alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-----Original Message----- 

From: Abernathy, William L [mailto:William.Abernathy@Teradata.com] 

Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 5:36 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 

To let you know that I personally and everyone I have spoken to (about 

35 people to date) do not support any part of government involvement is 

what our 401Ks/IRAs are invested in. We definitely want to maintain the 

current control we have over "our" money. Also, investment in a large 

percentage of bonds is no way to stay up with inflation and allow your 

money to grow until you die. Some comments I received are "Over my dead 

body", "No way in HE**", "I'll move to Canada first". I think you get 

the message. 

Bill 

William L. Abernathy Jr. - Engineering Manager Teradata Test 

Engineering Teradata Database Engineering 

858-485-3839 (wk) 

760-533-4991 (cell)
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1058.html[7/22/2015 7:10:04 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-xrgc

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1058

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Herbert Elenbaas

General Comment

Obama,Reid and Pelosi, stay away from my retirement. We will fight you all the way to keep you from doing

 what you have been planning all along, that is to destroy America. I love this country too much to have 3 losers

 destroy it.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Business and Economy    >Wholesale    >Monthly    >FAQs    >Sample Revision FAQs
 Skip to looking for section Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  **Monthly Wholesale Trade - Sample Revision FAQs**
  What is a sample revision and why is it necessary?  improve the efficiency of each sample
	incorporate updates to the industry classification structure
	expand industry coverage of the survey
	update questions and instructions to obtain more accurate data, and
	redistribute burden for small and medium size businesses.    How often is sample revision performed for the Monthly Wholesale Trade Survey?
   What is the size of the Monthly Wholesale Trade Survey sample?   Are the estimates from the prior and new samples comparable? https://www.census.gov/wholesale/pdf/mwts/methods/MWTS_Stratification.pdf
  What is the impact of adopting the 2012 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) definitions for the Monthly Wholesale Trade Survey? https://www.census.gov/naics/


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
Unsafe, Unprofessional Action by IRGCN Vessels toward U.S. Naval Forces in Arabian Gulf
 
  By U.S. Naval Forces Central Command Public Affairs
  Three vessels from Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy (IRGCN) interacted in an unsafe and unprofessional manner as U.S. Navy ships transited the Strait of Hormuz, June 20.
Patrol coastal ship USS Sirocco (PC 6) and expeditionary fast transport ship USNS Choctaw County (T-EPF 2) were conducting a routine transit in international waters when three Iranian fast inshore attack craft approached.
One of the IRGCN vessels approached Sirocco head-on at a dangerously high speed and only altered course after the U.S. patrol coastal ship issued audible warning signals to avoid collision. The Iranian vessel also came within 50 yards of the U.S. Navy ship during the interaction, and Sirocco responded by deploying a warning flare.
The full interaction among all vessels lasted one hour and ended when the IRGCN craft departed the area. U.S. Navy ships continued their transit without further incident.
The IRGCN’s actions did not meet international standards of professional or safe maritime behavior, increasing the risk of miscalculation and collision.
U.S. naval forces remain vigilant and will continue to fly, sail and operate anywhere international law allows while promoting regional maritime security.
# Bright Star 2023 highlights the long-standing Egyptian-American ties

/ Published Sept. 8, 2023

**TAMPA, Fla. -** Exercise Bright Star 2023 began Aug. 31, 2023, at the Mohamed Naguib Military Base, Alexandria, Egypt. Jointly led by the Egyptian Armed Forces and those from the U.S. Central Command, Bright Star is the oldest multilateral military exercise in the Middle East and Africa first occurring in 1980. The biannual multinational exercise is designed to enhance interoperability among the 34 participating nations and support their ability to confront security and military challenges at regional and international levels. 

“Bright Star has long been an example of the military-to-military partnerships in the CENTCOM area of responsibility,” said Gen. Michael “Erik” Kurilla, commander of U.S.Central Command. “This year’s exercise demonstrates the strength of the U.S. Egyptian military cooperation and deepens the interoperability of all the partnering nations.”This military exercise continues this historic partnership and plays a leading role in counterterrorism, regional security, and efforts to combat the spread of violent extremism.

Bright Star will continue until Sept. 14, this year focusing on subject matter expert exchanges, Command Post Exercises, and Field Training Exercises in the following disciplines:- Counterterrorism and irregular warfare- Planning and executing joint military operations on tactical and operational/strategiclevels- Planning and Conducting Common air operations- Maritime security operations- Securing international borders- Integrated air and missile defense- Joint tactical air control- Cyber security operations 

Approximately 8,000 troops from participating nations are currently on Egyptian soil for Bright Star. The Egyptian Armed Forces provided more than 2,300 troops, and the U.S. provided approximately 1,500 service members. The other countries with troops on the ground during the exercise include: Cameroon, Cyprus, France, Germany, Greece, India, Italy, Jordan, Kuwait, Malawi, Pakistan, Qatar, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, South Africa, and the United Kingdom. The International Committee of the Red Cross and Egyptian police elements are also participating.

Additionally, the following countries are participating as observers: Australia, Bahrain, Brazil, Republic of the Congo, Hungary, Japan, Nigeria, Oman, Poland, Rwanda, Sudan, Tanzania, Tunisia, Uganda, and the United Arab Emirates.  Bright Star strengthens the long-standing defense cooperation partnership between Egypt and the United States. Large-scale exercises, such as Bright Star, improve security and stability across the CENTCOM area of operations and the African continent.
From: Wilhelm, Pete [mailto:pete@lowtaxsolutions.com] 

Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 6:30 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Fiduciary status for appraisers 

ESOPs are already costly and complex. Fiduciary status is not the answer unless your intent is 

to destroy small ESOPs. Increased penalties for erroneous appraisals may be a more 

reasonable approach. 

Thank You 

Peter A Wilhelm, EA, MS Taxation 

 

Wilhelm & Associates, Ltd. 

256R North Washington Street 

Falls Church, VA 22046 

(703) 356-5005 ext 202 

fax (703) 356-5955 

www.lowtaxsolutions.com

Turning Tax Aggravation 

Into Low Tax Solutions 

 

The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are 

intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged 

information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Wilhelm & Associates, 

Ltd.immediately at (703) 356-5005 or pete@lowtaxsolutions.com and destroy all copies of this 

message and any attachments. 

 

Pursuant to requirements related to practice before the Internal Revenue Service, any tax advice 

contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended to be used, and 

cannot be used, for purposes of (i) avoiding penalties imposed under the United States Internal 

Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another person any tax-related 

matter.
# Euroopa Liidu C 153A/10.

| | ISSN 1725-5171 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 153A |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 47. köide10. juuni 2004 |

ISSN 1725-5171

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 153A

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

47. köide10. juuni 2004

---

| Teatis nr | Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Teatised |
| | Nõukogu |
| 2004/C 153A/1 | Vaba ametikoht (Ref. A/013) | 1 |

Teatis nr

Sisukord

Lehekülg

III   Teatised

Nõukogu

2004/C 153A/1

Vaba ametikoht (Ref. A/013)

1

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

III Teatised

Nõukogu

| 10.6.2004 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CA 153/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2004

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CA 153/1

---

VABA AMETIKOHT

(Ref. A/013)

AMETNIK

(2004/C 153 A/01)

Euroopa ühise julgeoleku- ja kaitsepoliitika raames kavatseb nõukogu peasekretariaat tööle võtta astme A*9 ametniku peadirektoraadi E — välissuhted — VIII direktoraati, mis tegeleb kaitseküsimustega.

Täpsemat teavet (inglise ja prantsuse keeles) ning avalduse vorme saab personalivaliku ja töölevõtu osakonnast (Selection and Recruitment Department) e-posti teel: service.recrutement@consilium.eu.int või Internetist aadressil: http://ue.eu.int/concours.

Tähtaeg: 9. juuli 2004 vastavalt postitempli kuupäevale.

---
<Page>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.13

          Confidential Materials omitted and filed separately with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission. Asterisks denote omissions.


Mr. Chris Efstathiou
VP Global Procurement
Marconi Communications, Inc.
1000 Fore Drive
Warrendale
PA  15086-7502
United States of America

                                                                17 December 2003

Dear Chris,

GLOBAL PROCUREMENT AGREEMENT DATED 1 FEBRUARY 2002 BETWEEN MARCONI
COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND BOOKHAM TECHNOLOGY PLC, AS AMENDED BY LETTERS DATED 27
FEBRUARY 2002, 13 JUNE 2002, 10 JANUARY 2003 AND 27 JUNE 2003 ("GPA")

Following our recent discussions, this letter is to confirm formally a
re-phasing of Marconi's minimum purchase commitment under the GPA and to specify
the products comprising Marconi's order commitment under the GPA for the fourth
calendar quarter of 2003.

In this letter, references to numbered quarters ("Qs") are to calendar quarters.
References to $ are to US dollars, translated from the sterling commitment in
the GPA at an exchange rate of 1.61 dollars to the pound. The exchange rate for
the outstanding GPA amount will be reviewed at the end of Q4'03, and the dollar
amounts for Q1 and Q2 2004 will be recalculated at that time.

We agree as follows (and the GPA is amended accordingly):

1.     Marconi's commitment for Q4 2003 is $[**]. This will be fulfilled by
       Marconi placing additional purchase orders, on or before 12 December
       2003, for delivery of the following Bookham products on or before 31
       December 2003:

       o    [**]    [**] pieces, $[**] each, total value: $[**]

       o    [**]    [**] pieces, $[**] each, total value: $[**]

       o    [**]    [**] pieces, $[**] each, total value: $[**]

2.     The phasing of Marconi's minimum quarterly purchase commitments under the
       GPA following Q4 is now as follows:

       o    Q1 04: $[**]

       o    Q2 04: $[**]

<PAGE>


3.     Marconi will pay all outstanding invoices for product delivered under the
       GPA (specifically, the $[**] which was agreed for Q3'03) by no later than
       19 December 2003.

This letter extends the initial term of the GPA to 30 June 2004 and clause 8.1
of the GPA shall be deemed amended accordingly.

Please sign below to confirm Marconi's agreement to these terms.

Yours sincerely,


/s/ Byron Trop
Byron Trop
Vice President, Sales
Bookham Technology plc



I confirm my agreement to the terms set out above.


/s/ CHRIS EFSTATHIOU
------------------------------------
Chris Efstathiou, Vice President Global Procurement
For and on behalf of Marconi Communications, Inc.
08-16-10 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO–9991–IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244–1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Below are my comments regarding the Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health 

Insurance Coverage Relating to Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient 

Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). 

I believe that every effort should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by 

PPACA, especially as of January 1, 2014 when most of the reform components (Insurance 

Exchanges, Subsidies, Tax Credits, etc.) come into play. 

 

The average consumer has a broad definition of “benefits.” Consumers view their health plan 

beyond the covered benefits, cost sharing, and the contribution levels associated with the plan. 

It is my opinion that the Rule may still result in some confusion to the marketplace in its 

application. For example, if an employer raised the copayment level beyond the maximum in one 

area (i.e. outpatient services) but retained the copayment level for primary care doctor visits, 

does that mean a loss of grandfather status? Clarity will be critical both for the employer and the 

employee. 

Even by the most optimistic estimates, a substantial portion of the employee population will 

remain outside the PPACA as of January 2014 based on the current rules. While I understand the 

difficulty involved in making change, creating another large sub-population of excluded 

individuals will only add to costs, increase confusion, and mitigate the potential impact of the 

legislation. 

The Rule needs to be clear, reasonable, and with no ambiguities involved in determining whether 

a group health plan is “in or out.” The decisions the federal government makes today will 

determine the outcomes for tomorrow. We may need to make some difficult decisions to create 

a sustainable health care system that will support a growing economy in the future. That means 

getting as many citizens across the country participating at the beginning to make it work and 

delivering on its promises to retain their support. 

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this regulation. 

James Ash, DC, RD, ACN
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION









Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Michael J. Mancuso, Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Computer Sciences Corporation (the Company), hereby certify
that:




(1)  The
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 3, 2009 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: May
      28, 2009
            
            /s/Michael
      J. Mancuso
              Vice
      President and Chief Financial
Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 547 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 25, 2002.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the resolution (H. Res. 540) expressing the sense of the 
House of Representatives that Congress should complete action on H.R. 3762, the 
Pension Security Act of 2002. The resolution shall be considered as read for 
amendment. The resolution shall be debatable for one hour equally divided among 
and controlled by the chairmen and ranking minority members of the Committees on 
Education and the Workforce and Ways and Means. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the resolution to final adoption without intervening 
motion.
    Sec. 2. Upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the resolution (H. Res. 544) expressing the sense of the 
House of Representatives on permanency of pension reform provisions. The 
resolution shall be considered as read for amendment. The resolution shall be 
debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the resolution to final adoption 
without intervening motion.
    Sec. 3. Upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the resolution (H. Res. 543) expressing the sense of the 
House that Congress should complete action on H.R. 4019, making marriage tax 
relief permanent. The resolution shall be considered as read for amendment. The 
resolution shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the resolution to final 
adoption without intervening motion.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. 2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-30212 Summary Calendar

RICKEY EVANS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus BRYAN READY; E. BOUDREAUX; JOSEPH M. TURNER; D. BORDELON; RONNIE JETT, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 99-CV-1032-B

-------------------- September 17, 2002 Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Rickey Evans, Louisiana prisoner # 108026, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Evans argues that the district court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of defendant Sergeant Bryan Ready on Evans’s claims of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs and retaliation. Evans has failed to show that he stated a claim3

for deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. See Estelle v. Gamble , 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976). With regard to the retaliation claim, Evans’s conclusional allegations are insufficient to meet his summary judgment burden. See Little v. Liquid Air Corp ., 37 F.3d 1069, 1075 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc). Evans also argues that the district court erred in dismissing his complaint against all of the other defendants for failure to state a claim. Because he did not allege any personal involvement by these defendants in the withholding of his medications, Evans failed to state a claim for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs against these defendants. See Lozano v. Smith , 718 F.2d 756, 768 (5th Cir. 1983). At most, Evans’s allegations against these defendants stated a claim of negligence, which is insufficient to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Varnado v. Lynaugh , 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). Evans has failed to present any argument as to the propriety of the district court’s denial of his postjudgment motion. Thus that issue has been abandoned. Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993).
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 11

                        ZMAX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

         CALCULATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                                  (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      Three Months                      Nine Months
                                                                   Ended September 30,               Ended September 30,
                                                              ----------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  1998             1997             1998             1997
                                                              -------------    -------------    -------------    -------------
                                                                        (unaudited)                       (unaudited)
<S>                                                           <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARE CALCULATIONS

BASIC WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:

Weighted average shares of common stock
  Outstanding                                                   11,729,714        6,458,774       10,805,714        5,558,970

Less: Average number of cancelable shares
  common stock outstanding                                        (479,801)        (479,801)        (479,801)        (479,801)
                                                              -------------    -------------    -------------    -------------

Basic weighted average shares outstanding                       11,249,913        5,978,973       10,325,913        5,079,169
                                                              =============    =============    =============    =============

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding:

Basic weighted average shares outstanding:                      11,249,913        5,978,973       10,325,913        5,079,169

Treasury stock effect of options and warrants                          374                -                -                -

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding:                    11,250,287        5,978,973       10,325,913        5,079,169
                                                              =============    =============    =============    =============
</TABLE>