alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULES

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Comcast Corporation
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  following  Registration
Statements of Comcast  Corporation and its subsidiaries  (the "Company") on Form
S-3 and S-8 of our report  dated  February  27,  1998,  appearing  in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Comcast  Corporation  and its  subsidiaries  for the year
ended December 31, 1997.


Registration Statements on Form S-8:

                                 

Title of Securities Registered                  Registration Statement Number

The Comcast Corporation Retirement Investment Plan          33-41440

The Comcast Corporation Retirement Investment Plan          33-63223

Storer Communications Retirement Savings Plan               33-54365

Stock Option Plans                                          33-25105

Stock Option Plans                                          33-56903

The 1996 Comcast Corporation Stock Option Plan              333-08577

The 1996 Comcast Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan     333-18715


Registration Statements on Form S-3:

Title of Securities Registered

Senior Debentures; Senior Subordinated Debentures;
Subordinated Debentures; Preferred Stock, without par
value; Depository Shares representing Preferred Stock;
Class A Common Stock, $1.00 par value; Class A Special
Common Stock, $1.00 par value and Warrants                  33-50785

Class A Special Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share    333-06161

Our audits of the financial statements referred to in our aforementioned  report
also included the financial statement  schedules of the Company,  listed in Item
14(b)(i).  These financial  statement  schedules are the  responsibility  of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on our audits.
In our opinion, such financial statement schedules,  when considered in relation
to the  basic  financial  statements  taken as a whole,  present  fairly  in all
material respects the information set forth therein.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
February 27, 1998
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fact Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jacqueline Danforth, President and Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: November 19, 2003 | By: /s/ Jacqueline Danforth
Name: Jacqueline Danforth
Title: President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|----------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of 1 

f\UG 2 0 2010 

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 

PUBLICATION &. REGULATIONS 

PUBLI(jlRANCH 

SUBMISSION 

As of: August 20, 2010 

Received: August 09, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 20, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2cbSe 

Comments Due: August 16, ;WlO 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0183 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: Evelyn Louise Schumacher 

Address: 

2206 Saratoga DR. #4 

Springfield, IL, 62704 

Email: evelyn_schumacher_S54@comcast.net 

Phone: 217-787-6298 

Government Agency Type: Federal 

General Comment 

See attached 

Attachments 

IRS-2010-0010-0183.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

https:1Ifdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency Icomponentlsubmitter InfoCoverPage ?Call=... 8/20/201 0 
August 9,2010 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating 

to Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable 

Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally 

comment on the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status 

(Document ID IRS-2010-0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every 

effort should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient 

Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or 

conditions that would extend these protections to consumers under currently existing 

"grand fathered" plans should not be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically 

support the position and detailed comments offered by the American Chiropractic 

Association with respect to the implementation of these regulations. 

Evelyn L. Schumacher
#### § 375.901 What penalties do we impose for violations of this part?

The penalty provisions of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 149, Civil and Criminal Penalties apply to this part. These penalties do not overlap. Notwithstanding these civil penalties, nothing in this section shall deprive any holder of a receipt or a bill of lading any remedy or right of action under existing law.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000022198
<NAME> COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,867,038
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     25,950
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         196,770
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        66,363
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 438,005
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,594,126
<COMMON>                                        41,026
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      574,427
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             74,320
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 689,773
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           75,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           990,796
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                        7,500
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     22,981
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 4,835
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 803,241
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,594,126
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,071,862
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            58,793
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     827,261
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     886,054
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        185,808
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               5,202
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 191,010
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        80,394
<NET-INCOME>                                   110,616
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     11,907
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   98,709
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        71,900
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       66,811
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         206,579
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1> All common stock owned by parent company; no EPS required.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# Air Forces Central conducts C-UAS exercise with UK, France, and regional partners

/ Published July 22, 2023
AL UDEID AIR BASE, Qatar, 
U.S. Air Forces Central (AFCENT) has successfully concluded a comprehensive Counter-Unmanned Aircraft Systems exercise on July 20, which aimed at enhancing integration, interoperability, and lethality among participating nations. The exercise brought together air forces from the United States, United Kingdom, France, and three other regional air forces, fostering collaboration and strengthening institutional capacity in countering the evolving UAS threat.With the rapid proliferation of UAS technology, it has become imperative for nations to enhance their C-UAS capabilities. The recently concluded exercise served as a crucial platform for AFCENT and its partners to improve their ability to effectively neutralize UAS threats, ensuring the safety and security of their respective airspace.A total of 17 aircraft, including U.S. F-16s, a KC-10, and MQ-9s, participated in the exercise. This diverse fleet represented the cutting-edge capabilities of the participating nations, showcasing their commitment to countering UAS threats through advanced technology and operational expertise."This C-UAS exercise demonstrates our unwavering commitment to enhancing collective defense capabilities across the Middle East region," said U.S. Air Force Brig. Gen. David Mineau, Ninth Air Force (Air Forces Central) deputy commander and Deputy Combined Forces Air Component Commander for U.S. Central Command. "By working closely with our regional and coalition partners, we aim to strengthen our ability to detect, track, and neutralize UAS threats, ultimately ensuring the safety of our partner nations and forces."The exercise focused on various aspects of countering Unmanned Aircraft Systems threats, including detection, tracking, and engagement techniques. Through realistic scenarios and simulated UAS threats, participating forces enhanced their situational awareness, refined their tactics, and developed effective countermeasures.The event provided an opportunity for U.S. Air Forces Central and its partners to share best practices, lessons learned, and operational experiences in countering UAS threats. This exchange of knowledge and expertise will contribute to the continuous improvement of C-UAS capabilities across the coalition, fostering a stronger and more coordinated response to this evolving threat.Air Forces Central remains committed to ensuring the safety and security of the region, and exercises such as this play a vital role in achieving that objective. By strengthening integration, interoperability, and lethality, AFCENT and its partners are better equipped to address the challenges posed by UAS technology, safeguarding the skies and preserving peace in the region.
U.S. Transportation Command’s Top Leader Visits U.S. 5th Fleet
 
  By U.S. Naval Forces Central Command Public Affairs
  U.S. Naval Forces Central Command (NAVCENT) hosted the top leader of U.S. Transportation Command at U.S. 5th Fleet headquarters in Bahrain, Feb. 7, during a trip to the Middle East. U.S. Air Force Gen. Jacqueline D. Van Ovost met with naval leaders including Vice Adm. Brad Cooper, commander of NAVCENT, U.S. 5th Fleet and Combined Maritime Forces. She also met with defense logistics personnel stationed in Bahrain and recognized top performers during an outdoor ceremony. “You can't do anything without logisticians,” Van Ovost told two Sailors and a U.S. Army civilian staff member to whom she presented challenge coins. “The mission can't be done without you. Thank you for doing what you do to support everyone across such a vast region.” Following the ceremony, Van Ovost held a roundtable discussion with representatives from the U.S. Embassy in Bahrain, NAVCENT, Defense Logistics Agency and local Navy and Army logistics commands. Van Ovost also met with members of U.S. 5th Fleet’s unmanned systems and artificial intelligence task force, Task Force 59. The unit’s staff briefed her on new initiatives during a tour of the Robotics Operations Center. “It’s incredible to see the expansion of innovation and I’m looking forward to strengthening our collaboration,” said Van Ovost. U.S. Transportation Command is one of 11 U.S. combatant commands. Headquartered in Illinois, the command ensures U.S. military mobility platforms and units are postured to meet global missions, including coordinating access, basing and overflight authorizations with partners in the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility. NAVCENT forces operate across the Middle East region, including in the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, Red Sea, parts of the Indian Ocean and three critical choke points at the Strait of Hormuz, Suez Canal and Bab al-Mandeb.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/18/15 10:06 PM

Received: July 15, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jzu-zclb

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2312

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I can handle my own retirement!, keep your grubby hands away from it!. It's my life, not your's.
----

COUNCIL DECISION

of 29 April 2004

appointing the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia

(2004/C 116/03)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to the Acts concerning the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic to the European Union (1), and in particular Article 52 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2003/C218/01 of 22 July 2003 on the setting up of an Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work, and in particular Article 3 thereof,

Having regard to the list of candidates submitted to the Council by the Governments of the abovementioned States,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The following are hereby appointed members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for the period from 1 May 2004 to 31 December 2006:

I.   GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES

II.   TRADE UNION REPRESENTATIVES

III.   EMPLOYERS' REPRESENTATIVES

Done at Luxembourg, 29 April 2004.

For the Council

The President

M. McDOWELL

----

(1)OJ L 236, 23.9.2003.

(2)OJ C 321, 31.12.2003, p. 17.

----
From: Chris McCommon [mailto:Chris@dbsouth.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 9:32 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

You already FORCE us to participate in the Social Security Ponzi scheme. If you force us to do 

the same with our OWN 401K’s and other savings I can promise a full on tax revolt in this 

country! 

Keep your wealth redistribution plans to yourself! 

I work hard for my money and I don’t want it given to the lazy fat portion of our population. 

Thank You, 

Chris McCommon 

DB South 

404-723-9403 cell 

770-795-1414
Page 1 of 1

—) hn 7) 5
LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION. PEOMIS4/A 10 AUG f>N"9
EG .
PUBLICATION CH [As of: August 06, 2010

Received: August 05, 2010
Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: August 06, 2010

Tracking No, 80b29af8
Comments Due: September 15, 2010
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0002
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Status as Grandfathered Health Plan under
the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Cross-Reference

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0034
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14487

SE.

Submitter Information

Name: Rachelle A Maddaloni
Address:
Mechanicsburg,
Organization: American Insurance Administrators, Inc.

General Comment

Please provide clarification/definition of integrated vs standalone HRA plan needs to be provided.
An integrated plan works seamlessly with the insurance carrier to pay HRA eligible benefits. A
standalone plan requires individuals to submit claims for reimbusement.

