alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Preece v. Preece.

(Decided May 18, 1920.)

Appeal from Martin Circuit Court.

Divorce — Alimony—Cruel and Inhuman Treatment — Evidence1— Sufficiency. — Where the wife’s evidence showed that her husband utterly neglected her and her child, that he boasted to her of his conquests of other women, that he falsely accused her of having illicit relations with other men, that he abused, threatened and struck her, and was also guilty of many other acts of cruelty, she was entitled to a divorce and aliimony.

M. C. KIRK, J. B. CLARK and A. J. KIRK for appellant

JAS. FENLEY for appellee.

Opinion op the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Reversing.

Mattie Preece brought; suit against ber husband, W. II. Preece, for divorce and alimony, and for the maintenance of their infant child. The grounds relied on were abandonment for- one year, and such cruel and inhuman treatment for not less than six months as indicated a settled aversion to her. The defendant filed an answer and counterclaim denying the allegations of the petition, and asked for a divorce on the ground that plaintiff had been guilty of such lewd and lascivious conduct as showed her .to be unchaste. A divorce was granted, but the judgment does not show whether it was on the petition of plaintiff, or the answer and counterclaim of the defendant. Alimony was denied, but the defendant was required to pay plaintiff the sum of $30.00 for the support of the child. Plaintiff’s attorneys were allowed a fee of $50.00, which was taxed as costs against the defendant. Contending that alimony was improperly denied, and that the fee allowed her attorneys was not commensurate with the work which they performed, plaintiff appealsl

A careful consideration of the evidence, which we deem it unnecessary to set out at length, convinces us *204that the charge of lewd and lascivious behavior on the part of plaintiff was not sustained, and that the separation was not due to the fault of plaintiff. On the other hand, the evidence shows that the defendant neglected his wife and child in every way, that he boasted to her of his conquests of other women, that on several occasions he falsely charged her with having illicit relations with other men, that he abused, threatened and struck her, and was also guilty of many other acts of cruelty. Upon this evidence plaintiff was entitled to a divorce and alimony in the sum of $500.00, Rogers v. Rogers, 13 Ky. L. Rep. 526, 17 S. W. 573; Barlow v. Barlow, 28 Ky. L. Rep. 664, 90 S. W. 216, though a la'rger allowance should have been made had the defendant’s financial condition permitted it.

We also conclude that the 'allowance of only $30.00 for the support of the child was wholly insufficient. The defendant should have been required to pay plaintiff the sum of $15.00 a month for that purpose.

We are further of the opinion that the fee allowed plaintiff’s attorneys was too small. Considering the character, extent and result of their labors, a fee of $100.00 instead of $50.00 should have been allowed.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded with directions to enter judgment in conformity with this opinion.
From: Kim Catacutan [mailto:kim_catacutan@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2010 5:03 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

To whom it may concern: 

 

I am completely opposed to any government interference, takeover, or management of 

personal retirement accounts like 401(k)s. 

The government has shown that it is incapable of managing its own finances (i.e., 

taxpayers' money). Any government interference with 401(k)s would be another way to 

steal the hard-earned money of responsible Americans, so that politicians could spend it 

on more unsuccessful and wasteful programs. That would be morally grotesque -- and 

grind the economy to a halt. 

Please respect our property rights and keep the politicians' hands off our retirement 

savings. 

Sincerely, 

 

Kim Catacutan 

U.S. Citizen
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

VIRNETX INC., Appellant

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee

______________________

2019

- 1043

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,746.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

S TEPHEN B LAKE K INNAIRD

, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by

N AVEEN M ODI

, J OSEPH P ALYS

, I GOR V ICTOR T IMOFEYEV

, M ICHAEL W OLFE

, D ANIEL Z EILBERGER

.

A NDREW S. E HMKE

, Haynes & Boone, LLP, Dallas, TX, argued for appellee. Also repres ented by D AVID L.

M C C OMBS

, T HEODORE M. F OSTER

, D EBRA J ANECE
M C C OMAS

.

______________________T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN

, L OURIE

, and S CHALL

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

January 21, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 511

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that funding should

be made available from the Highway Trust Fund to encourage States

to require law enforcement officers to impound motor vehicles of those

charged with driving while intoxicated and to issue responsibility warnings to those who take custody of suspects of driving while intoxicated.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 26, 2002

Mr. LOBIONDO submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

funding should be made available from the Highway

Trust Fund to encourage States to require law enforcement officers to impound motor vehicles of those charged

with driving while intoxicated and to issue responsibility

warnings to those who take custody of suspects of driving

while intoxicated.

Whereas Navy Ensign John R. Elliott, 22, of Egg Harbor

Township, New Jersey, was killed by a drunk driver on

July 22, 2000;

Whereas the drunk driver had been arrested by the New Jersey State Police earlier in the evening and, after following

all processing and charging procedures, was released by
2

•HRES 511 IH

the State Police to the custody of an adult acquaintance

of the drunk driver; and

Whereas the adult acquaintance subsequently allowed the

drunk driver to get back into his vehicle and drive away

resulting ultimately in the crash that killed John R. Elliott, the drunk driver, and seriously injured a female

passenger in John R. Elliott’s vehicle: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that funding should be made available from

3 the Highway Trust Fund to encourage States to require

4 law enforcement officers to impound motor vehicles of in5 dividuals charged with operating a motor vehicle while in6 toxicated and to issue responsibility warnings to individ7 uals who take custody of suspects of driving while intoxi8 cated.

Æ
#### § 551.47 Who may serve as an agent for a foreign manufacturer?

Only an individual, a domestic firm or a domestic corporation that is a permanent resident of the United States may serve as an agent under this subpart.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 857 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 857

                  For the relief of Romeo P. Teodoro.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2001

 Mr. Scarborough introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                  For the relief of Romeo P. Teodoro.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ROMEO P. TEODORO.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Romeo P. Teodoro shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Romeo P. Teodoro enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall 
be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Romeo P. Teodoro, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Romeo P. 
Teodoro shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
H. Res. 463

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 27, 2002.

Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on the

legislative day of Thursday, June 27, 2002, for the Speaker

to entertain motions that the House suspend the rules relating to the resolution (H. Res. 459) expressing the sense of

the House of Representatives that Newdow v. U.S. Congress

was erroneously decided, and for other purposes.

Attest:

Clerk.
# Publicatieblad C 152/9 ju

| | ISSN 1725-2474 |
| --- | --- |
| Publicatieblad
  van de Europese Unie | C 152 |
| | |
| Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal | Mededelingen en bekendmakingen | 47e jaargang9 juni 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2474

Publicatieblad

van de Europese Unie

C 152

Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal

Mededelingen en bekendmakingen

47e jaargang9 juni 2004

---

| Nummer | Inhoud | Bladzijde |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Mededelingen |
| | Commissie |
| 2004/C 152/1 | Wisselkoersen van de euro | 1 |

Nummer

Inhoud

Bladzijde

I   Mededelingen

Commissie

2004/C 152/1

Wisselkoersen van de euro

1

| NL | |
| --- | --- |

NL

---

I Mededelingen

Commissie

| 9.6.2004 | NL | Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie | C 152/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2004

NL

Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie

C 152/1

---

Wisselkoersen van de euro (1)

8 juni 2004

(2004/C 152/01)

1 euro=

| | Munteenheid | Koers |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US-dollar | 1,2294 |
| JPY | Japanse yen | 135,08 |
| DKK | Deense kroon | 7,4349 |
| GBP | Pond sterling | 0,66840 |
| SEK | Zweedse kroon | 9,1040 |
| CHF | Zwitserse frank | 1,5229 |
| ISK | IJslandse kroon | 87,36 |
| NOK | Noorse kroon | 8,1885 |
| BGN | Bulgaarse lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cypriotische pond | 0,58300 |
| CZK | Tsjechische koruna | 31,243 |
| EEK | Estlandse kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hongaarse forint | 251,15 |
| LTL | Litouwse litas | 3,4527 |
| LVL | Letlandse lat | 0,6623 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4263 |
| PLN | Poolse zloty | 4,5957 |
| ROL | Roemeense leu | 40 758 |
| SIT | Sloveense tolar | 239,1500 |
| SKK | Slovaakse koruna | 39,870 |
| TRL | Turkse lira | 1 811 841 |
| AUD | Australische dollar | 1,7507 |
| CAD | Canadese dollar | 1,6520 |
| HKD | Hongkongse dollar | 9,5838 |
| NZD | Nieuw-Zeelandse dollar | 1,9568 |
| SGD | Singaporese dollar | 2,0990 |
| KRW | Zuid-Koreaanse won | 1 423,46 |
| ZAR | Zuid-Afrikaanse rand | 8,0262 |

Munteenheid

Koers

USD

US-dollar

1,2294

JPY

Japanse yen

135,08

DKK

Deense kroon

7,4349

GBP

Pond sterling

0,66840

SEK

Zweedse kroon

9,1040

CHF

Zwitserse frank

1,5229

ISK

IJslandse kroon

87,36

NOK

Noorse kroon

8,1885

BGN

Bulgaarse lev

1,9558

CYP

Cypriotische pond

0,58300

CZK

Tsjechische koruna

31,243

EEK

Estlandse kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hongaarse forint

251,15

LTL

Litouwse litas

3,4527

LVL

Letlandse lat

0,6623

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4263

PLN

Poolse zloty

4,5957

ROL

Roemeense leu

40 758

SIT

Sloveense tolar

239,1500

SKK

Slovaakse koruna

39,870

TRL

Turkse lira

1 811 841

AUD

Australische dollar

1,7507

CAD

Canadese dollar

1,6520

HKD

Hongkongse dollar

9,5838

NZD

Nieuw-Zeelandse dollar

1,9568

SGD

Singaporese dollar

2,0990

KRW

Zuid-Koreaanse won

1 423,46

ZAR

Zuid-Afrikaanse rand

8,0262

---

(1)

Bron: door de Europese Centrale Bank gepubliceerde referentiekoers.

---
Nov. 28: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL in Syria and Iraq
 By U.S. Central Command News Release
  November 28, 2014 Release # 20141119
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **Tampa, Fla. -** U.S. military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria Nov. 26-28 using bomber and remotely-piloted aircraft to conduct two airstrikes. Separately, U.S. and partner nation military forces conducted thirteen airstrikes in Iraq Nov. 26-28 using fighter, attack, and remotely-piloted aircraft against ISIL terrorists. In Syria, an airstrike near Kobani struck an ISIL fighting position and an ISIL staging area. Near Aleppo, an airstrike struck a tactical ISIL unit. In Iraq, five airstrikes near Kirkuk destroyed five ISIL bunkers, four ISIL vehicles, a bulldozer and an ISIL fighting position and also struck a large ISIL unit and four tactical ISIL units. Near Mosul, two airstrikes destroyed five ISIL vehicles and a heavy weapon, and also struck two ISIL units. Near Ramadi, an airstrike struck a tactical ISIL unit. Near Ar Rutbah, an airstrike destroyed seven ISIL vehicles. Near Fallujah, an airstrike struck a tactical ISIL unit. Near Al Qaim, two airstrikes destroyed a fighting position and an armored vehicle. An airstrike in Bayji struck an ISIL tactical unit, an ISIL vehicle and an ISIL occupied building. All aircraft returned to base safely. Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the terrorist group ISIL and the threat they pose to Iraq, the region and the wider international community. The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group's ability to project power and conduct operations. Coalition nations conducting airstrikes in Iraq include the U.S., Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Coalition Nations conducting airstrikes in Syria include the U.S., Bahrain, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.
1210-AB32-2-1291.html[7/24/2015 10:27:42 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvv-5joe

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1786

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Donna Hilmers

General Comment

Keep the government out of MY RETIREMENT funds.

STOP all the regulations.
H. Res. 4

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 3, 2001.

Resolved, That the Clerk be instructed to inform the

President of the United States that the House of Representatives has elected J. Dennis Hastert, a Representative from

the State of Illinois, Speaker; and Jeffrey J. Trandahl, a citizen of the State of South Dakota, Clerk of the House of

Representatives of the One Hundred Seventh Congress.

Attest:

Clerk.
----

ORDER OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE

(Fourth Chamber)

of 29 April 2004

in Case C-202/03 (reference by the Tribunale Amministrativo per la Lombardia, Sezione Staccato di Brescia, for a preliminary ruling): DAC SpA v Azienda Ospedaliera ‘Spedali Civili’ di Brescia (1)

(Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Directive 89/665/EEC - Review procedures in the sphere of public procurement - Interim relief ante causam)

(2004/C 118/56)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-202/03 – reference to the Court of Justice pursuant to Article 234 EC by the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia, Sezione Staccata di Brescia (Regional Administrative Court for Lombardy, Brescia Division) (Italy) for a preliminary ruling in the case pending before that court between DAC SpA and Azienda Ospedaliera ‘Spedali Civili’ di Brescia, third party Pellegrini SpA, on the interpretation of Articles 1(3) and 2(1) of Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts (OJ 1989 L 395, p. 33), as amended by Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts (OJ 1992 L 209, p. 1) – the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of J.N. Cunha Rodrigues (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet and K. Lenaerts, Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General, R. Grass, Registrar, has made an order on 29 April 2004 the operative part of which is as follows:

On a proper construction of Article 2(1) of Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts, as amended by Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts, the Member States are required to confer on their review bodies the power to adopt, irrespective of whether or not an action going to the substance of the case has already been brought, all interim measures, including measures to suspend the procedure for the award of the public procurement contract at issue.

----

(1)  OJ C 171 of 19 July 2003.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1995
<CASH>                                          26,650
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,423
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,490
<INVENTORY>                                     31,236
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,911
<PP&E>                                          53,435
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,720
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 136,491
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,919
<BONDS>                                         29,849
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,864
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,658
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   136,491
<SALES>                                        191,378
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               191,378
<CGS>                                          119,299
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  119,299
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                50,335
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,253
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,607
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,490
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,117
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    397
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,720
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.59
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 493 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 493

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 664) to amend title II of 
   the Social Security Act to provide that the reductions in Social 
    Security benefits which are required in the case of spouses and 
 surviving spouses who are also receiving certain Government pensions 
shall be equal to the amount by which the total amount of the combined 
 monthly benefit (before reduction) and monthly pension exceeds $1,200.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 18, 2002

Mr. Jefferson submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 664) to amend title II of 
   the Social Security Act to provide that the reductions in Social 
    Security benefits which are required in the case of spouses and 
 surviving spouses who are also receiving certain Government pensions 
shall be equal to the amount by which the total amount of the combined 
 monthly benefit (before reduction) and monthly pension exceeds $1,200.

    Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this resolution the 
House shall without intervention of any point of order consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 664) to amend title II of the Social Security Act 
to provide that the reductions in Social Security benefits which are 
required in the case of spouses and surviving spouses who are also 
receiving certain Government pensions shall be equal to the amount by 
which the total amount of the combined monthly benefit (before 
reduction) and monthly pension exceeds $1,200. The first reading of the 
bill shall be dispensed with. After general debate, which shall be 
confined to the bill and shall not exceed 2 hours, to be equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on Ways and Means, the bill shall be considered for 
amendment under the five-minute rule. No amendment shall be in order 
except an amendment by and if offered by Mr. Jefferson of Louisiana, or 
his designee, and shall be debatable for not to exceed one hour, 
equally divided and controlled by the proponent and a Member opposed 
thereto. Such amendment shall not be subject to an amendment and shall 
not be subject to a division of the question in the House or in the 
Committee of the Whole. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill 
for amendment, the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the 
House with such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments 
thereto to final passage without intervening motion, except one motion 
to recommit with or without instructions.
                                 <all>
```