alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

(2004/C 84 E/0118)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3726/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject:   Update concerning the funds for the SAVE II programme for the municipality of Pesaro

With reference to question E-0968/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of Pesaro (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the SAVE II programme, the Commission replied on 25 April 2003 to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

Can the Commission state whether, since then and up to the present, it has received any SAVE II projects from that municipality?

----

(1)OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.

----
Coalition assists in training thousands of Iraqi soldiers
 By By John Redfield, U.S. Central Command Public Affairs
  MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla., March 31, 2015 - Though airstrikes against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant may be the most visible portion of coalition support in Iraq, about a dozen countries are contributing to the training of Iraqi soldiers, an effort that so far has produced more than 5,000 newly trained Iraqi soldiers, with another 4,700 currently in training. The coalition nations who are part of Combined Joint Task Force - Operation Inherent Resolve have committed more than 1,500 troops of their own to train, advise and assist Iraqi security forces at four locations in Iraq, according to a CJTF-OIR news release. "We want to do what we can to help change the conditions inside of Iraq and Syria so that what we see happening there now, does not happen again in the future," said Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III, U.S. Central Command commander, in his posture statement March 26 to the Senate Armed Services Committee. "The key to doing so is enabling indigenous forces to defend their own borders and provide for the security of their sovereign territory. This is the goal of our advise and assist and build partner capacity efforts currently underway in Iraq, and soon in Syria." The training courses in Iraq are six weeks long and cover some broad topics, such as leadership, ethics and law of war training, as well as practicing such tactics as reacting to ambushes, moving in different formations, and moving safely through roads and other areas where they might be exposed to enemy fire. In noting the graduation earlier this month of about 1,500 forces from a six-week training course, Maj. Gen. Paul E. Funk II, commander of the Combined Joint Forces Land Component Command-Iraq, said, "these proud Iraqi soldiers will soon be on the front line, taking the fight to the enemy, and in time ensuring the liberation of their country."
#### Stephen B. Heaton, Respondent, *v.*Village of Chester, Appellant.

*Heaton*v. *Village of Chester, 187*App. Div. 893, modified.

(Argued May 19, 1911;

decided June 13, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 11,1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to restrain the defendant from interfering with the use by plaintiff of Walton lake, a source of its water supply.

*A. H. F. Seeger*for appellant.

*R. M. Cox*and *Abram F. Servin*for respondent.

Judgment modified in accordance with opinion in *George*v. *Village of Chester*(202 N. Y. 398), and as so modified affirmed, without costs.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
§ 89.29 Disclosure to commercial credit bureaus and consumer reporting agencies. ( a ) Data on all delinquent commercial and consumer debts may be reported to commercial credit bureaus and consumer reporting agencies (see 31 U.S.C. 3701(a)(3)). Sixty days prior to release of information to a consumer reporting agency, the debtor shall be notified, in writing, of the intent to disclose the existence of the debt to a consumer reporting agency. Such notice of intent may be by separate correspondence or included in correspondence demanding direct payment. The notice shall be in conformance with 31 U.S.C. 3711(f) and the Federal Claims Collection Standards.
( b ) The information that may be disclosed is the debtor's name, address, social security number or taxpayer identification number, and any other information to establish the identity and location of the individual, the amount of the claim, status and history of the claim, and the program under which the claim arose.
# EUCOM: U.S. European Command Supports Joint Strikes on Syria Chemical Weapons Sites

/ Published April 16, 2018

Apr 16, 2018

EUCOM Release: 18-08

**STUTTGART, Germany -** Multiple air and maritime assets assigned to U.S. Air Forces Europe and U.S. Naval Forces Europe, under U.S. European Command (EUCOM), participated in strike operations conducted in Syria. The strike operations were part of U.S. Central Command's (CENTCOM) operations to deter and prevent Syria's future use of chemical weapons. Alongside French and United Kingdom partners, EUCOM personnel expertly carried out operations as part of the United States' goal of long-term degradation of Syria's chemical weapons capabilities.EUCOM Commander Army Gen. Curtis Scaparrotti said that the three nations' forces were integrated throughout the planning and execution of the operation."The strikes were the result of a carefully orchestrated plan which involved dedicated teamwork between EUCOM and CENTCOM, and their service assets, as well as our British and French partners," said Scaparrotti. "Great care was taken to assure all targets were part of the regime's chemical weapons program."The combined force deployed 105 total weapons against three targets that will significantly impact the Syrian regime's ability to develop, deploy and use chemical weapons in the future.   The following is a breakdown of the military weapons used to strike Syrian chemical weapons targets:From the Red Sea:USS Monterey (Ticonderoga-class cruiser) - 30 Tomahawk land attack missilesUSS Laboon (Arleigh Burke-class destroyer) - 7 Tomahawk land attack missilesFrom the North Arabian Gulf:USS Higgins (Arleigh Burke-class destroyer) - 23 Tomahawk land attack missilesFrom the eastern Mediterranean:USS John Warner (Virginia-class submarine) - 6 Tomahawk land attack missilesFrench Frigate Languedoc (Anti-submarine Warfare) - 3 missiles (naval version of SCALP missile)From the air:2 U.S. Air Force B-1B Lancer bombers - 19 Joint air-to-surface standoff missilesRoyal Air Force flew a combination of Tornado and Typhoon jets - 8 Storm shadow missilesFrench Air Force flew a combination of Rafales and Mirages - 9 SCALP missilesNone of the combined aircraft or missiles involved in this mission were successfully engaged by Syrian air defenses and there is no indication Russian air defense systems were deployed.  EUCOM's ability to quickly respond and reassure allies and partners is a testament to the routine training that EUCOM personnel are focused on throughout the year, reinforcing the skills and expertise necessary to respond to any contingency. EUCOM maintains its commitment to continuous rotation presence of air, land and sea forces to provide core rapid response capabilities, and deter aggressive acts, such as the Syrian regime's chemical weapons attack against innocent civilians last week. For more information about U.S. European Command visithttp://www.eucom.mil/.For more information about U.S. Central Command visithttp://www.centcom.mil/.More information regarding this operation is available athttps://www.defense.gov/News/Special-Reports/Syria/--30--
# Statement Regarding Iranian Shahed-Series UAV Strikes Civilian Commercial Tanker

/ Published Nov. 16, 2022

Nov. 16, 2022

Release Number 20221116-05

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla.****–**On Nov. 15, at approximately 10:00 p.m. in the Gulf of Oman, an Iranian-made unmanned aerial vehicle conducted a one-way attack against the Pacific Zircon, a Liberian-flagged, commercial tanker.

Though there was damage to the vessel, there were no casualties.

Exploitation of the debris that hit the vessel reveals that it was a Shahed-series one-way attack drone.

“This unmanned aerial vehicle attack against a civilian vessel in this critical maritime strait demonstrates, once again, the destabilizing nature of Iranian malign activity in the region” said General Michael “Erik” Kurilla, commander of U.S. Central Command.

A multilateral operation led by the British Royal Navy’s HMS Lancaster, including 2 U.S. Navy vessels; Guided-missile destroyer USS The Sullivans (DDG 68); patrol coastal ship USS Chinook (PC 9); and a U.S. Navy P-8 Poseidon patrol craft responded to the scene.

-30-
# Feb. 25 Red Sea Update

/ Published Feb. 25, 2024

Feb. 25, 2024Release Number 20240225 - 01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

TAMPA, Fla. – On Feb. 24 at 11:45 p.m. (Sanaa time), the Iranian-backed Houthis launched one anti-ship ballistic missile likely targeting the M/V Torm Thor, a U.S.-flagged, owned, and operated chemical/oil product tanker in the Gulf of Aden. The missile impacted the water causing no damage or injuries.

Earlier in the evening, at about 9 p.m. (Sanaa time), U.S. Central Command forces shot down two one-way attack unmanned aerial vehicles over the southern Red Sea in self-defense. A third UAV crashed from an assessed in-flight failure.

CENTCOM forces identified the UAVs and determined they presented an imminent threat to merchant vessels and to the U.S. Navy ships in the region. These actions are taken to protect freedom of navigation and make international waters safer and more secure for U.S. Navy and merchant vessels.
#### § 175.205 Referral.

