alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 533 

Welcoming Madame Chen Wu Sue-jen, the first lady of Taiwan, to 

Washington, D.C. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 

Mr. GILMAN (for himself, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. ROHRABACHER, and Mr. 

FALEOMAVAEGA) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Welcoming Madame Chen Wu Sue-jen, the first lady of 

Taiwan, to Washington, D.C. 

Whereas Taiwan’s First Lady Chen Wu Sue-jen, wife and political partner to her husband President Chen Shui-bian, 

has been unwaveringly and courageously striving for justice, human rights, and democracy in Taiwan and has 

herself held a seat in the Legislative Yuan; 

Whereas Taiwan is now a model vibrant democracy and one 

of the top ten trading partners of the United States; 

Whereas supporting democracy, human rights, and free market economies has been a longstanding policy of the 

United States; 

Whereas the Government and people in Taiwan have consistently provided tremendous support and generous conVerDate Aug 31 2005 00:08 Aug 23, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\PICKUP\HR533.IH HR533

bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 533 IH 

tributions to the United States after the terrorist attacks 

against the United States that occurred on September 

11, 2001; 

Whereas First Lady Chen Wu was one of the main forces behind Taiwan’s charity and humanitarian assistance for 

the victims of the terrorist attacks; 

Whereas First Lady Chen Wu will visit the United States beginning on September 22, 2002, and will bring with her 

a strong message from her husband and the people of 

Taiwan that Taiwan’s cooperation with the United States 

in this joint anti-terrorism campaign will continue and be 

further strengthened; 

Whereas First Lady Chen Wu, on behalf of President Chen 

Shui-bian, visited France in November 2001 to receive 

the International Human Rights Award; and 

Whereas First Lady Chen Wu, confined to a wheelchair due 

to a tragic traffic accident during a political campaign, 

is a strong and effective advocate for Taiwan’s physically 

challenged citizens: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives extends 

2 its warmest welcome to Taiwan’s First Lady Chen Wu 

3 Sue-jen during her visit to Washington, D.C., in Sep4 tember 2002. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
**
**Guide to Review Commission Procedures**

**Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission**

**November 1997**

**Table of Contents**

**Section 1 -- Introduction**
The Review CommissionPurposeRules of ProcedureParties May Represent ThemselvesTime is of the EssenceUsing This GuideSample Legal Documents            Questions Regarding Proper Procedure

**Section 2 -- Preserving Your Rights and Choosing a Legal Process**
OSHA CitationEmployer's Notice of ContestInformal Conference with OSHAContent and Effect of NoticeInforming Employees            Employees May Contest Abatement PeriodNotice of DocketingParty Requests for E-Z TrialChoosing E-Z Trial or Conventional Trial ProcessE-Z Trial Eliminates Paper Work

**Section 3 -- An Overview of Conventional Proceedings**
Employee NotificationThe ComplaintThe AnswerContesting the Abatement PeriodDiscoveryInterlocutory AppealsWithdrawal of Notice of Contest            SettlementHearingsHearing TranscriptsPost-hearing BriefsJudge's Decision and Petition for Discretionary ReviewSua Sponte Direction for ReviewDecisions Final in 30 Days

**Section 4 -- An Overview of E-Z Trial for Employers and Employees**
What is an E-Z Trial?Majors Features of E-Z TrialCases Eligible for E-Z TrialEmployee or Union RequestsSpecific Considerations for Employers            Complaint and AnswerBeginning E-Z TrialNotifying Other PartiesObjections to E-Z TrialDiscontinuing E-Z TrialRestrictions on Obtaining Information and Flexibility Regarding EvidenceRequired Information Disclosures            Pre-hearing ConferenceMotionsHearingsReview of the Judge's Decision

**Section 5 -- Other Important Things To Know**
Appearances in Commission ProceduresPenaltiesCriminal ProsecutionPrivate (Ex Parte) DicussionsPetition for Modification of Abatement            Expedited ProceedingsMaintaining Copies of Papers Filed with the Judge

**Descriptive Tables on Commission Processes**
Conventional ProcessE-Z Trial ProcessCommission Review of Judge's Decision

**Glossary**

**Appendixes/Sample Legal Documents**
Notices of ContestComplaint and Certificate of ServiceAnswerNotice of DecisionPetition for Discretionary ReviewDirection for Review            Notice of Withdrawal

Last           Updated:           March 27, 2003

Home | About OSHRC | Procedural Rules | Decisions | Strategic Plan | Budget | PublicationsPress Releases | FOIA | Related Websites | Disclaimer | OSH Act | Job Opportunities | Info Quality
**
#### § 6.29 Settlement.

The applicant and agency counsel may agree on a proposed settlement of the award before final action on the application, either in connection with a settlement of the underlying proceeding, or after the underlying proceeding has been concluded, in accordance with the agency's standard settlement procedure. If a prevailing party and the agency counsel agree on a proposed settlement of an award before an application has been filed the application shall be filed with the proposed settlement.
# Ground offensive begins for Operation Roundup, phase three

/ Published Sept. 11, 2018

September 11, 2018

Release # 20180911-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**SOUTHWEST ASIA –** Syrian Democratic Forces initiated ground operations for phase three of Operation Roundup on September 10.

The ground offensive, supported by Coalition cross-border air and artillery strikes, will clear ISIS remnants from northeastern Syria, along the Middle Euphrates River Valley toward the Syria-Iraq border.

Operation Roundup began May 1, 2018. Phase one successfully cleared ISIS near Baghuz in northeastern Syria May 15. Phase two cleared ISIS from Dashisha, Syria July 20. Shaping operations for phase three began Aug. 4, and ground operations will clear ISIS remnants from Hajin and the remaining Dayr Az Zawr countryside east of the Euphrates River.

Syrian Democratic Forces have proven themselves reliable, effective combat soldiers who abide by the law of armed conflict.

“We will continue to support our SDF partners in our shared fight against ISIS in Syria, and we thank the SDF for the incredible contribution and sacrifices they have made on behalf of the international community,” said Maj. Gen. Patrick Roberson, commander of the Special Operations Joint Task Force - Operation Inherent Resolve.

SDF operations, with Coalition support, have been instrumental in defeating ISIS and liberating millions of Syrians from brutal terrorist rule. The removal of ISIS from the battlefield has also thwarted the terrorist organization’s ability to recruit, train, equip, finance, inspire, plan and execute attacks throughout the region and the rest of the world.

“The multi-ethnic Syrian Democratic Forces remain committed to liberating the people of northeastern Syria from ISIS’s control and putting an end to the human suffering in the area,” said Roberson. “Moving forward, we will continue coordination with the SDF and other partners to promote regional security and stability that will ensure a lasting defeat of ISIS.”

Combined Joint Task Force - Operation Inherent Resolve remains committed to defeating ISIS in designated parts of Iraq and Syria, and to helping set conditions for follow-on operations to increase regional stability.

-30-
#### § 630.5 Failure to report data.

Failure to report data in accordance with this part may result in the noncompliant reporting entity being ineligible to receive any funding under 49 U.S.C. chapter 53, directly or indirectly, until such time as a report is filed in accordance with this part.

[81 FR 48970, July 26, 2016]
IV 

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 549

Expressing appreciation for the Prime Minister of Great Britain for his 

loyal support and leadership in the war on terrorism and reaffirming 

the strong relationship between the people of the United States and 

Great Britain. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2002

Mr. GRAVES submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION

Expressing appreciation for the Prime Minister of Great 

Britain for his loyal support and leadership in the war 

on terrorism and reaffirming the strong relationship between the people of the United States and Great Britain.

Whereas the people of the United States and Great Britain 

have a history of shared values and mutual respect for 

one another; 

Whereas the Governments of the United States and Great 

Britain are close allies and share a deep and abiding 

friendship based on a shared commitment to democratic 

values; 
2

•HRES 549 IH 

Whereas the United States and Great Britain understand the 

commitment to defend freedom and democracy regardless 

of the costs involved; 

Whereas British Prime Minister Tony Blair has displayed exceptional leadership in the war on terrorism; and 

Whereas the United States and Great Britain have been provoked into a war on terrorism that threatens the security 

of both nations: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) expresses sincere appreciation for Prime 

3 Minister Tony Blair for his leadership in the war on 

4 terrorism; 

5 (2) expresses its deepest sympathy to British 

6 victims of terrorism and their families, including the 

7 67 British citizens who were victims of the terrorist 

8 attack on September 11, 2001; 

9 (3) commends the efforts of British intelligence 

10 and defense agencies for their continued efforts in 

11 the war on terrorism; and 

12 (4) reaffirms the strong and special relationship 

13 between the people of the United States and Great 

14 Britain.

Æ
#### § 585.132 Response to inquiries.

At any time, each manufacturer shall, upon request from the Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, provide information identifying the vehicles (by make, model and vehicle identification number) that have been certified as complying with the requirements of Standard No. 141, Minimum Sound Requirements for Hybrid and Electric Vehicles (49 CFR 571.141). The manufacturer's designation of a vehicle as a certified vehicle is irrevocable.

[85 FR 54281, Sept. 1, 2020]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Thursday, September 14, 1995 (115), Para 115.6 Order of Business--Vacate Proceedings--H.R. 2126]
[Page 1343]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.115.6  order of business--vacate proceedings--h.r. 2126

  On motion of Mr. YOUNG of Florida, by unanimous consent,
  Ordered, That the proceedings of September 13, 1995, in which the 
House disagreed to the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 2126) making 
appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 1996, and for other purposes, and agreed to the conference 
requested by the Senate be vacated; Provided, that the order of the 
House of the same day enabling closed meetings of the conference remain 
in effect.
```
**Exhibit 24.17**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

**KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS** that I, **Sue L. Gin**do hereby appoint Frank M. Clarkand Darryl M. Bradford, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2008 of Commonwealth Edison Company, together with any amendments thereto, to befiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present. 

**Sue L. Gin**

**DATE: February 4, 2009**
April 25: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL in Syria and Iraq
 By CJTF - Operation Inherent Resolve News Release
  April 25, 2015 Release # 20150425FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **SOUTHWEST ASIA -**
 Coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria 
and Iraq between 8 a.m., April 24, and 8 a.m., April 25, local time.  In
 Syria, Coalition military forces conducted seven airstrikes using 
fighter and attack aircraft.  Separately in Iraq, Coalition military 
forces conducted 16 airstrikes approved by the Iraqi Ministry of Defense
 using fighter, attack and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL 
terrorists. "Coalition support remains steadfast as we work 
together with our partners to defeat Daesh," said Brig. Gen. Thomas 
Weidley, CJTF-OIR Chief of Staff. "These strikes support continuous 
incremental gains by Iraqi and Kurdish fighters that will combine over 
time to result in the demise of Daesh in Iraq and Syria." The following is a summary of the strikes conducted since the last press release: **Syria** * Near Al Hasakah, three airstrikes struck an ISIL fighting position, destroying an ISIL IED cache and an ISIL mortar position. * Near Kobani, four airstrikes struck four ISIL tactical units, destroying two ISIL boats. **Iraq** *
 Near Bayji, seven airstrikes struck four ISIL tactical units and an 
ISIL staging area, destroying four ISIL fighting positions, three ISIL 
vehicles, an ISIL VBIED and an ISIL warehouse. * Near Fallujah, four airstrikes struck four ISIL tactical units, destroying four ISIL vehicles and an ISIL heavy machine gun. * Near Kirkuk, an airstrike struck multiple ISIL fighting positions. * Near Mosul, an airstrike struck an ISIL armored vehicle. * Near Ramadi, an airstrike struck an ISIL large tactical unit, destroying two ISIL structures. * Near Sinjar, two airstrikes destroyed an ISIL fighting position and an ISIL engineer vehicle. Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely. The
 strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the 
operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose
 to Iraq, Syria, the region, and the wider international community. The 
destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the 
terrorist group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. 
Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Iraq include 
Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, Netherlands, United
 Kingdom and United States. Coalition nations which have conducted 
airstrikes in Syria include Bahrain, Canada, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, 
United Arab Emirates and U.S.
§ 79.1 Scope. ( a ) This part implements 49 U.S.C. 80504, which authorizes the President of the United States to award a bronze medal for bravery to any person who, by extreme daring, risks his/her life in trying to prevent, or to save the life of a person in, a grave accident/incident in the United States that involves an interstate rail carrier or a motor vehicle being operated on public highways.
( b ) The actions for which the medal may be awarded must reflect such unusual daring and bravery that a person would not normally be expected to perform them as a regular part of his/her regular work or vocation.
From: Linda [mailto:lstirling4@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 3:30 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Department of Labor: Public Comment for RIN-1210-AB30

I heartily support the proposed amendments to the disability ERISA laws: RIN-1210-AB30. The 

current rules have worked against the disabled in this country who have dutifully paid for many 

years into their private long term disability insurance. Denials for the flimsiest of reasons, or no 

reason at all, are the industry norm. It’s obvious to see that the ERISA laws are stacked against 

the disabled. The amendments will greatly assist the disabled in obtaining their deserved 

disability payments as promised by their LTD companies.

Sincerely yours,

L Stirling
----

(2004/C 84 E/0626)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0205/04

by Mario Borghezio (NI) to the Commission

(29 January 2004)

Subject:   Protecting SMEs against multinationals: the case of Ford dealers in Italy

The commercial policy pursued in recent years by the company Ford Italia, centring on the ‘mopping-up’ of leading car dealers and their concentration under the direct control of figurehead companies, has created great difficulties for the old dealers, with dozens of SMEs deliberately being eliminated from the market.

Does the Commission not consider this abusive conduct of the multinational Ford in respect of its dealers to restrict the freedom to compete of SMEs operating in the automotive trade market, and therefore also to occasion prejudice to the more general interests of the consumer, by creating a situation where there is unfair competition from companies only ‘autonomous’ of the mother company in appearance?

Answer given by Mr Monti on behalf of the Commission

(15 March 2004)

Like other suppliers, car manufacturers are generally free to distribute their products as they see fit, providing that their distribution system does not infringe Article 81 or 82 of the EC Treaty. They may therefore choose to distribute their products through their own outlets, or through car dealers that are commercially independent.

Ford currently operates a quantitative selective distribution system in Italy. Quantitative selection allows the car manufacturer to reduce the number of dealers in its network, so long as the contractual notice periods are respected. As Commission Regulation 1400/2002 (1) makes plain, such a system is permissible under Article 81 of the EC Treaty, provided that the agreements in question contain none of the serious restrictions of competition set out in Article 4 of the said regulation, and provided that the conditions set out in Articles 3 and 5 are met.

Ford's decision to exclude certain dealers from its network and to move towards a more vertically-integrated distribution structure is also unlikely to infringe Article 82 of the EC Treaty, since Ford can not be said to be in a dominant position on the Italian market.

As far as takeover activity is concerned, the Honourable Member should note that the dealer sector in Europe is highly fragmented, and levels of concentration are generally insufficient for the Community merger rules to be called into play.

It would therefore appear that the Commission has no grounds to take any action in respect of Ford's move to consolidate its Italian distribution network.

----

(1)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 1400/2002 of 31 July 2002 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices in the motor vehicle sector, OJ L 203, 1.8.2002.

----
# CJTF-OIR Completes Civilian Casualty Investigation

/ Published May 21, 2015

May 21, 2015Release # 20150506FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Lt. Gen. James L. Terry, Combined Joint Task Force – Operation Inherent Resolve commander, has reviewed and approved the findings and recommendations of an investigation that he directed into allegations that U.S. airstrikes against a network of veteran al Qa’ida operatives, sometimes called “Khorasan Group” Nov. 5-6, 2014, in the vicinity of Harim City, Syria, likely resulted in non-combatant casualties.

The preponderance of the evidence in the investigation indicates the airstrikes conducted against facilities used by Khorasan Group in the vicinity of Harim City, Syria, likely led to the deaths of two non-combatant children. Terry directed the investigation on Jan. 8, 2015 and approved the findings of the investigation on April 5, 2015.

The redacted investigation has been released and is available at USCENTCOM’s Freedom of Information Act Reading Room at http://tinyurl.com/USCENTCOM-CIVCAS-INVESTIGATION. 

Prior to the strikes, the Department of Defense conducted a thorough assessment, review, and validation process of the targeted buildings, and assessed that the Khorasan Group was using them exclusively for military purposes.  In that assessment process, there was no indication that there were children at any of the targeted buildings. The strikes also resulted in minor injuries to two adult non-combatants residing near one of the targets. 

The investigation concluded that the Nov. 5-6 airstrikes in the vicinity of Harim City, Syria, resulted in the destruction of the Khorasan Group targets. All ordnance functioned properly and struck their intended targets accurately. This triggered secondary explosions.  

The airstrikes were conducted in accordance with applicable military authorizations, targeting guidance, and applicable rules of engagement. The targets engaged were valid military targets, and the Law of Armed Conflict principles of military necessity, humanity, proportionality, and distinction were adhered to during the targeting and engagement process. Measures were taken to avoid unintended death or injury of non-combatants during the strike by reviewing the targets thoroughly prior to engagement, relying on accurate assessments of the targets, and engaging the targets when the risk to non-combatants was minimized.
“We regret the unintentional loss of lives,” Terry said. “The Coalition continues to take all reasonable measures during the targeting process to mitigate risks to non-combatants, and to comply with the principles of the Law of Armed Conflict.”
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 493

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 664) to amend title II of

the Social Security Act to provide that the reductions in Social Security

benefits which are required in the case of spouses and surviving spouses

who are also receiving certain Government pensions shall be equal to

the amount by which the total amount of the combined monthly benefit

(before reduction) and monthly pension exceeds $1,200.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 18, 2002

Mr. JEFFERSON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 664) to amend

title II of the Social Security Act to provide that the

reductions in Social Security benefits which are required

in the case of spouses and surviving spouses who are

also receiving certain Government pensions shall be equal

to the amount by which the total amount of the combined monthly benefit (before reduction) and monthly

pension exceeds $1,200.

1 Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this

2 resolution the House shall without intervention of any

3 point of order consider in the House the bill (H.R. 664)

4 to amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide that
2

•HRES 493 IH

1 the reductions in Social Security benefits which are re2 quired in the case of spouses and surviving spouses who

3 are also receiving certain Government pensions shall be

4 equal to the amount by which the total amount of the com5 bined monthly benefit (before reduction) and monthly pen6 sion exceeds $1,200. The first reading of the bill shall be

7 dispensed with. After general debate, which shall be con8 fined to the bill and shall not exceed 2 hours, to be equally

9 divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking mi10 nority member of the Committee on Ways and Means, the

11 bill shall be considered for amendment under the five12 minute rule. No amendment shall be in order except an

13 amendment by and if offered by Mr. Jefferson of Lou14 isiana, or his designee, and shall be debatable for not to

15 exceed one hour, equally divided and controlled by the pro16 ponent and a Member opposed thereto. Such amendment

17 shall not be subject to an amendment and shall not be

18 subject to a division of the question in the House or in

19 the Committee of the Whole. At the conclusion of consider20 ation of the bill for amendment, the Committee shall rise

21 and report the bill to the House with such amendments

22 as may have been adopted. The previous question shall

23 be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments
3

•HRES 493 IH

1 thereto to final passage without intervening motion, except

2 one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Æ