alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 591

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 15 (legislative day, November 14), 2002.

Whereas President Thomas Jefferson received the approval of

Congress on 6 February 28, 1803, to fund an expedition

into the West with orders to explore the Missouri River

and such tributaries as might lead to the Pacific Ocean

on the most direct and practicable water route for purposes of commerce, in addition to which, the expedition

was to gather scientific and geographical information,

and to encourage peace among any Indian Nations encountered;

Whereas Meriwether Lewis, Captain of the First Regiment of

Infantry, and former Secretary to President Jefferson,

was appointed to lead the expedition, and he selected,

with the approval of the President, William Clark to

serve equally as a Captain in a leadership role;

Whereas the Expedition returned to St. Louis, Missouri, on

September 23, 1806, after a 28-month journey covering

8,000 miles during which it traversed 11 future States:

Illinois, Missouri, Kansas, Nebraska, Iowa, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Idaho, Washington, and

Oregon; and

Whereas the expedition was one of the most remarkable and

productive scientific and military exploratory expeditions

in all American history: Now, therefore, be it
2

•HRES 591 EH

Resolved, That the House of Representatives directs the

National Park Service to form a committee for the purpose

of establishing guidelines to launch a national design competition for the following project: In as much as Congress desires

to memorialize the Lewis and Clark Expedition and because

the City of Louis was the departing and returning points of

the Expedition as depicted by its Gateway to the West Arch,

therefore the City of St. Louis should display a proper recognition of these great men in the form of a heroic sculpture

portraying the Expedition to be built in the Luther Ely Smith

Park in downtown St. Louis, which lies between the Arch and

the Old Courthouse, all now governed by the National Park

Service.

Attest:

Clerk.
# Oct. 27: Military airstrikes continue against ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published Oct. 27, 2014

October 27, 2014

Release #20141032FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla., Oct. 27, 2014 -** U.S. military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria Sunday and today using fighter and bomber aircraft to conduct four airstrikes.  Separately, U.S. and partner nation military forces conducted seven airstrikes Sunday and today using fighters, attack and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL terrorists in Iraq.

In Syria, four airstrikes near Kobani destroyed five ISIL vehicles and an ISIL occupied building.  In Iraq, three airstrikes west of the Mosul Dam area struck a small ISIL fighting unit.  One airstrike southeast of Fallujah struck a large ISIL unit, destroyed an ISIL building and damaged an ISIL vehicle.  One airstrike south of the Bayji Oil refinery struck ISIL fighters.  One airstrike south of Bayji struck a small ISIL unit and destroyed an improved explosive device.  Finally, an airstrike east of Zumar struck a small ISIL unit and destroyed two ISIL occupied buildings.  All aircraft departed the strike areas safely.  Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports.

The strikes were conducted as part of Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the terrorist group ISIL and the threat they pose to Iraq, the region and the wider international community.  The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group's ability to project power and conduct operations.  Among the coalition nations conducting airstrikes in Iraq are the U.S., France, United Kingdom, Australia, Belgium, Denmark and the Netherlands. Coalition nations conducting airstrikes in Syria include the U.S., Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Jordan, and Bahrain.
# Saudi, U.S. Forces Conclude Amphibious Training in Tabuk

/ Published July 2, 2021
TABUK, Saudi Arabia, 
U.S. Marines and Sailors assigned to the 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) and Iwo Jima Amphibious Ready Group (ARG) completed bilateral theater amphibious combat rehearsal (TACR) training with the Royal Saudi Land Forces in Tabuk, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, June 26.TACR training began June 7 when U.S. naval forces conducted amphibious assault exercises. The three-week event included live-fire training, parachute jumps, explosive ordnance disposal ranges, medical drills, and convoys.“Training alongside our Saudi partners was a rewarding experience,” said Col. Eric D. Cloutier, commanding officer of the 24th MEU. “This bilateral exercise has collectively strengthened Saudi and U.S. military readiness and reinforced our common interests of security and stability throughout this region.”TACR training integrates Navy and Marine Corps assets to practice and rehearse a range of critical logistics, aviation and ground combat-related capabilities, both afloat and ashore, highlighting the expeditionary and quick-response capabilities of the MEU.As an inherently flexible maneuver force, capable of supporting routine and contingency operations, the presence of the ARG/MEU demonstrates the U.S. Navy’s commitment to regional partners and maritime security.
From: Tobin Ruhde [mailto:tobin.ruhde@latitudecorp.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 12:50 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule

I recently saw in an update from SHRM that the DOL is proposing rules to hold Broker/Dealers to

some level of fiduciary responsibility regarding 401(k) Plans.  As a plan administrator of a small

plan it is extremely frustrating to be obliged to offer a low‐cost (401(k) plan to our employees,

accept full fiduciary responsibility and at the same time rely on broker/dealer for advice on fund

selection knowing they have a financial interest in the funds chosen and currently have little

legal responsibility to do what is best for the participant.    

I am not in any way trying to shirk my responsibility as a plan administrator but the current

situation does not always guarantee the best results for the participant.  As an administrator

you can “buy” a higher cost plan to reduce the fiduciary responsibility.  This results in higher

costs for the plan and an administrator shouldn’t need to do this if the broker is doing his/her

job.  

Sincerely,      

Tobin Ruhde

Controller

Latitude Corp. PO BOX 930340, 1003 American Way, Verona WI 53593 * 608/845-1022 

direct * 608/845-2605 fax

Before printing this e-mail, think if it is necessary. Think Green Save a Tree 

IMPORTANT NOTICE!: The information in this e-mail, including attachments, is privileged and 

confidential. It is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the 

intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, archiving or 

copying of this message is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please 

notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. 

Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this communication are not given or 

endorsed by Latitude Corp. unless otherwise indicated by an authorized representative 

independent of this communication.
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

# Foreign Trade

Skip top of page navigation

###### You are here: Census.gov › Business & Industry ›Foreign Trade › U.S. International Trade Data

                - Main
                - About
                - Data
                - Outreach
                - AES
                - Regulations
                - Reference
                - Definitions
                - Schedule B
                - FAQs

### More DATA

                          - Trade Highlights
                          - Balance by Partner Country
                          - Country/Product Trade
                          - State/Metropolitan Data
                          - Historical Series
                          - Notices and Corrections
                          - Related Party Trade
                          - Press Releases
                          - Data Products

### Important Links

                          - Global Reach Blog
                          - Newsletters
                          - ACE AESDirect
                          Related Sites- Business and Industry
- Briefing Room
- North American Industry                Classification System (NAICS)
Economic Indicator Database
                          Geographic Concordance - Annual SubscriptionDownload a file- Click on the link below to download your file.
-  If you are having technical difficulties or need help, feel free to email us at eid.international.trade.data@census.gov or call 301-763-2311 for immediate assistance.
- Record layouts of the files are  available	      online .
Select Statistical Year:-      2024 Geographic Concordance	  

                          Export Training
Collection of videos to enhance export training.

Spanish Language Webinars 2020-2021 (Seminarios en Línea en Español 2020-2021)
2017 And Prior Year Webinars Archive.
Upcoming Outreach Activities
Upcoming Outreach Activities
Contact Us
				Contact the International Trade Macro Analysis Branch: Email us! or use our feedback form!

                  Call us: (301)763-2311 or 1-800-549-0595 option 4			  
CONNECT WITH US**********- Information Quality
- Data Linkage Infrastructure
- Data Protection and Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- FOIA
- Inspector General
- No FEAR Act
- U.S. Department of Commerce
- USA.gov

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
✕Is this page helpful?YesNo✕NO THANKS255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached✕Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions?  Source: U.S. Census Bureau | Foreign Trade |  ftdwebmaster@census.gov |     Last Revised:  July 03, 2024
#### § 585.52 Purpose.

The purpose of these requirements is to assist the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in determining whether a manufacturer has complied with the requirements of Standard No. 139.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7205

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMES ERNEST GANDY, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:20-cr-00040-CCE-1)

Submitted: September 1, 2022 Decided: October 6, 2022

Before RICHARDSON and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Ernest Gandy, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7205 Doc: 8 Filed: 10/06/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

James Ernest Gandy, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(1)(A) motions for compassionate release and denying his motion for

reconsideration. We review a district court’s denial of a compassionate release motion for 

abuse of discretion. United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 142 

S. Ct. 383 (2021). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the court did not abuse 

its discretion and sufficiently explained the reasons for the denial. Accordingly, although 

we grant Gandy’s motions to supplement his informal brief, we affirm the district court’s 

orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7205 Doc: 8 Filed: 10/06/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Egyptian ENS Sharm El-Sheikh, USS Somerset Perform Passing Exercise
 
