alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Aug. 24: Military airstrikes continue against ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published Aug. 24, 2015

August 24, 2015Release # 20150824FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**SOUTHWEST ASIA -** On Aug. 23, coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq. In Syria, coalition military forces conducted eight airstrikes using bomber, fighter and remotely piloted aircraft. Separately in Iraq, coalition military forces conducted 12 airstrikes coordinated with the government of Iraq using attack, bomber, fighter, fighter-attack and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL targets.The following is a summary of the strikes conducted against ISIL since the last press release:Syria* Near Al Hasakah, three strikes destroyed three ISIL excavators and an ISIL bunker.* Near Al Hawl, two airstrikes struck an ISIL crude oil collection point and destroyed three ISIL fighting positions and an ISIL trench.* Near Ayn Isa, one airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed two ISIL motorcycles and an ISIL fighting position.* Near Kobani, one airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL vehicle.* Near Washiyah, one airstrike destroyed three ISIL fighting positions, two ISIL bunkers, two ISIL tunnels and an ISIL front end loader.Iraq* Near Bayji, one airstrike struck an ISIL large tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL building and an ISIL vehicle.* Near Fallujah, two airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL mortar system.* Near Kisik, one airstrike struck and suppressed an ISIL heavy machine gun.* Near Mosul, one airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL fighting position, an ISIL heavy machine gun and an ISIL vehicle.* Near Qayyarah, two airstrikes struck two ISIL tactical units and destroyed an ISIL vehicle.* Near Ramadi, one airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed two ISIL buildings and an ISIL vehicle.* Near Sultan Abdallah, one airstrike struck an ISIL large tactical unit and destroyed three ISIL fighting positions and two ISIL heavy machine guns.* Near Tuz, three airstrikes destroyed nine ISIL fighting positions, two ISIL vehicles and an ISIL weapons cache.Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely.The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria and the wider international community.The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Iraq include Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Syria include Bahrain, Canada, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and the U.S.
#### § 92.33 Recovery from other payments due a separated employee.

If the debt cannot be liquidated by offset from any final payment due the employee as of the date of separation, the DOT operating element shall liquidate the debt by administrative offset pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3716 from later payments of any kind due the former employee from the United States, where appropriate (see § 92.41(b)(2)(ii)).
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1019.html[7/22/2015 6:38:01 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-qg72

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1019

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Christopher Castellano

General Comment

Dear Sir or Madam,

I am quite capable of planning for my own retirement. The federal government has no place sticking its nose in

 the private affairs of individuals, most especially in how an individual plans for retirement. Please stay out of it.
Docket: EBSA-2010-0007 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in 

Retirement Plans 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0007-0001 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options 

Document: EBSA-2010-0007-DRAFT-0009 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: Liz Swofford 

Address: 

Austin, TX, 

General Comment 

Keep the government from getting between me and my money! I am sick of Obama and his 

Marxist advisors screwing up the United States 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: February 17, 2010 

Received: February 03, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80a8d121 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 2/17/2010
Exhibit 32.2









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBC) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Todd D. Fanning, Senior Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer of PNBC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of PNBC.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|/s/ Todd D. Fanning                                              
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|Todd D. Fanning
Senior Vice-President  &  Chief Financial Officer



August 4, 2006

---
IV

House Calendar No. 202

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 500

[Report No. 107–611]

Relating to consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 4546)

to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2003 for military activities

of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense

activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe personnel strengths

for such fiscal year for the Armed Forces, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 25 (legislative day, JULY 24), 2002

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Relating to consideration of the Senate amendment to the

bill (H.R. 4546) to authorize appropriations for fiscal

year 2003 for military activities of the Department of

Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe personnel

strengths for such fiscal year for the Armed Forces,

and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution the

2 bill (H.R. 4546) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year

3 2003 for military activities of the Department of Defense,
2

HRES 500 RH

1 for military construction, and for defense activities of the

2 Department of Energy, to prescribe personnel strengths

3 for such fiscal year for the Armed Forces, and for other

4 purposes, with the Senate amendment thereto, be, and the

5 same is hereby, taken from the Speaker’s table to the end

6 that the Senate amendment be, and the same is hereby,

7 agreed to with an amendment substituting for the matter

8 proposed to be inserted by the Senate amendment the text

9 of H.R. 4546, as passed by the House, and the text of

10 H.R. 4547, as passed by the House. The House shall be

11 considered to have insisted on its amendment to the Sen12 ate amendment and to have requested a conference with

13 the Senate thereon.

House Calendar No. 202

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 500

[Report No. 107–611]

RESOLUTION

Relating to consideration of the Senate amendment

to the bill (H.R. 4546) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2003 for military activities ofthe Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe personnelstrengths for such fiscal year for the ArmedForces, and for other purposes.

JULY 25 (legislative day, JULY 24), 2002

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 337 Agreed to House (ATH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 337

 Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 29, 2002

Mr. Armey submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following Member be, and is hereby, elected to 
the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Armed Services: Mr. Wilson of South Carolina.
                                 <all>
```
From: Doug Jensen [mailto:DJensen@MarcoCrane.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 9:37 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Lifetime Income RFI

I am opposed to the proposal that would affect my 401k and how that money is invested. It is my 

decision on where to direct my investments and no one else’s. Especially the US government. In 

my opinion the structures of a 401k are sufficient as is. 

Sincerely, 

Douglas Jensen 

Phoenix, Az.
Memo to the Docket

Docket

– EPA

- R08

- OAR

- 2012

- 0026

We had a meeting with PacifiCorp on October 31, 2013 with Cathy Woolhums, Bill L awson, Chad Teply , and Mike Jenkins representing PacifiCorp. Representing EPA w ere Carl Dal y, Laurel Dygowski, Aaron Worstell, Monica Morales, Steve Odendahl and Paul Logan

. The following are the questions EPA posed to PacifiCorp and a summary response. We have reviewed PacifiCorp’s August 26, 2013 comments and have the following clarifying questions. 1) For Naughton Unit 3, PacifiCorp has a comment on page 72 pertaining to the conversion of natural gas. D oes this comment indicate that PacifiCorp want s EPA to finalize as part of its FIP the requirement for PacifiCorp to convert the unit to natural gas with a NOx emission limit of 0.08 lb/MMBtu , which would be in lieu of finalizing our proposed approval of an emission limit of 0.07 lb/MMBtu (which was based on SCR)? Answer: Yes. 2) In addition, EPA would need to include emission limits for SO 2 and PM in its FIP. An emission limit for SO 2 is required to show that the visibility benefits of natural gas conversion are superior to those from SCR. A PM emission limit is required under BART. If EPA includ ed a PM emission limit of 0.008 (30

- day rolling average) (this limit is derived from the State’s permit) in its FIP for Naughton Unit 3 , and if EPA included an emission limit of 0.0006 lb/MMBtu (30

- day rolling average) (this limit is derived from the State’s permit) for SO 2 in its FIP , would Pac ifiCorp have an objection to either limit? Answer: PacifiCorp would not object to either limit being included. 3) For Naughton Unit 1 and 2 and Dave Johnston Unit 3 , PacifiCorp indicates in its comments on page 37 , that it plans on shutting down the units in 2029 and 2027, respectivel y. Should we interpret PacifiCorp ’s comment to say that it is requesting that EPA include these shut

- down dates as federally enforceable requirements in our FIP in lieu of a potential F IP requirement for SCR? Answer: Yes, PacifiCorp would want those dates included in lieu of a requirement for SCR. 4) Would PacifiCorp still plan on shutting down Naughton Units 1 and 2 in 2029 and Dave Johnston Unit 3 in 2027 if EPA did not propose to require SCR on these units for BART?Answer: It would depend on PacifiCorp’s economic anal ys is and EPA’s final action.

5) Also for Naughton Unit 1 and 2 and Dave Johnston Unit 3, PacifiCorp mentions in its comments on page 2 that they would either shut

- down these units or convert them to natural gas. Can you please clarify this statement ? Answer: It would depend on PacifiCorp’s economic anal ys is and EPA’s final action.
U.S. Central Command commander visits Pakistan
 By None  , U.S. Embassy, Islamabad, Pakistan
  Islamabad (April 8, 2011) — U.S. Central Command Commander Gen. James Mattis visited Pakistan to consult with Pakistan’s military leadership. During his visit, Gen. Mattis met with Chief of the Army Staff, Gen. Ashfaq Kayani and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee General Khalid Wynne.  They discussed the security assistance mission of the Office of the Defense Representative to Pakistan and exchanged views on regional security issues, including the coalition effort in Afghanistan.  General Mattis and General Kayani reaffirmed their commitment to work closely together on common challenges. Gen. Mattis also met with the new Charge d’Affairs, Richard Hoagland, and Embassy staff. This is Gen Mattis’ third visit to Pakistan in his eight months as CENTCOM commander.
#### § 585.11 Scope.

This subpart establishes requirements for manufacturers of passenger cars and trucks, buses, and multipurpose passenger vehicles with a GVWR of 3,855 kg or less and an unloaded vehicle weight of 2,495 kg or less to submit reports, and maintain records related to the reports, concerning the number and identification of such vehicles that are certified as complying with the advanced air bag requirements of Standard No. 208, *Occupant crash protection* (49 CFR 571.208).
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 4:33 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

My response to RIN 1210‐AB33 is:

I will never contribute to an IRA or 401k ever again. You will not fund your out‐of‐control debt

habit with my savings through forced bond purchases of an insolvent government.

I saw this coming and liquidated my IRA last year. I hope you choke on my tax penalty!

I will never buy stocks again. You have turned the once somewhat free market into a complete

joke with your covert monetization and equities pumping through your minions on Wall Street

and shadow hedge funds. Everyone laughs about it. You are a joke! Your official government

statistics are also a complete farce.

I will do everything in my power to reduce my tax burden to the federal government by cutting

back spending in every category of my life.

I will not pay any of my existing debts owed to fractional reserve bailout banks until they apply

0% interest to each and every one of my balances, retroactively and then pegged to the Fed

Funds rate from here on out.

Good luck with your continued LOOTING efforts though!

M. Doyle
----

(2004/C 88 E/0033)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1467/03

by Charles Tannock (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(29 April 2003)

Subject:   Killing of Street Children in Guatemala and Honduras

There are allegations that ‘street-children’ in Guatemala and Honduras have been killed. These allegations are vigorously denied by the governments concerned. Does the Commission itself have any independent confirmation of the truth of these allegations and has it raised this matter with the governments concerned? Does the Commission know if homes and shelter are offered to all homeless children under the age of 16 and what alternatives are available to the children who roam the streets in these countries? Finally, has the Commission urged governments in the region to ensure that children who break the law are in all cases punished in accordance with the rule of law and that, where appropriate, support is given to reduce their chances of leading lives of crime?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(22 May 2003)

The Commission would refer the Honourable Members to its joint reply to Written Questions E-0356/03 by Mr Newton Dunn and Baroness Ludford (1), E-0086/03 by Mr Helmer (2) and Written Question E-0097/03 by Mr Whitehead (2) on the same subject.

As far as Guatemala is concerned, the Commission would like to add the following elements:

----

(1)  See page 11.

(2)  See page 5.

----
#### Margaret Lore, Appellant, v. Unemployment Compensation Commission of The State of Delaware, Appellee.

*577
      *(February*28, 1952.)

Herrmann, J., sitting.

*William, E. Taylor*for Appellant.

*Frank L. Speakman*and *Robert V. Huber*for Appellee.

Superior Court for New Castle County,

No. 798,

Civil Action, 1951.

Herrmann, J.:

This is an appeal from the denial by the Delaware Unemployment Compensation Commission of the appellant’s claim for unemployment compensation benefits. The Commission denied the claim upon the ground that the appellant was not “actively seeking work” within the meaning of that phrase as used in the Delaware Unemployment Compensation Law.

The Commission found as a fact that the appellant registered for work with the State Employment Service but that she made no other effort to find employment. The record sup*578ports this finding and it is, therefore, conclusive. 41 *Delaware Laws, Chapter*258, *Sec.*6 (i).

The Statute provides that an unemployed person shall be eligible for benefits only if he is found to be (1) able to work, (2) available for work, and (3) actively seeking work.1 The third eligibility requirement is contained in few other unemployment compensation statutes and it has been subjected to little judicial interpretation. It is not possible to state precisely what constitutes a sufficient effort to obtain employment within the meaning of the third statutory requisite. It is clear, however, that a claimant for unemployment compensation benefits must do more than be passively available and waiting for work. In order to be entitled to benefits, he must actively hunt for employment and if, after reasonable effort, he cannot obtain his usual type of work, he is obliged to search for such other suitable work as he may be able to do. Compare, *Guidice v. Board of Review of Division of Employment Security,*14 *N. J. Super.*335, 82 *A.*2d 206; *Wagner v. Unemployment Compensation Commission,*355 *Mo.*805, 198 S. *W.*2d 342, 344.

It is held that the Commission properly concluded that registration with the State Employment Service, without more, is not sufficient to meet the “actively seeking work” requirement of the Statute.

Accordingly, the appeal will be dismissed. An Order may be submitted on notice.

41 *Delaware Laws, Chapter*258, *Sec.*4(c), *Chapter*162, *Sec.*3.
From: Mel Crawford [mailto:MelCrawford@melcrawfordlaw.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 1:45 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB39

Dear People,

I have spent my professional life working with people with disabilities, first providing direct care 

to people with developmental disabilities and mental illness and now, in my capacity as an 

attorney, representing people in ERISA claims to recover disability benefits.

I have plenty of work, and choose my cases very carefully. My clients are good and honorable 

people, unable to continue working due to progressive illnesses or catastrophic injuries.

The ERISA claims regulations adopted on December 19, 2016, help, in a modest way, to ensure 

that the full and fair review ERISA promises can actually be provided.

I respectfully ask that the Secretary of Labor not delay the effective date of those regulations. 

Thank you.

Mel Crawford

Mel Crawford

Law Office of Mel Crawford

9425 35th Avenue NE; Suite C

Seattle, WA 98115

Phone: (206) 694-1614 Fax: (206) 905-2342

Web: http://melcrawfordlaw.com
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 370

Recognizing the Ellis Island Medal of Honor and commending the National

Ethnic Coalition of Organizations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 14, 2002

Mr. BURTON of Indiana (for himself and Mr. RANGEL) submitted the

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Recognizing the Ellis Island Medal of Honor and

commending the National Ethnic Coalition of Organizations.

Whereas the Ellis Island Medal of Honor, established by the

National Ethnic Coalition of Organizations in 1986, pays

tribute to individuals of various ethnic origins who have

distinguished themselves through their contributions to

the United States;

Whereas the Ellis Island Medal of Honor has been awarded

on a bipartisan basis to 6 Presidents and numerous Representatives and Senators;

Whereas the National Ethnic Coalition of Organizations is

the largest organization of its kind in the United States,

representing more than 5,000,000 family members and

serving as an umbrella group for more than 250 organi-
2

•HRES 370 IH

zations that span the spectrum of ethnic heritage, culture, and religion;

Whereas the mandate of the National Ethnic Coalition of Organizations is to preserve ethnic diversity, promote equality and tolerance, combat injustice, and bring about harmony and unity among all peoples;

Whereas the Ellis Island Medal of Honor is named for the

gateway through which more than 12,000,000 immigrants passed in their quest for freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and economic opportunity;

Whereas the Ellis Island Medal of Honor celebrates the richness and diversity of American life by honoring not only

individuals, but the pluralism and democracy that have

enabled the Nation’s ancestry groups to maintain their

identities while becoming integral parts of the American

way of life;

Whereas during the 15-year history of the Ellis Island Medal

of Honor, more than 1,500 individuals from scores of different ethnic groups have received the Medal, and more

than 5,000 individuals are nominated each year for the

Medal; and

Whereas at the 2002 Ellis Island Medal of Honor ceremony

in New York City, individuals from different ethnic

groups will be honored for their contributions to the rescue and recovery efforts of September 11, 2001, the war

against terrorism, and the enhancement of the Nation’s

homeland security: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) recognizes the Ellis Island Medal of Honor

3 for acknowledging individuals who live exemplary
3

•HRES 370 IH

1 lives as Americans while preserving the values of

2 their particular heritage groups; and

3 (2) commends the National Ethnic Coalition of

4 Organizations for its sponsorship of the Ellis Island

5 Medal of Honor and ongoing work to promote har6 mony and understanding between groups.

Æ
From: Erich Preissler [mailto:preisslere@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 11:46 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: 401(k) annuitization

Don't you dare force me to invest in bonds. Its bad enough that my 401(k) is so 

drastically limited in investment choices, but forcing MY money into bonds is nothing 

more than an overt attempt to prevent a market dislocation and perpetuating the spend 

now policies rampant in our governemnt.