alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>


                                                                EXHIBIT 31.2


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, MICHAEL J. SHEA, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of COMPUTER HORIZONS;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     (c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: December 30, 2003


/s/ Michael J. Shea
-------------------
MICHAEL J. SHEA
Chief Financial Officer


                                      74
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                             U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                               1,000
<CASH>                                           63
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 8,268
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              8,868
<PP&E>                                      122,543
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              140,531
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        15,150
<BONDS>                                     106,949
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                        167
<OTHER-SE>                                    1,538
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                140,531
<SALES>                                      14,502
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             14,554
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                11,142
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              6,266
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            9,017
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (11,871)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (11,871)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                               (11,871)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (73)



</TABLE>
#### § 845.14 Transcript.

A verbatim report of the investigative hearing shall be taken. Any interested person may obtain copies of the transcript from the NTSB or from the court reporting firm preparing the transcript upon payment of the fees fixed therefor. (See part 801, subpart G, Fee schedule.)
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

# Foreign Trade

Skip top of page navigation

###### You are here: Census.gov › Business & Industry ›Foreign Trade › U.S. International Trade Data

                - Main
                - About
                - Data
                - Outreach
                - AES
                - Regulations
                - Reference
                - Definitions
                - Schedule B
                - FAQs

### More DATA

                          - Trade Highlights
                          - Balance by Partner Country
                          - Country/Product Trade
                          - State/Metropolitan Data
                          - Historical Series
                          - Notices and Corrections
                          - Related Party Trade
                          - Press Releases
                          - Data Products

### Important Links

                          - Global Reach Blog
                          - Newsletters
                          - ACE AESDirect
                          Related Sites- Business and Industry
- Briefing Room
- North American Industry                Classification System (NAICS)
Economic Indicator Database
                          Textile Concordance - Monthly SubscriptionDownload a file- Click on the appropriate month below to download your file.
-  If you are having technical difficulties or need help, feel free to email us at ftd.data.dissemination@census.gov or call 301-763-2311 for immediate assistance.
- Record	      layouts of the files are  available	      online .
Select Statistical Month:- January 2016   (Available on March 4, 2016)
- February 2016    (Available on April 5, 2016) 
- March 2016    (Available on May 4, 2016)
- April 2016    (Available on June 3, 2016)
- May 2016   (Available on July 6, 2016)
- June 2016   (Available on August 5, 2016)
- July 2016   (Available on September 2, 2016)
- August 2016    (Available on October 5, 2016)
- September 2016    (Available on November 4, 2016)
- October 2016   (Available on December 6, 2016)
- November 2016   (Available January 6, 2017)
- December 2016    (Available February 7, 2017)

                          Export Training
Collection of videos to enhance export training.

Spanish Language Webinars 2020-2021 (Seminarios en Línea en Español 2020-2021)
2017 And Prior Year Webinars Archive.
Upcoming Outreach Activities
Upcoming Outreach Activities
Contact Us
				Contact the International Trade Macro Analysis Branch: Email us! or use our feedback form!

                  Call us: (301)763-2311 or 1-800-549-0595 option 4			  
CONNECT WITH US**********- Information Quality
- Data Linkage Infrastructure
- Data Protection and Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- FOIA
- Inspector General
- No FEAR Act
- U.S. Department of Commerce
- USA.gov

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
✕Is this page helpful?YesNo✕NO THANKS255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached✕Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions?  Source: U.S. Census Bureau | Foreign Trade |  ftdwebmaster@census.gov |     Last Revised:  June 17, 2022
From: Jeffrey Milne [mailto:jjmilne9@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 6:39 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Hello,

Barron’s has recently reported that the Department of Labor is considering a new proposal that 

prohibits investors from using options in individual retirement accounts.

I would like to state my objections to this proposal.

I am a retired investor who has a self-directed portfolio designed to produce an income stream 

from interest, dividends and premiums from writing covered calls. Although the stocks used for 

writing calls are approximately 20% of the portfolio, the premiums generated monthly usually 

exceeds the revenues generated by the remaining 80%.

The ability to write covered calls in my IRA is important for three reasons.

1. It is an income stream that generates valuable revenue at a time when monetary policy 

has minimized income that can be generated from bank deposits and traditional bonds.

2. It provides safety for my portfolio by allowing me to diversify my equity investments. Good 

paying dividend stocks are generally limited to utilities, REIT’s and a few other sectors. All of 

these stocks will be under price pressure as the Federal Reserve raises interest rates. The ability 

to write covered calls allow me to diversify by purchasing growth stocks which are not equally 

exposed to the rising interest rates. Typically growth stocks pay minimal or no dividends. It’s 

only the ability to generate premiums that allows me to include them in my income portfolio.

3. The premiums generated by the covered calls also provides my portfolio with some protection 

to swings in the stock market.

Writing covered calls is a conservative strategy that provides my portfolio both safety and a 

higher yield. I am hoping that the Department of Labor rejects this proposal.

Thank you.

Jeffrey Milne

5 Colt Rd

Franklin, Ma 02038

Jjmilne9@gmail.com
#### New York Terminal Company, Appellant, *v.*Charles H. Gaus, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent.

(Submitted April 29, 1912;

decided May 7, 1912.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 204 N. Y. 512.)
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A1462. SANDY JENNINGS v. EARL B. JENNINGS.

Sandy Jennings filed this direct appeal from the trial court’s “Final Order of

Divorce.” However, appeals from “judgments or orders in divorce, alimony, and

other domestic relations cases” must be made by application for discretionary appeal. 

OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2). “[C]ompliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is

jurisdictional.” Fabe v. Floyd, 199 Ga. App. 322, 332 (1) (405 SE2d 265) (1991). 

Sandy Jennings’s failure to follow the discretionary review procedure deprives us of

jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

April 16, 2018

04/16/2018
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 23, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-60194

Conference Calendar

 

TIMOTHY BROWN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JODY BRADLEY; KATRINA BOLDEN; PAUL HEISTAN,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 5:00-CV-79-S

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Timothy Brown, Mississippi state prisoner # R1098, has

appealed the magistrate judge’s judgment dismissing his civil

rights complaint with prejudice following a bench trial. Brown

has moved for preparation of the trial transcript at Government

expense. Brown does not explain in his motion why the transcript

is necessary for disposition of an issue on appeal. Accordingly,

the motion is denied. See Harvey v. Andrist, 754 F.2d 569, 571

(5th Cir. 1985); see also 28 U.S.C. § 753(f). 
No. 02-60194

- 2 -

We construe Brown’s brief as requesting leave to supplement

the record on appeal. “An appellate court may not consider new

evidence furnished for the first time on appeal and may not

consider facts which were not before the district court at the

time of the challenged ruling.” Theriot v. Parish of Jefferson,

185 F.3d 477, 491 n.26 (5th Cir. 1999). The motion is denied. 

Brown contends that the judgment was contrary to the law and

the evidence and that the magistrate judge abused his discretion

by failing to order the production of an unredacted prison log. 

It is the appellant’s responsibility to provide a transcript of

all relevant evidence to support his appellate argument. See

FED. R. APP. P. 10(b)(2); Powell v. Estelle, 959 F.2d 22, 26 (5th

Cir. 1992). As was noted above, Brown’s request for a transcript

was inadequate, and his failure to provide a transcript prevents

this court from reviewing these issues. See Richardson v. Henry,

902 F.2d 414, 416 (5th Cir. 1990). 

Because the appeal is without arguable merit, it is

dismissed as frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20

(5th Cir. 1983); see also 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. The dismissal of this

appeal as frivolous counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g). We caution Brown that once he accumulates three

strikes, he will not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in

any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or 
No. 02-60194

- 3 -

detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of

serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS DENIED; SANCTION WARNING GIVEN.
From: Jerry Glasow [mailto:jerry.glasow@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2015 6:44 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Re: RIN 1210-AB32

Everyone who sells financial products or who sells financial advise should be 

legally required have a fuduciary responsibility to place the best interests of the clients above all 

other considerations, period.
----

(2004/C 88 E/0385)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1960/03

by Elspeth Attwooll (ELDR) to the Commission

(13 June 2003)

Subject:   Road transport managers

Is the Commission of the opinion that, in order to implement correctly Council Directive 96/26/EC (1) on admission to the occupation of road haulage operator and road passenger transport operator [etc.], a Member State must require road transport operators to employ a road transport manager, in the strict sense of the term (i.e. have an employer/employee relationship according to national law), as opposed to having a different contractual relationship (such as a contract for services with a self-employed manager) that meets all the requirements imposed by the Directive?

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(16 July 2003)

Article 3(1) of Council Directive 96/26/EC of 29 April 1996 on admission to the occupation of road haulage operator and road passenger transport operator and mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications intended to facilitate for these operators the right to freedom of establishment in national and international transport operations, stipulates that where a transport operator is a natural person but does not himself possess the required professional competence, he must have a designated transport manager, who satisfies the Directive's good repute and professional competence criteria and who continuously and effectively manages the transport operations. If the transport operator is not a natural person, the good repute criterion and professional competence criteria must still be satisfied by the transport manager, who again continuously and effectively manages the transport operations.

The Commission notes that in all cases the transport manager must be continuously and effectively managing the undertaking's transport operations. It is by this criterion that compliance with the Directive's requirements is to be judged. The Directive is however silent as to whether this can be achieved by directly employing a transport manager or by a different contractual arrangement and hence neither option is automatically excluded.

----

(1)OJ L 124, 23.5.1996, p. 1.

----
Nov. 27: Military airstrikes continue against ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq
 
  November 27, 2015
	Release # 20151127-01
	FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **SOUTHWEST ASIA****—** On Nov. 26, coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL 
terrorists in Syria and Iraq. In Iraq, coalition military forces 
conducted 18 strikes coordinated with and in support of the Government 
of Iraq using bomber, fighter, attack, ground attack and remotely 
piloted aircraft against ISIL targets.
	
	The following is a summary of the strikes conducted against ISIL since the last press release:**Iraq**
	* 
 Near Fallujah, two strikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed 
an ISIL rocket rail, an ISIL fighting position, an ISIL improvised 
explosive device (IED) cache, and an ISIL command and control node.
	
	* 
 Near Kisik, two strikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed two 
ISIL fighting positions and an ISIL heavy machine gun.
	
	*  Near 
Ramadi, seven strikes struck two separate ISIL tactical units and 
destroyed four ISIL buildings, two ISIL command and control nodes, an 
ISIL staging area, an ISIL heavy machine gun, an ISIL fighting position,
 seven ISIL boats, an ISIL bed-down location, an ISIL out post, cratered
 an ISIL used road, and denied ISIL access to terrain.
	
	*  Near 
Sinjar, five strikes struck three separate ISIL tactical units and 
destroyed an ISIL vehicle, an ISIL fighting position, and suppressed an 
ISIL rocket position.
	
	*  Near Sultan Abdallah, one strike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL fighting position.
	*  Near Tal Afar, one strike struck an ISIL vehicle borne IED facility.
	Strike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely.
	A
 strike, as defined in the CJTF releases, means one or more kinetic 
events that occur in roughly the same geographic location to produce a 
single, sometimes cumulative effect for that location.  So having a 
single aircraft deliver a single weapon against a lone ISIL vehicle is 
one strike, but so is multiple aircraft delivering dozens of weapons 
against a group of buildings and vehicles and weapon systems in a 
compound, for example, having the cumulative effect of making that 
facility (or facilities) harder or impossible to use.  Accordingly, 
CJTF-OIR does not report the number or type of aircraft employed in a 
strike, the number of munitions dropped in each strike, or the number of
 individual munition impact points against a target.
	
	The strikes 
were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to 
eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, 
Syria, and the wider international community.
	
	The destruction of 
ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the group's ability to 
project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have 
conducted strikes in Iraq include Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, 
France, Jordan, Netherlands, United Kingdom, and the United States. 
Coalition nations which have conducted strikes in Syria include 
Australia, Bahrain, Canada, France, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, United
 Arab Emirates, and the U.S.
## FILED Feb 04, 2022 02:12 PM(ET) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OFWORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT CHATTANOOGA Meagan Mueller-Rice, ) Docket No.: 2017-01-0750 ) Employee,
v. MEDATAG, Inc. d/b/a Poblanos Mexican Cuisine, ) State File No.: 82287-2017 ) ) Judge Audrey Headrick Uninsured Employer. )

COMPENSATION ORDER

The Courtheld a CompensationHearing onMs. Mueller-Rice's claimto determine whether she is entitledto medical, temporary disability, andpermanent disability benefits. The employer, Poblanos, didnot attendthe hearing. After consideringthe proof, the Court holds Ms. Mueller-Rice is entitled to medical and temporary disability benefits but not permanent disability benefits. History ofClaim

Ms. Mueller-Rice, a Tennessee resident, injured her left knee on September 30, 2017, when shetripped overa dog leashwhile serving customers. 1 Shereportedherinjury to Sabrina Holbrook, the manager on duty. Because her leg was bleeding and swelling, Ms. Mueller-Rice left work to seek emergency treatment. The providertookher offwork for four days, gave her a leg immobilizer and crutches, and referred her to Dr. Thomas Brown, III, an orthopedic surgeon.
Before seeing Dr. Brown, Ms. Mueller-Rice texted Ms. Holbrook and asked her to file a claim and provide the carrier's contact information. Instead, Ms. Holbrook referred Ms. Mueller-Rice to Irma Hyde, a Poblanos shareholder. Ms. Hyde failed to provide the requested information and advised that Ms. Mueller-Rice did not work enough hours to qualify for workers' compensation benefits. After that exchange, Ms. Mueller-Rice returned to the emergency room on October 9 and was taken offwork until seen by an orthopedist.

1Poblanos, a restaurant, allowed dogs onthe premises.
-----Original Message-----

From: Sue Felshin [mailto:sfelshin@csail.mit.edu] 

Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 8:44 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Cc: Sue Felshin (a)

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32 - retirement investment fiduciary duty rule

Dear Labor Department,

Please implement a strong rule requiring fiduciary duty for retirement investment advisors. Opponents 

of the rule say it will reduce choice. Sure -- it'll reduce retirees' "choice" to get ripped off by being 

steered into investments that are expensive for them and lucrative for their advisors. We current and 

future retirees need protection for our investments, for our own sakes and so that we don't become a 

burden on society. Please implement a strong fiduciary duty rule. Thank you.

Regards,

Sue Felshin

Concord, Massachusetts

sfelshin@alum.mit.edu