alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration
 AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Department of Health and Human Services.
 ACTION: Notice of award.
 SUMMARY: HRSA will award $2 million in PEPFAR funding for work in DRC to strengthen pre-service education primarily focusing on nursing and midwifery competencies through student clinical rotations and community health work.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carla Haddad, Director, Office of Global Health, HRSA, 
                        *chaddad@hrsa.gov*
                         and (301) 443-4551.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  *Intended Recipient of the Award:*
                     Johns Hopkins Program for International Education in Gynecology and Obstetrics (JHPIEGO) Global Reach II Program UH6OA45170. *Amount of Awards:*
                     Two awards, $400,000 for Q4 FY2023 and $1,600,000 for Q1-Q4 FY 2024, totaling $2,000,000. *Project Period:*
                     July 1, 2023-September 30, 2024. *CFDA Number:*
                     93.266. *Award Instrument:*
                     Cooperative Agreement Supplement. *Authority:*Public Law 108-25 (the United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria Act of 2003) [22 U.S.C. 7601 
                    *et seq.*], Public Law 110-293 and Public Law 113-56.
                    ( print page 57125) Table 1—Recipients and Award Amounts
Grant No.
Award recipient name
Country
Award amountUH6OA45170
JHPIEGO Global Reach II
DRC
$400,000UH6OA45170
JHPIEGO Global Reach II
DRC
1,600,000
 *Justification:*
                     DRC continues to face severe shortages of nurses and nurse-midwives for HIV prevention, care and treatment and essential health services, and this award is critical for HIV epidemic control and health security in DRC. The recipient is implementing similar efforts to strengthen the health workforce in other countries (Uganda, Ethiopia, and Zambia) with strong progress and outcomes. Carole Johnson, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2023-18001 Filed 8-21-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
# U.S. Central Command hosts Regional Cooperation exercise

/ Published Sept. 10, 2018

Sept. 10, 2018

Release Number 201800910-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

TAMPA, Fla. – U.S. Central Command is hosting the annual, multinational exercise Regional Cooperation 2018 at Camp Edwards on Joint Base Cape Cod, Massachusetts, Sept 10-21.

More than 200 participants from Afghanistan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, and observers from Kazakhstan will focus on stability operations, border security, counter terrorism, counter narcotics, and counter proliferation during this exercise.  

The multi-national team will develop a combined military response to several exercise scenarios to promote cooperation and interoperability, build functional capacity and enhance responsiveness between multi-national organizations.  RC-18 includes support from the Massachusetts Army National Guard.  

“This exercise provides our militaries the opportunity to work together, build trust and enhance our capabilities, while strengthening our partnerships,” said Lt. Col. Earl Brown, a U.S. CENTCOM spokesman.

This exercise series has been conducted annually since 2001; the last Regional Cooperation was hosted by Tajikistan July 10-23, 2017, in Dushanbe, Tajikistan. 

Questions about RC-18 may be directed to the U.S. Central Command Media Desk at (813) 529-0220 or centcomcccimediadesk@mail.mil.”

 -30-
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                           4,617
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  508,777
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,000
<INVENTORY>                                    391,728
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               914,183
<PP&E>                                         333,718
<DEPRECIATION>                                 271,533
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 985,034
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          242,174
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       140,153
<OTHER-SE>                                     600,526
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   985,034
<SALES>                                        570,056
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               570,056
<CGS>                                          200,125
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  190,475
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               118,158
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,436
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 58,911
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             58,911
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    58,911
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        


</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 25, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50918

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ISAAC POWELL,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

Before JONES, Chief Judge, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge:

Because this court lacksjurisdiction in this case, we dismiss petitioner’s claims. We also hold

that court-appointed counsel are not required to file Anders briefs in frivolous appeals from nonappealable orders.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Isaac Powell was under supervised release arising out of a previous counterfeit security

conviction when the government requested a blood sample pursuant to the DNAAct. Powell initially

refused, but after discussions with the district court judge who warned Powell that if he did not

submit the blood sample he could face revocation of hissupervised release, he relented and provided
2

the sample to the government. Powell challenges the constitutionality of the DNA Act in this appeal.

DISCUSSION

Powell challenges the constitutionality of the DNA Act which, despite Powell’s attempted

argumentsto the contrary, is wellsettled. See Groceman v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 354 F.3d

411, 413 (5th Cir. 2004).

Because Powell appeals from a non-appealable order, this court lacks jurisdiction. Federal

appellate courts have jurisdiction over three types of appeals: (1) final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291; (2)

certain specific types of interlocutory appeals, 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a); and (3) an appeal in which the

district court has certified the question as final pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), 28 U.S.C. §

1292(b). See Dardar v. Lafourche Realty Co., Inc., 848 F.2d 955, 957 (5th Cir. 1998).

