alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 574 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                       October 8, 2002.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the joint 
resolution (H.J. Res. 114) to authorize the use of United States Armed Forces 
against Iraq. The joint resolution shall be considered as read for amendment. 
The amendment to the preamble and the amendment to the text recommended by the 
Committee on International Relations and now printed in the joint resolution 
shall be considered as adopted. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the joint resolution, as amended, and on any further amendments 
thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) 17 hours of 
debate on the joint resolution, as amended, equally divided and controlled by 
the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on International 
Relations, which may be extended pursuant to section 2; (2) the further 
amendments printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 
resolution, which may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be 
offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be in order without 
intervention of any point of order or demand for division of the question, shall 
be considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for the time specified 
in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent; 
(3) after the conclusion of consideration of the amendments printed in the 
report of the Committee on Rules, a final period of debate on the joint 
resolution, as amended, which shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
International Relations; and (4) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
    Sec. 2. It shall be in order for the Majority Leader or his designee, after 
consultation with the Minority Leader, to move to extend debate on the joint 
resolution, as amended. Such motion shall not be subject to debate or amendment.
    Sec. 3. During consideration of House Joint Resolution 114 pursuant to the 
first section of this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous 
question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the joint resolution 
to a time designated by the Speaker either on the same legislative day or on the 
next legislative day.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN See LA-23 E LA-106

Honorable&mea U. Btravn CountyAttorney uIllso~ county Ra~ondvllle, Texas Dam sir:

for a written opinion from your requeetl

that the exoeptlon in the constlabeence of mmh a oonatltut~onal exception, itwarn held In the oaae of Mate v. Martin, (Ct. Clv. App.) 51 3. U. (24) 815, that the offiae of s achool trustee vsa not m office of "emolument." Thla offioe ha hold in Opinion IO. 0-3308 that a deputy aherlffmay aerve at the aame time aa a aahool trustee of a common aahool dimtrlot and that the roapectlre duttes ofHonorable &mea W. Stravn, Page 2

each oKIce are not lnoompatlble. A copy ~31’ that op:nlon ie being enclosed for your oonalderat~~on.

In Oplnfon Ho. O-2164, thla department held that s juatfce 0r the pmce may lerve am a city seemtaX 31 the city of Muleahoe at the laae tixaa urd that the reapeatlveduties of each oflice me not Incompatible. A copy of t:rat oplnlon ;a being l

noloaed for your oonalderrtlon. Wehave oarefull~ **oonaLdond** the ~apectlve dutlea ineambentupm a juarIoo of the per00 and l trustee of 911 La**dejmnlent** school dlatrlot and ve oau oamoIv~ of M moundhale upon vhich lt al be meld t&t their napeatlve ofrIce are lncom&Wilble. Relther of?Ioo ia aooountable to, under the dorinIon of or 8ubordIxde to tha otlurf 

### maltherham any right to interfore vlth the othar in the performme of my official duty. Wflcoa arm 

### ino~tible vhen tha dutlea of arch my ba lnoonaIateGt or oonflloting and vhan the 

### porfomuWm of the dutlea of on8 office may Lntorfan vlth tha perfonunce of the dutlea of tha other oft IO*. Se0 Oplnloa lo. O-2188 

### for additional altation 0r

authorltlea, 8copy or vuch **la** l mloaed. Slme mlthmr l deputy aharlffrvr l aomon schooldlatrlct truetee are o?flcera to be paId out of the State Tre&aury, va do not bellove Artlola 10. Sootion 33 of the Texas Conatltutlon la 8pplicable **to Tour**  propoaltlon. opinion no. o-3308.

It la, theefon, our opinion, and you armreapaotfully edvlaed, t&t there la no prohlbltlm la the lava of thin Statevhloh vould prevent a juatlce of tin wee from l emrlng am atruatm ofanIndependent l ohool dlatrlot.
Appendix E

Phantom 2 Vision+ Pilot Training Guide V1.1

12 pages follow

(Source: http://www.dji.com/product/phantom-2-vision-plus/download)
Page intentionally left blank
EXHIBIT 10.29

               AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT JULY 1, 1998


To:  George Chung
        109 Newcastle
        Belmont  CA  94002

Dear George:

This letter serves as an amendment to the Employment Agreement dated 
March 4, 1997.  The changes below are effective July 1, 1998.

The terms of the March 4, 1997 Employment Agreement are amended as 
follows:

3.  COMPENSATION        
  3.1 Base Salary - The annual base salary shall be $150,000 per year.

  3.2 Bonus 

3.2.3 Options to purchase an additional Twenty Thousand (20,000) 
shares of common stock of the Company exercisable at the end 
of each 12 month period beginning July 1, 1998, at $6.5625 
per share, subject to compliance with applicable laws.

The remaining terms and conditions as outlined in the original 
Employment Agreement continue to be in effect.

In Witness Whereof, the Company has caused this Agreement to be executed 
by its respective duly authorized officer, and the Executive has 
hereunto signed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

Company:
AMERICAN CHAMPION ENTERTAINMENT, INC.


By:     /s/ Anthony K. Chan             
      Anthony K. Chan, President & CEO

Accepted:


By:     /s/ George Chung                  Date:   July 1, 1998    
           George Chung

<PAGE>
§ 25.220 Use of award term. ( a ) A Federal agency must include the award term in Appendix A in all Federal financial assistance agreements (see § 25.400) to accomplish the purpose of § 25.100.
( b ) A Federal agency may use different letters and numbers than those in Appendix A to designate the paragraphs of the award term.
2003 10-K Exhibit 10.116.1




Exhibit 10.116.1



{Southwall Logo]   - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORPORATE
HEADQUARTERS
3975 East Bayshore Road

























       Palo Alto, California  94303

        
      Phone 650.962.9115 x1279


       Fax 650.967.0182

swestra@southwall.com


 

 

 

August 28, 2003


Mr. Andrew Kwan

Director

Globamatrix Holdings Pte. Ltd.

PSB Science Park Annex

3 Science Park Drive #02-16

Singapore 118223

Singapore


 

Dear Andrew,


 

With this letter, I want to summarize our meetings in Singapore during the
week of August 18th that covered the proposed changes to the existing
Distribution Agreement, dated January 1, 2002.


In consideration of several factors that have made, and are expected to
continue to make an impact on our business in 2003 and that are beyond the
control of GMX and Southwall (Force Majeure), we have agreed to the
following:



	The minimum, net Purchase Order quantity for 2003 will be adjusted to
$7.6MM
	The quarterly breakdown will be as follows:

	Q1$2.098 MM (already shipped)
	Q2$0.951 MM (already shipped)
	Q3$2.283 MM (existing F/C of $1,425MM + new orders $0.858MM)
	Q4$2.268 MM (existing F/C, unchanged)
	Total$7.6 MM



	The $0.858MM of new orders for Q3 to include orders from the "short and
narrow" inventory list
	To the extent that new products, such as VK-85, VK-15 or VK-Secure are not
available for shipment in Q3 or Q4 as per the current F/C, GMX will order
released products instead. STI shall endeavor to have the new products available
on a best efforts basis.
	Payment terms for the Q3 shipments will be:

	15 days net for VKI and HOI
	60 days net for VK Inc and HOD.



	If VKI or VK Inc. will be successful in securing additional, significant
orders (e.g. Starbucks or the D.O.D. Contract), GMX and STI will discuss again
how this will impact the minimum Purchase Order quantity for 2003 (and
2004)
	The minimum amount of Product for 2004 ($15.25MM per the Supply Agreement)
will be determined at a later date, based on a more accurate estimate of the
final 2003 performance.  The minimum amount of Product for 2004 will reflect a
reasonable growth with respect to 2003 (less extraordinary projects like DOD
contract should it come about), taking into account recovery from Force Majeure
factors ,  the addition of new products (VK-85, VK-15 and VK-Secure),general
growth of the product line, progress in product durability improvements to
facilitate and maintain product sales in key areas as well as STI's resolute
defense of any infringement upon its patents with respect to the Product.  It is
expected that a meeting will be held in late October, early November to agree on
the minimum amount of Product for 2004.




 

 

Can you please sign and date this letter below and return a copy to my
attention as a confirmation and agreement of our understanding.


 

Best regards,


 

 

Sicco W.T. Westra

VP Business Development

Southwall Technologies Inc


 

Read and agreed,


 

 

 

Andrew Kwan

Director

Globamatrix Holdings Pte. Ltd
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 12:01 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Re: RIN 1210-AB39

I am writing to comment on the Proposed Regulations issued by the Department of Labor, 

Employee Benefits Security Administration on November 18, 2015 (“Proposed Regulations”).

First of all, I want to commend the Department of Labor (“Department”) for this very 

constructive proposal. I strongly approve of the comment made by the Department in the 

preamble that “disability claimants deserve protections equally as stringent as those that 

Congress and the President have put into place for health care claimants under the Affordable 

Care Act.”

I am presently a disability recipient under an employer-sponsored disability plan governed by the 

Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) and its requirements regarding 

claims procedures. I can speak first hand to the potential abuses occurring under the current 

claims-procedure regulations and the urgent need to address these in the Proposed Regulations.

After first approving my disability claim, my carrier ultimately decided I needed to go back to 

work. They stopped taking or returning my phone calls, then lied to my doctor to get him to 

approve the return. Ultimately it took a tens of thousands of dollars to a specialty lawyer to 

convince them they were fighting a losing fight. Several of these new regulations could have 

prevented all of the stress and expense I had to go through while I was sick and no longer 

receiving an income. My appeal was denied based on a cursory review by an "independent" 

reviewer. I was never told why my claim was denied or what I could do as far as providing 

additional information to support the claim. The company told my lawyer that all claims for my 

medical condition are immediately sent to extra review regardless of the supporting 

information. It is clear to me that without the services of a specialty attorney, I would never have 

received benefits from the insurance I paid into for my entire career.

When I contrast this experience to that of applying for Social Security disability, it could not 

have been different. When they needed additional information, they asked and I provided it. My 

claim was approved on the initial review. I was told by the reviewer that I had "overwhelming 

evidence", the same evidence that my insurance company claimed was not adequate. It is clear 

the insurance company was not fulfilling their fiduciary responsibility. These regulations would 

go a long way to improve the experience of those filing disability claims in the future.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10QSB
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         173,855
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  186,397
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,080
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               432,208
<PP&E>                                       3,659,782
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,039,635
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,107,351
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,870,695
<BONDS>                                        741,142
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,487
<OTHER-SE>                                     451,027
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,107,351
<SALES>                                        323,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               342,243
<CGS>                                          192,201
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  420,584
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,694
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,610
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (134,645)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (134,645)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (134,645)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21.1
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

HSSI Travel Nurse Operations, Inc.
6245 North Federal Highway, Suite 400
Fort Lauderdale, FL  33308

HSS Recruiting, Inc.
6245 North Federal Highway, Suite 400
Fort Lauderdale, FL  33308

HSSI Medicare Home Office, Inc.
d/b/a Home Care Home Office
6245 North Federal Highway, Suite 400
Fort Lauderdale, FL  33308

Hospital Staffing Services of Massachusetts, Inc.
d/b/a Alternative Care Medical Services
6245 North Federal Highway, Suite 400
Fort Lauderdale, FL  33308

Hospital Staffing Services of Rhode Island, Inc.
d/b/a Alternative Care Medical Services
6245 North Federal Highway, Suite 400
Fort Lauderdale, FL  33308

Hospital Staffing Services of Tennessee, Inc.
d/b/a Mid-South Comprehensive Home Health
6245 North Federal Highway, Suite 400
Fort Lauderdale, FL  33308

All-Care Professional Services, Inc.
6245 North Federal Highway, Suite 400
Fort Lauderdale, FL  33308

HSSI of Georgia, Inc.
d/b/a Tri-Therapy
6245 North Federal Highway, Suite 400
Fort Lauderdale, FL  33308

HSSI Proprietary Home Office, Inc.
6245 North Federal Highway, Suite 400
Fort Lauderdale, FL  33308

Hospital Staffing Services of California, Inc.
6245 North Federal Highway, Suite 400
Fort Lauderdale, FL  33308

Hospital Staffing Services of Florida, Inc.
6245 North Federal Highway, Suite 400
Fort Lauderdale, FL  33308

HSSI Acquisition Corp.
6245 North Federal Highway, Suite 400
Fort Lauderdale, FL  33308


<PAGE>


Hospital Staffing Services Medicare of Broward, Inc.
6245 North Federal Highway, Suite 400
Fort Lauderdale, FL  33308

Hospital Staffing Services Medicare of Palm Beach, Inc.
6245 North Federal Highway, Suite 400
Fort Lauderdale, FL  33308

HSSI of Florida Proprietary, Inc.
6245 North Federal Highway, Suite 400
Fort Lauderdale, FL  33308

Cardinal Nursing and Home Care, Inc.
6245 North Federal Highway, Suite 400
Fort Lauderdale, Florida  33308

Cura Care, Inc. of Arizona
6245 North Federal Highway, Suite 400
Fort Lauderdale, Florida  33308

Hospital Staffing Services of New Jersey, Inc.
6245 North Federal Highway, Suite 400
Fort Lauderdale, Florida  33308

Hospital Staffing Services of Pennsylvania, Inc.
6245 North Federal Highway, Suite 400
Fort Lauderdale, Florida  33308

HSS Advertising, Inc.
6245 North Federal Highway, Suite 400
Fort Lauderdale, Florida  33308

HSS Associates, Inc.
6245 North Federal Highway, Suite 400
Fort Lauderdale, Florida  33308

Staff Source, Inc.
6245 North Federal Highway, Suite 400
Fort Lauderdale, Florida  33308

HSSI Management Company, Inc.
6245 North Federal Highway, Suite 400
Fort Lauderdale, Florida  33308

Hospital Staffing Services of Caribbean, Inc.
6245 North Federal Highway, Suite 400
Fort Lauderdale, Florida  33308

HSSI of New York, Inc.
6245 North Federal Highway, Suite 400
Fort Lauderdale, Florida  33308

HSSI of Texas, Inc.
6245 North Federal Highway, Suite 400
Fort Lauderdale, Florida  33308
IV

House Calendar No. 159

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 422

[Report No. 107–466]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4737) to reauthorize and improve

the program of block grants to States for temporary assistance for

needy families, improve access to quality child care, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 15, 2002

Ms. PRYCE, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4737) to reauthorize and improve the program of block grants to

States for temporary assistance for needy families, improve access to quality child care, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of

3 order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4737) to

4 reauthorize and improve the program of block grants to

5 States for temporary assistance for needy families, im-
2

HRES 422 RH

1 prove access to quality child care, and for other purposes.

2 The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. The

3 previous question shall be considered as ordered on the

4 bill and on any amendment thereto to final passage with5 out intervening motion except: (1) two hours of debate on

6 the bill, with 50 minutes equally divided and controlled

7 by the chairman and ranking minority member of the

8 Committee on Ways and Means, 40 minutes equally di9 vided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minor10 ity member of the Committee on Education and the Work11 force, and 30 minutes equally divided and controlled by

12 the chairman and ranking minority member of the Com13 mittee on Energy and Commerce; (2) an amendment in

14 the nature of a substitute printed in the report of the

15 Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if of16 fered by Representative Cardin of Maryland or his des17 ignee, which shall be in order without intervention of any

18 point of order, shall be considered as read, and shall be

19 separately debatable for one hour equally divided and con20 trolled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one

21 motion to recommit with or without instructions.

House Calendar No. 159

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 422

[Report No. 107–466]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4737)

to reauthorize and improve the program of blockgrants to States for temporary assistance forneedy families, improve access to quality childcare, and for other purposes.

MAY 15, 2002

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001035039
<NAME>                        INVU, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                  FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    APR-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                          0
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   13,672
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     42,256
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                127,657
<PP&E>                          368,749
<DEPRECIATION>                  89,994
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  406,412
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,880,039
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        288,355
<OTHER-SE>                      (2,338,122)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    406,412
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                12,943
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   505,143
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              (31,317)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (523,517)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (523,517)
<EPS-BASIC>                     (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.02)



</TABLE>
From: Beth Perez [mailto:bperez@kantorlaw.net] 

Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 1:49 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB39

I write to oppose the 90 day delay of the effective date of the Disability

Regulations.

I am an attorney who represents claimants. 

For claimants, the regulations are a step forward toward a more level playing field. As 

we know, fairness is paramount in this process. These Regulations provide more 

fairness as well as but also more transparency into the decision making process so that 

participants may know what evidence they have to address and have a full and fair 

opportunity to address all of it.

The new Regulations are a solid step forward in due process in the benefits 

administrative process at a small, if any, cost to the plan. 

Thank you,

Beth Davis Perez, Esq.

KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP

19839 Nordhoff Street

Northridge, CA 91324