alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 850.10 Preliminary investigation by the Coast Guard. ( a ) The Coast Guard conducts the preliminary investigation of marine casualties.
( b ) The Commandant determines from the preliminary investigation whether: ( 1 ) The casualty is a major marine casualty; or
( 2 ) The casualty involves a public and a nonpublic vessel and at least one fatality or $75,000 in property damage; or
( 3 ) The casualty involves a Coast Guard and a nonpublic vessel and at least one fatality or $75,000 in property damage; or
( 4 ) The casualty is a major marine casualty which involves significant safety issues relating to Coast Guard safety functions, e.g., search and rescue, aids to navigation, vessel traffic systems, commercial vessel safety, etc.
( c ) The Commandant notifies the Board of a casualty described in paragraph (b) of this section.
[42 FR 61204, Dec. 1, 1977, as amended at 47 FR 46089, Oct. 15, 1982]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 22, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-51363

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARTIN JIMENEZ-SANTOS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:04-CR-520-1

--------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Martin JimenezSantos raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a

prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,224
<SECURITIES>                                     9,596
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,984
<ALLOWANCES>                                       175
<INVENTORY>                                      3,050
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,950
<PP&E>                                          13,386
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,686
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,294
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,187
<BONDS>                                         24,161
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,081
<OTHER-SE>                                    (11,135)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,294
<SALES>                                         12,626
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,966
<CGS>                                            9,301
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,572
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,435)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,532
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (22,004)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,503)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,501)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,501)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.15)
        

</TABLE>
### GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

### Department of Energy and Environment

December 28, 2015 Shawn M. Garvin Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region III (Mail Code: 3RAOO) 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 Subject: District ofColumbia's Infrastructure SIP Revision for the 2012 Fine Particulate Matter Standards Dear Mr. Garvin: Pursuant to the authority set forth in Sections 5 and 6 ofthe District ofColumbia Air Pollution Control Act of 1984, effective March 15, 1985, as amended (D.C. Law 5-165; D.C. Official Code 

### §§ 8-101.05 and 8-101.06 (2012 Repl. & 2015 Supp.)); Sections 107(4) and 110 ofthe District Department ofthe Environment Establishment Act of2005, effective February 15,2006 (D.C. Law 16-51; D.C. Official Code 

### §§ 8-151.07(4) and 8-151.10 (2012 Repl. & 2015 Supp.)); Mayor's Order 2006-61, dated June 14,2006; and Mayor's Order 2015-191, dated July23,2015, the District ofColumbia (District) is herebyrequesting approval ofa revision to its State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted in accordance with the requirements of40 C.F.R. Part 51. The District isrequesting approval ofthis SIP revision to meet certain federal CleanAir Act requirements under Section 110(a)(2). The SIP revision describes how the District is implementing the "infrastructure" elements for the 2012 fine particulate matter (PM2.s) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). A Notice ofPublic Hearing and Public Comment Period was posted in the 

### D.C. Register on November 20,2015 (62 DCR 015109, Notice ID 5739604). The following are included with this SIP submittal package:
• One paper copy ofthe Infrastructure SIP submittal for the 2012 PM2.s NAAQS; • Public hearing notice; • Hearing officer's certification; • Onepaper copyofthe D.C. Official Code 

### § 8-101.05 (2015) as a reference; • Onepaper copy ofthe D.C. Official Code § 8-101.05a to § 8-101.05g (2015) as a reference; • Onepaper copyofthe D.C. Official Code § 8-101.06 (2015) as a reference; • Onepaper copyofthe D.C. Official Code 

### § 8-151.07 (2015) as a reference; • One disk containing an electronic version ofthe SIP revision. The electronic version includes an exact duplicate ofthe paper copy ofthe SIP revision submittal.

WEARE 

# * * * * * * DEPARTMENT

---------------------------- wlSHilJGTOA

## =:O~ ENERGY 

### &
. . ENVIRONMENT 1200 First Street NE, 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20002 

### I (202) 535-2600 

### I doee.dc.gov

# oc

### Should youhave any questions orrequire additional information, please contact me at (202) 535­ 2615, orMs. Cecily Beall, Associate Director for the Air Quality Division, at (202) 535-2626.

Director Enclosure
cc: DianaEsher, Director, AirProtection Division, EPA Region 3 Cecily Beall, Associate Director, Air Quality Division, DDOE

Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2011-0456 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-NE-15-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: SP3201EN-E

ASE Printed Name: Alan Strom 8/24/11 Date

Branch Manager Date
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT OR FOR THE YEAR ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1996 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,697,767
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  877,778
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,988
<INVENTORY>                                  1,631,375
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,368,343
<PP&E>                                         437,182
<DEPRECIATION>                                 118,609
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,975,295
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,378,406
<BONDS>                                        501,333
<COMMON>                                     2,153,489
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (57,933)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,975,295
<SALES>                                        999,337
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,178,427
<CGS>                                          417,873
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  417,873
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               212,907
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,803
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (855,013)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (855,013)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (855,013)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
## Date: August, 28, 2015

From: Aerovue Imagery, LLC

Sub j: Additional Information Request (FAA

- 2015

- 0961)

