1 IN FORMAT ION COLLECTI ON REQUEST (ICR) Part A of the Supporting Statement ( Draft

- March 20 1 4 ) 1. ID ENTIFICATION OF THE INFORMATION COLLECTION 1(a) Title: Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Detergent Gasoline (Renewal)

EPA I CR No. 1655. 0 9 , OMB Control No. 2060

- 0275 1(b) Abstract Gasoline combustion results in the formation of engine deposits. The accumulation of deposits, particularl y in the orifices of fuel injectors and on intake valves, ty pically results in increased emissions and reduced engine performance. As fuel injectors replaced carburetors in the 1980's, a number of vehicle manufacturers experienced problems with deposit formatio n. Detergent additives, which had been available for years to control deposits in carbureted vehicles, were improved to accommodate the new technology . However, their use was voluntary and there were no regulatory standards by

which to gauge their effectiveness. Congress recognized the importance of effective detergent additives in minimizing vehicle emissions, and added Section 211(1) in the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. It required gasoline to contain detergent additiv es, effective January 1, 1995 , and provided the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with the authority to establish specifications for such additives. The regulations at 40 CFR 80

- Subpart G implemented certification requirements for detergents and imposed a variety of recordkeeping and reporting requirements for certain parties involved with detergents, gasoline, or post

- refinery component (any gasoline blending stock or any ox ygen ate that is blended with gasoline subsequent to the gasoline refining process (PRC)). All gasolines must contain certified detergents, with the exception of research, racing, and aviation gasolines. The EPA maintains a list of certified gasoline detergents at http://www.epa.gov/otaq/additive.htm

. As of March 20 1 4 there were 3 74 certified detergents an d 1 7 detergent manufacturers . Most of the certification activity occurred during the earl y ye ars of the program. In 2012, 1 2 detergents were certified. In 2013 , onl y 3 new detergent s w ere certified. There are approximately

250 refiners and importers o f gasoline, 1 , 350 blenders of detergent into gasoline or PRC, 8 , 000 carriers of gasoline or PRC, 200,000 gasoline retail outlets, and 100,000 fleet facilities which handle gasoline. The estimated total annual burden for respondents for this collection is 2 20 , 1 8 1 hours and $ 20,180,587 , including $335, 04 0 in annualized capital or O&M costs. The estimated total annual Agency burden is 200 hours and $1 6 , 400 in labor costs.2 2. NEED FOR AND USE OF THE COLLECTION 2(a) Need/Authority for the Collection Motor vehicles comprise the major source of air pollution in most urban areas, and account for about half of the toxic air emissions in the United States. Gasoline detergents help to minimize emissions. Detergents are typicall y added to gaso line as it is loaded into tank trucks at terminals. Section 211(l) of the Clean Air Act (Act) requires that all gasoline contain effective detergent additives. Section 114 of the Act provides EPA with the authority to impose recordkeeping and reporting requirements if necessary for enforcement of statutory requirements. The recordkeeping and reporting requirements for this program, at 40 CFR 80

- Subpart G, are necessary

in order for EPA to certify detergents, to demonstrate that certified detergents are effective, to assure that gasoline contains certified detergents at the minimum concentration (also known as the lowest additive concentration (LAC)) necessary to be effective, and to deter violations. There is no standard test procedure for testing qual itatively and quantitatively

for specific detergents in gasoline, thus necessitating reliance on recordkeeping and reporting as detergents, gasoline, and PRC pass through the distribution sy stem. Blenders of detergent into gasoline or PRC are required to maintain records that demonstrate that the LAC is met, on average, each month at each automated blending facility , and b y batch at non

- automated facilities. These records are known as volumetric additive reconciliation (VAR) records. There is economic in centive to violate because uncertified detergents are typicall y less expensive, and blending a certified detergent at less than the minimum speci fied concentration will also sav e money . A detergent manufacturer has a variety of options under which it m ay certify a detergent. The primary

option is “National Generic Certification,” which allows the detergent to be used in any gasoline. We estimate that over 99% of detergents have been certified under this option. Other options include limiting a deterg ent to a Petroleum Administrative Defense District (PADD Certification), a specific gasoline pool (Fuel

- specific Certification), or California gasoline (CARB

- based Certification) , under California’s detergent certification rule. All the options may

be found at 40 CFR 80.163. 2(b) Practical Utility

/Users of the Data The list of certified detergents is publicl y available. The fuel, additive, and motor vehicle industries are well aware that gasoline must contain certified detergents. The list is monitored by the additive manufacturers in order to maintain an awareness of competitors. Manufacturers and distributors of gasoline, and blenders of detergent into gasoline, monitor the list to ensure that gasoline contains certified detergents and that the documentation accompanying gasoline indicates such. Most of the data submitted by the detergent manufacturers are confidential. Thus access is restricted to authorized EPA personnel and authorized contractors. Review of the data is3 necessary to determine if the detergent manufacturer has met the certification requirements for a specific detergent and can be certified b y EPA. The documentation accompanying the detergent, with the LAC and any

use restrictions, is used by the detergent blender to ensure p roper additization. Product transfer documents ( PTDs ) are monitored b y transferors and transferees to ensure that they

are handling legal detergents and gasolines. VARs are necessary for detergent blenders to demonstrate that they have additized properl y . As m entioned above, there is not a method of analyzing gasoline for the proper level of a certified detergent. Thus, the records required b y this rule, particularl y the VAR and certification records, are essential in EPA’s monitoring for compliance.

3. NONDUPLICATION, CONSUL TATIONS, AND OTHER COLLECTION CRI TERIA 3(a) Nonduplication The records required here are not available elsewhere. In many instances the records are already produced as a customary business practice. 3(b) Public Notice In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, EPA has solicited comments for a 60

- day period prior to submission of the I CR to OMB. Notice has been published in the Federal Register. 3(c) Consultations EPA consulted with the following people regarding this collection: May Thomas Sr HSES Analy st Afton Chemical Corporation 330 S. Fourth Street, 3 rd Floor Richmond, VA 23219 M ay .thomas@aftonchemical.com Chris J Fogarty Product Manager

– Fuel Additives BASF Corporation Mail Stop 4A2 100 Park Avenue Florham Park, NJ 07932 Chris.fogarty@basf.com4 Certification by

the detergent manufacturers, and the development of VAR and QA records b y blenders of detergent into gasoline or PRC, account for the regulatory burden. The other burdens discussed above are minor or customary business practices upon which the regulations did not impose significant additional burdens. As this program has matured, nearl y all of the applications for detergent certification now rel y on previous vehicle testing. We estimate only

one application annually is based on new testing. Consultations with detergent manufacturers indicate that they have become quite familiar with submitting applications based on previous testing, with burden estimates ranging from one to four hours f

or preparation and submittal of the application. For an application based on new testing, however, there have been broad range s of estimates, from 16 hours to 2 000 hours. We believe that, as with the previous I CR, a reasonable average continues to be 60 hours for a detergent certification. Past c onsultations with detergent blenders that use automated blending equipment (the vast majority

of blenders) also indicates a range of estimated VAR/QA burden, from about 30 to 260 hours per ye ar per facility . Th is is to be expected since there is a wide range in the size of these facilities and a wide range in the degree of sophistication utilized in implementing the VAR requirements and voluntary QA procedures. The estimate for a detergent blender that does not use automated equipment is 500 hours per ye ar. A major reason for the difference in burden between automated and non

- automated equipment is the VAR period, which may be up to 30 day s for automated equipment, but is by batch for non

- automated equipment an d calculated manually

. 3(d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection Certification of an additive is one

- time, with the exception of an annual fuel

- property report in the case of a fuel

- specific certification. (As of March 201 4 , there were no fuel

- specific certifications, and no indication that any would be forthcoming.) VAR records and PTDs are ongoing and necessary

for enforcement. The generation and transfer of PTDs are customary business practices. Researchers using gasoline without a certified deterg ent are required to submit a brief annual report on their activities. EPA believes that the annual reporting requirements are reasonable and that a less frequent collection would hamper enforcement. Thus, less frequent collection is not a practicable alt ernative. 3(e) General Guidelines All Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidelines are met. 3(f) Confidentiality Most of the information reported to EPA is business confidential and is governed b y the5 Freedom of Information Act regulations for E PA at 40 CFR 2. 3(g) Sensitive Questions There is no sensitive information requested.

4. THE RESPONDENTS AND THE INFORMATION COLLECTED 4(a) Respondents/SI C/NAICS Codes The respondents are related to the following major group Standard Industrialization Classification (SI C) codes: 5172

- Petroleum Products 2911

- Petroleum Refining The respondents are related to the following major group NAICS codes: 324110

- Petroleum Refineries 324199

- All Other Petroleum and Coal Products Manuf acturing 325110

- Petrochemical Manufacturing 325199

- All Other Basic Organic Chemical Manufacturing 424710

- Petroleum Bulk Stations and Terminals 424720

- Petroleum and Petroleum Products Merchant Wholesalers (except Bulk Stations and Terminals)
4(b) In formation Requested (i) Data Items

REPORTI

NG REQUIREMENTS Detergent Manufacturers For each detergent, the detergent manufacturer (includes an importer or a party which is6 not the manufacturer but is requesting certification as a detergent for a product manufactured b y another party) is required to: (1) submit a certification letter to EPA containing a variety of information concerning the certification testing and options for which certification is requested (80.161(b)(3), 80.163(c)(1)(iii), 80.164(a)); (2) submit certification test data, and/or the acceptance criteria a supplier must meet for detergent reactant materials, upon EPA request (80.165, 80.162(b)( 1)); (3) submit a detailed description of the detergent’s composition to EPA pursuant to the registration requirements for fuel additives at 40 CFR 79, addressing specific compositional descriptions identified in 40 CFR 80 and the LAC for each certification option (80.161(b)(1)(i),(ii),(ii)(A), 80.162); (4) ship a sample of the detergent and certain information concerning the sample to EPA, and if requested b y EPA, ship an additional sample (80.161(b)(2), 80.167(d)); (5) notify EPA in writing, with s upporting data, if there is a change in the LAC for which the additive is effective (80.161(b)(1)(ii)(C)); (6) notify , in writing, gasoline manufacturers (includes importers), detergent blenders, and all others who purchase the detergent, of the LAC and any use restrictions (80.161(c)); (7) submit certain information annually for each fuel

- specific certification option (80.164(c)(3)); (8) notify customers if a fuel

- specific certification is no longer valid (80.164(c)(3)(iii)); (9) if, upon receipt from EPA of a notice of intent of detergent disqualification, wishing to respond, submit written comments in an attempt to demonstrate compliance (80.161(e)(3), (4); and (10) submit a list of customers to EPA if EPA should issue a final decision to disqualify a certified detergent (80.161(e)(6)). Detergent Blenders A blender of detergent into gasoline or PRC: (1) is required to notify

EPA in writing if it intends to use a detergent at lower than its LAC, and, if requested b y EPA, must submit the data supporting the use of the lower concentration (80.161(d)(1), (2), (3));7 (2) who has certified under a fuel

- specific option, is required to supply , upon request, EPA with a sample of the test fuel or with blendstocks with which to formulate the te st fuel (80.167(d)); and (3) is required to generate VAR records (80.170), and, upon request, to provide EPA with VAR records and supporting documentation (80.170(g)). Transferors and Transferees A transferor of gasoline, detergent, or PRC, including any gasoline refiner, importer, reseller, distributor, carrier, retailer, wholesale purchaser

- consumer (WPC), oxygenate blender, detergent manufacturer, distributor, carrier, or blender, shall: (1) generate or obtain documentation for each shipm ent and provide this documentation (product transfer document (PTD)) to the transferee (with exception of delivery of detergent

- additized gasoline to motorists and small volumes to fleets) identifying the product, its detergent status if gasoline or PRC, and certain additional information (80.171); and (2) as a defense against liability , along with transferees, may establish quality

assurance (QA) procedures that involve the development of records in addition to those required by the rules (80.169). Rese archers A party conducting research on gasoline that does not contain a certified detergent is required to notify

EPA annually , in writing (80.173(a)(3)). Racing Gasoline/Aviation Gasoline Parties handling racing gasoline or aviation gasoline are required to generate or transfer PTDs indicating that these products are limited to those uses (80.173(b)(1)). Pump stands for racing gasoline or aviation gasoline must be appropriately labeled if located at a facility that dispenses gasoline to motor vehicle s (80.173(b)(2)).

RECORDKEEPI

NG REQUIREMENTS Most records are required to be kept for five ye ars, with exceptions for certain small businesses and California gasoline (80.164(c)(4), 80.169(c)(8), 80.170(g), 80.171(d)). This retention period is necessary in order to provide EPA with adequate time for inspection, is consistent with the relevant civil statute of limitations, and is consistent with the retention period for PTDs under the reformulated gasoline/anti

- dumping rules at 40 CFR 80

- Subpart D (except for retailers in anti

- dumping areas). There is no regulatory burden because businesses retain8 such records as a customary business practice. Detergent Manufacturers For each detergent, the detergent manufacturer is required to maintain records for: (1) the acceptance criteria for suppliers of detergent reactive materials (80.162(b)(1)); (2) the test data for fuel parameters supporting a fuel

- specific certification (80.164(c)(1)); (3) the fuel composition survey results, and documentation on test methods and statistical procedures, used to support a fuel

- specific certification (80.164(c)(4)); (4) the certification test (80.165); and (5) in order to have an affirmative defense for a potential violation of the certification program controls and prohibitions, the fourier transform infrared spectroscop y (FTIR) and related data for each detergent batch (80.169(c)(4)(i)(C),(D)). Detergent Blenders A blender of detergent into gasoline or PRC is required to maintain the VAR records on the use of the deterg ent (80.170). Gasoline or PRC additized in California is exempt, provided the records required b y California are maintained (80.173(c)). Transferors and Transferees Transferors and transferees of gasoline, detergent, or PRC: (1) are required to maintain the PTDs for each shipment (80.171); and (2) as a defense against liability , may establish QA procedures that involve retaining records in addition to those required to be retained b y the rules (80.169). Researchers A party conducting research on gasoline that does not contain a certified detergent is required to maintain documentation demonstrating that the gasoline has been used onl y for research (80.173(a)(1)). Racing Gasoline/Aviation Gasoline Parties handling racing gasoline or aviation gasoline are required to maintain the PTDs9 for each shipment (80.173(b)(1)). (ii) Respondent Activities The following are required: (1) Read and compreh end the regulatory requirements. (2) Train personnel to meet the requirements, employing new technol ogy and procedures as necessary . (3) Develop the informati on that is not already available. (4) Gather and organize the information. (5) Review the information and, if necessary , take corrective action such that it can be concluded that the regulatory requirements have been met. (6) Report the information to EPA and/or retain the information in storage, as specified in the regulations.

5. THE INFORMATION COLLECTED

–AGENCY ACTIVITIES, COLLECTION METHODOLOGY, AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 5(a) Agency

Activities The following are required: (1) Develop a thorough understanding of the regulatory requirements. (2) Develop the skills necessary to convey

the requirements to the respondents and others such that it can be comprehended easily

. (3) Respond to inquiries on the requirements. (4) Provi de access to the regulations and the list of certified detergents. (5) Review the reported information. (6) Contact the respondent when the information has not been submitted properly and discuss how the deficiency

can be corrected. (7) Store the information. (8) Enter the information into the database. (9) Upon concluding that all requirements have been met, issue a letter to the manufacturer indicating that the detergent has been certified, and update the list of certified detergents. (10) Maintain rigorous security for the protection of confidential business information. (11) Maintain computer hardware and software. (12) Monitor compliance via on

- site inspections. 5(b) Collection Methodology and Management The EPA has not issued forms. The respondents may submit and store the info rmation in10 the format of their choice, including electronicall y. Because most of the information reported to EPA is confidential, it is housed in an office with an advanced security s ys tem. The computers on which the data are handled have no linkage outs ide this office. 5(c) Small Entity

Flexibility The reporting requirements have been made as simple as practical in order to minimize the burden on all parties, large and small. For small businesses subject to this rule, the vast majority are merel y transporters or retailers of gasoline. Their only burden is the transfer and storage of PTDs, which is a customary business practice. Transfers of small volumes of additized gasoline to WPCs and other ultimate consumers are exempt from th e PTD requirements (80.171(c)). 5(d) Collection Schedule Reporting onl y required on occasion.

6. ESTIMATING THE BURDEN AND THE COST OF THE COLLECTION 6(a) and (b) Estimating Respondent Burden and Costs Estimating the burden is straightforward. Capital/start

- up costs were incurred by industry in 1995. Third party

activity , the transmittal or storage of PTDs, is a customary business practice. Operating and maintenance (O&M) costs are in three categories . First, the on

- road engine testing to demonstrate that the detergent meets the deposit

- control standards is performed at contractor facilities. The cost of this testing is about $20 0,000

. As discussed above, this testing is being performed for only one new certified detergent each year, with the other certifications based on previous testing. The second O&M cost is for copying and postage for the estimated three submissions annually for detergent certification and one submission annually for research no tification. At an estimated $10 per submission, the annual cost is $ 40 . The third O&M cost is for the storage of the VAR records at the 1300 automated detergent blending facilities and 50 non

- automated detergent blending facilities. The estimated annual cost per facility is $100 , for a total of $135,000

. Thus, the total annual O&M cost is $20 0,000 + $ 40 + $135,000 = $33 5, 04 0

. Three labor categories are involved: managerial (includes legal and professional review), technical, and clerical. According to the Bureau of L abor Statistics, May 20 1 1 National Industry

- Specific Occupational Employ ment and Wage Estimates, mean wages were: Wages Managerial $6 7 .4 4 per hour11 Technical $6 5

. 56 per hour Clerical $ 22

. 17 per hour Doubling for company overhead and employing a 2% annual inflation factor to bring the rates up to date , and, for convenience, rounding up to the nearest dollar, gives the following rates that will be used in this ICR: Total Employer Cost Managerial $1 35 per hour Technical $1 31 per hour Clerical $ 44 per hour Worksheet 1: Detergent Manufacturer Submissions for Certification Our review of the submissions indicates a fairl y wide range of burden. Many submissions are minor changes to existing certified detergents and are a ble to rely

on previously submitted data. We estimate that they require about four hours to prepare. About one out of 1 0 undergoes the complete development cycle with estimates of 16 to 2 000 hours of burden. Thus, we continue to believe that the average burden per detergent is estimated at about 60 hours, with the hours and costs al located as follows (we estimate three submissions annually ( 1 7 manufacturers) for the next three years):
**Activity Management**  **Technical Clerical** 
**Read** 2 hours/ $2 70 4 hours/$5 24 1 hour/$ 44
**Train** 2 hours/$2 70 2 hours/$2 62 1 hour/$ 44 **Develop data**  2 hours/$2 70 20 hours/$2 620 1 hour/$ 44 **Organize data**  2 hours/$2 70 4 hours/$5 24 1 hour/$ 44 **Review** 2 hours/$2 70 10 hours/$1 310 1 hour/$ 44 **Report or**  **retain** 2 hours/ $2 70 1 hour/$ 1 31 2 hours/$ 88 **TOTALS** 12 hours/$1 620 41 hours/$5 371 7 hours/$ 30812 GRAND TOTAL 60 hours/$ 7299
Worksheet 2: VAR and QA by Detergent Blenders with Automated Equipment As noted above, respondents indicated a fairl y wide range of burden, from 30 to 260 hours per ye ar per blending facility , for the 1300 facilities nationwide. The VAR period may be as long as 30 day s, but can be shorter due to changes in detergents, maintenance downtime, etc. We believe that a reasonable average burden is 150 hours per ye ar per facility , representing 15 VAR periods, for a total of 1300 x 15 = 19,500 responses annuall y. Thus, the estimated hours and costs per VAR period are:
**Activity Management**  **Technical Clerical** 
**Read** 0.1 hour/$ 13.50 0.8 hour/$ 104.64 0.4 hour/$ 17.52
**Train** 0.1 hour/$ 13.50 0.8 hour/$ 104.64 0.4 hour/$ 17.52 **Develop data**  0.1 hour/$ 13.50 1.4 hour/$ 183.32 1.33 hour/$ 56.60 **Organize data**  0.1 hour/$ 13.50 0.8 hour/$ 104.64 1.33 hour/$ 56.60
**Review** 0.1 hour/$ 13.50 0.8 hour/$ 104.64 0.73 hour/$ 26.28 **Retain** 0.1 hour/$ 13.50 0.2 hour/$ 26.16 0.4 hour/$ 17.52 **TOTALS** 0.6 hour/$ 81.00 4.8 hours/$6 28 .0 4 4.6 h ours/$ 1 92

. 0 4 GRAND TOTAL 10 hours/$ 901

. 08

Worksheet 3: VAR and QA by Detergent Blenders with Non

- automated Equipment There appears to be little blending occurring with non

- automated equipment. However, since it is done manually , and the VAR is done per batch, we estimate 500 hours per ye ar for such blend ers . It is estimated that a blender of this ty pe will do about a thousand batches per ye ar, or a burden of 0.5 hour per batch. Using the same labor mix as Worksheet 2 gives a per13 batch cost of $ 4 5

. 0 5 . We estimate that there are 50 blenders in this categ ory , for a total of 50,000 responses annually. Worksheet 4: Notification by Researchers We estimate that we will receive one letter annually from researchers notifying us that a gasoline w ithout a certified detergent will be used for research purposes. Assuming a management official spent one

- half hour on each letter and a clerical person also spent one

- half hour, g ives a burden of one hour and $ 8 9.50 per letter. 6(c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost The Agency

activities described in sectio n 5(a) are handled by engineers and scientists at the GS

- 13 level ( $8 2 per hour, including 160% overhead, as per OMB policy). It is estimated that 200 hours are spent annually , for a cost to the government of $1 6 , 400

. The program is running smoothly

and, as noted above, the number of requests for certification has decreased from the previous ICR. Lease, computer, and security costs are covered in the I CR for the Fuel and Fuel Additive Registration requirements at 40 CF R 79 (EPA I CR Number 309.11, OMB Control Number 2060

- 1050), with which this program is closely integrated. 6(d) and (e) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs, and

Bottom Line Burden and Costs The following worksheet is based on the above discussions. Worksheet 5: Annual Industry Burden **Activity Responses**  **Hours/Cost Total Hours/Cost**  **Detergent Certification**  3 60/$ 7299.00 180 /$ 21,897 **( 3**  **respondents) Automated**  **VAR/QA** 19,500 10/$ 901.08 195,000/$ 17,571,060 **(1300 respondents)** 
**Non**
**- automated**  **VAR/QA** 50,000 0.5/$ 4 5 .0 5 25,000/$ 2 , 252,500 **(50 respondents)**
**Researcher Letters**  1 1.0/$ 8 9.50 1 /$ 89.5014 **( 1**  **respondents) TOTALS**  **69,5 04**  **220, 181**  **/$ 1**  **9 ,**  **845 ,**  **5 47**  Thus, the net annual burden to industry is 22 0 , 181 hours (3.17 hours per response). Labor costs are $ 1 9 , 845 , 5 47 , and O&M costs are $ 335, 04 0 , for a total cost of $ 20 , 180 ,5 87

.

6(f) Reasons for Change in Burden The previous clearance consisted of 220,181 hours (3.17 hours per response), labor costs of $18,500,528, and O&M costs of $335,040, for a total cost of $18,835,568. There is no increase of hours in the total estimated respondent burden compared with the I CR currentl y approved b y OMB. The respondent universe and responses also remained the same in this collection. Th ere was an increase in cost to the industry of $1,345,019 per year due to updated numbers used to calculate the industry burden and to account for inflation. 6(g) Burden Statements The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 3.6 hours per response . Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended b y persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, instal l, and utilize technology and s ys tems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing way s to compl y with any previously

applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currentl y valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15. To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this I CR under Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2007

- 0595 , which is available for online viewing at www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Air and Radiation Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), WJC West, Room 3334 , 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C

. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday , excluding legal holiday s. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566

- 1744, and the telephone number for the Air and Radiation Docket is ( 2 02 )

- 566

- 1742 . An electronic version of the public docket is available at www.regulations.gov. This site can be used to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the public docket, and to access those documents in the pub lic docket that are available electronicall y.15 When in the sy stem, select “search,” then key in the Docket ID Number identified above. Also, yo u can send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17 th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2007

- 0595 and OMB Control Number 2060

- 0275 in any correspondence.