alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000022709
<NAME> WESTFORD GROUP
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          26,794
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  320,452
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               552,267
<PP&E>                                         216,924
<DEPRECIATION>                                 152,880
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 791,060
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          266,150
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       871,286
<OTHER-SE>                                   (409,147)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   791,060
<SALES>                                      1,389,459
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,390,381
<CGS>                                          815,399
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,240,316
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,563
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                131,502
<INCOME-TAX>                                    31,579
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             99,923
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    99,923
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
----

(2004/C 88 E/0502)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0226/04

by Margrietus van den Berg (PSE) to the Commission

(2 February 2004)

Subject:   Starch factories and developing countries

On a working visit to Veendam, I was informed about the possibilities of starch being produced from cassava in developing countries and about the factors which are hampering progress in that area. In many developing countries, cassava is frequently a local crop which thrives in the natural environment and is very suitable for use in the production of starch. Starch is a raw material for the food, textiles and paper industries. Construction of a starch factory may create a large number of jobs in the rural parts of developing countries which frequently have to cope with high rates of unemployment. Many jobs can be created in agriculture, in industry and in small private businesses. It costs between EUR 4 and 5 million to construct a factory of this nature. That is an affordable investment which can give a real positive boost to local economies in developing countries. Private investors are interested in participating in the projects with venture capital, but that is not sufficient for the implementation of the projects. Banks, too, must participate by granting loans, but they are less cooperative. Participating banks want guarantees for the amounts that they lend. The provision by the European Union of bank guarantees in respect of such projects would be very valuable and would encourage the banks to participate. That would result in the green light being given for considerable small-scale investments with a huge economic spin-off in the local economy of developing countries.

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(12 March 2004)

----
§ 604.7 Qualified human service organizations. ( a ) A recipient may provide charter service to a qualified human service organization (QHSO) for the purpose of serving persons: ( 1 ) With mobility limitations related to advanced age;
( 2 ) With disabilities; or
( 3 ) With low income.
( b ) If an organization serving persons described in paragraph (a) of this section receives funding, directly or indirectly, from the programs listed in Appendix A of this part, the QHSO shall not be required to register on the FTA charter registration Web site.
( c ) If a QHSO serving persons described in paragraph (a) of this section does not receive funding from any of the programs listed in Appendix A of this part, the QHSO shall register on the FTA charter registration Web site in accordance with § 604.15.
( d ) A recipient providing charter service under this exception, whether or not the QHSO receives funding from Appendix A programs, and after providing such charter service, shall record: ( 1 ) The QHSO's name, address, phone number, and e-mail address;
( 2 ) The date and time of service;
( 3 ) The number of passengers;
( 4 ) The origin, destination, and trip length (miles and hours);
( 5 ) The fee collected, if any; and
( 6 ) The vehicle number for the vehicle used to provide the service.
From: Gayla Frazier [mailto:fayjane@kc.rr.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 10:46 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: EBSA Proposed Rules

Leave 401K and IRA rules as is. The proposed rules appear to be formulated to help the 

"ignorant" populace manage its savings. Those who are not investment savvy hire those 

who are experts to help manage their savings/401Ks/IRAs. The government needs to 

stay out of private income, that is the little that is left after taxes. Do not place the burden 

of risk on employers, they pass that risk on to consumers and, ultimately, right back to 

those the proposed rules claim to protect. 

 

Government needs to stay out of private savings. 

 

Gayla Frazier 

Shawnee, KS
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 416

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the International Criminal

Court.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 9, 2002

Mr. PAUL (for himself, Mr. BARR of Georgia, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland,

Mr. CANNON, Mr. COLLINS, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. GOODE, Mr.

MANZULLO, Mr. NORWOOD, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. SCHAFFER, Mr.

SESSIONS, and Mr. WELDON of Florida) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the

International Criminal Court.

Whereas on May 6, 2002, President George W. Bush renounced the signature of the United States from the

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, declaring that the United States has no legal obligations

arising from its signature on December 31, 2000, and

proclaiming that the United States has no intention of

becoming a party to the Rome Statute;

Whereas in taking action to withdraw the United States from

the jurisdictional reach of the International Criminal

Court, President Bush has given notice to the international community that the United States will defend
2

•HRES 416 IH

her sovereignty and her citizens from a court that undermines the checks and balances of the Constitution of the

United States and even departs from the system that the

drafters of the United Nations Charter envisioned; and

Whereas Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld has acknowledged the International Criminal Court will not respect

the decision of the United States to stay out of the treaty, because the provisions of the Rome Statute claim authority to detain and try American citizens, including

members of the armed services and other governmental

officials, even though the United States has not consented to the terms of the Rome Statute and even though

the law of nations provides that no nation may be bound

to a treaty except by that nation’s expressed consent:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of Congress that—

2 (1) President George W. Bush be commended

3 for taking this bold first step to protect American

4 servicemembers and citizens from the possibility of

5 unwarranted and politically-motivated prosecutions;

6 (2) President Bush be encouraged to remain

7 steadfast in his intention of protecting American

8 servicemembers and citizens from the unchecked

9 power of the International Criminal Court; and

10 (3) Congress should forthwith take all steps

11 necessary to grant appropriate authority to the

12 President to defend the American people from the
3

•HRES 416 IH

1 threat of arrest, prosecution, and conviction by the

2 International Criminal Court.

Æ
#### § 585.84 Definitions.

