# State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan

For the Year 2011

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Division Air Assessment Section 

## Final Report August 2, 2011

Publication Number EQR 11-02

### Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... ..................5 2.0 ADEQ PROGRAM AND NETW ORK DESCRIPTIONS....................................................................7
2.1 NAAQS COMPLIANCE NETWORK............................................................................................7

2.1.1 CHANGES TO THE NAAQS................................................................................................7 2.2 STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SIP) AND MAINTENANCE AREA NETWORK...........8

2.3 SOURCE ORIENTED NETWORK................................................................................................8

2.4 NCORE NETWORK ............................................................................................................. ..........9

2.5 METEOROLOGICAL NETWORK................................................................................................9 2.6 PHOTOCHEMICAL ASSESSMENT MONITORING STATIONS (PAMS) ...............................9

2.7 NATIONAL AIR TOXICS TREND SITES (NATTS) .................................................................10

2.8 CHEMICAL SPECIAT ION NETWORK (CSN)..........................................................................10

2.9 CLASS I AREA NETW ORK AND IMPROVE PROGRAM.......................................................10

2.10 AIRNOW REPORTING......................................................................................................... .....11

2.11 URBAN HA ZE NETWORK....................................................................................................... 11

2.12 E-BAM NETWORK OF PM 10 SPECIAL PURPOSE MONITORS .........................................11

3.0 MONITORING NETW ORK EVALUATION....................................................................................12

3.1 SITE CLOSURES............................................................................................................. .............12

3.2 NEW SITES...................................................................................................................................13

3.3 INSTRUME NT CHANGES........................................................................................................ ..13

3.4 SUMMARY OF NETWORK CHANGES....................................................................................15
4.0 ADEQ MONITORI NG NETWORKS.................................................................................................16

4.1 PM 2.5 MONITORING NETWOR K REQUIREMENTS ..............................................................16 4.1.1 COMPLIANCE WITH 40CFR PART 58.10(c)...................................................................17

4.2 PM 10 MONITORING NETWOR K REQUIREMENTS ...............................................................18

4.3 O 3 MONITORING NETWOR K REQUIREMENTS ...................................................................19

4.3.1 O 3 SEASON ........................................................................................................................ .20

4.4 Pb MONITORING N ETWORK REQUIREMENTS....................................................................21

4.5 SO 2 MONITORING NETWOR K REQUIREMENTS .................................................................22

4.6 NO 2 MONITORING NETWOR K REQUIREMENTS.................................................................22

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 24.7 CO MONITORING N ETWORK REQUI REMENTS ..................................................................23

4.8 PAMS MONITORING N ETWORK REQUIREMENTS .............................................................23

4.9 NCORE MONITORING N ETWORK REQUIREMENTS ..........................................................25

4.10 SIP MONITORING N ETWORK REQUI REMENTS ................................................................26

4.11 SOURCE COMPLIANCE MONITO RING NETWORK REQUIREMENTS ...........................27

4.12 CLASS I VISIBILITY NETWORK............................................................................................28

4.13 URBAN HAZE MONI TORING NETWORK ............................................................................30

4.14 METEOROLOGY MONI TORING NETWORK .......................................................................31
5.0 MONITORING PLAN QUAL ITY ASSURANCE.............................................................................32
5.1 THE QUALIT Y SYSTEM ........................................................................................................ ....32
5.1.1 ADEQ QUALITY A SSURANCE STAFF...........................................................................33
5.1.2 ADEQ QUALIT Y DOCUMENTS.......................................................................................34
5.2 MEASUREMENT QUALITY CHECKS – PRECISION AND BIAS MEASUREMENTS........35

5.2.1 PARTICULATE MONITORS – PM 10 .................................................................................35

5.2.2 PARTICULATE MONTIROS – PM 2.5 ................................................................................35

5.2.3 GAS MONITORS – SO 2 , O 3 , CO, NO 2 ..............................................................................36

5.2.4 AIR TOXICS MONITORS ..................................................................................................36
5.2.5 METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT..................................................................................37

5.3 CALCULATIONS AND REPORTING........................................................................................37
5.4 ADEQ AQD AUDIT RE PONSIBILITIES....................................................................................37

5.4.1 INTERNAL TEHNI CAL SYSTEMS AUDITS...................................................................37
5.4.2 ADEQ RANKINGS IN EPA PROGRAM REPORTS.........................................................37

5.4.3 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE DOCUMENT DEVELOPMENT.........................................38

5.5 EPA AUDIT REPONSIBILITIES................................................................................................. 38

5.5.1 PEP AND NPAP AUDITS ...................................................................................................3 8

5.5.2 TECHNICAL SYSTEM AUDITS .......................................................................................38

APPENDIX A DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVI ATIONS.....................................................................39

APPENDIX B N ETWORK MAPS........................................................................................................ .41

APPENDIX C CURRENT MONITORS BY PROGRAMS-NETWORKS-PARAMETERS ...............53

APPENDIX D SITE INFORM ATION DATA TABLES ......................................................................82

APPENDIX E 2011 EPA M ONITORING SC HEDULE .....................................................................134

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 3APPENDIX F BETHUNE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE REMOVAL RATIONALE.................135
APPENDIX G DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT .................................................................137

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 4

### 1.0 INTRODUCTION
This document fulfills the obligation, under the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40, Section 58.10(a), requiring Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) to complete and submit to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) an annual network monitoring plan for the year 2011.

This plan informs EPA (Region 9) of the monitoring activities ADEQ will undertake July 1, 2011 through December 2011. However, some changes may occur after the plan is published and approved due to unforeseen events at monitoring sites, funding changes, or changes in EPA monitoring requirements. Data from ADEQ's monitors are reported to EPA's Air Quality System(AQS) database and to AIRNow. Please refer to ADEQ's Annual Air Quality Report for summaries of these data.

In 40 CFR 51, EPA requires states to create, submit, and adopt State Implementation Plans (SIPs) to address the various issues and responsibilities involved with creating and implementing air quality programs. Subpart J of Part 51 specifies that Part 58 Subpart B contains the requirements for establishing air quality surveillance systems to monitor ambient air quality.

Air quality surveillance systems consist of networks of monitors at carefully-chosen physical locations referred to as sites or stations. Some of the networks, sites, and monitors are:

 State and Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS)

 National Core multipollutant monitoring stations (NCore)

 Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS)

 Chemical Speciation Network (CSN)

 National Air Toxics Trends Sites (NATTS)

 Special Purpose Monitors (SPM)

 Urban Haze monitoring sites

 Interagency Monitoring of PROtected Visual Environments (IMPROVE)

 ADEQ visibility stations located in or near mandatory Class I areas (national parks and wilderness areas). Class I monitoring sites are subject to specific siting and operational guidance developed by the IMPROVE Steering Committee.

 AIRNow information sites

 Source-oriented monitoring sites operated independently by permittees (Industry)

 Meteorological sites This Annual Monitoring Network Plan identifies the purpose(s) of each monitor and provides evidence that both the siting and the operation of each monitor meet the requirements in 40 CFR Part 58 appendices A, C, D, and E as follows:

 Appendix A – Quality Assurance Requirements for SLAMS, SPMs, and Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Air Monitoring

 Appendix C – Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Methodology

 Appendix D – Network Design Criteria for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring

 Appendix E – Probe and Monitoring Path Siting Criteria for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 5Results of the annual network review and planning are used to determ ine how well the network is achieving its required air monitoring objectives, how well it meets data users’ needs, and how it should be modified (through termination of existing stati ons, relocation of stations, establishment of new stations, monitoring of additional parameters, and/or changes to the sampling schedule) in order to continue to meet its objectives and data needs. The network review and planning are performed for the purpose of improving the network and ensuring that it provides adequate, representative, and useful air quality data.

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 6

### 2.0 ADEQ PROGRAM AND NETWORK DESCRIPTIONS

ADEQ operates ambient air quality equipment for a variety of Federal and State monitoring programs. Detailed descriptions of the equipment deployed for each monitoring program are presented in Appendix C. The equipment is grouped by monitoring program or parameter, to easily compare instrument specifics across the networks. Appendix D lists the information about each of ADEQ's 49 monitoring sites, including those sites which ADEQ shares with other agencies or serves as the local site operator. General information about the monitoring programs ADEQ participates in is described in the following sections.

2.1 NAAQS Compliance Network

The largest com pliance network in Arizona consists of monitoring sites operated for the purpose of demonstrating compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards ( NAAQS ) for the “criteria” pollutants: carbon monoxide ( CO ), nitrogen dioxide ( NO 2 ), sulfur dioxide ( SO 2 ), ozone ( O 3 ), particulate matter ( PM 10 and PM 2.5 ), and lead ( Pb ). The criteria pollutants are measured using instruments that have been certified by the EPA as Federal Reference Methods (FRM) or Federal Equivalent Methods (FEM). 40 CFR Part 58 speci fies the minimum requirements for determining NAAQS compliance including the following network and site criteria:

 Number and types of monitors required per metropolitan statistical area (MSA) by pollutant

 Objectives and spatial scales

 Sampling frequency

 Collocation

 Special NCore-related requirements

 Meteorology

 Probe location and other restrictions within a site

 Periodic performance evaluations

 Quality Assurance

 Data reporting

2.1.1 Changes to the NAAQS

Pb - In November 2008, EPA revised the Pb NAAQS from 1.5 μ g/m 3 to 0.15 μ g/m 3 . New requirements for the placement of monitors were added: (1) near Pb sources (by January 1, 2010) having annual ambient air Pb emissions that are expected to exceed one ton and (2) in non-source urban areas (by January 1, 2011) with populations greater than 500,000. In December 2009, EPA proposed revisions to these monitoring requirements. In December 2010, the EPA finalized the Pb monitoring requirements which required Pb monitoring near sources with Pb emissions greater than 0.5 tons. Monitors near these 0.5 to one ton sources are to be operational one year from the date of the final rule. Additionally, the final rule adjusted the non-source monitoring requirement to be limited to NCore sites, as opposed to the 500,000 population requirement mentioned in the or iginal November, 2008 final rule. ADEQ has installed Pb monitors at the Globe Highway site as well as the Miami Golf Course site, effective October, 2010. ADEQ is currently exploring options for Pb monitoring methods at JLG Supersite and will have this monitor installed by December, 2011. The Pb monitoring final rule also clarified that Pb

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 7m onitoring will not be required in the Prescott area, despite Ernest A. Love Field Airport exceeding the 0.5 ton Pb emissions threshold.

O 3 - In March 2008, EPA revised the eight-hour O 3 standard from 0.08 parts per million (ppm) to 0.075 ppm. Monitoring network revisions included the requirement for locating monitors in urban areas with populations between 50,000 and 350,000 and requiring states to operate three non-urban monitors. In January 2010, EPA proposed revisions to the level of the standard, requesting comments on lowering the standard to a level within 0.060 to 0.070 ppm. No changes were proposed for the monitoring requirements. The final O 3 NAAQS will be issued in July 2011.

SO 2 - In June 2010, EPA revised the primary SO 2 standard by establishing a new one-hour standard at a level of 75 parts per billion (ppb). The new form is the three-year average of the 99 th percentile of the annual distribution of daily maximum one-hour con centrations. It is also revoking the two existing primary standards of 140 ppb evaluated over 24 hours and the 30 ppb evaluated over a year. Additionally, the EPA required changes to data reporting requirements to include reporting the maximum five minute concentration for each hour in addition to the hourly averaged concentrations. ADEQ began collecting and processing hourly maximum five minute SO 2 concentrations in July and August, 2010. New monitoring requirements for placement of monitors were also issued, and monitors must be operational by January, 2013. The new monitoring requirements do not result in any SO 2 network changes for ADEQ, as population oriented monitors will be covered by Maricopa and Pima County agencies and the source oriented monitors have been established for years.

NO 2 - In January 2010, EPA set a new one-hour standard for NO 2 of 100 ppb. EPA is retaining the annual standard of 53 ppb. The form of the standard is the three-year average of the 98 th percentile of the annual distribution of daily maximum one-hour aver age concentrations. New monitoring requirements were established including near roadway monitors in urban areas, additional urban monitors in large urban areas, and monitors in areas with populations susceptible to NO 2 related health effects. The new monitoring requirements are not expected to result in any NO 2 network changes for ADEQ, as population oriented monitors and near roadway monitors will be operated by Maricopa and Pima County agencies.

2.2 State Implementation Plan (SIP) and Maintenance Area Network

ADEQ maintains several air monitoring sites for the purpose of tracking compliance in areas that arecurrently not attaining one or more of the NAAQS and in areas where the NAAQS has been met, but ongoing demonstration of compliance is required. Monitoring requirements for these areas are described in their associated SIPs.

2.3 Source Oriented Network

Historically, ADEQ has required several of the major point sources in the state to conduct ambient monitoring for criteria pollutants, primarily PM 10 and SO 2 , in and around the permitted facility. These monitors constitute a subset of the compliance monitoring network described above. ADEQ activities with respect to this network have been limited to performance audits and review of ambient data summaries submitted by the individual sources. Recently, however, SIP support has required the submittal of data by some sources to the AQS, including review of quality assurance documents kept by

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 8the sources to support their am bient monitoring programs. ADEQ continues to work with the permitted facilities to obtain all ambient air quality data that are required to be reported to AQS.

2.4 NCore Network

EPA describes the nationwide NCore network composed of approximately 70 urban and 20 rural sites as a multipollutant network that integrates several advanced measurement systems for particles, pollutant gases, and meteorology. Some of the missions of the NCore network are:

 Tracking long-term trends of criteria and non-criteria pollutants;

 Support for long-term health assessments that contribute to ongoing reviews of the NAAQS;

 Support to scientific studies ranging across technological, health, and atmospheric process disciplines; and

 Support to ecosystem assessments recognizing that national air quality networks benefit ecosystem assessments and, in turn, benefit from data specifically designed to address ecosystem analyses.

As required under 40 CFR Part 58.13, ADEQ’s NCore site (JLG Supersite) was operational by January 1, 2011. All ambient monitoring data required by 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D(3)(b) will be reported to EPA’s AQS database no later than June 30 th , 2011. In addition to the above missions and the NCore monitoring requirements set forth in the CFR, ADEQ will use the JLG Supersite to test new technologies that may be adopted in various ADEQ monitoring networks. Examples would include advanced communications and serial data collection, remote span checks and calibrations, high sensitivity instrumentation, and instruments that monitor pollutants that may be added to the current CFR requirements. Additional NCore information is available from the EPA website: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/ncore/index.html

2.5 Meteorological Network

ADEQ collects meteorological data at sites throughout the state to support the analysis of ambient air quality data and to provide support for exceptional event reporting. Meteorological measurements are also required for the NCore and PAMS networks. ADEQ currently meets the meteorological monitoring requirements for the NCore and PAMS networks. It is a goal of ADEQ to add meteorological instrumentation to most of ADEQ’s monitoring sites that are not currently equipped. Additions will occur as time and funding permits.

2.6 Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS)

Section 182(c)(1) of the 1990 Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments requires the Administrator to promulgate rules for enhanced monitoring of O 3 that includes concurrent monitoring of oxides of nitrogen (NOx), speciated volatile organic co mpounds (VOC), carbonyls, CO, and meteorology to obtain comprehensive and representative O 3 data. Immediately following the promulgation of those rules, the affected states began to implement a program to improve ambient monitoring activities and the monitoring of emissions of NOx and VOCs. Each SIP for the affected areas must contain commitments to implement the appropriate ambient monitoring network for such air pollutants. The subsequent revisions to 40 CFR 58 (1993) required states to establish PAMS as part of their SIP monitoring networks in O 3 non-attainment areas classified as serious, severe, or extreme. The principal reasons for

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 9requiring the collection of additional am bient air pollutant and meteorological data are the widespread non-attainment of the O 3 NAAQS and the need for a more comprehensive air quality database for O 3 and its precursors. ADEQ operates two PAMS sites, JLG Supersite and Queen Valley, to represent the Phoenix metropolitan area.

EPA has recently constructed a workgroup to discu ss the evaluation and possible re-invention of the PAMS program. The scope of the evaluation is extensive and includes PAMS objectives, network design, methods, and quality assurance. ADEQ has been an active participant in the PAMS re-invention process and will follow this activity closely to be aware of possible future implications for the ADEQ PAMS network.

2.7 National Air Toxics Trend Sites (NATTS)

The NATTS network was designed to monitor and record the concentrations of certain air toxics on a national scale. Data from EPA’s national monitoring activities are used to estimate national average concentrations for these air toxics compounds and to detect trends. Using this information, EPA, states, and local agencies can estimate changes in the risks of human exposure. These changes can then be used to support changes in environmental policy. As part of the National Air Toxics Assessment (NATA) process, ambient air quality data are used to assess the national toxics inventory and long-term hazardous air pollutant (HAP) trends. ADEQ accepted federal funding and responsibility for this program in Arizona in 2003. The ADEQ JLG Supersite is the designated NATTS site for the Phoenix metropolitan area.

2.8 Chemical Speciation Network (CSN)

The CSN was established to meet the regulatory requirements for monitoring speciated PM 2.5 to determine the chemical composition of these particles. The purpose of the CSN is to determine, over a period of several years, trends in concentration levels of selected ions, metals, carbon species, and organic compounds in PM 2.5 . The program began in 1999 with 54 Speciation Trends Network (STN) sites across the nation located primarily in or near larger MSAs

. The network has increased to 200 sites nationwide. Monitoring at JLG Supersite includes one STN speciation sampler and two IMPROVE samplers as part of the CSN network. The collocat ed IMPROVE samplers provide precision information for the IMPROVE network and are used for comparison of the speciation results from both programs. In 2009, a URG 3000N carbon sampler was added and data from that sampler was then used in place of the data from the Met One SASS carbon channel. This substitution was made as part of a national program designed to make the characteristics of the CSN carbon method match the IMPROVE carbon method more closely.

2.9 Class I Area Network and IMPROVE Program

Visibility monitoring networks track impairment in specified national parks and wilderness areas. These parks and wilderness areas are called Class I Wilderness Areas and were designated based on an evaluation required by Congress in the 1977 federal CAA Amendments. The evaluation, which was performed by the United States Forest Service (USFS) and National Park Service (NPS), reviewed the areas of parks and national forests which were designated as wilderness before 1977, were more than 6,000 acres, and have visual air quality as an important resource for visitors. Of the 156 Class I Areas

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 10designated across the nation, 12 are located in Arizona. Nine sites are located in USFS areas and three in NPS areas. EPA initiated the nationally-operated IMPROVE m onitoring network in 1987 whose purpose is to characterize broad regional trends and visibility conditions using monitoring data collected in or near Class I Wilderness Areas across the Unite d States. ADEQ is involved with the operation of 6 sites with IMPROVE instrumentation. Refer to section 4.12 and Appendix B for additional details regarding ADEQ’s Class I Visibility and IMPROVE networks.

2.10 AIRNow Reporting

ADEQ currently utilizes three urban nephelometers to approximate and report PM 2.5 data to the AIRNow Web site to provide near real-time data for public use in the Phoenix metropolitan area. The PM 2.5 value is calculated by applying a correlation developed between the nephelometer and filter-based measurements. The program is voluntary and was originally intended to fill gaps in the AIRNow network until actual continuous methods were available. Several years ago, ADEQ attempted to submit additional continuous data to AIRNow via XML format; however, despite assurances that this format would be acceptable, AIRNow was not able to process data in this format. ADEQ has recently renewed these efforts to provide data to the AIRNow system and is currently working with their contractor to modify the existing AIRNow data transfer modul e. ADEQ hopes to utilize AIRNow’s new AQCSV file format to transfer data to AIRNow.

2.11 Urban Haze Network

Historically, ADEQ operated an urban haze network in the Phoenix and Tucson metropolitan areas. The purpose of the networks is to provide policy-makers and the public with information regarding urban haze levels, track short-term and long-term urban haze trends, assess source contributions to urban haze, and better evaluate the effectiveness of air pollution control strategies on urban haze. Equipment used to evaluate urban visibility includes transmissometers, nephelometers, particulate monitors, and digital camera systems. A wealth of urban visibility related data and information have been collected for more than a decade in both the Phoenix and Tucson area. Recently, due to budget cuts, this non-mandatory program was reduced to operate in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area only. This network includes the digital cameras and the nephelometers and transmissometer that support the AIRNow data reporting. Additional details regarding ADEQ’s Urban Haze Network can be found in section 4.13.

2.12 E-BAM Network of PM 10 Special Purpose Monitors

The current network of E-BAM continuous particulat e special purpose monitors (listed in Table 2.12-1) is composed of lightweight, portable monitors typi cally enclosed in self-contained, environmentally sealed containers. They can be battery or solar pow ered for operation at sites without fixed electrical power. E-BAMs continuously sample and report particulate concentrations. Data are sampled every second and concentrations recorded every minute. E-BAM monitors have been used by many agencies, particularly in the western United Sates, to provide continuous, real-time particulate concentration data that are useful for making informed smoke management decisions related to prescribed burns. E-BAM instruments are used for special purpose monitoring only. They are not classified as FRMs or FEMs and may not be used to demonstrate NAAQS compliance. ADEQ uses these monitors for temporary or short term monitoring of populated areas that could be impacted by smoke from controlled burns or for investigations of complaint responses. Historicall y, ADEQ’s E-BAM monitors have been configured to

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 11m easure particles ≤ 10 microns in diameter (PM 10 ). To get a better understanding of smoke impacts in these smaller communities, ADEQ is considering changing the configuration on these monitors to measure only particles ≤ 2.5 microns in diameter (PM 2.5 ). Hourly data from the E-BAM monitors can be viewed at: http://www.phoenixvis.net/PPMmain.aspx

.

Table 2.12-1 Location of E-BAM Monitors Site Name Address Flagstaff Middle School 755 N. Bonito, Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Prescott College AQD 336 Grove Ave., Prescott, AZ 86301 Sedona Post Office 190 W. Highway 89A, Sedona, AZ 86336 Show Low 561 E. Deuce of Clubs, Show Low, AZ 85901 Springerville 323 S. Mountain Ave., Springerville, AZ 85936 Verde Ranger Station 300 E. Highway 260, Camp Verde, AZ 86322



### 3.0 MONITORING NETWORK EVALUATION

This section describes changes in ADEQ's current monitoring network that have taken place since the 2010 Network Plan was issued as well as changes planned for the next 18 months.

3.1 Site Closures

Tucson Transmissometer Receiver and Transmitter sites – Both of the sites were part of the Urban Visibility Program and were closed in 2010 due to budget constraints.

Prescott College AQD – The site may be closed following the 2012 ozone season. It does not meet siting requirements because of the close proximity to tall trees and to a nearby road with a high traffic count. These conditions make the Prescott College AQD site unsuitable for continued, long-term placement of the O 3 monitor. In addition, environmental control issues (the O 3 instrument is in a room at the college that may not be temperature-controlled in summer months) have impacted the operation of the seasonal O 3 monitor. A search for a suitable site will continue in 2011. It is ADEQ’s goal to run O 3 monitors at two sites in Prescott during the 2012 O 3 season so that data from the two sites can be compared. An EBAM monitor is also located at this site. At this time, it is not known if this E-BAM monitor will be removed along with the O 3 monitor.

Bethune Elementary School – The following were considerations in deciding to close this site:
1. Current and ongoing budgetary limitations require the redirection of non-essential resources. ADEQ no longer has the resources to conduct monitoring that is not required by regulation. The Bethune Elementary School monitor is an SPM and not required by the CFR.
2. The Maricopa County Air Quality Department (MCAQD) PM 10 network provides sufficient coverage for attainment / nonattainment determinations in Maricopa County. 3. The West 43 rd , Durango, South Phoenix, Greenwood, and Cent ral Phoenix sites provide data that are representative of the Bethune Elementary School monitor.

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 12Snowflake – An E-BAM was added in 2010 for a period of one year for smoke management information. This was a temporary study which ended in May, 2011. This E-BAM monitor will be redeployed to its original location in Show Low, AZ.

3.2 New Sites

Lake Havasu City – Kingman MSA – This area (population between 50,000 and 350,000) may require an O 3 monitor to be sited to capture maximum concentration in the MSA. The location would likely be in or near Lake Havasu City. A suitable site would be selected following careful analysis of the potential sites identified by our search process and in accordance with O 3 network monitoring guidelines. While a site in the Lake Havasu area has been under consideration for the past several years, delays in the promulgation of the O 3 NAAQS and the associated monitoring rule have delayed this process.

Globe Highway – This location was selected for the Hayden area Pb monitor in accordance with monitoring guidance published by EPA. EPA Region 9 has concurred with the selection of this site. Collocated TSP monitors were installed at this site in October 2010 as part of ADEQ's Pb network. A meteorological tower along with instrumentation to measure wind, temperature, and relative humidity were also installed in Spring, 2011.

Miami Golf Course – This location was selected for the Miami area Pb monitor in accordance with monitoring guidance published by EPA. A Pb TSP monitor was installed at this site in October 2010. A meteorological tower along with instrumentation to measure wind, temperature, and relative humidity were also installed in Spring, 2011.

Replacement for Prescott College AQD – An O 3 monitor will be located at a new site in Prescott prior to the start of the 2012 O 3 season. The current site does not meet siting requirements because of the close proximity to tall trees and to a nearby road with a high traffic count. In addition, environmental control issues (the instrument is in a room at the college that may not be temperature-controlled in summer months) have impacted the operation of the seasonal O 3 monitor. A search for a suitable s will continue in 2011. It is ADEQ’s goal to run O ite O 3 3 monitors at two sites in Prescott during the 2012 season so that data from the two sites can be compared.

3.3 Instrument Changes

Tucson Urban Visibility Monitors – ADEQ discontinued the operation of all nephelometers and transmissometers in the Tucson area due to budget constraints. The affected sites include Children’s Park, 22 nd & Craycroft, and the Tucson Transmissometer Receiver and Transmitter sites. Supporting meteorological instruments were also closed at these sites. These instruments were shut down in May, 2010.

JLG Supersite CO and SO 2 – High-sensitivity instruments for measurements of CO and SO 2 are required as part of the NCore program. These ‘trace-level’ monitors were installed at JLG Supersite in the fall of 2010. These instruments were operational by January 1, 2011. The older, traditional CO SO and 11. 2 instruments that were previously used for NAAQS compliance were removed in the spring of 20 Data from these ‘trace-level’ monitors will be reported to AQS in place of the traditional monitors.

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 13State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 14 JLG Supersite PM coarse , PM 10 , and PM 2.5 BAMs – Two FEM BAM instruments and an electronic connection between them provide hourly PM 10-2.5 , PM 10 , and PM 2.5 measurements to meet NCore requirements. These instruments were installed in the fall of 2010 and were operational by January 1, 2011. Data from these instruments will be reported to AQS.

JLG Supersite PM 10 , and PM 2.5 TEOMs – The PM 2.5 FDMS TEOM and the PM 10 TEOM instruments will be removed following a period of collocation with the paired BAMs system. Simultaneous TEOM and BAM monitoring is warranted for a period of time to assess the comparability between the two instrument types. After sufficient data are collected, the PM 2.5 FDMS TEOM and PM 10 TEOM will be removed.

JLG Supersite PM 2.5 – The collocated Partisol 2025 PM 2.5 instruments will be replaced by a Partisol 2000 PM 2.5 . With this change, all PM 2.5 filter-based instruments in ADEQ's network will be of the same measurement method, eliminating the need for PM 2.5 collocation at JLG Supersite since the network collocation requirement is already met. This change is scheduled to occur by July 1, 2011.

JLG Supersite Pb – Recent revisions to the Pb monitoring rule required Pb monitoring at NCore sites that are located within a combined statistical area (CBSA) with a population greater than 500,000. The Phoenix CBSA meets this population requirement, ther efore, Pb monitoring will be required at ADEQ’s NCore site (JLG Supersite). Currently, a PM 10 low volume sampler produces Pb results as part of the NATTS program. ADEQ is currently reviewing the EPA approved methods for both TSP and PM 10 collection and analysis methods. ADEQ will continue to review these methods as they become available and determine if Pb-PM 10 will be an option at JLG Supersite. ADEQ will also determine if an ‘attainment’ designation is preferred over an ‘unclassifiable’ designation, since the Pb-PM 10 data collection method cannot be used to show attainment.

O 3 Analyzers – Prior to the 2011 O 3 season, all O 3 sites were upgraded with newer API Teledyne analyzers, which have remote zero and span capabilities. These API Teledyne O 3 analyzers replaced the TEI 49C analyzers that had been used in prior years.

Queen Valley Meteorology – During the five-year network assessment, it was discovered that the Queen Valley site was not meeting PAMS monitoring requirements as it lacked meteorological measurements of wind, temperature, and relative humidity. Meteorological instrumentation was installed at this site in the Spring, 2011.

Hayden Old Jail Meteorology – Pursuant to the recommendation in ADEQ’s five-year network assessment to increase coverage in ADEQ’s meteorological network, meteorological measurements of wind, temperature, and relative humidity were added to this site in December, 2010.3.4 Summary of Network ChangesTable 3.4-1 Instruments Closed or to be Closed in 2011-2012Site NameAQS IDClassificationScaleMonitorObjectiveParameter(s)MeasuredReportto AQSReason for Monitor ClosureJLG Supersite04-013-9997SLAMS/NCoreNeighborhoodPopulationSO2, COYesReplaced by NCore trace-level instrumentsJLG Supersite04-013-9997SLAMS/NCoreNeighborhoodPopulationPM10, PM2.5YesPM2.5FDMS TEOM and PM10TEOM replacedby NCore BAMS monitorsJLG Supersite04-013-9997SLAMS/NCoreNeighborhoodPopulationPM2.5YesPartisol 2025 replaced by Partisol 2000Prescott College AQD04-025-8033SLAMSNeighborhoodPopulationO3YesSite does not meet EPA siting requirementsBethune Elementary School04-013-8006SPMNeighborhoodPopulationPM10YesBudget constraints, not required, redundant withother Phoenix monitorsSnowflakeSPMPM10NoPlanned one-year EBAM project endedOzone AnalyzersVariousSLAMSVariousVariousO3YesThermo 49Cs replaced with API TeledynesTucson Transmissometer /ReceiverUrban HazeUrbanVisibilityBextNo22ndSt./Craycroft04-019-1011Urban HazeUrbanVisibilityBscat, Temp, RHNoChildren’s Park04-019-1028Urban HazeUrbanVisibilityBscat, Temp, RHNoTucson urban visibility and associatedmeteorology were discontinued due tobudgetary constraintsTable 3.4-2 Instruments to be Added in 2011-2012Site/City NameAQS IDClassificationScaleObjectiveParameter(s)MeasuredReportto AQSReason for Monitor AdditionJLG Supersite04-013-9997SLAMS/NCoreNeighborhoodPopulationTrace SO2, COYesReplaced older, less accurate instrumentsJLG Supersite04-013-9997SLAMS/NCoreNeighborhoodPopulationPM2.5YesPartisol 2000 PM2.5replaces collocated Partisol2025 instrumentsJLG Supersite04-013-9997SLAMS/NCoreNeighborhoodPopulationPMcoarse, PM10, PM2.5YesPM10and PM2.5BAM instruments added tomonitor PMcoarse, PM10, and PM2.5JLG Supersite04-013-9997SLAMS/NCoreNeighborhoodPopulationPbYesNew Pb NAAQS / NCore requirementGlobe HighwaySLAMSMiddleSourcePb, Wind, TEMP, RHYesRequired source-oriented Pb monitoringMiami Golf Course04-007-8000SLAMSMiddleSourcePb, Wind, TEMP, RHYesRequired source-oriented Pb monitoringPrescott MSASLAMSUrban orNeighborhoodPopulationO3YesReplacement for Prescott College AQDLake Havasu City-KingmanMSASLAMSUrban orNeighborhoodPopulationO3YesTo be added if required by new O3rulesHayden Old Jail04-007-1001SLAMSNeighborhoodPopulationWind, TEMP, RHYesExpanding meteorology networkQueen Valley04-021-1001SLAMSNeighborhoodPopulationWind, TEMP, RHYesRequired for PAMS siteOzone AnalyzersVariousSLAMSVariousVariousO3YesAPI Teledynes replaces older Thermo 49CState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 15State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 16 

### 4.0 ADEQ MONITORING NETWORKS

Minimum monitoring requirements for the number of sites in SLAMS networks (including PAMS and NCore) are described in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D and are based on the population of urban areas. As EPA reviews the NAAQS for each of the criteria pollutants, additional network monitoring requirements for these standards as well as for the other criteria pollutants may be added. The additional requirements may be based on population or on some other metric, such as non-urban areas, micropolitan areas, or simply at the discretion of the EPA Regional Administration to adequately assess air quality for sensitive population groups. Table 4.0-1 lists Arizona's MSA populations.

Table 4.0-1 Arizona MSAs as of the July 2009 Census Estimate MSA Name Area included Population

Flagstaff Coconino County 129,849 Lake Havasu City – Kingman Mohave County 194,825 Phoenix – Mesa – Scottsdale Maricopa & Pinal Counties 4,364,094 Prescott Yavapai County 215,503 Tucson Pima County 1,020,200 Yuma Yuma County 196,972

4.1 PM 2.5 Monitoring Network Requirements

The number of PM 2.5 samplers required in urban areas is based on population (see Table 4.1-1) and design values for PM 2.5 concentrations (see Table 4.1-2).

Table 4.1-1 Minimum Number of PM 2.5 Monitors Required (40 CFR 58 Appendix D) Population (MSA) Most recent 3 yr design value ≥ 85% of any PM 2.5 NAAQS * Most recent 3 yr design value <85% any PM 2.5 NAAQS *
>1,000,000 3 2
500,000 – 1,000,000 2 1

50,000 – 500,000 1 0 * 85% of Annual NAAQS (15 μ g/m3) = 12.75 μ g/m 3 ; 85% of 24-Hour NAAQS (35
μ g/m 3 ) = 29.75 μ g/m 3

The frequency of sample collection is based on the type of sampler and the design value calculated from data collected at each FRM (filter monitors) or FEM (continuous) sampler (see Table 4.1-2). 40 CFR Part 58.12 (d)(1) gives the manual PM 2.5 sample collection frequency requirement at required SLAMS stations as every third day at sites without a collocated continuously operating PM 2.5 monitor. For SLAMS PM 2.5 sites with manual and continuous PM 2.5 monitors, the agency may request approval from the EPA Regional Administrator for a reduction to ev ery sixth day and/or seasonal sampling schedule. Sites with design values ±10 percent of 35μg/m 3 (31.5 to 38.5μg/m 3 ) and sites where 24-hour values exceed the NAAQS for three consecutive years need an every third day frequency. Sites within ±5% of 35μg/m 3 (33.25 to 36.75μg/m 3 ) need to operate on a daily schedule.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 17 Table 4.1-2 PM 2.5 Design Values and Sampling Frequencies at ADEQ SLAMS Sites

Site Name 2008-2010 24-Hour Design Value ( μ g/m 3 ) 2008-2010 Annual Design Value ( μ g/m 3 ) Current Sample Frequency Required Frequency Douglas Red Cross 14 7.1 1 in 6 1 in 3 Flagstaff Middle School* 13 6.1 1 in 6 1 in 3 JLG Supersite 19 8.1 1 in 3 1 in 3 Nogales Post Office 32 12.2 1 in 6 1 in 3 Prescott Valley* 11 5.0 1 in 6 1 in 3 Yuma Supersite* 14 7.4 1 in 6 1 in 3 * Indicates design value calculations do not meet completeness criteria

ADEQ operates EPA approved FRM samplers at all required PM 2.5 monitoring sites. Although the required frequency for all PM 2.5 FRM monitors is every third day, ADEQ operates only the monitor at JLG Supersite at this frequency. Sampling frequencies at the other sites have remained on the original every sixth day schedule established when the PM 2.5 program was started. Consideration of travel time, shipping costs, laboratory processing workload, and little change in annual values through time have discouraged changing to the more frequent mon itoring schedule. Currently, ADEQ operates continuous samplers at two monitoring sites, JLG Supersite and Nogales Post Office. A continuous PM 2.5 sampler is required at JLG Supersite as part of the NCore requirements. The continuous PM 2.5 sampler at Nogales Post Office is not an FEM, but is used to supplement the filter-based monitoring at the site that diurnal patterns in PM so

nted. 2.5 can be assessed. Since the PM 2.5 design value at Nogales Post Office is within 10 percent of the NAAQS, higher frequency monitoring is warra

4.1.1 Compliance with 40 CFR Part 58.10 (c)

A process for relocating violating PM 2.5 monitors is described in 40 CFR Part 58.10 (c). It requires the annual monitoring network plan to document how state and local agencies provide for the review of changes to a PM 2.5 monitoring network that impact the location of a violating PM 2.5 monitor or the creation/change to a community monitoring zone, including a description of the proposed use of spatial averaging for purposes of making comparisons to the annual PM 2.5 NAAQS as set forth in Appendix N to Part 50. The affected agency must document the process for obtaining public comment and include any comments received through the public notification process within their submitted plan.

ADEQ does not intend to establish community monitoring zones as described in the rule or utilize spatial averaging for comparison to the PM 2.5 NAAQS. A public comment procedure is required prior to relocation of a violating monitor and ADEQ will utilize the following procedure: 1. Evaluation of the potential replacement site will include review and comparison of available pollutant data, meteorology, climatology, terrain, and siting characteristics. This information will be documented in a brief report. 2. Make notice of such a change in the annual monitoring network plan. 3. If the change must be accomplished prior to annual monitoring network plan submittal, ADEQ will make appropriate notice via the agency Web page and invite participation from the public prior to relocation of the affected site. 4. Relocation of the monitor.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 18 4.2 PM 10 Monitoring Network Requirements

The number of PM 10 samplers required in urban areas is based on population (see Table 4.2-1) and design values for PM 10 24-hour concentrations (see Table 4.2-2). ADEQ has delegated authority for monitoring PM 10 to Maricopa, Pinal, and Pima Counties, giving them responsibility for the monitoring network for the MSAs within their counties. ADEQ's PM 10 monitoring network includes the MSAs in all other Arizona counties, as well as the PM 10 non-attainment areas in those counties. ADEQ operates a PM coarse monitor (difference method using BAM instruments) in the Phoenix metropolitan area at the JLG Supersite NCore site. PM 10 concentrations are available from the PM 10 BAM instrument to support the multipollutant measurements at that site.

Table 4.2-1 Minimum Number of PM 10 Monitors Required (40 CFR 58 Appendix D)

Population (MSA) High Concentration Exceeds 24-Hour NAAQS by 20% or more (>180μg/m 3 ) Medium Concentration Exceeds 80% of 24- Hour NAAQS

(>120μg/m 3 ) Low Concentration Less than 80% of 24-Hour NAAQS (<120 μg/m 3 )
>1,000,000 6-10 4-8 2-4 500,000 – 1,000,000 4-8 2-4 1-2

250,000 – 500,000 3-4 1-2 0-1 100,000 – 250,000 1-2 0-1 0

The monitoring rule in 40 CFR Part 58.12 (e) states that for PM 10 sites, “...the minimum monitoring schedule for the site in the area of expected maximum concentration shall be based on the relative level of that monitoring site concentration with respect to the 24-hour standard.” In rural areas of Arizona where there is only one PM 10 monitor to represent the area, such as Ajo, Hayden, and Yuma, sites can be considered de facto maximum-concentration sites whose operating frequencies must be determined using the Ratio-to-Standard diagram in 40 CFR Part 58.12 (e). Due to the variability in PM 10 concentrations from year to year throughout Arizona, the operating frequencies of ADEQ PM 10 monitors will be evaluated every five years as part of the Five Year Network Assessment. Table 4.2-2 provides the design values and sampling frequencies for ADEQ’s PM 10 monitors. Since exceptional events have a large impact on PM 10 design values in Arizona, two scenarios are provided.

In recent years, ADEQ has transitioned several PM 10 monitors from filter-based methods to continuous methods. As stated in ADEQ’s Five Year Networ k Assessment, this transition to continuous PM 10 samplers continues to be a focus for ADEQ, but there are no plans at this time to transition additional filter-based monitors to continuous samplers. ADEQ will be removing the Bethune Elementary School PM 10 SPM at the end of the second quarter of 2011. This monitor is not required by regulation and ADEQ does not have the resources to operate non-essential monitors. A further description of the rationale for removing this monitor can be found in Appendix F.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 19 Table 4.2-2 PM 10 NAAQS Design Value and Sampling Frequencies of ADEQ PM 10 Monitors

Site Name Estimated Days PM 10 >150

( μ g/m 3 ) 2008-2010 Including

Events Estimated Days PM 10 >150

( μ g/m 3 ) 2008-2010 Excluding

Events Current Sample Frequency Historical Sample Frequency

Ajo 2 0 0 Continuous 1 in 6 Bullhead City 0 0 1 in 6 1 in 6 Douglas Red Cross 1 0 0 1 in 6 1 in 6 Flagstaff Middle School 0 0 1 in 6 1 in 6 Hayden Old Jail 2 0.3 0 Continuous 1 in 6 Bethune Elementary School (SPM) 2 0 1 in 6 1 in 6

JLG Supersite 0 0 Continuous 1 in 6 and Continuous Nogales Post Office 2.2 0 1 in 6 and Continuous 1 in 6 and Continuous Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant 2 0 1 in 6 1 in 6 Payson Well Site 0 0 1 in 6 1 in 6 Prescott Valley 1 0 0 1 in 6 1 in 6 Rillito 2 0.7 0 Continuous 1 in 6 Yuma Supersite 3 3.6 0 Continuous 1 in 6 and Continuous

1 Indicates design value calculations do not meet completeness criteria
2 Filter-based and continuous records merged to calculate design value
3 Continuous records from Yuma Courthouse and Yuma Supersite merged to calculate design value

4.3 O 3 Monitoring Network Requirements

The current EPA minimum monitoring requirements for O 3 are shown below in Table 4.3-1. EPA has proposed revisions to the O 3 monitoring requirements, but these revisions have not been finalized. If the proposed revisions go final, there will be an affect on ADEQ’s O 3 network. Potential effects include:

 greater coordination with the NPS as their monitors may be used to meet the rural O 3 monitoring requirement

 an additional O 3 monitor may be needed in the Lake Havasu area to meet the population requirement

 an additional O 3 monitor may be needed in a micropolitan statistical area to meet a new population requirement.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 20 plans. ADEQ is basing its current O 3 monitoring network off of the current regulations in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D. ADEQ is aware of the potential for changes to the O 3 monitoring rule. If EPA does finalize their proposed rule, ADEQ will address these changes in subsequent network

Table 4.3-1 Minimum Number of O 3 Monitors Required (40 CFR 58 Appendix D)

Population (MSA) Most recent 3 year 8- hour Design Value ≥ 85% of NAAQS (0.075 ppm) or no Design

Value available Most recent 3 year 8- hour Design Value <85% NAAQS (0.075 ppm)

>10 Million 4 2 4-10 Million 3 1 350,000 - 4 Million 2 1

50,000 – 350,000 1 0

ADEQ operates a network of seven O 3 monitors throughout Arizona (see Table 4.3-2). Authority to operate O 3 monitors has been delegated to Maricopa, Pima, and Pinal counties. ADEQ will be relocating the Prescott College AQD monitor following the 2012 O 3 season due to siting requirements. Prior to the 2011 O 3 season, ADEQ upgraded their O 3 monitoring network by replacing the Thermo 43C analyzers with newer API Teledyne analyzers. The new API Teledyne O 3 analyzers allow for remote zero, span, and precision checks which will improve the overall efficiency of ADEQ’s ambient air monitoring
group.

Table 4.3-2 O 3 Design Values at ADEQ Sites

Site Operating Schedule 2008-2010 Design Value (ppm) Alamo Lake April - October 0.072 Flagstaff Middle School April - October 0.069 JLG Supersite January - December 0.075 Prescott College AQD * April - October 0.066 Queen Valley April - October 0.074 Tonto National Monument April - October 0.073 Yuma Supersite April - October 0.073 * Based on incomplete data (2008)

4.3.1 O 3 Season

In accordance with 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D, Paragraph 4.1(i), ADEQ was granted a modification to the January through December O 3 season defined in the regulation. Prior to the 2008 revision to the O 3 NAAQS, the 1998 EPA guidance document entitled, “Guideline for Selecting and Modifying the Ozone Monitoring Season Based on an Eight-Hour Ozone Standard” supported a shorter O 3 season for Arizona (April through October) based upon data collected from 1990-1995. During the Spring of 2011, this analysis was updated to include the 2008 O 3 NAAQS, as well as more recent data. To get the best representation of the entire state, data from all O 3 sites in Arizona were used in the analysis. For theState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 21 period 2006-2010, the average number of days above 85 percent of the 2008 NAAQS of 0.075 ppm continues to support the operation of seasonal monitors (see Figure 4.3-1). However, the data indicate that the O 3 season should be extended one month to include the month of March. In 2012 ADEQ plans to extend the O 3 season by starting to monitor O 3 in March instead of April. As shown in Table 4.3-2, the current seasonal sites are Alamo Lake, Flag staff Middle School, Prescott College AQD, Queen Valley, Tonto National Monument, and Yuma Supersite. The JLG Supersite will continue to operate on a January to December schedule.

Figure 4.3-1 Average Number of Days exceeding 85% of the 2008 O 3 NAAQS

2006-2010 Average Number of Days > 85% Ozone Standard In All Arizona Ozone Sites Combined

0 5 10 15 20 25

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecTotal Ozone Exceedances

4.4 Pb Monitoring Network Requirements

In November 2008, EPA revised the Pb NAAQS from 1.5 μ g/m 3 to 0.15 μ g/m 3 . New requirements for the placement of monitors were added: (1) near Pb sources (by January 1, 2010) having annual ambient air Pb emissions that are expected to exceed one ton and (2) in non-source urban areas (by January 1, 2011) with populations greater than 500,000. In December 2009, EPA proposed revisions to these monitoring requirements. In December, 2010, the EPA finalized the Pb monitoring requirements which required Pb monitoring near sources with Pb emissions greater than 0.5 tons. Monitors near these 0.5 to 1 ton sources are to be operational one year from the date of the final rule. Additionally, the final rule adjusted the non-source monitoring requirement to be limited to NCore sites with CBSA populations greater than 500,000. ADEQ has installed Pb monitors at the Globe Highway site as well as the Miami Golf Course site, effective October, 2010. ADEQ is currently exploring options for Pb monitoring methods at JLG Supersite and will have this monitor installed by December, 2011. ADEQ is hoping to use the current low volume PM 10 metals speciation sampler as the collection method. However, this collection method will be dependent upon EPA’s approval of analysis methods for this type of sampling. ADEQ hopes to use the same PM 10 metals speciation sample that is used for the NATTS program for the analysis of Pb. Eastern Research Group (ERG) currently analyzes these samples. The Pb monitoring final rule also clarified that Pb monitoring will not be required in the Prescott area, despite Ernest A. Love Field Airport exceeding the 0.5 ton Pb emissions threshold.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 22 as ’s

CFR Part 58 Appendix D.

y NO 2 monitors. 4.5 SO 2 Monitoring Network Requirements

ADEQ operates a network of three SO 2 monitors throughout Arizona. Authority to operate SO 2 monitors has also been delegated to Maricopa and Pima counties. ASARCO LLC and Freeport MacMoRan Copper and Gold Inc. also operate SO 2 monitoring networks in Gila County for compliance purposes to support SIP requirements. The SO 2 monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D is based on a Populated Weighted Emi ssions Index (PWEI) that is calculated for each CBSA. CBSAs with PWEIs greater than 5,000 require at least one SO 2 monitor. CBSAs with PWEIs greater than 100,000 require a minimum of two SO 2 monitors. The Phoenix and Tucson metropolitan areas are the only areas within the state of Arizona that require ambient monitoring of SO 2 . The current SO 2 monitors in place that are operated by Maricopa and Pima counties meet or exceed the current monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D. ADEQ will continue to operate at least one SO 2 monitor in the Hayden and Miami areas to support the local facility networks. ADEQ h been working with these facilities to acquire their SO 2 ambient monitoring data for reporting to EPA AQS database. In the years to come, ADEQ will continue to work with these facilities to review and report ambient SO 2 data to the AQS database where compliance with the SO 2 standard can be easily monitored. ADEQ has and will continue to perform annual performance evaluations for these facilities’ SO 2 monitors. ADEQ also operates a trace-level SO 2 monitor at its NCore site (JLG Supersite), as required in 40

4.6 NO 2 Monitoring Network Requirements

ADEQ operates one NO 2 monitor throughout the state of Arizona. This NO 2 monitor is located at the JLG Supersite. Authority to operate NO 2 monitors has also been delegated to Maricopa and Pima counties. The NO 2 monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D are based on a combination of CBSA population and Annual Aver age Daily Traffic (AADT) counts. The first requirement to be considered is the CBSA population. CBSAs with populations greater than 500,000 are required to operate one near roadway monitor, while CBSAs with populations greater than 2.5 million are required to operate two near roadway monitors. Additionally, CBSAs with populations greater than 500,000 which also contain roadway segments with 250,000 or greater AADT also require two near roadway monitors. As can be seen in table 4.0-1, two CBSAs (Phoenix and Tucson Metro areas) within the state of Arizona contain populations greater than 500,000 and therefore require at least one NO 2 near roadway monitor. The Phoenix CBSA also exceeds the 2.5 million population requirement, therefore two near roadway monitors are needed in the Phoenix CBSA. The required near roadway monitors in Tucson and Phoenix will be operated by the local monitoring agencies in their respected areas. ADEQ has reviewed population and AADT data and has determined that no other areas in the state require near roadwa

In addition to the near roadway m onitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D, there is also a requirement for area-wide NO 2 monitoring. CBSAs with populations of one million or more require one NO 2 monitor to measure NO 2 concentrations that represent neighborhood or larger spatial scales. The Phoenix and Tucson metropolitan areas are the only areas within the state of Arizona that require ambient monitoring of NO 2 . The current NO 2 monitors in place that are operated by Maricopa and Pima counties meet or exceed the current monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 23 Appendix D. ADEQ will continue to monitor NO 2 at JLG Supersite as part of the NO x measurements which are required for the PAMS program.

4.7 CO Monitoring Network Requirements

ADEQ operates one CO monitor throughout Arizona. This CO monitor is a trace level monitor that is located at the JLG Supersite to fulfill NCore monitoring requirements. Authority to operate CO monitors has also been delegated to Maricopa and Pima counties. There are no CO minimum monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D, however, continued operation of CO monitors is required until discontinuation is approved by the EPA Regional Administrator. While there are no minimum monitoring requirements for CO set for in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D, the EPA has recently proposed new monitoring requirements for CO. Except for those CO monitors that are required as part of the NCore network, the proposed monitoring requirements would not require any area-wide CO monitors. However, the proposed monitoring requirements would require near roadway CO monitors in CBSAs with populations of one million or greater . These near roadway CO monitors would be collocated with the NO 2 near roadway monitoring stations. Since the Tucson and Phoenix CBSAs both exceed the one million population requirement set forth in the proposed rule, the number of near roadway CO monitors would be identical to the number of near roadway NO 2 monitors. The required near roadway monitors in Tucson and Phoenix will be operated by the local monitoring agencies in their respected areas. The one CO monitor that is currently operated by ADEQ meets or exceeds the minimum monitoring requirements for both the NCore and CO network design criteria set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D.

4.8 PAMS Monitoring Network Requirements

Network design and monitoring requirements for PA MS stations are provided in 40 CFR 58 Appendix D for areas classified as serious, severe, or extreme nonattainment for O 3 . Two sites are required for each area, providing all chemical measurements are made. Measurements include speciated VOCs, carbonyls, NO x , trace level nitrogen oxides (NO y ), CO, O 3 , surface meteorology, and upper air meteorology. In 2008, EPA shortened the PAMS monitoring season to June through August.

ADEQ's PAMS network consists of two ambient air monitoring sites in the Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale MSA and a meteorological site for the collection of upper air meteorological data and solar radiation data.

JLG Supersite – Type 2 PAMS Site The JLG Supersite was designated a PAMS site in 1999. To meet the revised EPA requirement for daily monitoring, ADEQ contracted with an outside vendor for the operation of an automated gas chromatograph mass spectrometer (Auto GC/MS) monitoring system for collection and analysis of PAMS VOCs data at JLG Supersite for the 2007 monitoring season. The hourly data were reviewed and submitted to AQS. A comparison with the canister samples collected for Toxics VOCs indicated the Auto GC/MS measurements were within 15 percent of the canister method results. Analysis of the 2007 results has been completed. The successful operation of the Auto GC/MS and the reliability of the results for analysis plus the additional information that continuous measurements can provide could support a decision to purchase an Auto GC/MS to be operated at JLG Supersite during PAMS season inState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 24 lieu of canister sampling. However, consultation with current users of Auto GC equipment in several different agencies confirmed that purchase and installation would cost approximately $100,000 and successful operation would require half of a full tim e employee on a continuing basis. Since the required manual method of eight three-hour canisters running daily is impractical due to increased expenses for staff, shipping, and analysis, ADEQ returned to the 2006 monitoring schedule of a 24-hour canister sample every sixth day at the JLG Supersite during PAMS season for VOCs. This will be reviewed when the final results of the PAMS re-engineering program are available which may include recommendations for changes to monitoring and possibly new types of instruments. ADEQ also operates carbonyl, O 3 , CO, NOx, and surface meteorological monitoring equipment at JLG Supersite (see Table 4.8-1). Carbonyl monitoring at JLG Supersite is not currently required for PAMS and could be discontinued for the 2012 PAMS season but there are no current plans at this time.

Table 4.8-1 JLG Supersite PAMS Instrumentation

Parameter Dates of Operation Collection Method Frequency and Duration

VOC 6/1/11 – 8/31/11 Canister Sampler Every 6th day, 24 Hr Carbonyl 6/1/11 – 8/31/11 Multi-port Carbonyl Sampler Every 6th day, 24 Hr, and 3 - 3hr samples (0500-0800, 0800-1100, 1100-1400) CO 1/1/11 – 12/31/11 Trace CO Hourly average
O 3 1/1/11 – 12/31/11 O 3 Analyzer Hourly average
NOx 1/1/11 – 12/31/11 NOx Analyzer Hourly average Meteorology 1/1/11 – 12/31/11  wind speed/direction

 temperature

 relative humidity Hourly average

Queen Valley – Type 3 PAMS Site Queen Valley was designated a PAMS site in 2001. The site is located near the southeastern edge of the photochemical modeling grid domain and is considered to be downwind of the source of maximum precursor emissions in the Phoenix metropolitan area. Pollutants collected at the site include speciated PAMS VOCs, O 3 , total reactive NOx, and surface meteorology measurements. ADEQ’s Five-Year Network Assessment identified the Queen Valley site as not meeting PAMS monitoring requirements due to the lack of meteorological measurements. Meteorological instrumentation was added during the second quarter of 2011. Carbonyl samples are not required at Type 3 sites. Table 4.8-2 lists the instrumentation and monitoring schedule at the Queen Valley site.

Table 4.8-2 Queen Valley PAMS Instrumentation

Parameter Dates of Operation Collection Method Frequency and Duration

VOC 6/1/11 – 8/31/11 Multi-port sampler Every 6 th day, 24Hr, and 3 – 3hr samples (0500-0800, 1300-1600, 1600-1900) O 3 4/1/11 – 10/31/11 O 3 Analyzer Hourly averageState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 25 NOy 4/1/11 – 10/31/11 NOy Analyzer Hourly average Meteorology 4/19/11 – 12/31/11  wind speed/direction

 temperature

 relative humidity Hourly average

Vehicle Emissions Laboratory – Upper Air Meteorology Site A radar wind profiler collects continuous upper air meteorological data for determination of mixing heights. This site also includes a pyranometer to measure total solar radiation, UV solar radiation, wind speed, wind direction, temperature, and relative humidity. Barometric pressure and precipitation measurements are collected by the National Weather Service (NWS) site at nearby Sky Harbor Airport.

Table 4.8-3 Vehicle Emissions Laboratory PAMS Instrumentation Parameter Dates of Operation Method Duration Meteorology 1/1/11-12/31/11  Radar Acoustic Sounding System (RASS)

 pyranometer (total solar radiation)

 ultra-violet (UV solar)

 wind speed/direction

 temperature

 relative humidity Hourly average

4.9 NCore Monitoring Network Requirements

EPA has identified JLG Supersite as the required NCore site for the Phoenix metropolitan area. JLG Supersite has a long history of m ultipollutant monitoring since its establishment in 1993. Currently, several monitoring programs are supported at this site, (SLAMS, PAMS, NATTS, and CSN) as well as meteorology. The required NCore parameters are listed in Table 4.9-1. All required NCore monitors were operational by January 1, 2011. EPA approved ADEQ's NCore monitoring plan submitted in 2009, but did not grant the waiver request to substitute NOx m onitoring for NOy.

Table 4.9-1 JLG Supersite NCore Instrumentation Required Measurement Frequency/Duration Status PM 2.5 FRM mass 24 hour average every 3rd day Thermo Partisol is current instrument; PM 2.5 samples collected since 1999 PM 2.5 speciation - organic and elemental carbon, major ions, and trace metals 24 hour average; every 3rd day MetOne SuperSASS with URG module is current instrument; STN samples collected since 1999

Continuous PM coarse mass Hourly MetOne BAM 1020 FEM pair beginning 1/1/2011 Continuous PM 2.5 mass Hourly MetOne BAM 1020 FEM pair beginning 1/1/2011 O 3 Hourly API Teledyne 400E beginning 4/1/2011 CO Hourly Ecotech EC 9830 beginning 1/1/2011 SO 2 Hourly Ecotech EC 9850 beginning 1/1/2011 NO/NOy Hourly Ecotech EC 9843 beginning 1/1/2011 Surface meteorology Hourly RM Young anemometer, Rotronics temperature/relative humidity probe currently inState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 26 operation Pb 24 hour average; every 6th day To be determined. Currently Pb measurements are from the NATTS PM 10 metals sampler.

4.10 SIP Monitoring Network Requirements

ADEQ is responsible for preparation and subm ittal of SIPs to EPA for the non-attainment and maintenance areas in Arizona. ADEQ is also responsible for conducting ambient air monitoring for these areas with the exception of the delegated agreements with Maricopa, Pima, and Pinal counties and tribal lands. Permitted sources are also responsible for monitoring air quality, if they are the largest source of emissions for that area. Some monitoring sites are specifically named in some SIPs; other monitoring sites are not specifically named, but are representative of the air quality in that SIP area. Table 4.10-1 lists the ADEQ and source operated monitors used to determine SIP compliance.

Table 4.10-1 SIP Network Monitoring Requirements Note: Sites in italics are specifically required in SIP ; others meet the general SIP requirement that representative monitoring be conducted (no specific monitoring sites named in SIP).
Area and County Pollutant Classification ADEQ SIP Sites
Phoenix, Maricopa CO Maintenance/Attainment JLG Supersite Phoenix, Maricopa O 3 1-hr Maintenance/Attainment JLG Supersite, Tonto National Monument Phoenix-Apache Junction, Maricopa and Pinal O 3 8-hr “Basic” Nonattainment Alamo Lake, JLG Supersite , Queen Valley, Tonto National Monument Ajo, Pima PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Ajo Bullhead City, Mohave PM 10 Maintenance/Attainment Bullhead City (Post Office) Douglas, Cochise PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Douglas Red Cross ADEQ also operates one PM 10 site at the Agua Prieta Fire Station in Mexico. Paul Spur, Cochise PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Hayden, Gila and Pinal PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Hayden Old Jail

Miami, Gila PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Freeport McMoRan sites: Golf Course & Miami Ridgeline Nogales, Santa Cruz PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Nogales Post Office ADEQ also operates one PM 10 site at Nogales Fire Station in Mexico. Payson, Gila PM 10 Maintenance/Attainment Payson Well Site Phoenix, Maricopa, and Pinal (Apache Junction portion) Phoenix (Salt River Area) PM 10 Serious Nonattainment JLG Supersite

Rillito, Pima PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Rillito Both ADEQ and the source, APCC, operate instruments at this site. Yuma, Yuma PM 10 Moderate Nonattainme nt Yuma Supersite ADEQ also operates one PM 10 site in San Luis Rio Colorado, Mexico. Nogales, Santa Cruz PM 2.5 Nonattainment Nogales Post Office Ajo, Pima SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment No network or commitmentState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 27 Area and County Pollutant Classification ADEQ SIP Sites
Douglas, Cochise SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment No network or commitment Hayden, Gila and Pinal SO 2 Nonattainment – Primary ADEQ (SO 2 , MET): Hayden Old Jail ASARCO (5 SO 2 , 3 MET [no met at Jail or Garfield]): Globe Hwy, Garfield Ave., Montgomery Ranch, Hayden Old Jail, Hayden Junction Miami, Gila SO 2 Nonattainment – Primary ADEQ: Miami Ridgeline Freeport McMoRan (SO 2 , MET) Jones Ranch, Miami Townsite Morenci, Greenlee SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment No network or commitment San Manuel, Pima and Pinal SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment No network or commitment Regional Haze, 12 Class I

areas Visibility Impairing pollutants (VOC, NOx, SO 2 , PM 10 , PM 2.5 , PM 2.5 species) Statewide – IMPROVE monitors ADEQ Protocol sites: Douglas Red Cross, Organ Pipe Natl Monument, JLG Supersite, Queen Valley, Saguaro West Natl Monument, Meadview

NPS / USFS sites: Chiricahua Entrance Station, Greer Water Treatment Plant, Grand Canyon - Indian Gardens, Grand Canyon - Hance Camp, Ike’s Backbone, Meadview, Petrified Forest National Park, Pleasant Valley Ranger Sta tion, Saguaro National Park-East, Sycamore Canyon, Tonto National Monument

4.11 Source Compliance Monitoring Network Requirements

Historically, ADEQ has required several of the m ajor point sources in the state to conduct ambient monitoring for selected pollutants in and around specific facilities. Some requirements are for prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) monitoring prior to operation of the facility. Other monitoring requirements are for the duration of the permit. ADEQ activities have been limited to regular performance audits of some equipment at these sites and review of ambient data submitted according to permit requirements. Recently, ADEQ has begun to submit a portion of these data to the EPA AQS database to support SIP compliance. Sources are required to review their data and submit quality assurance documents to ADEQ with the data. Table 4.11-1 lists the monitors operated by ADEQ permitted sources. ADEQ staff are currently working with ASARCO and Freeport McMoRan staff to acquire and report SO 2 data from Miami and Hayden to the EPA AQS database.

Table 4.11-1 Source Compliance Monitoring Network
Site Name City Pollutant(s) AQS Submittal

Rillito Rillito PM 10 , Meteorology No Globe Highway Winkelman SO 2 Yes, begin w/ 2008 data ASARCO – Hayden – Garfield Ave. Hayden SO 2 Yes, begin w/ 2008 data ASARCO – Montgomery Ranch Hayden SO 2 Yes, begin w/ 2008 data ASARCO – Hayden Junction Hayden Junction SO 2 No Hayden Old Jail Hayden SO 2 NoState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 28 Site Name City Pollutant(s) AQS Submittal
Chemical Lime Plant Nelson Meteorology No

Drake Cement Sycamore Canyon PM 10 , PM 2.5 mass and ammonium speciation, Meteorology No

Miami Ridgeline Miami PM 10 mass and metals speciation Yes

Miami Golf Course Miami PM 10 mass and metals speciation, collocated Yes FMMI – Miami – Jones Ranch Miami SO 2 Yes, begin w/ 2008 data FMMI – Miami – Townsite Miami SO 2 Yes, begin w/ 2008 data

PCC – Clarkdale NW Clarkdale PM 10 mass and metals speciation, Meteorology No

PCC – Clarkdale SE Clarkdale PM 10 mass and metals speciation, Meteorology No

Carlota Mine – Sanctuary Globe PM 10 , H 2 SO 4 , Meteorology No

TEP – Springerville – Coyote Hills Springerville NO 2 , PM 10 , SO 2 , Meteorology No TEP – Springerville – Coal Yard Springerville PM 10 No

4.12 Class I Visibility Network

Visibility m onitoring networks track impairment in specified national parks and wilderness areas. These parks and wilderness areas are called Class I Areas and were designated based on an evaluation required by Congress in the 1977 federal CAA Amendments. The evaluation which was performed by the USFS and NPS reviewed the wilderness areas of parks and national forests which were designated as wilderness before 1977, were more than 6,000 acres in size, and have visual air quality as an important resource for visitors. Of the 156 Class I Areas designated across the nation, 12 are located in Arizona.

For the Class I Area designations, EPA initiated a nationally-operated monitoring network in 1987 called the I nteragency M onitoring of PRO tected V isual E nvironments (IMPROVE) program. The purpose of the network is to characterize broad regional trends and visibility conditions using monitoring data collected in or near Class I Areas across the United States. Originally, the nationalState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 29 IMPROVE network was made up of approximately 30 sites at Class I areas. During 1999-2000 the number of sites increased to approximately 110. ADEQ, Pima and Pinal counties, and federal land managers at Arizona's Class I areas cooperatively operate the visibility monitoring network in Arizona. The current network is described in Table 4.12-1. In addition to the Class I IMPROVE monitors listed in Table 4.12-1, ADEQ also operates one IMPROVE monitor at the Douglas Red Cross site, and collocated monitors at the JLG Supersite. These sites serve as urban IMPROVE monitors. The Douglas Red Cross site also serves as a border region IMPROVE site. See Appendix B for a spatial representation of the IMPROVE monitoring network and Class I areas within the state of Arizona.

Table 4.12-1 2010-2011 Arizona Class I Visibility Monitoring Network Geographic Area Represented Monitoring Location Background Meadview, Organ Pipe National Monument Chiricahua National Monument, Chiricahua Wilderness Area and Galiuro USFS Wilderness Chiricahua Entrance Station

Grand Canyon National Park Hance Camp and Indian Gardens Mazatzal and Pine Mountain USFS Wilderness Ike’s Backbone Mount Baldy Greer Water Treatment Plant Petrified Forest National Park Petrified Forest Saguaro National Park East Unit and West Unit Sierra Ancha USFS Wilderness Pleasant Valley Ranger Station Superstition USFS Wilderness Tonto National Monument, Queen Valley Sycamore Canyon USFS Wilderness Sycamore Canyon (Camp Raymond)

ADEQ's 1996 monitoring plan for the Arizona Class I areas proposed adding optical and meteorological monitoring equipment to existing IMPROVE sites to supplement data collected by the IMPROVE aerosol monitors with continuous measurements to better characterize the air quality in these areas. ADEQ’s 2002 Class I Area Visibility monitoring plan propos ed to established protocol sites (completely supported by ADEQ following IMPROVE monitoring requirements) to supplement the IMPROVE network coverage. Part of the motivation for installing integrating nephelometers at IMPROVE sites was a desire to use short term (five minutes) visibility estimates to model the visual experience of a visitor to a Class I area. A second motivation for installing nephelometers at IMPROVE sites was to provide input to mathematical algorithms that create values that can be compared with the IMPROVE measurements to test the performance of the IMPROVE algorithm. Both the original and the revised IMPROVE algorithms tend to over-estimate the lowest extinction values typical of the Arizona IMPROVE sites.

Due to budget constraints, ADEQ shut down the Class I nephelometer network in 2010. Over a decade of data were collected at several of these nephelometer sites. In early 2011, a draft summary report was written which summarizes the nephelometer data that were collected since 1997. The report provides comparisons of calculated visibility impairment between the IMPROVE aerosol monitors and collocated nephelometers. Summaries and trends in visibility data are also presented within the report, as well as meteorological data summaries in the form of wind roses. This report is meant to serve as a final data summary for the Class I Nephelometer network. Information from this report may be utilized in the future if further modifications are needed to the Arizona Class I visibility network.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 30 4.13 Urban Haze Monitoring Network

Historically, ADEQ m onitored the Phoenix and Tucson metropolitan areas with a network of instruments to characterize and quantify the extent of urban haze. There are no established federal or state standards for acceptable levels of urban haze. ADEQ began studying the nature and causes of urban hazes by conducting studies during the winter of 1989-90 in Phoenix and during the winter of 1992-93 in Tucson. These studies recommended long-term, year-round monitoring of visibility. In 1993, ADEQ began deploying visibility monitoring equipment in Phoenix and Tucson. These visibility monitoring data are needed to provide policymakers and the public with information, track short and long-term trends, assess source contributions to urban haze, and better evaluate the effectiveness of air pollution control strategies. Equipment currently used to evaluate urban visibility includes transmissometers, nephelometers, particulate monitors, and digital camera systems.

The Phoenix urban haze network consists of a transmissometer for measuring light extinction along a fixed path length of four and a half kilometers, th ree nephelometers for measuring light scattering, five digital camera systems to record visual characteristics of the urban area, and particulate filters for quantifying and characterizing particulate matter. Due to budget constraints, the Tucson urban haze network was shut down in September, 2010. Approximately a decade of urban haze data were collected in the Tucson area. In early 2011, a draft summary report was written which summarizes the nephelometer and transmissometer data that were collected since 1997. The report provides summaries and trends in urban visibility data, as well as meteorological data summaries in the form of wind roses. This report is meant to serve as a final data summary for the Tucson Urban Haze network. Information from this report may be utilized in the future if further modifications are needed to the Urban Haze Network. The urban haze sites (and their status) are described in Table 4.13-1.

Table 4.13-1 Urban Haze Monitoring Network Site Name Parameter(s) Measured Phoenix Network - Operational ADEQ Building High Resolution Digital Camera Banner Mesa Medical Center High Resolution Digital Camera Dysart Light Scattering (Bscat) Nephelometer Estrella Light Scattering (Bscat) Nephelometer Estrella Mountain Community College 2 High Resolution Digital Cameras JLG Supersite IMPROVE North Mountain Summit High Resolution Digital Cameras Phoenix Transmissometer (Phoenix Baptist Hospital to Holiday Inn Hotel) Transmissometer (Bext)

Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Light Scattering (Bscat) Nephelometer Tucson Network – Closed September, 2010 22nd St./Craycroft Light Scattering (Bscat) Nephelometer Children's Park Light Scattering (Bscat) Nephelometer Tucson Transmissometer (U of A Clinical Science Building to Pima County Health & Welfare Building) Transmissometer (Bext)State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 31 4.14 Meteorology Monitoring Network

ADEQ operates m eteorological equipment at selected sites throughout its network (Table 4.14-1). Some sites were originally established because other meteorology networks (NWS, AZMet, etc.) were not located near ADEQ's ambient air quality sites. As recommended in ADEQ’s Five-Year Network Assessment, ADEQ has begun to expand the meteorology monitoring network. ADEQ has recently added meteorological instrumentation at the following sites:

 Hayden Old Jail

 Queen Valley

 Globe Highway

 Miami Golf Course

As resources and funding permits, ADEQ may add a dditional meteorological equipment at existing SLAMS sites. At this time, ADEQ plans to only s ubmit meteorological data that are required by 40 CFR Part 58.16 to EPA’s AQS database. If future resour ces allow additional meteorological data submittals to the AQS database, ADEQ may do so on a voluntary basis. A spatial representation of ADEQ’s meteorological monitoring network can be found in Appendix B.

Table 4.14-1 Meteorology Monitoring Networks

Site Temp. Temp. Lapse Rate System Relative Humidity Wind Total Horizontal Solar Radiation Ultraviolet Solar Radiation Wind Profiler Report to AQS Comments

Ajo X No Globe Highway X X X No Hayden Old Jail X X X No

JLG Supersite X X X Yes For NCore / PAMS support Miami Golf Course X X X No Nogales Post Office X No Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant - South X No

Payson Well Site X X X No
Queen Valley X X X Yes For PAMS support Rillito X X X No Vehicle Emissions X X X X X X X Solar only For PAMS supportState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 32 Site Temp. Temp. Lapse Rate System Relative Humidity Wind Total Horizontal Solar Radiation Ultraviolet Solar Radiation Wind Profiler Report to AQS Comments

Laboratory

Yuma Supersite X X X No



### 5.0 MONITORING PLAN QUALITY ASSURANCE

EPA specifies the quality assurance requirements for SLAMS, SPMs, and PSD air monitoring programs in 40 CFR 58 Appendix A. Data quality objectives, measurement quality objective and indicators, quality control (QC) checks for the monitors, calculations for data quality assessments, and data reporting requirements are part of the Air Assessment Section's (AAS) quality management system.

5.1 The Quality System

All environm ental data operations (EDOs) contain some level of uncertainty, or error, associated with them. The total measure of uncertainty is the sum of measurement error, which occurs in the data collection process, and population uncertainty, which relates to the representativeness of samples. ADEQ follows EPA’s quality system approach which uses data quality objectives (DQOs) which are developed prior to sampling in a program’s or pr oject’s planning phase. DQOs specify the amount of tolerable error that is not to be exceeded in order to make decisions using the air assessment data collected for each program’s or project’s specific purpose. To help meet DQOs, measurement quality objectives (MQOs), or performance constraints applied to air monitoring instruments, are used to keep measurement uncertainty within acceptable limits. Population uncertainty is controlled by proper site selection.

ADEQ serves as the Primary Quality Assurance Organization (PQAO) for the air monitoring stations it owns and operates. Being a PQAO streamlines Quality Assurance (QA) efforts by allowing meaningful measurement assessments to take place in a shorter period of time, by allowing expensive assessments such as collocated precision sampling and EPA-required performance evaluation (PE) audits such as the Performance Evaluation Program (PEP) and the National Performance Audit Program (NPAP) to take place at less sites and for results to be aggregated at higher levels that are representative of additional ADEQ sites.

As a PQAO, ADEQ uses precision and bias data from air monitoring instruments to assess how well we are achieving our established DQOs. Precision is defined as the measure of mutual agreement among individual measurements of the same property usually under prescribed similar conditions, and it is the random component of error. Precision data are generated from collocated sites and QC checks performed by the Air Monitoring Unit (AMU). Bias is the systematic or persistent distortion of a measurement process which causes error in one direction. It is determined by estimating the positive and negative deviation from the true value as a percentage of the true value. Bias data are generated from EPA and in-house PE audits.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 33 The measurement uncertainty among all ADEQ stations monitoring for the same pollutant is expected to be reasonably homogeneous, as a result of common factors existing between those stations. Common factors typically include:

 stations being operated by a common team of field operators and according to a common set of field procedures (standard operating procedure (SOP),

 common calibration facilities and standards,

 use of a common quality assurance project plan (QAPP),

 oversight by a common quality assurance organization, and

 support by a common management, laboratory, or headquarters.

5.1.1 ADEQ Quality Assurance Staff

The QA Team is housed in the Data Management & Quality Assurance (DM&QA) Unit and is currently composed of two full-time employees specifically dedicated to QA/QC activities. The QA/QC Lead is a member of ADEQ's agency level QA team which is chaired by the agency’s QA/QC and Laboratory Services Manager. The QA/QC Lead participates in technical assistance document (TAD) development with the EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) when possible. Information concerning changes to TADs is communicated to the QA Auditor and AMU staff so that AAS is able to comment on pertinent QA changes that affect air monitoring quality, logistics, and resources. The QA Auditor manages the PE audit program. In addition, the QA Auditor frequently interacts with air monitoring representatives from the tribes and industrial sources for public outreach or compliance
purposes.
The QA Team provides oversight and guidance on air monitoring activities to help ensure EPA's QA requirements and/or best work practices are met. Th e QA Team primarily interacts with staff from the AMU and Air Filter Laboratory (AFL) both of which are within the AAS.

The QA Team has numerous responsibilities that include, but are not necessarily limited to:

 coordinating the preparation of quality documents such as Quality Assurance Program Plans (QAPrP) which are required by EPA Region 9 and/or Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPjP) and SOPs as required by EPA OAQPS for operating air monitoring equipment, sample handling, and sample processing,

 conducting Technical Systems Audits (TSAs) of ADEQ air monitoring programs and laboratory services,

 monitoring third-party laboratory performance on TSAs conducted by EPA,

 conducting PE audits on ADEQ, source, and Pi nal County Air Quality Control District (PCAQCD) monitors, and

 reviewing documents such as chain-of-custody forms, data forms, and instrument performance forms that relate to DQOs.

For detailed information on the QA Team’s activities, see the Annual Audit Report.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 34 5.1.2 ADEQ Quality Documents

ADEQ has an agency-level Quality Management Plan (QMP) that is managed by the QA/QC Manager who reports to the General Services Section in the Administrative Services Division

. In 2010, the QA/QC Laboratory Services Manager submitted an updated QMP to EPA Region 9. This version was approved by the Region 9 Quality Assurance Administrator in November 2010. The QMP d escribes the quality m anagement processes ADEQ uses to maintain a quality management system that supports
program s involving environmental data or technology . The QMP is an “Umbrella” document which details in broad term s the strategies used to carry out QA/QC in environmental data collection activities.

Per Region 9 guidance, AAS submitted a QAPrP to EPA Region 9 in November 2001, which was never approved. This document provided a broad overview of all air monitoring programs AAS operates. This document is being replaced by individual QAPrPs which provide more detail for each major air monitoring program. QAPjPs are developed for environmental data operations of limited scope and duration, such as special studies, which have known beginning and anticipated end dates. These projects may involve single or multi-pollutant monitoring, and the QAPjPs may refer to the appropriate QAPrP for the pollutant to reduce duplication of effort. In practice, a QAPrP and a QAPjP are commonly referred to as a Quality Assurance Program/Project Plan (QAPP).

In early 2010, the QA Team updated a schedule for managing new and existing QAPPs. The team’s goal is to complete two QAPPs per year in addition to accomplishing other QA tasks. In early 2011, it was determined that QAPPs for criteria pollutants need to be prioritized. The QAPP schedule was revised to reflect the highest priority QAPPs. In 2010, the QA/QC Lead along with staff from AMU began revising the National Air Toxics Trends Stations, Air Toxics Monitoring Program, & Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations QAPP which was approved by EPA Region 9 in February 2008. Completion of this QAPP was delayed due to other work priorities. In 2010, the QA Team began coordinating the development of a new QAPP for the new Pb monitoring program. This QAPP is nearing completion and expected to be submitted to EPA Region 9 for approval in mid-2011. The QA Auditor audits the new Pb samplers and ADEQ participates in EPA’s PEP audit program for these samplers.

Based on communication with EPA, it is not necessary to develop a specific QAPP for NCore. The instruments used in the NCore program will be addressed in several program specific QAPPs that include, but may not be limited to: the PM 2.5, PM 10 , Gaseous Pollutants, and Meteorological QAPPs. The QA Auditor will manage PE audits on these instruments.

AAS follows the EPA’s QAPP for the PM 2.5 STN monitoring program. In late 2009, a new URG 3000 sampler was added for the collection of elemental and organic carbon. The QA Auditor will conduct PE audits on the SuperSASS and URG 3000 four times per year (quarterly) per instrument. An SOP for the URG 3000 from EPA is currently in-use.

SOPs for ambient air quality monitors are included in QAPPs as well as at monitoring sites for technicians and operators. AAS SOPs are being re vised to follow EPA’s format provided in the Guidance for Preparing Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) EPA QA/G-6 . The QA/QC Lead began drafting a new in-house guidance procedure for SOP management and this document is still in development. The goal is to ensure each SOP contains all pertinent procedures from each Unit withinState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 35 AAS so that all procedures are transparent for staff. This change is expected to improve the usability of each SOP while streamlining review efforts.

5.2 Measurement Quality Checks – Precision and Bias Measurements

AMU QC checks and QA PE audits generate data used to assess the quality of the ambient air quality data collected by AAS. The QC checks are used to assess precision, or imprecision actually, introduced into air quality data by the monitoring system. The PE audits generate data used to assess the amount of bias introduced into air quality data by the monitor. For particulate matter monitors, collocated sampling generates precision data as well. The information glean ed from precision and bias data is important for data certification and user purposes. This QA inform ation is provided via the AMP 255 report which is generated from the EPA’s AQS database. The AMP 255 re port is included in Appendix G of this plan to demonstrate QA completeness requirements as required in 40 CFR Part 58.10.

The precision and bias data are reviewed for QA purposes by AMU and DM&QA staff to determine the quality of the ambient air data collected. Following reviews, the data are uploaded to the AQS database per 40 CFR 58 requirements for criteria pollutants. To date, the national air monitoring programs not currently accepting/requiring this precision and bias data include the NATTS and PAMS programs.

5.2.1 Particulate Monitors – PM 10
ADEQ’s current network operates both filter-based and continuous monitors for measuring PM 10
. Currently, Partisol samplers are used for filter-based measurement and both TEOMs and BAMs are used for continuous measurements. Flow rate verifications are performed once every four weeks and instrument calibrations are performed at minimum once per year or more frequently if needed by AMU staff. The QA Auditor performs PE audits on these samplers once every six months.

Section 3.3.1 of 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix A indicates that 15 percent of the filter-based PM 10 sites in a network must be collocated. The collocated monitors mu st be within four meters of each other and at least one meter apart for flow rates less than 200 liters/min. ADEQ has seven sites and according to the rule one collocated site is required. Currently ADEQ runs two collocated filter-based samplers, at Payson Well Site and Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant, which exceeds this requirement. All concentrations from the collocated samplers are reported to the AQS with parameter occurrence code (POC) 2. Collocated samples are collected every sixth day for precision measurements.

5.2.2 Particulate Monitors – PM 2.5
ADEQ’s current network operates both filter-based and continuous monitors for measuring PM 2.5
. Currently, Partisol samplers are used for filter-based measurements and TEOMs, BAMs and nephelometers are used for continuous measurements. Flow rate verifications are performed every four weeks and calibrations are performed annually or more frequently if needed by AMU. The QA Auditor performs PE audits on these monitors once every six months.

For the PM 2.5 network, each filter-based sampling method must include collocated sampling at 15 percent of the monitoring sites operated by the reporting agency. If the area has less than fourState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 36 monitoring sites at least one must have a precision measurement. ADEQ currently operates six PM 2.5 sites which results in one collocated site being required. This requirement is met with the collocation of Partisols at the Nogales Post Office site. Previously, collocated PM 2.5 sampling also occurred at the JLG Supersite; however, with the replacement of the Partisol 2025 instruments with a Partisol 2000 instrument, collocation will no longer be required at this site. Section 3.2.5.6 of 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix A requires that the collocated monitors must be within four meters of each other and at least one meter apart for flow rates less than 200 liters/min. Collocated samples are collected every sixth day to ensure an adequate number of precision measurements. All concentrations from the collocated monitors are reported as POC 2. PEP audits are conducted on PM 2.5 filter-based samplers by the EPA. The PEP audit results are also used for measuring bias and are reported to AQS by the EPA. The ADEQ network has more than five filter-based sites, which requires eight PEP audits distributed evenly over four quarters. According to this schedule, all samplers will receive a PEP audit within a six year period.

ADEQ operates two air samplers, the SuperSASS and the URG 3000, for the PM 2.5 STN as part of the CSN. Speciation filter samples are collected every third day. There is no collocation requirement for these samplers, but data generated from these samplers complement the data generated from the collocated IMPROVE samplers at JLG Supersite. Fl ow rate verifications are performed every four weeks and calibrations are performed annually or more frequently if needed. The QA Auditor audits each sampler quarterly. Beginning with 2010, all precision and bias measurements are reported to the AQS.

5.2.3 Gas Monitors – SO 2 , O 3 , CO, NO 2
One-point precision checks, along with zero and sp an checks are conducted biweekly and multipoint calibrations are performed quarterly by AMU for all gas monitors. Multi-point PE audits are performed annually by QA. Both measurements are reported to the AQS. NPAP audits are conducted by EPA annually for bias measurements. NPAP results are reported to AQS by the EPA. Beginning in July 2010, the frequency of these audits increased and are now conducted on a semi-annual basis.

All shelters for the gas monitors contain temperature probes. The shelter temperature is checked daily via the data collection system (DCS) to verify proper operating conditions for the monitors. Shelter temperatures are required to be between 20o and 30o C. Shelter temperature probes are audited once every six months by QA.

5.2.4 Air Toxics Monitors

ADEQ’s JLG Supersite in Phoenix is a designated air monitoring station for the NATTS program. AMU conducts verifications and calibrations on the samplers used to collect PM 10 metals, Polycyclic Aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and hexavalent chrome. Calibrations occur once every six months and verifications occur on a monthly or quarterly basis. QA conducts PE audits on the same samplers once every six months. The VOC sampler is currently calibrated annually by ATEC and certified annually by ERG. The carbonyl sampler is currently calibrated annually by ATEC and certified annually by either ATEC or ERG.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 37 5.2.5 Meteorological Equipment

Meteorological equipment is audited by the QA Team annually. The meteorological equipment at the designated NCore site will be audited once every six months.

5.3 Calculations and Reporting

ADEQ subm its the required AQS precision and bias report (AMP 255) to Region 9 in the annual Certification Letter per certification guidelines and CFR requirements. As stated above, all collocated particulate mater (PM) measurements are submitted quarterly to AQS as POC 2. AQS then calculates the precision statistics. The PM flow verification data and gaseous biweekly precision check data are submitted quarterly as precision records. Audit data for both PM monitors and gas monitors are also submitted quarterly.

5.4 ADEQ AQD Audit Responsibilities

The QA Team conducts PE audits of AAS monitors, PCAQCD monitors, and some source monitors whose measurements are used for determining NAAQS compliance.

5.4.1 Internal Technical System Audits

In 2010, the QA Team provided support and assistance to AMU in addressing the findings and recommendations from the Southern Regional Office (SRO) and Northern Regional Office (NRO) staff and operator TSAs. To date, the QA Auditor conducts TSAs on 12 IMPROVE samplers at 11 sites operating throughout the state annually. These TSAs are limited to evaluating site conditions and instrument performance with occasional operator inte raction. Seven of the 12 samplers are “protocol” samplers meaning they are owned and operated by ADEQ. The other five samplers are owned and operated by EPA. Currently, AAS does not receive funds for the TSAs performed on EPA IMPROVE samplers. This schedule was reviewed in 2010 and there have been no changes to the audit services provided for IMPROVE program at this time.

In late 2009, the QA/QC Lead initiated the startup of an Air Toxics Team whose members include technicians from AMU, the QA Auditor, and the data management lead. The purpose of this team was to prepare for a TSA and to update the NATTS / ATMP / PAMS QAPP and instrument SOPs. The team meets on a regular basis to address issues related to air toxics sampling.

In mid-2010, the QA/QC Lead initiated the startup of a Pb Monitoring Team whose members include staff from Special Projects, AMU, the AFL, DM&QA as well as the manager of AAS. The purpose of the team was to ensure all pertinent staff were able to work together to develop program-related SOPs and the program QAPP.

5.4.2 ADEQ Rankings in EPA Program Reports

In early 2009, the QA Team reviewed the report of EPA's PEP audit program. DM&QA staff began investigating what changes may have occurred within the PM 2.5 network to cause a shift in programState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 38 performance over the last nine years. Based on EPA’s Three-Year Quality Assurance Reports for the SLAMS PM 2.5 Ambient Air Monitoring Program covering years 1999 through 2007, ADEQ's PM 2.5 network fell from a high rating to a low rating for bias results. Three areas are under review to identify and eliminate source(s) of error occurring in the network in order to reverse this trend. The program elements under review include: the sampler and impactor combination, the AFL gravimetric weighing process, operator training, and the PEP audit and data assessment process. To date, AFL has participated in three round-robins in the Gravimetric Inter-Laboratory Comparison Study conducted by the EPA’s National Air and Radiation Environmental Labor atory (NAREL) and scored well on each. AMU is currently working on updating their training procedures for those responsible for operating filter-based PM 10 and PM 2.5 instrumentation. Further network evaluation will continue in 2011.

5.4.3 Technical Assistance Document Development

In 2010, the process of verifying flow standards used by AMU and QA underwent some review. This review was initiated by the QA/QC Lead’s involvement as a reviewer on a new flow standard TAD by OAQPS. Currently, most AMU and QA flow standa rds are certified, or verified, annually. The calibrators used by QA for criteria pollutant gases and the O 3 standard are checked twice per year. All gas and flow rate standards used by AMU and QA Team are traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) flow standard.

5.5 EPA Audit Responsibilities

EPA Headquarters and Region 9 each have responsibilities for auditing ADEQ's ambient air monitoring
program.

5.5.2 PEP and NPAP Audits

In 2011, ADEQ will continue to participate in the EPA NPAP and the PM 2.5 PEP audits. ADEQ consented to have EPA use a portion of ADEQ's grant funds to pay for these audit programs through IFC Consultants. NPAP and PEP audits are expected to occur in 2011 as in previous years. Also, PEP audits for Pb will begin in 2011 and the cost for this will be covered by EPA this year.

5.5.2 Technical System Audits

In September 2009, EPA Region 9 conducted a comprehensive TSA on ADEQ’s air monitoring program. Findings and recommendations from the TSA were reviewed by AAS staff and an official Corrective Action Plan was submitted to EPA Region 9 in February, 2011. ADEQ will continue to work with EPA Region 9 on the findings from the 2009 EPA TSA. EPA Region 9 is required to conduct TSAs on the ADEQ monitoring program every three years.

In April 2010, ADEQ underwent a TSA of the NATTS program. The TSA was conducted by RTI, a contractor for EPA. Findings and recommendations from the TSA are being addressed.

### Appendix A – Definitions and Abbreviations

AAAD Air Assessment Ambient Database AAS Air Assessment Section AADT Annual Average Daily Traffic ADEQ Arizona Department of Environmental Quality AFL Air Filter Lab AMU Air Monitoring Unit Auto GC/MS Automated Gas Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer AQS Air Quality System (EPA database) BAM Beta Attenuation Monitor Bext Total Light Extinction Bscat Light Scattering CAA Clean Air Act CBSA Combined Statistical Area CFR Code of Federal Regulations CO Carbon Monoxide CSN Chemical Speciation Network DCS Data Collection System DM&QA Data Management and Quality Assurance Unit DQO Data Quality Objective E-BAM Environmental Proof - Beta Attenuation Monitor EDO Environmental Data Operation EPA Environmental Protection Agency FEM Federal Equivalent Method FRM Federal Reference Method HAP Hazardous Air Pollutants IMPROVE Interagency Monitoring of PROtected Visual Environments MCAQD Maricopa County Air Quality Department MET Meteorological Measurements (wind, temperature, relative humidity) MQO Measurement Quality Objective MSA Metropolitan Statistical Area
μ g/m 3 Micrograms per Cubic Meter NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standard NAREL National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory NATA National Air Toxics Assessment NATTS National Air Toxics Trends Station NCore National Core multipollutant monitoring stations NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology NM National Monument NO 2 Nitrogen Dioxide NOx Nitrogen oxides measured in two ranges; 0-1 ppm and trace level 0-0.2 ppm NOy Trace Level Nitrogen Oxides NPAP National Performance Audit Program NPS National Park Service NRO Northern Regional Office
State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 39State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 40 NWS National Weather Service O 3 Ozone OAQPS Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards PAHs Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons PAMS Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Station Pb Lead PCAQCD Pinal County Air Quality Control District PDEQ Pima County Department of Environmental Quality PE Performance Evaluation PEP Performance Evaluation Program PM Particulate Matter PM 10 Particulate Matter < 10 microns PM coarse Coarse Particulate Matter 2.5 to 10 microns aerodynamic diameter PM 2.5 Particulate Matter < 2.5 microns POC Parameter Occurrence Code ppb Parts Per Billion ppm Parts Per Million PQAO Primary Quality Assurance Organization PSD Prevention of Significant Deterioration PWEI Populated Weighted Emissions Index QA Quality Assurance QAPP Quality Assurance Program and/or Project Plan QAPjP Quality Assurance Program Plan QAPrP Quality Assurance Project Plan QC Quality Control QMP Quality Management Plan RASS Radar Acoustic Sounding System SIP State Implementation Plan SLAMS State and Local Air Monitoring Stations SO 2 Sulfur Dioxide SOP Standard Operating Procedure SPM Special Purpose Monitor SRO Southern Regional Office STN Speciation Trends Network TAD Technical Assistance Document TEOM Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance TSA Technical System Audit USFS United States Forest Service VOC Volatile Organic Compound

### Appendix B – Network Maps

There are elevan maps in this section illustra ting the location of ADEQ and Source monitors:

 CO Network

 NO 2 Network

 O 3 Network

 SO 2 Network

 Pb Network

 PM 10 Network

 PM 2.5 Network

 EBAM Network

 Meteorological Network

 Urban Visibility Network

 IMPROVE Network & Class I Wilderness areas

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 41State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 42State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 43State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 44State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 45State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 46State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 47State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 48State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 49State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 50State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 51State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 52

### Appendix C – Current Monitors by Programs-Networks-Parameters

ADEQ NETWORKS AirNOW........................................................................................................................ .......................54 EBAM.......................................................................................................................... ........................55 Meteorology Temp/RH...................................................................................................................... ..................56 Wind......................................................................................................................... ......................57 Special Purpose Monitors (SPM).........................................................................................................59

NAAQS-RELATED NETWORKS National Core Multi-pollutant Monitoring Stations (NCore) ..............................................................60 Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) ..................................................................62 State & Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS) CO........................................................................................................................... .......................64 NO 2
............................................................................................................................... .................65 O 3
............................................................................................................................... ....................65 SO 2
............................................................................................................................... ..................67 Pb ........................................................................................................................... ........................68 PM 10
............................................................................................................................... ................69 PM 2.5
............................................................................................................................... ...............71 Special Purpose Monitors (SPM).........................................................................................................72

SPECIATION TRENDS NETWORK (STN) ...........................................................................................73

AIR TOXICS National Air Toxics Trends Sites (NATTS) ...................................................................................... ..74 Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program (UATMP)..............................................................................75

VISIBILITY Urban Haze Camera ....................................................................................................................... ....................76 Nephelometer................................................................................................................. ................77 Transmissometer.............................................................................................................. ..............78 Temp/RH...................................................................................................................... ..................79 Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) ..........................................80

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 53Parameter Bscat/PM2.5 Bscat/PM2.5 Bscat/PM2.5CBSAPhoenix-MesaScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleSite monitor located Dysart EstrellaVehicle EmissionsLaboratoryMonitor location at site Tower Tower TowerMonitoring objective Population Population VisibilitySpatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitor type Nephelometer Nephelometer NephelometerAnalysis methodLight Scatter withcorrelation toPM2.5Light Scatter withcorrelation toPM2.5Light Scatter withcorrelation toPM2.5Make of monitor Optec Optec OptecModel of monitor NGN 2 NGN 2 NGN 2Method code -- -- --Monitor start date 6/16/2003 2/11/2003 6/25/2003Sampling schedule Continuous Continuous ContinuousSampling duration Hourly Hourly HourlySampling season All year All year All yearIn climate controlled shelter N N NProbe height from ground 6 m 6 m 5 mDistance from closest obstruction 30 m 25 m 30 mDistance from trees -- 5 m 50 mUnrestricted airflow degrees 360° 360° 360°Monitor audit frequency Annual Annual AnnualADEQ - AirNOWState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 54CBSA Flagstaff Prescott Flagstaff Navajo None PrescottSite monitor locatedFlagstaff MiddleSchoolPrescott CollegeAQDSedona PostOffice Show Low SpringervilleVerde RangerStationMonitor location at site Rooftop Rooftop Rooftop Rooftop Rooftop Metal PlatformMonitoring objective Population Population Population Population Population PopulationSpatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitor type E-BAM E-BAM E-BAM E-BAM E-BAM E-BAMAnalysis methodBeta RayAttenuationBeta RayAttenuationBeta RayAttenuationBeta RayAttenuationBeta RayAttenuationBeta RayAttenuationMake of monitor Met One Met One Met One Met One Met One Met OneModel of monitor E-BAM E-BAM E-BAM E-BAM E-BAM E-BAMMethod code -- -- -- -- -- --Monitor start date 7/3/2007 12/5/2006 12/5/2006 5/25/2011 9/24/2008 1/1/2008Sampling schedule Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous ContinuousSampling duration Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly HourlySampling season All year All year All year All year All year All yearIn climate controlled shelterNNNNNNProbe height from ground 6 m 6 m 2 m -- 8 m 3.5 mDistance from closest obstruction 10 m -- 13 m -- -- --Distance from trees 15 m 7 m 15 m -- 30 m 30 mUnrestricted airflow degrees 300° 250° 360° -- 250° 360°Flow rate verification frequency Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly MonthlyADEQ - E-BAM - PM10State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 55CBSAPayson PaysonPhoenix-MesaScottsdale Payson PaysonPhoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Pima YumaSite monitor locatedGlobe HighwayHayden OldJail JLG SupersiteMiami GolfCoursePayson WellSite Queen Valley RillitoYumaSupersiteMonitor location at siteTowerTowerTowerTowerTowerTowerTower TowerMonitoring objectivePopulation Population Population PopulationPopulationPopulationSource PopulationSpatial scaleNeighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodNeighborhoodNeighborhoodNeighborhood NeighborhoodMonitor typeProbe Probe Probe ProbeProbeProbeProbe ProbeAnalysis methodNone None None NoneNoneNoneNone NoneMake of monitorRotronics Rotronics Rotronics RotronicsVaisalaRotronicsVaisala VaisalaModel of monitorMP101AMP101AMP101AMP101AHMP 45CMP101AHMP 45C HMP 45CMethod code -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Monitor start date4/14/2011 2/2/2011 1/15/20106/8/2011 6/19/20034/27/20113/30/2010 3/17/2010Sampling scheduleContinuous Continuous Continuous ContinuousContinuousContinuousContinuous ContinuousSampling durationHourlyHourlyHourlyHourlyHourlyHourlyHourly HourlySampling seasonAll yearAll yearAll yearAll yearAll yearAll yearAll year All yearIn climate controlled shelterNNNNNNN NProbe height from ground2 m 2 m 2 m 2 m 3 m 2 m 2 m 2 mProbe distance from structure1 m 1 m1 m1 m1 m1 m1 m 1 mDistance from closest obstruction-- 1 m 8 m-- 7 m12 m1 m 1 mDistance from trees4 m 2 m 5 m-- 5 m--18 m--Unrestricted airflow degrees 300°250° 210°-- 250° 360° 360° 220°Monitor audit frequency Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual AnnualADEQ - Meteorology - Temp/RHState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 56CBSA TucsonPayson PaysonPhoenix-MesaScottsdale PaysonNogalesSite monitor locatedAjo Globe Highway Hayden Old Jail JLG Supersite Miami Golf CourseNogales PostOfficeMonitor location at site Tower Tower Tower Tower Tower PoleMonitoring objective Population Population Population Population Population PopulationSpatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitor type Anemometer Anemometer Anemometer Anemometer Anemometer AnemometerAnalysis method None None None None None NoneMake of monitor RM Young RM Young RM Young RM Young RM Young RM YoungModel of monitor 5103 5103 5103 5103 5103 5103Method code 40 40 40 40 40 40Monitor start date 6/11/2003 4/14/2011 2/2/2011 2/12/2003 6/8/2011 6/13/2003Sampling schedule Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous ContinuousSampling duration Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly HourlySampling season All year All year All year All year All year All yearIn climate controlled shelterNNNNNNProbe height from ground 10 m 10 m 10 m 10 m -- 10 mDistance from closest obstruction -- -- 2 m 8 m -- --Distance from trees 35 m 4 m 2 m 5 m -- 20 mUnrestricted airflow degrees 360° 360° 360° 360° -- 360°Monitor audit frequency Annual Annual Annual Biannual Annual AnnualADEQ - Meteorology - WindState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 57CBSASierra VistaDouglasPaysonPhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleTucsonPhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleYumaSite monitor locatedPaul SpurChemical LimePlant South Payson Well Site Queen Valley RillitoVehicle EmissionsLaboratory Yuma SupersiteMonitor location at site Tower Tower Tower Tower Tower TowerMonitoring objective Source Population Population Source Population PopulationSpatial scale Middle Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitor type Anemometer Anemometer Anemometer Anemometer Anemometer AnemometerAnalysis method None None None None None NoneMake of monitor RM Young RM Young RM Young RM Young RM Young RM YoungModel of monitor 5103 5103 5103 5103 5103 5103Method code 40 40 40 40 40 40Monitor start date 12/16/1997 5/30/1991 4/27/2011 1/8/2004 5/11/1999 3/17/2010Sampling schedule Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous ContinuousSampling duration Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly HourlySampling season All year All year All year All year All year All yearIn climate controlled shelterNNNNNNProbe height from ground 10 m 10 m 10 m 10 m 10 m 10 mDistance from closest obstruction -- 7 m -- 20 m 30 m 50 mDistance from trees -- 5 m -- 20 m 50 m --Unrestricted airflow degrees 360° 360° 360° 360° 360° 360°Monitor audit frequency Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual AnnualADEQ - Meteorology - Wind - continuedState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 58Parameter PM10 PM2.5 Temp/RH Wind PM10 PM2.5 PM2.5 PM10 PM2.5CBSA None None None None None None Nogales None NoneSite monitor locatedAgua Prieta FireStationAgua Prieta FireStationAgua Prieta FireStationAgua Prieta FireStationSonora NogalesFire StationSonora NogalesFire StationNogales PostOfficeSan Luis RioColoradoSan Luis RioColoradoMonitor location at site Rooftop Rooftop Rooftop Rooftop Metal Platform Metal Platform Rooftop Platform PlatformMonitoring objective Population Population Population Population Population Population Population Population PopulationSpatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitor type Partisol 2000 Partisol 2000 Probe Anemometer Partisol 2000 Partisol 2000 BAM Partisol Dichot Partisol DichotAnalysis methodGravimetric Gravimetric None None Gravimetric GravimetricBeta RayAttenuation Gravimetric GravimetricMake of monitor Thermo Thermo Vaisala RM Young Thermo Thermo Met One Thermo ThermoModel of monitor 2000 F 2000 F HMP 45C 5103 2000 F 2000 F 1020 2000 D 2000 DMethod code 126 126 -- -- 126 126 731 -- --Monitor start date 4/11/2010 4/11/2010 12/18/1998 12/18/1998 4/11/2010 4/11/2010 2/2/2004 6/15/2009 6/15/2009Sampling schedule 1 in 6 1 in 6 Continuous Continuous 1 in 6 1 in 6 Continuous 1 in 6 1 in 6Sampling duration 24 hour 24 hour Hourly Hourly 24 hour 24 hour Hourly 24 hour 24 hourSampling season All year All year All year All year All year All year All year All year All yearIn climate controlled shelterNNNNNNYNNProbe height from ground 7 m 7 m 8 m 10 m 3 m 3 m 7 m 3 m 4 mProbe distance from structure -- -- -- -- 3 m 3 m -- 20m 20mDistance from closest obstruction 30 m 30 m 30 m 30 m 3 m 3 m 8 m 50 m 50 mDistance from trees 20 m 20 m 20 m 20 m -- -- 12 m 5 m 5 mUnrestricted airflow degrees 360° 360° 360° 360° 250° 250° 300° 360° 360°Monitor audit frequency Every 3 Months Every 3 Months -- -- Every 3 Months Every 3 Months Biannual Every 3 Months Every 3 MonthsFlow rate verification frequency Every 3 Months Every 3 Months -- -- Every 3 Months Every 3 Months Monthly Every 3 Months Every 3 MonthsADEQ - SPMState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 59ParameterCO NOy O3 SO2 PM10-2.5 PM2.5CBSAPhoenix-MesaScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleSite monitor locatedJLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG SupersiteMonitor location at siteShelter Shelter Shelter Shelter Shelter Metal RoofMonitoring objectivePopulation Population Population Population Population PopulationSpatial scaleNeighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitor typeCO TraceAnalyzerTrace ReactiveNOx O3 AnalyzerSO2 TraceAnalyzer BAM Partisol 2000Analysis methodGas FilterCorrelationChemiluminescence UV PhotometricPulsedFluorescence Difference Method GravimetricMake of monitorEcotech Ecotech API Teledyne Ecotech Met One R & PModel of monitorEC 9830 EC 9843 M400E EC 9850 1020 2000 FMethod code588 591 087 592 185 145Monitor start date6/1/2010 4/1/2011 3/15/2011 6/1/2010 11/10/2010 7/1/2011Sampling scheduleContinuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous 1 in 3Sampling durationHourly Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly 24 hourSampling seasonAll year All year All year All year All year All yearIn climate controlled shelterYYYYNNProbe height from ground5 m 5 m 5 m 5 m--5 mProbe distance from structure2 m 7 m 2 m 2 m----Probe materialTeflon Teflon Teflon Teflon-- --Residence time0.76 sec 13.08 sec 0.83 sec 0.51 sec-- --Distance from closest obstruction8 m 8 m 8 m 8 m8 m8 mDistance from trees5 m 5 m 5 m 5 m5 m5 mUnrestricted airflow degrees210° 210° 210° 210°210°210°Monitor audit frequencyAnnual Annual Annual Annual Biannual BiannualFlow rate verification frequency-- -- -- -- Monthly MonthlyOne-point QC check frequencyEvery 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks -- --PEP audit monitor?-- -- -- -- -- YNPAP audit monitor?-- -- Y -- -- --NCoreState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 60ParameterPM2.5 PM2.5 Speciation PM2.5 Speciation Temp/RH WindCBSAPhoenix-MesaScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleSite monitor locatedJLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG SupersiteMonitor location at siteMetal Roof Metal Roof Metal Roof Tower TowerMonitoring objectivePopulation Population Population Population PopulationSpatial scaleNeighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitor typeBAMSpeciationFRM/SASSSpeciationFRM/URG Probe AnemometerAnalysis methodBeta RayAttenuation Various Various None NoneMake of monitorMet One Met One URG Rotronics RM YoungModel of monitor1020 Super SASS 3000N MP101A 5103Method code170 811/812/813838/839/840/841/842/826 21 40Monitor start date11/10/2010 2/21/2000 10/1/2009 1/15/2010 2/12/2003Sampling scheduleContinuous 1 in 3 1 in 3 Continuous ContinuousSampling durationHourly 24 hour 24 hour Hourly HourlySampling seasonAll year All year All year All year All yearIn climate controlled shelterY N N N NProbe height from ground5 m 5 m 5 m 2 m 10 mProbe distance from structure-- -- -- -- --Probe material-- -- -- -- --Residence time-- -- -- -- --Distance from closest obstruction8 m 8 m 8 m 8 m 8 mDistance from trees5 m 5 m 5 m 5 m 5 mUnrestricted airflow degrees210° 210° 210° 210° 360°Monitor audit frequencyBiannual Quarterly Quarterly Biannual BiannualFlow rate verification frequencyMonthly Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks -- --One-point QC check frequency-- -- -- -- --PEP audit monitor?-- -- -- -- --NPAP audit monitor?-- -- -- -- --NCore continuedState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 61ParameterCO NOx O3 Carbonyl Carbonyl VOC O3CBSAPhoenix-MesaScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleSite monitor locatedJLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite Queen ValleyMonitor location at siteShelter Shelter Shelter Shelter Shelter Shelter ShelterMonitoring objectivePopulation Population Population Population Population Population TransportSpatial scaleNeighborhood Neighborhood Urban Urban Urban Urban UrbanMonitor typeCO TraceAnalyzer NOx Analyzer O3 AnalyzeryCartridgeSampleryCartridgeSamplerCanisterSampler O3 AnalyzerAnalysis methodGas FilterCorrelationChemiluminescence UV Photometric TO-11A TO-11A Lab Analysis UV PhotometricMake of monitorThermo Thermo Thermo ATEC ATEC Met One ThermoModel of monitor48C 42C 49C 8000 8000 8001 49CMethod code54 74 47 202 202 -- 47Monitor start date12/11/2002 7/1/1993 7/1/1993 5/15/1999 5/15/1999 6/1/2009 1/1/1998Sampling scheduleContinuous Continuous Continuous 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 ContinuousSampling durationHourly Hourly Hourly 24 hour 3 - 3 hour24 hourHourlySampling seasonAll Year All Year All Year All year All year June - Aug. April – Oct.In climate controlled shelterYYYYYYYProbe height from ground5 m 5 m 5 m 5 m 5 m 4.5 m 5 mProbe distance from structure-- -- -- -- -- -- --Probe materialTeflon Teflon Teflon -- -- -- TeflonResidence time0.76 sec 0.89 sec 0.83 sec -- -- -- 3.56 secDistance from closest obstruction8 m 8 m 8 m 8 m 8 m 8 m 30 mDistance from trees5 m 5 m 5 m 5 m 5 m 5 m 3 mUnrestricted airflow degrees210° 210° 210° 210° 210° 210° 360°Monitor audit frequencyAnnual Annual Annual Annual Annual -- AnnualOne-point QC check frequencyEvery 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Annual Annual Annual Every 2 weeksNPAP audit monitor?Y Y Y -- -- -- YPAMSState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 62ParameterNOy VOC Delta TempTotal HorizontalSolar RadiationUltraviolet SolarRadiation Wind ProfilerCBSAPhoenix-MesaScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleSite monitor locatedQueen Valley Queen ValleyVehicleEmissionsLaboratoryVehicleEmissionsLaboratoryVehicleEmissionsLaboratoryVehicleEmissionsLaboratoryMonitor location at siteShelter Shelter Tower Tower Tower GroundMonitoring objectiveTransport Transport Population Population Population PopulationSpatial scaleUrban Urban Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitor typeTrace ReactiveNOx - SeasonalCanisterSamplerDelta TempSystem PyranometerUltravioletSensor Wind ProfilerAnalysis methodChemiluminescence Lab Analysis None None None NoneMake of monitorThermo Met One RM Young Li-Cor Epply VaisalaModel of monitor42C TL 8001 RTD 7627 LI - 200S2 TUVR LAP-3000Method code574 -- 810 11 11 --Monitor start date5/9/2011 6/1/2010 8/20/2004 6/18/1999 8/20/2004 1/1/1998Sampling scheduleContinuous 1 in 6 Continuous Continuous Continuous ContinuousSampling durationHourly24 hourHourly Hourly Hourly HourlySampling seasonApril – Oct. June – Aug. All year All year All year All yearIn climate controlled shelterYYNNNNProbe height from ground5 m 5 m 2 m & 9 m 5 m 5 m --Probe distance from structure-- -- 1 m 0.5 m 0.5 m --Probe material-- -- -- -- -- --Residence time-- -- -- -- -- --Distance from closest obstruction30 m 30 m 30 m 30 m 35 m 5 mDistance from trees3 m 3 m 50 m 50 m 50 m 50 mUnrestricted airflow degrees360° 360° 360° 360° 360° 360°Monitor audit frequencyAnnual Every 3 Years Annual -- -- --One-point QC check frequencyEvery 2 weeks -- -- -- -- --NPAP audit monitor?-- -- -- -- -- --PAMS continuedState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 63CBSAPhoenix-MesaScottsdaleSite monitor locatedJLG SupersiteMonitor location at siteShelterMonitoring objectivePopulationSpatial scaleNeighborhoodMonitor typeCO TraceAnalyzerAnalysis methodGas FilterCorrelationMake of monitorEcotechModel of monitorEC 9830Method code588Monitor start date6/1/2010Sampling scheduleContinuousSampling durationHourlySampling seasonAll YearIn climate controlled shelterYProbe height from ground5 mProbe materialTeflonResidence time0.76 secDistance from closest obstruction8 mDistance from trees5 mUnrestricted airflow degrees210°Monitor audit frequencyAnnualOne-point QC check frequencyEvery 2 weeksNPAP audit monitor?YNAAQS - SLAMS - COState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 64CBSAPhoenix-MesaScottsdaleSite monitor locatedJLG SupersiteMonitor location at siteShelterMonitoring objectivePopulationSpatial scaleNeighborhoodMonitor typeNOx AnalyzerAnalysis methodChemiluminescenceMake of monitorThermoModel of monitor42CMethod code74Monitor start date7/1/1993Sampling scheduleContinuousSampling durationHourlySampling seasonAll YearIn climate controlled shelterYProbe height from ground5 mProbe materialTeflonResidence time0.89 secDistance from closest obstruction8 mDistance from trees5 mUnrestricted airflow degrees210°Monitor audit frequencyAnnualOne-point QC check frequencyEvery 2 weeksNPAP audit monitor?YNAAQS - SLAMS - NO2State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 65CBSA None FlagstaffPhoenix-MesaScottsdalePrescottPhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePayson YumaSite monitor locatedAlamo LakeFlagstaff MiddleSchool JLG SupersitePrescott CollegeAQD Queen ValleyTonto NationalMonument Yuma SupersiteMonitor location at site Shelter Shelter Shelter Shelter Shelter Shelter ShelterMonitoring objective Transport Population Population Population Transport Transport PopulationSpatial scale Regional Neighborhood Urban Neighborhood Urban Regional NeighborhoodMonitor type O3 Analyzer O3 Analyzer O3 Analyzer O3 Analyzer O3 Analyzer O3 Analyzer O3 AnalyzerAnalysis methodUV Photometric UV Photometric UV Photometric UV Photometric UV Photometric UV Photometric UV PhotometricMake of monitor Teledyne API Teledyne API Teledyne API Teledyne API Teledyne API Teledyne API Teledyne APIModel of monitor 400E 400E 400E 400E 400E 400E 400EMethod code 087 087 087 087 087 087 087Monitor start date 3/1/2011 3/1/2011 3/15/2011 3/1/2011 3/1/2011 3/1/2011 3/1/2011Sampling schedule Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous ContinuousSampling duration Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly HourlySampling season April – Oct. April – Oct. All Year April – Oct. April – Oct. April – Oct. April – Oct.In climate controlled shelterYYYYYYYProbe height from ground 5 m 10 m 5 m 6 m 5 m 6 m 5 mProbe distance from structure 2 m 0.5 m -- -- -- 2 m 2 mProbe material Teflon Teflon Teflon Teflon Teflon Teflon TeflonResidence time 2.91 sec 8.66 sec 0.83 sec 3.60 sec 3.56 sec 3.53 sec 2.98 secDistance from closest obstruction 7 m -- 8 m -- 30 m -- 35 mDistance from trees 12 m 15 m 5 m 12 m 3 m 4 m --Unrestricted airflow degrees 360° 360° 210° 250° 360° 360° 360°Monitor audit frequency Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual AnnualOne-point QC check frequency Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeksNPAP audit monitor? -- -- Y -- Y Y --NAAQS - SLAMS - O3State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 66CBSA PaysonPhoenix-MesaScottsdalePaysonSite monitor located Hayden Old Jail JLG Supersite Miami RidgelineMonitor location at site Shelter Shelter ShelterMonitoring objective Source Population SourceSpatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitor type SO2 AnalyzerSO2 TraceAnalyzerSO2 AnalyzerAnalysis methodPulsedFluorescencePulsedFluorescencePulsedFluorescenceMake of monitor ThermoEcotechThermoModel of monitor 43CEC 985043CMethod code 6059260Monitor start date 1/1/1975 6/11/2010 10/5/1995Sampling schedule Continuous Continuous ContinuousSampling duration Hourly Hourly HourlySampling season All year All year All yearIn climate controlled shelter Y Y YProbe height from ground 7 m 5 m 4 mProbe distance from structure 2 m -- 2 mProbe material Teflon Teflon TeflonResidence time 4.75 sec 0.51 sec 4.88 secDistance from closest obstruction 3 m 8 m 5 mDistance from trees 15 m 5 m 5 mUnrestricted airflow degrees 360° 210° 180°Monitor audit frequency Annual Annual AnnualOne-point QC check frequency Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeksNPAP audit monitor? Y Y YNAAQS - SLAMS - SO2State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 67CBSA Payson PaysonPhoenix-MesaScottsdalePaysonSite monitor locatedGlobe Highway Globe Highway JLG Supersite Miami Golf CourseMonitor location at site Platform Platform Metal Roof PlatformMonitoring objective Source Source Population SourceSpatial scale Middle Middle Neighborhood MiddleMonitor type TSP TSP -- TSPMonitor analysis method High-Vol High-Vol -- High-VolLab analysis methodInductivelyCoupled ArgonPlasma-OpticalEmissionSpectrometryInductivelyCoupled ArgonPlasma-OpticalEmissionSpectrometry--InductivelyCoupled ArgonPlasma-OpticalEmissionSpectrometryMake of monitor Tisch Tisch -- TischModel of monitor TE-5170-BL TE-5170-BL -- TE-5170-BLMethod code 191 191 -- 191Monitor start date 10/1/2010 10/1/2010 -- 10/1/2010Sampling schedule 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6Sampling duration 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hourSampling season All year All year All year All yearIn climate controlled shelterNNNNProbe height from ground 3 m 3 m -- 3.5 mProbe distance from structure -- -- -- --Distance from closest obstruction -- -- -- --Distance from trees 4 m 4 m -- 1 mUnrestricted airflow degrees360360° -- 180°Dist. between collocated monitors 2 m 2 m -- --Monitor audit frequency Quarterly Quarterly Quarterly QuarterlyFlow rate verification frequency Every 12 days Every 12 days Every 12 days Every 12 daysNAAQS - SLAMS - PbState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 68CBSA TucsonLake Havasu CityKingmanSierra Vista-DouglasFlagstaff PaysonPhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleNogalesSite monitor locatedAjo Bullhead CityDouglas RedCrossFlagstaff MiddleSchool Hayden Old Jail JLG SupersiteNogales PostOfficeMonitor location at site Metal Platform Rooftop Metal Platform Rooftop Rooftop Shelter RooftopMonitoring objective Population Population Population Population Source Population PopulationSpatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitor type TEOM Partisol 2000 Partisol 2000 Partisol 2000 TEOM BAM Partisol 2000Analysis methodTapered ElementOscillatingMicrobalanceTechnologyGravimetric Gravimetric GravimetricTapered ElementOscillatingMicrobalanceTechnologyBeta RayAttenuationGravimetricMake of monitor R & P R & P R & P R & P R & PMet OneR & PModel of monitor 1400AB 2000 F 2000 F 2000 F 1400AB10202000 FMethod code 79 126 126 126 79185126Monitor start date 2/19/2009 9/2/2003 4/1/2004 4/1/2004 3/3/20096/1/20108/27/2003Sampling schedule Continuous 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 Continuous Continuous 1 in 6Sampling duration Hourly 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour Hourly Hourly 24 hourSampling season All Year All year All year All year All year All year All yearIn climate controlled shelter YNNNNYNProbe height from ground 4 m 8 m 4 m 6 m 6 m -- 7 mProbe distance from structure -- -- -- -- -- -- --Distance from closest obstruction 7 m 7 m 10 m 10 m 3 m 8 m 8 mDistance from trees 35 m -- >10 m 15 m 15 m 5 m 6 mUnrestricted airflow degrees 360° 360° 300° 300° 360° 210° 300°Dist. between collocated monitors -- -- -- -- -- -- --Monitor audit frequency Biannual Biannual Biannual Biannual Biannual Biannual BiannualFlow rate verification frequency Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly MonthlyNAAQS - SLAMS - PM10State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 69CBSASierra VistaDouglasSierra Vista-DouglasPayson Payson Prescott Tucson YumaSite monitor locatedPaul SpurChemical LimePlantPaul SpurChemical LimePlant Payson Well Site Payson Well Site Prescott Valley Rillito Yuma SupersiteMonitor location at site Metal Platform Metal Platform Metal Platform Metal Platform Rooftop Metal PlatformShelterMonitoring objective Source Source Population Population Population SourcePopulationSpatial scale Middle Middle Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodNeighborhoodMonitor type Partisol 2000 Partisol 2000 Partisol 2000 Partisol 2000 Partisol 2000TEOM TEOMAnalysis method Gravimetric Gravimetric Gravimetric Gravimetric GravimetricTapered ElementOscillatingMicrobalanceTechnologyTapered ElementOscillatingMicrobalanceTechnologyMake of monitor R & P R & P R & P R & P R & PR & P R & PModel of monitor 2000 F 2000 F 2000 F 2000 F 2000 F1400 AB 1400 ABMethod code 126 126 126 126 12679 79Monitor start date 7/20/2005 6/28/2005 1/16/2005 5/13/2009 12/28/2007 4/1/201012/1/2009Sampling schedule 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6Continuous ContinuousSampling duration 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour Hourly HourlySampling season All year All year All year All year All year All yearAll yearIn climate controlled shelterNNNNNNYProbe height from ground 4 m 4 m 3 m 3 m 7 m 5 m5 mProbe distance from structure -- -- -- -- -- --2 mDistance from closest obstruction 50 m 50 m 12 m 12 m 20 m 4 m50 mDistance from trees 5 m 5 m 5 m 5 m -- 20 m --Unrestricted airflow degrees 320° 320° 300° 300° 360° 360° 360°Dist. between collocated monitors 1.5 m 1.5 m 2 m 2 m -- -- --Monitor audit frequency Biannual Biannual Biannual Biannual Biannual BiannualBiannualFlow rate verification frequency Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly MonthlyMonthlyNAAQS - SLAMS - PM10 continuedState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 70CBSASierra VistaDouglasFlagstaffPhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleNogales Nogales Prescott YumaSite monitor locatedDouglas RedCrossFlagstaff MiddleSchool JLG Supersite JLG SupersiteNogales PostOfficeNogales PostOffice Prescott Valley Yuma SupersiteMonitor location at site Metal Platform Rooftop Metal Roof Shelter Rooftop Rooftop Rooftop PlatformMonitoring objective Population Population Population Population Population Population Population PopulationSpatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitor type Partisol 2000 Partisol 2000 Partisol 2000 BAM Partisol 2000 Partisol 2000 Partisol 2000 Partisol 2000Analysis method Gravimetric Gravimetric GravimetricBeta RayAttenuationGravimetric Gravimetric Gravimetric GravimetricMake of monitor R & P R & P R & PMet OneR & P R & P R & P R & PModel of monitor 2000 F 2000 F 2000 F10202000 F 2000 F 2000 F 2000 FMethod code 143 143 143185143 143 143 143Monitor start date 4/1/2004 9/16/2003 7/1/20116/1/20109/26/2003 9/26/2003 1/1/2008 1/1/2010Sampling schedule 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 3 Continuous 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6Sampling duration 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour Hourly 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hourSampling season All year All year All Year All year All year All year All Year All yearIn climate controlled shelter N N N YNNNNProbe height from ground 4 m 6 m 5 m -- 7 m 7 m 7 m 5 mDistance from closest obstruction 8 m 10 m 8 m 8 m 8 m 8 m 20 m 50 mDistance from trees >10 m 15 m 5 m 5 m 10 m 10 m -- --Unrestricted airflow degrees 300° 300° 210° 210° 300° 300° 360° 360°Dist. between collocated monitors -- -- -- -- 2 m 2 m -- --Monitor audit frequency Biannual Biannual Biannual Biannual Biannual Biannual Biannual BiannualFlow rate verification frequency Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly MonthlyPEP audit monitor? Y Y Y -- Y Y -- --Changes in next 18 months? -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --NAAQS - SLAMS - PM2.5State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 71Parameter PM10CBSA NogalesSite monitor locatedNogales PostOfficeMonitor location at site RooftopMonitoring objective PopulationSpatial scale NeighborhoodMonitor type BAMAnalysis methodBeta RayAttenuationMake of monitor Met OneModel of monitor 1020Method code 122Monitor start date 2/2/2004Sampling schedule ContinuousSampling duration HourlySampling season All yearIn climate controlled shelter YProbe height from ground 7 mDistance from closest obstruction 8 mDistance from trees 12 mUnrestricted airflow degrees 300°Monitor audit frequency BiannualFlow rate verification frequency MonthlyNAAQS - SPMState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 72ParameterPM2.5 Speciated PM2.5 SpeciationCBSAPhoenix-MesaScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleSite monitor locatedJLG Supersite JLG SupersiteMonitor location at siteMetal RoofMetal RoofMonitoring objectivePopulation PopulationSpatial scaleNeighborhood NeighborhoodMonitor typeSpeciation FRM/SASSSpeciationFRM/URGAnalysis methodVarious VariousMake of monitorMet One URGModel of monitorSuper SASS 3000NMethod code811/812/813838/839/840/841/842/826Monitor start date2/21/2000 10/1/2009Sampling schedule1 in 6 1 in 3Sampling duration24 hour24 hourSampling seasonAll yearAll yearIn climate controlled shelterN NProbe height from ground5 m 5 mDistance from closest obstruction8 m 8 mDistance from trees5 m 5 mUnrestricted airflow degrees210° 210°Monitor audit frequencyBiannual QuarterlyFlow rate verification frequencyEvery 2 weeks Every 2 weeksSTNState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 73ParameterVOC VOC Carbonyl CarbonylHexavalentChromium SVOCPM10 MetalSpeciationCBSAPhoenix-MesaScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleSite monitor located JLG Supersite JLG SupersiteJLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG SupersiteMonitor location at site Shelter ShelterShelter ShelterMetal Roof Shelter Metal RoofMonitoring objective Population PopulationPopulation PopulationPopulation Population PopulationSpatial scale Urban UrbanUrban UrbanUrban Urban NeighborhoodMonitor typeVOC CanisterSamplerVOC CanisterSamplerCarbonyl CartridgeSamplerCarbonyl CartridgeSampler Toxic Air Sampler PUF Partisol 2000Analysis method TO15/TO14 TO15/TO14TO-11A TO-11ACARB Method Lab Analysis GravimetricMake of monitorTischEnvironmentalTischEnvironmental ATEC ATECXontechTischEnvironmentalR & PModel of monitor 2200 22008000 8000924 TE-1000BL 2000 FMethod code 101/126 101/126202 202921 118 126/202Monitor start date 6/6/2001 6/6/20015/15/1999 5/15/19991/1/2006 7/8/2007 1/1/2005Sampling schedule 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6Sampling duration 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hourSampling season All year All yearAll year All yearAll year All year All yearIn climate controlled shelter Y YY YNNNProbe height from ground 5 m 5 m5 m 5 m5 m 4.5 m 5 mProbe distance from structure -- ---- ---- -- --Distance from closest obstruction 8 m 8 m8 m 8 m8 m 8 m 8 mDistance from trees 5 m 5 m5 m 5 m5 m 5 m 5 mUnrestricted airflow degrees 210° 210°210° 210°210° 210° 210°Monitor audit frequency Annual AnnualAnnual AnnualBiannual Biannual BiannualFlow rate verification frequency -- ---- ---- -- MonthlyOne-point QC check frequency Annual AnnualAnnual Annual-- Monthly --TOXICS - NATTSState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 74ParameterToxicsCBSAPhoenix-MesaScottsdaleSite monitor locatedSouth PhoenixMonitor location at site ShelterMonitoring objective PopulationSpatial scale NeighborhoodMonitor typeMultiport CanisterSamplerAnalysis method TO15Make of monitor ATECModel of monitor 8001Method code --Monitor start date 8/5/2001Sampling schedule 1 in 12Sampling duration 24 hourSampling season May-Aug.In climate controlled shelter YProbe height from ground 6 mProbe distance from structure 2 mDistance from closest obstruction 12 mDistance from trees 10 mUnrestricted airflow degrees 250°Monitor audit frequency AnnualOne-point QC check frequency --TOXICS - UATMPState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 75CBSAPhoenix-MesaScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleSite monitor located ADEQ BuildingBanner MesaMedical CenterEstrella MountainCommunityCollegeEstrella MountainCommunityCollegeNorth MountainMonitor location at site Rooftop Rooftop Rooftop Rooftop TowerMonitoring objective Visibility Visibility Visibility Visibility VisibilitySpatial scale Urban Urban Urban Urban UrbanMonitor typeHigh Res DigitalCameraHigh Res DigitalCameraHigh Res DigitalCameraHigh Res DigitalCameraHigh Res DigitalCameraAnalysis method None None None None NoneMake of monitor Olympus Olympus Olympus Olympus OlympusModel of monitor SP500UZ SP500UZ SP500UZ SP500UZ SP500UZMethod code -- -- -- -- --Monitor start date 6/9/2003 6/10/2003 3/12/2003 3/12/2003 7/1/2003Sampling schedule Every 15 min. Every 15 min. Every 15 min. Every 15 min. Every 15 min.Sampling duration 1 min. 1 min. 1 min. 1 min. 1 min.Sampling season All year All year All year All year All yearIn climate controlled shelterNNNNNVisibility - Urban Haze - CameraState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 76CBSAPhoenix-MesaScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleSite monitor locatedDysart EstrellaVehicle EmissionsLaboratoryMonitor location at siteTower Tower TowerMonitoring objectivePopulation Population PopulationSpatial scaleNeighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitor typeNephelometer Nephelometer NephelometerAnalysis methodLight Scatter withcorrelation toPM2.5Light Scatter withcorrelation toPM2.5Light Scatter withcorrelation toPM2.5Make of monitorOptec Optec OptecModel of monitorNGN 2 NGN 2 NGN 2Method code-- -- --Monitor start date6/16/2003 2/11/2003 6/30/2003Sampling scheduleContinuous Continuous ContinuousSampling durationHourlyHourlyHourlySampling seasonAll yearAll yearAll yearIn climate controlled shelterNNNProbe height from ground6 m 6 m 5 mDistance from closest obstruction-- -- 30 mDistance from trees-- 5 m 50 mUnrestricted airflow degrees360° 360° 360°Monitor audit frequencyAnnualAnnualAnnualVisibility - Urban Haze - NephelometerState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 77CBSAPhoenix-MesaScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleSite monitor locatedPhoenixTransmissometerReceiverPhoenixTransmissometerTransmitterMonitor location at site Rooftop RooftopMonitoring objective Urban Haze Urban HazeSpatial scale Urban UrbanMonitor typeTransmissometerReceiverTransmissometerTransmitterAnalysis method Light Attenuation Light AttenuationMake of monitor Optec OptecModel of monitor LVP-2 LVP-2Method code -- --Monitor start date 12/1/1992 12/1/1992Sampling schedule Continuous ContinuousSampling season All year All yearIn climate controlled shelter N NVisibility - Urban Haze - TransmissometerState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 78CBSAPhoenix-MesaScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleSite monitor locatedDysart EstrellaPhoenixTransmissometerReceiverVehicle EmissionsLaboratoryMonitor location at site Tower Tower Rooftop TowerMonitoring objective Population Population Urban Haze PopulationSpatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Urban NeighborhoodMonitor type Probe Probe Probe ProbeAnalysis method NoneNoneNoneNoneMake of monitor Rotronics Rotronics Rotronics RotronicsModel of monitor MP101A MP101A MP101A MP101AMethod code -- -- -- --Monitor start date 7/16/2003 2/11/2003 6/9/2003 6/30/2003Sampling schedule Continuous Continuous Continuous ContinuousSampling duration Hourly Hourly Hourly HourlySampling season All year All year All year All yearIn climate controlled shelterNNNNProbe height from ground 6 m 6 m 36 m 5 mProbe distance from structure 1 m 1 m 1 m 1 mDistance from closest obstruction -- -- 5 m 30 mDistance from trees -- 5 m -- 50 mUnrestricted airflow degrees 360° 360° 360° 360°Monitor audit frequency Annual Annual Annual AnnualVisibility - Urban Haze - Temp/RHState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 79CBSASierra VistaDouglasSierra Vista-DouglasFlagstaff Flagstaff Apache FlagstaffPhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleLake HavasuCity-KingmanSite monitor locatedChiricahuaEntranceStationDouglas RedCrossGrand CanyonNational Park -Hance CampGrand CanyonNational Park -IndianGardensGreer WaterTreatmentPlant Ike's Backbone JLG Supersite JLG Supersite MeadviewMonitor location at site Shelter Platform Shelter Shelter Shelter Shelter Metal Roof Metal Roof ShelterMonitoring objective Visibility Visibility Visibility Visibility Visibility Visibility Population Population BackgroundSpatial scale Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Neighborhood Neighborhood RegionalMonitor type IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVEIMPROVEcollocatedIMPROVEAnalysis method Various Various Various Various Various Various Various Various VariousMake of monitor Various Various Various Various Various Various Various Various VariousModel of monitor Various Various Various Various Various Various Various Various VariousMethod code -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Monitor start date 4/2/2000 6/2/2004 8/1/1997 10/1/1989 2/29/2000 4/2/2000 4/25/2001 4/25/2001 2/1/2003Sampling schedule 1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3Sampling duration 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hourSampling season All Year All Year All year All year All year All year All year All year All yearIn climate controlled shelterNNNNNNNNNProbe height from ground 4 m 3 m * 4 m 4 m 4 m 5.5 m 5.5 m *Probe distance from structure 1 m 2 m * 2 m 1 m 1 m -- -- *Distance from closest obstruction 10 m 10 m * -- 150 m 7 m 8 m 8 m *Distance from trees 10 m 10 m * 6 m 50 m 18 m 5 m 5 m *Unrestricted airflow degrees 360° 300° * 300° 360° 360° 210° 210° *Dist. between collocated monitors -- -- -- -- -- -- 2 m 2 m --Monitor audit frequency -- Annual -- -- Annual Annual Annual Annual --Flow rate verification frequency -- -- -- -- -- -- Annual Annual --Protocol site -- Y -- -- -- -- Y Y --* Information not availableIMPROVEState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 80CBSA Tucson None PaysonPhoenix-MesaScottsdaleTucson Tucson Flagstaff PaysonSite monitor locatedOrgan PipeNationalMonumentPetrified ForestNational ParkPleasantValley RangerStation Queen ValleySaguaroNational ParkEastSaguaroNational ParkWestSycamoreCanyonTonto NationalMonumentMonitor location at site Shelter Shelter Shelter Rooftop Shelter Shelter Shelter ShelterMonitoring objective Background Visibility Visibility Visibility Visibility Visibility Visibility VisibilitySpatial scale Regional Regional Regional Urban Regional Regional Regional RegionalMonitor type IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVEAnalysis method Various Various Various Various Various Various Various VariousMake of monitor Various Various Various Various Various Various Various VariousModel of monitor Various Various Various Various Various Various Various VariousMethod code -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Monitor start date 1/14/2003 1/1/1988 2/10/2000 4/30/2001 6/4/1988 4/18/2001 9/1/1997 1/1/2002Sampling schedule 1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3Sampling duration 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hourSampling season All year All year All year All year All year All year All year All yearIn climate controlled shelterNNNNNNNYProbe height from ground 5 m * 4 m 6 m * 4 m 4 m 5 mProbe distance from structure 1.5 m * 1.5 m 1 m * 1 m 1 m 1.5 mDistance from closest obstruction 7 m * -- 30 m * -- 25 m --Distance from trees 15 m * 10 m 4 m * 15 m 15 m 6 mUnrestricted airflow degrees 360° * 360° 360° * 360° 360° 360°Dist. between collocated monitors -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Monitor audit frequency Annual -- Annual Annual -- Annual Annual AnnualFlow rate verification frequency -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Protocol site Y -- -- Y -- Y -- --* Information not availableIMPROVE - continuedState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 81

### Appendix D – Site Information Data Tables
Note: Some measurements are rounded and/or estimations

Each monitoring site where ADEQ operates ambient air instruments is desc ribed in this section. The parameters that are currently measured at the sites are listed with the start date for the parameter and not the monitor. See Appendix C fo r detailed information on specific monitors grouped by monitoring networks.

AQS ID ADEQ ID SITE NAME PAGE 21737 ADEQ Building 85 80-026-1000 16361 Agua Prieta Fire Station 86 04-019-0001 16316 Ajo 87 04-012-8000 34961 Alamo Lake 88 19489 Banner Mesa Medical Center 89 04-015-1003 16365 Bullhead City 90 04-003-8001 16679 Chiricahua Entrance Station 91 04-003-1005 16503 Douglas Red Cross 92 04-013-4010 19550 Dysart 93 04-013-8005 16506 Estrella 94 21736 Estrella Mountain Community College 95 04-005-1008 16707 Flagstaff Middle School 96 16593 Globe Highway 97 04-005-8102 16682 Grand Canyon National Park - Hance Camp 98 04-005-8101 16683 Grand Canyon National Park - Indian Garden 99 04-001-8001 16323 Greer Water Treatment Plant 100 04-007-1001 16326 Hayden Old Jail 101 04-025-8104 16421 Ike’s Backbone 102 04-013-9997 16328 JLG Supersite 103 04-015-9000 21298 Meadview 105 04-007-8000 16629 Miami Golf Course 106 04-007-0009 16382 Miami Ridgeline 107 04-023-0004 16511 Nogales Post Office 108 16480 North Mountain Summit 109 04-019-0005 16681 Organ Pipe National Monument 110 04-003-0011 16391 Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant 111 16392 Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant South 112 04-007-0008 16317 Payson Well Site 113 04-001-0012 16473 Petrified Forest National Park 114 16829 Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver 115 16330 Phoenix Transmissometer Transmitter 116 16446 Pleasant Valley Ranger Station 117 04-025-8033 133011 Prescott College AQD 118 04-025-2002 18392 Prescott Valley 119 04-021-8001 16394 Queen Valley 120 04-019-0020 16499 Rillito 121

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 82State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 83 AQS ID ADEQ ID SITE NAME PAGE 04-019-0021 16474 Saguaro National Park East 122 04-019-9000 16475 Saguaro National Park West 123 80-026-8012 113221 San Luis Rio Colorado 124 04-005-1010 16512 Sedona Post Office 125 04-017-0007 16603 Show Low 126 80-026-0005 16399 Sonora Nogales Fire Station 127 04-013-4003 16377 South Phoenix 128 135133 Springerville 129 04-005-8103 16476 Sycamore Canyon 130 04-007-0010 16447 Tonto National Monument 131 04-013-9998 16363 Vehicle Emissions Laboratory 132 138696 Verde Ranger Station 133 04-027-8011 11319 Yuma Supersite 134ADEQ Building Site Purpose : monitor urban haze.

The high-resolution digital camera sits on the northeast corner of th e building and points toward Camelback Mountain, which lies 13.4 kilome ters to the northeast. The pictures of the local view are updated every 15 minutes a nd can be viewed on the internet at http://www.phoenixvis.net/came1/index.html . The area between the site and Camelback Mountain is primarily residentia l with some commercial areas.

Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID 21737 Address 1110 W. Washington St. Phoenix, AZ 85007

County Maricopa Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.4483 Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude -112.0878

Distance to road 84 m – S Elevation 329 m Traffic count 10,852 – Washington St. Site Established Date 06/09/2003

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Visibility Network or Program Urban Haze Spatial Scale Urban Parameter start date at site 06/09/2003

Site Photos

Aerial view of ADEQ Building Camera on rooftop of ADEQ Building – 4/2010

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 84Agua Prieta Fire Station Site Purpose : special purpose monitoring.

The site is located approximately 640 meters south of the Arizona/Mexico border. The surrounding area is primarily residen tial. This site is used as a comparison to the Douglas Red Cross site as part of the border studies.

Site Information AQS ID 80-026-1000 ADEQ ID 16361 Address Calle 6 & Ave. 15 Agua Prieta, Sonora, Mexico

County Sonora Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA None Latitude 31.3283 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -109.5472

Distance to road 6 m – W Elevation 1,200 m Traffic count n/a Site Established Date 01/01/1995

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter PM 10 PM 2.5 Wind Network or Program ADE Q-SPM ADEQ-SPM ADEQ-SPM Spatial Scale Neighborho od Neighborhood Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 01/01/1995 04/11/2010 12/18/1998

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Temp/RH Network or Program ADEQ-SPM Spatial Scale Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 12/18/1998

Site Photos

Aerial view of Agua Prieta Fire Station Roof of Aqua Prieta Fire Station – 12/2004

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 85Ajo Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network.

The site is located at the Pima County Mainte nance Yard, with the wind system mounted to the north of the instruments. The closest struct ure to the site is an east-west oriented ADOT office/trailer to the south. To the east lies the st abilized tailings pile a ssociated with the Ajo mining operation which closed in 1985.

Site Information AQS ID 04-019-0001 ADEQ ID 16316 Address 1211 Well Rd. Ajo, AZ 85321

County Pima Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Tucson Latitude 32.3820 Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude -112.8575

Distance to road 109 m – E Elevation 515 m Traffic count 500 – Ajo Well Rd. 1 Site Established Date 07/01/1969

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter PM 10 Wind Network or Program SLAMS ADEQ-MET Spatial Scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 01/01/1987 07/01/1969

Site Photos

Aerial view of Ajo Ajo fenced area and meteorological tower – 03/2009

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 86Alamo Lake Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network and AQI forecasting.

The site was established to replace the Hillside si te and is located in Alamo Lake State Park, which is approximately 49,000 meters north of Wenden, AZ. The surrounding area consists of mostly desert, with a lake about 1,000 meters to the northeast. A small water pump/storage tank (1,000 gallon) lies 7 meters to the east of the instruments.

Site Information AQS ID 04-012-8000 ADEQ ID 34961 Address Alamo Lake State Park

County La Paz Groundcover Gravel

CBSA None Latitude 34.2439 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -113.5586

Distance to road 30 m – E Elevation 403 m Traffic count 230 – Alamo Rd. Site Established Date 05/20/2005

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter O 3 Network or Program SLAMS Spatial Scale Regional Parameter start date at site 05/20/2005

Site Photos

Regional view of Alamo Lake Alamo Lake shelter with water tanks to the east – 09/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 87Banner Mesa Medica l Center Site Purpose : monitor urban haze.

The high-resolution digital camera points to the Superstition Mountains, which lie 32,000 meters east of the site. The pictures of the local views are updated every 15 minutes and can be viewed on the internet at http://www.phoenixvis.net/supm1/index.html . The area between the site and the mountains is primarily residential, with some commercial areas.

Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID 19489 Address 525 W. Brown Rd. Mesa, AZ 85201

County Maricopa Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.4335 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -111.8428

Distance to road 20 m – N Elevation 454 m Traffic count 32,760 – Country Club Dr. Site Established Date 06/10/2003

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Visibility Network or Program Urban Haze Spatial Scale Urban Parameter start date at site 06/10/2003

Site Photos

Aerial view of Banner Mesa Medical Center No Photo

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 88Bullhead City Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network.

The site is located on the rooftop of the U.S. Post Office Building, northeast of SR 95 and 7 th Street. The surrounding area is commercial and residential to the west and south. The Colorado River lies to the west less than 400 meters. To the northeast/east, about 575 meters, is the Bullhead City Airport.

Site Information AQS ID 04-015-1003 ADEQ ID 16365 Address 990 Highway 95 Bullhead City, AZ 86429

County Mohave Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Lake Havasu City-Kingman Latitude 35.1539 Surrounding Area Commercial/Residential Longitude -114.5661

Distance to road ~30 m – W Elevation 156 m Traffic count 32,575 – SR 95 Site Established Date 11/01/1997

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter PM 10 Network or Program SLAMS Spatial Scale Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 11/05/1997

Site Photos

Aerial view of Bullhead City Roof of Bullhead City Post Office looking south – 09/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 89Chiricahua Entrance Station Site Purpose : monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program.

The site is operated by the NPS. The su rrounding area is wilder ness and desert. The Chiricahua National Monument lies 3,800 meters to the northeast.

Site Information AQS ID 04-003-8001 ADEQ ID 16679 Address 13063 E. Bonita Canyon Rd. Wilcox, AZ 85643

County Cochise Groundcover Dirt/Rocks

CBSA Sierra Vista-Douglas Latitude 32.0094 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -109.3891

Distance to road 99 m – E Elevation 1,570 m Traffic count 216 – Bonita Canyon Rd. Site Established Date 01/01/1988

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Aerosol Network or Program IMPROVE Spatial Scale Regional Parameter start date at site 03/02/1988

Site Photos

Regional view of Chiricahua Entrance Station Chiricahua Entrance Station shelter and IMPROVE – 07/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 90Douglas Red Cross Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network.

The site is located at the Red Cr oss building on the south side of 15 th Street. The surrounding area is a mix of residential and commercial land use. The site is about 1,685 meters from the Arizona/Mexico border. Also, there is a second AQS ID 04-003-9000 for IMPROVE data.

Site Information AQS ID 04-003-1005 ADEQ ID 16503 Address 1445 E. 15 th St. Douglas, AZ 85607

County Cochise Groundcover Dirt/Grass

CBSA Sierra Vista-Douglas Latitude 31.3492 Surrounding Area Commercial/R esidential Longitude -109.5396

Distance to road 30 m – N Elevation 1,231 m Traffic count 2,320 – 14 th St. Site Established Date 09/01/1998

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter PM 10 PM 2.5 Aerosol Network or Program SLAMS SLAMS IMPROVE Spatial Scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Regional Parameter start date at site 09/02/1998 11/02/2000 06/02/2004

Site Photos

Aerial view of Douglas Red Cross Douglas Red Cross fenced site – 07/20/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 91Dysart Site Purpose : monitor urban haze and AQI forecasting/AIRNow program.

The site is located in the Maricopa County F acility Maintenance Yard at the corner of Bell Road and Dysart Road and is shared with MCAQD. The surrounding area is commercial and residential.

Site Information AQS ID 04-013-4010 ADEQ ID 19550 Address 16825 N. Dysart Rd. Surprise, AZ 85374

County Maricopa Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.6370 Surrounding Area Commercial/R esidential Longitude -112.3393

Distance to road 14 m – W Elevation 357 m Traffic count 51,673 – Bell Rd. Site Established Date 01/01/2003

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Bscat/PM 2.5 Temp/RH Network or Program Urban Haze/ AIRNow Urban Haze Spatial Scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 01/01/2003 03/25/2003

Site Photos

Aerial view of Dysart Dysart ADEQ Nephelometer tower attached to county shelter – 02/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 92Estrella Site Purpose : monitor urban haze and AQI forecasting/AIRNow program.

The site is located in the southeast corner of the Maricopa County Maintenance Yard at Estrella Park. The surrounding area consist of the Estr ella Mountains to the east, south, and west; a golf course 256 meters to the west; and a mixture of open land, agricultural lands, residential, and commercial activity to the north.

Site Information AQS ID 04-013-8005 ADEQ ID 16506 Address 15099 W. Casey Abbott Rd. Goodyear, AZ 85338

County Maricopa Groundcover Grass/Gravel

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.3833 Surrounding Area Desert/Recreation Area Longitude -112.3728

Distance to road 258 m – N Elevation 277 m Traffic count 910 – W. Vineyard Ave. Site Established Date 01/01/1995

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Bscat/PM 2.5 Temp/RH Network or Program Urban Haze/ AIRNow Urban Haze Spatial Scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 12/18/2002 12/18/2002

Site Photos

Aerial view of Estrella Estrella Nephelometer tower – 02/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 93Estrella Mountain Community College Site Purpose : monitor urban haze.

One high-resolution digital camera points to th e Estrella Mountains, which lies 11,000 meters to the southwest, and the other camera points to the White Tanks mountain range which is 20,000 meters northeast. The pictures of the loca l views are updated every 15 minutes and can be viewed on the internet at http://www.phoenixvis.net/esmo1/index.html . The area between the site and the mountain ranges is a mixture of residential, commercial, and agricultural uses.

Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID 21736 Address 3000 N. Dysart Rd. Avondale, AZ 85323

County Maricopa Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.4836 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -112.3503

Distance to road 155 m – S Elevation 305 m Traffic count 7,280 – Thomas Rd. Site Established Date 03/12/2003

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Visibility Network or Program Urban Haze Spatial Scale Urban Parameter start date at site 03/12/2003

Site Photos

Aerial view of Estrella Mountain Community College No photo

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 94Flagstaff Middle School Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network and monitor smoke/public information.

The site is west of Bonito Road on the roof top of a Flagstaff Middle School building. The surrounding area is generally residential, with Thorpe Park located about 800 meters to the west, and US Route 180 approximately 415 meters to the east.

Site Information AQS ID 04-005-1008 ADEQ ID 16707 Address 755 N. Bonito St. Flagstaff, AZ 86001

County Coconino Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Flagstaff Latitude 35.2061 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -111.6528

Distance to road 70 m – E Elevation 2,120 m Traffic count 3,200 – N. Bonito St. Site Established Date 10/29/1996

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter O 3 PM 10 PM 2.5 Network or Program SLAMS SLAMS/ADEQE-BAM SLAMS Spatial Scale Neighborho od Neighborhood Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 03/13/2008 10/30/1996 09/09/1999

Site Photos

Aerial view of Flag staff Middle School Particulate monitors on roof of Flagstaff Middle School – 04/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 95Globe High way Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network and a source permit requirement.

This site is the location for the Pb monito ring in Hayden. ASARCO mine also maintains a sulfur dioxide analyzer at the site. This site is used to m eet the Pb collocation requirement.

Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID 16593 Address SR 77 Winkelman, AZ 85292

County Gila Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Payson Latitude 33.002 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -110.765

Distance to road 5 m – W Elevation 602 m Traffic count n/a Site Established Date 01/01/1975

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Pb Wind Temp/RH Network or Program SLAMS ADEQ-MET ADEQ-MET Spatial Scale Middle Middle Middle Parameter start date at site 10/01/2010 04/14/2011 04/14/2011

Site Photos

Aerial view of Globe Highway Shelter, towers, and TSP monitors at Globe Highway – 5/10/2011

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 96Grand Canyon National Park - Hance Camp Site Purpose : monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program.

The site is operated by the NPS. The site is 183 meters south of East Rim Drive, 1,931 meters south of Grandview Point turnoff. The si te is in a clearing surrounded by forest.

Site Information AQS ID 04-005-8102 ADEQ ID 16682 Address West of SR 64 - Grand Canyon, AZ 86023

County Coconino Groundcover Dirt

CBSA Flagstaff Latitude 35.9731 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -111.9841

Distance to road 200 m – E Elevation 2,235 m Traffic count 6,579 – SR 64 Site Established Date 09/24/1997

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Aerosol Network or Program IMPROVE Spatial Scale Regional Parameter start date at site 09/24/1997

Site Photos

Regional view of Grand Canyon NP - Hance Camp Grand Canyon NP - Hance Camp shelter – date unknown

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 97Grand Canyon National Park - In dian Gardens Site Purpose : monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program.

The site is owned by the NPS. The site is loca ted in the Indian Gardens picnic area in the Grand Canyon, near the ranger station on the sout h side of the canyon along the Bright Angel Trail.

AQS ID 04-005-8101 ADEQ ID 16683 Address Bright Angel Trail Grand Canyon, AZ 86023

County Coconino Groundcover Dirt/Rocks

CBSA Flagstaff Latitude 36.0778 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -112.1289

Distance to road 8,047 m – S Elevation 1,183 m Traffic count 1,250 – Entrance Road Site Established Date 10/01/1989

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Aerosol Network or Program IMPROVE Spatial Scale Regional Parameter start date at site 10/04/1989

Site Photos

Regional view of Grand Canyon NP - Indian Gardens Grand Canyon NP - Indian Gardens IMPROVE monitor – 04/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 98Greer Wa ter Treatment Plant Site Purpose : monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program.

The site is located in the Apache National Fo rest and is operated by ADEQ and the USFS. The surrounding area is forest with the town of Greer approximately 4,000 meters to the south/southwest.

Site Information AQS ID 04-001-8001 ADEQ ID 16323 Address SR 260 & SR 373 Greer, AZ 85927

County Apache Groundcover Grass

CBSA None Latitude 34.0583 Surrounding Area Forest Longitude -109.4400

Distance to road 1,600 m – N Elevation 2,503 m Traffic count 1,044 – SR 373 Site Established Date 01/01/2000

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Aerosol Network or Program IMPROVE Spatial Scale Regional Parameter start date at site 02/29/2000

Site Photos

Aerial view of Greer Water Treatment Plant Shelter at Greer Water Treatment Plant – 09/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 99Hayden Old Jail Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network and a source permit requirement.

The site is located in a shelter next to the ol d Hayden Jail building near the center of town. The instruments were previously located in the jail building and were moved due to safety concerns in 2010. The surrounding area consists mainly of residential and commercial. ASARCO mine also maintains a sulfur dioxide an alyzer at the site in the old ja il building.

Site Information AQS ID 04-007-1001 ADEQ ID 16326 Address Canyon Dr. & Kennecott Ave. Hayden, AZ 85235

County Gila Groundcover Shelter

CBSA Payson Latitude 33.0062 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -110.7864

Distance to road 5 m – E Elevation 625 m Traffic count 1,790 – Velasco Ave. Site Established Date 01/01/1969

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter SO 2 PM 10 Wind Network or Program SLAMS SLAMS ADEQ-MET Spatial Scale Neighborho od Neighborhood Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 01/01/1975 01/06/1986 02/02/2011

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Temp/RH Network or Program ADEQ-MET Spatial Scale Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 02/02/2011

Site Photos

Aerial view of Hayden Old Jail Hayden Old Jail – 05/2011

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 100Ike’s Backb one Site Purpose : monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program.

The site is operated by ADEQ and the USFS. The surrounding area is Tonto National Forest, which includes Mazatzal and Pine Mountain Wilderness areas with the Verde River and mountains nearby.

Site Information AQS ID 04-025-8104 ADEQ ID 16421 Address Fossil Creek Rd. and Childs Rd. Strawberry, AZ 85544

County Coconino Groundcover Rocks/Plants

CBSA Flagstaff Latitude 34.3406 Surrounding Area Forest Longitude -111.6825

Distance to road n/a Elevation 1,303 m Traffic count 475 – Fossil Creek Rd. Site Established Date 04/02/2000

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Aerosol Network or Program IMPROVE Spatial Scale Regional Parameter start date at site 04/02/2000

Site Photos

Regional view of Ike’s Backbone Shelters and tower at Ike’s Backbone – 12/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 101State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 102 JLG Supersite Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network, PAMS, NATTS, STN, NCore, AIRNow, AQI forecasting, monitor urban haze, and meteorological support.

The site was established to represent air quality in the central core of the Phoenix metropolitan area. The surrounding area is primarily reside ntial neighborhoods, with I-17 roughly 1,609
meters west.

Site Information AQS ID 04-013-9997 ADEQ ID 16328 Address 4530 N. 17 th Ave. Phoenix, AZ 85015

County Maricopa Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.5038 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -112.0957

Distance to road 8.5 m – E Elevation 354 m Traffic count 20,214 – Campbell Ave. Site Established Date 07/01/1993

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter CO CO Trace NOy Network or Program SLAMS NCore NCore Spatial Scale Neighborho od Neighborhood Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 07/01/1993 01/01/2011 01/01/2011

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter NO 2 O 3 SO 2 Network or Program SLAMS/PAMS SLAMS/PAMS/ NCore SLAMS

Spatial Scale Neighborhood Neighborhood/ Urban Neighborhood

Parameter start date at site 07/01/1993 07/01/1993 03/03/2005

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter SO 2 Trace VOC Carbonyls

Network or Program NCore TOXICS - NATTS/

PAMS TOXICS - NATTS/

PAMS Spatial Scale Neighborhood Urban Urban Parameter start date at site 01/01/2011 05/15/1999 05/15/1999

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Hexavalent Chromium SVOC Pb PM 10
Network or Program TOXIC - NATTS TOXICS - NATTS NCore Spatial Scale Urban Urban Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 01/01/2006 07/08/2007 --Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter PM 10-2.5 PM 10 PM 10 /Metal Speciation Network or Program NCore SLAMS TOXICS – NATTS Spatial Scale Neighborho od Neighborhood Neighborhood Parameter start date at site -- 07/01/1993 01/01/2005

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter PM 2.5 PM 2.5 Speciated Wind Network or Program SLAMS/NCore STN ADEQMet/NCore Spatial Scale Neighborho od Neighborhood Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 01/01/1999 01/01/1999 07/01/1993

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Temp/RH Aerosol Network or Program NCore IMPROVE Spatial Scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 01/15/2010 04/25/2001

Site Photos

Aerial view of JLG Supersite Eastern side of JLG Supersite – 09/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 103Meadview Site Purpose : monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program.

The site is located on the north end of Mea dview, AZ, which is a small town near the Nevada/Arizona border, where the Grand Canyon meets Lake Mead. The surrounding area is primarily desert. To the southw est 64,400 meters is US 93, which is the closest highway to the site and about 96,560 meters to the southeast is downtown Kingman.

Site Information AQS ID 04-015-9000 ADEQ ID 21298 Address Pierce Ferry Rd. Meadview, AZ 86444

County Mohave Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Lake Havasu City-Kingman Latitude 36.0193 Surrounding Area Desert/Residential Longitude -114.0684

Distance to road 100 m – E Elevation 902 m Traffic count 0 – Pierce Ferry Rd. Site Established Date 09/04/1991

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Aerosol Network or Program IMPROVE Spatial Scale Regional Parameter start date at site 09/04/1991

Site Photos

Regional view of Meadview Photo of Meadview taken from IMPROVE website – date unknown

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 104Miam i Golf Course Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network and a source permit requirement.

This site is the location for the Pb monitori ng in Miami. Freeport McMoRan also maintains two particulate matter monitors at the site.

Site Information AQS ID 04-007-8000 ADEQ ID 16629 Address SR 188 and US 60 Miami, AZ 85539

County Gila Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Payson Latitude 33.4190 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -110.8296

Distance to road 230 – E Elevation 1000 m Traffic count n/a Site Established Date 01/01/1997

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Pb Wind Temp/RH Network or Program SLAMS ADEQ-MET ADEQ-MET Spatial Scale Middle Middle Middle Parameter start date at site 10/01/2010 06/08/2011 06/08/2011

Site Photos

Aerial view of Miami Golf Course Fenced Miami Golf Course site – 05/2011

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 105Miam i Ridgeline Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network and a source permit requirement.

The site is located inside the fence line on pr ivate property off of Linden Road and sits on the side of a north-south oriented ri dge, which slopes in a northerly direction toward the town of Miami. The surrounding area is desert. Free port McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc. also maintains a PM 10 monitor at the site. The Freeport Mc MoRan smelter is 1,609 meters to the north of the site.

Site Information AQS ID 04-007-0009 ADEQ ID 16382 Address 4030 Linden St. Miami, AZ 85539

County Gila Groundcover Dirt

CBSA Payson Latitude 33.3992 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -110.8589

Distance to road 40 m – N Elevation 1,085 m Traffic count 510 – Loomis Ave. Site Established Date 0/01/1991

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter SO 2 Network or Program SLAMS Spatial Scale Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 10/05/1995

Site Photos

Aerial view of Miami Ridgeline Fenced Miami Ridgeline site – 04/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 106Nogales Post Office Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network.

The site is located on the rooftop of the U.S. Post Office building, which lies approximately 670 meters north from the Arizona/Mexico Bo rder. The surrounding area is a mixture of commercial and residential land use. Th is site is used to meet the PM 2.5 collocation requirement.

Site Information AQS ID 04-023-0004 ADEQ ID 16511 Address 300 N. Morley Ave. Nogales, AZ 85621

County Santa Cruz Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Nogales Latitude 31.3372 Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude -110.9367

Distance to road 14 m – NW Elevation 1,176 m Traffic count 7,199 – Morley Ave. Site Established Date 01/01/1980

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter PM 10 PM 2.5 Wind Network or Program SLAMS/NAAQSSPM SLAMS/ADEQSPM ADEQ-MET Spatial Scale Neighborho od Neighborhood Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 01/01/1980 04/01/1999 01/01/1980

Site Photos

Aerial view of Nogales Post Office Particulate monitors on roof of Nogales Post Office – 09/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 107North Mountain Summit Site Purpose : monitor urban haze.

The site is located on a mountain top in the North Mountain Recreati on Area of Phoenix. The high-resolution digital camera points toward South Mountain, which lies 27,000 meters south. The pictures of the local views are updated ever y 15 minutes and can be viewed on the internet
at http://www.phoenixvis.net/somt1/index.html . The surrounding area is desert recreation area to the north and west and residential with so me commercial activity to the south and east.

Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID 16480 Address west side of 7 th St. in North Mountain Recreation Area Phoenix, AZ

County Maricopa Groundcover Dirt/Desert

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.5855 Surrounding Area Residential/Desert Longitude -112.0722

Distance to road 850 m – E Elevation 625 m Traffic count 28,210 – 7 th St. Site Established Date 07/01/2003

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Visibility Network or Program Urban Haze Spatial Scale Urban Parameter start date at site 07/01/2003

Site Photos

Aerial view of North Mountain Summit Camera located on tower at North Mountain Summit – 2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 108Organ Pipe National Monument Site Purpose : monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program.

The site is owned by the NPS, who operates th e monitor at the site. The site is located 1,000 meters south/southwest of the national monume nt visitor center, wh ich is about 35,400 meter south of Why, AZ. The site is about 7 mete rs from a water pump house and lies about 540 meters east of a small mount ain range. The surrounding area is predominately desert.

Site Information AQS ID 04-019-0005 ADEQ ID 16681 Address SR 85 & Puerto Blanco Rd. Ajo, AZ 85321

County Pima Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Tucson Latitude 31.9499 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -112.8010

Distance to road 400 m – E Elevation 505 m Traffic count 1,525 – SR 85 Site Established Date 01/01/1971

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Aerosol Network or Program IMPROVE Spatial Scale Regional Parameter start date at site 01/15/2003

Site Photos

Regional view of Organ Pipe NM Shelter at Organ Pipe NM – 03/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 109Paul Spur Chemical L ime Plant Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network.

The site is located about 3,500 meters north of the Arizona/Mexico border and is just south of SR 80 between Bisbee and Douglas. The surroun ding area is predominately desert. The chemical lime plant is to the west/southw est. This site is used to meet the PM 10 collocation requirement.

Site Information AQS ID 04-003-0011 ADEQ ID 16391 Address SR 80 & Paul Spur Rd. Paul Spur, AZ 85603

County Cochise Groundcover Dirt

CBSA Sierra Vista-Douglas Latitude 31.3658 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -109.7309

Distance to road 50 m – S Elevation 1,278 m Traffic count 4,920 – SR 80 Site Established Date 02/21/1985

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter PM 10 Network or Program SLAMS Spatial Scale Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 03/01/1985

Site Photos

Aerial view of Paul Spur CLP Particulate monitors on pl atform at Paul Spur CLP – 07/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 110Paul Spur Chemical L ime Plant South Site Purpose : meteorological support.

The site is located about 3,500 meters north of the Arizona/Mexico border and is just south of SR 80 between Bisbee and Douglas. The surroun ding area is predominately desert. The chemical lime plant is to the north/northwest.

Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID 16392 Address South of Stonridge Rd. Paul Spur, AZ 85603

County Cochise Groundcover Dirt/Grass

CBSA Sierra Vista-Douglas Latitude 31.3543 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -109.7376

Distance to road 20 m – N Elevation 1,287 m Traffic count 4,920 – SR 80 Site Established Date 12/21/1995

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Wind Network or Program ADEQ-MET Spatial Scale Middle Parameter start date at site 12/21/1995

Site Photos

Aerial view of Paul Spur CLP South Meteorological tower at Paul Spur CLP South – 07/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 111Payson Well Site Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network.

The site is located in the southern area of Pays on, at a water well site. To the southeast of the site are two tanks. In general, the surrounding area is commercial with some residential land use. Directly to the west, on th e other side of a metal fence, is an auto repair shop and 290 meters to the east is SR 87. This site is used to meet the PM 10 collocation requirement.

Site Information AQS ID 04-007-0008 ADEQ ID 16317 Address 204 W. Aero Dr. Payson, AZ 85541

County Gila Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Payson Latitude 34.2294 Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude -111.3297

Distance to road 80 m – S Elevation 1,501 m Traffic count 1,724 – Aero Dr. Site Established Date 01/01/1991

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter PM 10 Wind Temp/RH Network or Program SLAMS ADEQ-MET ADEQ-MET Spatial Scale Neighborho od Neighborhood Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 01/01/1991 05/30/1991 05/30/1991

Site Photos

Aerial view of Payson Well Site Payson Well Site meteorological tower and particulate monitor on platform – 04/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 112Petrified Fo rest National Park Site Purpose : monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program.

The site is operated by the NPS and is locate d 1,609 meters north of park headquarters. The park sits along I-40 and the surrounding area is desert.

Site Information AQS ID 04-001-0012 ADEQ ID 16473 Address I-40 & Petrified Forest Rd. Pe trified Forest National Park, AZ

County Apache Groundcover Dirt

CBSA None Latitude 35.0770 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -109.7690

Distance to road 1,050 m – SW Elevation 1,766 m Traffic count 15,246 – I-40 Site Established Date 03/02/1988

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Aerosol Network or Program IMPROVE Spatial Scale Regional Parameter start date at site 03/02/1988

Site Photos

Regional view of Petrified Forest NP Photo of Petrified Forest NP taken from IMPROVE website – date unknown

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 113Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver Site Purpose : monitor urban haze.

The site is located in downtown Phoenix on the rooftop of the Holid ay Inn Hotel near 2 nd Avenue and Osborn Road. The transmitter is located on top of the Phoenix Baptist Hospital 4,500 meters to the northwest. The area between the two sites is a mix of residential and commercial.

Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID 16829 Address 3600 N. 2 nd Ave. Phoenix, AZ 85013

County Maricopa Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.4901 Surrounding Area Commercial/R esidential Longitude -112.0767

Distance to road 25 m – E Elevation 337 m Traffic count 1,5470 – Central Ave. Site Established Date 12/01/1992

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Bext Temp/RH Network or Program Urban Haze Urban Haze Spatial Scale Urban Urban Parameter start date at site 12/01/1992 12/01/1992

Site Photos

Aerial view of Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver on hotel rooftop – 11/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 114Phoenix Transmissometer Transmitter Site Purpose : monitor urban haze.

The transmitter is located on the rooftop of Phoenix Baptist Hospital at 19 th Avenue and Bethany Home Road. The receiver is loca ted on Holiday Inn Hotel 4,500 meters to the southeast. The area between the two sites is a mix of residential and commercial.

Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID 16330 Address 2000 W. Bethany Home Rd. Phoenix, AZ 85015

County Maricopa Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.5253 Surrounding Area Commercial/R esidential Longitude -112.1019

Distance to road 120 m – S Elevation 340 m Traffic count 40,950 – Bethany Home Rd. Site Established Date 12/01/1992

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Bext Network or Program Urban Haze Spatial Scale Urban Parameter start date at site 12/01/1992

Site Photos

Aerial view of Phoenix Transmissometer Transmitter No photo

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 115Pleasant Valley Ranger Station Site Purpose : monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program.

The site is operated by ADEQ and the USFS. Th e site is located on a hilltop south of Young, AZ. The surrounding area is wilderness and desert . The site lies 1,160 meters to the south of SR 288.

Site Information AQS ID 04-007-8100 ADEQ ID 16446 Address SR 288 & Old Cherry Rd. Young, AZ 85541

County Gila Groundcover Dirt

CBSA Payson Latitude 34.0908 Surrounding Area Desert/Forest Longitude -110.9419

Distance to road 250 m – N Elevation 1,587 m Traffic count 143 – SR 288 Site Established Date 01/01/2000

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Aerosol Network or Program IMPROVE Spatial Scale Regional Parameter start date at site 02/10/2000

Site Photos

Regional view of Pleasant Valley Ranger Station Shelter at Pleasant Valley Ranger Station – 08/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 116Prescott College AQD Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network and monitor smoke/public information.

The site is located at Prescott College on th e rooftop of the Mogoll on Building (#307). The surrounding area is residential a nd commercial, with a high tra ffic street approximately 20 meters to the east and large trees to the west.

Site Information AQS ID 04-025-8033 ADEQ ID 133011 Address 330 Grove Ave., Prescott, AZ 86301

County Yavapai Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Prescott Latitude 34.5467 Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude -112.4761

Distance to road 8 m – E Elevation 1,591 m Traffic count 21,945 – Grove Ave. Site Established Date 06/04/2007

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter O 3 PM 10 Network or Program SLAMS ADEQ-E-BAM Spatial Scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 03/25/2008 06/04/2007

Site Photos

Aerial view of Prescott College AQD E-BAM on roof of Prescott College AQD – date unknown

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 117Prescott Valley Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network.

The site is located on the Prescott Police Depa rtment building about 1,100 meters to the north of SR 69. The surrounding area is mostly resi dential with some ar eas of open desert.

Site Information AQS ID 04-025-2002 ADEQ ID 18392 Address 7601 E. Civic Cir. Prescott Valley, AZ 86314

County Yavapai Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Prescott Latitude 34.5950 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -112.3310

Distance to road 25 m – S Elevation 1,556 m Traffic count 2,400 – Civic Circle N. Site Established Date 11/08/1999

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter PM 10 PM 2.5 Network or Program SLAMS SLAMS Spatial Scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 11/08/1999 12/28/2007

Site Photos

Aerial view of Prescott Valley Particulate monitors on rooftop of Prescott Police Department – 10/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 118Queen Valley Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network, PAMS netw ork, monitor regional haze, AQI forecasting, and IMPROVE program.
The site is operated by ADEQ and PCAQCD. The site is locat ed 635 meters southeast of Queen Valley, AZ and the surroundin g area is primarily desert on the far eastern outskirts of the Phoenix metropolitan area. This is a downwind PAMS type 3 site.

Site Information AQS ID 04-021-8001 ADEQ ID 16394 Address 10 S. Queen Anne Dr. Queen Valley, AZ 85219

County Pinal Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.2938 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -111.2857

Distance to road 87 m – W Elevation 668 m Traffic count 1,284 – Queen Anne Dr. Site Established Date 04/30/2001

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter O 3 NOy VOC Network or Program SLAMS/PAMS PAMS PAMS Spatial Scale Urban Urban Urban Parameter start date at site 05/20/2001 06/24/2002 05/20/2001

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Wind Temp/RH Aerosol Network or Program ADEQ-MET ADEQ-MET IMPROVE Spatial Scale Urban Urban Urban Parameter start date at site 04/20/2011 04/20/2011 04/30/2001

Site Photos

Regional view of Queen Valley Shelter at Queen Valley site – 5/10/2011

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 119Rillito Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network and a source permit requirement.

In February of 2007 the site was moved from th e Water St. location 91 meters southwest to its current location at a city water pumping stati on. The surrounding area is primarily residential and industrial, with I-10 approximately 250 me ters to the east. Arizona Portland Cement Company also maintains PM 10 monitors at the site.

Site Information AQS ID 04-019-0020 ADEQ ID 16499 Address 8840 W. Robinson St. Rillito, AZ 85653

County Pima Groundcover Dirt

CBSA Tucson Latitude 32.4143 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -111.1545

Distance to road 7 m – S Elevation 626 m Traffic count 2,634 – I-10 Frontage Rd. Site Established Date 01/01/1974

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter PM 10 Wind Temp/RH Network or Program SLAMS ADEQ-MET ADEQ-MET Spatial Scale Neighborho od Neighborhood Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 01/01/1974 01/08/2004 3/30/2010

Site Photos

Aerial view of Rillito Rillito meteorological tower and particulate monitors on platform – 05/2010

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 120Saguaro National Park East Site Purpose : monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program.

The site is located within the Saguaro Nati onal Park East, 805 meters south of park headquarters and is operated jointly by PDEQ and NPS. The area surrounding the site is scattered residential to the west and desert to the east.

Site Information AQS ID 04-019-0021 ADEQ ID 16474 Address 3905 S. Old Spanish Trail Tucson, AZ 85730

County Pima Groundcover Dirt

CBSA Tucson Latitude 32.1740 Surrounding Area Residential/Desert Longitude -110.7360

Distance to road 82 m – W Elevation 938 m Traffic count 6,198 – Old Spanish Tail Site Established Date 06/04/1988

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Aerosol Network or Program IMPROVE Spatial Scale Regional Parameter start date at site 06/04/1988

Site Photos

Regional view of Saguaro NP East Photo of Saguaro NP East taken from IMPROVE website – date unknown

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 121Saguaro National Park West Site Purpose : monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program.

The site is located within the Saguaro National Park West. The site is operated by PDEQ and NPS and PDEQ takes care of the ADEQ monitors . The area surrounding the site is residential to the northwest and south/south east and desert to th e northeast. The site lies approximately 17 kilometers southwest of I-10.

Site Information AQS ID 04-019-9000 ADEQ ID 16475 Address N. Sandario Rd. and W. Mile Wide Rd. Tucson, AZ

County Pima Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Tucson Latitude 32.2485 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -111.2175

Distance to road 27 m – W Elevation 718 m Traffic count 1,889 – Mile Wide Rd. Site Established Date 04/19/2001

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Aerosol Network or Program IMPROVE Spatial Scale Regional Parameter start date at site 04/19/2001

Site Photos

Regional view of Saguaro NP West Shelters and towers at Saguaro NP West site – 03/2003

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 122San Luis Rio Colorado Site Purpose : special purpose monitoring.

The site is located at the Oomapas Well # 10 site at the corner of A v. Venustiano Carranza and C. 15 in San Luis Rio Colorado, Sonora, Mexico. The site is approximately 1,600 meters south of the Arizona-Mexico border. The surrounding ar ea is mixed commercial and residential use. *Note this site was previously used the in WASBAQS study.

Site Information AQS ID 80-026-8012 ADEQ ID 113221

Address Av. Venustiano Carranza and C. 15 in San Luis Rio Colorado, Sonora, Mexico County Sonora Groundcover Dirt

CBSA None Latitude 32.4664 Surrounding Area Commercial/R esidential Longitude -114.7688

Distance to road 5 m – S & E Elevation 41 m Traffic count n/a Site Established Date 07/05/2009

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter PM 10 PM 2.5 Network or Program ADEQ-SPM ADEQ-SPM Spatial Scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 07/05/2009 7/05/2009

Site Photos

Aerial view of San Luis Rio Colorado No photo

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 123Sedona Post Office Site Purpose : monitor smoke/public information.

The site is located on the U.S. Post Office bu ilding and was establishe d to assess particulate concentrations in the Sedona area. Currently the site is used for neighborhood monitoring of smoke. The surrounding area is commer cial and residential to the s outh and mainly hills to the north, east, and west. The site is located northeast of the inte rsection of SR 179 and SR 89A.

Site Information AQS ID 04-005-1010 ADEQ ID 16512 Address 190 W. Highway 89A Sedona, AZ 86336

County Coconino Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Flagstaff Latitude 34.8667 Surrounding Area Commercial/R esidential Longitude -111.765

Distance to road 45 m – S Elevation 1,279 m Traffic count 25,193 – SR 89A Site Established Date 01/01/1992

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter PM 10 Network or Program ADEQ-E-BAM Spatial Scale Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 01/01/1992

Site Photos

Aerial view of Sedona Post Office E-BAM on roof of Sedona Post Office – date unkown

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 124Sho w Low Site Purpose : monitor smoke/public information.

The site located on the Historical Museum building and was established to demonstrate NAAQS compliance. Currently the site is us ed for neighborhood monitoring of smoke. The surrounding area is residential a nd commercial. Show Low is the commercial and tourism hub of the western White Mountains and sees a se asonally increase in population by 5,000 people.

Site Information AQS ID 04-017-0007 ADEQ ID 16603 Address 561 E. Deuce of Clubs Show Low, AZ 85901

County Navajo Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA None Latitude 34.2525 Surrounding Area Commercial/R esidential Longitude -110.0364

Distance to road 36 m – NW Elevation 1,924 m Traffic count 9,500 – Deuce of Clubs Site Established Date --
Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter PM 10 Network or Program ADEQ-E-BAM Spatial Scale Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 05/25/2011

Site Photos

Aerial view of Show Low No Photo

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 125Sonora Nog ales Fire Station Site Purpose : special purpose monitoring.

The site is located on the rooft op of the Fire Station. Nogales, Sonora, Mexico is located just south, approximately 600 meters of the Arizona /Mexico border. The surrounding area is dense urban commercial and residential use.

Site Information AQS ID 80-026-0005 ADEQ ID 16399 Address Diaz and Avenue Adolfo Lop ez Mateos Nogales, Sonora, Mexico

County Sonora Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA None Latitude 31.3258 Surrounding Area Commercial/R esidential Longitude -110.9447

Distance to road 3 m – NE Elevation 1,202 m Traffic count n/a Site Established Date 11/01/1993

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter PM 10 PM 2.5 Network or Program ADEQ-SPM ADEQ-SPM Spatial Scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 11/01/1993 04/11/2010

Site Photos

Aerial view of Sonora Nogales Fire Station No photo

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 126South Phoenix Site Purpose : toxics network.

The site is owned by MCAQD. ADEQ operates the toxics sampler at the site. The site is situated in South Phoenix, at the edge of a high population area, bordering a mixture of residential and commercial properties. Two high population areas are locate d north and west of the site.

Site Information AQS ID 04-013-4003 ADEQ ID 16377 Address 33 W. Tamarisk St. Phoenix, AZ 85041

County Maricopa Groundcover Asphalt

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.4030 Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude -112.0750

Distance to road 83 m – W Elevation 330 m Traffic count 19,110 – Central Ave. Site Established Date 01/01/1997

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Toxics Network or Program TOXICSUATMP Spatial Scale Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 08/05/2001

Site Photos

Aerial view of South Phoenix Shelter and meteorological tower at South Phoenix site – 04/2005

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 127Springerville Site Purpose : monitor smoke/public information.

The site is located on the roof of the Apache County Public Hea lth Services District building. There is an open field to the s outh and west of the site, with SR 180/SR 260 to the east, and buildings to the north.

Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID 135133 Address 323 S. Mountain Ave., Springerville, AZ 85936

County Apache Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA None Latitude 34.1284 Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude -109.2891

Distance to road 8 m – SW Elevation 2,125 m Traffic count 10,616 – S. Mountain Ave. Site Established Date 09/24/2008

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter PM 10 Network or Program ADEQ-E-BAM Spatial Scale Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 09/24/2008

Site Photos

Aerial view of Springerville Springerville E-BAM on roof of county building – 09/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 128Sycamore Canyon Site Purpose : monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program.

The site is located near the entrance to Camp Raymond Boy Scout Camp. Minimal obstructions exist in the area su rrounding the site and no routine human activity occurs in the area surrounding the site. Sycamor e Canyon Wilderness Area is 800 meters south of the site.

Site Information AQS ID 04-005-8103 ADEQ ID 16476 Address Camp Kimball Rd. Flagstaff, AZ (Camp Raymond)

County Coconino Groundcover Dirt/Grass

CBSA Flagstaff Latitude 35.1406 Surrounding Area Forest Longitude -111.9692

Distance to road 33 m – NW Elevation 2,046 m Traffic count 15,048 – I-40 Site Established Date 09/11/1991

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Aerosol Network or Program IMPROVE Spatial Scale Regional Parameter start date at site 09/11/1991

Site Photos

Regional view of Sycamore Canyon Shelter at Sycamore Canyon site – 09/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 129Tonto National Monument Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network, monitor regional haze, AQI forecasting, downwind transport from Phoeni x area, and IMPROVE program.

The site is jointly operated by ADEQ and USFS. The site is located at the base of Tonto National Monument, about 40 meters south of SR 188. The area surrounding the site is desert with Roosevelt Lake about 1,000 meters to the north in Tonto National Forest.

Site Information AQS ID 04-007-0010 ADEQ ID 16447 Address South of SR 188 Roosevelt, AZ 85545

County Gila Groundcover Dirt/Rock

CBSA Payson Latitude 33.6547 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -111.1074

Distance to road 17 m – NE Elevation 786 m Traffic count 1,073 – SR 188 Site Established Date 04/23/1988

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter O 3 Aerosol Network or Program SLAMS IMPROVE Spatial Scale Urban Urban Parameter start date at site 05/22/2002 04/23/1988

Site Photos

Regional view of Tonto NM Shelter at Tonto NM site – 03/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 130Vehicle Emissions Lab oratory Site Purpose : AIR Now, AQI forecasting, PAMS, speci al study, monitor urban haze, and meteorological support.

The site is located in the northwest corner of the Vehicle Emissions Laboratory property. The surrounding area is a both resident ial and commercial, with an open field directly to the north/northwest. The site is about 415 mete rs south of Red Mountain Freeway (Loop 202).

Site Information AQS ID 04-013-9998 ADEQ ID 16363 Address 600 N. 40 th St. Phoenix, AZ 85008

County Maricopa Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.4553 Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude -111.9961

Distance to road 66 m – E Elevation 356 m Traffic count 12,740 – 40 th St. Site Established Date 04/01/1987

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Bscat/PM 2.5 Wind Temp/RH Network or Program SPM/AIRNow ADEQ-MET ADEQ-MET Spatial Scale Neighborho od Neighborhood Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 06/25/2003 05/11/1999 05/11/1999

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Delta Temp Ultraviolet Solar Radiation Total Horizontal Solar Radiation Network or Program PAMS PAMS PAMS Spatial Scale Neighborho od Neighborhood Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 05/11/1999 08/20/2004 06/18/1999

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Wind Profiler Network or Program PAMS Spatial Scale Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 01/01/1998

Site Photos

Aerial view of Vehicl e Emissions Laboratory Wind profiler, meteorological tower, and shelter at VEL – 04/12/2005 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 131Verde Ranger Station Site Purpose : monitor smoke/public information

The site is located at the Verde Ranger Stati on in Camp Verde. The monitor is located on a metal platform that is on a concrete slab surrounded by dirt and rocks. Ranger Station buildings are to the northeast and northwest and there are sola r panels to the east of the monitor.

Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID 138696 Address 300 E. Highway 260 Camp Verde, AZ 86322

County Yavapai Groundcover Dirt

CBSA Prescott Latitude 34.5489 Surrounding Area Residential/Desert Longitude -111.8472

Distance to road 70 m – S Elevation 945 m Traffic count 6,075 – SR 260 Site Established Date 01/01/2008

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter PM 10 Network or Program ADEQ-E-BAM Spatial Scale Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 01/01/2008

Site Photos

Aerial view of Verde Ranger Station E-BAM on platform at Verde Ranger Station – 2/2010

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 132Yuma Supe rsite Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network and AQI forecasting.

The site was reopened in 2008 to take the place of the Yuma Game & Fish site and is used to indicate ozone transport into the Phoenix metr opolitan area from the Arizona/Mexico border. The particulate and the meteorological monitors have also been move d to this site to create one Yuma monitoring site. The site is located on the southeast corner of the Rural Metro Administration Facility propert y. The surrounding area is commer cial and industrial, with a dirt lot adjacent to the south a nd I-8 1 kilometer to the northeast.

Site Information AQS ID 04-027-8011 ADEQ ID 113219 Address 2323 S. Arizona Ave. Yuma, AZ 85364

County Yuma Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Yuma Latitude 32.6903 Surrounding Area Commercia l/Industrial Longitude -114.6144

Distance to road 91 m – W Elevation 60 m Traffic count 12,302 – Arizona Ave. Site Established Date 02/01/2006

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter O 3 PM 10 PM 2.5 Network or Program SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS Spatial Scale Neighborho od Neighborhood Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 05/06/2008 01/01/2010 01/01/2010

Monitoring Information Pollutant/Atmospheric parameter Wind Temp/RH Network or Program ADEQ-MET ADEQ-MET Spatial Scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Parameter start date at site 03/17/2010 03/17/2010

Site Photos

Aerial view of Yuma Supersite Shelter and Met Tower at Yuma Supersite – 5/19/2011

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 133Appendix E – 2011 EPA Monitoring ScheduleState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 134

### Appendix F – Bethune Elementary School Site Removal Rationale This document explains the Arizona Department of Environmental Qua lity’s rationale for removing the PM 10 special purpose monitor (SPM) from the Bethune Elementary School at the end of the second quarter 2011. This rationale in cludes the following issues:

1. Current and ongoing budgetary limitations require the redirection of non-essential (nonregulatory) resources. ADEQ no longer has the resources to conduct monitoring that is not required by regulation. The Bethune Elementary School monitor is an SPM and not required by the CFR.
2. The Maricopa County Air Quality Department’s PM 10 network provides sufficient coverage for attainment / nonattainment determ inations in Maricopa County.
3. The West 43 rd , Durango, South Phoenix, Greenwood, and Cent ral Phoenix sites provide data that are representative of the Bet hune Elementary School monitor.

The first two issues are straightforward and li kely well understood by Region 9. The third issue is examined in more detail below. It is evident from the figure, table, and graphs below that the Bethune Elementary School monitor, and the data from this monitor, is closely bracke ted by the five Maricopa County monitors. The Bethune Elementary School PM 10 monitor is located with in 3.5 miles of five other Maricopa County PM 10 monitors.

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 135Site Annual Weighted Arithmetic Mean ( μ g/m 3 )

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2005-2010 Average

West Forty Third 73.4 80.8 71.3 56. 5 50.6 39.4 62.0 Durango 65.9 69.7 59 47.7 44.4 36.2 53.8 Greenwood 51.9 52.4 49.5 42. 1 41.2 34.9 45.3 Bethune 58 61.2 53 43.6 44.6 30.3 48.5 South Phoenix 54.1 54.5 55 44.8 44 35 47.9 Central Phoenix 37.3 42.3 41.9 34. 8 34.4 27.4 36.4

Salt River Area PM 10 Monitors - Annual Weighted Arithmetic Means

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010Micrograms per cubic mete

Bethune Durango South Phoenix Greenw ood Central Phoenix West Forty Third

2005-2010 Average PM 10

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0

West Forty Third Durango Greenw ood Bethune South Phoenix Central Phoenix* SitePM10(ug/m3)

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 136

### Appendix G – Data Quality Indicator Report

This Appendix contains the required Quality As surance documentation for all SLAMS monitors in ADEQs SLAMS network. The Data Quality Indicat or Report is for the calendar year of 2010.

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2011, Page 137UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT

Apr. 19, 2011 Report Request ID: 862423 Report Code: AMP255

Selection Criteria Page 1 User ID: BNE

State County City

Site Parameter POC AQCR UAR CBSA CSA EPA Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date

04

80 GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

PROTOCOL SELECTIONS

Parameter
Classification Parameter Method Duration

APP_A_PARAMETERS PQAO SELECTIONS
Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality

SELECTED OPTIONS

INCLUDE ONLY APPENDIX A

MONITORS

RESTRICT TO MONITORING

SEASONS

MERGE PDF FILES Option Type Option Value

NO

YES

YES

GLOBAL DATES

2010 Start Date End Date

2010 01 01 12 31 TribalUNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM
Apr. 19, 2011 

## DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT

Page 1 of 11 

# Code Listing

The following codes may be seen in the "MT" column throughout this report. Please be advised that not all of the

codes may appear in the report. They are provided for completeness.

NR S P T SP I NC IX ID N NA CN F O PN ST VS QA X SS SU SU TS U UP W M NON-REGULATORY SLAMS PAMS TRIBAL MONITORS SPECIAL PURPOSE IMPROVE NCORE INDEX SITE INDUSTRIAL NAMS NATTS CASTNET NON-EPA FEDERAL OTHER PROPOSED NCORE SCHOOL AIR TOXICS VOL SCHOOL AT QA COLLOCATED SECURED SLAMS SPECIATION SUPLMNTL SPECIATION SUPPLMNTL SPECIATION TRENDS SPECIATION UNKNOWN UNOFFICIAL PAMS WHO WMO Code Description Description 

# Notes About this Report

If you see this value for a column in a summarized row, this means that more than one occurence exist in the summary. For example, if you have a PQAO summary that spans multiple States, you would see this value in the States column. M

Code For specific information about the fields appearing within this report, please refer to the README.txt file that is included with the WORKFILE output for this report.UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM
Apr. 19, 2011 

## DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT

Page 2 of 11 

## 1-Point Quality Control

CO

NO2

O3

SO2 Pollutant:

Pollutant:

Pollutant:

Pollutant: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality)

0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality)

0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality)

0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) PQAO:

PQAO:

PQAO:

PQAO: Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes App A?:

App A?:

App A?:

App A?: Year

Year

Year

Year Region

Region

Region

Region State

State

State

State Site ID

Site ID

Site ID

Site ID POC

POC

POC

POC MT

MT

MT

MT Begin

Date

Begin Date

Begin Date

Begin Date End

Date

End Date

End Date

End Date # Req

# Req

# Req

# Req # Obs

# Obs

# Obs

# Obs %

Complete

% Complete

% Complete

% Complete CV

CV

CV

CV Bias

Bias

Bias

Bias 2010 2010 SUMMARY

2010 2010 SUMMARY

2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 SUMMARY

2010 2010 2010 09

09 09

09 09 09

09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09

09 09 09 AZ AZ AZ

AZ AZ AZ

AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ

AZ AZ AZ 04-013-9997 SUMMARY

04-013-9997 SUMMARY

04-005-1008 04-007-0010 04-012-8000 04-013-9997 04-021-8001 04-025-8033 04-027-8011 SUMMARY

04-007-0009 04-007-1001 04-013-9997 1

1

1
1
1
1
1
1
1

1 3
1 S

S

S S S S-NC S S S

S S S 01-JAN-10

01-JAN-10

01-APR-10 01-APR-10 01-APR-10 01-JAN-10 01-APR-10 01-APR-10 01-APR-10

01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10

31-DEC-10

31-OCT-10 31-OCT-10 31-OCT-10 31-DEC-10 31-OCT-10 31-OCT-10 31-OCT-10

31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 26

26 26

26 26 26

15 15 15 26 15 15 15 116 116

26 26 26 24

24
24

19 19 19

15 13 15
24 13 15 15 110 110

22
27 25 92

92 92

73 73 73

100 87 100 92 87 100 100 95 95

85 100 96 4.43

4.43 4.43

3.55 3.55 3.55

0.75 1.30 1.69
2.12
1.24 0.99 1.07 1.51 1.51

3.92 3.55 4.09 3.65

3.65 3.65

3.45 3.45 3.45

1.69
1.24 3.34
1.72 1.03 2.35 0.65 1.53 1.53

3.16 3.20 3.24 +/- +/- +/-

-

-

-

+

+

+

+

+

+ +/-

+

+

+/-

- +/-UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM
Apr. 19, 2011 

## DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT

Page 3 of 11 

## 1-Point Quality Control

SO2 Pollutant: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) PQAO: Yes App A?:

Year Region State Site ID POC MT Begin Date End

Date # Req # Obs % Complete CV Bias
2010 SUMMARY 09

09 AZ AZ SUMMARY 78 78 74

74 94

94 3.61

3.61 2.89

2.89 +/- +/-UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM
Apr. 19, 2011 

## DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT

Page 4 of 11 

## Annual Performance Evaluations

CO

NO2

O3

SO2 Pollutant:

Pollutant:

Pollutant:

Pollutant: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality)

0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality)

0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality)

0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) PQAO:

PQAO:

PQAO:

PQAO: Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes Year

Year

Year

Year Region

Region

Region

Region State

State

State

State Site ID

Site ID

Site ID

Site ID POC

POC

POC

POC MT

MT

MT

MT Begin

Date

Begin Date

Begin Date

Begin Date End

Date

End Date

End Date

End Date 2010 2010 SUMMARY

2010 2010 SUMMARY

2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 SUMMARY

2010 2010 2010 09

09 09

09 09 09

09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09

09 09 09 AZ AZ AZ

AZ AZ AZ

AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ

AZ AZ AZ 04-013-9997 SUMMARY

04-013-9997 SUMMARY

04-005-1008 04-007-0010 04-012-8000 04-013-9997 04-021-8001 04-025-8033 04-027-8011 SUMMARY

04-007-0009 04-007-1001 04-013-9997 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 3 1 S

S

S S S S-NC S S S

S S S 01-JAN-10

01-JAN-10

01-APR-10 01-APR-10 01-APR-10 01-JAN-10 01-APR-10 01-APR-10 01-APR-10

01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10

31-DEC-10

31-OCT-10 31-OCT-10 31-OCT-10 31-DEC-10 31-OCT-10 31-OCT-10 31-OCT-10

31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 App A?:

App A?:

App A?:

App A?: 0.00
-2.63
2.63
-7.32
2.38
0.00
2.44
-0.36
-0.36 -1.25
-1.28
0.00
-4.94
0.00
0.00
0.00
-1.07
-1.07 0.95
0.95
0.95

5.93
5.93
5.93

-2.00
-0.68
0.00
-2.65
0.66
-1.33
0.00
-0.86
-0.86

5.00
1.66
-4.00 -0.98
-0.98
-0.98

2.81
2.81
2.81

-1.99
-0.81
0.00
-1.99
0.40
-1.60
-0.40
-0.91
-0.91

5.76
0.05
-4.80 -0.82
-0.82
-0.82

2.05
2.05
2.05

-2.60
-0.71
-1.18
-1.17
0.47
-1.89
0.00
-1.01
-1.01

5.92
-0.31
-4.82 4 4 4

0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 3 0 4 4 4

4 4 4

5 0 0 0 0 5 5 15 15

0 0 3 4 4 4

4 4 4

0 5 5 5 5 0 0 20 20

4 4 0 4 4 4

0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 4 0 Avg %D / Level

Avg %D / Level

Avg %D / Level

Avg %D / Level L1

L1

L1

L1 L2

L2

L2

L2 L3

L3

L3

L3 L4

L4

L4

L4 L5

L5

L5

L5 Q1

Q1

Q1

Q1 Q2

Q2

Q2

Q2 Q3

Q3

Q3

Q3 Q4

Q4

Q4

Q4 Obs / Q

Obs / Q

Obs / Q

Obs / Q Met?

Met?

Met?

Met? Criteria

Criteria

Criteria

Criteria Y

Y

Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Y Y Y 100 100

100 100

100 100 -6.59 -6.59

-7.27 -7.27

-1.52 -1.52 7.35 7.35

3.53 3.53

3.88 3.88 Conf. Limits

Conf. Limits

Conf. Limits

Conf. Limits Lower

Lower

Lower

Lower Upper

Upper

Upper

Upper 88

88

63 63

71 71 % Btwn

% Btwn

% Btwn

% Btwn Conf.

Conf.

Conf.

Conf. 1-Point

1-Point

1-Point

1-PointUNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM
Apr. 19, 2011 

## DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT

Page 5 of 11 

## Annual Performance Evaluations

SO2 Pollutant: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) PQAO: Yes

Year Region State Site ID POC MT Begin Date End

Date 2010 SUMMARY 09

09 AZ AZ SUMMARY App A?:

0.89
0.89 0.34
0.34 0.26
0.26 3 3 3 3 8 8 4 4 Avg %D / Level L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Obs / Q Met?

Criteria

100 100 -6.44 -6.44 6.18 6.18 Conf. Limits Lower Upper 100

100 % Btwn Conf. 1-PointUNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM
Apr. 19, 2011 

## DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT

Page 6 of 11 

## Flow Rate Verifications

PM10

PM2.5 Pollutant:

Pollutant: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality)

0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) PQAO:

PQAO: Yes

Yes App A?:

App A?: Year

Year Region

Region State

State Site ID

Site ID POC

POC MT

MT Begin

Date

Begin Date End

Date

End Date # Req

# Req # Obs

# Obs % Complete

% Complete Bias

Bias 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 SUMMARY

2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 SUMMARY 09

09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09

09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ

AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ 04-003-0011 04-003-0011 04-003-1005 04-005-1008 04-007-0008 04-007-0008 04-007-1001 04-013-8006 04-013-9997 04-015-1003 04-019-0001 04-019-0020 04-019-0020 04-023-0004 04-023-0004 04-025-2002 04-027-8011 SUMMARY

04-003-1005 04-005-1008 04-013-9997 04-013-9997 04-023-0004 04-023-0004 04-025-2002 04-027-8011 SUMMARY 1

2 1 1 1 2 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3

1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 S QA S S S QA S SP S S S S S S SP S S

S S S-NC QA S QA S S 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-APR-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10

01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10

31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 30-MAR-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10

31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 12

12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 2 9 12 12 12 12 191 191

12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 96 96 14

13 13 12 13 13 15 13 14 12 14 5 11 13 15 12 13 215 215

13 12 13 13 13 13 12 13 102 102 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1.74

1.88 5.98 1.48 1.54 1.07 2.55 1.04 1.86 0.95 1.03 0.71 2.83 1.47 0.92 0.77 1.73 1.38 1.38

1.14 1.53 1.63 1.60 1.21 1.21 0.42 0.92 1.01 1.01 +/- +/-

-

- +/- +/-

- +/-

-
+ +/-

+ +/- +/- +/- +/-

- +/- +/-

+/-

-
+ +/- +/-

+ +/- +/- +/- +/- Average % D

Average % D 0.09 -0.68 -2.40 -0.94 0.11 -0.29 -1.65 -0.28 -0.97 0.37 -0.23 0.41 -0.06 -0.15 -0.21 -0.04 -1.42 -0.54 -0.54

-0.27 -0.75 1.03 -0.28 -0.34 0.16 0.18 -0.16 -0.05 -0.05UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM
Apr. 19, 2011 

## DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT

Page 7 of 11 

## Semi-Annual Flow Rate Audits

PM10

PM10

PM2.5 Pollutant:

Pollutant:

Pollutant: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality)

0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality)

0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) PQAO:

PQAO:

PQAO: No

Yes

Yes Year

Year Region

Region State

State Site ID

Site ID POC

POC MT

MT Begin

Date

Begin Date End

Date

End Date 2010 2010 2010 SUMMARY

2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 SUMMARY 25

25 25 25

09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 MX MX MX MX

AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ 80-026-0005 80-026-1000 SUMMARY

04-003-0011 04-003-0011 04-003-1005 04-005-1008 04-007-0008 04-007-0008 04-007-1001 04-013-8006 04-013-9997 04-015-1003 04-019-0001 04-019-0020 04-019-0020 04-023-0004 04-023-0004 04-025-2002 04-027-8011 SUMMARY 1

1

1 2 1 1 1 2 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 NR-SP NR-SP

S QA S S S QA S SP S S S S S S SP S S 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10

01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-APR-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10

31-DEC-10

31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 30-MAR-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 App A?:

App A?:

App A?: 2 2 4 4

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 32 32 0 0 0 0

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 32 32 0

0 0 0

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 -0.1 1.0 -1.7 -1.6 -2.0 -0.8 -0.6 -1.3 -1.5 0.6 -1.4

-3.4 -0.6 -1.3 -1.0 -3.2 -1.3 -1.3 # Req

# Req #Q w/ Data

#Q w/ Data Avg %d

Avg %d Met?

Met? Criteria

Criteria

Criteria N N

Y Y Y N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 0 0

82 82 -4.72 -4.72 3.64 3.64 Conf. Limits

Conf. Limits

Conf. Limits Lower

Lower Upper

Upper

97

97 % Between

% Between

% Between Conf. Limits

Conf. Limits Flow Rate

Flow Rate

Flow Rate % Complete

% Complete 1

1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0

0 1 1 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1

2 0 0 1 1 9 9 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0

0 1 1 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1

1 0 0 1 1 8 8 Q1

Q1 Q2

Q2 Q3

Q3 Q4

Q4 Obs / Q

Obs / Q

Obs / QUNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM
Apr. 19, 2011 

## DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT

Page 8 of 11 

## Semi-Annual Flow Rate Audits

PM2.5 Pollutant: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) PQAO: Yes

Year Region State Site ID POC MT Begin Date End

Date 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 SUMMARY 09

09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ 04-003-1005 04-005-1008 04-013-9997 04-013-9997 04-023-0004 04-023-0004 04-025-2002 04-027-8011 SUMMARY 1

1 1 2 1 2 1 1 S S S-NC QA S QA S S 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 01-JAN-10 31-DEC-10

31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 App A?:

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 16 16 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 17 17 100

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 -1.0 -1.6 0.5 -1.0 -0.8 -0.7 -1.4 -2.1 -0.9 -0.9 # Req #Q w/ Data Avg %d Met? Criteria

Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y 88 88 -2.29 -2.29 2.19 2.19 Conf. Limits Lower Upper

76

76 % Between Conf. Limits Flow Rate % Complete 1

0 1 0 1 1 0 0 4 4 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 5 5 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 4 4 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 4 4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Obs / QUNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM
Apr. 19, 2011 

## DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT

Page 9 of 11 

## Collocation Detail

PM10

PM2.5 Pollutant:

Pollutant: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality)

0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) PQAO:

PQAO: Yes

Yes App A?:

App A?: Year

Year Region

Region State

State Site ID

Site ID POC

POC MT

MT Begin

Date

Begin Date End

Date

End Date # Req

# Req # Obs

# Obs %

Complete

% Complete CV

CV 2010 2010

2010 2010 09 09

09 09 AZ AZ

AZ AZ 04-003-0011 04-007-0008

04-023-0004 04-013-9997 1
1

1
1 S S

S S-NC 01-JAN-10

01-JAN-10

02-JAN-10 02-JAN-10 31-DEC-10

31-DEC-10

28-DEC-10 31-DEC-10 30

30

30 30 55

58

57
111 100

100

100 100 9.40

7.67

11.94 8.08 81102 81102

88101 88101 Parameter Code

Parameter Code Method

Method
143 145 # Valid

# Valid 54 58

56 107UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM
Apr. 19, 2011 

## DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT

Page 10 of 11 

## Collocation Summary

PM10

PM10

PM2.5 Pollutant:

Pollutant:

Pollutant: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality)

0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality)

0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) PQAO:

PQAO:

PQAO: No

Yes

Yes App A?:

App A?:

App A?: Year

Year

Year Region

Region

Region State

State

State # Req

# Req

# Req # Obs

# Obs

# Obs %

Complete

% Complete

% Complete CV

CV

CV 2010 SUMMARY

2010 SUMMARY

2010 2010 2010 SUMMARY 25 25

09 09

09 09 09 09 MX MX

AZ AZ

AZ AZ AZ AZ 30

60

30 30 0

113

57 111 0 0

100 100

100 100 100 100 8.15

8.15

11.94 8.08 9.48 9.48 # Sites

# Sites

# Sites 2

13

5 1 # Collocated Required

# Collocated Required

# Collocated Required 1

2

1 1 # Actually Collocated

# Actually Collocated

# Actually Collocated 0

2

1 1 % Req. Sites

Collocated

% Req. Sites Collocated

% Req. Sites Collocated 0 0

100 100

100 100 100 100 143 145 SUMMARY Method

Method

Method # Valid Obs

# Valid Obs

# Valid Obs 0 0

112 112

56 107 163 163UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM
Apr. 19, 2011 

## DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT

Page 11 of 11 

## Performance Evaluation Program (PEP)

PM2.5 Pollutant: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) PQAO: Yes App A?:

Year Region State # Collocated PEP Coll. %

Complete Bias 2010 SUMMARY 09

09 AZ AZ 0 25 25 # Sites
6 #PEP Required
8 # PEP Collected
2 # Collocated PEP Req
0 Conf. Limits Lower Upper