```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 183 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 58352-58353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-21226]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0550; FRL-9718-2]

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, San Diego 
County, Antelope Valley and Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Agencies

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 58353]]

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the San Diego County 
Air Pollution Control District (SDCAPCD) and Monterey Bay Unified Air 
Pollution Control District (MBUAPCD) and Antelope Valley Air Quality 
Management District (AVAQMD) portions of the California State 
Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern volatile organic 
compound (VOC) emissions from coating of metal containers, closures and 
coils and from graphic arts operations and the provision of sampling 
and testing facilities required for permitting and from adhesives and 
sealant applications. We are proposing to approve local rules to 
regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 
1990 (CAA or the Act).

DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by October 22, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number R09-OAR-2012-
0550, by one of the following methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-
line instructions.
    2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
    3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 
94105-3901.
    Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket 
without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov, 
including any personal information provided, unless the comment 
includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information 
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you 
consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as 
such and should not be submitted through www.regulations.gov or email. 
www.regulations.gov is an ``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not 
know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the 
body of your comment. If you send email directly to EPA, your email 
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the 
public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical 
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be 
able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of 
special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects 
or viruses.
    Docket: Generally, documents in the docket for this action are 
available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA 
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all 
documents in the docket are listed at www.regulations.gov, some 
information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location 
(e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and some may not be publicly 
available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy 
materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours 
with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andy Steckel, EPA Region IX, (415) 
947-4115, Steckel.andrew@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal addresses the following local 
rules: SDCAPCD Rule 67.4, Metal Container, Metal Closure and Metal Coil 
Coating Operations; SDCAPCD Rule 67.16, Metal Container, Graphic Arts 
Operations; MBUAPCD Rule 205, Provision of Sampling and Testing 
Facilities and AVAQMD 1168, Adhesive and Sealant Applications. In the 
Rules and Regulations section of this Federal Register, we are 
approving these local rules in a direct final action without prior 
proposal because we believe these SIP revisions are not controversial. 
If we receive adverse comments, however, we will publish a timely 
withdrawal of the direct final rule and address the comments in 
subsequent action based on this proposed rule. Please note that if we 
receive adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this 
rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the 
rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not 
the subject of an adverse comment.
    We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone 
interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not 
receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further 
information, please see the direct final action.

    Dated: August 3, 2012.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2012-21226 Filed 9-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```