alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 22 April 2004

in Case T-343/02: Roland Schintgen v Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Officials - Staff Committee of the Commission in Luxembourg - Elections to the Luxembourg Staff Committee - Electoral system - Principles of fairness and democracy)

(2004/C 118/82)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-343/02: Roland Schintgen, a Commission official residing in Keispelt (Luxembourg), represented by L. Vogel, lawyer, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J. Currall and V. Joris) – application for annulment of the decision of the appointing authority, dated 16 July 2002 and notified to the applicant on 6 August 2002, rejecting the applicant's complaint of 28 February 2002, by which, in essence, he applied for annulment of the elections to the local staff committee of the Commission in Luxembourg which took place in November 2001 and of the appointment of those elected to that committee and the Commission's failure to annul those elections – the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of J. Azizi, President, and M. Jaeger and F. Dehousse, Judges; D. Christensen (Administrator), Registrar, has given a judgment on 22 April 2004, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 19 of 25.1.2003.

----
From: John Schrup [mailto:john@cprmycareer.com] 

Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 3:30 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Proposed DOL Fiduciary Rule

To Whom It May Concern: I am the owner of CPR My Career, LLC, a recruiting, career 

coaching and financial planning firm. We provide exceptional value added services to 

dislocated workers- we recruit for them, we provide career coaching, and we provide financial 

planning for those who request help with their retirement assets. The proposed DOL Fiduciary 

Rule would cause our company to no longer exist. We have 50 full time employees. The 

proposed rule would eliminate 85% of our revenue overnight. I have invested my life savings 

into this business and work hard every day to do the right thing for our consumer. Our services 

are free to the dislocated worker and are considered best in class. I would love to share more 

information to anyone regarding how this proposed rule will destroy what has taken me 20+ 

years to create. If you would like more information, reply to this email or call me on my cell at 

612-310-0500.

Sincerely,

John

John Schrup

President

CPR My Career

952-479-6331

john@cprmycareer.com
February 10, 2013

Lauralyn Remo DOT, Office of Aviation Analysis Air Carrier Fitness Division, X-56

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, DC 20590

Dear Ms. Remo;

Change comes slowly to rural Alaska. It requires a great deal of planning, money, and hard work. Above 

all, it requires a person who has a vision and will dedicate hours of his life to make change happen. 

Amazingly, change has happened on Prince of Wales Island. Island Air Express has propelled this island's 

residents into the world of modern aviation! Now we can fly IFR safely, faster, more comfortably, after 

dark, above the clouds; we can take off from the Klawock Airport and land at the Ketchikan Airport on 

wheels, not floats.

For more than my fifty years in Alaska VFR floatplanes have provided the mail service to this island. They 

did what they could. But modern technology has made possible a much more reliable mail service to an 

island with weather like ours. Island Air Express can provide this mail service because they have the 

aircraft, technology, facilities, and personnel to do it.

After three years of operation from the only airport on the island, Island Air Express has proven it's a 

quality operation. It's based here on the island with us. Now we want our mail service to equal the

passenger service we have been enjoying. We see how modern aviation could improve our mail service. 

I hope you will help us move forward with Island Air Express and leave the VFR floatplane service to 

history. Thank you.

Sincerely yours,

Margaret Douglass

Craig, Alaska
#### § 821.16 Interlocutory appeals from law judges' rulings on motions.

Rulings of law judges on motions which are not dispositive of the proceeding as a whole may not be appealed to the Board prior to its consideration of the entire proceeding, except in extraordinary circumstances and with the consent of the law judge who made the ruling. Interlocutory appeals shall be disallowed unless the law judge finds, either orally on the record or in writing, that to allow such an appeal is necessary to prevent substantial detriment to the public interest or undue prejudice to a party. If an interlocutory appeal is allowed, any party may file a brief with the Board within such time as the law judge directs. No oral argument will be heard unless the Board directs otherwise.
October 1, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KISH DANO POWELL, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00653-CV V.

