alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EDSEL A DIXON

(Pro Se Litigant)

732 Weddle Dr. Grapevine, Texas 76051

682-301-0592

Rains County District Clerk

Rains County Courthouse

220 West Quitman Street

P. O. Box 187 Emory, Texas

75440

CATHY a. LUSK. CLERK

RE: Cause No. 9544

In the Matter ofthe Marriage ofEdselAmos Dixon and Heather D. Dixon and

In the Interest ofAshley Lynn Dixon, A Child

In the 354th Judicial District Court i

Twelfth Court ofAppeals Cause No.

March 3*. 2015

FILED mCOURTOFAPPEALS I

12th Court ofApp<„n, m.Wrf

m, a i ntia

Dear Clerk or Deputy:

Enclosed is the original file stamped Notice of Appeal for filing in connection with the

above matter.

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Encs. as stated

Cc: H. Craig Black,

Attorney for Heather D Dixon

2510 Lee Street

Greenville, Texas 75401

Clerk ofthe Court (w/ enclosures)

Twelfth Court of Appeals

1517 West Front Street, Suite 354

Tyler, Texas 75702

Yours very.truly,

EDSEL A DIXON ( Pro Se Litigant)
IN THE MATTER OF

THE MARRIAGE OF

HEATHER DENICE DLXON

AND

EDSEL AMOS DLXON

IN THE INTEREST OF

ASHLEY LYNN DLXON,

MINOR CHILD

CASE 9544

§

§

§

§

§

§

IN THE DISTRICT COURT

OF RAINS COUNTY, TEXAS

354TM JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NOTICE OF APPEAL

This Notice ofAppeal is filed by Edsel Amos Dixon, Petitioner, aparty to this proceeding who seeks

to alter the trial court'sjudgmentor other appealable order.

1. Thetrial court, cause number, andstyle of this case areasshown inthe caption above.

2. The judgment ororder appealed from was signed onJanuary 23, 2015.

3. EdselAmos Dixondesiresto appeal from all portionsof thefadEmentr—-——-—_.

rnLcJ (M COURT OF APPEALS I

4. This appeal is being taken to the Twelfth Court ofAppeals. J L9»rtof AapeateDistrict

5. This notice is being filed by Edsel Amos Dixon.

9544; Dixon

Notice ofAppeal

„ TYLER VEXAS

CATHY S. LUSK, CL

RespectfiflTy submitted;

Edsel Amos Dixon

732 Weddle Dr.

Grapevine, TX 76051

- Ti tn f—

2=

m

a

-n

o" • ro • D

do: : en 33 ---!__,

1 3P| 13 —1'

-o rn

o rn r.

-m X. CO o

en o <3

Page 1 of2
Certificate of Service

I certify that a true copy ofthis Notice ofAppeal was served inaccordance with rule 9.5 ofthe Texas

Rules ofAppellate Procedure oneach party orthat party's lead counsel asfollows:

Party: Heather D. Dixon

Lead Attorney: Craig Black

Address ofservice: 2510 Lee Street, Greenville, Texas 75402

Method ofservice: By Certified Mail

Date of Service:;

9544; Dixon

Notice ofAppeal

,2015

Edsel A. Dixon

Page 2 of2
#### Oliver Porter, *Appellant, v.*William A. Robinson, Respondent.—

Motion for re argument denied, with ten dollars costs.
§ 170.220 Use of award term. ( a ) A Federal agency must include the award term in Appendix A to this part in each Federal award to a recipient under which the total funding is anticipated to equal or exceed $30,000 in Federal funding.
( b ) Consistent with paragraph (a) of this section, a Federal agency is not required to include the award term in Appendix A of this part if the total amount of Federal funding under the Federal award will not equal or exceed $30,000. However, the Federal agency must subsequently add the award term if increases to the Federal funding result in the award equaling or exceeding $30,000.
( c ) A Federal agency may use different letters and numbers than those in Appendix A to designate the paragraphs of the award term.
Monthly Wholesale Trade Survey - Sampling Frame

The sampling frame used for the Monthly Wholesale Trade Survey and the

Annual Wholesale Trade Survey consists of firms.The firms consist of one or more 

establishments. We create these sampling units from data collected as part of the 2012 

Economic Census and from establishment records contained on the Census Bureau's 

Business Register as of December 2015.The Business Register is a database that 

contains records of all known establishments in the U.S.

To create the sampling frame, we extract the records for all employer

establishments located in the United States and classified in the wholesale

trade sector as defined by the 2012 North American Industry Classification

System. For these establishments we extract sales, end-of-year inventories,payroll, 

employment, name and address information, wholesale type of operation code (TOC), 

as well as primary identifiers and associated Employer Identification Numbers (EINs). 

We use the TOC to distinguish between three different types of wholesale 

establishments: (1) merchant wholesale establishments, excluding manufacturers’ 

sales branches and offices (MSBOs); (2) MSBOs; and (3) agents, brokers, and 

business electronic markets. The MWTS sample is drawn from the first group, merchant 

wholesale establishments, excluding MSBOs. To create the sampling units, we sum the 

establishment data for all wholesale establishments associated with the same firm 

identifier. In some cases, a multiunit firm has establishments active in more than one 

wholesale TOC. In these situations, we create firm-level sampling units for each type of 

operation. No aggregation is necessary to put single-unit establishment information on a 

firm basis. Thus, the sampling units created for single-unit firms simultaneously 

represent establishment and firm information.
Exhibit 10.3
 BRIGHAM EXPLORATION COMPANY
 NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
UNDER  THE 1997 DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION PLAN
 ___
 W I T N E S S E T H
    Grant of Option and Option Period    [INSERT
DATE THAT IS THE 7 TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE GRANT DATE]
 
 
 
 
 
  Termination of Service




---



##### 



Agreement of Director
 Exercise of Option
 Delivery of Certificates Upon Exercise of the Option
 Adjustments Upon Changes in Common Stock




---



##### 



Transferability
 Construction
 Defined Terms
 Applicable Law




---



##### 



The Company

BRIGHAM EXPLORATION COMPANYBy:Ben M. BrighamPresident and CEODirectorName:
1210-AB32-2-1140.html[7/24/2015 6:27:43 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvq-7587

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1634

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: John HUnter

Address:

2101 Booth St

Monroe, LA, 71201

Email: jhunter@steelfab.com

Phone: 318-387-9426

General Comment

Please leave this alone as is! This proposed change is trying to put more controls on citizens and we do not need

 more restrictions.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 208

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a postage stamp

should be issued in honor of Zora Neale Hurston.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 25, 2001

Ms. BROWN of Florida submitted the following resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

a postage stamp should be issued in honor of Zora Neale

Hurston.

Whereas Zora Neale Hurston is one of the most famous

American writers, folklorists, and interpreters of Southern rural African-American culture;

Whereas Zora Neale Hurston made significant contributions

to the study and understanding of the American South’s

folkways, and has enriched the American literary landscape;

Whereas some of Zora Neale Hurston’s literary accomplishments include her autobiography, ‘‘Dust Tracks On A

Road’’, four novels, ‘‘Jonah’s Gourd Vine’’, ‘‘Their Eyes

Were Watching God’’, ‘‘Moses, Man of the Mountain’’,
2

•HRES 208 IH

and ‘‘Seraph on the Suwanee’’, two collections of folklore,

‘‘Mules and Men’’ and ‘‘Tell My Horse’’, and numerous

short stories, articles, and plays;

Whereas Zora Neale Hurston was active in the historic Harlem Renaissance and collaborated on works with other

notable figures of the Harlem Renaissance including

Langston Hughes;

Whereas Zora Neale Hurston was also influential beyond the

literary field as an anthropologist in the American South,

the West Indies, and Haiti;

Whereas Zora Neale Hurston also worked as a journalist,

teacher, and librarian;

Whereas recent discoveries by the Library of Congress of play

manuscripts have furthered the revival of interest in Zora

Neale Hurston;

Whereas Zora Neale Hurston has been listed in the book

‘‘Black Female Playwrights’’ as ‘‘the most prolific and

widely published female black writer of her era’’, and is

seen as a major literary African-American female voice of

the first half of the twentieth century;

Whereas Zora Neale Hurston was inducted into the Women’s

Hall of Fame in Seneca Falls, New York, in 1994, and

the State of Florida’s Writer’s Hall of Fame in 1990;

Whereas Zora Neale Hurston has influenced famous authors

and poets such as Maya Angelou, Toni Kay Bombara,

and Nobel Laureate Toni Morrison;
3

•HRES 208 IH

Whereas Zora Neale Hurston has been recognized for her literary genius by Pulitzer Prize-winning author Alice

Walker and literary scholar Robert Hemenway; and

Whereas the legacy of Zora Neale Hurston has inspired the

establishment of the Zora Neale Hurston Society at Morgan State University, and the annual Zora Neale

Hurston Festival of Arts and Humanities in America’s

first African-American incorporated town of Eatonville,

Florida: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that—

3 (1) the United States Postal Service should

4 issue a postage stamp in honor of Zora Neale

5 Hurston; and

6 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee

7 should recommend to the Postmaster General that

8 such a postage stamp be issued.

Æ
<Page>


                                                                EXHIBIT 31.1


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, WILLIAM J. MURPHY, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of COMPUTER HORIZONS;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     (c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 28, 2003

/s/ William J. Murphy
---------------------
WILLIAM J. MURPHY
Chief Executive Officer


                                      73
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations filed as a part of the report on
Form 10-KSB for the quarter ended October 31, 1998 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                         115,888
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  183,463
<ALLOWANCES>                                    31,735
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               284,101
<PP&E>                                         245,915
<DEPRECIATION>                                  58,636
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 559,767
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          650,352
<BONDS>                                        939,265
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,961
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,047,811)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   559,767
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               191,069
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  753,499
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (164,753)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (727,165)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (727,165)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (727,165)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe report of iVOW, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for thequarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard M. Gomberg, Vice President of Finance, Chief FinancialOfficer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. Thatinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: August 11, 2006 |                                  |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                  |                                  |
|                  | /s/ Richard M.  Gomberg               |   |
|                  | Richard M. Gomberg                    |
|                  | Vice President of Finance,            |
|                  | Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |

 

----
1210-AB32-2-1042.html[7/23/2015 3:20:35 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-2kk1

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1534

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

It is time to get the government out of private savings vehicles. People save for years to have a good retirement

 and

to not have to depend on anyone but themselves as much as possible. All the politicians want to do is spend

 money

and they will get it where ever they can. It is not even their own money. They will retire with thousands and

 thousands

of dollars and even be entitled to COLA each year. And depending on who you are, you may get millions. All on

 the 

taxpayers dime!!! You have no money worries. You don't even have to use Obamacare!!! LEAVE THE

 TAXPAYER

ALONE!!!!!
From: David S. Flanagan [mailto:seeker@daveflanagan.biz] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 4:40 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Annuity Option for 401k & IRA monies

To Whom It May Concern:

My wife and I have worked very hard for what little money we have in our IRAs. My

mother, who is in a nursing home, and my father, a decorated combat veteran who has

passed away, scrimped and saved and sacrificed over their lifetimes so that they would

have money for their later years. They have money in their IRAs, which I have power of

attorney over.

I, not you, will decide how our money and my parents’ money is invested. Unlike the

federal government, my parents and I can balance a budget and sacrifice. We know the

value of thrift. The federal government has shown time and again that it cannot balance

a budget nor does it value thrift.  

Anyone who is not an absolute FOOL knows that inflation destroys the future value of

an annuity stream. Do not insult my intelligence by suggesting that perhaps a cost‐of‐

living clause could be added to an annuity which would eliminate inflation’s impact.

That clause would no doubt be linked to the CPI, which we all know does not reflect

reality.

Lastly, parents save their money, not only for themselves, but for their children. Facing

your Maker is not easy, but doing so knowing that you leave monies for your children

gives one a feeling of accomplishment. My wife and I set monies aside for our children

and grandchildren through our retirement accounts which they will one day inherit. So

now the government thinks that it will take these retirement monies away from the

children because it “knows better”??? I don’t think so.

I have only one three words of advice for any administrator or legislator who is

considering implementing some sort of forced annuity plan for retirement monies.

DON’T YOU DARE!
#### William E. Marsh, *Respondent,*v. Charlds F. Chickering and another, *Appellants.*

— Judgment affirmed, with costs.
§ 89.35 Administrative wage garnishment. ( a ) *General.* The Secretary may use administrative wage garnishment for debts referred to cross-servicing at Financial Management Service, Department of Treasury. Regulations in 31 CFR 285.11 govern the collection of debts owed to federal agencies through administrative wage garnishment. Whenever the Financial Management Service collects a debt for the Secretary using administrative wage garnishment, the statutory administrative requirements in 31 CFR 285.11 will govern.
( b ) *Hearing official.* Any hearing required to establish the Secretary's right to collect a debt through administrative wage garnishment shall be conducted by a qualified individual selected at the discretion of the Secretary of Transportation, as specified in 31 CFR 285.11. The qualified individual may include an Administrative Law Judge.
[74 FR 40523, Aug. 12, 2009]
§ 845.7 Hearing officer. The investigative hearing officer, upon designation by the NTSB Chairman or a Board Member designated by the Chairman, shall have the following powers: ( a ) To give notice concerning the time and place of investigative hearing;
( b ) To administer oaths and affirmations to witnesses; and
( c ) To issue subpoenas requiring the attendance and testimony of witnesses and production of documents. The investigative hearing officer may, in consultation with the chairman of the board of inquiry and the NTSB Managing Director, add witnesses until the time of the prehearing conference.
#### David B. Iserman, *as sole Executor, etc., of*James Iserman, *Deceased, Respondent, v.*Tunis D. Seaman, *as Administrator, etc., of*Jane Iserman, *Deceased, Appellant.*

Order granting injunction reversed, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Barnard,

P.'J. Dykman, J., not sitting.