alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAtmospheric water vapor transport: Estimation of continental precipitation recycling and parameterization of a simple climate modelThe advective transport of atmospheric water vapor and its role in global hydrology and the water balance of continental regions are discussed and explored. The data set consists of ten years of global wind and humidity observations interpolated onto a regular grid by objective analysis. Atmospheric water vapor fluxes across the boundaries of selected continental regions are displayed graphically. The water vapor flux data are used to investigate the sources of continental precipitation. The total amount of water that precipitates on large continental regions is supplied by two mechanisms: (1) advection from surrounding areas external to the region; and (2) evaporation and transpiration from the land surface recycling of precipitation over the continental area. The degree to which regional precipitation is supplied by recycled moisture is a potentially significant climate feedback mechanism and land surface-atmosphere interaction, which may contribute to the persistence and intensification of droughts. A simplified model of the atmospheric moisture over continents and simultaneous estimates of regional precipitation are employed to estimate, for several large continental regions, the fraction of precipitation that is locally derived. In a separate, but related, study estimates of ocean to land water vapor transport are used to parameterize an existing simple climate model, containing both land and ocean surfaces, that is intended to mimic the dynamics of continental climates.Document ID19910018381Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeThesis/DissertationAuthorsBrubaker, Kaye L.*(Massachusetts Inst. of Tech. Cambridge, MA, United States)*Entekhabi, Dara*(Massachusetts Inst. of Tech. Cambridge, MA, United States)*Eagleson, Peter S.*(Massachusetts Inst. of Tech. Cambridge, MA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1991Subject CategoryMeteorology And ClimatologyReport/Patent NumberR91-18MIT-TR-333NASA-CR-188647NAS 1.26:188647Accession Number91N27695Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG5-743Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910018381.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.235 What are the requirements for proper use and care of ASDs? ( a ) As an ASD manufacturer, you must submit, for NHTSA approval, a QAP for your ASD before NHTSA approves it and ODAPC places the device on its Web page for “Approved Screening Devices to Measure Alcohol in Bodily Fluids”. Your QAP must specify the methods used for quality control checks, temperatures at which the ASD must be stored and used, the shelf life of the device, and environmental conditions (*e.g.,* temperature, altitude, humidity) that may affect the ASD's performance.
( b ) As a manufacturer, you must include with each ASD instructions for its use and care consistent with the QAP. The instructions must include directions on the proper use of the ASD, and, where applicable the time within which the device must be read, and the manner in which the reading is made.
( c ) As the user of the ADS (*e.g.,* employer, STT), you must follow the QAP instructions.
( d ) You are not permitted to use an ASD that does not pass the specified quality control checks or that has passed its expiration date.
( e ) As an employer, with respect to breath ASDs, you must also follow the device use and care requirements of § 40.233 .
[65 FR 79526, Dec. 19, 2000, as amended at 82 FR 52246, Nov. 13, 2017]
June 30, 2016



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ANDREW T. VO, INDIVI DUALLY AND D/B/A LAR RY VO, VIET LE, TAM

VAN LE AND VO

- LE, INC. , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00994

- CV V.

HO KIM DOAN , Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Ho Kim Doan, sig ned, September 16, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant, Andrew T. Vo, Individually and d/b/a Larry Vo, Viet Le, Tam Van Le and Vo

- Le, Inc., jointly and severally, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
§ 831.56 Request to withhold information. ( a ) *Applicability.* This section applies to information the NTSB receives from any source that may be subject to the Trade Secrets Act (18 U.S.C. 1905) or the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA, 5 U.S.C. 552).
( b ) *Disclosure.* The NTSB is authorized by 49 U.S.C. 1114(b) to disclose, under certain circumstances, confidential commercial information that would otherwise be subject to penalties for disclosure under the Trade Secrets Act, or excepted from disclosure under FOIA. The NTSB may exercise this authority when disclosure is necessary to support a key finding, a safety recommendation, or the NTSB's statement of probable cause of a major marine casualty or a marine casualty.
( c ) *Disclosure procedures.* Information submitted to the NTSB that the submitter believes qualifies as a trade secret or as confidential commercial information subject either to the Trade Secrets Act or Exemption 4 of FOIA must be so identified by the submitter on each page that contains such information. In accordance with 48 U.S.C. 1114(b), the NTSB will provide the submitter of identified information (or information the NTSB has reason to believe qualifies as subject to the Trade Secrets Act or Exemption 4 of FOIA) the opportunity to comment on any disclosure contemplated by the NTSB. In all instances in which the NTSB decides to disclose such information pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 1114(b) or 5 U.S.C. 552, the NTSB will provide at least 10 days' notice to the submitter.
( d ) *Voluntarily provided safety information.* ( 1 ) The NTSB will not disclose safety-related information voluntarily submitted to the NTSB if the information is not related to the exercise of the NTSB's investigation authority, and if the NTSB finds disclosure of the information might inhibit the voluntary provision of that type of information.
( 2 ) The NTSB will review voluntarily provided safety information for confidential content, and will de-identify or anonymize any confidential content referenced in its products.
( e ) *Other.* Any person may make written objection to the public disclosure of any other information, such as interview summaries or transcripts, contained in any report or document filed, or otherwise obtained by the Board, stating the grounds for such objection. The Board, on its own initiative or if such objection is made, may order such information withheld from public disclosure when, in its judgment, the information may be withheld under the provisions of an exemption to the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552, see part 801 of this chapter), and its release is found not to be in the public interest.
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 29 April 2004

in Case C-359/01 P: British Sugar plc v Tate & Lyle plc, Napier Brown & Co. Ltd and Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Appeal - Competition - Sugar market - Article 85(1) of the EC Treaty (now Article 81(1) EC) - Agreement - Effect on trade between Member States - Fine - Proportionality)

(2004/C 118/23)

Language of the case: English

In Case C-359/01 P: appeal by British Sugar plc, established in Peterborough (United Kingdom), (Lawyers: T. Sharpe QC and D. Jowell, barrister, and A. Nourry, solicitor) against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Fourth Chamber) of 12 July 2001 in Joined Cases T-202/98, T-204/98 and T-207/98 Tate & Lyle and Others v Commission [2001] ECR II-2035, seeking the annulment of that judgment, the other parties to the proceedings being: Tate & Lyle plc, established in London (United Kingdom), Napier Brown & Co. Ltd, established in London (United Kingdom), applicants at first instance, Commission of the European Communities (Agents: K. Wiedner, assisted by N. Khan, barrister) — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of: P. Jann, acting for the President of the Fifth Chamber, C.W.A Timmermans and S. von Bahr (Rapporteur), Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 29 April 2004, in which it:

----

(1)  OJ C 317, 10.11.2001.

----
§ 599.512 Hearing location and costs. ( a ) Unless the party requests a hearing at which the party appears before the Hearing Officer in Washington, DC, the hearing shall be held telephonically. The hearing is held at the headquarters of the U.S. Department of Transportation in Washington, DC.
( b ) The Hearing Officer may transfer a case to another Hearing Officer at a party's request or at the Hearing Officer's direction.
( c ) A party is responsible for all fees and costs (including attorneys' fees and costs, and costs that may be associated with travel or accommodations) associated with attending a hearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,504
<SECURITIES>                                    87,884
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,139
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,329
<INVENTORY>                                     17,025
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,904
<PP&E>                                         334,187
<DEPRECIATION>                                 112,536
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 671,051
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,495
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,688
<OTHER-SE>                                     233,719
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   671,051
<SALES>                                        205,567
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               209,124
<CGS>                                          126,128
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  126,128
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                53,865
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,800
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,220
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,111
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,387
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,724
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,724
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.48


</TABLE>
----

(2004/C 88 E/0425)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2571/03

by Maurizio Turco (NI) to the Commission

(6 August 2003)

Subject:   Violations of freedom of religion in Azerbaijan

Given that:

In view of the excellent relations of cooperation existing between the EU and Azerbaijan, can the Commission state whether it is aware of the above facts and indicate what initiatives, in the context of the cooperation relationship, could constitute an effective and workable means of inducing Azerbaijan to ensure respect for freedom of religion?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(18 September 2003)

The Commission is aware of the arrest of Mr Ismailov and Mr Musayev.

The Commission is of the opinion that dialogue with Azerbaijan within the Partnership and Cooperation framework will provide the best mechanism for addressing the issues to which the Honourable Member refers. Therefore, it is proposed to raise the general issue of freedom of belief with the Azerbaijani authorities at the earliest opportunity.

The Commission is working actively with the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Office for Democratic Institutions on promoting human rights in Azerbaijan.

----
Air Force chief of staff visits Pakistan
 By None  , U.S. Embassy, Islamabad, Pakistan
  100626wreath
 ISLAMABAD (June 26, 2010) – U.S. Air Force Gen. Norton Schwartz, U.S. Air Force Chief of Staff, visited the Pakistan Air Force Headquarters here today and met with Air Chief Marshal Rao Qamar Suleman, Pakistan Air Force Chief of Air Staff, and other senior PAF officials. During his visit, the general placed a wreath on the PAF Martyrs’ Monument to honor the sacrifices made by Pakistan’s security forces and citizens in their fight against violent extremists.
<PAGE>

                                           Exhibit (21)-2
                                           Commonwealth Edison Company
                                           Form 10-K File No. 1-1839


                              Commonwealth Edison
                          Subsidiaries of the Company
                          ---------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                              State or
                                                            Jurisdiction
                                                             in Which
                                                            Incorporated
                Name                                        or Organized
------------------------------------------------            ------------
<S>                                                         <C>
Commonwealth Edison Company                                 Illinois
  Commonwealth Edison Company of Indiana, Inc.              Indiana
  ComEd Financing I (Subsidiary Trust)                      Delaware
  ComEd Financing II (Subsidiary Trust)                     Delaware
  ComEd Funding, LLC                                        Delaware
     ComEd Transitional Funding Trust                       Delaware
  Commonwealth Research Corporation                         Illinois
  Concomber Ltd.                                            Bermuda
  Edison Development Company                                Delaware
  Edison Development Canada Inc.                            Canada
     Edison Finance Partnership                             Canada
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 294 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     November 27, 2001.
Whereas the House of Representatives recently found it necessary to close its 
        office buildings to Members, staff, and the public due to the presence 
        of Anthrax;
Whereas the Comptroller General made an offer to the House of Representatives to 
        make the General Accounting Office's building and equipment available to 
        the Members and staff of the House of Representatives during the period 
        in which the House office buildings were closed, an offer the House 
        gratefully accepted;
Whereas the House's subsequent temporary use of General Accounting Office 
        workspaces, telephones, computers, and other equipment imposed an 
        inconvenience on the employees of the Office, who graciously vacated 
        their worksites; and
Whereas the sacrifices made by employees of the General Accounting Office during 
        this period enabled the House of Representatives to continue its 
        legislative work on behalf of the people of the United States: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives expresses its gratitude to the 
General Accounting Office for accommodating the House during the recent closure 
of the House office buildings, and sincerely thanks the hundreds of General 
Accounting Office employees who generously vacated their workspaces and 
otherwise helped to make it possible for the work of the House to continue 
during this period.
    Sec. 2. The Clerk of the House of Representatives shall transmit a copy of 
this resolution to the Comptroller General of the United States.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 456

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3884) to amend the Internal

Revenue Code of 1986 to prevent corporations from avoiding the United

States income tax by reincorporating in a foreign country.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 24, 2002

Mr. MALONEY of Connecticut submitted the following resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3884) to amend

the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prevent corporations from avoiding the United States income tax by

reincorporating in a foreign country.

1 Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this

2 resolution the House shall without intervention of any

3 point of order consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3884)

4 to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prevent

5 corporations from avoiding the United States income tax

6 by reincorporating in a foreign country. The bill shall be

7 considered as read for amendment. The previous question

8 shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on any
2

HRES 456 IH

1 amendment thereto to final passage without intervening

2 motion except:

3 (1) five hours of debate on the bill equally di4 vided and controlled by the chairman and ranking

5 minority member of the Committee on Ways and

6 Means;

7 (2) an amendment offered by Representative

8 Neal of Massachusetts or his designee, which shall

9 be in order without intervention of any point of

10 order (except those arising under clause 7 of rule

11 XVI), shall be considered as read, and shall be sepa12 rately debatable for 30 minutes equally divided and

13 controlled by the proponent and an opponent;

14 (3) an amendment in the nature of a substitute

15 offered by Representative Thomas of California or

16 his designee, which shall be in order without inter17 vention of any point of order (except those arising

18 under clause 7 of rule XVI), shall be considered as

19 read, and shall be separately debatable for two hours

20 equally divided and controlled by the proponent and

21 an opponent; and

22 (4) one motion to recommit with or without in23 structions.

24 SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 3884 pursuant

25 to the first section of this resolution, notwithstanding the
3

HRES 456 IH

1 operation of the previous question, the Chair may post2 pone further consideration of the bill to a time designated

3 by the Speaker on the same legislative day or until the

4 following legislative day when consideration shall resume

5 immediately after the third daily order of business under

6 clause 1 of rule XIV.

Æ
Page 1 of 1

‘KEGC- IWGP) -05

FEE 5 210
LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION
PUBLICATION As of: Feb 05, 2010
BRANCE DOL ATIONS Received: February 03, 2010

Status: Posted
PUBLIC SUBMISSION Prestes: Feorary 05, 2010
‘Comments Due: May 03, 2010)
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0006
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants & Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Comment On: IRS-2010-0006-0001
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Document: IRS-2010-0006-0016
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-02028

Unknown 3 . .
Submitter Information

General Comment

At retirement, the retiree should have an option to take it as a lump sum or to have it annuitized
in monthly payments. Information and advice for which option is best for them is available to be
able to make an intelligent decision. If they take the lump sum they still have the option of
purchasing an annuity with part or all of it, or investing it. CD's and T-bills give you a feeling of
security knowing that YOU have control of your money. You have no assurance that the company
won't go under, delay payments, or just stop paying or funding their company retirement plans.
BUT IT SHOULD BE THE RETIREE'S DECISION TO CHOOSE!!

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 2/5/2010
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to the requirement setforth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), James M. Gower, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), and Ryan D.Maynard, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.                                     The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 30, 2010, to which this Certification is attachedas Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theExchange Act, and

 

2.                                     The information contained in the Periodic Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

In Witness Whereof, the undersignedhave set their hands hereto as of November 2, 2010.

 
| /s/ JAMES M. GOWER      |   | /s/ RYAN D. MAYNARD                                   |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
| James M. Gower          |   | Ryan D. Maynard                                       |
| Chief Executive Officer |   | Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

This certification accompanies theForm 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities andExchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filingof Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, asamended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether madebefore or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any generalincorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----