MONICA POWELL, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on June 10, 2013. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Kish Dano Powell.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
EXHIBIT 31.2
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

     I,  Claude  Couty,  certify  that:

       1.     I  have  reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Heritage
Worldwide,  Inc.

       2.     Based  on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue  statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to  make  the  statements  made,  in light of the circumstances under which such
statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly  report;

       3.     Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other
financial  information  included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material  respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of  the  registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the periods presented in this quarterly
report;

       4.     The  registrant's  other certifying officers and I are responsible
for  establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in  Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for  the  registrant  and  have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is  made  know  to  us  by others within those entities, particularly during the
period  in  which  this  quarterly  report  is  being  prepared;

     b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures  and  presented  in  this  quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness  of  the  disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  our  evaluation.

     c)  Disclosed  in this quarterly report any change in the issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this
quarterly  report  that  has  materially  affected,  or  is reasonably likely to
materially  affect,  the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

       5.     The  registrant's  other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based  on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee  of  registrant's  board  of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the
equivalent  functions):

     a)  All  significant  deficiencies  in  the design or operation of internal
controls  which  are  reasonably  likely  to  adversely  affect the registrant's
ability  to  record,  process,  summarize  and report financial information; and

     b)  Any  fraud,  whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial  reporting

     Date:  March  19,  2004                         /s/  Claude  Couty
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Principal Financial Officer


                                       18
<PAGE>
Title: Active tectonics of the Devils Mountain fault and related structures, northern Puget

Lowland and eastern Strait of Juan de Fuca region, Pacific northwestAuthor(s): Johnson, S.Y., Dadisman, S.V., Mosher, D.C., Blakely, R.J., and Childs, J.R.Publishing Organization: U.S. Geological SurveyPublication Series and Number: Professional Paper 1643Publication Date: 2001Map Scale: 1:310,000Cross Section: YesNorthernmost Latitude: 48°30' 0"N (48.5000)Southernmost Latitude: 48°13'12"N (48.2200)Easternmost Longitude: 122°19'12"W (-122.3200)Westernmost Longitude: 123°20'42"W (-123.3450)ISBN: 0607974575Publication Format: Digital and PaperOnline:

View the publication

 View high-resolution images: (Option 1 = ExpressView plug-in for Windows required. Option 2 = no plug-in

needed.) [1] [2] Plate 1: Maps showing Tracklines, and U.S. Geological . . .

 [1] [2] Plate 2: U.S. Geological Survey, Geological Survey of . . .This Product Is Available, Please note thepublication series and number, and thencontact: U.S. Geological Survey

Postal Address:USGS Information ServicesBox 25286Denver, CO 80225

Voice Telephone: (303) 202-4700 or 1-888-ASK-USGSFacsimile Telephone: (303) 202-4693

Product Description Page http://n1 of 2 
If any fields in this record

contain errors, please send us

your

Has this record

been

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, USAURL http://ngmdb.usgs.gov/ngmdb/ngm_catalog.ora.htmlDatabase project personnel.Last modified: 28-Nov-2011

Product Description Page http://n2 of 2
COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Exhibit 23.1 – Consent of Kirkland, Russ, Murphy & Tapp P.A.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements(Forms S-8 No. 333-108561, No. 333-44437 and No. 333-15929) of our report datedJuly 30, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofComprehensive Care Corporation and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the year ended May 31, 2004.
/s/ Kirkland, Russ, Murphy & Tapp P.A.
-----Original Message----- 

From: 9196195584@vzwpix.com [mailto:9196195584@vzwpix.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 4:36 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: 

RIN 1210-ab33. Please keep your hands off our 401K & SEP IRA money. 

China & others don't want our debt so you are trying to sell the crap 

to us. 

This message was sent using the Picture and Video Messaging service 

from Verizon Wireless! 

To learn how you can snap pictures and capture videos with your 

wireless phone visit www.verizonwireless.com/picture. 

Note: To play video messages sent to email, QuickTime 6.5 or higher is 

required.
EXHIBIT 10.31

                AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT JULY 1, 1998

To:  Don Berryessa
       6008 Ashley Court, Pleasanton  CA  94588

Dear Don:

This letter serves as an amendment to the Employment Agreement dated 
March 4, 1997.  The changes below are effective July 1, 1998.

The terms of the March 4, 1997 Employment Agreement are amended as 
follows:

1.  EMPLOYMENT AS SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF OPERATIONS
     OFFICER.  The Company does hereby employ Executive as Senior Vice 
               President and Chief Operations Officer of the Company. 

3.  COMPENSATION        
      3.1 Base Salary - The annual base salary shall be $105,000.00 per 
year.

3.2 Bonus 

3.2.3   Options to purchase an additional Fifteen Thousand 
(15,000) shares of common stock of the Company exercisable at the 
end of each 12 month period beginning  July 1, 1998, at $6.5625 
per share, subject to compliance with applicable laws.

The remaining terms and conditions as outlined in the original 
Employment Agreement continue to be in effect.

In Witness Whereof, the Company has caused this Agreement to be executed 
by its respective duly authorized officer, and the Executive has 
hereunto signed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

Company:
AMERICAN CHAMPION ENTERTAINMENT, INC.


By:     /s/ Anthony K. Chan             
      Anthony K. Chan, President & CEO

Accepted:


By:     /s/ Don Berryessa                            Date:   July 1, 1998    
            Don Berryessa

<PAGE>
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1

99–011 2002

107th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 107–216

2002 COMPREHENSIVE REPORT ON U.S. TRADE AND

INVESTMENT POLICY TOWARD SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA

MESSAGE

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

TRANSMITTING

THE 2002 COMPREHENSIVE REPORT ON U.S. TRADE AND INVESTMENT POLICY TOWARD SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AFRICAN GROWTH AND OPPORTUNITY ACT

MAY 20, 2002.—Message and accompanying papers referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means and ordered to be printed

(1)

To the Congress of the United States:

As required by section 106 of title I of the Trade and Development Act of 2000 (Public Law 106–200), I am providing a report

prepared by my Administration entitled, the 2002 Comprehensive

Report on U.S. Trade and Investment Policy Toward Sub-Saharan

Africa and Implementation of the African Growth and Opportunity

Act.

GEORGE W. BUSH.

THE WHITE HOUSE, May 20, 2002.

(3)

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

118

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

145

146

147
1210-AB32-2-1633.html[7/26/2015 9:21:34 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jy0-ig6j

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2130

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Every time the government sticks its hand into the citizens business it ends up destroying the freedoms we have

 left. Keep the government's nose out of our retirement! The individual can make better choices than the

 government
CLP SNOWE MANS: MNOS HER bY ¢0bL
Wnited States Senate

MICHAEL ENZi WYOMING CommITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS & ENTREPRENEURSHIP

JEANNE SHAHEEN, NEW HAMPSHIRE JERRY MORAN, KANSAS WasuincTon, DC 20510-6350
KAY HAGAN, NORTH CAROLINA

CARL LEVIN, MICHIGAN
TOM HARKIN, IOWA

TELEPHONE: (202) 224-5175 Fax: (202) 224-5619

DONALD R. CRAVINS, DEMOCRATIC STAFF DIRECTOR AND CHIEF COUNSEL
WALLACE K. HSUEH, REPUBLICAN STAFF DIRECTOR

June 2, 2011

The Honorable Hilda L. Solis ~~ ofA
Secretary ~
Department of Labor >
200 Constitution Avenue, NW

Room S-2018

Washington, DC 20210

Dear Secretary Solis,

As Chairwoman of the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, I am
contacting the Department regarding the proposed rule expanding the definition of fiduciary for
purposes of Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).
Specifically, I am concerned that the rule, as proposed, lacks transparency and accountability
with regard to its economic impact on small business owners. The proposed rule also appears to
be unduly burdensome to small firms that provide advisory services to retirement plans and
IRAs.

