alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1210-AB32-2-1541.html[7/26/2015 7:20:42 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 11, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jx0-ax0r

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2038

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Elaine Valagura

General Comment

I can plan my own retirement. We do NOT need the Department of Labor to start enacting regulations that would

 restrict how we use our own money for retirement.
!"#$%

+	


	

&	

' 


(	)$*(*+ !"#$ %+$)$) #,,
)) 

## Reflections—In Search of Crosswalks between Macroeconomics and Environmental Economics V. Kerry Smith * Author Affiliations Abstract This article considers the challenges for efforts t o introduce environmental quality into modern macro models. These models desc ribe the economy as a dynamic general equilibrium, often using a repres entative agent to characterize consumers. Macro models are calibrated using a composite of existing parameter estimates, accepted features of developed economies, and data on the economy of interest together with t he conditions for a decentralized dynamic equilibrium. The task of intr oducing non-market goods into these models requires using consistent a ggregate measures of environmental quality. This Reflections column focuses on the issues associated with this research challenge. It also ex amines the static general equilibrium analysis used in EPA’s 2011 Prospective Analysis as a way to highlight the importance of addressing these issues . ( JEL : Q50, Q58). Key words environmental-macro analysis stylized facts benefit-cost analysis © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University P ress on behalf of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. All rights r eserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

About the Index Show related links Search across all sources in Oxford Index 

# Page 1 of 3 Reflections

—In Search of Crosswalks between Macroeconomics and Environmental Eco ...

11/ 7/2014 http://reep.oxfordjournals.org/content/6/2/298.abstractAbout the Index Show related links Search across all sources in Oxford Index 

# Page 2 of 3 Reflections

—In Search of Crosswalks between Macroeconomics and Environmental Eco ...

11/ 7/2014 http://reep.oxfordjournals.org/content/6/2/298.abstractOnline ISSN 1750-6824 - Print ISSN 1750-6816

Other Oxford University Press sites: Oxford University Press  Site Map Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal Notices Fre quently Asked Questions Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate th e text of the original print issues. All efforts have been ma de to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not b e held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department. Copyright © 2014 Association of Environmental and Resource Economist s

About the Index Show related links Search across all sources in Oxford Index 

# Page 3 of 3 Reflections

—In Search of Crosswalks between Macroeconomics and Environmental Eco ...

11/ 7/2014 http://reep.oxfordjournals.org/content/6/2/298.abstract
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

 

I, MICHAEL J. SHEA, certifythat:

 

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of COMPUTERHORIZONS;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisannual report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this annual report, fairly present in allmaterial respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;

 

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

 

a)  designed such disclosure controls and proceduresto ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

(c)  presented in this annual report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresbased on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

(a)  all significant deficiencies in the designor operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and

 

(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicatedin this annual report whether there were significant changes in internalcontrols or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controlssubsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any correctiveactions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 
| Date: March  15 , 2004   |
|--------------------------|
|                     |
| /s/ Michael  J. Shea     |   |
| MICHAEL J.  SHEA         |
| Chief  Financial Officer |

 

 

----
Exhibit 10.2





|                                |  |  |  |                                
|------------------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------
|                                |  |  |  | Fisher Communications, Inc     
|[Logo of Fisher Communications] |  |  |  | 100 4th Avenue North, Suite 440
|                                |  |  |  | Seattle, WA 98109              
|                                |  |  |  | Tel: (206) 404-6783            
|                                |  |  |  | Fax: (206) 404-6765            
|                                |  |  |  | www.fsci.com                   
|                                |  |  |  |                                
|                                |  |  |  | William W. Krippaehne Jr.      
|                                |  |  |  | President & CEO                
|                                |  |  |  | billk@fsci.com                 



May
3, 2004











Mr. David D. Hillard

14125 105thAvenue NE

Kirkland, WA 98034



Dear Dave,



This letter serves as follow up to your letter of April 19 addressed to James W. Cannon, as chairman of the Fisher Communications, Inc. Compensation Committee requesting
a waiver of the three (3) month limitation on exercise of your stock options following termination of employment.



Please be advised by this letter that the Committee has agreed to your request to waive the three (3) month limitation of section 13(a) of the Incentive Plans and that
such period shall now be consistent with the five (5)year period contained in Section13(b) of such Incentive Plans.



Sincerely,



/s/ William W. Krippaehne Jr.





|Cc: | Robert Bateman
|--- | --------------

| | Laura Boyd
| | ----------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFOMRATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
YEAR ENDED AUGUST 30, 1998 FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO IT
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000023249
<NAME>                        Concord Fabrics Inc.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             AUG-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  AUG-30-1998
<CASH>                                          8,678,053
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  18,003,495
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                    16,015,819
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               60,515,431
<PP&E>                                          9,159,596
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 75,884,130
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10,816,390
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                        1,842,554
<OTHER-SE>                                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   75,884,130
<SALES>                                       101,296,721
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              101,296,721
<CGS>                                          70,644,721
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  96,513,893
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                777,133
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 4,782,828
<INCOME-TAX>                                    2,030,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,752,828
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.72
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23 - Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-24298) pertaining to the Employees' 
Stock Benefit Plan of Latshaw Enterprises, Inc. of our report 
dated December 12, 1995, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedules of Latshaw Enterprises, Inc. included in 
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended October 28, 1995.


