alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brigham Exploration Company
(the"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Ben M.Brigham, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated:  November 9, 2004                /s/ BUD M. BRIGHAM
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        Bud M. Brigham
                                        Chief Executive Officer, President and
                                        Chairman of the Board


     This certification shall not be deemed to be "filed" for the purpose of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be
incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as
being incorporated therein by reference.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Brigham
Exploration Company and will be retained by Brigham Exploration Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
§ 599.301 Limitations and restrictions on qualifying transactions. ( a ) *Date of transaction.* A qualifying transaction may not occur on a date before July 1, 2009 or after November 1, 2009, and is subject to available agency funds for the CARS Program.
( b ) *One credit per transaction.* Only one credit may be applied towards the purchase or lease price of each new vehicle.
( c ) *One credit per person.* A person that participates in a transaction for which a credit is issued under the CARS Program, whether as a single owner or a joint-registered owner of either an eligible trade-in vehicle, a new vehicle, or both, may not participate or be named in another transaction for which a credit is issued under the CARS program, either as a registered owner of the trade-in vehicle or as a purchaser of the new vehicle.
( d ) *Transfer of title.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (d)(2) of this section, a dealer may not apply for or receive reimbursement for a credit extended to a purchaser under a CARS program transaction unless it has been conveyed clear title and physically possesses the title to the trade-in vehicle.
( 2 ) In the case of a trade-in vehicle registered in a State that is a non-titling jurisdiction and that, in accordance with State law, has no title, the requirement in paragraph (d)(1) of this section that clear title be conveyed is satisfied if the purchaser shows proof of registration in the purchaser's name and provides a bill of sale conferring ownership of the trade-in vehicle to the dealer.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 405

Expressing the moral requirement to end violence and terrorism in the Middle

East.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 1, 2002

Mr. OBEY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on International Relations

RESOLUTION

Expressing the moral requirement to end violence and

terrorism in the Middle East.

Whereas recent events in the Middle East, triggered by recent Palestinian suicide bombings, have created conditions under which the reestablishment of a nonviolent environment is highly unlikely without the active sustained

leadership of the United States: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) stands in solidarity with Israel’s right as a

3 frontline state in the war against terrorism to take

4 military action to end terrorist attacks, to dismantle

5 terrorist infrastructure, and to provide security for

6 its people;
2

•HRES 405 IH

1 (2) remains committed to Israel’s right to self2 defense and to assisting Israel in exercising that

3 right;

4 (3) will continue to assist Israel in strength5 ening its homeland defenses;

6 (4) condemns Palestinian suicide bombings and

7 the ongoing support and coordination of terror by

8 Yassir Arafat and other members of the Palestinian

9 leadership;

10 (5) insists that the Palestinian Authority fulfill

11 its commitment to dismantle the terrorist infrastruc12 ture in the Palestinian areas;

13 (6) urges all Arab states, particularly United

14 States allies Egypt and Saudi Arabia, to declare

15 their unqualified opposition to all forms of terrorism,

16 particularly suicide bombing, and to act in concert

17 with the United States to stop the violence;

18 (7) urges Israel to make clear, in the context of

19 the full settlement described in paragraph (8), its

20 willingness to withdraw from occupied territories;

21 and

22 (8) urges all parties in the region to vigorously

23 pursue efforts to establish a just, lasting, and com24 prehensive peace in the Middle East that will enable

25 Israel and an independent Palestinian state to exist
3

•HRES 405 IH

1 within the context of full and normal relationships,

2 which should include termination of all claims or

3 states of belligerency and respect for and acknowl4 edgment of the sovereignty, territorial integrity, and

5 political independence of every state in the area and

6 their right to live in peace within secure and recog7 nized boundaries free from threats or acts of force.