  By Makin Island Amphibious Ready Group Public Affairs
  The Egyptian guided-missile frigate ENS Sharm El-Sheikh (FFG 901) and U.S. amphibious transport dock ship USS Somerset (LPD 25) conducted a passing exercise (PASSEX), March 14. A PASSEX is an exercise in which multiple ships operate in close vicinity to practice evolutions together to improve crews’ knowledge, navigation and interoperability. “Operating with the Egyptian Navy is a highlight for our deployment. As the U.S. Navy operates forward to reassure friends and deter adversaries, strengthening partnerships is important,” said Capt. Dave Kurtz, Somerset’s commanding officer. The PASSEX commenced with Sharm El-Sheikh and Somerset performing divisional tactics and maneuvers in formation. Additionally, the ships performed replenishment-at-sea approaches to strengthen our ability to operate together and increase shiphandling skills. “Our work with the Egyptians was coordinated in detail, and took advantage of common maritime operating procedures,” said Kurtz. Although brief, it solidifies that our two navies can and often do operate from the same playbook. By capturing those lessons, the next exercise can build on that foundation and become even more complex.” Somerset is deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations in support of naval operations to ensure maritime stability and security in the Central region, connecting the Mediterranean and the Pacific through the western Indian Ocean and three strategic choke points.
EXHIBIT 23-2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the registration  statements of
Artesyn Technologies,  Inc. on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-70326 and 33-49176),  Form
S-4/A (File No. 333-36375) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-42516, 33-63501, 33-63503,
33-63499,  333-03937,  333-08475,  333-45691 and  333-58771) of our report dated
February 18, 1997, on our audit of the  consolidated  financial  statements  and
financial  statement  schedule of Zytec Corporation as of December 31, 1996, and
for the year then ended,  which report is included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 26, 1999
§ 825.25 Oral argument. ( a ) If any party desires to argue a case orally before the Board, he should request leave to make such argument in his brief filed pursuant to § 825.20.
( b ) Oral argument before the Board will normally not be granted unless the Board finds good cause for such argument. If granted, the parties will be advised of the date.
Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 1
Editorial Note: 89 FR 101463, Dec. 16, 2024, updated the subject matter of Title 2 to “Federal Financial Assistance” (previously “Grants and Agreements”).

§ 1.105 Organization and subtitle content. ( a ) This title is organized into two subtitles.
( b ) The OMB guidance described in § 1.100(a) is published in subtitle A. Publication of the OMB guidance in the CFR does not change its nature—it is guidance, not regulation.
( c ) Each Federal agency that awards Federal financial assistance has a chapter in subtitle B in which it issues those regulations. The Federal agency regulations in subtitle B differ in nature from the OMB guidance in subtitle A because the OMB guidance is not regulatory. Federal agency regulations in subtitle B may give regulatory effect to the OMB guidance, to the extent that the agency regulations require compliance with all or portions of the OMB guidance. *See also* § 1.220.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-60495, 333-107873, 333-104253 and 333-104252) and Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-39554, 333-57501, 333-70229, 333-86037 and 333-86153) of Alpharma, Inc. of our report dated March 31, 2005, except for the restatement discussed in Note 2b (not presented herein) to the consolidated financial statements appearing under Item 15 of the Company's 2004 annual report on Form 10-K/A, as to which the date is May 5, 2005 and for the effects of discontinued operations discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, as to which the date is March 15, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements which appears in this Form 10-K.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
1210-AB32-2-1426.html[7/26/2015 4:56:42 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwb-jpnm

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1922

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Robin Boles

General Comment

I do not want my retirement planned by the government! I am smart enough to plan for my retirement, and so are

 others. We do not need the government's help in deciding how our 401Ks or other retirement options will be

 used. We have so many agencies out there to help us with retirement, so if someone does need help they can ask

 and get it. Do not make it mandatory!!
Grafton,

Dec., 1894.

#### Davis *v.*Smith.

The promissory note of a married woman, given for the purpose of preventing a criminal prosecution against her husband, is void.

Bill in Equity, praying that the defendant be enjoined from the further prosecution of a suit for foreclosure on real estate mortgaged to him by the plaintiff, and from removing, selling, or in any way interfering with certain personal property described in a chattel mortgage from the plaintiff to the defendant; and that he be commanded to cancel and surrender said mortgages and the note secured thereby.

*JBurleigh Adams,*for the plaintiff

*Alvin F. Wentworth*and *Jewell ft Stone,*for the defendant.

