alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.35


                                     [LOGO]

                                 March 1, 2004




Mark Ianni


Dear Mark:


     The full year 2003 results ended with a pre-tax profit of $5,769,150. This
allows the company to pay the 50% bonus level which was the $5,500,000 pre-tax
level. Enclosed is a check representing your bonus for 2003. We are thrilled to
be able to share the success of the company's recent performance with you in
this way.

     The bonus plan for 2004 has been adjusted to reflect the goals for the
company now that we have raised additional capital and become a public entity.
Your bonus will be based on the profit after-tax using a standard corporate tax
rate.

<Table>
<S><C>
10%   of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $1,066,000
20%   of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $1,566,000
30%   of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $2,066,000
40%   of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $2,566,000
50%   of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $3,066,000
66.7% of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $3,766,000
83.3% of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $4,666,000
100%  of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $5,666,000
</Table>

     The bonus period will be the fiscal months of January 2004 through December
2004. You must be an active employee of Bakers Footwear Group at the time
bonuses are paid to be eligible to receive your bonus.

     We are excited about the challenges and prospects in the coming year. We
hope it's profitable for all of us and our shareholders.


                                                     Sincerely,

                                                     /s/ Peter Edison

                                                     Peter Edison
ss



       2815 SCOTT AVENUE - SAINT LOUIS, MISSOURI 63103 - (314) 621-0699 -
                               FAX (314) 621-0708
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**Certification
      of Periodic Report by the Principal Accounting Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**


**As
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002**





Pursuant
      to, and for purposes only of, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned hereby certifies
      that (i) the Quarterly Report of Shore Bancshares, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
      quarter ended March 31, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of Shore Bancshares, Inc.





Date:
                May 8, 2008
            /s/
                Susan E. LeavertonSusan
                E. Leaverton, CPATreasurer/Principal
                Accounting Officer
§ 9.1 Purpose. ( a ) This part sets forth procedures governing the testimony of an employee in legal proceedings in which the United States is a party. It also sets forth procedures to be followed when an employee is issued a subpoena, order or other demand (collectively referred to in this part as a “demand”) by a court or other competent authority, or is requested by a private litigant, to provide testimony or produce records concerning information acquired in the course of performing official duties or because of the employee's official status. It also prescribes the policies and procedures of the Department with respect to the acceptance of service of legal process and pleadings in legal proceedings involving the Department.
( b ) The purposes of this part are to: ( 1 ) Conserve the time of employees for conducting official business;
( 2 ) Minimize the possibility of involving the Department in controversial issues not related to its mission;
( 3 ) Maintain the impartiality of the Department among private litigants;
( 4 ) Avoid spending the time and money of the United States for private purposes; and
( 5 ) To protect confidential, sensitive information and the deliberative processes of the Department.
( c ) Agency counsel, in his or her discretion, may permit an exception from any requirement in this part. The exception may be granted only when the deviation will not interfere with matters of operational or military necessity, and when agency counsel determines that: ( 1 ) It is necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice;
( 2 ) The Department has an interest in the decision that may be rendered in the legal proceeding; or
( 3 ) The exception is in the best interest of the Department or the United States.
For Office of Inspector General employees and documents, the Inspector General, in conjunction with the General Counsel of the Department, may permit an exception from any requirement of this part if the Inspector General determines, based on the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, that application of the requirement would be inappropriate.
1210-AB32-2-1398.html[7/26/2015 3:48:36 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jw3-t2y8

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1894

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Christina Decker

General Comment

I do not want the Department of Labor, or any other government entity, regulating or restricting use of retirement

 money in 401 Ks, IRAs, Roth accounts. I know how to use, and how I want to use, my own retirement money

 that I have saved.
# CJTF-OIR, partner forces liberate additional Syrian villages 

/ Published Jan. 22, 2019

January 19, 2019

Release # 20190119-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**SOUTHWEST ASIA –** Combined Joint Task Force – Operation Inherent Resolve continued supporting partner forces with precision air strikes and coordinated fires to degrade ISIS capabilities as well as building partner capability in the fight against ISIS in the Middle Euphrates River Valley, Syria, and Iraq, between Jan. 7 – 13, 2019. 

In Syria, precision Coalition air strikes targeted and killed more than 200 ISIS fighters, including four senior ISIS commanders near Marashidah and As Susah. Additionally, our Syrian partners liberated the towns of Al Kashmah, Sirat Masoud, and As Shafah within the past two weeks. ISIS used Improvised Explosive Devices in an unsuccessful attempt to slow down the military advance. 

In Iraq, Coalition and partner forces destroyed more than 730 IEDs discovered across Iraq. Additionally, coordinated airstrikes destroyed ten ISIS weapons caches, hiding places and one vehicle-borne IED. 

In Ninewah province, a patrol from the 20th Iraqi Army Division came under fire from ISIS while conducting clearance operations in the Atashana Mountains. The Ninewah Operations Command and Coalition forces reacted with a coordinated strike to destroy three tunnels used by the fighters for hiding and storing supplies. 

Additionally, the Mosul Police Academy began a training class which includes 25 female police officers. This brings the total number of female police in Mosul to approximately 49; a capability that directly counters the ISIS tactic of using female couriers for missions. 

In western Anbar, aircraft from the Anbar Operations Command received small arms fire during an aerial reconnaissance of suspected ISIS positions. The Iraqi Security Forces returned fire, resulting in the death of an estimated five ISIS fighters. 

These efforts and strikes further degrade the capability of ISIS, preventing them from consolidating resources and conducting activities across Iraq. 

United international efforts against ISIS will prevent its ability to recruit, train, equip, finance, plan, inspire and conduct violent extremists acts, regionally and globally. Coalition Force, comprised of 74 partner nations and five international organizations, are deployed in support of CJTF-OIR, working by, with and through partner forces to bring about the enduring defeat of ISIS. 

#DefeatISIS

#OpLastWarning
IN AEPl Y PLEASE REFER TO OFACE INDICATED:

_ 84141 PtNNSV\.vANlAAVENut :::> Sum;: 101 o KAHsAsCITV,M064111

181&1 ~2'-'GJ9 FAX:f81Gl421-25G2 5SS INtltP£NOENCE ROOM 1600 

### o CAPe (jlRAAOb\U, MC 63703

1S73l651~ FAlC 1573) 334-4278 CLAIRE McCASKILL

MISSOURI COMMrrrets: ARMED SERVICES COMMERCE. SCIENCE AND TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL COMMIITEE ON AGING HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS AD HOC SUBCOMMITTEE ON CONTRACTING OVERSIGHT 

# tinitEd ~tates ~matE~:.}:\HH.1ENrOfWASHINGTON. DC20S10

. ~;';',; 

## :~POORTA.TION

-- ~,,[ I 

## PER,JIOi\!8>J lui3 SEP Ib P 12: July 11,2013 9 t5 EAsT Asll SmfET COUJMDlA. MO 65201 {5731442-7130 FAX: (5731 442-1140



### o Ms. Brooke Chapman Associate Director US Department ofTransportation, Office ofAviation Analysis 1200New Jersey Ave NE Washington, DC 20590-000 I S850 DEL.MNI 80VLEVAAD Svm>A ST. lOUtS. MO 63112 1314)367-1S64 Ft.J(: (1I14j3Gl.e$49 32'4 PAAl('cEHmAi..WEtrr " sum! 101 " 

### o S~LD; MO 65806

... 14m~45' FAXl4;7)'831-i349 http://mCC1l$l:tlt.scntltl!.gov Dear Ms. Chapman, 1am writing today in support of Springfield-Branson (SGF) NationaTAii'poi't'S application for a - Small Community Air Service Development Program grant, CPDA program number 20.930. SOF airport has found that the residents ofSouthwest Missouri have deficient flight access to the Southeastern United States. Plights from SOF to Atlanta already operate with near 90 percent load factors. The approval ofthis grant would allowthe airport to either add capacity to Atlanta or to attract flights to US Airways's Charlotte hub, giving area residents more flight options. The approval ofthis grant would allow afast-growing region to increase its access to the national air system after ithas lost 30 percent ofits available seats since 2008, including service to seveiitl' major hub airports. This grant would increase economic development in the region and accordingly the appLication has the support ofmany prominent members ofthe local business community. Thank you in advance for your full and fairconsideration ofthis application. Please keep me apprised ofthe progress oftheir application. -~•. -
Sincerely,

Claire McCaskill United States Senator
#### § 580.12 [Reserved]
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

425 

CA 14-01660 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. 

 

 

BRENDA C. HARRINGTON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

MARY A. BRUNSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 1.)

 

FORSYTH, HOWE, O’DWYER, KALB & MURPHY, P.C., ROCHESTER (SANFORD R.

SHAPIRO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

MORGENSTERN DEVOESICK, PLLC, PITTSFORD (ROBERT D. SCHULTZ OF COUNSEL),

FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (J.

Scott Odorisi, J.), entered January 10, 2014. The order granted in

part and denied in part the motion of plaintiff for summary judgment. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988;

Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567; see

also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

Entered: June 19, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-14-00672- CV John Dale Dun n and P atric ia Lou ise Som m er, A ppellan ts v. Marr iott Hote l Corp. d/b /a Renaissance Austin Hotel, App ellee F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 200 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-1 2-0 0198 9, H ONO RAB LE GISELA D. TRI ANA, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N A p p e ll ants have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss appea l pursuant to a settle ment betwee n the par

ties. We gr ant the motion and dismiss t he appe al. SeeTex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) .

__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Jus tice Be fore Chief Justice Rose, Jus tices Goodwin a nd Field Dismissed on Appellants’ Motion Filed: January

30, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     Financial Data Schedule for INVU, Inc.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                                0001035039
<NAME>                                               INVU, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                           US DOLLARS

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                       FEB-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                         JUL-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        63,319
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          58,158
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     175,841
<PP&E>                                               415,406
<DEPRECIATION>                                       109,196
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       482,051
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                2,402,087
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             288,355
<OTHER-SE>                                           (3,261,500)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         482,051
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     54,319
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        1,030,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   (58,111)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (1,034,556)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (1,034,556)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.03)





</TABLE>
----

----

I Meddelanden

Kommissionen

----

Eurons växelkurs (1)

5 maj 2004

(2004/C 130/01)

1 euro == 

----

(1)

Källa: Referensväxelkurs offentliggjord av Europeiska centralbanken.

----

III Upplysningar

Kommissionen

----

MEDDELANDE OM FÖRSLAGSINFORDRAN

Det europeiska initiativet för demokrati och mänskliga rättigheter

Åtgärder till stöd för demokratin, gott styre och rättsstaten

EuropeAid/119508/C/G

(2004/C 130/02)

Europeiska kommissionen önskar få in förslag till åtgärder till stöd för demokratin, gott styre och rättsstaten i ett eller flera av de i riktlinjerna upptagna fokusländerna för det europeiska initiativet för demokrati och mänskliga rättigheter, med ekonomiskt stöd från Europeiska gemenskapernas program ”Europeiskt initiativ för demokrati och mänskliga rättigheter”.

Fullständiga riktlinjer för sökande (”Guidelines for applicants”) finns tillgängliga hos Europeiska kommissionen, EuropeAid, enhet F6, 54 Rue Joseph II, kontor 01/140, 1049 Bryssel, Belgien, och på följande webbplats:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/europeaid/cgi/frame12.pl

Preliminära förslagen skall vara inlämnade senast den 29.06.2004, kl. 16.00 medeleuropeisk tid.

----

----

MEDDELANDE TILL LÄSARNA

En specialutgåva av Europeiska unionens officiella tidning med texter till de rättsakter som institutionerna och Europeiska centralbanken har antagit före anslutningen kommer att offentliggöras på estniska, lettiska, litauiska, maltesiska, polska, slovakiska, slovenska, tjeckiska och ungerska. Volymerna i denna utgåva kommer att ges ut efter hand mellan den 1 maj och slutet av 2004.

I väntan på utgivningen av dessa volymer finns texterna därför tillgängliga på EUR-Lex i elektronisk form.

Adressen till webbplatsen är: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/sv/accession.html

----
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 376

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to apply the layover

requirements for conference reports during the last six days of a session

of Congress, to require that certain matter be included in joint explanatory statements accompanying conference reports, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 20, 2002

Mr. ISAKSON (for himself, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. COLLINS, Mr. NORWOOD, Mr.

BARR of Georgia, Mr. DEAL of Georgia, and Mr. CHAMBLISS) submitted

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to

apply the layover requirements for conference reports

during the last six days of a session of Congress, to

require that certain matter be included in joint explanatory statements accompanying conference reports, and

for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That (a) clause 8(a) of rule XXII of the

2 Rules of the House of Representatives (relating to layover

3 requirements for conference reports) is amended by strik4 ing ‘‘(1) Except as specified in subparagraph (2), it’’ and

5 inserting ‘‘It’’ and by striking subparagraph (2).
2

•HRES 376 IH

1 (b) Clause 8(b) of rule XXII of the Rules of the

2 House of Representatives (relating to layover require3 ments for amendments in disagreement) is amended by

4 striking ‘‘(1) Except as specified in subparagraph (2), it’’

5 and inserting ‘‘It’’ and by striking subparagraph (2).

6 (c) Clause 6(a)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the

7 House of Representatives (relating to privileged reports by

8 the Committee on Rules) is amended by striking ‘‘or of

9 clause 8’’.

10 (d) Rule XXII of the Rules of the House of Rep11 resentatives (relating to House and Senate relations) is

12 amended by adding at the end the following new clause:

13 ‘‘13. It shall not be in order to consider a conference

14 report to accompany a bill or joint resolution making or

15 continuing appropriations unless—

16 ‘‘(1) the joint explanatory statement of the

17 managers includes a separate part that clearly sets

18 forth each item of appropriation added by the com19 mittee of conference to fund a new program, project,

20 or activity and the program, project, or activity to

21 which it relates; or

22 ‘‘(2) the chairman of the Committee on Appro23 priations causes such matter to be printed in the
3

•HRES 376 IH

1 Congressional Record before consideration of the

2 conference report.’’.

Æ


 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
82

58

41

28

14

8

18

22

23

23

3

9

14

19

15

3

8

11

15

18

4

8 11 15

31

Bottom Second Third Fourth Fifth

Most Retirees Already Hold Most Lifetime Wealth in Annuity-Equivalent Form

Percentage of wealth by wealth quintile in 2006 for households with at least one 

member born between 1948 and 1953

Social Security Net housing wealth DB pension DC pension + IRA Other

93%

85%

77%

70%

52%

.

Note: Households with top and bottom 1 percent of total wealth excluded. Components may not add to 100 percent

because of rounding. Source: Gustman, Steinmeier, and Tabatabai, "What the Stock Market Decline Means for the Financial 

Security and Retirement Choices of the Near-Retirement Population," Michigan Retirement Research Center Working Paper 

WP2009-206, October 2009.
 

14

65

20

3

4

8

86

Spent all 

proceeds

Reinvested

some or all of 

the proceeds Rolled over all to IRA

Rolled over some to IRA, spent 

some

Rolled over some to IRA, 

reinvested some outside IRA

Reinvested all outside IRA

Reinvested some outside IRA, 

spent some

Bulk of Lump-Sum Distributions at Retirement are Rolled Over

Percentage of respondents

Note: Individuals retired from a defined contribution plan between 2002 and 2007. Data as of fall 2007.

Source: ICI Defined Contribution Plan Distribution Decisions Survey, 2007
 
1

1

4

10

29

72

Internet website

Financial software program

Book or article in a magazine, 

newspaper, or newsletter

Did not consult with any source

IRS rules or publications

Professional financial adviser

The Majority of Households Consult with a Professional Financial Adviser to Determine the Amount of 

Traditional IRA Withdrawals

Percentage of traditional IRA–owning households that made withdrawals in tax year 2008 

Note: Multiple responses are included.

Source: Investment Company Institute IRA Owners Survey, 2009
37

27

20

16

Likelihood of Withdrawing from Traditional IRA Before Age 70 1⁄2

Percentage of traditional IRA–owning households that did not take a withdrawal in tax year 2008

Source: Investment Company Institute IRA Owners Survey 

Not at all likely

Very likely

Somewhat likely

Not very likely
§ 593.8 Determinations on the agency's initiative. ( a ) The Administrator may make a determination of eligibility on his or her own initiative. The agency publishes in the Federal Register, affording opportunity for comment, a notice containing the information available to the agency (other than confidential information) relevant to the basis upon which eligibility may be determined.
( b ) No public hearing, argument, or other formal proceeding is held upon a notice published under this section.
( c ) The Administrator publishes a second notice in the Federal Register in which (s)he announces his or her determination whether the vehicle is eligible or ineligible for importation, and states the reasons for the determination. A notice of ineligibility also announces that no further determination for the same model of motor vehicle will be made for at least 3 months following the date of publication of the notice. There is no administrative reconsideration available for a decision of ineligibility.