alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.2

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT

The Board of Directors

CT Communications, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements (Registration Nos. 33-59641, 33-59643,
33-59645, 333-15537, 333-30125, 333-38895, 333-77323, 333-65818,
and 333-65846) of CT Communications, Inc. of our report dated
February 19, 2004, relating to the audited consolidated
balance sheets of Palmetto MobileNet, L.P. as of
December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related consolidated
statements of income and partners equity, and cash flows
for each of the three years ended December 31, 2003, 2002,
and 2001, which report is included in the December 31, 2003
Annual Report on Form 10-K of CT Communications, Inc.



| |                                      
| | -------------------------------------
| | /s/ Bauknight Pietras & Stormer, P.A.

Columbia, South Carolina

March 11, 2004
#### § 511.74 Attorneys.

An attorney at law who is admitted to practice before the Federal courts or before the highest court of any State, the District of Columbia, or any territory or Commonwealth of the United States, may practice before the NHTSA. An attorney's own representation that he or she is in good standing before any of such courts shall be sufficient proof thereof, unless otherwise ordered by the Presiding Officer or the Administrator.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of webMethods, Inc
(the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, David Mitchell, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that: (1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date: February 14, 2005
    
    /S/ DAVID MITCHELLName: David Mitchell
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
---------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------

2 0 LUW 


Page 1 of2

~£C--) Jr4/1--/0 

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 

PUBLICATION&, REGULATIONS 

BRANCH As of: August 20, 2010 

Received: August 09, 2010 PUBLIC 
 Status: Posted

Posted: August 20, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2c632 SUBMISSION 
 Comments Due: August 16, ;WlO 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0182 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: Robert Dean Barnes 

Address: 

140 Redwing Dr. 

Winchester, KY, 40391 

Email: rdbarnesdc@earthlink.net 

Submitter's Representative: McConnell 

Organization: ACA 

Government Agency Type: Federal 

Government Agency: AHRQ 

General Comment 

8-8-2010 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCIlO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status 

as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document lD IRS-2010­

0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

https:llfdms.erulemaking.net!fdms-web-agency/ component! submitterlnfoCoverPage ?Call=... 8/20/2010 
Page 2 of2 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans shoulcl not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these 

regulations. 

Robert Barnes 

https:/ Ifdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency Icomponentlsubmitter InfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/2012010
# Az Európai Unió C 154/2004

| | ISSN 1725-518X |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | C 154 |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Tájékoztatások és közlemények | 47. évfolyam2004. június 11. |

ISSN 1725-518X

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

C 154

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Tájékoztatások és közlemények

47. évfolyam2004. június 11.

---

| Közleményszám | Tartalom | Oldal |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Információ |
| | Bizottság |
| 2004/C 154/1 | Euro átváltási árfolyamok | 1 |

Közleményszám

Tartalom

Oldal

I   Információ

Bizottság

2004/C 154/1

Euro átváltási árfolyamok

1

| HU | |
| --- | --- |

HU

---

I Információ

Bizottság

| 11.6.2004 | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | C 154/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2004

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

C 154/1

---

Euro átváltási árfolyamok (1)

2004. június 10.

(2004/C 154/01)

1 euro=

| | Pénznem | Átváltási árfolyam |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | USA dollár | 1,2052 |
| JPY | Japán yen | 131,84 |
| DKK | Dán korona | 7,4384 |
| GBP | Angol font | 0,6614 |
| SEK | Svéd korona | 9,1475 |
| CHF | Svájci frank | 1,5126 |
| ISK | Izlandi korona | 87,12 |
| NOK | Norvég korona | 8,28 |
| BGN | Bulgár leva | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Ciprusi font | 0,5828 |
| CZK | Cseh korona | 31,33 |
| EEK | Észt korona | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Magyar Forint | 253,10 |
| LTL | Litván litász/lita | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Lett lats | 0,6536 |
| MTL | Máltai líra | 0,4249 |
| PLN | Lengyel zloty | 4,5877 |
| ROL | Román lej | 40 865 |
| SIT | Szlovén tolar | 239,14 |
| SKK | Szlovák korona | 39,87 |
| TRL | Török líra | 1 806 800 |
| AUD | Ausztrál dollár | 1,7374 |
| CAD | Kanadai dollár | 1,6381 |
| HKD | Hong Kong-i dollár | 9,3975 |
| NZD | Új-zélandi dollár | 1,9120 |
| SGD | Szingapúri dollár | 2,0637 |
| KRW | Dél-Koreai won | 1 396,96 |
| ZAR | Dél-Afrikai rand | 8,0189 |

Pénznem

Átváltási árfolyam

USD

USA dollár

1,2052

JPY

Japán yen

131,84

DKK

Dán korona

7,4384

GBP

Angol font

0,6614

SEK

Svéd korona

9,1475

CHF

Svájci frank

1,5126

ISK

Izlandi korona

87,12

NOK

Norvég korona

8,28

BGN

Bulgár leva

1,9558

CYP

Ciprusi font

0,5828

CZK

Cseh korona

31,33

EEK

Észt korona

15,6466

HUF

Magyar Forint

253,10

LTL

Litván litász/lita

3,4528

LVL

Lett lats

0,6536

MTL

Máltai líra

0,4249

PLN

Lengyel zloty

4,5877

ROL

Román lej

40 865

SIT

Szlovén tolar

239,14

SKK

Szlovák korona

39,87

TRL

Török líra

1 806 800

AUD

Ausztrál dollár

1,7374

CAD

Kanadai dollár

1,6381

HKD

Hong Kong-i dollár

9,3975

NZD

Új-zélandi dollár

1,9120

SGD

Szingapúri dollár

2,0637

KRW

Dél-Koreai won

1 396,96

ZAR

Dél-Afrikai rand

8,0189

---

(1)

Forrás: Az Európai Központi Bank (ECB) átváltási árfolyama.

---
From: Knepler, Gary [mailto:Gary.Knepler@fiserv.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 11:21 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: private retirement plans 

Leave my private retirement plans alone! The American people to not need the 

government controlling a person’s retirement accounts. It is my money. I worked for it. 

Leave it alone! 

You want to reduce the Federal Deficit, cut government spending, eliminate 

Congressional pensions and make all government employees (this means all elected and 

appointed government officials) pay into social security. If the government has a deficit 

for the current year, then no one in Congress gets any type of salary increase the next 

year. If a business is losing money, they freeze salaries, eliminate bonuses, reduce 

expenses and cut staff. Why should the US government should any different?
From: Donald Grimes [mailto:dongrimes126@mac.com] 

Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 9:01 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

The Proposed Annuitization Of 401(k) 

Request For Information 

 Here is my understanding of the basic concept: the federal government will take the 

money out of my 401(k) in exchange for a promised stream of income for the rest of my 

life after I retire. 

How is this different from Social Security? 

How is this any different than the promise the federal government made when social 

security began under President Franklin Roosevelt? 

There would not be this discussion today if the original promise of social security had not 

changed over the years. 

Politicians could not keep their hands off the social security fund over the years and now 

the fund is empty – full of I.O.U.s. Today it is a Ponzi scheme requiring current 

contributors to pay for current retirees. 

The same changes will be made by politicians, to this “promise”, as the years roll along. 

Therefore I reject any plan that allows the federal government to take my 401(k) money. 

If the federal government wants to help future Americans enjoy retirement – see that 

Americans are taught how to do their own planning for retirement. This teaching should 

be started in high school. 

In general the federal government has demonstrated to me that “they” are no good at 

social management which supports American’s freedom and liberty. 

Therefore, if I hear that the federal government is really “thinking” about taking my 

401(k) and IRA money and replacing my money with a promise (annuitize it), I will cash 

out my 401(k) and IRA, pay the taxes, and invest my money elsewhere. 

Donald Grimes 

Professional Engineer 

Findlay, Ohio
Exhibit 31.2

I, John T. Ottinger, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Cornerstone Ministries Investments, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and

6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: August 11, 2006

s/John. T. Ottinger

John T. Ottinger, Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer



13
-----Original Message----- 

From: Kim Fromme [mailto:frommekn@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 5:12 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 

Keep your government grubbing hands off of my retirement and savings. 

Haven't you, the government, spent enough and now you want to add our 

other hard earned money to your slush fund. 

Stay away from my savings and pension. You do not have the 

constitutional right to meddle in my financial affairs. 

 

Kim Fromme
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0594.html[7/21/2015 6:36:37 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-wfpn

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0594

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Perilyn Barton

Address:

4760 Atwood Blvd

Murray, UT, 84107-3979

Email: perijbarton22@yahoo.com

Phone: 801-266-9751

General Comment

I do not want the Department of Labor any part of the government controlling or telling me how I can use my

 money in my retirement.
§ 807.110 Self-evaluation. ( a ) The agency shall, by April 9, 1987, evaluate its current policies and practices, and the effects thereof, that do not or may not meet the requirements of this part, and to the extent modification of any such policies and practices is required, the agency shall proceed to make the necessary modifications.
( b ) The agency shall provide an opportunity to interested persons, including handicapped persons or organizations representing handicapped persons, to participate in the self-evaluation process by submitting comments (both oral and written).
( c ) The agency shall, until three years following the completion of the self-evaluation, maintain on file and make available for public inspections: ( 1 ) A description of areas examined and any problems identified, and
( 2 ) A description of any modifications made.
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0330[1].txt

-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/15/2010 09:28PM -----

To: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

From: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US 

Date: 02/04/2010 11:01PM 

cc: wayland.robertj@epa.gov, horowitz.michael@epa.gov 

Subject: draft MACT floor memo

Cortney,

Attached is the draft MACT floor memo. You will see a few changes from the draft rule 

package. Based on the comments that EPA had not included variability in the MACT floor 

analysis, we took another look at the data. We removed tests for two engines because they 

were tested using a different test method than what is required in the rule, and we had 

concerns about using that data. We are also looking at individual runs for the MACT floor 

engines, rather than the average of the test runs, when determining what the MACT floor 

should be.

Melanie King 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Mail Code D243-01 

RTP, NC 27711 

Phone: (919) 541-2469 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

king.melanie@epa.gov

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0330[1].txt2/22/2010 11:59:07 AM
§ 372.211 Pittsburgh, PA. The zone adjacent to, and commercially a part of Pittsburgh within which transportation by motor vehicle in interstate or foreign commerce, not under common control, management, or arrangement for a continuous carriage or shipment to or from a point beyond such zone, is partially exempt from regulation under 49 U.S.C. 13506(b)(1) includes and is comprised of all points as follows: ( a ) The municipality of Pittsburgh, Pa., itself;
( b ) All points within a line drawn 15 miles beyond the municipal limits of Pittsburgh;
( c ) Those points in Allegheny County, Pa., which are not within the area described in paragraph (b) of this section;
( d ) All of any municipality any part of which is within the limits of the combined areas defined in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, and
( e ) All of any municipality wholly surrounded, or so surrounded except for a water boundary, by the municipality of Pittsburgh or by any other municipality included under the terms of paragraph (d) of this section.
[41 FR 56654, Dec. 29, 1976, as amended at 62 FR 15422, Apr. 1, 1997; 78 FR 58478, Sept. 24, 2013]
ISAF commander's statement regarding president's announcement
 By None  , ISAF Public Information Office
  KABUL, Afghanistan (Dec. 2, 2009) — The statement of General Stanley McChrystal, commander, NATO International Security Assistance Force and U.S. Forces Afghanistan regarding the address by the president of the United States:"The Afghanistan-Pakistan review led by the President has provided me with a clear military mission and the resources to accomplish our task. The clarity, commitment and resolve outlined in the President's address are critical steps toward bringing security to Afghanistan and eliminating terrorist safe havens that threaten regional and globalsecurity."The NATO International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) objective is equally clear: We will work toward improved security for Afghanistan and the transfer of responsibility to Afghan security forces as rapidly as conditions allow. In the meantime, our Afghan partners need the support of Coalition forces while we grow and develop the capacity of the Afghan army and police. That will be the main focus of our campaign in the months ahead."The 42 other nations of the Coalition will benefit from a strengthened U.S. commitment, as success in Afghanistan must be an international, integrated civil-military effort - from our security and training capacity to the governance and economic development assistance that sustains long-term stability. The concerted commitment of the international community will prevail in bringing real change to Afghanistan — a secure and stable environment that allows for effective governance, improved economic opportunity and the freedom of every Afghan to choose how they live."We face many challenges in Afghanistan, but our efforts are sustained by one unassailable reality: neither the Afghan people nor the international community want Afghanistan to remain a sanctuary for terror and violence. The coalition is encouraged by President Obama's commitment and we remain resolute to empowering the Afghan people to reject the insurgency and build their own future."
#### David W. Burt, Respondent, v. George W. *639Goodrich, Appellant, Impleaded, etc.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent against the appellant. Opinion by

Barker, J.;

Haight, J., not sitting.
-----Original Message-----

From: Charla Hatton [mailto:charlahatton@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2015 2:03 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule -- RIN 1210-AB32

I would like to add my voice to those urging you to stick to your guns on extending fiduciary duty to 

anyone who advises people on their retirement accounts. The arguments against it range from 

ridiculous to specious, and the argument for your actions is that consumers deserve to have such a 

critical set of choices they are asked to make shielded as much as possible from self-serving abuse. 

Charla Hatton

123 NW 12th Ave.

Portland, OR 97209

charlahatton@yahoo.com
§ 604.37 Appearances, parties, and rights of parties. ( a ) Any party to the hearing may appear and be heard in person and any party to the hearing may be accompanied, represented, or advised by an attorney licensed by a State, the District of Columbia, or a territory of the United States to practice law or appear before the courts of that State or territory, or by another duly authorized representative. An attorney, or other duly authorized representative, who represents a party shall file according to the filing and service procedures contained in § 604.30 and § 604.31.
( b ) The parties to the hearing are the respondent(s) named in the hearing order, the complainant(s), and FTA, as represented by the PO.
( c ) The parties to the hearing may agree to extend for a reasonable period of time the time for filing a document under this part. If the parties agree, the PO shall grant one extension of time to each party. The party seeking the extension of time shall submit a draft order to the PO to be signed by the PO and filed with the hearing docket. The PO may grant additional oral requests for an extension of time where the parties agree to the extension.
( d ) An extension of time granted by the PO for any reason extends the due date for the PO's recommended decision and for the final agency decision by the length of time in the PO's extension.
§ 563.9 Data capture. The EDR must capture and record the data elements for events in accordance with the following conditions and circumstances: ( a ) In a frontal air bag deployment crash, capture and record the current deployment data. In a side or side curtain/tube air bag deployment crash, where lateral delta-V is recorded by the EDR, capture and record the current deployment data. The memory for the air bag deployment event must be locked to prevent any future overwriting of the data.
( b ) In an event that does not meet the criteria in § 563.9(a), capture and record the current event data, up to two events, subject to the following conditions: ( 1 ) If an EDR non-volatile memory buffer void of previous-event data is available, the current event data is recorded in the buffer.
( 2 ) If an EDR non-volatile memory buffer void of previous-event data is not available, the manufacturer may choose to either overwrite any previous event data that does not deploy an air bag with the current event data, or to not record the current event data.
( 3 ) EDR buffers containing previous frontal, side, or side curtain/tube air bag deployment-event data must not be overwritten by the current event data.
[76 FR 47489, Aug. 5, 2011]