alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 235

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the

establishment of a National Words Can Heal Day.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 10, 2001

Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the establishment of a National Words Can Heal

Day.

Whereas words used unfairly, whether expressed through excessive anger, unfair criticism, public and private humiliation, bigoted comments, cruel jokes, or rumors and malicious gossip, can traumatize and damage many lives;

Whereas an unwillingness or inability of many parents to

control what they say when angry causes the infliction of

potentially damaging verbal abuse on many children;

Whereas bigoted words are often used to dehumanize entire

religious, racial, and ethnic groups, and can inflame hostility;
2

•HRES 235 IH

Whereas the spreading of negative and often unfair, untrue,

or exaggerated comments or rumors about others often

inflicts irrevocable damage on the victim of such rumors;

Whereas the establishment of a National Words Can Heal

Day would raise awareness regarding the damage that

can be caused by destructive language; and

Whereas September 10, 2001, would be an appropriate day

to establish as National Words Can Heal Day: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that—

3 (1) a National Words Can Heal Day should be

4 established; and

5 (2) the President should issue a proclamation

6 calling on the people of the United States to observe

7 such a day with appropriate programs and activities.

Æ
§ 665.23 Fees. ( a ) The operator shall charge fees in accordance with a schedule approved by FTA, which shall include different fees for partial testing.
( b ) Fees shall be prorated for a vehicle withdrawn from the Bus Testing Facility before the completion of testing.
( c ) The manufacturer's portion of the test fee shall be used first during the conduct of testing. The operator of the Bus Testing Facility shall obtain approval from FTA prior to continuing testing of each bus model at the Bus testing program's expense after the manufacturer's fee has been expended.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23-A

                                     CONSENT


                  As independent petroleum and natural gas consultants, we
hereby consent to the filing of this Letter Report dated January 24, 2000 in its
entirety as an Exhibit to the 1999 Annual Report of Columbia Energy Group, to
the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K, and any Registration
Statement of Columbia Energy Group, relating to the issue of securities to the
public during 2000; to the quotation or summarization of portions of this Letter
Report, subject to our approval of the related page(s) of the document(s), in
the 10-K, the Prospectus included in said Registration Statement(s) or the 1999
annual Report to Stockholders; and, subject to approval of the related page(s)
of the document(s), to the use of our name and the reliance upon our authority
as experts in said Annual Report to Stockholders, Form 10-K and Prospectus(es).
We have no interest of a substantial or material nature in Columbia Energy
Group, or in any affiliate, nor are we to receive any such interest as payment
for the preparation of this Letter Report; we have not been employed for such
preparation on a contingent fee basis; and we are not connected with Columbia
Energy Group, or any affiliate as a promoter, underwriter, voting trustee,
director, officer, employee, or affiliate.





                                          RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.


Houston, Texas
January 24, 2000
1210-AB32-2-1595.html[7/26/2015 8:44:21 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jxw-pdrt

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2092

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Janis Chester

General Comment

Clarification and simplification of existing products would suffice.
SERVED: APRIL 8, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF TRIUMPH ACCESSORY SERVICES DOCKETNO. FAA-2015-0636 (Civil Penalty Action)
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING ,!
..... ;

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2014CE070023) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAAHearing Docket, andthe other persons on the attached Service Lis ......---·--·----

Attachment

- Service List

### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1 

### ONE COPY Jeffry D. Frisby, President and CEO DocketNo. FAA-2015-0636 (Civil Penalty Action)

Triumph Group Operations, Inc. d/b/a TriumphAccessory Services, Respondent 

### 899 Cassatt Road, Suite 210 Berwyn, PA 19312 Marshall S. Filler, Respondent's Counsel 

### Obadal, Filler, MacLeod & 

### Klein, P.L.C. 117 North Henry Street Alexandria, VA22314-2903 TEL: 703-299-0784 FAX: 703-299-0254 Mark G. Camacho, Complainant's Counsel 

### Federal Aviation Administration Office ofRegional Counsel, Central Region, ACE-7 901 Locust, Room 506 Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 TEL: 816-329-3765 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative Law Judge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Wednesday, August 30, 2023, at 10:30 a.m.

# PLACE: 

Hybrid meeting: 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC (12th floor) and virtual.

# Note:

                         For those attending the meeting in person, current COVID-19 safety protocols for visitors, which are based on the CDC COVID-19 hospital admission level in Washington, DC, will be updated on the Commission's contact page by the Monday before the meeting. See the contact page at                         *https://www.fec.gov/​contact/​.*                         If you would like to virtually access the meeting, see the instructions below.                    

