alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 608 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 240
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 608

                          [Report No. 107-783]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 13, 2002

     Mr. Goss, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of Thursday, November 14, 
2002, providing for consideration or disposition of a conference report 
to accompany the bill (H.R. 4628) to authorize appropriations for 
fiscal year 2003 for intelligence and intelligence-related activities 
of the United States Government, the Community Management Account, and 
the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System, and 
for other purposes.

                                                 House Calendar No. 240

107th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 608

                          [Report No. 107-783]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 13, 2002

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
#### Attorney General v. Continental Life Insurance Company.

Order affirmed, without costs. Opinion by Davis, P. J.
Page | of 1

REC I4¥ bE 1-04
Free 5 010

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS

BRANCH As of: February 05, 2010
Received: February 02, 2010

Status: Posted
PUBLIC SUBMISSION [restea: reoruary 95, 2010
Comments Due: May 03, 2010)
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0006
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants & Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Comment On: IRS-2010-0006-0001
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Document: IRS-2010-0006-0014
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-02028

Submitter Information

Name: Thomas Genovese
Address:

Aurora, IL,
Email: tom.geno@gmail.com

General Comment

This ERISA rule change appears to be a government money-grab. In my opinion it will lock
seniors into potentially poorly performing investments. This smacks of a similar situation that
took place in Argentina that wiped out the retirement savings of citizens.

If I want government bonds, I can buy them through my self-managed 401K or IRA. If I want a

so-called guaranteed lifetime income, I can buy an annuity. I do not need, nor do I want
government help in this regard.

https://fdms.erulemaking .net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 2/5/2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
 THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF HOSPITAL STAFFING  SERVICES,  INC. FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED  NOVEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENT.      
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                            145,247
<SECURITIES>                                       12,145
<RECEIVABLES>                                  10,181,373
<ALLOWANCES>                                      559,251
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               23,238,535
<PP&E>                                          2,424,780
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,545,045
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 26,411,427
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          14,417,664
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                            6,360
<OTHER-SE>                                     11,321,795
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   26,411,427
<SALES>                                        62,234,015
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               62,234,015
<CGS>                                          38,045,513
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  38,045,513
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  248,422
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                554,362
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   481,563
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (2,705)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               484,268
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (254,955)
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      229,313
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
        

</TABLE>
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.9 MB)
 
 fort belvoir Dunford CJCS
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
PEEMEU AO

LEGAL ?.
PUBLICATC

Page 1 of 1

AUG 2 7 2010

As of: August 26, 2010

PUBLIC Status Posted

Posted: August 26, 2010

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0479
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Henry Neff
Address:
111 Lake Davidson Lane
Helena, AL, 35080
Email: henry@henryneff.com
Phone: 205-410-9828

General Comment

See attached file(s)

Attachments

IRS-2010-0010-0479.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call-...

8/26/2010


August 10, 2010

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to
Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As aconsumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

Henry Neff
#### JOSEPH PARETTI, AN INFANT, ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. FRANK M. MITCHELL, RECEIVER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Submitted October 28, 1932

Decided June 29, 1933.

Before Justices Bodine and Donges.

*564Fox the appellants, Autenrieth, *Gannon & Wortendyhe.*

For the respondent, *Ziegener & Brenner.*

Per Curiam:

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Hudson County Court of Common Pleas, entered upon the verdict of a jury in favor of the infant plaintiff against the defendants after a trial before Judge O’Regan.

The only grounds of appeal are to the effect that it was error to refuse to nonsuit or direct a verdict for defendants. The motions were upon the grounds that there was no proof of defendants’ negligence and that the infant plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence.

The facts are that Joseph Paretti, eleven years of age, was coasting on January 26th, 1929, on Seeaucus road, in Jersey City, near a point where that road intersects Tonnele avenue. He was going westerly. An automobile owned by the defendant F. M. Mitchell Motor Company, for which appears a receiver, and driven by the defendant Murt McConville, was proceeding northerly on Tonnele avenue. At the intersection the infant plaintiff was struck by the car and injured.

There was testimony that the defendants’ car was being driven thirty-five miles an hour; that the road was icy; that the car was not under such control that it could be quickly stopped in view of driving conditions. The driver had a view of Seeaucus road and could have observed the boy coming, if he had looked. There was ample evidence of the negligent driving of defendants’ car to take the case to the jury on that question.

The boy was lying on his stomach on the sled. He testified that he had a clear view of Tonnele avenue in the direction from which the car was coming. He said he looked for vehicles on that street and saw none; and that he could stop if any vehicles were on Tonnele avenue. The first thing he knew about a ear was when he was underneath it.

