alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
August 29, 2015

EBSA, E-ORI -EBSA
Reference: RIN 1210-AB32

Dear Secretary Perez:

| appreciate the opportunity to comment and oppose the Department of Labor’s proposed rule to
prohibit option trading in IRA’S.

As a long-time manager of my retirement, the ability to write covered-calls on stocks allows me to earn
extra income on stocks such as A.T.T. and VZ that do not move appreciable in the space of several
months or longer. (Strategy: buy call options for the following year—leaps—several points above the
stock’s current price.) Also the ability to buy deep in the money, long-dated (leap) call options allows me
to invest less money in stocks of companies | expect to rise in the future.

In addition, buying puts on stocks that have appreciated, and in which | have a substantial profit,
provides protect on the downside should the stocks take a sudden spill as happed just recently (the last
week of August); while selling puts to earn income on stocks | am willing to own at a lower price is an
effective way to purchase stock at a lower price while also being paid to do so.

In short, | urge the DOL to reconsider the proposal to prohibit the ability to better manage one’s IRA
through various option strategies. Risk management through options is a prudent way to allow retired
individual who manage their own retirement and those of their spouse the opportunity to protect
portfolios while increasing potential returns.

The best way the DOL can serve investor's interest is to work with the Securities and Exchange
Commission to develop sensible standards for trading across all retail accounts. Thank you for
considering my opposition to the blanket prohibition of option trading in IRA’s.

Sincerely,

Ernest Neal Mize

339 Transylvania Park
Lexington, KY. 40508
Phone: (859) 309-3677
nmize53347@aol.com
THE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON DC 20590 

The. Honorable Doc·Hastings 

U.S. House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Congressman Hastings: 

. July 17, 2012 

Thank you for your letter supporting the proposal submitted by the Pangborn Memorial Airport 

for a grant under the U.S. Department of Transportation's Small Community Air Service 

Development Program. 

The Small Community Air Service Development Program was established to help smaller 

communities address air service deficiencies, particularly issues related to high airfares or 

insufficient service. Under the statute, the Department may make a maximum of 40 gr~t 

awards each year, although no more t.han 4 awards may be to communities in the same State. 

In order to provide communities with latitude in developing solutions to their air service 

deficiencies, the statute provides flexibility in the types of projects that can be funded. 

On May 1 5, the Department issued an order requesting that communities interested in receiving a 

grant this year file their applications by Jtme 11. As these grant requestsare pending before the 

Department, I cannot comment on the merits of any particular proposal. I assure you that the 

Department will give full and fair consideration to all proposals that have been properly filed .. 

As is our normal practice, I am placing a cop · t: our letter and this response in Docket 

DOT-OST-2012-0069 as a contact outside · e r ord of this matter. I appr e your interest in 

this program. 
iJOC HASTINGS 

Cot,1M,Tit:E ON • 

r>JA run At ilr.:;;ounces 

CNAif?fV!.·\·'\J 

K{~lngrtsii of tbe ?Mniteb $tates ;~ouse of l\cpresentnttbes 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

June 6. 2012 

· ,.;3 tr:r,o:;~·.-~r.Trt H<".•tr'j( {)ffJ(r iJII•H··~.:t 1 

:.::•:;u'·1tdL'J DC ::OSit) 

2 I i 5 S;,!,"n ,:\r·Jilf<£ ~· ... Lour, Swrc 0 

?1'\":.l~(J. 1///~ 9:.)301 

'f12 Eo\!:T v~~.l';oU·; A·,crJ'.'t. StitH 7(·0-

. \'."'.'<It·~·' \VI\ ~!0901 

r~u:J) ~;r.?.-3tt.t3 

I am writing about a Small Community Air Service Grant applied for by Pangborn 

Memorial Airport in East Wenatchee. W A. 

Airport leaders want to increase passenger growth through a marketing plan that appeals 

to both residents flnd visitors with the increase of the local economy as a result. Alaska Airlines 

and SeaPort Airlines serve the community and provide a significant transportation asset to 

eastern Washington. Both local and federal funds would be used to develop the marking plan. 

Please give Pangborn Memorial Airport full and fair consideration in its application 

process for a Small Community Air Service Grant. 

Sincerely, . 

---- <::....\.._~"! // ) L. ...,L ,.c-:;:;l·-- )V"V~ / .· . 

Doc Has;ings ~ Member of Congress 

DH:jw 

Please \"isit my wehsite at tv\1'H'.hostinjf.5.JJouse .• IJ!JX l.l'ltere you ca11 sign up to receil·e email updates ahout my work 

in Congress on issues ofimportancl! lo ( 'entral Washington. 

510-120613-005~.
#### § 585.122 Purpose.

The purpose of these reporting requirements is to assist the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in determining whether a manufacturer has complied with the rear visibility requirements in paragraphs S5.5 and S6.2 of Standard No. 111, Rear visibility (49 CFR 571.111).
----

(2004/C 88 E/0526)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0606/04

by Camilo Nogueira Román (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(27 February 2004)

Subject:   The Spanish Government's respect for the principle of additionality in the funding of the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund

Has the Commission, in recent years, made any specific assessment of the principle of additionality in the financing of the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund by the Spanish Government? What were the results? Has the Commission checked the relationship which exists between the zero deficit budgetary policy of the Spanish Government and its respect for the Community principle of additionality, so that the full application of new public investment which the Community funds back up is guaranteed?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(30 April 2004)

Under Article 11 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds (1), we are required to carry out a mid-term verification of additionality in the Member States and regions receiving Structural Fund support. Additionality does not apply to the Cohesion Fund.

The results of the exercise show that Spain has complied with the additionality requirement. National public expenditure increased by an annual average of 3,61 % over the period 2000 to 2002 compared to the level set at the beginning of the period by the Spanish authorities in agreement with our officials.

Compliance with additionality — the requirement that national is not replaced by Community funding — is not by definition incompatible with a sound budget policy. Macroeconomic stability is necessary in order to create the conditions for economic growth. The experience of the cohesion countries is that budget discipline can be reconciled with maintaining a high level of investment in well targeted priorities for the less favoured regions.

----

(1)OJ L 161, 26.6.1999.

----
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

28 January 2004

in Joined Cases T-146/02 to T-153/02: Deutsche SiSi-Werke GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

(Community trade mark - Three-dimensional mark - Form of drinks packaging - Stand-up pouch - Absolute grounds for refusal - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Need to preserve a sign's availability)

(2004/C 94/112)

Language of the case: German

In Joined Cases T-146/02 to T-153/02, Deutsche SiSi-Werke GmbH & Co. Betriebs KG, established in Eppelheim (Germany), represented by A. Franke, lawyer, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), (Agent: G. Schneider): Actions brought against the decisions of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 28 February 2002 (Cases R 719/1999 2 to R 724/1999 2, R 747/1999 2 and R 748/1999 2) concerning the registration of three-dimensional trade marks (stand-up pouches), the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of N.J. Forwood, President, J. Pirrung and A.W.H. Meij, Judges; D. Christensen, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 28 January 2004, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 180 of 27.07.2002.

----
From: Mark Diodati [mailto:markdiodati@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 9:37 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA; Mark Diodati 

Subject: annuity vs stocks thru great depression

Hello , 

 If I had a choice between : 

 1) converting my 401k to an annuity or 

 2) investing in stocks from 1929 on .Yes you guessed it this was during the great 

depression ,in which the dow went from 380 to 40 (1929 thru 1932). 

I would pick number two .This represents how bad of an investment annuities are. I 

double my money every 6 yrs investing in the s and p 500 .Can an annuity do that 

,no.What will my kids get from an annuity when I die ,I am guessing nothing ,or, at 

best next to nothing compared to stock performance. 

 Bye Mark Dio Dati 

Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. Sign up now.
EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                  Percentage
                                                                                                   of voting
                                                                                                   securities
                                         Incorporated                                              owned by
                                           under the                                               immediate
Name                                        laws of                   Parent                         parent
----                                        -------                   ------                         ------

<S>                                       <C>                   <C>                                     <C>
CompuDyne Corp. of Maryland *            Maryland               CompuDyne Corp.                       100%
Quanta Systems Corporation *             Connecticut            CompuDyne Corp.                       100%
CompuDyne, Inc.**                        Delaware               CompuDyne Corp.                       100%
CorrLogic, Inc. *                        Nevada***              CompuDyne Corp.                       100%
Norment Security Group, Inc. *           Delaware               CompuDyne Corp.                       100%
Norshield Corporation  *                 Alabama                CompuDyne Corp.                       100%
Norment Industries S.A. (Pty) Ltd.       South Africa           Norment Security Group, Inc.          100%
Fiber SenSys, Inc. *                     Oregon***              CompuDyne Corp.                       100%
Tiburon, Inc. *                          Virginia               CompuDyne Corp.                       100%
</TABLE>



   Note:
     *    All subsidiaries of the Registrant as of December 31, 2004, are
          included in the consolidated financial statements of the Registrant.
     **   CompuDyne, Inc. filed for petition in bankruptcy on December 31, 1991.
     ***  CorrLogic, Inc. and Fiber SenSys, Inc. converted to Delaware limited
          liability companies on February 28, 2005.
§ 831.52 Responsibility of NTSB in marine investigations. ( a ) The NTSB may conduct an investigation of a major marine casualty or a marine casualty of a vessel (including, but not limited to, allisions, abandonments, and accidents) alone or jointly with the USCG pursuant to the joint regulations in part 850 of this chapter.
( b ) Nothing in this part may be construed to conflict with the regulations in part 850 of this chapter, which were prescribed jointly by the NTSB and USCG under the authority of 49 U.S.C. 1131(a)(1)(E).
( c ) In an investigation led by the USCG, the NTSB may perform separate activities in furtherance of its own analysis or at the request of the USCG. The NTSB and USCG will coordinate to ensure the agencies do not duplicate work or hinder the progress of the investigation.
( d ) Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 1131(a)(1)(F), the NTSB is responsible for the investigation of other accidents that may include marine and boating accidents not covered by part 850 of this chapter, and certain accidents involving transportation and/or release of hazardous materials.
H. Res. 301

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

December 4, 2001.

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the

House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Mr. Boozman.

COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS: Mr. Boozman.

Attest:

Clerk.
Editorial Note on Part 386
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 386 appear at 65 FR 7755, Feb. 16, 2000, and 88 FR 80182, Nov. 17, 2023.

§ 386.56 Hearings. ( a ) As soon as practicable after his/her appointment, the administrative law judge shall issue an order setting the date, time, and place for the hearing. The order shall be served on the parties and become a part of the record of the proceedings. The order may be amended for good cause shown.
( b ) *Conduct of hearing.* The administrative law judge presides over the hearing. Hearings are open to the public unless the administrative law judge orders otherwise.
( c ) *Evidence.* Except as otherwise provided in these rules and the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 551 *et seq.,* the Federal Rules of Evidence shall be followed.
( d ) *Information obtained by investigation.* Any document, physical exhibit, or other material obtained by the Administration in an investigation under its statutory authority may be disclosed by the Administration during the proceeding and may be offered in evidence by counsel for the Administration.
( e ) *Record.* The hearing shall be stenographically transcribed and reported. The transcript, exhibits, and other documents filed in the proceedings shall constitute the official record of the proceedings. A copy of the transcript and exhibits will be made available to any person upon payment of prescribed costs.
# MD5 checksums generated by MD5summer (http://www.md5summer.org)
# Generated 10/7/2009 12:13:25 PM

9925d9ff16e0aa1cbad8038b7cfac3b9 *30003PC6.pdf
#### The Trustees of Columbia College in the City of New York, Respondent, *v.*The New York Elevated Railroad Company et al., Appellants.

*Trustees of Columbia College*v. N. *Y. Elevated R. R. Co.,*135 App. Div. 916, affirmed.

(Argued May 8, 1911;

decided May 30, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 6, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an abutting owner’s action to enjoin *569the maintenance of defendant’s elevated railroad and for damages.

*J. Osgood Nichols*and *James L. Quackenbush*for appellants.

*Charles H. Strong*and *Charles L. Jones*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Chase and Collin, JJ. Absent: Hiscock, J.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  of  AmBase  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the period  ending  December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Richard A. Bianco, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date:  March 29, 2007                           /s/ Richard A. Bianco
                                                ---------------------
                                                Richard A. Bianco
                                                Chairman, President and Chief
                                                Executive Officer
                                                AmBase Corporation
PAGE 02/02 

10/18/2010 16:2& 8ie3294106 SAD 

® Small Airplane Olrectorale 

901 Locust 

,,^ ^ _ Kansas City, MO 6410B 

U.S. Depattmenr 

of TVansportatlon 

f9tlwal Aviation 

Administration 

$inr 1 S «i«fl1^ r ? :T'.-.-^-,~ii. 

—< —'.c/:>TC) 

MT. William D. Holder ^ S^ ^ 

Park County Sheriffs Office- Search & Rescue Dcpt. -° -z- ^ 

1311 ll"'Street ^ ^"^ 

Cody.WY 82414-3536 

Dear Mr. Holder: 

We are enclosing a grant of your petition submitted on September 14, 2010, requesting 

exemption from the req-uirements of §§ 23.25 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 

CFR). The exemption allows the Park County SherifTs Office, Search and Rescue 

Department, to takeoff in the Aviat Al -B Husky aircraft at weights up to 2200 pounds to 

carry two crew, full fuel, and survival equipment for search and rescue operations. If you 

have any questions, please contact Mr. Leshe B. Taylor at the above address or call him on 

816-329-4134. 

Sincerely, 

-T 

John Colomy 

Acting Manager, Small Airplane .Directorate 

Aircraft Certification Service 

Enclosure
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential.