A Federal agency official should inform the agency's suspension and debarment official if an award is terminated based on a violation of a prohibition in the award term under Appendix A.
Independent Auditors' Report


The Board of Directors
QVC, Inc.:

We have audited the  accompanying  consolidated  balance sheets of QVC, Inc. and
subsidiaries  as of  December  31, 1997 and 1996,  and the related  consolidated
statements of  operations,  shareholders'  equity and cash flows for each of the
years in the two year period ended  December  31, 1997 and for the  eleven-month
period ended December 31, 1995. These consolidated  financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We  conducted  our  audits  in  accordance  with  generally   accepted  auditing
standards.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes
assessing the  accounting  principles  used and  significant  estimates  made by
management,  as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated  financial statements referred to above present
fairly,  in all  material  respects,  the  financial  position of QVC,  Inc. and
subsidiaries  as of  December  31,  1997  and  1996,  and the  results  of their
operations  and their  cash  flows for each of the years in the two year  period
ended December 31, 1997 and for the eleven-month period ended December 31, 1995,
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.



                                                  /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
January 30, 1998
99.4  Opinion of the District Court of Appeal, First District, State of Florida,
      dated December 3, 2003


    COASTAL PETROLEUM COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. STATE OF

   FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, and THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES

               OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND, Appellees.

                               Case No. 1D02-4712.

              District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

                         Opinion filed December 3, 2003.


An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County, Judge L. Ralph Smith.

S. Cary Gaylord,  Tampa;  Robert J.  Angerer,  Tallahassee;  M. Stephen  Turner,
Tallahassee;  Susan W. Fox and  Charles W.  Pittman,  of  MacFarlane  Ferguson &
McMullen, Tampa, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General,  Robert I. Scanlan,  Assistant Attorney
General, Tallahassee;  Parker Thomson, of Hogan & Hartson; Roger J. Marzulla, of
Marzulla & Marzulla,  Washington, D.C.; L. Linton Morgan, of Breazeale, Sachse &
Wilson,  Mandeville, LA; Teri L. Donaldson, John W. Costigan, Andrew J. Baumann,
and Maureen Malvern, Office of General Counsel, Tallahassee;, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, ALLEN, and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.

NOT FINAL  UNTIL TIME  EXPIRES  TO FILE  MOTION FOR  REHEARING  AND  DISPOSITION
THEREOF IF FILED.
# Houthis Strike M/V Marlin Luanda Operating in the Gulf of Aden

/ Published Jan. 27, 2024

Jan. 26, 2024Release Number 20240126-02FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla.**– On Jan. 26, at approximately 7:45 p.m. (Sanaa time), Iranian-backed Houthi terrorists fired one anti-ship ballistic missile from Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen and struck the Marshall Islands-flagged oil tanker M/V Marlin Luanda. The ship issued a distress call and reported damage. USS Carney (DDG 64) and other coalition ships have responded and are rendering assistance. No injuries have been reported at this time.
§ 91.9 Distribution of compensatory funds. ( a ) On or after January 1 and July 1 of each year, each U.S. flag air carrier which has been subjected to excessive or otherwise discriminatory charges for which compensatory charges have been collected shall, upon compliance with paragraph (c) of this section, be entitled to pro rata reimbursement for excessive or otherwise discriminatory charges incurred to date, not to exceed the amount of such charges actually paid by that carrier.
( b ) The Secretary will publish in the Federal Register, at least 30 days before a U.S. flag air carrier becomes entitled to reimbursement, a notice setting forth the procedures to be followed in making claims for reimbursement. This notice will specify the form in which application shall be made and the specific items of proof, if any, to be submitted.
( c ) On or after January 1 and July 1 of each year, each U.S. flag carrier claiming a right to reimbursement shall apply for such reimbursement in accordance with the Federal Register notice referred to in paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) The Assistant Secretary shall, on the basis of the application and such other data as may be available, compute the amount to which such carrier is entitled.
( e ) Subject to the provisions of § 91.13(b), upon approving the computation made by the Assistant Secretary, the Secretary shall issue such certificate as will entitle each such carrier to payment from the account maintained by the Secretary of the Treasury for this purpose.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. GEORGE PALLITTA ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR.

