alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Petition of J. Edward Simmons et al., Constituting the Board of Water Supply of the City of New York, Appellants, to Acquire Real Property Required in the Construction of Hillview Reservoir. Arabella D. Huntington et al., as Executors of Collis P. Huntington, Deceased, Respondents.

*Matter of*Simmons, 141 App. Div. 120, affirmed.

(Argued May 29, 1911;

decided June 13, 1911.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered •November 18, 1910, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion to confirm a report of commissioners of appraisal in condemnation proceedings and directing a new appraisal before new commissioners.

*Archibald R. Watson, Corporation Counsel*(H. *T. Dykman*of counsel), for appellants.

*Tompkins McIlvaine, Herbert Parsons*and *Albert Southard Wright*for respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Chase and Collin, JJ.
Exhibit 24-10



POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, John W. Rogers, Jr. do hereby appoint John W. Rowe and Randall E. Mehrberg, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange
Commission report on Form 10-K for 2004 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully
and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.



/s/    JOHN W. ROGERS,
JR.John W. Rogers, Jr.




DATE:
February 23, 2005
§ 33.44 Instances where assistance may not be provided. Special priorities assistance is provided at the discretion of the Department of Transportation or the Delegate Agencies, when it is determined that such assistance is warranted to meet the objectives of this part. Examples where assistance may not be provided include situations when a person is attempting to: ( a ) Secure a price advantage;
( b ) Obtain delivery prior to the time required to fill a rated order;
( c ) Gain competitive advantage;
( d ) Disrupt an industry apportionment program in a manner designed to provide a person with an unwarranted share of scarce items; or
( e ) Overcome a supplier's regularly established terms of sale or conditions of doing business.
,^Ͳϭ

,ŝŐŚ^ƉĞĞĚDŝdžĞƌ

ŽǁůĞƐďůĂĚĞ

LJĞ

ZĞƐŝŶ^ŽůƵƚŝŽŶ ůŽĐŬĞĚĐŝĚ

ĞĨŽĂŵĞƌ

DDͲϭ

DĞĚŝĂDŝůů

&Ͳϭ

Ͳϭ͘&ƵŐŝƚŝǀĞŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐ

t^ͲϮ͘tĂƐƚĞtĂƚĞƌůĞĂŶŽƵƚ

t^ͲϮ͘tĂƐƚĞtĂƚĞƌůĞĂŶŽƵƚ

ϳκϬůď^Žd

&ƌŽŵρŐĂůůŽŶƉĂŝůƐ

κϬϬůďtŝŶŽŶͲϭ

&ƌŽŵρŐĂůůŽŶƉĂŝůƐ

κϬůďŝƐƉĞůĂŝƌ&κε

ĨƌŽŵρŐĂůůŽŶƉĂŝů

ϮΘϮϬůďĐƌLJůŝĐZĞƐŝŶ

^ŽůƵƚŝŽŶ

ĨƌŽŵρρŐĂůůŽŶĚƌƵŵƐ

͘ůĞŶĚŝŶŐŵĂƚĞƌŝĂů t^Ͳϭ͘ƵƐƚŽůůĞĐƚŽƌ

͘ŚĂƌŐĞZĂǁDĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ

͘ĂƚĐŚdƌĂŶƐĨĞƌ

͘DŝůůŝŶŐ

͘&ŝůƚĞƌͬWĂĐŬ

t^Ͳϯ͘ĂƵƐƚŝĐ^ŽůƵƚŝŽŶͬtĂƐŚtĂƚĞƌ

Code Process Description/ Comments

Duration 

hr/batch

A Charge Raw Materials Exposure and Emission point during dye addition 1.5

B Blending Materials Homogenizing raw materials in covered vessel 0.5

C Batch Transfer Trasnferring vessel from HS mixer to media mill 0.17

D Milling De-agglomerating dye 3

E Filter/ Pack Finished material is filtered, packed and shipped to customer 1

Code Description Emission Quantity

E-1** Fugitive Emission .073 lb/batch 1

WS-1*** Dust Collector .661 lb/batch 1

WS-2 Waste Water Cleanout 2

WS-3 Casutic Solution/ Waste Water 1

ΎΎ&ƵŐŝƚŝǀĞŵŝƐƐŝŽŶĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚƵƐŝŶŐĨĂĐƚŽƌƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶEŽƌƚŚůĂŬĞƉůĂŶƚϮϬϭϮdZ/

WƌŽĐĞƐƐŝĂŐƌĂŵ͗tĂƚĞƌĂƐĞĚ^ƵŶ>ĂƐĞWƌŽĚƵĐƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚ^ŽdĚLJĞ

ΎΎΎƵƐƚŽůůĞĐƚŝŽŶŶŽƚƚĂďƵůĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚEŽŶͲ ŚĂnjĂƌĚŽƵƐŽƌŚĂnjĂƌĚŽƵƐǁĂƐƚĞŝŶdZ/ʹ

ĐŽƵŶƚĞĚƚŽǁĂƌĚƐĞŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ

Raw Material Est. Addition 

time (min)

Acrylic Resin Solution 60

WinCon-1 12

DispelAir CF49 5

SABoTBA 20

ϮΘϮϬůďĐƌLJůŝĐZĞƐŝŶ

^ŽůƵƚŝŽŶ

ĨƌŽŵρρŐĂůůŽŶĚƌƵŵƐ

κϬϬ ůďtŝŶŽŶͲϭ

&ƌŽŵρŐĂůůŽŶƉĂŝůƐ

κϬůďŝƐƉĞůĂŝƌ&κε

ĨƌŽŵρŐ Ɖ ĂůůŽŶƉĂŝů

ϳκϬ ůď ^Žd

&ƌŽŵρŐĂůůŽŶƉĂŝůƐ Ő Ɖ

ůŽĐŬĞĚĐŝĚ

LJĞ

ZĞƐŝŶ^ŽůƵƚŝŽŶ

ĞĨŽĂŵĞ

Acrylic Resin Solution 60

WinCon-1 12

DispelAir CF49 5

SABoTBA 20

.073 lb/batch 1

.661 lb/batch 1

2

1

EŽƌƚŚůĂŬĞƉůĂŶƚϮϬϭϮ

1.5

0

0.17

0.5

3

1

^ƵŶ>ĂƐĞ ^Žd
ĂƐŝƐŽĨ&ƵŐŝƚŝǀĞŵŝƐƐŝŽŶĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶ

&ĂĐƚŽƌƐƵƐĞĚĂƌĞƚĂŬĞŶĨƌŽŵƚŚĞŝŶĐĐŽŵƉŽƵŶĚ;ĚƌLJͿĞŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐĂƐĂŶĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĨŽƌĚƌLJƉŽǁĚĞƌĚLJĞ

ĞŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐ͘

Ͳ hŶĐŽŶƚƌŽůůĞĚĞŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐс͘ϭй

Ͳ ƵƐƚĐŽůůĞĐƚŽƌĞŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐĐĂƉƚƵƌĞĞĨĨŝĐŝĞŶĐLJсεϬй

ͲϭŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐс^Žd;ŬŐͬďĂƚĐŚͿΎ͘ϭйΎ;ϭͲεϬйͿ

t^ͲϭŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐс^Žd;ŬŐͬďĂƚĐŚͿΎ͘ϭйΎεϬй

KƉĞƌĂƚŽƌdžƉŽƐƵƌĞƚŽ^Žd

ƐŝŶŐůĞŽƉĞƌĂƚŽƌŝƐĞdžƉŽƐĞĚƚŽ͘ϬϳϯůďŽĨ^ŽdĚƵƌŝŶŐĂďĂƚĐŚĂĐƌŽƐƐĂϮϬŵŝŶƵƚĞƉĞƌŝŽĚŝŶƚŚĞ

͞ŚĂƌŐĞZĂǁDĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ͟ƉƌŽĐĞƐƐŽĨƚŚĞďĂƚĐŚ͘

ĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůWĞƌƐŽŶĂůWƌŽƚĞĐƚŝǀĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ

E/K^,EͲερƌĂƚĞĚĚƵƐƚŵĂƐŬƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĨŽƌƵƐĞĚƵƌŝŶŐƉŽǁĚĞƌĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘

ƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚWƌŽĚƵĐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƵƐĂŐĞ

ƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚLJĞĂƌůLJƉƌŽĚƵĐƚŝŽŶǀŽůƵŵĞŽĨ^hE>ĂƐĞсϮκϬ͕ϬϬϬůďͬLJĞĂƌ͘

ƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚLJĞĂƌůLJ^ŽdƵƐĂŐĞсκκ͕κϬϬůďͬLJĞĂƌ͘

ƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚďĂƚĐŚĞƐƉĞƌLJĞĂƌсςϬďĂƚĐŚĞƐͬLJĞĂƌ

WĞƌŵŝƚƐ

ůĞĂŶŝƌĐƚWĞƌŵŝƚWƌŽŐƌĂŵ;WWͿ

Ϭϯϭκϳϭ

tĂƐƚĞtĂƚĞƌĨƌŽŵ/ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂůĐƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐ

/>ZϬϬϯϭκς

^Žd;

^Žd

^Žd

^Žd Žd

Ĩ ^hE>ĂƐĞсϮκϬ͕ϬϬϬ

^ŽdƵƐĂŐĞсκκ͕κϬϬ

ςϬď

Ϭϯϭκϳϭ

/>ZϬϬϯϭκς
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

#### § 40.277 Are alcohol tests other than saliva or breath permitted under these regulations?

No, other types of alcohol tests (*e,g.,* blood and urine) are not authorized for testing done under this part. Only saliva or breath for screening tests and breath for confirmation tests using approved devices are permitted.
Exhibit 31.2



Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer







I, Frank Dalene, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Hamptons Luxury Homes, Inc.



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and



c)

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls.



6.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: September 13, 2005



/s/ Frank Dalene



Frank Dalene

Chief Financial Officer
|  | Water Quality Standards                                        Recent                                                                                Additions | Contact                                                                                Us |                                                                                Print                                                                                Version                                                                                Search:                                                                                EPA                                                                                Home > Water > Water                     Science > Water                     Quality Standards > Laws                     & Regulations > Withdrawal of Federal Nutrient                     Standards for the State of Arizona |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

||
||
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Andrew Touchstone, c/o Teri :

Touchstone, :

Petitioners :

:

v. : No. 1336 C.D. 2018

:

Workers' Compensation Appeal :

Board (Touchstone and Associates, :

P.C.), :

Respondent :

O R D E R

NOW, September 23, 2019, upon consideration of Petitioner’s

application for reconsideration/reargument, and Respondent’s answer in 

response thereto, the application is denied.

MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

President Judge
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

 

I, David D. Hillard, Chief Financial Officer of Fisher Communications, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Fisher Communications, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: September 12, 2003
§ 551.59 May the same individual sign both the Designation by Foreign Manufacturer and Acceptance by Agent? ( a ) Generally no; the Designation by Manufacturer must be signed by an official or employee of the foreign manufacturer and the Acceptance by Agent must be signed by the foreign manufacturer's agent, in the case of an individual, or by an official or employee, in the case of a domestic firm or corporation serving as its agent.
( b ) Occasionally an official of a foreign manufacturer also serves as an official of a domestic firm or corporation or is a permanent resident of the United States. In such cases, the official may serve as agent and sign the designation documents both on behalf of the foreign manufacturer and as agent. However, the foreign manufacturer must submit to NHTSA, along with the designation documents, a letter explaining that the individual signing the designation is both an official of the foreign manufacturer with authority to appoint an agent and a permanent resident of the United States or official of a domestic firm or corporation. If NHTSA does not receive an explanatory letter at the same time it receives the designation, the agency will deem the designation insufficient under this subpart and reject the submission.
#### William J. Brown and another, *Appellants, v.*Henry B. Lockwood, *Respondent.*

— Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**SAMUEL THEODORE ROSS,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**HONORABLE CAROLYN CARLUCCIO, JUDGE, MONTGOMERY COUNTY,**  **COURT OF COMMON PLEAS,**

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 66 MM 2015** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 29th day of June, 2015, the Application for Le ave to File Original** 

