alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### JOHN HINCHLIFFE, Respondent, *v.*MARGARET SHEA, Appellant.

*Dower*— effect *of a married woman’s joining in a mortgage with her husband*— *when it binds herr subsequently rested dower estate.*

March 25, 1878, one Martin Shea and his wife, the defendant, executed a mortgage on certain real estate, then owned in fee by the husband, to secure the payment of a note given by him. April 8,1882. the premises were conveyed to Anne Horgan by the sheriff, in pursuance of a sale had in 1881, under an execution issued upon a judgment against the husband docketed in 1874 The husband died April 8, 1882. April 26,1883, Horgan conveyed the premises to the defendant. ,

In an action to foreclose the mortgage the judgment directed that the dower interest of the defendant in the real estate, which became vested in her on the death of the husband, should be sold.

*Held,*no error.

*Payne*v. *Becker*(87 N. Y., 158) followed

Appeal from a judgment in favor of tbe plaintiff, entered upon tbe trial of tbis action by tbe court without a jury.

On or about March 25, 1878, tbe firm of Shea & Scbnerr made their promissory note to tbe order of Martin Shea for $3,000, payable in one year from date. Martin Shea indorsed tbe note to Shaw, Hinchliffe & Penrose. At tbis time Martin Shea was seized in fee of tbe premises described in tbe complaint, and as collateral security for tbe payment of above note be executed to Shaw, Hinchliffe & Penrose the. mortgage set forth in tbe complaint. His wife Margaret Shea, tbe appellant, at tbe time bad no interest in tbe premises other than an inchoate right of dower} she joined with her husband in tbe mortgage. On June 8, 1874, a judgment was docketed in tbe office of tbe clerk of Kings county against Martin Shea in favor of P. K. Horgan and another. The premises were, in tbe year 1881, sold under tbe execution issued under tbis judgment, and on April 3, 1882, they were conveyed by tbe sheriff of Kings county to Anne Horgan. Martin Shea died April 8,1882. Anne Horgan, on or about April 26, 1882, conveyed the premises to tbe defendant and appellant Margaret Shea, and she is now in possession under tbe deed from Anne Horgan.

Tbe facts are not disputed, and tbe only question in tbe case is whether tbe plaintiff, by virtue of tbe mortgage described in tbe *366complaint, has any lien on the premises. The judge found that the vested dower interest of the defendant was subject to the mortgage, and. a judgment directing the sale of such interest was ordered.

*Francis T.*Magill, for the appellant.

*James M.*Baldwin, for the respondent.

Pratt, J.:

It may fairly be argued, since the case of *Payne*v. *Becker*(87 N. Y., 153), that the wife’s mortgage conveyed her inchoate right of dower to the mortgagee. If that be so, now that the right has become vested, it may be applied to the payment of the mortgage debt.

We are not disposed to interfere with the judgment below, which must be affirmed, but as the question is new, without costs.

Dtkman, J., concurred; Babnard, P. J., not sitting.

Judgment affirmed, without costs.
#### § 98.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to set forth the administrative enforcement procedures that the Department of Transportation will follow when there is an allegation that a former employee of the Department has violated 18 U.S.C. 207.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12** 
**- 6320** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,
Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
MALIK LUCIEN EANES, a/k/a Lucien Clarke Watts ,
Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. James R. Spencer , District Judge. ( 3:06

- cr
- 00173

- JRS

- 1 )

Submitted : April 19, 2012 Decided: April 26, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Malik Lucien Eanes, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Childs Ackley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Sara Elizabeth Chase, Richard Daniel Cooke, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Malik Lucien Eanes appeals the district court ’ s order
denying his motion for a sentence redu ction under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and conclude that

the district court did not abuse its discretion. See United

States v. Goines , 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (stating

standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm

. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Gen. Petraeus statement on recent attacks in Iraq
 By None  , CENTCOM Public Affairs
   MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. (Feb. 6, 2010) – Gen. David Petraeus, U.S. Central Command commander, made the following statement today about the recent attacks in Iraq on Shi'a pilgrims. "The recent attacks by Al Qaeda in Iraq on Shi'a pilgrims have once again demonstrated Al Qaeda's extremist hallmarks: the repeated employment of indiscriminate violence against fellow Muslims and the moral bankruptcy of an ideology that condones barbaric actions. These attacks have shown yet again that, rather than pointing the way to a brighter future for the Islamic world, Al Qaeda promotes the violent imposition of practices rejected by all but the most troubled members of global society."
-----Original Message----- 

From: DAVID GREENBERG, CITATION FINANCIAL G 

[mailto:dgreenberg10@bloomberg.net] 

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 9:07 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RFI 

To whom it may concern, there is no way I'm letting the government take 

over my retirement plan. My money will be going into a mattress before 

I give you responsibility for paying me a monthly income. I see how 

well Medicare and Social Security have been managed. 

David Greenberg
§ 25.300 Requirement for recipients to ensure subrecipients have a unique entity identifier. ( a ) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient that has not obtained a UEI and provided it to the recipient. Subrecipients are not required to complete full registration in *SAM.gov* to obtain a UEI.
( b ) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient obtains and provides a UEI to the recipient.
#### John Birmingham, Respondent, v. Mary Gorman, Appellant.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered before another referee, coBts to abide the event. Opinion by

Bradley, J.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 3-C


                       CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND MERGER
                                     MERGING
                           COLUMBIA ENERGY GROUP, INC.
                                      INTO
                          THE COLUMBIA GAS SYSTEM, INC.
                     (Pursuant to Section 253 of the General
                    Corporation Law of the State of Delaware)

         The Columbia Gas System, Inc., a corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Delaware (this "Corporation"), DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY:

         FIRST: That this Corporation owns all of the outstanding shares of
common stock (the only outstanding class of stock) of Columbia Energy Group,
Inc., a corporation incorporated on the 17th day of November 1997, pursuant to
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, 8 Del. C. Sections
101 et seq. (the "DGCL").

         SECOND: That this Corporation, by resolutions (the "Resolutions of
Merger") duly adopted by its Board of Directors, at a meeting thereof duly
called and held on the 19th day of November, 1997, at which a quorum was present
and acting throughout, determined to effect a merger of said Columbia Energy
Group, Inc. into itself, pursuant to Section 253 of the DGCL, in which this
Corporation shall be the surviving corporation (the "Merger"). A true and
correct copy of the Resolutions of Merger is annexed hereto as Exhibit A and
incorporated herein by reference. The Resolutions of Merger have not been
amended, modified, rescinded or revoked and are in full force and effect on the
date hereof.

         THIRD: That, as provided in the Resolutions of Merger: (a) Pursuant to
Section 253(b) of the DGCL, upon the Merger becoming effective, the name of the
surviving corporation shall be changed from "The Columbia Gas System, Inc." to
"Columbia Energy Group"; and (b) Pursuant to Section 102(a)(I) of the DGCL, the
undersigned hereby certifies that the surviving corporation's total assets, as
defined in 8 Del. C. Section 503(i), are not less than $10,000,000.00.

         FOURTH: That the Merger shall become effective at 5:00 p.m. upon the
date of filing of this certificate with the Office of the Secretary of State of
the State of Delaware.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Columbia Gas System, Inc., has caused this
Certificate to be executed and acknowledged in accordance with Section 103 of
the DGCL by Oliver G. Richard III, its Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer.

                                    THE COLUMBIA GAS SYSTEM, INC.



                                    By /s/ Oliver G. Richard III
                                       -------------------------------
                                       Oliver G. Richard III
                                       Chairman, President and
                                       Chief Executive Officer
From: dongau2@comcast.net [mailto:dongau2@comcast.net] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 4:30 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

I am strongly against any forced annuitization feature of 401k accounts.
ECONOMIC AND REGULATORY EVALUATION

Regulatory Evaluation Form, Revision 2.0 Page 1 of 1

2/2/2012

AD Title: Combustion Liner Inspections

Docket No. FAA-2009-0162 Directorate Identifier: 2004-NE-19-AD

Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Costs per Product (e.g., engine, propeller)

WorkhoursLabor cost 

(@$80/hour)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspections 2.00 $ 160.00 $0 $ 160.00 18 $2,880

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $2,880

Costs covered under warranty $

Special considerations for Economic Analysis:

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES explain below NO 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES explain below NO 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES explain below NO 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES explain below NO 

Explanation:
-----Original Message----- 

From: Mike Lenker [mailto:mlenker27@aol.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 8:39 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 

Re: "Lifetime distribution option" 

Lifetime distribution is already an option, since anyone can buy an 

annuity upon retirement and 401k disbursement. Engrafting it onto the 

401k itself would tend to narrow options for retirees, because it would 

lessen competition to provide such annuities. There would be a tendency 

for the 401k providers to "guide" (force) retirees into the providers' 

own products. There would be an even greater incentive than now exists 

for the providers (i.e., bankers) to lobby the government for 

regulatory provisions requiring use of their products and making it 

harder to clients to leave. It would ultimately decrease flexibility 

and increase the vulnerability of retirement assets to mismanagement by 

the provider and to redirection (seizure) by the government. This 

perception would decrease employee participation in such plans. 

Michael Lenker 

1328 Kenilworth Ave, 

Charlotte, NC 28203
# French Navy frigate seizes $5.2 Million worth of Narcotics

/ Published Sept. 23, 2021

French Marine Nationale frigate FS Languedoc, operating in support of the Combined Maritime Forces (CMF), seized more than 1,600 kg of illegal drugs during a maritime counter-narcotics operation in the Indian Ocean, Sept. 20.

The intercept and search of a vessel suspected of smuggling resulted in the seizure of more than 1,525 kg of hash and 166 kg of methamphetamine with a combined value of over $5.2 million.

Languedoc was conducting patrols in support of CMF’s New Zealand-led Combined Task Force (CTF) 150 when it seized the illegal drugs.

“The seizure of narcotics from a dhow in the Indian Ocean is testament to the strong partnership between CMF, the Marine Nationale and CTF 150, said Royal New Zealand Navy Capt. Brendon Clark, commander of CTF 150. “Languedoc has once again demonstrated that through collaboration with like-minded partners, CMF isable to seize and destroy millions of dollars’ worth of narcotics, the income from which would otherwise be used to fund illicit activities and terrorism.”

CTF 150’s mission is to disrupt criminal and terrorist organizations and their related illicit activities, including the movement of personnel, weapons, narcotics and charcoal. CTF 150 conducts maritime security operations outside the Arabian Gulf to ensure legitimate commercial shipping transits the region freely from non-statethreats.

CMF is a multinational maritime partnership of 34 nations that includes three task forces. It exists to uphold international rules-based order by countering illicit non- state actors on the high seas and promoting security, stability, and prosperity across approximately 3.2 million square miles of international waters encompassing some ofthe world’s most important shipping lanes.
<PAGE>
                                                                     Exhibit 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

                         COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
              Annual Report on Form lO-K for the Fiscal Year Ended
                                December 31, 1998

         The undersigned  directors of COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY,  an Ohio
corporation  (the "Company"),  do hereby  constitute and appoint E. LINN DRAPER,
JR.,   ARMANDO  A.  PENA  and  HENRY  W.   FAYNE,   and  each  of  them,   their
attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  to execute for them, and in their names,  and in
any and all of their capacities,  the Annual Report of the Company on Form lO-K,
pursuant to Section 13 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1998, and any and all  amendments  thereto,  and to file
the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith,
with   the   Securities   and   Exchange   Commission,    granting   unto   said
attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  and each of them, full power and authority to do
and perform  every act and thing  required or necessary to be done,  as fully to
all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person,  hereby
ratifying and confirming all that said  attorneys-in-fact  and agents, or any of
them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  undersigned  have signed these presents this
24th day of February, 1999.

/s/ E. Linn Draper, Jr.                     /s/ James J. Markowsky
    E. Linn Draper, Jr.                         James J. Markowsky


/s/ Henry W. Fayne                          /s/ Armando A. Pena
    Henry W. Fayne                              Armando A. Pena


/s/ Wm. J. Lhota                            /s/ J. H. Vipperman
    Wm. J. Lhota                                J. H. Vipperman
Exhibit 99.1


Independent Auditors' Report


The Board of Directors
QVC, Inc.:

We have audited the consolidated  balance sheet of QVC, Inc. and subsidiaries as
of December 31, 1995,  and the related  consolidated  statements of  operations,
shareholders'  equity and cash flows for the eleven-month  period ended December
31, 1995 (such consolidated  financial  statements are not separately  presented
herein).  These consolidated  financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's  management.  Our  responsibility  is to  express  an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards  require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance   about  whether  the  financial   statements  are  free  of  material
misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes
assessing the  accounting  principles  used and  significant  estimates  made by
management,  as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated  financial statements referred to above present
fairly,  in all  material  respects,  the  financial  position of QVC,  Inc. and
subsidiaries  as of December 31, 1995,  and the results of their  operations and
their cash flows for the  eleven-month  period then ended,  in  conformity  with
generally accepted accounting principles.


/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 2, 1996
Editorial Note on Part 393
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 393 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 393.22 Combination of lighting devices and reflectors. ( a ) *Permitted combinations.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, two or more lighting devices and reflectors (whether or not required by the rules in this part) may be combined optically if— ( 1 ) Each required lighting device and reflector conforms to the applicable rules in this part; and
( 2 ) Neither the mounting nor the use of a nonrequired lighting device or reflector impairs the effectiveness of a required lighting device or reflector or causes that device or reflector to be inconsistent with the applicable rules in this part.
( b ) *Prohibited combinations.* ( 1 ) A turn signal lamp must not be combined optically with either a head lamp or other lighting device or combination of lighting devices that produces a greater intensity of light than the turn signal lamp.
( 2 ) A turn signal lamp must not be combined optically with a stop lamp unless the stop lamp function is always deactivated when the turn signal function is activated.
( 3 ) A clearance lamp must not be combined optically with a tail lamp or identification lamp.
[39 FR 26908, July 24, 1974]
#### Nathan P. Pond, as Assignee, etc., Respondent, v. Chauncey C. Starkweather and others, Appellants.

Judgment and order affirmed. Opinion by

Barker, J.;

Smith, P. J., taking . no part.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2313 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2313

 To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to expand the scope of 
             services provided to veterans in Vet Centers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 1995

   Mr. Smith of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to expand the scope of 
             services provided to veterans in Vet Centers.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES PROVIDED IN VET CENTERS.

    (a) Expansion of Services.--Section 1712A of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1), by inserting ``and, to the extent 
        otherwise authorized by law, may furnish such additional needed 
        services as described in subsection (i)'' in the first sentence 
        after ``life''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsections:
    ``(h) The Secretary may, to the extent resources and facilities are 
available, furnish to any veteran who served in combat during World War 
II or the Korean conflict counseling in a center to assist such veteran 
in overcoming the effects of the veteran's combat experience.
    ``(i) In operating centers under this section, the Secretary may 
provide (1) preventive health care services, (2) medical services 
reasonably necessary in preparation for hospital admission, and (3) 
referral services to assist in obtaining specialized care. The 
Secretary shall provide such services through such health care 
personnel as the Secretary determines appropriate.''.
    (b) Report.--Not later than one year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on 
Veterans' Affairs of the Senate and House of Representatives a report 
relating to the implementation of the amendments made by subsection 
(a). The report shall include the following:
            (1) The number of veterans provided services described in 
        section 1712A(i) of title 38, United States Code, as added by 
        subsection (a).
            (2) The number of centers which provided services described 
        in that section.
            (3) An assessment of the effect providing such services has 
        had on access to and timeliness of service delivery.
                                 <all>
```