Submitted January 27, 1933

Decided June 29, 1933.

Before Justices Bodine and Donges.

Eor the plaintiffs in error, *J. Victor D’Aloia.*

Eor the defendant in error, *Joseph L. Smith.*

Per Curiam.

This writ brings up the conviction of the plaintiffs in error upon an indictment for possession of liquor after a trial at the Essex Quarter Sessions before Judge Yan Biper.

The single question here presented is the propriety of the actions of the court clerk when the jury came in to render ■ a verdict.

What happened was this: After the jury retired to deliberate, Judge Yan Biper instructed the clerk to receive the verdict in his absence and left the court house. Sometime later the jury came into the court room and announced it had reached a verdict. The foreman announced the verdict as “guilty with leniency.” Counsel for defendants demanded that the jury be polled. Nine jurors answered “guilty with leniency;” two “guilty with extreme leniency;” and one “not guilty.” Thereupon the clerk telephoned the judge and was told to send the jury back to reach a verdict.

Later the jury returned and announced a verdict of guilty with leniency. Upon a poll, ten so answered and two mentioned extreme leniency.

*613The contention is that the clerk usurped, or the judge delegated to him, a judicial function, and that the action was in contravention of the rule in *Sockolowski*v. *Olkowski,*102 *N. J. L.*50; 130 *Atl. Rep.*514; *Folkner*v. *Hopkins,*100 *N. J. L.*189; 126 *Atl. Rep.*633, and other cases cited. However, in those cases the jury did return a verdict, that is, some finding upon which they unanimously agreed, and the clerk refused to accept it because, in his view, it did not meet the issues submitted by the proofs and the charge of the court. In the instant case we have no such thing. After the jury was polled it was evident that they had agreed on nothing. It was then the duty of the clerk to send them back, and his action in doing so was ministerial and not judicial. He could do nothing else. The fact that he communicated with the judge and received instructions from him makes no difference one way or the other.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
agrmtstlmtmm Ex 10-12






AGREEMENT IN SETTLEMENT OF CONSULTING SERVICES DEBT 




THIS AGREEMENT made as of the 6 th day of March 2004. 




BETWEEN:   Marian Munz , of San Francisco, California      and 




CALIFORNIA NEWS TECH , of 529 Buchanan St., San Francisco, California, 94102 




WHEREAS : 




A. California News Tech, (the "Company") failed to pay its full consulting services expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 to its officers. 




B. Marian Munz ("Officer"), the Company's President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director, has not been paid a total of $15,000 for services rendered to the Company during the year ended December 31, 2003. 




C. The parties desire to enter into an agreement whereby the Company will issue a promissory note to Officer in consideration for services rendered to the Company. 




NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES THAT in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants hereinafter set-forth, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows: 




1.   The Company hereby agrees to issue a promissory note to Officer in the amount of $15,000 with zero percent (0%) interest per annum which shall become due and payable on March 6, 2006 in consideration for services rendered to the Company by Officer during the year ended December 31, 2003. 




2.          This Promissory Note is made in settlement of all professional consulting fees owed to Officer to December 31, 2003 . This note shall not be transferable, assignable, nor collateralized. 




3.           The Company has the right to repay the entire amount due before March 6, 2006 without penalty. Repayment of the note shall not be made with funds raised from the sale of stock in the initial public offering during the year 2004. 



 

4.  The parties agree to execute and deliver all such further documents, agreements and instruments and take such other and further action as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out the purposes and intent of this Agreement. 




