alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of eAutoclaims, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 17, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Eric
Seidel, the President and CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of eAutoclaims, Inc.

/s/ Eric Seidel
-------------------------------
Print Name:  Eric Seidel
Title: President & CEO
March 17, 2006
§ 663.43 Certification that Federal motor vehicle standards do not apply. ( a ) Except for rolling stock subject to paragraph (b) of this section, if a vehicle purchased under this part is not subject to the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards issued by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in part 571 of this title, the recipient shall keep on file its certification that it received a statement to that effect from the manufacturer.
( b ) This subpart shall not apply to rolling stock that is not a motor vehicle.
# U.S. Central Command supports humanitarian assistance, disaster relief efforts in Syria and Türkiye

/ Published Feb. 22, 2023

Feb. 22, 2023Release Number 20230222-01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla. –** To support ongoing U.S. assistance led by the U.S. Agency for International Development, CENTCOM moved U.S. military tents from Bahrain to Incirlik Air Base in Türkiye for onward movement to affected areas in Syria and Türkiye.

At the air base, CENTCOM troops downloaded the tents, which can house more than 4,000 displaced people, for transport to areas of need by USAID international partners. In total, CENTCOM sent more than 300,000 pounds of aid. “We extend our deepest condolences to the families who have fallen victim to the Feb. 20th aftershock, which has compounded the suffering of those already impacted by the recent earthquakes,” said Gen. Michael “Erik” Kurilla. “Our focus remains on providing support to the people continuing to suffer as a result of these disasters.

“We’ve been working closely with USAID, the U.S. State Department, the United Nations, and U.S. European Command to determine how to assist and what kind of assistance to provide. That coordination will continue. Throughout CENTCOM, we are committed to providing support as requested to those in need in Syria and Türkiye.”

-30-

PLEASE NOTE: Imagery for this event/press release can be found at https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1JWPM8DdmxzHHMoUu8eaI-RNlE3qZSf3W
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date:

2 p.m., Friday, September 28, 2007.

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered:

Rule Enforcement Review.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

David A. Stawick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-4594 Filed 9-12-07; 2:02 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 23, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57478-57479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18087]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Open Grid Alliance, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that on June 16, 2023, pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Open Grid Alliance, Inc. 
(``OGA'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the

[[Page 57479]]

Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, CONNECT Centre, Dublin, IRELAND, has been added as a 
party to this venture.
    Also, Accedian Networks, Inc., St-Laurent, CANADA; Arm, Ltd., 
Cambridge, UNITED KINGDOM; DriveNets, Ra'anana, ISRAEL; and Macrometa, 
San Mateo, CA, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and OGA intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On March 31, 2022, OGA filed its original notification pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on May 12, 
2022 (87 FR 29180).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 28, 
2022. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on June 12, 2023 (88 FR 38099).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-18087 Filed 8-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSH SILVEY,

Appellant,

v.

JENNIFER SILVEY,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-1861

[December 14, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Roger B. Colton, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. 

2014DR001821XXXXMB.

Richard L. Rosenbaum of Law Offices of Richard Rosenbaum, Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellant.

Daniel Bachert of The Bachert Law Firm, P.A., West Palm Beach, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., LEVINE, J., and SINGHAL, RAAG, Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 41184 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JUAN FRANCISCO LOPEZ

- HERNANDEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:16

- CR

- 293

- 1

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Francisco Lopez

- Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez

- Hernand ez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 9, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-41184 Document: 00514545592 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/09/2018No. 17

- 41184

2 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s

mo tion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-41184 Document: 00514545592 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/09/2018
#### § 655.34 Use following an accident.

Each employer shall prohibit alcohol use by any covered employee required to take a post-accident alcohol test under § 655.44 for eight hours following the accident or until he or she undergoes a post-accident alcohol test, whichever occurs first.
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2015-3144 Directorate Identifier: 2014-NM-110-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Modification via 

SB 8.0 $ 680.00 $3,510 $4,190.00 18 $75,420.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $75,420

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): All airplanes 

will be covered under warranty with no associated costs.
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
#### § 99.735-80 Applicability.

The provisions of this subpart apply only to employees who terminated government service before January 1, 1991.

[58 FR 7995, Feb. 11, 1993]
From: CMosquito@aol.com [mailto:CMosquito@aol.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 9:03 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 

We must reject the notion that one man's "need" gives him an automatic moral claim on 

another man's wealth. Government without integrity, both ethically and fiscally, results 

in chaos. Be satisfied with the tax I pay and stay out of my private affairs.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

As independent certified public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of our reports included in this Form 10-K, into the
Company's previously filed Registrations Statements on Form S-3 (Registration
Statement File Nos. 33-70326, 33-49176 and 33-81436), Form S-4/A (Registration
Statement File No. 333-36375) and Forms S-8 (Registration Statement File Nos.
33-42516, 33-63501, 33-63503, 33-63499, 333-03937, 333-08475, 333-45691,
333-58771, 333-8225 and 333-59382).


ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Fort Lauderdale, Florida,
  March 7, 2002.
Forms
S-3No. 33-44159
    
    $200,000,000 aggregate principal amount of the Companys Debt
SecuritiesNo. 333-89149
    
    Registration of securities not to exceed an initial public offering
price of $1,200,000,000No. 333-161870
    
    Registration of 1,527,778 shares of the Companys common stockNo. 333-166745
    
    Shelf Registration of 4,000,000 shares of the Companys common stockForms
S-8No. 2-58577
    
    Thrift and Profit Sharing PlanNo. 33-35071
    
    Texarkana Pre-Tax Savings PlanNo. 33-47980
    
    1991 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee DirectorsNo. 33-47981
    
    Pre-Tax Savings Plan at the Findlay PlantNo. 333-09619
    
    1996 Stock Option PlanNo. 333-83311
    
    Pre-Tax Savings Plan (Clarksdale)No. 333-83309
    
    1998 Employee Stock Option Plan1998 Incentive Compensation PlanNo. 333-83589
    
    1998 Non-Employee Directors Compensation Deferral PlanNo. 333-84815
    
    Thrift & Profit Sharing PlanNo. 333-84813
    
    Texarkana Pre-Tax Savings PlanNo. 333-84811
    
    Pre-Tax Savings Plan at the Findlay PlantNo. 333-103007
    
    2001 Incentive Compensation PlanNo. 333-113315
    
    Pre-Tax Savings Plan at the Auburn PlantPre-Tax Savings Plan (Bowling Green  Hose)Pre-Tax Savings Plan (Bowling Green  Sealing)Pre-Tax Savings Plan (Clarksdale)Pre-Tax Savings Plan at the El Dorado PlantPre-Tax Savings Plan at the Findlay PlantTexarkana Pre-Tax Savings PlanNo. 333-138811
    
    Pre-Tax Savings Plan (Findlay)Pre-Tax Savings Plan (Texarkana)No. 333-142136
    
    2006 Incentive Compensation PlanNo. 333-157778
    
    Spectrum Investment PlanPre-Tax Savings Plan (Findlay)Pre-Tax Savings Plan (Texarkana)No. 333-167231
    
    2010 Incentive Compensation Plan
 /s/ Ernst & Young LLPERNST & YOUNG LLP
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MELITA INTERNATIONAL FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,807
<SECURITIES>                                    23,735
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,856
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (6,651)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,556
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,659
<PP&E>                                           4,537
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,234
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,431
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            69
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,734
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,234
<SALES>                                         47,127
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,127
<CGS>                                           18,205
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,205
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,915
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (336)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,343
<INCOME-TAX>                                       212
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,131
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,131
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .59
        

</TABLE>
¥

0&

&-CJV. ..,//J//JA,.

/t^^/Z^ry^t^c^Q^i'o/U- £?—/L£L '/_ t/r,.^

£/-<a-C* 'cL/Ucz-^tZje^

-/sl/*iC*Jbl/!Lsirs.r'ttfUSc^

illB"

JfjZ6^Cstt./6-/J!- ^Atr/—^a~-L^ /L ZiUi^s^C

sLo_iy__yc;f^/^> £L/L-—vOjex/^r'/

Maa^UbouZl ff/M/oTT.

£c^£_ Sl£l /&*<!'*-''SS' , ,*7 S /$&.

C/tri^a-/-//£L <*l?^il_ ^/r>r/_<^^,rfJ-Cl-CVtf^C> . Y—Jj-d-Ce? <" <?&s- /£ f?cs* ^^

•^J&6&£&-JZ^ f-*S"-

<fC Sf<ZC*'t> *<^-

^*

'ft /** ^e'trjtC-fe^S:

Z^A^^^^Ze^^rzCc^- /(V •SXy/-<3X/ /ty^± ./cs,/jW-7 0S C/ii/C^. A/JCcSjlsi diLs

MSV£- klsvl @r<?v,'r,j. , (/-hv. r/^ fig^Xvvr/^K-o^/ ^<^ ^/g'. foytry£

-A,^2^/V7

•\>— . ^

^c/LC^/^ er<ai_>irfez_efrc^
^Pr.AJ /'Vt/AeOa*

flwfaz

/S/Jf-f £(-/ /** ft*' '(~-tO

:<s?j: ytz^.6testlCZtr^S off* /i^<2i/r.-/0.«. -Ift<.'<

e CO fijl C.0~\

5V C7c/K/ to o>iC/ 6?6(r-< £/eXrt'cs<5L cS r M_0_ Ar/1^1 a v-\xo ^, A* /&//'' C£>/2'<,t.j? <%> /^X

6/a?<~ A&<T<* C(t/Ae

'{//-/XtiS /•* <?S/<>•(/f €<; Cc^S /^<A.'^_ tTfU d-tetft-/^ Cc^uu /y -jet,/

se A <fu.Sc^ /<j /Ce/ s*i f^ /* , y <f A /is'<?s~tsjr-e' /At / eycjc /t>s-~ y /<

Ojcu&i^-.

s*7/ZK/e> crff'*> cAe*~ As^ AfeAs' (j/U<*~ /fecfisi *jaj f t<s A-^V^A?

C&tU Aaxr r^fe/if&s gv <rf<zt'f-Ss Capti Ay JT^tA. clA ^g^f/f?

/rl<? A****'' fire;<<»'<&.<? 4.0K ^/^v*^^- & s*A\/<x- & S<st/ar~r /*/*£,«*

C# sri//rsvt<3 ff<? Aso £~Krsr/s-'d~ /^rj AVt'ote'C/• <~c '^ ^ \o Uo

£_€ d<3.ryaj^Al^/e> fS^c #QAV'c

Ll_

^C

<**^
/ jaAai,0-J>_/L<x_

'M*/*-

s*~ <Z-/y&t&'C- -A/c^i/<z^-*^4^A-<^>-

-£LS C-*s_ ./£>* <e>A<L£>^ -fSLCL,— yjf rs s** A & S~ S <<. . V •s 't/s•<?'OZ7* /(*

i^t^-e <?Ls--A-~*-— e*r c-,- j ,sA*r_ r~t/ fX/V/(S

a *-*ac /&S^O^L__Y—iA^Si. <g><XJSVr su^cldA*z***r-e—-

-.t-O—ji^S

fl0tv>ar4./jA yj/DfA- yf(ltg//^

/ies,V>' S"^ fe^cs y<?*ss/ssL/s~,

A*~ s~ Ax /(s<?A*x <?"' &'C/ t/y y^f

-Xjo /us si<^ /^s Atj^si a£ <?.rsAe?L A^^2l^-y~~/^^^»<^A^^/^ <^A_

^/^-^/^^.^A^AL^y^yc^ £k<L^y£^A^y-s:*^^.,-Atss' or*?. /# /7£c^^-?-><yALc,^&^-

A/& • s+?S s/yy /^"/v^^«t'tg>c/ fo/^i A/fA*c - e? &£<£S-<2-^-C3~^-e2'-^A?

/)*'A<ec;c?riSf<L(/£?, •&*> A* s*7S Po m/A'a-r>>7 c? ,. ?c<f tfA''^ 1/tyt'o.s Ass-r~&s-e5

i.OiU ^jIo/^l^^A^s.. >^_^^ &a' 6?^>^:*e*A£> /&.

./£/<?—/CW-£—y£^A&^-<Z-'LSL, -a?— 5£ y£*Ay*. .. eLSL«-_^^C^^^'-Sy<^_- rn r*j?.^<g^

^ arms's*

,<>%^ ceyAAA'y^ ^A^/AA'kss/A1* '<p- Y /^g /A^wj,? v^s/'&-&/>*$. e.A/rA<*y£> ?/&

Ccj*s/^/r/*fz<y'£t'' ^s y£y& <&fyy'<v Aisj'cA'^y-. ^ - /&•"«<- P^ <r Yo /Cgy-t*... <=z~

^/-t^^y-T*C\/^ AAf^^^f^GS Ao Zcacl&aC^H^ C^ A'ArtS—^ A^—

'A s?y-A?'<& f^f A*s~ SJ? o /*>( y /(/<*l &Ay~ csjc/gl crA^A^c-^<, A*0 r y*1 r- — f •

A/ZA?s<zy^c^
----

Action brought on 15 March 2004 by OJSC Bratsk Aluminium Plant against the Council of the European Union

(Case T-111/04)

(2004/C 106/171)

Language of the case: English

An action against the Council of the European Union was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 15 March 2004 by OJSC Bratsk Aluminium Plant, Bratsk, Russia, represented by Dr K. Adamantopoulos, lawyer and Mr J. Branton,Solicitor.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The contested measure, Council Regulation (EC) No. 2229/2003 (1), imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of silicon originating in Russia and as part of that imposed a 22.7 % duty on silicon originating in Russia. The applicant, a Russian company producing silicon, requests the annulment of this application.

In support of its application the applicant contends that the Council violated article 2 paragraphs 8 and 9 of Regulation 384/1996 (2), committed a manifest error of assessment and breached a fundamental procedural requirement by failing to accept that the applicant and its trader in the British Virgin Islands are related. The applicant further contends that it was denied its right to a fair hearing since the Council failed to conduct an additional verification visit in respect to that allegation. According to the applicant the Council also violated Article 18 paragraph 4 of regulation 384/1996 when it rejected evidence supplied by the applicant. The applicant also invokes a violation of article 20 paragraph 4 of Regulation 384/1996 consisting in the Council's failure to provide a proper statement of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was proposed to impose definitive measures. The applicant finally submits that the contested regulation mistakenly considered the applicant's domestic sales as unprofitable and inflated the assessment of dumping, by rejecting the applicant's electricity costs and adjusting them upwards by reference to irrelevant factors. On this basis the applicant contends that the contested regulation violated Article 2 paragraphs 5 and 7 (b and c) of Regulation 384/1996, committed a manifest error of assessment and failed to state proper reasons.

----

(1)  Official Journal L 339, 24/12/2003 P. 3-13.

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community, Official Journal L 056, 06/03/1996 P. 1-20.

----