alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN-SERVICE TRANSFORMER MODEL

Presented at

QUARTERLY REVIEW MEETING

DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMER

DETERMINATION STUDY

J U N E 13, 1994

STEVE CO H N

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Oak Ridge, TN 37830

EE-DET-97-550 COMMENT 0E
TRANSFORMER ENERGY LOSS MODEL

A) CALCULATION OF STOCK

ASSUME INITIAL STOCK IN MVA

DEVELOP RETIREMENT FUNCTION

ATTACH RETIREMENT FUNCTION TO EACH VINTAGE

RETIRE INITIAL STOCK ANNUALLY

B) CALCULATION OF ADDITIONS TO STOCK

DEVELOP STOCK OF TRANSFORMERS IN MVA

CALCULATE ANNUAL ADDITIONS BY SUBTRACTING

DECLINING INITIAL STOCK AND SUM OF DECAYED

ADDITIONS TO TIME T

C) CONVERT STOCK AND ADDITIONS FROM MVA TO

NUMBER OF TRANSFORMERS

D) APPLY ESTIMATED LOSSES TO TSFORMER

STOCK AND ADDITIONS

EE-DET-97-550 COMMENT 0E
DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMER DATA AVAILABLE

TRANSFORMER STOCK PROXY

INITIAL YEAR

SUMMARY OF FERC FORM 1 INFO (EIA)

PEAK LOAD (EEI) '52

RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS (EEI) '52

VALUATION OF DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMERS (FPC) '52

TRANSFORMER ANNUAL ADDITIONS TO STOCK

NEMA FORM 590-B '81

ELECTRICAL WORLD ANNUAL T&D SURVEY '65

FERC FORM 1 '79

INITIAL STOCK, ADDITIONS, RETIREMENTS, AND

FINAL STOCK

EE-DET-97-550 COMMENT 0E
DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMER STOCK BASED ON GROWTH OF

CUSTOMERS AND/OR PEAK LOAD

TOTAL % INCREASE

TIME PERIOD RES. & COMM.

CUSTOMERS

PEAK LOAD

1961 - 1970 20.7 94.8

1971 - 1980 24.7 46.2

1981 -1990 1 16.9 1 27.1

EE-DET-97-550 COMMENT 0E
Estimation of additions

2

Time

EE-DET-97-550 COMMENT 0E
Retirem ent function: Wei bu ll d istrib.

(Parameters: a=35, b=4)

20 30

Year

EE-DET-97-550 COMMENT 0E
U. D istri bution Transformer Stock

9

1600000

200000 1

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Year

EE-DET-97-550 COMMENT 0E
U . S. Additions (units)

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Year

EE-DET-97-550 COMMENT 0E
U .S. Transformer Inventory

' '

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Year

10

EE-DET-97-550 COMMENT 0E
Load and no-load losses

(25 kVA transformer)

350

250

200

CU

m

Losses uncertain

No-load losses

0

1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995

Year

EE-DET-97-550 COMMENT 0E
CALCULATIONS FOR U.S. DISTRIBUTION

TRANSFORMER LOSSES

TRANSFORMER STOCK AND ADDITIONS ENERGY

LOSSES UTILIZE NO-LOAD AND LOAD LOSSES

AND LOAD FACTOR

TRNS(Ti) * DR(T2) * (ENL(T) + ELD(T) * (LF(T))

EE-DET-97-550 COMMENT 0E
IN-SERVICE DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMER MODEL

STRENGTHS:

Capital stock approach allows accumulation of vintages

Energy losses associated with each vintage

Retirement function attempts to simulate fraction of

inventory remaining at year t

Calibrated model predicts current sales reasonability

Forecast results take into consideration current inventory

as well as new technologies

WEAKNESSES:

Transformer inventory based on peak load growth

Calculation of annual sales based on heavily on

retirement function

Heavy reliance placed on estimates of energy losses

for each vintage

Model utilizes a simplistic energy loss formulation

EE-DET-97-550 COMMENT 0E
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edward F. Clark, Appellant.

Judgment and conviction reversed and a new trial ordered, and for that purpose the proceedings are remitted to the Court of Sessions of Monroe county. Opinion by

Corlett, J.;

Barker, J., dissenting.
<PAGE>

                                                     EXHIBIT 23.1



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-3 (File Numbers 333-43662, 333-40388 and 333-94607) and on
Forms S-8 (File Numbers 333-78385 and 333-78387) of Fortel Inc. of our report
dated January 8, 2001, relating to the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California

January 10, 2001



                            Page 66
Acute COC: N ES Chronic COC: N ES

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) Acute Concentration of Concern ( p pb) Chronic *

SARs SAR Class TSCA New Chemcial Category

Ecotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: Fate assessor: Ecotox assessor: Health assessor:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2042
DAVID E. TAYLOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FRESH FIELDS MARKETS, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James H. Michael, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-94-55-C) Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 7, 1997 Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David E. Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Patrick Murphy, Michael Frank Marino, Eric Anthony Welter, REED, SMITH, SHAW & MCCLAY, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation and dismissing his employment discrimination action for failure to conduct discovery and failure to prosecute. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Taylor v. Fresh Fields Markets, Inc. , No. CA-94-55-C (W.D. Va. June 27, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Date: June 5, 2012

MEMORANDUM TO: Air and Radiation Docket EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 2011
- 0542 SUBJECT: Meeting between Wilmar, VanNess Feldman and U.S. EPA
On June 5, 2012, representatives of Wilmar Oleo North America LLC, Wilmar International Limited and VanNess Feldman met with representatives of U.S. EPA OTAQ TCD met at EPA Headquarters in Washington, DC. A complete list of attendees is below. The meeting centered on discussion of EPA’s recent NODA finding that biofuels from palm oil would not qualify as rene wable fuels under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS2) program. Wilmar/VanNess Feldman presented information about the emissions factor from drained peat soils and about land cover change in response to expansion of palm oil plantations. They also discusse d a possible “green palm” pathway that would allow biofuels from palm oil under the RFS2 program if they were produced with appropriate technology to reduce GHG emissions.
Attendees Wilmar Oleo North America LLC John K. Cummings Vice President Wilmar International Limited Jeremy Goon Group Head
– CSR VanNess Feldman Janet M. Anderson Senior Technology and Policy Advisor Ben L. McMakin Principal Managing Director, Governmental Issues Tom á s E. Carbonell U.S. EPA Office of Transportation and Air Q uality (OTAQ) Paul Argyropoulos Senior Policy Adviser Benjamin Hengst Associate Director, Transportation and Climate Division (TCD) Sharyn Lie Director, TCD, Climate Economics and Modeling Center Robert Larson (video conference from Ann Arbor) Vincent Camobreco Angela Dickens AAAS Science & Technology Policy Fellow
**Exhibit 24-10**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

**KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS** that I, **Thomas J. Ridge** do hereby appoint John W. Rowe and William A. Von Hoene, Jr.,or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2007 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities andExchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present. 

**Thomas J. Ridge**

**DATE: February 1, 2008**
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

### ★
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 09/26 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 Sep 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL
H. Res. 516

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 9, 2002.

Whereas the Valley Sports American Little League baseball

team from Louisville, Kentucky, is the first team from

the United States to win the Little League World Series

since 1998;

Whereas the Louisville team is the first team from Kentucky

to ever reach the title game of the Little League World

Series in the 56-year history of the Little League Junior

Division championship;

Whereas the Louisville team has attained a select position as

one of only 10 United States teams to win the Little

League World Series in the last 35 years;

Whereas the members of the Louisville team demonstrated

perseverance that rivals that of any adult, with a season

that started in June and required winning both State and

regional championships to reach the World Series;

Whereas throughout their season, the Louisville team scored

106 runs, while allowing their competition to score only

10 runs;

Whereas the Louisville team played expertly against a determined and talented Japanese team for the Little League

World Series title;
2

•HRES 516 EH

Whereas the Louisville team broke multiple Little League

World Series records through a single pitcher achieving

44 strikeouts and 21 scoreless innings;

Whereas the 12 players on the Louisville team are a model

to the Nation’s youth because of their dedication, determination, and sportsmanship;

Whereas in the legacy of world-renowned Louisville Slugger

bats and Hall-of-Fame members Jim Bunning, Happy

Chandler, Earl Combs, and Pee Wee Reese, the Louisville

team has continued a long tradition of Kentucky contributions to the game of baseball;

Whereas the Louisville team’s performance demonstrates to

parents and communities throughout the Nation how athletic participation builds character and leadership in children; and

Whereas the Louisville team’s spirit and camaraderie and the

support of the team’s family members are a testimony to

baseball’s ability to bring families together: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) congratulates the Valley Sports American Little

League baseball team from Louisville, Kentucky, for

their outstanding performance in winning the 2002 Little League World Series;

(2) recognizes Troy Osborne, the manager of the

Louisville team, assistant coaches Keith Elkins and Dan

Roach, and players Aaron Alvey, Justin Elkins, Ethan

Henry, Alex Hornback, Wesley Jenkins, Casey Jordan,

Shane Logsdon, Blaine Madden, Zachary Osborne,
3

•HRES 516 EH

Jacob Remines, Josh Robinson, and Wes Walden for

demonstrating excellence and character throughout a

summer of little league baseball; and

(3) commends Little League Baseball for its 63-

year tradition of encouraging the development of sportsmanship and confidence in youth through its sponsorship

of world-class baseball.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12905]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5166]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Land Release for Penn Yan Airport

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice, request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration is requesting public 
comment on the Penn Yan Airport (PEO), Penn Yan, New York, Notice of 
Proposed Release from Aeronautical Use of approximately 10.00 +/- acres 
of airport property, to allow for non-aeronautical development.
    The parcel is located on the northwest corner of the Penn Yan 
Airport. The tract currently consists of 10.00 +/- acres of land and it 
is currently vacant. The requested release is for the purpose of 
permitting the airport owner to sell and convey title of 10.00 +/- 
acres for construction of a boat storage and maintenance facility by 
Land and Sea Properties.
    Documents reflecting the Sponsor's request are available, by 
appointment only, for inspection at the Office of the Yates County 
Legislature and the FAA New York Airport District Office.

DATES: Comments must be received by April 2, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to 
the FAA at the following address: Otto N. Suriani, Acting Manager, FAA 
New York Airports District Office, 600 Old Country Road, Suite 446, 
Garden City, New York 11530. In addition, a copy of any comments 
submitted to the FAA must be mailed or delivered to Mr. H. Taylor 
Fitch, Chairman, Yates County Legislature, at the following address: 
417 Liberty Street Penn Yan, NY 14527.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Otto N. Suriani, Acting Manager, New 
York Airports District Office, 600 Old Country Road, Suite 446, Garden 
City, New York 11530; telephone (516) 227-3809; FAX (516) 227-3813; 
email Otto.Suriani@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 125 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation 
Investment and Reform Act for the 1st Century (AIR21) requires the FAA 
to provide an opportunity for public notice and comment before the 
Secretary may waive a Sponsor's Federal obligation to use certain 
airport land for aeronautical use.

    Issued in Garden City, New York, on January 13, 2012.
Otto N. Suriani,
Acting Manager, New York, Airports District Office, Eastern Region.
[FR Doc. 2012-5166 Filed 3-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
#### § 543.9 Duration of exemption.

Each exemption under this part continues in effect unless it is modified or terminated under § 543.10, or the manufacturer ceases production of the exempted line.

[81 FR 66841, Sept. 29, 2016]
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 191 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 30, 2001.
Whereas on October 7, 2000, Hezbollah forces illegally crossed the Israeli 
        border with Lebanon and kidnapped 3 Israli Defense Force soldiers, Adi 
        Avitan, Binyamin Avraham, and Omar Souad;
Whereas 9 months after the kidnapping, Hezbollah released no information as to 
        the whereabouts and conditions of these soldiers;
Whereas the events leading up to, surrounding, and immediately following the 
        kidnapping remain unknown;
Whereas after long denial the United Nations admitted to possession of a 
        videotape that contains images which could provide material evidence for 
        the investigation into the incident on October 7, 2000;
Whereas this videotape would help to assess the conditions of the soldiers and 
        assist in the investigation to determine the identities of the 
        kidnappers and their methods; and
Whereas to date the United Nations is reluctant to transfer an uncensored form 
        of the videotape to Israeli Government authorities investigating this 
        incident: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that the 
United Nations should immediately transfer an unedited and uncensored form of 
the videotape that contains images which could provide material evidence for the 
investigation into the incident on October 7, 2000, when Hezbollah forces 
abducted 3 Israeli Defense Force soldiers, Adi Avitan, Binyamin Avraham, and 
Omar Souad, as well as any other material evidence the United Nations may 
possess, to the Israeli Government to assist its investigation of this incident.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 23.2

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
CT Communications, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Registration Nos. 33-59641, 33-59643, 33-59645, 333-15537, 333-30125, 333-38895
and 333-77323) of CT Communications, Inc. of our report dated April 14, 2000,
relating to the audited consolidated balance sheets of Palmetto MobileNet,
L.P. as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the related consolidated statements of
income and  partners' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years ended
December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, which report is included in Exhibit 99.1 of
the December 31, 1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A No. 1 of CT Communications,
Inc.



                                      /s/  Bauknight Pietras & Stormer, P.A.
                                      --------------------------------------
                                        Bauknight Pietras & Stormer, P.A.

Columbia, South Carolina
June 27, 2000
<iframe width="240" height="420" src="//www.census.gov/quickfacts/widget_240x420.php/?qfembed=62jy0hkc1" frameBorder="0" allowtransparency="true"></iframe>
 
 Did You Know
 Select a state to begin Select a state to beginAlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming
----

(2004/C 84 E/0027)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2455/03

by Erik Meijer (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(23 July 2003)

Subject:   Eurostat: ‘cash flow audit’ and ‘value for money’ study by way of supplementary measures to clarify what happened and prevent any recurrence

Answer given by Mr Solbes Mira on behalf of the Commission

(30 September 2003)

Both Parliament's resolution on the fight against fraud and its Decision on the discharge for 2001 call for the Commission to carry out an audit report on Eurostat. On 11 June 2003 the Commission instructed the Internal Audit Service (IAS) to examine a sample of up to 400 contracts and grants selected by an agreed procedure. This examination in no way supplants the independent investigation currently being conducted by the Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF). As the Commission's decision states, the abovementioned examination is to focus on ascertaining whether or not contracts concluded between 1999 and 2002 were legal and complied with the rules. As such it does not seek to investigate possible fraud, which is the remit of OLAF. The two investigations are therefore complementary.

The Commission's decision to instruct IAS to examine a sample of contracts and grants rather than carry out a full audit of Eurostat's internal controls was dictated by constraints of time and resources. On enquiry from the IAS, Vice President Kinnock confirmed that examination of the execution of contracts or grants was not excluded. If the IAS preliminary analysis were to provide good reasons to examine the execution of contracts or grants, then the Internal Auditor should decide on that in consultation with the Secretary General of the Commission in his capacity as co-ordinator of Commission actions relating to the Eurostat examinations. Given the recognised resource constraints and the need to fulfil the IAS task inside the essential deadline, an examination of the execution of all sampled contracts/grants would not however be possible.

In actual fact, as the Conference of Presidents was told in July 2003, IAS's first internal audit report relates to both award procedures and contract execution.

