alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
December 31, 1997 financial statements and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      31,744,000
<SECURITIES>                                69,952,000
<RECEIVABLES>                              108,874,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,760,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           214,867,000
<PP&E>                                      70,053,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              29,135,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             288,456,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       51,404,000
<BONDS>                                     76,912,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       178,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 158,731,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               288,456,000
<SALES>                                     85,401,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            87,281,000
<CGS>                                       52,633,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               75,535,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             820,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,926,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,481,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,445,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,445,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36
        

</TABLE>
Docket: EBSA-2010-0007 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in 

Retirement Plans 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0007-0001 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options 

Document: EBSA-2010-0007-DRAFT-0016 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: David 

Address: 

Beckley, WV, 

General Comment 

Thank you for opening these rules for comment prior to the attempted theft of my retirement 

funds. If these rules appear likely to be adopted I will: (1) cash out any and all retirement funds 

and accept the penalties, (2) convert these funds into tangible assets, beginning with precious 

metals, (3) place them in a secure location out of your reach, and (4) make the U.S. Constitution 

and free market capitalism a central theme of all my future political decisions. OK, I do #4 now. 

Thanks, again, and have a horrible life in government servitude. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: February 17, 2010 

Received: February 04, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80a8bfd5 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 2/17/2010
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-76,179-03

EX P ARTE HIGHTOWER OB RYANT, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1105383-A IN THE 179TH DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant was convicted of possession with the intent to deliver a controlled substance and sentenc ed to twenty y ea rs ’ i mprisonment. The First Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Obryant v. State , No. 01-08-00740- CR (Tex. App.—Housto n [ 1 s t Dist.] Dec

. 10, 2009) (not desig nated for publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of con v i ction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends, among other thi ng s, that trial counsel was ineffe ctive. The trial court enter ed a timely order desig nating issues and order ed trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. This application was forwa rded, howeve r, befor e the trial court made finding s o f fa ct and2

conclusion s o f l aw . We rema nd this application to the trial court to complete its evidentiar y investiga tion and make f

indings of f

act a nd conclusions of law

. The t ri al court shall make findings of fac t and conclusions of l aw within ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff id avit s, motions, objections, proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: Apr il 1, 2020 Do not publish
Coos,

Dec., 1895.

#### Amey *v.*Granite State Fire Insurance Co. *& a.,*McMulkin & *a., Claimants.*

A vendor of chattels who takes a mortgage of them to secure the purchase money may recover insurance effected for his benefit, notwithstanding his knowledge that the property is to be used by the mortgagor for an illegal purpose.

Assumpsit, on policies of insurance issued by the Granite State Fire Insurance Company, the Home Insurance Company, and the Imperial Insurance Company. The defendants admit their liability, either to the plaintiff or to the claimants, as the court may determine. /

Prior to October 24, 1893, the plaintiff was engaged in the business of bottling lager beer at Groveton, and selling the same, together with some intoxicating liquors, at wholesale, in New Hampshire and Vermont. On that day he sold the plant and stock of goods to the claimants, and executed a bill of sale thereof; and in payment therefor he took a promissory note of the claimants for $2,000, which has been paid, and four promissory notes of the claimants for $818.92 each, secured by a chattel mortgage of the property, all of the same date. The balance due on the notes amounts to more than the whole sum due from the defendants on the policies in suit. Insurance was effected on the property by the claimants for the benefit of the mortgagee as his interest might appear. The property was afterward mainly consumed by fire, and the loss adjusted by the respective companies. The consideration of the note for $2,000 included all the intoxicating liquors sold the claimants, and the mortgage notes were not taken in payment for any intoxicating *447liquors so sold. A part of the consideration of the mortgage notes consisted of machinery and articles adapted to and used in the business of bottling lager beer, and the plaintiff knew when he made the sale and took the mortgage that the claimants intended to engage in that business.

*Drew, Jordan Buckley,*for the plaintiff.

*Ladd Fletcher*and *Orawford D. Hening,*for the claimants.

Clark, J.

The plaintiff is entitled to judgment unless, as a part of the contract of sale, he did some positive act to aid the claimants in their unlawful occupation. The sale was not rendered illegal by the plaintiff's knowledge that the claimants would use the property sold for the advancement of their illegal business. *Delavina*v. *Hill,*65 N. H. 94, and cases cited; *Bryson*v. *Haley,*ante, *p.*337. No facts are found which show anything beyond the plaintiff’s mere knowledge of the intention of his vendees, and the case comes within the rule laid down in the authorities cited.

*Judgment for the plaintiff.*

All concurred.
This page is no longer being maintained. You can find a previous version at: /pubs/techbull/current_issue.html.
        - There is no guarentee that this redirect page will be maintained.
        - You will be redirected in 10 seconds.
From: ottjkh1@aol.com [mailto:ottjkh1@aol.com] 

Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2010 11:19 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

To: The Department of the Treasury, Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Adm. 

 29 CFR Parts 2509,2520 and 2550. 

 

 Where do you get the right to take monies the citizens have put aside for their retirement to do 

as they see fit, not as the government decides to do with the money???? I am totally against this 

government intrusion into my investments and savings. 

 This is a total disregard of our Constitutional Rights. An Abomination. 

 

 James K. Heller, 5876 Meadowridge Ct., Grove City, OH 43123
- T1
- T2
- T3
#### Thomas Fahey, Appellant, *v.*New Amsterdam Gas Company, Respondent.

*Fahey*v. *New Amsterdam Gas Go.,*141 App. Div. 919, affirmed.

(Argued May 21, 1912;

decided June 4, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 30, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant, his employer.

*Henry M. Eater, George F. Elliott, Jay 8. Jones*and *Edward J. Fanning*for appellant.

*I. R. Oeland*and *James B. Henney*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ. Absent: Vann, J.
From: trdugdell@att.net [mailto:trdugdell@att.net] 

Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 12:52 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA; EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Life time income for retirement accounts

I understand you are soliciting comments on this. 

Hmmm. So what is the plan. Mandate that people take some (or all) of their funds and 

purchase an annouity for lifetime income? Lets see the annuity (or whatever) "for saftey" 

( HA!) will have to have US government Bonds in it Right? Hmmm wasn't that what 

Social Security was for? Oh yeah you spent that money! 

My view 

KEEP YOUR ROTTEN HANDS OFF MY MONEY. 

The Federal Government has broken every promise it has ever made. Lets ignore the fact 

that it has no standing to make a single promise anyway. Unfortunately the people pay 

for the broken promises. The Federal Government has essentially stolen money from me 

my entire working life. Then changed the rules to assure I see none of it. It has changed 

the rules as to when I can get my funds. Debased my currency so that when (if ever) I get 

back some of my stolen funds THEY WILL PURCHASE NOTHING CLOSE TO 

WHAT THEY DID WHEN THEY WERE STOLEN which is another form of theft. 

THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS NOT WORTHY OF TRUST BECAUSE IT LIES 

THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS NOT WORTHY OF TRUST BECAUSE IT LIES 

THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS NOT WORTHY OF TRUST BECAUSE IT LIES 

THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS NOT WORTHY OF TRUST BECAUSE IT 

STEALS and what has been done with Social Security funds is theft and illegal UNLESS 

you are the Federal Government 

THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS NOT WORTHY OF TRUST BECAUSE IT HAS 

NO HONOR. Which is clearly apparent. Just because something is not illegal does not 

make it OK TO DO (see above) 

If anyone in the Federal Government ever had a shred of decency they would know that. 

I am not in favor of any government plan to take a single, thin, debased, copper- flashed 

zinc cent and place it ANYWHERE FOR ANY PURPOSE. It's not your money, It's not 

your future IT'S NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS! SO GET LOST! 

There is absolutely no way I would ever give the Federal Government another chance to 

shaft me by passing off its worthless paper for my good funds. Which is exactly what you 

want to do. The world does not want your debt, I already have too much of it myself via 

the Social Security scam. No thanks. I don't want anymore. I Do not want your worthless 

paper backed only by lies. 
The only way I would do it is if I can cash completely of of all 401(k)s and IRAs and do 

whatever I want with them. Completely without tax consequences and complete freedom. 

You give me COMPLETE CONTROL. If choose to stuff my retirement money under the 

mattress then that's it. 

HAH! LIKE THAT WILL EVER HAPPEN! 

I know you've got debt problems but stealing yet more of the capital in the country is not 

going to fix it. Which is EXACTLY what you are up to. 

