alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Hamptons Luxury Homes, Inc.. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Roy Dalene, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Roy Dalene



Roy Dalene

Chief Executive Officer

August 3, 2005
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Business and Economy    >Wholesale    >Monthly    >FAQs
 Skip to looking for section Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  Monthly Wholesale Trade Frequently Asked Questions
  General FAQs
  General Questions about the Monthly Wholesale Trade Survey
  Sample Revision FAQs
  Questions Related to the Monthly Wholesale Trade Sample Revision
  Natural Disaster FAQs
  Questions Related to Monthly Wholesale Trade and Natural Disasters
 Last Revised: October 08, 2021


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6378

DONALD E. GRIFFIN, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ALICE MASICO; AARON JOYNER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock 

Hill. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (0:17-cv-02852-DCC)

Submitted: July 16, 2019 Decided: July 19, 2019

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Eugene Griffin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jerome Scott Kozacki, WILLCOX 

BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Donald E. Griffin, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to Defendants 

in Griffin’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil rights action. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Griffin v. Masico, No. 0:17-cv-02852-DCC (D.S.C. Feb. 14, 2019). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in 

the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ESHARE COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           7,197
<SECURITIES>                                     7,039
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,621
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,492
<INVENTORY>                                      2,173
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,935
<PP&E>                                          24,731
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (13,960)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  79,859
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,751
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            69
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,108
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    79,859
<SALES>                                         64,051
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                64,051
<CGS>                                           22,272
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,272
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,001
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,518
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,966)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,788)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,178)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,178)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.15)


</TABLE>
From: Shelly [mailto:shelly87c@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 12:04 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

In regard to: 

• 13. Should some form of lifetime income distribution option be required for 

defined contribution plans (in addition to money purchase pension plans)? If so, 

should that option be the default distribution option, and should it apply to the 

entire account balance? To what extent would such a requirement encourage or 

discourage plan sponsorship? 

My answer is NO! Keep your hand OFF my retirement! The government has no 

business trying to control or dip into the hard earned money of the American Tax 

payer! You’ve already messed up Social Security...stay FAR AWAY from my other 

plans! 

"The trouble with Socialism is, sooner or later you run out of other people's money." ~Margaret 

Thatcher:

S. Coleman 

American Tax Payer
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/19/15 11:51 AM

Received: July 14, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jz1-kkny

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2232

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Faye N

General Comment

Please do not further regulate our 401k plan.

I find it insulting the DOL says On page 4 of the proposed regulation, seldom can Americans 

prudently manage retirement benefits on their own and that they generally cannot distinguish 

good investments from bad.

If me and my husband have been prudent enough to save for our retirement, why limit our 

investments and add more cost for small investors like ourselves?
Filed 11/7/06 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2006 ND 222

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Al Lamonte Davis, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20060033

Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Gary H. Lee, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Rozanna C. Larson (argued), Assistant State’s Attorney, Courthouse, P.O. Box 5005, Minot, ND 58702-5005, for plaintiff and appellee.

Bonnie P. Humphrey (argued), Heritage Place, 201 S. Main, Ste. 200, Minot, ND 58701, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Davis

No. 20060033

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Al Davis appeals from a judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of carrying a concealed firearm and possessing a short-barreled shotgun.  Davis argues he did not receive effective assistance of counsel, his statement to the police should have been suppressed because he was not read his Miranda rights, the charges should have been severed into separate trials, and there was insufficient evidence to support the jury verdict.

[¶2]Davis’s entire argument is based upon his underlying ineffective assistance of counsel claim.  To establish ineffective assistance, he must prove (1) his counsel's performance was deficient such that it fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and (2) his counsel's deficient performance prejudiced him.  Klose v. State, 2005 ND 192, ¶ 9, 705 N.W.2d 809.  We strongly prefer an ineffective assistance claim be brought in an application for post-conviction relief.  This procedure ensures an adequate evidentiary record, allowing closer inquiry into the reasons underlying counsel's conduct.  State v. Causer, 2004 ND 75, ¶ 19, 678 N.W.2d 552.  Nevertheless, we will, on direct appeal, examine the entire record to determine if counsel’s assistance was plainly defective.  Id.  Counsel’s assistance is plainly defective when the record affirmatively shows ineffectiveness of constitutional dimensions or the defendant points to some evidence in the record supporting the claim.  Id.  “When the record on direct appeal is inadequate to determine whether the defendant received ineffective assistance, the defendant may pursue the ineffectiveness claim at a post-conviction proceeding where an adequate record can be made.”  State v. Strutz, 2000 ND 22, ¶ 26, 606 N.W.2d 886.

[¶3]The record is inadequate to determine whether the defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶4]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 323 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 118
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 323

                          [Report No. 107-352]

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 79) 
making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2002, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

            December 20 (legislative day, December 19), 2001

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and order to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 79) 
making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2002, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 79) making further continuing 
appropriations for the fiscal year 2002, and for other purposes. The 
joint resolution shall be considered as read for amendment. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the joint 
resolution to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate on the joint resolution equally divided and controlled 
by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit.

                                                 House Calendar No. 118

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 323

                          [Report No. 107-352]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 79) 
making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2002, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

            December 20 (legislative day, December 19), 2001

         Referred to the House Calendar and order to be printed
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 445 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 445

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with regard to the 
United States National Soccer Team and its historic performance in the 
                    2002 FIFA World Cup tournament.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 17, 2002

  Mr. Watts of Oklahoma submitted the following resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with regard to the 
United States National Soccer Team and its historic performance in the 
                    2002 FIFA World Cup tournament.

Whereas the performance of the United States National Soccer Team in the 2002 
        FIFA World Cup is the most successful in the history of our 
        participation in the tournament;
Whereas the United States National Team surprised the world by advancing out of 
        the first round of play and reaching the quarterfinals;
Whereas by reaching the quarterfinals the United States signaled that it has 
        become a leading competitor in international soccer;
Whereas the 3 goals scored in the first game victory were the most ever scored 
        in 1 game by a United States men's team in the World Cup;
Whereas the United States National Team advanced out of group play into the 
        second round of the World Cup for just the third time;
Whereas the 2 to 0 win in the second round was the first time the United States 
        National Team has won a game in a ``knock-out'' round of the World Cup;
Whereas this win marks the first time since 1930 that a United States team has 
        advanced to the quarterfinals of the World Cup;
Whereas the Team's achievement reflects the explosive growth in popularity of 
        soccer in the United States;
Whereas the United States National Team's performance symbolizes the emerging 
        role of soccer for young Americans in sports and society; and
Whereas the United States National Team's performance speaks to parents about 
        the importance of athletic participation for building character and 
        confidence in their children: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates the United States National Soccer Team 
        for its historic performance in the 2002 World Cup;
            (2) recognizes Bruce Arena, the head coach of the United 
        States Team, and every player on the Team for their dedication 
        to excellence; and
            (3) commends the United States Soccer Federation and 
        coaches and parents of young soccer players around the country 
        for their role in the success of soccer in the United States.
                                 <all>
```
From: Joseph Ortiz [mailto:joseph.m.ortiz@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 3:28 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Regarding RIN 1210-AB33

To whom it may concern, 

I have a broken system that needs more fixing, Social Security. Get to work replacing the 

borrowed funds there, and stay away from 401k's. Why on earth would anyone trust you 

with their 401k's considering the mismanagement of other "social" programs? 

-- 

Joseph M.Ortiz 

Phone Number : (773) 369-1975 

Email : joseph.m.ortiz@gmail.com
#### § 585.35 Response to inquiries.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 67886, Aug. 22, 2024.

At any time during the production year ending August 31, 2010, each manufacturer shall, upon request from the Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, provide information identifying the vehicles (by make, model and vehicle identification number) that have been certified as complying with the requirements of Standard No. 208 when using the child restraint systems specified in Appendix A-1 of that standard. The manufacturer's designation of a vehicle as a certified vehicle is irrevocable.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.09 MB)
 
 4th Brigade 215th corps Afghan national Army Ana cycle helmand province tfsw 2nd Kandak task force southwest CENTER regional Operational training readiness MILITARY
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
IV

House Calendar No. 167

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 433

[Report No. 107–490]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (S. 1372) to reauthorize the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 4, 2002

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (S. 1372) to reauthorize the ExportImport Bank of the United States.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (S. 1372) to reauthorize the Export-Im4 port Bank of the United States. All points of order against

5 the conference report and against its consideration are

6 waived.
House Calendar No. 167

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 433

[Report No. 107–490]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the bill (S. 1372) to reauthorize the Export-Import Bank of the United

States.

JUNE 4, 2002

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
EXHIBIT
32





Certification
of Periodic Report by the Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant
to, and for purposes only of, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned hereby certifies
that (i) the Quarterly Report of Shore Bancshares, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Shore Bancshares, Inc.





Date:
      August 10, 2009
              BY:
              /s/ W. Moorhead VermilyeW.
      Moorhead VermilyePresident/Chief
      Executive Officer





Date:
      August 10, 2009
              BY:
              /s/ Susan E. LeavertonSusan
      E. Leaverton, CPATreasurer/Principal
      Accounting Officer