# United States Court of Appeals

**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

VIRNETX INC.,

Appellant

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,

Appellee

______________________

2019

- 1725

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,792

.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed . R. App.

P. 42 (b).

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

August 10, 2023

Date /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

Jarrett B. Perlow

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: August 10, 2023 Case: 19-1725 Document: 46 Page: 1 Filed: 08/10/2023
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906****OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fisher Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I, Colleen B. Brown, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that: (1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: May 9, 2007       /s/ Colleen B. Brown Colleen B. Brown    President and Chief Executive Officer
Exercise Steppe Eagle 12 comes to close
 By Staff Sgt. Mylinda Durousseau , Third Army Public Affairs Office
  A Kazakh soldier ensures a chemical protective mask is properly sealed during exercise Steppe Eagle 12. Third Army/ARCENT Soldiers joined more than 1,000 military members from six other countries as part of the multi-national peacekeeping exercise. (Photo by Staff Sgt. Mylinda DuRousseau, Third Army/ARCENT Public Affairs)
 CAMP ILLISKY, Kazakhstan (September 20, 2012) — Steppe Eagle 2012 came to an end as guest speakers commended soldiers from the United States, Kazakhstan, United Kingdom and Tajikistan for a job well done Sept. 20. “I want to congratulate you on another successful Steppe Eagle exercise,” said Third Army/ARCENT Commanding General, Lt. Gen. Vincent K. Brooks. “To the soldiers, thank you for serving your countries and for bringing our countries closer together.” More than 1,000 troops participated in exercise Steppe Eagle, an annual multi-national peacekeeping exercise designed to improve interoperability while exchanging ideas and building relationships through training together. “[Steppe Eagle] is an excellent opportunity to provide a quality military training experience to militaries beyond the United States and the Republic of Kazakhstan,” said Brooks. “This year U.S. soldiers were able to work with not only the Kazakhstan Brigade but also a platoon from Tajikistan.” The two-week exercise focused on the specific skills needed to work with coalitions and gave participating nations an opportunity to gain experience working together. The efforts put forth by soldiers from the 2nd Battalion, 30th Infantry; 158th Maneuver Enhancement Brigade along with supporting elements of the Arizona Army National Guard; 1st Battalion, 181st Field Artillery Brigade of the Tennessee Army National Guard; and Kazakhstani soldiers during the training event reinforced the concept of teamwork and continued Third Army’s mission of Shaping the Future. “It is a privilege and an honor to be back at Illisky training area to see first-hand the cooperation between our great soldiers,” Brooks said.
# Map            Thailand administrative divisions.
Michael Brackett, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

Civil Action No. 

Eric Holder, U.S. Attorney General, 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Defendant. ) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

FILED 

APR 3 0 2012 

Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy 

Courts for the District of Columbia 

12 0683 

This matter is before the Court on review of plaintiffs pro se complaint and application 

to proceed in forma pauperis. The application will be granted and the complaint will be 

dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (requiring dismissal of a prisoner's complaint upon a 

determination that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted). 

Plaintiff is an inmate at the United States Penitentiary Hazelton in Bruceton Mills, West 

Virginia, suing under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 

U.S. 388 (1971 ), to challenge the constitutionality of the statutes under which he was convicted. 

The gravamen of the complaint is that the sentencing court, the United States District Court for 

the Northern District of West Virginia, lacked jurisdiction over plaintiffs criminal prosecution. 

Because the success of plaintiffs claim would necessarily void his conviction, plaintiff 

cannot recover monetary damages, which is the only available remedy under Bivens, without first 

showing that he has invalidated the conviction by "revers[al] on direct appeal, expunge[ment] by 

executive order, declar[ ation of invalidity] by a state tribunal authorized to make such 

determination, or ... a federal court's issuance of a writ of habeas corpus." Heck v. Humphrey, 
512 U.S. 477,486-87 (1994); see, e.g., Taylor v. US Bd. of Parole, 194 F.2d 882,883 (D.C. 

Cir. 1952) (stating that a motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is the proper vehicle for 

challenging the constitutionality of a statute under which a defendant is convicted); Ojo v. I.N.S., 

I 06 F.3d 680, 683 (51h Cir. 1997) (explaining that the sentencing court is the only court with 

jurisdiction to hear a defendant's complaint regarding errors that occurred before or during 

sentencing). 

Plaintiff has not shown the invalidation of his conviction and, thus, has failed to state a 

claim upon which relief can be granted under Bivens. A separate Order of dismissal accompanies 

this Memorandum Opinion . 

..t;t.., 

Date: April~' 2012 

2