alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 601.32 Petitions for rulemaking or exemptions. ( a ) Any interested person may petition the Administrator to establish, amend, or repeal a rule, or for a permanent or temporary exemption from FTA rules as allowed by law.
( b ) Each petition filed under this section must: ( 1 ) Be submitted in duplicate to the Administrator, Federal Transit Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590;
( 2 ) State the name, street and mailing addresses, and telephone number of the petitioner; if the petitioner is not an individual, state the name, street and mailing addresses and telephone number of an individual designated as an agent of the petitioner for all purposes related to the petition;
( 3 ) Set forth the text or substance of the rule or amendment proposed, or of the rule from which the exemption is sought, or specify the rule that the petitioner seeks to have repealed, as the case may be;
( 4 ) Explain the interest of the petitioner in the action requested, including, in the case of a petition for an exemption, the nature and extent of the relief sought and a description of the persons to be covered by the exemption;
( 5 ) Contain any information and arguments available to the petitioner to support the action sought; and
( 6 ) In the case of a petition for exemption, except in cases in which good cause is shown, the petition must be submitted at least 120 days before the requested effective date of the exemption.
###### Editorial Note on Part 587

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 587 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 587.13 General description.

The offset deformable barrier is comprised of two elements: a fixed rigid barrier and a deformable face (Figure 1). The fixed rigid barrier is adequate to not deflect or displace more than 10 mm during the vehicle impact. The deformable face consists of aluminum honeycomb and aluminum covering.
From: Tod [mailto:Mail@ByTod.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 11:30 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

This is not about the advantages and disadvantages of annuities. This is about right and 

wrong. 

Retirement accounts are not the property of the government. Washington has no business 

encouraging or deciding how people should save or spend their money. 

If the government succeeds in taking over retirement accounts, they may well spark a 

revolt. 

Cancel the plan. Leave people free to decide what to do with their lives and their money. 

Tod 

Optimal Living Blog: HUhttp://Blog.ByTod.comUH

Goal Meter for iPhone: HUhttp://tod.fm/x/gmUH
#### § 585.16 Records.

Each manufacturer shall maintain records of the Vehicle Identification Number of each vehicle for which information is reported under § 585.15(c) until December 31, 2011. Each manufacturer shall maintain records of the Vehicle Identification Number of each vehicle for which information is reported under § 585.15(d)(2) until December 31, 2013.

[72 FR 62142, Nov. 2, 2007]
-----Original Message----- 

From: Matthew.Tindall@fluor.com [mailto:Matthew.Tindall@fluor.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 11:03 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 

Please, leave me and my money alone. 

The idea that the government will "manage" my 401(k) is a violation of 

my property rights. The investments that I choose and the earnings or 

losses reaped are my own private affair. Besides being a violation of 

my property rights, the government has shown no ability to manage 

finances, and actually lessens the value of my earned wealth through 

inflation of the money supply. If I were allowed to keep my 

contributions to Social Security and invest it how I saw fit, I would 

be much better off in the long run, assuming even a minimal return on 

my investment. The Social Security fund is filled with nothing but 

IOU's and government would do the same to my 401(k) - spend the money 

now and pay me back later at a ridiculously low interest rate with 

debased currency. 

Dismantle the welfare state and the grab for money would end. 

Matt Tindall, P.E. 

Control Systems Engineer 

Fluor Corporation 

47 Discovery 

Irvine, CA 92618 

Phone: 949.349.2312 

------------------------------------------------------------ 

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity 

to which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, businessconfidential and/or privileged material. 

If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby 

notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, 

distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this 

message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact 

the sender and delete the material from any computer. 

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender 

and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company. 

