alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 29 April 2004

in Case C-371/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt): Björnekulla Fruktindustrier AB v Procordia Food AB (1)

(Trade marks - Directive 89/104/EEC - Article 12(2)(a) - Revocation of rights conferred by the trade mark - Trade mark which has become the common name in the trade - Relevant classes of persons for purposes of the assessment)

(2004/C 118/42)

Language of the case: Swedish

In Case C-371/02: reference to the Court under Article 234 EC from the Svea hovrätt (Svea Court of Appeal) (Sweden) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Björnekulla Fruktindustrier AB and Procordia Food AB — on the interpretation of Article 12(2)(a) of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (OJ 1989 L 40, p. 1), — the Court (Sixth Chamber) composed of: V. Skouris, acting as the President of the Sixth Chamber, C. Gulmann (Rapporteur), J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, J.-P. Puissochet and R. Schintgen, Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; H. von Holstein, Deputy Registrar, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 29 April 2004, in which it has ruled:

Article 12(2)(a) of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks must be interpreted as meaning that in cases where intermediaries participate in the distribution to the consumer or the end user of a product which is the subject of a registered trade mark, the relevant classes of persons whose views fall to be taken into account in determining whether that trade mark has become the common name in the trade for the product in question comprise all consumers and end users and, depending on the features of the market concerned, all those in the trade who deal with that product commercially.

----

(1)  OJ C 305, 7.12.2002.

----
**EXHIBIT 32.1** **CERTIFICATE    OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT    TO    RULE 13a-14(b)    UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C.    1350**     The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief    Financial Officer of CT Communications, Inc. (the    “Company”), each hereby certifies that, to his    knowledge on the date hereof:     (a) the Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006    filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange    Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities    Exchange Act of 1934; and     (b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in    all material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company. /s/  Michael    R. Coltrane    Michael R. Coltrane    Chief Executive Officer    March 7, 2007 /s/  James    E. Hausman    James E. Hausman    Chief Financial Officer    March 7, 2007
#### § 9.2 Applicability.

This part applies to the testimony of an employee in legal proceedings in which the United States is a party. It also applies in legal proceedings between private litigants to requests or demands for testimony or records concerning information acquired in the course of an employee performing official duties or because of the employee's official status. This part does not apply to any legal proceeding in which an employee is to testify as to facts or events that are in no way related to the employee's official duties or the functions of the Department. Nor does it apply to Congressional demands for testimony or documents.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 498 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 201
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 498

                          [Report No. 107-608]

  Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4965) to prohibit the 
          procedure commonly known as partial-birth abortion.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 23, 2002

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4965) to prohibit the 
          procedure commonly known as partial-birth abortion.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 4965) to prohibit the procedure commonly known as 
partial-birth abortion. The bill shall be considered as read for 
amendment. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) two hours 
of debate on the bill equally divided and controlled by the chairman 
and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; and (2) 
one motion to recommit.

                                                 House Calendar No. 201

107th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 498

                          [Report No. 107-608]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4965) to prohibit the 
          procedure commonly known as partial-birth abortion.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 23, 2002

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
- Page 1
- 782010_Page_02.pdf
Page 1

- 782010_Page_03.pdf
Page 1

- 782010_Page_04.pdf
Page 1

- 782010_Page_05.pdf
Page 1

- 782010_Page_06.pdf
Page 1

- 782010_Page_07.pdf
Page 1

- 782010_Page_08.pdf
Page 1

- 782010_Page_09.pdf
Page 1

- 782010_Page_10.pdf
Page 1
From: Susan Golinske [mailto:golinske@gmail.com] 

Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 7:17 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Proposal to monitor where and how Americans invest their personal retirement monies

Keep out of this, you have regulated and severely diminished basic freedom of choice issues on 

many other fronts. This is one more example of the government overstepping its bounds.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,106
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,934
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,257
<PP&E>                                         116,219
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,233
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           123
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,432
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   129,861
<SALES>                                          7,130
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,377
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,428
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,491
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,355
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,897)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (638)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,259)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,259)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)
        

</TABLE>
T he Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western * District of Missouri, sitting by designation. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-3250SD

_____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District v. * of South Dakota. * Robert Sam Raisch, Jr., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: February 10, 1998

Filed: February 20, 1998

_____________ Before FAGG and MURPHY, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, District Judge. *

_____________ PER CURIAM. Robert SamRaisch, Jr. appeals his conviction and sentence for assaulting a federal officer. Raisch contends his due process rights were violated because th e district court failed to inform him of the possible application of a sentencin g enhancement until shortly before trial. Raisch als o raises several contentions about the instructions, the handling of discovery, and the admissibility of evidence offered b y Raisch. Finally, Raisch challe nges the district court's enhancement of his sentence for physical contact with the arresting law enforcement officers. After careful review of-2-

the record, we conclude Raisch's due process argument was mooted by the sentenc e he received and the district court correctly resolved R aisch's remaining claims. We are satis fied that no error of law appears, and the district court did not misapply th e sente ncing guidelines. We affirm Raisch's conviction and sentence. See 8th Cir. R
. 47B. A true copy.

Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
1210-AB32-2-1242.html[7/24/2015 9:25:00 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvt-kcg6

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1737

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Pat Turner

General Comment

I can handle and plan my own retirement. Stay out of our retirement plans.
###### Editorial Note on Part 587

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 587 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 587.1 Scope.

This part describes deformable impact barriers that are to be used for testing compliance of motor vehicles with motor vehicle safety standards.

[65 FR 17198, Mar. 31, 2000]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1429.html[7/23/2015 10:37:36 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvn-4706

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1429

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Zachary York

Address:

513 E AVE E

APT #4

Oskaloosa, IA, 52577

Email: zyork@cunninghaminc.com

General Comment

I am capable of planning my own retirement the less governmental regulation the better. The government has

 already proven that are not capable or there would be an abundance of money for Social Security and we would

 not have 18 trillion dollar national debt . I insist that the DOL stop taking advantage of the working class by

 passing rules and regulation that limit our ability to plan for retirement.
#### § 32.615 Conviction.

*Conviction* means a finding of guilt (including a plea of nolo contendere) or imposition of sentence, or both, by any judicial body charged with the responsibility to determine violations of the Federal or State criminal drug statutes.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         August 24, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on August 15, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, First-Class Package Service, and Parcel Select Service Contract 122 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2023-230, CP2023-233.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-18211 Filed 8-23-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                April 18, 2006 | By:    | /s/Jeffry                E. Sterba     |
|-------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                                |   | Jeffry                E. Sterba        |
|                                |   | Chairman,                President and |
|                                |   | Chief                Executive Officer |
Afghan chief executive visits CENTCOM headquarters
 By U.S. Central Command News Release
  March 27, 2015 Release # 20150308FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. -** Afghan Chief Executive Dr. Abdullah Abdullah visited U.S. Central Command headquarters today, meeting with CENTCOM Commander Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III and Special Operations Command Commander Gen. Joseph L. Votel and speaking before an audience of CENTCOM and SOCOM headquarters personnel. Dr. Abdullah thanked U.S. service members and their families for the many contributions as well as the sacrifices they have made on behalf of the people of Afghanistan and for the United States' continued support for his country.  "As a result of the efforts of your people, we have an armed forces with more than 300,000 people."  There was a time, he added, when having a national defense and security force of that magnitude was "just an idea." "We are extremely grateful to CEO Abdullah Abdullah and his team for making the trip down to Tampa to visit CENTCOM and SOCOM and to express his sincere thanks to the many service members, civilians, and families who, over the past 13+ years, have contributed, alongside our Afghan brothers- and sisters-in-arms, to improving the country's security and stability," said Gen. Austin.  "We have forged a strong bond, and in the coming months and years, we hope to pursue the many opportunities that we have built together in support of a brighter and more prosperous future for Afghanistan." Dr. Abdullah and Afghan President Ashraf Ghani have been in the United States this week, meeting with U.S. senior leaders.  Their activities have included meeting with President Barack Obama, Secretary of Defense Ash Carter, and Secretary of State John Kerry.  They also visited Arlington National Cemetery to participate in a wreath-laying ceremony at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 206 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 25, 2001.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2590) making appropriations for the Treasury Department, the United 
States Postal Service, the Executive Office of the President, and certain 
Independent Agencies, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, and for 
other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All 
points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate 
shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment 
under the five-minute rule. The amendments printed in the report of the 
Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted 
in the House and in the Committee of the Whole. Points of order against 
provisions in the bill, as amended, for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule 
XXI are waived. The amendment printed in the Congressional Record and numbered 5 
pursuant to clause 8 of rule XVIII may be offered only by Representative Smith 
of New Jersey or his designee and only at the appropriate point in the reading 
of the bill. All points of order against that amendment are waived. During 
consideration of the bill for further amendment, the Chairman of the Committee 
of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the 
Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of the 
Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. 
Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 
bill, as amended, to the House with such further amendments as may have been 
adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 
amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion 
to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), andSection 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18U.S.C. §1350), James M. Gower, Chief Executive Officer of RigelPharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), and Ryan Maynard, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of hisknowledge:

 

1.             TheCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2007, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “PeriodicReport”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and

 

2.             Theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as ofNovember 6, 2007.

 
| /s/ JAMES M. GOWER      |   | /s/ RYAN D. MAYNARD                         |
|-------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
| James M. Gower          |   | Ryan D. Maynard                             |
| Chief Executive Officer |   | Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates,is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not tobe incorporated by reference into any filing of RigelPharmaceuticals, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after thedate of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing.

 

----