September 8, 2008

Mr. Mark Grundmann

Territory Sales Manager – Team Colorado

BASF

7734 Umber Court

Arvada, CO 80007

Bureau Veritas Project No. 10008-008141.00

Subject: Isocyanate Air Monitoring Survey Report

Dear Mr. Grundmann:

Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. (Bureau Veritas) is pleased to provide the attached report for 

the industrial hygiene assessment conducted for methylene bisphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) and 

isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI) at the parking garage located at 13th Street and Speer Avenue in 

Denver, Colorado. The subject assessment was performed on July 23 and 24, 2008.

Bureau Veritas appreciates the assistance and support of all of the individuals involved in this 

survey. It has been a pleasure to serve BASF on this project. We would welcome the 

opportunity to work with you again on future projects. Please call any one of us at 303.988.2585 if 

you have any questions, comments, or need additional information.

Sincerely,

Amy E. McGovern Ronald H. Hill, MSPH, CIH, CSP

Senior Project Manager Manager, Occupational Health and Safety

Denver Regional Office Denver Regional Office

Attachments: Industrial Hygiene Assessment Report 

cc: Don Starke, BASF Team Colorado
INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSESSMENT 

REPORT

Parking Garage Located at

13th Street and Speer Avenue

Denver, Colorado

Prepared For:

BASF

7737 Umber Court

Arvada, Colorado

Bureau Veritas Project No: 10008-008141.00

September 8, 2008

Statement of Confidentiality:

Please be advised that the content of the 

attached report contains proprietary 

information and is confidential. The 

report is intended for the recipient’s use 

and review only. This document shall not 

be used in any other manner without the 

express written consent of Bureau

Veritas, Inc.

Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.

165 South Union Boulevard

Suite 310

Lakewood, Colorado 80228

303-988-2585

www.us.bureauveritas.com
Table of Contents

Section Page

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................................. i

1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1

1.1 PROCESS DESCRIPTION.................................................................................................................. 1

2.0 STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES................................................................................................ 2

3.0 METHODS AND MATERIALS...................................................................................................... 3

3.1. AIRMONITORING............................................................................................................................. 3

4.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION...................................................................................................... 3

4.1. PERSONAL MONITORING................................................................................................................. 3

5.0 CONCLUSIONS & Recommendations...................................................................................... 5

Appendix

A Lab Results
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Mr. Mark Grundmann, Territory Sales Manager for BASF Team Colorado, requested that Bureau 

Veritas conduct an industrial hygiene survey for methylene bisphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) and 

isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI) during the application of various BASF products on the top floor of 

a parking garage located at 13th Street and Speer Avenue in Denver, Colorado. BASF is the

manufacturer of this waterproofing sealant material, and requested this survey to characterize 

airborne concentrations of MDI and IPDI during the mixing application of the coating material. 

The scope of services provided by Bureau Veritas was described in our Proposal No.

1003.08.289 dated July 17, 2008 and Change Order No. 1003.08.308 dated August 1, 2008, 

which included an explanation of the terms and conditions under which the work was performed.

On July 23, 2008, Bureau Veritas collected four 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) personal 

samples to determine worker exposures to MDI and IPDI for three employees either applying or 

mixing the coating product. Two products were applied during the shift. Conipur 78 (which 

contains 30 to 70 percent MDI) was applied in the morning. Conipur 265Z (which contains 10 to

30 percent IPDI) was applied in the afternoon. In addition, Bureau Veritas collected two shortterm exposure limit (STEL) samples during mixing and application tasks. All of the work was 

conducted on the top floor of the parking garage that is located outdoors. Industrial size fans were

operating at the application site and the mixing site during the work and the employees worked

upwind to minimize their exposures.

On July 24, 2008, Bureau Veritas collected two 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) personal 

samples to determine worker exposures to MDI for two employees either applying or mixing the 

coating product. One product was applied during the shift. Conipur 275 (which contains 30 to 70 

percent MDI) was applied in the morning and in the afternoon. In addition, Bureau Veritas 

collected two short-term exposure limit (STEL) samples during mixing and application tasks.

Personal exposure results on July 23 and 24, 2003 were below the American Conference of 

Governmental Industrial Hygienist (ACGIH) Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) guidelines of 0.005 

parts per million (ppm) for both MDI and IPDI. In addition, all STEL and TWA samples were 

below the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) ceiling limit of 0.02 ppm for 

MDI. OSHA does not have an established 8-hour TWA Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) for MDI 

or IPDI. In addition, OSHA does not have an established short-term exposure limit (STEL) or 

ceiling concentrations for IPDI.

With regard to the sampling results, Bureau Veritas recommends the following:

1. Feasible engineering controls, such as the fans or other ventilation, and work practice

controls, such as employees working upwind of the airflow, should be used when preparing 

and applying this product to reduce employee exposures to levels at or below the applicable 

exposure limits.

2. If engineering and work practice controls are not feasible or are not effective for reducing 

worker exposures to levels at or below the applicable OSHA exposure limits, respiratory 

protection must be worn.

3. Determine personal exposures for use of this material in areas that are indoors or otherwise

enclosed, it is recommended that additional air monitoring be conducted since the survey 

results reported here are not representative of indoor or enclosed conditions.

i
1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Mr. Mark Grundmann, Territory Sales Manager for BASF – Team Colorado, requested that 

Bureau Veritas conduct an industrial hygiene survey for methylene bisphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) 

and isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI) during the mixing and application of various Conipur Coatings 

on the top floor of a parking garage located at 13th Street and Speer Avenue in Denver, Colorado.

BASF is the manufacturer of the coating material, and requested this survey to characterize 

airborne concentrations of isocyanates during the mixing and application of the coating material. 

BASF may use the results of this survey to advise product users on proper use and handling of 

this material. The scope of services provided by Bureau Veritas was described in our Proposal 

No. 1003.08.289 dated July 17, 2008 and Change Order No. 1003.08.308 dated August 1, 2008, 

which included an explanation of the terms and conditions under which the work was performed.

Ms. Amy McGovern, Senior Project Manager performed the subject assessment on July 23 and

24, 2008.

The air monitoring survey consisted of the following:

3⁄4 Collected and analyzed (using OSHA Method 47) six (6) personal time-weighted average

(TWA) air samples on employees applying coating to a parking garage for MDI and IPDI.

3⁄4 Collected and analyzed (using OSHA Method 47) four (4) personal short-term exposure limit

(STEL) air samples on employees applying coating to a parking garage for MDI and IPDI.

3⁄4 Prepared and submitted field blanks for quality control purposes for MDI and IPDI.

3⁄4 Prepared a written report documenting Bureau Veritas’ evaluation.

Appendix A, Lab Results supplement the results of the industrial hygiene assessment discussed 

in this report.

1.1 PROCESS DESCRIPTION

During the monitoring period on July 23, 2008 Conipur Deck Coating Primer 78 was mixed and 

applied from 0900 – 1200 and Conipur 265Z Coating was mixed and applied from 1300 – 1600 to 

the top floor of the parking garage located 13th Street and Speer Avenue in Denver, Colorado. 

This floor was located outdoors. On July 24, 2008, Conipur 275 was mixed and applied to the top

floor of the above referenced parking garage during both the morning and afternoon shift. The 

tasks involved in this operation included the following:

1) Poured 5 gallons of material from the original container into a 5-gallon bucket.

2) Mixed the product using a powered mixer attachment on a corded drill.

3) Poured the chemical over the parking pavement directly from the 5-gallon bucket.
2

4) After sealant material was poured onto the pavement, a squeegee tool was used to evenly 

apply the sealant.

5) Spread out the chemical even further using a roller tool.

6) Applied sand to coat the surface using a blower tool, referred to as “seeding.” This was 

performed during the afternoon samples on July 24, 2008, only.

This sequence of tasks was repeated until the pre-measured parking area was covered.

The workers conducting the above tasks wore 3M full-face respirators with 3M 6001 organic 

vapor cartridges, heavy work gloves, hardhats, and work boots containing anti-slip cleats.

Although the total time required to conduct this work including preparation time and clean-up time 

was more than eight hours, the employees were exposed to the various sealant materials for 

approximately seven to eight hours.

On July 23, 2008, outdoor temperature ranged between approximately 75° F in the morning to

98° F in the afternoon. Conditions were dry in the morning. In the afternoon, slight drizzle fell 

from approximately 1500 until 1600. There was an approximate wind speed between 10 and 15 

mph throughout the work shift. On July 24, 2008, outdoor temperatures ranged from 75° F in the 

morning to 98° F in the afternoon. Conditions were dry throughout the day and the wind speed 

was between 10 and 15 mph throughout the work shift.

2.0 STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES

Employers using BASF Conipur products are subject to the requirements of the Occupational 

Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). OSHA has not set 8-hour TWA Permissible Exposure 

Limits (PELs) for MDI or IPDI. A Short-Term Exposure Limit (STEL), expressed as a ceiling 

concentration has been set for MDI, but not IPDI. The STEL is a 15-minute TWA exposure, 

which should not be exceeded at any time during the workday, even if the 8-hour TWA is below 

the TLV-TWA. A ceiling concentration is an exposure limit that should not be exceeded at any 

time during the work shift. The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists 

(ACGIH) has set a recommended 8-hour TWA Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) for both MDI and 

IPDI.

ACGIH-TLVs are not legally binding regulations; rather, they are consensus standards. Table 1 

below presents the OSHA and ACGIH exposure limits.
3

Table 1

OSHA and ACGIH Exposure Limits

Substance

OSHA Limit ACGIH TLV

8-hour TWA

Methylene bisphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) 0.02 ppm (C) 0.005 ppm

Isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI) NE 0.005 ppm

Notes for Table 1.

OSHA Occupational Safety and

Health Administration

ACGIH American Conference of 

Governmental Industrial 

Hygienists

C Ceiling Limit (not to be 

exceeded at any time during 

the work shift)

ppm Parts per million parts of air (by 

volume)

TLV Threshold Limit Value NE Not Established

TWA Time-Weighted Average

(8-hour basis)

3.0 METHODS AND MATERIALS

3.1. AIR MONITORING

Bureau Veritas used portable battery-powered sampling pumps to collect personal samples for 

MDI and IPDI. Each sample was collected by passing calibrated flow rates of air through a 

specified media as determined by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)

method 42/47. Each sampling pump flow rate was determined using a Bios DryCal

® DC-Lite

calibrator before and after the monitoring sessions. These measurements and the sampling time 

were used to calculate the final volume of air that was collected for each sample.

OSHA Sampling and Analytical Method 42/47 for isocyanates was followed. Air samples

collected during this study were analyzed by the Bureau Veritas Novi, Michigan Laboratory, which 

is accredited by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA). To review the scope of 

accreditation, visit the accreditation organization website at www.aiha.org.

4.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1. PERSONAL MONITORING

The personal air sampling results for the isocyanates air monitoring conducted by Bureau Veritas 

on July 23 and 24, 2008 are presented in Table 2.
4

Table 2. Personal Air Monitoring Results for Isocyanates

Employee Name

Job Description Sample Number Sample Duration(minutes)

BASF Product and

Chemical Analyzed

Measured Exposure

Result (ppm)

July 23, 2008

Jose Luis, Mixer TWA-1 191 Conipur 78

MDI 0.0045

Miriano Biartolo, 

Application

TWA-2 178

Conipur 78

MDI

<0.00010

Oscar Hernandez, 

Application

TWA-3 173 Conipur 265Z 

IPDI <0.00030

Jose Luis, Mixer TWA-4 180 Conipur 265Z 

IPDI 0.00031

Jose Luis, Mixer STEL-1 15 Conipur 78

MDI <0.0013

Miriano Biartolo,

Mixing, application 

and pouring 

chemical

STEL-2 15 Conipur 78

MDI <0.0013

July 24, 2008

Jose Luis, Mixer TWA-1A 237 Conipur 275

MDI <0.000083

Oscar Hernandez, 

Application

TWA-2A 238 Conipur 275

MDI <0.000080

Jose Luis, Mixer STEL-3 15 Conipur 275

MDI <0.0012

Dave Hotchkiss, 

Application with

squeegee

STEL-4 15 Conipur 275

MDI <0.0012

072308-B Field blank --- MDI <0.2 μg

072408-B Field blank --- IPDI <0.5 μg

MDI = Methylene bisphenyl diisocyanate

IPDI = Isophorone diisocyanate

μg = micrograms

ppm = parts per million
5

All personal exposures to MDI and IPDI over the duration of the sealant mixing and application 

tasks were below the applicable ACGIH guideline of 0.005 ppm as an 8-hour TWA for both MDI 

and IPDI. OSHA has not established any exposure limits for IPDI; however, OSHA has 

established a ceiling exposure limit of 0.02 ppm for MDI. If the tasks monitored during this survey 

had been conducted over the duration of an 8-hour workday, 8-hour TWA exposures would be 

consistent with the measured exposures presented in the table above.

The exposures for the four short-term samples collected over the course of the two work shifts 

were below the OSHA ceiling limit of 0.02 ppm for MDI.

All of the personal air samples were collected outdoors in the open environment, under wind 

conditions of approximately 10 - 15 mph. It is likely that air concentrations of MDI and IPDI would 

be higher if these operations were conducted in an enclosed environment, or under still wind 

conditions, such as in areas inside of a parking lot, especially in sub-ground levels.

Engineering controls in place during the monitoring included two industrial size stationary fans 

operating at the application site. One industrial size stationary fan was present and operating at 

the mixing station. The stationary fans created a cross-breeze and employees were observed 

working upwind of the fans.

5.0 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS

Personal exposure results on July 23 and 24, 2003 were below the ACGIH TLV guidelines of

0.005 parts per million (ppm) for both MDI and IPDI. In addition, all STEL and TWA samples 

were below the OSHA ceiling limit of 0.02 ppm for MDI. OSHA does not have an established 8-

hour TWA for MDI or IPDI. In addition, OSHA does not have an established STEL or ceiling 

concentrations for IPDI.

With regard to the sampling results, Bureau Veritas recommends the following:

1. Feasible engineering controls, such as the fans or other ventilation, and work practice 

controls, such as employees working upwind of the airflow, should be used when preparing 

and applying this product to reduce employee exposures to levels at or below the applicable 

exposure limits.

2. If engineering and work practice controls are not feasible or are not effective for reducing 

worker exposures to levels at or below the applicable OSHA exposure limits, respiratory 

protection must be worn.
6

3. Determine personal exposures for use of this material in areas that are indoors or otherwise 

enclosed, it is recommended that additional air monitoring be conducted since the survey 

results reported here are not representative of indoor or enclosed conditions.

Report prepared by: Report reviewed by:

Amy E. McGovern Lisa S. Barnes, CIH, PE 

Senior Project Manager Senior Project Manager 

Denver Regional Office Denver Regional Office
7

APPENDIX A

ANALYTICAL LABORATORY REPORT
I

August 01, 2008

Amy McGovern

BUREAU VERITAS- DENVER

165 South Union Boulevard

Suite 310

Lakewood, CO 80228-

Bureau Veritas Work Order No. 08071185

Reference: 10008-008141.00/ 

Dear Amy McGovern:

Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. received 12 samples on 7/29/2008 for the analyses 

presented in the following report.

Enclosed is a copy of the Chain-of-Custody record, acknowledging receipt of these 

samples. Please note that any unused portion of the samples will be discarded 30 days 

after the date of this report, unless you have requested otherwise.

This material is confidential and is intended solely for the person to whom it is 

addressed. If this is received in error, please contact the number provided below.

We appreciate the opportunity to assist you. If you have any questions concerning this 

report, please contact a Client Services Representative at (800) 806-5887.

Sincerely,

Karen Coonan

Client Services Representative

cc:

Bureau Veritas North America,

22345 Roerhel Drive

Novi, MI 48375

Main: (248) 344.1770

Fax: (248) 344.2655 

www.us.bureauveritas.com
1 I 6

CASE NARRATIVE Date: 01-Aug-08

Client: BUREAU VERITAS- DENVER

Project: 10008-008141.00/

Work Order No 08071185

Unless otherwise noted below, all quality control results associated with this sample set were within 

acceptable limits and/or do not adversely affect the reported results.

Unless otherwise indicated below, the industrial hygiene results have not been blank corrected.
ANALYTICAL RESULTS Date: 01-Aug-08

Client:

Project:

BUREAU VERITAS- DENVER

10008-008141.00/ Work Order No: 08071185

2/6

)

)

Sample Identification: TWA-1

Lab Number: OOlA Date Sampled: 7/23/2008

Sample Type

Analyst

GFPP Filter

AED

Date Received: 7/29/2008

Air Volume (L): 198.64

Analyte (/-lg)

Analytical Results Reporting

Limit

(ppm) (/-lg)

Test

Method

Date

Analyzed

Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate

(MDI)

9.1 0. . 046 0.0045 0..2 OSHA 42 I 47 0713012008

Sample Identification: TWA-2

Lab Number: 002A Date Sampled: 7/23/2008

Sample Type

Analyst

GFPP Filter

AED

Date Received: 7/29/2008

Air Volume (L): 188.68

Analytical Results Reporting

Limit Test Date

Analyte (/-lg) (mglm3 (ppm) (/-lg) Method Analyzed

Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate

(MDI)

<0.2 <0.. 0011 <0 00010 0.2 OSHA 42 I 47 0713012008

Sample Identification: STEL-l

Lab Number: 003A Date Sampled: 7/23/2008

Sample Type

Analyst

GFPP Filter

AED

Date Received: 7/29/2008

Air Volume (L): 15.38

Analytical Results Reporting

Limit Test Date

Analyte

-----------

(/-lg) (mg/m3 (ppm) (/-lg) Method Analyzed

Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate

(MDI)

<0.2 <0 013 <0.0013 0.2 OSHA 42 I 47 07/3012008
ANALYTICAL RESULTS Date: 01-Aug-08

Client:

Project:

BUREAU VERITAS- DENVER

10008-008141.00/ Work Order No: 08071185

Sample Identification:

Lab Number: 

Sample Type

STEL-2

004A

GFPP Filter

Date Sampled: 7/23/2008

Date Received: 7/29/2008

316

Analyst AED Air Volume (L): 15.38

Analyte (!lg)

Analytical Results Reporting

Limit

(ppm) (!lg)

Test

Method

Date

Analyzed

Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate

(MDI)

<0.2 <0.. 013 <0.0013 0.2 OSHA 42 I 47 0713012008

Sample Identification: STEL-3

Lab Number: 005A Date Sampled: 7/24/2008

Sample Type

Analyst

GFPP Filter

AED

Date Received: 7/29/2008

Air Volume (L): 16.13

Analytical Results Reporting

Limit Test Date

Analyte (!lg) (mglm3

) (ppm) (!lg) Method Analyzed

Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate

(MDI)

<0..2 <0.. 012 <0.. 0012 0..2 OSHA 42 I 47 0713012008

Sample Identification: STEL-4

Lab Number: 006A Date Sampled: 7/24/2008

Sample Type

Analyst

GFPP Filter

AED

Date Received: 7/29/2008

Air Volume (L): 16.13

Analytical Results Reporting

Limit Test Date

Analyte (!lg) (ppm) (!lg) Method Analyzed

Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate

(MDI)

<0.2 <0.. 012 <0.0012 0..2 OSHA 42 I 47 0713012008
ANALYTICAL RESULTS Date: 01-Aug-08

Client:

Project:

BUREAU VERITAS- DENVER

10008-008141.00/ Work Order No: 08071185

Sample Identification:

Lab Number: 

Sample Type

TWA-3

007A

GFPP Filter

Date Sampled: 7/23/2008

Date Received: 7/29/2008

4/6

)

)

Analyst AED

Analyte (J.tg)

Analytical Results Reporting

Limit

(mg/m3) (ppm) (J.tg)

Air Volume (L): 184.25

Test Date

Method Analyzed

Isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI) <0.5 <0.. 0027 <0. . 00030 0.. 5 OSHA 42 I 47 0713012008

Sample Identification: TWA-4

Lab Number: 008A Date Sampled: 7/23/2008

Sample Type

Analyst

GFPP Filter

AED

Date Received: 7/29/2008

Air Volume (L): 190.62

Analytical Results Reporting

Limit Test Date

Analyte (Jlg) (mglm3 (ppm) (Jlg) Method Analyzed

Isophorone diisocyanate (IPDJ) 0.54 0.. 0028 0.00031 0.5 OSHA 42 I 47 07130/2008

Sample Identification: TWA-1A

Lab Number: 009A Date Sampled: 7/24/2008

Sample Type

Analyst

GFPP Filter

AED

Analyte

Analytical Results Reporting

Limit

(J.lg) (mg/m3 (ppm) (Jlg)

Date Received: 7/29/2008

Air Volume (L): 235.29

Test Date

Method Analyzed

Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate

(MDI)

<0..2 <0.. 00085 <0. . 000083 0.2 OSHA 42 I 47 07130/2008
ANALYTICAL RESULTS Date: 01-Aug-08

Client:

Project:

BUREAU VERITAS- DENVER

10008-008141.00/ Work Order No: 08071185

Sample Identification: TWA-2A

Lab Number:

Sample Type

010A

GFPP Filter

Date Sampled: 7/24/2008

Date Received: 7/29/2008

516

)

Analyst AED

Analyte

Analytical Results Reporting

Limit

(mglm3) (ppm) (f.lg)

Air Volume (L): 242.76

Test Date

Method Analyzed

Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate

(MDI)

<0..2 <0. 00082 <0 000080 0..2 OSHA 42 I 47 0713012008

Sample Identification: 072308-B BLANK

Lab Number: 011A Date Sampled: 7/23/2008

Sample Type

Analyst

GFPP Filter

AED

Date Received: 7/29/2008

Air Volume (L): NA

Analytical Results Reporting

Limit Test Date

Analyte (f.!g) (mglm3 (ppm) (f.!g) Method Analyzed

Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate

(MDI)

<0..2 0.2 OSHA 42 I 47 0713012008

Sample Identification: 072408-B BLANK

Lab Number: 012A Date Sampled: 7/24/2008

Sample Type

Analyst

GFPP Filter

AED

Date Received: 7/29/2008

Air Volume (L): NA

Analytical Results Reporting

Limit Test Date

Analyte (f.lg) (mglm3

) (ppm) (f.lg) Method Analyzed

Isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI) <0.5 0..5 OSHA 42 I 47 0713012008
ANALYTICAL RESULTS Date: 01-Aug-08

Client:

Project:

BUREAU VERITAS- DENVER

10008-008141.00/ Work Order No: 08071185

General Notes:

<: Less than the indicated reporting limit (RL)

616

--: Information not available or not applicable.

Back sections (if applicable) were checked and showed no significant breakthrough unless otherwise noted
s

s:::

BUREAU

Bureau Veritas rorth America,Inc.

INTERDEPARTMIENTAL INTERNAL

CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY

Page_l_of

For Bureau Veritas Use Only

Project No.

0

[] Fee Schedule Price

[J Discount Price

off list _

Send Report to:

0 Client 0 Internal Office

Send Via:

0 Reg. Mail 0 Overnight Mail

[J Email

[] SpecialPrice Attached 0 Fax Fax 

SpecialInstructions: Q)

s:::

0

()

0

Soil Samples Only: Which state are these from? \,,..;., t"'" L:::I"T ·'' 2)

ANALYSIS REQUESTED

(Enter an 'X' in the box below to indicate request. Enter a 'P' if Preservative added.*)

FOR LAB 

USE ONLY

Accompany Request)

Please return completed form and samples to one of the Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. locations below: 

Detroit Lab: (800) 806-5887

Atlanta Lab: (800) 252-9919

Distribution:

White & Yellow: Lab

Pink: Consultant
Bureau Veritas N'orth America, Inc.

INTERDEPARTMIENTAL INTERNAL 

CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY Date !Results Requested: _ 

Rush Charges Authorized? DYes DNo

Page of

For Bureau Veritas Use Only

Project No.

(""1: ee SchedulePrice 

tPrice

off list _

[J Special Price Attached

Send Report to:

D Client [] Internal Office

Send Via:

D Reg. Mail D Overnight Mail

D Email

D Fax Fax 

Special Instructions:

Soil Samples Only:Which state are these from?

CLIENT SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION

Q)

c

'

c

iii

0

()

0

"Q'")

..Q

E

:I

z

ANALYSIS REQUESTED

(Enter an 'X' in the box below to indicate request. Enter a 'P' if Preservative added.*)

FOR LAB

USE ONLY

't-.

(Client Signature MUST Accompany Request)

Please return completed form and samples to one of the Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. locations below: 

Detroit Lab: (800) 806-5887

Atlanta Lab: (800) 252-9919

Distribution:

White & Yellow: Lab

Pink: Consultant