                                     /s/Ernst & Young LLP
                                     Ernst & Young LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
January 19, 1996
# Dec. 28: Statement by U.S. Central Command Commander on ISF progress in Ramadi

/ Published Dec. 28, 2015

December 28, 2015RELEASE #20151228-01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**TAMPA, Fla.****—** Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III, U.S. Central Command commander, released the following statement today:"Enabled by the efforts of the international coalition, Iraq's security forces have secured the Government Center complex in Ramadi.  We congratulate them on this important operational achievement.  Coupled with other recent ISIL losses across Iraq and Syria, including at Tikrit, Bayji, al Hawl, the Tishrin Dam, and Sinjar, the seizure of the Government Center clearly demonstrates that the enemy is losing momentum as they steadily cede territory.  Looking ahead, I expect our partners on the ground in both Iraq and Syria, with coalition assistance, to continue to roll back ISIL gains as we work together to defeat this enemy."
----

(2004/C 88 E/0298)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2677/02

by Chris Davies (ELDR) to the Commission

(24 September 2002)

Subject:   Fire safety

What role does the Commission have in promoting best practice between Member States and their fire authorities with a view to reducing death and injury from fire?

Does the Commission have any plans to introduce new building design regulations intended to provide all EU citizens with minimum standards for protection from fire-related injury by requiring the installation of such devices as smoke detectors and sprinkler systems?

Does the Commission recognise national or regional fire brigades in each Member State as the lead bodies to deal with issues of community fire safety, and are they treated as such for the purpose of consultation about health and safety issues relating to fire?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(15 October 2002)

The Community has no general competence in fire safety. However, the Community does contribute to fire safety through several directives and initiatives taken under different Community policies, in accordance with the subsidiarity principle.

As a direct consequence, the structure and the competences of national, regional or local fire brigades vary from one Member State to the other, and the Commission has no competence to establish common rules on which all Member States could agree.

In the area of civil protection, the Commission has taken several initiatives to allow fire brigades to identify their most urgent needs. As far as the promotion of best practices between Member States is concerned, within the Community action programme for civil protection, Sweden has recently been mandated as the lead country for a fire prevention project that aims to identify best practice between Member States.

The Commission does not have plans to make mandatory the installation of smoke detectors and sprinkler systems. In many of the Member States such provisions exist already. However, fire alarm/detection, fixed fire-fighting and fire and smoke controlproducts are covered by Council Directive 89/106/EEC of 21 December 1988 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to construction products (1). Under this Directive there are common instruments for labelling the safety in case of fire characteristics of construction products. These are the ‘Euroclasses’ for reaction to and resistance to fire, which will allow the performances of products to be easily recognised in all Member States.

Only Member States have the prerogative to designate which bodies should deal with Community fire safety issues. However, at Community level, relevant initiatives are usually discussed with all the interested parties represented at European level.

----

(1)OJ L 40, 11.2.1989.

----
IV

House Calendar No. 109

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 314

[Report No. 107–335]

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 13 (legislative day, DECEMBER 12), 2001

Mr. DIAZ-BALART, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

1 Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on

2 the legislative day of Wednesday, December 19, 2001, for

3 the Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend

4 the rules, provided that the object of any such motion is

5 announced from the floor at least one hour before the mo6 tion is offered. The Speaker or his designee shall consult

7 with the Minority Leader or his designee on the designa8 tion of any matter for consideration pursuant to this reso9 lution.
House Calendar No. 109

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 314

[Report No. 107–335]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend

the rules.

DECEMBER 13 (legislative day, DECEMBER 12), 2001

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/19

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★ ■

■

■ ■

★

● ●

●

●

★

●

●

● ●
# Mattis Looks to NATO, Future of ISIS Fight

/ Published Feb. 12, 2018
WASHINGTON, 
Defense Secretary James N. Mattis left yesterday on a six-day trip to meet with defense leaders from around the world to chart the way ahead against the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria.

The secretary is now in Rome and will move on to Brussels for this year’s first NATO defense ministerial, before traveling on to Stuttgart to visit U.S. Africa and European commands, finally wrapping up his trip in Munich to attend the 54th Munich Security Conference.

Mattis said the fight against ISIS has gone well, but that hard fighting remains. He said the terror group has been pushed out of Iraq, but is still a problem in Syria’s Euphrates River Valley.

**Defeat-ISIS Campaign**

The battlespace there is complex, the defense secretary said, with Assad regime forces violating the deconfliction line at the river, forcing a coalition response. “We crossed the river in Tabqa, for example, all coordinated with ... through the Russians, and in this case, [regime forces] came across the river and went some 10 miles, veered directly toward one of our positions,” Mattis told reporters traveling with him. “They knew it was our position. How do we know that? Because they began shelling it.”

There were Americans at the position and they responded and stopped the incursion. The Syrian force retreated back to the west side of the river.

