alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1994
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1993
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1994
<CASH>                                           1,781
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,848
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,574
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,076
<PP&E>                                          29,326
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,338
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,226
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,664
<BONDS>                                         10,477
<COMMON>                                            22
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,077
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,226
<SALES>                                         34,277
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,327
<CGS>                                           31,875
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,875
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,013
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,558
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,228
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7,551)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       301
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (7,852)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7,852)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (3.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (3.57)
        

</TABLE>
#### Richard A. Springs et al., Respondents, *v.*David W. James, Appellant.

*Springs*v. James, 137 App. Div. 110, affirmed.

(Argued May 11, 1911;

decided, June 13, 1911.)

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 24, 1910, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon the report of a referee in an action to recover money alleged to have been paid out for the benefit of defendant.

*604
      *Herbert*D. *Mason, Victor Lamar Smith*and *William L. Ransom*for appellant.

*John R. Abney*and *Edward D. Brown*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Chase and Collin, JJ. Not voting: Cullen, Ch. J., and Hisoook, J.
#### § 585.125 Response to inquiries.

At anytime during the production years ending April 30, 2017, and April 30, 2018, each manufacturer shall, upon request from the Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, provide information identifying the vehicles (by make, model and vehicle identification number) that have been certified as complying with the rear visibility requirements in paragraphs S5.5 and S6.2 of Standard No. 111, Rear visibility (49 CFR 571.111). The manufacturer's designation of a vehicle as a certified vehicle is irrevocable.
Editorial Note on Part 192
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 192 appear at 71 FR 33406, June 9, 2006.

§ 192.473 External corrosion control: Interference currents. ( a ) Each operator whose pipeline system is subjected to stray currents shall have in effect a continuing program to minimize the detrimental effects of such currents.
( b ) Each impressed current type cathodic protection system or galvanic anode system must be designed and installed so as to minimize any adverse effects on existing adjacent underground metallic structures.
( c ) For onshore gas transmission pipelines, the program required by paragraph (a) of this section must include: ( 1 ) Interference surveys for a pipeline system to detect the presence and level of any electrical stray current. Interference surveys must be conducted when potential monitoring indicates a significant increase in stray current, or when new potential stray current sources are introduced, such as through co-located pipelines, structures, or high voltage alternating current (HVAC) power lines, including from additional generation, a voltage up-rating, additional lines, new or enlarged power substations, or new pipelines or other structures;
( 2 ) Analysis of the results of the survey to determine the cause of the interference and whether the level could cause significant corrosion, impede safe operation, or adversely affect the environment or public;
( 3 ) Development of a remedial action plan to correct any instances where interference current is greater than or equal to 100 amps per meter squared alternating current (AC), or if it impedes the safe operation of a pipeline, or if it may cause a condition that would adversely impact the environment or the public; and
( 4 ) Application for any necessary permits within 6 months of completing the interference survey that identified the deficiency. An operator must complete remedial actions promptly, but no later than the earliest of the following: within 15 months after completing the interference survey that identified the deficiency; or as soon as practicable, but not to exceed 6 months, after obtaining any necessary permits.
[Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12302, June 30, 1971, as amended by Amdt. 192-33, 43 FR 39390, Sept. 5, 1978; Amdt. 192-132, 87 FR 92269, Aug. 24, 2022; Amdt. 192-133, 88 FR 24711, Apr. 24, 2023]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1335.html[7/22/2015 10:36:11 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvh-o3ek

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1335

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Carmen Kaler

General Comment

I can plan for my retirement. We don't need your help.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

Summary of Vans, Inc. Long-Term Executive Bonus Plan. The Vans, Inc. Long-Term
Executive Bonus Plan is designed to incentivize Vans' executive officers to
maximize Vans' earnings per share over an extended period of time. Under the
plan, as amended, each participant has the opportunity to earn a bonus equal to
a multiple of the participant's fiscal 2001 bonus if Vans achieves certain
earnings per share targets for each fiscal year during the period of the Plan,
as determined by the Compensation Committee, and if the participant achieves
other goals and objectives set for him or her. In order to receive the bonus,
the officer must be employed by Vans at either the end of the fiscal year in
which the bonus becomes 100% earned or May 31, 2006, whichever is earlier. The
plan, as amended, covers the period June 1, 2004, through May 31, 2006.
§ 604.32 Investigation of complaint. ( a ) If, based on the pleadings, there appears to be a reasonable basis for investigation, FTA shall investigate the subject matter of the complaint.
( b ) The investigation may include a review of written submissions or pleadings of the parties, as supplemented by any informal investigation FTA considers necessary and by additional information furnished by the parties at FTA request. Each party shall file documents that it considers sufficient to present all relevant facts and argument necessary for FTA to determine whether the recipient is in compliance.
( c ) The Chief Counsel shall send a notice to complainant(s) and respondent(s) once an investigation is complete, but not later than 90 days after receipt of the last pleading specified in § 604.27 was due to FTA.
§ 583.16 Maintenance of records. ( a ) *General.* Each manufacturer of new passenger motor vehicles and each supplier of passenger motor vehicle equipment subject to this part shall establish, maintain, and retain in organized and indexed form, records as specified in this section. All records, including the certificates provided by suppliers, may be stored in any mode provided the mode contains all information in the records and certificates.
( b ) *Manufacturers.* Each manufacturer shall maintain all records which provide a basis for the information it provides on the labels required by § 583.5, including, but not limited to, certificates from suppliers, parts lists, calculations of content, and relevant contracts with suppliers. The records shall be maintained for five years after December 31 of the model year to which the records relate.
( c ) *Suppliers.* Each supplier shall maintain all records which form a basis for the information it provides on the certificates required by §§ 583.10, 583.11, and 583.12, including, but not limited to, calculations of content, certificates from suppliers, and relevant contracts with manufacturers and suppliers. The records shall be maintained for six years after December 31 of the calendar year set forth in the date of each certificate.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, September 29, 1995 (123), Para 123.37 Senate Bills Referred]
[Page 1492]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.123.37  senate bills referred

