alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 821.55 Complaint, answer to complaint, motions and discovery. ( a ) *Complaint.* In proceedings governed by this subpart, the Administrator's complaint shall be filed and simultaneously served on the respondent within 3 days after the date on which the Administrator received the respondent's appeal, or within 3 days after the date of service of an order disposing of a petition for review of an emergency determination, whichever is later.
( b ) *Answer to complaint.* The respondent shall file with the Board an answer to the complaint within 5 days after the date on which the complaint was served by the Administrator, and shall simultaneously serve a copy of the answer on the Administrator. Failure by the respondent to deny the truth of any allegation or allegations in the complaint may be deemed an admission of the truth of the allegation or allegations not answered. The answer shall also identify any affirmative defenses that the respondent intends to raise at the hearing.
( c ) *Motion to dismiss and motion for more definite statement.* In proceedings governed by this subpart, no motion to dismiss the complaint or for a more definite statement of the complaint's allegations shall be made, but the substance thereof may be stated in the respondent's answer. The law judge may permit or require a more definite statement or other amendment to any pleading at the hearing, upon good cause shown and upon just and reasonable terms.
( d ) *Discovery.* Discovery is authorized in proceedings governed by this subpart. Given the short time available for discovery, the parties shall cooperate to ensure timely completion of the discovery process prior to the hearing. Discovery requests shall be served by the parties as soon as possible. A motion to compel discovery should be expeditiously filed where any dispute arises, and the law judge shall promptly rule on such a motion. Time limits for compliance with discovery requests shall be set by the parties so as to accommodate, and not conflict with, the accelerated adjudication schedule set forth in this subpart. The provisions of § 821.19 shall apply, modified as necessary to meet the exigencies of this subpart's accelerated timeframes.
[68 FR 22625, Apr. 29, 2003, as amended at 77 FR 63253, Oct. 16, 2012]
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10180.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10180.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
#### Miles Perry, *Respondent, v.*Cornelius B. Tompkins, *Appellant.*

— Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
§ 7.2 Definitions. Unless the context requires otherwise, the following definitions apply in this part: *Act* and *FOIA* mean the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, as amended.
*Administrator* means the head of each Operating Administration.
*Components* —see the definition of Department in this section.
*Concurrence* means that the approval of the individual being consulted is required in order for the subject action to be taken.
*Confidential commercial information* means trade secrets and confidential, privileged, and/or proprietary business or financial information submitted to DOT by any person.
*Consultation* has its ordinary meaning; the approval of the individual being consulted is not required in order for the subject action to be taken.
Department or DOT means the Department of Transportation, including the Office of the Secretary, the Office of Inspector General, and all DOT Operating Administrations, any of which may be referred to as a DOT component.
*First-party request* means a request by an individual for records pertaining to that individual.
*Hourly rate* means the actual hourly base pay for a civilian employee.
*Operating Administration* means one of the following components of the Department: ( 1 ) Federal Aviation Administration;
( 2 ) Federal Highway Administration;
( 3 ) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration;
( 4 ) Federal Railroad Administration;
( 5 ) Federal Transit Administration;
( 6 ) Maritime Administration;
( 7 ) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration;
( 8 ) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration; and
( 9 ) Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation.
*Reading room records* are those records required to be made available to the public without a specific request under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2), as described in § 7.12.
*Record* includes any writing, drawing, map, recording, diskette, DVD, CD-ROM, tape, film, photograph, or other documentary material, regardless of medium, by which information is preserved. The term also includes any such documentary material stored electronically by computer.
*Redact* means delete or mark over.
*Representative of the news media* means any person or entity that gathers information of potential interest to a segment of the public, uses its editorial skills to turn the raw materials into a distinct work, and distributes that work to an audience. “News” means information that is about current events or that would be of current interest to the public.
*Responsible DOT official* means the head of the DOT Operating Administration concerned, or the General Counsel or the Inspector General, as the case may be, or the designee of any of them authorized to take an action under this Part.
*Secretary* means the Secretary of Transportation or any individual to whom the Secretary has delegated authority in the matter concerned.
*Toll* means temporarily stop the running of a time limit.
[79 FR 16209, Mar. 25, 2014, as amended at 82 FR 21139, May 5, 2017]
# Defenders protect ASAB from drones

/ Published Dec. 27, 2021
ALI AL SALEM AIR BASE, Kuwait, 
The threat of unmanned aerial system attacks against U.S. forces in the Middle East has given the U.S. Central Command reason to increase training and preparedness of bases in the theater of operations.Airmen at Ali Al Salem Air Base, Kuwait, have continued this ongoing effort to protect and defend the installation from UAS threats."We take care of the airspace for our area,” said Staff Sgt. Daniel Butts, 386th Expeditionary Security Forces Squadron noncommissioned officer in charge of counter-small unmanned aerial systems. “So we're here to detect, track, identify and then, if need be, defeat.”U.S. Air Force and U.S. Army assets have been bolstering their c-SUAS efforts, which has helped develop seminars to provide leadership with guidance on how the 386th ESFS is countering drone threats.“The seminars are a one-on-one opportunity for general leadership to understand what our capabilities are,” Butts explained. “These systems provide real time video or a picture and now leadership has a better understanding of what others could use it for.”U.S. Marine Corps Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr., U.S. Central Command commander, told the Senate House Committee earlier this year that UAS is "the most concerning tactical development in the CENTCOM area of operations since the rise of the Improvised Explosive Device."Attacks occurring this year against coalition forces in Iraq and Syria have prompted others in the AOR to ramp up their c-SUAS and c-UAS programs.This unconventional base defense has drove the mindset for Defenders that are protecting against UAS attacks.“We call it the ‘kill chain’....detect, track, identify and defeat,” explained Butts. “The main thing is detecting so we're able to see it and track it. Once we're able to track it, we're going to identify it, which is key to helping us understand if it's hostile or not and to what extent.“Then we can defeat it.”
Exhibit 32.12



          Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
            pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Spectrum Organic
Products, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Neil G. Blomquist, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2)   the information contained in the Report presents fairly, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                              /s/ Neil G. Blomquist
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Neil G. Blomquist
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              May 6, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Rockingham,

June, 1894.

#### Corson *v.*Boston & Maine Railroad.

Case, for negligence. The defendants excepted to the denial of their motion for a nonsuit.

*William F. Nason*and *Edwin G.*Eastman, for the plaintiff.

*Worcester, Gaffney Snow,*for the defendants.

Carpenter, J.

No attempt has been made to sustain the exception. The evidence was sufficient to warrant a verdict for the plaintiff.

*Exception overruled.*

Blodgett, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED
October 6, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________
No. 03-10239 Summary Calendar

_______________________

LEROY LEE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DONNA TANOUE, Chairman Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Defendant-Appellee.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

Fort Worth Division Civil Docket 4:01-CV-835-BE

_________________________________________________________________

Before JONES, BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

LeRoy Lee appeals the denial of his post-judgment motion

for new trial. Because Lee filed his motion more than ten days

after the district court entered final judgment, the motion is

properly characterized as a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. Harcon2

Barge Co., Inc. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc. , 784 F.2d 665, 667 (5th

Cir. 1986). Lee’s notice of appeal, which specifically designates

the post- judgment motion as the order being appealed, is timely

only as to the denial of that motion. Thus, this Court reviews the

district court’s denial of the motion for an abuse of discretion.

See Halicki v. Louisiana Casino Cruises, Inc. , 151 F.3d 465, 470

(5th Cir. 1998).

The district court granted the FDIC’s motion for summary
judgment, concluding that Lee failed to commence his civil action

within the applicable 90-day window and also failed to exhaust his

disability discrimination claim. Lee reasserted in his postjudgment motion the same ar gument as was contained in his

opposition to the motion for summary judgment, namely, that his

civil action was not time-barred. After reviewing the briefs and

record, we find no error and affirm the district court’s denial of

the 60(b) motion.

AFFIRMED

.
#### § 800.23 Delegation to the administrative law judges, Office of Administrative Law Judges.

The Board delegates to the administrative law judges the authority generally detailed in its procedural regulations at Part 821 of this chapter.

[60 FR 61489, Nov. 30, 1995]
H. Res. 495

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 24, 2002.

Resolved, That, pursuant to Article I, Section 5, Clause

2 of the United States Constitution, Representative James A.

Traficant, Jr., be, and he hereby is, expelled from the House

of Representatives.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### Augustus R. Griffin, *Receiver, etc., Respondent, v.*The Long Island Railroad Company, *Appellant.*

— Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 17, 1995 (129), Para 129.11 Winfield Scott Stratton Post Office]
[Page 1530]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.129.11  winfield scott stratton post office

  Mr. McHUGH moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 1026) to 
designate the United States Post Office building located at 201 East 
Pikes Peak Avenue in Colorado Springs, Colorado, as the ``Winfield Scott 
Stratton Post Office''.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. RIGGS, recognized Mr. McHUGH and Miss 
COLLINS of Michigan, each for 20 minutes.
  After debate,
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. RIGGS, announced that two-thirds of the 
Members present had voted in the affirmative.
  So, two-thirds of the Members present having voted in favor thereof, 
the rules were suspended and said bill was passed.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby the rules were suspended and 
said bill was passed was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
bill.
```
U.S. joint forces train with regional partners to build cohesion, strengthen defense
 
  By  U.S. Air Forces Central Command Public Affairs
  In today’s dynamic environment, U.S. Air Forces Central routinely works together with regional partners and joint forces to strengthen and reinforce the coalition's collective ability to defend the region. Last month, USAFCENT Airmen joined their U.S. Naval Forces Central Command and U.S. Army Central brethren to train with regional partners on aerial integration and defensive counter air measures. “Defending this region requires mutual respect and cohesion," said U.S. Air Force Lt. Gen. Greg Guillot, USAFCENT commander. "By combining our joint forces with resolute partners and pushing the limits of our training scenarios, we demonstrate our collective drive to promote regional stability." Throughout the scenario, service members employed a mix of U.S. Air Force fighter, tanker, electronic warfare and command and control aircraft with U.S. Navy and regional partner fighters.  The aircraft synchronized with ground-based command and control centers, weapon systems and sensor capabilities to build an integrated air and missile defense picture. “Building a resilient air picture where we can defend our essential assets requires us to react quickly with a variety of sources,” said U.S. Air Force Capt. Christopher Dunn, the event's mission commander. “Although we integrate daily, joint multi-lateral exercises test our skills in a dynamic and challenging environment.  This is essential for operational cohesion and success.” While aircraft are critical in providing protection, multiple domains must work together to provide layered defense. During the exercise, USARCENT Patriot air and missile defense system units provided a critical line of defense against simulated integrated ballistic missile defense to counter any adversary attacks. “Opportunities like this are critical in allowing our nations’ air and missile defense forces to practice the teamwork needed to defend our interests,” said U.S. Army Lt. Col. Matthew Inglis, 5-52 Air Defense Artillery Battalion commander, “Events like this confirm that we are stronger and more effective together.” Inglis added that while Patriots are one piece of the puzzle, the U.S. and partner nations face an advanced and complex threat that requires a viable mixture of combined and joint solutions. “Every time we conduct a coalition event, we affirm that our nations are committed to increasing one another's capacity and readiness," said U.S. Air Force Capt. Kaitlyn Zimmitti, U.S. Air Forces Central Strategy Plans Division officer. “As long-term security partners, we are so appreciative when we get to work side-by-side and strengthen our relationships to ensure we can protect against and counter destabilizing activities."
AMENDMENT TO INVESTORS' RIGHTS AGREEMENT


         This Amendment to Investors' Rights Agreement is made as of October 2,
2003 by m-Wise, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company").

                  WHEREAS, the Company and certain other parties have entered
into a certain Investors' Rights Agreement dated as of January 11, 2001 (the
"Agreement");

                  WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Agreement as set
forth herein;

                  WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3.2 of the Agreement, the
Agreement may be amended only with the consent of the Company, e-street
international AG ("e-street") and D.E.P. Technology Holdings Ltd ("DEP");

                  WHEREAS, e-street and DEP have transferred all of the
securities of the Company held by them to certain other parties, and have waived
all rights they have under any agreement with the Company;

                  WHEREAS, for the sake of good order, the Company has requested
the consent of the recipients of the securities transferred by e-street and DEP,
and the holders of the Series C Preferred Stock of the Company, with respect to
the amendment to the Agreement contemplated herein;

                  WHEREAS, said recipients and holders have agreed to the
amendment to the Agreement contemplated herein;

                  NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set
forth herein, the parties agree as follows:

                  1. AMENDMENT. Section 1.3 of the Agreement (together with any
references thereto within the Agreement) is hereby deleted in its entirety.

                  2. NO OTHER AMENDMENT. Except as expressly stated hereby, all
terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and
shall be unaffected hereby in so far as they do not contradict the terms of this
Amendment.




                                      -1-
<PAGE>





                        [AMENDMENT TO INVESTORS RIGHTS AGREEMENT - OCTOBER 2003]


                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment
to Investors' Rights Agreement as of the date first above written.



M-WISE, INC.



By:/s/ SHAY BEN-ASULIN
----------------------
Name: Shay Ben-Asulin

Title:


         PROTON MARKETING ASSOCIATES LLC


         By:  /s/ MATI BROUDO
         ---  ---------------
         Name:  Mati Brudo
         Title:


         PUTCHKON.COM LLC


         By:  /s/ SHAY BEN-ASULIN
         ---  -------------------
         Name:  Shay Ben-Asulin
         Title:






                                      -2-
<PAGE>




                        [AMENDMENT TO INVESTORS RIGHTS AGREEMENT - OCTOBER 2003]


                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment
to Investors' Rights Agreement as of the date first above written.



         INTER CONTENT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE INTERNET LTD.

         By:  /s/ JACOB MARENKA
         ---  -----------------
         Name:  Jacob Marenka
         Title:

         MIRETZKY HOLDINGS LTD.

         By:  /s/ MARK QUIRK
         ---  --------------
         Name:  Mark Quirk
         Title:






                                      -3-
<PAGE>
----

(2004/C 88 E/0076)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2130/03

by Markus Ferber (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(26 June 2003)

Subject:   Commission support for NGOs

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(14 July 2003)

Two contracts have been awarded to WEED e.V. under budget line B7-6000 in the context of cofinancing for non-governmental organisation (NGO) projects to raise European public awareness of development issues:

No contracts have been awarded to SHARE e.V. or to ATTAC e.V. by any budget line managed by EuropeAid.

All contracts are subject to EuropeAid's control and monitoring procedures for grants, established in accordance with the provisions of successive Commission Regulations on the implementing rules of the framework Financial Regulation.

----
#### § 594.4 Definitions.

All terms used in this part that are defined in 49 U.S.C. 30102 are used as defined in that section.

*Administrator* means the Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

*NHTSA* means the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

*Registered Importer* means any person who has been granted the status of registered importer under part 592 of this chapter, and whose registration has not been revoked.

[54 FR 40107, Sept. 29, 1989, as amended at 61 FR 51045, Sept. 30, 1996]
EXHIBIT 31.2 

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Larry W. Sayre, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed thisannual report on Form 10-K of Collins Industries, Inc.;

2.       Based on my knowledge,this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.       Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisannual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this annual report;

4.       The registrant's othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)                Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared;

(b)                Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

(c)                Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant'sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.       The registrant's other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

(a)                All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b)                Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 
| **Date:** | **January  19, 2004** | **/s/ Larry W. Sayre**                   |
|-----------|-----------------------|------------------------------------------|
|      |                  | **Larry W.  Sayre , Vice President of**  |
| ****      |                  | **Finance  and Chief Financial Officer** |