alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Cordele Sash, Door & Lumber Co. *v.*Wilson Lumber Co.

Eish, C. J.

1. A ground of a motion for a new trial, assigning error upon the admission of documentary evidence, will not be considered unless the evidence objected to be set forth, either literally or in substance, in the motion itself, or attached thereto as an exhibit. A mere reference in the motion to another part of the record where the evidence may be found will not suffice. *Hicks*v. *Webb,*127 *Ga.*170 (56 S. E. 307). In .the present case error is assigned upon the admission in evidence of an original amendment, with an exhibit attached thereto, filed by the defendant to an answer in a former suit between the same parties. In the motion for a new trial the evidence is referred to as follows: “Said amendment being incorporated in the brief of evidence in full, and forming pages 6-A, 6-B, 6-C, 6-D, 6-E, 6-E, 6-G, of said evidence.” The substance of the amendment is properly set forth, but the only reference to the ex-*291Mbit is “Exhibit A, a checking of certain lumber by Mr. Wilder.” What was contained in the body of the amendment tended to sustain the defendant’s answer in the present ease, and was, therefore, not hurtful to defendant. The only harm that could possibly result to the defendant from the admission of the evidence came from the exhibit, which was merely, referred to as stated above.

Argued July 1,

Decided August 14, 1907.

Complaint. Before Judge Littlejohn. Crisp superior court. October *25,*1906.

*Hill & Royal,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. H. Dorris*and *W. H. McKenzie,*contra.

2. Instructions of the court to the jury should be confined to the issues made by the pleadings in the-case. *Martin*v. *Nichols,*127 *Ga.*705 (56 S. E. 995). Therefore a failure of the court in its charge to present to the jury a contention of one of the parties not pertinent to any issue made by the pleadings is not cause for a new trial.

3. Mere failure of the court, in instructing the jury, to give the definitions of such words as “delivery” and “delivered” is not cause for a new trial. *Holmes*v. *Clisby,*121 *Ga.*241 (7) (48 S. E. 934), 104 Am. St. R. 103.

4. Plaintiff’s petition alleged that the property, for the value of which the action was brought, was converted by defendant on April 14, 1902, the evidence tended to support this allegation; the case was tried September 18, 1906, and the verdict in behalf of the plaintiff was for a given sum, with four and a half years’ interest thereon. *Held,*that there was no evidence to authorize a verdict finding interest for more than four years, five months, and four days; and a new trial is ordered, unless the defendant in error, within ten days after the filing of the remittitur, shall write off from the amount of interest as found in the verdict an. amount equal to the interest on the principal sum found in the verdict, for one month and four days, at seven per cent, per annum; in the event this is done, a new-trial is refused.

*Judgment affirmed, on condition. All*

*the Justices concur.*
#### Thomas B. Stocker, appellant, v. Nemaha Valley Drainage District, appellee.

Filed February 23, 1921.

No. 21239.

Judgment: Res Judicata. Issues once determined by a judgment cannot be relitigated in a subsequent action between tbe same parties.

Appeal from the district court for Nemaha county: John B. Raper, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*Stocker £ Foster,*for appellant.

*Kelligar £ Ferneau, contra.*

Per Ouriam.

This is a suit in equity to'require defendant, a public drainage district, to pay for and to maintain bridges across drainage ditches severing different parts of plaintiff’s farm. The ditches and the severances are parts of a public drainage improvement. Other equitable relief sought by plaintiff is the ordering of a levy on each acre of land in the drainage district to pay the necessary expenses of building and maintaining these bridges. One of the defenses pleaded is former adjudication. In this plea defendant sets up the pleadings, proofs and judgment in *Stocker v. Nemaha Valley Drainage District,*99 Neb. 38. The trial court sustained the plea of *res judicata*herein and dismissed the suit. Plaintiff has appealed.

The position of plaintiff in reply to the plea of *res judicata,*if correctly understood, may be summarized thus: The trial court in determining the former case, which was a condemnation proceeding, and the supreme court on appeal from the former judgment of the district court, adjudicated merely the inconvenience of plaintiff’s access to his severed lands, and set off such, mere inconvenience against the incidental benefits, while in the present case it is shown that there is, in the absence of a bridge, a total destruction of plaintiff’s access to a large *685tract of Ms severed land, and tMs amounts to a taking of Ms severed land, and tMs taking of severed land not required for drainage purposes was not, and cannot be, offset by incidental benefits. In other words, it is insisted that the trial court, in the present suit, did not distinguish between a total or partial denial of access and a mere inconvenience of access in the matter of offsetting benefits.

The power to organize drainage districts and to condemn land for that public purpose was granted by statute. The legislature evidently meant to allow the remedies of the landowners in condemnation proceedings to extend to compensation for all damages, including inconvenience to access, partial destruction of access,- and total destruction of access. All of these elements, as we understand the condemnation proceedings in the former action and the judgment therein, were pleaded, litigated, and determined. *Stocker v. Nemaha Valley Drainage District,*99 Neb. 38. If this is a correct view of the facts and the, law, the present action was properly dismissed by the trial court on the plea of *'res judicata.*

Affirmed.

Letton, J., not sitting.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.07 MB)
 
 The United States military has not and will not compromise training or equipping of any troops going into harm’s way the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff told the House Armed Services Committee today.
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 30, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 59921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18656]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington DC 20551-0001, not later than September 29, 2023.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco: (Joseph Cuenco, Assistant 
Vice President) Formations, Transactions and Enforcement, 101 Market 
Street, San Francisco, California 94105-1579. Comments can also be sent 
electronically to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b0c3d69ed6d9c3d39ed3dfddddd5dec4c39ed1c0c0dcd9d3d1c4d9dfdec3f0c3d69ed6c2d29edfc2d7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0a796c246c63796924696567676f647e79246b7a7a6663696b7e636564794a796c246c78682465786d">[email protected]</span></a>.
    1. Banc of California, Inc., Santa Ana, California; to acquire 
PacWest Bancorp, and thereby indirectly acquire Pacific Western Bank, 
both of Beverly Hills, California.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2023-18656 Filed 8-29-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 22


                             SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



                                                               Percentage
                                                               of voting
                                                               securities
                                 Incorporated                   owned by
                                   under the                    immediate
Name                               laws of       Parent          parent
----------------------------     ------------    -------------  ---------

CompuDyne Corporation *            Nevada        Registrant
CompuDyne Corp. of Maryland *      Maryland      CompuDyne Corp.   100%
Quanta Systems Corporation *       Connecticut   CompuDyne Corp.   100%
CompuDyne, Inc.**                  Delaware      CompuDyne Corp.   100%
MicroAssembly Systems, Inc.        Connecticut   CompuDyne Corp.   100%
Quanta SecurSystems, Inc.          Maryland      CompuDyne Corp.   100%



Note: 

* All subsidiaries of the Registrant as of December 31, 1996, are
included in the consolidated financial statements of the Registrant.

**  CompuDyne, Inc. filed for petition in bankruptcy on December 31,
1991.
# Úřední věstník C 154/11.

| | ISSN 1725-5163 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 154 |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Svazek 4711. června 2004 |

ISSN 1725-5163

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 154

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Svazek 4711. června 2004

---

| Oznámeníč. | Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Informace |
| | Komise |
| 2004/C 154/1 | Směnné kurzy vůči euro | 1 |

Oznámeníč.

Obsah

Strana

I   Informace

Komise

2004/C 154/1

Směnné kurzy vůči euro

1

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

I Informace

Komise

| 11.6.2004 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | C 154/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2004

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

C 154/1

---

Směnné kurzy vůči euro (1)

10. června 2004

(2004/C 154/01)

1 euro=

| | měna | směnný kurz |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | americký dolar | 1,2052 |
| JPY | japonský jen | 131,84 |
| DKK | dánská koruna | 7,4384 |
| GBP | britská libra | 0,6614 |
| SEK | švédská koruna | 9,1475 |
| CHF | švýcarský frank | 1,5126 |
| ISK | islandská koruna | 87,12 |
| NOK | norská koruna | 8,28 |
| BGN | bulharský lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | kyperská libra | 0,5828 |
| CZK | česká koruna | 31,33 |
| EEK | estonská koruna | 15,6466 |
| HUF | maďarský forint | 253,10 |
| LTL | litevský litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | lotyšský latas | 0,6536 |
| MTL | maltská lira | 0,4249 |
| PLN | polský zlotý | 4,5877 |
| ROL | rumunský lei | 40 865 |
| SIT | slovinský tolar | 239,14 |
| SKK | slovenská koruna | 39,87 |
| TRL | turecká lira | 1 806 800 |
| AUD | australský dolar | 1,7374 |
| CAD | kanadský dolar | 1,6381 |
| HKD | hongkongský dolar | 9,3975 |
| NZD | novozélandský dolar | 1,9120 |
| SGD | singapurský dolar | 2,0637 |
| KRW | jihokorejský won | 1 396,96 |
| ZAR | jihoamerický rand | 8,0189 |

měna

směnný kurz

USD

americký dolar

1,2052

JPY

japonský jen

131,84

DKK

dánská koruna

7,4384

GBP

britská libra

0,6614

SEK

švédská koruna

9,1475

CHF

švýcarský frank

1,5126

ISK

islandská koruna

87,12

NOK

norská koruna

8,28

BGN

bulharský lev

1,9558

CYP

kyperská libra

0,5828

CZK

česká koruna

31,33

EEK

estonská koruna

15,6466

HUF

maďarský forint

253,10

LTL

litevský litas

3,4528

LVL

lotyšský latas

0,6536

MTL

maltská lira

0,4249

PLN

polský zlotý

4,5877

ROL

rumunský lei

40 865

SIT

slovinský tolar

239,14

SKK

slovenská koruna

39,87

TRL

turecká lira

1 806 800

AUD

australský dolar

1,7374

CAD

kanadský dolar

1,6381

HKD

hongkongský dolar

9,3975

NZD

novozélandský dolar

1,9120

SGD

singapurský dolar

2,0637

KRW

jihokorejský won

1 396,96

ZAR

jihoamerický rand

8,0189

---

(1)

Zdroj: referenční směnné kurzy jsou publikovány ECB.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 579 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      October 10, 2002.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 5010) making 
appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2003, and for other purposes. All points of order against the 
conference report and against its consideration are waived. The conference 
report shall be considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 168 (Thursday, August 31, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 60259]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18810]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #18109; Rhode Island Disaster Number RI-00027 
Declaration of Economic Injury]

Administrative Declaration of an Economic Injury Disaster for the 
State of Rhode Island

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) 
declaration for the State of Rhode Island dated 08/25/2023.
    Incident: Block Island Hotel Fire.
    Incident Period: 08/18/2023.

DATES: Issued on 08/25/2023.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/28/2024.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's EIDL declaration, applications for economic injury 
disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other 
locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties:
    Washington
Contiguous Counties:
    Rhode Island: Kent, Newport
    Connecticut: New London

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit      4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere..      2.375
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for economic injury is 181090.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration #18109 are Rhode 
Island, Connecticut.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Isabella Guzman,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2023-18810 Filed 8-30-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
```
From: Betz, Stephan J.

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA

Subject: Comment to 45 CFR Parts 144, 146, 147, Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance

Issuers Relating to Dependent Coverage

Date: Friday, July 30, 2010 5:42:07 PM

Date: 7/30/2010

From: Stephan Betz, Assistant Director, Operations

Solano County Health and Social Services Department

Comment Regarding: Federal Register: Vol. 75, No. 92; Thursday, May 13, 2010, Interim Final

Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to

Depndent Coverage of Children to Age 26 Under the Patient Protection and

Affordable Care Act.

Comment / Issue:

If a child has aged out and has COBRA continuation coverage that could last up to 36 months

from the loss of eligibility, the child can now qualify under the parent’s plan until age 26 (page

27125). The legislative intent to allow children to be covered by their parents until age 26 is to

cover as many young adults under the age of 26 as possible with the least burden.

This rule is effective September 23, 2010 and excludes foster children who are eligible in only in

the year 2014. The rule creates a disparity between children and foster children during the

period 2010 – 2014.

In recent years approximately 60 Solano youths have been aging out of foster care in Solano

County. This includes CWS foster youth, guardianship youth and probation youth. This would

suggest that up to 300 former foster youths are in the 21 to 26 age cohort in Solano County.

The County does not have the option to insure these foster youth as their children. The

Department of Health and Human Services may estimate the number of foster children affected

by this disparity nationwide.

Possible Mitigation:

1) Amend Foster Care Independence Act

a. Step 1: Change the federal Foster Care Independence Act (PL 106-169) to give

states the option to extend Medicaid coverage for former foster youth to age 26.

b. Step 2: The California State Legislature amends Chapter 93, Statutes of 2000

implementing the option to extend coverage to foster youth up to age 26, including

a provision to let this bill sunset in 2014 when the new federal coverage

commences.

2) Change the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 to amend Title II, Subtitle A,

Section 2004 to change the effective date to September 23, 2010 and change the age

qualification to under 26 years of age.
3) Put forth a rule that Child Support Services ask birth parents of foster youth to include

their children in health insurance coverage.

NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is

intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is

addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or

exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. If you are not the intended

recipient, you are notified that dissemination, distribution, or copying of

this communication is strictly prohibited and may be a violation of law. If

you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender by

reply e-mail and delete all copies of the original message.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 540 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 25, 2002.
Whereas recent events have highlighted the need to provide American workers with 
        stronger pension protections and greater access to professional 
        investment advice;
Whereas a bipartisan majority of the House of Representatives passed H.R. 3762, 
        the Pension Security Act of 2002, on April 11, 2002, by a vote of 255 to 
        163;
Whereas the Pension Security Act of 2002 would provide working Americans with 
        more investment education and information regarding their retirement 
        plans, greater access to professional investment advice, rights to 
        diversified pension plan assets, protections against corporate abuses 
        and mismanagement of pensions, and other reforms that would increase 
        pension coverage;
Whereas the pension protections and reforms contained in the Pension Security 
        Act of 2002 would enhance the retirement security of American workers; 
        and
Whereas the Senate has not passed the Pension Security Act of 2002 or equivalent 
        legislation: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that the 
Congress should complete action in the 107th Congress on the Pension Security 
Act of 2002 and present such legislation to the President for his signature 
prior to adjournment so that needed pension protections and reforms may be 
delivered to the American people.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```