alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ANSF, ISAF forces in Khowst repel palace attacks
 By None  , Afghanista Ministry of Defense
   KABUL, Afghanistan (March 9, 2010) - Afghan National Security Forces and ISAF servicemembers who repelled an insurgent attack on the Khowst provincial palace yesterday afternoon displayed partnership and training responsible for security of government officials and citizens of Khowst.  "This is an example of how well ANSF and ISAF forces work together to repel insurgent attacks," said General Azimi, Ministry of Defense spokesman. "Afghan and international forces worked in concert to quickly thwart a complex attack and keep insurgents from meeting their objective." The three to five insurgents who attacked the palace with small-arms fire and rocket-propelled grenades and one suicide bomber did not breach the security perimeter. Another suicide bomber was killed by security forces while clearing the police station. The governor was not harmed in the attack. The only people killed were insurgents and no civilian injuries or damages were reported. "This attack shows the tactics of the insurgents," said Azimi. "Their campaign of threats and violence does nothing to build up the country of Afghanistan and shows they are really the enemies of the people."
#### § 807.151 Program accessibility: New construction and alterations.

Each building or part of a building that is constructed or altered by, on behalf of, or for the use of the agency shall be designed, constructed, or altered so as to be readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons. The definitions, requirements, and standards of the Architectural Barriers Act (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), as established in 41 CFR 101-19.600 to 101-19.607, apply to buildings covered by this section.
Docket: EBSA-2010-0014 

Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status as a 

Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0014-0001 

Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status as a 

Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: EBSA-2010-0014-DRAFT-0003 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: Brian Muhich 

Address: 

3 Executive Court, Suite 3 

South Barrington, IL, 

Email: brian@ipachicago.com 

Phone: 847-277-7530 

Organization: Insurance Plans Agency, Inc. 

General Comment 

Comment # 1 - 

If an insurance company forces an employer to decrease benefits on their existing group 

health/medical insurance program, which benefit decreases are more than what is allowed in this 

Rule for the employer to retain "grandfathered" plan status, does an employer have to forfeit 

grandfathered status? 

Example: ABC Company has a PPO plan through XYZ Insurance. XYZ Insurance informs ABC 

Company that on their next policy anniversary which is set for 9/1/10, ABC Company will have to 

increase their Emergency Room Copayment from $75 to $150. 

This change is greater than the allowed fixed cost share increase in this Rule, but the employer, 

ABC Company, had no choice/decision in the matter. Their insurance carrier forced them to 

decrease their benefits. 

It is my opinion that an employer should not lose "grandfathered" status because of a 

forced/mandated benefit decrease imposed by the insurance company. 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

Comment # 2 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION 

As of: July 21, 2010 

Received: June 29, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80b0ca5e 

Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 2

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 7/21/2010
Example: 

An employer offers an HMO and a PPO program through the same insurance company, MNO 

Insurance Co. If the employer makes a benefit plan change to their PPO plan that causes the PPO 

plan to lose "grandfathered" status, does the HMO plan automatically lose "grandfathered" status 

as well? In this example, assume the employer makes no plan changes at all to the HMO and 

continues offering the PPO plan as an option to their employees, but with reduced benefits on the 

PPO plan. 

Page 2 of 2

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 7/21/2010
----

Action brought on 26 February 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Italian Republic

(Case C-97/04)

(2004/C 94/63)

An action against the Italian Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 26 February 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by M. Konstantinidis and R. Amorosi, acting as Agents.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The period for transposition of the directive expired on 28 December 2002.

----

(1)OJ L 332, 28.12.2000, p. 91.

----
§ 98.9 Decision if hearing waived. ( a ) If the former employee waives or, in accordance with § 98.5(b) of this part, is deemed to have waived a hearing under this part, the examiner shall, after review of the record as it exists, make a decision as to whether the former employee is in violation of 18 U.S.C. 207.
( b ) In a decision under paragraph (a) of this section, the requirements of § 98.8 of this part apply.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 21

                    Subsidiaries of the Columbia Energy Group
                             as of December 31, 1999

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              State of
         Segment / Subsidiary                               Incorporation
         --------------------                               -------------

<S>                                                         <C>
Transmission and Storage Operations
    Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation                      Delaware
    Columbia Gulf Transmission Company                         Delaware
    Columbia Pipeline Corporation                              Delaware

Distribution Operations
    Columbia Gas of Kentucky, Inc.                             Kentucky
    Columbia Gas of Maryland, Inc.                             Delaware
    Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.                                 Ohio
    Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania, Inc.                         Pennsylvania
    Columbia Gas of Virginia, Inc.                             Virginia

