alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1496.html[7/23/2015 12:11:09 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvo-g5e8

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1496

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: PETER Schoepke

General Comment

Stay out of MY savings. I can plan my own retirement thank you!
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6792

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KENNETH ORLANDO LEGRAND,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (CR-90-302-G, CA-97-396)

Submitted: August 23, 2001 Decided: August 30, 2001

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Orlando Legrand, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Orlando Legrand seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Legrand, Nos. CR-90-302-G; CA-97-396

(M.D.N.C. Feb. 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
From: William Kuhle [mailto:wkuhle@comcast.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 11:53 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

To Whom It May Concern, 

I oppose changing the rules for employer-sponsored retirement plans or individual retirement arrangements 

(IRAs) to require that existing money in these plans or new money added to these funds be directed, by 

mandate, into some form of annuity. I don't trust the federal government to not inflate away the value of the 

annnuity. 

Keep your hands off our hard earned money which has taken many of us a lifetime of hard work and thrift to 

accumulate. 

You did not work for this money. You did not sacrifice to save it and it is not yours. 

Teresa Ghilarducci can go soak her head. 

Regards, 

William Kuhle 

1709 NW 40th Avenue, 

Camas, WA
# Carter, Saudi deputy crown prince reaffirm security partnership

/ Published April 20, 2016

**WASHINGTON (April 19, 2016)  —** Defense Secretary Ash Carter met today with Saudi Arabia's defense minister, Deputy Crown Prince ‎Mohammed bin Salman in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, where the two leaders affirmed the longtime security partnership between the U.S. and Saudi Arabia, according to a statement by Pentagon Press Secretary Peter Cook issued Tuesday.

The two leaders discussed a range of issues related to mutual security interests, including checking Iranian destabilizing activities in the region and countering violent extremism from groups like ISIL, Cook said.

Building on commitments made at Camp David last May, and in advance of the Gulf Cooperation Council Summit to be hosted by President Barack Obama in Riyadh, Carter identified several areas where the United States and Saudi Arabia can deepen their security cooperation for the benefit of both countries, such as enhancing training for special operations and counterterrorism forces, integrating air and missile defense systems, bolstering cyber defenses, and strengthening maritime security, Cook said.

The secretary and Deputy Crown Prince agreed to continue these constructive discussions at the U.S.-GCC Defense Ministerial, which they will co-host tomorrow in advance of the U.S.-GCC Summit the following day, Cook said.
----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906**

**OF      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                  August 8, 2006 | By:    | /s/Jeffry                  E. Sterba     |
|---------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|                                  |   | Jeffry                  E. Sterba        |
|                                  |   | Chairman,                  President and |
|                                  |   | Chief                  Executive Officer |
June 10, 2015 

Mr. Chad Hicks 

Navigation Electronics, Inc. 

200 Toledo Drive 

Lafeyette, LA 70506 

Dear Mr. Hicks: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your May 18, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

1741), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2012

- NM

- 129

- AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate t o include specific

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
H. Res. 141

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 17, 2001.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 622) to amend the

Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the adoption credit,

and for other purposes. The bill shall be considered as read

for amendment. The amendment recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill shall be

considered as adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage

without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on

the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled by the

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on

Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with or

without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
# CENTCOM’s Command Surgeon hosts 2023 MSCE

/ Published May 8, 2023
TAMPA, Fla., 
U. S. Central Command (CENTCOM) hosted a Medical Security Cooperation Exchange (MSCE) 30 April - 4 May, 2023. The event brought together healthcare leaders from the U. S. and its regional partners over five days to share best practices and strengthen relationships. This event’s theme was “Partnership and Innovation to Enhance Military Medicine.”The bi-annual MSCE provides an opportunity for medical professionals to discuss current challenges, to share experiences and practices to provide care, and to identify opportunities to partner to address current health challenges. People, partners, and innovation make up CENTCOM’s Strategic Approach. Each element was prominent within the context of the MSCE."The MSCE is a testament to our commitment to working with our partners to build strong, lasting relationships that enhance our collective medical capabilities," said Colonel Larry McCord, CENTCOM’s Command Surgeon. "Through events like these, we can share knowledge and expertise, improve our medical practices, and enhance our ability to work together in the face of any medical challenge."Of particular focus was the identification of opportunities to partner and innovate to address common health challenges. This was pursued through presentations from senior health leaders and supporting organizations, through tours of local facilities to highlight current education and practice methodologies, and informal discussion throughout.Attendees toured the University of South Florida’s Center for Advanced Medical Learning and Simulation (CAMLS) and the James H. Haley VA Hospital. CAMLS is one of the world’s largest medical simulation facilities exclusively dedicated to training healthcare professionals.“CENTCOM and the partner nations provided beneficial lectures and tours during the conference,” said Brig. Gen. Dr. Mohamed Al-Khawalde, of the Jordanian Armed Forces. “We all benefited from many of the topics raised, in addition to providing much of our own expertise in military medicine and healing injuries during wartime.”The MSCE underscores CENTCOM's ongoing efforts to improve medical capabilities and foster relationships with partner nations. By working together to improve medical capabilities, CENTCOM continues to build strong and effective partnerships with countries in the region.“Such medical conferences are essential to our region’s partnership efforts as they explore collaboration possibilities with the attending countries and come together with a global health plan,” said Maj. Gen Dr. Yasser Hussain Mandourah, of the Royal Saudi Armed Forces.
1210-AB32-2-1224.html[7/24/2015 8:47:41 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvs-3zqt

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1719

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Belinda Sturz

Address:

8825 Jefferson Dr

Buena Park, CA, 90620

Email: balsturz@mail.com

General Comment

I was smart enough to put MY money into a 401K and i'm smart enough to control my own MONEY. The

 government can't control their own spending and taxing the people i don't want them in my business. If the

 government gets into the peoples business on their investing than people will quite investing their money to keep

 the government out of their business there will be more fall out to businesses and people if this is to pass.
Exhibit 32.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Hampton's Luxury Homes, Inc..
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Frank Dalene, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
         of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Frank Dalene
Frank Dalene
Chief Financial Officer
June 9, 2005
American adviser mentors Afghans on rule of law
 By By Sean Dath, Resolute Support Public Affairs
  ******NANGARHAR PROVINCE, Afghanistan, May 28, 2015 -** The train, advise and assist mission under NATO's Resolute Support focuses on eight key  areas called "essential functions" that are crucial to the continued development of Afghan security forces. Rule of law and governance is one of the essential functions and promotes civilian governance of the security forces in an effort to maintain an effective and transparent criminal and disciplinary system. U.S. Army Capt. Michael Levin, rule of law adviser for the police advisory team at Operational Base Fenty, conducts key leader engagements, or KLEs, with Afghan police detectives, prosecutors and judges in eastern Afghanistan to provide guidance on how to work within the rules of their system. "During our KLEs we will teach them specific techniques like showing the police how to properly handle evidence," said Levin.  "Our main goal is to get our counterparts to operate within the confines of their laws." According to Levin, having their Afghan colleagues demonstrate their knowledge of the law will go a long way toward strengthening the rule of law and building a sense of trust in the system with the citizens of Afghanistan. "One of the areas we work on is building competency and then taking that competency and putting it out there in accordance with their laws," Levin said.  "When the Afghan people see that the law is being adhered to, it gives them confidence in the justice system." Since his arrival in Afghanistan in January, Levin said he and his team have observed some improvements with their counterparts' ability to follow the rule of law.  One important success has been the Afghan law enforcement officials' ability to use search warrants in accordance with the new Afghan Criminal Procedure Code, which was issued in 2014. "We've worked with the agents as well as the prosecutors to emphasize the importance of using these warrants as their Criminal Procedure Code mandates," said Levin.  "So as long as they are enforcing their laws and adhering to their rules, that is a big accomplishment." The eight essential functions "provide the framework and guidelines that will enable Afghanistan and its security forces to sustain their efforts and guide Afghanistan into a brighter future," according to a Resolute Support fact sheet. In addition to rule of law, the other essential functions include: - Multiyear budgeting and execution of programs - Transparency, accountability and oversight (prevent corruption) - Force generation (recruit, train and equip the force) - Sustainment (supply and maintenance) - Strategy and policy planning, resourcing and execution (plan and resource campaigns) - Intelligence - Strategic communication. The NATO mission in Afghanistan draws about 13,000 troops from about 40 contributing nations.
# October 31: Military airstrikes continue against ISIS terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published Oct. 31, 2017
October 31, 2017Release # 20171031-01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASESOUTHWEST ASIA – On Oct. 30, 2017, Coalition military forces conducted eight strikes consisting of 14 engagements against ISIS terrorists in Syria and Iraq.On Oct. 30 in Syria, Coalition military forces conducted four strikes consisting of four engagements against ISIS targets.•       Near Abu Kamal, two strikes engaged two ISIS tactical units, destroying a vehicle and an ISIS headquarters.•       Near Dayr Az Zawr, two strikes engaged two ISIS tactical units.On Oct. 30 in Iraq, Coalition military forces conducted four strikes consisting of 10 engagements against ISIS targets.•       Near Al Qaim, four strikes engaged two ISIS tactical units and destroyed an ISIS vehicle, a staging site, a mortar firing position, and damaged 13 ISIS supply routes.Additionally, two strikes consisting of four engagements were conducted in Syria on Oct. 29.•       Near Abu Kamal, one strike engaged an ISIS tactical unit and damaged an ISIS headquarters.•       Near Dayr Az Zawr, one strike engaged an ISIS tactical unit.These strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to destroy ISIS in Iraq and Syria.  The destruction of ISIS targets in Iraq and Syria also further limits the group’s ability to project terror and conduct external operations throughout the region and the rest of the world.This Coalition strike release contains all strikes conducted by fighter, attack, bomber, rotary-wing, or remotely piloted aircraft, rocket propelled artillery and ground-based tactical artillery.A strike, as defined in the Coalition release, refers to one or more kinetic engagements that occur in roughly the same geographic location to produce a single, sometimes cumulative effect in that location.For example, a single aircraft delivering a single  weapon against a lone ISIS vehicle is one strike, but so is multiple aircraft delivering dozens of weapons against a group of ISIS-held buildings and weapon systems in a compound, having the cumulative effect of making that facility harder or impossible to use. Strike assessments are based on initial reports and may be refined.CJTF-OIR does not report the number or type of aircraft employed in a strike, the number of munitions dropped in each strike, or the number of individual munition impact points against a target. The information used to compile the daily strike releases is based on 'Z' or Greenwich Mean Time.-30-
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           UT
               
             
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      1,069,182
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    54,669
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         257,401
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       611,667
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,992,919
<COMMON>                                       162,214
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      276,287
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            51,504
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 490,005
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          67,528
<PREFERRED>                                    65,571
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           587,594
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  35,730
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      7,000
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    34,657
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               1,725
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 703,109
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  1,992,919
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      916,016
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           13,328
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     824,046
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     837,374
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        85,859
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             5,129
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 90,988
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       53,008
<NET-INCOME>                                   37,980
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    10,178
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  27,802
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       29,222
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      30,761
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         135,528
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .86

        


</TABLE>
----

(2004/C 84 E/0071)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3524/03

by Giacomo Santini (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(28 November 2003)

Subject:   Eco-point scheme in Austria

As regards the issue of HGV transit in Austria and the Eco-point scheme, and now that the most recent attempt to reconcile Austria's claims with those of other EU countries has resulted in utter failure, further consideration of the matter has been held over until 25 November, on which date a fresh attempt to reach an agreement will be made.

It seems that the fault now lies with France and Germany, which appear to have done a volte-face and are now in favour of extending the Eco-point scheme beyond the 31 December 2003 cut-off point. Within the Conciliation Committee the Italian Government (in the person of an under-secretary, Paolo Uggè) has pointed out that both the Commission and the European Parliament are in favour of abandoning the Eco-point scheme.

Italy wished to reach an agreement with Austria whereby, for a further year, 20 % of the Eco-points would be retained for vehicles in categories EUR 1 and EUR 2, whilst category EUR 3 would be left open. France and Germany rejected the agreement, since their HGV fleets are older, higher-mileage ones which include a significant proportion of highly polluting vehicles.

Answer given by Ms de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(26 January 2004)

In December 2001 the Commission presented a proposal to extend the ecopoints system for the transit of heavy goods vehicles through Austria. Since then, it has made sustained efforts to help the parties concerned come to an agreement. Such an agreement was reached during the meeting of the Conciliation Committee on 25 November 2003. The Honourable Member will be aware that fourteen Member States and the delegation from Parliament came out in favour of the option put forward by the Commission. The Regulation was finally adopted on 22 December 2003 (1).

----

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 2327/2003, OJ L 345, 31.12.2003.

----