alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000741612
<NAME> TNP ENTERPRISES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      933,939
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      3,927
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          38,123
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        30,795
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,006,784
<COMMON>                                       183,771
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             94,703
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 278,474
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,420
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           533,964
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      138
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 190,788
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,006,784
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      502,737
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            10,333
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     398,527
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     408,860
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         93,877
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             (1,461)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  92,416
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        69,363
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,053
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        167
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   22,886
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        10,700
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       64,654
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          65,201
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.98
        

</TABLE>
-----Original Message-----

From: cabezas [mailto:cabezas@maine.rr.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 4:17 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Please add my voice to those you've heard from supporting the proposal that investment advisors be 

required to put their clients' 

interests first. I am just starting retirement and will be living on very little. I absolutely need to get the 

best investment advice possible for myself and my family.

Thank you,

Martha Van Wyck

19 Belknap Street

Portland ME 04103
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn expert system to perform on-line controller tuningAn expert system which tunes a Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controller on-line for a single-input-single-output multiple-lag process with dead time is described. The expert system examines features of the previous transient responses and their corresponding sets of controller parameters. It determines a new set of controller gains to obtain a more desirable time response. This technique can be used to determine and implement a different set of PID gains for each operating regime and, once in steady state, the system can be used to find optimal parameters for load disturbance rejection. The expert system can be applied to any system of the specified form (aerospace, industrial, etc.) and can be expanded to include additional process models.Document ID19900014675Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsLitt, Jonathan S.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryCyberneticsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-103101AVSCOM-TR-90-C-007E-5422AD-A224969NAS 1.15:103101Meeting InformationMeeting: 1990 American Control ConferenceLocation: San Diego, CACountry: United StatesStart Date: May 23, 1990End Date: May 25, 1990Sponsors:American Automatic Control CouncilAccession Number90N23991Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-62-0KPROJECT: DA PROJ. 1L1-62211-A4-7ADistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900014675.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*William H. McNutt, Appellant.

*People*v. McNutt, 133 App. Div. 944, affirmed.

(Argued May 12, 1911;

decided May 30, 1911.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, *572entered July 13, 1909, which affirmed a judgment of the Court of General Sessions of the Peace in the county of New York rendered upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of grand larceny in the first degree.

*Reuben Peckham*and *James W. Osborne*for appellant.

*Charles S. Whitman, District Attorney (Robert S. Johnstone*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
§ 831.40 Authority of NTSB in railroad, pipeline, and hazardous materials investigations. ( a ) *Scope.* ( 1 ) *Railroads.* Consistent with its statutory authority, the NTSB is responsible for the investigation of railroad accidents, collisions, crashes, derailments, explosions, incidents, and releases in which there is a fatality, substantial property damage, or which involve a passenger train, as described in part 840 of this chapter.
( 2 ) *Pipelines.* The NTSB is responsible for the investigation of pipeline accidents, explosions, incidents, and ruptures in which there is a fatality, significant injury to the environment, or substantial property damage. This excludes accidents involving pipelines only carrying water or sewage.
( 3 ) *Hazardous Materials.* The NTSB is responsible for evaluating the adequacy of safeguards and procedures for the transportation of hazardous materials, and the performance of other entities of the Federal government responsible for the safe transportation of hazardous materials. Such evaluations may take place as part of the investigation of a transportation accident subject to the NTSB's authority and include applicable regulations in other subparts of this part.
( b ) *Authority to examine or test.* Pursuant to § 831.9 of this part, during an investigation, a credentialed employee of the NTSB is authorized to examine or test any rolling stock, track, or pipeline component, or any part of any such item (or contents therein) when such examination or testing is determined to be required for purposes of such investigation. Examination or testing will be conducted— ( 1 ) To the extent practicable, so as to not interfere with or obstruct the transportation services provided by the owner or operator of such rolling stock, track, signal, rail shop, property, or pipeline component; and
( 2 ) In a manner that preserves evidence relating to the transportation accident consistent with the needs of the investigation.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsRadiometer offsets and count conversion coefficients for the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) spacecraft for the years 1984, 1985, and 1986A compendium is presented of the ground and inflight scanner and nonscanner offsets and count conversion (gain) coefficients used for the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) production processing of data from the ERBS, NOAA-9, and NOAA-10 satellites for the 1 Nov. 1984 to 31 Dec. 1986.Document ID19910018388Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsPaden, Jack*(ST Systems Corp. Hampton, VA, United States)*Pandey, Dhirendra K.*(ST Systems Corp. Hampton, VA, United States)*Shivakumar, Netra D.*(ST Systems Corp. Hampton, VA, United States)*Stassi, Joseph C.*(ST Systems Corp. Hampton, VA, United States)*Wilson, Robert*(ST Systems Corp. Hampton, VA, United States)*Bolden, William*(ST Systems Corp. Hampton, VA, United States)*Thomas, Susan*(ST Systems Corp. Hampton, VA, United States)*Gibson, M. Alan*(ST Systems Corp. Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1991Subject CategoryMeteorology And ClimatologyReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-187589STX(H)-91/01NAS 1.26:187589Accession Number91N27702Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-18460PROJECT: RTOP 665-45-30-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910018388.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

     I,  Jean  Claude  Mas,  certify  that:

     1.  I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form 10-QSB of Heritage
Worldwide,  Inc.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were  made,  not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

     3.  Based  on  my  knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information  included  in  this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for  the  registrant  and  have:

          a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls and procedures to ensure that
     material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries,  is  made  know  to  us  by  others  within  those  entities,
     particularly  during  the  period  in  which this quarterly report is being
     prepared;

          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
     and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about
     the  effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
     of  the  period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  our  evaluation.

          c)  Disclosed  in  this  quarterly  report  any change in the issuer's
     internal  control  over financial reporting that occurred during the period
     covered  by  this  quarterly  report  that  has  materially affected, or is
     reasonably  likely  to materially affect, the registrant's internal control
     over  financial  reporting;  and

     5.  The  registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on  our  most  recent  evaluation,  to  the  registrant's auditors and the audit
committee  of  registrant's  board  of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the
equivalent  functions):

          a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls  which  are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
     ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

          b)  Any  fraud,  whether  or not material, that involves management or
     other  employees  who  have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls  over  financial  reporting.


     Date:  November  19,  2003                      /s/  Jean  Claude  Mas
                                                     ----------------------
                                                     Principal Executive Officer


                                       14
<PAGE>
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1385.html[7/23/2015 6:35:54 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvm-tlzu

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1385

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Ellen Horton

General Comment

I am capable of the planning and disposition of my own retirement income. I strongly oppose any regulations

 from the 

Department of Labor or any other government agent or agency to limit or direct my personal control of my

 income.
----

Action brought on 13 February 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

(Case C-65/04)

(2004/C 94/43)

An action against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 13 February 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by L. Ström van Lier, acting as agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

Article 5(3) of the Directive, concerning the prior information of the population likely to be affected in the event of a radiological emergency, requires that the relevant information be communicated to this population without any request being made.

The circumstances that gave rise to the Commission's inquires (repair operations of the nuclear submarine ‘Tireless’) highlighted that no prior information had been communicated in the past to the Gibraltar population likely to be affected in the event of a radiological emergency. The mere public availability of the Gibraltar Public Safety Scheme (GIBPUBSAFE) in the public library cannot be considered to meet the requirements of Article 5(3) of the Directive, which requires active communication of such information.

----

(1)  OJ 1989 L 357, p. 31

----
§ 831.22 International aviation investigations. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, *Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation* (Annex 13) contains standards and recommended practices for the notification, investigation, and reporting of certain accidents involving international civil aviation.
( 2 ) Annex 13 provides that the state of occurrence of an accident or incident is responsible for the investigation when the state is a signatory to the Convention.
( b ) The NTSB— ( 1 ) Is the U.S. agency that fulfills the obligations of the United States under Annex 13, in coordination with and consistent with the requirements of the United States Department of State.
( 2 ) Participates in the investigation as the accredited representative to an international investigation when the accident involves a civil aircraft— ( i ) of a U.S. operator;
( ii ) of U.S. registry;
( iii ) of U.S. manufacture; or
( iv ) when the U.S. is the state of design or manufacture of the aircraft or parts thereof.
( c ) *Technical advisers.* Once designated the accredited representative in an international investigation, the NTSB may elect to receive assistance by appointing one or more advisers to serve under the NTSB's direction. Such technical advisers— ( 1 ) Work at the direction and under the supervision of the NTSB accredited representative.
( 2 ) Are subject to the provisions of § 831.13 of this part while working under the supervision of the NTSB accredited representative.
( d ) If an accident occurs in a foreign state that is not a signatory to the Convention, or if an accident or incident involves an aircraft that is not a civil aircraft, the NTSB will participate in the investigation in accordance with any agreement between the United States and the foreign state that addresses such occurrences.
( e ) The NTSB's disclosure of records of a foreign investigation is limited by statute (49 U.S.C 1114(f)) and by § 831.6 of this part.
----

(2004/C 84 E/0187)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0017/04

by Bartho Pronk (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(16 January 2004)

Subject:   Adaptation of Council Directive 92/58/EEC on minimum requirements for the provision of safety and/or health signs at work

Council Directive 92/58 EEC (1) lays down minimum requirements for the provision of safety and/or health signs at work. However, the specifications for signs laid down in the directive are now out of date. Member States have since introduced a range of new signs, as a result of which signs are no longer uniform and standards have deteriorated as a result.

Article 9 of the directive says that the annexes laying down specific specifications for signs should be adapted in the light of technical progress.

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(1 March 2004)

----

(1)OJ L 245, 26.8.1992, p. 23.

(2)OJ L 245, 26.8.1992.

(3)  Council Decision of 27 June 1974, OJ L 185, 9.7.1974, p. 15, repealed by Council Decision of 22 July 2003 setting up an Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work, OJ C 218, 13.9.2003.

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 21

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

      Listed below, as of January 3, 1998, are the subsidiaries of the Company
and their jurisdictions of organization. All of such subsidiaries are either
directly of indirectly wholly-owned by the Company. Certain subsidiaries of the
Company have been omitted because, considered in the aggregate as a single
subsidiary, they would not constitute a significant subsidiary as of the end of
the year covered by this report.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                 Jurisdiction of
   Name of Subsidiary                                                             Organization
   ------------------                                                            ---------------

100% Owned
----------

<S>                                                                              <C>
Orange County Metal Works........................................................California
Cylinder City, Inc...............................................................Minnesota
Commercial Hydraulics Pty., Ltd..................................................Australia
Commercial Intertech do Brasil, Ltda.............................................Brazil
Commercial Intertech, s.r.o......................................................Czech Republic
Commercial Intertech Limited.....................................................England
Astron S.A.R.L...................................................................France
Sachsenhydraulik Chemnitz GmbH...................................................Germany
Commercial Hydraulics S.r.l......................................................Italy
Commercial Intertech S.A.........................................................Luxembourg
Astron Building Systems (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. .....................................People's Republic of China

Other:  (see Note A)
------  ------------

Hydraulik Rochlitz GmbH .........................................................Germany
Commercial Intertech GmbH .......................................................Germany
Ultra Hydraulics Limited.........................................................England


Note A      Commercial Intertech GmbH is 100% owned by Hydraulik Rochlitz
------      GmbH, which is 100% owned by Sachsenhydraulik Chemnitz GmbH.

            Ultra Hydraulics Limited is 100% owned by Commercial Intertech Limited.
</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32**


**Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**


**(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
      Code)**





Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of Xvariant, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"),
      does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A #1 for the fiscal quarter ended March 31,
      2004
      (the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
      contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China Bionanometer Industries Corporation and will be retained by China
      Biononmeter Industries Corporation (formerly Xvariant, Inc.) and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Dated:
      September 5, 2007




/s/
                Wang Wen’gengWang
                Wen’gengPresident
                andChief
                Executive Officer




/s/
                Xiang QinXiang
                QinChief
                Financial Officer