alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                         255,405
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,408,009
<ALLOWANCES>                                    98,000
<INVENTORY>                                 23,615,159
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,639,848
<PP&E>                                      34,610,370
<DEPRECIATION>                              22,573,220
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,744,452
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,435,617
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          727,411
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,163,414
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,744,452
<SALES>                                    151,878,862
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           151,878,862
<CGS>                                      129,651,654
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              144,887,640
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (262,420)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,241,575
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,012,067
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,012,067
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,012,067
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
From: rjm031964@cs.com [mailto:rjm031964@cs.com] 

Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 10:48 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: lifetime income RFI

I oppose any law, regulation, plan etc. that would allow any government agency to take 

possession of or mandate material changes of form of my retirement plans or IRAs, e.g., forcing 

me to buy government securities or any other financial instrument. This is MY HARD-EARNED 

MONEY and I am an adult with plenty of intellectual capacity to decide what to do with it. Any 

attempt to do anything else than LEAVE people's retirement plans and IRAs alone is theft 

befitting a banana republic, nothing more, nothing less. We really don't need "help" in ANY facet 

of our lives from Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and their leechlike, self-interested, 

sanctimonious, corrupt ilk. 

Sincerely, 

Robert J. Marlowe
#### State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Pamela A. Fiedler, appellant.

571 N.W.2d 789

Filed January 9, 1998.

No. S-96-079.

Robert W. Kortus and Julie A. Frank, of Frank & Gryva, P.C., for appellant.

Connor L. Reuter, Assistant Lincoln City Attorney, for appellee.

Herbert M. Fitle, Omaha City Attorney, and Martin J. Conboy III, Omaha City Prosecutor, and J. Michael Tesar for amicus curiae City of Omaha.

White, C.J., Caporale, Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, and McCormack, JJ.

Per Curiam.

The decision of the Nebraska Court of Appeals *State*v. *Fiedler, 5*Neb. App. 629, 562 N.W.2d 380 (1997), is affirmed by an equally divided court.

Affirmed.

Stephan, J., not participating.
Editorial Note on Part 391
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 391 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 391.65 Drivers furnished by other motor carriers. ( a ) A motor carrier may employ a driver who is not a single-employer driver, as defined in § 390.5, of that motor carrier without complying with the generally applicable driver qualification file requirements in this part, if— ( 1 ) The driver is a single-employer driver for another motor carrier; and
( 2 ) That other motor carrier certifies that the driver is fully qualified to drive a commercial motor vehicle in a written statement which— ( i ) Is signed and dated by an officer or authorized employee of the motor carrier that employs the single-employer driver;
( ii ) Contains the driver's name and signature;
( iii ) Certifies that the driver has been employed as a single-employer driver.
( iv ) Certifies that the driver is fully qualified to drive a commercial motor vehicle under the rules in part 391 of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations;
( v ) States the expiration date of the driver's medical examiner's certificate;
( vi ) Specifies an expiration date for the certificate, which shall be not longer than 2 years or, if earlier, the expiration date of the driver's current medical examiner's certificate; and
( vii ) Is substantially in accordance with the following form: ____________________(Name of driver) ____________________(SS No.) ____________________(Signature of driver) I certify that the above named driver, as defined in § 390.5, is a single-employer driver driving a commercial motor vehicle operated by the below named carrier and is fully qualified under part 391, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations. His/her current medical examiner's certificate expires on ______(Date). This certificate expires: (Date not later than expiration date of medical certificate) Issued on______(date) Issued by__________ (Name of carrier) (Address) (Signature) (Title)
( b ) A motor carrier that obtains a certificate in accordance with paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall: ( 1 ) Contact the motor carrier which certified the driver's qualifications under this section to verify the validity of the certificate. This contact may be made in person, by telephone, or by letter.
( 2 ) Retain a copy of that certificate in its files for three years.
( c ) A motor carrier which certifies a driver's qualifications under this section shall be responsible for the accuracy of the certificate. The certificate is no longer valid if the driver leaves the employment of the motor carrier which issued the certificate or is no longer qualified under the rules in this part.
[41 FR 36656, Aug. 31, 1976, as amended at 53 FR 18057, May 19, 1988; 60 FR 38745, July 28, 1995; 63 FR 33278, June 18, 1998; 67 FR 61824, Oct. 2, 2002; 78 FR 58483, Sept. 24, 2013]
AMENDMENT NO.  2 TO THE
2003 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

The Alpharma Inc. 2003 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (the "Plan") is hereby amended effective as of October 1, 2006, as follows:



1.	Section 4.2 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new paragraph after the second paragraph thereof:

"Notwithstanding anything in this Section 4.2 of the Plan that may suggest otherwise, if one of the events described in the first paragraph hereof is determined by the Committee to be an equity restructuring under FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Shareholder Based Payment, then the Committee shall make such adjustments to the terms of existing Awards as are necessary to prevent dilution of such Awards."



2.	Section 17.2 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following immediately after the first sentence thereof:

"Notwithstanding the foregoing, if as a result of an unusual or nonrecurring event (including, without limitation, the events described in Section 4.2 hereof), which event is determined by the Committee to be an equity restructuring under FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Shareholder Based Payment, then the terms and conditions of the Awards shall be appropriately adjusted by the Committee in order to prevent dilution of the benefit or potential benefits intended to be available under the Plan."
EPA and DoD Meeting February 28 , 2013 Attendees EPA

– Li nda Gerber, Paul Miller, Erin Knighton, L iz McDermott, Tim Smith DoD

– Ed Miller National Guard

– Kristin Thomas DLA Energy

– Laura Fleming , Matt Young, Scott Allan, Everett Bowl, Diane Parks EPA and DoD met to discuss a number of issues from the proposed revisions to the UST regulations. The discussion included proposed changes to previousl y deferred s ys tems, including airport hy drant sy stems and field constructed tanks.
H. Res. 158

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 7, 2001.

Resolved, That the following named Members be and are

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the

House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM: Mr. Duncan.

COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE: Mr. Gilchrest.

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Mr. Shuster.

COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Mr. Ney to rank after Mr. Baker, Mr. Culberson, and

Mr. Shuster.

Attest:

Clerk.
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D. C, 

Motion of 

AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. 

for confidential treatment under Rule 

12 (Form 41, Schedule B-43) 

DOT-OST-1995-569 

MOTION OF AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. 

FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 12 

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to; 

PETER M. BOWLER 

President 

American Eagle Airlines, Inc. 

P.O. Box 619616, MD 5494 

DFW Airport, Texas 75261 

KATHLEEN SOLED 

Vice President & General Counsel 

7\merican Eagle Airlines, Inc. 

P.O. Box 619616, MD 5494 

DFW Airport, Texas 75261 

(817) 967-1574 

kate.soled@aa.com 

CARL B. NELSON, JR. 

Associate General Counsel 

American Airlines, Inc. 

1101 17th Street, N.W. 

Suite 600 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

(202) 496-5647 

carl.nelson@aa.com 

March 30, 2010 
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 

Motion of 

AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. 

for confidential treatment under Rule 

12 (Form 41, Schedule B-43) 

DOT-OST-1995-569 

MOTION OF AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. 

FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 12 

American Eagle Airlines, Inc., under 14 CFR 302.12, 

hereby moves that the enclosed Form 41 Schedule B-43 for YE09 

be accorded confidential treatment and be withheld from public 

disclosure. The information for which confidential treatment 

is requested pertains to 7\merican Eagle's airframes and aircraft engine acquisitions and retirements. As provided in Rule 

12, this information is in a sealed envelope marked "Confidential Treatment Requested Under Rule 12." 
2 -

On June 5, 1995, by letter of James W. Mitchell, 

Director, Office of Airline Statistics, the Department granted 

confidential treatment for a 10-year period to similar data 

filed by American Airlines, Inc. For the reasons stated in Mr, 

Mitchell's letter, the Department should also grant confidential treatment for 10 years to 7\merican Eagle's data. 

WHEREFORE, American Eagle moves that the schedules 

submitted under seal with this motion be withheld from public 

disclosure under Rule 12 for a period of 10 years. 

Respectfully submitted. 

CARL B. NELSON, JR. 

Associate General Counsel 

American Airlines, Inc. 

On behalf of American Eagle 

Airlines, Inc. 

March 30, 2010
From: Marinshaw, Richard
To: Emma Cheuse (echeuse@earthjustice.org)
Cc: Phil Mulrine (Mulrine.Phil@epamail.epa.gov) ; Hancy, Cindy Wang Subject: Cr Electroplating Request
Date: Monday, March 26, 2012 11:50:19 AM
Attachments: Cr Electroplating Docket Index Feb 2012.xls Cr Electroplating MIR Results October 2011.xls

Hello again, Emma,

I have attached a copy of the docket index for the supplemental proposal for Chromium Electroplating.

