alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.37 MB)
 
 JRTC Fort Polk Joint Readiness Training Center FORT BENNING andsf 1st Security Force Assistance Brigade 1st SFAB Afghan National Defense Security Forces combat advising
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS 

### WHO HAVE FILED AGREEMENTS TO BE APPROVED AS A DEPOSITORY OF TRUST ACCOUNTS AND TO PROVIDE DISHONORED CHECK REPORTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 221, Pa.R.D.E. 

### New Name Change 667

# - First Federal Bank

### of the 

### Midwest

# - Change 

### to 667 - 

### Premier Bank 

### Platinum Leader Change 58

# - Fulton Bank - 

### Remove 

### Correction Removal



### Submitted: 

### 7/31/2020
#### Same v. Same

Judgment affirmed. Opinion, by

Daniels, J.
# Death of a Coalition Service Member 

/ Published Aug. 20, 2018

August 20, 2018

Release # 20180820-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 

**SOUTHWEST ASIA –** One Coalition service member was killed and several injured when their aircraft crashed at approximately 10 p.m. GMT Aug. 19 in Iraq.

The aircraft was conducting a partnered counterterrorism mission in support of Operation Inherent Resolve.

All personnel were recovered by Coalition forces immediately following the incident, and three were evacuated for further treatment.

There are no indications the crash was caused by hostile fire. The incident is under investigation.

The deceased service member’s name and further details pertaining to the incident will be released by the pertinent national authorities.

-30-
TIME 1300 HRS 

DATE 3/6/2015 

RECORD OF CONVERSATION 

NAME(S) OF PERSON(S) CONTACTED OR IN CONFERENCE AND LOCATION 

Ray Johnson, FAA Airmen Training and Certification Branch, AFS-81 0 

Mr. Kyle Witham, With rotor Aviation Inc. 

SUBJECT 

Request for further information, With rotor Aviation, Inc. (With rotor) petition for exemption 

Docket F AA-20 15-0123 

DIGEST 

On February 26, 2015, I contacted Mr. Witham for information needed to support With rotor's 

request for exemption. This included the special purpose operations that With rotor conducts in the 

aircraft that would be used under the exemption and the type certificate data sheet pertinent to 

those aircraft. 

Mr. Witham responded with the requested information on March 6, 2015 (via email). 

CONCLUSION, ACTION TAKEN, OR REQUIRED 

The information provided by With rotor will be used by the FAA during the consideration of the petition 

for exemption. 

I R•y JohMoo, AFS-81~~
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.9 MB)
 
 USAFCENT ADAB U.S. Air Force USCENTCOM AFCENT F-35 Deployed U.S. Central Command Deployment Air Force CENTCOM U.S. Air Forces Central Command F-35A F-35A Lightning II UAE Al Dhafra Air Base 380 AEW 380th Air Expeditionary Wing F-35's first deployent
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
LEGAL PRoces 16 PEC HEYRAO

Page | of 1
JUL 2 1 2019

As of: July 21, 2010
PUBLIC Status: Posted

Posted: July 21, 2010

S U B M ISSIO N Cnn Net September 15, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0002
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Status as Grandfathered Health Plan uncer
the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Cross-Reference

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0008
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14487

Dnknsin, Submitter Information

General Comment

Hypothetical example for clarification:

A health plan that issues individual policies has a number of different benefit packages marketed
as plans to consumers. The interim final regulations state that each benefit package must meet
the requirements to maintain grandfather status. In these tough economic times, however, many
members have approached and are approaching the health plan saying that they wish to
maintain health coverage but cannot afford the current benefit package they are in now. They are
switching from one benefit package to a lower priced one that has either fewer benefits or
perhaps a smaller and more restrictive network of providers. Others may also approach the
company and change benefit packages because they seek greater benefits at higher cost or wish
to move to a less restrictive network. While it is clear that anyone who joined the plan after
3/23/10 would not be grandfathered if they switched anyway, would an indidivual who had
coverage on 3/23/10 lose their grandfather status if they switched to a different benefit package
with the same health plan (1) for economic and ability to pay reasons; or (2) for other than
economic reasons.

We believe that the departments should view a change in benefit package within a health plan by
a member (whether for fewer benefits and lower price or greater price and greater benefits) as
allowable and the member should retain grandfather status in that new benefit package. If the
departments do not view this as possible, the departments should consider retention of
grandfather status by members who switch benefit packages within health plans through a
certian date in the near future (post 3/23/10 but before 9/30/10 or 12/31/10) because of the fact
that the interim final regulations only recently came out and plans and members are still not clear
on these complex issues.

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=..._ 7/21/2010
1 of 25ELECTRONICALLY FILED AUG 02, 2017 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT2 of 253 of 254 of 255 of 256 of 257 of 258 of 259 of 2510 of 2511 of 2512 of 2513 of 2514 of 2515 of 2516 of 2517 of 2518 of 2519 of 2520 of 2521 of 2522 of 2523 of 2524 of 2525 of 25
Page | of 1

OCESSING DIVISION -
LEG ey & REGULATIONS AER -[IK4 [210 AUG 1 2 281)
BRANCH,

As of: August 12, 2010

PUBLIC Status Posted,

SUBMISSION racking No. 80bscaie.
Comments Due: August 16, 2010)

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0053
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Annette Burchett
Address: IA

General Comment

See attached file(s)

Attachments

IRS-2010-0010-0053.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/12/2010


[August 9, 2010]

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCHO-9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to
Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. | specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

[Annette Burchett]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

RICHARD LONEY BOOZER,

Petitioner

v.

CRIMINAL DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF

COURT RECORDS ALLEGHENY COUNTY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 59 WM 2014

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29 th day of September, 2014, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED , and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or

Extraordinary Relief is DENIED

.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of 1 ~£G-I I,?<./l;) -)6 

AUG 2 0 

LEGAL PROCESSIN6DIVlSION 


PUBLICATION &, REGULATIONS 


BRANCH 
 As of: August 20, 2010 

Received: August 09, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 20, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2c666 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, :2010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-001O-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0203 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: Gary IVI. Guest 

Address: 

Bozeman, MT, 

General Comment 

See attached file( s) 

Attachments 

IRS-2010-0010-0203.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

https:llfdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency Icomponentl submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/20/2010 
August 9, 2010 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCII0-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-20 10­

0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grand fathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation ofthese 

regulations. 

Gary M. Guest DC 

2304 N. 7th. , Suite E, 

Bozeman, MT 59715
**FDA Medical Bulletin Archives:**
Summer 1999
*FINAL       ISSUE*
Summer 1998
Summer 1997
March 1997
October 1996
June 1996
January 1996
**REPORT SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS AND PRODUCT PROBLEMS    1-800-FDA-1088**FDA Home Page | Search     | A-Z Index | Site     Map | Contact FDA
FDA/Website Management Staff
#### ANNA MONTWID, PROSECUTOR, v. GRACE MONTWID AND JOSEPH SIEGLER, JUDGE OF JUVENILE AND DOMESTIC RELATIONS COURT OF ESSEX COUNTY, RESPONDENTS.

Argued January 18, 1933

Decided July 25, 1933.

Before Justices P aeree, Lloyd and Hehee.

Por the prosecutor, *Ghild & Shipman.*

Por the respondents, *Robert R. Eiernan.*

Per Curiam.

In this review we are asked to set aside an order of the Domestic Relations Court of Essex county requiring the prosecutor to pay $4 a week for the support of her grandchild.

*649The return of the writ discloses that the prosecutor upon the complaint of one Grace Montwid was required to make payment in the first instance of $6 per week, which sum was paid for a number of weeks when on application of the prosecutor the order was reduced to $4 per week.

The proceedings were taken in pursuance of the authority conferred by chapter *257*of the laws of 1929 establishing a Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court. The purpose of this statute, among others, is to protect the growing youth of the country which shall not have attained the age of sixteen years, and upon the court is conferred jurisdiction to deal with the domestic relations of such children and the responsibility for their care and support, and in doing so it is authorized to hear and determine these relations in summary manner in cases where the gravamen of the complaint is failure to provide support.

This the court, from the return, appears to have done in the present case. Tn the absence of invalidity appearing upon the return or otherwise properly presented to us, the order of the court below will not be disturbed upon legal grounds.

The testimony taken on the trial is not before us, although the prosecutor has presented in her brief excerpts from what purports to be a considerable amount of testimony taken at that time. If such testimony was presented and it was deemed essential it should have been made a part of the return. If, however, we are to examine this purported proof we think the court was justified in imposing the order which is sought to be reversed.

The contention of the prosecutor that under such cases as *Ackerman*v. *Ackerman, 55 N. J. L.*422; 27 *Atl. Rep.*807; no personal right for support arises under the poor laws of the state, and that consequently the Juvenile Court was without authority to impose an order at the instance of the complaining witness in the cause, is decided to the contrary in *Glassman*v. *Essex County,*9 *N. J. Mis. R.*519; 154 *Atl. Rep.*722.

The order is affirmed.
#### Ex Parte J. H. Overstreet.

No. 1509.

Decided June 15, 1898.

Habeas Corpus—Certificate to Transcript on Appeal.

Where a habeas corpus proceeding is heard and determined by the judge in vacation, the transcript for appeal from the judgment must be certified by said judge (Code of Criminal Procedure, article 916), and unless it is so certified the appeal will be dismissed.

Appeal from Wise County from a judgment rendered in vacation by the Hon. J. T. Johnson, County Judge, remanding relator to custody upon a habeas corpus proceeding.

Motion was made by the Assistant Attorney-General to dismiss the appeal because the transcript was not prepared in accordance with law.

Ho brief for relator.

*W. W. Walling*and *Mann Trice,*Assistant Attorney-General, for respondent.

DAVIDS OH, Judge.

The Assistant Attorney-General moves to dismiss this case because there is no proper transcript on file. The ground of the motion is predicated on the fact that the transcript is certified by the clerk, when it should have been certified by the judge. The habeas corpus proceeding, from which this is an appeal, was tried by the county judge, in vacation. When this is the case, under article 916 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the transcript must be certified by the judge who tried the cause. When the habeas corpus proceeding occurs in term time, it is certified by the clerk as other transcripts. Because the transcript is not certified by the judge as required by the statute, there is no ■proper record before us for our consideration, and the appeal is dismissed. See Ex Parte Malone, 35 Texas Crim. Rep., 297.

Appeal *dismissed.*
## Breadcrumb

-  National Minerals Information Center 

#           Metal Industry Indicators      

      By National Minerals Information Center

-  Home 
-  Commodities 
-  Countries 
-  Materials Flow 
-  US States 
-  NMIC Seminars 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  About 

The *Metal Industry Indicators* (*MII*) is a monthly newsletter that analyzes and forecasts the economic health of five metal industries: primary metals, steel, copper, primary aluminum, and aluminum mill products.

Composite leading and coincident indexes were developed under a cooperative agreement with the former Center for International Business Cycle Research (CIBCR) at Columbia University. The composite leading and coincident indexes are constructed with a set of indicators that historically have proven to lead or coincide with the major changes in these industries. Each month, these indexes are analyzed along with any economy-wide occurrences that would affect the metals industries. Historical data, spanning several decades, for the MII indexes are usually updated the third Friday of each month. A related publication, Nonmetallic Mineral Products Industry Indexes is also available.

***Note: this publication was discontinued in 2019; the most recent available are linked below.***

### MII Historical Data (XLS)

                            - July 16, 2019 update

### MII Monthly Newsletters (PDF)

                            - January 2019
                            - December 2018
                            - November 2018
                            - October 2018
                            - September 2018
                            - August 2018
                            - July 2018
                            - June 2018
                            - May 2018
                            - April 2018
                            - March 2018
                            - February 2018
                            - January 2018

### Contacts

####             Jeffrey Busse (Former Employee)          

##### Statistician

National Minerals Information Center
Sept. 25: U.S. Military Conducts Airstrikes Against ISIL in Iraq
 By U.S. Central Command News Release
  September 25, 2014 RELEASE #20140931FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **TAMPA, Fla., Sept. 25, 2014 -**
 U.S. military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Iraq, using
 a mix of attack, bomber and fighter aircraft to conduct eleven 
airstrikes Wednesday and today. One airstrike west of Irbil struck
 ISIL fighters and damaged an ISIL armed vehicle.  Five airstrikes south
 of Kirkuk struck ISIL fighters, destroyed an ISIL tank, an ISIL vehicle
 and an ISIL Humvee, and damaged two ISIL armed vehicles.  Five 
airstrikes west of Baghdad destroyed an ISIL Humvee, four checkpoints, a
 fighting position, two guard towers, and a command post. The strikes were conducted as part of the President's comprehensive strategy to degrade and destroy ISIL.
Sept. 23: U.S. Military Conducts Airstrikes Against ISIL in Iraq and Syria
 By U.S. Central Command News Release
  September 23, 2014 RELEASE #20140927FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **TAMPA, Fla., Sept. 23, 2014 -**
 U.S. military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Iraq and 
Syria, using a mix of bomber and remotely piloted aircraft to conduct 
three airstrikes last night and today. Two of the airstrikes were 
conducted last night as part of the operation over Syria and resulted in
 one damaged ISIL armed vehicle and one destroyed ISIL armed vehicle 
southwest of Dayr Az Zawr.  In addition, a third airstrike in Iraq today
 destroyed one ISIL armed vehicle northwest of Baghdad. All aircraft 
exited the strike areas safely. The strikes were conducted as part of the President's comprehensive strategy to degrade and destroy ISIL. To
 date, U.S. Central Command has conducted 194 airstrikes across Iraq 
against ISIL.  Along with partner nations, U.S. Central Command has also
 conducted 16 airstrikes across Syria against ISIL.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
COMARCO, Inc.

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
Nos. 33-42350, 33-37863, 33-44943, 33-45096, 33-50068, 33-63219, 333-1749,
333-78677, and 333-42350 on Forms S-8 of COMARCO, Inc. of our report dated March
15, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of COMARCO, Inc. and
Subsidiaries as of January 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders' equity, cash flows and comprehensive income
and the related schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended
January 31, 2001, which report appears in the January 31, 2001 annual report on
Form 10-K of COMARCO, Inc. and Subsidiaries.


                                                    KPMG LLP


Orange County, California
April 30, 2001