alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.22



[Premcor logo appears here]



1700 East Putnam Avenue, Suite 500

Old
Greenwich, CT 06870



December 15, 2003



Mr. Thomas D. OMalley

Horse Island, Mead Point

Greenwich, CT 06830



Dear Tom:



On January 30, 2002, you executed an Employment Agreement (Agreement) with the Company that provided that you would receive an annual grant of stock options
under terms defined in the Agreement.



Management and the Companys Board
of Directors have determined that it is desirable to modify the terms for the year 2004 only of the grant of stock options. Under these new terms, during the month of January of the year 2004, you will receive a grant of options to purchase 150,000
shares of Company common stock at an exercise price per share equal to Fair Market Value (as defined in the Plan) on the date of grant (the Annual Options). Subject to your continued employment with the Company, such Annual Options will
vest in equal installments on each of the first five anniversaries of the date of grant, and will become fully vested upon the occurrence of a Change in Control of the Company. Other terms and conditions of the Annual Options shall be as set forth
your Agreement, in the Plan, and an option agreement between you and the Company. If the Company should, prior to any Annual Option grant, be involved in any merger, reorganization, stock split or spinoff or other similar event, the number of shares
subject to the Annual Options yet to be granted, as provided above, shall be adjusted on a pro rata basis.



Your acceptance of this letter shall serve as your consent to the change in terms with respect to your Annual Options. This letter shall also serve as a waiver by you of the change in terms of your Annual Options as a
purported breach of your employment agreement.



Please execute one copy of this
letter and return it to James R. Voss, Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer.



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|Sincerely,                                        
|                                                  
|/s/    Richard C. Lappin                          
|                                                  
|Richard C. Lappin Chairman, Compensation
Committee



|                          |  |  |  |       |  | 
|------------------------- |  |  |  | ----- |  | 
|Agreed and Accepted:      |  |  |  |       |  | 
|                          |  |  | 
|/s/    Thomas D. OMalley |  |  |  | Date: |  | 
|                          |  |  |  |       |  | 
|Thomas D. OMalley        |  |  |  |       |  |
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003 I, Mary Dridi, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
webMethods, Inc., have executed this certification in connection with the
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the registrants
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended
December 31, 2004. I
certify that: 1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of webMethods, Inc.; 2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report; 3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have: (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and 5.    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function): (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. Date:
February 14, 2005
    
    /S/ MARY DRIDIName: Mary DridiTitle: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Artesyn Technologies, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph M. ODonnell, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ Joseph M. ODonnell             
|Joseph M. ODonnell                 
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|                                    
|April 3, 2006                       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.
Strafford,

Dec., 1900.

#### Barrett *v.*Somersworth.

*Walter W Scott*and *William S. Pierce,*for the plaintiff.

*Harry V. Moore*and *Edgerly & Mathews,*for the defendants.

Case, for injuries caused by a defective highway. Verdict for-the plaintiff. The plaintiff’s counsel, in his closing argument to the jury, stated that in consequence of the advice of the doctor upon whom the husband of the plaintiff called on the night of the accident, the husband took her home and applied hot and" cold water to her back, sat up with her all night, and at his earliest convenience in the morning employed a doctor. The defendants excepted on the ground that the statement was not warranted by the evidence. It appearing that the statement was fully justified by the evidence, the exception was overruled upon the plaintiff’s, motion, “ as frivolous, vexatious, and groundless,” and judgment ordered on the verdict.

