alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 164 (Friday, August 25, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 58253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18441]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Tuesday, August 22, 2023--10:00 a.m. Open; and Tuesday, 
August 29, 2023--11:00 a.m. Closed (See MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED for 
each meeting).

PLACE: The meetings will be held remotely, and in person at 4330 East-
West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814.

STATUS: Commission Meetings--Open to the Public (10:00 a.m.) and Closed 
to the Public (11:00 a.m.)

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    Briefing Matter:
    Notice of Proposed Rulemaking--Safety Standard for Nursing Pillows.
    To attend virtually, please use the following link and details 
below: https://cpsc.webex.com/cpsc/j.php?MTID=mf92f68fa850e5d90839f2d57480973e5.
    Join by phone: +1-415-527-5035 US Toll.
    Access code: 276 320 94287.
    Briefing Matter:
    Closed meeting topic.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Alberta E. Mills, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East-West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-504-7479 (Office) or 240-863-8938 
(Cell).

    Dated: August 22, 2023.
Alberta E. Mills,
Commission Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-18441 Filed 8-23-23; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.57 MB)
 
 USARCENT Public Affairs 88th Readiness Division 88th RD U.S. Army Reserve JBLM USAR U.S. Central Command USARCENT U.S. CENTCOM Illinois U.S. Army Central ARCENT Chicago 304th Public Affairs Detachment 304th PAD Warriors Wanted Joint Base Lewis-McChordIraq Troops Divestment Class 9 Equipment TC Lincoln
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

Government Services Corp. 

Under Contract No. SP0600-12-D-4552 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60392 

Gregory R. Rauch, Esq. 

Magyar, Rauch & Associates PLLC 

Moscow, ID 

Daniel K. Poling, Esq. 

DLA Chief Trial Attorney 

Jared M. Miller, Esq. 

Kathryn M. Kelley, Esq. 

Trial Attorneys 

DLA Energy 

Fort Belvoir, VA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 4 October 20 I 7 

DA YID D' ALESSANDRIS 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60392, Appeal of Government Services 

Corp., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
Docket: EBSA-2010-0007 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in Retirement 

Plans 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0007-0001 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options 

Document: EBSA-2010-0007-DRAFT-0043 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: Jeremy Dover 

Address: 

445 Poplar Leaf Dr 

Edgewater, MD, 21037 

Email: doverjm@gmail.com 

General Comment 

I have been responsible for growing a business from the ground up until we had 30 employees. One tool we 

used to attract employees was a 401(k) plan for which the company provided an aggressive contribution (up to 

10% of the employee's salary). 

Based on this experience, I would like to provide three points for your consideration on why I think the 

proposal to enforce a "lifetime income" option is a bad idea. 

1. My employees already have a "lifetime income" plan: Social Security. Understanding that there are other 

insurance components of the cost, between the employee and employer contributions my employees are 

already "investing" more than 10% of their compensation, i.e. the majority of their retirement savings, into a 

"lifetime income" plan. 

2. One key benefit of the 401(k) for the employer is specifically denigrated in the RFI, namely that "participants 

in defined contribution plans bear the investment risk". This RFI seems to assume that by issuing a regulation 

employers will be forced to return to "defined benefit" plans...however I can assure that this will instead lead to 

employers not providing retirement plans at all, particularly given the almost weekly news of the trouble that 

large pension funds are experiencing. There is no way that I as an employer would ever take the risk of 

assuring a defined benefit stream for life in the current uncertain economic environment. 

3. Shifting from defined contribution to defined benefit effectively shifts the burden of funding retirement from 

the old to the young...if a company needs to put funds into a retirement fund to support a defined benefit, 

that's a future employee who will be fired because the company cannot make payroll. The current funding 

model for Social Security and our national debt already penalize my children. This regulation would penalize my 

children in two ways: both in the lack of future opportunity, as well as my inability to pass on excess savings. 

Thank you for the opportunity to comment. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: March 01, 2010 

Received: February 22, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80aa9c32 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=Print&PrintId=0900006480aa9c3... 3/1/2010
Page 1 of 1

LEGAL PROGH 3 PS DHISION =p — ppey,-
PUBLICATION a eLULATIONS «f= CLBV ZO SEP 6 8 z010
BRANCH

IAs of: September 08, 2010

PUBLIC Status Posted

Posted: September 08, 2010
SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathe-ed
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0857
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

a,

Submitter Information

Name: Bethany Isabelle Georgia Peabody
Address:

4749 2nd Ave N

Unit A

St. Petersburg, FL, 33713
Email: bethanyinflorida@yahoo.com
Phone: 727-322-2424
Organization: ChiroVoice

General Comment

See attached file(s)

Attachments

IRS-2010-0010-0857.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=Pr..._ 9/8/2010


16 August, 2010

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to
Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

Sincerely,

Bethany Peabody
IV 

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 534 

Congratulating Arnold Palmer for his service to the Nation in promoting 

excellence and good sportsmanship in golf. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 

Mr. BACA submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Arnold Palmer for his service to the Nation 

in promoting excellence and good sportsmanship in golf. 

Whereas Arnold Palmer is a world famous golf professional, 

a highly-successful business executive, a prominent advertising spokesman, a devoted husband, father, and grandfather, and a man with a common touch that has made 

him one of the most popular and accessible public figures 

in history; 

Whereas Arnold Palmer, chosen Athlete of the Decade for the 

1960s in a national Associated Press poll, amassed 92 

championships in professional competition of national or 

international stature by the end of 1993, 61 of which 

came on the Professional Golf Association Tour; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 534 IH 

Whereas Arnold Palmer’s magnetic personality and unfailing 

sense of kindness and thoughtfulness have endeared him 

to millions throughout the world; 

Whereas Arnold Palmer has been the recipient of countless 

honors including virtually every national award in golf 

and both the Hickok Athlete of the Year and Sports 

Illustrated’s Sportsman of the Year awards; 

Whereas Arnold Palmer served as Honorary National Chairman of the March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation 

for 20 years and played a major role in the fund-raising 

drive that led to the creation of the Arnold Palmer Hospital for Children and Women in Orlando; and 

Whereas Arnold Palmer retired from the Masters with grace 

by playing his last of 48 Masters Tournaments on April 

14, 2002, where he was given 2 standing ovations as he 

approached the 18th green: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates Arnold Palmer for his service to the Nation in 

3 promoting excellence and good sportsmanship in golf. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
§ 92.23 Collection. ( a ) A debt shall be collected in a lump sum or by installment deductions at officially established pay intervals from an employee's current pay account, unless the employee and the DOT operating element agree to alternative arrangements for payment (see § 92.11(b)(9) describing such voluntary repayment arrangements). The alternative arrangement shall be in writing, signed by both the employee and the chief of the appropriate accounting or finance office, and shall be documented in the DOT operating element's files.
( b ) Under 31 U.S.C. 3716 and 4 CFR 102.3(b)(3), agencies may not initiate offset to collect a debt more than 10 years after the Government's right to collect the debt accrued, unless facts material to the Government's rights to collect the debt were not known by the DOT operating element's official or officials charged with the responsibility to discover and collect the debt.
Page 1 of2 

LEGALPROC

PUBLICAnON.e:~NG DIVISION 

BRANCHGULATIONS 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION 

As of: August 25, 2010 

Received: August 10, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 25, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2dlbc 

Comments Due: August 16, 2010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathel"ed 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Statu:; as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0364 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

----------------------------------------------------------------...... 


Submitter Information 

Name: Stephen C Provost 

Address: 

Brewer, 

Government Agency Type: Federal 

Government Agency: HHS 

------------------------------------------------------------------,---­

General Comment 

August 10, 2010 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status 

as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-2010­

0010-0001). 

With over 18 years of experience in the healthcare field I have seen the abuses that insurers 

commit when they are allowed to take advantage of self serving loopholes. I believe the 

consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally important and should 

be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort should be made to inCrE!aSe 

the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via 

the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would extend these protections to 

https:llfdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency Icomponentlsubmitter InfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/25/2010 
:Page 2 of2 

consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not be weakened or reduced in 

any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments offered by the American 

Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these regulations. 

Sincerely 

Steve Provost 

https:/Ifdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency IcomponentisubmitterInfoCoverPage ?Call=... 8/25/2010
EXHIBIT 23

                              ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Zygo Corporation:

     We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-4433, No. 33-62087, No. 33-57060, No. 33-20880, and No. 33-34619 on Forms
S-8 of Zygo Corporation of our reports dated August 7, 1998, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of Zygo Corporation and subsidiaries as of June 30,
1998, and 1997 and the related consolidated statements of earnings,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows and related schedule for each of the years
in the three-year period ended June 30, 1998, which reports appear in or are
incorporated by reference into the June 30, 1998 Annual Report on Form 10-K405
of Zygo Corporation.

KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Hartford, Connecticut
September 23, 1998
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 25, 2015

NO. 03-14-00306-CR

Wesley Eugene Perkins, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment of guilty rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed the 

record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial 

court’s judgment of guilty. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of guilty. 

Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
# CENTCOM Forces Intercept More Than 2,000 Assault Rifles Shipped from Iran

/ Published Jan. 10, 2023

**TAMPA, Fla. -** On Jan. 6, U.S. Central Command forces intercepted a stateless dhow in the Gulf of Oman smuggling more than 2,000 AK-47 assault rifles while transiting international waters from Iran to Yemen.The vessel was sailing on a route historically used to traffic weapons to the Houthis in Yemen. A team from the USS Chinook patrol coastal ship boarded the vessel with support from the Cyclone-class patrol ship USS Monsoon and the guided-missile destroyer USS The Sullivans.“The illegal flow of weapons through international waterways has a destabilizing effect on the region,” said Gen. Michael “Erik” Kurilla, CENTCOM commander.“We are committed to the security and stability of the region and the enforcement of international law,” Kurilla continued. “Alongside our partner forces, CENTCOM will deter and interdict this kind of lethal material into the region whether it comes by air, land, or sea.”“This shipment is part of a continued pattern of destabilizing activity from Iran,” said Vice Adm. Brad Cooper, commander of U.S. Naval Forces Central Command, U.S. 5th Fleet, and Combined Maritime Forces. “These threats have our attention. We remain vigilant in detecting any maritime activity that threatens freedom or compromises regional security.”

-30-
AMENDED

ALPHARMA INC.

EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN

(EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2002)

1.     Purpose.

The purpose of this Executive Bonus Plan is to foster continuing long-term growth in earnings of Alpharma Inc. by rewarding key executives for outstanding performance in the accomplishment of assigned goals through annual awards of cash bonuses.

 

2.     Definitions.

Actual Bonus Pool:  The aggregate sum available to pay Bonus Awards computed separately for each SBU and the Company Executives, as a group.

Base Salary:  The Participant''s annual base salary rate of earnings in effect as of 

December 31, of any Incentive Year.

Board of Directors:  The Board of Directors of the Company.

Bonus Award:  An amount awarded to a Participant pursuant to Section 4.

CEO:  The Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

CFO:   The Chief Financial Officer of the Company.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, September 29, 1995 (123), Para 123.27 Speaker and Minority Leader to Accept Resignations, Appoint Commissions]
[Page 1492]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.123.27  speaker and minority leader to accept resignations, appoint 
          commissions

  On motion of Mr. SHAYS, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That, notwithstanding any adjournment of the House until 
Tuesday, October 10, 1995, the Speaker and the Minority Leader be 
authorized to accept resignations and to make appointments to 
commissions, boards and committees duly authorized by law or by the 
House.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of 
Zitel Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 33-47697) of our reports dated 
December 16, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and 
financial statement schedule of Zitel Corporation as of September 30, 1998 
and 1997 and for the years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996, which 
reports are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
December 22, 1998
```

[House Report 107-490]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     107-490

======================================================================

 
 WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY S. 
          1372, EXPORT-IMPORT BANK REAUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2002

                                _______
                                

June 4, 2002.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 433]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 433, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution waives all points of order against the 
conference report to accompany S. 1372, the Export-Import Bank 
Reauthorization Act of 2002, and against its consideration.

                                  

```
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 1 April 2004

in Case C-237/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof): Freiburger Kommunalbauten GmbH Baugesellschaft & Co. KG v Ludwig Hofstetter, Ulrike Hofstetter (1)

(‘Directive 93/13/EEC - Unfair terms in consumer contracts - Contract for the building and supply of a parking space - Reversal of the order of performance of contractual obligations provided for under national law - Clause obliging the consumer to pay the price before the seller or supplier has performed his obligations - Obligation on the seller or supplier to provide a guarantee’)

(2004/C 106/19)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-237/02: reference to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Court of Justice) (Germany) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Freiburger Kommunalbauten GmbH Baugesellschaft & Co. KG and Ludger Hofstetter, Ulrike Hofstetter – on the interpretation of Article 3(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29) – the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of: P. Jann (Rapporteur), acting for the President of the Fifth Chamber, C.W.A. Timmermans, A. Rosas, A. La Pergola and S. von Bahr, Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 1 April 2004, in which it has ruled:

It is for the national court to decide whether a contractual term such as that at issue in the main proceedings satisfies the requirements for it to be regarded as unfair under Article 3(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts.

----

(1)OJ C 202 of 24.8.2002.

----