alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1013 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1013

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the payment to 
States of plot allowances for certain veterans eligible for burial in a 
     national cemetery who are buried in cemeteries of such States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 12, 2001

   Mr. Biden introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the payment to 
States of plot allowances for certain veterans eligible for burial in a 
     national cemetery who are buried in cemeteries of such States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF PLOT OR INTERMENT ALLOWANCE.

    Section 2303 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(c)(1) Subject to paragraph (3), the Secretary shall pay to any 
State, or agency or political subdivision of a State, a plot or 
interment allowance of $150 for the burial of any veteran who--
            ``(A) is eligible for burial in a national cemetery under 
        section 2402 of this title; and
            ``(B) is buried (without charge for the cost of a plot or 
        interment) in a cemetery, or a section of a cemetery, that--
                    ``(i) is used solely for the interment of persons 
                eligible for burial in a national cemetery; and
                    ``(ii) is owned by such State, or agency or 
                political subdivision.
    ``(2) The payment of a plot or interment allowance under this 
subsection shall be in addition to any benefits provided under section 
2302 or 2307 of this title, or subsection (a).
    ``(3) The Secretary may not pay a plot or interment allowance under 
this subsection for the burial of any veteran for which the Secretary 
pays a plot or interment allowance under subsection (b)(1).''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
23.1








CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8, (File No. 333-61895, File No. 333-55970) and Form S-3,( File No. 333-140968
, File No. 333-140969 and , File No. 333-140974) of  Ampal – American
Israel Corporation of our report dated March 8, 2010 relating to the financial
statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
which appears in this Form 10-K.




Tel-Aviv,
      Israel
            /s/ Kesselman &
      KesslmanMarch 8,
      2010
            Certified Public
      Accountants (Isr.)A
      member of PricewaterhouseCoopers International
  Limited
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| The      Employee acknowledges receipt of the Plan and a Prospectus relating to the      Option, and further acknowledges that he or she has reviewed this      Agreement and the related documents and accepts the provisions      thereof. |

| The      Employee acknowledges receipt of the Plan and a Prospectus relating to the      Option, and further acknowledges that he or she has reviewed this      Agreement and the related documents and accepts the provisions      thereof. |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----
#### Mary Wetmore, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. George C. Wetmore and others, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed on opinion of Barrett, J., without costs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

RANDY MERWIN STONE, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Respondent. 

No. 83222 

FILED 

JAN 1 4 2022 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a 

motion to vacate a judgment of conviction. Eighth Judicial District Court, 

Clark County; Michael Villani, Judge. 

Our review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. The 

right to appeal is statutory; where no statute or court rule provides for an 

appeal, no right to appeal exists. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 

P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from 

a motion to vacate a judgment of conviction. The grounds for relief asserted 

in the motion had to be raised in a postconviction petition for a writ of 

habeas corpus. NRS 34.724(2)(a), (b) (providing that except for a direct 

appeal from the judgment of conviction or a motion that is incident to the 

proceedings in the district court, a habeas corpus petition is the exclusive 

remedy to challenge the validity of a conviction or sentence); Harris v. State, 

1We express no opinion whether appellant can satisfy the procedural 

requirements of NRS Chapter 34. 

22.. - eltA6sSUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) l947A calm> 
C.J. 

Parraguirre 

130 Nev. 435, 438-39, 329 P.3d 619, 622 (2014) (discussing the exclusiveremedy provision and exceptions to it). Accordingly, we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

i AtiLk c-ez,it,t-,.. J. 

Hardesty 

Poe.. 

Pickering 7 J. 

cc: Hon Michael Villani, District Judge 

Randy Merwin Stone 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A
Page | of 1

LEGAL PROCESS PD IeYg/2-
PUBLICATION & REGULATORS BEG SHR AUG 4 2919
NCH.

IAs of: August 04, 2010

PUBLIC ptatus: Posted

Posted: August 04, 2010
SUBMISSION racking No, 2007 820r 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0014
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: William Brett Richardson
Address:
Arlington, VA,

General Comment

We all know that the health care bill passed by congress is full of errors and oversights. It was
certainly never intended to be a perfect piece of legislation, but more of a map for regulators to
follow (whether one agrees with it or not). Certainly Congress did not intend to allow insurance
companies to leverage the interim period to 2014 to raise rates to small associations with little
recorse, and the small associations only recourse to be to change companies. By changing
companies due to this potential and likely rate increase, the small association suddenly loses its
grandfathered in status. This is inequitable and an unfair outcome that you can correct with
clarifying regulations.

https://fdms.erulemaking. net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 8/4/2010
H. Res. 579

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 10, 2002.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 5010) making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30,

2003, and for other purposes. All points of order against the

conference report and against its consideration are waived.

The conference report shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
----

(2004/C 84 E/0406)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0279/04

by Elly Plooij-van Gorsel (ELDR) to the Commission

(5 February 2004)

Subject:   Embryo and stem-cell research

In May 2003, I put to the Commission a written question (E-1494/03 (1)) concerning expressions of interest in connection with embryo and stem-cell research under the Sixth Framework Programme.

In its answer, the Commission states that of the 2 000 expressions of interest submitted concerning Priority 1 roughly 80 relate to stem-cell research (animal or human stem-cells).

In connection with Thematic Priority 1, 26 proposals relating to stem-cell research have been received. Three of those proposals would involve the use of preserved or isolated human embryo stem cells grown in culture.

The moratorium ran out on 31 December 2003, with the result that the EU can now subsidise stem-cell research.

In this context, can the Commission answer the following questions:

Answer given by Mr Busquin on behalf of the Commission

(15 March 2004)

The results of the evaluation of the first call for proposals under the Sixth Research Framework Programme show there are currently 18 projects which may receive Community funding and which contain at least one research aspect involving the use of human stem cells. This number must still be regarded as preliminary and not final since some projects are still at the negotiating stage.

Twelve of these projects have been allocated to the thematic priority ‘Life sciences, genomics and biotechnology for health’ and six to the priority ‘Nanotechnologies and nano-sciences, knowledge-based multifunctional materials and new production processes and devices’ (tissue engineering projects).

With regard to research projects which involve human embryo stem cells, there are only two under the priority ‘Life sciences, genomics and biotechnology for health’. In both cases, researchers wish to use lines of human embryo stem cells which were recorded in the register of the human embryo stem cells of the US National Institutes of Health (2) and were derived before 9 August 2001. The teams which wish to use these lines are based in Germany and Italy in the case of one project, and in Finland in the case of the other. These data cannot in any way be regarded as final since the negotiation of these two projects has not yet been completed and the Programme Committee set up pursuant to Article 6.3 of the Specific Programme Integrating and Strengthening the European Research Area has not yet agreed to give them funding.

----

(1)OJ C 33 E, 6.2.2004, p. 127.

(2)  http://stemcells.nih.gov/registry/index.asp

----
REG-/4 Pt 91-09
FES 9 2 2010
LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION

Page 1 of 1

PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS As of: February 22, 2010

BRANCH Received: February 20, 2010

Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION [restes: Fesruary 22, 2010

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0006

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants & Beneficiaries in

Retirement Plans

Comment On: IRS-2010-0006-0001

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in

Retirement Plans

Document: IRS-2010-0006-0037
Comment on FR Doc # N/A

Submitter Information

Name: lester wilbern johnson
Address:
6483 south co rd 60sw
greensburg, IN, 47240
Email: lwj@decaturwb.com
Phone: 812-591-2697
Fax: na
Submitter's Representative: michael pence
Organization: na

General Comment

To Whom It Concerns;
Hands off our retirement funds | PERIOD
Lester Johnson

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call-...

2/22/2010
# Iris Oifigiúil L 318/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0839 |
| --- | --- |
| Iris Oifigiúil
  an Aontais Eorpaigh | L 318 |
| | |
| An t-eagrán Gaeilge | Reachtaíocht | Imleabhar 649 Meán Fómhair 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0839

Iris Oifigiúil

an Aontais Eorpaigh

L 318

An t-eagrán Gaeilge

Reachtaíocht

Imleabhar 649 Meán Fómhair 2021

---

| Clár | | Ceartúcháin | Leathanach |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Ceartúchán ar Rialachán (AE) 2021/1099 ón gCoimisiún an 5 Iúil 2021 lena leasaítear Iarscríbhinní II agus III a ghabhann le Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1223/2009 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle maidir le táirgí cosmaideacha ( IO L 238, 6.7.2021 )
  (IO L Eagrán Speisialta Gaeilge L 238, lch. 31) | 1 |

Clár

Ceartúcháin

Leathanach

*

Ceartúchán ar Rialachán (AE) 2021/1099 ón gCoimisiún an 5 Iúil 2021 lena leasaítear Iarscríbhinní II agus III a ghabhann le Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1223/2009 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle maidir le táirgí cosmaideacha ( IO L 238, 6.7.2021 )
  (IO L Eagrán Speisialta Gaeilge L 238, lch. 31)

( IO L 238, 6.7.2021 )

(IO L Eagrán Speisialta Gaeilge L 238, lch. 31)

1

| GA | Tagraíonn gníomhartha a bhfuil a dteidil i gcló éadrom do bhainistiú cúrsaí talmhaíochta ó lá go lá agus go ginearálta bíonn tréimhse theoranta bailíochta i gceist leo.
  Tá teidil na ngníomhartha eile i gcló trom agus tagann réiltín rompu. |
| --- | --- |

GA

Tagraíonn gníomhartha a bhfuil a dteidil i gcló éadrom do bhainistiú cúrsaí talmhaíochta ó lá go lá agus go ginearálta bíonn tréimhse theoranta bailíochta i gceist leo.

Tá teidil na ngníomhartha eile i gcló trom agus tagann réiltín rompu.

---

Ceartúcháin

| 9.9.2021 | GA | Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh | L 318/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2021

GA

Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh

L 318/1

---

Ceartúchán ar Rialachán (AE) 2021/1099 ón gCoimisiún an 5 Iúil 2021 lena leasaítear Iarscríbhinní II agus III a ghabhann le Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1223/2009 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle maidir le táirgí cosmaideacha

(
  Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh L 238 an 6 Iúil 2021
  )

(IO L Eagrán Speisialta Gaeilge L 238, lch. 31)

Leathanach 31, an Iarscríbhinn, pointe (2) lena gcuirtear iontráil 321 le hIarscríbhinn III a ghabhann le Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1223/2009, an fonóta faoi bhun an tábla, an dara habairt:

in ionad:

“Maidir le táirgí chun gruaig a ruaimniú agus táirgí féin-donnúcháin ina bhfuil an tsubstaint sin agus nach gcomhlíonann na srianta, ní chuirfear ar mhargadh an Aontais iad ón 22 Aibreán 2022 amach.”

léitear:

“Maidir le táirgí chun gruaig a ruaimniú agus táirgí féin-donnúcháin ina bhfuil an tsubstaint sin agus nach gcomhlíonann na srianta, ní chuirfear ar fáil ar mhargadh an Aontais iad ón 22 Aibreán 2022 amach.”

---
Merrimack,

June, 1900.

#### McConnell *v.*Cate.

Tire right to impound cattle does not depend upon the extent oí the damage done hy them.

Replevin, for four calves. Facts found by the court. The defendant impounded four calves found doing damage in his inclosure. The damage consisted in eating some apples that had fallen from the trees, and cropping and treading down grass, and did not exceed ten cents in actual value. Upon these facts a verdict for the plaintiff was found, which the defendant moved to set aside for error in the application of the law to the facts.

*Almon F. Burbank,*for the plaintiff.

*Walter D. Hardy*and *Sargent & Niles,*for the defendant.

Wallace, J.

Under the common law, one had the right of “ distraining another’s cattle damage feasant, that is, doing damage, or trespassing, upon his land.” 3 Bl. Com. 6. A similar right is given by our statute which provides that “ a person may impound any swine, neat cattle, horses, sheep, or other creatures doing damage in his inclosure.” P. S., *c.*144, *s.*1. Both under the common law and the statute, the essential prerequisite to the right to impound is that the animals must be doing damage when taken. The finding of fact that the calves when impounded were doing damage in the defendant’s inclosure is conclusive in favor of lfis right to impound them. Although the damages were small, yet they were actual, and therefore were sufficient to justify the defendant in impounding the ammals.

The case of *Osgood*v. *Green,*33 N. H. 318, relied upon by the plaintiff, is not in conflict with the views here expressed, because in that case there not only was no finding that the animal im*297pounded was doing damage when taken, but, on the contrary, there was an express finding that no damage was done.

*Judgment for the defendant.*

Chase, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (9.01 MB)
 
 Air Forces Central Command Fly Away Security Team U.S. AFCENT U.S. Air Force C-130J aircraft Bagram Airfield Bagram C-130J Super Hercules team Air Force Afghanistan usaf Security Forces maintainers FAST aircrew
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
# Επίσημη Εφημερίδα C 154/11 Ι

| | ISSN 1725-2415 |
| --- | --- |
| Επίσημη Εφημερίδα
  της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | C 154 |
| | |
| Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα | Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες | 47ό έτος11 Ιουνίου 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2415

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα

της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

C 154

Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα

Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες

47ό έτος11 Ιουνίου 2004

---

| Ανακοίνωση αριθ | Περιεχόμενα | Σελίδα |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Ανακοινώσεις |
| | Επιτροπή |
| 2004/C 154/1 | Ισοτιμίες του ευρώ | 1 |

Ανακοίνωση αριθ

Περιεχόμενα

Σελίδα

I   Ανακοινώσεις

Επιτροπή

2004/C 154/1

Ισοτιμίες του ευρώ

1

| EL | |
| --- | --- |

EL

---

I Ανακοινώσεις

Επιτροπή

| 11.6.2004 | EL | Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | C 154/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2004

EL

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

C 154/1

---

Ισοτιμίες του ευρώ (1)

10 Ιουνίου 2004

(2004/C 154/01)

1 ευρώ=

| | Nομισματική μονάδα | Ισοτιμία |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | δολάριο ΗΠΑ | 1,2052 |
| JPY | ιαπωνικό γιεν | 131,84 |
| DKK | δανική κορόνα | 7,4384 |
| GBP | λίρα στερλίνα | 0,6614 |
| SEK | σουηδική κορόνα | 9,1475 |
| CHF | ελβετικό φράγκο | 1,5126 |
| ISK | ισλανδική κορόνα | 87,12 |
| NOK | νορβηγική κορόνα | 8,28 |
| BGN | βουλγαρικό λεβ | 1,9558 |
| CYP | κυπριακή λίρα | 0,5828 |
| CZK | τσεχική κορόνα | 31,33 |
| EEK | εσθονική κορόνα | 15,6466 |
| HUF | ουγγρικό φιορίνι | 253,10 |
| LTL | λιθουανικό λίτας | 3,4528 |
| LVL | λεττονικό λατ | 0,6536 |
| MTL | μαλτέζικη λίρα | 0,4249 |
| PLN | πολωνικό ζλότι | 4,5877 |
| ROL | ρουμανικό λέι | 40 865 |
| SIT | σλοβενικό τόλαρ | 239,14 |
| SKK | σλοβακική κορόνα | 39,87 |
| TRL | τουρκική λίρα | 1 806 800 |
| AUD | αυστραλιανό δολάριο | 1,7374 |
| CAD | καναδικό δολάριο | 1,6381 |
| HKD | δολάριο Χονγκ Κονγκ | 9,3975 |
| NZD | νεοζηλανδικό δολάριο | 1,9120 |
| SGD | δολάριο Σιγκαπούρης | 2,0637 |
| KRW | νοτιοκορεατικό γουόν | 1 396,96 |
| ZAR | νοτιοαφρικανικό ραντ | 8,0189 |

Nομισματική μονάδα

Ισοτιμία

USD

δολάριο ΗΠΑ

1,2052

JPY

ιαπωνικό γιεν

131,84

DKK

δανική κορόνα

7,4384

GBP

λίρα στερλίνα

0,6614

SEK

σουηδική κορόνα

9,1475

CHF

ελβετικό φράγκο

1,5126

ISK

ισλανδική κορόνα

87,12

NOK

νορβηγική κορόνα

8,28

BGN

βουλγαρικό λεβ

1,9558

CYP

κυπριακή λίρα

0,5828

CZK

τσεχική κορόνα

31,33

EEK

εσθονική κορόνα

15,6466

HUF

ουγγρικό φιορίνι

253,10

LTL

λιθουανικό λίτας

3,4528

LVL

λεττονικό λατ

0,6536

MTL

μαλτέζικη λίρα

0,4249

PLN

πολωνικό ζλότι

4,5877

ROL

ρουμανικό λέι

40 865

SIT

σλοβενικό τόλαρ

239,14

SKK

σλοβακική κορόνα

39,87

TRL

τουρκική λίρα

1 806 800

AUD

αυστραλιανό δολάριο

1,7374

CAD

καναδικό δολάριο

1,6381

HKD

δολάριο Χονγκ Κονγκ

9,3975

NZD

νεοζηλανδικό δολάριο

1,9120

SGD

δολάριο Σιγκαπούρης

2,0637

KRW

νοτιοκορεατικό γουόν

1 396,96

ZAR

νοτιοαφρικανικό ραντ

8,0189

---

(1)

Πηγή: Ισοτιμίες αναφοράς που δημοσιεύονται από την Ευρωπαϊκή Κεντρική Τράπεζα.

---
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.71 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil