alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2



Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Janet N. Gutkin, Chief Accounting Officer of Comarco, Inc., certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Comarco, Inc.;
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date: May 27, 2016 |  | /s/Janet N. Gutkin            | 
|------------------ |  | ----------------------------- | 
|                   |  | Janet N. Gutkin               | 
|                   |  | Chief Accounting Officer      | 
|                   |  | (Principal Financial Officer) |
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fact Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jacqueline Danforth, President and Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  August 7, 2008

By:  /s/ Jacqueline Danforth

Name:  Jacqueline Danforth

Title:    President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal

Accounting Officer)
U.S., UK Navies Respond to Merchant Vessel Distress Call in Strait of Hormuz
 
  By U.S. Naval Forces Central Command Public Affairs
  United States and United Kingdom Royal Navy forces responded to a distress call from a merchant vessel transiting the Strait of Hormuz, June 4, as Iranian fast-attack boats harassed the commercial ship. The internationally flagged merchant vessel made a radio distress call at 4:56 p.m. local time while transiting the narrow strait. The civilian crew reported three fast-attack craft with armed personnel approached and followed the merchant vessel at close distance. The fast-attacked craft were assessed to be from the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy. U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyer USS McFaul (DDG 74) and UK Royal Navy frigate HMS Lancaster (F 229) both received the distress call, and Lancaster launched a helicopter to provide surveillance. U.S. 5th Fleet also directed a P-8A Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft to monitor the scene. The situation deescalated approximately an hour later when the merchant vessel confirmed the fast-attack craft departed the scene. The merchant ship continued transiting the Strait of Hormuz without further incident. U.S. 5th Fleet remains vigilant and is bolstering defense around the key strait with partners to enhance regional maritime security and stability.
```

[109th Congress Public Law 138]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ138.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 2647]]

Public Law 109-138
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To authorize early repayment of obligations to the Bureau of Reclamation 
    within Rogue River Valley Irrigation District or within Medford 
      Irrigation District. <<NOTE: Dec. 22, 2005 -  [H.R. 4195]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Southern Oregon 
Bureau of Reclamation Repayment Act of 2005.>> 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Southern Oregon Bureau of Reclamation 
Repayment Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. EARLY REPAYMENT.

    Notwithstanding the provisions of section 213 of the Reclamation 
Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 390mm), any landowner within Rogue River 
Valley Irrigation District or within Medford Irrigation District, in 
Oregon, may repay, at any time, the construction costs of the project 
facilities allocated to that landowner's lands within the district in 
question. Upon discharge, in full, of the obligation for repayment of 
the construction costs allocated to all lands the landowner owns in the 
district in question, those lands shall not be subject to the ownership 
and full-cost pricing limitations of the Act of June 17, 1902 (43 U.S.C. 
371 et seq.), and Acts supplemental to and amendatory of that Act, 
including the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 390aa et seq.).

SEC. 3. LIMITATION.

    Nothing herein modifies contractual rights that may exist between 
Rogue River Valley Irrigation District and Medford Irrigation District 
and the United States under their respective Reclamation contracts, or 
amends or reopens those contracts; nor does it modify any rights, 
obligations or relationships that may exist between the districts and 
their landowners as may be provided or governed by Oregon State law.

SEC. 4. CERTIFICATION.

    Upon the request of a landowner who has repaid, in full, the 
construction costs of the project facilities allocated to that 
landowner's lands owned within the district, the Secretary of the 
Interior shall provide the certification provided for in subsection

[[Page 119 STAT. 2648]]

(b)(1) of section 213 of the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 
390mm(b)(1)).

    Approved December 22, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4195 (S. 1760):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 109-323 (Comm. on Resources).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 109-197 accompanying S. 1760 (Comm. on Energy and 
Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            Dec. 6, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 16, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
----

----

I Communications

Commission

----

Taux de change de l'euro (1)

5 mai 2004

(2004/C 130/01)

1 euro == 

----

(1)

Source: taux de change de référence publié par la Banque centrale européenne.

