alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Participant List 

US EPA Listening Session on Greenhouse Gas Standards for Utilities and Petroleum Refineries 

Session with Coalition Groups 

February 23, 2011 

FIRST LAST TITLE ORGANIZATION 

Randy Armstrong Environmental Issues Director Shell 

Vicki Arroyo Executive Director 

Georgetown Climate Center, 

Georgetown Law 

Chuck Barlow 

Assistant General Counsel - 

Environmental Entergy Services 

Nicholas Bianco Senior Associate World Resources Institute 

Bill Bumpers Environmental Partner Baker Botts LLP 

Kyle Danish Member Van Ness Feldman, P.C. 

Dick Munson 

Senior Vice President of Government 

Affairs Recycled Energy Development 

Tim Profeta Director 

Nicholas Institute for 

Environmental Policy Solutions, 

Duke University 

Manik Roy 

Vice President for Federal Government 

Outreach 

Pew Center on Global Climate 

Change 

Jared Snyder 

Assistant Commissioner, Air Resources, 

Climate Change and Energy 

New York State Department of 

Environmental Conservation 

David Thornton Assistant Commissioner 

Minnesota Pollution Control 

Agency 

Brian Turner 

Deputy Director, Washington, DC - 

Office of Jerry Brown and Assistant 

Executive Officer for Federal Climate 

Policy California Air Resources Board 

Bill Tyndall Senior Vice President Duke Energy 

Greg Wannier Deputy Director 

Center for Climate Change Law, 

Columbia University 

Robert Wyman Partner Latham & Watkins LLP
§ 6.19 Net worth exhibit. ( a ) Each applicant except a qualified tax-exempt organization or cooperative association must provide with its application a detailed exhibit showing the net worth of the applicant and any affiliates (as defined in this part) when the proceeding was designated. If any individual, corporation, or other entity directly or indirectly controls or owns a majority of the voting shares or other interest of the applicant, or if the applicant directly or indirectly owns or controls a majority of the voting shares or other interest of any corporation or other entity, the exhibit must include a showing of the net worth of all such affiliates or of the applicant including the affiliates. The exhibit may be in any form convenient to the applicant that provides full disclosure of the applicant's and its affiliates' assets and liabilities and is sufficient to determine whether the applicant qualifies under the standards in this subpart. The administrative law judge may require an applicant to file additional information to determine its eligibility for an award.
( b ) The net worth exhibit shall describe any transfers of assets from, or obligations incurred by, the applicant or any affiliate, occurring in the one-year period prior to the date on which the proceeding was initiated, that reduced the net worth of the applicant and its affiliates below the applicable net worth ceiling. If there were no such transactions, the applicant shall so state.
( c ) The net worth exhibit shall be included in the public record of the proceeding.
Exhibit 99.1


                Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer
                          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350


     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the
undersigned Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of WidePoint Corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Steve L. Komar
------------------------------
Steve L. Komar
August 14, 2002
# Operation Inherent Resolve Casualty

/ Published May 26, 2017
May 26, 201720170526-01**SOUTHWEST ASIA —**May 26, 2017
Allan 0. Crutckshanks 

P.O. Box 24 

Mineral, TX 78125 

Office of ReguIatkns and Interpretations 

Employee Benefits Secur 

U.S. Department of Lab , .- 

200 Constitution Avenue, NW,, 

Washington, OC 20210 

~ttentTan: Lifetime Income RFl 

I am responding to the request for publk men& on a proposal IRIN 1210-AR33) to require 

US, cttlzens to invest Wr rime savlngs ?I n RA and 401(k) accounts In annultles. I see this not 

as a proposal to help Mzens make better Investment decisions but rather as a means to fund 

the government debt by forcing the purchase of US. Treasury bonds. The offending bullet 

point In RIN 12- 2, - - - , giv . . . , r 

".";-,.".;y..*- .- A 

I find this bo be totally u-ptaMe. I urge you to not adopt this proposal. 

The stated reason is that investors are incapable d making Inbeillgent Investment decisions on 

their bwn. lh$dalm Is that the &dine In value of equity-based IRA and 401(k) accounts over 

the past hNO years shows poor investment dwisiioros. 

I contend that the equity values decllned because of government mbmanagement of the 

housing industry and not because of investors' inability to manage their own money. 

I also assert that the government has no legitlmiate daIm that it can htter manage rdrement 

assets than individuals. The evtdence k In the total mismanagement of the retirement program 

already under b control - Soclal Security - hCh IS underfunded and will shortly run out of 

Thls is the United States of Anserfca. Freedom tn make Investment decisions Is a fundamental 

rlght, The gwernment should not take the as& of its chixens except by legitimate bxatlon nor 

should It dlctate how those assets should be tmrested. Please don't let this happen.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of Comarco, Inc. I, Thomas A. Franza, Chief Executive Officer of Comarco, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | This annual report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Comarco, Inc.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                        
|----------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 1, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/    THOMAS A. FRANZA
|                  |  |  |  | Thomas A. Franza       
|                  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 802.12 Initial adverse agency determination on correction or amendment. If the System Manager determines that the record should not be corrected or amended in whole or in part, he will forthwith make such finding in writing, after consulting with the General Counsel, or his designee. The requester shall be notified of the refusal to correct or amend the record. The notification shall be in writing, signed by the System Manager, and shall include— ( a ) The reason for the denial;
( b ) The name and title or position of each person responsible for the denial of the request;
( c ) The appeal procedures for the individual for a review of the denial; and
( d ) Notice that the denial from the System Manager is appealable within 30 days from the receipt thereof by the requester to the Board.
The System Manager is allotted 10 working days (or within such extended period as is provided in the section concerning “unusual circumstances” *infra*) to respond to the request for review. If the requester does not receive an answer within such time, the delay shall constitute a denial of the request and shall permit the requester immediately to appeal to the Board, or to a district court.
#### Jared Webster, Respondent, v. Seth W. Nichols, as Executor, etc, of Eva H. Nichols, Deceased, Appellant.

Judgment modified by striking out costs, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Opinion by

Landon, J.,

and by Learned, P. J., dissenting
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-2158

___________ Household Automotive Finance, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Missouri. Paul Bernard Gorham, Jr.; * Dana Jai Gorham; * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees, * * Richard V. Fink, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: December 6, 2001 Filed: December 11, 2001

___________ Before McMILLIAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. This matter arises from the Chapter 13 bankruptcy of Paul and Dana Gorham. In their Chapter 13 plan, the Gorhams elected to retain an automobile financedthrough Household Automotive Finance Corporation (HAFC), pursuant to the “cramdown” option of 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(5)(B). The plan proposed that the Gorhams would pay HAFC interest at a rate of 9%, as determined by Local Rule for the United1 The Honorable Frank W. Koger, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
2 The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2- States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Missouri 3084-1.E. The local rule rate is calculated based on the 30-year treasury bond rate for a specified date, plus 2% nominal interest, and is referred to as the “Chapter 13 rate.” HAFC objected to the plan’s proposed interest rate, arguing that the appropriate rate was the 20.95% contract rate. The bankruptcy court 1 denied HAFC’s objection, holding that Rule 3084-1.E was a reasonable means of determining the appropriate interest rate in Chapter 13 cases, and that HAFC’s proposed rate improperly accounted for profit and overhead. HAFC appealed the decision to the district court, 2and the district court affirmed. In this appeal, HAFC argues that the bankruptcy court did not consider the evidence presented; and even if it did, it erred in concluding that the Chapter 13 rate was appropriate. We find the bankruptcy court reviewed the evidence before it and concluded that the Chapter 13 rate was appropriate in the circumstances, and that HAFC’s proposed rate was too high. Further, we find no clear error in the bankruptcy court’s conclusion that the Chapter 13 rate was reasonable. See United States v. Doud , 869 F.2d 1144, 1146 (8th Cir. 1989) (appropriate rate consists of risk-free rate plus additional reasonable interest to compensate creditor for risk of default; reviewing determination of proper rate for clear error). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.-3- A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          18,689
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             495
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                15,300
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     23,777
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          17,237
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            17,255
<LOANS>                                        125,601
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,010
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 204,159
<DEPOSITS>                                     188,964
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                888
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,258
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,049
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 204,159
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,411
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,403
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   490
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,304
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,918
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,961
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,343
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      217
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  54
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,415
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,584
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,584
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,011
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,348
<LOANS-PAST>                                       163
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 7,057
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,224
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      447
<RECOVERIES>                                        16
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,010
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,010
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
US, Jordanian female aviators partner in excellence
 
  By Capt. Monique Roux
  AMMAN, JORDAN – The U.S. and Royal Jordanian Air Forces are partnering to celebrate women in aviation.
This partnership, launched in September 2021 between the U.S. Air Force and RJAF, focuses on empowering women in aviation as a way to cultivate and strengthen relationships.
“We bring together U.S. and Jordanian female pilots to talk about shared goals in their chosen profession,” said Lt. Col. Alden Gilroy, U.S. Embassy Amman air attaché and chief of attaché operations. “These engagements have been very meaningful and greatly enhance the vital relationship between our two air forces, most especially as it relates to this very important partner nation program.”
For the RJAF, these are the first women aviators who are growing into their roles as leaders.
“This program is a fantastic opportunity to highlight the U.S. and RJAF commitment to supporting female aviators,” said Lt. Col. Jennifer Pruitt, 26th Expeditionary Rescue Squadron commander and HC-130J pilot. “The RJAF women are trailblazers and they are paving the way for future female aviators. It was an honor to meet them.”
Since their first meeting in the fall of 2021, these pioneers in female aviation have met on several occasions allowing the women to engage in team building and demonstrate their capabilities in the world of aviation.
“The female Jordanians are wonderful hosts,” said Capt. McKenna Hall, 26th ERQS HC-130J mission pilot. “Their professionalism, drive, and focused attitudes are wholeheartedly appreciated and admired. The RJAF fosters a wonderful environment for learning from each other’s militaries.”
The RJAF hosted an event in March highlighting their combat search and rescue capabilities. The engagement included a mission brief, CSAR exercise demonstration, static aircraft immersion tour and group lunch. The day-long event provided an opportunity for women from both militaries to build camaraderie, share career stories and encourage one another.
“The CSAR demonstration truly showcased the RJAF level of sophistication in aviation,” said Pruitt. “It is obvious how much the pilots love to fly and want to excel in their profession.”
Pruitt and her squadron returned the honor by hosting the RJAF female pilots several weeks later for a unique opportunity to fly a low-level HC-130J mission over outlying areas in the region.
“This experience was the first time I have ever seen that part of our country from an aircraft,” said Lt. Sana’a Alnsour, RJAF Unified Helicopter Command Squadron 8 UH-60 Black Hawk pilot.
Inspiring and empowering women in aviation is a shared goal for the U.S. and Jordanian Air Forces and this program offers unique opportunities to encourage excellence in their female aviators.
“Working with the U.S. female pilots is good for us,” said Alnsour. “We can use experiences like this to inspire a new generation of female RJAF.”
----------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of 1 

2 6 


LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 


PUBLICATION &, REGULATIONS 

As of: August 26, 2010 BRANCH Received: August 10, 2010 PUBLIC Status: Posted

Posted: August 26, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2da60 SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-2010-001O-0438 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: ryan christopher giel 

Address: 

charlotte, NC, 

Organization: wellness chiropractic 

General Comment 

See attached file(s) 

Attachments 

IRS-2010-0010-0438.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

https:llfdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency1componentlsubmitterInfoCoverPage ?Call=... 8/26/2010 
August 10, 20 I 0 

Office of Consumer Infonnation and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCII0-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care AI:t 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to fonnally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-201 0­

0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans shou:ld not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these 

regulations. 

Ryan C. Giel
Exhibit 32-3



Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code



The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Report on Form 10-K of Commonwealth Edison Company for the year ended December 31,
2004, that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Commonwealth Edison Company.



|                           |  |  |  |  |  |                       |  |                                                
|-------------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|                           |  |  | 
|Date:    February 23, 2005 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    JOHN L. SKOLDS
|                           |  |  |  |  |  |                       |  | John L. Skolds President Exelon Energy Delivery
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 6762

SHAHID L.A. MAJID, a/k/a Arthur R. Moseley , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. DR. CASSANDRA MEANS, Regional Dir.; SHERISSE D. BIRCH, CCC; DHO FRANCINE BACKMAN; WARDEN RANDALL WILLIAMS; ASSOC. WARDEN MARTELL; SCDC; IGB SHERMAN ANDERSON , Defendants

- Appellees,
and IGB JOHN DOE,
Defendant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Rock Hill

. Mary G. Lewis , District Judge. ( 0:19

- cv - 01937

- MGL )

Submitted : November 23, 2021 Decided: November 30, 2021

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Shahid L.A. Majid, Appellant Pro Se. Elloree Ann Ganes, HOOD LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Shahid L.A. Majid , a South Carolina prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s
order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and granting Defendants summary judgment in Majid’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil right s action, as well as denying his request for injunctive relief. We dismiss the appeal for lac k of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. In civil cases, p arties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court
extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
The distric t court entered the underlying judgment on March 25, 2021. Shahid’s proof of service reflects that Shahid filed the notice of appeal on April 27, 2021

— the day
he tender ed it to prison officials for mailing to th e court

. S ee Fed. R. App. P. 4(c) (1) ;
Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 , 276 (1988) . Thus, Shahid filed the notice of appeal the day after the 30

- day appeal period expired. B ecause Shahid failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dis miss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

 

I, John R. Lyon, President andChief Executive Officer of Vista Medical Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), dohereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(a)           the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofthe Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(b)           the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  August 14, 2003           |   |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                   |   |   |   |   |
| /s/  JOHN R. LYON                 |   |   |   |   |
| John R. Lyon                           |   |   |   |   |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |   |   |
|                                        |        |        |        |        |  |

 

----