alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

(2004/C 84 E/0282)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3473/03

by Daniel Cohn-Bendit (Verts/ALE) to the Council

(17 November 2003)

Subject:   Statements made by the Presidency at the EU-Russia Summit of 7 November 2003

The Joint Statement of 31 May 2003 issued at the EU-Russia Summit in St Petersburg expressed the hope that ‘the recently started political process as well as the economic and social reconstruction will lead to the restoration of the rule of law, thus promoting the protection of human rights, and to a genuine reconciliation in Chechnya’.

The Declaration of 8 October 2003 made by the Presidency on behalf of the European Union on the presidential elections in Chechnya stated that ‘the EU had already noted negative developments as, inter alia, the lack of real pluralism of candidatures to the presidency and the absence of independent media’ and that ‘considering these developments, the EU expresses serious concerns regarding the conditions in which these elections were held.’

In the same Declaration the Presidency said ‘the EU once again would like to express its hope that commitments will be followed by their implementation and that an immediate, significant improvement of the human rights situation in Chechnya will bridge the divide between the authorities and the population. The EU urges the Russian authorities to do their utmost to advance a genuine political process and to intensify its cooperation with international organisations, and in particular with OSCE, as agreed in the EU-Russia Joint Statement at St. Petersburg.’

Can the Council say what new facts the Presidency has in its possession that allowed Mr Berlusconi to claim that the problems linked to Chechnya can be considered as ‘tales’ put about by the international press?

Joint answer to Written Questions P-3415/03 and P-3473/03

(9 March 2004)

The Council underlines that it is not for the Council to comment on the declaration quoted at the end of the question.

Regarding the situation in Chechnya, it was discussed in detail during the EU-Russia summit in Rome on 6 November 2003. The absence of a reference to Chechnya in the joint statement from the summit reflected the persistent disagreement between the EU and Russia on the situation there. The EU in particular regretted and rejected the linkage made by Russia between the situation in Chechnya and the situation of the Russian minorities in the Baltic states. The agreed Council position, as quoted in the question, has therefore not changed as a result of the summit.

----
Editorial Note on Part 391
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 391 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 391.63 Multiple-employer drivers. ( a ) If a motor carrier employs a person as a multiple-employer driver (as defined in § 390.5 of this subchapter), the motor carrier shall comply with all requirements of this part, except that the motor carrier need not— ( 1 ) Require the person to furnish an application for employment in accordance with § 391.21;
( 2 ) Make the investigations and inquiries specified in § 391.23 with respect to that person;
( 3 ) Perform the annual driving record inquiry required by § 391.25(a); or
( 4 ) Perform the annual review of the person's driving record required by § 391.25(b).
( b ) Before a motor carrier permits a multiple-employer driver to drive a commercial motor vehicle, the motor carrier must obtain the driver's name, the driver's social security number, and the identification number, type, and issuing driver's licensing authority of the driver's commercial motor vehicle operator's license. The motor carrier must maintain this information for three years after employment of the multiple-employer driver ceases.
[63 FR 33278, June 18, 1998, as amended at 79 FR 59457, Oct. 2, 2014; 87 FR 13209, Mar. 9, 2022]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7242

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee,

v. ALEX BRADLEY, JR., Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (4:04-cr-00088-RAJ-FBS-2; 4:07-cv-00120-RAJ)

Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 22, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alex Bradley, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Richard Murphy, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Alex Bradley, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2008) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bradley has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 128676 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, JOSEPH M. MAUER, P ersonal Representative Justices for the Estate of KR ISTIANA LEIGH MAUER, Deceased, JOSEPH M. MA UER, Individually, JOSEPH M. MAUER, as Next Friend of CARL MAUER, a minor, MINDE M. MAUER, and CORY MAUER, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 128676 COA: 250858 Manistee CC: 02-010971-NI ROBERT WAYNE TOPPING, Defendant,

and

BOARD OF COUNTY ROAD COMMISSIONERS OF MANISTEE COUNTY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the April 7, 2005 judgment of the Court of App eals is considered and, it app earing to this Court that the
case of Middleton v County of Marquette (Docket No. 128677) is pending on appeal
before this Court and that th e decision in that case may res olve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that th e application be held in ABEYANCE pending the d ecision in that case.

d1221 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 28, 2005

Clerk
----

(2004/C 88 E/0672)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3920/03

by Graham Watson (ELDR) to the Commission

(17 December 2003)

Subject:   ECHO

In the light of representations from journalists, will the Commission consider changing its policy so that it would allow journalists to fly on ECHO flights to Mogadishu, Somalia?

