alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

(2004/C 84 E/0712)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0589/04

by Camilo Nogueira Román (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(26 February 2004)

Subject:   Enlargement of an airport in the administrative and political capital of Spain: use of Cohesion Fund monies granted to Spain for extending infrastructure in Madrid

The Spanish Prime Minister, José María Aznar, has just inaugurated the civil engineering works to enlarge Madrid airport. There will be a new terminal, and new runways. The final budget is EUR 2 440 million, and the new facilities will be operational in 2005. The Spanish Government is seeking to make this airport one of the largest and most attractive in Europe. This extraordinary amount of investment is being made in an airport which, today, already centralises and even monopolises Spanish air traffic. This new investment highlights once again the fact that the Spanish capital receives economic benefits from the Spanish Government on such a scale that the business world, political and economic decision-making, and even Spain's entire land and air traffic are concentrated in it.

Does the Commission know whether money from the Community Cohesion Fund is being used in extending the airport? If so, what percentage of the monies from the Cohesion Fund assigned to the Spanish State has been or will be used in this airport? More generally, what percentage of grants to Spain from the Cohesion Fund have been or are scheduled to be used within the Madrid autonomous community?

Answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(31 March 2004)

So far the only Madrid-Barajas Airport extension project that we have approved (by a decision of 24 December 2002) is for construction of the INTRA automated people mover system for the new terminal area. The eligible costs are EUR 98 040 921 and the contribution from the Fund is EUR 41 177 186 (42 %). No part-financing from the European Regional Development Fund has been granted for the airport under the single programming document Objective 2 Madrid 2000-2006.

The national authorities are responsible for selecting and submitting projects for Cohesion Fund part-financing to us. We examine them using the criteria set in Article 10 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1164/94 of 16 May 1994 establishing a Cohesion Fund (1). These criteria do not include location. In the Official Journal references have been given for the decisions for 2000 (2), 2001 (3) and 2002 (4) granting Cohesion Fund assistance to Spain. Those for 2003 will be published this year.

----

(1)OJ L 130, 25.5.1994.

(2)OJ C 361, 17.12.2001.

(3)OJ C 126, 28.5.2002.

(4)OJ C 123, 24.5.2003.

----
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hamptons Luxury Homes, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank Dalene, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. August 14, 2007 /s/ Frank Dalene________________Frank Dalene
Chief Financial Officer, Vice President and Secretary
§ 663.35 Post-delivery Buy America certification. For purposes of this part, a post-delivery Buy America certification is a certification that the recipient keeps on file that— ( a ) There is a letter from FTA which grants a waiver to the rolling stock received from the Buy America requirements under sections 165 (b)(1), or (b)(4) of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982, as amended; or
( b ) The recipient is satisfied that the rolling stock received meets the requirements of section 165 (a) or (b)(3) of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982, as amended, after having reviewed itself or by means of an audit prepared by someone other than the manufacturer or its agent documentation provided by the manufacturer which lists— ( 1 ) Components and subcomponent parts of the rolling stock identified by manufacturer of the parts, their country of origin and costs; and
( 2 ) The actual location of the final assembly point for the rolling stock including a description of the activities which took place at the final assembly point and the cost of the final assembly.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated:  May 7, 2008
    /s/ Ben M. BrighamBen M. BrighamChief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the
Board
**Exhibit 10.27**

 

**2008Compensation Information for Executive Officers**

 
| **Name and Title**                                  | ** ** | **Bonus** | ** ** | **Salary** | ** ** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------|------------|------------|------------|
| James M. Gower                                                |       | $         | 360,000    |       | $          | 600,000 |   |
| Chief Executive Officer                                       |       |      |       |       |       |
| Ryan D. Maynard                                               |       | $         | 120,000    |       | $          | 300,000 |   |
| Chief Financial Officer and Vice President                    |       |      |       |       |       |
| Donald G. Payan                                               |       | $         | 241,500    |       | $          | 483,000 |   |
| Executive Vice President, President of Discovery and Research |       |      |       |       |       |
| Elliot B. Grossbard                                           |       | $         | 225,000    |       | $          | 450,000 |   |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Medical Officer               |       |      |       |       |       |
| Raul R. Rodriguez                                             |       | $         | 215,000    |       | $          | 430,000 |   |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer             |       |      |       |       |       |
| Dolly A. Vance                                                |       | $         | 175,500    |       | $          | 390,000 |   |
| Senior Vice President, General Counsel                        |       |      |       |       |       |
| Robin Copper                                                  |       | $         | 76,125     |       | $          | 217,500 |   |
| Senior Vice President, Pharmaceutical Sciences                |       |      |       |       |       |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to the requirement set forth inRule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended(the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of theUnited States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), James M. Gower, Chief Executive Officerof Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), and Ryan Maynard, ActingChief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the bestof his knowledge:

1.                                       TheCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,2007, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “PeriodicReport”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

InWitness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of May 10,2007.
| /s/ JAMES M. GOWER      |   | /s/ RYAN D. MAYNARD                        |
|-------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
| James M. Gower          |   | Ryan D. Maynard                            |
| Chief Executive Officer |   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q towhich it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of RigelPharmaceuticals, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after thedate of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing.

 

----
IV

House Calendar No. 116

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 321

[Report No. 107–349]

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 19, 2001

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported

from the Committee on Rules.

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of Thursday, December 20,

6 2001, providing for consideration or disposition of a con7 ference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 3338) making
2

HRES 321 RH

1 appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fis2 cal year ending September 30, 2002, and for other pur3 poses.

House Calendar No. 116

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 321

[Report No. 107–349]

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII

with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

DECEMBER 19, 2001

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 70 FR 56098, Sept. 23, 2005.

§ 173.415 Authorized Type A packages. The following packages are authorized for shipment if they do not contain quantities exceeding A1 or A2 as appropriate: ( a ) DOT Specification 7A (see § 178.350 of this subchapter) Type A general packaging. Each offeror of a Specification 7A package must maintain on file for at least two years after the offeror's latest shipment, and shall provide to DOT on request, one of the following: ( 1 ) A description of the package showing materials of construction, dimensions, weight, closure and closure materials (including gaskets, tape, etc.) of each item of the containment system, shielding and packing materials used in normal transportation, and the following: ( i ) If the packaging is subjected to the physical tests of § 173.465, and if applicable, § 173.466, documentation of testing, including date, place of test, signature of testers, a detailed description of each test performed including equipment used, and the damage to each item of the containment system resulting from the tests, or
( ii ) For any other demonstration of compliance with tests authorized in § 173.461, a detailed analysis which shows that, for the contents being shipped, the package meets the pertinent design and performance requirements for a DOT 7A Type A specification package.
( 2 ) If the offeror has obtained the packaging from another person who meets the definition of “packaging manufacturer” in § 178.350(c) of this subchapter, a certification from the packaging manufacturer that the package meets all the requirements of § 178.350 for the radioactive contents presented for transport and a copy of documents maintained by the packaging manufacturer that meet the requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( b ) Any other Type A packaging that also meets the applicable standards for fissile materials in 10 CFR part 71 and is used in accordance with § 173.471.
( c ) Any Type B(U) or Type B(M) packaging authorized pursuant to § 173.416.
( d ) Any foreign-made packaging that meets the standards in the ” IAEA Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material, SSR-6” (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter) and bears the marking “Type A”. Such packagings may be used for domestic and export shipments of Class 7 (radioactive) materials provided the offeror obtains the applicable documentation of tests and engineering evaluations and maintains the documentation on file in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section. These packagings must conform with requirements of the country of origin (as indicated by the packaging marking) and the IAEA regulations applicable to Type A packagings.
[Amdt. 173-244, 60 FR 50307, Sept. 28, 1995, as amended at 67 FR 61014, Sept. 27, 2002; 68 FR 75742, Dec. 31, 2003; 69 FR 3673, Jan. 26, 2004; 69 FR 55117, Sept. 13, 2004; 79 FR 40612, July 11, 2014; 80 FR 1163, Jan. 8, 2015; 85 FR 83401, Dec. 21, 2020]
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: July 9, 2014

TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Region 7, EPA

SUBJECT: June 27, 2014, Meeting Regarding Proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing 

Power Plants

SUMMARY

A conference call was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on June 27, 2014

to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. The majority of the 

discussion centered on how goals were established for the state of Kansas. The Carbon Power 

Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES

EPA Headquarters:

Jan Cortelyou-Lee

Brian Fisher

Ryan Sims

Erich Eschmann

EPA Region 7:

Joshua Tapp

Mark A. Smith

Ward Burns

Larry Gonzalez

Toni Gargas

Kansas Department of Health and 

Environment:

Rick Brunetti

Miles Stotts

Melissa Weide
Ms. Lynne Liddington, Dir ector UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REG I ON 4 ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 61 FORSYTH STREET ATLA N TA , GEORGIA 30303-896 0 

# APR 1 9 2016

Knox County Department of Air Quality Management 140 D ameron Avenue Knoxville , Tennessee 37917 Dear Ms
. Liddington : Enclosed is the final end-of-year report for your agency ' s FY 20 15 Air Pollution Control grant authorized by §105 of the Clean Air Act. This report outlines your agency ' s various grant commitments and their status. Since there were no issues and no adjustments necessary, your report is now fma li zed
. Thi s letter documents the conclusion of the joint evaluation process required 

### by 40 Code of Federal Regulations 35.115 and identified as a commitment in your FY 2015 A ir Planning Agreement under Cross Cutting Issues. We appreciate the progress you made in FY 2015 and look forward to continuing our joint efforts to protect and improve air quality. If you have any questions regarding your grant, please contact Stuart Perry at (404) 562-8980 or Gwendolyn Graf at ( 404) 562-9289
.

Enclosure Carol L. Kernker Acting Director Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division

I n te rn et Add ress ( URL) • http://www .e p a.g ov Recyc l ed/Recyclable • Pri nted with Vegetab l e Oil Based I nks o n Recycled P ape r ( Mi nimum 30% Postconsu m er)
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0995.html[7/22/2015 6:08:45 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-xsfb

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0995

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

Address: United States, 

General Comment

I believe that you are mistaken and I am well educated so I am fully able of making my own decisions on a

 retirement plan. I do need someone to manage my retirement for me.
§ 630.3 Definitions. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided, terms defined in 49 U.S.C. 5302 *et seq.* apply to this part.
( b ) Except as otherwise provided, terms defined in the current editions of the National Transit Database Reporting Manuals and the NTD Uniform System of Accounts are used in this part as so defined.
( c ) For purposes of this part:
*Administrator* means the Federal Transit Administrator or the Administrator's designee.
*Applicant* means an entity seeking Federal financial assistance under 49 U.S.C. chapter 53.
*Assistance* means Federal financial assistance for the planning, acquisition, construction, or operation of public transportation services.
*Beneficiary* means any entity that receives benefits from assistance under 49 U.S.C. 5307 or 5311.
*Current edition* of the National Transit Database Reporting Manuals and Uniform System of Accounts means the most recently issued editions of the reference documents.
*Days* mean calendar days.
*Reference Document(s)* means the current editions of the National Transit Database Reporting Manuals and Uniform System of Accounts. These documents are subject to periodic revision. Beneficiaries and applicants are responsible for using the current editions of the reference documents.
*Reporting entity* means an entity required to provide reports as set forth in the reference documents.
*State Department of Transportation* means the Department of Transportation of a State of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, American Samoa, or the U.S. Virgin Islands.
*Transit agency* means an entity providing public transportation as defined in 49 U.S.C. 5302.
[72 FR 68761, Dec. 6, 2007, as amended at 81 FR 48969, July 26, 2016]
From: Virgil Rose [mailto:vrose68@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 1:50 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Comments on RII for retirement annuity provisions

As person very near retirement and a lon history of both 401k and IRA contributions, I 

offer the following two thoughts: 

• Even though many retirees are not accumulating enough to provide an adequate 

income through an annuity, providing the annuity potential information on an 

annual basis would certainly spur workers on to set more aside for their retirement 

• If the federal government would set up an insurance program to back up the 

private insurance company annuity plans, it would encourage retirees to take 

advantage of this option without fear of losing their life savings in an insurance 

company failure such as AIG recent problems. 

Virgil Rose 

•

__________________________________________________________________

_________ 

Virgil Rose...Tel: 650-572-8005...Cell: 415-310-5814...PO Box 4808, Foster City, 

CA 94404
From: ROBERT DIXON [mailto:FAYELEE@COX.NET] 

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 2:20 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

Do I want you people watching over my 401k? Hell no!!!! This sounds like a typical progressive stunt to 

me to gain hold of all our finances and

use it to serve your own ends! The very first and last thing I would ever trust on this earth, is the Feds. 

Taking our savings is a way for you to get your

hands on more money because you are broke. You have exhausted every avenue and you have us so deep 

in debt it is scary to think that we may not

see the light of day. How about if you just cut your spending, fire a few thousand of the unnecessary 

people on the Obama payroll, that should help some.

 

I can just see you people with all the 401ks, drooling over what you got your hands on. Then, figuring out 

how long each of us will live and then pay us a monthly

payment (no doubt small at that). Then, when we die, guess what, you keep your hot greedy hands on it. 

 

Our 401k was not set up just to give us a monthly payment, but for other things as well. And when you 

take control of it away from us, we will no longer

have those options. You will be doling out just the minimum so you can keep more for yourself. 

 

Forget it, we want nothing to do with any of you and don't think you will get your hands on our 401k 

because we will never allow it to happen. Tell Geithner and all

his little playmates at the Treasury to Go To ----!

 

The Dixons
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

June 26, 2012

Order 

June 26, 2012

145202 & (50)(51)

NADIA AWAD,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 145202

v CoA: 302692

Wayne CC: 01-013011-CK

GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE

CORP (GMAC),

Defendant-Appellee,

and

WAYNE COUNTY BOARD OF

COMMISSIONERS and ORLANS

ASSOCIATE, P.C.,

Defendants.

____________________________________

On order of the Court, it appearing that proceedings in this case are stayed by the 

filing of a petition in bankruptcy (In re GMAC, Bankruptcy Court for the Southern 

District of New York, docket No. 12-12020), the case is administratively CLOSED 

without prejudice and without decision on the merits. Once the stay is no longer in 

effect, this case may be reopened on the motion of any party filed within 42 days after the 

date of the order removing the stay.
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THTE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the annual report of AmBase  Corporation (the "Company")
on Form  10-K  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2007 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P.
Ferrara, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  March 28, 2008
                                               /s/ John P. Ferrara
                                               ------------------------------
                                               John P. Ferrara
                                               Vice President and
                                               Chief Financial Officer

AmBase Corporation