alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-----Original Message----- 

From: Greg Stroud [mailto:gstroud@wamail.net] 

Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 12:09 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: 401K / Retirement plans 

I read with discust that your department is floating a plan to take 

away our 401K and decising what is best for us for life time savings. 

Please do not so this - it is our monry that we saved not the 

gevernments. 

 We have skimped and saved and went without during our working careers 

not to have the DOL jump in a take it all away. 

I was rasied by working class that grew up during the depression - I 

was told work hard for a pension, pay my SS and save and I will be just 

fine in retirement. 

The gevernment has already blew SS and I am counting on none. My 

company continues to try and eliminate the retiremtn after 32 years and 

the government does nothing. Now I undertand you want to take and 

manage my 

401 K and tell me how much I have to livbe on in retirement? NO WAY. 

If you want to chnage the rule on 401K - it is your choice - do not let 

us have tax defered. limit how much we can put in - do what ever you 

want to the rules but leave MY CASH alone! I earned it you did not. 

I saved it - you did not. I took the risks you did not. 

The government would run the funbds into the ground just like SS, 

Medicare, Medicaid. you have a proven track record of not being able 

to hendle any money. 

Greg Stroud 

gstroud@wamail.net
#### § 826.37 Decision.

The administrative law judge shall issue an initial decision on the application within 60 days after completion of proceedings on the application. The decision shall include written findings and conclusions on the applicant's eligibility and status as a prevailing party and an explanation of the reasons for any difference between the amount requested and the amount awarded. The decision shall also include, if at issue, findings on whether the agency's position was substantially justified, whether the applicant unduly protracted the proceedings, or whether special circumstances make an award unjust.
§ 383.141 General. ( a ) *Applicability.* This section applies to State agencies responsible for issuing hazardous materials endorsements for a CDL, and applicants for such endorsements.
( b ) *Prohibition.* A state may not issue, renew, upgrade, or transfer a hazardous material endorsement for a CDL to any individual authorizing that individual to operate a commercial motor vehicle transporting a hazardous material in commerce unless— ( 1 ) The Transportation Security Administration has determined that the individual does not pose a security risk warranting denial of the endorsement; or
( 2 ) The individual holds a valid TWIC.
( c ) *Individual notification.* At least 60 days prior to the expiration date of the CDL or hazardous materials endorsement, a State must notify the holder of a hazardous materials endorsement that the individual must pass a Transportation Security Administration security threat assessment process as part of any application for renewal of the hazardous materials endorsement. The notice must advise a driver that, in order to expedite the security screening process, he or she should file a renewal application as soon as possible, but not later than 30 days before the date of expiration of the endorsement. An individual who does not successfully complete the Transportation Security Administration security threat assessment process referenced in paragraph (b) of this section may not be issued a hazardous materials endorsement.
( d ) *Hazardous materials endorsement renewal cycle.* Each State must require that hazardous materials endorsements be renewed every 5 years or less so that individuals are subject to a Transportation Security Administration security screening requirement referenced in paragraph (b) of this section at least every 5 years.
[68 FR 24850, May 5, 2003, as amended at 68 FR 63033, Nov. 7, 2003; 69 FR 51393, Aug. 19, 2004; 70 FR 22271, Apr. 29, 2005; 77 FR 59825, Oct. 1, 2012; 84 FR 52034, Oct. 1, 2019]
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southampton Partners, Inc. ("the
Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Robert
A. Wilson, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                              By /s/ Robert A. Wilson
                              ---------------------
                              Robert A. Wilson
                              President, Chief Executive Officer and
                              Principal Financial Officer
§ 604.20 Effect of an advisory opinion. ( a ) An advisory opinion represents the formal position of FTA on a matter, and except as provided in § 604.25 of this subpart, obligates the agency to follow it until it is amended or revoked.
( b ) An advisory opinion may be used in administrative or court proceedings to illustrate acceptable and unacceptable procedures or standards, but not as a legal requirement and is limited to the factual circumstances described in the request for an advisory opinion. The Chief Counsel's advisory opinion shall not be binding upon a Presiding Official conducting a proceeding under subpart I of this part.
( c ) A statement made or advice provided by an FTA employee constitutes an advisory opinion only if it is issued in writing under this section. A statement or advice given by an FTA employee orally, or given in writing, but not under this section, is an informal communication that represents the best judgment of that employee at the time but does not constitute an advisory opinion, does not necessarily represent the formal position of FTA, and does not bind or otherwise obligate or commit the agency to the views expressed.
Exhibit 32.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Hampton's Luxury Homes, Inc..
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2001 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Frank Dalene, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
         of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Frank Dalene
Frank Dalene
Chief Financial Officer
May 27, 2005
EXHIBIT 11

Southampton Partners, Inc.

EPS Calculations for period December 31, 2000 to March 31, 2001

Basic                    ($.012)

Diluted                  ($.012)

EPS Calculations for period December 31, 2000 to September 30, 2001

Basic                    $.447

Diluted                  $.447

<PAGE>

Table 3

The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.

                                                                 9-MOS Ended
                                                             September 30, 2001
                                                             ------------------
Net Loss                                                         18,612,640
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses                                18,150
Total stockholders' equity                                       25,376,137
Primary Earnings Per Common Share                                    .447
Fully Diluted Earnings Per Common Share                              .447
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Monthly Wholesale Trade
 You are here: Census.gov › Business & Industry › Wholesale › Monthly › FAQs Skip top of page navigation
 Main
          About the Survey
          Get Forms
          Historical Data
          How the Survey is Collected
          Definitions
      FAQs
  Are you in a survey? Is this form legitimate?
    Get Help With Your Form Related Sites Business and Industry
    Annual Wholesale Trade
    Economic Census
    Economic Indicators
    E-Stats
                North American Industry Classification System
    Nonemployer Statistics
   Business Help Site
   Manufacturing & Trade Inventories & Sales
   Advance Economic Indicators
 FAQs  General FAQs
                Sample Revision FAQs
		Natural Disaster FAQs
    Why is the Monthly Wholesale Trade Survey conducted?  What is the North American Industry Classification 
                System (NAICS)? NAICS
 What are economic indicators?  What data are produced by the Monthly Wholesale 
                Trade Survey?  How are the data used?  Why aren't the latest Monthly Wholesale reports for 
                the current month? Release 
                Schedule
 What is sampling variability and how do I interpret it?  How do the Monthly Wholesale historic release files differ from the Monthly Wholesale
                                historic time series files? Current month preliminary estimates are added.
                        Prior month estimates are finalized.
 What steps does the Census Bureau undertake to ensure that confidential data are secure? Title 13
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
Exhibit
10.16


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1


To Employment Agreement
of


Stuart Benson


 


Reference is made
to that certain employment agreement dated as of November 20, 2002 between
Vital Living, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) and Stuart Benson (the
“Executive”).


 


The parties hereto
desire to amend the employment agreement (the “‘Agreement”) as follows:


 


The
first sentence of Paragraph 1(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:


 


Company hereby
engages Employee, and Employee hereby agrees to serve as Vice Chairman of the
Board of Directors and President, Treasurer and Secretary on the terms and
conditions of this Agreement.


 


This Amendment is
executed this
             day of
July, 2003.


 


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  Vital Living, Inc.

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Its:

  	
   

  	
   

  



 


Agreed to and Accepted:


 


 


	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Stuart Benson
#### Joseph Corl and another, Respondents, v. Harry Corl, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Boardman, J.;

Follett, J., not sitting.
1210-AB32-2-1616.html[7/26/2015 9:03:27 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jxy-ziyn

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2113

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

LOOK what they did to our SSI savings .
----

(2004/C 84 E/0417)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0311/04

by Erik Meijer (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(6 February 2004)

Subject:   Discontinuation of the activities of the rail freight company Ikea Rail within two years of its foundation and the status of the EU subsidy of EUR 500 000 awarded to this experiment

Sources: Op de Rails, No 2004-1, January 2004; Transport & Environment Bulletin, No 124, December 2003.

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(11 March 2004)

The subvention to IKEA Rail AB has been granted by the Commission under a funding programme for combined transport, the Pilot Actions for Combined Transport (PACT), based on Council Regulation (EC) No 2196/98 of 1 October 1998 concerning the granting of Community financial assistance for actions of an innovative nature to promote combined transport (1). Besides IKEA, many companies from all Member States have benefited from PACT funding. The PACT programme came to an end in 2001, and is now replaced by the Marco Polo Programme under Regulation (EC) No 1382/2003 of the Parliament and of the Council of 22 July 2003 on the granting of Community financial assistance to improve the environmental performance of the freight transport system (2).

IKEA Rail got the subvention to help it start this service, given the high risks of starting up a new intermodal service with its own traction and own responsibilities in today's European rail market. The problems and costs associated with the running of the service, especially the costs caused by the lack of interoperability between the different national rail systems, were much higher than anticipated. IKEA Rail therefore stopped operating the service, and the Commission was duly informed. The Commission contributed to the costs of the IKEA project in line with contractual obligations resulting from Regulation (EC) No 2196/98 and paid a total subsidy amounting to EUR 235 925,37.

The Commission is not of the opinion that the IKEA Rail experience has been ‘unhappy’. The IKEA Rail shuttle between Sweden and the Ruhr area in Germany was taken over by another private railway undertaking, ‘RAG Bahn und Hafen’, which operate the service now in collaboration with Intercontainer-Interfrigo. Thus, the IKEA Rail experience partly funded with Community money proved to be valuable as a significant volume of goods has been taken off the road and put on the railways.

Additionally, the IKEA project was essential to identify the problems of market entry and point to concrete solutions and actions to overcome them. The Commission will therefore, in the Marco Polo Programme, continue this kind of risk funding to companies willing to pioneer new solutions. Building on PACT experience, all projects funded through the Marco Polo Programme will be subject to rigorous evaluation concerning their commercial and financial soundness.

----

(1)OJ L 277, 14.10.1998.

(2)OJ L 196, 2.8.2003.

----
#### § 605.12 Use of project equipment.

No grantee or operator of project equipment shall engage in school bus operations using buses, facilities or equipment funded under the Acts. A grantee or operator may, however, use such buses, facilities and equipment for the transportation of school students, personnel and equipment in incidental charter bus operations. Such use of project equipment is subject to part 604 of Federal Mass Transit Regulations.
Infrared Spectrum of PMN Substance 2
# CENTCOM Commander Visit to Qatar Highlights Focus on “People, Partners, and Innovation”

/ Published Feb. 9, 2023

Feb. 09,2023

Release Number 20230209-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla.**– Continuing a multi-country visit to the Middle East, Gen. Michael “Erik” Kurilla, commander of U.S. Central Command, visited Qatar from February 8 to 9. During the visit, Kurilla and CENTCOM’s component commanders and senior staff met with Lt. Gen. (Pilot) Salem Bin Hamad Al-Nabit, Chief of Staff of Qatari Armed Forces, and the senior Qatari military commanders and staff. The leaders discussed the current security situation in the region and the growing partnership between CENTCOM and the Qatari Armed Forces.

The U.S. – Qatari military relationship, long critical to regional security and stability, dates to 1972, one year after the declaration of Qatari independence. The relationship strengthened 11 years later with the 1983 formation of CENTCOM. Qatar is now a strategic U.S. partner in the region. Last year President Biden declared Qatar a major non-NATO ally, a status granted to only 18 other countries. Now, the partnership continues to offer benefits to the Middle East.

“Qatar is a significant contributor to the Gulf and broader Middle East and our partnership is only expanding,” said Kurilla. “Consistent with CENTCOM’s focus on People, Partners, and Innovation, we are firmly committed to our partnerships throughout the region, to include our ironclad partnership with Qatar.”

While in Qatar, Kurilla also met with Task Force 99, the innovation task force based at Al Udeid Air Base. Task Force 99 personnel displayed their innovative approach to sensors and UAV technology.

Task Force 99 was established in October of last year to serve as the aerial complement to Task Force 59, CENTCOM’s maritime-based innovation task force, and Task Force 39, CENTCOM’s land-based innovation task force. Combined, these innovation task forces create a technology development ecosystem that allows increased awareness and faster decision-making across all domains and places cutting-edge tools in the hands of warfighters and decisionmakers.

-30-
Incorporation by Reference 

Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0926 

January 7, 2010 

The contents of the following dockets are hereby incorporated by reference into and are 

considered to be included in, contained in and to have been placed in Docket EPA-HQ-OAR2009-0926 (Carbon Dioxide Injection and Geologic Sequestration Reporting Rule): 

1) EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0508 (Greenhouse Gas Mandatory Reporting) 

2) EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0923 (Oil and Natural Gas Systems) 

3) EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0924 (Determination of Confidential Business Information) 

4) EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0925 (Corporate Parent and NAICS Code) 

Accessing dockets: 

Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically through 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA’s Docket Center, Public Reading Room, EPA West 

Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004. This Docket 

Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. 

The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone 

number for the Air Docket is (202) 566-1742.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsResearch into display sharing techniques for distributed computing environmentsThe X-based Display Sharing solution for distributed computing environments is described. The Display Sharing prototype includes the base functionality for telecast and display copy requirements. Since the prototype implementation is modular and the system design provided flexibility for the Mission Control Center Upgrade (MCCU) operational consideration, the prototype implementation can be the baseline for a production Display Sharing implementation. To facilitate the process the following discussions are presented: Theory of operation; System of architecture; Using the prototype; Software description; Research tools; Prototype evaluation; and Outstanding issues. The prototype is based on the concept of a dedicated central host performing the majority of the Display Sharing processing, allowing minimal impact on each individual workstation. Each workstation participating in Display Sharing hosts programs to facilitate the user's access to Display Sharing as host machine.Document ID19910009302Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsHugg, Steven B.*(Southwest Research Inst. San Antonio, TX, United States)*Fitzgerald, Paul F., Jr.*(Southwest Research Inst. San Antonio, TX, United States)*Rosson, Nina Y.*(Southwest Research Inst. San Antonio, TX, United States)*Johns, Stephen R.*(Southwest Research Inst. San Antonio, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 22, 1990Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:186570NASA-CR-186570Accession Number91N18615Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG9-370PROJECT: SWRI PROJ. 05-2922Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910009302.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# Insurgents Attack Near Hamid Karzai International Airport, Using Civilians as Shield and Cover

/ Published Sept. 27, 2017

**NEWS RELEASE**

**2017-09-27-01**

****

**KABUL, Afghanistan, September 27, 2017**– During a failed attack today, insurgents fired several rounds of high-explosive ammunition, including mortars, into the vicinity of Hamid Karzai International Airport and detonated suicide vests endangering a great number of civilians.

The Afghan Crisis Response Unit 222 responded quickly to confront the attackers and end the assault.  U.S. forces acting in support conducted an airstrike. Tragically, one of the missiles malfunctioned, causing several casualties.

Resolute Support deeply regrets the harm to non-combatants. We take every precaution to avoid civilian casualties, even as the enemies of Afghanistan continue to operate in locations that deliberately put civilians at very high risk.

An investigation into the attack and the malfunctioning ammunition has begun. More details about the attack will be made available in the days to follow. 

-30-
1210-AB32-2-1094.html[7/24/2015 5:44:51 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-azty

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1588

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: James Anonymous

Address: United States, 

General Comment

Do not act on my retirement plan instead give me my Ira and 403 cash without tax dedication been working

 45years watched penson go away over the years. Why has the Feds/State able to have when my tax pays for it.

 The dream is gone,thanks to those who make a lot of money and do not support the real people of theUSA