alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.A

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2003, of El Paso CGP Company (the "Company") as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas
L. Foshee, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify (i) that the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

                                             /s/ Douglas L. Foshee
                                       -------------------------------------
                                       Douglas L. Foshee
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer
                                       (Principal Executive Officer)

                                       October 12, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to El Paso CGP Company and will be retained by El Paso CGP Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32

Written Statement of
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with
18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of WidePoint
Corporation (the Company), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (
the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ STEVE L. KOMAR  Steve L. KomarChief
Executive Officer

/s/ JAMES T. MCCUBBIN  James T.
McCubbinChief Financial Officer

Date: November 14, 2008
From: O'Neal, Samuel E. Contractor/SAIC [mailto:Samuel.O'Neal@PeoAvn.Army.Mil] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 1:36 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 

This proposal is ludicrous. Whether participation is voluntary or mandated is immaterial. The

invasion of the government into personal properties is patently Marxist ideology. I adamantly

insist the Department of Labor and Department of Treasury cease and desist in moving forward

with this proposal.  

Sam O'Neal
-----Original Message-----

From: twollin@att.net [mailto:twollin@att.net] 

Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2015 10:39 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Cc: Donna Egly

Subject: DOL fiduciary rule

Sir: I do believe the tremendous extra cost for advisors to do business will create unwanted expenses for 

the small investors and taking many of them out of the market. There will be bogus lawsuits creating a 

hostile environment and force many honest working advisors to retire. The legal profession will hand 

out cigars if this gets passed. Please look down line and you will see that to save a penny will ultimately 

cost a dime. Why not enforce the rules and laws already in place.......Thank You

Terry A Wollin

Sent from my iPad
From: John J. Spiegel [mailto:jspiegel@bellsouth.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 7:17 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: DOL RIN 1210-AB39 Proposed Delay 29 C.F.R. 2560.503-1

Dear Deputy Assistant Secretary Hauser:

Please accept my comments pertaining to the proposed delay in implementation of new 

regulations for plans providing disability benefits.

I have been an attorney for more than 30 years, and for nearly that entire time, I have represented 

disability benefit claimants, giving me an opportunity to see the impact of DOL regulations on 

my clients and on the claim determination process. I am strongly opposed to any delay in 

implementing the new regulations which help to provide more transparency and fairness in the 

claims process.

It is ironic that an ERISA cornerstone requirement of "full and fair review" appears to have been 

avoided in the process surrounding the proposal to delay these regulations. Information was 

provided to the DOL without any notice to the public, and without any opportunity for review 

and comment. The industry alleges that the new regulations will be "costly" yet there has been 

no publication of the bases for this claim, nor has there been a full disclosure of any data which 

purports to support this claim. Claimants and their representatives are unable to respond to the 

"data" as it is being hidden from them.

Attempting to end-run the claims process is common and deplorable industry conduct, usually 

referred to as "sand-bagging." And, it is that very conduct at work here to not just delay 

implementation, but to roll back and rescind these important new rules. This unfair conduct is 

the reason the new rules were crafted and is the misconduct the new rules are designed to 

prohibit. Yet, this type of conduct is acceptable here? By the DOL? I find that hard to believe.

DOL conducted a complete review, including a full, fair and open comment period before 

deciding to implement these new rules. To delay now, based on late filed, unchallenged 

information is unacceptable. Please do not delay the implementation of these new rules. 

Thank you.

John J. Spiegel, Esq.
----

**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                March 14, 2006 | By:    | /s/                Charles N. Eldred       |
|-------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|                                |   | Charles                N. Eldred           |
|                                |   | Senior                Vice President,      |
|                                |   | and                Chief Financial Officer |
August 20, 2015
Dear Secretary Perez,

| understand that you are moving ahead with the Conflict of Interest Proposed Rule, which will regulate
financial advisors. While | understand that you intend the regulation to ensure that Americans —
particularly the most financially vulnerable — get unbiased advice from their financial advisors, | think the
new rule will make it even more difficult for retirees and others who are trying to grow their
investments for the future.

Successful financial investing is an art. Although a select group of people find it fascinating and
challenging and enjoy mastering its complexities, the vast majority of us find it an unending mystery
with the potential to either ruin or ensure our financial future. As a consequence, selecting a financial
advisor with whom you can build significant rapport and in whom you can place your trust is critically
important. Knowing that the expansive knowledge and expertise of my financial advisors, their
judgement based on market factors and world politics with which | am unfamiliar, and their career
experience underlies their recommendations to me relieves me of the absolute terror of having to
navigate the huge volume of information they consider to make decisions on my own. In addition, they
have devoted time over the years to understanding me, my needs and priorities, my risk tolerance and
the factors that affect how, when and why | expend my resources. | count on their blending this
knowledge of me with their knowledge of the financial world. | believe that their interests in making
recommendations are related to these factors, rather than how much any one company make pay them
in fees.

lam a well-educated, retired senior program manager who spent many years working in government to
design and improve effective programs to provide healthcare services and disaster preparedness to the
American public. | am well aware that faced with innumerable choices (such as, for example, what
cancer treatment to pursue) people will search out trusted advisors — those who know them and the
field — and ask their advice. While | acknowledge the existence of conflicts of interest, | believe that in
the vast number of cases, compassion and integrity guide professional recommendations.

| urge you to reconsider the current regulation, focusing on the potential harm to those whom you are
trying to help of providing them an overabundance of difficult to interpret information and restricting
honest and caring financial professionals from performing the best services for their clients.

Sincerely,

den ee

Susan True
107 Mount Vernon Circle
Sandy Springs, GA 30338
- DOC011811-004
- DOC011811-001
- DOC011811-002
Sailors rescue 30 Somalians adrift in Gulf of Aden
 By Ensign Colleen M. Flynn , Combined Task Force 151
  MANAMA, Bahrain (March 28, 2010) — Sailors aboard a U.S. Navy destroyer returned 30 Somalians to their homes Saturday after they were found adrift aboard a malfunctioning skiff and stranded in the Gulf of Aden.USS  McFaul (DDG 74), an Arleigh Burke class destroyer on a seven-month  deployment in the Gulf of  Aden, was conducting a routine patrol in support of maritime security operations  to combat piracy on March 25, when sailors spotted the small skiff about  100 miles north of the Somalian coast.The 30 men, women  and children aboard had been stranded with no food and very  little water for nearly four days since departing Somalia. Both the skiff's motors had malfunctioned, and the stranded passengers' safety became a top priority for the McFaul sailors.    "Once we recognized there was no  threat, noticeable engine failure and lack of food and water, it  was evident they desperately needed our help," said Lt(jg)  Lamping, Visit Board Search and Seizure (VBSS) team boarding officer. The McFaul's embarked translator helped sailors communicate with the stranded Somalians. To  ensure their safety, sailors immediately took the Somalians aboard the McFaul  and prepared to return them to their homeland.  They were given a  place to sleep, blankets, water and food during the two-and-a-half-day journey back to Somalia."We gave up hope until we saw you. We are alive, hopeful, and glad to be here, " said Abdulrahman Ali Barhaaye, an elder among the rescued passengers.Helping  the Somalians became a ship-wide event. Whether repairing their engines, supplying food, water, shelter, life jackets, and blankets, or serving  them three warm meals each day, every member of the McFaul crew lent a hand.   "This was a rewarding experience," said Fire Controlman 3rd  Class Wright, one of the VBSS team members. "They appreciated our  efforts and were very thankful." On Saturday morning, the USS McFaul returned the 30 Somalians safely ashore, with  their repaired skiff, to the small fishing village of Ceelaaya on  the northern coast of Somalia.
§ 601.24 Contents of notices of proposed rulemaking. ( a ) Each notice of proposed rulemaking is published in the Federal Register, unless all persons subject to it are named and are personally served with a copy of it.
( b ) Each notice, whether published in the Federal Register or personally served, includes: ( 1 ) A statement of the time, place, and nature of the proposed rulemaking proceeding;
( 2 ) A reference to the authority under which it is issued;
( 3 ) A description of the subjects and issues involved or the substance and terms of the proposed rule;
( 4 ) A statement of the time within which written comments must be submitted; and
( 5 ) A statement of how and to what extent interested persons may participate in the proceeding.
EXHIBIT 21 -- SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



Subsidiaries of the Company, all of which are wholly-owned and are included in
the consolidated financial statements, are as follows:


Name                                           State or Country of Incorporation
----                                           ---------------------------------
Boschert Incorporated                          California
C.P. Power Products (Zhong Shan) Co., Ltd.     People's Republic of China
Computer Products Asia-Pacific Limited         Hong Kong
Computer Products (France) SARL                France
Computer Products GmbH                         Germany
Computer Products Power Conversion Limited     England
Heurikon Corporation                           Wisconsin
Power Products (Ireland), Ltd.                 Cayman Islands, B.W.I.
Power Products, Ltd.                           Cayman Islands, B.W.I.
RTP Corp.                                      Florida
RTP Foreign Sales Corporation                  U.S. Virgin Islands
Stevens-Arnold, Inc.                           Massachusetts
Wealth Scene Limited                           Hong Kong
EXHIBIT 99.2





Supplement to Registrants Registration Statements on Form S-8





In accordance
with the requirements of Form S-8, the registrant hereby supplements any discussion of the indemnification provisions of the registrant in all of the registrants registration statements previously filed on Form S-8 with the following
undertaking:





Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors,
officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as
expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer, or controlling person of the
registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the
matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such
issue.
#### Charles G. Landon and another, Plaintiffs, v. Moritz Bauert, Defendant.

—Judgment ordered for the plaintiff. Opinion by Daniels, J.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that the attached submission was served March 6, 2014 on the following parties via electronic mail:

Mr. Hershel I. Kamen Mr. Daniel A. Weiss Mr. Steve Morrissey UNITED AIRLINES, INC. hershel.kamen@united.com dan.weiss@united.com

steve.morrissey@united.com The Honorable Kris Urs Deputy Assistant Secretary for Transportation Affairs U.S Department of State urskr@state.gov

Mr. Robert Wirick Mr. Francis Heil Mr. Howard Kass AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP, INC. Robert.wirick@aa.com Francis.heil@aa.com Howard.Kass@aa.com Ms. Gina Marie Lindsey Mr. Samson Mengistu Los Angeles World Airports 1 World Way Los Angeles, CA 9004

Mr. Sascha Van der Bellen DELTA AIR LINES, INC. sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

DATE: March 6, 2014 _________________________
§ 633.21 Basic requirement. ( a ) If a project meets the definition of major capital project, the recipient shall submit a project management plan prepared in accordance with § 633.25, as a condition of Federal financial assistance.
( b ) ( 1 ) The Administrator will notify the recipient when the recipient must submit the project management plan. Normally, the Administrator will notify the recipient sometime during the project development phase. If the Administrator determines the project is a major capital project after the project development phase, the Administrator will inform the recipient of the determination as soon as possible.
( 2 ) Once the Administrator has notified the recipient that it must submit a project management plan, the recipient will have a minimum of 90 days to submit the plan.
----

(2004/C 84 E/0958)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0748/04

by José García-Margallo y Marfil (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(11 March 2004)

Subject:   Synergy in EU funding programmes

If there is to be greater operational synergy amongst the many EU funding programmes, there must be considerably better coordination between the European Investment Bank and the Commission.

Hence why has there not hitherto been better coordination between structural funds, R&D funds, cohesion funds and EIB/EIF loans? Would it be feasible to set up an independent unit within the Commission for the purpose of effectively coordinating the management of funds within the various directorates-general, and also the funding provided by the EIB and the EIF?

Answer given by Mr Solbes Mira on behalf of the Commission

(7 April 2004)

The Commission and the European Investment Bank (EIB) Group (1) have established practices to coordinate the use of their financing instruments by means of inter-institutional cooperation agreements or joint memoranda of understanding covering in particular the areas of regional development and research and development.

Furthermore, the Commission and the services of the EIB Group have been examining together, in the context of a Joint Working Party, practical ways to increase the combined use of the respective financing tools of the two institutions, in particular through more streamlined procedures and a more systematic and timely exchange of information on upcoming projects.

With respect to coordination between EIB and Structural and Cohesion Funds, a number of important steps have already been taken to facilitate the joint programming of interventions (global commitments by the European Investment Fund (EIF) in the framework of Community Support Frameworks; appropriate modulation of intervention rate; advisory role of the EIF in developing financing mechanisms for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) at regional level). As regards collaboration between the Research and Development Framework Programme and the EIB Group, the above-mentioned cooperation agreement establishes a framework for joint work. Similar agreements are envisaged for other major policy areas, notably those where EIB financing can provide a crucial complement to Community budget intervention.

Against that background the Commission does not consider the establishment of a special coordination unit to be necessary.

----

(1)  The EIB Group includes the EIB itself and the European Investment Fund (EIF).

----
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0947.html[7/21/2015 6:42:19 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-sys3

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0947

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: George Schweer

General Comment

Dear Sirs,

I feel competent to plan and administrate my own retirement. I have worked hard and saved carefully for this

 period of my life and I do not want to suirrender these funds to anyone else.

Respectfully,
§ 601.44 Posting to the docket. ( a ) All petitions for relief must be posted in the docket in order to receive consideration by FTA.
( b ) The docket is publicly accessible and can be accessed 24 hours a day, seven days a week, via the Internet at the docket facility's Web site at *http://dms.dot.gov .* Petitions may also be submitted by U.S. mail or by hand delivery to the DOT Docket Management Facility, Room PL-401 (Plaza Level), 400 7th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20590.
( c ) In the event a grantee or subgrantee needs to request immediate relief and does not have access to electronic means to request that relief, the grantee or subgrantee may contact any FTA regional office or FTA headquarters and request that FTA staff submit the petition on their behalf.
( d ) Any grantee or subgrantee submitting petitions for relief or comments to the docket must include the agency name (Federal Transit Administration) and that calendar year's docket number. Grantees and subgrantees making submissions by mail or hand delivery should submit two copies.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1346.html[7/23/2015 6:10:01 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvi-ba1l

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1346

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Alberto Chavez

General Comment

I can plan for my own retirement. Keep your hands off of my retirement 401K.

Sincerely,

Alberto Chavez