alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 160 (Monday, August 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 56891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18014]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, August 24, 2023.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website 
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has 
certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the 
following topics:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of 
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information; please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: August 17, 2023.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-18014 Filed 8-17-23; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```
Page 1 of 1

Date: September 13, 2012

MEMORANDUM

TO: Air and Radiation Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0542

SUBJECT: Meeting with Non-Governmental Organizations

On September 13, 2012, seven representatives from various non-governmental 

organizations (NGO) met with representatives of EPA’s Office of Transportation and Air Quality 

and Office of General Counsel to discuss EPA’s Notice of Data Availability on renewable fuels 

produced from palm oil. A complete list of attendees is below. Office Director Oge welcomed 

the NGO representatives and provided an overview of EPA’s work on palm oil, each of the NGO 

representatives summarized the perspectives of their organization, and a general discussion 

followed. Topics discussed included greenhouse gas emissions from drained tropical peat soil, 

and deforestation related to palm oil production. 

Meeting Attendees:

1. Glenn Horowitz, Climate Advisers

2. Brian Siu, Natural Resources Defense Council

3. Dough Boucher, Union of Concerned Scientists

4. Jeremy Martin, Union of Concerned Scientists

5. Chris Malins, The International Council on Clean Transportation

6. Craig Kirkpatrick, World Wildlife Fund

7. Michal Rosenoer, Friends of the Earch

Representatives from EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation

Margo Oge Director, Office of Transportation and Air Quality (OTAQ)

Chris Grundler Deputy Office Director, OTAQ

Karl Simon Director of OTAQ’s Transportation and Climate Division (TCD)

Ben Hengst Assistant Director, OTAQ/TCD

Paul Argyropoulos Senior Advisor, OTAQ

Robert Larson Senior Advisor, OTAQ/TCD

Aaron Levy Program Analyst, OTAQ/TCD

Angela Dickens AAAS Science & Technology Policy Fellow, OTAQ TCD

Representatives from EPA’s Office of General Counsel

Steve Wolfson

Roland Dubois
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CompuDyne Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 accompanying this certification
and filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Martin Roenigk, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,
to the best of my knowledge,  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  April 10, 2007

                                        /s/ Martin Roenigk
                                        ---------------------------
                                        Martin Roenigk
                                        Chief Executive Officer








                                       78
#### Mary V. W. Mills, Respondent, v. James Kerr and others, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Brown, J.
----

----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period(s) covered in the Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: March 29, 2010 |   |   |
|---------------------------|--------|--------|

|   | By:    | /s/ Richard M. Lavers   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Richard M. Lavers       |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

----

----
-----Original Message----- 

From: juliemac@pacbell.net [mailto:juliemac@pacbell.net] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 11:51 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Julie Machado 

22248 Main St 

Hayward, CA 94541
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                               This schedule contains summary financial
                               information extracted from the Balance Sheet and
                               Statement of Operations and Retained Deficit and
                               is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
                               financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                   1
<CURRENCY>                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                           $759,216 
<SECURITIES>                            0 
<RECEIVABLES>                           0 
<ALLOWANCES>                            0 
<INVENTORY>                             0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  765,277 
<PP&E>                                  0 
<DEPRECIATION>                          0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    772,079 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              21,651 
<BONDS>                                 0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0 
<PREFERRED>                             0 
<COMMON>                           52,786 
<OTHER-SE>                        689,251 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      772,079 
<SALES>                                 0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        0 
<CGS>                                   0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     143,150 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    2,603 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                (30,061)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (110,486)
<INCOME-TAX>                       11,967 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (122,453)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0 
<CHANGES>                               0 
<NET-INCOME>                     (122,453)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (.03)
                                          

</TABLE>
§ 633.23 FTA review of a project management plan. Within 60 days of receipt of a project management plan, the Administrator will notify the recipient that: ( a ) The plan is approved;
( b ) The plan is disapproved, including the reasons for the disapproval;
( c ) The plan will require modification, as specified, before approval; or
( d ) The Administrator has not yet completed review of the plan, and state when it will be reviewed.
----

**EXHIBIT      32.2**

| (1)   | the                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section                13(a) or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                 November                13, 2007 |   | /s/              William M. Salters  |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                        |   | William                M. Salters         |   |
|                                                        |   | Chief                Financial Officer    |   |
Editorial Note on Part 801
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 801 appear at 86 FR 54641, Oct. 4, 2021.

