alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 672.21 Records. ( a ) *General requirement.* Each recipient shall ensure that its designated personnel are enrolled in the PTSCTP. Each recipient shall ensure that designated personnel update their individual training record as he or she completes the applicable training requirements of this part.
( b ) *SSOA requirement.* Each SSOA shall retain a record of the technical training completed by its designated personnel in accordance with the technical training requirements of Appendix A to this part. Such records shall be retained by the SSOA for at least five (5) years from the date the record is created.
Mattis takes command of CENTCOM Aug. 11
 By None  , U.S. Central Command
  MACDILL AFB, Fla. (Aug. 10, 2010) – Marine Gen. James N. Mattis is scheduled to assume command of U.S. Central Command from Acting Commander Lt. Gen. John R. Allen here at 6 p.m., Aug. 11 in a ceremony officiated by the Secretary of Defense, the Honorable Robert M. Gates, at the Lt. Cmdr. Otis Vincent Tolbert Joint Intelligence Operations Center. Mattis most recently commanded U.S. Joint Forces Command in Norfolk, Va. from 2007 to present.  From 2007 to 2009, he also concurrently served as NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander Transformation.  During Operation Enduring Freedom, he commanded the 1st Marine Expeditionary Brigade and Task Force 58 in Southern Afghanistan.  During Operation Iraqi Freedom, he commanded the 1st Marine Division.  Prior to his tenure at Joint Forces Command, he commanded the Marine Corps Combat Development Command, followed by the I Marine Expeditionary Force and the U.S. Marine Forces Central Command.
IV

House Calendar No. 143

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 390

[Report No. 107–412]

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 586)

to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the exclusion from gross income for foster care payments shall also apply to

payments by qualified placement agencies, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 17, 2002

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered

to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the

bill (H.R. 586) to amend the Internal Revenue Code

of 1986 to provide that the exclusion from gross income

for foster care payments shall also apply to payments

by qualified placement agencies, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill

3 (H.R. 586) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

4 to provide that the exclusion from gross income for foster
2

HRES 390 RH

1 care payments shall also apply to payments by qualified

2 placement agencies, and for other purposes, with the Sen3 ate amendment thereto, and to consider in the House

4 without intervention of any point of order a motion offered

5 by the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means

6 or his designee that the House concur in the Senate

7 amendment with the amendment printed in the report of

8 the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution.

9 The Senate amendment and the motion shall be consid10 ered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour

11 equally divided and controlled by the chairman and rank12 ing minority member of the Committee on Ways and

13 Means. The previous question shall be considered as or14 dered on the motion to final adoption without intervening

15 motion or demand for division of the question.

House Calendar No. 143

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 390

[Report No. 107–412]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 586) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the exclusion from gross income for foster care payments shall also apply to payments by qualified

placement agencies, and for other purposes.

APRIL 17, 2002

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
# Third District Court of Appeal Stat e of Florida Opinion filed Ma y 22, 2024. Not final unti l dispositi on of timely filed mot ion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D23-2219 Lower Tribunal No. 91 -13989 SP

________________ 

### Florida Recovery Solutions, Inc., etc. ,

Appellant,

vs. 

### First Union National Bank of Florida, et al.,

Appellee s

.
An Appeal from a non-final order from the County Court fo r MiamiDade County, Myriam Lehr, Judge. Allison Law Group and Ann M. Allison (Temple Terrace) , for appellant. Friedman & Greenberg , P.A., and Debra L. Greenberg ( Plantation) , for appellee Westport Recovery Corporation

.
Before LOGUE, C.J., and LINDSEY and BOKOR , JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
-----Original Message----- 

From: Dr. John Walters [mailto:waltersj@alpenacc.edu] 

Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 11:32 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: 401k Annuities 

