alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

(2004/C 88 E/0186)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0378/04

by Hartmut Nassauer (PPE-DE) and Bernd Lange (PSE) to the Commission

(12 February 2004)

Subject:   Planned draft second directive on limit values providing for the establishment of an indicative occupational exposure limit value, ‘inter alia’ for nitrogen monoxide (NO)

Given that the Commission is planning to drastically reduce the occupational exposure limit value for nitrogen monoxide on the recommendation of SCOEL,

can it answer the following questions:

Answer given by Mr Dimas on behalf of the Commission

(20 April 2004)

----

(1)  Council Directive 98/24/EC of 7 April 1998 on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the risks related to chemical agents at work (fourteenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC), OJ L 131, 5.5.1998.

(2)  95/320/EC: Commission Decision 95/320/EC of 12 July 1995 setting up a Scientific Committee for Occupational Exposure Limits to Chemical Agents, OJ L 188, 9.8.1995.

(3)  http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/health_safety/publicat/sum_89_nitrogen_monoxide.pdf

http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/health_safety/publicat/sum_89_nitrogen_monoxide.pdf

(4)  Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances, OJ P 196, 6.8.1967.

(5)  Commission Directive 91/322/EEC of 29 May 1991 on establishing indicative limit values by implementing Council Directive 80/1107/EEC on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to chemical, physical and biological agents at work, OJ L 177, 5.7.1991.

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 801

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 801 appear at 86 FR 54641, Oct. 4, 2021.

#### § 801.57 Records compiled for law enforcement purposes.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(7), any records compiled for law or regulatory enforcement are exempt from public disclosure to the extent that disclosure would interfere with enforcement, would be an unwarranted invasion of privacy, would disclose the identity of a confidential source, would disclose investigative procedures and practices, or would endanger the life or security of law enforcement personnel.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

49–011 2005

109th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 109–70 

NOTIFICATION TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT 

WITH THE EUROPEAN UNION, JAPAN, THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA, AND TAIWAN 

MESSAGE 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH 

THE EUROPEAN UNION, JAPAN, THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA, AND 

TAIWAN ON TARIFF TREATMENT FOR MULTI-CHIP INTEGRATED 

CIRCUITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2103(a)(1) OF THE 

TRADE ACT OF 2002 

NOVEMBER 16, 2005.—Message and accompanying papers referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means and ordered to be printed 


E:\Seals\Congress.#13
(1) 

To the Congress of the United States: 

Consistent with section 2103(a)(1) of the Trade Act of 2002, I am 

pleased to notify the Congress of my intention to enter into an 

agreement with the European Union, Japan, the Republic of Korea, 

and Taiwan on tariff treatment for multi-chip integrated circuits. 

Multi-chip integrated circuits are semiconductor devices used in 

computers, cell phones, and other high-technology products. 

United States-based companies are the principal suppliers to the 

world of multi-chip integrated circuits. In 2004, global sales of finished multi-chip integrated circuits were estimated to be $4.2 billion, and U.S. semiconductor companies account for roughly half of 

those sales. 

The United States, the European Union, the Republic of Korea, 

and Taiwan will apply zero duties on these products as of an 

agreed date. The target date for entry into force of the Agreement 

is January 1, 2006. Japan already applies zero duties on these 

products and expects to ratify the Agreement formally in 2006. 

Further, although all major producers of multi-chip integrated circuits will be parties to the Agreement, we will seek to build on this 

Agreement by joining together to work in the World Trade Organization to increase the number of countries granting duty-free treatment to these products. 

GEORGE W. BUSH. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, November 14, 2005. 

