alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Historic Visit of the United States Navy’s USS Ramage

/ Published Sept. 16, 2019

USS Ramage (DDG-61), an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer, visited Beirut, Lebanon Sept. 14. The USS Ramage is named for Vice Admiral Lawson P. Ramage, a notable submarine commander and Medal of Honor recipient from World War II.                BEIRUT, Lebanon (Sept. 15, 2019) Cmdr. John B. Benfield, commanding officer of the guided-missile destroyer USS Ramage (DDG 61), greets U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon, Elizabeth Richard, during a reception. Ramage made an historic port visit to Beirut on Sept. 14, the first time in 36 years a U.S. warship had pulled into the country. (U.S. Navy photo/Released)                            Historic Visit of the United States Navy’s USS Ramage                            BEIRUT, Lebanon (Sept. 15, 2019) Cmdr. John B. Benfield, commanding officer of the guided-missile destroyer USS Ramage (DDG 61), greets U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon, Elizabeth Richard, during a reception. Ramage made an historic port visit to Beirut on Sept. 14, the first time in 36 years a U.S. warship had pulled into the country. (U.S. Navy photo/Released)            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Chief Petty Officer Jay ChuVIRIN: 190915-N-N0146-001B

During the visit to Beirut, U.S. Ambassador Elizabeth Richard and Vice Admiral Jim Malloy, Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command/Commander, U.S. Fifth Fleet, hosted an on-board reception for distinguished guests.  The Ambassador and the Vice Admiral highlighted the ongoing commitment of the United States to be a strong and enduring partner for the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) and the legitimate institutions in Lebanon, with a focus on the importance of security and stability in the eastern Mediterranean.  

Specifically, Ambassador Richard explained that, “the security and stability of the Eastern Mediterranean is important to the U.S. and to the world.”

“We are committed to our partnership with the Lebanese Armed Forces and our shared goal of maritime security in the region,” said Vice Admiral Malloy.

Ramage is deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations in support of naval operations to ensure maritime stability and security in the Central Region, connecting the Mediterranean and the Pacific through the Western Indian Ocean and three strategic choke points.
Presidential Documents

52279 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 176 

Wednesday, September 12, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of September 8, 2007 

Assignment of Reporting Functions Relating to the Information Sharing Environment 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State[,] the Secretary of Defense[,] the 

Attorney General[,] the Secretary of Energy[,] the Secretary of Homeland 

Security[, and] the Director of National Intelligence 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and laws 

of the United States, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, 

the reporting functions of the President under subsections (h) and (j) of 

section 1016 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 

2004 (Public Law 108–458), as amended by the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 (Public Law 110–53) (IRTPA), 

are hereby assigned to the Director of National Intelligence (Director). The 

Director shall consult the Secretaries of State, Defense, Energy, Homeland 

Security, and the Attorney General in performing such functions. 

Heads of departments and agencies shall, to the extent permitted by law, 

furnish to the Director information that the Director requests to perform 

such functions, in the format and on the schedule specified by the Director. 

The Director shall perform such functions in a manner consistent with 

the President’s constitutional authority to withhold information the disclosure of which could impair foreign relations, national security, the deliberative processes of the Executive, and the performance of the Executive’s 

constitutional duties. 

Any reference in this memorandum to the provision of IRTPA shall be 

deemed to include references to any hereafter-enacted provision of law 

that is the same or substantially the same as such provision. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with MISCELLANEOUS
52280 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 12, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

The Director is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in 

the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, September 8, 2007. 

[FR Doc. 07–4549 

Filed 9–11–07; 8:52 am] 

Billing code 3910–A7–M 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with MISCELLANEOUSGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
# OIR official extends condolences to Baghdad attack victims

/ Published May 11, 2016

WASHINGTON (May 11, 2016)  — Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant fighters resort to desperate acts as the terrorist organization loses ground in Iraq, the commander of Operation Inherent Resolve’s Combined Joint Forces Land Component Command said, as he extended condolences to the people affected by today’s bombing in Baghdad.