“In Rome, we'll be talking about the way ahead, and this has to do also with the recovery efforts for the area that were occupied by ISIS,” he said. “As you know, they tore the heck out of those places, and so there's a lot of recovery that's got to go on, and we'll be talking about that as well.”

Recovery will be important in the affected areas. Removing improvised explosive devices; opening schools; and restoring basic services such as water, electricity and gas will be crucial to stopping the terror group from coming back.

**NATO**

In Brussels, the secretary will participate in the first NATO defense ministers meeting since the release of the National Defense Strategy and the Nuclear Posture Review. He has received praise from allies on the documents.

The secretary will stress alliance modernization and burden-sharing. He wants all allies to carry their full shares of the load. “[NATO] is engaged in fighting now as you know in Afghanistan,” he said. “Afghanistan will be a key part of the discussion there in Brussels. And as you know, we remain unambiguously committed to the alliance and to our allies, and that comes through loud and clear in the National Defense Strategy and underneath the White House National Security Strategy.”

(Follow Jim Garamone on Twitter: @GaramoneDoDNews)
DIVISION

Page I of I

SAL PRO SOL ATIONS BE iQ sy 2- 1G AIG 2 3 2019

PUBLICATIO 08 ACH

[As of: August 23, 2010

PUBLIC Status: Posted,

Posted: August 23, 2010

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16,

Submission Type: Web

2010)

Docket: IRS-2010-0010

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0313
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: rebecca lowell!
Address:
211 north hill road
buckfield, ME, 04220
Email: rebecca.lowelll@yahoo.com

General Comment

See attached file(s)

Attachments

IRS-2010-0010-0313.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=...

8/23/2010



8/10/2010

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to
Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. | specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

Rebecca Lowell
## IN-SERVICE TRANSFORMER MODEL Presented at QUARTERLY REVIEW MEETING DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMER DETERMINATION STUDY J U N E 13, 1994 STEVE CO H N Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN 37830TRANSFORMER ENERGY LOSS MODEL

A) CALCU LA

TI ON OF STOCK ASSUME INITIAL STOCK IN MVA D EVELOP RETIREMENT FUNCTION ATTACH RETIREMENT FUNCTION TO EACH VINTAGE RETIRE INITIAL STOCK ANNUALLY B) CALCULATION OF ADDITIONS TO STOCK DEVELOP STOCK OF TRANSFORMERS IN MVA CALCULATE ANNUAL ADDITIONS BY SUBTRACTING D ECLINING INITIAL STOCK AND SUM OF DECAYED ADDITIONS TO TIME T C) CONVERT STOCK AND ADDITIONS FROM MVA TO NUMBER OF TRANSFORMERS D) APPLY ESTIMATED LOSSES TO TSFORMER STOCK AND ADDITIONSDISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMER DATA AVAILABLE TRANSFORMER STOCK PROXY INITIAL YEAR SUMMARY OF FERC FORM 1 INFO (EIA) PEAK LOAD (EEI) '52 RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS (EEI) '52 VALUATION OF DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMERS (FPC) '52 TRANSFORMER ANNUAL ADDITIONS TO STOCK NEMA FORM 590-B ' 8 1 ELECTRICAL WORLD ANNUAL T&D SURVEY '65 FERC FORM 1 '79 INITIAL STOCK, ADDITIONS, RETIREMENTS, AND FINAL STOCKDISTRIBUTION T RANSFORMER STOCK BASED ON GROWTH OF CUSTOMERS AND/OR PEAK LOAD TOTAL % INCREASE TIME PERIOD RES. & COMM.

CUSTOMERS PEAK LOAD 1961 - 1970 20.7 94.8 1971 - 1980 24.7 46.2 1981 - 1990 1 16.9 1 27.1

### Estimation of additions

2 Time

### Retirem 

### en t f uncti 

### on: Wei bu ll 

### d istri 

### b
. (Parameters : a=35, b=4)



### 20 30 Year

### U. D istri b uti on Transformer S tock



## 9 1600000



### 200000 1 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Year

### U . S . Additions (units)

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Year

### U . S. Transformer Inventory

' ' 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Year 

### 10

### Load and no - load losses

(25 kVA transformer) 350 250 200 CU m Losses uncertain

No-load losses 0 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 Year

### CALC ULATIO N S FOR U.S. DISTRIBUTION

TRANSFORMER L O S SES TRANSFORMER STOCK AN D ADDITI ON S EN E RGY LOSSES UTILIZE NO-LOAD AND LOAD LOSSES AND LOAD FACTOR TRNS(Ti) * DR(T2) * (ENL(T) + ELD(T) * (LF(T))IN-SERVICE DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMER MODEL

STRENGTHS: Capital stock approach allows accumulation of vintages Energy losses associated with each vintage Retirement function attempts to simulate fraction of inventory remaining at year t Calibrated model predicts current sales reasonability Forecast results take into consideration current inventory as well as new technologies WEAKNESSES: Transformer inventory based on peak load growth Calculation of annual sales based on heavily on retirement function Heavy reliance placed on estimates of energy losses for each vintage Model utilizes a simplistic energy loss formulation