alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION                                                      Exhibit 31.1

I, Martin A. Roenigk, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CompuDyne Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the period presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and I,  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and  procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially  affected,  or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's   auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of  registrant's  board  of
directors:

         (a) All significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal  control over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that  involves  management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

         Date:  April 10, 2007
                                        /s/ Martin Roenigk
                                        -----------------------
                                        Martin Roenigk
                                        Chief Executive Officer




                                       76
§ 89.43 Review within the Department. ( a ) *Notification by debtor.* A debtor who receives a Notice of Intent may present, for 60 days from the date of the Notice of Intent, information that all or part of the debt is not past-due or legally enforceable. (However, this does not extend the regulatory period for submitting written statements or for requesting an administrative hearing on the merits of an alleged violation, nor does it extend the period to appeal an assessed civil penalty.) To comply with this procedure, the debtor must: ( 1 ) Send a written request for a review of the information to the address provided in the notice.
( 2 ) State in the request the amount disputed and the reasons why the debtor believes that the debt is not past-due or legally enforceable.
( 3 ) Include in the request any documents which the debtor wishes to be considered or state that additional information will be submitted within the remainder of the 60 day period.
( b ) *Submission of information.* The debtor may submit information showing that all or part of the debt is not past-due or not legally enforceable along with the notification required by paragraph (a) of this section. Failure to submit the information within the remainder of the 60 day period will be interpreted as there is no additional information for consideration.
( c ) *Review of the information.* The Department considers all available information related to the issue of whether the debt is past-due and the issue of whether the debt is legally enforceable. After a decision has been reached, the Department notifies the debtor whether the Department has sustained amended, or cancelled its determination that the debt is past-due and legally enforceable.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

 

I, William W. Krippaehne, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of Fisher Communications, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fisher Communications, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: September 12, 2003 

 

/s/William W. Krippaehne, Jr.

William W. Krippaehne, Jr. 

President and Chief Executive Officer
# AFCENT strengthens capabilities, demonstrates regional commitment through ACE capstone event 

/ Published Dec. 23, 2021
AL UDEID AIR BASE, Qatar, 
Ninth Air Force (U.S. Air Forces Central) and coalition partners conducted its most comprehensive joint and multinational Agile Combat Employment-focused operation to date at an expeditionary location and various established installations across U.S. Central Command’s area of responsibility, Dec. 17-22, 2021.

The ACE capstone event leveraged Airmen and assets in the region to enhance theater airpower competencies, validating operational capabilities, command and control, logistics and sustainment, while simultaneously strengthening regional partnerships.

“AFCENT’s operations continue to evolve as our command remains focused on 21st-century threats within the CENTCOM area of responsibility,” said U.S. Air Force Lt. Gen. Greg Guillot, commander, 9th AF (AFCENT). “Increasingly, our presence is shaped by how we effectively deploy, employ and redeploy personnel, equipment and aircraft throughout the theater, integrate as a joint and coalition force, and strengthen relationships with host nation partners. This latest ACE capstone event successfully brought all of those elements together and serves as a demonstration of our capabilities and commitment to the region.”

While the command is continually refining its approach to ACE, this latest capstone effort built on lessons learned from across the U.S. Air Force and within the command, and was remarkable in the number of joint, coalition and partner nations involved across the AOR, according to U.S. Air Force Maj. Miles Blocker, who served as lead planner for the operation.

Throughout, Airmen strengthened a variety of skills, to include: employing agile airlift in the mobilization and deployment to various locations, conducting hot-pit refueling and crew-swap operations, establishing dynamic command and control, executing combat search and rescue operations, and integrating partner nations into ground and flying operations.
#### § 555.15 Time period for exemptions.

Subject to § 555.16, each temporary exemption granted by the Administrator under this subpart shall be in effect for a period of three years from the effective date. The Administrator shall identify each exemption by a unique number.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                          35,851
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   89,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,703
<INVENTORY>                                     65,992
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               208,103
<PP&E>                                         232,804
<DEPRECIATION>                                 124,940
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 409,225
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          122,959
<BONDS>                                        108,533
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     21,531
<COMMON>                                        14,270
<OTHER-SE>                                      94,611
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   409,225
<SALES>                                        576,449
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               576,449
<CGS>                                          433,606
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  433,606
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   561
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 49,310
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,503
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             32,807
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,807
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.90
        

</TABLE>
N. Y. MARINE COURT.

