alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION



### April 4, 2008 J. 

### I. Palmer, Jr. Regional Administrator US EPA, Region

### N Atlanta Federal Center, 1 2'hFloor Division of Air Pollution Control 9' 

### Floor, L&C Annex

40 1Church Street Nashville, 

### TN 37243

61 Forsyth Street, SW Atlanta, GA 30303-3104 RE: Attainment Demonstration and State ImplementationPlan for the Knoxville, Tennessee PM2.5 Nonattainment Area Dear Mr. Palmer; I am pleased to submit the enclosed Attainment Demonstration and State Implementation Plan for the Knoxville PM2,5 Nonattainment Area. This submittal fulfills the requirements of the Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule (40 CFR 51 Subpart 

### Z) and Section 110 of the Federal Clean Air Act. The Attainment Demonstration projects that the area will attain the NAAQS based on the implementation of existing Federal measures. The Environmental Protection Agency is requested to process the enclosed material as part of the federally approved State Implementation Plan. We have worked closely with your staff throughout the process and greatly appreciate their timely efforts and consideration regarding this matter. If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me at (61 5) 532-0554.

Enclosures CC: Beverly Banister, EPA Region N (Letter only) Lynarae Benjamin, EPA Region N James 

### Hou, EPA Region IV


### . Dick Schutt, EPA Region NSTATE OF TENNESSEE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD



### IN THE MATTER OF: 

## 1

' 

### 1 PROPOSED STATE IMPLEMENTATIONPLAN ) ATTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION ) FOR THE KNOXVILLE ANNUAL PM2.s NONATTAMNTAREA ) ORDERNO. 08-004



### BOARD 

### ORDER The Knoxville, Tennessee PM2.5nonattainmentarea includes Anderson,Blount, Knox, andLoudon Counties in their entirety, as well asthe portion ofRoane Countythat fallswithinthe censusblock that includesthe Tennessee Valley Authority's Kingston Fossil Plant. Between 2001 and 2003, air quality monitoring at several sites within this region indicated that the annual average PMzs concentrations exceeded the 15.0 pg/ms National Ambient Air Quality Standard, and the area was designated 

### as nonattainment, effective April 5,2605. The Tennessee Air Pollution Control Board finds that the Attainment Demonstration for the Knoxville, Tennessee Annual PM2, Nonattainment Area projects that the counties listed above will attain the annual PM2.S National Ambient Air Quality Standard and approves the submittal of the Attainment Demonstration to U. S. EPA for adoptionintoTennessee's StateImpIementation Plan. Approved on April 4,2008, by the members ofthe TennesseeAir Pollution Control Board as follows:
Editorial Note on Part 393
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 393 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 393.65 All fuel systems. ( a ) *Application of the rules in this section.* The rules in this section apply to systems for containing and supplying fuel for the operation of motor vehicles or for the operation of auxiliary equipment installed on, or used in connection with, motor vehicles.
( b ) *Location.* Each fuel system must be located on the motor vehicle so that— ( 1 ) No part of the system extends beyond the widest part of the vehicle;
( 2 ) No part of a fuel tank is forward of the front axle of a power unit;
( 3 ) Fuel spilled vertically from a fuel tank while it is being filled will not contact any part of the exhaust or electrical systems of the vehicle, except the fuel level indicator assembly;
( 4 ) Fill pipe openings are located outside the vehicle's passenger compartment and its cargo compartment;
( 5 ) A fuel line does not extend between a towed vehicle and the vehicle that is towing it while the combination of vehicles is in motion; and
( 6 ) No part of the fuel system of a bus manufactured on or after January 1, 1973, is located within or above the passenger compartment.
( c ) *Fuel tank installation.* Each fuel tank must be securely attached to the motor vehicle in a workmanlike manner.
( d ) *Gravity or syphon feed prohibited.* A fuel system must not supply fuel by gravity or syphon feed directly to the carburetor or injector.
( e ) *Selection control valve location.* If a fuel system includes a selection control valve which is operable by the driver to regulate the flow of fuel from two or more fuel tanks, the valve must be installed so that either— ( 1 ) The driver may operate it while watching the roadway and without leaving his/her driving position; or
( 2 ) The driver must stop the vehicle and leave his/her seat in order to operate the valve.
( f ) *Fuel lines.* A fuel line which is not completely enclosed in a protective housing must not extend more than 2 inches below the fuel tank or its sump. Diesel fuel crossover, return, and withdrawal lines which extend below the bottom of the tank or sump must be protected against damage from impact. Every fuel line must be— ( 1 ) Long enough and flexible enough to accommodate normal movements of the parts to which it is attached without incurring damage; and
( 2 ) Secured against chafing, kinking, or other causes of mechanical damage.
( g ) *Excess flow valve.* When pressure devices are used to force fuel from a fuel tank, a device which prevents the flow of fuel from the fuel tank if the fuel feed line is broken must be installed in the fuel system.
[36 FR 15445, Aug. 14, 1971, as amended at 37 FR 4341, Mar. 2, 1972; 37 FR 28752, Dec. 29, 1972]
mailto:e-ORI@dol.gov

http://www.ici.org/pdf/fm-v19n6.pdf

../../AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/3G9KS7ZJ/www.ici.org/trdf/testimony/091_target_fund_tmny

../../AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/3G9KS7ZJ/www.ici.org/trdf/testimony/09_target_fund_supp_tmny

http://www.ici.org/pdf/rpt_06_inv_prefs_full.pdf

http://www.ici.org/pdf/rpt_riskdiscl.pdf

http://webapps.dol.gov/FederalRegister/PdfDisplay.aspx?DocId=13321
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

Received: October 27, 2017

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1k1-8zge-v9qj

Comments Due: December 11, 2017

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2015-0017

Claims Procedure for Plans Providing Disability Benefits; Extension of Applicability 

Date

Comment On: EBSA-2015-0017-0291

Claims Procedure: Plans Providing Disability Benefits

Document: EBSA-2015-0017-DRAFT-0401

Comment on FR Doc # 2017-22082

Submitter Information

Name: Sarah Burns

General Comment

Dear Mr. Hauser,

I am an attorney who represents claimants in disability and health claims under 

ERISA.

I am requesting that the Secretary of Labor not delay the effective date of the Final 

ERISA claims regulations adopted on December 19, 2016 . ERISA plans and 

insurance companies are now seeking to undo the regulations after the fact without 

going through the rule making process. These parties had ample opportunity to voice 

their concerns and to provide data supporting their new allegations on cost and other 

purported challenges by the new regulations.

The limited information from the Secretary's office suggests the final rules are under 

reconsideration, but there is a lack of transparency from the Secretary. The Secretary 

has not advised the exact nature of the information prompting reconsideration and 

why the information was not provided to the Secretary and evaluated during the 

comment period. To grant ERISA plans and insurance companies an extension at this 
point has the appearance of favoritism and is likely to require the Departments of 

Labor and Justice to expend substantial resources defending the litigation contesting 

the violations of the rulemaking process under the Administrative Procedure Act 

(APA) of 1946 (5 U.S.C. 551 et seq.).
§ 625.43 SGR performance measures for capital assets. ( a ) *Equipment: (non-revenue) service vehicles.* The performance measure for non-revenue, support-service and maintenance vehicles equipment is the percentage of those vehicles that have either met or exceeded their ULB.
( b ) *Rolling stock.* The performance measure for rolling stock is the percentage of revenue vehicles within a particular asset class that have either met or exceeded their ULB.
( c ) *Infrastructure: rail fixed-guideway, track, signals, and systems.* The performance measure for rail fixed-guideway, track, signals, and systems is the percentage of track segments with performance restrictions.
( d ) *Facilities.* The performance measure for facilities is the percentage of facilities within an asset class, rated below condition 3 on the TERM scale.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2011 - 04 5 6 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2011 -NE - 1 5 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### SP3 201 EN - E

**ASE** Printed Name **:** 

### Alan Strom 8/24/11 **Date**

**Branch Manager Date**
ISAF Commander Condemns Attacks
 By None  , ISAF Public Affairs Office
   “I condemn today’s attack at the Afghan Ministry of Interior that killed two of our coalition officers, and my thoughts and prayers are with the families and loved ones of the brave individuals lost today,” said Gen. John R. Allen, commander of the International Security Assistance Force. “We are investigating the crime and will pursue all leads to find the person responsible for this attack. The perpetrator of this attack is a coward whose actions will not go unanswered.” “For obvious force protection reasons, I have also taken immediate measures to recall all other ISAF personnel working in ministries in and around Kabul,” continued Gen. Allen. “We are committed to our partnership with the Government of Afghanistan to reach our common goal of a peaceful, stable and secure Afghanistan in the near future.”
QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document





Exhibit 32.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Helene Simonet certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Coherent, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Coherent, Inc.





Date: November 30, 2011


By:/s/ HELENE SIMONETHelene SimonetExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer














QuickLinks


Exhibit 32.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
#### § 835.8 Testimony by current Board employees regarding prior activity.

Any testimony regarding any accident within the Board's jurisdiction, or any expert testimony arising from employment prior to Board service is prohibited absent approval by the General Counsel. Approval shall only be given if testimony will not violate § 835.1 and § 835.3, and is subject to whatever conditions the General Counsel finds necessary to promote the purposes of this part as set forth in § 835.1 and § 835.3.

[63 FR 71608, Dec. 29, 1998]
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 406

Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifice made by

the men and women killed or disabled while serving as peace officers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 1, 2002

Mr. HEFLEY (for himself, Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr. STUPAK, Mr. CONYERS, and

Mr. SENSENBRENNER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifice made by the men and women killed or disabled

while serving as peace officers.

Whereas the well-being of all people of the United States is

preserved and enhanced as a direct result of the vigilance

and dedication of law enforcement personnel;

Whereas more than 700,000 law enforcement personnel, at

great risk to their personal safety, serve their fellow citizens as guardians of peace;

Whereas peace officers are on the front line in preserving the

right of the children of the United States to receive an

education in a crime-free environment, a right that is all

too often threatened by the insidious fear caused by violence in schools;
2

•HRES 406 IH

Whereas 70 peace officers died at the World Trade Center in

New York City on September 11, 2001, the most peace

officers ever killed in a single incident in the history of

the Nation;

Whereas more than 220 peace officers across the Nation were

killed in the line of duty during 2001, which represents

57 percent more police fatalities than the previous year

and makes 2001 the deadliest year for the law enforcement community since 1974;

Whereas every year, 1 out of every 9 peace officers is assaulted, 1 out of every 25 peace officers is injured, and

1 out of every 4,400 peace officers is killed in the line

of duty; and

Whereas on May 15, 2002, more than 15,000 peace officers

are expected to gather in Washington, D.C. to join with

the families of their recently fallen comrades to honor

those comrades and all others who went before them:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That—

2 (1) it is the sense of the House that there

3 should be established a Peace Officers Memorial Day

4 in honor of Federal, State, and local peace officers

5 killed or disabled in the line of duty; and

6 (2) the House calls upon the people of the

7 United States to observe such a day with appro8 priate ceremonies and respect.

Æ
Mine dog teams get ready for action
 By Sgt. Robert Larson , CJTF-101
  CENTCOM
 BAGRAM AIR FIELD, Afghanistan (Dec. 31, 2010) — Ever heard the phrase, “Every dog has its day”? Well, the mine detection dogs and handlers from the 49th Mine Dog  Detachment, 54th Engineer Battalion, Task Force Dolch, based at Bagram  Air Field, know that better than most. These highly trained animals are  used to help soldiers on the ground find some of the most elusive  enemies in theater - landmines and improvised explosive devices.  The 49th MDD, attached to TF Dolch for their deployment to Afghanistan,  consists of only a handful of soldiers who are responsible for  conducting clearance operations alongside multiple route clearance  patrols and many other missions that TF Dolch Sappers execute. Sappers  are elite Ranger-like combat engineers who work with demolitions. The dogs are tested regularly to ensure they can maintain the high find  rates required of their job. Using actual land mines and munitions found  around Bagram that coalition explosive ordnance detachment members  rendered inert, the handlers built training lanes designed to help keep  their companions mission ready at all times. “We have anti-personnel mines, anti-tank mines (and) anti-personnel  landmines that are used as boosters for anti-tank mines, hand grenades,  artillery rounds and everything in between,” said U.S. Army Sgt. John  Bornhoff of the 49th MDD and resident of North Prairie, Wis. There are 10 training and testing lanes, which are one meter wide by 10  meters long each. Bricks divide the lanes, and random ordnances are  buried throughout. “The dogs will key on even the slightest explosive scent that, (when)  combined with a visual signature, will give the dog more than it needs  to know that something is there,” said Bornhoff. The presence of the MDD gives the soldiers of TF Dolch a bit more confidence and a nice morale boost. “Just being able to be around the dogs makes the morale of the soldiers  that much better,” said U.S. Army Capt. William Robinson Jr., chaplain  for the 54th Engr. Bn., TF Dolch, and native of Youngstown, Ohio. The MDD is a great asset for TF Dolch soldiers to remove at least some  of the unexploded ordnance and IED threats military personnel and local  civilians face in Afghanistan.
#### Willis M. Parker *v.*First National Bank.

February Term, 1915.

Present: Munson, C. J., Watson, Haselton, Powers, and Taylor, JJ.

Opinion filed May 10, 1915.

*Bankruptcy*— Banks—Preference—Bank *Deposits*— Application *on Bankrupt’s Overdue Promissory Note.*

A bank that knows that one of its depositors, having a general deposit subject to check in the usual course of business, is about to file a voluntary petition in bankruptcy, has the right to apply the deposit on the depositor’s overdue promissory note held by the bank in the usual course of business.

*70Assumpsit. Plea, the general issue. Trial by the city court of Montpelier, *Moody,*Acting Judge, on an agreed statement of facts. Judgment for defendant to recover its costs. The plaintiff excepted. The opinion states the case.

*F. L. Laird*for the plaintiff.

*Erwin M. Harvey*for the defendant.

Haselton, J.

This is an action of assumpsit heard before the city court of Montpelier, *Moody,*Acting Judge. On an agreed statement of facts judgment was rendered for the defendant, and the plaintiff excepted.

The plaintiff is trustee in bankruptcy of one L. A. Flint. The defendant bank held in the usual course of business a note of Flint’s for thirty-nine hundred dollars. After the note had become due the bank applied thereon the sum of one hundred nine dollars and seventy cents which Flint “had on deposit in the defendant bank in a commercial or check account.” At that time the bank had information that Flint was about to file a petition in bankruptcy. Beyond all question the bank had a right to make this application if the sum applied was a general deposit. *Bank*v. *Massey,*192 U. S. 138, 48 L. ed. 380, 24 Sup. Ct. 199, and cases there cited. But the plaintiff claims that the deposit should be treated as special. However, the agreed facts show no feature of a special deposit, but only that the deposit was general, subject to check in the usual course of business.

The plaintiff does not claim that the subsequent bankruptcy proceedings in any way affect the matter.

*Judgment affirmed.*
#### § 826.8 Awards against the Federal Aviation Administration.

When an applicant is entitled to an award because it prevails over an agency of the United States that participates in a proceeding before the Board and takes a position that is not substantially justified, the award shall be made against that agency.
https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=...

RKEC-]YPLEI-09

MAR 1 8 2010

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION

PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS As of: March 18, 2010
BRANCH Received: March 17, 2010

Status: Posted
PUBLIC SUBMISSION reste: wrens, 2010
Comments Due: May 03, 2010
[Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0006
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants & Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Comment On: IRS-2010-0006-0001
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Document: IRS-2010-0006-0055
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-02028

Submitter Information

Name: Stephen D Moore
Address:
3004 McDaniels
Blue Springs, MO, 64015
Email: moorestephen7@gmail.com
— — — — — SS

General Comment

I have grave concerns regarding using annuities in a defined contribution plan, Given the financial
problems we have seen with insurers lately I don't trust them to exercise proper fiduciary
responsibility. If allowed to sell them they should be required to manage those assets separately
from their other assets.

As long as the states are the chief regulator of insurance companies, and weak, inconsistent
regulators at that, you put beneficiaries at the mercy of insurance salesmen tempted to sell the
product with the best, for them, fee structure. This will also result in more complex regulations
with variations from state to state. If you must introduce an annuity option make it a simple
purchase of a "stream of payments", not the unnecessarily complex variable annuity that is
merely a way to bundle multiple layers of fees for the benefit of the insurer.

Better yet, merely require that each pian provide a DOL created document prior to retirement
that defines what a single life annuity is, what it should cost and where to shop for it. Don't let
the insurer define the product; make the insurer fit a standard definition. You could include an
annually updated study of the range of prices to be paid for a given stream of payments from
various vendors or require any insurer to submit a uniform bid for a single life annuity and a
survivor annuity. No fancy variations. Just have them spell out in a standard form the exact costs
and payments.

Page | of 1

3/18/2010