alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b)


UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C.
1350






| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (a) the Annual Report on Form 10-K/ A of the Company
    for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 filed on the
    date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
    Report) fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and
|
| | (b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
    all material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                       



|                        | 
|----------------------- | 
|/s/ Michael R. Coltrane | 
|                        | 
|Michael R. Coltrane     | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 
|April 29, 2005          | 
|                       
|/s/ James E. Hausman    | 
|                        | 
|James E. Hausman        | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 
|April 29, 2005          |
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.05 MB)
 
 ftx Counterterrorism United States egypt BS 17 Bright Star 2017 Egyptian Mohamed Naguib Military Base Command-post Field training Exercise Bright Star 17 U.S. Air Force U.S. Army USAF training Centcom U.S. Central Command partnership bilateral MILITARY
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
§ 570.6 Brake power unit. ( a ) Vacuum hoses shall not be collapsed, abraded, broken, improperly mounted, or audibly leaking. With residual vacuum exhausted and a constant 25 pound force on the brake pedal, the pedal shall fall slightly when the engine is started, demonstrating integrity of the power assist system. This test is not applicable to vehicles equipped with full power brake system as the service brake performance test shall be considered adequate test of system performance. ( 1 ) *Inspection procedure.* With engine running, examine hoses visually and aurally for conditions indicated. Stop engine and apply service brakes several times to destroy vacuum in system. Depress brake pedal with 25 pounds of force and while maintaining that force, start the engine. If brake pedal does not fall slightly under force when the engine starts, there is a malfunction in the power assist system.
#### § 92.45 Other debt collections.

Separate rules exist for general collection of debts owed the United States under [31 U.S.C. 3711](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/31/3711), [3716](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/31/3716)-18; [4 CFR Ch. II](/on/2024-09-24/title-4/chapter-II).

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC02FE91.213/EC02FE91.213_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC02FE91.213/EC02FE91.213_original_size.png)
prckin$
Office of ExemptiorDetermirations Zea clotims <ivevTM Fe june 2015
Employee Benefits Security Administration (ATTN: Conflict of Interest Rule)
US Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue, NW Room N-5655 -
Washington, DC 20210 ed

Dear Department of Labor:

1 AM AGAINST the “Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice.” Please
do not adopt it.

The proposal requirements will increase costs considerably for investment firms.
Some firms will close their doors and people will lose jobs. | work in this industry
and do: not want to lose my job. Some firms will be able to pass along the higher
costs to the consumer. Do you want the consumer to pay higher costs again due to
higher « and unneeded additional regulations? -

The proposal: adds unnecessary and. excessive burdens ¢ on: advisors, which Ido not
think wilthelp.investors, particularly smaller investors, whom the Department of Labor...
says they are specifically interested in helping.. Your additignal requirements will make
advisors not want to help smaller investors. ;

Smaller investors/retirees will have difficulty finding an investment advisor to help them
or may lose their advisor. Just like thousands of people lost their health insurance and
current doctors when the Affordable Care Act was passed.

Did you even know, ‘that the proposals make advisors and their firms warrant that they
are doing everything right? They have to.warrant that they_and their firm have, complied
with every federal and state investment law.or else they: are in violation with every client
contract. No other industry or profession or governmental body or politician that | am
aware of has to comply with such’ standards. This is excessive and not reasonable.

Sincerely, St

Cai cue e0pealb =

Dane Cheek del(ale phy h ous oR Eo:
281% County Club Rd NV
unnler Haven, FE 238%]
CC: Senator Marco Rubio, 284 Russell Senate Office Building, Wash., DC 20510;
Senatot Bill Nelson, US Senate, 716 Senate Hart Office Building, Wash., DC 20510;
President Obama,-The White House, 1600-Pennsylvania Ave NW, Wash, DC 20500,.
Cangeessman: Denret Weosev 7
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            6041
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            7742
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  1480
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      13521
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             128
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               129
<LOANS>                                         348621
<ALLOWANCE>                                       1725
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  388311
<DEPOSITS>                                      338174
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               4291
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       45846
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  388311
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  20120
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 1329
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 21449
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               11506
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               11506
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             9943
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      750
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (16)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   7641
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2643)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        1653
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1653
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.02
<LOANS-NON>                                       1500
<LOANS-PAST>                                      1300
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   918
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   5300
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  1000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       25
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 1725
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              1725
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

Received: October 25, 2017

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1k1-8zfc-onsd

Comments Due: December 11, 2017

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2015-0017

Claims Procedure for Plans Providing Disability Benefits; Extension of Applicability 

Date

Comment On: EBSA-2015-0017-0291

Claims Procedure: Plans Providing Disability Benefits

Document: EBSA-2015-0017-DRAFT-0392

Comment on FR Doc # 2017-22082

Submitter Information

Name: Daniel Feinberg

Address: 383 - 4th Street Suite 201

Oakland, CA, 94607

Email: dan@feinbergjackson.com

Phone: 5102697998

General Comment

It has come to my attention that there is discussion about delaying the effective date of 

the DOL's ERISA administrative claim regulation. As a lawyer working in the ERISA 

disability field, I am very much opposed to any action that would delay the January 1, 

2018 effective date.

It is my understanding that the DOL already assessed and took into consideration the 

potential increase in cost of the regulations - so I do not view this as a legitimate basis 

for any further delay. I have litigated over 100 ERISA disability cases over the past 15 

years, I can attest that the new regulation will reduce litigation and the cost of claims 

that do end up being litigated. This is because the regulations put in place commonsense rules that facilitate a productive, full, and fair "administrative" process during 

the claim review and appeal period. As it currently stands, many ERISA claims 

administrators shirk their fiduciary responsibilities (perhaps motivated by the financial 
conflict of interest all too common for claims administrators who are usually for-profit 

insurance companies obligated to make a profit for their shareholders).

Considering "ERISA imposes higher-than-marketplace quality standards" on claims 

administrators, the regulations set to go into effect January 1, 2018 simply bring more 

clarity to the standards that need to be met to fulfill an already existing responsibility. 

See Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Glenn, 554 U.S. 105, 115 (2008). If this leads to 

increased costs or litigation (which it should not), it is simply evidence that, prior to 

the new regulations, claims administrators were not abiding by the law already in 

place.
###### Editorial Note on Part 801

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 801 appear at 86 FR 54641, Oct. 4, 2021.

#### § 801.12 Protection of records.

No person may, without permission, remove from the place where it is made available any record made available for inspection or copying under § 801.10(c). Removing, concealing, altering, mutilating, obliterating, or destroying, in whole or in part, such a record is deemed a criminal offense pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 641, 2071(a).
EXHIBIT
23.01









CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (Registration No. 333-37025) of Colonial Commercial Corp. and subsidiaries
of our report dated March 31, 2008 on our audit of the consolidated balance
sheet of Colonial Commercial Corp. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash
flows for the year ended December 31, 2007, which appears in this Form
10-K.








/s/ Eisner
LLP New York,
New York


March 31,
2008
Exhibit 32

Written Statement of
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350

Solely for the purposes of complying
with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
WidePoint Corporation (the Company), respectively, hereby certify, based on
our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
June 30, 2009 ( the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

/s/ STEVE L. KOMAR  Steve L. KomarChief
Executive Officer

/s/ JAMES T. MCCUBBIN  James T.
McCubbinChief Financial Officer

Date: August 14, 2009
#### Warren Currier, Appellant, v. The New York, West Shore and Buffalo Railroad Company, Respondent.

Reargument ordered.

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 29 April 2004

in Case C-240/01: Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Excise duties on mineral oils - Directive 92/81/EEC - Mineral oils used as heating fuel)

(2004/C 118/19)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-240/01: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: E. Traversa and K. Gross), with an address for service in Luxembourg, v Federal Republic of Germany (Agents: W.-D. Plessing and M. Lumma) — application for a declaration that, by applying Paragraph 4(1)(2)(b) of the Mineralölsteuergesetz (Law on the taxation of mineral oils) of 21 December 1992 (BGBl. I, p. 2185, corrigendum in 1993 I, p. 169), the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2(2) of Council Directive 92/81/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on mineral oils (OJ 1992 L 316, p. 12), as amended by Council Directive 94/74/EC of 22 December 1994 (OJ 1994 L 365, p. 46), in so far as that Member State has not made all mineral oils intended for use as heating fuel subject to excise duties — the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of: V. Skouris (Rapporteur), acting as President of the Sixth Chamber, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, J.-P. Puissochet, R. Schintgen and F. Macken, Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 29 April 2004, in which it:

----

(1)  OJ C 245, 1.9.2001.

----
#### § 826.38 Board review.

Either the applicant or agency counsel may seek review of the initial decision on the fee application, or the Board may decide to review the decision on its own initiative, in accordance with subpart H of part 821 for FAA safety enforcement matters appealed under section 609 of the Federal Aviation Act. If neither the applicant nor agency counsel seeks review and the Board does not take review on its own initiative, the initial decision on the application shall become a final decision of the Board 30 days after it is issued. Whether to review a decision is a matter within the discretion of the Board. If review is taken, the Board will issue a final decision on the application or remand the application to the administrative law judge who issued the initial fee award determination for further proceedings.
§ 821.53 Appeal. ( a ) *Time within which to file appeal.* An appeal from an emergency or other immediately effective order of the Administrator must be filed within 10 days after the date on which the Administrator's order was served on the respondent. The respondent shall simultaneously serve a copy of the appeal on the Administrator.
( b ) *Form and content of appeal.* The appeal may be in letter form. It shall identify the certificate or certificates affected and indicate that an emergency or other immediately effective order of the Administrator is being appealed.
-----Original Message----- 

From: Cathy Cuthbert [mailto:ccuthbert2001@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 9:05 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 

To whom it may concern, 

I have a small business with a 401k plan, and we each have IRA 

accounts. We have been adding our hard earned money to these plans 

since 1981. I want to retain the ability to direct my retirement plans 

the way I see fit and want to tell you in no uncertain terms to keep 

your mitts off my retirement money. The admin that grabs the retirement 

accounts of Americans will be thrown out of office faster than they can 

say Communist paradise. 

One last word: f'getaboutit. 

Sincerely, 

Cathy Cuthbert
1210-AB32-2-1586.html[7/26/2015 8:33:34 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jxw-z063

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2083

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: dh wilson

General Comment

Too much regulation!! 

I ditto the sentiments of another gentleman, "This new level of regulatory confiscatory control is not meant to

 prevent individual financial malfeasance, it is meant to provide another opportunity to collect fees and tariffs

 that are to be "needed" to implement these new regulations and the staffing required for their enforcement."

Stay out of our savings accounts, 401Ks, and all personal financial accounts. We need our governing leaders to

 focus on protecting the lives of Americans and let Americans control their financial affairs.

Senators, Congress and Mr. President, please take note of the outcry from the people. Leave our 401ks alone!!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of2 

~ 

" 

LEGAL PRO . 

PUBLlCAnO~~~G DIVISION 

-. BRANcHOULA.TIONS 

As of: August 25, 2010 

Received: August 10, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 25, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2d lc2 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-001O 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-201O-0010-0366 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

--------------------------------------------------------------------.... 

Submitter Information 

Name: Richard M Bruns 

Address: 


371 Union Street 


Bangor, 


Government Agency Type: Federal 

Government Agency: HHS 

General Comment 

August 10, 2010 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 


Department of Health and Human Services 


Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 


Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 


Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to StaLlS 

as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-2010­

0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 

htlps:llfdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency1componentlsubmitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8125/2010 
Page 2 of2 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these 

regulations. 

Ric Bruns 

https:/ Ifdms.erulemaking.netifdms-web-agency IcomponentisubmitterinfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/25/2010
IV

House Calendar No. 59

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 209

[Report No. 107–163]

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 25, 2001

Ms. PRYCE, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported

from the Committee on Rules.

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of July 26, 2001, providing

6 for consideration or disposition of the bill (H.R. 2620)

7 making appropriations for the Departments of Veterans
2

HRES 209 RH

1 Affairs and Housing and Urban Development and for sun2 dry independent agencies, boards, commissions, corpora3 tions, and offices for the fiscal year ending September 30,

4 2002.

House Calendar No. 59

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 209

[Report No. 107–163]

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII

with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

JULY 25, 2001

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed