alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.19


 


AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO
WARRANT


 


Reference is made to that certain Warrant, issued to
Stuart Benson effective as of April l, 2002 and Amendment No. 1 thereto dated
April 3, 2003, which Warrant entitles Mr. Benson to purchase 1,340,000 shares
of Vital Living, Inc.’s (the “Company”) common stock subject to certain
anti-dilution.


 


The Warrant shall be deemed amended in the following
respects:


 


(i)                                     The
Preamble and Section 1 of the Warrant shall be deemed amended by changing the
number of Shares covered to 6,130,000.


 


(ii)                                  Section
8 of the Warrant shall be amended and restated as follows:


 


“This Warrant may be assigned, in whole or in part, at
any time or from time to time, to any bona fide third party, provided that such
transfer is in compliance with all applicable state and federal securities
laws.”


 


(iii)                               Section 10 of the Warrant shall be
amended and restated by eliminating Section 10(b), retaining only
Section 10(a) as follows:


 


10.                                 Effect
of Stock Split, etc.


 


(a)                                            If the Company, by stock split, stock
dividend, reverse split, reclassification of shares, or otherwise, changes as a
whole the outstanding Common Stock into a different number or class of shares,
then: (1) the number and/or class of shares as so changed shall, for the
purposes of this Warrant, replace the shares outstanding immediately prior to
the change; and (2) the Warrant purchase price in effect, and the number of
shares purchasable under this Warrant, immediately prior to the date upon which
the change becomes effective, shall be proportionately adjusted (the price to
the nearest cent). Irrespective of any adjustment or change in the Warrant
purchase price or the number of shares purchasable under this or any other
Warrant of like tenor, the Warrants therefore and thereafter issued may
continue to express the Warrant purchase price per share and the number of
shares purchasable as the Warrant purchase price per share and the number of
share purchasable were expressed in the Warrant when initially issued.


 


This
Amendment shall be effective as of the August 21, 2003.


 


	
   

  	
  Vital Living, Inc.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Bradley Edson

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Stuart Benson
-----Original Message----- 

From: lisansimon@earthlink.net [mailto:lisansimon@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 7:40 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Lisa Nemeth Simon 

2519 Ridgeview Ave. 

Los Angeles, CA 90041
Page | of 1

MAR 3 200

RECN 808! ~04

Ay

As of: March 30, 2010
Received: March 29, 2010
Status: Posted
PUBLIC SUBMISSION [rostes: naren 30, 2010
Comments Due: May 03, 2010
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0006
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants & Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Comment On: IRS-2010-0006-0001
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Document: IRS-2010-0006-0059
Comment on FR Doc # N/A

Submitter Information

Name: Deborah Ann Harrison
Address:
230 Haze Hyde Hollow Road
Bethpage, TN, 37022-8533
Email: buggyworks@nctc.com
Phone: 615-841-3656

General Comment

I have a defined pension thru Paccar,Inc. after 15 yrs of service I get 520.00 a month. It never
goes up, all profits from investments go to the company instead. I can take early retirement at
age 54 with a 36% penalty, which equals about 200.00 a month I could get. Out medical is only
good for 2 years after retirement, then you buy your own. Our company was closed 12-01-2009,
at the Madison, TN. plant. No severance was offered or relocation or anything else. This closing
effected over 1200 employees. We had UAW Local 1832 as our representatives.

Thank you for your time.

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 3/30/2010
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 328

Expressing the sense of Congress that, during this holiday season, peace

may prevail in the Middle East.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 20, 2001

Ms. KAPTUR submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on International Relations

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that, during this holiday

season, peace may prevail in the Middle East.

Whereas Christians, Jews, and Muslims look to this season

as a holiday time to celebrate and reflect on the highest

aspirations of humankind;

Whereas the holy places of these religions are jeopardized by

continued conflict;

Whereas this holiday season presents an opportunity for renewal and hope;

Whereas acts of violence have replaced acts of peace in Israel

and the Palestinian territories; and

Whereas a sincere desire for peace is held by a vast majority

of those residing in the troubled region: Now, therefore,

be it
2

HRES 328 IH

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives, That the

2 House—

3 (1) expresses its deepest sorrow over the loss of

4 innocent lives; and

5 (2) expresses its deepest hope for a time of re6 flection and a sustainable peace for all parties dur7 ing this holiday season and for the year to come.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 4 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                       January 3, 2001.
    Resolved, That the Clerk be instructed to inform the President of the United 
States that the House of Representatives has elected J. Dennis Hastert, a 
Representative from the State of Illinois, Speaker; and Jeffrey J. Trandahl, a 
citizen of the State of South Dakota, Clerk of the House of Representatives of 
the One Hundred Seventh Congress.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
§ 1.300 OMB responsibilities. OMB is responsible for: ( a ) Issuing and maintaining the guidance in this subtitle, as described in § 1.230;
( b ) Interpreting the policy requirements in this subtitle;
( c ) Reviewing Federal agency regulations implementing the requirements of this subtitle, as required by Executive Order 12866;
( d ) Conducting broad oversight of government-wide compliance with the guidance in this subtitle; and
( e ) Performing other OMB functions specified in this subtitle.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ERIC ALLEN,

Petitioner

v.

SECURITY MAJOR JOHN DOE
NEWBERRY, ET AL.,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 751 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11th day of May, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
MARKWAYNE MULLIN ENERGY AND COMMERCE COMMITTEE

2No DistRict, OKLAHOMA SUBCOMMITTEES.
COMMERCE, MANUFACTURING, AND TRADE

1113 Lonawortn House OFnice BuiLoia * ENERGY ano Power

“Sanur Congress of the United States Samanta

1. Choctaw, Sure 175

Metgiera2a-595) House of Representatives
3109 AzaLea Park Dave

Musxocee, OK 74401 Washington, BC 20515-3602

(918) 687-2533

August 31, 2015

The Honorable Thomas E. Perez
Secretary

U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20210

Dear Secretary Perez,

I write in opposition to the Department of Labor’s (DOL) proposed rule (RIN 1210-AB32) that
would change the regulatory definition of a “fiduciary” under the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act (ERISA).

1 have heard from constituents who fear that the “fiduciary” rule proposal will change how
Americans seek help to make their investment decisions in such a way that will only act as a
hindrance to seeking sound financial advice and the relationships that they might currently have
with their financial advisor.

Moreover, | believe the proposed rule as currently written is unworkable, will result in less choice
for consumers, and would have an adversarial impact on the retirement savings advice market on
the whole. The proposed rule imposes further burdens on those individuals who have existing
relationships with their financial advisors. 1 believe that it is vitally important for Americans saving
for retirement to have access to quality information from individuals whom they trust.

Given the many concerns from stakeholders and bipartisan members in Congress on this issue, I
respectfully request that you make specific changes to the “fiduciary” rule to ensure that it does not
bring harm to the retirement savings advice market while protecting all Americans saving for
retirement.

Requested changes include: 1) explicitly clarify that the sale of proprietary products and receipt of
differential compensation are consistent with the Impartial Conduct Standards required under the
BICE and revised PTE 84-24; 2) remove “without regard to” language from Dep't. of Labor 80 Fed.
Reg. 21,927, 21987, and 22020 (proposed April 20, 2015) and insert language that ensures
consistency with the existing ERISA duty of loyalty under Section 404; and 3) DOL should provide
clear guidance and examples regarding compliant sales practices regarding the sale of proprietary
products and receipt of differential compensation.

PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER


Should you have any questions regarding this request, please contact my Washington, D.C. office at
(202) 225-2701.

Singerely, HM jf,

Markwaygé Mullin
Member of Congress
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 519 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 519

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1343) to provide Federal 
assistance to States and local jurisdictions to prosecute hate crimes, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 9, 2002

 Mr. Conyers submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1343) to provide Federal 
assistance to States and local jurisdictions to prosecute hate crimes, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this resolution the 
Speaker shall, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House 
resolved into the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the 
Union for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1343) to provide Federal 
assistance to States and local jurisdictions to prosecute hate crimes, 
and for other purposes. General debate shall be confined to the bill 
and shall not exceed 60 minutes equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Judiciary. The 
first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. After general debate 
the bill shall be considered for amendment under the 5-minute rule. 
During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the 
Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis 
of whether the member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed 
in the portion of the Congressional Record for that purpose in clause 8 
of rule XVIII.
    Sec. 2. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for 
amendment, the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House 
with such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendment thereto to 
final passage without intervening motion, except one motion to recommit 
with or without instructions.
    Sec. 3. If the Committee of the Whole rises and reports that it has 
come to no resolution on the bill, then on the next legislative day the 
House shall, immediately after the third daily order of business under 
clause 1 of rule XIV, resolve into the Committee of the Whole for 
further consideration of the bill.
                                 <all>
```
months prior to Sarb making the request. With respect to the second

client, Sarb appeared at a hearing on behalf of the client in December 2011, even though he was suspended from the practice of law. In both matters, Sarb failed to respond to numerous attempts by the clients to ascertain the status of their cases, failed to personally inform them that he was terminating his representation, and failed to propel their pending matters forward in a diligent manner.

Sarb failed to respond to the State Bar's complaints alleging the foregoing. 

### See SCR 105(2) (if an attorney fails to respond to a State Bar complaint, the charges shall be deemed admitted). The matters were consolidated and proceeded to a hearing. Although he was personally served with notice of the hearing, Sarb did not appear or otherwise participate in the proceeding.

The panel found that Sarb violated RPC 1.3 (diligence), RPC 1.4 (communication), RPC 1.5 (fees), RPC 1.16 (declining or terminating representation), RPC 5.5 (unauthorized practice of law), RPC 8.1(b) (bar admission and disciplinary matters), and RPC 8.4(c) and (d) (misconduct). While the panel found Sarb's lack of a prior disciplinary record a mitigating factor, it also found the following aggravating factors: a pattern of misconduct, multiple offenses, refusal to acknowledge the wrongful nature of his conduct, substantial experience in the practice of law, and indifference to making restitution. SCR 102.5. Based on these findings, the panel recommended that Sarb be disbarred from the practice of law in Nevada. A disciplinary panel's recommendation of disbarment is subject to automatic review by this court. SCR 105(3)(b). Although persuasive, the panel's findings and recommendations are not binding on

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2
(0) 1947AGibbons

Hardesty

Pickering


### QAA Parraguirre

Cherry Douglas

Saitta

3 SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA J.

this court. 

### In re Discipline of Schaefer, 117 Nev. 496, 515, 25 P.3d 191, 204 (2001). This court must review the record de novo and exercise its independent judgment with respect to what type of discipline, if any, is warranted. 

### Id. The panel's findings of misconduct must be supported by clear and convincing evidence. 

### Id.

As Sarb failed to answer or otherwise respond to the State Bar's complaints, the charges are deemed admitted, SCR 105(2), and we conclude that clear and convincing evidence supports the panel's findings. Additionally, the State Bar's recommended discipline is appropriate in light of the nature of Sarb's misconduct and apparent abandonment of his law practice.

Accordingly, we disbar Sarb from the practice of law in Nevada. Such disbarment is irrevocable. SCR 102(1). Sarb shall pay the costs of the disciplinary proceedings within 30 days of receipt of the Nevada State Bar's bill of costs. 

### See SCR 120.

It is so ORDERED.

(01 1947A

### cc: Phillip J. Pattee, Assistant Bar Counsel Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada John H. Sarb Jeffrey Albregts, Chair, Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board Perry Thompson, U.S. Supreme Court Admissions Office

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 

### 4
(0) 194 Th e
Independent Auditors' Report


The Board of Directors
QVC, Inc.:

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of QVC, Inc. and subsidiaries as
of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31,
1996 and for the eleven-month period ended December 31, 1995 (such consolidated
financial statements are not separately presented herein). These consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of QVC, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1996 and for the
eleven-month period ended December 31, 1995, in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.



/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
January 31, 1997
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 969

To provide that Executive Order 13166 shall have no force or effect, and

to prohibit the use of funds for certain purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 8, 2001

Mr. STUMP (for himself, Mr. PAUL, Mr. TANCREDO, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr.

NORWOOD, Mr. RILEY, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. COBLE, Mr. BARTLETT of

Maryland, Mr. KING, Mr. TRAFICANT, Mr. GOODE, Mr. EVERETT, Mr.

DEAL of Georgia, Mr. BAKER, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. FLAKE, Mr.

ISTOOK, Mr. CRANE, Mr. CALLAHAN, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. HOSTETTLER, Mr. RYUN of Kansas, Mrs. ROUKEMA, Mrs.

CUBIN, Mr. COLLINS, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. HANSEN, and

Mr. BURTON of Indiana) introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To provide that Executive Order 13166 shall have no force

or effect, and to prohibit the use of funds for certain

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NULLIFICATION OF EFFECT OF EXECUTIVE

4 ORDER.

5 Executive Order 13166, ‘‘Improving Access to Serv6 ices for Persons with Limited English Proficiency’’ (Au-
2

•HR 969 IH

1 gust 16, 2000; 65 Fed. Reg. 50121), is null and void and

2 shall have no force or effect.

3 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST USE OF FUNDS FOR CER4 TAIN PURPOSES.

5 No funds appropriated pursuant to any provision of

6 law may be used to promulgate or enforce any executive

7 order that creates an entitlement to services provided in

8 any language other than English.

Æ
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 512

Honoring the Indian American Friendship Council.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 26, 2002

Mr. PALLONE (for himself and Mr. BROWN of Ohio) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

RESOLUTION

Honoring the Indian American Friendship Council.

Whereas the Indian American Friendship Council was founded in January 1990 with a commitment to promoting relations between the United States and India, the two

largest democracies in the world;

Whereas since its inception, the Indian American Friendship

Council has been successful in carrying out its mission of

improving United States-India relations, supporting developing countries, promoting global democracy, protecting the interests of the Indian-American community,

and educating Members of Congress;

Whereas over the years, the Indian American Friendship

Council has been the Indian-American organization in the

vanguard of representing the Indian-American commu-
2

•HRES 512 IH

nity and fostering relationships between Members of Congress and Indian-Americans nationwide;

Whereas, in particular, the Council has been instrumental in

moving forward efforts ranging from rebuilding Gujurat

following the disastrous earthquake, to supporting the

fight against terrorism following the September 11, 2001,

attacks in the United States and the December 13, 2001,

attack on the Indian Parliament;

Whereas as the Indian American Friendship Council continues to honor its mission for years to come, it is only

under the outstanding leadership of Dr. Krishna Reddy,

founder and president of the Indian American Friendship

Council, that the Council will continue to be as successful

as it has been since its creation; and

Whereas the Members of the Indian American Friendship

Council and its friends pay tribute to Dr. Reddy’s dedicated service, expertise, and loyalty to improving relations

between the two largest democracies in the world, the

United States and India: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors

2 the Indian American Friendship Council.

Æ
#### § 591.2 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to ensure that motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment permanently imported into the United States conform with theft prevention standards issued under part 541 of this chapter and that they conform with, or are brought into conformity with, all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards issued under part 571 of this chapter and bumper standards issued under part 581 of this chapter. The purpose of this part is also to ensure that nonconforming vehicles and equipment items imported on a temporary basis are ultimately either exported or abandoned to the United States.

[55 FR 11378, Mar. 28, 1990]