alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Navy Rescues Mariners Smuggling Illicit Drugs
 
  By 5th Fleet Public Affairs - NAVCENT
  U.S. Navy personnel rescued five mariners Dec. 15 after a fire caused an explosion aboard their vessel, which was smuggling illicit drugs while transiting the Gulf of Oman.
U.S. Navy patrol craft USS Sirocco (PC 6) observed the mariners in distress and immediately rendered assistance while conducting a counter-narcotics patrol. Sailors from Sirocco safely rescued five mariners injured in the explosion. One mariner remains missing.
The injured mariners, who identified themselves as Iranian citizens, were later transported to expeditionary mobile base platform ship USS Lewis B. Puller (ESB 3). Two were flown by helicopter to Oman for medical treatment, and the other three mariners were later transported to Oman for eventual repatriation.
Prior to the fire, international maritime forces suspected the vessel of transporting illicit drugs. Sirocco was operating as part of Combined Task Force (CTF) 150, one of three task forces under Combined Maritime Forces, the world’s largest naval partnership.
Sirocco seized more than 1,745 kilograms of hashish, 500 kilograms of methamphetamine, and 30 kilograms of heroin all worth an estimated total of $14.7 million.
CTF 150 conducts maritime security and counter-terrorism operations at sea, outside the Arabian Gulf, to disrupt criminal and terrorist organizations and their related illicit activities, including the movement of personnel, weapons, narcotics and charcoal. These efforts help ensure legitimate commercial shipping transits the region free from non-state threats.
Combined Maritime Forces consists of 34 nations whose naval vessels and personnel operate in the Red Sea, Gulf of Aden, Northern Arabian Sea, Gulf of Oman, Indian Ocean and Arabian Gulf promoting security and stability.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         August 31, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on August 21, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 5 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2023-235, CP2023-238.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-18789 Filed 8-30-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
From: Leslie Stroud [mailto:lesliestroud2@gmail.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 11:38 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: DEPT of Labor RIN 1210-AB33

Regarding this proposal: This government is going too far with this discussion of “stealing

Americans 401K” in exchange for lifetime income.

Get out of our pockets and stop spending beyond your lifestyle. The govt clearly does not

understand living within your means. If I we have no job

There is no income for you to tax!!! I am opposed to any program as this you will encourage

people to spend it all or give it away.  What are you thinkin!!!!!!! This progressive democratic

policies must go........
Exhibit 99.1 to Form 10-QSB

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Cecil a. Brooks does hereby  certify that the  Quarterly  Report of  Cornerstone
Ministries Investments,  Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the nine months ended September
30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 10, 2004
/s/ Cecil A. Brooks, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

John T. Ottinger,  does hereby certify that the Quarterly  Report of Cornerstone
Ministries Investments,  Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the nine months ended September
30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  November 10, 2004
/s/ John T. Ottinger, Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.295 May employees or employers seek a second SAP evaluation if they disagree with the first SAP's recommendations? ( a ) As an employee with a DOT drug and alcohol regulation violation, when you have been evaluated by a SAP, you must not seek a second SAP's evaluation in order to obtain another recommendation.
( b ) As an employer, you must not seek a second SAP's evaluation if the employee has already been evaluated by a qualified SAP. If the employee, contrary to paragraph (a) of this section, has obtained a second SAP evaluation, as an employer you may not rely on it for any purpose under this part.
#### HOMER W. DEAKMAN AND T. RICHMOND WELLS, PARTNERS TRADING AS DEAKMAN-WELLS COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. THE ODD FELLOWS HALL ASSOCIATION OF JERSEY CITY, PROSECUTOR.

Submitted January 18, 1933

Decided July 25, 1933.

Before Justices Parker, Lloyd and Heher.

*647For the prosecutor, *Melosh, Morten & Melosh.*

For the respondent, *Autenrieth, Gannon & Wortendylce.*

Per Curiam.

The question in this case is whether under the ordinary writ of execution a levy may be made upon funds of the defendant deposited in bank. A writ of execution was issued out of the Circuit Court of Hudson county in the form directed by section 1 of the act respecting executions (2 *Comp. Stat., p.*2243) which directs :

“That in every writ of execution, which shall be issued against lands, tenements, hereditaments and real estate, the sheriff or other officer to whom said writ may be directed, shall be commanded' that of the goods and chattels in his county of the party against whom such execution issues, he cause to be made the debt, damages and costs or sum of money mentioned in said execution; and if sufficient goods and chattels of' the said party cannot be found in his county, that then he cause the whole or the residue, as the case may require, of the said debt, damages and costs, or sum of money to be made of the lands, tenements, hereditaments and real estate whereof the said party was seized.”

Under the Practice act of 1903 *(Comp. Stat., p.*4106), one recovering judgment could have such execution as he is entitled to against the body or the goods, or against the goods and lands of the party against whom the judgment was recovered.

In 1915, a supplement to the execution act was passed in chapter 115. By section 1 of that act rights and credits of a defendant in execution were made subject to levy, and thus the law respecting executions stands today.

In the act of 1915 it is provided that nothing contained therein shall impair any provision of the act to which it is a supplement. Ho modification of the form of the writ is directed or indeed authorized. Under the form used executions have been habitually issued for nearly twenty years and under these writs the rights and credits of debtors due to them from others have been taken in execution and availed *648of to satisfy judgments, and this fact is not without hearing on the interpretation which the courts should place upon the legislation.

When the legislature, without modifying the form of the writ of execution or authorizing the courts to modify it to suit supplementary legislation, incorporated within its purview additional objects upon which it could operate, it is fair to assume that the writ in its then form was intended to be continued and to be operative in its effects so as to include the additional subjects.

As the various proceedings taken in the court below turned for their validity upon the determination of the question already discussed, and as we have determined that these proceedings for the reasons already adduced were valid, the writ will he dismissed.
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0330[1].txt

-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/15/2010 09:28PM ----- To: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> From: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US

Date: 02/04/2010 11:01PM cc: wayland.robertj@epa.gov, horowitz.michael@epa.gov Subject: draft MACT floor memo Cortney, Attached is the draft MACT floor memo. You will see a few changes from the draft rule package. Based on the comments that EPA had not included variability in the MACT floor analysis, we took another look at the data. We removed tests for two engines because they were tested using a different test method than what is required in the rule, and we had concerns about using that data. We are also looking at individual runs for the MACT floor engines, rather than the average of the test runs, when determining what the MACT floor

should be.

Melanie King Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-2469 Fax: (919) 541-5450 king.melanie@epa.gov

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0330[1].txt2/22/2010 11:59:07 AM
#### Sarah E. Baucus, Appellant, v. James Barr, Alfred Worth and Robert Blair, Respondents, Impleaded, etc.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Bockes, J.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CITY PENSION FUND FOR 

FIREFIGHTERS AND POLICE OFFICERS IN THE CITY OF 

PEMBROKE PINES and THE CITY OF PEMBROKE PINES,

Appellants,

v.

KENNETH FRITZ, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly 

situated,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1794

[March 21, 2019]

Appeal and cross-appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; William W. Haury, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

11-0003579 (13).

Scott A. Cole of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Miami, for appellant The 

Board of Trustees of The City Pension Fund For Firefighters And Police 

Officers in The City of Pembroke Pines.

Michael T. Burke of Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke, Piper & 

Hochman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant The City of Pembroke Pines.

Karen Coolman Amlong and Jennifer Daley of Amlong & Amlong, P.A., 

Fort Lauderdale, for appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CONNER and FORST, JJ. concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Docket: EBSA-2010-0050 

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’ 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0001 

Definition of the Term Fiduciary 

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0002 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-26236 

Submitter Information 

Name: Gregg Peters 

Address: 

Lowell, MI, 

General Comment 

The proposed change that would include ESOP appraisers as investment advisors seems to be a 

large step. These individuals are not providing investment advise, but rather providing a value of 

the company. I would not consider an appraiser of any other asset to be an advisor, but rather 

performing a service of ascertaining value. What I choose to do with that value is my decision, 

not based on any advise provided by the appraiser. 

I agree there are issues with appraiser firms valuations, but not all firms have the same issues. 

How does the proposed change weed out the poor performing valuation firms? Guidance of what 

methodology should be used for an appraisal would be more helpful. The current proposal may 

force competent firms out of this line of business, leaving companies in need of an appraisal to 

sort through lower quality providers. 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION 

As of: November 03, 2010 

Received: November 02, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80b7d40e 

Comments Due: January 20, 2011

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 11/3/2010
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 603 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 236
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 603

                          [Report No. 107-776]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

            November 13 (legislative day, November 12), 2002

 Mr. Hastings of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of Wednesday, November 13, 
2002, providing for consideration or disposition of a joint resolution 
making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2003.

                                                 House Calendar No. 236

107th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 603

                          [Report No. 107-776]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

            November 13 (legislative day, November 12), 2002

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, November 1, 1995 (138), Para 138.25 Subsequent Action on Reported Bill Sequentially Referred]
[Page 1827]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.138.25  subsequent action on reported bill sequentially referred

  Pursuant to clause 5 of rule X the following action was taken by the 
Speaker:

       H.R. 1816. Referral to the Committee on Commerce extended 
     for a period ending not later than November 2, 1995.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 350 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     February 27, 2002.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 1542) to deregulate the Internet and high speed data services, and 
for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All 
points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate 
shall be confined to the bill and the amendments made in order by this 
resolution and shall not exceed one hour and 20 minutes, with one hour equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce and 20 minutes equally divided and controlled 
by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary. 
After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-
minute rule. In lieu of the amendments recommended by the Committee on Energy 
and Commerce and the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill, the 
amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in part A of the report of the 
Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted 
in the House and in the Committee on the Whole. The bill, as amended, shall be 
considered as the original bill for the purpose of further amendment and shall 
be considered as read. No further amendment to the bill, as amended, shall be in 
order except those printed in part B of the report of the Committee on Rules. 
Each further amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, 
may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as 
read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided 
and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to 
amendment except as specified in the report, and shall not be subject to a 
demand for division of the question in the House or in the Committee of the 
Whole. All points of order against such further amendments are waived. At the 
conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise 
and report the bill, as amended, to the House with such further amendments as 
may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion 
except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.77 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

Received: December 31, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8n4n-315c

Comments Due: January 19, 2016

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2015-0017

Claims Procedure for Plans Providing Disability Benefits

Comment On: EBSA-2015-0017-0001

Claims Procedure for Plans Providing Disability Benefits

Document: EBSA-2015-0017-DRAFT-0009

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-29295

Submitter Information

Name: Connie Faast

Address: 

302 Lemon Avenue

Marathon, FL, 33050

Email: sconrad302@aol.com

Phone: 305 684-8997

General Comment

Subject Line: "RIN-1210-AB39" Department of Labor

1. Included in Section 503 (3): to include guidelines for a case which has been approved by the 

long term disability company, be required to continue the policy/payments unless notified with 

prior written cancellation notification from the long term disability company. 

2. These medical decisions/determinations of denial should be made by a person with certified 

medical training.

3. Long Term Disability Insurance Manuals must quote required state or federal laws.