alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1


























Certification
of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350


(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, of Britton & Koontz
Capital Corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), I, W. Page Ogden, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:







(1)
            the
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.




















Date: May
7,
2009                                                                /s/ W. Page Ogden


W. Page Ogden


Chief Executive
Officer
#### §§ 655.36-655.40 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 31.1


CERTIFICATION

I, Bernard Korn, Chief Executive Officer of Colonial Commercial Corp., certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Colonial Commercial Corp.
(the "Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures, to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this Annual Report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this Annual Report any change in the Registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's fourth
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: November 14, 2003

                                        /S/ BERNARD KORN
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Bernard Korn
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        Chairman of the Board and President



<PAGE>
Exhibit 32

Written Statement of
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of WidePoint
Corporation (the Company), hereby certify, based on their knowledge, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (
the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ STEVE L. KOMAR Steve
L. KomarChief Executive Officer

/s/ JAMES T. MCCUBBIN
James T. McCubbinChief Financial Officer

Date:  May 17, 2004
#### §§ 807.131-807.139 [Reserved]
OST-2010-004 6

USDO T Secretary Dea r Sir : Kee p Merce r

count y i nMounta . 

### n AiMi '

wil l hav e miser y i nCentra l tim e i nTime , I t I S ou r

choic e fo r

ou r lives . W e
Rura l Residen t Merce r Count y
Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc.
(PNBC) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I Todd D. Fanning, Senior Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer of PNBC, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of PNBC.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|/s/   Todd D. Fanning                                         
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|Todd D. FanningSenior Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer

November 8, 2005



---
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER REQUIRED BY
RULE 13A-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Quality Systems, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: February 1, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Paul HoltPaul A. Holt,Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
#### § 79.7 Award.

If the Secretary of Transportation decides that it is warranted, the Secretary shall award the Medal on behalf of and in the name of the President of the United States.
§ 29.923 What is the effect of a pending appeal? ( a ) The Tribe must continue performance in accordance with the compact and funding agreement during the appeal of any claims to the same extent the Tribe would have performed had there been no dispute.
( b ) A pending dispute will not affect or prevent the negotiation or award of any subsequent compact or funding agreement between the Department and the Tribe.
###### Editorial Note on Part 193

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 193 appear at 71 FR 33408, June 9, 2006.

#### § 193.2167 Covered systems.

A covered impounding system is prohibited except for concrete wall designed tanks where the concrete wall is an outer wall serving as a dike.

[Amdt. 193-17, 65 FR 10959, Mar. 1, 2000]
#### § 551.66 What is the legal effect of service of process on an agent?

Service on an agent of administrative or judicial notices or process is deemed to be service on a manufacturer.
###### Editorial Note on Part 571

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 571 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 571.107 [Reserved]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAcoustic and aerodynamic study of a pusher-propeller aircraft modelAn aerodynamic and acoustic study was made of a pusher-propeller aircraft model in the NASA-Ames 7 x 10 ft Wind Tunnel. The test section was changed to operate as an open jet. The 591 mm diameter unswept propeller was operated alone and in the wake of three empennages: an I tail, Y tail, and a V tail. The radiated noise and detailed wake properties were measured. Results indicate that the unsteady blade loading caused by the blade interactions with the wake mean velocity distribution had a strong effect on the harmonics of blade passage noise. The blade passage harmonics above the first were substantially increased in all horizontal directions by the empennage/propeller interaction. Directivity in the plane of the propeller was maximum perpendicular to the blade surface. Increasing the tail loading caused the propeller harmonics to increase 3 to 5 dB for an empennage/propeller spacing of 0.38 mean empennage chords. The interaction noise became weak as empennage propeller spacing was increased beyond 1.0 mean empennage chord lengths. Unlike the mean wake deficit, the wake turbulence had only a small effect on the propeller noise, that effect being a small increase in the broadband noise.Document ID19910012515Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsSoderman, Paul T.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Horne, W. Clifton*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1990Subject CategoryAcousticsReport/Patent NumberA-89038NASA-TP-3040NAS 1.60:3040Accession Number91N21828Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-61-11Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910012515.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
299 P.2d 1105

#### STATE of Idaho, ex rel. Ronald D. SPANTON, Petitioner, v. L. E. CLAPP, Chairman for the Idaho State Board of Correction, Idaho State Penitentiary, Boise, Idaho, Defendant.

No. 8470.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

July 20, 1956.

*240Ronald.D. Spanton, pro se.

Graydon W. Smith, Atty. Gen., Edward J. Aschenhrener, T. J. Jones, III, Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondent.

TAYLOR, Chief Justice.

Petitioner filed original application with this court for writ of habeas corpus June .11, 1956. Writ issued June 13, 1956. The defendant filed a motion to quash and a return, to which petitioner answered. By these pleadings- it is shown that petitioner had previously made application to the *241district court of the Third Judicial District for writ of habeas corpus, upon the same ground upon which writ was issued herein; writ was issued by the district court and a hearing had upon the return thereto; petitioner appealed from the order of the district court quashing the writ and remanding petitioner to defendant. 78 Idaho 234, 299 P.2d 1103. Under such circumstances the writ was inadvertently issued by this court.

It is, therefore, ordered that the writ be quashed, and the proceedings dismissed.

KEETON, PORTER, ANDERSON and SMITH, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32

Written Statement of
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350

Solely for the purposes of complying
with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of WidePoint
Corporation (the Company), hereby certify, based on their knowledge, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (
the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ STEVE L. KOMARSteve L. KomarChief Executive
Officer

/s/ JAMES T. MCCUBBINJames T. McCubbinChief
Financial Officer

Date: November 21, 2005
```

[House Report 105-488]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

105th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

 2d Session                                                     105-488
_______________________________________________________________________

 
   PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.J. RES. 111, TAX LIMITATION 
                        CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT

                                _______
                                

   April 21, 1998.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

Mr. Pryce of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 407]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 407, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

               brief summary of provisions of resolution

    The resolution provides for the consideration of H.J. Res. 
111, the ``Tax Limitation Constitutional Amendment'' under a 
modified closed rule. The rule provides three hours of debate 
divided equally between the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on the Judiciary.
    The rule provides for consideration in the House. It 
provides that the amendment specified in this report will be 
considered as adopted.
    It provides one motion to amend if offered by the Minority 
Leader or his designee, which will be considered as read, and 
which will be debatable for one hour equally divided between 
the proponent and an opponent.
    Finally, the rule provides for one motion to recommit, with 
or without instructions.

         the amendment considered as adopted by the resolution

    In the article proposed to be added to the Constitution of 
the United States by the joint resolution, amend section 1 to 
read as follows:
    ``Section 1. Any bill, resolution, or other legislative 
measure changing the internal revenue laws shall require for 
final adoption in each House the concurrence of two-thirds of 
the Members of that House voting and present, unless that bill 
is determined at the time of adoption, in a reasonable manner 
prescribed by law, not to increase the internal revenue by more 
than a de minimis amount. For purposes of determining any 
increase in the internal revenue under this section, there 
shall be excluded any increase resulting from the lowering of 
an effective rate of any tax. On any vote for which the 
concurrence of two-thirds is required under this article, the 
yeas and nays of the Members of either House shall be entered 
on the journal of that House.''

                                

```
1210-AB32-2-1054.html[7/23/2015 3:26:38 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-w7xy

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1546

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Tom Anonymous

General Comment

I want to comment on my retirement. I have spent fifty years paying taxes to the government and I have planned

 for my retirement and the less the government gets in the way the better. Seems like the government should be

 helping by staying out of this.
#### B. Schlesinger Company, Respondent, *v.*I. B. Kleinert Rubber Company, Appellant.

*Schlesinger Company*v. *Kleinert Rubber Co.,*136 App. Div. 939, affirmed.

(Submitted May 12, 1911;

decided May 30, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February *4,*1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for an alleged breach of contract.

*Abraham Benedict*for appellant.

*Jesse S. Epstein*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
#### COOPER v. PRATT et al.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

February 6, 1912.)

No. 1,039.

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston.

J. W. Vandervort and W. E. R. Byrne (R. G. Linn, on the brief), for plaintiff in error.

W. E. Chilton (W. A. MacCorkle, J. E. Chilton, and T. S. Clark, on the brief), for defendants in error.

Before GOFF and PRITCHARD, Circuit Judges, and McDOWELL,.District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, with costs.
From: Andrew Schoener [mailto:andrew.schoener@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 3:55 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

To Whom It May Concern: 

I work for a large IT form named Sungard, and we have a typical 401k plan with 

company match. 

With regard to your request for information, I am deeply troubled about the proposal, 

specifically: 

13. Should some form of lifetime income distribution option be required for defined 

contribution plans (in addition to money purchase pension plans)? If so, should that 

option be the default distribution option, and should it apply to the entire account 

balance? To what extent would such a requirement encourage or discourage plan 

sponsorship? 

Lifetime income as a required option is a giant step towards central planning. If a 

lifetime income option is offered as a true option, then that would give investors (savers) 

a choice. And choices are good. But as soon as any portion of my savings are required

to be directed towards a lifetime income option is the day that I will discontinue fully my 

participation in my company's 401k. Period. 

Please be sensible and give savers more choices. Likewise, please be sensible and do 

force savers into certain instruments, as benign as you may believe the instruments to be. 

Regards, 

Andrew Schoener 

Sudbury, MA 

Citizen 

Who actually saves, 

Living below my means 

Currently being punished for Wall Street's errors
§ 625.45 Setting performance targets for capital assets. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) A provider must set one or more performance targets for each applicable performance measure.
( 2 ) A provider must set a performance target based on realistic expectations, and both the most recent data available and the financial resources from all sources that the provider reasonably expects will be available during the TAM plan horizon period.
( b ) *Timeline for target setting.* ( 1 ) Within three months after the effective date of this part, a provider must set performance targets for the following fiscal year for each asset class included in its TAM plan.
( 2 ) At least once every fiscal year after initial targets are set, a provider must set performance targets for the following fiscal year.
( c ) *Role of the accountable executive.* A provider's Accountable Executive must approve each annual performance target.
( d ) *Setting performance targets for group plan participants.* ( 1 ) A Sponsor must set one or more unified performance targets for each asset class reflected in the group TAM plan in accordance with paragraphs (a)(2) and (b) of this section.
( 2 ) To the extent practicable, a Sponsor must coordinate its unified performance targets with each participant's Accountable Executive.
( e ) *Coordination with metropolitan, statewide and non-metropolitan planning processes.* To the maximum extent practicable, a provider and Sponsor must coordinate with States and Metropolitan Planning Organizations in the selection of State and Metropolitan Planning Organization performance targets.
1210-AB32-2-1608.html[7/26/2015 8:53:21 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jxx-7xyu

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2105

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

There are enough state regulations around retirement accounts, we don't need any more federal rules or oversight

 in this matter. If you feel you need to look into financial matters, why don't you focus your energy on

 Congressional Insider Trading? I'm sure there's plenty of Insider Trading by staff and family members of

 Congress to keep you all engaged and plenty of new regulations that can be passed and taxed as well.
#### § 392.63 Towing or pushing loaded buses.

No disabled bus with passengers aboard shall be towed or pushed; nor shall any person use or permit to be used a bus with passengers aboard for the purpose of towing or pushing any disabled motor vehicle, except in such circumstances where the hazard to passengers would be increased by observance of the foregoing provisions of this section, and then only in traveling to the nearest point where the safety of the passengers is assured.

[33 FR 19732, Dec. 25, 1968, as amended at 60 FR 38747, July 28, 1995]