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(30 January 2004)

The Commission is aware of the arguments put forward by Mr Alberizzi, a correspondent of Corrierre della Sera, who requested that ECHO Flight should be made available to provide transport to journalists wishing to travel to Somalia.

As already expressed in its reply to Mr Alberizzi's open letter (1), the Commission is not in a position to revise its policy on the use of ECHO Flight. ECHO Flight is a humanitarian service supporting humanitarian and rehabilitation projects in Somalia, Northern Kenya and the Democratic Republic of Congo by transporting staff and cargo required for the implementation of these projects. Given its humanitarian character, and in order to maintain access to conflict zones, it is of outmost importance that ECHO Flight demonstrates at all times neutrality and impartiality. Any association with political messages the missions of politicians, political officials and also journalists may produce, risks putting these basic principles in jeopardy.

For these reasons, a restrictive policy on the use of ECHO Flight needs to be adhered to.

----

(1)  http://europa.eu.int/comm/echo/pdf_files/letter_echo_flight.pdf

----
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSoil, Groundwater, Surface Water, and Sediments of Kennedy Space Center, Florida: Background Chemical and Physical CharacteristicsThis study documented background chemical composition of soils, groundwater, surface; water, and sediments of Kennedy Space Center. Two hundred soil samples were collected, 20 each in 10 soil classes. Fifty-one groundwater wells were installed in 4 subaquifers of the Surficial Aquifer and sampled; there were 24 shallow, 16 intermediate, and 11 deep wells. Forty surface water and sediment samples were collected in major watershed basins. All samples were away from sites of known contamination. Samples were analyzed for organochlorine pesticides, aroclors, chlorinated herbicides, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), total metals, and other parameters. All aroclors (6) were below detection in all media. Some organochlorine pesticides were detected at very low frequencies in soil, sediment, and surface water. Chlorinated herbicides were detected at very low frequencies in soil and sediments. PAH occurred in low frequencies in soiL, shallow groundwater, surface water, and sediments. Concentrations of some metals differed among soil classes, with subaquifers and depths, and among watershed basins for surface water but not sediments. Most of the variation in metal concentrations was natural, but agriculture had increased Cr, Cu, Mn, and Zn.Document ID20000116077Acquisition SourceKennedy Space CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsShmalzer, Paul A.*(Dynamac Corp. Cocoa Beach, FL United States)*Hensley, Melissa A.*(Dynamac Corp. Cocoa Beach, FL United States)*Mota, Mario*(Dynamac Corp. Cocoa Beach, FL United States)*Hall, Carlton R.*(Dynamac Corp. Cocoa Beach, FL United States)*Dunlevy, Colleen A.*(Dynamac Corp. Cocoa Beach, FL United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 2000Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:208583NASA/TM-2000-208583Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS10-12180Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20000116077.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
945 Concord Street Framingham, MA 01701 T: (508)620‐5387 F: (508) 834‐1172  

E: kate@sullivandisabilitylaw.com 

October 24, 2017 

 

BY ELECTRONIC MAIL 

Office of Regulations and Interpretations, 

Employee Benefits Security Administration 

Department of Labor 

Re: Claims Procedure Regulations for Plans Providing Disability Benefits 

Examination 

RIN No.: 1210-AB39 

Regulation: 29 C.F.R. §2560.503-1 

Dear Deputy Assistant Secretary Hauser: 

 I have been in private practice representing individuals seeking their disability benefits for 

over fifteen years. The majority of my practice involves representing clients who have disability 

insurance policies through their employment that are governed by ERISA. I have represented 

hundreds of clients who have had their ability to understand an adverse decision by an insurance 

company directly impacted by the Department’s regulations setting forth their rights to obtain 

information relevant to the rationale for the decision made on their claim. 

 I am writing due to my concern over the proposed delay in implementation of the final 

rules. The finalized rules were issued after an extensive notice and comment period, allowing the 

Department to receive comments from all sides. Some comments by insurers and plans included 

discussion of a possible increase in costs associated with implementing the rules. The Department 

undertook significant evaluation of the comments from all sides and promulgated the regulations. 

The delay that is now being proposed does not appear to be as well thought out or even-handed as 

the original notice and comment period. 

Without transparency or explanation, the Department suggests that the final rules are under 

reconsideration, but no specifics are being made available to understand what is forming the basis 

of that reconsideration. The only thing that is apparent is that the insurance industry is attempting 

to reverse regulations without following the procedures in place to insure fairness and 

transparency. It is very concerning that the delay is based upon a confidential study that predicts 

an increase in premiums. No basis for that increase in premiums is being revealed. The insurance 
Department of Labor 

October 24, 2017 

Page 2 of 2 

  

industry apparently asserts that meaningful dialogue and transparency with claimants drives up 

costs but there is no willingness to reveal the details of that claim. 

There should be no delay as the rule-making process is closed and it is fundamentally unfair 

to claimants who rely upon the Department to insure transparency and access to information. I 

respectfully request that the Department not delay implementation of the final regulations. 

 Sincerely, 

 

 M. Katherine Sullivan
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of Comarco, Inc. I, Daniel R. Lutz, Chief Financial Officer of Comarco, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | This annual report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Comarco, Inc.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                        
|----------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 1, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/    DANIEL R. LUTZ  
|                  |  |  |  | Daniel R. Lutz         
|                  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Gen. Petraeus letter of appreciation to CENTCOM personnel
 By None  , U.S. Central Command
  Click here to read a full-size PDF of Gen. Petraeus’ letter of appreciation to CENTCOM personnel.
<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 11

Southampton Partners, Inc.

EPS Calculations for period December 31, 2001 to March 31, 2002

Basic                    ($.036)

Diluted                  ($.036)

EPS Calculations for period December 31, 2001 to June 30, 2002

Basic                    ($.036)

Diluted                  ($.036)






                                      -11-


















<PAGE>



Table 3

The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.

                                                           6-MOS Ended
                                                          June 30, 2002
                                                        ------------------
Net Loss                                                     35,979
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses                        47,684
Total stockholders' equity                                  (35,979)
Primary Earnings Per Common Share                             (.036)
Fully Diluted Earnings Per Common Share                       (.036)



                                      -12-
From: Anna Clancy

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA

Subject: complaint

Date: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 11:55:03 AM

Hi, I am a dependent under my mother's insurance plan through her employer William

Floyd School District in Mastic Beach, NY. I contacted the district to get information about

the new laws and regulations passed for coverage of dependents until the age of 26, they

responded that the law does not apply to them. I found it hard to believe that a federal

law would not apply to them, I gave them a link to the site where I was getting my

information from and asked for an explanation of why this did not apply to them, they

responded that they are self-insured. I read further into the new law and found that self

insured companies are mandated to this law, as long as they provided coverage for

dependents in the past. I seem to get no where with them, when they do answer it's one

sentence. Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated, thank you so much.
California Home ARB: Home Search Site Map Software Contact Us AQD: Home

Select 8 Summary FAQs

PM2.5 PM10

Natl Annual Std

Design Value

National 24-Hour

Design Value

High National

24-Hour Average

Monitoring Sites 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013

Ventura County

El Rio-Rio Mesa School #2 8.7 9.0 17 17 56.3 45.9

Ojai-Ojai Avenue * * * * 17.1 *

Piru-3301 Pacific Avenue 8.6 8.2 17 18 * *

Simi Valley-Cochran Street 8.9 9.1 18 20 39.5 41.1

Thousand Oaks-Moorpark

Road 9.0 9.1 20 20 * *

Notes: PM10 statistics may include data that are related to an exceptional event.

* There was insufficient (or no) data available to determine the value.

Go to: Data Statistics Home Page Select 8 Summary Start Page
From: Jeffrey Liautaud [mailto:loquate@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 9:33 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: EBSA Proposed regulations - comment

Dear EBSA, 

 

EBSA Proposed regulations - Why so much confusion? 

 

Human nature focuses on problems, instead of building on what is already working well. 

EBSA proposed regulations focus on exemptions to fiduciary liability to improve 

investment advice, instead of focusing on what is already working well, namely 

investment advisors who take on ERISA 3(38) fiduciary liability. 

 

It is highly unlikely that any given business owner/named fiduciary has appointed, and 

that an investment advisor was willing to accept, as I would, to act as a 3(38) Erisa 

investment advisor fiduciary thereby more certainly removing a layer of investment 

advice fiduciary risk to the business owner/named fiduciary. The fiduciary liability is a 

personal liability. This means if something goes wrong, the business owner/named 

fiduciary is personally liable. Someone should tell the business owner/named fiduciary 

for their own good. 

 

An idea of extreme value for EBSA to drive investment advice may be adding language 

to Form 5500 annual 401k plan report: Our plan  does, or  does not, have a 3(38) 

fiduciary investment advisor who has full discretion for investment selection and 

monitoring, and if so whose name is _________________. 

 

At one time Mr. Liautaud was a Registered Representative receiving commissions from 

insurance companies. At another time he was a Registered Representative working for a 

wire house broker dealer. At yet another time he was dually registered as a Registered 

Representative and as a Registered Investment Advisor. Today he is solely a Registered 

Investment Advisor and Fiduciary. He signs his name that way on correspondence thus 

letting the world know he is both a Registered Investment Advisor and a Fiduciary. This 

is a migratory path followed by many advisors. 

 

The cost of becoming a fiduciary is still too expensive and the liability too great for 

insurance companies, wire house broker dealers and some Registered Investment 

Advisors who are not 3(38) fiduciaries. But the best, and least recognized, value is still 

an Erisa 3(38) fiduciary. 

 

According to the Center for Due Diligence on 1/12/2010 “A select group of skilled 

retirement plan advisors will acknowledge Erisa fiduciary status in writing and accept 

liability for discretionary investment control.” 

 
Jeff Liautaud, Registered Investment Advisor and Erisa 3(38) Fiduciary 

Tree Fort Financial 

773-621-0863
#### Elijah H. Purdy and others, *Respondents, v.*Edwin J. Dunning, Jr., *Appellant.*

— Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
#### § 821.43 Effect of law judge's initial decision or appealable order and appeal therefrom.

If no appeal from the law judge's initial decision or appealable order is timely filed, the initial decision or order shall become final with respect to the parties, but shall not be binding precedent for the Board. The filing of a timely notice of appeal with the Board shall stay the effectiveness of the law judge's initial decision or order, unless the basis for the decision or order is that the Board lacks jurisdiction.
#### § 663.15 Compliance.

A recipient subject to this part shall comply with all applicable requirements of this part. Such compliance is a condition of receiving Federal financial assistance from FTA. A recipient determined not to be in compliance with this part will be subject to the immediate suspension, withholding, or repayment of Federal financial assistance from FTA or other appropriate actions unless and until it comes into compliance with this part.
#### § 804.9 Transcripts, recordings, or minutes of closed meetings.

Along with the General Counsel's certification and presiding officer's statement referred to in § 804.6(d), the NTSB shall maintain a complete transcript of electronic recording adequate to record fully the proceedings of each meeting, or a portion thereof, closed to the public. The NTSB may maintain a set of minutes in lieu of such transcript or recording for meetings closed pursuant to § 804.5 (h) or (j). Such minutes shall fully and clearly describe all matters discussed and shall provide a full and accurate summary of any actions taken, and the reasons therefor, including a description of each of the views expressed on any item and the record of any rollcall vote. All documents considered in connection with any actions shall be identified in such minutes.
#### Mary Haley, Appellant, v. Mary Lavery and others, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed ou opinion of Special Term.

Landon, J., not acting.