During the Committee’s March 31 hearing on the Administration’s 2012 Small Business
Administration budget request, I reaffirmed our commitment to eliminating regulatory burdens
that disproportionately impact small businesses. While I understand the need to expand the
current definition of fiduciary, the Department has failed to properly consider the economic
impact of the rule on investment advice firms that service small retirement plans and IRA
accounts. Furthermore, I am concerned that small plan sponsors will be unable to absorb the
significantly increased costs for plan investment advice that will follow the new rule.

At a time when many small businesses owners are struggling to provide for a secure retirement
for their employees, the Department's fiduciary proposal could severely limit access to cost-
effective retirement plan investment advice. Given that half of all private sector employees are
employed by small businesses, the Department should adopt policies that expand access to
retirement planning services for small businesses that voluntarily chose to sponsor retirement
plans. Unfortunately, I fear this proposal would have the opposite effect, disadvantaging small
businesses and small investment advisors that have limited compliance resources.

As a result, I strongly urge the Department to conduct a thorough review of the proposed
regulation and its impact on small businesses that sponsor employee retirement plans or offer


The Honorable Hilda L. Solis
June 2, 2011
Page 2

retirement plan advisory services. The Department should also solicit comments from small
business owners and plan sponsors on the compliance burdens associated with the proposed rule.

I want to underscore my sincere concerns about the impact of this proposed rule on small
businesses in Louisiana and nationwide. The regulation should not be finalized until these
concerns have been thoroughly studied and reviewed.

7 Xx. Xo
Mary L. Landrieu

United States Senator
# Operation Inherent Resolve Casualty

/ Published April 29, 2017
April 29, 201720170429-02**SOUTHWEST ASIA —**Apr. 29, 2017
It is CJTF-OIR policy to defer casualty identification procedures to the relevant national authorities.
Independent Auditors' Report


The Board of Directors and Shareholders
QVC, Inc.:

We have audited the  accompanying  consolidated  balance  sheet of QVC, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998, and the related consolidated statements of
operations and  comprehensive  income,  shareholders'  equity and cash flows for
each of the  years  in the  two-year  period  ended  December  31,  1998.  These
consolidated  financial  statements  are  the  responsibility  of the  Company's
management.  Our  responsibility is to express an opinion on these  consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.

We  conducted  our  audits  in  accordance  with  generally   accepted  auditing
standards.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes
assessing the  accounting  principles  used and  significant  estimates  made by
management,  as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated  financial statements referred to above present
fairly,  in all  material  respects,  the  financial  position of QVC,  Inc. and
subsidiaries  as of December 31, 1998,  and the results of their  operations and
their cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31,
1998, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 3, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,395,554
<ALLOWANCES>                                   861,237
<INVENTORY>                                    977,238
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,676,733
<PP&E>                                       1,491,799
<DEPRECIATION>                                 375,723
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,826,134
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,336,708
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,851,687
<OTHER-SE>                                 (11,369,260)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,826,134
<SALES>                                      1,706,698
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,706,698
<CGS>                                        1,475,435
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,475,435
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,998
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              44,663
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (876,308)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (877,108)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (877,108)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.16)


</TABLE>
1210-AB32-2-1520.html[7/26/2015 6:40:37 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwn-2mj6

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2017

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: C B

General Comment

Hello. I am writing on behalf of myself, my wife, and a great number of working Americans to ask that you do

 not interfere with (or try to "help", "regulate", etc.) the way that our retirement investments are handled. There

 are far more people outside the government who are qualified to help us determine where and how to invest our

 hard-earned money than there are inside the government. We are wise enough to either know what we are doing

 in regards to our retirement or to find reputible guidance in this area. And, even if we were not, the government

 does not have the constitutional right to interfere with our pay as it is. Thank you for respecting our right to

 handle retirement savings ourselves.