alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

       
<ARTICLE> 5
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         204,752
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,248,250
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (345,028)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,116,597
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,495,539
<PP&E>                                       1,400,593
<DEPRECIATION>                                 153,674
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,686,358
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,972,028
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,851,687
<OTHER-SE>                                  (7,149,406)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,686,358
<SALES>                                      2,841,874
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,841,874
<CGS>                                        2,405,648
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,405,648
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                43,426
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,840
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,174,920)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,174,920)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,174,920)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.16)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 614 Agreed to House (ATH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 614

Providing for the printing of a revised edition of the Rules and Manual 
  of the House of Representatives for the One Hundred Eighth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 14, 2002

Mr. Armey submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the printing of a revised edition of the Rules and Manual 
  of the House of Representatives for the One Hundred Eighth Congress.

    Resolved, That a revised edition of the Rules and Manual of the 
House of Representatives for the One Hundred Eighth Congress be printed 
as a House document, and that three thousand additional copies shall be 
printed and bound for the use of the House of Representatives, of which 
nine hundred copies shall be bound in leather with thumb index and 
delivered as may be directed by the Parliamentarian of the House.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 6.39 Payment of award.

An applicant seeking payment of an award from the Department of Transportation or any of its operating administrations under this part shall submit a copy of the Department of Transportation's or any of its operating administration's final decisions granting the award, accompanied by a statement that the applicant will not seek review of the decision in the United States courts. The copy of the decision and the statement should be submitted to the head of the affected operating administration or the Secretary of Transportation, where the Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary, has initiated the proceedings.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 78 (Wednesday, April 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 22756]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09219]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Federal Environmental Statutes, Regulations, and Executive Orders 
Applicable to the Development and Review of Transportation 
Infrastructure Projects

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Department of Transportation (Department) 
has prepared a document listing Federal environmental statutes, 
regulations, and Executive Orders that establish requirements 
applicable to the development and review of transportation 
infrastructure projects. The Department strives to ensure compliance 
with these requirements in a manner that is both environmentally sound 
and expeditious. The goal of this document is to contribute to this 
important effort by providing a brief description of the primary 
statutes, regulations, and Executive Orders applicable to the 
development and review of these transportation infrastructure projects.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Coyle, Senior Attorney Advisor, 
U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the General Counsel; 1200 
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Telephone 202-366-0691.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Department of 
Transportation (Department or DOT) has prepared a document listing 
Federal environmental statutes, regulations, and Executive Orders that 
establish requirements applicable to the development and review of 
transportation infrastructure projects that receive financial support 
from the Department. DOT strives to meet these requirements in a manner 
that is both environmentally sound and expeditious. The goal of this 
list is to contribute to this important effort by providing a brief 
description of the primary statutes, regulations, and Executive Orders 
applicable to the development and review of these transportation 
infrastructure projects. Additionally, many agencies have developed 
guidance to assist in implementation of the law, and this document 
references certain guidance. This summary is not, and should not be 
relied upon as, a complete list of statutes, regulations, and Executive 
Orders that could apply to a transportation infrastructure project or 
an official or independent interpretation or expression of policy on 
the matters summarized. This document replaces the notice, ``Federal 
Environmental Laws and Executive Orders Applicable to Development and 
Review of Transportation Infrastructure Projects,'' 69 FR 25451, May 6, 
2004.
    The document is available online at http://www.dot.gov/policy/transportation-policy/environment/laws.

    Issued in Washington, DC on April 10, 2014.
Kathryn B. Thomson,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2014-09219 Filed 4-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
#### PAULINA HECKY AND CHRIST HECKY, HER HUSBAND, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. FOX ELIZABETH THEATRE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Argued October 6, 1932

Decided March 3, 1933.

*154Before Justices Bodine and Donges.

Por the defendant-appellant, *John F. Ryan*and *Merritt Lane.*

Por the plaintiffs-respondents, *Norbert T. Burke.*

Per Curiam.

The ease comes before us because of the failure of the trial judge to grant a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The Court of Errors and Appeals, in *Gee*v. *Moss,*108 *N. J. L.*160; 156 *Atl. Rep.*458, assuming that the abuse of discretion in not granting a new trial might be appealable, considered the matter upon the merits. The case of *Gaffney*v. *Illingsworth,*90 *N. J. L.*490; 101 *Atl. Rep.*243, was cited. But that case does not hold that the matter is appeal-able. In the case of *Giordano*v. *Asbury Park and Ocean Grove Bank,*103 *N. J. L.*194; 135 *Atl. Rep.*354, it was held: “Whether a rule to show cause shall be made absolute or discharged is a matter resting in the discretion of the court. The discretion exercised in disposing of a rule to show cause is not reviewable. *Clark*v. *Swersky,*3 *N. J. Mis. R.*432; 128 *Atl. Rep.*613.”

The rule quoted finds support in the early cases.

The denial of an application for a new trial will not be reviewed. *Furman*v. *Applegate, 23 N. J. L.*28. Whether a new trial will be granted on the ground of newly discovered evidence is within the discretion of the court. *Hoban*v. *Sanford & Stillman Co.,*64 *N. J. L.*426; 45 *Atl. Rep.*819. Mr. Justice Ogden said in *Furman*v. *Applegate, supra:*“An application for setting aside a verdict, and awarding a new trial, is always addressed to the judicial discretion of a court, and error cannot be urged against such exercise of that *155discretion. It is true that the judges have sealed a bill prepared upon that exception; but it not being a proper matter for a bill, it cannot be examined into by this court on writ of error.”

We have, however, examined the matters presented to the trial judge, and can only conclude that his determination was well within the exercise of a sound judicial discretion, but, by having so done, it is not to be understood that we regard the matter before us because we do not.

The appellant also argues that there was no evidence of negligence and that the defendant was barred from recovery by contributory negligence. The weight of evidence was argued on the return of the rule. This necessarily included a determination of the question raised on a motion to nonsuit or direct a verdict. The defendant cannot argue the weight of evidence on the whole case and reserve for argument the question of contributory negligence. The attack upon the verdict as against the weight of evidence precludes us from determining whether there was proof of negligence, or whether the action was barred by contributory negligence. When the trial court passed upon the weight of evidence it necessarily determined both of those questions. *Freschie*v. *Mason,*108 *N. J. L.*272; 156 *Atl. Rep.*758.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Ex Parte Grove Chestnutt.

No. 1874.

Decided November 9, 1898.

County Convict—Habeas Corpus Not Available, When.

An application for babeas corpus to the Court of Criminal Appeals by a county convict will be dismissed where it is made to appear that since filing said application" he has been released from custody upon bond.

From Palo Pinto. Original application to the Court of Criminal Appeals for a writ of habeas corpus.

The Assistant Attorney-General moved to dismiss the application,“because the return of the sheriff of Palo Pinto County to the writ of *625habeas corpus shows that said Chestnutt is not in custody, but has executed a convict bond and is now at liberty.

*J. M. Richards,*for relator.

*Mann Trice,*Assistant Attorney-General, for respondent.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Delator applied to the presiding judge of this court for a writ of habeas corpus, which was granted, and made returnable on the 19th of October, 1898, before this court in session at Tyler. In response to the writ the respondent makes return that the relator had executed a convict bond to the proper county judge, to wit, of Palo Pinto County, in regard to the matter about which he resorted to said writ, and had been released from custody. For this reason the Assistant Attorney-General moves to dismiss the application from the docket. We believe the motion is well taken, and the application is accordingly dismissed.

*Dismissed.*

Hurt, Presiding Judge, absent.
From: Derek Lowe [mailto:derekb.lowe@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2010 10:57 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Include RIN 1210-AB33

If I understand this proposal correctly, the idea is to convert retirement accounts into an 

annuity-like instrument. I strongly oppose this idea as unduly restrictive and paternalistic. 

While many investors could make better choices with their retirement money, I think that 

in this case the proposed cure is worse than the disease. 

Derek Lowe 

Acton, MA 

derekb.lowe@gmail.com
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Hudson C. Tanner, Appellant, v. The Board of Supervisors of Herkimer County, Respondent.

In the matter of stenographer’s notes, taken by the late stenographer of the Supreme Court, Fifth Judicial District, of notes that have been damaged by water and fire. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements in one-case only. Opinion by Boardman, J.
MEMORANDUM

DATE: July 29, 2014

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR

– 2013

- 0602

FROM: Ray Saracino , EPA

SUBJECT: July 23, 2014 , M eeting Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power

Plants

SUMMARY

A meeting was held between EPA and the attendees listed on the attached sheet on July

23, 2014 to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

. The Clean Power

Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2

, 2014

.

ATTENDEES

See attached.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.21 MB)
 
 U.S. BS 17 Bright Star 2017 Exercise Bright Star 17 Centcom
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Page 1 of 2

AEC-HBURAC

INU DIVISION AUG aug
CASON & REGULATIONS

BRANCHS

As of: August 05, 2010
Received: August 04,

PUBLIC atu Poa. oxo

SUBMISSION freching Ne, 02000

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0024
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: glenn h. tecker
Address:
31 perry drive
trenton, NJ, 08628
Email: gtecker@tecker.com
Phone: 609-771-0244
Submitter's Representative: Holt
Organization: Tecker Consultants LLC

General Comment

August 4, 2010

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Room 445-G Hubert H. Humphrey Building

200 Independence Ave. SW

Washington, DC 20201

Re: OCIIO-991-IFC, The Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance
Coverage Relating to Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act

On behalf of the American Society of Association Executives (ASAE), we appreciate the
opportunity to comment on the Interim Final Rules regarding grandfathered health plans under
the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. ASAE is a section 501(c)(6) individual
membership organization of more than 22,000 association executives and industry partners
representing nearly 12,000 tax-exempt organizations. Its members manage leading trade
associations, individual membership societies, and voluntary organizations across the United

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 8/5/2010


Page 2 of 2

States.

It is important to note that most of our members are small and medium sized tax-exempt
organizations. In fact, the average association has 11 employees and has the same obstacles to
obtaining good, affordable health insurance coverage confronting small businesses in general
The organizations that our members represent are often captive to a small number of health
insurance providers, and do not have the economic clout of larger enterprises.

The vast majority of the organizations represented by our members purchase heath insurance for
their employees that is fully insured. They generally do not have the resources or ability to self-
insure as a means to control their health insurance costs and benefits. Most of these
organizations will greatly benefit from the expanded options for health insurance that will be
available beginning in 2014 through the Exchange. The Exchange will allow the small and
medium-sized organizations that our members represent to benefit from the economics of pooling
that is not currently available,

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 8/5/2010
# SQUIRE:: PATTON BOGGS Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP 1200 19th Street, NW Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 20036 ch a rles. d o n IevCa) sa u i re pb. com +1.202.626.6840

September 23, 2014 

### VIA EMAIL Mr. Robert Finamore Chief, Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Division U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590
Re: Polynesian Limited—Request for Thirty-Day Extension of Cabotage Operations, Docket DOT-OST-2014-0144 Dear Mr. Finamore: In accordance with the Department of Transportation's Notice of Action Taken issued August 28, 2014, in the captioned docket, I am writing on behalf of Polynesian Limited ("Polynesian") to request approval of an additional thirty days of cabotage operations between Pago Pago and the Manu'a Islands, American Samoa. Polynesian requests approval of cabotage operations through October 30, 2014, with deferral of the remainder. The circumstances described in Polynesian's initial application have not changed. Polynesian's application continues to meet the requirements of 49 USC 40109(g) for grant of an emergency cabotage exemption. The Pago Pago-Manu'a Islands route remains without U.S. carrier service. Polynesian is the only air carrier able to provide much needed transportation between the two points and thus prevent severe hardship to American Samoa residents. Indeed, in addition to operating regular service Polynesian has been called upon to provide medical evacuation during the past thirty days. There is a clear need for continued service for an additional thirty days. Please contact the undersigned with any questions.Mr. Robert Finamore September 23, 2014 Page 2 Very truly yours,



# ~ ~ Charles F. DonleyII

cc: Office of the Governor Executive Office Building, Third Floor, Utulei Pago Pago, American Samoa 96799 Fax: 011 684-633-2269 jhi

~ cooley.com ; perkmannCa

~ cooley.com ; bberlin _cooley.com alex.sene.j

~~ gmail.com steve.morrisseyCa)_united.com; dan.weiss a CD_united.com pdoell(aD-naca.cc
Soldiers supporting Afghan girls' education
 By Capt. Marvin Baker , 136th Maneuver Enhancement Brigade
  Lt. Col. Stephanie Purgerson poses for a photograph with young residents of a Kabul area village near Camp Phoenix, Oct. 12, 2012. Purgerson is the camp commander and conducts foot patrols throughout the community to learn how Soldiers can better support Afghanistan. (Photo by Capt. Marvin Baker)
 KABUL, Afghanistan (Dec. 13, 2012) — As part of the ongoing effort to assist Afghanistan’s female residents, U.S. Soldiers regularly host bazaars for businesswomen.  While this is nothing new, efforts are now expanding to include the building and renovation of schools where girls can receive a quality education. “What we are trying to do is invest in the women and the families here in Afghanistan, and specifically our neighbors in Ud Khiel, so that they can support themselves and their families,” said Lt. Col. Stephanie Purgerson, Camp Phoenix Base commander. The camp bazaar isn’t new, but camp leaders are taking a new approach when deciding who receives access. In the past, more than 100 vendors from all over Afghanistan and the United States would pack into the camp’s square. Now, said Chief Warrant Officer Beau Tidrick, who works with the local vendors, organizers ask the Ud Khiel leaders and the long-term venders on the camp who might best benefit from gaining access to a business and customers on Camp Phoenix. In Afghanistan’s male-dominated society, a woman’s value is determined by her ability to bear and raise children. Although few men here consider how women might otherwise contribute to the family, Kabul is steadily changing the way it thinks. “It’s the local men here who are supporting the local women,” said Purgerson. In addition to hosting the recurring bazaars, Purgerson also supports the education plans of a local girls’ school principal. Ten years ago, most women in Afghanistan where not allowed to attend school. Since then, Afghan women have seen gains in support for education, economic roles at home and community interaction. Coalition forces also support the increasing importance women have in the future of Afghanistan’s security and stability. The camp’s projects to build and refurbish schools will prove invaluable for building a foundation for Afghan education. These schools, especially the girls’ schools around Ud Khiel are currently little more than pitched canvas tents on donated land. “The school principal isn’t needy, but needs help understanding how to negotiate the Afghan education system,” Purgerson said. “We want to help bridge the gap, build capacity and impart business skills, and we will continue to do that.”
#### Perry J. Tobin, Respondent, v. James H. Fisher, Appellant.

Motion for reargument and to amend 'the record denied. No costa of motion.