alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

Written Statement of
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
WidePoint Corporation (the Company), hereby certify, based on our knowledge,
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2008
( the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ STEVE L. KOMAR  Steve L.
KomarChief Executive Officer

/s/ JAMES T. MCCUBBIN  James T.
McCubbinChief Financial Officer

Date: August 14, 2008
§ 674.23 Confidentiality of information. ( a ) A State, an SSOA, or an RTA may withhold an investigation report prepared or adopted in accordance with these regulations from being admitted as evidence or used in a civil action for damages resulting from a matter mentioned in the report.
( b ) This part does not require public availability of any data, information, or procedures pertaining to the security of a rail fixed guideway public transportation system or its passenger operations.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00775-CR

NO. 03-13-00776-CR

NO. 03-13-00777-CR

Leon Posada, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 167TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NOS. D-1-DC-12-206773, D-1-DC-13-300536 & D-1-DC-12-206679

HONORABLE P. DAVID WAHLBERG, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Leon Posada, acting pro se, filed notices of appeal from his judgments of conviction

for the offense of theft (trial court cause number D-1-DC-13-300536) and two offenses of credit card

or debit card abuse (trial court cause numbers D-1-DC-12-206773 and D-1-DC-12-206679), all of

which were enhanced by Posada’s prior felony convictions. See Tex. Penal Code §§ 31.03(e)(4)(A),

32.31.

However, the trial court certified that: (1) each of these cases is a plea-bargain case

and Posada has no right of appeal, and (2) Posada waived the right of appeal. Posada and his counsel

signed all three of the trial court’s certifications.
Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

 

Jeff Rose, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Rose, and Goodwin 

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: December 31, 2013

Do Not Publish

2
From: Greiner, Steven [mailto:Steven.Greiner@Schwab.com] 

Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2015 5:19 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Good morning, 

I’m writing concerning the proposed rule to limit equity options usage in IRA’s. The use of options 

whether in an IRA or ordinary brokerage account assist individuals in protecting their assets, in hedging 

and shouldn’t be prohibited. There’s no difference in usage of equity options of puts and calls in ERISA 

plans or other accounts. Options have been around and used safely for over 30 years and had 

absolutely nothing to with the Credit Crisis during 2008-2009. The use of protective puts and covered 

calls aid individuals in safekeeping of their positions in an IRA exactly identical to their use in a standard 

broker account. It would be a large mistake to prohibit their use in and IRA. Please reconsider this 

policy, for it does not making investing safer nor would options ban protect individuals monies in an IRA 

and in fact may make protecting oneself against losses even more difficult.

Best

Steven Greiner

Steven P. Greiner, Ph.D.

SVP | Schwab Equity Ratings Department

 

Tel 312 931-1520 | Cell 585 261-7138 | Fax 312 931-1399

150 S. Wacker Dr, Ste 14; Chicago, IL 60606

Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

NOTICE: All email sent to or from the Charles Schwab corporate email system is subject to archiving, monitoring 

and/or review by Schwab personnel.
From: Larry Anderson [mailto:landerson@radianresearch.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 4:06 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule

As a representative of a company that is 100% employee owned, it is important that I

convey my belief that requiring our independent valuation firm to have fiduciary

responsibility is not only unnecessary, it will have a negative impact on our future

success. Radian Research, Inc., through our independent ESOP trustee, engage an

independent valuation firm annually to calculate the value of our company at its

yearend.  Our internal ESOP Committee and our independent trustee already have that

fiduciary responsibility.  That responsibility is taken very seriously and we are careful in

choosing a valuation company that has strong credentials and a solid reputation. 

If the propose rule is enacted, it will force the valuation companies pass their additional

risk exposure to their clients in the form of higher fees.  In these difficult and uncertain

economic times, it seems that every week a new fee or tax or other cost is introduced

by a federal, state or local regulation.  These costs continue to mount making it more

and more difficult to successfully operate our business.

On behalf of the employee owners of Radian Research, I urge you not to implement this

proposal.

Respectfully, 

Larry Anderson

VP Finance

765‐449‐5504

This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information that is privileged,

confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this

message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination,

distribution, copying, or communication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you

have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e‐

mail or call 765‐449‐5500 and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you.
§ 8.9 Information Security Review Committee. ( a ) The Department of Transportation Information Security Review Committee has the authority to: ( 1 ) Act on all suggestions and complaints not otherwise resolved with respect to the Department's administration of Executive Order 13526 and implementing directives, including those regarding overclassification, failure to declassify, or delay in declassifying;
( 2 ) Act on appeals of requests for classification reviews, and appeals of requests for records under 5 U.S.C. 552 (Freedom of Information Act) when the initial, and proposed final, denials are based on continued classification of the record; and
( 3 ) Recommend to the Secretary, when necessary, appropriate administrative action to correct abuse or violation of any provision of Executive Order 12598 and implementing directives.
( b ) The Information Security Review Committee will be composed of the Assistant Secretary for Administration, who will serve as Chair; the General Counsel; and the Director of Security. When matters affecting a particular Departmental component are at issue, the Associate Administrator for Administration for that component (or for the Federal Aviation Administration, the Associate Administrator for Security and Hazardous Materials Safety) will participate as an ad hoc member, together with the Chief Counsel of that component. Any regular member may designate a representative with full power to serve in his/her place.
( c ) In carrying out its responsibilities to review decisions to revoke or not to issue clearances, or to deny access to classified information, the Committee will establish whatever procedures it deems fit.
[62 FR 23661, May 1, 1997, as amended at 81 FR 45981, July 15, 2016]
# Artillery Marines returning home

/ Published Nov. 30, 2017
Nov. 30, 2017Release # 20171130-02FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**SOUTHWEST ASIA -** Some battle-tested Marines are heading home soon.1st Battalion, 10th Marine Regiment arrived here Sept. 15 this year, replacing a previous unit. The Marines supported Coalition partner forces with precise artillery strikes in the fight against ISIS in Raqqah, Syria. With the city liberated and ISIS on the run, the unit has been ordered home. Its replacements have been called off."With a 155mm artillery battery in the fight, their mission was to deny and disrupt ISIS from gaining ground or moving from their defensive positions," said Marine Artillery Lt. Col. Jon O'Gorman, chief of fires for Combined Joint Task Force - Operation Inherent Resolve. "These Marines rained relentless and highly accurate firepower on the enemy."More than 400 Marines and their M777 howitzers supported Coalition forces, isolating Raqqah as Syrian Democratic Forces seized ISIS' so-called capital city. From June 6 through the final liberation of Raqqah Oct. 20, SDF had constant Coalition artillery support.More than 2,500 terrorists were believed to be in Raqqah at the time the offensive began. Raqqawis endured more than three years of ISIS brutality, including forced conscription and public executions under the terrorists' rule. Raqqah became a magnet to foreign fighters who used the area as a training base and planning location for terrorist attacks on Europe and around the globe."The departure of these outstanding Marines is a sign of real progress in the region," said CJTF-OIR director of operations, Brig. Gen. Jonathan Braga. "We're drawing down combat forces where it makes sense, but still continuing our efforts to help Syrian and Iraqi partners maintain security. Our remaining forces will continue to work by, with, and through partner forces to defeat remaining ISIS, prevent a re-emergence of ISIS, and set conditions for international governments and NGOs to help local citizens recover from the horrors of ISIS' short-lived rule."-30-
Editorial Note on Part 572
Editorial Notes: 1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 572.19 Lumbar spine, abdomen and pelvis. ( a ) The lumbar spine, abdomen, and pelvis consist of the part of the torso assembly shown by number SA 103C 030 on drawing SA 103C 001 and conform to each of the applicable drawings listed under this number on drawing SA 103C 002, sheets 10 and 11.
( b ) When subjected to continuously applied force in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section, the lumbar spine assembly shall flex by an amount that permits the rigid thoracic spine to rotate from its initial position in accordance with Figure 18 of this subpart by 40 degrees at a force level of not less than 34 pounds and not more than 47 pounds, and straighten upon removal of the force to within 5 degrees of its initial position.
( c ) *Test procedure.* ( 1 ) The dummy with lower legs removed is positioned in an upright seated position on a seat as indicated in Figure 18, ensuring that all dummy component surfaces are clean, dry and untreated unless otherwise specified.
( 2 ) Attach the pelvis to the seating surface by a bolt C/328, modified as shown in Figure 18, and the upper legs at the knee axial rotation joints by the attachments shown in Figure 18. Tighten the mountings so that the pelvis-lumbar joining surface is horizontal and adjust the femur ball-flange screws at each hip socket joint to 50 inch pounds torque. Remove the head and the neck and install a cylindrical aluminum adapter 2.0 inches in diameter and 2.80 inches long in place of the neck.
( 3 ) Flex the thorax forward 50 degrees and then rearward as necessary to return to its initial position in accordance with Figure 18 unsupported by external means.
( 4 ) Apply a forward pull force in the midsagittal plane at the top of the neck adapter, so that at 40 degrees of the lumbar spine flexion the applied force is perpendicular to the thoracic spine box. Apply the force at any torso deflection rate between 0.5 and 1.5 degrees per second up to 40 degrees of flexion but no further; continue to apply for 10 seconds the force necessary to maintain 40 degrees of flexion, and record the highest applied force at that time. Release all force as rapidly as possible and measure the return angle 3 minutes after the release.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 No. 333-136744, No. 333-127778, No. 333-108561, No. 333-44437
and No. 333-15929) of our report dated March 11, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Comprehensive Care Corporation and subsidiaries included in this Report (Form 10-K) for the period ended December 31,
2007.



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/s/ Kirkland, Russ, Murphy & Tapp P.A.
|Kirkland, Russ, Murphy & Tapp P.A.    
|                                      
|Clearwater, Florida                   
|March 11, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 265 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 265

 Amending the rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit access 
 to classified information by Members who do not have the appropriate 
        security clearance required for viewing the information.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 12, 2001

 Mrs. Myrick submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Amending the rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit access 
 to classified information by Members who do not have the appropriate 
        security clearance required for viewing the information.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITING ACCESS TO CLASSIFIED INFORMATION BY MEMBERS OF 
              HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES WITHOUT SECURITY CLEARANCES.

    Clause 13 of rule XXIII of the rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Before a Member'' and inserting ``(a) 
        Before a Member''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) No Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner may have access 
to classified information (including access through attendance at any 
briefing or other event at which classified information is presented) 
unless the Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner meets the same 
security clearance and confidentiality requirements as employees of the 
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 4.3


 


NOTATION OF GUARANTEE


 


For value received, each Guarantor (which term includes any successor
Person under the Indenture), jointly and severally, unconditionally guarantees,
to the extent set forth in the Indenture and subject to the provisions in the
Indenture, dated as of December 3, 2003 (the “Indenture”),
among Poster Financial Group, Inc., as issuer (the “Company”),
the Guarantors from time to time party thereto and HSBC Bank USA, as trustee
(the “Trustee”), (a) the due and punctual payment
of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest and Additional Interest, if
any, on the Notes, whether at maturity, by acceleration, redemption or
otherwise, the due and punctual payment of interest on overdue principal and
premium, if any, and, to the extent permitted by law, interest and Additional
Interest, if any, and the due and punctual performance of all other obligations
of the Company to the Holders or the Trustee all in accordance with the terms
of the Indenture and (b) in case of any extension of time of payment or renewal
of any Notes or any of such other obligations, that the same will be promptly
paid in full when due or performed in accordance with the terms of the
extension or renewal, whether at stated maturity, by acceleration or otherwise.  The obligations of the Guarantors to the
Holders of Notes and to the Trustee pursuant to the Guarantee and the Indenture
are expressly set forth in Article 10 of the Indenture and reference is hereby
made to the Indenture for the precise terms of the Guarantee.  This Guarantee is subject to release as and
to the extent set forth in Sections 8.02, 8.03 and 10.05 of the Indenture.  Each Holder of a Note, by accepting the same
agrees to and shall be bound by such provisions.  Capitalized terms used herein and not defined are used herein as
so defined in the Indenture.


 


 


	
   

  	
  GNLV, CORP.

  
	
   

  	
  GNL, CORP.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:  

  	
     /s/ Timothy N. Poster

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
    Name:Timothy N. Poster

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
    Title:Chief Executive Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Golden
  Nugget Experience, LLC

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By: GNLV, CORP., as Sole Member

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:  

  	
     /s/ Timothy N. Poster

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
    Name:Timothy N. Poster

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
    Title:Chief Executive Officer
§ 238.301 Scope. ( a ) This subpart contains requirements pertaining to the inspection, testing, and maintenance of passenger equipment operating at speeds not exceeding 125 miles per hour. The requirements in this subpart address the inspection, testing, and maintenance of the brake system as well as other mechanical and electrical components covered by this part.
( b ) Beginning on January 1, 2002, the requirements contained in this subpart shall apply to railroads operating Tier I passenger equipment covered by this part. A railroad may request earlier application of the requirements contained in this subpart upon written notification to FRA's Associate Administrator for Safety as provided in § 238.1(c).
( c ) Paragraphs (b) and (c) of § 238.309 shall apply beginning September 9, 1999.
[64 FR 25660, May 12, 1999, as amended at 65 FR 41307, July 3, 2000]
#### In the Matter of the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of Charles B. Whiting, Deceased. The Comptroller of the State of New York, Appellant; Connecticut Trust and Safe Deposit Company, as Executor, Respondent.

*Matter of*Whiting, 139 App. Div. 905, affirmed.

(Argued November 17, 1910;

decided December 6, 1910.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June *52124, 1910, which affirmed an order of the New York County Surrogate’s Court assessing a transfer tax on the estate of Charles B. Whiting, deceased. The question involved was whether, for any purposes of taxation under the Taxable Transfers Act, the increase or diminution in value of assets between the date of death and the time of distribution may be considered.

*Thomas B. Casey*and *John S. Jenkins*for appellant.

*Thomas Mills Day*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
#### § 377.211 Computation of time.

Time periods involving calendar days shall be calculated pursuant to 49 CFR 386.8.

[80 FR 59072, Oct. 1, 2015]
-----Original Message----- 

From: Thomas S. Ellsworth [mailto:tellswor@slonet.org] 

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 10:18 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 

Keep your hands off of MY money!
§ 382.115 Starting date for testing programs. ( a ) All domestic-domiciled employers must implement the requirements of this part on the date the employer begins commercial motor vehicle operations.
( b ) All foreign-domiciled employers must implement the requirements of this part on the date the employer begins commercial motor vehicle operations in the United States.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7542
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus COREY STEVEN JOHNSON, a/k/a Little Corey, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CR-93-419-JFM, CA-97-1384-JFM) Submitted: February 3, 1998 Decided: March 12, 1998 Before WIDENER, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Corey Steven Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Moss Ringler, AndreaL. Smith, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Johnson , Nos. CR-93-419-JFM; CA-97-1384-JFM (D. Md. Sept. 30, 1997). We deny the motion for stay and dispensewith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 10-K
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,845
<SECURITIES>                                     1,979
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,474
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,409
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,029
<PP&E>                                           7,433
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,199
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,192
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,200
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,781
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,846
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,821
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,192
<SALES>                                         45,873
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,873
<CGS>                                           40,640
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,640
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (239)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,617
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,472
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,832
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,832
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,832
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .85<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .79
<FN>
<F1>Earnings per share have been restated to comply with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 128. The quarters ending September 30
and June 30, 1997 and fiscal years 1997 and 1996 have been restated for the
effects of SFAS No. 128. EPS-PRIMARY reflects EPS-BASIC for all periods
presented.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>