alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.99 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
# 2009

# 2008

# 2007

# 2006

# 2005

# 2004

# 2003

# 2002

# 2001

# 2000

# 1999

# 1998

# 1997

# 1996

# 1995

# 1994

# 1993

# 1992
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 522 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 522

Expressing gratitude for the foreign guest laborers, known as Braceros, 
  who worked in the United States during the period from 1942 to 1964.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 11, 2002

 Mr. Ose submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing gratitude for the foreign guest laborers, known as Braceros, 
  who worked in the United States during the period from 1942 to 1964.

Whereas because of a labor shortage resulting from the entry of the United 
        States into World War II, the Federal Government issued contracts to 
        Mexican, Canadian, Jamaican, and Puerto Rican citizens willing to cross 
        into the United States to accept temporary employment;
Whereas hundreds of thousands of these men and women, known as Braceros, labored 
        in the Nation's agricultural, transportation, and other industries 
        during the period from 1942 to 1964;
Whereas the first 1,500 Braceros arrived in California from Mexico City, Mexico, 
        on September 29, 1942, to work in the sugar beet fields until December 
        24 of that year;
Whereas thousands of Braceros labored on the Nation's railroads, maintaining and 
        expanding critical infrastructure for the transportation of food, 
        equipment, and other valuable supplies during and after World War II;
Whereas the heroic work effort of the Braceros has been recognized by many State 
        and local governments around the Nation, but has not been recognized by 
        the Federal Government;
Whereas the Nation and the world owe a debt of gratitude for the contribution 
        the Braceros made to the war effort that defeated fascism in Europe and 
        Asia;
Whereas more than 1,000,000 Braceros and their families or descendants are still 
        United States residents or citizens; and
Whereas September 29, 2002, is the 60th anniversary of the first arrival of 
        Bracero guest workers in the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) expresses gratitude for the foreign guest laborers, 
        known as Braceros, who worked in the United States during the 
        period from 1942 to 1964; and
            (2) recognizes the Braceros for their contributions to the 
        war effort and for their hard work, which helped to keep the 
        United States strong and prosperous during this challenging 
        period.
                                 <all>
```
§ 80.7 Application process. ( a ) Public and private applicants for credit assistance under this part will be required to submit applications to the DOT in order to be considered for approval by the Secretary.
( b ) At a minimum, such applications shall provide: ( 1 ) Documentation sufficient to demonstrate that the project satisfies each of the threshold criteria in § 80.13 and describe the extent to which the project satisfies each of the selection criteria in § 80.15;
( 2 ) Background information on the project for which assistance is sought, such as the project's description, status of environmental and other major governmental permits and approvals, and construction schedule;
( 3 ) Background information on the applicant (project sponsor);
( 4 ) Historical information, if applicable, concerning the applicant's financial condition, including, for example, independently audited financial statements and certifications concerning bankruptcies or delinquencies on other debt; and
( 5 ) Current financial information concerning both the project and the applicant, such as sources and uses of funds for the project and a forecast of cash flows available to service all debt instruments.
( c ) An application for a project located in or sponsored by more than one State or other entity shall be submitted to the DOT by just one State or entity. The sponsoring States or entities shall designate a single obligor for purposes of applying for, receiving, and repaying TIFIA credit assistance.
( d ) Each fiscal year for which Federal assistance is available under this part, the DOT shall publish a Federal Register notice to solicit applications for credit assistance. Such notice will specify the relevant due dates, the estimated amount of funding available to support TIFIA credit instruments for the current and future fiscal years, contact name(s), and other details for that year's application submissions and funding approvals.
H. Res. 372

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 20, 2002.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 353) establishing the

congressional budget for the United States Government for

fiscal year 2003 and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for each of fiscal years 2004 through 2007. The first

reading of the concurrent resolution shall be dispensed with.

All points of order against consideration of the concurrent

resolution are waived. General debate shall not exceed three