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed on this 4 th day of April, 2004 




California News Tech                    

 

 

/s/ Robert C. Jaspar                                                                                                   /s/ Marian Munz                                

By:    Robert C. Jaspar                                                                                                   By: Marian Munz 

Its:    Chief Financial Officer 

 

 



	 	1
----

ORDER OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE

(Grand Chamber)

of 12 March 2004

in Case C-54/03 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Wien): Austroplant-Arzneimittel GmbH v Republik Österreich (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 104(5) of the Rules of Procedure - Request for the national court to provide clarification - Inadmissibility of the reference for a preliminary ruling)

(2004/C 118/52)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-54/03: reference to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Wien (Austria), seeking to obtain, in the proceedings pending before that court between Austroplant-Arzneimittel GmbH and Republik Österreich, a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Council Directive 89/105/EEC of 21 December 1988 relating to the transparency of measures regulating the pricing of medicinaI products for human use and their inclusion in the scope of national health insurance systems (OJ 1989 L 40, p. 8) – the Court (Grand Chamber), composed of V. Skouris, President, P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans, C. Gulmann, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues and A. Rosas, Presidents of Chambers, R. Schintgen, F. Macken, N. Colneric, S. von Bahr and R. Silva de Lapuerta (Rapporteur), Judges, made an order on 12 March 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

The request for a preliminary ruling by the Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Wien, by order of 29 January 2003, is manifestly inadmissible.

----

(1)OJ C 112 of 10. 5. 2003.

----
# 10 июня 3-я армия проводит церемонию «расчехления» знамени

10 июня 2011 г. в 9:00 утра 3-я армия проведет церемонию «расчехления» знамени, которая состоится на базе ВВС «Шоу», зал «Пэттон холл», Самтер, Южная Каролина.

/ Published June 7, 2011

**ЧТО:** 10 июня 2011 г. в 9:00 3-я армия проведет церемонию «расчехления» знамени, которая состоится на базе ВВС «Шоу», зал «Пэттон холл», Самтер, Южная Каролина. Церемонию будет проводить генерал-лейтенант 3-й армии Винсент К. Брукс (Vincent K. Brooks), поскольку она знаменует присутствие здесь 3-й армии и символизирует начало операций.

**ПРЕДИСТОРИЯ:**Еще в древние времена воины использовали флаги или другие символы для идентификации отдельных военных формирований, и они указывали на место сбора военнослужащих. Проведение боевых действий и формирование боевых соединений под государственным флагом Соединенных Штатов Америки было делом большой чести. Сегодня знамена с прикрепленными к ним почетными лентами за участие в сражении объединяют военнослужащих подразделений во время построения на церемонию и указывают на их участие в прошлых военных кампаниях и на присутствие командующего и его штаба. Когда подразделение или штаб подразделения переводится на новое постоянное место службы, знамена «зачехляются», буквально, сворачиваются и укладываются в брезентовый чехол, что означает, что командование завершило операции в данном месте. После прибытия на новое место знамена «расчехляются», что означает, что командование начинает функционировать на новом месте базирования.

Основные усилия 3-ей армии направлены на поддержание военнослужащих в рамках операций «Новая заря» и «Несокрушимая свобода». Наш боевой штаб СВ дольше других имел постоянное место базирования; он проводит операции из пяти различных пунктов, в том числе из главного командного пункта в Атланте, передового командного пункта в Кувейте, пункта базирования подразделения поддержки ARCENT-Ирак, пункта базирования подразделения координации и поддержки ARCENT-Афганистан, и будущего главного командного пункта – базы ВВС «Шоу».

Третья армия находится в процессе завершения переезда с базы «Форт-Макферсон», Джорджия, на базу ВВС «Шоу», который осуществлялся плавно, не прерывая текущих операций или поддержки военнослужащих, находящихся в операционной зоне Центрального командования.

**КОГДА:** 10 июня 2011 г. 9:00

**ГДЕ:** База ВВС «Шоу», зал «Пэттон Холл», Южная Каролина

**ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ДЛЯ сМИ:** СМИ приглашены на церемонию. Заинтересованные СМИ должны как можно скорее связаться с отделом по связям с общественностью 3-й армии. **Представители СМИ не допускаются на базу ВВС «Шоу» без предварительного согласования.** Просим позвонить или отправить электронное сообщение, чтобы заранее согласовать вопрос доступа на базу. В случае, если работники СМИ не могут присутствовать на церемонии, они могут смотреть ее в прямом эфире на сайте http://www.dvidshub.net/webcast/1781