alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 701.10 Appeals. ( a ) *Appeals of adverse determinations.* ( 1 ) The requesting party may appeal: ( i ) A decision to withhold any requested record in whole or in part;
( ii ) A determination that a requested record does not exist or cannot be located;
( iii ) A denial of a request for expedited treatment; or
( iv ) Any disputed fee matter or the denial of a request for a fee waiver.
( 2 ) The appeal must be addressed to the President and Chief Executive Officer, in care of the Chief Legal Officer and General Counsel; National Railroad Passenger Corporation; 60 Massachusetts Avenue NE., Washington, DC 20002.
( 3 ) The appeal must be in writing and specify the relevant facts and the basis for the appeal. The appeal letter and envelope should be marked prominently that it is a Freedom of Information Act or “FOIA” appeal to ensure that it is properly routed.
( 4 ) The appeal must be received by the President's Office within ninety days of the date of denial.
( 5 ) An appeal will not be acted upon if the request becomes a matter of FOIA litigation.
( b ) *Responses to appeals.* The decision on any appeal shall be made in writing. ( 1 ) A decision upholding an adverse determination in whole or in part shall contain a statement of the reason(s) for such action, including any FOIA exemption(s) applied. The requesting party shall also be advised of the provision for judicial review of the decision contained in 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B).
( 2 ) *Engaging in dispute resolution services provided by OGIS.* Mediation is a voluntary process. If Amtrak agrees to participate in the mediation services provided by OGIS, it will actively engage as a partner to the process in an attempt to resolve the dispute.
( 3 ) If the adverse determination is reversed or modified on appeal in whole or in part, the requesting party shall be notified, and the request shall be reprocessed in accordance with the decision.
( c ) *When appeal is required.* The requesting party generally must timely appeal any adverse determination prior to seeking judicial review.
From: Ron Blum [mailto:roland5m@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 4:34 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Lifetime Income Distributions

I do not want to turn my money over to any financial institution. The incentives for pay 

of the financial services employees is not geared to the success of their management of 

customers accounts but rather to the income that they generate for their employer. I 

wanted a lifetime guaranteed income but found that the amount I had to sacrifice 

compared to what I do on my own and the increased risk I had to assume through the 

non-diversification of my assets and my distrust of my asset holder made an annuity 

unacceptable. 

Virtually no financial services company is as economically sound as they were twenty 

five years ago. If they do not care about their debt ratings, why would anyone want to 

give their money to them. 

The industry has made itself a joke and should not take them seriously. 

Ronald Blum
1210-AB32-2-1600.html[7/26/2015 8:44:24 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jxx-b895

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2097

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: John Probst

Address:

PO Box 2874

Homer, AK, 99603

Email: jproany@gmail.com

General Comment

Stay the hell out of my money. I earned it and if I loose it it is my bussiness. I am the only person that has the

 right to decide where my money should be invested
Editorial Note on Part 391
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 391 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 391.64 Grandfathering for certain drivers who participated in a vision waiver study program. ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) Until March 22, 2023, the provisions of § 391.41(b)(10) do not apply to a driver who was a participant in good standing on March 31, 1996, in a waiver study program concerning the operation of commercial motor vehicles by drivers with visual impairment in one eye; *provided:* ( 1 ) The driver is physically examined every year, including an examination by an ophthalmologist or optometrist attesting to the fact that the driver: ( i ) Is otherwise qualified under § 391.41; and
( ii ) Continues to measure at least 20/40 (Snellen) in the better eye.
( 2 ) The driver provides a copy of the ophthalmologist or optometrist report to the medical examiner at the time of the annual medical examination.
( 3 ) The driver provides a copy of the annual medical certification to the employer for retention in the driver's qualification file and retains a copy of the certification on his/her person while driving for presentation to a duly authorized federal, state or local enforcement official.
( 4 ) On March 22, 2023, the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section are no longer in effect, and any medical examiner's certificate issued under § 391.43 on the basis that the driver is qualified by operation of the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section, related to drivers with visual impairment in one eye, is void.
[61 FR 13346, Mar. 26, 1996, as amended at 83 FR 47521, Sept. 19, 2018; 87 FR 3419, Jan. 21, 2022; 87 FR 7756, Feb. 10, 2022]
I n c o r p o r a t i o n b y R e f e r e n ce D o c k e t I D N o
. E P A

