alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULES

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Comcast Corporation
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  following  Registration
Statements of Comcast  Corporation and its subsidiaries  (the "Company") on Form
S-3 and S-8 of our report  dated  February  22,  1999,  appearing  in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Comcast  Corporation  and its  subsidiaries  for the year
ended December 31, 1998.


Registration Statements on Form S-8:

                                 

Title of Securities Registered                  Registration Statement Number

The Comcast Corporation Retirement Investment Plan          33-41440

The Comcast Corporation Retirement Investment Plan          33-63223

Storer Communications Retirement Savings Plan               33-54365

Stock Option Plans                                          33-56903

The 1996 Comcast Corporation Stock Option Plan              333-08577

The 1996 Comcast Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan     333-18715

Comcast-Spectacor 401(k) Plan                               333-69709


Registration Statements on Form S-3:

Title of Security Registered

Senior Debentures; Senior Subordinated Debentures;
Subordinated Debentures; Preferred Stock, without par
value; Depository Shares representing Preferred Stock;
Class A Common Stock, $1.00 par value; Class A Special
Common Stock, $1.00 par value and Warrants                  33-50785

Our audits of the financial statements referred to in our aforementioned  report
also included the financial statement  schedules of the Company,  listed in Item
14(b)(i).  These financial  statement  schedules are the  responsibility  of the
Company's  management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion,  such financial statement schedules,  when considered in
relation to the basic financial  statements taken as a whole,  present fairly in
all material respects the information set forth therein.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
February 22, 1999
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
# U.S. Military Conducts Airstrikes Against ISIL in Iraq and Syria

/ Published Sept. 30, 2014

**TAMPA, Fla., Sept. 23, 2014** - U.S. military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Iraq and Syria, using a mix of bomber and remotely piloted aircraft to conduct three airstrikes last night and today.

Two of the airstrikes were conducted last night as part of the operation over Syria and resulted in one damaged ISIL armed vehicle and one destroyed ISIL armed vehicle southwest of Dayr Az Zawr. In addition, a third airstrike in Iraq today destroyed one ISIL armed vehicle northwest of Baghdad. All aircraft exited the strike areas safely.

The strikes were conducted as part of the President's comprehensive strategy to degrade and destroy ISIL.

To date, U.S. Central Command has conducted 194 airstrikes across Iraq against ISIL. Along with partner nations, U.S. Central Command has also conducted 16 airstrikes across Syria against ISIL.
##### 



Exhibit 10.4
 WEBMETHODS, INC.
2006 OMNIBUS STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT
  Grant
 Vesting Generally
 Vesting Following Change of Control provided however




---



##### 



Stock Certificates and Restrictions
   Corporate Event
 Taxation
 - 2 -




---



##### 



Section 83(b) Election
 Withholding Taxes
 Construction of Employee
 Entire Agreement; Amendment provided however
 Terms and Conditions of Plan
 - 3 -




---



##### 



Choice of Law
 Successors and Assigns
 Employment of Employee
 Invalid or Unenforceable Provisions
 Notices
 Further Assurances
 Headings
  - 4 -




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 WEBMETHODS, INC.By:
    
    /s/ David MitchellName:
    
    David MitchellTitle:
    
    President & CEOEMPLOYEE/s/ Kenneth A. Sexton
 - 5 -
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                       REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors and Stockholder of
El Paso CGP Company:

     In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements in the Index
appearing under Item 14(a)(1) present fairly, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position of El Paso CGP Company as of December 31, 2001,
and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the year
then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement
schedule for the year ended December 31, 2001 listed in the index under Item
14(a)(2) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth
therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial
statements. These financial statements and the financial statement schedule are
the responsibility of the Company's management; our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements and the financial statement schedule
based on our audit. We conducted our audit of these statements in accordance
with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America,
which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

     As discussed in Notes 1 and 8, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, on January 1, 2001.

     As discussed in Note 14, the Company changed its actuarial measurement date
for measuring pension and other postretirement benefit obligations from December
31 to September 30.

     We also audited the adjustments described in Note 15 that were applied to
restate the disclosures of 2000 and 1999 segment information in the accompanying
financial statements to give retroactive effect to the change in reportable
segments. In our opinion, such adjustments are appropriate and have been
properly applied to the prior period financial statements.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas
March 6, 2002
From: Philip G. Fairbanks 

Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2017 2:41 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: 1210-AB39 comment

Dear Deputy Assistant Secretary Hauser: 

I am an attorney, and a good portion of my practice involves representing claimants under long-term 

disability, life, accidental death, and health benefits governed by ERISA. I am writing to offer support for 

the implementation of the new disability regulations and to ask that you not delay their effective date. I 

do not believe these regulations will increase costs, and in any event, all interested parties have already 

had an opportunity to comment on the regulations and costs during the rule-making process.

I would like to comment specifically on a few provisions of the regulations.

I believe requiring insurers and/or plans to explain why their claim decisions differ from the disability 

determinations made by the Social Security Administration is a good idea. Many insurers do this 

already, and I am unaware how this could possibly increase costs for the insurers. In fact, it would 

seemingly decrease costs. For example, I have litigated cases where this very issue has arisen, only for 

the Court to eventually remand the claim back to the insurer. If insurers simply address this issue, costly 

litigation perhaps could be avoided. 

Giving claimants an opportunity to respond to evidence generated by insurers during the claim process 

is also a good idea. Often, insurers will create new evidence after an appeal has been submitted, and 

this concerns a lack of due process and fairness to claimants. I do not believe this will increase costs 

because it gives claimants the option to respond, and I do not believe that it will result in an endless 

back-and-forth.

The deemed exhaustion requirement in the regulations is helpful. I have practiced cases where insurers 

fail to render decisions on claims, although many claims are decided within the timeframes set by the 

current regulations. Any effort to erode these timeframes, in my view, will add uncertainty and costs of 

litigation.

Finally, requiring insurers and plans to advise claimants when a potential contractual limitations period 

may run will promote certainty and fairness. This is a minimal requirement, and given the fact that the 

ERISA benefits process is supposed to be in the best interest of the beneficiaries, this would seem to be 

a logical regulation. 

Thank you for your consideration.

Philip G. Fairbanks

pgf@austinmehr.com

This electronic mail transmission from Mehr Fairbanks & Peterson Trial Lawyers may constitute an 
attorney-client communication that is privileged at law. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, 

any unauthorized persons. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it 

from your system without copying it, and notify the sender by reply e-mail, so that our address record can 

be corrected.
From: Theresa Ryan [mailto:theresar@mannlakeltd.com] 

Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 9:34 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule

Mr. Fred J. Wong 

Employee Benefits Security Administration 

U.S. Department of Labor 

Office of Regulations and Interpretations Room N-5655 

200 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20210 

Dear Mr. Wong: 

We respectfully request that you modify the DOL proposed regulations to remove the requirement 

that persons providing ESOP appraisals and fairness opinions are fiduciaries. On behalf of the 

participants of our ESOP and Mann Lake Ltd., we feel the proposed regulations would adversely 

impact our well being. 

If you do not find that current regulations provide sufficient remedies, working with the ESOP 

professional community to create professional standards and enforcement procedures and 

providing the community with clear guidance are two solutions that would effectively address your 

concerns. 

Thank you.

 

Theresa Ryan, CFO 

Mann Lake Ltd. 

501 1st St. S. 

Hackensack, MN 56452-2589 

phone (218) 675-6688 

fax (218) 675-7436 

theresar@mannlakeltd.com
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

Received: January 06, 2016

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1k0-8n8h-fh6x

Comments Due: January 19, 2016

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2015-0017

Claims Procedure for Plans Providing Disability Benefits

Comment On: EBSA-2015-0017-0001

Claims Procedure for Plans Providing Disability Benefits

Document: EBSA-2015-0017-DRAFT-0016

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-29295

Submitter Information

Name: 

General Comment

Re: RIN-1210-AB39

Please adopt the proposed changes to the ERISA disability law. Current guidelines are stacked 

against the disabled and need to be changed. They cause unbelievable hardship on people at the 

worst time of their lives. Most egregious to me is the bonus paid to insurance company 

employees for denying claims. While there are a few people who try to play the system, the vast 

majority of disabled people would much prefer to be working and be productive again. I know 

because I am disabled and would give anything to be able to work.
H. Res. 56

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 3, 2001.

Whereas the annual meeting of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights in Geneva, Switzerland, provides

a forum for discussing human rights and expressing

international support for improved human rights performance;

Whereas, according to the Department of State and international human rights organizations, the Government of

the People’s Republic of China continues to commit widespread and well-documented human rights abuses in

China and Tibet;

Whereas the People’s Republic of China has yet to demonstrate its willingness to abide by internationally accepted norms of freedom of belief, expression, and association

by repealing or amending laws and decrees that restrict

those freedoms;

Whereas the Government of the People’s Republic of China

continues to ban and criminalize groups it labels as cults

or heretical organizations;

Whereas the Government of the People’s Republic of China

has repressed unregistered religious congregations and

spiritual movements, including Falun Gong, and persists

in persecuting persons on the basis of unauthorized reli-
2

•HRES 56 EH

gious activities using such measures as harassment, prolonged detention, physical abuse, incarceration, and closure or destruction of places of worship;

Whereas authorities in the People’s Republic of China have

continued their efforts to extinguish expressions of protest or criticism, have detained scores of citizens associated with attempts to organize a peaceful opposition, to

expose corruption, to preserve their ethnic minority identity, or to use the Internet for the free exchange of ideas,

and have sentenced many citizens so detained to harsh

prison terms;

Whereas Chinese authorities continue to exert control over religious and cultural institutions in Tibet, abusing human

rights through instances of torture, arbitrary arrest, and

detention of Tibetans without public trial for peacefully

expressing their political or religious views;

Whereas bilateral human rights dialogues between several nations and the People’s Republic of China have yet to

produce substantial adherence to international norms;

and

Whereas the People’s Republic of China has signed the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, but has

yet to take the steps necessary to make the treaty legally

binding: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) strongly supports the decision of the United

States Government to offer and solicit cosponsorship for

a resolution at the 57th Session of the United Nations

Human Rights Commission in Geneva, Switzerland, calling upon the Government of the People’s Republic of
3

•HRES 56 EH

China to end its human rights abuses in China and

Tibet, in compliance with its international obligations;

and

(2) urges the United States Government to take the

lead in organizing multilateral support to obtain passage

by the Commission of such resolution.

Attest:

Clerk.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsUnified Aeroacoustics Analysis for High Speed Turboprop Aerodynamics and NoiseA unified theory for the aerodynamics and noise of advanced turboprops are presented. Aerodynamic topics include calculation of performance, blade load distribution, and non-uniform wake flow fields. Blade loading can be steady or unsteady due to fixed distortion, counter-rotating wakes, or blade vibration. The aerodynamic theory is based on the pressure potential method and is therefore basically linear. However, nonlinear effects associated with finite axial induction and blade vortex flow are included via approximate methods. Acoustic topics include radiation of noise caused by blade thickness, steady loading (including vortex lift), and unsteady loading. Shielding of the fuselage by its boundary layer and the wing are treated in separate analyses that are compatible but not integrated with the aeroacoustic theory for rotating blades.Document ID19910009736Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsHanson, D. B.*(Hamilton Standard Windsor Locks, CT, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1991Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberE-6021NAS 1.26:4329NASA-CR-4329Accession Number91N19049Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-62-4DCONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-23720Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910009736.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.36 MB)
 
 Reconnaissance Lessons Learned 1st cavalry division arcent 3rd armored brigade combat team 3rd abct u.s. army central 1st Cav. Div 6th Squadron hunter-killer 9th Cavalry Regiment 6-9 CAV Saber Squadron M1A2 Abrams Main Battle Tank M2A3 Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle Central Command Centcom
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 545 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 25, 2002.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 1646) to authorize 
appropriations for the Department of State for fiscal years 2002 and 2003, and 
for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and 
against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered 
as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0001034755
<NAME>                        Brigham Exploration Company


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                  73
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        6,808
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     7,308
<PP&E>                                             121,807
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     132,658
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               10,706
<BONDS>                                            109,437
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               167
<OTHER-SE>                                           6,825
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       132,658
<SALES>                                              9,140
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     9,189
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        6,975
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     2,990
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   5,750
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (6,526)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (6,526)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (6,526)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.41)



</TABLE>
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.68 MB)
 
 ASC 17 AFA_CRUSHISIS
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil