alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 226

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that there should

be established a Children’s Vision Awareness Day.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 2, 2001

Mr. MATSUI (for himself, Ms. NORTON, Ms. CARSON of Indiana, Mr.

CAPUANO, Mr. MATHESON, Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr. SKELTON, Mr. SHIMKUS,

Mr. PASTOR, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina,

and Mr. REYES) submitted the following resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

there should be established a Children’s Vision Awareness Day.

Whereas the National Society to Prevent Blindness concluded

in a 1990 report that in the United States vision disorders are the fourth most common disability and the

most prevalent handicapping condition in childhood;

Whereas according to the United States Center for Health

Statistics, only about 14 percent of children in the

United States under the age of 6 receive an eye exam;

Whereas according to the Saratoga Vision Center, 1 of every

6 children in the United States is 2 or more grade levels
2

•HRES 226 IH

behind in reading, and 80 percent of these children have

difficulty in eye control and coordination;

Whereas according to a 1999 study by Helen Keller International, 25 percent of junior high school age children in

the United States cannot read a blackboard because of

near-sightedness;

Whereas untreated eye problems can affect learning ability,

personality, adjustment in school, athletic ability, and

self-esteem;

Whereas parents and teachers may have difficulty recognizing

some vision problems of children;

Whereas there is a national focus on education, but the essential role of good vision in education is often forgotten;

Whereas Vision Service Plan and America’s Promise have a

Sight for Students Program to help low-income, uninsured children obtain eye exams and glasses;

Whereas Vision Service Plan, Prevent Blindness America,

Head Start, and other community benefit programs with

an emphasis on vision will conduct eye screenings at the

Capitol and at State capitols across the Nation on September 26, 2001; and

Whereas the establishment of a Children’s Vision Awareness

Day on September 26, 2001, would recognize the importance of early childhood vision care: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that there should be established a Children’s

3 Vision Awareness Day.

Æ
#### Matter of New York, West Shore and Buffalo Railway Company, *Respondent, v.*Sidney Yates, *Appellant.*

— • Order reversed, with costs, new commissioner to be appointed by Special Term. Opinion by

Boardman, J.;

Bocees, J., taking no part.
§ 33.38 Limitations on placing rated orders. ( a ) *General limitations.* ( 1 ) A person may not place a DO- or DX-rated order unless entitled to do so under this part.
( 2 ) Rated orders may not be used to obtain: ( i ) Delivery or performance on a date earlier than needed;
( ii ) A greater quantity of the item or services than needed, except to obtain a minimum procurable quantity. Separate rated orders may not be placed solely for the purpose of obtaining minimum procurable quantities on each order;
( iii ) Items or services in advance of the receipt of a rated order, except as specifically authorized by the Department of Transportation (see § 33.41(c) for information on obtaining authorization for a priority rating in advance of a rated order);
( iv ) Items that are not needed to fill a rated order, except as specifically authorized by the Department of Transportation, or as otherwise permitted by this part;
( v ) Any of the following items unless specific priority rating authority has been obtained from the Department of Transportation, a Delegate Agency, or the Department of Commerce, as appropriate: ( A ) Items for plant improvement, expansion, or construction, unless they will be physically incorporated into a construction project covered by a rated order; and
( B ) Production or construction equipment or items to be used for the manufacture of production equipment (For information on requesting priority rating authority, see § 33.41); or
( vi ) Any items related to the development of chemical or biological warfare capabilities or the production of chemical or biological weapons, unless such development or production has been authorized by the President or the Secretary of Defense.
( b ) *Jurisdictional limitations.* ( 1 ) Unless authorized by the resource agency with jurisdiction, the provisions of this part are not applicable to the following resources: ( i ) Food resources, food resource facilities, livestock resources, veterinary resources, plant health resources, and the domestic distribution of farm equipment and commercial fertilizer (Resource agency with jurisdiction—Department of Agriculture);
( ii ) All forms of energy (Resource agency with jurisdiction—Department of Energy);
( iii ) Health resources (Resource agency with jurisdiction—Department of Health and Human Services);
( iv ) Water resources (Resource agency with jurisdiction—Department of Defense/U.S. Army Corps of Engineers); and
( v ) All materials, services, and facilities, including construction materials the authority for which has not been delegated to other agencies under Executive Order 13603. (Resource Agency with jurisdiction—Department of Commerce);
( vi ) Communications services (Resource agency with jurisdiction—National Communications System under Executive Order 12472 of April 3, 1984).
( 2 ) [Reserved]
----

**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                April 18, 2006 | By:    | /s/                Charles N. Eldred       |
|-------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|                                |   | Charles                N. Eldred           |
|                                |   | Senior                Vice President,      |
|                                |   | and                Chief Financial Officer |
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Adelina Barone, Appellant, *v.*Frank Fox, as Warden of the Workhouse, Defendant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent.

*People ex rel. Barone*v. *Fox,*144 App. Div. 611, reversed.

(Argued June 1, 1911;

decided June 16, 1911.)

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 16, 1911, which reversed an order of Special Term sustaining a writ of habeas corpus and discharging the relator from custody, dismissed the proceeding and remanded the relator to custody.

The proceeding was brought to determine the constitutionality of section 79 of chapter 659 of the Laws of 1910, providing for a medical examination of prostitutes and their commitment to a public hospital if found to be afflicted with any venereal disease.

*Bertha Rembaugh*for appellant.

*Charles S. Whitman, District Attorney (Robert S. Johnstone*of counsel), for respondent.

*617Order reversed and relator discharged on dissenting opinion of Clarke, J., below. ■

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Chase and Collin, JJ. Dissenting: Gray, J., on opinion of Ingraham, P. J., below.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1151.html[7/22/2015 2:41:33 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvd-2ise

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1151

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Terry Miller

General Comment

I can plan my own retirement. Disband this agency.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Quality Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,            as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.     | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                    |
|   |                                                                                                                                                 |
| 2.     | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|                        |                                                       |                     |   |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
| **Dated:** November 4, 2008 | **By:**                                                    | **/s/ STEVEN PLOCHOCKI** |   |
|                        |                                                       |                          |   |
|                        | **Steven Plochocki**                                       |                     |
|                        | **Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)**  |                     |
|                        |                                                       |                     |   |
| **Dated:** November 4, 2008 | **By:**                                                    | **/s/ PAUL HOLT**        |   |
|                        |                                                       |                          |   |
|                        | **Paul Holt**                                              |                     |
|                        | **Chief Financial Officer (principal accounting officer)** |                     |

          A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the            Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

45

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,251
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,107
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,712
<PP&E>                                         135,340
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 148,801
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,153
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           133
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,303
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   148,801
<SALES>                                         11,292
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,614
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,247
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,361
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,297
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,291)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,112)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,179)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,179)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.18)
        

</TABLE>
Iraq and Syria Operations Against ISIL Designated as Operation Inherent Resolve
 By U.S. Central Command News Release
  October 15, 2014 Release #20141018FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **TAMPA, Fla., Oct. 15, 2014 -** U.S. Central Command officials announced today that Operation INHERENT RESOLVE has been officially designated as the name given to U.S. military operations against ISIL in Iraq and Syria.  The operation name applies retroactively to all U.S. military actions conducted against ISIL in Iraq and Syria since airstrikes against ISIL began Aug. 8 in Iraq. According to CENTCOM officials, the name INHERENT RESOLVE is intended to reflect the unwavering resolve and deep commitment of the U.S. and partner nations in the region and around the globe to eliminate the terrorist group ISIL and the threat they pose to Iraq, the region and the wider international community.  It also symbolizes the willingness and dedication of coalition members to work closely with our friends in the region and apply all available dimensions of national power necessary - diplomatic, informational, military, economic - to degrade and ultimately destroy ISIL.
# JTF-435 provides computer equipment to Afghan courts

/ Published Aug. 24, 2010

KABUL, Afghanistan (Aug. 23, 2010) — To assist the Afghan government in enhancing its rule of law capabilities, officials from Joint Task Force 435 transferred computer equipment to the Supreme Court Compound here Aug. 21 as part of the Commander’s Emergency Response Program.

“I deeply appreciate the coordination between the multiple agencies involved, including the U.S. civilians from the embassy, JTF-435, ISAF and everyone else who was involved,” said Dr. Abdul Malik Kamawi, the administrator of the Supreme Court, through a translator. “We appreciate the way they came together to help us here at the Supreme Court by giving us these computers to help us improve our procedures.”

“This IT (computer) equipment will be used by all the courts of Kabul province so they can better communicate with each other and establish better record keeping,” said U.S. Navy Lt. Joe Moyer, JTF-435 Staff Judge Advocate Office.

This project provided computer equipment that will be used at the four trial courts and the appellate court for Kabul, said Moyer. “There is an urgent need to have a modern communications networking capacity within the Afghan judiciary system,” explained Moyer.

This project was initiated when members of JTF-435 Staff Judge Advocate visited the local courts and  analyzed the needs of the establishments. 

“We went on several trips out to the primary and appellate court houses to look at what the status was there, talk to their administrators, and see what they needed,” said Moyer. 

Moyer said with this equipment, Afghanistan will be able to greatly improve the ways they perform legal operations. 

“We look forward to more opportunities to work with your agencies,” Kamawi added through a translator. “We are excited to have these computers installed in each of the courts around Kabul and for our administrators who will use them each day, to receive training from technicians so we can use them effectively to speed up our processes.” 

This computer donation was the fourth CERP effort by JTF-435 since June. CERP funds have also been used to enhance security at a local women’s prison and provide vehicles to the Afghan government for official use.

CERP funds allow commanders to successfully respond to urgent humanitarian relief and reconstruction requirements within their areas of responsibility by carrying out programs that will immediately assist the local population. 

JTF-435 is responsible for all U.S. detention operations throughout Afghanistan and supports the overall strategy of defeating the insurgency and building the capacity of the Afghan government to provide security for its people.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 29, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 136133 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136133 

 COA: 282335 

Oakland CC: 2002-183506-FC 

VANG TER LOR,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 19, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d0721 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 29, 2008 

 Clerk
U.S. Naval Forces Complete Annual Maritime Exercise with Lebanon
 
  By U.S. Naval Forces Central Command Public Affairs
  – Naval forces from Lebanon, the United States and regional partners completed a nine-day maritime exercise ashore and near the coast of Lebanon, July 18. U.S. Naval Forces Central Command (NAVCENT) and the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) concluded exercise Resolute Union 2023 with counterparts from Egypt, France, Iraq, Jordan and the United Kingdom. This year’s iteration of the annual exercise focused on maritime awareness, operations, command and control, force protection and infrastructure defense. More 100 international personnel participated, including nearly 20 service members from the United States. The NAVCENT cohort included experts on explosive ordnance disposal, civil affairs, maritime security, maritime law, joint planning and amphibious operations. U.S. personnel solely participated in Resolute Union as observers and trainers this year, enabling LAF partners to carry out training drills as a team and enhance their maritime capabilities in key areas. “We have conducted Resolute Union many years in the past, but this year the U.S. supported in an observer and trainer capacity,” said Lt. Cmdr. Antoni Wyszynski from U.S. 5th Fleet’s task force for expeditionary combat operations, Task Force 56. “It is good to see how other partner nations are coming together to support Lebanese forces to develop interoperability and support maritime security.” Resolute Union exercises have fostered collaboration between Lebanese and U.S. armed forces for 23 years. In 2022, 60 U.S. service members conducted drills alongside their LAF counterparts on maritime security operations, mine countermeasures and explosive ordnance disposal. NAVCENT is headquartered in Manama, Bahrain and includes U.S. forces operating in the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, Red Sea, parts of the Indian Ocean and three critical choke points at the Strait of Hormuz, Suez Canal and Bab al-Mandeb.
Rule of Law Conference brings together Afghan, International partners
 By Master Sgt. Adam M. Stump , JTF 435
  KABUL, Afghanistan (Sept. 29, 2010) — Afghan, international and U.S. partners met here Sept. 27 to bring together Rule of Law practitioners from around the country to discuss Afghanistan justice issues. The conference gathered dozens of officials from the Afghan judicial sector, the U.S. embassy, multiple international partners and Combined Joint Interagency Task Force 435. Afghan Justice Minister Habibullah Ghalib was one of the key Afghan leaders at the conference.  During his remarks, Ghalib said Afghan laws should be for the people and the government needed to focus on a few issues of Afghanistan law enforcement, including the political administration, to ensure law enforcement is effective. Ghalib also said each law enforcement officer should have proper certification and Afghans need training on Afghan laws and the judicial system.  Ghalib added for Afghanistan to achieve effective coordination with the United States and the ISAF Coalition, law enforcement officials needed to establish strong professional bonds based on trust. U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan for Rule of Law and Law Enforcement Hans Klemm and U.S. Navy Vice Adm. Robert S. Harward, CJIATF-435 commander, highlighted how the U.S. partners with Afghans to enhance Rule of Law.   The U.S. Embassy created the Rule of Law and Law Enforcement directorate and CJIATF-435 created Rule of Law Field Forces-Afghanistan, a subordinate command that executes projects and programs to increase Rule of Law capacity in Afghanistan. According to Klemm, key innovation is the newly formed civilian-military Interagency Planning and Implementation Team that will provide policy guidance and operational support to Rule of Law practitioners throughout Afghanistan. Participants at the Rule of Law conference organized into a variety of specific working groups, literally rolling up their sleeves to diagram on white boards, develop metrics to assess progress and delve into important problem-solving exchanges to forge the way ahead. The conference also included presentations from field sites throughout Afghanistan.  The presentations focused on best practices in assisting the police in investigations, building cases, assisting judges and prosecutors, and holding public trials. Rule of Law Field Force-Afghanistan is an Afghan, civil-military and coalition unity of effort to build the legitimacy of the Afghan government.  ROLFF-A will implement a strategy focusing assistance on constructive programs ROLFF-A’s mission is to provide essential field capabilities and security to Afghan, coalition and civil-military rule of law project teams in non-permissive areas of Afghanistan, in order to build Afghan criminal justice capacity and promote the legitimacy of the Afghan government.