hours, with two hours of general debate confined to the congressional budget equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the

Budget, and one hour of general debate on the subject of economic goals and policies equally divided and controlled by

Representative Saxton of New Jersey and Representative

Stark of California or their designees. The amendment in the
2

•HRES 372 EH

nature of a substitute printed in the report of the Committee

on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as

adopted in the House and in the Committee of the Whole.

The concurrent resolution, as amended, shall be considered as

read. After general debate the Committee shall rise and report the concurrent resolution, as amended, to the House.

The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the

concurrent resolution and amendments thereto to final adoption without intervening motion except amendments offered

by the chairman of the Committee on the Budget pursuant

to section 305(a)(5) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974

to achieve mathematical consistency. The concurrent resolution shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question of its adoption.

Attest:

Clerk.
1133 LoneworT# House Orrice BUILDING
TERRI A. SEWELL WASHINGTON, DC 20515
7m District, ALABAMA Hone: (202) 225-2665
Fax: (202) 226-9567

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON

AGRICULTURE Congress of the Anited States

SuscommITTEE ON

a House of Representatives 5050"

GSsaaARavic Bomoseen tad Nlensomwer Washington, BE 20515-0107

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON
SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY

‘Suscommrrtee ON
‘Space AND AERONAUTICS

Suacommurree on
Reseanch ano ScIENCE EDUCATION June 17, 2011
eto >

SENIOR WHIP

The Honorable Hilda L. Solis
U.S. Department of Labor
Frances Perkins Building

12 NO 1100
49358

Third Street and Constitution Avenue, NW =z <
Washington, DC 20210 —_ mm
Dear Secretary Solis: a

{am writing to express concerns about the Department of Labor’s proposed definition of a fiduciary.

I certainly share the same objective: we all want to help Americans invest prudently for their retirement.
However, I am concerned about reports that the Department’s proposed regulation could actually have the
opposite effect, by cutting off millions of middle-income Americans from access to investment services.
For example, a recent study concluded over seven million [RAs would lose access to an investment
professional by reason of the regulation. Other plan and IRA participants would be forced to pay far
more—doubie in many cases—for investment services.

This is a very serious issue that needs to be studied carefully. In that regard, I am very concerned that the
Department did not do a cost analysis regarding the effect on IRAs before proposing the regulation. I am
also concerned about the Department’s own uncertainty regarding the effects of the regulation on the
market.

Lurge you to perform the necessary cost/benefit analysis with respect to the regulation. Then, based on
the extensive commentary you have received and the results of the cost/benefit analysis, the next step
should likely be to repropose the regulation. Reproposing the regulation would also enable the
Department to coordinate more effectively with other agencies, such as the SEC, on related fiduciary
projects.

I truly believe that working together in a public/private partnership, we can make great progress toward
increasing retirement security for Americans. An important step in that regard is to proceed carefully and
with maximum public input on this critical issue. Thank you for your consideration of my views.

2RRI A. SEWELL
Member of Congress

BIRMINGHAM DEMOPOLIS uvingsToN MARION SELMA TUSCALOOSA

Two 20TH StmeeT NORTH 186 FirLo oF Deans Drive 205 Nort WasHinGTON STREET 300 WasHiNGTON Srreer 908 ALABAMA AVENUE 1118 GREENSBORO AVENUE

Sure #1130 Demorous, AL 36732 UWA Station 40 Wese Hatt 236-237 Manion, AL 36756-2336 FeDenaL Buwons, SuiTE 112 Fepenat BuLows, Suite 336
BirwuncHam, AL 35203 Puone: (334) 287-0860 Livineston, AL 35470-2099 Prone: (334) 683-2157 ‘Seuma, AL 36701 TuscaLoosa, AL 3540
Prone: (205) 254-1960 Fax: (334) 287-0870 PHONE: (205) 652-5834 Fax: (334) 683-2201 Puone: (334) 877-4414 Prone: (205) 752-5380
Fax: (205) 254-1974 Fax: (205) 652-5935 Fax: (334) 877-4489 Fax: (205) 752-5899

PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
I= 

### CJ2 April12, 2013 To: Department ofTransportation: I am a fairly newLewistown City Commissioner and Airport Board member. IfLewistown loses our air service, we will not have anypublic transportation out of town. I do not know who chose SilverAirways, but it has notbeen beneficial for Lewistown. The airline is consistently late. Thepilots seem to haveproblems with adverse weather conditions. I would like to see a one ortwo year extension with Great Lakes Airline as our carrier. When they were our carrier before, they flew to Denver and our hoardings were very good. Sincerely, Diana M. C. Hewitt
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                         COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION

                        Calculation of Earnings Per Share


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                      YEAR ENDED MAY 31,
                                                                              ---------------------------------
                                                                              1998           1997          1996
                                                                              ----           ----          ----
                                                                         (Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
<S>                                                                         <C>            <C>            <C>       
BASIC:

Income (loss) applicable to common stock:
Net income (loss) ....................................................      $1,889         $(2,828)       $(4,242)  
                                                                                                               
Average number of shares of common stock and                                                                   
   common stock equivalents ..........................................       3,384           3,088          2,654   
                                                                                                               
Income (loss) per common and common equivalent share:                                                          
Net income (loss) ....................................................      $ 0.56         $ (0.92)       $ (1.60)  
                                                                              

<CAPTION>

                                                                                     YEAR ENDED MAY 31,
                                                                              ---------------------------------                 
                                                                              1998           1997          1996
                                                                              ----           ----          ----     
                                                                        (Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
<S>                                                                         <C>            <C>            <C>     
DILUTED:

Income (loss) applicable to common stock and dilutive securities:
Net income (loss) ....................................................      $1,971         $(2,828)       $(4,242)
Average number of shares of common stock and
   common stock equivalents ..........................................       3,865           3,088          2,654
Income (loss) per common and common equivalent share:
Net income (loss) ....................................................      $ 0.51         $ (0.92)       $ (1.60)

</TABLE>





                                       60
1210-AB32-2-1607.html[7/26/2015 8:53:21 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jxx-cwym

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2104

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I would prefer that the federal government not regulate how I choose to invest my money. I've been able to

 choose how, what and where to invest my hard-earned money for over 20 years, and even after the 2008

 downturn caused by government and Wall Street collusion, greed and incompetency, I've been able to weather

 this through my own investing decisions. If these regulations are adopted, savvy investors will start investing

 outside of the regulated structure because fees and investing costs will increase. Always does with more

 regulation. I would sign with my real name but in the current political climate, I don't want to be harassed.

 Thanks.
#### § 665.25 Transportation of vehicle.

A manufacturer shall be responsible for transporting its vehicle to and from the Bus Testing Facility at the beginning and completion of the testing at the manufacturer's own risk and expense.
http://www.financialservices.org/
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Joseph Graceffo, Appellant.

*People*v. Graceffo, 143 App. Div. 728, affirmed.

(Argued May 15, 1911;

decided May 30, 1911.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 22, 1911, which reversed an order of the Cayuga County Court in arrest of judgment granted after a verdict convicting the defendant of a violation of the Liquor Tax Law.

*Oscar Tryon*for appellant.

*Robert J. Burritt, District Attorney (Albert H. Clark*of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hisoook, Chase and Collin, JJ.
# Amtsblatt C 152/9. J

| | ISSN 1725-2407 |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 152 |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 47. Jahrgang9. Juni 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2407

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 152

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

47. Jahrgang9. Juni 2004

---

| Informationsnummer | Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Mitteilungen |
| | Kommission |
| 2004/C 152/1 | Euro-Wechselkurs | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Inhalt

Seite

I   Mitteilungen

Kommission

2004/C 152/1

Euro-Wechselkurs

1

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE

---

I Mitteilungen

Kommission

| 9.6.2004 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 152/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2004

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 152/1

---

Euro-Wechselkurs (1)

8. Juni 2004

(2004/C 152/01)

1 Euro=

| | Währung | Kurs |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US-Dollar | 1,2294 |
| JPY | Japanischer Yen | 135,08 |
| DKK | Dänische Krone | 7,4349 |
| GBP | Pfund Sterling | 0,66840 |
| SEK | Schwedische Krone | 9,1040 |
| CHF | Schweizer Franken | 1,5229 |
| ISK | Isländische Krone | 87,36 |
| NOK | Norwegische Krone | 8,1885 |
| BGN | Bulgarischer Lew | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Zypern-Pfund | 0,58300 |
| CZK | Tschechische Krone | 31,243 |
| EEK | Estnische Krone | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Ungarischer Forint | 251,15 |
| LTL | Litauischer Litas | 3,4527 |
| LVL | Lettischer Lat | 0,6623 |
| MTL | Maltesische Lira | 0,4263 |
| PLN | Polnischer Zloty | 4,5957 |
| ROL | Rumänischer Leu | 40 758 |
| SIT | Slowenischer Tolar | 239,1500 |
| SKK | Slowakische Krone | 39,870 |
| TRL | Türkische Lira | 1 811 841 |
| AUD | Australischer Dollar | 1,7507 |
| CAD | Kanadischer Dollar | 1,6520 |
| HKD | Hongkong-Dollar | 9,5838 |
| NZD | Neuseeländischer Dollar | 1,9568 |
| SGD | Singapur-Dollar | 2,0990 |
| KRW | Südkoreanischer Won | 1 423,46 |
| ZAR | Südafrikanischer Rand | 8,0262 |

Währung

Kurs

USD

US-Dollar

1,2294

JPY

Japanischer Yen

135,08

DKK

Dänische Krone

7,4349

GBP

Pfund Sterling

0,66840

SEK

Schwedische Krone

9,1040

CHF

Schweizer Franken

1,5229

ISK

Isländische Krone

87,36

NOK

Norwegische Krone

8,1885

BGN

Bulgarischer Lew

1,9558

CYP

Zypern-Pfund

0,58300

CZK

Tschechische Krone

31,243

EEK

Estnische Krone

15,6466

HUF

Ungarischer Forint

251,15

LTL

Litauischer Litas

3,4527

LVL

Lettischer Lat

0,6623

MTL

Maltesische Lira

0,4263

PLN

Polnischer Zloty

4,5957

ROL

Rumänischer Leu

40 758

SIT

Slowenischer Tolar

239,1500

SKK

Slowakische Krone

39,870

TRL

Türkische Lira

1 811 841

AUD

Australischer Dollar

1,7507

CAD

Kanadischer Dollar

1,6520

HKD

Hongkong-Dollar

9,5838

NZD

Neuseeländischer Dollar

1,9568

SGD

Singapur-Dollar

2,0990

KRW

Südkoreanischer Won

1 423,46

ZAR

Südafrikanischer Rand

8,0262

---

(1)

Quelle: Von der Europäischen Zentralbank veröffentlichter Referenz-Wechselkurs.

---
----

----

I Comunicaciones

Comisión

----

Tipo de cambio del euro (1)

7 de junio de 2004

(2004/C 151/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Fuente: tipo de cambio de referencia publicado por el Banco Central Europeo.

----
§ 98.6 Examiner. ( a ) The presiding official at a hearing held under this part and the deciding official under § 98.9 of this part (hereinafter referred to as the “examiner”) shall be designated by the Secretary.
( b ) The examiner shall not have been involved in any of the events specified in the allegations, shall not have been involved in the investigation of the allegations and the institution of the proceedings under this part, and shall not be or have been employed by the administration, or the Office of the Secretary if applicable, in which the alleged violation occurred.
----

(2004/C 84 E/0028)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2477/03

by Miet Smet (PPE-DE) to the Council

(24 July 2003)

Subject:   Women's rights in Afghanistan

The Taliban's seizure of power in 1996 went hand in hand with a spectacular decline in the situation of Afghan women. Women were subjected to extreme psychological and physical repression in the form of a partial or total withdrawal of medical care, education, opportunities to earn a living and freedom of movement.

Many had hoped that the end of the Taliban regime would usher in a new era for Afghan women. In the European Parliament resolution of 5 September 2002 (1) it was stressed that absolute priority must be given to the situation of women in Afghanistan. Members of the European Parliament also asked for a new Afghan government to adopt and implement effective measures to improve the situation of women. The European Union also wishes to contribute to this process, and has provided for part of Europe's support for Afghanistan to be targeted directly at specific women's projects.

But a year and a half after the Bonn conference the situation of women is anything but favourable. In the country, where three-quarters of Afghans live, nothing has changed for women. This has been confirmed by Members of the European Parliament who participated in the EP delegation to Afghanistan: since the fall of the Taliban women's rights have improved only in Kabul, and over the whole country only 30 % of girls go to school.

How does the EU react to this continuing violation of women's rights? Which specific women's projects in Afghanistan are being funded by the EU? As well as supporting specific women's projects, is the EU taking other steps to improve the situation of women? What proportion of the European budget for Afghanistan is used entirely for the benefit of women?

Reply

(8 March 2004)

----

(1)  P5-TA(2002)0407.

----