58244 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2023 / Notices 

17For calculated (estimated) ad valorem 

importer-specific assessment rates used in 

determining whether the per-unit assessment rate is 

de minimis, see Memorandum, ‘‘Preliminary 

Results Margin Calculation for Shanghai Yueda 

Nails Co., Ltd.,’’ dated concurrently with this 

notice, and accompanying Margin Calculation 

Program Logs and Outputs. 

18See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

19See NME Practice for a full discussion. 

20 Id. 

1See Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube 

from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary 

Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2021–2022, 88 FR 27444 (May 2, 2023) 

(Preliminary Results). 

2See Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube 

from Mexico, the People’s Republic of China, and 

the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders; 

Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from the 

assessment rate is de minimis.17 We will 

instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries covered 

by this review when the importerspecific ad valorem assessment rate 

calculated in the final results of this 

review is not zero or de minimis. Where 

Shanghai Yueda’s ad valorem weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de 

minimis, or an importer-specific ad 

valorem assessment rate is zero or de 

minimis,18 we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

For the final results, if we continue to 

treat the two companies, identified 

above, as part of the China-wide entity, 

we will instruct CBP to apply an ad 

valorem assessment rate of 118.04 

percent to all entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR which was 

exported by those companies. 

For entries that were not reported in 

the U.S. sales data submitted by 

Shanghai Yueda, Commerce will 

instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at 

the rate for the China-wide entity.19

Additionally, if Commerce determines 

that an exporter under review had no 

shipments of the subject merchandise, 

any suspended entries that entered 

under that exporter’s case number (i.e., 

at that exporter’s cash deposit rate) will 

be liquidated at the rate for the Chinawide entity.20

In accordance with section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, the final results 

of this review shall be the basis for the 

assessment of antidumping duties on 

entries of merchandise covered by the 

final results of this review and for future 

deposits of estimated antidumping 

duties, as applicable. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for shipments of 

the subject merchandise from China 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for Shanghai 

Yueda, the cash deposit rate will be 

equal to the weighted-average dumping 

margin established in the final results of 

this review (except that if the ad 

valorem rate is de minimis, then the 

cash deposit rate will be zero); (2) for 

previously investigated or reviewed 

Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not 

listed above that have separate rates, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

existing exporter-specific cash deposit 

rate; (3) for all Chinese exporters of 

subject merchandise that have not been 

found to be entitled to a separate rate, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate for 

the China-wide entity; and (4) for all 

non-Chinese exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not received 

their own separate rate, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate applicable to the 

Chinese exporter that supplied that nonChinese exporter. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this POR. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This administrative review and notice 

are issued and published in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act, 19 CFR 351.213, and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: August 18, 2023. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

V. Discussion of the Methodology 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2023–18314 Filed 8–24–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–914] 

Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and 

Tube From the People’s Republic of 

China: Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2021–2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) continues to 

find that Hangzhou Ailong Metal 

Product Co., Ltd. (Ailong), the sole 

company subject to the administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on light-walled rectangular pipe and 

tube from the People’s Republic of 

China (China) covering the period of 

review (POR) August 1, 2021, through 

July 31, 2022, is not eligible for a 

separate rate and, thus, is part of the 

China-wide entity. 

DATES: Applicable August 25, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephen Bailey, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0193. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On May 2, 2023, Commerce published 

the preliminary results for this 

administrative review.1 We invited 

interested parties to comment on the 

Preliminary Results. No interested 

parties submitted comments. 

Accordingly, Commerce has made no 

changes to the Preliminary Results. 

Because Commerce received no 

comments on the Preliminary Results, 

we have not modified our analysis and 

no decision memorandum accompanies 

this Federal Register notice. We are 

adopting the Preliminary Results as the 

final results of this review. Commerce 

conducted this administrative review in 

accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 2

The merchandise subject to this Order 

is certain welded carbon quality lightVerDate Sep<11>2014 18:23 Aug 24, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM 25AUN1

ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2023 / Notices 58245 

Republic of Korea: Notice of Amended Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 73 

FR 45403 (August 5, 2008) (Order). 

3See Order, 73 FR 45403; see also 

Implementation of Determinations Under Section 

129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act: Certain 

New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires; Circular 

Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe; Laminated 

Woven Sacks; and Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe 

and Tube from the People’s Republic of China, 77 

FR 52683 (August 30, 2012). 

walled steel pipe and tube, of 

rectangular (including square) cross 

section, having a wall thickness of less 

than 4 mm. The term carbon-quality 

steel includes both carbon steel and 

alloy steel which contains only small 

amounts of alloying elements. 

Specifically, the term carbon-quality 

includes products in which none of the 

elements listed below exceeds the 

quantity by weight respectively 

indicated: 1.80 percent of manganese, or 

2.25 percent of silicon, or 1.00 percent 

of copper, or 0.50 percent of aluminum, 

or 1.25 percent of chromium, or 0.30 

percent of cobalt, or 0.40 percent of 

lead, or 1.25 percent of nickel, or 0.30 

percent of tungsten, or 0.10 percent of 

molybdenum, or 0.10 percent of 

niobium, or 0.15 percent vanadium, or 

0.15 percent of zirconium. The 

description of carbon-quality is 

intended to identify carbon-quality 

products within the scope. The welded 

carbon-quality rectangular pipe and 

tube subject to this Order is currently 

classified under the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

subheadings 7306.61.50.00 and 

7306.61.70.60. While HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and CBP’s customs 

purposes, our written description of the 

scope of the Order is dispositive. 

Final Results of Administrative Review 

As noted above, we received no 

comments on, and made no changes to, 

the Preliminary Results. We continue to 

find that the sole mandatory 

respondent, Ailong, is not eligible for a 

separate rate, and, thus, is part of the 

China-wide entity. In this 

administrative review, no party 

requested a review of the China-wide 

entity, and Commerce did not selfinitiate a review of the China-wide 

entity. Because no review of the Chinawide entity is being conducted, the 

China-wide entity rate is not subject to 

change as a result of this review. The 

rate previously established for the 

China-wide entity is 255.07 percent.3

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce 

has determined, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise in 

accordance with the final results of this 

review. We intend to instruct CBP to 

apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 

255.07 percent (i.e., the China-wide 

entity rate), to all entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR which 

were exported by Ailong. Commerce 

intends to issue assessment instructions 

to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the 

date of publication of these final results 

of this review in the Federal Register. 

If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of subject merchandise from 

China entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the publication date of the final results 

of this administrative review, as 

provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act: (1) for Ailong, that has not been 

found to be entitled to a separate rate, 

the cash deposit rate will be that for the 

China-wide entity; (2) for previously 

investigated or reviewed Chinese and 

non-Chinese exporters that received a 

separate rate in a prior segment of this 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the existing exporterspecific rate; (3) for all Chinese 

exporters of subject merchandise that 

have not been found eligible for a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be that for the China-wide entity; and 

(4) for all non-Chinese exporters of 

subject merchandise which have not 

received their own rate, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate applicable to the 

Chinese exporter that supplied that nonChinese exporter. These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification of Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during the POR. Failure 

to comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties, and/or an increase 

in the amount of antidumping duties by 

the amount of the countervailing duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely written notification of the return 

or destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

Commerce is issuing and publishing 

the final results of this review in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: August 21, 2023. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2023–18385 Filed 8–24–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–583–856] 

Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products 

From Taiwan: Notice of Third Amended 

Final Determination of Sales at Less 

Than Fair Value Pursuant to Court 

Decision and Partial Exclusion From 

Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On June 23, 2023, the U.S. 

Court of International Trade (CIT) 

sustained the U.S. Department of 

Commerce’s (Commerce) second 

remand redetermination concerning the 

antidumping duty investigation of 

certain corrosion-resistant steel 

products (CORE) from Taiwan, which: 

(1) reinstated the use of an adverse 

inference in the calculation of 

respondent Prosperity Tieh Enterprise 

Co., Ltd.’s (Prosperity) reporting of yield 

strength for CORE production, and (2) 

reversed Commerce’s determination 

from the investigation to collapse 

mandatory respondent Prosperity with 

the other mandatory respondent, the 

Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Yieh 

Phui) and Synn Industrial Co., Ltd. 

(Synn) single entity (collectively, Yieh 

Phui/Synn). Accordingly, Commerce is 

issuing a third amended final 

determination for the less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation of CORE 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1