Sorry. I am not playing your games anymore.
```

[House Document 106-257]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 106-257

 
                  REPORT ON RESCISSIONS AND DEFERRALS

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

                      THE DIRECTOR, THE OFFICE OF

                         MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

                              transmitting

  CUMULATIVE REPORT ON RESCISSIONS AND DEFERRALS OF BUDGET AUTHORITY, 
                      PURSUANT TO 2 U.S.C. 685(e)

June 19, 2000.--Referred to the Committee on Appropriations and ordered 
                             to be printed

                               __________

                    U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
79-012                     WASHINGTON : 2000

                 Executive Office of the President,
                           Office of Management and Budget,
                                     Washington, DC, June 12, 2000.
Hon. J. Dennis Hastert,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
    Dear Mr. Speaker: In accordance with Executive Order 11845, 
I am transmitting the cumulative report on rescissions and 
deferrals. This report is required by Section 1014(e) of the 
Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974. In 
accordance with the Act, the report is being transmitted 
concurrently to the Senate and will be published in the Federal 
Register.
            Sincerely,
                                            Jacob J. Lew, Director.
    Enclosure.
    Identical Letter Sent to the President of the Senate.
    

```
Strafford,

Dec., 1895.

#### Somersworth Savings Bank *v.*Somersworth.

The statute (Laws 1895, c. 108) authorizing a tax of three fourths of one per cent upon deposits in savings banks is valid; and a tax upon corporate stock purchased with such deposits is unauthorized.

Petition, for an abatement of taxes. Pacts agreed. Before October 1, 1895, the bank paid to the state treasurer a tax computed at three fourths of one per cent upon the amount of its deposits after deducting the value of its real estate and the value of its¡ *mortgage*loans upon land in this state, as authorized by statute. The assessors of Somersworth assessed a tax in 1895 upon shares of bank stock owned by the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs duly applied to the assessors for an abatement of this tax, which was refused.

*William F. Russell*and *Streeter, Walker §• Hollis,*for the plaintiffs.

*David R. Pierce,*for the defendants.

*Per Curiam.*
      ***

A savings bank “ shall pay to the state treasurer annually, on the first day of October, a tax of three fourths of one per cent upon the amount of the general deposits on which it pays interest, after deducting the value of all its real estate wherever situated and the value of all its loans secured by mortgage upon real estate situated in this state made at a rate not exceeding five per cent per annum.” Laws 1895, *e.*108, *s.*1. The plaintiffs fully complied with this requirement, and ask to be relieved from a further tax upon bank stock which they purchased with a portion of the deposits. The stock in fact represents the deposits which vvere used in its purchase; and to sustain both forms of taxation would be to sanction an unauthorized system of double taxation. *Nashua Savings Bank*v. *Nashua,*46 N. H. 389; *Rockingham Ten Cent Savings Bank*v. *Portsmouth,*52 N. H. 17; *National Banks*v. *Concord, post.*The claim that the statute limiting the rate of taxation of deposits in savings banks is unconstitutional is not sustained. *“*The savings-bank tax is an anomaly, resting on peculiar grounds of public policy, and is universally understood to have acquired the .position of an exception to the constitutional rule of equality.” *B., C. & M.*
      *403
      *Railroad*v. *State,*62 N. H. 648, 649. On this ground *c.*108, Laws 1895, is valid so far as its validity is a question in this case.

*Tax abated.*

All concurred.

See foot-notes on pages 22 and 376.
-----Original Message-----

From: Blake Fagan [mailto:Blake.Fagan@mahec.net] 

Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2015 6:16 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

I wholeheartedly agree with Labor Secretary. I think that all financial advisors have a fiduciary duty to 

their client

Sent from my iPhone

________________________________________________________

Confidentiality Statement

This message and its attachments may contain confidential and /or legally-sensitive information that is 

intended for the sole use of the addressee(s). Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution 

of the information contained in this message and its attachments is prohibited. If you have received this 

message or any of its attachments in error, please destroy all originals and copies of the same and notify 

the sender immediately.
June 29: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL Terrorists in Syria and Iraq
 By CJTF - Operation Inherent Resolve News Release
  June 29, 2015 Release # 20150629 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **SOUTHWEST ASIA, June 29, 2015 –**
 U.S. and coalition military forces have continued to attack Islamic 
State of Iraq and the Levant terrorists in Syria and Iraq, Combined 
Joint Task Force Operation Inherent Resolve officials reported today. Officials
 reported details of the latest strikes, which took place between 8 a.m.
 yesterday and 8 a.m. today, local time, noting that assessments of 
results are based on initial reports. **Syria** Attack, bomber, fighter and remotely piloted aircraft conducted six airstrikes in Syria: -- Near Raqqah, an airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit, destroying an ISIL crane. -- Near Hasakah, an airstrike had inconclusive results. --
 Near Kobani, four airstrikes struck two ISIL tactical units, destroying
 eight ISIL boats, three ISIL vehicles, two ISIL bunkers, an ISIL 
fighting position and an ISIL mortar system. **Iraq** Attack, bomber and fighter aircraft conducted 17 airstrikes in Iraq, approved by the Iraqi Ministry of Defense: --
 Near Beiji, two airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and land 
features denying ISIL a tactical advantage, destroying an ISIL vehicle. -- Near Habbaniyah, two airstrikes struck an ISIL logistics compound and an ISIL staging area. -- Near Haditha, an airstrike struck an ISIL large tactical unit. -- Near Makhmur, two airstrikes struck two ISIL tactical units, destroying an ISIL building and an ISIL heavy machine gun. -- Near Mosul, two airstrikes struck two ISIL tactical units, destroying an ISIL building and an ISIL vehicle. --
 Near Sinjar, three airstrikes struck three ISIL tactical units and 
three ISIL heavy machine guns, destroying four ISIL buildings. -- 
Near Tal Afar, five airstrikes struck four ISIL tactical units and three
 ISIL bunkers, and also struck land features to deny ISIL a tactical 
advantage. Two ISIL mortar firing positions, an ISIL heavy machine gun 
and an ISIL vehicle were destroyed. **Part of Operation Inherent Resolve** The
 strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the 
operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose
 to Iraq, Syria, the region, and the wider international community. The 
destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the 
terrorist group's ability to project terror and conduct operations, 
officials said. Coalition nations conducting airstrikes in Iraq 
include the United States, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, 
Jordan, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Coalition nations 
conducting airstrikes in Syria include the United States, Bahrain, 
Canada, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
# Gates visits Iraq to assess advisory brigades

/ Published July 28, 2009

TALIL, Iraq (July 28, 2009) – Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates began a previously unannounced visit to Iraq Tuesday with a stop to examine the prototype of the U.S. advisory and assistance brigades. 

The new brigade is undergoing testing at this dusty Iraqi air base in the southern part of the country. Gates also will meet with Iraqi political leaders and consult with American commanders. This is the secretary’s first look at the revamped brigades. “By the end of August next year, our change of mission really kicks in, and our presence will be built around a half a dozen advisory and assistance brigades,” a senior defense official said, speaking on background. The brigade here is a test-bed for the concept. The first brigade trained in the United States under the new set-up –– the 82nd Airborne Division’s 1st Brigade –– will deploy later this year. The brigades are a reorganization of the Army’s basic brigade combat teams, officials said, noting that after the Iraqi elections at the end of the year, these new brigades will be the mainstay of American presence in Iraq. The brigades will advise Iraqi units and will have the firepower to aid Iraqi units if necessary. The meetings in Iraq follow meetings Gates had in Washington with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki last week. In Washington, the prime minister spoke about a possible role for American troops in Iraq after 2011. The Iraqi-U.S. forces agreement calls for all American troops to be out of Iraq by Dec. 31, 2011. The senior defense official said the secretary will not talk about the role of U.S. forces in Iraq after 2011. “We have a security agreement. It calls for us to be out of Iraq by the end of 2011,” the senior official said. “The secretary did mention that he looks forward to having a normalized security relationship with Iraq.” Defense Department officials want any security relationship with Iraq to mirror relationships the United States has around the world. Small numbers of U.S. troops are in many countries around the world, training with local forces, teaching new tactics or showing how new equipment can help local militaries, the official said, and the presence of U.S. forces does not typically mean tens of thousands of personnel in bases all over the country. In the past, Gates has expressed his personal view that “he would see the need for U.S. forces to remain there after 2011,” the official said. “But obviously that is strictly predicated on a new bilateral agreement that would allow for such a thing.” For now, the official said, the question is moot, because “until the Iraqis come back and say what they need, we don’t even know if this is in the realm of the possible.”