alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,705                   2,705
<SECURITIES>                                     9,537                   9,537
<RECEIVABLES>                                  222,868                 222,868
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               235,110                 235,110
<PP&E>                                          12,967                  12,967
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (348)                   (348)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 247,729                 247,729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          210,929                 210,929
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,800                  36,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   247,729                 247,729
<SALES>                                         22,742                  45,298
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,742                  45,298
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,040                  16,633
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,702                  28,665
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,702                  28,665
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,702                  28,665
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 325

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 325 appear at 66 FR 49869, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 325.3 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000741612
<NAME> TNP ENTERPRISES

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      907,978
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      4,243
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          28,188
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        60,790
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,001,199
<COMMON>                                       196,685
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            130,425
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 327,110
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,664
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           340,244
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  100,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 232,181
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,001,199
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      576,150
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            19,120
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     482,638
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     501,758
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         74,392
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                (482)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  73,910
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        43,743
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,167
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        (19)
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   30,186
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        15,537
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       38,538
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          74,557
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.24


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 6115-016]

                    On August 3, 2023, Pyrites Hydro, LLC submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) a copy of its application for a Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) water quality certification filed with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (New York DEC), in conjunction with the above captioned project. Pursuant to 40 CFR 121.6 and section 4.34(b)(5) of the Commission's regulations,[1]                                          we hereby notify New York DEC of the following:                

Date of Receipt of the Certification Request: August 3, 2023.

Reasonable Period of Time to Act on the Certification Request: One year, August 3, 2024.

                    If New York DEC fails or refuses to act on the water quality certification request on or before the above date, then the                           ( print page 58264)                        agency certifying authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).                

Dated: August 21, 2023.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             18 CFR 4.34(b)(5).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2023-18393 Filed 8-24-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
EXHIBIT
      23.2




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
        333-53367 and 333-106079 on Form S-3 of our reports dated March 8, 2006 (which
        express an unqualified opinion and include explanatory paragraphs regarding
        the
        adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, *Accounting
        for Asset Retirement Obligations* ,
        effective January 1, 2003, and Financial
        Accounting Standards Board Financial Interpretation No. 47, *Accounting
        for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations* in 2005
        and the
        change in actuarial valuation measurement date for the pension plan and other
        post-retirement benefits from September 30 to December 31 during 2003), relating
        to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule
        of
        Public Service Company of New Mexico and management's report of the
        effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting appearing in this
        Annual Report on Form 10-K of Public Service Company of New Mexico for the
        year
        ended December 31, 2005.


/s/
      DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP




Philadelphia,
      Pennsylvania


March
      10,
      2006
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-6879, 33-51379, 333-99363 and
333-99363-01) and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-33847) of Commonwealth Edison Company and Subsidiary Companies of our report dated January 29, 2003, except for Note 19 for
which the date is March 17, 2003, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP

Chicago,
Illinois
March 21, 2003

---

QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 154 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 154

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United 
 States Postal Service should take all appropriate measures to ensure 
          the continuation of its 6-day mail delivery service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                 May 26 (legislative day, May 25), 2001

Mr. Davis of Illinois (for himself, Mr. McHugh, Mr. Burton of Indiana, 
 Mr. Waxman, Mr. Rush, Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, Mr. Kanjorski, Mr. 
Davis of Florida, Mr. Blagojevich, Mr. Brown of Ohio, Mr. George Miller 
 of California, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. Allen, and Mr. Blumenauer) submitted 
   the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United 
 States Postal Service should take all appropriate measures to ensure 
          the continuation of its 6-day mail delivery service.

Whereas the United States Postal Service has announced that, in order to offset 
        a projected budget shortfall, it may need to reduce the frequency of its 
        mail delivery service from 6 days to 5 days a week (by ending Saturday 
        delivery of mail);
Whereas 6-day mail delivery is an essential service that the American people 
        have relied on since 1912, particularly working families that depend on 
        the Postal Service for the timely delivery of their paychecks;
Whereas Social Security is the primary or sole source of income for many senior 
        citizens, and any delay in the delivery of their Social Security checks 
        would make it difficult for them to purchase even essential items such 
        as food and medicine; and
Whereas ending Saturday mail deliveries would inevitably cause not only delays 
        in the delivery of mail, but higher postal costs, due to the many hours 
        of additional overtime that the Postal Service would require in order to 
        handle the resulting backup of mail: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the United States Postal Service should take all appropriate measures 
to ensure the continuation of its 6-day mail delivery service.
                                 <all>
```
----

**EXHIBIT      32.3**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY        ACT OF 2002**

* *

|   | (1) | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                  and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   August                    14, 2007 | By:    | /s/Jeffry                    E. Sterba                  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                      |   | Jeffry                    E. Sterba                     |
|                                                      |   | Chairman,                    President and              |
|                                                      |   | Chief                    Executive Officer              |
|                                                      |   | Public                    Service Company of New Mexico |
1210-AB32-2-1229.html[7/24/2015 8:47:40 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvt-m3ev

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1724

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: E Bitney

General Comment

Re: RIN 1210-AB32

Why in the world are you opening this up for even more loopholes to allow misuse of public monies that are

 supposed to be for the public? This is not in the best interest of the public, why are you even considering this? If

 changed this will only create profit for everyone but the employees that you are supposed to be serving. So sad!!
From: Schuster, Glenn R SAJ [mailto:Glenn.R.Schuster@usace.army.mil] 

Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 10:51 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

My comment; keep your hands off of my retirement accounts. 

The government has screwed up social security and I do not want my hard earned retirement 

funds being manipulated and squandered by the same incompetent clowns that have done so 

poorly with SS funds.

Glenn R. Schuster, PE 904-232-3691 

5 % of people make things happen 65% of people let things happen 30% of people say "what happened?"
H. Res. 33

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 8, 2001.

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are

hereby, elected the following standing committees of the

House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS: Mr. Fattah of Pennsylvania and Mr. Rothman of New Jersey.

COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE: Mr. Larsen of Washington, Mr. Ross of Arkansas, and Mr. Acevedo-Vila ́ of Puerto Rico.

COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mrs. McCarthy of New

York, Mr. Moore of Kansas, Mr. Capuano of Massachusetts,

and Mr. Honda of California.

COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE: To

rank after Mr. Holt of New Jersey, Ms. Solis of California,

Mrs. Davis of California, and Ms. McCollum of Minnesota.

COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE: Mr. Doyle of

Pennsylvania, Mr. John of Louisiana, and Ms. Harman of

California.
2

•HRES 33 EH

COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES: Mr. Ford of Tennessee, Mr. Hinojosa of Texas, Mr. Lucas of Kentucky, Mr.

Shows of Mississippi, Mr. Crowley of New York, Mr. Clay of

Missouri, Mr. Israel of New York, and Mr. Ross of Arkansas.

COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM: Mr. Clay of

Missouri.

COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: Mr.

Blumenauer of Oregon, Ms. Berkley of Nevada, Mrs.

Napolitano of California, and Mr. Schiff of California.

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: Mr. Schiff of California.

COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES: Mr. Rahall of West Virginia, Mr. Markey of Massachusetts, Mr. Kildee of Michigan,

Mr. DeFazio of Oregon, Mr. Faleomavaega of American

Samoa, Mr. Abercrombie of Hawaii, Mr. Ortiz of Texas, Mr.

Pallone of New Jersey, Mr. Dooley of California, Mr. Underwood of Guam, Mr. Smith of Washington, Ms. Christensen

of the Virgin Islands, Mr. Kind of Wisconsin, Mr. Inslee of

Washington, Mrs. Napolitano of California, Mr. Udall of New

Mexico, Mr. Udall of Colorado, Mr. Holt of New Jersey, Mr.

McGovern of Massachusetts, Mr. Acevedo-Vila ́ of Puerto

Rico, Ms. Solis of California, Mr. Carson of Oklahoma, and

Ms. McCollum of Minnesota.

COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE: Mr. Matheson of Utah and

Mr. Israel of New York.
3

•HRES 33 EH

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Mr. Langevin of

Rhode Island.

Attest:

Clerk.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-31340 Summary Calendar

YORAM RAZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER SHREVEPORT; ROBERT JACKSON; LAWRENCE W. JOHNSON; AMIRA S. ASSI, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 01-CV-381

-------------------- September 6, 2002 Before JONES, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Yoram Raz, a pro se litigant, argues that the district court erred in granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss his complaint based on Raz’s failure to file his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint within the one-year statute of limitations. Raz argues that he did not have sufficient knowledge that the defendant doctors hadNo. 01-31340 -2- violated his constitutional rights during an October 1998 hospitalization until discovery was conducted in February 2001. Because there is no specified federal statute of limitations for 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suits, federal courts borrow the forum state’s general personal injury period. Owens v. Okure , 488 U.S. 235, 249-51 (1989). The applicable prescriptive period in Louisiana for personal injury claims is one year. Elzy v. Roberson , 868 F.2d 793, 794-95 (5th Cir. 1989). “Under federal law, a section 1983 action generally accrues when a plaintiff ‘knows or has reason to know of the injury which is the basis of the action.’” Harris v. Hegmann , 198 F.3d 153, 157 (5th Cir. 1999) (citation omitted)

. Raz’s allegations reflect that he was in possession of critical facts showing that the defendants had employed medical procedures which he deemed objectionable and abusive within one year of his hospitalization. Because Raz’s cause of action was clearly prescribed, the district court did not err in dismissing the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Raz has not challenged the district court’s dismissal of his claim under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Thus, he has abandoned that claim on appeal. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Raz has not shown that the district court erred in denying his motion to recuse the magistrate judge and the district courtNo. 01-31340 -3- judge from presiding in his case. He failed to show the judicial officers were biased against him because the officers dismissed his prior cases as frivolous; adverse rulings alone do not call into question a judge’s impartiality. See Liteky v. United
States , 510 U.S. 540, 555 (1994). The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Raz’s motion to file a second amended complaint. Such amendment would have been futile because it would have also been subject to dismissal based on the one-year statute of limitations. Raz’s appeal has no arguable merit. The appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             701
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,235
<ALLOWANCES>                                       402
<INVENTORY>                                      4,638
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,962
<PP&E>                                           8,594
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,416
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  57,447
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,860
<BONDS>                                         17,370
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,060
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,970
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    57,447
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               111,446
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   90,091
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,311
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,203
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,259
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,589
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,670
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,670
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46


</TABLE>