alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   February 27, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Patricia K. Collawn                           |
|------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                     |   | Patricia K. Collawn                                                                                                                                                                 |
|                                     |   | President and Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                               |
|                                     |   | Texas-New Mexico Power Company                                                                                                                                                      |

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6650
SHERMAN X. BRANDON; WILL 3X ANDERSON, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, INCORPORATED; EMILE R. CLOUD, Staff Chaplain, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-223-3) Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 14, 1997 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sherman X. Brandon, Will 3X Anderson, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellants appeal the district court's order declining to reconsider the prior order transferring their civil rights action tothe District Court for the District of Columbia. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0781.html[7/21/2015 12:22:46 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-x5fs

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0781

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Thompson Jeffrey

General Comment

I can and AM planning my own retirement !!!! DO NOT mess with it !!!
#### In the Matter of the Application of the New York, West Shore and Buffalo Railway Company to acquire lands owned by William A. Judson and others.

Motion for reargument denied. Leave granted to apply at Special Term for the appointment of new commissioners.
#### Carl Swenson, Respondent, *v.*Norcross Brothers Company, Appellant.

*Swenson*v. *Norcross Brothers Company,*135 App. Div. 914, affirmed.

(Argued March 28, 1911;

decided April 25, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 21, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant, his employer.

*George H. D. Foster*for appellant.

*Martin T. Mantón*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cúllen, Oh. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Chase and Collin, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7567

SHARON RENEE CHABASSOLE,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ROBERT WILLIAM WAZNEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 20-7714

SHARON RENEE CHABASSOLE,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ROBERT WILLIAM WAZNEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Columbia. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:20-cv-02399-HMH)

Submitted: June 29, 2021 Decided: July 1, 2021
2

Before HARRIS, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert William Wazney, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Robert William Wazney seeks to appeal from the 

district court’s orders: (1) denying his “motion to appeal” from the magistrate judge’s 

recommendation and denying his motion for stay, and (2) adopting the report and 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and remanding the underlying domestic 

proceeding back to state court. We dismiss the appeals. Remand orders are generally “not 

reviewable on appeal or otherwise.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d). The Supreme Court has 

explained that the appellate restrictions of “§ 1447(d) must be read in pari materia with 

§ 1447(c), so that only remands based on grounds specified in § 1447(c) [i.e., lack of 

subject matter jurisdiction and defects in removal procedures] are immune from review 

under § 1447(d).” Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca, 516 U.S. 124, 127 (1995). 

Whether a remand order is reviewable is not based on a district court’s explicit citation to 

§ 1447(c); “[t]he bar of § 1447(d) applies to any order invoking substantively one of the 

grounds specified in § 1447(c).” Borneman v. United States, 213 F.3d 819, 824-25 (4th 

Cir. 2000).

Here, the district court remanded the case to the state court after finding that it lacked

subject matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to review the merits of the 

district court’s orders. We deny Wazney’s motion for oral argument via teleconference 

and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
                                                                                         EXHIBIT 12
                        COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
        Computation of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                        (in thousands except ratio data)
                                   <CAPTION>
                                                                 Year Ended December 31,
                                                    1998      1999      2000       2001       2002
<S>                                              <C>       <C>        <C>       <C>        <C>
Fixed Charges:
  Interest on First Mortgage Bonds. . . . . . . . $47,323   $43,207   $40,602    $34,575    $17,756
  Interest on Other Long-term Debt. . . . . . . .  23,594    25,878    25,878     27,365     32,762
  Interest on Short-term Debt . . . . . . . . . .   3,493     2,460     2,412      4,914      3,244
  Miscellaneous Interest Charges. . . . . . . . .   4,459     4,659    14,205      3,755      2,585
  Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals . .   5,300     4,600     5,300      4,800      3,500
       Total Fixed Charges. . . . . . . . . . . . $84,169   $80,804   $88,397    $75,409    $59,847

Earnings:
  Income Before Extraordinary Item    . . . . . .$133,044  $150,270  $120,202   $191,900   $181,173
  Plus Federal Income Taxes . . . . . . . . . . .  71,202    82,686   116,590     94,148     93,484
  Plus State and Local Income Taxes . . . . . . .       3        89       136      8,811     17,519
  Plus Fixed Charges (as above) . . . . . . . . .  84,169    80,804    88,397     75,409     59,847
       Total Earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$288,418  $313,849  $325,325   $370,268   $352,023

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. . . . . . . .    3.42      3.88      3.68       4.91       5.88
</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 Certification Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Michael W. ODonnell, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this Annual Report of Columbia Energy Group on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2004;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: March 9, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Michael W. ODonnellMichael W. ODonnellPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                     3,052
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,052
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,052
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,716
<OTHER-SE>                                         336
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,052
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 672.5 Definitions. As used in this part: *Administrator* means the Federal Transit Administrator or the Administrator's designee.
*Contractor* means an entity that performs tasks on behalf of FTA, a State Safety Oversight Agency, or public transportation agency through contract or other agreement.
*Designated personnel* means: ( 1 ) Employees and contractors identified by a recipient whose job function is directly responsible for safety oversight of the public transportation system of the public transportation agency; or
( 2 ) Employees and contractors of a State Safety Oversight Agency whose job function requires them to conduct safety audits and examinations of the rail fixed guideway public transportation systems subject to the jurisdiction of the agency.
*Directly responsible for safety oversight* means public transportation agency personnel whose primary job function includes the development, implementation and review of the agency's safety plan, and/or the SSOA requirements for the rail fixed guideway public transportation system pursuant to 49 CFR parts 659 or 674.
*Examination* means a process for gathering or analyzing facts or information related to the safety of a public transportation system.
*FTA* means the Federal Transit Administration.
*Public transportation agency* means an entity that provides public transportation service as defined in 49 U.S.C. 5302 and that has one or more modes of service not subject to the safety oversight requirements of another Federal agency.
*Rail fixed guideway public transportation system* means any fixed guideway system as defined in § 674.7 of this chapter.
*Recipient* means a State or local governmental authority, or any other operator of a public transportation system receiving financial assistance under 49 U.S.C. chapter 53.
*Safety audit* means a review or analysis of safety records and related materials, including, but not limited to, those related to financial accounts.
*State* means a State of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Virgin Islands.
*State Safety Oversight Agency (SSOA* ) means an agency established by a State that meets the requirements and performs the functions specified by 49 U.S.C. 5329(e) and the regulations set forth in 49 CFR parts 659 and 674.
Exhibit
23
 
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-50447
and Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration No. 333-54025 of Columbus
Southern Power Company on Form S-3 of our reports dated February 28, 2005 (which
reports express unqualified opinions and include an explanatory paragraph
concerning the adoption of new accounting pronouncements in 2003 and 2004)
relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedules of
Columbus Southern Power Company appearing in and incorporated by reference in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Columbus Southern Power Company for the year
ended December 31, 2004.
  
 /s/
Deloitte & Touche, LLP
 
 Columbus,
Ohio
 March 1,
2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,381
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,627
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,488
<PP&E>                                         108,311
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 122,484
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,993
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           145
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,168
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,313
<SALES>                                         10,855
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,102
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,364
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,943
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,087
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,292)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (21,292)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (21,292)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.52)


</TABLE>
----

| Name of Subsidiary                |   | State of Incorporation |   | I.D. Number |
|-----------------------------------|--------|------------------------|--------|-------------|
|                              |   |                   |   |        |
| Universal      Supply Group, Inc. |   | New      York          |   | 11-3391045  |
|                              |   |                   |   |        |
| The      RAL Supply Group, Inc.   |   | New      York          |   | 20-0207168  |
|                              |   |                   |   |        |
| S&A      Supply, Inc.         |   | New      York          |   | 26-0778121  |

----
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1107.html[7/22/2015 11:12:42 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-2kji

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1107

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Bobby Knickerbocker

Organization: Freedom Works

General Comment

I prefer to make my own retirement plans. I don't need any help from the government.
§ 39.105 How must PVOs respond to written complaints? ( a ) As a PVO, you must respond to written complaints received by any means (*e.g.,* letter, fax, e-mail, electronic instant message) concerning matters covered by this Part.
( b ) A passenger making a written complaint, must state whether he or she had contacted a CRO in the matter, provide the name of the CRO and the date of the contact, if available, and enclose any written response received from the CRO.
( c ) As a PVO, you are not required to respond to a complaint from a passenger postmarked or transmitted more than 45 days after the date of the incident.
( d ) As a PVO, you must make a dispositive written response to a written disability complaint within 30 days of its receipt. The response must specifically admit or deny that a violation of this part has occurred. The response must be effectively communicated to the recipient. ( 1 ) If you admit that a violation has occurred, you must provide to the complainant a written statement setting forth a summary of the facts and the steps, if any, you will take in response to the violation.
( 2 ) If you deny that a violation has occurred, your response must include a summary of the facts and your reasons, under this Part, for the determination.
( 3 ) Your response must also inform the complainant of his or her right to pursue DOT or DOJ enforcement action under this part, as applicable. DOT has enforcement authority under Title II of the ADA for public entities and under section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act for entities that receive Federal financial assistance; DOJ has enforcement authority under Title III of the ADA for private entities.
From: Pat Worthington [mailto:pchw01@bellsouth.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 9:03 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

TO: Treasury Dept 

FROM: Patricia Worthington 

 7375 SW 170 Ter 

 Miami, FL 33157 

The proposal to annuitize 401K and IRA plans is unacceptable. It seems to be a socialist plan to 

increase mediocrity in the general population – something we need no more of. Considering the 

government has done such a terrible job of handling tax money – it would be ludicrous to give 

them any more.
#### § 6.3 Applicability.

Section 6.9(a) applies to any adversary adjudication pending before the Department on or after October 1, 1981. In addition, applicants for awards must also meet the standards of § 6.9(b) for any adversary adjudication commenced on or after March 29, 1996.

[62 FR 19233, Apr. 21, 1997]