alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 11 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 11

  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that oversight 
    hearings should be held immediately to determine the causes and 
     outcomes surrounding this influenza season's vaccine shortage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2001

 Mr. Condit submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that oversight 
    hearings should be held immediately to determine the causes and 
     outcomes surrounding this influenza season's vaccine shortage.

Whereas the United States has been faced with a shortage of influenza vaccine 
        from manufacturers during this influenza season;
Whereas influenza vaccine is the best preventative measure against influenza;
Whereas the most at risk populations were not immunized at the optimal time 
        (early October), as recommended by health officials;
Whereas influenza seasons are unpredictable and can be devastating to the health 
        and well-being of all populations, regardless of age;
Whereas all influenza vaccines are privately manufactured;
Whereas opportunity exists for distributors of influenza vaccine to reap large 
        profits in times of shortage by servicing the highest bidder before 
        their contractual agreements or those most in need;
Whereas the State of California contracted with General Injectables and Vaccines 
        on February 24, 2000, for 700,000 doses of influenza vaccine at $17.99 
        per vial with expectations of receiving its entire shipment by September 
        15, 2000, but did not receive the balance until the end of November 
        2000;
Whereas the State of Maine contracted with General Injectables and Vaccines in 
        late June 2000 for 123,000 doses of influenza vaccine at $31.00 and 
        $39.00 per vial and received its entire order by early September 2000; 
        and
Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has implored distributors 
        of influenza vaccine to send their product to those most in need per CDC 
        guidelines: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
oversight hearings should be convened immediately to determine--
            (1) the course of action followed by distributors of 
        influenza vaccine during this influenza season;
            (2) whether or not such distributors put profit ahead of 
        the health and well-being of the American people; and
            (3) whether it is necessary to take measures to ensure the 
        safe, adequate, and timely supply of influenza vaccines in the 
        future.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATE OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, Anthony K. Chan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of
Pacific Systems Control Technology, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: November 14, 2002



/s/ ANTHONY K. CHANAnthony K. Chan
Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer

---
# June 25: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL Terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published June 25, 2015

June 25, 2015

Release # 20150625FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**SOUTHWEST ASIA –** Coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq June 24. In Syria, coalition military forces conducted three airstrikes using fighter and remotely piloted aircraft. Separately in Iraq, coalition military forces conducted 13 airstrikes approved by the Iraqi Ministry of Defense using attack, bomber, fighter and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL terrorists.

“Coalition aircrew legerity underpins the success of the air campaign,” said Brig. Gen. Thomas Weidley, CJTF-OIR chief of staff. “Their contributions each and every day to this fight cannot be overstated.”

The following is a summary of the strikes conducted since the last press release:

**Syria**

         Near Al Hasakah, one airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit, destroying an ISIL vehicle.

         Near Aleppo, one airstrike struck an ISIL tank.

         Near Tal Abyad, one airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit, destroying two ISIL fighting positions and an ISIL vehicle.

**Iraq**

         Near Baghdadi, one airstrike destroyed an ISIL road.

         Near Bayji, two airstrikes struck two ISIL tactical units, destroying two ISIL vehicles and an ISIL structure.

         Near Fallujah, one airstrike struck an ISIL bunker.

         Near Mosul, three airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit, an ISIL fighting position and land features denying ISIL a tactical advantage, destroying an ISIL vehicle.

         Near Ramadi, three airstrikes struck two ISIL staging areas, destroying two ISIL vehicles.

         Near Tal Afar, three airstrikes struck two ISIL staging areas and an ISIL mortar firing position.

Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely.

The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria, the region and the wider international community. The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Iraq include Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Syria include Bahrain, Canada, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and the U.S.
From: James Courtney [mailto:jimcourtney2@verizon.net] 

Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 7:31 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Government control of 401k and IRAs

This is a stupid idea, even for Obama. I totally object to the idea of the 

government interfering with our retirements under the guise of ‘protecting’ the 

people. History has shown that what the people need protection from IS 

government. Keep your hands out of our retirement plans.

 

best regards,

Jim Courtney 

433 Troy Drive 

Blandon, PA 19510 

610-944-0681 

jimcourtney2@verizon.net
#### § 701.12 Other rights and services.

Nothing in this part shall be construed as entitling any person, as of right, to any service or the disclosure of any record to which such person is not entitled under the FOIA.
#### § 71.11 Alaska zone.

The sixth zone, the Alaska standard time zone, includes the entire State of Alaska, except as provided in § 71.12 of this title.

(Act of March 19, 1918, as amended by the Uniform Time Act of 1966 and Pub. L. 97-449, 15 U.S.C. 260-264; 49 CFR 1.59(a)).

[Amdt. 71-19, 48 FR 43281, Sept. 22, 1983, as amended by Amdt. 71-20, 48 FR 55289, Dec. 12, 1983]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Thomas O’Loughlin, Appellant.

Judgment and conviction affirmed. Opinion

*Per Curiam.*
NATIONAL John H Dane
pn Hickenloop Gary Herbert n Crippen

GOVERNORS ee oo

ASSOCIATION Cha ice Chai

July 21, 2015

VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION

The Honorable Thomas Perez,

Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor

Office of Regulations and Interpretations,

Employee Benefits Security Administration, Room N-5655
200 Constitution Avenue N.W., Washington, DC 20210

RE: Proposed Conflict-of-Interest Rule to Define “Fiduciary” — RIN 1210-AB32

Dear Secretary Perez:

On behalf of the nation’s governors, I urge the U.S. Department of Labor to extend the public comment
period in this rulemaking matter to allow additional time for the department to consult with the states and
receive their input.

The proposed rule would amend the definition of fiduciary under the Employment Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) regarding who gives investment advice to an ERISA plan or its participants
or beneficiaries. The proposed rule would touch consumers and industries in the states. Without adequate
federal consultation with state leaders to help better understand the myriad of state laws currently in place
to protect consumers, the proposed rule could have unintended consequences.

NGA encourages the department to consult more extensively with state elected and appointed officials,
including insurance regulators, before finalizing the rule. Communication with the states is necessary to

ensure retirement security policy and insurance regulation do not conflict.

Thank you for your time and consideration of this request for an extension of the comment period and more
robust consultation with the states.

Sincerely,

Dan Crippen

Hall of the States * 444 North Capitol Stree Suite 2¢ Washington, D.C. 20001

Telephone (202) 624-5300 & www.nga.¢
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 12:32 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Department of Labor Regulation Proposals re/RIN-1210-AB39

To whom it may concern,

I would like to comment on your proposal for new regulations which are necessary to restore 

the Legal Due Process & Equal Protection rights of disabled employees under the ERISA System.

The system is ridden with Conflict of Interest abuses that inherently corrupt an honest scientific 

outcome for the disabled claimant. Insurance Co. employees, ie., Adjustors are not unbiased,

independent appraisers of the disability determination. They are insurance company employees 

who are paid bonuses and expected to tow the line in favor of the Insurer's bottom line 

protection from liability.

IME doctors hired by the Insurer are not independent medical examiners. They are selectively 

hired and paid extravagant fees, "thousands of dollars" for their allegiance to the Insurer's 

financial interests. 

On the other hand, the disabled party has great difficulty finding an attorney to appeal the 

denied benefits. Personal Injury Disability attorneys reject taking on ERISA Appeal Cases and 

the few that do, have no real incentive

due to the laws that deny them the right to address and penalize Insurer fraud & bad 

faith. ERISA Law grants the Insurers immunity protection from charges of fraud & bad faith. If 

Claimant attorneys are able to reverse the

the Insurer's denial of benefits, they are paid for their legal work by deducting 30 to 40% from 

the benefits of their disabled client. So the disabled party must pay for the Insurer's fraudulent 

denial. 

Little to No Legal Accountability is demanded since ERISA was shifted from the State Civil Due 

Process System to the Federal System, where no protection from Insurance Fraud & Bad Faith 

exists. Where the Disabled are stripped

of their Rights to Due Process & Equal Protection. Where Claimant Attorneys can accept an 

Appeals Case, sit on it for months, then send a letter of resignation from the case with no 

explanations of what occurred, and a suggestion to find another attorney. After experiencing 

this legally irresponsible treatment from two or three Claimant Attorneys you discover that your 

statutes of limitation have expired without any notification from any of these attorneys. 

Last but not least of these lawless insults is the discovery that a fraudulent diagnosis was put 

into your ERISA File at the Department of Labor by the Insurance company. The diagnosis was 

made by the Insurer's hired

Medical Examiner who stated there was no objective evidence of disability and diagnosed a 

Psychosomatic Mental Disorder. The original, legitimate diagnosis is a permanent disabling 

spinal injury called Arachnoiditis.
Thank you for your concern and proposal for new regulations which hopefully will prevent 

further obstructions of the human & civil rights of the permanently Disabled, which I can 

personally attest to.
#### § 599.304 Payment to dealer.

Upon completion of review of an application for reimbursement from a registered dealer that satisfies all the requirements of this part, the agency shall reimburse the dealer, by electronic transfer to the account identified under the process in § 599.200(c) of this part.
# UPDATE: U.S. aircraft crashes in western Iraq

/ Published March 16, 2018

March 16, 2018

Release # 20180316-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**SOUTHWEST ASIA –** At approximately 6:45 p.m. GMT March 15, 2018, a U.S. HH-60 Pave Hawk helicopter crashed in western Iraq. The crash does not appear to be a result of enemy activity. This incident is under investigation.

"All personnel aboard were killed in the crash," said Brig. Gen. Jonathan P. Braga, director of operations, Combined Joint Task Force - Operation Inherent Resolve. "This tragedy reminds us of the risks our men and women face every day in service of our nations. We are thinking of the loved ones of these service members today."

An accompanying U.S. helicopter immediately reported the crash and a quick reaction force comprised of Iraqi Security Forces and Coalition members secured the scene.

"We are grateful to the Iraqi Security Forces for their immediate assistance in response to this tragic incident," Braga said. "Iraqi Security Forces continue to demonstrate their professionalism, capabilities and flexibility as we continue the fight towards a lasting defeat of Daesh."

Names of the fallen will be released by the U.S. Department of Defense after next of kin have been notified.

-30-
§ 611.201 New Starts eligibility. ( a ) To be eligible for an engineering grant under this part for a new fixed guideway or an extension to a fixed guideway, a project must: ( 1 ) Be a New Starts project as defined in § 611.105; and
( 2 ) Be approved into engineering by FTA pursuant to § 611.209.
( b ) To be eligible for a construction grant under section 5309 for a new fixed guideway or extension to a fixed guideway, a project must: ( 1 ) Be a New Starts project as defined in § 611.105;
( 2 ) Have completed engineering;
( 3 ) Receive a “medium” or better rating on project justification pursuant to § 611.203;
( 4 ) Receive a “medium” or better rating on local financial commitment pursuant to § 611.205;
( 5 ) Meet the other requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5309.
Docket: EBSA-2010-0007 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in 

Retirement Plans 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0007-0001 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options 

Document: EBSA-2010-0007-DRAFT-0041 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Address: 

WA, 

General Comment 

I don't believe requiring an annuity distribution option to 401k plans will result in consumer change. I 

have been managing benefits for large employers for more than 20 years. A lifetime annuity was an 

option in a number of the plans I managed; not once has an employee elected the annuity. Employees 

have two primary concerns that stand in the way of purchasing an annuity: (1) insurer insolvency 

(insurer may be stable now but what about 20 years from now?) (2) Desire to leave unused 401k 

balance to beneficiaries. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: March 01, 2010 

Received: February 21, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80aa9735 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=Print&PrintId=0900006480aa97... 3/1/2010
§ 655.71 Retention of records. ( a ) *General requirement.* An employer shall maintain records of its anti-drug and alcohol misuse program as provided in this section. The records shall be maintained in a secure location with controlled access.
( b ) *Period of retention.* In determining compliance with the retention period requirement, each record shall be maintained for the specified minimum period of time as measured from the date of the creation of the record. Each employer shall maintain the records in accordance with the following schedule: ( 1 ) *Five years.* Records of covered employee verified positive drug or alcohol test results, documentation of refusals to take required drug or alcohol tests, and covered employee referrals to the substance abuse professional, and copies of annual MIS reports submitted to FTA.
( 2 ) *Two years.* Records related to the collection process and employee training.
( 3 ) *One year.* Records of negative drug or alcohol test results.
( c ) *Types of records.* The following specific records must be maintained: ( 1 ) Records related to the collection process: ( i ) Collection logbooks, if used.
( ii ) Documents relating to the random selection process.
( iii ) Documents generated in connection with decisions to administer reasonable suspicion drug or alcohol tests.
( iv ) Documents generated in connection with decisions on post-accident drug and alcohol testing.
( v ) MRO documents verifying existence of a medical explanation of the inability of a covered employee to provide an adequate urine or oral fluid or breath sample.
( 2 ) Records related to test results: ( i ) The employer's copy of the custody and control form.
( ii ) Documents related to the refusal of any covered employee to submit to a test required by this part.
( iii ) Documents presented by a covered employee to dispute the result of a test administered under this part.
( 3 ) Records related to referral and return to duty and follow-up testing: Records concerning a covered employee's entry into and completion of the treatment program recommended by the substance abuse professional.
( 4 ) Records related to employee training: ( i ) Training materials on drug use awareness and alcohol misuse, including a copy of the employer's policy on prohibited drug use and alcohol misuse.
( ii ) Names of covered employees attending training on prohibited drug use and alcohol misuse and the dates and times of such training.
( iii ) Documentation of training provided to supervisors for the purpose of qualifying the supervisors to make a determination concerning the need for drug and alcohol testing based on reasonable suspicion.
( iv ) Certification that any training conducted under this part complies with the requirements for such training.
( 5 ) Copies of annual MIS reports submitted to FTA.
[66 FR 42002, Aug. 9, 2001, as amended at 87 FR 27653, May 2, 2023]
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANTS



|Name                           | State of Incorporation
|------------------------------ | ----------------------
|                               |                       
|TNP                            |                       
|                               |                       
|Texas-New Mexico Power Company | Texas                 
|                               |                       
|Facility Works, Inc.           | Texas                 
|                               |                       
|TNP Operating Company          | Texas                 
|                               |                       
|First Choice Power, Inc.       | Texas                 
|                               |                       
|                               |                       
|TNMP                           |                       
|                               |                       
|Texas Generating Company       | Texas                 
|                               |                       
|Texas Generating Company II    | Texas                 
|                               |
SUPREME COURT.

#### Andrew J. Perry, respondent, agt. True W. Rollins, appellant.

*Action hy cm attorney for*services— *Answer—generad denial a/nd an allegation that the servites have been fully paid*for— *Order of reference.*

*It seems*that an order of reference may be had in an action by an attorney for professional services. ,

*Qim'e.*Is *Marlin*agt. *Windsor' Motel Company*(10 *Man,*304) to be followed, or is a different rule to be established?

*First Department, General Term,*

*October,*1878.

This was an appeal from an order made at special term directing a reference to hear and determine the issues.

The action was brought by plaintiff, as an attorney and counselor at law, for professional services rendered for defendant. The defendant’s answer is a general denial of the allegations in the complaint, and alleges that plaintiff rendered certain services for defendant and one Samuel Ward, as trustees for the bondholders of the Gold Valley Mining Company, and that he has been fully paid therefor. The order of reference was made upon the pleadings, the bilí of particulars consisting of about sixty items and an affidavit of plaintiff that the trial of the action would involve the examination of a long account.

*T. C. & Chas. G. Cronin,*for the appellant.

The trial of this action will not involve the examination of a long account. The plaintiff’s bill of particulars is not an account *243proper, in the legal sense of the term *(Dickinson*agt. *Mitchell,*19 *Abb.,*286). Compulsory references are not matters of right, hut of judicial discretion, and the constitutional provision of the right to trial by jury cannot be too faithfully preserved. On the issues in this action, the defendant should have the right of submission to a jury, being for the professional services of a lawyer *(Flanders*agt. *Odell,*16 Abb. [N. S.], 247; *Martin*agt. *Windsor Hotel Co.,*10 *Hun,*304).

*A. J. Perry,*plaintiff in person.

There is no fact in this case which comes within the purview of any of the recent cases where references have been denied.

The account is sufficiently established by the bill of particulars *(Place*agt. *Cheeseborough,*4 *Hun,*577). The bill of particulars contains upwards of sixty items involving labor on at least sixty different days, making a “long account” within, the judicial definition and meaning of that expression ( *Continental Bank Note Co.*agt. *The Industrial Exhibition Co.,*1 *Hun,*118).

*Present,*Davis, *P. J.,*Beady *and*Ingalls, *JJ.*

Order of reference affirmed; *no opinion.*
Exhibit 99.3

Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code

The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Report on Form 10-K of Exelon Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2002, that
(i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Exelon Corporation.

|Date: March 21, 2003 |  | /s/ROBERT S. SHAPARDRobert S. Shapard
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks