alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Stephen A. Gorgol, Chief Financial Officer of Vista MedicalTechnologies, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(a)                                  theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter endedSeptember 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)                                 theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  November 13, 2003

 
| /s/  STEPHEN A. GORGOL |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
| Stephen A. Gorgol           |
| Chief Financial Officer     |

 

----
NO. 07-01-0280-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL C

	AUGUST 1, 2001

	______________________________

	J.Y. JR. (J.T.) McADAMS AND ANNIE McADAMS,

			Appellant

	v.

	IMA McADAMS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX OF THE 

	ESTATE OF J.Y. McADAMS, DECEASED AND 

	BARBARA MCADAMS BILLUPS, 

			Appellees

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 69TH DISTRICT COURT OF MOORE COUNTY;

	NO. 3739H; HON. RON ENNS, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

	Order on Notice to Withdraw Notice of Appeal

	________________________________

Before QUINN, REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

	Before this court pends the motion by J.Y. Jr. (J.T.) McAdams (McAdams) to withdraw his notice of appeal, which notice was filed on July 11, 2001.  He so moved because he believed the notice was premature, but expressly reserves the opportunity to file another notice within the time permitted by law.1   Construing the notice as a motion to dismiss without prejudice, we grant same.  Accordingly, it is ordered that the appeal be dismissed without prejudice to anyone filing a later, timely notice of appeal.  Having dismissed the appeal at the personal request of McAdams, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and mandate shall issue forthwith. 

                                         				Per Curiam. 

Do not publish.
# New enlistees answer the call to serve

/ Published Nov. 13, 2018
Tampa, Fla., 
On November 11th, Veterans Day, more than 130 future service members marched onto the field at halftime to take the Oath of Enlistment in front of thousands of football fans during the Tampa Bay Buccaneers home game against the Washington Redskins at Raymond James Stadium.

                U.S. Army Gen. Joseph Votel, commander, U.S. Central Command, administers the Oath of Enlistment to approximately 130 future service members during a ceremony at Raymond James Stadium, Nov. 11th, 2018. The enlistees were provided a unique opportunity to take the Oath of Enlistment in front of thousands of football fans, during halftime of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers home game versus the Washington Redskins. (U.S. Central Command Public Affairs photo by Tom Gagnier)                            New enlistees answer the call to serve                            U.S. Army Gen. Joseph Votel, commander, U.S. Central Command, administers the Oath of Enlistment to approximately 130 future service members during a ceremony at Raymond James Stadium, Nov. 11th, 2018. The enlistees were provided a unique opportunity to take the Oath of Enlistment in front of thousands of football fans, during halftime of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers home game versus the Washington Redskins. (U.S. Central Command Public Affairs photo by Tom Gagnier)            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Tom GagnierVIRIN: 181111-D-VG904-018U.S. Central Command, commander, Joseph Votel administered the oath to the enlistees who represented the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, and Coast Guard. 

"It's an honor to participate in this ceremony with these brave young men and women as they take an oath for the first time to support and defend our nation," said Votel. "America should be extremely proud of their commitment and patriotism. I hope their service is as rewarding and meaningful as mine has been to me."

The Oath of Enlistment ceremony was part of a military appreciation game hosted by the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.

“The Salute to Service game is the highlight of our home schedule every season,” said Buccaneers Chief Operating Officer Brian Ford. “We are extremely proud of the strong bond we have forged with MacDill Air Force Base, as well as all branches of the military, here in the Tampa Bay area. It is an honor and a privilege to host the oath of enlistment ceremony here at Raymond James Stadium as we celebrate the selfless service of all the men and women in our military.”

Among the new airmen who recited the Oath of Enlistment was Veronica Sallisky of Mulberry, Florida. “I truly believe that America is the greatest country on the Earth, and to be able to promise to defend and protect the flag with everyone standing in the stadium is a feeling that you can’t put into words,” said Sallisky.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**Certification
      of Periodic Report by the Principal Accounting Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**


**As
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002**





Pursuant
      to, and for purposes only of, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned hereby certifies
      that (i) the Quarterly Report of Shore Bancshares, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
      quarter ended September 30, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) information contained
      in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of Shore Bancshares, Inc.





Date:
                November 6, 2008
            /s/
                Susan E. LeavertonSusan
                E. Leaverton, CPATreasurer/Principal
                Accounting Officer
#### CHARLES ORTH, PROSECUTOR, v. CITY OF HACKENSACK, RESPONDENT.

Argued May 3, 1933

Decided September 15, 1933.

Before Justices Case, Bodine and Donges.

For the prosecutor, *James De Turch.*

For the respondent, *Walter G. Winne.*

Per Curiam.

This is an application for a writ of *certiorari*to review an item in the 1933 budget of the city of Hackensack. The *768prosecutor is a member of the Hackensack Improvement Commission, the governing body of the municipality.

The item under attack is “reserve against uncollected taxes $200,400.” The first ground is that this item violates that section of the Budget act which provides that the amount to be raised shall be stated, the appropriations itemized and the several items set forth accurately according to the respective and particular objects, departments or sub-departments for which the respective amounts are to be expended. Reliance is had upon *Mackey*v. Belvidere, 101 *N. J. L.*250; 128 *Atl. Rep.*859, where the appropriation held invalid was “preservation of life and property $12,150.” In that.case Mr. Justice Trenchard held that the item in the budget gave the taxpayers no information as to how the money was to be spent and that there was nothing in the return to the writ which clarified it. In the instant case there seems little doubt of the purpose of the item.

Hnless the merits of the application are clear, the court ought not exercise the prerogative writ of *certiorari*to throw confusion into the financial affairs of the city. *Hourigan*v. *North*Bergen, 11 *N. J. Mis. R.*194; 165 *Atl. Rep.*74. We conclude the rights of the prosecutor are not clear in this case.

The rule to show cause is discharged.
From: Bob [mailto:hillhi@usa.net] 

Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 6:48 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Cc: singletarym@washpost.com

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

I stand w/ Sec. Perez--to make financial advisers accountable to their clients--

I have no idea about the actual costs for different products--each adviser knocks the other 

guys & their advice. 

BOB GOOD
#### § 585.62 Purpose.

The purpose of these reporting requirements is to assist the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in determining whether a manufacturer has complied with Standard No. 138.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFree wake analysis of hover performance using a new influence coefficient methodA new approach to the prediction of helicopter rotor performance using a free wake analysis was developed. This new method uses a relaxation process that does not suffer from the convergence problems associated with previous time marching simulations. This wake relaxation procedure was coupled to a vortex-lattice, lifting surface loads analysis to produce a novel, self contained performance prediction code: EHPIC (Evaluation of Helicopter Performance using Influence Coefficients). The major technical features of the EHPIC code are described and a substantial amount of background information on the capabilities and proper operation of the code is supplied. Sample problems were undertaken to demonstrate the robustness and flexibility of the basic approach. Also, a performance correlation study was carried out to establish the breadth of applicability of the code, with very favorable results.Document ID19910009737Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsQuackenbush, Todd R.*(Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Princeton, NJ, United States)*Bliss, Donald B.*(Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Princeton, NJ, United States)*Ong, Ching Cho*(Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Princeton, NJ, United States)*Ching, Cho Ong*(Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Princeton, NJ, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1990Publication InformationPublisher: NASASubject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-4309NAS 1.26:4309A-90091Accession Number91N19050Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-61-51CONTRACT_GRANT: SBIR-03.07-9282CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS2-12148Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910009737.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
[INSERT DATE] 


Office ofConsumer Information and Insurance Oversight 


Department of Health and Human Services 
 ~.J''

Attention: OCIIO-999I-IFC 

P:O. Box 8016 


Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 


Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 


Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 


Below are my comments regarding the Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health 

L - - ._" • fn'Sttra:r'l:ee-&t",el'ftge-R"Clating4~~as--a-Gnmdfath€r-ed-llGaJth-:LT21~n~r~th0-l!at.ie.nl'=t"",~~. """.=:....-"-'--=--.....;..__..•~ 

Protection and Affordable Care Act (PP ACA). 

I believe that every effort should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by 

PPACA, especially as of January 1,2014 when most ofthe reform components (Insurance 

Exchanges, Subsidies, Tax Credits, etc.) come into play. 

The average consumer has a broad definition of "benefits." Consumers view their health plan 

beyond the covered benefits, cost sharing, and the contribution levels associated with the plan. if.,.,..S 

It is my opinion that the Rule may still result in some confusion to the marketplace in its 

application. For example, if an employer raised the copayment level beyond the maximum in one 

area (i.e. outpatient services) but retained the copayment level for pri!llary care doctor visits, 

does that mean a loss of grandfather status? Clarity will be critical both for the employer and the 

employee. 

Even by the most optimistic estimates, a substantial portion ofthe employee population will 

remain outside the PPACA as ofJanuary 2014 based on the current rules. While I understand the 

difficulty involved in making change, creating another large sub-population of excluded 

individuals will only add to costs, increase confusion, and mitigate the potential impact ofthe 

legislation. 

The Rule needs to be clear, reasonable, and with no ambiguities involved in determining whether 

a group health plan is "in or out." The decisions the federal government makes today will 

determine the outcomes for tomorrow. We may need to make some difficult decisions to create 

a sustainable health care system that will support a growing economy in the future. That means 

getting as many citizens across the country participating at the beginning to make it work and 

delivering on its promises to retain their support. 

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this regulation. 

[INSERT NAME]
Page 1 of 2

EGAL ths USING DVIS ONS | |
rca fECHEUAL ALE 2 8 2019

As of: August 20, 2010

PUBLIC Status Poste

Posted: August 20, 2010
SUBMISSION Comments Duet August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0301
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Billy Ray Barnett
Address:
321 Gemini Cir
Birmingham, AL,

General Comment

9 Aug 2010

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O, Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status
as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

AS a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations, The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these

http://fdms.erulemaking .net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/20/2010


Page 2 of 2

regulations.

Billy R. Barnett

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/20/2010
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.22 MB)
 
 1/7 Coalition forces 7TH MARINES cjtf-oir A&A Middle East Al Asad air base building partner capacity spmagtfcrcc Combined Joint Task Force-Operation Inherent Resolve Advise and assist Special Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force-Crisis Response-Central Command Al Anbar province USCENTCOM Iraq 1st Battalion Deployed Security Forces MARINE CORPS MARINES deployment
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
, 

Advance Chiropractic Clinic 


Kevin K. Gruhot, D.C., D.A.B.C.O., C.C.S.P., C.S.C.S. 2840 19th Ave S 

J,ohn T. Fulp, D.C. Grand Forks, NO 58201 

Phone: (701) 772-2670 

Fax: (701)772-2706 

08110110 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 


Department ofHealth and Human Services 


Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 


P.O. Box 8016 


Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 


Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status as a 

;=--'---~~~~"Gl'andfathered~Health'Plan,ynder t.fte~Patient,Proteet.ffin=and Aff-er.aable-Gar-e~Gt~~~~,~-,,-.:....'-"-.­

Below are my comments regarding the Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance 

Coverage Relating to Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable 

Care Act (PPACA). 

I believe that every effort should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by PP ACA, 

especially as of January 1,2014 when most of the reform components (Insurance Exchanges, Subsidies, 

Tax Credits, etc.) come into play. 

The average consumer has a broad definition of "benefits." Consumers view their health plan beyond the 

c<;nr:ered benefits, ,eo.st sharing, and the contribution levels associated with the plan. 

It is my opinion that the Rule may still result in some confusion to the marketplace in its application. For 

example, if an employer raised the copayment level beyond the maximum in one area (i.e. outpatient 

services) but retained the copayment level for primary care doctor visits, does that mean a loss of 

grandfather status? Clarity will be critical both for the employer and the employee. 

Even by the most optimistic estimates, a substantial portion of the employee population will remain 

outside the PPACA as of January 2014 based on the current rules. While I understand the difficulty 

involved in making change, creating another large sub-population of excluded individuals will only add to 

costs, increase confusion, and mitigate the potential impact ofthe legislation. 

The Rule needs to be clear, reasonable, and with no ambiguities involved in determining whether a group 

health plan is "in or ,out." The decisions the federal government makes today will determine the 

outcomes for tomorrow. We may need to make some difficult decisions to create a sustainable health 

care system that will support a growing economy in the future. That means getting as many citizens 

across the country participating at the beginning to make it work and delivering on its promises to retain 

their support. 

Thank you fQr the opportunjty to comment on this regulation . 

.... ,;.. , .. ...i ' : • ,I.

;DI'. Kevin'K gruhot,'.. '. -:. . .;.... to"~ """'.,,- ... ­
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

Received: October 25, 2017

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1k1-8zfe-n5hj

Comments Due: December 11, 2017

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2015-0017

Claims Procedure for Plans Providing Disability Benefits; Extension of Applicability 

Date

Comment On: EBSA-2015-0017-0291

Claims Procedure: Plans Providing Disability Benefits

Document: EBSA-2015-0017-DRAFT-0394

Comment on FR Doc # 2017-22082

Submitter Information

Name: Thomas Hoff

General Comment

I think this is a good idea to get more information on the costs and affects that this 

proposed rule will have on disabled people. I do not want a rule to be published that 

does not have all of the details figured out. I hope that the costs disabled people have 

to pay will not be increased too dramatically if possible
1210-AB32-2-1432.html[7/26/2015 5:04:33 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwc-6eaz

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1928

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Julius Anonymous

General Comment

Keep the government out of my business. I can plan for my own retirement. I want to choose for myself how to

 invest and spend my money.