As for the other files that you attached in your email to Phil Mulrine, they appear to be
intermediate files used in the risk assessment. I am attaching a different file that shows actual and allowable emissions for each plant by process type (hard chromium electroplating, decorative chromium electroplating, chromium anodizing). This file also shows the results of the risk modeling for hazard index (HI) and maximum individual risk (MIR). The emissions are in units of pounds per year (lbs/yr).

Please also note that, for most of the plants, annual emissions were simulated. You can identify those plants for which we had actual data, or which were simulated, by the MACT Code. The three MACT codes for Cr Electroplating are: 1607 for chromium anodizing, 1610 for decorative chromium electroplating, and 1615 for hard chromium electroplating. If the code contains a letter, the
emissions values were simulated. For example,”1615” indicates actual data for a hard chromium electroplating plant, but “1615D” means emissions were simulated’ “1610” means actual decorative chromium emissions, and “1610D” means simulated decorative chromium electroplating emissions. Note that the code “1615D” specifically refers to a plant about which we had no information on the process. Although the number (1615) is the code for hard chromium electroplating, some of these plants were simulated as decorative chromium or as chromium electroplating, to ensure that the modeling results matched our estimates of the total number of each type of plant in the U.S. The Emissions Simulation memo in the docket explains this in more
detail.

Please let me know if you have any question about any of this.

Rick Marinshaw

Richard J. Marinshaw, P.E. Senior Research Environmental Engineer
RTI International
3040 Cornwallis Road
Post Office Box 12194 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0652 IN THE MATTER OF C.L.D., Youths in Need of Care
**ORDER** Upon consideration of Counsel’s M otion to W ithdraw as C ounsel of R ecord , and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Appellant in this matter shall file a response to this motion within thirty (30) days of the date of

this Order. T he response must be served upon all counsel of record, including the Attorney General, the County Attorney, and the Appellate Defender’s Office. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court give notice of this Order by mail to a ll counsel of record and to the Appellant at her last known address.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 11 2022

05/11/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0652
EXHIBIT 23 - ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT













The Board of Directors
Colonial Commercial Corp.
  and Subsidiaries:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 333-37025) on Form S-8 of Colonial Commercial Corp. of our report dated
March 6, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Colonial
Commercial Corp. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the
related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997, which
report is incorporated by reference in the December 31, 1997 annual report on
Form 10-KSB of Colonial Commercial Corp.



                                  /s/   KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP




Jericho, New York
March 24, 1998
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Widepoint Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                          /s/ STEVE L. KOMAR
                                          ------------------------------
                                          Steve L. Komar
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Frederick B. Faitoute, Appellant, *v.*James Creelman et al., Constituting the Municipal Civil Service Commission of the City of New York, Respondents.

*People ex rel. Faitoute*v. *Creelman,*148 App. Div. 890, affirmed.

(Argued April 29, 1912;

decided May 14, 1912.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 1, 1911, which reversed an order of Special Term granting a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel defendants to certify to an increase of salary of relator and denied said motion.

*L. Lajlin Kellogg, Alfred C. Petté*and *James A. Farrell*for appellant.

*Archibald B. Watson, Corporation Counsel (Clarence L. Barber*and *Terence Farley*of counsel), for respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hisoock and Collin, JJ.
From: Barry Lynas [mailto:gblynas@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 5:19 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Change to 401K 

The federal government should not change the current retirement system. We do not 

want the Federal Goverment doing things for us. We like our 401Ks. It is a good 

system. Leave it alone. 

G. Barry Lynas, CLU, ChFC, CPA* 

11204 Promise Land Dr. 

Frisco, TX 75035 

O-469-633-1676 

F-214-387-4654 

* Licensed as a CPA in Louisiana Only, not licensed in Texas.
p.1 

OAR Box 1490 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

26) IV-B-28 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 8/4/2008 11:51:46 AM Sheet 26 of 273 
P.2 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: Docket for the Reinforced Plastic Composites NESHAP 

FROM: Keith Barnett, Environmental Protection Agency 

DATE: February 7, 2003 

SUBJECT: Exemption to requirement to cover mixers for the polymer casting industry. 

At proposal, we placed the following exemption into the rule: 

"Containers of 5 gallons or less may be open when active mixing is taking place, or during periods 

when they are in process (i.e., they are actively being used to apply resin). For polymer casting 

mixing operations, containers of 21 gallons or less may be open while active mixing is taking 

place." 

The reason for the exemption for polymer casting was for this segment ofthe reinforced plastic 

composites industry, facilities typically mix colors in containers up to 21 gallons. It is necessary 

to visually observe the mixing process to insure the final mixture color is uniform. Therefore, 

they cannot cover these containers during the mixing process. 

We received numerous comments after proposal that the typical containers in the industry used to 

mix colors were actually 21.6 gallons, not 21 gallons. 

Because we believe that evaporation during mixing is more a function of surface area than 

volume, we decided to change the basis ofthe exemption to surface area ofthe mixer. 

Data from an equipment vendor indicates that the types of containers used to mix colors in 

polymer casting went up to a 23.5 inch internal diameter. 

Surface area = (23.5/2)2 x 3.14 = 433 square inches. For the exemption we rounded up to 500 

square inches to exclude any mixers that were slightly over 23.5 inches.
H. Res. 482

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 16, 2002.

Whereas Theodore Samuel Williams served his country with

honor and distinction as a Naval Aviator during World

War II and as a Marine fighter pilot during the Korean

War;

Whereas Ted Williams, during his service in the Marines during the Korean War, flew on 39 combat missions and

earned an Air Medal and two Gold Stars;

Whereas Ted Williams’ exploits while playing baseball with

the Boston Red Sox from 1939–1960 led to him being

referred to as ‘‘the greatest hitter who ever lived’’;

Whereas during his career with the Boston Red Sox, Ted

Williams had 2,654 total hits, 521 home runs, and a lifetime batting average of .344, despite losing almost five

full seasons to military service;

Whereas as a member of the Boston Red Sox, Ted Williams

hit for an average of .406 in 1941 and is the last major

league baseball player to hit for an average above .400;

Whereas as a member of the Boston Red Sox, Ted Williams

led the American League in batting six times, in slugging

percentage nine times, in total bases six times, and in

runs scored six times;
2

•HRES 482 EH

Whereas as a member of the Boston Red Sox, Ted Williams

won two Triple Crowns, was twice named the Most Valuable Player of the American League, was chosen as an

American League All-Star 16 times, and was named the

player of the decade for the 1950’s;

Whereas Ted Williams had a career on-base percentage of

.481, the highest in the history of the major leagues;

Whereas Ted Williams was elected to the Baseball Hall of

Fame in 1966; and

Whereas Ted Williams provided invaluable assistance to the

Commonwealth of Massachusetts through his efforts on

behalf of and support for the Jimmy Fund in order to

help eradicate cancer in children: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors

2 the outstanding accomplishments of Ted Williams and ex3 presses its deepest sympathies and condolences to the fam4 ily of Ted Williams on his passing.

Attest:

Clerk.
# U.S. General James Mattis Meets with Egyptian military leaders

/ Published Nov. 16, 2011

TAMPA, Fla. (November 16, 2011) — Gen. James Mattis, Commander United States Central Command, departed Egypt yesterday after calling on senior Egyptian counterparts in the Ministry of Defense.  Gen. Mattis spoke with Lt. Gen Anan, Chief of Staff of the Egyptian Armed Forces and Field Marshal Tantawi, Commander and Chief of the Egyptian Armed Forces to discuss issues of military cooperation within the region and the strong cooperation between our forces. 

The Egypt visit is part of a multi-country visit Mattis is making to the region to increase his awareness of regional issues.  As he departed Cairo, he passed his best wishes to the people of Egypt in this history-making time.
EXHIBIT
21.5
 
 
 METROPOLITAN EDISON
COMPANY
 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE
REGISTRANT
 AT DECEMBER 31,
2006
 
 
 
 Name Of
      Subsidiary
    
    Business
    
    State of
      OrganizationYork Haven
      Power Company
    
    Hydroelectric
      Generation
    
    PennsylvaniaMet-Ed Funding
      LLC
    
    Special-Purpose
      Finance
    
    Delaware
 
 
 
 Note: Met-Ed, along
with its affiliates JCP&L and Penelec, collectively own all of the common
stock of Saxton Nuclear Experimental Corporation, a Pennsylvania non-profit
corporation organized for nuclear experimental purposes which is now inactive.
The carrying value of the owners' investment has been written down to a nominal
value.
 
 Exhibit Number 21,
List of Subsidiaries of the registrant at December 31, 2006, is not included in
the printed document.