**Process is** GRANTED **, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is** DENIED **, and the**

**Prothonotary is** DIRECTED **to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.**
#### §§ 553.31-553.33 [Reserved]
§ 604.4 Charter service agreement. ( a ) A recipient seeking Federal assistance under the Federal Transit Laws to acquire or operate any public transportation equipment or facilities shall enter into a “Charter Service Agreement” as set out in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) A recipient shall enter into a Charter Service Agreement if it receives Federal funds for equipment or facilities under the Federal Transit Laws. The terms of the Charter Service Agreement are as follows: “The recipient agrees that it, and each of its subrecipients, and third party contractors at any level who use FTA-funded vehicles, may provide charter service using equipment or facilities acquired with Federal assistance authorized under the Federal Transit Laws only in compliance with the regulations set out in 49 CFR 604, the terms and conditions of which are incorporated herein by reference.”
( c ) The Charter Service Agreement is contained in the Certifications and Assurances published annually by FTA for applicants for Federal financial assistance. Once a recipient receives Federal funds, the Certifications and Assurances become part of its Grant Agreement or Cooperative Agreement for Federal financial assistance.
From: Alfred Collins [mailto:alfredreedcollins@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 6:14 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

NO. Do not even try to control how I invest my money. 

I intend to invest in hard real assets, not government fiat ponzi psudo 

money. 

Surf faster. 

Internet Explorer 8 optmized for Yahoo! auto launches 2 of your favorite pages 

everytime you open your browser.Get IE8 here! (It's free)
#### Mary O’Connor, Respondent, v. The Troy and West Troy Bridge Company, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                    9-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                            JUL-01-1996             JUL-01-1995 
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1996  
<CASH>                                         10,870                       0
<SECURITIES>                                        0                       0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                   5,796                       0  
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (548)                       0
<INVENTORY>                                       574                       0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               18,245                       0   
<PP&E>                                         85,326                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                               (42,173)                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                109,846                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          14,607                       0
<BONDS>                                        20,310                       0
<COMMON>                                            1                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                         0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     41,995                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  109,846                       0
<SALES>                                             0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               51,646                  52,306
<CGS>                                               0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  27,266                  30,066
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                4,223                   4,034
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  141                     970
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2,489                   2,815
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 9,976                   5,728
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (2,302)                   (710)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             4,496                   1,817
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0                       0 
<CHANGES>                                           0                       0   
<NET-INCOME>                                    4,496                   1,817  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .74                     .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .74                     .30 
        
                                  


</TABLE>
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 45747

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

PHILLIP LEE COOLEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Filed: November 8, 2018

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Deborah A. Bail, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period 

of confinement of two years, for felony injury to a child, affirmed. 

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Justin M. Curtis, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; HUSKEY, Judge;

and LORELLO, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM 

Phillip Lee Cooley pled guilty to felony injury to a child. I.C. § 18-1501(1). In exchange 

for his guilty plea, additional charges were dismissed. The district court sentenced Cooley to a 

unified term of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years. Cooley filed an 

I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of his sentence, which the district court denied. Cooley appeals, 

arguing that his sentence is excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 
2

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Cooley’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Exhibit 23.2  Consent of KPMG LLP








Consent of Independent Auditors


The Board of Directors
QVC, Inc.:

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  registration  statements
(Nos.  33-41440,  33-63223,  33-54365,   33-56903,   333-08577,   333-18715  and
333-69709) on Form S-8 and (No. 33-50785) on Form S-3 of Comcast  Corporation of
our report  dated  February 3, 1999,  with respect to the  consolidated  balance
sheets of QVC, Inc. and  subsidiaries  as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the
related  consolidated   statements  of  operations  and  comprehensive   income,
shareholders'  equity,  and cash  flows for each of the years in the  three-year
period ended December 31, 1998 (such consolidated  financial  statements are not
separately presented herein), which report is included as an exhibit to the Form
10-K of Comcast Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1998.



/s/ KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 25, 1999
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 37

Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 13, 2001

Mr. FROST submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating minority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following named Member be, and

2 he is hereby, elected to the following standing committees

3 of the House of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES: Mr. Sanders.

5 COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM: Mr. Sand6 ers.

Æ