alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 41

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Transportation

and Infrastructure in the One Hundred Seventh Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 14, 2001

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska submitted the following resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on

Transportation and Infrastructure in the One Hundred

Seventh Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Transportation

4 and Infrastructure (hereafter in this resolution referred

5 to as the ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff

6 salaries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts

7 of the House of Representatives for committee salaries

8 and expenses, not more than $16,559,562 for the One

9 Hundred Seventh Congress.
2

•HRES 41 IH

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

2 Of the amount specified in section 1—

3 (1) not more than $7,873,320 shall be available

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

5 noon on January 3, 2001, and ending immediately

6 before noon on January 3, 2002; and

7 (2) not more than $8,686,242 shall be available

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

9 noon on January 3, 2002, and ending immediately

10 before noon on January 3, 2003.

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration.

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by

19 the Committee on House Administration.

Æ
Exhibit 23.2





             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-42543 dated August 30, 1991) pertaining to
the Cognitronics Corporation 1967 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the
Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-42544 dated August 30, 1991
and Form S-8 No. 333-05897 dated June 13, 1996) pertaining to the
Cognitronics Corporation 1990 Stock Option Plan and the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-05899 dated June 13, 1996) pertaining to
the Cognitronics Corporation Restricted Stock Plan of our report dated
March 7, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Cognitronics Corporation, as of December 31, 2002, and for each of the
two years in the period ended December 31, 2002 included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.




                                                 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
March 29, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 496 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 22, 2002.
Whereas studies have shown an alarming increase in steroid use among children, 
        who may be modeling their behavior after professional athletes;
Whereas one report said that steroid use by high school boys was as high as 12 
        percent;
Whereas earlier this year, 2 retired Major League Baseball players, each having 
        been a Most Valuable Player, admitted to steroid use, unleashing a wave 
        of articles about rampant use throughout the league;
Whereas the stories have focused on the muscle-enhancing aspect of steroids, 
        linking it to a surge in power hitting among many players;
Whereas the Nation's children are receiving the wrong message, namely that drug 
        use is not only permissible, but desirable if an individual wants to 
        perform at his or her best;
Whereas the truth is that steroids are dangerous and harmful to an individual's 
        health and have no place in our national pastime or the lives of the 
        Nation's children;
Whereas other professional sports, notably football, basketball, and even the 
        Olympics, already ban steroids, a dangerous drug that often causes liver 
        damage, kidney failure, heart disease, and brain tumors;
Whereas although steroid use is illegal without a doctor's prescription, the 
        failure in Major League Baseball to test for such use has led to 
        speculation that steroids are widely abused by many of today's players;
Whereas professional baseball players have tremendous influence on children and 
        therefore have an obligation to attempt to be good role models;
Whereas the question of rampant, systemic steroid abuse now hangs over a game 
        that the people of the United States love; and
Whereas instituting mandatory steroid testing will send the right message to the 
        public, namely that Major League Baseball is serious about banning 
        steroids and will continually work to protect the integrity of the game: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that--
            (1) Major League Baseball and the Major League Baseball Players 
        Association should implement a mandatory steroid testing program; and
            (2) such a program would send a clear message to our Nation's 
        children that steroids are dangerous, illegal, and morally offensive to 
        our country's competitive spirit and one of our most cherished sports.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0555.html[7/20/2015 8:39:13 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-xmq8

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0555

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Larry Seppi

General Comment

401K plans are PERSONAL retirement accounts,not government bailout accounts. Those of us who invested in a

 401k were smart enough to plan for our retirements, and we're smart enough to spend it wisely. We do not need

 the government mandating how that money can or can't be used, or at what rate it can be withdrawn. I control

 my 401k. I determine how much to invest in the account and how to invest the funds within the account. It's

 been doing fine because the government is not involved. Keep it that way.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-11-00053-CV

ALESIA K. JOHNSON, Appellant

V.

