alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John E. Panning, Chief Financial Officer of Gevity HR, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m); and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.





By:

/s/    JOHN E.
PANNINGJohn E. Panning Chief
Financial Officer





Dated:  August 14, 2002
[August 9,2010] 

Office ofConsumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department ofHealth and Human Services 

Attention: OCll<h9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016. 


Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 


Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plaps and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-2010­

0010-0001 ). 1- --­ -~ 

1 I believe the consumer protections included as part ofthe new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort ! should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation ofthese 

regulations. 

[Cynthia M Geise] 

".. ,.' .-­
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF
  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
  PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Garry L. Anselmo, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
  Officer of Silverado Gold Mines Ltd., (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant
  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company
        for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2003 (the "Annual Report") fully
        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
        of operations of the Company.                                                                                     



| | By:    | /s/ Garry L. Anselmo       
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | Garry L. Anselmo           
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | October 19, 2004           

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
  and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form
  10-KSB. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company
  and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
  10-KSB pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
  except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
  purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
  "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
  reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
  Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates
  it by reference.

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

** CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of ComputerHorizons Corp. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “AnnualReport”), I, Dennis J. Conroy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, herebycertify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Section 1350), that:

1.    the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year endedDecember 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. Section 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:   March 9, 2007 |     | /s/ DENNIS J. CONROY |
|--------------------------------------|----------|---------------------------|
|                                 |     | DENNIS J. CONROY          |
|                                 | * * | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

This certification accompanies this Report onForm 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed bythe Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed tobe incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933,as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Companyspecifically incorporates it by reference.

 

----
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-60160

Conference Calendar

__________________

PATRICK STEWART,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JIMMIE CARLISLE, Cpt., George Co.

C.W.C., ET AL.,

 Defendants,

SABRINA MARTIN, Director of

Offender Services, S.M.C.I.,

ET AL.,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:92-CV-434-RR

- - - - - - - - - -

(October 18, 1995)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Patrick Stewart appeals the denial of his motion brought

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). His motion for correction of

the record is DENIED as unnecessary. We review for abuse of

discretion. Aucoin v. K-Mart Apparel Fashion Corp., 943 F.2d 6,
No. 95-60160

-2-

8 (5th Cir. 1991). "It is not enough that the granting of relief

might have been permissible, or even warranted -- denial must

have been so unwarranted as to constitute an abuse of

discretion." Seven Elves, Inc. v. Eskenazi, 635 F.2d 396, 402

(5th Cir. Unit A 1981). 

The record indicates that Stewart failed to inform the court

of any transfer between October 1993 and the date in January in

which the court signed the order and judgment dismissing

Stewart's case. Moreover, Stewart's exhibits do not indicate a

housing transfer between October 1993 and January 1994. Further,

a review of the disclosure form which the district court required

Stewart to complete and to file indicates that the questions were

factual in nature and did not require necessarily the use of a

law library in order to complete the form. Stewart does not deny

that he received the form. He merely contends that he did not

receive it until January 19, 1994. Under these circumstances,

the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the

Rule 60(b) motion. See Aucoin, 943 F.2d at 8-9. 

To the extent that Stewart argues that the district court

erred by delaying any evidentiary hearing before the judgment of

dismissal and that the court violated Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(5),

these matters were not raised in the district court. This court

need not address issues not considered by the district court. 

"[I]ssues raised for the first time on appeal are not reviewable

by this court unless they involve purely legal questions and

failure to consider them would result in manifest injustice." 
No. 95-60160

-3-

Varnado v. Lynaugh, 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991) (internal

quotation and citation omitted).

AFFIRMED.
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*Dunkirk and Fredonia Railroad Company v. The City of Dunkirk.

The assessment and the confirmation of it by the common council affirmed, with costs and disbursements to the relator, which are fixed at fifty dollars. Opinion by

Bradley, J.;

Barker, J., not sitting.
## MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**

**FAA -**  **2013 -**  **048 9**  Docket Number
**2008 -**  **SW -**  **00 3**  **- AD**  Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket Bell Alert Se rvice Bulletin No. 206L - 05 - 134, Revision A, dated April 9, 2007.


### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOURS OF :**  9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
#### Robert O. Y. Warren v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc., of Delaware, a Delaware corporation.

*(April*16, 1951.)

Carey, J., sitting.

*William Prickett*for plaintiff.

*Albert L. Simon*for defendant.

Superior Court for New Castle County,

No. 573,

Civil Action, 1950.

*189Carey, J.:

 It has frequently been held in Delaware that the *190violation of a rule of the road such as the ones here involved is negligence *per se*but that such negligence is not actionable, nor is it available under a plea of contributory negligence, unless it is a proximate cause of damage to another. *Lynch v. Lynch,*9 *W. W. Harr.*1, 195 *A.*799. Ordinarily, whether such negligence is a proximate cause is a jury question but, like most such questions, it should he left to the jury only when there is 'a dispute of fact or when more than one reasonable inference may be drawn from the proven facts. 38 *Am. Jur.*1056, *et seq. For*example, in *Brown v. Schendelman,*4 *W. W. Harr.*50, 143 *A.*42, the Court held that there was no causal connection between the violation of the ordinance there involved and the injury complained of, and sustained a demurrer to the declaration for that reason. In *Lindsay v. Cecchi,*3 *Boyce*133, 80 *A.*523, 35 *L. R. A. (N.*S.) 699, the Supreme Court found that there was no possibility of causal connection between the violation of a cited statute and the injury to the plaintiff, and held that the lower Court was wrong in submitting the case to the jury.

In the present instance, the defendant argues that the matter of proximate cause as applied to these two counts should be left to a jury, but, from the facts as gathered from the complaint and answer, I am unable to perceive any causal relation between the alleged violation of these two sections and the occurrence of the accident. The proximity of the railroad track and the nearness of the crest of a hill are simply of no significance in relation to the occurrence of this collision. In my opinion, it would be error to submit the issue of proximate cause *to*a jury under these circumstances. *Salvitti v. Throppe,*343 *Pa.*642, 23 *A.*2d 445, 138 *A. L. R.*842.

The foregoing conclusion answers the substance of defendant’s argument and makes it unnecessary to consider certain other contentions made by counsel. Plaintiff’s motions will be granted.
IV 

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 598

Expressing the condolences of the House of Representatives on the death 

of the Honorable Paul D. Wellstone, a Senator from the State of Minnesota. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 12, 2002

Mr. OBERSTAR submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION

Expressing the condolences of the House of Representatives 

on the death of the Honorable Paul D. Wellstone, a 

Senator from the State of Minnesota.

1 Resolved, That the House has heard with profound 

2 sorrow of the death of the Honorable Paul D. Wellstone, 

3 a Senator from the State of Minnesota. 

4 Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolu5 tions to the Senate and transmit a copy thereof to the 

6 family of the deceased. 

7 Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it ad8 journ as a further mark of respect to the memory of the 

9 deceased Senator.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 578 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      October 10, 2002.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 5011) making 
appropriations for military construction, family housing, and base realignment 
and closure for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 
30, 2003, and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference 
report and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be 
considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU NE 2 5 , 2015

NO. 03

- 14

- 0030 6

- CR

Wesley Eugene Perkins, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR , PEMBERTON, AND FIE LD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment of guilty r en d ered by the trial court. Having reviewed the

record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial

court’s judgment of guilty . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of guilty

.

A ppellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Cou rt and in the court below

.
-----Original Message-----

From: Joan Lane [mailto:jlane91617@aol.com] 

Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2015 5:28 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: elimination of options trading from IRAs

Dear Sirs,

 The elimination of the ability to trade options in iras would be a great hardship to my wife and 

myself. The total lack of acceptable returns from normal sources (banks certificate of deposit, money 

market accounts and such) makes the use of covered calls and covered puts a godsend. 

 Contrary to opinion stating that options expose us to extreme liability, the opposite is true. With 

the use of hedge options , we were able to offset the recent turbulence in the market. I implore you to 

not take these tools away. It would be a disaster to many of us retirees without pensions if you did.

 Sincerely,

 

 Joan and Michael Lane

 16612 Hidden Cove Dr

 Jupiter, Fl 33477

 561-748-5634

 JLane91617@aol.com
From: Barb Howison [mailto:grandaunt61@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2010 10:08 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

As a patriotic American, I implore you to stop the passage of any legislation that involves the 

government getting into any one's 401K or IRA accounts. We are good law abiding citizens and we 

have been quiet too long. 

Thank you.
1210-AB32-2-1636.html[7/26/2015 9:21:34 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jy0-wghn

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2133

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: john pryke

Address:

29590 osborne rd

north liberty, IN, 46554-9731

Email: prykej@kconline.com

Phone: (219) 363-5426

General Comment

dear sir: please keep your bible out of my 401k. i don't need your help.
# Readout of Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Milley’s Meeting with Jordanian Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Maj. Gen. Yousef Huneiti 

/ Published Nov. 25, 2019

Nov. 25, 2019

WASHINGTON--Joint Staff Spokesperson Col. DeDe S. Halfhill provided the following readout:

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark A. Milley met with Jordanian Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Maj. Gen. Yousef Huneiti yesterday in Amman, Jordan.

The two leaders discussed several issues of mutual concern in the Middle East and the broader regional security situation. Gen. Milley affirmed the U.S. commitment to its strategic security relationship with Jordan in facing regional and global challenges.

The U.S. and Jordan share a strong military-to-military relationship as key partners committed to peace and security in the Middle East region.  

For more Joint Staff news, visit: www.jcs.mil.Connect with the Joint Staff on social media: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube,LinkedIn and Flickr.
SJVUAPCD 12/17/92 4301 - 1 RULE 4301 FUEL BURNING EQUIPMENT (Adopted May 21, 1992, Amended December 17, 1992) 1.0 Purpose The purpose of this rule is to limit the emission of air contaminants from fuel burning equipment. This rule limits the concentration of combustion contaminants and specifies maximum emission rates for sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and combustion contaminant emissions. 2.0 Applicability The provisions of this rule shall apply to any fuel burning equipment except air pollution control equipment which is exempted according to Section 4.0.

3.0 Definitions 3.1 Fuel Burning Equipment: any furnace, boiler, apparatus, stack, and all appurtenances thereto, used in the process of burning fuel for the primary purpose of producing heat or power by indirect heat transfer. 3.2 Fuel Burning Unit: the minimum number of fuel burning equipment, the simultaneous operations of which are required for the production of useful heat or power. 4.0 Exemptions 4.1 Fuel burning equipment serving primarily as air pollution control equipment by using a combustion process to destroy air contaminants shall be exempt from the provisions of this rule. 5.0 Requirements 5.1 A person shall not discharge into the atmosphere combustion contaminants exceeding in concentration at the point of discharge, 0.1 grain per cubic foot of gas calculated to 12% of carbon dioxide at dry standard conditions. 5.2 A person shall not build, erect, install or expand any non-mobile fuel burning equipment unit unless the discharge into the atmosphere of contaminants will not and does not exceed any one (1) or more of the following rates: 5.2.1 200 pounds per hour of sulfur compounds, calculated as sulfur dioxide (SO 2 );SJVUAPCD 12/17/92 4301 - 2 5.2.2 140 pounds per hour of nitrogen oxides, calculated as nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ); 5.2.3 Ten (10) pounds per hour of combustion contaminants as defined in Rule 1020 (Definitions) and derived from the fuel. 5.3 Nothing in this rule shall be construed as preventing the maintenance or preventing the alteration or modification of an existing fuel burning equipment unit which will reduce its mass rate of air contaminant emissions.

6.0 Test Methods The following test methods shall be used to determine compliance with the requirements of section 5.0: 5.1 Particulate matter concentration - EPA Method 5; 5.2 Carbon dioxide concentration - ARB Method 100; 5.3 Oxides of nitrogen concentration - ARB Method 100; 5.4 Sulfur compounds concentration - EPA Method 8 or ARB Method 8; 5.5 Stack gas velocity - EPA Method 2; 5.6 Stack gas moisture - EPA Method 4.
Exhibit 23

                (Letterhead of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP)

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements 
of Coachmen Industries, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-59251, No. 2-45373, 
No. 2-47923, No. 2-56027 and No. 2-64572) and in the related Prospectus of 
our report dated January 29, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated 
financial statements and financial statement schedule of Coachmen Industries,
Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for each of the 
three years in the period ended December 31, 1998, which report is included 
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                 /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP              
                                 -------------------------------
                                     PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

South Bend, Indiana
March 23, 1999
# CENTCOM updates counterterrorism strikes in Yemen

/ Published Feb. 6, 2018

February 6, 2018

Release Number 20180201-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla. –** U.S. forces conducted eight air strikes in Yemen in December 2017 and 10 air strikes in January targeting both Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula and ISIS-Yemen.

One air strike resulted in the death of AQAP external operations facilitator Miqdad al Sana’ani Dec. 15, 2017, in al-Bayda governorate. Another strike killed Habib al-Sana’ani, AQAP deputy arms facilitator Dec. 19, 2017, in Marib governorate. Habib al-Sana’ani was an intermediary with ties to senior AQAP leadership and responsible for facilitating the movement of weapons, explosives and finances into Yemen.

U.S. forces continue sustained counterterrorism operations against AQAP and ISIS-Y in coordination with the government of Yemen to degrade these groups’ ability to hold territory and coordinate external attacks.

“Every strike advances the defeat of violent extremist organizations, and protects the United States and partner nations from attack at home and abroad,” said Lt. Col. Earl Brown, a U.S. Central Command spokesperson.

-30-
U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-2391
**Surficial Geologic Map of the Greater Omaha Area, Nebraska and Iowa**
*By* Ralph R. Shroba, Theodore R. Brandt, *and* Jeffrey C.Blossom
Version 1.0

This report is presented in Portable Document Format. The latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader or similar software is required to view it. If you wish to download the latest version of Acrobat Reader free of charge, click here.

**PDF files:**Map PDF file (8.7 MB)Text-only Map PDF file (236 KB)(This version of the report is accessible as defined in Section 508.)
**Metadata:** Metadata TEXT file (40 KB)
**Archived GIS files (not Section 508 accessible):** TARRED and GZIPPED ArcInfo files, metadata, etc. (19 MB) ZIPPED ArcInfo files, metadata, etc. (15 MB)
A high-resolution plot of this map can be purchased from Information Services,U.S. Geological Survey (1-888-ASK-USGS).

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices
U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey      URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/mf/2001/mf-2391/Questions or Assistance: USGS Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thr Dec  1 12:07 EDT 2016