alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 164 (Friday, August 25, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 58258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18425]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice; Withdrawal

AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Sunshine Act notice; notice of public agenda, withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action withdraws the Sunshine Act Notice published in the 
Federal Register on August 21, 2023, Public Meeting: U.S. Election 
Assistance Commission.

DATES: As of August 22, 2023, the Sunshine Act Notice published in the 
Federal Register on August 21, 2023 (88 FR 56811) is withdrawn.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristen Muthig, Telephone: (202) 897-
9285, Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8ee5e3fbfae6e7e9ceebefeda0e9e1f8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="563d3b23223e3f311633373578313920">[email protected]</span></a>.

Camden Kelliher,
Senior Associate Counsel, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-18425 Filed 8-23-23; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-71-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

VIRNETX INC., 

Appellant

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., 

Appellee

______________________

2019-1725

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,792.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. 

P. 42 (b).

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

August 10, 2023

Date /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

Jarrett B. Perlow 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: August 10, 2023

Case: 19-1725 Document: 46 Page: 1 Filed: 08/10/2023
#### § 595.2 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to provide an exemption from the “make inoperative” provision of 49 U.S.C. 30122 that permits motor vehicle dealers and motor vehicle repair businesses to install retrofit air bag on-off switches and to otherwise modify motor vehicles to enable people with disabilities to operate or ride as a passenger in a motor vehicle.

[66 FR 12655, Feb. 27, 2001]
#### Mary Flannery, *Appellant, v.*Henry James and another, *Respond*ents.—

Motion for reargument granted, unless defendants stipulate within five days to modify the order appealed from by striking out the provision requiring plaintiff and her husband to vacate the premises and surrender possession thereof, in which case the motion for argument is denied, without costs to either party, and the plaintiff is to have twenty days from the tendering of such stipulation to comply with the terms of said order as so modified.
#### § 390.1 Purpose.

This part establishes general applicability, definitions, general requirements and information as they pertain to persons subject to this chapter.
Strafford,

Dec., 1895.

#### Gale *v.*Dover.

A town is liable, under Laws 1893, c. 59, *s.*1, for damages happening by rea* son of the defective condition of a sewer covering located in a highway.

Case, for damages to the plaintiff’s horse from a defective highway. Trial by jury and verdict for the plaintiff If the defect from which the damage arose is one for which the defendants are liable, the plaintiff is entitled to judgment; otherwise, there is to be judgment for the defendants.

*W. S. $ D. R. Pierce,*for the plaintiff

*William F. Nason,*for the defendants.

Parsons, J.

The plaintiff’s horse stepped upon the covering of an opening in the highway designed to admit the surface water into the sewer beneath the street, and because of a defect in such covering was injured, as the plaintiff claimed. The only question reserved is whether the defect in the covering of the opening into the sewer is a defect for which the city is liable under *c.*59, *s.*1, Laws 1893. By that statute towns are made liable “ for damages happening to any person, his team or carriage, traveling upon a bridge, culvert, or sluiceway, . . . upon any highway, by reason of any obstruction, defect, insufficiency, or want of repair of such bridge, culvert, or sluiceway,” which renders the highway unsuitable for the travel thereon. There is no distinction material in this case between a sewer and a culvert. A sewer is a drain or passage to carry off water or filth underground, a subterraneous channel through which water runs off. Webster Inter. Diet., *ed.*1894. A culvert, as used in the statute, is a covered drain under a road designed for the passage of water. *Boyd*v. *Derry, ante, p.*272. The hole into which the plaintiff’s horse thrust his foot was over such a drain, and the injury was caused by the defective covering of a portion of the underground passage designed to carry off the surface water of *404the street. Such a defect is within the statute, and according to the reserved case there' should be judgment for the plaintiff.

*Case discharged.*

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
# Griffin Missile Exercise 2019

/ Published Dec. 19, 2019

ARABIAN GULF (Dec. 14, 2019) – U.S. Navy coastal patrol ships and U.S. Coast Guard patrol boats conducted an annual test of the MK-60 Griffin guided-missile system in the Arabian Gulf Dec. 10-14.

The annual exercise was conducted with the improved Griffin Missile System (GMS) to test ship interoperability, weapon tactics employment, and new system upgrades.

"This system improves combat capability on our 10 Patrol Craft, ready to work with regional partners and respond to threats; able to maneuver and strike from a distance,” said Vice Adm. Jim Malloy, Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command/Commander, U.S 5th Fleet.

Exercise participates included Forward Deployed Naval Forces (FDNF) patrol coastal ships USS Sirocco (PC 6), USS Tempest (PC 2), USS Squall (PC 7), USS Hurricane (PC 3), USS Whirlwind (PC 11) and island class patrol boats USCGC Adak (WPB-1333), USCGC Aquidneck (WPB-1309), and USCGC Baranof (WPB-1318).

The ships also conducted live fire exercises with their Mark 38 25mm machine guns and other crew served weapons to maintain operator proficiency and test new equipment upgrades for future missions.

“The data collected from this year’s exercise will help improve the GMS to provide increased lethality amongst our FDNF ships,” Lt. Cmdr. Ronald Jenkins, commanding officer of the Sirocco. “Each participating ship can apply lessons learned to sharpen individual tactics and procedures to increase precision in weapons employment.”

Eager to integrate and demonstrate the upgraded GMS into their ships’ systems, each captain was impressed with its capabilities and the crew’s performance during the exercise.

“This year’s Fire Exercise (FIREX) was an outstanding opportunity for the crews to test our skills and the capabilities of one of our primary weapons systems,” said Lt. Cmdr. Dale Tourtelotte of the Hurricane. “It was exciting to see my crew and the various technical experts come together and execute the FIREX successfully.”

U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations encompasses about 2.5 million square miles of water area and includes the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, Red Sea and parts of the Indian Ocean. The expanse is comprised of 20 countries and includes three critical choke points at the Strait of Hormuz, the Suez Canal and the Strait of Bab al Mandeb at the southern tip of Yemen.

“This exercise addresses a validated requirement to out-pace and decisively defeat small boat threats at a distance," said Vice Adm. Malloy. “We can hold any attacker at risk by employing speed combined with accurate striking power,” said Vice Adm. Malloy.

For more news from Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command/5th Fleet, visit www.cusnc.navy.mil/
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Quality Systems, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2008 (the Report), the
undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: 1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.  Dated: February 5, 2009

By:
/s/ STEVEN PLOCHOCKISteven PlochockiChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)Dated: February 5, 2009

By:
/s/ PAUL HOLTPaul HoltChief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) A
signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request. 50
EXHIBIT 21

                               AMBASE CORPORATION
                               SUBSIDIARY LISTING
                             AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                     Jurisdiction                   Percentage Voting
                                                     In Which                       Securities Owned By
Name                                                 Organized                      Immediate Parent
==================================================== ============================== ================================
<S>                                                  <C>                            <C>
AmBase Corporation                                   Delaware                       N/A

     Carteret Bancorp, Inc.                          Delaware                       100%

     Home Capital Services, Inc.                     Delaware                       100%

     Maiden Lane Associates, Ltd.                    Delaware                       100%

     SDG Financial Corp.                             Delaware                       100%
</TABLE>

Note:    Interrelationships shown by indentation with 100% ownership unless
         otherwise indicated.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23-B


                                            January 22, 2001



RE: EVALUATION OF THE P&NG RESERVES OF COLUMBIA NATURAL RESOURCES (AS OF
    DECEMBER 31, 2000) CONSTANT PRICE AND COST VERSION FOR U.S. SECURITIES
    REPORTING REQUIREMENTS


As independent petroleum and natural gas consultants, we hereby consent to the
filing of this Letter Report in its entirety as an Exhibit to the 2000 Annual
Report of Columbia Energy Group to the Securities and Exchange Commission on
Form 10-K, and any Registration Statement of Columbia Energy Group, relating to
the issue of securities to the public during 2001; to the quotation or
summarization of portions of this Letter Report, subject to our approval of the
related page(s) of the document(s), in the 10-K, the Prospectus included in said
Registration Statement(s) or the 2000 Annual Report to Stockholders; and,
subject to approval of the related page(s) of the document(s), to the use of our
name and the reliance upon our authority as experts in said Annual Report to
Stockholders, Form 10-K and Prospectus(es) and in Part II of said Registration
Statement(s). We have no interest of a substantial or material nature in
Columbia Energy Group, or in any affiliate, nor are we to receive any such
interest as payment for the preparation of this Letter Report; we have not been
employed for such preparation on a contingent fee basis; and we are not
connected with Columbia Energy Group or any affiliate as a promoter,
underwriter, voting trustee, director, officer, employee, or affiliate.



                                                  /s/ Peter C. Sidey
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Peter C. Sidey, P.Eng.
                                                Senior Reservoir Engineer


                                                   /s/ H.J. Helwerda
                                                --------------------------------
                                                H. J. Helwerda, P.Eng.
                                                Vice-President, Engineering
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 385 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 23, 2002.
Whereas the United States Customs Service offices located in 6 World Trade 
        Center were destroyed on September 11, 2001, as a result of terrorist 
        attacks;
Whereas the men and women of the United States Customs Service in 6 World Trade 
        Center selflessly, and at great risk, ensured no one was left behind in 
        the imperiled building and continued to extricate coworkers until all 
        760 Customs employees were safe and accounted for;
Whereas the men and women of the United States Customs Service in 6 World Trade 
        Center selflessly, and at great risk, ensured the safety of others while 
        assisting national, State, and local officials in continued rescue and 
        recovery efforts;
Whereas the United States Customs Service established a temporary operations 
        center at JFK Airport just hours after the attack and worked tirelessly 
        to permanently relocate the New York Customs office only 3 weeks later;
Whereas the dedicated men and women of the United States Customs Service 
        continue to sift through the debris at 6 World Trade Center to retrieve 
        vital evidence, which has since aided in recent criminal convictions; 
        and
Whereas the United States Customs Service, with increased resolve, continues its 
        vigil to safeguard our borders and serve on the frontline in our 
        Nation's war against terrorism, and the men and women of the United 
        States Customs Service represent a dedication to duty in the highest 
        traditions of the Department of the Treasury and the United States of 
        America: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors the continued dedication of the men and women assigned to 
        the United States Custom Service, New York operations;
            (2) recognizes the critical importance of the United States Customs 
        Service on the frontline of our national security efforts; and
            (3) supports providing the necessary resources to ensure the full 
        operation of the United States Customs Service, New York operations, and 
        that of Customs nationwide.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.31 Who may collect specimens for DOT drug testing? ( a ) Collectors meeting the requirements of this subpart are the only persons authorized to collect urine specimens for DOT drug testing.
( b ) A urine collector must meet training requirements of § 40.33.
( c ) An oral fluid collector must meet the training requirements of § 40.35.
( d ) To avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest, if you are the immediate supervisor of the employee being tested, you must not act as the collector when that employee is tested, unless no other collector is available and you are permitted to do so under DOT agency drug and alcohol regulations.
( e ) You must not act as the collector for the employee being tested if you work for a HHS-certified laboratory (*e.g.,* as a technician or accessioner) and could link the employee with a urine specimen, drug testing result, or laboratory report.
( f ) Employees are not permitted to be their own collector. ( 1 ) An employee who is a qualified collector is not permitted to be their own collector; another qualified collector must perform the collection in accordance with this part.
( 2 ) To avoid a potential conflict of interest, a collector must not be related to the employee being tested (*e.g.,* spouse, ex-spouse, relative) or a close personal friend.
[65 FR 79526, Dec. 19, 2000, as amended at 88 FR 27637, May 2, 2023]
# July 24: Military airstrikes continue against ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published July 24, 2016

July 24, 2016Release # 20160724-01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**SOUTHWEST ASIA —**On July 23, coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq. In Syria, coalition military forces conducted nine strikes using bomber, attack, fighter, and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL targets. Additionally in Iraq, coalition military forces conducted four strikes coordinated with and in support of the Government of Iraq using fighter aircraft against ISIL targets.The following is a summary of the strikes conducted against ISIL since the last press release:**Syria*** Near Ar Raqqah, one strike struck an ISIL improvised explosive device factory.* Near Manbij, eight strikes struck seven separate ISIL tactical units and destroyed nine ISIL fighting positions and an ISIL command and control node.**Iraq*** Near Habbaniyah, one strike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL fighting position.* Near Qayyarah, one strike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed two ISIL mortar systems, 12 ISIL rockets, 19 ISIL rocket rails, seven ISIL oil tankers, and an ISIL assembly area and denied ISIL access to terrain.* Near Ramadi, one strike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL fighting position, an ISIL vehicle, and an ISIL weapons cache.* Near Sultan Abdallah, one strike destroyed an ISIL weapons storage facility.Strike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely.A strike, as defined in the CJTF releases, means one or more kinetic events that occur in roughly the same geographic location to produce a single, sometimes cumulative effect for that location. So having a single aircraft deliver a single weapon against a lone ISIL vehicle is one strike, but so is multiple aircraft delivering dozens of weapons against a group of buildings and vehicles and weapon systems in a compound, for example, having the cumulative effect of making that facility (or facilities) harder or impossible to use. Accordingly, CJTF-OIR does not report the number or type of aircraft employed in a strike, the number of munitions dropped in each strike, or the number of individual munition impact points against a target.Ground-based artillery fired in counter-fire or in fire support to maneuver roles are not classified as a strike as defined by CJTF-OIR.The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria, and the wider international community.The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have conducted strikes in Iraq include Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Coalition nations which have conducted strikes in Syria include Australia, Bahrain, Canada, France, Jordan, the Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DON M. KUBANYI,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

JAKE COVEY; PATRICK NELSON,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-35340

D.C. No. 4:04-cv-00026-RRB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Alaska

Ralph R. Beistline, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 30, 2010** 

Anchorage, Alaska

Before: SCHROEDER, O’SCANNLAIN and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Don Kubanyi was arrested by Alaskan state troopers Jake Covey and Patrick

Nelson for disorderly behavior in response to an alleged trespass on his land. 

Kubanyi filed suit against Covey and Nelson under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeking

FILED

AUG 04 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

damages and fees. The district court granted Covey and Nelson’s motion for

summary judgment on qualified immunity. Kubanyi filed a motion for

reconsideration, but it was denied. Kubanyi timely appeals, arguing that Covey

and Nelson violated his First Amendment right to free speech, his Fourth

Amendment right against false arrest, and his Fourteenth Amendment right against

deprivation of property without due process. 

I

Kubanyi’s First and Fourth Amendment claims are not properly preserved

on appeal because he did not raise them until his motion for reconsideration in the

district court. See Self-Realization Fellowship Church v. Ananda Church of SelfRealization, 59 F.3d 902, 912 (9th Cir. 1995). In any event, Kubanyi’s First

Amendment right to free speech was not violated because the officers arrested him

in order to assure the safety of the situation in light of Kubanyi’s disorderly

conduct, not in retaliation for his speech. See Dietrich v. John Ascuaga’s Nugget,

548 F.3d 892, 896, 900-02 (9th Cir. 2008). In addition, Kubanyi cannot prevail on

his Fourth Amendment false arrest claim because he was convicted of the offense

for which the officers arrested him. See Cabrera v. City of Huntington Park, 159

F.3d 374, 380 (9th Cir. 1998) (per curiam). 

II
3

In contrast to his First and Fourth Amendment claims, Kubanyi’s Fourteenth

Amendment claim is properly preserved for appeal. However, Kubanyi’s

Fourteenth Amendment right against deprivation of property without due process

was not violated because Covey and Nelson did not deprive Kubanyi of any of his

legal rights with respect to his property. See Meyers v. Redwood City, 400 F.3d

765, 767-68 (9th Cir. 2005).

III

For these reasons, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
-----Original Message----- 

From: Christopher Baker [mailto:cbaker@brandslinger.com] 

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 2:33 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33. NO! 

Dear sir/madam, 

Do not in ANY WAY take money from my retirement fund and force it into 

an annuity of your choosing. This would be outright government theft 

and would mark the true convergence of our country with the likes of 

such well run Kleptocracies as Argentina. It would only benefit you 

spendthrift political hacks and the current crop of Banksters who have 

co-opted our government. 

Any elected official who works to make this possible will be thrown out 

of office by me and the millions of citizens whose savings are 

threatened by this proposal. The new crop of elected officials will 

then fire you bureaucrats in the treasury who helped make this 

possible. 

So STOP. Go no further. 

Chris Baker