SCOTT MAHAND, J. J. (JACKIE) JOHNSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND

AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF 

J. C. JOHNSON, DECEASED AND JIMMIE JOHNSON, Appellees

On Appeal from the 196th District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court No. 72416

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Alesia K. Johnson, appellant, has filed a motion seeking to dismiss this appeal. Pursuant 

to Rule 42.1(a)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the motion is granted. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: February 24, 2014

Date Decided: February 25, 2014
June 16, 2015

Mr. Richard Terrill

P.O. Box 2220

Saratoga, CA 95070

Dear Mr. Terrill:

This is in response to your May 2, 2014 letter (public docket No. FAA-2014-0296) submitted 

to the Federal Aviation Administration to amend §§ 61.155(d) and 61.165(f) of Title 14, 

Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). 

The FAA has considered your request. However, when the FAA responds to petitions for 

rulemaking, it must follow the requirements of 14 CFR Part 11, particularly those guidelines 

for processing petitions for rulemaking found in § 11.73. As stated in that section, the FAA 

uses the following criteria when making a decision as to whether or not to amend current 

regulations based on a petition for rulemaking: 

1) the immediacy of the safety or security concerns the petition raises;

2) the priority of other FAA issues; and

3) the resources we have available to address these issues.

That petition for rulemaking, if amended, would amend the rule by allowing an Air Transport 

Pilot (ATP) airplane category multiengine class rating to be added to an ATP airplane

category single engine class certificate. In addition, it would focus more explicitly on the 

knowledge test to ensure candidates have properly demonstrated knowledge appropriate to 

their category class rating.

The FAA has a priority list for rulemaking that addresses many issues that are critical to the 

safety of the aviation community and the traveling public. The FAA must prioritize its 

limited rulemaking resources so as to deliver the most value to the aviation system as a 

whole. Although the issues raised in your petition may have merit, they do not address an 

immediate safety concern.

For the reasons stated above, we are unable to process your requests and thereby deny your 

petition for rulemaking in accordance with 14 CFR § 11.73. Although the FAA has decided to 

deny the requests, your comments and reasons for a rule change will be considered if the 
2

agency undertakes future rulemaking in this area. Accordingly, Docket No. FAA-2014-0296 

is being closed.

Sincerely,

/s/

John Barbagallo

Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service
----

(2004/C 84 E/0655)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0389/04

by Gianfranco Dell'Alba (NI), Olivier Dupuis (Nl), Marco Cappato (NI), Benedetto Della Vedova (NI), Marco Pannella (NI), Maurizio Turco (NI) and Emma Bonino (NI) to the Commission

(12 February 2004)

Subject:   African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights

On 25 January the Protocol for the establishment of the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights entered into force. This is a major development in the history of the international protection of human rights. Currently, 15 African states are subject to the jurisdiction of this new court. Some of them are troubled by widespread violations of human rights and civil strife, such as Algeria, Burundi, Côte d'Ivoire and Rwanda. Botswana, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Niger, and others, are expected to ratify soon.

As in the erstwhile European human rights system, and, as in the case of the current system for the Americas, the establishment of the African Court will not abolish the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights. Rather, the Court will complement the Commission. In tandem, they can alter the landscape of accountable government in Africa. Unlike the case of the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights, which has existed since 1987, the judgments of the Court will be legally binding and thus enforceable in courts of law across Africa. Moreover, in the case of those countries who have accepted to do so, individuals will be able to approach the Court directly. This is a not-to-be-missed opportunity to strengthen the effectiveness of the African human rights regime and promote democracy in that continent.

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(22 March 2004)

----
1210-AB32-2-1470.html[7/26/2015 5:31:26 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwg-6ep1

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1966

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Patrick Douglas

General Comment

Hands off my money
From: Carlson, Sara <Sara.Carlson@anadarko.com>

Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 12:16 PM

To: Fortin, Kelly; Land, Eva

Cc: Maness, Katie; Rahul Pendse (rpendse@trinityconsultants.com); Grygar,

Bill

Subject: RE: Anadarko Permit and Modification Processing Priority

Hey Kelly,

As we discussed in the meeting on August 4 th , Anadarko would like to make the BlackHawk and

BlackHornet air permit applications the priority and put the Noble Bob Douglas air permit app lication on

hold.

If you have any questions please feel free to contact me.

Thanks,

Sara Carlson

Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

EHS Representative II, Gulf of Mexico

Sara.Carlson@anadarko.com

832

- 636

- 127

3 (office)

832

- 506

- 0888 (cell)

Click here for Anadarko’s Electronic Mail Disclaimer
§ 390.38 Exemptions for pipeline welding trucks. ( a ) *Federal requirements.* A pipeline welding truck, as defined in paragraph (b) of this section, including the individuals operating such vehicle and the employer of such individual, is exempt from the following: ( 1 ) Any requirement relating to registration as a motor carrier, including the requirement to obtain and display a Department of Transportation number, in 49 CFR part 365 or 390.
( 2 ) Any requirement relating to driver qualifications in 49 CFR part 391.
( 3 ) Any requirement relating to driving of commercial motor vehicles in 49 CFR part 392.
( 4 ) Any requirement relating to parts and accessories and inspection, repair, and maintenance of commercial motor vehicles in 49 CFR parts 393 and 396.
( 5 ) Any requirement relating to hours of service of drivers, including maximum driving and on duty time, found in 49 CFR part 395.
( b ) *Definition.* “Pipeline welding truck” means a motor vehicle that is travelling in the State in which the vehicle is registered or another State, is owned by a welder, is a pick-up style truck, is equipped with a welding rig that is used in the construction or maintenance of pipelines, and has a gross vehicle weight and combination weight rating and weight of 15,000 pounds or less.
[81 FR 47720, July 22, 2016]
#### John W. Miller v. E. Ellery Anderson.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
**Exhibit 31.B**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, D. Mark Leland, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of El Paso CGP Company;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
Date: August 30, 2005                 /s/ D. Mark Leland   D. Mark Leland    Executive Vice President and
Editorial Note on Part 571
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 571 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 571.8 Effective date. ( a ) *Firefighting vehicles.* Notwithstanding the effective date provisions of the motor vehicle safety standards in this part, the effective date of any standard or amendment of a standard issued after September 1, 1971, to which firefighting vehicles must conform shall be, with respect to such vehicles, either 2 years after the date on which such standard or amendment is published in the rules and regulations section of the Federal Register, or the effective date specified in the notice, whichever is later, except as such standard or amendment may otherwise specifically provide with respect to firefighting vehicles.
( b ) *Vehicles built in two or more stages vehicles and altered vehicles.* Unless Congress directs or the agency expressly determines that this paragraph does not apply, the date for manufacturer certification of compliance with any standard, or amendment to a standard, that is issued on or after September 1, 2006 is, insofar as its application to intermediate and final-stage manufacturers and alterers is concerned, one year after the last applicable date for manufacturer certification of compliance. Nothing in this provision shall be construed as prohibiting earlier compliance with the standard or amendment or as precluding NHTSA from extending a compliance effective date for intermediate and final-stage manufacturers and alterers by more than one year.
[70 FR 7435, Feb. 14, 2005]
-----Original Message----- 

From: suew087@optonline.net [mailto:suew087@optonline.net] 

Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 4:30 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

May 02, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Susan Warner 

69 Pearce Avenue 

Manasquan, NJ 08736
**Exhibit 32.2**

** CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of ComputerHorizons Corp. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “AnnualReport”), I, Barbara Moss, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Section 1350), that:

1.    the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year endedDecember 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. Section 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date:   March 9, 2007 |     | /s/  BARBARA MOSS    |
|--------------------------------------|----------|---------------------------|
|                                 |     | BARBARA MOSS              |
|                                 | * * | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

This certification accompanies this Report onForm 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed bythe Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed tobe incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933,as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Companyspecifically incorporates it by reference.

 

----
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1383.html[7/23/2015 6:35:53 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvm-7cto

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1383

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: william weldin

General Comment

This is the land of the FREE and the home of the BRAVE not the land of the slaves to the government get out of

 ours lives NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!