Powell’s attorney has filed an Anders brief. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), set

guidelinesfor whencourt-appointed attorneys canwithdrawfromfrivolous appeals. Court-appointed

attorneys who wish to withdraw because theyrepresent indigent clients who want to pursue frivolous

appeals must undertake a “conscientious” examination of the case, request permission to withdraw

and, submit a “brief referring to anything in the record that might arguably support the appeal.”

Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. 

There is no Anders duty in situations such as this where defendant seeks an appeal of a nonappealable order over which this court has no jurisdiction. Such situations implicate none of the

concerns underlying the Andersframework as no jurisdiction for an appeal even exists. Additionally,

the duty to fulfill the Anders requirements is only recognized in situations where defendants have a

constitutionalright to counsel. See Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987). Thus, courtappointed counsel can withdraw in situationslike these without fulfilling the requirements ofAnders.
3

CONCLUSION

The appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. 

DISMISSED.
U.S., UK to maintain close ties in ISIL fight
 
  
  **WASHINGTON (June 24, 2016)  —**
Defense Secretary Ash Carter told his United Kingdom counterpart 
State Secretary for Defense Michael Fallon  that 
the two nations will always enjoy a special relationship reflected in 
close defense ties — a bedrock of U.S. security and foreign policy, 
Pentagon Press Secretary Peter Cook told reporters here Friday. “The secretary reaffirmed that those bonds endure after 
yesterday's vote by the United Kingdom to exit the European Union,” Cook
 told reporters. Cook also updated reporters on counter-Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant efforts in Syria and Iraq. Cook added that Carter emphasized the United States' 
“unshakeable commitment to NATO, of which the United Kingdom is a vital 
member, and to the vision we share with our allies, the United Kingdom, 
and other European nations.” Carter welcomed Fallon's commitment to continuing the United 
Kingdom's active and enduring role in global security issues, Cook said,
 and its work within NATO and efforts to accelerate the lasting defeat 
of ISIL, in particular. “The two leaders committed to work together to strengthen 
international partnerships that have helped ensure security for the 
United States, the United Kingdom, Europe and the world,” Cook said. “We
 will see that close work together continues in next month's NATO summit
 in Warsaw, and it's on display every day in the fight against ISIL.” **Arab-led Forces Push Into Manbij** Turning to the fight to defeat ISIL, Cook said despite 
continued enemy resistance in the Syrian city of Manbij, Arab-led forces
 have begun pushing into the city, which they’ve surrounded on all sides
 while conducting clearing operations of ISIL forces on the city’s 
outskirts. Over the past 24 hours near Manbij, Cook said, eight coalition 
airstrikes against ISIL assets have struck seven of its tactical units, 
destroying six fighting positions and two vehicles. Since the ground 
operation to assault Manbij began four weeks ago, coalition forces have 
conducted 246 strikes in support of local ground forces, he added. “Cutting off ISIL's access through Manbij means taking away 
[one of its] major foreign fighter hubs. It's also an important step in 
our coalition's push toward ultimately targeting ISIL's self-proclaimed 
capital in Raqqa,” Cook said. **More Than 70 Percent of Fallujah Cleared** And in Fallujah, Iraq, government forces have cleared more than
 70 percent of the city, Cook said. And in five weeks since ground 
operations began to retake the city from ISIL control, he added, 
coalition forces have conducted 100 airstrikes in support of Iraqi 
ground forces. “The loss of Fallujah will further deny [ISIL] access to a 
province critically important to its overall goals. It will also reduce 
their ability to threaten civilians in Baghdad,” Cook told reporters. 
“And, of course, all of these operations are being enabled by a global 
coalition of nations united in the fight against ISIL -- the U.K. 
[being] among the integral members of that coalition and a stalwart ally
 of the United States.”
#### Charles G. S. Baker, Appellant, v. Jarvis S. Baker, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Opinions by

Dykman and Pratt, JJ.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
**Exhibit 31.1**

CERTIFICATION 

   I, L. Leon Patterson, certify that: 

1.      I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc.;

2.      Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.      Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.      The registrant'sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a)    designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)    evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)    disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.      The registrant'sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant'sauditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or personsfulfilling the equivalent functions): 

(a)    all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and 

(b)    any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 9, 2004

/s/      L. Leon Patterson                          L. Leon PattersonChairman and Chief Executive OfficerPalmetto Bancshares, Inc.
§ 24.202 Applicability. The requirements in this subpart apply to the relocation of any permanently or temporarily displaced person, as defined at § 24.2(a). Any person who qualifies as a permanently or temporarily displaced person must be fully informed of his or her rights and entitlements to relocation assistance and payments provided by the Uniform Act and this part. (*See* appendix A to this part, section 24.202.) ( a ) *Persons required to move temporarily.* ( 1 ) Appropriate notices must be provided in accordance with § 24.203 and appropriate advisory services must be provided in accordance with § 24.205;
( 2 ) For persons occupying a dwelling, at least one comparable dwelling, is made available prior to requiring a person to move, except in the case of an emergency move as described in § 24.204(b)(1), (2), or (3) (see appendix A, to this part, section 24.202);
( 3 ) Similarly, if a person's business will be shut down due to a project which either requires the occupant to vacate the property or which denies physical access to the property, it may be temporarily relocated and reimbursed for all reasonable out of pocket expenses or must be determined to be permanently displaced at the agency's option;
( 4 ) Payment is provided for all out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the temporary relocation as the agency determines to be reasonable and necessary, associated with comparable replacement dwelling, and incidental to selecting a temporary comparable replacement dwelling. Such payments may include the reasonable and necessary costs of temporarily moving personal property from the real property and returning to the real property. Storage of the personal property may be allowed when approved by the displacing agency;
( 5 ) A person's temporary move from their dwelling or business for the project may not exceed 12 months. The agency must contact any person who has temporarily moved from their dwelling or business when that temporary move has lasted for a period beyond 12 months because that person is considered permanently displaced and eligible as a displaced person. The agency shall offer such eligible persons all required relocation assistance benefits and services for permanently displaced persons. An agency may not deduct any temporary relocation assistance benefits previously provided when determining permanent relocation benefits eligibility; and
( 6 ) A person who is not lawfully present in the United States and who has been determined to be ineligible for relocation assistance in accordance with § 24.208 is not eligible for temporary relocation assistance unless such denial of benefits would create an extremely unusual hardship to a designated family member in accordance with § 24.208(h).
( b ) [Reserved]
#### John McMahon, *Appellant, v.*The Port Henry Iron Ore Company of Lake Champlain, *Respondent.*

*—*Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Boardman, J.;

Bookes, J., taking no part.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice
 On August 18, 2023, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed consent decree with the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the lawsuit entitled 
                    *United States*
                     v. 
                    *Mark Ford, Mark Ford Stables, Inc., Mark Ford Stage Road Property, Inc., and Ford Equine Ltd.,*
                     Civil Action No. 19 Civ. 9600. The United States filed this lawsuit seeking injunctive relief and civil penalties for violations of the Clean Water Act resulting from the defendants' unpermitted filling of wetlands and channelization of streams, unpermitted discharge of process wastewater and other pollutants from a Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation, and violation of the terms of a construction stormwater permit. The consent decree requires the defendant to perform injunctive relief, including the restoration of approximately eighteen acres of wetlands and the restoration of two streams, and to pay a $200,000.00 civil penalty. The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and should refer to 
                    *United States*
                     v. 
                    *Mark Ford, et al.,*
                     D.J. Ref. No. 90-5-1-1-11797. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be submitted either by email or by mail: *To submit comments:*
*Send them to:*By email
*pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov.*By mail
Assistant Attorney General, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.
 During the public comment period, the consent decree may be examined and downloaded at this Justice Department website: 
                    *http://www.justice.gov/​enrd/​consent-decrees.*
                     We will provide a paper copy of the consent decree upon written request and payment of reproduction costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611. Please enclose a check or money order for $7.75 (25 cents per page 
                    ( print page 57970)
                    reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury. Patricia McKenna, Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.


[FR Doc. 2023-18198 Filed 8-23-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
Exhibit 10.63


 


FIRST AMENDMENT

TO

PLACEMENT AGENCY AGREEMENT


 


This First Amendment
(“First Amendment”) to the Placement Agency Agreement dated as of February 13,
2004 (the “Agreement”) is by and between MFIC Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (“Company”) and Casimir Capital L.P., a Delaware corporation
(“Placement Agent”).  Terms not defined
herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Agreement.


 


The parties have agreed
to amend Section 3(d) of the Agreement by striking the words “eight percent (8%)”
and inserting in place thereof “seven percent (7%)”.


 


The Agreement, as amended
hereby, shall continue in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties hereto have caused this First Amendment to be executed by their duly
authorized representatives as of this        day
of March, 2004.


 


 


	
  MFIC
  CORPORATION

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Irwin J. Gruverman, Chairman and

  Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  CASIMIR
  CAPITAL L.P.

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Matthew R. McGovern, Managing Director
----

(2004/C 84 E/0373)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0164/04

by Christopher Heaton-Harris (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(29 January 2004)

Subject:   Commission's accounting systems

I understand the Internal Audit Service, in a report entitled ‘IAS Review of the Commission's Accounting Framework — Final Report’ dated 15 April 2003, made a number of recommendations to the Commission regarding the accounting systems.

Has the Commission imposed a high level of quality control over financial data and the accompanying explanatory texts as recommended by the IAS?

Has the terminology used in respect of financial data been simplified as recommended by the ECA?

----