alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Gates: U.S. must strengthen ties with Pakistan

/ Published Aug. 13, 2009

WASHINGTON (Aug. 13, 2009) — The United States must maintain relationships with Pakistan for the long term to build trust between the nations, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said here Thursday. 

A new public opinion poll in Pakistan says that only 9 percent of Pakistanis see the United States as a partner, while 64 percent see America as the enemy. The poll is disturbing to defense leaders, but not surprising. “First of all, one of the reasons that the Pakistanis have concerns about us is that we walked away from them twice,” Gates said during a Pentagon news conference. The United States left Pakistan after the Soviets left Afghanistan, and later in the 1990s cut off military contacts with Pakistan in response to Pakistan’s pursuit of nuclear weapons. “So, our military-to-military relations were significantly interrupted,” Gates said. “I think that the Pakistanis, with some legitimacy, question how long are we prepared to stay there?” The Pakistani people wonder if the only reason the United States is working with the government is “because of the war in Afghanistan, or do we value Pakistan as a partner and an ally independent of the war in Afghanistan?” he said. The latter is the case, Gates said, and the fact that Congress is considering bills to provide multi-year economic assistance to Pakistan, proves that. “I think it's going to take us some time to rebuild confidence with the Pakistani people, that we are a long-term friend and ally of Pakistan,” he said. The poll also shows that the Pakistani people have given strong support to the counterinsurgency battle going on in western Pakistan, Gates said. “There seems to be, more than I think any of us would have expected six months ago, broad political support for what the Pakistani military is doing in the west,” he said. That change — plus the success of Pakistani forces — serves U.S. and Pakistani interests. “My hope is that over time, we will be able to demonstrate, to the Pakistanis, that we are a reliable ally that they can count on for the long term,” he said.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 479 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 479

    Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3818) to protect 
    investors by enhancing regulation of public auditors, improving 
corporate governance, overhauling corporate disclosure made pursuant to 
              the securities laws, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 10, 2002

   Ms. Carson of Indiana (for herself and Mr. LaFalce) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3818) to protect 
    investors by enhancing regulation of public auditors, improving 
corporate governance, overhauling corporate disclosure made pursuant to 
              the securities laws, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That immediately upon adoption of this resolution the 
Speaker shall, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House 
resolved into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the 
Union for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3818) to protect investors by 
enhancing regulation of public auditors, improving corporate 
governance, overhauling corporate disclosure made pursuant to the 
securities laws, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill 
shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of 
the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and 
shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial 
Services. After general debate the bill shall be considered for 
amendment under the five-minute rule. The bill shall be considered as 
read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole shall accord priority 
in recognition to Representative LaFalce of New York to offer an 
amendment consisting of the text of H.R. 5070. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and 
report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been 
adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion 
except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2. If the Committee of the Whole rises and reports that it has 
come to no resolution on the bill, then on the next legislative day the 
House shall, immediately after the third daily order of business under 
clause 1 of rule XIV, resolve into the Committee of the Whole for 
further consideration of the bill.
                                 <all>
```
#### Ernesto G. Fabbri, *Trustee, etc., Respondent, v.*Willett C. WARD, *Appellant, Impleaded, etc.*

— Judgment modified as directed in opinion, and affirmed as modified, without costs to either party. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.285 When is a SAP evaluation required? ( a ) As an employee, when you have violated DOT drug and alcohol regulations, you cannot again perform any DOT safety-sensitive duties for any employer until and unless you complete the SAP evaluation, referral, and education/treatment process set forth in this subpart and in applicable DOT agency regulations. The first step in this process is a SAP evaluation.
( b ) For purposes of this subpart, a verified positive DOT drug test result, a DOT alcohol test with a result indicating an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or greater, a refusal to test (including by adulterating or substituting a specimen) or any other violation of the prohibition on the use of alcohol or drugs under a DOT agency regulation constitutes a DOT drug and alcohol regulation violation.
[65 FR 79526, Dec. 19, 2000, as amended at 88 FR 27650, May 2, 2023]
----

(2004/C 84 E/0001)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0021/03

by Vitaliano Gemelli (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(13 January 2003)

Subject:   Appointment of senior staff in the European Commission — medical service

ILO (International Labour Organisation) Recommendation No 112 concerning occupational health services in places of employment establishes, as one of the professional guarantees designed to ensure that there is a relationship of trust between employers, workers and their occupational health service physician, ‘professional and moral independence’ vis-à-vis all those concerned.

In its resolution of 1 July 1960 on safety and hygiene at work the European Parliament recognises that occupational medicine is practised in occupational health services in companies and in the work of occupational physicians.

In its Recommendation of 20 July 1962 on company medical services (1) the Commission calls on the Member States to officially recognise occupational medicine in enterprises, emphasising that these services should preferably be headed, wherever possible, by full-time occupational physicians.

Can the Commission say why it saw fit to ignore the fundamental principles of the ILO recommendation, Parliament's resolution and its own recommendation to the Member States, by appointing an official with no medical knowledge as head of its medical service?

Does the Commission not consider that decisions of this kind may severely harm its credibility in the eyes of the other institutions and European citizens?

Answer given by Mr Kinnock on behalf of the Commission

(14 February 2003)

Contrary to what the Honourable Member appears to have been led to believe by the information at his disposal, the Commission does not disregard any of its own recommendations to the Member States on the importance of occupational health services.

After the previous head of the Medical Service in Brussels retired, the Commission decision in 2002 was taken specifically for the purpose of reinforcing its Medical Service in Brussels by giving greater attention to the management of this service through the appointment of two members of staff to lead it. The post of Unit Head was entrusted to an administrator with proven management experience and a new function of Medical Adviser — with full responsibility for the medical aspects of the service — was created. That post was assigned to a medical doctor with well established and recognised expertise in occupational health matters. The Medical Adviser is not inferior in grade or in status to any person in the Medical Service.

The Commission was assisted in coming to the decision by knowledge of the manner in which hospital management is organised in some Member States.

The Commission is sure that the Honourable Member will want to correct the impression inadvertently given by his question that ‘an official with no medical knowledge’ was appointed by the Commission to head its Medical Service, in contravention of ILO recommendations.

----

(1)  OJ B 80, 31.8.1962, p. 2181.

----
§ 39.5 To whom do the provisions of this part apply? ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) or (c) of this section, this Part applies to you if you are the owner or operator of any passenger vessel, and you are: ( 1 ) A public entity that provides designated public transportation; or
( 2 ) A private entity primarily engaged in the business of transporting people whose operations affect commerce and that provides specified public transportation;
( b ) If you are the PVO of a foreign-flag passenger vessel, this Part applies to you only if your vessel picks up passengers at a port in the United States, its territories, possessions, or commonwealths.
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 29 April 2004

in Case C-102/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Stuttgart): Ingeborg Beuttenmüller v Land Baden-Württemberg (1)

(Freedom of movement for workers - Recognition of diplomas - Directives 89/48/EEC and 92/51/EEC - Primary and secondary school teachers - Holder of a diploma of post-secondary studies of two years' duration - Conditions for the exercise of the profession)

(2004/C 118/32)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-102/02: reference to the Court under Article 234 EC from the Verwaltungsgericht Stuttgart (Germany) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Ingeborg Beuttenmüller and Land Baden-Württemberg — on the interpretation of Council Directive 89/48/EEC of 21 December 1988 on a general system for the recognition of higher-education diplomas awarded on completion of professional education and training of at least three years' duration (OJ 1989 L 19, p. 16) and Council Directive 92/51/EEC of 18 June 1992 on a second general system for the recognition of professional education and training to supplement Directive 89/48 (OJ 1992 L 209, p. 25) — the Court (Fifth Chamber) composed of: P. Jann, acting for the President of the Fifth Chamber, C.W.A. Timmermans, A. Rosas (Rapporteur), A. La Pergola and S. von Bahr, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 29 April 2004, in which it has ruled:

----

(1)  OJ C 144, 15.6.2002.

