alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United Arab Emirates and U.S. Central Command host counter-WMD exercise
 By None  , U.S. Central Command
  U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Robert Catalanotti, director, Exercises and Training Directorate J-7, U.S. Central Command, talks with Jordanian Col. Mekhled Al-Suheim during the Table Top Exercise portion of Leading Edge 13 at the Armed Forces Officers Club Feb. 4, 2013. (Photo by Sgt. Leon M. Branchaud)
 ABU DHABI, UAE (February 6, 2013) — The United Arab Emirates and United States are co-hosting a multilateral Proliferation Security Initiative exercise with operational expert group members and other international PSI partners from Jan. 27 to Feb. 7 in Abu Dhabi, UAE. Named LEADING EDGE, the goal of this exercise is to provide an opportunity for nations to focus on critical elements of the Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)-interdiction process. The exercise will include forums and workshops to discuss improvement of WMD interdiction Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs) and consult on related challenges. Through Field Training Exercises for interoperability development, some participating countries will execute a demonstration of regional/international resolve to prevent WMD and WMD-related materials proliferation using military-to military engagements, and familiarization with coalition equipment, aircrafts and ships. Approximately 450 people from more than 29 nations will participate in Exercise LEADING EDGE, which has been conducted twice before in October 2006 and January 2010. “It is very appropriate that the Proliferation Security Initiative exercise is being held here, as UAE is a crossroads for the world,” said the Honorable Michael H. Corbin, U.S. Ambassador to the United Arab Emirates, who welcomed the participants during the opening ceremony. “We also recognize the UAE for its longtime global leadership in proliferation security and for conducting numerous Weapons of Mass Destruction proliferation material interdictions,” said Maj. Gen. Robert G. Catalanotti, Exercise Director U.S. Central Command.  “On behalf of the U.S. Government, I extend our appreciation to all 102 endorsing nations, and we encourage non-endorsing nations to join the Proliferation Security Initiative community.” PSI was initiated in 2003 as a global cooperative effort that aims to stop trafficking in Weapons of Mass Destruction, their delivery systems and related materials.  Since establishment, more than 100 countries have endorsed the PSI Statement of Interdiction Principles. Poland will host the next event, taking place on the 10th anniversary of PSI, in May 2013. The public is encouraged to follow the exercise through images posted on: http://www.dvidshub.net/feature/LeadingEdge
~---'---------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of 1 

AUG 1 8 2010 


"LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 

PUBLICATION &. REGULATIONS 

BRANCH 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION 

As of: August 18, 2010 

Received: August 09, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 18, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2cb06 

Comments Due: August 16, 2010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-201O-001O-0151 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: Kirk Korley 

Address: 

1105 Dawson Road 

Chapel Hill, NC, 27516 

Email: kirkkorley@gmail.com 

Phone: 919-929-4567 

-------------------------------------------------------------1---­

General Comment 

See attached file(s) 

Attachments 

IRS-2010-0010-0151.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

http://fdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency/componentlsubmitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/1812010 
8/9/10 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-20 J0­

0010-00(1) . 

I believe the consumer protections included as part ofthe new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these 

regUlations. 

Kirk Korley
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1490 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 26 ) IV-B-2 8 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 8/4/200811:51:46

AM Sheet 26 of 273P. 2

MEMORANDU M TO : Docke t

for th e Reinforce dPlasti c Composite s NESHA P FROM : KeithBarnett , Environmental Protectio n Agenc y DATE : February 7 , 200 3 SUBJECT : Exemptio n t o requiremen t t o cove r mixer s for

th e polymer

castin g industry . A t proposal , w e place dth e followin g exemptio n int o th e rule : "Container s o f

5 gallon s o r

les s ma y b e ope n whe n activ e mixing i s takin g place , o r durin g period s whe n the y ar e in proces s (i.e. , the y ar e activel y bein g use dt o apply resin) . Fo r polymer castin g mixin g operations , container s o f 2 1 gallon s o r

les s ma y b e ope n whil e activ e mixin g i s takin g place. " Th e reaso n fo r

th e exemptio n for

polymer castin g was for

thi s segment

ofth e reinforce dplasti c composite s industry , facilitie s typicall y mix color s in container s u p t o 2 1 gallons . I t i s necessar

y t o visually observ e th e mixin g proces s t o insur e th e fina l mixtur e colo r

i s uniform . Therefore , the y canno t

cove r thes e container s durin g th e mixin g process . W e receive dnumerou s comment s afte r proposa l tha t

th e typical container s i

n th e industr

y use dt o mix color s wer e actuall y 21. 6 gallons , no t 2 1 gallons . Becaus e w e believ e tha t

evaporatio n durin g mixin g i s mor e afunctio n o f surfac e are athan volume , w e decide dt o chang e th e basi s ofth e exemptio n t o surfac e are aofth e mixer . Dat afroma

n equipmen t

vendo r indicate s tha t

th e type s o f

container s use dt o mi x color s i n polymer castin g wen t

u p t o a23. 5 inc hinternal diameter . Surfac e are a= (23.5/2) 2 x 3.1 4 = 43 3 squar e inches . Fo r th e exemptio n w e roundedup t o 50 0 squar e inche s t o exclud e an y mixer s tha t

wer e slightly ove r

23. 5 inches .
August 9,2010 

Office ofConsumer Infonnation and Insurance Oversight 

Department ofHealth and Human Services 

Attention: OCII0-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 


Baltimore, MD 21244--1850 


Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunitY to fonnally comment on 

the interim fInal rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document II) IRS-2010­

~OOI0-0001)..~ . - ­

I believe the consumer protections included as part ofthe new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number ofindividuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifIcally support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation ofthese 

regulations. 

Marc Haring 

1636 Lexington Ave. 

MansfIeld, OH 44907 

V .!..... . i ~·i;·.s: ;.. 0" • \.~ <If)".,I.., 

)
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 110 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 110

Providing that it shall not be in order in the House of Representatives 
 to consider certain funding measures for the United States Patent and 
                           Trademark Office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 3, 2001

   Mr. Berman (for himself and Mr. Boucher) submitted the following 
        resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing that it shall not be in order in the House of Representatives 
 to consider certain funding measures for the United States Patent and 
                           Trademark Office.

    Resolved, That it shall not be in order in the House of 
Representatives to consider any bill, joint resolution, amendment, 
motion, or conference report that makes available funds to the United 
States Patent and Trademark Office for any fiscal year, or for any 
other period for which the funds are provided, in amounts less than the 
total amount of patent and trademark fees collected by the United 
States Patent and Trademark Office in that fiscal year or during that 
other period (as the case may be).
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

WASHINGTON, DC

Pro

- Flight Aviation , Inc.

Complainant,

v. Docket No. 16

- 15

- 03

City of Renton

, Washington

Respondent.

/

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ATTORNEY ADDRESS

Please take notice that Benjamin H. Klein, counsel for Complainant, has moved to a new

address and firm. The undersigned’s new address and contact information is:

Gross & Klein LLP

Pier 9, Suite 100

San Francisco, CA 94111

Phone: (415) 671

- 4628

Fax: (646 ) 626

- 6452

bklein@grosskleinlaw.com

Dated March 8, 2016

Respectfully submitted,

/s/

__________________________ Benjamin H. Klein2 CERTI FICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that in accordance with 14 CFR §§ 16.15 and 16.13(h), I have this

da y , the 8 th of March 2016

, served the foregoing Notice of Change of Address on the

following persons by electronic mail :

Zanetta L. Fontes

Senior Assistant City Attorney

1055 South Gr ady Way

Renton, WA 98057

zfontes@rentonwa.gov

Attorneys for Respondent

Dated March 8 , 201 6

/s/

__________________________ Benjamin H. Klein
Prepared by R.R. Donnelley Financial -- Amendment to Loan Documents dated December 31, 2003



 Silicon Valley Bank 
  
 EXHIBIT 10.50 
  
 Amendment to Loan Documents 
  

			
	Borrower:	  	APPLIED IMAGING CORP.
	Address:	  	2380 Walsh Avenue
	 	  	Santa Clara, CA 95051
		
	Dated:	  	December 31, 2003

  
 THIS AMENDMENT TO
LOAN DOCUMENTS is entered into between Silicon Valley Bank (“Silicon”) and the borrower named above (“Borrower”). 
  
 Silicon and Borrower hereby agree to amend the Loan and Security Agreement between them, dated September 28, 2001 (as amended, restated, supplemented, or
otherwise modified from time to time, the “Loan Agreement”), as follows, effective as of the date hereof. (Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings set forth in the Loan Agreement.) 
  
 1. Modification re Tangible Net Worth. The following sentence is added to Section 5 of
the Schedule to Loan Agreement immediately before the section entitled “Definitions”: 
  
 “Notwithstanding the foregoing, the minimum Tangible Net Worth which Borrower shall be required to maintain at December 31, 2003 shall be
$2,200,000.” 
  
 2. Fee. In consideration for Silicon entering into
this Amendment, Borrower shall pay Silicon a fee of $1,000 concurrently with the execution and delivery of this Amendment, which fee shall be non-refundable and in addition to all interest and other fees payable to Silicon under the Loan Documents.
Silicon is authorized to charge said fee to Borrower’s loan account. 
  
 3.
Representations True. Borrower represents and warrants to Silicon that all representations and warranties set forth in the Loan Agreement, as amended hereby, are true and correct. 
  
 4. General Provisions. This Amendment, the Loan Agreement, any prior written amendments to the Loan Agreement signed by
Silicon and Borrower, and the other written documents and agreements between Silicon and Borrower set forth in full all of the representations and agreements of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersede all prior
discussions, representations, agreements and understandings between the parties with respect to the subject hereof. Except as herein expressly amended, all of the terms and provisions of the Loan Agreement, and all other documents and agreements
between Silicon 

  

 -1- 










			
	Silicon Valley Bank	  	Amendment to Loan Documents

  

 
and Borrower shall continue in full force and effect and the same are hereby ratified and confirmed. 
  
 [Signatures on following page] 
  

									
	Borrower:	 	 	 	Silicon:
	APPLIED IMAGING CORP.	 	 	 	SILICON VALLEY BANK
					
	By	 	/s/ Barry Hotchkies	 	 	 	By	 	/s/ Chitra Suriyanarayanan
	 	 	
	 	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	President or Vice President	 	 	 	Title	 	Account Manager

  

 -2-
----

**EXHIBIT        21.01**

| Name                  of Subsidiary             |   | State                  of Incorporation |   | I.D.                  Number |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|                                            |   |                                    |   |                         |
| Universal                  Supply Group, Inc.   |   | New                  York               |   | 11-3391045                   |
|                                            |   |                                    |   |                         |
| RAL                  Supply Group, Inc.         |   | New                  York               |   | 20-0207168                   |
|                                            |   |                                    |   |                         |
| American/Universal                  Supply Inc. |   | New                  York               |   | 16-1661494                   |

----
Feb. 19: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL in Syria and Iraq
 By CJTF - Operation Inherent Resolve News Release
  February 19, 2015 Release # 20150219FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **SOUTHWEST ASIA -**
 On Feb. 18, U.S. and Coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL
 terrorists in Syria, using attack, fighter, bomber and remotely piloted
 aircraft to conduct seven airstrikes. Separately, U.S. and Coalition 
military forces conducted eight airstrikes in Iraq, using attack and 
fighter aircraft against ISIL terrorists. All strikes took place between
 8 a.m., Feb. 18, and 8 a.m. Feb. 19, local time. The following is a summary of the strikes conducted since the last press release: **Syria***       Near Al Hasakah, two airstrikes struck multiple ISIL oil pump jacks and destroyed an ISIL checkpoint. *
       Near Kobani, five airstrikes struck two ISIL tactical units and 
destroyed eight ISIL fighting positions and two ISIL checkpoints. **Iraq***       Near Al Asad, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL mortar tube. *       Near Bayji, an airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed three ISIL fighting positions. *
       Near Hit in Al Anbar Province, two airstrikes struck an ISIL 
tactical unit, an ISIL weapons storage and staging area and destroyed an
 ISIL building. *       Near Kirkuk, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL armored vehicle. *       Near Mosul, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL vehicle. *
       Near Tal Afar, two airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit, an 
ISIL fighting position and destroyed three ISIL buildings. Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely. The
 strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the 
operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose
 to Iraq, Syria, the region, and the wider international community. The 
destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the 
terrorist group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. 
Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Iraq include the 
U.S., Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Netherlands, and the 
United Kingdom. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in 
Syria include the U.S., Bahrain, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the United 
Arab Emirates.
#### LUCINDA K. SPEAR AND HELENE SPEAR, PLAINTIFFS, v. ISAAC HUMMER AND RAYMOND T. HUMMER, DEFENDANTS.

Decided August 11, 1933.

*710Lyon, C. C. J.

This is on a rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted. Yerdict for the injured plaintiff was $10,000, and $200 for the owner of the car.

The case of the plaintiff is based largely on the theory that the. defendant was driving at an extraordinary rate of speed. Mrs. Spear testified that the defendant was going sixty-five or seventy miles an hour. If the jury should find that that was true then it is not clear that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. Mrs. Spear testified that she looked both ways when she entered upon this road and waited until she had a very good opening and then started across. She said when she got on the concrete road she noticed a car coming at a terrific speed down the center lane. If the jury should find that to be true and that the defendant’s car was coming at such a terrific speed then it was probably so far away when Mrs. Spear started to cross that she would not be obliged to anticipate danger from it. It was not necessary that her observation should extend beyond a distance within which the car moving at a lawful rate of speed would endanger her. *Rockford*v. Stankewicz, 108 *N. J. L.*265; 158 *Atl. Rep.*386.

The evidence is susceptible of that inference and, of course, is a question for the jury. I do not think the evidence of the contributory negligence of the plaintiff is great enough to Say that it is sustained by overwhelming weight and strong enough to warrant the granting of a new trial on that ground.

On the question of the amount of the verdict I do not think it is so great that it should be disturbed. The plaintiff was very seriously injured. This is shown by the length of time that she was confined to the hospital, the expenses amounting to about $2,700, and the fact that she is still suffering. I have carefully examined comparable cases and cannot find any where the Supreme Court has cut down a similar verdict.

The rule to show cause will be discharged.
#### § 800.5 Office locations.

The principal offices of the National Transportation Safety Board are located at 490 L'Enfant Plaza East, SW., Washington, DC 20594-003. The Board maintains field offices in selected cities throughout the United States.

[60 FR 61489, Nov. 30, 1995, as amended at 81 FR 75731, Nov. 1, 2016]
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 375

Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 20, 2002

Mr. GOSS submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed

to

RESOLUTION

Designating majority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following Member be, and is here2 by, elected to the following standing committee of the

3 House of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE: Mr.

5 Fletcher.

Æ
§ 806.1 General policy. ( a ) The interests of the United States and its citizens are best served by making information regarding the affairs of Government readily available to the public. This concept of an informed citizenry is reflected in the Freedom of Information Act and in the current public information policies of the executive branch.
( b ) Within the Federal Government there is some official information and material which, because it bears directly on the effectiveness of our national defense and the conduct of our foreign relations, must be subject to some constraints for the security of our Nation and the safety of our people and our allies. To protect against actions hostile to the United States, of both an overt and covert nature, it is essential that such official information and material be given only limited dissemination.
#### James Lennon, Respondent, *v.*The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

*Lennon*v. N. *Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co.,*137 App. Div. 927, affirmed.

(Argued June 6, 1911;

decided June 16, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 18,1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for alleged malicious prosecution.

*622
      *Alfred L. Becker*for appellant.

*Eugene M. Bartlett*and *E. W. McIntyre*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LANCE REBERGER,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

JAMES DZURENDA; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 19

- 15155

D.C. No. 3:17

- cv

- 00552

- RCJ

- WGC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Robert Clive Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 5, 2020 * *

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Nevada state prisoner Lance Reberger appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to pay the

filing fee after denying Reberger’s application to proceed in forma pauperis

(“IFP”). W e have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 12 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 15155

Andrew s v. Cervantes , 493 F.3d 1047, 1052 (9th Cir. 2007). We reverse and

remand.

The district court denied Reberger’s application to proceed IFP on the basis

that Reberger has three prior s trikes. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). However, Reberger

alleged in the complaint that he was under imminent danger of serious physical

harm because his prolonged isolation in administrative segregation is causing him

physical injuries , he is unable to access his HIV medication as prescribed, and his

water is contaminated with chemicals and is undrinkable

. These allegations are

sufficient to satisfy the “imminent danger” exception. See Andrews , 493 F.3d at

105 5 ( an exception to the three

- strikes rule exists w here “the complaint makes a

plausible allegation that the prisoner faced ‘ imminent danger of serious physical

injury’ at the time of filing

. ” ). We reverse the judgment and remand for further

proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.