alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# ISIS Senior Leader Killed and Four U.S. Servicemembers Wounded in Helicopter Raid in Northeastern Syria

/ Published Feb. 17, 2023

Feb. 17, 2023Release Number 20230217-01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla. –**Last night, during a partnered U.S. and Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) helicopter raid in northeastern Syria, an explosion on target resulted in four U.S. servicemembers and one working dog wounded. The targeted ISIS senior leader, Hamza al-Homsi, was killed. The U.S. servicemembers and working dog are receiving treatment in a U.S. medical facility in Iraq.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 440 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 440

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4019) to provide that the 
   marriage penalty relief provisions of the Economic Growth and Tax 
         Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 shall be permanent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 11, 2002

     Mr. Hastings of Washington submitted the following resolution;

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4019) to provide that the 
   marriage penalty relief provisions of the Economic Growth and Tax 
         Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 shall be permanent.
```
Exhibit 4.1

                   Advisory and Consulting Agreement Summary

                                      Number of Options
                                      ------------------

           4.1(a)                     3,000,000

           4.1(b)                       500,000

           4.1(c)                       500,000

           4.1(d)                     1,000,000

           4.1(e)                       400,000

           4.1(f)                       400,000

           4.1(g)                       200,000

                                      ---------

     Total                            6,000,000
                                      =========
§ 604.27 Complaints, answers, replies, and other documents. ( a ) A registered charter provider, or its duly authorized representative (“complainant”), affected by an alleged noncompliance of this part may file a complaint with the Office of the Chief Counsel.
( b ) Complaints filed under this subpart shall: ( 1 ) Be titled “Notice of Charter Service Complaint”;
( 2 ) State the name and address of each recipient that is the subject of the complaint and, with respect to each recipient, the specific provisions of this part that the complainant believes were violated;
( 2 ) Be served in accordance with § 604.31, along with all documents then available in the exercise of reasonable diligence, offered in support of the complaint, upon all recipients named in the complaint as being responsible for the alleged action(s) or omission(s) upon which the complaint is based;
( 3 ) Provide a concise but complete statement of the facts relied upon to substantiate each allegation (complainant must show by a preponderance of the evidence that the recipient provided charter service and that such service did not fall within one of the exemptions or exceptions set out in this part);
( 4 ) Describe how the complainant was directly and substantially affected by the things done or omitted by the recipients;
( 5 ) Identify each registered charter provider associated with the complaint; and
( 6 ) Be filed within 90 days after the alleged event giving rise to the complaint occurred.
( c ) Unless the complaint is dismissed pursuant to § 604.28 or § 604.29, FTA shall notify the complainant, respondent, and state recipient, if applicable, within 30 days after the date FTA receives the complaint that the complaint has been docketed. Respondent shall have 30 days from the date of service of the FTA notification to file an answer.
( d ) The complainant may file a reply within 20 days of the date of service of the respondent's answer.
( e ) The respondent may file a rebuttal within 10 days of the date of service of the reply.
( f ) The answer, reply, and rebuttal shall, like the complaint, be accompanied by the supporting documentation upon which the submitter relies.
( g ) The answer shall deny or admit the allegations made in the complaint or state that the entity filing the document is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny an allegation, and shall assert any affirmative defense.
( h ) The answer, reply, and rebuttal shall each contain a concise but complete statement of the facts relied upon to substantiate the answers, admissions, denials, or averments made.
( i ) The respondent's answer may include a motion to dismiss the complaint, or any portion thereof, with a supporting memorandum of points and authorities.
( j ) The complainant may withdraw a complaint at any time after filing by serving a “Notification of Withdrawal” on the Chief Counsel and the respondent.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsGamma ray bursts: Current status of observations and theoryGamma ray bursts display a wide range of temporal and spectral characteristics, but typically last several seconds and emit most of their energy in a low energy, gamma ray region. The burst sources appear to be isotropically distributed on the sky. Several lines of evidence suggest magnetic neutron stars as sources for bursts. A variety of energy sources and emission mechanisms are proposed.Document ID19900013210Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsMeegan, Charles A.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1990Subject CategorySpace RadiationReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-100398NAS 1.15:100398Accession Number90N22526Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900013210.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# CENTCOM command team visits PSAB, reaffirms commitment to the region

/ Published Jan. 30, 2020
PRINCE SULTAN AIR BASE, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 

                U.S. Air Force Brig. Gen. John C. Walker, left, 378th Air Expeditionary Wing commander, greets U.S. Marine Corps Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr., right, commander, United States Central Command, at Prince Sultan Air Base, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Jan. 29, 2020. The CENTCOM command team’s tour of installations in the command’s area of responsibility underscores the U.S.’s commitment to regional security, the flexibility of American military power, and the importance of military-to-military relationships with coalition partners. (U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Giovanni Sims)            

                CENTCOM command team visits PSAB            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Senior Airman Giovanni Sims

VIRIN: 200129-F-KK391-101
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.179 What does the second laboratory do with the split specimen when it is tested to reconfirm an adulterated test result? ( a ) As the laboratory testing the split specimen, you must test the split specimen for the adulterant detected in the primary specimen, using the confirmatory test for the adulterant and using criteria in § 40.89 or § 40.93, as applicable and confirmatory cutoff levels required by the HHS Mandatory Guidelines.
( b ) In addition, if the test fails to reconfirm the adulterant result reported in the primary specimen, you may send the specimen or an aliquot of it for testing at another HHS-certified laboratory that has the capability to conduct another reconfirmation test.
[73 FR 35973, June 25, 2008, as amended at 88 FR 27646, May 2, 2023]
From: Joe Franklin [mailto:thegeneral@thousandacres.com] 

Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 11:09 AM 

To: Walter Lamb; EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Cc: jeff wallace; Luke Boudreaux; richard chilton; paul lichtefeld; miles hall 

Subject: Re: RIN 1210-AB33 

Walter: 

 

Well stated. I would offer one revision: last sentence, delete: "...speaks well 

of..." and replace with: "...speaks volumes about..."

 

Best regards, Joe

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Walter Lamb 

To: e-ORI@dol.gov 

Cc: jeff wallace ; Joe Franklin ; Luke Boudreaux ; richard chilton ; paul lichtefeld ; miles hall 

Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 8:55 AM 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 

The government continues to exceed their authority, violating the Constitution, and dictating again 

how we spend our money. We have no choice but to work to defeat EVERY seating elected 

official in the national government. .

 

This action or threat is the straw that will prove socialistic activity will no longer be tolerated!!!!!!!!! 

401K , IRA's or any other retirement source is not designed to prop up the disgusting practice of 

printing money with no backing. WE CANNOT SPEND OURSELVES OUT OF THIS PROBLEM.

Government waste via pork to buy votes, pay raises to government workers , and Congress not 

subject to the same laws as voters. speaks well of the arrogance of our congress. 

 

Walter W. Lamb
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 14, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130558 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130558 COA: 256190 Wayne CC: 03-012292-01 DONMISCE CLARK, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 29, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH and K ELLY , JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

p0907 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 14, 2006

Clerk
§ 630.6 Late and incomplete reports. ( a ) *Late reports.* Each reporting entity shall ensure that FTA receives its report by the due dates prescribed in the reference documents. A reporting entity may request a 30 day extension to submit its report. FTA will treat a failure to submit the required report by the due date or the extension date as failure to report data under § 630.5.
( b ) *Incomplete reports.* FTA will treat an NTD submission that does not contain all of the required data; or does not contain the required certifications, where applicable; or that is not in substantial conformance with the definitions, procedures, and format requirements set out in the reference documents as a failure to report data under § 630.5, unless the reporting entity has exhausted all possibilities for obtaining this information.
<PAGE>

                                                     Exhibit (21)-2
                                                     Commonwealth Edison Company
                                                     Form 10-K File No. 1-1839


                          Commonwealth Edison Company
                          Subsidiaries of the Company
                          ---------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               State or
                                                             Jurisdiction
                                                               in Which
                                                             Incorporated
               Name                                          or Organized
----------------------------------------------               ------------
<S>                                                          <C>
Commonwealth Edison Company of Indiana, Inc.                    Indiana
ComEd Financing I (Subsidiary Trust)                            Delaware
ComEd Financing II (Subsidiary Trust)                           Delaware
Commonwealth Research Corporation                               Illinois
Concomber Ltd.                                                  Bermuda
Cotter Corporation                                              New Mexico
Edison Development Company                                      Delaware
Edison Development Canada Inc.                                  Canada
</TABLE>
AAM-11-224-E April 14, 2011 Exemption No. 10245 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0266

Mr. Alex Bullock Windy City Flyers/Windy City Charter 1098 South Milwaukee Avenue, Suite 301 Wheeling, IL 60090

Dear Mr. Bullock:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received March 11, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Windy City Charter and Windy City Flyers (Windy City) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow Windy City, which is operating under separate parts of 14 CFR, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug testing program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Windy City.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—2

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Windy City Charter and Windy City Flyers an exemption from part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Windy City, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the conditions and limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Windy City are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the Windy City part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on April 30, 2013 unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
From: Seva Schonstrom [mailto:sms1964@live.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 9:01 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

I say no to all of this. Since social security is not going to be enough to provide even 

a modest retirement, I like many others who are neither rich but not poor either, 

took responsible steps to ensure that my retirment won't be one of poverty. I 

opened an individual retirement account for exactly one reason, it is individual not 

co-mingled. I know where my money is, what is being done with it. What guarantees 

are you giving that the money will be disbursed when I retire or in the amounts that 

I will need? 

 

Stop penalizing those of us who behave irresponsibly. We are sick of it.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsExtraterrestrial life in the universeThe possibility that life exists elsewhere in the universe, even in our own planetary system, has intrigued scientists, philosophers, and theologians for centuries. The spaceflight programs of NASA have provided much new information about our planetary neighbors and have put to rest some speculations about the existence of life on those planets or their satellites. However, there are still undetermined questions about the possibility of some form of life existing in the far distant past in our planetary system. Beyond our planetary system, the astronomical quest for scientific clues about life continues, largely via the radio telescope. Thus far there is no conclusive evidence. Here, some of the recent findings about our planetary neighbors are reviewed and the question about life elsewhere in the universe is addressed.Document ID19900013148Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsGraham, Robert W.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1990Subject CategorySpace Sciences (General)Report/Patent NumberE-5080NAS 1.15:102363NASA-TM-102363Meeting InformationMeeting: Lewis Special Summer Lecture SeriesLocation: Cleveland, OHCountry: United StatesStart Date: July 18, 1989Accession Number90N22464Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900013148.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
- Taxpayer (Kristofer Phelps)
- F2
Exhibit 32
                                                                      ----------

  Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of WidePoint Corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certify, based on their knowledge, that the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 ( the "Report"),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ STEVE L. KOMAR
------------------
Steve L. Komar
Chief Executive Officer

/s/ JAMES T. MCCUBBIN
---------------------
James T. McCubbin
Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 14, 2003
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to the requirement set forth inRule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended(the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of theUnited States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), James M. Gower, Chief Executive Officerof Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), and Ryan Maynard, ActingChief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the bestof his knowledge:

1.             TheCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2006, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “PeriodicReport”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and

2.             Theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

InWitness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of November 7,2006.
| /s/ JAMES M. GOWER       |                                                          | /s/ RYAN D.  MAYNARD |   |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
| James M. Gower           | Ryan D. Maynard                                               |
| Chief Executive  Officer | Vice President  of Finance and Acting Chief Financial Officer |

 

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q towhich it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of RigelPharmaceuticals, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after thedate of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing.

----
# November 27: Military airstrikes continue against ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published Nov. 27, 2016
November 27, 201620161127-01**SOUTHWEST ASIA —**** Syria**** Iraq**
From: Brian [mailto:bphillips@philpaint.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 5:34 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

I am outraged that the government would even consider touching my retirement accounts. I 

earned that money. It is mine and nobody, not even the federal government has a right to tell me 

what to do with it. Your job is to protect my rights, including my property rights. 

The words of our Founders are appropriate here: 

The rights of persons, and the rights of property, are the objects, for the protection of which 

Government was instituted. James Madison 

The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the law of God, 

and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny 

commence. John Adams 

Now what liberty can there be, where property is taken away without consent? Sam Adams 

To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his father has acquired too 

much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers, have not exercised equal industry and 

skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, the guarantee to everyone the free 

exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it. Thomas Jefferson
#### § 670.29 Advisories.

In any instance in which the Administrator determines there are hazards or risks to public transportation, the Administrator may issue an advisory which recommends corrective actions, inspections, conditions, limitations or other actions to avoid or mitigate any hazards or risks. The Administrator will issue notice to recipients of an advisory in the Federal Register.