alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 611.305 Small Starts local financial commitment criteria. In order to approve a grant under 49 U.S.C. 5309 for a Small Starts project, FTA must find that the proposed project is supported by an acceptable degree of local financial commitment, as required by 49 U.S.C. 5309(h)(3)(c). The local financial commitment to a proposed project will be evaluated according to the following measures: ( a ) The proposed share of the project's capital costs to be funded from sources other than Small Starts funds, including both the non-Small Starts match required by Federal law and any additional state, local, or other Federal capital funding (known as “overmatch”);
( b ) The current capital and operating financial condition of the project sponsor;
( c ) The commitment of capital and operating funds for the project and the entire transit system including consideration of private contributions; and
( d ) The accuracy and reliability of the capital and operating costs and revenue estimates and the financial capacity of the project sponsor.
( e ) From time to time FTA may publish through policy guidance standards based on characteristics of projects and/or the corridors to be served. If a proposed project can meet the established standards, FTA may assign an automatic rating on one or more of the local financial commitment criteria outlined in this section.
( f ) FTA may amend the measures for these local financial commitment criteria. Any such amendment will be included in policy guidance and subject to a public comment process.
( g ) As a candidate project proceeds through project development, a greater level of local financial commitment will be expected.
( h ) For each proposed project, ratings for paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section will be reported in terms of descriptive indicators, as follows: “high,” “medium-high,” “medium,” “medium-low,” or “low.” For paragraph (a) of this section, the percentage of Small Starts funding sought from 49 U.S.C. 5309 will be rated and used to develop the summary local financial commitment rating, but only if it improves the rating and not if it worsens the rating.
( i ) The ratings for each measure described in this section will be combined into a summary local financial commitment rating of “high,” “medium-high,” “medium,” “medium-low,” or “low.” The process by which the summary local financial commitment rating will be developed, including the assigned weights to each of the measures, will be described in policy guidance.
§ 91.11 Standards. ( a ) To minimize the burden of implementing this part on the United States, on U.S. flag air carriers and on foreign air carriers, estimates and periodic adjustments will be used to determine the amount of discrimination and compensatory charges therefor.
( b ) For the purpose of determining the amount of excessive or otherwise discriminatory charges imposed upon U.S. flag air carriers by an entity: ( 1 ) A service or use of airport or airway property includes, but is not limited to, fueling, food service, ticketing, baggage handling, runways, ramps, parking areas, navigational aids, communications facilities or any other service necessary and incidental to the conduct of a flight.
( 2 ) An excessive or otherwise discriminatory charge includes, but is not limited to, a charge substantially above the cost of providing a service or any charge for a service that is substantially inferior to that which the U.S. flag air carrier could have provided for itself, at the same cost, by contract or otherwise (*see also* § 91.3).
( c ) In determining the amount of compensatory charge: ( 1 ) The total amount of excessive or otherwise discriminatory charges levied against U.S. flag air carriers will be estimated in dollars.
( 2 ) The total volume of operations to the United States by air carriers of the nation concerned will be estimated for the succeeding six-month period.
( 3 ) The total amount of excessive or otherwise discriminatory charges in paragraph (c)(1) of this section will be divided by the total volume of operations in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, and
( 4 ) The quotient thus computed (which may be adjusted to reflect the type of aircraft) will constitute the compensatory charge to be collected as a condition to acceptance of the general declaration at the time of landing or takeoff of such air carriers of the nation concerned.
#### § 585.61 Scope.

This subpart establishes requirements for manufacturers of passenger cars, multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks, and buses with a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) or less, except those vehicles with dual wheels on an axle, to submit a report, and maintain records related to the report, concerning the number of such vehicles that meet the requirements of Standard No. 138, *Tire pressure monitoring systems* (49 CFR 571.138).
Siblings in Arms
 By Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Bryan Blair , 5th Fleet Public Affairs - NAVCENT
  NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY BAHRAIN – The two culinary specialists were all smiles as they sat together in the flag mess of Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command (NAVCENT) headquarters, July 21. “His name is Ariel,” said Master Chief Culinary Specialist Arturo Luna. “Like the mermaid,” he laughed along with his younger brother, Senior Chief Culinary Specialist Ariel Luna, who reported to NAVCENT July 18, and will take over as the enlisted aide. Arturo is the N0 division senior enlisted advisor, and has been stationed at NAVCENT since June 2012. They were born and raised in Pampanga, Philippines, with two other brothers and three sisters. One of those brothers, Anthony, is a retired Senior Chief Logistics Specialist. Arturo and Ariel have encountered one another a few times during their naval careers. They began their journeys together when they reported aboard Naval Station San Diego for basic training June 19, 1991. “They found out we were brothers and separated us into different divisions,” said Ariel. “Obviously, if we got into any trouble the last thing they would want is for my brother to come to my defense or vice versa.” Following boot camp they went their separate ways and later on as 2nd class petty officers, they found each other in close proximity once again while stationed aboard Naval Station Alameda, Calif. Arturo worked at the base galley and Ariel worked in the barracks.  Ariel said when they weren’t together they always found a way to work together. “We have always called and asked each other for advice,” said Ariel. “If one of us had a function, needed an idea, or if one of us had a problem, we’d call the other and work through it together.” They said now that they’re working side by side, the teamwork will come even more easily. Through their various experiences in their extensive naval careers, they will bring their own brand of leadership to NAVCENT. “The thing that’s most different now is the wealth of knowledge the two of us have,” said Arturo. “We’ve both been around the world and mentored not only CS’s, but Sailors from all rates, all ranks and duty stations all around the globe. Together, we can take our combined knowledge and share it with the Sailors here in 5th Fleet.” “A lot has changed since we joined,” said Ariel. “The way the Navy operates and the ways Sailors operate are very different now, but the one thing that never changes is the importance of teamwork and striving to always better ourselves. My brother and I will take the teamwork we’ve had since we were kids and use it to make this strong NAVCENT team even stronger.”
#### § 557.1 Scope.

This part establishes procedures under section 156 of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966, as amended (88 Stat. 1470, 15 U.S.C. 1416), for the submission and disposition of petitions filed by interested persons for hearings on the question of whether a manufacturer has reasonably met his obligation to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a safety-related defect or failure to comply with a Federal motor vehicle safety standard, or to remedy such defect or failure to comply. This part also establishes procedures for holding a hearing on these questions.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<CIK>  0000022767              
<NAME> TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER CO.                       
                      
<MULTIPLIER>                     1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      922,831
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      2,116
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          19,913
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        28,706
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 973,566
<COMMON>                                           107
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      222,149
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             79,840
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 302,096
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,060
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           450,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 218,410
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  973,566
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      586,445
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            16,863
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     482,434
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     499,297
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         87,148
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 900
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  88,048
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        53,727
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,321
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        150
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   34,171
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        19,099
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       48,342
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          99,317
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
----

(2004/C 84 E/0681)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0491/04

by Jules Maaten (ELDR) to the Commission

(23 February 2004)

Subject:   Land Use Plans Implementation Law in Valencia — LRAU

Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(25 March 2004)

----
IV

House Calendar No. 121

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 342

[Report No. 107–356]

Providing for the consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 5, 2002

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered

to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for the consideration of motions to suspend the

rules.

1 Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on

2 the legislative day of Wednesday, February 6, 2002, for

3 the Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend

4 the rules relating to the following measures:

5 (1) The concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res.

6 312) expressing the sense of the House of Rep7 resentatives that the scheduled tax relief provided

8 for by the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Rec-
2

HRES 342 RH

1 onciliation Act of 2001 passed by a bipartisan ma2 jority in Congress should not be suspended or re3 pealed.

4 (2) The joint resolution (H.J. Res. 82) recog5 nizing the 91st birthday of Ronald Reagan.

6 (3) The resolution (H. Res. 340) recognizing

7 and honoring Jack Shea, Olympic gold medalist in

8 speed skating, for his many contributions to the Na9 tion and to his community throughout his life.

House Calendar No. 121

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 342

[Report No. 107–356]

RESOLUTION

Providing for the consideration of motions to

suspend the rules.

FEBRUARY 5, 2002

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
#### § 800.32 Initiation of rulemaking.

The NTSB may initiate rulemaking either on its own motion or on petition by any interested person after a determination that grant of the petition is advisable. The NTSB may also consider the recommendations of other agencies of the United States.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; DNA Repair and Cellular Aging.                    

*Date:*                         October 18, 2023                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Gianina Ramona Dumitrescu, Ph.D., M.P.H., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room: 4193-C, Bethesda, MD 28092, 301-827-0696,                         *dumitrescurg@csr.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 21, 2023.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-18383 Filed 8-24-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of eAutoclaims, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 12, 2007 (the Report), I, Larry Colton, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of eAutoclaims, Inc.





/s/   Larry Colton


Print Name:   Larry Colton

Title:   Chief Financial Officer

June 12, 2007











---
<PAGE>

                                     Exhibit (23)-2
                                     Commonwealth Edison Company
                                     Form 10-K File No. 1-1839



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                   -----------------------------------------



     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in this Form 10-K of our report dated January 31, 2000, on
Commonwealth Edison Company and Subsidiary Companies' consolidated financial
statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 1999, included in
Commonwealth Edison Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 2000,
to the inclusion in this Form 10-K of our report dated January 31, 2000, on the
supplemental schedule of Commonwealth Edison Company as of and for the year
ended December 31, 1999, and to the incorporation of such reports into
Commonwealth Edison Company's previously filed prospectuses as follows: (1)
prospectus dated August 21, 1986, constituting part of Form S-3 Registration
Statement File No. 33-6879, as amended (relating to the Company's Debt
Securities and Common Stock); (2) prospectus dated January 7, 1994, constituting
part of Form S-3 Registration Statement File No. 33-51379 (relating to the
Company's Debt Securities and Cumulative Preference Stock); (3) prospectus dated
September 19, 1995, constituting part of Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3
Registration Statement File No. 33-61343, as amended (relating to Company-
Obligated Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Securities of ComEd Financing I); (4)
prospectus dated June 13, 1997, constituting part of Form S-4 Registration
Statement File No. 333-28369 (relating to Company-Obligated Mandatorily
Redeemable Preferred Securities of ComEd Financing II); and (5) Form S-8
Registration Statement File No. 333-33847 (relating to the Commonwealth Edison
Company Excess Benefit Savings Plan).



                                         ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Chicago, Illinois
March 29, 2000
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSpacecraft attitude impacts on COLD-SAT non-vacuum jacketed LH2 supply tank thermal performanceThe Cryogenic On-Orbit Liquid Depot - Storage, Acquisition and Transfer (COLD-SAT) spacecraft will be launched into low earth orbit to perform fluid management experiments on the behavior of subcritical liquid hydrogen (LH2). For determining the optimum on-orbit attitude for the COLD-SAT satellite, a comparative analytical study was performed to determine the thermal impacts of spacecraft attitude on the performance of the COLD-SAT non-vacuum jacketed LH2 supply tank. Tank thermal performance was quantified by total conductive and radiative heat leakage into the pressure vessel due to the absorbed solar, earth albedo and infra-red on-orbit fluxes, and also by the uniformity of the variation of this leakage on the vessel surface area. Geometric and thermal analysis math models were developed for the spacecraft and the tank as part of this analysis, based on their individual thermal/structural designs. Two quasi-inertial spacecraft attitudes were investigated and their effects on the tank performance compared. The results are one of the criteria by which the spacecraft orientation in orbit was selected for the in-house NASA Lewis Research Center design.Document ID19900013276Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsArif, Hugh*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-103158E-5525NAS 1.15:103158AIAA PAPER 90-1672Meeting InformationMeeting: Joint Thermophysics and Heat Transfer ConferenceLocation: Seattle, WACountry: United StatesStart Date: June 18, 1990End Date: June 20, 1990Sponsors:ASME,AIAAAccession Number90N22592Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-48-21Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900013276.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DEAN MARTIN KIDDER, II,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

LOS ANGELES COUNTY; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 15

- 55595

D.C. No. 2:14

- cv

- 06218

- SVW

- E

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 8, 2017 **

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Dean Martin Kidder, II , appeals pro se from the district court’s summary

judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal and state law claims. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo

. Balvage v.

Ryderwood Improvement & Serv. Ass'n, Inc. , 642 F .3d 765, 775 (9th Cir. 2011)

.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 21 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 55595

We affirm.

The district court properly entered a stipulated judgment in favor of

defendants because Kidder failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to

whether the deputy did not have reasonable suspicion to execute the traffic stop or

probable cause to conduct the automobile search. See United States v. Willis , 431

F.3d 709, 7 14

- 1 6 (9th Cir. 2005) ( no Fourth Amendment violation where officer

has reasonabl e susp icion that a traffic violation occurred ); Uni ted States v. Pinela

Hernandez , 262 F.3d 974, 977

- 78 (9th Cir. 2001) (police may conduct a

warrantless search of a vehicle if they have probable cause to believe that it

contains con traband)

.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.