alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 803.1 Description.

The official seal of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) is described as follows: An American bald eagle with wings displayed, holding an olive branch in its right talon and a bundle of 13 arrows in its left talon. Above the eagle's head is a white scroll inscribed “E Pluribus Unum” in black. The eagle bears a shield that resembles the United States flag with vertical stripes of alternating white and red and a blue top; all are within an encircling inscription, “National Transportation Safety Board”. The eagle's wings, body, and upper portion of the legs are shades of brown. The head, neck, and tail are white. The beak, lower portion of the legs, feet, arrows, olive branch, and encircling inscription are gold. When the full color seal is illustrated on print or digital media, the background of the seal must be white. When the full color seal is embroidered on official NTSB uniform items, the seal's background must be the color of the material. When the monochrome seal is used on print or digital media, the seal can be displayed in black, blue, or in white on contrasting background. When used on official NTSB uniform items, the monochrome seal can be illustrated in yellow-gold on navy blue material. The monochrome version of the NTSB's official seal appears in Figure 1.

Figure 1 to [§ 803.1](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-803.1)

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER05OC23.064/ER05OC23.064_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER05OC23.064/ER05OC23.064_original_size.png)

[[88 FR 69044](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/88-FR-69044), Oct. 5, 2023]
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 165 (Monday, August 28, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 58544]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18466]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-30-2023]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 7; Authorization of Production Activity; 
AbbVie Ltd.; (Pharmaceutical Products); Barceloneta, Puerto Rico

    On April 25, 2023, AbbVie Ltd., submitted a notification of 
proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within 
Subzone 7I, in Barceloneta, Puerto Rico.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (88 FR 27860--27861, May 3, 2023). On 
August 23, 2023, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision 
that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The 
production activity described in the notification was authorized, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including 
section 400.14.

    Dated: August 23, 2023.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-18466 Filed 8-25-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### Jerome Putnam, Respondent, v. The Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, Appellants.

Judgment and order affirmed.
1210-AB32-2-1496.html[7/26/2015 6:09:00 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwj-k8vw

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1992

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Steve Thunberg

General Comment

If you could simply fix Social Security so that when I retire I'll have that to count on as a supplement to my own

 savings. I'm not fooling myself to believe that Social Security will cover all my expenses in retirement that is

 why people should plan for their retirement, not government. I'm concerned that if the government is left to tell

 me how to save for retirement they will screw it up just like Social Security is now. By the way I received my

 S.S. statement and it now shows a disclaimer that by 2033 my payment may be considerably reduced. This does

 not give me a confident feeling that government can manage a retirement program.
NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a " * " beside the RBLC ID.

Required fields are denoted by "+".

Report Date: 05/05/2010            Control Technology Determinations (Freeform)
Facility Information: HOLCIM (US), INC.

RBLC ID: MS-0071

+ Corporate/Company Name:

+ Facility Name: HOLCIM (US), INC. Facility County: LOWNDES Facility State: MS Facility ZIP Code: 39736 Facility Country: USA Facility Contact Name: JAMES BOYD Facility Contact Phone: 6622725121 Facility Contact Email: EPA Region: 4 Agency Code: MS001 Agency Name: MISSISSIPPI DEPT OF ENV QUALITY Agency Contact: MS. CARLA BROWN Agency Phone: (601) 961-5235 Agency Email: CARLA_BROWN@DEQ.STATE.MS.US Other Agency Contact Info: DALLAS BAKER P. O. BOX 10385 HINDS, MS 39239-0385 601 961-5670

+ Permit Number: 1630-00025

+ SIC Code: 3241 NAICS Code: 327310 Facility Registry System Number: 110000377707 Application Accepted Received Date: 03/06/2002 ACT Permit Issuance Date: 08/20/2004 ACT Date determination entered in RBLC: 12/06/2004 Date determination last updated: 02/08/2005 Permit Type: A: New/Greenfield Facility Permit URL: Facility Description: THIS IS A WET PROCESS CEMENT (PORTLAND) MANUFACTURING PLANT. THE PROJECT UNDER REVIEW WAS Permit Notes: Previous PageAffected Boundaries: HOLCIM (US), INC.

Facility-wide Emissions: HOLCIM (US), INC.

+ Pollutant Name: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Facility-wide Emissions Increase: -40.0000 (Tons/Year)

Process Information: HOLCIM (US), INC.

+ Process Name: POPRTLAND CEMENT MANUFACTURING

+ Process Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: COAL Throughput: 650000.00 Throughput Unit: TON CLINKER/YR Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: HOLCIM (US), INC. - POPRTLAND CEMENT MANUFACTURING

+ Pollutant Name Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) )

+ CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified

+ Control Method Code: N

+ Control Method Description: GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICE Emission Limit 1: 10.0000 Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/T Emission Limit 1 Avg. Time/Condition: Emission Limit 2: 2625.0000 Emission Limit 2 Unit: T/YR Emission Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: Standard Emission Limit: 0 Standard Emission Limit Unit: Standard Limit Avg. Time/Condition:

+ Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Did factors, other thenDid factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions?: U

+ Percent Efficiency: 5.000 Compliance Verified: Yes Cost Effectiveness: 8,700 ($/ton) Incremental Cost Effectiveness: Cost Verified (Y/N)?: Yes Dollar Year Used In Cost Estimates: 2003 Pollutants/Compliance Notes:

Previous Page
From: clare peterson [mailto:ppurcellclare@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 2:20 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/2010-02028_PI.pdf

 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employee Benefits Security Administration 

29 CFR Parts 2509, 2520 and 2550 

RIN 1210–AB33 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Internal Revenue Service 

26 CFR Part 1 

RIN 1545-BJ04 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and 

Beneficiaries in Retirement Plans 

 

 

about this inquiry?

it's my 401k not the Governments! 

 

 M. Clare Peterson

PPURCELLCLARE@Yahoo.com

Minneapolis, Minnesota.U.S.A
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsHigh accuracy solutions of incompressible Navier-Stokes equationsIn recent years, high accuracy finite difference approximations were developed for partial differential equations of elliptic type, with particular emphasis on the convection-diffusion equation. These approximations are of compact type, have a local truncation error of fourth order, and allow the use of standard iterative schemes to solve the resulting systems of algebraic equations. These high accuracy approximations are extended to the solution of Navier-Stokes equations. Solutions are obtained for the model problem of driven cavity and are compared with solutions obtained using other approximations and those obtained by other authors. It is discovered that the high order approximations do indeed produce high accuracy solutions and have a potential for use in solving important problems of viscous fluid flows.Document ID19900012251Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsGupta, Murli M.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1990Subject CategoryNumerical AnalysisReport/Patent NumberE-5350NASA-TM-102539NAS 1.15:102539ICOMP-90-10Accession Number90N21567Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-62-21CONTRACT_GRANT: NASA ORDER C-99066-GDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900012251.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# CENTCOM Commander Visits Turkmenistan

/ Published April 25, 2023

April 25, 2023

Release Number 20230425-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla.**– On April 24, Gen. Michael “Erik” Kurilla, commander of U.S. Central Command, visited Turkmenistan. In Ashgabat, Kurilla met with the nation’s senior foreign affairs and military leaders, including:
      - Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Vepa Hajiyev
      - Minister of Defense Lt. Gen. Begench Gundogdyev
      - Chief of the General Staff Col. Akmurat Anemetov

At the same time Kurilla was meeting with these leaders in the Turkmen capital, Turkmenistan Minister of Foreign Affairs Rasit Meredow was in Washington D.C. meeting with U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken for the Annual Bilateral Consultation.

Kurilla and the Turkmen leaders discussed methods to strengthen the U.S.-Turkmenistan security partnership. The Turkmen leaders praised the State Partnership Program, established in 2021 between the Armed Forces of Turkmenistan and the Montana National Guard. The program created an enduring partnership, building training events, professional development sessions, and cultural engagements between Turkmenistan and the Montana National Guard.

They also visited the People’s Memorial and Monument Complex where Kurilla and Anemetov laid a wreath in honor of Turkmenistan’s World War II fallen. Inside the monument, Kurilla received a tour and briefing on Turkmen history. They also visited the Magtymguly Pyragy monument and Independence Monument.

“We respect Turkmenistan’s doctrine of ‘positive neutrality’ and are united in support of the territorial integrity and stability of the Central Asian states,” said Kurilla. “During this visit, I had the opportunity to not only sit, speak with, and engage in meaningful dialogue with the military and foreign affairs leadership of Turkmenistan, I also observed the wondrous Turkmen culture and had an opportunity to ride the country’s world-renowned Akhal-Teke horses.

“Visits like this allow the kind of enduring relationships that cannot be built over the phone or through a video teleconference. Such visits give me an opportunity to discuss security challenges and mutual opportunities, but also to get a glimpse of the amazing people, rich cultures, and stunning heritage across the CENTCOM region.”

-30-
§ 674.19 Certification of a State Safety Oversight Program. ( a ) The Administrator must determine whether a State's SSO program meets the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5329(e). Also, the Administrator must determine whether a SSO program is adequate to promote the purposes of 49 U.S.C. 5329, including, but not limited to, the National Public Transportation Safety Plan, the Public Transportation Safety Certification Training Program, and the Public Transportation Agency Safety Plans.
( b ) The Administrator must issue a certification to a State whose SSO program meets the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5329(e). The Administrator must issue a denial of certification to a State whose SSO program does not meet the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5329(e).
( c ) In an instance in which the Administrator issues a denial of certification to a State whose SSO program does not meet the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5329(e), the Administrator must provide a written explanation, and allow the State an opportunity to modify and resubmit its SSO program for the Administrator's approval. In the event the State is unable to modify its SSO program to merit the Administrator's issuance of a certification, the Administrator must notify the Governor of that fact, and must ask the Governor to take all possible actions to correct the deficiencies that are precluding the issuance of a certification for the SSO program. In his or her discretion, the Administrator may also impose financial penalties as authorized by 49 U.S.C. 5329(e), which may include: ( 1 ) Withholding SSO grant funds from the State;
( 2 ) Withholding up to five percent of the 49 U.S.C. 5307 Urbanized Area formula funds appropriated for use in the State or urbanized area in the State, until such time as the SSO program can be certified; or
( 3 ) Requiring all rail fixed guideway public transportation systems governed by the SSO program to spend up to 100 percent of their Federal funding under 49 U.S.C. chapter 53 only for safety-related improvements on their systems, until such time as the SSO program can be certified.
( d ) In making a determination whether to issue a certification or a denial of certification for a SSO program, the Administrator must evaluate whether the cognizant SSOA has sufficient authority, resources, and expertise to oversee the number, size, and complexity of the rail fixed guideway public transportation systems that operate within the State, or will attain the necessary authority, resources, and expertise in accordance with a developmental plan and schedule set forth to a sufficient level of detail in the SSO program.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 353 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         March 6, 2002.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 275) expressing the sense of the Congress 
that hunting seasons for migratory mourning doves should be modified so that 
individuals have a fair and equitable opportunity to hunt such birds. The first 
reading of the concurrent resolution shall be dispensed with. All points of 
order against consideration of the concurrent resolution are waived. General 
debate shall be confined to the concurrent resolution and shall not exceed one 
hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 
of the Committee on Resources. After general debate the concurrent resolution 
shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The concurrent 
resolution shall be considered as read. During consideration of the concurrent 
resolution for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord 
priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment 
has caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record 
designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed 
shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of consideration of the 
concurrent resolution for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 
concurrent resolution to the House with such amendments as may have been 
adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the concurrent 
resolution and amendments thereto to final adoption without intervening motion 
except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
From: Alex J. Pollock [mailto:APollock@AEI.org] 

Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 8:42 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: FW: Comments on Lifetime Income Options

April 22, 2010 

The U.S. Department of Labor 

Office of Regulations and Interpretations 

Employee Benefits Security Administration 

Washington, DC 20210 

Attention: Lifetime Income RFI 

 

 Re.: Comments on Lifetime Income Options 

Dear Sirs/Mesdames: 

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the very important question of the proper 

use of annuities in retirement finance. I respectfully submit the following thoughts: 

Considerations

1. Annuities can be an expensive form of investment and should not be overused. 

2. Retirement finance can be helpfully divided into savings for one’s expected life 

and longevity insurance against the risk of living longer than expected and so 

outliving the savings. Deferred annuities which begin paying at an advanced age, 

say 80 or 85, are a useful form of longevity insurance. 

3. The purchase of annuities involves substantial and fundamental timing risk. If a 

purchase of an annuity is forced at a particular point in time, and that point 

happens to be one of very low long-term interest rates, the annuity will be 

particularly expensive. Should that period be followed by one of high inflation 

and high interest rates, the annuity purchase will have been a disaster. 
Recommendations

1. Advanced age deferred annuities, or longevity insurance, are a sensible part of a 

retirement finance portfolio to address longevity risk, in addition to savings. 

2. Large purchases of annuities should not be required or forced at a single point in 

time, since this subjects the purchaser to imprudent timing and interest rate risk. 

3. It would be better to smooth the purchase of deferred annuities over time and 

over financial cycles, preferably throughout working life, for example as part of 

401(k) accounts. This would allow purchase of relatively inexpensive longevity 

insurance at younger ages. The retirement portfolio would thus build up over 

time a mix of savings and longevity insurance. 

Thank you for your consideration. It would be a pleasure to provide any other 

information which might be helpful. 

Yours truly, 

Alex J. Pollock 

 Resident Fellow 

 American Enterprise Institute 

 Washington, DC
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 23, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57521-57522]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18123]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control


Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing the name of one or more persons that have 
been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked 
Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more 
applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in 
property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and 
U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions 
with them.

DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for applicable date(s).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OFAC: Andrea Gacki, Director, tel.: 
202-622-2490; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-622-
2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; Assistant 
Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or Assistant 
Director for Compliance, Outreach, & Implementation, tel.: 202-622-
2490.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Electronic Availability

    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions 
programs are available on OFAC's website (https://www.treasury.gov/ofac).

Notice of OFAC Actions

    On August 16, 2023, OFAC determined that the property and interests 
in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following persons are 
blocked under the relevant sanctions authority listed below.
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P

[[Page 57522]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN23AU23.006

    Authorities: E.O. 13551, 75 FR 53837, 3 CFR, 2010 Comp., p. 242.

    Dated: August 16, 2023.
Andrea M. Gacki,
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the 
Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2023-18123 Filed 8-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-C
#### § 585.42 Purpose.

The purpose of these requirements is to assist the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in determining whether a manufacturer has complied with the upgraded requirements of Standard No. 301.
§ 390.32 Electronic documents and signatures. ( a ) *Applicability.* This section applies to documents that entities or individuals are required to retain, regardless of whether FMCSA subsequently requires them to be produced or displayed to FMCSA staff or other parties entitled to access. This section does not apply to documents that must be submitted directly to FMCSA.
( b ) *Electronic records or documents.* Any person or entity required to generate, maintain, or exchange documents to satisfy requirements in chapter III of subtitle B of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (49 CFR 300-399) may use electronic methods to satisfy those requirements.
( c ) *Electronic signatures.* ( 1 ) Any person or entity required to sign or certify a document to satisfy the requirements of chapter III of subtitle B of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (49 CFR parts 300-399) may use an electronic signature, as defined in § 390.5T of this part.
( 2 ) An electronic signature may be made using any available technology that otherwise satisfies FMCSA's requirements.
( d ) *Requirements.* Any person or entity may use documents signed, certified, generated, maintained, or exchanged using electronic methods if the documents accurately reflect the information otherwise required to be contained in them. Records, documents or signatures generated, maintained, or exchanged using electronic methods do not satisfy the requirements of this section if they are not capable of being retained, are not used for the purpose for which they were created, or cannot be accurately reproduced within required timeframes for reference by any party entitled to access. Records or documents generated electronically do not satisfy the requirements of this section if they do not include proof of consent to use electronically generated records or documents, as required by 15 U.S.C. 7001(c).
[83 FR 16226, Apr. 16, 2018]