alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

114) IV-C-80 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:57AM Sheet 114 of 232 

II II 

n 

S 

u II II li li ii 'i 

0 

i ii 

i ii tj i! 11 

0 II ii 

« ji ii il 

1 

| ii 

n ll 1) 

.) II ii ii 

« i! II i! 

» 

i 

\ !l il 

n l| jj ii II j) i; ii 

i ii ii ii li I! 

d II ii li |i ii ii ii II il 

I |i ii .i ii II ii li it i' ii ii II ii 

» !i ;l l' 
P.2 

+«***% 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

R-87-li 

jX -c - %& 

5 -AJH M uj Ul"<lll!iU*)lAlC4JI'l'*"i"""" J 1 "^-'-***' * 

\ SyjZZ ° WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

'"V PRO'*-0 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Honorable Michael Dewine 

House of Representatives 

Washington, D.C. 20515 

Dear Mr. Dewine: 

Thank you for passing along the comments from your 

constituent, Mr. F. J. Hubbard, concerning EPA's proposal to 

require onboard refueling emission controls. Be assured that 

these comments will be considered as we prepare our final rule, 

We will also be placing them in the public docket for the 

rulemaking (Docket No. A-87-11). 

Thank you again for your concern in this matter. 

Sincerely yours, 

Richard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 

cc: Docket A-87-11 

Prepared by: Form Letter:sal:2/19/88:AL880723 - Ann Arbor, MI 

bcc: Region 05 

Congressional Liaison/Quinn 

Docket A-87-11 c/o Jackie McManus
#### § 25.215 Requirements for agency information systems.

Each Federal agency that awards Federal financial assistance (see § 25.400) must ensure that its information systems are able to both accept and transmit the UEI as the universal identifier for Federal financial assistance applicants and recipients.
#### § 821.10 Computation of time.

In computing any period of time prescribed or allowed by this part, by notice or order of a law judge or the Board, or by any applicable statute, the date of the act, event or default after which the designated period of time begins to run is not to be included in the computation. The last day of the period so computed is to be included unless it is a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday for the Board, in which event the period runs until the end of the next day which is not a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday. In all cases, Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays for the Board shall be included in the computation of time, except they shall not be included in computations of time respecting petitions for review of determinations as to the existence of emergencies under § 821.54.
In The Matter Of: 

SERVED: September 21, 2016 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Docket No. FAA-2016-4264 

BEM SYSTEMS, INC. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2015NM730029 

Respondent 

ORDER FINALIZING LITIGATION SCHEDULE 

On August 18, 2016, the undersigned judge held a prehearing conference in the above 

captioned case. During the course of the conference, the parties developed a joint litigation 

schedule with a timeline dependent upon the hearing date. 

On August 22, 2016, the undersigned judge issued a Prehearing Conference Report, ordering 

the parties to adhere to the joint litigation schedule. 

On September 19,2016, the undersigned judge issued a Notice ofHearing, setting the 

hearing in this case to begin on February 28, 2017. 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §§ 13.205(a)(6) and 13.217(d), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. Complete witness and evidence lists shall be exchanged by the parties and submitted to the 

undersigned judge by January 27,2017. 

2. Any subpoena requests shall be submitted to the undersigned judge by January 27,2017. 

3. Each party shall provide the undersigned judge a CD containing digital copies of premarked 

versions of all proposed exhibits by January 27,2017. 

4. The parties may, during the course of the hearing, request the opportunity to submit 

posthearing briefs pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.231(c). 

Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment: Service List 
SERVICE LIST - BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

BEM Systems, Inc., Respondent 

ATTN: Mark Murset, CFO 

100 Passaic A venue 

Chatham, NJ 07928 

Glenn H. Brown, Complainant's Counsel 

Enforcement Division, Western Team 

Federal Aviation Administration 

222 West 7th A venue Box 14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

TEL: 907-271-5271 

FAX: 907-271-2800 

ONE COPY 

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2016-4264 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
-----Original Message-----

From: Owner [mailto:booley51@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 3:06 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN1210-AB32

Any provisions in RIN1210-AB32 that restrict or prohibit owners of IRA accounts from utilizing standard 

options should be eliminated from the proposal. As the owner of several self directed IRAs, I have 

utilized options to enhance the return on my retirement accounts for over 10 years.

In the ultra low interest environment we are experiencing, the last thing the country needs is something 

else holding down the return people can achieve on their savings.

Sincerely,

Bill Smith
-----------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of 1 

AUG 1 8 2010 

rLEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 


PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS 


BRANCH 
 As of: August 18, 2010 

Received: August 09, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 18, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2c604 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, :2010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-001O 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-001O-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-2010-001O-0152 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: Austin D McMillin 

Address: 

1033 Regents Blvd 

Ste 204 

Fircrest, WA, 98466 

Email: admcmillin@qwestoffice.net 

Phone: 253-564-1288 

Organization: ProActive Spine Care 

General Comment 

See attached file(s) 

Attachments 

IRS-2010-0010-0152.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

http://fdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency/componentlsubmitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/18/2010 
August 9, 2010 

Office ofConsumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCII0-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance 

Coverage Relating to Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient 

Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to 

formally comment on the interim final rule regarding health plans and 

"grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-201O-0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part ofthe new health care law 

are vitally important and should be extended to as many people as possible. 

Accordingly, every effort should be made to increase the number of 

individuals covered by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

(PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing 

"grandfathered" plans should not be weakened or reduced in any way. I 

specifically support the position and detailed comments offered by the 

American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of 

these regulations. 

Austin McMillin
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 106 (Thursday, June 2, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 31935]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13825]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE AND TIME:  Friday, June 10, 2011; 9:30 a.m. EDT.

PLACE:  624 Ninth Street, NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

Meeting Agenda

    This meeting is open to the public.

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Approval of Apr. 8, 2011 Meeting Minutes
III. Program Planning: Update and discussion of projects.
     Consideration of statutory report topic for FY 2012
     Eminent Domain Briefing
IV. State Advisory Committee Issues:
     Discussion of Commissioner membership on SACs
     Re-chartering the Connecticut SAC
     Re-chartering the Tennessee SAC
V. Management and Operations:
     Staff Director's report
VI. Announcements
VII. Adjourn

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact Pamela 
Dunston at least three (3) days before the scheduled meeting date at 
(202) 376-8105.

    Dated: May 31, 2011.
Kimberly A. Tolhurst,
Senior Attorney-Advisor.
[FR Doc. 2011-13825 Filed 5-31-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
## CE Weekly

 

 

