alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Phyllis Baldwin [mailto:phyl315@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 7:23 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Department of Labor, RIN 1210-AB33

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

 

May I remind you that seizing money earned by citizens, for use by the government to 

disperse any amount that they see fit to any citizen they decide to give it to, amounts to 

nothing less than Socialism. 

 

My husband and I made many sacrifices over the years to provide for our old age and 

thus not be a burden to our children. We would sooner burn the money than have it 

distributed to those citizens who chose not to work, not to save, not to sacrifice. 

 

Phyllis Baldwin 

phyl3@yahoo.com
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 16

- 00484

- CR

William S. Brown

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 1

o f Tarrant County (1422674D )

April 12, 2018

Opinion b y Chief Justice Sudderth

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

C hief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Rodney Hodge as Administrator of the Estate of Bessie Jeanne Worthy, Rodney Hodge as Trustee of the Bessie Jeanne Worthy Revocable Living Trust, Rodney Hodge, Individually, and Cheri Tye

, Appellant s

No. 06

- 21

- 00008

- CV v.
Joyce W. Lindauer Attorney, PLLC, and Joyce Lindauer , Appellees Appeal from the County Court at Law of Ellis County, Texas (Tr. Ct

. No. 18

- C

3182

- 20CV1 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Burgess

, Chief Jus tice Morriss and Justice Stevens participating

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. We further order that the appellant s , Rodney Hodge as Administ rator of the Estate of Bessie Jeanne Worthy, Rodney Hodge as Trustee of the Bessie Jeanne Worthy Revocable Living Trust, Rodney Hodge, Individually, and Cheri Tye , pay all costs incurred by reas on of this appeal.

RENDERED OCTOBER 5 , 2021 BY ORDER OF THE CO URT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.1    
    


WAIVER  


        REFERENCE IS MADE to a Stock Option Agreement dated as of May 6, 2003 (the "Option Agreement") by and
between Midway Games Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation") and David F. Zucker ("Optionee"). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings set forth
in the Option Agreement. 


        The
undersigned Optionee, by his execution hereof, hereby waives his right to acquire options for Additional Shares under Section 9 of the Option Agreement in connection with the
issuance by the Corporation of an aggregate of 677,516 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, pursuant to the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as
of April 5, 2004 by and between the Corporation, GTDD Inc., and Surreal Software Inc. (the "Merger Agreement") and the Restricted Stock Agreements between the Corporation and the
employees listed on Schedule 7.3.1 to the Merger Agreement, as well as any additional shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, as described in Sections 6.3 and 6.9.6 of the Merger
Agreement. 


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hereby executes and delivers this waiver as of the 5th day of April, 2004. 



	

 	
 	

 	

/s/  DAVID F. ZUCKER      
DAVID F. ZUCKER











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.1
## Monthly Average Polar Sea-Ice Concentration

### U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS-27 
Version 1.0

By  Peter N. Schweitzer

1995

The purpose of this data set is to provide paleoclimate researchers with a tool for estimating the average seasonal variation in sea-ice concentration in the modern polar oceans and for estimating the modern monthly sea-ice concentration at any given polar oceanic location.  It is
expected that these data will be compared with paleoclimate data derived from geological proxy measures such as faunal census analyses and stable-isotope analyses. The results can then be used to constrain general circulation models of climate change.

### CONTENTS

1. Contents - Text file
2. Metadata

This report is available for purchase from:

USGS Information Services, Box 25286, 
  Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225
  telephone: 303-202-4210; e-mail: infoservices@usgs.gov

#### DISCLAIMERS

This publication was prepared by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government, nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. Any views or opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

Although all data and software included in this publication have been used by the USGS, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by the USGS as to the accuracy of the data and related materials or the functioning of the software. The act of distribution shall not constitute any such warranty, and no responsibility is assumed by the USGS in the use of these data, software, or related materials.

---

U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
URL of this page:  https://pubs.usgs.gov/dds/dds27/
Maintained by: Eastern Publications Group Web Team
Last modified: 03.12.01 (krw)
§ 821.12 Amendment and withdrawal of pleadings. ( a ) *Amendment.* At any time more than 15 days prior to the hearing, a party may amend its pleadings by filing an amended pleading with the Board and serving copies thereof on all other parties. After that time, amendment shall be allowed only at the discretion of the law judge. In the case of amendment of an answerable pleading, the law judge shall allow any adverse party a reasonable time to object or answer. Amendments to complaints shall be consistent with the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 44709(c) and 44710(c).
( b ) *Withdrawal.* Except in the case of a petition for review, an appeal to the Board, a complaint, or an appeal from a law judge's initial decision or appealable order, pleadings may be withdrawn only upon approval of the law judge or the Board. The law judge may dismiss the case after receiving a motion to dismiss based on withdrawal of the complaint. The law judge shall accept arguments or motions, oral or written, from the parties, if offered, on the issue of whether a dismissal resulting from the withdrawal of a complaint should be deemed to occur with or without prejudice.
[68 FR 22625, Apr. 29, 2003, as amended at 77 FR 63252, Oct. 16, 2012]
#### Edward J. Kelsey and others, Respondents, v. James Sargent and others. Appellants.

Order reversed and motion for retaxation of costs granted, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 234 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     September 5, 2001.
    Resolved, That the House has heard with profound sorrow of the death of the 
Honorable Floyd Spence, a Representative from the State of South Carolina.
    Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions to the Senate and 
transmit a copy thereof to the family of the deceased.
    Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a further mark 
of respect to the memory of the deceased.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-1408 Directorate ID: 2008-SW-10-AD

Helicopter Model: Eurocopter Model SA330F, G, J and AS332C, L, L1, and L2 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 29 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The proposed actions are intended to prevent jamming of a fuel shut-off control lever 

preventing the shut off of engine fuel and preventing the parallel-mounted electrical micro 

switches, normally activated by shutting off both of the fuel shut-off control levers, from 

switching off the electrical power system during an emergency shut down.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $

Labor per Helicopter

(3x $85/work-hour)

$255

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $

Total US Fleet Cost $7,395

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Eric Haight
Copyright, Privacy, Accessibility  U.S. National Library of Medicine, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894National Institutes of Health, Health & Human  ServicesFreedom of Information Act**Last updated:**  30 June 2008**First published:**  10 October 1993**Permanence level****:** Permanent: Dynamic Content
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fisher Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Benjamin W. Tucker Jr., Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 6, 2005



/s/ Benjamin W. Tucker Jr.Benjamin W. Tucker Jr.Acting President and Chief Executive Officer