alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00612-CR

IN RE Terrance FLETCHER

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 8, 2010

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On August 24, 2010, relator Terrance Fletcher filed a petition for writ of mandamus,

complaining of the trial court’s failure to grant his pro se motions for speedytrial. However, counsel

has been retained by relator to represent him in the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court for

which he is currently confined. A criminal defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation. See

Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481,

498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). A trial court has no legal duty to rule on pro se motions or petitions

filed with regard to a criminal proceeding in which the defendant is represented by counsel. See

Robinson, 240 S.W.3d at 922. Consequently, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining

1... This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010-CR-1384, styled State of Texas v. Terrance Fletcher, pending

in the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Philip Kazen presiding.
04-10-00612-CR

to rule on relator’s pro se motion filed in the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court. 

Accordingly, the petition is denied. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-
----

(2004/C 84 E/0517)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0704/04

by Guido Sacconi (PSE) to the Commission

(4 March 2004)

Subject:   Transport of poultry

EU citizens have repeatedly expressed concern for the conditions in which animals destined for slaughter or further fattening are kept, and the EP itself has called several times for an overall time limit for transport of eight hours or 500 km.

This concern regards all kind of animals, whose suffering should be limited by stricter rules.

The EC proposal for a review of the legislation on transport does not include any reference to stocking densities, journey limits, or stops for feeding and watering for poultry.

Several cases of transport of poultry which have involved serious problems of welfare and even death of these animals have been reported; in some cases, hundreds of animals died because the cages in which they were kept were broken by the cages above that crashed on to them.

Strict measures for the protection of poultry need to be introduced as a matter of urgency.

The EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) is currently producing evidence relating to the transport of poultry.

How and when will the Commission introduce standards for poultry within the debate for a new Regulation?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(2 April 2004)

The Commission is aware of the animal welfare problems that may occur in the transport of poultry mentioned by the Honourable Member. The Commission proposal now under discussion in the Parliament and in the Council already includes general animal welfare requirements for the protection of poultry during transport aimed at improving the current situation.

Furthermore, in October 2002 the Commission requested the Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare to examine the issue in order to elaborate a detailed scientific opinion on the protection of poultry during transport.

As the Scientific Committee for Animal Health and Animal Welfare (Schahaw) had not completed its evaluation at the time of transfer of competence for scientific advice from the Commission to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), the request was taken over by the EFSA Panel and Animal Health and Welfare.

Once the EFSA opinion becomes available the Commission will consider presenting a proposal to introduce additional standards for poultry.

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **1**
**- 1**  **523**

DIANE LOGAN ,

P laintiff

– Appell ant ,

v.

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION ,
Defen d a nt

– Appell ee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Di strict of Virginia , at Roanoke

. Michael F. Urbanski , Magistrate Judge. ( 7 : 1 0

- cv
- 0 0 212

- mfu )

Submitted : August 25, 2011 Decided: August 29, 2011

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by unpublished per curiam opinion

.

Diane Logan , Appellant Pro Se

. Quinn E.N. Doggett , SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Diane Logan appeals the magistrate judge’s order *

AFFIRMED granti ng summary judgment for the Commissioner of Social
Security in her action seeking review o f the Commissioner’s

denial of s ocial s ecurity benefits

. On appeal, we confine our
review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th
Cir. R. 34(b). Bec ause Logan ’ s informal brief does not
challenge the basis for the magistrate judge ’s disposition,

Logan has forfeited appellate review of the magistrate judge ’s
order. Accordingly , we affirm. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal cont entions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

* The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).
§ 512.4 When requesting confidentiality, what should I submit? Any person submitting information to NHTSA, other than information in a class identified in appendix C of this Part, and requesting that the information be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(b) shall submit the following: ( a ) The materials for which confidentiality is being requested, in conformance with §§ 512.5, 512.6, and 512.7 of this part;
( b ) The Certificate, in the form set out in appendix A to this part;
( c ) Supporting information, in conformance with § 512.8; and
( d ) Any request for an extension of time, made in accordance with § 512.11.
§ 371.107 What information must I display in my advertisements and Internet Web homepage? ( a ) You must prominently display in your advertisements and Internet Web homepage(s) the physical location(s) (street or highway address, city, and State) where you conduct business.
( b ) You must prominently display your U.S. DOT registration number(s) and MC license number issued by the FMCSA in your advertisements and Internet Web homepage(s).
( c ) You must prominently display in your advertisements and Internet website(s) your status as a household goods broker and the statement that you will not transport an individual shipper's household goods, but that you will arrange for the transportation of the household goods by an FMCSA-authorized household goods motor carrier, whose charges will be determined by its published tariff.
( d ) If you provide estimates on any carrier's behalf pursuant to § 371.113(b), you must prominently display in your Internet website(s) that the estimate must be based on the carrier's tariff and that the carrier is required to make its tariff available for public inspection upon a reasonable request.
( e ) You may only include in your advertisements or Internet website(s) the names or logos of FMCSA-authorized household goods motor carriers with whom you have a written agreement as specified in § 371.115.
[75 FR 72996, Nov. 29, 2010, as amended at 88 FR 80179, Nov. 17, 2023]
# American, Jordanian soldiers conduct medevac training

/ Published Aug. 29, 2019
JORDAN, 

                U.S. Army Sgt. Ignacio Aparicio, center, crew chief, Golf Company, 5th Battalion, 159th Aviation Regiment, talks to members of Jordan Armed Forces’ 7th Mechanized Infantry Battalion about hand signals and casualty loading procedures during medical evacuation training in preparation for exercise Eager Lion 2019, Aug. 21, 2019. This multinational exercise is U.S. Central Command’s premiere exercise in the Levant region and is a major training event that provides U.S. forces, Jordan Armed Forces and 28 other participating nations the opportunity to improve their collective ability to plan and operate in a coalition-type environment. (U.S. Army Reserve photo by Sgt. Zach Mott)            

                Eager Lion 2019            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Sgt. Zachary Mott

VIRIN: 190821-A-SX453-0053
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fact Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jacqueline Danforth, President and Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  May 22, 2006

By:  /s/ Jacqueline Danforth

Name:  Jacqueline Danforth

Title:    President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal

Accounting Officer)
Editorial Note on Part 572
Editorial Notes: 1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 572.122 Head assembly and test procedure. ( a ) The head assembly for this test consists of the complete head (drawing 127-1000), a six-axis neck transducer (drawing SA572-S11) or its structural replacement (drawing 78051-383X), a head to neck-to-pivot pin (drawing 78051-339), and 3 accelerometers (drawing SA572-S4).
( b ) When the head assembly in paragraph (a) of this section is dropped from a height of 376.0 ±1.0 mm (14.8 ±0.04 in) in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section, the peak resultant acceleration at the location of the accelerometers at the head CG may not be less than 245 G or more than 300 G. The resultant acceleration vs. time history curve shall be unimodal; oscillations occurring after the main pulse must be less than 10 percent of the peak resultant acceleration. The lateral acceleration shall not exceed 15 g's (zero to peak).
( c ) *Head test procedure.* The test procedure for the head is as follows: ( 1 ) Soak the head assembly in a controlled environment at any temperature between 18.9 and 25.6 °C (66 and 78 °F) and a relative humidity from 10 to 70 percent for at least four hours prior to a test.
( 2 ) Prior to the test, clean the impact surface of the skin and the impact plate surface with isopropyl alcohol, trichloroethane, or an equivalent. The skin of the head must be clean and dry for testing.
( 3 ) Suspend the head assembly as shown in Figure N1. The lowest point on the forehead must be 376.0 ±1.0 mm (14.8 ±0.04 in) from the impact surface and the head must be oriented to an incline of 62 ±1 deg. between the “D” plane as shown in Figure N1 and the plane of the impact surface. The 1.57 mm (0.062 in) diameter holes located on either side of the dummy's head shall be used to ensure that the head is level with respect to the impact surface.
( 4 ) Drop the head assembly from the specified height by means that ensure a smooth, instant release onto a rigidly supported flat horizontal steel plate which is 50.8 mm (2 in) thick and 610 mm (24 in) square. The impact surface shall be clean, dry and have a micro finish of not less than 203.2. × 10−6 mm (8 micro inches) (RMS) and not more than 2032.0 × 10−6 mm (80 micro inches) (RMS).
( 5 ) Allow at least 2 hours between successive tests on the same head.
Exhibit 10.2



July 23, 2002



Fisher Broadcasting-Georgia, LLC

WXTX-TV

600 University Street, Suite 1525

Seattle, Washington 98101



Attn: Ben Tucker, President



Re: WXTX (Columbus, GA)



Dear Mr. Tucker:



This letter confirms that Fox Broadcasting Company (FOX) and
Fisher Broadcasting-Georgia, LLC (Licensee) have agreed that notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Station Affiliation Agreement (Agreement) dated April 20, 2001 between Licensee and FOX, Licensee and FOX hereby
agree to extend the term of the Agreement, and the Agreement shall end on June 30, 2007.



AGREED AND ACCEPTED:



|FOX BROADCASTING
COMPANY |  |                    |  | FISHER BROADCASTING-GEORGIA,
LLC
|------------------------ |  | ------------------ |  | --------------------------------
|                        
|By:                      |  | /s/    [ILLEGIBLE] |  |                                 
|Its:                     |  | President          |  |
#### § 557.8 Determination of manufacturer's obligation.

If the Administrator determines, on the basis of the information presented at a hearing or any other information that is available to him, that the manufacturer has not reasonably met his obligation to notify owners, dealers, and purchasers of a safety-related defect or failure to comply with a Federal motor vehicle safety standard or to remedy such defect or failure to comply, he orders the manufacturer to take specified action to comply with his obligation, consistent with the authority granted the Administrator by the Act.
# Army Maritime Service provides logistical support to Operation Spartan Shield

/ Published Nov. 18, 2019
KUWAIT NAVAL BASE, Kuwait, 

                Members of the 511th Engineer Dive Detachment prepare to receive additional divers approaching from the front ramp of the U.S. Army Logistic Support Vessel 5 (LSV-5) near Kuwait Naval Base, Kuwait, Oct. 23, 2019. The vessel at the time was hosting joint training between U.S. Amy 511th Engineer Dive Detachment and members of the Kuwait Fire and rescue Service. (U.S. Army photo by Staff Sgt. Robert Waters)            

                Army Maritime Service provides logistical support            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Staff Sgt. Robert Waters

VIRIN: 191022-A-MP275-467
OSWER/OSRTI

Washington, DC 20460

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST (NPL)

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may change 

as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to these 

substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on the Internet 

at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaq.html or by telephone at 1-888-42-ATSDR or 1-888-422-8737.

***Final Site*** March 2011

HORMIGASGROUNDWATER PLUME Caguas, Puerto Rico

 Site Location:

The Hormigas Ground Water Plume site, which consists of a ground water plume with no identified source(s) of 

contamination, is located in the municipality of Caguas, in interior east-central Puerto Rico.

 Site History:

The former Hormigas public water system (PWSID 5426) consisted of two wells (Eufracia and Hormigas) and served a 

population of 5,488 people. In August 2006, the system’s operator, Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority (PRASA), 

detected tetrachloroethene (PCE) above EPA’s Safe Drinking Water Act Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) in the 

Eufracia well. In response, the Commonwealth issued Notices of Violation in November 2007 and an Administrative

Order in February 2008. PRASA closed the Hormigas water system and disconnected the wells in February 2009. EPA 

collected two ground water samples from the Eufracia well in August 2009, and the results confirmed the presence of PCE.

Trichloroethene (TCE) and cis-1,2-dichloroethene (cis-1,2-DCE) were also detected in the Eufracia well.

 Site Contamination/Contaminants:

Chlorinated solvents (i.e., PCE, TCE, and cis-1,2-DCE) are present in ground water. The PCE and TCE concentrations 

significantly exceed the MCLs.

 Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment:

The Hormigas public water system, which provided water to more than 5,000 persons for many years, is no longer 

operational. Several community supply wells located within approximately 1 mile of the plume could suffer future impacts.

 Response Activities (to date):

The Commonwealth issued Notices of Violation to PRASA in November 2007 and an Administrative Order in February 

2008. The Hormigas water system was closed in February 2009. In December 2009, EPA conducted a reconnaissance 

effort in the vicinity of the Hormigas and Eufracia wells as part of a Site Discovery Initiative to identify possible sources of 

contamination. In February 2010, EPA collected soil samples from seven facilities identified as possible sources. 

Although PCE was detected in one soil sample, there is not sufficient evidence to identify the source of ground water 

contamination.

 Need for NPL Listing:

Other federal and state cleanup programs were evaluated, but are not viable at this time. EPA received a letter of support 

for placing this site on the NPL from the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fisher
Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I David D. Hillard, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 14,
2003



/s/    DAVID D.
HILLARDDavid D. Hillard Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer




*A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Fisher Communications, Inc., and will be retained by Fisher Communications, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00029-CR

EX PARTE ZACHARY DIXON PARKER §

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 43rd District Court

of Parker County (CV23-0098)

April 13, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Brian Walker

 Justice Brian Walker
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March      2, 2009 | By:    | /s/      Charles N.      Eldred                                          |
|-------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                |   | Charles      N. Eldred                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|                                |   | Executive      Vice President and                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|                                |   | Chief      Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|                                |   | Public      Service Company of New Mexico                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |

----
From: John Lahman [mailto:jlahman52@gmail.com] 

Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2015 1:39 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: DOL Fiduciary Rule

To Whom It May Concern:

The proposed rule would change the definition of fiduciary and require producers to act in their 

clients' best interests. We producers already act in the best interest of our clients and the rule 

would prevent many middle-class American from receiving the retirement investment advice 

they need.

I urge your rejection of this rule.

Thank you for your consideration.

John Lahman

jlahman52@gmail.com

623.256.9159

If you want to feel rich, just count all of the things you have that 

money can't buy.

- Anonymous