alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Coalition service members injured in hard landing

/ Published Sept. 29, 2017

September 29, 2017

Release # 20170929-04

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

****

**SOUTHWEST ASIA** – Two U.S. service members were injured after a Coalition aircraft executed a hard landing early morning Sept. 29 in the Middle East.

The two were evaluated for non-life threatening injuries and quickly transported to a medical treatment facility, where they were seen and released.

The other passengers and crew on the aircraft were uninjured, and no other casualties were reported on the ground.

The cause of the incident is being investigated by the Coalition.

-30-
Multilateral Maritime Engagement 24.1: Strengthening Regional Partnerships for Enhanced Stability
 
  By  Gunnery Sgt. Victor Mancilla
  **MANAMA, Bahrain -** Task Force 51/5th Marine Expeditionary Brigade (TF 51/5) is proud to announce Multilateral Maritime Engagement (MME) 24.1, a symposium aimed at fostering multilateral opportunities, partnerships, and capabilities within the United States Central Command (CENTCOM) Area of Responsibility (AOR).
MME 24.1 will take place from 21-22 February 2024 in Bahrain, where TF 51/5 will host military leaders from across the region to advance bilateral and multilateral partnerships. The symposium will serve as a platform for military leaders from Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, and the UK to engage in meaningful discussions about issues facing maritime security in the region, and to collaborate on strategic planning.
Brigadier General Matthew Reid, Commanding General of TF 51/5, said "The Multilateral Maritime Engagement 24.1 provides a unique opportunity for regional partners to come together and strengthen our collective capabilities. By sharing insights and expertise, we can enhance our response to dynamic crises and ensure stability in the region."
The symposium will feature seminars, capabilities briefs, static displays, and key leader engagements to facilitate productive discussions and collaborations among the participating nations. The goal is to plan military-to-military engagements in 2024 and 2025 that enhance interoperability in the maritime domain, validate the U.S. as the regional partner of choice, and advance CENTCOM security cooperation objectives.
TF 51/5, the integrated Navy, and Marine Corps amphibious force, is a Joint Task Force-Capable (JTF-C) Headquarters that plays a vital role in responding to crises and contingencies, coordinating, and executing operations, conducting theater security cooperation, and advancing emerging Naval concepts at sea, from the sea, and ashore in support of CENTCOM, Fifth Fleet, and U.S. Marine Corps Forces Central Command theater objectives.
Major General Christopher McPhillips, Commander of U.S. Marine Corps Forces Central Command, expressed his support for MME 24.1 by stating, "This conference is an important venue that enhances regional partnerships, interoperability and shared understanding. Working together in this way, we all demonstrate our commitment to peace and stability in the region.
Multilateral Maritime Engagement 24.1 signifies the commitment of TF 51/5 and its partners to work towards regional stability, enhance opportunities to build partnerships that can effectively respond to crises and contingencies. This conference serves as a testament to the dedication and cooperation among the participating nations, highlighting their shared goal of promoting regional stability and security in the maritime domain.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 3 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                       January 3, 2001.
    Resolved, That a committee of two Members be appointed by the Speaker on the 
part of the House of Representatives to join with a committee on the part of the 
Senate to notify the President of the United States that a quorum of each House 
has assembled and Congress is ready to receive any communication that he may be 
pleased to make.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 4.1


 


	
  NUMBER

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  SHARES

  
	
  C0

  	
   

  	
  INCORPORATED
  UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

  	
   

  



 


 


 


Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.


See
Reverse for


Certain
Definitions


50,000,000
SHARES PAR VALUE $.01 EACH


COMMON
STOCK


 


 


 


 


 


This is to
Certify that                                                                            
 is the
owner of


                                                                                                                                 


FULLY
PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF


Celldex
Therapeutics, Inc.


 


transferable
on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly
authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.


Witness, the seal of the Corporation
and the signatures of its duly authorized officers.


 


Dated


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  PRESIDENT

  	
   

  	
  SECRETARY

  



 


 

















 


                The
following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this
certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations:


 


	
  TEN COM

  	
   

  	
  -as tenants in common

  	
   

  	
  UNIF TRANSFERS MIN ACT-

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Custodian

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  (Cust)

  	
   

  	
  (Minor)

  
	
  TEN ENT

  	
   

  	
  -as tenants by the
  entireties

  	
   

  	
  under Uniform Transfers to
  Minors Act                                              

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  JT TEN

  	
   

  	
  -as joint tenants with
  right of survivorship and not as tenants in common

  	
   

  	
  (State)

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Additional abbreviations
  may also be used though not in the above list

  	
   

  	
   

  



 


 


For value
received                           
hereby sell, assign and transfer unto


 


 


	
  PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY
  OR OTHER

  IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF
  ASSIGNEE

  	
   

  
	
   

   

  	
   

  
	
   

   

  	
   

  
	
  (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING
  POSTAL ZIPCODE OF ASSIGNEE)

  
	
   

   

  	
   

  
	
   

   

  	
   

  
	
   

   

  	
   

  	
  Shares

  



represented
by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint


                                                                                                                 Attorney to transfer the said
Shares on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of
substitution in the premises.


 


	
  Dated

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  In
  presence of
# US moves carrier strike group to eastern Mediterranean

/ Published Oct. 8, 2023

Oct. 8, 2023

Release Number 20231008-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla. –**The United States has begun moving USS Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group to the Eastern Mediterranean. This includes the U.S. Navy aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78), the Ticonderoga-class guided missile cruiser USS Normandy (CG 60), as well as the Arleigh-Burke-class guided missile destroyers USS Thomas Hudner (DDG 116), USS Ramage (DDG 61), USS Carney (DDG 64), and USS Roosevelt (DDG 80). We have also taken steps to augment U.S. Air Force F-15, F-16, and A-10 fighter aircraft squadrons in the region. The U.S. maintains ready forces globally to further reinforce this posture if required. 

"USCENTCOM stands firmly with our Israeli and regional partners to address the risks of any party seeking to expand the conflict," said General Michael "Erik" Kurilla, Commander, U.S. Central Command.
# Coalition forces dismantle IED network in Zabul

/ Published Dec. 29, 2008

**FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
December 27, 2008                                                                                        

Release Number 20082712-01

**Coalition forces dismantle IED network in Zabul
KABUL, Afghanistan – Coalition forces detained five suspected Taliban militants, including the targeted militant, during an operation to dismantle the Taliban’s roadside bomb network in Zabul province, Friday.

In Qalat District, approximately 120 km northeast of Kandahar, Coalition forces netted a Taliban militant believed to facilitate attacks against Afghan and Coalition forces in Zabul province.  Intelligence also suggests the detained militant conducted and facilitated roadside bomb attacks along Highway One.

Coalition forces searched multiple compounds without incident, and detained five suspected militants while protecting 11 women and 20 children.

 “Maintaining the freedom of movement on Afghan Highways is important to both security and growth of the economy,” said Col. Jerry O’Hara, a U.S. Forces Afghanistan spokesperson.  “Roads also enable people between towns and villages to connect to one another.  It is that communication the Taliban fears the most.”

-30-

United States Forces Afghanistan’s mission, in coordination with NATO’s International Security Assistance Force, is to conduct operations to defeat terrorist networks and insurgents by developing effective governance and building the Afghan National Security Force.  Effective security throughout the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan facilitates continued regional stability and increases economic development for the people of Afghanistan.

Contact Information – US Forces Afghanistan Public Affairs Office

Tel +93 (0) 799 51 2919 or cell phone 0093 (0) 788 189 049

USFOR-A-MediaRelations@afghan.swa.army.mil****
# The Dwight D. Eisenhower Carrier Strike Group (IKECSG) arrived in the Middle East 

/ Published Nov. 4, 2023

**TAMPA, Fla. -** The Dwight D. Eisenhower Carrier Strike Group (IKECSG) arrived in the Middle East and CENTCOM area of responsibility as part of the increase in regional posture.

The strike group is commanded by Carrier Strike Group (CSG) 2 and comprised of flagship aircraft carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69), guided-missile cruiser USS Philippine Sea (CG 58), guided-missile destroyers USS Mason (DDG 87) and USS Gravely (DDG 107) of Destroyer Squadron (DESRON) 22, Carrier Air Wing (CVW) 3 with its nine squadrons, and the Information Warfare Commander.

- 30-
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-10045

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

VINCENT ROCHEL LEWIS,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:93-CR-29-15

- - - - - - - - - -

December 14, 1998

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Defendant-Appellant Vincent Rochel Lewis, federal prisoner #

60694-079, appeals the district court’s denial of his Fed. R.

Crim. P. 41(e) motion for return of property. Lewis seeks the

return of $135,000 in United States currency seized on May 15,

1993. Lewis argues that his right to due process was violated

because he received no notice or hearing of forfeiture.

Rule 41(e) provides a procedural vehicle for a property

owner to seek return of his property seized by the Government. 

See Industrias Cardoen, Ltda. v. United States, 983 F.2d 49, 51
2

(5th Cir. 1993). Rule 41(e) is a rule of criminal procedure,

however, and is not applicable to civil forfeiture proceedings. 

See United States v. Hernandez, 911 F.2d 981, 983 (5th Cir.

1990); Fed. R. Crim. P. 54(b)(5). We construe pro se pleadings

liberally as seeking the proper remedy. United States v.

Santora, 711 F.2d 41, 42 (5th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, Lewis’s

motion is construed as a civil complaint for the return of

property. See United States v. Robinson, 78 F.3d 172, 174 (5th

Cir. 1996). 

Lewis is not entitled to the return of the $135,000 because

he has not established that he had a lawful interest in the

currency that was seized. The district court did not err in

denying Lewis’s motion. 

AFFIRMED.
#### Lehigh Valley Coal Company, Respondent, v. Joseph K. Wells, Appellant.

Judgment roversed and new trial ordered, with co’sts to abide event, unless plaintiff shall stipulate to make deduction of $4.000, and take judgment only for balance, with interest, in which case judgment as reduced affirmed, without costs. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
----

(2004/C 88 E/0395)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2177/03

by Christopher Huhne (ELDR) to the Commission

(30 June 2003)

Subject:   Procurement

Will the Commission update its estimates of the proportion of the annual value of public contracts – broken down by capital and current spending – that are let to non-resident companies in each Member State?

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(4 August 2003)

In reply to the earlier written question E-0563/03 from the Honourable Member on public procurement (1), the Commission provided estimates of the value of direct and indirect intra-Community imports as a percentage of total procurement in 1998, provided by a business survey.

It also indicated that it was pursuing the possibility of incorporating this survey within the framework of the structural business statistics programme carried out by Eurostat together with the Member States' statistical institutes. Member States' statistical institutes have not proved willing to incorporate such a survey within this programme and the Commission is not so far in a position to update these estimates.

All the evidence suggests that within the Union public procurement market the number and value of direct imports, or public contracts let to non-resident companies, remains low, at a comparable level with earlier figures. Current work being undertaken for the Commission should provide some new data regarding cross border activity, prices, and the participation of small and mediu- sized enterprises in public procurement markets. For example, initial results of a recent pilot panel study of both suppliers to public authorities and public authorities themselves, undertaken for the Commission, suggests that indirect imports now account for an increased amount of overall public procurement at around 14 %. If confirmed, this would be a marked increase over the estimate of 8,5 % in 1998.

The preliminary results of this work, which still remain to be analysed in detail and confirmed, also suggest, that foreign owned subsidiaries, who are significant players in many public procurement markets, have had a rate of success in winning tenders comparable to that of domestic suppliers. The results also indicate a continued active interest on the part of Union firms in bidding for public procurement contracts in Member States other than their own.

The Commission will be happy to keep the Honourable Member informed of the final results of this work, which should be available by October 2003 in time to contribute to the annual report on the functioning of Community product and capital markets.

----

(1)OJ C 330 E, 21.11.2000.

----
EXHIBIT 32





Certification of Periodic Report


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to, and for purposes only of, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) the Quarterly Report of Shore Bancshares, Inc. on Form 10-Q, as amended on Form 10-Q/A, for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Shore Bancshares, Inc.





Date: November 14, 2011
By:
/s/ W. Moorhead VermilyeW. Moorhead VermilyeChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Date: November 14, 2011
By:
/s/ Susan E. LeavertonSusan E. Leaverton, CPATreasurer/Principal Accounting Officer
<PAGE>

                    TNP ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES          Exhibit 23
                    --------------------------------------



                   Consent of Independent Public Accountants
                   -----------------------------------------

The Board of Directors
TNP Enterprises, Inc.:

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our reports included in this Form 10-K, into TNP Enterprises,
Inc.'s previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File nos. 2-93265
and 33-58897) and Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-17835). It should
be noted that we have not audited any financial statements of the company
subsequent to December 31, 1999 or performed any audit procedures subsequent to
the date of our report.


                                              Arthur Andersen LLP


Fort Worth, Texas
February 16, 2000
MESA AIR GROUP 

410 North 44'" Street 

Suite 700 

Phoenix, AZ 85008 

Office (602) 685-4000 

Fax (602) 685-4350 

January 15, 2010 

<ZOD^ - 0'],x t 

M. Clay Mortiz, Jr. 

United States Department of Transportation 

Research and Technology Administration 

Bureau of Transportation Statistics, OAI, RTS-42 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, East Building, E34 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re.; Confidential Treatment Request for BTS Form 41 for Mesa Airlines, 

Inc.; BTS Form 298-C, Schedule F-1 for Air Midwest, Inc. and Freedom Airlines, 

Inc. (the "Forms") 

Dear Mr. M. Clay Mortiz, Jr., 

Please accept the following request in reference to the above listed Forms. As 

previously communicated to the Department of Transportation (the "Department"), 

Mesa Air Group, Inc's ("Mesa") fiscal year ends on September 30"^. As you l<now. 

Mesa along with its subsidiaries including the three airlines listed above file 

consolidated financial statements. All three of the airlines listed above have fiscal 

years ending on September 30*. 

Mesa is currently preparing its fourth quarter and year end financial statements 

and expects to file with the SEC no later than February 1, 2010. The infonnation 

contained In the Forms contains non-public Information that will be included in Mesa's 

SEC filings. Mesa Is providing to the Department unaudited financial information in the 

attached Forms and, if there are any changes, will resubmit updated financial 

information consistent with the final audited financials. 

Accordingly, Mesa requires that the Department keep the information provided in 

the Forms confidential and exclude It from any disclosures made pursuant to a 

Freedom of Information Act request or other request for information from any nongovernmental entity until after Mesa has filed its financial statements with the SEC that 

it expects to file as indicated above. 

If you need any additional information regarding this request, please do not 

hesitate to contact me at (602) 685-4052. 

Mi 

President
§ 599.513 Hearing procedures. ( a ) There is no right to discovery in any proceedings conducted pursuant to this subpart.
( b ) The material in the case file pertinent to the issues to be determined by the Hearing Officer is presented by the Chief Counsel or his or her designee.
( c ) The Chief Counsel may supplement the case file with information prior to the hearing. A copy of such information will be provided to the party no later than 3 days before the hearing.
( d ) At the close of the Chief Counsel's presentation of evidence, the party has the right to examine, respond to and rebut material in the case file and other information presented by the Chief Counsel.
( e ) In receiving evidence, the Hearing Officer is not bound by strict rules of evidence. In evaluating the evidence presented, the Hearing Officer must give due consideration to the reliability and relevance of each item of evidence.
( f ) A party may present the testimony of any witness either through a written statement or a personal appearance. If a party wishes to present testimony through a personal appearance, the party is responsible for obtaining that personal appearance, including any costs associated with such appearance. The Hearing Officer may, at his or her discretion, accept a stipulation in lieu of testimony.
( g ) At the close of the party's presentation of evidence, the Hearing Officer may allow the introduction of rebuttal evidence that may be presented by the Chief Counsel. The Hearing Officer may allow the party to respond to any such evidence submitted.
( h ) The Hearing Officer may take notice of matters which are subject to a high degree of indisputability and are commonly known in the community or are ascertainable from readily available sources of known accuracy. Prior to taking notice of a matter, the Hearing Officer shall give the party an opportunity to show why notice should not be taken. In any case in which notice is taken, the Hearing Officer places a written statement of the matters as to which notice was taken in the record, with the basis for such notice, including a statement that the party consented to notice being taken or a summary of the party's objections.
( i ) After the evidence in the case has been presented, the Chief Counsel and the party may present argument on the issues in the case. The party may also request an opportunity to submit a written statement for consideration by the Hearing Officer and for further review. If granted, the Hearing Officer shall allow a reasonable time for submission of the statement and shall specify the date by which it must be received. If the statement is not received within the time prescribed, or within the limits of any extension of time granted by the Hearing Officer, the Hearing Officer prepares the decision in the case.
( j ) A verbatim transcript of the hearing will not normally be prepared. A party may, solely at its own expense, cause a verbatim transcript to be made. If a verbatim transcript is made, the party shall submit two copies to the Hearing Officer not later than 15 days of the hearing. The Hearing Officer shall include such transcript in the record.
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 12:50 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

Please do not make annuities a requirement in 401k plans.  This does not make sense for

younger workers, and it will also require extensive regulating on the part of the annuity

providers now that they have a captured audience.   

ERISA is there to protect the plan participant, not punish him!

C. Raynes
#### John Aitken, Individually, and as Trustee, Appellant, *v.*Charles H. Young, as Executor of George Ferguson, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

*Aitken*v. *Young,*130 App. Div. 897, affirmed.

(Submitted October 28, 1910;

decided November 22, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 19, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to recover a surplus *502alleged to have remained from a sale on execution after satisfaction of judgment.

*John Aitken,*appellant, in person.

*Albert Ritchie*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Collin, JJ.