alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 309 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     December 11, 2001.
Whereas the Capitol is an important symbol of freedom and democracy across the 
        United States and throughout the world, and those who safeguard the 
        Capitol safeguard that freedom and democracy;
Whereas millions of people visit the Capitol each year to observe and learn the 
        workings of the democratic process;
Whereas the United States Capitol Police force was created by Congress in 1828 
        to provide security for the Capitol;
Whereas today the United States Capitol Police provide protection and support 
        services throughout an array of congressional buildings, parks, and 
        thoroughfares;
Whereas the United States Capitol Police provide security for Members of 
        Congress, their staffs, other government employees, and many others who 
        live near, work on, and visit Capitol Hill;
Whereas the United States Capitol Police have successfully managed and 
        coordinated major demonstrations, joint sessions of Congress, State of 
        the Union Addresses, State funerals, and inaugurations;
Whereas the United States Capitol Police have bravely faced numerous 
        emergencies, including three bombings and two shootings, one of which, 
        in 1998, tragically took the lives of Private First Class Jacob ``J.J.'' 
        Chestnut and Detective John Michael Gibson;
Whereas the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, have created a uniquely 
        difficult environment for the United States Capitol Police;
Whereas the United States Capitol Police responded to this challenge quickly and 
        courageously, including by facilitating the evacuation of all of the 
        buildings under their purview, as well as the perimeter thereof; and
Whereas the United States Capitol Police have instituted longer shifts, 
        requiring that officers work substantial overtime each week to ensure 
        the continued protection of the Capitol: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors and thanks the United 
States Capitol Police for their outstanding work and dedication during a period 
of heightened security that began on September 11, 2001.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
From: Dale Jones [mailto:chynwy@msn.com] 

Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 4:46 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Comment to RIN1210-AB33-Request for Comment to a government annuity if we give 

you our IRA and 401K money

Dear Sir,

Here is my comment to your Request for comment to the government taking our IRA and 401K 

money in promise for a future annuity under IRS Document 2010-02028

I do not support this initiative. I have worked long and hard for the money I have in my IRA. The 

US Government has a history of mismanaging programs like Medicare and Social Security. I do 

not believe this initiative will receive any better management. This appears to be another inept 

grab for money to support reckless spending that seems to have no end, no control, and no 

vision for bringing spending under control.

Simply put: Keep you hands off my money that put in my IRA. I planned and saved to ensure I 

have enough money to enjoy my retirement the way I want to not the way the Government 

believes I should. As a group you (the Government) are poor money managers. I know my 

needs and I know what I want to do with my money. I don’t need your help and I don’t support 

you taking my IRA funds for your purposes.

Respectfully submitted by a taxpayer who is appalled at the idea the Government thinks it can 

manage my retirement better than I can.

Dale Jones

10477 Vaughn Street

Commerce City, CO 80022
# Explosion Kills Four in Manbij

/ Published Jan. 16, 2019

January 16, 2019

Release Number 20190116-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla. -** Two U.S. servicemembers, one Department of Defense (DoD) civilian and one contractor supporting DoD were killed and three servicemembers were injured while conducting a local engagement in Manbij, Syria, Jan. 16, 2019.

Initial reports indicate an explosion caused the casualties, and the incident is under investigation.

In accordance with U.S. Department of Defense policy, the names of the servicemembers are being withheld until 24 hours after notification of next of kin is complete.

-30-

Arabic Version

Russian Version
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the annual  report of Arizona Land Income  Corporation
(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2002, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Thomas R. Hislop, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
to the best of my  knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                        /s/ Thomas R. Hislop
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Thomas R. Hislop
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        Arizona Land Income Corporation
                                        March 28, 2003
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-279

Lower Tribunal No. CF18-007258-XX

_____________________________

COREY WESLEY JONES,

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County.

Michael P. McDaniel, Judge.

June 4, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WHITE, MIZE and GANNAM, JJ., concur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard P. Albertine, Jr., 

Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Corey Wesley Jones, Wewahitchka, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. 

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
§ 586.9 Deemed approved registrations. ( a ) If NHTSA does not act on a registration within 90 days of NHTSA's receipt of the submission, NHTSA will notify a registrant by email on or after the 90th day that the registration has been deemed approved. Registrants that have been deemed approved will be included on NHTSA's list of approved replica motor vehicle manufacturers.
( b ) A manufacturer that has not received an email notification from NHTSA about NHTSA's decision on the application following 90 days from submission of the registration should contact NHTSA's Manufacturers Helpdesk to determine the status of its registration (Email: *manufacturerinfo@dot.gov ;* Telephone: 1-888-399-3277). Manufacturers may also contact the helpdesk for information about the status of their registrations at any time, or may themselves check the status using the key provided them when they submitted their registration application. A manufacturer that has not received an email confirmation from NHTSA that its registration has been deemed approved may be subject to enforcement action by NHTSA for violating 49 U.S.C. 30112(a) if NHTSA finds that the registration was incomplete or denied, and that an email notification had been sent to the email address provided in the manufacturer's submission.
( c ) If NHTSA determines that a registration that had been deemed approved is incomplete or fails to meet the requirements for registrants in this part 586, NHTSA may request additional information from the registrant in writing, which includes by email. A manufacturer shall have 60 days to respond to a request for additional information. If the manufacturer fails to respond within the 60 days or submits information that does not support that it meets the requirements of this part 586, NHTSA may revoke the registration.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Rosemary Margenau

Appellate case number: 01

- 15

- 00776

- CV

Trial court case number: 2015

- 04673J

Trial court: 314th District Court of Harris County

On Se ptember 10, 2015, relator Rosemary Margenau filed a petition for writ of

mandamus challenging the trial court’s August 26, 2015 “Temporary Order Following Adversary

Hearing.” The Court requests a response to the petition for writ of mandamus from the real

parties in interest

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.2. The response is due no later than 5:00 p.m. on

Friday, September 25, 2015

.

It is so ORDERED

.

Judge’s signature:_

/s/ Michael Massengale

Acting individually

Date: September 15, 2015
#### § 577.1 Scope.

This part sets forth requirements for manufacturer notification to owners, dealers, and distributors of motor vehicles and items of replacement equipment about a defect that relates to motor vehicle safety or a noncompliance with a Federal motor vehicle safety standard.

[69 FR 34959, June 23, 2004]
§ 392.60 Unauthorized persons not to be transported. ( a ) Unless specifically authorized in writing to do so by the motor carrier under whose authority the commercial motor vehicle is being operated, no driver shall transport any person or permit any person to be transported on any commercial motor vehicle other than a bus. When such authorization is issued, it shall state the name of the person to be transported, the points where the transportation is to begin and end, and the date upon which such authority expires. No written authorization, however, shall be necessary for the transportation of: ( 1 ) Employees or other persons assigned to a commercial motor vehicle by a motor carrier;
( 2 ) Any person transported when aid is being rendered in case of an accident or other emergency;
( 3 ) An attendant delegated to care for livestock.
( b ) This section shall not apply to the operation of commercial motor vehicles controlled and operated by any farmer and used in the transportation of agricultural commodities or products thereof from his/her farm or in the transportation of supplies to his/her farm.
[60 FR 38747, July 28, 1995]
#### § 604.43 Offer of proof.

A party whose evidence has been excluded by a ruling of the PO, during a hearing in which the respondent had an opportunity to respond to the offer of proof, may offer the evidence on the record when filing an appeal.
1

The Honorable Richard H. Battey, Chief Judge, United States

District Court for the District of South Dakota.

___________

No. 95-2795

___________

Juan Hernandez Flores, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * District of South Dakota.

United States of America, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: January 18, 1996

 Filed: January 25, 1996 ___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

 Juan Hernandez Flores appeals the district court's1 order

denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Having reviewed the record

and the parties' briefs, we conclude that no error of law appears,

and that the district court did not abuse its discretion in not

holding an evidentiary hearing, see Engelen v. United States, 68

F.3d 238, 240 (8th Cir. 1995). We decline to address Flores's

other arguments raised for the first time on appeal. See United

States v. Dixon, 51 F.3d 1376, 1383 (8th Cir. 1995). Accordingly,

we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2415 Reference Change House (RCH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2415

 To designate the United States Customs Administrative Building at the 
 Ysleta/Zaragosa Port of Entry located at 797 South Ysleta in El Paso, 
Texas, as the ``Timothy C. McCaghren Customs Administrative Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 1995

 Mr. Coleman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

                           December 12, 1995

               The Committee on Ways and Means discharged

                           December 12, 1995

    Rereferred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the United States Customs Administrative Building at the 
 Ysleta/Zaragosa Port of Entry located at 797 South Ysleta in El Paso, 
Texas, as the ``Timothy C. McCaghren Customs Administrative Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Customs Administrative Building at the Ysleta/
Zaragosa Port of Entry located at 797 South Ysleta in El Paso, Texas, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Timothy C. McCaghren Customs 
Administrative Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Timothy C. McCaghren Customs 
Administrative Building''.
                                 <all>
```
From: Greg Valentine [mailto:sapper06@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 9:54 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Stay out of my 401K investment! The Department of Labor is the last agency I want messing 

with my investment strategy. Keep your government fingers out of my business!
February 10, 2011

By email delivery  

Office of Regulations and Interpretations

Employee Benefits Security Administration

Attn: Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule

Room N‐5655

U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20210

Ladies and Gentlemen:

I am pleased to submit this comment letter on the Department’s proposed regulation (the “Proposed Rule”)

regarding the term “fiduciary” under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended

(“ERISA”).

I am the Operations Manager for an Investment Properties Team at a full service commercial real estate company

who handles a significant volume of sales transactions.  As I understand the Proposed Rule, when a broker on my

team, or anywhere else within my 20,000+ employee brokerage firm, represents a benefit plan, or even provides

real estate advice to an affiliated Investment Adviser, such broker will be considered an ERISA fiduciary and be

subject to ERISA regulations.  This designation will require my entire firm to implement a method to track and

monitor the various relationships that they may have to various benefit plans.  This will present significant

operational challenges because identifying/tracking entities that hold plan assets based on ERISA’s “significant

participant” or “25%” test is difficult discern because the majority of our benefit plan clients  indirectly invest in

real estate.  Additionally, these relationships are not tracked for any other purpose, so such tracking system will

have to be developed solely for this purpose.  This will place an inequitable burden on large real estate firms and

potentially increase costs for benefit plans as a result of the added burden on operational staff.   I believe the

intent of the Proposed Rule is to protect benefit plans conflicts of interests in having fiduciaries on both side of a

deal, however, as drafted the Proposed Rule does not factor in the practices of a commercial real estate

brokerage firm, and as a result could ultimately hurt a benefit plan’s ability to retain the best services from world

class real estate firms.

Thank you for taking the time to consider my comment.

Respectfully,

Melissa King
EXHIBIT 23

               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

As independent certified public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of our reports included in this Form 10-K, into the
Company's previously filed Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (Registration
Statement File Nos. 33-70326 and 33-49176), Form S-4/A (Registration Statement
File No. 333-36375) and Forms S-8 (Registration Statement File Nos. 33-42516,
33-63501, 33-63503, 33-63499, 333-03937, 333-08475, 333-45691, 333-58771 and
333-8225).


ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Fort Lauderdale, Florida,
    March 1, 2001.
DOCKET NO. FAA-2015-0789 (Duke Energy Business Services, LLC)Specified sUAS Craft - Request for Additional Information*No.MakeModelTypeDescriptionWeight w/o Payload**Max. Flight Endurance1 DJI Inspire Rotorcraft (Quadcopter) VTOL, retractable gear 2.94 kg (6.5 lb) 18 minutes2 DJI S1000 Rotorcraft (Octocopter) VTOL, retractable gear 4.2 kg (9.26 lb) 15-20 minutes3 3DRobotics X8+ Rotorcraft (Quadcopter) VTOL, retractable gear 2.56 kg (5.6 lb) 15 minutes4 AeroVironment Shrike Rotorcraft (Quadcopter) VTOL, retractable gear 2.49 kg (5.5 lb) 40 minutes5 AeroVironment Puma Fixed-Wing Hand/Rail Launch 5.9 kg (13 lb) 3.5+ hours6 UAV Solutions Phoenix 60 Rotorcraft (Hexacopter) VTOL, retractable gear 5.44 kg (12 lb) 30-35 minutes7 Lockheed Martin Indago Rotorcraft (Quadcopter) VTOL, retractable gear 2.3 kg (5 lb)*** 40 minutes8 SenseFly eBee Fixed-wing Rear-mounted propeller, HandLaunch 0.69 kg (1.52lb)  50 minutes9 SenseFly eXom Rotorcraft (Quadcopter)VTOL 1.70 kg (3.7lb)** ***22 minutes10 Draganflyer X4ES Rotorcraft (Quadcopter) VTOL, retractable gear 1.65 kg (3.64 lb) 20 minutes11 Draganflyer X6 Rotorcraft (Tricopter) VTOL, retractable gear 1.00 kg (2.2 lb) 20-25 minutes12 Draganflyer Guardian Rotorcraft (Quadcopter) VTOL, retractable gear 0.9 kg (1.98 lb) 20 minutes13 Aeyron Skyranger Rotorcraft (Quadcopter) VTOL, retractable gear 2.4 kg (5.3 lb) 50 minutes14 Aerialtronics Zenith ATX8 Rotorcraft (Quadcopter) VTOL, retractable gear 2.7 kg (5.95 lb)******35-45 minutes15 Blade 350 Qx3 (AP Combo) Rotorcraft (Quadcopter) VTOL 0.955 kg (2.11 lb)******* 10-15 minutes*Specified sUAS craft being provided in response to Request for Additional Information. Petitioner requests that the FAA makean initial determination on this docketbased on these craft while continuing to evaluate Petitioner's broader request, as specified in its petition.**All indicated weights are taken from publicly available specifications and are without payloadexcept as otherwise noted.Any weights specified with payload areprovided only for reference and not by way of limitation.***Weight includes the ION payload. Weight includes supplied WX (18.2 MP) camera.** ***Weight includes integrated payloads.******Weightdetermined by subtracting take-off weight bymax payload weight.*******Includes CGO2 GB 1080p HD (AP Combo) payload.Page 1 of 1
#### § 374.317 Identification—bus and driver.

Each bus and driver providing service shall be identified in a manner visible to passengers. The driver may be identified by name or company number.
1210-AB32-2-1283.html[7/24/2015 10:21:17 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvu-gstb

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1778

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Donna Larschan

Address:

81 JULBET DRIVE

81 JULBET DRIVE

SAYVILLE, NY, 11782

Email: dragonflies11@gmail.com

Phone: 6317664455

General Comment

I am smart enough to plan for my own retirement! Stop the proposed regulations to control how I can invest and

 control my IRA and 401K plans. I do NOT WANT THE GOVERNMENT TO HAVE CONTROL OVER

 THESE PLANS. 

The Federal government has royally screwed up Social Security, so leave these plans alone! 

A concerned Baby Boomer!

Donna Larschan
#### § 565.10 Purpose and scope.

This part specifies the format, content and physical requirements for a vehicle identification number (VIN) system and its installation to simplify vehicle identification information retrieval and to increase the accuracy and efficiency of vehicle recall campaigns.
1210-AB32-2-1647.html[7/26/2015 9:30:28 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jy2-uc6i

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2145

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: John Green

General Comment

The Government needs to stay out of my choices of how I invest my money in my 401k they can not even

 govern the things that there suppose to with out screwing it up the Government needs to stay out of our Business

 especially the Democrats and Republicans they are the biggest joke of all time.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Business and Economy    >Retail - Monthly    >FAQs
 Skip to looking for section Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  Frequently Asked Questions Use the links below to view the FAQs for each survey.
  Advance Monthly Retail
  Advance Monthly Retail Trade Survey FAQs
  Monthly Retail
  Monthly Retail Trade Survey FAQs
  Quarterly E-Commerce
  Quarterly E-Commerce Report FAQs
 Last Revised: June 09, 2020


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy