alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.149 May the MRO change a verified drug test result? ( a ) As the MRO, you may change a verified test result only in the following situations: ( 1 ) When you have reopened a verification that was done without an interview with an employee (see § 40.133(d)).
( 2 ) If you receive information, not available to you at the time of the original verification, demonstrating that the laboratory made an error in identifying (*e.g.,* a paperwork mistake) or testing (*e.g.,* a false positive or negative) the employee's primary or split specimen. For example, suppose the laboratory originally reported a positive test result for Employee X and a negative result for Employee Y. You verified the test results as reported to you. Then the laboratory notifies you that it mixed up the two test results, and X was really negative and Y was really positive. You would change X's test result from positive to negative and contact Y to conduct a verification interview.
( 3 ) If, within 60 days of the original verification decision— ( i ) You receive information that could not reasonably have been provided to you at the time of the decision demonstrating that there is a legitimate medical explanation for the presence of drug(s)/metabolite(s) in the employee's specimen; or
( ii ) You receive credible new or additional evidence that a legitimate medical explanation for an adulterated or substituted result exists. Example to paragraph (a)(3): If the employee's physician provides you a valid prescription that he or she failed to find at the time of the original verification, you may change the test result from positive to negative if you conclude that the prescription provides a legitimate medical explanation for the drug(s)/ metabolite(s) in the employee's specimen.
( 4 ) If you receive the information in paragraph (a)(3) of this section after the 60-day period, you must consult with ODAPC prior to changing the result.
( 5 ) When you have made an administrative error and reported an incorrect result.
( b ) If you change the result, you must immediately notify the DER in writing, as provided in §§ 40.163-40.165.
( c ) You are the only person permitted to change a verified test result, such as a verified positive test result or a determination that an individual has refused to test because of adulteration or substitution. This is because, as the MRO, you have the sole authority under this part to make medical determinations leading to a verified test (e.g., a determination that there was or was not a legitimate medical explanation for a laboratory test result). For example, an arbitrator is not permitted to overturn the medical judgment of the MRO that the employee failed to present a legitimate medical explanation for a positive, adulterated, or substituted test result of his or her specimen.
[65 FR 79526, Dec. 19, 2000, as amended at 66 FR 41952, Aug. 9, 2001; 73 FR 35971, June 25, 2008]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsHydrogen induced fracture characteristics of single crystal nickel-based superalloysA stereoscopic method for use with x ray energy dispersive spectroscopy of rough surfaces was adapted and applied to the fracture surfaces single crystals of PWA 1480E to permit rapid orientation determinations of small cleavage planes. The method uses a mathematical treatment of stereo pair photomicrographs to measure the angle between the electron beam and the surface normal. One reference crystal orientation corresponding to the electron beam direction (crystal growth direction) is required to perform this trace analysis. The microstructure of PWA 1480E was characterized before fracture analysis was performed. The fracture behavior of single crystals of the PWA 1480E nickel-based superalloy was studied. The hydrogen-induced fracture behavior of single crystals of the PWA 1480E nickel-based superalloy was also studied. In order to understand the temperature dependence of hydrogen-induced embrittlement, notched single crystals with three different crystal growth orientations near zone axes (100), (110), and (111) were tensile tested at 871 C (1600 F) in both helium and hydrogen atmospheres at 34 MPa. Results and conclusions are given.Document ID19900016792Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsChen, Po-Shou*(Auburn Univ. AL, United States)*Wilcox, Roy C.*(Auburn Univ. AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 18, 1990Subject CategoryMetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:183992NASA-CR-183992Accession Number90N26108Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-38184Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900016792.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
From: Edward Cline [mailto:skeen66@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 2:09 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

Congress: 

 

Show me where in the Constitution you are empowered to take over private 

retirement plans, never mind health insurance, health care, car manufacturing, 

banking, housing mortgages, and energy production. And, please, don't answer with 

some Yadda Yadda about the "general welfare" and "commerce" clauses. Those 

clauses meant something absolute to the Founders, and are not open to subjective 

interpretation. They meant the exact opposite of what you want to believe they 

mean. The Founders did not mean that their successors had the leave to create a 

welfare state and a minimum security prison of indentured servants. They did their 

best to ensure liberty and the preservation and protection of individual rights. 

