alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1210-AB32-2-1141.html[7/24/2015 6:36:45 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvq-kpwf

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1635

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Russell Robison

Address:

1409 Plymouth East Road West

Plymouth, OH, 44865

Email: russell@willard-oh.com

Phone: 419-687-7533

General Comment

I am entirely capable of administering my 401k without interference from any federal agents or appointed

 advisers. Thanks for staying in your office and counting your own beans if there are any left.
#### Alexander M. White and others, Respondents, v. James E. Dutcher, as Sheriff, etc., Appellant.

Order granting new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion By Pratt, J.
#### § 845.15 Payment of witnesses.

Any witness subpoenaed to attend the investigative hearing under this part shall be paid such fees for travel and attendance for which the hearing officer shall certify.
**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Michael H. Owens, M.D., certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-QSB**of iVOW, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this****report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)             Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b)            Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)             Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)             all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)            any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: November 14, 2005

 

 
| /s/ Michael  H. Owens               |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael H.  Owens, M.D.             |   |
| President,  Chief Executive Officer |   |
| and Director                        |   |

 

----
# CENTCOM Launches Tech Residency Program

/ Published Feb. 6, 2024
TAMPA, Fla., 
In January, U.S. Central Command kicked off the "CENTCOM Tech Residency" Program, which creates a pathway for exceptional tech talent to join the Command on a non-permanent basis. The Tech Residency program will run for 90-180 day cycles, allowing technical experts to embed with the Command to solve select technical challenges.

CENTCOM's inaugural Tech Resident is Mr. Egon Rinderer. Mr. Rinderer brings significant technical expertise from his leadership positions across multiple cutting-edge technology companies, including Shift5, Tanium, and Intel Corp. He will focus on a select set of operational challenges related to data integration and enhanced analytics.

"As an organization focused on digital modernization and data-centric operations, we are committed to leveraging diverse technical talent to drive progress at U.S. Central Command. The Tech Residency program will create a repeatable pathway for talented individuals from outside government to contribute to critical missions at the Command, and then carry that experience and perspective back home. By establishing this program, the Command is increasing access to best-in-class technical talent while expanding a community of technical individuals who have a better understanding of our operational problem sets going forward," said Sky Moore, Chief Technology Officer, U.S. Central Command.

"Our strategic approach - summarized by 'People, Partners, and Innovation,' relies on bringing in the best talent from civilian industry and then empowering that talent," said General Michael Erik Kurilla, commander of U.S. Central Command. "Mr. Rinderer brings a wealth of experience from his time in the tech sector and is the perfect candidate to kick off the Tech Residency program. He will help us advance as a data-centric warfighting headquarters to enable our critical missions in the region."
§ 830.6 Information to be given in notification. The notification required in § 830.5 shall contain the following information, if available: ( a ) Type, nationality, and registration marks of the aircraft;
( b ) Name of owner, and operator of the aircraft;
( c ) Name of the pilot-in-command;
( d ) Date and time of the accident;
( e ) Last point of departure and point of intended landing of the aircraft;
( f ) Position of the aircraft with reference to some easily defined geographical point;
( g ) Number of persons aboard, number killed, and number seriously injured;
( h ) Nature of the accident, the weather and the extent of damage to the aircraft, so far as is known; and
( i ) A description of any explosives, radioactive materials, or other dangerous articles carried.
#### § 31.11 Referral of complaint and answer to the ALJ.

Upon receipt of an answer, the reviewing official shall refer the matter to an ALJ by filing the complaint and answer in accordance with § 31.26.
#### Lena H. Ogilby et al., Appellants, *v.*Chandler H. Hickok, Respondent.

*Ogilby*v. *Hickok,*144 App. Div. 61,899 affirmed.

(Argued May 31, 1911;

decided June 16, 1911.)

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 27, 1911, which reversed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term sustaining a demurrer to the answer in an action of partition.

The following question was certified: “Is the further and separate defense demurred to contained in the answer to the amended complaint herein sufficient in law upon the face thereof? ”

*Arthur O. Townsend*and *Hamilton Rogers for*appellants.

*Ralph P. Buell*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Chase and Collin, JJ
**Exhibit 21**                     **Jurisdiction of**          **Incorporation or**       **Entity**  **Organization**   **1**   Artesyn Communication Products, Inc.  Wisconsin   **2**   Artesyn Communication Products Scandinavia AB  Sweden   **3**   Artesyn Communications Products UK Ltd.  Scotland   **4**   Spider Software, Ltd.  Scotland   **5**   Artesyn Asset Management, Inc.  Delaware (Bahamas Domiciled)   **6**   Artesyn North America, Inc.  Delaware   **7**   Artesyn Technologies Japan KK  Japan   **8**   Artesyn Delaware, Inc.  Delaware   **9**   Artesyn Delaware LLC  Delaware   **10**   Artesyn Cayman LP  Cayman Islands   **11**   Artesyn International Ltd.  Cayman Islands   **12**   Artesyn International, Ltd. Branch  Irish Non-Resident   **13**   Artesyn do Brasil Comercio de Produtos de Conversao de Energia Ltda.  Brazil   **14**   Artesyn Ireland, Ltd.  Cayman Islands   **15**   Artesyn Technologies Asia Pacific, Ltd.  Hong Kong   **16**   Artesyn Netherlands B.V.  Netherlands   **17**   Artesyn UK Ltd.  United Kingdom   **18**   Artesyn France S.A.R.L.  France   **19**   Artesyn Holding GmbH  Austria   **20**   Artesyn Austria GmbH  Austria   **21**   Artesyn Austria GmbH & Co. KG  Austria   **22**   Artesyn Hungary Electronikai kft  Hungary   **23**   Artesyn Germany GmbH  Germany   **24**   Artesyn Elektronische Gerate Beteiligungs-und Verwaltungs-GmbH  Germany   **25**   Artesyn GmbH & Co. KG  Germany   **26**   Zhongshan Artesyn Technologies Electronics Co., Ltd.  People’s Republic of China
From: Judy McChester [mailto:jamm1203@att.net] 

Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2015 12:54 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Dear DOL.

As a no longer actively employed, I strongly support the efforts to mandate standards 

across the financial industry. Finance is complicated, even for someone like myself who worked in 

the executive rank. Upon early retirement, I was aghast at the inconsistent information provided by 

various sources in the financial market that resulted in little confidence (even now) that I have made 

the correct investment decisions.

PLEASE continue to pursue and implement standards that will hold both advisors and brokers 

accountability. After our personal losses in the 2008/2009 financial melt down, with no banker held 

accountable, the public simply cannot afford additional losses because advisors/brokers lack the 

proper governmental oversight to protect the public.

Sincerely,

Judy McChester-Nedd 

Retiree & Bewildered Investor
#### § 663.13 Buy America requirements.

A Buy America certification under this part shall be issued in addition to any certification which may be required by part 661 of this title. Nothing in this part precludes FTA from conducting a Buy America investigation under part 661 of this title.
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Roy Dalene, certify that: (1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Hamptons Luxury Homes, Inc.; (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this  report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; (4) The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in the report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that has occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and (5) The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date:  November 17, 2006 /s/ Roy Dalene Roy Dalene
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet and Statement of Operations filed as a part of the report on Form 10QSB
for the quarter ended April 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                          38,885
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  141,214
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               184,215
<PP&E>                                         310,032
<DEPRECIATION>                                  89,097
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 479,358
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          291,655
<BONDS>                                      1,592,040
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,422
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,423,759)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   479,358
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               201,344
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  262,605
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               338,395
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (33,287)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (432,943)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (432,943)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (432,943)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2



Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Janet N. Gutkin, Chief Accounting Officer of Comarco, Inc., certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Comarco, Inc.;
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date: May 31, 2015 | /s/ Janet N. Gutkin                                                   
|------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   | Janet N. Gutkin
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|                   |
§ 701.4 Amtrak public information. ( a ) *Amtrak FOIA Web site.* Amtrak will make available electronically records created by the Corporation that are required under the FOIA to be made available for public inspection which can be accessed at the Amtrak FOIA Web site *http://www.amtrak.com/foia* and *www.amtrak.com .*
( b ) *Frequently requested information.* The FOIA requires that copies of records, regardless of form or format, that have been released pursuant to a FOIA request under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(3) be made publicly available in an electronic format if because of the nature of their subject matter they have become or are likely to become the subject of subsequent requests for substantially the same records or they have been requested three or more times. ( 1 ) Amtrak shall decide on a case-by-case basis whether records fall into the first category of “frequently requested FOIA records” based on the following factors: ( i ) Previous experience with similar records;
( ii ) The nature and type of information contained in the records;
( iii ) The identity and number of requesters and whether there is widespread media or commercial interest in the records.
( c ) *Guide for making requests.* A guide on how to use the FOIA for requesting records from Amtrak shall be made available to the public upon request. Amtrak's major information systems will be described in the guide.
# From flip phone to smart phone: AWACS gets an upgrade

/ Published Sept. 17, 2020
TINKER AIR FORCE BASE, Okla. , 
The first fully qualified crew under the new crew design for the E-3 G Airborne Warning and Control System reached their deployment location in September 2020.

