alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AMENDMENT TO THE
ALPHARMA INC. 1997 INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION 
AND APPRECIATION RIGHT PLAN



The Alpharma Inc. 1997 Inventive Stock and Appreciation Right Plan (the "Plan") is hereby amended effective as of June 22, 2006, as follows:



1.    Section 17 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following to the end thereof:

"Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board of Directors has delegated to the executive management Benefits Committee the authority to adopt administrative amendments to the Plan, provided, that such amendments do not involve a change in the costs or liability of the Company or alter the benefits payable thereunder.  The Board of Directors has delegated to the Compensation Committee the authority to adopt all other amendments to the Plan, provided, that such amendments do not significantly increase or decrease benefit amounts, or  are  required  to be adopted by the Board of Directors under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), or the regulations thereunder.  The Board of Directors retains the authority to adopt amendments to the Plan that significantly increase or decrease benefit amounts, or are required to be adopted by the Board of Directors under the Code or regulations thereunder."



*	*	*

|__/s/George P. Rose_________ | October 23, 2006
|---------------------------- | ----------------
|ALPHARMA INC.                | DATE
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 168 (Thursday, August 31, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 60181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18816]



[[Page 60181]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-31-2023]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 147; Authorization of Production 
Activity; PolyVisions Holdings, Inc.; (Plastic Resin Compounds); 
Manchester, Pennsylvania

    On April 28, 2023, PolyVisions Holdings, Inc. submitted a 
notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its 
facility within FTZ 147, in Manchester, Pennsylvania.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (88 FR 29080, May 5, 2023). On August 
28, 2023, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that 
no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The 
production activity described in the notification was authorized, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including 
section 400.14.

    Dated: August 28, 2023.
Camille Evans,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-18816 Filed 8-30-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
PUBLIC LAW 107–178—MAY 17, 2002 116 STAT. 579

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3282:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 147 (2001): Dec. 11, considered and passed House.

Vol. 148 (2002): Apr. 30, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 107–178

107th Congress

An Act

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 400

North Main Street in Butte, Montana, as the ‘‘Mike Mansfield Federal Building

and United States Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The Federal building and United States courthouse located

at 400 North Main Street in Butte, Montana, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Mike Mansfield Federal Building and United

States Courthouse’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the Federal building and

United States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

to be a reference to the ‘‘Mike Mansfield Federal Building and

United States Courthouse’’.

Approved May 17, 2002.

May 17, 2002

[H.R. 3282]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                         COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION

                          Calculation of Loss Per Share


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         YEAR ENDED MAY 31,
                                                  -------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   1997         1996          1995         1994          1993
                                                  -------      -------      --------      -------      --------
                                                            (AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S>                                               <C>          <C>          <C>           <C>          <C>      
Primary and Fully Diluted:

Loss applicable to common stock:
  Net loss ..................................     $(2,828)     $(4,242)     $(11,533)     $(7,852)     $(11,600)
                                                  =======      =======      ========      =======      ========

Average number of shares of common stock and
  common stock equivalents ..................       3,088        2,654         2,257        2,199         2,196
                                                  =======      =======      ========      =======      ========

Loss per common and common equivalent share:
  Net loss ..................................     $ (0.92)     $ (1.60)     $  (5.11)     $ (3.57)     $  (5.28)
                                                  =======      =======      ========      =======      ========
</TABLE>



                                       65
#### William Wilsey, Appellant, v. John Yourden, Respondent

Judgment and order reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. Opinion by

Follett, J.
#### George B. Kent and another, Appellants, v. Michael Kalb and others, Respondents.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered* costs to abide event. Opinion by Barker, J.; dissenting opinion by Bradley, J.
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.119

CORAM HEALTHCARE                                     1675 Broadway
                                                     Suite 900
                                                     Denver, Colorado 80202
                                                     303.292.4973 / 800 CORAM WC
                                                     303.298.0043 FAX
                                                     www.coramhc.com


April 2, 2004

Rosalee Satterthwaite
National Accounts Manager
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
1627 Lake Cook Road
Deerfield, Illinois 60015

Re:  Mutual Waiver of Damages

Dear Ms. Satterthwaite:

The purpose of this letter is to confirm the agreement of Baxter Healthcare
Corporation ("Baxter") and Coram, Inc. ("Coram") that, as of the date written
below, each of Baxter and Coram expressly waive any claim of antecedent breach
for claims for monetary damages, liquidated or otherwise, arising out of the
other party's breach of the Product Volume Commitment Agreement dated December
19, 2001 by and between Baxter and Coram, as amended by the First Amendment to
Hemophilia Product Volume Commitment Agreement dated December 13, 2002 and the
Second Amendment to Hemophilia Product Volume Commitment Agreement dated
September 24, 2003 and the Extension of Pricing Terms dated March 31, 2004.

Please acknowledge Baxter's agreement to this mutual Waiver of Damages by
having an authorized representative of Baxter execute this letter in the space
marked below and return it to Coram, Inc. at the address listed above.

Sincerely,

CORAM, INC.

By: /s/ SCOTT R. DANITZ
    --------------------------------------
    Scott R. Danitz, SRVP, CFO & Treasurer


Accepted and agreed to this 5th day of April 2004:

BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

By:  /s/ PETER O'MALLEY
     -------------------------------------
Its: VP/GM
     -------------------------------------
#### In the Matter of the Application of W. Holden Weeks, Appellant, *v.*John E. Kraft et al., Constituting the State Civil Service Commission, Respondents.

*Matter of WeeJcs*v. *Kraft,*147 App. Div. 403, appeal dismissed.

(Argued April 29, 1912;

decided May 7, 1912.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appel-' late Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 28,1911, which reversed an order of Special Term granting a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the state civil service commission to revoke a resolution classifying the position of transfer tax appraiser in the exempt class.

The motion was made upon the ground that it does not appear that the order was reversed as a matter of law.

*Franklin Kennedy*for motion.

*Albert De Boode*opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs, and ten dollars costs of motion.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; External Quality Assurance Program Oversight Laboratory (EQAPOL), RFP: 75N93022R00034.                    

*Date:*                         September 15, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G21B, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Robert C. Unfer, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G21B, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-669-5035.                         *unferrc@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 18, 2023.

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-18147 Filed 8-22-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
---

---

EXHIBIT 23.13



We consent to
  the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.
  333-61895 and Form S-8 No. 333-55970) of our report dated February 4, 2003,
  with respect to the financial statements of **Renaissance Investment Company
  Ltd** included in the Annual Report (Form 10K) for 2003 of Ampal American
  Israel Corporation.



|**Kost
      Forer Gabbay & Kasierer**
|--------------------------------------
|A member
      of Ernst & Young Global

March 28, 2004

---

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 59538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18589]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-1104 (Third Review)]


Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From China

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
review, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on certain 
polyester staple fiber from China would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the 
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted this review on March 1, 2023 (88 FR 
12987) and determined on June 5, 2023 that it would conduct an 
expedited review (88 FR 44399, July 12, 2023).
    The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determination in this review on August 24, 2023. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5456 (August 2023), 
entitled Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from China: Investigation No. 
731-TA-1104 (Third Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: August 24, 2023.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-18589 Filed 8-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
---

---

Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ampal  American Israel Corporation
(the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, Irit Eluz, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies,
to the best of her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to sec.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

March 17, 2008

| |  | By:        /s/ Irit Eluz
Irit Eluz, Chief Financial Officer and SeniorVice President - Finance and Treasurer
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
Page | of 1

VISION
LEGAL PROCESSING DI ATIONS x .
PUBLICATION & REOUM PRECHEUZ1O AUG 2 6 2010

As of: August 26, 2010

PUBLIC Status: Posted

Posted: August 26, 2010
SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0422
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Tom Budny
Address:

PO Box 2574

Corinth, MS, 38835
Email: budnychiro@gmail.com
Phone: 662-287-8424
Fax: 662-287-4116
Submitter's Representative: Ashley Taylor
Organization: Corinth Chiropractic Health Center
Government Agency Type: Federal
Government Agency: HHS

General Comment

See attached file(s)

Attachments

IRS-2010-0010-0422.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

http://fdms.erulemaking net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/26/2010


August 10, 2010

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to
Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comrnents
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

Dr. Tom Budny
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.59 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
[No. 2669.]

#### Perkins v. Boyd.

Appellate Practice — Failure to File Record in Time — Dismissal.

The failure of an appellant to file his record with the appellate court within the time prescribed by the code does not of itself deprive him of his appeal. An appeal will not be dismissed because the record was not filed within the required time, where the motion to dismiss was not made until after the record was filed, and where it appears that no prejudicial delay has been caused by the failure to file the record within the prescribed time.

*Appeal from the District Court of El Pasa County.*

*448Mr. C. J, Perkins, for appellant,

Mr. H. McGarry, for appellee.

*Per Curiam.*

This cause having been appealed more than, thirty days before the commencement of the January term, 1902, of this court, the record should have been lodged in the office of the cleric of this court not later than January 15, being the third day after the beginning of said term. — Code, sec. 389.

It was not so lodged, ¡however, until February 28, following.

Appellee moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground of this failure, but said motion was not filed until April 7, 1902, long subsequent to the actual filing of the record.

The code section has been directly passed upon by the supreme court in a case involving a precisely similar state of facts, and it was there held that the failure of appellants in this respect did not of itself deprive them of their *appeal.*—Thalheimer *v. Crow,*13 Colo. 403, citing *Sparrow v. Strong,*3 Wall. 103.

Upon the authority of this decision, and it further appearing that no prejudicial delay has been occasioned by the failure of appellant, the motion to dismiss will he denied. ‘ *Motion denied.*
From: Stivers, LeeAnn [mailto:leeanns@OWS.ORG] 

Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 12:16 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Comments on Lifetime-income RFI

Dear Dept. of Labor,

My husband and I heartily endorse the idea of offering a lifetime annuity option for 401K 

participants. This is an important option and we believe more people would choose this option if 

the facts were presented: a guaranteed income for life without risk is an essential part of any 

retirement portfolio.

 

Our chief concern about lifetime annuities is the long-term ability of any insurance company to 

pay the promised benefits. If there was a lifetime-income security fund, comparable to the FDIC 

in banking, this would make the decision to invest in annuities much easier. 

 

In summary, we strongly encourage this option to be made available AND a government security 

fund to be included as part of this valuable change.

Thank you!

LeeAnn and Dan Stivers