Exploration and Production Operations
    Columbia Energy Resources, Inc.                            Texas

Energy Marketing Operations
    Columbia Energy Services Corporation                       Kentucky
    Columbia Propane Corporation                               Delaware

Power Generation, LNG and Other Operations
    Columbia LNG Corporation                                   Delaware
    Columbia Atlantic Trading Corporation                      Delaware
    Columbia Electric Corporation                              Delaware
    Columbia Energy Group Capital Corporation                  Delaware
    Columbia Network Services Corporation                      Delaware

Corporate
    Columbia Energy Group Service Corporation                  Delaware
    Columbia Insurance Corporation, Ltd                        Bermuda
    Columbia Finance Corporation                               Delaware

</TABLE>
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICERANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Garry L. Anselmo, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Silverado Gold Mines Ltd., (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the
      fiscal year ended November 30, 2005 (the Annual Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                   

| | By:    | /s/ Garry L. Anselmo       
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| | Name:  | Garry L. Anselmo           
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer    
| | Date:  | February 28, 2006          

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5
<LEGEND>
=======================================================================
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
company's financial statements as of and for the year ended March 31,
1999 and is  qualified  in its  entirety by  reference to such financial
statements.
=======================================================================
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                          YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                               Mar-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                                  Apr-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                    Mar-31-1999

<CASH>                                                              181,068
<SECURITIES>                                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    37,801,648
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      1,215,213
<INVENTORY>                                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                          0
<PP&E>                                                              658,342
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      476,395
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   37,292,537

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                     0
<BONDS>                                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                                               0
<COMMON>                                                         20,607,376

<OTHER-SE>                                                          650,301
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     37,292,537

<SALES>                                                           4,578,797
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  4,578,797
<CGS>                                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     89,370
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    180,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                1,139,875
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   2,538,287
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         32,461
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      2,505,826

<EPS-BASIC>                                                           .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           .36


</TABLE>
H. Res. 438

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 11, 2002.

Whereas the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service

has identified obesity as a major health problem;

Whereas 61 percent of adults in the United States are considered overweight or obese, as indicated by a body mass

index (the most reliable measure) of 25 or greater;

Whereas 300,000 deaths each year in the United States are

associated with being overweight or obese;

Whereas the economic cost of obesity in the United States

was about $177 billion in 2000;

Whereas being overweight or obese puts people at a greater

risk of heart disease, certain types of cancer, type 2 diabetes, stroke, arthritis, breathing problems, and depression;

Whereas men who are overweight are 50 percent more likely

to have erectile dysfunction and men who are obese are

200 percent more likely to have erectile dysfunction;

Whereas fewer than a third of American adults engage in the

recommended level of physical activity, which is 30 minutes, 3 to 4 times a week; and
2

•HRES 438 EH

Whereas the number of overweight and obese children has

nearly tripled in the past two decades: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) recognizes that being overweight or obese is

3 a major health concern in the United States;

4 (2) commends and supports the work of all or5 ganizations that are taking steps to combat this

6 health problem;

7 (3) urges all governmental, State, and private

8 organizations to do everything in their power to pro9 mote a healthy lifestyle; and

10 (4) pledges to take proactive steps to intensify

11 its efforts to combat this health problem.

Attest:

Clerk.
From: l59e85 [mailto:L59E85@aol.com] 

Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 8:37 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Don't touch our IRAs or 401ks

Why in God's would the government want to take control of OUR pensions. That would be 

stealing from us. PRAY WE CLEAN HOUSE IN DC BEFORE THAT HAPPENS.
----

----

I Meddelanden

Kommissionen

----

Eurons växelkurs (1)

19 maj 2004

(2004/C 140/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Källa: Referensväxelkurs offentliggjord av Europeiska centralbanken.

----

----

Förhandsanmälan av en koncentration

(ärende nr COMP/M.3436 – Continental / Phoenix)

(2004/C 140/02)

(Text av betydelse för EES)

----

(1)EGT L 395, 30.12.1989, s. 1. Rättelse i EGT L 257, 21.9.1990, s. 13.

(2)EGT L 180, 9.7.1997, s. 1. Rättelse i EGT L 40, 13.2.1998, s. 17

----

----

Förhandsanmälan av en koncentration

(ärende nr COMP/M.3355 – Apollo / JP Morgan / Primacom)

(2004/C 140/03)

(Text av betydelse för EES)

----

(1)EGT L 24, 29.1.2004, s. 1.

----
§ 9.13 Legal proceedings between private litigants: Procedures to request records. ( a ) In a legal proceeding between private litigants, a party who wishes to obtain records from the Department shall submit to agency counsel a request for the records. The request will ordinarily be handled in accordance with the Department's procedures concerning requests for records found at 49 CFR part 7. If the party does not follow the procedures specified in that part, the request must be accompanied by a statement setting forth the relevance of the records to the proceeding. The request should be resolved before any request for testimony under § 9.15 is submitted. Where a request for testimony includes a request for additional records, it shall indicate precisely how this new request differs in scope from any previous request in order to avoid agency duplication of effort. Agency counsel shall notify the requester of the approval or denial of the request.
( b ) [Reserved]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1434.html[7/23/2015 11:00:34 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvn-daaq

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1434

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Walt Walker

General Comment

Leave my retirement alone! The government is too intrusive in every area of our lives!
```

[Federal Register: April 21, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 76)]
[Notices]               
[Page 20879]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr21ap10-112]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

 
Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To Release Airport Property 
at the Eagle County Regional Airport, Eagle, CO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Request to Release Airport Property.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invite public comment on the 
release of land at the Eagle County Regional Airport under the 
provisions of section 125 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment 
Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR 21).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 21, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to 
the FAA at the following address: Mr. John P. Bauer, Manager, Federal 
Aviation Administration, Northwest Mountain Region, Airports Division, 
Denver Airports District Office, 26805 E. 68th Ave., Suite 224, Denver, 
Colorado 80249.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be 
mailed or delivered to Mr. Bryan Treu, Eagle County Attorney, P.O. Box 
850, Eagle, Colorado 81631.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Chris Schaffer, Project Manager, 
Federal Aviation Administration, Northwest Mountain Region, Airports 
Division, Denver Airports District Office, 26805 E. 68th Ave., Suite 
224, Denver, Colorado 80249.
    The request to release property may be reviewed in person at this 
same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA invites public comment on the 
request to release property at the Eagle County Regional Airport under 
the provisions of the AIR 21.
    On March 3, 2010, the FAA determined that the request to release 
property at the Eagle County Regional Airport submitted by the County 
of Eagle, Colorado met the procedural requirements of the Federal 
Aviation Regulations, Part 155. The FAA may approve the request, in 
whole or in part, no later than May 21, 2010.
    The following is a brief overview of the request:
    The County of Eagle, Colorado requests the release of 4.91 acres of 
non-aeronautical airport property of the Eagle County Regional Airport. 
The purpose of this release is to allow non-aviation-related 
development of the parcel. The sale of this parcel will provide funds 
for airport improvements.
    Any person may inspect the request by appointment at the FAA office 
listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    In addition, any person may inspect the application, notice and 
other documents germane to the application in person at the Eagle 
County Courthouse, 500 Broadway, Eagle, Colorado 81631.

    Issued in Denver, Colorado on March 30, 2010.
John P. Bauer,
Denver Airports District Office.
[FR Doc. 2010-8841 Filed 4-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
```
§ 670.21 General. In addition to actions described in §§ 670.23 through 670.29, in exercising his or her authority under this part, the Administrator may— ( a ) Require more frequent oversight of a recipient by a State Safety Oversight Agency that has jurisdiction over the recipient;
( b ) Impose requirements for more frequent reporting by a recipient;
( c ) Order a recipient to develop and carry out a corrective action plan; and
( d ) Issue restrictions and prohibitions, if through testing, inspection, investigation, audit or research carried out under Chapter 53, the Administrator determines that an unsafe condition or practice, or a combination of unsafe conditions and practices, exist such that there is a substantial risk of death or personal injury.
EXHIBIT 23.3

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Shareholders of
         CT Communications, Inc.:

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statements (Registration Nos. 33-59641,
33-59643, 33-59645, 333-15537, 333-30125, 333-38895 and 333-77323) of CT
Communications, Inc. of our reports dated February 1, 2000, with respect to
the North Carolina RSA 5 Cellular Partnership, North Carolina RSA 15
Cellular Partnership, South Carolina RSA No. 2 Cellular General
Partnership, South Carolina RSA No. 3 Cellular General Partnership, South
Carolina RSA No. 4 Cellular General Partnership, South Carolina RSA No. 5
Cellular General Partnership, South Carolina RSA No. 6 Cellular General
Partnership, South Carolina RSA No.7 Cellular General Partnership, South
Carolina RSA No. 8 Cellular General Partnership, South Carolina RSA No. 9
Cellular General Partnership, included in CT Communications' Form 10-K/A
No. 1 for the year ended December 31, 1999. Such partnership financial
statements are not included separately in CT Communications' Form 10-K/A
No. 1.

                                           /s/  ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                                           ----------------------------
                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Little Rock, Arkansas
June 27, 2000