alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Jim Stuber [mailto:stuber_jw@comcast.net] 

Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 11:24 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: 2010 Investment Advice Proposed Rule

I would like to lend my voice in favor of the proposed regulations for protecting 401k investors 

from advisors that give advice to participants. I support the proposal that, if an adviser 

recommends a fund to plan participants and the adviser’s compensation is affected directly or 

indirectly by that recommendation, it is considered a prohibited transaction. 

 

I expect the mutual fund companies that extract fees from 401k participants will object strenuously to this 

regulation. Please do what's best for the working people and leave the proposed regulations substantially 

as currently written.

 

 

 

James W. Stuber

101 Lawncroft Avenue

Pittsburgh, PA 15228
§ 625.15 Elements of the National Transit Asset Management System. The National TAM System includes the following elements: ( a ) The definition of *state of good repair,* which includes objective standards for measuring the condition of capital assets, in accordance with subpart D of this part;
( b ) Performance measures for capital assets and a requirement that a provider and a group TAM plan sponsor establish performance targets for improving the condition of capital assets, in accordance with subpart D of this part;
( c ) A requirement that a provider develop and carry out a TAM plan, in accordance with subpart C of this part,
( d ) Reporting requirements in accordance with subpart E of this part; and
( e ) Analytical processes and decision support tools developed or recommended by FTA.
LIFETIME INCOME JOINT HEARING

HEARING ON CERTAIN ISSUES RELATING TO LIFETIME INCOME OPTIONS FOR 

PARTICIPANTS AND BENEFICIARIES IN RETIREMENT PLANS 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2010 

PRELIMINARY OUTLINE OF PRINCIPAL POINTS 

TO BE MADE BY 

JOHN M. VINE 

OF 

COVINGTON & BURLING 

INFORMATION TO HELP PARTICIPANTS MAKE CHOICES REGARDING 

MANAGEMENT AND SPEND DOWN OF RETIREMENT BENEFITS 

 1. Employer interest in raising participants’ awareness (2 minutes) 

 2. Employer concerns about fiduciary liability (2 minutes) 

 3. Specific information (5 minutes) 

 a. Characteristics of fixed income annuities and fixed deferred annuities. 

 b. Potential advantages and disadvantages of fixed annuities 

 c. Research reports 

 d. Sources of information regarding fixed annuities 

 e. Issuers and marketers of fixed annuities 

 4. Benefits to retirees (1 minute) 

 a. Uncharted territory for many retirees 

 b. Extremely important information 

 b. Trusted and unbiased source of information
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
A. L. PHARMA INC. SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PLAN
(Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2005)





The A. L. Pharma Inc. Supplemental Pension Plan (the "Plan") is hereby amended effective as of March 31, 2006, as follows:



1.    Section 2.2 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following to the end thereof:

"A participant who becomes employed by an unrelated employer upon the sale of (i) all or substantially all the assets used by the Company in the employing trade or business, or (ii) the Company's interest in the employing subsidiary, shall be deemed to have separated from service on the date immediately preceding the date that such participant becomes an employee of the purchaser, unless the purchaser agrees in connection with the sale to be substituted for the Company as the sponsor of Plan.  Such participant shall be entitled to a distribution in accordance with the terms of Section 2.4."

- END -
From: Jeremy Beadles [mailto:jbeadles@sletteninc.com] 

Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 6:54 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Sletten Inc. sponsors an employee stock ownership plan, or ESOP. Our ESOP makes 

employees of Sletten Inc. beneficial owners of our stock. 

Federal law requires that every year, as a privately-held company, not traded on a public stock 

exchange, that Sletten Inc. pays to have a qualified, independent valuation establish the value of 

the employees’ shares in the ESOP. 

Recently we learned that on October 22, 2010, the Department of Labor issued a proposed 

regulation to reverse a 34 year old policy, honored by both Republican and Democratic 

Administration 

prior to October 22, that would automatically make any valuator of ESOP shares a fiduciary to 

our ESOP. 

(Current law clearly makes the trustee a fiduciary, and company personnel with powers over the 

ESOP 

fiduciaries.) 

If the valuation provider is a fiduciary, she/he will have to purchase fiduciary insurance, many 

will withdraw providing valuation services to an ESOP company like Sletten Inc., and be subject 

to aggressive, needless lawsuits. 

But we do not write to protect the valuation profession; we write to protect our ESOP, and our 

employee owners. 

If the DOL proposal becomes effective, the cost of having an ESOP will increase, diminishing 

our profit, which means lower share value, and thus less retirement savings for employees. 

The biggest concern is the way the proposal is written, and its impact makes all private ESOP 

companies, both our trustees and company fiduciaries sitting ducks for lawsuits. 

Candidly, the proposal will cause a reassessment of whether successful ESOP programs should 

continue. 

The DOL proposal is contra to the law, which says Federal agencies are not to hinder the creation 

and operation of ESOPs. 

Jeremy Beadles 

Sletten Construction Co.

P: 406-761-7920

F: 406-761-0923
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                                BROOKSTONE, INC.

                            Subsidiary of Registrant
                            ------------------------

                                 April 19, 2002

Name                                                 Organized under laws of
----                                                 -----------------------

Brookstone, Company, Inc.                            New Hampshire

Brookstone Stores, Inc.                              New Hampshire

Brookstone Purchasing, Inc.                          New Hampshire

Brookstone Properties, Inc.                          New Hampshire

Brookstone By Mail, Inc.                             New Hampshire

Brookstone Holdings, Inc.                            New Hampshire

Fork Distribution Corporation                        New Hampshire

Gardeners Eden By Mail, Inc.                         New Hampshire

Brookstone Retail Puerto Rico, Inc.                  Puerto Rico

Brookstone O'Hare, LLC                               Delaware

Gardeners Eden Company, Inc.                         New Hampshire

Gardeners Eden Purchasing, Inc.                      New Hampshire
National Concessions Management

Brookstone Stores Georgia, LLC                       Delaware
#### § 8.19 [Reserved]
# ARCENT K-9 Conducts EOD Training

/ Published March 10, 2021
CAMP BUEHRING, KUWAIT, 
They trained in roadway, compound, and building searches to work on their identification and detection, skills essential for proficiency in the field. While the military working dogs were searching for ordnance on the ground, the handlers had to keep their eyes peeled on the surrounding area. “This is a way for us to integrate what we need to look for as handlers,” U.S. Navy Master-at-Arms 2nd Class Petty Officer Michael Vanbergriff, a kennel supervisor with ASG-KU DES K-9, said. “When your dog is working a roadway, you don’t need to be paying attention to the dog. What the handler needs to be doing is searching the surroundings for other areas of interest.”Service members had to investigate the areas for signs of possible improvised explosive devices (IED) set up by the explosive ordnance disposal specialists, who worked to make the experience as realistic as possible. Spc. Meghan Murray, military working dog handler with ASG-KU DES K-9, spoke on the benefits of the training, especially being able to work with EOD Soldiers.“It helps us understand what we could possibly see if we’re out on patrol,” she said. “It’s good to work with other [military occupations] so you can see a different picture and point of view. Now I have a [better] idea of what I need to look for as a handler.”The training is vital for K-9 units as they are constantly tasked for dangerous assignments such as patrols, drug searches, and IED detection. Murray said that constant training is vital as both the handler and the canine need to rely on each other to complete their roles as an effective team.Despite the dangers that being a military working dog handler entails, Vanbergriff feels there is no military occupation he would rather be in.“Best job in the military all together,” he said. “Very challenging, always changing; keeps you on your toes all the time and at the end of the day, your partner is a dog.”
# Sept. 24: Coalition continues strikes on Daesh VBIED network in Mosul

/ Published Sept. 24, 2015

September 24, 2015Release # 20150924-2FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**SOUTHWEST ASIA –** Coalition airstrikes continued destruction of key portions of the Daesh vehicle-borne IED network near Mosul, Iraq September 23, 2015, in coordination with the Government of Iraq.These airstrikes eliminated two significant VBIED production facilities that contributed to the VBIED network fueling ISIL's terrorist activities in the region."We will continue to systematically target and attack the Daesh VBIED network to increase security for the Iraqi Security Forces and the Iraqi population," said Col. Christopher Garver, CJTF-OIR Public Affairs Officer.This airstrike is part of a broader effort by the Coalition to degrade and ultimately defeat Daesh terrorists in Iraq and Syria. Video footage of this airstrike can be found here: https://youtu.be/RfDTKaIeD4I
Exhibit 35.3





COMPLIANCE STATEMENT


OF


THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY, AS SERVICER


The undersigned hereby certifies that he is the duly elected and acting Vice President and Treasurer of The Toledo Edison Company, as servicer (the “ Servicer ”) under the Phase-In-Recovery Property Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 20, 2013 (the “ Servicing Agreement ”), between the Servicer and TE Funding LLC, as Bond Issuer, and further certifies on behalf of the Servicer that:


|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement during the period that commenced January 1, 2017 and ended December 31, 2017 has been made under the supervision of the undersigned pursuant to Section 3.03 of the Servicing Agreement; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material respects under the Servicing Agreement throughout the period that commenced January 1, 2017 and ended December 31, 2017.

Executed as of this 30th day of March 2018.





THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANYBy:/s/ Steven R. StaubName:Steven R. StaubTitle:Vice President and Treasurer
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe pulse-pair algorithm as a robust estimator of turbulent weather spectral parameters using airborne pulse Doppler radarThe pulse pair method for spectrum parameter estimation is commonly used in pulse Doppler weather radar signal processing since it is economical to implement and can be shown to be a maximum likelihood estimator. With the use of airborne weather radar for windshear detection, the turbulent weather and strong ground clutter return spectrum differs from that assumed in its derivation, so the performance robustness of the pulse pair technique must be understood. Here, the effect of radar system pulse to pulse phase jitter and signal spectrum skew on the pulse pair algorithm performance is discussed. Phase jitter effect may be significant when the weather return signal to clutter ratio is very low and clutter rejection filtering is attempted. The analysis can be used to develop design specifications for airborne radar system phase stability. It is also shown that the weather return spectrum skew can cause a significant bias in the pulse pair mean windspeed estimates, and that the poly pulse pair algorithm can reduce this bias. It is suggested that use of a spectrum mode estimator may be more appropriate in characterizing the windspeed within a radar range resolution cell for detection of hazardous windspeed gradients.Document ID19910018088Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBaxa, Ernest G., Jr.*(Clemson Univ. SC, United States)*Lee, Jonggil*(Clemson Univ. SC, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1991Subject CategoryCommunications And RadarReport/Patent NumberTR-022891-3570PDOT/FAA/RD-91/17NAS 1.26:4382NASA-CR-4382Accession Number91N27402Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-928PROJECT: RTOP 505-64-12-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910018088.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
From: Marian Boussios [mailto:boussiosme@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2015 6:53 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Bad Reg, leave well enough alone!!!
POWER OF ATTORNEY
 FOR EXECUTION OF ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR
FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009
     /s/ Laurie J. Breininger
    
    /s/ John F. MeierLaurie J. Breininger
    
    John F. Meier/s/ Steven M. Chapman
    
    /s/ John H. ShueySteven M. Chapman
    
    John H. Shuey/s/ Thomas P. Capo
    
    /s/ Richard L. WamboldThomas P. Capo
    
    Richard L. Wambold/s/ John J. Holland
    
    /s/ Robert D. WeldingJohn J. Holland
    
    Robert D. Welding
 - 1 -
§ 375.217 How must I collect charges upon delivery? ( a ) You must specify the form of payment when you prepare the estimate. You and your agents must honor the form of payment at delivery, except when a shipper agrees to a change in writing.
( b ) You must specify the same form of payment provided in paragraph (a) of this section when you prepare the bill of lading.
( c ) Charge or credit card payments: ( 1 ) If you agree to accept payment by charge or credit card, you must arrange with the individual shipper for the delivery only at a time when you can obtain authorization for the shipper's credit card transaction.
( 2 ) Paragraph (c)(1) of this section does not apply to you when you have equipped your motor vehicle(s) to process card transactions.
( d ) You may maintain a tariff setting forth nondiscriminatory rules governing collect-on-delivery service and the collection of collect-on-delivery funds.
( e ) If an individual shipper pays you at least 110 percent of the approximate costs of a non-binding estimate on a collect-on-delivery shipment, you must relinquish possession of the shipment at the time of delivery.
[68 FR 35091, June 11, 2003, as amended at 69 FR 10575, Mar. 5, 2004; 87 FR 24447, Apr. 26, 2022]
Opinion filed April 11, 2013

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-12-00170-CR

_________

DWIGHT ELCHINSON A/K/A DWIGHT HOWARD ETCHISON A/K/A 

DWIGHT ELCHINISON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 238th District Court 

Midland County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR39015

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The jury convicted Dwight Elchinson a/k/a Dwight Howard Etchison a/k/a Dwight 

Elchinison of felony driving while intoxicated. The trial court sentenced him to confinement in 

the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for a term of eight years. 

We dismiss the appeal.

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw in this appeal. The 

motion is supported by a brief in which counsel professionally and conscientiously examines the 

record and applicable law and states that he has concluded that the appeal is frivolous. Counsel 
2

has provided Appellant with a copy of the brief and advised Appellant of his right to review the 

record and file a response to counsel’s brief. A response has not been filed.1 Court-appointed 

counsel has complied with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); In re 

Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1991); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 

S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969); 

and Eaden v. State, 161 S.W.3d 173 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2005, no pet.). Following the 

procedures outlined in Anders and Schulman, we have independently reviewed the record, and 

we agree that the appeal is without merit and should be dismissed. Schulman, 252 S.W.3d at 

409.

We note that counsel has the responsibility to advise Appellant that he may file a petition 

for discretionary review with the clerk of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals seeking review 

by that court. TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4 (“In criminal cases, the attorney representing the defendant on 

appeal shall, within five days after the opinion is handed down, send his client a copy of the 

opinion and judgment, along with notification of the defendant’s right to file a pro se petition for 

discretionary review under Rule 68.”). Likewise, this court advises Appellant that he may file a 

petition for discretionary review pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 68.

The motion to withdraw is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. 

PER CURIAM

April 11, 2013

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson, J.

 1

By letter, this court granted Appellant thirty days in which to exercise his right to file a response to counsel’s brief.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 250 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                       October 9, 2001.
Whereas the United States is engaged in military activity as a result of the 
        terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001;
Whereas such acts continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the 
        national security and foreign policy of the United States, including the 
        security of important energy supplies;
Whereas our Nation imports more than half of the crude oil it consumes from 
        other nations;
Whereas Congress found in the Energy Policy and Conservation Act that the 
        storage of substantial quantities of petroleum products will diminish 
        the vulnerability of the United States to the effects of a severe energy 
        supply interruption, and provide limited protection from the short-term 
        consequences of interruptions in supplies of petroleum products;
Whereas a severe energy supply interruption would have an adverse impact upon 
        American consumers and the economy;
Whereas the Strategic Petroleum Reserve has an authorized capacity of 
        1,000,000,000 barrels of crude oil, a current storage capacity of 
        700,000,000 barrels of crude oil, and approximately 545,000,000 barrels 
        of crude oil currently in storage; and
Whereas marginal wells in the United States provide an important base of 
        domestic crude oil production, make an important contribution to our 
        workforce and economy, are particularly sensitive to price fluctuations, 
        and are difficult and costly to reopen: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives urges the Secretary of Energy to 
increase the capacity of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to 1,000,000,000 
barrels of crude oil, to fill the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to its capacity as 
soon as practicable, and to consider purchasing from marginal wells that would 
otherwise cease production, consistent with current law.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IN AEPl Y PLEASE REFER TO

OFACE INDICATED:

_ 84141 PtNNSV\.vANlAAVENut

:::> Sum;: 101

o KAHsAsCITV,M064111

181&1 ~2'-'GJ9

FAX: f81Gl421-25G2

5SS INtltP£NOENCE

ROOM 1600

o CAPe (jlRAAOb\U, MC 63703

1S73l651~

FAlC 1573) 334-4278

CLAIRE McCASKILL

MISSOURI

COMMrrrets:

ARMED SERVICES

COMMERCE. SCIENCE AND

TRANSPORTATION

SPECIAL COMMIITEE ON AGING

HOMELAND SECURITY

AND GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS

AD HOC SUBCOMMITTEE

ON CONTRACTING OVERSIGHT

tinitEd ~tates ~matE~:.}:\HH.1ENr OfWASHINGTON. DC 20S10 . ~;';',; :~POORTA.TION

-- ~,,[ I PER, JIOi\!8>J

lui3 SEP I b P 12:

July 11,2013

9 t 5 EAsT Asll SmfET

COUJMDlA. MO 65201

{5731442-7130

FAX: (5731 442-1140

o

Ms. Brooke Chapman

Associate Director

US Department of Transportation, Office of Aviation Analysis

1200 New Jersey Ave NE

Washington, DC 20590-000 I

S850 DEL.MNI 80VLEVAAD

Svm>A

ST. lOUtS. MO 63112

1314) 367-1S64

Ft.J(: (1I14j3Gl.e$49

32'4 PAAl('cEHmAi..WEtrr

" sum! 101 "

o S~LD; MO 65806

... 14m~45'

FAXl4;7)'831-i349

http://mCC1l$l:tlt.scntltl!.gov

Dear Ms. Chapman,

1am writing today in support of Springfield-Branson (SGF) NationaTAii'poi't'S application for a -

Small Community Air Service Development Program grant, CPDA program number 20.930.

SOF airport has found that the residents of Southwest Missouri have deficient flight access to the

Southeastern United States. Plights from SOF to Atlanta already operate with near 90 percent

load factors. The approval of this grant would allow the airport to either add capacity to Atlanta or

to attract flights to US Airways's Charlotte hub, giving area residents more flight options.

The approval of this grant would allow a fast-growing region to increase its access to the national

air system after it has lost 30 percent of its available seats since 2008, including service to seveiitl'

major hub airports. This grant would increase economic development in the region and

accordingly the appLication has the support of many prominent members of the local business

community.

Thank you in advance for your full and fair consideration of this application. Please keep me

apprised of the progress of their application. -~•. -

Sincerely,

Claire McCaskill

United States Senator
#### § 850.20 Cause or probable cause determinations from Board investigation.

After an investigation conducted by the Board under § 850.15, the Board determines cause or probable cause and issues a report of that determination.