alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 565.21 Applicability.

See subpart A of this part 565 regarding the applicability of this subpart. This part applies to passenger cars, multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks, buses, trailers (including trailer kits), incomplete vehicles, and motorcycles. Vehicles imported into the United States under 49 CFR 591.5(f), other than by the corporation responsible for the assembly of that vehicle or a subsidiary of such a corporation, are excluded from requirements of § 565.23(b), §§ 565.23(c), 565.23(g), 565.23(h), 565.24 and 565.25.

[73 FR 23379, Apr. 30, 2008, as amended at 73 FR 28371, May 16, 2008]
###### Editorial Note on Part 572

#### Editorial Notes:

1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 572.71 General description.

(a) The representative 6-year-old dummy consists of a drawings and specifications package that contains the following materials:

(1) Technical drawings, specifications, and the parts list package shown in SA 106C 001, sheets 1 through 18, rereleased July 11, 1997;

(2) A user's manual entitled, “Six-Year-Old Size Child Test Dummy SA106C,” October 28, 1991.

(b) The dummy is made up of the component assemblies set out in Table A:

| Assembly drawing No. | Drawing title | Listed on drawing No. | Revision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| SA 106C 010 | Head Assembly | SA 106C 001, sheet 8 | A |
| SA 106C 020 | Neck Assembly | SA 106C 001, sheet 9 | A |
| SA 106C 030 | Thorax Assembly | SA 106C 001, sheet 10 | C |
| SA 106C 030 | Thorax Assembly | SA 106C 001, sheet 11 | D |
| SA 106C 041 | Arm Assembly (right) | SA 106C 001, sheet 14 | A |
| SA 106C 042 | Arm Assembly (left) | SA 106C 001, sheet 15 | A |
| SA 106C 050 | Lumbar Spine Assembly | SA 106C 001, sheet 12 | A |
| SA 106C 060 | Pelvis Assembly | SA 106C 001, sheet 13 | A |
| SA 106C 071 | Leg Assembly (right) | SA 106C 001, sheet 16 | A |
| SA 106C 072 | Leg Assembly (left) | SA 106C 001, sheet 17 | A |

Table A

(c) Adjacent segments are joined in a manner such that except for contacts existing under static conditions, there is no contact between metallic elements throughout the range of motion or under simulated crash-impact conditions.

(d) The structural properties of the dummy are such that the dummy conforms to this part in every respect both before and after its use in any test similar to those specified in Standard 213, Child Restraint Systems.

[56 FR 57836, Nov. 14, 1991, as amended at 62 FR 44226, Aug. 20, 1997]
From: Bruce Kellogg [mailto:brucelog3@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 12:10 PM

Subject: Advance an Alternative to the DOL Fiduciary Proposal

As your constituent and a licensed financial professional, I am very much opposed to the 

proposed rule from the Department of Labor. This proposal would have an immensely harmful 

impact on Americans saving for retirement. I am requesting that you oppose the rule in its 

present form since the DOL seems determined to move forward with the proposal without any 

serious regard for the objections raised by consumers, providers, and industry representatives. 

Hardworking Americans� retirement futures are at risk. While I support a best interest standard 

for all financial professionals, the rule as proposed is not workable and would have numerous 

unintended consequences for American workers and retirement savers, particularly those who are 

middle-class. The requirements in the rule would: � Force middle-class savers into low-service, 

do-it-yourself accounts. � Deprive average savers of meaningful, personalized planning advice. 

� Limit the scope of products and services available for retirement planning. � Severely reduce 

the availability of workplace retirement plans for small-businesses. � Prevent workers from 

accessing help from financial professionals when leaving their jobs, especially regarding the 

ability to rollover funds into lifetime income guaranty solutions. � Block plan providers from 

effectively and efficiently providing guidance and education to participants regarding their 

investment and retirement planning options. For these reasons, again, I urge you to intervene and 

advance a legislative alternative to ensure the DOL rule does not harm American savers. Help us 

to create a Best Interest Standard that works in favor of every day Americans, not against them. 

Thank you for your consideration. I can attest to the fact that clients rapidly approaching 

retirement are very concerned over the lack of funding for their retirement. They need quidance 

from financial advisers who except for a few bad "characters:welcome sound advice. This new 

legislation will diminish this guidance not enhance it. have been in the retirement planning 

business for over 30 years. I may consider giving up on my practice if this legislation prevails. 

The risk of being the victom of "vulture" advisers is a serious concern. Who would ever thought 

in 1982 when I got into this business that attorneys would run 800 numbers looking for a 

"breach" where lawsuits may exist. Same scenario Sincerely, Bruce Kellogg Principal Financial 

8180 State Rt 28 Barneveld, NY 13304
Argued March 19,

affirmed April 15, 1924.

#### *G. A.*VORPAHL *v.*LARETTA H. VORPAHL.

(224 Pac. 830.)

Divorce — Custody of Child Changed After Divorce, When for Child’s Best Interests.

Where, after decree of divorce, the father did not give a young girl in his custody the care and attention that her situation demanded, and it will he for her best interests and present happiness to be with her mother, a change of custody will be granted.

From Multnomah: Robert G. Morrow, Judge.

Department 1.

This is an application for the change of custody of Helen Vorpahl. The facts appear as follows: On July 3, 1915, plaintiff and defendant were husband and wife and on that day a decree of divorce was granted at the suit of the plaintiff. There were two children — one child, Helen, aged six years, and Hazel, aged three. The decree of divorce gave the custody of the younger child to the defendant, Laretta Vorpahl, and the older child, Helen, to the custody of the father. Mrs. Vorpahl was subsequently married to one Chester J. Bagley, with whom she is still living. She makes this application for the change of custody of the child Helen, who is now about fourteen years old, and alleges various reasons occurring since the divorce from her husband, Gr. A. Vorpahl, why such custody should be granted to her.

Affirmed.

For appellant there was a brief and oral argument by *Mr. W. L. Cooper.*

Right to deny custody of child to parent for its will-being, see notes in Ann. Cas. 1914A, 740; 41 L. R. A. (N. S.) 564.

*57For respondent there was a brief over the name of *Messrs. Christopherson & Matthews,*with an oral argument by *Mr. Q. Matthews.*

McBRIDE, C. J.

We have carefully considered the testimony in this case and agree with the Circuit Court that the child Helen has not been receiving the care and attention that a child of her situation demands. All things considered, it will be not only for her best interests, but for her present happiness, to be in the custody of the mother.

It is needless to discuss in detail the evidence which was submitted to the court below. It would add nothing to the sum of legal knowledge and be of no advantage to the parties to the suit, to the public, or to the profession, and therefore a discussion of the testimony is omitted.

The decree of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Brown, Rand and Coshow, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 801
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 801 appear at 86 FR 54641, Oct. 4, 2021.

§ 801.32 Accident reports. ( a ) The NTSB will report the facts, conditions, circumstances, and its determination of the probable causes of U.S. civil transportation accidents, in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 1131(e).
( b ) These reports will be made available on the NTSB electronic reading room.
[82 FR 58356, Dec. 12, 2017, as amended at 86 FR 74378, Dec. 30, 2021]
----

Removal from the register of Case C-359/02 (1)

(2004/C 94/90)

By order of 26 January 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities ordered the removal from the register of Case C-359/02 (Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Tribunale di Modena, Italy, Ufficio del Guidice per le indagini preliminari): Christian Lanzotti.

----

(1)OJ C 359 of 7.12.2002.

----
Aug. 23: U.S. Military Conducts Airstrike Against ISIL Near Mosul Dam
 By U.S. Central Command News Release
  August 23, 2014
Release #20140827 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE U.S. Military Conducts Airstrike Against ISIL Near Mosul Dam **TAMPA, Fla. -** U.S. military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in support of Iraqi security force operations, using fighter aircraft to conduct an airstrike in the vicinity of Mosul Dam. The strike destroyed an ISIL vehicle and all aircraft exited the strike area safely. This strike was conducted under authority to support Iraqi security force and Kurdish defense force operations, as well as to protect critical infrastructure, U.S. personnel and facilities, and support humanitarian efforts. Since Aug. 8, U.S. Central Command has conducted a total of 94 airstrikes across Iraq.  Of those, 61 have been in support of Iraqi forces near the Mosul Dam.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Business and Economy    >Wholesale    >Monthly    >FAQs    >Natural Disaster FAQs
 Skip to looking for section Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  **Monthly Wholesale Trade - Natural Disaster FAQs**
  How much do the areas that had the biggest impact from natural disasters typically represent of the nation’s wholesale estimates? For data from other Census Bureau sources on the areas impacted by natural disasters, please see the Census Bureau’s 
Emergency Preparedness page.
  Does the Census Bureau produce monthly wholesale estimates for the affected sample areas?   As a result of any natural disasters, does the Census Bureau modify its usual weighting or estimation methods used to produce monthly wholesale estimates?   Are any estimates ever withheld or delayed because of data collection problems related to natural disasters?   Can the reliability of the monthly wholesale estimates change because of natural disasters?   Does the Census Bureau alter the procedures for developing seasonally adjusted estimates for the Monthly Wholesale Trade Survey (MWTS)?   How do natural disasters impact the Census Bureau’s ability to collect data from respondents?   How does the Census Bureau determine the impact of natural disasters on the companies?   What activities does the Census Bureau plan to ensure the affected areas will continue to be accurately represented?   Does this survey include wholesale establishments in U.S. Territories?


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
Militants attack mosque; ISAF, Afghan troops assist injured
 By None  , ISAF Public Information Office
  KABUL, Afghanistan (July 27, 2009) – Insurgents attacked a mosque at a combat outpost in the Kamdesh District, injuring two Afghan National Army soldiers, who were awaiting evening prayer on July 26. The outpost was attacked with small arms fire, mortars, and a rocket-propelled grenade. The rounds impacted the outpost’s mosque. Afghan National Security Force (ANSF) and International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) service members treated the soldiers for shrapnel wounds, and medically evacuated those who needed further treatment. "These brave soldiers fight for the people of Afghanistan every day, and their sacrifices show that they truly care for the people," said Captain Jay Ireland, the outpost commander. "These insurgents have shown they do not care about the people of Afghanistan, nor do they respect these soldiers’ right to practice their religion." ISAF is a key component of the international community’s engagement in Afghanistan, assisting the Afghan authorities in providing security and stability and creating the conditions for reconstruction and development.
# CJTF-OIR Strike Summary Feb. 24 - March 9, 2019

/ Published March 15, 2019

March 13, 2019

Release # 20190313-02

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 

CJTF-OIR Strike Summary Feb. 24 - March 9, 2019

**SOUTHWEST ASIA** – Combined Joint Task Force – Operation Inherent Resolve and its partners continue to target and pursue the enduring defeat of Daesh.

CJTF-OIR and its partner forces' operations are exerting pressure on Daesh senior leaders and associates, as well as degrading, disrupting and dismantling Daesh organizational structures throughout Iraq and Syria.

CJTF-OIR remains committed to the enduring defeat of Daesh to improve conditions for peace and stability in the region, and to protect all our homelands from Daesh's terrorist threat.

Strike Summary

Between Feb. 24 - March 9, 2019, CJTF-OIR conducted 99 strikes consisting of 139 engagements against Daesh targets in Syria and Iraq.

In Syria, CJTF-OIR conducted 97 strikes consisting of 137 engagements, engaged 228 Daesh tactical units, and destroyed 71 tactical vehicles, 35 vehicle borne improvised explosive devices, 17 supply routes, 11 fighting positions, 10 weapons caches, eight staging areas, four command and control nodes, two tunnels, two heavy machine guns, one anti-aircraft gun, one fuel tanker, and one boat.

In Iraq, CJTF-OIR conducted two strikes consisting of two engagements.

Between Feb. 24 - March 9, 2019, CJTF-OIR detected 88 strikes from other actors that crossed the Euphrates River Valley. CJTF-OIR is committed to avoiding and in every case minimizing civilian casualties; CJTF-OIR calls on all other actors in the area to observe the same precautions.

This Coalition strike release contains all strikes conducted by fighter, attack, bomber, rotary-wing, or remotely piloted aircraft, rocket propelled artillery and ground-based tactical artillery.

A strike, as defined in the Coalition release, refers to one or more kinetic engagements that occur in roughly the same geographic location to produce a single, sometimes cumulative effect in that location. For example, a single aircraft delivering a single weapon against a lone Daesh vehicle is one strike, but so is multiple aircraft delivering dozens of weapons against a group of Daesh-held buildings and weapon systems in a compound, having the cumulative effect of making that facility harder or impossible to use. Strike assessments are based on initial reports and may be refined.

CJTF-OIR does not report the number or type of aircraft employed in a strike, the number of munitions dropped in each strike, or the number of individual munition impact points against a target. The information used to compile the daily strike releases is based on 'Z' or Greenwich Mean Time.

#DefeatDaesh
§ 98.2 Definitions. For the purposes of this part, the following definitions apply: ( a ) *Administration* means each of the following: ( 1 ) The United States Coast Guard.
( 2 ) The Federal Aviation Administration.
( 3 ) The Federal Highway Administration.
( 4 ) The Federal Railroad Administration.
( 5 ) The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
( 6 ) The Urban Mass Transportation Administration.
( 7 ) The Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation.
( 8 ) The Research and Special Programs Administration.
( 9 ) The Maritime Administration.
( b ) *Department* means the Department of Transportation.
( c ) *18 U.S.C. 207* means 18 U.S.C. 207 (a), (b), or (c) or any regulations issued under 18 U.S.C. 207.
( d ) *Secretary* means the Secretary of Transportation.
### Leslie H. Cox (Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 0847 )

Describe the a ircraft makes, models, and types (i.e., fixed

- wing, rotorcraft, lighter

- than

- air) for the proposed UAS operation. The descriptions should include the maximum weight (including payload).

Aircraft Used by Leslie H. Cox

Aircraft # 1

– Rotorcraft

- DJI Phantom 3 with Sony EXMOR Camera

See attached Operators Manual for full detailsAircraft #2

– Rotorcraft

- DJI Phantom 2 with GoPro Hero 3 camera

See attached Operators Manual for full details
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7131
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CALVIN LEE EVERETTE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:01-cr-00068-BO) Submitted: October 11, 2007 Decided: October 18, 2007 Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Calvin Lee Everette, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Calvin Lee Everette appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion for Rule 60(b)(3).” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Everette , No. 5:01-cr-00068-BO (E.D.N.C. June 21, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# BUFFS deploy to the Middle East

/ Published Dec. 30, 2020
SOUTHWEST ASIA, 
Release # 20201230-02

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

U.S. Air Force B-52H "Stratofortress" aircrews from the Minot Air Force Base, N.D.-headquartered 5th Bomb Wing made a deliberate appearance in the Middle East today to underscore the U.S. military's commitment to regional security and demonstrate a unique ability to rapidly deploy overwhelming combat power on short notice.

The two-ship deployment also delivers a clear deterrent message to anyone who intends to do harm to Americans or American interests.

"The United States continues to deploy combat-ready capabilities into the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility to deter any potential adversary, and make clear that we are ready and able to respond to any aggression directed at Americans or our interests," said Gen. Frank McKenzie, Commander, U.S. Central Command. "We do not seek conflict, but no one should underestimate our ability to defend our forces or to act decisively in response to any attack."

The United States continues to work closely with allies and partner to advance regional security and stability.

This mission is the third bomber deployment into CENTCOM's area of operation in the last 45 days.
# Pentagon praises Yemen for stand against al-Qaida

/ Published Dec. 30, 2009

WASHINGTON (Dec. 28, 2009) – The Yemeni government deserves praise for taking on the al-Qaida threat in that country, a Defense Department official said Monday.

 The Yemeni government took full credit for strikes against al-Qaida hide-outs and training sites Dec. 19. U.S. officials have been concerned that al-Qaida has been increasing in Yemen. “The fact of the matter is that Yemeni officials and government ought to be commended for taking on the al-Qaida threat that exists in their country,” Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said today. “Yemen has a growing al-Qaida threat and the government has taken the important steps to address it.” The Yemeni government said the strikes were a success, but there has not been an accounting of casualties in the strikes. The Defense Department has worked with Yemen to train their forces. The United States spent roughly $67 million to train Yemeni troops in counterterrorism operations, Defense Department officials said. Meanwhile, there haven’t been “any substantial increases in our training with Yemen over the past few months,” Whitman said. U.S. training with Yemen runs throughout the year and includes land, air and maritime scenarios. These exercises generally are small-scale events that last a couple of weeks at a time. The number of trainers involved fluctuates depending on the training, Whitman said, noting the exercises do not run back to back. Defense relations between Yemen and the United States are good. Yemeni servicemembers participate in the International Military Education and Training program and the United States has transferred military equipment and spare parts to the country. In fiscal 2006, U.S. Foreign Military Financing for Yemen was $8.42 million, International Military Education and Training was $924,000, and Non-Proliferation, Anti-Terrorism, Demining and Related Programs was about $1.4 million.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 164 (Friday, August 25, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 58250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18356]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED


Procurement List; Proposed Deletions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed deletions from the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing to delete product(s) from the 
Procurement List that were furnished by nonprofit agencies employing 
persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before: September 24, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, 355 E Street SW, Suite 325, Washington, DC 20024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information or to submit 
comments contact: Michael R. Jurkowski, Telephone: (703) 785-6404, or 
email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ecafa1b8a9aa8988be898bacad8e8580859895a38289c28b839a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="397a746d7c7f5c5d6b5c5e79785b5055504d4076575c175e564f">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C. 8503(a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide 
interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed 
actions.

Deletions

    The following product is proposed for deletion from the Procurement 
List:

Product(s)

NSN(s)--Product Name(s): 7210-00-266-9740--Cot Insect Net Protector, 
Olive Green
Contracting Activity: DLA TROOP SUPPORT, PHILADELPHIA, PA

Michael R. Jurkowski,
Acting Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2023-18356 Filed 8-24-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>