alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 8/13/15 

Received: August 13, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8kj1-u16d

Comments Due: August 28, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-3295

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I am 100% in favor of this rule regarding RIN 1210-AB32. Too many Americans have been 

taken advantage of for too long. Those who put hard working middle class families savings at 

risk with no accountability should be stopped. I know from experience that even some of the 

larger well known investment firms will invest a portion of your savings in entities that give no 

or low return on investment unless you direct them not too. I work for a very large company and 

was surprised after years of not paying attention, where my savings had been invested. 

Regarding those who put their financial interest before hard working people who only want 

something to fall back on when they are ready to retire, there should be accountability. If that 

involves clarifying who is operating with a conflict of interest and the term fiduciary, so be it.
#### § 821.5 Procedural rules.

In proceedings under subparts C, D, F, and I, for situations not covered by a specific Board rule, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will be followed to the extent practicable.

[78 FR 57534, Sept. 19, 2013]
From: marc michaud [mailto:marcgjamichaud@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2010 8:27 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

RIN 1210-AB33 is abhorrent! Q13 in particular on requiring the annuitization of 

retirement plans is theft! 

 

1) Basically Uncle Sam is trying to plunder retirement accounts through an annuitization 

style Ponzi scheme much like Social Security. 

 

2) IRA's, 401(k)s, and other such retirement vehicles are the direct result of government 

meddling and never should have existed in the first place. 

 

3) Government mandated retirement plans have been taken over and looted by an 

organized crime syndicate known as the Financial Industry. 

 

4) DOL, Treasury, and the entire US Federal government, are in bed with the Financial 

Industry, led by Goldman Sachs et al, and all are owned by an elite group of powerful 

individuals and families, the primary shareholders of the privately held Federal Reserve 

banks. 

 

5) Treasury is especially filled with financial terrorists whose sole purpose is to 

consolidate wealth and power into the hands of the elites. 

 

6) The United States is bankrupt by design, its imminent collapse having been 

engineered by the elite, and no amount looting and no power on earth can reverse it or 

stop it. 

 

7) RIN 1210-AB33 is designed to further steal from the American people to make them 

more submissive as the United States implodes and succumbs to a single global 

economic and monetary system enforced by a planetary government under the control 

of the elite. 

 

DOL and Treasury will find that citizens are no longer so easily fooled, are in a 

particularly foul mood, are increasingly prepared to mount fierce revolt against tyranny, 

and that RIN 1210-AB33 will provoke many more furious responses such as this. 

 

Marc Michaud 

Private Businessman 

Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Bumgardner, Frank and Humphreys 

Argued at Richmond, Virginia 

LEVI MILTON WALKER, S/K/A 

 LEVY MILTON WALKER 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION* BY 

v. Record No. 2653-99-2 JUDGE RUDOLPH BUMGARDNER, III 

 OCTOBER 10, 2000 

COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD 

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY 

Herbert C. Gill, Jr., Judge 

 Emmet D. Alexander for appellant. 

 Larry S. Hogan, Assistant Commonwealth's 

Attorney (William W. Davenport, 

Commonwealth's Attorney; B. Scott McMichael, 

Third Year Law Intern, on brief), for 

appellee. 

 

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, recodifying Code 

§ 17-116.010, this opinion is not designated for publication.

Levi Milton Walker appeals his conviction of driving under 

the influence. He contends that Chesterfield County improperly 

enacted its driving under the influence ordinance. Finding no 

error, we affirm. 

The arrest warrant charged the defendant did "drive or 

operate a motor vehicle under the influence of alcoholic 

beverages or other self administered intoxicants and/or drugs as 

described in Section 18.2-266(I), (II), (III) and/or (IV) 1950 

code of Virginia as amended." It then cited both the local 
ordinance and the state code, "13-1/18.2-266." The defendant 

pleaded not guilty but stipulated the Commonwealth's evidence 

and presented no defense evidence. The trial court convicted 

the defendant of driving under the influence in violation of 

Code § 18.2-266. 

The defendant argues the county ordinance was invalid 

because the General Assembly amended the code after the county 

adopted its ordinance. See Code § 46.2-1313. However, the 

final order clearly states the trial court convicted the 

defendant of violating Code § 18.2-266, not of violating the 

local ordinance. The order from which the defendant appeals 

does not reflect the issue he raises. We cannot consider the 

issue raised because a court speaks only through its orders. 

See Cunningham v. Smith, 205 Va. 205, 208, 135 S.E.2d 770, 773 

(1964). Accordingly, we affirm the conviction. 

Affirmed.

- 2 -
----

(2004/C 88 E/0504)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0266/04

by John McCartin (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(4 February 2004)

Subject:   Imports of poultry meat into the EU

Can the Commission state what quantities of poultry meat have been imported into the European Union in the most recent six-month period for which statistics are available, and whether a suspension of such imports would have any significant effect on the European market for meat?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(16 March 2004)

During the first six months of 2003 the imports to the EU of poultrymeat (including live poultry and poultrymeat products) amounted to 411 000 tonnes (t). The level of imports was 26 % higher than in the corresponding period of 2002.

It is estimated that in 2003 imports of poultrymeat reached the level of 800 000 tonnes, an amount equivalent to 9 % of poultrymeat and 2 % of all meat consumed in the EU, respectively.

The main suppliers of poultrymeat to the EU in 2003 were Brazil (estimated 400 000 t), Thailand (estimated 190 000 t) and the countries of Central and Eastern Europe.

The complete suspension of poultrymeat imports to the EU market can be regarded rather as a hypothetical exercise. Although it may reduce availability of poultrymeat to the EU consumers, it would do so to a lesser extent than the 9 % indicated above. That is because the lack of imports would be compensated at least partially by European poultrymeat supply and by European pigmeat. It should be kept in mind that the EU has exported around 1 000 000 tonnes of poultrymeat in 2003 and had a trade surplus of 200 000 tonnes of that meat.

Any impact of the suspension would be, proportionally, smaller, the shorter the period in which it would be applied. In addition, any reduction in availability of meat in the EU-15 after 1 May 2004 will be mitigated by greater availability of meat from the new Member States.

----
AEC-)48 681-04 Page | of 1

MAR 2 5 208

[As of: March 25, 2010
Received: March 25, 2010
Status: Posted
PUBLIC SUBMISSION [reetes: rc ecses
Comments Due: May 03, 2010
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0006
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants & Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Comment On: IRS-2010-0006-0001
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Document: IRS-2010-0006-0057
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-02028

Submitter Information

Name: Kimberly McDonough
Address:
Jamestown, RI,

General Comment

9. A significant disadvantage of the lifetime options would be in teh costs associated with the
administration of the program, particularly for small businesses.

13. Should a lifetime option be mandated? No. The complexity of defined contribution programs
already serves as a deterrent to small businesses. Furthermore, an employer's fiduciary
responsibility to a given employee would be extended, far beyond that employee's work
relationship. Employers need to provide good options for employees while there is a employer-
employee relationship. Extending that responsibility well beyond the employment period poses a
very large liabiilty to the employer and serves as an intrusion to the employee.

19. Employers do not have the skills or necessary information to adequately advise employees
about the advantages and disadvantages lifetime income. To provide this advise, the employer
would need to know details about the employee's other financial obligations and resources -
something that most employees would view as very intrusive. To provide advice without this
information could be destreuctive to the financial well-being of an individual and could pose a
legal liability to the employer if the retiree's personal circumstances change over time. Finally, I
cannot imagine that most small businesses have the requisite knowledge to provide this level of
financial planning to their employees.

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 3/25/2010
Belknap,

June, 1900.

#### Wilcox *v.*Busiel & *Tr.*

Assumpsit. Facts found by tbe court. The plaintiffs com.pose tbe Laconia Fire Department, a voluntary association, of •which the defendant was formerly a member. The city pays each member $30 a year.

In 1898, the department voted to give a ball, each member to sell tickets and return the proceeds to the treasurer. The defendant received and sold tickets, but has not accounted for the proceeds, although he promised the plaintiffs to do so. For this cause he was discharged from the department, and thereupon this suit was brought. There was due the defendant from the trustee nine months’ pay. For five and a half months the services had been performed by a substitute procured and paid by the defendant.

*Walter S. Peaslee,*for the plaintiffs.'

*Stone*& *Shannon,*for the defendant.

Peaslee, J.

If there are matters other than the collection of the .admitted debt which require further proceedings between these parties, the plaintiffs may amend by filing a bill in equity. *Brooks*v. *Howison,*63 N. H. 382.

The money earned by the substitute and now due the defendant is not exempt from attachment on trustee process, *Gray*v. *Fife, ante, p.*89.

*Case discharged.*

Blodgett, C. J., did not sit: the others concurred.
# U.S. Central Command Media Advisory Dayr az Zawr Investigation Results

/ Published Nov. 28, 2016

November 28, 2016

Release Number 20161128-35

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

****

****

**TAMPA, Fla.** ––U.S. Air Forces Central Command will release the results of the September 17 Dayr az Zawr, Syria airstrike investigation on a live, on-the-record conference call open to journalists, starting at 10 a.m. Nov. 29, 2016.

During the call, Brig. Gen. Richard "Tex" Coe, the lead investigating officer, will present the findings and recommendations. Questions from the Pentagon Press to the investigating officer will follow Brig. Gen. Coe’s extended opening statement, and Col. John J. Thomas, Central Command spokesman will moderate.

The call is scheduled to last 45 minutes. Those able to participate should dial 888-847-6592. When prompted, enter Passcode 3080897. It is recommended to dial in 15 minutes prior to the call. Each individual calling in will be asked to identify themselves and media affiliation into a recording before being automatically connected. 

Pentagon Press will gather around the call in the Press Briefing Room and be called on to ask their questions by Navy Capt. Jeff Davis who will also be in the room at the Pentagon. Time permitting, journalists outside the Pentagon will also be able to ask questions. 

-30-
----

----

I Információ

Bizottság

----

Euro átváltási árfolyamok (1)

2004. május 6.

(2004/C 131/01)

1 euro == 

----

(1)

Forrás: Az Európai Központi Bank (ECB) átváltási árfolyama.

----

III Közlemények

Bizottság

----

Felhívás ajánlattételre – INTERACT Program 2002–2006

(2004/C 131/02)

Az „INTERACT” 2002–2006 Közösségi Kezdeményezési Program vezető testülete, az Osztrák Köztársaság Szövetségi Kancelláriája a Program 2. sz. Intézkedésének 2. és 3. sz. Prioritásai alatt futó projektekre a második ajánlattételi kört ezennel meghirdeti.

Az aktuális felhívás, a Programmal kapcsolatos pályázati anyag és egyéb részletes információ letölthető az INTERACT honlapjáról az alábbi címen: www.interact-eu.net. Az INTERACT Titkárságára 2004. július 15. után beérkezett pályázatok érvénytelennek tekintendők. A pályázatokat szokásos vagy ajánlott levélben az alábbi címre küldjék el:

----

----

AZ OLVASÓHOZ

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapjának különkiadása, amely az intézmények és az Európai Központi Bank csatlakozás előtt elfogadott jogi aktusainak szövegét tartalmazza, cseh, észt, lengyel, lett, litván, magyar, máltai, szlovák és szlovén nyelven fog megjelenni. A kiadvány köteteit 2004. május 1-je és a 2004 vége között fokozatosan fogják publikálni.

Ennek megfelelően – a kötetek megjelenéséig – a szövegek elektronikus változata az EUR-Lex oldalán elérhető.

Az EUR-Lex oldalának címe: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/fr/accession.html 

----
# April 4 Red Sea Update

/ Published April 4, 2024

April 4, 2024Release Number 20240404- 01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla. –**At approximately 2:20 p.m. (Sanaa time) on April 4, U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) forces successfully engaged and destroyed one anti-ship missile (ASM) in a Houthi controlled territory of Yemen. There were no injuries or damage reported by U.S., coalition, or commercial ships.

It was determined that the missile presented a threat to U.S. and coalition forces and merchant vessels in the region. CENTCOM is dedicated to protecting the freedom of navigation and making international waters safer and more secure for Coalition and merchant vessels.
Editorial Note on Part 386
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 386 appear at 65 FR 7755, Feb. 16, 2000, and 88 FR 80182, Nov. 17, 2023.

§ 386.30 Enforcement proceedings under part 395. ( a ) *General.* A motor carrier is liable for any act or failure to act by an employee, as defined in § 390.5 of this subchapter, that violates any provision of part 395 of this subchapter if the act or failure to act is within the course of the motor carrier's operations. The fact that an employee may be liable for a violation in a proceeding under this subchapter, based on the employee's act or failure to act, does not affect the liability of the motor carrier.
( b ) *Burden of proof.* Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, the burden is on a motor carrier to prove that the employee was acting outside the scope of the motor carrier's operations when committing an act or failing to act in a manner that violates any provision of part 395 of this subchapter.
( c ) *Imputed knowledge of documents.* A motor carrier shall be deemed to have knowledge of any document in its possession and any document that is available to the motor carrier and that the motor carrier could use in ensuring compliance with part 395 of this subchapter. “Knowledge of any document” means knowledge of the fact that a document exists and the contents of the document.
[80 FR 78382, Dec. 16, 2015]
From: Debbie White [mailto:dkwhite@hughes.net] 

Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 12:01 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

I do not support the ideas proposed in RIN 1210-AB33. These rules would 

negatively impact the financial freedom of responsible citizens.

 

I don't think it's wise (for the citizens) for the federal government to take money 

from Americans’ private 401(k) retirement accounts and convert it into 

government-backed annuities. The government doesn't exactly have a great 

financial record (which, I suspect, is why they're proposing this idea in the first 

place) and generally don't really have my benefit in mind, so I don't want them 

handling any more of my money than I have to let them touch.

 

I also think it's unethically underhanded to have the item #13 "that option be the 

default distribution option." Such a thing shouldn't be a default position.

 

Sincerely,

 

Debbie White

Alpena, AR
----

(2004/C 84 E/0206)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0151/04

by Alexandros Alavanos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(27 January 2004)

Subject:   Shortage of intensive care units in Greece

There is a significant shortage of intensive care units in Greece. Under the Second Community Support Framework (CSF), measure 1.1 of the health section of the Health and Welfare Programme provides specific appropriations for the modernisation of intensive care units and the creation of new units.

Supplementary answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(5 March 2004)

The Commission can inform the honourable Member that no measure of the Health and Welfare Programme of the Second Community Support Framework (CSF) provided specific appropriations for the modernisation of intensive care units and the creation of new units.

Measure 1.1 of the said operational programme provided appropriations for:

According to information received from the Greek authorities, the most accurate information available regarding the number of intensive care units in Greece is as follows. By the end of 1993 the intensive care units of all hospitals in Greece had 789 beds. Today, the intensive care units of all hospitals in Greece have 1 360 beds. Apart from very few exceptions, all of these beds are in operation. By the end of June 2004, the intensive care units of all hospitals in Greece will have 1 466 beds.

----
----

(2004/C 84 E/0446)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0385/04

by Theresa Villiers (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(6 February 2004)

Subject:   Commercial activities of Ordnance Survey

Ordnance Survey, the UK's national mapping agency, receives significant funds from UK Government grants and in closed tender government mapping contracts. Since 1999, it has undertaken its own commercial aerial survey business. Before this date, aerial surveys had been an exclusively private sector business, and there was a well-established division of interest between Ordnance Survey (maps) and the private sector (aerial surveys). However, it has been alleged that OS is now using the money it receives from public funds in part to support its own commercial aerial survey business. The competitors of Ordnance Survey claim that their business has been severely damaged by this unfair and subsidised competition with the private sector.

Answer given by Mr Monti on behalf of the Commission

(9 March 2004)

The Commission has not been informed that Ordnance Survey receives funding from the UK authorities. It is therefore not in a position to state whether the funding to which the Honourable Member refers constitutes state aid within the meaning of the EC Treaty and, if so, whether it is compatible with the common market. Such funding could be regarded as compensation for services provided and not state aid.

If Ordnance Survey's work is regarded as a service of general economic interest, the funding would be regarded as compensation if:

The fact that Ordnance Survey has discharged public service obligations since 1999 is not in itself a breach of the competition rules. However, it may not use funding received as compensation for any public service work to subsidise purely commercial activities. Such overcompensation could, if it affected competition and trade between Member States, constitute state aid incompatible with the common market.

Commission Directive 80/723/EEC on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings (1) requires separate accounts to be kept:

Ordnance Survey could therefore be subject to an obligation to keep separate accounts if it is entrusted with the operation of a service of general economic interest.

The UK authorities have told the Commission that they have introduced the necessary legislative, regulatory and administrative measures to comply with the transparency obligations imposed by the Community directives.

----

(1)  Commission Directive 80/723/EEC of 25 June 1980, OJ L 195, 29.7.1980, as amended by Directives 85/413/EEC of 24 July 1985, OJ L 229, 28.8.1985, 93/84/EEC of 30 September 1993, OJ L 254, 12.10.1993 and 2000/52/EC of 26 July 2000, OJ L 193, 29.7.2000.

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Heritage Worldwide,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  February 10, 2005                            /s/ Claude Couty
                                                    -----------------------
                                                        Claude Couty
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                                    and General Manager
#### § 585.4 Petitions to extend period to file report.

A petition for extension of the time to submit a report required under this part shall be received not later than 15 days before the report is due. The petition shall be submitted to: Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590. The filing of a petition does not automatically extend the time for filing a report. A petition will be granted only if the petitioner shows good cause for the extension, and if the extension is consistent with the public interest.