alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 February 16, 2006

Before Hon. THOMAS E. FAIRCHILD, Circuit Judge Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge Hon. DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge No. 04-2475 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee ,
v. JOSE ROMERO-PEDROZA, Defendant-Appellant

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division No. 03 CR 188 Blanche M. Manning, Judge

.
O R D E R The district court sentenced defendant-appellant Jose Romero-Pedroza to 64 months in prison after he pled guilty to one count of being in the United States unlawfully after having been deported following a conviction of an aggravated felony that was a crime of violence, and who had a prior conviction of an aggravated felony in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(2). Romero-Pedroza had a criminal history category of four, and an offense level of 21 based on his prior criminal convictions, resulting in a guideline range of 57 to 71 months’ incarceration. UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53No. 04-2475 Page 2 At the request of the parties, we ordered a limited remand pursuant to United States v. Paladino , 401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir. 2005), for the sentencing judge to determine whether she would have imposed the same sentence had she understood that the sentencing guidelines were advisory. On January 31, 2006, the district court issued a memorandum and order advising the court that, after reviewing the written submissions of the parties as to this remand, the sentencing transcript, th e presentence report with the associated objects, and the briefing on Romero-Ped roza’s original motion for a downward departure, given the specific facts of Romero-Pedroza’s case, with over twenty arrests and twelve convictions between 1991 and 2003, several involving weapons, it would have imposed the same sentence. We invited the parties to file memoranda concerning the district court’s response but only the government did so. Sentences properly calculated under the sentencing guidelines are presumptively reasonable. United States v. Mykytiuk , 415 F.3d 606, 608 (7th Cir. 2005). By not responding, Romero-Pedroza fails to rebut that presumption, and our review does not reveal any reason why his sentence would be unreasonable. AFFIRMED.
IV

House Calendar No. 194

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 417

[Report No. 107–582]

Recognizing and honoring the career and work of Justice C. Clifton Young.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 14, 2002

Mr. GIBBONS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

JULY 16, 2002

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Recognizing and honoring the career and work of Justice

C. Clifton Young.

Whereas Justice C. Clifton Young, a native Nevadan, has

served in public office since 1950;

Whereas Justice Young was elected to the House of Representatives in 1952 where he served for 2 terms and

never missed a vote;

Whereas Justice Young served for 14 years in the Nevada

State Senate where he focused principally on land use

issues;
2

•HRES 417 RH

Whereas Justice Young has served on the Nevada Supreme

Court since 1984;

Whereas Justice Young was inducted into the Nevada State

Senate Hall of Fame in 1995;

Whereas in addition to his service in elected office, Justice

Young has remained active in various community and

service organizations, including serving as President of

the National Wildlife Foundation;

Whereas Justice Young attended the University of Nevada in

Reno, and Harvard Law School;

Whereas Justice Young proudly served as an officer in the

103rd Infantry Division in France, Germany, and Austria during World War II;

Whereas Justice Young has been a loving husband to Jane

Hempfling Young for almost 50 years, and together they

have raised 5 children; and

Whereas Justice Young stands as a role model to all people

of the United States as a proud and successful public

servant: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) honors the dedication and commitment of

3 Justice C. Clifton Young to the people of Nevada

4 and the United States;

5 (2) congratulates Justice Young on his long

6 and successful career; and

7 (3) expresses its best wishes to Justice Young

8 upon his retirement from the Nevada Supreme

9 Court.

House Calendar No. 194

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 417

[Report No. 107–582]

RESOLUTION

Recognizing and honoring the career and work of

Justice C. Clifton Young.

JULY 16, 2002

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of eAutoclaims, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 17, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Larry
Colton, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of eAutoclaims, Inc.


/s/ Larry Colton
-------------------------------
Print Name:  Larry Colton
Title:  Chief Financial Officer
March 17, 2006
Afghan National Army’s EOD teams safely disarm bombs in Deleram
 By Cpl. Kenneth Jasik , Regimental Combat Team 6
  Afghan National Army Sgt. Nizamuddin Azizi, explosive ordnance disposal technician, Route Clearance Tolay, 4th Kandak, 2nd Brigade, 215th Corps, searches for an improvised explosive device in Helmand province, Afghanistan, Aug. 1, 2012 (Photo by Cpl. Kenneth Jasik)
 FORWARD OPERATING BASE DELERAM II, Afghanistan (August 8, 2012) — The deadliest threat to forces operating in Afghanistan is improvised explosive devices, and Afghan National Army soldiers operating in Deleram District have been able to minimize the damage they cause with their explosive ordnance disposal teams. The ANA’s 2nd Brigade, 215th Corps, based in Deleram includes several explosive ordnance disposal teams. Those teams have successfully disarmed more than 30 IEDs in the past month, which is something they can be proud of, said Gunnery Sgt. Mario L. Virgen, Regimental Combat Team 6, 4th Kandak advisor team staff noncommissioned officer in charge.The EOD technicians with Route Clearance Tolay, 4th Kandak, act as a quick-reaction force whenever an IED is found.“Whenever someone reports an IED, it’s my job to go out there and disarm it,” said Sgt. Nizamuddin Azizi, an ANA EOD technician. “I do it to prevent the casualties of my friends in the ANA and civilian causalities. I do it for the safety of all people of Afghanistan.”The Afghan EOD technicians are extensively trained in their craft. Their Marine advisors’ role has shifted from mentoring and training to occasionally going on missions with them to observe their progress.Now that most coalition forces have left the area, the Afghan National Army has been operating almost independently in Deleram District and parts of Nimruz province. The only Marine presence is the ANA advisors. The advisors said they are very confident in the ANA’s ordnance disposal skills. The ANA’s technicians had to get numerous certifications before they were able to carry out operations independently.“The EOD school they go to is equally as long as the American EOD school,” said Virgen, from Saltland, Calif. “From there, they come back certified as EOD techs. Coalition EOD then validates these guys to ensure they have all the tools they need and retained their knowledge. Once that’s complete, they go out and operate independently.”The ANA’s Marine advisors said they know their role us important and are glad to mentor the EOD technicians as they master their craft.“It’s history in the making, and it feels good to be part of it,” said Virgen. Neutralizing IEDs make the Afghans proud, because they know that every explosive device planted in the ground has the potential to hurt or kill someone unlucky enough to get too close, said Azizi.“I feel really good about it,” said Azizi, 22. “If we do not defuse the IEDs, the IED will take the lives of either civilians or military, so that’s why I’m happy with defusing the IEDs.”
0It)-eEMAINTENANCEREVIEWBOARDREPORTTEMPORA·RYREVISIONNo.15-4IQ:HOLDERSOFPUBLICATIONNo.MRB-145/1150-"MAINTENANCEREVIEWBOARDREPORT",APPLICABLETOEMB-145/135AIRCRAFT.REASON:ThisTemporaryRevisionaddressestheresultsoftheDamageToleranceAnalysisreassessmentforSkinPanelofWindshieldPillar.FILINGINSTRUCTIONS:Insertthis,facingonpageA2-94.OnpageA2-94:•ADDEDnewtasks53-12-00-250-802-AOO,53-12-00-250-802-A01and53-12-00-250-803-AOOintheparagraphA2.3.4.AIRWORTHINESSLIMITATIONREQUIREMENTS(AU),asdescribedbelow:REFERENCENUMBER53-12-00-210-802-AOO53-12-00-250-802-AOOMRB-145/115026/Aug/13TYPEGVISDEDESCRIPTIONInternallyinspecttheFUSELAGEcomponents:•Windshieldlateralpostanditsattachment(SSI53-10-20)NOTE:ApplicabletoaircraftPost-Mod.SB145-53-0079.ExternallyinspecttheFUSELAGEcomponentsusingEddyCurrentmethod:•Windshieldlateralpostanditsattachment(SSI53-10-20)NOTE:ApplicabletoaircraftPre-Mod.SB145-53-0079.T,,,,._...,,,...,...c,/NT(FlightCycles)22,06022,060FC11,59011,590FC----ZONE223223EFFECTIVITYALLALLTR-15-41-20It):eEREFERENCENUMBER53-12-00-250-802-A0153-12-00-250-803-AOOMRB-145/115026/Aug/13TYPESDESDEDESCRIPTIONExternallyinspecttheFUSELAGEcomponentsusingEddyCurrentmethod:•Windshieldlateralpostanditsattachment(SSI53-10-20)NOTE:ApplicabletoaircraftPost-Mod.SB145-53-0079.InternallyinspecttheFUSELAGEcomponentsusingEddyCurrentmethod:•Windshieldlateralpostanditsattachment(SSI53-10-20)NOTE:ApplicabletoaircraftPre-Mod.SB145-53-0079.MAINTENANCEREVIEWBOARDREPORTI'"',_.,,,.,_,_/NT(FlightCycles)22,06022,060FC11,59011,590FC....-------------ZONE223223EFFECTIVITYALLALLTR-15-42-2
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.393 How long does a PIE stay in effect? ( a ) In the NOPE (see § 40.375(b)(5)), the initiating official proposes the duration of the PIE. The duration of the PIE is one of the elements of the proceeding that the service agent may contest (see § 40.381(b)) and about which the Director makes a decision (see § 40.387(b)(4)).
( b ) In deciding upon the duration of the PIE, the Director considers the seriousness of the conduct on which the PIE is based and the continued need to protect employers and employees from the service agent's noncompliance. The Director considers factors such as those listed in § 40.389 in making this decision.
( c ) The duration of a PIE will be between one and five years, unless the Director reduces its duration under § 40.407.
H. Res. 314

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

December 13, 2001.

Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on the

legislative day of Wednesday, December 19, 2001, for the

Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the

rules, provided that the object of any such motion is announced from the floor at least one hour before the motion

is offered. The Speaker or his designee shall consult with the

Minority Leader or his designee on the designation of any

matter for consideration pursuant to this resolution.

Attest:

Clerk.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Business and Economy    >Retail - Monthly    >Get Forms    >Monthly Retail Trade Survey Forms
 Skip to looking for section Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  Monthly Retail Trade Survey - Forms and Letters
  Current Forms and Reporting Correspondence
  SM-4417B-A Form
 SM-4417B-E Form
 SM-4417BE-A Form
 SM-4417BE-E Form
 SM-4417BS-A Form
 SM-4417BS-E Form
 SM-4417S-A Form
 SM-4417S-E Form
 SM-4417SE-A Form
 SM-4417SE-E Form
 SM-4417SS-A Form
 SM-4417SS-E Form
 SM-7217S-A Form
 SM-7217S-E Form
 SM-2017I-A Form
 SM-2017I-E Form
 Initial Mailing Letter
 Online Reporting Flyer
  Historical Forms - 2012
  SM-4412S Form
 SM-4412SE Form
 SM-4412SS Form
 SM-7212S Form
 SM-4512S Form
 SM-4512SE Form
 SM-4512SS Form
 SM-4412B Form
 SM-4412BE Form
 SM-4412BS Form
 SM-4512B Form
 SM-4512BE Form
 SM-4512BS Form
 SM-2012I Form
  Historical Forms - 2006
  SM-4406S Form
 SM-4406SE Form
 SM-4406SS Form
 SM-7206S Form
 SM-4506S Form
 SM-4506SE Form
 SM-4506SS Form
 SM-4406B Form
 SM-4406BE Form
 SM-4406BS Form
 SM-4506B Form
 SM-4506BE Form
 SM-4506BS Form
 SM-2006I Form
 Last Revised: June 23, 2020


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
§ 585.126 Reporting requirements. ( a ) *Phase-in reporting requirements.* Within 60 days after the end of each of the production years ending April 30, 2017 and April 30, 2018, each manufacturer shall submit a report to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration concerning its compliance with the rear visibility requirements in paragraphs S5.5 and S6.2 of Standard No. 111 (49 CFR 571.111) for its vehicles produced in that year. Each report shall provide the information specified in paragraph (b) of this section and in § 585.2 of this part.
( b ) *Phase-in report content* — ( 1 ) *Basis for phase-in production goals.* Each manufacturer shall provide the number of vehicles manufactured in the current production year, or, at the manufacturer's option, in each of the three previous production years. A new manufacturer that is, for the first time, manufacturing vehicles for sale in the United States must report the number of vehicles manufactured during the current production year.
( 2 ) *Production of complying vehicles.* Each manufacturer shall report, for the production year being reported on, information on the number of vehicles that meet the rear visibility requirements in paragraphs S5.5 and S6.2 of Standard No. 111 (49 CFR 571.111).
From: sgray3@metlife.com [mailto:sgray3@metlife.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 9:07 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Fiduciary

I think your proposal on who is and who is not a fiduciary is too ambiguous. You need to 

develop a rule where every plan has two fiduciaries that are acting in the best interest of 

the participants. These two fiduciaries should be reported annually on the 5500 report. 

Then there is no ambiguity. One fiduciary is from the plan sponsor, and the other 

fiduciary is the investment advisor. I know of at least one plan that does not have an 

investment advisor. I think that should not be allowed under ERISA compliant plans. 

Separately, I would like DOL to publish rules on what is expected of fiduciaries acting in 

the best interest of the plan participants. I see plans where there are conflicts of interest to 

the detriment of plan participants. 

Please call me to discuss further. 

Stuart F. Gray 

Financial Services Representative 

Registered Representative 

Investment Advisor Representative 

MetLife-L56 Gateway Capitol Financial 

3700 O’Donnell Street, Suite 200 

Baltimore, Maryland 21224 

Phone: (443) 957-6153 

Cell: (443) 955-9444 

Please do not leave any securities trade requests by e-mail as orders cannot be honored in 

this manner. 

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (MLIC), New York, NY 10166. 

Securities offered by MetLife Securities, Inc. (MSI) (FINRA/SIPC). 

MLIC and MSI are MetLife Companies. 

If you do not wish to receive commercial emails from MetLife or its affiliates in the 

future, send an email back to me at the address above. You may also contact us in writing 

at MetLife Customer Privacy Center, P. O. Box 489, Warwick, Rhode Island 02887-

9954. Please allow up to 10 days for us to process your opt-out. You may receive emails 

from us during that time, for which we apologize. If you are eligible for benefits through 

an employer that offers benefits provided by a MetLife company, this opt-out will not 

apply to emails relating to those benefits. 
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is 

for the intended addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination 

of the information, or copying of this message is prohibited. If you 

are not the intended addressee, please notify the sender immediately 

and delete this message.
EXHIBIT 32.1   CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hamptons Luxury Homes, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Roy Dalene, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  August 17, 2006 /s/ Roy Dalene Roy Dalene Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
From: Debord, Rich [mailto:radebord@marathonoil.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 2:03 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Comments on RIN 1210-AB33

Department of Labor: 

Response to proposed rule making ( RIN 1210-AB33). 

 I would prefer that the Federal government limit its plans to add additional controls to our 

retirement accounts and avoid father micromanaging of investment options available in these 

plans. I would like to express my opposition to the mandatory incorporation of annuities for 

participants and beneficiaries of retirement plans.

The typical 401k plan has grown complex enough using traditional mutual funds. Most annuities, 

as they are currently marketed by financial services companies, would incorporate all of the 

investment complexity of the conventional plan options and then add another layer of complexity 

(and higher management fees) through the insurance features they include. One of the biggest 

problems with our deferred compensation plans is their complexity (along with employees 

pathetic savings rate) keeps participation too low. I have seen no convincing evidence that 

complicated insurance products engineered either by the Federal government or the financial 

institutions will address this concern. It is most likely that these changes would make it less 

appealing for employees to participate.

Complexity adds to planning errors and mistakes. The real public policy problems is that ignorant 

, lazy, and unsophisticated investors do not participate in retirement planning and investing. 

these are the very investors that are at the greatest risk of making bad investment choices. The 

history of annuities sales practices ( particularly variable annuities) is checkered with high fees, 

along with fraud and abuse. I do not agree with the Federal governments stance that simply 

requiring the availability of annuity option would improve participants retirement security.

The unintended consequence of this requirement will allow insurance companies to push more 

complex products that generate higher profit margins for them and that are too complex for 

average investor.

Richard Debord 3814 Briarwood Dr Catlettsburg, KY 41129 606+-928-3491 radebord@windstream.net
# Ambassador, general discuss Iraq elections, Iran relations

/ Published Dec. 21, 2009

Army Gen. Ray Odierno, commander of Multi-National Force - Iraq, and U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Christopher Hill speak to the media at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, Iraq, on Dec. 19.
BAGHDAD (Dec. 19, 2009) – Iraq “is not going to be pushed around” by Iran, U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Christopher Hill said here Saturday.Hill and Gen. Ray Odierno, the commander of Multil-National Force - Iraq, spoke to reporters traveling with Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Iranians moved onto a disputed oil well in southern Iraq and placed an Iranian flag on the facility. They have since left the facility, which is clearly in Iraqi territory. “It like a game of capture the flag,” said an American spokesman in southern Iraq yesterday. “It has been going on for years.” “This is not something new, and it’s been dealt with in a good manner by the Iraqis,” Odierno said. “They contacted the Iranians and they just left.” The general said Iran and Iraq has disputed this oil well since 1975. Odierno spoke about the security portion of the agreement between Iraq and the United States that calls for all U.S. troops to leave the country at the end of 2011. “We can do security operations in Iraq through the end of 2011,” he said. “But what we’ve done is, President Obama has made the decision that we will end combat operations on 1 September 2010. The bottom line is the Iraqis are doing a very good job of security.” The number of incidents in the country is the lowest its been since 2003 and normalcy has returned for most citizens. “What’s happening though is that al-Qaida has changed from a broad-based insurgency to a covert terrorist organization that is attempting to conduct high-profile attacks to go after the legitimacy of the government of Iraq,” Odierno said. Al-Qaida wants to attack the government and disrupt the elections now set for March 7. Iranian influence in Iraq is a question. For the elections, Iran has “some ideas of how the Shias should be organized,” Hill said. “I don’t think the Iranians have prevailed in their view, I think the Iraqis will do it the way they plan to do it.” The Iraqis worked their way painfully through the Election Law, “but ultimately it was an Iraqi solution,” Hill said. Odierno said that Iran continues to train surrogates and send weapons and ammunition across the border. “It’s less that what it was, but they are still doing it,” Odierno said.
§ 89.45 Department determination. ( a ) Following review of the information, the Department notifies the debtor with a written decision that includes the supporting rationale.
( b ) If the Department either sustains or amends its determination, it shall notify the debtor that the debt is being referred to the IRS for offset against the debtor's Federal income tax refund. If the Department determines that there is no legally enforceable debt or that full payment has been made, the case will be closed.
----

(2004/C 84 E/0376)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0167/04

by Christopher Heaton-Harris (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(29 January 2004)

Subject:   Commission's accounting systems

I understand the Internal Audit Service, in a report entitled ‘IAS Review of the Commission's Accounting Framework — Final Report’ dated 15 April 2003, made a number of recommendations to the Commission regarding the accounting systems.

Has DG BUDG performed a detailed inventory of all past programmes such as ECIP and JOP? If not, will the Commission be performing such inventories, and if so when?

----