# STATUS: 

                        This meeting will be open to the public, subject to the above-referenced guidance regarding the COVID-19 hospital admission level and corresponding health and safety procedures. To access the meeting virtually, go to the Commission's website                         *www.fec.gov*                         and click on the banner to be taken to the meeting page.                    

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Proposed Final Audit Report on the Communications Workers of America—COPE Political Contributions Committee (A21-09)

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on Steve Daines for Montana (A21-04)

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on Citizens for Waters (A21-01)

Management and Administrative Matters

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

                        Individuals who plan to attend in person and who require special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Laura E. Sinram, Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-1040 or                         *secretary@fec.gov,*                         at least 72 hours prior to the meeting date.                    

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Laura E. Sinram,

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2023-17970 Filed 8-16-23; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
Exhibit 34.1


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of The Ohio Edison Company:





We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying “Report on assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria for Asset-Backed Securities”, that The Ohio Edison Company (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the asset-backed securities transactions for which the Company acted as servicer involving phase-in recovery property (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2013 and for the period from June 20, 2013 to December 31, 2013, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(i-iv), 1122(d)(2)(i-vii), 1122(d)(3)(ii-iv), and 1122(d)(4)(i-v, vii, ix-xiii, xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform or the servicing activities are applicable to the Platform but are excluded from the scope of management's assertion and are not reported on herein.  Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.





Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.





In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2013 and for the period from June 20, 2013 to December 31, 2013 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.








/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP








March 31, 2014
**EXHIBIT
      21**






Certain
      Subsidiaries of PNM Resources, Inc.






As
      of
      December 31, 2005, PNM Resources, Inc. directly or indirectly owns all of the
      voting securities of the following "significant subsidiaries" (as defined in
      Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X):




Public
      Service Company of New Mexico, a New Mexico corporation that does business
      under
      the names “Public Service Company of New Mexico” and “PNM”.




Texas-New
      Mexico Power Company, a Texas corporation that does business under the name
      Texas-New Mexico Power Company.




First
      Choice Power Special Purpose, LP, a Texas limited partnership that does business
      under its partnership name.




First
      Choice Power, LP, a Texas limited partnership that does business under its
      partnership name.




FCP
      Enterprises Inc., a Delaware corporation that does business under its corporate
      name.




TNP
      Enterprises, Inc., a Texas corporation that does business under its corporate
      name.




The
      remaining subsidiaries of PNM Resources, Inc. considered in the aggregate as
      a
      single subsidiary, do not constitute a "significant subsidiary" as of the end
      of
      the year covered by this report.
----

(2004/C 84 E/0359)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0133/04

by Rosa Miguélez Ramos (PSE) to the Commission

(20 January 2004)

Subject:   Fishery control agency in Vigo

On 13 December 2003 the European Council decided to set up a fishery control agency with its headquarters in Vigo.

Is the Commission already working on a proposal for a regulation which will provide the requisite legal basis for this Agency? What powers and resources will the Agency have?

Has the Commission already begun to draw up the economic study for the way the Agency will operate?

When, approximately does the Commission believe the Agency will begin operations in Vigo?

How many Community officials and temporary agents, and of what categories, will be working for it? How many local agents, in addition to the statutory staff, does the Commission calculate it will employ?

Has the Commission begun to look for a building in Vigo to accommodate the Agency? Have the Spanish authorities made the Commission any offer in this connection? If so, what are the details?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(12 February 2004)

The Commission welcomes the conclusion reached by the Member States at the Heads of State and Government meeting on 13 December 2003 in Brussels regarding the establishment of a European fisheries control agency, whose headquarters will be in Spain.

According to the information at the Commission's disposal, it would seem that the Spanish Government wishes the agency to be located in the city of Vigo in Galicia.

In March 2004 the Commission will present a proposal to the Council and to Parliament for a Regulation setting up the Community fisheries control agency. The proposal will include the agency's budget, with detailed information on its staff numbers and their grades.

A study which the Commission asked to be undertaken in 2003 will evaluate the agency's operating procedures.

Once established, the agency will progressively assume its functions. The agency's location will in any case be the subject of an agreement between it and the Spanish authorities, to be concluded after the agency's management board has been set up and its director appointed.

----
#### § 800.26 Delegation to the Chief, Public Inquiries Branch.

The Board delegates to the Chief, Public Inquiries Branch, the authority to determine, initially, the withholding of a Board record from inspection or copying, pursuant to part 801 of this chapter.

[63 FR 71606, Dec. 29, 1998, as amended at 81 FR 75731, Nov. 1, 2016]
1210-AB32-2-1593.html[7/26/2015 8:44:22 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jxw-ljx3

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2090

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Janice Poore

General Comment

You've already screwed up the healthcare system. STAY out of my 401k/IRA!
ACCEPTED

01-15-00694-cv

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

8/27/2015 12:24:38 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/27/2015 12:24:38 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
#### § 29.510 Must a Tribe maintain a recordkeeping system?

A Tribe must maintain records and provide Federal agency access to those records as provided in 25 U.S.C. 5386(d) and the statutory requirements of the funds included in a funding agreement.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsApplication and flight test of linearizing transformations using measurement feedback to the nonlinear control problemThe design of nonlinear controllers has relied on the use of detailed aerodynamic and engine models that must be associated with the control law in the flight system implementation. Many of these controllers were applied to vehicle flight path control problems and have attempted to combine both inner- and outer-loop control functions in a single controller. An approach to the nonlinear trajectory control problem is presented. This approach uses linearizing transformations with measurement feedback to eliminate the need for detailed aircraft models in outer-loop control applications. By applying this approach and separating the inner-loop and outer-loop functions two things were achieved: (1) the need for incorporating detailed aerodynamic models in the controller is obviated; and (2) the controller is more easily incorporated into existing aircraft flight control systems. An implementation of the controller is discussed, and this controller is tested on a six degree-of-freedom F-15 simulation and in flight on an F-15 aircraft. Simulation data are presented which validates this approach over a large portion of the F-15 flight envelope. Proof of this concept is provided by flight-test data that closely matches simulation results. Flight-test data are also presented.Document ID19910020840Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsAntoniewicz, Robert F.*(NASA  Hugh L. Dryden Flight Research Center Edwards, CA., United States)*Duke, Eugene L.*(NASA  Hugh L. Dryden Flight Research Center Edwards, CA., United States)*Menon, P. K. A.*(Georgia Inst. of Tech. Atlanta., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1991Subject CategoryAircraft Stability And ControlReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:3154NASA-TP-3154H-1629Accession Number91N30154Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-60-21Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910020840.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# Coalition engineers erect steel bridge in Raqqah

/ Published Jan. 4, 2018

Jan. 4, 2018

Release # 20180104-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**SOUTHWEST ASIA –** A Coalition team working with Syrian partners erected a steel bridge in only 16 hours on Dec. 27, 2017, near the village of Hawi al-Hawa, west of Raqqah Province, Syria.

Engineers attached to the Special Operations Joint Task Force - Operation Inherent Resolve led the effort, which allows the Raqqah Internal Security Force to provide security to the people of Raqqah and facilitates greater humanitarian assistance and relief efforts there.

“The bridge provides much needed access to parts of Raqqah following the destruction to critical infrastructure caused by Daesh,” said the SOJTF-OIR Commanding General, Maj. Gen. James Jarrard. “The bridge will enable the Raqqah Civil Council to increase required humanitarian assistance efforts and will improve vital access by Improvised Explosive Device experts working to reduce threats to citizens.”

Construction of this bridge is a welcome sight to Raqqawis, who were liberated from more than three years of Daesh’s brutality in October 2017. Since then, Raqqawis have taken on governance of their city through the Raqqah Civil Council, which leads recovery and security efforts and is supported by international aid organizations.

“The growing confidence of the Raqqawi population in their ability to return to normalcy is palpable, and the Coalition is proud to stand side-by-side with the RCC in supporting these efforts,” Jarrard said.

Coalition forces continue to train and support the Raqqah Internal Security Force as they ensure security and aid efforts that support citizens.

Note: High resolution images found at:

Engineers attached to the Special Operations Joint Task Force – Operation Inherent Resolve erected a bridge over the Euphrates River Dec. 27 in the Raqqah district, Syria. (Photo by Special Operations Joint Task Force - Operation Inherent Resolve)

-30-
Order entered December 4, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00548
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF S .V., A CHILD On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 04
- 11968
- V



### O RDER The reporter’s record is overdue. The record before this Court contains appellant’s Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs or an Appeal Bond filed in the trial court. Accordingly , appellant is allowed to proceed without advance payment of costs. See T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 145(a). We ORDER Ms. Finkley to file the reporter’s record WITHIN THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. /s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE