alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 7.28 How does DOT handle requests that concern more than one Government agency? ( a ) If the release of a DOT-created record covered by this subpart would be of concern to DOT and one or more other Federal agencies, the determination as to release is made by DOT, but only after consultation with the other concerned agency.
( b ) If the release of a DOT-created record covered by this subpart would be of concern to DOT and a State, local, or tribal Government, a territory or possession of the United States, or a foreign Government, the determination as to release is made by DOT, but only after consultation with the other concerned Governmental jurisdiction.
( c ) DOT refers a request for a non-DOT-created record covered by this subpart (or the relevant portion thereof) for decision by the Federal agency that is best able to determine the record's exemption status (usually, this is the agency that originated the record), but only if that agency is subject to FOIA. DOT makes such referrals expeditiously and notifies the requester in writing that a referral has been made. DOT informs the requester that the Federal agency to which DOT referred the request will respond to the request, unless DOT is precluded from attributing the record in question to that agency.
( d ) DOT components will handle all consultations and referrals they receive from other agencies or DOT components according to the date the FOIA request initially was received by the first agency or DOT component, not any later date.
From: Bill Vojak [mailto:wvojak@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 4:29 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Comment - lifetime income RFI 

Here's my public comment regarding the "lifetime income RFI" 

KEEP YOUR HANDS OFF OF MY MONEY! 

I VOLUNTARILY SAVED THAT MONEY. IT'S MY MONEY. . NOT YOURS!

William Vojak 

20213 NE 104th Ave 

Battle Ground WA, 98604
§ 595.6 Modifier identification. ( a ) Any motor vehicle repair business that modifies a motor vehicle to enable a person with a disability to operate, or ride as a passenger in, the motor vehicle and intends to avail itself of the exemption provided in 49 CFR 595.7 shall furnish the information specified in paragraphs (a)(1) through (3) of this section to: Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. ( 1 ) Full individual, partnership, or corporate name of the motor vehicle repair business.
( 2 ) Residence address of the motor vehicle repair business and State of incorporation if applicable.
( 3 ) A statement that the motor vehicle repair business modifies a motor vehicle to enable a person with a disability to operate, or ride as a passenger in, the motor vehicle and intends to avail itself of the exemption provided in 49 CFR 595.7.
( b ) Each motor business repair business required to submit information under paragraph (a) of this section shall submit the information not later than August 27, 2001. After that date, each motor business repair business that modifies a motor vehicle to enable a person with a disability to operate, or ride as a passenger in, the motor vehicle and intends to avail itself of the exemption provided in 49 CFR 595.7 shall submit the information required under paragraph (a) not later than 30 days after it first modifies a motor vehicle to enable a person with a disability to operate, or ride as a passenger in, the motor vehicle. Each motor vehicle repair business who has submitted required information shall keep its entry current, accurate and complete by submitting revised information not later than 30 days after the relevant changes in the business occur.
[66 FR 12655, Feb. 27, 2001, as amended at 75 FR 47489, Aug. 6, 2010]
Exhibit
32.2











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of South Jersey
Gas Company (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
David A. Kindlick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ David
A. Kindlick


-------------------------------------------------------


Name:
David A. Kindlick


Title:
Chief Financial Officer


May 12,
2009
ISAF joins President Karzai in condemning the killing of Kandahar City Mayor Ghulam Haidar Hamedi
 By , ISAF Public Affairs Office
  KABUL, Afghanistan (July 27, 2011) — The International Security Assistance Force joins President Karzai in condemning the killing of Kandahar City Mayor Ghulam Haidar Hamedi today. Initial reports indicate that a suicide bomber killed Mayor Hamedi in Kandahar. One other person was reported to have died in the blast. “Mayor Hamedi was a strong leader and voice for a terror-free and progressive Afghanistan and we extend our sympathies to his family and friends at this sorrowful time,” said Rear Admiral Vic Beck, ISAF Director of Public Affairs. “We will work with our Afghan partners to bring to justice those responsible for this despicable killing.”
<PAGE>   1
                 COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                      Exhibit 21 - Schedule of Subsidiaries

As of May 31, 2001, the Company had the following active subsidiaries:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
     Wholly-owned subsidiaries of Comprehensive Care Corporation:               State of Incorporation
     -----------------------------------------------------------                ----------------------
<S>                                                                             <C>
     Comprehensive Behavioral Care, Inc.                                              Nevada

     Wholly-owned subsidiaries of Comprehensive Behavioral Care, Inc.:
     -----------------------------------------------------------------

     Comprehensive Care Integration, Inc.                                             Delaware
     Healthcare Management Services, Inc.                                             Michigan
     Healthcare Management Services of Michigan, Inc.                                 Michigan
     Behavioral Healthcare Management, Inc.                                           Michigan

     Affiliates sponsored by Comprehensive Behavioral Care, Inc.:
     ------------------------------------------------------------

     Comprehensive Provider Networks of Texas, Inc.                                   Texas
</TABLE>
SUPREME COURT.

#### The Poughkeepsie Savings Bank agt. Mary Winn and others.

*Mortgage foreclosure*— *taxes md assessments—rights of pmchaser.*

Where the judgment ordering the premises to he sold expressly provided that the referee should deduct from and pay out of the purchase-money any lien or liens for taxes or assessments, and aonly the balance should be paid to the plaintiff : ■

*Held,*that this provision is equivalent to an express declaration, by the court to the buyer, that he buys free from all liens for taxes.

*Held,*also, that although by. the terms of sale the purchaser was required to present all claims for taxes, and have the same deducted from his bid, he could, if he saw fit, pay to the referee the entire purchase-money, and rely upon the court to carry out its own judgment as to the appli1 cation of the moneys thus paid by him.

Where the purchaser paid to the referee the entire purchase-money, which was by him paid over to plaintiff, leaving certain taxes unpaid:

*Held,*that plaintiff should be compelled to pay the same.

*Ulster Special*Term,

February, 1878.

Motion to compel the plaintiff to pay certain taxes on property purchased at foreclosure sale.

*Wm.*Lawton, for purchaser.

*E. F.*Taylor, for hank.

Westbrook, J.

The judgment ordering the premises to he sold expressly provided that the referee, who conducted the sale, should deduct from and pay out of the purchase-*369money obtained thereon *“*any lien or liens upon said premises so sold at the time of such sale for taxes or assessments,” and that only the balance of such money, remaining after such payments and sundry others required by the judgment, should be paid to the plaintiff. This -provision is equivalent to an express declaration, by the corn’t to the buyer, that he buys free from all liens for taxes.

That certain taxes are unpaid is not controverted, but it is claimed, that under the terms of sale, the purchaser was required to present all claims for taxes, and have the same deducted from his bid. Hot having done so it is argued by the plaintiff, that it may retain the money paid to it though, confessedly, the taxes are unpaid.' The soundness of this position is not seen. The party buying is presumed to know what the judgment required and to rely thereon. It is true that he had the right, by the terms of sale, to ascertain what taxes were outstanding, pay the same, and have the amounts paid credited upon his bid, and for this, such terms of sale expressly provide; but it is also true, that, he could, if he saw fit, pay to the referee the entire purchase-money and rely upon the court to carry out its own judgment as to the application of the money thus paid by him. There is nothing in the terms of sale which compels the buyer to take the premises subject to the taxes due thereon, provided he fails to pay them and have them deducted from his bid upon his settlement with the referee. The clause is for the purchaser’s protection, allowing him to pay if he sees fit, and is not inconsistent with the right to pay over the whole purchase-price, and trust to the referee following the order of the court.

The motion must be granted with costs.
----

NOTICE OF SELECTION PROCEDURE

(2004/C 138/14)

The Secretariat of the European Parliament is organising the following selection procedure:

----

(1)  OJ C A, 18/05/2004 (published in French, English and German)

----
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER****PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Qof webMethods, Inc. (the “Company”) for the periodended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, DavidMitchell, the President and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and     (2) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.       Date: February 14, 2005     /s/ DAVID MITCHELL             Name: David Mitchell
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 213 (Tuesday, November 4, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 65360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26264]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

25 CFR Part 169

[BIA-2014-0001; DR.5B711.IA000814]
RIN 1076-AF20

Rights-of-Way on Indian Land

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Proposed rule; Extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces that the Department will accept 
comments on the proposed rule governing rights-of-way on Indian land 
until November 28, 2014. The proposed rule would comprehensively update 
and streamline the process for obtaining BIA grants of rights-of-way on 
Indian land, while supporting tribal self-determination and self-
governance.

DATES: Comments on the proposed rule published June 17, 2014 (79 FR 
34455) must be received by November 28, 2014.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
    --Federal rulemaking portal: http://www.regulations.gov. The rule 
is listed under the agency name ``Bureau of Indian Affairs.'' The rule 
has been assigned Docket ID: BIA-2014-0001.
    --Email: consultation@bia.gov. Include the number 1076-AF20 in the 
subject line.
    --Mail or hand delivery: Elizabeth Appel, Office of Regulatory 
Affairs & Collaborative Action, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C 
Street NW., MS 3642, Washington, DC 20240. Include the number 1076-AF20 
on the envelope.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Appel, Director, Office of 
Regulatory Affairs & Collaborative Action, (202) 273-4680; 
elizabeth.appel@bia.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 17, 2014, we published a proposed 
rule to comprehensively update and streamline the process for obtaining 
BIA grants of rights-of-way on Indian land. See 79 FR 34455. On August 
18, 2014, we published an extension of the comment period, establishing 
a new comment deadline of October 2, 2014. On October 1, 2014, we 
released a press release notifying the public that we are extending the 
comment period to November 3, 2014, to allow additional time for tribal 
and public comment. On October 30, 2014, we released a press release 
notifying the public that we are again extending the comment period to 
November 28, 2014. We will accept all comments received between June 
17, 2014, and November 28, 2014.
    The proposed rule, frequently asked questions, and other 
information are online at: http://www.bia.gov/WhoWeAre/AS-IA/ORM/RightsofWay/index.htm.

    Dated: October 30, 2014.
Kevin K. Washburn,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2014-26264 Filed 10-31-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4310-W7-P
```
§ 663.37 Post-delivery purchaser's requirements certification. For purposes of this part, a post-delivery purchaser's requirements certification is a certification that the recipient keeps on file that— ( a ) Except for procurements covered under paragraph (c) in this section, a resident inspector (other than an agent or employee of the manufacturer) was at the manufacturing site throughout the period of manufacture of the rolling stock to be purchased and monitored and completed a report on the manufacture of such rolling stock. Such a report, at a minimum, shall— ( 1 ) Provide accurate records of all vehicle construction activities; and
( 2 ) Address how the construction and operation of the vehicles fulfills the contract specifications.
( b ) After reviewing the report required under paragraph (a) of this section, and visually inspecting and road testing the delivered vehicles, the vehicles meet the contract specifications.
( c ) For procurements of: ( 1 ) Ten or fewer buses; or
( 2 ) Procurements of twenty vehicles or fewer serving rural (other than urbanized) areas, or urbanized areas of 200,000 people or fewer; or
( 3 ) Any number of primary manufacturer standard production and unmodified vans, after visually inspecting and road testing the vehicles, the vehicles meet the contract specifications.
[56 FR 48395, Sept. 24, 1991, as amended at 71 FR 14118, Mar. 21, 2006]
Docket: HHS-OS-2010-0015 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Comment On: HHS-OS-2010-0015-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: HHS-OS-2010-0015-0008 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: Mary Goshert 

Organization: Servicecorp 

General Comment 

It doesn't make sense to me that a group health plan would lose its grandfathered status if it selects 

a new insurance carrier. If a group health plan receives a large increase from its existing carrier, it 

should be allowed to shop for a less costly plan that provides the same benefits and retain its 

grandfathered status. This way the employer saves money and the employee saves money in the 

premiums they are required to contribute. 

Why would a group health plan be penalized for this action?

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: August 12, 2010 

Received: June 23, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: July 23, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b07c4c 

Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/ContentViewer?objectId=0900006480b07c... 8/12/2010
IV

House Calendar No. 181

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 463

[Report No. 107–538]

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 26, 2002

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

1 Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on

2 the legislative day of Thursday, June 27, 2002, for the

3 Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the

4 rules relating to the resolution (H. Res. 459) expressing

5 the sense of the House of Representatives that Newdow

6 v. U.S. Congress was erroneously decided, and for other

7 purposes.
House Calendar No. 181

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 463

[Report No. 107–538]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend

the rules.

JUNE 26, 2002

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
EXHIBIT
32





Certification
of Periodic Report by the Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant
to, and for purposes only of, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned hereby certifies
that (i) the Quarterly Report of Shore Bancshares, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Shore Bancshares, Inc.





Date:
      November 5, 2010
            By:
            /s/ W. Moorhead VermilyeW.
      Moorhead VermilyePresident/Chief
      Executive OfficerDate:
      November 5, 2010
            By:
            /s/ Susan E. LeavertonSusan
      E. Leaverton, CPATreasurer/Principal
      Accounting Officer
# Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group supports Operation Inherent Resolve

/ Published Nov. 26, 2019
ARABIAN GULF, 

                An F/A-18F Super Hornet attached to the "Jolly Rogers" of Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 103 launches from the flight deck of the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72). Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group is deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations in support of naval operations to ensure maritime stability and security in the Central Region, connecting the Mediterranean and the Pacific through the western Indian Ocean and three strategic choke points. With Abraham Lincoln as the flagship, deployed strike group assets include staffs, ships and aircraft of Carrier Strike Group 12 (CSG 12), Destroyer Squadron 2 (DESRON 2), USS Leyte Gulf (CG 55) and Carrier Air Wing 7 (CVW 7). (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Jeremiah Bartelt/Released)            

                Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group supports Operation Inherent Resolve            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Jeremiah Bartelt

VIRIN: 191122-N-NF912-176
# U.S. Navy Supports UK Seizure of Iranian Missiles

/ Published July 7, 2022
U.S. Navy Supports UK Seizure of Iranian Missiles, 
A U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyer supported maritime operations conducted by naval forces from the United Kingdom that resulted in the seizure of advanced weapons components during an interdiction in the Gulf of Oman, Feb. 25.Coordinated efforts among USS Gridley (DDG 101), HMS Montrose (F236) and combined air assets led to Royal Navy forces confiscating surface-to-air missiles and cruise-missile rocket engines that originated from Iran, according to a statement released by the United Kingdom, July 7.Small boats attempting to smuggle the weapons were intercepted by the Royal Navy in January and February. Gridley’s crew deployed an MH-60 Seahawk helicopter during the February interdiction to provide overwatch.“We have a decades-long strategic relationship with the Royal Navy,” said Vice Adm. Brad Cooper, commander of U.S. Naval Forces Central Command, U.S. 5th Fleet and Combined Maritime Forces. “Our continued collaboration on maritime interdictions in the Middle East reflects our extraordinary partnership and strong commitment to regional security and stability.”The weapons were seized along routes historically used to traffic weapons unlawfully to Yemen. The direct or indirect supply, sale or transfer of weapons to the Houthis in Yemen violates U.N. Security Council Resolution 2216 and international law.U.S. and UK naval forces regularly conduct regional maritime security operations to disrupt the transport of illicit cargo that can support terrorism and other unlawful activity. U.S. Navy warships operating in the Middle East seized nearly 9,000 illicit weapons in 2021.U.S. Naval Forces Central Command and United Kingdom Maritime Component Command are headquartered in Manama, Bahrain. The two commands regularly partner to foster regional maritime cooperation, safeguard key waterways and uphold international rules-based order.

In a first for the @RoyalNavy,  @HMSMontrose  seized smuggled Iranian missiles in international waters south of Iran. Read more: https://t.co/BTI07Oww9jpic.twitter.com/b6YxuLwbZH
— Royal Navy (@RoyalNavy) July 7, 2022

For more information read below:

https://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/news-and-latest-activity/news/2022/july/07/20220707-montrose-arms-cache
Merchant Vessel Seized by IRGCN in Gulf of Oman
 
  By U.S. Naval Forces Central Command Public Affairs
  On April 27 at approximately 1:15 p.m. 1ocal time, Marshall Islands-flagged oil tanker Advantage Sweet was seized by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy (IRGCN) while transiting international waters in the Gulf of Oman. The oil tanker issued a distress call during the seizure. U.S. 5th Fleet is monitoring the situation.
Iran’s actions are contrary to international law and disruptive to regional security and stability. The Iranian government should immediately release the oil tanker.
Iran’s continued harassment of vessels and interference with navigational rights in regional waters are a threat to maritime security and the global economy. In the past two years, Iran has unlawfully seized at least five commercial vessels sailing in the Middle East.