alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

# Foreign Trade

Skip top of page navigation

###### You are here: Census.gov › Business & Industry ›Foreign Trade › U.S. International Trade Data

                - Main
                - About
                - Data
                - Outreach
                - AES
                - Regulations
                - Reference
                - Definitions
                - Schedule B
                - FAQs

### More DATA

                          - Trade Highlights
                          - Balance by Partner Country
                          - Country/Product Trade
                          - State/Metropolitan Data
                          - Historical Series
                          - Notices and Corrections
                          - Related Party Trade
                          - Press Releases
                          - Data Products

### Important Links

                          - Global Reach Blog
                          - Newsletters
                          - ACE AESDirect
                          Related Sites- Business and Industry
- Briefing Room
- North American Industry                Classification System (NAICS)
Economic Indicator Database
                          Textile Concordance - Monthly SubscriptionDownload a file- Click on the appropriate month below to download your file.
-  If you are having technical difficulties or need help, feel free to email us at ftd.data.dissemination@census.gov or call 301-763-2311 for immediate assistance.
- Record	      layouts of the files are  available	      online .
Select Statistical Month:- January 2015 - 62 KB   
- February 2015 - 62 KB  
- March 2015 - 62 KB  
- April 2015 -  62 KB 
- May 2015 - 62 KB 
- June 2015 - 62KB 
- July 2015 - 62 KB 
- August 2015 - 62 KB 
- September 2015 - 62 KB 
- October 2015 - 62 KB 
- November 2015 - 62 KB 
- December 2015 - 62 KB 

                          Export Training
Collection of videos to enhance export training.

Spanish Language Webinars 2020-2021 (Seminarios en Línea en Español 2020-2021)
2017 And Prior Year Webinars Archive.
Upcoming Outreach Activities
Upcoming Outreach Activities
Contact Us
				Contact the International Trade Macro Analysis Branch: Email us! or use our feedback form!

                  Call us: (301)763-2311 or 1-800-549-0595 option 4			  
CONNECT WITH US**********- Information Quality
- Data Linkage Infrastructure
- Data Protection and Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- FOIA
- Inspector General
- No FEAR Act
- U.S. Department of Commerce
- USA.gov

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
✕Is this page helpful?YesNo✕NO THANKS255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached✕Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions?  Source: U.S. Census Bureau | Foreign Trade |  ftdwebmastes@census.gov |     Last Revised:  June 17, 2022
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 12 - 00265 - CR

DARYN WAYNE DARLAND APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- FROM THE 97TH DISTRICT COURT OF MONTAGUE COUNTY

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Appella nt Daryn Wayne Darland attempts to appeal from the trial court’s May 2012 judgment convicting him of possessing less than one gram of a “Penalty Group 1” controlled substance in a drug

- free zone. 2 The judgment reflects that appellant committed the offense in January 2011 and, pursuant to a

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47. 4.

2 See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.115(a), (b) (West 2010) , § 481 .134(d) (West Supp. 2012 ).2

plea bargain, received five years’ confinement as his punishment. In a “Guilty Plea Memorandum” that appellant signed in conjunction with his plea, he received admonishments, waived constitutional and statutory rights , judicially confessed, and waived any right to appeal. The trial judge, appellant, and appellant’s counsel all signed a certification of appellant’s right of appeal that stated that appellant had entered into a plea bargain and had “NO right of appeal.”

N onetheless, in June 2012, appellant filed a notice of appeal. Later in June, w e sent a letter to appellant to inform him that we could dismiss his appeal unless we received a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not received a resp onse. Therefore, in accordance with the trial court’ s certification, we dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d) (“ The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the reco rd under these rules .”), 43.2(f) ; Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006)

.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b )

DELIVERED: August 23, 2012
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****SSI disabled recipients whowork [electronic resource].**
 
SuDoc Number:SSA 1.60/2:
Item Number:0517-B-47 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000587328
 
2003 | 2004 | 2005| 2006
 
February 21, 2020
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Business and Economy    >Wholesale    >Monthly    >Time Series
 Skip to looking for section Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  Monthly Wholesale Trade Historical Data
  Time Series Data (Prior to NAICS)
 The following excel files present the final time series estimates from the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) system (based on the 1987 SIC manual). The two files below include sales estimates from January 1967 - March 2001 and inventories and inventories/sales ratios estimates from December 1980 - March 2001. For comparisons between the SIC and NAICS classification systems, please see the Concordances Table in the list below: January 1967 Through March 2001 (Adjusted)
 January 1967 Through March 2001 (Not Adjusted)
 Concordances Table
  Archived Historical Monthly Wholesale Trade Releases (Prior to NAICS)
 Each zip file below contains all of the monthly releases available for that specific decade. Historic releases for the years 1963, 1967-1970, 1975-1977 are not available in PDF form. Certain years may also be missing months because the data is not available in PDF form. For details on missing months/years, please  email us or call us at 301-763-6856. 2000-2001
 1990-1999
 1980-1989
 1970-1979
 1960-1966
 1950-1959
 1940-1949
 1936-1939
 Last Revised: February 27, 2020


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
§ 8.17 Classification challenges. ( a ) Authorized holders of information classified by the Department of Transportation who, in good faith, believe that its classification status is improper are encouraged and expected to challenge the classification status of the information before the Original Classification Authority (OCA) having jurisdiction over the information. A formal challenge must be in writing, but need not be any more specific than to question why information is or is not classified, or is classified at a certain level.
( b ) Classification challenges to DOT information must be addressed to the DOT Original Classification Authority (OCA) who is responsible for the information. If unsure of the OCA, address the challenge to the DOT Director of Security.
( c ) Classification challenges will be processed according to 32 CFR 2001.14.
[81 FR 45981, July 15, 2016]
SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS



 Exhibit 10.56 
 Summary Compensation for Non-Employee Directors 
 PC Connection, Inc.’s (the “Company’s”)
non-employee directors currently consist of: (i) Bruce Barone; (ii) Joseph Baute; and (iii) Donald Weatherson. In 2005, non-employee directors of the Company received an annual retainer. In addition to this retainer, non-employee
directors were entitled to receive a fee for each regularly scheduled board meeting attended in person and a fee for each committee meeting attended. The table below sets forth the annual retainer, per board meeting fees and per committee meeting
fees paid to our non-employee directors in 2005: 
  

											
	 Director
	  	Annual Retainer(1)	 	 	Fee Per Board
Meeting Attended	  	Fee Per Committee
Meeting Attended(3)
	 Bruce Barone
	  	$	22,000	 	 	$	1,500	  	$	1,500
	 Joseph Baute
	  	$	22,000	 	 	$	1,500	  	$	1,500
	 Donald Weatherson
	  	$	12,833	(2)	 	$	1,500	  	$	1,500

  

	(1)	In addition, the non-employee directors receive reimbursement for all reasonable expenses incurred in attending board and committee meetings. 

  

	(2)	Represents the pro-rata portion of a $22,000 annual retainer commencing on June 9, 2005. 

 The Company did not grant any stock options to non-employee directors in 2005.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KURTAVIUS JERMON SMITH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 206 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 16th day of December, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
EXHIBIT 21

                   SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


[S]                                     [C]             [C]         [C]

                                                                Percentage
                                                                 of voting
                                                                securities
                                      Incorporated                owned by
                                       under the                 immediate
Name                                    laws of        Parent      parent
-----                                 ------------     ------   ----------

CompuDyne Corporation *               Nevada          Registrant     100%
SYSCO Security Systems, Inc.*         Nevada        CompuDyne Corp.  100%
CompuDyne Corp. of Maryland *         Maryland      CompuDyne Corp.  100%
Quanta Systems Corporation *          Connecticut   CompuDyne Corp.  100%
CompuDyne, Inc.**                     Delaware      CompuDyne Corp.  100%
CorrLogic, Inc. *                     Colorado      CompuDyne Corp.  100%
Norment Security Group, Inc. *        Delaware      CompuDyne Corp.  100%
Norshield Corporation  *              Alabama       CompuDyne Corp.  100%
Norment Industries S.A. (Pty) Ltd.    South Africa    Norment        100%
Fiber SenSys, Inc. *                  Oregon        CompuDyne Corp.  100%

                                   ___________________


   Note: *   All subsidiaries of the Registrant as of December 31, 2000,
             are included in the consolidated financial statements of the
             Registrant.
         **  CompuDyne, Inc. filed for petition in bankruptcy on December
             31, 1991.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from  financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2000
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,407
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        216
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,623
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,623
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,607
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           301
<OTHER-SE>                                    (19,285)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,623
<SALES>                                            105
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   105
<CGS>                                               41
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       41
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,591
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,527)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,527)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,527)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 19

- 968

_____________________________
R OGER V ON E VANS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Angela M. Cox , Judge

. September 18, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
M AKAR , O STERHAUS , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Roger Von Evans, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Exhibit 32-4



Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code



The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Report on Form 10-K of Exelon Generation Company, LLC for the year ended
December 31, 2006, that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Exelon Generation Company, LLC.



|                        |  |                                                     
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 13, 2007 |  | /s/    JOHN F.
YOUNG                                
|                        |  | John F. Young                                       
|                        |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



412
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPreliminary development of an intelligent computer assistant for engine monitoringAs part of the F-18 high-angle-of-attack vehicle program, an AI method was developed for the real time monitoring of the propulsion system and for the identification of recovery procedures for the F404 engine. The aim of the development program is to provide enhanced flight safety and to reduce the duties of the propulsion engineers. As telemetry data is received, the results are continually displayed in a number of different color graphical formats. The system makes possible the monitoring of the engine state and the individual parameters. Anomaly information is immediately displayed to the engineer.Document ID19900013006Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsDisbrow, James D.*(PRC Systems Services Co. Edwards, CA., United States)*Duke, Eugene L.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Ray, Ronald J.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1989Subject CategoryCyberneticsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-101702H-1553NAS 1.15:101702Accession Number90N22322Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-66-71Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900013006.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 301 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      December 4, 2001.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, elected to the 
following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure:  Mr. Boozman.
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs: Mr. Boozman.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### § 578.2 Purpose.

One purpose of this part is to effectuate the remedial impact of civil penalties and to foster compliance with the law by specifying the civil penalties for statutory and regulatory violations, as adjusted for inflation. Another purpose of this part is to set forth NHTSA's interpretation of the civil penalty factors listed in 49 U.S.C. 30165(c). A third purpose of this part is to set forth the requirements regarding the reasonable time and the manner of correction for a person seeking safe harbor protection from criminal liability under 49 U.S.C. 30170(a).

[81 FR 10527, Mar. 1, 2016]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 23, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-60194 Conference Calendar

TIMOTHY BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JODY BRADLEY; KATRINA BOLDEN; PAUL HEISTAN, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 5:00-CV-79-S

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Timothy Brown, Mississippi state prisoner # R1098, has appealed the magistrate judge’s judgment dismissing his civil rights complaint with prejudice following a bench trial. Brown has moved for preparation of the trial transcript at Government expense. Brown does not explain in his motion why the transcript is necessary for disposition of an issue on appeal. Accordingly, the motion is denied. See Harvey v. Andrist , 754 F.2d 569, 571 (5th Cir. 1985); see also 28 U.S.C. § 753(f).No. 02-60194 - 2 - We construe Brown’s brief as requesting leave to supplement the record on appeal. “An appellate court may not consider new evidence furnished for the first time on appeal and may not consider facts which were not before the district court at the time of the challenged ruling.” Theriot v. Parish of Jefferson , 185 F.3d 477, 491 n.26 (5th Cir. 1999). The motion is denied. Brown contends that the judgment was contrary to the law and the evidence and that the magistrate judge abused his discretion by failing to order the production of an unredacted prison log. It is the appellant’s responsibility to provide a transcript of all relevant evidence to support his appellate argument. See

F ED . R. A PP . P. 10(b)(2); Powell v. Estelle , 959 F.2d 22, 26 (5th Cir. 1992). As was noted above, Brown’s request for a transcript was inadequate, and his failure to provide a transcript prevents this court from reviewing these issues. See Richardson v. Henry , 902 F.2d 414, 416 (5th Cir. 1990). Because the appeal is without arguable merit, it is dismissed as frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); see also 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. The dismissal of this appeal as frivolous counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). We caution Brown that once he accumulates three strikes, he will not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated orNo. 02-60194 - 3 - detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS DENIED; SANCTION WARNING GIVEN.
1210-AB32-2-1474.html[7/26/2015 5:50:02 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwg-j60z

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1970

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Diana Maier

Address:

6430 Linded Dr.

Indianapolis, IN, 46227

Email: momkitten52@gmail.com

General Comment

My husband and I have worked hard to put aside a little money in an IRA over the years . . . we do not want

 anyone in the extremely inefficient and failing government to touch it in any way, shape or form . . . Keep your

 hands off our retirement savings!!!!! No matter what sort of account we have it in, it's OURS, and the

 government has NO right to tell us how to plan for our "golden" years, or what to do with our money.

 Remember, it's "Of the people, by the people, and for the people . . .", not "Of the government, by the

 government, and for the government" . . . i may have that in the wrong order, but the meaning is the same.