alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Grafton,

June, 1899.

#### Carr *v.*Adams.

Bill in Equity, for the determination of confused and uncertain boundaries between the parties. At the May trial term, 1899, the defendant moved that the plaintiff be required, under the 26th rule of court, to file a deposition taken by him of a witness, not a party, residing in Massachusetts. The court granted the motion and ordered the deposition to be filed by June 10 of that year. The plaintiff excepted, and duly filed a bill of exceptions, upon the ground that the deposition was his private property and subject to his own exclusive use and custody until he elected to use it, and not subject to be ordered on file or put in custody of the court.

*Bingham,, Mitchell & Batchellor, Dearborn & Chase,*and *Brew, Jordan & Buckley,*for the plaintiff.

*Lewis W. Eling*and *Burleigh & Adams,*for the defendant.

Blodgett, C. J.

“ Upon motion to the court, the depositions which either party proposes to use on the trial are to be filed with *623the clerk; and, after suck motion is granted, no depositions are to be used except tliose which are thus filed.” Rules of Court, No. 26. “The court may from time to time establish rules and orders of practice, consistent with the laws, for conducting and regulating its business.” P. S., *c.*204, s. 5. The plaintiff lias pointed •out no inconsistency between the rule and the laws, and none exists.

But aside from the rule, the court had the power to make the order. “ Courts of justice have powers, as a necessary incident to their general jurisdiction, to make such orders in relation to the cases pending before them as are necessary to the progress of the cases and the dispatch of business.” *Deming*v. *Foster,*42 N. H. 165, 178. The theory of the law is “that the court may make such orders in each case, from time to time, as justice may require” *(11.*179); and whether justice required the making of the particular order complained of, was manifestly a question of fact for the exclusive determination of the presiding justice.

*Exceptions overruled.*

Chase, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
#### FEDERATED METALS CORPORATION, PROSECUTOR, v. FRED BOYKO, RESPONDENT.

Argued May 2, 1933

Decided August 29, 1933.

Before Justices Case, Bodine and Donges.

Bor the prosecutor, *Edwin Joseph O’Brien.*

Bor the respondent, *David RosJcein.*

Per Curiam.

The writ brings up a judgment reversing the workmen’s compensation bureau in dismissing a petition seeking compensation for increased disability. The original claim was filed July 18th, 1931. Claimant sought compensation for lead poisoning — an occupational disease. The order entered contains the following recital: “After considerable discussion between the parties it was finally agreed that the case should be compromised as a complete and final disposition of the same on the following basis.” After testimony was offered, a judgment was entered. Within a year, a new petition was filed for the purpose of reopening the case and granting an award for increased disability. The bureau held this petition should be dismissed and the Common Pleas held it should be considered. If there was a final adjudication on the merits and payment of the judgment, the action of the bureau was proper. *Herbert*v. *Newark Hardware Co.,*107 *N. J. L. 24 ;*151 *Atl. Rep.*502. On the other hand, *808if there was a mere agreement of compromise, approved by the burean, the action of the Common Pleas was proper. *Thomas*v. *Liondale Bleach, Dye and Print Works,*10 *N. J. Mis. R. 255; 159 Atl. Rep.*313; *affirmed,*110 *N. J. L.*27; 164 *Atl. Rep.*11; *Palm Construction Co.*v. *Bahr,*10 *N. J. Mis. R.*756; 160 *Atl. Rep,*886.

The case seems to us to be controlled by the case of *Herbert*v. *Newark Hardware Co., supra.*There was a hearing on the original claim. The petitioner took the stand, was sworn and examined before a deputy commissioner; medical testimony was offered; findings were made, and a rule for judgment entered. The proceedings took the same course as is usual when a judgment is entered in a court of record for damages in an action brought in behalf of a minor. To permit such a record to be disturbed, merely because of alleged newly discovered evidence, would tend to disturb the settled practice.

Section 11 of the Workmen’s Compensation Procedure act, as amended *(Pamph. L.*1921, *p.*731), in part provides: “The judgment of the said bureau shall be final and conclusive between the parties and shall bar any subsequent action or proceeding, unless reopened by the said bureau or appealed as hereinafter provided.”

The statutory provisions are all analyzed at length by Mr. Justice Parker in *Herbert*v. *Newark Hardware Co., supra.*It was there held: “That the payment of the previous judgment was not such a .‘last payment of compensation’ in the intendment of the statute, as would support an application to ‘review the award’ within a year after such payment of the judgment.

We think a judgment entered in a proceeding in the bureau after hearing is a final judgment, and a final disposition of the case even though the parties agree to the award as made.

The judgment below is reversed.
|Exhibit 32
|----------

COGENCO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 
Principal Executive Officer

To my knowledge: the annual report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2008, containing financial statements for the period then ended, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of 1934; and the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cogenco International, Inc. for the periods presented.



| | June 30, 2008
| | -------------



|/s/ David Brenman_______________David W. Brenman, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Chief Financial Officer
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

99) ll-E-59 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:06 AM Sheet 99 of 264 
EMSIG-HUDSDN 

US-'Ua/»7 17:02 

TEI_:l-51S-82S-0026 Feb 04,97 10:_b N0.UU4 r

1

 .U2 

©19199410234 , , PES RTP- NC (BOOi'DOiT 

P.2 

from: 

Date: 

Cvutact: 

Company: 

Contact Report 

Melanie Proctor, Pacific Environmental Services 

January 7,1997 

Mr. Timothy Haskins, Director of Regulate 

Emsig Manufacturing Corporation 

Telephone Number: (518) 828-7301 

Fax Number: (518) 828-0026 

Contact Summary: fl/oV «*n fa „ /*»A/P 

Mr. Haskins informed PES that a culculaliun/rrur was made in Enibig's emission 

calculations arid the informaiiuii provided in Uic Octefeet 6,1996 contact summary was incorrect. 

Based on infoiiuatioii Horn Mi. Haskins, Emsig currently emits approximately 13 tons of IIAP 

per year and is therefore considered to be a major source. 

According to Mr. Haskins, Emsig is planning to install an emission control device to 

reduce emissions to less than S tons of HAP per year. Faeilities that cap emissions by rule to less 

than 5 tons per year 3ie not required to obtain-a-T^itle' 

INFORMATION IS ACCURATE 

A-94-52
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.97 MB)
 
 USCENTCOM Tampa food CENTCOM Coalition International holiday cuisine
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
H. Res. 546

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 25, 2002.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R.

4691) to prohibit certain abortion-related discrimination in

governmental activities. The bill shall be considered as read

for amendment. The previous question shall be considered as

ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill equally divided

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member

of the Committee on Energy and Commerce; and (2) one motion to recommit.

Attest:

Clerk.
Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants


The Board of Directors
QVC, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 33-63223, 33-56903, 333-08577, 333-18715 and 333-69709) on Form S-8 and
(Nos. 333-54032 and 333-81391) on Form S-3 of Comcast Corporation of our report
dated February 3, 1999, with respect to the consolidated statements of
operations and comprehensive income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows of
QVC, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1998 (such
consolidated financial statements are not separately presented herein), which
report is included as an exhibit to the Form 10-K of Comcast Corporation for the
year ended December 31, 2000.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 28, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>   THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
           FROM THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE
           STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
           REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                      APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                 342,049
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                          684,788
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     8,117,226
<PP&E>                                 351,975
<DEPRECIATION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       8,117,226
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  987,547
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                            10,396,941
<OTHER-SE>                                   0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         8,117,226
<SALES>                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       233,462
<CGS>                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     1,388,817
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     607,583
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (1,762,938)
<INCOME-TAX>                             4,240
<NET-INCOME>                       (1,767,178)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (0.22)


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 251 (Thursday, December 31, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 81818]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-32971]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9024-7]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www2.epa.gov/nepa
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EISs)
Filed 12/21/2015 Through 12/24/2015
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-nepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20150363, Draft, USFS, MT, Center Horse Landscape Restoration 
Project, Comment Period Ends: 02/16/2016, Contact: Tami Paulsen 406-
329-3731.
EIS No. 20150364, Second Draft Supplemental, NRC, NY, Generic--License 
Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 38, Volume 5, Regarding Indian 
Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, Comment Period Ends: 03/04/
2016, Contact: Michael Wentzel 301-415-6459.
EIS No. 20150365, Final, USACE, CA, Panoche Valley Solar Project, 
Review Period Ends: 02/01/2016, Contact: Lisa Gibson 916-557-5288.
EIS No. 20150366, Draft, USFS, MT, Lower Yaak, O'Brien, Sheep Project, 
Comment Period Ends: 02/16/2016, Contact: Miles Friend 406-295-4693.
EIS No. 20150367, Draft, USACE, CA, Upper Llagas Creek Flood Project, 
Comment Period Ends: 02/16/2016, Contact: Jim Mazza 415-503-6775.

    Dated: December 28, 2015.
Dawn Roberts,
Management Analyst, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2015-32971 Filed 12-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 572

#### Editorial Notes:

1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 572.83 Head-neck.

The head-neck assembly shown in drawing 1049/A consists of parts specified as items 1 through 16 and in item 56.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     US-Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,366
<SECURITIES>                                   8284
<RECEIVABLES>                                  133
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,677
<PP&E>                                         1,551
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,072
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,392
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          151
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    487
<COMMON>                                       829
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,894)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,392
<SALES>                                        2,078
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,078
<CGS>                                          1,046
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,046
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (0)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0     
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,168)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,168)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0      
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,168)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        



</TABLE>
****
****Naval Doctrine Command****
January 24, 2011 

Filed Via Email at e-ORI@dol.gov

Office of Regulations and Interpretations 

Employee Benefits Security Administration 

Attn: Fiduciary Definition Hearing 

Room N-5655 

U.S. Department of Labor 

200 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20210 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

The American Benefits Council respectfully requests to testify at the hearing on the 

definition of fiduciary to be held on March 1, 2011 and, if necessary, March 2, 2011. 

The Council is a public policy organization representing principally Fortune 500 

companies and other organizations that assist employers of all sizes in providing 

benefits to employees. Collectively, the Council’s members either sponsor directly or 

provide services to retirement and health plans that cover more than 100 million 

Americans. 

In our testimony, which will be presented by Kent Mason, outside legal counsel for the 

Council and an attorney with the law firm of Davis & Harman, LLP, a Council member 

company, we plan to cover (1) individualized advice and Interpretive Bulletin 96-1, (2) 

the “may be considered” fiduciary threshold trigger, (3) plan sponsor employees and 

potential fiduciary liability, (4) the seller exception, (5) investment option platforms, (6) 

valuation, and (5) effective date issues.

The Council would appreciate this opportunity to testify and believe we can provide 

very useful input on fiduciary issues from the employer perspective. If you have any 

questions, please feel free to call me at 202-289-6700. 

 Sincerely, 

 

 Jan M. Jacobson 

 Senior Counsel, Retirement Policy 

 American Benefits Council
# Den Europæiske Unions C 151/8. j

| | ISSN 1725-2393 |
| --- | --- |
| Den Europæiske Unions
  Tidende | C 151 |
| | |
| Dansk udgave | Meddelelser og oplysninger | 47. årgang8. juni 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2393

Den Europæiske Unions

Tidende

C 151

Dansk udgave

Meddelelser og oplysninger

47. årgang8. juni 2004

---

| Informationsnummer | Indhold | Side |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Meddelelser |
| | Kommissionen |
| 2004/C 151/1 | Euroens vekselkurs | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Indhold

Side

I   Meddelelser

Kommissionen

2004/C 151/1

Euroens vekselkurs

1

| DA | |
| --- | --- |

DA

---

I Meddelelser

Kommissionen

| 8.6.2004 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | C 151/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2004

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

C 151/1

---

Euroens vekselkurs (1)

7. juni 2004

(2004/C 151/01)

1 euro=

| | Valuta | Kurs |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | amerikanske dollar | 1,2319 |
| JPY | japanske yen | 135,36 |
| DKK | danske kroner | 7,4335 |
| GBP | pund sterling | 0,67025 |
| SEK | svenske kroner | 9,1333 |
| CHF | schweiziske franc | 1,5242 |
| ISK | islandske kroner | 87,33 |
| NOK | norske kroner | 8,1860 |
| BGN | bulgarske lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | cypriotiske pund | 0,58300 |
| CZK | tjekkiske koruna | 31,270 |
| EEK | estiske kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | ungarske forint | 251,75 |
| LTL | litauiske litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | lettiske lats | 0,6638 |
| MTL | maltesiske lira | 0,4266 |
| PLN | polske zloty | 4,6492 |
| ROL | rumænske leu | 40 803 |
| SIT | slovenske tolar | 239,1400 |
| SKK | slovakiske koruna | 39,950 |
| TRL | tyrkiske lira | 1 816 967 |
| AUD | australske dollar | 1,7521 |
| CAD | canadiske dollar | 1,6592 |
| HKD | hongkongske dollar | 9,6024 |
| NZD | newzealandske dollar | 1,9569 |
| SGD | singaporeanske dollar | 2,0996 |
| KRW | sydkoreanske won | 1 427,96 |
| ZAR | sydafrikanske rand | 7,9842 |

Valuta

Kurs

USD

amerikanske dollar

1,2319

JPY

japanske yen

135,36

DKK

danske kroner

7,4335

GBP

pund sterling

0,67025

SEK

svenske kroner

9,1333

CHF

schweiziske franc

1,5242

ISK

islandske kroner

87,33

NOK

norske kroner

8,1860

BGN

bulgarske lev

1,9558

CYP

cypriotiske pund

0,58300

CZK

tjekkiske koruna

31,270

EEK

estiske kroon

15,6466

HUF

ungarske forint

251,75

LTL

litauiske litas

3,4528

LVL

lettiske lats

0,6638

MTL

maltesiske lira

0,4266

PLN

polske zloty

4,6492

ROL

rumænske leu

40 803

SIT

slovenske tolar

239,1400

SKK

slovakiske koruna

39,950

TRL

tyrkiske lira

1 816 967

AUD

australske dollar

1,7521

CAD

canadiske dollar

1,6592

HKD

hongkongske dollar

9,6024

NZD

newzealandske dollar

1,9569

SGD

singaporeanske dollar

2,0996

KRW

sydkoreanske won

1 427,96

ZAR

sydafrikanske rand

7,9842

---

(1)

Kilde: Referencekurs offentliggjort af Den Europæiske Centralbank.

---