alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| Journal officielde l'Union européenne | ISSN 1725-2431C 140A**47e année****20 mai 2004** |
| --- | --- |

Journal officielde l'Union européenne

ISSN 1725-2431C 140A**47e année****20 mai 2004**

| Édition de langue française | | Communications et informations | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| |
| Numéro d'information | Sommaire | Page | |
| | | I *Communications*. . . . . .II *Actes préparatoires*. . . . . .III *Informations* | |
| | | **Parlement européen** |
| | Avis au lecteur | 1 |
| 2004/C 140 A/01 | Guide à l'attention des candidats à des avis de recrutement organisés par le Parlement européen | 3 |
| 2004/C 140 A/02 | Avis aux candidats ayant accès à ce texte par voie électronique | 13 |
| 2004/C 140 A/03 | Avis de recrutement PE/89/S pour diplômés de niveau universitaire | 14 |

Édition de langue française

Communications et informations

---

Numéro d'information

Sommaire

Page

I *Communications*

. . . . . .

---

II *Actes préparatoires*

. . . . . .

---

III *Informations*

**Parlement européen**

Avis au lecteur

1

2004/C 140 A/01

Guide à l'attention des candidats à des avis de recrutement organisés par le Parlement européen

3

2004/C 140 A/02

Avis aux candidats ayant accès à ce texte par voie électronique

13

2004/C 140 A/03

Avis de recrutement PE/89/S pour diplômés de niveau universitaire

14

**FR**
From: Grigg, Marcella @ New York [mailto:Marcella.Grigg@cbre.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 5:31 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule

February 9, 2011

By email delivery  

Office of Regulations and Interpretations

Employee Benefits Security Administration

Attn: Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule

Room N‐5655

U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20210

Ladies and Gentlemen:

I am pleased to submit this comment letter on the Department’s proposed regulation (the

“Proposed Rule”) regarding the term “fiduciary” under the Employee Retirement Income

Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”).

I am a commercial real estate broker who is employed by a full service commercial real estate

company that offers a variety of services to our clients.  I am concerned about the implications  

the Proposed Rule will have on my firm’s business practices.   First, as a investment sales broker,

my team often acts as an investment advisor for benefit plans with interests in real estate.  It is

likely under the Proposed Rule that such advice will be treated as fiduciary advice.  As such, we

will be required to institute new methods of tracking the various and numerous relationships

our firm has with benefit plans.  This will present a significant operational challenge because

tracking “plan assets” based on ERISA’s  “significant participant” or “25%” test is particularly

difficult due to the indirect manner in which benefit plans often invest in real estate (i.e. forming

Special Purpose Entities for holding the asset).   Additionally, our firm frequently “cross sells”

services to other business lines within our company, a practice which can often result in

significant cost savings and other efficiencies.   Under the Proposed Rule’s “first service in”, this

practice would preclude a benefit plan from utilizing any other service within the company, even

wholly independent lines of businesses who could offer the most economical option.  I do not

believe the intent of the Department is to preclude a benefit plan from open market

opportunities and the ability to utilize the services of world class full service real estate firms.

Thank you for taking the time to consider my comment.

Respectfully,

Marcella Grigg  
Marcella Grigg | Vice President Investment Properties | Institutional Group CB Richard Ellis | Capital Markets 

200 Park Avenue, 17th Floor | New York, NY 10166 T 212.984.6555 | F 212.984.6660 marcella.grigg@cbre.com | www.cbre.com
#### John E. Middaugh, Respondent, v. David Breen, Appellant.

Order affirmed. Opinion by

Bradley, J.
#### Frank Williams, Respondent, *v.*Citizens’ Steamboat Company of Troy, Appellant.

*Williams*v. *Citizens Steamboat Co.,*134 App. Div. 991, affirmed.

(Argued May 8, 1911;

decided May 30, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 11,1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant, his employer.

*Murray Downs*for appellant.

*Andrew J. Nellis*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Chase and Collin, JJ, Absent; Hisoook,' J.
IV

House Calendar No. 1

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 36

[Report No. 107–1]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 554) to establish a program,

coordinated by the National Transportation Safety Board, of assistance

to families of passengers involved in rail passenger accidents.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 13, 2001

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 554) to establish

a program, coordinated by the National Transportation

Safety Board, of assistance to families of passengers

involved in rail passenger accidents.

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of

3 rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 554) to establish a program, coordi6 nated by the National Transportation Safety Board, of as-
2

HRES 36 RH

1 sistance to families of passengers involved in rail pas2 senger accidents. The first reading of the bill shall be dis3 pensed with. General debate shall be confined to the bill

4 and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and con5 trolled by the chairman and ranking minority member of

6 the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

7 After general debate the bill shall be considered for

8 amendment under the five-minute rule. Each section of

9 the bill shall be considered as read. During consideration

10 of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee

11 of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the

12 basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has

13 caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional

14 Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule

15 XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as

16 read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for

17 amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill

18 to the House with such amendments as may have been

19 adopted. The previous question shall be considered as or20 dered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage

21 without intervening motion except one motion to recommit

22 with or without instructions.

House Calendar No. 1

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 36

[Report No. 107–1]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 554)

to establish a program, coordinated by the National Transportation Safety Board, of assistanceto families of passengers involved in rail passenger accidents.

FEBRUARY 13, 2001

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBC) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Todd D. Fanning, Senior Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer of PNBC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of PNBC.




/s/ Todd D, FanningTodd D, FanningSenior Vice-President  &  Chief Financial OfficerAugust 11, 2008




---
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Business and Economy    >Retail - Monthly    >Release Schedule
 Skip to looking for section Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  Release Dates for 2023/2024 **Advance Monthly Retail Trade Report** **Data Month**
			**Release Date at 8:30 am**September 2023
			October 17, 2023October 2023
			November 15, 2023November 2023
			December 14, 2023December 2023
			January 17, 2024January 2024
			February 15, 2024February 2024
			March 14, 2024March 2024
			April 15, 2024April 2024
			May 15, 2024May 2024
			June 18, 2024June 2024
			July 16, 2024July 2024
			August 15, 2024August 2024
			September 17, 2024September 2024
			October 17, 2024October 2024
			November 15, 2024November 2024
			December 17, 2024December 2024
			To be announced at a later date Excel
 **Monthly Retail Trade Report** **Data Month**
			**Release Date at 8:30 am for sales and
			10:00 am for inventories**August 2023
			October 17, 2023September 2023
			November 15, 2023October 2023
			December 14, 2023November 2023
			January 17, 2024December 2023
			February 15, 2024January 2024
			March 14, 2024February 2024
			April 15, 2024March 2024
			May 15, 2024April 2024
			June 18, 2024May 2024
			July 16, 2024June 2024
			August 15, 2024July 2024
			September 17, 2024August 2024
			October 17, 2024September 2024
			November 15, 2024October 2024
			December 17, 2024November 2024
			To be announced at a later dateDecember 2024
			To be announced at a later date Excel
 **Quarterly Retail E-Commerce Report** **Quarter**
			**Release Date at 10 am**3rd Quarter 2023
			November 17, 20234th Quarter 2023
			February 20, 20241st Quarter 2024
			May 17, 20242nd Quarter 2024
			August 19, 20243rd Quarter 2024
			November 19, 2024 Excel


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 396 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 25, 2002.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 3231) to replace the Immigration and Naturalization Service with the 
Agency for Immigration Affairs, and for other purposes. The first reading of the 
bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the 
bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not 
exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary. After general debate the bill 
shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in 
order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the 
five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the 
Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill. The committee amendment in 
the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. All points of order 
against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived. No 
amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in 
order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying 
this resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the order printed in 
the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be 
considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report 
equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be 
subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the 
question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order 
against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the 
bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House 
with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate 
vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the 
bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to 
final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Hall of Fame coach visits CENTCOM
 
  By Marine Sgt. Jordan Belser, U.S. Central Command
  **MACDILL
AFB, Fla. (June 21, 2016) –** Former University of Notre Dame
and University of South Carolina head coach Lou Holtz spoke to service members
and government civilians at U.S. Central Command headquarters yesterday. In addition to his distinguished
coaching career, Holtz, 79, is well known for his motivational speeches based
on three pillars: do what’s right, do everything you can to the best of your
ability and show people you care. Holtz has great admiration and respect
for the troops and volunteered to visit CENTCOM to share his experiences and
lessons learned.  He believes the
challenges he faced as a football coach can translate to any career, including
the military. Holtz trained under the Army Reserve Officer Training Corps
(ROTC) while attending Kent State University, earning a commission as a field
artillery officer upon graduation. “I am a big believer in accountability and
responsibility, and I learned that from my time in the military,” Holtz said.
“There is never a wrong time to do the right thing, just like there is no right
time to do the wrong thing.” During his talk with the troops, and in
between nodding heads and spurts of raucous laughter from the audience, Holtz
delivered an assortment of humorous, but true words of wisdom and stories of problems
he faced that went well (or didn’t). All the while, the retired coach
maintained the importance of teamwork, goals and caring for others. “You’ve got to make a sincere attempt to
have the right goals to begin with, and then go after them with appropriate
effort,” Holtz said. “And remember that you can’t really achieve anything great
without the help of others.” Holtz then expanded on the importance of
teamwork in the military environment. “Our country has never faced greater
challenges than we have right now,” said Holtz. “We need that teamwork, and we
need to work together for that common cause. You can’t be at your best without
working together.” Holtz met with CENTCOM commander U.S.
Army Gen. Joseph L. Votel just before the speaking engagement. Votel briefed the retired coach on daily
life at the headquarters and what his goals are for the CENTCOM Area of
Responsibility. The two spoke also spoke about family, football and life in
general. After
the speech, Holtz spent time to take a picture with any service member who
wanted one, provided his contact information, and offered to autograph any
photograph taken that day.
#### Matthew Hale and another, Respondents, v. John Swinburne, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.
§ 655.3 Applicability. ( a ) Except as specifically excluded in paragraphs (b), and (c) of this section, this part applies to: ( 1 ) Each recipient and subrecipient receiving Federal assistance under 49 U.S.C. 5307, 5309, or 5311; and
( 2 ) Any contractor of a recipient or subrecipient of Federal assistance under 49 U.S.C. 5307, 5309, 5311.
( b ) A recipient operating a railroad regulated by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) shall follow 49 CFR Part 219 and § 655.83 for its railroad operations, and shall follow this part for its non-railroad operations, if any.
( c ) A recipient operating a ferryboat regulated by the United States Coast Guard (USCG) that satisfactorily complies with the testing requirements of 46 CFR Parts 4 and 16, and 33 CFR Part 95 shall be in concurrent compliance with the testing requirements of this part. This exception shall not apply to the provisions of section 655.45, or subparts G, or H of this part.
[66 FR 42002, Aug. 9, 2001, as amended at 71 FR 69198, Nov. 30, 2006; 78 FR 37993, June 25, 2013]
exv4w4



 








EXHIBIT 4.4




SUMMARY OF EMPLOYMENT ARRANGEMENTS

BETWEEN BAYER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

AND DR. RICHARD POTT


 


	 	 	 
	Term:

	 	Dr. Pott was appointed member of the Board of Management of the Company
by the Supervisory Board effective May 1, 2002. The term will expire on
April 30, 2007.






Compensation: The aggregate remuneration of Dr. Pott for 2003 is comprised of
the following elements:



Base salary: EUR 408,712. Dr. Pott also received remuneration in kind totaling
EUR 20,566 and consisting mainly of amounts such as the value assigned to the
use of a company car for taxation purposes.



Fixed supplement: EUR 63,870



Variable bonus: EUR 436,590
(determined by attainment of the group gross cash flow
target)



Stock option rights: Dr. Pott received a total of 6,450 option rights on the
basis of his own investments. The options from this tranche had an intrinsic
value of EUR 37,797 at the closing date (if they could have been exercised).



Retirement: The Company will pay Dr. Pott a monthly pension equal to 80 percent
of the last monthly base salary and fixed supplement received while in service.
These amounts are in addition to any amounts received as a result of his
participation in Bayer’s Employee Pension Plan (See Item 6). He will be
entitled to receive the pension upon completion of 30 years of services with
the Bayer group or 8 years of membership in the Executive Board of the Company.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00174

- CR

GILBERT SANTOS GARCIA JR.

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 25th District Court of Gonzales County , Texas Trial Cause No. 213

- 10

- CR

- S1

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed as modified

. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.
We further order this decision certified below for observance. February 20, 2014
#### § 585.51 Scope.

This subpart establishes requirements for manufacturers of new pneumatic tires for motor vehicles with a GVWR of 4,536 kg (10,000 lb) or less to respond to NHTSA inquiries, to submit reports, and to maintain records related to the reports, concerning the number of such tires that meet the requirements of Standard No. 139, *New pneumatic tires for light vehicles* (49 CFR 571.139).
#### Polydore Duclos v. William T. Cunningham.

Motion denied.
§ 1.305 Federal agency responsibilities. The head of each Federal agency that awards and administers Federal financial assistance subject to the guidance in this subtitle is responsible for: ( a ) Implementing the guidance in this subtitle;
( b ) Ensuring that the Federal agency complies with their implementation of the guidance;
( c ) Coordinating with the Council on Federal Financial Assistance, the Grants Quality Service Management Office, and other governance committees as appropriate; and
( d ) Performing other functions specified in this subtitle.
Exhibit 10.30
 First Amendment to the
 CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES CORPORATION
 SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN




---



##### 



First Amendment to the Chesapeake Utilities Corporation Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan
 Background Information
 A.
    
    The Plan was amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2009, to comply with the
requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code).
From and after January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2008, the Plan, to the extent not
grandfathered, was subject to and operated in accordance with a good faith interpretation of
Code Section 409A, including the use of any applicable transition rules in effect during such
period.
 B.
    
    The Internal Revenue Service, in Notice 2010-6, provided guidance regarding document drafting
failures and ambiguities that may be corrected or clarified without adverse tax implications.
 C.
    
    Chesapeake Utilities Corporation, as the Plans sponsor, desires to make certain clarifying
amendments to the Plan to ensure its interpretation and operation continue in accordance with
the requirements of Code Section 409A, as permitted by Section IV of Notice 2010-6.
 Amendment
  1.
    
    Article IV of the Plan, Termination of Employment, is hereby amended by the addition of new
Section 4.3 to read as follows:
 General Limitations




---



##### 



2.
    
    Section 6.5 of the Plan, Benefit Claims Procedure, is hereby amended by the addition of the
following at the end thereof:
  CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES CORPORATIONBy:Its:Date:
§ 585.36 Reporting Requirements. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 67886 , Aug. 22, 2024.
( a ) *Phase-in reporting requirements.* Within 60 days after the end of the production year ending August 31, 2010, each manufacturer shall submit a report to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration concerning its compliance with requirements of Standard No. 208 when using the child restraint systems specified in Appendix A-1 of that standard for its vehicles produced in that year. Each report shall provide the information specified in paragraph (b) of this section and in section 585.2 of this part.
( b ) *Phase-in report content* — ( 1 ) *Basis for phase-in production goals.* Each manufacturer shall provide the number of vehicles manufactured in the current production year, or, at the manufacturer's option, in each of the three previous production years. A new manufacturer that is, for the first time, manufacturing passenger cars, trucks, multipurpose passenger vehicles or buses for sale in the United States must report the number of passenger cars, trucks, multipurpose passenger vehicles or buses manufactured during the current production year.
( 2 ) *Production of complying vehicles.* Each manufacturer shall report on the number of vehicles that meet the requirements of Standard No. 208 when using the child restraint systems specified in Appendix A-1 of that standard.