  Bills of the Senate of the following titles were taken from the 
Speaker's table and, under the rule, referred as follows:

       S. 144. An Act to amend section 526 of title 28, United 
     States Code, to authorize awards of attorney's fees; to the 
     Committee on the Judiciary.
       S. 531. An Act to authorize a circuit judge who has taken 
     part in an en banc hearing of a case to continue to 
     participate in that case after taking senior status, and for 
     other purposes; to the Committee on the Judiciary.
       S. 977. An Act to correct certain references in the 
     Bankruptcy Code; to the Committee on the Judiciary.
       S. 1147. An Act to extend and reauthorize the Defense 
     Production Act of 1950, and for other purposes; to the 
     Committee on Banking and Finance.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

ERIC DOBRANSKY,

Respondent

v.

EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY AND HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.,

Petitioners :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 120 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14th day of September, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

. The Application to File Under Seal and Application for Leave to File a Reply

are DENIED as moot.
Hillsborough,

June, 1900.

#### State (Reynolds, *Compl't) v.*McKenna.

Complaint, for bastardy. At a former term of court the defendant was found chargeable and ordered to pay a certain sum. A *capias*execution for the sum was issued, upon which the defendant was arrested; and, having given a bond' for the purpose, he subsequently took the poor debtor’s oath, the plaintiff objecting. At the May term, which was since the oath was taken, the action was brought forward, and the plaintiff’s motion that the defendant he committed until he paid the sum ordered was denied *pro forma,*subject to exception.

*Andrews & Andrews,*for the plaintiff.

*Drury*& *Hurd,*for the defendant.

Peaslee, J.,

having been of counsel, did not sit; and the other members of the court being equally divided on the question, the motion failed of being granted.
#### § 390.37 Violation and penalty.

Any person who violates the rules set forth in this subchapter or part 325 of subchapter A may be subject to civil or criminal penalties.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBC) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Tony J. Sorcic, President & Chief Executive Officer of
PNBC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:



(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of PNBC.






/s/ Tony J. SorcicTony J. SorcicPresident & Chief Executive Officer

November 6, 2007




---
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 26

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the disparity

between identical prescription drugs sold in the United States, Canada,

and Mexico.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 31, 2001

Mr. BALDACCI (for himself and Mrs. EMERSON) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the disparity between identical prescription drugs

sold in the United States, Canada, and Mexico.

Whereas according to the General Accounting Office, a consumer in the United States pays on average one-third

more for a prescription drug than a consumer pays for

the same drug in another country;

Whereas according to the General Accounting Office, costs

for prescription drugs between 1993 and 1998 increased

an average of 12.4 percent per year as compared to an

increase of 5 percent per year for health care expenditures in general;

Whereas currently one-third of senior citizens in the United

States are without prescription drug insurance, and these
2

•HRES 26 IH

individuals pay on average 15 percent more for a prescription than do citizens with prescription drug insurance coverage;

Whereas it is difficult for many Americans, including senior

citizens, to afford the prescription drugs that they need

to stay healthy;

Whereas many senior citizens in the United States leave the

country and go to Canada or Mexico to buy prescription

drugs that are developed, manufactured, and approved in

the United States in order to buy such drugs at lower

prices than such drugs are sold for in the United States;

Whereas the United States has made a strong commitment

to supporting the research and development of new drugs

through taxpayer-supported funding of the National Institutes of Health, through the research and development

tax credit, and through other means;

Whereas the development of new drugs is important because

the use of such drugs enables people to live longer and

lead healthier, more productive lives;

Whereas citizens of other countries should pay a portion of

the research and development costs for new drugs, or

their fair share of such costs, rather than just reap the

benefits of such drugs; and

Whereas many State governments are undertaking a variety

of plans to address the needs of citizens who lack affordable drug coverage: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the cost disparity between identical pre-
3

•HRES 26 IH

1 scription drugs sold in the United States, Canada, and

2 Mexico should be reduced or eliminated.

Æ
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 32002D1011(01)

**Council Decision of 23 September 2002 appointing members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Social Security for Migrant Workers***Official Journal C 245 , 11/10/2002 P. 0001 - 0003*

Council Decision

of 23 September 2002

appointing members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Social Security for Migrant Workers

(2002/C 245/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community(1), and in particular Article 82 thereof,

Having regard to the lists of candidates submitted to the Council by the Governments of the Member States,

Whereas:

(1) By its Decision of 28 February 2000(2) the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Social Security for Migrant Workers for the period 28 February 2000 to 27 February 2002;

(2) Members and alternate members of that Committee should be appointed for two years,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Social Security for Migrant Workers for the period 23 September 2002 to 22 September 2004:

I. GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES

>TABLE>

II. TRADE UNION REPRESENTATIVES

>TABLE>

III. REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYERS' ORGANISATIONS

>TABLE>

Article 2

The Council will appoint the members not yet nominated by Greece and Italy at a later date.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published, for information, in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Done at Brussels on 23 September 2002.

For the Council

The President

M. Fischer Boel

(1) OJ L 149, 5.7.1971, p. 2. Regulation last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1945/93 (OJ L 181, 23.7.1993, p. 1).

(2) OJ C 69, 10.3.2000, p. 2.
#### § 565.11 Applicability.

See subpart A of this part 565 regarding the general applicability of this subpart. This part applies to passenger cars, multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks, buses, trailers (including trailer kits), incomplete vehicles, low speed vehicles, and motorcycles manufactured on or after October 27, 2008 whose VINs have a letter “A” or “B” in the 10th position, and to passenger cars, multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks, buses, trailers (including trailer kits), incomplete vehicles, low speed vehicles, and motorcycles manufactured on or after April 30 2009 that are not identified by their manufacturer as model year 2009 or earlier vehicles. Vehicles imported into the United States under 49 CFR 591.5(f), other than by the corporation responsible for the assembly of that vehicle or a subsidiary of such a corporation, are excluded from requirements of §§ 565.13(b), 565.13(c), 565.13(g), 565.13(h), 565.14 and § 565.15.

[73 FR 23379, Apr. 30, 2008, as amended at 73 FR 28371, May 16, 2008]
EXHIBIT 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of
The CIT Group, Inc.:

      We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in Registration  Statements
No. 33-85224, No. 333-70249,  No. 333-36061,  No. 333-22283,  No. 333-43323, No.
333-64539,  No. 333-64529,  No. 333-73255,  No.  333-74847,  No. 333-34793,  No.
333-71361  and  No.  333-56172  on  Form  S-3 and  Registration  Statements  No.
333-50499,  No. 333-63497,  No. 333-91075,  No. 333-91077, No. 333-91079 and No.
333-52966  on Form S-8 of The CIT Group,  Inc. of our report  dated  January 25,
2001,  except as to Note 25,  which is as of March  13,  2001,  relating  to the
consolidated  balance  sheets of The CIT  Group,  Inc.  and  subsidiaries  as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related  consolidated  statements of income,
changes  in  stockholders' equity,  and cash  flows for each of the years in the
three-year  period ended December 31, 2000, which report appears in the December
31, 2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K of The CIT Group, Inc.

                                                          KPMG LLP

Short Hills, New Jersey
March 26, 2001
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 169 (Friday, August 31, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 50466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4279]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on CARES Business Plan Studies; Notice of 
Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the 
Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Advisory 
Committee on CARES Business Plan Studies will hold a meeting on 
September 17, 2007, at the University of Massachusetts/Boston, Columbia 
Point, Campus Center Ballroom in Boston, Massachusetts. The meeting 
will convene at 1 p.m. and conclude at 6:30 p.m. The meeting is open to 
the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice to the Secretary 
of Veterans Affairs on proposed business plans at those VA facility 
sites identified in May 2004 as requiring further study by the Capital 
Asset Realignment for Enhanced Services (CARES) Decision document.
    The objective of this meeting is to provide the Secretary with 
advice regarding the final selection of a healthcare, capital planning 
and reuse option for the Greater Boston area campuses of the VA New 
England Healthcare System. An analysis of the business planning options 
completed by the VA contractor is to be presented at the meeting prior 
to their final submission to the VA. The agenda will also accommodate 
public commentary on the options.
    Interested persons may attend and present oral or written 
statements to the Committee. For additional information regarding the 
meeting, please contact Mr. Jay Halpern, Designated Federal Officer, 
(00 CARES), at 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, by phone 
at (202) 273-5994, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6f050e1641070e031f0a1d012f190e41080019"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="82e8e3fbaceae3eef2e7f0ecc2f4e3ace5edf4">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: August 27, 2007.
    By direction of the Secretary.
E. Phillip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-4279 Filed 8-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

SETH STEINMAN, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF 

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 56 EM 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 8th day of July, 2015, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED.
1210-AB32-2-1472.html[7/26/2015 5:49:59 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwg-7iyc

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1968

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

LEAVE MY 401K ALONE. i EARNED IT YOU DIDN"T.