alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of 1 

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 


PUBLICATION &, REGULATIONS 


BRANCH 


As of: August 20, 2010 

Received: August 09, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 20, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2c6dc 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-201O-0010-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0260 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

------------------------------------------------------------------,--­

Submitter Information 

Name: Bobby Lee Reed 

Address: 


11 Bonnie Lane 


Hopewell Junction, NY, 12533 


Submitter's Representative: Self 

Organization: Retired 

Government Agency Type: Federal 

Government Agency: HRSA 

General Comment 

I understand you are contemplating the exclusion of chiropractic services from the abominablle 

Obama healthcare plan. This is totally unacceptable from myself and all my friends with whom I 

have discussed the matter. Chiropractic care is the most cost efficient medical service we can 

imagine. Many of us have had chiropractic services solve musculo/skeletal problems where 

conventional doctors had prescribed, or suggested, more expensice and intrusive surgery. 

Abolish the entire fiasco if you will, but leave chiropractic services untouched and coverable by 

insurance policies, including medicare. 

https:llfdrns.erulernaking.netlfdrns-web-agency/cornponentlsubrnitterlnfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/20/2010
.\ 

TeamCMEuc 


Nationwide Network ofDOT Medical Examiners 

August 9,2010 

- "~'-= -'""'"Office of Consumeanfonnatlon arid msiifanceOveiSight'~- ­

Department ofHealth and Human Services 

Attention: OCll0-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 


Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 


I:::::::hee, DC PnJsIdent 

I

Pendleton, OR 97801 

Phone (541) 276-6032 

" Fax (541) 276-7062 

" Megehee@wtechllnk.net 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status as a 

Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Please find below my opinions and comments regarding the Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health 

Insurance Coverage Relating to Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable 

Care Act (PPACA). 

Every effort should be made to increase the number ofindividuals covered by PPACA, especially as ofJanuary 1, 

20t4 when most ofthe reform components (Insurance Exchanges, Subsidies, Tax Credits, etc.) come into play. 

The average consumer has a broad definition of "benefits." Consumers view their health plan beyond the covered , benefits, cost sharing, and the contribution levels associated with the plan. 

The Rule will result in confusion to the marketplace in its application. Clarity is critical both for the employer and 

the employee. 

A substantial portion ofthe employees will remain outside the PPACA as ofJanuary 2014 based on the current 

rules. Creating a large population of excluded individuals will add to costs, increase confusion, and mitigate the 

potential iIl1pact of the legislation. The Rule needs to be clear, reasonable, and with no ambiguities involved in 

'- - ~·7"';'determiningwhether-agn::iup1iealthpbmis"inori:>lit."~ -~ -'-""-"- . - -:~

We need to make decisions to create a sustainable health care system that will support a growing economy in the 

future. That means getting as many citizens across the country participating at the beginning to make it work and 

delivering on its promises to retain their sUp'port. 

~uforth~ity to;;em on thm regulation. 

Mk~~ . 
 4.24JSW 6th St ," , ' , 


Pendleton, OR 9780 I 


541-276-1938
#### § 826.35 Settlement.

The applicant and agency counsel may agree on a proposed settlement of the award before final action on the application, either in connection with a settlement of the underlying proceeding, or after the underlying proceeding has been concluded. If a prevailing party and agency counsel agree on a proposed settlement of an award before an application has been filed, the application shall be filed with the proposed settlement.
§ 604.44 Record. ( a ) The transcript of all testimony in the hearing, all exhibits received into evidence, all motions, applications requests and rulings, and all documents included in the hearing record shall constitute the exclusive record for decision in the proceedings and the basis for the issuance of any orders.
( b ) Any interested person may examine the record by entering the docket number at *http://www.regulations.gov* or after payment of reasonable costs for search and reproduction of the record.
**EXHIBIT
      32**


**Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**


**(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
      Code)**





Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of Xvariant, Inc. (N/K/A China Bionanometer Industries
      Corporation), a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to
      such
      officer's knowledge, that:





The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A #1 for the fiscal quarter ended June 30,
      2004
      (the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
      contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China Bionanometer Industries Corporation and will be retained by China
      Bionanometer Industries Corporation (formerly Xvariant, Inc.) and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Dated:
                September 13, 2007/s/
                Wang Wen’gengWang
                Wen’gengChief
                Executive Officer/s/
                Xiang QinXiang
                QinChief
                Financial Officer
#### § 826.33 Reply.

Within 15 days after service of an answer, the applicant may file a reply. If the reply is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the proceeding, the applicant shall include with the reply either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under § 826.36.
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: John Humes <JHumes@HEPN.com> Date: 7/7/2010 9:36 AM Subject: Re: Request for an Extension of the ICR Questionnaire Attachments: pic09273.jpg

Mr. Humes,

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire was received. To answer your question about the additional time to be requested - yes, normally the requester indicates the amount of time for their extension request. However, extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Please be aware that su bmittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date of your question naire unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely, (Embedded image moved to file: pic09273.jpg)

From: John Humes <JHumes@HEPN.com>

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/07/2010 08:54 AM

Subject: Request for an Extension of the ICR Questionnaire

Ms. Alicea-Virella,

We plan to request an extension to complete the Steam Electric Generating ICR questionnaire for one of our power plants. Do we need to request a specific amount of time to complete the questionnaire such as requesting an additional 30 or 45 or 60 days? Or, if the request is approved, does the agency determin e the amount of additional time allowed to complete the questionnaire?

I also left a message on your voice mail, but thought answering an email might be easier.

John Humes Environmental Specialist Hoosier Energy REC, Inc. 812-876-0374
#### § 89.13 Documentary evidence of compromise.

A compromise of any claim is not final or binding on the United States unless it is in writing, signed by an officer or employee authorized to compromise that claim.
Increased cooperation between locals, military leads to several caches
 By 1st Lt. Nicholas Rasmussen , Task Force Lethal
  
 PAKTYA PROVINCE, Afghanistan (May 18, 2011) — With tips from local villagers, U.S. and Afghan forces in Zormat District, Afghanistan, eliminated many weapons caches May 5-9. Soldiers from the Afghan National Army and Company C, 1st Battalion, 168th Infantry Regiment, Task Force Lethal, 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 34th Infantry Division, TF Red Bulls, found 11 rocket-propelled grenades, about 1,000 rounds of varying calibers, two confirmed improvised explosive devices and various other munitions and weapons in the five-day period. Soldiers found the caches after villagers tipped off the military on the whereabouts of the weapons as part of the Government of Republic of Afghanistan sponsored Guardians of Peace program, which rewards Afghans who come forward with information leading to the capture of insurgents or illegal weapons. The U.S. Soldiers said the work they’ve been doing to form relationships with the people living in their area of operations led to the increase in amount and quality of the tips received. “A lot of it has to do with what we did over the winter,” said U.S. Army Sgt. Michael Jenkins of Westminster, Md., an intelligence analyst with Co. C. “We went out and made friends with the locals.” In one instance, while at a local Madrassa, the Soldiers received a tip that insurgents buried an improvised explosive device near a clinic in Sadar Kheyl Village. “This happens quite a bit,” added U.S. Army Spc. Tyler Malom, of Polk City, Iowa, a rifleman in Co. C’s 1st Platoon. “We’ll be out on patrol and somebody will come and tip us off about something in the road.” In another instance, the ANA platoon leader, Lt. Pallawan, received a phone call about another suspected IED. Pallawan and his men investigated the site and found a sack with five mortar rounds, which they brought back to their combat outpost to be destroyed. “The fact that the ANA were able to gather intelligence and act on it without the support of coalition forces shows their growth as a (company),” remarked U.S. Army Capt. Michael Minard of Bettendorf, Iowa, the commander of Co. C. “The people are really beginning to trust us,” said Pallawan. “You can tell this is true not only because of the number of tips we receive, but also by the way we are received in the villages.”
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.24 MB)
 
 U.S. BS 17 Bright Star 2017 Exercise Bright Star 17 Centcom
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### Mary E. Sullivan, complainant, v. Securities Company of the Oranges, a corporation of New Jersey, et al., defendants.

[Decided May 10th, 1933.]

*Mr. Daniel A.*Dugan, for the complainant.

*Mr. John A. McKenna,*for the West Orange Trust Company in liquidation by William H. Kelly, &c.

Stein, V. C.

The bill of complaint is brought to foreclose a mortgage given by the Securities Company of the Oranges, held by the complainant, for $45,000 on property in the town of West Orange, a portion of which is owned by the West Orange Trust Company. The defendant West Orange Trust Company, in liquidation by William H. Kelly, commissioner of banking and insurance, in its answer sets up a release of part of the mortgaged premises. Complainant’s proof is that there is due for the: principal on her mortgage the sum of $44,000, plus interest to date of $3,890. The only proof before me of the alleged release is a certified copy of the record thereof. The release of mortgage covers premises of greater value than the remaining portion of the mortgaged premises. The release recites the consideration of $1 and purports to be acknowledged before M. D. Hayward, notary public, August 15th, 1929. Hayward is dead. The complainant denies that she was ever requested to, or did, execute this release. Walter D. Van Kiper, who was, at the time of the supposed execution *366of the release, the president of the West Orange Trust Company, as well as the president of the Securities Company of the Oranges, testified that he, too, had no knowledge concerning the execution of the release and that he never saw the original. He recalls that there was a discussion concerning the release and says that a search in his office by himself and others in his employ resulted in a failure to find the original document. Alexander Kranke, in charge of the West Orange Trust Company for the commissioner of banking and insurance, examined the records of the bank in search of the release in vain. Eoger A. Williams, secretary and treasurer of the securities company, testified to like effect.

