alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
K.en Oeia. RN 

Son D•ma1. CA 

.. 

Olymp"'-WA 

Danny Donohue 

Albany. NY 

David R. Fillman 

Homsburr,PA 

Michael Fox 

Homsbur£,.PA 

G.anison 

Lorhom.NY 

lt>ttleHarrell 

IWI•om!lown. NJ 

f¢f'a.nna Puno Hester 

Son D·•to.CA 

Danny J.Homon 

Ot-s. Moines. tA 

Mel•in HU&h•• Sr 

Houslon,TX 

Luciano 

New 8ntam, CT 

John A. Lyall 

W<lrrhmrton. OH 

K>thryn lyborzer 

Oaktond.CA 

Robert.> Lynch 

Chicaro. tL 

Christopher Mabo 

Wes:e1vtlie. OH 

Glenonl S. Middleton Sr. 

&Ttntto<t.MD 

11.11ph M.ller 

los Anteles, CA 

Gary Mlldloll 

ModJson,Wt 

Vlctorio E. Mitchell 

New York. NY 

Dougi.Js Moore •r 

Moroney 

6ouon,MA 

Newm::11n 

ChiCofD,Il 

Honry Nicholas 

l'ndodelpl"o.I'A 

Randy Perrelro 

H011olnlu,Hf 

SteVen Quick Sr 

lndionopot.s,IN 

Ulii:onl\oberu 

N<WYor .. NY 

Eddie Rodncuez 

A. Roeh" 1 

Lansine,Ml 

)lneph P. Ru10lo 

Colnmbus.OH 

Eliot Sf:jde 

South Stl'oul. MN 

Mary E.Sullivon 

Albany. NY 

Bnulio Torres 

Son Juon,I'R 

J .. nette D. Wynn 

FL 

Employee Benefits Security Administration 

U.S. Department of Labor 

200 Constitution A venue, NW 

Washington, DC 20210 

Re: RIN-1210-AB39 

Claims Procedure for Plans Providing Disability Benefits 

Dear Ms. Borzi: 

On behalf of the 1.6 million members of the American Federation of State, 

County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), I am writing to express our support for 

the regulations proposed by the Department of Labor (DOL) and the Employee Benefits 

Security Administration (EBSA), via RIN 121 0-AB39, that would revise and strengthen 

the rules regarding claims filed for disability benefits by adopting certain procedural 

protections already applicable to group health plans under the Affordable Care Act 

(ACA). 

AFSCME is a union made up of a diverse group of people who share a 

commitment to public service, worker voice, and fairness in the resolution of 

employment disputes. Therefore, AFSCME supports the aforementioned regulations 

being proposed that improve procedural protections for workers who become disabled 

and make claims for disability benefits under retirement and health care plans covered 

by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). 

One recommendation we would make is that the final regulation require plans to 

provide claimants with a clear and prominent statement of any applicable limitation 

period and the expiration date for the claim at issue for appealing a final notice of 

adverse benefit determination, and with an updated notice of that expiration date if 

tolling or some other event causes that date to change. 

SK/dd 

AFSCME appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Proposed Rule. 

Respectfully, 

Director Department of Research and 

Collective Bargaining Services 

American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO 

TEL (202) 429-1000 FAX (202) 429-1293 TOO (202) 659-0446 WEB www.31icme.org 1625 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036-5687
Exhibit 23




               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                                
                                
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement of ALPHARMA INC., (formerly A.L. Pharma
Inc.) on Form S-8 File No. 33-60495 of our report dated March 4,
1996, on our audits of the financial statements and financial
statement schedule of ALPHARMA INC. and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1995 and 1994, and for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1995, which report is included on
page F-2 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.





                              COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Parsippany, New Jersey
March 22, 1996
# Strike Against AQAP and Abu Khattab al Awlaqi in Yemen

/ Published June 22, 2017

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES CENTRAL COMMAND

7115 South Boundary Boulevard

MacDill AFB, Fla. 33621-5101

Phone:(813) 529-0220

June 20, 2017

RELEASE #20170622-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**Strike Against AQAP and Abu Khattab al Awlaqi in Yemen**

**TAMPA, Fla.**– U.S. forces conducted an airstrike against three al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula militants in Shabwah Governorate, Yemen, June 16, to disrupt terrorist compounds, and attack networks in Yemen. Abu Khattab al Awlaqi, the emir for AQAP’s terrorist stronghold in Shabwah Governorate, was killed in the strike along with two of his AQAP associates.

Al Awlaqi was a senior leader responsible for planning and conducting terrorist attacks against civilians. He had significant influence throughout AQAP’s terrorist stronghold, had ties and access to the group’s other senior leaders, and was implicated in planning and leading efforts to exacerbate instability in Southern Yemen.

In coordination with the government of Yemen, U.S. forces are conducting a series of sustained counterterrorism operations in Yemen against AQAP to degrade the group’s ability to hold territory and coordinate external terror attacks. Senior AQAP leaders seek safe haven in places like Shabwah Governorate to plot attacks against the U.S., our interests, and our friends and allies across the world. Al Awlaqi’s death removes a trusted and experienced terrorist leader from AQAP’s ranks.

In recent years, AQAP has taken advantage of ungoverned spaces in Yemen to plot, direct and inspire terror attacks against the U.S., its citizens and allies around the world. The group and its predecessors  attacked the U.S. Embassy-Sanaa in 2008, attempted to down Northwest Airlines 253 on Christmas Day 2009, and conspired to send explosive-laden parcels to Chicago in 2010. The group has also used its English-language magazine, Inspire, to encourage attacks against the West, and has been linked to the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, 2009 Ft. Hood shooting, and other lone-wolf attacks in the U.S. and Europe. AQAP is a formidable terror group that remains committed and capable of attacking U.S. citizens and the homeland. The Yemeni leadership is working with Arab allies to remove AQAP from its governorates.

U.S. forces conducted this strike with the full support of the government of Yemen. In conjunction with our Arab allies, the U.S. will continue to support their efforts and fight terrorist organizations like AQAP.”

-30-
EXHIBIT 99.2

Supplement to Registrant's Registration Statements on Form S-8

In  accordance  with  the  requirements  of  Form  S-8,  the  registrant  hereby
supplements any discussion of the  indemnification  provisions of the registrant
in all of the registrant's  registration statements previously filed on Form S-8
with the following undertaking:

Insofar as indemnification  for liabilities  arising under the Securities Act of
1933 may be permitted to  directors,  officers  and  controlling  persons of the
registrant pursuant to the foregoing  provisions,  or otherwise,  the registrant
has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities  and Exchange  Commission
such  indemnification  is against  public policy as expressed in the Act and is,
therefore,  unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against
such liabilities  (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred
or paid by a director,  officer,  or controlling person of the registrant in the
successful  defense of any  action,  suit or  proceeding)  is  asserted  by such
director,  officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being
registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter
has been  settled by  controlling  precedent,  submit to a court of  appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such  indemnification  by it is against public
policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of
such issue.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED September 2, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-51372 Summary Calendar

LONNIE D. CLARK; RUBEN WHITE, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus ANDREWS COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT; ANDREWS COUNTY, TEXAS; ROYCE UNDERWOOD, Tax Assessor-Collector for Andrews County, Texas, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-02-CV-119

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Lonnie D. Clark (Clark) and Ruben White (White) appeal the dismissal of their suit against various taxing authorities of Andrews County, Texas, alleging violations of their due process and equal protection rights guaranteed under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Clark and White asserted that the Andrews County taxing authorities assessed their property at a muchNo. 02-51372 -2- higher value than comparable properties and ignored their requests for an administrative hearing before the local tax board. The district court dismissed the suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, finding that the action was barred by the Tax Injunction Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1341. The Tax Injunction Act prohibits the federal district court from exercising jurisdiction over a suit to “enjoin, suspend or restrain the assessment, levy or collection of any tax under State law where a plain, speedy, and efficient remedy may be had in the courts of such State.” 28 U.S.C. § 1341. Clark and White could adjudicate their claims fully in Texas state court. See McQueen v. Bullock , 907 F.2d 1544, 1547-50 (5th Cir. 1990). They “have not demonstrated that the state courts have refused to entertain their federal claim[s]” or “that their state remedy is uncertain or speculative.” See Smith v. Travis County Education District , 968 F.2d 453, 456 (5th Cir. 1992). Thus, the Texas state courts provide Clark and White with “plain,” “speedy,” and “efficient” remedies, and the federal court is barred from reviewing their claims by the Tax Injunction
Act. See McQueen , 907 F.2d at 1550. The district court did not err in dismissing Clark and White’s claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See id. Accordingly, the district court judgment is AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KENNETH WAYNE DEAVERS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 57 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### The Land Company of New Mexico (Limited), Appellant, v. Stephen B. Elkins and others, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
§ 392.9b Prohibited transportation. ( a ) *Safety registration required.* A commercial motor vehicle providing transportation in interstate commerce must not be operated without a safety registration and an active USDOT Number.
( b ) *Penalties.* If it is determined that the motor carrier responsible for the operation of such a vehicle is operating in violation of paragraph (a) of this section, it may be subject to penalties in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 521.
[78 FR 52655, Aug. 23, 2013, as amended at 81 FR 68358, Oct. 4, 2016]
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

See LA-23 E LA-106 

Honorable &mea U. Btravn 

County Attorney 

uIllso~ county 

Ra~ondvllle, Texas 

Dam sir: 

for a written opinion 

from your requeetl 

that the exoeptlon in the constlabeence of mmh a oonatltut~onal exception, it warn held In the 

oaae of Mate v. Martin, (Ct. Clv. App.) 51 3. U. (24) 815, 

that the offiae of s achool trustee vsa not m office of 

"emolument." Thla offioe ha hold in Opinion IO. 0-3308 that 

a deputy aherlff may aerve at the aame time aa a aahool trustee 

of a common aahool dimtrlot and that the roapectlre duttes of 
Honorable &mea W. Stravn, Page 2 

each oKIce are not lnoompatlble. A copy ~31’ that op:nlon ie 

being enclosed for your oonalderat~~on. 

In Oplnfon Ho. O-2164, thla department held that s 

juatfce 0r the pmce ma y l erve am a city seemtaX 31 the city 

of Muleahoe at the l aae tixaa urd that the reapeatlve duties of 

each oflice me not Incompatible. A copy of t:rat oplnlon ;a 

being l noloaed for your oonalderrtlon. 

We have oarefull~ oonaLdond the ~apectlve dutlea 

ineambent upm a juarIoo of the per00 and l trustee of 911 Ladejmnlent school dlatrlot and ve oau oamoIv~ of M mound hale 

upon vhich lt al be meld t&t their napeatlve ofrIce are lncom&Wilble. Relther of?Ioo ia aooountable to, under the dorinIon of or 8ubordIxde to tha otlurf malther ham any right to 

interfore vlth the othar in the performme of my official duty. 

Wflcoa arm ino~tible vhen tha dutlea of arch my ba lnoonaIateGt or oonflloting and vhan the porfomuWm of the dutlea 

of on8 office may Lntorfan vlth tha perfonunce of the dutlea 

of tha other oft IO*. Se0 Oplnloa lo. O-2188 for additional altation 0r authorltlea, 8 cop y or vuc h la l mloaed. 

Slme mlthmr l deputy aharlffrvr l aomon school dlatrlct truetee are o?flcera to be paId out of the State Tre&aury, 

va do not bellove Artlola 10. Sootion 33 of the Texas Conatltutlon la 8pplicable to Tour propoaltlon. opinion no. o-3308. 

It la, theefon, our opinion, and you arm reapaotfully edvlaed, t&t there la no prohlbltlm la the lava of thin 

State vhloh vould prevent a juatlce of tin wee from l emrlng 

am a truatm o f a n Indep endel ohool nt dlatrlot.
#### § 655.16 Requirement to disseminate policy.

Each employer shall provide written notice to every covered employee and to representatives of employee organizations of the employer's anti-drug and alcohol misuse policies and procedures.
Exhibit
3





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin
L. Cornwell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.














/s/
Kevin L. Cornwell


Kevin L.
Cornwell


Chief
Executive Officer


May 8,
2009








A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of 1 

~6G-- J) YV /2 -Ii 

(LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 


PUBLICATION &. REGULAnON~_ 

BRANCH As of: August 20, 2010 

Received: August 09, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 20, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2cbd8 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-001O-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0232 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

-------------------------------------------------------------.... 


Submitter Information 

Name: Barbara R Money 

Address: 

53A North Road 

Foster, RI, 02825 

Email: bmoney9@verizon.net 

Phone: 401-397-7987 

General Comment 

Please see attached file. 

-------------------------------------------------------------,---­

Attachments 

IRS-2010-0010-0232.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

https:llfdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency/componentlsubmitterInfoCoverPage?Call;::;... 8/20/2010 
August 9, 2010 

Office ofConsumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department ofHealth and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status as a 


Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 


As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on the 


interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-201 0-001 0-0(01). 


I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally important and 


should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort should be made to 


increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) 


via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would extend these protections to consumers 


under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not be weakened or reduced in any way. I 


specifically support the position and detailed comments offered by the American Chiropracti<: 


Association with respect to the implementation ofthese regulations. 


Regards, 


Barbara R. Money
From: Cindy Peel [mailto:frenz50@comcast.net] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 2:19 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: pension plans

Hello,

I am writing to express vehement opposition to the government taking control of 40'k and IRA 

plans. 

Thank you,

Regards,

Cynthia Peel

Naples, Florida
Petraeus visits Kyrgyzstan-based troops
 By Staff Sgt. Olufemi Owolabi , 376th Air Expeditionary Wing
  
 MANAS, Kyrgyzstan — Making a brief stop here, the U.S. Central Command Commander Gen. David Petraeus visited men and women at the Transit Center at Manas, Kyrgyzstan, Aug. 16. During his visit, Petraeus briefed service members and coalition forces deployed to the Transit Center as well as talked about the roles they play, serving as the gateway for personnel transiting in and out of Afghanistan. "What you're doing here has directly enabled all that is going on in Afghanistan," Petraeus said. During the briefing at Pete's Place, Petraeus answered questions from Airmen and asked leadership for thoughts on improving the Center. The general had high praise for Manas members. "You are America," Petraeus said. "Your actions and what you've done recently in particular, such as helping the citizens of this country, the Birdik School and other local schools, are fostering a great positive relationship between the United States and Kyrgyzstan. You actions are very impressive." He personally thanked Airmen, Soldiers, Sailors and Marines here for their hardwork and service, and reminded them to extend his thanks to their families too for the sacrifices they make every day. After the briefing, Petraeus took time to visit the Personnel Support for Contingency Operations tent where he met with and coined Soldiers transiting on their way to Afghanistan. He also took time to visit the transient living area, where he shook hands and talked with service members transiting through, either on their way home or going to Afghanistan. The general's visit here culminated at the 376th Air Expeditionary Wing Headquarters Building, where he was greeted by, Col. Adam Dabrowski, 376th AEW vice commander. Before his departure, Petraeus spent some time with the Director of the Transit Center, Col. Blaine Holt, who is also the commander of the 376th AEW.
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00514-CV

IN RE Michael DEMARQUIS

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 11, 2010

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On July 13, 2010, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief

sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

1... This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009-CI-00689, styled Michael DeMarquis v. Patrick Stolmeier,

in the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Renée F. McElhaney presiding. However, the

order complained of was signed by the Honorable Peter Sakai, presiding judge of the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar

County, Texas.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.35

                                AMENDMENT ONE TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

                  AMENDMENT ONE TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated February 28,
2000, by and between VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company, and its affiliates, subsidiaries, successors or assigns, (the
"Company"), and William Raney (the "Employee").

                  WHEREAS, The Company and the Employee desire to modify the
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT in the following manner;

                  NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises
hereof and the mutual covenants contained herein and in the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
dated February 28, 2000, the parties hereto hereby covenant and agree as
follows:

1.       Restrictive Covenants. Paragraph 9(d) of the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is
deleted in its entirety and the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is amended as follows:

                  (d)      Certain Definitions. For purposes of this Section 9,
         a person or entity (including, without limitation, the Employee) shall
         be deemed to be a competitor of one or more of the Companies, or a
         person or entity (including, without limitation, the Employee) shall be
         deemed to be engaging in competition with one or more of the Companies,
         if such person or entity conducts, or, to the knowledge of the
         Employee, plans to conduct, the Specified Business (as hereinafter
         defined) as a significant portion of its business in any of the local
         telephone exchange markets served by the Companies. For purposes of
         this Agreement, "Specified Business" means (A) providing local
         telephone service or engaging in a business conducted by the Company at
         the time of termination of the Employee's employment with the Company
         or (B) conducting, operating, carrying out or engaging in the business
         of managing any entity described in clause (A).

2.       All other terms of the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT shall remain in full force
and effect.

<PAGE>

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Employee have duly
executed and delivered this AMENDMENT ONE TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT.

                                                   VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC

                                                   By: /s/ Kenneth R. Cole
                                                   -----------------------
                                                   Name: Kenneth R. Cole
                                                   Title: President & CEO
                                                   Date: January  , 2002

                                                   /s/ William Raney
                                                   -----------------
                                                   William Raney
                                                   Date: January  , 2002

                                      2