A cash-flow audit is not part of the current IAS examination; a cash flow audit on the EC budget funding would not have discovered the off-budget accounts.

The Commission's objective has consistently been to ensure the audit material requested by Parliament is established and delivered on time.

Furthermore, on 8 July 2003 the Commission took steps to secure certain archives at Eurostat's premises as a precautionary measure.

The Honourable Member is also advised to refer to the answer given to Written Question E-2204/03 from Mrs Stauner (1).

----

(1)OJ C 33 E, 6.2.2004, p. 234.

----
#### Ellen Urquhart, Respondent, v. City of Ogdensburgh, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Bockes, J.,

and by Learned, P. J., dissenting.
# U.S. and French Navies Display Interoperability in Recent Training Evolution

/ Published Nov. 29, 2018
**MANAMA, Bahrain -- **
NANOMATERIAL STANDARD RE VIEW EXPOSURE REPORT Page 1 of 3

P-09-257 Date 5/14/09

Assessor: C. Cinalli

Production Volume:

USE:

OTHER USES:

Chemical Name:NANOMATERIAL STANDARD RE VIEW EXPOSURE REPORT Page 2 of 3

P-09-257 Date 5/14/09

Fate Assessment :

General Population and Environmental Exposure

A qualitative evaluation of the releases estimated by CEB indicates that there is some

Questions for landfill releases:NANOMATERIAL STANDARD RE VIEW EXPOSURE REPORT Page 3 of 3

P-09-257 Date 5/14/09

Environmental Releases from the Engineering Report
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 19
- 00395
- CV

D. L.
- B., Appellant

v. T. D. and J. D., Appellee s

FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY NO. 18
- A
- 471, THE HO NORABLE CHRIS SCHNEI DER, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PE R CURIAM Appellant D. L.

- B. filed her notice of appeal on June 10, 2019. The appellate record was complete on June 27, 2019, making appellant ’ s brief due on July 17, 2019. On July 17, 2019, counsel for appellant filed a motion for extension of time to fi l e appellant’s brief. The Court granted the mo tion and ordered appellan t ’ s counsel to file appellant ’ s brief no later than Augu st 7, 2019. On August 6, 2019, appellant ’ s counsel filed a second motion requesting additional time to file appellant ’ s brief b e cause the appellate record is sealed , and appellant ’ s counsel is physically handicapped , making it challenging for h im to travel to the Third Court of Appeals to view the record . A ccordingly, appellant ’ s counsel al s o requested that the Court make

an acco m modation f or hi m and provide a hard copy or a CD of the trial exhibits to him by certi fied mail.2 T he rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition of appeals from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin . 6 .2( a ) (providi ng 180 days for court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule constrains this Court’s leeway in granting extensions. However, under these particular circumstances , we will grant the motion

. The Court will provide a copy o f the sealed r e cord to ap pellant ’ s counsel , provided that co unsel sign s th e Cour t ’ s sea led

- document acknowledgement form

. We order counsel to keep the record confidential an d use it sol ely for the purpose of th is appe al

. We further order counsel to file appellant’s br i ef no l ater than August 27, 2019. If the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may be required to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court. It is ordered on Aug u s t 14, 2019

.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Tr iana and Sm ith
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
ALPHARMA INC. SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS PLAN
(Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2005)





The Alpharma Inc. Supplemental Savings Plan (the "Plan") is hereby amended effective as of March 31, 2006, as follows:



1. Section 8.1 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following to the end thereof:

"A Participant who becomes employed by an unrelated employer upon the sale of (i) all or substantially all the assets used by the Company in the employing trade or business, or (ii) the Company's interest in the employing subsidiary, shall be deemed to have separated from service on the date immediately preceding the date that such Participant becomes an employee of the purchaser, unless the purchaser agrees in connection with the sale to be substituted for the Company as the sponsor of Plan.  Such Participant shall be entitled to a distribution in accordance with the terms of Sections 8.1 through 8.4."



- END -