alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                            1762
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        8
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1770
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               88
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1682
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1770
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    44
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    84
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (40)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (40)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (40)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.53)


</TABLE>
From: Jeanette Hoffman [mailto:jeanette@adorallc.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 1:47 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32 

Dear Mr. President Barack Obama and Labor Secretary Thomas Perez,

This is in regards to the Labor Dept. considering a proposal to bar investors from 

using options in IRA accounts.

As an options investor, I ask you to please amend the proposal so it does NOT 

prevent investors such as me from 

using options, specifically the options that protect ones investments ( such as) 

covered calls and protective puts. 

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Jeanette M Hoffman
-----Original Message----- 

From: p mccormack [mailto:pmpariggi@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 5:26 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Rin 1210-AB33 

In item 13 of your request for comments concerning whether regulations 

are needed with respect to annuity products in 401k and IRAs: any 

requirements to buy annuities are inappropriate and unacceptable for 

the following reasons: 1 annuities are a ripoff giuen their low rate of 

return and their excessively high cost structure. 2 individuals know 

best how they want to invest their moneys and 3 government has no 

business dictating what people do with their money. If you do meddle 

with or dictate investments in our plans how will you prevent the 

government from taking ouer peoples' plans and keep the government from 

competing with the private sector and keep the govt from favoring one 

annuity provider over another? In short keep your disgusting govt paws 

off our money. Roscoe Costa.
# March 28: Military airstrikes continue against ISIS terrorists in Syria and Iraq 

/ Published March 28, 2017
**SOUTHWEST ASIA —**
-------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of 1 

AU''. 2­ LEGAL. ,l- ~ .. 

PUBLJCA':,gfflsING DIVISION 

BRAN~tGULATIONS As of: August 25, 2010 

Received: August 10, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 25, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2d6a2 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, :2010 

Submission Tvpe: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 


Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 


Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 


Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001 


Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 


a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 


Document: IRS-2010-001O-0400 


Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 


Submitter Information 

Name: Katie Elizabeth Sleigh 


Address: 


3285 N Arlington Heights Rd STe 206 

Arlington Heights, IL, 60004 


Email: katiesleigh927@gmail.com 


Phone: 847-788-0880 


Fax: 847-788-0887 


Organization: Sleigh Family Chiropractic 


General Comment 

See attached file(s) 

Attachments 

IRS-2010-0010-0400.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

https:llfdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency 1 componentlsubmitter InfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/25/2010 
August 9,2010 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCII0-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating 

to Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable 

Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally 

comment on the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" 

statusHYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov/searchiRegs/home.html'' \1 

"documentDetail?R=0900006480b03a71" \t "new" (DeeWiliRt ID IRg dQIQ QQI9 99().1.1. 

I believe the consumer protections included as part ofthe new health care law are vitalily 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every 

effort should be made to increase the number ofindividuals covered by the Patient 

Protection and Affordable Care Act (PP ACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or 

conditions that would extend these protections to consumers under currently existing 

"grandfathered" plans should not be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically 

support the position and detailed comments offered by the American Chiropractic 

Association with respect to the implementation of these regulations. 

Dr. Katie Sleigh
Cheshire,

Dec., 1894.

#### State *v.*Hitchcock.

Upon the trial of an indictment against a person claiming to be a registered pharmacist for illegally keeping spirituous liquor for sale, the offer in . evidence of hand-bills used in advertising certain medicines was properly rejected, in the absence of evidence or the offer of any evidence that liquor was used in compounding them.

Indictment, for illegally keeping spirituous liquor for sale. Trial by jury. Verdict of guilty. The defendant introduced evidence tending to show that he was a registered pharmacist at the time and place it was alleged the offence was committed. He also offered in evidence five hand-bills of different kinds, as samples of those distributed by him for the purpose of advertís*245ing certain remedies. He offered no evidence that he had used spirituous liquors in compounding medicines, nor what the constituent properties of the medicines named in the hand-bills were. The evidence was rejected, and the defendant excepted.

*Charles M. Mersey,*solicitor, for the state.

*Joseph Madden,*for the defendant.

Wallace, J.

The question at issue was whether the defendant kept spirituous liquor for sale illegally. On that question it was proper for him to show that the liquor he was charged with keeping for sale was kept by him as a pharmacist in compounding medicines. But his offer to introduce in evidence hand-bills, as samples of those distributed by him in advertising certain medicines, was properly rejected, in the absence of any evidence or the offer of any evidence to show that liquor was used in compounding those medicines.

*jExceptions overruled.*

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
# U.S. General James Mattis visits United Arab Emirates

/ Published Sept. 23, 2011

TAMPA , Fla. (September 23, 2011) — Gen. James Mattis, commander of US Central Command, visited the United Arab Emirates to gain the perspective of  LTG Hamad Muhammad Thani Al-Rumaythi, the Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces, on regional security issues yesterday.
Mattis said he appreciated the country’s support of the international effort in Libya and thanked him for the U.A.E.’s leadership.
Mattis also met with Michael Corbin, the U.S. Ambassador to U.A.E., and his staff.  “U.A.E. remains a leading light in the region and I value the insight I gain every time I visit,” said Mattis.

 The visit to U.A.E. is part of a multi-country visit Mattis is making to the region to increase his understanding of issues.
PUBLIC LAW 107–180—MAY 20, 2002 116 STAT. 581

Public Law 107–180

107th Congress

An Act

To authorize certain Federal officials with responsibility for the administration

of the criminal justice system of the District of Columbia to serve on and participate

in the activities of the District of Columbia Criminal Justice Coordinating Council,

and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Criminal Justice Coordinating

Council Restructuring Act of 2002’’.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZING FEDERAL OFFICIALS ADMINISTERING CRIMINAL

JUSTICE SYSTEM OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TO

PARTICIPATE IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING

COUNCIL.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Each of the individuals described in subsection (b) is authorized to serve on the District of Columbia

Criminal Justice Coordinating Council, participate in the Council’s

activities, and take such other actions as may be necessary to

carry out the individual’s duties as a member of the Council.

(b) INDIVIDUALS DESCRIBED.—The individuals described in this

subsection are as follows:

(1) The Director of the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia.

(2) The Director of the District of Columbia Pretrial Services Agency.

(3) The United States Attorney for the District of Columbia.

(4) The Director of the Bureau of Prisons.

(5) The chair of the United States Parole Commission.

(6) The Director of the United States Marshals Service.

SEC. 3. ANNUAL REPORTING REQUIREMENT FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE

COORDINATING COUNCIL.

Not later than 60 days after the end of each calendar year,

the District of Columbia Criminal Justice Coordinating Council

shall prepare and submit to the President, Congress, and each

of the entities of the District of Columbia government and Federal

Government whose representatives serve on the Council a report

describing the activities carried out by the Council during the

year.

SEC. 4. FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION FOR COORDINATING COUNCIL.

There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2002

and each succeeding fiscal year such sums as may be necessary

for a Federal contribution to the District of Columbia to cover

Appropriation

authorization.

Deadline.

Criminal Justice

Coordinating

Council

Restructuring

Act of 2002.

May 20, 2002

[H.R. 2305]

116 STAT. 582 PUBLIC LAW 107–180—MAY 20, 2002

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2305:

SENATE REPORTS: No. 107–145 (Comm. on Governmental Affairs).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 147 (2001): Dec. 4, considered and passed House.

Vol. 148 (2002): May 7, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

the costs incurred by the District of Columbia Criminal Justice

Coordinating Council.

SEC. 5. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING

COUNCIL DEFINED.

In this Act, the ‘‘District of Columbia Criminal Justice Coordinating Council’’ means the entity established by the Council of

the District of Columbia under the Criminal Justice Coordinating

Council for the District of Columbia Establishment Act of 2001.

Approved May 20, 2002.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hamptons Luxury Homes, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank Dalene, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Frank Dalene



Frank Dalene

Chief Financial Officer

September 12, 2005
---------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of 1 

0<6G-- )J ytf /2 -10 

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 


PUBLICATION .. REGULATIONS 


BRANCH 


PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION 

As of: August 25, 2010 

Received: August 10, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 25, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2dOf7 

Comments Due: August 16, 2010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0367 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: Stephen J Ingley 

Address: 

50 Carroll Creek Way, Suite 260 

Frederick, MD, 21701 

Email: singley@alea.org 

Phone: 301-631-2406 

Fax: 301-631-2466 

Organization: Airborne Law Enforcement Association 

General Comment 

The Airborne Law Enforcement Association (ALEA), a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation with 3.5 

FTEs, joins the American Society of Association Executives (ASAE) in their comments, concerns 

and recommendations regarding Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim 

Final Rules for Relating to Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act. 

https:llfdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency Icomponentl submitter InfoCover Page ?Call=... 8/25/2010
§ 91.5 Findings and recommendations. ( a ) Upon finding that a foreign government or entity imposes excessive or otherwise discriminatory charges against U.S. flag air carriers or causes such carriers to be subjected to discriminatory or unfair competitive practices, the Assistant Secretary, in coordination with the General Counsel and the Administrator, shall determine the extent of the discrimination or unfair competitive practices.
( b ) Where the matter involves excessive or otherwise discriminatory charges, the Assistant Secretary shall prepare a report and recommend that the Secretary promptly submit a report of the case to the Secretary of State and the Civil Aeronautics Board in accordance with section 11 of the International Aviation Facilities Act, 49 U.S.C. 1159a.
( c ) Where the matter involves discrimination or unfair competitive practices other than user charges, the Assistant Secretary shall prepare a report and recommend that the Secretary take such other action within the jurisdiction of the Department as is appropriate under the circumstances in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 1159b.
( d ) If the Secretary determines, after review of the report and recommendations made under paragraph (b) of this section, that unreasonably excessive or otherwise discriminatory charges exist, the Secretary will submit a report on the matter to the Secretary of State and the Chairman of the Civil Aeronautics Board in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 1159a.
( e ) If the Secretary determines, after review of the report and recommendations made under paragraph (c) of this section, that discriminatory or unfair competitive practices exist, the Secretary will commence all appropriate action within his jurisdiction in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 1159b.
#### § 41.105 Definitions.

As used in this part—

*Operating Administration* includes the Office of the Secretary.

*DOT* means the U.S. Department of Transportation.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 587 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 232
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 587

                          [Report No. 107-757]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

             October 16 (legislative day, October 15), 2002

   Mr. Sessions, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of Wednesday, October 16, 
2002, providing for consideration or disposition of any of the 
following measures:
            (1) A joint resolution making further continuing 
        appropriations for the fiscal year 2003.
            (2) Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 5063) to amend the 
        Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a special rule for 
        members of the uniformed services in determining the exclusion 
        of gain from the sale of principal residence and to restore the 
        tax exempt status of death gratuity payments to members of the 
        uniformed services.

                                                 House Calendar No. 232

107th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 587

                          [Report No. 107-757]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

             October 16 (legislative day, October 15), 2002

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
<Page>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.31

                    ASSIGNMENT OF REAL ESTATE SALE AGREEMENT

         For good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, Goodman Financial Services, Inc., a Washington corporation
("Assignor"), hereby assigns, transfers and sets over to BC-GFS LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company ("Assignee"), all of Assignor's right, title and
interest in, to and under that certain Real Estate Sale Agreement dated July 11,
2002, as amended by that certain Reinstatement and First Amendment dated October
_____, 2002 (collectively, the "Agreement"), between ERP Operating Limited
Partnership, an Illinois limited partnership, EQR-Alderwood Limited Partnership,
a Washington limited partnership, and EQR-Wellington, L.L.C., a Delaware limited
liability company as Sellers, and Assignor as Purchaser.

         DATED this __________ day of December, 2002.

         ASSIGNOR:                    Goodman Financial Services, Inc.,
                                      a Washington corporation


                                      By:
                                         ----------------------------------
                                               John A. Goodman, President

         ASSIGNEE:                    BC-GFS LLC,
                                      a Delaware limited liability company

                                      By:  GFS Equity Management LLC, a
                                           Washington limited liability company,
                                           its manager


                                           By:
                                              ----------------------------
                                                     John A. Goodman, Manager
-------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of 1 

~EG-I Jr111--JO AUG 2 0 '-u;u 

LEGAL PROCESSING. DIVISION 


PUBLICATION&, REGULATIONS As of: August 20, 2010 BRANCH Received: August 09, 2010 PUBLIC Status: Posted

Posted: Al1gust 20, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2c639 SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathe oed 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0186 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: Janet Geffner 

Address: 

6423 Cavalier Corridor 

Falls Church, VA, 22044 

Email: jgeffner@asdcorp.com 

Phone: 703-256-9033 

General Comment 

See attached file(s) 

Attachments 

IRS-2010-0010-0186.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

https:/ Ifdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency/componentisubmitterInfoCoverPage?Cal1= ... 8/20/2010 
August 9.2010 

Office ofConsumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-201 0­

0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effo:rt 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these 

regulations. 

Janet Geffner 

6423 Cavalier Corridor 

Falls Church, V A 22044
#### James A. McKinley, Appellant, *v.*Susan Hessen, Respondent.

(Submitted May 29, 1911;

decided June 6, 1911.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 202 N. Y. 21.)