Does an integrated HRA plan have to seamlessly (without submission of claims by the insured)
coordinate benefits with the health plan?

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/ContentV iewer?objectlId=0900006480b29af... 8/6/2010
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

EXHIBIT 10.16    
    


[NUVASIVE, INC. LETTERHEAD]


<<DATE>> 


<PR_GIVEN_NAME>
<PR_SURNAME>

<PR_STREET_ADDRESS>

<PR_LOCALITY>, <PR_STATE_OR_PROVINCE> <PR_POSTAL_CODE> 





	Re:
	 Grant of [Incentive][Nonstatutory] Stock Option  









	Option Shares:	 	 	 	Grant Date:	 	 
	 	 	
	 	 	 	

	Price per share:	 	 	 	Vesting Base Date:	 	 
	 	 	
	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	Fully-Vested Date:	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	Option control no.:	 	 	 	Expiration Date:	 	 
	 	 	
	 	 	 	







Dear
<PR_GIVEN_NAME>: 


        I
am pleased to confirm that the Company has granted you an option to purchase shares of our common stock under the NuVasive, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Plan. To accept your stock
option, please sign the enclosed copy of this letter and return it to {department name, mail-stop}{in the envelope provided}. 


General terms  


        Your option is intended to be [an incentive][a nonstatutory] option. The basic terms of your option grant are
identified in the information block at the top of this offer letter, but other important terms and conditions are described in the plan. We encourage you to carefully review the plan, a copy of which
is [enclosed] [available on request from our {Stock Administrator}{Human Resources Department}][and on the intranet at
                        ]. 


Purchase and payment  


        Subject to the plan, your option vests (becomes exercisable) in equal installments of twenty-five percent (25%) of the Option Shares on and after each
of the first four anniversaries of the date hereof, calculated to the closest whole share, so that all shares will become purchasable on the Fully-Vested Date shown above. 


        If
you decide to purchase shares under this option, you will be required to submit a completed exercise agreement on a form approved by the Company, together with payment for the shares.
You may pay for the shares (plus any associated withholding taxes) using cash, a check, a wire transfer or any other form of payment listed in section 6.4(c) of the plan and permitted by the
Administrator at the time you wish to exercise. Shares available under this option must be purchased, if at all, no later than the Expiration Date. 



[Specify any other special provisions.] 


We
value your efforts and look forward to your continued contribution. 


Sincerely,



[CEO
name]

[CEO title] 


I accept this option and agree to the terms of this offer letter and the plan.  



	    
 Optionee signature	 	    
 Date	, 200	    












QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 10.16
Comments regarding Regulatory Guidance CMS-4140-NC

I am a clinical and research psychologist who provides EEG biofeedback treatment to 

individuals with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Mood Disorders, and 

Insomnia. EEG biofeedback is an empirically validated and widely recognized, effective, 

non-invasive, non medication treatment for ADHD, as well as many other conditions. . 

There are close to 100 studies demonstrating the effectiveness of EEG biofeedback in the 

treatment of ADHD, Substance Use disorders, Autism, Insomnia, and numerous other 

disorders. A recent review of this literature concluded “EEG biofeedback meets the 

American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry criteria for” Clinical Guidelines 

“for treatment of ADHD.” This means that EEG biofeedback meets the same criteria as 

to medication for treating ADHD, and that EEG biofeedback “should always be 

considered as an intervention for this disorder by the clinician”.

This service has been denied by Georgia Medicaid, Aetna, United Behavioral 

Health, Blue Cross, Cigna, and Amerigroup.

This is limitation of an effective and validated treatment for a mental health 

problem. The reasons given by the insurance companies for this denial fell into two 

categories: 1) our company does not cover biofeedback for Mental Health problems or 2) 

there is not yet sufficient evidence for the efficacy of EEG biofeedback. As such, they 

are using evidence-based criteria that are far more restrictive for mental health services 

than the criteria which are used for medical/surgical services. There are many routine 

medical and surgical procedures which have far fewer controlled studies about their 

efficacy than does EEG biofeedback. These medical and surgical procedures are 

generally not limited because of concerns about how many controlled studies have been 

performed about them. 

 Parity regulations, based on legal reviews of the parity statue, should require that 

employers and plans pay for the same range and scope of services for Behavioral 

Treatments as they do for Med Surg benefits and that a plan cannot be more restrictive in 

their managed care criteria and reviews for Mental Health and Substance Abuse disorders 

when compared to Med Surg. Today these plans are operating in more restrictive 

procedures for how they review evidenced based Mental Health and Substance Abuse 

Treatments when compared to Med Surg treatments. This violates both the intent and 

letter of the parity statute and we hope that the regulations will clarify that this violation 

of freedom of choice cannot continue. 

Barbara U. Hammer, Ph.D. 

www.brainpowerfitness.com

www.Helfgott.org

7474 SW Ashford St. 

Tigard, OR 97224 

503 336-0553 

949 842-6656