alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DIA report confirms the Houthis’ use of Iranian missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles to conduct attacks across the Middle East 

/ Published Feb. 6, 2024
JOINT BASE ANACOSTIA-BOLLING, 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEFebruary 6, 2024DIA report confirms the Houthis’ use of Iranian missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles to conduct attacks across Middle EastJOINT BASE ANACOSTIA-BOLLING — Analysis confirms that Houthi forces have employed various Iranian-origin missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles against military and civilian targets throughout the region, according to an unclassified report released today by the Defense Intelligence Agency.“Iran: Enabling Houthi Attacks Across the Middle East” provides a comparative analysis of publicly available images of Iranian missiles and UAVs to those displayed and employed by Houthi forces in Yemen to attack commercial shipping in the Red Sea and civilian and port infrastructure across the region.The report highlights the evolving and strengthening relationship between the Houthis and Iran. Since 2014, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Qods Force (IRGC-QF) has provided the Houthis a growing arsenal of sophisticated weapons and training. Iran’s aid has enabled the Houthis to conduct a campaign of missile and UAV attacks against commercial shipping in the Red Sea since November 2023, threatening freedom of navigation and international commerce in one of the world’s most critical waterways.DIA has released the report as part of ongoing transparency efforts to enhance public understanding of the Defense Intelligence Agency’s mission and to provide insights on Department of Defense and national security issues. Information within the report is considered current as of January 17, 2024.Media may direct queries about the report to DIA Public Affairs at dia-pao@dodiis.mil.LINK to report: https://www.dia.mil/Military-Power-Publications

*DIA’s mission is to provide intelligence on foreign militaries to prevent and decisively win wars.**DIA officers are united in a common vision — to be the indispensable source of defense intelligence expertise for the Nation. For 60**years, DIA has met the full range of security challenges faced by the United States. DIA intelligence officers operate around the world, supporting customers from forward-deployed warfighters to national policymakers.*
#### Commonwealth, Appellant, *v.*Falk

(No. 2).

February 24, 1915:

Opinion by

Orlady, J.,

For the reasons given in Com. v. Falk, No. 90, October Term, 1914, ante, p. 217, the judgment in this case is reversed and the record remitted to the court below with a procedendo.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 393 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 393

            Concerning the rise in anti-Semitism in Europe.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 18, 2002

  Mr. Crowley (for himself, Mr. Hastings of Florida, Mr. Tom Davis of 
    Virginia, Mr. Lantos, Mrs. McCarthy of New York, Mr. Engel, Mr. 
 Ackerman, Mrs. Maloney of New York, Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island, Mr. 
   Nadler, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Weiner, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Berman, Mr. 
  Israel, Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Hilliard, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Rodriguez, Mr. 
Holt, Ms. Eshoo, Ms. Berkley, Mr. Langevin, Mr. Waxman, Ms. Schakowsky, 
   Mr. Capuano, Mr. King, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Larson of Connecticut, Mr. 
   Sanders, Mr. Deutsch, Mrs. Lowey, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Frost, and Mr. 
 Blumenauer) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
            Concerning the rise in anti-Semitism in Europe.

Whereas there has been a significant rise in anti-Semitic attacks on Jewish 
        people and Jewish institutions in Europe during the last 18 months;
Whereas the continued violence in the Middle East has fueled anti-Semitic 
        sentiments in Europe;
Whereas on March 31, 2002, the Or Aviv synagogue in Marseille, France, was 
        burned to the ground by anti-Semitic arsonists;
Whereas on March 30, 2002, Shneur Zalman Teldon and Zev Goldberg, Yeshiva 
        students from New Jersey, were brutally beaten on the streets of Berlin, 
        Germany, in an anti-Semitic attack;
Whereas in April 2002, supporters of Swiss Ambassador to Germany, Thomas Borer, 
        alleged that he was removed from his post as a result of a ``Jewish 
        plot'' against him;
Whereas in Belgium, many anti-Semitic attacks have been reported against Jewish 
        institutions including a gasoline bomb attack on a Brussels synagogue;
Whereas on April 11, 2002 in Bondy, France, fifteen hooded attackers wielding 
        sticks and metal bars assaulted a teen-age soccer team from the Maccabi 
        Bondy association after making anti-Semitic remarks; and
Whereas anti-Semitic attacks have impacted every nation in Europe: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) the governments of Europe should take all necessary 
        steps to protect the safety and well-being of their respective 
        Jewish communities; and
            (2) the governments of Europe should make a concerted 
        effort to cultivate an atmosphere of cooperation and 
        reconciliation among the Jewish and non-Jewish residents of 
        Europe.
                                 <all>
```
.-PARTfv^ENTOF 

^ANSPORWION 

•:/'L!0FERATI0M3 

SERVED APRIL 20, 2011 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

WEBC O Aircraft Compan y 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP09CE0001 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2009-0839 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

On August 19, 2009, the Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter referred to as 

"Complainant") filed a Complaint. On August 11, 2009, (hereinafter referred to as "Respondent") 

filed a Request for Hearing. 

On April 12, 2011, Complainant requested that its Complaint be withdrawn. 

14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney may 

withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing without the consent of 

the administrative lawjudge. If an agency attorney withdraws the complaint or a party 

withdraws the request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss 

the proceedings under this subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, the within filed Request to Withdraw Complaint having been read and 

considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. Complainant's Request to Withdraw Complaint be and is hereby granted; and 

2. This proceeding be £ind is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

^ 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachments - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP09CE0001 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention; Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Robert Weber, President 

Webco Aircraft Company, Respondent 

1134 N.Oliver Road 

Newton, KS 67114-9446 

Edward A. McConwell, Respondent's Counsel 

McConwell Law Offices 

5925 Beverly 

Mission, KS 66202 

TEL: 913-262-0605 

FAX: 913-262-0652 

David Kessler, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, ACE-7, Central Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

DOT Building, 901 Locust. Room 506 

Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 

TEL: 816-329-3763 

FAX: 816-329-3771 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El 2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor: 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant: 202-366-5121 

FAX; 202-366-7536 

' Servicewasby U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration. 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Buildingr-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC430. *^
<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 11

Southampton Partners, Inc.

EPS Calculations for period December 31, 2001 to March 31, 2002

Basic                    ($.036)

Diluted                  ($.036)




                                      -11-








<PAGE>




FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

Table 3

The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.

                                                      3-MOS Ended
                                                     March 31, 2002
                                                   ------------------
Net Loss                                                 35,979
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses                   (47,684)
Total stockholders' equity                              (35,979)
Primary Earnings Per Common Share                         (.036)
Fully Diluted Earnings Per Common Share                   (.036)




                                      -12-
-----Original Message----- 

From: John Metcalf [mailto:metcalfj@mvn.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 12:13 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 

re: RIN 1210-AB33 

Please consider these comments in regard to the abjectly vile proposals 

under consideration at DOL and Treasury in regard to conversion of 401 

K plans into annuity-like products. 

1) The reason people don't annuitize during the accumulation phase of 

401 K and IRA participation is that historically, this would be the 

worst possible decision. One would surrender all flexibility for what 

is a guaranteed future payment of unknown nominal and real value. 

Simply put, the payout of an annuity can only be calculated on the 

basis of annuitant's age at first payment and value of funds in the 

account. A worker who does not know when s/he will retire nor their 

funds available at that point would be locking up their wealth in 

exchange for an unknown future payment. The company that holds the 

pension funds would charge for this "service" and for the "guarantee", 

lowering returns below market rates. 

2) In order for a pension company to guarantee an income stream, it 

invests heavily in Treasury bonds. With interest rates at historical 

lows, there are high odds that the underlying investments will lose 

value when interest rates normalize. Thus, 401 k participants would be 

pushed into a poor investment. 

3) There can be no guarantee that the value of eventual payments will 

not be diminished, or even eliminated, by future inflation. 

4) It is not the proper function of Treasury nor Department of Labor 

to steer 401 k participants into any particular investment by requiring 

a "default choice" of investment vehicles. Please note that "default" 

has two meanings. 

5) This is a thinly disguised attempt to dump Treasury bonds on the 

American people, occasioned by lack of buying interest from China, 

Japan, and other nations during a time when Treasury will borrow 

massively. As Treasury borrows ever more, interest rates will rise, 

diminishing value to the bondholder. 

6) Department of Labor should be soliciting comments on whether there 

should continue to be a Department of Labor. Its initiatives, 

including this one, are malevolent. It seeks to stir up up class 

warfare. It publishes heavily massaged statistics which are grossly 

inaccurate. It compels public funding of what is essentially a 

political agenda. Department of Labor needs to be abolished before it 

can advance this, or any of its other work products. 

Sincerely, 

John C. Metcalf 

15210 N. Morton Lane 
Mt. Vernon, IL 62864 

cc: Representative John Shimkus 

 Senator Roland Burris 

 Senator Dick Durbin
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000022198
<NAME> COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,882,984
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     24,069
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         178,570
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        70,274
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 385,689
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,541,586
<COMMON>                                        41,026
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      574,709
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             99,582
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 715,317
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           25,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           882,641
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              20,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  31,800
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   14,640
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                       50,000
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     30,520
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 5,614
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 766,054
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,541,586
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,105,683
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            62,806
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     857,330
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     920,136
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        185,547
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                (970)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 184,577
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        77,469
<NET-INCOME>                                   107,108
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      6,029
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  101,079
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        75,876
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       59,711
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         259,088
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1> All common stock owned by parent company; no EPS required.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Heritage Worldwide, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350:





(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      November 14, 2008
              /s/ Claude
      CoutyClaude
      Couty
                Chief
      Financial Officer and General Manager
                (Principal
      Accounting and Financial Officer)
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 29 April 2004

in Case C-372/97: Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (1)

(State aid - Transport of goods by road - Effect on trade between Member States and distortion of competition - Conditions for exemption from the prohibition set out in Article 92(1) of the EC Treaty (now, following amendment, Article 87(1) EC) - Existing aid or new aid - Principles of reasonableness and of the protection of legitimate expectations - Mo)

(2004/C 118/02)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-372/97: Italian Republic (Agents: I. M. Braguglia, assisted by O. Fiumara), with an address for service in Luxembourg, v Commission of the European Communities (Agents: P. Nemitz and P. Stancanelli, assisted by M. Moretto), with an address for service in Luxembourg — application for annulment in part of Commission Decision 98/182/EC of 30 July 1997 concerning aid granted by the Friuli-Venezia Giulia Region (Italy) to road haulage companies in the Region (OJ 1998 L 66, p. 18) — the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of: V. Skouris, acting as President of the Sixth Chamber, J. N. Cunha Rodrigues, J.-P. Puissochet, R. Schintgen and F. Macken (Rapporteur), Judges; S. Alber, Advocate General; M.-F. Contet, Prinicple Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 29 April 2004, in which it:

----

(1)  OJ C 387, 20.12.1997.

----
Docket: EBSA-2010-0007 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in 

Retirement Plans 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0007-0001 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options 

Document: EBSA-2010-0007-DRAFT-0063 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: Farhana Bandukwala 

Address: 

Carlsbad, CA, 

General Comment 

401K and IRA accounts contain private resources of individuals that have earned this money by lifetime 

of work. These accounts are private property allowing the owner to remove contributions as he or she 

sees fit under the established withdrawal rules. The contributions to these accounts have been made 

under a set of rules by which the participant has been informed at the onset. This is a contract that the 

employee who has chosen to participate in a retirement account has willfully entered. The employee has 

chosen to participate after carefully understanding the repercussions of the rules of withdrawal. By 

changing the withdrawal rules of existing accounts, this contract is violated. The only way a contract's 

rules can be modified is by explicit consent of all parties involved. This would mean that each 401K, IRA 

and such retirement account holder should have the right to refuse the withdrawal rule changes as they 

apply to his individual retirement account. Otherwise, this is a violation of the rights of each retirement 

account holder. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: April 07, 2010 

Received: April 04, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80acfdcc 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=Print&PrintId=0900006480acfdc... 4/7/2010
From: Vbgraphix .com [mailto:vbgraphix2003@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 7:50 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Regarding RIN 1210-AB33

I just want to say that I hope everything possible is done to ensure retirement 

security for all Americans. 

Make annuitization the default option! 

Don't listen to paranoid idiots who think a sensibly regulated pension system is 

"socialism." Create a sustainable system that provides for everyone as best as 

possible! 

Though, my only word of caution is that we must anticipate the dramatically 

increased lifespans and healthspans of humans in the 21st century. Developments in 

biotech will help people stay youthful well into their 70s and 80s in the very near 

future. Companies are going to go broke en masse paying pensions to hordes 

perfectly healthy people for decades on end. Of course newer more agile businesses 

with a higher capital to labor ratio will replace the old ones, and the retired people 

wont be so retired any more, but we must manage that transition. 

Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now.
From: Eric.Petersen@aksteel.com [mailto:Eric.Petersen@aksteel.com]

Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 4:33 PM

To: richardparkerdc@gmail.com

Cc: Aaron.Meyers@cooperindustries.com; adelaski@stan dardsasap.org; ahofmann@publicpower.org; Aris Marantan; artrosenfeld@gmail.com; august.esch@ gmail.com; BermanEconomics@gmail.com; Brian Coffey; bruce.r.hirsch@bge.com; bsmith@federalpa cific.com; cabolduc@lbl.gov; Caitlin Johnson; carlos.gaytan@ge.com; carlosgsiqueiros@eaton.c om; chad.kennedy@us.schneider-electric.com; charlied@uss.org; chuck.simmons@pgnmail.com; Cla_Silcox@nema.org; cstephens@neea.org; Daniel.Cohen@hq.doe.gov; dave.millure@met glas.com; DYoung@energy-solution.com; eduardorobles@eaton.com; Eric.Petersen@akst eel.com; gbf1@pge.com; gjrosenquist@lbl.gov; greg.coulter405@gmail.com; James.Lass@c leco.com; Jennifer.Tiedeman@hq.doe.com; Jeremiah.Freeman@ee.doe.gov; jerry.corkran@coo perindustries.com; jerry.schoen@aksteel.com; jhodge@howard-ind.com; Jim.cree vy@nema.org; Jim.Raba@ee.doe.go v; jmauer@standardsasap.org; Joh_Caskey@nema.org; john.cymb alsky@ee.doe.gov; jrossetti@mlgw.org; kcoughlin@lbl.gov; kwinder@mleainc.com; maheshsampat@bellsouth .net; mark.stoering@xcelenergy.com; Matthew Nardotti; mhyland@appanet.org; Michael Rivest; mwaltner@nrdc.org; Paul.Ryan@hitmet.com; phil@pjharter.com; phopkinson@hvol t.com; pkumar@publicpower.org; Raymond.Polinski@atimetals.com; rgreeson@fed eralpacific.com; rick.anderson@faypwc.com; robert.saint@nreca.coop; rro y@nrdc.org; ScottB@lvmetals.com; snadel@aceee.org; srosenstock@eei.org; tballo@earthjustice.org; Te ckman@nwcouncil.org; thomas.patzner@us.schneiderelectric.com; vijay.tendulkar@onyxpower.com; Zhimei Luo; Jerry_W_Schoen@aksteel.com Subject: Projected US Demand for Core Materials

Mr. Parker,

Please find attached a report that addresses our conc erns regarding the DOE's projection of the US

distribution transformer market. Our concern is that the market will be driven by the need for replacement transformers, as our model forecasted 2008-2011 tran sformer replacements comprised 75-80% of total deliveries and that beyond 2015, replacements will comprise over 50% of total deliveries.

As we have stated within committee meetings, transf ormer replacements is a real issue and needs to be considered as it has the potential to substantially diminish life cycle, energy savings, and environmental benefits of higher efficiency standards.

Regards,

Eric Petersen

Director

Customer Technical Services and Research AK Steel Corporation

Confidentiality Notice This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message.
#### Leopold Bossange, Respondent, v. Louis Boisse, Appellant.

Order reversed and motion denied, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by Dykman, j.
z AQB Home 

z Public Notices 

z Site Map 

z Contact Us 

z FAQs 

 

 

Air Quality Bureau 

Contact the New Mexico Air Quality Bureau

The Air Quality Bureau of the New Mexico Environment Department has its main offices located in 

Santa Fe: 

New Mexico Environment Department 

Air Quality Bureau 

1301 Siler Road 

Building B 

Santa Fe, New Mexico 87507

The Bureau's Santa Fe phone number is (505) 476-4300 or call the Air Quality Bureau Hotline. The fax 

number for the Bureau is (505) 476-4375. 

In addition to the Santa Fe Office, the Bureau has staff at Environment Department Field Offices in 

Carlsbad, Farmington, Grants, Las Cruces, Roswell and Silver City. 

To contact individual Air Quality Bureau staff regarding specific issues, go to the Air Quality Contacts 

Page. 

page last updated 07/13/2010 

© 2008 New Mexico Environment Department. All Rights Reserved. 

NMED Homepage

 Search AQB Quick Links...

New Mexico Air Quality Bureau - Contact Us Page 1 of 1

file://H:\6PD\6PD-L\NM SIP-FIP Docket\Echo of NMED web site as of 12-21-10\contact.h... 1/6/2011