alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 670.11 General. ( a ) The Administrator may conduct investigations, inspections, audits and examinations, and test the equipment, facilities, rolling stock and operations of a recipient's public transportation system.
( b ) To the extent practicable, the Administrator will provide notice to a recipient prior to initiating any activities carried out under the authorities listed in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) The Administrator will conduct activities carried out under this section at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, as determined by the Administrator.
( d ) In carrying out this section, the Administrator may require the production of relevant documents and records, take evidence, issue subpoenas and depositions, and prescribe recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT


We hereby  consent to the use in Amendmnet No. 1 to Form 10-KSB Annual Report of
Affinity  Entertainment,  Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year ended September 30,
1996, our report dated January 7, 1997,  relating to the consolidated  financial
statements of Affinity Entertainment, Inc. and Subsidiaries which appear in such
Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-KSB.



                                          /s/  Weinberg, Pershes & Company, P.A.



                                          WEINBERG, PERSHES & COMPANY, P.A.
                                          Certified Public Accountants


Boca Raton, Florida
March 18, 1997
§ 701.8 Responses to requests. ( a ) *Granting of requests.* When an initial determination is made to grant a request in whole or in part, the requesting party shall be notified in writing and advised of any fees charged under § 701.11(e). The records shall be disclosed to the requesting party promptly upon payment of applicable fees. The requesting party has the right to seek assistance from Amtrak's FOIA Public Liaison.
( b ) *Adverse determination of requests* — ( 1 ) *Types of denials.* The requesting party shall be notified in writing of a determination to deny a request in any respect. Adverse determinations or denials of records consist of: ( i ) A determination to withhold any requested record in whole or in part;
( ii ) A determination that a requested record does not exist or cannot be located;
( iii ) A denial of a request for expedited treatment; and
( iv ) A determination on any disputed fee matter including a denial of a request for a fee waiver.
( 2 ) *Deletions.* Records disclosed in part shall be marked clearly to show both the amount of the information deleted and the exemption under which the deletion was made unless doing so would harm an interest protected by an applicable exemption. If technically feasible, the amount of the information deleted and the exemption under which the deletion is made shall be indicated at the place in the record where such deletion is made.
( 3 ) *Content of denial letter.* The denial letter shall be signed by the FOIA Officer or designee and shall include: ( i ) A brief statement of the reason(s) for the adverse determination including any FOIA exemptions applied in denying the request;
( ii ) An estimate of the volume of information withheld (number of pages or some other reasonable form of estimation). An estimate does not need to be provided if the volume is indicated through deletions on records disclosed in part, or if providing an estimate would harm an interest protected by an applicable exemption;
( iii ) A statement that an appeal may be filed under § 701.10 and a description of the requirements of that section and of the right of the requesting party to seek dispute resolution services from either Amtrak's FOIA Public Liaison or the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS); and
( iv ) The name and title or position of the person responsible for the denial.
#### § 586.3 Applicability.

This part applies to low-volume manufacturers that wish to register with NHTSA as a replica motor vehicle manufacturer, and to manufacturers registered as replica motor vehicle manufacturers.
H. Res. 462

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 27, 2002.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 5011) making appropriations for military construction, family housing, and base realignment and closure

for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2003, and for other purposes. The first reading

of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against

consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be

confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on Appropriations. After general

debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the

five-minute rule. Points of order against provisions of the bill

for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived.

During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in
2

•HRES 462 EH

recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an

amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of the

Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8

of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as

read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the

House with such amendments as may have been adopted. The

previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill

and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening

motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

SEC. 2. House Resolution 421 is laid on the table.

SEC. 3. That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill (S. 2578) to amend title 31 of the

United States Code to Increase the public debt limit. The bill

shall be considered as read for amendment. The previous

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final

passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of

debate on the bill equally divided and controlled by the chair-
3

•HRES 462 EH

man and ranking minority member of the Committee on

Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to commit.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 29.603 How are funds distributed when a Tribe fully or partially withdraws from a compact and funding agreement administered by a consortium serving more than one Tribe, and the withdrawing Tribe elects not to or is ineligible to enter into a compact and funding agreement?

Unless otherwise agreed to by the consortium and the withdrawing Tribe, the consortium must return to the Department all funds not obligated and expended by the consortium associated with the withdrawing Tribe when the withdrawing Tribe elects not to or is ineligible to enter into a compact and funding agreement.
From: Lister [mailto:agnname@aol.com] 

Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 7:29 PM

To: e-ORI@dol.gov.

Subject: RIN 1210-AB39

People who are hurt on the job should not have to use their own sick time for doctor appointments.

Mary Ellen Lister

agnname@aol.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated statement of operations and consolidated balance sheet and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000022301
<NAME> COMCAST CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         539,061
<SECURITIES>                                   370,982
<RECEIVABLES>                                  471,971
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (81,273)
<INVENTORY>                                    390,698
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,653,658
<PP&E>                                       2,575,633
<DEPRECIATION>                               (932,031)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,580,308
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,122,069
<BONDS>                                      6,943,766
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       239,338
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,066,989)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,580,308
<SALES>                                      3,362,946
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,362,946
<CGS>                                        (898,271)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              (3,033,155)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (86,618)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (524,727)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (45,410)<F1>
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (42,171)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (37,849)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (6,084)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (43,933)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.18)
<FN>
<F1>Loss before income taxes and other items excludes the effect of minority
interests, net of tax, of $49,732.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### James Duffy, Respondent, *v.*Otis Elevator Company, Appellant.

*Duffy*v. *Otis Elevator Company,*134 App. Div. 913, affirmed.

(Argued March 27, 1911;

decided April 25, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 25, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained *517by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant, his employer.

*Henry S. Curtis*and *Frederick B. Campbell*for appellant.

*John F. Brennan*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., G-ray, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Chase and Collin, JJ.
Order filed January 26, 2023 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-23-00039-CV

____________

IN RE RAMESH KAPUR, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2019-38863

ORDER

On January 20, 2023, relator Ramesh Kapur filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. 

P. 52. Relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Scott Dollinger to vacate his 

December 12, 2022 order vacating the summary judgment order and Hughyun 

International, LLC’s motion to vacate, modify, or correct the summary judgment 

and motion to extend postjudgment deadlines. 

Because Judge Dollinger ceased to hold the office of Judge of the 189th 

District Court, Harris County, Texas, we are required to abate this mandamus 

proceeding to permit the respondent’s successor, the Honorable Tamika Craft, to 

consider the decision regarding relator’s request for relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 

7.2(b); see also In re Baylor Med. Ctr. at Garland, 280 S.W.3d 227, 228 (Tex. 2008) 
(orig. proceeding) (“Mandamus will not issue against a new judge for what a former 

one did.”). 

Therefore, we abate this proceeding, treat it as a closed case, and remove it 

from the court’s active docket. This original proceeding is abated until February 

27, 2023, to permit Judge Craft to consider the order underlying relator’s request for 

relief. On or before that date, Judge Craft shall advise the court of the action taken 

on relator’s request by filing a signed order reflecting her ruling concerning relator’s 

request for relief with this court. The court will then consider a motion to reinstate 

or dismiss the original proceeding, as appropriate.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Poissant.
DoD supports Pakistan's anti-Taliban operations
 By Donna Miles , American Forces Press Service
  
 WASHINGTON (April 28, 2009) – Defense leaders are “clearly pleased” to see the Pakistani military take action against increasingly emboldened Taliban forces, and have offered additional support if Pakistan’s government will accept it to promote a sustained effort, Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell said Tuesday. Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen and others have expressed “a very real concern” about the eroding security situation in Pakistan in recent weeks, Morrell told reporters. “They and others in this building were clearly pleased to see the Pakistan military take the initiative over the past couple of days and push back against the militants who had been encroaching ever further toward Islamabad,” he said. Taliban forces have moved in recent weeks from the Swat Valley into the Buner and Dir districts. But in recent days, Pakistani ground troops and heavy artillery have moved into the region to assault guerilla hideouts, with Pakistani jets and helicopters attacking Taliban positions from overhead. “We think the military operations that are under way in Buner and Dir districts are exactly the appropriate response to the offensive operations by the Taliban and other militants over the past few weeks,” Morrell said. “And so we are hopeful and encouraging of the Pakistan military that they are able to sustain these operations against the militants and to stem this encroachment on the more populated areas of Pakistan.” The military operations followed a highly criticized peace deal between the Pakistani government and Taliban elements in Swat. “We have made no secret of the fact that we have never been a big fan of these agreements or deals that they have reached with militants” in parts of the Federally Administered Tribal Areas of Pakistan that border Afghanistan, Morrell said. The United States stands ready to provide more assistance to keep up the effort if the Pakistani government will accept it, he said. “We have made it clear for a long, long time that we are ready, willing and able to do more than we are doing,” he said. “The fundamental obstacle to this, historically, has been a comfort level on the part of the Pakistani government.” Recent activities by the Taliban could change that, he said. The Pakistani government “obviously, based on these military operations, recognizes the activities in Swat and Buner and Dir as a real threat to them,” he said. “So, as long as there is that recognition and appropriate action in response, we are pleased and ready to help in additional ways.” Morrell recognized sacrifices the Pakistani military has already made, with 3,000 of its troops killed or injured in operations along the country’s western border. “They have been involved in this fight,” he said. “But the key is to sustain these operations at this tempo and to keep the militants on their heels and ultimately defeat them.”
### Can rain cause volcanic eruptions?

By: Larry G. Mastin**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr93445

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
From: richard garcia [mailto:rogarcia@windstream.net] 

Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 3:35 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: 401K/IRA

Please refrain from getting involved in America’s retirement accounts and processes. You 

simply need to leave things alone instead of building an unmanageable and costly political 

process.
Saudi Arabia, U.S. Complete International Coalition Exercise
 
  By International Maritime Security Construct Public Affairs
  Maritime forces from Saudi Arabia and the United States participated in a monthly international coalition exercise in the Arabian Gulf, Sept. 20.
During a one-day training period organized by the International Maritime Security Construct (IMSC), Royal Saudi Navy ship HMS As-Siddiq (PGG 511) and U.S. Coast Guard fast response cutter USCGC Charles Moulthrope (WPC 1141) participated in latest iteration of exercise Sentinel Shield “This was a good training opportunity for our crew while working with our Saudi partners in the Arabian Gulf,” said Lt. Cmdr. Stephen Hills, commanding officer of Charles Moulthrope. “They were very professional and extremely easy to work with.” The ships conducted vessel defense and small boat training during the event, which is part of a monthly exercise series that enhances maritime communication and coordination among IMSC’s nine member-nations. IMSC was formed in July 2019 in response to increased threats to freedom of navigation for merchant mariners transiting international waters in the Middle East. Coalition Task Force Sentinel, the operational arm of IMSC, was established four months later to deter state-sponsored malign activity and reassure the merchant shipping industry in the Bab al-Mandeb and Strait of Hormuz. “Sentinel Shield exercises are indispensable for ensuring we are tactically and operationally proficient, which, in turn, provides reassurance to our merchant and industry partners,” said Royal Navy Commodore Ben Aldous, commander of IMSC and Coalition Task Force Sentinel.
The multinational coalition is headquartered in Bahrain with U.S. 5th Fleet and includes Albania, Bahrain, Estonia, Lithuania, Romania, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, and the United States.
§ 37.77 Purchase or lease of new non-rail vehicles by public entities operating a demand responsive system for the general public. ( a ) Except as provided in this section, a public entity operating a demand responsive system for the general public making a solicitation after August 25, 1990, to purchase or lease a new bus or other new vehicle for use on the system, shall ensure that the vehicle is readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities, including individuals who use wheelchairs.
( b ) If the system, when viewed in its entirety, provides a level of service to individuals with disabilities, including individuals who use wheelchairs, equivalent to the level of service it provides to individuals without disabilities, it may purchase new vehicles that are not readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities.
( c ) For purposes of this section, a demand responsive system, when viewed in its entirety, shall be deemed to provide equivalent service if the service available to individuals with disabilities, including individuals who use wheelchairs, is provided in the most integrated setting appropriate to the needs of the individual and is equivalent to the service provided other individuals with respect to the following service characteristics: ( 1 ) Response time;
( 2 ) Fares;
( 3 ) Geographic area of service;
( 4 ) Hours and days of service;
( 5 ) Restrictions or priorities based on trip purpose;
( 6 ) Availability of information and reservations capability; and
( 7 ) Any constraints on capacity or service availability.
( d ) A public entity receiving FTA funds under 49 U.S.C. 5311 or a public entity in a small urbanized area which receives FTA funds under 49 U.S.C. 5307 from a state administering agency rather than directly from FTA, which determines that its service to individuals with disabilities is equivalent to that provided other persons shall, before any procurement of an inaccessible vehicle, file with the appropriate state program office a certificate that it provides equivalent service meeting the standards of paragraph (c) of this section. Public entities operating demand responsive service receiving funds under any other section of the FT Act shall file the certificate with the appropriate FTA regional office. A public entity which does not receive FTA funds shall make such a certificate and retain it in its files, subject to inspection on request of FTA. All certificates under this paragraph may be made and filed in connection with a particular procurement or in advance of a procurement; however, no certificate shall be valid for more than one year. A copy of the required certificate is found in appendix C to this part.
( e ) The waiver mechanism set forth in § 37.71(b)-(g) (unavailability of lifts) of this subpart shall also be available to public entities operating a demand responsive system for the general public.
[56 FR 45621, Sept. 6, 1991, as amended at 79 FR 21406, Apr. 16, 2014]
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 347 0

_____________________________ A LLEN D WAYNE T OWNSEND , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Jan Shackelford , Judge

. July 17, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , O STERHAUS , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long , Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tall ahassee
, for Appellee.