alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 826.31 Filing and service of documents and general procedures.

The rules contained in 49 CFR part 821 apply to proceedings under the Act, unless they are superseded by or are inconsistent with a provision of this part.

[59 FR 30532, June 14, 1994]
Exhibit 99.1





                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
South Jersey Gas Company (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Charles Biscieglia, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





/s/ Charles Biscieglia
-----------------------------------------------------
Name:  Charles Biscieglia
Title: Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2003
#### The State v. Connelly, *Plaintiff in Error.*

On the authority of *The State v. Fancher,*71 Mo. 460, section 1561, Revised Statutes 1879, is held constitutional, and an indictment founded on it sufficient.

*Error to Moberly Court of Common Pleas.*— Hon. G. H. Burckhartt, Judge.

Affirmed.

*W. T. McCanne*for plaintiff in error.

*D. II. McIntyre,*Attorney General, for the State.

Sherwood, C. J.

The indictment in this case is bottomed on section 1561, Revised Statutes 1879. The only points are its legal sufficiency to sustain a conviction, and the constitutionality of the statute cited. These were quite recently considered by this court in the ease of *State v. Fancher,*71 Mo. 460. Therefore, judgment affirmed.

All concur.
Notice of Public Listening Sessions 

Tommy P. Beaudreau, Acting Assistant Secretary, Land and Minerals Management, 

U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI), with the Bureau of Safety & Environmental 

Enforcement (BSEE) and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), will hold 

three Listening Sessions June 6 and June 7 with an eye toward improving rules for oil 

and gas exploration, development and production in the Alaskan Outer Continental 

Shelf (OCS). 

The Department of the Interior is in the process of developing specific standards to 

ensure that oil and gas operations on the Alaskan OCS are conducted safely and 

responsibly. At the outset of this rulemaking process, DOI is engaging interested parties 

and stakeholders in Alaska to discuss the scope and objectives of this effort. BSEE and 

BOEM are working jointly on this rulemaking.

Public participation is invited to the Listening Sessions on June 6 and June 7 at either of 

the locations. 

Listening Sessions Schedule: 

June 6 / Thursday Anchorage (Loussac Library Complex – Assembly Chambers) 

11am-2pm 

June 7 / Friday Barrow (City Assembly Chambers) 

12Noon-2pm and 5pm-7:30pm 

If you are unable to attend the Listening Sessions in person, DOI is accepting and 

considering written public comments electronically. For consideration they must be 

submitted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal (http://www.regulations.gov, 

docket number BOEM-2013-0035 (available beginning Thursday, June 6, 2013). 

The deadline to receive comments is Friday, June 21, 2013 (12:00 midnight, EST / 

8:00pm, ADT). Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other 

personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your 

entire comment, including your personal identifying information, may be made 

publicly available at any time. While you may ask DOI (prominently at the beginning of 

your submission) to withhold your personal identifying information from public view, 

DOI cannot guarantee that it will be able to do so. DOI will not consider anonymous 

comments.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Periodic Report by the Chief Executive Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**


**As
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002**





Pursuant
      to, and for purposes only of, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned hereby certifies
      that (i) the Quarterly Report of Shore Bancshares, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
      quarter ended June 30, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of Shore Bancshares, Inc.





Date:
                August 8, 2008
            /s/
                W. Moorhead VermilyeW.
                Moorhead VermilyePresident/Chief
                Executive Officer
# Defeat ISIS Mission in Iraq and Syria for January through March 2024   

/ Published April 5, 2024

April 5, 2024Release Number 20240405 - 01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla. –**United States Central Command, along with our Defeat ISIS partners, Iraqi Security Forces and the Syrian Democratic Forces, conducted 94 Defeat ISIS Missions resulting in 18 ISIS operatives killed and 63 detained from January through March. In Iraq, 66 partnered operations resulted in 11 ISIS operatives killed and 36 ISIS operatives detained. In Syria, 28 partnered operations resulted in 7 ISIS operatives killed and 27 ISIS operatives detained.

The continued pursuit of the approximately 2,500 ISIS fighters at large across Iraq and Syria is a critical component to the enduring defeat of ISIS.  Equally vital are the ongoing international efforts to repatriate more than 9,000 ISIS detainees in detention facilities in Syria, and the repatriation, rehabilitation, and reintegration of more than 45,000 individuals and families from the Al Hol and Al Roj camps. CENTCOM supports United States efforts to maintain sustained pressure to address the persistent ISIS threat.  

“We are committed to the enduring defeat of ISIS because of the threat they pose both regionally and globally. We continue to focus our efforts on specifically targeting those members of ISIS who are seeking to conduct external operations outside of Iraq and Syria and those ISIS members attempting to break out ISIS members in detention in an attempt to reconstitute their forces,” said Gen. Michael Erik Kurilla, commander of U.S. Central Command. “Defeating this threat requires continued pressure from our partners and the Coalition.”
# 380th ESFS brings proficiency firing to the AOR

/ Published Oct. 10, 2019
AL DHAFRA AIR BASE, United Arab Emirates, 
The 380th Expeditionary Security Forces Squadron has worked diligently this year to bolster their training program and bring increased lethality to Al Dhafra Air Base. 

After months of relationship building, planning and paperwork, the 380th ESFS conducted the first proficiency firing course in the U.S. Air Forces Central Command area of responsibility on an Emirati firing range.

“Regardless whether we’re in the AOR or at home station, opportunities to apply our skills in order to remain proficient in our core tasks must be seized,” said Maj. Kevin Collett, 380th ESFS commander.

Proficiency firing courses are designed to prepare Airmen for stressful situations that may occur during live fire situations. Airmen are divided up into fire teams and must engage a target while communicating with their team to move among various barriers.

“The purpose is to increase proficiency of small unit tactics with specific regard to movement and communication, as well as immediate action drills,” said Collett.

On average a security forces Airmen may fire their weapon on a range four to five times a year. However, that is not always an option in a deployed location according to Staff Sgt. Adam Triplett, 380th ESFS training noncommissioned officer. Implementing this training ensures Defenders maintain readiness and lethality, even when deployed. 

With any new program or training, there are always challenges, but the successful initial courses serve as a stepping-stone to future opportunities. 

“Without question, there is more work to be done. Climate, resources, and manpower availability all serve as challenges to full implementation,” said Collett. “However, so many of the ‘big rocks,’ such as range availability, access to simunitions, and host nation approval by the Emiratis create a sense of excitement about where we can go from here.”

The training is set to continue though oncoming rotations to ADAB and will continue to progress. 

“Eventually we would like to move from sim rounds to live rounds,” said Tripplett. “If we can come out here and actually use live rounds, they get the full fog of war type of training with the sound, the live rounds, the feeling of actually shooting and engaging targets.”

Live rounds are not something in the immediate future for this particular training. However, the Airmen do utilize live-firing for zeroing their M4 carbine rifles according to Collett. 

“The course is a first in the AOR, and a strong nod to the initiatives started over the past year as part of the CSAF’s ‘Year of the Defender’ under the line of effort to increase lethality,” said Collett.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ZACHARY JOHNSTON,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00014-CR

Appeal from

168th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20170D03893)

O R D E R

The record before us does not contain the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right 

of appeal. TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The trial court is ordered to prepare and file with the trial 

court clerk within thirty days from the date of this order a certification of the defendant’s right of 

appeal as required by TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2) and 25.2(d). The trial court clerk shall prepare a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing the certification and file it with this Court no later than 

March 14, 2020.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 29

th day of January, 2020.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
SECOND AMENDMENT TO RAW MATERIAL SUPPLY CONTRACT



 




Exhibit 10.26


SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT RS-486/82




	 	 	 
	 

	 	AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR THE
 SALE
AND PURCHASE OF ETHENE AND/OR 
PROPENE BY
AND BETWEEN COPESUL – 
COMPANHIA
PETROQUÍMICA DO SUL
 AND POLIOLEFINAS S/A







COPESUL
– COMPANHIA PETROQUÍMICA DO SUL, a joint stock company headquartered at
BR-386 Rodovia Tabaí/Canoas Km. 419 Pólo Petroquímico Lote 23 Triunfo/RS,
enrolled in the Ministry of Finance National Roll of Corporate Taxpayers under
# 88.948.492/0001-92, herein represented by its President Director Adolpho
Shuler Netto and Superintendent Director Ruy Lerner, hereinafter referred to as
COPESUL; and



POLIOLEFINAS S/A, headquartered in the City of São Paulo, State of São Paulo,
enrolled in the Ministry of Finance National Roll of Corporate Taxpayers under
# 62.336.946/0001-80, herein represented by its President Director José Adolpho
Lisboa de Souza, hereinafter referred to as BUYER,



DO HEREBY decide to execute this Amendment to the Agreement for the Sale and
Purchase of Raw Material dated December 8th, 1982, aiming at amending the
maximum and minimum quantities of raw material supply.



CLAUSE ONE – PURPOSE





		
	1.1 -  	This Amendment aims at amending the Agreement RS-486/82 as to the
yearly maximum limits of ETHENE that COPESUL undertakes to supply to BUYER
as well as the yearly minimum limits that COPESUL and BUYER undertake to
supply and purchase, respectively.





CLAUSE TWO – QUANTITIES TO BE SUPPLIED (EXHIBIT A)





		
	2.1 -  	The agreed supplies of ETHENE as defined by the limits established in
EXHIBIT A attached to the Agreement RS-486/82 are hereby amended as
follows:





Maximum outflow per hour = 22 tons.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Yearly Minimum	 	Yearly Maximum	 	Monthly Minimum	 	Monthly Maximum
	Consumption
	 	Consumption
	 	Consumption
	 	Consumption

	98,800 tons
	 	164,800 tons	 	7,800 tons	 	14,750 tons







CLAUSE THREE – MISCELLANEOUS





		
	3.1 -  	Any and all clauses and conditions of the Agreement herein amended not
expressly rectified hereunder shall remain in full force and effect.





 









 








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties cause this document to be duly signed in three
(03) copies with two (02) pages each, of identical form and substance, in the
presence of the undersigned witnesses.



Triunfo, December 8th, 1986.




	 	 	 
	[signature]

	 	[signature]
	


	 	

	JOSÉ ADOLPHO LISBOA DE SOUZA

	 	ADOLPHO SHULER NETTO
	 
	 	 
	

	 	[signature]
	

	 	

	

	 	RUY LERNER
	 
	 	 
	[signature]
	 	 
	

	 	 
	(illegible)
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	[signature]
	 	 
	

	 	 
	(illegible)
----------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------

""'1(\ Page 1 of 1 AUG 2 6 LVoJ 

NG DIVISION 

l.EGAL PROCEiS:CEGULAilONS 

PUBLICAn<rRANCH 

As of: August 26, 2010 

Received: August 10, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 26, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2d323 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0446 


Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 


Submitter Information 

General Comment 

See attached file(s) 

Attachments 

IRS-2010-0010-0446.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

https;llfdms.erulemaking. netlfdms-web-agency IcomponentisubmitterlnfoCoverPage ?Call =... 8/26/2010 
Office ofConsumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care AI:;t 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-2010­

0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part ofthe new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PP ACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of th;:se 

regulations. 

Sharese Torres
§ 673.13 Certification of compliance. ( a ) Each direct recipient, or State as authorized in § 673.11(d), must certify that it has established a Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan meeting the requirements of this part by the start of operations. A direct recipient must certify that it and all applicable subrecipients are in compliance with the requirements of this part. A State Safety Oversight Agency must review and approve a Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan developed by a rail fixed guideway public transportation system, as authorized in 49 U.S.C. 5329(e) and its implementing regulations at 49 CFR part 674.
( b ) On an annual basis, a direct recipient or State must certify its compliance with this part. A direct recipient must certify that it and all applicable subrecipients are in compliance with the requirements of this part.
**EXHIBIT
      32**


**Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**


**(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
      Code)**





Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of Xvariant, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"),
      does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004
      (the
      "Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
      in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Along Mobile Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Easy Groups Limited
      (formerly Xvariant, Inc.) and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.




Dated:
      January 2, 2007




/s/
                Reed BensonReed
                Benson
                President
                  and
                  Chief
                    Executive Officer





/s/
                Reed BensonReed
                Benson
                Chief
                  Financial Officer




-25-
§ 850.30 Procedures for Coast Guard investigation. ( a ) The Coast Guard conducts an investigation under § 850.25 using the procedures in 46 CFR 4.01-1 through 4.23-1.
( b ) The Board may designate a person or persons to participate in every phase of an investigation, including on-scene investigation, that is conducted under the provisions of § 850.25.
( c ) Consistent with Coast Guard responsibility to direct the course of the investigation, the person or persons designated by the Board under paragraph (b) of this section may: ( 1 ) Make recommendations about the scope of the investigation.
( 2 ) Call and examine witnesses.
( 3 ) Submit or request additional evidence.
( d ) The Commandant provides a record of the proceedings to the Board of an investigation of a major marine casualty under paragraph (a) of this section.
( e ) The Board, under the Act, makes its determination of the facts, conditions, and circumstances, and the cause or probable cause of a major marine casualty, using the record of the proceedings provided by the Commandant under paragraph (d) of this section and any additional evidence the Board may acquire under its own authority.
( f ) An investigation by the Coast Guard under this section is both an investigation under the Act and under R.S. 4450 (46 U.S.C. 239).
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 363 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 10, 2002.
Whereas the State of Utah hosted the world during the largest and most 
        successful Olympic Winter Games ever held;
Whereas the people of Utah opened their hearts and their homes to the athletes 
        of the world and represented the Nation well to the world community;
Whereas the Salt Lake Organizing Committee, its president, Mitt Romney, and its 
        chairman, Robert Garff did a spectacular job in staging a great Winter 
        Olympics with class, dignity, and a proper focus on the athletic 
        competition;
Whereas 2,535 athletes, from a record 78 countries, prepared with unmatched 
        dedication, competed with unrivaled courage, and inspired the world with 
        their spirit of peaceful competition;
Whereas African-American and Mexican-American athletes won medals for the first 
        time in Winter Olympics history;
Whereas over 500 athletes from 36 nations competed in the 2002 Paralympic Winter 
        Games, also held in Salt Lake City, and reminded the world that physical 
        challenges are no limit to human achievement;
Whereas the 211 members of the United States Olympic Team won a Winter Olympics 
        record 34 medals, including a record 10 gold medals, and gave a grateful 
        Nation another new group of heroes at a time when the Nation has 
        rediscovered the true meaning of heroism;
Whereas the silent heroes, over 7,000 members of Federal, State, and local law 
        enforcement and public safety agencies, and over 5,400 brave members of 
        the Armed Forces continued their selfless service to ensure the Winter 
        Olympics were safe and secure for athletes and spectators alike;
Whereas over 19,500 Utahns and other United States citizens volunteered their 
        time and talents to show the world the best that the United States has 
        to offer; and
Whereas the 2002 Olympic Winter Games accomplished the principles set forth by 
        the Olympic movement, including the aim to ``encourage the Olympic 
        spirit of peace and harmony, which brings the people from across the 
        world together around Olympic sport'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates the people of 
Utah, the Salt Lake Organizing Committee, the United States Olympic Team, and 
the athletes of the world for an outstanding and inspiring 2002 Olympic Winter 
Games, and thanks the thousands of law enforcement and public safety personnel, 
military servicemen and women, and volunteers who contributed so much to ensure 
the Winter Olympics were safe, secure, and friendly.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
----

(2004/C 88 E/0030)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-1384/03

by Gian Gobbo (NI) to the Commission

(8 April 2003)

Subject:   Turkish occupation of Iraqi Kurdistan

Following the outbreak of war in Iraq, Turkey has announced its intention of sending troops to occupy a 20-kilometre zone inside Iraqi Kurdistan, which enjoys semi-autonomous status. The NATO authorities have agreed to this decision. This military occupation — ostensibly on humanitarian grounds — is opposed by the Kurdish population and its political representatives, who have clearly rejected it on several occasions and plan to use armed resistance.

What is the Commission's position on what is yet another show of force by Turkey?

Could the presence of Turkish troops in Kurdistan not be a prelude to an annexation of territory there?

Does the Commission not think that such behaviour on the part of Turkey is incompatible with its status of an applicant country for accession to the EU?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(21 May 2003)

The European Council has committed the Union to the territorial integrity of Iraq and respect for the rights of all Iraqis including those of its minorities. Furthermore, it called on all countries of the region to refrain from actions that could lead to further instability. In this respect, any unilateral Turkish intervention in Iraq would have to be considered in the context of Turkey's candidate status for EU accession.

The Commission is aware that Turkey has confirmed its commitment to the territorial integrity of Iraq and that the Turkish Parliament had authorised the possible deployment of troops in northern Iraq, in order to defend against attack on its territory, refugees influx and terrorist activities from PKK-KADEK. On 10 April the United States Secretary of State Colin Powell and Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul agreed that the United States would ensure the Iraqi Kurds did not take control of Kirkuk while Turkey could send a small group of monitors, to help prevent conflict. This arrangement was proposed as a means to contribute to the overall stability of the situation.

----