I am a low-income part-time wage earner with a small 401k (30k)and a 

small IRA (86K), which had been a 403b (prior to my dismissal when the 

school where I taught developed financial problems in 2000). Two years 

ago the IRA was double the size it is presently, though the 401k 

annuity with TIAA has barely grown over the last ten years. I thought 

about the possibility of putting the IRA into an annuity with TIAA or 

another insurance company, and perhaps there are companies out there 

like Prudential who would be able and willing to do that for me at my 

present age of 57. I did not do so because in my experience insurance 

companies charge inordinate fees for their investment products and 

reserve the lion's share of the investment gains for themselves rather 

than passing them through to their clients. I opted instead to do a 

SEPP or 72T Distribution after rolling my 401K into an IRA. I took the 

SEPP because I was out of work and had medical bills to cover (no 

insurance). In this instance, I kept control over my investment 

choices (uniformly bad though they were)and kept the fees on the 

account to a minimum. I am locked into monthly distributions which are 

now much too large for the remaining fund balance, but I cannot change 

them according to IRS regulations. So, it will not carry me very far 

into retirement. The government's regulations on IRAs, 401Ks, and 403Bs 

does not do very much to steer small investors safely through the 

minefields of economic preparation for the vicissitudes of forced early 

retirements and permanent lay-offs hitting older workers. I really 

think that Social Security needs to be revamped to permit early buy-in 

with proceeds taken from these self-administered retirement accounts. I 

would have jumped at that possibility so long as it included some sort 

of Medicare buy-in as well. I hope this helps you in your deliberations 

about 401K plan annuities as a possibility. Remember, the insurance 

industry is slobbering at the mouth to get their hands on all the baby 

boomer accounts and the securities industry is foaming at the mouth to 

keep the accounts where they are, much to their own profit. Here in noman's-land between the two cannibalistic sharks a not-for-profit 

government program focused on those falling through the economic floor 

could be a very wonderful godsend. 

John R. Walters 

1131 Emerson Road 

Herron, MI 49744
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBC) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I Tony J. Sorcic, President & Chief Executive Officer
of PNBC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of PNBC.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|/s/ Tony J. Sorcic                               
|-------------------------------------------------
|Tony J. SorcicPresident & Chief
Executive Officer

May 10, 2005

22

---
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Project No. 5596-020]
 On April 30, 2021, the Town of Bedford, Virginia filed an application for a new major license for the 5.0-megawatt Bedford Hydroelectric Project (Bedford Project or project; FERC No. 5596). The Bedford Project is located on the James River, near the Town of Bedford, in Bedford and Amherst counties, Virginia. In accordance with the Commission's regulations, on May 31, 2023, Commission staff issued a notice that the project was ready for environmental analysis (REA notice). Based on the information in the record, including comments filed on the REA notice, staff does not anticipate that licensing the project would constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Therefore, staff intends to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) on the application to license the Bedford Project. The EA will be issued and circulated for review by all interested parties. All comments filed on the EA will be analyzed by staff and considered in the Commission's final licensing decision. The application will be processed according to the following schedule. Revisions to the schedule may be made as appropriate. Milestone
Target dateCommission issues EA
January 2024.1Comments on EA
February 2024.
 Any questions regarding this notice may be directed to Andy Bernick at (202) 502-8660 or 
                    *andrew.bernick@ferc.gov.* Dated: August 17, 2023. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary.


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         The Council on Environmental Quality's (CEQ) regulations under 40 CFR 1501.10(b)(1) (2022) require that EAs be completed within 1 year of the federal action agency's decision to prepare an EA. 
                        *See*
                         National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. 4321 
                        *et seq., as amended by*
                         section 107(g)(1)(B)(iii) of the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023, Public Law 118-5, section 4336a, 137 Stat. 42. Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2023-18127 Filed 8-22-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 612 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                      November 15 (legislative day, November 14), 2002.
Whereas Dr. Cruz received a bachelor's degree in Spanish from the Wichita State 
        University, a masters degree in education from the University of 
        California-Berkeley, and a doctoral degree in policy, planning, and 
        administration from the University of California-Berkeley;
Whereas Dr. Cruz was appointed by the Secretary of Education to a national 
        advisory council that dealt with the education of language minority 
        students;
Whereas Dr. Cruz has received many honors from educational and Hispanic 
        organizations for his support of education for limited English 
        proficient children, including introduction into the Hispanic Hall of 
        Fame and the Hispanic Achievement Award in Education;
Whereas Dr. Cruz had the foresight and courage to address the lack of 
        educational opportunities for young Hispanic students coming out of high 
        school by founding the National Hispanic University in Oakland, 
        California, in 1981, and serving as its first President;
Whereas Dr. Cruz developed strong partnerships between the academic and business 
        communities to foster educational opportunities; and
Whereas on September 4, 2002, Dr. Cruz died after a long and distinguished 
        career: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes Dr. Roberto Cruz's professionalism and commitment to 
        education;
            (2) honors Dr. Cruz's life; and
            (3) extends its condolences to the Cruz family and to the faculty, 
        staff, and students of the National Hispanic University on the occasion 
        of his death.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
----

**EXHIBIT      32.3**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                March 14, 2006 | By:    | /s/Jeffry                E. Sterba     |
|-------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                                |   | Jeffry                E. Sterba        |
|                                |   | Chairman,                President and |
|                                |   | Chief                Executive Officer |
From: (Phyllis) Jean Boucher [mailto:pjb336@msn.com] 

Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 7:18 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Lifetime income

Greetings:

 

Today in the Seattle Times I read an article about a proposal for annuities to become a rollover 

option in 401k plans. I have had 2 annuities since 2004 providing a supplemental income to my 

social security, and have been able to survive quite nicely. I think it's a great idea, and wish it 

had been available through work from which I retired in 1994. Wonderful idea! 

 

 

Jean Boucher 

7100 Greenwood Ave N #209 

Seattle WA 98103 

206-362-4230 

cell: 206-612-4711 

pjb336@msn.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CML GROUP, INC. FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
JULY 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                       4,359,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,857,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,706,000
<INVENTORY>                                 33,922,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            58,814,000
<PP&E>                                      94,681,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              46,223,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             146,336,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       49,119,000
<BONDS>                                     41,593,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,274,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  40,454,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               146,336,000
<SALES>                                    341,315,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           341,315,000
<CGS>                                      164,081,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              164,081,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,553,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,797,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (60,931,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                              (20,717,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (40,214,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (40,214,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.81)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.81)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 630.7 Failure to respond to questions.

FTA will review each NTD submission to verify the reasonableness of the data submitted. If any of the data do not appear reasonable, FTA will notify the reporting entity of this fact in writing, and request written justification from the reporting entity to either document the accuracy of the questioned data, or to revise the questioned data with a more accurate submission. Failure of a reporting entity to make a good-faith written response to this request will be treated as a failure to report data under § 630.5.
<Page>

EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Computer
Horizons Corp. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Annual
Report"), I, William J. Murphy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that
the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.


Date: December 30, 2003                              /s/  William J. Murphy
                                                     ----------------------
                                                     WILLIAM J. MURPHY
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 466 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 466

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that reciting the 
 Pledge of Allegiance in schools is constitutional, that the Congress 
deplores the decision of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and that the 
 House of Representatives encourages every American to start their day 
                        by reciting the Pledge.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 26, 2002

    Mr. Israel (for himself and Mr. Shows) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that reciting the 
 Pledge of Allegiance in schools is constitutional, that the Congress 
deplores the decision of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and that the 
 House of Representatives encourages every American to start their day 
                        by reciting the Pledge.

Whereas the original Pledge of Allegiance was written by Francis Bellamy in 
        1892;
Whereas the Congress of the United States officially endorsed the Pledge of 
        Allegiance in 1942;
Whereas in 1954 Congress officially added the words ``Under God'' to the Pledge;
Whereas the Supreme Court ruled in 1943 that schoolchildren could not be forced 
        to recite the pledge;
Whereas the House of Representatives begins each of its days by reciting the 
        Pledge of Allegiance;
Whereas millions of Americans have been reciting the current Pledge without 
        significant controversy for 48 years;
Whereas the 9th United States Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the Pledge of 
        Allegiance unconstitutional on June 26, 2002;
Whereas the United States is currently engaged in military combat in the War on 
        Terrorism;
Whereas the decision of the 9th United States Circuit Court of Appeals could 
        provide aid and comfort to enemies of the United States of America; and
Whereas our nation is one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and 
        justice for all: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives, That it is the sense of 
the House of Representatives that--
            (1) reciting the Pledge of Allegiance in schools and other 
        public places is constitutional;
            (2) the decision of the 9th United States Circuit Court of 
        Appeals is wrong, erroneous, deplorable, and should be 
        overturned by the United States Supreme Court; and
            (3) Americans of every age should be encouraged to begin 
        their day by reciting the following Pledge: I pledge allegiance 
        to the Flag of the United States of America and to the Republic 
        for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with 
        liberty and justice for all.
                                 <all>
```