alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# March 23 Red Sea Update

/ Published March 23, 2024

March 23, 2024Release Number 20240323 - 01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla. –** From 2:50 to 4:30 a.m. (Sanaa time) March 23, the Iranian-backed Houthis launched four anti-ship ballistic missiles (ASBM) into the Red Sea in the vicinity of M/V Huang Pu, a Panamanian-flagged, Chinese-owned, Chinese-operated oil tanker.

At 4:25 p.m. (Sanaa time), a fifth ballistic missile was detected as fired toward M/V Huang Pu. The ship issued a distress call but did not request assistance. M/V Huang Pu suffered minimal damage, and a fire on board was extinguished within 30 minutes. No casualties were reported, and the vessel resumed its course. The Houthis attacked the M/V Huang despite previously stating they would not attack Chinese vessels.

Between 6:50 and 9:50 a.m. (Sanaa time), U.S. forces, including USS Carney (DDG 64), engaged six Houthi unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) over the southern Red Sea. Five crashed into the Red Sea, and one flew inland into Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen.

It was determined these UAVs presented an imminent threat to U.S., coalition, and merchant vessels in the region. These actions are taken to protect freedom of navigation and make international waters safer and more secure for U.S, coalition, and merchant vessels.
Ss /2 za T0D

STPigh object The

Ek

wk Mon F< fo pd 3) ra “— doce: oe

TR eecasnte-
aon

Ere Kicke
Pp. °-By Ger
i fintin Océ VE

22472
Carter highlights momentum in ISIL fight
 
  By Lisa Ferdinando, DoD News
  **WASHINGTON (Feb. 29, 2016) —** Momentum is on the side of the coalition fighting the
Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, Defense Secretary Ash Carter said Monday,
noting significant gains in Iraq and Syria. The secretary spoke in a joint news
conference at the Pentagon with Marine Corps Gen. Joseph F. Dunford Jr., the
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Forces on the ground in Iraq have
retaken Ramadi and are making progress in Anbar, while the coalition is making
"operationally significant strides" in Syria, he said. "Because of our strategy and
our determination to accelerate our campaign, momentum is now on our side and
not on ISIL's," Carter said. Gains Include Reclaiming Shadadi The secretary highlighted how
coalition forces recently reclaimed Shadadi, a town in northeastern Syria, that
he described as a "critical node" for ISIL training, logistics and
its oil enterprise. "As our partners take control of Shadadi, I believe we
will learn a great deal more about ISIL's criminal networks, its criminal
enterprise and what it does to sustain them," Carter said. Shadadi is important in efforts to
sever the "last major artery" between the Syrian city of Raqqa --
ISIL’s putative headquarters -- and the Iraqi city of Mosul, an "operation
critical to dissecting ISIL's parent tumor into two parts," he said. Accelerated Efforts Include Cyber The campaign to defeat ISIL is being
accelerated across Syria and Iraq, the defense secretary said. Coalition members are bombing ISIL's
banks and oil wells, he said, and cyber tools are being used to disrupt ISIL's
ability to operate and communicate over the virtual battlefield. The cyber efforts are being used,
particularly in Syria, Carter said, to disrupt ISIL's command and control
operations, cause the terrorists to lose confidence in their networks and to
interrupt their ability to control the population and the economy. Cyber is an "important new
capability," he said. "This is something that's new in this war, not
something you would've seen back in the Gulf War. It is an important use of our
Cyber Command -- and the reason that Cyber Command was established in the first
place." ISIL is one of five challenges that
must be addressed as part of DoD's mission to defend the nation, Carter told
reporters. The other challenges are Russian aggression in
Europe, a rising China that is "behaving aggressively," and the
threats of North Korea and Iran in their respective regions, he said.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS D IVISION O NE

S TATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.

D ANIEL ADEM VAN DAALEN , Petitioner

. No. 1 CA- CR 21-0117 PRPC

P etition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CR 2002-019041 The Honorable Timothy J. Ryan , Judge
REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL Maricopa County Attorney ’ s Office , Phoenix By Daniel Strange Counsel for Respondent

D aniel Adem Van Daalen , Tucson Petitioner FILED 8-31-2021STATE v. VAN DAALEN Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Cynthia J. Bailey, Judge Jennifer M. Perkins and Judge Maria Elena Cruz delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Daniel Adem Van Daalen seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief

. This is petitioner’s fourth successive petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petit ioner has not established an abuse of discretion. ¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
----

Action brought on 12 March 2004 by Kingdom of Spain against Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-133/04)

(2004/C 106/66)

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 12 March 2004 by the Kingdom of Spain, represented by Enrique Braquehais Conesa, Abogado del Estado, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

----

(1)OJ L 344 of 31.12.2003, p. 1.

----
----

Action brought on 18 March 2004 by the Kingdom of Spain against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

(Case C-145/04)

(2004/C 106/74)

An action against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 18 March 2004 by the Kingdom of Spain, represented by N. Díaz Abad, acting as agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The legal grounds on which this application relies are the following:

----

(1)OJ L 278, 08.10.1976, p. 1.

----
<Page>


                                                               [LOGO]

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 16 to the
registration statement on Form N-4 (No. 033-71686) (the "Registration
Statement") of our report dated February 20, 2004, relating to the financial
statements of First Fortis Life Insurance Company, which appears in such
Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the
heading "Independent Accountants" in such Registration Statement.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
April 5, 2004
Editorial Note on Part 801
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 801 appear at 86 FR 54641, Oct. 4, 2021.

§ 801.55 Interagency and intra-agency exchanges. ( a ) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5), any record prepared by an NTSB employee for internal Government use is exempt from public disclosure to the extent that it contains— ( 1 ) Opinions made in the course of developing official action by the NTSB but not actually made a part of that official action, or
( 2 ) Information concerning any pending NTSB proceeding, or similar matter, including any claim or other dispute to be resolved before a court of law, administrative board, hearing officer, or contracting officer.
( b ) The purpose of this section is to protect the full and frank exchange of ideas, views, and opinions necessary for the effective functioning of the NTSB. These resources must be fully and readily available to those officials upon whom the responsibility rests to take official NTSB action. Its purpose is also to protect against the premature disclosure of material that is in the developmental stage, if premature disclosure would be detrimental to the authorized and appropriate purposes for which the material is being used, or if, because of its tentative nature, the material is likely to be revised or modified before it is officially presented to the public.
( c ) Examples of materials covered by this section include, but are not limited to, staff papers containing advice, opinions, or suggestions preliminary to a decision or action; preliminary notes; advance information on such things as proposed plans to procure, lease, or otherwise hire and dispose of materials, real estate, or facilities; documents exchanged in preparation for anticipated legal proceedings; material intended for public release at a specified future time, if premature disclosure would be detrimental to orderly processes of the NTSB; records of inspections, investigations, and surveys pertaining to internal management of the NTSB; and matters that would not be routinely disclosed in litigation but which are likely to be the subject of litigation.
( d ) The deliberative process privilege does not apply to records created 25 years or more before the date on which the records were requested.
Exhibit 32.1

CHIRON CORPORATION

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report ofCHIRON CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation(the "Company"), on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,HOWARD H. PIEN, Chief Executive
Officerof the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:



This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

|Date: April 30, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/HOWARD H. PIENHOWARD H. PIEN
President and Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 21


                 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COLUMBIA GAS SYSTEM, INC.
                            as of December 31, 1995



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          State of
             Segment / Subsidiary                                                     Incorporation   
---------------------------------------------------                               --------------------
<S>                                                                 <C>
Oil and Gas Operations
----------------------
   Columbia Gas Development Corporation                                      Delaware
   Columbia Natural Resources, Inc.                                          Texas

Transmission Operations
-----------------------
   Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation                                     Delaware
   Columbia Gulf Transmission Company                                        Delaware

Distribution Operations
-----------------------
   Columbia Gas of Kentucky, Inc.                                            Kentucky
   Columbia Gas of Maryland, Inc.                                            Delaware
   Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.                                                Ohio
   Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania, Inc.                                        Pennsylvania
   Commonwealth Gas Services, Inc.                                           Virginia

Other Energy Operations
-----------------------
   Columbia Atlantic Trading Corporation                                     Delaware
   Columbia Coal Gasification Corporation                                    Delaware
   Columbia Energy Services Corporation                                      Kentucky
   Columbia Gas System Service Corporation                                   Delaware
   Columbia LNG Corporation                                                  Delaware
   Columbia Propane Corporation                                              Delaware
   Commonwealth Propane, Inc.                                                Virginia
   TriStar Ventures Corporation                                              Delaware
   TriStar Capital Corporation                                               Delaware
</TABLE>
#### § 8.29 Access by historical researchers and former Presidential appointees.

Access to classified information may be granted to historical researchers and former Presidents and Vice-Presidents and their appointees as outlined in Executive Order 13526 or its successor order. The general guidelines for access to classified information are contained in Executive Order 12968.

[81 FR 45982, July 15, 2016]
EXHIBIT 31.2



Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Janet N. Gutkin, Chief Accounting Officer of Comarco, Inc., certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Comarco, Inc.;
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date: June 13, 2014 | /s/ Janet N. Gutkin          
|------------------- | -----------------------------
|                    | Janet N. Gutkin              
|                    | Chief Accounting Officer     
|                    | (Principal Financial Officer)
-------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of 1 

AUG 2 0 2QlO 

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 

PUBLICATION &. REGULATIONS 

BRANCH PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION 

As of: August 20, 2010 

Received: August 09, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 20, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2c628 

Comments Due: August 16,2010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathe"ed 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-201O-001O-0177 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: Catharine Boswell WHITE 

Address: 

5001 Golf Road 

Skokie, IL, 60077-1203 

Email: cwhite0714@dls.net 

Government Agency Type: Federal 

Government Agency: HHS 

General Comment 

See attached file(s) 

Attachments 

IRS-2010-0010-0177.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

https:/Ifdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agencyIcomponentlsubmitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/20/201 0 
5001 Golf Road 

Skokie, IL 60077-1203 

August 9. 2010 

Office ofConsumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rei:lting 

to Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable 

Care Act 

As a consumer , I wish to comment on the interim final rule regarding 

health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-201O-001O-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part ofthe new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these 

regulations. 

Catharine B. White
agrmtstlmtbe Ex 10-15






AGREEMENT IN SETTLEMENT OF CONSULTING SERVICES DEBT 




THIS AGREEMENT made as of the 6 th day of March 2004. 




BETWEEN:   Martin Barrs , of San Francisco, California            and

 



CALIFORNIA NEWS TECH , of 529 Buchanan St., San Francisco, California, 94102 




WHEREAS : 




A. California News Tech, (the "Company") failed to pay its full consulting services expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 to its officers. 




B. Martin Barrs ("Officer"), the Company's Chief Technology Officer and Director, has not been paid a total of $11,200 for services rendered to the Company during the year ended December 31, 2003. 




C. The parties desire to enter into an agreement whereby the Company will issue a promissory note to Officer in consideration for services rendered to the Company. 




NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES THAT in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants hereinafter set-forth, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows: 




1.    The Company hereby agrees to issue a promissory note to Officer in the amount of $11,200 with zero percent (0 %) interest per annum which shall become due and payable on March 6, 2006 in consideration for services rendered to the Company by Officer during the year ended December 31, 2003. 




2.   This Promissory Note is made in settlement of all professional consulting fees owed to Officer to December 31, 2003 . This note shall not be transferable, assignable, nor collateralized. 




3.   The Company has the right to repay the entire amount due before March 6, 2006 without penalty. Repayment of the note shall not be made with funds raised from the sale of stock in the initial public offering during the year 2004. 



 

4.  The parties agree to execute and deliver all such further documents, agreements and instruments and take such other and further action as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out the purposes and intent of this Agreement. 




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed on this 4 th day of April, 2004 




California News Tech                    







/s/ Marian Munz                                                                                                                                         /s/ Martin Barrs 

By: Marian Munz                        By: Martin Barrs 

Its: President

 

 


	 	1
----

----

|                                                 |                                                                                 |                                      |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                                                 | **SOUTH                JERSEY GAS COMPANY**                                          |
|                                            |                                                                            |                                 |
| Date: August                9, 2005   | By:                                                                        | /s/ David                A. Kindlick |
|                                                 | David A. Kindlick                                                                    |
|                                                 | Executive                Vice President & Chief Financial                Officer |
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, October 25, 1995 (134), Para 134.14 Submission of Conference Report--H.R. 2020]
[Page 1595]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.134.14  submission of conference report--h.r. 2020

  Mr. LIGHTFOOT submitted a conference report (Rept. No. 104-291) on the 
bill (H.R. 2020) making appropriations for the Treasury Department, the 
United States Postal Service, the Executive Office of the President, and 
certain Independent Agencies, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
1996, and for other purposes; together with a statement thereon, for 
printing in the Record under the rule.
```
Page 1 of 1

ROCESSING DIVISION VE HEY LAG AUG 2 3 ig
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS hil WG 3 cow
B

As of: August 20, 2010

PUBLIC Status: Posted

Posted: August 20, 2010

SUBMISSION Comments Oue: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathe-ed
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0295
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: joanne pinelli
Address:
16 west 40th st
bayonne, NJ, 07002

General Comment

See attached file(s)

Attachments

IRS-2010-0010-0295.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=..._ 8/20/2010


{August 9,2010]

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to
Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations,

Joanne Pinelli
15 West 40" Sat
Bayonne, NJ 07002