alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Graduates to use forensic technology to aid Afghan justice
 By MCC (SW) Maria Yager , Combined Joint Interagency Task Force 435
  CENTCOM
 BAGRAM AIR FIELD**,** Afghanistan (Dec. 20, 2010) —  The graduation of eleven Afghan Ministry of Interior criminal investigators from the Joint Expeditionary Forensics Facility 5 training program Dec. 18 marks a significant increase in the government of Afghanistan’s ability to use forensic evidence in criminal investigations. “This represents one of the most advanced achievements in the history of criminal investigative techniques in Afghanistan,” said Afghan National Army Lt. Gen. Mirza Mohammed Yarmand, MOI’s Criminal Investigative Division director, during the graduation ceremony. Forensics involves using scientific technology to gather and analyze evidence from a crime. With their new skills, the investigators will be able to better collect forensic evidence for use in identifying suspects and processing evidence for use in the Afghan criminal justice system. Through forensics, investigators can lift fingerprints from bomb making components and compare them against prints stored in a national data base, possibly leading to the identity of a suspect or linking the evidence to other investigations. “Afghan investigators began using print technology in the 1960’s to gather information from evidence,” said graduate Ghulom Easa. “We now have increased capacity to gather evidence in ballistics, firearms, forensic photography and DNA collection, allowing us to present evidence to the court that can free the innocent and jail the criminals.” The training program comprises two phases; a six-week forensic orientation portion and 16 weeks of formal instruction in the forensic disciplines of photography, latent print examination, DNA, firearms and ballistics. Training included familiarization of terms, equipment and processes as well as work on actual investigations. “The training was very good and very important for me,” said graduate Abdullah Weyar. “We will use these skills at MOI.” The investigators, assigned to the Criminal Technique Lab in Kabul, were the first Afghans to participate in the U.S. led training program sponsored by Combined Joint Interagency Task Force 435’s criminal investigation division here.  The next class is scheduled to begin in January. “If Afghanistan does not get knowledge, there will not be success because knowledge is power,” said Yarmand. “This is a great achievement for Afghanistan.” CJIATF-435, made up of U.S. service members, civilians and coalition members, partners with numerous Afghan ministries to achieve the desired end state of self-sustaining Afghan national detention facilities and rule of law (corrections) institutions compliant with Afghan and international law.
1210-AB32-2-1465.html[7/26/2015 5:31:25 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwg-q07e

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1961

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: J.Carlyne Woolf

General Comment

america is about freedom and it is that freedon that I have the right to take care of myself the government over

 how I live my lifehas no right
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 19

- 1639 Filed August 18, 2021
STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

vs. SEAN FARMER , Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Mark D. Cleve , Judge.

Sean Farmer appeals from his conviction for robbery in the first degree.
AFFIRMED.

Martha J. Lucey , State Appellate Defender, and Maria Ruhtenberg , Assistant Appellate Defender, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Katie Krickbaum (until withdrawal) and Kevin Cmelik , Assistant Attorney s General, for appellee.

Considered by Bower, C.J

. , and Vaitheswaran and Schumacher, JJ.2

BOWER , Chief Judge

. Sean Farmer appeals his conviction for first

- degree robbery. Farmer
asserts his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to file a motion to suppress an alleged ly overly suggestive identification . This court does not address ineffectiveness claim s on direct appeal. See Iowa Code § 814.7 (2019 Supp.) (“[T]he claim shall not be decided on direct appeal from the criminal proceedings.”) ; State v. Treptow , 960 N.W.2d 98, 107

– 08 (Iowa 20 21) (holding the statutory provision does not violate due process or deprive a defendant of his right to effective assistance of counsel); State v. Tucker , 959 N.W.2d 140, 151 (Iowa 2021) (holding the provision does not violate separation

- of

- powers doctrin e)

. I n the alternative, Farmer asks that the court adopt plain error

. “ We have repeatedly rejected plain error review and will not adopt it now. ” Treptow, 960 N.W.2d at 10 9

. Therefore we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          56,028
<SECURITIES>                                     2,092
<RECEIVABLES>                                  950,152
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,792
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,893
<PP&E>                                          17,599
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,815
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,083,020
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,872
<BONDS>                                        877,980
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           190
<OTHER-SE>                                     158,978
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,083,020
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                94,092
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,626
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                15,403
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              44,523
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,159)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,695)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,464)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,464)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.39)


</TABLE>
#### § 585.91 Scope.

This subpart establishes requirements for manufacturers of passenger cars, multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks and buses with a GVWR of 4,536 kg or less to submit a report, and maintain records related to the report, concerning the number of vehicles that meet the requirements of Standard No. 202a.
NUMBER 13-11-00231-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

SIX THOUSAND FIFTY-NINE DOLLARS, 

UNITED STATES CURRENCY, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 37th District Court

of Bexar County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Dennis Gay, attemped to perfect an appeal from a judgment signed on 

February 24, 2011, in cause no. 2011-CI-02296. Upon review of the documents before 

the Court, it appeared that there was no final, appealable judgment dated February 24, 

2011. On May 23, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that 
2

steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 

42.3. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from 

the date of receipt of the notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 

Appellant failed to respond to the Court=s notice. 

The Bexar County Clerk’s Office has informed this Court that no final judgment has 

been signed in this case. In terms of appellate jurisdiction, appellate courts only have 

jurisdiction to review final judgments and certain interlocutory orders identified by statute. 

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). 

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to 

correct the defect in this matter, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF 

JURISDICTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a),(c). 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 

21st day of July, 2011.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Heritage Worldwide, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350:





(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      November 14, 2008
              /s/
      Jean Claude
  MasJean
      Claude MasChairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer
 (Principal
      Executive Officer)
2 111 Wilson Boulevorcl, Sulle 500 Arllnglon. VA 22201. USA \'IwVI.oh rln e t .org PH 703.524.8800 FX 703.528.38 16 

# /!LlDI 

# ,.. 

# .... Air-Condition i ng,

# Heo~:t**ln ,**  __

# ",;;;;;;;;;;;**;,---..;;;;;;;;;';;;;;;;;;;iiiiii~** ond Refrigerotion Ins : ute

August 12, 2011

Memorandum Memorializing Ex Parte Communication

TO: expartecommun i cations@hg.doe

. gov (sent via email)

On August 9,2011, the Air-Conditioning, Heating and Refrigeration Institute's (AHRI) Unitary Small Engineering Committee, Compressors and Condensing Units Engineering Committee and Ductless Equipment Engineering Committee held a joint meeting to discuss the proposed standby power (offmode) efficiency standards contained in the June 27, 2011 Direct Final Rule (76 Fed. Reg. 37,408) (Docket Number EERE-2011-BT-STD-OOll / Regulatory Information Number (RIN) 1904-AC06). DOE staff participated in this meeting in order to identify data needs for their analysis, and to answer questions related to the associated test procedure rulemaking. Meeting attendees included the following:
Representing DOE : Ashley Armstrong John Cymbalsky

Representing AHRI: David Calabrese Lon Lemmond Aniruddh Roy Frank Stanonik Members of the AHRI Unitary Small Engineering Cmte.

# Ci**m; ~** 

David B

. Calabrese Senior Vice President, Policy
1210-AB32-2-1261.html[7/24/2015 9:58:06 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvu-h9bs

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1756

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I am smart enough to take care of my retirement. The US government---Obama or his cronies, has no business

 sticking their noses in my retirement. So, get out where you are not wanted or needed!!!!

I have always respected the office of the Presidency, and I do today, but the work Obama has promoted in his

 terms have been very disappointing. We the people have been put aside for the personal benefit of Obama and

 the rest of his little followers. This is an example of that push for personal power.
§ 501.4 Succession to Administrator. ( a ) The Deputy Administrator is the “first assistant” to the Administrator for purposes of the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998 (5 U.S.C. 3345-3349d) and shall, in the event the Administrator dies, resigns, or is otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of the office, serve as the Acting Administrator, subject to the limitations established by law.
( b ) In the event both the Administrator and the Deputy Administrator die, resign, and/or are otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of their respective offices, or in the event that both positions are vacant, the following officials, subject to paragraph (c) and in the order indicated, shall serve as Acting Deputy Administrator and shall perform the functions and duties of the Administrator, except for any non-delegable statutory and/or regulatory functions and duties: ( 1 ) The Chief Counsel;
( 2 ) The Executive Director;
( 3 ) Further officials as may be designated in an internal order on succession.
( c ) In order to qualify for the line of succession, officials must be encumbered in their position on a permanent basis.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI# I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-23-00000115

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

CONTINENTAL PACIFIC, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VANCE PHILLIP DUBUCLET, Defendant-Appellant, and PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and DOE DEFENDANTS 1-10, Defendants-Appellees.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 3CCV-21-0000096)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Wadsworth and Chan, JJ.)Upon review of the record, it appears that selfrepresented Defendant-Appellant Vance Phillip DuBuclet ( **DuBuclet** ) appeals from the Circuit Court of the Third Circuit's: (1) Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Interlocutory Decree of Foreclosure, and (2) Judgment, entered September 16, 2022. We lack jurisdiction over the appeal, as DuBuclet failed to file the Notice of Appeal within thirty days after September 16, 2022. See Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rules 4(a)(1) ("[T]he notice of appeal shall be filed within 30 days after entry of the judgment or appealable order[.]") and 26(e) ("The reviewing court for good cause shown may relieve a party from a default occasioned by any failure to comply with these rules, except the failure to give timely notice of appeal."); Bacon v. Karlin , 68 Haw. 648, 650, 727 P.2d 1127, 1129 (1986) ("an appellant's failure to file a timely notice of appeal Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-23-0000115 09-MAY-2023 08:19 AM Dkt. 22 ODSLJNOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI# I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
is a jurisdictional defect that can neither be waived by the parties nor disregarded by the court in the exercise of judicial discretion") (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are dismissed as moot. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, May 9, 2023.
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge
/s/ Derrick H.M. Chan Associate Judge

2
###### Editorial Note on Part 587

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 587 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 587.12 Incorporation by reference.

Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) Recommended Practice J211/1 Rev. MAR 95, Instrumentation for Impact Tests-Part 1—Electronic Instrumentation, is incorporated by reference in § 587.15 in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. A copy may be obtained from SAE at Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096. A copy of the material may be inspected at NHTSA's Docket Section, 400 Seventh Street, S.W., room 5109, Washington, DC, or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          28,049
<SECURITIES>                                     4,302
<RECEIVABLES>                                  803,994
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,492
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,726
<PP&E>                                          15,293
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,206
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 903,588
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,143
<BONDS>                                        679,587
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              469
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           190
<OTHER-SE>                                     166,199
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   903,588
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,332
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,279
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,112
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,219
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,449
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,455
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                994
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       994
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.56


 


BANKNORTH, N.A.


 


REVOLVING LINE OF CREDIT NOTE


 


	
  $1,000,000.00

  	
   

  	
  Boston, Massachusetts

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  March

  	
  , 2004

  



 


For value received, the undersigned, MFIC Corporation and Microfluidics
Corporation, both Delaware corporations (each and together the “Borrower”), hereby jointly and severally
promise to pay ON DEMAND, and if demand is not sooner made, then as provided in
the Loan Agreement (defined below), to the order of Banknorth, N.A., a national
banking association organized and existing under the laws of the United States
of America (the “Bank”), at its
main office in Burlington, Massachusetts, or at any other place designated at
any time by the holder hereof, in lawful money of the United States of America
and in immediately available funds, the principal sum of One Million
($1,000,000.00) Dollars or, if less, the aggregate unpaid principal amount of
all Revolving Loans made by Bank to Borrower under the Loan Agreement, together
with interest on the principal amount hereunder remaining unpaid from time to
time, computed on the basis of the actual number of days elapsed and a 360-day
year, from the date hereof until this Note is fully paid at the rates from time
to time in effect under the Loan and Security Agreement (All Assets) of even
date herewith (the “Loan Agreement”)
by and between Bank and Borrower. The principal hereof and interest accruing
thereon shall be due and payable as provided in the Loan Agreement.


 


This Note may be prepaid at any time without premium or penalty.


 


This Note is issued pursuant, and is subject, to the Loan Agreement,
which provides, among other things, for acceleration hereof. This Note is the
“Revolving Line of Credit Note” referred to in the Loan Agreement.


 


This Note is secured, among other things, pursuant to the Loan Agreement,
and may now or hereafter be secured by one or more other security agreements,
mortgages, deeds of trust, assignments or other instruments or agreements.


 


Borrower hereby agrees to pay all costs of collection, including
attorneys’ fees and legal expenses in the event this Note is not paid when due,
whether or not legal proceedings are commenced.


 


Presentment or other demand for payment, notice of dishonor and protest
are expressly waived.


 


All rights and obligations hereunder shall be governed by the laws of
the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and this Note shall be deemed to be under
seal.


 


	
  Witness:

  	
  MFIC CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Irwin J. Gruverman, Chief Executive Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  MICROFLUIDICS CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Irwin J. Gruverman, Chief Executive Officer
[Civ. No. 2942.

Fourth Dist.

Sept. 11, 1941.]

#### ALLAN R. MacCONNELL et al., Appellants, v. FRED WILBUR et al., Respondents.

Robert Loundagin for Appellants.

Jess G. Sutliff for Respondents.

MARKS, Acting P. J.

This is a motion to dismiss this appeal.

The certificate of the county clerk shows the following: Notice of entry of judgment was served and filed on May 27, 1941. Notice of appeal was served and filed on June 18, 1941. No order to prepare any transcript has been filed and no proceedings for the preparation of a transcript or bill of exceptions are pending. On August 11, 1941, the trial court terminated all proceedings for the preparation of a transcript on appeal.

Nothing has been filed here except the moving papers.

*873As appellants’ time for the preparation of a record on appeal has expired the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Griffin, J., concurred.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hamptons Luxury Homes, Inc.. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank Dalene, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Frank Dalene



Frank Dalene

Chief Financial Officer

September 12, 2005