alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6486

LARRY JAMES TYLER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RICHARD JONES,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Florence. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (4:17-cv-00404-MGL)

Submitted: August 17, 2017 Decided: August 22, 2017

Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry James Tyler, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Larry James Tyler appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation 

of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. Tyler v. Jones, No. 4:17-cv-00404-MGL (D.S.C. Mar. 30, 

2017). We deny Tyler’s request for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Monthly Wholesale Trade Survey – Imputation Methods 

A potential source of bias in the estimates is nonresponse. Nonresponse is 

defined as the inability to obtain all the intended measurements or responses 

about all selected units. Two types of nonresponse are often distinguished. Unit 

nonresponse is used to describe the inability to obtain any of the substantive 

measurements about a sampled unit. In most cases of unit nonresponse, the 

questionnaire was never returned to the Census Bureau after several attempts to 

elicit a response. Item nonresponse occurs either when a question is 

unanswered or the response to the question fails computer or analyst edits. 

For both unit and item nonresponse, a missing value is replaced by a predicted 

value obtained from an appropriate model for nonresponse. This procedure is 

called imputation and uses survey data and administrative data as input. In

any given month, imputed data amounts to approximately 30 percent for both

the total monthly wholesale sales estimate and the total wholesale end-of-month

inventory estimate.
#### In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Edward F. De Lancey, as the executor of the last will and testament of Elizabeth C. De Lancey, deceased.

Decree of surrogate affirmed, with costs to the respondent. Opinion by Smith, P. J.
#### § 525.5 Limitation on eligibility.

Any manufacturer that manufactures (whether or not in the customs territory of the United States) 10,000 or more passenger automobiles in the second model year preceding an affected model year or in the affected model year is ineligible for an exemption for that affected model year.
```

[109th Congress Public Law 117]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ117.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 2526]]

Public Law 109-117
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To amend Public Law 89-366 to allow for an adjustment in the number of 
         free roaming horses permitted in Cape Lookout National 
             Seashore. <<NOTE: Dec. 1, 2005 -  [H.R. 126]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT IN NUMBER OF FREE ROAMING HORSES PERMITTED IN CAPE 
            LOOKOUT NATIONAL SEASHORE, NORTH CAROLINA.

    (a) In General.--The first subsection (b) of section 5 of Public Law 
89-366 (16 U.S.C. 459g-4) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``100 free roaming 
        horses'' and inserting ``not less than 110 free roaming horses, 
        with a target population of between 120 and 130 free roaming 
        horses,'';
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking subparagraph (B) and 
        inserting the following new subparagraph:
            ``(B) unless removal is carried out as part of a plan to 
        maintain the viability of the herd; or''; and
            (3) in paragraph (5), by striking ``100'' and inserting 
        ``110''.

    (b) Repeal of Duplicate Subsection.--Section 5 of Public Law 89-366 
is further amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``(a)'' after ``(a)''; 
        and
            (2) by striking the second subsection (b).

    Approved December 1, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 126:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

SENATE REPORTS: No. 109-154 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            Mar. 14, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 16, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1231.html[7/22/2015 4:08:28 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jve-8ev2

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1231

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: LaRene Mason

Address:

731 Shalimar Dr. Apt. D

Mt. Vernon, OH, 43050

Email: lareneann@live.com

Phone: 7403986258

General Comment

I understand that the Department of Labor is beginning to enact regulations that will restrict how I use my

 retirement money. I am capable of planning for my own retirement and I do not want the government doing any

 part of it for me. 

Perhaps the government should go back to the roots of what the founding fathers intended for the citizens of this

 country. Where government is concerned, less is more.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 491

Supporting the use of fair trade certified coffee.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 17, 2002

Mr. STARK (for himself, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. BROWN of

Ohio, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Ms. MCKINNEY, Ms.

LEE, Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. DOGGETT, Mr.

MCGOVERN, and Mr. FARR of California) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform, and

in addition to the Committees on House Administration and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of

the committee concerned

RESOLUTION

Supporting the use of fair trade certified coffee.

Whereas in the context of the global economy, consumer

choices affect communities and the environment throughout the world;

Whereas most small-scale coffee farmers who receive local

market prices for their harvests can not meet their costs

of production and are therefore forced into a cycle of poverty and debt;

Whereas dire poverty is prevalent in Africa, Asia, Latin

America, and other areas of the world;
2

•HRES 491 IH

Whereas large-scale, nonsustainable coffee farming leads to

environmental problems, such as the contamination of air

and water supplies from pesticide poisoning and the extinction of some bird species due to the destruction of

their habitats;

Whereas fair trade certified coffee is coffee that has been

purchased without the participation of intermediate dealers and at a minimum price per pound of $1.26, and

therefore enables small-scale farmers to sustain their

farms and to avoid debt;

Whereas TransFair USA, a nonprofit organization, is a fair

trade certification organization in the United States, has

certified over 13,000,000 pounds of fair trade coffee

since its founding in 1998, and has worked with more

than 130 companies to generate more than $10,000,000

in additional income for small coffee farmers;

Whereas other organizations also have certification standards, some of which exceed those of TransFair USA;

Whereas TransFair USA encourages the cultivation of coffee

under organic conditions and under shade canopies which

preserve trees and birds;

Whereas with the profits generated from receiving a fair

price, farmers can invest in community development,

health care, education, and environmental responsibility;

and

Whereas the Congress, the executive branch, and the judiciary have a responsibility to set a high standard of ethics

with regard to their economic activities and, therefore, to

ensure that the goods and services they purchase are produced in the fairest manner possible: Now, therefore, be

it
3

•HRES 491 IH

1 Resolved, That—

2 (1) the United States House of Representatives

3 recommends the restriction of coffee purchases by all

4 executive, legislative, and judicial branch offices and

5 entities to brands that are fair trade certified; and

6 (2) the Congress, the executive branch, and the

7 judiciary should provide information to the public

8 about the importance of fair trade certified coffee.

Æ
1210-AB32-2-1596.html[7/26/2015 8:44:23 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jxw-z9mf

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2093

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Zane and Pat Gideon

General Comment

Leave our IRA and 401k's alone. The only good government envolvement is no government involvement.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, we the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively of Communications
Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certify:



(1) That the accompanying Annual Report of the Company on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2019 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                     |                                                      | 
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------- | 
|                     | /s/ Roger H.D. Lacey                                 | 
|                     | Roger H.D. Lacey                                     | 
|Date: March 17, 2020 | Chief Executive Officer                              | 
|                     |                                                      | 
|                     | /s/ Mark D. Fandrich                                 | 
|                     | Mark D. Fandrich                                     | 
|Date: March 17, 2020 | Group Business President and Chief Financial Officer | 



62
#### Mary J. Olmstead, Respondent, v. Benjamin E. Olmstead, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by Brady, J.
# 386 ESFS: This is a simulation

/ Published April 26, 2021
ALI AL SALEM AIR BASE, Kuwait, 
Calm, collected and ready to walk into the unknown.A defender is trained to be mentally prepared to handle almost any situation they might encounter. Continuous training and exposure to countless scenarios, with the help of technology, allows defenders to play through responses to see what works best in handling and deescalating situations.Street Smarts Virtual Reality is a training platform that provides a three dimensional, fully immersive, simulated experience for defenders assigned to the 386th Expeditionary Security Forces Squadron.When utilizing the platform, defenders are placed in a three-dimensional digital environment, so detailed that they can look and move in any direction within a defined area of training space.“I’m a fan of VR so I love this training,” said Staff Sgt. Dashawn Davis, 386th ESFS Counter small Unmanned Aerial Systems noncommission officer in charge. “This VR, versus our previous training simulator, gives a much better immersion into the training scenarios we’re placed in.”The technology mimics real-world situations ranging from active shooter to traffic stops. Instructors using the workstation can manipulate scenario types, weapons and environments. This gives defenders the opportunity to through various options to deescalate situations.“This form of training is important because defenders experience realistic stress in a safe environment,” said Brittany D. Daigre, 386th ESFS security trainer. “Using this technology we are able to test a defender’s response and reinforce their ability to use proper tactics, use of force, verbal commands and de-escalation techniques necessary for effective training.”The system also allows the instructor to intervene with the subject’s behavior, pressuring the defender to choose whether to intensify or de-escalate a scenario.“My favorite element of the VR system is the review mode capability. After a training scenario is complete, I can pause and replay scenarios from multiple vantage points, which allows us to analyze the defender’s decision making, accuracy and overall performance.” Daigre said. “As a trainer, this is a key component in providing effective feedback.”Training and exposure to an endless amount of realistic scenarios, that require a variety of tactics, allows defenders to strengthen their skills, making their responses second nature when faced with situations.
----

(2004/C 88 E/0132)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2988/03

by Bart Staes (Verts/ALE) and Jan Dhaene (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(9 October 2003)

Subject:   Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade Action Plan

On 21 May 2003, the Commission published the FLEGT Action Plan. Various NGOs involved with this issue, as well as a number of Member States which have taken the lead in the worldwide campaign to stop illegal logging, regard that document as an important step forward and as a point of departure for further legislative activity.

However, after the document (1) had been published, nothing more was heard, and we have the impression that the Commission took no further measures for the implementation of the Action Plan.

What objectives does the Commission want to attain, and within what timescale, in order to implement the FLEGT Action Plan? Within that timescale, what are the key activities between now and June 2004?

Which DG will be responsible for the implementation of the Action Plan, and what resources are available for that purpose?

Is the Commission planning further legislation in connection with the problems addressed by FLEGT?

Illegal logging is a fairly significant problem in the accession countries as well. Is the Commission planning to take specific measures with a view to solving the problem in those countries, both before and after accession?

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(5 December 2003)

The Commission has worked to ensure swift follow-up to the EU Action Plan for Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT). Council Conclusions were adopted at the Agriculture Council on 13 October 2003. The Commission still awaits a response from the Parliament.

Wide stakeholder consultations have been initiated, including detailed contacts with Member States, nongovernment organisations and European wood industries. Contacts have also been initiated with potential partner countries in major timber-producing regions of the world, with encouraging results. Discussions with Indonesia are in a particularly advanced stage.

To facilitate engagement with Africa, the Commission also recently provided a EUR 500 000 grant to support the Africa Ministerial Conference for Forest Law Enforcement and Governance (AFLEG), at which more than 30 African nations set out their firm commitment to combat illegal logging.

To answer the additional specific points raised in the question:

----

(1)  COM(2003) 251.

----
1210-AB32-2-1133.html[7/24/2015 6:27:45 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvq-7jrc

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1627

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Chris Carlson

General Comment

I have been planning my retirement for over 20 years. I do not need, nor do I want any assistance or intervention

 from the government. The government should be more concerned with living within a budget........I learned that

 many years ago and it seems to work very well.
April 1 , 2015

Mr. Cody Villalobos

Rise Optics

8 Pebble Beach Drive

Yerington, NV 89447

Dear Mr. Villalobos :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your February 7, 2015 exemption request on behalf of Rise Optics into the public

docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 0328 ) , but we are unable to process your request any further. The

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For

us to consider th e request any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and th e extent of

the relief you seek

.

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

• Any additional info rmation, views, or arguments available to support your request.

W hat You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9521

.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
<Page>

                                                                          [LOGO]


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 10 to the
registration statement on Form N-4 (No. 333-20343) (the "Registration
Statement") of our report dated February 20, 2004, relating to the financial
statements of First Fortis Life Insurance Company, which appears in such
Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the
heading "Independent Accountants" in such Registration Statement.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
April 5, 2004
4

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21-0024
STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiffand Appellee,
v. KOBY MARTELL,

Defendant and Appellant. ORDER

Self-represented Appellant Koby Martell moves this Court,pursuant to M.R. Civ. P.45,for a subpoena ofhis former counsel's disciplinary hearing transcript. Martell states that "the Nranscripts from the Discipli nary Council [a]re very Relevant to Show this High Courtthat [his counsel's] Perforrnance Fell well below the Standards Required by the Sixth Amendment ofthe U.S. Constitution[d

Martell is appealing a November 23, 2020 Order on Defendant's Post-Conviction Filings, issued in the Seventh Judicial District Court, Prairie County. Martell's motion is not well taken. The Montana Rules of Civil Procedure do not apply to this Court. M.R. Civ. P. 1. As an appellate court, this Court reviews the record, comprising the original papers and exhibits filed in the District Court. M.R. App.P. 8(1). We review the statement ofissues,facts, and arguments as presented in the filed briefs. M. R. App. P. 9. We do not subpoena records or materials outside of a district court proceeding. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Martell's Motion for Subpoena is DENIED. The Clerk ofthe Supreme Court is directed to provide a copy ofthis Order to counsel ofrecord and to Koby Martell along with a copy ofthis Court's Civil Appellate Handbook. DATED this day ofMarch,2021. For the Court. 

# FILED ton fi 9 1r191 ChiefJustice 03/02/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0024
**EXHIBIT 99.2**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
     The undersigned, Mary Dridi, the Chief Financial Officer and ExecutiveVice President of webMethods, Inc. (the “Company”), has executed thiscertification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending September 30, 2002 (the “Report”). The undersigned herebycertifies that:
     (1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.   Date: November 12, 2002      /S/ MARY DRIDI    Name: Mary Dridi  Title:   Chief Financial Officer and              Executive Vice President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2664

ALLAN L. GANT, Doctor,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FOI OFFICER, U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern

District of West Virginia,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (CA-96-507-5)

Submitted: May 28, 1998 Decided: June 9, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Allan L. Gant, Appellant Pro Se. Carol A. Casto, Assistant United

States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Allan L. Gant appeals the district court's order dismissing

his action filed under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C.A.

§ 552 (West 1996 & Supp. 1998), and the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C.A.

§ 552a (West 1996 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge's

recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Gant v. FOI Officer, No.

CA-96-507-5 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
From: Carl Gethmann [mailto:carlgethmann@comcast.net] 

Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 11:12 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

My message is short.

Keep your grubby, scummy hands off my IRA.

Carl Gethmann