alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 462 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 27, 2002.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 5011) making appropriations for military construction, family 
housing, and base realignment and closure for the Department of Defense for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 2003, and for other purposes. The first reading 
of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration 
of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall 
not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the 
bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. Points of 
order against provisions of the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule 
XXI are waived. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of 
the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of 
whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the 
portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of 
rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. At the conclusion 
of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report 
the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments 
thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to 
recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2. House Resolution 421 is laid on the table.
    Sec. 3. That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill (S. 
2578) to amend title 31 of the United States Code to Increase the public debt 
limit. The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. The previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening 
motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill equally divided and controlled 
by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; 
and (2) one motion to commit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Heritage Worldwide,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  May 20, 2008                  /s/ Claude Couty
                                     ----------------
                                     Claude Couty
                                     Chief Financial Officer and General Manager
2111 Wilson Boulevorcl, Sulle 500 

Arllnglon. VA 22201. USA 

\'IwVI.ohrlnet.org 

PH 703.524.8800 

FX 703.528.3816 

/!LlDI 

,.. .... ond Air-Condition Refrigerotion ing, Heo~:t Ins: ute ln , __ ",;;;;;;;;;;;;,---..;;;;;;;;;';;;;;;;;;;iiiiii~ 

August 12, 2011 

Memorandum Memorializing Ex Parte Communication 

TO: expartecommunications@hg.doe.gov (sent via email) 

On August 9,2011, the Air-Conditioning, Heating and Refrigeration Institute's (AHRI) Unitary Small 

Engineering Committee, Compressors and Condensing Units Engineering Committee and Ductless 

Equipment Engineering Committee held a joint meeting to discuss the proposed standby power (offmode) efficiency standards contained in the June 27, 2011 Direct Final Rule (76 Fed. Reg. 37,408) 

(Docket Number EERE-2011-BT-STD-OOll / Regulatory Information Number (RIN) 1904-AC06). DOE 

staff participated in this meeting in order to identify data needs for their analysis, and to answer 

questions related to the associated test procedure rulemaking. 

Meeting attendees included the following: 

Representing DOE: 

Ashley Armstrong 

John Cymbalsky 

Representing AHRI: 

David Calabrese 

Lon Lemmond 

Aniruddh Roy 

Frank Stanonik 

Members of the AHRI Unitary Small Engineering Cmte. 

Ci m;~ 

David B. Calabrese 

Senior Vice President, Policy
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 49

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the President

should award the Presidential Medal of Freedom posthumously to Dr.

Benjamin Elijah Mays in honor of his distinguished career as an educator, civil and human rights leader, and public theologian.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 14, 2001

Mr. LEWIS of Georgia (for himself, Mr. BISHOP, Mr. ISAKSON, and Ms.

MCKINNEY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

the President should award the Presidential Medal of

Freedom posthumously to Dr. Benjamin Elijah Mays

in honor of his distinguished career as an educator,

civil and human rights leader, and public theologian.

Whereas Dr. Benjamin Elijah Mays, throughout his distinguished career of more than half a century as an educator, civil and human rights leader, and public theologian,

inspired people of all races throughout the world by his

persistent commitment to excellence;

Whereas Benjamin Mays persevered, despite the frustrations

inherent in segregation, to begin an illustrious career in

education;
2

•HRES 49 IH

Whereas as Dean of the School of Religion of Howard University and later for a period of 27 years as President of

Morehouse College in Atlanta, Georgia, Benjamin Mays

overcame seemingly insurmountable obstacles to offer

high quality education to all people of the United States,

especially African-Americans;

Whereas at the commencement of World War II, when most

colleges suffered from a lack of available students and

the demise of Morehouse College appeared imminent,

Benjamin Mays prevented the college from permanently

closing its doors by vigorously recruiting potential students and thereby aiding the development of future generations of African-American leaders;

Whereas Benjamin Mays was instrumental in the elimination

of segregated public facilities in Atlanta, Georgia, and

promoted the cause of nonviolence through peaceful student protests during a time in this Nation that was often

marred by racial violence;

Whereas Benjamin Mays received numerous accolades

throughout his career, including the naming of a street

and of 7 schools and academic buildings in his honor;

and

Whereas the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the highest civilian honor in the Nation, was established in 1945 to appropriately recognize persons who have made an especially meritorious contribution to the security or national

interests of the United States, to world peace, or to cultural or other significant public or private endeavors:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the President should award the Presi-
3

