alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 381

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 381 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 381.100 What is the purpose of this part?

This part prescribes the rules and procedures for requesting waivers and applying for exemptions from those provisions of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) which were issued on the authority of 49 U.S.C. 31136 or chapter 313, and the initiation and administration of pilot programs.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 279 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      November 8, 2001.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2620) making 
appropriations for the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban 
Development, and for sundry independent agencies, boards, commissions, 
corporations, and offices for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, and for 
other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and against 
its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32-3



Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United
States Code



The undersigned officer hereby certifies,
as to the Report on Form 10-K of Commonwealth Edison Company for the year ended December 31, 2003, that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information
contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Commonwealth Edison Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: February 20, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    JOHN L. SKOLDS                          
|                        |  |  |  |                                                
|                        |  |  |  | John L. Skolds President Exelon Energy Delivery
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

WILLIS W. BERRY, JR.,

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA 

STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT 

BOARD,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 621 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of September, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
#### § 510.1 Scope and purpose.

This rule governs the use of the information gathering powers of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration contained in section 112 of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966, as amended 15 U.S.C. 1401, and sections 104, 204, 414, and 505 of the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act, as amended 15 U.S.C. 1914, 1944, 1990d, and 2005.
**EXHIBIT
      32**


**Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**


**(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
      Code)**





Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of China Bionanometer Industries Corporation, a Nevada
      corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
      that:





The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006
      (the
“Form 10-QSB”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
      in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China Bionanometer Industries Corporation and will be retained by China
      Bionanometer Industries Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.




Dated:
      November 26, 2007





/s/
                Wang Wen’gengWang
                Wen’geng, Chief Executive Officer(Principal
                executive officer)




/s/
                Xiang QinXiang
                Qin, Chief Financial Officer(Principal
                financial officer)
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 52001XC1219(03)

**Commission communication pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 — Modification by the United Kingdom of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services between the Orkney Mainland (Kirkwall) and the islands of Papa Westray and North Ronaldsay (Text with EEA relevance)***Official Journal C 363 , 19/12/2001 P. 0020 - 0020*

Commission communication pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92

Modification by the United Kingdom of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services between the Orkney Mainland (Kirkwall) and the islands of Papa Westray and North Ronaldsay

(2001/C 363/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

1. The United Kingdom has decided to modify the public service obligations in respect of the scheduled air services between the Orkney Mainland (Kirkwall) and the islands of Papa Westray and North Ronaldsay as set out in the notice published in the Official Journal of the European Communities C 394 of 30 December 1997, p. 4, as modified in the Official Journal of the European Communities C 369 of 22 December 2000, p. 2, pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes.

2. The modified public service obligations are as follows:

- Minimum frequencies:

- to Papa Westray - two return trips per day except Sunday all year round,

- to North Ronaldsay - two return trips per day except Sunday all year round.

- Capacity:

- the capacity of the aircraft used should be not less than eight passenger seats on each route.

- Fares:

- the price of a single adult fare must not exceed GBP 15 on each route.

The maximum fare on each route may be increased once every year with the prior written consent of Orkney Islands Council in line with the United Kingdom's retail price index (all items) or any successor index to this.

No other changes may be made to the fare levels without the prior written consent of Orkney Islands Council.

The new maximum fare on each route must be notified to the Civil Aviation Authority and to the European Commission which may publish them in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
Order entered December 31, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01409-CV

LEATHA A. MUNAI, Appellant

V.

WILLIAM K. MUNAI, Appellee

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-04-04859

ORDER

On our own motion, we VACATE our September 19, 2013 order submitting the appeal 

without the reporter’s record and deem the reporter’s record filed October 11, 2013 properly 

filed. Appellee’s brief remains due January 9, 2014. 

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/

ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, November 7, 1995 (141), Para 141.40 Senate Enrolled Bill Signed]
[Page 1879]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.141.40  senate enrolled bill signed

  The SPEAKER announced his signature to an enrolled bill of the Senate 
of the following title:

       S. 457. An Act to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act 
     to update references in the classification of children for 
     purposes of United States immigration laws.
```
# 2020

# 2019

# 2018

# 2017

# 2016

# 2015

# 2014

# 2013

# 2012

# 2011

# 2010

# 2009

# 2008

# 2007

# 2006

# 2005

# 2004

# 2003

# 2002

# 2001

# 2000

# 1999

# 1998

# 1997

# 1996

# 1995

# 1994

# 1993

# 1992
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 38959

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff-Respondent

,

v.

JUSTIN E. CLAYBORN

,

Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2012 Unpublished Opinion No. 358

Filed: February 7, 2012

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, State of Idaho,

Bannock County. Hon. Stephen S. Dunn , District Judge.

Order denying Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion for reduction of

sentence

, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Jason C. Pintler, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before LANSING, Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Justin E. Clayborn was convicted of possession of methamphetamine , Idaho Code § 37

-
2732(c)(1). The district court se ntenced Clayborn to a unified term of six years, with a minimum

period of confinement of two years

. Clayborn filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion, which

the district court denied. Clayborn appeals.

A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency,

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton , 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d

23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee , 115 Idaho 845, 8 46, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In

presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of2 new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the

motion. State v. Huffman

, 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). Upon review of the

record, including the new information submitted with Clayborn ’s Rule 35 motion, we conclude

no abuse of discret ion has been shown. Therefore, the district court’s order denying Clayborn ’s

Rule 35 motion is affirmed.
Exhibit
10.12





SECOND
AMENDMENT


TO
THE


PNM
RESOURCES, INC.


AMENDED
AND RESTATED


OMNIBUS
PERFORMANCE EQUITY PLAN





PNM
Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) previously established the “PNM Resources, Inc.
Omnibus Performance Equity Plan” (the “Plan”).  The Plan was amended
and restated, effective as of May 17, 2005, by the adoption of the PNM
Resources, Inc. Amended and Restated Omnibus Performance Equity
Plan.  The Company subsequently amended the Plan on one
occasion.  By this instrument, the Company now desires to amend the
Plan to reflect the treatment of Same-Sex Spouses for various purposes effective
January 1, 2009.




1.           Except
as noted below, this Second Amendment shall be effective as of January 1,
2009.




2.           This
Second Amendment amends only the provisions of the Plan as noted below, and
those provisions not expressly amended shall be considered in full force and
effect.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Second Amendment shall
supersede the provisions of the Plan to the extent those provisions are
inconsistent with the provisions and intent of this Second
Amendment.




3.           Section
2.1  (Definitions) of the
Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new definitions to the end
thereof:




(gg)              “Opposite-Sex
Spouse” – means
an individual of the opposite sex who is legally married to the Participant,
under the laws of the jurisdiction in which the marriage was performed or
occurred.








(hh)              “Same-Sex
Spouse” – means
an individual of the same sex who is legally married to the Participant, under
the laws of the jurisdiction in which the marriage was performed or
occurred.





(ii)              “Spouse” - means the Opposite-Sex
Spouse or Same-Sex Spouse of the Participant.





4.           Section
14  (Non-Transferability)
of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following sentence to the end
thereof:




Effective January 1, 2009, a qualified domestic relations order may be
entered in favor of a Spouse.







5.           Section
18.3  (Tax Upon
Disposition of Shares Subject to §422 Restrictions) of the Plan is hereby
amended by inserting the phrase “in favor of a Spouse” immediately following the
words “qualified domestic relations order.”





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, PNM Resources has caused this Second Amendment to be executed
as of this 10th
day of November,
2008.




PNM
RESOURCES, INC.






By: /s/ Alice A.
Cobb




Its:
SVP, Chief
Administrative Officer





2
§ 674.25 Role of the State safety oversight agency. ( a ) An SSOA must establish minimum standards for the safety of all rail fixed guideway public transportation systems within its oversight. These minimum standards must be consistent with the National Public Transportation Safety Plan, the Public Transportation Safety Certification Training Program, the rules for Public Transportation Agency Safety Plans and all applicable Federal and State law.
( b ) An SSOA must review and approve the Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan for every rail fixed guideway public transportation system within its oversight. An SSOA must oversee an RTA's execution of its Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan. An SSOA must enforce the execution of a Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan, through an order of a corrective action plan or any other means, as necessary or appropriate. An SSOA must ensure that a Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan meets the requirements at 49 U.S.C. 5329(d).
( c ) An SSOA has primary responsibility for the investigation of any allegation of noncompliance with a Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan. These responsibilities do not preclude the Administrator from exercising his or her authority under 49 U.S.C. 5329(f) or 49 U.S.C. 5330.
( d ) An SSOA has primary responsibility for the investigation of an accident on a rail fixed guideway public transportation system. This responsibility does not preclude the Administrator from exercising his or her authority under 49 U.S.C. 5329(f) or 49 U.S.C. 5330.
( e ) An SSOA may enter into an agreement with a contractor for assistance in overseeing accident investigations; performing independent accident investigations; and reviewing incidents and occurrences; and for expertise the SSOA does not have within its own organization.
( f ) All personnel and contractors employed by an SSOA must comply with the requirements of the Public Transportation Safety Certification Training Program as applicable.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SCOTT DAVID JOHNSON,

Petitioner :
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
: No. 419 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20th day of February, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Amendment to Employment Agreement of John Slack



 Exhibit 10.12 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is entered into effective as of June 13, 2003, by
and between John M. Slack (the “Executive”) and Castle Dental Centers, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). 
  
 W I T N E S S E T H: 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive are parties to an Employment Agreement
dated as of July 19, 2002 (the “Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company employs the Executive as its Senior Vice President. 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish to amend the Agreement. 
  
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants and obligations herein set forth and for other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt, sufficiency and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows, intending to be legally bound: 
  
 1. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Agreement
unless otherwise defined herein. 
  
 2. Sections 1 and 2 of the
Agreement are amended to indicate that from June 13, 2003 until a permanent Chief Executive Officer of the Company is hired (the “Interim Period”), the Executive will serve as interim Chief Executive Officer and will be subject to the
authority and direction of the Board of Directors. At the end of the Interim Period, the Executive shall resume his duties and responsibilities as currently described in the Agreement. 
  
 3. Section 4(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended to increase the Executive’s Salary to $15,416.67 per month effective
July 9, 2003. 
  
 4. A Section 4(f) is hereby added to the
Agreement which shall read as follows: 
  
 (f)
Special Bonus. During the Interim Period, the Executive shall be paid a special bonus of $5,000 per month for each month for which he serves as interim Chief Executive Officer. This special bonus shall be paid no less frequently than
semi-annually and any theretofore unpaid amounts shall be paid in full, including any applicable pro-rated amount for a partial month, upon the termination of the Interim Period. 
  
 5. Except as amended by this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and
affirmed. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has executed this Amendment as of the date and year first
above written. 
  

			
	 COMPANY:
  
 CASTLE DENTAL CENTERS, INC.

		
	By:	 	 
	 	 	

		
	Name:	 	 
	 	 	

		
	Title:	 	 
	 	 	



  

			
	EXECUTIVE:
		
	By:	 	 
	 	 	

	 	 	 John M. Slack



  

 2
#### The Jefferson County National Bank, Respondent, v. John C. Streeter, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Board-man, J.
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2015 6:03 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Good afternoon:

I understand that you would like to get investment planners to work for their clients rather 

than for themselves. This is EXTREMELY important. I recently retired and had been going 

to a planner for some time. While he mentioned 'fees', he never told us an amount. Then 

just before I retired, and he had urged me to move my 401K money into his plans, he said 

that he wanted to get us out of our current plan and into a better less expensive 

plan. What this entailed is that we had been put into annuities with high fees, much of it 

going into his pockets, and over time, his commissions were nearly gone so he was advising 

us to move all of our money into another annuity - though he only called it by the name 

Jackson. When I spoke to relatives about this plan, they explained the fees and that though 

we had already paid a great deal in fees over many years, now that his commission was 

gone, he was moving us into another annuity so he could, once again, get his 

commissions. For every 200 Net/month that my husband took, that company took 200 

every quarter AND also yearly fees. My husband only had $88000 in the account so this 

was a very high rate and a major loss to us since that was his only TSP money. We moved 

the money out of the government TSP fund because the government is always looking to 

take that money. 

With this advisor, when I questioned his activity and the fees on our account and asked for 

other alternatives, he told me to go elsewhere if I didn't like what he was doing. I am not 

trusting anyone now so am having a difficult time trying to get into the right plan. It has 

been nearly 6 months and I am losing out on a daily basis. Please make it a requirement 

that these advisors work in their clients best interests and make it a mandatory form that 

has to be read, line by line, by the advisor to the client and real numbers discussed, not just 

the word fees.

Also, the government should get rid of the GPO rule as it would help us greatly to get my 

husband's full social security. He worked public sector for 13 years and why the 

government fees they can take 2/3's of his money is beyond me. It is causing us a great 

hardship. His pension was part of the deal in being a government employee and his social 

security was part of the deal when he was in private sector. He deserves both!!

Best regards,

C.M.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 182 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 48
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 182

                          [Report No. 107-117]

 Providing for consideration of a concurrent resolution providing for 
 adjournment of the House and Senate for the Independence Day district 
                              work period.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 27, 2001

Ms. Pryce of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of a concurrent resolution providing for 
 adjournment of the House and Senate for the Independence Day district 
                              work period.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order, any rule of the House to the contrary notwithstanding, to 
consider a concurrent resolution providing for adjournment of the House 
and Senate for the Independence Day district work period.
    Sec. 2. House Resolution 179 is laid on the table.

                                                  House Calendar No. 48

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 182

                          [Report No. 107-117]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of a concurrent resolution providing for 
 adjournment of the House and Senate for the Independence Day district 
                              work period.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 27, 2001

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```