alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Attendee Report GoToWebinar

Webinar Name Webinar ID ASRAC Commercial HVAC, CRE, and WH Working Group: Meeting and Webinar305434929 Actual Start Date/Time Actual Duration (minutes) Aug 08, 2013 07:38 AM EDT 444 Total Attended 30 

# Session Details First Name Last Name Email CountryAddress City State Organization Zip Code Jeff Bauman US539 Dunksferry Rd. Bensalem PA National Refrigeration & AC 19020 Rodney Beever US491 E. Princess St. York PA United CoolAir Corp. 17403 Jeremiah Freeman US DOE Washington DC New West Technologies, LLC 20585 Jeremiah Freeman US DOE Washington DC New West 20585 Randy Haseman US 333 Pfingsten Road Northbrook IL UL LLC 60062 Marshall Hunt US245 Market St San Francisco CA PG&E 94177 brian jeanes US 908 hwy 15 north new albany MS master-bilt 38652 Dominic Kolandayan US 1645 Wallace Dr., Suite 110Carrollton PA Daikin 75006 JEFF KOSER US491 EAST PRINCESS ST YORK PA UNITED COOLAIR CORP 17403 Stephen Kowalski US2701 Wilma Rudolph Blvd. Clarksville TN Ingersoll Rand - Trane North America 37040 Jonathan Lemmond US2111 Arlington VA ahri 22201 Paul Lin US 1946 W. Cook Road Fort Wayne IN Regal-Beloit Corporation 46818 Marcos Locke US2201 Dwyer Ave Utica NY ECR International 13501 steven maddox US5005 York Drive norman OK Johnson Controls Inc 73069 John McLaughlin US4900 Tech Blvd Auburn NY Daikin McQuay 13021 David Mecadon US539 Dunksferry Road Bensalem PA National Refrigeration and Air Conditioning19020 John Morris US539 Dunksferry Rd Bensalem PA Continental Refrigerator 19020 David Peterson US PO Box 4729 Utica NY ECR International 13504

wes roan US 1914 Randolph Dr. bryan OH Bard Manufacturing Co., Inc. 43506 Joe Sanders US4401 Blue Mound Rd. Fort Worth TX Traulsen 76106 Stephen Schaefer US 618 Hwy 74 South Peachtree city GA Hoshizaki America 30269 Ron Shebik US 12999 St. Charles Rock RoadBridgeton MO Hussmann Corporation 63044 Louis Starr US421 SW 6th Suite 600 Portland OR NEEA 97204 John Sutphen US 3232 W Lancaster Milwaukee WI Cleaver-Brooks, Inc 53209 Chris Thompson US2175 West Park Place BlvdStone Mountain GA Heatcraft 30087 Eric Truskoski US200 Lafayette St. Middleville MI Bradford White Corporation 49333 Tom Walsh US4900 Tech Park Blvd Auburn NY Daikin McQuay 13021 Robert Whitwell US Carrier Parkway Syracuse NY Carrier 13221 Michael Woodford US2111 Wilson Blvd, Suite 500Arlington VA AHRI 22201 Wesley Wostal US 7300 SW 44th St Oklahoma City OK ClimateMaster 73019 

# General Information
§ 80.13 Threshold criteria. ( a ) To be eligible to receive Federal credit assistance under this part, a project shall meet the following four threshold criteria: ( 1 ) A project shall comply with 23 U.S.C. 602(a)(3).
( 2 ) The State, local servicer, or other entity undertaking the project shall submit a project application to the Secretary of Transportation;
( 3 ) A project shall have eligible project costs that are reasonably anticipated to equal or exceed the lesser of $100 million or 50 percent of the amount of Federal-aid highway funds apportioned for the most recently completed fiscal year to the State in which the project is located (in the case of a project principally involving the installation of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), eligible project costs shall be reasonably anticipated to equal or exceed $30 million);
( 4 ) Project financing shall be repayable, in whole or in part, from tolls, user fees or other dedicated revenue sources; and
( b ) With respect to paragraph (a)(3) of this section, for a project located in more than one State, the minimum cost threshold size shall be the lesser of $100 million or 50 percent of the amount of Federal-aid highway funds apportioned for the most recently completed fiscal year to the participating State that receives the least amount of such funds.
( c ) With respect to paragraph (a)(4) of this section, the Secretary may accept general obligation pledges or general corporate promissory pledges and will determine the acceptability of other pledges and forms of collateral as dedicated revenue sources on a case-by-case basis. The Secretary shall not accept a pledge of Federal funds, regardless of source, as security for the TIFIA credit instrument.
[64 FR 29750, June 2, 1999, as amended at 89 FR 45775, May 24, 2024]
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 05475