- HQ

- O AR

- 2009

- 0926

Ja nu a r y 7 , 2010

T h e c o n t e n t s o f t h e f

o l l o w i n g d o c k e t s a r e h e r e b y i n c o r po r a t e d b y r e f e r e n c e i n t o a n d a r e

c o n s i d e r e d t o b e i n c l ud e d i n , c o n t a i n e d i n a n d t o h a v e b e e n p l ace d i n D o c k e t E P A

- HQ

- O A R2009

- 0926 ( C a r b o n D i o x i d e I n j ec t i o n a n d G e o l og i c S e qu e s t r a t i o n R e p o r

t i n g R u l e ) :

1) E P A

- HQ

- O A R

- 2008

- 0508 ( G r ee n h o u s e G a s M a nd a t o r y R e p o r t i n g ) 2) E P A

- HQ

- O A R

- 2009

- 0923 ( O i l a n d N a t u r a l G a s S y s t e m s ) 3) E P A

- HQ

- O A R

- 2009

- 0924 ( D e t e r mi n a t i o n o f C o n f i d e n t i a l B u s i n e ss I n f

o r m a t i o n ) 4) E P A

- HQ

- O A R

- 2009

- 0925 ( C o r p o r a t e P a r e n t a n d N A I C S C o d e )

A c c e ss i n g d o c k e t s : P ub l i c l y a v a il a b l e d o c k e t m a t e r i a l s a r e a v a i l a b l e e i t h e r e l e c t r o n i c a ll y t h r o ug h

www

. r e g u l a t i o n s

. g ov o r i n h a r d c o p y a t E P A ’ s D o c k e t C e n t e r , P ub li c R ea d i ng R oo m , E P A W e s t B u il d i ng , R o o m 3334

, 1301 C o n s t i t u t i o n A v e n u e , N W

, Wa s h i ng t o n , D C 2000 4

. T h i s D o c k e t F a c il i t y i s o p e n f

r o m 8 : 30 a

. m

. t o 4 : 3 0 p

. m ., M o n d a y t h r o ug h F r i d a y , e x c l

u d i ng l e g a l h o li d a y s

. T h e t e l e p h o n e n u m

b e r f o r t h e P ub li c R e a d i n g R o o m i s ( 202 ) 566

- 1744

, a n d t h e t e l e p h o n e

n u m b e r f o r t h e A i r D o c k e t i s ( 202 ) 566

- 174 2

.
Exhibit 10.1



July 23, 2002



Fisher Broadcasting-Georgia, LLC

WFXG-TV

600 University Street, Suite 1525

Seattle, Washington 98101



Attn: Ben Tucker, President



Re: WFXG (Augusta, GA)



Dear Mr. Tucker:



This letter confirms that Fox Broadcasting Company (FOX) and
Fisher Broadcasting-Georgia, LLC (Licensee) have agreed that notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Station Affiliation Agreement (Agreement) dated April 20, 2001 between Licensee and FOX, Licensee and FOX hereby
agree to extend the term of the Agreement, and the Agreement shall end on June 30, 2007.



AGREED AND ACCEPTED:



|FOX BROADCASTING
COMPANY |  |                    |  | FISHER BROADCASTING-GEORGIA,
LLC
|------------------------ |  | ------------------ |  | --------------------------------
|                        
|By:                      |  | /s/    [ILLEGIBLE] |  |                                 
|Its:                     |  | President          |  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                         138,777
<SECURITIES>                                    22,642
<RECEIVABLES>                                  118,336
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               382,816
<PP&E>                                         355,212
<DEPRECIATION>                                 289,301
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 802,536
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          114,989
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     651,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   802,536
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               841,887
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,038,231
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (186,502)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (66,668)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (119,834)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (119,834)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.29)
        

</TABLE>
June 2023 Month in Review: The Defeat ISIS Mission in Iraq and Syria
 
  July 6, 2023
Release Number 20230706-01
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **TAMPA, Fla. –** During the month of June 2023, U.S. Central Command, along with coalition and other partners, conducted a total of 37 D-ISIS operations, resulting in 13 ISIS operatives killed and 21 detained. "The continued reduction in ISIS activities in Iraq and Syria are a testament to our partner forces’ commitment to the safety and stability of the region,” said Maj. Gen. Matthew McFarlane, CJTF-OIR Commanding General. “The Coalition continues to advise, assist, and enable our partners in the lead toward an enduring defeat of ISIS.”
These operations showcase our enduring commitment to the lasting defeat of ISIS to preserve regional security and stability. The following is a breakdown of D-ISIS operations for June 2023 by country. **In Iraq**
   **In Syria**30 partnered operations
   7 partnered operations0 U.S.-only operations
   0 U.S.-only operations12 ISIS operatives killed
   1 ISIS operatives killed7 ISIS operatives detained
   14 ISIS operatives detained “We commend the competence, professionalism, and dedication of our Iraqi, Syrian, and coalition partner forces,” said Gen. Michael “Erik” Kurilla, CENTCOM commander. “Our continued efforts to defeat ISIS can only be accomplished through sustained and comprehensive partnered operations.” -30-
## (!tuugriz uf tI Thiiti1i fafc ^^Hi^ı^t^^^, ^0 ZO5^5

Administrator Lisa Jackson USEPA Headquarters Mel Rios Building 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W. Washington, DC 20460 Assistant Administrator Gina McCarthy USEPA Headquarters Ariel Rios Building 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W. Washington, DC 20460

Dear Administrator Jackson and Assistant Administrator McCarthy: We are writing to express our strong support for strengthening the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for fine particle pollution (PM2.5 ). Clean air is essential to human and environmental health. We commend the EPA for its proposal to reduce current standards for fine particulate matter from 15 micrograms per cubic meter to 12-13 micrograms per cubic meter. These standards would save thousands of lives and would reduce health complications and medical expenses for millions of Americans. Nonetheless, we can do more to protect communities across the country by reducing fine particulate matter standards to the levels recommended by our leading health specialists. We are supportive of the stronger annual standard of 11 micrograms per cubic meter and the 24-hour standard of 25 micrograms per cubic meter proposed by health groups, including the American Lung Association and American Public Health Association, and environmental justice organizations across the nation. The burden of air pollution and its negative health effects are not evenly shared. While short- and long-term exposure to fine particulate matter can harm us all, the increased impact on children and the elderly requires an update to our current standards that fit with health experts' recommendations. Additionally, people from low-income communities often face higher exposure to such pollution. Studies show that health issues including asthma and premature death increase in areas with higher emissions of particle pollution, especially for older adults, children and people of lower economic status. The January 2011 CDC Report on Health Disparities and Inequalities found that minorities, including African, Asian, Pacific Islander and Hispanic Americans, are more likely to reside in counties that do not meet the standard for fine particulate matter or ozone. Pollution sources and other environmental hazards often affect the metropolitan areas, many of which have large minority populations. The reduction in current standards must include consideration of the serious health implications brought on by fine particulate matter. The stronger standards we are recommending would

PRINTED ON RCYCLD PAPERprotect our most vulnerable Americans from the health threats posed by this pollution. We urge

the EPA to adopt strong, health-protective standards for fine particulate pollution.

Earl B'1umeii!iir Member of Congress

s Moran ber of Congress SpS'e ebI*n Member of Congress dy Chu Member of Congress aüfM. Grijalva Member of Congre

hn C5nyers, Jr. ember of Congres

Lee ember of Congress

chakowsy mber of Congress
ERIK PAULSEN

THIRD DISTRICT, MINNESOTA

COMMITTEE ON ia
WAYS AND MEANS » 4

omens Congress of the Anited States
SUBCOMMI i HUMAN RESOURCES House of Representatives
caecoamceneineonTY Washington, BC 20515-2303

June 24, 2011

The Honorable Hilda L. Solis

U.S. Department of Labor

Frances Perkins Building

Third Street and Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20210

Dear Secretary Solis:

I am writing with respect to the Department of Labor’s proposed regulation revising the term
“fiduciary.”

While I applaud the Departments laudable goal to update the definition of a fiduciary under the
Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), I fear that the tule as proposed would do
far more harm and could cause many negative unintended consequences.

As proposed, this rule would greatly expand the number of service providers and types of
activities subjected to the ERISA fiduciary regime. This will require many services providers to
restructure businesses operations, curtail providing plan participants and investors with much
needed investment information, and increase costs for these services. I am especially concerned
this rule negatively impact middle income investors in a disproportionate manner with much
higher costs or a reduced amount of investment advice. Additionally, the proposed rule could
eliminate well established tools used by many pension plans to manage risk.

Given the potential impact on millions of Americans who save either through their employer-
provided plan or in an IRA, I believe the necessary fixes to make the rule workable are so
extensive the rule should be reproposed so the public can provide comment on the revisions. I
also believe it would give an opportunity for the Department of Labor to work in a more
harmonized manner with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Commodities. Futures
Trading Commission and the Treasury Department, all of which have responsibilities related to
your Department’s proposed regulation.

I appreciate your consideration and please do not hesitate to contact my office if you have further
questions.

Sincerely,

Zi Colo _

Erik Paulsen
Member of Congress

PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
### Request for Information X-Fl ite Aerial LLC (FAA-2015-3513) 9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA)

Dear Mr. Caccamo: This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

− 2015

− 3513). This information is necessary for the Fede ral Aviation Administrati on (FAA) to process your p etition.

z Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Op erations Manual (MPTOM) wh ich is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closedset filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your inte ntion by the requested response date listed below. Please submit the additional informati on (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov . Once your information has been submitted, plea se also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comm ent tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. I f you want us to process your request any further, we mu st receive the information de scribed above by December 9, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we wi ll close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions, please feelfree to contact me at (202) 267-2999. FAA Office of Rulemaking Sent : Wednesday , November 25, 2015 9:45 AM To: J on@ x -flite.net
Afghan National Security Forces disrupted two major insurgent rings
 By Public Affairs COMBINED JOINT TASK FORCE- 82 PAO, CJTF 82 Public Affairs
  BAGRAM AIRFIELD, Afghanistan – Afghan National Security Forces, advised by Coalition forces, disrupted two major insurgent rings by arresting key facilitators responsible for improvised explosive device attacks against civilian and military targets Dec. 24, 2007. The combined operations, led by Afghan National Police and Afghan Border Police units, were conducted in Kandahar and Paktya Provinces. The first operation involved tracking and arresting an insurgent in Chamkani District, Paktya Province. The insurgent was suspected to be involved in a number of attacks against ANSF and Coalition forces operating in the area. "One individual is a suspected insurgent facilitator, believed to be responsible for coordinating IED attacks and insurgent activity directed against ANSF personnel over the past year" said Army Maj. Chris Belcher, a Combined Joint Task Force-82 spokesman. "The successful ANP operation should go a long way in disrupting insurgents’ operations in the immediate Chamkani area. "This arrest will also serve to dramatically increase force protection in the area, especially for ANP and ABP vehicles which have been the primary target of the insurgent IED attacks," he said. The ANP and ABP are making great strides in their development and have led to greater security in the region. "This was one of the first joint planned and executed ANP/ABP operations conducted in this area," said Belcher. "Taking this suspect off the streets will make life much safer for residents in the Chamkani area." The district sub-governor was impressed with the operation and praised the efforts of the ANSF to enhance security. ANSF and Coalition forces were also instrumental in removing another dangerous criminal from the streets in Kandahar Province in a second operation. The second individual, believed to be responsible for the IED strikes in Tsagay and Khakrez in November, was arrested by ANSF and Coalition forces Dec. 24. He is also suspected of being a leader of a cell responsible for placing IEDs in five other villages in the region. "Taliban extremists are deliberately forcing civilians into situations where they are either killed by the insurgents, or are at risk of being placed in harm’s way during ANSF security patrols," said Belcher. "This shows that insurgents don’t have any respect for the villagers in this area." For more news and information about CJTF-82, please visit: http://www.cjtf82.com For more news and information about NATO’s International Security Assistance Force - Afghanistan, please visit: http://www.nato.int/isaf/
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSecond Magnetoplasmadynamic Thruster WorkshopThe meeting focused on progress made in establishing performance and lifetime expectations of magnetoplasmadynamic (MPD) thrusters as functions of power, propellant, and design; models for the plasma flow and electrode components; viability and transportability of quasi-steady thruster testing; engineering requirements for high power, long life thrusters; and facilities and their requirements for performance and life testing.Document ID19930009446Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference ProceedingsDate AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1992Subject CategoryPlasma PhysicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CP-10109NAS 1.55:10109E-7369Accession Number93N18635Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-42-31Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930009446.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle19930009447WorkTransportation and platforms perspective19930009448WorkNear term NEP missions and systems19930009449WorkThe MPD thruster program at JPL19930009450WorkMPD thruster technology19930009451WorkLos Alamos research in nozzle based coaxial plasma thrusters19930009452WorkReview of recent work on MPD thrusters at MIT19930009453WorkMagnetoplasmadynamic thruster flows: Problems and progress19930009454WorkScaling and applied field studies of MPD thrusters with laser diagnostics19930009455WorkOL-AC Phillips Laboratory MPD thruster research program19930009456WorkRecent advances in MPD thruster research at Princetonvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
-----Original Message----- 

From: Betsy S Kramer [mailto:betsykinga@gmail.com] 

Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 10:14 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 

Are you crazy? NO, NO, NO!!! Please do not even consider this measure. 

Betsy Kramer 

A concerned Georgia citizen