 

The wealth represented in retirement plans is not yours to seize, let alone "manage." 

 

And even if I agreed that you should be empowered to seize and manage them 

(conceding I'm not bright enough to do it myself), I'd ask to see your own score card 

in the matter of managing government finances. It's a pretty sorry looking score 

card, isn't it? Debt over debt, higher or more taxes to service the debt, more debt, 

more debt, then a round of inflation, which only you benefit by, and which devalues 

the dollar and makes everything else more expensive. 

 

My advice to you, my pseudo-Solons, is: Drop it. You're already in hot water with the 

electorate over ObamaCare and everything else.

 

Edward Cline 

Williamsburg, VA

The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. Get 

started.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 23, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 57465]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18192]



[[Page 57465]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Office of Intramural Research Notice of Charter Renewal

    In accordance with title 41 of the U.S. Code of Federal 
Regulations, section 102-3.65(a), notice is hereby given that the 
Charter for the Advisory Committee to the Deputy Director for 
Intramural Research, National Institutes of Health was renewed for an 
additional two-year period on August 15, 2023.
    It is determined that the Advisory Committee to the Deputy Director 
for Intramural Research, National Institutes of Health is in the public 
interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on the 
National Institutes of Health by law, and that these duties can best be 
performed through the advice and counsel of this group.
    Inquiries may be directed to Claire Harris, Director, Office of 
Federal Advisory Committee Policy, Office of the Director, National 
Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 1000, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20892 (Mail Stop Code 4875), Telephone (301) 496-2123, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a4ccc5d6d6cdd7c7c8e4c9c5cdc88acacdcc8ac3cbd2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="452d2437372c3626290528242c296b2b2c2d6b222a33">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: August 18, 2023.
David W Freeman,
Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee 
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-18192 Filed 8-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1125.html[7/22/2015 12:11:49 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-iy8r

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1125

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: crystal sparkowich

Organization: American Citizenry

General Comment

Enough. The American people have had more than enough of Washington. Stay away from our own hard earned

 money; we worked for it not you....the American people are finished with the government stealing from them.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA three-dimensional finite-element thermal/mechanical analytical technique for high-performance traveling wave tubesCurrent research in high-efficiency, high-performance traveling wave tubes (TWT's) has led to the development of novel thermal/ mechanical computer models for use with helical slow-wave structures. A three-dimensional, finite element computer model and analytical technique used to study the structural integrity and thermal operation of a high-efficiency, diamond-rod, K-band TWT designed for use in advanced space communications systems. This analysis focused on the slow-wave circuit in the radiofrequency section of the TWT, where an inherent localized heating problem existed and where failures were observed during earlier cold compression, or 'coining' fabrication technique that shows great potential for future TWT development efforts. For this analysis, a three-dimensional, finite element model was used along with MARC, a commercially available finite element code, to simulate the fabrication of a diamond-rod TWT. This analysis was conducted by using component and material specifications consistent with actual TWT fabrication and was verified against empirical data. The analysis is nonlinear owing to material plasticity introduced by the forming process and also to geometric nonlinearities presented by the component assembly configuration. The computer model was developed by using the high efficiency, K-band TWT design but is general enough to permit similar analyses to be performed on a wide variety of TWT designs and styles. The results of the TWT operating condition and structural failure mode analysis, as well as a comparison of analytical results to test data are presented.Document ID19910018122Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsBartos, Karen F.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Fite, E. Brian*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Shalkhauser, Kurt A.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Sharp, G. Richard*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1991Subject CategoryCommunications And RadarReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:3081E-5917NASA-TP-3081Accession Number91N27436Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 650-60-20Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910018122.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Alfacell Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kuslima Shogen,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: June 14, 2004


                                        /s/ Kuslima Shogen
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        Name: Kuslima Shogen
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                               (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Alfacell Corporation and will be retained by Alfacell Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


                                     - 32 -
July 1 8 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

EX PARTE RICHARD DEW AYNE JONES
NO. 14

- 12

- 00877

- CR

_____________________________ This court today heard a motion for rehearing filed by APPELLANT. We order that the motion be overruled, this court’s former judgment of June 1 1 , 201 3 , be vacated, set aside, and annulled, and this court’ s opinion of June 1 1, 2013 withdrawn.
This cause wa s heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED , and that this decision be certified below for observance

.
[CAPTION]
<TABLE>


                                               EXHIBIT 11
 
                           Statement Re:  Computation of Per Share Earnings
 
 
 
 
 
                                                           Three Months Ended                 Nine Months Ended
                                                        -------------------------        --------------------------
                                                         09/30/98        09/30/97          09/30/98        09/30/97
                                                        ---------       ---------        ----------      ----------
<S>                                                     <C>             <C>              <C>             <C>
Basic:
    Average shares outstanding:                         1,767,064       1,767,064         1,767,064       1,765,651
 
    Net effect of the assumed exercise
    of stock options-based on the
    treasury stock method using
    average stock prices                                        0               0                 0           1,444
                                                        ---------       ---------        ----------      ----------
             Total                                      1,767,064       1,767,064         1,767,064       1,767,095
                                                        =========       =========        ==========      ==========
Net income                                               $598,553        $541,757        $1,738,125      $1,791,192
                                                        =========       =========        ==========      ==========
Net income per share                                        $0.34           $0.31             $0.98           $1.01
                                                        =========       =========        ==========      ==========
 
 
 
 
Diluted:
    Average shares outstanding:                         1,767,064       1,767,064         1,767,064       1,765,651
 
    Net effect of the assumed exercise
    of stock options based on the
    treasury stock method using
    average market  price or period
    end market price, whichever is higher                   2,420               0             2,125           1,444
                                                        ---------       ---------        ----------      ----------
             Total                                      1,769,484       1,767,064         1,769,189       1,767,095
                                                        =========       =========        ==========      ==========
Net income                                               $598,553        $541,757        $1,738,125      $1,791,192
                                                        =========       =========        ==========      ==========
Net income per share                                        $0.34           $0.31             $0.98           $1.01


</TABLE>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-01-1998
<CASH>                                           4,979,330
<SECURITIES>                                     1,054,138
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,373,130
<ALLOWANCES>                                       566,065
<INVENTORY>                                      3,570,871
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,780,814
<PP&E>                                          25,186,168
<DEPRECIATION>                                     859,724
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 117,939,513
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,511,743
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,651,867
<COMMON>                                        84,229,597
<OTHER-SE>                                      (2,855,518)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   117,939,513
<SALES>                                         25,559,496
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,559,496
<CGS>                                          (16,231,335)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   (7,201,566)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (242,519)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,031,619
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,001,222
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,030,397
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .11
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
21






Subsidiaries
of PNM Resources, Inc.






As of
December 31, 2008, PNM Resources, Inc. directly or indirectly owns all of the
voting securities of the following subsidiaries:




Public
Service Company of New Mexico, a New Mexico corporation that does business under
the names “Public Service Company of New Mexico” and “PNM”.




Texas-New
Mexico Power Company, a Texas corporation that does business under the name
“Texas-New Mexico Power Company” and “TNMP”.




First
Choice Power Special Purpose, LP, a Texas limited partnership that does business
under its partnership name.




First
Choice Power, LP, a Texas limited partnership that does business under its
partnership name.




FCP
Enterprises Inc., a Delaware corporation that does business under its corporate
name.




TNP
Enterprises, Inc., a Texas corporation that does business under its corporate
name.





The
remaining subsidiaries of PNM Resources, Inc. considered in the aggregate as a
single subsidiary, do not constitute a "significant subsidiary" (as defined in
Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X) as of the end of the year covered by this
report.