
/		)
7
	



	)
	

	,	2	-


..
	/	

2,2-	
	


-
/	





		
	
		

	
		

	
	

,
		,	

-			
.


,
	,

/
	

-


/-)


/
/	
-
		
"	

	
.
)

7
,,		
-	
),	

,,
-
)
-


,)/

-

,,	



,	9	
ADDENDUM

Data required by the National Defense Authorization Act of 1994

Section 517 (b)(2)(A). The promotion rate for officers considered for promotion from within the promotion 

zone who are serving as active component advisors to units of the Selected Reserve of the Ready 

Reserve (in accordance with that program) compared with the promotion rate for other officers considered 

for promotion from within the promotion zone in the same pay grade and the same competitive category, 

shown for all officers of the Army. 

AC in RC * Army Average**

Fiscal Year 2000 (percent)

Major 65.0 79.5

Lieutenant Colonel 44.4 72.1

Fiscal Year 2001 (percent)

Major 71.0 82.9 

Lieutenant Colonel 50.0 75.7 

*Active component officers serving in reserve component assignments at time of consideration.

**Active component officers not serving in reserve component assignments at the time of consideration.

Section 517 (b)(2)(B). The promotion rate for officers considered for promotion from below the promotion 

zone who are serving as active component advisors to units of the Selected Reserve of the Ready 

Reserve (in accordance with that program) compared in the same manner (as the paragraph above). 

AC in RC*** ARMY 

Fiscal Year 2000 (percent)

Major 2.3 4.8

Lieutenant Colonel 0 6.3 

Fiscal Year 2001 (percent)

Major 3.0 5.1

Lieutenant Colonel 0 6.0

** * Below the zone active component officers serving in reserve component assignments at time of consideration.

*****Below the zone active component officers not serving in reserve component assignments at the time of consideration.

Section 521(b).

1. The number and percentage of officers with at least two years of active-duty before becoming a 

member of the Army National Guard or the U.S. Army Reserve Selected Reserve units. 

a. Army National Guard (ARNG) officers: 21,322 or 58.3 percent

b. U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) officers 20,494 or 60 percent

2. The number and percentage of enlisted personnel with at least two years of active-duty before 

becoming a member of the Army National Guard or the U.S. Army Reserve Selected Reserve units.

a. ARNG enlisted: 148,710 or 47.2 percent

b. USAR enlisted: 57,051 or 35 percent
3. The numbers of officers who are graduates of one of the service academies and were released from 

active duty before the completion of their active-duty service obligation. Of those officers 

a. The number who are serving the remaining period of their active -duty service obligation as a 

member of the Selected Reserve pursuant to section 1112(a)(1) of ANGCRRA:

• In FY01, 25 officers were released to the selective reserve to complete their obligation. 

b. The number for whom waivers were granted by the Secretary under section 1112(a)(2) of 

ANGCRRA, together with the reason for each waiver: 

• In FY01, 1 waiver, for mental disorder, was granted by the Secretary of the Army.

4. The number of officers who were commissioned as distinguished Reserve Officers' Training Corps 

graduates and were released from active duty before the completion of their active-duty service 

obligation: 

• In FY01, 4 ROTC DMG graduates were released before completing their active duty 

service obligation. 

Of those officers 

a. The number who are serving the remaining period of their active -duty service obligation as a 

member of the Selected Reserve pursuant to section 1112(a)(1) of ANGCRRA: 

• In FY01, 4 were released from AD and assigned to ARNG to complete their obligation. 

b. The number for whom waivers were granted by the Secretary under section 1112(a)(2) of 

ANGCRRA, together with the reason for each waiver: 

• In FY01, no waivers were granted by the Secretary of the Army.

5. The number of officers who are graduates of the Reserve Officers' Training Corps program and who 

are performing their minimum period of obligated service in accordance with section 1112(b) of 

ANGCRRA by a combination of (A) two years of active duty, and (B) such additional period of service 

as is necessary to complete the remainder of such obligation served in the National Guard and, of 

those officers, the number for whom permission to perform their minimum period of obligated service 

in accordance with that section was granted during the preceding fiscal year; and the number of 

officers who are graduates of the Reserve Officers’ Training Corps program and who are performing 

their minimum period of obligated service in accordance with section 1112(b) of ANGCRRA by a 

combination of (A) two years of active duty, and (B) such additional period of service as is necessary 

to complete the remainder of such additional period of service as is necessary to complete the 

remainder of such obligation served in the U.S. Army Reserve and, of those officer, the number for 

whom permission to perform their minimum period of obligated service in accordance with that 

section was granted during the preceding fiscal year. 

• In FY01, a total of 105 ROTC graduates were released early from their active duty 

obligation. Of these, were Distinguished Military Graduates and previously accounted for 

in question 4. The remaining ROTC graduates are serving the remainder of their

obligation in the National Guard. 

6. The number of officers for whom recommendations were made during the preceding fiscal year for a 

unit vacancy promotion to a grade above first lieutenant and, of those recommendations, the number 

and percentage that were concurred in by an active duty officer under section 1113(a) of ANGCRRA, 

shown separately for each of the three cat egories of officers set forth in section 1113(b) of

ANGCRRA:

a. 178 USAR officers from units were recommended for unit vacancy promotion. 153 were 

favorably considered. 
b. In the ARNG, in FY01, the number of officers recommended for unit vacancy promotions, 

above the grade of first lieutenant, was 2020. An active duty officer concurred in 100 percent 

of those officer promotions.

7. The number of waivers during the preceding fiscal year under section 1114(a) of ANGCRRA of any 

standard prescribed by the Secretary establishing a military education requirement for

noncommissioned officers and the reason for each such waiver. 

• In FY01, no waivers were granted by the Secretary of the Army.

8. The number and distribution by grade, shown for each State, of personnel in the initial entry training 

and non-deployability personnel accounting category established under 1115 of ANGCRRA for

members of the Army National Guard who have not completed the minimum training required for 

deployment or who are otherwise not available for deployment and a narrative summarizing

procedures to be followed in FY00 to account for members of the USAR who have not completed the 

minimum training required for deployment or who are otherwise not available for deployment: 

a. In FY01, the number of ARNG non-deployable personnel was: 45,539. The National Guard 

Bureau (NGB) maintains the detailed information. 

b. The USAR makes a substantial investment in training, time, equipment, and related

expenses when persons enter military service. Separation before completion of an obligated 

period of service is wasteful because it results in loss of this investment and generates a 

requirement for increased accessions. Consequently, attrition is an issue of significant

concern at all levels of responsibility within the USAR. Reasonable efforts are made to 

identify soldiers who exhibit a likelihood for early separation, and to improve their chances for 

retention through counseling, retraining, and rehabilitation prior to initiation of separation 

proceedings. 

Non Prior Service (NPS) enlistees in USAR units will normally be ordered to IADT within 270 

days of enlistment. NPS direct enlistees in the IRR must enter IADT within 180 days after 

date of enlistment. NPS enlistees may be authorized an additional period of delay from 

reporting as provided in AR 601-25, paragraph 3-4. 

An enlisted soldier who cannot satisfactorily complete the MOS training for which selected 

will be required to accept training to qualify for an alternate MOS as determined by the USAR 

unit commander (AR 612- 201).

The tracking of new soldiers who have not completed training is done by the use of the 

Training Pay category codes. All soldiers who are awaiting shipment to Basic training are 

listed as Pay Category ‘P’. Those soldiers who have completed Basic training, returned to 

their USAR unit, and are now waiting to attend Advanced Individual Training are coded as 

Pay Category ‘Q’. Those soldiers attending training are carried in Pay Category ‘F’ while they 

are at school. 

Those soldiers who are not “deployable” for reasons other than lack of IET are listed on the 

personnel databases with a code indicating the reasons for their non-deployable status. 

9. The number of members of the Army National Guard, shown for each State, that were discharged 

during the previous fiscal year pursuant to 1115(c)(1) of ANGCRRA for not completing the minimum 

training required for deployment within 24 months after entering the National Guard and a narrative 

summarizing procedures to be followed in FY01 for discharging members of the USAR who have not 

completed the minimum training required for deployment within 24 months of entering the USAR.

a. The number of ARNG soldiers discharged during the previous fiscal year pursuant to

11115(c)(1) of ARNGCRRA for not completing the minimum training required for deployment 

within 24 months after entering the ARNG is 1,109, which includes all 54 states and

territories. The breakdown by each state is maintained by NGB. 

b. Those soldiers who have not completed the required IET within the first 24 months are 

discharged from the USAR under AR 135-178 Separation of Enlisted Personnel. Before 
discharge, every means available is used to ensure the soldier has had the opportunity to be 

trained. In some cases, the soldier was unable to attend the required scheduled training 

through no fault of the soldier, (e.g. temporary medical condition, death of an immediate 

family member, failure to complete high school and requiring an additional semester of 

summer school).

10. The number of waivers, shown for each State, that were granted by the Secretary during the previous 

fiscal year under section 1115(c)(2) of ANGCRRA of the requirement in section 1115(c)(1) of 

ANGCRRA described in paragraph (9), together with the reason for each waiver.

• In FY01, no waivers were granted by the Secretary of the Army.

11. The number of Army National Guard members, shown for each State, and the number of US Army 

Reserve members shown by each RSC/GOCOM, who were 

a. Screened during the preceding fiscal year to determine whether they meet minimum physical 

profile standards required for deployment;

• In FY01, 92,051 approximately ARNG underwent a retention physical. Of these

personnel, 2,730 persons, or 3 percent, did not meet the minimum physical profile

standards required for deployment.

• In FY01, USAR screened 26,296 soldiers. Of these, 149 failed (0.6 percent) to meet the 

minimum physical profile standards required for deployment.

b. The number and percentage that were transferred pursuant to section 1116 of ANGCRRA to 

the personnel accounting category described in paragraph (8). 

• In FY01, ARNG 2,730 persons who were transferred from a deployable to a

nondeployable. 

12. The number of members, and the percentage total membership, of the Army National Guard, shown 

for each State, and for the U.S. Army reserve shown by each RSC/DRU, who underwent a medical 

screening during the previous fiscal year as provided in section 1117 of ANGCRRA. 

• Public Law 104-106, Div A, Title VII, Section 704 (b), Feb 10, 1996, repealed Section 

1117 of ANGCRRA. 

13. The number of members, and the percentage of the total membership, of the Army National Guard, 

shown for each State, and the number of members, and the percentage of the total membership, of 

the U.S. Army Reserve shown for each RSC/DRU, who underwent a dental screening during the 

previous fiscal year as provided in section 1117 of ANGCRRA. 

• Public Law 104-106, Div A, Title VII, Section 704 (b), Feb 10, 1996, repealed Section 

1117 of ANGCRRA. 

14. The number of members, and the percentage of the total membership, of the Army National Guard, 

shown for each State, and the number of members, and the percentage of total Selected Reserve 

unit membership, of the U.S. Army Reserve, shown for each RSC/DRU, over the age of 40 who 

underwent a full physical examination during the previous fiscal year for purposes of section 1117 of 

ANGCRRA. 

• Public Law 104-106, Div A, Title VII, Section 704 (b), Feb 10, 1996, repealed Section 

1117 of ANGCRRA. 

15. The number of units of the Army National Guard, and of the U.S. Army Reserve, that are scheduled 

for early deployment in the event of a mobilization and, of those units, the number that are dentally 

ready for deployment in accordance with section 1118 of ANGCRRA. 

• Public Law 104-106, Div A, Title VII, Section 704 (b), Feb 10, 1996, repealed Section 

1118 of ANGCRRA. 
16. The estimated post-mobilization training time for each Army National Guard combat and FSP unit, 

and U.S. Army Reserve FSP unit, and a description, displayed in broad categories and by State for 

Army National Guard units, and by the RSC/GOCOM for U.S. Army Reserve units, of what training 

would need to be accomplished for Army National Guard combat and CFP units, and U.S. Army 

Reserve units, in a post-mobilization period for purposes of section 1119 of ANGCRRA. 

a. Estimated time for post mobilization training is reported through the Unit Status Report, is

classified, and is maintained by the Department of the Army, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff 

for Operations, Force Readiness Division.

b. Information on the type of training required by units during post mobilization is maintained by the 

Continental United States Armies (CONUSAs).

c. Post mobilization training for enhanced Separate Brigades (eSB) can be categorized as

maneuver, attack, defend, protect the force, gunnery and NBC defense. 

d. Post mobilization training for FSP units is principally common task testing, NBC defense, force 

protection, sustainment, command and control, weapons qualification, tactical communications 

training, and branch specific technical training. Virtually all units also require branch specific 

technical training to meet deployment standards.

17. A description of the measures taken during the preceding fiscal year to comply with the requirement 

in section 1120 of ANGCRRA to expand the use of simulations, simulators, and advanced training 

devices and technologies for members and units of the Army National Guard and the U.S. Army 

Reserve. 

• The ARNG made significant progress in the use of Training Aids, Devices, Simulators, 

and Simulations (TADSS) during the preceding fiscal year. The ARNG teamed with 

TRADOC Systems Manager Combined Arms Tactical Trainer in developing a Maneuver 

Gated Training Strategy that incorporates the use of Maneuver Simulators into training 

plans that produce increased unit proficiency. The ARNG is on the verge of fielding the 

Abrams Full-Crew interactive Simulator Trainer (A-FIST XXI). The A-FIST XXI will 

provide us with an appended precision gunnery trainer that allows soldiers to train on 

their assigned equipment at home station and virtually replicating the tough doctrinal 

Tank Table Standards of a live range. The ARNG JANUS Battle Staff Trainers are being 

updated to the Army's approved software solution and hardware procurement is being 

planned and executed that will support the One SAF Future Combat System fielding in a 

seamless manner. The ARNG took delivery of its first EST 2000 marksmanship training 

systems. These systems are used in support of units conducting the vital homeland 

defense and airport security missions assigned to the ARNG. 

The ARNG developed a unique partnership with STRICOM in the development,

verification, validation and accreditation of systems and system upgrades. Through the 

ARNG Distributed Battle Simulation Program (DBSP) civilian infrastructure Commander's 

receive assistance from graybeard mentors, TADSS Facilitators, and JANUS Tech Team 

Exercise Support in the planning, preparation, and execution of simulations based

training that augments the support provided by TS XXI soldiers and greatly enhanced unit 

proficiency and readiness

18. Summary tables of unit readiness, shown for each State for Army National Guard units, and for each 

RSC/GOCOM for the U.S. Army Reserve units, and drawn from the unit readiness rating system as 

required by section 1121 of ANGCRRA, including the personnel readiness rating information and the 

equipment readiness assessment information required by that section, together with–

a. Explanations of the information shown in the table. Summary tables are classified. This 

information is maintained by maintained by the Department of the Army, Office of the Deputy 

Chief of Staff for Operations, Training Division.
b. Based on the information shown in the tables, the Secretary's overall assessment of the 

deployability of units of the ARNG, and USAR, including a discussion of personnel

deficiencies and equipment shortfalls in accordance with such section 1121: 

• Summary tables and assessments are classified. This information is maintained by the 

Department of the Army, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations, Training 

Division. 

19. Summary tables, shown for each State, for units of the Army National Guard and for each RSC/DRU 

for units of the U.S. Army Reserve, of the results of inspections of units of the Army National Guard 

by inspectors general or other commissioned officers of the Regular Army under the provisions of 

section 105 of title 32, together with explanations of the information shown in the tables, and including 

display of: 

a. The number of such inspections;

b. Identification of the entity conducting each inspection;

c. The number of units inspected; and

d. The overall results of such inspections, including the inspector's determination for each 

inspected unit of whether the unit met deployability standards and, for those units not meeting 

deployability standards, the reasons for such failure and the status of corrective actions. For 

purposes of this report, data for Operational Readiness Evaluations will be provided on eSB 

and FSP units of the ARNG and for FSP units of the USAR. Training Assessment Model 

data will be provided to meet this reporting requirement for all other units of the ARNG and 

USAR. Data on ARNG units will be reported by State and on USAR units by RSC/DRU.

• During FY01, ARNG state level Inspectors General conducted extensive inspections 

throughout the U. S. State level Inspectors General conducted approximately 639 

inspections during the year, visiting 812 separate units. Because IG inspections focus on 

findings and recommendations, the units involved in these inspections were not provided 

with a pass/fail rating. Results of inspections conducted by Inspectors General are 

available upon request from the responsible state IG. Operational Readiness Evaluation 

Data for FSP and eSBs is unavailable as these inspections were eliminated as

requirements in 1997. Data available under the Training Assessment Model (TAM) 

relates to readiness levels and is generally not available in an unclassified format. TAM 

data is maintained at the state level and is available upon request from state level training 

readiness officials. 

• The United States Army Reserve Command (USARC) conducts Organizational

Inspection Program (OIP) inspections for RSCs/DSUs. Eight such inspections were 

conducted in FY 2001 and all met deployability standards. Forces Command maintains 

the results of the CONUSA inspections, Training Assessment Models (TAMs), and holds 

the data for Reserve Component FSP unit inspections.

• Summary tables depicting CONUSA inspection numbers by state for the ARNG and by 

Regional Support Command for the USAR units are available from G3, DCSOPS,

FORSCOM. 

20. A listing, for each Army National Guard combat and FSP unit, and the U.S. Army Reserve FSP units, 

of the active-duty combat and other units associated with that Army National Guard and U.S. Army 

Reserve unit in accordance with section 1131(a) of ANGCRRA, shown by State for the Army National 

Guard and RSC/GOCOM for the U.S. Army Reserve: 

a. This information is contained in FORSCOM Regulation 350-4, Appendix B and C. An 

electronic version can be viewed at www.forscom.army.mil/pubs/Pubs/2530/SEC1-7_1.HTM.

and to be accompanied, for each such National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve unit, by -- 
b. The assessment of the commander of that associated active-duty unit of the manpower, 

equipment, and training resource requirements of that National Guard or U.S. Army Reserve 

unit in accordance with section 1131(b)(3) of ANGCRRA. Detailed assessments of specific 

RC units are maintained at the two numbered Armies in the continental United States 

(CONUSA) and three CONUS-based corps.

c. Army National Guard divisions and eSB.

• Manpower. Several eSB have shortages in enlisted personnel and junior officers. Duty 

Military Occupational Specialty Qualification (DMOSQ) is a training challenge because 

Military Occupational Specialties (MOS) require extensive training, often at sequential 

schools. Within the eSB Full Time Support (FTS) continues to be a challenge. In the 

eSB FTS is approximately 55 percent of requirements. In divisions, recent force structure 

authorization increases are causing short-term fill percentages shortfalls. 

• Equipment. Equipment on-hand versus equipment authorized continues to hamper eSB 

conversion. Shortages in chemical defense equipment and night vision devices limit the 

full range of training for eSB. 

• Training. Adequate training resources in FY 01 enabled eSB to sustain platoon premobilization training proficiency. Distances to crew-served weapons ranges and the 

availability of adequate maneuver areas continue to challenge most units. Current 

simulations do not provide a theater-level simulation system, compatible with current 

simulation suites that replicate a Major Theater of War scenario. 

d. ARNG and USAR Force Support Package Units.

• Manpower. Short falls in FTS manning limit operations and training management. 

Sustaining DMOSQ impacted by limited school spaces for low density MOS. Some MOS 

require extensive training (11M, 19K, 13B, 13F, 31, and 63H) and sequential schools 

require a soldier’s absence from their civilian employment for extended periods.

• Equipment. Some FSP units have equipment that is incompatible their active

counterparts. This creates problems, especially with command and control, during

training. Several FSP units will have to acquire needed force modernization equipment 

at the mobilization station. 

• Training. Some Equipment Readiness Code-A equipment shortages inhibit effective 

training. Units will require additional training time after mobilization to achieve proficiency 

on collective tasks. Limited funds and/or limited days available for training generally 

cause soldiers to attend either Annual Training or DMOSQ schools. Distance to training 

areas and facilities further erodes available training time.

e. The results of the validation by the commander of that associated active -duty unit of the 

compatibility of that National Guard or U.S. Army Reserve unit with active duty forces in 

accordance with section 1131(b)(4) of ANGCRRA. 

• Detailed validations are maintained by the Department of the Army, Office of the Deputy 

Chief of Staff for Operations, Training Division. 

• For ARNG divisions and eSBs, Single Channel Ground and Airborne Radio System and 

Mobile Subscriber Equipment connectivity is the foremost compatibility issue. As MTOE 

changes and unit reorganizations continue, compatibility will improve. 

• ARNG and USAR FSP unit equipment shortages resulting from reorganizations and 

MTOE changes affect compatibility the most. Nonstandard software systems in these 

units affect both the Standard Installation Division Personnel System and the Unit Level 

Logistics System. Corresponding systems between components are frequently very 

different. Most FSP units will not be fully compatible with AC units until after mobilization. 

21. A specification of the active -duty personnel assigned to units of the Selected Reserve pursuant to 

section 414(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993 (10 U.S.C. 

261 note), shown (A) by State for the Army National Guard and RSC/GOCOM for the U.S. Army 
Reserve, (b) by rank of officers, warrant officers, and enlisted members assigned, and (c) by unit or 

other organizational entity of assignment. 

• The Army restructuring process is complete. All mal-assigned soldiers have been 

reassigned or retired. Current and projected strength is 98 to 100 percent. The goal 

under the Army’s Manning Initiative is 100 percent for combat units. The Army Personnel 

Command Strength Branch, Distribution Division will continue to track titled and non-titled 

positions.