alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CENTCOM hosts open house for families

/ Published April 25, 2014

**MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. –** U.S. Central Command leaders opened the doors to the headquarters April 18 to host the families of USCENTCOM during the first ever Family Open House.

The event, which drew more than 1,300 family members, gave families the opportunity to find out more about the contributions their USCENTCOM member makes to the command and learn more about the USCENTCOM mission and the complexity of the area of responsibility. Additionally the event gave senior leaders a chance to thank family members for their support to their sponsors who work at USCENTCOM by giving them an unclassified look at how the command operates. 

The event kicked off with members taking their families to see their workspaces followed by a brief from their directorate senior leaders.   During that time, directors introduced themselves and explained their department’s role within the command. 

After directorate briefs, USCENTCOM members gave their families self-paced tours of the building pointing out some of the highlights including the wall featuring all the Medal of Honor recipients from battles that took place in the command’s AOR, and the Joint Operations Center, or JOC, where joint staff members provide timely, accurate and actionable information to the commander and component commanders.  

Interactive static displays included small-arms weapons, non-lethal weapons, media briefing and night-vision goggles were set up around the facility.  One of the popular displays was a baton training demonstration that gave kids the opportunity to test their training baton wielding skills on an instructor wearing protective equipment. “It was cool to hit the guy wearing red with the stick,” said 7-year-old Isaiah Hooks.  

In addition to the static displays, Vice Adm. Mark Fox, deputy commander, and Army Maj. Gen. Michael Garrett, chief of staff, gave area of responsibility briefs to the families to better explain the role of the command. 

“Although USCENTCOM is the smallest of the geographic combatant commands, this is where most of the action is happening,” said Vice Adm. Fox during his brief. 

At the conclusion of the event, several spouses and children said it helped them better understand their sponsor’s role at the command and the USCENTCOM mission.  

“I appreciate the opportunity to come to where my husband works and learn more about CENTCOM,” said Blanca Perez, wife of Gunnery Sgt. Roque Perez, who works with USCENTCOM’s Special Security Office.  “It was nice generals to invite us [families] to the headquarters and explain to us how this place works.  I feel much more comfortable that families aren’t forgotten here.”
#### § 593.1 Scope.

This part establishes procedures under section 108(c) of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act, as amended (15 U.S.C. 1397(c)), for making determinations whether a vehicle that was not originally manufactured to conform with all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards, and is not otherwise eligible for importation under part 591 of this chapter, may be imported into the United States because it can be modified to meet the Federal standards.
From: JSHAYES44@aol.com [mailto:JSHAYES44@aol.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 7:02 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: keep your hands off our retirement

it has been well documented that the government cannot even run social security. I certainly do 

not want you taking over my retirement account. you give benefits to people who have never 

paid into the system and now are wanting to give illegals compensation. keep your hands off our 

retirement accounts! 

 

j.s. hayes
----

Action brought on 30 January 2004 by Athinaiki Oikogeniaki Artopoiia A.V.E.E. (S.A.) against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

(Case T-35/04)

(2004/C 94/130)

Language of the case: to be determined pursuant to article 131(2) of the Rules of Procedure language in which the case was submitted: English

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 30 January 2004 by Athinaiki Oikogeniaki Artopoiia A.V.E.E. (S.A.), Pikermi, Attica, Greece, represented by Dr C. Chrissanthis, lawyer.

Ferrero oHG mbH was also a party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

----
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 88 Agreed to House (ATH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 88

 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 2001

Mr. Frost submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, 
elected to the following standing committees of the House of 
Representatives:
    Committee on Agriculture: 
            (1) Mr. Lucas of Kentucky to rank immediately after Mr. 
        Phelps.
            (2) Mr. Kind and Mr. Shows to rank immediately after Mr. 
        Acevedo-Vila.
    Committee on the Budget: Mr. Matheson.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OFALASKA, Plaintiff, and ALASKA FORESTASSOCIATION, 

### et al. Intervenor-Plaintiffs,


### v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 

### et al., Defendants and SOUTHEAST ALASKA CONSERVATION

. COUNCIL, 

### et al., Intervenor-Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Case No. 11-1122 (RJL) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
ORDER 

# s+- (March'21 , 2013) [Dkts. ##45, 46]

### ~~ For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered

## this~ day of March 2013, it is hereby ORDERED that the federal defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. #45] is GRANTED; and it is further

1ORDEREDthat the intervenor defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. #46] is DENIED as MOOT. ORDEREDthat the above-captioned case is DISMISSED withprejudice.
SO ORDERED.

2
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I,MichaelH. Owens, M.D., the President and Chief Executive Officer of iVOW, Inc.(the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(a) theQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscalquarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| Date:  May 16, 2005               |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                   |   |
|                                   |   |
| /s/ Michael H. Owens, M.D.             |   |
| Michael H. Owens, M.D.                 |   |
| Chief Executive Officer and  President |   |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to iVOW, Inc. and will beretained by iVOW, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission upon request.

 

----
From: Carter, Debbie A [mailto:Debbie.Carter@USONCOLOGY.COM] 

Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 8:43 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: government takeover of my 401(k) and IRAs

To every American, 

The last time I checked, I still live in the United States of America and stealing was against the 

law. The foolish idea that the government can take my money on a “promise” that they will take 

care of me when I am retired is insane. 

I started investing in my 401(k) and IRAs because the writing was on the wall that the government 

had taken my social security money. I reserve the word stolen on this topic because the 

government continues to promise to give my money back to me starting in 6 years when I am 

supposed to be able to start collecting my money. We will see. My point being, I started saving 

because it was obvious that there will be more people retired in 2019 than dollars in social 

security to distribute. Now, you want to take my 401(k) and IRAs!!!!! 

I have always paid my bills, saved, and, by the grace of God, tried to be a responsible citizen. I 

have lived conservatively because I understand that there will be a day when I can no longer 

work for an income and will need money to survive. It is terrifying to hear that the government is 

planning to take the very money I have earned and saved. 

I beg you, Stop the spending. Stop supporting irresponsible people and illegal immigrants. Stop 

padding your pockets with my money. 

May God have mercy on the souls of those who think that taking citizens’ 401(k)s and IRAs and I 

can only assume eventually our savings is the right thing to do. 

Debbie Carter 

The contents of this electronic mail message and any attachments are confidential, 

possibly privileged and intended for the addressee(s) only. 

Only the addressee(s) may read, disseminate, retain or otherwise use this message. If 

received in error, please immediately inform the sender and then delete this message 

without disclosing its contents to anyone.
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U. S.
      C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Sentex Sensing Technology, Inc., (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending November 30, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      William R. Sprow, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U. S. C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that:





1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
      William R. Sprow





William
      R. Sprow


Chief
      Financial Officer


March
      14,
      2007
U.S. Navy in Middle East Seizes $39 Million in Drugs
 
  By Commander U.S. Naval Forces Central Command Public Affairs |
  A U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyer seized 640 kilograms of methamphetamine worth $39 million from a fishing vessel while patrolling international waters in the Gulf of Oman, May 15-16.
A U.S. Coast Guard interdiction team from USS Momsen (DDG 92) discovered the illegal narcotics during a flag verification boarding in accordance with international law. The confiscated drugs and fishing vessel remain in U.S. custody.
The vessel’s nine crew members identified themselves as Iranian nationals and will be transferred to a regional nation for repatriation.
Momsen was operating in support of Combined Task Force (CTF) 150, one of four task forces under the Combined Maritime Forces. The international naval force has increased regional patrols to locate and disrupt unlawful maritime activity.
The vessel was interdicted while transiting international waters along a route historically used by criminal organizations to smuggle people, weapons, narcotics and charcoal. Crew members attempted to discard more than 60 bales of the seized drugs as Momsen approached.
CTF 150 has conducted nine successful drug seizures in 2022, resulting in the confiscation of heroin, methamphetamine, amphetamine pills and hashish worth a combined value of $130 million.
Combined Maritime Forces is the largest multinational naval partnership in the world. The organization includes 34 nations and is headquartered in Bahrain with U.S. Naval Forces Central Command and U.S. 5th Fleet.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 85

Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 8, 2001

Mr. PORTMAN submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating majority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following named Member be, and

2 he is hereby, elected to the following standing committee

3 of the House of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRA5 STRUCTURE: Mr. Pombo shall rank immediately after Mr.

6 Moran of Kansas.

Æ
SJVUAPCD 4301 - 1 12/17/92

RULE 4301 FUEL BURNING EQUIPMENT (Adopted May 21, 1992, Amended December

17, 1992)

1.0 Purpose

The purpose of this rule is to limit the emission of air contaminants from fuel burning

equipment. This rule limits the concentration of combustion contaminants and specifies

maximum emission rates for sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and combustion contaminant

emissions.

2.0 Applicability

The provisions of this rule shall apply to any fuel burning equipment except air pollution

control equipment which is exempted according to Section 4.0. 

3.0 Definitions

3.1 Fuel Burning Equipment: any furnace, boiler, apparatus, stack, and all

appurtenances thereto, used in the process of burning fuel for the primary purpose

of producing heat or power by indirect heat transfer.

3.2 Fuel Burning Unit: the minimum number of fuel burning equipment, the

simultaneous operations of which are required for the production of useful heat or

power.

4.0 Exemptions

4.1 Fuel burning equipment serving primarily as air pollution control equipment by

using a combustion process to destroy air contaminants shall be exempt from the

provisions of this rule.

5.0 Requirements

5.1 A person shall not discharge into the atmosphere combustion contaminants

exceeding in concentration at the point of discharge, 0.1 grain per cubic foot of

gas calculated to 12% of carbon dioxide at dry standard conditions.

5.2 A person shall not build, erect, install or expand any non-mobile fuel burning

equipment unit unless the discharge into the atmosphere of contaminants will not

and does not exceed any one (1) or more of the following rates:

5.2.1 200 pounds per hour of sulfur compounds, calculated as sulfur dioxide

(SO2);
SJVUAPCD 4301 - 2 12/17/92

5.2.2 140 pounds per hour of nitrogen oxides, calculated as nitrogen dioxide

(NO2);

5.2.3 Ten (10) pounds per hour of combustion contaminants as defined in Rule

1020 (Definitions) and derived from the fuel.

5.3 Nothing in this rule shall be construed as preventing the maintenance or

preventing the alteration or modification of an existing fuel burning equipment

unit which will reduce its mass rate of air contaminant emissions.

6.0 Test Methods

The following test methods shall be used to determine compliance with the requirements

of section 5.0:

5.1 Particulate matter concentration - EPA Method 5;

5.2 Carbon dioxide concentration - ARB Method 100;

5.3 Oxides of nitrogen concentration - ARB Method 100;

5.4 Sulfur compounds concentration - EPA Method 8 or ARB Method 8;

5.5 Stack gas velocity - EPA Method 2;

5.6 Stack gas moisture - EPA Method 4.
Port Everglades Energy Center

Flajole, Andy to: Andrew Parks 11/02/2012 04:29 PM

Cc: Audra Livergood, "Foster, Stacy" , "Tammaro, Michael",

"Raffenberg, Matthew"

Hi Andrew,

Please see attached FPL’s Response to the Request for Additional Information on the Biological

Assessment associated with the Greenhouse Gas permit application for the Port Everglades Energy

Center project. FPL has provided both Adobe and Word versions of the responses per Audra’s guidance,

and developed additional figures as necessary that are also attached for your review. We look forward

to discussing our responses with you and Audra next Friday.

Please call me if you have any questions, and have a great weekend.

Thank You,



# Andy Flajole

Environmental Services

(561) 691

‐ 2766

PEEC_Biological Assessment_2012_Rev 1_FPL Responses 11-2-12.pdf.pd f PEEC_Biological Assessment_2012_Rev Responses 11-2-12.pdf.pd FPL 40.jpg.jpg

FPL114 and FPL 120.pdf.pd f 120.pdf.pd 113-87618G003 VELOCITIES.pdf.pd f

PEEC_Biological Assessment_2012_Rev 1_FPL Responses 11-2-12.doc.doc
! "!  # "  $


% &'!  
 # !  $

( "" )***+)", 

- ./ 0
1

.! 	 & ++)02


	        	!" #"$ %& 

 %& " "
&     	' 

('  (")   " )	)  

*	"  $ 	" 
+,,,-+*

&  #  	

-# -
# ,# !  34-# -
#56# -# -
#  ,# 34


 ,#56 '#  !  
 ! !   
 - - # #  (

-/ # 7/	8!  # 8! 	9	# - - ! 

 3 "" )***+)", 6	'
#   0	

  2 ,#9:00    # ; ! < 



 '$## #$	-# -
# '' 
 /' ' ' ## 


 	' # 
 #   ) $

 		 
 
  

 
 	-# -
#< 0+
 

  '$# 

 	# 

/! 	 # $	'$ $	 	/

! #   # ! 	# "=  # # 7
 	!  
 
 ! 

' > 
 $ ! ? ; 
! 
$ !   ; 2
 ' 
 ,#-$ 8$> 

 -# -
# 

  
 

  
 #   

 " 	; ! < 



 @ -# -
# $    '  
 

  ! !  

!    
 1  
 ' ; 
 $    ; ! < 

 @ -# -
#

# 
!   

 




 #  '$ 
 #     ! ' ' ; #  A 
 )

  '!   ; !  B ''#  # 
  !  #!   #

! '!   ##  '$# ; !  ; 
 #   
  

  $ " 

' ! ' 
 
 !  A 
  
 )'
 ' ' 

'$# ) $	'  
 

  !   
 '!  





C#	9.  	 	
 
     
   

    !   "
 #

$ 
 	C! 
"	

*
'$#  !  !  !  #	
 ;  @   A 
 @ 

'	'
 	# 
#$#  '

 ; 
 
 @; #!  )'
 '$#	   ! '  A 
  )

   '$##  
 ##<   ,!  ; ! 	; ! < 

  @

-# -
#  
'!   ) 	# ;   
 &'!     
 

 
 ; !  
$ #   ) $  ; ! < 

  # !  ' D

; 
 
 !  ' $  
'$#  
 ! 

##	;  #; ! 
 /' 
 !     # C

3 C6 ; @  ) #  ;  #   +:   ! ! # $##


   
 
 #  '$   !   )  ; ! 


 (

• E   

• E    '$#


• E  ##)


• E  !   )  ) 

• $ ; 

 ) #   '#

 '   . 
  
# /# #  '  ; !  	

# #'# $#  
 ''		

   $/& . 
  
# /' '!  ; !   
 
 ) 


;   	  #  
 


  '  " ##	
 
 '$#

'$ 
# ! @ 
 #$#  $ $   ; ! < 

 !  '

 ; 
 
 !  #  ' ##   
'$#

 +&' . 
  
# '
 ##)
 ; !  ; 
 #

 3)6) $F'  
 ) #  ' ; # #


' !  # #!  
    )
 !  !  
 !    


$ # '$#  
 

  '

   + +'0  . 
  
# ' 
 

  '  ! 


 ! )# ) $  
; 	
  
 ' 
 

 ' # !  


#  G!   ;   $ ; ); !  $  ; 
  	

; !     
)  # # 
 # 
  
 '$

/1 && $ . !  
 $	
  
#  ; !  

 
  $ #  
 ) '$#
  $#  
 

 ' 
 	


 
#  
  #$#  $# $ 

  ) '$#


'$# 
  
  ' ! '  !  ) '$# '!   $ 


! 
   ## ') 

B  ! ! # 
 ! < G!  
 

 '  		#

'' 

  #  )  ; $	
  '$ 
# 


#  G 

 '    
  
 '! ' 
 ' 3


	 
#  
 #$# #< #  45   ) 6 " 
 ##
' # $  ###  
 	
 
#  ##  
  3	


     
 '$F
   !   
 ! )# $F6

##	
 !  A 
 
  #    
 ! @ 


 '$ #  '
 

  ' ! G  ) '$#  
 ' 


 ## '!   '$# 
 ! # '$## #  # # $ 
 

 
# ! @  
 
    G!     
 ' 
 

 ' ,
! 	


 
#  
  ##' $ G!    ! '#  )

'$# 
    ! '#  
'!   '$#  G!   '  
 



' 
 $ #$# 
#   ' # ' ! 
  ' 
 ) '$#D

# 
     ; 
 
 ! ! !  ## 
 "--$ 9 
 

 
# 
 '$    ; !  
$   ) '$#  '!   '$#	#


  
  
#   ### ) '$#  ! '#  '!  

'$#	
  ##' G! 

B   #  
 @  !  # $
 ! 
! 
 # 

'$ #  
   
A !  # $
 	' 
 $
 #

!  	#  ##  '  
 #

 	 
   


-# -
#  '' 
 '$  
 !   ; '  
 


'!   '$#3!  '' '$#6  ; 
  ' 

 ' 

 

G 
 #  '!   '$#  #  
 #	!  ; ! 	)

   '!  	# ) '$# 
#    '!   '$#	; 
 ; !  
$ 



  
  )  
'!   '$#
 ;  B
 
 !  # 

'$#  # '!   '$#	;   
   $ ; !  
 '   )

 '$# 
'!   '$##  ; G# ) '$#   ; 
 

 '

 '!   '$#


@  
 ''  ! !   
 - - # #  (-/

 # 7/	8!  # 8! 	9	# - - !  "


$  G	' #  
   !   
)*:)+0



	

8 9

= -# - - # #$

-# -
#  ,#

-# -
# ,# ! 


 =!  $ EB	 :



B
	& 


2
From: Karina Mayner [mailto:karinamayner@gmail.com] 

Sent: Friday, September 04, 2015 11:27 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Recently, I became aware of a proposed rule that would undermine my ability to plan for my 

retirement in ways I believe best for me, and I want to share my concerns with you.

My understanding is that the Department of Labor’s (DOL’s) proposed retirement rule would 

limit my ability to trade listed options in my IRA. It’s a limitation that, to me, makes no sense.

I have traded options in my IRA, just as I have in non-retirement brokerage accounts, and I had 

to qualify for this privilege. Education and support from my brokerage firm are available to me 

24-7 to answer questions or validate ideas. I can join online communities, take courses, watch 

instructional videos, test strategies, or speak to a representative any time I want.

This proposed rule would change all of that by making my brokerage firm a fiduciary for my 

IRA – responsible for looking out for my best interests – if it provides any research, tools or 

education that the rule views as “advice.” My account in its current state would likely be 

considered an “advised IRA,” and as I understand the rule, options trading would be prohibited 

in it.

Sincerely,

Karina Mayner, CPA, CGMA
<PAGE>   1

                        [LETTERHEAD OF FAHN KANNE & CO.]

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
              ---------------------------------------------------

As independent certified public accountants of Ampal Industries (Israel) Ltd.,
we hereby consent to the incorporation of our report included in FORM 10-K, into
the Company's previously filed Registration Statement File No. 33-51023 and No.
55137.

                                                    /s/ Fahn, Kanne & Co.

                                                      Fahn, Kanne & Co.
                                             Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)

Tel-Aviv, Israel
March 25, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000731625
<NAME> HOSPITAL STAFFING SERVICES, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                       1,697,804
<SECURITIES>                                    11,620
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,502,112
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,164,379
<PP&E>                                         986,592
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,370,821
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,367,460
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,350
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,068,742
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,370,821
<SALES>                                     56,185,723
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            56,185,723
<CGS>                                       33,625,607
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               33,625,607
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            21,112,689
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (245,319)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,202,108
<INCOME-TAX>                                   700,570
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,447,427
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,902,678
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32
        

</TABLE>