alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21

                     SECOND AMENDMENT OF EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT


THIS AGREEMENT is made this 5th day of December 2003

BETWEEN:          CONSOLIDATED WATER CO. LTD., a Cayman Islands company having
                  its registered office at Trafalgar Place, West Bay Road, P.O.
                  Box 1114 GT, Grand Cayman, BWI ("the Company")

AND:              GREGORY S. MCTAGGART of 422 Ocean Club, P.O. Box 30984 SMB,
                  Grand Cayman, BWI ("the Vice President")

WHEREAS:

         A.       The Company and the Vice President entered into an employment
                  contract dated the 19th of August 1998, which was amended by
                  amendment of the employment contract dated the 7th of April
                  2000 ("the Employment Contract")

         B.       The parties are now desirous of amending the same, in
                  accordance with the terms of this Agreement, in order to
                  change the date on which the exercise price of options to
                  purchase Ordinary Shares granted to the Vice President is
                  established.

NOW IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants contained herein the parties agreed
that the Employment Contract shall be amended and/or rectified as follows:

                  1. Clause 4 (c) of the First Amendment of the Employment
                  Contract shall be amended as follows;

                  Delete the words "average of the closing market price of the
                  Company's Ordinary shares on each of the first seven trading
                  days in the month of October of that financial year" and
                  substitute "closing price of the Company's Ordinary shares on
                  the 31st of December of the relevant financial year".

THE PARTIES HERETO have set their hands and seals the day and date first above
written.



<PAGE>



SIGNED AND SEALED in the presence of: )     CONSOLIDATED WATER CO. LTD.
                                      )
                                      )
                                      )     /s/ Frederick McTaggart
                                      )     -------------------------------
/s/ Brent Santa                       )     Frederick McTaggart
-----------------------------------   )     -------------------------------
witness
Brent Santha

SIGNED AND SEALED in the presence of: )
                                      )
                                      )
                                      )
                                      )
/s/ Brent Santha                      )     /s/ Gregory McTaggart
-----------------------------------   )     -------------------------------
witness                                     Gregory S. McTaggart
Brent Santha
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION









Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Michael W. Laphen, Chief Executive Officer of
Computer Sciences Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that:




(1)  The
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 3, 2009, (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: May
      28, 2009
            
            /s/Michael
      W. Laphen
              Chief
      Executive
Officer
EXHIBIT 23(A)
                                                                   -------------






                              ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Spire Corporation:


       We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 of Spire Corporation and subsidiaries of our report dated March 20,
2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Spire Corporation as of
December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three year period ended December 31, 2002, which report appears in the December
31, 2002, annual report on Form 10-KSB of Spire Corporation.

KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 20, 2003
steam_record - Re: Effluent limitations Guidelines ICR extension request - Georgia Power Co. 

 

Greetings, 

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric effluent 

guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case 

basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date

of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely, 

-----"Evans, Bill R." <WREVANS@southernco.com> wrote: ----- 

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Evans, Bill R." <WREVANS@southernco.com> 

Date: 07/01/2010 09:02AM 

Subject: Effluent limitations Guidelines ICR extension request - Georgia Power Co. 

Dear Ms. Alicea, 

Attached is a request for extension of the deadline for submittal of 

From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Evans, Bill R." <WREVANS@southernco.com>

Date: 7/2/2010 7:45 PM

Subject: Re: Effluent limitations Guidelines ICR extension request - Georgia Power Co.

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C2E41D3D... 4/14/2011
responses to the effluent limitations guidelines questionnaire for 

all of Georgia Power Company's plants. A paper copy has been 

submitted to you through U.S. Postal Service. 

Thank you for your consideration. Please call me if you have 

questions. 

Bill Evans 

Environmental Principal 

Georgia Power Company 

404-506-7031 

[attachment "Georgia Power extension request.pdf" removed by Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US] 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C2E41D3D... 4/14/2011
**Exhibit
      32.1**








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of South Jersey
      Gas Company (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Edward J. Graham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Edward J. Graham


-----------------------------------------------------


Name:
      Edward J. Graham


Title:
      Chief Executive Officer


August
      9,
      2006
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robert S. Kendall, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Sentex Sensing
Technology, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  April 26, 2004

/s/ Robert S. Kendall, Chief Executive Officer
----------------------------------------------
Signature & Title

                                       17
# April 11 Red Sea Update

/ Published April 11, 2024

April 11, 2024Release Number 20240411 - 02 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla. –**At approximately 1:00 p.m. (Sanaa time) on April 11, United States Central Command (CENTCOM) forces successfully engaged and destroyed one anti-ship ballistic missile (ASBM) launched over the Red Sea from Iranian-backed Houthi terrorist-controlled areas in Yemen.

There were no injuries or damage reported by U.S., coalition, or commercial ships.

It was determined the ASBM presented an imminent threat to U.S., coalition, and merchant vessels in the region. These actions are taken to protect freedom of navigation and make international waters safer and more secure for U.S., coalition, and merchant vessels.
---

---

Exhibit 23.10

CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Forms S-8, (File No.
333-61895, File No. 333-55970) and Forms S-3,( File No. 333-140968 , File No. 333-140969
and , File No. 333-140974) of our report dated March 27, 2006 relating to the financial
statements of Ophirtech Ltds 2005 Annual report to shareholders, which appears in
this Form 10-K of Ampal  American Israel Corporation.

Kesselman & Kesselman CPAs (ISR) A member of Pricewaterhouse Coopers International Limited

Tel-Aviv, Israel
29 March , 2007



---

---
****U.S.        Department of Justice****Bureau of Justice Statistics****
| **To the BJShome page**
**Publications**
**What's         new**Survey of State Prison Inmates, 1991 This study presents data about State prison inmates:  their background and families, criminal histories, gang membership, drug and alcohol use, HIV/AIDS infection, gun use and possession, sentence, time served, and participation in prison programs.  The report also presents data on the victims of violent inmates. Compiled from in depth interviews with a nationally representative sample of almost 14,000 State prisoners in 277 facilities in 45 States, this is the most comprehensive study to date of State prison inmate characteristics.   5/93   NCJ 136949     
**Press release** (14K)  |  **Acrobat file** (477K)  |   **ASCII text file** (129K)  **About the source data** | **Codebooks & data sets****To order paper version**
 Help for using BJS products**Return to the BJS home page | Go to the top of this page****Bureau of Justice StatisticsU.S. Department of Justicewww.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjsSend comments to askbjs@ojp.usdoj.govPage last revised on *August 12, 1998*** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
H. Res. 213

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 31, 2001.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2647) making appropriations for the Legislative Branch for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002,

and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be

dispensed with. Points of order against consideration of the

bill for failure to comply with clause 4(c) of rule XIII are

waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall

not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on

Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The bill shall

be considered as read. Points of order against provisions in

the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are

waived. No amendment to the bill shall be in order except

those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accom-
2

•HRES 213 EH

panying this resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered

only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the

report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an

opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not

be subject to a demand for division of the question in the

House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order

against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion of

consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall

rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments

as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be

considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to

final passage without intervening motion except one motion

to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
----

(2004/C 84 E/0268)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3148/03

by Ilda Figueiredo (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(23 October 2003)

Subject:   Support for institutions working with women and girls who are victims of prostitution

In Portugal, there are institutions dedicated to the prevention and social integration of women and girls who are victims of prostitution. Shortage of funding poses real problems.

Can the Commission answer the following:

Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(12 December 2003)

As regards the first question concerning the Daphne programme, the following information can be provided.

Since 1997 nine projects carried out by Portuguese organisations were financed under the Daphne programme for a total of EUR 680 000. Information on each of them is being transmitted direct to the Honourable Member and to Parliament's Secretariat.

In addition, 59 Portuguese organisations or local authorities were partners in 32 Daphne projects.

With regard to Community aid for institutions which work on the prevention of prostitution and the social reintegration of women who are victims of prostitution, the European Social Fund can co-finance — under the Community Support Framework (CSF) III — measures for the benefit of disadvantaged groups in general. Special reference should be made to the operational programme ‘employment, training and social development’, which, in section five on social development, provides for measures to encourage social and occupational integration of the most vulnerable groups in society.

With regard to Community action in relation to sexually transmissible diseases, the main financing tool at present is the ‘public health’ action programme (2003-2008). The Commission has not yet taken a final decision on the projects accepted for financing following an initial call for proposals under this programme and so cannot yet state its position on participation by Portugal. With regard to precursor programmes, and in particular the programme on the prevention of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), the projects financed by the Community usually cover almost all Member States. Given that the Community aid is granted to the project coordinator, who, for his part, is responsible for distributing it to the project partners, the Commission cannot put a figure on the amount of aid granted to the Portuguese partners under this programme.

----
SUPREME COURT.

#### Second National Bank of Utica agt. William Wells, impleaded.

*Complaint by*corporation—answ&r— *demurrer.*

In an action by an incorporated bank, where the complaint contains no allegation that the plaintiff is a corporation, or entitled to sue as such, the objection is properly taken by answer.

A demurrer can only be interposed where it affirmatively appears upon the face of the complaint that the plaintiff has *not*legal capacity to sue.

*At Chambers,*June, 1877.

Motion for judgment upon answer alleged.to be frivolous. The action was upon a promissory note owned by the plaintiff. The complaint did not allege that the plaintiff was an incorporation. The answer was substantially as follows: “ First. That said plaintiff ought not to have or maintain this action against this defendant for the reason that said complaint does not show that said plaintiff is an individual or a corporation, or that said plaintiff has any legal capacity to sue, and this objection is taken by answer and not by demurrer for the reason that said complaint does not show' on its face affirmatively that said plaintiff has legal capacity to sue. Second. Said defendant, impleaded as aforesaid, denies that said plaintiff is an individual or a corporation created by or under statute of this state.”

*E.*Fink, for plaintiff.

*R. Carroll,*for defendant.

*243Hardin, *J.*

The complaint does not allege that the plaintiff is a corporation having legal capacity to sue. It does not allege that it is incorporated under the laws of this state. Therefore, section 3 (2 *R. S. [Edm. ed.],*477) does not apply. The objection can not be taken by demurrer, because the court of appeals have so held in *The Phoenix Bank*agt. *Donnell*(40 *N. Y.,*410). The complaint can only prove what it alleges, no allegations being inserted that it has legal capacity to sue. Therefore, no proof of that fact could be given. The objection by answer is proper, and therefore the answer cannot be held to be frivolous. The motion must be denied, with ten dollars costs to defendant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from  financial statements for the nine months ended June 30, 2000
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             570
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        112
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   682
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     682
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,135
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           601
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,054)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       682
<SALES>                                            365
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   365
<CGS>                                              145
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      145
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,216
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,996)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,996)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,996)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)


</TABLE>
#### § 831.53 Authority of Director, Office of Marine Safety.

The Director, Office of Marine Safety, subject to the provisions of § 831.52 of this part and part 800 of this chapter, may order an investigation into any major marine casualty or marine casualty.