alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 604.47 Remedies. ( a ) If the Chief Counsel determines that a violation of this part occurred, he or she may take one or more of the following actions: ( 1 ) Bar the recipient from receiving future Federal financial assistance from FTA;
( 2 ) Order the withholding of a reasonable percentage of available Federal financial assistance; or
( 3 ) Pursue suspension and debarment of the recipient, its employees, or its contractors.
( b ) In determining the type and amount of remedy, the Chief Counsel shall consider the following factors: ( 1 ) The nature and circumstances of the violation;
( 2 ) The extent and gravity of the violation (“extent of deviation from regulatory requirements”);
( 3 ) The revenue earned (“economic benefit”) by providing the charter service;
( 4 ) The operating budget of the recipient;
( 5 ) Such other matters as justice may require; and
( 6 ) Whether a recipient provided service described in a cease and desist order after issuance of such order by the Chief Counsel.
( c ) The Chief Counsel office may mitigate the remedy when the recipient can document corrective action of alleged violation. The Chief Counsel's decision to mitigate a remedy shall be determined on the basis of how much corrective action was taken by the recipient and when it was taken. Systemic action to prevent future violations will be given greater consideration than action simply to remedy violations identified during FTA's inspection or identified in a complaint.
( d ) In the event the Chief Counsel finds a pattern of violations, the remedy ordered shall bar a recipient from receiving Federal transit assistance in an amount that the Chief Counsel considers appropriate.
( e ) The Chief Counsel may make a decision to withhold Federal financial assistance in a lump sum or over a period of time not to exceed five years.
Exhibit 21.1

As of December 31, 2008, the Company had the following active subsidiaries:



|                                                                   |  |                       
|------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------
|                                                                   |  | State of Incorporation
|Wholly-owned subsidiaries of Comprehensive Care Corporation:       |  |                       
|                                                                   | 
|Comprehensive Behavioral Care, Inc.                                |  | Nevada                
|                                                                   | 
|Wholly-owned subsidiaries of Comprehensive Behavioral Care, Inc.:  |  |                       
|                                                                   | 
|Comprehensive Care Integration, Inc.                               |  | Delaware              
|Comprehensive Behavioral Care of Connecticut, Inc.                 |  | Florida               
|Healthcare Management Services, Inc.                               |  | Michigan              
|CompCare of Pennsylvania, Inc.                                     |  | Nevada                
|                                                                   | 
|Affiliates sponsored by Comprehensive Behavioral Care, Inc.:       |  |                       
|                                                                   | 
|Comprehensive Provider Networks of Texas, Inc.                     |  | Texas                 
|                                                                   | 
|Majority owned subsidiaries of Comprehensive Behavioral Care, Inc. |  |                       
|                                                                   | 
|CompCare de Puerto Rico, Inc.                                      |  | Puerto Rico           



90
H. Res. 386

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 11, 2002.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3762) to amend title

I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide additional

protections to participants and beneficiaries in individual account plans from excessive investment in employer securities

and to promote the provision of retirement investment advice

to workers managing their retirement income assets, and to

amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prohibit insider trades during any suspension of the ability of plan participants or beneficiaries to direct investment away from equity securities of the plan sponsor. The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. In lieu of the amendment recommended by the Committee on Education and the Workforce now printed in the bill, the amendment in the nature

of a substitute printed in part A of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be consid-
2

•HRES 386 EH

ered as adopted. All points of order against the bill, as

amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further

amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) two hours of debate on the bill, as amended,

equally divided among and controlled by the chairmen and

ranking minority members of the Committees on Education

and the Workforce and Ways and Means; (2) the further

amendment printed in part B of the report of the Committee

on Rules, if offered by Representative George Miller of California or Representative Rangel of New York or a designee,

which shall be in order without intervention of any point of

order, shall be considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the

proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit

with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 15 to Form 10-QSB



                                   Exhibit 15

                           ROBERT N. CLEMONS, CPA, PA
                                   PO BOX 1670
                           DELAND, FLORIDA 32721-1670


To The Board of Directors
Cornerstone Ministries Investments, Inc.


I am aware of the use of my report on unaudited  interim  financial  information
dated  October 27, 2004 in the 10-QSB for  Cornerstone  Ministries  Investments,
Inc.





  /S/ ROBERT N. CLEMONS, CPA, PA                             November 10, 2004
---------------------------------
      Robert N. Clemons, CPA, PA
#### John Egan, Respondent, *v.*The Mosler Safe Company, Appellant.

*Egan*v. *Mosler Safe Co.,*134 App. Div. 920, affirmed.

(Argued April 27, 1911;

decided May 16, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November!, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant, his employer.

*Allan E. Brosmith, Joseph F. Murray*and *Frank V. Johnson*for appellant.

*Eugene F. McKinley*and *Charles D. Millard*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF LOSS AND ACCUMULATED DEFICIT AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE  TO SUCH 10QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JULY 31, 1997.
       
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,135
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,135
<PP&E>                                             300
<DEPRECIATION>                                      15
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,420
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               65
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      8,000
<COMMON>                                         1,935
<OTHER-SE>                                      (5,580)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,420
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,112
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,112)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,112)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 512 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 512

            Honoring the Indian American Friendship Council.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 2002

Mr. Pallone (for himself and Mr. Brown of Ohio) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International 
                               Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
            Honoring the Indian American Friendship Council.

Whereas the Indian American Friendship Council was founded in January 1990 with 
        a commitment to promoting relations between the United States and India, 
        the two largest democracies in the world;
Whereas since its inception, the Indian American Friendship Council has been 
        successful in carrying out its mission of improving United States-India 
        relations, supporting developing countries, promoting global democracy, 
        protecting the interests of the Indian-American community, and educating 
        Members of Congress;
Whereas over the years, the Indian American Friendship Council has been the 
        Indian-American organization in the vanguard of representing the Indian-
        American community and fostering relationships between Members of 
        Congress and Indian-Americans nationwide;
Whereas, in particular, the Council has been instrumental in moving forward 
        efforts ranging from rebuilding Gujurat following the disastrous 
        earthquake, to supporting the fight against terrorism following the 
        September 11, 2001, attacks in the United States and the December 13, 
        2001, attack on the Indian Parliament;
Whereas as the Indian American Friendship Council continues to honor its mission 
        for years to come, it is only under the outstanding leadership of Dr. 
        Krishna Reddy, founder and president of the Indian American Friendship 
        Council, that the Council will continue to be as successful as it has 
        been since its creation; and
Whereas the Members of the Indian American Friendship Council and its friends 
        pay tribute to Dr. Reddy's dedicated service, expertise, and loyalty to 
        improving relations between the two largest democracies in the world, 
        the United States and India: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors the Indian 
American Friendship Council.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 345 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 345

 Condemning all acts of discrimination and violence and supporting the 
                      No Room for Racism campaign.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2002

Mr. Stark submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Condemning all acts of discrimination and violence and supporting the 
                      No Room for Racism campaign.

Whereas judging people by appearance, by color of skin and other physical 
        characteristics, and by religious beliefs is contrary to the most 
        fundamental principles of the United States;
Whereas racism undermines and destroys our unity as a people, and leads to 
        social unrest and alienation; and
Whereas there have been reports that Americans of middle eastern background have 
        been threatened and harassed: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives condemns all acts of 
discrimination and violence and supports the No Room for Racism 
campaign initiated by citizens of Hayward, California.
                                 <all>
```
Docket: HHS-OS-2010-0012 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Dependent Coverage of Children to 

Age 26, etc. 

Comment On: HHS-OS-2010-0012-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Dependent Coverage of Children to 

Age 26, etc. 

Document: HHS-OS-2010-0012-0002 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-11391 

Submitter Information 

Name: John Drake 

General Comment 

These regulations need to be extended to children covered by Medicaid and Medicare 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: August 12, 2010 

Received: May 19, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: June 09, 2010 

Tracking No. 80af0c67 

Comments Due: August 11, 2010

Submission Type: Unknown

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/ContentViewer?objectId=0900006480af0c... 8/12/2010
#### In the Matter of Percy W. Barton.

Order on motion to punish Mrs. Barton lor contempt \reversed, without costs.
#### Jacob Haag and another, Respondents, v. Charles Hillemeyer, Appellant.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event and order of reference vacated. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated:  November 6, 2009
    /s/ Eugene B. Shepherd, Jr.Eugene B. Shepherd, Jr.Executive Vice President and 
Chief Financial Officer
USARCENT Trains Deploying Soldiers in counter-UAS
 
  By Capt. Richard Moore
  **KUWAIT -** U.S. Army Central conducted the inaugural “Green Sands” training July 13 to 24 at Camp Buehring, Kuwait.
Green Sands” is designed to incorporate counter-unmanned aerial systems, or counter-UAS, into base defense operations. The training consists of both command post exercises in a Base Defense Operations Center, or BDOC, and a counter-UAS live fire.
“The purpose of the Base Defense Operations Center and Counter UAS training ultimately comes down to force protection,” said Col. Damon Sheffield, USARCENT’s Chief of Protection, G36. “Protection of our base, our camps, and our personnel. And it also establishes a baseline of training for our soldiers as they come into theater and integration of our counter UAS systems.”
The training incorporates the latest in ground-based counter-UAS capabilities including mission command systems and the mobile-low, slow, unmanned aircraft integrated defense system, or M-LIDS. The M-LIDS is a wheeled vehicle designed to destroy the types of threats the students may encounter.
“This morning, we trained with the M-LIDS which is a maneuverable capability,” said Capt. Basil Wang, an operator at the “Green Sands” training. “We also discussed the coyote missile system which is one of the primary systems to engage (UAS) across the theater.”
USARCENT plans to perpetually facilitate this training for units transitioning into the U.S. Central Command region. Sheffield said this training is designed to address an identified gap in counter-UAS training.
“The inspiration behind Green Sands is that CENTCOM Headquarters identified a gap,” said Sheffield. “Within that gap, we did not have a standardized baseline training course where we could integrate counter-UAS into a BDOC training platform.”
In recent years, the threat posed by UAS increased as malign regional actors continue to use and experiment with this relatively cheap weapons system. Due to its low cost to entry, it is becoming the weapon of choice for potential adversaries resulting in rapid technology proliferation and increased employment.
“The UAS threat is a shared security challenge for the U.S. and our regional partners,” said Lt. Gen. Patrick Frank, U.S. Army Central commanding general. “Green Sands provides dynamic training to Soldiers who are confronted with this threat. The multiple repetitions of demanding scenarios, to include a live fire exercise, are the foundation for force protection throughout the CENTCOM AOR.”
United States Army Central is the U.S. Army Service Component Command for United States Central Command and is responsible to the Secretary of the Army for the support and administration of more than 12,000 Soldiers, including those assigned to joint task forces and embassies, across the 21 countries in the CENTCOM Area of Responsibility.
§ 804.7 Procedures for public announcement of meetings. ( a ) For each meeting, the NTSB shall make public announcement, at least one week before the meeting, of the: ( 1 ) Time of the meeting;
( 2 ) Place of the meeting;
( 3 ) Subject matter of the meeting;
( 4 ) Whether the meeting is to be open or closed; and
( 5 ) The name and business telephone number of the official designated by the NTSB to respond to requests for information about the meeting.
( b ) The one week advance notice required by paragraph (a) of this section may be reduced only if: ( 1 ) A majority of all Members determines by recorded vote that NTSB business requires that such meeting be scheduled in less than seven days; and
( 2 ) The public announcement required by paragraph (a) of this section is made at the earliest practicable time.
( c ) Immediately following each public announcement required by this section, or by § 804.8, the NTSB shall submit a notice of public announcement for publication in the Federal Register.
[42 FR 13284, Mar. 10, 1977, as amended at 81 FR 75731, Nov. 1, 2016]
Sl()-l()()4()7-()2 3 

# 2 5 •iO M SOIfllfWESTER M ELECTRI C POWE R Southwester n Electri c Powe rCompan y P O Bo i 2110 0 Shrcvcpori , L A 71156000 1 oep.co m (Mont h date) , 201 0 The Honorabl e Raymon d H . LaHoo d Secretar y U.S . Department

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Docket DOT-OST-2010-«H k Dea r Mr . Secretary : Than k yo u fo r th e opportunit

y t o expres s (my/our) suppor t fo r th e applicatio n fo

r antitrus t immunit y an d propose d join t

busines s agreement

file d b y American Airline s an d Japa n Airlines . Th e propose d allianc e betwee n thes e tw o airline s i s vital fo r oneworl d t o compet e effectively wit

h th e Sta r an d SkyTea

malliance . Thi s increase d interallianc e competitio n wil l i n turn enhanc e th e benefit s o f th e Department' s Ope n Skie s polic y - firs t b y solidifyin g U.S.-Japan Open Skies , the n b y servin g a s afoundatio n fo r furthe r liberalizatio n acros s Asia . Afte r athoroug h review , (I/we ) encourag e th e Department o f Transportatio n t

o approv e thi s applicatio n a s i t

woul d enabl e thes e oneworl d allianc e airline s t o wor k closely together t o deliver highl y competitiv e air

transportatio n services . Approval fo r AA/JA L allianc e wil l hav e apositiv e impac t on air trave l b y offerin g customer s more service , schedulin g and pricin g option s an d wil l help to ensure tha t customer s continu e to benefit fro mhavin g thre e competitiv e ai r alliance s t o choos e from . I urg e you t o quickl y approv e thi s application . Sincerely , I T.Hubbar d ' SWEPC O 42 8 Travi s St . Shreveport , La . 7110 1 jthubbard@aep.co m
# Distribution of Humanitarian Relief in Rukban Successful

/ Published Nov. 8, 2018

November 8, 2018

CJTFOIR Release # 20181108-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**BAGHDAD –** Thousands of tons of United Nations humanitarian aid have been safely delivered to the Rukban internally displaced persons camp near At Tanf, Syria. The Maghaweir al-Thowra, a partner of Combined Joint Task Force - Operation Inherent Resolve, provided security to ensure the safe delivery of the UN convoy.

The security provided by the MaT allowed for UN and Red Crescent aid workers to safely administer life-saving medical and humanitarian relief prior to the winter season, when mortality rates would be expected to be highest without assistance. 

"The enduring defeat of ISIS will require more than a purely military solution,'' said Maj. Gen. (UK) Christopher Ghika, deputy commander for CJTF-OIR. “The toxic and evil impact ISIS has had in the region will ultimately be eradicated, but that will require international assistance to ensure that innocent people like those in Rukban are not forgotten.”

CJTF-OIR and its partners continue to stand ready to enable future delivery of UN humanitarian relief to the people of Rukban until they are able to return home as we pursue our mission of an enduring defeat of ISIS.

#DefeatISIS
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.45 What materials are used to send urine specimens to the laboratory? ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, you must use a shipping container that adequately protects the specimen bottles from shipment damage in the transport of specimens from the collection site to the laboratory.
( b ) You are not required to use a shipping container if a laboratory courier hand-delivers the specimens from the collection site to the laboratory.
[65 FR 79526, Dec. 19, 2000. Redesignated at 88 FR 27639, May 2, 2023]