alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jan. 23: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL in Syria and Iraq
 By CJTF - Operation Inherent Resolve News Release
  January 23, 2015 Release # 2015023FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **SOUTHWEST ASIA -**
 On Jan. 22, U.S. and Coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL
 terrorists in Syria, using attack, bomber, and fighter aircraft to 
conduct 12 airstrikes. Separately, U.S. and Coalition military forces 
conducted 13 airstrikes in Iraq, using attack, bomber, and fighter 
aircraft against ISIL terrorists. All strikes took place between 8 a.m.,
 Jan. 22, and 8 a.m., Jan. 23, local time. The following is a summary of the strikes conducted since the last press release: **Syria***
  Near Kobani, 10 airstrikes struck six ISIL tactical units and a large 
ISIL unit and destroyed 12 ISIL fighting positions and an ISIL vehicle.*  Near Ar Raqqah, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL trailer.*  Near Al Hasakah, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL mobile oil drilling rig. **Iraq***
  Near Al Asad*, three airstrikes struck two ISIL tactical units, a 
large ISIL unit, and an ISIL vehicle, and destroyed an ISIL IED and two 
ISIL vehicles.*  Near Mosul, eight airstrikes struck three ISIL 
tactical units and a large ISIL unit and destroyed seven ISIL vehicles, 
two ISIL VBIEDs, an ISIL bulldozer, four ISIL buildings, an ISIL 
artillery system, an ISIL heavy weapon system, two ISIL armored 
vehicles, an ISIL shipping container, and an ISIL bunker.*  Near Sinjar, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL building.*  Near Tal Afar, an airstrike struck a large ISIL unit and destroyed an ISIL building and an ISIL vehicle. Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely. The
 strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the 
operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose
 to Iraq, Syria, the region, and the wider international community. The 
destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the 
terrorist group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. 
Coalition nations conducting airstrikes in Iraq include the U.S., 
Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Netherlands, and the United
 Kingdom. Coalition nations conducting airstrikes in Syria include the 
U.S., Bahrain, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, J. Bruce Robinson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of Zygo Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June
30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Zygo Corporation.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Zygo Corporation and will be retained by Zygo Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                        By: /s/ J. Bruce Robinson
                                        Name: J. Bruce Robinson
                                        Title: Chairman, President and Chief
                                               Executive Officer

     I, Walter A. Shephard, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of Zygo Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June
30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Zygo Corporation.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Zygo Corporation and will be retained by Zygo Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                        By: /s/ Walter A. Shephard
                                        Name: Walter A. Shephard
                                        Title: Vice President, Finance and Chief
                                               Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James E. Kelley, Appellant, and twenty-six others.

Convictions affirmed. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 12
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 12
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 12
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 12
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 12
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 12
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 12
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 12
EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 12
EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 12
EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 12
EPA SANITIZED Page 12 of 12
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Silverado Gold Mines
Ltd. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending November 30, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Garry L. Anselmo, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.

Date: February 28, 2008

By: /s/ Garry L. AnselmoGarry L.
Anselmo, Chief Executive Officer

---
#### Alfred J. Griswold, appellant, v. Effie Robinson et al., appellees.

Filed November 10, 1920.

No. 20957.

Appeal: Failure to File Answer. Where an action is tried upon the theory that an answer and reply have been filed, the failure to file the answer is not alone ground for reversal.

Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: Leonard A. Flansburg, Judge.

*Affirmed as*modified.

O. *B. Clark,*for appellant.

*W. T. Stevens, contra.*

Letton, J.

The purpose of this action is to obtain an injunction restraining defendants from trespassing upon certain property leased to the plaintiff by defendant, Effie Robinson, and from annoying plaintiff and his wife.

The facts are that Mrs. Robinson leased to plaintiff for one year a house and tract of land adjoining the residence in which Mrs. Robinson lived with her family. On the leased premises were situated a garage, well, and toilet.After plaintiff had taken possession of the premises the defendants insisted that, although the written lease made no reservation of these appurtenances, they were in fact reserved under an oral agreement which it was agreed was to be inserted in the lease after Mrs. Robinson-recovered from *183an attack of illness. Defendants continued to go upon the premises and use the appurtenances contrary to the express wishes of the plaintiff.

The district court found for defendants, and gave them affirmative relief by reforming the lease and enjoining the plaintiff from interfering with their access to and use of the toilet and well. It is contended by plaintiff that there was no justification for this decree since no answer was ever filed. The bill of exceptions shows that the case was tried as if an answer had'been filed. It was stipulated by both parties “that the cause shall be tried and the pleadings made up as if the plaintiff had filed a reply to the defendant’s answer, denying each and every allegation of new matter contained in said answer.” It is not shown that the decree does not respond to the issues.

The evidence supports the decree as to the use of the well and toilet, and it is so far affirmed. It is shown that one of defendants pleaded guilty to disturbing the peace and threatening to injure plaintiff. This, with other evidence, convinces us that the plaintiff was entitled to an injunction restraining defendants from interfering with his' quiet enjoyment of the garage, and from being annoyed and disturbed by the rude and boisterous language and conduct of the male defendants. So far the decree is reversed and such an injunction allowed to plaintiff.

The decree of the district court is modified accordingly, and it is adjudged that each party pay one half the costs in both courts.

Affirmed as modified.

Aldrich and Flansburg, JJ., not sitting.
# Journal officiel C 151/8 ju

| | ISSN 1725-2431 |
| --- | --- |
| Journal officiel
  de l'Union européenne | C 151 |
| | |
| Édition de langue française | Communications et informations | 47e année8 juin 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2431

Journal officiel

de l'Union européenne

C 151

Édition de langue française

Communications et informations

47e année8 juin 2004

---

| Numéro d'information | Sommaire | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Communications |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 151/1 | Taux de change de l'euro | 1 |

Numéro d'information

Sommaire

page

I   Communications

Commission

2004/C 151/1

Taux de change de l'euro

1

| FR | |
| --- | --- |

FR

---

I Communications

Commission

| 8.6.2004 | FR | Journal officiel de l'Union européenne | C 151/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2004

FR

Journal officiel de l'Union européenne

C 151/1

---

Taux de change de l'euro (1)

7 juin 2004

(2004/C 151/01)

1 euro=

| | Monnaie | Taux de change |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | dollar des États-Unis | 1,2319 |
| JPY | yen japonais | 135,36 |
| DKK | couronne danoise | 7,4335 |
| GBP | livre sterling | 0,67025 |
| SEK | couronne suédoise | 9,1333 |
| CHF | franc suisse | 1,5242 |
| ISK | couronne islandaise | 87,33 |
| NOK | couronne norvégienne | 8,1860 |
| BGN | lev bulgare | 1,9558 |
| CYP | livre chypriote | 0,58300 |
| CZK | couronne tchèque | 31,270 |
| EEK | couronne estonienne | 15,6466 |
| HUF | forint hongrois | 251,75 |
| LTL | litas lituanien | 3,4528 |
| LVL | lats letton | 0,6638 |
| MTL | lire maltaise | 0,4266 |
| PLN | zloty polonais | 4,6492 |
| ROL | leu roumain | 40 803 |
| SIT | tolar slovène | 239,1400 |
| SKK | couronne slovaque | 39,950 |
| TRL | lire turque | 1 816 967 |
| AUD | dollar australien | 1,7521 |
| CAD | dollar canadien | 1,6592 |
| HKD | dollar de Hong Kong | 9,6024 |
| NZD | dollar néo-zélandais | 1,9569 |
| SGD | dollar de Singapour | 2,0996 |
| KRW | won sud-coréen | 1 427,96 |
| ZAR | rand sud-africain | 7,9842 |

Monnaie

Taux de change

USD

dollar des États-Unis

1,2319

JPY

yen japonais

135,36

DKK

couronne danoise

7,4335

GBP

livre sterling

0,67025

SEK

couronne suédoise

9,1333

CHF

franc suisse

1,5242

ISK

couronne islandaise

87,33

NOK

couronne norvégienne

8,1860

BGN

lev bulgare

1,9558

CYP

livre chypriote

0,58300

CZK

couronne tchèque

31,270

EEK

couronne estonienne

15,6466

HUF

forint hongrois

251,75

LTL

litas lituanien

3,4528

LVL

lats letton

0,6638

MTL

lire maltaise

0,4266

PLN

zloty polonais

4,6492

ROL

leu roumain

40 803

SIT

tolar slovène

239,1400

SKK

couronne slovaque

39,950

TRL

lire turque

1 816 967

AUD

dollar australien

1,7521

CAD

dollar canadien

1,6592

HKD

dollar de Hong Kong

9,6024

NZD

dollar néo-zélandais

1,9569

SGD

dollar de Singapour

2,0996

KRW

won sud-coréen

1 427,96

ZAR

rand sud-africain

7,9842

---

(1)

Source: taux de change de référence publié par la Banque centrale européenne.

---
§ 601.30 Hearings. ( a ) Sections 556 and 557 of Title 5, United States Code, do not apply to hearings held under this part. Unless otherwise specified, hearings held under this part are informal, non-adversary, fact-finding procedures at which there are no formal pleadings or adverse parties. Any rule issued in a case in which an informal hearing is held is not necessarily based exclusively on the record of the hearing.
( b ) The Administrator designates a representative to conduct any hearing held under this part. The Chief Counsel of the Federal Transit Administration designates a member of his/her staff to serve as legal officer at the hearing.
EXHIBIT 21

                   SUBSIDIARIES OF ZYGO CORPORATION (DELAWARE)

Zygo Credit Corporation (Delaware)
100% owned by Registrant

Zygo International Sales Corporation (U.S. Virgin Islands)
100% owned by Registrant

Technical Instrument Company (California)
100% owned by Registrant (effective as of August 8, 1996)

Syncotec Neue Technologien und Instrumente GmbH
100% owned by Technical Instrument Company (effective as of September 1, 1997)

NexStar Corporation (Colorado)
100% owned by Registrant (effective as of September 12, 1996)

TechniStar Corporation (Delaware)
25% owned by NexStar Corporation

Sight Systems, Inc. (California)
100% owned by Registrant (effective as of August 19, 1997)

Zygo TeraOptix (Delaware)
100% owned by Registrant (effective as of May 5, 2000)

Zygo KK
100% owned by Registrant (effective as of October 1, 1999)

Zygo PTE
100% owned by Registrant (effective as of January 1, 1998)

ZygoLOT GmbH
60% owned by Registrant (effective as of October 2, 1999)

Six Brookside Drive (Connecticut)
100% owned by Registrant (effective as of January 9, 1998)
-------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of 1 

AUG 2 a 2010 

LEGAL PROCE ' 

PUBLICATION l~gJIVISION BRANCH LATIONS As of: August 20, 2010 

Received: August 09, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 20, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2cb67 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, ~WlO 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 


Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathel-ed 


Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 


Comment On: IRS-201O-0010-0001 


Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 


a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 


Document: IRS-201O-0010-0188 


Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 


Submitter Information 

Name: robert clark 


Address: 


Quincy, MA, 


Organization: clark chiropractic 


General Comment 

As a doctor of chiropractic, I am asking that HHS develop strict criteria for insurance companies 


to obtain a grandfather status to ensure that the majority of Americans can benefit from non 


discrimination and other important provisions of the PPACA (patient protection and affordable 


care act). 


Thanks for your consideration. 


Dr. Robert Clark (chiropractor). 


https:/ Ifdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency Icomponent/submitter InfoCoverPage ?Call=... 8/20/2010
#### Henry Dale Murray and George Elliott Chaffin, Plaintiffs in Error, *v.*The State of Delaware, Defendant in Error.

*(September*14, 1951.)

Southerland, Chief Justice, Wolcott, Justice, and Herrmann, J., sitting.

