alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Helicopter Raid in Northern Syria Targets Senior ISIS Leader

/ Published April 17, 2023

Apr. 17, 2023

Release Number 20230417-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla.**– U.S. Central Command forces conducted a unilateral helicopter raid in northern Syria in the early morning of April 17th targeting a Senior ISIS Syria Leader and Operational Planner responsible for planning terror attacks in the Middle East and Europe. The raid resulted in the probable death of the targeted individual. Two other armed individuals were killed on the target.   

Extensive planning went into this operation to ensure its successful execution. No U.S. troops were wounded. No U.S. helicopters were damaged. We assess no civilians were killed or injured.

"Though degraded, ISIS remains able to conduct operations within the region with a desire to strike beyond the Middle East," said General Michael "Erik" Kurilla, CENTCOM commander. "We will continue the relentless campaign against ISIS."

"This operation reaffirms CENTCOM's steadfast commitment to the region and the enduring defeat of ISIS," said Joe Buccino, a CENTCOM spokesman. "We will provide additional details soon."

-30-
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7755

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMES WARD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, 

District Judge. (1:12-cr-00083-MR-DLH-1; 1:15-cv-00161-MR)

Submitted: May 18, 2016 Decided: May 20, 2016

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Ward, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard Ascik, Richard Lee 

Edwards, Assistant United States Attorneys, David A. Thorneloe, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James Ward seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion as untimely filed. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Ward has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
# CENTCOM Commander Lauds Iraq’s Repatriation of al-Hol Residents

/ Published Jan. 18, 2023

Jan. 18, 2023

Release Number 20230118-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla.**– On Jan. 14, 142 Iraqi families comprising 580 people formerly residing at the al-Hol camp for displaced persons in northeast Syria were escorted by Iraqi officials to the Jeddah-1rehabilitation center. This is part of an ongoing Iraqi government and international effort to repatriate, rehabilitate and reintegrate more than 25,000 Iraqi al-Hol residents.

“We commend the Iraqi government for its constructive and courageous role in this past week’s repatriation operation,” said Gen. Michael “Erik” Kurilla, CENTCOM commander. “Along with our partners in the Syrian Democratic Forces, we will pursue similar opportunities to reduce the population at the al-Hol camp, thus averting ISIS efforts to exploit conditions at the camp.

 “The al-Hol camp has long served as a flashpoint of human suffering and a recruiting opportunity for ISIS. That is why repatriation, rehabilitation and reintegration of these residents is so critical for Iraq, for the region and for the enduring defeat of ISIS.”

-30-
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 252 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                       October 5, 2001.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2883) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2002 for 
intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the United States 
Government, the Community Management Account, and the Central Intelligence 
Agency Retirement and Disability System, and for other purposes. The first 
reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. Points of order against 
consideration of the bill for failure to comply with clause 3(c) of rule XIII 
are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed 
one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. After general debate 
the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall 
be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under 
the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by 
the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence now printed in the bill. The 
committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered by title 
rather than by section. Each title shall be considered as read. Points of order 
against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute for failure to 
comply with clause 7 of rule XVI are waived. No amendment to the committee 
amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed 
in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 
8 of rule XVIII and except pro forma amendments for the purpose of debate. Each 
amendment so printed may be offered only by the Member who caused it to be 
printed or his designee and shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 
bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may 
demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of 
the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a 
substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 
amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion 
to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
From: Ian Farrell [mailto:farrell53@charter.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 12:07 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Lifetime Income RFI

Lifetime Income RFI:

 

I would like to give my support to the choice of lifetime annuities as a rollover 

option to 401K retirement plans. The opportunity to invest 401K savings into an 

annuity option would reduce some of the risk of investing in stocks, bonds or 

mutual funds and could provide a guaranteed income for the rest of one's life.

 

An annuity option would certainly bring more peace of mind and overall less 

worry about providing a revenue of income during one's retirement years. 

Annuity plans with a guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit are an especially 

good option.

 

Thank you for considering this annuity option and possibly requiring employers to 

offer this option in the future (hopefully near future!)

 

Sincerely,

 

Ian R. Farrell
From: Joanne Fendell [mailto:joanne.fendell@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 10:31 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 Annuitization of 401(k) plans

I believe that making the purchase of annuities the default distribution option for 401(k) 

plans would reduce participation in 401(k) plans as well as drive up the cost to administer 

them. I know that I would reduce my contribution to my 401(k) plan to the amount that 

my employer matches, and save the rest, foregoing the ability to defer about $15,000. 

 

If I wanted an annuity, I would buy one. I did buy a variable annuity for about $150K a 

couple of years ago. Fortunately, I left it in money market equivalents and did not take a 

hit when the market declined last year. 

 

As one who has a substantial share of her retirement savings in Roth IRAs, there are few 

advantages to annuities for me. The only way that annuities could be sold is if a certain 

income was guaranteed, given participation for a certain length of time. 401(k)s were 

sold as a flexible option. A "do-it-yourself" annuity is possible for a person who is 

disciplined by withdrawing so much from their retirement account annually or monthly. 

 

For many people, their 401(k) balances may be far too low to make an annuity a 

significant stream of income. Suppose that someone retires with $100K in their 401(k). 

The annuity would provide an income of about $600 a month at age 65 at an interest rate 

of 3.75%. Shown this, people might well think that there is no point to saving for 

retirement, and that they are on the "work until you die" plan. 

 

Sincerely yours, 

 

Joanne Fendell, P.E.
U.S. supports FATA road building in Pakistan
 By None  , US Embassy - Pakistan
  ISLAMABAD (February 18, 2010) — The United States is financing the construction of the important Tank - Makeen road through the FATA Secretariat under the December 31, 2009 Implementation letter pledging USAID infrastructure support in South Waziristan.  When complete, it will provide lifelines for development activities and commerce for people living in the FATA.The Tank - Makeen road is being constructed under the supervision of the FATA Secretariat by the Frontier Works Organization.  Work began on February 1."The U.S. is working with the many elements of the Pakistan Government to deliver much needed infrastructure and services to the people in the FATA," said Ambassador Robin Raphel, Coordinator for Economic and Development Assistance, "We want to move quickly, so people can use the road for transportation and much needed commerce."   The United States is the largest foreign humanitarian assistance contributor in the FATA, having pledged Rs. 63.75 billion ($750 million) over five years to support infrastructure, health, education, job creation, and other important initiatives.  The U.S. is also providing training, commodities, and infrastructure to support border security, civilian law enforcement, and counternarcotics projects in the FATA.
1... See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-209-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.B.R., A CHILD

----------

FROM THE 322 DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY ND

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT 1

----------

We have considered “Appellants’ Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” It is the

court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellants, for which let execution

issue. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL B: LIVINGSTON, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED: June 5, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of Comarco, Inc. I, Thomas
A. Franza, Chief Executive Officer of Comarco, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | This annual report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Comarco, Inc.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |                                         
|------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: May 11, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    THOMAS A. FRANZA                 
|                   |  |  |  | Thomas A. Franza Chief Executive Officer



A signed original copy
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 89.15 Regulations and supporting documentation. ( a ) Each officer to whom authority is delegated under § 89.5 may promulgate regulations for the exercise of that authority within his or her organization. These regulations shall be revised, as necessary, to conform to any amendments to this part.
( b ) Each officer to whom authority is delegated under 89.5 shall furnish the following information to the Assistant Secretary for Administration and the Assistant Secretary for Budget and Programs: ( 1 ) A copy of each redelegation of that authority.
( 2 ) A copy of any implementing regulations governing the exercise of the authority delegated under § 89.5, and any amendments to those regulations.
( c ) Each officer or employee to whom the Secretary's authority has been delegated or redelegated, before exercising such authority, shall acquire sufficient documentation to demonstrate that the action taken is in the best interests of the United States. This documentation will be retained with and treated as part of the file concerning the debt.
( d ) The failure of any officer or employee to comply with this section does not limit or impair his or her exercise of authority.
[53 FR 51238, Dec. 21, 1988, as amended at 73 FR 57269, Oct. 2, 2008]
Exhibit 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Hampton's Luxury Homes, Inc..
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Roy Dalene, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
         of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Roy Dalene
Roy Dalene
Chief Executive Officer
June 9, 2005
-----Original Message-----

From: Emeric DuQuesnay [mailto:Emericoffice@cox.net] 

Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 3:18 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: DOL Fiduciary rule

After careful consideration I believe this change unnecessary & will result in increased cost to the 

consumer negatively impacting their ability to save for retirement. 

Sent from my iPhone
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA Parallel Rendering Algorithm for MIMD ArchitecturesApplications such as animation and scientific visualization demand high performance rendering of complex three dimensional scenes. To deliver the necessary rendering rates, highly parallel hardware architectures are required. The challenge is then to design algorithms and software which effectively use the hardware parallelism. A rendering algorithm targeted to distributed memory MIMD architectures is described. For maximum performance, the algorithm exploits both object-level and pixel-level parallelism. The behavior of the algorithm is examined both analytically and experimentally. Its performance for large numbers of processors is found to be limited primarily by communication overheads. An experimental implementation for the Intel iPSC/860 shows increasing performance from 1 to 128 processors across a wide range of scene complexities. It is shown that minimal modifications to the algorithm will adapt it for use on shared memory architectures as well.Document ID19910017453Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsCrockett, Thomas W.*(Institute for Computer Applications in Science and Engineering Hampton, VA., United States)*Orloff, Tobias*(Great Northwestern Graphics Minneapolis, MN., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1991Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:187571ICASE-91-3NASA-CR-187571AD-A237743Accession Number91N26767Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-18605PROJECT: RTOP 505-90-52-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910017453.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 31-3



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) OF THE

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



I,
John W. Rowe, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Exelon Generation Company, LLC; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                       
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Date: February 18, 2009 |  | /s/    JOHN W.
ROWE                   
|                        |  | Chairman (Principal Executive Officer)



61
From: Drummer, M. Michael [mailto:drummerm@cod.edu] 

Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 9:57 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Lifetime Income RFI

Good Day, 

Annuities have these draw backs for me: 

1) The costs are enormous in general; 

2) The money is inaccessible for emergencies; 

3) The money becomes unavailable for heirs; 

4) Your income depends on the health of one insurance company. 

Best regards, 

Mike Drummer 

West Chicago,IL
#### Thomas C. Poole, Respondent, v. The Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, Appellant.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs.
LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION FEL
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS é ow IAs of: February 12, 2010

‘https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=...

4

Received: February 11, 2010
BRANCH Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION [resist roan 22570
Comments Due: May 03, 2010)
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0006
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants & Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Comment On: IRS-2010-0006-0001
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Document: IRS-2010-0006-0020
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-02028

Untnows4 — Submitter Information

Address:
Bethesda, MD,

General Comment

Speaking for my own personal situation (about to retire with very small pension plus Social
Security, but with savings with which I could purchase an annuity), I have not considered an
annuity for 2 main reasons: (1) high commission/administrative costs and (2) no guarantee. I
view annuities as a great source of income for brokers and financial institutions but not a product
that provides a fair return on investment to consumers. If the Federal government would offer a
guaranteed annuity (or provide FDIC-type protection) with reasonable commission and
administrative costs, 1 would very likely participate. Inflation protection would be an additional
incentive.

Since there are millions of Americans approaching retirement age with no pension and no good,
safe place to earn returns on any savings that they do have, a government protected and/or
managed annuity would be a great supplement for SS and provide an incentive to people to save
for retirement.

Page 1 of 1

2/12/2010
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00705-CV

N. N. and C. P., Appellants

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 353RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-FM-19-008360, THE HONORABLE CLEVE WESTON DOTY, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant C.P. has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss her appeal. We grant 

the motion and dismiss the appeal as to C.P. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). We direct the Clerk 

of this Court to restyle the caption of the instant appeal as follows:

N.N., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

It is ordered on January 6, 2023.

Before Justices Baker, Kelly, and Smith