alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Anita N. Wiener, Plaintiff, v. J. Allen Wiener, sometimes known as Jack Wiener, Defendant.

*(October*25, 1951.)

Carey and Layton, J. J., sitting.

*Clair J. Killoran*for Plaintiff.

*Joseph H. Flanzer*for Defendant.

Superior Court for New Castle County,

No. 535,

Civil Action, 1951.

*344Layton, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

Prior to the adoption of the new *Rules of the Superior Court,*it was the practice that where the defense to a divorce action was to consist of no more than a general denial of the allegations of the petition, no answer need be filed. Otherwise, a formal answer was required. 2 *Wooley, Delaware Practice, Sec.*1636; *Banks v. Banks,*6 *Penn.*442, 67 *A.*835; *Bancroft v. Bancroft,*4 *Boyce*9, 85 *A.*561; *Palese v. Palese, 6 Boyce*584, 101 *A.*438. In our opinion, Rule; 104 has changed this practice and requires the filing of an answer in every case where defendant desires to defend and this is so whether the defense consists of a general denial or contains matter sounding in confession and avoidance, or both.

However, in view of the fact that this is the first interpretation of Rule 104 by this court, we think that defendant should be permitted to file an answer and be let into trial subject, nevertheless, to plaintiff’s right to move for a continuance should the answer raise a defense or defenses which he may be unprepared to meet. This ruling is clearly within the court’s discretionary power. Rule 6(b).
1210-AB32-2-1468.html[7/26/2015 5:31:25 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwg-idee

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1964

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Although the exact and full intent of these regulations is somewhat unclear to me, if they in any way serve to

 restrict freedom of the owners' use of their retirement funds, I can't voice my opposition strongly enough. After

 the government's disastrous "handling" of the Social Security fund which is set to run out in a few more years, to

 suggest that this same government knows better that the American citizens how to manage the use of our own

 retirement funds (which by the way would never hold up to a court challenge), is indeed laughable, and yet

 tragic for those that would be affected.

 Again, to summarize, if these regulations in any way serve to restrict the owners' use of their own retirement

 funds, I am strongly opposed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 23, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 57479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18088]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to The National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Subcutaneous Drug Development & Delivery 
Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on June 23, 2023, pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Subcutaneous Drug Development & 
Delivery Consortium, Inc. (``Subcutaneous Drug Development & Delivery 
Consortium, Inc.'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, has 
been added as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Subcutaneous Drug Development & 
Delivery Consortium, Inc. intends to file additional written 
notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On October 26, 2020, Subcutaneous Drug Development & Delivery 
Consortium, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to section 
6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the 
Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on December 3, 
2020 (85 FR 78148).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on December 21, 
2022. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on January 25, 2023 (88 FR 4850).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-18088 Filed 8-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Brian L. Roberts, certify that:

Date:
March 25, 2005

/s/
BRIAN L. ROBERTS

---

Name: Brian L. Roberts
Chief Executive Officer

---



I, Lawrence S. Smith, certify that:

Date:
March 25, 2005

/s/
LAWRENCE S. SMITH

---

Name: Lawrence S. Smith
Co-Chief Financial Officer

---



I, John R. Alchin, certify that:

Date:
March 25, 2005

|/s/JOHN R. ALCHINName: John R. Alchin
Co-Chief Financial Officer
|----------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 439 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 12, 2002.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 96) proposing a tax 
limitation amendment to the Constitution of the United States. The joint 
resolution shall be considered as read for amendment. The previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution and any amendment thereto 
to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) two hours of debate 
equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on the Judiciary; (2) an amendment in the nature of a substitute 
printed in the Congressional Record pursuant to clause 8 of rule XVIII, if 
offered by the Minority Leader or his designee, which shall be considered as 
read and shall be separately debatable for one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with 
or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
U.S. military deaths in Pakistan
 By None  , U.S. Central Command
  `ISLAMABAD (Feb. 3, 2010) – Three U.S. military members died of wounds suffered from an improvised explosive device today in the Lower Dir District of Pakistan’s Northwest Frontier Province, and two U.S. service members were wounded.     The service members were assigned to the Office of the Defense Representative, Pakistan to conduct civil affairs-related training at the invitation of the Government of Pakistan.  They were in Lower Dir to attend an inauguration ceremony at a girls school that had recently been renovated with U.S. humanitarian assistance money.    “This attack demonstrates the terrorists’ lack of respect for life, and their willingness to use violence against women and children as a means for advancing their malign vision,” said Rear Adm. Hal Pittman, Director of Communication at U.S. Central Command.  “The U.S. personnel were in Pakistan at the request of the Government of Pakistan to assist the Pakistanis with training in support of our long-standing partnership with Pakistan, and this horrific attack will not dissuade that partnership.  We extend our sincere condolences to the families and loved ones of those innocent individuals who were killed or injured.”      The names of the deceased are being withheld pending notification of next of kin and release by the Department of Defense.  The names of the service members are announced through the U.S. Department of Defense Official Website at http://www.defense.gov.  The announcements are made on the Website no earlier than 24 hours after notification of the service members’ primary next of kin.     The wounded service members were evacuated for treatment.`
§ 581.6 Conditions. The vehicle shall meet the requirements of § 581.5 under the following conditions. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) The vehicle is at unloaded vehicle weight.
( 2 ) The front wheels are in the straight ahead position.
( 3 ) Tires are inflated to the vehicle manufacturer's recommended pressure for the specified loading condition.
( 4 ) Brakes are disengaged and the transmission is in neutral.
( 5 ) Trailer hitches, license plate brackets, and headlamp washers are removed from the vehicle. Running lights, fog lamps, and equipment mounted on the bumper face bar are removed from the vehicle if they are optional equipment.
( b ) *Pendulum test conditions.* The following conditions apply to the pendulum test procedures of § 581.7 (a) and (b). ( 1 ) The test device consists of a block with one side contoured as specified in Figure 1 and Figure 2 with the impact ridge made of A1S1 4130 steel hardened to 34 Rockwell “C.” The impact ridge and the surfaces in Planes A and B of the test device are finished with a surface roughness of 32 as specified by SAE Recommended Practice J449A, June 1963. From the point of release of the device until the onset of rebound, the pendulum suspension system holds Plane A vertical, with the arc described by any point on the impact line lying in a vertical plane (for § 581.7(a), longitudinal; for § 581.7(b), at an angle of 30° to a vertical longitudinal plane) and having a constant radius of not less than 11 feet.
( 2 ) With Plane A vertical, the impact line shown in Figures 1 and 2 is horizontal at the same height as the test device's center of percussion.
( 3 ) The effective impacting mass of the test device is equal to the mass of the tested vehicle.
( 4 ) When impacted by the test device, the vehicle is at rest on a level rigid concrete surface.
( c ) *Barrier test condition.* At the onset of a barrier impact, the vehicle's engine is operating at idling speed in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. Vehicle systems that are not necessary to the movement of the vehicle are not operating during impact.
(Authority: Sec. 102, Pub. L. 92-513, 86 Stat. 947 (15 U.S.C. 1912); secs. 103, 119, Pub. L. 89-563, 80 Stat. 718 (15 U.S.C. 1392, 1407); delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.7)
[42 FR 24059, May 12, 1977, as amended at 42 FR 38909, Aug. 1, 1977; 48 FR 43331, Sept. 23, 1983]
**EXHIBIT
      23.3**  **CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
   We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
        333-64215 on Form S-3 of our report dated February 28, 2007 (which expresses
        an
        unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to PNM
        Resources, Inc.’s acquisition of TNP Enterprises, Inc in 2005 and the adoption
        of Financial Accounting Standards Board Financial Interpretation No. 47, *Accounting
        for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations* in 2005
        and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), *Share-Based
        Payment* and
        Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, *Employers'
        Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an
        amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132R* in
        2006), relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
        schedule of Texas-New Mexico Power Company appearing in this Annual Report
        on
        Form 10-K of Texas-New Mexico Power Company for the year ended December 31,
        2006.
   
 /S/
        DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
  Dallas,
        Texas
 February
        28, 2007
KELLO 1 : name is : : r; . ck:rrr :. ., I have b... , resident ,f the

District of Columbia for almost 30 y ears.. ,: I want to thank the E P A for holding these hearings r hear first hand how carbonpollution effected the citizens of this country.

Breathing this polluted air nowo over 30 years, re • rrer a slight case of asthma. Here is my asthma . D . R inhaler which I have r e participate in any athletic or strenuous , fish out r; breathing is strained r I get tired quicker.

President Obama saying he is concerned about what r rf environment he is going toe. r daughters. I have my first grandchild comhag Ois December, and : worry about r t kind of air he ; o ; ; g to

r

r I would like to suggest : two o r, a r have personal experienceboth. First, we cang decrease coal 1 ' burning for energy f•

1: t 1. g. s 1 funding Solar Energy.

liopefully the EPA will continue i f' 1 t g; ng ignorant prorit motivated interests, and educate all Americans about the seriousness 1 e situation we are NOW 1; 1

. a g
Links for LPS20298.

https://web.archive.org/web/20120922073122/http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofa/data-reports/index.htm
Exhibit 32-2



Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code



The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Report on Form 10-K/A of Exelon Corporation for the year ended December 31,
2008, that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Exelon Corporation.



|                        |  |                                                                       
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 18, 2009 |  | /s/    MATTHEW F.
HILZINGER                                           
|                        |  | Matthew F. Hilzinger Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



68
From: Jeremy Rettich [mailto:jrettich@virtueadvisors.com] 

Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2015 9:58 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: DOL Fiduciary Rule

I do not believe that the current DOL Fiduciary Rule will benefit many Americans including the middle

class.

Thanks,

Jeremy Rettich

President 

Virtue Advisors, LLC

Investment Advisor Representative of VCM

 

 

22 Century Blvd // Suite 450 // Nashville, TN // 37214

Toll Free 866.907.4275 // Main 615.340.0801

Fax 855.884.2689

The information in this e-mail transmission may be confidential or legally privileged information. If you have received this email in error, please delete immediately and e-mail the sender. Please be advised that any distribution, reading, copying or 

other use of this e-mail communication by anyone other than the designated recipient is strictly prohibited.

