CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: SJVUAPCD

Rule No(s): 4605 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Amended June 16, 2011

Rule Title(s): Aerospace Assembly and Component Co ating Operations

Date Submitted to ARB: June 30, 2011

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): October 20, 2007

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Koshoua Thao Phone Number: 559-230-6100 E-mail Address: koshoua.thao@valleyair.org

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

Amendments to Rule 4605 would revise rule language to address the EPA limited approval limited disappr oval and

end the 18-month sanction clock associated with the ir action. Details of the proposed amendments to R ule 4605

are discussed in Section II of the final draft staf f report.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when imp lemented, will result in quantifiable changes in em issions. Attach reference(s) for emission

factor(s) and other information. Attach calculatio n sheet showing how the emission information provid ed below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Sourc e Category: 0.0

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissio ns: n/a Area Affected: SJV Air Basin

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) :

0.0CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measu re: 0.02 tpd

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the C ontrol Measure: 0

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): 0

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): 0

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluati on Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emis sion forecasting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Source s Affected by this Amendment: 12

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100 %

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: n/a Percent in Nonattainment Area: n/a %

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : n/a

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Cont inuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) 5.0 Table 1 of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Re ductions are: no new methods

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): 5.0 Work Practice Standards in Section(s): 5.0

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): 6.0 Reporting Requirements in Section(s): 6.0CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 3

(Electronic Format)

5/1/2002 3

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: On January 16, 2010, EPA published in Federal Register Vol 75, No. 15 as 40 CRF Part 52 a limited approval

and limited disapproval of revisions to the Distric t portion of the California SIP. Section 5.0 and Se ction 6.0 of this rule are

amended to clarify rule requirements and add langua ge identified by EPA. Amendments will satisfy the EPA limited

disapproval and end the 18-month sanction clock.