alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Mark Regan [mailto:dnoonan000@rochester.rr.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 1:25 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 in the subject line of the message

This correspondence is being in protest of any legislation to amounts to no less than stealing.

 

STOP WITH THE SOCIALISM!!!!!
# Conclusion of Exercise BRIGHT STAR 2023 in Egypt

/ Published Sept. 16, 2023

Sept 16, 2023

Release Number 20230916-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla. –** On Sept. 14, U.S. Central Command and the Egyptian Armed Forces, along with troops from 32 other nations, concluded Exercise BRIGHT STAR 2023, at Mohamed Naguib Military Base, Egypt. Approximately 8,400 troops with over 140 aircraft, 17 naval vessels, and 250 vehicles from across the globe gathered at five training locations in Egypt to participate in the largest and oldest middle eastern exercise. Established initially to build the strategic security relationship between Egypt and the United States, it has expanded to the current scope and plays a leading role in regional security.

BRIGHT STAR 2023 focused on promoting coalition interoperability throughout the full range of military operations through multinational and multi-domain training exercises such as:

· Combined Arms Maneuver Live Fire Exercise

· Maritime Security

· Integrated Air and Missile Defense

· Amphibious Assault Operations

· Airborne Assault Operations

· Counterterrorism

· Joint Tactical Air Control

· Cyber Security Operations

· Planning/Executing Joint Military Operations on Tactical and Operational Levels

· Common Air Operations

· Integrated Maneuver Units

· Border Control

“Since 1980, BRIGHT STAR has been an example of our enduring commitment to regional security and increasing interoperability with our partners,” said Gen. Michael “Erik” Kurilla, commander of U.S. Central Command. “The quality and variety of training opportunities in a multinational venue with 34 nations demonstrates the value of BRIGHT STAR. Bringing this many nations, people, equipment, and experiences is also a testament to Egypt’s leadership in the region. The culmination Combined Army Live Fire Exercise is an example of interoperability with troops and equipment, including 70 armored vehicles, fixed and rotary wing attack aviation, artillery, engineers and air defense from multiple militaries integrated into one formation. Given the increasing complexity of the threats in the region, it is more important now than ever that we are fully integrated with our partners and allies.”
#### § 591.3 Applicability.

This part applies to any person offering a motor vehicle or item of motor vehicle equipment for importation into the United States.

[55 FR 11378, Mar. 28, 1990]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,026
<SECURITIES>                                    24,948
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,451
<ALLOWANCES>                                       310
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,115
<PP&E>                                           1,823
<DEPRECIATION>                                     394
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,544
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,223
<BONDS>                                         36,903
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,890
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            57
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,471
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,544
<SALES>                                          6,877
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,877
<CGS>                                            2,468
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,468
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   294
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,653
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,462
<INCOME-TAX>                                       883
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,579
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,579
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
        

</TABLE>
§ 800.4 Operation. In exercising its functions, duties, and responsibilities, the Board utilizes: ( a ) The Board's staff, consisting of specialized offices dealing with particular areas of transportation safety and performing administrative and technical work for the Board. The staff advises the Board and performs duties for the Board that are inherent in the staff's position in the organizational structure or that the Board has delegated to it. The staff is described more fully in § 800.2.
( b ) Rules published in the Federal Register and codified in this Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations. These rules may be inspected in the Board's public reference room, or purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, Government Publishing Office.
( c ) Procedures and policies set forth in the agency's internal directives system which govern the activities of employees and organizational components of the Board. The internal directives system is designated as the NTSB Manual and consists of instructions which are called NTSB Orders and NTSB Notices.
( d ) Meetings of the Board Members conducted pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act.
( e ) Public hearings in connection with transportation accident investigations and public hearings and oral arguments in proceedings concerned with certificates or licenses issued by the Secretary or an Administrator of the Department of Transportation or the Commandant of the United States Coast Guard. They are held at the time and place announced in the notices thereof which are served on the parties to the proceedings or published in the Federal Register.
[49 FR 26232, June 27, 1984, as amended at 60 FR 61489, Nov. 30, 1995; 81 FR 75730, Nov. 1, 2016]
-----Original Message----- 

From: Lois Consiglio [mailto:sig9447@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 7:01 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: comment on RIN 1210-AB33 

I have review this document and I have only one comment to make and 

that is keep your hands off my money. I have worked and saved this 

money and will do with it what I wish, I don't need and I don't want 

the governments "help" in this matter. 

Butt out! 

Sincerely 

Lois Consiglio 

Tamarac, FL.
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 41986X0724

**Resolution of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, of 14 July 1986 supplementary to the resolutions of 23 June 1981 and 30 June 1982 concerning the introduction of a passport of uniform pattern***Official Journal C 185 , 24/07/1986 P. 0001 - 0001*

RESOLUTIONof the  representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council,of 14 July  1986supplementary to the resolutions of 23 June 1981 and 30 June 1982 concerning the introduction  of a passport of uniform pattern(86/C 185/01)

THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE  MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, MEETING WITHIN THE COUNCIL, Recalling that in their  resolutions of 23 June 1981 (1) and 30 June 1982 (2) they had drawn up a passport of uniform format  and scope which they had resolved to endeavour to issue by 1 January 1985 at the latest;  Considering that the new Member States must also endeavour to issue the passport without delay  after their accession to the Community; Considering that the necessary linguistic adjustments  should be made in order to take account of the accession, HAVE AGREED: 1. that the Kingdom of Spain  and the Portuguese Republic will endeavour to issue the passport by 1 January 1989 at the latest,  in accordance with the format and scope specified in the aforementioned resolutions as amended by  this resolution; 2. that the information referred to in points C, D, the first indent of the third  subparagraph of E, and points, G, H and I of Annex I to the resolution of 23 June 1981 will also be  given in Portuguese and Spanish in accordance with the provisions of that resolution with regard to  the other official languages of the Community; the Member States will take account of these  linguistic adjustments as and when new stocks of passports are printed - and by 1 January 1989 at  the latest. (1) OJ No C 241, 19. 9. 1981, p. 1.

 (2) OJ No C 179, 16. 7. 1982, p. 1.
| e*Literacy Newsletter -- Vol. 2 Issue 7

2002January, February, March, April, August, September, November2001September, October, November,  December

e*Literacy is published by the National Institute for Literacy.  The National Institute for Literacy is an independent federal organization leading the national effort toward a fully literate nation in the 21st century. The Institute's mission is to improve the national adult literacy system by building capacity and improving quality through strategic public-private partnerships at the state, regional, and national level.

**Editor:**  Lynn Reddy (lreddy@nifl.gov)

**For more information, contact:**National Institute for Literacy1775 I Street, NW; Suite 730Washington, DC  20006-2417202-233-2025
**NIFL Newsletters from previous years**Fall 1997 -- Spring 1997Fall 1996 -- Spring 1996December 1995 -- September 1995 -- May 1995 -- January 1995October 1994 -- July 1994 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 533.4 Definitions. ( a ) *Statutory terms.* ( 1 ) The terms *average fuel economy, average fuel economy standard, fuel economy, import, manufacture, manufacturer,* and *model year* are used as defined in 49 U.S.C. 32901.
( 2 ) The term *automobile* is used as defined in 49 U.S.C. 32901 and in accordance with the determinations in part 523 of this chapter.
( b ) *Other terms.* As used in this part, unless otherwise required by the context— ( 1 ) *Light truck* is used in accordance with the determinations in part 523 of this chapter.
( 2 ) *Captive import* means with respect to a light truck, one which is not domestically manufactured, as defined in section 502(b)(2)(E) of the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act, but which is imported in the 1980 model year or thereafter by a manufacturer whose principal place of business is in the United States.
( 3 ) *4-wheel drive, general utility vehicle* means a 4-wheel drive, general purpose automobile capable of off-highway operation that has a wheelbase of not more than 280 centimeters, and that has a body shape similar to 1977 Jeep CJ-5 or CJ-7, or the 1977 Toyota Land Cruiser.
( 4 ) *Basic engine* means a unique combination of manufacturer, engine displacement, number of cylinders, fuel system (as distinguished by number of carburetor barrels or use of fuel injection), and catalyst usage.
( 5 ) *Limited product line light truck* means a light truck manufactured by a manufacturer whose light truck fleet is powered exclusively by basic engines which are not also used in passenger automobiles.
[89 FR 52949, June 24, 2024]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-4746

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JIMMIE ALLEN JONES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District

Judge. (CR-95-20)

Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 1, 2000

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David W. Frame, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. Melvin

W. Kahle, Jr., United States Attorney, Thomas O. Mucklow, Assistant

United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jimmie Allen Jones appeals the judgment order of the district

court sentencing him to three-years’ imprisonment based on Jones’

violation of his supervised release terms. Jones claims that the

court relied on improper hearsay evidence and that its findings

were not supported by a preponderance of the evidence. Our independent review of the record reveals no error. Accordingly, we

affirm the judgment order of the district court. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
H. Res. 412

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 7, 2002.

Whereas since the terrorist attacks on the United States on

September 11, 2001, the Government and people of Canada have offered their steadfast support to the United

States in the international war against terrorism;

Whereas this support is in defense of the values that define

and unite the United States and Canada;

Whereas the Government of Canada has also provided significant military support to the international war against

terrorism, first deploying troops to Afghanistan in October 2001;

Whereas on January 7, 2002, the Government of Canada announced it would be sending an additional 750 troops to

Afghanistan from the 3rd Battalion of the Princess

Patricia’s Canadian Light Infantry Battle Group to support the coalition against terrorism;

Whereas on April 17, 2002, 4 Canadian soldiers from that

battalion were killed and 8 others were wounded in a

friendly-fire incident in southern Afghanistan;

Whereas the Canadian soldiers who lost their lives were Sergeant Marc D. Leger of Lancaster, Ontario, Corporal

Ainsworth Dyer of Montreal, Quebec, Private Richard A.
2

•HRES 412 EH

Green of Edmonton, Alberta, and Private Nathan Smith

of Tatamagouche, Nova Scotia;

Whereas the people of the United States value the friendship

and goodwill of the people of Canada; and

Whereas President Bush has offered his sorrow and sympathy to the Government and people of Canada for this

tragedy: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) praises the performance and heroism of Canadian soldiers;

(2) extends its regret and sympathy to the families

of the 4 Canadian soldiers who lost their lives and others

who suffered injury on April 17, 2002, in a friendly-fire

incident in southern Afghanistan, and to the Government and people of Canada for their loss; and

(3) reaffirms the Nation’s appreciation for Canada’s

strong support and commitment to the war against terrorism.

Attest:

Clerk.
Grafton,

Dec., 1899.

#### Sanders *v.*Strafford Paper Co.

Case, for personal injuries. Trial by jury and verdict for the-plaintiff. The defendants seasonably moved for a nonsuit and that a verdict be directed in their favor. Both motions were denied, and the defendants excepted.

*Streeter, Walker Hollis*and *Albert S. Batchellor,*for the plaintiff.

*Burleigh Adams*and *Worcester, G-afney*¿f *Snow,*for the defendants.

Blodgett, C. J.

The legal principles applicable to and governing cases of this character have been so repeatedly stated in recent decisions of the court that no occasion exists for their- restatement at the present time.

The plaintiff’s ground of action is that the defendants carelessly and negligently failed to furnish a reasonably safe place and reasonably safe machinery and appliances for the performance of his work as their servant, and that in consequence thereof, and while he was in the exercise of proper care, he received the injuries complained of. To all of these allegations the defendants pleaded not guilty.

Upon the issues thus presented, competent evidence was introduced by both parties, and upon its careful consideration we are unable to hold, as matter of law, that the plaintiff’s injuries resulted from a “seen danger, or from one within the scope which both parties contemplated as incident to the service, or which the plaintiff, from his knowledge of the situation, reasonably ought to have anticipated” *(Quimby*v. *Railroad,*69 N. H. 334); nor can we say judicially that the evidence before the jury was insufficient to justify the verdict.

*Exceptions overruled.*

Pike, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6971
MICHAEL CAUGHMAN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus LAURIE F. BESSINGER, Warden; CHARLES M. CONDON, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-3644-3-20BC) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 26, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Caughman, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Lauri J. Soles, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Michael Caughman seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Caughman v. Bessinger , No. CA-96- 3644-3-20BC (D.S.C. June 26, 1997). We also deny Caughman's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
###### Editorial Note on Part 801

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 801 appear at 86 FR 54641, Oct. 4, 2021.

#### § 801.11 Segregability of records.

The initial decision of the FOIA Officer will include a determination of segregability. If it is reasonable to do so, the exempt portions of a record will be segregated and, where necessary, redacted, and the nonexempt portions will be sent to the requester.
# Milley Begins Fact-Finding Trip to Middle East, Central Asia

/ Published Nov. 24, 2019

The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff arrived at Amman, Jordan today to begin a trip to the Middle East and Central Asia.

On his way to Jordan, Army Gen. Mark A. Milley stopped in Israel to meet his counterpart, Israeli Army Lt. Gen. Aviv Kochavi. After the visit, he made the short flight here and met with King Abdallah II – who is the commander-in-chief of the Jordanian military. 

Milley was hosted by Jordanian Army Maj. Gen. Yousef Huneiti, Jordan's chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Milley will meet with military and civilian leaders in the region and will visit with U.S. troops.

''This is an opportunity for the chairman to meet face-to-face with military leaders in the theater to discuss the strategic situation and reaffirm our commitment to the region,'' said Air Force Col. DeDe S. Halfhill, the special assistant to the chairman for public affairs. ''It also affords him a chance to meet with U.S. service members to see how they are doing, and find out their concerns and thank them for all they are doing to keep America safe.''

It is Milley's first trip to the region since becoming chairman last month. He has deployed to the region many times in his 40-year career and visited often in his previous job as Army chief of staff.

The situation in the region is complicated, to say the least. Just since Milley took office, Turkey moved into a band of Northern Syria 30 kilometers wide. The U.S. redeployed forces area to protect Syrian oil fields from exploitation by Islamic State adherents. 

In the Persian Gulf, Iran moved beyond mining oil tankers and shooting down a U.S. remotely piloted vehicle, to attacking a crucial oil terminal in Saudi Arabia. The United States is sending troops and military capabilities to assure Persian Gulf allies and deter Iran from further attacks.

The United States is working to train and advise Iraqi defense forces and Syrian Democratic Forces. U.S. and coalition personnel are also working with Afghan security forces. There are between 50,000 and 60,000 U.S. service members serving in the U.S. Central Command.

For more Joint Staff news, visit: www.jcs.mil.Connect with the Joint Staff on social media: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube,LinkedIn and Flickr.
#### § 821.2 Applicability and description of part.

The provisions of this part govern all air safety proceedings, including proceedings before a law judge on petition for review of the denial of any airman certificate (including a medical certificate), or on appeal from any order of the Administrator amending, modifying, suspending or revoking a certificate. The provisions of this part also govern all proceedings on appeal from an order of the Administrator imposing a civil penalty on a flight engineer, mechanic, pilot or repairman, or a person acting in such capacity. All proceedings on appeal to the Board from any initial decision or order of a law judge are also governed by this part.