*Everett F. Warrington*for plaintiffs in error.

*328
      *John J. McNeilly,*Deputy Attorney-General, for the State.

Supreme Court,

No. 2,

May Session, 1951.

Per Curiam.

Jurisdiction'to issue writs of error in criminal causes is conferred upon this court by *Section*11 *of Article IV of the Constitution*and is limited to causes in which the sentence shall be death, imprisonment exceeding one month, or fine exceeding $100. There has been, as yet, no trial and conviction of the plaintiffs in error and, accordingly, review by writ of error of the ruling upholding the indictment at this time is premature.

Plaintiffs in error contend, however, that in a proper case a writ of error may be considered as a writ of *certiorari*and review of interlocutory rulings be had at an intermediate stage of a criminal cause. The argument is based upon the contention that the common law writ of *certiorari*is a discretionary writ and thus may be utilized to review interlocutory rulings. Irrespective of the nature of the common law writ of *certiorari, Section*4264, *R. C.*1935 provides that writs of *certiorari*issuable out of this court shall bfe writs of right and not of grace. The effect of this statute is to place writs of *certiorari*in the same category as writs of error, particularly with respect to the necessity for final judgment below prior to review by this court. The consistent practice in this state has been to make no distinction between writs of error and writs of *certiorari*with respect to the requirement of finality of the judgment sought to be reviewed. *King, Adm’x v. Wright, Adm’r,*2 *Harr.*135; *Vaughan v. Marshall,*1 *Houst.*348; *Johnson v. State,*6 *Penn.*450, 67 *A.*785; 1 *Woolley Delaware Practice,*§ 624; *Rule*48 of this court.

*329The motion to dismiss the writ of error is granted.
------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------

1; 2 (1 

f LBGAt PROCESSING DIVISION 

PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS 

BRANCH 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION 

Docket: IRS-2010~001O 

Page 1 of 1 

As of: August 20, 2010 

Received: August 09, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 20, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2cc28 

Comments Due: August 16, 2)10 

Submission Type: Web 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathen=d 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS~2010-0010~0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS~2010-0010-0250 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: Peggy Rose Shapiro 

Address: 

4565 Quail Lakes Dr 


Ste A-l 


Stockton, CA, 95207 


Email: peggy@shapchiro.com 

Phone: 209-888~8602 

Fax: 1-866-219-5623 

Organization: HealthSource of Stockton 

---------------------------------------------------------------,--­

General Comment 

See attached file(s) 

Attachments 

IRS-2010-0010-02S0.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

https:llfdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency/componentlsubmitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/20/2010 
August 9,2010 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Ai;t 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-20 1 0­

0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PP ACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grand fathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these 

regulations. 

Peggy Shapiro
§ 821.6 Appearances and rights of witnesses. ( a ) Any party to a proceeding may appear and be heard in person, or by an attorney or other representative designated by that party. Upon hearing, and for good cause shown, the Board may suspend or bar any person from practicing before it.
( b ) Any person appearing in any proceeding governed by this part may be accompanied, represented and advised, and may be examined by, his or her own counsel or representative.
( c ) Any person who submits data or evidence in a proceeding governed by this part may, by timely request, procure a copy of any document submitted by him or her, or a copy of any transcript made of his or her testimony, on payment of reasonable costs. Original documents, data or evidence may be retained by a party upon permission of the law judge or the Board, upon substitution of a copy thereof.
( d ) Any party to a proceeding who is represented by an attorney or representative shall, in a separate written document, notify the Board of the name, address and telephone number of that attorney or representative. In the event of a change in representation or a withdrawal of representation, the party shall immediately, in a separate written document, notify the Board (in the manner provided in § 821.7) and the other parties to the proceeding (pursuant to § 821.8), before the new attorney or representative may participate in the proceeding in any way. Parties, and their attorneys and representatives, must notify the Board immediately of any changes in their contact information.
[68 FR 22625, Apr. 29, 2003, as amended at 77 FR 63251, Oct. 16, 2012]