alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: cindy nugent [mailto:nugentcindy@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 3:25 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

VOTE NO ON RIN 1210-AB33 GOVEMENT NEEDS TO STAY OUT OF PEOPLES

RETIREMENT PENISIONS CINDY
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,410
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,738
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,550
<PP&E>                                          52,945
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,984
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           123
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,884
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    63,062
<SALES>                                          5,951
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,408
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,126
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,990
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 510
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (218)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,803
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,021)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,021)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.46)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report of Heritage Worldwide, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jean Claude Mas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Qxley
Act  of  2002,  that;

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.

     A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.

/s/  Jean  Claude  Mas
----------------------
Chief  Executive  Officer
March  19,  2004


                                       19
<PAGE>
§ 555.17 Termination of temporary exemptions. The Administrator may terminate or modify a temporary exemption if (s)he determines that: ( a ) The temporary exemption was granted on the basis of false, fraudulent, or misleading representations or information; or
( b ) The temporary exemption is no longer consistent with the public interest and the objectives of the Act.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-10193

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

THURMAN J. KITCHEN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:10-CR-159-1

Before SMITH, PRADO, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Thurman J. Kitchen

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Kitchen has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

counsel’s assessmentthat the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

March 1, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 11-10193 Document: 00512161471 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/01/2013
No. 11-10193

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 11-10193 Document: 00512161471 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/01/2013
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-968

_____________________________

ROGER VON EVANS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Angela M. Cox, Judge.

September 18, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, OSTERHAUS, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Roger Von Evans, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
NORWEST FINANCIAL INC AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         151,445
<SECURITIES>                                 1,106,703
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,247,747
<ALLOWANCES>                                   305,343
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         231,695
<DEPRECIATION>                                 113,210
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,383,283
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                      7,334,233<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,855
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,423,545
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,383,283
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               447,151
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               175,028
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                67,176
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             114,350
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 90,597
<INCOME-TAX>                                    31,907
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    58,690
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>NORWEST FINANCIAL INC HAS A NON-CLASSIFIED BALANCE
SHEET SO THIS INFORMATION IS UNAVAILABLE.
<F2>INCLUDES $2.0 BILLION OF SHORT-TERM LOANS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 47

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a postage stamp

should be issued honoring American farm women.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 14, 2001

Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin (for himself, Ms. HOOLEY of Oregon, Mr. BUYER,

Mr. BARRETT, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. KLECZKA, Mr. NETHERCUTT, Mr.

PETRI, and Mr. RANGEL) submitted the following resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

a postage stamp should be issued honoring American

farm women.

Whereas American farm women have for centuries been critical to the survival of the family farm;

Whereas in 1862 the newly formed Department of Agriculture released a study showing that on 3 out of 4 farms

the wife ‘‘works harder’’ and ‘‘endures more, than any

other on the place’’;

Whereas American farm women played an important role in

the United States victories in the World Wars, when they

and their families took on even greater responsibilities on

the farms, maintaining the food and fiber needs of our
2

•HRES 47 IH

country as millions of men left the farms to fight in the

wars;

Whereas women have been actively involved in critical farm

decisions, such as the buying and selling of land and

farm equipment, estate planning, and developing new

production practices; and

Whereas American farm women play an integral role in farm

tasks, such as tending to animals, field work, bookkeeping, and raising children: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that—

3 (1) the United States Postal Service should

4 issue a postage stamp honoring American farm

5 women; and

6 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee

7 should recommend to the Postmaster General that

8 such a stamp be issued.

Æ
<PAGE>

                       CENTENNIAL HEALTHCARE CORPORATION
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                  (UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                        Three Months                    Six Months
                                                        Ended June 30,                 Ended June 30,
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------
                                                     1996            1997           1996           1997
                                                 -----------     -----------     ----------     ----------  
<S>                                                <C>             <C>            <C>            <C>
Average outstanding shares used in the
  computation of per share earnings

  Common stock issued                              2,044,320       2,086,875      2,044,320      2,086,875
  Common stock in treasury                          (239,860)       (239,860)      (239,860)      (239,860)
  Special voting common stock                      2,941,325       2,942,818      2,941,325      2,942,277
  Stock option common stock equivalents               38,469          37,849         38,469         37,849
                                                 -----------     -----------     ----------     ----------  

     Average shares outstanding                    4,784,254       4,827,682      4,784,254      4,827,141
                                                 ===========     ===========     ==========     ==========  


Income before accretion and dividends
  on preferred stock                               1,034,171       1,883,924        929,054      3,124,536

Accretion and dividends on preferred stock(a)       (471,976)       (432,258)    (1,009,634)    (1,218,621)
                                                 -----------     -----------     ----------     ----------  

Income (loss) applicable to common stock         $   562,195     $ 1,451,666     $  (80,580)    $1,905,915
                                                 ===========     ===========     ==========     ==========  


Earnings per share                               $      0.12     $      0.30     $    (0.02)    $     0.39
                                                 ===========     ===========     ==========     ==========  
---------

(a)  For the quarters ended June 30, 1996 and 1997 and the six month period
     ended June 30, 1996 and 1997, the assumed conversion of Series A and B was
     antidilutive, thus the conversion of these shares was not included in the
     average outstanding shares used in the computation of per share earnings
     and the dividends and accretion associated with these shares was deducted
     from net earnings applicable to common stock.


</TABLE>
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

18 March 2004

In Case C-314/01 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesvergabeamt): Siemens AG Österreich, ARGE Telekom & Partner v Hauptverband der österreichischen Sozialversicherungsträger (1)

(Public contracts - Directive 89/665/EEC - Review procedures concerning the award of public contracts - Effects of a decision by the body responsible for review procedures annulling the decision by the contracting authority not to revoke the procedure by which a contract was awarded - Restriction on the use of subcontracting)

(2004/C 106/04)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-314/01: References to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Bundesvergabeamt (Austria) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Siemens AG Österreich, ARGE Telekom & Partner and Hauptverband der österreichischen Sozialversicherungsträger; Joined party: Bietergemeinschaft EDS/ORGA, on the interpretation of Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts (OJ 1989 L 395, p. 33), as amended by Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts (OJ 1992 L 209, p. 1), the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of: V. Skouris, acting for the President of the Sixth Chamber, C. Gulmann, J.-P. Puissochet, R. Schintgen (Rapporteur) and N. Colneric, Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 18 March 2004, in which it has ruled:

Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts, as amended by Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts, and in particular Articles 1(1) and 2(7) thereof, must be construed as meaning that, in the case where a clause in an invitation to tender is incompatible with Community rules on public contracts, the national legal systems of the Member States must provide for the possibility of relying on that incompatibility in the review procedures referred to in Directive 89/665.

----

(1)OJ C 317 of 10.11.2001.

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fact Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jacqueline Danforth, President and Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  May 14, 2008

By:  /s/ Jacqueline Danforth

Name:  Jacqueline Danforth

Title:    President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal

Accounting Officer)
§ 663.5 Definitions. As used in this part— ( a ) *Pre-award* means that period in the procurement process before the recipient enters into a formal contract with the supplier.
( b ) *Post-delivery* means the time period in the procurement process from when the rolling stock is delivered to the recipient until title to the rolling stock is transferred to the recipient or the rolling stock is put into revenue service, whichever is first.
( c ) *Recipient* means a recipient of Federal financial assistance from FTA.
( d ) *Revenue service* means operation of rolling stock for transportation of fare-paying passengers as anticipated by the recipient.
( e ) *Rolling stock* means buses, vans, cars, railcars, locomotives, trolley cars and buses, ferry boats, and vehicles used for guideways and incline planes.
( f ) *Audit* means a review resulting in a report containing the necessary certifications of compliance with Buy America standards, purchaser's requirements specifications, and, where appropriate, a manufacturer's certification of compliance with or inapplicability of the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, required by section 319 of STURAA and this part.
( g ) *FTA* means the Federal Transit Administration.
#### § 512.11 What if I need an extension of time?