Army Maj. Gen. Gary J. Volesky told Pentagon reporters in a teleconferenced briefing from Baghdad that Iraq security forces “have the situation under control.” DoD officials said about 90 people were killed in the blast.

The Iraqis have not asked for assistance, he said, adding the attacks have not changed the Operation Inherent Resolve’s posture.

**Making Progress Against ISIL**

Volesky, who also commands the 101st Airborne Division, said conditions on the ground have changed in the last 60 days -- from clearing Ramadi and protecting the forward line of troops in the northern portion of Iraq.

“The Iraqi security forces have made great progress in the Euphrates River Valley, putting constant pressure on ISIL,” he said. “They've started operations at ... Makhmur, just to the east of Qayyarah. That's the farthest north that Iraqi security forces have been since the fall of Mosul.”

As the Iraqi forces have made gains, Volesky said, officials have seen changes in ISIL operations, as the terrorist group faces increasing Iraqi pressure.

“The enemy was originally able to use the Tigris River Valley and the Euphrates River Valley ... as one operation [to] move men, weapons and equipment,” the general said. But increased Iraqi pressure shows ISIL must conduct two separate operations in the river valleys, he added.

**Iraqi Forces Increase Pressure**

“As we saw previously, their ability to conduct large-scale offensive operations has primarily stopped. They're more ... every day on the defensive, trying to delay Iraqi security forces just to buy time,” he said.

Officials recently looked at ISIL’s targeting methodology to continue applying pressure across all of Iraq, the general said. He credited the U.S.-led coalition with assisting Iraqi forces as it counters ISIL fighters.

“This coalition is unlike any other one that I have ever served in,” he said. “I have been associated with coalitions, ... [and nations] that are parts of this coalition are making a huge contribution.”

Speaking from a 101st perspective, Volesky also noted, “Our saying is, ‘When you want it done, call in the 101.’ And we can't do what we do without our military families and the great communities that support our Army every single day.”
SERVED OCTOBER 18, 2011 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

TGI FREIGHT 

FAA DOCKET No. CP10NM0012 

(Civil Penally Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2010-1079 

ORDER DENYING 

COMPLAINANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS 

Complainant Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") has filed a Motion-forDecision ("Motion")* arguing that no questions of material fad exist and that it is entitled 

to judgment as a matter of law. The Motion is opposed by Respondent TGI Freight 

("Respondent"). 

Complainant has failed to meet its burden;_JtsMQti|mi-i^?0ENIED. The matter will 

proceed. ^ //X/7 / 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrativbfctfw Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP10NM0012 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1()00' 

ONE COPY 

Rebecca J. Hoznbin, Respondent's Counsel 

Wilkerson Hozubin 

310KSu-cet Suite405 

Anchorage, AK 99501 

TEL: 907-276-5297 

FAX: 907-276-5291 

Howard L. Martin, Jr., Complainanf 's Counsel 

Regional Counsel, Office of Regional Counsel, AAL-7 

Alaskan Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

222 W.7"'Avenue ^14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

TEL: 907-271-5273 

FAX: 907-271-2800 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Adminisfralive Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 ' • 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

-Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by e.xpediled courier, use tlie following address: Federal 

Aviation Admintsttation;600 independence Avenue, S.W.. Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
§ 92.43 Requests for recovery when the Department is the paying agency. ( a ) *Incomplete request for recovery.* If the request for recovery received by the chief of the accounting or finance office of the appropriate DOT operating element is incomplete in any respect (see § 92.21(b)) including, but not limited to, the failure to certify in writing that the employee owes the debt, the amount and basis of the debt, the date on which payment(s) is due, the date the creditor agency's right to collect the debt first accrued, and that the creditor agency's regulations implementing 5 U.S.C. 5514 were approved by OPM, the request shall be returned to the creditor agency with a statement of the deficiency. No action to implement salary offset may be initiated until a complete request has been received.
( b ) *Complete request for recovery.* If a complete request for recovery is received by the chief of the accounting or finance office of the appropriate DOT operating element, a copy of the request and any supporting documentation shall be transmitted to the appropriate payroll office, and deductions shall be scheduled to begin at the next officially established pay interval. A copy of the request and any supporting documentation shall be provided to the debtor, along with a notice of the date deductions will begin.
( c ) The DOT operating element may not review the merits of the creditor agency's determination with respect to the amount or validity of the debt as stated in the request for recovery.
#### § 512.10 Duty to amend.

The submitter shall promptly amend any supporting information provided under § 512.4 if the submitter obtains information upon the basis of which the submitter knows that the supporting information was incorrect when provided, or that the supporting information, though correct when provided to the agency, is no longer correct and the circumstances are such that a failure to amend the supporting information is in substance a knowing concealment.
#### Maria Arrex, Appellant, v. James H. Van Demark and Andries L. Brodhead, Respondents.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costB. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MAREX.COM,
INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      27,296,083
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,755
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            28,454,793
<PP&E>                                       2,514,415
<DEPRECIATION>                                 399,619
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,154,379
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,197,211
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 30,469,300
<COMMON>                                        73,371
<OTHER-SE>                                     240,039
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,154,379
<SALES>                                         11,468
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,468
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            37,466,024
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,322
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (36,444,771)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (36,444,771)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (36,444,771)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (5.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (5.51)


</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSummary of in-flight flow visualization obtained from the NASA high alpha research vehicleA summary of the surface and off-surface flow visualization results obtained in flight on the F-18 high alpha research vehicle (HARV) is presented, highlighting the extensive 3-D vortical flow on the aircraft at angles of attack up to 50 degs. The emitted fluid technique, as well as tufts and flow cones, were used to document the surface flow. A smoke generator system injected smoke into the vortex cores generated by the forebody and leading edge extensions (LEXs). Documentation was provided by onboard still and video, by air-to-air, and by postflight photography. The surface flow visualization techniques revealed laminar separation bubbles near the forebody apex, lines of separation on the forebody and LEX, and regions of attached and separated flow on the wings and fins. The off-surface flow visualization techniques showed the path of the vortex cores on the forebody and LEX as well as the LEX vortex core breakdown location. An interaction between the forebody and LEX vortices was noted. The flow over the surfaces of the vertical tail was categorized into regions of attached, unsteady, or separated flow using flow tufts.Document ID19910009742Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsFisher, David F.*(NASA Hugh L. Dryden Flight Research Facility Edwards, CA, United States)*Delfrate, John H.*(NASA Hugh L. Dryden Flight Research Facility Edwards, CA, United States)*Zuniga, Fanny A.*(NASA Hugh L. Dryden Flight Research Facility Edwards, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1991Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberH-1686NASA-TM-101734NAS 1.15:101734Meeting InformationMeeting: High Angle of Attack Technology SymposiumLocation: Hampton, VACountry: United StatesStart Date: October 30, 1990End Date: November 1, 1990Accession Number91N19055Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-68-71Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910009742.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 567.3 Definitions. All terms that are defined in the Act and the rules and standards issued under its authority are used as defined therein. The term “bumper” has the meaning assigned to it in Title I of the Cost Savings Act and the rules and standards issued under its authority. *Addendum* means the document described in § 568.5 of this chapter.
*Altered vehicle* means a completed vehicle previously certified in accordance with § 567.4 or § 567.5 that has been altered other than by the addition, substitution, or removal of readily attachable components, such as mirrors or tire and rim assemblies, or by minor finishing operations such as painting, before the first purchase of the vehicle other than for resale, in such a manner as may affect the conformity of the vehicle with one or more Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard(s) or the validity of the vehicle's stated weight ratings or vehicle type classification.
*Alterer* means a person who alters by addition, substitution, or removal of components (other than readily attachable components) a certified vehicle before the first purchase of the vehicle other than for resale.
*Chassis-cab* means an incomplete vehicle, with a completed occupant compartment, that requires only the addition of cargo-carrying, work-performing, or load-bearing components to perform its intended functions.
*Completed vehicle* means a vehicle that requires no further manufacturing operations to perform its intended function.
*Final-stage manufacturer* means a person who performs such manufacturing operations on an incomplete vehicle that it becomes a completed vehicle.
*Incomplete trailer* means a vehicle that is capable of being drawn and that consists, at a minimum, of a chassis (including the frame) structure and suspension system but needs further manufacturing operations performed on it to become a completed vehicle.
*Incomplete vehicle* means ( 1 ) An assemblage consisting, at a minimum, of chassis (including the frame) structure, power train, steering system, suspension system, and braking system, in the state that those systems are to be part of the completed vehicle, but requires further manufacturing operations to become a completed vehicle; or
( 2 ) An incomplete trailer.
Incomplete vehicle document or IVD means the document described in 49 CFR 568.4(a) and (b).
*Incomplete vehicle manufacturer* means a person who manufactures an incomplete vehicle by assembling components none of which, taken separately, constitute an incomplete vehicle.
*Intermediate manufacturer* means a person, other than the incomplete vehicle manufacturer or the final-stage manufacturer, who performs manufacturing operations on a vehicle manufactured in two or more stages.
*Replica motor vehicle* means a motor vehicle meeting the definition of replica motor vehicle in 49 CFR part 586.
[70 FR 7430, Feb. 14, 2005, as amended at 87 FR 13232, Mar. 9, 2022]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,018
<SECURITIES>                                    62,521
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,461
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,832
<INVENTORY>                                      9,264
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                78,551
<PP&E>                                         386,284
<DEPRECIATION>                                 123,696
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 670,565
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,650
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,698
<OTHER-SE>                                     223,978
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   670,565
<SALES>                                        159,243
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               159,243
<CGS>                                           90,045
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   90,045
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,795
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   762
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,796
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,845
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,235
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,610
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,610
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .89


</TABLE>
§ 242.123 Monitoring operational performance. ( a ) Each railroad shall adopt and comply with a program that meets the requirements of this section. When any person including, but not limited to, each railroad, railroad officer, supervisor, and employee violates any requirement of a program which complies with the requirements of this section, that person shall be considered to have violated the requirements of this section.
( b ) Each railroad shall have a program to monitor the conduct of its certified conductors by performing unannounced operating rules compliance tests. The program shall include procedures to address the testing of certified conductors who are not given an unannounced compliance test in a calendar year pursuant to paragraph (f) of this section. At a minimum, such procedures shall include the following: ( 1 ) A requirement that an unannounced compliance test must be conducted within 30 days of a return to conductor service; and
( 2 ) The railroad must retain a written record indicating the date that the conductor stopped performing service that requires certification pursuant to this part, the date that the conductor returned to performing service that requires certification pursuant to this part, and the date that the unannounced compliance test was performed.
( c ) Except as provided in paragraph (f) of this section, each conductor shall be given at least one unannounced compliance test in each calendar year by a railroad officer who meets the requirements of § 217.9(b)(1) of this chapter.
( d ) The unannounced test program shall: ( 1 ) Test those persons certified as a conductor pursuant to § 242.107(b)(1) for compliance with one or more operational tests in accordance with the provisions of § 217.9 of this chapter; and one or more provisions of §§ 218.99 through 218.109 of this chapter; and
( 2 ) Test those persons certified as a passenger conductor pursuant to § 242.107(b)(2) for compliance with one or more operational tests in accordance with the provisions of § 217.9 of this chapter. ( i ) For persons certified as passenger conductors pursuant to § 242.107(b)(2) who do not require compliance with part 218, subpart F of this chapter except under emergency circumstances, the requirement for an annual, unannounced test on the requirements of part 218, subpart F may be satisfied by annual training.
( ii ) [Reserved]
( e ) Each railroad's program shall indicate the action the railroad will take in the event that it finds deficiencies with a conductor's performance during an unannounced compliance test administered in accordance with this section.
( f ) A certified conductor who is not performing a service that requires certification pursuant to this part need not be given an unannounced compliance test. However, when the certified conductor returns to a service that requires certification pursuant to this part, that certified conductor must be tested pursuant to this section within 30 days of his or her return.