alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

(2004/C 84 E/0223)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0251/04

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(3 February 2004)

Subject:   Labelling of bread

Recently, Italian bakers joined forces in a campaign to save their profession. They have drafted a proposal for a law to regulate the use of the term ‘fresh bread’, to ensure that it is applied only to bread made by traditional methods and sold on the day it is made. Consequently, only undertakings which are responsible for the whole production process from beginning to end will be able to call themselves ‘bakeries’, and will be able to label their bread as ‘fresh bread’. The problem that Italian bakers — and European bakers in general — have had to cope with for many years now is competition from bread sold in supermarkets. In most cases, supermarket bread is a product which is partially baked in the factory, frozen and transported to the place of sale, where it is placed in electric ovens to give it a similar colour, appearance and taste to freshly baked bread. By this means, the supermarkets manage to be extremely competitive on the market by reducing production costs. Bakers practising their profession in the traditional way are obliged — by the very nature of the product — to work at night, and consequently to pay their employees a higher rate, which greatly increases the cost of fresh bread. Consequently, consumers — as shown by recent surveys — are increasingly likely, on economic grounds, to buy their bread in supermarkets. Often, however, consumers base their decision to do so on a mistaken assumption, which is that the product they are buying is the same as, rather than similar to, the product offered by traditional bakeries.

In view of the foregoing,

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(27 February 2004)

The range of bakery products available in the EU is enormous, reflecting the multitude of regional and local customs and traditions.

Moreover, as the Honourable Member rightly states, these products are usually produced in whole or in part at their place of sale and are therefore not exported to other Member States to any significant extent.

This means that legislation setting harmonised, EU-level quality standards for bakery products would be difficult to achieve and would not meet a real need.

However, Member States, pursuant to the principle of subsidiarity, may decide to take measures of this kind at national level, within the rules laid down by Articles 28 to 30 of the EC Treaty.

----
From: Dave Payne [mailto:almostacowboy77@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 11:14 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

No one has the right to another person's wealth, property, labor, or freedom. 

Hands off my 401k. 

David Payne 

17046 E. Avenue W4 

Llano, CA 93544 

-- 

"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly 

inadequate to the government of any other." 

-John Adams
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10QSB
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         162,025
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  174,294
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,080
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               350,566
<PP&E>                                       3,334,102
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,038,791
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,706,646
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,127,003
<BONDS>                                      1,600,249
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,487
<OTHER-SE>                                     (65,094)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,706,646
<SALES>                                        278,722
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               297,459
<CGS>                                          115,651
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  380,902
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,406
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              58,813
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (143,663)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (143,663)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (143,663)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
From: Christopher D. Brown AICP

To: Hicks, Austin@ARB; Lewis, Monica@ARB; Sutkus, Carol@ARB

Cc: Tim Mitro; Sondra Spaethe; Galen Ribellia

Subject: FRAQMD Regulation 3.15 Submittal (Arc Coating SCM)

Date: Thursday, August 21, 2014 9:14:24 AM

Good morning –

At FRAQMD we have made a slight change to our process on submitting rules to ARB. Because of

email file size restrictions we now plan on using Dropbox for all submittal of adopted rules to ARB.

This will prevent the need for multiple emails for individual submittals.

Please let me know if the use of Dropbox is not acceptable to ARB.

Below is a link to the District’s Dropbox folder which contains the recently adopted Regulation 3.15

and all the supporting documentation.

· Rule 3.15 SIP Checklist

· Final Rule 3.15

· Final Rule 3.15 LO-SO

· Rule 1.1 – Final (8-1-2011)

· Affidavit of Publication

· Rule 3.15 Resolution

· Workshop & Written Comments

· Rule 3.15 SIP Evaluation Form

· Rule 3.15 Proposed Staff Report

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/t0zhhc9ck6quhhh/AADViEAAprm1yy4QvAbvC56wa

Please contact Galen Ribellia (cc’d) for all technical questions on this regulation.

Please contact Sondra Spaethe (cc’d) for all questions related to SIP issues or Air Quality Planning.

Thank you for your time.

Christopher D. Brown AICP

Air Pollution Control Officer

Feather River Air Quality Management District

1007 Live Oak Blvd., Ste B-3

Yuba City, Ca 95991

Phone 530-634-7659

Fax 530-634-7660

Web www.fraqmd.org
Pentagon officials identify troops for Afghanistan
 By Staff Sgt. Michael J. Carden , American Forces Press Service
  WASHINGTON (Dec. 22, 2009) – Defense Department officials today identified 6,000 servicemembers to deploy in 2010 as part of President Barack Obama’s order to increase the U.S. footprint in Afghanistan. About 3,400 soldiers from the 101st Airborne Division’s 2nd Brigade Combat Team are headed to Afghanistan in early summer, according to a statement released by the Pentagon. The soldiers are based out of Fort Campbell, Ky. Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates also approved deployment orders for about 2,600 support forces who will begin deploying to various locations at staggered times in the spring. The president announced Dec. 1 that the United States would send an additional 30,000 troops to Afghanistan. Some already have arrived. The majority of the surge forces will operate in southern Afghanistan, and are expected to arrive by summer’s end. Some 3,000 to 4,000 troops will arrive sometime in the fall to complete the plus-up, Pentagon officials said. The surge augments the international mission to train Afghan security forces and expel insurgent strongholds. White House and Pentagon officials anticipate the Afghan troop surge to last until July 2011, when U.S. and NATO forces are expected to begin handing over security responsibility to the Afghans. As of Dec. 12, 68,000 U.S. troops and 42,000 NATO and allied forces are serving in Afghanistan.
From: Brian Tucker [mailto:bttucker@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 1:31 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Attn: Lifetime Income RFI

NO NEVER NO NO NO NO NO. 

Keep your hands off my money. The government has proven it will spend all it can - not 

just all it has. It is presently waiting to inflate away it's past debts - and I will suffer from 

it. I don't need your help, taking my investments and returning me worthless Treasuries. 

Go get your (oops, I mean MY) money from the Social Security lockbox. Oh, It's empty? 

Just like government promises, or my retirement savings after you get your slimy hands 

on it. In fact, SS is a classic example of that (take my money now, give me worthless 

promises). I don't need more of that. 

NO corporation in the US would be allowed to exist if it ran it's books like the US 

Government. That's pretty much all I need to surmise that the USG is full of charlatans. 

And any Bernie Maddoff selling a scheme like SS would be in jail (oh, yeah - he is). 

So keep your immoral, greedy, grasping hands off what's mine. Stay out of pensions, 

retirement funds. Don't renege on Roth and 401K. 

Brian Tucker 

Marietta, GA
Docket: EBSA-2010-0007 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in 

Retirement Plans 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0007-0001 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options 

Document: EBSA-2010-0007-DRAFT-0059 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: Mark Smith 

Address: 

Washington, HI, 

Organization: concerned citizen 

General Comment 

Why bother soliciting "public opinions?" You're either going to do it or not do it based on those rapidly 

disappearing 1's and 0's on your Treasury spreadsheet. Is there some mandate stating you "have to 

solicit opinions" and waste a few more tax dollars? 

Just make up your mind and get it over with. 

PS Tell all your friends at Goldmann Sachs we said "thanks." : / 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: March 29, 2010 

Received: March 28, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80acb44d 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=Print&PrintId=0900006480acb4... 3/29/2010
----

(2004/C 84 E/1019)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0952/04

by Benedetto Della Vedova (NI) to the Commission

(29 March 2004)

Subject:   Procedure under Article 24 of Community Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88

In 1999, following the initiation of criminal proceedings against a former director relating to events dating back to the period 1991/1992 and unconnected with training activities, the Italian Ministry of Labour issued a training organisation with an order suspending financing for some EOS, Now, Adapt and Youthstart training programmes pending the outcome of those proceedings (procedure under Article 24 of Community Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88 (1)).

The organisation in question appealed first to the Regional Administrative Court and then to the Council of State against this ministerial decision. This appeal was rejected on the grounds that the ministry had not cancelled the measures granting financing, but reserved the right to do so on conclusion of the criminal proceedings.

A final judgement was subsequently delivered acquitting the former director. The organisation therefore asked the ministry to launch the projects and release the corresponding financing. The ministry replied that, despite the acquittal, it could refuse to consent to the conclusion of the new agreement and, therefore, also to the launching of the activities.

However, procedure under Article 24 of Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88 is not very clear. It is unclear what the procedure should be for the relaunch of activities (and/or conclusion of an agreement on the carrying-on of activities) and the release of funds when a final outcome has been reached on the circumstances resulting in the freezing of financing (e.g. acquittal of the accused).

Could the Commission therefore indicate:

Answer given by Mr Dimas on behalf of the Commission

(30 April 2004)

The decision to grant a subvention falls within the competence of the Designated Authority in Italy (in conformity with Community Regulations and the Operating Programme approved by the Commission, and Italian legislation). The case raised by the Honourable Member relates to an action decided upon by the Designated Authority managing the project in Italy and therefore, in order to either release the funds, or proceed with the activity, the matter should be addressed to the Designated Authority in Italy.

The Commission can provide contact details to the Honourable Member.

----

(1)OJ L 374, 31.12.1988, p. 1.

----
Exhibit 24

                        POWER OF ATTORNEY

                 COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
      Annual Report on Form lO-K for the Fiscal Year Ended
                        December 31, 1996

     The undersigned directors of COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY,
an Ohio corporation (the "Company"), do hereby constitute and
appoint E. LINN DRAPER, JR., G. P. MALONEY and P. J. DeMARIA, and
each of them, their attorneys-in-fact and agents, to execute for
them, and in their names, and in any and all of their capacities,
the Annual Report of the Company on Form lO-K, pursuant to Section
13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1996, and any and all amendments thereto, and to
file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them,
full power and authority to do and perform every act and thing
required or necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and
purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and
agents, or any of them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have signed these presents
this 26th day of February, 1997.



/s/ P. J. DeMaria                  /s/ G. P. Maloney
------------------------------     -------------------------------
P. J. DeMaria                      G. P. Maloney


/s/ E. Linn Draper, Jr.            /s/ James J. Markowsky
------------------------------     --------------------------------
E. Linn Draper, Jr.                James J. Markowsky


/s/ Henry W. Fayne                 /s/ J. H. Vipperman
------------------------------     --------------------------------
Henry W. Fayne                     J. H. Vipperman


/s/ Wm. J. Lhota
------------------------------
Wm. J. Lhota
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         658,064
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               29,454,138
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,219,370)
<INVENTORY>                                  5,435,021
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            41,645,577
<PP&E>                                      48,427,235
<DEPRECIATION>                            (10,228,295)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             157,579,767
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       32,431,573
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,651,867
<COMMON>                                    88,888,863
<OTHER-SE>                                   (867,255)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                90,673,475
<SALES>                                     35,743,083
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,743,083
<CGS>                                       24,983,138
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,328,160
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             751,527
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,743,633
<INCOME-TAX>                                   871,817
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   871,816
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10



</TABLE>
#### § 585.97 Records.

Each manufacturer must maintain records of the Vehicle Identification Number for each vehicle for which information is reported under § 585.96 until December 31, 2007.
#### Porter G. Denison, Appellant, v. William F. Taylor, Respondent.

Judgment reversed, new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by Learned, P. J.
# Nov. 28: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL in Syria and Iraq

/ Published Nov. 29, 2014

	November 28, 2014

	Release # 20141119	FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**Tampa, Fla. -** U.S. military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria Nov. 26-28 using bomber and remotely-piloted aircraft to conduct two airstrikes.  Separately, U.S. and partner nation military forces conducted thirteen airstrikes in Iraq Nov. 26-28 using fighter, attack, and remotely-piloted aircraft against ISIL terrorists.

	In Syria, an airstrike near Kobani struck an ISIL fighting position and an ISIL staging area.  Near Aleppo, an airstrike struck  a tactical ISIL unit.

	In Iraq, five airstrikes near Kirkuk destroyed five ISIL bunkers, four ISIL vehicles, a bulldozer and an ISIL fighting position and also struck a large ISIL unit and four tactical ISIL units.  Near Mosul, two airstrikes destroyed five ISIL vehicles and a heavy weapon, and also struck two ISIL units.  Near Ramadi, an airstrike struck a tactical ISIL unit. Near Ar Rutbah, an airstrike destroyed seven ISIL vehicles. Near Fallujah, an airstrike struck a tactical ISIL unit. Near Al Qaim, two airstrikes destroyed a fighting position and an armored vehicle.  An airstrike in Bayji struck an ISIL tactical unit, an ISIL vehicle and an ISIL occupied building.

	All aircraft returned to base safely. Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports.

	The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the terrorist group ISIL and the threat they pose to Iraq, the region and the wider international community. The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group's ability to project power and conduct operations. Coalition nations conducting airstrikes in Iraq include the U.S., Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Coalition Nations conducting airstrikes in Syria include the U.S., Bahrain, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Columbia Energy Group (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Michael W. ODonnell, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ Michael W. ODonnellMichael W. ODonnellPresident and Chief Executive Officer
 Date:   March 9, 2005
QSS-L2E

(03-01-2022) DC UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

U.S. Census Bureau

Office of the Director

Washington, DC 20233-0001

A Message from the Director, U.S. Census Bureau:

Thank you for your connued parcipaon in the Quarterly Services Survey. The U.S. Census Bureau’s

mission is to serve as the leading source of quality data about the nation’s people and economy. This survey

produces one of the Census Bureau’s many important economic measurements. Data from this survey

provide business leaders and policy makers with an up-to-date picture of the naon’s economic condion

and are a key element in estimating the quarterly Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

We invite you to browse through the wealth of data available through the Census Bureau’s website. Start by

viewing this survey’s results at: https://census.gov/services/index.html.

1. Register OR sign in at https://portal.census.gov

2. Add your authentication code.

3. Report by clicking on “REPORT NOW.” You can return to your account over multiple sessions to

complete the survey.

YOUR RESPONSE WILL BE KEPT STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. Information about the authority, confidentiality,

and burden of this data collection can be found on the back of this letter.

For assistance with completing this survey, please sign into your Census Bureau account or call our customer

help line at 1-800-772-7851, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern time.

Thank you in advance for your time and participation, and for helping the U.S. Census Bureau measure

America’s people and economy. 

Sincerely,

Robert L. Santos

Director

census.gov
QSS-L2E

(03-01-2022)

OMB Number

This collection has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The eight-digit OMB

approval number is 0607-0907 and appears in the top right corner of each reporting screen. Without this

approval, we could not conduct this survey.

Authority and Confidenality

Title 13, United States Code, Sections 131 and 182, authorizes the U.S. Census Bureau to conduct this

collection and to request your voluntary assistance. The Census Bureau is required by Section 9 of the same

law to keep your information confidential and use your responses only to produce statistics. The Census

Bureau is not permitted to publicly release your responses in a way that could identify your business,

organization, or institution. Per the Federal Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2015, your data are protected

from cybersecurity risks through screening of the systems that transmit your data.

Burden Esmate Statement

We estimate the Quarterly Services Survey will take between 10 and 15 minutes to complete. Factors such

as company size, complexity, and activity will affect your actual time to complete the survey. This estimate

includes the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed,

and complete and review the survey.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1211.html[7/22/2015 3:43:52 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvd-al73

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1211

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Rachael Kibbee

General Comment

I am wholly against any regulation that would affect the way I save my hard-earned money- for retirement or any

 other purpose.