Smith, J.

There was an admitted deficit in the treasury of the Pemigewasset Mutual Relief' Association of $6,116.20. Davis, the president, Smith, the treasurer, and Story, the secretary, promised the insurance commissioner to pay that sum to him, and did pay it, in trust for the claimants against the association. The money was raised by Smith and Story, who strenuously insisted that Davis should contribute his proportionate share. He had no property and was unable to contribute anything. Smith and Story applied to the plaintiff, wife of the president of the association, and emphatically gave her to understand that she must assist them. All the officers understood that criminal proceedings would be instituted against them unless the demands of the commissioner for a further payment of $8,000 to cover an alleged deficit were speedily complied with. They so informed the plaintiff, and she so believed. Under these circumstances, she executed and delivered to the defendant her promissory note for $1,500, a mortgage of certain lands in Camp-ton, and a chattel mortgage of her household furniture and other personal property. In executing the note and mortgages, she was actuated solely by the belief that otherwise her husband would have to meet a criminal prosecution.

The note and mortgages given under such circumstances cannot be deemed valid and binding. It was decided in *Armstrong*v. *Toler,*11 Wheat. 258, that if a promise is entirely disconnected with the illegal act and is founded on a new consideration, it is not affected by the act, although it was known to the party to whom the promise was made, and although he was the contriver *254and conductor of the illegal act. In this case, however, the sole consideration for the note was the plaintiff’s fear of a criminal prosecution against her husband, induced by the representations made by the defendant for the express purpose of obtaining it. .It was given in expectation of and for the purpose of preventing such prosecution, and is void. *Richardson*v. Duncan, 3 N. H. 508; *Plumer*v. *Smith,*5 N. H. 553; Severance *v. Kimball,*8 N. H. 386; *Shaw*v. *Spooner,*9 N. H. 197; *Alexander*v. *Pierce,*10 N. H. 494; *Clark*v. *Pease,*41 N. H. 414; *Merrill*v. *Carr,*60 N. H. 114; *Bank*v. *Buzzell,*61 N. H. 612; *Proctor*v. *Lane,*62 N. H. 457. A party who pays money under duress may recover it back. *Richardson*v. *Duncan, supra.*

*Decree for the plaintiff.*

Blodgett, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1933

CARLTON W. REMBERT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE W. NEAL, Interim Trustee; DEBERA F.

CONLON, Assistant Trustee; AMERICAN GENERAL

FINANCE COMPANY; COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-02-264-2)

Submitted: January 30, 2003 Decided: February 4, 2003

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlton W. Rembert, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Ray Mayes, WOLCOTT,

RIVERS, WHEARY, BASNIGHT & KELLY, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia;

Alex Harry Pincus, Portsmouth, Virginia; George Maralan Kelley,

III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia;

Cecelia Ann Weschler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Norfolk,

Virginia; Peter Stevenson Lake, John Andrew Basham, HEILIG,

MCKENRY, FRAIM & LOLLAR, Norfolk, Virginia; Emmanuel Decena Voces,

SAMUEL I. WHITE, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: 

Carlton W. Rembert appeals from the district court’s order

dismissing his action brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown

Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Rembert v. Neal, No. CA-02-264-2 (E.D. Va.

July 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
---

Pacific Rim Geological Consulting, Inc.P.O. Box
81906, Fairbanks, Alaska, USA 99708Phone (907) 458-8951 Fax (907)
458-8511 Email: Bundtzen@mosquitonet.com

Consent of Author

To:  British Columbia Securities Commission
        Manitoba Securities
Commission         U.S.
Securities & Exchange Commission

And: Silverado Gold Mines, Ltd.

RE: Consent of Author

I, Thomas K. Bundtzen, do hereby consent to the public filing
of the NI 43-101 Technical Report Entitled: Update on Lode Mineral Resources
and Reserve Estimates, Antimony-Gold Deposits, Nolan Creek, Wiseman B-1
Quadrangle, Koyukuk Mining District, Alaska, July 9th,2011(The Technical Report) and to extract from, or a summary
of, the Technical Report, with any stock company, and other regulatory authority
and any publications by Silverado for regulatory purposes, including electronic
publication in the public company files on Silverados website accessible by the
public.

Dated this day of December 12th, 2011

|/s/
      Thomas K. Bundtzen                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Thomas K. Bundtzen, P. Geo, CPG 10912; Alaska Registered
      Geologist #652

---