alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                         |   | Year      Ended December 31, |    |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|---------|
|                                                                                         |   | 2005                         |    | 2006 |   | 2007 |   | 2008 |   |   | 2009 |   |
| EARNINGS                                                                                     |   |                    |    |    |   |    |   |    |   |   |   |   |
| Income      Before Income Taxes                                                              |   | $                            | 199,259 |   | $ | 286,422 |   | $ | 387,473 |   | $ | 346,869 |   | $ | 415,382 |   |
| Fixed      Charges (as below)                                                                |   |                         | 63,665  |   |   | 74,155 |   |   | 86,900 |   |   | 109,245 |   |   | 109,152 |   |
| Total      Earnings                                                                          |   | $                            | 262,924 |   | $ | 360,577 |   | $ | 474,373 |   | $ | 456,114 |   | $ | 524,534 |   |
|                                                                                         |   |                         |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| FIXED CHARGES                                                                           |   |                         |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest      Expense                                                                        |   | $                            | 59,539  |   | $ | 66,100 |   | $ | 69,625 |   | $ | 92,068 |   | $ | 88,184 |   |
| Credit      for Allowance for Borrowed Funds         Used During      Construction |   |                         | 1,526   |   |   | 5,955 |   |   | 7,275 |   |   | 2,677 |   |   | 5,968 |   |
| Estimated      Interest Element in Lease Rentals                                             |   |                         | 2,600   |   |   | 2,100 |   |   | 10,000 |   |   |  14,500 |   |   | 15,000 |   |
| Total Fixed      Charges                                                                     |   | $                            | 63,665  |   | $ | 74,155 |   | $ | 86,900 |   | $ | 109,245 |   | $ | 109,152 |   |
|                                                                                         |   |                         |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Ratio of      Earnings to Fixed Charges                                                      |   |                         | 4.12    |   |   | 4.86 |   |   | 5.45 |   |   | 4.17 |   |   | 4.80 |   |
EXHIBIT 10.33

November 12, 1997

To:     Mae Lyn Woo
        3080 Wrangler Road
        San Ramon,  CA 94583

Dear Mae Lyn:

Here is a summary of our offer to you for the position of Controller of 
our company:

        1)      Term:           2 years

        2)      Startdate:      December 15, 1997

3)      Annual salary:  $40,000 per year for the first year, 
adjustment for the 2nd year to be determined upon review.  
During the course of your employment, if the 
responsibilities and time involvement deviate significantly 
in nature from the originally anticipated capacity of the 
"Controller", then the salary shall be re-negotiated in 
good faith between the parties.

4)      At the end of each 12-month period, options to purchase 
10,000 shares of common stock of the company exercisable at 
the closing price of today November 12, 1997, subject to 
compliance with applicable laws.  If termination occurs 
prior to the end of a 12-month period, the number of options 
granted shall be prorated over the months of employment 
within that period.

5)      A $300 per month medical insurance allowance through the 
company's group plan with Kaiser Permanente or another 
carrier of your choice.

I hope the above points are acceptable to you and if that is the case, 
please acknowledge so by providing your signature below and the above 
points will then become the terms of our agreement.

Best Regards,

/s/ Anthony K. Chan
Anthony K. Chan
President & CEO


Accepted:

By:     /s/ Mae Lyn Woo                 Date:   November 12, 1997       
            Mae Lyn Woo


             AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT JULY 1, 1998


To:  Mae Lyn Woo
       3080 Wrangler Road
       San Ramon  CA 94583

Dear Mae Lyn:

This letter serves as an amendment to the Employment Agreement dated 
November 12, 1997 effective July 1, 1998.

The terms of the November 12, 1997 Employment Agreement are amended as 
follows:

3)  Annual Salary:  $70,000 per year beginning July 1, 1998.  The 
position is Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.

4)  At the end of each 12 month period beginning July 1, 1998, options to 
purchase an additional Five Thousand (5, 000) shares of common stock 
of the company exercisable at $6.5625 per share, the closing price of 
July 1, 1998, subject to compliance with applicable laws.  

The remaining terms and conditions as outlined in the original 
Employment Agreement continue to be in effect.


Best Regards,

/s/ Anthony K. Chan
Anthony K. Chan
President & CEO

Accepted:

By:     /s/ Mae Lyn Woo                         Date:   July 1, 1998    
            Mae Lyn Woo

<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc. ((PNBC() on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the (Report(), I Tony J. Sorcic, President & Chief Executive Officer of PNBC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of PNBC.






/s/ Tony J. SorcicTony J. SorcicPresident & Chief Executive OfficerMay 9, 2008






---
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED JOSE LUIS LEDESMA , A ppellant ,

v. Case No. 5D 22

- 62 LT Case No. 2020

- CF

- 000595

- AOR

STATE O F FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decisio n filed O ctober

4 , 2 022 Appeal from t he C ircuit C ourt for Or ange C ounty , Elaine A. B arbour , Judge.

Jos e L. Ledesma, Bristol, pro se.
Matthew J

. M etz, P ublic D efender, Daytona B each an d Ste v en N. Gosney, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona B each, for

A ppellant. Ashley M oody, A ttorney G eneral, Tallahassee, an d Whitney B rown Hartless, A ssistant Attorney G eneral, Daytona B each, for

A ppellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN , NARDELLA and WOZNIAK , JJ., conc ur.
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 32003D0927(01)

**Council Decision of 22 September 2003 appointing the members of the Advisory Committee of the Euratom Supply Agency***Official Journal C 232 , 27/09/2003 P. 0001 - 0002*

Council Decision

of 22 September 2003

appointing the members of the Advisory Committee of the Euratom Supply Agency

(2003/C 232/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular the second and third subparagraphs of Article 54 thereof,

Having regard to Article X of the Statutes of the Euratom Supply Agency(1),

Having regard to Council Decision of 14 June 1999 appointing the members of the Advisory Committee of the Euratom Supply Agency(2),

Having regard to the opinion of the Commission,

Whereas:

(1) The term of office of the members of the Advisory Committee of the Euratom Supply Agency expired on 28 March 2003.

(2) The members of the Committee for the period from 29 March 2003 to 28 March 2005 should be appointed, having regard to the nominations submitted by the Governments of the Members States,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The following persons are hereby appointed members of the Advisory Committee of the Euratom Supply Agency:

>TABLE>

Done at Brussels, 22 September 2003.

For the Council

The President

(1) OJ 27, 6.12.1958, p. 534/58. Statutes, as last amended by Decision 95/1/EC/Euratom/ECSC (OJ L 1, 1.1.1995, p. 1).

(2) OJ L 186, 2.7.1999, p. 1.
ANSF take the lead for Op Shafuq
 By Cpl. Anthony Ward Jr. , Regional Command Southwest
  Afghan National Police man tractors as they prepare to plow the poppy fields of Nad ‘Ali, Afghanistan during Operation Shafuq, April 22.(Photo by Anthony Ward Jr)
 NAD ‘ALI, Afghanistan (April 26, 2012) — As the fighting season begins to unfold, the Afghan National Army has decided to take the fight to the enemy. With British soldiers in an advisory role, all six kandaks with 3rd Brigade, 215th ANA Corps, along with local police, cleared insurgency and eradicated poppy throughout Nad ‘Ali, Afghanistan, during Operation Shafuq, April 18 through 23.The mission was to provide support to the Afghan National Security Forces as they cleared the area of insurgency and poppy, said British army Maj. Rupert King-Evans, adviser to Lt. Col. Mohammed Hamayoun, commander of 3rd Kandak, 3rd Brigade, 215th Corps.King-Evans is the commander of the Grenadier Guards of Inkerman Company, who throughout the five-day operation, patrolled countless kilometers of land alongside ANA and Afghan National Police and kept guard as they plowed rolling fields flourishing with poppy.Throughout the operation ANA and ANP forces would routinely receive Taliban resistance through gunfire and even improvised explosive devices, but that did not deter them from their mission.“We’ve disrupted the enemy, we found a number of IEDs and destroyed them, we found a number of weapons systems,” said King-Evans. “We captured at least two high-level insurgents on the watch list. I think overall its’ been a tremendous success.”The entire operation from the planning to final execution was done under Afghan leadership, showing just how ready the Afghan Security Forces are to take over.“I think they have done a really good job and I think that they know it,” said King-Evans. “It’s quite clear that there’s fantastic interaction between the ANA and the ANP who are clearly driving forward the government’s mission in Afghanistan and extending their reach massively.”The Grenadier Guards have worked with the ANSF in the past years, allowing them to see the growth the force has made toward a more independent operating organization.“It was quite good to work with the ANA, I’ve worked with them before,” said Sgt. Michael Fogg, a section commander with 12th Platoon, Inkerman Company, who previously deployed here in 2010. “It was really good to see the change from the first time I came out here, to what their like now. They’re really much better.”A noticeable difference in the tactics and procedures of the ANA and ANP was observed by the British forces, reinforcing the belief that the ANSF are ready to take the driver’s seat and lead Afghanistan into a safer tomorrow.
Amendment to Profit Sharing Plan



 Exhibit 10.10.3 
  
 AMENDMENT 
 TO THE 
 KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN 
 401(k) AND PROFIT SHARING PLAN 
 (As Amended and Restated Effective April 1, 2002) 

 
 The Kansas City Southern 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan, as amended and
restated effective April 1, 2002, (the “Plan”), is hereby further amended as follows effective January 1, 2001: 
  
 I. 
  
 The following sentence is added to the end of the first paragraph of Section 1.10 of the Plan: 
  
 Compensation (including Compensation under Section 3.08 of the Plan) also
includes any “qualified transportation fringe” within the meaning of Code § 132(f) if such amount is excludable from the Participant’s taxable income by reason of Code § 132(f)(4). 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Kansas City Southern has executed this Amendment.

  
 Dated: June 30, 2003 
  

			
	 KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Eric B. Freestone
#### § 802.20 Security records.

Pursuant to, and limited by, 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5), the NTSB's system of records, which contains the Security Records of NTSB employees, prospective employees, and potential contractors, shall be exempt from disclosure of the material and the NTSB's handling thereof under subsections (d), (e)(1) and (e)(4) (H) and (I) of 5 U.S.C. 552a.
Editorial Note on Part 572
Editorial Notes: 1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 572.75 Lumbar spine, abdomen, and pelvis assembly and test procedure. ( a ) *Lumbar spine, abdomen, and pelvis assembly.* The lumbar spine, abdomen, and pelvis consist of the part of the torso assembly designated as SA 106C 50 and 60 on drawing SA 106C 001, sheet 2, and conform to each applicable drawing listed on SA 106C 001, sheets 12 and 13.
( b ) *Lumbar spine, abdomen, and pelvis assembly response requirements.* When the lumbar spine is subjected to a force continuously applied according to the test procedure set out in paragraph (c) of this section, the lumbar spine assembly shall— ( 1 ) Flex by an amount that permits the rigid thoracic spine to rotate from the torso's initial position, as defined in (c)(3), by 40 degrees at a force level of not less that 46 pounds and not more than 52 pounds, and
( 2 ) Straighten upon removal of the force to within 5 degrees of its initial position when the force is removed.
( c ) *Lumbar spine, abdomen, and pelvis test procedure.* The test procedure for the lumbar spine, abdomen, and pelvis is as follows: ( 1 ) Remove the dummy's head-neck assembly, arms, and lower legs, clean and dry all component surfaces, and seat the dummy upright on a seat as specified in Figure 42.
( 2 ) Adjust the dummy by— ( i ) Tightening the femur ballflange screws at each hip socket joint to 50 inch-pounds torque;
( ii ) Attaching the pelvis to the seating surface by a bolt D/605 as shown in Figure 42.
( iii ) Attaching the upper legs at the knee joints by the attachments shown in drawing Figure 42.
( iv ) Tightening the mountings so that the pelvis-lumbar joining surface is horizontal; and
( v ) Removing the head and neck, and installing a cylindrical aluminum adapter (neck adapter) of 2.0 inches diameter and 2.60 inches length as shown in Figure 42.
( 3 ) The initial position of the dummy's torso is defined by the plane formed by the rear surfaces of the shoulders and buttocks which is three to seven degrees forward of the transverse vertical plane.
( 4 ) Flex the thorax forward 50 degrees and then rearward as necessary to return the dummy to its initial torso position, unsupported by external means.
( 5 ) Apply a forward pull force in the midsagittal plane at the top of the neck adapter so that when the lumbar spine flexion is 40 degrees, the applied force is perpendicular to the thoracic spine box. ( i ) Apply the force at any torso deflection rate between 0.5 and 1.5 degrees per second, up to 40 degrees of flexion.
( ii ) For 10 seconds, continue to apply a force sufficient to maintain 40 degrees of flexion, and record the highest applied force during the 10 second period.
( iii ) Release all force as rapidly as possible, and measure the return angle 3 minutes after the release.
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 1:36 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Dear DOL decision makers:

Please please please stand your ground on the proposed fiduciary standard for financial advisors and 

insurance salesmen and put it in place as currently proposed. 

Consumers are depending on you to not cave to all of the pressure that the advisors/salesmen, their 

associations and their "bought and paid for" politicians (through all of the PAC money that they funnel to 

certain Congressmen) are putting on you to retreat from the fiduciary standard as proposed to let the 

advisors and salesmen continue to hide behind the current suitability standard.

The suitability standard allows them to sell consumers what is best for the advisors' personal incomes 

rather than what is best for the consumer's interest. They want to continue to hide behind only the 

suitability standard, and to not fully and clearly disclose their big sales commissions and advisor fees, so 

that they can continue to support their expensive lifestyles on the backs of the consumers.

Also do not believe their claims that this will harm families or individuals with middle market incomes and 

investments or that it will destroy the industry. We are aware that they claim that the UK is the poster child 

for all of the bad things that will happen if the US requires a fiduciary standard. Don't buy it! 

The UK continues to have financial advisors and insurance salesmen albeit their industry has been 

cleaned up. Those who were in the business just for the easy money and big sales commissions have 

now left the UK industry to move to greener pastures and easier ways to make a killing. The good, 

ethical ones are still busy working as fiduciaries to do what is best for the consumers. Those who just 

wanted the easy money have left the UK industry. 

In personal discussions with several US financial advisors and salesmen, they admit that the fiduciary 

standard will not harm investors, neither middle income or others, but will merely require the advisors and 

salesmen to work to earn their big $$ incomes.

Thanks for standing firm and in putting the fiduciary standard in place as proposed. Consumers need the 

protection.

John Healy
From: Bankes, Steve [mailto:SBankes@smith.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 4:44 PM 

To: Include RIN 1210-AB33 

Subject: Include RIN 1210-AB33

Leave our 401's alone 

_______________________________________________________________________

_______ 

This email is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is 

addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. 

Copying, forwarding or distributing this message by persons or entities 

other than the addressee is prohibited. If you have received this email 

in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the material 

from any computer. 

This email may have been monitored for policy compliance. [021216]
Hillsborough,

June, 1896.

#### Wason *v.*Martel.

In an action to enforce a lien, a precept in the writ commanding the officer to attach “one million brick of the goods or estate of A” is not a sufficiently definite description of the property sought to be charged, and cannot be amended to the prejudice of subsequent attaching creditors or others claiming rights therein.'

Assumpsit, to enforce a lien on a lot of brick, for wood furnished to burn the same. Pacts agreed. The precept in the writ was as follows : “ We command you to attach one million brick of the goods or estate of A. Martel of Brentwood in the county of Rockingham for the purpose and in order to secure and perpetuate a lien thereon for the plaintiff for wood furnished to the defendant with which said brick were burned.” The attachment was regularly made by leaving an attested copy of the writ with the town clerk of Brentwood, November 5, 1896. The writ was dated October 30, 1895, and was made returnable “ on the third Tuesday of January next.” The term began on the first Tuesday of January, 1896. In the second week of the term, counsel for the plaintiff asked leave to enter the case in court and also asked leave to amend the writ by making it returnable on the first Tuesday of January instead of the third. The defendant had no brick except in Brentwood. Subsequent attaching lien-creditors and a mortgagee appeared and opposed the motion.

*Sulloway $ Toplif,*for the plaintiff.

*Drury Peaslee*and *Emile H. Tardivel,*for the defendant, subsequent attaching creditors, and the mortgagee.

*561Blodgett, J.

Irrespective of other objections which it is unnecessary to consider, it is enough to say that if the plaintiff’s requests should be granted it would not avail him.

The attachment precept is fatally defective as against the opposing creditors. In order to preserve a lien, it is necessary that the precept should clearly identify or describe the property intended to be charged, or at least, as definitely as the nature of the case will reasonably admit. *Hill*v. *Callahan,*58 N. H. 497, 499; *Mundy*v. *Munson,*40 Hun 304, 308; *Drake*v. *Taylor,*6 Blatchf. 14; *Kennedy*v. *House,*41 Pa. St. 39,—80 Am. Dec. 594; *Stevens*v. *Osman,*1 Mich. 92. It is hardly necessary to say that a mandate to attach “ one million brick of the goods or estate of A. Martel of Brentwood in the county of Rocking-ham ” is not such a description. Nor can such a mandate be amended to the prejudice of subsequent attaching lien-creditors, or other third persons having rights in the property. P. S., *c.*222, *s. 8.*

In short, the case presented is one of a suit *in rem*which does not describe the *res,*or, at most, gives only an attempted description which does not describe. But in addition to this, and in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, it must presumptively be taken that the officer followed the mandate in his return of the attachment.

*The plaintiff’s requests should be denied.*

All concurred.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 A1 74 0 . CHRI STOPHER EGGERSDORF-MCCLURE v . THE STATE.

Th i s cas e w a s d ock et ed b y t h i s co u rt o n Ap ri l 1 , 2 01 9 , an d Ap p el l an t ’ s b ri ef

an d en u m erat i on s of erro r were d u e Ap ri l 2 2 , 2 0 1 9

. As o f t h e d at e o f t h i s o rd er, Ap p el l an t s t il l h as n o t fi l ed a b ri ef an d en um erat i o n o f erro rs an d h as n ot req u es t ed

an ex t en s i on o f t i m e i n wh i ch t o d o s o

. Acco rd i n g l y , t h i s ap p e a l i s h ereb y DISM ISSED as ab an d on ed p u rs u an t t o Co u rt o f Ap p eal s Ru les 1 3 an d 2 3

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. June 03, 2019

06/03/2019