alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ NO. 09
- 20
- 00030
- CR

__________________ SOPHIA PEREZ HEATH, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 9th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 19
- 01
- 00864
- CR

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pursu ant to a plea bargain agreement, in which the State agreed to cap her punishment at twenty years of confinement, appellant Sophia Perez Heath pleaded guilty to aggravated kidnapping. After conducting an evidentiary sentencing hearing, the trial judge found Heath guilty and imposed a sentence of twenty years of confinement. Heath’s appellate counsel filed an Anders brief that presents counsel’s professional evaluation of the record and concludes that the appeal is frivolous. See2 Anders v. California , 386 U .S. 738 (1967); High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). Heath filed a pro se brief in response. The Court of Criminal Appeals has held that we need not address the merits of issues raised in Anders briefs

or pro se responses. Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826

- 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Rather, an appellate court may determine either: (1) “that the appeal is wholly frivolous and issue an opinion explaining that it has reviewed the record and finds no reversible error [;] ” or (2) “that a rguable grounds for appeal exist and remand the cause to the trial court so that new counsel may be appointed to brief the issues.” Id. We have determined that this appeal is wholly frivolous. We reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel’s conclusion that no arguable issues support the appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re

- brief the appeal. Cf. Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court’s judgment. 1
AFFIRMED.

_________________________ W. SCOTT GOLEMON Chief Justice Submitted on February 3, 2021 Opinion Delivered March 3, 2021 Do Not Publish Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

1 Heath may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
H. Res. 36

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 14, 2001.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 554) to establish a program, coordinated by the

National Transportation Safety Board, of assistance to families of passengers involved in rail passenger accidents. The

first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one

hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. After general debate the bill shall

be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule.

Each section of the bill shall be considered as read. During

consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the

Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition

on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment

has caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congres-
2

•HRES 36 EH

sional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule

XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read.

At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment

the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with

such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Initial Review Group; Career Development Facilitating The Transition to Independence Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         October 23-24, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Joshua Park, Ph.D.,  Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, RM: 2W200, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-6208,                         *joshua.park4@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 16, 2023.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-17964 Filed 8-18-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
§ 552.3 General. Any interested person may file with the Administrator a petition requesting him: ( a ) To commence a proceeding respecting the issuance, amendment or revocation of a motor vehicle safety standard, or
( b ) To commence a proceeding to decide whether to issue an order concerning the notification and remedy of a failure of a motor vehicle or item of replacement equipment to comply with an applicable motor vehicle safety standard or a defect in such vehicle or equipment that relates to motor vehicle safety.
[60 FR 17267, Apr. 5, 1995]
#### George D. Turner, Respondent, v. The City of Newburgh, Appellant.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Pratt, J.
H. Res. 398

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 1, 2002.

Whereas fragile X is the most common inherited cause of

mental retardation, affecting people of every race, income

level, and nationality;

Whereas 1 in every 267 women is a carrier of the fragile X;

Whereas children born with fragile X typically require a lifetime of special care at a cost of over $2,000,000 each;

Whereas fragile X frequently remains undetected because the

defect was relatively recently discovered and there is a

lack of awareness about the disease, even within the medical community;

Whereas the gene causing fragile X has been discovered and

is easily identified by testing;

Whereas inquiry into fragile X is a powerful research model

for neuropsychiatric disorders, such as autism, schizophrenia, pervasive developmental disorders, and other

forms of X-chromosome-linked mental retardation;

Whereas individuals with fragile X can provide a homogeneous research population for advancing the understanding of neuropsychiatric disorders;

Whereas with concerted research efforts, a cure for fragile X

may be developed;
2

•HRES 398 EH

Whereas fragile X research, both basic and applied, has been

vastly underfunded despite the prevalence of the disorder,

the potential for the development of a cure, the established benefits of available treatments and interventions,

and the significance that fragile X research has for related disorders;

Whereas Members of Congress are in unique positions to help

raise public awareness about the need for increased funding for research and early diagnosis and treatment for

fragile X; and

Whereas throughout the United States, families and friends

of individuals with fragile X have designated October 5

as National Fragile X Research Day to promote efforts

to find a treatment and cure for fragile X: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) recognizes the devastating impact of fragile X

on thousands of people in the United States and their

families;

(2) calls on the National Institutes of Health, the

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and other

sources of Federal and private research funds to enhance

and increase their efforts and commitments to fragile X

research;

(3) calls on medical schools and other health educators, medical societies and associations, and Federal,

State, and local health care facilities to promote research

that will lead to a treatment and cure for fragile X; and
3

•HRES 398 EH

(4) commends the goals and ideals of a National

Fragile X Research Day and supports interested groups

in conducting appropriate ceremonies, activities, and

programs to demonstrate support for such a day.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32





Certification of Periodic Report by the Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to, and for purposes only of, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) the Quarterly Report of Shore Bancshares, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Shore Bancshares, Inc.





Date: May 9, 2011
By:
/s/ W. Moorhead VermilyeW. Moorhead VermilyeChief Executive Officer





Date: May 9, 2011
By:
/s/ Susan E. LeavertonSusan E. Leaverton, CPATreasurer/Principal Accounting Officer
In-Person Attendees: The Ceiling Fan & Ceiling Fan Light Kits TPMeeting Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2014NameTitleOrganizationStreetCity State ZipBrookman, Douglas FacilitatorPublic Solutions, Inc.108 Newburg Avenue Baltimore MD 21228Brundage. P.E., DonaldM.Principal EngineerMarketing ResearchSouthern Company Services, Inc. Bin 10206 241 Ralph McGillBoulevard NEAtlanta GA 30308Desroches, Louis-Benoit Program Manager Lawrence Berkeley NationalLaboratory (LBNL)1 Cyclotron Road, Mailstop90R4000Berkeley CA 94720DiMascio, Marianne Outreach Director Appliance Standards AwarenessProject (ASAP)231 BroadwayHanover MA 02339Flannery, TimExecutive Vice PresidentSalesMinka Group1151 West Bradford Court Corona CA 92882Frampton, Nathan PresidentFanimation10983 Bennett Parkway Zionsville IN 46077Gatto, DaveManager of ProductCompliance and QualityControl (U.S.)Westinghouse Lighting12401 McNulty RoadPhiladelphiaPA19154-1029Jasinski, Samuel A. ConsultantNavigant Consulting, Inc.77 South Bedford Street Burlington MA 01803Kantner, Colleen N/ALawrence Berkeley NationalLaboratory (LBNL)One Cyclotron Road, MailStop: 90R4000Berkeley CA 94720Kumar, Mythri V. N/ANavigant Consulting, Inc.1200 19th Street NW, Suite700Washington DC 20036Linstone, ClarkPresidentPacific Coast Lighting20250 Plummer Street Chatsworth CA 91311Marantan, PhD, Aris Associate Director Navigant Consulting, Inc.1200 19th Street, NW, Suite500Washington DC 20036Mathis, KentDirector of Marketing HKC3059 Forest Hill Irene Road,Suite 103Germantown TN 38138McGowan, Terry Director of Engineering American Lighting Association 3559 BirchtreeClevelandHeightsOH 44121Medepalli, Sarah A. ICF international Senior Associate1725 Eye Street, NW Suite1000Washington DC 20006Noll, ElizabethEnergy EfficiencyAdvocateNatural Resources Defense Council(NRDC)1152 15th Street, NW, Suite300Washington DC 20005Pierce, JulieN/ANavigant Consulting, Inc.1801 K Street, NW, Suite500WashingtonDC20006-1301Smith, VanAssociateVan Ness Feldman LLP1050 Thomas JeffersonStreet NW #700WashingtonDC20007-3877Thompson, Janie Wise Senior Associate Cassidy & Thompson733 Tenth Street, NW, Suite400Washington DC 20001In-Person Attendees: The Ceiling Fan & Ceiling Fan Light Kits TPMeeting Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2014Name Title Organization Street City State ZipTurner, DavidProduct MarketingManager, Ceiling FansHunter Fan Company7130 Goodlett Farms Pkwy,Ste 400Memphis TN 38016Upton, Richard D. President, CEO American Lighting Association World Trade CenterP.O. Box 420288DallasTX75342-0288Walker, BillSr. Engineering Manager Hunter Fan Co.7130 Goodlett Farms Prkwy,Ste 400Memphis TN 38016Weems, Michael Vice President,Governement AffairsAmerican Lighting Association 2050 N.Stemmons Freeway,Unit 100Dallas TX 75207
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1084.html[7/22/2015 7:42:37 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-h90u

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1084

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Gary Gordon

Address:

