alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
agrmtstlmtrj Ex 10-13






AGREEMENT IN SETTLEMENT OF CONSULTING SERVICES DEBT 




THIS AGREEMENT made as of the 6 th day of March 2004. 




BETWEEN:   Robert C. Jaspar , of Walnut Creek, California     and 




CALIFORNIA NEWS TECH , of 529 Buchanan St., San Francisco, California, 94102 




WHEREAS : 




A. California News Tech, (the "Company") failed to pay its full consulting services expense for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, 2001, and 2000 to its officers. 




B. Robert C. Jaspar ("Officer"), the Company's Secretary, Controller, and Director, has not been paid a total of $76,940 for services rendered to the Company during the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, 2001, and 2000. 




C. The parties desire to enter into an agreement whereby the Company will issue two promissory notes to Officer in consideration for services rendered to the Company. 




NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES THAT in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants hereinafter set-forth, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows: 




1.     The Company hereby agrees to issue two promissory notes to Officer (the first in the amount of $50,640 and the second in the amount of $26,000) in the total amount of $76,940 with zero percent (0%) interest per annum which shall become due and payable on March 6, 2006 in consideration for services rendered to the Company by Officer during the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, 2001, and 2000. 




2.   These Promissory Notes are made in settlement of all professional consulting fees owed to Officer to December 31, 2003 . This note shall not be transferable, assignable, nor collateralized. 




3.   The Company has the right to repay the entire amount due before March 6, 2006 without penalty. Repayment of the first note shall not be made with funds raised from the sale of stock in the initial public offering during the year 2004. Repayment of the second note shall be made in accordance with the use of proceeds statement contained in the year 2004 Initial Public Offering document. 



 

4.  The parties agree to execute and deliver all such further documents, agreements and instruments and take such other and further action as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out the purposes and intent of this Agreement. 




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed on this 4 th day of April, 2004 




California News Tech.                    







/s/ Marian Munz                                                                                                       /s/ Robert C. Jaspar        

By: Marian Munz                  By: Robert C. Jaspar 

Its: President

 

 

 


	 	1
From: Keith Mayfield [mailto:myvoice@oneclickpolitics.com] 

Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 7:41 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Washington should not limit or restrict advice & retirement saving choices

Re: Washington should not limit or restrict advice & retirement saving choices

Dear Department of Labor,

I am a constituent and 401k expert/specialist residing in your district. I want to make you aware of my 

opposition to the proposed rule from the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) that will be detrimental to the 

US retirement saver and my ability to help consumers save for retirement and build a stream of retirement 

income so that they do not outlive their assets. I have always served in the best interests of my clients, 

through financial planning and the implementation of that plan, and the current proposal will limit 

consumer choice and my ability to provide advice accordingly.

I have worked for 20 years specifically in the 401k/403b industry. As a recognized 401k 

expert/specialist, I have worked with around 1,000 local companies to setup and service these retirement 

plans for the benefit of approximately 40,000 to 50,000 local employees. I have tremendous experience 

and insight into what works in getting employees engaged in being successful in their retirement 

planning. Far and away the only successful idea is allowing advisors to educate and communicate directly 

with employees. (As a note, please be aware that normally, I see less than 20% of plan employees ever 

even login to their account, so correctly focused guidance is critical). 

My role as a 401k specialist is to work directly with local Financial Professionals to assist with guidance 

as they work with 401k plans. I can honestly tell you that the majority of financial professionals tell me 

they do not want to work with 401k plans due to low compensation, high volume of work and increasing 

regulatory oversight/issues. The proposed changes will further erode the ability and interest of Financial 

Professionals as the only viably means of effectively assisting employees in this state to create a better 

financial future. 

As both a professional in the retirement planning industry and an everyday consumer, I strongly urge you 

to reach out to Secretary Perez to reevaluate this rule to make certain it protects investors, while 

preserving access to personalized retirement assistance, products and services for all individuals.

Regards,

Keith Mayfield

Sincerely, 

Keith Mayfield 

12523 SE 7th PL

Bellevue, WA 98005 

Constituent 

Prepared by One Click Politics(tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. For information regarding this service, please 

contact admin@oneclickpolitics.com
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

COMARCO, Inc. 

Irvine, California 

We hereby consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-44943, 33-45096, 33-63219, 333-11749, 333-78677, and 333-42350) of Comarco, Inc. of our report dated March 31, 2006 relating to the consolidated balance sheets,statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows as of and for the years ended January 31, 2006 and 2005, and the referenced consolidated financial statement schedule therein, which appears in the January 31, 2006 annualreport on Form 10-K of Comarco, Inc. 

/s/ BDO Seidman LLP 

April 28, 2006
#### Bean, *Adm'r, v.*Christian Church *& a.*

The trustees, deacons, church-wardens, or other similar officers of an unincorporated church, if citizens of the United States, are a corporation for the purpose of taking and holding in succession all real and personal estate given to their church

Bill in Equity, by the administrator of Sarah Sleeper, for instructions as to thé construction of her will, the second item of which is, “I give, bequeath, and devise to the Christian Church of South Danbury, of which I am a member, and the only church there, all the rest, residue, and remainder of my estate, real and personal, wherever situated, to have and to hold forever for a perpetual fund, the use of which shall be annually applied for the support of preaching in said place, under the direction of said church.”

*Shirley £*Carr, for the plaintiff.

*W. T.*Norris, for the defendants.

Doe, C. J.

The trustees, deacons, church-wardens, or other similar officers of the unincorporated Christian Church of 'South Danbury, of which the testatrix was a member, being citizens of the United States, are a corporation for the purpose of taking and holding in succession the real and personal estate given to their church. Mass. Anc. Charters 605; G. L., c. 153, *s.*6; *Holt*v. Downs, 58 N. H. 170. There being no debts, the residue of realty vested in the official corporation at the death of the testatrix. *Lucy*v. Lucy, 55 N. H. 9. The administrator will deliver to them the residue of personalty, and will require no security for the performance of their fiduciary duty.

*Case discharged.*

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
**EXHIBIT 23.3**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**
We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-3 and S-8(No. 33-59641, 33-59643, 33-59645, 333-15537, 333-30125,333-38895, 333-77323, 333-65818, and 333-65846) of CTCommunications, Inc. of our reports dated February 13,2004**,**except for Note 8, as to which the date isMarch 3, 2004, relating to the financial statements of theNorth Carolina RSA 5 Cellular Partnership, North Carolina RSA 15Cellular Partnership, South Carolina RSA No. 3 CellularGeneral Partnership, South Carolina RSA No. 4 CellularGeneral Partnership, South Carolina RSA No. 5 CellularGeneral Partnership, South Carolina RSA No. 6 CellularGeneral Partnership, South Carolina RSA No. 7 CellularGeneral Partnership, and South Carolina RSA No. 9 CellularGeneral Partnership and of our reports dated February 13,2004, except for Note 9, as to which the date is March 3,2004 relating to the financial statements of the South CarolinaRSA No. 2 Cellular General Partnership and South CarolinaRSA No. 8 Cellular General Partnership, which appear in CTCommunication’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for theyear ended December 31, 2003.
 /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP    
Little Rock, ArkansasMarch 8, 2004
§ 382.411 Employer notifications. ( a ) An employer shall notify a driver of the results of a pre-employment controlled substances test conducted under this part, if the driver requests such results within 60 calendar days of being notified of the disposition of the employment application. An employer shall notify a driver of the results of random, reasonable suspicion and post-accident tests for controlled substances conducted under this part if the test results are verified positive. The employer shall also inform the driver which controlled substance or substances were verified as positive.
( b ) The designated employer representative shall make reasonable efforts to contact and request each driver who submitted a specimen under the employer's program, regardless of the driver's employment status, to contact and discuss the results of the controlled substances test with a medical review officer who has been unable to contact the driver.
( c ) The designated employer representative shall immediately notify the medical review officer that the driver has been notified to contact the medical review officer within 72 hours.
08/04/2015 15:33 FAA GLRC 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMJNISTRA TION 

OFFICE OF HEARlNGS 

W ASHJNGTON, D.C. 

In the Matter ofNational Power Corporation 

PAGE 02/03 

201 0-GL-70-0212 

Jad~~~n------------------------------------

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

Now comes the Complainant putsuant to 14 C.F .R § l3.233(a) and appeals the lnitial Decision of 

the Administrative Law Judge in the above captioned case. 

Attomey 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Offi.ce ofthe Chief Counsel, AGC-300 

Enforcement Division, Midwest Team. 

2300 E. Devon Ave. 

Des Plaines, IL 60018 

Phone: 847-294-7862 

Fax: 847-294-7498 
08/04/2015 15:33 8472947498 FAA GLRC PAGE 03/03 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

J hereby certify that tbe foregoing Notice of Appeal has been mailed and faxed to the following: 

And by CERTIFIED MAIL to: 

Attorney Martin A. Blumenthal 

One Northfield P __ I~az=a:,-_s-_u=it~e_::3_::o_::o __________________________ _ ----Grnl*lge,-Ih-&009'_ 
08/04/2015 15:33 8472947498 

To: Hearing Docket, AGC-400 

Company: 

Phone: 

Fax: (202) 493-5020 

From: Kate Barber 

Title: FAA Attorney 

Date: August 4, 2015 

Pages w/cover: 

FAA GLRC PAGE 01/03 

IF·ederal Aviation 

Adm"i,n'istration 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

G real Lakes Reg'1an 

2300 East Devon 

Des Plaines, ll 60018 

Telephone. 847-294-7862 

Fsx No. 847-294-8293 

E-mail: kate.t>arber@faa.gov 

Facsimile 

**************~*******************************************~~***************************~~~******** 

Message: 

Please find attached Complainant's Notice of Appeal in the FAA v. National Power 

Corporation case. Docket No.: CP10GL0212. 

Sincerely, 

Kate Barber
**Exhibit 31.A**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Douglas L. Foshee, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of El Paso CGP Company;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
Date: November 29, 2005                 /s/ Douglas L. Foshee   Douglas L. Foshee    Chairman of the Board,
Nov. 28: Military airstrikes continue against ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq
 
  November 28, 2015
	Release # 20151128-01
	FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **SOUTHWEST ASIA****—** On Nov. 27, coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL 
terrorists in Syria and Iraq. In Syria, coalition military forces 
conducted three strikes using attack and remotely piloted aircraft. 
Separately in Iraq, coalition military forces conducted 17 strikes 
coordinated with and in support of the Government of Iraq using bomber, 
fighter, attack, and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL targets.
	
	The following is a summary of the strikes conducted against ISIL since the last press release:**Syria**
	*  Near Ayn Isa, three strikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL tactical vehicle.**Iraq**
	* 
 Near Al Baghdadi, two strikes destroyed two ISIL rocket rails and 
damaged a third ISIL rocket rail and denied ISIL access to terrain.
	
	*  Near Albu Hayat, one strike struck an ISIL tactical unit.
	* 
 Near Mosul, three strikes struck two separate ISIL tactical units and 
destroyed an ISIL mortar position and four ISIL fighting positions.
	
	* 
 Near Ramadi, seven strikes struck two separate ISIL tactical units and 
destroyed an ISIL home-made explosives cache, an ISIL vehicle, an ISIL 
boat, an ISIL vehicle borne improvised explosive device (VBIED), two 
ISIL buildings, an ISIL heavy machine gun, an ISIL ammo cache, two ISIL 
weapons caches, and an ISIL fighting position.
	
	*  Near Sinjar, four
 strikes struck three separate tactical units and destroyed two ISIL 
fighting positions and three ISIL vehicles.
	
	Strike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely.
	A
 strike, as defined in the CJTF releases, means one or more kinetic 
events that occur in roughly the same geographic location to produce a 
single, sometimes cumulative effect for that location.  So having a 
single aircraft deliver a single weapon against a lone ISIL vehicle is 
one strike, but so is multiple aircraft delivering dozens of weapons 
against a group of buildings and vehicles and weapon systems in a 
compound, for example, having the cumulative effect of making that 
facility (or facilities) harder or impossible to use.  Accordingly, 
CJTF-OIR does not report the number or type of aircraft employed in a 
strike, the number of munitions dropped in each strike, or the number of
 individual munition impact points against a target.
	
	The strikes 
were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to 
eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, 
Syria, and the wider international community.
	
	The destruction of 
ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the group's ability to 
project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have 
conducted strikes in Iraq include Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, 
France, Jordan, Netherlands, United Kingdom, and the United States. 
Coalition nations which have conducted strikes in Syria include 
Australia, Bahrain, Canada, France, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, United
 Arab Emirates, and the U.S.
1210-AB32-2-1227 html[7/24/2015 8:47:42 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvt-bvz2

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1722

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

Organization: No organization

General Comment

I'm already retired, he's only got a year and a few months to go. I don't even think him as the that he is,

 can make a foolish move like this. But thank you, Warren
1210-AB32-2-1598.html[7/26/2015 8:44:21 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jxx-nbi6

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2095

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Chis Stonehouse

General Comment

Do not limit an individual's choice in making investment decisions with their IRA or 401k accounts.
Oct. 25: Military airstrikes continue against ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq
 
  October 25, 2015 
Release # 20151025-01
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **SOUTHWEST ASIA****—** On Oct. 24, coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL 
terrorists in Syria and Iraq. In Iraq, coalition military forces 
conducted 22 strikes coordinated with and in support of the Government 
of Iraq using fighter, attack, bomber, and remotely piloted aircraft 
against ISIL targets. 

The following is a summary of the strikes conducted against ISIL since the last press release:**Iraq**
* Near Bayji, one strike struck a large ISIL tactical unit.
* Near Fallujah, one strike destroyed five ISIL rocket rails.
* 
Near Kisik, eight strikes struck two separate ISIL tactical units and 
destroyed two ISIL fighting positions, four separate ISIL staging areas,
and suppressed an ISIL mortar position and an ISIL heavy machine gun 
position.

* Near Mosul, two strikes struck two separate ISIL 
tactical units and destroyed an ISIL fighting position, an ISIL heavy 
machine gun, and an ISIL vehicle.

* Near Ramadi, five strikes 
struck three separate ISIL tactical units and destroyed ten ISIL 
fighting positions, two ISIL sniper positions, an ISIL vehicle, and an 
ISIL weapons cache, and denied ISIL access to tactical terrain.

* 
Near Sinjar, five strikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed 16 
ISIL fighting positions, seven ISIL assembly areas, and an ISIL cache.

Strike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely. 
The
strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the 
operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose
to Iraq, Syria, and the wider international community. 

The 
destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the group's
ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations 
which have conducted strikes in Iraq include Australia, Belgium, Canada,
Denmark, France, Jordan, Netherlands, United Kingdom, and the United 
States. Coalition nations which have conducted strikes in Syria include 
Australia, Bahrain, Canada, France, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, United
Arab Emirates, and the U.S.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 05475**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 05475\05475_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 05475\05475_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 05475\05475_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 05475\05475_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05475\05475_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05475\05475_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05475\05475_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05475\05475_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 05475\Certification Statement_05475.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 05475\Supporting Documentation\05475_Map-1 Osage.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 05475\Supporting Documentation\05475_Pond-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 05475\Supporting Documentation\05475_Water balance Osage 002.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 05475\Supporting Documentation\Water balance Osage 001.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### § 804.4 Open meetings requirement.

Members shall not jointly conduct or dispose of agency business other than in accordance with this part. Except as provided in § 804.5, every portion of every meeting of the Board shall be open to public observation.