alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|  | Water Quality Standards                                        Recent                                                                                Additions | Contact                                                                                Us |                                                                                Print                                                                                Version                                                                                Search:                                                                                EPA                                                                                Home > Water > Water                     Science > Water                     Quality Standards > Laws                     and Regulations > Fact Sheet: Proposed Oregon Water                     Quality Standards |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

||
||
# Exercise Alligator Dagger Cancelled

/ Published April 5, 2018

**DJIBOUTI --**U.S. air operations in Djibouti are on hold and U.S. Naval Forces Central Command has cancelled the remainder of exercise Alligator Dagger in response to two separate aviation incidents in Djibouti on April 3, 2018.First, an AV-8B Harrier from the 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) crashed at Djibouti Ambouli International Airport at approximately 4:10 p.m. local time. The pilot ejected and was evaluated and released by the expeditionary medical facility at Camp Lemonnier.In a separate incident, a Marine CH-53 Super Stallion helicopter from the 26th MEU suffered structural damage during a landing at an approved exercise landing zone at Arta Beach, Djibouti, at approximately 6:40 p.m. local time. The aircrew were not injured during the landing and the helicopter has remained at the landing site pending additional assessment.Alligator Dagger is a routine, scheduled training event involving U.S. personnel and operations in the vicinity of Djibouti and Arta Beach Range. Both incidents are currently under a joint investigation, and we will provide more information when able. A safety stand-down has been initiated for all exercise participants.Routine operations for other units assigned to U.S. Naval Forces Central Command are unaffected by this cancellation, and U.S. Naval personnel continue to conduct maritime security operations throughout the region.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

JOHN ROBERT ADAIR, DILJEET SINGH ATHWAL, and JOHN SPENCER EMTAGE, Appellants,

v.

PAUL J. CARTER and LEONARD G. PRESTA, Appellees.

____________________

2011-1378 (Interference No. 105,762)

_____________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals Interferences.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

D OREEN Y ATKO T RUJILLO , Cozen O’Connor, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, ar gued for appellants. With her on the brief was K YLE V OS S TRACHE

.

O LIVER R. A SHE , J R ., ASHE, P.C., of Reston, Virginia, argued for appellees. Of counsel on the brief were J EFFREY P. K USHAN and R ACHEL H. T OWNSEND , Sidley Austin, LLP, of Washington, DC.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (L INN , P ROST , and O’M ALLEY , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

February 9, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
## TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT:

ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM

FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS AND

COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT

DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMERS

April 201 3

U.S. Department of Energy

Assistant Secretary

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Building Technologies Program

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards

Washington, DC 20585This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy

by staff members of

Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

and

Navigant Consulting, Inc.
1210-AB32-2-1079.html[7/24/2015 5:11:11 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-qmbu

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1573

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Most citizens are smart enough to plan for their own retirement. The fact that we are contributing to a 401k

 program in the first place is a clue that we are thinking ahead. There should be no restrictions on how or where

 we spend the hard earned money that we have set aside for retirement. Please do us all a favor and do not enact

 regulations that give politicians in Washington any measure of control over our money.
#### § 601.1 Purpose.

This part describes the organization of the Federal Transit Administration (“FTA”), an operating administration within the U.S. Department of Transportation. This part also describes general responsibilities of the various offices of which FTA is comprised. In addition, this part describes the sources and locations of available FTA program information, and provides information regarding FTA's rulemaking procedures.
[Civ. No. 11536.

First Dist., Div. One.

Sept. 24, 1941.]

#### R. STANLEY DOLLAR, Respondent, v. HOMER H. TOOLEY, as Executor, etc., Appellant.

Byron Coleman, Abraham Setzer, George C. Hadley, Carl E. Day and Robert E. Hatch for Appellant.
§ 663.39 Post-delivery audit review. ( a ) If a recipient cannot complete a post-delivery audit because the recipient or its agent cannot certify Buy America compliance or that the rolling stock meets the purchaser's requirements specified in the contract, the rolling stock may be rejected and final acceptance by the recipient will not be required. The recipient may exercise any legal rights it has under the contract or at law.
( b ) This provision does not preclude the recipient and manufacturer from agreeing to a conditional acceptance of rolling stock pending manufacturer's correction of deviations within a reasonable period of time.
#### Julia Ahrens et al., appellees, v. Lincoln G. Simon, appellant: B. A. Jones et al., appellees.

Filed November 3, 1917.

No. 19598.

1. Trusts: Resulting Trust. Where two persons enter into an agreement to purchase real estate, and each contributes one-half of the purchase price, hut the title is taken in the name of one of the parties, a resulting trust immediately arises in favor of the other to the extent of his interest.

*7402. Evidence examined, and *held*sufficient to sustain the decree of the district court.

Appeal from the district court for Cheyenue county: Hanson M. Grimes, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*Hoagland & Hoagland*and *Stout, Bose <& Wells,*for appellant.

*Wilcox é Halligan*and *J. L. McIntosh, contra.*

Morrissey, G. J.

Plaintiffs, as the representatives of Milton Ahrens, deceased, instituted this proceeding in the district court for Cheyenne county for the purpose of establishing an undivided one-half interest in a quarter-section of land, which it is alleged had been purchased jointly by Milton Ahrens, now deceased, and the defendant, Lincoln G. Simon, and the title deed taken in the name of Simon, but for the benefit of both; The court entered a decree in favor of plaintiffs, and defendant has appealed.

There is little dispute between the parties as to the rule of law which would create a resulting trust, but they differ widely in the effect which they would give the evidence. Ahrens’ contribution to the purchase price is shown by oral testimony, by the books of the bank through which the deed passed, and by a check, of even date with the transaction, marked “Exhibit A,” and bearing a notation upon its face, claimed to be in the handwriting of Mr. Ahrens, showing that it was given in connection with the purchase of the land in controversy. The notation upon this check is denominated by appellant as a self-serving hearsay declaration, and we are urged for this reason to reject it. The cheeky was found with other canceled checks of Ahrens, in the bank against which it had been drawn, after the death of Ahrens, and the circumstances are such, plaintiff says, that we may assume that the notation was made at the time of the transaction, and before the check was presented for payment. The check is for the sum of $575.06. And this amount, added to other items of charge made by the bank *741through which the deal ivas had, foot' up exactly one-half the purchase price of the land.

The evidence is sufficient to sustain the decree without the notation on this check. Considering all the evidence including the admissions made by defendant himself there is no escape from the conclusion that Ahrens and Simon arranged to purchase this land, each to have an undivided one-half interest, and each to contribute one-half of the purchase price, and that, pursuant to this agreement, Mr. Ahfens contributed one-half of the cash payment at or before the delivery of the deed to Simon.

The decree is amply sustained, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

, Letton and Rose, JJ., not sitting.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Robert C. Bateman, Chief Financial Officer of Fisher Communications, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fisher Communications, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for theregistrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 10, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                         143,995
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,371,051
<ALLOWANCES>                                    25,000
<INVENTORY>                                 25,271,242
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,746,708
<PP&E>                                      37,783,917
<DEPRECIATION>                              21,038,717
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              49,076,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,072,361
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       743,088
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,527,515
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                49,076,049
<SALES>                                    156,445,451
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           156,445,451
<CGS>                                      134,544,521
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              150,668,152
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (359,785)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,399,984
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,737,100
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,710,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,027,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,027,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39

        

</TABLE>
#### § 375.603 When must I tender a shipment for delivery?

You must tender a shipment for delivery for an individual shipper on the agreed delivery date or within the period specified on the bill of lading. Upon the request or concurrence of the individual shipper, you may waive this requirement.
ISF clears pathway to Bayji Oil Refinery
 By CJTF - Operation Inherent Resolve News Release
  May 22, 2015 Release # 20150522FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **SOUTHWEST ASIA –** Iraqi Security Forces and Federal Police, enabled by the Coalition, have successfully cleared and established a ground route into the Bayji Oil Refinery.  Reinforcement and resupply of the ISF within the Refinery is on-going.  Ground forces, supported by Coalition airstrikes, reconnaissance, and advised and assist elements, maneuvered to clear through the area, establishing route security and reclaiming key terrain. “In the past 72 hours, we have seen the ISF make steady, measured progress in regaining some of the areas leading to the Bayji Oil Refinery despite the significant Daesh resistance in the form of IEDs, suicide vehicle borne IEDs, as well as heavy weapon and rocket fire attacks,” said Brig. Gen Thomas Weidley, Combined Joint Task Force – Operation Inherent Resolve chief of staff.  “In spite of the isolated nature of where the ISF have been operating and the constant threat from Daesh, creating a safe route to the refinery will allow supplies and reinforcements to arrive. This will assist Security Forces in clearing and securing contested areas in and around the refinery.” The Bayji Oil Refinery has been an ongoing target for ISIL terrorists, and the area around the Refinery has been contested for several months.  Since the liberation of Tikrit, ISIL has increased its attempts to force the withdrawal of the ISF at the refinery and surrounding areas.
Rockingham.

June, 1900.

#### Jackson, *Ex'r, v.*Piscataqua Savings Bank & *a.*

A bequest to a grandson of “certain books marked with Ms name ” will not include a bank-book so inscribed, when it appears that the deposit evidenced thereby was not intended as a gift, that other books were found which answered the description, and that other clauses of the will made substantial provision for the legatee.

Bill in Equity, praying that a deposit standing in the name of Nathaniel Jackson, Jr., be decreed to be a part of the testator’s estate.

Nathaniel Jackson, the testator, had a son Nathaniel, who died in 1876, leaving a son Nathaniel, who is one of the defendants. Between 1882 and 1887, the testator deposited money in the defendant bank, in the name of Nathaniel Jackson, Jr. He did not intend by so doing to make a gift, and retained the bank-book until his death in 1898. His son was known as Nathaniel Jackson, Jr., and after his decease the defendant Nathaniel was so knoAvn until 1883. The ninth clause of the will is as follows : “I give and bequeath to my grandson Nathaniel Jackson my watch, one revolver, one fowling-piece, and certain books marked with his name and in the house in which I reside.” The gun, watch, and revolver were of little value. Three books of no substantial value, marked “Nathaniel Jackson,1’’were found in the testator’s house. By other clauses, ho gave considerable property to the defendant Nathaniel, and a portion of the estate is not disposed of by the will.

The court ordered that the bank pay the deposit to the plaintiff, and the defendant Nathaniel excepted.

*Samuel W.*Emery, for the plaintiff.

*Page &*Bartlett, fox the defendants.

Peaslee, J.

The defendant Nathaniel claims that the deposit was given to him under the description “ certain books marked with his name,” but the evidence fails to sustain the claim. The clause in which this expression occurs is one by which the testator gave articles of no value except as family remembrances. It calls for books, not one book only; and if it should be held that this is a book, if does not answer the description, for the testator liad more than one in mind. The arguments that the testator must have intended to give something of value, and that the *284■will is to be so construed as to avoid intestacy, have little weight, for by other clauses he gave Nathaniel considerable property, and upon any construction of the will died intestate as to a portion of his estate.

*Exception overruled.*

Young, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
June 30, 1997 financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      10,750,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              104,785,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,609,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           126,104,000
<PP&E>                                      64,350,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              26,489,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             193,099,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       49,175,000
<BONDS>                                        750,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       173,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 140,041,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               193,099,000
<SALES>                                    202,605,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           203,011,000
<CGS>                                      126,403,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              177,467,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,123,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             24,421,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 9,906,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         14,515,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                14,515,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.87
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
12
 
 
 **COLUMBUS
SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES**
 **Computation
of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges**
 **(in
thousands except ratio data)**
 
 **Year
      Ended December 31,****2000**
    
    **2001**
    
    **2002**
    
    **2003**
    
    **2004****FIXED
      CHARGES**Interest
      on First Mortgage Bonds
    
    $
    40,602
    
    $
    34,575
    
    $
    17,756
    
    $
    7,079
    
    $
    279Interest
      on Other Long-term Debt
    
    
    25,878
    
    
    27,365
    
    
    32,762
    
    
    45,658
    
    
    52,301Interest
      on Short-term Debt
    
    
    2,412
    
    
    4,914
    
    
    3,244
    
    
    660
    
    
    799Miscellaneous
      Interest Charges
    
    
    14,205
    
    
    3,755
    
    
    2,585
    
    
    2,673
    
    
    5,864Estimated
      Interest Element in Lease Rentals
    
    
    5,300
    
    
    4,800
    
    
    3,500
    
    
    2,700
    
    
    2,500**Total
      Fixed Charges**
    
    $
    88,397
    
    $
    75,409
    
    $
    59,847
    
    $
    58,770
    
    $
    61,743**EARNINGS**Income
      Before Extraordinary Item and Cumulative Effect of
      Accounting Changes
    
    $
    120,202
    
    $
    191,900
    
    $
    181,173
    
    $
    173,147
    
    $
    140,258Plus
      Federal Income Taxes
    
    
    116,590
    
    
    94,148
    
    
    93,484
    
    
    78,391
    
    
    67,426Plus
      State Income Taxes
    
    
    136
    
    
    8,811
    
    
    17,519
    
    
    (4,729
    )
    
    245Plus
      Fixed Charges (as above)
    
    
    88,397
    
    
    75,409
    
    
    59,847
    
    
    58,770
    
    
    61,743**Total
      Earnings**
    
    $
    325,325
    
    $
    370,268
    
    $
    352,023
    
    $
    305,579
    
    $
    269,672**Ratio
      of Earnings to Fixed Charges**
    
    
    3.68
    
    
    4.91
    
    
    5.88
    
    
    5.19
    
    
    4.36