alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 498 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 24, 2002.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill 
(H.R. 4965) to prohibit the procedure commonly known as partial-birth abortion. 
The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. The previous question shall 
be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) two hours of debate on the bill equally divided and controlled by 
the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; and 
(2) one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 178 (Friday, September 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52588-52589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4584]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


In the Matter of Terax Energy, Inc.; Order of Suspension of 
Trading

September 12, 2007.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Terax Energy, Inc. (``Terax,'' trading symbol TEXG.OB), because of 
questions regarding the accuracy of assertions by Terax and by others, 
in reports filed with the Commission and in press releases to investors 
concerning, among other things: (1) The status of Terax's oil and gas 
operations, (2) Terax's purported financing agreements, (3) Terax's 
supposed acquisition of a controlling interest in a foreign oil and gas 
firm, (4) the existence, terms and status of a purported share exchange 
agreement between Terax and Westar Oil, Inc., and (5) the identity of 
the persons in control of the operations and management of Terax.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed company.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above-listed 
company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT, September 12, 
2007 through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on September 26, 2007.


[[Page 52589]]


    By the Commission.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-4584 Filed 9-12-07; 12:00 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
CENTCOM spouses attend social media security brief
 By Sgt. Fredrick Coleman , CENTCOM Public Affairs
  Steve Selman, a member of U.S. Central Command’s Information Operations Operational Security section, explains how to reduce the risks of using forms of social media to a group of approximately 30 spouses from U.S. Central Command during a Family Social Media Awareness Brief April. 25. (USCENTCOM photo by Sgt. Fredrick J. Coleman)
 MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. – Approximately 30 spouses from U.S. Central Command gathered at the media center here to receive a Family Social Media Awareness Brief April 25.  The brief was given to provide information for spouses on how social networking can be used against them and learn ways to protect their personal information. “The brief isn’t designed to scare anyone from using their computer. It is designed to make them aware of the risks that come with it and learn about how to reduce those risks,” said Steve Selman, one of the presenters from USCENTCOM’s Information Operations Operational Security section. “We want you to become a hard target to our adversaries.” Spouses in attendance included Charlene Austin, wife of USCENTCOM Commander Gen. Lloyd J. Austin, III; Nancy Horst, wife of Maj. Gen. Karl R. Horst, USCENTCOM chief of staff; and Carla Grippe, wife of USCENTCOM Senior Enlisted Leader Command Sgt. Maj. Frank Grippe.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12163]

The Department of State's Advisory Committee on Private International Law (ACPIL) will hold a virtual meeting to discuss the Hague Special Commission on the Eighth Meeting of the Practical Operation on the 1980 Child Abduction Convention on September 12, 2023. The meeting will be held in WebEx. The program is scheduled to run from 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time.

                    The meeting will discuss the reports and documents completed concerning the Practical Operations of the 1980 Child Abduction Convention and 1996 Child Protection Convention regarding the feasibility of one or more private international law instruments. The purpose of the public meeting is to obtain the views of concerned stakeholders on the matters presented in the relevant documents, which will be made available by the HCCH at                     *https://www.hcch.net/​en/​publications-and-studies/​details4/​?pid=​8488&​dtid=​57.*

                    Members of the public may attend this virtual session and will be permitted to participate in the discussion. Virtual attendance is limited to 100 persons, so each member of the public that wishes to attend this session must provide: Name, contact information, and affiliation to                     *pil@state.gov,*                     not later than September 8, 2023. When you register, please indicate whether you require captioning. The WebEx site and agenda will be forwarded to individuals who register. Requests made after that date will be considered but might not be able to be fulfilled.                

Karin Kizer,

Attorney-Adviser, Office of Private International Law, Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2023-18510 Filed 8-25-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
304(m) CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

OW-2008-0517

DCN 10030 

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
##### 



Exhibit 10.1
 WEBMETHODS, INC.
2006 OMNIBUS STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT
 
 Grant
 Vesting Generally
 Vesting Following Change of Control




---



##### 



Stock Certificates and Restrictions
   Corporate Event
 Taxation
 - 2 -




---



##### 



Withholding Taxes
 Construction of Employee
 Entire Agreement; Amendment provided however
 Terms and Conditions of Plan
 Choice of Law
 Successors and Assigns
 Employment of Employee
 Invalid or Unenforceable Provisions
 - 3 -




---



##### 



Notices
 Further Assurances
 Headings
  - 4 -




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 WEBMETHODS, INC.By:Name:Title:EMPLOYEE
 - 5 -
From: Christopher Recker [mailto:carecker@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 6:08 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

To: Department of Labor 

 

With respect to mandatory annuitization of IRA's and 401(k)'s, I would say that this 

requirement would be tantamount to theft and a violation of the Constitution, Natural 

Law and an valid moral principle. This appears to be nothing but a plan to force feed the 

purchase of debt to finance endless government spending while inflation destroys all 

purchasing power of the life savings of all retirees forced to participate in this ludicrous 

scheme. The timing of this policy proposal is suspicious. After the longest bull market 

in bonds, the doubling of the monetary base, continued plans to monetize all classes of 

debts through nefarious methods, and proposed deficits that would risk hyperinflation, 

the government plans to mandate the purchase of securities that may have the most 

downside directly proportional to government fiscal and monetary irresponsibility. 

 

If this immoral and unconstitutional act denying Americans of their freedom and property 

were to be enforced via further denials of freedom, Americans ought to consider 

revolution against the powers that be. God willing that revolution will not be bloody. 

 

Fiercely loyal to the U.S. Constitution, 

Chris Recker
# Oct. 30: Military airstrikes continue against ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published Oct. 30, 2015

October 30, 2015Release # 20151030-01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

SOUTHWEST ASIA — On Oct. 29, coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq. In Syria, coalition military forces conducted one strike using fighter aircraft. Separately in Iraq, coalition military forces conducted 11 strikes coordinated with and in support of the Government of Iraq using bomber, fighter, and attack aircraft against ISIL targets.

The following is a summary of the strikes conducted against ISIL since the last press release:

Syria

* Near Mar'a, one strike destroyed an ISIL mortar system.

Iraq
* Near Bayji, one strike suppressed three ISIL fighting positions.

* Near Mosul, one strike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL fighting position.

* Near Ramadi, two strikes suppressed an ISIL mortar position and denied ISIL access to terrain.

* Near Sinjar, four strikes destroyed seven ISIL fighting positions, seven ISIL bed down locations, 15 ISIL assembly areas, an ISIL command and control node, three ISIL caches, and four ISIL staging areas.

* Near Tal Afar, three strikes destroyed 11 ISIL fighting positions and three ISIL assembly areas.

Strike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely. 

The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria, and the wider international community.

The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have conducted strikes in Iraq include Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, Netherlands, United Kingdom, and the United States. Coalition nations which have conducted strikes in Syria include Australia, Bahrain, Canada, France, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and the U.S.
§ 98.8 Decision by examiner. ( a ) In a hearing under § 98.7 of this part, the Departmental counsel must establish a violation by a preponderance of the evidence.
( b ) The examiner shall make a decision exclusively on matters of record in the proceeding and shall set forth in the decision: ( 1 ) All findings of fact relevant to the matters at issue;
( 2 ) All conclusions of law relevant to the matters at issue; and
( 3 ) The sanction to be imposed, if any.
Office of Planning, Environment, & Realty (HEP)Environment

GuidancePublicationsAwardsEventsContacts

      - Air Toxics
      - CMAQ
      - Conformity

      - Laws
      - Reference Material
      - Research
      - Publications
      - Training
      - Models & Methodologies 
      - Site Map

Contacts

For more information, please contact Victoria Martinez.

FHWA→Environment→Air Quality→Publications

# Transportation Air Quality Facts and Figures January 2006

U.S. Department of TransportationFederal Highway AdministrationOffice of Natural and Human Environment400 7th Street, S.W., Room 3240Washington, D.C. 20590(202)366-6724www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/air_quality/cmaq/

Publication No. FHWA-HEP-05-045HEP/12-05(8M)E

**Table of Contents**

**U.S. Department of TransportationFederal Highway Administration**

HEP HomePlanningEnvironmentRealty

FHWA HomeFeedbackPrivacy Notice

**Federal Highway Administration**
#### § 604.41 Standard of proof.

The PO shall issue a recommended decision or shall rule in a party's favor only if the decision or ruling is supported by a preponderance of the evidence.
August 13, 2010 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO–9991–IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244–1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Below are my comments regarding the Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health 

Insurance Coverage Relating to Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient 

Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). 

I believe that every effort should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by 

PPACA, especially as of January 1, 2014 when most of the reform components (Insurance 

Exchanges, Subsidies, Tax Credits, etc.) come into play. 

 

The average consumer has a broad definition of “benefits.” Consumers view their health plan 

beyond the covered benefits, cost sharing, and the contribution levels associated with the plan. 

It is my opinion that the Rule may still result in some confusion to the marketplace in its 

application. For example, if an employer raised the copayment level beyond the maximum in one 

area (i.e. outpatient services) but retained the copayment level for primary care doctor visits, 

does that mean a loss of grandfather status? Clarity will be critical both for the employer and the 

employee. 

Even by the most optimistic estimates, a substantial portion of the employee population will 

remain outside the PPACA as of January 2014 based on the current rules. While I understand the 

difficulty involved in making change, creating another large sub-population of excluded 

individuals will only add to costs, increase confusion, and mitigate the potential impact of the 

legislation. 

The Rule needs to be clear, reasonable, and with no ambiguities involved in determining whether 

a group health plan is “in or out.” The decisions the federal government makes today will 

determine the outcomes for tomorrow. We may need to make some difficult decisions to create 

a sustainable health care system that will support a growing economy in the future. That means 

getting as many citizens across the country participating at the beginning to make it work and 

delivering on its promises to retain their support. 

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this regulation. 

Sincerely, 

Paul J. Osterbauer, D.C., M.P.H.
#### Harry Fischel, Respondent, *v.*Louis Lese, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.

*Fischel*v. *Lese,*135 App. Div. 921, affirmed.

(Argued April 5, 1911;

decided April 25, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 28, 1909, affirming a judgment 'in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to foreclose a mortgage.

*John D. Connolly, Jr.,*for appellant.

*J. A. Seidman*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fisher Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q/A), I David D. Hillard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (3) |  | The Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: September 12, 2003



/s/    DAVID D. HILLARDDavid D. HillardSenior Vice President Chief Financial Officer
Motion Granted; Reversed and Rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed January 

24, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-10-01018-CV

____________

STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, Appellant

V.

SUGAR LAND—SETTLERS WAY/PONDEROSA, LTD., Appellee

On Appeal from the 61st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2008-40783

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from judgment signed August 9, 2010. On January 17, 2012, the 

parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal because they have reached an agreement to 

settle and compromise their differences in the underlying suit. The parties ask this court 

to reverse the judgment of the court below and render judgment effectuating the parties’ 

agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). We grant the motion.
2

Accordingly, the judgment of the court below is reversed and we render judgment 

that Sugar Land—Settlers Way/Ponderosa, Ltd. take nothing of and from Stewart Title 

Guaranty Company. 

We order the supersedeas bond number 22 030 020, posted on August 13, 2010, by 

Stewart Title Guaranty Company, as Principal, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, as 

Surety, in the amount of $2,971,783.00, released, and the surety, Liberty Mutual Insurance 

Company, is released from its obligations under the bond. Costs on appeal are taxed 

against the party incurring the same.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Seymore and Christopher.
IV

House Calendar No. 63

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 213

[Report No. 107–171]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2647) making appropriations

for the Legislative Branch for the fiscal year ending September 30,

2002, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 30, 2001

Ms. PRYCE, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2647) making

appropriations for the Legislative Branch for the fiscal

year ending September 30, 2002, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of

3 rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 2647) making appropriations for

6 the Legislative Branch for the fiscal year ending Sep7 tember 30, 2002, and for other purposes. The first reading
2

HRES 213 RH

1 of the bill shall be dispensed with. Points of order against

2 consideration of the bill for failure to comply with clause

3 4(c) of rule XIII are waived. General debate shall be con4 fined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally di5 vided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minor6 ity member of the Committee on Appropriations. After

7 general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment

8 under the five-minute rule. The bill shall be considered

9 as read. Points of order against provisions in the bill for

10 failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived.

11 No amendment to the bill shall be in order except those

12 printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accom13 panying this resolution. Each such amendment may be of14 fered only in the order printed in the report, may be of15 fered only by a Member designated in the report, shall

16 be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time spec17 ified in the report equally divided and controlled by the

18 proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amend19 ment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division

20 of the question in the House or in the Committee of the

21 Whole. All points of order against such amendments are

22 waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for

23 amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill

24 to the House with such amendments as may have been

25 adopted. The previous question shall be considered as or-
3

HRES 213 RH

1 dered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage

2 without intervening motion except one motion to recommit

3 with or without instructions.
House Calendar No. 63

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 213

[Report No. 107–171]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2647)

making appropriations for the Legislative Branchfor the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002,and for other purposes.

JULY 30, 2001

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed