alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.207 What is the effect of a cancelled drug test? ( a ) A cancelled drug test is neither positive nor negative. ( 1 ) As an employer, you must not attach to a cancelled test the consequences of a positive test or other violation of a DOT drug testing regulation (*e.g.,* removal from a safety-sensitive position).
( 2 ) As an employer, you must not use a cancelled test for the purposes of a negative test to authorize the employee to perform safety-sensitive functions (*i.e.,* in the case of a pre-employment, return-to-duty, or follow-up test).
( 3 ) However, as an employer, you must not direct a recollection for an employee because a test has been cancelled, except in the situations cited in paragraph (a)(2) of this section or other provisions of this part that require another test to be conducted (*e.g.,* §§ 40.159(a)(5) and 40.187(b)(2), (c)(1), and (e).
( b ) A cancelled test does not count toward compliance with DOT requirements (*e.g.,* being applied toward the number of tests needed to meet the employer's minimum random testing rate).
( c ) A cancelled DOT test does not provide a valid basis for an employer to conduct a non-DOT test (*i.e.,* a test under company authority).
( d ) If a test is cancelled for a correctible flaw (*e.g.,* § 40.203 or § 40.205), only the MRO who cancelled the test can reverse the cancellation and must do so within 60 days of the cancellation. After 60 days, the MRO who cancelled the test cannot reverse the cancellation without the permission of ODAPC. For example, if an MRO cancels a test because the MRO did not receive a copy of the CCF, but later receives a copy of the CCF, the MRO may reverse the decision to cancel the test within 60 days. After 60 days, the MRO must contact ODAPC for permission to reverse the cancellation. An MRO must not reverse the cancellation of a test that the laboratory has reported as rejected for testing, as described in § 40.83(g). A laboratory is not authorized to reverse a cancellation due to a fatal flaw, as described in § 40.199.
[65 FR 79526, Dec. 19, 2000, as amended at 73 FR 35975, June 25, 2008; 88 FR 27648, May 2, 2023; 89 FR 51983, June 21, 2024]
AMENDMENT

      The undersigned, as signatories to the August 22, 2003 Agreement governing
the duties and compensation of Vaquero Oil and Gas, Inc. do hereby agree that
only Section 4 (a) of such agreement is modified as follows:

Section 4. Advances to Develop Oil and Gas Prospects. (a) In order to enable VOG
to perform its obligations hereunder, VP shall deliver to VOG (i) $150,000 as a
one-time advance on prospect development fees (the "Prospect Development
Advance"), payable in accordance with subsection (b) below, (ii) 91,667 shares
Dune's common stock (having an agreed upon value of $.02 per share) and (iii)
commencing on the date that VOG leases its office pursuant to Section 5 below,
$25,000 on the first day of each of the first six (6) months during the Term of
this Agreement and $12,500 on the first day of each month thereafter for the
second six months of the Term, for prospect development fees. It is expressly
understood that neither VOG, its officers, directors, employees or agents shall
be entitled to any other remuneration other than as specifically set forth in
this Section 4.

By signatures affixed below, the parties reaffirm the entirety of this
Agreement, except Section 4(a) as noted above.

Accepted and Agreed to this seventeenth day of November, 2003 by:


/s/ Mark G. Harrington                               /s/ Rick Trapp
------------------------------                       ---------------------------
Dune Energy, Inc.                                    Vaquero Oil and Gas, Inc.
Mark G. Harrington, President                        Rick Trapp, President & CEO


                                                     /s/ Paul Williams
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Vaquero Oil and Gas, Inc.
                                                     Paul Williams, Chairman
#### Harriet Balou, Respondent, v. Theodore P. Balou and others, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Follett, J. ,
PUBLIC LAW 109–107—NOV. 22, 2005 119 STAT. 2289

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2490:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):

June 27, considered and passed House.

Nov. 8, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–107

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 442 West

Hamilton Street, Allentown, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Mayor Joseph S. Daddona

Memorial Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

442 West Hamilton Street, Allentown, Pennsylvania, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Mayor Joseph S. Daddona Memorial Post

Office’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Mayor

Joseph S. Daddona Memorial Post Office’’.

Approved November 22, 2005.

Nov. 22, 2005

[H.R. 2490]
#### § 92.29 Limitation on amount of deductions.

The size and frequency of installment deductions shall bear a reasonable relation to the size of the debt and the employee's ability to pay. However, the amount deducted for any period may not exceed 15 percent of the disposable pay from which the deduction is made, unless the employee has agreed in writing to the deduction of a greater amount.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 478 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 478

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to 
     implementing the Medicine Equity and Drug Safety Act of 2000.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 10, 2002

 Mr. Berry (for himself, Mrs. Emerson, Mr. Brown of Ohio, Mr. Pomeroy, 
 Mr. Boswell, and Mr. Allen) submitted the following resolution; which 
          was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to 
     implementing the Medicine Equity and Drug Safety Act of 2000.

Whereas Americans fill approximately 3.0 billion prescriptions each year at a 
        cost of almost $117 billion;
Whereas prescription drug spending is projected to continue to increase at a 
        rate of approximately 17 percent per year;
Whereas brand-name prescription drug prices have doubled since 1990;
Whereas average prescription drug prices continue to increase at a rate three 
        times as high as general inflation and twice as high as medical 
        inflation;
Whereas drug prices are two times to ten times more expensive in the United 
        States than they are in other countries;
Whereas the Medicine Equity and Drug Safety Act of 2000 (``MEDS Act'') was 
        enacted pursuant to section 745 of the Agriculture, Rural Development, 
        Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 
        2001 (enacted by reference by Public Law 106-387)(114 Stat. 1549A-35); 
        and
Whereas the MEDS Act would allow pharmacists and drug wholesalers to import less 
        costly prescription drugs into the United States from FDA-approved 
        manufacturing facilities in Canada and other countries: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives urges the Secretary of 
Health and Human Services, in consultation with the Commissioner of 
Food and Drugs, to implement the Medicine Equity and Drug Safety Act of 
2000 in order to provide less costly prescription drugs to American 
consumers.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 359 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         March 7, 2002.
    Resolved,

SECTION 1. FURTHER EXPENSES OF THE PERMANENT SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE.

    For further expenses of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, 
there shall be paid out of the applicable accounts of the House of 
Representatives not more than $1,600,000.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION.

    Amounts shall be available under this resolution for expenses incurred 
during the period beginning at noon on January 3, 2002, and ending immediately 
before noon on January 3, 2003.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized by the 
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, signed by the chairman of such 
committee, and approved in the manner directed by the Committee on House 
Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in accordance 
with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 5. ADJUSTMENT AUTHORITY.

    The Committee on House Administration shall have authority to make 
adjustments in amounts under section 1, if necessary to comply with an order of 
the President issued under section 254 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency 
Deficit Control Act of 1985 or to conform to any reduction in appropriations for 
the purposes of such section 1.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
**Exhibit 23** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the    Registration Statements on    Form S-8    (Nos.    33-5456,33-38590,33-39387,33-53763,33-53899,333-19735,333-50583,333-101767,333-116466,333-109359,    and    333-110726)    of CLARCOR Inc. of our report dated January 31, 2007    relating to the financial statements, the financial statement    schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of    internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness    of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in    this    Form 10-K.     /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP     Louisville, Kentucky    January 31, 2007
# Greek, U.S. Naval Forces Conduct Passing Exercise in Arabian Gulf

/ Published Feb. 26, 2021

ARABIAN GULF (Feb. 25, 2021) – The U.S. Coast Guard patrol boats USCGC Adak (WPB 1333) and USCGC Maui (WPB 1304) participated in a passing exercise (PASSEX) with the Greek guided-missile frigate HS Hydra (F452) in the Arabian Gulf, Feb. 25.

The exercise included advanced maneuvers and communication drills flexing the crews’ abilities to operate together in a dynamic environment, and test and refine combined command and control processes.

“The United States and Greece are committed to advancing maritime security in the Eastern Mediterranean and beyond,” said U.S. Ambassador to Greece Geoffrey R. Pyatt.  “Today’s bilateral exercise is another example of our countries’ deepening military-to-military collaboration, which is at an all-time high and growing stronger each day.  Together, we are furthering shared defense and security goals enshrined in our countries’ Strategic Dialogue and our updated Mutual Defense Cooperation Agreement.”

Greece is a vital NATO ally, showing a commitment to regional peace and stability. Greece, the host of U.S. Naval Support Activity Souda Bay, is an enabler for U.S., Allied, and partner nation forces to operate and transit in and across critical sea lanes.

“This exercise was a great opportunity to work alongside our Greek partners to increase tactical proficiency and capabilities,” said Lt. Ben Williams, commanding officer of Maui. “As a crew we are always confident in our operational capabilities and working with the crew of Hydra validated our combined readiness.”

Exercises like this serve as a demonstration of the U.S. Navy’s continued commitment to strengthening coalition partnerships in the region.

Adak and Maui are deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations (AOO) in support of naval operations to ensure maritime stability and security in the Central region, connecting the Mediterranean and the Pacific through the western Indian Ocean and three strategic choke points.

The HS Hydra recently represented Greece at NAVEX 21 held in Abu Dhabi, UAE.

The U.S. 5th Fleet AOO encompasses about 2.5 million square miles of water area and includes the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, Red Sea and parts of the Indian Ocean. The expanse is comprised of 20 countries and includes three critical choke points at the Strait of Hormuz, the Suez Canal and the Strait of Bab al Mandeb at the southern tip of Yemen.
### SCOTT EVELD 30-Hour OSHA Hazard Recognition Training for the Construction Industry Course on 7/9/2014 UCSD-7008389
1210-AB32-2-1374.html[7/26/2015 2:46:03 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jw0-eu9g

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1870

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I sir am perfectly capable of taking care of my own retirement with out any help from this Government . I have

 live for 61 years with out the government controlling any of my life and will continue to do so until I am dead .

 Why all of a sudden does this regime think that we are all stupid . This is why Americans no longer trust their

 Government and I believe that they just trying to get there hands on my retirement to piss it away just like every

 thing else they touch !
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> OPUR1
<CIK> 0000022099
<NAME> COLUMBIA ENERGY GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES
<SUBSIDIARY>
   <NUMBER> 1
   <NAME> CEG
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    4,441,800
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    704,000
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,393,200
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       198,800
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 358,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,095,900
<COMMON>                                           800
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                    1,611,600
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            586,900
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               2,064,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,639,700
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             125,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 340,500
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  311,300
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                      2,800
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               2,615,400
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                7,095,900
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    3,189,200
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           158,200
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,346,400
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   2,540,800
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        648,400
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              29,200
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 677,600
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       164,400
<NET-INCOME>                                   249,200
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  249,200
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        71,800
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      138,000
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         831,600
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.01


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32**


**Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**


**(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
      Code)**





Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of Xvariant, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"),
      does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the fiscal quarter ended December 31,
      2003
      (the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
      contained in the Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China Bionanometer Industries Corporation and will be retained by China
      Bionanometer Industries Corporation (formerly Xvariant, Inc.) and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Dated:
                      August 17, 2006/s/
                        Chen MinChen
                        MinPresident
                        and Chief
                        Executive Officer
 /s/
                                Xiang QinXiang
                                QinChief
                                Financial Officer
From: Robert Parker [mailto:docp388@gmail.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 4:40 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Retirements

Dear Sir: 

Surely the Feds are not going to start regulating 401 K's and etc. 

What about RIN1210-AB33. Has our Gov't gone completely crazy. 

R. Parker
#### § 89.39 Administrative charges.

In accordance with 4 CFR 102.13, all administrative charges incurred in connection with the referral of the debt to the IRS shall be added to the debt and thus increase the amount of the offset.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0698.html[7/21/2015 9:48:47 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-ob5w

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0698

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Scott Felsted

Address:

125 Cottage Circle

Fayetteville, GA, 30215

Email: sfelsted@ymail.com

Phone: 678-876-9070

General Comment

I have worked and saved long and hard to prepare for my retirement. My wife and I have done a great job

 managing and investing. Now I am in my late 50's and now the Federal government wants to regulate my

 savings??? What the hell is that? 

Please stay out of my retirement and leave it alone. If an every day guy like me can figure it out any one else can

 to. Government does not have to protect people from everything. 

I will control my own thank you. If you guys start regulating these we the people will find a way to move our

 retirements elsewhere.

Tired of Government Intervention,

Scott Felsted
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-29-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-29-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.0
<CASH>                                          30,324
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,493
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,106
<INVENTORY>                                     58,282
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               160,527
<PP&E>                                         180,619
<DEPRECIATION>                                  97,714
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 282,519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,237
<BONDS>                                         37,656
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,162
<OTHER-SE>                                     155,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   282,519
<SALES>                                        394,264
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               394,264
<CGS>                                          273,702
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  273,702
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   696
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,759
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 44,192
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,164
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,918
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,918
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.64
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Colonial Commercial
Corp. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Bernard Korn, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)       the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

  By: /S/ BERNARD KORN
  -----------------------
  Name:  BERNARD KORN
  Chief Executive Officer

  November 14, 2003








<PAGE>