IRS Circular 230 Disclaimer: To ensure compliance with IRS Circular 230, any U.S. Federal Tax Advice Provided in this 

communication is not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used by the recipient or any other taxpayer (I) for the 

purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the recipient or any other taxpayer, or (II) in promoting, marketing or 

recommending to another party, a partnership or other entity, investment plan, arrangement or other transaction addressed 

herein.

Investment Advisory services offered through Virtue Capital Management, LLC (VCM); a SEC Registered Investment Advisor. 

Virtue Financial Advisors, LLC and VCM are independent of one another. TN Insurance license number 897892.
— REG-14 8687-09 Page 1 of 1

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION
PRCA: & & BECULATIONS MAR 1 2 2010

As of: March 12, 2010
Received: March 12, 2010
Status: Poste
PUBLIC SUBMISSION (reset sec 'stahcose
iComments Due: May 03, 2010
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0006
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants & Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Comment On: IRS-2010-0006-0001
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Document: IRS-2010-0006-0053
Comment on FR Doc # N/A

Submitter Information

Name: Don Tibbitts
Address:
5615 S. 89th E. Ave
Tulsa, OK, 74145
Email: dontibbitts@cox.net

Submitter's Representative: John Sullivan

General Comment

Iam adamantly opposed to any regulation or proposed regulation which will convert 401k and
IRA savings into annuities or other sources of income streams. The government has absolutely no
business managing privately held retirement assets; this is just a ploy to steal peoples' money in
order to finance the unconscionable nationa debt. This is OUR MONEY, not the governments! The
Federal government needs to subsist on what it takes in on current taxes and not continue to
fleece the populace to finance the out of control spending.

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 3/12/2010
EXHIBIT 23

Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

As  independent   certified  public  accountants,   we  hereby  consent  to  the
incorporation  by reference of our reports  included in this Form 10-K, into the
Company's  previously filed  Registration  Statements on Forms S-3 (Registration
Statement File Nos. 33-70326 and 33-49176),  Form S-4/A (Registration  Statement
File No.  333-36375) and Forms S-8 (Registration  Statement File Nos.  33-42516,
33-63501, 33-63503, 33-63499,  333-03937,  333-08475,  333-45691,  333-58771 and
333-8225).



ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Fort Lauderdale, Florida,
    March 10, 2000.
Exhibit
10.2


FIRST
AMENDMENT TO THE


PNM
RESOURCES, INC.


LONG-TERM
PERFORMANCE CASH PROGRAM




Effective
January 1, 2004, PNM Resources, Inc. established the PNM Resources, Inc.
Long-Term Performance Cash Program (the “Plan”).  The purpose of this
First Amendment is to satisfy the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”).  Section 409A of the Code became
applicable to the Plan as of January 1, 2005.  The Plan has been
and shall continue to be administered in good faith compliance with the
requirements of Section 409A from January 1, 2005 through December 31,
2008.


1.           Except
as noted below, this First Amendment shall be effective as of January 1,
2009.


2.           The
Section of the Plan entitled “Award Payouts” is hereby amended and restated in
its entirety to read as follows:




·  Award
Payouts




After the
end of each Performance Period, the Committee will calculate the Company’s TSR
performance and will approve Awards, if applicable.  The payment,
generally, will be made by March 15 following the end of the applicable
Performance Period.  If it is administratively impracticable to make
the payment by March 15, the payment will be made as soon as reasonably
practical following March 15.  The payments also may be delayed
in accordance with regulations issued pursuant to Section 409A of the Internal
Revenue Code.  Awards will be issued to Participants in the form of
cash.




3.           This
First Amendment amends only the provisions of the Plan as noted below, and those
provisions not expressly amended shall be considered in full force and
effect.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, this First Amendment shall
supersede the provisions of the Plan to the extent those provisions are
inconsistent with the provisions and intent of this First
Amendment.







IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to be executed as
of this 8th day
of December,
2008.


PNM
RESOURCES, INC.






By:   /s/ Alice A. Cobb


Its: SVP, Chief
Administrative Officer


2
Docket: EBSA-2010-0007 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in 

Retirement Plans 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0007-0001 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options 

Document: EBSA-2010-0007-DRAFT-0007 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: Ben Smith 

Address: 

Cocoa Beach, FL, 

Organization: Citizen 

General Comment 

Please do not steal my IRA or 401K. Annuitizing this money is stealing. 

Bad idea 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: February 17, 2010 

Received: February 03, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80a8ceed 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 2/17/2010
#### John D. Christie, *Respondent, v.*Charles W. Oldfield, *Appellant.*

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
Exhibit 99.09

          Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
            pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Spectrum Organic
Products, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Neil G. Blomquist, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2)   the information contained in the Report presents fairly, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                             /s/  Neil G. Blomquist
                                             -------------------------
                                                  Neil G. Blomquist
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                                  May 9, 2003