alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                     5,256
<SECURITIES>                               4,712
<RECEIVABLES>                             17,815
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                5,247
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          32,881
<PP&E>                                     2,240
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            43,894
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     11,944
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                     472
<OTHER-SE>                                29,998
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              43,894
<SALES>                                   30,109
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          85,139
<CGS>                                     14,050
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             77,680
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          25,670
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (404)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            7,863
<INCOME-TAX>                               2,988
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        4,875
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                               4,875
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                .89
<FN>
NOTE:  RECEIVABLES AND PP&E VALUES REPORTED REPRESENT NET AMOUNTS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 32000Y1212(01)

**Commission communication pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 - Modification by the United Kingdom of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services between the Shetland mainland (Tingwall/Sumburgh) and the islands of Foula, Fair Isle, Out Skerries and Papa Stour (Text with EEA relevance)***Official Journal C 356 , 12/12/2000 P. 0003 - 0003*

Commission communication pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92

Modification by the United Kingdom of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services between the Shetland mainland (Tingwall/Sumburgh) and the islands of Foula, Fair Isle, Out Skerries and Papa Stour

(2000/C 356/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

1. The United Kingdom has decided to modify the public service obligations in respect of the scheduled air services between the Shetland mainland (Tingwall/Sumburgh) and the islands of Foula, Fair Isle, Out Skerries and Papa Stour as set out in the notice published in the Official Journal of the European Communities C 394 of 30 December 1997 pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes.

2. The modified public service obligations are as follows:

- Minimum frequencies:

- to Foula from Tingwall - two return trips on Monday, Wednesday and Friday and one return trip on Tuesday (summer service). Two return trips on Friday and one return trip on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Saturday (winter service),

- to Fair Isle - Two return trips from Tingwall on Monday, Wednesday and Friday; and two return trips from Sumburgh on Saturday (summer service). Two return trips from Tingwall on Monday, Wednesday and Friday (winter service),

- to Out Skerries from Tingwall - Two return trips on Thursday and one return trip on Monday, Wednesday and Friday,

- to Papa Stour from Tingwall - Two return trips on Tuesday.

- Capacity:

- the capacity of the aircraft used should be not less than eight seats on each route although, depending on weight, numbers may be restricted on the Out Skerries route.

- Fares:

The price of a single adult ticket must not exceed GBP 21,30 (Foula), GBP 37,20 (Fair Isle), GBP 18,00 (Out Skerries) and GBP 16,00 (Papa Stour).

The maximum fare on each route may be increased once every year with the prior written consent of Shetland Islands Council in line with the United Kingdom's retail price index (all items) or any successor index to this.

No other changes may be made to the fare levels without the prior written consent of Shetland Islands Council.

The new maximum fare on each route must be notified to the Civil Aviation Authority and will enter into force after its publication by the European Commission in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
From: John Orange [mailto:jo_trashbucket@bellsouth.net] 

Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 10:31 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

I have the following comments about the Request for Information Regarding Lifetime 

Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in Retirement Plans. 

 

1. I DO NOT trust the government to manage my money as well as I would manage it 

myself. Nobody is a better steward of my money than me. I have a vested interest to 

make sure I have sufficient funds to live 

 the lifestyle I wish to live once I have retired. I DO NOT want the government 

establishing what my lifestyle should be. 

 

2. The Federal Government has proven time after time that the are the WORST money 

managers on the planet. If I managed my budget the way the federal government 

manages theirs I would be in prison. 

 

3. I don't trust the goverment to use my money for what it is supposed to be used for. 

Look at the Social Security System. How much of that money has been squandered on 

ridiculous programs. 

 

4. I have no doubt I can invest this money and can do much better than the federal 

government. 

 

5. It is not the responsibility of the government to insure that I or anyone else has a 

guaranteed income. I want to be responsible for myself. I don't want the government 

taking care of me, I want to take care of 

 myself. 

 

6. LEAVE MY MONEY ALONE, YOU ALREADY TAKE TOO MUCH FROM ME. I 

PAID $62,000 IN TAXES LAST YEAR, ISN'T THIS 

ENOUGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Exhibit 32.13



          Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
            pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Spectrum Organic
Products, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Robert B. Fowles, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2)   the information contained in the Report presents fairly, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                                  /s/ Robert B. Fowles
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Robert B. Fowles
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  May 6, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 29 April 2004

in Case C-496/99 P: Commission of the European Communities v CAS Succhi di Frutta SpA (1)

(Appeal - Common Agricultural Policy - Food aid - Commission decision amending conditions after the contracts awarded - Payment of tenderers in fruit other than those specified in the notice of invitation to tender)

(2004/C 118/04)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-496/99 P: appeal by the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: initially F. Ruggeri Laderchi, and subsequently T. van Rijn and L. Visaggio, assisted by A. Dal Ferro) against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Second Chamber) of 14 October 1999 in Joined Cases T-191/96 and T-106/97 CAS Succhi di Frutta SpA v Commission [1999] ECR II-3181, seeking to have that judgment set aside, the other party to the proceedings being: CAS Succhi di Frutta SpA, established in Castagnaro (Italy) (lawyers: initially A. Tizzano, G.M. Roberti and F. Sciaudone, and subsequently G.M. Roberti and F. Sciaudone): - the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of: V. Skouris, acting for the President of the Sixth Chamber, J. N. Cunha Rodrigues, J.-P. Puissochet, R. Schintgen (Rapporteur), and F. Macken, Judges; S. Alber, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 29 April 2004, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 79 of 18.3.2000

----
§ 566.5 Requirements. Each manufacturer of a motor vehicle (other than a replica motor vehicle), and each manufacturer of covered equipment, shall furnish the information specified in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section to *https://vpic.nhtsa.dot.gov/* or to: Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. Manufacturers of replica motor vehicles shall furnish the information by using the portal at *https://vpic.nhtsa.dot.gov/*. ( a ) Full individual, partnership, or corporate name of the manufacturer.
( b ) Residence address of the manufacturer and State of incorporation if applicable.
( c ) Description of each type of motor vehicle or of covered equipment manufactured by the manufacturer, including, for motor vehicles, the approximate ranges of gross vehicle weight ratings for each type. ( 1 ) Except as noted below, the description may be of general types, such as “passenger cars” or “brake fluid.”
( 2 ) In the case of multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks, and trailers, the description shall be specific enough also to indicate the types of use for which the vehicles are intended, such as “tank trailer,” “motor home,” or “cargo van.”
( 3 ) In the case of motor vehicles produced in two or more stages, if the manufacturer is an incomplete vehicle manufacturer, the description shall so state and include a description indicating the stage of completion of the vehicle and, where known, the types of use for which the vehicle is intended.
( 4 ) In the case of replica motor vehicles, the manufacturer shall include, in the description of each type of motor vehicle it manufactures, a designation that the vehicle is a replica motor vehicle. Example: “Incomplete vehicle manufacturer—Chassis-cab intended for completion as van-type truck.”
If the manufacturer is an intermediate manufacturer, or a final stage manufacturer, the description shall so state and include a brief description of the work performed. Example: “Multipurpose passenger vehicles: Motor homes with GVWR from 8,000 to 12,000 pounds. Final-stage manufacturer—add body to bare chassis.”
(15 U.S.C. 1392, 1397)
[36 FR 20978, Nov. 2, 1971, as amended at 37 FR 1364, Jan. 28, 1972; 87 FR 13232, Mar. 9, 2022]
#### § 585.41 Scope.

This subpart establishes requirements for manufacturers of passenger cars, multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks, and buses with a GVWR of 4,536 kg (10,000 lb) or less to respond to NHTSA inquiries, to submit reports, and to maintain records related to the reports, concerning the number of such vehicles that meet the upgraded requirements of Standard No. 301, *Fuel systems integrity* (49 CFR 571.301).
Motion Granted; Reversed and Rende re d and Memorandum Opinion filed January

2 4 , 20 12

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 10

- 0 1018

- CV

____________ STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY , Appellant

V.

SUGAR LAND

— SETTLERS WAY/PONDEROSA, LTD., Appellee

On Appeal from the 61st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2008

- 40783



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from judgment signed August 9, 2010. On January 17 , 20 12 , the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal because they have reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences in the underlying suit. The parties ask this court

to reverse the judgment of the court below and re nder judgmen t effectuating the parties’ agreement

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). We grant the motion

.2

Accordingly, the judgment of the court below is reversed and we render judgment that Sugar Land

— Settlers Way/Ponderosa, Ltd. take nothing of and from Stewart Title Guaranty Company.
We order the supersedeas bond number 22 030 020, posted on August 13, 2010, by Stewart Title Guaranty Company, as Principal, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, as Surety, in the amount of $2,971,78 3.00, released , and the surety, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, is released from its obligations under the bond

. Costs on appeal are taxed against the party incurring the same.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Seymore and Christopher

.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 37 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     February 13, 2001.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and he is hereby, elected to 
the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Financial Services: Mr. Sanders.
    Committee on Government Reform: Mr. Sanders.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 31.1 

 

I, Jack V. Chambers, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Texas-New Mexico Power Company; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986] 

 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and as presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and; 

 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial. 

 

Date: March 2, 2004
EXHIBIT 10.2

                                                                  Enclosure # 1.

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

FOR THE VALUE RECEIVED, being Eight Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand Nine Hundred
Twenty Dollars ($875,920), delivery and receipt which is hereby acknowledged
this seventh day of November 2003, Medical Staffing Solutions, Inc./TeleScience
..International, Inc. (TIT) located at 8150 Leesburg Pile, Suite 1200, Vienna, VA
22182, hereby agrees and promises to pay to the order of B.B. Sahay, of 1398
Park Lake Drive, Reston, VA 20190, the said amount together with no interest per
annum at the end of twelve months from the date of execution of this note. That
is, the value of this note at maturity on November 7, 2004 will be Eight Hundred
Seventy Five Thousand Nine Hundred Twenty Dollars ($875,920).

If this note is not paid at the maturity pursuant to its terms, the Holder of
the Note is entitled to all remedies at law, together with costs of collection
and suit and reasonable attorney's fees.

This Note shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
Virginia.


                                        By:
-----------------------------------        -------------------------------------
           (Date)                          B.B. Sahay
                                           Medical Staffing Solutions, Inc./
                                           TeleScience International. Inc.
                                           (Company)
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 31, 1995 (137), Para 137.31 Petitions, Etc.]
[Page 1822]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.137.31  petitions, etc.

  Under clause 1 of rule XXII,

       45. The SPEAKER presented a petition of the Syracuse Common 
     Council, Syracuse, NY, relative to the Low Income Housing Tax 
     Credit Program; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 
     and Means.
```
From: John Walker Wood [mailto:john@woodfirm.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 5:22 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Cc: john@woodfirm.com

Subject: RIN 1210-AB39

To DOL: 

I am an attorney in Seattle, Washington. I represent disabled claimants in ERISA disability 

claims. I write to comment on the proposed 90-day delay regarding the new ERISA claim 

regulations. The new claims ERISA regulations were exhaustively evaluated and considered by 

the public and all interested parties. The insurance companies and others had ample 

opportunity to (and did) provide substantial comments. There is no reasonable basis for 

opening up the process so that the same objections and concerns can be raised all over again. 

Please do not delay the implementation of the new ERISA claims regulations. They are fair to all 

sides, and, as the DOL has already concluded, do not meaningfully raise costs for claims 

administration. The new ERISA claims regulations clarify and simplify the claims process and will 

lead to more fair and efficient claims decisions.

John Walker Wood

The Wood Law Firm, PLLC

800 5th Ave, Ste 4100

Seattle, WA 98104

206-650-0765
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

**Supplement to Registrant’s Registration Statements on Form S-8**

 

In accordance with the requirements of Form S-8, the registrant herebysupplements any discussion of the indemnification provisions of the registrant in all of the registrant’s registration statements previously filed on Form S-8 with the following undertaking: 

 

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Actof 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers, and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission suchindemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by adirector, officer, or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit, or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer, or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrantwill, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and willbe governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 61 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 61

 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Education and 
           the Workforce in the One Hundred Seventh Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 2001

Mr. Boehner (for himself and Mr. George Miller of California) submitted 
the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Education and 
           the Workforce in the One Hundred Seventh Congress.

    Resolved, 

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Education and the Workforce 
(hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), 
including the expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out 
of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for 
committee salaries and expenses, not more than $15,590,870.00 for the 
One Hundred Seventh Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $8,137,966.00 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2001, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2002; and
            (2) not more than $7,452,904.00 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2002, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2003.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 670.3 Policy.

The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) has adopted the principles and methods of Safety Management Systems (SMS) as the basis for enhancing the safety of public transportation in the United States. FTA will follow the principles and methods of SMS in its development of rules, regulations, policies, guidance, best practices and technical assistance administered under the authority of 49 U.S.C. 5329.