### ATTACHMENT 4

STAFF REPORT

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO RULE 74.2, ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS

Ventura County Air Pollu tion Control District

669 County Square Drive Ventura, California 93003

November 10, 2009

### Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 2

CONTENTS
Section Page Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 3 Background ................................................................................................................... 4

Intro ducti on ................................................................................................................. .. 4 Emission Inventory ............................................................................................................ .... 5 Proposed Rule Requirements ................................................................................................................... 5 Comparison of Propos ed Rule Requirements with Other Air Pollution Control Requirements .............. 7 Comparison with National Rule............................................................................................. 8 Comparison with BACT (SCAQMD Rule 1113) .................................................................. 8 Comparison with Air Pollution Control Requirem ent Elements............................................ 9 Impact of the Proposed Rule Revisions .......................................................................................................... 9
ROC Emissi on Impacts.......................................................................................................... 9 Socioeconomic Impacts Analysis .......................................................................................... 9 Types of Affected Business and In dustry Including Small Business................................... 10 Economic Impacts.............................................................................................................. .. 10 Range of Prob able Costs...................................................................................................... 1 1
Costs to Consumers............................................................................................................ .. 12
Costs to Sm all Busi ness ....................................................................................................... 14
Emission Reduction Pote ntial of the Rule............................................................................ 14
Cost-Effec tiveness ............................................................................................................ ... 14
Incremental Cost-Eff ectiveness An alysis............................................................................. 15 Environmental Impacts of Methods of Compliance/CEQA ........................................................................ 15
Other Factors ................................................................................................................. 16 Technological Feas ibility

..................................................................................................... 16
Enfor ceability

............................................................................................................... .. 16
Public A cceptab ility

.......................................................................................................... ... 16 Environmental Comp liance and Review.............................................................................. 17 Future Technology Assessments.......................................................................................... 17

References ................................................................................................................. 17 Compliant Products List .................................................................................................. Appendix I

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1 Propose d ROC Limits .................................................................................................... ....... 6 Table 2 Comparison of Proposal with South AQMD Rule 1113 ROC Li mits .................................. 8 Table 3 Manufacturers Responding to Economic Im pact Survey.................................................... 11 Table 4 Estimates of Projected Ma ximum Coating Prices Increases ............................................... 13
Table 5 Cost-E ffectiveness ..................................................................................................... ......... 15
Table 6 Calculation of Incremental Cost-Eff ectiveness for SCAQMD ROC Limits Option........... 15 Table 7 Environmental Impacts and Mitig ations of Methods of Compliance.................................. 16

DISCLAIMER

This report contains references to company and product names to illustrate product availability. Mention of these names is not to be considered an endorsement by the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District.

### Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Staff is proposing to adopt amendments to Rule 74.2, Architectural Coatings, to reduce the reactive organic compound (ROC) emissions from the coating of structures and their appurtenances. This rule development is based on the Suggested Control Measure (SCM) adopted by the California Air Resources Board (ARB) on October 26, 2007. The
SCM was based on ARB’s evaluation of the feasibility of South Coast AQMD Rule 1113 ROC limits for other air districts without having to rely on SCAQMD’s coating emissions averaging provisions.

Ventura County is designated as a serious
nonattainment area for the federal ozone standard and
as a severe nonattainment area for the state ozone standard. The California Clean Air Act requires areas designated as severe nonattainment for ozone to adopt control measures requ ired in Sections 40913, 40914, and 40919 of the California Health and Safety Code (H & SC):

3⁄4 Section 40913 requires districts to develop a plan to achieve California’s ambient air quality standard by the earliest practicable date. Control Measure R-329 in the District’s 2007 Air Quality Management Plan references the architectural coatings rule. Rule 74.2 is being amended to implement this measure. 3⁄4 Section 40914 requires each district plan to demonstrate that the plan includes “every feasible measure.” Districts must adopt the most
effective and feasible co ntrol measures to reduce ROC emissions from architectural coatings. The October 26, 2007, adoption of the 2007 SCM included Resolution 07-46, which contained a Finding of the proposed SCM as “feasible,” and that it should be adopted by districts that need
additional emission reductions for the attainment of state or federal ambient air quality standards. Amendments to Rule 74.2 are being proposed to meet this requirement. 3⁄4 Section 40919 requires districts classified as
serious or severe nonattainment for ozone to adopt Best Available Retrofit Control Technology (BARCT) for all existing sources.
BARCT means an emission limitation that is based on the maximum degree of reduction achievable, taking into account environmental, energy, and economic impacts by each class or category of sources (H & SC Section 40406). Staff has found that the SCM requirements meet the BARCT requirement based on the CARB staff report that contains analyses of emission control, environmental impacts, energy impacts, and economic impacts. Therefore the proposed rule meets the requiremen ts of H & SC Section

40919.

Staff is proposing to reduce ROC emissions from architectural coating operatio ns in Ventura County by reducing the ROC content of the following coating categories: Flat Coatings; Nonflat Coatings; Aluminum Roof Coatings; Bituminous Roof Coatings, Concrete/Masonry Sealers, Dry Fog Coatings, Floor Coatings; Mastic Texture Coatings, Primers, Sealers and Undercoaters; Reactive Penetrating Sealers; Roof Coatings; Rust Preventative Coatings; Traffic Marking Coatings; Wood Coatings; and Zinc-Rich Primers.

Proposed amendments to Rule 74.2 will affect many architectural coatings used on new structures and their appurtenances and used to maintain existing structures and appurtenan ces. This rule impacts field-applied architectural coatings rather than those applied in a spray booth.

According to the ARB archit ectural coating survey of 2004, the California inventory of ROC emissions
from architectural coatin gs (excluding cleanup solvents) is approximately 95 tons per day. This translates to about 2.1 tons of ROC per day emissions in Ventura County based on a population factor. The estimated emission reduction from this proposed revision is about 24 percent or 0.5 tons of ROC per day. Although ARB staff estimated a 28 percent emission reduction in the 2007 SCM Staff Report, a
more conservative estimate has been made to compensate for lost emission reductions if the rule is not 100 percent effective.

ARB staff estimated the co st-effectiveness of the SCM by dividing the total annual cost to reformulate all noncomplying products in a given coating category by the total annual emissions for thatcategory. Based on their analyses, the costeffectiveness for the individual ROC categories ranges from essentially no cost to $13.90 per pound of ROC reduced. The average cost-effectiveness was weighted by emission reductions across all the categories ROC limits pro posed for change and was approximately $1.12 per pound of ROC reduced. This cost-effectiveness value assumes that average resin costs for reformulation will increase by 20
percent.

### Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 4

Ventura County APCD staff also estimated the costeffectiveness of proposed amendments to Rule 74.2. The estimate of $1.38 per pound of ROC reduced is based on the cost to coating manufacturers for reformulating coatings apportioned by the population of the county. There are currently no architectural coating manufacturers in the county.

ARB staff also performed a cost analysis to determine the potential price increases of reformulated coatings for consumers. A worst-case analysis assumes that all the costs of the SCM are passed along to the consumers, which is highly unlikely because compliant competitive coatings are already available. This analysis showed a range of no price increase for the flat coatings to a cost increase of $27.30 per gallon for floor coatings. Because the complying share of floor coatings is 85 percent, many manufacturers have already reformulated their coatings to meet the proposed ROC limit. Therefore, ARB staff determined that it was appropriate for the remaining manufacturers to meet the proposed limit . Overall, ARB staff estimated the average cost increase per unit at about $1.21 per gallon if all costs were passed on to the consumer. Currently, the average cost per gallon for consumers is about $19.20. Thus the maximum increase is approximately six percent.

This report contains five additional sections: (1) Background, (2) Proposed Rule Requirements, (3) Comparison of Proposed Rule Requirements with Other Air Pollution Control Requirements, (4) Impact of the Proposed Rule, and (5) Environmental Impacts and Methods of Compliance. The first section provides background information including regulatory history, latest air pollution control technology and source description. The second section explains the key features of proposed
amendments to Rule 74.2. The third section compares the proposed requirements with existing federal requirements and Best Available Control Technology (BACT). The fourth section is an analysis of the effect of the proposed rule on ROC emissions and socioeconomic impacts. The last section examines the environmental impacts of compliance methods and the mitigation of those impacts.

BACKGROUND

Introduction

Architectural Coatings are defined as any coating applied to a stationary structure and their appurtenances, to mobile homes, to portable buildings, to pavements, or to curbs. Architectural coatings are formulated with a variety of components including pigments, resins, solvents, and different additives such as driers, an ti-skinning agents, anti-sag agents, dispersing agents, defoaming agents, preservatives and fungicides. The primary source of
air emissions from archit ectural coatings is the solvent component in solvent-based coatings and the co-solvents from waterborne coatings.

Currently, architectural coa tings in Ventura County are regulated by Rule 74.2, which was first adopted on June 19, 1979, and was based on the ARB’s 1977 Model Rule. ARB and the air districts subsequently revised this model rule in 1985, 1989, and 2000. The 2000 SCM was the basis for the last major revisions
to this rule.

CARB, in cooperation with the local air pollution control agencies and the architectural coatings industry, revised the Suggested Control Measure (SCM) for architectural coa tings in 2007. The need to revisit the SCM has arisen because of: (i) advances in coatings technology over the past seven years, and(ii) the need for emission reductions to attain healthbased air quality standards in many districts. CARB, in cooperation with the local air districts, has developed a new SCM that acts as a model rule for districts when adopting and amending their local architectural coating rules.

Staff has reviewed CARB’s wo rk and participated on
the California Air Resources Board’s Architectural Coatings Working Group during the development of the SCM. As part of the SCM development process, CARB prepared a Staff Report including an economic analysis and analyzing the SCM for environmental impacts. For the sake of statewide uniformity and the need for additional emission reductions, the District is proposing to adopt the SCM adopted by ARB on October 26, 2007.

EPA promulgated the National Volatile Organic Compound Emission Standards for Architectural Coatings (National Architectural Coatings Rule) in 1998. The 2007 SCM is more stringent than the national rule for all coating categories.

### Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 5

Emission Inventory

The quantity of ROC emissions from the use of architectural coatings is best determined using the ARB’s survey of coatings sold in the state. According to their most recent survey in 2005 (architectural coatings sold in 2004), approximately 95 tons of ROC per day were emitted from the use of architectural coatings in California. Using a population factor of about 2.2% for a Ventura County relative to the population of California, the estimated emission inventory for this source category is about 2.1 tons of ROC per day.

PROPOSED RULE REQUIREMENTS

This section summarizes the major proposed requirements of proposed amendments to Rule 74.2. The proposed new ROC limits are listed in Table 1. All of the proposed coa ting categories were thoroughly researched by ARB staff in the SCM staff report to determine the technical feasibility of the proposed limits. One measure was the percentage of coatings that are available today that comply with the proposed future limits. The complying market share for each new coating ROC limit ranged from 3 percent for Rust Preventative coatings to 100 percent for Driveway Sealers. In all cases, products are available today that comply with proposed new limits. The major changes are listed below:

1. Lowered the ROC limit for nineteen coatingcategories including: Nonflats; NonflatsHigh Gloss; Aluminum Roof; Bituminous Roof; Concrete Sealers; Driveway Sealers; Dry Fog; Floor; Mastic Texture; Roof, Rust Preventative, Specialty Primers, Sealers and Undercoaters; Traffic Marking; Waterproofing Membranes; Wood; and Zinc-Rich Primers. The limits will go into effect January 1, 2011 except for Flats, Rust Preventative, Prim er, Sealers and Undercoaters, and Specialty Primers, Sealers and Undercoaters which will go into effect on January 1, 2012.

2. Deleted fifteen coating categories including: Antenna; Anti-fouling; Clear Brushing Lacquer; Lacquers; Sanding Sealers; Varnishes; Clear Fire Retardant; Opaque Fire Retardant; Flow; Quick-Dry Enamel; Quick-Dry Primer Sealer Undercoater; Swimming Pool Repair; Temperature Indicator; Waterproofing Sealers; and Water Proofing Concrete/Masonry Sealers.

3. Added ten new coating categories including: Aluminum Roof, Basement Specialty; Concrete/Masonry Sealer; Driveway Sealer; Reactive Penetrating Sealer; Stone Consolidants; Tub & Tile Refinish; Waterproofing Membrane; Wood Coatings;
and Zinc-Rich Primers.

4. Averaging Provision did sunset in 2005 and
was not included in 2007 SCM.

In order to more easily un derstand the applicability of these new coating categories, ARB staff has
summarized the transitions as follows:

Aluminum Roof Coating : This is a new category that was formerly covered by Metallic Pigmented.

Basement Specialty Coating : This new category was formerly covered by Waterproofing Sealer and Waterproofing Concrete/Masonry Sealer.

Concrete/Masonry Sealer : This new category was formerly covered by Waterproofing Sealer, Waterproofing Concrete/Masonry Sealer, and other categories.

Driveway Sealer : This proposed new category was formerly covered by the default ROC limits (Flat, Nonflat, or Nonflat- high gloss).

Fire Retardant Coatings : This coating category will be eliminated and these coatings will be subject
to the default ROC limits.

### Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 6

Table 1. Proposed ROC Limits

COATING CATEGORY CURRENT

LIMIT 1,2 EFFECTIVE 1/1/2011 EFFECTIVE 1/1/2012

Flat Coatings 100 50
Nonflat Coatings 150 100
Nonflat–High Gloss 250 150

SPECIALTY COATINGS Aluminum Roof Coatings 400
Basement Specialty Coatings 400

Bituminous Roof 300 50

Bituminous Roof Primer 350

Bond Breaker 350
Concrete Curing
Compounds 350

Concrete/Masonry

Sealers 350 100

Driveway Sealers 100 50
Dry Fog Coatings 400 150
Faux Finishing Coatings 350
Fire Resistive Coatings 350
Floor Coatings 250 100
Form-Release Compounds 250
Graphic Arts-Sign

Paints 500

High Temperature Coatings 420

Industrial Maintenance 250
Low Solids Coatings 3 120
Magnesite Cement Coatings 450

Mastic Texture Coatings 300 100
Metallic Pigmented Coatings 500

Multi-Color Coatings 250

Pretreatment Wash

Primers 420

Primers, Sealer &

Undercoaters 200 100

Reactive Penetrating

Sealers 350 4

1 The specified limits remain in effect unless revised limits are listed in subsequent columns in the table.

2 Conversion factor: one pound ROC per gallon (U.S.) = 119.95 grams ROC per liter.

3 Units for low-solid coatings are grams of ROC per liter (pounds of ROC per gallon) of coating, including water and exempt compounds.

4 The ROC limits for Tub & Tile Refinish, Stone Consolidants, and Reactive Penetrating Sealers will become effective on date of rule adoption.

### Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 7

Table 1 (continued) Proposed ROC Limits

COATING CATEGORY CURRENT

LIMIT LIMIT

EFFECTIVE 1/1/2011 LIMIT

EFFECTIVE 1/1/2012
Recycled Coatings 250
Roof Coatings 250 50

Rust Preventative 400 250

Shellacs – Clear 730
Shellacs – Opaque 550
Specialty Primers,
Sealers, & Undercoaters 350 100

Stains 350 250

Stone Consolidants 450 4

Swimming Pool Coatings 340
Traffic Marking Coatings 150 100

Tub & Tile Refinish 420 4

Waterproofing Membranes 250
Wood Coatings 275

Wood Preservatives 350

Zinc-Rich Primers 500 340

Reactive Penetrating Sealer : This new category was formerly covered by Waterproofing Sealer and Waterproofing Concrete/Masonry Sealer, and the
new ROC limit will become effective on date of rule adoption.

Stone Consolidant : This new category was formerly covered by Waterproofing Concrete/Masonry Sealer,
and the new ROC limit will become effective on date of rule adoption.

Tub and Tile Refinish : This new category wasformerly covered by the default ROC limits (NonflatHigh Gloss) and the new ROC limit will become effective on date of rule adoption.

Waterproofing Membrane : This new category was formerly covered by Waterproofing Sealer and Waterproofing Concrete/Masonry Sealer. Wood Coatings : This new category contains all the former categories listed un der Clear Wood including Clear Brushing Lacquer, Lacquer, Sanding Sealer, and Varnishes. It also contains those Waterproofing Sealers applied to wood substrates.

Zinc-Rich Primers : This new category was formerly covered by Metallic Pigmented coatings.

It is useful to know that the one-liter (1.057 quart) or smaller containers are still exempt from rule requirements. Also, another three-year sell through provision is allowed for all noncomplying coatings for proposed new ROC limits. This sell-through provision is designed to allow the coatings to be sold up to 3 years after the effective date if it was in compliance at the time of ma nufacture. This should minimize the need to ship th ese coatings back to the
manufacturer or create additional hazardous waste.

COMPARISON OF PROPOSED RULE REQUIREMENTS WITH OTHER AIR POLLUTION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS

H & SC Section 40727.2 requires districts to compare the requirements of a proposed revised rule with other air pollution control requirements. These other air pollution control requirements include federal regulations, Best Available Control Technology (BACT), and any other District rule applying to the same equipment or process. Proposed amendments to Rule 74.2 is more stringent than those in the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s
national rule and are based on the ARB’s 2007 SCM.

### Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 8

Even considering the averaging provision, SCAQMD Rule 1113 may be considered to be BACT and is more stringent than proposed amendments to Rule 74.2. No other District rules have air pollution control requirements that would conflict with Rule 74.2 requirements.

Comparison with National Rule

There are many differences between proposed
amendments to Rule 74.2 and the national architectural coatings ru le, which became effective on September 13, 1999. The national rule only applies to manufacturers and importers of architectural coatings while Rule 74.2 applies to manufacturers, distributors, retailers, and users of architectural coatings. The national rule also has generally higher (less restrictive) ROC limits than Rule 74.2. For example, the proposed ROC limits in the national rule for the three largest categories (flats, non-flats, and industrial maintenance coatings) are 250, 380, and 450 grams per liter, respectively. This compares with the ROC limits of 50, 100 (excluding high-gloss non-flats), and 250 grams per liter, respectively, for the same categories in proposed
amendments to Rule 74.2. The national rule also includes 30 additional specialty categories not included in proposed amendments to Rule 74.2. The “national” categories are covered under one of the existing coating categories in Rule 74.2. ARB staff analyzed these additional national categories and found it was not necessary to add most of them to the SCM because: there are complying products that may be regulated under other coating categories in existing district rules; th ey are not architectural coatings; or they are not sold in California. Staff has also analyzed the additional coating categories in the
national rule and concluded that for all but two of the categories (Calcime Recoat er Coating and Concrete Surface Retarder), they are not needed because they would be subject to another coating category in the proposed rule or to another district coating rule. Staff
has also determined that the Calcimine Recoater Coating is unique to the New England area and the Concrete Surface Retarder is not a coating and, therefore, these categories are not necessary for the proposed rule.

Comparison with BACT (SCAQMD Rule 1113)

SCAQMD Rule 1113 ROC Limits would be Best Available Control Technology (BACT) because it would be the most effective emission control device, emission limit, or technique that has been required or used for this type of equipment. These limits would not be BACT if such limitations have not been demonstrated to be achievable in practice.



### Table 2. Comparison of Proposal with SCAQMD Rule 1113 ROC Limits

Coating Category ROC Limit –
Rule 74.2 (proposed) ROC Limit – SCAQMD (Adopted) Al Roof Coating 400 100 Concrete Curing 5 350 100 Floor Coating 100 50

Indus. Maintenance 250 100

Nonflats 100 50

Nonflat –Hi Gloss 150 50

Rust Preventative 250 100

Stains 250 100 Waterproof Sealers 275 (wood) 100

Zinc-Rich Primers 340 100

For the 10 coating categories listed in Table 2, the proposed ROC limits for Rule 74.2 are less stringent than the adopted limits in South Coast AQMD’s Rule 1113. An important caveat is that the South Coast rule contains an averaging provision that allows industry to more easily comply with the more stringent limits in Table 2 . The SCAQMD’s averaging provisions allow manufacturers to average the ROC content of their coatings that over-comply with the proposed limits with other coatings that do not comply as long as the overall emission reductions are equivalent or lower. Ventura County is not proposing to renew an existing averaging provision
because the Environmenta l Protection Agency has identified an this provision as a deficiency in the State Implementation Plan because of enforceability issues (FR Sept 20, 2002, Vol. 67, Number 183). Moreover, ARB staff established limits in the 2007 SCM that could be met without the need for industry to develop averaging programs. Another drawback of the averaging provision is that this regulatory scenario may tend to favor larger paint manufacturers with large product portfolios that can facilitate averaging schemes.

Another important difference between proposed amendments to Rule 74.2 and SCAQMD Rule 1113 is that wood coatings in Rule 1113 are not eligible for the one quart small container exemption. Proposed Rule 74.2 retains the one quart small container exemption for all coating categ ories. The most recent

5 The 100 grams per liter ROC limit does not apply to roadways or bridges.

### Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 9

ARB survey reported that only three percent of the
sales volume was derived from small containers (quarts or less). Comparison of Air Pollution Control Requirement Elements

Health and Safety Code Section 40727.2.(c) requires
the district review the fo llowing elements in the comparative analysis between proposed amendments
to Rule 74.2 and federal and BACT rules:

• Averaging provisions, units and any other pertinent provisions associated with
emission limits.

• Operating parameters and work practice requirements.

• Monitoring, reporting and recordkeeping requirements, including test methods, format, content and frequency.

• Any other element the district determines
warrants review. The averaging provisions in Rule 74.2 sunset in 2005, and no new averaging provisions are being proposed. The coating (emission) limits in proposed
amendments to Rule 74.2 ar e stated as grams of ROC per liter of coating less water and less exempt organic compounds. These units are identical to the units in both the national rule and SCAQMD Rule 1113.

There are no air pollution control requirements involving operating parameters in any of the rules subject to this analysis. Proposed amendments to
Rule 74.2 includ e a work practice requirement that calls for closing coating and solvent containers when not in use. Similar requirements are found in the national rule and SCAQMD Rule 1113.

There are no monitori ng or recordkeeping requirements in proposed amendments to Rule 74.2. Test Methods have been included in proposed Rule
74.2 are needed to determine ROC content and other coating characteristics. These test methods do not
conflict with test methods cited in the national rule or SCAQMD Rule 1113. Distri ct staff has determined there are no other air pollu tion control requirement
elements that warrant revi ew in this comparative analysis.

IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED RULE REVISIONS

ROC Emissions Impacts

The emission reduction potential of proposed
amendments to Rule 74.2 is estimated at 0.5 tons of ROC per day. This estimate is based on the SCM reductions estimated by CARB staff adjusted for the population of Ventura County, which is 2.2 percent of the state population, a nd adjusted for 80 percent
rule effectiveness. The estimated rule effectiveness is based on the potential for abuse of the quart exemption and possible misuse of coatings by ignoring label recommendations. Without the correction for rule effectiveness, the estimated emission reductions based on the SCM analysis would have been 0.62 tons of ROC per day.

Socioeconomic Impacts Analysis

H & SC Section 40728.5 requires a district to perform an assessment of the socioeconomic impacts before adopting, amending, or repealing a rule that will significantly affect air quality or emission limitations. The district board is required to actively
consider the socioeconomic impact of the proposal and make a good faith effort to minimize adverse socioeconomic impacts. H & SC Section 40728.5 defines “socioeconomic impact” as the following:

1. The type of industry or business, including small business, affected by the rule.

2. The impact of the rule on employment and the economy of the region.

3. The range of probable costs, including costs to industry or business, including small
business.

4. The availability and cost-effectiveness of alternatives to the proposed rule.

5. The emission reduction potential of the rule.

6. The necessity of adopting the rule to attain
state and federal ambient air standards.

The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) amended their architectural coating Rule 1113 in 1996, 1999, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2006
and 2007. The final ROC limits from the latest adoption are more stringent than the 2007 SCM limits adopted by CARB, as shown in Table 2. SCAQMD routinely runs regional economic models
to determine socioeconomi c impacts of their rule adoptions and did so for their Rule 1113 adoptions.

Although the SCM is not a state regulation, CARB nevertheless analyzed th e economic impacts that

### Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 10

would result from implementation of the SCM ROC limits. Traditionally, Ventura County APCD has not used regional economic models in their socioeconomic analyses and is not proposing to do so in this rule development. Correspondence from
CARB staff to the Districts states that the analysis (Chapter 7, Economic Impacts, from the SCM staff report) is appropriate for us e by local air districts for determining costs and economic impacts from the proposed architectural coating rules. In addition, CARB emphasizes that it is not necessary for the districts to use a regional economic model to perform the economic analysis for the purpose of adopting
amendments to Rule 74.2 “because the cost increase
associated with the SCM is small (in comparison with the regional economy).”

Thus, for the purpose of this socioeconomic analysis, staff has summarized the relevant published cost and economic impacts from CARB and SCAQMD reports without doing additional economic surveys or running economic computer models.

Types of Affected Business and Industry Including Small Business

Proposed amendments to Rule 74.2 would potentially impact: (i) industries engaged in manufacturing paint, varnishes, enamels and allied products (SIC 2851); (ii) end users of architectur al coatings, including doit-yourself consumers, painting contractors (SIC 1721) that may be small businesses, and maintenance personnel; and (iii) suppliers, sellers, and solicitors of architectural coatings (SIC 5198, 5231). New construction and maintenance of the following may be impacted by this proposal: buildings; transportation infrastructure; industrial structures such as aboveground tanks; and any stationary
structure or appurtenance.

Economic Impacts

Introduction: The CARB analysis focused on the impact of the SCM on the profitability of coating manufacturers to determine employment impacts for their industry only. CARB relied heavily on survey responses from coating manufacturers. CARB staff evaluated employment, business creation, and business competitiveness for the coating
manufacturers in California.

CARB determined there would be little impact on coating manufacturers using their assessment techniques. Their analyses support a determination that proposed amendments to Rule 74.2 will not have an unacceptable adverse im pact on employment and the economy in Ventura County.

CARB Analysis: According to CARB staff, the SCM is not expected to caus e a noticeable change in California employment and payroll of the coating
manufacturers because the an alysis shows that the proposal will not significantly alter their profitability.

CARB staff estimated profitability impacts by analyzing the impact of these costs on return on equity (ROE) for selected sample coating manufacturers. The approach used to determine these economic impacts was as follows: 1. A sample of three representative businesses
of different sizes was selected from a list of
164 affected businesses based on the sales revenues and the quantity of noncompliant coatings they manufactured. 2. Compliance with the proposal was estimated
for each of these businesses. 3. Estimated cost was adjusted for federal and

state taxes. 4. The three-year average ROE was calculated
where data were available for each of these businesses by averaging their ROEs for 2004 through 2006. ROE is calculated by dividing the net profit by shareholders’ equity (net worth for privately held companies).

5. The adjusted cost was then subtracted from the net profit data. The results were used to calculate an adjusted three-year average
ROE.
6. The adjusted ROE was then compared with
the ROE before the subtraction of the adjusted cost to determine the potential impact on the profitability of the businesses.

ROE reductions ranged from a decline of 1.1 percent for large businesses to a decline of 4.7 percent for small businesses. A decrease of 10 percent in ROE or more was considered to be a significant adverse impact. The threshold value of 10 percent has been used consistently since 1990 by CARB staff to determine impact severity of proposed regulations.
This threshold is consistent with the thresholds used by EPA and others.

In reaching this conclusion, CARB assumed that coating manufacturers, both within and outside of California, would absorb all the costs from the adoption of this proposal. This represents the maximum impact on the manufacturers. This assumption of absorption of all costs would mean decreased profits for the coating manufacturers.

### Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 11

However, since coating manufacturing profitability is unlikely to be significantly reduced, employment, business creation and expansion, and business competitiveness should not be significantly affected for that industry, accordin g to CARB staff. CARB
noted that its estimates of the reductions in ROE might be high. It also noted, however, that since its analysis was based on assumptions that may not be true for all businesses, it was possible that some businesses might be adversely affected.

Conclusion: Because there are no architectural coating manufacturers in the county, there should be no local impact on ROE and very little impacts on employment, business creation and expansion, and business competitiveness for these companies.

Range of Probable Costs

The economic impacts discussed above are the result of cost increases, if any, caused by adoption of the proposed rule. In this section, we discuss the likely cost impacts. We have examined these cost impacts on manufacturers and consumers by looking at both the CARB and SCAQMD analyses. CARB staff prepared a detailed assessment of the expected costs in the SCM staff report. They examined both the economic impacts on the coating manufacturers and the consumers of coatings.

Proposed amendments to Rule 74.2 may impact consumers and other users of architectural coatings by increasing coating costs. CARB staff determined the maximum potential cost to consumers by assuming that manufacturers will pass on all
increases in reformulation costs. An evaluation of cost impacts to manufacturers is needed to perform this worst-case cost analys is for consumer impacts.

Cost Data Sources: CARB staff relied on industry responses to the 2007 ARB Economic Impacts Survey for coating costs sp ecific to manufacturers. ARB received 36 responses from a group of 147 manufacturers impacted by the proposed ROC limits. These responses were manufacturers’ best estimate of the costs of meeting th e proposal including evaluation of nonrecurring and recurring costs. Nonrecurring costs include research and development costs, product and consumer testing costs, new or modified capital equipment costs, and one-time marketing/label changes. Recurring costs include costs for raw materials, recordkeeping, and reporting.

The 2007 ARB Economic Survey responses represented a wide range of manufacturer sizes including a variety of large, medium, and small companies, representing about 39 percent of the architectural coatings market in California. Table 3 lists these respondents. Many companies will not be impacted by the proposal including those companies whose products already comp ly with the proposed limits and those companies that do not market products in those categories affected by the proposal. Twelve out of the 36 respondents indicated that they would not incur any costs to meet the SCM proposed
limits.



### TABLE 3 - Manufacturers Respondi ng to Economic Impact Survey

1 3M Company 19 Jones Blair 2 Ace Hardware Paint Division 20 Kelly Moore Paint Company 3 Bay Systems North America LLC 21 Life Paint Company

4 Bonakemi 22 Minuteman Int. – Multi Clean Division 5 Carlise Coating & Waterproofing Inc. 23 Mortex Manufacturing Co. Inc. 6 Connlin Company Inc. 24 Pacifi c Polymers International Inc. 7 Ellis Paint Company 25 Ponderosa Paint Company 8 Epmar Corporation 26 RJ McGlennon Inc. 9 ER Systems Inc. 27 Sherwin Williams 10 Frazee 28 Specialty Coat and Chemical 11 Gemini Industries 29 Technical Roofing and Solutions Inc. 12 Griggs Paint of Domcom Enterprises Inc. 30 The Garland Company 13 Henry Company 31 United Gilsonite Laboratories 14 Hillyard 32 United States Gypsum 15 Ingels Inc. 33 Valspar Architectural Coatings 16 Insi-X Products Corporation 34 Waterlox Coatings Corporation 17 Jasco Chemical Corporation 35 XIM Products Inc. 18 JFB Hart Coatings Inc. 36 ZRC Worldwide

### Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 12

In addition to the cost data supplied by manufacturers, CARB staff researched the raw material costs needed for coating reformulation. Sample complying and noncomplying product formulations were developed based on responses to ARB’s 2005 Survey, product data sheets, and input
from manufacturers. ARB determined the costs from changing raw materials need ed for reformulation by obtaining information from the Chemical Market Reporter Magazine, chem ical manufacturers, and
distributors of raw material s. In cases where a price range or multiple prices we re found for a particular ingredient, ARB used the highest price found in the analysis. For ingredients where no price information was available, a default value of $1.50 per pound was assigned to those ingredients. This value is higher than most of the ingredient prices used in the raw material cost analysis incl uding resins, which are the most expensive main ingredients.

In amending SCAQMD Rule 1113, cost estimates were based on cost information supplied by resin suppliers and some coating manufacturers. For the most part, resin suppliers were the most cooperative in providing price information.

Costs to Manufacturers: CARB staff determined
costs to manufacturers in California outside of the SCAQMD to reformulate noncompliant coatings to comply with the proposed ROC limits for each of the affected coating categories. The detailed calculations and assumptions may be found in the SCM staff report. The total annualized cost of the proposed SCM was $12.3 million, which consists of $4 million per year in nonrecurring costs and $8.3 million in annual recurring costs. For comparison, the total
annualized cost to ma nufacturers estimated by SCAQMD to meet the more stringent ROC limits was $73.6 million in 2006. The average annual cost of compliance in the South Coast district was estimated by AQMD staff at $58.3 million from 2002
to 2015. These numbers we re as reported in their respective economic analyses. A comparison of the total annual costs reported by CARB and SCAQMD analyses show much higher costs of compliance in the South Coast AQMD, most likely a result of their more stringent ROC limits and/or additional administrative requirements.

Conclusion: Since Ventura County is proposing to adopt the SCM rather than the South Coast AQMD Rule 1113, the cost to coating manufacturers will be significantly lower. Apportioning that cost to Ventura County using a population factor (4.1% of the state’s population excluding the South Coast district), the annualized costs to manufacturers to comply with proposed amendments to Rule 74.2 would be about $505,000 per year. As a comparison the Ventura County Gross County Product is about $24 billion. This cost of compliance would be significantly higher at $893,000 per year to adopt the limits in South Coast AQMD Rule 1113 based on a cost-effectiveness analysis performed by SCAQMD
in 2006.

Cost to Consumers

CARB Analysis: CARB staff projected the maximum potential impact on consumers by assuming that all the costs of reformulation in the previous section are passed on in the form of higher coating price. Using this assumption, the product cost increases for all impact ed categories ranges from a net savings to $6.82 per reformulated gallon with an average increase of 30 cents per gallon. The retail price increase is estimated using a 4X multiplier if
both the wholesaler and retailer each double the price. Part of this cost increase results from the training and service prov ided by wholesalers and retailers to their customers. Thus, the estimated maximum retail price increase would range from a net savings to $27.30 per reformulated gallon with an average increase of $1.21 per gallon as shown in the third column of Table 4. Assuming the average retail price of noncomplying coatings currently ranges from $11.84 to $38.70 per gallon with an average price of $19.20, the ma ximum increase in retail prices is 47 percent and the average increase is approximately six percent. The largest price
increases occur at industrial maintenance and other commercial coating applications.

