alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 573.1 Scope. This part: ( a ) Sets forth the responsibilities under 49 U.S.C. 30116-30121 of manufacturers of motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment with respect to safety-related defects and noncompliances with Federal motor vehicle safety standards in motor vehicles and items of motor vehicle equipment; and
( b ) Specifies requirements for— ( 1 ) Manufacturers to maintain lists of owners, purchasers, dealers, and distributors notified of defective and noncomplying motor vehicles and motor vehicle original and replacement equipment,
( 2 ) Reporting to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) defects in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment and noncompliances with motor vehicle safety standards prescribed under part 571 of this chapter, and
( 3 ) Providing quarterly reports on defect and noncompliance notification campaigns.
[69 FR 34959, June 23, 2004]
From: Tracy Collins [mailto:tracy@tracycollins.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 2:00 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Please do not delay DOL Regulations

Dear Sir or Madam,

My name is Tracy Collins. I am an attorney working in southern California. I have been 

representing individuals in ERISA claims and litigation for more than 25 years.

I am requesting that the DOL not delay the implementation of the new claims regulations. DOL 

evaluated in-put from claimants, insurance companies, plans and others during the rule making 

process. I am not a golfer but it sure looks to me that the insurance companies are looking for a 

Mulligan. You know what I mean, what young children call a "do-over." If the insurance 

companies don't like the result, and want to undo DOL's hard work then the insurance companies 

need to follow the APA and its regulations.

Without doubt ERISA is a mean law that leads to very unfair results, particularly in litigation of 

long-term-disability claims. When insurance companies don't live up to their end of the bargain, 

too often the tax-payer has to pitch in to assist a fellow citizen from avoiding a life of poverty.

The amendments to the regulations that must take effect early next year provide for some 

balance between sick and injured people and insurance companies and plans. We are a country 

that must follow the rule of law. If regulations are duly enacted, the regulations must be 

implemented and followed.

Tracy Collins 

Law Offices of Tracy Collins 

5739 Kanan Road, Suite 415 

Agoura Hills, CA 91301 

Phone (818) 889-2441 

Fax (818) 889-1210 

www.tracycollins.com
From: COOLGLUE@aol.com [mailto:COOLGLUE@aol.com] 

Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2010 7:18 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Annuities

Annuities should be an option for retirement, as long as it is not mandated (you have to take an 

annuity when retiring) and there is more than one type (fixed, spousal, inflation adjusted, 

etc,) available.
IV

House Calendar No. 180

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 462

[Report No. 107–537]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5011) making appropriations

for military construction, family housing, and base realignment and closure for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September

30, 2003, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 26, 2002

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5011) making

appropriations for military construction, family housing,

and base realignment and closure for the Department

of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30,

2003, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of

3 rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 5011) making appropriations for
2

HRES 462 RH

1 military construction, family housing, and base realign2 ment and closure for the Department of Defense for the

3 fiscal year ending September 30, 2003, and for other pur4 poses. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with.

5 All points of order against consideration of the bill are

6 waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and

7 shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled

8 by the chairman and ranking minority member of the

9 Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the

10 bill shall be considered for amendment under the five11 minute rule. Points of order against provisions of the bill

12 for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived.

13 During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chair14 man of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority

15 in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering

16 an amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion

17 of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose

18 in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall

19 be considered as read. At the conclusion of consideration

20 of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and

21 report the bill to the House with such amendments as may

22 have been adopted. The previous question shall be consid23 ered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to
3

HRES 462 RH

1 final passage without intervening motion except one mo2 tion to recommit with or without instructions.

3 SEC. 2. House Resolution 421 is laid on the table.
House Calendar No. 180

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 462

[Report No. 107–537]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5011)

making appropriations for military construction,family housing, and base realignment and closurefor the Department of Defense for the fiscal yearending September 30, 2003, and for other purposes.

JUNE 26, 2002

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-60495, 333-107873, 333-104253 and 333-104252) and Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-57501, 333-70229, 333-86037 and 333-86153) of Alpharma Inc. of our report dated February 27, 2004 relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

 

Florham Park, New Jersey

 

March 12, 2004
#### George Rogers, Respondent, v. John H. Murray and another, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Boardman, J.
From: Bugzy Segal [mailto:bugzyseg@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 10:15 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

You just don't know when to stop, huh? 

I am cashing my 401K out - I'd rather lose to direct taxes and penalty than let you tell me 

what is good for me. 

Sick of it
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1123.html[7/22/2015 12:11:50 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-c2wt

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1123

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I know how I want to spend my own money that I worked hard for I'm sure you wouldn't want other people

 dictating when and how you can spend your hard earned money
#### § 586.13 Revocation of registrations.

NHTSA may require registrants to provide information related to compliance with the requirements of this part at any time. NHTSA may revoke an existing registration or deny a registration based on a failure to comply with requirements of this part or a finding of a safety-related defect or unlawful conduct under 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 *et seq.* that poses a significant safety risk. Prior to the revocation of the registration, NHTSA will provide the registrant a reasonable opportunity to correct deficiencies, if such are correctable, based on the sole discretion of NHTSA.
----

----

I Information

Commission

----

Euro exchange rates (1)

23 June 2004

(2004/C 165/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----

----

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Council Directive 93/42/EEC

(2004/C 165/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

Publication of titles and references of harmonized standards under the directive

Example:For EN 60601-1:1990, the following applies:

----

(1)  CEN: rue de Stassart/De Stassartstraat 36, B - 1050 Brussels, tel: (32-2) 550 08 11, fax: (32-2) 550 08 19

CENELEC: rue de Stassart/De Stassartstraat 35, B - 1050 Brussels, tel: (32-2) 519 68 71, fax: (32-2) 519 69 19

ETSI: BP 152, F - 06561 Valbonne Cedex, tel: (33) 492 94 42 12, fax: (33) 493 65 47 16

----
Carroll,

June, 1900.

#### Aldrich & *a., Adm’rs, v.*Whitaker & *a.*

Bill in Equity, to foreclose a mortgage given by the defendants to the plaintiffs’ testator to secure their joint note. Trial by the court. Subject to exception, the defendants were permitted to show that there was no consideration for the note. The court found that the note was without consideration and ordered the bill dismissed, and the plaintiffs excepted.

*Josiah Soils*and *John C. L. Wood,*for the plaintiffs.

*James A. Bdgerly*and *John B. Nash,*for the defendants.

Young, J.

The question the plaintiffs have discussed is not in the case, for this is an action to collect a note. Want of consideration is a defence to such an action when it is brought by the original payee of the note or his personal representatives *(Murray*v. *Whitcomb,*58 N. H. 50), and may be shown by parol evidence. *Bigelow*v. *Bigelow,*93 Me. 439. No question of law is raised by the other exception.

*Sxceptions overruled.*

Parsons, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
Docket: EBSA-2008-0011 

Investment Advice—Participants and Beneficiaries 

Comment On: EBSA-2008-0011-0054 

Investment Advice - Participants and Beneficiaries 

Document: EBSA-2008-0011-DRAFT-0075 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: james k cullinane 

Address: 

119 soundview terrace 

northport, NY, 11768 

Email: jcullinane1@verizon.ney 

General Comment 

i would like to see a universal saving account for everybody replacing all 401 k and all ira. giving 

everyone the FREEDOM to invest for retirement with any finanical institution. then the whole financial 

industry would have to compete with passive investing ie vanguard index funds and low cost funds 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: April 23, 2010 

Received: April 19, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80adb331 

Comments Due: May 05, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=Print&PrintId=0900006480adb3... 4/23/2010
Page 1 of 1

EGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 9 73 .
PUBLICATION REGULATIONS BECHBIIRA 10 wus $m

As of: August 05, 2010

PUBLIC Status: Posted

Posted: August 05, 2010
SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0018
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Jean B Gooding
Address:

1250 I St, NW, #400

Washington, DC, 20005
Email: jgooding@discus.org
Phone: 202-682-8829
Organization: Distilled Spirits Council

General Comment

As the Healthcare plan administrator for my small company, I have seen our costs for group
health insurance increase dramatically. We try to manage costs by making adjustments to plan
design including adjusting deductibles, copays and the like, or bidding out our contract to other
carriers, We moved to an HRA plan in 2009.

Now we are concerned that these cost management techniques will be impossible to employ and
still maintain grandfathered status. We offer an excellent plan to our employees which includes
most of the new mandated provisions such as full coverage for annual check-ups and routine
diagnostic tests. However, as a small group our broker tells us to expect a 20 - 35% increase in
premiums for the 2011 calendar year.

If small plans such as ours were able to bundle together into an employer health insurance
exchange, we feel our costs could be better managed, and we could have more leverage with the
insurance carriers as our risk pool would be larger.

We urge Congress to make Insurance Exchanges for small businesses a reality.

https://fdms.erulemaking .net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 8/5/2010
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 351

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 3022) to provide for a

program of temporary enhanced unemployment benefits.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 26, 2002

Mr. SHOWS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 3022) to

provide for a program of temporary enhanced unemployment benefits.

1 Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this

2 resolution the House shall without intervention of any

3 point of order consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3022)

4 to provide for a program of temporary enhanced unem5 ployment benefits. The bill shall be considered as read for

6 amendment. An amendment in the nature of a substitute

7 consisting of the text of the Senate amendment to H.R.

8 3090 shall be considered as adopted. Points of order

9 against provisions of the bill, as amended, are waived. The

10 previous question shall be considered as ordered on the
2

HRES 351 IH

1 bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening mo2 tion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, as amended,

3 equally divided and controlled by the chairman and rank4 ing minority member of the Committee on Ways and

5 Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without

6 instructions.

Æ
From: Curtis Wendler [mailto:cwendler@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 9:01 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

I'll tell you what my view is in very simple terms. This is government coercion and 

theft, pure and simple. I don't need a bunch of government clowns telling me how to 

run my life or use the assets I've accumulated. You want to see anger? People will be 

in the streets with blood in their eyes if you try to impose this massive government 

seizure of private assets. 

Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now.
Editorial Note on Part 397
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 397 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 397.207 Preemption notice. ( a ) If the applicant is other than a State, political subdivision thereof, or Indian tribe, the applicant shall mail a copy of the application to the State, political subdivision thereof, or Indian tribe concerned, accompanied by a statement that comments may be submitted regarding the application to the Administrator within 45 days. The application filed with the Administrator must include a certification that the applicant has complied with this paragraph and must include the names and addresses of each official to whom a copy of the application was sent.
( b ) The Administrator may afford interested persons an opportunity to file written comments on the application by serving notice on any persons readily identifiable by the Administrator as persons who will be affected by the ruling sought or by publication in the Federal Register.
( c ) Each person submitting written comments to the Administrator with respect to an application filed under this section shall send a copy of the comments to the applicant and certify to the Administrator that he or she has complied with this requirement. The Administrator may notify other persons participating in the proceeding of the comments and provide an opportunity for those other persons to respond.
# Dziennik Urzędowy C 153/10 c

| | ISSN 1725-5228 |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | C 153 |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Informacje i zawiadomienia | Tom 4710 czerwca 2004 |

ISSN 1725-5228

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

C 153

Wydanie polskie

Informacje i zawiadomienia

Tom 4710 czerwca 2004

---

| Powiadomienie nr | Spis treśći | Strona |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Informacja |
| | Komisja |
| 2004/C 153/1 | Kursy walutowe euro | 1 |

Powiadomienie nr

Spis treśći

Strona

I   Informacja

Komisja

2004/C 153/1

Kursy walutowe euro

1

| PL | |
| --- | --- |

PL

---

I Informacja

Komisja

| 10.6.2004 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | C 153/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2004

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

C 153/1

---

Kursy walutowe euro (1)

9 czerwca 2004

(2004/C 153/01)

1 euro=

| | Waluta | Kurs wymiany |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | Dolar amerykański | 1,2157 |
| JPY | Jen | 132,57 |
| DKK | Korona duńska | 7,4393 |
| GBP | Funt szterling | 0,66460 |
| SEK | Korona szwedzka | 9,0925 |
| CHF | Frank szwajcarski | 1,5197 |
| ISK | Korona islandzka | 87,12 |
| NOK | Korona norweska | 8,1830 |
| BGN | Lew | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Funt cypryjski | 0,58300 |
| CZK | Korona czeska | 31,335 |
| EEK | Korona estońska | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Forint węgierski | 251,98 |
| LTL | Lit litewski | 3,4529 |
| LVL | Łat łotewski | 0,6568 |
| MTL | Lir maltański | 0,4255 |
| PLN | Złoty polski | 4,6069 |
| ROL | Lej rumuński | 40 855 |
| SIT | Tolar słoweński | 239,1400 |
| SKK | Korona słowacka | 39,955 |
| TRL | Lir turecki | 1 804 336 |
| AUD | Dolar australijski | 1,7442 |
| CAD | Dolar kanadyjski | 1,6391 |
| HKD | Dolar hong kong | 9,4773 |
| NZD | Dolar nowozelandzki | 1,9457 |
| SGD | Dolar singapurski | 2,0738 |
| KRW | Won | 1 403,10 |
| ZAR | Rand | 8,0714 |

Waluta

Kurs wymiany

USD

Dolar amerykański

1,2157

JPY

Jen

132,57

DKK

Korona duńska

7,4393

GBP

Funt szterling

0,66460

SEK

Korona szwedzka

9,0925

CHF

Frank szwajcarski

1,5197

ISK

Korona islandzka

87,12

NOK

Korona norweska

8,1830

BGN

Lew

1,9558

CYP

Funt cypryjski

0,58300

CZK

Korona czeska

31,335

EEK

Korona estońska

15,6466

HUF

Forint węgierski

251,98

LTL

Lit litewski

3,4529

LVL

Łat łotewski

0,6568

MTL

Lir maltański

0,4255

PLN

Złoty polski

4,6069

ROL

Lej rumuński

40 855

SIT

Tolar słoweński

239,1400

SKK

Korona słowacka

39,955

TRL

Lir turecki

1 804 336

AUD

Dolar australijski

1,7442

CAD

Dolar kanadyjski

1,6391

HKD

Dolar hong kong

9,4773

NZD

Dolar nowozelandzki

1,9457

SGD

Dolar singapurski

2,0738

KRW

Won

1 403,10

ZAR

Rand

8,0714

---

(1)

Źródło: referencyjny kurs wymiany walut opublikowany przez ECB.

---
KEG J4x6¥ }- 05 Page 1 of 1

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISIO;
UBLICATION & REGULATIONg APR 8 2010
BRANCH ONS.

As of: April 08, 2010
Received: April 07, 2010
Status: Posted
PUBLIC SUBMISSION [reste 0 teste
Comments Due: May 03, 2010)
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0006
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants & Beneficiaries ir
Retirement Plans

Comment On: IRS-2010-0006-0001
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Document: IRS-2010-0006-0064
Comment on FR Doc # N/A

Submitter Information

Name: John Charles Sullivan
Address:

9240 Milford Drive

Northfield, OH, 44067 1343
Email: osullivan9@roadrunner.com
Phone: 330-467-4747
Government Agency Type: Federal
Government Agency: DOL

General Comment

Iam chagrined beyond belief that Washington, DC is attempting to secure the private assets of
Americans and turn them into a deficit-funding technique.

Are you receiving your marching orders from Moscow?

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 4/8/2010
§ 807.160 Communications. ( a ) The agency shall take appropriate steps to ensure effective communication with applicants, participants, personnel of other Federal entities, and members of the public. ( 1 ) The agency shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids where necessary to afford a handicapped person an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity conducted by the agency. ( i ) In determining what type of auxiliary aid is necessary, the agency shall give primary consideration to the requests of the handicapped person.
( ii ) The agency need not provide individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices of a personal nature.
( 2 ) Where the agency communicates with applicants and beneficiaries by telephone, telecommunication devices for deaf persons (TDD's) or equally effective telecommunication systems shall be used.
( b ) The agency shall ensure that interested persons, including persons with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) The agency shall provide signage at a primary entrance to each of its inaccessible facilities, directing users to a location at which they can obtain information about accessible facilities. The international symbol for accessibility shall be used at each primary entrance of an accessible facility.
( d ) This section does not require the agency to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens. In those circumstances where agency personnel believe that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the program or activity or would result in undue financial and administrative burdens, the agency has the burden of proving that compliance with § 807.160 would result in such alteration or burdens. The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the agency head or his or her designee after considering all agency resources available for use in the funding and operation of the conducted program or activity, and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with this section would result in such an alteration or such burdens, the agency shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, handicapped persons receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.