alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Aug. 22: Military airstrikes continue against ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published Aug. 22, 2015

August 22, 2015Release # 20150822FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**SOUTHWEST ASIA -** On Aug. 21, coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq. In Syria, coalition military forces conducted five airstrikes using attack and fighter aircraft. Separately in Iraq, coalition military forces conducted 22 airstrikes coordinated with the government of Iraq using attack, bomber, fighter and fighter-attack and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL targets.The following is a summary of the strikes conducted against ISIL since the last press release:**Syria*** Near Al Hasakah, one airstrike destroyed four ISIL fighting positions.* Near Al Hawl, three airstrikes struck an ISIL bunker and destroyed two ISIL excavators.* Near Kobani, one airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL fighting position.**Iraq*** Near Al Baghdadi, one airstrike destroyed an ISIL weapons cache.* Near Bayji, four airstrikes struck one large and one small ISIL tactical units and terrain features denying ISIL a tactical advantage and destroyed five ISIL buildings, two ISIL heavy machine guns and two ISIL vehicles.* Near Habbaniyah, one airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL vehicle.* Near Haditha, one airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed two ISIL boats, an ISIL heavy machine gun and an ISIL mortar system.* Near Kisik, two airstrikes struck two ISIL staging areas.* Near Mosul, four airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit, two ISIL rocket firing positions and an ISIL mortar firing position and destroyed two ISIL fighting positions, an ISIL heavy machine gun and an ISIL vehicle.* Near Ramadi, two airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL weapons cache.* Near Sinjar, one airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed two ISIL fighting positions.* Near Sultan Abdallah, one airstrike struck an ISIL mortar firing position and destroyed an ISIL fighting position.* Near Tal Afar, two airstrikes struck two ISIL mortar firing positions and destroyed an ISIL fighting position and an ISIL heavy machine gun.* Near Tuz, three airstrikes destroyed 11 ISIL fighting positions, two ISIL vehicles and ISIL engineer equipment.Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely.The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria and the wider international community.The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Iraq include Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Syria include Bahrain, Canada, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and the U.S.
----

COUNCIL DECISION

of 29 April 2004

adjusting the basic salaries and allowances applicable to Europol staff

(2004/C 114/04)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Having regard to the Council Act of 3 December 1998 laying down the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees (1), (hereinafter referred to as ’Staff Regulations’), and in particular Article 44 thereof,

Having regard to the initiative of Ireland (2),

Having regard to the Opinion of the European Parliament (3),

Having regard to the review of remuneration of officials of Europol by the Management Board of Europol,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Staff Regulations are hereby amended as follows:

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Article 3

This Decision shall take effect on the day following its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 29 April 2004

For the Council

The President

M. McDOWELL

----

(1)OJ C 26, 30.1.1999, p. 23. Act as last amended by Act of 19 December 2002 (OJ C 24, 31.1.2003, p. 1).

(2)OJ C 34, 7.2.2004, p.16.

(3)  Delivered on 9 March 2004 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

(4)OJ C 152, 26.06.2003, p. 7.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 388 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 142
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 388

                          [Report No. 107-411]

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 476) to amend title 18, 
  United States Code, to prohibit taking minors across State lines in 
circumvention of laws requiring the involvement of parents in abortion 
                               decisions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 16, 2002

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 476) to amend title 18, 
  United States Code, to prohibit taking minors across State lines in 
circumvention of laws requiring the involvement of parents in abortion 
                               decisions.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 476) to amend title 18, United States Code, to 
prohibit taking minors across State lines in circumvention of laws 
requiring the involvement of parents in abortion decisions. The bill 
shall be considered as read for amendment. The previous question shall 
be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) two hours of debate on the bill equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on the Judiciary; and (2) one motion to recommit.

                                                 House Calendar No. 142

107th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 388

                          [Report No. 107-411]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 476) to amend title 18, 
  United States Code, to prohibit taking minors across State lines in 
circumvention of laws requiring the involvement of parents in abortion 
                               decisions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 16, 2002

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
EXHIBIT
10.13(d)







Amendment
No. 1 to that certain Convertible Note dated as of July 29, 2004
(“Note”).





For good
and valuable consideration, the parties to the Note agree and confirm to amend
the Note to extend the First Maturity Date from June 1, 2008 to January 1,
2009.





Except as
set forth above, the Note is hereby ratified and confirmed in all
respects.








Dated:
March 27, 2008
  By:        /s/ William
Salek
 Name:  
William Salek
 Title:    
Chief Financial Officer
    /s/ William
Pagano
From: Glenn Kantor [mailto:GKantor@kantorlaw.net] 

Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 7:35 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB39

It has come to my attention that there is discussion about delaying the effective date of the DOL’s ERISA 

claims regulations. As a lawyer working in the ERISA disability field, I am very much opposed to any 

action that would delay the January 1, 2018 effective date. I can’t understate how important these 

regulations are to the Administration’s promised goal of Making America Great Again. 

It is my understanding the DOL already assessed and took into consideration the potential increase in 

cost of the regulations – so I do not view this as a legitimate basis for any further delay. Considering I 

have litigated over 250 ERISA disability cases over the past decade, I can attest that the new regulations 

will reduce litigation and reduce the costs of the cases that do end up being litigated. This is because the 

regulations put in place common sense rules that facilitate a productive, full, and fair “administrative” 

process during the claim submission and appeal period. As it currently stands, many ERISA claims

administrators shirk their fiduciary responsibilities (perhaps motivated by the financial conflict of 

interest all too common for claims administrators who are usually for-profit insurance companies 

obligated to make a profit for their shareholders). 

Considering “ERISA imposes higher-than-marketplace quality standards” on claims administrators, the 

regulations set to go into effect January 1, 2018 simply bring more clarity to the standards that need to 

be met to fulfill an already existing responsibility. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Glenn, 554 U.S. 105, 115 

(2008). If this causes costs or litigation to rise (which it should not), it is simply evidence that, prior to 

the new regulations, claims administrators were not abiding by the law already in place.

Glenn R. Kantor

19839 Nordhoff Street

Northridge, California 91324

Gkantor@kantorlaw.net

818-886-2525

Fax 818-350-6251
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe Merging of Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics Concepts: A Historical PerspectiveThe seventh Jerry L. Swedlow Memorial Lecture presents a review of some of the technical developments, that have occurred during the past 40 years, which have led to the merger of fatigue and fracture mechanics concepts. This review is made from the viewpoint of 'crack propagation.' As methods to observe the 'fatigue' process have improved, the formation of fatigue micro-cracks have been observed earlier in life and the measured crack sizes have become smaller. These observations suggest that fatigue damage can now be characterized by 'crack size.' In parallel, the crack-growth analysis methods, using stress-intensity factors, have also improved. But the effects of material inhomogeneities, crack-fracture mechanisms, and nonlinear behavior must now be included in these analyses. The discovery of crack-closure mechanisms, such as plasticity, roughness, and oxide/corrosion/fretting product debris, and the use of the effective stress-intensity factor range, has provided an engineering tool to predict small- and large-crack-growth rate behavior under service loading, conditions. These mechanisms have also provided a rationale for developing, new, damage-tolerant materials. This review suggests that small-crack growth behavior should be viewed as typical behavior, whereas large-crack threshold behavior should be viewed as the anomaly. Small-crack theory has unified 'fatigue' and 'fracture mechanics' concepts; and has bridged the cap between safe-life and durability/damage-tolerance design concepts.Document ID19970013996Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsNewman, James C., Jr.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1997Subject CategoryMetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:110310NASA-TM-110310Accession Number97N17544Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 538-02-10-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970013996.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 7.29 When and how does DOT consult with submitters of commercial information? ( a ) If DOT receives a request for a record that includes information designated by the submitter of the information as confidential commercial information, or that DOT has some other reason to believe may contain information of that type (see § 7.23(c)(4)), DOT notifies the submitter expeditiously and asks the submitter to submit any written objections to release (unless paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section apply). At the same time, DOT notifies the requester that notice and an opportunity to comment are being provided to the submitter. To the extent permitted by law, DOT affords the submitter a reasonable period of time to provide a detailed statement of any such objections. The submitter's statement must specify all grounds for withholding any of the information. The burden is on the submitter to identify with specificity all information for which exempt treatment is sought and to persuade the agency that the information should not be disclosed.
( b ) The responsible DOT component, to the extent permitted by law, considers carefully a submitter's objections and specific grounds for nondisclosure prior to determining whether to disclose commercial information. Whenever DOT decides to disclose such information over the objection of a submitter, the office responsible for the decision provides the submitter with a written notice of intent to disclose, which is sent to the submitter a reasonable number of days prior to the specified date upon which disclosure is intended. The written notice to the submitter includes: ( 1 ) A statement of the reasons for which the submitter's disclosure objections were not accepted;
( 2 ) A description of the commercial information to be disclosed; and
( 3 ) A specific disclosure date.
( c ) The notice requirements of this section do not apply if: ( 1 ) DOT determines that the information should not be disclosed;
( 2 ) The information lawfully has been published or otherwise made available to the public; or
( 3 ) Disclosure of the information is required by law (other than 5 U.S.C. 552).
( d ) The procedures established in this section do not apply in the case of: ( 1 ) Information submitted to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and addressed in 49 CFR part 512.
( 2 ) Information contained in a document to be filed or in oral testimony that is sought to be withheld pursuant to Rule 12 of the Rules of Practice in Aviation Economic Proceedings (14 CFR 302.12).
( 3 ) Information submitted to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration and addressed in 49 CFR 389.9.
( e ) Whenever a requester brings suit seeking to compel disclosure of confidential commercial information, the responsible DOT component promptly notifies the submitter. The submitter may be joined as a necessary party in any suit brought against DOT or a DOT component for nondisclosure.
[79 FR 16209, Mar. 25, 2014, as amended at 82 FR 21139, May 5, 2017]
Editorial Note on Part 587
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 587 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 587.14 Deformable face component dimensions and material specifications. The dimensions of the deformable face are illustrated in Figure 1 of this subpart. The dimensions and materials of the individual components are listed separately below. All dimensions allow a tolerance of ±2.5 mm (0.1 in) unless otherwise specified. ( a ) Main honeycomb block. ( 1 ) *Dimensions.* The main honeycomb block has a height of 650 mm (25.6 in) (in the direction of honeycomb ribbon axis), a width of 1,000 mm (39.4 in), and a depth of 450 mm (17.7 in)(in the direction of honeycomb cell axis).
( 2 ) *Material.* The main honeycomb block is constructed of the following material. The honeycomb is manufactured out of aluminum 3003, with a foil thickness of 0.076 mm (0.003 in) ±0.004 mm (0.002 in) a cell size of 19.14 mm (0.75 in), a density of 28.6 kg/m3 (1.78 lb/ft3) ±2kg/m3 (0.25 1b/ft3), and a crush strength of 0.342 MPa (49.6 psi) + 0%−10%, measured in accordance with the certification procedure described in § 587.15.
( b ) Bumper element honeycomb. ( 1 ) *Dimensions.* The bumper element honeycomb has a height of 330 mm (13 in)(in the direction of honeycomb ribbon axis), a width of 1,000 mm (39.4 in), and a depth of 90 mm (3.5 in) (in the direction of honeycomb cell axis).
( 2 ) *Material.* The bumper element honeycomb is constructed of the following material. The honeycomb is manufactured out of aluminum 3003, with a foil thickness of 0.076 mm (0.003 in) ±0.004 mm (0.0002 in), a cell size of 6.4 mm (0.25 in) ±1 mm (0.040 in), a density of 82.6 kg/m3 (5.15 lb/ft3) ±3 kg/m3 (0.19 lb/ft3), and a crush strength of 1.711 MPa (248 psi) + 0% −10%, measured in accordance with the certification procedure described in § 587.14.
( c ) Backing sheet. ( 1 ) *Dimensions.* The backing sheet has a height of 800 mm (31.5 in), a width of 1,000 mm (39.4 in), and a thickness of 2.0 mm (0.08 in) ±0.1 mm (0.004 in).
( 2 ) *Material.* The backing sheet is manufactured out of aluminum 5251/5052.
( d ) Cladding sheet. ( 1 ) *Dimensions.* The cladding sheet of the main honeycomb block has a total length of 1,700 mm (66.9 in), a width of 1,000 mm (39.4 in), and a thickness of 0.81 mm (0.03 in) ±0.07 mm (0.003 in). It is shaped as indicated in Figure 1.
( 2 ) *Material.* The cladding sheet of the main honeycomb block is manufactured out of aluminum 5251/5052.
( e ) Bumper element honeycomb facing sheet. ( 1 ) *Dimensions.* The bumper facing sheet has a height of 330 mm (13 in), a width of 1,000 mm (39.4 in), and a thickness of 0.81 mm (0.03 in) ±0.07 mm (0.003 in).
( 2 ) *Material.* The bumper element honeycomb facing sheet is manufactured out of aluminum 5251/5052.
( f ) Adhesive. The adhesive used throughout is a two-part polyurethane. (such as Ciba-Geigy XB5090/1 resin with XB5304 hardener, or equivalent).
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1504.html[7/23/2015 12:25:45 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-p11f

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1504

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Ed Clark

Address:

902 S. Dakota Avenue, Apt 5A

Tampa, 33606

Email: ed.clark@rockwellcollins.com

Phone: 7278042298

General Comment

DOL Rep:

I do not want the Federal Govt placing restrictions on or controls on my 401K. I'm perfectly capable of planning

 for and control of my own retirement.

J Edwin Clark
U.S., Israel Complete Unmanned Naval Exercise in Gulf of Aqaba
 
  By U.S. Naval Forces Central Command Public Affairs |
  Forces from U.S. 5th Fleet completed a four-day exercise with Israel in the Gulf of Aqaba, May 11, that focused on unmanned systems and artificial intelligence integration into maritime operations.
The exercise, called Digital Shield, included members of U.S. 5th Fleet's unmanned systems and artificial intelligence task force, Task Force 59, as well as a MANTAS Devil Ray T-38 unmanned surface vessel. U.S. forces trained alongside Israeli counterparts during maritime awareness and vessel boarding drills.
“By working together to advance unmanned systems innovation we can enhance regional security and strengthen our collective ability to address emerging threats,” said Capt. Colin Corridan, Task Force 59’s commander.
NAVCENT established Task Force 59 in September 2021 to integrate new unmanned systems and artificial intelligence into U.S. naval operations across the Middle East. Since its launch, the task force has operated a suite of new unmanned systems from regional hubs in Bahrain and Aqaba, Jordan.
Task Force 59 also conducted a Digital Shield exercise last September with Israeli naval forces. The task force regularly trains and operates with maritime partners in the Middle East to accelerate the integration of cutting-edge unmanned technology into daily operations.
U.S. 5th Fleet’s area of operations encompasses approximately 2.5 million square miles of water area and includes the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, Red Sea, parts of the Indian Ocean and three critical choke points at the Strait of Hormuz, Suez Canal and Strait of Bab al Mandeb.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 356

Supporting the goals and ideas of North American Occupational Safety and

Health Week.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 5, 2002

Mr. HYDE (for himself, Mr. CRANE, Mr. EVANS, Mr. JOHNSON of Illinois, Mr.

LAHOOD, and Mr. KIRK) submitted the following resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

RESOLUTION

Supporting the goals and ideas of North American

Occupational Safety and Health Week.

Whereas every year, more than 6,000 people die from job-related injuries and millions more suffer occupational injuries or illnesses;

Whereas every day of the year, millions of people go to and

return home from work safely due, in part, to the efforts

of many unsung heroes—the occupational safety, health,

and environmental professionals who work day in and

day out identifying hazards and implementing safety advances in all industries, at all workplaces (whether on the

road, in the air, on the waters, or on the rails) at reducing workplace fatalities and injuries;
2

•HRES 356

Whereas these safety professionals work to prevent accidents,

injuries, and occupational diseases, create safer work and

leisure environments, and develop safer products;

Whereas the more than 30,000 members of the 90-year-old

nonprofit American Society of Safety Engineers, based in

Des Plaines, Illinois, are safety professionals committed

to protecting people, property, and the environment globally;

Whereas the American Society of Safety Engineers, in partnership with the Canadian Society of Safety Engineers,

has designated May 5 through 11, 2002, as North American Occupational Safety and Health Week; and

Whereas the purposes of North American Occupational Safety and Health Week are—

(1) to increase employees’, employers’, and the

public’s understanding of the benefits of investing in occupational safety and health;

(2) to raise the awareness of the role and contribution of safety, health, and environmental professionals;

and

(3) to reduce workplace injuries and illnesses by increasing awareness and implementation of safety and

health programs: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) supports the goals and ideas of North

3 American Occupational Safety and Health Week;

4 (2) commends safety professionals for their on5 going commitment to protecting people, property,

6 and the environment; and
3

•HRES 356

1 (3) encourages all industries, organizations,

2 community leaders, employers, and employees to

3 support educational activities aimed at increasing

4 awareness of the importance of preventing illness,

5 injury, and death in the workplace.

Æ