The legal inference to be drawn from this testimony leads me to the conclusion that the signature of the complainant to the release of record was forged.

There will be a decree for the complainant for principal and interest in the sum of $47,890.
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 9:48 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Cc:

Subject: Department of Labor: RIN-1210-AB39

Re: RIN-1210-AB39

I am writing to support the adoption of the Proposed Regulations issued by the DOL on November 18, 

2015.

I am a disability recipient under an employer-sponsored disability plan that falls under the ERISA 

regulations. Currently the deck is stacked against disabled individuals seeking to obtain disability 

benefits that they are entitled to. Current policies and procedures are often difficult to obtain, difficult 

to understand, and extremely difficult to navigate. To expect individuals who are very ill to navigate 

this complex system is not realistic. Many ill individuals are operate under the misguided assumption 

that physician documentation of their disability will suffice to support the receipt of disability claims that 

they have purchased through paycheck deductions. The Proposed Regulations give disability claimants 

more procedural rights and safeguards to protect their benefits. Given the lack of a jury trial, the 

prohibition against punitive damages, and the deferential standard of review of denied claims, these 

proposed changes are critical to provide more fairness to disabled individuals.

Thank you for considering my comments.

RN, Onclogy Certified Nurse
From: rick a [mailto:newtrick@bellsouth.net] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 4:18 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

Leave our retirement money alone!! You have already screwed up everything else. The best 

thing for US citizens is for the federal government to stay out of our lives. In case you have 

forgotten, the founders outlined the limit powers of the federal government in the constitution. We 

the People demand adherence to the constitution.

 

In Liberty,

Rick Anderson
§ 604.1 Purpose. ( a ) The purpose of this part is to implement 49 U.S.C. 5323(d), which protects private charter operators from unauthorized competition from recipients of Federal financial assistance under the Federal Transit Laws.
( b ) This subpart specifies which entities shall comply with the charter service regulations; defines terms used in this part; explains procedures for an exemption from this part; and sets out the contents of a charter service agreement.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BASALITE CONCRETE PRODUCTS,

LLC; PACIFIC COAST BUILDING

PRODUCTS, INC.,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE

COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA;

CHARTIS SPECIALTY INSURANCE

COMPANY, formerly known as

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL

SPECIALTY LINES INSURANCE

COMPANY

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 13-16223

D.C. No. 2:12-cv-02814-WBSEFB

ORDER*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted August 14, 2015 

San Francisco, California

FILED

SEP 04 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Before: TALLMAN and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges and ROSENTHAL,**

District Judge.

 

We AFFIRM the district court and adopt as the basis for our decision the

well-reasoned Memorandum and Order granting the motion to dismiss.

 ** The Honorable Lee H. Rosenthal, District Judge for the U.S. District

Court for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation.

2
S A N I T I Z E D

EPICLON HP-4700

BIODEGRADATION TEST
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23
 
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-37920), in
the post-effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement Form S-8 (No.
33-2-76435) and in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-5485) of
Community Psychiatric Centers of our report dated January 31, 1996, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Community
Psychiatric Centers and Subsidiaries as of November 30, 1995 and the year then
ended, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November
30, 1995.
 
Price Waterhouse LLP
 
Los Angeles, California
February 26, 1996
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               9
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      4,194
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      3,762
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     26,832
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       26,671
<LOANS>                                   656,961
<ALLOWANCE>                                 8,834
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            883,981
<DEPOSITS>                                611,731
<SHORT-TERM>                              149,939
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        12,875
<LONG-TERM>                                35,000
<COMMON>                                      127
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                 74,309
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>            883,981
<INTEREST-LOAN>                            41,020
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           8,725
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           49,745
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                         20,873
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         29,152
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                      20,593
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                 950
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              5
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                            16,689
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             5,707
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                3,382
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0.25
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                               8.01
<LOANS-NON>                                11,650
<LOANS-PAST>                                5,412
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                           14,393
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                            8,652
<CHARGE-OFFS>                               1,577
<RECOVERIES>                                  809
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                           8,834
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                        8,834
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         0
        


<PAGE>
#### Jaquith *v.*Benoit.

Whether a declaration in debt may be amended by filing a count in case is a question determinable at the trial term.

In an action to recover double damages for the bite of a dog, only the actual damages are to be assessed by the jury.

Debt, to recover double damages for the bite of a dog. Subject to the defendant’s exception, the court allowed the plaintiff to amend by changing the form of action to case, and held that the defendant was not entitled, as a matter of right, to have the. jury double the damages.

*Wason & Jackson,*for the plaintiff.

*Henry B. Atherton,*for the defendant.

Young, J.

The question of allowing the amendment was for the trial term. The defendant had no right to demand that the-merely ministerial act of doubling the damages should be performed by the jury; for it is the province of the jury to find facts*, and the only question of fact in this part of the case was the plaintiff’s actual damages.

*Exceptions overruled.,*

Peasbee, J., did not sit: the others concurred.