For the purposes of this subpart:

*Production year* means the 12-month period between September 1 of one year and August 31 of the following year, inclusive.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Fish and Wildlife Service

          - [FWS-R8-ES-2023-N072; FXES11130800000-234-FF08E00000]

# AGENCY:

Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of initiation of reviews; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         of August 17, 2023, initiating 5-year status reviews of 47 species in California, Nevada, and Oregon under the Endangered Species Act. We inadvertently included one species in error. We are correcting the notice to remove that species.                    

# DATES:

Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before October 16, 2023.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On August 17, 2023, we, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, published a notice initiating 5-year status reviews of 47 species in California, Nevada, and Oregon under the Endangered Species Act. We inadvertently included one species, the southern sea otter (                    *Enhydra lutris nereis*), in error. We are correcting the notice to remove that species. For how to comment, see our August 17, 2023, notice (88 FR 56042).                

## Correction

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of August 17, 2023, in FR Doc. 2023-17728, please make the following correction:                

On page 56043, remove the “Otter, southern sea” entry from the table.

Jill Russi,

Acting Regional Director, California Great Basin Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

[FR Doc. 2023-18479 Filed 8-25-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4333-15-P
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**The undersigned, David Mitchell, President and Chief Executive Officer of webMethods, Inc. (the“Company”), has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities andExchange Commission of the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months endedDecember 31, 2006 (the “Report”). The undersigned hereby certifies that: (1) the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.       Date: February 8, 2007 /s/ David Mitchell         Name: David Mitchell    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 611.303 Small Starts project justification criteria. ( a ) To perform the statutorily required evaluations and assign ratings for project justification, FTA will evaluate information developed locally through the planning, NEPA and project development processes. ( 1 ) The method used by FTA to evaluate and rate projects will be a multiple measure approach by which the merits of candidate projects will be evaluated in terms of each of the criteria specified by this section.
( 2 ) The measures for these criteria are specified in Appendix A and elaborated on in policy guidance. This policy guidance, which is subject to a public comment period, is issued periodically by FTA whenever significant changes are proposed, but not less frequently than every two years, as required by 49 U.S.C. 5309(g)(5).
( 3 ) The measures will be applied to projects defined by project sponsors that are proposed to FTA for Small Starts funding.
( 4 ) The ratings for each of the criteria in § 611.303(b)(1) through (6) will be expressed in terms of descriptive indicators, as follows: “high,” “medium-high,” “medium,” “medium-low,” or “low.”
( b ) The project justification criteria are as follows: ( 1 ) Cost-effectiveness, as measured by cost per rider.
( 2 ) Economic development effects.
( 3 ) Existing land use.
( 4 ) Mobility improvements.
( 5 ) Environmental benefits.
( 6 ) Congestion relief.
( c ) In evaluating proposed Small Starts projects under these criteria: ( 1 ) As a candidate project proceeds through project development, a greater level of commitment will be expected with respect to transit supportive land use plans and policies and the project sponsor's technical capacity to implement the project.
( 2 ) For any criteria under paragraph (b) of this section that use incremental measures, the point for comparison will be the no-build alternative.
( d ) FTA may amend the measures for these project justification criteria. Any such amendment will be included in policy guidance and subject to a public comment process.
( e ) From time to time FTA may publish through policy guidance standards based on characteristics of projects and/or corridors to be served. If a proposed project can meet the established standards, FTA may assign an automatic rating on one or more of the project justification criteria outlined in this section.
( f ) The individual ratings for each of the criteria described in this section will be combined into a summary project justification rating of “high,” “medium-high,” “medium,” “medium-low,” or “low” through a process that gives comparable, but not necessarily equal, weight to each criterion. The process by which the project justification rating will be developed, including the assigned weights, will be described in policy guidance.
**Exhibit 21.1**

** **

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

The following table sets forth all subsidiaries of theregistrant, the state or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization ofeach, and the names under which such subsidiaries do business as of September 30,2006.  The financial statements of all subsidiaries are included in theconsolidated statements of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiary.

1.       The Palmetto Bank, a South Carolinacorporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc.

2.       Palmetto Capital Inc., a SouthCarolina corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of The Palmetto Bank
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.1


                           PAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of PAR Technology  Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended  September 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  we,
John W. Sammon and Ronald J. Casciano,  Chairman of the Board & Chief  Executive
Officer  and Vice  President,  Chief  Financial  Officer,  Treasurer,  and Chief
Accounting  Officer of the Company,  certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of our knowledge:


     (1)  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirement  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.






John W. Sammon
------------------------------
John W. Sammon
Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive Officer
November 9, 2009


Ronald J. Casciano
------------------------------
Ronald J. Casciano
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer,
and Chief Accounting Officer
November 9, 2009















                                       E-3
Exhibit 31.2  Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer    I, Frank Dalene, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Hamptons Luxury Homes, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.   Date:   August 3, 2006    /s/ Frank Dalene Frank Dalene Chief Financial Officer
CENTCOM’s top logistics officer tours watercraft set, touts strategic advantage
 By Justin Graff
  Maj. Gen. Edward Dorman, J-4 (logistics), U.S. Army Central Command, looks out over the pier aboard the Large Tug U.S. Army Vessel Col. Seth Warner during his visit to the 401st Army Field Support Battalion-Kuwait’s Army Prepositioned Stocks-5 watercraft set at Kuwait Naval Base, Aug. 3. (Photo by Justin Graff, 401st AFSB Public Affairs)




Maj. Gen. Edward Dorman, J-4 (logistics), U.S. Army Central Command, looks out over the pier aboard the Large Tug U.S. Army Vessel Col. Seth Warner during his visit to the 401st Army Field Support Battalion-Kuwait’s Army Prepositioned Stocks-5 watercraft set at Kuwait Naval Base, Aug. 3. (Photo by Justin Graff, 401st AFSB Public Affairs)
        Maj. Gen. Edward Dorman on the U.S. Army Vessel Col. Seth Warner
            Maj. Gen. Edward Dorman, J-4 (logistics), U.S. Army Central Command, looks out over the pier aboard the Large Tug U.S. Army Vessel Col. Seth Warner during his visit to the 401st Army Field Support Battalion-Kuwait’s Army Prepositioned Stocks-5 watercraft set at Kuwait Naval Base, Aug. 3. (Photo by Justin Graff, 401st AFSB Public Affairs)

            SHARE IMAGE:

                Download Image
                    Image Details
                    
                    Photo By: Justin Graff
                    
                    VIRIN: 160803-A-HA643-0001
# USCENTCOM and Tajikistan discuss security cooperation

/ Published April 27, 2018
Tampa, Fla., 
Representatives of Tajikistan's Ministry of Defense visited USCENTCOM headquarters to finalize a security cooperation program for fiscal year 2019, April 18-19. 

The event is the final step of a two-part process that consists of an action officer working group and consultative staff talks that intend to further cooperation in the following areas:

•Border security.

•English language training. 

•Medical cooperation

•Continued development of Professional Military Education (PME) system.

•Defense professionalization. 

•Regional coordination. 

•Multi-national exercises.

The talks also serve to review the progress of the current year’s joint security cooperation program of activities.

Gen. Maj. Hushvakht Mirovarov, First Deputy Chief of the General Staff of Armed Forces of the Republic of Tajikistan, led the Tajikistan delegation. U.S. Air Force Brig. Gen. Bradley Swanson, deputy director of U.S. Central command's Strategy, Plans, and Policy directorate headed the event.

"This year’s talks represent another successful step forward in deepening and broadening U.S. – Tajikistan security cooperation to advance mutual security and defense interests,” said U.S. Army Maj. Lemar Farhad, U.S. Central Command’s Tajikistan country director.
§ 501.5 Exercise of authority. ( a ) All authorities lawfully vested in and reserved to the Administrator in this title, part, or other NHTSA regulation or directive may be exercised by the Deputy Administrator and, in the absence or disability of both officials, by the Chief Counsel, unless specifically prohibited by statute, regulation, or order.
( b ) In exercising the powers and performing the duties delegated by this part, officers of NHTSA and their delegates are governed by applicable laws, executive orders, regulations, and other directives, and by policies, objectives, plans, standards, procedures, and limitations as may be issued from time to time by or on behalf of the Secretary of Transportation, the Administrator, the Deputy Administrator, the Chief Counsel, and the Executive Director or, with respect to matters under their jurisdiction, by or on behalf of the Associate Administrators, the Regional Administrators, and the Directors of Staff Offices.
( c ) Each officer to whom authority is delegated by this part may redelegate and authorize successive redelegations of that authority subject to any conditions the officer prescribes.
( d ) Each officer to whom authority is delegated will administer and perform the functions described in the officer's respective functional statements.