alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Mack McLeod [mailto:mclwan@bellsouth.net] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 1:17 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

Dear sir or madam:

 

I am writing to vehemently protest the idea of annuitizing private retirement plans. The recent 

vote by the SEC to legalize the suspension of Money Market redemptions clearly outlines the 

direction of policy of this administration's financial plans. That is, to make it ever more difficult for 

private individuals to access the proceeds of their retirement plans. This suspension of MMkt 

redemptions is the first step. (1): Throw obstructions into the path of taking money out of privately 

held assets.

 

The idea of annuitizing private retirement plans is the next step. The effect of this requirement 

would freeze the retirement assets of the nation's privately held retirement assets and put these 

assets under the control of the United States Treasury. This idea is totally laughable. The idea of 

making MY retirement "safer" by annuitizing my 401K and IRA utilizing long term US Treasury 

bills will only lock in low rates used to compute the annuity payment and guarantee that the 

growth rate of my assets will not be able to keep up with inflation and taxes which MUST rise in 

the future because of the current irresponsible and unsustainable deficit spending going on. Not 

my analysis - check with the Congressional Budget Office.

 

MY PUBLIC COMMENT TO THIS IDEA IS NO NO NO NO NO NO! KEEP YOUR HANDS OFF 

OUR PRIVATELY HELD ASSETS!!!!

 

Wallace N. McLeod, Jr., MD

3234 Skinner Mill Road

Augusta, GA 30909
###### Editorial Note on Part 572

#### Editorial Notes:

1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 572.82 Head.

The head consists of the assembly shown in drawing LP 1049/A and conforms to each of the applicable drawings listed under LP 1049/0 through 54.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Business and Economy    >Retail - Monthly    >FAQs    >Advance Monthly Retail FAQs    >General FAQs
 Skip to looking for section Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  Advance Monthly Retail Trade Survey - General FAQs  Who uses the statistics produced from data collected in the Advance Monthly Sales for Retail and Food Services (MARTS)? The Bureau of Economic Analysis uses these data for the nation's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) estimates and in developing the national accounts' input-output tables.
	The Bureau of Labor Statistics uses these data as input to its Producer Price Indices and in developing productivity measurements.
	Trade and professional organizations use these data to analyze industry trends and benchmark their own statistical programs, develop forecasts, and evaluate regulatory requirements.
	The media use these data for news reports and background information.
	Private businesses use these data to measure market share, analyze business potential, and plan investments. What are economic indicators?   What kinds of businesses are included in the Advance Monthly Sales for Retail and Food Services (MARTS)? 
  Are the statistics produced from the Advance Monthly Sales for Retail and Food Services (MARTS) available at the state or other sub-national level? Economic Census County Business Patterns
  Why is the Advance Monthly Sales for Retail and Food Services (MARTS) conducted?   What is The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)? NAICS
  Are sales taxes included in published sales estimates?   If a firm sells to both household consumers and businesses from the same location, are sales to businesses excluded?   What is sampling variability and how do I interpret it? 
  What steps does the Census Bureau undertake to ensure the confidentiality of the respondents' data? Title 13
  How are gift certificates/cards treated?   What types of transactions are considered e-commerce sales, when collected as part of the Advance Monthly Sales for Retail and Food Services (MARTS)?   Are e-commerce sales included in current monthly retail sales estimates?   Where are e-commerce sales tabulated for traditional brick-and-mortar retailers?


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### § 601.21 Definitions.

Act means statutes granting the Secretary authority to regulate public transportation.

*Administrator* means the Federal Transit Administrator, the Deputy Administrator or the delegate of either of them.
From: Joan Cox [mailto:joancee_99@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2015 8:04 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

This proposed rule exemplifies typical government over-reach and should be 

scrapped!!!

Joan Cox

Wilmington, DEl
§ 633.19 Exclusion from the project management oversight program. The Administrator may, in compelling circumstances, determine that a project meeting the criteria of § 633.5(e)(1) is not a major capital project because project management oversight under this part will not benefit the Federal government or the recipient. Typically, this means a project that: ( a ) Involves a recipient whose past record indicates the appropriateness of excluding the project from project management oversight under this part; and
( b ) Involves such a greater level of financial risk to the recipient than to the Federal government that project management oversight under this part is made less necessary to secure the recipient's diligence.
H. Res. 366

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 14, 2002.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2146) to amend title 18 of the United States

Code to provide life imprisonment for repeat offenders who

commit sex offenses against children. The first reading of the

bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member

of the Committee on the Judiciary. After general debate the

bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute

rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for

the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the

amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the

Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be con-
2

•HRES 366 EH

sidered as read. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the

portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall

be considered as read. At the conclusion of consideration of

the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have

been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in

the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of

the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the

nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final

passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 543.6 Petition: Specific content requirements. ( a ) Each petition for exemption filed under this part must include: ( 1 ) A statement that an antitheft device will be installed as standard equipment on all vehicles in the line for which an exemption is sought;
( 2 ) A list naming each component in the antitheft system, and a diagram showing the location of each of those components within the vehicle;
( 3 ) A discussion that explains the means and process by which the device is activated and functions, including any aspect of the device designed to— ( i ) Facilitate or encourage its activation by motorists,
( ii ) Attract attention to the efforts of an unauthorized person to enter or move a vehicle by means other than a key,
( iii ) Prevent defeating or circumventing the device by an unauthorized person attempting to enter a vehicle by means other than a key,
( iv ) Prevent the operation of a vehicle which an unauthorized person has entered using means other than a key, and
( v ) Ensure the reliability and durability of the device;
( 4 ) The reasons for the petitioner's belief that the antitheft device will be effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft, including any theft data and other data that are available to the petitioner and form a basis for that belief;
( 5 ) The reasons for the petitioner's belief that the agency should determine that the antitheft device is likely to be as effective as compliance with the parts-marking requirements of part 541 in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft, including any statistical data that are available to the petitioner and form a basis for petitioner's belief that a line of passenger motor vehicles equipped with the antitheft device is likely to have a theft rate equal to or less than that of passenger motor vehicles of the same, or a similar, line which have parts marked in compliance with part 541.
( b ) Any petitioner submitting data under paragraph (a) (4) or (5) of this section shall submit an explanation of its belief that the data are sufficiently representative and reliable to warrant NHTSA's reliance upon them.
[52 FR 33829, Sept. 8, 1987, as amended at 59 FR 10758, Mar. 8, 1994]
 

 

 

 

 

 

                     4 

 

 

 

 

 

 


§ 6.5 Proceedings covered. ( a ) The Act applies to adversarial adjudications conducted by the Department of Transportation. These are adjudications under 5 U.S.C. 554 in which the position of the Department is represented by an attorney or other representative who enters an appearance and participates in the proceeding. Coverage of the Act begins at designation of a proceeding or issuance of a charge sheet. Any proceeding in which the Department may prescribe or establish a lawful present or future rate is not covered by the Act. Proceedings to grant or renew licenses are also excluded, but proceedings to modify, suspend, or revoke licenses are covered if they are otherwise “adversary adjudications.” For the Department of Transportation, the types of proceedings covered include, but may not be limited to: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) automotive fuel economy enforcement under 49 CFR part 511; Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) enforcement of motor carrier safety regulations under 49 CFR 386; and the Department's aviation economic enforcement proceedings conducted by its Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings pursuant to 14 CFR Chapter II. Also covered is any hearing conducted under Chapter 38 of title 31 of the U.S. Code or the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. 2000bb *et seq.*).
( b ) If a proceeding includes both matters covered by the Act and matters specifically excluded from coverage, any award made will include only fees and expenses related to covered issues.
[48 FR 1070, Jan. 10, 1983, as amended at 62 FR 19233, Apr. 21, 1997; 81 FR 71385, Oct. 17, 2016]
Exhibit 24.3



POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, Bruce DeMars, do hereby appoint John W. Rowe and Randall E. Mehrberg, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and
on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2003 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all
things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.



/s/    BRUCE DEMARSBruce DeMars




DATE: February 16, 2004
§ 611.307 Overall Small Starts project ratings. ( a ) The summary ratings developed for project justification and local financial commitment (§§ 611.303(f) and 611.305(i)) will form the basis for the overall rating for each project.
( b ) FTA will assign overall project ratings to each proposed project of “high,” “medium-high, “medium,” ”medium-low,” or “low,” as required by 49 U.S.C. 5309(e)(8). ( 1 ) These ratings will indicate the overall merit of a proposed Small Starts project at the time of evaluation.
( 2 ) Ratings for individual projects will be developed prior to an EGA.
( c ) These ratings will be used to: ( 1 ) Approve or deny projects for EGAs; and
( 2 ) Support annual funding recommendations to Congress in the *Annual Report on Funding Recommendations* required by 49 U.S.C. 5309(k)(1).
( d ) FTA will assign overall ratings for proposed Small Starts projects by averaging the summary ratings for project justification and local financial commitment. When the average of these ratings is unclear (e.g., summary project justification rating of “medium-high” and summary local financial commitment rating of “medium”), FTA will round up the overall rating to the higher rating except in the following circumstances: ( 1 ) A “medium” overall rating requires a rating of at least “medium” on both project justification and local financial commitment.
( 2 ) If a project receives a “low” rating on either project justification or local financial commitment, the overall rating will be “low.”
Exhibit 32

Written Statement of
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of WidePoint
Corporation (the Company), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 ( the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ STEVE L. KOMAR  Steve L.
KomarChief Executive Officer

/s/ JAMES T. MCCUBBIN  James T.
McCubbinChief Financial Officer

Date: May 20, 2008
§ 661.13 Grantee responsibility. ( a ) The grantee shall adhere to the Buy America clause set forth in its grant contract with FTA.
( b ) The grantee shall include in its bid or request for proposal (RFP) specification for procurement within the scope of this part an appropriate notice of the Buy America provision. Such specifications shall require, as a condition of responsiveness, that the bidder or offeror submit with the bid or offer a completed Buy America certificate in accordance with §§ 661.6 or 661.12 of this part, as appropriate. ( 1 ) A bidder or offeror who has submitted an incomplete Buy America certificate or an incorrect certificate of noncompliance through inadvertent or clerical error (but not including failure to sign the certificate, submission of certificates of both compliance and non-compliance, or failure to submit any certification), may submit to the FTA Chief Counsel within ten (10) days of bid opening of submission or a final offer, a written explanation of the circumstances surrounding the submission of the incomplete or incorrect certification in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1746, sworn under penalty of perjury, stating that the submission resulted from inadvertent or clerical error. The bidder or offeror will also submit evidence of intent, such as information about the origin of the product, invoices, or other working documents. The bidder or offeror will simultaneously send a copy of this information to the FTA grantee. ( i ) The FTA Chief Counsel may request additional information from the bidder or offeror, if necessary. The grantee may not make a contract award until the FTA Chief Counsel issues his/her determination, except as provided in § 661.15(m).
( ii ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) For negotiated procurements, compliance with the Buy America requirements shall be determined on the basis of the certification submitted with the final offer or final revised proposal. However, where a grantee awards on the basis of initial proposals without discussion, the certification submitted with the initial proposal shall control.
( 3 ) Certification based on ignorance of the proper application of the Buy America requirements is not an inadvertent or clerical error.
( c ) Whether or not a bidder or offeror certifies that it will comply with the applicable requirement, such bidder or offeror is bound by its original certification (in the case of a sealed bidding procurement) or its certification submitted with its final offer (in the case of a negotiated procurement) and is not permitted to change its certification after bid opening or submission of a final offer. Where a bidder or offeror certifies that it will comply with the applicable Buy America requirements, the bidder, offeror, or grantee is not eligible for a waiver of those requirements.
[56 FR 932, Jan. 9, 1991, as amended at 68 FR 9799, Feb. 28, 2003; 71 FR 14117, Mar. 21, 2006]
§ 356.5 Traversal authority. ( a ) *Scope.* An irregular route motor carrier may operate between authorized service points over any reasonably direct or logical route unless expressly prohibited.
( b ) *Requirements.* Before commencing operations, the carrier must, regarding each State traversed: ( 1 ) Notify the State regulatory body in writing, attaching a copy of its operating rights;
( 2 ) Designate a process agent; and
( 3 ) Comply with 49 CFR 387.315.
#### § 588.3 Applicability.

This part applies to manufacturers of child restraint systems, except factory-installed built-in restraints.
Order filed, February 7, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-20-00120-CV

____________

LANDMARK INTEREST CORPORATION, Appellant

V.

COMPETENCE ELECTRIC, LLC, STEVEN SOLIZ, INDIVIDUALLY, 

AND CRAWFORD ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 239th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 90877-CV

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due July 8, 2019. See Tex. R. App. P. 

35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The 

record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not 

been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Ida Salinas, the court reporter, to file the record in this appeal 

within 15 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain and Hassan.
1210-AB32-2-1523.html[7/26/2015 6:52:14 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwn-ebpr

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2020

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: CHRISTINE TAULBEE

Address:

2610 SEA BREEZE st.

Caldwell, ID, 83605

General Comment

What next will obama want our first born too/????

We earn our money and are taxed into oblivion and even have to pay after were dead!!!!!!!!!!!!

Lay off the american citizens and let us have the freedom to Decide for ourselves how we will spend our money.

That is if AMERICA is still a free COUNTRY!!!!!!!!!!!
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBC) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Todd D. Fanning, Senior Vice-President & Chief
Financial Officer of PNBC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of PNBC.






/s/ Todd D. FanningTodd D. Fanning
Senior Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer

November 6, 2007


---
§ 586.8 Incomplete registrations. ( a ) If NHTSA determines that a submission is incomplete, NHTSA will notify the registrant, by email, within 90 days, that there is missing information. The registrant shall have 60 days to submit the missing information. This notification will be sent to the email address provided in the manufacturer's original submission.
( b ) If NHTSA receives the missing information within 60 days of notifying the registrant that its submission is incomplete, NHTSA will approve or deny the registration within a period of time equivalent to the number of days that were remaining in the original 90-day period at the time NHTSA sent the notification, plus an additional 30 days.
( c ) If a registrant does not respond to NHTSA's notification that its submission is incomplete within 60 days, or the registrant responds within 60 days but the additional information submitted is not sufficient to complete the registration, the registration may be denied.
Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBC) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I Todd D. Fanning, Vice-President & Chief Financial
Officer of PNBC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of PNBC.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

22

---