alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 374.311 Service responsibility. ( a ) *Schedules.* Carriers shall establish schedules that can be reasonably met, including connections at junction points, to serve adequately all points.
( b ) *Continuity of service.* No carrier shall change an existing regular-route schedule without first displaying conspicuously a notice in each facility and on each bus affected. Such notice shall be displayed for a reasonable time before it becomes effective and shall contain the carrier's name, a description of the proposed schedule change, the effective date thereof, the reasons for the change, the availability of alternate service, and the name and address of the carrier representative passengers may contact.
( c ) *Trip interruptions.* A carrier shall mitigate, to the extent possible, any passenger inconvenience it causes by disrupting travel plans.
( d ) *Seating and reservations.* A carrier shall provide sufficient buses to meet passengers' normal travel demands, including ordinary weekend and usual seasonal or holiday demand. Passengers (except commuters) shall be guaranteed, to the extent possible, passage and seating.
( e ) *Inspection of rest stops.* Each carrier shall inspect periodically all rest stops it uses to ensure that they are clean.
[55 FR 11199, Mar. 27, 1990. Redesignated at 61 FR 54709, Oct. 21, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 15423, Apr. 1, 1997; 66 FR 49871, Oct. 1, 2001; 74 FR 2901, Jan. 16, 2009]
§ 673.15 Coordination with metropolitan, statewide, and non-metropolitan planning processes. ( a ) A State or transit agency must make its safety performance targets available to States and Metropolitan Planning Organizations to aid in the planning process.
( b ) To the maximum extent practicable, a State or transit agency must coordinate with States and Metropolitan Planning Organizations in the selection of State and MPO safety performance targets.
-----Original Message-----

From: Jon Tompkins [mailto:jontompkins41@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 6:09 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: 1210-AB32. Advisers should put you first

Labor Secretary: Mr. Thomas Perez. All financial 

advisers including broker-dealers should have a fiduciary duty not only for retirements accounts but also 

for taxable accounts so that they act in their clients best interest. Retirement and taxable accounts 

should have a accurate report showing the dollar amount of fees being charged for their services at least 

on a yearly basis. Under the present system the investor does not know the dollar amount they are 

being charged by mutual funds or broker-dealers for their accounts. This would allow them to compare 

costs between different advisers. Sincerely, 

Jon S. Tompkins

Sent from my iPad
March 16 1998
The Board of Directors
Silverado Gold Mines Ltd.
Suite 505
1111 West Georgia Street
Vancouver BC V6L 4M3





We consent to the use of our reports  included in the Form 1OK of Silverado Gold
Mines Ltd. (formerly Silverado Mines Ltd.) for the year ended November 30, 1997.

Our auditors report referred to in the preceding  paragraph is supplemented by a
report entitled "Comments By Auditors For U.S. Readers On Canada-U.S.  Reporting
Conflict" that states that Canadian reporting  standards do not permit reference
to uncertainties such as the Company's ability to continue as a going concern as
discussed  in Note  1(a)  to the  consolidated  financial  statements  when  the
uncertainties  are  adequately   disclosed  in  the  financial   statements  and
accompanying  notes. Under United States reporting  standards such uncertainties
would be described in an explanatory paragraph following the opinion paragraph.



/s/ KPMG
KPMG

Chartered Accountants Vancouver, Canada

March 16 1998
#### § 585.32 Purpose.

The purpose of these reporting requirements is to assist the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in determining whether a manufacturer has complied with the requirements of Standard No. 208 when using the child restraint systems specified in Appendix A-1 of that standard.
H. Res. 422

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 15, 2002.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4737) to reauthorize

and improve the program of block grants to States for temporary assistance for needy families, improve access to quality child care, and for other purposes. The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. The previous question shall

be considered as ordered on the bill and on any amendment

thereto to final passage without intervening motion except:

(1) two hours of debate on the bill, with 50 minutes equally

divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on Ways and Means, 40 minutes

equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking

minority member of the Committee on Education and the

Workforce, and 30 minutes equally divided and controlled by

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee

on Energy and Commerce; (2) an amendment in the nature

of a substitute printed in the report of the Committee on
2

•HRES 422 EH

Rules accompanying this resolution, if offered by Representative Cardin of Maryland or his designee, which shall be in

order without intervention of any point of order, shall be considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for one

hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an

opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without

instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0932.html[7/21/2015 6:24:49 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-s71i

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0932

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I have been working and living a frugal lifestyle my entire life, as I saved for my retirement. I don't need the DOJ

 to tell me how to manage my retirement savings. Keep your hands off my hard earned money.
Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group Transits the Strait of Hormuz
 
  By Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Amber Smalley
  ARABIAN GULF – The Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group (ABECSG) completed a scheduled transit through the Strait of Hormuz into the Arabian Gulf, Nov. 19. The Strait of Hormuz is one of the busiest shipping lanes in the world, with one-fifth of the world’s energy supply transiting through the strait annually. This waterway is critical to ensuring and safeguarding the stability of global commerce. “I’m incredibly proud of the Abraham Lincoln Strike Group Sailors and the professionalism they have demonstrated throughout this deployment,” said Rear Adm. Michael Boyle, commander, Carrier Strike Group (CSG) 12. “Especially in evolutions like a strait transit, where detailed planning, precision navigation and the proficiency of our warfighting teams are on full display.” ABECSG presence in the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations (AOO), where it has operated since May, demonstrates the U.S. and its regional partners’ commitment to the free flow of commerce, regional maritime security and freedom of navigation. “A carrier brings immense capabilities wherever it goes,” said Capt. Walter Slaughter, commanding officer of USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72), the flagship of ABESG. “We place ourselves where we need to be, when we need to be there, in order to meet the full range of maritime security requirements of the mission at hand.” The U.S. 5th Fleet AOO encompasses about 2.5 million square miles of water and includes the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, Red Sea and parts of the Indian Ocean. The expanse is comprised of 20 countries and includes three critical choke points at the Strait of Hormuz, the Suez Canal and the Strait of Bab al Mandeb at the southern tip of Yemen. Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group is deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet AOO in support of naval operations to ensure maritime stability and security in the Central Region, connecting the Mediterranean and the Pacific through the western Indian Ocean and three strategic choke points. With Abraham Lincoln as the flagship, deployed strike group assets include staffs, ships and aircraft of CSG 12, Destroyer Squadron (DESRON) 2, USS Leyte Gulf (CG 55) and Carrier Air Wing (CVW) 7.
§ 661.9 Application for waivers. ( a ) This section sets out the application procedures for obtaining all waivers, except those general exceptions set forth in this part for which individual applications are unnecessary and those covered by 49 U.S.C. 5323(j)(2)(C). The procedures for obtaining an exception covered by 49 U.S.C. 5323(j)(2)(C) are set forth in § 661.11 of this part.
( b ) A bidder or offeror who seeks to establish grounds for an exception must seek the exception, in a timely manner, through the grantee.
( c ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, only a grantee may request a waiver. The request must be in writing, include facts and justification to support the waiver, and be submitted to the Administrator through the appropriate Regional Office.
( d ) FTA will consider a request for a waiver from a potential bidder, offeror, or supplier only if the waiver is being sought under § 661.7 (f) or (g) of this part.
( e ) The Administrator will issue a written determination setting forth the reasons for granting or denying the exception request. Each request for an exception, and FTA's action on the request, are available for public inspection under the provisions of 49 CFR part 601, subpart C.
[56 FR 932, Jan. 9, 1991, as amended at 71 FR 14117, Mar. 21, 2006; 72 FR 53697, Sept. 20, 2007]
#### § 800.36 Petitions for extension of time to comment.

A petition for extension of the time to submit comments must be received not later than 10 days before the end of the comment period stated in the notice. The petition must be submitted to: General Counsel, National Transportation Safety Board, 490 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 20594-2003. The filing of the petition does not automatically extend the time for petitioner's comments. Such a petition is granted only if the petitioner shows good cause for the extension, and if the extension is consistent with the public interest. If an extension is granted, it is granted to all persons, and the NTSB will publish a notice of the extension of the comment period in the Federal Register.
# May 27: Military airstrikes continue against ISIS terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published May 27, 2017
20170527-01**SOUTHWEST ASIA —**
Strafford,

Dec., 1894.

#### Hayes *& a. v.*Rollins *& a.*Colbath *v.*Rollins & *a.*

The marriage of persons within the prohibited degrees is void, and the survivor of such marriage takes no portion of the other’s estate.

Bills in Equity, to determine the rights of the parties in property in which Samuel E. Colbath claimed an interest as the surviving husband of Carrie J. Colbath. Facts found by the court. Samuel E. and Carrie J. were cousins. Both resided in this state at the time of their marriage here in 1889, and thereafter until her decease.

*George E. Cochrane,*for C. E. and M. B. Hayes.

*Cogswell Blaekstone,*for Hollins and Cate, trustees.

*Eelker Pearl,*for Samuel É. Colbath.

"Wallace, J.

The statute in force at the time of the marriage in question prohibited the marriage of cousins (Gr. L.,'c. 180, *ss.*1, 2), and provided that “ Every marriage contracted by parties within the degrees prohibited by the two preceding sections is incestuous and void, and the issue of such marriage illegitimate.” Gl. L., *c.*180, *s.*8. It also provided that “ All marriages prohibited by law on account of the consanguinity or affinity of the parties, ... if solemnized in this state, shall be absolutely void without any decree of divorce or other legal process.” Gr. L , *c.*182, *s. 1.*

Under the common law, the canonical impediments of consanguinity and affinity only rendered a marriage voidable. Until set aside, it was practically valid. Some of the American courts, following this doctrine, have construed statutes declaring such marriages void as meaning voidable, when such construction *192was not expressly precluded by the terms of the statute. 1 Bish. Mar. & Div., *ss.*105, 112, 320. But our statute, which expressly provides that marriages within the prohibited degrees shall be absolutely void without any decree of divorce or other legal process, fenders this marriage void. It is impossible to put any other construction upon the statute without doing violence to the English language, and defeating the clearly expressed intention of the legislature. *Blaisdell*v. *Bickum,*139 Mass. 250. The marriage between these parties being absolutely void without any judicial process or decree, Samuel E. can take thereby no interest in the estate of Carrie J.

*Case discharged.*

All concurred.
<PAGE>   1
                 COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

            Exhibit 23 - Consent of Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Forms S-8 No. 33-43841, No. 33-27213, and No. 333-15929) of our
report dated August 3, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Comprehensive Care Corporation and subsidiaries included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended May 31, 2001.



/s/ Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP

New York, New York
August 23, 2001
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 8/31/15 

Received: August 27, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8ksf-61ks

Comments Due: September 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule- Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-4964

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Barbara Tucker

Address: 

Insight Financial Group

6386 Jackson Road

Ann ARbor, MI, 48103

Email: batucker@financialguide.com

Phone: 7342143980

General Comment

So perhaps it would be useful to say I am a lifelong card-carrying Democrat, and want to caution 

you not to regard this as a partisan issue. 

In our firm we believe it is the hidden nature of fees and expenses that make investors wary and 

untrusting. If DOL were to work with the industry to come up with a clear and simple model or 

regulation for disclosing all fees, people would understand and decide if and how much they 

think is fair to pay for expertise. 

Why would you assume the commission model causes unsuitable recommendations? The 

alternative model, an annual fee, uses cooky cutter investment sets, without regard to an 

individual's specific needs, and is more expensive. It is truly an annuity for the advisor, who can 

then ignore the client, since he/she is not actually tailoring the investments to their needs 
anyway. 

How would you create a system of 'unbiased' advice? Is a doctor's advice unbiased? How about a 

contractor? 

I would urge you to learn more about the industry, how financial advisors work, and judge them 

by their outcomes. I's sure you would agree that having a specific title doesn't make a person 

more or less unbiased or scrupulous; the person's moral compass does. How about making fees 

more transparent? How about using whether clients meet their goals and comparing their costs to 

alternatives to determine which advisors do the best job. 

Perhaps something needs to be done, but work with the industry to come up with reforms that 

make sense.

In our firm, we are very weary of having to overcome the bad practices in our industry, and make 

sure those we meet with know the exact details of the various fee structures, and the one we use. 

Most become clients, and when they see ours is cheaper, more tailored to their needs, and 

accomplishes their goals, they feel it is fair to all parties. It is not the amount,- it is the hidden or 

confusing nature of the fees that makes most people wary.

Every time I have learned about a new compliance rule or idea for financial advisors, I ask 

myself: if Bernie Madoff had followed this rule would he still have been able to defraud his 

clients? The answer is always 'yes'. 

Thank you for your attention. 

Barbara Aiello Tucker

Financial Planner

Insight Financial Group

6386 Jackson Road

Ann Arbor, MI 48103

734-214-3980 ext. 0577 ph

734-214-3983 fax

734-368-5076 cell

batucker@financialguide.com
#### Henry C. Albee, Respondent, v. Stephen B. Carroll, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed; no opinion.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 510

Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 26, 2002

Mr. ARMEY submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating majority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following Member be and is hereby

2 elected to the following standing committee of the House

3 of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE: Mr. Gekas of Penn5 sylvania.

Æ
Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, W ashington 98057 - 3356

October 30 , 2012 Mr. Douglas M. Lane ODA Deput y Lead Administrator The Boeing Compan y P.O. Box 3707 MC 03 - 56 Seattle, WA 98124 - 2207 Dear Mr. Lane : We have received your October 16, 2012, petition for exemption from the requirements of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 25.981(a)(3) and 25 - 901(c) for the 767 - 200/ - 300/ - 300F/ - 400ER airplane s . The exemption, if granted, would allow the planned changes to the Fuel Quantity Indication Sy stem (FQI S). This request, which you submitted to the Department of Transportation’s Federal Docket Management S ys tem (FDMS), has been given Docket No. FAA - 201 2 - 1132 . We are in the process of reviewing your request and will contact you if we need further information . A summary

of your petition will be published in the Federal Register for public comment, in accordance with the requirements of § 11.85. You will be advised of the agency ’s decision on your petitions as soon as possible. Please be advised that, per a statement in the letter you submitted , the information that was attached co ntains company proprietary information, which is available for public viewing at th e FDMS s ite. You may want to submit a revised document to FDMS, without such information , and ask them to replace your original submissio n. I f you have an y questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please contact Mike Dostert by

phone at 425 - 227 - 2132 or by e - mail at mike.dostert @faa.gov. Sincerel y, Theresa White Transport Airplane Directorate Aircraft Certi fication Service
§ 80.11 Investment-grade ratings. ( a ) At the time a project sponsor submits an application, the DOT shall require a preliminary rating opinion letter. This letter is a conditional credit assessment from a nationally recognized credit rating agency that provides a preliminary indication of the project's overall creditworthiness and that specifically addresses the potential of the project's senior debt obligations (those obligations having a lien senior to that of the TIFIA credit instrument on the pledged security) to achieve an investment-grade rating.
( b ) The full funding of a secured (direct) loan, loan guarantee, or line of credit shall be contingent on the assignment of an investment-grade rating by a nationally recognized bond rating agency to all project obligations that have a lien senior to that of the Federal credit instrument on the pledged security.
( c ) Neither the preliminary rating opinion letter nor the formal credit rating should reflect the effect of bond insurance, unless that insurance provides credit enhancement that secures the TIFIA obligation.
( d ) The project sponsor must annually provide, at no cost to the Federal Government, ongoing credit evaluations of the project and related debt obligations, including an annual assessment of the TIFIA credit instrument. The evaluations are to be performed by a nationally recognized credit rating agency and provided to the DOT throughout the life of the TIFIA credit instrument. In addition, the project sponsor will furnish the DOT with any other credit surveillance reports on the TIFIA-assisted project as soon as they are available.
[64 FR 29750, June 2, 1999, as amended at 65 FR 44939, July 19, 2000]
```

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                               ACCOUNTANTS CONSENT

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Collins Industries, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-24647  and No.  333-24651)  on Form S-8 of Collins  Industries,  Inc. of our
report dated July 28, 2005, with respect to the  consolidated  balance sheets of
Collins  Industries,  Inc.  as of October  31,  2004 and 2003,  and the  related
consolidated  statements  of  income  and  comprehensive  income,  shareholders'
investment and cash flows for each of the years in the  three-year  period ended
October 31, 2004, which report appears in the October 31, 2004, annual report on
Form  10-K of  Collins  Industries,  Inc.  Our  reports  refer to the  Company's
restatement of the consolidated financial statements for the years ended October
31, 2003 and 2002 and includes an explanatory paragraph which refers to the fact
that the Company has  restated its  consolidated  financial  statements  for the
years ended  October 31, 2003 and 2002 and a change in  accounting  for goodwill
and other intangible assets in 2003.

KPMG LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
July 28, 2005
```
# 3,000 Sailors and Marines Arrive in Middle East aboard USS Bataan, USS Carter Hall 

/ Published Aug. 7, 2023
MANAMA, Bahrain , 
More than 3,000 U.S. Sailors and Marines of the Bataan Amphibious Ready Group (ARG) and 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) arrived in the Middle East, Aug. 6, as part of a pre-announced Department of Defense deployment.

Amphibious assault ship USS Bataan (LHD 50) and dock landing ship USS Carter Hall (LSD 50) entered the Red Sea after transiting from the Mediterranean Sea through the Suez Canal. Bataan ARG/26th MEU units bring to the region additional aviation and naval assets, as well as more U.S. Marines and Sailors, providing greater flexibility and maritime capability to U.S. 5th Fleet.

An amphibious assault ship can carry more than two dozen rotary-wing and fixed-wing aircraft, including MV-22 Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft and AV-8B Harrier attack jets in addition to several amphibious landing craft. A dock landing ship also supports operations for various rotary-wing aircraft, tactical vehicles and amphibious landing craft.

The Bataan ARG departed Norfolk, Virginia on July 10 with Amphibious Squadron 8, Fleet Surgical Team 8, Tactical Air Control Squadron 21, Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron 26, Assault Craft Unit 4, Beach Master Unit 2 and the 26th MEU.

The 26th MEU, based in Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, is capable of conducting amphibious missions, crisis response and limited contingency operations to include enabling the introduction of follow-on forces and designated special operations.

The U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations encompasses approximately 2.5 million square miles of water space and includes the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, Red Sea, parts of the Indian Ocean and three critical choke points at the Strait of Hormuz, Suez Canal and Strait of Bab al-Mandeb.