alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 23-C


                                                                February 2, 1999





RE:   EVALUATION OF THE P&NG RESERVES OF COLUMBIA NATURAL RESOURCES (AS OF
      DECEMBER 31, 1998) CONSTANT PRICE AND COST VERSION FOR U.S. SECURITIES
      REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

As independent petroleum and natural gas consultants, we hereby consent to the
filing of this Letter Report in its entirety as an Exhibit to the 1998 Annual
Report of Columbia Energy Group to the Securities and Exchange Commission on
Form 10-K, and any Registration Statement of Columbia Energy Group, relating to
the issue of securities to the public during 1999; to the quotation or
summarization of portions of this Letter Report, subject to our approval of the
related page(s) of the documents(s), in the 10-K, the Prospectus included in
said Registration Statement(s) or the 1998 Annual Report to Stockholders; and,
subject to approval of the related page(s) of the document(s), to the use of our
name and the reliance upon our authority as experts in said Annual Report to
Stockholders, Form 10-K and Prospectus(es) and in Part II of said Registration
Statement(s). We have no interest of a substantial or material nature in
Columbia Energy Group, or in any affiliate, nor are we to receive any such
interest as payment for the preparation of this Letter Report; we have not been
employed for such preparation on a contingent fee basis; and we are not
connected with Columbia Energy Group or any affiliate as a promoter,
underwriter, voting trustee, director, officer, employee, or affiliate.


                                R. N. Johnson, P. Eng.
                                Senior Reservoir Engineer

                                /s/ K. H. Crowther
                                ------------------

                                K. H. Crowther, P. Eng.
                                Executive Vice-President
Exhibit 10.55



 




Exhibit 10.55




FIRST AMENDMENT



TO



COLE NATIONAL CORPORATION 401(k) PLAN



March I, 2002 Restatement



     The Cole National Corporation 401(k) Plan, established effective
October 1, 1993, as amended and restated effective March 1,2002, is hereby
further amended, effective as of September 1, 2003, by modifying Section 4.2
of the Plan to provide as follows:




4.2
    Amount of Tax-Deferred Contributions




The amount of Tax-Deferred Contributions to be made to the Plan on
behalf of an Eligible Employee by his Employer shall be either (i) an
integral percentage of his Compensation of not less than one percent nor
more than 35 percent or (ii) a specified monetary amount, not in excess
of 35 percent of the Eligible Employee’s Compensation, with a minimum
election of five dollars (if the Participant is paid on a weekly basis)
or ten dollars (if the Participant is paid on a bi-weekly basis). In the
event an Eligible Employee elects to have his Employer make Tax-Deferred
Contributions on his behalf, his Compensation shall be reduced for each
payroll period by the percentage or amount he elects to have contributed
on his behalf to the Plan in accordance with the terms of his currently
effective reduction authorization.


 

*    *    *




     EXECUTED
at Cleveland, Ohio this 11th day of
September, 2003.


	 	 	 	 	 
	 	COLE NATIONAL GROUP, INC.



 

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Leslie D. Dunn
 	 
	 	Title:	Senior Vice President
---------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of2 

., 1 • 

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 


PUBLICATION &. REGULATIONS 


BRANCH 


As of: August 20, 2010 

Received: August 09, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 20, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2cbdb 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-001O-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-201O-0010-0233 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: Linda Lou Schluter 

Address: 

4601 Declaration LN 

Madison, Wisconsin, United States Minor Outlying Islands, 53704 

Email: Iindalou121@charter.net 

Phone: 608-246-8414 

Government Agency: AID 

General Comment 

August 9, 2010 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status 

as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-2010­

0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

https:llfdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency IcomponentisubmitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/20/2010 
Page 20f2 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of theSE! 

regulations. 

Linda L. Schluter 

https:llfdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency1componentlsubmitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/20/2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10QSB
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         181,883
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  116,811
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,080
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               337,114
<PP&E>                                       8,583,810
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,314,182
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,748,715
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,573,734
<BONDS>                                      6,891,975
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        47,032
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,264,219)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,748,715
<SALES>                                        424,056
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               440,468
<CGS>                                          272,435
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  515,850
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,019
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             219,260
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (298,662)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (298,662)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (298,662)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 10.9
 Description of Salary and Bonus Arrangements for Certain Executive Officers
  TargetBonus Amount as aPercentage ofName and Title
    
    Base Salary
    
    Annual Base SalaryDavid
Mitchell
President and Chief Executive Officer
    
    $
    450,000
    
    
    
    100
    %(1)Richard
Chiarello
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
    
    $
    385,000
    
    
    
    
    (2)Mark
Wabschall
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
    
    $
    275,000
    
    
    
    50
    %(1)Douglas
McNitt
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
    
    $
    275,000
    
    
    
    50
    %(1)Kristin
Weller Muhlner
Executive Vice President, Product Development
    
    $
    262,500
    
    
    
    50
    %(1)
 
 (1)
    
    On July 6, 2006, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors approved the
webMethods Executive Incentive Plan (the EIP), pursuant to which fiscal year 2007 annual
bonus compensation for each of our executive officers, other than Mr. Chiarello, will be
determined. Under the EIP, two-thirds of the annual target bonus for each participant is
based on our achievement of established revenue and earnings per share goals and one-third of
the annual target bonus is based on the achievement of established individual performance
objectives. The individual performance objectives for the Chief Executive Officer are
determined by our Board of Directors, and the individual performance objectives for the other
executive officers are determined by the Chief Executive Officer in consultation with the
Compensation Committee. If we exceed our financial objectives, the actual annual bonus amount
may exceed the target bonus amount, subject to the decision of the Compensation Committee.(2)
    
    Under a separate arrangement approved by the Compensation Committee on June 15, 2006, fiscal
year 2007 bonus compensation for Mr. Chiarello is determined quarterly, based in part on a
percentage of our license revenue, total revenue and earnings per share and based in part on
our achievement of established license revenue, total revenue and earnings per share goals.
The target quarterly bonus amount for Mr. Chiarello in fiscal year 2007, assuming our
attainment of 100% of performance objectives, is $87,500. The actual quarterly bonus amount
may exceed the target quarterly bonus amount if we exceed one or more of the performance
objectives.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEarly focus development effort, ultrasonic inspection of fixed housing metal-to-adhesive bondlineAn ultrasonic technique was developed for the fixed housing metal-to-adhesive bondline that will support the Flight 15 time frame and subsequent motors. The technique has the capability to detect a 1.0 inch diameter unbond with a 90 percent probability of detection (POD) at a 95 percent confidence level. The technique and support equipment will perform within the working envelope dictated by a stacked motor configuration.Document ID19910013260Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsHartmann, John K.*(Thiokol Corp. Brigham City, UT, United States)*Hoskins, Brad R.*(Thiokol Corp. Brigham City, UT, United States)*Karner, Paul*(Thiokol Corp. Brigham City, UT, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1991Subject CategoryQuality Assurance And ReliabilityReport/Patent NumberPUBL-911382NAS 1.26:184143TWR-61684NASA-CR-184143Accession Number91N22573Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-30490Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910013260.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 831.50 Applicability of this subpart. ( a ) The regulations in this subpart apply when the NTSB is leading a marine or major marine casualty investigation.
( b ) In a marine or major marine casualty investigation led by the United States Coast Guard (USCG), this subpart applies if: ( 1 ) Upon USCG's request for assistance, the NTSB is leading an associated investigative activity; or
( 2 ) Upon coordination with the USCG, the NTSB elects to collect, test or analyze additional evidence beyond the scope of the USCG's investigation.
----

Action brought on 24 March 2004 by Wieland-Werke Aktiengesellschaft against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-116/04)

(2004/C 118/99)

Language of the Case: German

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 24 March 2004 by Wieland-Werke Aktiengesellschaft, Ulm (Germany), represented by R. Bechtold and U. Soltész, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

By the contested decision the Commission found that the applicant and five other undertakings had, by their participation in a series of agreements and concerted practices in the form of price-fixing and market sharing in the industrial pipe sector, infringed Article 81(1) EC and, as from 1 January 1994, Article 53(1) of the EEA Agreement. The Commission fined the relevant undertakings.

The applicant argues that the Commission did not take into account proportionally the size of the undertakings concerned in fixing the fine. The fine imposed on the applicant was disproportionately high relative to its total turnover. That constitutes an infringement of the principle of proportionality and contravenes the Commission's own guidelines. Furthermore, that method places small and medium-sized undertakings at a disadvantage and therefore infringes the general principle of equality and the principle of imposing penalties on a case-by-case basis.

The applicant further argues that in setting the fine sufficient account was not taken of the economic significance of the infringement as the Commission did not correctly calculate market volumes. Furthermore, the increase of 10 % per year set by the Commission based on the duration of the infringement was not properly reasoned.

The applicant also argues that the Commission's method for setting fines does not satisfy the requirement of certainty necessary for the rule of law. In particular, the calculation of the basic amount, which is made entirely without reference to the individual economic circumstances of the undertaking concerned, and the economic significance of the infringement does not allow for any practical unlimited discretion on the part of the Commission. Article 15 of Regulation No 17/62 is not compatible with the requirement of certainty and thus superior Community law. Finally, the Commission, in applying the leniency notice of 1996, disadvantaged the applicant without any discernible reason relative to other undertakings.

----
# May 29: Military airstrikes continue against ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published May 29, 2015

May 29, 2015Release # 20150529FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**SOUTHWEST ASIA –** Coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq between 8 a.m., May 28, and 8 a.m., May 29, local time. In Syria, coalition military forces conducted four airstrikes using bomber, and fighter aircraft. Separately in Iraq, coalition military forces conducted 20 airstrikes approved by the Iraqi Ministry of Defense using attack, fighter, bomber and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL terrorists.

“The Coalition strikes Daesh with extreme precision,” said Brig. Gen. Thomas Weidley, CJTF-OIR chief of staff. “The efficient application of weapons, the weapon-to-target-to-effect match and a proven Coalition strike process has combined to produce devastating effects on Daesh while at the same time gaining and maintain the trust of our partners on the ground.”

The following is a summary of the strikes conducted since the last press release:

**Syria**

         Near Al Hasakah, three airstrikes struck three ISIL tactical units, destroying an ISIL supply cache, an ISIL weapons cache and an ISIL vehicle.

         Near Kobani, one airstrike destroyed an ISIL vehicle.

**Iraq**

         Near Baghdadi, three airstrikes struck an ISIL fighting position and land features denying ISIL a tactical advantage.

         Near Bayji, five airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and land features denying ISIL a tactical advantage, destroying five ISIL vehicles, two ISIL excavators, an ISIL armored personnel carrier and an ISIL armored vehicle.

         Near Fallujah, three airstrikes struck land features denying ISIL a tactical advantage, destroying an ISIL boat, an ISIL river crossing point and an ISIL vehicle.

         Near Makhmur, three airstrikes struck an ISIL fighting position and an ISIL staging area, destroying an ISIL excavator.

         Near Ramadi, one airstrike destroyed two ISIL fighting positions.

         Near Sinjar, two airstrikes struck an ISIL large tactical unit and land features denying ISIL a tactical advantage, destroying five ISIL buildings and two ISIL heavy machine guns.

         Near Tal Afar, three airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and an ISIL mortar position, destroying an ISIL fighting position, an ISIL IED, an ISIL heavy machine gun and an ISIL mortar system.

Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely.

The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria, the region and the wider international community. The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Iraq include Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Syria include Bahrain, Canada, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and the U.S.
§ 271.403 Internal assessment improvement plans. ( a ) Within 30 days of completing its internal assessment, a railroad shall develop an improvement plan that addresses the findings of its internal assessment.
( b ) At a minimum, a railroad's improvement plan shall: ( 1 ) Describe recommended improvements (including any proposed revisions or updates to the RRP plan the railroad expects to make through the amendment process described in § 271.303) that address the findings of the internal assessment for fully implementing the railroad's RRP, complying with the implemented elements of the RRP plan, achieving the goals identified in the railroad's RRP plan pursuant to § 271.203(c), and implementing previous internal assessment improvement plans and external audit improvement plans;
( 2 ) Identify by position title the individual who is responsible for carrying out the recommended improvements;
( 3 ) Contain a timeline describing when specific and measurable milestones for implementing the recommended improvements will be achieved; and
( 4 ) Specify processes for monitoring the implementation and evaluating the effectiveness of the recommended improvements.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 03887**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 03887\03887_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03887\03887_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 03887\03887_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 03887\03887_PartA.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 03887\03887_PartB.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 03887\03887_PartC.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 03887\03887_PartD.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 03887\03887_PartH.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

03887\Certification Statement Plant ID 03887.pdf Plant certification statement x 03887\Supplemental Documents\03887_Belle River Pond-2 spd-5.pptx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03887\Supplemental Documents\03887_Belle River spd 1234.pptx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03887\Supplemental Documents\03887_BRPP Water Balance.docx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03887\Supplemental Documents\03887_New Image.PNG Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### § 655.48 Retesting of covered employees with an alcohol concentration of 0.02 or greater but less than 0.04.

If an employer chooses to permit a covered employee to perform a safety-sensitive function within 8 hours of an alcohol test indicating an alcohol concentration of 0.02 or greater but less than 0.04, the employer shall retest the covered employee to ensure compliance with the provisions of § 655.35. The covered employee may not perform safety-sensitive functions unless the confirmation alcohol test result is less than 0.02.
----

----

I Comunicações

Comissão

----

Taxas de câmbio do euro (1)

3 de Junho de 2004

(2004/C 143/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Fonte: Taxas de câmbio de referência publicadas pelo Banco Central Europeu.

----

----

Notificação prévia de uma operação de concentração

(Processo n.o COMP/M.3431 — SONOCO/AHLSTROM/JV)

(2004/C 143/02)

(Texto relevante para efeitos do EEE)

----

(1)  JO L 395 de 30.12.1989, p. 1; versão rectificada: JO L 257 de 21.9.1990, p. 13.

(2)JO L 180 de 9.7.1997, p. 1; versão rectificada: JO L 40 de 13.2.1998, p. 17.

----

----

Notificação prévia de uma concentração

[Processo n.o COMP/M.3423 — RWA/AMI/INTER-FERT (JV)]

(2004/C 143/03)

(Texto relevante para efeitos do EEE)

----

(1)JO L 24 de 29.1.2004 p. 1.

----

Rectificações

----

Rectificação à Comissão Administrativa das Comunidades Europeias para a Segurança Social dos Trabalhadores Migrantes — Taxa de conversão monetária pela aplicação do Regulamento (CEE) n.o 574/72 do Conselho

(«Jornal Oficial da União Europeia» C 136 de 14 de Maio de 2004)

(2004/C 143/04)

Na página 2:

em vez de:

«Período de referência: Janeiro de 2003»,

deve ler-se:

«Período de referência: Abril de 2004».

Na página 2:

em vez de:

«Período de aplicação: Abril, Maio e Junho de 2004»,

deve ler-se:

«Período de aplicação: Julho, Agosto e Setembro de 2004».

----
From: Dijon4@aol.com [mailto:Dijon4@aol.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 8:52 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

Socialistic and Ludicrous! Don't even think about it!!
#### § 98.3 Reports of apparent violations.

Any person may report, to the Assistant General Counsel for Environmental, Civil Rights and General Law, an apparent violation by a former employee of the Department of 18 U.S.C. 207.