alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (12.5 MB)
 
 Bold Tigers Air Expeditionary Wing familiy 32 391st FS AF F-15 Strike Eagle Air Force Fighter Squadron deployed 332AEW
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
EXHIBIT 23





                          Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
CT Communications, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-59641, 33-59643, 33-59645, 333-15537, 333-30125, and
333-38895) of CT Communications, Inc. of our report dated March 5, 1999,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of CT Communications, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, and related schedule,
which report is incorporated by reference in the December 31, 1998 Annual Report
on Form 10-K of CT Communications, Inc.




                                                               /s/ KPMG LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina                                       KPMG LLP
March 5, 1999
Exhibit 32.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Hampton's Luxury Homes, Inc..
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Frank Dalene, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
         of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Frank Dalene
Frank Dalene
Chief Financial Officer
June 9, 2005
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 410

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding human rights

violations in Tibet, the Panchen Lama, and the need for dialogue between

the Chinese leadership and the Dalai Lama or his representatives.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 2, 2002

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. WOLF, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, and

Mr. KING) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on International Relations

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding human rights violations in Tibet, the Panchen Lama,

and the need for dialogue between the Chinese leadership

and the Dalai Lama or his representatives.

Whereas Hu Jintao, Vice President of the People’s Republic

of China and former Party Secretary of the Tibet Autonomous Region, visited the United States in April and

May of 2002;

Whereas Gedhun Choekyi Nyima was taken from his home by

Chinese authorities on May 17, 1995, at the age of 6,

shortly after being recognized as the 11th incarnation of

the Panchen Lama by the Dalai Lama;
2

•HRES 410 IH

Whereas the forced disappearance of the Panchen Lama violates fundamental freedoms enshrined in international

human rights covenants to which the People’s Republic

of China is a party;

Whereas the use of religious belief as the primary criteria for

repression against Tibetans reflects a continuing pattern

of grave human rights violations that have occurred since

the invasion of Tibet in 1949–50;

Whereas the State Department Country Reports on Human

Rights Practices for 2001 states that repressive social

and political controls continue to limit the fundamental

freedoms of Tibetans and risk undermining Tibet’s

unique cultural, religious, and linguistic heritage, and

that repeated requests for access to the Panchen Lama

to confirm his well-being and whereabouts have been denied; and

Whereas the Government of the People’s Republic of China

has failed to respond positively to efforts by the Dalai

Lama to enter into dialogue based on his proposal for

genuine autonomy within the People’s Republic of China

with a view to safeguarding the distinct identity of Tibet

and protecting the human rights of the Tibetan people:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that—

3 (1) Vice President Hu Jintao should be made

4 aware of congressional concern for the Panchen

5 Lama and the need to resolve the situation in Tibet

6 through dialogue with the Dalai Lama or his rep7 resentatives; and
3

•HRES 410 IH

1 (2) the Government of the People’s Republic of

2 China should—

3 (A) release the Panchen Lama and allow

4 him to pursue his traditional role at Tashi

5 Lhunpo monastery in Tibet; and

6 (B) enter into dialogue with the Dalai

7 Lama or his representatives in order to find a

8 negotiated solution for genuine autonomy that

9 respects the rights of all Tibetans.

Æ
----------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of 1

'K 6G-- JJ Y 4 /1- -/() 

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 


PUBLICATION It REGULATIONS 


BRANCH 
 As of: August 20, 2010 

Received: August 09, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 20, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2c6ce 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010 

Submission Tvpe: Web 

Docket: IRS-20lO-0010 

Group Health Plans and Hearth Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-00lO-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Statwi as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-20lO-0010-0252 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: Blake Edward Kalkstein 

Address: 

Towson, MD, 

General Comment 

See attached file(s) 

Attachments 

IRS-2010-0010-0252.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

https:/Ifdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency IcomponentisubmitterInfoCoverPage?Call= .. , 8/20/2010 
9 August 2010 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally commen.t on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-2010­

0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly. every eff01t 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these 

regulations. 

Blake Kalkstein
#### JOHN POST, PROSECUTOR, v. JAMES S. ANDERSON, MAYOR AND DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD, AND THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD, RESPONDENTS.

Argued October term, 1932

Decided December 19, 1932.

Before Justices Pabkee and Lloyd.

For the prosecutor, *J eróme J. Dunn.*

For the respondents, *Thomas L. Zimmerman, Jr.*

Pee Cueiam.

The application in this case is for a writ of *certiorari*to review the conviction of John Post, a member of the Ridge-wood village police force, of conduct unbecoming an officer *2in violation of a rule of the police manual, in that he had intercourse with a person named, causing her to become pregnant.

The first point made is that Anderson, director of public safety of the village of Eidgewood, was not qualified under the law as the tribunal to try him, inasmuch as the rules contemplate trial by all of the commissioners.

The difficulty with this contention is that chapter 275 of the laws of 1915, page 495 (which amends the statute popularly known as the Walsh act) has been construed by this court and the Court of Errors and Appeals to the contrary. In *Foley*v. *Orange,*91 *N. J. L.*555, it was declared that section 4 of the act takes from the board of commissioners jurisdiction to try charges against a police officer and vests such jurisdiction in the commissioner of the department of public safety; that the statute was imperative and self-executing. This decision has been followed on repeated occasions. *Hand*v. *Wildwood,*8 *N. J. Mis. R.*498; 150 *Atl. Rep.*828; *Mee*v. *Montclair,*9 *N. J. Mis. R.*46; 157 *Atl. Rep.*447. Rules of the commissioners to the contrary were, therefore, unavailing.

