# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

June 27, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00249

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.M.G ., A Child,

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013

- PA

- 01311 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant ’ s court

- appointed attorney has filed a brief and motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal

. See In re RR , No. 04

- 03

- 00096

- CV, 2003 WL 21157944 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio May 21, 2003, order) (holding that Anders procedures apply to appeals from orders terminating parental rights), disp. on merits , 2003 WL 22080522 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio Sept. 10, 2003, n o pet.) (mem. op.). Counsel certifies he has served copies of the brief and motion on appellant . However, although appellant’s counsel informed appellant of his right to review the record and file his own brief, he neither provided appellant with a copy of the record nor did he explain to appellant the procedure for obtaining the record. See Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, no pet. ); Bruns v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1996, no pet.).

This court h as long held that counsel must explain to appellant to procedure for obtaining the records. See Bruns , 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1). On June 25, 2014, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals held, in the context of a criminal case, that an attorney who files an Anders brief “must take concret e measures to initiate and facilitate the process of actuating his client’s right to review the appellate record, if that is what his client wishes.” Kelly v. State , No. PD

- 0207

- 13, 2014 WL 2865901 (Tex. Crim. App. June 25, 2014). To this end the court of criminal appeals held that counsel who files an Anders brief must notify his client that if he wishes to review the record, he should “immediately file a motion for pro se access to the appellate record with the applicable court of appeals. ” Id. Counsel should include in his notification to the client a form motion for this purpose, lacking only the appellant’s signature and date, and provide the mailing address for the applicable court of appeals. Id. Counsel should als o notify the court of appeals, in writing that he has notified appellant of his rights and provided the above

- described form. Id. We advise appellant’s counsel that the procedure outlines in Kelly should be followed not only in criminal cases, but in ter mination cases in which an Anders brief is filed.

In this case, the court has requested the clerk of this court send a hard copy of the entire record to appellant. If appellant desires to file a pro se brief, we ORDER that he do so on orbefore July 28, 2014

. We further order the motion to withdraw filed by appellant’s counsel is held in abeyance pending further order of the court. The State has filed a notice waiving its right to file a brief in this case unless appellant files a pro se brief. If appellant files a timely pro se brief, appellee may file a responsive brief no later than twenty days after appellant = s pro se brief is filed in this court.

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on app ellant and all counsel

.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 27th day of June, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court