alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Denis Larmore, *Respondent, v.*The Crown Point Iron Company, Appellant.—

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Bockes, J.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6

                         INTERMOUNTAIN COMMUNITY BANCORP

                         DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

This Director Stock Option Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and
between Panhandle Bancorp ("Bancorp") and the Director, named below.

1.   Pursuant to Bancorp's Director Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") and subject
     to the terms of this Agreement, Bancorp hereby grants the following
     irrevocable incentive stock option ("Option"):

           Director: ____________________________________________________

           Option Shares: ________________________ Exercise Price: _____________

           Date of Grant: ________________________ Date of Termination: ________

         Vesting Schedule: This Option will become exercisable as to
         ___________(___) Shares on each of the first five (5) anniversary dates
         from the Date of Grant.


2.   Pursuant to this Option, the Director has the option to purchase the stated
     number of Option Shares of the common stock of Bank at the Exercise Price,
     payable on the date of exercise. This Option is granted as of the Date of
     Grant, and shall terminate on the Date of Termination unless sooner
     terminated by reason of death, disability or other termination of status as
     an director as provided in the Plan.

3.   This Option shall become exercisable according to the Vesting Schedule.
     Option Shares as to which this Option becomes exercisable are called
     "Vested Shares." This Option shall be exercisable as to Vested Shares in
     whole or in part at any time between the Date of Grant and the Date of
     Termination of this Option. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the
     Optionee's status as an director with Bancorp terminates, then this Option
     will cease to vest and will not become exercisable as to any additional
     shares, as of the date on which the Optionee's status as director
     terminates. In such case, this Option will be limited to the Vested Shares
     as of such date of the termination of status as director.

4.   This Option must be exercised by actual delivery to Bancorp of a written
     notice of exercise signed by Director specifying the number of shares with
     respect to which this Option is being exercised and the per-share Exercise
     Price, accompanied by payment of the full amount of the Exercise Price for
     the number of shares being purchased.

<PAGE>

5.   All terms and conditions of the Plan are hereby incorporated by this
     reference as a part of this Agreement, including but not limited to the
     "Terms and Conditions of Options" provided in the Plan.

DIRECTOR:                           INTERMOUNTAIN COMMUNITY
                                    BANCORP,
                                    an Idaho corporation

__________________________________       By: _______________________________

Print Name: ______________________       Title: President & CEO

I hereby acknowledge that I have received a copy of the Plan, incorporated by
reference above.

_________________________________
Director
Oregon Group Promotes Cultural Competency 

Closing the Gap, First Summit Packs the House • January/February 2003 

The Salud Primero Medical Access Project is meeting the challenge of improving access to health care for the Latino LEP (limited English proficiency) population in Lane County, 

Eugene, OR. Its goal is to increase both accessibility and utilization 

of health care and expand the linguistic and cultural competence and 

the capacity of providers. 

Salud Primero also addresses the health disparities among the 

Latino population for diabetes infection and HIV/AIDS transmission by focusing on preventive education in the community. 

Salud Primero is engaged in training community members to 

reach the Latino LEP community with culturally and linguistically 

appropriate diabetes and HIV/AIDS information and prevention 

materials. By providing free testing for diabetes and HIV through 

collaborative relationships, Salud Primero is striving to create a stronger treatment referral system for Latino diabetes and HIV/AIDS patients. 

Currently, Salud Primero is in the process of collecting data from 

providers, medical administrators, project staff, Latino participants, 

and medical records/service utilization databases. An evaluation 

team, working with the Oregon Social Learning Center (OSLC), will 

analyze the data and provide feedback. Demographic data collected 

will help researchers pinpoint problem areas for concentrated efforts. 

Salud Primero’s goals are: to decrease hospital emergency room 

utilization among the Latino population for diabetes and HIV; increase the number of providers with Spanish-speaking capability; 

increase access to health information for LEP Latinos; and improve 

Latino patient satisfaction with medical care in Lane County 

Oregon.

Office of Minority Health Resource Center U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23

                         Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated November 29,
1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Commercial Intertech Corp. and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended October 31, 1999, in the prospectus contained in the
following registration statements:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

 Registration
    Number                          Description                                              Filing Date
-------------       --------------------------------------------                        -----------------
<S>                 <C>                                                                 <C>
33-25795            Non-Qualified Stock Purchase Plan of
                           Commercial Intertech Corp. - Form S-8
                           Registration Statement                                       November 29, 1988

33-29980            Commercial Intertech Corp. Stock Option and
                           Award Plan of 1989 including Pre-Effective
                           Amendment No. 1 to Form S-8 Registration
                           Statement filed July 24, 1989                                July 10, 1989

33-43907            Commercial Intertech Corp. Retirement Stock
                           Ownership and Savings Plan - Form S-8
                           Registration Statement                                       November 13, 1991

33-52443            Commercial Intertech Corp. Stock Option
                           and Award Plan of 1993 - Form S-8
                           Registration Statement                                       February 28, 1994

33-61453            Commercial Intertech Corp. Stock Option
                           and Award Plan of 1995 - Form S-8
                           Registration Statement                                       August 1, 1995

333-28903           Commercial Intertech Corp. Non-Employee
                           Directors' Stock Plan - Form S-8
                           Registration Statement                                       June 10, 1997

333-41551           Commercial Intertech Corp. Non-Employee
                           Directors' Performance Share Plan - Form S-8
                           Registration Statement                                       December 5, 1997

</TABLE>

                              /s/Ernst & Young LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
January 21, 2000
#### Patrick Lynch, Respondent, *v.*John Peirce, Appellant.

*Lynch*v. *Peirce,*135 App. Div. 920, affirmed.

(Argued May 15, 1911;

decided May 30, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 31, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sus tained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant, his employer.

*Robert H. Ewell*and *George F. Harriman*for appellant.

*William J. Martin, Charles B. McLaughlin*and *John Conville*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
§ 7.22 Who administers this subpart? ( a ) A Chief FOIA Officer is appointed by the Secretary to oversee DOT's compliance with the Act pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(k). The DOT Chief FOIA Officer is designated at 49 CFR 1.27a as the Career Deputy General Counsel.
( b ) Each DOT FOIA Requester Service Center listed in § 7.27 is the initial point of contact for providing information about its processing of requests.
( c ) One or more Public Liaisons are designated by the Chief FOIA Officer for each DOT FOIA Requester Service Center listed in § 7.27. Public Liaisons assist requesters in reducing delays and resolving disputes, as described in 5 U.S.C. 552(k)(6).
( d ) Authority to administer this subpart and to issue determinations with respect to initial requests and appeals of initial denials has been delegated as follows: ( 1 ) To the General Counsel for the records of the Office of the Secretary by 49 CFR 1.27.
( 2 ) To the Inspector General for records of the Office of Inspector General by 49 CFR 1.74.
( 3 ) To the Administrator of each DOT Operating Administration for records of that component by 49 CFR 1.81.
( 4 ) Each responsible DOT official may redelegate the authority to issue final determinations of appeals of initial denials to that official's deputy or to not more than one other officer who reports directly to the official and who is located at the headquarters of that DOT component.
( 5 ) Any such final determination by an Administrator or an Administrator's designee (following an appeal of an initial denial) is subject to concurrence by the General Counsel or the General Counsel's designee, if the final determination is not to disclose a record or portion of a record under this part, or not to grant a request for a fee waiver or reduction.
( 6 ) The Inspector General or the Inspector General's designee must consult with the General Counsel or the General Counsel's designee before issuing a final determination following an appeal of an initial denial, if the final determination is not to disclose a record or portion of a record under this part, or not to grant a request for a fee waiver or reduction.
Hillsborough,

Dec., 1894.

#### Bartlett *v.*Blair.

This court will not decide whether, under s. 6, *art.*1 of the federal constitution, a member of congress in attendance at a session of the house to which he belongs is privileged from service of civil process made conformably to the laws of this state, in the absence of any adjudication of the question by the supreme court of the United States.

Assumpsit. Facts agreed. A copy of the writ, duly attested, was seasonably left at the usual abode of the defendant in Manchester in this county by a qualified officer. The defendant was then and still is a member of the national house of representatives. When the copy was served, he was in actual attendance at a special session of congress, and most of the time since has been in attendance at said session and at the regular session, in the discharge of his public duties. Counsel for the defendant appeared specially, and moved that the writ and service thereof be quashed and the case dismissed, on the ground that as a member of congress in attendance at a session of the house to which he belonged, the defendant was privileged from service of any civil process issued by any state court and returnable during the session of said house; that no valid service had been made upon him under the circumstances, and that the court had no jurisdiction.

*Samuel W.*Emery, for the plaintiff.

*Burleigh §• Adams,*for the defendant.

Blod&ett, J.

The question raised involves the construction of *s.*6, *art.*1 of the federal constitution, by which senators and representatives are privileged from arrest, except for treason, felony, and breach of the peace, during their attendance at the session of their respective houses, and in going to and returning from the same. This question being a federal one, it is not necessary, and would be useless, for us to form or express an opinion upon it; and in the absence of any adjudication by the supreme court of the United States extending the privilege to the ■service of a summons or like civil process, the motion is

*Denied,.*

All concurred.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 98-10591

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

ARTURO DAVID VALLEZ, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

consolidated with

__________________________

No. 98-10619

__________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

ALFONZO GOMEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(2:97-CR-041)

February 8, 1999

Before GARWOOD, DAVIS and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

After reviewing the record in this case and considering the

briefs and argument of counsel, we agree with the district court

that the police had reasonable suspicion to stop appellants Gomez

and Vallez. We are also persuaded that the district court did not
2

err in finding that appellants consented to the search. The

judgment of conviction is therefore

AFFIRMED.
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Persons Who Commit, Threaten To Commit, or Support Terrorism

On September 23, 2001, by Executive Order 13224, I declared a national emergency with respect to persons who commit, threaten to commit, or support terrorism, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706). I took this action to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States constituted by the grave acts of terrorism and threats of terrorism committed by foreign terrorists, including the terrorist attacks in New York, in Pennsylvania, and against the Pentagon committed on September 11, 2001, and the continuing and immediate threat of further attacks against United States nationals or the United States. Because the actions of these persons who commit, threaten to commit, or support terrorism continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the United States, the national emergency declared on September 23, 2001, and the measures adopted on that date to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond September 23, 2007. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to persons who commit, threaten to commit, or support terrorism.

                        This notice shall be published in the                         **Federal Register**                         and transmitted to the Congress.                     

[FR Doc. 07-4720

Billing code 3195-01-P
§ 38.71 General. ( a ) New, used and remanufactured light rail vehicles, to be considered accessible by regulations in part 37 of this title shall comply with this subpart.
( b ) ( 1 ) Vehicles intended to be operated solely in light rail systems confined entirely to a dedicated right-of-way, and for which all stations or stops are designed and constructed for revenue service after the effective date of standards for design and construction in §§ 37.21 and 37.23 of this title shall provide level boarding and shall comply with §§ 38.73(d)(1) and 38.85 of this part.
( 2 ) Vehicles designed for, and operated on, pedestrian malls, city streets, or other areas where level boarding is not practicable shall provide wayside or car-borne lifts, mini-high platforms, or other means of access in compliance with § 38.83 (b) or (c) of this part.
( c ) If portions of the vehicle are modified in a way that affects or could affect accessibility, each such portion shall comply, to the extent practicable, with the applicable provisions of this subpart. This provision does not require that inaccessible vehicles be retrofitted with lifts, ramps or other boarding devices.
( d ) Existing vehicles retrofitted to comply with the “one-car-per-train rule” at § 37.93 of this title shall comply with § 38.75, § 38.77(c), § 38.79(a) and § 38.83(a) of this part and shall have, in new and key stations, at least one door which complies with §§ 38.73 (a)(1), (b) and (d) of this part. Vehicles previously designed and manufactured in accordance with the accessibility requirements of part 609 of this title or the Secretary of Transportation regulations implementing section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 that were in effect before October 7, 1991, and which can be entered and used from stations in which they are to be operated, may be used to satisfy the requirements of § 37.93 of this title.
#### Ben O. Gore, Appellant, *v.*The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent.

*Gore*v. *N. Y. C.*& *H. R. R. R. Co.,*136 App. Div. 909, affirmed.

(Argued April 4, 1911;

decided April 25, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 17, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term in an action to recover damages for sickness of plaintiff alleged to have resulted from the failure of defendant to properly heat its cars.

*Merwin W. Lay*for appellant.

*Samuel M. Havens*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hisoook, Chase and Collin, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1



Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer







I, Roy Dalene, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Hamptons Luxury Homes, Inc.



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and



c)

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls.



6.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: May 15, 2006



/s/ Roy Dalene

Roy Dalene

Chief Executive Officer
-----Original Message----- 

From: Bragg, R. Mitchell [mailto:RMBRAGG@southernco.com] 

Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 2:50 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: My 401K and or IRA. 

 The government has clearly shown time and time again that they 

have no idea of how to take care of its 

 Citizens. And it clearly showns that the citizens have a better 

understanding of how to run THEIR 

 Lives than the government does. This is nothing but stealing in 

the care of the government. 

 This, if passed could very well be what is needed for the 

citizens to rise up against a corrupt 

 Government and completely remove it from power, by force if 

need be.
# CENTCOM Confirms ISIS Senior Leader killed in a Helicopter Raid in Northern Syria

/ Published April 17, 2023

Apr. 17, 2023

Release Number 20230417-02

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla.** – Early this morning, U.S. Central Command forces killed Abd-al-Hadi Mahmud al-Haji Ali, a senior ISIS Syria leader and operational planner responsible for planning terror attacks in the Middle East and Europe. This was the ISIS leader who was killed in a previously announced unilateral helicopter raid in northern Syria today. Abd-al-Hadi Mahmud al-Haji Ali was the primary target of the raid.

This operation was launched after intelligence revealed an ISIS plot to kidnap officials abroad as leverage for ISIS initiatives.

“We know ISIS retains the desire to strike beyond the Middle East, said Col. Joe Buccino, a CENTCOM spokesperson. “This raid deals a significant blow to ISIS operations in the region but does not eliminate ISIS’ capability to conduct operations.”

-30-