alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.16

                 SCHEDULE OF INDEMNITY AGREEMENTS


               Employee                      Date of Agreement 

          Edward C. Benninger                February 24, 1987
          Ronald K. Calgaard                 February 16, 1996
          Terrence E. Ciliske                July 18, 1996
          Robert G. Dettmer                  October 17, 1991
          A. Ray Dudley                      July 21, 1988
          Ruben M. Escobedo                  October 1, 1994
          Peter A. Fasullo                   July 18, 1996
          Gregory C. King                    January 23, 1997
          James L. Johnson                   April 25, 1991
          Lowell H. Lebermann                February 24, 1987
          E. Baines Manning                  July 16, 1986
          Stan L. McLelland                  February 24, 1987
          Susan Kaufman Purcell              October 1, 1994


    Each of these agreements is in substantially the same form as the
agreement described in Exhibit 10.15 to the Valero Energy Corporation Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1376.html[7/23/2015 6:30:15 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvm-mpz0

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1376

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Leave my 401K alone!
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.243 What is the procedure for an alcohol screening test using an EBT or non-evidential breath ASD? As the BAT or STT, you must take the following steps: ( a ) Select, or allow the employee to select, an individually wrapped or sealed mouthpiece from the testing materials.
( b ) Open the individually wrapped or sealed mouthpiece in view of the employee and insert it into the device in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
( c ) Instruct the employee to blow steadily and forcefully into the mouthpiece for at least six seconds or until the device indicates that an adequate amount of breath has been obtained.
( d ) Show the employee the displayed test result.
( e ) If the device is one that prints the test number, testing device name and serial number, time, and result directly onto the ATF, you must check to ensure that the information has been printed correctly onto the ATF.
( f ) If the device is one that prints the test number, testing device name and serial number, time and result, but on a separate printout rather than directly onto the ATF, you must affix the printout of the information to the designated space on the ATF with tamper-evident tape or use a self-adhesive label that is tamper-evident.
( g ) If the device is one that does not print the test number, testing device name and serial number, time, and result, or it is a device not being used with a printer, you must record this information in Step 3 of the ATF.
Small projects reap large gains in Helmand
 By Cpl. Ned Johnson , ISAF Joint Command
  100629helmand
 KABUL, Afghanistan (June 28, 2010) — Afghans, with ISAF forces support, are planning small projects that will improve the residents’ quality of life in Musa Qal’eh district of Helmand Province. One of these projects to be done is the completion of much-needed repairs to the Yatimchay Road; paved roads will aid in the safer travels of both local residents and ISAF troops. “It will help limit improvised explosive devices,” said Maj. Anthony Aragon, Marines civil affairs team leader. “This road will also allow [residents] to travel to Musa Qal’eh easier so they can sell their goods at the bazaar.” Other projects, called micro-grants, are similar to small-business loans given to Afghans who own a business they would like to expand. “These businessmen are excited to look at a better future,” Aragon said. “We just give them a little money and guidance and their entrepreneurial spirit does the rest.”“We tie everything back to the Afghan government,” he added “We want the people to know that their government and local governor care about them.” Small projects in rural areas of Afghanistan are just as important as the larger projects in major cities. Even though projects are done solely to benefit the Afghans, there are tactical benefits as well. “Once the people realize we are here to help them, they want the projects to continue,” said Cpl. Cameron Brainard, Marines civil affairs team member. “The best way to do that is to keep the Taliban out.” “We are seeing the positive change here,” Aragon said. “They see us as a positive [partner] and take ownership of what they have.” Afghan contractors and workers finished recent projects funded by ISAF ahead of schedule; small and large-scale projects will continue throughout Helmand Province in the future.
For the Docket

Water Quality Standards for the State of Florida’s Lakes and Flowing Waters

Docket ID No. OW-2009-0596

Meeting with Representatives from the Federal Water Quality Coalition (FWQC) and counsel

July 14, 2010

In Attendance:

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency – Ephraim King, OST

 Betsy Behl, OST

American Forest and Paper Association (AF&PA) – Jerry Schwartz

American Petroleum Institute (API) – Roger Claff

Georgia Pacific (GP) – Robert Sackellares

National Association of Clean Water Agencies (NACWA) – Chris Hornback

National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) – Glynn Rountree

Hunton & Williams – Brooks Smith

Barnes & Thornburg – Fred Andes

Hall & Associates – John Hall

Summary:

FWQC requested the meeting to discuss the proposed Water Quality Standards for the State of 

Florida’s Lakes and Flowing Waters rule, published in January 2010. Specifically, FWQC 

provided comments on:

 Timing and the substantial comments EPA received on the proposed rule

 Science Advisory Board review of the Estuaries rule versus the Inland rule

 Reference approach versus stressor-response approach

 EPA’s proposal of Downstream Protection Values (DPVs) and how other states have 

dealt with downstream protection

 The impact of the proposed criteria on existing TMDLs in Florida

 Implementation issues

 Restoration standards

EPA did not provide any information about EPA positions regarding addressing comments 

received or possible final rule requirements.
1210-AB32-2-1631.html[7/26/2015 9:21:32 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jy0-7bb2

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2128

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Jennings Martin

General Comment

People can control their own 401 / IRA/ or what ever retirement plan they have. They do not need Government

 telling them 

How to spend their money , what to by or what to eat . I retired at age 55 and am doing gust fine living off my

 retirement account .

Thank You.

.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0922.html[7/21/2015 6:12:09 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-aul7

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0922

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

The government should mind its own business. Besides, I am sure that the politicians in charge would exempt

 themselves

from any rules and regulations that they think must be forced on everyone else.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 164 (Friday, August 25, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 58288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18281]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Complementary & Integrative Health; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Complementary and 
Integrative Health Special Emphasis Panel; Institutional Research 
Training Grants (IT).
    Date: September 29, 2023.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, 
Democracy II, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Michael Eric Authement, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NCCIH, NIH, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 
20817, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ed80848e858c8881c38c9899858880888399ad838485c38a829b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7d10141e151c1811531c08091518101813093d131415531a120b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, 
Research and Training in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 21, 2023.
Victoria E. Townsend,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-18281 Filed 8-24-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit
      32.1




Certification




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Michael W. Laphen,  Chief Executive
      Officer of Computer Sciences Corporation (the Company), hereby certify
      that:




(1)  The
      Company’s Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
      March 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated
                January 11, 2008
            
            /s/    MICHAEL
                W.
                LAPHENMichael
                W. Laphen
              Chief
                Executive Officer
§ 511.15 Time. ( a ) *Computation.* In computing any period of time prescribed or allowed by the rules in this part, the day of the act, event, or default from which the designated period of time begins to run shall not be included. The last day of the period so computed shall be included, unless it is a Saturday, a Sunday, or a legal holiday, in which event the period runs until the end of the next day which is not a Saturday, a Sunday, or a legal holiday. When the period of time prescribed or allowed is less than 7 days, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays shall be excluded in the computation. As used in this part, “legal holiday” includes New Year's Day, Washington's Birthday, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veteran's Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day, and any other day appointed as a holiday by the President or the Congress of the United States.
( b ) *Additional time after service by mail.* Whenever a party is required or permitted to do an act within a prescribed period after service of a document and the document is served by mail, three (3) days shall be added to the prescribed period.
( c ) *Extensions.* For good cause shown, the Presiding Officer may extend any time limit prescribed or allowed under this part or by order of the Administrator or the Presiding Officer, except those governing the filing of interlocutory appeals and appeals from Initial Decisions and those expressly requiring the Administrator's action. Except as otherwise provided by law, the Administrator, for good cause shown, may extend any time limit prescribed under this part, or by order of the Administrator or the Presiding Officer. A party or participant may petition the Presiding Officer or the Administrator, as appropriate, for an extension under this paragraph. Such a petition shall be filed prior to the occurrence of the time limit which is the subject of the petition.
Year Out of Season # occurrences of

8-hour averages at or above 0.060 ppm Date Daily Maximum 8-hr average Ozone Concentration (ppm) County Site ID before April 0
- -- - after October 0
- -- - before April 1 03/25 0.060 Sumner 201910002 after October 0
- - - - 03/17 0.061 Leavenworth 201030003 03/17 0.063 Linn 201070002 03/21 0.060 Shawnee 201770013 03/22 0.060 Johnson 200910010 03/22 0.062 Linn 201070002 03/22 0.060 Shawnee 201770013 03/29 0.061 Trego 201950001 after October 0
- - - - 03/31 0.060 Johnson 200910010 03/31 0.061 Shawnee 201770013 after October 0
- - - - 7

2 2007

2008

2009

2010 before April

before AprilResponsible Agency Code and Name Land Use Location Monitor Type

- - - -

- - - - (0563) Kansas Department Of Health And Environment RESIDENTIAL RURAL OTHER

- - - - (0563) Kansas Department Of Health And Environment RESIDENTIAL URBAN AND CENTER CITY SLAMS (0563) Kansas Department Of Health And Environment AGRICULTURAL RURAL OTHER (0563) Kansas Department Of Health And Environment RESIDENTIAL URBAN AND CENTER CITY SPECIAL PURPOSE (0563) Kansas Department Of Health And Environment COMMERCIAL SUBURBAN SLAMS (0563) Kansas Department Of Health And Environment AGRICULTURAL RURAL OTHER (0563) Kansas Department Of Health And Environment RESIDENTIAL URBAN AND CENTER CITY SPECIAL PURPOSE (0563) Kansas Department Of Health And Environment AGRICULTURAL RURAL OTHER

- - - - (0563) Kansas Department Of Health And Environment COMMERCIAL SUBURBAN SLAMS (0563) Kansas Department Of Health And Environment RESIDENTIAL URBAN AND CENTER CITY SPECIAL PURPOSE

- - - -Monitoring Objective Elevation (m)

- -

- - REGIONAL TRANSPORT 383

- - POPULATION EXPOSURE 292 REGIONAL TRANSPORT 259 POPULATION EXPOSURE 280 POPULATION EXPOSURE 324.2 REGIONAL TRANSPORT 259 POPULATION EXPOSURE 280 GENERAL/BACKGR OUND 670

- - POPULATION EXPOSURE 324.2 POPULATION EXPOSURE 280

- -
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 991 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 991

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat gold, silver, and 
platinum, in either coin or bar form, in the same manner as stocks and 
 bonds for purposes of the maximum capital gains rate for individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2001

 Mr. Hayworth (for himself, Mr. Paul, Mr. Dreier, Mr. Otter, Mr. Young 
   of Alaska, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Stump, Mr. Gibbons, Mr. Sessions, Mr. 
 Schaffer, Mr. Cannon, and Mr. Largent) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat gold, silver, and 
platinum, in either coin or bar form, in the same manner as stocks and 
 bonds for purposes of the maximum capital gains rate for individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GOLD, SILVER, AND PLATINUM TREATED IN THE SAME MANNER AS 
              STOCKS AND BONDS FOR MAXIMUM CAPITAL GAINS RATE FOR 
              INDIVIDUALS.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (A) of section 1(h)(6) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to definition of collectibles 
gain and loss) is amended by striking ``without regard to paragraph (3) 
thereof'' and inserting ``without regard to so much of paragraph (3) 
thereof as relates to palladium and the bullion requirement for 
physical possession by a trustee''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2000.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 Certification Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, David J. Vajda, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this Annual Report of Columbia Energy Group on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2004;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: March 9, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ David J. VajdaDavid J. VajdaPrincipal Financial Officer
From: Bill Prevost [mailto:billp@quickwaycarriers.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 4:07 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule

Mr. Fred J. Wong

Employee Benefits Security Administration

U.S. Department of Labor

Room N-5655

Washington, D.C.

 

Re; Comments on DOL Proposed Regulation-Definition of the term "Fiduciary"

(FR Vol. 75,Number 204,pages 65263-6578,10/22/2010)

 

Dear Mr. Wong

 

As the President and CEO of Quickway Distribution Services, inc., a 100% Employee Owned 

ESOP. I am writing you to opine on the above proposed rule making. From my perspective, this 

rule creates an oxymoron. The Internal Revenue Service Code(401(a)(28)(C)) mandates THAT 

THE APPRAISER OF A PRIVATE COMPANY ESOP STOCK BE INDEPENDENT. The above 

proposed rule would mandate they BECOME A FIDUCIARY TO THE ESOP. I hope you see the 

obvious contradiction.

 

At a time when there are obvious pressures on everyone in the government, and the President 

has called for a review of all current regulations, I would hate to see this new rule be enacted and 

made a political issue in the House, in addition to creating additional cost burdens on employers 

trying desperately grow jobs. Who does the CEO of an ESOP follow, the IRS or the DOL?

 

I respectfully request that this requirement be removed so that the appraisals and opinions of 

business appraisers remains independent of corporate fiduciary responsibilities.

 

Sincerely,

William P. Prevost
#### Walter Harrison, Respondent, v. The New Foundland Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
#### JACK H. REMINGTON, PROSECUTOR, v. LAUTER PIANO COMPANY ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Submitted May 12, 1933

Decided October 3, 1933.

Before Justices Pabker, Lloyd and Perskie.

Por the prosecutor, *Herman L. Fast.*

Por the defendants, *Flias A. Xanter.*

Per Curiam.

The state of the case is rather confused, and there is no return to the writ of *certiorari*in proper form. Prom the case and briefs we gather that prosecutor wishes this court to set aside an order in the District Court opening a judgment, and on the ground that the application to open the judgment and allow a new trial was made more than thirty-days after rendition of the judgment. *Comp. Stat., p.*1959, § 17. See *Schubert*v. *District Court,*10 *N. J. Mis. R.*414; 159 *Atl. Rep.*615; *Clarke*v. *Lubin, 4 N. J. Mis. R.*518; 133 *Atl. Rep.*405. The answer is that the application was within the statutory exception, as based on newly discovered evidence.

Assuming there is a record before us, there is no proof on the issue of fact that we should consider. The affidavits for and against allowance of the writ have spent their force. *Linzmayer*v. *Baird,*5 *N. J. Mis. R.*362; 136 *Atl. Rep.*510. This is elementary. Moreover, the evidence taken at the first trial is not presented. *Clarke*v. *Lubin, supra.*In short, there is nothing before us to support the prosecutor’s claim. The writ is dismissed, with costs.