alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Decreasing Violence Using


Cultural Traditions


Closing the Gap, Men’s Health • September/October 2001 

S

inte Gleska University Family Life Center is located on the Rosebud Indian 

Reservation in Mission, South Dakota. In existence for nearly two years, the 

Center helps students effectively deal with and manage anger. The curriculum—Violence Behavioral Cycle—teaches students that violence is continuous cycle. 

“Native American youth—particularly the young men—often fall victim to the 

cycle of violence. They hold in anger until it builds, and then they unleash it on 

someone else. We use this program to help them work out their anger—before someone gets hurt,” said Kevin DeCora, prevention specialist. 

“One of our conflict resolution techniques is meditation that draws on our Native 

American heritage—something our people have been doing for centuries. We sit the 

kids in a circle, we have an eagle feather, we light sage for purification, and then we 

meditate on the problem. This connects them to their culture, provides spiritual significance, and provides them with a solution to their problem,” DeCora added. 

Anger begets violence, and therefore, violence prevention is also a strong component of the Center’s program. Violence has increased tremendously on the Rosebud 

Indian Reservation—and is often more personal in nature. Often kids present with 

identity issues that lead to anger and violence. The Center’s first priority is to help the 

kids realize the importance of, and to understand and be proud of their heritage as 

Lakota Indians, thereby taking pride in one another. This tactic helps to decrease the 

incidence of violence in the community. 

“It’s not like drive-bys in big cities where you never see your victim die because 

you’re in a car or across the street. Here we have people beating each other to death. 

There are a lot of incidents of beatings with bats, jacks, and bars by youth on each 

other. We usually see the violence in the 13 to 25 age groups, with men usually the 

culprits. However, we’ve also seen a lot of women becoming more violent,” said 

DeCora. 

To date, Sinte Gleska University Family Life Center has made significant progress 

in reducing the incidence of violence on the reservation. According to DeCora, “We’ve 

had a lot of success stories, and we’re seeing a lot of our kids applying the anger 

management techniques they learn here, in the community.” 

For more information, go to http://www.fcvp.org/flcs/sinte_gleska.htm.

Office of Minority Health Resource Center U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
From: Helene Gilbert [mailto:interpchess@sbcglobal.net] 

Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 12:22 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Comments on government annuities

To Whom It May Concern, 

I saw a newspaper article and several newsletter articles about 

government annuities as an option for my retirement monies. I believe 

my comments will fall on deaf ears, yet I am compelled to speak my 

mind. I am still under the illusion that we abide by the Constitution of 

the US. 

 

America is about freedom of choice. If this taxpayer has a choice I would 

like to have a choice when I go to put money in my IRA. I want the 

choice to decide on an IRA, leave my 401K where it is with my employer 

or transfer it to a new employer. If this annuity is "conditional" and 

financially penalizes me for choosing another option, like an IRA, then 

you've taken away my right to choose. 

Taxes, incentives, and laws based on the whims of politicos, the national 

debt or "flavor of the day" politics does not protect my right to choose 

how to allocate my retirement monies, how to prepare for my aging, 

healthcare and life as a retiree in general. If this taxpayers opinion 

counts at all, create OPTIONS and don't make them contingent on a 

financial incentive or penalty for choosing YOUR option or the option 

that gives the government access to my monies just because our 

government is in debt and can't manage their finances! 

Respectfully, 

Helene Gilbert
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 45327

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

BRYON NATHAN HAWLEY ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Filed: July 12, 2018

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho, Canyon County. Hon. Christopher S. Nye , District Judge.

Order denying Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion for reduction of
sentence, affirmed

.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Andrea W. Reynolds

, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; HUSKEY, Judge; and LORELLO, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Bryon Nathan Hawley pled guilty to felony injury to children , Idaho Code § 18

- 1501(1)

. The district court imposed a unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period of

confinement of five years, to run con secutively with Hawley’s sentence in a separate case. The

district court retained jurisdiction and

, at the conclusion of the rider, placed Hawley on

probation

. Subsequently, Hawley was found to have violated the terms of the probation, and the

district court consequently revoked probation and ordered execution of the original sentence

. Having been granted relief in post

- conviction proceedings, Hawley filed an Idaho Criminal

Rule 35 motion for reduction of sentence, which the district court denied. Hawley appeals.2 A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency,

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton , 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d

23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee , 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In

presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of

new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the

motion. State v. Huffman , 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). Upon review of the

record, including any new information submitted with Hawley ’s Rule 35 motion, we conclude no

abuse of discretion has been shown. Therefore, the d istrict court’s order denying Hawley ’s

Rule 35 motion is affirmed.
#### § 586.2 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to implement 49 U.S.C. 30114(b) to exempt not more than 325 replica motor vehicles per year that are manufactured or imported by low-volume manufacturers from certain requirements for motor vehicles. This part specifies eligibility requirements for low-volume manufacturers to qualify for the exemption. They must register with NHTSA as a replica motor vehicle manufacturer according to procedures for the registration of such manufacturers, meet content and format requirements for registration submissions, and meet requirements for updating registrations. This part also provides for the revocation of registrations and sets forth labeling, reporting, and other requirements. Manufacturers are not exempted under 49 U.S.C. 30114(b) unless they register with NHTSA pursuant to this part 586.
#### § 630.2 Scope.

This part applies to all applicants for, and any person that receives benefits directly from, a grant under 49 U.S.C. 5307 or 5311.
EXHIBIT 10.3

                            COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS


Compensatory Arrangement with the Board of Directors
-----------------------------------------------------

Effective May 27, 2004, non-employee board members receive an annual retainer of
$16,000  paid in  quarterly  increments.  Audit  committee  members  receive  an
additional  $6,500 and the Chairman of the Audit  Committee  receives  $9,000 in
addition to his audit committee compensation.  Each director receives a grant of
10,000  CompuDyne  (CDCY)  non-qualified  stock  options upon his or her initial
election  as a director,  5,000 of which vest after two years and the  remaining
5,000  vest  after  three  years.  An annual  grant of 10,000  CompuDyne  (CDCY)
non-qualified stock options is granted to each Director thereafter; 5,000 of the
options vest after two years and the remaining 5,000 vest after three years. The
grant price of the options is equal to the fair market value of the common stock
on the date of grant.

Compensatory Arrangements with Certain Named Executive Officers
----------------------------------------------------------------

The following named executive officers of the Registrant (as of the Registrant's
2004 Proxy Statement) do not have employment agreements with the Registrant and,
accordingly,  their  employment  with  the  Registrant  is "at  will."  For  the
Registrant's  2005 fiscal  year,  the current  annual base salary for each named
executive below is the following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

<S>                                                                                          <C>
           Name and Title                                                             Fiscal 2005 Salary
           --------------                                                             ------------------

           Martin A. Roenigk, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer                $   275,000

           Geoffrey F. Feidelberg, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer                     $   275,000

           Maurice Boukelif, Chief Operating Officer                                         $   230,000

           Philip M. Blackmon, President of Quanta Systems, Inc.                             $   140,000

           William C. Rock, V.P. Accounting, Corporate Controller and Secretary              $   143,000

           Gary Mangus, President of Institutional Security Systems                          $   180,000

           Bradley Wiggins, President of Attack Protection                                   $   200,000
</TABLE>

The annual base salaries are subject to adjustment  pursuant to the Registrant's
employee  compensation  policies  in effect  from time to time.  Each  executive
officer is eligible to receive a bonus and other employee  benefits  pursuant to
the Registrant's employee benefit plans.
Editorial Note on Part 385
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 385.337 What happens if a new entrant refuses to permit a safety audit to be performed on its operations? ( a ) If a new entrant refuses to permit a safety audit to be performed on its operations, FMCSA will provide the carrier with written notice that its registration will be revoked and its operations placed out of service unless the new entrant agrees in writing, within 10 days from the service date of the notice, to permit the safety audit to be performed. The refusal to permit a safety audit to be performed may subject the new entrant to the penalty provisions of 49 U.S.C. 521(b)(2)(A), as adjusted for inflation by 49 CFR part 386, appendix B.
( b ) If the new entrant does not agree to undergo a safety audit as specified in paragraph (a) of this section, its registration will be revoked and its interstate operations placed out of service effective on the 11th day from the service date of the notice issued under paragraph (a) of this section.
[67 FR 31983, May 13, 2002, as amended at 73 FR 76491, Dec. 16, 2008]
§ 174.615 Cleaning cars. ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) After Division 6.1 (poisonous) materials are unloaded from a rail car, that car must be thoroughly cleaned unless the car is used exclusively in the carriage of Division 6.1 (poisonous) materials.
[Amdt. 174-26, 41 FR 16092, Apr. 15, 1976, as amended by Amdt. 174-68, 55 FR 52684, Dec. 21, 1990; Amdt. 174-82, 61 FR 18933, Apr. 29, 1996]
#### Frederick A. Meyer, Respondent, *v.*B. A. & G. N. Williams, Appellant.

*Meyer*v. Williams, 134 App. Div. 963, affirmed.

(Argued March 27, 1911;

decided April 25, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 9,1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of the defendant.

*John Vernon Bonvier, Jr., Dudley Davis*and *Frank V. Johnson*for appellant.

■ *Charles Sleekier, Alfred Steckler*and *Levin L. Brown*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Chase and Collin, JJ.
# Aug. 30: U.S. Military Conducts Airstrikes Against ISIL near Mosul Dam

/ Published Aug. 30, 2014

	August 30, 2014

	Release #20140834	FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla., Aug. 30, 2014 -** U.S. military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in support of Iraqi security force operations, using fighter and remotely-piloted aircraft to conduct five airstrikes in the vicinity of the Mosul Dam.

	The strikes destroyed an ISIL armed vehicle, an ISIL fighting position, ISIL weapons, and significantly damaged an ISIL building.  All aircraft exited the strike areas safely.

	The strikes were conducted under the authority to support Iraqi security force and Kurdish defense force operations, as well as to protect critical infrastructure, U.S. personnel and facilities, and support humanitarian efforts.

	U.S. Central Command has conducted a total of 115 airstrikes across Iraq.
From: Black [mailto:Black1313@cebridge.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 8:32 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Department of Labor RIN 1210-AB33

No, the US Government should not, in any way shape or from, attempt to 

manage, take over or require; 

 personal or corporate retirement accounts, retirement plans, 401K’s or IRAs to 

be managed by the Federal Government.

In the 234 year history of the Federal Government, the government has 

exhibited, without question, the inability to manage money. 

The USPS, AMTRAK, the Federal Budget, etc is only a few examples of fiscal 

mismanagement. 

The American citizen’s retirement accounts are exactly what it implies: Personal 

retirement accounts, not Government slush funds. 

Irvin Vaughn 

New Iberia, La.
#### In the Matter of the Application of the New York, West Shore and Buffalo Railway Company, to Acquire Land of Pennock.

Order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Boardman, J.
In The Matter Of: 

### SERVED: September21, 2016 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

Docket No. FAA-2016-4264 BEM SYSTEMS, INC. ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2015NM730029 Respondent


### ORDERFINALIZING LITIGATION SCHEDULE On August 18, 2016, the undersignedjudge held a prehearing conference in the above captioned case. During the course ofthe conference, the parties developed ajoint litigation schedule with a timeline dependent uponthe hearing date. On August 22, 2016, the undersignedjudge issued a Prehearing Conference Report, ordering the parties to adhere to thejoint litigation schedule. On September 19,2016, the undersignedjudge issued a Notice ofHearing, setting the hearing in this case to begin on February 28, 2017. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §§ 13.205(a)(6) and 13.217(d), 

### IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Complete witness and evidence lists shall be exchanged by the parties and submitted to the undersignedjudge by 

### January 27,2017. 2. Any subpoenarequests shall be submitted to the undersignedjudgeby 

### January 27,2017. 3. Each party shall provide the undersignedjudge a CD containing digital copies ofpremarked versions ofall proposed exhibits by

### January 27,2017. 4. The parties may, during the course ofthe hearing, request the opportunity to submit posthearing briefs pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.231(c).

Administrative LawJudge
Attachment: Service ListSERVICE LIST

- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001

BEM Systems, Inc., Respondent ATTN: Mark Murset, CFO 100 Passaic Avenue Chatham, NJ 07928 Glenn H. Brown, Complainant's Counsel Enforcement Division, Western Team Federal Aviation Administration 222 West 7th Avenue Box 14 Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 TEL: 907-271-5271 FAX: 907-271-2800 ONE COPY

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 Docket No. FAA-2016-4264 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
## MEMORANDUM

**DATE:** 11/21 /14 **FROM:** Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR– 2013 - 0602 **SUBJECT:** Discussion of the Clean Power Plan with EPA Region 4 State and Local Energy and

Environmental Agencies **SUMMARY :**  

### EPA Region 4 provided information on the Clean Power Plan to EPA Region 4 State, Local, and Tribal Energy and Environmental Agencies on 8/1 9 /14 

### . The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was p roposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES :**  **EPA** Ken Mitchell/EPA R4 Keith Goff

/EPA R4 Reid Harvey/OAR OAP Other EPA OAR HQ staff **External Stakeholders** Approximately 2 8 State and Local Energy and Environmental Agency staff
# Helicopter Raid in Northern Syria Targets ISIS Official 

/ Published Sept. 25, 2023

Sept. 25, 2023 

Release Number 20230925-01 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 

**TAMPA, Fla.**– U.S. Central Command forces successfully conducted a helicopter raid in northern Syria, Sept. 23, 2023. Abu Halil al-Fad’ani, an ISIS Syria Operational and Facilitation official, was captured during the raid. Al-Fad’ani was assessed to have relationships throughout the ISIS network in the region. 

“The capture of ISIS officials like al-Fad’ani increases our ability to locate, target, and remove terrorist from the battlefield,” said Lt. Col. Troy Garlock, CENTCOM spokesperson. “USCENTCOM remains committed to the enduring defeat of ISIS.” 

No civilians were killed or injured during this operation. 

-30-
-.. ' ,, <E~4t{)Lp-O( 

1

1 RECEIVED • 

'D\E' \~""'N.~ \s~, ~~\J'.L_r:_'-l-E -COURToFcR'Iil IN ----+.,-=-~Y X!\ - __ Jb ..!::!\s._.)_,__..,.._ ______ --'--'"'-'-'--LlWINA:t-A·ppEALS 

----+' -~ . - J 'N-0-9-20l.f-l¥15------ 1___... 

;i-\\-\c. S\&:1:£ C$: .TE....._>5.~f\:..!.<:,=-----~---~ -.~-----

' -- 4"6el Acosta, Clerk 

' 

----+1-!..k~£ ~ C. - ~ 1 l - 009'1 &~ ~ \\ ':85..3.£.2-' A ___ ___.. __ ~-~-- :1 -----.:r----lJf\1£ ~\<~S\ ~\\_~~ ._. '8{\~IL.~\3.~--~-............... ---......_.._._--

.:, 

I 

' 

I .-.. . 

_ .I. _ = = =t:Rr~~E'\~.c; t-.. _ ·m- _ • __ = __ -= _ -·= --- "I 

I 

1 ""\"" ~n C\. ""-..\ ~-"h · --- ·--:- 6 r· • ·.~ 'T 11""'\"l::> ·~ - ~ ·:-c-~- .,...-.\ · l\' n ....... . ;--;.-- - 1

1 __ .X.!S..!.~...;l~\~~\ _ \\\\:J ~t:)~"""- __ ~~UC" __ c _ ~.\~ USkl\s_\~ 

_ !' -r~ ... ·-c-~_e\\':.S~~N1\T _ ,\\\\\\_\E\)\~\t:.t\\_~ .I,-\~ ~~\T --~~M.~~\);_~~~---......,1 --~........_.,.!_&;.,"B~'tt .''TtJ \\\~. ~~- Of L~.\~'\\N\\-\._ -&~-tE.\\\_~. (......:;-~_,_N'""'"-~=----­

J l2:R~e IS. "T\:.~\7: R£l \E::E .. €~Y\f\Lhl,)_ · \!:) ··fu~ f\-~tt.\c.A-tSt. ----+--'\ . 

:1. r-vos~ ~"" .-:;s·L.L. · -----+----------~\-~~'~t =t-Et-{;trt-.-.---------:---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6655

LOUIS CARL JEMISON, III,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

U.S. MARSHALS; ALBERTO GONZALES; PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District

Judge. (3:07-cv-00403-HEH)

Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 25, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louis Carol Jemison, III, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland

Hambrick, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Louis Carl Jemison, III, appeals the district court order

dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000)

petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court

memorandum order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district

court. See Jemison v. U.S. Marshals, No. 3:07-cv-00403-HEH (E.D.

Va. Feb. 20, 2008). We deny Jemison’s motion for oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report of Brigham Exploration Company
(the"Company")  on  Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ben M.Brigham,  President,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chairman of the Board
of the Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:


     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: May 13, 2004                       /s/ Bud M. Brigham
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Bud M. Brigham
                                          Chief Executive Officer, President and
                                          Chairman of the Board



     This certification shall not be deemed to be "filed" for the purpose of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be
incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as
being incorporated therein by reference.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Brigham
Exploration Company and will be retained by Brigham Exploration Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
#### Ralph L. Anderton, Appellant, v. New York Concert Company, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars cost-5 and disbursements Opinion by

Davis, P. J.,

Brady, J., concurring in result.