alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 391
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 391 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 391.45 Persons who must be medically examined and certified. The following persons must be medically examined and certified in accordance with § 391.43 as physically qualified to operate a commercial motor vehicle: ( a ) Any person who has not been medically examined and certified as physically qualified to operate a commercial motor vehicle;
( b ) Any driver who has not been medically examined and certified as qualified to operate a commercial motor vehicle during the preceding 24 months, unless the driver is required to be examined and certified in accordance with paragraph (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), or (h) of this section;
( c ) Any driver authorized to operate a commercial motor vehicle only within an exempt intra-city zone pursuant to § 391.62, if such driver has not been medically examined and certified as qualified to drive in such zone during the preceding 12 months;
( d ) [Reserved]
( e ) Any driver who has diabetes mellitus treated with insulin for control and who has obtained a medical examiner's certificate under the standards in § 391.46, if such driver's most recent medical examination and certification as qualified to drive did not occur during the preceding 12 months;
( f ) Any driver who does not satisfy, with the worse eye, either the distant visual acuity standard with corrective lenses or the field of vision standard, or both, in § 391.41(b)(10)(i) and who has obtained a medical examiner's certificate under the standards in § 391.44, if such driver's most recent medical examination and certification as qualified to drive did not occur during the preceding 12 months;
( g ) Any driver whose ability to perform his or her normal duties has been impaired by a physical or mental injury or disease; and
( h ) On or after June 23, 2025, any person found by a medical examiner not to be physically qualified to operate a commercial motor vehicle under the provisions of paragraph (g)(3) of § 391.43.
[83 FR 47520, Sept. 19, 2018, as amended at 86 FR 32651, June 22, 2021; 87 FR 3419, Jan. 21, 2022; 88 FR 80192, Nov. 17, 2023]
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVEOFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the report of iVOW, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSBfor the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael H. Owens,President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. That information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 

Date: August 15, 2005

 

 
|   |   | /s/ Michael  H. Owens               |   |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |   | Michael H.  Owens, M.D.             |   |   |
|   |   | President,  Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
|   |   | and Director                        |   |   |

** **

----
# CJTF-OIR Strike Summary March 10 - 23, 2019

/ Published March 26, 2019

March 26, 2019

Release # 20190326-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

SOUTHWEST ASIA – Combined Joint Task Force – Operation Inherent Resolve and its partners continue to target and pursue the enduring defeat of Daesh.

CJTF-OIR and partner forces have liberated nearly 110,000 square kilometers (42,471 square miles) from Daesh; as a result, 7.7 million people no longer live under Daesh oppression.

CJTF-OIR remains committed to the enduring defeat of Daesh to improve conditions for peace and stability in the region, and to protect all our homelands from Daesh's terrorist threat.

Strike Summary

Between March 10 - 23, 2019, CJTF-OIR conducted 250 strikes consisting of 398 engagements against Daesh targets in Syria and Iraq.

In Syria, CJTF-OIR conducted 193 strikes consisting of 338 engagements, engaged 346 Daesh tactical units, and destroyed 104 vehicles, 63 supply routes, 39 fighting positions, 31 vehicle borne improvised explosive devices, nine tactical vehicles, six fuel tankers, four weapons caches, two command and control nodes, one tunnel, one tanker for petroleum oil and lubricants, one mortar system, and one checkpoint.

In Iraq, CJTF-OIR conducted 57 strikes consisting of 60 engagements, engaged 44 Daesh tactical units, and destroyed 14 supply routes, three buildings, two fighting position, one weapons cache, and one cave.

Between March 10 - 23, 2019, CJTF-OIR detected 72 strikes from other actors that crossed the Euphrates River Valley. CJTF-OIR is committed to avoiding and in every case minimizing civilian casualties; CJTF-OIR calls on all other actors in the area to observe the same precautions.

This Coalition strike release contains all strikes conducted by fighter, attack, bomber, rotary-wing, or remotely piloted aircraft, rocket propelled artillery and ground-based tactical artillery.

A strike, as defined in the Coalition release, refers to one or more kinetic engagements that occur in roughly the same geographic location to produce a single, sometimes cumulative effect in that location. For example, a single aircraft delivering a single weapon against a lone Daesh vehicle is one strike, but so is multiple aircraft delivering dozens of weapons against a group of Daesh-held buildings and weapon systems in a compound, having the cumulative effect of making that facility harder or impossible to use. Strike assessments are based on initial reports and may be refined.

CJTF-OIR does not report the number or type of aircraft employed in a strike, the number of munitions dropped in each strike, or the number of individual munition impact points against a target. The information used to compile the daily strike releases is based on 'Z' or Greenwich Mean Time.

#DefeatDaesh
Coalition Counter IED Conference 2010
 By Lt. Col. Michael Thoegersen and Maj. Peter Forsberg ,
  TAMPA — Defeating the global threat of improvised explosive devices is a military priority, especially in Afghanistan and other hotspots. The Counter Improvised Explosives Device Conference here, Sept. 27-29, will bring together subject matter experts to help solve problems related to IEDs. The conference was organized by U.S. Central Command’s Coalition CIED working group, in cooperation with CENTCOM’s J3 Counter Improvised Explosives Device Branch. This year’s conference will go more in depth than the previous conference in November 2009. This year’s theme centers on defeating IED Systems. Counter IED professionals will share best practices that promote a holistic approach to defeating the global threat that is critical to protecting our nations’ forces. More than 80 percent of all casualties in Afghanistan are produced by IEDs. Year to date, IED activity in Afghanistan increased by more than 140 percent compared to the same period last year. Military and civilian sector subject matter experts from law enforcement, industry, and academia will enhance the overall success of the conference, to defeat that threat. Selected individuals from various CIED organizations and agencies will present briefings and participate in panel discussions and working groups. The end-state of the CIED conference is to gain a new perspective on CIED by using all of the government’s resources; and, to open and improve relations between participating organizations and countries. The conference will also provide concrete actions to assist coalition partners and enhance their CIED capabilities To achieve a tangible outcome for all participating individuals, nations and organizations, briefers from many influential organizations including the U.S. State Department, Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, Department of Defense and Explosive Ordinance Disposal units from coalition partners will participate. Several similar CIED-forums already exist but no other forum is attempting the same outreach as the CENTCOM Coalition. Every nation approaches “Defeating IED networks” differently. This opportunity will give each nation the opportunity to further refine its collective knowledge and respective approach to “Defeating the Network.” This global approach will tie law enforcement, Department of Defense and coalition countries together. The conference is at the CENTCOM JIOC (LCDR Otis Vincent Tolbert Building), in Tampa. For more information, contact the CIED Working Group at (813) 827 2999.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 320 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                      December 20 (legislative day, December 19), 2001.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill 
(H.R. 3529) to provide tax incentives for economic recovery and assistance to 
displaced workers. The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage 
without intervening motion except: (1) two hours of debate on the bill equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit. The yeas and nays 
shall be considered as ordered on the question of passage. Clause 5(b) of rule 
XXI shall not apply to the bill or amendments thereto.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2404

AN ACT

To extend authorities under the Middle East Peace Facilitation Act of 1994 until November 1, 1995, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION. 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 583(a) of the Foreign Re5 lations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995

6 (Public Law 103–236), as amended by Public Law 104–
2

1 22, is amended by striking ‘‘October 1, 1995,’’ and insert2 ing ‘‘November 1, 1995,’’.

3 (b) CONSULTATION.—For purposes of any exercise of

4 the authority provided in section 583(a) of the Foreign

5 Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995

6 (Public Law 103–236) prior to October 5, 1995, the writ7 ten policy justification dated June 1, 1995, and submitted

8 to the Congress in accordance with section 583(b)(1) of

9 such Act, and the consultations associated with such policy

10 justification, shall be deemed to satisfy the requirements

11 of section 583(b)(1) of such Act.

Passed the House of Representatives September 28,

1995.

Attest:

Clerk.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2404

AN ACT

To extend authorities under the Middle East Peace

and for other purposes.Facilitation Act of 1994 until November 1, 1995,
# Top Army Adjutant General Leaders visit, discuss AG Corps future with U.S. Army Central HR professionals

/ Published Dec. 11, 2020
SHAW AIR FORCE BASE, S.C, 
The U.S. Army Adjutant General School Commandant and leadership team visited U.S. Army Central headquarters for the first time and participated in an USARCENT HR educational forum, Dec. 3, 2020.Over 100 USARCENT HR Soldiers and Civilians throughout the Middle East and Main Command Post at Shaw AFB tuned in for the virtual learning experience with Col. Marcus Motley, AG School Commandant, Command Sgt. Maj. Robert Atkinson, AG Corps Senior Enlisted Advisor, and Chief Warrant Officer 5 Mark Hickman, AG Corps Chief Warrant Officer."The center of gravity for the U.S. Army is the Soldier," said Col. Davie Wright, USARCENT Director of Human Resources. "Priorities like readiness, modernization, and reform, drive changes in the HR community, and we're fortunate to be located near the Soldier Support Institute where the AG School commandant and Corps leaders develop doctrine, training, and force structure across the globe."Due to ever-changing doctrine and contingency operations, the USARCENT HR team hosts weekly assessment briefs and educational forums to ensure units that support USARCENT meet specified milestones and receive the latest information."Our team's mission is to support contingency operations throughout the theater and ensure Soldiers are trained and ready to support commanders no matter the mission," said Wright. "Being able to discuss the State of the AG Corps, Professional Military Education curriculum changes, and the implementation and training of the Integrated Personnel and Pay System with the Army's AG leaders was paramount."Sgt. 1st Class Marshall Padgett, the USARCENT HR Plans and Operations Senior Enlisted Advisor, said, "During this forum, we also discussed realignments of units and personnel and how the HR community can help contribute to the force."He said, "It's not every day that a specialist in theater or any unit can ask the Regimental Sergeant Major a question and get a direct answer.""Changes to doctrine and plans can't happen without feedback from the field," Wright added. "You can have a concept, but what's most valuable is receiving feedback from Soldiers about what's feasible to execute."USARCENT is a Coalition Forces Land Component Command and the Army Service Component Command of Central Command."We're different from organizations like U.S. Army Europe and U.S. Pacific Command," said Padgett. "Unlike them, we don't live in our theater. Our MCP is in America, and our theater is in the Middle East.""We're grateful to have AG Corps Leaders participate in our educational forum," said Wright. "We were able to explain the complexities and variables of the USARCENT HR mission, and provide our Corps' top leaders the information needed to advocate on our behalf."
CENTCOM Month in Review: The Fight Against ISIS in Iraq and Syria
 
  Jun. 6, 2023
Release Number 20230606-01
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE  **TAMPA, Fla. –** During the month of May 2023 U.S. Central Command-led coalition forces and partner forces conducted 38 operations against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. These operations resulted in 31 ISIS operatives detained and 8 killed. “Our partner forces continue to demonstrate the capability, capacity, and competence to maintain the enduring defeat of ISIS," said Maj. Gen. Matthew McFarlane, Commanding General of Combined Joint Task Force – Operation Inherent Resolve. "The Coalition continues to Advise, Assist, and Enable our partners to keep pressure on ISIS and prevent them from re-establishing any type of network or effective military effort." The following is a summary of the D-ISIS operations for May 2023: • In Iraq:
   • In Syria:- 21 partnered operations
   - 17 partnered operations- 0 U.S.-only operations
   - 0 U.S.-only operations- 11 ISIS operatives detained
   - 20 ISIS operatives detained- 6 ISIS operatives killed
   - 2 ISIS operatives killed  “Despite their degraded capability, ISIS remains a significant threat within the region,” General Kurilla said. “CENTCOM, along with our partners, is committed to the enduring defeat of ISIS.” -30-
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 32 Agreed to House (ATH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 32

 Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2001

 Mr. Kirk submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following named Members be and are hereby, 
elected to the following standing committees of the House of 
Representatives:
    Committee on the Budget: Mr. Kirk.
    Committee on Energy and Commerce: Mr. Bass to rank after Mr. 
Radanovich.
    Committee on Government Reform: Mr. Weldon of Florida; Mr. Cannon; 
Mr. Putnam; Mr. Otter, and Mr. Schrock.
    Committee on Resources: Mr. Flake and Mr. Rehberg.
    Committee on Science: Mr. Shays to rank after Mrs. Morella.
    Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure: Mr. Pombo and Mr. 
Hayes to rank after Mr. Isakson.
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs: Mr. Brown of South Carolina.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 826.6 Allowable fees and expenses.

(a) Awards will be based on rates customarily charged by persons engaged in the business of acting as attorneys, agents, and expert witnesses, even if the services were made available without charge or at a reduced rate to the applicant.

(b)

(1) No award for the fee of an attorney or agent under these rules may exceed $75 indexed as follows:

The CPI to be used is the annual average CPI, All Urban Consumers, U.S. City Average, All Items, except where a local, All Item index is available. Where a local index is available, but results in a manifest inequity vis-a-vis the U.S. City Average, the U.S. City Average may be used. The numerator of that equation is the yearly average for the year(s) the services were provided, with each year calculated separately. If an annual average CPI for a particular year is not yet available, the prior year's annual average CPI shall be used. This formula increases the $75 statutory cap by indexing it to reflect cost of living increases, as authorized in 5 U.S.C. 504(b)(1)(A)(ii). Application of these increased rate caps requires affirmative findings under § 821.6(c) of this chapter. For ease of application, available U.S. City figures are reproduced as follows:

| 1981 | 90.9 |
| --- | --- |
| 1982 | 96.5 |
| 1983 | 99.6 |
| 1984 | 103.9 |
| 1985 | 107.6 |
| 1986 | 109.6 |
| 1987 | 113.6 |
| 1988 | 118.3 |
| 1989 | 124.0 |
| 1990 | 130.7 |
| 1991 | 136.2 |
| 1992 | 140.3 |
| 1993 | 144.5 |

(2) No award to compensate an expert witness may exceed the highest rate at which the agency pays expert witnesses. However, an award may also include the reasonable expenses of the attorney, agent, or witness as a separate item, if the attorney, agent, or witness ordinarily charges clients separately for such expenses.

(c) In determining the reasonableness of the fee sought for an attorney, agent, or expert witness, the administrative law judge shall consider the following:

(1) If the attorney, agent, or witness is in private practice, his or her customary fee for similar services, or if an employee of the applicant, the fully allocated cost of the services;

(2) The prevailing rate for similar services in the community in which the attorney, agent, or witness ordinarily performs services;

(3) The time actually spent in the representation of the applicant;

(4) The time reasonably spent in light of the difficulty or complexity of the issues in the proceeding; and

(5) Such other factors as may bear on the value of the services provided.

(d) The reasonable cost of any study, analysis, engineering report, test, project, or similar matter prepared on behalf of a party may be awarded, to the extent that the charge for the service does not exceed the prevailing rate for similar services, and the study or other matter was necessary for preparation of the applicant's case.

[46 FR 48209, Oct. 1, 1981, as amended at 58 FR 21544, Apr. 22, 1993; 59 FR 30531, June 14, 1994]
#### Buffalo Forge Company, Respondent, *v.*Columbus and Hocking Clay Construction Company, Appellant.

*Buffalo Forge Co.*v. *Columbus & Hocking Clay Constr. Co.,*140 App. Div. 881, affirmed.

(Argued May 9, 1912;

decided May 24, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 29, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action upon contract.

*David Paine*and *Robert Forsyth Little*for appellant.

*Henry W. Killeen*and *John M. Chipman*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
§ 821.26 Motion to dismiss petition for review for lack of standing. Upon motion by the Administrator within the time limit for filing an answer, a petition for review shall be dismissed for lack of standing in either of the following instances: ( a ) If the petition seeks the issuance of the same type of certificate that was under an order of suspension on the date of the denial; or
( b ) If the petition seeks the issuance of the same type of certificate that had been revoked within one year of the date of the denial, unless the order revoking such certificate provides otherwise.
#### § 800.33 Notice of proposed rulemaking.

Unless the NTSB, for good cause, finds notice is impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, and incorporates that finding and a brief statement of the reasons for it in the rule, a notice of proposed rulemaking is issued and interested persons are invited to participate in the rulemaking proceedings under applicable provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553.

[80 FR 57309, Sept. 23, 2015, as amended at 81 FR 75731, Nov. 1, 2016]
##### 



Exhibit 32.A CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2004,
of El Paso CGP Company (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas L. Foshee, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify
(i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Douglas L. FosheeDouglas L. FosheePresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
August 30, 2005 A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
El Paso
CGP Company and will be retained by El Paso CGP Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 650.1 Purpose.

This part establishes private investment project procedures that seek to identify and address Federal Transit Administration requirements that are impediments to the greater use of public-private partnerships and private investment in public transportation capital projects, while protecting the public interest and any public investment in such projects.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 27, 2022

NO. 03-21-00635-CV

L. M., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER AND TRIANA

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on December 1, 2021. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order. Because appellant is 

indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.