CARB staff also estimated the expected costs to consumers. For ordinary consumers who use flat house paint, non-flat house paints, and Primers/Sealers/Undercoaters, CARB staff projects a price ranging from a net savings to a maximum $4.40 per reformulated gallon wi th an average potential increase of about $1.65 per gallon. They note that consumers may purchase currently available compliant flat and non-flat coatings with no increase in price due to reformulation. The competition among suppliers of these coatings will likely constrain any price increas es from reformulated coatings. Thus, costs to consumers from proposed
amendments to Rule 74.2 should be small.

SCAQMD Analysis: Results of the SCAQMD analysis are similar to the results of the CARB analysis. Based on available information, South Coast AQMD staff estimated that the Rule 1113 ROC standards would result in maximum price

### Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 13

increases for future complying coatings of up to 20 percent. The 1999 SCAQMD Socioeconomic Report for Rule 1113 projects a worst-case 20 percent increase across-the-board for all major categories. The SCAQMD price determinations for complying coatings were supported by information received by them from resin suppliers and coating manufacturers. The following sources we re cited by SCAQMD to provide coating price estimates:

• A case study by Devoe & Reynolds Co. published in Stirring Up Innovation (1994) noted a 10 percent increase in costs for <250 g/l industrial maintenance, non-flat and wood stain coatings.

• A Superior Coating paper at the April 28, 1998, SCAQMD Architectural Coatings Technology Conference ( Superior Performance Coatings ) noted a 0 to 10 percent increase in the cost per gallon of zero-ROC non-flat, primer sealer and undercoater, rust preventative, industrial maintenance and stain coatings.

• Another paper at the 1998 Architectural Coating Technology Conference indicated examples of zero-ROC flats, non-flats, primer sealer and undercoaters, rust preventatives, quick-dry enamels, floor coatings, industrial maintenance coatings, wood sealers and wood stain coatings that have superior or matching coating performance while simultaneously reducing production and application costs ( ROC free
Paints and Inks at No Extra Cost by G. Sugerman of PPA Technologies, a resin supplier).

• Norman Mowrer of Ameron International also presented a paper at the 1998 Technology Conference that reported
reduced costs for industrial maintenance coatings based on cost per performance
characteristics.

Conclusion: Although the maximum expected price impacts on consumers are sign ificant, the actual cost impacts are likely to be sm all because of competitive pricing pressures from existing complying coatings.



### Table 4 - Estimates of Projected Maximu m Coating Price Increases (ARB, 2007)
Coating Category Typical NonComplying Cost per
Gallon Cost Increase to Consumers per Gallon 6

Aluminum Roof $14.63 $1.16 Bituminous Roof $11.84 $6.43 Concrete Masonry Sealer $14.09 -$0.88 Dry Fog $34.86 -$3.96 Flat $17.81 -$0.33 Floor $16.96 $27.30 Mastic Texture $17.72 $8.61 Non Flat $19.44 $4.40 Non Flat High Gloss $23.96 -$3.39 Primer Sealer Undercoater $16.90 $2.51 Roof $29.94 $1.95 Rust Preventative $30.30 -$2.51 Specialty Primer Sealer Undercoater $25.19 -$6.32 Traffic Marking $14.18 $4.00 Waterproofing Membrane $33.38 $16.97 Wood Coatings $38.70 $-$6.34 Weighted Average $1.21

6 Cost increase per gallon is four times the sum of ra w material cost differences plus recurring costs of reformulation plus nonrecurring costs of reformula tion divided by the number of noncomplying gallons.

### Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 14

Cost to Small Business

The costs of the proposal to small businesses including small coating manufacturers, retailers, wholesalers, and painting contractors were evaluated based on studies performed by CARB and SCAQMD. CARB staff agai n focused on the cost incurred by coating manufacturers while the SCAQMD evaluated the cost impacts on painting
contractors. Staff believes that these studies are applicable to Ventura Coun ty because the economic factors affecting architectur al coating manufacturers, wholesalers, retailers and painting contractors is
similar to other areas of California.

CARB Analysis: CARB staff analyzed the impact of the SCM on the competitiveness of small business coating manufacturers that compete with large coating manufacturers. Ac cording to CARB staff, smaller coating manufacturers tend to cater to niche markets that are based on competitive factors other than price. These compan ies depend on specialty coatings, brand loyalty, cust omer service, and other non-price related factors.

According to CARB staff, small business retailers and wholesalers generally sell products from all types of manufacturers and should be unaffected by proposed amendments to Rule 74.2. High performance coatings that currently comply with the proposed ROC limits are available now from many different manufacturers. A list of coatings complying with the proposed standards was compiled by CARB staff and is shown in Appendix A. Thus, retailers should have an ample supply and a variety of products to sell.

SCAQMD Analysis: The SCAQMD staff analyzed the cost impacts to painting contractors in their analysis of amendments to their Rule 1113. Based on data from industry source s, the estimated average
annual cost of their ROC limits in the South Coast district was $32 million dollars to consumers and $26.3 million dollars to painting contractors (SIC 1721) from 2002 through 2015. According to SCAQMD staff, painting contractors and consumers could incur additional costs beyond these amounts. For the painting contractor, it could be the cost of training, learning, and testing the new reformulated coatings, and litigation costs. These additional costs are based on claims made by some coating manufacturers and some paint contractors and not on any empirical studies. These costs assume coating manufacturers pass through all reformulation costs to
end-users. Conclusion: An estimate of cost impacts to painting contractors in Ventura County was made by assuming that the cost breakdown (consumer vs. painting contractor) is similar to that found in the South Coast AQMD. This is a reasonable assumption because the type and quantity of work performed by painting contractors is expected to be similar in both regions on a per capita basis. SCAQMD staff estimates that 45 percent of the cost impact is experienced by painting contractors. Thus, the maximum cost impact to Ventura County area painting contractors would be 45 percent of $505,000, which is $227,000.

Emission Reduction Potential of the Rule

The emission reduction potential of proposed
amendments to Rule 74.2 is estimated at 0.5 tons of ROC per day. This estimate is based on the SCM ROC reductions 15( tons/day) estimated by CARB staff corrected by the population of Ventura County, which is 4.1 percent of the population of California excluding the South Coast AQMD and corrected by a rule effectiveness forecast of 80 percent. The rule
effectiveness is an estimate of lost emission reductions resulting from misuse of the small container exemption and misuse of coatings in
violation of label recommendations.

Cost-Effectiveness

Both CARB and SCAQMD staff reported costeffectiveness calculations for the SCM and Rule 1113 standards, respectively. The SCM, which is based partly on SCAQMD Rule 1113, is the basis for proposed amendments to Rule 74.2. In addition, ARB staff performed a sensitivity analysis with the increase in resin costs as the dependent parameter. This CARB analysis was performed using resin costs increasing at 10 percent, 20 percent, and 50 percent per year. Both reports include cost-effectiveness values for each of the majo r coating categories that are proposed for amendment.

The overall cost-effectivenes s of the new standards in the 2007 SCM is $1.12 per pound of ROC reduced according to CARB, which assume a conservative 20 percent increase in raw material resin costs. This is much less than the 1999 projection of $6.65 per pound of ROC reduced for SCAQMD Rule 1113 over the years 2002-2015(based on 1998 Dollars). The individual coating cat egory cost-effectiveness
results from the ARB anal ysis are summarized in Table 5. This table shows that many categories are

### Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 15

cost-effective and some of them are associated with cost savings. The $13.90 per pound ROC reduced for Floor Coatings results from the fact that large number of noncomplying coatings are sold in small volumes. However, the complying share of the floor coating market is 85 percent since many manufacturers have already reformulated their coatings. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the remaining
manufacturers can also reformulate.



### Table 5 - Cost-Effectiveness ($/lb. ROC Reduced)

Coating Category CARB 2007 SCM Aluminum Roof $0.41 Bituminous Roof $1.02 Concrete Masonry Sealer -$0.36 Dry Fog -$0.52 Flat -$0.69 Floor $13.90 Mastic Texture $2.38 Non Flat $7.03 Non Flat High Gloss -$1.38 Primer/Sealer/Undercoater $2.73 Roof $1.38 Rust Preventative -$0.46 Specialty
Primer/Sealer/Undercoater -$0.71

Traffic Marking $4.76 Waterproofing Membrane $6.55 Wood Coatings -$1.13 Overall Cost-Effectiveness $1.12

Conclusion : The cost-effectiveness of proposed
amendments to Rule 74.2 was calculated based on annualized costs projected by ARB staff. The total annualized cost was estimat ed at $505,000 based on apportioning manufacturer reformulation costs by the population of the county. The ROC emission reductions are anticipated to be 0.5 tons per day or365,000 pounds per year. Therefore, the costeffectiveness is the ratio of these numbers ($505,000/365,000 pounds) or $1.38 per pound of ROC reduced. This is much less than the $9 per pound of ROC reduced that is required for Best Available Control Technology for new stationary sources in the county.

Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

H & SC Section 40920.6(a) requires districts to identify one or more potential control options that achieve at least the same benefit as the proposed rule,
assess the cost-effectivene ss of those options, and
calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness. The only alternative that achieves at least the same benefit is the adoption of final ROC limits from South Coast AQMD Rule 1113. Proposed amendments to Rule 74.2 are based on the SCM which is not as stringent as the ROC limits from SCAQMD Rule 1113. As stated earlier, the cost-effectiveness of the ROC limits in Rule 1113 is $8.18 per pound of ROC
reduced. The incrementa l cost-effectiveness is calculated by dividing th e incremental annualized costs in the district by the incremental annual
emission reductions in the district. The incremental cost-effectiveness for this control option is $15.47 per pound of ROC reduced. These calculations are
summarized in Table 6.



### Table 6 Calculation of Incremental Cost-E ffectiveness for SCAQMD ROC Limits Option

I. OPTION CONTROL EFFICIENCY = 46% AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS = $8.18
II. Baseline Inventory = 2.1 tons/day for Ventura County Arch. Coatings III. Annualized Cost for Proposal = 0.50 tons/day X $1.38/lb = $505,000 IV. Option Emission Reductions = 2.1 tons/day X 46% = 705,180 lbs/year V. Option Annualized Cost = Cost-Effectiveness X Emis. Reductions = $8.18 X 705,180 lbs/yr = $5,768,372 VI. Incremental Annualized Cost = $5,768,180 - $505,000 = $5,263,372 VII. Incremental Annual Emis. Reductions = 705,180 – 365,000= 340,180 lbs/yr VIII. Incremental Cost-Effectiveness = $5,263,372 / 340,180 = $15.47 per pound

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF METHODS OF COMPLIANCE California Public Resources Code Section 21159 requires the District to perform an environmental analysis of the reasonably foreseeable methods of comp liance. The analysis must include th e following information on proposed
amendments to Rule 74.2:

(1) An analysis of the reasonably foreseeable environmental impacts of the methods of compliance. (2) An analysis of the reasonably foreseeable mitigation measures

.

### Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 16

(3) An analysis of the reasonably foreseeable alternative means of compliance with the rule or regulation.

Table 7 lists some reasonably foreseeable compliance me thods, the environmental impacts of those methods, and measures that could be used to mitigate the environmental impacts. A more detailed environmental analysis will be found in the staff environmental impact repo rt for proposed amendments to Rule 74.2.



### Table 7 Environmental Impacts and Mitigations of Methods of Compliance

Compliance Methods (including all reasonably fores eeable alternative means of compliance) Reasonably Foreseeable Environmental Impacts Reasonably Foreseeable Mitigation Measures

Reformulation of architectural coatings Air Quality Impacts: Reformulation may result in the use of toxic
materials. Operators may use reformulated coatings with less or no toxic
materials.

Water Impacts: Improper disposal of coatings may cause water impacts. Compliance with wastewater discharge standards and waste disposal requirements will mitigate these impacts.

Human Health Impacts: Coatings may be replaced with products containing more toxic compounds. Compliance with OSHA safety guidelines (e.g., personal protective equipment, prevention and response, emergency first aid procedures) reduces these impacts.

OTHER FACTORS

Technological Feasibility:

The ROC limits proposed in the amendments to Rule
74.2 are based on ROC lim its fully analyzed for technological feasibility by the Air Resources Board in the SCM and by the South Coast AQMD in its Rule 1113. Currently, coatings that meet the proposed ROC limits are being manufactured and sold in California (see CARB’s Staff Report for the Proposed Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings dated September 2007.)

Enforceability

Labeling requirements, reporting requirements, and testing procedures have been included in the proposed rule to increase its enforceability.

Public Acceptability

Staff is soliciting comments, but expects the rule and any associated costs to be acceptable to affected
manufacturers and users for the following reasons: • Future effective date for some ROC limits at
2012 will allow time for manufacturers to reformulate, if needed.

• A three-year sell-th rough provision will allow suppliers, retailers, and users to deplete existing coating inventories without penalty and without creating a hazardous waste problem.

• High-performance coatings are available now from many companies that comply with the proposed ROC limits. A list partial list of coatings that are compliant with the proposed ROC limits was tabulated by ARB staff and is provided in Appendix A.

• Coating price increases as a result of this proposal are not expected to be significant.

• Estimated profitability impacts on coating manufacturers are not expected to be significant.

### Rule 74.2 Staff Report ATTACHMENT 4 Page 17

Environmental Compliance and Review

Proposed amendments to Rule 74.2 strengthen the ROC content limits for architectural coatings. The rule creates new lower standards for specified coating categories. In addition, it will raise the ROC limits for a few specified coating categories. The rule may have a potentially adverse environmental impact. Pursuant to county administrative supplement to state CEQA Guidelines, the District staff will propose reusing the 2001 Environmental Impact Report prepared for the 2001 am endments to Rule 74.2. Future Technology Assessments

ARB and SCAQMD staffs have committed to conducting technology asse ssments for each coating category with lower proposed future limits one year prior to the effective date of the lowered limits. SCAQM has published Rule 1113 status reports on their website (aqmd.gov) for the following years: 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2007. This annual review by SCAQMD staff all proposed limits are feasible. However, the District’s rulemaking process is flexible enough for staff to revisit the rule and to make any appropriate changes
to the rule as needed in the future.

REFERENCES

Air Resources Board, Final Environmental Impact Report for the Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings (ARB, 2000)

Air Resources Board, Resolution 07-46, Agenda Item No. 07-10-5, October 26, 2007.

Air Resources Board, Staff Report for the Suggested
Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings (ARB, 2007)

Air Resources Board, Techni cal Support Document for Proposed Amendments to the SCM for Architectural Coatings, September 2007.

Air Resources Board, 2007 Draft Compliant Products
List.

Federal Register, “Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan: San Joaquin, Ventura and Santa Barbara,” September 20, 2002 (Vol. 67 No. 183).

Goldstene, James. N., Air Resources Board, Letter to Air Pollution Control Officers, February 1, 2008.

Mersburg, Al, “Superior Performance Coatings.” Proceedings of the April 28, 1998, Architectural Coatings Technology Conference, South Coast AQMD. Mowrer, Norman R., Ameron International. “High Performance Coatings Based on Epoxy Siloxane Hybrid Polymers.” Proceedings of the April 28, 1998, Architectural Coatings Technology Conference, SCAQMD.

South Coast AQMD Staff Repo rt for the Amendments to Rule 1113, Architectural Coatings, May 1999.

South Coast AQMD, Socioeconomic Report for the Amendments to Rule 1113, Architectural Coatings, May

1999.

South Coast AQMD Final Socioeconomic Impact Assessment to Proposed Amendments to Rule 1113,
October 1996.

Stirring Up Innovation . A case study by Devoe & Reynolds Co (Inform Inc. New York, NY, 1994)

Sugerman, Gerald, “ROC Free Paints and Inks at No Extra Cost.” Proceedings of the April 28, 1998,
Architectural

Van DeMark, Michael R. and Kathryn Sandefur, “Flat Coatings Technology Assessment” UMR Coatings Institute, University of Missouri-Rolla.

### Appendix I. (Staff Report Proposed Amendments to Rule 74.2)

Draft Compliant Products List compiled by the
California Air Resources Board for the 2007 Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings

### DRAFT



### California Air Resources Board Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings



## Draft Compliant Product Lists

The Air Resources Board (ARB) staff is curre ntly working on an update to the Suggested Control Measure (SCM) for Architectural Coatings . The SCM is a model rule which has been used by California air pollution c ontrol districts to develop and am end architectural coating rules.

During a public workshop on March 13, 2007, ARB st aff presented draft proposed changes for some of the categories covered by the SCM. These changes in cluded lower VOC limits, draft revised definitions, and proposed new categories. Industry repres entatives requested that ARB staff provide a list of products that would comply with the draf t proposed changes. In response to this request, ARB staff has compiled lists of products that would comp ly with draft proposed changes, as presented at the March 13 th 

### workshop. The lists on the following pages include: manufacturer or parent company; product name; and VOC Regulatory (grams/liter). This information is based on data reported in ARB’ s 2005 Architectural Coati ng Survey, product data sheets, and literature searches for new produc ts. Additional product information will be compiled in the SCM Staff Report (e.g., pr oduct features, usage limitations, etc.).

Compliant Product Lists are provid ed for the following categories:

• Aluminum Roof • Fire Retardant – Opaque • Roof

• Anti-Graffiti • Flat • Rust Preventative

• Basement Waterproofer • Floor • Specialty Primer, Sealer, Undercoater

• Bituminous Roof • Industrial Maintenance • Traffic Marking

• Concrete/Masonry Sealer • Mastic Texture • Waterproofing Membrane

• Driveway Sealer • Nonflat – High Gloss • Wood Coatings – Clear

• Dry Fog • Nonflat (Low Gloss & Medium Gloss) • Wood Coatings – Opaque

• Fire Retardant – Clear • Primer, Sealer, Undercoater • Zinc-Rich Primer



### These lists and the associated VOC limits are pr eliminary drafts and are subject to change. Please keep in mind that the number of comply ing products is not dir ectly related to the complying market share, which is based on sales volumes. For example, a short list of products may account for the bulk of the sales volume for one category, while a long list of products may account for only a small volume of another category.

For additional information on the SCM revisi on process, please visit our website at http://www.arb.ca.gov/c oatings/arch/arch.htm

.

If you have any questions about the SCM revi sion process, please contact Jim Nyarady, Manager, Strategy Evaluation Section, at (916) 322-8273 or jnyarady@arb.ca.gov

.

To provide comments on the draft compliant pr oduct lists, please cont act Monique Davis at (916) 324-8182 or mdavis@arb.ca.gov

.DRAFT ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings Compliant Product Lists

Compliant Product List.doc 2 21-May-07

ALUMINUM ROOF: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 400 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) APOC Aluminum Roof Coating 382

APOC Silver Dollar Super Bright 622-GA : Fibered Aluminum Roof Coating 377

APOC Aluminum Roof Coating 382 APOC Asphalt Emulsion Aluminum 115

APOC Silver Dollar 629-GA Waterbased Fibered Aluminum Roof Coating 115

APOC Silver Dollar 621-GA : Fibered Aluminum Roof Coating 377

APOC Black Jack Silver-Seal 500: 5180 Premium Waterbased Aluminum Coating 5

APOC Sunbrite Aluminum Roof Coating- APOC 400 115 Elastomeric Roofing Systems, Inc. Erathane 300 Finish Coat 327 Henry Company Economy Fibered Aluminum 389 Henry Company Aluminum Emulsion 46 Tremco Incorporated Vulkem 801 240

ANTI-GRAFFITI: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 150 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Gaco Western, Inc. S-14 50
RainGuard International Products Co, VandlGuard Non-Sacrificial Graffiti Coating 60

Scofield Systems Repello 100

SEI Chemical GPA-200 100

SEI Chemical GPC-100 50

SEI Chemical GPC-101 50 Textured Coatings of Amer ica Graffitigard IIIW 143 Thortex America, Inc. Wall-Tech A.G. Water-Based Polyurethane 65 Visual Pollution Technologies, Inc. Prmakote 15

BASEMENT WATERPROOFER: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 400 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Dap Inc. Kwik Seal Plus Basement Paint 140 Fiberlock Technologies, Inc. IAQ 9000 Mold-Resistant Masonry Waterproofer 156

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Confil HD Interior/Exterior Masonry Waterproofing Coating 397 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Tru-Glaze 4010 Waterproofing Base Coat & Filler 397 Sherwin-Williams Co. Colorplace Late x Waterproofing Basement Paint 83 Sherwin-Williams Co. H&C Block Shield Masonry Waterproofer 125 United Gilsonite Drylok Masonry Waterproofer 100 United Gilsonite Drylok Oil Ba se Masonry Waterproofer 388DRAFT ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings Compliant Product Lists

Compliant Product List.doc 3 21-May-07

BASEMENT WATERPROOFER: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 400 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Zinsser Okon Waterstopper 90

Zinsser WaterTite 384

Zinsser WaterTite - LV 92

BITUMINOUS ROOF: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 50 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) APOC Asphalt Emulsion 3 APOC Elastomeric Asphalt Emulsion Coating 4

APOC Modified Emulsion 4 APOC Aqua-Tec Roof & Foundation Coating 1 APOC Non-Fibered Asphalt Emulsion 4 APOC Fibered Asphalt Emulsion Roof Coating 4 Fields Company LLC Powrgard 0 Garland Company GarlaShield 0 Henry Company Asphalt Emulsion, WB 0 Karnak Corp. Fibered Emulsion Coating 0 Koppers Inc. Coal Tar Pitch 0

Mule-Hide Products Co. Mule Hide 301 Fibrated Emulsion; Mule-Hide 311 Non
Fibrated Emulsion 0

Sherwin-Williams Co. KST Coatings UV Resistant Black Patch & Coat 4

Southwestern Petroleum Corporation SWEPCO Flex Shield Roof Coating 0

Tremco Incorporated Tremlastic, Tremlastic S, Permaflex S 47

CONCRETE/MASO NRY SEALER: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l)

Benjamin Moore & Co. Moorlastic 100% Acrylic Elastomeric Waterproofing Coating, Low Lustre 055 and Flat 056 * 98 Benjamin Moore & Co. Moorlastic Acrylic Elastomeric - Fine Texture 060 50 Cal Western Paints, Inc. Alldeck Deck Coatings 20 Cal Western Paints, Inc. Duraflex Elastomeric Texture Coating 89 Cal Western Paints, Inc. Waterguard Clear Water Resistant Sealer 10

ChemMasters ColorLastic 48 Cloverdale Towerthon Plus Elastomeric Coating * 75 Columbia Paint & Coatings Elastech 100% Acrylic Elastomeric Coating * 96 Columbia Paint & Coatings Flex Pro Elastomeric Coating * 64 Conklin Company, Inc. Wall-Up Acrylic Latex Coating for Masonry Walls 61 Conspec Conspec Weatherseal WB 0 Conspec Spectrum WB 3 Davlin Coatings, Inc. Acrylastic 490 75 Dayton Superior Weather Worker WB Heavy Duty (J-27-WB) 0DRAFT ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings Compliant Product Lists

Compliant Product List.doc 4 21-May-07

CONCRETE/MASO NRY SEALER: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Degussa Building Systems Flexcoat 89 Degussa Building Systems Flextex 78 Degussa Building Systems Mastertop CST 0 Degussa Building Systems Silflex 79 Degussa Building Systems Thoroclear Special 0 Degussa Building Systems Thorolastic * 50 Degussa Building Systems Tuf-Trac 62 Diamond Vogel Permaflex Elastomeric Coating * 83 Drummond American Corporation Cloak Invisible Concrete Protector 0 Duron Duracrete Masonry Waterproofing Sealer * 47 Duron MaxFlex Elastomeric Coating * 72 Eco Safety Products, LLC Acri-Soy Penetrating Clear Satin Sealer 25 Eco Safety Products, LLC Eco-Tuff Acrylic-Urethane High Traffic Clear Coat 0 Eco-Wares Inc. Trojan Color Sealer 100 Eco-Wares Inc. Trojan Masonry Sealer 0

Edoco Burke Shield 244 WB 0 Epmar Corp. Kemiko Stone Tone Sealer 30 Euclid Chemical Company Euco-Guard VOX 26 Gaco Western, Inc. Gacoflex U-62 0 Gaco Western, Inc. Gacoflex UA-7090 48

General Paint Elasto-Wall * 88 Genesis Coatings Resource GCR 3 Clear Topcoat 0

Glaze 'N Seal Products "Natural Look" Penetrating Sealer 0 Glaze 'N Seal Products Stone Sealant Impregnator 0 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Decra- Flex 300 Elastomeric Coating System 70

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Hydro-Shur Waterproofing Systems Hydrolastic Elastomeric Waterproofing Coating, DRH5702 Smooth 55

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Hydro-Shur Waterproofing Systems Hydrolastic Elastomeric Waterproofing Coating, DRH5802 Textured 70 Green Building Supply GBS Penetrating Sealer 0

Gulf Coast Paint Mfg. Poly-Chem PC-1803 Clear 100% Solids Epoxy Concrete Glaze Coating 4 Henry Company HE-785 Asphalt Emulsion Trowel Grade 37 Henry Company HE-788 Non-Fibered Asphalt Emulsion Damproofing 0 Jasco Chemical Corp. Water Sealant III 0 Jones-Blair Co. Neogard FC7500 Fast-Cure Polyurethane Base Coat 3 Jones-Blair Co. Neogard FC7510 Fast-Cure Polyurethane Topcoat 21

Jones-Blair Co. Neogard FC7520 Fast-Cure Aromatic-Aliphatic Urethane Topcoat 89

Jones-Blair Co. Neogard FC7530 Fast-Cure Aliphatic Polyurethane Topcoat 35

Jones-Blair Co. Neogard FC7530 Fast-Cure Aliphatic Polyurethane Topcoat 34

Jones-Blair Co. Neogard FC7530 Fast-Cure Aliphatic Polyurethane Topcoat 34 Kelly-Moore Paint Co., Inc. 77 Kel-Seal Clear Masonry Water Repellent 0

Kelly-Moore Paint Co., Inc. Kel-Seal Terpolymer 100% Acrylic Elastomeric Coating (Textured) * 100 Kwal Paint Accu-Pro 100% Acrylic EMC Elasto-Wall * 69DRAFT ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings Compliant Product Lists

Compliant Product List.doc 5 21-May-07

CONCRETE/MASO NRY SEALER: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Kwal Paint Accu-Pro WB Interior/Exterior Clear Acrylic Sealer * 84 Kwal Paint Eloxatron X Water Repellent Clear * 10 Life Paint Company Stretch-Guard 92 Series Smooth Elastomeric Wall Coating 77 McCormick Paints Acrytex Interior/Exterior 100% Acrylic Texture Coating * 100

Merlex MicroSeal II 0 Monopole Inc. Monochem Dex-Coat * 50

Moxie International Moxie 1500 Concrete Sealer 0

Moxie International Moxi e Floor Sealer II 0 NCH Corporation Beauti-Trac Nonskid Epoxy Emulsion Floor Coating 65 NCH Corporation Inner Strength Penetrating Concrete Treatment 1 NCH Corporation Kolor-Traction Nonskid Epoxy Emulsion Floor Coating 40 New Image Coatings, LLC Seal-Once Concrete/Masonry Waterproofer 0 Niagara Protective Coatings 2K Acrylic Urethane W.B. 5

Niagara Protective Coatings Epoxal 100 Systems (HP-High Performance; WH-Work Horse; CR-Chemical Resistant) 0 Pacific Polymers International Elasto-Tex Deck Coating 84 Pacific Polymers International Elasto-Tex Wallcoating 68

Parker Paint EMC Elastomeric * 80 Poly-Carb, Inc. Mark-135.1 0 Poly-Carb, Inc. Mark-154 0 Ponderosa Paint Co., Inc. Agg-Epox 9000 0 Ponderosa Paint Co., Inc. Agg-Epox Sealer 9100 2 Ponderosa Paint Co., Inc. Perma-Floor 9200 12 PPG Industries, Inc. Perma-Crete 100% Acrylic Texture Coating * 57 PPG Industries, Inc. Perma-Crete High Build 100% Acrylic Topcoat 98 PPG Industries, Inc. Perma-Crete Pitt-Flex Elastomeric Coating * 98 Preserva Products, Ltd. Preserva-Crete 30 Rock-Tred Agua-Rock 46

Rock-Tred Chem-Rock Seal/Coat LV 1

Rock-Tred Exteseal 0

Rock-Tred Novo-Brite 12

Rock-Tred Novo-Poxi 12

Rock-Tred Penetred 0 Rodda Paint Super Roflex Elastomeric Coating * 89 Rodda Paint Super Roflex Texture Coating 79 Rust-Oleum Corp. Sierra Performance Gloss Concrete Epoxy Floor Coating * 0

Seal-Krete Concrete/G arage Floor Sealer 91 Seal-Krete Heavy-Duty Waterproofer 33 Seal-Krete Original Waterproofing Sealer 21 Sherwin-Williams Co. H&C WB-50 Water Based Water Repellent 0 Sherwin-Williams Co. Pro-Hide Gold Exterior Elastomeric Coating 100 Sherwin-Williams Co. Thompson's Water Seal Concrete Care Sealer 44 Sierra Corp. TK-290 WB Tri-Siloxane 60 Sika Corporation Sikadur 21 Lo-Mod LV 75 Sika Corporation Sikadur 22 Lo-Mod 56 Sika Corporation Sikagard 670W 77 Sika Corporation Sikagard 701W 43 Sinak Corporation Sinak Concrete Sealer S-102 0 Sinak Corporation Sinak LS-825 0DRAFT ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings Compliant Product Lists

Compliant Product List.doc 6 21-May-07

CONCRETE/MASO NRY SEALER: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Sinak Corporation Sinak Sealer HLQ-125 0

Spectra-Tone Paint Corp. Zaptex 100% Acrylic High Build Waterproofing Elastomeric Coating #230 & #235 * 82 Sto Corp Stolastic 212 Smooth 76

Surface Protection Industries Inc. Polyplex Overglo Clear Glaze 56 Symons Siloxane/Silane 20% WB 0
Tamms Industries Baracade WB 244 50 Tamms Industries Chemstop WB * 50

Tamms Industries Tammolastic * 50

Tamms Industries Tammscoat 50 Textured Coatings of America Strata Grip 80 Textured Coatings of America TexCote Stretch 74 Textured Coatings of America TexCote SuperCote Cool Wall 50 ThorWorks Industries, Inc. Sealmaster ColorPave 59 ThorWorks Industries, Inc. Sealmaster ColorPave HD500 71 Tnemec Company Inc. Deco -Clear Series 284 28 Tnemec Company Inc. Deco-Fleck Series 224 18 Tnemec Company Inc. Deco-Tread Series 222 18 Tnemec Company Inc. Power-Tread FC Series 238 32 Tnemec Company Inc. Powe r-Tread Series 237 30 Tnemec Company Inc. Satinglaze Series 285 21 Tremco Incorporated Decktite WDS Water Dispersed Silane Sealer 0 Tremco Incorporated Solargard Hy-Build 80 Tremco Incorporated Vulkem 345 NF El astomer, Waterproof Traffic Bearing 71

Tremco Incorporated Vulkem 351 NF Neighbor Friendly Low Odor/No VOC Pedestrian Deck Coating System and Vulkem 346 NF Elastomeric, Waterproof Traffic Bearing 70 Tremco Incorporated Wall-Tite 12 Tremco Incorporated Wall-Tite F 80 True Value Manufacturing Tru-Seal Clear Waterproofer for Masonry (CS-4) 14 United Coatings Manufacturing Co. Aquathon 10 United Coatings Manufacturing Co. Rhino Top Acrylic/Epoxy Emulsion Coating 92 Valspar Corporation Water Sealer 94 Versatile Building Products 4001 Epoxy Sealer/Primer 22 Versatile Building Products 4010 Monolithic Concrete Coating System (MCCS) 49 Versatile Building Pro ducts Versaglaze 100 Versatile Building Products Waterborne CRU 5400 and 5410 45 Vista Paint Corporation 1900 Weather Master * 89 W.R. Meadows Inc. Sealtight Sealmastic 0 *MPI Approved Product

DRIVEWAY SEALER: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 50 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) APOC Gardner 055-GA: Blacktop Driveway Crack Filler 6 APOC Crack Stopper 057-GA: Blacktop Elastomeric Crack Filler 5DRAFT ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings Compliant Product Lists

Compliant Product List.doc 7 21-May-07

DRIVEWAY SEALER: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 50 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) APOC Drive-Kote Driveway Filler & Sealer 4

APOC Gardner Pro-Gel 068-GA 9

APOC Black Jack 6414: Asphalt Emulsion Driveway Sealer - 1

year 8

APOC Emulsion Driveway Filler Sealer 7 APOC Driveway Blacktop Sealer 8

APOC Black Jack Freeway 6426: Blacktop Driveway Sealer - 4

year 7

APOC Black Jack Speedway 6427 : Advanced Gel Driveway Sealer - 6 year 9

APOC Black Jack 6435: Blacktop Crack Filler 6 APOC Pourable Driveway Crack Sealer 5 APOC Driveway Sealer 9

APOC Gardner Drive-Kote: E-Z Stir Driveway Sealer -3 year 7 APOC Raceway Filler Sealer Driveway Sealer 4 Cal Western Paints, Inc. Asphalt Emulsion Sealer 5 Conklin Company, Inc. Mast er Guard Asphalt Sealer 11 Conklin Company, Inc. Master Guard Pourable Crack Filler 8 Conklin Company, Inc. Master Guard Trowelable Crack Filler 11 Henry Company Asphalt Emulsion Driveway Sealer 0 Henry Company Asphalt Emulsion Driveway Sealer w/VOC 23 Henry Company Coal Tar Pitch Sealer 3 NCH Corporation Texite 111; Top Guard; Strong Seal 0 ThorWorks Industries, Inc. Coal Tar Sealer 42 ThorWorks Industries, Inc. LV Pavement Sealer 12 ThorWorks Industries, Inc. MasterSeal E.Z. Stir 3 ThorWorks Industries, Inc. MasterSeal Ready Mix 4 ThorWorks Industries, Inc. MasterSeal 3 ThorWorks Industries, Inc. Polymer Modified Coal Tar Sealer 41