If a person is unable to submit the necessary information required under § 512.4 at the time the claimed confidential information is submitted to NHTSA, then that person may request an extension of time. Any request for an extension shall explain the reason for the extension of time and the length of time requested.
-----Original Message----- 

From: danleonik@fastmail.fm [mailto:danleonik@fastmail.fm] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 11:41 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 

Dear Department of Treasury, Labor: 

I understand that you are interested in input concerning the changing 

of the rules on the 401K and possibly other retirement plans. Among 

these changes are those which would would allow the federal government 

to seize a citizens retirement nest egg and give them a monthly 

payment. 

These changes, if they are to be made, should only be allowed 

voluntarily or not at all. The federal government has a history of 

financial blunders, waste, and corruption with our money and SHOULD NOT 

VIOLATE THE ORIGINAL INTENT OF OUR RETIREMENT ACCOUNTS. 

This means do not change the policy, especially for those who are at or 

near retirement age. 

Regards, 

Daniel Leonik
-----Original Message----- 

From: RASAP [mailto:rasap@qwest.net] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 8:16 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: IRA/401K Confiscation 

I am 100% against the government annuitizing my private retirement 

account. All of us who have these accounts put the money away using 

these investment vehicles because the government was offering tax 

incentives to do so. Before tax dollars were saved with the intention 

to be withdrawn at a later date at lower interest rates. 

As we see this won't happen because rates will rise. However, the 

proposed or at least discussed option of 3% over COLA return is not 

something I am interested in. Especially if the intentions is to make 

me pay for my own annuity by taking 50% of the remaining cash as a 

death tax. Where is the benefit? 

Please keep you hands off our retirements. You have already screwed 

the tax payers of this nation by printing trillions of dollars. 

Tom Sweet
<Page>

                                                                          [LOGO]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 14 to Registration
Statement No. 33-63935 of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company Variable
Account D on Form N-4, of our report dated February 25, 2004 relating to the
statements of assets and liabilities of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company
Variable Account D as of December 31, 2003, and the related statements of
operations for the year then ended and the statements of changes in net
assets for each of the two years ended December 31, 2003 appearing in the
Statement of Additional Information, which is part of such Registration
Statement, and to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such
Statement of Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
April 5, 2004
-----Original Message----- 

From: blohrenz1@new.rr.com [mailto:blohrenz1@new.rr.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 12:06 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: 2010 investment advise proposal rule 

To Whowm it May Concern: 

Most 401-k plan participants need investment advice. I hope you don't 

regulate people like myself who give good advice so much that the 

people who need our help are unable to get it. Getting rid of the bad 

apples in the industry that spoil the good the rest of us do would be a 

better use of your time. 

Just requiring index funds is not in the best interest of participants 

either. There are situations and times in a persons life when a managed 

mutual fund is much better for the participant. And as the participant 

gets close to retirement an index fund isn't the right place for all of 

a participant's money either. They may need something that can give 

them guaranteed income for life. 

So please don't create regulations that prevent us from helping the 

people we are trained to help. 

Bill Lohrenz
#### Moritz Bauer, Respondent, v. Benjamin A. Willis, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinions by Brady, J., and by Davis, P. J., dissenting.
From: Rog Klein [mailto:rogklein@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 7:27 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

I am an individual investor. Please do not adopt DOL’s proposed rule limiting my ability to 

trade listed options in an IRA. Why do you want to prevent me from making investment choices 

on my own? What is your basis for assuming that options are inherently unwise choices for an 

IRA? Why is an option worse that buying or selling a stock? Please do not assume that your 

evaluation of desirable investments is superior to that of the hundreds of thousands of 

individuals making decisions each day for the financial well-being of themselves and their 

families.

 Thank you.

Roger Klein
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: 

DESIGNATION OF CHAIR AND VICECHAIR OF THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD 

OF PENNSYLVANIA

:

:

:

:

:

No. 299

DISCIPLINARY BOARD APPOINTMENT 

DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23

rd day of May, 2018, Brian J. Cali, Esquire, is hereby 

designated as Chair, and Andrew J. Trevelise, Esquire, as Vice-Chair, of the 

Disciplinary Board of Pennsylvania, commencing August 7, 2018.