------------------------------------------------------------
From: Leonard Pistek [mailto:leonard.pistek@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 11:47 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: 401(k)

I can only say this you the gov. LEAVE MY MONEY ALONE 

 I KNOW whats best, not you IDIOTS 

 

 

 leonard pistek
From: Tom [mailto:midnitepoet@comcast.net] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 4:11 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

Dear Sirs, 

It is not clear thinking to pass a law or regulation that requires significant ownership of 

Treasury Bills or Bonds in Retirement Plans. One of the Unintended Consequences will 

be a crash in the Stock Market, the likes of which you have not yet seen as Mutual Funds 

are forced to liquidate stocks and buy Treasuries. It will destroy our Stock Markets, our 

retirees and even Wall Street will be damaged. 

Please find another way to unload your paper or stop spending so much. 

If it happens, my friends and I will attempt to vote out all incumbents at every election 

thereafter, until we have got this ridiculous government under control. 

Tom
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

Received: October 18, 2017

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1k1-8zal-u82m

Comments Due: October 27, 2017

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2015-0017

Claims Procedure for Plans Providing Disability Benefits; Extension of Applicability 

Date

Comment On: EBSA-2015-0017-0291

Claims Procedure: Plans Providing Disability Benefits

Document: EBSA-2015-0017-DRAFT-0364

Comment on FR Doc # 2017-22082

Submitter Information

Name: Mark DeBofsky

Address: 200 W. Madison St., Suite 2670

Chicago, IL, 60606

Email: mdebofsky@debofsky.com

Phone: 312-561-4040

General Comment

I commented on this regulation after it was proposed and commended the Department 

of Labor for updating the disability insurance regulations. After the comment period 

ended, the Department of Labor spent nearly a year taking all of the comments into 

consideration prior to the issuance of final regulations after clearance from OMB.

Without any public disclosure of communications received from the insurance 

industry, the effective date of the regulations has been delayed by 90 days. Why? If 

there was a legitimate reason to question the regulations, it should have been publicly 

disclosed so it could be challenged. I have heard rumors that the insurance industry 

has complained that the cost of implementing the regulations might significantly 

increase premiums. If that is true, there must be public disclosure of any actuarial 

studies or other studies that would support such a proposition. The entire point of a 

notice and comment period is to permit public comment and an open discussion -
government in secrecy is contrary to the the Administrative Procedures Act and every 

initiative to make government actions open and transparent.

The application of most of the new regulations to claims filed on or after January 1, 

2018 gave the insurance industry more than adequate notice and opportunity to 

implement procedures in order to comply with the law. Further delay will serve no 

purpose other than to appease the industry at the expense of claimants whose right to 

receive promised benefits is unfairly compromised. The current schedule is more than 

adequate - keep it in place.
# Afghan Air Force Conducts First UH-60 Black Hawk Operational Mission

/ Published May 10, 2018
KANDAHAR AIRFIELD, Afghanistan – Afghan Air Force UH-60 Black Hawk crews conducted their first operational mission inHelmand Province, Afghanistan, May 8. 
The mission, which was in support of the Afghan provincial elections, took place just one day after the first 31 Afghan Air Force (AAF) members graduated from mission qualification training, making them the first fully-qualified UH-60 Black Hawk Afghan air crews.

“It means a lot to be one of the first people to graduate,” said the air mission commander for the first Afghan operational mission. “We feel ready and are so excited, happy and proud to be part of this.”

According to Brig. Gen. Phillip Stewart, Train, Advise and Assist Command-Air commander, the introduction of the Black Hawk helicopters and the graduates themselves represent a shift to a new generation of leaders, selected based on merit and professionalism, and entrusted to help create a modern and sustainable Afghan Force.

“The introduction of the UH-60 marks the dawning of a new age for the Afghan Air Force,” said Stewart. “All of those who graduated mission qualification school have shown tremendous hard work and dedication. Not only are these aircraft and students the physical embodiment of progress, but they also represent a generational shift from the older soviet-trained forces to the younger and more progressive western-trained and educated fleet.” 

The UH-60 will enhance the Afghan Air Force helicopter fleet andeventually replace the capabilities currently provided by the Mi-17, which is no longer a sustainable platform. Its implementation is expected to ease the burden on the aging Mi-17 fleet and transition the Afghan Air Force into a modern and sustainable platform for the future.

According to Maj. Gen. Mohammad Shoaib, Afghan Air Force commander, the Black Hawks are ideal for Afghanistan because they are suitable for the terrain and weather, and they possess more modern technology.

The first UH-60 Black Hawks arrived in Afghanistan seven months ago, allowing the training program to begin 18 months ahead of schedule. Currently the Afghan Air Force has 13 of these aircraft in their fleet with two more scheduled to arrive each month through the end of 2018.
-----Original Message----- 

From: darrell.black@cox.net [mailto:darrell.black@cox.net] 

Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 2:55 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 

DON'T EVEN THINK ABOUT 'EVER' DOING ANYTHING LIKE THIS PROPOSAL. I AM 

68 YEARS OLD AND HAVE FRUGALLY SAVED ALL OF MY LIFE TO HAVE ADDITIONAL 

FUNDS TO LIVE ON AT THE TIME OF RETIREMENT. YOU, THE GOV'T, HAS TOTALLY 

ENCOURAGED THIS OVER MANY, MANY YEARS ON TOP OF EVERYTHING ELSE. 

YOU WANT BLOOD IN THE STREETS OF AMERICA, JUST DO THIS ACTION WITH THE 

AMERICAN CITIZENS 401K, IRA. 

NEVER IN MY LIFETIME ....OR THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

HAS SUCH A RUTHLESS, TOTALITARIAN, SOCIALISTIC ACTIONS HAVE EVER BEEN 

CONSIDERED TO BE DONE. 

NOTE THAT I SAY 'AN AMERICAN CITIZEN' ,,,,NOT 'AN AMERICAN TAXPAYER'! 

THERE IS A TOTAL DIFFERENCE. THIS EFFECTS EVERY AMERICAN WITH A 401K, 

IRA, ETC..... THIS MONEY IS NOT THE AMERICAN GOV'TS BUT BELONGS TO 

EACH AND EVERY AMERICAN TO DO WHAT HE WISHES WITH IT!!!! DON'T EVEN 

THINK ABOUT IT ANY FURTHER! 

"DON'T TREAD ON 

ME"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

Darrell Black 

31990 S. 624th Place 

Grove, Oklahoma 74344
§ 599.400 Transfer or consignment by dealer of trade-in vehicle. ( a ) *In general.* ( 1 ) A trade-in vehicle accepted as part of an eligible transaction may be provided for disposal by a dealer either to a disposal facility or to a salvage auction, as described in and subject to the conditions of § 599.201 of this part.
( 2 ) Dealers, disposal facilities, and salvage auctions involved in the disposal of the trade-in vehicle must each comply with the applicable provisions of this subpart.
( b ) *Transfer by dealer or salvage auction to a disposal facility.* If the trade-in vehicle is transferred by the dealer or salvage auction to a disposal facility, the disposal facility must, as a condition of the transfer: ( 1 ) Make the certifications contained in the Disposal Facility Certification Form in Appendix E to this part, signed by an official with authority to bind the disposal facility;
( 2 ) At the time of the transfer, deliver the signed Disposal Facility Certification Form to the dealer or salvage auction that transferred the trade-in vehicle; and
( 3 ) Comply with the requirements and limitations of § 599.401.
( c ) *Consignment by dealer to a salvage auction.* If the trade-in vehicle is consigned by the dealer to a salvage auction, the salvage auction must, as a condition of the consignment: ( 1 ) Make the certifications contained in the Salvage Auction Certification Form in Appendix F to this part, signed by an official with authority to bind the salvage auction;
( 2 ) At the time of the consignment, deliver the signed Salvage Auction Certification Form to the dealer that authorized the salvage auction to sell the trade-in vehicle. (1) Make the certifications contained in the Salvage Auction Certification Form to the dealer that authorized the salvage auction to sell the trade-in vehicle; and
( 3 ) Comply with the requirements and limitations of § 599.402.
Editorial Note
Editorial Note: At 74 FR 37902, July 29, 2009, § 599.400 was added, however, there was a codification error in the original document resulting in two paragraphs (c)(1).
#### § 802.15 Fees.

No fees shall be charged for providing the first copy of a record, or any portion thereof, to individuals to whom the record pertains. The fee schedule for other records is the same as that appearing in the appendix to part 801 of this chapter, implementing the FOIA, as amended from time to time, except that the cost of any search for and review of the record shall not be included in any fee under this Act, pursuant to subsection (f)(5) of the Act.
FROM LES BENNINGTON, CLU, LUTCF, ChFC

ne ICK MEMO
P.O. BOX 757
1260 EAST U.S. HIGHWAY 20-26-87
pate: PLE - 200 5

GLENROCK, WYOMING 82637-0757

To ATTENTION: £7728 cet. SEC AD
SUBJECT Ce 2% A
nee ZLrreée st Feedb
WASH, D.C. ROBO

:
|
ui
|
‘
|
June 27, 2015

FAA RE: Section 333 exemption
To whom it may concern: Pivotal Ventures, LLC DBA Pivotal Photo is seeking a Section 333 exemption from the FAA to operate unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and business purposes. Pivotal Photo intends to use an UAS(s) to engage in professional wedding photography, real estate, cinema photography, et al. within the immediate region of South Dakota and Nebraska. Pivotal Photo further intends to work directly with the local airport (YKN) personnel to coordinate safe, operating time frames. The UAS(s) utilized by Pivotal Photo will weigh less than 5lbs and each flight will be limited to twenty minutes or less. Detailed UAS drawings and descriptions will be attached. Sincerely yours,

Tony Maibaum Managing Member Pivotal Ventures, LLC DBA Pivotal Photo 

## Pivotal.Photo

605-665-1636 management@pivotalphoto.com 2802 Kentucky Ave Yankton, SD 57078
**EXHIBIT99.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

I, John R. Lyon, President and Chief Executive Officer of Vista MedicalTechnologies, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(a)           theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter endedSeptember 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)           theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  November 12, 2002

 
| /s/  JOHN R.  LYON               |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| John R. Lyon                          |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBoeing/NASA composite components flight service evaluationThis tenth and final flight service report covers the flight service experience of 111 graphite-epoxy spoilers on 737 transport aircraft after 15 years of worldwide service. As of June 30, 1989, a total of 2,593,741 spoiler flight hours and 3,499,941 spoiler landings have been accumulated by the fleet. The high time spoiler had 42,007 flight hours. Results of 15 years of residual strength tests conducted on selected spoilers are reported. In addition, the flight service histories of composite elevators and stabilizers developed under NASA contracts NAS1-14952 and NAS1-15025, respectively, are reported.Document ID19900013293Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsCoggeshall, Randy L.*(Boeing Co. Seattle, WA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1989Subject CategoryComposite MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:181898NASA-CR-181898Accession Number90N22609Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-11668Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900013293.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Adelbert P. Little, Appellant, *v.*Charles W. Mayer, Respondent.

*Little*v. Mayer, 134 App. Div. 993, affirmed.

(Argued May 10, 1911;

decided May 30, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 21, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court on trial at an Equity Term in an action to enjoin the defendant from continuing the manufacture and sale of machines embodying trade secrets of the plaintiff.

*Clarence W. McKay*for appellant.

*Nelson E. Spencer*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Collin, JJ. Absent: Chase, J.
From: Iwaki, Lawrence (AS) [mailto:larry.iwaki@ngc.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 3:37 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

I just thought that I’d state for the record that I believe this to be a great idea. I’d 

like to have my 401k in Treasuries. After all, what security class is safer?

