alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-14-0028

SAT Date: 11/22/2013

Print Date: 3/4/2014

Related cases:

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2-3 2

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

2 12

Exposure Based Review:

Health: Yes

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: IRR/CORROSION-E, S, MM; DEVEL; ACUTE; AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-14-0028

FATE: Estimations for typical 

Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

log Kow = 1.88 (E) 

S = 10.3 g/L at 25 C (E)

VP = 2.5E-4 torr at 25 C (E)

BP = 338 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

log Koc = 2.49 (E)

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 3
log Fish BCF = 0.91 (E)

log Fish BAF = 0.94 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 0-90 

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = low - moderate

PBT Potential: P2B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow – moderate

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is moderate through the skin and the GI tract 

and good through the lungs based on physical/chemical properties. The previous PMN 

submission, went through a Standard Review. High acute oral toxicity was reported. 

The Standard Review supported concerns for irritation and developmental toxicity. The 

Standard Review concluded that no conclusions could be drawn with respect to mutagenicity. 

The analogs used to support the concern for developmental toxicity are 

which were 

positive when tested in hamsters. 

have been shown to be developmentally toxic by inhibiting the enzyme lysyl oxidase which 

initiates cross linking of collagen and elastin fibers. was corrosive to the skin and 

eyes. Moderate concern.

 Test Data: Submitted with : acute oral LD50 = 2.6 mg/kg; 

severe dermal necrosis; severe eye irritation; (-) ames assay.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 51

daphnid 48-h LC50 6

green algal 96-h EC50 5.1

fish _ chronic value 3.1

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.49

algal _ chronic 

value

1.7

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for ; SAR 

chemical class = MW 223; log Kow = 1.88 (EPI); liquid with unknown mp (P); 

S = 10.3 g/L (M); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean 

measured concentrations; hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3 and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 3
Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

49

SARs

SAR Class

Ecotox Category 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Kendra Moran

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 11
                                                                      ----------

          STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)
                        DECEMBER 31, 2001, 2000 AND 1999



<TABLE><CAPTION>
                                                                               2001              2000              1999
                                                                           ------------      ------------      ------------
<S>                                                                        <C>               <C>               <C>
NET EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE - (BASIC)

Net earnings (loss)                                                        $ (2,162,992)     $   (800,270)     $  5,366,695
                                                                           ============      ============      ============

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                          6,690,933         6,628,667         6,492,224
                                                                           ============      ============      ============

Net earnings (loss) per common share                                       $      (0.32)     $      (0.12)     $       0.83
                                                                           ============      ============      ============


NET EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE - (DILUTED)

Net earnings (loss)                                                        $ (2,162,992)     $   (800,270)     $  5,366,695
                                                                           ============      ============      ============

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                          6,690,933         6,628,667         6,492,224

Add net additional common shares upon exercise of common stock options               --                --            57,202
                                                                           ------------      ------------      ------------

Adjusted average common shares outstanding                                    6,690,933         6,628,667         4,549,426
                                                                           ============      ============      ============

Net earnings (loss) per common share                                       $      (0.32)     $      (0.12)     $       0.82
                                                                           ============      ============      ============
</TABLE>
Docket: EBSA-2010-0007 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in 

Retirement Plans 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0007-0001 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options 

Document: EBSA-2010-0007-DRAFT-0020 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: Nancy Dummer 

Address: 

525 W Van Buren 16th Fl 

Chicago, IL, 60607 

Email: Nancy.Dummer@AkzoNobel.com 

Phone: 312-544-7051 

Organization: Akzo Nobel Inc. 

General Comment 

Having been involved in the management of fairly large retirement plans over the last 30 years, I 

have worked with plans that offer only annuities and those that offer a lump sum. My experience 

is that when offered a choice between a lump sum and an annuity, 99.9% of the participants 

choose the lump sum. 

My concern with offering a lump sum option within the 401(k) is the ability to transfer the asset 

in divestitures and terminations. In offering the annuity as a option for distribution outside of the 

Plan (by offering a annuity platform) the plan would be going to considerable work to select 

annuity providers for an extremely small segment of the population that would not allow us to get 

any better rates than the individual could obtain on their own in the option market. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: February 17, 2010 

Received: February 04, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80a8c09c 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 2/17/2010
###   This page is framed, please go here:

In the header we've provided links for government sites either related to the Technology Administration or with relevant information.  This is also the frame with our SEARCH tool.

The MAIN navigation frame has two columns of links for navigating the content pages.  Major topics are in the left column and subtopics in the right column.

Content  At the bottom of the page you'll also find links for contacting us.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                       EXIBIT 21


                  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COLUMBIA GAS SYSTEM, INC.
                             as of December 31, 1996


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                              State of
        Segment / Subsidiary                                Incorporation
-----------------------------------------                   -------------

<S>                                                           <C>
Transmission and Staorage Operations
------------------------------------
    Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation                     Delaware
    Columbia Gulf Transmission Company                        Delaware
    Columbia LNG Corporation                                  Delaware


Distribution Operations
-----------------------
    Columbia Gas of Kentucky, Inc.                            Kentucky
    Columbia Gas of Maryland, Inc.                            Delaware
    Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.                                Ohio
    Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania, Inc.                        Pennsylvania
    Commonwealth Gas Services, Inc.                           Virginia


Exploration and Production Operations
-------------------------------------
    Columbia Natural Resources, Inc.                          Texas


Marketing, Propane and Power Generation
---------------------------------------
    Columbia Atlantic Trading Corporation                     Delaware
    Columbia Network Services Corporation                     Delaware
    Columbia Energy Services Corporation                      Kentucky
    Columbia Propane Corporation                              Delaware
    Commonwealth Propane, Inc.                                Virginia
    TriStar Ventures Corporation                              Delaware
    TriStar Capital Corporation                               Delaware


Corporate
---------
    Columbia Gas System Service Corporation                   Delaware
    Columbia Insurance Corporation, LTD                       Delaware
</TABLE>
6560-50-P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 50

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-1145]

RIN: 2060-AO72

Secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Oxides of Nitrogen and Sulfur

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: This proposed rule is being issued as required by a consent decree governing the 

schedule for completion of this review of the air quality criteria and the secondary national 

ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for oxides of nitrogen and oxides of sulfur. Based on its 

review, EPA proposes to retain the current nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) 

secondary standards to provide requisite protection for the direct effects on vegetation resulting 

from exposure to gaseous oxides of nitrogen and sulfur in the ambient air. Additionally, with 

regard to protection from the deposition of oxides of nitrogen and sulfur to sensitive aquatic and 

terrestrial ecosystems, including acidification and nutrient enrichment effects, EPA is proposing 

to add secondary standards identical to the NO2 and SO2 primary 1-hour standards and not set a 

new multi-pollutant secondary standard in this review. The proposed 1-hour secondary NO2

standard would be set at a level of 100 ppb and the proposed 1-hour secondary SO2 standard 

would be set at 75 ppb. In addition, EPA has decided to undertake a field pilot program to gather 

and analyze additional relevant data so as to enhance the Agency’s understanding of the degree 

of protectiveness that a new multi-pollutant approach, defined in terms of an aquatic acidification 
index (AAI), would afford and to support development of an appropriate monitoring network for 

such a standard. The EPA solicits comment on the framework of such a standard and on the 

design of the field pilot program. The EPA will sign a notice of final rulemaking for this review 

no later than March 20, 2012.

DATES: Written comments on this proposed rule must be received by [INSERT DATE 60 

DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].

Public Hearings: The EPA intends to hold a public hearing around the end of August to 

early September and will announce in a separate Federal Register notice the date, time, and 

address of the public hearing on this proposed rule.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-

1145, by one of the following methods:

 www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.

 Email: a-and-r-Docket@epa.gov.

 Fax: 202-566-1741.

 Mail: Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-1145, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail 

code 6102T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20460. Please include a 

total of two copies.

Hand Delivery: Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-1145, Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 

West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. Such
U.S. Conducts Defensive Precision Strike
 By Attributable to Pentagon Press Secretary John Kirby
  “At President Biden’s direction, U.S. military forces earlier this evening conducted airstrikes against infrastructure utilized by Iranian-backed militant groups in eastern Syria. These strikes were authorized in response to recent attacks against American and Coalition personnel in Iraq, and to ongoing threats to those personnel. Specifically, the strikes destroyed multiple facilities located at a border control point used by a number of Iranian-backed militant groups, including Kait’ib Hezbollah (KH) and Kait’ib Sayyid al-Shuhada (KSS). This proportionate military response was conducted together with diplomatic measures, including consultation with Coalition partners. The operation sends an unambiguous message: President Biden will act to protect American and Coalition personnel. At the same time, we have acted in a deliberate manner that aims to de-escalate the overall situation in both eastern Syria and Iraq.”
Pearson
PUBLI
- BRANCH.

Page | of I

AECHENLMO SEP 0 2 2019

[As of: August 31, 2010

PUBLIC status Posted

Posted: August 31, 2010

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0526
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Aaron J Hokanson
Address: AK

General Comment

Thank you for your time reading the attached letter.

Attachments

IRS-2010-0010-0526.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=...

8/31/2010


August 11, 2010

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to
Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a consumer, a Doctor of Chiropractic, I wish to take this
opportunity to formally comment on the interim final rule regarding health plans and
“grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

Respectfully,

Aaron J Hokanson, D.C.
- page 1
- page 2
- page 3
- page 4
- page 5
- page 6
- page 7
- page 8
- page 9
- page 10
Page 1 of 1

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION fA EA LISAl ao -10 AUG 1 2 2010

TION & REG
PUBLICA! BRANCH

ULATIONS
6

As of: August 12, 2010

PUBLIC Status: Posted

Posted: August 12, 2010

SUBMISSION Comments Due: Augist 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Heaith Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0066
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Robert D Curtis
Address:
Austin, TX,
Organization: Curtis Chiropractic
Government Agency Type: Federal

General Comment

See attached file(s)

Attachments

IRS-2010-0010-0066.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/12/2010


Monday, August 09, 2010

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to
Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

Robert D Curtis, DC
Exhibit 23.2





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-22223, 333-128611 and 333-143517) of the report of Caturano and Company, P.C. (whose name has since changed to Caturano and Company, Inc.) dated March 31, 2010 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Spire Corporation as of December 31, 2009 and the year then ended, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K.








/s/ Caturano and Company, Inc.





Boston, Massachusetts


March 15, 2011
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 206 (Friday, October 24, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 63539]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25390]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 98

Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting

CFR Correction

    In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 96 to 99, 
revised as of July 1, 2013, on page 765, in Sec.  98.226, paragraph (c) 
is reinstated to read as follows:

Sec.  98.226  Data reporting requirements.

* * * * *
    (c) Annual nitric acid production from each nitric acid train 
(tons, 100 percent acid basis).
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-25390 Filed 10-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
Fw: Interagency comments on Implementation , Preamble Sections V and VI Lydia Wegman to: Tricia Crabtree 06/02/2010 06:50 PM

Lydia Wegman
----- Original Message ----- **From:** Lydia Wegman **Sent:** 05/27/2010 06:36 PM EDT **To:** "Laity, James A." <James_A._Laity@omb.eop.gov> **Cc:** Bridgid Curry; Charlotte Bertrand **Subject:** Re: Interagency comments on Implementation, Preamble Sections V and VI Thanks Jim. I hope you got my responses to your earlier comments. I hope you have a good weekend too. .
"Laity, James A." 05/27/2010 06:31:10 PM Lydia, FYI, there may be some addtl interagency...

From: "Laity, James A." <James

_ A.

_ Laity@omb.eop.gov> To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Bridgid Curry/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 05/27/2010 06:31 PM Subject: Interagency comments on Implementation, Preamble Sections V and VI

Lydia, FYI, there may be some addtl interagency comments on the preamble discussion regarding the level of the standard coming tomorrow. Have a good Memorial Day weekend. ‐‐ j im[attachment "SO2

_ NAAQS

_ Final

_ Rule

_ Sections V and VI w suggested edits.docx" deleted by Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US]
-----Original Message----- 

From: George Craig [mailto:george.craig@comcast.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 5:42 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 

Dear Sirs: 

My wife (66) and I (68) are both retired scientists. We could easily 

live another 25 years. Knowing this we each chose an immediate annuity 

with each other as beneficiaries as a part of our retirement portfolio. 

The rest of our money is in rolled-over IRAs invested in mutual funds. 

We thought this mix allows us to move ahead with our lives knowing that 

we get a lifetime income from the annuities and must try to protect 

ourselves from inflation with our fund investements. 

Then your "RFI Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and 

Beneficiaries in Retirement Plans" was recently brought to our 

attention. And we are concerned about what it implies. 

According to the Summary: "the Agencies could or should enhance, by 

regulation or otherwise, the retirement security of participants in 

employer sponsored retirement plans and in IRAs." 

The part about "by regulation or otherwise" appears at least twice in 

your RFI (pp. 5253 & 5255) and suggests you could be planning to mug 

our IRAs. Can you elaborate and please put our minds at ease, or is 

that not possible? 

 

Sincerely, 

Drs. Craig
#### § 71.12 Hawaii-Aleutian zone.

The seventh zone, the Hawaii-Aleutian standard time zone, includes the entire State of Hawaii and, in the State of Alaska, that part of the Aleutian Islands that is west of 169 degrees 30 minutes west longitude.

(Act of March 19, 1918, as amended by the Uniform Time Act of 1966 and Pub. L. 97-449, 15 U.S.C. 260-264; 49 CFR 1.59(a)).

[Amdt. 71-19, 48 FR 43281, Sept. 22, 1983, as amended by Amdt. 71-20, 48 FR 55289, Dec. 12, 1983]
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.89 MB)
 
 COALITION cjtf isis SOJTF SOJTF-I Syria
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil