alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2



                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Artesyn Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 27, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard J. Thompson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and result of
                operations of the Company.


/s/ Richard J. Thompson
------------------------------------------
Richard J. Thompson
Chief Financial Officer
March 26, 2003
ATTACHMENT 1

Information Provided by PSNC During Site Visit




ATTACHMENT 2

PHOTOGRAPHS OF EQUIPMENT TAKEN

DURING SITE TOUR
Figure 1. Valve and actuator Figure 2. Filter separator

Figure 3. Filter waste storage tank Figure 4. Compressor blowdown
Figure 5. Gas heater Figure 6. Cooling tower

Figure 7. Suction/discharge headers Figure 8. Compressor exhaust stack
Figure 9. Compressor intake manifold Figure 10. Compressor intake filter

Figure 11. Compressor exhaust base Figure 12. SOLAR Saturn Compressor

Figure 13. Electric Generator 
ATTACHMENT 3

PSNC NCDENR AIR QUALITY PERMIT

NO. 09797R00





















ATTACHMENT 4

Email Confirmation that no CBI was discussed
From: "SIEVERS, ROBERT" <RSIEVERS@SCANA.com>

To: Jodi Howard/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/24/2010 08:02 AM

Subject: RE: PSNC Energy Station Visit

Jodi,

No confidential information was disclosed by PSNC.

Bob

-----Original Message-----

From: Howard.Jodi@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Howard.Jodi@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 7:56 AM

To: SIEVERS, ROBERT

Subject: Re: PSNC Energy Station Visit

Bob,

Thank you for accommodating us yesterday. The supplemental information

that you provided is very useful.

For clarification purposes, was anything that was discussed during our

site visit considered confidential business information?

Thanks.

************************************************************

Jodi Howard, Environmental Engineer

U.S. EPA - Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Sector Policies and Program Divisions

Coatings and Chemicals Group

Mail Code: E143-01

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone: 919-541-4607 Fax: 919-541-0246
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1

                        VISTA MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Data

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                        THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30         SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31
                                                       -----------------------------     ------------------------------
                                                            1999             1998             1999              1998
                                                       -----------------------------     ------------------------------
<S>                                                    <C>              <C>              <C>
Net income (loss) .................................    $ (3,289,139)     $(5,614,202)    $  (5,958,470)     $ (9,781,408)

Weighted average common shares outstanding.........      13,605,782       13,289,121        13,537,059        13,265,196
                                                       -------------     ------------    -------------      ------------
Shares used in basic and diluted loss per share....      13,605,782       13,289,121        13,537,059        13,265,196
                                                       -------------     ------------    -------------      ------------
Basic and diluted loss per share...................    $      (0.24)     $     (0.42)    $       (0.44)     $      (0.74)
                                                       =============     ============    =============      ============

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioner

v.

JOSHUA HEADLEY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 716 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18th day of May, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
# Oct. 23: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL in Syria and Iraq

/ Published Oct. 23, 2014

October 23, 2014

Release #20141027FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla., Oct. 23, 2014** — U.S. military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria Wednesday and today using fighter and bomber aircraft to conduct six airstrikes.  Separately, U.S. and partner nation military forces conducted nine airstrikes Wednesday and today using fighter, attack and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL terrorists in Iraq.

In Syria, four airstrikes near Kobani destroyed ISIL fighting positions, an ISIL vehicle, and an ISIL command and control center.  East of Dawr Az Zawr, two airstrikes destroyed ISIL oil holding tanks.  In Iraq, four airstrikes south of the Mosul Dam struck four small ISIL units and destroyed an ISIL vehicle.  South of Bayji, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL fighting position.  Three airstrikes south of Fallujah destroyed an ISIL building and struck a large ISIL unit.  Finally, near Fallujah, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL training facility. All aircraft departed the strike areas safely. Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports.

The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the terrorist group ISIL and the threat they pose to Iraq, the region and the wider international community.  The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group's ability to project power and conduct operations.
, ' 

August 11,2010 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 


Department of Health and Human Services 


Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 


P.O. Box 8016 


Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 


Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Below are my comments regarding the Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health 


Insurance Coverage Relating to Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient 


__ ~otectionandAffor9abkCareAct(PPACA)._ . ~." ,- -.-~. --. .'.,- ~~~,' 

I believe that every effort should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by 

PPACA, especially as of January 1,2014 when most ofthe reform components (Insurance 

Exchanges, Subsidies, Tax Credits, etc.) come into play. . 

The average consumer has a broad definition of "benefits." Consumers view their health plan 


beyond the covered benefits, cost sharing, and the contribution levels associated with the plan. 


It is my opinion that the Rule may still result in some confusion to the marketplace in its 


application. For example, if an employer raised the copayment level beyond the maximum in ORe 


area (Le. outpatient services) but retained the copayment level for primary care doctor visits, 


does that mean a loss of grandfather status? Clarity will be critical both for the employer and the 
 't 

employee. 

Even by the most optimistic estimates, a substantial portion ofthe employee population will 


remain outside the PPACA as of January 2014 based on the current rules. While I understand the 


difficulty involved in making change, creating another large sub-population of excluded 


individuals will only add to costs, increase confusion, and mitigate the potential impact of the 


legislation. 


The Rule needs to be clear, reasonable, and with no ambiguities involved in determining whether 


a group liealth plan is'''in or out;" The declsions'the-fe"deral"governmefinnakes toaay will' ~ 

determine the outcomes for tomorrow. We may need to make some difficult decisions to create 


a sustainable health care system that will support a growing economy in the future. That means 


gettiIlg as t;I1any citizens across the country participating at the beginning to make it work and 


delivering on its promises to retain their support. 


Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this regulation. 

Cherri L. Vail
# Aug. 30: Military airstrikes continue against ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published Aug. 30, 2015

August 30, 2015Release # 20150830FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**SOUTHWEST ASIA -** On Aug. 29, coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq. In Syria, coalition military forces conducted seven airstrikes using attack, fighter and remotely piloted aircraft. Separately in Iraq, coalition military forces conducted 13 airstrikes coordinated with the government of Iraq using attack, bomber, fighter, fighter-attack and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL targets.The following is a summary of the strikes conducted against ISIL since the last press release:**Syria*** Near Al Hawl, one airstrike struck three ISIL fighting positions.* Near Ar Raqqah, one airstrike struck an ISIL facility.* Near Kobani, four airstrikes struck two ISIL tactical units and three ISIL excavators and destroyed five ISIL motorcycles, three ISIL structures, two ISIL guard shacks, two ISIL excavators and an ISIL vehicle.* Near Washiyah, one airstrike had inconclusive results.**Iraq*** Near Bayji, two airstrikes struck an ISIL large tactical unit and an ISIL heavy machine gun firing position and destroyed seven ISIL buildings, two ISIL heavy machine guns and an ISIL weapons cache.* Near Habbaniyah, one airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit.* Near Kisik, one airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL fighting position and an ISIL heavy machine gun.* Near Ramadi, five airstrikes struck three ISIL staging areas and destroyed two ISIL vehicles.* Near Sinjar, one airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed two ISIL fighting positions.* Near Tuz, three airstrikes struck two ISIL tactical units and destroyed four ISIL vehicles, two ISIL fighting positions and an ISIL mortar position.Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely.The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria and the wider international community.The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Iraq include Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Syria include Bahrain, Canada, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates and the U.S.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

CHRISTOPHER CAMPBELL

,

Defendant Below

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE

,

Appellee. §

§ No. 1 51 , 202 3

§

§ Court Below

– Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ Cr. ID No. 2109013696 (S)

§

§

§

§

Submitted: June 27 , 202 3

Decided: July 7 , 202 3

ORDER

On June 6, 2023 , the Senior Court Clerk issued a notice, sent by certified mail,

directing the appellant, Christopher Campbell , to show cause why his appeal should

not be dismissed for his failure to pay the Supreme Court filing fee or file a motion

to proceed in forma pauperis

. Campbell received the notice , as evidenced by the

return receipt that was filed with the Court on Jun e 15, 2023

. A timely response to

the notice to show cause was due on or before June 26 , 202 3 . To date, Campbell

has not paid the Supreme Court filing fee, filed a motion to proceed in forma

pauperis , or responded to the notice to show cause. Dismissal of this action is

therefore deemed to be unopposed.2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme Court

Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b), that the appeal be DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice
#### § 538.9 Dual fuel vehicle incentive.

The application of 49 U.S.C. 32905(b) and (d) to qualifying dual fuel vehicles is extended to the 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008 model years.

[69 FR 7703, Feb. 19, 2004]
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

 38

 40

 42

 44

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

07/31

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.81 N 76.74 W Meters AGL
Aug. 29: U.S. Military Conducts Airstrikes Against ISIL Near Mosul Dam
 By U.S. Central Command News Release
  August 29, 2014 Release #20140832FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **TAMPA, Fla., Aug. 29, 2014 -**
 U.S. military forces continued to attack  ISIL terrorists in support of
 Iraqi security force operations, using fighter and attack aircraft to 
conduct four airstrikes in the vicinity of the Mosul Dam. The 
strikes destroyed four ISIL armed vehicles, severely damaged another 
armed vehicle, and destroyed three ISIL support vehicles.  All aircraft 
exited the strike areas safely. The strikes were conducted under 
the authority to support Iraqi security force and Kurdish defense force 
operations, as well as to protect critical infrastructure, U.S. 
personnel and facilities, and support humanitarian efforts. Since Aug. 8, U.S. Central Command has conducted a total of 110 airstrikes across Iraq.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ERIC ALLEN,

Petitioner

v.

SECURITY MAJOR JOHN DOE 

NEWBERRY, ET AL.,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 751 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Diikitiko Protodikio Ioanninon by decision of that court of 26 November 2003 in the case of Carrefour Marinopoulos AE against (1) Elliniko Dimosio and (2) Nomarkhiaki Aftodiikisi Ioanninon

(Case C-159/04)

(2004/C 106/84)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by decision of the Diikitiko Protodikio Ioanninon (Administrative Court of First Instance, Ioannina) of 26 November 2003, received at the Court Registry on 29 March 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Carrefour Marinopoulos AE against (1) Elliniko Dimosio (Greek State) and (2) Nomarkhiaki Aftodiikisi Ioanninon (Prefectural Authority of Ioannina) on the following questions:

----
§ 825.5 Notice of appeal. ( a ) A party may appeal from the Commandant's decision sustaining an order of revocation, suspension, or denial of a license, certificate, document, or register in proceedings described in § 825.1, by filing a notice of appeal with the Board within 10 days after service of the Commandant's decision upon the party or his designated attorney. Upon good cause shown, the time for filing may be extended.
( b ) Notice of appeal shall be addressed to the Docket Clerk, National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, DC 20594. At the same time, a copy shall be served on the Commandant (GL), U.S. Coast Guard, Washington, DC 20590.
( c ) The notice of appeal shall state the name of the party, the number of the Commandant's decision, and, in brief, the grounds for the appeal.
From: Susan Grunin

Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2015 9:38 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Cc: Susan K. Grunin

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Please go forward with rule change to ensure that people are given financial advice that is in their best 

interests and not the financial institution that they represent. Thank you. Dr. Grunin , CEO TSC
----

----

I Informācija

Komisija

----

Eiro maiņas kurss (1)

2004. gada 31. maijs

(2004/C 145/01)

1 eiro= 

----

(1)

Datu avots: atsauces maiņas kursu publicējusi ECB.

----

----

Iepriekšējs paziņojums par koncentrāciju

(Lieta Nr. COMP/M.3090 - VOLKSWAGEN/Offset/Crescent/Lease Plan/JV)

(2004/C 145/02)

(Dokuments attiecas uz EEZ)

----

(1)OV L 24, 29.1.2004., 1. lpp.

----
#### § 594.3 Applicability.

This part applies to any person who applies to NHTSA to be granted the status of Registered Importer under part 592 of this chapter, to any person who has been granted such status, to any manufacturer not a Registered Importer who petitions the Administrator for a determination pursuant to part 593 of this chapter, and to any person who imports a motor vehicle into the United States pursuant to such determination.

[55 FR 40667, Oct. 4, 1990]
**Exhibit32**

**CERTIFICATIONSOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER ANDPRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VistaMedical Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, John R. Lyon, President, Chief Executive Officer andDirector of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

2. That information contained in the Quarterly Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

Date: August 16, 2004
|   |   | /s/ John R. Lyon                    |   |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |   | John R. Lyon                        |   |   |
|   |   | President, Chief Executive  Officer |   |   |
|   |   | and Director                        |   |   |

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VistaMedical Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Howard Sampson,Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

2. That information contained in the Quarterly Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

Date: August 16, 2004
|   |   | /s/ Howard Sampson                     |   |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |   | Howard  Sampson                        |   |   |
|   |   | Vice President of Finance,             |   |   |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer  and Secretary |   |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT
32





Certification
of Periodic Report by the Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant
to, and for purposes only of, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned hereby certifies
that (i) the Quarterly Report of Shore Bancshares, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Shore Bancshares, Inc.





Date:
      May 7, 2010
                  BY:
                  /s/ W. Moorhead VermilyeW.
      Moorhead VermilyePresident/Chief
      Executive OfficerDate:
      May 7, 2010
                  BY:
                  /s/ Susan E. LeavertonSusan
      E. Leaverton, CPATreasurer/Principal
      Accounting Officer
https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=...

REC- /4¥631-04 Page | of 2

LEGAL PROCESSING DIV, FEB
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS zoe
BRANCH

As of: February 23, 2010
Status: Posted
PUBLIC SUBMISSION [restes: ervey 23.20%
|Comments Due: May 03, 2010]
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0006
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants & Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Comment On: IRS-2010-0006-0001
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Document: IRS-2010-0006-0041
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-02028

Submitter Information

Name: Matthew Thomas Walter
Address:

5204 Nanticoke Court

Centreville, VA, 20120
Submitter's Representative: None
Organization: None

General Comment

To whom it may concern,

At a time when Social Security and Medicare are quickly becoming insolvent, many Americans
such as myself have turned to individual retirement accounts as a way to provide for our own
retirement. Frankly, most Americans under the age of 45 do not believe Social Security benfits
will be provided to them. So now we have this proposed arrangement where individuals will have
the option to move private funds to yet another federal pool of money - one that will certainly not
be saved by Congress, nor spent as we intended.

The problem with the logic of the "optional" rollover to these fixed income streams the
Government would promise is twofold: (i) the Government has already made such promises
(Social Security) and looks increasingly unable to meet their long term obligations to provide
future benefits; and (ii) private investors already have the option to buy T-Bills and other
Government securities as a part (or all) of their retirement savings portfolio. It says all you need
to know that investors currently choose NOT to do so, as the national debt is making such "safe"
investments in Government securities increasingly unappealing.

Were I cynical, I'd think that this proposed rule is just a way to get Government's foot in the door
- a first step toward a mandatory re-investment of 401(k) and other IRAs into a Government-run
retirement scheme destined to collapse under its own weight.

2/23/2010


Page 2 of 2

This rule is being floated at a time when demand for Government securities is slackening, at a
time when annual deficits are skyrocketing, and during an administration that has shown no
hesitation in nationalizing and socializing any number of areas of our otherwise private sector
(banks, autos, healthcare).

This rule is an obvious first step toward the mandatory re-investment of private savings accounts
into an area where the Government can spend it - just as they have our Social Security trust
fund.

No thank you. Hands off the 401Ks.

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=..._ 2/23/2010
EXHIBIT 23





                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
  Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-42543 dated August 30, 1991)
  pertaining to the Cognitronics Corporation 1967 Employee Stock
  Purchase Plan, the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.
  33-42544 dated August 30, 1991 and Form S-8 No. 333-05897 dated
  June 13, 1996) pertaining to the Cognitronics Corporation 1990
  Stock Option Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
  333-05899 dated June 13, 1996) pertaining to the Cognitronics
  Corporation Restricted Stock Plan of our report dated March 4,
  2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
  Cognitronics Corporation and subsidiaries included in this
  Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.



                                               /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



  Stamford, Connecticut
  March 28, 2002