Another boy, Frank Miller, was on his sled about twenty-five feet in the rear of Joseph Paretti. He was sitting up *565He said the defendants’ car was four hundred feet from Secaucus road when the plaintiff was fifty feet from Tonnele avenue. He saw defendant’s car and steered his sled into a large stone in order to stop before reaching the intersection.

We think the state of the proofs presented questions of fact as to the negligence of the defendant and as to the contributory negligence of the plaintiff. *Mellen*v. *Public Service Interstate Transportation Co.,*110 *N. J. L.*557; 166 *Atl. Rep.*216.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
243

- A Burgess Road

, Greensboro NC 27409 Office (336) 665

- 7149 www.skylease cargo

. c o m 10 February 2015

VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION

U. S. Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington , DC 20591

Re: Request for Extension of Exemption 10231A, Docket FAA

- 2006

- 26080

Ladies and Gen tlemen:

In accordance with §11.61 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), Sky Lease I , Inc.

, d

. b

. a

. Trade Winds Airlines, d

. b

. a

. Trade W inds, petitions the Administrator for an extension of Exemption 10231A, Docket FAA

- 2006

- 26080. The exemption provides relief from §121.434(c)(1)(ii) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allowin g Sky Lease I to substitute a qualified and authorized check airman for an FAA Inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in command (PIC) who is completing initial or upgrade training as specified in §121.434 during at least one flight leg that includes a t akeoff and landing.

Granting of this extension continues to be in the public interest and would continue to allow the FAA to focus its inspection force on higher priority safety issues. It would also continue to provide for a higher level of PIC candidat e scrutiny by using Sky Lease I check airman who are more familiar with company operating policies and procedures.

Granting of this extension would continue to have no significant impact upon safety. The authorized check airman are highly trained, experi enced, and qualified in the specific aircraft
type s . Sky Lease I check airman are only used to satisfy the requirements of §121.434(c)(1)(ii) when a qualified FAA Inspector is not available.

Sky Lease I is aware that the FAA has granted extensions to othe r air carriers for similar relief sought by this request. Therefore, since granting this extension is not precedent setting, Sky Lease I requests that publication of this petition in the Federal Register be waived in accordance with Section 11.87(b).U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket FAA

- 2006

- 26080 10 February 2015 Page Two

SUMMARY

Sky Lease I , Inc. Petition for Extension of Exemption 10231A

Sky Lease I , Inc. petitions the Administrator for an extension of Exemption 10231A, Docket FAA

2006

- 26080. T he exemption provides relief from §121.434(c)(1)(ii) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allowing Sky Lease I to substitute a qualified and authorized check airman for an FAA Inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in command (PIC) who is completing initial or upgrade training as specified in §121.434 during at least one flight leg that includes a takeoff and landing.

Should you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at 336

- 668

- 7505

.

Sincerely,

Herman F. Gillis, III Director of Operations hgillis@skylease.aero

cc: C. Barco

– VP Operations & Maintenance
R. Lohlein

– Chief Pilot
Bob Nance

– Director of Maintenance
Michael Steinke

– Director of Quality A. Duffy

– Director of Safety K. Humphries

– FAA POI EA 039
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         138,711
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  207,335
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               532,313
<PP&E>                                         169,380
<DEPRECIATION>                                 111,068
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 733,543
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          144,969
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       871,286
<OTHER-SE>                                   (340,353)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   733,543
<SALES>                                      1,505,952
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,505,981
<CGS>                                          817,434
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,399,565
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,740
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 96,676
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,876
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             68,800
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    68,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 25, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 25, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20I0113. FEDERATED SERVICE INSURANCE COMPANY v. GLORIA JEAN PRICE et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 16CV65969
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,503                   3,503
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  107,898                 107,898
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,100)                 (5,100)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               117,276                 117,276
<PP&E>                                          96,730                  96,730
<DEPRECIATION>                                (23,013)                (23,013)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 283,804                 283,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         (60,944)                (60,944)
<BONDS>                                      (115,707)               (115,707)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         (119)                   (119)
<OTHER-SE>                                   (106,603)               (106,603)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 (106,722)               (106,722)
<SALES>                                      (197,904)                (99,860)
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             (197,904)                (99,860)
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  203,464                 109,011
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,408                   2,910
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,968                  12,061
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,007)                 (4,488)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,961                   7,573
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,961                   7,573
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .58                     .64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .58                     .64



</TABLE>