## CE Magazine Archives

                  - 2018                      - Posted 06/06/2018
                  - 2017 **Vol 25 No 1****Vol 25 No 2****Vol 25 No 3****2017 SME Directory** 
                  - 2016 **Vol 24 No 1****Vol 24 No 2****Vol 24 No 2SME Directory** 
                  - 2015 **Vol 23 No 1****Vol 23 No 2** 
                  - 2014 **Vol 22 No 1********Vol 22 No 2********Vol 22 No 3** 
                  - 2013 **Vol 21 No 1****Vol 21 No 2****Vol 21 No 3** 
                  - 2012 **Vol 20 No 1****Vol 20 No 2****Vol 20 No 3****Vol 20 No 4** 
                  - 2011 **Vol 19 No 1****Vol 19 No 2****Vol 19 No 3****Vol 19 No 4** 
                  - 2010 **Vol 18 No 1****Vol 18 No 2****Vol 18 No 3****Vol 18 No 4** 
                  - 2009 **Vol 17 No 1****Vol 17 No 2****Vol 17 No 3****Vol 17 No 4** 
                  - 2008 **Vol 16 No 1****Vol 16 No 2****Vol 16 No 3****Vol 16 No 4** 
                  - 2007 **Vol 15 No 1****Vol 15 No 2****Vol 15 No 3****Vol 15 No 4** 
                  - 2006 **Vol 14 No 1****Vol 14 No 2****Vol 14 No 3****Vol 14 No 4** 
                  - 2005 **Vol 13 No 1****Vol 13 No 2****Vol 13 No 3****Vol 13 No 4** 
                  - 2004 **Vol 12 No 1****Vol 12 No 2****Vol 12 No 3** 
                  - 2003 **Vol 11 No 1****Vol 11 No 3****Vol 11 No 3****Vol 11 No 4** 
                  - 2002 **Vol 10 No 1****Vol 10 No 2****Vol 10 No 3** 
                  - 2001 **Vol 9 No 1****Vol 9 No 2****Vol 9 No 3****Vol 9 No 4** 
                  - 2000 **Vol 8 No 1****Vol 8 No 2****Vol 8 No 3****Vol 8 No 4** 
                  - 1999 **Vol 7 No 1****Vol 7 No 2****Vol 7 No 3****Vol 7 No 4**
§ 800.45 Interim rulemaking procedures. ( a ) An interim rule may be issued when it is in the public interest to promulgate an effective rule while keeping the rulemaking open for further refinement. For example, an interim rule may be issued in instances when normal procedures for notice and comment prior to issuing an effective rule are not required, minor changes to the final rule may be necessary after the interim rule has been in place for some time, or the interim rule only implements portions of a proposed rule, while other portions of the proposed rule are still under development.
( b ) An interim rule will be published in the Federal Register with an effective date on or after the date of publication. After the effective date, an interim rule is enforceable and is codified in the next annual revision of the Code of Federal Regulations.
National security major piece to Afghan human rights puzzle
 By G.A. Volb , NATO Training Mission - Afghanistan
  100922_Education
 CAMP EGGERS, Afghanistan (Sept. 22, 2010) — Everything, to include human rights  progress, hinges on the ability of the Afghan government to provide  security for the nation. Prof. Ashraf Rasuli, legal advisor to Afghan President Hamid Karzai,  said it was a crucial piece to the puzzle during the “Islam and Human  Rights” symposium held here Sept. 20. “Most people define human rights as the collection of regulations and  laws developed in order to bring justice and civility to a society and  protect individual rights,” Rasuli said. “Without security, it’s  extremely difficult for a society to progress.” The professor shared his insight with 40-plus members of the Afghan  Ministry of Interior Legal Affairs Department, representatives of the  Afghan Civil Order Police or ANCOP, and members of the coalition effort.  Dignitaries attending included: Afghan Maj. Gen. Abdul Rahim Shuja,  chief of legal affairs; and Maj. Gen. Abdul Masoud Ragheb, chief of the  inspector general’s office. Since taking office President Karzai has initiated a government  commission to deal with human rights issues at the national level,  working issues through the judiciary system and ANP resources, plus  Afghanistan has agreed to international human rights declarations.  “Islam,” emphasized Rasuli, “provides for the welfare of Muslims ... essentially regulations governing an Islamic society. “The government,” he pointed out, “also has a responsibility to  determine how to institute and enforce these rights. Currently, we’re  focusing on the basics – developing commissions to look into possible  abuses and including rights in the constitution.” The slight of build, grey-haired professor suggested that as security  improves and the Afghan government matures, so will its ability to  address human rights issues; to include social and political rights.  “Nobody,” he emphasized, “has the power to strip another of their basic  human rights – to live freely, to work and to provide for their family.  And we will not accept any law contrary to the religion of Islam.”
H. Res. 419

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 15, 2002.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 3994) to authorize economic and democratic

development assistance for Afghanistan and to authorize military assistance for Afghanistan and certain other foreign

countries. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed

with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall

not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on

International Relations. After general debate the bill shall be

considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall

be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of

amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the

nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on

International Relations now printed in the bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be con-
2

•HRES 419 EH

sidered by title rather than by section. Each title shall be

considered as read. During consideration of the bill for

amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole

may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the

Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed

in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for

that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and

report the bill to the House with such amendments as may

have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote

in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee

of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in

the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be

considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to

final passage without intervening motion except one motion

to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
Docket No. FAA-2012-1035

. Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 10/20/11

Regional Airline Association 10/20/11

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 10/20/11

ATA Joe White 10/20/11
§ 579.6 Address for submitting reports and other information. ( a ) Except as provided by paragraph (b) of this section, information, reports, and documents required to be submitted to NHTSA pursuant to this part may be submitted by mail, by facsimile, or by e-mail. If submitted by mail, they must be addressed to the Associate Administrator for Enforcement, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Attention: Early Warning Division (NVS-217), 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. If submitted by facsimile, they must be addressed to the Associate Administrator for Enforcement and transmitted to (202) 366-7882. If submitted by e-mail, submissions under subpart B of this part must be submitted to *frecalls@dot.gov* and submissions under § 579.5 must be submitted to *tsb@dot.gov .*
( b ) ( 1 ) Information, documents and reports that are submitted to NHTSA's early warning data repository must be submitted in accordance with § 579.29 of this part. Submissions must be made by a means that permits the sender to verify that the report was in fact received by NHTSA and the day it was received by NHTSA.
( 2 ) The annual list of substantially similar vehicles submitted pursuant to § 579.11(e) of this part shall be submitted to NHTSA's early warning data repository identified on NHTSA's Web page *http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/ewr/ewr.cfm .* A manufacturer shall use the template provided at the early warning Web site, also identified on NHTSA's Web page *http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/ewr/xls.cfm ,* for submitting the list.
[68 FR 4113, Jan. 28, 2003, as amended at 72 FR 32017, June 11, 2007; 78 FR 51424, Aug. 20, 2013]
From: Randy Kent [mailto:randykent1@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 10:41 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

To whom it may concern. 

 

I have earned the money in my IRA's and 401K's by my own hard 

work. I choose how it is invested using the knowledge that I have 

gained by my learning about my options. 

 

I do not wish the federal government to "help" me manage my 

money. I will assume the risk, and accept the results of my choices. 

 

The Social Security system already is working for me. 

 

My IRA's and 401K's are my business. Not that of the federal 

government. 

 

Yours,

Randy Kent
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7500

RICHARD T. MAYS,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

KEITH WHITENER, Superintendent; DANNY FREEMAN, Unit 

Manager; TONI BANKS, Assistant Unit Manager,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Frank D. Whitney, 

Chief District Judge. (1:14-cv-00268-FDW)

Submitted: February 16, 2016 Decided: February 23, 2016

Before KEENAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard T. Mays, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Richard T. Mays appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Mays v. Whitener, No. 1:14-cv-00268-FDW 

(W.D.N.C. Apr. 28, 2015). We deny Mays’ motion for injunction, 

and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
CENTCOM’s Regional Cooperation 23 underway in Montana
 
  By Sgt. 1st Class Terra Gatti
  **HELENA, Mont. —** Exercise Regional Cooperation 23, an annual U.S. Central Command-sponsored exercise, is underway in Helena, Montana. The exercise, this year hosted by the Montana National Guard at the Helena Aviation Readiness Center, kicked off Aug. 8, 2023, and brings together military personnel from Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Pakistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, as well as U.S. personnel from across the nation, including Soldiers and Airmen from the Arizona, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Montana and Virginia National Guard.
“Regional Cooperation is an unmatched opportunity to strengthen relationships with our partner nations and improve our ability to work together,” said Maj. Stephen Jung, the lead planner for RC23.
During the first several days of the exercise, more than 230 exercise participants gathered at Fort Harrison to establish a base of knowledge on the Military Decision Making Process, or MDMP. Then, on Aug. 12, 2023, the exercise officially started, with U.S. and partner nation personnel working together to respond to an international security threat.
“The goal is for a multinational team to work together and develop a combined military response to the exercise scenarios,” Jung explained.
Over the course of six days, RC23 participants will face scenarios designed to enhance regional security and stability; increase national capabilities; sharpen techniques and procedures for the interdiction of weapons of mass destruction, terrorist elements and narcotics; and increase interoperability and information sharing.
U.S. and Central and South Asian nations have been involved in the annual RC exercise since 2004.
“This exercise is really about collaboration and building relationships,” Jung said. “When you spend time working alongside military personnel from a partner nation, what you’ll inevitably find is commonalities. My hope is that, when we leave Montana, we all leave with a better understanding of our partnerships, as well as stronger relationships, not only between our military forces at the higher level, but also at the individual level.”