alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
June 26: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL Terrorists in Syria and Iraq
 By CJTF - Operation Inherent Resolve News Release
  June 26, 2015 Release # 20150626 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **SOUTHWEST ASIA –**
 Coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria 
and Iraq June 25. In Syria, coalition military forces conducted 14 
airstrikes using bomber, fighter and remotely piloted aircraft. 
Separately in Iraq, coalition military forces conducted 14 airstrikes 
approved by the Iraqi Ministry of Defense using attack, bomber and 
fighter aircraft against ISIL terrorists. “The coalition struck 
multiple Daesh terrorist targets in northern Syria,” said Col. Wayne 
Marotto, CJTF-OIR chief of public affairs. “Many of these strikes were 
in response to Daesh attacks against anti-ISIL forces, who repelled all 
attempts by the terrorists to take ground.” The following is a summary of the strikes conducted since the last press release: **Syria** * Near Ar Raqqah, one airstrike struck an ISIL excavator. * Near Dayr Az Zawr, one airstrike destroyed two ISIL fighting positions. *
 Near Kobani, 10 airstrikes struck two large and six small ISIL tactical
 units, destroying six ISIL vehicles, three ISIL fighting positions, two
 ISIL mortar firing positions and two ISIL staging areas. * Near Tal Abyad, two airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit, destroying two ISIL fighting positions. **Iraq** *
 Near Baghdadi, two airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and two ISIL
 vehicles, destroying an ISIL fighting position and an ISIL heavy 
machine gun. * Near Al Huwayjah, one airstrike struck an ISIL mortar firing position. * Near Al Qaim, one airstrike had inconclusive results. * Near Bayji, one airstrike struck land features denying ISIL a tactical advantage. *
 Near Fallujah, one airstrike struck an ISIL large tactical unit, 
destroying two ISIL heavy machine guns, an ISIL structure, an ISIL 
staging area and an ISIL vehicle. * Near Kirkuk, one airstrike destroyed three ISIL fighting positions. * Near Makhmur, one airstrike struck an ISIL mortar firing position. * Near Mosul, three airstrikes struck an ISIL checkpoint, an ISIL staging area and an ISIL mortar firing position. * Near Sinjar, one airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and an ISIL mortar firing position. * Near Tal Afar, two airstrikes struck an ISIL fighting position and an ISIL mortar firing position. Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely. The
 strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the 
operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose
 to Iraq, Syria, the region and the wider international community. The 
destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the 
terrorist group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. 
Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Iraq include 
Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, Netherlands, United
 Kingdom and United States. Coalition nations which have conducted 
airstrikes in Syria include Bahrain, Canada, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, 
United Arab Emirates and the U.S.
From: Mike Erle [mailto:Mike.Erle@victaulic.com] 

Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 10:32 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Yes, I would like to have my investment advisor be required to act in a fiduciary capacity with 

my retirement and investment funds entrusted to him. At the very least, provide me with a 

document that shows one box or the other being checked – Broker / Dealer or Fiduciary.

Thanks and regards, Mike 

Michael Erle

3857 Washington St

Schnecksville, PA 18078

mikeerle@gmail.com
# ASAB Steps Up Tactical Airlift Abilities with Upgraded C-130 Model

/ Published Nov. 5, 2021
ALI AL SALEM AIR BASE, Kuwait, 
The 779th Expeditionary Airlift Squadron was redesignated as the 61st EAS this week, ushering in the C-130J Super Hercules to replace the legacy H models that have operated at Ali Al Salem Air Base.

The arrival of the C-130J, the latest addition to the C-130 fleet, will promote flexibility from its ability to perform more than one role in the tactical portion of airlift missions. The J model includes advances in technology that reduce manpower requirements, current operating and support costs, and provides future cost savings when upgrades become available.

“The Airmen of the 61st EAS spent the past 4 months preparing for this deployment and I know they are ready to take on the responsibility of being the primary source for Air Force Central Command’s tactical airlift in the area of responsibility.” said U.S. Air Force Lt. Col. Nicholas Redenius, 61st EAS commander. “We are committed to continuing the 386th Air Expeditionary Wing’s legacy as the premier Tactical Airlift Wing while executing missions in support of Operation Inherent Resolve.”

The long-standing legacy of tactical airlift transitioning from the H to the J model brings more capabilities and capacity to the AOR.

“The J flies faster, requires two fewer aircrew personnel, has two more pallet positions, and comes with upgraded avionics,” Redenius said. “These improvements provide our supported forces additional flexibility and capability when requesting cargo movement.”

The C-130 is able to land and operate in the most austere, bare-bones environment, bringing with it a wide array of equipment from helicopters, armored vehicles, standard palletized cargo and service members.

Currently the 779th EAS is comprised of the 908th Airlift Wing from Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama, as the Reserve component and the 166th Airlift Wing from Wilmington, Delaware, as the Air National Guard component.

U.S. Air Force Maj. Bryan Powell, 779th Expeditionary Airlift Squadron assistant director of operations, said that many members of the 779th EAS have years of experience within the U.S. Central Command Area of Responsibility, as the C-130H has operated in this theater for the past 20 years.

“While the 166th AW is continuing its C-130 operations, the 908th AW will be transitioning away from the tactical airlift world and re-missioning in April of next year,” said Powell. “As such, this is the last C-130 deployment for the 908th AW, and for many of our members, the last C-130 deployment they will ever do.”

Powell said the 908th AW has completed deployments since 1983. So, this being a possible last deployment moves many members.

“To be involved in the final deployment of the unit leaves me both incredibly proud and also incredibly sad,” Powell stated. “As you can see, the redesignation of the 779th carries with it several significant moments in our time.”
§ 831.30 Authority of NTSB in highway investigations. ( a ) *Scope.* The NTSB is responsible for the investigation of selected highway accidents (e.g., collisions, crashes and explosions), including at railroad grade-crossing accidents. Such investigations will be conducted in cooperation with the designated authorities of the state or local jurisdiction in which the accident occurred.
( b ) *Authority to examine or test.* Pursuant to § 831.9 of this part, a credentialed employee of the NTSB is authorized to examine or test any item, including any vehicle, part of a vehicle, equipment, or contents of any vehicle or equipment involved in an accident subject to the NTSB's authority. Examination or testing will be conducted— ( 1 ) To the extent practicable, so as to not interfere with or obstruct the transportation services provided by the owner or operator of a vehicle or equipment; and
( 2 ) In a manner that preserves evidence relating to the transportation accident, in cooperation with the owner or operator of the vehicle or equipment, and consistent with the needs of the investigation.
( c ) Any Federal, state, or local agency that conducts an investigation of the same highway accident the NTSB is investigating shall provide the results of its investigation to the NTSB.
<Page>

EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Computer
Horizons Corp. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Annual
Report"), I, William J. Murphy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that
the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 28, 2003                                /s/  William J. Murphy
                                                     ----------------------
                                                     WILLIAM J. MURPHY
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
ORDER

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0471

BRENDA ZASTOUPIL,

Petitioner and Appellant. 

vs.

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY,

UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE APPEALS BOARD,

Respondent and Appellee.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Upon consideration of Appellee’s Motion for Extension of Time to file its

response brief, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Appellee is granted an extension of 

time to and including February 14, 2024, to file the Appellee’s Response Brief.

DATED this ___ day of ______________________, 2023.

____________________________________

DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

cc: Brenda Zastoupil

Aleea Sharp

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

December 27 2023

12/27/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0471
#### § 821.38 Evidence.

In any proceeding under the rules in this part, all evidence which is relevant, material, reliable and probative, and not unduly repetitious or cumulative, shall be admissible. All other evidence shall be excluded. The Federal Rules of Evidence will be applied in these proceedings to the extent practicable.

[78 FR 57534, Sept. 19, 2013]
#### Jones *v.*Carrigan, Appellant.

*Affidavit of defense*— Sale—Delivery.

In an action to recover the price of ninety tons of salt alleged to have been sold and delivered, an affidavit of defense is sufficient to prevent a summary judgment for the whole claim, which distinctly and specifically denies the delivery of ninety tons of salt although admitting the delivery and acceptance of eighty-five tons.

Argued Dec. 15, 1914.

Appeal, No. 269, Oct. T., 1914, by defendant, from order of C. P., No. 3, Phila. Co., June T., 1914, No. 2,953, making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of William H. Jones, Trustee, v. Thomas J. Carrigan, trading as The Somer Salt Company.

Before Rice, P. J., Orlady, Head, Kephart and Trexler, JJ.

Reversed.

Assumpsit for goods sold and delivered.

Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.

The opinion of the Superior Court states the case.

*Error assigned*was order making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.

*B. H. Locke,*for appellant.

*Edward P. Kirby,*for appellee, filed no printed brief,

*313February 24, 1915:

Opinion by

Orlady, J.,

The plaintiff brought suit to recover a balance alleged to he due on three shipments of salt, as specified in an exhibit attached to his statement. On a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense the court entered a judgment for the amount claimed to be due. In the original and supplemental affidavit of defense, which are to be taken together, there was a distinct and specific denial of the delivery of the ninety tons of salt, and an admission of delivery and acceptance of eighty-five tons only. The other averment may be considered as not conclusive, but as to this one we have the fact of shortage of weight so specificially averred as to not warrant the court in entering a summary judgment for the whole claim, and to this extent the judgment should be reversed. A later rule was entered for judgment for the amount as to which the affidavit is insufficient, and this, from the record, does not appear to have been disposed of. As this appeal is presented we consider only the general rule, and on authority of Armstrong v. Descalzi, 48 Pa. Superior Ct. 171, and authorities therein cited; and Noble v. Erwin, 50 Pa. Superior Ct. 72.

The judgment is reversed, with a procedendo.
**Exhibit 24.4**

 

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

 

KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, Bruce DeMars do hereby appoint John W. Rowe and Randall E. Mehrberg, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name andon my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2006 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform allthings necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present. 

 

 

DATE: February 5, 2007
H. Res. 444

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 18, 2002.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill (H.R.

327) to amend chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code,

for the purpose of facilitating compliance by small businesses

with certain Federal paperwork requirements and to establish

a task force to examine the feasibility of streamlining paperwork requirements applicable to small businesses, with Senate

amendments thereto, and to consider in the House, without

intervention of any point of order, a single motion offered by

the chairman of the Committee on Government Reform or his

designee that the House concur in the Senate amendments.

The Senate amendments and the motion shall be considered

as read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour equally

divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on Government Reform. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the motion
2

•HRES 444 EH

to final adoption without intervening motion or demand for

division of the question.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 388 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 17, 2002.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill 
(H.R. 476) to amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit taking minors 
across State lines in circumvention of laws requiring the involvement of parents 
in abortion decisions. The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage 
without intervening motion except: (1) two hours of debate on the bill equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on the Judiciary; and (2) one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
CENTCOM investigation of Wanat combat action completed; report forwarded to Army
 By None  , U.S. Central Command
  MACDILL AFB, Fla. (Jan. 29, 2010) – The investigation into the combat action that occurred at Wanat, Afghanistan on 13 July 2008, ordered by Gen. David Petraeus, Commander, U.S. Central Command, and led by Lt. General R. F. Natonski, has been completed.The report has been thoroughly reviewed and endorsed by Gen. Petraeus and forwarded to the Department of the Army as a matter under its cognizance.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0690.html[7/21/2015 8:34:33 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-gnqh

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0690

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Daphne Adams

General Comment

Please leave my 401K alone and the money I have earned by working and trying to make more just just like the

 rest of the government employees are trying to do. I am a poor American working person with a very little

 investment and you are or so selfish to deny some of the American working population the opportunity to better

 themselves. Please leave us alone NOW.!!
#### § 1.205 Applicability to Federal financial assistance.

The types of instruments that are subject to the guidance in this subtitle vary from one portion of the guidance to another. All portions of the guidance apply to grants and cooperative agreements, and some portions also apply to other types of Federal financial assistance.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-08-252-CV

GREG LYNN CAREY								APPELLANT 	

	V.

 TONY DAUPHINOT	APPELLEE

	----------

	FROM THE 325TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered “Respondent Greg Carey’s Notice Of Dismissal Of Appeal.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

	Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:  WALKER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.

DELIVERED:  July 10, 2008
Exhibit 4.3(B)



 Exhibit 4.3(B) 
  
 TRUST AGREEMENT, dated as of
                        , 20    , between JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as
depositor (the “Depositor”) and                     , a
                    , not in its individual capacity but solely as owner trustee (the “Owner Trustee”). The Depositor and the Owner
Trustee hereby agree as follows: 
  
 1. The trust created hereby
shall be known as “Chase Auto Owner Trust 20    -    ”, in which name the Owner Trustee may engage in the transactions contemplated hereby, make and execute contracts, and sue and be
sued. 
  
 2. The Depositor hereby assigns, transfers, conveys and
sets over to the Owner Trustee the sum of $1. The Owner Trustee hereby acknowledges receipt of such amount in trust from the Depositor, which amount shall constitute the initial trust estate. The Owner Trustee hereby declares that it will hold the
trust estate in trust for the Depositor. It is the intention of the parties hereto that the Trust created hereby constitute a statutory trust under Chapter 38 of Title 12 of the Delaware Code, 12 Del. C. §3801 et seq., and that
this document constitutes the governing instrument of the Trust. The Owner Trustee is hereby authorized and directed to execute and file a certificate of trust with the Delaware Secretary of State in the form attached hereto. 
  
 3. The Depositor and the Owner Trustee will enter into an amended and
restated Trust Agreement, satisfactory to each such party, to provide for the contemplated operation of the Trust created hereby. Prior to the execution and delivery of such amended and restated Trust Agreement, the Owner Trustee shall not have any
duty or obligation hereunder or with respect to the trust estate, except upon the written direction of the Depositor to take such action as determined by the Depositor to be necessary to obtain prior to such execution and delivery any licenses,
consents or approvals required by applicable law or otherwise. 
  
 4. This Trust Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts. 
  
 5. The Owner Trustee may resign upon thirty days prior notice to the Depositor. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Trust Agreement to be duly executed by their
respective officers hereunto duly authorized, as of the day and year first above written. 
  

			
	JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, as Depositor
		
	By:	 	  


	Name:	 	 
	Title:	 	 
	
	                            , as
Owner Trustee
		
	By:	 	  


	Name:	 	 
	Title:
H. Res. 414

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 8, 2002.

Resolved, That the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 84) disapproving the action taken by the President under section

203 of the Trade Act of 1974 transmitted to the Congress

on March 5, 2002, is hereby laid on the table.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### Peter W. Dafoe, Respondent, v. Marvin L. Hess, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed. Opinion by

Corlett, J.
Service Annual Survey - Survey Repository


The PDF versions of the surveys for the Service Annual Survey are available below, based on identified sectors or NAICS classification.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

CHRISTOPHER CAMPBELL,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Appellee.

§

§ No. 151, 2023

§

§ Court Below–Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware 

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 2109013696 (S)

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

Submitted: June 27, 2023

Decided: July 7, 2023

ORDER

On June 6, 2023, the Senior Court Clerk issued a notice, sent by certified mail, 

directing the appellant, Christopher Campbell, to show cause why his appeal should 

not be dismissed for his failure to pay the Supreme Court filing fee or file a motion 

to proceed in forma pauperis. Campbell received the notice, as evidenced by the 

return receipt that was filed with the Court on June 15, 2023. A timely response to 

the notice to show cause was due on or before June 26, 2023. To date, Campbell 

has not paid the Supreme Court filing fee, filed a motion to proceed in forma 

pauperis, or responded to the notice to show cause. Dismissal of this action is 

therefore deemed to be unopposed.
2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme Court 

Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b), that the appeal be DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice