alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Coalition precision strikes kill ISIS terrorists in the Syrian Middle Euphrates River Valley

/ Published Jan. 23, 2018

Jan. 23, 2018

Release # 20180123-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**SOUTHWEST ASIA –** Combined Joint Task Force – Operation Inherent Resolve precision strikes killed an estimated 145-150 ISIS terrorists near As Shafah, Syria Jan. 20.

The precision strikes were a culmination of extensive intelligence preparation to confirm an ISIS headquarters and command and control center in an exclusively ISIS-occupied location in the contested Middle Euphrates River Valley.

Syrian Democratic Forces on the ground, who continue to be engaged in heavy fighting against hard-core ISIS remnants attempting to regroup, assisted in target observation prior to the strikes. The combination of intelligence and continuous eyes on the target ensured no accidental engagement of non-military personnel.

The ISIS headquarters contained a heavy concentration of ISIS fighters who appear to have been massing for movement. “The strikes underscore our assertion that the fight to liberate Syria is far from over,” said Maj. Gen. James Jarrard, commanding general of Special Operations Joint Task Force – Operation Inherent Resolve.

“Our SDF partners are still making daily progress and sacrifices, and together we are still finding, targeting and killing ISIS terrorists intent on keeping their extremist hold on the region. We cannot take our focus off our mission, and we must not lose our momentum in taking these terrorists off the battlefield and preventing them from resurfacing somewhere else,” said Jarrard.

Though ISIS has lost more than 98% of the land it once claimed as part of its so-called physical caliphate, the group continues to demonstrate the ability to mass large numbers in its attempt to retain a stronghold in Syria.

The continued discovery of ISIS concentrations and facilities reinforces the Coalition’s commitment to achieving the lasting defeat of ISIS.

- 30 -
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Application of China Eastern Airlines Corporation Limited for Renewal of Exemption Authority.
U.S., Bahrain Launch Annual Maritime Security Exercise
 
  By U.S. Naval Forces Central Command Public Affairs
  Military personnel from the United States and the Kingdom of Bahrain began a 10-day naval exercise Jan. 15 in and off the coast of Bahrain. Exercise Neon Defender is an annual bilateral training event that enhances collaboration and interoperability among the Bahrain Defence Force, Ministry of Interior and U.S. Naval Forces Central Command (NAVCENT). NAVCENT is headquartered in Manama, Bahrain. “We are very excited to begin the new year training side by side with the Kingdom of Bahrain, a longstanding, strategic partner,” said Vice Adm. Brad Cooper, commander of NAVCENT and U.S. 5th Fleet. Cooper also leads the Combined Maritime Forces and the International Maritime Security Construct, two U.S.-led international naval coalitions hosted in Bahrain. “Each year, our mutual commitment to regional maritime security and stability strengthens and expands, and this year is no different,” said Cooper. “This is a great start to meaningful bilateral cooperation we will demonstrate together in 2023.” The exercise will focus on maritime operations, installation defense, expeditionary operations, tactical combat, medical response and search and rescue training. Approximately 200 personnel from the U.S. Navy, Marine Corps and Coast Guard are participating in addition to coastal patrol ships USS Monsoon (PC 4) and USS Chinook (PC 9). “We appreciate the opportunity to sharpen our skills alongside our Bahraini partners,” said Lt. Cmdr. Antoni Wyszynski, the lead exercise planner. “This event brings us together and enables us to learn from each another.” NAVCENT includes maritime forces stationed in Bahrain and operating in the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, Red Sea, parts of the Indian Ocean and three critical choke points at the Strait of Hormuz, Suez Canal and Bab al-Mandeb.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

Received: January 01, 2016

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1k0-8n4z-k8m6

Comments Due: January 19, 2016

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2015-0017

Claims Procedure for Plans Providing Disability Benefits

Comment On: EBSA-2015-0017-0001

Claims Procedure for Plans Providing Disability Benefits

Document: EBSA-2015-0017-DRAFT-0011

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-29295

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

These proposed changes seem to improve the procedure and remove a couple of loopholes which 

companies have been known to exploit. Far more just. They also seem beneficial in improving 

the understanding of the process for claimants and thus reducing time wasted for the companies. 

I am in favor of this.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Francis McGinley v. Board of Fire Commissioners, Respondents.

Proceedings affirmed.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Senesco Technologies, Inc. for the period ended December 31,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
the undersigned, Jack Van Hulst, President and Chief Executive Officer, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:




(1)           The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Senesco
Technologies, Inc.




Dated:
      February 16, 2010
              /s/ Jack Van Hulst *Jack
      Van HulstPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer(principal
      executive officer)




*  A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.53


                               FIFTH AMENDMENT TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


       THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the
"Fifth Amendment") is made and entered into as of May 11, 1998, by and between
Group 1 Software, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Company") and Robert S. Bowen,
a Maryland resident ("Employee").

       WHEREAS, Company and Employee entered into that certain Amended Restated
Employment Agreement dated as of January 28, 1992, as amended by the First,
Second, Third, and Fourth Amendments, of various dates (collectively the
"Agreement"), regarding various terms and conditions of employment of Employee
with respect to Company; and

       WHEREAS, Company and Employee wish to amend the Agreement, but only with
respect to the terms set out herein; and

       WHEREAS, Company and Employee are mutually desirous that such
satisfactory employment relationship should continue under the terms and
conditions of the Agreement, as amended.

       NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises contained herein, and
other good and valuable consideration (including the issuance to Employee of an
option to purchase 15,000 shares of COMNET common stock), the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Company and Employee intending to
be legally bound hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

       1. Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby modified so that the term of the
Agreement shall extend through March 31, 2001.

       2. Group 1 and Employee hereby affirm that the Agreement, as amended
hereby, remains in full force and effect, and is not further modified hereby.

<PAGE>   2


       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Fifth
Amendment as of the date written above.

                                    Group 1 Software, Inc.



                                    By:  [SIG]    
                                       ------------------------

                                    Its: Chief Financial Officer
                                         ----------------------

                                        /s/ROBERT S. BOWEN
                                    ----------------------------
                                    Robert S. Bowen, Individually
Exhibit
23




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM






We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-50447 and 333-128174 on Form S-3 of our reports dated February 28, 2008,
relating to the financial statements (and with respect to the report on those
financial statements, expressed an unqualified opinion and included an
explanatory paragraph concerning the adoption of new accounting pronouncements
in 2006 and 2007) and financial statement schedule of Columbus Southern Power
Company and subsidiaries appearing in and incorporated by reference in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Columbus Southern Power Company and subsidiaries
for the year ended December 31, 2007.









/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP




Columbus,
Ohio


February
28, 2008
# April 23: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL in Syria and Iraq

/ Published April 23, 2015

April 23, 2015

Release # 20150423FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**SOUTHWEST ASIA –** Coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq between 8 a.m., April 22, and 8 a.m., April 23, local time.  In Syria, Coalition military forces conducted five airstrikes using attack, fighter and bomber aircraft.  Separately in Iraq, Coalition military forces conducted 16 airstrikes approved by the Iraqi Ministry of Defense using fighter, attack and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL terrorists.

“The Coalition struck Daesh forces in nine different locations across Iraq and Syria,” said Col. Wayne Marotto, CJTF-OIR Chief of Public Affairs. “We are working very closely with our partners to find and strike Daesh with precision fires.”

The following is a summary of the strikes conducted since the last press release:

**Syria**

         Near Al Hasakah, an airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit, destroying three ISIL fighting positions.

         Near Kobani, four airstrikes struck four ISIL tactical units, destroying two ISIL fighting positions.

**Iraq**

         Near Al Asad, an airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit, destroying an ISIL command and control facility.

         Near Al Qaim, an airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit, destroying an ISIL vehicle.          

         Near Bayji, three airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and two ISIL Stryker vehicles, destroying an ISIL vehicle and an ISIL armored vehicle.

         Near Fallujah, five airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit, destroying an ISIL building.

         Near Mosul, three airstrikes struck an ISIL security headquarters, destroying an ISIL excavator.  

         Near Ramadi, two airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit, destroying an ISIL sniper position, an ISIL house-borne IED and an ISIL vehicle.

         Near Sinjar, an airstrike destroyed three ISIL buildings and three ISIL fighting positions.

Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely.

The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria, the region, and the wider international community. The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Iraq include Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Syria include Bahrain, Canada, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and U.S.
Editorial Note on Part 398
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 398 appear at 66 FR 49875, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 398.1 Definitions. ( a ) *Migrant worker.* “Migrant worker” means any individual proceeding to or returning from employment in agriculture as defined in section 3(f) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended (29 U.S.C. 203(f)) or section 3121(g) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (26 U.S.C. 3121(g)).
( b ) *Carrier of migrant workers by motor vehicle.* “Carrier of migrant worker by motor vehicle” means any person, including any for-hire, non-exempt motor carrier conducting contract carriage operations as defined in 49 U.S.C. 13102(4)(B), but not including any for-hire, non-exempt motor carrier subject to other requirements in 49 U.S.C. subtitle IV, part B besides contract carriage operations, who or which transports in interstate or foreign commerce at any one time three or more migrant workers to or from their employment by any motor vehicle other than a passenger automobile or station wagon, except a migrant worker transporting himself/herself or his/her immediate family.
( c ) *Motor carrier.* “Motor carrier” means any carrier of migrant workers by motor vehicle as defined in paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) *Motor vehicle.* “Motor vehicle” means any vehicle, machine, tractor, trailer, or semitrailer propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used upon the highways in the transportation of passengers or property, or any combination thereof, determined by the Administration, but does not include a passenger automobile or station wagon, any vehicle, locomotive, or car operated exclusively on a rail or rails, or a trolley bus operated by electric power derived from a fixed overhead wire, furnishing local passenger transportation in street-railway service.
( e ) *Bus.* “Bus” means any motor vehicle designed, constructed, and used for the transportation of passengers: Except passenger automobiles or station wagons other than taxicabs.
( f ) *Truck.* “Truck” means any self-propelled motor vehicle except a truck tractor, designed and constructed primarily for the transportation of property.
( g ) *Truck tractor.* “Truck tractor” means a self-propelled motor vehicle designed and used primarily for drawing other vehicles and not so constructed as to carry a load other than a part of the weight of the vehicle and load so drawn.
( h ) *Semitrailer.* “Semitrailer” means any motor vehicle other than a “pole trailer”, with or without motive power designed to be drawn by another motor vehicle and so constructed that some part of its weight rests upon the towing vehicle.
( i ) *Driver or operator.* “Driver or operator” means any person who drives any motor vehicle.
( j ) *Highway.* “Highway” means the entire width between the boundary lines of every way publicly maintained when any part thereof is open to the use of the public for purposes of vehicular traffic.
[33 FR 19765, Dec. 25, 1968, as amended at 81 FR 68359, Oct. 4, 2016]
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

Received: December 04, 2017

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1k1-905r-9196

Comments Due: December 11, 2017

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2015-0017

Claims Procedure for Plans Providing Disability Benefits; Extension of Applicability

Date

Comment On: EBSA-2015-0017-0291

Claims Procedure: Plans Providing Disability Benefits

Document: EBSA-2015-0017-DRAFT-0409

Comment on FR Doc # 2017-22082

Submitter Information

Name: Kirk Wolgemuth

Address: 232 East Orange Street

Lancaster, PA, 17602

Email: kwolgemuth@palawyers1.com

Phone: 7173920389

General Comment

Office of Regulations and Interpretations

EBSA U.S. Dept. of Labor

Re Re-Examination of Claims Procedure Reglations

RIN No. 1210-AB39

Dear Deputy Assistant Hauser:

I am writing to urge the Department of Labor from delaying the revised regulations 

included in 29 C.F.R. Section 2560.503. My practice is limited to representing 

plaintiff's in ERISA claims. Insurance companies are supposed to be fiduciaries under 

ERISA but in practice they are everything but fiduciaries. I question the insurance 

companies claims that the costs will increase with the proposed changes to the 

regulations. Even if costs do rise, the protection given by the revised regulations are 
needed to provide a more fair claims procedure. For example, the proposed regulation 

requiring a disability carrier to explain the basis for disagreement with the Social 

Security decision will not add any cost to the claim's review. Similarly, the change to 

the deemed exhausted rule will not add any cost to the insurance company. Finally, 

providing the ability to respond to the insurance companies medical evidence will not 

increase the costs to the insurance company. Instead, it will decrease the costs because 

the insurance company will have better evidence to make the proper decision. Kirk L. 

Wolgemuth, Wolgemuth & Levinson, 232 East Orange Street, Lancaster, PA 17602
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     Financial Data Schedule for INVU, Inc.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001035039
<NAME>                        INVU, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JUL-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                          0
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   10,444
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     123,533
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                169,137
<PP&E>                          132,115
<DEPRECIATION>                  56,684
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  244,568
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           914,437
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        288,355
<OTHER-SE>                      (1,461,443)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    244,568
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                19,813
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   562,801
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              (27,317)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (570,305)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (570,305)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.02)



</TABLE>
#### John Edwards, Appellant, v. The City of Watertown, Respondent.

Order appealed from modified by addition of the words, viz.: “ TU® substitution of Richard B. Sparks as a ooplaintiff, is subject to lien of Anson B. Moore who-is to be continued as the plaintiff’s attorney until his lien is paid”; and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Opinions by Hardin, P. J., and Follett, J.
**EXHIBIT 23.2****INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**The Board of DirectorsCT Communications, Inc.:     We consent to incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements (Registration Nos. 33-59641, 33-59645, 333-15537,333-38895, 333-65818, 333-119873 and 333-65846) of CTCommunications, Inc. of our report dated February 19, 2004,relating to the audited consolidated balance sheets of PalmettoMobileNet, L.P. as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and therelated consolidated statements of income and partners’equity, and cash flows for each of the three years endedDecember 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, which report is includedin the December 31, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K/ A(Amendment No. 1) of CT Communications, Inc.     /s/ Bauknight Pietras & Stormer, P.A.Columbia, South CarolinaApril 28, 2005
Independent Auditors' Report


The Board of Directors and Shareholders
QVC, Inc.:

We have audited the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive
income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1998
of QVC, Inc. and subsidiaries. These consolidated financial statements, which
are not separately presented herein, are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of
QVC, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1998, in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 3, 1999
# Europos Sąjungos C 152/2004

| | ISSN 1725-521X |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 152 |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir prane_imai | 47 tomas2004m. birželio 9d. |

ISSN 1725-521X

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 152

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir prane_imai

47 tomas2004m. birželio 9d.

---

| Prane_imo Nr. | Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Informacija |
| | Komisija |
| 2004/C 152/1 | Euro kursas | 1 |

Prane_imo Nr.

Turinys

Puslapis

I   Informacija

Komisija

2004/C 152/1

Euro kursas

1

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

I Informacija

Komisija

| 9.6.2004 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | C 152/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2004

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

C 152/1

---

Euro kursas (1)

2004 m. birželio 8 d.

(2004/C 152/01)

1 euras=

| | Valiuta | Valiutos kursas |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | JAV doleris | 1,2294 |
| JPY | Japonijos jena | 135,08 |
| DKK | Danijos krona | 7,4349 |
| GBP | Svaras šterlingas | 0,66840 |
| SEK | Švedijos krona | 9,1040 |
| CHF | Šveicarijos frankas | 1,5229 |
| ISK | Islandijos krona | 87,36 |
| NOK | Norvegijos krona | 8,1885 |
| BGN | Bulgarijos levas | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Kipro svaras | 0,58300 |
| CZK | Čekijos krona | 31,243 |
| EEK | Estijos kronos | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Vengrijos forintas | 251,15 |
| LTL | Lietuvos litas | 3,4527 |
| LVL | Latvijos latas | 0,6623 |
| MTL | Maltos lira | 0,4263 |
| PLN | Lenkijos zlotas | 4,5957 |
| ROL | Rumunijos lėja | 40 758 |
| SIT | Slovėnijos tolaras | 239,1500 |
| SKK | Slovakijos krona | 39,870 |
| TRL | Turkijos lira | 1 811 841 |
| AUD | Australijos doleris | 1,7507 |
| CAD | Kanados doleris | 1,6520 |
| HKD | Honkongo doleris | 9,5838 |
| NZD | Naujosios Zelandijos doleris | 1,9568 |
| SGD | Singapūro doleris | 2,0990 |
| KRW | Pietų Korėjos vonas | 1 423,46 |
| ZAR | Pietų Afrikos randas | 8,0262 |

Valiuta

Valiutos kursas

USD

JAV doleris

1,2294

JPY

Japonijos jena

135,08

DKK

Danijos krona

7,4349

GBP

Svaras šterlingas

0,66840

SEK

Švedijos krona

9,1040

CHF

Šveicarijos frankas

1,5229

ISK

Islandijos krona

87,36

NOK

Norvegijos krona

8,1885

BGN

Bulgarijos levas

1,9558

CYP

Kipro svaras

0,58300

CZK

Čekijos krona

31,243

EEK

Estijos kronos

15,6466

HUF

Vengrijos forintas

251,15

LTL

Lietuvos litas

3,4527

LVL

Latvijos latas

0,6623

MTL

Maltos lira

0,4263

PLN

Lenkijos zlotas

4,5957

ROL

Rumunijos lėja

40 758

SIT

Slovėnijos tolaras

239,1500

SKK

Slovakijos krona

39,870

TRL

Turkijos lira

1 811 841

AUD

Australijos doleris

1,7507

CAD

Kanados doleris

1,6520

HKD

Honkongo doleris

9,5838

NZD

Naujosios Zelandijos doleris

1,9568

SGD

Singapūro doleris

2,0990

KRW

Pietų Korėjos vonas

1 423,46

ZAR

Pietų Afrikos randas

8,0262

---

(1)

Šaltinis: valiutų perskaičiavimo kursai paskelbti ECB.

---