----
----

Action brought on 9 February 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-49/04)

(2004/C 94/40)

An action against the Kingdom of the Netherlands was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 9 February 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Karen Banks and Wouter Wils, acting as Agents.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The period within which the directive had to be transposed expired on 22 December 2002.

----

(1)OJ 2001 L 167 of 22.6.2001, p. 10.

----
<PAGE>

                     ARTESYN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Entity                                                              Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
<S>                                                                 <C>
Artesyn International Ltd.                                          Cayman Islands
Artesyn North America, Inc.                                         Delaware
Artesyn Netherlands B.V.                                            Netherlands
Artesyn Technologies Communications                                 Wisconsin
Products, Inc.
Artesyn Delaware, Inc.                                              Delaware
Azcore Corporation                                                  Delaware
Artesyn Asset Management, Inc.                                      Delaware
Artesyn Communication Products Investment, Inc.                     Delaware
Artesyn Communication Products, LLC                                 Delaware
Artesyn Delaware LLC                                                Delaware
Real Time Digital, Inc.                                             New Jersey
Artesyn FSC, Inc.                                                   Barbados
Artesyn Austria GmbH                                                Austria
Artesyn Austria GmbH & Co. KG                                       Austria
Artesyn Holding GmbH                                                Austria
Artesyn Technologies Asia Pacific Ltd.                              Hong Kong
Artesyn Ireland Ltd.                                                Cayman Islands
Artesyn Cayman LP                                                   Cayman Islands
Artesyn International Ltd.                                          Cayman Islands
Artesyn Holdings (Ireland) Ltd.                                     Ireland
C.P. Power Products (Zhong Shan) Co., Ltd.                          People's Republic of China
Artesyn (U.K.) Ltd.                                                 United Kingdom
Artesyn Communications Products UK Ltd.                             Scotland
Spider Software Ltd.                                                Scotland
Spider Software, Inc.                                               Massachusetts
Artesyn France S.A.R.L.                                             France
Artesyn Germany GmbH                                                Germany
Artesyn Germany GbR                                                 Germany
Artesyn GmbH & Co. KG                                               Germany
Artesyn Elektronisch Gerate Beteiligungs-und                        Germany
Verwaltungs GmbH
Artesyn Hungary Elektronikai kft                                    Hungary
Artesyn Technologies Intellectual Property                          Hungary
  Licensing Liability Company
Artesyn Energy Systems S.P.A                                        Italy
</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

# Foreign Trade

Skip top of page navigation

###### You are here: Census.gov › Business & Industry ›Foreign Trade › U.S. International Trade Data

                - Main
                - About
                - Data
                - Outreach
                - AES
                - Regulations
                - Reference
                - Definitions
                - Schedule B
                - FAQs

### More DATA

                          - Trade Highlights
                          - Balance by Partner Country
                          - Country/Product Trade
                          - State/Metropolitan Data
                          - Historical Series
                          - Notices and Corrections
                          - Related Party Trade
                          - Press Releases
                          - Data Products

### Important Links

                          - Global Reach Blog
                          - Newsletters
                          - ACE AESDirect
                          Related Sites- Business and Industry
- Briefing Room
- North American Industry                Classification System (NAICS)
Economic Indicator Database
                          Textile Concordance - Monthly SubscriptionDownload a file- Click on the appropriate month below to download your file.
-  If you are having technical difficulties or need help, feel free to email us at eid.international.trade.data@census.gov or call 301-763-2311 for immediate assistance.
- Record	      layouts of the files are  available	      online .
Select Statistical Month:-  January 2019  
-  February 2019 
-  March 2019 
-   April 2019 
-   May 2019 
-   June 2019 
-   July 2019 
-   August 2019 
-   September 2019 
-   October 2019 
-   November 2019 
-   December 2019 

                          Export Training
Collection of videos to enhance export training.

Spanish Language Webinars 2020-2021 (Seminarios en Línea en Español 2020-2021)
2017 And Prior Year Webinars Archive.
Upcoming Outreach Activities
Upcoming Outreach Activities
Contact Us
				Contact the International Trade Macro Analysis Branch: Email us! or use our feedback form!

                  Call us: (301)763-2311 or 1-800-549-0595 option 4			  
CONNECT WITH US**********- Information Quality
- Data Linkage Infrastructure
- Data Protection and Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- FOIA
- Inspector General
- No FEAR Act
- U.S. Department of Commerce
- USA.gov

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
✕Is this page helpful?YesNo✕NO THANKS255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached✕Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions?  Source: U.S. Census Bureau | Foreign Trade |  ftdwebmaster@census.gov |     Last Revised:  June 17, 2022
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 523

Recognizing the contributions of historically Black colleges and universities

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 11, 2002

Mr. WATTS of Oklahoma (for himself and Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of

Texas) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and the Workforce

RESOLUTION

Recognizing the contributions of historically Black colleges

and universities

Whereas there are 105 historically Black colleges and universities in the United States;

Whereas historically Black colleges and universities provide

the quality education so essential to full participation in

a complex, highly technological society;

Whereas historically Black colleges and universities have a

rich heritage and have played a prominent role in American history;

Whereas historically Black colleges and universities have allowed many students to attain their full potential through

higher education;
2

•HRES 523 IH

Whereas the achievements and goals of historically Black colleges and universities are deserving of national recognition; and

Whereas the third week in September is an appropriate time

to express that recognition: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. RECOGNITION OF HISTORICALLY BLACK COL3 LEGES AND UNIVERSITIES.

4 The House of Representatives—

5 (1) recognizes the significance of historically

6 Black colleges and universities;

7 (2) recognizes that historically Black colleges

8 and universities have been educating students for

9 more than 100 years;

10 (3) commends the Nation’s historically Black

11 colleges and universities for their commitment to

12 academic excellence for all students, including low13 income and educationally disadvantaged students;

14 (4) urges the presidents, faculty, and staff of

15 the Nation’s historically Black colleges and univer16 sities to continue their efforts to recruit, retain, and

17 graduate students who might otherwise not pursue a

18 postsecondary education;

19 (5) recognizes the significance of title III of the

20 Higher Education Act, which aids in strengthening

21 the academic quality, institutional management, and
3

•HRES 523 IH

1 financial stability of historically Black colleges and

2 universities; and

3 (6) requests that the President issue a procla4 mation calling on the people of the United States

5 and interested groups to demonstrate support for

6 historically Black colleges and universities in the

7 United States during that week with appropriate

8 ceremonies, activities, and programs.

Æ
#### Cora D. Thompson, Respondent, *v.*Standard Fashion Company, Appellant.

*Thompson*v. *Standard Fashion Co.,*128 App. Div. 926, affirmed.

(Argued April 3, 1911;

decided April 25, 1911.)

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of theAppellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 30, 1908, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through the defendant’s negligence.

*Herbert Noble*for appellant.

*Harold Nathan*and *Meyer Greenburg*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
# UK, U.S. Naval Forces Conduct Mine Countermeasures Exercise

/ Published Dec. 14, 2020
NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY BAHRAIN, 
Royal Navy and U.S. Navy forces participated in mine countermeasures (MCM) interoperability training in the Arabian Gulf, Dec. 9-12.This is the latest in a series of MCM exercises between regional and coalition partners, meant to enhance mine hunting and communications interoperability. The previous iteration in November involved Saudi, UK and U.S. MCM forces."This latest exercise provided our combined MCM force with yet another opportunity to practice cohesion, communication, coordination and competency,” said UK Royal Navy Captain Don Crosbie, deputy commander of Task Force 52. “We will continue to regularly hone these crucial defensive skills alongside our partner navies in support of regional maritime security.”Participating mine countermeasures ships included the UK Royal Navy HMS Chiddingfold (M 37), HMS Shoreham (M 112) and U.S. Navy USS Dextrous (MCM 13). A MH-53E Sea Dragon attached to Helicopter Mine Countermeasures Squadron 15 provided aerial mine hunting support.The U.S. and UK have conducted MCM exercises together as a combined force since 2003.