alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 168 (Thursday, August 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 50155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4261]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


National Small Business Development Center Advisory Board Public 
Meeting

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Appendix 2 of Title 
5, United States Code, Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that 
the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA), National Small Business 
Development Center (SBDC) Advisory Board, will be hosting a public 
federal meeting on Monday, September 17, 2007, from 3 p.m. to 4 p.m. 
The meeting will be held at the Hyatt Regency Colorado Convention 
Center, 650 15th Street, Denver, CO 80202. The purpose of the meeting 
is to discuss advisory board matters that may be presented by members 
and the staff of the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA).
    Anyone wishing to attend the National Small Business Development 
Center Advisory Board meeting must contact Alanna Falcone, Program 
Analyst, U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Small Business 
Development Centers, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416, 
telephone (202) 619-1612 or fax (202) 481-0134.

Matthew Teague,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-4261 Filed 8-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
Editorial Note on Part 572
Editorial Notes: 1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 572.76 Limbs assembly and test procedure. ( a ) *Limbs assembly.* The limbs consist of the assemblies designated as SA 106C 041, SA 106C 042, SA 106C 071, and SA 106C 072, on drawing No. SA 106C 001, sheet 2, and conform to each applicable drawing listed on SA 106C 001, sheets 14 through 17.
( b ) *Limbs assembly impact response requirement.* When each knee is impacted at 7.0 ±0.1 fps, according to paragraph (c) of this section, the maximum force on the femur shall not be more than 1060 pounds and not less than 780 pounds, with a duration above 400 pounds of not less than 0.8 milliseconds.
( c ) *Limbs test procedure.* The test procedure for the limbs is as follows: ( 1 ) Seat and orient the dummy without back support on a seating surface that is 11 ±0.2 inches above a horizontal (floor) surface as specified in § 572.78(c). ( i ) Orient the dummy as specified in Figure 43 with the hip joint adjustment at any setting between 1g and 2g.
( ii ) Place the dummy legs in a plane parallel to the dummy's midsagittal plane with the knee pivot center line perpendicular to the dummy's midsagittal plane, and with the feet flat on the horizontal (floor) surface.
( iii ) Adjust the feet and lower legs until the line between the midpoint of each knee pivot and each ankle pivot is within 2 degrees of the vertical.
( 2 ) If necessary, reposition the dummy so that at the level one inch below the seating surface, the rearmost point of the dummy's lower legs remains not less than 3 inches and not more than 6 inches forward of the forward edge of the seat.
( 3 ) Align the test probe specified in § 572.77(a) with the longitudinal center line of the femur force gauge, so that at impact, the probe's longitudinal center line coincides with the sensor's longitudinal center line within ±2 degrees.
( 4 ) Impact the knee with the test probe moving horizontally and parallel to the midsagittal plane at the specified velocity.
( 5 ) Guide the test probe during impact so that there is no significant lateral, vertical, or rotational movement.
###### Editorial Note on Part 572

#### Editorial Notes:

1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 572.166 Knees and knee impact test procedure.

The knee assembly is assembled and tested as specified in 49 CFR 572.126 (Subpart N).
From: Eric Dalton [mailto:eric.dalton@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 12:27 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

I am submitting a comment regarding annuitizing private 401k and IRA assets. I do not want the 

federal government, or any government, to take from me my money or my ability to make my own 

financial decisions. I am adamantly opposed to this scheme to confiscate the private assets of 

American citizens to fund additional irresponsible federal spending. 

Respectfully, 

Eric Dalton
From: Richard Waterhouse [mailto:arctophile@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 5:52 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 

Annuities are notorious for not addressing inflation during one's retirement years. If you include an annuity 

option in 401ks, you need to address the inflation issue the retiree will face. One approach I have seen used 

is for the annuity to offer an option of a fixed percent increase in the payment each year, but such an option 

is a rare exception. 

 

Another issue that needs to be addressed if private insurance companies are used to provide the annuities is 

what to do if the insurer goes bankrupt. Think what would have happened if the government hadn't bailed 

out AIG. 

 

 

Richard Waterhouse 

arctophile@earthlink.net

EarthLink Revolves Around You.
Coös,

Dec., 1899.

#### Parsons *v.*Jameson.

Assumpsit, to recover for services as an attorney. Trial by jury. The jury were instructed to return as their verdict such sum as the services were reasonably worth. No instruction was given or requested on the question of interest. There was a verdict for the plaintiff, to which he moved that interest be added from the date of the writ. The motion was granted, subject to the defendant’s exception.

*James 1. Parsons*and *Daley G-oss,*for the plaintiff.

*Thomas F. Johnson*and *Chamberlin .Rich,*for the defendant.

Wallace, J.

The plaintiff’s motion to add interest to the verdict should not have been granted. If he desired an instruction for the allowance of interest, he should have asked for it before the jury retired. By his failure to do so, he waived his right to it and all objections for the want of it, in the same manner he would his right to any other instruction. *Pitman*v. Mauran, 69 N. H. 230.

*Exception sustained.*

Peaslee, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
From: Perdue, David K [mailto:David.K.Perdue@morganstanley.com] 

Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 12:21 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

AS A PROFESSIONAL MANAGER OF 150 IRA ACCOUNTS HELD BY INDIVIDUALS OF 

MODEST TO MIDDLE INCOME I FIND THE EXISTING PROPOSAL WOULD DO 

SERIOUS DAMAGE TO THEIR FINANCIAL WELL BEING. ALL OF THESE INDIVIDUALS 

PURCHASE GOVERNMENT GUARANTEED SPECIFIC FIXED INCOME INSTRUMENTS 

IN A BROKERAGE ACCT. I CHARGE THEM A 1⁄2% COMMISSION. AFTER THAT ON 

ANY SECURITY THERE ARE NO FURTHER CHARGES. IF I AM FORCED TO CONVERT 

THESE ACCOUNTS TO A FEE BASED STRUCTURE, THEY WILL END UP PAYING ME 

(E.G. A .5% FEE EACH YEAR TILL THE BOND MATURES.) ON A 10 YR AGENCY I 

WILL EARN 5% OVER THE LIFE OF THE SECURITY NOT .5%. AS A CONSEQUENCE IN 

AN ERA OF LOW INTEREST RATES THEY WILL BE RUINED. FOR THE PURCHASE OF 

GOVERNMENT GUARANTEED SPECIFIC BONDS IN BROKERAGE ACCTS. THE RULE 

SHOULD NOT APPLY AND AN EXCEPTION GRANTED TO THESE TYPES OF 

ACCOUNTS.

Important Notice to Recipients:

Please do not use e-mail to request, authorize or effect the purchase or sale of any security or 

commodity. Unfortunately, we cannot execute such instructions provided in e-mail. Thank you.

The sender of this e-mail is an employee of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC ("Morgan Stanley"). If you 

have received this communication in error, please destroy all electronic and paper copies and notify the 

sender immediately. Erroneous transmission is not intended to waive confidentiality or privilege. Morgan 

Stanley reserves the right, to the extent permitted under applicable law, to monitor electronic 

communications. This message is subject to terms available at the following link: 

http://www.morganstanley.com/disclaimers/mssbemail.html. If you cannot access this link, please notify 

us by reply message and we will send the contents to you. By messaging with Morgan Stanley you 

consent to the foregoing.
Marines upgrade control tower
 By Sgt. Wayne Edmiston , 2nd Marine Logistics Group
  Marines inspect the metal frame of a new air traffic control tower. Combat engineers with Marine Wing Support Squadron 272 are currently constructing an air traffic control tower to create a better working environment for its air traffic controllers. Photo by: Sgt. Wayne Edmiston.  AL TAQADDUM, Iraq, (Dec. 5, 2007) — The AN/TSQ-120B is a temporary air traffic control tower used by Marines in expeditionary operations until a more sturdy structure can be built. Although designed for just 90 days of continual use, the one at Al Taqaddum Air Base has seen more than its share of sorties since it was raised during the early stages of Operation Iraqi Freedom. After years of planning by previous deployed units, combat engineers with Marine Wing Support Squadron 272 were recently assigned to construct a new, state of the art tower. Working around delays caused by constant changes in the weather and aircraft flybys, the Marines poured the 30-by-30 foot concrete foundation and erected the prefabricated frame that will offer more capabilities to controllers. The current expeditionary tower only allows controllers a 180-degree view of the airfield, but, once completed, the new one will provide an all-encompassing, 360-degree view, according to Master Sgt. Alexander M. Gutierrez, the Air Traffic Control Operations Chief for Marine Air Control Squadron 2. “It lets (the controllers) work a whole lot better because they can see every aircraft they are working with,” said Gutierrez, a Kansas City, Kan., native. “It relieves a lot of pressure that comes with a challenging job.” With more than 300 flights daily and 10,300 monthly, Al Taqaddum rivals most medium-sized commercial airports in the United States. The air traffic controllers here are responsible for ensuring the safety of all the inbound and outbound traffic, all of which is supporting the efforts of Multi National Force-West in Al Anbar Province. The Marines working on the tower plan to have it completed within two to three weeks, according to the project’s staff noncommissioned officer in charge, Gunnery Sgt. Jason R. Gillepsie “It takes considerable effort and a lot of skill to get something like this accomplished,” the Walla Walla, Wash., native said. And since it has taken this long to get a new tower started, the engineers said they are putting their skills to work and ensuring it is built to last above all else. “This is going to be a structure that is going to be here for a while and a lot of people are going to see it and even work in it,” Lance Cpl. Michael A. Kemp, a combat engineer and Crawfordsville, Ind., native said. “It’s the gratification of getting to help your fellow Marines that I enjoy.”
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 464 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 182
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 464

                          [Report No. 107-552]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                June 27 (legislative day, June 26), 2002

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of Thursday, June 27, 2002, 
providing for consideration or disposition of the bill (H.R. 4954) to 
amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for a voluntary 
program for prescription drug coverage under the Medicare Program, to 
modernize and reform payments and the regulatory structure of the 
Medicare Program, and for other purposes.

                                                 House Calendar No. 182

107th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 464

                          [Report No. 107-552]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                June 27 (legislative day, June 26), 2002

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
#### Emily D. Jex and another, Appellants, v. The Mayor, etc., of the City of New York, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000022709
<NAME> WESTFORD GROUP
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           26794
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   320452
<ALLOWANCES>                                      4000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                552267
<PP&E>                                          216924
<DEPRECIATION>                                  152880
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  791060
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           266150
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        871286
<OTHER-SE>                                     (409147)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    791060
<SALES>                                        1389459
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1390381
<CGS>                                           815399
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1240316
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               18563
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 131502
<INCOME-TAX>                                     31579
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              99923
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     99923
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 393

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 393 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 393.46 [Reserved]
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 9/7/15 

Received: September 05, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8kye-s4tb

Comments Due: September 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule- Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-5141

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Mike O'Brien

Address: 

6515 Failing Street

West Linn, OR, 97068

Email: ob5@comcast.net

General Comment

Financial advisors should be required to put the clients interests first in retirement accounts. 

There should be full visibility into the comparative commissions and back-end compensation 

received by financial advisors in advance of any sale
# Presidential Determination on Continuation of U.S. Drug Interdiction Assistance to the Government of Colombia

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the Secretary of Defense

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 1012 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995, as amended (22 U.S.C. 2291-4), I hereby certify, with respect to Colombia, that: (1) interdiction of aircraft reasonably suspected to be primarily engaged in illicit drug trafficking in that country's airspace is necessary because of the extraordinary threat posed by illicit drug trafficking to the national security of that country; and (2) that country has appropriate procedures in place to protect against innocent loss of life in the air and on the ground in connection with such interdiction, which shall at a minimum include effective means to identify and warn an aircraft before the use of force is directed against the aircraft.

                    The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to publish this determination in the                     **Federal Register**                     and to notify the Congress of this determination.                

[FR Doc. 07-4284

Billing code 4710-10
https://fdms.erulemaking .net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call-...

REG. I4PbPl- 09

FEB 9 2 wI0

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS As of: February 22, 2010
BRANCH Received: February 20, 2010

Status: Posted

P U B LIC SU B M ISSIO N Posted: February 22, 2010
Tracking No. 80aa90e1

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0006
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants & Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Comment On: IRS-2010-0006-0001
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Document: IRS-2010-0006-0036
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-02028

Submitter Information

Name: linda marie johnson
Address:
6483 south co rd 60sw
greensburg, IN, 47240
Email: lwj@decaturwb.com
Phone: 812-591-2697
Fax:ina
Submitter's Representative: michael pence
Organization: na

General Comment

Dear Sir or Madam,

Tam writing in reference to some proposed new rules regarding IRA and 401k rules. I feel that a
citizen should have full and complete control over their own financial future. We do not need the
government to help us save for retirement.

Please do not consider changing any existing rules. LEAVE MY IRA ALONE !!

Sincerely, Linda M. Johnson

Page 1 of 1

2/22/2010
### Water levels in, extent of freshwater in, and water withdrawals from ten confined aquifers, New Jersey and Delaware coastal plain, 1998

By: P.J. LacombeRobert Rosman**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wri004143

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
H. Res. 378

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 11, 2002.

Resolved, That at a time designated by the Speaker of

the House of Representatives, official photographs of the

House may be taken while the House is in actual session.

Payment for the costs associated with taking, preparing, and

distributing such photographs may be made from the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Clerk.