alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 119 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 17
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 119

                          [Report No. 107-50]

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 503) to amend title 18, 
United States Code, and the Uniform Code of Military Justice to protect 
    unborn children from assault and murder, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2001

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 503) to amend title 18, 
United States Code, and the Uniform Code of Military Justice to protect 
    unborn children from assault and murder, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 503) to amend title 18, 
United States Code, and the Uniform Code of Military Justice to protect 
unborn children from assault and murder, and for other purposes. The 
bill shall be considered as read for amendment. The amendment printed 
in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution 
shall be considered as adopted. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further 
amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: 
(1) two hours of debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on the Judiciary; (2) the further amendment printed in the 
Congressional Record pursuant to clause 8 of rule XVIII and numbered 1, 
if offered by Representative Lofgren of California or her designee, 
which shall be considered as read and shall be separately debatable for 
one hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an 
opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

                                                  House Calendar No. 17

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 119

                          [Report No. 107-50]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 503) to amend title 18, 
United States Code, and the Uniform Code of Military Justice to protect 
    unborn children from assault and murder, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 24, 2001

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
#### H. Wilson Lowe, Trading as Lowe Brothers, Plaintiff, v. Henry H. Hulliger, Trading as H. H. Hulliger, Defendant.

*332
      *(October*3, 1951.)

Layton, J., sitting.

*W. Howard Thompson*for Plaintiff.

*Everett F. Warrington*for Defendant.

Superior Court for Sussex County,

No. 91,

Civil Action, 1951.

*333Layton, J.:

The answer to plaintiff’s interrogatories was not under oath as required by Rule 33 of the *Rules of the Superior Court.*The purported answer to plaintiff’s request for admissions of facts was filed more than ten days after service of the request upon defendant. Both answers must be disregarded for failure to comply with the clear provisions of the Rules just cited. Thus, the following matters must be taken as admitted facts because of the failure to answer the request for admission within ten days:

1. That a lease was executed on a regular form of lease headed H. H. Hulliger, Bridgeville, Delaware, December 16, 1949, between Lowe Brothers, Lessor, and H. H. Hulliger, Lessee.

2. That the said lease was signed by Harry J. Truitt, Agent of H. H. Hulliger, Lessee.

3. That the said lease provided for rental of certain motor vehicles owned by the plaintiff and described as an International truck, license No. Md. 6-787, and a Fruehauf semi-trailer, license No. Md. T3-212.

4. That the said lease provided for payment to the plaintiff, *334Lowe Brothers, in the sum of Three Hundred Thirty-seven Dollars and Sixty-five Cents ($337.65).

5. That no part of the rent has been paid.

The purported defense set up in the answer to the request for admissions to the effect that Harry J. Truitt signed the lease, not as agent, but as principal, was a matter of avoidance which should have been pleaded as an affirmative defense in defendant’s answer, Rule 8(c)1. In any event, it is unavailing to defendant because it was asserted in the answer to plaintiff’s request for admission of facts filed too late.

In the light of the admissions of fact above recited and by which defendant is now bound, I have no alternative but to grant plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.

Let an order be submitted to that effect.

Rules 33 (Interrogatories) 36 (Requests for Admissions) and 8(c) (Affirmative Defenses) are either identical or practically identical with the Federal Rules bearing the same numbers.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 550 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 217
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 550

                          [Report No. 107-694]

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 111) 
  making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2003, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 2002

 Mr. Hastings of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 111) 
  making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2003, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 111) making continuing 
appropriations for the fiscal year 2003, and for other purposes. The 
joint resolution shall be considered as read for amendment. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the joint 
resolution to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate on the joint resolution equally divided and controlled 
by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit.

                                                 House Calendar No. 217

107th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 550

                          [Report No. 107-694]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 111) 
  making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2003, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 25, 2002

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
1210-AB32-2-1421.html[7/26/2015 4:56:40 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwb-q35k

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1917

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: John Collins

General Comment

my IRA is mature and I am 71....withdrawing each year. no help necessary from my government. Please do not

 include me in your new ideas.
#### § 601.27 Contents of written comments.

All written comments must be in English and submitted in five (5) legible copies, unless the number of copies is specified in the notice. Any interested person must submit as part of his/her written comments all material that he/she considers relevant to any statement of fact made by him/her. Incorporation of material by reference is to be avoided. However, if such incorporation is necessary, the incorporated material shall be identified with respect to document and page.
----

Action brought on 22 January 2004 by Mühlens GmbH & Co. KG against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

(Case T-28/04)

(2004/C 106/137)

Language of the case to be determined pursuant to Article 131(2) of the Rules of Procedure — language in which the application was submitted: German

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 22 January 2004 by Mühlens GmbH & Co. KG, Cologne (Germany), represented by T. Schulte-Beckhausen, lawyer. Mr Mirco Cara, Trezzano Sul Naviglio, Milan (Italy), was also a party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

----

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

----
§ 674.15 Designation of oversight agency for multi-state system. In an instance of a rail fixed guideway public transportation system that operates in more than one State, all States in which that rail fixed guideway public transportation system operates must either: ( a ) Ensure that uniform safety standards and procedures in compliance with 49 U.S.C. 5329 are applied to that rail fixed guideway public transportation system, through an SSO program that has been approved by the Administrator; or
( b ) Designate a single entity that meets the requirements for an SSOA to serve as the SSOA for that rail fixed guideway public transportation system, through an SSO program that has been approved by the Administrator.
# New Air Campaign Expands to the North

/ Published Feb. 6, 2018

**NEWS RELEASE**

2018-02-06****

**KABUL, Afghanistan (February 6, 2018)**– United States Forces-Afghanistan launched a series of precision strikes in Northern Afghanistan in a direct effort to destroy insurgent revenue sources, training facilities, and support networks.

Over the past 96 hours, U.S. forces conducted air operations to strike Taliban training facilities in Badakhshan province, preventing the planning and rehearsal of terrorist acts near the border with China and Tajikistan. The strikes also destroyed stolen Afghan National Army vehicles that were in the process of being converted to vehicle-borne improvised explosive devices.

During these strikes, a U.S. Air Force B-52 Stratofortress dropped 24 precision guided munitions on Taliban fighting positions, setting a record of the most guided munitions ever dropped from a B-52. The aircraft has played a leading role in Air Force operations for decades, and was recently reconfigured with a conventional rotary launcher to increase its reach and lethality.

Continued U.S. strikes disrupt Taliban support networks in Helmand province, as well as destroy their sources of revenue such as illegal narcotics.

Ongoing strikes in Helmand continue to degrade Taliban revenue sources and safe havens. U.S. strikes and ASSF raids have resulted in the removal of more than $30 million of Taliban revenue since the campaign began in November, 2017. 

"The Taliban have nowhere to hide," said General John Nicholson, commander, USFOR-A. "There will be no safe haven for any terrorist group bent on bringing harm and destruction to this country."

Over the past year, U.S. precision strikes and the efforts of the Afghan Air Force and Afghan Special Security Forces have prevented Taliban fighters from capturing Kunduz City. The Taliban continue to fail in their attempts to recapture lost territory in other areas. In 2017, the Taliban did not capture a single provincial capital, despite repeated boasts and attempts. Faced with failure on the battlefield, they have turned to targeting civilians as the only tactic they have left.

"The Taliban cannot win on the battlefield, therefore they inflict harm and suffering on innocent civilians," said Nicholson. "All they can do is kill innocent people and destroy what other people have built.”

-30-

**USFOR-APublicAffairsOffice**

Between 0830-2030 Afghanistan Local: Tel: +93 (0) 700 13-2114 / +93 (0) 700 13-2928

Between 2030-0830 Afghanistan Local: Tel: +93 (0) 700 13-4021

E-Mail:                                     pressoffice@hq.rs.nato.int

USFOR-A Facebook:              https://www.facebook.com/usforces.afghanistan/

USFOR-A Twitter:                   https://www.twitter.com/USFOR_A
§ 38.175 High-speed rail cars, monorails and systems. ( a ) All cars for high-speed rail systems, including but not limited to those using “maglev” or high speed steel-wheel-on-steel rail technology, and monorail systems operating primarily on dedicated rail (i.e., not used by freight trains) or guideway, in which stations are constructed in accordance with part 37, subpart C of this title, shall be designed for high-platform, level boarding and shall comply with § 38.111(a) of this part for each type of car which is similar to intercity rail, §§ 38.111(d), 38.113 (a) through (c) and (e), 38.115 (a) and (b), 38.117 (a) and (b), 38.121 through 38.123, 38.125(d), and 38.127 (if applicable) of this part. The design of cars shall be coordinated with the boarding platform design such that the horizontal gap between a car door at rest and the platform shall be no greater than 3 inches and the height of the car floor shall be within plus or minus 5 ⁄ 8 inch of the platform height under all normal passenger load conditions. Vertical alignment may be accomplished by car air suspension or other suitable means of meeting the requirement. All doorways shall have, when the door is open, at least 2 footcandles of illumination measured on the door threshold.
( b ) All other high-speed rail cars shall comply with the similar provisions of subpart F of this part.
# April 6 Red Sea Update

/ Published April 7, 2024

April 7, 2024Release Number 20240407 - 01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla. –**Between approximately 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. (Sanaa time) on April 6, U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) forces successfully destroyed one mobile surface-to air missile system in Houthi controlled territory of Yemen. CENTCOM forces also shot down one unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) over the Red Sea.

Additionally, at approximately 6:00 p.m. (Sanaa time), a Coalition vessel detected and successfully engaged and destroyed one inbound anti-ship missile.

There were no injuries or damage reported by U.S., coalition, or commercial ships. It was determined that these systems presented a threat to U.S. and coalition forces and merchant vessels in the region. CENTCOM is dedicated to protecting the freedom of navigation and making international waters safer and more secure for Coalition and merchant vessels.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JOSE LUIS LEDESMA, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D22-62

LT Case No. 2020-CF-000595-AOR

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/

Decision filed October 4, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Orange County, 

Elaine A. Barbour, Judge.

Jose L. Ledesma, Bristol, pro se.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, 

Daytona Beach and Steven N. 

Gosney, Assistant Public Defender,

Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Whitney Brown 

Hartless, Assistant Attorney General,

Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, NARDELLA and WOZNIAK, JJ., concur.
H. Res. 553

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 26, 2002.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4600) to improve patient access to health care services and provide improved

medical care by reducing the excessive burden the liability

system places on the health care delivery system. The bill

shall be considered as read for amendment. In lieu of the

amendments recommended by the Committees on the Judiciary and on Energy and Commerce now printed in the bill, the

amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the report

of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall

be considered as adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage

without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on

the bill, as amended, with 40 minutes equally divided and

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of

the Committee on the Judiciary and 20 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority
2

•HRES 553 EH

member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce; and (2)

one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### Lucius F. Reed, Respondent, v. A. G. Darwin, Appellant.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

itykman, J.
From: J MOE [mailto:moe_moe11@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 6:35 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 

To Whom it may concern 

I am responding to a proposal (RIN 1210-AB33)   being considered to convert 401k's

and IRA's into annuity‐like products. 

Let me be very clear, I am totally OPPOSED to any Mandatory conversion of ones assets

in part or total. 

I would prefer to see an option be made available for such an annuity‐like product  as a

CHOICE.

For those of us who have played by the rules, have made a conscious decision to forgo a

portion of our wages over time to save for the future and have been effectively

managing such, only to have it confiscated and or forced into an instrument that pays a

minimum return is not why I chose to save for my retirement. Since I manage my own

investments my returns are far greater than the Gov't could provide under such a

scenario. You're actions would result in significantly lowering my families standard of

living and indirectly even the Governments overall tax receipts, as well as a reduction in

consumption as I would not be able to maintain my current purchase levels. By

managing my own IRA account I have weathered this crisis very nicely. 

What is  also very sad about this proposal is that the perceived need is based on the

Governments desire to 'protect' retiree accounts from loss. Yet the fallacy of this idea is

that this crises was brought about entirely due to the Government and it's regulatory

agencies NOT protecting the individual investor/savers. The government failed to rein in

the fraud and excess of the Banks, the bubbles, fraudulent bookkeeping entities as well

as the creation of fraudulent and unregulated derivatives market, all well within the

current and existing laws already on the books.

We have a SEC that looks the other way when there is blatant market manipulation and

fraud. 

We have a Fed that claims they never saw it coming? 

We have a Government that manipulates the markets (the evidence is overwhelming) to

the benefit of the too big to fail. 

We have a FDIC that will not rein in the Banks risky practices 

We have A Freddie/Fannie that permits and condones risky housing loan practices. 

We have the repeal of laws that were implemented to prevent many of the causes of

today's crisis  Glass Steagle act 
We have the legalization of Fraudulent accounting practices Mark to model! 

We allow off shore bookkeeping and hiding of losses to paint a profitable book! 

We have massive risky assets being created and continue to be generated without any

'real' attempt to reign them in. CDS, Swaps, Derivatives etc. 

Fraudulent sale of the above instruments to pension funds, mutual funds etc 

I could go on but I think the pattern is clear. Bottom line none of these issues are being

addressed in any meaningful fashion nor is anyone being held accountable. Now your

going to FORCE me into tieing up my hard earned and saved assets into a low yielding

instrument to protect me!!!  NO THANK YOU. 

Sincerly 

Gerard Houle 

110 Hawkins Road 

Woodstock Valley, CT.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JULIO A. HERNANDEZ AND 

ROCIO MARTINEZ,

 Appellants,

v.

ENES M. KANLIC, M.D., EL PASO

COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT D/B/A

UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, 

AND TEXAS TECH HEALTH 

SCIENCES CENTER,

 Appellees. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00011-CV

Appeal from

448th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2016DCV3128)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee 

recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, see TEX.R.APP.P. 43.5, on the judgment and all 

costs, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 14TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2019.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, J., and Chew, C.J. (Senior Judge)

Chew, C.J. (Senior Judge), sitting by assignment
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 23, 2009 

l0615 

Order 

 

June 23, 2009 

138327 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138327 

 COA: 289797 

Jackson CC: 07-003548-FH 

SETH ELISHA BROWN, 07-003604-FH 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 11, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.