§ 801.1 Applicability. ( a ) This part contains the rules that the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) follows in processing requests for records under the Freedom of Information Act, as amended (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552. These rules should be read together with the FOIA, which provides additional information about public access to records maintained by the NTSB.
( b ) This part also provides for document services and the fees for such services, pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 9701.
( c ) This part applies only to records existing when the request for the information is made. The NTSB is not required to create records for the sole purpose of responding to a FOIA request.
( d ) Subpart F of this part describes records that are exempt from public disclosure.
Aug. 22: U.S. Military Conducts Airstrikes Against ISIL near Mosul Dam
 By U.S. Central Command News Release
  August 22, 2014
Release #20140826 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE U.S. Military Conducts Airstrikes Against ISIL near Mosul Dam **TAMPA, Fla. —** U.S. military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in support of Iraqi Security Force operations, using fighter and attack aircraft to conduct three airstrikes in the vicinity of the Mosul Dam. The strikes destroyed two ISIL armed vehicles and a machine gun emplacement that was firing on Iraqi forces. All aircraft exited the strike area safely. These strikes were conducted under authority to support Iraqi security forces and Kurdish defense force operations, as well as to protect critical infrastructure, U.S. personnel and facilities, and support humanitarian efforts. Since Aug. 8, U.S. Central Command has conducted a total of 93 airstrikes across Iraq
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 10, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-10095

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALEX BALDOMINO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:00-CR-50-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The current appeal represents Alex Baldomino’s second

attempt to appeal his guilty-plea conviction for being a felon in

possession of a firearm. Baldomino’s initial appeal was

dismissed when counsel failed to timely order the transcript and

make necessary financial arrangements. See United States v.

Baldomino, No. 00-11302 (5th Cir. Dec. 11, 2000) (unpublished). 

Baldomino filed a pro se 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion requesting

an out-of-time appeal due to ineffective assistance of counsel. 
No. 03-10095 

-2-

The district court determined that Baldomino was entitled to

relief. Accordingly, the district court reentered the underlying

criminal judgment on the docket, appointed Baldomino’s trial

counsel to represent him on appeal, and instructed counsel

regarding the date that the notice of appeal was due.

Notwithstanding the district court’s order, counsel did not

file the notice of appeal until more than six months had elapsed. 

Accordingly, the notice of appeal is untimely. See FED. R. APP.

P. 4(b)(1). A timely notice of appeal is a prerequisite to the

exercise of jurisdiction by this court. United States v.

Merrifield, 764 F.2d 436, 437 (5th Cir. 1985). Because

Baldomino’s notice of appeal is untimely, the appeal is 

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. 

By failing to file a timely notice of appeal on Baldomino’s

behalf, Guinn has failed to satisfy his duties as appointed

counsel. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that no payment be given to

Guinn for the time he spent working on this appeal.
#### Alonzo J. Aldrich, Respondent, v. The Home Insurance Company, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Haight, J.
#### § 630.8 Questionable data items.

FTA may enter a zero, or adjust any questionable data item(s), in any reporting entity's NTD submission that is used in computing the Section 5307 apportionment. These adjustments may be made if any data appears to be inaccurate, have not been collected and reported in accordance with FTA reference documents, or if there is not adequate documentation and a reliable recordkeeping system.
Editorial Note on Part 572
Editorial Notes: 1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 572.126 Knees and knee impact test procedure. ( a ) *Knee assembly.* The knee assembly is part of the leg assembly (drawing 127-4000-1 and -2).
( b ) When the knee assembly, consisting of knee machined (drawing 127-4013), knee flesh (drawing 127-4011), lower leg (drawing 127-4014), the foot assembly (drawing 127-4030-1(left) and -2 (right)) and femur load transducer (drawing SA572-S10) or its structural replacement (drawing 127-4007) is tested according to the test procedure in section 572.127(c), the peak resistance force as measured with the test probe mounted accelerometer must be not less than 2.0 kN (450 lbf) and not more than 3.0 kN (674 lbf).
( c ) *Test procedure.* The test procedure for the knee assembly is as follows: ( 1 ) Soak the knee assembly in a controlled environment at any temperature between 18.9 and 25.6 °C (66 and 78 °F) and a relative humidity from 10 to 70 percent for at least four hours prior to a test.
( 2 ) Mount the test material and secure it to a rigid test fixture as shown in Figure N6. No contact is permitted between any part of the foot or tibia and any exterior surface.
( 3 ) Align the test probe so that throughout its stroke and at contact with the knee it is within 2 degrees of horizontal and collinear with the longitudinal centerline of the femur.
( 4 ) Guide the pendulum so that there is no significant lateral vertical or rotational movement at time-zero.
( 5 ) The test probe velocity at the time of contact shall be 2.1 ±0.03 m/s (6.9 # 0.1 ft/s).
( 6 ) No suspension hardware, suspension cables, or any other attachments to the probe, including the velocity vane, shall make contact with the dummy during testing.
[65 FR 2065, Jan. 13, 2000, as amended at 67 FR 47328, July 18, 2002]
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/John W. Sammon                                   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|
| John W. Sammon                                      |
| Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive Officer |
| November  10, 2010                        |
|                                                |
| /s/Ronald J. Casciano                               |
| Ronald J. Casciano                                  |
| Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, |
| and Chief Accounting Officer                        |
| November  10 , 2010                       |
|                                                |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 304 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 304

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 808) to provide certain 
        safeguards with respect to the domestic steel industry.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 5, 2001

Mr. Kucinich submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 808) to provide certain 
        safeguards with respect to the domestic steel industry.

    Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this resolution the 
House shall resolve into the Committee of the Whole House on the state 
of the Union for consideration of the bill (H.R. 808) to provide 
certain safeguards with respect to the domestic steel industry. The 
first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with and all points of 
order against the bill and its consideration are waived. General debate 
shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed three hours, to be 
equally divided and controlled by Mr. Kucinich of Ohio and a Member 
opposed thereto. After general debate, the bill shall be considered as 
having been read for amendment under the five-minute rule. The 
amendment set forth in section 2 of this resolution shall be considered 
as having been adopted in the House and in the Committee of the Whole. 
No other amendment to the bill shall be in order except two amendments 
to section 5 (excise tax on steel) (as amended by the amendment set 
forth in section 2 of this resolution) of which one may be offered by a 
majority party member and one by a minority party member. At the 
conclusion of the consideration of the bill for amendment, the 
Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such 
amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final 
passage without intervening motion, except one motion to recommit with 
or without instructions. If the Committee of the Whole rises and 
reports that it has come to no resolution on the bill, then on the next 
legislative day the House shall, immediately after the third daily 
order of business under clause 1 of rule XIV, resolve into the 
Committee of the Whole for further consideration of the bill.
    Sec. 2. The amendment referred to in section 1 is as follows: 
Strike section 2 and titles I, III, and IV of the bill; redesignate 
sections 201 through 204 as sections 2 through 5, respectively; strike 
the center heading of title II; and redesignate the cross-references 
accordingly.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 572
Editorial Notes: 1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 572.10 Limbs. ( a ) The limbs consist of the assemblies shown as numbers SA 150 M070, SA 150 M071, SA 150 M080, and SA 150 M081 in Figure 1 and conform to the drawings subtended by these numbers.
( b ) When each knee is impacted at 6.9 ft/sec. in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section, the maximum force on the femur shall be not more than 2500 pounds and not less than 1850 pounds, with a duration above 1000 pounds of not less than 1.7 milliseconds.
( c ) Test procedure: ( 1 ) Seat the dummy without back support on a surface as specified in § 572.11(i) that is 17.3 ±0.2 inches above a horizontal surface, oriented as specified in § 572.11(i), and with the hip joint adjustment at any setting between 1g and 2g. Place the dummy legs in planes parallel to its midsagittal plane (knee pivot centerline perpendicular to the midsagittal plane) and with the feet flat on the horizontal surface. Adjust the feet and lower legs until the lines between the midpoints of the knee pivots and the ankle pivots are at any angle not less than 2 degrees and not more than 4 degrees rear of the vertical, measured at the centerline of the knee pivots.
( 2 ) Reposition the dummy if necessary so that the rearmost point of the lower legs at the level one inch below the seating surface remains at any distance not less than 5 inches and not more than 6 inches forward of the forward edge of the seat.
( 3 ) Align the test probe specified in § 572.11(a) so that at impact its longitudinal centerline coincides within ±2° with the longitudinal centerline of the femur.
( 4 ) Impact the knee with the test probe moving horizontally and parallel to the midsagittal plane at the specified velocity.
( 5 ) Guide the probe during impact so that it moves with no significant lateral, vertical, or rotational movement.
[38 FR 20451, Aug. 1, 1973, as amended at 42 FR 7153, Feb. 7, 1977]