alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.23

                            DIRECTOR'S FEE AGREEMENT


       THIS DIRECTOR'S FEE AGREEMENT (the "Agreement"), made as of August 1,
2002, is entered into by Bookham Technology plc, a corporation organized under
the laws of England and Wales, (the "Company") and Lori Holland, a director of
the Company (the "Director").

       BACKGROUND. The applicable corporate governance rules imposed by the laws
of the United States, the United Kingdom and the exchanges on which the ordinary
shares and the American Depositary Shares of the Company are listed impose
significant ongoing responsibilities on the Company's Audit Committee, and on
the chair of that Committee. The Director has significant knowledge of the
Company, and a high level of expertise in financials matters, including the
capacity to perform as a "financial expert" within the meaning of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

       In light of the foregoing, the parties hereby agree as follows:

       1. SERVICES AS MEMBER OF AUDIT COMMITTEE. The Director agrees to perform
such duties as are necessary from time to time to discharge her responsibilities
as a member of the Company's Audit Committee and to act as Chair of the Audit
Committee, for an annual retainer of $40,000 per year. It is understood that in
consideration of such retainer, the Director shall act both as a member and as
Chair of the Audit Committee, and perform the responsibilities associated with
those functions, including, among other things, review of internal financial
management, monitoring and evaluation of the Company's relationship with its
outside auditors, monitoring of compliance with applicable financial reporting
regimes, evaluation of internal accounting controls, actions relating to the
Company's obligations under the so-called "Turnbull Report" and related matters.

       2. OTHER SERVICES AS A DIRECTOR. It is agreed and acknowledged that
this $40,000 is in addition to such other remuneration as the Director shall
be entitled to and the Director shall receive this retainer solely in the
Director's capacity as a member, and Chair, of the Audit Committee.

       3. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement
between the parties and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings,
whether written or oral, relating to the subject matter of this Agreement.

       4. MISCELLANEOUS. This Agreement may be amended or modified by a written
instrument executed by the Company and the Director, and shall be governed by
the laws of England and Wales.

<PAGE>



       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the
day and year set forth above.

                                         BOOKHAM TECHNOLOGY plc


                                         By: /s/ ANDREW RICKMAN
                                            -----------------------------------

By: /s/ LORI HOLLAND
   ----------------------------
       Lori Holland



                                       2
# “Capital Guardians” bring excellence to AFCENT skies

/ Published July 20, 2021
PRINCE SULTAN AIR BASE, KSA, 
Over the past week, aircraft and Airmen assigned to the District of Columbia Air National Guard’s 113th Wing arrived at Prince Sultan Air Base, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, to join the 378th Air Expeditionary Wing as it provides combat power projection across the region in defense of U.S. forces.The wing sent a contingent of U.S. Air Force F-16 Fighting Falcons to reinforce PSAB’s defensive capabilities, provide operational depth, and support U.S. Central Command operations.“We bring a range of capabilities uniquely suited to the AFCENT mission as the nation’s premier homeland defense unit, as well as deep experience in air-to-ground integration,” said Lt. Col. Christopher Wilson, 121st Expeditionary Fighter Squadron commander. “We are motivated to perform the mission and showcase the unique strengths of the Air National Guard.”Known as the “Capital Guardians,” members of the 113th Wing serve as the nation’s only federal National Guard unit and provide domestic operation capabilities in support of the District of Columbia.“This unit is no stranger to 24/7 operations, providing expert vigilance in defense of our nation’s capital and we bring that same enthusiasm to the PSAB team,” Wilson said.Other incoming leaders shared that sentiment.“Our Wing has a fairly unique mission,” said Maj. Jaresha Obey, 121st Expeditionary Fighter Generation Squadron commander. “Even at home station we provide an unrivaled 24/7 Aerospace Control Alert force to protect the Capital region and the Eastern seaboard. This requires us to keep our jets ready to go at a moment’s notice to defend our nation’s skies, building a foundation of care and competence that we plan to continue here.”Obey’s aircraft maintainers are responsible for fighter sortie generation and bring years of experience on F-16s to PSAB, especially as they prepare to tackle the challenges of agile combat employment taskings.“Most of our Airmen possess decades of aviation maintenance experience across a variety of weapons systems platforms, making us uniquely qualified to increase capabilities in the region,” said Chief Master Sgt. David Gilmer, 121st EFGS senior enlisted leader.The 113th Wing brought maintenance and support personnel from across the nation to support operations, with Air National Guard members from more than 30 states supporting the District of Columbia ANG deployment.“The district Capital Guardians routinely display pride and resolve in the defense of our nation’s capital and we are excited to bring our road game to the AOR to showcase the talents of our Airmen and the lethality of our aircraft in defense of the region,” said Gilmer.
IV

House Calendar No. 124

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 347

[Report No. 107–359]

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R.

622) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the adoption credit, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 14 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 13), 2002

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered

to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to

the bill (H.R. 622) to amend the Internal Revenue Code

of 1986 to expand the adoption credit, and for other

purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill

3 (H.R. 622) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

4 to expand the adoption credit, and for other purposes,

5 with Senate amendments thereto, and to consider in the
2

HRES 347 RH

1 House, without intervention of any point of order, a single

2 motion offered by the chairman of the Committee on Ways

3 and Means or his designee that the House concur in each

4 of the Senate amendments with the respective amendment

5 printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accom6 panying this resolution. The Senate amendments and the

7 motion shall be considered as read. The motion shall be

8 debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by

9 the chairman and ranking minority member of the Com10 mittee on Ways and Means. The previous question shall

11 be considered as ordered on the motion to final adoption

12 without intervening motion or demand for division of the

13 question.

House Calendar No. 124

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 347

[Report No. 107–359]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 622) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the adoption credit, and for other purposes.

FEBRUARY 14 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 13), 2002

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
#### Josie Teets, Respondent, v. The Village of Middletown, Appellant.

Judgment and order denying motions affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
# Ships Supporting Two Multinational Anti-Piracy Task Forces Train Together in Gulf of Aden

/ Published May 21, 2023
MANAMA, Bahrain , 
Ships from the South Korean and Italian navies sailed together and conducted combined training in the Gulf of Aden, May 17, while operating under two multinational maritime partnerships, Combined Maritime Forces and European Union Naval Forces.

Republic of Korea Navy ship ROKS Chungmugong Yi Sun-sin (DDH 975) and Italian Navy frigate ITS Luigi Rizzo (F 595) rehearsed ship and helicopter maneuvers while sharing best practices on vessel boarding procedures to enhance collaboration on combating maritime piracy.  

“The Korean and Italian ships collaborated, from the planning to execution making this a very successful interaction,” said Capt. Yoon Sung-won, commanding officer for Chungmugong Yi Sun-sin. “We have demonstrated seamless teamwork and the ability to respond promptly in any situation.”

During the training, Chungmugong Yi Sun-sin operated in support of Combined Task Force (CTF) 151, one of four operational task forces under Combined Maritime Forces, which includes 38 member-nations and partners. CTF 151 conducts counter-piracy missions led by Republic of Korea Navy Rear Adm. Ko Seung-bum.

“Our warships have once again joined forces. Through continuous training, we will strengthen the combined operational capabilities,” said Ko.

Luigi Rizzo participated while operating under Task Force (TF) 465, a multinational naval unit from European Union Naval Forces that also focuses on countering piracy in the Middle East.

Task forces from Combined Maritime Forces and European Union Naval Forces regularly collaborate to enhance interoperability through combined patrols and joint training. Japanese and Italian navy warships previously conducted combined training in the Gulf of Aden, April 8, while supporting CTF 151 and TF 465 respectively.

Established in 2009, CTF 151 conducts maritime security operations to deter, disrupt and suppress piracy and armed robbery at sea, outside the Horn of Africa. The task force is headquartered in Bahrain with U.S. Naval Forces Central Command, U.S. Fifth Fleet and Combined Maritime Forces.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-11226

Summary Calendar

MARCUS DWAYNE MAYBERRY,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL 

JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:97-CV-2592

Before WIENER, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff-Appellant Marcus Dwayne Mayberry, Texas prisoner # 605575, 

filed a motion in his original 1997 habeas proceeding for free copies of 

documents filed in his case. The magistrate judge (MJ) denied the motion 

because Mayberry’s habeas case was closed and he had not established any 

basis for further filings in the case. The district court denied Mayberry’s

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 20, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 12-11226 Document: 00512539421 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/20/2014
No. 12-11226

objection to the MJ’s order and his motion for reconsideration, and Mayberry 

now appeals the district court’s denial of those motions. 

We do not consider Mayberry’s argument, raised for the first time on 

appeal, that his constitutional rights have been violated based on his inability 

to obtain free copies of court records. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225

(5th Cir. 1993). Neither will we consider the arguments raised for the first 

time in Mayberry’s reply brief, which include his complaints concerning the 

dismissal of his appeal in Mayberry v. Thaler, No. 13-10077. See United States 

v. Jimenez, 509 F.3d 682, 693 n.10 (5th Cir. 2007).

Contrary to Mayberry’s contention, neither 28 U.S.C. § 2250 nor 28 

U.S.C. § 1915(c) provides him with a basis for requesting free copies of 

documents filed in his closed habeas case. Mayberry’s motion for documents 

was a “meaningless, unauthorized motion” over which the district court had no 

jurisdiction. See United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir. 1994). We 

therefore AFFIRM district court’s orders denying Mayberry’s objection to the 

MJ’s order and denying his motion for reconsideration. We also WARN 

Mayberry that if he continues to file repetitious and frivolous filings requesting 

free copies of court records, he could face sanctions, including dismissal, 

monetary sanctions, or restrictions on his ability to file pleadings in this court 

or any court subject to this court’s jurisdiction. 

2

 Case: 12-11226 Document: 00512539421 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/20/2014
Editorial Note on Part 572
Editorial Notes: 1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 572.32 Head. ( a ) The head consists of the assembly shown in drawing 78051-61X, revision C, and conforms to each of the drawings subtended therein.
( b ) When the head (Drawing number 78051-61X, titled “head assembly—complete,” dated March 28, 1997 (Revision C) with six axis neck transducer structural replacement (Drawing number 78051-383X, Revision P, titled “Neck Transducer Structural Replacement,” dated November 1, 1995) is dropped from a height of 14.8 inches in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section, the peak resultant accelerations at the location of the accelerometers mounted in the head in accordance with § 572.36(c) shall not be less than 225g, and not more than 275g. The acceleration/time curve for the test shall be unimodal to the extent that oscillations occurring after the main acceleration pulse are less than ten percent (zero to peak) of the main pulse. The lateral acceleration vector shall not exceed 15g (zero to peak).
( c ) *Test procedure.* ( 1 ) Soak the head assembly in a test environment at any temperature between 66 degrees F to 78 degrees F and at a relative humidity from 10% to 70% for a period of at least four hours prior to its application in a test.
( 2 ) Clean the head's skin surface and the surface of the impact plate with 1,1,1 Trichlorethane or equivalent.
( 3 ) Suspend the head, as shown in Figure 19, so that the lowest point on the forehead is 0.5 inches below the lowest point on the dummy's nose when the midsagittal plane is vertical.
( 4 ) Drop the head from the specified height by means that ensure instant release into a rigidly supported flat horizontal steel plate, which is 2 inches thick and 2 feet square. The plate shall have a clean, dry surface and any microfinish of not less than 8 microinches (rms) and not more than 80 microinches (rms).
( 5 ) Allow at least 3 hours between successive tests on the same head.
[51 FR 26701, July 25, 1986, as amended at 62 FR 27514, May 20, 1997]
# Operation Inherent Resolve non-combat related casualty

/ Published Feb. 20, 2017
February 20, 201720170220-01**SOUTHWEST ASIA —**
EXHIBIT 10(A)(I)

         Amendment No. 1 dated as of April 1, 1999 to Employment Agreement dated
as of January 1, 1998 (the "Agreement") by and between Colonial and Commercial
Corp., a New York corporation (the "Company,") and Bernard Korn, residing at
3466 Woodward Street, Oceanside, New York 11572 (the "Employee").

                              PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

         The Employee has been employed by the Company under the Agreement for a
term ending at the close of business on December 31, 2001. The Company desires
to insure the continuation of the Employee's employment through December 31,
2003 and the Employee is willing to insure such continuation under the terms of
this amendment to the Agreement.

         Accordingly, for good and valuable consideration, the Agreement is
hereby amended as follows:

         1.  Section 1.02 of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

              The Employee's employment hereunder shall be for a term commencing
              as of January 1, 1998 (the "Commencement Date") and terminating at
              the close of business on December 31, 2003 (the "Term").

         Except as amended hereby, the Agreement is in full respects ratified
and confirmed.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Amendment as of the
date set forth above.

                                                     COLONIAL COMMERCIAL CORP.

                                                     By:/s/ James W. Stewart
                                                        --------------------
                                                        James W. Stewart
                                                        Executive Vice President

                                                         Employee:

                                                         /s/ Bernard Korn
                                                         ----------------
                                                         Bernard Korn
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Auditors
-------------------------------

Board of Directors and Shareholders
Coachmen Industries, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-52378) pertaining to the Retirement Plan and Trust of Coachmen
Industries, Inc., 2000 Omnibus Stock Incentive Program and Supplemental Deferred
Compensation Plan, Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-59251) pertaining to
the 1994 Omnibus Stock Incentive Program, Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
2-64572) pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Coachmen Industries,
Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our report dated February 1, 2002, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Coachmen Industries, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 2001.



                                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Grand Rapids, MI
March 25, 2002
#### § 555.16 Renewal of exemptions.

An alterer, intermediate or final-stage manufacturer or a trade association representing a group of alterers or, intermediate and/or final-stage manufacturers may apply for a renewal of a temporary exemption. Any such renewal petition shall be filed at least 60 days prior to the termination date of the existing exemption and shall include all the information required in an initial petition. If a petition for renewal of a temporary exemption that meets the requirements of this subpart has been filed not later than 60 days before the termination date of an exemption, the exemption does not terminate until the Administrator grants or denies the petition for renewal.
KEVIN LEE ELLIOTT

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 3608

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 13, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Russell L. Healey , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Mark Graham Hanson, Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Jennifer J. Moore and Matthew Pavese,

Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS

, C.J., RAY and SWANSON

, J J

. , CONCUR.
# U.S., Turkey continue combined joint military patrols

/ Published Nov. 8, 2018

November 8, 2018

Release Number 20181108-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**SOUTHWEST ASIA -** U.S. and Turkish military forces conducted their second combined joint patrol northwest of Manbij today. The continued combined patrols allow U.S. and Turkish military forces to complement the local security structure for security and stability in Manbij.

"The interoperability skillsets that both nations enact through these joint patrols showcase a true level of professionalism and dedication to the people who are affected by ISIS's violent and false ideological beliefs," said Lt. Col. Earl Brown, a USCENTCOM spokesman. "As partner forces, we're entirely supportive of the Manbij road map and these combined patrols."

-30-

Arabic Version
----

(2004/C 88 E/0161)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3589/03

by José Ribeiro e Castro (UEN) to the Commission

(5 December 2003)

Subject:   Syria — US sanctions

A crushing majority (398 to 4) recently voted in the US Senate to authorise the imposition of sanctions on Syria, following the adoption of a similar act by the House of Representatives in October 2003.

This new law grants the US President powers to impose various economic and diplomatic sanctions on Syria and is intended to punish Damascus for its alleged links with terrorist groups and for the arms programme it is supposedly developing.

The USA has accused Syria of developing weapons of mass destruction, of sheltering and supporting radical terrorists belonging to Hezbollah, Hamas and Islamic Jihad, and of allowing its territory to be used by extremists threatening the coalition forces stationed in Iraq.

The Commission:

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(16 January 2004)

Apart from openly available sources, the Commission does not have any information on Syrian production of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) or the use of Syrian territory for acts of terrorism.

It seems some organisations listed by the Union as terrorist organisations (in particular Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad) use Syria, as well as other countries, for their activities. Syria has recently taken some measures to stop the public activities of these organisations. The Commission considers these measures insufficient and has urged Syria to cease its support to these organisations, which condone or actively perpetuate acts of terror, which, apart from being unacceptable as such, undermine the Palestinian Authority and, therefore, constitute an obstacle to re-launching the Middle East Peace Process.

The European policy towards Syria is one of constructive engagement. The Commission is concerned about the situation of democracy and respect for human rights in Syria, but it does not believe that isolating Syria will contribute positively neither to the regional situation nor to improving the political and human rights situation in the country.

Instead, the EU tries to engage Syria on the road to economic as well as political reforms in the framework of the Barcelona Process and, more specifically, through an Association Agreement.

This Agreement will provide a solid platform for the Union to support Syrian efforts to carry out political and economic reform. The clauses regarding respect for human rights, non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and fight against terrorism, will strengthen its ability to engage with Syria on these issues.

----