Æ
#### § 605.10 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to formulate procedures for the development of an agreement concerning school bus operations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          13,265
<SECURITIES>                                    44,296
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,178
<ALLOWANCES>                                       409
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,330
<PP&E>                                           4,352
<DEPRECIATION>                                     817
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  85,865
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,158
<BONDS>                                         19,070
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,640
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            99
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,898
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    85,865
<SALES>                                         34,457
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,457
<CGS>                                           14,716
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,716
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,891
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,096
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,754
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,099
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,655
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,655
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .91
        

</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEffects of rotation on coolant passage heat transfer. Volume 1: Coolant passages with smooth wallsAn experimental program was conducted to investigate heat transfer and pressure loss characteristics of rotating multipass passages, for configurations and dimensions typical of modern turbine blades. The immediate objective was the generation of a data base of heat transfer and pressure loss data required to develop heat transfer correlations and to assess computational fluid dynamic techniques for rotating coolant passages. Experiments were conducted in a smooth wall large scale heat transfer model.Document ID19910021175Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsHajek, T. J.*(Pratt and Whitney Aircraft East Hartford, CT, United States)*Wagner, J. H.*(Pratt and Whitney Aircraft East Hartford, CT, United States)*Johnson, B. V.*(Pratt and Whitney Aircraft East Hartford, CT, United States)*Higgins, A. W.*(Pratt and Whitney Aircraft East Hartford, CT, United States)*Steuber, G. D.*(Pratt and Whitney Aircraft East Hartford, CT, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1991Publication InformationPublisher: NASASubject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberAD-A272182NAS 1.26:4396-VOL-1NASA-CR-4396-VOL-1E-6470Accession Number91N30489Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-23691Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910021175.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 594.2 Purpose.

The purposes of this part is to ensure that NHTSA is reimbursed for costs incurred in administering the importer registration program, in making determinations whether a nonconforming vehicle is eligible for importation into the United States, and in processing the bond furnished to the Secretary of the Treasury given to ensure that an imported vehicle not originally manufactured to conform to all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards is brought into compliance with the safety standards, or will be exported, or abandoned to the United States.
----

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(2004/C 115/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids

----
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, October 30, 1995 (136), Para 136.5 Communications]
[Page 1799]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.136.5  communications

  Executive and other communications, pursuant to clause 2, rule XXIV, 
were referred as follows:

       1571. A letter from the Energy Information Administration, 
     Department of Energy, transmitting a copy of a report 
     entitled ``Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United 
     States, 1987-1994,'' the third in a series of annual reports; 
     to the Committee on Commerce.
       1572. A letter from the Director, Defense Security 
     Assistance Agency, transmitting notification concerning the 
     Department of the Army's proposed Letter(s) of Offer and 
     Acceptance [LOA] to Norway for defense articles and services 
     (Transmittal No. 96-05), pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 2776(b); to 
     the Committee on International Relations.
       1573. A letter from the Director, Defense Security 
     Assistance Agency, transmitting notification concerning the 
     Department of the Army's proposed Letter(s) of Offer and 
     Acceptance [LOA] to Denmark for defense articles and services 
     (Transmittal No. 96-06), pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 2776(b); to 
     the Committee on International Relations.
```
# CENTCOM releases Wanat investigation

/ Published June 23, 2010

MAC DILL AFB,  Fla. (June 23, 2010) –  The U.S. Central Command  investigation into the combat action that occurred at Wanat,  Afghanistan, on July 13, 2008 has been released and posted online at  CENTCOM’s Freedom of  Information Act Reading Room. To view those documents, click here.

Upon recommendation  by Department of Defense  Inspector General and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Office of the Secretary of  Defense directed CENTCOM to reinvestigate the combat action that  occurred at Wanat.  The investigating officer was Lt. Gen. Richard  Natonski and the deputy investigating officer was Maj. Gen. David  Perkins.

The investigation  team conducted interviews and collected evidence during several  thousands of investigative hours across three months at Fort Leavenworth, Kans.;  Vicenza, Italy; Fort Benning, Ga.; and Norfolk, Va.  Forty-eight  witnesses from all levels of command were interviewed under oath.  The  investigation team collected and reviewed thousands of pages of data, to  include doctrinal publications; operational reports and summaries;  maps; charts; photographs; intelligence summaries; briefings; notes;  logs; and the report of the initial investigation directed by the  Combined Joint Task Force  101 Commander.

The opinions and  conclusions of the investigation  report include:

§       No one single person, action, or decision caused this  event to occur; it was the result of a confluence of factors and a  series of events.

§       There was  no intentional wrongdoing on the part of anyone in the chain of command.

§       Dereliction  resulted from inaction prior to the battle.  Dereliction of duty was found at the  Company, Battalion and Brigade  Commander levels.

§       A lack of  detailed planning and supervision at battalion level and below  contributed to the outcome of events at Wanat.

§       The  Soldiers at Wanat fought courageously and in the highest traditions of  the nation and the U.S. Army.  Non-commissioned officer (NCO) leadership  was particularly outstanding.

The investigation  was completed in January and forwarded to the Department of the Army as a  matter under its cognizance, as units involved had redeployed and were no longer under  CENTCOM’s command authority.

Copies of the  investigation were also forwarded to U.S. Forces - Afghanistan, ISAF and U.S.  Joint Forces Command for their use in development of lessons learned and  sharing of those lessons.

“This was a  thorough investigation done with painstaking attention to detail over  three months, reviewing thousands of pages of documents and reams of  information,” said Rear  Admiral Hal Pittman, a CENTCOM spokesman.  “We stand by the  investigation’s findings of fact, opinions and recommendations, and we  support the process by which it was adjudicated.”
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Heritage Worldwide,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  February 10, 2005                          /s/ Alain Sereyjol-Garros
                                                  -------------------------
                                                      Alain Sereyjol-Garros
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
From: Bill Zuk [mailto:wmezuk@gmail.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 6:17 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

This is what the Olson Group in Morgan Stanley did to us:

put over 80% of our funds into high cost low yield annuities.

big commission for them.

We trusted them 100% & said we know you'll do what's best for us, make our money work 

hard for us.

 They took advantage of 2 old seniors & locked us in for 9 years.

When we finally found out what they did ... we fired those bums but still stuck in annuities.

Thanks for listening

Bill Zuk wmezuk@gmail.com
###### Editorial Note on Part 801

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 801 appear at 86 FR 54641, Oct. 4, 2021.

#### § 801.50 Exemptions from disclosure.

Title 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and (b) exempt certain records from public disclosure. Examples of records given in this subpart included within a particular statutory exemption are not necessarily illustrative of all types of records covered by the applicable exemption.
# F-16s practice ACE capabilities during Sky Shield III

/ Published Sept. 29, 2021
PRINCE SULTAN AIR BASE, KSA, 
PRINCE SULTAN AIR BASE, KSA – A contingent of aircraft and personnel assigned to the 378th Air Expeditionary Wing traveled to Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar, to participate in Exercise Shy Shield III, a bilateral defensive counter air and combat search and rescue exercise, July 31 – Aug 5, 2021.In addition to integrating U.S. operations with the Qatar Emiri Air Force, the event allowed the 378th AEW to demonstrate its agile combat employment capabilities of repositioning forces in various locations and rapidly generating combat airpower.ACE is a concept that utilizes networks of bases, multi-capable Airmen, pre-positioned equipment and airlift operations to swiftly employ forces around the globe.“Participating in events like Sky Shield allows us to evaluate our ability to quickly move to and operate out of different locations,” said U.S. Air Force Lt. Col. Christopher Wilson, 121st Expeditionary Fighter Squadron commander. “This week showed that we are able to shift forces quickly, successfully integrating with Qatari fighter operations and working together as a team to achieve a common goal in the defensive counter-air mission set.”Both aircrew and maintenance personnel accomplished the move, generating F-16 sorties for the exercise while incorporating numerous ACE capabilities in support of the training event.“Every time we operate out of a new location there is a period of adjusting – especially when we practice being as self-sufficient and self-sustaining as possible like we did last week,” said U.S. Air Force Maj. Jaresha Obey, 121st Expeditionary Fighter Generation Squadron commander. “Exercises such as Sky Shield help us reduce that timeline; I am extremely proud of my team’s ability to adjust and generate aircraft so quickly.”In addition to standard sortie generation, the maintainers also accomplished several hot-pit refuelings during the exercise, demonstrating an agile and efficient method of returning aircraft to the mission as quickly as possible.“We routinely train on skills like hot pits, but to be able to do it at another base and for multiple sorties demonstrates the success of the training and further develops these abilities,” said Obey.The event was the first opportunity for the newly-arrived fighter and fighter generation squadrons to validate their ACE capabilities within the AOR and continues to show the commitment to excellence and the war-fighting capabilities of the 378th AEW.“It is critical that we continue to improve and demonstrate our agile employment capabilities,” said U.S. Air Force Brig. Gen. Robert Davis, 378th AEW commander. “Our success in Exercise Sky Shield III proves our increased ability to integrate with regional partners and rapidly project airpower across the region when needed.”
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: August 13, 2015 520100 

________________________________

In the Matter of ANONYMOUS,

Appellant,

v

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting

Commissioner of Corrections

and Community Supervision,

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: June 8, 2015

Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Garry, Devine and Clark, JJ.

__________

Anonymous, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H.

Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (O'Connor, J.),

entered October 23, 2014 in Albany County, which dismissed

petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR

article 78, to review a determination of respondent finding

petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Judgment affirmed. No opinion.

Lahtinen, J.P., Garry, Devine and Clark, JJ., concur.
-2- 520100 

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs. 

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 332 Agreed to House (ATH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 332

     To inform the Senate that a quorum of the House has assembled.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 23, 2002

Mr. Armey submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     To inform the Senate that a quorum of the House has assembled.

    Resolved, That the Clerk of the House inform the Senate that a 
quorum of the House is present and that the House is ready to proceed 
with business.
                                 <all>
```
Jan. 24: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL in Syria and Iraq
 By CJTF - Operation Inherent Resolve News Release
  January 24, 2015 Release # 2015024FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **SOUTHWEST ASIA -** On Jan. 23, U.S. and Coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria, using attack, bomber, fighter, and remotely piloted aircraft to conduct 13 airstrikes. Separately, U.S. and Coalition military forces conducted 13 airstrikes in Iraq, using attack, bomber, fighter, and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL terrorists. All strikes took place between 8 a.m., Jan. 23, and 8 a.m., Jan. 24, local time. The following is a summary of the strikes conducted since the last press release: **Syria***  Near Kobani, 12 airstrikes struck eight ISIL tactical units and a large ISIL unit and destroyed an ISIL vehicle, an ISIL building, and eight ISIL fighting positions.*  Near Al Hasakah, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL mobile oil drilling rig. **Iraq***  Near Al Qaim, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL weapons production facility.*  Near Mosul, five airstrikes struck two large ISIL units, an ISIL choke point, an ISIL culvert, and four ISIL roads, and destroyed an ISIL culvert and an ISIL vehicle.*  Near Ramadi, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL vehicle.*  Near Tal Afar, five airstrikes struck a large ISIL unit, two ISIL tactical units, an ISIL cantonment area, and an ISIL vehicle, and destroyed an ISIL building, six ISIL vehicles, an ISIL bunker, two ISIL shipping containers, and two ISIL checkpoints.*  Near Erbil, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL shipping container, two ISIL vehicles, and three ISIL earth moving vehicles. Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely. The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria, the region, and the wider international community. The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations conducting airstrikes in Iraq include the U.S., Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. Coalition nations conducting airstrikes in Syria include the U.S., Bahrain, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.
From: JOCASS824@cs.com [mailto:JOCASS824@cs.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 4:38 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN1210-AB33 

ARE YOU INSANe? If the govt tries this, the people will call up the troops 

Joan Casson, Albuquerque