alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Home
  Home
  Inspector General
 Inspector General The United States Central Command (CENTCOM) Inspector General (IG) reports on the state of the economy, efficiency, discipline, morale, training, readiness of the command in support of the Commander. The IG provides assistance, performs inspections and investigations as directed by the Commander, CENTCOM. Monitors Intelligence Oversight programs, facilitates external audits and other external oversight activities, and conducts special inspections in support of the Command’s Management Internal Control Program.**Filing a Complaint**
If you need assistance, please contact the Inspectors General Office or submit a Joint Inspector General Action Request (JIGAR) DD Form 2949 via mail, email or fax.Click here for DD Form 2949.
Please download form and save it before filling out. Send completed form as an attachment to centcom.macdill.centcom-hq.mbx.ccig@mail.mil.**Contact Information**
Mail: 7115 S. Boundary Blvd. MacDill AFB, FL 33621-5101 **DoDIG Hotline link**
Click here for DoDIG Hotline.
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
AMENDMENT TO THE ALPHARMA INC. 
EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN







The Alpharma Inc. Executive Bonus Plan (the "Plan") is hereby amended effective as of August 15, 2005, as follows:



1.	Section 11 is hereby amended replacing Section 11 in its entirety as set forth below:



11. 	Partial Year Employees.

If any employee of the Company or an SBU meets all of the conditions set forth within the definition of "Eligible Employee" (i) as of the last day of an Incentive Year except the requirement that he or she have been employed by the Company or an SBU for the entire Incentive Year or (ii) his or her employment was terminated, or interrupted, during the Incentive Year by death, disability, a leave of absence of 3 months or more, Retirement or, at the discretion of the Committee, upon the sale of an SBU, such employee shall be eligible for a Bonus Award computed (based upon the previously approved performance criteria and subject to the adoption of other rules or procedures deemed equitable in the circumstances by the Committee,) as if he or she had been an Eligible Employee for the entire Incentive Year but then reduced pro rata for the portion of the Incentive Year during which he or she was not an employee of the Company or an SBU.   If an employee transfers from one SBU to another (or between the Company and an SBU) during the Incentive Year his or her Bonus Award shall be prorated based upon the portion of the Incentive Year in each unit.  The Company Target Bonus Pool, and the relevant SBU Target Bonus Pool, shall be increased by an amount equal to the sum of any Bonus Awards payable under this Section 10.
----

(2004/C 84 E/0881)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0407/04

by Hugues Martin (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(6 February 2004)

Subject:   CRAFT Community programmes

Since the 1990s, the European Union has been financing so-called CRAFT projects through its successive Community R + D programmes. The purpose of these projects as to support the needs of SMEs in R + D, facilitate transnational cooperation between SMEs on R + D, and to encourage cooperation cooperation between SMEs and European research.

CRAFT has enabled many SMEs from throughout the European Union to come together to set up R + D projects. Hence its sheer importance.

However, now that Europe has embarked on a multi-annual programme in favour of companies, and particularly SMEs, with the particular goal of simplifying the legislative, administrative and financial measures which concern them, it appears that Europe itself no longer feels this burning obligation. The paperwork required to obtain European aid is more and more complex to handle, and once the submission has been accepted, payment takes a long time, which discourages SMEs. Such, accordingly to my information, is the case of CRAFT.

For that reason, even if strict rules are necessary in order for European funding to be agreed, could the Commission itself not make an effort to achieve administrative simplification, in collaboration with the SMEs, so that all Europe's SMEs can benefit from such programmes, whose importance requires no demonstration?

With particular regard to CRAFT:

Answer given by Mr Busquin on behalf of the Commission

(12 March 2004)

In relation to the calls for Co-operative Research Projects within the 6th Framework Programme (FP6), the Commission understands the particular needs of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to achieve an optimal and efficient procedure in processing research project applications and approving those projects which are successful in obtaining Community financing.

With particular regard to the question of the Honourable Member on CRAFT Community Programmes, the Commission would like to indicate the following:

Under FP6, the RTD performers are contractors like the SME partners, that is, direct beneficiaries of the grant awarded by the Community. Accordingly, they charge directly their eligible costs incurred in relation to their activities. No invoices are required of RTD performers under FP6.

----

(1)  Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities, OJ L 357, 31.12.2002.

----
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 8/23/15

Received: August 20, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8knw-69jy

Comments Due: August 28, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule- Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-4956

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Ferdinand Ruplin

Address: 

1000 Woodbury Rd.

Suite 300

Woodbury, 11797

Email: ferdinand.ruplin@axa-advisors.com

Phone: 516 358-3742

General Comment

The key issue in this matter, is whether investment advisors can render advice to holders of 

retirement plan accounts, and be compensated. We would submit, that if the advice is suitable, 

and in the interest of the furtherance of the account holders objectives, that there is no conflict of 

interest. This is a MUTUALLY beneficial outcome. There will never be ANY advice rendered to 

the millions of retirement plan account holders if there is a regulatory mandate that advice can 

only be in the SOLE interest of the account holder. This will leave millions of people struggling 

to figure out what to do for themselves, and simultaneously destroy thousands of jobs in the 

financial services industry.
Exhibit 31.2



Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer





I, Frank Dalene, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Hamptons Luxury Homes, Inc.



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and



c)

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls.



6.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: November 10, 2005



/s/ Frank Dalene

Frank Dalene

Chief Financial Officer
IV

House Calendar No. 130

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 366

[Report No. 107–374]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2146) to amend title 18 of

the United States Code to provide life imprisonment for repeat offenders

who commit sex offenses against children.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 12, 2002

Mr. DIAZ-BALART, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2146) to amend

title 18 of the United States Code to provide life imprisonment for repeat offenders who commit sex offenses

against children.

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of

3 rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 2146) to amend title 18 of the
2

HRES 366 RH

1 United States Code to provide life imprisonment for repeat

2 offenders who commit sex offenses against children. The

3 first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points

4 of order against consideration of the bill are waived. Gen5 eral debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not ex6 ceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair7 man and ranking minority member of the Committee on

8 the Judiciary. After general debate the bill shall be consid9 ered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall

10 be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose

11 of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment

12 in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Com13 mittee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill. The com14 mittee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be

15 considered as read. During consideration of the bill for

16 amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole

17 may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether

18 the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be

19 printed in the portion of the Congressional Record des20 ignated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amend21 ments so printed shall be considered as read. At the con22 clusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the

23 Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with

24 such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member

25 may demand a separate vote in the House on any amend-
3

HRES 366 RH

1 ment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill

2 or to the committee amendment in the nature of a sub3 stitute. The previous question shall be considered as or4 dered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage

5 without intervening motion except one motion to recommit

6 with or without instructions.
House Calendar No. 130

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 366

[Report No. 107–374]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2146)

to amend title 18 of the United States Code toprovide life imprisonment for repeat offenderswho commit sex offenses against children.

MARCH 12, 2002

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
#### § 452.1 Periodic examination required.

(a) Except as provided for in § 452.7, each owner of an approved container subject to this part shall examine the container or have it examined in accordance with the procedures prescribed in § 452.3 at intervals of not more than 30 months, except that for containers approved as new containers, the interval from the date of manufacture to the date of the first examination must not exceed five years. For containers approved, examined and plated as existing containers before January 1, 1985 and containers approved and plated as new containers before January 1, 1985, the subsequent examination must be carried out in accordance with the following schedule:

| Date of initial plating | Subsequent examination |
| --- | --- |
| Existing containers before Sept. 30, 1981 and new containers before Dec. 31, 1978 | Before Jan. 1986. |
| Existing containers between Oct. 1, 1981 and Sept. 30, 1982 and new containers between Jan. 1, 1979 and Dec. 31, 1979 | Before May 1986. |
| Existing containers between Oct. 1, 1982 and Sept. 30, 1983 and new containers between Jan. 1, 1980 and Dec. 31, 1980 | Before Sept. 1986. |
| Existing containers between Oct. 1, 1983 and Dec. 31, 1984 and new containers between Jan. 1, 1981 and Dec. 31, 1981 | Before Jan. 1987. |

Note:

Containers plated under § 451.14 are considered existing containers in the above schedule.

(b) Upon completion of an examination required by this part, the owner shall mark on the safety approval plate, or on the container itself as close as practicable to the safety approval plate, the month and year before which the container must next be examined. This marking must be on all containers by January 1, 1987. The marking may be by a decal, sticker, stencil, or other means so long as it is capable of remaining legible for at least 24 months. Affixing such a marking to a container that has not been examined in accordance with § 452.3 constitutes a misrepresentation in a matter within the jurisdiction of an agency of the United States, and makes the owner punishable under 18 U.S.C. 1001.

(c) The owner of containers subject to this section shall have those containers examined in accordance with the program prescribed in this section regardless of whether the examinations are preformed within or outside the United States.

[45 FR 37216, June 2, 1980, as amended at 47 FR 50496, Nov. 8, 1982; 49 FR 15562, Apr. 19, 1984; 69 FR 58353, Sept. 30, 2004]
CENTCOM commanders discuss regional security issues in Bahrain
 By Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Nathan Schaeffer , US Naval Forces Central Command
  
 MANAMA, Bahrain  - Commanders from the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility gathered in Bahrain May 20 - 22, for the USCENTCOM Commander’s Conference to discuss regional security issues and approaches to these challenges. The conference, hosted by U.S. Naval Forces Central Command, brought together Gen. David Petraeus, Commander, USCENTCOM, Gen. Ray Odierno, Commanding General, Multi-National Force-Iraq, Vice Adm. Bill Gortney, Commander, NAVCENT, Lt. Gen. William Webster, Commanding General, U.S. Army Central Command and Lt. Gen. Gary North, U.S. Air Forces Central Command, among others. At the conference, commanders discussed various issues including operations in Afghanistan, Iraq, as well as counter-piracy efforts off the coast of Somalia. "We face, in this region, a number of interrelated threats and challenges, from transnational to state-centric, to those who blur the lines between the two," said Petraeus. "At the transnational level, violent extremism is, needless to say, the most pressing challenge. Al-Qaeda and its affiliates pose the greatest such threat to many states in the region." U.S. commanders also talked about the security architecture in place throughout the region and the need for cooperative comprehensive approaches with regional partners. "Such approaches involve significantly more than the application of just military or kinetic action," said Petraeus. "In fact, they must do far more if they are to address not just the symptoms of current challenges, but also their underlying causes. The lack of sustainable economic development in certain parts of this region, for example, is not just a social or humanitarian issue it is a serious security concern as well." Piracy, threats to the maritime environment and the need for continued cooperation with Coalition and regional partners through Maritime Security Operations was also discussed by commanders during the conference. "The complex threats that we face at sea require cooperative solutions," said Gortney. "We will continue to work with our partners in the region to respond to these challenges and help ensure peace and stability in the region. U.S. Naval forces have operated in the region for six decades and we’ll be here for many more to come." -30-
Uzbekistan, U.S. sign security pact
 By None  , U.S. Embassy - Tashkent, Uzbekistan
  *Wednesday, November 17, 2010 -*Uzbek Defense officials agreed this week to a security cooperation pact with the U.S. military’s Central Command. Uzbekistan’s Defense Ministry signed the program during a three-day visit to Tashkent that ends Wednesday by Commander of the U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) General James Mattis to sound out the views of Uzbek officials, the UzReport.com news agency reported. The visit, the first of a round of trips the General plans to Central Asian countries, was spent exchanging views on regional security matters – including the situation in neighboring Afghanistan – with Uzbek officials. Mattis signed the 2011 Program of Security Cooperation between USCENTCOM and Uzbekistan during a meeting with Uzbekistan’s Minister of Defense, General-Major Kabul Berdiev. “The program outlines a series of mutually agreed-upon engagements and training opportunities for fiscal year 2011,” RIA Novosti cited the U.S. Embassy in Tashkent as saying Wednesday. The U.S. Defense Department used an airbase in Uzbekistan from 2001 as part of its military operations in Afghanistan until it was evicted in late 2005 by Uzbek President Islam Karimov in response to U.S. protests over Tashkent’s deadly suppression of protests in eastern Andijan province. The U.S. military has since exclusively used the Manas airbase near Kyrgyzstan’s capital city Bishkek. The USCENTCOM operates in Central Asia and the Middle East.
§ 7.21 What does this subpart cover? ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this subpart applies to reasonably described records that are made available in response to written requests under FOIA.
( b ) This subpart does not apply to: ( 1 ) Records published in the Federal Register.
( 2 ) Records published and offered for sale.
( 3 ) Records (other than frequently requested records) made available in a reading room.
( 4 ) Records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes and covered by the disclosure exemption described in § 7.23(c)(7)(A) if— ( i ) The investigation or proceeding involves a possible violation of criminal law; and
( ii ) There is reason to believe that— ( A ) The subject of the investigation or proceeding is not aware of its pendency; and
( B ) Disclosure of the existence of the records could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings.
( 5 ) Informant records maintained by any criminal law enforcement component of DOT under an informant's name or personal identifier, if requested by a third party according to the informant's name or personal identifier, unless the informant's status as an informant has been officially confirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
CT Communications, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (Registration Nos. 33- 59641, 33-59643, 33-59645, 333-15537, 333-30125, and
333-38895) of CT Communications, Inc. of our report dated March 5, 1999,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of CT Communications, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, and related schedule,
which report is included in the December 31, 1998 Annual Report on Form 10-K of
CT Communications, Inc.


                                            /s/ KPMG LLP
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            KPMG LLP

Charlotte, North Carolina
May 28, 1999