Young, J., did not sit.
**EXHIBIT 23.3**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**
     We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-3 andS-8 (No. 33-59641, 33-59643, 33-59645, 333-15537,333-30125, 333-38895, 333-77323, 333-65818, and 333-65846) of CTCommunications, Inc. of our reports dated February 14,2003, relating to the financial statements of the North CarolinaRSA No. 5 Cellular Partnership, North Carolina RSANo. 15 Cellular Partnership, South Carolina RSA No. 2Cellular General Partnership, South Carolina RSA No. 3Cellular General Partnership, South Carolina RSA No. 4Cellular General Partnership, South Carolina RSA No. 5Cellular General Partnership, South Carolina RSA No. 6Cellular General Partnership, South Carolina RSA No. 7Cellular General Partnership, South Carolina RSA No. 8Cellular General Partnership, and South Carolina RSA No. 9Cellular General Partnership, which are included in CTCommunications Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2002.
 /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP    
Little Rock, ArkansasMarch 28, 2003
#### James A. Sheridan, Appellant, v. Henry Farnham, Respondent.

Judgment of the County Court of Onondaga county reversed, and judgment of the Justices’ Court affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Hardin, P. J.
#### The New England Granite Works, *Respondents, v.*Edmund Doane, *Sheriff, etc., Appellant.*

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Hykman, J.
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE
ALPHARMA INC. SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS PLAN



The Alpharma Inc. Supplemental Savings Plan (the "Plan") is hereby amended effective as of June 22, 2006, as follows:



1.    Section 9.1 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

"Amendment.  The Company, acting through its Board of Directors, shall have the right to amend the Plan from time to time except that no such amendment shall, without the consent of the Participant to whom amounts have been credited to his Accounts, adversely affect the Participant's (and his beneficiary's) right to payments of such amounts.



Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board of Directors has delegated to the executive management Benefits Committee the authority to adopt administrative amendments to the Plan, provided, that such amendments do not involve a change in the costs or liability of the Company or alter the benefits payable thereunder.  The Board of Directors has delegated to the Compensation Committee the authority to adopt all other amendments to the Plan, provided, that such amendments do not significantly increase or decrease benefit amounts, or  are  required  to be adopted by the Board of Directors under the Code or the regulations thereunder.  The Board of Directors retains the authority to adopt amendments to the Plan that significantly increase or decrease benefit amounts, or are required to be adopted by the Board of Directors under the Code or regulations thereunder."



2.    Section 9.2 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the first sentence thereof and replacing it with the following:

"The Company, acting through its Board of Directors, may, in its discretion, terminate the Plan at any time, however, no such termination shall alter a Participant's (and his beneficiary's) right to the amounts previously credited to his Accounts."





|/s/ George P. Rose____ | _October 23, 2006_______
|---------------------- | ------------------------
|ALPHARMA INC.          | DATE
From: LLOYD GILHAM [mailto:lloydgilham@msn.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 3:50 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Public comments on lifetime income options for retirement plans

People that have 401 K's/403 B's and the like are astute enough to determine 

whether T-bonds are appropriate for their investment portfolio. If they desire to 

purchase these instruments, there are many avenues to do so without the DoL 

getting involved. Should DoL want to help, pushing for financial education starting in 

kindergarden and going through high school will have a greater bang for the buck. If 

you really want to help retirees, work to keep Social Security solvent. 

Lloyd Gilham 

Portland, OR
# April 21 USCENTCOM Conducts Humanitarian Airdrop into Gaza

/ Published April 21, 2024

April 21,2024Release Number 20240421-FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla. –**U.S. Central Command conducted a humanitarian assistance airdrop into Northern Gaza on April 21, 2024, at 11:56 A.M. (Gaza time) to provide essential relief to civilians in Gaza affected by the ongoing conflict.  

The joint operation included four U.S. Air Force C-130 aircraft. The U.S. C-130’s dropped 50,688 Meals Ready to Eat (MREs), providing life-saving humanitarian assistance in Northern Gaza.  To date the U.S. has dropped nearly 1,001 tons of humanitarian assistance. 

During today's mission one bundle landed in the sea. USCENTCOM does not assess civilian harm or damage to infrastructure at this time but continues to monitor the situation. 

The DoD humanitarian airdrops contribute to ongoing U.S. and partner-nation government efforts to alleviate human suffering. These airdrops are part of a sustained effort, and we continue to plan follow-on aerial deliveries.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 448 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 16, 2002.
Whereas The First Tee, a youth character building organization, teaches young 
        people positive values reinforced through the game of golf;
Whereas The First Tee is working to make the game of golf more affordable and 
        accessible to young people across the country;
Whereas The First Tee is implemented through a partnership of parents, civic and 
        corporate leaders, State and local governments, youth-serving agencies, 
        schools, and the golfing community;
Whereas community-based programs such as The First Tee play an important role in 
        educating youth in the positive values that build strong character;
Whereas, through the teachings of The First Tee Life Skills experience, young 
        people learn the importance of maintaining a positive attitude, 
        considering the consequences of their decisions, setting and achieving 
        objectives, holding themselves to high standards, and applying to their 
        everyday lives values such as responsibility, honesty, integrity, 
        respect, confidence, and sportsmanship;
Whereas the strong values that The First Tee teaches to youth will positively 
        impact their lives, their education, and their experiences in school;
Whereas the character traits youth learn in The First Tee Life Skills experience 
        and Annual Life Skills and Leadership Academy complement the character 
        education programs found in many schools;
Whereas these lessons are taught through a variety of golf-related exercises 
        designed to enhance fundamental golf skills while promoting strong 
        character;
Whereas these lessons will remain with participants for a lifetime, regardless 
        of whether they play golf professionally or as a hobby; and
Whereas The First Tee has established and incorporated 9 core values that 
        reflect the principles of character education, namely: confidence, 
        courtesy, honesty, integrity, judgment, perseverance, respect, 
        responsibility, and sportsmanship: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes The First 
Tee for its support of programs that provide young people of all 
backgrounds an opportunity to develop, through golf and character 
education, life-enhancing values such as honor, integrity, and 
sportsmanship.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# Oct. 26: Military airstrikes continue against ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published Oct. 26, 2014

October 26, 2014

Release #20141031FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

TAMPA, Fla., Oct. 26, 2014 - U.S. military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria Saturday and today using fighter and bomber aircraft to conduct five airstrikes.  Separately, U.S. and partner nation military forces conducted twelve airstrikes Saturday and today using fighters, attack and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL terrorists in Iraq.

In Syria, five airstrikes near Kobani destroyed seven ISIL vehicles and an ISIL building.  In Iraq, six airstrikes west of the Mosul Dam area struck two small ISIL units, damaged an ISIL building and destroyed four ISIL vehicles and an ISIL artillery piece.  Three airstrikes southwest of the Mosul Dam area struck a large ISIL unit and a small ISIL unit, and destroyed two ISIL vehicles and two ISIL buildings.  Three airstrikes southeast of Fallujah struck two large ISIL units, a small ISIL unit and destroyed one ISIL building.  All aircraft departed the strike areas safely.  Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports.

The strikes were conducted as part of Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the terrorist group ISIL and the threat they pose to Iraq, the region and the wider international community.  The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group's ability to project power and conduct operations.  Among the coalition nations conducting airstrikes in Iraq are the U.S., France, United Kingdom, Australia, Belgium, Denmark and the Netherlands. Coalition nations conducting airstrikes in Syria include the U.S., Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Jordan, and Bahrain.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

Received: January 10, 2016

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1k0-8nbe-zz2p

Comments Due: January 19, 2016

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2015-0017

Claims Procedure for Plans Providing Disability Benefits

Comment On: EBSA-2015-0017-0001

Claims Procedure for Plans Providing Disability Benefits

Document: EBSA-2015-0017-DRAFT-0017

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-29295

Submitter Information

Name: 

Address: 

Phone:

General Comment

I well remember how It was when I contradicted CFS and was forced to stop working. The 

financial hit was devastating. Please vote for the ERISA changes.
IV

House Calendar No. 179

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 461

[Report No. 107–536]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5010) making appropriations

for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September

30, 2003, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 26, 2002

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5010) making

appropriations for the Department of Defense for the

fiscal year ending September 30, 2003, and for other

purposes.

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of

3 rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 5010) making appropriations for

6 the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending Sep-
2

HRES 461 RH

1 tember 30, 2003, and for other purposes. The first reading

2 of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order

3 against consideration of the bill are waived. General de4 bate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one

5 hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

6 ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropria7 tions. After general debate the bill shall be considered for

8 amendment under the five-minute rule. Points of order

9 against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with

10 clause 2 of rule XXI are waived. During consideration of

11 the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee

12 of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the

13 basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has

14 caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional

15 Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule

16 XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as

17 read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for

18 amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill

19 to the House with such amendments as may have been

20 adopted. The previous question shall be considered as or21 dered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage

22 without intervening motion except one motion to recommit

23 with or without instructions.

24 SEC. 2. That upon the adoption of this resolution it

25 shall be in order, any rule of the House to the contrary
3

HRES 461 RH

1 notwithstanding, to consider concurrent resolutions pro2 viding for adjournment of the House and Senate during

3 the month of July.
House Calendar No. 179

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 461

[Report No. 107–536]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5010)

making appropriations for the Department ofDefense for the fiscal year ending September 30,2003, and for other purposes.

JUNE 26, 2002

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
# Iranian-backed Houthi small boats attack merchant vessel and U.S. Navy helicopters in Southern Red Sea

/ Published Dec. 31, 2023
TAMPA, Fla., 
On Dec. 31 at 6:30am (Sanaa time) the container ship MAERSK HANGZHOU issued a second distress call in less than 24 hours reporting being under attack by four Iranian-backed Houthi small boats. The small boats, originating from Houthi-controlled areas in Yemen, fired crew served and small arms weapons at the MAERSK HANGZHOU, getting to within 20 meters of the vessel, and attempted to board the vessel. A contract embarked security team on the MAERSK HANZGHOU returned fire. U.S. helicopters from the USS EISENHOWER (CVN 69) and GRAVELY (DDG 107) responded to the distress call and in the process of issuing verbal calls to the small boats, the small boats fired upon the U.S. helicopters with crew served weapons and small arms. The U.S. Navy helicopters returned fire in self-defense, sinking three of the four small boats, and killing the crews. The fourth boat fled the area. There was no damage to U.S. personnel or equipment.
Editorial Note on Part 450
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 450 appear at 74 FR 49241, Sept. 25, 2009, and at 77 FR 59790, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 450.13 Granting of delegation. ( a ) The Chief, Office of Operating and Environmental Standards (CG-OES), U.S. Coast Guard acts on applications for delegation within 60 days of receipt.
( b ) If an applicant for delegation does not provide sufficient information with regard to all the criteria for delegation, the Chief, Office of Operating and Environmental Standards (CG-OES), U.S. Coast Guard denies the application. A denial of an application on this basis is without prejudice to the submission of a new or amended application.
( c ) If an applicant satisfies all the criteria for delegation the Chief, Office of Operating and Environmental Standards (CG-OES), U.S. Coast Guard sends the applicant a letter of delegation, and assigns to the Approval Authority an alphabetic Approval Authority identification code.
( d ) If an applicant fails to satisfy all the criteria for delegation, the Chief, Office of Operating and Environmental Standards (CG-OES), U.S. Coast Guard gives the applicant written notice of denial of his application. The notice contains all the reasons for the denial. The applicant may contest the denial by submitting additional oral or written evidence in support of its qualifications. Upon review of the evidence, the Chief, Office of Operating and Environmental Standards (CG-OES), U.S. Coast Guard notifies the applicant of the final decision.
[45 FR 37213, June 2, 1980, as amended at 47 FR 50496, Nov. 8, 1982; 69 FR 58352, Sept. 30, 2004]