alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 534.7 Situations not directly addressed by this part.

To the extent that this part does not directly address an issue concerning the rights and responsibilities of manufacturers in the context of a change in corporate relationships, the agency will make determinations based on interpretation of the statute and the principles reflected in the part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          10,937
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,483
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,203
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,203
<PP&E>                                           9,449
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,228
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,412
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,641
<BONDS>                                          1,432
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,787
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,027
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,412
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               233,858
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  163,272
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,261
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 163
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,162
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,930
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,232
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,232
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.66
        

</TABLE>
----

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

2,00 % on 1 June 2004

Euro exchange rates (2)

2 June 2004

(2004/C 148/02)

1 euro= 

----

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
§ 826.7 Rulemaking on maximum rates for attorney fees. ( a ) In addition to increases based on cost of living (*see* § 826.6), attorney fees in some or all of the proceedings covered by this part may also be increased beyond the statutory cap of $75 if warranted by special factors (such as limited availability of attorneys qualified to handle certain types of proceedings). The Board will conduct any rulemaking proceedings for this purpose under the informal rulemaking procedures of the Administrative Procedure Act.
( b ) Any person may file with the Board a petition for rulemaking to increase the maximum rate for attorney fees by demonstrating that a special factor(s) justifies a higher fee. The petition shall identify the rate the petitioner believes the Board should establish and the proceeding(s) or types of proceedings in which the rate should be used. It should also explain fully the reasons why the higher rate is warranted. The Board will respond to the petition within 60 days after it is filed, by initiating a rulemaking proceeding, denying the petition, or taking other appropriate action.
[58 FR 21545, Apr. 22, 1993]
§ 1.210 Applicability to Federal agencies and others. ( a ) This subtitle contains guidance that directly applies only to Federal agencies.
( b ) The guidance in this subtitle may affect other entities through each Federal agency's implementation of the guidance, portions of which may apply to: ( 1 ) The agency's awarding or administering officials;
( 2 ) Recipients and subrecipients that receive or apply for the agency's Federal financial assistance or receive subawards under grants or cooperative agreements; or
( 3 ) Any other entities involved in agency transactions subject to the guidance in this chapter.
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of South Jersey
Gas Company (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Edward J. Graham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
Edward J. Graham


-----------------------------------------------------


Name:  Edward
J. Graham


Title:  Chief
Executive Officer


May 12,
2009
§ 510.2 Definitions. ( a ) *NHTSA* means the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
( b ) *Administrator* means the Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
( c ) *Chief Counsel* means the Chief Counsel of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
( d ) *Deputy Administrator* means the Deputy Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
( e ) *Person* includes agents, officers, and employees of sole proprietorships, partnerships, corporations, and other entities.
[45 FR 29042, May 1, 1980; 45 FR 32001, May 15, 1980]
##### 



Exhibit 32.A CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2004,
of El Paso CGP Company (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas L. Foshee, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify
(i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Douglas L. FosheeDouglas L. FosheeChairman of the Board,President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
November 29, 2005 A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
El Paso
CGP Company and will be retained by El Paso CGP Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 43

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Energy and

Commerce in the One Hundred Seventh Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 14, 2001

Mr. TAUZIN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on

Energy and Commerce in the One Hundred Seventh

Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Energy and

4 Commerce (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the

5 ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries,

6 there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the

7 House of Representatives for committee salaries and ex8 penses, not more than $18,813,475 for the One Hundred

9 Seventh Congress.
2

•HRES 43 IH

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

2 Of the amount specified in section 1—

3 (1) not more than $8,938,911.40 shall be avail4 able for expenses incurred during the period begin5 ning at noon on January 3, 2001, and ending imme6 diately before noon on January 3, 2002; and

7 (2) not more than $9,874,563.60 shall be avail8 able for expenses incurred during the period begin9 ning at noon on January 3, 2002, and ending imme10 diately before noon on January 3, 2003.

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration.

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by

19 the Committee on House Administration.

Æ
EXHIBIT 31.2



Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Alisha K. Charlton, Chief Accounting Officer of Comarco, Inc., certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Comarco, Inc.;
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Date: May 31, 2013
/s/ ALISHA K. CHARLTONAlisha K. CharltonChief Accounting Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
§ 601.34 Petitions for reconsideration. ( a ) Any interested person may petition the Administrator for reconsideration of a final rule issued under this part. The petition must be in English and submitted in duplicate to the Administrator, Federal Transit Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, 20590, and received not later than thirty (30) days after publication of the final rule in the Federal Register. Petitions filed after that time will be considered as petitions filed under § 601.32. The petition must contain a brief statement of the complaint and an explanation as to why compliance with the final rule is not practicable, is unreasonable, or is not in the public interest.
( b ) If the petitioner requests the consideration of additional facts, he/she must state the reason the facts were not presented to the Administrator within the prescribed comment period of the rulemaking.
( c ) The Administrator does not consider repetitious petitions.
( d ) Unless the Administrator otherwise provides, the filing of a petition under this section does not stay the effectiveness of the final rule.
# May 26: Military airstrikes continue against ISIS terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published May 26, 2017
May 26, 201720170526-02**SOUTHWEST ASIA —**
----

Call for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area’

(2004/C 158/06)

----

(1)OJ L 232, 29.8.2002, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 294, 29.10.2002, p. 1.

(3)  Commission Decision C(2002)4789, as modified by C(2003)577, C(2003)955, C(2003)1952, C(2003)3543, C(2003)3555, C(2003)4609, C(2003)5183, C(2004)433, and C(2004)2002., all decisions unpublished.

(4)OJ L 355, 30.12.2002, p. 23.

(5)OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

(6)OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 1.

(7)  C(2003)883 of 27 March 2003, as last modified by C(2004)1855 of 18 May 2004.

(8)  The EPSS is a tool to assist proposers to develop and submit their proposals electronically.

(9)  Users of courier services that ask for the recipient's telephone number should give the following number: (32-2) 29 96206 (Ms Virginia Enache).

----

ANNEX

1.   Specific programme: Integrating and Strengthening the European Research Area.

2.   Thematic priority/domain: All thematic priority areas.

3.   Call title: Specific Support Actions (SSA) for Associated Candidate Countries.

4.   Call identifier: FP6-2004-ACC-SSA-2

5.   Date of publication: 

6.   Closure date: 14 October 2004 at 17.00 (Brussels local time).

7.   Total indicative budget: EUR 19 800 000.

8.   Area and instruments: 

9.   Minimum number of participants: 

10.   Restriction to participation: none

11.   Consortium agreement: Participants in RTD actions resulting from this call are not required to conclude a consortium agreement.

12.   Evaluation procedure: 

13.   Evaluation criteria: see Annex B of the work programme for the applicable criteria (including their individual weights and thresholds and the overall threshold) per instrument.

14.   Indicative evaluation and selection timetable: 

----

(1)  ACC: Associated candidate countries – Bulgaria, Romania and Turkey.

----
Tigris span will aid farmers, trade in Salman Pak
 By Staff Sgt. Daniel Yarnall , 103rd Public Affairs Detachment
  
 BAGHDAD (June 20, 2010) – A group of Connecticut Army National Guard engineers is working to construct a new bridge spanning the Tigris River near Salman Pak. As U.S. and Iraqi forces secure the area, the 250th Engineers’  Multi-Role Bridge Company, Connecticut ANG, is working night and day to  construct what’s called a Mabey Johnson Panel Bridge across the storied  waterway.Capt. Chuck Taylor, commander of the 250th, is  overseeing the operation. His troops are accomplishing the project by  moving equipment into place during the day, and then performing the  majority of construction at night to escape the sun’s heat.Taylor  explained that the bridge is important in this location because the  only other way for residents to get to the town of Salman Pak is to take  a three-hour detour to the next crossing.“The Salman Pak area  has really grown as far as farms and commerce,” Taylor said. “Having  this bridge in place allows the residents and farmers on this shore to  take their produce to town, sell their product and purchase the things  that they need.”In 2003, U.S. forces built an assault float  bridge at this location. However, it was designed to be temporary and  was starting to show its age, according to Taylor.He said this  area was so important to the Government of Iraq that they requested his  unit’s assistance in installing a more-permanent support bridge to  replace the float bridge.“As long as it’s properly maintained,  this Mabey Johnson Bridge will last on a site like this for many years  to come,” said Taylor.Pfc. Andrea Reynolds, an equipment  operator with the engineers, said she is proud of the work she and her  unit are doing.“It’s amazing, watching everyone and seeing what  they can do,” said Reynolds, from New Haven, Conn. “I have never seen  anything like this. Watching everyone work together to make something  that is going to make the local population have a better life is really  rewarding.”Members of the Iraqi Army who worked with the  engineers were also impressed by the speed of the project.“They  keep working. Night and day, they just keep going,” said Pvt. Nasrat  Ayad Najem, an Iraqi Soldier.“I am very amazed with how the U.S.  Soldiers are constructing the bridge, and how they are doing it so  fast,” said Pvt. Aalaa Rasul Kareemn, an IA engineer. “There must be no  better way to build a bridge.”
###### Editorial Note on Part 376

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 376 appear at 66 FR 49871, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 376.42 Lease of equipment by regulated carriers.

Authorized carriers may lease equipment and drivers from private carriers, for periods of less than 30 days, in the manner set forth in § 376.22.

[49 FR 9570, Mar. 14, 1984, as amended at 51 FR 37034, Oct. 17, 1986; 62 FR 15424, Apr. 1, 1997]
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24

- 6042

JOHN MARTIN SPAULDING
,
Petitioner

- Appellant
,

v.
J. C. STREEVAL, Warden
, Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. James P. Jones , Senior District Judge. ( 7:22

- cv

- 00118

- JPJ

- PMS )

Submitted : September 19, 2024 Decided: September 24, 2024

Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

John Martin Spaulding, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6042 Doc: 15 Filed: 09/24/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
John Martin Spaulding , a federal prisoner, appeals the district court ’ s order
dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which Spaulding sought
to challenge his convictions and sentence by way of the savings clause in 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

Pursuant to § 2255(e), a prisoner may challenge his conviction and sentence in a petition
for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to § 2241 only if a § 2255 motion would be inadequate
or ineffective to test the legality of his detention. In light of the Supreme Court ’ s decision

in Jones v. Hendrix
, 599 U.S. 465, 477

- 80 (2023) (holding that petitioner cannot use § 2241
petition to mount successive collateral attack on validity of federal conviction or sentence),

we conclude that the district court correctly determined that Spaulding cannot pursue his

claims in a § 2241 petition. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’ s order. Spaulding

v. Streeval , No. 7 :2 2

- cv

- 00 118

- JPJ

- PMS (W. D. Va. Jan. 9 , 2024). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pres ented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 24-6042 Doc: 15 Filed: 09/24/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
# Europos Sąjungos C 153A/2004

| | ISSN 1725-521X |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 153A |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir prane_imai | 47 tomas2004m. birželio 10d. |

ISSN 1725-521X

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 153A

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir prane_imai

47 tomas2004m. birželio 10d.

---

| Prane_imo Nr. | Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Pranešimai |
| | Taryba |
| 2004/C 153A/1 | Pranešimas apie laisvą darbo vietą (Nuor. A/013) | 1 |

Prane_imo Nr.

Turinys

Puslapis

III   Pranešimai

Taryba

2004/C 153A/1

Pranešimas apie laisvą darbo vietą (Nuor. A/013)

1

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

III Pranešimai

Taryba

| 10.6.2004 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | CA 153/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2004

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

CA 153/1

---

PRANEŠIMAS APIE LAISVĄ DARBO VIETĄ

(Nuor. A/013)

ADMINISTRATORIUS (-Ė)

(2004/C 153 A/01)

Bendros Europos saugumo ir gynybos politikos (BESGP) srityje Tarybos generalinis sekretoriatas E generaliniame direktorate – Išorės santykiai – VIII direktorate, kuris yra atsakingas už gynybos aspektus, ketina įdarbinti A*9 kategorijos administratorių (-ę).

Daugiau informacijos (anglų ir prancūzų kalbomis) bei prašymo formas galima gauti susisiekus el. paštu service.recrutement@consilium.eu.int su Atrankos ir įdarbinimo tarnyba arba šios tarnybos tinklalapyje adresu: http://ue.eu.int/concours.

Terminas – 2004 m. liepos 9 d., pašto antspaudas laikomas įrodymu.

---
Editorial Note on Part 393
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 393 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 393.205 Wheels. ( a ) Wheels and rims shall not be cracked or broken.
( b ) Stud or bolt holes on the wheels shall shall not be elongated (out of round).
( c ) Nuts or bolts shall not be missing or loose.
§ 825.20 Briefs in support of appeal. ( a ) Within 20 days after the filing of a notice of appeal, the appellant must file, in the same manner as prescribed for the notice in § 825.5, a brief in support of the appeal.
( b ) This document shall set forth: ( 1 ) The name and address of the appellant;
( 2 ) The number and a description of the license, certificate, document, or register involved;
( 3 ) A summary of the charges affirmed by the Commandant as proved;
( 4 ) Fact findings by the Commandant disputed by the appellant;
( 5 ) Specific statements of errors of laws asserted;
( 6 ) Specific statements of any abuse of discretion asserted; and
( 7 ) The relief requested.
( c ) Objection based upon evidence of record need not be considered unless the appeal contains specific record citation to the pertinent evidence.
( d ) When a brief has been filed by appellant under this section, the Coast Guard may, within 15 days of service of the brief on the Commandant, submit to the Board a reply brief.
( e ) If a party who has filed a notice of appeal does not perfect the appeal by the timely filing of an appeal brief, the Board may dismiss the appeal on its own initiative or on motion of the Coast Guard.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7749** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. ALFRED BUENSALIDA, a/k/a JJ , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Roger W. Titus , Senior District Judge. ( 8:11

- cr - 00061

- RWT

- 1; 8:14

- cv - 03533

- RWT )

Submitted : April 20, 2016 Decided: May 6, 2016

Before KING, GREGORY, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Alfred Buensalida, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Packard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent i n this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Alfred Buensalida seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C . § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). Wh en the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Buensalida has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 co ntentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED