alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 541 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 541

  Recognizing the Reserve Forces Policy Board on its 50th anniversary.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 19, 2002

Mr. Reyes submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing the Reserve Forces Policy Board on its 50th anniversary.

Whereas the Reserve Forces Policy Board represents members of the Guard and 
        Reserve as their advocate to the Secretary of Defense and Congress;
Whereas the Reserve Forces Policy Board must continue to provide to the civilian 
        and military leadership of the Department of Defense timely and 
        independent advice on matters pertaining to the Reserve components of 
        the Armed Forces; and
Whereas during the Persian Gulf War and again in the aftermath of the September 
        11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the Nation's reliance upon the Reserve 
        components has become increasingly clear: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives commends the Reserve 
Forces Policy Board, created by the Armed Forces Reserve Act of 1952 
(Public Law 82-476), on its 50th anniversary and for its fine work as 
an independent source of advice to the Secretary of Defense on all 
matters pertaining to the Reserve components of the Armed Forces.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 378 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 11, 2002.
    Resolved, That at a time designated by the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, official photographs of the House may be taken while the House 
is in actual session. Payment for the costs associated with taking, preparing, 
and distributing such photographs may be made from the applicable accounts of 
the House of Representatives.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### Pearl Eisele et al., appellees, v. L. A. Meeker et al., appellants.

Filed February 23, 1921.

No. 21251.

Appeal. In the absence of a bill of exceptions, when the sufficiency of tbe pleadings is not questioned, tbe judgment of tbe trial court will be affirmed.

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: William A. Redick, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*Charles W. Haller,*for appellants.

*R. J. Hadden*and *W. W. Hoye, contra.*

Morrissey, C. J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to recover for damages to plaintiffs’ automobile caused by the negligent driving of a team and wagon owned by defendant Meeker. A jury was waived and the cause submitted to the court on a stipulation of facts. The court entered judgment in favor of plaintiffs and against defendant Harney Street Stables, a partnership, and defendants Meeker and Davis, and dismissed the cause of action against defendants Jackson. Defendants Harney Street Stables and Meeker have ap-. pealed.

A purported stipulation of facts is set out in appellants’ brief, but is not incorporated in a bill of exceptions, and, no such bill has been filed. The sufficiency of the pleadings is not questioned, and it follows that the judgment must be affirmed. A consideration of the stipulation set out in the brief would not, however, result in a 'reversal.,

Affirmed.
§ 553.17 Participation of interested persons. ( a ) Any interested person may participate in rulemaking proceeding by submitting comments in writing containing information, views or arguments.
( b ) In his discretion, the Administrator may invite any interested person to participate in the rulemaking procedures described in § 553.25.
Exhibit 11.1

                        ZMAX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

              CALCULATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE
                                  (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               For the three months ended March 31,
                                                               ------------------------------------
                                                                      1998             1997
                                                               ------------------------------------
<S>                                                             <C>               <C>
Net loss                                                        $   (681,731)     $ (2,144,327)
                                                                =============     =============
Weighted average share calculations
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding:
Average number of shares of common stock
  outstanding during the quarter                                  11,729,714         6,704,072
Less: Average number of restricted shares of
  common stock outstanding during the quarter                      2,800,000         2,800,000
Less: Average number of cancellable shares of
  common stock outstanding during the quarter                        479,801           479,801
                                                                -------------     -------------
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding:             8,449,913         3,424,271
                                                                =============     =============
Basic and diluted net loss per share                            $      (0.08)     $      (0.63)
                                                                =============     =============
</TABLE>
304(m) CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE OW-200 8 -0 517 DCN 10030 THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
<PAGE>

                       [LETTERHEAD OF EISNER & LUBIN LLP]

                         Independent Auditors' Consent
                         -----------------------------


            We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
November 13, 1996, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Concord
Fabrics Inc. for the fiscal year ended August 31, 1997, into the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of Concord Fabrics Inc., which became effective on
February 18, 1994.

                                        /s/  EISNER & LUBIN LLP.
                                        ----------------------------
                                        CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


New York, New York
December 22, 1997









<PAGE>
Docket: EBSA-2008-0011 

Investment Advice—Participants and Beneficiaries 

Comment On: EBSA-2008-0011-0054 

Investment Advice - Participants and Beneficiaries 

Document: EBSA-2008-0011-DRAFT-0073 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: Oren Peretz 

Address: 

PO Box 17600 

Encino, CA, 91416-7600 

Email: operetz@1stallied.com 

Organization: First Allied Securities, Inc. 

General Comment 

My comments are presented to expose a critical flaw in this rule as it pertains to its ramification and 

potential conflict with the current SEC move to address the current 12B-1 fee structure in the mutual 

fund industry. I am bringing up this conflict which will surely occur when and if the SEC revises or 

eliminates the 12B-1 program currently under review. Under the broker/dealer structure, a registered 

representative receiving the trailing fees (normally ranging between 25-100 basis points) under the 12B1 program as the method of receiving the "level" compensation discussed in this rule would be reduced 

or eliminated thereby causing an alternative sturcture (most likely some sort of fee "wrap") be placed on 

the account which would cause INCREASED cost and fees to the exact individuals and plans this DOL 

rule is trying to control. This is an overlooked, but typical problem, whereby two different agencys (e.g 

DOL and the SEC) are working to try to solve a problem but have no idea or concept of how interrelated 

their efforts need to be. No where is this being addressed and hopefully this public comment will attract 

the attention necessary to cause a full investigation of the conflicts which will occur thereby resulting in 

HIGHER costs and fess then this rule is trying to prevent. More importantly, the DOL's rule and effect on 

the IRA's accounts, affecting potentially millions of accounts, is not properly analyzed as it relates to the 

upcoming SEC's decision on 12B-1s under the broker/dealer (non RIA) direct business or clearing house 

holdings. Unfortunately, the public remarks section of this submission does not allow the full discussion 

and analysis of this problem, so hopefully someone will investigate this BEFORE any final rule is 

implemented. Based on this, I believe the implementation of this rule should be delayed until such time 

a thorugh and complete analysis is done with the SEC. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: April 19, 2010 

Received: April 15, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80ad8295 

Comments Due: May 05, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=Print&PrintId=0900006480ad82... 4/19/2010
From: Metaqubit@aol.com [mailto:Metaqubit@aol.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 12:52 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

To you bureaucrats - Concerning your proposal to confiscate our retirement money in exchange 

for a federal annuity....GET OUT! Get out of our lives!!! We have had it with more hare brained 

federal scheming to steal our money, steal our rights, attempt to control more of our lives. Your 

phoney arguments are rejected, period. 

 

It should not be hard to understand that American citizens reject what you are trying to do. Drop 

it, push yourself away from the desk and go find more productive things to do. 

 

Cort Wrotnowski 

20 Zygmont La. 

Greenwich, CT 06831
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 54 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     February 28, 2001.
Whereas February is Black History Month, a month-long celebration for Americans 
        to reflect on both the history and teachings of African Americans whose 
        contributions are still too little known;
Whereas Black History Month was started in 1976 and February was chosen because 
        the birthdays of both Frederick Douglass and Abraham Lincoln fall in 
        that month;
Whereas African Americans were an integral part of settling the West, arriving 
        in covered wagons, establishing self-sufficient settlements, and filling 
        numerous jobs from barber to teacher, doctor to State legislator;
Whereas nearly one-third of the cowboys who helped build the American West were 
        of African American descent;
Whereas one of the best examples of an African American prairie settlement is 
        Dearfield, Colorado, an African American agriculture community;
Whereas Oliver T. Jackson, an African American, inspired by Booker T. 
        Washington's book Up From Slavery that urged African Americans to return 
        to the land and earn their own way with their own hands, took these 
        ideas to heart and established Dearfield, Colorado, in 1910;
Whereas Oliver T. Jackson inspired 60 African American settlers to join in his 
        agriculture colony, live off the land, and become self-sufficient;
Whereas within 5 years, Dearfield, Colorado, had 44 wooden cabins, over 600 farm 
        acres, 2 churches, a school, a boarding house, a blacksmith shop, a 
        doctor's office, a cement factory, and a filling station;
Whereas Oliver T. Jackson and those at Dearfield, Colorado, reached their goal 
        of becoming a prosperous, self-sufficient community, with a peak 
        population of 700;
Whereas by the mid-1930's, plagued by drought and the Great Depression, the 
        community dwindled down to 12, including Oliver T. Jackson and his wife; 
        and
Whereas Dearfield, Colorado, was subsequently abandoned and is now in need of 
        restoration in order to help fulfill the goal of Black History Month and 
        educate Americans about the role of African Americans in the settling of 
        the American West: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) encourages all Americans to learn about the history of African 
        Americans whose contributions are still too little known;
            (2) recognizes the role that African Americans, like those at 
        Dearfield, Colorado, greatly contributed to settling and shaping the 
        American West; and
            (3) supports the restoration of the site at Dearfield, Colorado, in 
        order to educate the American public about the history and contributions 
        of African Americans to the West and the United States.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
§ 382.719 Availability and removal of information. ( a ) *Driver information not available.* Information about a driver's drug or alcohol violation will not be available to an employer conducting a query of the Clearinghouse after all of the following conditions relating to the violation are satisfied: ( 1 ) The SAP reports to the Clearinghouse the information required in § 382.705(d);
( 2 ) The employer reports to the Clearinghouse that the driver's return-to-duty test results are negative;
( 3 ) The driver's current employer reports that the driver has successfully completed all follow-up tests as prescribed in the SAP report in accordance with §§ 40.307, 40.309, and 40.311 of this title; and
( 4 ) Five years have passed since the date of the violation determination.
( b ) *Driver information remains available.* Information about a particular driver's drug or alcohol violation will remain available to employers conducting a query until all requirements in paragraph (a) of this section have been met.
( c ) *Exceptions.* ( 1 ) Within 2 business days of granting a request for removal pursuant to § 382.717(a)(2)(i), FMCSA will remove information from the Clearinghouse.
( 2 ) Information about a particular driver's drug or alcohol violation may be removed in accordance with § 382.717(a)(2)(ii) and (iii) or in accordance with 49 CFR part 10.
( d ) *Driver information remains available.* Nothing in this part shall prevent FMCSA from using information removed under this section for research, auditing, or enforcement purposes.
Exhibit
31.1
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I,
Bernard Korn, Chief Executive Officer of Colonial Commercial Corp., certify
that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Colonial Commercial Corp. (the
“Registrant”);
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
 
 4. The
Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures, to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated
Subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this Annual Report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
disclosed in this Annual Report any change in the Registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s fourth fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 Date:
      April 14, 2005/s/
      Bernard KornBernard
      KornChief
      Executive OfficerChairman
      of the Board and President
From: Steve Koenig [mailto:skoenig@brcrp.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 1:55 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

The intent of this email is to comment on the proposed regulation limiting 

options in individual IRA accounts. I hope this proposal fails.

Why would this be an issue for the DoL? Why should an individual be limited 

in what he or she does to enhance their retirement? Options are a very 

useful investment tool that I and many others use to manage risk, earn 

additional income, and enhance the return in our IRAs. This has been even 

more important and useful given the current zero interest rate environment 

and volatility in the equity markets. First the Fed takes away our ability to 

earn anything on our savings, and now we learn the DoL is wanting to take 

away our ability to earn money via options in our IRAs.

Please do not impose this new regulation. Give the individual the right and 

freedom to invest their money as they choose. The ability to earn a return, 

and eventually have enough funds for retirement is already difficult 

enough. 

Thanks for the consideration.

Steven M. Koenig

1029 W. State Blvd., Suite A

Fort Wayne, IN 46808

(260) 203-5098

(260) 203-5090 Fax

** **

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 

addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email 

are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated:  August 5, 2010
    /s/ Ben M. BrighamBen M. BrighamChief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board
https://fdms.erulemaking .net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=...

REGC- 14F651-04

LEGAL PRU EoSiNG DIVISION FEB 23 2010
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS
BRANCH

As of: February 23, 2010
Received: February 21, 2010
PUBLIC SUBMISSION [revei:i
Posted: February 23, 2010
Tracking No. 80aa95d5
Comments Due: May 03, 2010
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0006
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants & Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Comment On: IRS-2010-0006-0001
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Document: IRS-2010-0006-0043
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-02028

Submitter Information

Name: Mike
Address:
Dallas, TX,

General Comment

You have to be kidding me? No way in hell! I will cash my retirement out before I let the grubby
government take anything that I have. YOU HAVE DONE SUCH A FINE JOB WITH EVERYTHING
ELSE!!!

I can't wait until the conservatives take over the government and fire half the worthless people in
government who think of this crap.

Page | of 1

2/23/2010
Page | of 1

on DIVISION
LEGAL PROCESSING 1 Ai10 _ Wy fe)
PUBLICATION HCOUSU RU AUG 17 7019

As of: August 16, 2010

PUBLIC Status: Posted

Sorry
SU BM ISSION Comments Due: ‘August 16, 2010;

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0112
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: YeonJoo leejones
Address:
Albuquerque, NM,
Submitter's Representative: Martin Heinrich
Organization: aca
Government Agency Type: State

General Comment

See attached file(s)

Attachments

IRS-2010-0010-0112.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/16/2010


August 9, 2010

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to
Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

Dr. yeonjoo lee