#### Anthony Taylor agt. Charles Reed.

*Attachment—Oode of OivU Procedure, section 636—what affidavit must . . contain.*

In an action for breach of contract, the affidavit, to entitle a party to an attachment under section 635 of the Code of Civil Procedure, is defective where it states the amount of plaintiff’s demand, but fails to allege that he is entitled thereto “ *over and above aM counter-claims known to him,”*as required by section 636, subdivision 2.

*Special*Term,, October, 1877.

The plaintiff commenced an action in the marine court against the defendant to recover $773 on a contract, and procured an attachment, under which the sheriff seized a number of horses now at Jerome park race track, the property of defendant. The defendant moved to vacate the attachment for alleged irregularities in the original papers.

Mo Adam, *J.*

The attachment was granted under section 635 of the Oode of Civil Procedure, in an action for breach of contract. The affidavit upon which it was granted states the amount of the plaintiff’s demand, but fails to allege that he is entitled thereto “ over and above all counter-claims known to him,” as required by section 636. The provision in question is new and must be held to have been inserted for a purpose, and effect cannot be givén to it without holding the present affidavit defective. The conclusion that the omission in the affidavit is fatal would seem clear upon principle; but all doubt upon the subject is put at rest by the decision of the *28Albany general term of the supreme court in *Kelly*agt. *Archer*(48 *Barb.,*68), in which that court, in construing a similar provision applicable to justices’ .courts, held that where -the affidavit upon which the attachment was issued did not specify an indebtedness “over and above all discounts,” as required by the Revised Statutes (2 *R. S.,*230, *sec.*28), the attachment was void; that the provision as to discounts was .an essential part of the affidavit, and the court remarked, “ as it was, there may have been an offset to the demand, and the balance may have been the other way.” For the omission aforesaid, the motion to vacate the attachment herein must be granted.
----

(2004/C 84 E/0547)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1671/03

by Bartho Pronk (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(19 May 2003)

Subject:   Follow-up question to question E-3529/02 on statutory regulation of holiday pay

In its answer to Written Question E-3529/02 (1), the Commission states that Belgian legislation defers the actual exercise of entitlement to annual leave to the following calendar year. The Commission considers that this is in accordance with Article 7 of Directive 93/104/EC (2). However, the Article in question expressly states that every (!) worker is entitled to paid annual (!) leave of at least four weeks. In COM(2000) 787 the Commission itself notes that workers cannot take any paid leave during the first year of their employment. The only conclusion that may be drawn from this is that not all workers are entitled to paid annual leave in Belgium, as is explicitly required under Directive 93/104/EC. Article 7(2) of the Directive expressly states that the minimum period of paid annual leave may not be replaced by an allowance in lieu. That means that it is not possible to derogate from paragraph 1.

Answer given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(20 June 2003)

----

(1)OJ C 137 E, 12.6.2003, p. 222.

(2)OJ L 307, 13.12.1993, p. 18.

(3)OJ C 137 E, 12.6.2003, p. 222.

(4)  See the judgment of the European Court of Justice of 26 June 2001 in case C-l73/99.

----
Date: August 15 , 2012

To: Terri Plumb

Regulations Development Group OSORA From: Jy

me Schafer Director Division of Medical and Surgical Services Coverage and Anal ys is Group Office of Clinical Standards and Quality Subject: Rulemaking Record for CMS
- 15 90
- P: Medi care Program; Pay ment Policies under the Ph ys ician Fee Schedule , DME Face
- to - Face Encounters, Elimination of the Requirement for Termination of Non
- random Prepay ment Complex Medical Review, and Other Revisions to Part B for CY 2013 I certify that t o the best of my

knowledge , the attached informati on includes all material that **Division of Medical and Surgical Services, Coverage and Analysis Group, OCSQ**  considered , or had before it in developing the above
- referenced ru l e. I have identified any proprietary data or confidential information that should not be released to the public upon a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Attached is an index of all material included
.**Index of Supporting Information for:** 

CMS
- 15 90
- P: Medi care Program; Pay ment Policies under the Ph ys ician Fee Schedule , DME Face
- to - Face Encounters, Elimination of the Requirement for Termination of Non
random Prepay

ment Complex Medical Review, and Other Revisions to Part B for

CY 2013 Title of Document Does this document contain confidential information or proprietary data? 1. Morbidity

and Mortality

Weekl y Report , December 23, 2011, Vol. 60, No. 50. “Use of Hepatitis B Vaccination for Adults with Dia

betes Mellitus: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)” No.

2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1015.html[7/22/2015 6:38:02 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-uh5n

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1015

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Mary Anonymous

General Comment

I don't need or want any government agency to have any say over how I spend my retirement funds or 401

 accounts! I worked hard for over 43 years and I certainly don't need any government agency intruding in the

 way I handle my money or life!
#### § 601.31 Adoption of final rules.

Final rules are prepared by representatives of the office concerned and the Office of Chief Counsel. The rule is then submitted to the Administrator for his/her consideration. If the Administrator adopts the rule, it is published in the Federal Register, unless all persons subject to it are named and are personally served a copy of it.
International Maritime Security Construct Holds Change of Command
 
  By International Maritime Security Construct Public Affairs
  The International Maritime Security Construct (IMSC) held a change of command ceremony onboard Naval Support Activity Bahrain, Feb. 20. Royal Navy Commodore Andrew Canale assumed command of IMSC from Royal Navy Commodore Peter Laughton. IMSC is a 12-nation international coalition that monitors merchant shipping through key regional maritime chokepoints. Canale also assumed command of IMSC’s Coalition Task Force (CTF) Sentinel from Royal Saudi Naval Forces Commodore Saleh Aloufi. CTF Sentinel is the operational task force for IMSC. IMSC was formed in July 2019 in response to increased threats to freedom of navigation for merchant mariners transiting international waters in the Middle East. CTF Sentinel was established four months later. “It has been a real pleasure to lead you as we’ve developed IMSC and fought hard to deliver our mission in a rapidly changing strategic environment,” Laughton told the assembled IMSC members during the ceremony. “Your dedication, commitment to the mission, and good humor has made my time as your commander such a memorable experience.” Canale takes command from Laughton after serving two years at the Royal Navy’s Fleet Operational Standards and Training center in Portsmouth, United Kingdom. Canale has commanded three surface vessels during his career, and has served as an equerry to Her Majesty The Queen. “It is an incredible privilege to assume command of IMSC and CTF Sentinel at such a dynamic time,” said Canale. “Together with our partners, we will do our utmost to show presence where it is needed, and to reassure the merchant shipping community of our commitment to peace and security in the global commons.” Headquartered in Bahrain, IMSC promotes collaboration among member nations to deter threats and reassure regional mariners in and around the Strait of Hormuz and Bab al-Mandeb. Its operational task force, CTF Sentinel, monitors maritime activity in the region. Current members include Albania, Bahrain, Estonia, Jordan, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Seychelles, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom and United States.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 13, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-51664 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus IVAN MENDOZA-CHAVEZ, also known as Daniel Quirarte, also known as Jesus Cabrera-Montalvo, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-1427-1

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Ivan MendozaChavez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
H. Res. 404

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 2, 2002.

Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on the

legislative day of Thursday, May 2, 2002, for the Speaker to

entertain a motion that the House suspend the rules relating

to the resolution (H. Res. 392) expressing solidarity with

Israel in its fight against terrorism. If the Speaker entertains

such motion, debate under clause 1(c) of rule XV shall be extended to one hour.

Attest:

Clerk.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 285

Commending President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan for his leadership and

friendship and welcoming him to the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 8, 2001

Mr. PITTS (for himself and Mr. BONIOR) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

RESOLUTION

Commending President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan for

his leadership and friendship and welcoming him to the

United States.

Whereas President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan has taken

important steps in cooperating with the United States in

combatting terrorism;

Whereas the war against terrorism underscores the importance of increasing the historic bilateral relationship between the United States and Pakistan;

Whereas President Musharraf has pursued the return of

Pakistan to democracy and civil society;

Whereas President Musharraf has shown great fortitude in

confronting extremists in Pakistan; and
2

•HRES 285 IH

Whereas the Pakistani-American community in the United

States and people-to-people diplomacy between the citizens of the United States and Pakistan play an important role in building bridges between the two nations:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives com2 mends President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan for his

3 leadership and friendship and welcomes him to the United

4 States.

Æ