alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 593.5 Petitions for eligibility determinations. ( a ) A manufacturer or Registered Importer may petition the Administrator for a determination that a vehicle that does not comply with all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards is eligible for importation, either ( 1 ) On the basis that the vehicle: ( i ) Is substantially similar to a vehicle which was originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United States and which bore a certification affixed by its manufacturer pursuant to part 567 of this chapter, and
( ii ) Is capable of being readily modified to conform to all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards; or
( 2 ) On the basis that the vehicle has safety features that comply with or are capable of being modified to comply with all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards.
( b ) Each petition filed under this part must— ( 1 ) Be written in the English language;
( 2 ) Be headed with the words “Petition for Import Eligibility Determination” and submitted in three copies to: Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Fourth Floor, Room W43-481, Mail Code NVS-220, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
( 3 ) State the full name and address of the petitioner.
( 4 ) If the petitioner is a Registered Importer, include the Registered Importer Number assigned by NHTSA pursuant to part 592 of this chapter.
( 5 ) Set forth the basis for the petition and the information required by § 593.6 (a) or (b), as appropriate;
( 6 ) Specify any part of the information and data submitted which petitioner requests be withheld from public disclosure in accordance with part 512 of this chapter; and
( 7 ) Submit a certified check payable to the Treasurer of the United States, for the amount of the vehicle eligibility petition fee established pursuant to part 594 of this chapter.
( c ) The knowing and willful submission of false, fictitious or fraudulent information may subject the petitioner to the criminal penalties of 18 U.S.C. 1001.
[54 FR 40099, Sept. 29, 1989, as amended at 55 FR 37330, Sept. 11, 1990; 76 FR 53080, Aug. 25, 2011]
# Not Adjusted Sales and EC

# CVs
Afghan pilots closer to providing own air support
 By None  , Combined Security Transition Command
  
 KABUL, Afghanistan (June 29, 2009) – After an absence of nearly a decade, the Afghan Mi-35 is again flying the skies of Afghanistan, thanks to pilots from the Afghan National Army Air Corps and the Czech Republic, military officials here said. On May 27, Afghan Mi-35 attack helicopters fired 12.7 mm rounds and 57 mm rockets near Bagram Air Base. Each partnered Afghan and Czech Republic crew fired 200 rounds of ball ammunition and 16 rockets while practicing gunnery on the East River Range Complex. The practice session was the culmination of more than a year’s work to rebuild the Mi-35 program, which gives the Afghan National Army dedicated, armed aircraft for the first time in eight years. The seven-hour training was supported by personnel and equipment from the ANAAC, the Czech Republic Operational Mentor and Liaison Team, Combined Security Transition Command - Afghanistan mentors and personnel from Task Force Thunder at Bagram Air Base. After the completion of the live-fire training, the lead pilot from the Czech team, Major Juracka, commented, “The Afghan shooting was perfect.” The Czech team began ground training and limited flight training for Afghan Mi-35 crewmembers last summer. In January, Afghan Mi-35 training increased greatly with the arrival of six refurbished helicopters. Since then, the Czech team has completed assessments on nine pilots and added a more aggressive training program. To date, the Afghan pilots have received training on pre-mission planning, contact maneuvers, emergency procedures, navigation, and presidential escort operations. After the completion of their gunnery tables, the Afghan pilots will receive training on pre-planned and close air support combat missions. Future Mi-35 initiatives will put even more emphasis on independent Afghan training operations. The Afghan air corps is building its own arming points and is working on an initiative to complete all its Mi-35 live-fire training at Afghan facilities, while the Kabul Military Training Center is developing standardized Mi-35 live-fire training procedures. The air corps also is researching live-fire training locations throughout Afghanistan to better integrate the Mi-35 with the army. All of the efforts are aimed at decreasing the time for an Mi-35 training flight from seven to three hours, effectively doubling the amount of live-fire sorties that can be accomplished in a day. The Mi-35’s combat radius permits it to conduct combat operations anywhere in the country. The aircraft’s unique design allows it to be used in attack, air assault or medical evacuation roles. It can be configured with a 12.7 mm Gatling type machine gun, 57 mm rocket pods, and the AT-6 Spiral Anti-tank guided missile. The helicopters typically fly with 1,470 rounds of ball ammunition, 128 rockets and two anti-tank missiles. “The new capability is good for the Afghan National Army and for the country of Afghanistan,” Afghan Maj. Gen. Dawran, the air corps commander, said.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,452,008
<ALLOWANCES>                                   441,313
<INVENTORY>                                  1,942,362
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,203,653
<PP&E>                                       1,473,107
<DEPRECIATION>                                 264,812
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,411,948
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,195,004
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,851,657
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,644,323)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,411,948
<SALES>                                      8,015,326
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,015,326
<CGS>                                        6,984,684
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,984,684
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                94,508
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             140,124
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,669,841)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,669,841)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,669,841)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.50)



</TABLE>
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

Case No. 5D23-2571

LT Case No. 2018-CF-007876-A 

_____________________________ 

CHRISTOPHER JEFFERSON, 

Appellant,

v. 

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee.

_____________________________ 

3.850 appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. 

Tatiana Salvador, Judge. 

Christopher Jefferson, Malone, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Darcy Townsend, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent. 

February 13, 2024 

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

EDWARDS, C.J., WALLIS, AND MACIVER, JJ., concur. 
2 

_____________________________ 

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331. 

_____________________________
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Last Will and Testament of Ellen M. Mallen, Deceased.

Decree affirmed, with costs. Opinions by

Daniels, J., and by Brady, J.,

dissenting.
H. Res. 521

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 12, 2002.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 5193) to amend the

Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction to certain taxpayers for elementary and secondary education expenses. The bill shall be considered as read for amendment.

The amendment recommended by the Committee on Ways

and Means now printed in the bill shall be considered as

adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered

on the bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening

motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means;

and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### John Cousins and others, Executors, etc., Appellants, v. Lewis Cairncross and others, Commissioners, etc., Respondents.

Judgment reversed, new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
#### § 92.37 Non-waiver of rights by payment.

An employee's payment or agreement to pay, whether voluntary or involuntary, of all or any portion of an alleged debt being collected pursuant to these procedures shall not be construed as a waiver of any rights which the employee may have under this part to the extent of such payment or agreement.
IV

House Calendar No. 154

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 414

[Report No. 107–447]

Providing for the disposition of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 84) disapproving the action taken by the President under section 203 of the

Trade Act of 1974 transmitted to the Congress on March 5, 2002.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 7, 2002

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for the disposition of the joint resolution (H.J.

Res. 84) disapproving the action taken by the President

under section 203 of the Trade Act of 1974 transmitted

to the Congress on March 5, 2002.

1 Resolved, That the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 84) dis2 approving the action taken by the President under section

3 203 of the Trade Act of 1974 transmitted to the Congress

4 on March 5, 2002, is hereby laid on the table.
House Calendar No. 154

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 414

[Report No. 107–447]

RESOLUTION

Providing for the disposition of the joint resolution

(H.J. Res. 84) disapproving the action taken bythe President under section 203 of the Trade Actof 1974 transmitted to the Congress on March 5,2002.

MAY 7, 2002

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
#### § 655.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to establish programs to be implemented by employers that receive financial assistance from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and by contractors of those employers, that are designed to help prevent accidents, injuries, and fatalities resulting from the misuse of alcohol and use of prohibited drugs by employees who perform safety-sensitive functions.
Duluth leaves its mark on PSAB
 
