alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
u.s. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REcEIvED 

JUN- 5 2013 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

WORLDWIDE AIRCRAFT 

SERVICES, INC. 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 

HEARING DOCKET 

I DOCKET NO. FAA-2013-0045 

FAA CASE NO. 2009S0150216 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

Respondent 

Joint Section 13.217/Rule 26(f) Report Submitted by Complainant FAA . . ' 

1. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.217 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f), a teleconference was held on 

May 30, 2013, and was attended by (1) William P. Vines, counsel for Complainant, 

and (2) Michael A. Honeycutt for the Respondent. 

2. The parties have agreed to and recommend the following discovery plan: 

a. The parties will exchange the discovery disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(l) by 

Friday, June 28, 2013; 

b. Initial discovery requests will be made by Friday, July 26, 2013. The parties will 

have until August 26, 2013, to respond to initial discovery requests; 

c. Follow-up discovery requests will be made by Friday, September 6, 2013. The 

parties have until September 30, 2013, to respond to follow-up discovery 

requests; 

d. All dispositive motions must be filed by October 15, 2013; responses thereto by 

N own1ber 1, 2013; replies by November 15, 2013; 

e. The hearing should be held in Tampa, Florida. 

:.1 ·,n 

' y '•'" • ' 
3. Settlement has not been discussed, as the Respondent, by way of Mr. Honeycutt, has 

represented to the Complainant that the Respondent would like to appeal the 

Administrator's allegations and violations for review by an Administrative Law 

Judge. 

I "/ ,)4._ ll 

Respectively submitted this 2 (} , day of I !\Pi UJ I ,i I / _L.---· J .i /~ -""---~---~-"-- ! v;· \ ... J 

'2013. 

J 

William Vines 

Counsel for Complainant 

2
Merrimack,

Dec., 1899.

#### Dixon *v.*Guay.

The unauthorized receipt oí a bank-book by a-collecting agent will not operate as payment of the debt, if the transaction is repudiated by the principal within a reasonable time after it is brought to his knowledge.

Action eor Possession, under the landlord and tenant act. Facts found by a referee, as follows: December 1, 1898, the *162plaintiff owned the premises in question, and the deféndant occupied them at a monthly' rental of six dollars per month, payable in advance. At this time she demanded ten dollars per month, which the defendant refused to pay, but did offer her six dollars, which she declined. February 27, 1899, the defendant deposited in the Manchester Savings Bank, in the name of the plaintiff, the sum of twelve dollars, to pay for the January and February rent, taking a book therefor in the name of the plaintiff. On or about March 1, Mrs. Kehoe, a sister of the plaintiff and her agent in this matter, demanded the rent, and the defendant paid her six dollars for the December rent, and gave her the bank-book aforesaid, which she took, saying it was all right. There 'was no evidence that Mrs. Kehoe had authority tq accept anything as payment for rent other than' money, and I find she had no such authority, unless implied as a matter of law. I find, however, that tins book was accepted by Mrs. Kehoe for the rent. Within a reasonable time the plaintiff returned the book to the defendant, who has since had it, and demanded twelve dollars in money for the two months’ rent, which the defendant refused to pay. The plaintiff then served a seven days’ notice to quit on the defendant, which was sufficient to entitle her to possession of the premises unless the receipt of the bank-book, as herein stated, shall be held to be payment of rent for January and February, in which event there is to be judgment for the defendant. The court ordered judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant excepted.

*Sullivan & Broderick,*for the plaintiff.

*David W. Perkins,*for the defendant.

Parsons, J.

“ That the power of a collecting agent by the general law is limited to receiving for the debt of Ms principal that which the law declares to be a legal tender, or wliich is by common consent considered and treated as money, and passes as such at par, is established by all the authorities. The only condition they impose upon the principal, if anything else is received by his agent, is that he shall inform the debtor that he refuses to sanction the unauthorized transaction within a reasonable period after it is brought to Ms knowledge.” *Ward*v. *Smith,*7 Wall. 447, 452; *Todd*v. *Reid,*4 B. & Ald. 210; *Bartlett*v. *Pentland,*10 B. & C. 760; *Howard*v. *Chapman,*4 C. & P. 508; Sto. Ag., *ss.*98, 413.

*Exception overruled. '*

Pike, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

 13 May 2004

(2004/C 136/01)

1 euro == 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
1210-AB32-2-1577.html[7/26/2015 8:19:31 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jxs-tzzr

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2074

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Gail Leppin

General Comment

Department of Labor, Congress AND Executive Branch of Government,

Quit sticking your nose into every part of OUR PRIVATE LIVES, I (WE) do NOT need you telling us WHAT

 we can EAT, HOW to SPEND OUR MONEY, WHEN we should GO TO A DOCTOR OR... WHAT

 TREATMENTS WE MAY NEED, HOW TO PLAN OUR RETIREMENT .

We are smarter than you may think and certainly don't need any help from the CORRUPT Government/

 Government Departments TO PLAN OUR RETIREMENT.

Take your CORRUPT fingers OUT OF OUR MONEY MATTERS, HEALTH CARE, DIET, RETIREMENT

 and anything else you WANT TO/ THINK you should take over in OUR LIVES.
§ 674.39 State Safety Oversight Agency annual reporting to FTA. ( a ) On or before March 15 of each year, an SSOA must submit the following material to FTA: ( 1 ) The SSO program standard adopted in accordance with § 674.27, with an indication of any changes to the SSO program standard during the preceding twelve months;
( 2 ) Evidence that each of its employees and contractors has completed the requirements of the Public Transportation Safety Certification Training Program, or, if in progress, the anticipated completion date of the training;
( 3 ) A publicly available report that summarizes its oversight activities for the preceding twelve months, describes the causal factors of accidents identified through investigation, and identifies the status of corrective actions, changes to Public Transportation Agency Safety Plans, and the level of effort by the SSOA in carrying out its oversight activities;
( 4 ) A summary of the triennial audits completed during the preceding twelve months, and the RTAs' progress in carrying out CAPs arising from triennial audits conducted in accordance with § 674.31;
( 5 ) Evidence that the SSOA has reviewed and approved any changes to the Public Transportation Agency Safety Plans during the preceding twelve months; and
( 6 ) A certification that the SSOA is in compliance with the requirements of this part.
( b ) These materials must be submitted electronically through a reporting system specified by FTA.
Exhibit 32

Written Statement of
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying
with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of WidePoint
Corporation (the Company), hereby certify, based on their knowledge, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 ( the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ STEVE L. KOMAR Steve
L. KomarChief Executive Officer

/s/ JAMES T. MCCUBBIN
James T. McCubbinChief Financial Officer

Date:  August 12, 2004
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6042

JOHN MARTIN SPAULDING,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

J. C. STREEVAL, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Roanoke. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. (7:22-cv-00118-JPJ-PMS)

Submitted: September 19, 2024 Decided: September 24, 2024

Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Martin Spaulding, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6042 Doc: 15 Filed: 09/24/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

John Martin Spaulding, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which Spaulding sought 

to challenge his convictions and sentence by way of the savings clause in 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 

Pursuant to § 2255(e), a prisoner may challenge his conviction and sentence in a petition 

for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to § 2241 only if a § 2255 motion would be inadequate 

or ineffective to test the legality of his detention. In light of the Supreme Court’s decision 

in Jones v. Hendrix, 599 U.S. 465, 477-80 (2023) (holding that petitioner cannot use § 2241

petition to mount successive collateral attack on validity of federal conviction or sentence), 

we conclude that the district court correctly determined that Spaulding cannot pursue his 

claims in a § 2241 petition. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Spaulding

v. Streeval, No. 7:22-cv-00118-JPJ-PMS (W.D. Va. Jan. 9, 2024). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6042 Doc: 15 Filed: 09/24/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsRICIS 1987 Symposium. Executive summaryPapers presented at the RICIS (Research Institute for Computing and Information Systems) of the University of Houston - Clear Lake are compiled. The following subject areas are covered: NASA JSC/UH - Clear Lake cooperative research program; the RICIS concept; RICIS research; and RICIS research areas.Document ID19910009303Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference ProceedingsAuthorsHouston, A. Glen*(Research Inst. for Advanced Computer Science Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1987Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-187906NAS 1.26:187906Accession Number91N18616Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC9-16Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910009303.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle19910009307WorkAn overview of the information management component of RICIS19910009308WorkAn overview of the mathematical and statistical analysis component of RICIS19910009306WorkAn overview of the artificial intelligence and expert systems component of RICIS19910009309WorkAn overview of the education and training component of RICISN91-18617 through N91-18623Workvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 9, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40271 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus OSVALDO REA-HERRERA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-746-ALL

-------------------- Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Osvaldo Rea-Herrera (“Rea”) appeals the 46-month sentence imposed following entry of his guilty plea to a charge of being found illegally in the United States after he had been removed subsequent to his conviction for an aggravated felony. Rea’s sole issue on appeal is a challenge to the validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), and the use of his prior conviction to increase his sentence. Rea asserts for the first time on appeal that the “felony” andNo. 05-40271 -2- “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional because they are treated as sentencing factors rather than as elements of the offense. Rea concedes that his arguments are foreclosed by circuit precedent and admits that he raises the arguments merely to preserve them for Supreme Court review. As Rea concedes, his arguments are foreclosed. See United States v. Izaguirre-Flores , 405 F.3d 270, 277-78 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 253 (2005); United States v. ManciaPerez , 331 F.3d 464, 470 (5th Cir. 2003). The Supreme Court in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000), did not overrule Almendarez-Torres , and we must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Mancia-Perez , 331 F.3d at 470 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

. AFFIRMED.
Soldiers deliver prosthetic limbs to Baghdad hospital
 By Spc. Daniel Schneider , 366th MPAD
  100723prosthetics
 BAGHDAD (July 23, 2010) — Soldiers recently delivered boxes of prosthetic limbs to Adamiyah Hospital here. “We wanted to put these limbs to good use,” said Capt. Gabriela  Niess, with 4th Stryker Brigade Combat Team, 2nd  Infantry Division, and a native of Davis, Calif. “By giving these  prosthetics to a location with capabilities to use them for the people  of Iraq, we keep them from being wasted or sitting in a closet  somewhere.”The 4th Stryker Brigade soldiers worked with the 1st Advise  and Assist Brigade, 3rd Inf. Div., to determine which hospital was the best  prospect to receive the prosthetic limbs, said Maj. Michael Perreault, brigade surgeon.According to Perreault, Maj.  Eric Aguila, squadron surgeon assigned to 2nd Cavalry Squadron, 1st Cav.  Regiment, 4th Stryker Brigade Combat Team, visited Adamiyah Hospital during the past few  weeks. In that time, Aguila brought examples of what was available to  the hospital’s prosthetic section and asked healthcare providers if  there would be a need for prosthetic arms and legs. Through developing a  partnership with the Adamiyah Hospital staff, the Army surgeons  determined this hospital would be the best location to ensure the  prosthetics would be put to good use.“We determined that this hospital was the most capable to help the most Iraqi people using these products,” Niess said.“This  product drop gives the hospital more supplies and assets that they can  use to better support the people of Iraq,” Perreault added. “The doctors  and patients all seemed excited and happy with the new equipment.”Perreault  said he hopes some Iraqis have the opportunity to lead a more-normal  life thanks to this donation provided by U.S. forces.“This  rehabilitation hospital serves about 400 patients a day in everything  from physical therapy to prosthetic limb fitting,” said Perrault. “These  prosthetics can help some of those patients walk again.”
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.9

              NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER SALARIES AND BONUS PAYMENTS

Base Salaries

      The base salaries for 2006 for the executive officers of Heritage
Financial Group (the "Company") and HeritageBank of the South (the "Bank") who
will be named in the compensation table that will appear in the Company's
upcoming 2006 annual meeting proxy statement (the "named executive officers")
are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                  Name and Title                                 Base Salary
<S>                                                              <C>
O. Leonard Dorminey
President and Chief Executive of the Company                      $263,952
Chief Executive Officer of the Company

Carol W. Slappey
President of the Bank                                             $162,282

Tammy W. Burdette
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of           $126,672
the Company and the Bank

O. Mitchell Smith                                                 $124,821
Executive Vice President and Senior Credit Officer of the
Company and the Bank
</TABLE>

Bonus Payments

      The Company has a discretionary bonus plan. In November 2005, the
Compensation Committee authorized a discretionary bonus of 25 % of 2005 base
salary to the named executive officers listed below. In determining this bonus,
the Compensation Committee considered the successful completion of the public
offering and the data processing conversion in 2005 and the Company's earnings
as compared to earnings of regional peers.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
   Name and Title                            Amount of Bonus
   --------------                            ---------------
<S>                                          <C>
O. Leonard Dorminey                              $63,500

Carol W. Slappey                                 $39,000

Tammy W. Burdette                                $30,500
</TABLE>

      In 2005, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company had
authority to approve bonuses to our fourth named executive officer, O. Mitchell
Smith. During 2005, Mr. Smith received a $15,000 signing bonus when he joined
the Company in February and was awarded a 15% of salary, or $16,800
discretionary bonus in December 2005. In 2006, Mr. Smith's bonuses will be
determined by the Compensation Committee.
```

[109th Congress Public Law 109]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ109.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 2350]]

Public Law 109-109
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 2061 South Park Avenue in Buffalo, New York, as the ``James T. Molloy 
     Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Nov. 22, 2005 -  [H.R. 3339]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2061 
South Park Avenue in Buffalo, New York, shall be known and designated as 
the ``James T. Molloy Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James T. Molloy Post Office 
Building''.

    Approved November 22, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3339:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            July 25, 26, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 8, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Home About Us

Water Services Projects Our Clients

Benefits Careers News Home About Us Services Water Wastewater & Recycled Water Stormwater Electrical and I&C Industrial & Institutional Facilities Construction Management (CM) Design-Build Projects Water Treatment Wastewater Treatment and Recycling Water Pump Stations and Reservoirs Wastewater and Stormwater Pump Stations Pipelines Electrical and Instrumentation Construction Management and Resident Inspection Design-Build Engineering Our Clients Careers Benefits Openings Apply Here News Contact Us City of Industry, CA (Headquarters) San Diego, CA Sacramento, CA Walnut Creek, CA Home About Us Services Water Wastewater & Recycled Water Stormwater Electrical and I&C Industrial & Institutional Facilities Construction Management (CM) Design-Build Projects Water Treatment Wastewater Treatment and Recycling Water Pump Stations and Reservoirs Wastewater and Stormwater Pump Stations Pipelines Electrical and Instrumentation Construction Management and Resident Inspection Design-Build Engineering Our Clients Careers Benefits Openings Apply Here News Contact Us City of Industry, CA (Headquarters) San Diego, CA Sacramento, CA Walnut Creek, CA



## Pacheco Pumping Plant (PPP) Upgrading and Adjustable Speed Drive (ASD) Replacement Project Santa Clara Valley Water District San Jose, CA 

# Page 1 of 2 water, LEE & RO, Inc. Pacheco

4/29/ 2014 http://www.lee

- ro.com/pacheco.html

## LEE & RO provided study, design and construction support services for a $14 million electrical & mechanical system

improvement project for the 350 CFS capacity PPP. PPP has twelve (12) main pumps with wound rotor motors rated for 2,000HP each. The existing motor starters/controls are 1970s technology - Toshiba Adjustable Speed Drives (ASDs). The project included replacement of 4,160 volt ASDs with new variable frequency drives (VFDs), testing of the 2,000 hp motor drives per NETA and IEEE requirements, structurally retrofitting the pump gallery to accommodate VFDs, installation of a new flowmeter and RTU and SCADA connections for each of the 12 pump discharge lines, replacing HVAC and chillers, and optimization of pump controls. 

# Page 2 of 2 water, LEE & RO, Inc. Pacheco

4/29/ 2014 http://www.lee

- ro.com/pacheco.html
Docket: EBSA-2010-0007 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in 

Retirement Plans 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0007-0001 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options 

Document: EBSA-2010-0007-DRAFT-0036 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: Michael Grozdanoff 

Address: 

mgrozdano643@bellsouth.net 

Sandy Springs, GA, 

Organization: 404-693-5491 

General Comment 

I oppose this idea. It is not the governments function to manage the financial affairs of citizens. As to a 

"guaranteed lifetime income stream" we are going to have difficulty meeting social security obligations. 

Let us be honest. This is simply a confiscation of private retirement accounts built up over years by 

individuals who chose not to spend everything they made. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: March 01, 2010 

Received: February 20, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80aa8a00 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=Print&PrintId=0900006480aa8a... 3/1/2010