DRY FOG: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 150 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Benjamin Moore & Co M53S Sweep-Up Spray Latex Semi Gloss 40 Dunn-Edwards Aquafall Latex Dry Fog Eggshell 50 Dunn-Edwards Aquafall Latex Dry Fog Flat 30 Frazee Industries Latex Dry Fall Flat White 49

Glidden Company Spraymaster Pro Uni-Grip-WB Aquacrylic Dryfall Eggshell
Primer & Finish 26

Glidden Company Spraymaster Pro Uni-Grip-WB Aquacrylic Dryfall Flat
Primer & Finish 27

Glidden Company Spraymaster Pro Uni-Grip-WB Aquacrylic Dryfall SemiGloss Primer & Finish 39 Kelly-Moore Paint Co., Inc. Dry Fog II Flat Maintenance Finish 50 Vista Paint Corporation DF 12 Dry Fall Water-Based Flat 130DRAFT ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings Compliant Product Lists

Compliant Product List.doc 8 21-May-07

FIRE RETARDANT - CLEAR: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 50 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) FireTect WT-103 Flame Retardant Clear Matte Coating. 47

Flame Control Coatings, LLC No. 133 Class “B” Water Base Fire Retardant Polyurethane
Varnish 24 Flame Stop Flame Stop I 0 Flame Stop Flam e Stop I-DS 0 Flame Stop Flame Stop II 0 Hy-Tech Thermal Solutions Hy-Tech Flam e Resist Flame Retardant Coating 0

FIRE RETARDANT - OPAQUE: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 50 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Benjamin Moore & Co. 220 (M59) Latex Fire Retardant Coating 0 Cal Western Paints, Inc. Latex Opaque Fire Retardant BF200 46 GCI International, Inc. Coustic Coat (12 Opaque Fire Retardant) 11 NoFire Technologies, Inc. NoFire A18 40 PPG Industries, Inc. Latex Fire Retardant Paint 42-7* 32

Thermal Product Research Fire Heatshedder 0 Thermal Product Research Firesafe Non-Flammable fire retardant paint 0 Thermal Product Research Non-Flammable Exterior Topcoat 0

W.R. Grace & Co. - Conn. Flame Safe FS 3000 Firestop Coating 26

FLAT: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 50 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Alistagen Corporation Caliwel with BNA Antimicrobial Interior Latex Covering 0 Benjamin Moore & Co. 219 Eco Spec Interior Latex Flat 0 Best Paint Co., Inc. Microsol 2020 Flat Interior Latex 0

California Paint Fresh Coat Low odor Low VOC Acrylic Latex Flat with
Microban 15 Conco Paints Pure Low Odor Interior Flat Acrylic Wall & Ceiling Paint 0

Dunn Edwards Walltone Interior Latex Flat Paint W420 35

Dunn Edwards Paint Ecoshield Low Odor/ Zero VOC Interior Latex Flat Paint 10 Dunn Edwards Paint Super-Wall Interior Latex Flat Paint W6420 50 Dunn Edwards Paint Super-Wall Ready To Use Interior Latex Flat Paint W6403 50

Dunn Edwards Paint Ultra-Sc rub Interior Scrubbable Latex Flat Paint W6400 50 Duron Paints Genesis Odor Free Interior Acrylic Latex Flat 35 Evr-Gard Coatings 1400 Flat Evrcare 0

Frazee Envirokote Low Odor- Low VOC Flat Finish 10 Green Planet Paints Clay Paint Interior Matte Wall Paint 0 ICI Paints 6400 Ultra-Hide Speed-Wa ll Latex Flat Interior Wall Paint 24
ICI Paints Lifemaster 2000 Interior Flat 0 ICI Paints Speed-Wall Latex Flat Interior Wall Paint 1250-XX 18DRAFT ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings Compliant Product Lists

Compliant Product List.doc 9 21-May-07

FLAT: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 50 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l)
ICI Paints- Fuller O Brien Crown Coat Interior -Exterior Flat Latex Finish FOB 802-10 18

ICI Paints- Fuller O Brien Interior Flat Latex Wall Paint 600 18 ICI Paints- Fuller O Brien Liquid Ceiling Interior Acrylic Latex Matte Flat Paint 109 18

ICI Paints- Glidden Devoe Paint Wonder-Hide Interior/Exterior Flat Paint

DR533XX 37
ICI Paints- Glidden FOB 600-X Interior Flat Latex Wall Paint 18 ICI Paints- Glidden Promaster MP 6400 Flat Latex Wall and Ceiling Paint 35

ICI Paints- Glidden Speed-Cote Exterior Latex Flat Masonry Finish 2240-

XXXX 22 ICI Paints- Glidden Speed-Wall Latex Matte Flat Interior Wall Paint 1251 33

ICI Paints- Glidden Ultra-Hide Airless High Build Latex Flat Interior
Primer/Finish 1260-XXXX 46

ICI Paints- Glidden Wonder Pure No VOC/Odor Interior Flat Wall Paint DR

31XX 0 Insl-x Coronado Paint Air Care Odorless AcrylicFlat 0 Kelly Moore Paint Co., Inc. 119 Kel Pro Interior Latex Flat Wall 45 Kelly Moore Paint Co., Inc. 1500 Enviro-Cote Interior Acrylic Flat Wall Paint 15 Kelly Moore Paint Co., Inc. 485 Ezy-Coat Interior Acrylic Flat Wall Paint 35

Kwal Paint EnviroKote Interior Latex Flat 45

MAB Paints Enviro-Pure Latex Flat 0

Old Masters Health Kote Interior Latex Flat 0

PPG Pure Performance Interior Flat Latex 0 PPG Industries, Inc 14-110 Speedpro Interior Wall & Ceiling Flat Latex 17 PPG Industries, Inc 57-610 Builder's Sp ec High Build Interior Flat Latex 32 PPG Industries, Inc Pittsburg Paints Interior Ceiling Paint Flat Latex 24 PPG Industries, Inc Speedcraft Interior Wall & Ceiling Flat Latex 5-70 Series 32 PPG Industries, Inc Speedhide Interior Wall Flat Latex 6-70 Series 17 PPG Industries, Inc UC65307 Builders Hi Build Interior Touch Up Flat Latex 42 PPG Industries, Inc UC80021 Speedhide Interior Low Odor Wall Flat Latex 17 PPG Industries, Inc (Porter) Pro-Master 2000 Flat Wall Interior Latex Wall Paint 50

Rodda Paint Horizon Flat Interior Wall Paint 0

Rodda Paint Horizon Pearl Lustre Interior Wall Paint 563501 0

Rodda Paint Interior Flat Wall Paint- White Base 33663 46

Rodda Paint Master Painter Pearl Luster 49 Sherwin Williams AcryShell 100% Acrylic Exterior Latex Flat 42

Sherwin Williams Cal-Scrub Interior Scrubbable Flat 50

Sherwin Williams Color Accents Interior Latex Flat Y10 Series 50

Sherwin Williams Duration Home Interior Latex Matte A96-100 Series 37 Sherwin Williams Harmony Interior Latex Flat B5 Series 0

Sherwin Williams ProMar 200 XP Interior Latex Flat 49

Sherwin Williams ProMar 700 Interior Latex Flat 41

Sherwin Williams ProTouch Interior Latex Flat 49 Sico Interior Latex Paint 100% Acrylic- Design Finish 0

Southern Diversified Products LLC American Pride Paint Interior Flat Latex Paint 0

Southern Diversified Products LLC American Pro Professional Grade Interior Latex Paint 0 Spectra Tone Eagle Odorless No VOC Solvent Free Flat Interior 0 United Coatings Manufacturing Co Century 2000 30 Vista Paint Corporation 2000 Duratone 17 Vista Paint Corporation 2800 Coverall Exterior Flat 46DRAFT ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings Compliant Product Lists

Compliant Product List.doc 10 21-May-07

FLAT: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 50 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Vista Paint Corporation 3600 Coverall Maintenance Flat 44 Vista Paint Corporation 6100 Carefree Earth Coat Flat 6

Yolo Colorhouse Yolo Colorhouse Flat Interior Paint 0

FLOOR: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Advanced Polymer Technology Corp. Qualipur 5401 3 Advanced Polymer Technology Corp. Qualipur 5511 Unipack 14 Behr Process Corporation 1-Part Epoxy Concrete & Garage Floor Paint 97 Behr Process Corporation Premiu m Plus Porch & Floor Paint 48

Cal Western Paints, Inc. Latex Epoxy Deck Paint and Top Coat Non-Skid Deck Coating - Slurry Finish 58 Cal Western Paints, Inc. Tennis Court Coatings 70 Color Wheel Paint Manufacturing Company Latex Floor Paint 100 Eco Safety Products, LLC Eco Procote Eco-Tuff Rubberized Non Skid Safety Coating 0 Eco Safety Products, LLC Non Skid Acrylic-Polyurethane Wood Coating 0 Ellis Paint Company 2K Epoxy Floor Coating 0 General Paint Porch and Floor Enamel Acrylic Latex * 68 General Paint Spantex Deck Coating Acrylic Latex * 83

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Groundworks Interior/Exterior Water-Based Porch & Floor
Satin Enamel * 89

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Groundworks Water-Based Acrylic Anti-Skid Porch & Floor Coating 75 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Porch & Floor Acrylic Latex Satin * 89 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Porch & Floor Interior/Exterior Acrylic Satin Enamel * 89 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Porch & Floor Latex Satin 89 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Spred Floor Acrylic Latex 89 Kelley Technical Coatings, Inc. Patio Deck Tones 80 PPG Industries, Inc. Floor, Porch & Deck Satin Latex 95 PPG Industries, Inc. Latex Floor Paint 83 Rust-Oleum Corp. EpoxyShield Garage Floor Coating 84 Scotch Paint Corp Acrilox 100% Acrylic Floor Paint 99 Seal-Krete Epoxy-Seal Concrete & Garage Floor Paint 93 Seal-Krete Floor-Tex Non-Slip Textured Coating 80

Sherwin-Williams Co. Colorplace Interior/Exterior Latex Satin Porch & Floor
Paint 81

Sherwin-Williams Co. Latex Satin Porch & Floor Enamel 99

Sherwin-Williams Co. Performer Porch, Floor & Deck Latex Flat Interior/Exterior
Enamel 99
Sherwin-Williams Co. Porch & Floor Enamel Interior/Exterior 50 Sherwin-Williams Co. Weatherbeater Porch, Floor, & Deck Latex 72 Simpson Coatings Group, Inc. Deco-Tex Non-Skid Coating 98DRAFT ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings Compliant Product Lists

Compliant Product List.doc 11 21-May-07

FLOOR: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Spectra-Tone Paint Corp. Industron 100% Acrylic Patio & Deck Paint #900 97 United Gilsonite Laboratories Drylok Concrete Floor Paint 90 Valspar Corporation American Tradition Latex Floor 92

Valspar Corporation American Tradition Skid Not Interior/Exterior Skid Resistant Coating 99 Valspar Corporation Colorplace Anti-Skid 100 Valspar Corporation Colorplace Latex Floor 93 Valspar Corporation Colo rplace Oil Floor Satin 93 Valspar Corporation Skid Resistant Finish 99 Valspar Corporation Valspar Latex Floor Enamel 92 Versatile Building Products 4800 Epoxy Sealer 2 Versatile Building Products 5073 Polyurea Sealer 50 Vista Paint Corporation 400 Acripoxy 80 *MPI Approved Product

INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 250 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l)
Ameron International 2 Amerlock 153

Ameron International 335 Amercoat 206

Ameron International 351 Amercoat 1

Ameron International 400 Amerlock 163

Ameron International 700 PSX 6

Ameron International 78HB Amercoat 241

Ameron International Amershield 196

Ameron International Amershield VOC 161 Benjamin Moore & Co. M45, M4684 Epoxy Mastic Coating 185

C.I.M. Industries Inc. CIM 1000 91 Carboline Company Bitumastic 300M 223 Carboline Company Carboguard 875 HS & GATX 154 Carboline Company Carboguard 890 202 Carboline Company Carboguard 891 217 Carboline Company Carbothane 134 VOC 189 Carboline Company Nullifire S607 158 Carboline Company Phenoline 309 4 Carboline Company Plasite 4100/4110 57 Carboline Company Plasite 4500 0 Carboline Company Plasite 9052 183 Carboline Company Plasite 9060 122 Carboline Company Polibrid 705 0 Degussa Building Systems Thoroc IC2480 49 Degussa Building Systems Thoroc IC5400 0 Epmar Corp. SS1515-1 Black 0 Gaco Western, Inc. LM60 0 ICI 4208 Devflex QD Waterborne Gloss Enamel 215 ICI Bar Rust 235H Multipurpose Epoxy Coating 234DRAFT ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings Compliant Product Lists

Compliant Product List.doc 12 21-May-07

INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 250 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l)
ICI Devflex 4205 Interior Exterior Acrilic Latex 136 ICI Devflex 4206 QD Waterborne Semigloss Enamel 225 ICI Devran 224 HS Epoxy High Build Coating 222 ICI Devran 724 Gloss Epoxy Coating 211 ICI Devthane 379H Aliphatic Urethane Gloss Enamel 238 ICI Tru-Glaze WB 4030 Epoxy Primer 193 ICI Tru-Glaze WB 4406 Semi-gloss Epoxy 198 ICI Tru-Glaze WB 4408 Waterborne Epoxy Gloss 227 International Coatings ICO Guard Coatings 0

International Paint LLC/Akzo Nobel Coatings Intercryl 530/520 WB 213
International Paint LLC/Akzo Nobel Coatings Intergard 735 162 ITW Devcon Epoxy Coat 7000 AR 0 ITW Devcon Epoxy Coat 7000 Non-VOC 55 ITW Devcon Styrothane 5324 1

ITW Devcon Ultrachrome 452S 131 ITW Philadelphia Resins Impax 3300 LV-N 44 ITW Philadelphia Resins Impax 650 SL 0 JFB Hart Coatings, Inc. GlossTek-100 Clear 56 Jones-Blair Co. Multi-Grip 2 Acrylic Primer 200 Milamar Coatings, LLC PM400 145 Pittsburg Paints 90-374 Pitt-Tech Latex Gloss 188 Pittsburg Paints 95-812 Pitthane Ultra Gloss Urethane Enamels 241 Pittsburg Paints 98-1 Aquapon WB 250 Polymerica,Inc. MasterShield Epoxy Primer Sealer 0 Rust-Oleum Corp. 3100 Speedy Dry Top Coat 225 Rust-Oleum Corp. 5300 WB Epoxy 179 Rust-Oleum Corp. Epoxy Shield Base 220 Sherwin-Williams Co. Bond-Plex Water Based Acrylic Coating 186

Sherwin-Williams Co. Centurion Water-Based Urethane 87

Sherwin-Williams Co. Corothane I - Ironox A HS CA 242 Sherwin-Williams Co. DTM Bonding Primer 43

Sherwin-Williams Co. Dura-Plate UHS Clear Laminant 169 Sherwin-Williams Co. Hi-Solids Polyurethane Gloss CA 235 Sherwin-Williams Co. Macropoxy 646 Fast Cure Epoxy 225 Sherwin-Williams Co. Macropoxy 646 NSF Fast Cure Epoxy 224 Sherwin-Williams Co. Metalatex Semi-Gloss Coating 100

Sherwin-Williams Co. Pro-Cr yl Universal Primer 89 Sherwin-Williams Co. Sher-Clear 1K Acrylic Clearcoat 100 Sherwin-Williams Co. Sher-Cryl HP A High Performance Acrylic 176 Sherwin-Williams Co. Sher-Tile HS High Solids Epoxy Coating 250

Sherwin-Williams Co. Tank Clad HS 249 Sherwin-Williams Co. Tar Guard Coal Tar Epoxy 221 Sherwin-Williams Co. Water Based Catalyzed Epoxy 140 Sherwin-Williams Co. Waterbased Tile-Clad Epoxy Finish 186 Sigma Coatings USA B.V. Sigma Edgeguard 13 Sigma Coatings USA B.V. Sigma Edgeguard Primer 13 Sigma Coatings USA B.V. Sigmacover TCP 232DRAFT ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings Compliant Product Lists

Compliant Product List.doc 13 21-May-07

INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 250 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Sika Corporation Sika Proof Seal 0 Sika Corporation SikaTop Seal 107 76 StonCor Group, Inc. Primer Standard 8 StonCor Group, Inc. Stonblend RTZ 10 StonCor Group, Inc. Stonclad GS 56 StonCor Group, Inc. Stonglaze VSC 72 StonCor Group, Inc. Stonkote GS4 0 StonCor Group, Inc. Stonkote HT4 0 StonCor Group, Inc. Stonlux AT 41 Tennant Company Eco-HPS 120 Tennant Company Eco-MPE 2 Tnemec Company Inc. Series 1075 Endura-Shield II 220 Tnemec Company Inc. Series 141 Pota-Pox 80 157 Tnemec Company Inc. Series 166 Epoxoline HS 171 Tnemec Company Inc. Series 18 Enviro-Prime 180 Tnemec Company Inc. Series 280 Tneme-Glaze 23 Tnemec Company Inc. Series 297 Enviro-Glaze 109 Tnemec Company Inc. Series 30 Spra-Saf EN 192 Tnemec Company Inc. Series 406 Elasto-Shield 21 Tnemec Company Inc. Series 46H Hi-Build Tneme-Tar 229 Tnemec Company Inc. Series 84 Cremlon ENV 181 Tnemec Company Inc. Series V140 Pota-Pox Plus 233 Tnemec Company Inc. Series V69 Hi-Build Epoxoline II 233 Trinity Coatings Co. Gray W/B Primer 231 Trinity Coatings Co. Red Oxide Primer 205 United Coatings Manufacturing Co. Elastuff 120 0 Vista Paint Corporation Premogloss 167

MASTIC TEXTURE: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Davlin Coatings, Inc. Acrylastic 490TC 30 Dunn-Edwards Flex-Tex Texture Coating * 58 EVR-Gard Coatings 119 Elastomeric Wall Coating 70

Frazee Industries EMC Elasto-Wall Textured: Exterior Elastomeric Texture
Finish * 63

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Ultra-Hide Buildtex Interior/Exterior High-Build Acrylic Latex Texture Coating * 84 Kelly-Moore Paint Co., Inc. 1112 Kel-Tex * 75 Kwal Paint Tilt-Tex V 100% Acrylic Texture Coating * 71 ParexLahabra, Inc. LaHabra Acrylic Finish 10 ParexLahabra, Inc. LaHabra Elastomeric Finish 7 Textured Coatings of America TexCote 400 96 Vista Paint Corporation 500 Solotex * 68 *MPI Approved ProductDRAFT ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings Compliant Product Lists

Compliant Product List.doc 14 21-May-07

NONFLAT – HIGH GLOSS: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 125 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Dunn Edwards Spartagloss Interior/Exterior Acrylic Gloss Paint 89 Dunn Edwards Versagloss 125

ICI Paints Dulux Advanced Oil Interior/Exterior Semi-Gloss Wall &
Trim Enamel 100

ICI Paints Mirrolac Speed Interior/Exterior Alkyd Gloss Enamel

DP74XX 120 ICI Paints Modified Acrylic Interior/Exterior Gloss Enamel 93

ICI Paints - Dulux Dulux Advanced Oil Interior/Exterior Gloss Wall & Trim
Enamel 120 Kelly Moore Paint Co., Inc. 1600 Kel-Namel Interior Latex Gloss Enamel 110 Sherwin Williams Co. SuperPaint Exterior High Gloss Latex Enamel A85 Series 98

Sherwin Williams Co. The Look High Gloss Oil Modified Acrylic Enamel

B39WJ351 100 Vista Paint Corporation 7600 Coverall Latex 49 Vista Paint Corporation 8500 Carefree Gloss 119

NONFLAT (LOW GLOSS): Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Ace Hardware Corporation 185A Quality Touch Satin Wall & Trim 50 Benjamin Moore & Co. Eco Spec Interior Latex Eggshell Enamel 223 1 Benjamin Moore & Co. Moorcraft Super Hide Latex Eggshell Enamel C286 99 Benjamin Moore & Co. MoorGard 103 Lustre Acrylic Fortified House Paint 100 Best Paint Co., Inc. Microsol 2030 Eggshell Interior Latex 0 Best Paint, Inc Duracryl Eggshell Interior/Exterior Acrylic Latex 50

California Paints Fresh Coat Low Odor Low VOC Acrylic Latex Eggshell
with Microban 0

Frazee 029 Envirokote Interior Low Odor - Low VOC Eggshell
Finish 10

Frazee Paints 215 Royal Supreme: Exterior 100% Acrylic Low Lustre
Finish 90
Frazee Paints 22 Lo Glo: Interi or Acrylic Eggshell Enamel 95 ICI Paints Crown Coat Interior Latex Eggshell Enamel FOB804-XX 68

ICI Paints Devoe Paint Wonder Speed Interior Latex Eggshell Latex
Enamel DR526XX 44

ICI Paints Devoe Paint Wonder-Hide Interior/Exterior Eggshell
Enamel DR535XX 45

ICI Paints Dulux Advanced Oil Interior/Exterior Eggshell Wall &
Trim Enamel 1502 100
ICI Paints Evermore Interior Latex Satin EM62XX 49 ICI Paints Lifemaster 2000 Interior Eggshell 0 ICI Paints Liquid Lustre Interior Latex Silk Enamel FOB 604-XX 100

ICI Paints Mirrolac Speed Interior/Exterior Alkyd Eggshell Enamel

DP72XX 75 ICI Paints Ralph Lauren Interior Eg gshell Exceptional Quality Acrylic 58DRAFT ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings Compliant Product Lists

Compliant Product List.doc 15 21-May-07

NONFLAT (LOW GLOSS): Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l)

Latex RL35XX

ICI Paints Ralph Lauren Interior Eggshe ll Premium Quality Acrylic
Latex Paint RL15XX 84

ICI Paints Ralph Lauren Interior Satin Premium Quality Acrylic Latex

RL12XX 84

ICI Paints Speed-Wall Latex Eggshell Interior Wall & Trim Enamel

1452-XXXX 84

ICI Paints Ultra-Hide Build-Dur Spray Latex Eggshell Interior
Primer/Finish 77 ICI Paints Uniko Interior Latex Eggshell Enamel FOB 218-XX 83

ICI Paints- Glidden America's Finest Interior Latex Satin 48 ICI Paints- Glidden Evermore Interior Latex Eggshell 47 Insl-x Coronado Paints Air Care Odorless Acrylic Eggshell 1230 Line 0 Kelly Moore Paint Co., Inc. 1245 Acry-Shield 100% Acrylic Exterior Low Sheen Paint 100 Kelly Moore Paint Co., Inc. 1510 Enviro-Cote Interior Acrylic Eggshell Enamel 15 Kwal Paint EnviroKote Interior Eggshell Enamel 9 MAB Paints Enviro-Pure Latex Eggshell Enamel 0 Old Masters/Diamond Vogel Paints Health Kote Interior Latex Eggshell 0 Old Masters/Diamond Vogel Paints Pro Plus Interior Latex Eggshell Enamel 89 PPG Pure Performance Interior Eggshell Latex 0 PPG Speedhide Interior Latex Enamel 73

Rodda Paint Horizon Exterior Satin 96

Rodda Paint Horizon Satin Interior Wall Paint 523501 0

Rodda Paint Master Painter Interior Latex Satin Wall Paint 523101 93

Sherwin Williams Duration Home Interi or Latex Satin A97-100 Series 37 Sherwin Williams Harmony Interior Latex Eg-shel 0 Sico Chamois Interior Latex Paint 100% acrylic- Design Finish 0

Southern Diversified Products LLC American Pride Paint Interior Eggshell Latex Paint 0 Spectra Tone Eagle Odorless No VOC Solvent Free Eggshell Interior 0

Spectra Tone Gold Label Spectra-Tough Interior Latex Low Luster
Enamel 100 Vista Paint Corporation 1200 Coverall Production Low Sheen 47 Vista Paint Corporation 1700 Coverall Low Sheen 45 Vista Paint Corporation 6200 Carefree Earth Coat Velva Sheen 8 Vista Paint Corporation 6300 Carefree Earth Coat Eggshell 7 Vista Paint Corporation 8200 Carefree Velva Sheen 47 Vista Paint Corporation MB30 Aurora Bond II 47

Yolo Colorhouse Yolo Colorhouse Satin Interior Wall Paint 0

NONFLAT (MEDIUM GLOSS): Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Benjamin Moore & Co. Eco Spec Interior Latex Semi-Gloss Enamel 224 11 Benjamin Moore & Co. Moorcraft Super Craft Latex Semi Gloss Enamel 252 62 Benjamin Moore & Co. Moorcraft Super Hide Latex Semi-Gloss Enamel 96 Benjamin Moore & Co . Moorcraft Super Spec 100% Acrylic Latex Low Lustre 48DRAFT ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings Compliant Product Lists

Compliant Product List.doc 16 21-May-07

NONFLAT (MEDIUM GLOSS): Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l)
House Paint Best Paint Co, Inc. Duracryl Semigloss 400 Interior Exterior Acrylic Latex 50 Best Paint Co, Inc. Microsol 2010 Satin Interior Latex 0 Best Paint Co, Inc. Mircosol 2000 Gloss Interior Latex Enamel 0

California Paint Fresh Coat Low odor Low VOC Acrylic Latex Semi-Gloss
w/ Microban 35

Dunn Edwards EcoShield Low Odor/ Zero VOC Interior Acrylic Semi
Gloss Paint 8

Dunn Edwards Sierra Low Odor "Zero VOC" Interior Acrylic Eggshell
Paint W540 10

Dunn Edwards Spartaglo Interior/Exterior Acrylic Semi Gloss Paint
W7500 100

Dunn Edwards Spartasheen Interior/Exterio r Acrylic Low Sheen Paint W

7300 95 Dunn Edwards Spartashell W7400 90 Earthpaint Inc. Clear Skies Wall Paint 42 Frazee 024 Speedsheen Semi Gloss In terior Vinyl Acrylic Finish 49

Frazee 032 Envirokote Semi Gloss Enamel 10

Frazee 128 Satin Glide II: Interior/Exterior Acrylic Semi Gloss
Finish 49

ICI Paint Devoe Paint Wonder-Hide Interior/Exterior Semi Gloss
Enamel DR537XX 48

ICI Paints Crown Coat Interior-Exterior Semi Gloss Enamel FOB

805-XX 74 ICI Paints Devoe Wonder Speed Semi Gloss Interior Latex Enamel 49

ICI Paints Dulux Advanced Oil Interior/Exterior Semi Gloss Wall &
Trim Enamel 1506 100
ICI Paints Interior Latex Semi Gloss Enamel FOB 215-XX 89

ICI Paints Lifemaster 2000 Interior Semi-Gloss 0

ICI Paints Mirrolac Speed Interior/Exterior Alkyd Semi Gloss Enamel

DP73XX 87

ICI Paints Ultra-Hide Durus Exterior Acrylic Semi Gloss Finish 2416-

XXXX 79

ICI Paints Wonder - Pure No VOC/Odor Interior Semigloss Wall &
Trim Paint 0
ICI Paints- Glidden America's Finest Interior Latex Semi Gloss 48

ICI Paints- Glidden Evermore Exterior Satin 45 Kelly Moore Paint Co., Inc. 1520 Enviro-Cote Interior Acrylic Semi Gloss Enamel 13

MAB Paints Enviro-Pure Latex Semi Gloss 0 Niagara Protective Coatings (NPC) W.B. Enamel 100 Old Masters/Diamond Vogel Paints Health Kote Interior Latex Semi-Gloss 0 Old Masters/Diamond Vogel Paints Pro Plus Interior Latex Gloss Enamel 60

PPG Pure Performance Interior Semi Gloss 0

Rodda Paint Horizon Low Gloss Interior Paint 533501 0

Rodda Paint Horizon Semi Gloss Interior Wall Paint 543501 0 Sherwin Williams Harmony Interior Latex Semi Gloss B 10 Series 0 Sico Shantung Interior Latex Paint 100% Acrylic- Design Finish 0

Southern Diversified Products LLC American Pride Paint 0

Southern Diversified Products LLC American Pr ide Paint Interior 100% Acrylic Semi-Gloss 0DRAFT ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings Compliant Product Lists

Compliant Product List.doc 17 21-May-07

NONFLAT (MEDIUM GLOSS): Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l)
Enamel Spectra Tone Eagle Odorless No VOC 0 Spectra Tone Gold Label Premium Enviro III 10 Vista Paint Corporation 1300 Coverall Production Semi Gloss 47 Vista Paint Corporation 6400 Carefree Earth Coat Semi-Gloss 8 Vista Paint Corporation 7500 Acriglo Eggshell White 39 Vista Paint Corporation 8400 Carefree Semi Gloss 44

Yolo Colorhouse Yolo Colorhouse Semi-Gloss Interior Wall Paint 533676 0

PRIMER, SEALER , UNDERCOATER: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) 3M Company Scotch Clad Concrete Primer 2271 50 3M Company Scotch Clad CP100 Conc rete and Interlaminar Primer 60 Ace Hardware Corporation Clear Latex Masonry Sealer 73 Ace Hardware Corporation Pro Line Latex Block Filler & Sealer 95 Benjamin Moore & Co. Eco Spec In terior Latex Primer Sealer 0 Benjamin Moore & Co. Latex Block Filler 17 Benjamin Moore & Co. Mo orcraft Super Cr aft Interior Latex Primer 63 Benjamin Moore & Co. Moorcraft Su per Craft Latex Block Filler* 53 Benjamin Moore & Co. Moorcraft Super Hide Latex Primer/Undercoater 67

Benjamin Moore & Co. Moorcraft Super Spec Latex En amel Undercoater & Primer
Sealer 75 Benjamin Moore & Co. Mo orcraft Super Spec Late x Exterior Primer 96 Benjamin Moore & Co. Pro Saver Plus Latex Primer 59 Benjamin Moore & Co. Regal First Coat 216 Interior Latex Primer & Underbody 91 Cal Western Paints, Inc. Acrylic Metal Primer-Universal 56 Cal Western Paints, Inc. Acrylic Primer Sealer Undercoater 47 Cal Western Paints, Inc. Hard Seal 3101 97 Cal Western Paints, Inc. HPV Dr ywall Primer Sealer 1018 54 Cal Western Paints, Inc. Safe Seal Interior 3104 65

Cloverdale Paint Premium Classic Latex Block Filler* 49

Columbia Paint & Coatings Hi-Performance Interior/Exterior Acrylic Latex Block Filler
05-055* 47 Conklin Company, Inc. Prime Time- Primer Coat for Acrylic Elastomeric Coating 36 Conklin Company, Inc. Show Kote Exterior Paint Primer 13 Conklin Company, Inc. Tack Coat- Emul sion Primer for Elastomeric Coating 39 Davlin Coatings, Inc. Butylseal 572 7 Degussa Building Systems Blockfiller 749 84 Degussa Building Systems Primer 1000 54 Degussa Building Systems Primer 150 25 Degussa Building Systems Thoroc IC2000 0

Dunn-Edwards Flex-Prime Flexible Crack-Resistant Primer W6315 73 Dunn-Edwards High Hide PVA Sealer 60

Dunn-Edwards Interior Latex Enamel Undercoater W2400 77

Dunn-Edwards Latex Wall Sealer W 2397 59DRAFT ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings Compliant Product Lists

Compliant Product List.doc 18 21-May-07

PRIMER, SEALER , UNDERCOATER: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Dunn-Edwards Special Masonry Primer 78 Dunn-Edwards Ultra-Grip Acrylic Multi-Purpose Primer W 715 42 Dunn-Edwards Vinylastic Interior Pigmented Sealer 60 Duron Bond –n- Seal Exterior Acrylic Latex Primer* 90 Duron Dura Crete Waterborne Acrylic Masonry Primer White* 45 Edoco Burkepoxy Primer 0 Everest Coatings Inc. Evercoat 100 General Purpose Primer 41 EVR-Gard Coatings Bond-Aid Pigmented Surface Conditioner 92 EVR-Gard Coatings Busan Vinyl Acrylic Wood and Metal Primer 76

EVR-Gard Coatings Enamel Undercoater Premium 100% Acrylic Enamel
Undercoater 76 EVR-Gard Coatings Evrcare Primer Sealer 0 EVR-Gard Coatings Evr-Seal PVA Sealer 55 EVR-Gard Coatings Quick Dry Latex Enamel Undercoat 61 EVR-Gard Coatings Spray & Fill Block Filler 51 Frazee Industries Acrylic Block Filler Interior/Exterior Block Filler* 80 Frazee Industries Acry-Prime Interi or/Exterior Acrylic Undercoater 88 Frazee Industries Aqua Seal Interior Wall Sealer & Enamel Undercoat 99 Frazee Industries Epotilt Exterior Epxoy Acrylic Concrete Sealer* 54 Frazee Industries Grip-N-Seal Interior/E xterior Acrylic All Purpose Primer 95 Frazee Industries High-Build Semi-G loss Primer, Fill and Finish 96

Frazee Industries Hi-Hide PVA Sealer 100

Frazee Industries Hi-Hide PVA S ealer: Interior Wall Sealer 98

Frazee Industries P K Primer 80 Frazee Industries Prep Step In terior Drywall Basecoat 90

Frazee Industries Prime+Plus Interior/Exterior Acrylic Primer/Sealer/Stain
Killer* 74 Frazee Industries Quick Prep In terior Drywall Basecoat 90

Frazee Industries Rollercoat Base Coat 12

Frazee Industries Shutter Undercoater 65 Frazee Industries Special Tiltup Prim er: Acrylic Concrete Sealer 53

Frazee Industries Water Reducible Black Fill Coat 92

Frazee Industries X-Terminator 2 Interior & Exterior Acrylic All-Purpose
Primer 97 Gaco Western, Inc. Gacoflex E-5481 0 Gaco Western, Inc. Gacoflex U-5677 Polyurethane Sealer 97 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) All-Pu rpose Stain Killer/Primer/Sealer 100 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Bloktex Heavy Duty Interior/Exterior Acrylic Block Filler 64

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Bloxfil 4000 Interior/Exterior Heavy Duty Acrylic Block
Filler* 64 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Hydrosealer-WB Waterborne Pigmented Bonding Coat 100

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Prep & Prime Bond-Prep Interior/Exterior Water-Based Pigmented Masonry Bonding Primer Sealer 100

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Prep & Prime Fill & Seal Equa lizing Interior Water-Based
Primer Sealer 75

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Prep & Prime Gripper Blocks urfacer Interior/Exterior
Water-Based Primer Sealer 82

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Prep & Prime Gripper Multi-Purpose Interior/Exterior
Water-Based Primer Sealer 100DRAFT ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings Compliant Product Lists

Compliant Product List.doc 19 21-May-07

PRIMER, SEALER , UNDERCOATER: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l)

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Prep & Prime High Build Fill & Seal Water Based Wall
Sealer 69

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Prep & Prime House 100% Ac rylic Water-Based Primer
Sealer 100 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Prep & Prime Od orless Interior Water Based Primer Sealer 3 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Prep & Prim e PVA Wall Interior Water Based Primer 100

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Prep & Prime Vapor Barrier In terior Water-Based Primer
Sealer 93 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Primer Interior Latex Primer Sealer 100 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Primz 220 Interior Latex Drywall Sealer 75 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Primz 220 Interior Latex PVA Wall Primer 100 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Primz 220 Interor/Exterior Latex Block Filler 61

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Primz 220 Kilstain WB Interi or/Exterior Latex All Purpose
Stain Killer/Primer/Sealer 100 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Pr imz 220 Latex New Drywall Primer 73 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Production Interior PVA Drywall Sealer 100 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Promaster Contractor Finish Latex PVA Primer-Sealer 100 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Pro- Tech Interior Latex Wall Primer 100 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) PVA Sealer Interior Pigmented Primer 36

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Ralph Lauren Paint Interior Deeptone Primer Sealer Premium Quality Acrylic Latex 84 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Speed Wall Interior Latex Primer Sealer 73

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Speed-Wall Interior PVA Latex Primer General Purpose
Primer 73 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Ultra-Hi de Interior/Exterior Latex Block Filler 61 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Ultra-Hide Interior/Exterior Latex Block Filler 61 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Wonder-P ure No VOC/Odor Interior Wall Primer 3 Hamilton Coatings Pro PVA 63 Hamilton Coatings PVA Sealer 45

Hirshfield's Paint Manufacturi ng Primemaster Primer/Sealer 40 Insl-x Products Corporation Corobond High Performance Acrylic Block Filler- White 44 International Coatings ICO Primer 0 Jones-Blair Co. Acrylic Latex Block Filler 59 Kelly-Moore Paint Co., Inc. Acry-Plex Inte rior PVA Primer/Sealer Low Odor Formula 25 Kelly-Moore Paint Co., Inc. Wall Prep Interior Latex Wallboard Surfacer 59 Kwal Paint #5940 Accu-Guard 100% Acrylic Block Filler* 61 Kwal Paint #5862 Cancel Embassy WB 100% Acrylic Primer* 54 MAB Paints, Incorporated Block Kote #1000* 100 Miller Paint Company 6015 Exterior Block Filler* 77 Multicolor Specialties, Inc. Speckle Effects Basecoat 93 Pacific Polymers Internationa l Elasto-Poxy Primer (WB) 0 ParexLahabra, Inc. Primer 310, Lahabra Primer 35 PPG Industries, Inc. Block Resistant Primer 95 PPG Industries, Inc. 67881 77 PPG Industries, Inc. Perma Crete Texture Coarse 54

PPG Industries, Inc. Perma-Crete Low Temperature Cure Concrete Block/Masonry Surfacer 60 PPG Industries, Inc. Pure Performan ce Primer Interior Latex Primer 0 PPG Industries, Inc. SpeedCraft Interior Latex Primer 77DRAFT ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings Compliant Product Lists

Compliant Product List.doc 20 21-May-07

PRIMER, SEALER , UNDERCOATER: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l)

PPG Industries, Inc. Speedhide Exterior House and Trim Wood Primer, Sealer,
Undercoater 89 PPG Industries, Inc. Speedhide Exte rior Latex Masonry Surface Sealer 61 PPG Industries, Inc. Speedhide High Build Interior Latex Primer/Sealer 90 PPG Industries, Inc. Speedhide Inte rior/Exterior Masonry Block Filler 20

PPG Industries, Inc. Sunproof Exterior House and Trim Primer, Sealer,
Undercoater Latex Primer 81 Rodda Paint Company SR Ultra Prime 72 Rodda Paint Company Interior/Exterior Latex Block Filler 33517* 83 Roman Decorating Products All Pro Sup-R-Prep 670 21 Roman Decorating Products All Pro Ultra-Prep 685 14 Roman Decorating Products Bite Clear Wall Size GH-09 95 Roman Decorating Products Golden Harvest EZ-Hang Primer GH-97 14 Roman Decorating Products Go lden Harvest White Bite 14 Roman Decorating Products Professional R-35, Heavy Duty Latex Primer Pro-935 21 Roman Decorating Products Roman Professional Ultraprime Pro-977 14 Roman Decorating Products Vinyl Prep Pro-909 95 Scotch Paint Corp Garage Door Primer G.D.P. 59 Scotch Paint Corp Latex Primer Undercoat Int/Ext 81 Scott Paint #402 Ultra 100% Acrylic Latex Block Filler* 75

Sherwin-Williams Co. A-100 Exterior Latex Wood Primer* 87 Sherwin-Williams Co. Conco Interior Acrylic Vapor Barrier Primer/Finish 60

Sherwin-Williams Co. Conco Interior Wa ter Base Drywall PVA Primer/Sealer 98 Sherwin-Williams Co. Dimensions Designer Colors Primer, Deep Color Undercoat 81

Sherwin-Williams Co. Do It Best Inte rior Latex Wall & Wood Primer 91 Sherwin-Williams Co. Dutch Boy Clarity Interior Latex Primer 5 Sherwin-Williams Co. Dutch Boy House & Trim Primer - Latex Exterior, White 91 Sherwin-Williams Co. Exterior Epoxy Masonry Tilt Primer, White 94 Sherwin-Williams Co. Harmony Interior Primer 5 Sherwin-Williams Co. Healthspec Low Odor Interior Latex Primer 6 Sherwin-Williams Co. Heavy Duty Block Filler 62

Sherwin-Williams Co. Interior Latex Primer* 88

Sherwin-Williams Co. Loxon Block Surfacer* 82 Sherwin-Williams Co. Loxon Masonry Coatings System Exterior Acrylic Primer 97 Sherwin-Williams Co. PrepRite 200 Interior Latex Primer 78 Sherwin-Williams Co. PrepRite 400 Interior Latex Wall Primer 63

Sherwin-Williams Co. PrepRite Bonding Primer Interior/Exterior Adhesion Promoting Primer 97 Sherwin-Williams Co. PrepRite Bonding Primer 42 Sherwin-Williams Co. PrepRite Classic Interior Latex Primer 91 Sherwin-Williams Co. PrepRite High Bu ild Interior Latex Primer/Surfacer 75 Sherwin-Williams Co. PrepRite Interior Acrylic Masonry Primer 90 Sherwin-Williams Co. PrepRite Interior/Exterior Block Filler 44 Sherwin-Williams Co. PrepRite ProBlock Interior/Exterior Latex Primer/Sealer* 73 Sherwin-Williams Co. Pro-Cryl Universal Acrylic Primer 89 Sherwin-Williams Co. Pro-Hide Silver Heavy Duty Latex Block Filler 62

Sherwin-Williams Co. Pro-Hide Gold Exterior Latex Primer 87

Sherwin-Williams Co. Proline Premium Exterior Latex Wood Primer 91

Sherwin-Williams Co. Proline Premium Interior Latex Wall Primer 63DRAFT ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings Compliant Product Lists

Compliant Product List.doc 21 21-May-07

PRIMER, SEALER , UNDERCOATER: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Sherwin-Williams Co. Promar High Holdout Interior Latex Primer 83

Sherwin-Williams Co. Sears Best Weatherbeater Exterior Latex Primer 91

Sherwin-Williams Co. Southwest Builders Hydro-Lac Quick Dry Latex
Undercoater 96

Sherwin-Williams Co. Southwest Builders Summit Exterior Acrylic Primer 41 Sherwin-Williams Co. Suprime '4' Interior Latex Wall Primer 87 Sherwin-Williams Co. Suprime Interior Latex Enamel Undercoater 91

Sherwin-Williams Co. T.P.S. Exterior Latex Primer 87

Sherwin-Williams Co. T.P.S. Interior Latex Wall Primer 88 Sherwin-Williams Co. T.P.S. Interior/Exterior Acrylic Latex Bonding Primer 42

Sherwin-Williams Co. Wasatch Hi Hide Interior Latex Primer 58 Sierra Corp. Elasta Block 78 Sierra Corp. Latex Primer/Undercoater 77 Southern Diversified Products, LLC American Pride Interior Latex Primer 0 Specialty Construction Brands, Inc. Masonry Sealer and Primer 12 Spectra-Tone Paint Corp. Gold La bel PVA Latex Primer Sealer 83 Spectra-Tone Paint Corp. Jobmaster "The Uniformer" Drywall Latex Primer 84 Spectra-Tone Paint Corp. Latex Block Fill* 73 Spectra-Tone Paint Corp. Masonry Primer 82 Spectra-Tone Paint Corp. No VOC Primer 8 SPM Thermoshield Inc. Thermoshield Acrylic Flex-Tac 50 Tamms Tamms Masonry Primer* <10 Textured Coatings of America Latex 1098Type Block Filler 73 Textured Coatings of America Super Cote Classic Primer 76 Tnemec Company Inc. CT Densifyer 0 Tnemec Company Inc. Epoxoprime LV 18 Tnemec Company Inc. Sub-Flex EP 8 True Value Manufacturing Interior Latex Primer PVA 95 United Coatings Manufacturing Co. Unibase 58 United States Gypsum Company Deco rative Interior Finish Sealer 0 United States Gypsum Company Sheetrock Primer 2 United States Gypsum Company Smoke Stop Acoustical Sealant 65 United States Gypsum Company USG Sheetrock Brand Tuff Hide 25 United States Gypsum Company USG Sheetrock Brand Wall Covering Primer 60 United States Gypsum Company Wallcovering Primer 2 Valspar Corporation 1st Step Interior Latex Primer 33 Valspar Corporation 1st Step New Construction Primer 91 Valspar Corporation American Tradition High Hide Primer 96 Valspar Corporation American Tradition Skidnot Primer 83 Valspar Corporation Colorplace Exterior Latex Primer 95 Valspar Corporation Colorplace Interior Latex Primer 33 Valspar Corporation Guardian Prof. Quality Exterior Latex Primer 95 Valspar Corporation Guardian Prof. Quality Interior Latex Primer 33 Valspar Corporation Guardian Prof. Quality New Construction Primer 91 Valspar Corporation Latex Interior Wall Primer 33 Valspar Corporation PR-14 WB Quik Prime 80 Valspar Corporation PR-7 Flex Prime 18 Valspar Corporation Prep Step Latex Stain Killer 75 Valspar Corporation Prep Step Wallboard Primer 33DRAFT ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings Compliant Product Lists

Compliant Product List.doc 22 21-May-07

PRIMER, SEALER , UNDERCOATER: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Valspar Corporation Prof. Qua lity Interior Latex Primer 33 Valspar Corporation Quik Hide Interior Latex Primer 33 Valspar Corporation Skid Resistant Primer 83 Vista Paint Corporation 100% Acrylic Block Filler 73 Vista Paint Corporation Acrylic Primer 78 Vista Paint Corporation Block Kote* 71 Vista Paint Corporation Carefree Earth Coat Primer 12 Vista Paint Corporation Seal Kote 66 Vista Paint Corporation Terminator II 48 Vista Paint Corporation Uniprep 24 Vista Paint Corporation Uniprime* 48

W.R. Grace & Co. - Conn. Perm a-A-Barrier WB Primer 9 Yenkin-Majestic Paint Corporation Lo ng Life Latex Drywall Primer 56 Zinsser Co., Inc. Guardz High Performance Sealer 95 Zinsser Co., Inc. Shieldz Universal Pre-Wallcovering Primer 73 Zinsser Co., Inc. Z-54 Heavy Duty Wallcovering Primer with Tack 73 Zinsser Co., Inc. Z-Prime II 5

ROOF: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 50 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Behr Process Corporation Roof Paint, White Reflective 48 Benjamin Moore & Co. Moorcraft Roof Spec Flat Finish 140 44 Cal Western Paints, Inc. Dynoflex Roof Patch Sealant 47 Cal Western Paints, Inc. Dynoseal Roof Primer 37 Conklin Company, Inc. Rapid Roof HV Top Coat- Acrylic Elastomeric Coating 34 Davlin Coatings, Inc. Acrylastic 510 6 Dow Corning Corporation Allguard Roof Coating - Pastel Tint Base 23 Elastomeric Roofing Systems, Inc Erlastibase 19 Everest Coatings Inc. Ever coat 500/510 Elastomeric 100% Acrylic Roof Coating 26 Everest Coatings Inc. Evercoat 700 Bleed Resistant 100% Acrylic Roof Coating 42 EVR-Gard Coatings Texdura 25 Gaco Western, Inc. A30 41 Gaco Western, Inc. A3611 41 Gaco Western, Inc. UB8380 0 Gardner-Gibson BlackJack Elastomeric Roof Coating 41 Gardner-Gibson Sta Kool Elastomeric Roof Coating 41 Gardner-Gibson APOC Elastomeric Coating 40

Gardner-Gibson APOC White Elastomeric Roof Patch 12

Gardner-Gibson Solar Guard White Premium Elastomeric 41

Gardner-Gibson Solar Guard Brushable White Elastomeric 12 Garland Company Pyramic 0 Henry Company Water Based Latex Low VOC, RTC 583 2 Henry Company Water Based Latex, White Elastomeric Coating 44 Insulating Coatings Corporation ASTEC 4000 Surface Conditioner 0 Jones-Blair Co. Elastacryl FR Roof Coating White 27DRAFT ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings Compliant Product Lists

Compliant Product List.doc 23 21-May-07

ROOF: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 50 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Jones-Blair Co. Elastacryl FR,QS White 40 Jones-Blair Co. Elastacryl Roof Coating White 27 LaPolla Industries, Inc. Therm- O-Flex Original (TF 750) 34 Life Paint Company Stretch-Guard Roof Coating 47 Pacific Polymers International Elasto-Tex Roof-Coat 23 Rust-Oleum Corp. Roof Coating 4 Sherwin-Williams Co. KST Coatings 17421 24 Sherwin-Williams Co. KST Coatings White Elastomeric Roof Coating 45

Southwestern Petroleum Corporation SWEPCO White Acrylic Coating 0

Tremco Incorporated High Build Reflective Coating 34 Tremco Incorporated Polyur ea Roofing Coating System 10

Tropical Asphalt, LLC Tropical Asphalt Eternalastic White Elastomeric Coating
A/F 26

United Coatings Manufacturing Co. Acron 60 8 United Coatings Manufacturing Co. Diathon Pearl White 10 United Coatings Manufacturing Co. Roof Mate White 5 United Coatings Manufacturing Co. Sunshield 9

RUST PREVENTATIVE: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 250 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Acrymax Technologies PC-125 48 Aervoe Industries, Inc Rustproof WaterBased Paint 219 Benjamin Moore & Co. M28 DTM Acrylic Gloss Enamel 206 Benjamin Moore & Co. M29 DTM Acrylic Semi-Gloss Enamel 207 Cloverdale Ecologic DTM 198 Cloverdale Ecologic Rustex Primer 103 Everest Coatings Primer 110 105

Frazee 540 DTM Industrial Maintenance Gloss 150 Frazee 561 Acrylic Metal Primer 145 Lapolla Coatings RCS-30 DTM Acrylic Primer 150 Life Paint Company 100% Acrylic Gloss DTM 197 MAB Paints Hydro Primer Acrylic DTM Maintenance Primer 100 MAB Paints Rust-O-Lastic Gloss Acrylic DTM Maintenance Finish 220

MAB Paints Rust-O-Lastic Low Sheen Acrylic DTM Maintenance
Finish 220 Pittsburg Paints 97-145 Pitt Guard Direct To Rust Epoxy Mastic Coating 128 PPG Industries, Inc. 97-145 Pitt Guard DTR 128

Rustoleum 7900 American Accents 133 Rust-Oleum Corp. 5200 DTM Acrylic 222 Rust-Oleum Corp. 5200 DTM Acrylic Primer 242 Sherwin-Williams Co. DTM Acrylic Gloss Coating (Waterborne) 150 Sherwin-Williams Co. DTM Acrylic Primer Finish 150 Spectra Tone 81 Latex Metal Primer 94 Spectra-Tone Paint Corp. DTM Gloss Acrylic 129

Vista 4800 Metal Pro Primer 96DRAFT ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings Compliant Product Lists

Compliant Product List.doc 24 21-May-07

SPECIALTY PRIM ER, SEALER, UNDERCOATER: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) American Formulating and Manufacturing SafeCoat Transitional Primer 9

American Paints Terminator 2 Water-Based Stain Killer Interior Exterior
Primer/Sealer* 45 Benjamin Moore & Co. Moorcraft Super Spec Busan 100% Acrylic Exterior Prime* 54 Benjamin Moore & Co. BM Fresh Start All-Purpose 100% Acrylic Primer 66 Best Paint Company Best Universal Primer 89 Cal Western Paints, Inc. Stain Stopper & Transitional Primer 10 Finnaren & Haley Inc. Weather Barrier 1850 Masonry Conditioner/Bonding Sealer 0

Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Glidden Prime Interiors 100% Acrylic Latex Multi-Purpose
Stainkiller Primer/Sealer 40 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Prep & Prime Stain Jammer Interior Water Based Primer 40 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Ultra-Hide Aq uacrylic Gripper Stain Killer Primer-Sealer 100 Life Paint Company Acrylic Stain Blocking Busan Primer 90 Miller Paint Company 6060 All Purpose Stain Blocking Primer* 61

PPG Industries, Inc. Seal Grip Interior/Exterior 100% Acrylic Universal
Primer/Sealer 96

Sherwin-Williams Co. Do It Best Interior Latex Stain Block Primer 97
Sherwin-Williams Co. Dura-Kote 100% Ac rylic Interior/Exterior Primer 42 Sherwin-Williams Co. Interior Latex Stain Blocking Primer 91

Sherwin-Williams Co. Interior/Exterior Latex Primer StainBlocker 97 Specialty Construction Brands, In c. Foster Waterbase Primer 56 United Coatings Manufacturing Co. Acrylex 400 66 Valspar Corporation 1st Step Latex Stain Block 75 Valspar Corporation Prep Step Latex Stain Killer 75

TRAFFIC MARKING: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Ace Hardware Corporation Industrial Maintenance Latex Zone Marking Paint 99 Aexcel Corporation Fast Dry Waterborne Traffic Marking Paint 97 Aexcel Corporation Jet Dry Waterborne Traffic Marking Paint 80 Aexcel Corporation Methyl Meth acrylate Traffic Marking Paint 9 Aexcel Corporation Regular Dry Waterborne Traffic Marking Paint 92 Aexcel Corporation Waterborne Traffic Marking Paint 84 Dunn-Edwards Vin-L-Stripe 57 Ennis Paint Inc. Waterborne Traffic and Parking Paint 96 EVR-Gard Coatings Traffic Paint White 100% Acrylic Resin 87 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Traffic Paint Water Reducible Acrylic 100 Jones-Blair Co. Latex Zone Marking Yellow 97 Kelly-Moore Paint Co., Inc. Mark Right Latex Marking Paint 37 Life Paint Company Traffic Marking Paint 64 Pervo Paint Company Traffic Paint, Hi-Performance WB, Rapid Dry 72 Pervo Paint Company PervoPlastic 6050 Series 96DRAFT ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings Compliant Product Lists

Compliant Product List.doc 25 21-May-07

TRAFFIC MARKING: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 100 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Pervo Paint Company PervoStripe 6000 Series 72 Pride Paint Company Latex Traffic Paint 90 Rust-Oleum Corp. Traffic Striping Paint 2500 Series 89 Rust-Oleum Corp. Traffic Zone Striping Paint 2300 Series 74

Sherwin-Williams Co. Interior/Exterior Flat Acrylic Water Base Traffic Marking Paint, White 83

Sherwin-Williams Co. Pro-Hide Silver Quic k Dry Waterborne Traffic Paint, White 91 Sherwin-Williams Co. Setfast Acrylic La tex Traffic Marking Paint, White 97 Sherwin-Williams Co. Setfast Low VOC Acrylic Traffic Marking Paint, White 90 Simpson Coatings Group, Inc. Jet Dr y Lead Free Traffic Marking Paint 72 Spectra-Tone Paint Corp. Acrylic Traffic Paint 89 ThorWorks Industries, Inc. SealMaster Fast Dry HD 87 ThorWorks Industries, Inc. SealMaster Line Block Out 69 ThorWorks Industries, Inc. SportMaster Line Paint 69 TMT Pathway Water Based Traffic Coating 96 Vista Paint Corporation On-Line Se mi-Gloss Traffic Marking Paint 45 Vista Paint Corporation On-Line Fast Dry Traffic Marking Paint 90

WATERPROOFING MEMBRANE: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 250 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) American Polymers Corporation DBA Polycoat Products Polyco at - Aquaseal 5000 194 Epro Services, Inc. Ecobase II Waterproofing Membrane 10 Epro Services, Inc. Ecobase Waterproofing Membrane 9 Epro Services, Inc. Ecoline R Liquid Applied Membrane 14 Epro Services, Inc. Ecoline S Spray Applied Membrane 8 Jones-Blair Co. Neogard Perma-Gard III 124 Pacific Polymers Interna tional Elasto-Deck BT 184 TEC Specialty Construction Brands, Inc. HydraFlex Waterproofing Crack Isolation Membrane 13 Tremco Incorporated Tremproof 150 and Thermastic 150 44 Tremco Incorporated Tremproof 201L 185 Tremco Incorporated Tremproof 201T 156 Tremco Incorporated Tremproof 250 GC SL 123 Tremco Incorporated Tremproof 60R 192 Tremco Incorporated Tremproof 60V 101 Tremco Incorporated Vulkem 250 GC-R 144

W.R. Grace & Co. - Conn. Bituthen e Deck Prep Surface Treatment 10

W.R. Grace & Co. - Conn. Procor Flui d Applied Waterproofing Membrane 75DRAFT ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings Compliant Product Lists

Compliant Product List.doc 26 21-May-07

WOOD COATINGS - CLEAR: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 275 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Akzo Nobel Coatings Synteko Sealmaster 248 Basic Coatings, Inc. Hydroline Wood Floor Sealer 181 Behr Process Corporation Premium Weatherproofing Wood Finish 247 BonaKemi USA, Inc. Bona BonaSeal 91 BonaKemi USA, Inc. Bona Eon 70 109 BonaKemi USA, Inc. Bona Mega 196 BonaKemi USA, Inc. Bona Traffic 228 Cal Western Paints, Inc. Acry licad Clear Wood Finish 251 Cal Western Paints, Inc. Acryvar Clear Acrylic 275 Cal Western Paints, Inc. Naturals Clear Wood Finish 201

Frazee Industries Clear Waterborne 66

Frazee Industries Interior Water Reducible Clear Sealer 243 Frazee Industries Waterborne Clear Satin Lacquer 253 Frazee Industries Waterborne Clear Semigloss Lacquer 245 Frazee Industries Waterborne Flat Lacquer Clear 241 Frazee Industries Waterborne Gloss Lacquer 250 Frazee Industries Waterborne High Solids Clear Gloss Lacquer 250

Frazee Industries Waterborne Skateboard Clear 207 Gemini Coatings, Inc. High Solids Waterborne 231 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Penchrome Interior Waterborne Aquaacrylic 196 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Penchrome Interior Waterborne Satin Clear 177 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Wood Pride Waterborne Gloss Varnish Clear 196 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Wood Pride Waterborne Varnish Satin Clear 177 Hillyard Industries, Inc. Courtguard 219 Hillyard Industries, Inc. Tip Off 203

Hirshfield's Paint Manufacturi ng Ultra Clear/Clear Coat 135 Kelly-Moore Paint Co., Inc. Kel Aqua Sanding Sealer 231 Kelly-Moore Paint Co., Inc. Kel-Aqua Clear Wood Finish 179 Kelly-Moore Paint Co., Inc. Kel-Thane II Waterborne Interior Clear Finish 168 Life Paint Company Polyurethane 171 Multicolor Specialties, Inc. Multipurpose Clear Topcoat 230 Perma-Chink Systems, Inc. Acrylic Gloss 221 Perma-Chink Systems, Inc. Acrylic Satin 218 Perma-Chink Systems, Inc. Lifeline Advance 248 Perma-Chink Systems, Inc. Lifeline XL 234 Perma-Chink Systems, Inc. SureShine 251 Pioneer Eclipse Corporation Woodstar Wood Floor Finish 269 PPG Industries, Inc. Gloss Waterborne Polyurethane 235 PPG Industries, Inc. Olympic Water Based Sanding Sealer 234 PPG Industries, Inc. Waterborne Polyurethane 235 PPG Industries, Inc. WaterGuard Wood Sealant – Water Base 168 R.J. McGlennon Co. Inc. Aqualac Waterb orne Precatalyzed Clear Topcoats 263 Rudd Company Hycril Waterbase Lacquer 232 Rudd Company PPI Self Seal-Waterbase 264 Rust-Oleum Corp. Floor Finish 254 Rust-Oleum Corp. Interior Urethane Waterborne 192 Rust-Oleum Corp. Outdoor Spar Urethane 235

Samuel Cabot Inc. Cabothane 166 Samuel Cabot Inc. Timberjack Gloss 253DRAFT ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings Compliant Product Lists

Compliant Product List.doc 27 21-May-07

WOOD COATINGS - CLEAR: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 275 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Sherwin-Williams Co. Acrylic Latex Varnish, Dull 167 Sherwin-Williams Co. Acrylic Latex Varnish, Gloss 175

Sherwin-Williams Co. Dimensions Décor Clear Gloss 175 Sherwin-Williams Co. Minwax Polycrylic 1G Satin 264

Sherwin-Williams Co. Minwax Water-Based Po lyurethane For Floors, Semi-Gloss 242 Sherwin-Williams Co. Thompson’s Water Seal Advanced Natural Wood Protector 243

Sherwin-Williams Co. Thompson’s Water Seal Waterproofer Plus Clear Wood

Protector 265 Simpson Coatings Group, Inc. ESL Sanding Sealer 229 Simpson Coatings Group, Inc. Gloss ESL Lacquer 230 Simpson Coatings Group, Inc. Satin ESL Lacquer 232 Simpson Coatings Group, Inc. Semi-Gloss ESL Lacquer 225 Spectra-Tone Paint Corp. Acrylic Clear 177 Spectra-Tone Paint Corp. Spectra Lac Clear 253 Spectra-Tone Paint Corp. Spect ra Lac Sanding Sealer 272 Trinity Coatings Co. 275 VOC Hi Build Gloss Lacquer 272 Trinity Coatings Co. 275 VOC Hi Build Satin Topcoat 267 Trinity Coatings Co. 275 VOC Hi Build Sealer 272 Trinity Coatings Co. 275 VOC Vinyl Sealer 273 Trinity Coatings Co. 275 VOC Water White Clear Gloss 272 Trinity Coatings Co. 275 VOC Water White Sealer 272 Trinity Coatings Co. Aqualac Clear Gloss Lacquer 252 Trinity Coatings Co. Aqualac Clear Sanding Sealer 271 Trinity Coatings Co. Aqualac Lacquer Sanding Sealer 230 Trinity Coatings Co. Clear Gloss Waterborne Lacquer 270 Trinity Coatings Co. Clear Waterborne Acrylic Urethane 244 Trinity Coatings Co. Waterborne Clear Lacquer 201 Trinity Coatings Co. Waterborne Clear Sanding Sealer 195 Trinity Coatings Co. Waterborne Gloss Lacquer 246 Valspar Corporation Decorative E ffects Clear Protector Gloss 245 Valspar Corporation Decorative E ffects Clear Protector Satin 240 Valspar Corporation Enviro + Plus Water Based Clear Topcoat, 60 Sheen 273 Valspar Corporation McCloskey Clear Coat Latex Gloss 245 Valspar Corporation McCloskey Clear Coat Latex Satin 240 Valspar Corporation McCloskey Heirloom Crystal Clear Poly Gloss 258 Valspar Corporation McCloskey Heirloom Crystal Clear Poly Satin 257 Valspar Corporation McCloskey Waterbase Poly Gloss 247 Valspar Corporation McCloskey Waterbase Poly Satin 248 Valspar Corporation McCloskey Waterbase Poly Semi Gloss 246 Valspar Corporation Valspar Waterbase Poly Gloss 247 Valspar Corporation Valspar Waterbase Poly Satin 248 Vanex, Inc. Break-Through Gloss Clear 249 Vanex, Inc. Break-Through Satin Clear 246 Vanex, Inc. Clear Advantage Gloss 222 Vanex, Inc. Clear Advantage Sanding Sealer 203 Vanex, Inc. Clear Advantage Satin 231 Vista Paint Corporation W/B High Gloss Wood Lacquer 226 Zinsser Co., Inc. Pro Finisher Waterborne Sanding Sealer 273 Zinsser Co., Inc. Pro Finisher WB Polyurethane 214DRAFT ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings Compliant Product Lists

Compliant Product List.doc 28 21-May-07

WOOD COATINGS - CLEAR: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 275 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Zinsser Co., Inc. Wolman RainCoat Clear Water Repellent Water-Base 265 Zinsser Co., Inc. VOC Pro Finisher Clear Lacquer Gloss 275

WOOD COATINGS - OPAQUE: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 275 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l)
Frazee Industries 566 Waterbor ne Lacquer Undercoater 48

Frazee Industries 560 Waterbor ne Lacquer Undercoater 92 Gemini Coatings, Inc. High Solids Waterborne Lacquer 231 R.J. McGlennon Co. Inc. Aqualac Waterborne Lacquer Color Topcoats 225 Simpson Coatings Group, Inc. Satin Black ESL 157 Trinity Coatings Co. Aqualac White Undercoater Waterborne Lacquer 212 Trinity Coatings Co. Aqualac White Waterborne Lacquer 233 Trinity Coatings Co. Nitro Waterborne White Lacquer Undercoater 195 Trinity Coatings Co. Waterborne Black Lacquer 223 Trinity Coatings Co. Waterborne Quick Dry Lacquer 203 Trinity Coatings Co. Waterborne Terracotta Lacquer 228 Trinity Coatings Co. White Lacquer Undercoat 274 Trinity Coatings Co. White Waterborne Lacquer 218 Valspar Corporation Enviro + Plus Water Based White Topcoat, 20 Sheen 227 Valspar Corporation Enviro + Plus Water Based White Undercoat 195 Valspar Corporation White Undercoat - XLO - 200 VOC 197 Vista Paint Corporation Aqua Lac Undercoat 144

ZINC-RICH PRIMER: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 340 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Carboline Company Carboline 858 257 Carboline Company Carbozinc 11 WB 0 Carboline Company Carbozinc 621 336 Carboline Company Carbozinc 859 328 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Catha-Coat 302HA Reinforced Inorganic Zinc Primer 295 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Catha-Coat 302V 246 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Catha-Coat 304V Ethyl Silicate Inorganic Zinc Coating 311 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Catha-Coat 305 Water Based Inorganic Zinc Coating 0 Glidden Company (dba: ICI Paints) Catha-Coat 316 Organic Zinc Rich Primer 241 Jones-Blair Co. Chem-O-Z HS2 Organic Zinc Rich Primer 236

Sherwin-Williams Co. Corothane I Galva Pac One Pack Zinc Primer 299

Sherwin-Williams Co. Fast-Clad Zinc HS Reinforced Zinc Primer 321 Sherwin-Williams Co. Zinc Clad II Plus Inorganic Zinc-Rich Coating 313 Sherwin-Williams Co. Zinc Clad VI Zinc Rich Epoxy 122 Sherwin-Williams Co. Zinc Clad XI Water Based Inorganic Zinc Silicate Coating 25 Sigma Coatings USA B.V. Sigma Tornusil MC 58 II 141DRAFT ARB Suggested Control Measure for Architect ural Coatings Compliant Product Lists

Compliant Product List.doc 29 21-May-07

ZINC-RICH PRIMER: Products That Comply with SCM Draft Proposed VOC Limit – 340 g/l

Manufacturer or Parent Company Product Name VOC Reg. (g/l) Sigma Coatings USA B.V. Sigmacover Zinc Primer II 314 Tnemec Company Inc. Hydro-Zinc Series 91-H2O 317 Tnemec Company Inc. Perimeprime Series 394 330 Tnemec Company Inc. Purp le Prime Series 1 330 Tnemec Company Inc. Tneme- Zinc Series 90-97 321 Valspar Corporation Valspar Zinc Dust Primer 40