----

III Informations

Commission

----

AVIS D'APPEL À PROPOSITIONS

Initiative européenne pour la démocratie et les droits de l'homme (IEDDH)

Promotion de la démocratie, de la bonne gouvernance et de l'État de droit

EuropeAid/119508/C/G

(2004/C 130/02)

La Commission européenne lance un appel à propositions en vue de promouvoir la démocratie, la bonne gouvernance et l'État de droit dans un ou plusieurs pays visés par l'IEDDH et figurant dans les lignes directrices, dans le cadre de l'aide financière de l'Initiative européenne pour la démocratie et les droits de l'homme des Communautés européennes.

La version intégrale des lignes directrices à l'intention des demandeurs peut être consultée à l'adresse suivante: «Commission européenne, EuropeAid, unité F6, 54 rue Joseph II, bureau 01/140, B-1049 Bruxelles» et sur le site Internet suivant:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/europeaid/cgi/frame12.pl.

La date limite pour la soumission des propositions préliminaires est le 29 juin 2004 à 16 h 00, heure de Bruxelles.

----

----

AVIS AUX LECTEURS

Une édition spéciale du Journal officiel de l'Union européenne comprenant les textes des actes des institutions et de la Banque centrale européenne adoptés avant l'adhésion sera publiée en langue estonienne, hongroise, lettone, lituanienne, maltaise, polonaise, slovaque, slovène et tchèque. Les volumes de cette édition paraîtront progressivement entre le 1er mai et la fin de l'année 2004.

Dans ces conditions et en attente de la publication de ces volumes, la version électronique des textes est disponible sur EUR-Lex.

L'adresse du site EUR-Lex est: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/fr/accession.html

----
FY 2003 Exhibit 10.16




Exhibit 10.16

Mortgage Assistance Agreement


Effective February 12, 2002, Sal Jamil and Corio, Inc. hereby agree as
follows:


Subject to Mr. Jamil's continuing employment with Corio, Inc. (which remains
terminable by Corio at will), Corio intends to pay Sal Jamil up to Forty-Five
Thousand Dollars ($45,000) per year for up to the next five (5) years, payable
in monthly installments according to Corio' s payment policies as determined by
Corio, for assistance with Mr. Jamil' s mortgage associated with his primary
residence. Any such payment is further subject to Mr. Jamil providing Corio
evidence of such obligations related to his mortgage associated with his primary
residence prior to any such payment. Any such payment shall be subject to income
tax be borne by Mr. Jamil.  In the event Mr. Jamil' s employment terminates
for any reason whatsoever, any such payments shall cease, and, in the event Mr.
Jamil terminates his employment with Corio within the next two (2) years, Mr.
Jamil shall immediately be required to repay Corio any and all such payments
paid by Corio to Mr. Jamil from the effective date hereof up to the date of
termination.


In the event of default hereunder by Mr. Jamil, Corio shall have full
recourse against him. If any action is instituted by Corio for the collection of
amounts due under this Agreement, the reasonable costs of Corio, including
attorneys' fees and expenses among any other reasonable costs, shall be paid by
Mr. Jamil. Any such action shall be held in a court or arbitration tribunal, at
Corio's discretion, in San Jose or San Francisco, California, and the
undersigned consents to all jurisdictional requirements to enable any such
action to be held in such location and at such tribunal. This Agreement shall be
governed by the laws of the State of California, without regard to the conflicts
of law provision thereof.  Mr. Jamil agrees to keep confidential the terms of
this Agreement.



	 	
Corio Inc.

	
/s/ Sal Jamil2/19/02
	 
	
Sal Jamil
	
By: 


	 	
George Kadifa, President and CEO
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

1 See D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman

, 460 U.S. 4 6 2 (1983); Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. , 263 U.S. 413 (1923). United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

August 18, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-11204 Summary Calendar

FRANCIS SHARPE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ROMA N CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF DALLAS; CHARLES V. GRAHMANN, Reverend,
His Predecessors and Successors, as Bishop of the Roman C atholic Diocese of Dallas; WINDLE TURLEY; RANDAL MATHIS; MONTE FITE,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:02-CV-522-G

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Francis Sharpe appeals the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 for lack of

jurisdicti on under the R ooker

- Feldman doctrine. 1 Sharpe argues

that his federal action does not amount to an attack on the prior2 See Davis v. Bayless

, 70 F.3d 367, 375 (5th Cir. 1995)

(“When is sues raised in a federal court are inextricably
intertwined with a state judgment and the court is in essence being

called upo n to review the state-court decision, the court lacks subject matter j urisdiction to conduct such a review.” (internal quotation marks omitted)).

3 Hale v. Harney , 786 F.2d 688, 691 (5th Cir. 1986).

2 state court judgment because his f ederal claims are not

inextricably intertwined with the merits of the state court suit.

Under the Rooker

- Feldman doctrine, “[w]hen issues raised in a

fed eral court are inextricably intertwined with a state judgment

and the court is in essence being called upon to review the statecourt decision, the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to

conduct such a review.” 2 Although Sharpe argues that his federal

suit differs from his state case because his federal complaint

claims that the defen dants violated his civil rights, “litigants

may not obtain review of state court actions by filing complaints

abou t those actions in lower federal courts cast in the form of

civil rights suits.” 3

Sharpe’s pleadings belie his argument that the Rooker

- Feldman

doctrine is i napplicable: His complaint specifically requests a

declaratory judgment that certain discarded church documents belong

to him and should be returned to him. The state court had

previously granted summary judgment to the defendants on Sharpe’s

claims requesting return of the documents. Sharpe’s federal action

is clearly inextricably intertwined with the judgment in his prior3

state court case. Therefore, the district court’s judgment of

dismissal is AFFIRMED.

The motions to dismiss filed by defendants Turley and Fite are

DENIED AS MOOT.
SERVED: FEBRUARY 7 2012 

'•^^'^^'"'^'iENTOF U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ^"rV^i' DrMJiATinKi 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS ' - -rVrf^^nrb^Typ,',Q 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

EVERGREEN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0022 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011 NM190013) has been 

assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and 

other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA 

Hearing Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List 

. Chief Administrative 

Attachment - Service List 
FDMS No. FAA-2012-0022 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

WilburVright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Catherine V. Dammel, Respondent's Counsel 

DammelLaw, PLLC 

1200 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1920 

Seattle, WA 98101 

TEL: 206-624-9914 

FAX: 206-624-9827 

David F. Shayne, Coniplaifianrs Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, WA 98057 

TEL: 425-227-2165 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 . 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

J200 New Jersey Avenue, S E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Service \v<is by U.S. Mail. For sen'ice in person or by expedited courier, use llie following address: 

Federal Aviation Administralion, 600 Independence Avenue. S.W.. Wilbur Wright Building— Suite 

2W1000, Washington, DC 2059 U Auenlion" Hearing Docket Clerk. AGC-430. 

-2-
#### § 578.5 Inflationary adjustment of civil penalties.

The civil penalties set forth in this part continue in effect until adjusted by the Administrator. The Administrator shall review the amount of these civil penalties annually and will, if appropriate, adjust them by rule.

[83 FR 60753, Nov. 27, 2018]
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT


TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and
the Chief Financial Officer of CT Communications, Inc. (the
Company), each hereby certifies that, to his
knowledge on the date hereof:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (a) the annual report on Form 10-K of
    the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002
    filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
    Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and
|
| | (b) information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                    



|                        | 
|----------------------- | 
|/s/ MICHAEL R. COLTRANE | 
|                        | 
|Michael R. Coltrane     | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 
|March 28, 2003          | 
|                       
|/s/ JAMES E. HAUSMAN    | 
|                        | 
|James E. Hausman        | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 
|March 28, 2003          |
§ 655.12 Required elements of an anti-drug use and alcohol misuse program. An anti-drug use and alcohol misuse program shall include the following: ( a ) A statement describing the employer's policy on prohibited drug use and alcohol misuse in the workplace, including the consequences associated with prohibited drug use and alcohol misuse. This policy statement shall include all of the elements specified in § 655.15. Each employer shall disseminate the policy consistent with the provisions of § 655.16.
( b ) An education and training program which meets the requirements of § 655.14.
( c ) A testing program, as described in Subparts C and D of this part, which meets the requirements of this part and 49 CFR Part 40.
( d ) Procedures for referring a covered employee who has a verified positive drug test result or an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or greater to a Substance Abuse Professional, consistent with 49 CFR Part 40.
https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=...

REC-1YP6F)-0%) Page | of 1

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION WAR 3.0 2010
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS
BRANCH

[As of: March 30, 2010
Received: March 30, 2010
Status: Posted
PUBLIC SUBMISSION [restet: verso 2010
'Comments Due: May 03, 2010]
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0006
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants & Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Comment On: IRS-2010-0006-0001
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Document: IRS-2010-0006-0061
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-02028

Submitter Information

Name: Harry J Durham
Address:
League City, TX,
Organization: Self
- — Sn

General Comment

I oppose strongly the proposal to impose addtional government control on the management and
disposition of 401(k) and IRA accounts.

The US government in general, and the IRS specifically, is not better informed than me on how I
should manage my financial assets, either in acquisition or disposition.

The failure of the government to balance Medicare and Social Security expenditures against
revenues is not a record that inspires my trust that you can do better than I.

Harry J, Durham

3/30/2010
H. Res. 524

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 19, 2002.

Whereas the death tax has been a leading cause of the dissolution of family-run businesses and a burden on families which save and invest;

Whereas a bipartisan majority of the House of Representatives passed the Permanent Death Tax Repeal Act of

2002 on June 6, 2002, by a vote of 256 to 171;

Whereas failure to enact that Act will reimpose the death tax

after 2010 on families, farms and small businesses

throughout the Nation;

Whereas the death tax will continue to prevent families from

creating, expanding, and retaining farms and businesses

if the death tax is resurrected;

Whereas the threat of a resurrected death tax will cause

American families, including farmers and small business

owners, to waste vast amounts of their time and other resources on efforts to plan to comply with the tax;–

Whereas permanent repeal of the death tax will promote job

creation and economic growth by allowing farm and small

business families to invest in productive, job-creating assets those resources they will otherwise spend on planning for and paying death taxes; and
2

•HRES 524 EH

Whereas the Senate has not passed that Act or equivalent

legislation: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that the Congress should complete action on the Permanent Death Tax Repeal Act of 2002, and the Congress

should present to the President prior to adjournment the Permanent Death Tax Repeal Act of 2002.

Attest:

Clerk.
USS Georgia Transits Strait of Hormuz
 
  By U.S. Naval Forces Central Command Public Affairs
  MANAMA, Bahrain – The nuclear-power Ohio-class guided-missile submarine USS Georgia (SSGN 729) along with the guided-missile cruisers USS Port Royal (CG 73) and USS Philippine Sea (CG 58) transited the Strait of Hormuz entering the Arabian Gulf, Dec. 21. Georgia’s presence in the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations (AOO) demonstrates the U.S. Navy’s ability to sail and operate wherever international law allows. As an inherently flexible maneuver force, capable of supporting routine and contingency operations, Georgia’s presence demonstrates the United States’ commitment to regional partners and maritime security with a full spectrum of capabilities to remain ready to defend against any threat at any time. SSGNs are one of the most versatile platforms in the fleet, equipped with superior communications capabilities and the ability to carry up to 154 Tomahawk land-attack cruise missiles. The platform can also be configured to host up to 66 Special Operations Forces. The 5th Fleet AOO encompasses about 2.5 million square miles of water area and includes the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, Red Sea and parts of the Indian Ocean. The expanse is comprised of 20 countries and includes three chokepoints, critical to the free flow of global commerce.