alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUIS RIVERA-TORRES,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-72073

Agency No. A077-983-677

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 12, 2011** 

Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

Luis Rivera-Torres, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding

of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

FILED

JUL 21 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-72073

substantial evidence factual findings. Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056

(9th Cir. 2009). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Rivera-Torres does not challenge the agency’s dispositive finding that his

asylum application is time-barred. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256,

1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s

opening brief are waived).

The record does not compel the conclusion that the childhood sexual

molestation Rivera-Torres suffered or the harm he fears was or will be on account

of a protected ground. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 n.1 (1992) (to

reverse the agency’s finding, “we must find that the evidence not only supports

that conclusion, but compels it”) (emphasis in original); Parussimova v. Mukasey,

555 F.3d 734, 740 (9th Cir. 2009) (“[t]he Real ID Act requires that a protected

ground represent ‘one central reason’ for an asylum applicant’s persecution”). 

Accordingly, Rivera-Torres’s withholding of removal claim fails.

Finally, we lack jurisdiction to review Rivera-Torres’s contention that there

is a pattern of violence against children in Mexico because he did not raise this

claim to the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004) (no

jurisdiction over claims not presented below). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
§ 835.3 Scope of permissible testimony. ( a ) Section 701(e) of the FA Act and section 304(c) of the Safety Act preclude the use or admission into evidence of Board accident reports in any suit or action for damages arising from accidents. These sections reflect Congress' “strong * * * desire to keep the Board free of the entanglement of such suits.” Rep. No. 93-1192, 93d Cong., 2d Sess., 44 (1974), and serve to ensure that the Board does not exert an undue influence on litigation. The purposes of these sections would be defeated if expert opinion testimony of Board employees, which may be reflected in the views of the Board expressed in its reports, were admitted in evidence or used in litigation arising out of an accident. The Board relies heavily upon its investigators' opinions in its deliberations. Furthermore, the use of Board employees as experts to give opinion testimony would impose a significant administrative burden on the Board's investigative staff. Litigants must obtain their expert witnesses from other sources.
( b ) For the reasons stated in paragraph (a) of this section and § 835.1, Board employees may only testify as to the factual information they obtained during the course of an investigation, including factual evaluations embodied in their factual accident reports. However, they shall decline to testify regarding matters beyond the scope of their investigation, and they shall not give any expert or opinion testimony.
( c ) Board employees may testify about the firsthand information they obtained during an investigation that is not reasonably available elsewhere, including observations recorded in their own factual accident reports. Consistent with the principles cited in § 835.1 and this section, current Board employees are not authorized to testify regarding other employee's reports, or other types of Board documents, including but not limited to safety recommendations, safety studies, safety proposals, safety accomplishments, reports labeled studies, and analysis reports, as they contain staff analysis and/or Board conclusions.
( d ) Briefs of accidents may be released in conjunction with factual accident reports. Nevertheless, they are not part of those reports and are not to be admitted in evidence or used in a deposition approved under this part.
( e ) Not all material in a factual accident report may be the subject of testimony. The purpose of the factual accident report, in great part, is to inform the public at large, and as a result the factual accident report may contain information and conclusions for which testimony is prohibited by this part.
( f ) No employee may testify in any matter absent advance approval by the General Counsel as provided in this part.
[55 FR 41541, Oct. 12, 1990, as amended at 63 FR 71607, Dec. 29, 1998; 64 FR 5622, Feb. 4, 1999]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CARLOS RAMON MATOS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 91 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2nd day of August, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 164 (Friday, August 25, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 58288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18377]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Infrastructure Advancement for Interdisciplinary Elderly 
Studies
    Date: November 2, 2023.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Bita Nakhai, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room: 2C212, Bethesda, MD 28092, 301-402-7701, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0668676d6e676f6446686f6728686f6e28616970"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d0beb1bbb8b1b9b290beb9b1febeb9b8feb7bfa6">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 21, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-18377 Filed 8-24-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Wounded U.S. veteran receives Canadian award
 By Sgt. Fredrick Coleman , CENTCOM Public Affairs
  U.S. Army Master Sgt. Richard Cicero earned a Canadian Chief of Defence Staff Commendation medal for his actions in Afghanistan which resulted in saving the life of a Canadian troop during an improvised explosive device attack in July 2010. (USCENTCOM photo by Sgt. Fredrick J. Coleman, USMC)
 MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. – Retired U.S. Army Master. Sgt. Richard Cicero received a Canadian Chief of Defence Staff Commendation medal during a ceremony presided over by Marine Maj. Gen. William Beydler, director of U.S. Central Command’s Plans and Policies Directorate, and Canadian Defence Forces Col. Paul Keddy, Canadian senior national representative to USCENTCOM, here July 23. “It’s a unique privilege to be asked by our Chief of Defence Staff in Canada to extend our nation’s deepest appreciation to Richard Cicero,” said Keddy. Cicero, who served as a military contractor working with improvised explosive device detection dogs, earned the award for his actions during his deployment to Afghanistan in 2010 when he saved an injured Canadian soldier. Despite enemy fire, Cicero took life-saving steps to care for the Canadian soldier who lost his leg in the blast and then secure the landing zone for the casualty evacuation. Cicero later lost his right arm and leg in a separate IED blast. “You’re brothers in arms of the Oscar Company Combat Team and especially the Combat Engineers of Echo 33D thank you for your brave and selfless actions on July 31, 2010. Your tenacity in the face of the enemy and unwavering loyalty to a teammate in his time of need are a credit to you and in keeping with the military traditions of both our countries,” said his Canadian section commander in a quote read by Keddy during the ceremony. Cicero credits his training which taught him to respond in dangerous situations. “To me, the word ‘hero’ is overdone. To me, I will always just be ‘doing my job’ during this time,” said Cicero. “To be recognized for those actions is an overwhelming honor to be up here today receiving this award.  I’m up here today to make sure the folks who do this job every day are recognized for what they are doing because so often they aren’t.” Cicero, a Weeki Wachee, Fla., resident worked as the senior canine trainer for the Virginia State Police Department following his retirement from the Army.  He became a military contractor in 2007. Cicero currently serves as a volunteer with the Wounded Warrior Program at the Tampa Veterans Affairs hospital.
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 Nos. 333-81436 and 333-109053 and Form S-4/A No. 333-36375) of Artesyn Technologies, Inc.
and in the related Prospectus, and in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-42516,
33-63501, 333-08475, 333-58771, 333-85225, 333-59382, 333-102854, 333-119942, and 333-119953)
pertaining to the Artesyn Technologies, Inc. 1990 and 2000 Performance Equity Plans, 1990 Outside
Director Stock Option Plan, Employees Tax-Favored Thrift and Savings Plan, and certain other
options, of our reports dated March 15, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of Artesyn Technologies, Inc., Artesyn Technologies, Inc. managements assessment of
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting of Artesyn Technologies, Inc., included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Certified Public Accountants West Palm Beach, Florida
March 15, 2005
Exhibit 31-7



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) OF THE

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



I,
Denis P. OBrien, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of PECO Energy Company; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                                                    
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 18, 2009 |  | /s/    DENIS P.
OBRIEN                                            
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)



65
JUSTIN De JUAN WALKER

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 3020

_____ ______________________/

Opinion filed October 1, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Jackson County

. William L. Wright , Judge

.

Justin De J uan Walker, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., THOMAS and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 334 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 120
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 334

                          [Report No. 107-354]

 Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 1762) to amend the Higher 
Education Act of 1965 to establish fixed interest rates for student and 
    parent borrowers, to extend current law with respect to special 
            allowances for lenders, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 23, 2002

    Ms. Pryce, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 1762) to amend the Higher 
Education Act of 1965 to establish fixed interest rates for student and 
    parent borrowers, to extend current law with respect to special 
            allowances for lenders, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (S. 1762) to amend the Higher 
Education Act of 1965 to establish fixed interest rates for student and 
parent borrowers, to extend current law with respect to special 
allowances for lenders, and for other purposes. The bill shall be 
considered as read for amendment. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening 
motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on Education and the Workforce; and (2) one motion to commit.

                                                 House Calendar No. 120

107th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 334

                          [Report No. 107-354]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 1762) to amend the Higher 
Education Act of 1965 to establish fixed interest rates for student and 
    parent borrowers, to extend current law with respect to special 
            allowances for lenders, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 23, 2002

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsUse of unbalanced laminates as a screening method for microcrackingState-of-the-art, high temperature polyimide matrix composites, reinforced with continuous graphite fibers are known to be susceptible to intraply cracking when thermally cycled over their useful service temperature range. It is believed that the transply cracking, in part, results from residual stresses caused by differences in coefficients of thermal expansion (CTE) between the polymer matrix and the reinforcement. Thermal cycling tests to investigate this phenomenon involve expensive time and energy consuming programs which are not economically feasible for use as a part of a materials screening process. As an alternative to thermal cycling studies, a study of unbalanced crossply graphite fiber reinforcement composites was conducted to assess the effect of the composite ply layup and surface condition on the residual stresses that remain after the processing of these materials. The residual stresses were assessed by measuring the radii of curvature of the types of laminates that were studied. The temperature at which stress-free conditions existed were determined and a dye penetrant method was used to observe surface damage resulting from excessive residual stress buildup. These results are compared with some published results of thermal cycling tests that were previously conducted on balanced polyimide composites.Document ID19900011808Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsPapadopoulos, Demetrios S.*(Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, OH., United States)*Bowles, Kenneth J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryComposite MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-102517NAS 1.15:102517E-5214Meeting InformationMeeting: International SAMPE SymposiumLocation: Anaheim, CACountry: United StatesStart Date: April 2, 1990End Date: April 5, 1990Accession Number90N21124Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 510-01-0ADistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900011808.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 800.24 Delegation to the General Counsel. The Board delegates to the General Counsel the authority to: ( a ) Approve, disapprove, request more information, or otherwise handle requests for testimony of Board employees with respect to their participation in the investigation of accidents, and, upon receipt of notice that an employee has been subpoenaed, to make arrangements with the court either to have the employee excused from testifying or to give the employee permission to testify in accordance with the provisions of Part 835 of this Chapter.
( b ) Approve or disapprove in safety enforcement proceedings, for good cause shown, requests for extensions of time or for other changes in procedural requirements subsequent to the initial decision, grant or deny requests to file additional and/or *amicus* briefs pursuant to §§ 821.9 and 821.48 of this Chapter, and raise on appeal any issue the resolution of which he deems important to the proper disposition of proceedings under § 821.49 of this Chapter.
( c ) Approve or disapprove, for good cause shown, requests to extend the time for filing comments on proposed new or amended regulations.
( d ) Issue regulations for the purpose of making editorial changes or corrections in the Board's rules and regulations.
( e ) Issue orders staying or declining to stay, pending judicial review, orders of the Board suspending or revoking certificates, and consent to the entry of judicial stays with respect to such orders.
( f ) Compromise civil penalties in the case of violations arising under 49 U.S.C. chapter 11, subchapter IV, or any rule, regulation, or order issued thereunder.
( g ) Issue orders dismissing appeals from initial decisions of Board administrative law judges pursuant to the request of the appellant or, where the request is consensual, at the request of any party.
( h ) Correct Board orders by eliminating typographical, grammatical, and similar errors, and make editorial changes therein not involving matters of substance.
( i ) Take such action as appropriate or necessary adequately to compromise, settle, or otherwise represent the Board's interest in judicial or administrative actions to which the Board is a party or in which the Board is interested.
( j ) Dismiss late filed notices of appeal and appeal briefs for lack of good cause.
[60 FR 61489, Nov. 30, 1995, as amended at 63 FR 71606, Dec. 29, 1998; 81 FR 75731, Nov. 1, 2016]
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ NADER ASGHARI

- KAMRANI, KAMRAN ASGH ARI

KAMRANI, Appellants

v.
UNITED SERVICES AUTO MOBILE ASSOCIATION, Appellee

______________________

2018

- 1040, 2018

- 1041

______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trad emark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No s
. CBM2016

- 00063, CBM2016

- 00064.

______________________ SUA SPONTE

______________________ Before D YK , W ALLACH , and H UGHES , Circuit Judges. P ER C URIAM

. O R D E R Upon consideration of the above

- captioned appeal s, I T I S O RDERED T HAT :ASGHARI

- KAMRANI v. UNITED SERVICES AUTO MOBILE 2

(1) These a ppeals (No s. 2018

- 1040 and 2018

- 1041) are dismissed as moot , and the decisions of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board are vacated in view of our affi rmance of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia’s judgment of patent ineligibility in Asghari

- Kamrani v. United Services Aut omobile Ass’n , Appeal No s. 2016

- 2415, 2017

- 2101 , and 2017

- 2191 , and the parties’ agreement at oral argument that affirmance of the district court’ s i neligibility decision has the effect of invalidating all claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,266,4 32

. (2) No costs. F OR THE C OURT September 11 , 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

.
# November 24: Military airstrikes continue against ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published Nov. 24, 2016
20161124-01**SOUTHWEST ASIA —**** Syria**** Iraq**
POWER OF ATTORNEY
 FOR EXECUTION OF ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR
FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010
     /s/ Laurie J. Breininger
    
    /s/ John F. MeierLaurie J. Breininger
    
    John F. Meier/s/ Steven M. Chapman
    
    /s/ John H. ShueySteven M. Chapman
    
    John H. Shuey/s/ Thomas P. Capo
    
    /s/ Richard L. WamboldThomas P. Capo
    
    Richard L. Wambold/s/ John J. Holland
    
    /s/ Robert D. WeldingJohn J. Holland
    
    Robert D. Welding
 - 1 -