alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Update on withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan June 22, 2021

/ Published June 22, 2021
TAMPA, Fla., 
June 22, 2021Release Number: 20210622-04FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASETAMPA, Fla. - U.S. Central Command provides the following update on the orderly and responsible withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan, as of 10 a.m. on June 21, 2021.Since the President's decision, the DoD has retrograded the equivalent of approximately 763 C-17 loads of material out of Afghanistan and have turned nearly 14,790 pieces of equipment to the Defense Logistics Agency for disposition. The 14,790 pieces of equipment comprise almost entirely federal excess personal property. Most of this equipment is not defensive articles or considered to be major equipment.Also, the U.S. has officially handed over six facilities to the Afghan Ministry of Defense. We anticipate additional transfers of bases and military assets in the future which will support the ANDSF/GIRoA as they work to stabilize and defend their nation.U.S. Central Command estimates that we have completed more than 50% of the entire retrograde process.NOTE: For operational security and to preserve force protection, we will not be updating the specific percentage of the exit process going forward.
1210-AB32-2-1257.html[7/24/2015 9:42:43 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvt-9hv2

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1752

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Ryan Weber

General Comment

I am tired of big government overstepping it's boudaries. I am a law abiding responsible citizen that is perfectly

 capable of making my own decisions and taking care of myself, I do not need you telling me how to save or how

 I can and can't spend my money.
From: Gill Abernathy [mailto:aberngi@msn.com] 

Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2015 11:44 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32 Fiduciary Duty

Mr. Thomas Perez,

PLEASE proceed with a requirement of fiduciary duty for all financial advisors.

I have personally witnessed (retrospectively) how Edward Dr. Jones salespeople took advantage 

of my parents trust in selling them inappropriate investments, specifically a highly risky real 

estate investment trust that subsequently lost ~98% of it’s value and an annuity purchased at 

age 79 (with early out penalties that prevent me from consolidating their accounts.)

My parents were high school graduates with 1 or 2 community college classes, both raised on 

farms and both working in factories/mill office. I’m sure they did not appreciate the risky 

nature of some of the investments they were steered to, nor did they understand the ways that 

Ed D. Jones did not invest all their money, but rather took their cut off the top, subtracting off 

big fees before the money was even invested. Who knows what behind the scenes bonuses 

were paid. They never had a computer, so not like they were aware of fines to Edward D. Jones 

for business misdeeds. The Jones representatives were very nice and attentive, holding free 

lunches and probably convinced themselves that they were acting solely in my parents 

interests. 

I am now power of attorney for my mother and can see how they steered them 

into mutual funds in the best interests of the Jones representatives (before I transferred their 

money to a fidicuiary duty certified financial planner). 

Ed D. Jones operates in many small towns with people with a high school education who stand 

on concrete for 8 to 12 hours a day in loud, hearing and joint damaging jobs. They work 

incredibly hard for their money. These people trust others and truly believe the advisor is 

acting in their best interest, on par with one’s doctor. To take advantage of this trust is simply 

wrong. I call it immoral as well. 

At the end of your career, this is something you can be very proud of doing- a fitting use of the 

power you have been given during this period of your life. 

Thank you,

Gill B. Abernathy

on behalf of relatives in Burke County, North Carolina
#### § 80.19 Reporting requirements.

At a minimum, any recipient of Federal credit assistance under this part shall submit an annual project performance report and audited financial statements to the DOT within no more than 180 days following the recipient's fiscal year-end for each year during which the recipient's obligation to the Federal Government remains in effect. The DOT may conduct periodic financial and compliance audits of the recipient of credit assistance, as determined necessary by the DOT. The specific credit agreement between the recipient of credit assistance and the DOT may contain additional reporting requirements.

[65 FR 44940, July 19, 2000]
DOCKET NO. FAA-2015-0789 (Duke Energy Business S

Specified sUAS Craft - Request for Additional Infor

No. Make Model Type Description 

1 DJI Inspire Rotorcraft (Quadcopter) VTOL, retractable gear 2 DJI S1000 Rotorcraft (Octocopter) VTOL, retractable gear 3 3DRobotics X8+ Rotorcraft (Quadcopter) VTOL, retractable gear 4 AeroVironment Shrike Rotorcraft (Quadcopter) VTOL, retractable gear 5 AeroVironment Puma Fixed-Wing Hand/Rail Launch 6 UAV Solutions Phoenix 60 Rotorcraft (Hexacopter) VTOL, retractable gear 7 Lockheed Martin Indago Rotorcraft (Quadcopter) VTOL, retractable gear 8 SenseFly eBee Fixed-wing Rear-mounted propeller, Hand L9 SenseFly eXom Rotorcraft (Quadcopter) VTOL 

10 Draganflyer X4ES Rotorcraft (Quadcopter) VTOL, retractable gear 11 Draganflyer X6 Rotorcraft (Tricopter) VTOL, retractable gear 12 Draganflyer Guardian Rotorcraft (Quadcopter) VTOL, retractable gear 13 Aeyron Skyranger Rotorcraft (Quadcopter) VTOL, retractable gear 14 Aerialtronics Zenith ATX8 Rotorcraft (Quadcopter) VTOL, retractable gear 15 Blade 350 Qx3 (AP Combo) Rotorcraft (Quadcopter) VTOL 

*Specified sUAS craft being provided in response to Request for Additional Information. Petitioner reques

based on these craft while continuing to evaluate Petitioner's broader reque

**All indicated weights are taken from publicly available specifications and are without payload except as 

provided only for reference and not by way of limita

 ***Weight includes the ION payload.

  Weight includes supplied WX (18.2 MP) cam

 ** ***Weight includes integrated payloads.

******Weight determined by subtracting take-off weight by max 

*******Includes CGO2 GB 1080p HD (AP Combo) pa

Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
32(a)








This
Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall
not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other
document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in
such filing.








Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title
18 of the United States Code








In
connection with the Annual Report of Columbus Southern Power Company (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K (the “Report”) for the year ended December 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael
G. Morris, the chief executive officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








/s/ Michael G.
Morris


Michael
G. Morris


Chief
Executive Officer








February
26, 2010








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric
Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

______________________________

No. 00-30769

______________________________ EMMETT HYDE, Plaintiff - Appellee

VERSUS
STANLEY TOOLS, a Product Group of the Stanley Works, Defendant - Appellant

______________________________

No. 00-30959

______________________________
STANLEY TOOLS, a Product Group of the Stanley Works, Plaintiff - Appellant VERSUS
MADISON MILL, INC., Defendant - Appellee

___________________________________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (98-CV-2757 & 00-CV-1023)

___________________________________________________ December 3, 2001* D istrict Judge of the Western District of Texas, sitting by

designation.

** P ursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. 2 Before JOL LY and PARKER, Circuit Judges, and SPARKS * , District Judge. PER CURIAM: ** AFFIRMED. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KURTAVIUS JERMON SMITH,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 206 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of December, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
§ 92.13 Request for hearing. ( a ) The employee shall be advised in the notification that a hearing may be requested by filing a written petition within 15 calendar days of receipt of the notification, addressed to the chief of the paying agency's accounting or finance office.
( b ) The petition shall state the grounds upon which the employee disputes the proposed collection of the alleged debt. The petition shall identify and explain with reasonable specificity the facts, evidence which, and witnesses who the employee believes support his or her position.
( c ) The timely filing of a petition for hearing shall stay any further collection proceedings. A decision by the administrative law judge or other hearing official (see § 92.5(j)) will be issued at the earliest practical date, but no later than 60 days after the filing of a petition for hearing, unless a delay is granted at the request of the employee.
§ 672.15 Evaluation of prior certification and training. ( a ) Designated personnel subject to this part may request that FTA evaluate safety training or certification previously obtained from another entity to determine if the training satisfies an applicable training requirement of this part.
( b ) Designated personnel must provide FTA with an official transcript or certificate of the training, a description of the curriculum and competencies obtained, and a brief statement detailing how the training or certification satisfies the applicable requirements of this part.
( c ) FTA will evaluate the submission and determine if a training requirement of this part may be waived. If a waiver is granted, designated personnel are responsible for completing all other applicable requirements of this part.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1377.html[7/23/2015 6:30:16 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvm-or8o

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1377

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

 Leave me, my 401k and my retirement alone. I'm tired of "big brother" dipping into every aspect of Americans

 lives. Start worrying about the homeless and the hungry and leave the rest of us alone.
**EXHIBIT
        32.01**
  CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
            connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment Number 2)
            of
            Colonial Commercial Corp. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31,
            2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
            hereof
            (the “Report”), I, William Pagano, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
            certify, pursuant to section 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to section
            906
            of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 1.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
  2.
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
  
 By: /s/
        William Pagano
 Name: William
        Pagano
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 Date:
            August 27, 2007
###### Editorial Note on Part 572

#### Editorial Notes:

1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 572.163 Neck assembly and test procedure.

The neck assembly is assembled and tested as specified in 49 CFR 572.123 (Subpart N).
###### Editorial Note on Part 801

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 801 appear at 86 FR 54641, Oct. 4, 2021.

#### § 801.41 Reports to Congress.

The NTSB submits its annual report to Congress, in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 1117. The report will be available on the NTSB's website at *https://www.ntsb.gov.* Interested parties may purchase the report from the U.S. Government Publishing Office or review it in the NTSB's electronic reading room. All other reports or comments to Congress will be available in the NTSB's electronic reading room.

[86 FR 74378, Dec. 30, 2021]
§ 6.31 Further proceedings. ( a ) Ordinarily, the determination of an award will be made on the basis of the written record. However, on request of either the applicant or agency counsel, or on his or her own initiative, the administrative law judge may order further proceedings, such as an informal conference, oral argument, additional written submissions or an evidentiary hearing. Such further proceedings shall be held only when necessary for full and fair resolution of the issues arising from the application, and shall be conducted as promptly as possible.
( b ) A request that the administrative law judge order further proceedings under this section shall specifically identify the information sought or the disputed issues and shall explain why the additional proceedings are necessary to resolve the issues.
```

[109th Congress Public Law 123]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ123.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 2542]]

Public Law 109-123
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
    567 Tompkins Avenue in Staten Island, New York, as the ``Vincent 
     Palladino Post Office''. <<NOTE: Dec. 1, 2005 -  [H.R. 2183]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 567 
Tompkins Avenue in Staten Island, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Vincent Palladino Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Vincent Palladino Post 
Office''.

    Approved December 1, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2183:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            July 13, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 18, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 577.10 Follow-up notification. ( a ) If, based on quarterly reports submitted pursuant to § 573.7 of this part or other available information, the Administrator decides that a notification of a safety-related defect of a noncompliance with a Federal motor vehicle safety standard sent by a manufacturer has not resulted in an adequate number of vehicles or items of equipment being returned for remedy, the Administrator may direct the manufacturer to send a follow-up notification in accordance with this section. The scope, timing, form, and content of such follow-up notification will be established by the Administrator, in consultation with the manufacturer, to maximize the number of owners, purchasers, and lessees who will present their vehicles or items of equipment for remedy.
( b ) The Administrator may consider the following factors in deciding whether or not to require a manufacturer to undertake a follow-up notification campaign: ( 1 ) The percentage of covered vehicles or items of equipment that have been presented for the remedy;
( 2 ) The amount of time that has elapsed since the prior notification(s);
( 3 ) The likelihood that a follow-up notification will increase the number of vehicles or items of equipment receiving the remedy;
( 4 ) The seriousness of the safety risk from the defect or noncompliance;
( 5 ) Whether the prior notification(s) undertaken by the manufacturer complied with the requirements of the statute and regulations; and
( 6 ) Such other factors as are consistent with the purpose of the statute.
( c ) A manufacturer shall be required to provide a follow-up notification under this section only with respect to vehicles or items of equipment that have not been returned for remedy pursuant to the prior notification(s).
( d ) Except where the Administrator determines otherwise, the follow-up notification shall be sent to the same categories of recipients that received the prior notification(s).
( e ) A follow-up notification must include: ( 1 ) A statement that identifies it as a follow-up to an earlier communication;
( 2 ) A statement urging the recipient to present the vehicle or item of equipment for remedy; and
( 3 ) Except as determined by the Administrator, the information required to be included in the initial notification.
( f ) The manufacturer shall mark the outside of each envelope in which it sends a follow-up notification in a manner which meets the requirements of § 577.5(a) of this part.
( g ) Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, the Administrator may authorize the use of other media besides first-class mail for a follow-up notification.
[60 FR 17272, Apr. 5, 1995, as amended at 68 FR 18142, Apr. 15, 2003]
EXHIBIT 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WidePoint Corporation on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve L. Komar, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



By: /s/ STEVE L. KOMAR
-------------------------------------------
Steve L. Komar,
Chief Executive Officer
# International Maritime Security Construct Main Planning Conference concludes aboard HMS Cardigan Bay 

/ Published Sept. 17, 2019

ARABIAN GULF - Representatives from member states of the International Maritime Security Construct (IMSC), along with representatives from 25 additional countries, gathered on September 16 for a Main Planning Conference aboard HMS Cardigan Bay (K630).

In light of recent threats to international shipping, representatives reaffirmed their nations’ continued commitment to safeguarding freedom of navigation in the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, the Red Sea, and the Straits of Hormuz and Bab al Mandeb, and discussed multinational efforts aimed at enhancing maritime security throughout key waterways in the region.

The IMSC is enabling nations to work cooperatively to promote the free flow of commerce, deter threats to shipping, and enhance maritime domain awareness and surveillance.

The IMSC Task Force is headquartered in Bahrain. Current members include the United Kingdom, Australia, the Kingdom of Bahrain, and the United States.
[Crim. No. 464.

Fourth Dist.

Aug. 14, 1941.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. JOHNNIE MANSER, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellant.

Earl Warren, Attorney General, and Frank Richards, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent.

MUNDO, J.,

*pro tem.*— The defendant was charged in an amended information with the offense of assault with a deadly weapon. He admitted three prior convictions of a felony. A jury found him guilty of the offense charged and he appeals from the judgment of conviction. The clerk’s and the reporter’s transcripts in the action were filed in the office of the clerk of this court on June 17, 1941, and the case was placed on the calendar for argument on August 12, 1941. No briefs have been filed and no appearance has been made for the defendant. The People moved to affirm the judgment under the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code. It is apparent that the motion must be granted. *(People*v. *Phillips,*38 Cal. App. (2d) 412 [101 Pac. (2d) 547].)

The judgment is affirmed.

Barnard, P. J., and Griffin, J., concurred.