alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# U.S. Central Command Visits the Leadership of the Sultan’s Armed Forces

/ Published Oct. 19, 2022

Oct. 19, 2022

Release Number 20221019-09

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**OMAN**– On Oct. 18, at the Al Murtafa'a Garrison in Muscat, Gen. Michael “Erik” Kurilla, commander of U.S. Central Command, met Air Vice Marshal Khamis Hammad Al Ghafri, commander of the Royal Air Force of Oman and Dr. Mohammed al Zaabi, Secretary General of the Oman Ministry of Defense. The engagement was Kurilla’s second visit here in the past five months.

The leaders spoke about matters of importance to both militaries, including opportunities to strengthen security cooperation through training and partnered exercises.

“These areas allow us to strengthen our relations while bolstering regional security,” Kurilla said. “I see only tremendous opportunity in our partnership with the Sultan’s Armed Forces.”

Kurilla thanked the Omani leaders for Oman’s role in the release earlier this month of Baquer Namazi, an Iranian American wrongly detained in Iran for seven years. The role the Sultanate of Oman played was critical in arranging his flight out of Iran.

“USCENTCOM’s strategic approach is summarized by people, partners, and innovation. One of our most reliable partners is right here in Oman. We are grateful for Oman’s continued support of stability and security in the region,” Kurilla said.

The partnership with Oman, inaugurated by a treaty in 1833, is the oldest and longest-enduring U.S. military partnership in the USCENTCOM area of responsibility.  

The Royal Navy of Oman is also a participant in the Combined Maritime Forces, the world’s largest maritime partnership, headquartered in Bahrain. Through the CMF, Oman supports the rules-based international order in the Arabian Sea.

-30-
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 298 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 298

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Veterans Day 
  should continue to be observed on November 11 and separate from any 
    other Federal holiday or day for Federal elections or national 
                              observances.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 29, 2001

 Mr. Terry (for himself, Mr. Frelinghuysen, Mr. Aderholt, Mr. Bonilla, 
 Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Gilman, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. Hobson, 
Mr. Jones of North Carolina, Mrs. Kelly, Mr. King, Mr. Knollenberg, Mr. 
Levin, Mr. Pascrell, Mr. Quinn, Mr. Shows, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. 
 Tiahrt, and Mr. Walsh) submitted the following resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Veterans Day 
  should continue to be observed on November 11 and separate from any 
    other Federal holiday or day for Federal elections or national 
                              observances.

Whereas the veterans of the Armed Forces are owed a tremendous debt of gratitude 
        for their service and bravery;
Whereas veterans play important roles in communities throughout the United 
        States;
Whereas maintaining Veterans Day as a legal public holiday separate from all 
        other Federal holidays and days for elections or national observances is 
        the least that a grateful Nation should do in recognition of its 
        veterans; and
Whereas November 11 is a solemn commemoration of the contributions of those who 
        have served and defended the Nation, especially those who gave their 
        lives securing the freedoms enjoyed by all citizens of the United 
        States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
Veterans Day should continue to be observed on November 11 and separate 
from any other Federal holiday or day for Federal elections or national 
observances.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. delivers medical expertise, military equipment to Lebanon
 By None  , U.S. Embassy, Lebanon
  BEIRUT, Lebanon (April 6, 2010) — In early April 2010, the U.S. government reached out to the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) through a joint US Army - LAF medical team visit.     The U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) Command Surgeon team, made up of American military medical experts, visited their counterparts at the LAF and toured several LAF medical facilities throughout the country. The American medical officers were impressed by the dedication and professionalism  of their LAF counterparts who are dedicated to providing the  best possible care to Lebanese soldiers and their  beneficiaries.  Both the American and Lebanese teams of doctors  shared experiences and are looking forward to conducting  future bilateral training opportunities.    Also on April  2, the United States delivered to the LAF the first in a series of shipments of weapons and ammunition. This shipment included 1,000 M16A4 rifles, 10 missile launchers, 1,583 grenade launchers, and  538 sets of day/night binoculars and night-vision devices. This equipment will be supported with training provided by the United States government.     The United States is committed to providing assistance to the LAF  to help them increase their capacity.  This assistance includes training and equipment to meet the LAF's long-term needs which the Lebanese government has identified in its five-year plan for the LAF in order  to protect Lebanese citizens, counter terrorism, and to fulfill  its duties throughout the country.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Colonial
  Commercial Corp. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002
  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
  "Report"), I, Bernard Korn, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
  pursuant to section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

             (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

             (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

  By: /S/ BERNARD KORN
  -----------------------
  Name:  BERNARD KORN
  Chief Executive Officer
  November 14, 2003




<PAGE>
§ 821.20 Subpoenas, witness fees, and appearances of Board Members, officers and employees. ( a ) *Subpoenas.* Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, subpoenas requiring the attendance of witnesses, or the production of documentary or tangible evidence, for the purpose of taking depositions or at a hearing, may be issued by the presiding law judge (or the chief law judge, if the proceeding has not been assigned to a law judge) upon application by any party. The application shall show the general relevance and reasonable scope of the evidence sought. Any person upon whom a subpoena is served may, within 7 days after service of the subpoena, but in any event prior to the return date thereof, file with the law judge who issued the subpoena a motion to quash or modify the subpoena, and such filing shall stay the effectiveness of the subpoena pending final action by the law judge on the motion.
( b ) *Witness fees.* Witnesses shall be entitled to the same fees and expenses for mileage as are paid to witnesses in the courts of the United States. The fees and expenses shall be paid by the party at whose request the witness is subpoenaed or appears. The Board may decline to process a proceeding further should a party fail to compensate a witness pursuant to this paragraph.
( c ) *Board Members, officers and employees.* In order to encourage a free flow of information to the Board's accident investigators, the Board disfavors the use of its personnel in enforcement proceedings. Therefore, the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section are not applicable to Board Members, officers and employees, or the production of documents in their custody. Applications for subpoenas requiring the attendance of such persons, or the production of such documents, must be addressed to the General Counsel, and shall set forth the need of the moving party for the testimony or documents sought, and a showing that such material is not now, and was not otherwise, reasonably available from other sources. Only upon the General Counsel's written approval for the issuance of a subpoena requiring a Board Member, officer or employee to provide testimony and/or to produce documents in connection with discovery or at a hearing may a law judge issue such a subpoena. The law judge shall not permit the testimony or documentary evidence provided by a Board Member, officer or employee to include any expression of opinion, or any account of statements of a party made during the Board's investigation of any accident.
#### § 663.41 Certification of compliance with Federal motor vehicle safety standards.

If a vehicle purchased under this part is subject to the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards issued by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in part 571 of this title, a recipient shall keep on file its certification that it received, both at the pre-award and post-delivery stage, a copy of the manufacturer's self-certification information that the vehicle complies with relevant Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards.
<PAGE>

                            Verizon Maryland, Inc.

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                              Years Ended December 31,
                                                        -----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Dollars in Millions)                                            2001          2000          1999           1998          1997
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                           <C>           <C>           <C>            <C>           <C>
Income before provision for income taxes                      $ 525.7       $ 616.0       $ 628.3        $ 501.7       $ 396.0
Equity in loss (income) from affiliates                          91.8           2.5           (.5)           ---           ---
Dividends received from equity affiliate                           .4            .6            .5            ---           ---
Interest expense                                                 81.4          82.8          70.6           69.8          67.1
Portion of rent expense representing interest                    28.6          13.1          12.8           19.1          18.2
Amortization of capitalized interest                              3.0           2.6           2.1            1.8           1.5
                                                        -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings, as adjusted                                         $ 730.9       $ 717.6       $ 713.8        $ 592.4       $ 482.8
                                                        =======================================================================

Fixed charges:
Interest expense                                              $  81.4       $  82.8       $  70.6        $  69.8       $  67.1
Portion of rent expense representing interest                    28.6          13.1          12.8           19.1          18.2
Capitalized interest                                              8.7           9.1           4.3            5.6           4.0
                                                        -----------------------------------------------------------------------

Fixed Charges                                                 $ 118.7       $ 105.0       $  87.7        $  94.5       $  89.3
                                                        =======================================================================

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                               6.16          6.83          8.14           6.27          5.41
                                                        =======================================================================
</TABLE>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1253 

CA 12-00514 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF ONTARIO SQUARE REALTY CORP., 

PETITIONER-APPELLANT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ASSESSOR OF THE TOWN OF FARMINGTON, DONNA 

LAPLANT, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

 

PANZARELLA & COIA, P.C., ROCHESTER (CHAD M. HUMMEL OF COUNSEL), FOR

PETITIONER-APPELLANT. 

BOYLAN CODE LLP, ROCHESTER (SHEILA M. CHALIFOUX OF COUNSEL), FOR

RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Ontario County

(Kenneth R. Fisher, J.), entered January 26, 2011 in a proceeding

pursuant to RPTL article 7. The order granted the motion of

respondent to dismiss the petition.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this RPTL article 7 proceeding

seeking review of the real property tax assessment of its property.

Supreme Court properly granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the

petition on the ground that petitioner failed to serve the notice of

petition and petition within the applicable time period provided in

CPLR 306-b. In opposing the motion, petitioner’s attorney submitted

an affirmation seeking an extension of time for service in the

interest of justice. Contrary to petitioner’s contention, it “was

required to serve a notice of cross motion in order to obtain the

affirmative relief of an extension of time to serve the [petition with

a notice of petition or an order to show cause] upon [respondent]

pursuant to CPLR 306-b” (Lee v Colley Group McMontebello, LLC, 90 AD3d

1000, 1000-1001; see DeLorenzo v Gabbino Pizza Corp., 83 AD3d 992,

993). In any event, the court properly considered all of the relevant

factors in determining whether to extend the time for service in the

interest of justice (see CPLR 306-b; Leader v Maroney, Ponzini &

Spencer, 97 NY2d 95, 105-106; Brown v Wilson Farms, Inc., 52 AD3d

1324, 1324-1325), and the court properly denied petitioner’s request

for that relief (see Eggleston v A.C. & S., Inc., 17 AD3d 1167, 1167-

1168). 

Entered: November 9, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

     I,  Claude  Couty,  certify  that:

     1.  I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form 10-QSB of Heritage
Worldwide,  Inc.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were  made,  not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

     3.  Based  on  my  knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information  included  in  this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for  the  registrant  and  have:

          a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls and procedures to ensure that
     material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries,  is  made  know  to  us  by  others  within  those  entities,
     particularly  during  the  period  in  which this quarterly report is being
     prepared;

          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
     and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about
     the  effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
     of  the  period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  our  evaluation.

          c)  Disclosed  in  this  quarterly  report  any change in the issuer's
     internal  control  over financial reporting that occurred during the period
     covered  by  this  quarterly  report  that  has  materially affected, or is
     reasonably  likely  to materially affect, the registrant's internal control
     over  financial  reporting;  and

     5.  The  registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on  our  most  recent  evaluation,  to  the  registrant's auditors and the audit
committee  of  registrant's  board  of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the
equivalent  functions):

          a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls  which  are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
     ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

          b)  Any  fraud,  whether  or not material, that involves management or
     other  employees  who  have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls  over  financial  reporting


     Date:  May  28,  2004                           /s/ Claude  Couty
                                                     ------------------
                                                     Claude  Couty
                                                     Principal Financial Officer


                                       80
<PAGE>
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Business and Economy    >Quarterly Services    >Data
 Skip to looking for section Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  Quarterly Services Survey Data
  News
 Check out our latest blog post, Economic Impacts of "Safer-at-Home" Visible from Census' Quarterly Services Survey
  Latest Quarterly Services Report
  Quarterly Services Report: 4th Quarter 2023
 Quarterly Services Report: 4th Quarter 2023
 Quarterly Services Report: 4th Quarter 2023 - All Tables
  Historical Quarterly Services Reports
  Historical Quarterly Services Reports in PDF and Excel Formats
  Historical Advance Quarterly Services Reports
  Historical Advance Quarterly Services Reports in PDF and Excel Formats
  Historical Annual Benchmark Datasets for Services
  CSV Historical Annual Benchmark Datasets for Services with corresponding documentation
 Last Revised: March 13, 2024


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
(Exhibit 10.37)


HENRY SCHIFFER, CPA
AN ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION
315 S. Beverly Drive, Suite 211
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
Telephone (310) 826-6830
Facsimile: (310) 286-6840


March 24, 2004

United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549

Re:     Xynergy Corporation

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The undersigned Henry Schiffer, CPA An Accountancy Corporation previously acted
as independent accountants to audit the financial statements of Xynergy
Corporation. We are no longer acting as independent accountants to the Company.

This letter will confirm that we have reviewed Item 4 of the Company's Form 8-K,
dated May 1, 2003 captioned "Changes in Registrant's Certifying Accountant" and
that we agree with the statements made therein as they relate to us.

We hereby consent to the filing of this letter as an exhibit to the foregoing
report on Form 8-K.


                                     Page 3

<PAGE>


Sincerely,

/s/

Henry Schiffer, CPA

HS/kpe
SHARON F. WARD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-4634

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 6, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Ross Goodman, Judge.

Sharon F. Ward, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, RAY, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
From: David Walter [mailto:dave24w3@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2015 1:18 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: "RIN 1210-AB32"

Dear Mr. Thomas Perez,

I have been an investment advisor for 36 years, and have always put "my clients first". I have 

found by doing so, my referrals over the years, has been huge.

Too often, I have reviewed clients portfolios who are paying the ( fiduciary ) fee every quarter, 

and not one thing in their portfolio changes for years. Many advisors now cheer the advocacy of 

being a fiduciary, so their clients will pay them an ongoing fee.

Too often, I have also seen so-called " fee-only" advisors double dipping- charging their clients 

the fiduciary fee and being paid from the investments they recommend.

The most amazing statistic I can share with you is the number of prospective clients, who come 

in the office asking for "fee-only" and are totally surprised when told the fee is assessed monthly, 

or quarterly ever year. You cannot believe how many think the "fee-only" is a one-time charge.

Everyone is certainly entitled to make a living, better education should be the first priority as to 

the various types of fees associated with investing.As a member of AARP, and a recipient of 

their monthly magazine, it is filled with AARP ads selling their own lifetime income immediate 

annuity or a medigap policy, or health insurance or car insurance- I'd be willing to bet, they're 

not free, and don't carry with them, the assurance of putting "my interest first".

The auto sales industry, life insurance sales industry, members of Congress (who vote for their 

PAC interests, )banking industry, mortgage industry-do not necessarily put "my interest first 

either". I repeat,educating the consumer is the top priority.

I welcome any response from you.

Dave Walter

410-730-0939

educating the consumer is the top priority.