alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Oct. 25: Airstrike Video: Coalition destroys ISIL prison after hostage rescue

/ Published Oct. 25, 2015

October 25, 2015Release # 20151025-02FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**SOUTHWEST ASIA –** Coalition aircraft destroyed an Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, or ISIL, prison after Iraqi hostages were successfully freed by Iraqi special forces, with U.S. forces partnered in an advise and assist role in support, near Hawijah, Iraq Oct. 22.

The counter-terrorism operation saved the lives of 70 Iraqi captives who were reportedly hours away from facing imminent execution by Daesh, as ISIL is known regionally, captors.

One U.S. Soldier, Master Sgt. Joshua Wheeler, was killed in the operation. Three Iraqi special operations soldiers were wounded.

Afterall Iraqi and Coalition forces departed the Daesh facility with the liberated Iraqis, a Coalition airstrike struck the facility and destroyed it.

“Our thoughts and prayers are with the families and loved ones of Master Sgt. Wheeler, who died while protecting his Iraqi comrades-in-arms,” said Col. Christopher Garver, Combined Joint TaskForce – Operation Inherent Resolve public affairs officer. “The rescue of these Iraqis from a barbaric execution at the hands of their Daesh captors underscores the timeliness and importance of the counter-terrorism mission and highlights why we must degrade and ultimately defeat Daesh.”

Video footage of the airstrike destroying the ISIL prison is available at: https://youtu.be/eBJZmI1O2T4

Foradditional information regarding the mission, contact the Iraqi Ministry of Defense or the Office of the Chancellor, Kurdistan Region Security Council.
#### § 673.31 Safety plan documentation.

At all times, a transit agency must maintain documents that set forth its Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan, including those related to the implementation of its SMS, and results from SMS processes and activities. A transit agency must maintain documents that are included in whole, or by reference, that describe the programs, policies, and procedures that the transit agency uses to carry out its Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan. These documents must be made available upon request by FTA or other Federal entity, or a State or State Safety Oversight Agency having jurisdiction. A transit agency must maintain these documents for a minimum of three years after they are created.
From: Robert OConnor [mailto:rpatoconnor@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 8:35 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

To: ERISA Trustees 

From: Bitter Senior Citizen 

You guys are killing me. Look, the Fed's QE MBS buying program has driven the 

dividends on my GNMA to 2.5%. Right now my IRA income stream is only 60% of what 

it used to be before QE. With your recent proposal to permit MM fund managers to 

refuse fund holders to redeem cash at any time, I've had to restructure my IRA 

distribution strategy from a monthly income stream to an annual lump-sum distribution. 

Fortunately, I am retired and have web-connectivity and so far have been able to make 

tactical IRA changes to avoid your traps. 

Now you want to annuitize my IRA nest egg. Let me ask you a question. Is your plan 

seeking to privatize my IRA by turning it over to the custody of a private insurance 

company? If that is so, then I've got major heartburn over this plan. Do you realize that as 

an unsecured creditor (which I would be) to a private insurer, my fate would depend 

solely on the solvency of the insurer? With the recent revelation that the use of CDS was 

fairly wide spread throughout AIG (not just the FP division), might I not assume such 

practice may be widespread throughout the whole insurance industry? To that I say, your 

hare-brained scheme is fraught with systemic risk, and I do not support this proposal and 

will encourage all of my friends and colleagues to do likewise. 

Now let me also say that as a senior citizen with fairly serious health issues, I have taken 

comfort in the knowledge that after my final demise my heirs would be able to share the 

remainder of my IRA nest egg. In fact, their distributions would continue to receive tax 

deferred treatment until they would be of legal age to begin withdrawals. Needless to say 

your annuitization proposition would drive a stake right through the heart of my estate 

plan to the detriment of my heirs. To this I say, you are declaring war on my family and I 

will do whatever it takes to protect them. 

Finally, you and I both know what this annuitization smoke screen is all about. It 

certainly is not about establishing a benefit for me to safeguard a guaranteed lifetime 

income stream. Quite the contrary. This all about the confiscation of wealth to enable 

financing future Treasury purchases, in order to avoid the inevitable failure of the 

Treasury auction process. This is your pathetic strategy to buy a little more time before 

the inevitable end of the US debt Ponzi scheme. To this I say, I'd rather you allow the 

Fed to devalue the dollar to zero so that all of our debt could be retired and we could start 

on a fresh page. 

Yours Truly, 

BSS
# U.S. Military, Partner Nations Conduct Airstrikes Against ISIL in Syria

/ Published Sept. 30, 2014

**TAMPA, Fla., Sept. 23** — U.S. military forces and partner nations, including the Kingdom of Bahrain, the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, undertook military action against ISIL terrorists in Syria overnight, using a mix of fighter, bomber, remotely piloted aircraft and Tomahawk Land Attack Missiles to conduct 14 strikes against ISIL targets.

The strikes destroyed or damaged multiple ISIL targets in the vicinity of Ar Raqqah, Dayr az Zawr, Al Hasakah, and Abu Kamal and included ISIL fighters, training compounds, headquarters and command and control facilities, storage facilities, a finance center, supply trucks and armed vehicles.

To conduct these strikes, the United States employed 47 TLAMs launched from USS Arleigh Burke and USS Philippine Sea operating from international waters in the Red Sea and North Arabian Gulf, as well as U.S. Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps fighter, remotely piloted and bomber aircraft deployed to the U.S. Central Command area of operations. In addition, the Kingdom of Bahrain, the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates also participated in or supported the airstrikes against ISIL targets.  All aircraft safely exited the strike areas.

Also, in Iraq yesterday, U.S. military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists, using attack aircraft to conduct four airstrikes. The airstrikes destroyed two ISIL Humvees, an ISIL armed vehicle and an ISIL fighting position southwest of Kirkuk. All aircraft exited the strike areas safely. To date, U.S. Central Command has conducted a total of 194 airstrikes across Iraq against ISIL.

The United States conducted these strikes as part of the President's comprehensive strategy to degrade and ultimately defeat ISIL.  Going forward, the U.S. military will continue to conduct targeted airstrikes against ISIL in Syria and Iraq as local forces go on the offensive against this terrorist group.

Separately, the United States has also taken action to disrupt the imminent attack plotting against the United States and Western interests conducted by a network of seasoned al-Qa'ida veterans - sometimes referred to as the Khorasan Group - who have established a safe haven in Syria to develop external attacks, construct and test improvised explosive devices and recruit Westerners to conduct operations. These strikes were undertaken only by U.S. assets.

In total, U.S. Central Command conducted eight strikes against Khorasan Group targets west of Aleppo to include training camps, an explosives and munitions production facility, a communication building and command and control facilities.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Colonial
  Commercial Corp. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003
  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
  "Report"), I, James W. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
  certify, pursuant to section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section
  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

  By: /S/ JAMES W. STEWART
      ---------------------------

  Name:  JAMES W. STEWART
      ---------------------------
         Chief Financial Officer
         April 14, 2004



<PAGE>
Exhibit
21



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANTS



|Name                                |  | State of Incorporation or Organization
|----------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|                                   
|TNP                                 |  |                                       
|                                   
|Texas-New Mexico Power Company      |  | Texas                                 
|                                   
|Facility Works, Inc.                |  | Texas                                 
|                                   
|TNP Operating Company               |  | Texas                                 
|                                   
|First Choice Power, Inc.            |  | Texas                                 
|                                   
|TNMP                                |  |                                       
|                                   
|Texas Generating Company, L.P.      |  | Texas                                 
|                                   
|Texas Generating Company II, L.L.C. |  | Texas
----

(2004/C 84 E/0462)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0436/04

by Michl Ebner (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(18 February 2004)

Subject:   EURO 2

Under Directive 1999/96/EC (1) stricter emission limits for new heavy goods vehicles will be introduced in two phases. In the first phase, EURO 4, nitrogen oxide emissions will have to decrease by 30 % and particulate emissions by 80 % of current levels from 2006 onwards.

The second phase, EURO 5, which will apply to all new heavy goods vehicles from October 2009, requires a 60 % reduction in nitrogen oxide emissions. The Commission is also looking at a further phase in reducing emissions, EURO 6, which is being considered for 2012-2013.

When is the Commission thinking, for example, of applying these standards, which aim to reduce emissions from new vehicles only, to older vehicles in the EURO 2 category or taking these highly polluting vehicles off the road?

----

(1)OJ L 44, 16.2.2000, p. 1.

----
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

August 9, 2000 Session

CITY OF CHATTANOOGA v. KEVIN DAVIS 

 Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County

No. 225103 Douglas A. Meyer, Judge

FILED OCTOBER 31, 2000

No. E2000-00664-COA-R3-CV

HOUSTON M. GODDARD, P.J., Concurring

I concur in the opinion ofJudge Susano because I believe he has accurately articulated

the present state of Tennessee law on the subject at hand. I also concur in the dissenting opinion of

Judge Franks, which urges the Supreme Court to accept this case if an application for permission to

appeal is requested so that a definitive and authoritative rule may be enunciated as to this significant

constitutional question.

_________________________________________

HOUSTON M. GODDARD, PRESIDING JUDGE
§ 375.705 If a shipment is transported on more than one vehicle, what charges may I collect at delivery? ( a ) At your discretion, you may do one of the following three things: ( 1 ) You may defer the collection of all charges until you deliver the entire shipment.
( 2 ) If you have determined the charges for the entire shipment, you may collect charges for the portion of the shipment tendered for delivery. You must determine the percentage of the charges for the entire shipment represented by the portion of the shipment tendered for delivery.
( 3 ) If you cannot reasonably calculate the charges for the entire shipment, you must determine the charges for the portion of the shipment being delivered. You must collect this amount. The total charges you assess for the transportation of the separate portions of the shipment must not be more than the charges due for the entire shipment.
( b ) In the event of the loss or destruction of any part of a shipment transported on more than one vehicle, you must collect the charges as provided in § 375.707.
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 19 February 2004

in Case T-19/03: Spyridoula Konstantopoulou v Court of Justice (1)

(Officials - Open competitions - Non-admission to the oral test)

(2004/C 106/128)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-19/03: Spyridoula Konstantopoulou, residing in Ioannina (Greece), represented by E. Boigelot, lawyer, against Court of Justice of the European Communities (Agent: M. Schauss) – application for annulment of the decision of the selection board in Open Competition LA/14 of the Court of Justice of 23 October 2002 – the Court of First Instance (fourth Chamber), composed of V. Tiili, President, P. Mengozzi and M. Vilaras, Judges; I. Natsinas, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 19 February 2004, in which it:

----

(1)OJ No C 83 of 5. 4. 2003.

----
§ 837.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This part sets forth procedures to be followed when requesting material for use in legal proceedings (including administrative proceedings) in which the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB or Board) is not a party, and procedures to be followed by the employee upon receipt of a subpoena, order, or other demand (collectively referred to here as a demand) by a court or other competent authority or by a private litigant. “Material,” as used in this part, means any type of physical or documentary evidence, including but not limited to paper documents, electronic media, videotapes, audiotapes, etc.
( b ) The purposes of this part are to: ( 1 ) Conserve the time of employees for conducting official business;
( 2 ) Minimize the possibility of involving the NTSB in controversial issues not related to its mission;
( 3 ) Maintain the impartiality of the Board among private litigants;
( 4 ) Avoid spending the time and money of the United States for private purposes; and
( 5 ) To protect confidential, sensitive information, and the deliberative processes of the Board.
§ 382.119 Stand-down waiver provision. ( a ) Employers are prohibited from standing employees down, except consistent with a waiver from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration as required under this section.
( b ) An employer subject to this part who seeks a waiver from the prohibition against standing down an employee before the MRO has completed the verification process shall follow the procedures in 49 CFR 40.21. The employer must send a written request, which includes all of the information required by that section to the Administrator, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
( c ) The final decision whether to grant or deny the application for a waiver will be made by the Administrator or the Administrator's designee.
( d ) After a decision is signed by the Administrator or the Administrator's designee, the employer will be sent a copy of the decision, which will include the terms and conditions for the waiver or the reason for denying the application for a waiver.
( e ) Questions regarding waiver applications should be directed to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Office of Safety Programs (MC-SS), 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
[66 FR 43103, Aug. 17, 2001, as amended at 72 FR 55700, Oct. 1, 2007; 87 FR 59035, Sept. 29, 2022]
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 273 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      October 31, 2001.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2647) making 
appropriations for the Legislative Branch for the fiscal year ending September 
30, 2002, and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference 
report and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be 
considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 99.1



                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Unitrend, Inc.  (The
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date
hereof  (the  Report),  I,  Conrad  A.H.  Jelinger, Chief  Executive
Officer  and  Interim  Chief  Financial  Officer  of Unitrend, Inc.,
certify, pursuant  to 18  U.S.C. ss. 1350,  as  adopted  pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained  in  the  Report fairly presents,
in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of Unitrend, Inc.

                                 /s/  Conrad A.H. Jelinger
                                 -----------------------------
                                 Conrad A.H. Jelinger
November 14, 2005
                                 Chief Executive Officer, Interim
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 President
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theaccompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Computer Horizons Corp.(the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the “Annual Report”),I, William J. Murphy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify tothe best of my knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) underthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:

 

1.the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m or78o(d)); and

 

2. the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | March 16, 2005     | /s/  William J.  Murphy |
|--------|-------------------------|------------------------------|
|   | WILLIAM J. MURPHY       |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

This certificationaccompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required bysuch Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  Such certification will not be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, asamended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Companyspecifically incorporates it by reference.

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1925 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1925

                For the relief of Thomas McDermott, Sr.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 1995

  Mr. Petri introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                For the relief of Thomas McDermott, Sr.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF PURCHASE.

    Thomas McDermott, Senior, of Oshkosh, Wisconsin, is authorized to 
purchase, at fair market value, the real property of the United States 
in Grant County, New Mexico, to which Mr. McDermott's mineral patent 
application applies and the Bureau of Land Management of the Department 
of the Interior is directed to enter into negotiations with Mr. 
McDermott for the purchase of such real property. Such application is 
Mr. McDermott's application filed under the Act of May 10, 1872 (30 
U.S.C. 22 et seq.) (referred to as the ``1872 Mining Law'') identified 
as mineral patent application NMNM 78359. Such purchase shall be made 
not later than 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```