alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 575.7 Special vehicles.

A manufacturer who produces vehicles having a configuration not available for purchase by the general public need not make available to ineligible purchasers, pursuant to § 575.6(c), the information for those vehicles specified in subpart B of this part, and shall identify those vehicles when furnishing the information required by § 575.6(d).

[40 FR 11727, Mar. 13, 1975]
```

[109th Congress Public Law 143]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ143.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 2659]]

Public Law 109-143
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To reauthorize the Congressional Award Act. <<NOTE: Dec. 22, 2005 -  [S. 
                                 335]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE CONGRESSIONAL AWARD ACT.

    (a) Extension of Requirements Regarding Financial Operations of 
Congressional Award Program; Noncompliance With Requirements.--Section 
104(c)(2)(A) of the Congressional Award Act (2 U.S.C. 804(c)(2)(A)) is 
amended by striking ``and 2004'' and inserting ``2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 
2008, and 2009''.
    (b) Termination.--
            (1) In general.--Section 108 of the Congressional Award Act 
        (2 U.S.C. 808) is amended by striking ``October 1, 2004'' and 
        inserting ``October 1, 2009''.
            (2) <<NOTE: 2 USC 808 note.>> Savings provision.--During the 
        period of October 1, 2004, through the date of the enactment of 
        this section, all actions and functions of the Congressional 
        Award Board under the Congressional Award Act (2 U.S.C. 801 et 
        seq.) shall have the same effect as though no lapse or 
        termination of the Board ever occurred.

    (c) Technical Amendments.--The Congressional Award Act is amended--
            (1) in section 103 (2 U.S.C. 803)--
                    (A) in subsection (a)(1)(B) and (C), by striking ``a 
                a local'' and inserting ``a local''; and
                    (B) in subsection (b)(3)(B), by striking ``section'' 
                each place it appears and inserting ``subsection''; and
            (2) in section 104(c)(2)(A) (2 U.S.C. 804(c)(2)(A)), by 
        inserting a comma after ``1993''.

    Approved December 22, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 335:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

SENATE REPORTS: No. 109-87 (Comm. on Homeland Security and Governmental 
Affairs).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            July 14, considered and passed Senate.
            Dec. 14, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
From: Mark K [mailto:markkroe@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 11:17 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Please drop the proposed regulations around IRAs and conflicts of interest. They are unnecessary 

and will have far reaching consequences beyond their intent. My wife and I each have a Roth 

IRA and a traditional IRA and believe these rules will hinder our ability to invest freely and 

make the most of our retirement. Please let American citizens make their own decisions. We 

don't need or want to be protected from every possible danger.

Thank you,

Mark & Linda Kroenke

923 Camphor Cir

Newbury Park, CA 91320
Exhibit 10.52



AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE

TO THE

EXELON CORPORATION

DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN



The Exelon Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 2001 (the Plan), is hereby amended, effective as of January 1, 2004,
in the following respects:



|1. | Section 4.4 is amended in its entirety to provide as follows:
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------



4.4 Severance Benefit Elections. An individual who is an Eligible Employee with respect to a Plan Year and who becomes entitled to benefits
under the Exelon Corporation Senior Management Severance Plan or another severance plan or other agreement with the Company then in effect with respect to such individual, shall defer the portion of such severance benefits representing base salary
and annual incentive award in the manner (if any) provided in the applicable plan or agreement.



|2. | The first sentence of Section 4.7 is amended in its entirety to provide as follows:
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



An election under this Article IV with respect to any Plan Year shall become irrevocable on December 31 of the
preceding Plan Year; provided, however, that a Participant may, to the extent permitted by the Plan Administrator, change his or her election with respect to the deferral of base salary under Section 4.2 during the Plan Year with respect to which it
applies, but any such change shall be effective solely with respect to base salary earned after the effective date of such change.



|3. | The first sentence of Section 6.2 is amended in its entirety to provide as follows:
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Except as otherwise provided in Section 6.3 or Section 6.4, the balance of a Participants accounts hereunder
shall be paid or commence to be paid in accordance with the Section 6.1 commencing in the calendar quarter immediately following the first full calendar quarter to occur after the Participants termination of employment or, to the extent
permitted by rules established by the Plan Administrator, April of the calendar year after the calendar year in which the Participant terminates employment.





---

Executed effective as of January 1, 2004.



EXELON CORPORATIONBy:

/S/    S. GARY
SNODGRASSS. Gary SnodgrassExecutive Vice President andChief Administrative Officer




2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ENERGY-
NORTH, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFER-
ENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       88,914<F1>
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      8,017<F2>
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          26,088
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         6,913
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,932
<COMMON>                                         3,208
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       29,782
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             12,158
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  45,148
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            29,745
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               6,810
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    3,438
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                        206
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   256
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  44,329
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  129,932
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       25,976
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             2,152
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      19,171
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      21,323
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          4,653
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 249
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   4,902
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         1,151
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,751
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    3,751
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           928
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        2,721<F3>
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         (2,595)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $1.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.00
<FN>
<F1>NET OF ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION OF $42,320.
<F2>NET OF ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION OF $7,668.
<F3>$2,721 REPRESENTS THE FORECASTED ANNUAL INTEREST ON BONDS FOR THE FISCAL 
YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1996.  ACTUAL INTEREST ON BONDS FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 WAS $691.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001034760
<NAME> ZMAX CORPORATION

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,511,466
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,035,724
<PP&E>                                         336,713
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,777
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,671,445
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,157,884
<BONDS>                                      5,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,450
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,111
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,671,445
<SALES>                                        512,041
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               512,041
<CGS>                                          283,332
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  283,332
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,597,209
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,228,695
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,597,195)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,597,195)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,597,195)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.10)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fisher Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I William W. Krippaehne Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





|(1) |  | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Dated:  August 14, 2002





/s/    William W. Krippaehne Jr.William W. Krippaehne Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 160 (Monday, August 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 46532]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4039]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision

[AC-13: OTS Nos. 15220 and H-4426]

Beacon Federal, East Syracuse, NY, and Beacon Federal Bancorp., 
Inc., East Syracuse, NY; Approval of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on August 10, 2007, the Office of 
Thrift Supervision approved the application of Beacon Federal, East 
Syracuse, New York, to convert to the stock form of organization. 
Copies of the application are available for inspection by appointment 
(phone number: 202-906-5922 or e-mail: [email protected]) at 
the Public Reading Room, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552, and 
the OTS Northeast Regional Office, Harborside Financial Center, Plaza 
Five, Suite 1600, Jersey City, New Jersey 07311.

    Dated: August 14, 2007.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Sandra E. Evans,
Legal Information Assistant.
[FR Doc. 07-4039 Filed 8-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         August 24, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on August 15, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 28 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2023-232, CP2023-235.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-18207 Filed 8-23-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### Daniel Carroll, Jr., *Respondent, v.*James Lee, *Appellant.*

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to abide event., Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
**Exhibit 24.11**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

**KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS** that I, **Thomas J. Ridge** do hereby appoint John W.Rowe and William A. Von Hoene, Jr., or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2008 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, tobe filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present. 

**Thomas J. Ridge**

**DATE: February 2, 2009**
Oct. 28: Military airstrikes continue against ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq
 By CJTF-OIR Pubilc Affairs
  October 28, 2015
Release # 20151028-01
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **SOUTHWEST ASIA****—** On Oct. 27, coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq. In Iraq, coalition military forces conducted 14 strikes coordinated with and in support of the Government of Iraq using bomber, fighter, and attack aircraft against ISIL targets.
The following is a summary of the strikes conducted against ISIL since the last press release:**Iraq**
* Near Mosul, two strikes struck two separate ISIL tactical units and destroyed two ISIL fighting positions and an ISIL heavy machine gun.
* Near Ramadi, two strikes struck a large ISIL tactical unit and destroyed four ISIL fighting positions and two ISIL light machine guns.
* Near Samarra, one strike destroyed four ISIL fighting positions.
* Near Sinjar, four strikes struck two separate ISIL tactical units and destroyed 11 ISIL fighting positions and suppressed an ISIL mortar position.
* Near Sultan Abdallah, one strike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL fighting position.
* Near Tal Afar, four strikes destroyed eight ISIL fighting positions, an ISIL weapons storage area, an ISIL logistical facility, and an ISIL staging area.
Strike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely. 
The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria, and the wider international community.
The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have conducted strikes in Iraq include Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, Netherlands, United Kingdom, and the United States. Coalition nations which have conducted strikes in Syria include Australia, Bahrain, Canada, France, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and the U.S.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERNEST LEE VADEN,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

D. L. RUNNELS, Warden; ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA,

 Respondents - Appellees.

No. 10-15029

D.C. No. 2:06-cv-01733-JAMGGH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 10, 2011

San Francisco, California

Before: HUG, SCHROEDER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner-Appellant Ernest Lee Vaden (Vaden) challenges the district

court’s denial of his federal habeas petition. Vaden asserted a claim based on

ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668

FILED

APR 05 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

(1984). Additionally, Vaden raised an uncertified issue concerning the trial

judge’s failure to appoint substitute counsel to present Vaden’s claim that his trial

counsel was ineffective.

 1. We agree with the district court that the state court did not unreasonably

apply Strickland. “[A] defendant claiming ineffective counsel must show that

counsel’s actions were not supported by a reasonable strategy and that the error

was prejudicial.” Massaro v. United States, 538 U.S. 500, 505 (2003). The state

court did not unreasonably apply Strickland, because as it observed, the medical

records were not especially probative regarding Vaden’s intoxication defense. See

Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689.

2. The district court was correct in denying habeas relief for Vaden’s claim that 

counsel was ineffective for failing to call an expert witness to support his claim of

intoxication. Assuming, without deciding, that counsel’s performance was

deficient, Vaden failed to establish prejudice, i.e., “a reasonable probability that,

but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have

been different.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694. As the magistrate judge noted, Vaden

did not provide a declaration from any expert to support his claim that Activan
3

increased his intoxication. This lack of supporting documentation precludes a

finding of prejudice. See Wildman v. Johnson, 261 F.3d 832, 839 (9th Cir. 2001). 

3. We do not address Vaden’s uncertified claim, because he failed to

“ma[k]e a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right” to warrant

issuance of a certificate of appealability. Rhoades v. Henry, 598 F.3d 511, 518

(9th Cir. 2010) (citation omitted). 

AFFIRMED.
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

#### § 40.229 What devices are used to conduct alcohol screening tests?

ASDs listed on ODAPC's Web page for “Approved Screening Devices to Measure Alcohol in Bodily Fluids” and EBTs listed on ODAPC's Web page for “Approved Evidential Breath Measurement Devices” are the only devices you are allowed to use to conduct alcohol screening tests under this part. You may use an ASD for DOT alcohol tests only if there are instructions for its use in this part. An ASD can be used only for screening tests for alcohol, and must not be used for confirmation tests.

[82 FR 52246, Nov. 13, 2017]
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 257 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      October 10, 2001.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, elected to the 
following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Standards of Official Conduct: Mr. LaTourette.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
## In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 11

- 00053

- CV

ALESIA K. JOHNSON, Appellant

V.

SCOTT MAHAND, J. J. (JACKIE) JOHNSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND

AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF

J. C. JOHNSON, DECEASED AND JIMMIE JOHNSON, Appellees

On Appeal from the 196th District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court No. 72416

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Alesia K. Johnson

, appellant, has filed a motion seeking to dismiss this appeal. Pursuant

to Rule 42.1(a)( 1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the motion is granted. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: February 24, 2014

Date Decided: February 25, 2014