Larry Iwaki

“The Department of Labor and the Department of the Treasury (the "Agencies") are 

currently reviewing the rules under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act 

(ERISA) and the plan qualification rules under the Internal Revenue Code (Code) to 

determine whether, and, if so, how, the Agencies could or should enhance, by 

regulation or otherwise, the retirement security of participants in employersponsored retirement plans and in individual retirement arrangements 

(IRAs) by facilitating access to, and use of, lifetime income or other 

arrangements designed to provide a lifetime stream of income after 

retirement. The purpose of this request for information is to solicit views, 

suggestions and comments from plan participants, employers and other plan 

sponsors, plan service providers, and members of the financial community, as well 

as the general public, on this important issue.

13. Should some form of lifetime income distribution option be required for defined 

contribution plans (in addition to money purchase pension plans)? If so, should that 

option be the default distribution option, and should it apply to the entire 

account balance? To what extent would such a requirement encourage or discourage 

plan sponsorship?”
# Carrier Strike Group 11 destroyers support maritime security in U.S. 5th Fleet

/ Published Nov. 13, 2020
U.S. 5TH FLEET AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY, 

                Guided-missile destroyer USS John Paul Jones (DDG 53) transits the Arabian Gulf, Oct. 27. John Paul Jones is part of the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group, deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations, and currently supporting Coalition Task Force Sentinel, the operational arm of the International Maritime Security Construct, to ensure maritime security and stability in the critical waterways of the Central region. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Aja Bleu Jackson)            

                Carrier Strike Group 11 Destroyers Support Maritime Security in U.S. 5th Fleet            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Petty Officer 3rd Class Aja Jack

VIRIN: 201027-N-XG173-538
# IRGCN Vessels Conduct Unsafe, Unprofessional Interaction with U.S. Naval Forces in Arabian Gulf

/ Published April 15, 2020
NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY BAHRAIN, 
On April 15, eleven Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy (IRGCN) vessels repeatedly conducted dangerous and harassing approaches of the USS Lewis B. Puller (ESB 3), USS Paul Hamilton (DDG 60), USS Firebolt (PC 10), USS Sirocco (PC 6), USCGC Wrangell (WPB 1332) and USCGC Maui (WPB 1304) while the U.S. vessels were conducting joint integration operations with U.S. Army AH-64E Apache attack helicopters in the international waters of the North Arabian Gulf.

The IRGCN vessels repeatedly crossed the bows and sterns of the U.S. vessels at extremely close range and high speeds, including multiple crossings of the Puller with a 50 yard closest point of approach (CPA) and within 10 yards of Maui's bow.

The U.S. crews issued multiple warnings via bridge-to-bridge radio, five short blasts from the ships' horns and long range acoustic noise maker devices, but received no response from the IRGCN.

After approximately one hour, the IRGCN vessels responded to the bridge-to-bridge radio queries, then maneuvered away from the U.S. ships and opened distance between them. 

The IRGCN's dangerous and provocative actions increased the risk of miscalculation and collision, were not in accordance with the internationally recognized Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGS) "rules of the road" or internationally recognized maritime customs, and were not in accordance with the obligation under international law to act with due regard for the safety of other vessels in the area.

The U.S. Navy, Coast Guard, Marines and Army have been conducting joint interoperability operations in the North Arabian Gulf since late March.

U.S. naval forces continue to remain vigilant and are trained to act in a professional manner, while our commanding officers retain the inherent right to act in self-defense.
HUD.gov / U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/davis_bacon_and_labor_standards...

1 of 5 1/16/2019, 12:45 PM
HUD.gov / U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/davis_bacon_and_labor_standards...

2 of 5 1/16/2019, 12:45 PM
HUD.gov / U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/davis_bacon_and_labor_standards...

3 of 5 1/16/2019, 12:45 PM
HUD.gov / U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/davis_bacon_and_labor_standards...

4 of 5 1/16/2019, 12:45 PM
HUD.gov / U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/davis_bacon_and_labor_standards...

5 of 5 1/16/2019, 12:45 PM