alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Docket: EBSA-2010-0007 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in 

Retirement Plans 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0007-0001 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options 

Document: EBSA-2010-0007-DRAFT-0026 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: L. Timothy Giles 

Address: 

351 Woodbrook Crest 

Canton, 30114 

Email: timg153@gmail.com 

Phone: 678-493-9116 

Organization: retired 

General Comment 

I'm a retired actuary, age 70, who has outlived his 401k account, I retired at age 58. 

Life annuities are too expensive for many retirees. We require a lower income after our active 

retirement: no traveling, no car, no carousing. 

A lifetime annuity with declining payments after a fixed age, say 85, or maybe one that declined x% 

each year. Maybe even a temporary annuity, like to age 80. 

This submission was motivated by Robert Powell's article in MarketWatch. 

Thanks, 

Tim Giles, FSA 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: March 01, 2010 

Received: February 11, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80a9130d 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=Print&PrintId=0900006480a913... 3/1/2010
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION II

No. 51620-9-II

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent,

v.

JONATHAN LEVI DUNN, UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Appellant.

WORSWICK, J. — Jonathan Dunn appeals the sentencing court’s imposition of a 

discretionary legal financial obligation (LFO). The State concedes error. We accept the State’s 

concession and remand to the sentencing court to strike the jury demand fee.

FACTS

In 2013, Dunn was convicted of two counts of possession of a controlled substance with 

intent to deliver with a firearm enhancement, two counts of possession of a controlled substance, 

one count of unlawful possession of marijuana, and one count of first degree unlawful possession 

of a firearm. We granted Dunn’s personal restraint petition in part in 2017 and remanded for 

resentencing. As part of Dunn’s sentence, the sentencing court imposed a jury demand fee, 

criminal filing fee, and DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) collection fee. The court entered an order 

of indigency for Dunn. Dunn appealed the imposition of the jury demand fee.

ANALYSIS

Dunn argues, and the State concedes, that the sentencing court erred by ordering Dunn, 

who is indigent, to pay the jury demand fee. We accept the State’s concession and remand to the 

sentencing court to strike the jury demand fee.

Filed

Washington State

Court of Appeals

Division Two

April 16, 2019
No. 51620-9-II

2

Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill (ESHB) 1783 modified Washington’s system of 

LFOs and amended RCW 10.01.160(3) to prohibit trial courts from imposing discretionary LFOs 

on indigent defendants. LAWS OF 2018, ch. 269, § 6. ESHB 1783 also amended RCW 10.46.190 

to prohibit trial courts from imposing the jury demand fee on indigent defendants. LAWS OF

2018, ch. 269, § 9; see RCW 10.46.190. The amendments to the LFO statutes apply

prospectively to cases on direct appeal. State v. Ramirez, 191 Wn.2d 732, 747, 426 P.3d 714 

(2018).

Here, the sentencing court entered an order of indigency for Dunn. Because the trial 

court is prohibited from imposing a jury demand fee on indigent defendants, the jury demand fee 

imposed on Dunn is no longer authorized. Thus, we remand to the sentencing court to strike the 

jury demand fee.1

A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the 

Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 

2.06.040, it is so ordered.

Worswick, J.

We concur:

Maxa, C.J.

Sutton, J.

 

1 The briefs in this case were filed before Ramirez, 191 Wn.2d at 732, was decided. In light of 

Ramirez, the sentencing court on remand should also determine whether it must strike the 

criminal filing fee and the DNA collection fee. Ramirez, 191 Wn.2d at 747, 748, 750.
§ 800.40 Hearings. ( a ) Sections 556 and 557 of title 5, United States Code, do not apply to hearings held under this part. Unless otherwise specified, hearings held under this part are informal, fact-finding proceedings, at which there are no formal pleadings or adverse parties. Any rule issued in a case in which an informal hearing is held is not necessarily based exclusively on the record of the hearing.
( b ) The NTSB designates a representative to conduct any hearing held under this part. The General Counsel or a designated member of his or her staff may serve as legal officer at the hearing.
# Ships Supporting Two Naval Partnerships Conduct Training in Gulf of Aden

/ Published April 12, 2023

**MANAMA, Bahrain –** Ships from the navies of Japan and Italy sailed together and conducted combined training in the Gulf of Aden, April 8, while operating under two multinational maritime partnerships, Combined Maritime Forces and European Union Naval Forces.

Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force destroyer JS Makinami (DD 112) and Italian Navy frigate ITS Carlo Bergamini (F 590) transferred personnel and conducted professional exchanges on topics related to vessel boardings and maritime security.

“The combined training instilled a firm belief that our ships performing maritime operations can work together anytime and anywhere,” said Capt. Kenichi Fujii, commander of Japan’s 7th Escort Division that is in charge of Makinami.

During the training, Makinami operated in support of Combined Task Force (CTF) 151, one of four operational task forces under Combined Maritime Forces, which includes 38 member-nations and partners. CTF 151 conducts counter-piracy missions led by Republic of Korea Navy Rear Adm. Ko Seung-bum.

“Training opportunities that enable multinational naval forces to work together more closely enhances maritime security and stability in the Middle East. That’s why we are here,” said Ko.

Bergamini participated while operating under Task Force (TF) 465, a multinational naval unit from European Union Naval Forces that also focuses on countering piracy in the Middle East. Task forces from Combined Maritime Forces and European Union Naval Forces regularly collaborate to enhance interoperability through combined patrols and joint training.

Established in 2009, CTF 151 conducts maritime security operations to deter, disrupt and suppress piracy and armed robbery at sea, outside the Horn of Africa. The task force is headquartered in Bahrain with U.S. Naval Forces Central Command, U.S. Fifth Fleet and Combined Maritime Forces.
#### § 661.19 Sanctions.

A willful refusal to comply with a certification by a successful bidder or offeror may lead to the initiation of debarment or suspension proceedings under part 29 of this title.

[71 FR 14118, Mar. 21, 2006]
~ L 

### U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Documentation of OMB Review Under Executive Order 12866

TItlO Of Actlon: Renewable Fuel Standard Program: Standards for 2014, 2015, and 2016 and Biomass-Based Diesel Volume for',

. ',2017 - Proposed rule

.

DOcket#: EPA HQ OAR 2015 0111 i FRL#: 9927 28 OAR ~ RIN; 2060 AS22 j
This action was submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, titled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Whenever EPA makes publicly available a regulatory action that was reviewed under E.O. 12866, section 6(a)(3)(E) of the E.O. directs the Agency to also: (1) Make available to the public a copy of the information that was provided to OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) for review under the E.O., i.e., the text of tYtie draft regulatory action and, if applicable, an assessment of the potential costs and benefits, as well as additional information for those actions that are determined to be economically significant under the E.O. (Information requirements are described in sections 6(a)(3)(B) and (C)). (2) Identify for the public any substantive changes between the draft submitted to OIRA and the action that was subsequently issued, using a method that is complete, clear, and simple. (3) Identify for the public those substantive changes made at the suggestion or recommendation of OIRA. 

### For this regulatory action, were substantive changes made to information reviewed under E.O. 12866? [Please check the appropriate answer.] El No. [In the docket, include the information identified in item (1) below.] El Yes. [In the docket, include the information identified in items (1) —(3) below.] 

### Accordingly, the Agency has inc[uded this form and the following information in the public docket for this regulatory action: [Please check the appropriate information.] 

### p(1) A copy of the information that was provided to OIRA for review under the E.O. p(2) Documentation of any substantive changes made to the draft regulatory text that was submitted to OIRA when compared with what was subsequently made publicly avai[able. The documentation is provided on the pages following this form. Changes made at the suggestion or recommendation of OIRA, if any, are c[early identified through attribution to OIRA. EPA has used one or more of the following methods to note changes: [select the appropriate option(s).]

### p(a) Redline-Strikeout - A copy of the draft regu[atory action submitted, using redlinestrikeout to show the substantive changes that were made. p(b) Hand Markup — A copy of the draft regulatory action submitted, using handwritten notes to show the substantive changes that were made. ®(c) Note to the file - A document that identifies the substantive changes that were made, with page and paragraph references to the draft regulatory action that was submitted. If you have any questions about this regu[atory action or this documentation, p[ease call the contact:

~ 

### Name: oavidKorotney i Email:'koromey.aavia@ePa.gov iPhone:',7s4-z14-4sm I
Revised 05/05/2010
# October 31: Military airstrikes continue against ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq 

/ Published Oct. 31, 2016

October 31, 2016Release # 20161031-01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**SOUTHWEST ASIA -** On Oct. 30, Coalition military forces conducted 16 strikes against ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq. In Syria, Coalition military forces conducted seven strikes using attack, fighter and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL targets. Additionally in Iraq, Coalition military forces conducted nine strikes coordinated with and in support of the Government of Iraq using attack, bomber, fighter and remotely piloted aircraft and rocket artillery against ISIL targets. 

The following is a summary of the strikes conducted against ISIL since the last press release: 

**Syria**

**Iraq**

Strike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely.

A strike, as defined in the CJTF releases, means one or more kinetic events that occur in roughly the same geographic location to produce a single, sometimes cumulative effect for that location. So having a single aircraft deliver a single weapon against a lone ISIL vehicle is one strike, but so is multiple aircraft delivering dozens of weapons against a group of buildings and vehicles and weapon systems in a compound, for example, having the cumulative effect of making that facility (or facilities) harder or impossible to use. Accordingly, CJTF-OIR does not report the number or type of aircraft employed in a strike, the number of munitions dropped in each strike, or the number of individual munition impact points against a target. The information used to compile the daily strike releases is based on 'Z' or Greenwich Mean Time. 

Ground-based artillery fired in counter-fire or in fire support to maneuver roles are not classified as a strike as defined by CJTF-OIR. 

The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria, and the wider international community. 

The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have conducted strikes in Iraq include Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Coalition nations which have conducted strikes in Syria include Australia, Bahrain, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, the Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
From: Wayne Hansen [mailto:whansen@ci3.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 3:30 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule

Mr. Fred J. Wong

Employee Benefits Security Administration

U.S. Department of Labor

Office of Regulations and Interpretations Room N‐5655

200 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20210

The proposal to change the rules which would cause appraisers to assume fiduciary

responsibilities would be devastating to the administrative costs of our ESOP, which has

approximately 50 employee owners.  In fact, this type of continued pressure on

administrative costs may cause our company to drop our ESOP program completely.  

Many of our employees have a substantial amount of retirement equity value now, that

they would not have had, if the company ESOP had not been formed.  Please take into

account the harm such a regulation would cause.

Thank you for your consideration,

Wayne Hansen, President

CI3 (Control Installations of Iowa, Inc)

6200 Thornton Ave. Suite 190

Des Moines, IA 50321

515‐558‐9300
```

[109th Congress Public Law 107]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ107.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 2289]]

Public Law 109-107
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
442 West Hamilton Street, Allentown, Pennsylvania, as the ``Mayor Joseph 
   S. Daddona Memorial Post Office''. <<NOTE: Nov. 22, 2005 -  [H.R. 
                                2490]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 442 West 
Hamilton Street, Allentown, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Mayor Joseph S. Daddona Memorial Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Mayor Joseph S. Daddona 
Memorial Post Office''.

    Approved November 22, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2490:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            June 27, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 8, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N WASHINGTON , D . C ,

Motio no f AMERICANEAGL E AIRLINES , INC . fo r confidentia l treatmen t unde r Rul e 1 2 (Form

41 , Schedul e B-43 ) DOT-OST-1995-56 9

MOTIO NO F AMERICA NEAGL E AIRLINES , INC . FO RCONFIDENTIA L TREATMEN T UNDE RRUL E 1 2 Communication s wit hrespec t t o thi s documen t shoul d b e sen t to ; PETE RM . BOWLE R Presiden t America nEagl e Airlines , Inc . P.O . Bo x619616 , M D 549 4 DF WAirport , Texa s 7526 1 KATHLEE NSOLE D Vic e Presiden t & Genera l Counse l 7\merican Eagl e Airlines , Inc . P.O . Bo x619616 , M D 549 4 DF WAirport , Texa s 7526 1 (817 ) 967-157 4 kate.soled@aa.co m CAR L B . NELSON , JR . Associat e Genera l Counse l America nAirlines , Inc . 110 1 17t hStreet , N.W . Suit e 60 0 Washington , D.C . 2003 6 (202 ) 496-564 7 carl.nelson@aa.co m

Marc h30 , 201 0BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N WASHINGTON , D . C .

Motio no f AMERICANEAGL E AIRLINES , INC . fo r confidentia l treatmen t unde r Rul e 1 2 (Form41 , Schedul e B-43 ) DOT-OST-1995-56 9

MOTIO NO F AMERICA NEAGL E AIRLINES , INC . FO RCONFIDENTIA L TREATMEN T UNDE RRUL E 1 2 America nEagl e Airlines , Inc. , unde r 1 4 CF R302.12 , herebymove s tha t th e enclose d For m4 1 Schedul e B-4 3 fo r YE0 9 b e accorde d confidentia l treatmen t an d b e withhel d fro mpubli c disclosure . Th e informatio nfo r whic hconfidentia l treatmen t i s requeste d pertain s t o 7\mericanEagle' s airframe s an d air

craf t engin e acquisition s an d retirements . A s provide d i nRul e 12 , thi s informatio ni s i na seale d envelop e marke d "Confi

dentia l Treatmen t Requeste d Unde r Rul e 12. "2 -

O nJun e 5 , 1995 , bylette r o f Jame s W . Mitchell , Director , Offic e o f Airlin e Statistics , th e Departmen t grante d confidentia l treatmen t fo r a 10-yea r perio d t o simila r dat a file d byAmerica nAirlines , Inc . Fo r th e reason s state d i nMr , Mitchell' s letter , th e Departmen t shoul d als o gran t confiden

tia l treatmen t fo r 1 0 year s t o 7\mericanEagle' s data .

WHEREFORE , America nEagl e move s tha t th e schedule s submitte d unde r sea l wit hthi s motio nb e withhel d fro mpubli c disclosur e unde r Rul e 1 2 fo r a perio d o f 1 0 years . Respectfull ysubmitted .

CAR L B . NELSON , JR . Associat e Genera l Counse l America nAirlines , Inc . O nbehal f o f America nEagl e Airlines , Inc . Marc h30 , 201 0
From: Luke Seed [mailto:lseed@exp-eng.com] 

Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 2:49 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

I'm completely opposed to any government takeover or management of retirement accounts

like 401(k)s.

The government has shown itself wholly incapable of managing its own finances. Any

government interference with 401(k)s would just be yet another way to steal the hard‐earned

money of responsible Americans, so that politicians could spend it it on pork and welfare. That

would be morally grotesque ‐‐ and grind the economy to a halt.

Respect property rights: hands off our retirement savings!

Luke Seed

Mechanical Engineer | Expertise Engineering

www.exp-eng.com

4186-J Sorrento Valley Blvd

San Diego, CA 92121

858.642.7639
Editorial Note on Part 325
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 325 appear at 66 FR 49869, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 325.91 Exhaust systems. A motor vehicle does not conform to the visual exhaust system inspection requirements, 40 CFR 202.22, of the Interstate Motor Carrier Noise Emission Standards, if inspection of the exhaust system of the motor vehicle discloses that the system— ( a ) Has a defect which adversely affects sound reduction, such as exhaust gas leaks or alteration or deterioration of muffler elements, (small traces of soot on flexible exhaust pipe sections shall not constitute a violation of this subpart);
( b ) Is not equipped with either a muffler or other noise dissipative device; or
( c ) Is equipped with a cut-out, by-pass, or similar device, unless such device is designed as an exhaust gas driven cargo unloading system.
[40 FR 42437, Sept. 12, 1975, as amended at 75 FR 57193, Sept. 20, 2010]
1210-AB32-2-1483.html[7/26/2015 5:58:21 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwh-7fc8

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1979

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Jon Sumpter

General Comment

Please keep Government out of my retirement. We are not rich by any means,but we have managed to enjoy our

 retirement..
No. 07-17-00416-CR

Shaquille Cofer

 Appellant

v.

The State of Texas

 Appellee 

§

§

§

§

From the 364th District Court 

 of Lubbock County

December 6, 2017

Opinion Per Curiam

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated December 6, 2017, it is ordered, 

adjudged and decreed that this appeal be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that 

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 23, 2009

d0316 

# Order

March 23, 2009

136775(66)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 136775 COA: 275019 Livingston CC: 06-015781-FH MARK ROBERT PETRI, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s December 30, 2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does notappear that the order was entered erroneously.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 25, 2015 

# Order

August 25 , 2015

151294 & (109)

CITIMORTGAGE, INC.,

Plaintiff

- Appellee/Cross

- Appellant,

v

FMM BUSHNELL GREAT LAKES, L.L.C.,

successor in interest to FMM BUSHNELL, L.L.C.,

Defendant

- Appellant/Cross

- Appellee,

and

DR. RAMOTSUMI M. MAKHENE and

VELYNDA R. MAKHENE,

Defendants. SC: 151294

COA: 317422

Genesee CC: 12

- 098516

- CH

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the stipulation to dismiss both the application for

leave to appeal and the cross

- application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The

dismissal is with prejudice and without costs to any party.
§ 821.30 Initiation of proceeding. ( a ) *Appeal.* Where the Administrator has issued an order amending, modifying, suspending or revoking a certificate, the affected certificate holder (respondent) may file with the Board an appeal from the Administrator's order. The respondent shall simultaneously serve a copy of the appeal on the Administrator. The appeal must be filed with the Board within 20 days after the date on which the Administrator's order was served on the respondent, except as provided with respect to emergency and other immediately effective orders under § 821.53(a).
( b ) *Form and content of appeal.* The appeal may be in letter form. It shall identify the certificate or certificates affected and the Administrator's action from which the appeal is sought.
( c ) *Effect of filing timely appeal with the Board.* Timely filing with the Board of an appeal from an order of the Administrator shall postpone the effective date of the order until final disposition of the appeal by the law judge or the Board, except where the order appealed from is an emergency or other immediately effective order, in which case the effectiveness of the order will not be so stayed during the pendency of the appeal.