alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 271.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The purpose of this part is to improve railroad safety through structured, proactive processes and procedures developed and implemented by railroads. Each railroad subject to this part must establish a Risk Reduction Program (RRP) that systematically evaluates railroad safety hazards on its system and manages the risks associated with those hazards to reduce the number and rates of railroad accidents/incidents, injuries, and fatalities.
( b ) This part prescribes minimum Federal safety standards for the preparation, adoption, and implementation of RRPs. This part does not restrict railroads from adopting and enforcing additional or more stringent requirements not inconsistent with this part.
( c ) This part prescribes the protection of information a railroad compiles or collects solely for the purpose of planning, implementing, or evaluating an RRP under this part.
( d ) This part does not require an RRP to address hazards completely unrelated to railroad safety and that fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of another Federal agency. Additionally, an RRP required by this part is not intended to address and should not address the safety of employees while performing inspections, tests, and maintenance, except where FRA has already addressed workplace safety issues, such as blue signal protection in part 218 of this chapter. FRA does not intend to approve any specific portion of an RRP plan that relates exclusively to employee working conditions.
TUE FALL RIVER GROUP, INC

670 S. Main St. PO. Box 38 Fall River, WI 53932 (920) 484-2230 Fax (920) 484-2233

August 13, 2010

The Honorable Phyllis Borzi, Assistant Secretary
Employee Benefits Security Administration

U.S. Department of Labor

Washington, D.C. 20210

Attn: RIN 1210-AB42

The Honorable Jay Angoff, Director

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Washington, D.C. 20201

File Code: OCIIO-9991-IFC

Re: Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status as a
Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Position: Modifications to a Plan’s Provider Network or Self-funded Status Should Not
Affect Grandfather Status

Dear Ms. Borzi and Mr. Angoff,

On behalf of The Fall River Group, Inc., | am writing to ask you to give employers and
health plans the flexibility necessary to focus on delivering high-value health care
through their provider networks and urge you not to subject plans to increased
regulations if they opt to self-fund their health benefits.

We have been self funding our benefit plan for 10 years and believe it is critical in
providing quality, safe health care for our employees, while giving us some power to
negotiate reasonable charges based on performance. Without the unencumbered ability
to remove a provider from the network because of low performance or higher than
average costs we are not able to do our part in achieving a high value health system.

We provide health benefits to our employees because we care about their wellbeing and
the wellbeing of their families. That and the fact that self funded employers have a
significant financial stake in the health of their employees, are the reasons you have
seen a strong commitment to quality, safety and wellness initiatives from self-funded
employers.

The best way to ensure these efforts continue is to ensure that there is a return on these
investments — both for us as the plan sponsor and for our enrollees. By subjecting self-
funded plans to additional regulations you will discourage employers from self funding,
which is likely to negate any employer investment gained over the past several years.


A number of provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act appear to
support the twin goals of value based purchasing and consumer engagement. Self-
funding and enabling changes to provider networks to promote high value, safe care are
complementary strategies. | urge you not to tie grandfathered status to their adoption.

Thank you for your consideration of these comments.

Sincerely,

Kevin Lamp
Chief Financial Officer
The Fall River Group, Inc.
United States Department of the Interiorly El

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY ,„. ,f -5

Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance

Post Office Box 649

Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103 '<'. ' ~ • :' •"'

 l<

IN REPLY REFER TO: ' •••;.' . -..'» ••-

August 11, 1999

Ruby Williams

Remedial Project Manager (6SF-AP)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6

1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200

Dallas, Texas 75202-2733

Dear Ms. Williams:

The U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) has received information provided by the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on the Many Diversified Interests, Inc., Site,

Houston, Harris County, Texas. Our review of that information indicates that either:

1) natural resources under our trusteeship are not present on or in the vicinity of the Site; or 2)

natural resources under our trusteeship may be present but no known pathways exist for

migration of contaminants in amounts that would lead to exposure and subsequent injury of

those resources. Therefore, further DOI participation in the Superfund planning process

appears to be unnecessary at this time considering the nature of the contamination and the

actions EPA is taking to remediate the Site.

However, if during the Superfund planning process, new information is developed that results

in a determination that ecological risks are greater than we have previously concluded, DOI

should be notified immediately and, in this regard, we reserve the right to reevaluate our

position in this matter. Thank you for the opportunity to participate in planning at the Many

Diversified Interests, Inc., Site. Please feel free to contact us at (505) 766-3565 should you

require anything further regarding this matter.

Sincerely,

Glenn B. Sekavec

Regional Environmental Officer

cc: Chief, AR/OK/TX Branch (6SF-A),

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Dallas, Texas

193697

014707
# Aug. 23: Military airstrikes continue against ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published Aug. 23, 2015

August 23, 2015Release # 20150823FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**SOUTHWEST ASIA -** On Aug. 22, coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq. In Syria, coalition military forces conducted nine airstrikes using attack bomber, fighter and remotely piloted aircraft. Separately in Iraq, coalition military forces conducted 17 airstrikes coordinated with the government of Iraq using attack, bomber, fighter, fighter-attack and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL targets.The following is a summary of the strikes conducted against ISIL since the last press release:**Syria*** Near Al Hasakah, four airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed three ISIL structures, an ISIL armored truck and an ISIL bunker.* Near Al Hawl, one airstrike destroyed an ISIL excavator* Near Ar Raqqah, two airstrikes destroyed two ISIL excavators.* Near Ayn Isa, one airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed three ISIL bunkers and an ISIL supply truck.* Near Washiyah, one airstrike had inconclusive results.**Iraq*** Near Al Baghdadi, one airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed two ISIL buildings, an ISIL bunker, an ISIL excavator and an ISIL heavy machine gun.* Near Ar Rutbah, one airstrike destroyed two ISIL front end loaders.* Near Bayji, two airstrikes struck one large and one small ISIL tactical units and destroyed five ISIL buildings, two ISIL heavy machine guns, an ISIL IED and an ISIL recoilless rifle.* Near Mosul, two airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and an ISIL mortar firing position and destroyed an ISIL fighting position.* Near Ramadi, two airstrikes struck an ISIL vehicle and destroyed two ISIL buildings.* Near Sinjar, four airstrikes struck two ISIL tactical units and an ISIL staging area and destroyed six ISIL fighting positions, four ISIL light machine guns and an ISIL building.* Near Tuz, five airstrikes destroyed 27 ISIL fighting positions, two ISIL vehicles, an ISIL bunker, an ISIL rocket rail and an ISIL weapons cache.Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely.The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria and the wider international community.The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Iraq include Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Syria include Bahrain, Canada, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and the U.S.
Exhibit 10.12
 EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT  FOR  SAMUEL M. INMAN, III
 Agreement Effective Date Executive Company Party Parties.
 RECITALS
     Definitions
 Change of Control




---



##### 



Affiliate
 Board
 Confidential Information
 Good Cause
 Material Change




---



##### 



Severance Benefit Term
 Severance Equity Incentive
 Severance Cash Payment
 Severance Pay COBRA
 Termination Date




---



##### 



Term
 Employment
 Position and Duties
 Representations by Executive
  Salary and Bonus




---



##### 



Benefit Plans
 Paid Vacation
 Withholdings
 Car Allowance
 Code Section 409A Code
 Reasonable Business Expenses




---



##### 



Proprietary Information
 Confidential Information
 Non-Disclosure and Invention Agreement
 Unfair Competition
 Solicitation
 Injunctive Relief




---



##### 



Survivorship
 Notification to Subsequent Employer
 Termination by Company
 Companys Termination Right
 Termination by Company Without Good Cause
 Termination by Company With Good Cause




---



##### 



Disability Disability
 Death
 Termination by Executive
 Executives Termination Right
 Termination by Executive for Good Reason Good Cause Good Reason Termination
 Notice of Material Change




---



##### 



Change of Control
 Change of Control in Which Company Survives Options
 Change of Control in Which Company Disappears Replacement Options




---



##### 



Termination Following Change of Control
 Termination of Employment Followed by Rehiring
 Provisions Applicable to All Terminations
 Resignation from Positions
 Unpaid Cash Compensation; Accrued Vacation; Company Property
 Payment Upon Termination




---



##### 



Excise Tax Accountant
 Notices
 Arbitration
 Waiver
 Commencement
 Arbitrator
 Counsel




---



##### 



Authority
 Cost
 Decision
 Provisional Remedies
 Violation
 Stock Option Agreements Stock Option Agreements
 Miscellaneous
 Assignment
 Severability




---



##### 



Amendment
 Waiver
 Interpretation of Agreement
 Entire Agreement
 Governing Law
  /s/ Samuel M. InmanSamuel M. Inman COMARCO, INC., a California corporationBy:
    /s/ Robert J. MajtelesRobert J. MajtelesChairman of the Board




---



##### 



SCHEDULE 1.6
 ACCELERATED OF VESTING OF STOCK OPTIONS
 Schedule Agreement Executive Company
 July 17 Option
Agreement First Option
 November 12 Option
Agreement Second Option
  Date on Which the Options Shall Vest




---



##### 



Vesting Date
 Shares Subject to Accelerated Vesting Average Closing Price
 shares vesting
    
    =
    
    P  1.09
    
    x   140,0005.00  1.09
   Effect of the Issuance of Replacement Options
 Expiration of Options




---



##### 



No Effect on Previously Vested Option Rights
#### § 236.4 Interference with normal functioning of device.

The normal functioning of any device shall not be interfered with in testing or otherwise without first taking measures to provide for safety of train operation which depends on normal functioning of such device.

[49 FR 3382, Jan. 26, 1984]
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Brigham Exploration Company (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ben
      M.
      Brigham, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








Dated:
                May 8, 2006
            /s/
                BEN M. BRIGHAMBen
                M. Brigham
              Chief
                Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the
                Board








This
      certification shall not be deemed to be "filed" for the purpose of Section
      18 of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated
      by
      reference into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act of
      1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated
      therein by reference.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Brigham Exploration Company and will be
      retained by Brigham Exploration Company and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1210-AB32-2-1402.html[7/26/2015 4:28:10 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jw3-vfx3

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1898

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Craig Dawson

General Comment

My wife and I have saved our entire life's for our retirement. We have worked and forced ourselves to

 systematically add to our nest egg and will conservatively withdraw our assets as is required by our standards.

 Any regulations that would change or force me to something different than what we wish to do with our money

 is truly government over reach.
# Afghan court tries, convicts three men

/ Published Aug. 3, 2010

PARWAN PROVINCE, Afghanistan (Aug. 3, 2010) – Three Afghan men who are currently detained at the Detention Facility in Parwan were sentenced to serve time in an Afghan prison after an Afghan court found them guilty of crimes under Afghan law during trials held Aug. 1 at the Justice Center in Parwan.

The defendants were convicted of violating Laws on Crimes Against Internal and External Security Article 9, Organizational Activities Against Internal and External Security, Article 5, Subversive Activities, kidnapping and possessing illegal weapons and explosive materials.

In the first trial, two defendants were accused of being members of an illegal terrorist group and subversion.  According to court records, the men were detained in 2008 during a raid targeting suspected insurgents where they were found with improvised explosive device components and explosives, among other materials.  Insurgent propaganda materials were also recovered from the capture site.  One defendant tested positive for explosive residue after chemical testing.

Both defendants testified and attempted to blame each other for the IED materials and explosives recovered at the site, according to court records.

During the trial defense attorneys raised objections to the capture and detention of the men based on constitutional arguments suggesting that the Coalition capture and detention of Afghan citizens is illegal. 

The second trial had one defendant.  According to court records, the man was found in a compound where Coalition forces had received small-arms fire.  The defendant was found near a small prison on the compound where 15 Afghans were being held hostage.  Thirteen of the Afghans identified the defendant as a member of the Taliban and as the man who guarded the prison.  A weapons cache, including rockets, was also found at the site.

During the trial the defendant rejected the assistance of defense counsel despite the head judge’s repeated recommendations.  The defendant denied the charges against him and claimed that he used the rockets found with him for farming.   After examining the evidence the three-judge panel found the defendant guilty of kidnapping, weapons-related charges and being a member of an illegal terrorist group.

Under Afghan law, defendants have 20 days to make an appeal.

While detainees are currently held at the Detention Facility in Parwan under the Law of Armed Conflict, the government of Afghanistan investigates and prosecutes criminal cases at the JCIP and considers criminal charges under the Afghan Penal Code.

The cases were presented by Afghan prosecutors and the accused were all given the opportunity to be represented by Afghan defense attorneys.  A panel of three Afghan judges presided over the cases.

These trials, the second and third to be held at the JCIP, are indicative of significant steps that are being made toward transitioning detention operations and associated judicial processes from the United States to the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0809.html[7/21/2015 2:45:00 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-een5

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0809

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Edin Bosnyak

General Comment

Comment:

I am smart enough to plan for my own retirement and do not need the government involved at all. This is

 ridiculous. Stay out of my money, my planning and my retirement.
#### Johnson v. Greenleaf, *Appellant.*

Practice. Judgment affirmed, because, 1st, It does not appear by the record that the motion in arrest was filed in proper time; 2nd,. The bill of exceptions was filed after the term, without any record consent; 3rd, The instructions not being preserved, this court cannot discover on what theory the cause was tried.

*Appeal from. Franklin Circuit Court.*— Hon. A. J. Seay, Judge.

Affirmed.

*672
      *Crews ‡ Booth*for appellant.

*Hitchcock, Lubke*$• *Player*for respondent.

Sherwood, O. J.

Suit to foreclose a mortgage. It is impossible that we examine into the merits of this cause, for these reasons : Plaintiff' had judgment at the November term, 1875, when defendants filed their motion for a new trial, which was denied at the May term, 1876. Defendants, during that term, but when does not appear, filed their motion in arrest, which was then also denied. At the November term, 1877, defendants, without any record consent, filed their bill of exceptions. Even had the bill been filed in time, as the instructions have not been preserved, we could not discover on what theory the cause was tried. No error is discovered in the record proper. Therefore, judgment affirmed.

All concur; except Norton, J., absent.
<PAGE> 1


                              Accountants' Consent
                              --------------------


The Board of Directors
Colonial Commercial Corp.
   and Subsidiaries:



We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
2-62100) on Form S-8 of Colonial Commercial Corp. of our report dated March 26,
1996, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Colonial Commercial Corp.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1995, which report is
incorporated by reference in the December 31, 1995 annual report on Form 10-KSB
of Colonial Commercial Corp.




                                          /S/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


Jericho, New York
March 27, 1996
From: Diane Ducote [mailto:honeyducote@gmail.com] 

Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 12:19 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: US Labor Department seeks public comments on lifetime income options for retirement 

plans

Yet another horror story to be added to the list of horror stories the American people are 

mentally and literally compiling to teach future generations of the abuses of power 

generated by the Obama administration. This is one of the dumbest. 

Oh, I hope I'm not being too much of a big fat meany mean head, I know what sissies you 

are.
PHOTOS: Rehearsal of Concept Drill in Afghanistan
 By None  , U.S. Embassy - Kabul, Afghanistan
  KABUL, AFghanistan (April 11, 2010) — The U.S. Embassy in Kabul, U.S. Forces-Afghanistan, U.S. Central Command, and the Office of the Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan are co-hosting an intense interagency review of  U.S.civilian and military (civ-mil) efforts in Afghanistan for the coming year.  Dubbed a "Rehearsal of Concept (ROC) Drill," this two-day session brings together senior U.S. officials from Washington, Tampa and Kabul with their partners in Afghanistan, including senior Afghan officials and representatives of key allied nations, to discuss shared challenges and opportunities ahead.The U.S. Embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan, has released a Flickr  photostream of coalition leaders, including Gen. David Petraeus,  commander of U.S. Central Command and Afghan President Hamid Karzai,  taking part in a Rehearsal of Concept drill April 11. CLICK HERE TO SEE PHOTOS.