alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page | of 1

7 /eyf2Q-]/ QO
yecaLprocessinc ivision §— SZ C-//5 WAAC
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS f AUS 8 2010

As of: August 06, 2010

PUBLIC Status: Posted

Posted: August 06, 2010
S U B M I SSI 0] N nine nes cer Setember 15, 2010

Submission Type: Web.

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0002
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Status as Grandfathered Health Plan uncer
the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Cross-Reference

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0041
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14487

Submitter Information

Name: Unknown 5

General Comment

Please see attached example of four health plan designs with HRA components. If the insurance
plan does not make changes and qualifies as grandfathered, but the HRA plan changed and
reduced deductible reimbursement will the insurance plan lose grandfathered status?

Attachments

IRS-2010-0010-0041.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14487

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 8/6/2010


Cient #1

Gient #2

$3,500 / $3,500 QHDHP

$6,000 / $12,000 Deductible ‘ 100% $4,000 / $8,000 Deductible
80% Coinsurance Coinsurance 100% Coinsurance
Max OOP $1,500 / $3,000 Max OOP $5,200 / $5,200
Ast $250 / $500 of Deductible
F - , 20% of remaining $3,750 / $7,500}
$0 Deductible / $0 Coinsurance $500 / $1,000 Deductible Deductible or $750 / $1,500
TOTAL $1,000 / $2,000
$6,000 / $12,000 Deductible . 80% of remaining $3,750 / $7,500}
80% Coinsurance $3,000 / $2,500 Deductible Deductible or $3,000 / $6,000
Max OOP $1,500 / $3,000 TOTAL $3,000 / $6,000

Standalone {employees submit
HRA claims manually)

integrated with insurance plan

Standalone (employees submit
HRA claims manually)

This is a QHDHP administered
100% as an HRA. No HSA
attached



Client #4
$2,500 / $5,000 QHDHP
80% Coinsurance
Max OOP $5,000 / $10,000

Deductible paired w/HSA Account|

ER funds HSA $1,000 / $2,000
ER Reimburses 100% of
Coinsurance as an HRA

Standalone (employees submi
HRA claims manually}
This is a QHDHP administered as
an HSA for the Deductible portion|
and an HRA for the coinsurance
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Michael Mattis, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Marc J. Whiten, J. at initial plea; Ann E. Scherzer, J. at re-plea and sentencing), rendered March 7, 2013, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of disorderly conduct, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Marc J. Whiten, J. at initial plea; Ann E. Scherzer, J. at re-plea and sentencing), rendered March 7, 2013, affirmed.</p><p>The record amply establishes that defendant's plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. Defendant entered into a plea agreement that contemplated that he would initially plead guilty to forcible touching (<i>see</i> Penal Law ยง 130.52), but would ultimately have that conviction reduced to disorderly conduct (<i>see</i> Penal Law ยง 240.20), a violation, if he, inter alia, was not rearrested during the next year and completed the Applied Behavioral Sciences program. At the plea proceeding, the court advised defendant of the rights he was waiving by pleading guilty (<i>see Boykin v Alabama</i>, 395 US 238 [1969]), including the right to a trial, the right against self-incrimination and the right to confront his accusers (<a href="../2015/2015_08615.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Conceicao</i>, 26 NY3d 375</a> [2015]).</p><p>We find unavailing defendant's present claim that the court failed to advise him of all his <i>Boykin</i> rights when he repleaded to disorderly conduct. The initial plea allocution sufficiently established defendant's understanding of his <i>Boykin</i> rights for purposes of the later plea, inasmuch as the second plea was essentially an extension of the first plea, but with the conviction reduced to a violation for defendant's benefit (<a href="../2015/2015_09621.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Muir</i>, 134 AD3d 641</a> [2015], <i>lv denied </i>26 NY3d 1147 [2016]; <a href="../2015/2015_25122.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Hildinghohlson</i>, 48 Misc 3d 30</a> [2015], <i>lv denied </i>25 NY3d 1202 [2015]). "Having already waived his rights, a rigorous and detailed colloquy at defendant's replea to a lesser charge, carrying with it a lesser sentence, would have been an unnecessary formalism" <i>(People v Muir</i>, 134 AD3d at 641 [internal quotation marks omitted]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: October 16, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: June 22, 2015 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket I d: OAR

–2013 - 0602 FROM: Howard J. Hoffman , EPA - OGC SUBJECT: June 22, 2015 Phone Call with EDF Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for

Existing Power Plants **SUMMARY** On June 22 , 2015 , Vickie Patton of the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) called to discuss legal issues concerning the proposed Clean Power Plan for existing power plants.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled

# AGENCY:

Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled.

# ACTION:

Proposed deletions from the Procurement List.

# SUMMARY:

The Committee is proposing to delete product(s) from the Procurement List that were furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.

# DATES:

*Comments must be received on or before:*                         September 24, 2023.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled, 355 E Street SW, Suite 325, Washington, DC 20024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For further information or to submit comments contact: Michael R. Jurkowski, Telephone: (703) 785-6404, or email                         *CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This notice is published pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 8503(a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed actions.

## Deletions

The following product is proposed for deletion from the Procurement List:

### Product(s)

*NSN(s)—Product Name(s):*                         7210-00-266-9740—Cot Insect Net Protector, Olive Green                    

*Contracting Activity:*                         DLA TROOP SUPPORT, PHILADELPHIA, PA                    

Michael R. Jurkowski,

Acting Director, Business Operations.

[FR Doc. 2023-18356 Filed 8-24-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
SERVE D DECEMBE R13 , 201 0

U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C

^ IN TH EMATTE RO F ] l SUSA N RICHARDSO N FA A DOCKE T NO
. CPIONMOO1 3 y- l (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S NO
. FAA-2010-121 0 :p&p-n i 

### ^.RlMENTO F -V^;SP0RWI0 N "r'^ TOPERA

' " Ci O DE C ! 3 P2 : UI

NOTIC EO FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofor e designate da s Cas e No
. 2010NM730034 ) ha s bee n assigne dt o Administrativ e La w Judg e Richar dC
. Goodwin
. All future pleading s an d othe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do n th e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r person s o n th e attache dServic e List
.

Ronni e A
. Yode r Chie f Administrativ e La^rjftiSg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No
. CP10NM00I 3 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W , Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 ' ON ECOP Y Susa n Richardson , Responden t 1198 7 N
. County Roa dT Hayward , W I 5484 3 Glenn H
. Brown , Complainant' s Counse l Senio r Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counsel , AAL- 7 Alaskan Regio n Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 22 2 Wes t 7 * Avenue , #1 4 Anchorage , A K

99513-758 7 TEL : 907-271-527 1 FAX : 907-271-280 0 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC
. Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federa l Aviatio n Administration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430
.
#### § 585.115 Response to inquiries.

At any time prior to August 31, 2018, each manufacturer must, upon request from the Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, provide information identifying the vehicles (by make, model, and vehicle identification number) that have been certified as complying with Standard No. 216a (49 CFR 571.216a). The manufacturer's designation of a vehicle as a certified vehicle is irrevocable. Upon request, the manufacturer also must specify whether it intends to utilize carry-forward credits, and the vehicles to which those credits relate.
COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS WESTERN CAUCUS
WE2D\ | COMMUNICATIONS CHAIRMAN

WOMEN'S CAUCUS
Co-CHalnMaN

Suucommurree on
Lamon, HEALTH ANO HUMAN Seavicrs,
Eoucanion

Suncommirre on

erie Cynthia M. Lummis ——-a
, 101TH AMENDMENT TASK FORCE
riecommorrsethaneoree Congress of the United States
VICE-CHAIRMAN: Wyoming REPUBLICAN STUDY COMMITTEE
July 8, 2011 3

zx
mw

m
—

The Honorable Hilda L. Solis

U.S. Department of Labor

Frances Perkins Building

Third Street and Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20210

HLAY VA Tar Ale

(HA

Ct

ae
65

Dear Secretary Solis:

I write to express my concern regarding the Department of Labor’s proposed changes to
the regulatory structure for and definition of “fiduciary”. I urge you to suspend the

rulemaking in order to examine and address potential adverse consequences for
Individual Retirement Account (IRA) holders.

I am concerned that the proposal could result in investors receiving less investment
information at a higher cost. The Department’s proposal would limit access to the
commission-based compensation model used by brokers that serves the IRA plan market.
This could eliminate access to investment services for millions of individuals, particularly
middle-income investors for whom the fee-based compensation model is either
unaffordable or inaccessible because of account minimums. A recent study by the Oliver
Wyman Group concluded that over 7 million IRAs would lose access to investment

services because of this regulation. The same report found that approximately 360,000
fewer IRAs would be opened each year.

In light of these findings, I am concerned that the Department did not conduct a separate
economic analysis on the proposal’s effects on the availability of IRAs and the cost of
services to individuals owning IRAs. Any attempt to change the regulatory structure
governing investment relationships in the retirement planning marketplace should be

supported by economic data and designed to avoid disruption and uncertainty for
investors.

1 am troubled by the Department’s apparent plan to move quickly and haphazardly to
implement this regulation. It is unworkable in its current form and there is evidence that
it could have detrimental consequences for investors. As such, I urge you to suspend the

2120 Caprrot Avenuc, Sure 8005 100 Easr 8 Stneer, Surre 4003 113 CaNNoN House Orrice BuLOING 404 "N" Sracer, Surre 204 45 Loucks
Cheyenne, WY 82001 Casper, WY 82602 WaSHNGTON, DC 20515 Rock Seainas, WY 82901 SHERD/
Prone (307) 772-2595, Puone (307) 261-6595 Puone (202) 225-2311 Prone (307) 362-4095 Prone (307) 673-4608

Fax (307) 772-2597 Fax (307) 261-6597 Fax (202) 225-3057 Fax (307) 362-4097 Fax (307) 673-4982

PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER


rulemaking process and perform the analysis necessary to determine the impacts on IRA
holders before any final regulations are promulgated.

Thank you in advance for your attention to this request. | look forward to your timely
response.

Sincerely,

Cynthia M. Lummis
Member of Congress
From: Joe Valenzuela GR-Imap [mailto:jvalenzuela@ma-adviser.com] 

Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 10:35 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: DOL Fiduciary Rule

Please accept my email as my position on the status of the proposed DOL Fiduciary Rule regarding 

Indexed annuities. I am a strong advocate of doing what is right for my clients. I do not need nor agree 

with having to enact a rule regarding this matter when the industry ALREADY has specific guidance, 

paperwork, compliance training for agents, and products designed for our clients that fit this rule.

A couple of years ago, this matter was addressed in trying to make an insurance product that is sold in 

the insurance industry that is not an investment, rather a safe savings that does not participate in the 

market, and attempt to pretend that is it an investment. After all the discussions, it was concluded that 

it was not a security.

Again, what the selfish reasons that Government wishes to become financial advisors again, this Rule is 

not an added value to be enacted, and such I do not favor its passing.

My Best Regards,

Joe Valenzuela, MBA

Valenzuela Financial Management Group

Investment Advisor Representative/ Managing Partner

12555 Orange Drive, Suite 223

Davie, Florida 33330

(954) 680-4088 (Office)

(954) 275-4849 (Mobile)

(954) 416-4417 (Fax)

Financial Advice is offered through Mid Atlantic Financial Management, Inc. (MAFM) a Registered 

Investment Adviser. Valenzuela Financial Management Group, Inc. is not a registered entity or a 

subsidiary or control affiliate of MAFM.

Confidentiality Note: The information contained in this e-mail and in any attached files is confidential and 

intended for internal use of the individual named in the email. This information should not be duplicated 

or distributed unless an express written consent is obtained from Valenzuela Financial Management 

Group, Inc., in advance. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me immediately and delete 

any attachments. Thank You.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 307 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 106
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 307

                          [Report No. 107-324]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 2944) making appropriations for the government of the 
  District of Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in 
 part against the revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending 
              September 30, 2002, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 5, 2001

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 2944) making appropriations for the government of the 
  District of Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in 
 part against the revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending 
              September 30, 2002, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
2944) making appropriations for the government of the District of 
Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in part against 
the revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
2002, and for other purposes. All points of order against the 
conference report and against its consideration are waived. The 
conference report shall be considered as read.
                                                 House Calendar No. 106

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 307

                          [Report No. 107-324]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 2944) making appropriations for the government of the 
  District of Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in 
 part against the revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending 
              September 30, 2002, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            December 5, 2001

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
February 29, 2016

Federal Aviation Administration 600 IndependenceAvenue S.W. Wilbur WrightBldg.- Suite 2Wl000 Washington, DC 20591 Attention: HearingDocket ClerkAGC-430
Re: FAAFile No. 2012S0700374 Request for Hearing Dear Clerk: 

# !!Fros~ 

# tit6wn

# 1oddLW
ATTORNEYS Winston E Miller Member 502.568.0296 (t) 502.581.1087 (f) wmiller@fbtlaw.com

VIAUPS Overnight and RegularU.S. Mail

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 13.16(g)(2)(ii) United Parcel Service, Inc. (an Ohio Corporation, "UPS Ground") and United Parcel Service Co. (a Delaware Corporation, "UPS Airlines") through its undersigned counsel hereby files a request for hearing regarding the Federal Aviation Administration's ("FAA's") Final Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty

- FAA File No. 2012S0700374 dated February 10, 2016 ("Final Notice") and received on February 16, 2016, in which the FAA proposed to assess a civil penalty in the amount of $3,250. This Request for Hearing is being made on behalf ofUPS Ground and UPS Airlines because the Final Notice references and is based upon Notice ofProposed Civil Penalty FAA File No. 2012S0700374 dated September4, 2014 which was issued againstbothUPS Ground and UPS Airlines.

WinstonE. Miller Counsel for UnitedParcel Service, Inc. and UnitedParcel Service Co.

400 West Market Street I 32nd Floor I Louisville, Kentucky 40202-3363 I 502.589.5400 Ifrostbrowntodd.com Offices in Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, Tennessee, Virginia and West VirginiaFederal AviationAdministration Page 2 February 29,2016

cc: Ryan Landers EnforcementDivision, Southern Team 1701 ColumbiaAvenue College Park, GA 30337
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Ihereby certify that the foregoing Request for Hearing has been sent viaUPS overnight delivery, this 29'h day ofFebruary 2016. Federal Aviation Administration 600 Independence Avenue, SW Wilbur Wright Bldg.- Suite 2W1000 Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk (AGC-430) and a copy by certified mail- returnreceiptrequested and regularU.S. mail to: Ryan Landers Enforcement Division, Southern Team 1701 ColumbiaAvenue College Park, GA 30337

OOOOOXA0624664 4830-ll76-2222vl Counsel for United Parcel Service, r'iic. and United Parcel Service Co.

400 West Market Street I 32nd Floor I Louisville, Kentucky 40202-3363 I 502.589.5400 Ifrostbrowntodd.com Offices in Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia
#### § 605.14 Agreement.

Except as provided in § 605.11 no assistance shall be provided under the Acts unless the applicant and the Administrator shall have first entered into a written agreement that the applicant will not engage in school bus operations exclusively for the transportation of students and school personnel in competition with private school bus operators.
Docket: EBSA-2010-0050 

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’ 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0001 

Definition of the Term Fiduciary 

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0024 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-26236 

Submitter Information 

Name: Douglas John Brink 

Address: 

13500 Quincy St. 

Holland, MI, 49424 

Email: doug.brink@bradfordcompany.com 

Phone: 616-399-3000 

Organization: Bradford Company 

General Comment 

Dear sir or madam, 

I am a trustee for the Bradford Company Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP). 

I am writing to discourage the proposed definition of "fiduciary". I have a very simple rational . . . 

where would the responsibility end? 

I mean why stop with the appraiser? Why not make the company officers, lawyers, 

administrators, accountants, bankers or anyone else who touches the plan a fiduciary? 

The current system provides an adequate separation of duties and this proposed change will only 

add cost and complexity. 

Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. 

Kind regards, 

Doug Brink 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION 

As of: February 03, 2011 

Received: February 03, 2011 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80bda0b8 

Comments Due: February 03, 2011

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 2/3/2011