alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CENTCOM Commander Visits Israeli Defense Leaders

/ Published April 28, 2023

April 28, 2023

Release Number 20230428-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla.**– From April 27 to 28, Gen. Michael “Erik” Kurilla, commander of U.S. Central Command, visited Israel to meet with Defense Minister Yoav Gallant and leadership from the Israel Defense Forces.

During the visit, Kurilla, IDF Chief of the General Staff Lieutenant General Herzi Halevi, and senior IDF officers, observed maritime operations with Flotilla 13, Israel’s Navy commando unit. Kurilla and Halevi also discussed ongoing security operations, land and maritime border security operations, planned joint training events, and opportunities to significantly increase collaboration and interoperability of U.S. and Israeli military forces.

In a private meeting, Gallant and Kurilla spoke of opportunities to strengthen relations between CENTCOM and the IDF to address threats to the region.

“As with every visit with the IDF, I was thoroughly impressed with the capability and warfighting readiness I saw here,” said Kurilla. “The elite Israeli troops I saw today are representative of the discipline and high-level skill I’ve observed across the IDF.

“Our strategic partnerships within the region – to include our longstanding, unbreakable bond with the Israel Defense Forces – are critical to security and stability. All these trips to the region inform my understanding of the threats and challenges faced by each country and the capabilities available. This visit reinforced the importance of this relationship and the many opportunities ahead of us for the Middle East.”

-30-
§ 821.50 Petition for rehearing, reargument, reconsideration or modification of an order of the Board. ( a ) *General.* Any party to a proceeding may petition the Board for rehearing, reargument, reconsideration or modification of a Board order on appeal from a law judge's initial decision or order. An initial decision or appealable order of a law judge that has become final because no timely appeal was taken therefrom may not be the subject of a petition under this section.
( b ) *Timing and service.* The petition must be filed with the Board, and simultaneously served on the other parties, within 30 days after the date of service of the Board's order on appeal from the law judge's initial decision or order.
( c ) *Content.* The petition shall state briefly and specifically the matters of record alleged to have been erroneously decided, and the ground or grounds relied upon. If the petition is based, in whole or in part, upon new matter, it shall set forth such new matter and shall contain affidavits of prospective witnesses, authenticated documents, or both, or an explanation of why such substantiation is unavailable, and shall explain why such new matter could not have been discovered in the exercise of due diligence prior to the date on which the evidentiary record closed. To the extent the petition is not based upon new matter, the Board will not consider arguments that could have been made in the appeal or reply briefs received prior to the Board's decision.
( d ) *Repetitious petitions.* Repetitious petitions will not be entertained by the Board, and will be summarily dismissed.
( e ) *Reply to petition.* Any other party to the proceeding may file a reply to the petition within 15 days after the date on which the petition was served on that party. A copy of such reply shall simultaneously be served on the petitioner and any other parties to the proceeding.
( f ) *Stay of effective date of Board's order.* The filing of a petition under this section shall operate to stay the effective date of the Board's order, unless the Board directs otherwise.
[68 FR 22625, Apr. 29, 2003, as amended at 77 FR 63252, Oct. 16, 2012]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KEVIN J. LISLE,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

HOWARD SKOLNICK; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 12-15141

D.C. No. 3:11-cv-00338-ECRVPC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Edward C. Reed, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 12, 2013**

Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Nevada state prisoner Kevin J. Lisle appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing his action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans

with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

FILED

MAR 21 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
review de novo a district court’s dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 

§ 1915(e)(2). Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000); Barren v.

Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order). We affirm in part,

reverse in part, and remand.

The district court properly dismissed Lisle’s claim that prison officials

violated the ADA by refusing to allow him to use a leg brace because Lisle failed

to allege facts sufficient to show that prison officials discriminated against him

“solely by reason of disability.” Lee v. City of Los Angeles, 250 F.3d 668, 691 (9th

Cir. 2001) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); see also Simmons v.

Navajo County, Ariz., 609 F.3d 1011, 1022 (9th Cir. 2010) (“The ADA prohibits

discrimination because of disability, not inadequate treatment for disability.”).

However, the district court erroneously dismissed Lisle’s deliberate

indifference claim because the allegations in the amended complaint liberally

construed were “sufficient to meet the low threshold for proceeding past the

screening stage.” Wilhelm v. Rotman, 680 F.3d 1113, 1123 (9th Cir. 2012); see

Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1057 (9th Cir. 2004) (deliberate indifference

standard).

2 12-15141
Accordingly, we reverse in part, and remand with instructions for the district

court to order service of the amended complaint by the United States Marshal.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

3 12-15141
#### § 800.39 Additional rulemaking proceedings.

The NTSB may initiate any further rulemaking proceedings it finds necessary or desirable. For example, interested persons may be invited to make oral arguments, to participate in conferences between the Board or a representative of the Board and interested persons at which minutes of the conference are kept, to appear at informal hearings presided over by officials designated by the Board, at which a transcript or minutes are kept, or participate in any other proceeding to assure informed administrative action and to protect the public interest.
From: Vladimir Golod [mailto:vgolod@tampabay.rr.com] 

Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2015 3:22 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

It's probably unconstitutional for our Government to tell "the people" how they can or cannot 

manage their own money.

Nobody will benefit from this. I think this proposed regulation is on a verge of stupidity.

Vlad

vgolod@tampabay.rr.com
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 346

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding prenatal

care for women and children.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 8, 2002

Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN (for herself, Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia, Ms. HART,

Mrs. MYRICK, and Mrs. NORTHUP) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives

regarding prenatal care for women and children.

Whereas unborn children benefit from quality prenatal health

care;

Whereas the levels of infant mortality, premature delivery,

and low birthweight are exceedingly high in the United

States as compared with other developed countries;

Whereas low birthweight and premature delivery are causally

associated with developmental disabilities among children;

Whereas proper prenatal care can prevent avoidable birth defects;
2

•HRES 346 IH

Whereas new medical advances, together with early diagnosis,

can treat children with a wide range of disorders including spina bifida, HIV/AIDS, fetal distress, and anemia;

Whereas fetal surgery is now able to correct many life-threatening congenital disorders;

Whereas pregnant women benefit from quality health care,

including physician care, hospital care, and prescription

medications;

Whereas prenatal care can prevent medical and surgical complications that a mother may encounter during pregnancy

and birth;

Whereas prenatal care can identify and treat a mother’s preexisting medical conditions which may be impacted by

pregnancy;

Whereas an estimated 10,900,000 women of childbearing age

(18–44) do not have health insurance;

Whereas the State Children’s Health Insurance Program

(SCHIP), created under title XXI of the Social Security

Act, expands health coverage to uninsured children whose

families earn too much for medicaid but too little to afford private coverage; and

Whereas on January 31, 2002, the Secretary of Health and

Human Services, Tommy Thompson, proposed a regulation to allow States to include coverage for children from

conception to age 19, which would allow low-income pregnant mothers to receive prenatal and delivery care: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) commends Secretary of Health and Human

3 Services, Tommy Thompson, for moving to imme-
3

•HRES 346 IH

1 diately make SCHIP resources available to States to

2 care for unborn children and pregnant mothers; and

3 (2) commends Secretary Thompson for recog4 nizing pregnant mothers and unborn children as de5 serving of concern about their health and well-being.

Æ
# U.S. Naval Forces Rescue Mariners from Stranded Ship in Gulf of Aden

/ Published June 18, 2021

GULF OF ADEN – A U.S. Naval ship assigned to U.S. 5th Fleet provided emergency assistance to a motor vessel in distress in the international waters of the Gulf of Aden, June 16.

The Military Sealift Command fleet replenishment oiler USNS Patuxent (T-AO 201) identified a vessel flying the international distress flag and proceeded toward them to render assistance.

The small vessel reported that it had been drifting for 12 days and was taking on water.

Patuxent safely recovered the four crew members and provided them with food, water and a medical screening. 

The U.S. 5th Fleet regularly works with coalition forces, regional partners and the shipping industry to maintain the regional awareness necessary to facilitate aid like this to mariners in distress.

“This is the second time in under two weeks the Patuxent crew has answered the call to assist fellow mariners in distress,” said Navy Capt. Michael O’Driscoll, commander of Task Force (TF) 53. “I am extremely proud of them and I think this perfectly highlights the value of sustained maritime presence alongside our regional and coalition partners.”

The 1974 International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) outlines the obligation of all mariners to provide assistance to those in distress at sea.

The U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations encompasses about 2.5 million square miles of water area and includes the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, Red Sea and parts of the Indian Ocean. The expanse is comprised of 20 countries and includes three critical choke points at the Strait of Hormuz, the Suez Canal and the Strait of Bab al Mandeb at the southern tip of Yemen.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 165 (Monday, August 28, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 58578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18484]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas and Oil Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP23-975-000.
    Applicants: Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Fuel Retention Rates--Winter 
2023 to be effective 10/1/2023.
    Filed Date: 8/22/23.
    Accession Number: 20230822-5066.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/5/23.

    Any person desiring to intervene, to protest, or to answer a 
complaint in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with 
Rules 211, 214, or 206 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211, 
385.214, or 385.206) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the 
specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is 
necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    For other information, call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, 
call (202) 502-8659. The Commission's Office of Public Participation 
(OPP) supports meaningful public engagement and participation in 
Commission proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including 
landowners, environmental justice communities, Tribal members and 
others, access publicly available information and navigate Commission 
processes. For public inquiries and assistance with making filings such 
as interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is 
encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9fd0cfcfdff9faedfcb1f8f0e9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="28677878684e4d5a4b064f475e">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: August 22, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-18484 Filed 8-25-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 585.112 Purpose.

The purpose of these reporting requirements is to assist the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in determining whether a manufacturer has complied with Standard No. 216a (49 CFR 571.216a).
Aug. 29. 2011 3:15PM
BILL POSEY

16mm DistRter, FLonioa

conmrree:

FINANCIAL SERVICES.
SUBCOMMITTEES:
CAPrTAL MaRKere:

Congress of the Unityd States

No. 0281 P. 2

wow posey.house.gov

WASHINGTON OFFICE:
192 CANNON House OFFice BuNLOING
Wasuineton, DC 20815.

(202) 226-9671
Fase: (202) 226-2518

House of Representatives
Washington, BC 20515 Somer ares

2726 JUDGE FRAN JAMIESON WAY, BLOG. C
Metaounne, FL 32940

Agua 29,2011 eae ae

Domesnic ano
INTERNATIONAL Monitany Poucy

MEMBER OF
HOUSE AEROSPACE CAUCUS

REPUBLICAN STUDY COMMITTEE,

Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis
U.S, Department of Labor

~ 200 Constitution Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20210

Dear Secretary Solis,

In October 2010, the Department of Labor proposed an expanded definition of a “fiduciary” under the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the Internal Revenue Code. This new definition
includes anyone who receives compensation as a result of providing individualized investment advice to
employee benefit plans, plan participants or Individual Retirement Arrangement (IRA) owners.

Under the curreiit regulations, which have been in place since 1975, persons giving investment advice to
an employee benefit plan who have no discretionary control over such plan become subject to the ERISA
fiduciary standard only if they satisfy each element of a five-part test. The proposed definition reverses
this policy by presuming that any person who provides investment information to a plan, Baiticipanis or
IRA owners is a fiduciary unless an exception applies.

The proposed regulation raises a number of concems. It applies the ERISA fiduciary standard to advice
given to IRA owners, yet IRAs are not governed by ERISA. The proposal excludes investment sellers
from fiduciary status if the recipient of the advice knows that the advisor has an “adverse” interest, but the
exemption is vague and therefore unreliable. Furthermore, while a “seller's exception” may exclude
many commission-based advisors from the proposed regulation, serious questions remain as to how broad
or workable this exception may be.

Fiduciary standards protect consumers and hold financial advisors accountable for their actions, but they -
must be applied consistently between regulatory agencies to be effective. The proposed regulation is
inconsistent with Securities and Exchange Commission regulations governing fiduciaries, and will result
in fewer choices and increased costs for investors.

Given these concerns, I ask that the Department withdraw the proposed regulation or, at the very least,
take no further action until the Securities and Exchange Commission has completed new regulations that
would apply to all persons licensed to sell securities or provide investment advice, as authorized by the
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act.

Thank you for your consideration with regard to this matter. . Ls r

au

Q3AIg9

Member of Congress

BU

PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
EXHIBIT 11.2 - COMPUTATION OF PRO FORMA PER SHARE EARNINGS
                      Advanced Communication Systems, Inc.
                      (in thousands, except per share data)

                                              Three Months       Six Months
                                                 Ended             Ended
                                             March 31, 1997    March 31, 1997
 Basic:                                      --------------    --------------
   Basic average shares outstanding.........      3,767             3,767
         

   Stock issued to satisfy S corporation 
   distribution in excess of preceding 
   twelve months earnings based on the 
   initial public offering price per share..        479               479
                                             --------------    --------------

   Total basic average shares outstanding...      4,246             4,246
                                             ==============    ==============

   Pro forma net income.....................       $446              $774
                                             ==============    ==============

   Pro forma net income per share - basic...      $0.11             $0.18
                                             ==============    ==============

Diluted:
   Total basic average shares outstanding...      4,246             4,246
   Plus dilutive stock options..............        100               100
                                             --------------    --------------
   Total diluted average shares.............      4,346             4,346
                                             ==============    ==============
                    
   Net income per share - diluted...........      $0.10             $0.18
                                             ==============    ==============
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1995
<CASH>                                         842,953
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,375,492
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 23,466,727
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,085,925
<PP&E>                                      35,152,977
<DEPRECIATION>                              21,730,893
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              46,881,051
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,634,171
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          728,689
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,805,150
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                46,881,051
<SALES>                                    140,725,065
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           140,725,065
<CGS>                                      123,910,694
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              137,835,478
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,704
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,783,198
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 79,685
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             79,685
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (420,444)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (340,759)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# CENTCOM Commander Engages With Regional Partners

/ Published Nov. 10, 2022

Nov. 10, 2022

Release Number 20221110-02

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla.****–**From Col. Joe Buccino, CENTCOM Spokesman:

“Over the past week, Gen. Michael “Erik” Kurilla, commander of U.S. Central Command, held meaningful discussions with leaders from all partnered militaries in the Middle East. These discussions included one-on-one dialogues with the Chiefs of Defense from the following nations: Bahrain, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Qatar, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Yemen.

“The leaders discussed matters of mutual importance to our regional partners and focused on their enduring communal commitment to the security of the Middle East.”

-30-