Æ
§ 599.601 Procedures for requesting exception. ( a ) *Submission.* A request for exception must be made in writing and mailed by United States mail to the NHTSA Administrator, 1200 New Jersey Ave SE., Washington, DC 20590.
( b ) *Contents.* The request must include paper copies of the following materials: ( 1 ) *Explanation of hardship.* A written explanation of a hardship identified in § 599.600(c) that prevented the dealer from submitting its transaction, and the steps the dealer took to contact the agency and timely resolve the issue;
( 2 ) *Proof of hardship.* Documents evidencing that the dealer was unable to complete and submit an application for reimbursement prior to the deadline because of hardship caused by NHTSA. Documents may include copies of correspondence with the agency;
( 3 ) *Documentation of qualifying transaction.* Paper copies of all supporting attachments required by § 599.302(c)(2) which reveal that a qualifying CARS transaction, including the transfer of ownership and possession of the trade-in vehicle to the dealer and the delivery of ownership and possession of the new vehicle to the purchaser, was made prior to August 24, 2009, 8 p.m. EDT; and
( 4 ) *Certifications.* Paper copies of all certifications provided in Appendix A to this part, signed by both the dealer and the purchaser.
( 5 ) *Evidence of prior notice to NHTSA.* Evidence, if any, that the dealer attempted to contact NHTSA prior to August 25, 2009, 8 p.m. EDT, to request assistance with a problem described in § 599.600(c).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,016
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,255
<ALLOWANCES>                                       893
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,921
<PP&E>                                          11,416
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,373
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,405
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,690
<BONDS>                                          2,704
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,176
<COMMON>                                            34
<OTHER-SE>                                      (3,496)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,405
<SALES>                                         46,063
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,063
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,618
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (761)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    96
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 172
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,034
<INCOME-TAX>                                        63
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,971
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,889
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.51
        






</TABLE>
## MEMORANDUM

**DATE:** 11/24/14 **FROM:** Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR – 2013 - 0602 **SUBJECT:** Discussion of the Clean Power Plan at the Power Plant Management and Generation

Summit
**SUMMARY :**  

### Region 4 provided information on the Clean Power Plan to participants at the Power Plant Management and Generation Summit 

### on October 27 , 2014 , in Atlanta, GA . The Clea n Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was p roposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES :**  **EPA** Ken Mitchell /EPA R4 **External Stakeholders** Jason Cox/Dynegy, Inc. Richard L. Benedict/Indianapolis Power and Light Company Matthew T. Usher/AEP Generation Approximately 50 other participants
**ATTACHMENT**
#### § 663.7 Certification of compliance to FTA.

A recipient purchasing revenue service rolling stock with funds obligated by FTA on or after October 24, 1991, must certify to FTA that it will conduct or cause to be conducted pre-award and post-delivery audits as prescribed in this part. In addition, such a recipient must maintain on file the certifications required under subparts B, C, and D of this part.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, May 1, 1995 (59), Para 59.12 Senate Bills and Joint Resolution Referred]
[Page 606]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.59.12  senate bills and joint resolution referred

  Bills and a joint resolution of the Senate of the following titles 
were taken from the Speaker's table and, under the rule, referred as 
follows:

       S. 268. An Act to authorize the collection of fees for 
     expenses for triploid grass carp certification inspections, 
     and for other purposes; to the Committee on Energy and 
     Natural Resources;
       S. 349. An Act to reauthorize appropriations for the 
     Navajo-Hopi Relocation Housing Program; to the Committee on 
     Energy and Natural Resources;
       441S. 441. An Act to reauthorize appropriations for certain 
     programs under the Indian Child Protection and Family 
     Violence Prevention Act, and for other purposes; to the 
     Committee on Energy and Natural Resources;
       S. 523. An Act to amend the Colorado River Basin Salinity 
     Control Act to authorize additional measures to carry out the 
     control of salinity upstream of Imperial Dam in a cost-
     effective manner, and for other purposes; to the Committee on 
     Energy and Natural Resources;
       S.J. Res. 32. Joint resolution expressing the concern of 
     the Congress regarding certain recent remarks that unfairly 
     and inaccurately maligned the integrity of the Nation's law 
     enforcement officers; to the Committee on the Judiciary.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5 
<CIK> 0000020469
<NAME> UNITED MAGAZINE COMPANY
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,085,118
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               49,345,319
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,500,000
<INVENTORY>                                 40,533,817
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            97,887,243
<PP&E>                                      13,509,760
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,621,238
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             271,602,726
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      144,131,415
<BONDS>                                     80,869,930
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           250
<OTHER-SE>                                  37,320,884
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               271,602,726
<SALES>                                    301,341,037
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           301,341,037
<CGS>                                      233,550,538
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               84,411,883
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,940,676
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (24,520,935)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (24,520,935)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (24,520,935)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.47)
        

</TABLE>
#### Daniel Crehange, Appellant, v. Isaac P. Powers, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Follett, J.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fisher Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Robert C. Bateman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (3) | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 8, 2004



/s/ Robert C. BatemanRobert C. BatemanSenior Vice PresidentChief Financial Officer
#### Visscher v. Andrews.

Motion to correct order denied.
**EXHIBIT
      23.01**





CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





To
      the
      Board of Directors


Colonial
      Commercial Corp.





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
      333-37025) on Form S-8 of Colonial Commercial Corp. of our report dated March
      30,
      2006 with
      respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Colonial Commercial Corp. as of
      December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
      stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2005, which
      report appears in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Colonial
      Commercial Corp.








/s/Weiser
      LLP


Weiser
      LLP





March
      30,
      2006
Appellate Department, Superior Court, Los Angeles

[Crim. A. No. 14350.

Sept. 15, 1976.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JACK EDWARD ENOCHS, Defendant and Appellant.

*1079Counsel

Jack Edward Enochs, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.

Burt Pines, City Attorney, and Ward G. McConnell, Deputy City Attorney, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Opinion

MARSHALL, P. J.

Defendant was charged with violation of section 22348, subdivision (a) of the Vehicle Code; he pleaded nolo contendere and then made an explanation, following which he asked that he be permitted to attend traffic school. Defendant contends that the court would not permit him to attend because he gave his explanation before asking for traffic school.

The trial court declared in its certified statement that the “custom” in arraignment court is to inform defendants that if they wish to attend traffic school, they must state such desire before they give any explanation of their conduct.1 According to the settled statement, if an *1080explanation is given *before*defendant requests traffic school, he will be denied the right to attend the school.  To grant or refuse a request for traffic school on such an arbitrary basis is a clear abuse of discretion by the trial court. Such discretion must be “governed by legal rules to do justice according to law.” (See *Ex Parte Hoge*(1874) 48 Cal. 3, 5 quoted with approval in *In re Podesto*(1976) 15 Cal.3d 921, 933 [127 Cal.Rptr. 97, 544 P.2d 1297].) A decision based on the order in which a defendant made his requests is not one grounded in “legal rules to do justice according to law.”

The trial judge has the power to order defendant to attend traffic school. If the trial judge believes that a defendant’s circumstances indicate that a defendant would benefit from attending school, such attendance should be authorized. The question of such imposition should not be affected by the order in which plea, explanation and request (for school) are presented. To decide on defendant’s entitlement to traffic school on the basis of the order of presentation rather than the facts of the case is capricious and arbitraiy.

The judgment is reversed.

Cole, J., and Alarcon, J., concurred.

1

incidentally, we note that the general statement of rights dated May 8, 1975, read to the defendant according to the docket, mentioned that the request for traffic school must precede the defendant’s explanation. This does not constitute notice to defendant that if he does not make his request, as indicated, he will be fined and not sent to traffic school. In any case, whether the defendant has such notice or not, the custom is arbitrary.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
          THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION
          EXTRACTED  FROM VESTCOM  INTERNATIONAL, INC.'S  FINANCIAL   STATEMENTS
          AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL 
          STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001034941
<NAME>                        VESTCOM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1   
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1
<CASH>                                         2,572,885
<SECURITIES>                                     356,277
<RECEIVABLES>                                 19,429,159
<ALLOWANCES>                                     537,826
<INVENTORY>                                    4,122,859
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              31,185,799
<PP&E>                                        27,648,131
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,930,434
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               129,678,772
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         26,521,687
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                    2,651,867
<COMMON>                                      86,782,015
<OTHER-SE>                                      (999,182)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 129,678,772
<SALES>                                       78,364,313
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              78,364,313
<CGS>                                       (49,779,001)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               (22,086,845)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (771,902)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               6,084,095
<INCOME-TAX>                                  2,968,965
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                  3,115,130
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
        

</TABLE>
#### § 577.4 Definitions.

For the purposes of this part:

*Act* means 49 U.S.C. Chapter 30101-30169.

*Administrator* means the Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration or his delegate.

*First purchaser* means the first purchaser in good faith for a purpose other than resale.

*Leased motor vehicle* means any motor vehicle that is leased to a person for a term of at least four months by a lessor who has leased five or more vehicles in the twelve months preceding the date of notification by the vehicle manufacturer of the existence of a safety-related defect or noncompliance with a Federal motor vehicle safety standard in the motor vehicle.

*Lessee* means a person who is the lessee of a leased motor vehicle as defined in this section.

*Lessor* means a person or entity that is the owner, as reflected on the vehicle's title, of any five or more leased vehicles (as defined in this section), as of the date of notification by the manufacturer of the existence of a safety-related defect or noncompliance with a Federal motor vehicle safety standard in one or more of the leased motor vehicles.

*Owners* includes purchaser.

[41 FR 56816, Dec. 30, 1976, as amended at 60 FR 17270, Apr. 5, 1995]