alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[109th Congress Public Law 124]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ124.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 2543]]

Public Law 109-124
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 208 South Main Street in Parkdale, Arkansas, as the Willie Vaughn Post 
             Office. <<NOTE: Dec. 1, 2005 -  [H.R. 3853]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 208 
South Main Street in Parkdale, Arkansas, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Willie Vaughn Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Willie Vaughn Post Office''.

    Approved December 1, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3853:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            Oct. 18, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 18, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 555.13 Basis for petition. The petition shall: ( a ) Discuss any factors (e.g., demand for the vehicle configuration, loss of market, difficulty in procuring goods and services necessary to conduct dynamic tests) that the applicant desires NHTSA to consider in deciding whether to grant the application based on economic hardship.
( b ) Explain the grounds on which the applicant asserts that the application of the dynamic test requirements of the standard(s) in question to the vehicles covered by the application would cause substantial economic hardship to each of the manufacturers on whose behalf the application is filed, providing a complete financial statement for each manufacturer and a complete description of each manufacturer's good faith efforts to comply with the standards, including a discussion of: ( 1 ) The extent that no Type (1) or Type (2) statement with respect to such standard is available in the incomplete vehicle document furnished, per part 568 of this chapter, by the incomplete vehicle manufacturer or by a prior intermediate-stage manufacturer or why, if one is available, it cannot be followed;
( 2 ) A description of the incomplete vehicle to be used to manufacture the vehicle(s) subject to the petition. This description must identify the manufacturer of the incomplete vehicle, state the incomplete vehicle's GVWR, and provide other available specifications;
( 3 ) The availability of alternative incomplete vehicles, including incomplete vehicles of different size, GVWR, and number of axles, from the same and other incomplete vehicle manufacturers, that could allow the petitioner to rely on Incomplete Vehicle Documents when certifying the completed vehicle, instead of petitioning under this subpart;
( 4 ) The existence, or lack thereof, of generic or cooperative testing that would provide a basis for demonstrating compliance with the standard(s); and
( c ) Explain why the requested temporary exemption would not unreasonably degrade safety.
[71 FR 28196, May 15, 2006]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Sterling Gas Drilling Fund 1982 first quarter 2000 10Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              10
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,575
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,585
<PP&E>                                      12,436,895
<DEPRECIATION>                            (11,794,774)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 678,706
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          259,717
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     418,989<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   678,706
<SALES>                                         81,212
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                81,212
<CGS>                                           68,233
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,233
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,979
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.67<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Other-se includes total partners' equity.
<F2>The limited partnerhip net income was allocated by catagory of partner.
The limited partner's class was divided bby the total number of
limited partner units of 14,370.
</FN>


</TABLE>
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 362

Congratulating the 2002 United States Olympic Team, Salt Lake City, the

State of Utah, the Salt Lake Organizing Committee, the International

Olympic Committee, athletes from around the world, and all the security

personnel who participated in the 2002 Olympic Winter Games in Salt

Lake City, Utah.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 6, 2002

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida submitted the following resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on International Relations

RESOLUTION

Congratulating the 2002 United States Olympic Team, Salt

Lake City, the State of Utah, the Salt Lake Organizing

Committee, the International Olympic Committee, athletes from around the world, and all the security personnel who participated in the 2002 Olympic Winter

Games in Salt Lake City, Utah.

Whereas the 2002 Olympic Winter Games in Salt Lake City,

Utah, were successfully completed;

Whereas athletes from the United States and thousands from

all over the world came together and took part in the

Olympics in the best spirit of good sportsmanship;

Whereas the United States Olympic Team, as a result of immense dedication and personal sacrifice, excelled at their
2

•HRES 362 IH

respective sports and won a record number of Winter

Olympics medals;

Whereas African-American and Mexican-American athletes

won medals for the first time in the Winter Olympics history;

Whereas the 60 security organizations entrusted with the responsibility of protecting the athletes, coaches, judges,

and spectators rose to the challenge to provide the safest

Olympic Games ever and set an impressive precedent for

providing security in the future;

Whereas athletes and fans from around the world supported

these Olympic Games in record numbers; and

Whereas the 2002 Olympic Winter Games accomplished the

principles set forth by the Olympic movement, including

the aim to ‘‘encourage the Olympic spirit of peace and

harmony, which brings the people from across the world

together around Olympic sport’’: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives extends

2 its heartiest congratulations to the members of the 2002

3 United States Olympic Team, its coaches, and officials for

4 a job well done, and congratulates Salt Lake City, the

5 State of Utah, the Salt Lake Organizing Committee, the

6 International Olympic Committee, athletes from around

7 the world, the various security agencies, and the people

8 of the Salt Lake City area for their immensely successful

9 efforts in organizing and carrying out the 2002 Olympic

10 Winter Games.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 165 (Monday, August 28, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 58619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18524]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-388, 389, and 391 and 731-TA-817, 818, and 
821 (Fourth Review)]


Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate From India, Indonesia, 
and South Korea Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the antidumping duty and countervailing duty 
orders on cut-to-length carbon-quality steel plate (``CTL plate'') from 
India, Indonesia, and South Korea would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the 
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on February 1, 2023 (88 FR 
6781) and determined on May 8, 2023 that it would conduct expedited 
reviews (88 FR 37098, June 6, 2023).
    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determinations in these reviews on August 23, 2023. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5455 (August 2023), 
entitled Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate from India, 
Indonesia, and South Korea: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-388, 389, and 391 
and 731-TA-817, 818, and 821 (Fourth Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: August 23, 2023.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-18524 Filed 8-25-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Editorial Note on Part 572
Editorial Notes: 1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 572.112 Head assembly. The head assembly consists of the head (drawing 78051-61X, rev. C) with the neck transducer structural replacement (drawing 78051-383X, rev. P) and three (3) accelerometers that are mounted in conformance to § 572.36 (c). ( a ) Test procedure. ( 1 ) Soak the head assembly in a test environment at any temperature between 18.9 and 25.6 degrees C. (66 to 78 degrees F.) and at a relative humidity between 10 percent and 70 percent for a period of at least four (4) hours prior to its application in a test.
( 2 ) Clean the impact surface of the head skin and impact plate surface, described in paragraph (a)(4) of this section, with 1,1,1 trichloroethane or equivalent prior to the test.
( 3 ) Suspend the head, as shown in Figure 51, so that the midsagittal plane makes an angle of 35 ±1 degrees with the impact surface and its anterior-posterior axis is horizontal ±1 degree.
( 4 ) Drop the head from a height of 200 ±0.25 mm (7.87 ±0.01 inches), measured from the lowest point on the head, by a means that ensures a smooth, clean release into a rigidly supported flat horizontal steel plate, which is 51 ±2 mm (2.0 ±0.01 in.) thick and 610 ±10 mm (24.0 ±0.4 in) square. The plate shall have a dry surface and shall have a microfinish of 0.2 microns (8 microinches) to 2.0 microns (80 microinches).
( 5 ) Allow at least two (2) hours between successive tests on the same head.
( b ) Performance criteria. ( 1 ) When the head assembly is dropped in accordance with § 572.112(a), the measured peak resultant acceleration shall be between 120 and 150 G's.
( 2 ) The resultant acceleration-time curve shall be unimodal to the extent that oscillations occurring after the main acceleration pulse shall not exceed 15 percent (zero to peak) of the main pulse. The longitudinal acceleration vector shall not exceed 15 G's.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondents, v. The Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburg Railroad Company, Appellants.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Follett, J., not voting.
Order entered February 18, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 22
- 00016
- CV
VICTORIA ANWUZIA , Appellant

V. CHANTAL MARSHALL , Appellee On Appeal from the County C ourt at Law No. 1

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 001
- 01178
- 2021

O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s February 17, 2022 motion for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the request and extend the time to March 21, 2022 . We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Thomas Mullins, Official Court Reporter for County Court at Law No. 1, and all parties.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2461 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2461

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the inclusion in 
               gross income of unemployment compensation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 11, 1995

 Mr. English of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. Houghton, Ms. McKinney, 
   Mr. Blute, Mr. Longley, Mr. Filner, Mr. Weller, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. 
Davis, Mr. Chrysler, Mr. Ney, and Mr. Ensign) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the inclusion in 
               gross income of unemployment compensation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Unemployment Tax Repeal Act of 
1995''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF TAX ON UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 85 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
hereby repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Subsection (p) of section 3402 of such Code is amended 
        by striking paragraph (2) and by redesignating paragraph (3) as 
        paragraph (2).
            (2) Section 6050B of such Code (relating to returns 
        relating to unemployment compensation) is hereby repealed.
            (3) The table of sections for part II of subchapter B of 
        chapter 1 of such Code is amended by striking the item relating 
        to section 85.
            (4) The table of sections for subpart B of part III of 
        subchapter A of chapter 61 of such Code is amended by striking 
        the item relating to section 6050B.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts received after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 821.24 Initiation of proceeding. ( a ) *Petition for review.* Where the Administrator has denied an application for the issuance or renewal of an airman certificate, the applicant may file with the Board a petition for review of the Administrator's denial. The petition must be filed with the Board within 60 days after the date on which notice of the Administrator's denial was served on the petitioner.
( b ) *Form and content of petition.* The petition may be in letter form. It shall identify the Administrator's certificate denial action, and contain a complete but concise statement of the reasons why the petitioner believes the certificate denial was erroneous.
( c ) *Answer to petition.* The Administrator shall file an answer to the petition for review within 20 days after the date of service of the petition. The answer shall specifically address each of the reasons set forth in the petition as to why the petitioner believes the certificate denial was erroneous.
( d ) *Stay of proceeding pending request for special issuance (restricted) medical certificate.* The Board lacks the authority to review requests for special issuance (restricted) medical certificates, or to direct that they be issued. Where a request for a special issuance certificate has been filed with the Administrator pursuant to the Federal Aviation Regulations, the Board will, upon the petitioner's written request, hold a petition for review of a denial of an unrestricted medical certificate in abeyance pending final action by the Administrator on the special issuance request, but for no longer than 180 days after the date on which the unrestricted medical certificate denial was issued.
( e ) *New evidence.* Where review of a denial of an unrestricted medical certificate is at issue, if the petitioner has undergone medical testing or evaluation in addition to that already submitted or known to the Administrator, and wishes to introduce the results into the record, such new medical evidence must be served on the Administrator at least 30 days prior to the hearing. Absent good cause, failure to so timely serve the new medical evidence on the Administrator will result in the exclusion of such evidence from the record. The Administrator may amend his or her answer to respond to such new medical evidence within 10 days after the date on which he or she was served therewith.
H. Res. 391

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 18, 2002.

Resolved, That the following Members be, and are hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the House

of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE: Mr.

Wilson of South Carolina.

COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Mr. Sullivan of Oklahoma.

Attest:

Clerk.
November 3, 2014 

Mr. Michael F. Martin 

US Dept. ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

PO BOX 490 

SCOTTSBLUFF. NE 69363 

FAX 308-632-5634 

1·80CH358-40{::2 

RE: Essential Air Service for Western Nebraska 

Dear Mr. Martin: 

CHEYENNE, WY 

221 EAST STREET 

CHEYENNE, WY 82007 

307·f>38-3911 

FAX 307-€32-3275 

1 -866-600-3911 

As a mernber of the Scottsbluff/Gering United Chamber of Commerce represents over four hundred businesses. 

We support the Essential Air Service bid from Aerodynamics Inc. The Western Nebraska Regional Airport 

Board held a special board meeting on October 22, 2014 and shared information on the four bids. ADI is the 

only qualified bid that will ensure dependable, affordable service for Western Nebraska 

Transportation is a key element that determines the success and future of a community. Scottsbluff/Gering is a 

regional hub that offers retail professional services and health care for Western Nebraska and Eastern Wyoming. 

A regional airport with dependable flights to Denver International Airport is vital for our community. 

We urge the US Department of Transportation to accept the Essential Airport Service bid from Aerodynan1ics 

Inc. 

Sincerely, 

~~ j 

I 

Mark Gillam 

Chairman 

Floyd's Truck Center, Inc. 

Eddie's Truck Center, Inc. 

WmERN STAR TRUCKS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       5,544,703
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,407,311
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,013,572
<PP&E>                                         401,163
<DEPRECIATION>                                  99,263
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,062,540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,165,678
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,729
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,885,132
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,062,540
<SALES>                                      1,524,324
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,524,324
<CGS>                                          466,808
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  466,808
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,771,943
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,855
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (681,731)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (681,731)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (681,731)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)
        

</TABLE>
§ 585.133 Reporting requirements. ( a ) *Phase-in reporting requirements.* Within 60 days after February 28, 2021, each manufacturer shall submit a report to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration concerning its compliance with the requirements of Standard No. 141, Minimum Sound Requirements for Hybrid and Electric Vehicles (49 CFR 571.141), for its vehicles produced from March 1, 2020 to February 28, 2021. Each report shall provide the information specified in paragraph (b) of this section and in § 585.2.
( b ) Phase-in report content— ( 1 ) Basis for phase-in production goals. Each manufacturer shall provide the number of hybrid vehicles and electric vehicles manufactured in the current production year or, at the manufacturer's option, in each of the three previous production years. A manufacturer that is, for the first time, manufacturing vehicles for sale in the United States must report the number of vehicles manufactured during the current production year.
( 2 ) Production of complying vehicles—
Each manufacturer shall report for the production year being reported on, and each preceding production year, to the extent that vehicles produced during the preceding years are treated under Standard No. 141 as having been produced during the production year being reported on, information on the number of vehicles that meet the requirements of Standard No. 141, Minimum Sound Requirements for Hybrid and Electric Vehicles (49 CFR 571.141). [81 FR 90521, Dec. 14, 2016, as amended at 83 FR 8198, Feb. 26, 2018; 85 FR 54281, Sept. 1, 2020]