PO Box 406

Creston, CA, 93432

Email: docandlugordon@gmail.com

Phone: 8054609112

General Comment

Keep the damn government out of my life. Dictator Oboma needs to keep his filthy dictatorship out of my life

 and out of my retirement. Gary E Gordon DVM
§ 25.100 Purpose of this part. This part provides guidance to Federal agencies that: ( a ) The unique entity identifier (UEI) is the universal identifier for Federal financial assistance applicants, as well as recipients and their direct subrecipients (first-tier subrecipients), and;
( b ) The System for Award Management (*SAM.gov*) is the repository for standard information about applicants and recipients.
#### § 821.60 Definitions.

As used in this subpart:

*Board decisional employee* means a Board Member, law judge or other employee who is, or who may reasonably be expected to be, involved in the decisional process of the proceeding;

*Ex parte communication* means an oral or written communication not on the public record with respect to which reasonable prior notice to all parties is not given, but does not include requests for status reports on any matter or proceeding covered by this part.
Order filed February 12, 2015 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00062-CV

____________

IRENE SILVA AND DAVID SILVA, Appellants

V.

THE CITY OF PASADENA, Appellees

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-36912

O R D E R

This is an appeal from a judgment signed October 10, 2014. The notice of 

appeal was due January 8, 2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant, however, 

filed his notice of appeal on January 9, 2015, a date within 15 days of the due date 

for the notice of appeal. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied

when the perfecting instrument is filed within fifteen days of its due date. Verburgt 

v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant did not file a motion to 

extend time to file the notice of appeal. While an extension may be implied, 
appellant is still obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to 

support the late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd., 974 

S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.CHouston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.). 

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to 

file the notice of appeal on or before 10 days after the date of this order. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 26.3;10.5(b). If appellant does not comply with this order, we will 

dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM
# US, Saudi bilateral maritime exercise begins 

/ Published Feb. 27, 2020
JUBAIL, SAUDI ARABIA (NNS), 

                JUBAIL, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 200223-N-JO908-1040Lt. Cmdr. Jorge Roldan, commanding officer of Task Unit 56.7.5, right, explains the capabilities of the Mark VI patrol boat to Vice Adm. Jim Malloy, commander, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command, U.S. 5th Fleet, Combined Maritime Forces, left, and Vice Adm. Fahad al Ghofaily, Commander of the Royal Saudi Naval Forces (RSNF), during an underway in Jubail, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia as part of exercise Nautical Defender 20 (ND) Feb. 23. ND is a bilateral maritime exercise between the U.S. Navy and the RSNF designed to build and sustain warfighting capabilities, support long term regional security and enhance military-to-military interoperability with the U.S. and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Kory Alsberry)            

                US, Saudi Arabia participate in Nautical Defender 20            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: MC1 Alsberry

VIRIN: 200223-N-JO908-1040
#### § 585.22 Purpose.

The purpose of these reporting requirements is to assist the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in determining whether a manufacturer has complied with the Type 2 seat belt requirements for rear seating positions of Standard No. 208.
### In The C ou rt o f A p p ea ls Si x t h Appe l l at e Di st r i c t o f Te x as a t Te x ar ka na

______________________________ No s. 06 -0 8- 00 12 0- CR & 06 -0 8- 00 12 1- CR

______________________________ SANTI AGO TEL L EZ ROSAL ES, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appea l from the 8th J udicial District Court

Hopkins County , Texas Trial Court Nos. 0417619 & 0417620

B e f o r e M o r r i s s , C
. J. , C a

rt e r a n d M o s e l e y , JJ.2 O R D E R Santiag o Tellez Rosales appea ls from his convictions of indece ncy with a child and criminal attempt-sexual assault of a c hild. Rosales' se ntence was imposed May 24, 2006. The Te x as Court of Criminal Appea ls gr anted out-of-time appeals, and Rosales' notices of a ppeal we re f

iled J une 16, 20 08 . T he c le rk ' s re c or ds we re fi le d July 23 , 20 08 , a nd , a ft e r a sh ow -c a us e he a ri ng by thi s Co ur

t, the re porter' s rec ord was filed in the se companion case s on J anuar y 27, 2009. Due to the de ath of appellant' s counsel' s father and counse l's ow n illness, we gr anted ex traordina ry extensions of ti me, and counsel filed Rosales' brief on J uly 13, 2009. The State' s brief w as there fore due on or be fore Aug ust 12, 2009. The Court g rante d an ex tension of thirty day s, making the brief

due September

11, 2009. When no brief ha d been r ece ived by this Court by September 23, and being awa re that the assistant district attorney Samantha C rouch (the attorney of record for t he State in this case) had lef t the employ

of the Hopkins County

District Attorney ' s Offic e, our c lerk' s o ff i ce called the district attorney ' s office and lef

t a messag e. To date, that messag e has not been returne d, and neither a brie f nor a motion to ext end time to file the brie f has be en re ceive d. We n ow o rder Mar tin

B ra dd y , d ist ri c t a tto rn e y

of Ho pk ins County , to fi le , o r t o c a us e his desig nee to f

ile, a brie f, to be re ceive d by this Court on or before October 20, 2009.3

I T I S SO ORDERED.

B Y T HE CO UR T Date: September 29, 2009
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

Department of Energy and Environment 

December 28, 2015 

Shawn M. Garvin 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region III (Mail Code: 3RAOO) 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 

Subject:	 District ofColumbia's Infrastructure SIP Revision for the 2012 Fine Particulate 

Matter Standards 

Dear Mr. Garvin: 

Pursuant to the authority set forth in Sections 5 and 6 of the District of Columbia Air Pollution 

Control Act of 1984, effective March 15, 1985, as amended (D.C. Law 5-165; D.C. Official 

Code §§ 8-101.05 and 8-101.06 (2012 Repl. & 2015 Supp.)); Sections 107(4) and 110 ofthe 

District Department of the Environment Establishment Act of2005, effective February 15,2006 

(D.C. Law 16-51; D.C. Official Code §§ 8-151.07(4) and 8-151.10 (2012 Repl. & 2015 Supp.)); 

Mayor's Order 2006-61, dated June 14,2006; and Mayor's Order 2015-191, dated July 23,2015, 

the District of Columbia (District) is hereby requesting approval of a revision to its State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted in accordance with the requirements of 40 C.F.R. Part 51. 

The District is requesting approval ofthis SIP revision to meet certain federal Clean Air Act 

requirements under Section 110(a)(2). The SIP revision describes how the District is 

implementing the "infrastructure" elements for the 2012 fine particulate matter (PM2.s) national 

ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). 

A Notice of Public Hearing and Public Comment Period was posted in the D.C. Register on 

November 20,2015 (62 DCR 015109, Notice ID 5739604). 

The following are included with this SIP submittal package: 

•	 One paper copy ofthe Infrastructure SIP submittal for the 2012 PM2.s NAAQS; 

•	 Public hearing notice; 

•	 Hearing officer's certification; 

•	 One paper copy ofthe D.C. Official Code § 8-101.05 (2015) as a reference; 

•	 One paper copy ofthe D.C. Official Code § 8-101.05a to § 8-101.05g (2015) as a 

reference; 

•	 One paper copy ofthe D.C. Official Code § 8-101.06 (2015) as a reference; 

•	 One paper copy ofthe D.C. Official Code § 8-151.07 (2015) as a reference; 

•	 One disk containing an electronic version of the SIP revision. The electronic version 

includes an exact duplicate ofthe paper copy of the SIP revision submittal. 

WEARE

* * *

* * *

DEPARTM ENT ---------------------------- wlSHilJGTOA 

=:O~ ENERGY & .	 . ENVIRONMENT 1200 First Street NE, 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20002 I (202) 535-2600 I doee.dc.gov oc 
Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (202) 535­

2615, or Ms. Cecily Beall, Associate Director for the Air Quality Division, at (202) 535-2626. 

Director 

Enclosure 

cc:	 Diana Esher, Director, Air Protection Division, EPA Region 3 

Cecily Beall, Associate Director, Air Quality Division, DDOE 

Page 2 of 2
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 387

Providing for the expulsion of Representative James A. Traficant, Jr., from

the House of Representatives.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 16, 2002

Mr. SENSENBRENNER submitted the following resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct

RESOLUTION

Providing for the expulsion of Representative James A.

Traficant, Jr., from the House of Representatives.

1 Resolved, That, pursuant to article I, section 5, clause

2 2 of the United States Constitution, Representative James

3 A. Traficant, Jr., be, and he hereby is expelled, from the

4 House of Representatives.

Æ