•HRES 49 IH

1 dential Medal of Freedom posthumously to Dr. Benjamin

2 Elijah Mays in honor of his distinguished career as an ed3 ucator, civil and human rights leader, and public theolo4 gian and his many contributions to the improvement of

5 United States society and the world.

Æ
§ 845.21 Symposiums, forums, and conferences. ( a ) ( 1 ) *Definitions.* ( i ) A symposium is a public proceeding focused on a specific topic, where invited participants provide presentations of their research, views or expertise on the topic and are available for questions.
( ii ) A forum is a public proceeding generally organized in a question-and-answer format with various invited participants who may make presentation and are available for questioning by the Board or designated NTSB staff as individuals in a panel format.
( iii ) A conference is a large, organized proceeding where individuals present materials, and a moderator or chairperson facilitates group discussions.
( 2 ) These proceedings are related to transportation safety matters and will be convened for the purpose of focusing attention, raising awareness, encouraging dialogue, educating the NTSB, or generally advancing or developing safety recommendations. The goals of the proceeding will be clearly articulated and outlined, and will be consistent with the mission of the NTSB.
( b ) A quorum of Board Members is not required to attend a forum, symposium, or conference. All three types of proceedings described in paragraph (a) of this section may have a relationship to previous or ongoing investigative activities; however, their purpose is not to obtain evidence for a specific investigation.
( c ) Symposiums, forums, and conferences are voluntary for all invited participants.
Michael A. McKuin

Attorney at Law

P.O. Box 10577 Email: mike@mckuinlaw.com

PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92255-0577 Web Site: mckuinlaw.com

Telephone (760) 565-7598

FAX: (760) 406-4279 

Cell: (909) 831-7566 

October 27, 2017 

Office of Regulations and Interpretations, 

Employee Benefits Security Administration 

Room M-5655 

U.S. Dept. of Labor 

200 Constitution Avenue NW 

Washington D.C. 20210 

VIA E-MAIL: e-ORI@dol.gov 

Re: Claims Procedure Regulations for Plans Providing Disability Benefits Examination 

RIN No.: 1210-AB39 

Regulation: 29 C.F.R. §2560.503-1 

Dear Deputy Assistant Secretary Hauser,

I have been in private practice for more than 30 years. For a brief time prior to starting my own 

practice, I was in-house counsel for an ERISA plan administrator. I have drafted ERISA plan documents, 

including: comprehensive plan descriptions; summary plan descriptions; administrative services 

agreements; and claims manuals. For more than 20 years, my practice has been almost exclusively 

limited to handling long term disability and health claim disputes, litigation and appeals governed by 

ERISA, as well as ERISA benefit collections for healthcare providers and “in-network” provider disputes 

(e.g. HMO, PPO contract reimbursement). I have handled literally hundreds of benefit claims through all 

levels of administrative review, arbitration, litigation in federal court and before the Ninth Circuit Court 

of Appeals. My Peer Review Rating from Martindale-Hubbell is AV® PreeminentTM, the highest rating 

achievable and I have held that rating for more than 15 years. 

I am requesting that the Secretary of Labor not delay the effective date of the final ERISA claims 

regulations adopted on December 19, 2016. Those who are now objecting to the timely implementation of 

the regulations are entities that I am intimately familiar with, ERISA plans and insurers. If there is one

tactic that those parties have proven themselves to be very adept at it’s that of delay. It also appears that 

they are seeking to undo the regulations and undermine the rule-making process, after the fact. 

Sincerely,

Michael A. McKuin

MM/

Practice limited to ERISA benefit claims, litigation & appeals
#### In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Account of ISAAC F. BROWN, as Executor, etc., of DEBORAH ORSOR, Deceased.

*Will*— probate *of*— when *both witnesses must be examined*— *a witness who must be examined cannot take anything under the will*— 2 *B. 8. {Bdm. ed.),*65, *sec.*50 — *tiie rule is not changed by the subsequent legislation as to the examination of interested witnesses.*

Appeal from a decree of the surrogate of Westchester county, judicially settling the accounts of the executor of Deborah Orsor, deceased.

Deborah Orsor, by her last will and testament, gave her residuary estate to Isaac F. Brown and Margaret Miller. The same persons were made executors. There were two witnesses to the will, Isaac F. Brown and Daniel B. Foster; both lived in this State, and both were examined upon the proof of the will, and there were but these two witnesses to the will. The statute upon the subject is as follows: “ If any person shall be a subscribing witness to the execution of any will wherein any beneficial devise, legacy, interest or appointment of any real or personal estate shall be made to such witness, and such will cannot be proved without the testimony of such witness, the said devise, legacy, interest or appointment shall be void so far only as concerns such witness, or any claiming under him ; and such person shall be a competent witness and compellable to testify respecting the execution of the said will in like manner as if no such devise or bequest had been made.” (2 R. S. [Edm.]: 65, § 50.)

The court at General Term said: *“*The will could not be proven without the testimony of Brown. Two witnesses at least are, required to a will. This probate required both witnesses to be produced and examined. Two at least of the witnesses to such will,.if so many are living in this State, and of sound mind, and are not disabled from age, sickness dr infirmity from attending, shall be produced and examined. (4 R. S. [Edm.] 488, § 10.) As to Brown, the legacy was void. A surrogate may believe one witness and not the other, and thus it is claimed that a will can be proven without two witnesses in fact. The statute does not mean this. A *167will must have two witnesses, and both must be sworn to prove it, with certain exceptions,. which do not include the present case. The testimony of the witness, of necessity, must be given; the will cannot be proven without it, and the legacy consequently is void. The subsequent legislation in reference to the examination of inters ested witnesses does not repeal by implication these statutes. Such repeals are not favored, and there is no inconsistency in both statutes standing together.

“ The surrogate’s decree should be affirmed, with costs against the appellant.”

*Francis*Larkin, for Isaac F. Brown, executor, appellant.

*Charles M\*Rail, for Mary Dubois and others, respondents.

Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

Dtkman and Pratt, JJ., concurred.

Decree of surrogate,affirmed, with costs against the appellant.
§ 232.215 Transfer train brake tests. ( a ) A transfer train, as defined in § 232.5, shall receive a brake test performed by a qualified person, as defined in § 232.5, that includes the following: ( 1 ) The air brake hoses shall be coupled between all freight cars;
( 2 ) After the brake system is charged to not less than 60 psi as indicated by an accurate gauge or end-of-train device at the rear of the train, a 15-psi service brake pipe reduction shall be made; and
( 3 ) An inspection shall be made to determine that the brakes on each car apply and remain applied until the release is initiated by the controlling locomotive. A car found with brakes that fail to apply or remain applied may be retested and remain in the train if the retest is conducted as prescribed in § 232.205(c)(4); otherwise, the defective equipment may be moved only pursuant to the provisions contained in § 232.15, if applicable;
( b ) Cars added to transfer trains en route shall be inspected pursuant to the requirements contained in paragraph (a) of this section at the location where the cars are added to the train.
( c ) If a train's movement will exceed 20 miles or is not a transfer train as defined in § 232.5, the train shall receive a Class I brake test in accordance with § 232.205 prior to departure.
[66 FR 4193, Jan. 17, 2001, as amended at 67 FR 17583, Apr. 10, 2002]
#### § 570.1 Scope.

This part specifies standards and procedures for inspection of hydraulic service brake systems, steering and suspension systems, and tire and wheel assemblies of motor vehicles in use.
#### § 605.17 Certification in lieu of notice.

If there are no private school bus operators operating in the applicant's urban area, the applicant may so certify in its application in lieu of meeting the requirements of § 605.16. This certification shall be accompanied by a statement that the applicant has published, in a newspaper of general circulation in its urban area, a notice stating that it has applied for assistance as provided under § 605.16(b) and that it has certified that there are no private school bus operators operating in its urban area. A copy of the notice as published shall be included.
----

(2004/C 88 E/0152)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3402/03

by Anna Karamanou (PSE) to the Commission

(11 November 2003)

Subject:   ‘Cross amputation’ of sixteen-year-old in Sudan

A recent Amnesty International bulletin reports that a court in Sudan has imposed a sentence of ‘cross amputation’ (i.e. amputation of the right hand and the left foot) on a sixteen-year-old suspected of armed assault. If this judgment is upheld, it will be carried out forthwith.

The punishment of amputation is in essence torture and a brutal violation of human rights, while Sudan has ratified numerous conventions protecting human rights and condemning torture. Such sentences are not uncommon in a country in which the judicial system and the penal code have also incorporated provisions of Islamic law (Sharia).

What steps will the Commission take to exert pressure on the Sudanese Government to suspend the judgment concerned and abolish torture so that Sudan complies with the conventions on the protection of human rights to which that country is a signatory?

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(10 December 2003)

The application of corporal punishment has been subject to repeated interventions with the Government of Sudan, in the framework of the EU-Sudan political dialogue, which includes human rights as one of the main components. The reaction of the Government in Khartoum has usually been elusive, pointing out that Sharia is and will be the legal basis in Sudan. This has also been confirmed, at least for the northern and central part of the country, in the Machakos Protocol of July 2002, an important milestone in the peace process, which the Union generally supports.

The Commission will ask its Delegation in Khartoum to inquire about the circumstances and details of the case referred to by Amnesty International, and bring the case to the attention of the Union Troika with a view to raising it during the forthcoming high-level mission to Khartoum in December 2003.

----
USNS Choctaw County Arrives in Lebanon for First-Ever Central Partnership Station USNS Choctaw County Arrives in Lebanon for First-Ever Central Partnership Station
 
  By U.S. Naval Forces Central Command Public Affairs
  The CPS mission in Lebanon is designed to build partner capacity through subject-matter-expert exchanges, enhancing interoperability and the military-to-military relationship between the U.S. Navy and Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF). “This is a new opportunity for the U.S. Navy to work with our Lebanese counterparts,” said Vice Adm. Brad Cooper, commander of NAVCENT, U.S. 5th Fleet, and Combined Maritime Forces. “We are ushering in a new era of strengthening and expanding capacity building across the region.” The mission includes a series of subject-matter-expert exchanges between LAF and NAVCENT personnel on mine countermeasures, disaster response, public health and construction capabilities. U.S. forces working alongside their LAF counterparts include the Choctaw County, explosive ordnance disposal technicians and Navy divers, a medical and health engagement team and a Seabee construction battalion. Seabees are constructing a maritime security support facility with LAF engineers. The U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations encompasses nearly 2.5 million square miles of water area and includes the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, Red Sea and parts of the Indian Ocean. The region is comprised of 21 countries and includes three critical choke points at the Strait of Hormuz, the Suez Canal and the Strait of Bab-al-Mandeb at the southern tip of Yemen.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 9/21/15 

Received: September 21, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8l95-jo43

Comments Due: September 24, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule- Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-5312

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Tim Lysaght

Address: 

425 Walnut Street

Suite 2260

Cincinnati, OH, 45202

Email: tim.lysaght@eukleswm.com

Phone: 5139774784

General Comment

1. Any regulation based on the premise that all practitioners are not acting in the best interest of 

their clients is inherently flawed. 

2. Any sponsor of proposals like the one the DOL is submitting who believes that the proposed 

regulation will eliminate abuses is not dealing in reality. The DOL's efforts would be better 

directed at disclosure and enforcement. 

3. The regulation of commerce, including financial commerce, should be left to the Department 

of Commerce and not be the result of some bureaucrats contrived notion of duty. 

4. The imposition of regulation on a consumer's preference for a service model, post retirement, 

would appear to place the DOL's position ahead of the consumers. Professionals in our industry 

embrace disclosure and suitability and would welcome guidance in that regard. Beyond that, the 

DOL should refrain from rule making that would deny a consumer his or her choice of provider. 

Based on my 30 years of service in the industry I can testify to the fact that consumers need 

financial advice now more than ever. The retirement crisis in this county is desperate. We must 
take great care in understanding the consequences of regulations like those in the DOL proposal. 

As currently proposed it will be very debilitating to the people it is intended to serve.
From: Spinello, Glenn R. [mailto:Glenn.Spinello@ParenteBeard.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 8:43 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule

We are strongly opposed to this change and believe that there might be unintended

consequences in the market.

Glenn R. Spinello 

Principal, Valuation and Litigation Consulting 

ParenteBeard LLC 

221 West Philadelphia Street | Suite 200 | York, PA 17401-2993 

T: 717.846.7000 | F: 717.843.1731| C: 717.818.1708 

E: Glenn.Spinello@ParenteBeard.com

Website: www.ParenteBeard.com

An Independent Member of Baker Tilly International

IMPORTANT: This email and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and contain 

information that may be confidential and/or legally privileged. If you have received this email in error, please 

notify the sender by reply email and delete the message. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this 

communication by someone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. 

Any tax advice contained in this communication, unless expressly stated otherwise, was not intended or written 

to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties that may be imposed on the 

taxpayer under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law or (ii) promoting, marketing or 

recommending to another party any tax-related matter(s) addressed herein."
# December 31: Military airstrikes continue against ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published Dec. 31, 2016
20161231-01**SOUTHWEST ASIA —**** Syria**** Iraq**