alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: tjsbocaj@gmail.com [mailto:tjsbocaj@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 9:03 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

I consider my 401k to be the only means by which I may someday retire. Being a young 

man of 26, I have no hope in the United States to adequately provide for me and my wife 

in retirement. I am of the firm belief that government, guided by only the best of 

intentions, has consistently proven that collectivist schemes such as those proposed to 

fund retirement have failed miserably. This, I am sure, is due to a myriad of reasons, the 

least of which being the lack of ability to do that which is politically unpopular: cutting 

benefits in the face of insolvency. 

I have no delusions of wealth or grandeur in retirement, and I conservatively estimate that 

I will require something on the order of 1.5 to 2 million dollars just to maintain a lifestyle 

much like the one I have today (which is far from lavish, I can assure you). I am squarely 

in the middle class, I am not a high earner, nor am I rich. I simply want to build the kind 

of diversified security that the United States and the Treasury cannot deliver. 

In another sense, I consider the idea of a forced annuitizing of my 401k to be an offense 

to my liberties as an American, a consumer, and an investor. In essence, the seizure of my 

property in the form of company ownership by the government rails against everything 

that this country has stood for since its beginning. Another way of seeing this is that the 

money I put away in a retirement plan goes into the economy where it is needed most. 

Money that I invest in banks find their way to people who need capital for new 

investments creating jobs, or perhaps a young couple who needs a loan for a house or 

important purchase. Money that I invest in medical companies might be used as funds for 

the research and development of some new miracle cure, or a wonderful new medical 

procedure for increasing the length and quality of life of someone who might have 

suffered otherwise. 

Tell me please, what wonderful plans does the government have for my money? 

Federally subsidized loans for people with terrible credit and no down payment? Some 

road project that will be completed over budget and behind schedule? Perhaps our failing 

school system? Law enforcement for wrong-minded immigration and drug policies? 

I know I am just one person, easily brushed off and forgotten in a mass angry of emails. 

But know this: I will endorse candidates of any party who openly oppose this idea. 

Nothing but the complete dismissal of this idea will bring peace of mind and restore to 

some small degree my confidence in our national leadership.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 582 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                      November 15 (legislative day, November 14), 2002.
Whereas the prevalence of runaway and homeless situations among youth is 
        staggering, with studies suggesting that between 1,300,000 and 2,800,000 
        youth live on the streets of the United States each year;
Whereas running away from home is widespread, with 1 out of every 7 youth in the 
        United States running away from home before the age of 18;
Whereas runaway youth most often are youth who have been expelled from their 
        homes by their families, physically, sexually, and emotionally abused at 
        home, discharged by State custodial systems without adequate transition 
        plans, separated from their parents through death and divorce, too poor 
        to secure their own basic needs, and ineligible or unable to access 
        adequate medical or mental health resources;
Whereas effective programs supporting runaway youth and assisting youth and 
        their families in remaining at home succeed because of partnerships 
        created among families, community-based human service agencies, law 
        enforcement agencies, schools, faith-based organizations, and 
        businesses;
Whereas preventing youth from running away from home and supporting youth in 
        high-risk situations is a family, community, and national priority;
Whereas the future well-being of the Nation is dependent on the opportunities 
        provided for youth and families to acquire the knowledge, skills, and 
        abilities necessary for youth to develop into safe, healthy, and 
        productive adults;
Whereas the National Network for Youth and its members advocate on behalf of 
        runaway and homeless youth and provide an array of community-based 
        supports that address their critical needs;
Whereas the National Runaway Switchboard provides crisis intervention and 
        referrals to reconnect runaway youth to their families and to link youth 
        to local resources that provide positive alternatives to running away 
        from home; and
Whereas the National Network for Youth and National Runaway Switchboard are co-
        sponsoring National Runaway Prevention Month, during the month of 
        November, to increase public awareness of the life circumstances of 
        youth in high-risk situations and the need for safe, healthy, and 
        productive alternatives, resources, and supports for youth, families, 
        and communities: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes and supports the 
goals and ideals of ``National Runaway Prevention Month''.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2478 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2478

        For the relief of the Sara, Jade, and Jordan Hutchings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 12, 1995

 Mr. Metcalf introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        For the relief of the Sara, Jade, and Jordan Hutchings.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENTITLEMENT TO CHILDREN'S INSURANCE BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
application for children's insurance benefits under section 202(d) of 
the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 402(d)) filed by Barbara Ingmire on 
behalf of Sara, Jade, and Jordan Hutchings of Mulkilteo, Washington, 
the surviving children of Peter Hutchings, shall be deemed to have been 
filed before September 30, 1986.
    (b) Payment.--Any benefits to which Sara, Jade, and Jordan 
Hutchings are entitled for the period prior to the date of enactment of 
this Act shall be paid to them in a lump sum.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES.

    It shall be unlawful for an amount that exceeds 10 percent of the 
sum described in section 1 to be paid to or received by any agent or 
attorney for any service rendered in connection with the benefits 
provided by this Act. Any person who violates this section shall be 
guilty of an infraction and shall be subject to a fine in the amount 
provided in title 18, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
From: Joanne Novarro [mailto:jcnovarro@optonline.net] 

Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2010 8:50 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

No, NO NOOOO. I am fiercely opposed to the government taking any money from 

my retirement savings and converting it into annuities. I am a registered voter and 

actually VOTE in every election. Keep your paws off my dough!

 

Joanne C. Novarro 

323 Brower Ave. 

Rockville Centre, NY 11570
------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of 1 

'LBGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 


PUBLICATION &. REGULATIONS As of: August 20, 2010 BRANCH Received: August 09, 2010 PUBLIC Status: Posted

Posted: August 20, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2c6b1 SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfather,~d 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-201O-001O-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0240 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

---------------------------------------------------------------,--­

Submitter Information 

Name: Leslie Ann Earl 

Address: 

Seward, AK, 

Submitter's Representative: self 

Organization: self 

Government Agency: HRSA 

General Comment 

See attached file(s) 

Attachments 

IRS-2010-0010-0240.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

https:llfdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency Icomponentl submitterlnfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/20/2010 
August 9, 2010 

Office of Consumer Infonnation and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to fonnally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-20 10­

0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these 

regulations. 

Leslie A. Earl
# Den Europæiske Unions C 153A/10.

| | ISSN 1725-2393 |
| --- | --- |
| Den Europæiske Unions
  Tidende | C 153A |
| | |
| Dansk udgave | Meddelelser og oplysninger | 47. årgang10. juni 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2393

Den Europæiske Unions

Tidende

C 153A

Dansk udgave

Meddelelser og oplysninger

47. årgang10. juni 2004

---

| Informationsnummer | Indhold | Side |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Oplysninger |
| | Rådet |
| 2004/C 153A/1 | Stillingsopslag (Ref. A/013) | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Indhold

Side

III   Oplysninger

Rådet

2004/C 153A/1

Stillingsopslag (Ref. A/013)

1

| DA | |
| --- | --- |

DA

---

III Oplysninger

Rådet

| 10.6.2004 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | CA 153/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2004

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

CA 153/1

---

STILLINGSOPSLAG

(Ref. A/013)

FULDMÆGTIG

(2004/C 153 A/01)

Som led i den fælles europæiske sikkerheds- og forsvarspolitik (FESFP) ønsker Generalsekretariatet for Rådet at besætte en stilling som fuldmægtig i lønklasse A*9 i Generaldirektorat E – Eksterne forbindelser – Direktorat VIII, der beskæftiger sig med forsvarsspørgsmål.

Yderligere oplysninger (på engelsk og fransk) og ansøgningsskema kan fås ved at kontakte Udvælgelses- og Ansættelseskontoret på følgende e-mail-adresse: service.recrutement@consilium.eu.int eller via dets websted: http://ue.eu.int/concours.

Ansøgningsfrist: den 9. juli 2004, idet poststemplet er afgørende.

---
----

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 3 March 2004

in Case C-395/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen): Transport Service NV v Belgische Staat and Bea Cars BVBA (1)

(Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - First and Sixth VAT Directives - Principle of fiscal neutrality - Application of VAT to each production and distribution transaction - Recovery)

(2004/C 94/30)

Language of the case: Dutch

In Case C-395/02; reference to the Court under Article 234 EC from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen (Belgium) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Transport Service NV and Belgische Staat, Bea Cars BVBA, third party — on the interpretation of the principle of the neutrality of the common system of value added tax — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of C. Gulmann, President of the Chamber, S. von Bahr (Rapporteur) and R. Silva de Lapuerta, Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has made an order on 3 March 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

The principle of the neutrality of the common system of value added tax does not preclude a Member State from recovering value added tax, after the event, from a taxable person which has wrongly invoiced a supply of goods as being exempt from that tax. It is irrelevant, in that regard, whether the value added tax on the later sale of the goods concerned to the end user has been paid to the public purse or not.

----

(1)OJ C 7 of 11.1.2003.

----
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.07 MB)
 
 The Jordanian Border Guard and Soldiers with 5th Squadron 4th Cavalry Regiment completed five weeks of combined training at the Jordanian Border Guard Training School Jordan Jan. 20.
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
# Abbey Gate Supplemental Review Findings

/ Published April 15, 2024

April 15, 2024Release Number 20240415-01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla. –** In August 2023, the commander of U.S. Central Command directed U.S. Army Central (ARCENT) to conduct supplemental interviews to examine new information made available during public testimony and other public statements in 2023 related to the Aug. 26, 2021, terrorist attack at Abbey Gate outside Hamid KarzaiInternational Airport (HKIA) in Kabul, Afghanistan.This supplemental review included interviews with more than 50 service members who were directly involved in evacuation operations at Abbey Gate, including 12 service members who were previously unavailable due to medical evacuation or treatment. The review sought to determine whether the new information would affect thefindings of the original Abbey Gate 15-6 investigation completed in November 2021.The supplemental review specifically sought to determine the following: 1) whether an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) test run occurred near Abbey Gate on August 21, 2021; 2) whether, before the attack occurred, service members identified in the crowd the suicide bomber who committed the attack; and 3) whether service members posted at or around Abbey Gate had an opportunity to engage the bomber prior to the attack. The review also focused on the Taliban’s use of excessive force and the decision to consolidate the defensive perimeter around Abbey Gate before the attack.Over five months, a team of 13 service members from both the Marine Corps and the Army travelled to 24 locations, conducted more than 50 interviews, and compiled more than 1,200 additional pages of documents, information, and imagery.The supplemental review was completed on January 16, 2024. Senior departmental leadership were informed of the supplemental review’s findings and recommendations in February 2024. We are in the process of briefing Gold Star Families of the 13 service members on the review’s findings.

After a thorough review, the following findings were made or otherwise confirmed:• The terrorist attack at Abbey Gate was not preventable at the tactical level without degrading the mission to maximize the number of evacuees.• Leaders at Abbey Gate were present, engaged, and made sound tactical decisions.• The suicide bomber was not previously identified in the crowd, nor was there an opportunity for service members to engage him prior to the attack on August 26, 2021.• Though unable to be ruled out completely, it is unlikely that an IED test run occurred outside Abbey Gate on August 21, 2021.• Taliban forces outside Abbey Gate used excessive force that resulted in civilian deaths.• The new information obtained during the review did not materially impact the findings in the November 2021 Abbey Gate 15-6 investigation and the supplemental review team did not recommend any modifications to those findings.For additional information on the Abbey Gate supplemental review, please contact U.S. Central Command Public Affairs.

-30-
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.72 MB)
 
 Fuels Lab 379th Expeditionary Logistics Readiness Squadron ANG POL Air National Guard Al Udeid lab Pennsylvania
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### § 595.1 Scope.

This part establishes conditions under which the compliance of motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment with the Federal motor vehicle safety standards may be made inoperative.

[66 FR 12655, Feb. 27, 2001]
Editorial Note on Part 801
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 801 appear at 86 FR 54641, Oct. 4, 2021.

§ 801.2 Presumption of openness. ( a ) In implementing the FOIA, it is the policy of the NTSB to make information available to the public to the greatest extent possible, consistent with the mission of the NTSB. The NTSB will withhold records under the FOIA only when the NTSB reasonably foresees that disclosure would harm an interest protected by a FOIA exemption or is prohibited by law. Whenever the NTSB determines that full disclosure of a requested record is not possible, the NTSB will consider whether partial disclosure is possible and will take reasonable steps to segregate and release nonexempt material. Information the NTSB routinely provides to the public as part of a regular NTSB activity (such as press releases and information disclosed on the NTSB's public Website) may be provided to the public without compliance with this part.
( b ) The NTSB will release on its website a “public docket” containing documentation that the agency deemed pertinent to the investigation. Requesters may access these public dockets without submitting a FOIA request. The NTSB encourages all requesters to review the public docket materials before submitting a FOIA request.