UAV Specifications Information

AEROVUE IMAGERY UAV BASIC SPECIFICATIONS

Manufacturer/Model/Type Dimensions inchs Aircraft Weight

kg/lb Max Payload

kg/lb Max Operating Wgt

kg/lb Max Operating

Time

DJI/ S1000/ Octocopter 41.15 Diagonal W 4.2/9.25 6.8/15.0 11.0/24.25 15mins

DJI/ Inspire/Quadcopter 11.75x17.25x17.75 2.9/6.4 Integrated 2.9/6.4 18mins

Yuneec/Q500 Typhoon/Quadcopter 8.3x16x16 1.13/2.5 Integrated 1.7/3.75 25mins
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CITY PENSION FUND FOR

FIREFIGHTER S AND POLICE OFFICERS IN THE CITY OF

PEMBROKE PINES and THE CITY OF PEMBROKE PINES
, Appellant s ,

v.

KENNETH FRITZ, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly

situated

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 1794

[ March 21, 2019 ]

Appeal and cross

- appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; William W. Haury , Judge; L.T. Case No.

11

- 0003579 (13)

.

Scott A. Cole of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Miami, for appellant The

Board of Trustees of T he City Pension Fund For Firefighter s A nd Police

Officers in T he City of Pembroke Pines.

Michael T. Burke of Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke, Piper & Hochman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant The City of Pembroke Pines.

Karen Coolman Amlong and Jennifer Daley of Amlong & Amlong, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN
, C ONNER and F ORST
, JJ. concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT
32





Certification
of Periodic Report


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant
to, and for purposes only of, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned hereby certifies
that (i) the Quarterly Report of Shore Bancshares, Inc. on Form 10-Q, as amended
on Form 10-Q/A, for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii)
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Shore Bancshares,
Inc.





Date:  August
      27, 2009
              /s/ W. Moorhead VermilyeW.
      Moorhead VermilyePresident/Chief
      Executive OfficerDate:  August
      27, 2009
              /s/ Susan E. LeavertonSusan
      E. Leaverton, CPATreasurer/Principal
      Accounting Officer
#### Attorney General v. Continental Life Insurance Company.

Motion for reargument granted.
Page 1 of 1
EP Bak REG- 1) F412-/0

AL PROCESSING DIVISION
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS
° BRANCH

As of: September 08, 2010

PU B LIC Received August 15, 2010

Posted: September 08, 2010
SUBMISSION Comments Duet August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0845
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Robin Wieder
Address:
East Rockaway, NY,

General Comment

do not support grand fathering for insurance companies to escape consumer protections. see
attached

Attachments

IRS-2010-0010-0845.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 9/8/2010


August 15, 2010

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to
Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

Robin Wieder
61 Judith Court
East Rockaway, NY 11518
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.88 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 46

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Agriculture in

the One Hundred Seventh Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 14, 2001

Mr. COMBEST submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on

Agriculture in the One Hundred Seventh Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Agriculture

4 (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Com5 mittee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there

6 shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House

7 of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses,

8 not more than $10,010,397.00 for the One Hundred Sev9 enth Congress.
2

•HRES 46 IH

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

2 Of the amount specified in section 1—

3 (1) not more than $4,918,497.00 shall be avail4 able for expenses incurred during the period begin5 ning at noon on January 3, 2001, and ending imme6 diately before noon on January 3, 2002; and

7 (2) not more than $5,091,900.00 shall be avail8 able for expenses incurred during the period begin9 ning at noon on January 3, 2002, and ending imme10 diately before noon on January 3, 2003.

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration.

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by

19 the Committee on House Administration.

Æ
H. Res. 568

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 3, 2002.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 112)

making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2003, and for other purposes. The joint resolution shall be

considered as read for amendment. The previous question

shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution to final

passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of

debate on the joint resolution equally divided and controlled

by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit.

Attest:

Clerk.
# April 10 USCENTCOM Conducts Humanitarian Airdrops into Gaza

/ Published April 10, 2024

April 10, 2024Release Number 20240410 - 01 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla. –**U.S. Central Command conducted an air drop of humanitarian assistance into Northern Gaza on April 10, 2024, at 1:08 p.m. (Gaza time) to provide essential relief to civilians affected by the ongoing conflict.

The joint operation included four C-130 U.S. Air Force aircraft, and U.S. Army Soldiers specialized in aerial delivery of U.S humanitarian assistance supplies.

The U.S. C-130s dropped over 50,680 U.S. meal equivalents into Northern Gaza, an area of great need, allowing for civilian access to the critical aid. To date the U.S. has dropped approximately 852 tons of humanitarian assistance supplies.

During today's mission, one of the bundles landed in the shallow water near shore. USCENTCOM does not assess civilian harm or damage to infrastructure at this time but continues to monitor the situation.

The DoD humanitarian airdrops contribute to ongoing U.S. and partner-nation government efforts to alleviate human suffering. These airdrops are part of a sustained effort, and we continue to plan follow-on aerial deliveries.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.08 MB)
 
 Puller; USS Puller; United Kingdom; Mobile base; platform
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil