alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 585.24 Reporting requirements. ( a ) *Advanced credit phase-in reporting requirements.* Within 60 days after the end of the production year ending August 31, 2005, each manufacturer choosing to certify vehicles manufactured during that production year as complying with the Type 2 seat belt for each rear designated seating position requirements of Standard No. 208 shall submit a report to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration providing the information specified in paragraph (c) of this section and in § 585.2 of this part.
( b ) *Phase-in reporting requirements.* Within 60 days after the end of the production years ending August 31, 2006, and August 31, 2007, each manufacturer shall submit a report to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration regarding its compliance with the Type 2 seat belt for each rear designated seating position requirements of Standard No. 208 for its vehicles produced in that production year. The report shall provide the information specified in paragraph (d) of this section and in § 585.2 of this part. Each report shall also specify the number of advance credit vehicles, if any, which are being applied to the production year being reported on.
( c ) *Advanced credit phase-in report content.* With respect to the reports identified in section 585.24(a), each manufacturer shall report for the production year for which the report is filed the number of vehicles, by make and model year, that meet the applicable Type 2 seat belt for each rear designated seating position requirements of Standard No. 208.
( d ) *Phase-in report content.* ( 1 ) Basis for phase-in production requirements. For production years ending August 31, 2006, and August 31, 2007, each manufacturer shall provide the number of vehicles manufactured in the current production year, or, at the manufacturer's option, for the current production year and each of the prior two production years if the manufacturer has manufactured vehicles during each production year prior to the year for which the report is being submitted.
( 2 ) Production of complying vehicles. Each manufacturer shall report for the production year for which the report is filed the number of vehicles, by make and model year, that meet the applicable Type 2 seat belt for each rear designated seating position requirements of Standard No. 208.
#### § 236.384 Cross protection.

Cross protection shall be tested at least once every six months.

[49 FR 3385, Jan. 26, 1984]
Docket: EBSA-2010-0007 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in 

Retirement Plans 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0007-0001 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options 

Document: EBSA-2010-0007-DRAFT-0005 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: Mike Eckardt 

Address: 

Cary, NC, 

General Comment 

Horrible Idea!!!! While the proposed regulations will not affect me much (my savings have 

already been destroyed by the economy), this will hit so many Americans in a negative way that 

folks are going to remember the text of the Declaration of Independence... 

That Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the 

governed, That Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the 

Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government... 

Its hard to put down a revolt with 99% of the people in favor of it. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: February 17, 2010 

Received: February 03, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80a8cabd 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 2/17/2010
----

(2004/C 84 E/0097)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3688/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(9 December 2003)

Subject:   Update on use of funding from the Ecos-Ouverture II programme by the municipality of Perugia

In its answer to question E-1110/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Perugia had submitted projects and secured funding under the Ecos-Ouverture programme, the Commission stated that the city had applied twice, in 1997 and 1999, but that it had not received funding in either case.

Can the Commission say why the projects were not considered suitable?

Has the Commission completed its examination of the final reports mentioned in its answers and, if so, can it supply any information on the outcome?

----

(1)OJ C 11 E, 15.1.2004, p. 139.

----
Order filed March 19, 2020 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-20-00180-CV

____________

ROBERT WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

PROPERTY FRAMEWORKS AS AGENT FOR RAFAEL ALICEA, 

Appellee

On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1147730

O R D E R

This is an appeal from a judgment signed January 28, 2020. The notice of 

appeal was due February 27, 2020. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant, however, 

filed the notice of appeal on March 2, 2020, a date within 15 days of the due date 

for the notice of appeal. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied 

when the perfecting instrument is filed within 15 days of its due date. Verburgt v. 

Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant did not file a motion to 
extend time to file the notice of appeal. While an extension may be implied, 

appellant is still obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to 

support the late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd., 974 

S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.). 

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to 

file the notice of appeal on or before 10 days after the date of this order. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 26.3;10.5(b). If appellant does not comply with this order, we will 

dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Spain.
----

(2004/C 84 E/0457)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0431/04

by Luigi Vinci (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(17 February 2004)

Subject:   European Commission plan for a vertical-takeoff convertiplane

Considering that:

Can the Commission indicate:

Answer given by Mr Busquin on behalf of the Commission

(16 March 2004)

The European rotorcraft industry had already submitted a proposal for a large project on tilt-rotors in the Fifth Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development (RTD) (FP5). It was submitted twice without success. In the meantime, a number of critical technology projects were selected in FP5 that address basic R&D topics on tilt rotor technology. Depending on the results and potential arising from ongoing research, there is a possibility that the topic of tilt rotor technology may be included in the work programme for the third call for proposals, foreseen to be published in May 2005, under the Sixth EU Framework Programme for RTD (FP6, 2002-2006). If this possibility is confirmed, an estimated overall budget envelope in the range of EUR 90 to EUR 100 million could be available for this research, up to 50 % coming from the FP6 budget. The European industry is known to be preparing itself in view of this possibility. No specific reference is made to a tilt rotor development in the current version of the FP6 aeronautics work programme.

There is no contract signed in 2002 between the Commission and Agusta and/or Eurocopter. Furthermore, the Commission funds projects dealing with research, technology development and concept validation. Industrial project development is not included among the activities covered by the Framework Programme of the Commission.

As a point of clarification, it is to be noted that ERICA is an industrial feasibility study (not a European project as such) carried out jointly by Agusta-Westland and Eurocopter that investigates a different technological concept from the one BA609 is based upon.

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                     Exhibit 10.5


                     COGNITRONICS CORPORATION


                    1996 EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN



The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Cognitronics
Corporation has adoptedand approved this 1996 Executive Bonus Plan as a part of
the 1996 compensation packages for each of the following executive officers:
President, Treasurer, Vice President - Engineering, Vice President -
Manufacturing and Vice President - Sales.

The aggregate bonus pool to be established for the above designated participants
consists of two components: A - a varying amount based on the achievement of
stipulated levels of consolidated income before taxes exclusive of executive
bonus expense and special or non-recurring charges ("Operating Income"); and
B - a discretionary amount not to exceed an aggregate of $75,000 based on the
attainment of performance goals by the individual participants.

The bonus pool is to be calculated as follows:



                                                   Component
                                  ------------------------------------------
  Range of Operating Income                     A                      B      
  -------------------------       ------------------------------   ---------- 

Under $1.0 million                                0                    $75,000


$1.0 million to $1.99 million     8% of Operating Income in            $50,000
                                  excess of $1.0 million            

$2.0 million to $2.99 million     $80,000 plus 10% of Operating        $25,000
                                  Income in excess of $2.0 million

$3.0 million and over             $180,000 plus 10% of Operating         $0
                                  Income in excess of $3.0 million


Component A -  To be allocated among the participants by the Compensation
               Committee after reviewing the written recommendations of the
               President; however, the President's share of this pool cannot
               exceed 50% and not less than 50% must be allocated among the
               other four participants.

Component B -  To be allocated among the participants by the Compensation
               Committee based the attainment of individual performance goals,
               except that the President cannot participate in this component if
               Operating Income is less than $1.3 million.
-  Currency                  -  Circulating Currency 
                -  The Buck Starts Here:  How Money is Made 
                -  Currency Redesign 
                -  Serial Numbers 
                -  Quality Assurance 
                -  History 
                -  Production Figures                    -  Annual Production Reports 
                  -  Monthly Production Reports 
                -  FAQs 
                -  Education and Training Materials 
                -  Currency Image Use 

# Monthly Production Reports

## Calendar Year 2024

## Fiscal Year 2024

## Fiscal Year 2023

##  

## Fiscal Year 2022

 

## Fiscal Year 2021

##  

## Fiscal Year 2020

##  

## Fiscal Year 2019

##  

## Fiscal Year 2018

##  

## Fiscal Year 2017

##  

## Fiscal Year 2016

##  

## Fiscal Year 2015

##  

## Fiscal Year 2014

##  

## Fiscal Year 2013

##  

## Fiscal Year 2012

##  

## Fiscal Year 2011

##  

## Fiscal Year 2010

##  

## Fiscal Year 2009

##  

## Fiscal Year 2008

##  

## Fiscal Year 2007

##  

## Fiscal Year 2006

##  

## Fiscal Year 2005

##  

## Fiscal Year 2004

##  

## Fiscal Year 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 384 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 23, 2002.
Whereas the United States Secret Service New York field office located in 7 
        World Trade Center was destroyed on September 11, 2001, as a result of 
        terrorist attacks;
Whereas, throughout the day of the attacks and subsequent days, the men and 
        women of the New York field office continually and knowingly placed 
        themselves in exceptional danger in their efforts to save life;
Whereas, in selfless dedication to others, Master Special Officer Craig Miller 
        was lost in the collapse of the World Trade Center;
Whereas, subsequent to the terrorist attacks, the men and women of the United 
        States Secret Service New York field office worked tirelessly to re-
        establish critical field office operations and assist State and local 
        public safety officials; and
Whereas the United States Secret Service performs a critical role in the 
        protection of freedom, and these acts represent a dedication to duty in 
        the highest traditions of the Department of the Treasury and the United 
        States of America: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors the continuing service and commitment of the men and 
        women assigned to the United States Secret Service, New York field 
        office;
            (2) recognizes the critical importance of the United States Secret 
        Service to our national security; and
            (3) supports providing the necessary resources to ensure the full 
        operation of the New York field office and the mission of the Secret 
        Service.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
From: Mack Howard [mailto:mackhoward@mhcable.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 5:20 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Proposed Annuitization Of 401(k)

Hello -

 

In response to your question #13:

 

"Should some form of lifetime income distribution option be required for defined contribution plans 

(in addition to money purchase pension plans)? If so, should that option be the default 

distribution option, and should it apply to the entire account balance? To what extent would 

such a requirement encourage or discourage plan sponsorship?"

 

I am a U.S. Citizen, a Registered Voter, and a Taxpayer. I was born here, and have lived and 

worked in the U.S. for my entire life. During that time, I have always paid my taxes, paid my bills, 

and been a very responsible citizen of this great country. Over the past 35 years I have made 

contributions to my retirement plan, awaiting the day when I am finally able to retire, and to then 

live on income from my retirement plan, as I see fit.

 

Make no mistake, my retirement plan is MY money. 

 

This is NOT your money to "play with", or to decide how or when it is distributed.

 

You have no moral right, and you should never have a legal right to ever dictate how I will receive 

MY money (despite whatever future legislation you might try to pass).

 

I didn't create the financial mess that our country is in...so don't expect me to fix it, by allowing 

you to control MY money.

 

Thanks...but no thanks!
^.,;p;|ji^.^f^O^^^^ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

"""^'•- ^- '^^•^'FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

OCT 12 P 1^ ^i1 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

J. Randolph Babbitt, ADMINISTRATOR, 

Federal Aviation Administration, 

Complainant, 

V. 

LIBERTY JET MANAGEMENT 

CORPORATION, 

Respondent. 

RECEIVED 

HEARING DOCKET 

201 lEAl 10025 

Judge: Not yet assigned 

Hearing Date: Not yet assigned 

Hearing Location: Not yet assigned 

jf~^^>^viS .^Lon-/i^o^ 

WITHDRAWAL OF REQUEST FOR HEARING 

COMES NOW, Respondent, Liberty Jet Management Corporation, by and through 

undersigned counsel, pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 13.215, and hereby withdraws its request for 

hearing based on a settlement agreement reached with counsel for Complainant. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: October 3, 2011 

Kent S. Jackson, Esq. 

Jackson & Wade, L.L.C. 

21628 Midland Drive 

Shawnee, KS 66218 

Tel: 913 338-1700 

Fax:913 338-1755 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this date served via Federal Express, postage prepaid, an 

original and one (1) copy of the foregoing Withdrawal of Request for Hearing addressed 

to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Wilbur Wright Building - Room 2014 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Tel: 202-267-3111 

Fax: 202-267-5047 

And, further, that I have this date served via Federal Express, postage prepaid, a copy of 

the foregoing Withdrawal of Request for Hearing addressed to: 

Zachary M. Bcrman, Esq. 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

FAA Eastern Region, AEA-7 

One Aviation Plaza, Room 561 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

Tel: 718 553-3258 

Fax:718 995-5699 

Dated: October 3. 2011 

Kent S. Jackson, Esq. 

Jackson & Wade, L.L.C. 

21628 Midland Drive 

Shawnee, KS 66218 

Tel: 913 338-1700 

Fax:913 338-1755
#### § 585.85 Response to inquiries.

At any time prior to August 31, 2011, each manufacturer must, upon request from the Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, provide information identifying the vehicles (by make, model, and vehicle identification number) that have been certified as complying with Standard No. 126 (49 CFR 571.126). The manufacturer's designation of a vehicle as a certified vehicle is irrevocable. Upon request, the manufacturer also must specify whether it intends to utilize carry-forward credits, and the vehicles to which those credits relate.
----

**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                March 1, 2007 | By:    | /s/                Charles N. Eldred     |
|------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|                               |   | Charles                N. Eldred         |
|                               |   | Senior                Vice President and |
|                               |   | Chief                Financial Officer   |
|                               |   | PNM                Resources, Inc.       |
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the As Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, John R. Ambroseo certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Coherent, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Coherent, Inc.

Date:
December 14, 2010

By:

/s/ JOHN R. AMBROSEO John R. Ambroseo President and Chief Executive Officer


---
###### Editorial Note on Part 325

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 325 appear at 66 FR 49869, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 325.73 Microphone distance correction factors.[1]

If the distance between the microphone location point and the microphone target point is other than 50 feet (15.2 m), the maximum observed sound level reading generated by the motor vehicle in accordance with § 325.39 of this part or the numerical average of the recorded maximum observed sound level readings generated by the motor vehicle in accordance with § 325.59 of this part shall be corrected as specified in the following table:

| If the distance between the microphone location point and the microphone target point is | The value dB(A) to be applied to the observed sound level reading is— |
| --- | --- |
| 31 feet (9.5 m) or more but less than 35 feet (10.7 m) | −4 |
| 35 feet (10.7 m) or more but less than 39 feet (11.9 m) | −3 |
| 39 feet (11.9 m) or more but less than 43 feet (13.1 m) | −2 |
| 43 feet (13.1 m) or more but less than 48 feet (14.6 m) | −1 |
| 48 feet (14.6 m) or more but less than 58 feet (17.7 m) | 0 |
| 58 feet (17.7 m) or more but less than 70 feet (21.3 m) | + 1 |
| 70 feet (21.3 m) or more but less than 83 feet (25.3 m) | + 2 |

Table 2—Distance Correction Factors

[40 FR 42437, Sept. 12, 1975, as amended at 54 FR 50385, Dec. 6, 1989]

###### Footnotes -
  325.73

[1] Table 1, in § 325.7 is a tabulation of the maximum allowable sound level readings taking into account both the distance correction factors contained in § 325.73 and the ground surface correction factors contained in § 325.75.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0916.html[7/21/2015 6:12:11 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-8uta

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0916

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: paul schoenberg

Address:

10730 monticello rd

pinckney, MI, 48169

General Comment

I do not want any more law9 or regulation that will efect my 401k retiretirement.
i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Editorial Note on Part 572
Editorial Notes: 1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 572.164 Thorax assembly and test procedure. ( a ) *Thorax (upper torso) assembly.* The thorax consists of the part of the torso assembly shown in drawing 167-2000 (incorporated by reference, see § 572.160).
( b ) When the anterior surface of the thorax of a completely assembled dummy (drawing 167-2000) that is seated as shown in Figure S1 is impacted by a test probe conforming to 49 CFR 572.127(a) at 6.71 ±0.12 m/s (22.0 ±0.4 ft/s) according to the test procedure specified in 49 CFR 572.124(c): ( 1 ) The maximum sternum displacement relative to the spine, measured with chest deflection transducer (specified in 49 CFR 572.124(b)(1)), must be not less than 38.0 mm (1.50 in) and not more than 46.0 mm (1.80 in). Within this specified compression corridor, the peak force, measured by the probe in accordance with 49 CFR 572.127, must be not less than 1205 N (270.9 lbf) and not more than 1435 N (322.6 lbf). The peak force after 12.5 mm (0.5 in) of sternum displacement, but before reaching the minimum required 38.0 mm (1.46 in) sternum displacement limit, must not exceed an upper limit of 1500 N.
( 2 ) The internal hysteresis of the ribcage in each impact as determined by the plot of force vs. deflection in paragraph (b)(1) of this section must be not less than 65 percent but not more than 85 percent.
( c ) *Test procedure.* The thorax assembly is tested as specified in 49 CFR 572.124(c).