alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Sept. 26: Military airstrikes continue against ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published Sept. 26, 2015

September 26, 2015,Release # 20150926-01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**SOUTHWEST ASIA –** On Sept. 25, coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq. In Syria, coalition military forces conducted one airstrike using bomber aircraft. Separately in Iraq, coalition military forces conducted 24 airstrikes coordinated with and in support of the Government of Iraq using bomber, fighter, fighter-attack, and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL targets.The following is a summary of the strikes conducted against ISIL since the last press release:**Syria**• Near Al Hawl, one airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL vehicle.**Iraq**• Near Al Baghdadi, one airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL weapons cache and an ISIL mortar system.• Near Al Huwayjah, four airstrikes destroyed eight ISIL fighting positions and suppressed an ISIL mortar position.• Near Al Qaim, one airstrike had inconclusive results.• Near Albu Hayat, two airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL training facility and two ISIL fighting positions.• Near Bayji, three airstrikes struck two separate ISIL tactical units and destroyed seven ISIL buildings, an ISIL VBIED, and wounded two ISIL fighters.• Near Habbaniya, two airstrikes destroyed seven ISIL rocket rails and an ISIL excavator.• Near Mosul, five airstrikes struck two separate ISIL tactical units and destroyed two ISIL fighting positions, three ISIL staging positions, and suppressed an ISIL mortar position.• Near Ramadi, two airstrikes struck two separate ISIL tactical units and destroyed an ISIL building, an ISIL fighting position, an ISIL vehicle, and an ISIL cache.• Near Sinjar, three airstrikes struck three separate ISIL tactical units and destroyed an ISIL fighting position, an ISIL vehicle, and an ISIL bunker.• Near Tal Afar, one airstrike destroyed an ISIL armored vehicle and an ISIL observation post.Strike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely. The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria, and the wider international community.The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Iraq include Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, Netherlands, United Kingdom, and the United States. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Syria include Australia, Bahrain, Canada, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and the U.S.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-1355

YAN ZHENG, 

 Petitioner, 

 v. 

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, 

 Respondent. 

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: December 8, 2008 Decided: December 18, 2008 

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Henry Zhang, ZHANG & ASSOCIATES, P.C., New York, New York, for 

Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, M. 

Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Rebecca Hoffberg, 

OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for 

Respondent. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

 Yan Zheng, a native and citizen of China, petitions 

for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals 

affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of her applications for 

relief from removal. 

 Zheng first challenges the determination that she 

failed to establish eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal 

of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien 

“must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that 

no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear 

of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 

(1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude 

that Zheng fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary 

result. Having failed to qualify for asylum, Zheng cannot meet 

the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. Chen v. 

INS, 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999); INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca, 

480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987). Finally, we uphold the finding below 

that Zheng failed to demonstrate that it is more likely than not 

that she would be tortured if removed to China. 8 C.F.R. 

§ 1208.16(c)(2) (2008). 

 Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

2 
3 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hamptons Luxury Homes, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Roy Dalene, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. August 14, 2007 /s/ Roy Dalene____________Roy Dalene
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
From: Jeffrey Gelburd [mailto:jgelburd@murrayins.com] 

Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 1:00 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule

I am commenting on the proposed wording by the DOL on making Business Valuation Appraisers 

who appraise stock within an ESOP a plan fiduciary.

Over the last twenty years I have been involved with placing professional liability (E&O) insurance 

for Business valuation appraisers who are members of the American Society of Appraisers 

(ASA).

Appraisers have found it difficult to obtain such insurance from the standard insurance 

marketplace and often times will only find coverage from the Excess and Surplus (E&S) Lines 

insurance marketplace. The E&S insurance marketplace is usually the last resort for such 

coverage as they specialize in hard to place risks. There is usually a surplus lines tax applied to 

the premium and the policyholder is not protected by individual state guarantee funds should the 

insurer become insolvent.

The task of finding E&O insurance for this class is exacerbated when trying to cover their 

exposure of being a plan fiduciary. Currently, as in all E&O type policies, there is an ERISA 

exclusion which would exclude any claims involving breach of fiduciary duty in accordance with 

the Act. In order to properly protect the Business Valuation appraiser from ERISA claims, we 

would need to modify this ERISA exclusion to cover their fiduciary exposure in preparing 

business valuation reports. Often times insurance companies are unwilling to amend the ERISA 

exclusion thereby making it impossible to insure this exposure. Thus, if Business Valuation 

appraisers cannot get proper insurance protection for being plan fiduciaries as proposed, there 

will be many of these appraisers not providing this service to ESOP companies. This in turn will 

increase the cost of these annual appraisals thereby deterring further development of new 

ESOPs and perhaps forcing companies to terminate these plans.

Thank you and please feel free to contact me with any questions you might have. 

Jeffrey S. Gelburd, CPCU, ARM

Vice President

Murray Risk Management and Insurance

39 N. Duke Street, P.O.Box 1728

Lancaster, PA 17608-1728

Main Telephone: 717-397-9600

Direct Telephone: 717-735-7176

Fax: 717-735-6960

jgelburd@murrayins.com

http://www.murrayins.com

A Best Places to Work in PA Award-Winning Company

Employee Owned/Client Focused This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual(s) named. If 

you are not a named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this email. Please 

notify the sender immediately by email if you have received this message in error and delete said 

message from your system.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEvaluation of a technique to generate artificially thickened boundary layers in supersonic and hypersonic flowsThe feasibility of using a contoured honeycomb model to generate a thick boundary layer in high-speed, compressible flow was investigated. The contour of the honeycomb was tailored to selectively remove momentum in a minimum of streamwise distance to create an artificially thickened turbulent boundary layer. Three wind tunnel experiments were conducted to verify the concept. Results indicate that this technique is a viable concept, especially for high-speed inlet testing applications. In addition, the compactness of the honeycomb boundary layer simulator allows relatively easy integration into existing wind tunnel model hardware.Document ID19910018822Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsPorro, A. R.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH., United States)*Hingst, W. R.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH., United States)*Davis, D. O.*(Washington Univ. Seattle., United States)*Blair, A. B., Jr.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1991Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberE-5660NAS 1.60:3142NASA-TP-3142Accession Number91N28136Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-80-21Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910018822.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
----

(2004/C 88 E/0707)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0188/04

by Marco Cappato (NI) to the Commission

(29 January 2004)

Subject:   Abduction of two Ivorians

On 4 December 2003, while inside their vehicle, a grey Peugeot 405 with the registration number 2532CE01, Gbane Aboubacar and his brother Soule Ouattara were abducted by an armed commando near the Treichville cultural centre in Côte d'Ivoire.

Since then, attempts by their family in Koumassi to find them have been in vain. Searches at police stations and gendarmes' barracks in the administrative capital, Abidjan, have so far proved fruitless. Relatives of the victims and their political family, the Democratic Party of Côte d'Ivoire (PDCI-RDA), are shocked by this new episode of violence in the country.

Does the Commission have any information about this abduction that took place in mysterious circumstances?

Can the Commission intervene with the Ivorian authorities so that this kidnapping can be solved as quickly as possible?

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(26 February 2004)

The Commission is aware of the case of Mr Gbane Aboubacar and his brother Mr Soule Ouattara. Their abduction was mentioned in various newspapers, including ‘le Nouveau Réveil’ and ‘le Libéral’.

The party of which Mr Aboubacar is a member, the PDCI-RDA, undertook inquiries in police stations in the neighbourhood, and in the central jailhouse, the ‘Maison d'Arrêt et de Correction’, in Abidjan, but found no information.

The International Red Cross Committee was neither informed by the family nor by PDCI and was not aware of this case.

The ‘Ligue Ivoirienne des Droits de l'Homme’ (LIDHO) was informed of the case through newspapers. Their board discussed the issue on 26 January 2004, but decided not to make further inquiries because neither the family nor PDCI requested any help from them.

The ‘Mouvement Ivoirien des Droits Humains’ (MIDH) sought further information from members of the family, but they did not want to give any details and suggested to ask PDCI. In the meantime, the family moved to an unknown address.

The Delegation of the Commission in Côte d'Ivoire will raise this matter with the Government.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 352 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 352

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3341) to provide a short-
term enhanced safety net for Americans losing their jobs and to provide 
              our Nation's economy with a necessary boost.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 2002

 Mr. Israel submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3341) to provide a short-
term enhanced safety net for Americans losing their jobs and to provide 
              our Nation's economy with a necessary boost.

    Resolved, That immediately upon adoption of this resolution the 
Speaker shall, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House 
resolved into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the 
Union for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3341) to provide a short-term 
enhanced safety net for Americans losing their jobs and to provide our 
Nation's economy with a necessary boost. The first reading of the bill 
shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of 
the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and 
shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and 
Means. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment 
under the five-minute rule. The bill shall be considered by title 
rather than by section. Each title shall be considered as read. Before 
the consideration of any other amendment to the bill, it shall be in 
order to consider and dispose of an amendment to strike title III. Such 
amendment shall not be subject to debate. During consideration of the 
bill for further amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole 
may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member 
offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of the 
Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule 
XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. At the 
conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee 
shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may 
have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 
on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening 
motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2. If the Committee of the Whole rises and reports that it has 
come to no resolution on the bill, then on the next legislative day the 
House shall, immediately after the third daily order of business under 
clause 1 of rule XIV, resolve into the Committee of the Whole for 
further consideration of the bill.
                                 <all>
```
Hillsborough,

June, 1900.

#### Bodwell *v.*Nashua Manufacturing Co.

A servant who has full knowledge of a defect which the master has promised to repair cannot recover for injuries resulting therefrom, in the absence of evidence that such assurances induced him to continue in the employment.

Case, for personal injuries alleged to have been received by the plaintiff while a night watchman in the defendants’ mills, by reason of their neglect to provide him a safe place in which to work.

The plaintiff’s evidence tended to prove that on the night in question his way was obstructed by some planks which had been insecurely piled by carpenters during the preceding day; that he saw the planks' and walked safely over them once, but on his return caught his foot, and fell; that his view was obscured by escaping steam; and that a week before the defendants had promised to-repair the pipe from which the steam escaped, but had failed to do so. ■ There was no evidence that the plaintiff suggested that the escape of steam made his work more dangerous, or that he thought of quitting the employment unless repairs were made. A nonsuit was ordered, subject to exception.

*Henry R.*Atherton, for the plaintiff.

*George B. French*and *Burnham, Brown Warren,*for the defendants.

Peaslee, J.

If there were any dangers which contributed to the plaintiff’s injury of which he was not fully informed, they were caused by the acts of his fellow-servants. *Nash*v. *Company,*62. N. H. 406.

The promise to repair was not shown to have any connection with the plaintiff’s continuation in the employment. “No case *391. . . lias gone so far as to bold that where the servant does not complain on bis own account, and continues in bis employment with full knowledge of the risk, he can recover of the master, because the latter, when the defective condition was called to his attention by the servant, gave assurances, which did not induce the servant to remain, that the defect should be remedied.” *Lewis*v. Railroad, 153 Mass. 73, 77.

*Exception overruled.*

Young, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
October 8, 2012 

US DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION 

DOCKET MANAGEMENTS'r'STEM 

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE. SE 

WEST BLDG., GROUND FLOOR, ROOM W12-140 

WASHINGTON, DC 20590 

Re: AMT INTERIOR DESIGN, INC. EXEMPTION REQUEST. 

Sirs: 

()'1 

----,<--LI:r·- . _J 

Our company, AMT Interior Design Inc., currently conducts our CFR part 145 Drug Testing program at 

two separate locations. Certificate no. X6ZR173B in San Antonio, Texas, and Certificate no. 16DR008Y in 

Miami, Florida. We are requesting the combination of the two separate programs into a single 

contractor certificate number. 

We are a sm~H business with usually no more than 2'0 ell)J3.lo~tees,:tn. ~ safety,s~n?i~Ne p:osition at any 

glven ti'rne: 6ur; mechanics routinely,travel to. and from both locptiens ~o perform mainr.enanc::e as :" - . . ' •\'· ' \,• 

needed .. :ln order to relieve the redundancy of paperwork and testing, I am seeking relief from the 

separate regulatbry·'dhig and alcohol testing requirements of 14 CFR part 120 and request the 

combination into one contractor certificate number. 

I strongly feel that covering both operations under one testing program will in no way have an adverse 

effect on''ttie safe'ty on~ither ef our· operations as all safety.sensitive employees wil.l continue to be 

diligently monitbred arid tested •under the regulations as n~q~.Jireg 1 but ~t .the same time, cprnbining ·•,· ,'j ,-, 

.• . 1 : . . ' '' ; '. 

programs Wilt'greafly'redLite the amount: ·of dt~pliciW and 16!t<!s~,ir:Jsp,e.<;:tioJJ requirement~... . .. ' . . . ' ' ., . '·' 

.,,. i'' 

'\~ '. 
Thank you in advance for your courtesy and cooperation. 

M EJ lA, ACCOUNT .A;,ttt:.~;~lol.lliJOlll.l:.l:L ---.. ,. 

ELIZABETH SANCHEZ, DRUG PROGRAM MANAGER 

AMT Interior Design Inc. 

1050 Arion Pkwy, Ste 114 

San Antonio, Tx 78216 

210-495-2900 

CC: JON HOPKINS, INSPECTOR 

FAA DRUG ABATEMEN DIV. 

2601 MEACHAM BLVD. Rm 121 

FT. WORTH, TX 76137 

CC: FAA DRUG ABATEMENT DIVISION (AAM-800) 

800 INDEPENDENCE AVE. SW ROOM 806 

WASHINGTON, DC 20591
----

NOTICE

On 14 May 2004, in the Official Journal of the European Union C 136 A, the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — Ninth supplement to the 22nd complete edition’ and ‘Common catalogue of vegetable species - Third supplement to the 22nd complete edition’ will be published.

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/..........).This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see overleaf).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L,C,CA,CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex

----
From: Debi Burns [mailto:dburns@samuelengineering.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 11:40 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

I do not support the idea of converting private 401K accounts into government‐run “guaranteed

retirement accounts.”  

As spoken by the Budda, life is pain and suffering. Nirvana is recognizing the miracle of every

moment, even the pain. We are alive for joy and struggle.  

STOP trying to recreate Utopia. It doesn’t work! It stifles individuality and creative thinking.

STOP trying to level the playing field. STOP trying to manage the people of this country. STOP

promising false promises of security in regards to healthcare and retirement. There are NO

GUARANTEES! That is life!  

These policies are an abomination!    

Deb Burns

Electrical Engineer, P.E.

Samuel Engineering......We Provide Solutions

(o) 303.567.7603, (c) 303.803.4700
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 375 Agreed to House (ATH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 375

 Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 20, 2002

 Mr. Goss submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following Member be, and is hereby, elected to 
the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Energy and Commerce: Mr. Fletcher.
                                 <all>
```