The new crew design, introduced in 2016, was inspired by the Block 40/45 Modernization Program update to the E-3 AWACS weapons system. As the Block 40/45 configuration enhances interoperability and mission system reliability, it was a natural point to capitalize on the technological improvements and revamp the crew design.

In the past, aircrew members were organized into several different job specializations on the jet. An individual would arrive at Tinker Air Force Base, learn how to operate an extremely dated computer for a specific crew position and once experienced in that position be retrained into a different crew position. This retraining required them to learn a new set of computer operations. 

With improved technology on the aircraft, the new crew construct trains operators for all specialties, allowing one to become an expert in all areas from the beginning, drastically improving mission flexibility and team cohesiveness.

With the stovepipe specialties removed, all mission crew members can fill multiple positions on the E-3G, and the crew makeup can be flexibly tailored to meet mission requirements. If one Air Battle Manager falls ill, another Air Battle Manager scheduled for that mission can fill in.  Before this change, the mission was in danger if one crewmember of that specialty fell ill.

The new construct also enhances team cohesion. In the past, individuals were often divided by specialty. When mission planning or executing, there was a limited amount of individuals who could answer questions. Now, all individuals are able to complete similar tasks, and combine more mind-power to any problem that may arise.

The transition did not come without any roadblocks for the recently deployed squadron. In order for the squadron to be combat-capable, every member needed to complete the necessary academics, simulated flights, as well as six flights with the new crew concept.

While this ramp-up was taking place, COVID-19 restrictions caused several challenges.  Members had to find a way to complete the necessary training requirements while social distancing, managing primary care-giver roles and complete all pre-deployment requirements.

 As the AWACS received the technological advancements of the Block 40/45, the design was complimented with flexible mission crew options for Commanders, improving the efficiency of Battle Management Command and Control capabilities for the enduring future.
# Expediting Avionics in the Middle East - 1107th TASMG

/ Published Feb. 19, 2020
KUWAIT, 

                Soldiers of the 1107th Theater Aviation Sustainment Maintenance Group work to offload a CH-47 (Chinook) helicopter at Camp Buehring, Kuwait, Feb. 03, 2020. (Courtesy photo)            

                Expediting Avionics in the Middle East            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Tom Gagnier

VIRIN: 200203-A-AB111-710
From: Dave Roselli

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA

Subject: AGE 26 regulations

Date: Monday, May 10, 2010 2:13:36 PM

Example:   A 22 year old was not eligible under the plan until enactment of the age 26

requirement.  The plan gives notice of the 22 year olds right to coverage and  22 year old does not

elect coverage.  Need the “child” be given any other chance to enroll?  If so when?

Question:  A 22 year old on Cobra.   Notice given of child’s right to enroll under the plan.  Does this

notice need to be given directly to the Cobra participant? Is the employer required to bill the

former  Cobra participant directly if they elect coverage?

Question:  A 22 year old living at home and not covered gets a copy of the notice of election and

elects coverage.  Does the employee have to pay for the coverage?

Question:  A 22 year old is covered under his father’s plan.  His father terminates all dependent

coverage.  Does the 22 year old have any right to coverage? This would not be a Cobra qualifying

event. 

NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This message, along with any attachments, may contain confidential material, be legally

privileged and is the exclusive property of the sender. The transmitted information is intended exclusively for the use of

the individual or entity to whom the documents should be delivered. If you are neither the intended recipient nor the

employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any

disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this transmission is strictly

prohibited. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS MESSAGE IN ERROR, please notify the sender immediately, and promptly

destroy it without review. THANK YOU.
#### § 633.3 Scope.

This rule applies to a recipient of Federal financial assistance undertaking a major capital project for public transportation under Chapter 53 of Title 49, United States Code, or any other provision of Federal Law.