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 05475\05475_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05475\05475_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

05475\05475_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 05475\05475_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05475\05475_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05475\05475_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05475\05475_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05475\05475_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

05475\Certification Statement_05475.pdf Plant certification statement

x 05475\Supporting Documentation\05475_Map-1 Osage.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05475\Supporting Documentation\05475_Pond-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05475\Supporting Documentation\05475_Water balance Osage 002.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05475\Supporting Documentation\Water balance Osage 001.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
**EXHIBIT      32**

**Certification      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States      Code)**

| Dated:                  November 21, 2007                                                                                                            |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                                                                 |   |
| /s/                  Wang Wen’geng                                  |   |
| Wang                  Wen’geng, Chief Executive Officer                                                                                        |   |
| (Principal                  executive officer)                                                                                                       |   |
|                                                                                                                                                 |   |
| /s/                  Xiang Qin                                            |   |
| Xiang                  Qin, Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                  |   |
| (Principal                  financial officer)                                                                                                       |   |

----
From: esfolk@gmail.com [mailto:esfolk@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 1:06 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Barbara Lightner 

6217 W. Bennett Ave. 

Milwaukee, WI 53219
#### Ida S. Bush, *Respondent, v.*William B. Post and others, *Appellants.*

— Order overruling defendant’s demurrer affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
-----Original Message----- 

From: ebiz61@rcn.com [mailto:ebiz61@rcn.com] 

Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 12:00 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Lifetime income RFI 

Dear Government people, 

I would like to comment on the proposal that the government require 

adding a lifetime annuity as a rollover and investment option to 401-k 

plans. This choice already exists!!! Why should you require something 

to be when it already is here? Anyone with a 401-k or any other type of 

pension plan which allows for a lump-sum distribution can roll that 

money into an IRA, and that IRA can be funded by just about anything 

including an annuity that has a lifetime option. This allows for 

nearly unlimited choices which allows the retiree to decide how to 

allocate his or her resources the way that fits his or her situation 

the best. THE LIFETIME ANNUITY OPTION IS NOT USUALLY THE BEST CHOICE 

FOR MOST RETIREES. Other options could produce more retirement income 

AND leave more wealth to their survivors. (hence more tax money for the 

government also.) 

Instead of requiring the lifetime annuity, you should require FULL 

DISCLOSURE, so that people can make choices that best suit them and 

their survivors. 

Thanks.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBC) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I Tony J. Sorcic, President & Chief Executive Officer of
PNBC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
         financial condition and result of operations of PNBC.
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ __Tony J. Sorcic_____________________________________________ Tony J. Sorcic President & Chief Executive Officer

November 7, 2003

---
§ 350.409 What response will an applicant receive under the High Priority Program? ( a ) *Approval.* If FMCSA awards a grant or cooperative agreement, the applicant will receive a grant agreement to execute.
( b ) *Denial.* If FMCSA denies the grant or cooperative agreement, the applicant will receive a notice of denial.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

February 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129754 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129754 

 COA: 262639 

Genesee CC: 04-014222-FH 

IAN DOUGLAS MACDONALD, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 6, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would hold this case in abeyance for People v Drohan, lv gtd 472 Mich 

881 (2005). 

p0221 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 27, 2006 

Clerk
Nox 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 EngineRun 0Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4Run 5 Run 6Run 7 Run 8Run 9 Run 10 Engine 1 8.714 9.233 10.472 Engine 2 8.294 9.033 10.228 Engine 3 7.404 8.286 8.362 Engine 4 9.576 10.532 10.554 Engine 5 9.235 9.921 11.713 Confidence68 95 99.7 Engine 6 8.578 9.96 11.106 AverageStd Dev 1 2 3 Engine 7 8.189 8.184 8.417 8.50 0.690 9.19 9.88 10.57 Engine 8 8.009 9.376 10.518 9.74 1.083 10.83 11.91 21.19 Average 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 9.74 9.74 9.74 9.74 9.74 9.74 9.74 1 Std Dev 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 10.83 10.83 10.83 10.83 10.83 10.83 10.83 2 Std Dev 9.88 9.88 9.88 9.88 11.91 11.91 11.91 11.91 11.91 11.91 11.91 BACT 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 Permit 1 8.6 8.60 8.60 8.60 8.60 8.60 8.60 8.60 8.60 8.60 8.60 Ave+15% 9.77 9.77 9.77 9.77 11.20 11.20 11.20 11.20 11.20 11.20 11.20

8.50 9.74

9.19 10.83

9.88 11.91 12.3 12.3

8.6 9.77 11.20

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 g/kW-hr 

# NOx Scatter Plot-Stack Testing Results

Engine 1 Engine 2 Engine 3 Engine 4 Engine 5 Engine 6 Engine 7 Engine 8 Average 1 Std Dev 2 Std Dev BACT Permit 1 Ave+15% 

## Low(30%) Med(45%) High(60%)
Editorial Note on Part 387
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 387 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 387.403 General requirements. ( a ) *Cargo.* A household goods freight forwarder may not operate until it has filed with FMCSA an appropriate surety bond, certificate of insurance, qualifications as a self-insurer, or other securities or agreements, in the amounts prescribed at § 387.405, for loss of or damage to household goods.
( b ) *Public liability.* A freight forwarder may not perform transfer, collection, or delivery service until it has filed with the FMCSA an appropriate surety bond, certificate of insurance, qualifications as a self-insurer, or other securities or agreements, in the amounts prescribed at § 387.405, conditioned to pay any final judgment recovered against such freight forwarder for bodily injury to or the death of any person, or loss of or damage to property (except cargo) of others, or, in the case of freight vehicles described at § 387.303(b)(2), for environmental restoration, resulting from the negligent operation, maintenance, or use of motor vehicles operated by or under its control in performing such service.
( c ) *Surety bond or trust fund.* A freight forwarder must have a surety bond or trust fund in effect. The FMCSA will not issue a freight forwarder license until a surety bond or trust fund for the full limit of liability prescribed in § 387.405 is in effect. The freight forwarder license shall remain valid or effective only as long as a surety bond or trust fund remains in effect and ensures the financial responsibility of the freight forwarder. The requirements applicable to property broker surety bonds and trust funds in § 387.307 shall apply to the surety bond or trust fund required by this paragraph.
[80 FR 63709, Oct. 21, 2015] Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 82 FR 5310, Jan. 17, 2017, § 387.403 was suspended, effective Jan. 14, 2017.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 12-1171 September Term, 2012

DHS-10-TSA-0077

Filed On: June 14, 2013

Suburban Air Freight, Inc.,

Petitioner

v.

Transportation Security Administration,

Respondent

BEFORE: Henderson, Rogers, and Tatel, Circuit Judges

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the court’s order to show cause filed June 7, 2013, and

the responses thereto, it is

ORDERED that the order to show cause be discharged. It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that the sealed opinion filed June 7, 2013, be unsealed. 

The Clerk is directed to unseal the opinion and release it publicly. 

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Jennifer M. Clark 

Deputy Clerk
§ 625.17 State of good repair principles. ( a ) A capital asset is in a state of good repair if it is in a condition sufficient for the asset to operate at a full level of performance. In determining whether a capital asset is in a state of good repair, a provider must consider the state of good repair standards under subpart D of this part.
( b ) An individual capital asset may operate at a full level of performance regardless of whether or not other capital assets within a public transportation system are in a state of good repair.
( c ) A provider's Accountable Executive must balance transit asset management, safety, day-to-day operations, and expansion needs in approving and carrying out a TAM plan and a public transportation agency safety plan.
§ 580.8 Odometer disclosure statement retention. ( a ) Dealers and distributors of motor vehicles who are required by this part to execute an odometer disclosure statement shall retain, except as noted in paragraph (d), for five years a photostat, carbon, other facsimile copy, or electronic copy of each odometer mileage statement, which they issue and receive. They shall retain all odometer disclosure statements at their primary place of business in an order appropriate to business requirements and that permits systematic retrieval. Electronic copies shall be retained in a format which cannot be altered and which indicates any attempts to alter it.
( b ) Lessors shall retain, for five years following the date they transfer ownership of the leased vehicle, each written or electronic odometer disclosure statement which they receive from a lessee. They shall retain all odometer disclosure statements at their primary place of business in an order that is appropriate to business requirements and that permits systematic retrieval. Electronic copies shall be retained in a format which cannot be altered and which indicates any attempts to alter it.
( c ) Dealers and distributors of motor vehicles who are granted a power of attorney, except as noted in paragraph (d) of this section, by their transferor pursuant to § 580.13, or by their transferee pursuant to § 580.14, shall retain for five years a photostat, carbon, or other facsimile copy, or electronic copy of each power of attorney they receive. They shall retain all powers of attorney at their primary place of business in an order that is appropriate to business requirements and that permits systematic retrieval. Electronic copies shall be retained in a format which cannot be altered and which indicates any unauthorized attempts to alter it.
( d ) Any odometer disclosure statement made on an electronic title or electronic power of attorney shall be retained by the jurisdiction for a minimum of five years and made available upon request to dealers, distributors, and lessors for retrieval at their principal place of business and inspection on demand by law enforcement officials. Dealers, distributors, and lessors are not required to, but may, retain a copy of an odometer disclosure statement made on an electronic title or electronic power of attorney.
[84 FR 52702, Oct. 2, 2019]
Editorial Note on Part 572
Editorial Notes: 1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 572.74 Thorax assembly and test procedure. ( a ) *Thorax assembly.* The thorax consists of the part of the torso assembly designated as SA 106C 030 on drawing SA 106C 001, sheet 2, Revision A, and conforms to each applicable drawing on SA 106C 001 sheet 10, Revision C (including Drawing number 6C-1610-1 thru -4, Revision A, titled “Screw Button Head Socket”, dated September 30, 1996, and Drawing number 6C-1021, Revision B, titled “Ballast, 6 Yr. Thoraxc (for 7267A)”, dated September 24, 1996), and sheet 11, Revision D (including Drawing number SA 6C-909, Revision A, titled “Cover-chest Accelerometer”, dated September 21, 1996, and Drawing number 6C-1000-1, Revision C, titled “Sternum Thoracic Weld Ass'y.”, dated September 24, 1996).
( b ) *Thorax assembly requirements.* When the thorax is impacted by a test probe conforming to § 572.77(a) to 20 ±0.3 fps according to the test procedure in paragraph (c) of this section, the peak resultant accelerations at the accelerometers mounted in the chest cavity according to § 572.77(c) shall not be less than 43g and not more than 53g. ( 1 ) The recorded acceleration-time curve for this test shall be unimodal at or above the 30g level, and shall lie at or above that level for an interval not less than 4 milliseconds and not more than 6 milliseconds.
( 2 ) The lateral accelerations shall not exceed 5g.
( c ) *Thorax test procedure.* The test procedure for the thorax is as follows: ( 1 ) Seat and orient the dummy on a seating surface without back support as specified in § 572.78(c), and adjust the joints of the limbs at any setting (between 1g and 2g) which just supports the limbs' weight when the limbs are extended horizontally and forward, parallel to the midsagittal plane.
( 2 ) Establish the impact point at the chest midsagittal plane so that the impact point is 2.25 inches below the longitudinal center of the clavicle retainer screw, and adjust the dummy so that the plane that bisects the No. 3 rib into upper and lower halves is horizontal ±1 degree.
( 3 ) Place the longitudinal center line of the test probe so that it coincides with the designated impact point, and align the test probe so that at impact, the probe's longitudinal center line coincides (within 2 degrees) with the line formed at the intersection of the horizontal and midsagittal planes and passing through the designated impact point.
( 4 ) Impact the thorax with the test probe so that at the moment of contact the probe's longitudinal center line falls within 2 degrees of a horizontal line in the dummy's midsagittal plane.
( 5 ) Guide the test probe during impact so that there is no significant lateral, vertical, or rotational movement.
( 6 ) Allow at least 30 minutes between successive tests.
[56 FR 57836, Nov. 14, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 2897, Jan. 12, 1995, 62 FR 44227, Aug. 20, 1997]
§ 371.9 Rebating and compensation. ( a ) A broker shall not charge or receive compensation from a motor carrier for brokerage service where: ( 1 ) The broker owns or has a material beneficial interest in the shipment or
( 2 ) The broker is able to exercise control over the shipment because the broker owns the shipper, the shipper owns the broker, or there is common ownership of the two.
( b ) A broker shall not give or offer to give anything of value to any shipper, consignor or consignee (or their officers or employees) except inexpensive advertising items given for promotional purposes.
exv10w8



 





Exhibit 10.8: Non-Employee Director Compensation (effective January 2, 2006)




Annual Retainer




	 	 	 	 	 
	Service as Director
	 	$	9,000	 
	Service as Chairman of the Board*
	 	$	9,000	 
	Service as Audit Committee Co-Chairman*
	 	$	1,750	 
	Service as Loan Committee Chairman*
	 	$	3,500	 
	Service as ALCO Committee Chairman*
	 	$	3,500	 
	Service as Compensation Committee Chairman*
	 	$	3,500	 








 




			
	*	 	Chairman fees are in addition to the annual retainer and monthly fees received by all
non-employee directors.





Monthly Fees




	 	 	 	 	 
	Directors
	 	$	1,000	 
	Chairman Emeritus
	 	$	250	 





Equity Compensation



Each non-employee director, including the Chairman Emeritus is also eligible to receive
non-qualified stock option awards pursuant to the Alliance Bankshares Corporation Stock Option
Plan, in the discretion of the Compensation Committee.



On December 30, 2005, each non-employee director received a non-qualified stock option to purchase
5,000 common shares at $16.10 per share. The options vest over four years, with the first 15%
vesting on December 30, 2006.