alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 23







CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
(Form S-8 No. 33-42543 dated August 30, 1991) pertaining to the Cognitronics 
Corporation 1967 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Registration Statements  
(Form S-8 No. 33-42544  dated August 30, 1991 and Form S-8 No. 333-05897 dated 
June 13, 1996) pertaining to the Cognitronics Corporation 1990 Stock Option 
Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-05899 dated June 13, 
1996) pertaining to the Cognitronics Corporation Restricted Stock Plan of our 
report dated March 10 , 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial 
statements of Cognitronics Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.

                                        /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Stamford, Connecticut
March 24 , 1997[ARTICLE] 5
### -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 36 38 40 42 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/03 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 03 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
# March 27 Red Sea Update

/ Published March 27, 2024

March 27, 2024Release Number 20240327 - 01 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla. –**Between 2:00 and 2:20 a.m. (Sanaa time) on March 27, United States Central Command successfully engaged and destroyed four long-range unmanned aerial systems (UAS) launched by Iranian-backed Houthi terrorists in Yemen. These UAS were aimed at a U.S. warship and engaged in self-defense over the Red Sea. There were no injuries or damage reported to U.S. or coalition ships.

It was determined these weapons presented an imminent threat to merchant vessels and U.S. Navy ships in the region. These actions are taken to protect freedom of navigation and make international waters safer and more secure for U.S. Navy and merchant vessels.
#### § 236.405 Track signaled for movements in both directions, change of direction of traffic.

On track signaled for movements in both directions, occupancy of the track between opposing signals at adjacent controlled points shall prevent changing the direction of traffic from that which obtained at the time the track became occupied, except that when a train having left one controlled point reaches a section of track immediately adjacent to the next controlled point at which switching is to be performed, an aspect permitting movement at not exceeding restricted speed may be displayed into the occupied block.
Insurgent rocket attack kills 3 children
 By Sgt Brent Powell , CJTF-101
  100816_rocket
 DAM ABAD, Afghanistan (Aug. 16, 2010) — It was a morning filled with tragedy, tears and grievance for the local villagers here when an insurgent rocket landed in their village Aug. 14, killing three small children and injuring their mother.“This morning three insurgent rockets were launched toward Camp Salerno,” said U.S. Army Capt. Anthony Clark, commander of the base defense force, Task Force Red Knight, 3rd Brigade, 101st Airborne Division. “One of the rockets struck the village near the base, killing two Afghan girls, ages 4 and 5, and injuring a third girl, as well as their mother. The other two rockets were ineffective.”About 15-minutes after the attack, villagers brought the injured seven-year-old Afghan girl to the Forward Operating Base Salerno main gate, seeking medical assistance for her.Soldiers immediately took the girl to the Salerno Combat Support Hospital, where medical professionals exhausted all efforts to keep her alive. Unfortunately, the girl’s injuries were too severe, and she did not survive.“When the hospital staff told me the young girl had died, I took her [body] back to her family in the village,” said Sharif, a local resident and Khowst Provincial Force commander for the FOB Salerno area, who prefers to use only one name for security reasons. “When I arrived at the village, everyone was upset and absolutely outraged at the terrible attack. People were very angry that innocent children had been killed.”As Sharif continued, he struggled to fight back tears. “This was an attack not just against the village, but against humanity,” he said. “It’s an attack against our country, our people and our religion. We feel so badly for the family of the children and for all the villagers affected by this.”Scout Weapons Team aircraft from Task Force Viper, 1st Battalion, 3rd Aviation Regiment, were in the area when the rocket attacks occurred and were able to spot several other rockets on the ground that had not been fired. They immediately notified the explosive ordinance disposal team. EOD then recovered and destroyed the remaining rockets.The children’s deaths come just three days after the beginning of Afghanistan’s most religious time of year, the month of Ramadan. It is an Islamic celebration held in honor of the month in which “Allah” or “God” revealed the Quran to the Prophet Mohammed. Although he hopes that today’s heart-breaking events will never be repeated, Sharif has a message for those responsible.“If I could speak to the insurgents who did this, I would tell them that our country has seen enough war,” he said. “We’ve been at war for more than 30-years now. Too many families have suffered and lost loved ones. Come sit down with Afghan government officials and tell them what you want. Tell them your problems and work together to solve them. All these terrible acts you are doing are only hurting your people and your country.”
#### § 599.100 Purpose.

This part establishes requirements and procedures implementing the program authorized under the Consumer Assistance to Recycle and Save Act of 2009.
----

**EXHIBIT      32.5**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906**

**OF      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August                    8, 2006 | By:    | /s/                  W. Douglas Hobbs    |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|                                              |   | W.                  Douglas Hobbs        |
|                                              |   | President                  and           |
|                                              |   | Chief                  Executive Officer |
Docket: EBSA-2010-0007 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in 

Retirement Plans 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0007-0001 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options 

Document: EBSA-2010-0007-DRAFT-0058 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Address: XX, 

General Comment 

Keep your hands off private investors IRA and 401(k) accounts. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: March 29, 2010 

Received: March 26, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80ac9faf 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=Print&PrintId=0900006480ac9f... 3/29/2010
To:

Cc:

Bcc:

Subject: Question regarding: Peer Review Process for New Directions in Atmospheric 

Environment Journal

Regarding the Carbon Monoxide ISA:

A public commenter asked why a particular article had not been included in the CO ISA . It was unclear 

whether or not the study had been peer-reviewed. The New Directions journal manager was not able to

definitively confirm that the article had been peer-reviewed.

From: Bethan Keall <newdirections@live.co.uk>

To: Tom Luben/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 05/18/2011 08:21 AM

Subject: RE: Question about New Directions in Atmospheric Environment

Dear Dr Luben

Thank you for your email.

In answer to your query, most New Direction submissions undergo the peer-review process.

Unfortunately I am unable to comment on the paper by Pedersen et al., as we no longer have any 

records for this submission, seeing as it dates back to 2004.

Kind regards

Sue Hurren

Journal Manager

To: newdirections@live.co.uk

Subject: Question about New Directions in Atmospheric Environment

From: Luben.Tom@epamail.epa.gov

Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 14:36:39 -0400

Do submissions for New Directions undergo a peer-review process? 

Specifically, I am interested in the paper: Pedersen CB, Raaschou-Nielson O, Hertel O, Mortensen PB. 

2004. New Directions: Air pollution from traffic and schizophrenia risk . Atmospheric Environment 38: 

3733-3734.

Thank you, 

Tom Luben, Ph.D., MSPH

Senior Epidemiologist

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

National Center for Environmental Assessment 

Telephone: 919-541-5762

E-mail: luben.tom@epa.gov
§ 588.4 Definitions. ( a ) *Statutory definitions.* All terms defined in section 102 of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 1391) are used in their statutory meaning.
( b ) *Motor Vehicle Safety Standard definitions.* Unless otherwise indicated, all terms used in this part that are defined in the Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, part 571 of this subchapter (hereinafter “the Standards”), are used as defined in the Standards.
( c ) *Definitions used in this part.* *Child restraint system* is used as defined in S4 of 49 CFR 571.213, *Child Restraint Systems.*
*Factory-installed built-in child restraint system* is used as defined in S4 of 49 CFR 571.213.
*Owners* include purchasers.
*Registration form* means the form provided with a child restraint system in compliance with the requirements of 49 CFR 571.213, and any communication from an owner of a child restraint to the manufacturer that provides the restraint's model name or number and the owner's name and mailing address.
§ 563.11 Information in owner's manual. ( a ) The owner's manual in each vehicle covered under this regulation must provide the following statement in English: This vehicle is equipped with an event data recorder (EDR). The main purpose of an EDR is to record, in certain crash or near crash-like situations, such as an air bag deployment or hitting a road obstacle, data that will assist in understanding how a vehicle's systems performed. The EDR is designed to record data related to vehicle dynamics and safety systems for a short period of time, typically 30 seconds or less. The EDR in this vehicle is designed to record such data as: • How various systems in your vehicle were operating; • Whether or not the driver and passenger safety belts were buckled/fastened; • How far (if at all) the driver was depressing the accelerator and/or brake pedal; and, • How fast the vehicle was traveling. These data can help provide a better understanding of the circumstances in which crashes and injuries occur. NOTE: EDR data are recorded by your vehicle only if a non-trivial crash situation occurs; no data are recorded by the EDR under normal driving conditions and no personal data (e.g., name, gender, age, and crash location) are recorded. However, other parties, such as law enforcement, could combine the EDR data with the type of personally identifying data routinely acquired during a crash investigation. To read data recorded by an EDR, special equipment is required, and access to the vehicle or the EDR is needed. In addition to the vehicle manufacturer, other parties, such as law enforcement, that have the special equipment, can read the information if they have access to the vehicle or the EDR.
( b ) The owner's manual may include additional information about the form, function, and capabilities of the EDR, in supplement to the required statement in § 563.11(a).
Kyrgyz parliament approves Manas Air Base agreement
 By Donna Miles , American Forces Press Service
  
 WASHINGTON (June 25, 2009) – The Kyrgyz parliament Thursday ratified an agreement between the United States and Kyrgyzstan to extend U.S. access to Manas Air Base, a key logistics hub that supplies troops in Afghanistan, Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman confirmed. The agreement must now go to Kyrgyz President Kurmanbek Bakiev for signature. “It’s not a done deal until the president signs it,” Whitman said. “Out of respect for their processes, we’ve been trying to give them the time and space to give this the consideration that it needs.” The agreement provides for a transit center at Manas International Airport, operated by the United States, to provide logistical support to coalition forces in Afghanistan. About 15,000 troops and 500 tons of cargo move through the base every month, and the base’s importance has increased as more troops deploy into Afghanistan. Officials said on background that the United States agreed to pay $60 million a year to use the base, up from $17.4 million under the previous arrangement. Today’s vote, if approved by the president, reverses Kyrgyzstan’s previous decision to end the arrangement the United States and Kyrgyzstan entered three years ago that gave the U.S. annual renewal rights through July 2011. Kyrgyzstan’s foreign ministry notified the U.S. Embassy in the Kyrgyz capital of Bishkek in February that it had six months to leave Manas. “We think it’s to our mutual benefit,” Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell told Pentagon reporters yesterday in anticipation of the parliament’s vote. “They obviously have a great stake in what’s happening in that region, as do we. And we look forward to continuing to work, with them to supply our troops in Afghanistan so that we can help with the overall security.”
A friend in Balad
 By Senior Airman Joel Mease , 379th Air Expeditionary Wing Public Affairs
  SOUTHWEST ASIA – Senior Airman Carlos Cassano, 379th Expeditionary Logistics Readiness Squadron, receives a visit from Balad March 13 at the 379th Expeditionary Medical Group Clinc. Cassano said Balad was a nice treat to break up some time. As a trained therapy dog, Balad is able to visit patients at the 379th Expeditionary Medical Group Clinic and gives the379th EMDG the distinction of having the first therapy dog program in the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility. (U.S. Air Force photo/Senior Airman Joel Mease)
 SOUTHWEST ASIA (March 15, 2013) — Standing on all four paws, he weighs just a few pounds, but his energy and affinity to get people to smile is immeasurable. Trained therapy dog, “Balad”, makes his rounds visiting service members across the 379th Air Expeditionary Wing since November. His “parents,” Melvin and Melissa DeVane, wanted a way to brighten the mood of service members, who don’t normally get to see a domesticated dog in a deployed environment. “It was just a way to try to bring a little morale booster to the deployed members, and Balad just loves meeting new people,” said Mr. DeVane, who is the site manager for a contract here. “It’s just a little touch of home being able to interact with Balad and it breaks up the monotony of being in this deployed location.” Because Balad is a trained therapy dog, he is also able to visit the clinic to see patients. “Most members are just super excited to be able to pet Balad and when he does his tricks everybody smiles,” said Mrs. Devane. “While patients and hospital staff are more than happy to see him during one of his visits, the one who really gets excited is Balad,” she added. “The staff always makes us feel welcome and the patients really enjoy the break, and of course Balad loves being the star,” Mrs. DeVane said. “He loves it, first he gets to go for a ride and then when we get to the gate he starts whining excitedly because he knows he’s going to get lots of attention,” Mr. DeVane said. “It’s funny on the way home he always looks so content and then crawls into the back seat and sleeps until we arrive home.” One of the reasons the DeVanes believes their dog is so popular around the installation is that he reminds service members of home. “After receiving a visit from Balad, they normally just thank us and tell us how much they enjoyed it, then of course they tell us about their pet that they left back home and how much they miss them and can’t wait to return home to their families,” Mrs. DeVane said. Balad is also willing to visit other service members around the installation. All they have to do is ask, Mr. DeVane said. “It’s nice to be able to bring a little enjoyment into people’s lives and share our blessings,” Mr. DeVane said. “Folks can contact Balad on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/balad.devane to request a visit, see pictures and leave comments.”
EXHIBIT 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    This annual report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Comarco, Inc.
 Date: May 3, 2010
    /s/ SAMUEL M. INMAN, IIISamuel M. Inman, IIIChief Executive Officer
Order filed, July 11, 2014

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________
NO. 14

- 14

- 00433

- CV

____________ RAPID SETTLEMENTS, L TD. , Appellant

V.

SETTLEMENT FUNDING, LLC D/B/A PEACHTREE SETTLEMENT FUNDING AND SIMMIE B ERNARD KING , Appellee

On Appeal from the 113th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2006

- 23366B



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due July 01, 2014. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not
been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Sheri Ullrich , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

.
PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 440 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 13, 2002.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4019) to provide that the marriage penalty 
relief provisions of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 
2001 shall be permanent. The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on any 
amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate on the bill equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; (2) the amendment in 
the nature of a substitute printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 
accompanying this resolution, if offered by Representative Rangel of New York or 
his designee, which shall be in order without intervention of any point of 
order, shall be considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for one 
hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) 
one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Skip to main content  end of header   Business Help Site
 You are here: Census.gov  › Business Help Site  Select A Survey MONTHLY Advance Monthly Sales for Retail and Food Services (MARTS)
Building Permits Survey (BPS)
Construction Progress Reporting Survey (CPRS)
Manufacturers' Shipments, Inventories, and Orders Survey (M3)
Manufactured Housing Survey
Monthly Retail Trade Survey (MRTS)
Monthly Wholesale Trade Survey (MWTS)  PERIODIC SURVEYS Economic Census
Economic Census Industry Classification Report

Commodity Flow Survey
Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey (MECS)
Management And Organizational Practices Survey (MOPS)
Rental Housing Finance Survey (RHFS)
Small Business Lending Survey
 QUARTERLY Business and Professional Classification Survey
Quarterly Financial Report (QFR)
Quarterly Survey of Plant Capacity Utilization
Quarterly Services Survey (QSS)
 ANNUAL Annual Business Survey
Annual Capital Expenditures Survey
Annual Retail Trade Report
Annual Services Report
Annual Survey of Entrepreneurs
Annual Survey of Manufactures
Annual Wholesale Trade Report
Building Permits Survey (BPS)
Business Enterprise Research and Development (BERD) Survey
Management and Organizational Practices Survey - Hospitals
Manufacturers' Unfilled Orders Survey (M3UFO)
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
Report of Organization
Survey of State Government Research & Development
 CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. William H. Woodward, Appellant, *v.*Andrew S. Draper, as Commissioner of Education for the State of New York, Respondent.

*People ex rel. Woodward*v. *Draper,*142 App. Div. 102, affirmed.

(Argued May 31, 1911;

decided June 16, 1911.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 20, 1911, which confirmed a determination of the defendant in removing the relator from the office of school commissioner.

*Charles B. Sullivan*for appellant.

' *Frank B. Gilbert*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Gray, Haight, Werner, Chase and Collin, JJ. Dissenting: Willard Bartlett, J. Not voting: Cullen, Oh. J,
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

Received: January 19, 2016

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1k0-8nh4-ygdn

Comments Due: January 19, 2016

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2015-0017

Claims Procedure for Plans Providing Disability Benefits

Comment On: EBSA-2015-0017-0001

Claims Procedure for Plans Providing Disability Benefits

Document: EBSA-2015-0017-DRAFT-0049

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-29295

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I am making a few general comments on ERISA specifically regarding the appeal process as it 

relates to disability claims.

Under the ERISA provisions today, I feel that employees are given a sense of false security that 

they are covered in the case that they become disabled. Until someone experiences this process, 

they are not aware of the limitations placed on them. The playing field with disability policies 

that are part of an employee benefit should be closely aligned with those of a private disability 

policy. If they are not, there should be a full disclosure made to the employee upfront and not 

lurking inside the Summary Plan Description document. I am quite certain that employees are 

not aware of the high standards of needing to show that a claim was "capricious and arbitrarily" 

denied. 

I would like to add that a majority of people who are affected by the ERISA review process are 

not aware of these changes or are not cognitively able to interpret them. I happened to stumble 

across the changes by accident.