  By Staff Sgt. Noah Tancer
  PRINCE SULTAN AIR BASE, SAUDI ARABIA -- The U.S. Air National Guard’s 148th Fighter Wing, deployed their 179th Fighter Squadron to AFCENT’s area of responsibility in mid-April of 2022. Under the command of the 378th Air Expeditionary Wing, the 179th adopted the expeditionary moniker as they operated out of Prince Sultan Air Base in the heart of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
During their activation, the 179th Expeditionary Fighter Squadron flew over 730 sorties with more than 4,600 flight hours, conducted two Agile Combat Employment exercises with Partner Nation forces in Oman and Egypt, and demonstrated credible coalition airpower to enhance regional security.
“Our mission was to stabilize the region, advance multinational interoperability and deter potential adversaries,” said Senior Master Sgt. Glen Flanagan, the senior enlisted member of 179th EFS’s deployment. “Day in and day out we met the air-tasking order objectives almost flawlessly. To pull off two ACE missions in the middle of that and have the opportunity to operate how we train was awesome to see.”
Back home in the northern U.S. climate of Duluth, Minnesota, the Guardsmen operate primarily during the day, focusing on training and alert operations in support of Homeland Defense missions. In the KSA they worked a high operations tempo, launching and recovering Block 50 F-16CM Fighting Falcons to deliver safe and effective combat airpower at all hours of the day or night.
“At PSAB our focus was on the mission,” said Flanagan. “We took on more risk because there were real adversaries to deal with. So it was a pretty intense assignment the whole time they were up there.”
While the fighter pilots forged partnerships and deterred aggressors in the air, the Guardsmen on the ground enhanced intratheater interoperability.
“Having some of our specialists learn how to be a crew chief and doing those functions well was really good to see,” said Flanagan. “We also had a couple of different groups come down from the 379th out of Al Udeid. We trained their weapons guys on how to do integrated combat turns on F-16s and their crew chiefs how to do hot pit refueling.”
The joint base multi-capability training conducted by Duluth has increased fighter sortie range and longevity throughout the AOR as the 379th Air Expeditionary Wing in Qatar now has Airmen capable of reloading and refueling F-16s still running for quick turn take-offs.
“We had a high number of first-time deployers and personnel in leadership positions this deployment,” said Flanagan. “We relied on them to perform the way we trained them and they came through.”
The 179th EFS has since redeployed home, replaced by the 79th Expeditionary Fighter Squadron from Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina.
11/18/2013050100150200250300350400450Apr‐11 Jul‐11 Oct‐11 Jan‐12 Apr‐12 Jul‐12 Oct‐12 Jan‐13 Apr‐13 Jul‐13 Oct‐13

Monthly Sales Volume (thousands of gallons)FlexFuelSalesDirectSupplyfromanIllinoisDryGrindCornBio‐refiner
Page 1 of 2

-ESSING DIVISION
LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION,
PUBLICATION Sean fECUGH2ZT1C AUG 2 3 2010

As of: August 20, 2010

PUBLIC Btatust Posted

Posted: August 20, 2010
SUBMISSION Coa eee 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0302
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Johnene S Cheney
Address:

PO Box 183

Mc Doanld, KS, 67745
Email: johnenecheney@hotmail.com
Submitter's Representative: Hon. Jerry Moran
Organization: n/a
Government Agency Type: Federal
Government Agency: HHS

General Comment

08.09.10
ATTN: HHS

The new health care reform law enacted by Congress (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act)
requires health insurance plans to adhere to a broad new set of consumer protections. However,
some health insurance plans will be allowed to “escape” having to provide these new consumer-
friendly protections because they will be granted what is called “grandfathered” status under
recently released regulations.

The American Chiropractic Association (ACA) supports the adoption of regulations that would
restrict the use of this “loophole” and extend the important consumer protections to as many
patients as possible.

Tam a citizen & are allowed to submit these formal comments to the federal Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS) on this important issue.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=..._ 8/20/2010



Page 2 of 2

I support the efforts of the ACA on behalf of my Families Chiropractic Care.

Johnene S. Cheney

http://fdms.erulemaking .net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/20/2010
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

#### § 40.405 May the Federal courts review PIE decisions?

The Director's decision is a final administrative action of the Department. Like all final administrative actions of Federal agencies, the Director's decision is subject to judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 551 *et. seq*).
i i i i i i



### MEMORANDUM OPI NIO N No. 04-10-00612- CR IN RE Terr ance F LET CHER Orig inal Mandamus Proce eding 1 PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Kar en Ang elini, J ustice

Phy lis J . Speedlin, J ustice Steven C. Hilbig, Just ice Deliver ed and F iled: September 8, 2010 PETI TI ON F OR WR I T OF MANDAMUS DEN I ED On Aug ust 24, 2010, rela tor Terr ance Fletc her filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining of the trial court’s failure to g rant his pro se motions for speedy trial. Howeve r, counsel has been reta ined by rela tor to repr esent him in the criminal proce eding pending in the trial court for which he is curr ently confine d. A criminal defe ndant is not entitled to hy brid repr esenta tion. See Robinson v. State , 240 S.W .3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Patrick v. State , 906 S.W .2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). A trial cour t has no leg al duty

to rule on pro se motions or petitions filed with reg ard to a crimi n al p ro ce ed ing in which the defe ndant is repr esente d by counsel. See Robinson , 240 S.W .3d at 922. Consequently , the trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining

1 ... T h i s p r o c e e d i n g a r i s e s o u t o f C a u s e N o . 2 0 1 0

- C R
- 1 3 8 4 , s t y l e d S t a t e o f T e x a s v . T e r r a n c e F l e t c h e r , p e n d i n g i n t h e 2 2 7 t h J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t C o u r t , B e x a r C o u n t y , T e x a s , t h e H o n o r a b l e P h i l i p K a z e n p r e s i d i n g .0 4

- 1 0

- 0 0 6 1 2

- C R

to rule on rela tor’s p r o s e m o t i o n filed in the criminal proce eding pending in the trial court. Acc ording ly , the petition is denied. T E X . R. A P P . P. 52.8(a)
. PER C URI AM DO NOT PUBL I SH

- 2

-
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 470 Agreed to House (ATH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 470

 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 8, 2002

Mr. Frost submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Resources: Mr. Holden of Pennsylvania.
    Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure: Mr. Capuano of 
Massachusetts.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
financial  statements  and is  qualified  in its  entirety by  reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                        APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                          MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                    430,711
<SECURITIES>                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             543,042
<ALLOWANCES>                                               91,000
<INVENTORY>                                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        1,804,219
<PP&E>                                                  7,277,849
<DEPRECIATION>                                         (4,292,197)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          5,873,259
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   1,814,073
<BONDS>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                   33,133
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                              2,572,753
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            5,873,259
<SALES>                                                 8,895,408
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        8,895,408
<CGS>                                                   7,740,670
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           7,740,670
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           33,449
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       (521,173)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         1,188,187
<INCOME-TAX>                                               80,786
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     1,107,401
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                            1,107,401
<EPS-BASIC>                                                0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                0.33


</TABLE>
PEC -14969/ 0F Page 1 of 1

PROCESSING PIVIEION APR 1 2 2010
PUBLICATION & REG! ATIGNS
BRANCH

As of: April 12, 2010
Received: April 10, 2010
Status: Posted
PUBLIC SUBMISSION [rostes: sori 12 2010
Comments Due: May 03, 2010]
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0006
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants & Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Comment On: IRS-2010-0006-0001
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Document: IRS-2010-0006-0067
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-02028

Submitter Information

Address:
Knoxville, TN,

General Comment

I understand exactly what this proposed legislation will do and am very much opposed to the
entire idea. I've been responsible and have saved for retirement since I began working more than
16 years ago. I will NOT stand by and allow the government to confiscate my life's savings in
return for an empty promise to "take care of me" when I reach a government decided "retirement
age"!!! The completely broke Social Security "Trust Fund” is a perfect example of why this won't
work. My sacrifices to save all my life will not be squandered away by the government. I will not
allow that to happen.

I am working diligently to make everyone I know aware of what is going on with this legislative
proposal. I am going to do everything I can do to ensure it is defeated and that any elected
representative who supports it is defeated at the poils. I would rather donate all my savings to
ensure defeat of people who would consider such legislation than to have it taken by those same
corrupt politicians!!!

NO, NO, NO, NO, NO!!! TO THIS LEGISLATION.

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 4/12/2010