alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/21/15 

Received: July 13, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jyj-ns45

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2200

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Ed Stanley

Address: 

5000 S. Western Street #8883

Amarillo, TX, 79114-8883

Email: edstxama@suddenlink.net

General Comment

In America, we have freedom to choose our own retirement funds and sources of future income. 

Please allow it to remain so, that we can always call America, the Land of the Free and the Home 

of the Brave. Our founding fathers believed this and fought other tyrants who wanted to force 

issue on them to their detriment. Should we not do the same?
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 404 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 148
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 404

                          [Report No. 107-427]

      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2002

 Mr. Diaz-Balart, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

    Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on the legislative 
day of Thursday, May 2, 2002, for the Speaker to entertain a motion 
that the House suspend the rules relating to the resolution (H. Res. 
392) expressing solidarity with Israel in its fight against terrorism. 
If the Speaker entertains such motion, debate under clause 1(c) of rule 
XV shall be extended to one hour.

                                                 House Calendar No. 148

107th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 404

                          [Report No. 107-427]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 1, 2002

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
#### Christiana Fitzsimmons, Respondent, v. The City of Rome, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Follett, J.
Exhibit 23




               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We  hereby  consent  to the incorporation  by  reference  in  the
Registration Statements of Alpharma Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form
S-8  (File No. 33-60495) and Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-57501,  333-
70229, 333-86037 and 333-86153) of our report dated February  23,
2000,relating to the financial statements, which appears in  this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.






PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Florham Park, New Jersey
March 29, 2000
-----Original Message----- 

From: Kelley Nielsen [mailto:shegeek@comcast.net] 

Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 4:47 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 

Dear U.S. Dept. of Labor et al, 

I am against any government takeover or management of retirement 

accounts, such as 401(k) accounts, belonging to U.S. citizens. 

This would be in direct violation of the rights of citizens to manage 

their money as they see fit. There is no need for a takeover, since 

Americans have been managing these accounts on their own with no 

problems. The more the government is involved in the banking system, 

the more problems it creates. 

Sincerely, 

Kelley Nielsen 

2600 Senter Rd spc 45 

San Jose Ca 95111
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 230

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Article I, section

10 of the United States Constitution should not be used to renew

the interstate economic protectionism of our Nation’s early history.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 2, 2001

Mr. SESSIONS (for himself, Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. SHADEGG, Mr.

KOLBE, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. TANCREDO, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr.

NUSSLE, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. HYDE, Mr. JOHNSON of Illinois, Mrs.

BIGGERT, Mr. HOSTETTLER, Mr. GUTKNECHT, Mr. THUNE, Mr. PAUL,

Mr. BONILLA, Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin, Mr. STUMP, Mr. RADANOVICH,

Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. OTTER, Mr. WELLER, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. BOEHNER,

Mr. PETRI, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin, Mr. KENNEDY of Minnesota, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. ISSA, Mr. LATHAM, Mr.

LEACH, Mr. GANSKE, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. CRANE, Mr. SKEEN, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. DOOLEY of California, Mr. RUSH, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois,

Mr. COSTELLO, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Mr. STUPAK, Mr. OBERSTAR,

Mr. SABO, Mr. TRAFICANT, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. BARRETT of Wisconsin,

Mr. KIND, Mr. OBEY, Mr. KLECZKA, and Mr. PHELPS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

Article I, section 10 of the United States Constitution

should not be used to renew the interstate economic

protectionism of our Nation’s early history.

Whereas in consenting to the Northeast Interstate Dairy

Compact in 1997, Congress undermined the fundamental
2

•HRES 230 IH

Constitutional principle of one nationwide market free

from interstate barriers;

Whereas recent use of Article I, section 10 of the United

States Constitution with regard to national dairy policy

has renewed the interstate economic protectionism of our

Nation’s early history;

Whereas fashioning a national dairy policy supporting United

States dairy producers without promoting interstate regionalism is in the National interest;

Whereas the Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact has cost

consumers in New England more than $140,000,000 in

higher milk prices, harming those who can least afford it;

Whereas if compacts were to be expanded to the mid-Atlantic,

South, intermountain and Pacific Northwest regions, consumers would pay more than $2,000,000,000 in higher

milk prices;

Whereas according to a 1999 University of Missouri study,

dairy producers outside of existing and proposed compact

regions stand to lose between 16 and 21 cents per hundredweight of milk;

Whereas the Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact promotes

the overproduction of Class I milk; and

Whereas the Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact is the only

congressionally authorized interstate compact providing

economic protectionism: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Northeast Interstate Dairy Com2 pact should be allowed to expire under its own terms on

3 September 30, 2001.

Æ
Docket: HHS-OS-2010-0015 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Comment On: HHS-OS-2010-0015-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: HHS-OS-2010-0015-0005 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

General Comment 

Fixed cost sharing in relation to deductible - Consider guidance regarding a deductible 

reimbursement program (or health reimbursement arrangement) whereas the deductible is 

increased, which may result in the plan ceasing to be a grandfathered plan, however the employer 

reimburses the employee for a portion of the deductible whereas the actual deductible applicable 

to the employee would not result in the plan ceasing to be a grandfathered plan. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: August 12, 2010 

Received: June 24, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: July 23, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b094cc 

Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/ContentViewer?objectId=0900006480b09... 8/12/2010
#### Henry A. Smith, *Appellant, v. Zoe*A. M. Fournel, Respondent.—

Order affirmed, without costs.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMaintenance = reuse-oriented software developmentMaintenance is viewed as a reuse process. In this context, a set of models that can be used to support the maintenance process is discussed. A high level reuse framework is presented that characterizes the object of reuse, the process for adapting that object for its target application, and the reused object within its target application. Based upon this framework, a qualitative comparison is offered of the three maintenance process models with regard to their strengths and weaknesses and the circumstances in which they are appropriate. To provide a more systematic, quantitative approach for evaluating the appropriateness of the particular maintenance model, a measurement scheme is provided, based upon the reuse framework, in the form of an organized set of questions that need to be answered. To support the reuse perspective, a set of reuse enablers are discussed.Document ID19900012215Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsBasili, Victor R.*(Maryland Univ. College Park, MD, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1989Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberUMIACS-TR-89-48CS-TR-2244NAS 1.26:186455NASA-CR-186455Meeting InformationMeeting: Conference on Software MaintenanceLocation: Phoenix, AZCountry: United StatesStart Date: October 1, 1988Accession Number90N21531Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NSG-5123CONTRACT_GRANT: N00014-87-K-0307Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900012215.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 531 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 531

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to permit Members to 
  characterize action in the Senate in the same manner that they may 
                   characterize action in the House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 2002

  Mr. Rohrabacher (for himself and Mr. Frank) submitted the following 
        resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to permit Members to 
  characterize action in the Senate in the same manner that they may 
                   characterize action in the House.

    Resolved, That paragraph (b) of clause 1 of rule XVII of the Rules 
of the House of Representatives is amended to read as follows:
    ``(b) Remarks in debate, including references to the Senate or its 
Members, shall be confined to the question under debate, avoiding 
personality.''.
                                 <all>
```
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

9 March 2004

In Case C-314/03: Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Failure to transpose Directive 2000/52/EC - Transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings)

(2004/C 94/18)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-314/03: Commission of the European Communities (Agent: G. Rozet), with an address for service in Luxembourg, against Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Agent: S. Schreiner): Application for a declaration that, by failing to adopt and, in any event, by failing to communicate to the Commission the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2000/52/EC of 26 July 2000 amending Directive 80/723/EEC on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings (OJ 2000 L 193, p. 75), the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive, the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of: C. Gulmann, President of the Chamber, S. von Bahr (Rapporteur) and R. Silva de Lapuerta, Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 9 March 2004, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 213 of 6.09.2003.

----
0

50

100150200250300350400450

Apr‐11 Jul‐11 Oct‐11 Jan‐12 Apr‐12 Jul‐12 Oct‐12 Jan‐13 Apr‐13 

Monthly Sales Volume (thousands of gallons)

Flex Fuel Sales

Direct Supply from an Illinois Dry Grind Corn Bio‐refiner
~~~otics 

Lith1um lon 

Polymer Battery 

P!"O'VIde s•n•udoo 

..-mwt--entNblttllry 

powerpsbelow 

l pl"ldlfinld ll""'l 

motorsM~dPf<ll:lellenu• 

propertyb»!»nc.o 

paw., down tN UAV 

Thetel....-.wymodiJI<Istr.nsmn:91SMHz jUSA] « 

433MHl j£1.H'QP1) 

Camera ASir..ITIGirrer• SuCI"I ISihl 

Gol'rouodellforo.:s.ew>d"o 

tbn.lshl•ss c...,b•l 

Gimbal 

ThtGPS i ndCon-piSS ire hoo.:sad 

b"tlmlllywtuchmuMth:!ottt>e 

doi"ICOOruiiiiTOW~stfac po!I"IMC 

tod"lenos•oltho! UAV 

Nllmrr;n"by 

Jethro Hazelhurst 

· - Motorl 

• Motor2 

- Motor 3 

• ~~87654 \ 

" - .... ) c' .. - ... ' 

Servo Connections Poxh•·NI:hulb• d<uppoYitlr $o.:pplvprO'O'Id.-d 

by e8E Con~rdthe4on1£SC 

Note 

TrM~sl ttsPW socn•ls 

th:!o oxhtwlUni"IQ( 

reldonto PPM$1CN'IS 

purch•s.e • PPM .-.c......-

whod1o ""tpuU I PPM 

••crllbv c:til\llt 

Transmitter 

ThetnorsmottertSif1epn<Ttlry nkbet-A-.entl>e 

oper-JtorlnC~• UA~Ittypoclllytrlf1srr tslt 2 4GH: 

Atrar.smltter.,.,·!th8ori"T.QI"I ch•nn•lsusui'I'.>Oint 

to ~ltllopemor tous.emostoft~ef\lltures 

onpiXhiWkll'dcorrtrdiCiftlll 

Tsfromtt>et~nsrrtttertl~Q'Mf1c 

tt>eopeno:« ow ltttncycortrol~r 

"""'.v
Exhibit
      32.1





STATEMENT
      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of China International
      Tourism Holdings Ltd. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2007,
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Lei, Ming,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:




*
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




*
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








CHINA
                INTERNATIONAL
                TOURISM HOLDINGS LTD.
              (Registrant)Date: April
                14, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Lei,
                MingLei,
                Ming
              Chief
                Executive Officer








This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
| Official Journalof the European Union | ISSN 1725-2423C 140A**Volume 47****20 May 2004**  |
|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
| English edition |                                                                         | Information and Notices                                                               |  |  |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|
|                 |
| Notice No       | Contents                                                                | Page                                                                                  |  |
|                 |                                                                         | I *Information*

. . . . . .

II *Preparatory Acts*

. . . . . .

III *Notices*    |  |
|                 |                                                                         | **European Parliament**                                                               |
|                 | Notice to readers                                                       | 1                                                                                     |
| 2004/C 140 A/01 | Guide for candidates in procedures organised by the European Parliament | 3                                                                                     |
| 2004/C 140 A/02 | Notice to candidates with electronic access to this text                | 13                                                                                    |
| 2004/C 140 A/03 | Recruitment notice PE/89/S for university graduates                     | 14                                                                                    |

**EN**
----

----

I Communications

Commission

----

Taux de change de l'euro (1)

31 mai 2004

(2004/C 145/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: taux de change de référence publié par la Banque centrale européenne.

----

----

Notification préalable d'une opération de concentration

(Affaire no COMP/M.3090 — VOLKSWAGEN/Offset/Crescent/Lease Plan/JV)

(2004/C 145/02)

(Texte présentant de l'intérêt pour l'EEE)

----

(1)JO L 24 du 29.1.2004, p.1.

----
From: Brian Schreiner [mailto:brians@scminvest.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 2:40 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: 2010 investment advice proposed rule

What investment theories are generally accepted, and what investment practices are

consistent or inconsistent with such theories?

There are two primary theories: active and passive.  Within active, there are many sub‐theories.  

There are hundreds if not thousands of investment practices consistent with these theories.  

Professional money managers should be allowed to implement whatever theories they wish and

plan sponsors, participants and the plans' advisors must be allowed to choose from a variety of

actively and passively managed solutions.  Their should be little or no restriction on which

vehicles the plan sponsor, participant and advisor choose.  Because markets are constantly

chaning, the freedom to choose from the widest variey of funds is of critical importantce to the

investor.  

Should the regulation specify such theories and require their application?

No.   

Should the model specify a minimum number of years in performance data used in the

models?

No.

Is a fund's past performance relative to the average for its asset class an appropriate criterion?

No.

Under what, if any, conditions would it be consistent with generally accepted investment

theories and with consideration of fees to recommend a fund with superior past performance

over an alternative fund in the same asset class with average performance but lower fees?

In my professional experience, funds with superior past performance tend to outperform funds

with average performance.  Granted, this is not always true, but it does tend to hold true.

In my view, the DOL is overly concerned about fees.  In fact, the nation seems to be overly

concerned with fees.  In the end, what matters is the dollar value in the investor's account.  Fees

are only one factor.  There are many other (more important) factors, such as performance and

drawdown (losses along the way).  For example, an investor might be willing to pay a higher fee

for a lower performing fund, if he can sleep better at night!  In this senario, he is paying for risk

management, not performance.  This is just one of many nuianced issues when it comes to

investing.  Generally speaking, I think the government should stay away from these nuianced

questions.
Should the regulation specify such conditions?

No.

On what, if any, bases can a fund's superior past performance be demonstrated to derive not

from chance but from factors that are likely to persist and continue to affect performance in

the future?

There ARE successful active money mangers.  We are one of them!  

Thank you,

Brian

‐‐‐ 

Brian A. Schreiner 

Schreiner Capital Management, Inc. 

www.scminvest.com

800-351-0268 ext.109 

610-524-7310 local 

610-524-4050 fax
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

I, Stephen A. Gorgol, ChiefFinancial Officer of Vista Medical Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), dohereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(a)           the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofthe Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(b)           the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  May 14, 2003

 
| /s/  STEPHEN A. GORGOL |   |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|                        |   |   |   |   |
| Stephen A.  Gorgol          |   |   |   |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer    |   |   |   |   |

 

----