alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Docket: EBSA-2010-0014 

Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status as a 

Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0014-0001 

Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status as a 

Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: EBSA-2010-0014-DRAFT-0002 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: Willa Dean Watkins 

Address: 

650 N. Church Avenue 

Louisville, MS, 39339 

Email: deanwatkins@taylorbigred.com 

Phone: 662-779-5433 

Organization: The Taylor Group, Inc. 

General Comment 

Employers should be allowed to change insurance providers as long as the coverage remains the 

same. To disallow this is to disallow competition in the marketplace. Some insurance providers 

have different PPO providers and employers look for companies whose providers are the ones 

used most by their employees. Some insurance companies will give better premium rates than 

others. I belive it would be unconstitutional to tell a company or business that you must continue 

to do business with the same carrier or lose your right to keep the coverage you have now. 

Keeping the coverage we now have does not mean that we can't keep it with a different carrier. 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION 

As of: July 21, 2010 

Received: June 21, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80b071b8 

Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 7/21/2010
# Coalition forces capture Special Groups leader, 12 detained

/ Published Dec. 18, 2007

Iraqi Army Division Soldiers, advised by U.S. Special Forces, captured a known arms dealer in an operation in the Kirkuk province Dec. 17 and a known terrorist cell leader Dec. 14 in Ba’ajah.

Iraqi Soldiers, advised by U.S. Special Forces, captured the arms dealer in an overnight operation in the Kirkuk province. The dealer supplied weapons for use against Iraqi and Coalition Forces to al-Qaeda in Iraq networks and other terrorist groups.

In another operation Dec. 14, Iraqi Soldiers, advised by U.S.Special Forces, captured a known terrorist cell leader in the village of Ba’ajah.The terrorist is believed to have planned and conducted numerous attacks against Iraqi and Coalition Forces, including explosively formed penetrator and small arms fire attacks.

Additionally, the terrorist is thought to have ties to foreign terrorist networks and large sums of money to finance additional attacks. There were no Iraqi or U.S. Forces injured during either operation.
###### Editorial Note on Part 576

#### Editorial Note:

For an interpretation document regarding part 576, see 40 FR 3296, Jan. 21, 1975.

#### § 576.3 Application.

This part applies to all manufacturers of motor vehicles, with respect to all records generated or acquired on or after August 16, 1969, and to all manufacturers of motor vehicle equipment, with respect to all records in their possession, generated or acquired on or after August 9, 2002.

[67 FR 45873, July 10, 2002]
THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION ONE

JOHN HOAG and DELLA HOAG,

husband and wife, and their marital

community,

Petitioners,

v.

No. 73792-9-

DIVISION ONE

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

C~>.

1

r-1,

CAR WASH ENTERPRISES, INC.,

a Washington corporation or other

business entity; and GARY KNIGHT

and "PAT DOE" KNIGHT, and their

marital community,

Respondents.

ro

FILED: October 5, 2015

PER CURIAM - John and Delia Hoag seek discretionary review under RAP

2.3(b)(1) of a July 7, 2015 trial court order denying their affidavit of prejudice and a July

15, 2015 order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the motion and answer,

with appendices, and determined that review should be granted.

The trial court denied the Hoag's affidavit of prejudice on the ground that the

court had made a discretionary ruling. But the order amending case schedule was

before the court on a stipulation between the parties. See In re Marriage of Tve, 121

Wn. App. 817, 90 P.3d 1145 (2004), and State v. Parra. 122 Wn.2d 590, 859 P.2d 1231

(1993) (citing State ex rel. Floe v. Studebaker, 17 Wn.2d 8, 134 P.2d 718 (1943).

Because the Hoags filed their affidavit of prejudice before the trial court made any
No. 73792-9-1/2

discretionary ruling, it was error to deny the affidavit of prejudice. Accordingly, the stay

is lifted, and we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this order.

Reversed and remanded.

For the court:

y—t¥-—

T

TV; M c y /

l£=2- •^J
# Hispanic Fathers and Family Literacy:

##   Strengthening Achievement in Hispanic Communities

#### 
  A report on a dialogue with community providers of services for Hispanic  fathers, national Hispanic organizations, literacy programs, and advocates  for fatherhood held on January 13, 2000
U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesHispanic Association of Colleges and Universities National Practitioners Network for Fathers and Families
December 2000
*This report was prepared by:*
Vanessa Bernal Lisa A. Gilmore Linda Mellgren Jackie Melandez Carmen Seleme-McDermott Laura Vazquez
This report was prepared by the Hispanic Association of Colleges and	Universities for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office	of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, under a cooperative	agreement with the Office of Minority Health, DHHS. Additional support for	the project was provided by the National Practitioners Network for Fathers	and Families through a grant from the Annie E. Casey Foundation. The views	expressed in this report are those of the meeting participants and the report	authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Health	and Human Services, the Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities,	or the National Practitioners Network for Fathers and Families. Information	on nonfederal agencies and resources are provided for the readers convenience	and do not imply any endorsement by HHS, HACU or NPNFF.
*This report is available on the Internet:*http://fatherhood.hhs.gov/hispanic01/index.htmContents
Purpose of this Report 
Educational Achievement: A Key Concern for HispanicCommunities by Carmen Seleme-McDermott
Programs for Hispanic Fathers: Perspective fromResearch by Laura Vazquez
Learning From our Partners: A Summary of theDialogue by Lisa A. Gilmore, Linda Mellgren, and Laura Vazquez
Continuing the Dialogue
Dialogue Participants-  Program Partners  Federal Partners
Resource Directory for Serving Hispanic Fathers andFamilies
Preface-  Acknowledgments   Appendices (links to documents not on this site):-  The Hispanic Population in the United States  (Census    Report)   Involving Hispanic Parents (ERIC Digests)  The Importance of Fathers in Educational Achievement
    (NCES Briefs)
  Where to?
Top of PageContents
**Home Pages:**HHS Fatherhood InitiativeAssistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation(ASPE)U.S. Department of Health and Human Services(HHS)
Last updated: 04/27/01
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-10679

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ABISAI RAMIREZ-ANGUIANO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:18-CR-21-1

Before DAVIS, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Abisai Ramirez-Anguiano was convicted of one count of possession of 

methamphetamine with intent to distribute and sentenced to serve 240 

months in prison and a three-year term of supervised release. On appeal, he 

challenges only the district court’s application of the two-level enhancement 

pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(5) for importation of methamphetamine, 

arguing that the district court erred by applying this enhancement because 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 21, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-10679 Document: 00514883091 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/21/2019
No. 18-10679

2

there was no evidence to show that he knew the methamphetamine was 

imported. The Government has moved for summary affirmance or, 

alternatively, an extension of time to file a brief.

As Ramirez-Anguiano acknowledges, his argument is foreclosed by 

United States v. Serfass, 684 F.3d 548, 552 (5th Cir. 2012), which held that the 

§ 2D1.1(b)(5) enhancement applies “regardless of whether the defendant had 

knowledge of that importation.” Accordingly, the Government’s motion for 

summary affirmance is GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for 

an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district 

court is AFFIRMED. 

 Case: 18-10679 Document: 00514883091 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/21/2019
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0800.html[7/21/2015 1:05:17 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-yleo

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0800

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Andy Ramsey

General Comment

I can plan my own retirement just fine. We don't need any more regulation.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.14 MB)
 
 The 380th Air Expeditionary Wing’s newest weapon system the E-3G Sentry airborne warning and control system aircraft completed its first active combat mission from an undisclosed location in Southwest Asia Nov. 21 2015.
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### § 1.220 Federal agency implementation of this subtitle.

A Federal agency that awards Federal financial assistance subject to the OMB guidance in this subtitle implements the guidance in agency regulations in subtitle B of this title and in guidance documents, policy documents, and procedural issuances, such as internal instructions to the agency's awarding and administering officials. An applicant, recipient, or subrecipient would see the effect of that implementation in the organization and content of the agency's announcements of funding opportunities and in its award terms and conditions.
EXHIBIT 11.1 - COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                  For the Three Months Ended December 31, 1997
                      Advanced Communication Systems, Inc.
                      (in thousands, except per share data)

   Basic:                
    Total basic weighted average shares outstanding...........    6,352
                                                              ============

    Net income................................................     $654
                                                              ============

    Net income per share - basic..............................    $0.10
                                                              ============

   Diluted:                
    Total basic weighted average shares outstanding...........    6,352
    Plus dilutive stock options...............................      128
                                                              ------------
    Total diluted average shares..............................    6,480
                                                              ============

    Net income per share - diluted............................    $0.10
                                                              ============
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- Government Services Corp. Under Contract No. SP0600-12-D-4552 APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 60392
Gregory R. Rauch, Esq.

Magyar, Rauch & Associates PLLC Moscow, ID Daniel K. Poling, Esq.

DLA ChiefTrial Attorney Jared M. Miller, Esq. Kathryn M. Kelley, Esq.

Trial Attorneys DLA Energy Fort Belvoir, VA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 4 October 20 I7

DAYID D'ALESSANDRIS Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60392, Appeal ofGovernment Services Corp., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
H. Res. 316

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

December 13, 2001.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (S. 1438) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year

2002 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for

military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe personnel strengths for such

fiscal year for the Armed Forces, and for other purposes. All

points of order against the conference report and against its

consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

 

**SUPPLEMENT TO REGISTRANT’S REGISTRATION STATEMENTS ON FORM S-8**

 

In accordance with the requirements of Form S-8, theregistrant hereby supplements any discussion of the indemnification provisions of the registrant in all of the registrant’s registration statements previously filed on Form S-8 with the following undertaking: 

 

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under theSecurities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and ExchangeCommission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurredor paid by a director, officer, or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, theregistrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in theAct and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
99–008

107TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 107–463

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 3994,

AFGHANISTAN FREEDOM SUPPORT ACT OF 2002

MAY 15 (legislative day, MAY 14), 2002.—Referred to the House Calendar and

ordered to be printed

Mr. DIAZ-BALART, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

R E P O R T

[To accompany H. Res. 419]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 419, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3994, to authorize economic and democratic development assistance for Afghanistan and to authorize military assistance for Afghanistan and certain other foreign countries, under an open rule.

The rule provides one hour of general debate equally divided and

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the

Committee on International Relations. The rule provides that it

shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of

amendment the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on International Relations now printed in the bill.

The rule provides that the committee amendment in the nature

of a substitute shall be considered by title rather than by section.

The rule allows the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole to accord priority in recognition to those Members who have pre-printed

their amendments in the Congressional Record.

Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Æ
§ 219.603 General requirements for random testing programs. ( a ) *General.* To the extent possible, each railroad must ensure that its FRA random testing program is designed and implemented so that each employee performing regulated service on its behalf should reasonably anticipate that he or she may be called for a random test without advance warning at any time while on duty and subject to performing regulated service.
( b ) *Prohibited selection bias.* A random testing program may not have a selection bias or an appearance of selection bias, or appear to provide an opportunity for a regulated employee to avoid complying with this section.
( c ) *Plans.* As required by §§ 219.603 through 219.609, each railroad must submit for FRA approval a random testing plan meeting the requirements of this subpart. The plan must address all regulated employees, as defined in § 219.5.
( d ) *Pools.* Each railroad must construct and maintain random testing pools in accordance with § 219.611.
( e ) *Selections.* Each railroad must conduct random testing selections in accordance with § 219.613.
( f ) *Collections.* Each railroad must perform random testing collections in accordance with § 219.615.
( g ) *Cooperation.* Each railroad and its regulated employees must cooperate with and participate in random testing in accordance with § 219.617.
( h ) *Responsive action.* Each railroad must handle positive random tests and verified refusals to test in accordance with § 219.619.
( i ) *Service agents.* Each railroad may use a service agent to perform its random testing responsibilities in accordance with § 219.621.
( j ) *Records.* Each railroad must maintain records required by this subpart in accordance with § 219.623.
#### Cathryne Stack, Respondent, *v.*The Village of Phelps, Appellant.

*Stack*v. *Village of Phelps,*134 App. Div. 908, affirmed.

(Argued November 28, 1910;

decided December 13, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 12, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through defendant’s negligence.

*Frank Rice*for appellant.

*W. Smith O'Brien*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Collin, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 27 (Friday, February 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9388-9389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02803]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9777-1]

Clean Air Act Advisory Committee (CAAAC): Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established the 
Clean Air Act Advisory Committee (CAAAC) on November 19, 1990, to 
provide independent advice and counsel to EPA on policy issues 
associated with implementation of the Clean Air Act of 1990. The 
Committee advises on economic, environmental, technical, scientific and 
enforcement policy issues.

DATES:  Dates & Addresses: Open meeting notice; Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 
App. 2 Section 10(a) (2), notice is hereby given that the Clean Air Act 
Advisory Committee will hold its next open meeting on February 27, 2013 
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at the Crowne Plaza Old Town Alexandria 
located at 901 North Fairfax Street, Alexandria, VA 22314. Seating will 
be available on a first come, first served basis. The Permits, New 
Source Review and Toxics Subcommittee will meet at the same location on 
February 26, 2013 from 1:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. The agenda for the

[[Page 9389]]

CAAAC full committee meeting will be posted on the Clean Air Act 
Advisory Committee Web site at http://www.epa.gov/oar/caaac/.
    Inspection of Committee Documents: The Committee agenda and any 
documents prepared for the meeting will be publicly available at the 
meeting. Thereafter, these documents, together with CAAAC meeting 
minutes, will be available by contacting the Office of Air and 
Radiation Docket and requesting information under docket EPA-HQ-OAR-
2004-0075. The Docket office can be reached by email at: a-and-r-Docket@epa.gov or FAX: 202-566-9744.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the CAAAC, please contact 
Pat Childers, Office of Air and Radiation, U.S. EPA (202) 564-1082, FAX 
(202) 564-1352 or by mail at U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation 
(Mail code 6102 A), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20004. 
For information on the Permits, New Source Review and Toxics 
subcommittee, please contact Liz Naess at (919) 541-1892. Additional 
Information on these meetings, CAAAC, and its Subcommittees can be 
found on the CAAAC Web site: http://www.epa.gov/oar/caaac/.
    For information on access or services for individuals with 
disabilities, please contact Mr. Pat Childers at (202) 564-1082 or 
childers.pat@epa.gov. To request accommodation of a disability, please 
contact Mr. Childers, preferably at least 10 days prior to the meeting, 
to give EPA as much time as possible to process your request.

    Dated: February 1, 2013.
Pat Childers,
Designated Federal Official, Clean Air Act Advisory Committee, Office 
of Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2013-02803 Filed 2-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```