It is next urged that evidence received tending to establish the guilt of the officer was improperly received. This evidence consisted of the dying declaration of a girl to the effect that the prosecutor was responsible for her pregnant condition. This evidence was clearly inadmissible. 22 *Corp. Jur.*258, but this does not justify setting aside the order of dismissal inasmuch as other evidence heard by the director was amply sufficient, as we think, to establish the guilt of the prosecutor. *Crane*v. *Jersey City,*90 *N. J. L.*109; 103 *Atl. Rep.*678, where it was said that “the admission of illegal testimony in cases tried by a special tribunal * **** would not have the effect to invalidate the findings of that tribunal so, long as it appears that there is competent testimony in the case to support such findings.”

The application is denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,131
<SECURITIES>                                    84,502
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,072
<ALLOWANCES>                                       936
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,741
<PP&E>                                         310,787
<DEPRECIATION>                                  94,490
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 634,833
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,966
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,698
<OTHER-SE>                                     235,275
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   634,833
<SALES>                                        154,583
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               170,617
<CGS>                                           62,796
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,796
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                54,605
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   785
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,524
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,907
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,767
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,140
<DISCONTINUED>                                (15,377)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,763
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .79


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-31128

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

JEROME GAMBINO,

 Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(92-CR-368-E) 

_________________________________________________________________

June 24, 1996

Before KING, JOLLY, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jerome Gambino appeals from the district court’s denial of

his motion for return of property pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P.

41(e). He argues that he was twice put in jeopardy for the same

offense. We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the

parties and find no error in the decision of the district court. 

United States v. Gambino, No. 92-CR-368 E (E.D. La. Oct. 12,
2

1995). Further, the district court did not abuse its discretion

in denying Gambino’s motion without conducting an evidentiary

hearing. See Dickens v. Lewis, 750 F.2d 1251, 1255 (5th Cir.

1984). Accordingly, the district court’s order denying Gambino’s

motion for return of property is

AFFIRMED.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 30

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that the

expenses of special-order speeches be paid from the Members Representational Allowance of the Members making the speeches.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 6, 2001

Ms. RIVERS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to

require that the expenses of special-order speeches be

paid from the Members Representational Allowance of

the Members making the speeches.

1 Resolved, That (a) rule XVII of the Rules of the

2 House of Representatives is amended by adding at the end

3 the following new clause:

4 ‘‘10. Expenses of any special-order speech shall be

5 paid from the Members Representational Allowance of the

6 Member making such speech.’’.
2

•HRES 30 IH

1 (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take

2 effect on the first day beginning after the date of adoption

3 of this resolution.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KENNETH WAYNE DEAVERS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 57 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 27th day of June, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
IV 

House Calendar No. 229

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 580

[Report No. 107–739] 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 122) making 

further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2003, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 10, 2002

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered 

to be printed 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 

122) making further continuing appropriations for the 

fiscal year 2003, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of 

3 order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. 

4 Res. 122) making further continuing appropriations for 

5 the fiscal year 2003, and for other purposes. The joint 

6 resolution shall be considered as read for amendment. The 
2

HRES 580 RH 

1 previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 

2 joint resolution to final passage without intervening mo3 tion except: (1) one hour of debate on the joint resolution 

4 equally divided and controlled by the chairman and rank5 ing minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; 

6 and (2) one motion to recommit.

House Calendar No. 229

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 580

[Report No. 107–739] 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution 

(H.J. Res. 122) making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2003, and for other purposes. 

OCTOBER 10, 2002

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS ON FORM
10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         1130428
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2498886
<ALLOWANCES>                                     95000
<INVENTORY>                                    1125734
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5479719
<PP&E>                                        21980123
<DEPRECIATION>                                17330271
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                10944430
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3050187
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         35604
<OTHER-SE>                                     7724013
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  10944430
<SALES>                                       17452196
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              17452196
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 13024957
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4438578
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               19539
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (30879)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (32010)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1131
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1131
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Jan. 31: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL in Syria and Iraq
 By CJTF - Operation Inherent Resolve News Release
  January 31, 2015 Release # 20150131
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **SOUTHWEST ASIA -** On Jan. 30, U.S. and Coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria, using fighter aircraft to conduct 10 airstrikes. Separately, U.S. and Coalition military forces conducted 17 airstrikes in Iraq, using attack and fighter aircraft against ISIL terrorists. All strikes took place between 8 a.m., Jan. 30, and 8 a.m., Jan. 31, local time. The following is a summary of the strikes conducted since the last press release: **Syria**
* Near Kobani, eight airstrikes struck two ISIL tactical units and an ISIL building and destroyed five ISIL fighting positions, an ISIL vehicle, an ISIL artillery system, and an ISIL staging position.
* Near Dayr az Zawr, two airstrikes destroyed four ISIL buildings, an ISIL bunker and an ISIL vehicle. **Iraq**
* Near Al Asad, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL rocket tube.
* Near Tal Afar, two airstrikes struck an ISIL large tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL VBIED factory, an ISIL building, six ISIL vehicles, two ISIL heavy weapons and two ISIL pieces of engineer equipment.
* Near Balad, an airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed two ISIL armored vehicles and an ISIL vehicle.
* Near Mosul, two airstrikes struck two ISIL tactical units.
* Near Ramadi, an airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit.
* Near Kirkuk, 10 airstrikes struck two ISIL large tactical units, three ISIL tactical units, four ISIL vehicles, and destroyed an ISIL bunker, three ISIL VBIEDs, an ISIL bulldozer, two ISIL armored vehicles, an ISIL artillery system, seven ISIL fighting positions, four ISIL buildings, and four ISIL vehicles. Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely. The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria, the region, and the wider international community. The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations conducting airstrikes in Iraq include the U.S., Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. Coalition nations conducting airstrikes in Syria include the U.S., Bahrain, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.