alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
April 30: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL in Syria and Iraq
 By CJTF - Operation Inherent Resolve News Release
  April 30, 2015 Release # 20150430
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **SOUTHWEST ASIA –** Coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq between 8 a.m., April 29, and 8 a.m., April 30, local time. In Syria, Coalition military forces conducted six airstrikes using attack, bomber and fighter aircraft. Separately in Iraq, Coalition military forces conducted 15 airstrikes approved by the Iraqi Ministry of Defense using attack, fighter and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL terrorists. “The coalition remains undistracted in the execution of the mission, said Brig. Gen. Thomas Weidley, CJTF-OIR Chief of Staff. “Our focus continues to be dismantling and defeating Daesh.” The following is a summary of the strikes conducted since the last press release: **Syria** Near Al Hasakah, an airstrike struck an ISIL staging area. Near Ar Raqqah, two airstrikes struck an ISIL fighting position, destroying an ISIL building and an ISIL trench system. Near Kobani, three airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit, destroying four ISIL fighting positions and an ISIL armored vehicle. **Iraq** Near Al Asad, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL weapon system. Near Bayji, four airstrikes struck one large and three small tactical units, destroying three ISIL vehicles and an ISIL fighting position. Near Fallujah, an airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit, destroying three ISIL fighting positions. Near Mosul, three airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and an ISIL staging area, destroying an ISIL building and an ISIL heavy machine gun. Near Ramadi, two airstrikes struck two ISIL tactical units, destroying an ISIL fighting position and an ISIL structure. Near Sinjar, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL building and an ISIL fighting position. Near Tal Afar, three airstrikes struck three ISIL tactical units, destroying two ISIL excavators, an ISIL building and an ISIL fighting position. Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely. The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria, the region, and the wider international community. The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Iraq include Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Syria include Bahrain, Canada, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and U.S.
DOD Announces Afghanistan Force Deployment
 By None  , Department of Defense
   WASHINGTON - The Department of Defense today announced the deployment of approximately 16,000 additional forces to Afghanistan, the initial elements of the 30,000 troops authorized by President Obama on Nov. 30. An infantry battalion task force, with approximately 1,500 Marines, from Camp Lejeune, N.C., will deploy later this month. Regimental Combat Team-2, headquartered at Camp Lejuene, N.C., will deploy approximately 6,200 Marines in early spring 2010. A Marine Expeditionary Force (Forward) headquarters from I Marine Expeditionary Force, Camp Pendleton, Calif., will deploy approximately 800 Marines in spring 2010.  A Brigade Combat Team (BCT), with approximately 3,400 soldiers from the 1st Brigade, 10th Mountain Division, Fort Drum, N.Y. will deploy in early spring 2010 to conduct a training mission. Secretary Gates also approved the deployment of approximately 4,100 support forces, which will deploy at various times into spring 2010.  DoD will continue to announce major unit deployments as they are approved. For additional information on the Marine units, contact Marine Corps Public Affairs at 703-614-4309. For additional information on the Brigade Combat Team, contact Army Public Affairs at 703-614-2487.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     We have issued our report dated February 25, 2003, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report of Computer Horizons
Corp. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. We hereby consent to
the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements
of Computer Horizons Corp. on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-33665, effective
September 24, 1997, File No. 333-44417, effective February 27, 1998, and File
No. 333-48877, effective March 30, 1998) and on Form S-8 (File No. 033-41726,
effective July 16, 1991, File No. 033-59437, effective May 18, 1995, File No.
033-64763, effective December 5, 1995 File No. 333-60751, effective August 5,
1998, File No. 333-74579, effective March 17, 1999 and File No. 333-104126
effective March 28, 2003).

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
-------------------------------
GRANT THORNTON LLP
Edison, New Jersey
August 28, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 79 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         March 7, 2001.
    Resolved, That upon receipt of a message from the Senate transmitting the 
joint resolution (S.J. Res. 6) providing for congressional disapproval of the 
rule submitted by the Department of Labor under chapter 8 of title 5, United 
States Code, relating to ergonomics, it shall be in order without intervention 
of any point of order to consider the joint resolution in the House. The joint 
resolution shall be considered as read for amendment. The previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled 
by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Education and 
the Workforce; and (2) one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 11

                         COMARCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                 SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE

<TABLE>

                                                                         Years Ended January 31,
                                                     ----------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           1999                   1998                  1997
                                                     ------------------     -----------------      -----------------
<S>                                                  <C>                    <C>                    <C>     
Diluted:
   Net income....................................    $      5,683,000       $      4,875,000       $      4,665,000
   Less-- net income allocated to subsidiary
      dilutive stock options outstanding.........            (267,000)              (372,000)              (267,000)
                                                     ==================     =================      =================
   Net income used in calculation of diluted income  $      5,416,000       $      4,503,000       $      4,398,000
      per share..................................
                                                     ==================     =================      =================

Weighted average number of common shares
   outstanding during the year...................           4,608,000              4,744,000              4,766,000
Add--common equivalent shares (determined using the
   "treasury stock" method) representing shares
   issuable upon exercise of stock options and
   warrants......................................             204,000                332,000                350,000
                                                     ==================     =================      =================
Weighted average number of shares used in
    calculation of diluted income per share......           4,812,000              5,076,000              5,116,000
                                                     ==================     =================      =================

Diluted income per common share..................    $           1.13       $            .89       $            .86
                                                     ==================     =================      =================

</TABLE>
Docket: HHS-OS-2010-0015 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Comment On: HHS-OS-2010-0015-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: HHS-OS-2010-0015-DRAFT-0017 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: Earla J Roberts 

General Comment 

August 9, 2010 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status 

as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 



As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-

0010-0001). 



I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these 

regulations. 

Earla J. Roberts 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION 

As of: August 13, 2010 

Received: August 09, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80b2cb05 

Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/13/2010
----

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ William Salek       |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |                    |   |
| Name:  | William Salek           |   |
|   |                    |   |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   |                    |   |
| Date:  | March 31, 2010          |   |

----
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (6.18 MB)
 
 ESFS EOD Al Dhafra Air Base joint training
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### The People of the State of New York v. North America Life Insurance Company (Matter of Van Sinderen).

Balance for services and disbursements allowed at $1,586.67.
From: David Uskert [mailto:daveuskr@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2015 5:25 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Cc: daveuskr@gmail.com

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32 EBSA

Dear Sir or Madam:

While I appreciate the intent of the Department of Labor to protect individual investors from 

unscrupulous investment professionals, I have to take exception to those provisions in these proposed 

regulations that would stop individuals from selling stock options using IRA accounts. When used 

conservatively, option strategies such as selling covered calls can provide the investor with additional 

monthly income far in excess of what one can obtain from dividends from the same stock, without any 

increase in the risk of loss of existing savings. In today’s environment where dividend yields and interest 

rates on savings accounts, CDs and bonds are so low, removing the ability for informed individual 

investors to utilize these conservative options techniques to supplement their income, effectively gives 

us no other choice than to more quickly consume our hard earned IRA savings.

Rather than establishing one set of regulations that apply to all individuals, regardless of their 

background and skills, perhaps it would be better to consider an approach that would require individual 

investors to prove their understanding of the options techniques they wish to use. It might be beneficial 

to consider establishing some type of online certification testing (perhaps administered by brokerages 

who would have to follow standards proscribed by the government) that would demonstrate a sufficient 

level of knowledge to use such strategies.

Personally, these proposed regulations would stop me from continuing an investment strategy that 

allows me to generate enough income to support my modest retirement style of living without having to 

be concerned with whether I will outlive my savings. If I cannot continue to invest in this fashion, I may 

very well have to contact you in the future looking for suggestions on what would be an appropriate 

street corner in DC to start selling pencils 

Sincerely

David Uskert
# Aug. 27: Military airstrikes continue against ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published Aug. 27, 2015

August 27, 2015Release # 20150827FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**SOUTHWEST ASIA -** On Aug. 26, coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq. In Syria, coalition military forces conducted four airstrikes using bomber and remotely piloted aircraft. Separately in Iraq, coalition military forces conducted 21 airstrikes coordinated with the government of Iraq using attack, bomber, fighter, fighter-attack and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL targets.The following is a summary of the strikes conducted against ISIL since the last press release:**Syria*** Near Al Hawl, three airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL bunker complex, three ISIL bunkers and an ISIL excavator.* Near Kobani, one airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL fighting position.**Iraq*** Near Bayji, five airstrikes struck an ISIL large tactical unit, three ISIL small tactical units and denied ISIL an avenue of approach and destroyed 19 ISIL buildings, two ISIL vehicles, an ISIL mortar system and an ISIL weapons cache.* Near Fallujah, one airstrike destroyed an ISIL mortar tube and an ISIL vehicle.* Near Kisik, two airstrikes struck two ISIL tactical units and destroyed three ISIL fighting positions.* Near Mosul, two airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed two ISIL checkpoints and an ISIL vehicle.* Near Ramadi, two airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed two ISIL buildings, two ISIL weapons caches and an ISIL vehicle.* Near Sinjar, two airstrikes struck two ISIL small tactical units and destroyed an ISIL light machine gun and three ISIL fighting positions.* Near Sultan Abdallah, one airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL fighting position.* Near Tuz, six airstrikes struck an ISIL large tactical unit, two ISIL small tactical units and three ISIL staging areas and destroyed four ISIL fighting positions and an ISIL vehicle.Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely.The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria and the wider international community.The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Iraq include Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Syria include Bahrain, Canada, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and the U.S.
#### Hollis Russell, Respondent, v. Catherine A. Brownell, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Opi • >a by

Landon, J.
----

(2004/C 84 E/0288)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3499/03

by José Ribeiro e Castro (UEN) to the Council

(24 November 2003)

Subject:   Romano Prodi — Manifesto

The President of the Commission has written a text entitled ‘Europa: il sogno, le scelte’ explicitly directed to the Italian centre-left parties, calling on them to unite in a single list for the forthcoming European elections and act unitedly in the ensuing Parliament.

This initiative produced an immediate reaction from the Italian opposition parties, and comprehensive criticism from the parties comprising the government majority, having already been repudiated by representatives of European political groups. Italian political commentators have even stated that the Commission President was positioning himself as the possible leader of the left in Italy, with a view to the elections next June.

The Council:

Reply

(9 March 2004)

The Council has not discussed the issues raised in the Honourable Member's question, nor has it expressed any view on them. It is not therefore in a position to respond to the Honourable Member.

----
From: Kathy Hamor [mailto:khamor@capcondc.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 11:33 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule

March 30, 2011 

The Office of Regulations and Interpretations 

Employee Benefits Security Administration 

Attn: Proposed Definition of Fiduciary Regulation 

Room N-5655 

U.S. Department of Labor 

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20210 

Re: Proposed Definition of Fiduciary Regulation, 75 Fed. Reg. 65263 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

On behalf of its members, The Savings Coalition of America (Savings Coalition)[i] is 

pleased to submit comments regarding the Department of Labor’s proposed regulation 

under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”) 

that will redefine the term “fiduciary” under section 3(21) of ERISA and section 4975(e) 

of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. At the recent hearings, the 

Department of Labor heard from witnesses about concerns the financial services industry 

have with the proposed regulation. We feel that the proposed regulation will have 

unintended consequences that will be harmful to American savers; in particular, those 

who use Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs). 

IRAs are one of the most easily understood retirement savings vehicles available to 

Americans. Even so, saving for retirement and investing wisely can be complicated for 

IRA savers. The consequences of this proposal will make it more difficult for individuals 

to save for secure retirements. 

The Savings Coalition feels that the Department should address concerns raised by the 

commentators at the hearing and ensure that the final regulation addresses the following: 
 IRA providers will be able to provide education tools to saver which will help 

millions of American savers; 

 Americans who want to save for their retirements in an IRA should have 

investment options that will allow them to save and grow their funds to ensure 

more secure retirements; and, 

 Individuals saving in an IRA should not have to pay for advice with separate fees. 

The Savings Coalition urges the Department of Labor to consider the various responses 

to the comments submitted on the proposed rule as well as those made during the 

hearings. They have raised concerns that should be carefully studied as these concerns 

will affect Americans’ ability to save for secure retirements. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Kathy Hamor 

Executive Director 

The Savings Coalition of America 

2111 Wilson Blvd. 

Suite 700 

Arlington, VA 22201 

Phone: 703-351-5096 

 

[i] The Savings Coalition of America was established in 1991 to support incentives to increase personal

savings in the United States.  Its main objective is to win passage of expanded Individual Retirement

Account (IRA) legislation for all Americans.  The member organizations of the Savings Coalition represent a

wide variety of private interests including home‐building, realtors, tangible assets, trust companies, health

care industry, engineering, consumer, education and business groups, seniors groups, banking, insurance,

securities and financial services.