alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 663.25 Pre-award Buy America certification. For purposes of this part, a pre-award Buy America certification is a certification that the recipient keeps on file that— ( a ) There is a letter from FTA which grants a waiver to the rolling stock to be purchased from the Buy America requirements under section 165(b)(1), (b)(2), or (b)(4) of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982, as amended; or
( b ) The recipient is satisfied that the rolling stock to be purchased meets the requirements of section 165(a) or (b)(3) of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982, as amended, after having reviewed itself or through an audit prepared by someone other than the manufacturer or its agent documentation provided by the manufacturer which lists— ( 1 ) Component and subcomponent parts of the rolling stock to be purchased identified by manufacturer of the parts, their country of origin and costs; and
( 2 ) The location of the final assembly point for the rolling stock, including a description of the activities that will take place at the final assembly point and the cost of final assembly.
#### § 674.1 Purpose.

This part carries out the mandate of 49 U.S.C. 5329(e) for State safety oversight of rail fixed guideway public transportation systems.
H. Res. 527

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 19, 2002.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order to consider in the House the resolution (H.

Res. 524) expressing the sense of the House that Congress

should complete action on the Permanent Death Tax Repeal

Act of 2002, and for consideration of the resolution. The resolution shall be considered as read for amendment. The resolution shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of

the Committee on Ways and Means. The previous question

shall be considered as ordered on the resolution to final adoption without intervening motion.

SEC. 2. Upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be

in order to consider in the House the resolution (H. Res.

525) expressing the sense of the House of Representatives

that the 107th Congress should complete action on and

present to the President, before September 30, 2002, legislation extending and strengthening the successful 1996 welfare

reforms. The resolution shall be considered as read for
2

•HRES 527 EH

amendment. The resolution shall be debatable for one hour

equally divided among and controlled by the chairmen and

ranking minority members of the Committees on Ways and

Means and Education and the Workforce. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the resolution to final

adoption without intervening motion.

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 599.516 Collection of assessed or compromised civil penalties. ( a ) Payment of a civil penalty, whether assessed or compromised, shall be made by check, postal money order, or electronic transfer of funds, as provided in instructions by the agency. A payment of civil penalties shall not be considered a request for a hearing.
( b ) The party must remit payment of any assessed civil penalty to NHTSA within 30 days after receipt of the Hearing Officer's order assessing civil penalties or, in the case of an appeal to the Administrator, within 30 days after receipt of the Administrator's decision on the appeal. Failure to make timely payment may result in the institution of appropriate action under the Federal Claims Collection Act, as amended, the regulations issued thereunder, and other applicable law.
( c ) The party must remit payment of any compromised civil penalty to NHTSA on the date and under such terms and conditions as agreed to by the party and NHTSA. Failure to pay a compromised civil penalty to NHTSA on the date and under such terms and conditions as agreed to by the party and NHTSA may either result in the institution of appropriate action under the Federal Claims Collection Act, as amended, the regulations issued thereunder, and other applicable law, or NHTSA entering a finding of violation by default and assessing a civil penalty in the amount proposed in the Notice of Violation without processing the violation under the hearing procedures set forth in this part.
From: Crystal Selby

To: E-OHPSCA1251.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB42

Date: Thursday, June 17, 2010 7:21:06 PM

Hello,

Request comment on whether changes to benefit program cost sharing as a result of

Mental Health Parity testing will cause a group to lose grandfathered status. 

Example: Employer A has a $20 office copay and a $20 copay for outpatient mental

health.

 Insurer testing for parity disqualified this arrangement; and plan only

passes testing by changing the outpatient mental health copay to deductible/coinsurance.

The dollar or % impact of this change is immeasurable since it now varies based on

number of visits and whether the deductible has been met or not at the time of visit.

Insurer is unilaterally changing all of their fully insured plans 7/1 to accommodate the

Mental Health Parity requirement.

Thank you,

Crystal Selby

Propel Insurance

 Account Executive

 Employee Benefits

 925 Fourth Avenue, Suite 3200

 Seattle, WA 98104-1159

 206.676.4230 Direct

 206.652.1442 Fax

 www.propelinsurance.com

mail.propelinsurance.com made the following annotations

---------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTICE: This communication including any attachments may contain privileged or

confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, or believe that you

received this communication in error, please advise the sender immediately and

delete or destroy the communication you received without copying or disclosing the

contents. Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.50

                               SECOND AMENDMENT TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


       THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the
"Second Amendment") is made and entered into as of January 12, 1998, by and
between COMNET Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("Company") and Robert S.
Bowen, a Maryland resident (Employee").

       WHEREAS, Company and Employee entered into that certain Amended Restated
Employment Agreement dated as of January 28, 1992, and the First Amendment
thereto, dated August 15, 1997 (the "Agreement"), regarding various terms and
conditions of employment of Employee with respect to Company; and

       WHEREAS, Company and Employee wish to amend the Agreement, but only with
respect to the terms set out herein; and

       WHEREAS, Company and Employee are mutually desirous that such
satisfactory employment relationship should continue under the terms and
conditions of the Agreement, as amended.

       NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises contained herein, and
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, Company and Employee intending to be legally bound hereby
agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

       1. Section 4 of the Agreement is hereby modified to include the following
new Subsection (d):

            d.    Notwithstanding the provisions set out in Section 4(a), above,
Bowen shall be entitled to a base salary of Three Hundred and Forty Thousand,
One Hundred Four Dollars ($340,104), as the base salary identified in Section
4(a), above, as adjusted pursuant to Section 4(b), above. This salary level
shall take effect from the effective date of this Second Amendment, as Bowen has
determined in his sole discretion that the financial performance of the Company
has materially improved and Bowen has so notified the Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors of the Company.

       2. Group 1 and Bowen hereby affirm that the Agreement, as amended hereby,
remains in full force and effect, and is not further modified hereby.

<PAGE>   2

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this First
Amendment as of the date first written above.

                                    COMNET Corporation



                                     By:  [SIG]    
                                       ------------------------

                                    Its: Chief Financial Officer
                                       ------------------------

                                        /s/ROBERT S. BOWEN
                                    ----------------------------
                                    Robert S. Bowen, Individually
## O.toole. Catherine (OST) Subject: Docket 05T-2013-0105/0106 Western Global Airlines

From: O'toole, Catherine (OST) 

### Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 11:39 AM To: Atwood, Mark (MAtwood@cozen.com) 

### Subject: compliance question Hi Mark One question came up regarding Western Global's compliance regarding accidents and incidents. We require a5year history of operation and while I realize that WG isnew and therefore doesn't have any accidents or incidents inthe past 5years, Ijust need you to confirm that for WG key personnel. (Originally you had one year in the application, not 5). Thanks. Once we have this Iam hopeful we will be all set. Katy O'Toole U,S. Department ofTransportation Office ofAviation Analysis Air Carrier Fitness Division (X-56) phone: 202.366.9998 fax: 202.366 7638 Catherine. O'Toole@dot.gov

1
Strafford,

Dec., 1899.

#### Hall, *Ap't, v.*Hall *& a.*

A widow is not entitled to dower in land to which her husband had a right of conveyance, and which after Ms decease was purchased by the administrator for the benefit of the estate.

Probate Appeal. Facts agreed. The plaintiff, widow of Dyer P. Hall, was married to him August 15, 1883. Before the marriage Dyer gave a note for $1,450 and a deed of a tract of land to Deborah Felker, who, at the same time, gave him a bond to re-convey upon payment of the note. Dyer continued in possession of the land until his death. His administrator paid the note, and thereupon Deborah conveyed the land to him for the benefit of the estate. The plaintiff claims clower in the land.

*Worcester, Gafney Snow,*for the plaintiff.

*George E. Cochrane*and *John Kivel,*for the defendants.

Peaslee, J.

The deed to Deborah Felker, being accompanied by a secret trust, was voidable as to the grantor’s creditors *(Stratton*v. *Putney,*63 N. H. 577); but as between the parties it was a valid contract. *Esty*v. *Long,*41 N. H. 103. The parties intended that the deed and bond should operate only as security. While no other inference can be drawn from their acts, yet the transaction cannot be treated as a mortgage because of the prohibition of the statute. P. S., *c.*139, *ss.*1, 2; *Tifft v. Walker,*10 N. H. 150; *Gordon*v. *Gordon,*54 N. H. 152. Hall had a right to a conveyance upon the performance of certain conditions. This right having been created simultaneously with the grant, the grantee acquired no such seizin as would support a dower right as against Hall. *Hunkins*v. *Hunkins,*65 N. H. 95, *99; Hallett*v. *Parker,*69 N. H. 134. On the other hand, Hall had not sufficient interest to support such a title in his widow. Conceding that it is the law that the holder of an equitable title has sufficient seizin to support a claim of dower (compare 1 Per. Tr., *s.*324, 1 Wash. R. P. 202 *et seq.,*4 Kent 45, with *Hopkinson*v. *Dumas,*42 N. H. 296, 306), it cannot avail this plaintiff. The equitable title required for this purpose is a present right to enforce in a court of equity a demand either for a legal title or for the beneficial use of the property. *Pugh*v. *Bell,*2 T. B. Mon. 125,—15 Am. Dec. 142; 1 Per. Tr., s. 324. This is more than Hall possessed. He had only a right to *48obtain title upon performing the condition of the bond. He owned an executory contract, but neither a legal nor equitable title to the real estate. If the condition had not been performed, Deborah’s, title would have been complete without foreclosure or further conveyance. The bond was personal property; and the fact that the administrator converted it into real estate, instead of selling it, does not change the nature of the estate in his hands. *Vandewalker*v. Rollins, 63 N. H. 460, 464.

*Appeal dismissed.*

All concurred.
Exhibit 32.1
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brigham Exploration Company
(the"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ben
M.Brigham, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated: August 13, 2004        /s/  Bud  M.  Brigham
                              --------------------------------------------------
                              Bud  M.  Brigham
                              Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of
                              the  Board


     This certification shall not be deemed to be "filed" for the purpose of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be
incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as
being incorporated therein by reference.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Brigham
Exploration Company and will be retained by Brigham Exploration Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 6/23/14 10:28 AM

Received: June 10, 2014

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jy-8cl1-weps

Comments Due: July 03, 2014

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0053

Target Date Disclosure

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0053-0003

Target Date Disclosure

Document: EBSA-2010-0053-DRAFT-0011

Comment on FR Doc # 2014-12667

Submitter Information

Name: Anthony Agbay

Address: 

Troy, MI, 48098

General Comment

I believe the concept of the Committee's recommendations, including the development of a 

glide path illustration based on a standardized measure of fund risk seems quite reasonable. 

However, I caution the Committee to consider the varying scopes of risk associated with Target 

Date Funds within the same target year (ie: 2015, 2025, etc). Because of the “to” and “through” 

retirement glide paths, investors could be mislead about risk depending on which target date 

glide path has been elected.

For instance, comparing a single risk metric that covers both “to” and “through” styles would be 

inconsistent and ill-advised. More than likely it would add to greater confusion than clarity. I 

recommend a single metric for each style so it would create a standardized approach among 

both asset classes. 

For example, “to” retirement TDFs tend to be more conservative at age 65 with some strategies 

having as little as 25% exposure to stocks. Conversely, “through” retirement TDFs tend to me 

more aggressive at retirement with some strategies having nearly 60% in stocks at age 65. 

These differences are magnified by losses in 2008 of 2010 TDFs; according to Morningstar, the 

losses ranged from -9.07% to -41.17%. 

As you can see, comparing these strategies with one standardized metric would not be 

beneficial. Just as we wouldn’t have a standardized measure of risk to compare bonds and 

stocks, we too should not have one to compare “to” and “through” TDFs – particularly when 

Page 1 of 2

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=090000648173541e&format=xml&show... 6/23/2014
some act more as bonds while others act more as stocks.

Anthony Agbay

The Agbay Group

Troy, MI

Page 2 of 2

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=090000648173541e&format=xml&show... 6/23/2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO IT.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-START>                         SEP-04-1995
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-01-1996
<CASH>                                   9,743,024
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                           27,097,106
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                             17,323,179
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        58,395,828
<PP&E>                                   8,117,040
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          73,164,882
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   11,300,508
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                 1,828,179
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            73,164,882
<SALES>                                146,561,416
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       146,561,416
<CGS>                                  108,814,265
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          144,847,498
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       1,811,747
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          1,713,918
<INCOME-TAX>                               776,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               937,918
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0
        


</TABLE>
From: joelucarelli [mailto:joelucarelli@comcast.net] 

Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2015 12:02 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: New Fiduciary Rule

As an independent broker/advisor, at time of introduction, I tell each & every client that I have 

no obligation to any one company; but, instead, only to find the best product that best serves the 

client's needs.

I don't need a law to understand my responsibility to my clients.

Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S® 5, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
20 Years of Peace
 By None  , CENTCOM Public Affairs
  AL QAROH ISLAND, Kuwait (Jan. 26, 2011)**–**At the request of the government of Kuwait, the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) provided personnel and Naval aviation support to the reenactment of the liberation of Al Qaroh Island, Tuesday, off the coast of Kuwait. American personnel, along with MH-60 Desert Hawk helicopters, supported the Kuwaiti navy and special operations forces in the re-enactment, which is the first event in a month-long series of celebrations honoring the 20th anniversary of the liberation of Kuwait. As part of this series of events, which commemorate Kuwait’s liberation and sovereignty, CENTCOM joins the Kuwaiti people in celebrating the shared values of freedom and stability throughout the region. “It is with great satisfaction that I can join in celebrating a free and independent Kuwait on this noteworthy anniversary,” said Gen. James N. Mattis, Commander, CENTCOM.  “As a nation that has known the scourge and endured the indignity of an aggressive, senseless invasion, Kuwait stands today as an international reminder that good nations standing together are more than a counter against malign influences. Having fought alongside Kuwaiti Soldiers who served in my U.S. Marine infantry battalion during the liberation of Kuwait in 1991, I convey personally and professionally the respect of the U.S. Military for this valiant country,” he said. Central Command has an enduring commitment to our allies and partners in the region to advance stability, security, prosperity, and peace. In times of peace and crisis, CENTCOM stands ready to assist, respond and defeat aggression which threatens the stability of the region. For additional information concerning CENTCOM’s participation in upcoming celebratory events in Kuwait, please contact the U.S. Army Central Command Public Affairs Office at 404-464-4695/2608 Georgia or 011-965-9907-9883/6659 Kuwait.
#### S. Gregory Doran and Elizabeth R. Thompson, Respondents, v. Theodore G. Metzger, Appellant.

Order denying motion to change place of trial affirmed. No costs.
###### Editorial Note on Part 587

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 587 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 587.16 Adhesive bonding procedure.

Immediately before bonding, aluminum sheet surfaces to be bonded are thoroughly cleaned using a suitable solvent, such as 1-1-1 Trichloroethane. This is carried out at least twice and more often if required to eliminate grease or dirt deposits. The cleaned surfaces are abraded using 120 grit abrasive paper. Metallic/silicon carbide abrasive paper is not to be used. The surfaces are thoroughly abraded and the abrasive paper changed regularly during the process to avoid clogging, which could lead to a polishing effect. Following abrading, the surfaces are thoroughly cleaned again, as above. In total, the surfaces are solvent-cleaned at least four times. All dust and deposits left as a result of the abrading process are removed, as these can adversely affect bonding. The adhesive is applied to one surface only, using a ribbed rubber roller. In cases where honeycomb is to be bonded to aluminum sheet, the adhesive is applied to the aluminum sheet only. A maximum pressure of 0.5 kg/m2 (11.9 lb/ft2) is applied evenly over the surface, giving a maximum film thickness of 0.5 mm (0.02 in).
#### § 71.3 Atlantic zone.

The first zone, the Atlantic standard time zone, includes that part of the United States that is between 52°30′′ W. longitude and 67°30′′ W. longitude and that part of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico that is west of 67°30′′ W. longitude, but does not include any part of the State of Maine.
From: Doug Childers [mailto:dchilders@gvtc.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 4:48 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

Keep your stupid government hands off of personal retirement accounts! You idiots could not find 

your way out of a paper bag, so how do you think you could make better decisions on personal 

retirement accounts.

 

 

Douglas W. Childers
H. Res. 107

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 29, 2001.

Resolved, That the House has heard with profound sorrow of the death of the Honorable Norman Sisisky, a Representative from the Commonwealth of Virginia.

Resolved, That a committee of such Members of the

House as the Speaker may designate, together with such

Members of the Senate as may be joined, be appointed to attend the funeral.

Resolved, That the Sergeant at Arms of the House be

authorized and directed to take such steps as may be necessary for carrying out the provisions of these resolutions and

that the necessary expenses in connection therewith be paid

out of applicable accounts of the House.

Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions

to the Senate and transmit a copy thereof to the family of

the deceased.
2

•HRES 107 EH

Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a further mark of respect to the memory of the deceased.

Attest:

Clerk.