alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM " THE
     CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS"  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           3,383
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   100
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     49,943
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           1,402
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             1,376
<LOANS>                                        117,881
<ALLOWANCE>                                        376
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 179,132
<DEPOSITS>                                     107,727
<SHORT-TERM>                                    33,750
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,659
<LONG-TERM>                                      6,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,570
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,426
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 179,132
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,153
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  936
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,089
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,582
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,507
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       25
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    898
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    666
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         666
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       402
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.51
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   351
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  376
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            376



</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSpace Station Workshop: Commercial Missions and User RequirementsThe topics of discussion addressed during a three day workshop on commercial application in space are presented. Approximately half of the program was directed towards an overview and orientation to the Space Station Project; the technical attributes of space; and present and future potential commercial opportunities. The remaining time was spent addressing technological issues presented by previously-formed industry working groups, who attempted to identify the technology needs, problems or issues faced and/or anticipated by the following industries: extraction (mining, agriculture, petroleum, fishing, etc.); fabrication (manufacturing, automotive, aircraft, chemical, pharmaceutical and electronics); and services (communications, transportation and retail robotics). After the industry groups presented their technology issues, the workshop divided into smaller discussion groups composed of: space experts from NASA; academia; industry experts in the appropriate disciplines; and other workshop participants. The needs identified by the industry working groups, space station technical requirements, proposed commercial ventures and other issues related to space commercialization were discussed. The material summarized and reported are the consensus from the discussion groups.Document ID19900013112Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference ProceedingsDate AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 23, 1988Subject CategoryAdministration And ManagementReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:102912NASA-TM-102912Accession Number90N22428Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900013112.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Report of Hans Hartenstein

On North Dakota Department of Health’s April 10, 20 10

BACT Determination for Minnkota’s M.R. Young Statio n

April 2010

(CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT)
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of2 

AUG 2 0 2010 

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 


PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS 


BRANCH 
 As of: August 20, 2010 

Received: August 09, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 20, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2cb7b 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-001O-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-201O-0010-0192 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: Debra L Brown 

Address: 

Montverde, FL, 34756 

Email: debfca@aol.com 

General Comment 

August 9, 2010 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status 

as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-2010­

0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these 

https:/ Ifdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency IcomponentisubmitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/20/2010 
Page 2 of2 

regulations. Thank you for your fair consideration. 

Debra L. Brown 

https:llfdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency1componentlsubmitter InfoCover Page?Call=... 8/20/2010
From: johnny007 [mailto:johnnybag@comcast.net] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 3:53 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 in the subject line of the message

Oh Yes, by all means create another pot of money you can steal from. Do you 

people ever quit. Noone needs you to come up with a foolish Treasury bond 

forced plan. You'll take 1.00 today and pay back .25 cents worth of buying power. 

Now, If you tie the returns to a commodity index, I am all for it, but not for a 3 

percent return in 25% inflation. Anyone there have a clue on monetary policy or 

do you just look for the next Ponzi Scheme to create?
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-60495, 333-107873, 333-104253 and 333-104252) and Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-39554, 333-57501, 333-70229, 333-86037 and 333-86153) of Alpharma, Inc. of our report dated March 31, 2005, except for the restatement discussed in Note 2b (not presented herein) to the consolidated financial statements appearing under Item 15 of the Company's 2004 annual report on Form 10-K/A, as to which the date is May 5, 2005 and for the effects of discontinued operations discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, as to which the date is March 16, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements which appears in this Form 10-K.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
#### Cora Reinertsen, as Executrix of Michael Reinertsen, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*Erie Railroad Company, Respondent.

*Reinertsen*v. *Brie R. R. Co.,*142 App. Div. 31, affirmed.

(Argued March 6, 1912;

decided March 26, 1912.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered *542January 27, 1911, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and granting a new trial in an action originally brought by plaintiff’s testator to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by him through the negligence of defendant, his employer.

*George F. Hickey*and *M.*P. *O’Connor*for appellant.

*Frederic B. Jennings*and *William C. Cannon*for respondent.

Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hisoock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
EXHIBIT 25

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         Each person whose signature  appears below hereby  authorizes D. Vernon
Horton or Clayton C. Larson, and either of them, as attorney-in-fact, to sign in
his or her behalf,  individually  and in each capacity stated below, and to file
this Annual Report on Form 10-K and all  amendments  and/or  supplements to this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/S/ Clayton C. Larson
--------------------------------------    Date:              March 27, 1996
Charles E. Bancroft,
Director


/S/ Dennis A. DeCius
--------------------------------------    Date:              March 27, 1996
Dennis A. DeCius
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer and
principal accounting officer)


/S/ Gene DiCicco
--------------------------------------    Date:              March 25, 1996
Gene DiCicco,
Director


/S/ Lewis L. Fenton
--------------------------------------    Date:              March 13, 1996
Lewis L. Fenton,
Director


/S/ Gerald T. Fry
--------------------------------------    Date:              March 13, 1996
Gerald T. Fry,
Director



<PAGE>

/S/ James L. Gattis
--------------------------------------    Date:              March 27, 1996
James L. Gattis,
Director and Secretary


/S/ Hubert W. Hudson
--------------------------------------    Date:              March 21, 1996
Hubert W. Hudson,
Director


/S/ Stanley R. Haynes
--------------------------------------    Date:              March 27, 1996
Stanley R. Haynes,
Chairman of the Board
and Director


/S/ D. Vernon Horton
--------------------------------------    Date:              March 27, 1996
D. Vernon Horton,
Chief Executive officer
(principal executive
officer) and Director


/S/ William J. Keller
--------------------------------------    Date:              March 27, 1996
William J. Keller,
Director


/S/ Clayton C. Larson
--------------------------------------    Date:              March 13, 1996
Clayton C. Larson,
President and Director


/S/ William S. McAfee
--------------------------------------    Date:              March 27, 1996
William S. McAfee,
Director


<PAGE>
/S/ William H. Pope
--------------------------------------    Date:              March 27, 1996
William H. Pope,
Director


/S/ William K. Sambrailo
--------------------------------------    Date:              March 22, 1996
William K. Sambrailo,
Director


/S/ Robert B. Sheppard
--------------------------------------    Date:              March 14, 1996
Robert B. Sheppard,
Director


/S/ Clyn Smith, Jr.
--------------------------------------    Date:              March 14, 1996
Clyn Smith, Jr.,
Director
#### W. HAYWARD EXPORT CO. v. LEE.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

February 20, 1912.)

No. 2,294.

1. Chattel Mortgages (§ 133*) — Nature—Specific Dien.

Tinder Gen. St. Fla. 190(5, § 2495, a chattel mortgage is only a specific lien oil the property covered.

[Ed Note. — For other eases, see Chattel Mortgages, Cent. Dig. § 219: Doc. Dig. § 133.*]

2. Chattel Mortgages (§ 124*) — Property Xot in Existence.

Where a Florida chattel mortgage covers personal property not existing at the lime it was executed, but to be thereafter created or manufactured, the lien only attaches, when the property actually conies into existence.

[Ed. Xote. — For other cases, see Chattel Mortgages, Doc. Dig. § 124.*]

*6488. *Loas*and Logging (§ 26*) — Wages—Lien.

Under Rev. St. Fla. 1892, § 1732 (Gen. St. Fla. 1906, § 2198), providing a lién for wages due laborers, tbe bookkeeper of a sawmill has a lien for wages on the lumber produced by the mill, which attaches as soon as the process of manufacture commences, and is not affected by failure to complete such manufacture.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Logs and Logging, Dec. Dig. § 26.*]

Petition to Superintend and Revise an Order of the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Florida.

Petition by the W. Hayward Export Company against William F. Lee.

Denied.

For opinion below, see 190 Fed. 97.

Francis B. Carter (W. A. Blount and A. C. Blount, Jr., of counsel), for petitioner.

Pattillo Campbell, for respondent.

Before PARDEE, McCORMICK, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dee. *&*Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Itep’r Indexes

PER CURIAM.

[1] In Florida a mortgage is only a specific lien. G. S. Fla. 1906, § 2495.

5[2] Where a mortgage covers personal property not in existence at the time, but to be thereafter created or manufactured, the lien only attaches when the property is actually created or manufactured.

[3] Under section 1732, R. S. Fla. 1892, and section 2198, G. S. Fla. 1906, the bookkeeper of a sawmill has a lien for his wages on' the lumber produced by such mill. National Bank of San Augustine v. Kirkby et al., 43 Fla.' 386, 32 South. 881. This lien necessarily attaches as soon as the process of manufacture commences, and whether the manufacture is completed or not does not affect the existence and validity of the lien.

The judgment of the District Court, overruling a demurrer of petitioner to the amended petitions of William F. Lee, was proper and right in the matter, and the petition for revision herein is denied.
Docket: EBSA-2010-0014 

Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status as a 

Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0014-0001 

Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status as a 

Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: EBSA-2010-0014-DRAFT-0004 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: Kevin C Curry 

Address: 

12129 Lake Estates Avenue 

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United Kingdom, 70810 

Email: kevinccurry@cox.net 

Phone: 225-757-8559 

General Comment 

My insurer believes that if I choose to drop maternity coverage on my high deductible individual 

plan, then I will lose grandfathered status. If this is correct, then this is unfair. 

I, as the insured patient, should be able to reduce coverage under my individual policy without 

losing grandfathered status. I no longer need maternity coverage and would like to reduce my 

premiums. If I lose grandfathered status, my premiums might increase. 

Please clarify in the regs that the insured/patient of an individual policy can change coverages 

like this without losing grandfatherered status. This should be treated differentlt from a plan or 

insuranance company imposing this change upon patients/insureds. 

Thanks. 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION 

As of: July 21, 2010 

Received: July 19, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80b1cc4f 

Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 7/21/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-40938

Summary Calendar

COURTLAND LINDSAY,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

SMITH COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,

Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:14-CV-641

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:*

The district court dismissed Courtland Dewayne Lindsay’s amended 

complaint for failure to provide a short and plain statement either of the 

grounds for federal jurisdiction or of his claims for relief. See FED. R. CIV. P.

8(a). Lindsay’s largely unintelligible brief on appeal fails to cure these 

deficiencies. Accordingly, his outstanding motions are DENIED, and his 

appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous pursuant to Fifth Circuit Rule 42.2. See 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 9, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-40938 Document: 00513110792 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/09/2015
No. 14-40938

2

Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.24 (5th Cir. 1997). Lindsay is 

CAUTIONED that future frivolous or repetitive filings will result in the 

imposition of sanctions, including dismissal, monetary sanctions, and 

restrictions on his ability to file pleadings in this court or any court subject to 

this court’s jurisdiction. He is further CAUTIONED to review all pending 

matters in this court and move to dismiss any that are frivolous or repetitive.

 Case: 14-40938 Document: 00513110792 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/09/2015
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsQualification of the RSRM case membrane case-to-insulation bondline inspection using the Thiokol Corporation ultrasonic RSRM bondline inspection systemQualification testing of Combustion Engineering's AMDATA Intraspect/98 Data Acquisition and Imaging System that applies to the redesigned solid rocket motor (RSRM) case membrane case-to-insulation bondline inspection was performed. Testing was performed at M-67, the Thiokol Corp. RSRM Assembly Facility. The purpose of the inspection was to verify the integrity of the case membrane case-to-insulation bondline. The case membrane scanner was calibrated on the redesigned solid rocket motor case segment calibration standard, which had an intentional 1.0 by 1.0 in. case-to-insulation unbond. The case membrane scanner was then used to scan a 20 by 20 in. membrane area of the case segment. Calibration of the scanner was then rechecked on the calibration standard to ensure that the calibration settings did not change during the case membrane scan. This procedure was successfully performed five times to qualify the unbond detection capability of the case membrane scanner.Document ID19900013286Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsCook, M.*(Thiokol Corp. Brigham City, UT, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 8, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1990Subject CategorySpacecraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:183940TWR-18898NASA-CR-183940Accession Number90N22602Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-30490Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900013286.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024