alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 4.10


                                                               December 22, 2005

AlbaHealth, LLC                                   Encompass Group, L.L.C.
201 St. Germain Avenue S.W.                       615 Macon Street
Valdese, North Carolina 28690                     McDonough, Georgia 30253
Attention: Dan Mesika                             Attention: David A. Huelsbeck
Facsimile: (828) 879-6595                         Facsimile: (770) 957-6728

General Electric Capital Corporation
401 Merritt Seven
Norwalk, CT 06851-1177
Attention: Peter DiBiasi, Account Manager
Facsimile: (203) 229-1955

Dear Sirs:

     Reference is made to that certain Put Option Agreement, dated as of
September 6, 2002, by and among AlbaHealth, LLC, Alba-Waldensian, Inc.,
Encompass Group, L.L.C. and General Capital Corporation, as amended by Amendment
No. 1 to the Put Option Agreement, dated December 13, 2004 (the "Put Option
Agreement"). Terms capitalized but not defined herein shall have the meanings
assigned to such terms in the Option Agreement.

     Tefron USA, Inc. (f/k/a Alba-Waldensian, Inc.) hereby exercises its right
to sell all of its Common Units to the Company in exchange for the Put
Consideration in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Put
Option Agreement.

                                         TEFRON USA, INC.


                                         By: /s/ Yos Shiran  /s/ Asaf Alperovitz
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Name: Yosef Shiran, Asaf Alperovitz
                                         Title:   CEO               CFO

cc: Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A              Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP
    3000 Dain Rauscher Plaza               1055 Washington Boulevard
    60 South Sixth Street                  Stamford, Connecticut  06901
    Minneapolis, Minnesota  55402          Attention:  Mario Ippolito, Esq.
    Attention: Timothy M. Barnett, Esq.    Facsimile: (203) 359-3031
    Facsimile: (612) 347-0600

    General Electric Capital Corporation   Dewey Ballantine LLP
    201 High Ridge Road                    1301 Avenue of the Americas
    Stamford, Connecticut  06927-5100      New York, NY  10019
    Attention: Corporate - Counsel         Morton A. Pierce, Esq.
    Commercial Finance                     Facsimile:  (212) 259-6333
    Facsimile: (203) 316-7889
Exhibit 23

[Letterhead of Deloitte & Touche LLP]

 Deloitte &
 Touche LLP
____________                      _________________________________________
                                  Suite 900        Telephone (313) 396-3000
                                  600 Renaissance Center
                                  Detroit, Michigan  48243-1704


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 
33-64179 and 33-55787 of Chrysler Financial Corporation (a subsidiary of 
Chrysler Corporation) on Form S-3 of our report dated January 18, 1996 
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Chrysler Financial 
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1995.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


January 18, 1996


_______________
Deloitte Touche
Tohmatsu
International  
_______________
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Computer Horizons Corp. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31,2005 (the “Annual Report”), I, Dennis J. Conroy, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, hereby certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:

1.     the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78mor 78o(d)); and

2.     the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Date:   March 16, 2006 | /s/ DENNIS  J. CONROY |
|---------------------------------------|----------------------------|
|                                  | DENNIS J. CONROY           |
|                                  | *Chief Executive Officer*  |

 

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Kpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended(the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporatedby reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, orthe Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specificallyincorporates it by reference.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                          27,630
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   84,342
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,456
<INVENTORY>                                     60,944
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               189,996
<PP&E>                                         216,030
<DEPRECIATION>                                 112,604
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 384,798
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          127,345
<BONDS>                                        111,342
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     21,914
<COMMON>                                        14,125
<OTHER-SE>                                      66,791
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   384,798
<SALES>                                        526,624
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               526,624
<CGS>                                          387,340
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  387,340
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,607
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,493
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 40,318
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,527
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,791
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,791
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.51
        

</TABLE>
§ 6.9 Standards for awards. ( a ) An eligible applicant may receive an award for fees and expenses incurred by that party in connection with a decision in favor of the applicant in a proceeding covered by this Part, unless the position of the Department over which the applicant has prevailed was substantially justified or special circumstances make the award sought unjust. The burden of proof that an award should not be made to an eligible applicant is on the Department where it has initiated the proceeding. No presumption arises that the Department's position was not substantially justified simply because the Department did not prevail. Whether or not the position of the Department was substantially justified shall be determined on the basis of the administrative record, as a whole, in the adversary adjudication for which fees and other expenses are sought. The “position of the Department” means, in addition to the position taken by the agency in the adversary adjudication, the action or failure to act by the Department upon which the adversary adjudication may be based.
( b ) In the context of a Departmental proceeding to enforce a party's compliance with a statutory or regulatory requirement, if the demand by the Department is substantially in excess of the amount awarded to the government pursuant to the decision of the adjudicative officer and is unreasonable when compared with such decision, under the facts and circumstances of the case, the adjudicative officer shall award to an eligible applicant party the fees and expenses related to defending against the excessive demand, unless the applicant party has committed a willful violation of law or otherwise acted in bad faith, or special circumstances make an award unjust. Fees and expenses awarded under this paragraph shall be paid only as a consequence of appropriations provided in advance. As used in this section, “demand” means the express demand of the Department which led to the adversary adjudication, but does not include a recitation by the Department of the maximum statutory penalty ( i ) In the administrative complaint, or
( ii ) Elsewhere when accompanied by an express demand for a lesser amount.
( c ) The decision of the Department on the application for fees and other expenses shall be the final administrative decision under this section.
( d ) An award will be reduced or denied if the applicant has unduly or unreasonably protracted the proceeding.
[62 FR 19234, Apr. 21, 1997]
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 47 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 47

  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a postage 
          stamp should be issued honoring American farm women.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2001

 Mr. Green of Wisconsin (for himself, Ms. Hooley of Oregon, Mr. Buyer, 
 Mr. Barrett, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Kleczka, Mr. Nethercutt, Mr. Petri, and 
 Mr. Rangel) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a postage 
          stamp should be issued honoring American farm women.

Whereas American farm women have for centuries been critical to the survival of 
        the family farm;
Whereas in 1862 the newly formed Department of Agriculture released a study 
        showing that on 3 out of 4 farms the wife ``works harder'' and ``endures 
        more, than any other on the place'';
Whereas American farm women played an important role in the United States 
        victories in the World Wars, when they and their families took on even 
        greater responsibilities on the farms, maintaining the food and fiber 
        needs of our country as millions of men left the farms to fight in the 
        wars;
Whereas women have been actively involved in critical farm decisions, such as 
        the buying and selling of land and farm equipment, estate planning, and 
        developing new production practices; and
Whereas American farm women play an integral role in farm tasks, such as tending 
        to animals, field work, bookkeeping, and raising children: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) the United States Postal Service should issue a postage 
        stamp honoring American farm women; and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend 
        to the Postmaster General that such a stamp be issued.
                                 <all>
```
| Amtsblattder Europäischen Union | ISSN 1725-2407C 140A**47. Jahrgang****20. Mai 2004** |
| --- | --- |

Amtsblattder Europäischen Union

ISSN 1725-2407C 140A**47. Jahrgang****20. Mai 2004**

| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| |
| Informationsnummer | Inhalt | Seite | |
| | | I *Mitteilungen*. . . . . .II *Vorbereitende Rechtsakte*. . . . . .III *Bekanntmachungen* | |
| | | **Europäisches Parlament** |
| | Hinweis für die Leser | 1 |
| 2004/C 140 A/01 | Leitfaden für Bewerber der vom Europäischen Parlament durchgeführten Stellenaussschreibungen | 3 |
| 2004/C 140 A/02 | Mitteilung an die Bewerberinnen und Bewerber, die auf elektronischem Weg Zugang zu diesem Text haben | 13 |
| 2004/C 140 A/03 | Stellenausschreibung PE/89/S für Hochschulabsolventinnen/Hochschulabsolventen | 14 |

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

---

Informationsnummer

Inhalt

Seite

I *Mitteilungen*

. . . . . .

---

II *Vorbereitende Rechtsakte*

. . . . . .

---

III *Bekanntmachungen*

**Europäisches Parlament**

Hinweis für die Leser

1

2004/C 140 A/01

Leitfaden für Bewerber der vom Europäischen Parlament durchgeführten Stellenaussschreibungen

3

2004/C 140 A/02

Mitteilung an die Bewerberinnen und Bewerber, die auf elektronischem Weg Zugang zu diesem Text haben

13

2004/C 140 A/03

Stellenausschreibung PE/89/S für Hochschulabsolventinnen/Hochschulabsolventen

14

**DE**
#### § 605.32 Accumulation of evidentiary material.

The Administrator will allow the respondent not more than 30 days to show cause, by submission of evidence, why no violation should be deemed to have occurred. A like period shall be allowed to the complainant, if any, during which he may submit evidence to rebut the evidence offered by the respondent. The Administrator may undertake such further investigation, as he may deem necessary, including, in his discretion, the holding of an evidentiary hearing or hearings.
...... ~- ---··· .... --···-··. ·-·- ·-------- -·· .. ·--··-- .. ·-----· ·-----~----- ·--·-·----------· -·-·-· -----~~~---- ---··-- -------·--·----------

____ ;I~ Wf';+-;nj ..i!"- \-e_sq_('d s o Y\ 

h o _Y..> __ ±9 5o . ec0Dt..:~:- -8~~ n3 Ci. <-c p y o-f 

-1::~~ .S~~~~·~ .. v·ii-'</ <(__i-Q..('k_s {'-ecotd ~f\ 

t:~ __ :fc_llo~.u;.,j: ·rr_._?-::+-. No c._ A. J3,J.<J>7-b 

--~r- ... ~+. No c~ ~3/;L<r><o-£3, 

T r ~--~ +. ~ o cA.. ~ 3., 2 ~ r - (!;, 

I r-. c+-, No cR :) :, :J fo-b . . ----- . - ·I -

H -~.Jf_~ Qy".e_ '-\ h..c.. \.0 ('~+ N~ h.v s ... w ~ -? 9, :1. -~ l - 0 g 

__ _ _ _ w~~_)<?,?-3/-67 

.wR- 7~ J-.3/-65 ---------- ---- --- ......... - --1 

WR_~_ 7'6

1

?..31-olo 

L CVo_JJ. /; /A.C?_ i-o K.vto 10 +~J __ ;~ _~c) hvLU 

Y'Y\v~....c_~ i + Wo ..,.__/ J ~' ~ pu..rc~QS.,.L: Cop!~ S :f2f'c>,. 

T~ Lo lvf"+. fh~ K.s +or- yo'-"-r 'f-,· ,'JnJ2.... , .PhQ>Q._ 

Rg$poY1 c,)J yoc..z.r e czr- I: a.~-+- Cc>,~ v ~~/) C.--'L_~ 

- RECEIVED IN - - · -~ e.spe <=-r-PuJt '! 

COUR~ ~-Fo ~RI~INAL APP;A~_§__ _ J<~ 1\ ~+h 7) o~ vt so VI 

___ MAR 18 2015 ~ob~sc''"~ ~;+- ·rbc /f[?9'1'l 

Abel Acosta, Clerk 

l 'J.C)_! r Ftlfl't ~s 2 ~ 

A-6~ ~~ (~. '7?6{)1 . . '- ( ..
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,628,552
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               41,838,254
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,208,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            41,006,666
<PP&E>                                       9,268,008
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,601,226
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              75,856,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       36,515,591
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,845,857
<COMMON>                                     1,793,995
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,571,938
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                75,856,300
<SALES>                                     54,546,949
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            54,546,949
<CGS>                                       49,853,835
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               56,831,140
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,956,403
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             425,627
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,709,818)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (799,630)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,600,306)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,777,306)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.54)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.54)
<FN>
<F1>Earnings per share have been restated to comply with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 128. The quarters ending September 30
and June 30, 1997 and fiscal years 1997 and 1996 have been restated for the
effects of SFAS No. 128. EPS-PRIMARY reflects EPS-BASIC for all periods
presented.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# Combined Maritime Forces Hosts 2024 Maritime Security Conference

/ Published April 19, 2024
MANAMA, Bahrain , 
Combined Maritime Forces (CMF) hosted senior military leaders during a two-day maritime security conference held onboard Naval Support Activity Bahrain, April 16-17.

CMF member and partner nation delegates and naval leaders were among the guests attending the annual maritime security conference, hosted by the world’s largest naval partnership.

Calling CMF a “tremendously rewarding and diverse coalition,” Vice Adm. George Wikoff, CMF commander, told participants during his opening remarks their combined strengths should be channeled with purpose.

“We can all agree on the importance of maritime security throughout this region,” he said. “As Commander of the CMF, I see myself as the CEO and you are the board of directors. And as that board of directors, you tell me what we want to achieve, and it is up to me and the CMF organization to deliver.”

To that end, the conference attendees reviewed initiatives and accomplishments over the last 12 months, looked at the year ahead, and coordinated plans for enhancing regional maritime security and partnerships in the future.

Additionally, representatives from European Union Naval Forces provided updates on operations ATALANTA and ASPIDES. ATALANTA is an ongoing counter-piracy military operation off the Horn of Africa and in the Western Indian Ocean, established in December 2008. ASPIDES is a European Union defensive maritime security operation established in February 2024 in response to Houthi action in the Southern Red Sea.

“It’s fantastic to see so many representatives from CMF partners across the world here in Bahrain,” said U.K. Royal Navy Commodore Mark Anderson, CBE, Deputy Commander of

CMF. “The maritime security conference represents the most senior governance level for CMF and is an opportunity for our member and partner nations’ senior officers to witness the work of the teams here, including their own.”

CMF includes five combined task forces that focus on counter-narcotics, counter-smuggling, suppressing piracy, maritime security enhancement training, encouraging regional cooperation and working with other partners to strengthen maritime capabilities.

The multinational partnership is headquartered in Bahrain and consists of 43 member and partner nations whose forces operate in the Red Sea, Gulf of Aden, Northern Arabian Sea, Gulf of Oman, Arabian Gulf and Indian Ocean. CMF’s nations are united in upholding international rules-based order to protect the free flow of commerce, ensure regional maritime security and deter illicit activity by non-state actors.
----

(2004/C 88 E/0382)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-1931/03

by Horst Schnellhardt (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(5 June 2003)

Subject:   Introduction of European food standards legislation in the accession countries

According to press reports, serious problems have emerged with regard to the introduction of European food standards legislation in undertakings in the accession countries.

Can the Commission answer the following:

Answer given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(30 June 2003)

The Commission is closely monitoring the food safety issues in the acceding Member States. By the day of accession, all new Member States will have to apply the high level of European standards, as defined by the ‘acquis communautaire’.

In general terms, important progress has already been achieved in the Candidate Countries with regard to food safety. There is no doubt that the accession to the Union will significantly improve the food safety standards in these countries.

Through regular missions undertaken by the Commission's Food and Veterinary Office, peer reviews and other missions, complemented by various other monitoring tools such as Monitoring Tables and Tables of Correspondance, the Commission follows closely the developments in the acceding Member States. Any problem so far identified was communicated to the respective countries. Should any shortcoming arise in the field of food safety by the day of accession, appropriate measures, which may include safeguard measures, will be taken to protect consumers in the Union.

As regards agro-food establishments in Poland and Hungary, a limited number of transitional periods were granted in the conclusion of the accession negotiations in December 2002. Such transitional periods were granted to 370 meat establishments in Poland (including cold stores and fish processing plants). These represent 13 % of the total number of Polish meat establishments expected at the day of accession. Transitional periods were also granted to 169 Polish milk establishments representing 51 % of the total number of Polish milk establishments expected at accession. These transitional periods are valid for Poland until 31 December 2007. In Hungary, 44 high capacity meat establishments have been granted transitional periods, representing 7 % of the total number of Hungarian meat establishments. These transitional periods for Hungary are valid until 31 December 2006.

During the transitional period, all products from establishments subject to such a transitional measure must be specifically labelled and only marketed locally; consequently releasing into the Internal Market will be prohibited.

Based on the Commission's monitoring, agro-food establishments without a transitional period and not complying with the Union food safety requirements by accession will need to be closed. In the meantime, the Commission provides assistance in the upgrading of agro-food establishments by providing expertise through Technical Assistance Information Exchange Office (TAIEX) and peer reviews, training activities and through the Twinning programme. It furthermore provides significant financial support from PHARE and Sapard.

----