This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains documents other than rules or

proposed rules that are applicable to the

public. Notices of hearings and investigations,

committee meetings, agency decisions and

rulings, delegations of authority, filing of

petitions and applications and agency

statements of organization and functions are

examples of documents appearing in this

section.

Notices Federal Register

41741 

Vol. 77, No. 136 

Monday, July 16, 2012 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

July 10, 2012. 

The Department of Agriculture has 

submitted the following information 

collection requirement(s) to OMB for 

review and clearance under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

Public Law 104–13. Comments 

regarding (a) Whether the collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

agency, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate 

of burden including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; (c) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on those who are to respond, including 

through the use of appropriate 

automated, electronic, mechanical, or 

other technological collection 

techniques or other forms of information 

technology should be addressed to: Desk 

Officer for Agriculture, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB), 

OIRA_Submission@OMB.EOP.GOV or 

fax (202) 395–5806 and to Departmental 

Clearance Office, USDA, OCIO, Mail 

Stop 7602, Washington, DC 20250– 

7602. Comments regarding these 

information collections are best assured 

of having their full effect if received 

within 30 days of this notification. 

Copies of the submission(s) may be 

obtained by calling (202) 720–8958. 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor a collection of information 

unless the collection of information 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number and the agency informs 

potential persons who are to respond to 

the collection of information that such 

persons are not required to respond to 

the collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number. 

Economic Research Service 

Title: Survey on Rural Community 

Wealth and Health Care Provision. 

OMB Control Number: 0536–NEW. 

Summary of Collection: Health care 

services is one of the largest and most 

rapidly growing industries in rural 

America, and adequate provision of 

health care services is critical for 

achieving economic development and 

improved well-being of rural people. In 

many rural communities, the health care 

services sector is the largest employer, 

and rapid growth in this sector is 

occurring and likely will continue, 

especially as the Baby-Boom generation 

retires. Provision of adequate health 

care services may be a key factor 

attracting retirees and other migrants to 

rural areas, contributing to rural growth 

and prosperity. Despite recent growth 

and potential for continued growth in 

this sector, many rural communities 

suffer from poor access to health care 

services, especially because of the 

limited supply of health care 

professionals. 

Need and Use of the Information: The 

Economic Research Service will collect 

information using a survey on the assets 

and investments of rural communities 

and their influence on recruitment and 

retention of rural health care providers, 

and on the effects of rural health care 

provision on economic development of 

rural communities. The survey will be 

collected by telephone from individuals, 

including rural health care providers 

and community leaders, in 150 rural 

communities. If the information is not 

collected, research and knowledge on 

the roles rural communities play in 

recruiting and retaining health care 

providers will remain limited. 

Description of Respondents: 

Individuals or household; State, Local 

or Tribal Government. 

Number of Respondents: 4,500. 

Frequency of Responses: Reporting: 

On occasion. 

Total Burden Hours: 1,865. 

Ruth Brown, 

Departmental Information Collection 

Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2012–17234 Filed 7–13–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–18–P 

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD 

INVESTIGATION BOARD 

Sunshine Act Meeting 

In connection with its continued 

analysis of effective safety performance 

indicators for major accident prevention 

and to release preliminary findings on 

the use of indicators offshore as part of 

the agency’s investigation of the 

Macondo well blowout, explosion, and 

fire in the Gulf of Mexico, the U.S. 

Chemical Safety Board is holding a two 

day public hearing entitled ‘‘Safety 

Performance Indicators,’’ on Monday, 

July 23, 2012, and Tuesday, July 24, 

2012, in Houston, Texas. The hearing 

will be held from 9 a.m.–5 p.m. both 

days at the Hyatt Regency Hotel located 

at 1200 Louisiana Street in the Imperial 

West Auditorium. The hearing is free 

and open to members of the public. 

The hearing will bring together 

international regulators, union 

representatives and industry groups to 

discuss how companies and regulators 

use safety metrics to manage risks and 

drive continuous safety improvements. 

The CSB’s Board Members and 

Macondo investigation team will hear 

testimony from leading safety experts 

from high hazard industry sectors 

within the U.S. and internationally, 

including representatives from the 

United Kingdom, Australia, and 

Norway. Throughout the proceedings, 

CSB Board Members, staff and the 

public will have opportunities to ask 

questions of the panelists. The hearing 

will be available via webcast. All 

proceedings will be videotaped and 

subsequently transcribed. 

The first day of the hearing will focus 

on the downstream refining and 

petrochemical sectors. It will feature a 

presentation by CSB staff on the Board’s 

evaluation of the American Petroleum 

Institute’s (API) Recommended Practice 

for Process Safety Performance 

Indicators for the Refining and 

Petrochemical Industries (ANSI/API RP 

754). API RP 754 was developed in 

response to a CSB recommendation 

resulting from the agency’s investigation 

into the BP Texas City refinery fire and 

explosion that killed 15 workers and 

injured 180 others. The CSB found that 

effective safety performance indicators 

for major accident prevention were not 

being used to drive safety 

improvements. The lessons learned 

from other high hazard industries with 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
41742 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 136 / Monday, July 16, 2012 / Notices 

1The Regulations are currently codified in the 

Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR Parts 730– 

774 (2012). The charged violations occurred in 

2006–2008. The Regulations governing the 

violations at issue are found in the 2006–2008 

versions of the Code of Federal Regulations (15 CFR 

Parts 730–774 (2006–2008)). The 2012 Regulations 

set forth the procedures that apply to this matter. 

2 50 U.S.C. app. §§ 2401–2420 (2000). Since 

August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse and the 

President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 

17, 2001 (3 CFR 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has 

been extended by successive Presidential Notices, 

the most recent being that of August 12, 2011 (76 

FR 50661 (Aug. 16, 2011)), continues the 

Regulations in effect under the International 

Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, 

et seq.). 

advanced indicator programs will also 

be discussed during the first day of the 

hearing. 

The second day will include a 

presentation by CSB staff on 

preliminary findings of the agency’s 

Macondo incident investigation on the 

use of safety indicators and major 

accident prevention. Evidence will be 

presented on the way safety was 

managed at Macondo and the influence 

of the regulator in driving safety 

performance offshore. 

All staff presentations are preliminary 

and are intended solely to allow the 

Board to consider in a public forum the 

issues and factors involved in this case. 

No factual analyses, conclusions or 

findings presented by staff should be 

considered final until approved by the 

Board. 

Please notify CSB if a translator or 

interpreter is needed, at least 5 business 

days prior to the public meeting. For 

more information, please contact Hillary 

J. Cohen at hillary.cohen@csb.gov at the 

Chemical Safety and Hazard 

Investigation Board at (202)–261–7600, 

or visit our Web site at: www.csb.gov. 

The CSB is an independent Federal 

agency charged with investigating 

industrial accidents that result in the 

release of extremely hazardous 

substances. The agency’s board 

members are appointed by the President 

and confirmed by the Senate. CSB 

investigations look into all aspects of 

accidents, including physical causes 

such as equipment failure as well as 

inadequacies in regulations, industry 

standards, and safety management 

systems. 

Daniel Horowitz, 

Managing Director. 

[FR Doc. 2012–17304 Filed 7–12–12; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 6350–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[Order No. 1838] 

Reorganization and Expansion of 

Foreign-Trade Zone 202 Under 

Alternative Site Framework Los 

Angeles, CA 

Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the 

following Order: 

Whereas, the Board adopted the 

alternative site framework (ASF) (74 FR 

1170, 01/12/2009; correction 74 FR 

3987, 01/22/2009; 75 FR 71069–71070, 

11/22/2010) as an option for the 

establishment or reorganization of 

general-purpose zones; 

Whereas, the Board of Harbor 

Commissioners of the City of Los 

Angeles, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 

202, submitted an application to the 

Board (FTZ Docket 9–2012, filed 02/09/ 

2012) for authority to reorganize and 

expand under the ASF with a service 

area of Orange County and portions of 

Los Angeles and San Bernardino 

Counties, California, within and 

adjacent to the Los Angeles-Long Beach 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

port of entry, FTZ 202’s Site 9 would be 

renumbered to create new Sites 30 and 

31, Sites 1, 4, 7, 10–11, 14, 20 and 22 

would be categorized as magnet sites, 

Sites 2, 5, 9, 12, 15, 19, 25, 27–28 and 

30–31 would be categorized as usage 

driven sites, Sites 16, 24 and 26 would 

be removed from the zone project, and 

the grantee proposes one new usagedriven site (Site 29); 

Whereas, notice inviting public 

comment was given in the Federal 

Register (77 FR 8804–8805, 02/15/2012) 

and the application has been processed 

pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s 

regulations; and, 

Whereas, the Board adopts the 

findings and recommendation of the 

examiner’s report, and finds that the 

requirements of the FTZ Act and the 

Board’s regulations are satisfied, and 

that the proposal is in the public 

interest; 

Now, therefore, the Board hereby 

orders: 

The application to reorganize FTZ 202 

under the alternative site framework is 

approved, subject to the FTZ Act and 

the Board’s regulations, including 

Section 400.13, to the Board’s standard 

2,000-acre activation limit for the 

overall general-purpose zone project, to 

a five-year ASF sunset provision for 

magnet sites that would terminate 

authority for Sites 4, 7, 10–11, 14, 20 

and 22 if not activated by July 31, 2017, 

and to a three-year ASF sunset 

provision for usage-driven sites that 

would terminate authority for Sites 2, 5, 

9, 12, 15, 19, 25, 27–31 if no foreignstatus merchandise is admitted for a 

bona fide customs purpose by July 31, 

2015. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of 

July 2012. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import 

Administration, Alternate Chairman, ForeignTrade Zones Board. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2012–17294 Filed 7–13–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

In the Matter of: Humane Restraint, 

Inc., 912 Bethel Circle, Waunakee, WI 

53597, Respondent; Order Relating To 

Humane Restraint, Inc 

The Bureau of Industry and Security, 

U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘BIS’’), 

has notified Humane Restraint, Inc. of 

Wanakee, WI (‘‘HR’’), of its intention to 

initiate an administrative proceeding 

against HR pursuant to Section 766.3 of 

the Export Administration Regulations 

(the ‘‘Regulations’’),1 and Section 13(c) 

of the Export Administration Act of 

1979, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’),2 through 

the issuance of a Proposed Charging 

Letter to HR that alleged that HR 

committed 32 violations of the 

Regulations. Specifically, these charges 

are: 

Charges 1–27 15 CFR 764.2(a)— 

Engaging in Prohibited Conduct by 

Exporting Various Restraint Devices 

Without the Required Government 

Authorizations 

On 27 occasions between on or about 

April 10, 2006 and on or about August 

8, 2008, HR engaged in conduct 

prohibited by the Regulations by 

exporting various restraint devices, 

including, but not limited to, strait 

jackets, bed restraints, and wrist and 

ankle restraints, items subject to the 

Regulations, classified under Export 

Control Classification Number 

(‘‘ECCN’’) 0A982, controlled for Crime 

Control reasons, and valued at 

approximately $14,697, from the United 

States to Germany, Greece, Hungary, 

Ireland, New Zealand, South Korea, 

Taiwan, and the United Kingdom 

without the Department of Commerce 

licenses required by Section 742.7(a) of 

the Regulations. In so doing, HR 

committed 27 violations of Section 

764.2(a) of the Regulations. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES