alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11

                          ORGANIC FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                                    THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED
                                                           SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                    ------------------------
                                                              1997
                                                             ------


PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE:
COMMON STOCK EQUIVALENTS                                       975,666
  OPTIONS AND WARRANTS GRANTED AND UNEXERCISED                (580,749)
                                                            ----------
                                                               394,917
TOTAL WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES ISSUED                         5,890,310
                                                            ----------
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                          6,285,227
                                                            ==========

FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
COMMON STOCK EQUIVALENTS
  OPTIONS AND WARRANTS GRANTED AND UNEXERCISED                 975,666
  ASSUMED BUYBACK OF OPTIONS (1)                              (580,749)
                                                            ----------
                                                               394,917
TOTAL WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES ISSUED                         5,890,310
                                                            ----------
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                          6,285,227
                                                            ==========


(1)  BUYBACK OF OPTIONS  UNDER THE  TREASURY  STOCK METHOD IS AT THE ASSUMED IPO
     PRICE OF $4.00 PER SHARE
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/21/15 

Received: July 21, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8k3r-fw0o

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2587

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I can plan my own retirement and decide how & when I want to spend MY money.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: February 17, 2010 

Received: February 05, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80a8e68d 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: EBSA-2010-0007 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for 

Participants and Beneficiaries in Retirement Plans 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0007-0001 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

--------- 

Submitter Information 

Name: Girard Miller 

Address: 

Malibu, California 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

--------- 

General Comment 

Re: RIN 1210-AB33 

Please see the attached web link and text, which appeared in public at 

Governing.com's web site, for fresh thoughts on how to provide lifetime 

income for individual citizens through a pension exchange. 

 

I stand ready to assist Treasury upon request, and have served 

previously as an advisor (Dave Walton, on arbitrage regs) and the White 

House (advisory commission on historically black colleges). 

 

Girard Miller 

310.795.1354 

 

http://www.governing.com/column/seeking-security-retirement-funds 

 

 

Pension-exchanges for IRAs and 401(k)s would strengthen President 

Obama's initiatives. 

By Girard Miller | February 4, 2010 

 

News reports indicate that the U.S. Treasury and the Department of 

Labor will soon begin soliciting ideas for how to provide retirement 

income security to IRA and 401(k) investors. The agencies' request for 

public comments reflects a continuing interest in this topic by Mark 

Iwry, the Treasury's top gun in the retirement field and a respected 

expert in retirement plan design and taxation. 

Iwry has himself written on the topic in his private life before 

joining Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner's team. The Obama 

administration linked this idea to its State of the Union initiatives 
to enhance Americans' retirement security, so the idea already has some 

White House buy-in. 

 

The idea of providing a secure lifetime income stream for IRA and 

defined contribution plan investors gained momentum after the market 

plunge of 2008 turned 401(k) plans into "201(k)" plans. Even with the 

recent stock market rally, they are still only "301(k)" plans, because 

most investors are still down 

25 percent from their peak levels in the 2007 stock market. Providing 

stable retirement income for a lifetime is just something that a mutual 

fund, corporate bond or bank CD cannot promise. 

 

The primary lobbyists for converting these tax-advantaged accounts into 

lifetime annuities are insurance companies, of course. T
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 160 (Monday, August 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 56848]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-17967]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Initial Review Group; Fellowships in Diabetes 
Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases.
    Date: October 12, 2023.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of 
Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Democracy II, Suite 
7000A, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Thomas A. Tatham, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, NIDDK/Scientific Review Branch, National Institutes of 
Health, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Room: 7021, Bethesda, MD 20892-
2542, (301) 594-3993, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#522633263a333f26123f333b3e7c3c3b3a7c353d24"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bacedbced2dbd7cefad7dbd3d694d4d3d294ddd5cc">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 16, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-17967 Filed 8-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 511.37 Sanctions for failure to comply with order. If a party fails to obey an order to provide or permit discovery, the Presiding Officer may take such action as is just, including but not limited to the following: ( a ) Infer that the admission, testimony, document or other evidence would have been adverse to the party;
( b ) Order that for the purposes of the proceeding, the matters regarding which the order was made or any other designated facts shall be taken to be established in accordance with the claim of the party obtaining the order;
( c ) Order that the party withholding discovery not introduce into evidence or otherwise rely, in support of any claim or defense, upon the documents or other evidence withheld;
( d ) Order that the party withholding discovery not introduce into evidence or otherwise use at the hearing, information obtained in discovery;
( e ) Order that the party withholding discovery not be heard to object to introduction and use of secondary evidence to show what the withheld admission, testimony, documents, or other evidence would have shown;
( f ) Order that a pleading, or part of a pleading, or a motion or other submission by the party, concerning which the order was issued, be stricken, or that decision on the pleadings be rendered against the party, or both; and
( g ) Exclude the party or representative from proceedings, in accordance with § 511.42(b).
Any such action may be taken by order at any point in the proceedings.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Business and Economy    >Retail - Monthly    >FAQs    >Monthly Retail FAQs    >Weather FAQs
 Skip to looking for section Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  Monthly Retail Trade Survey - Weather FAQs  How much do the areas that had the biggest impact from natural disaster or weather related events typically represent of the nation’s retail and food services sales? Emergency Preparedness
  Does the Census Bureau produce monthly retail and food services sales estimates for the affected sample areas?   As a result of any weather related event, does the Census Bureau modify its usual weighting or estimation methods used to produce monthly sales estimates?   Are any estimates ever withheld or delayed because of data collection problems related to weather events?   Can the reliability of the advance monthly sales estimates change because of weather related events?   Does the Census Bureau alter the procedures for developing seasonally adjusted estimates for the Monthly Sales for Retail and Food Services?   How do weather events impact the Census Bureau’s ability to collect data from respondents?   How does the Census Bureau determine the impact of weather related events on the companies?   What activities does the Census Bureau plan to ensure the affected areas will continue to be accurately represented?   Does this survey include retail and food service establishments in U.S. Territories?


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
From: Jon M Dandridge [mailto:jon.m.dandridge@jpmchase.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 9:07 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 

                I can't believe I am even wasting time out of my day to let you know that I DO NOT

want any of my 401K or IRA to be controlled by any form of government; state or federal.  If the

powers that be have done such a horrific job that they now are considering to take MY

retirement funds to do who knows what with, then there is a much deeper issue that needs to

be addressed.  There should be no further discussion of this; I know this document has about

lost its validity in this country but there is nowhere on the Constitution that gives the federal

government rights to take over privately owned retirement accounts.  

This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as an offer or 

solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or as an official 

confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data and other information are not 

warranted as to completeness or accuracy and are subject to change without notice. Any 

comments or statements made herein do not necessarily reflect those of JPMorgan Chase 

& Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates. This transmission may contain information that is 

privileged, confidential, legally privileged, and/or exempt from disclosure under 

applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 

disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including 

any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Although this transmission and any 

attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any 

computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the 

recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by JPMorgan 

Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates, as applicable, for any loss or damage arising 

in any way from its use. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately 

contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard 

copy format. Thank you. Please refer to http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures for 

disclosures relating to European legal entities.
Docket: EBSA-2010-0007 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in 

Retirement Plans 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0007-0001 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options 

Document: EBSA-2010-0007-DRAFT-0067 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: ALEX VOSKRESENSKY 

Address: 

2 JUNIPER HILL RD NE 

ALBUQUERQUE, NM, 87122 

Email: AVOSK@YAHOO.COM 

General Comment 

As a defined contribution plan and IRA participant I do not want to see any changes to the plans. The 

lifetime income option can be added as an additional option and used by the plan participant if the plan 

participant chooses to do so. The lifetime option must NOT be mandatory or required. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: April 14, 2010 

Received: April 11, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80ad5065 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=Print&PrintId=0900006480ad50... 4/14/2010
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 14, 2018

No. 04-16-00755-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF AMINITA PEREZ-MUZZA, DECEASED,

From the County Court at Law No 2, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2007PB7000089 L2

Honorable Jesus Garza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

On February 8, 2018, Appellant filed a Suggestion of Mootness, in which he requested 

this court vacate the probate court’s order granting summary judgment and render judgment 

dismissing Appellee’s case on the ground of mootness. Upon consideration of Appellant’s 

argument, Appellant’s request is DENIED. 

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of March, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of eAutoclaims, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 12, 2007 (the Report), I, Jeffrey Dickson, the President and CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of eAutoclaims, Inc.





/s/Jeffrey Dickson


Print Name:   Jeffrey Dickson

Title:   President & CEO

June 12, 2007





























---
From: Ellis M George [mailto:emg@emgeorge.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 11:13 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 

To whom it may concern,

Keep your hands off of my 401k retirement plan.  

Confiscating my wealth that I have worked for to give to another is absolutely immoral, the

government has no right nor claim to any of my money in my 401k.

Sincerely,

Ellis M George
CENTCOM, MacDill service members pay tribute to fallen Soldier
 By Sgt. Fredrick Coleman , CENTCOM Public Affairs
  Army Lt. Col. Jason Kerr, headquarters commandant for U.S. Central Command, gives tribute to his fallen soldier, Staff Sgt. Kristi N. Phifer, who was killed in a motorcycle accident June 3. (USCENTCOM photo by Sgt. Fredrick J. Coleman, USMC)
 MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. – U.S. Central Command’s headquarters commandant held a memorial service June 20 for their fallen Soldier, Staff Sgt. Kristi N. Phifer, who was killed in a motorcycle accident June 3. Phifer, a 29-year-old Hamilton, Ohio native, was an eight-year veteran assigned to USCENTCOM as the administrative non-commissioned officer in charge for the headquarters commandant. She is survived by her two children, Summer and Skyler; parents, Brian and Rebecca Reick; biological father Rickey Hunley; brothers, Rickey Jr. and Britton Reick; and sister Erica Farris.
From: Richard Mitchell [mailto:rlmitchell61@comcast.net] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 3:57 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 

I am a IRA participant and am opposed to any moves that will now or in the future impact 

my ability to choose how I want to invest my investment funds.

 

Richard Mitchell
§ 601.46 Processing of petitions. ( a ) A petition for relief will be conditionally granted for a period of three (3) business days from the date it is submitted to the Emergency Relief Docket.
( b ) FTA will review the petition after the expiration of the three business days and review any comments submitted thereto. FTA may contact the grantee or subgrantee that submitted the request for relief, or any party that submits comments to the docket, to obtain more information prior to making a decision.
( c ) FTA shall then post a decision to the Emergency Relief Docket. FTA's decision will be based on whether the petition meets the criteria for use of these emergency procedures, the substance of the request, and the comments submitted regarding the petition.
( d ) If FTA fails to post a response to the request for relief to the docket within three business days, the grantee or subgrantee may assume its petition is granted until and unless FTA states otherwise.
§ 594.9 Fee for reimbursement of bond processing costs and costs for processing offers of cash deposits or obligations of the United States in lieu of sureties on bonds. ( a ) Each Registered Importer must pay a fee based upon the direct and indirect costs of processing each bond furnished to the Secretary of Homeland Security on behalf of the Administrator with respect to each vehicle for which it furnishes a certificate of conformity pursuant to § 592.6(d) of this chapter.
( b ) The direct and indirect costs attributable to processing a bond are provided to NHTSA by the U.S. Customs Service.
( c ) The bond processing fee for each vehicle imported on and after October 1, 2014, for which a certificate of conformity is furnished, is $9.34.
( d ) Each importer must pay a fee based upon the direct and indirect costs the agency incurs for receipt, processing, handling, and disbursement of cash deposits or obligations of the United States in lieu of sureties on bonds that the importer submits as authorized by § 591.10 of this chapter in lieu of a conformance bond required under § 591.6(c) of this chapter.
( e ) The fee for each vehicle imported on and after October 1, 2014, for which cash deposits or obligations of the United States are furnished in lieu of a conformance bond, is $499.
[54 FR 40107, Sept. 29, 1989, as amended at 56 FR 49429, Sept. 30, 1991; 58 FR 51023, Sept. 30, 1993; 61 FR 51045, Sept. 30, 1996; 63 FR 45186, Aug. 25, 1998; 65 FR 56500, Sept. 19, 2000; 67 FR 60599, Sept. 26, 2002; 69 FR 52100, Aug. 24, 2004; 69 FR 57874, Sept. 28, 2004; 71 FR 43990, Aug. 3, 2006; 73 FR 39896, July 11, 2008; 75 FR 48613, Aug. 11, 2010; 77 FR 50642, Aug. 22, 2012; 79 FR 57007, Sept. 24, 2014]
# April 8 Red Sea Update

/ Published April 8, 2024

April 8, 2024Release Number 20240408-02FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla. –**Between approximately 12:15 p.m. and 2:40 p.m. (Sanaa time) on April 8, U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) forces successfully engaged and destroyed an air defense system with two missiles ready to launch, a ground control station in Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen, and one unmanned aerial system launched by Iranian-backed Houthi terrorists from Yemen over the Red Sea. There were no injuries or damage reported by U.S., coalition, or commercial ships.

Separately, at approximately 8:00 a.m. (Sanaa time) on April 7, an anti-ship ballistic missile was launched from a Houthi-controlled area of Yemen toward the Gulf of Aden where a coalition ship was escorting M/V Hope Island, a Marshall Islands flagged, U.K. owned, Italian operated cargo ship. There were no injuries or damage reported by U.S., coalition, or commercial ships.

This was the fifth observed missile launch against this coalition ship and M/V Hope Island.

USCENTCOM is dedicated to protecting the freedom of navigation and making international waters safer and more secure for coalition and merchant vessels.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Miriam Blank v. Jack Nuszen

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 01061

- CV

Trial court case number: 2008

- 51454

Trial court: 246th District Court of Harris County

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(c), the district clerk is directed to file

a s upplemental clerk’s record containing :

 “ Emergency Petition to Modify Parent

- Child Relationship” (image no.

63981348; dated 01/26/2015 )

 “ Default Order in Suit to Modify Parent

- Child Relationship” (image no.

65167615; dated 04/23/2015 )

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.5(c)(1). The supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed in the First Court

of Appeals within 10 days of the date of this order

.

The cost of preparing this record will be assessed as part of the costs of this appeal upon

issuance of this Court’s judgment.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry J e nnings

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: May 5, 2015
From: Douglas Clark [mailto:dclark73@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 9:30 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

Leave my hard earned and 401K savings alone! I am opposed to any law/regulation that 

proposes to convert my 401K to annuities. 

Sincerely, 

Douglas Clark 

6122 W. 82nd St. 

Los Angeles CA 90045