alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

Written Statement of
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of WidePoint
Corporation (the Company), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 ( the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ STEVE L. KOMAR Steve L.
KomarChief Executive Officer

/s/ JAMES T. MCCUBBIN James T.
McCubbinChief Financial Officer

Date: August 14, 2006
----

(2004/C 84 E/0622)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0194/04

by Avril Doyle (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(29 January 2004)

Subject:   Flight and duty time limitations for airline pilots

While being committed to the cause of aviation safety, and a supporter of the goal to harmonise flight and duty time limitations (FTL) within the EU, some criticism of the current proposals governing FTL has come to my attention.

In light of this criticism, what plans does the Commission have to get the Simpson proposals independently assessed on a medical/scientific basis?

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(2 March 2004)

The Commission finalised on 10 February 2004 an amended proposal for a Regulation amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91 on the harmonisation of technical requirements and administrative procedures in the field of civil aviation (1). This new proposal integrates, under Annex III, Subpart Q, the Flight Time Limitation scheme proposed by the Parliament (2). In addition, the Commission proposes to add a new article to Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91 (3) introducing a revision of the aforementioned Subpart Q based on a scientific and medical evaluation of its provisions to be carried out by the European Aviation Safety Agency.

After the future extension of the European Aviation Safety Agency's (EASA) tasks to air operations, as provided by Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 (4), the Commission will require EASA to proceed to this scientific and medical assessment.

----

(1)OJ C 311 E, 31.10.2000, as modified by the amended proposal presented by the Commission pursuant to Article 250 (2) of the EC Treaty, OJ C 227 E, 24.9.2002.

(2)  Report No A5-0263/2002 of 10.7.2002.

(3)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91 of 16 December 1991 on the harmonisation of technical requirements and administrative procedures in the field of civil aviation, OJ L 373, 31.12.1991.

(4)  Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 of the Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2002 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency, OJ L 240, 7.9.2002.

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated:  May 7, 2008
    /s/ Eugene B. Shepherd, Jr.Eugene B. Shepherd, Jr.Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         525,380
<SECURITIES>                                    87,583
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,481
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (14,558)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               614,652
<PP&E>                                         509,268
<DEPRECIATION>                                (83,331)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,076,030
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          212,595
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     3,144,102
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     50,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,330,667)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,076,030
<SALES>                                         77,250
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               122,695
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  315,726
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (193,031)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (193,031)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  13,586
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 84,077
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (95,368)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TOMMY BENNY SUDIARTATE, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 19-72585 

Agency No. A096-499-646 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges. 

Tommy Benny Sudiartate, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to 

reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We 

review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Mohammed v. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

OCT 14 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-72585 

Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Sudiartate’s motion to 

reopen as untimely, where the motion was filed more than seven years after the 

final order of removal, and where Sudiartate failed to demonstrate a material 

change in country conditions in Indonesia to qualify for the regulatory exception to 

the time limitation for filing a motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), 

(3)(ii); Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 990-91 (9th Cir. 2010) (BIA did not 

abuse its discretion in denying motion to reopen where petitioner failed to submit 

material evidence of qualitatively different country conditions).

Sudiartate’s motion to take judicial notice is denied. See Fisher v. INS, 79 

F.3d 955, 963-64 (9th Cir. 1996) (en banc) (court’s review is limited to the 

administrative record).

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the 

mandate. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 22, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 57174]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18006]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

[OCC Charter Number 703519]


Home Federal Savings and Loan Association of Grand Island, Grand 
Island, Nebraska; Approval of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on August 14, 2023, the Office of the 
Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) approved the application of Home 
Federal Savings and Loan Association of Grand Island, Grand Island, 
Nebraska, to convert to the stock form of organization. Copies of the 
application are available on the OCC website at the FOIA Reading Room 
(https://foia-pal.occ.gov/palMain.aspx) under Mutual to Stock 
Conversion Applications. If you have any questions, please contact 
Licensing Activities at (202) 649-6260.

(Authority: 12 CFR 192.205).

    Dated: August 14, 2023.

    By the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
Stephen A. Lybarger,
Deputy Comptroller for Licensing.
[FR Doc. 2023-18006 Filed 8-21-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-33-P
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 11-205A 

________________________________________________________________________ 

ARMS LIMITATION 

 Annexes to Protocol of Treaty Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the RUSSIAN FEDERATION 

Signed at Prague April 8, 2010 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 RUSSIAN FEDERATION 

 Arms Limitation 

Annexes to protocol of treaty signed at Prague April 8, 2010. 

Treaty with protocol and annexes transmitted by the President 

 of the United States of America 

 to the Senate May 13, 2010 (Treaty Doc. 111-5, 

 111th Congress, 2d Session); 

Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 September 16, 2010 (Senate Executive Report No. 111-6, 

 111th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 December 22, 2010; 

Ratified by the President February 2, 2011; 

Exchange of Instruments of Ratification at 

 Munich February 5, 2011; 

Entered into force February 5, 2011. 

NOTE: This publication adds annexes to TIAS 11-205.
## WASHOE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT ENHANCING QUALITY OF LIFE

July 1, 2016 Meredith Kurpius Manager, Air Quality Analysis Office U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency, Region IX 7 5 Hawthorne Street, AIR-7 SanFrancisco, CA 94105 Subject: 2016 Annual NetworkPlan DearMs
. Kurpius: Enclosed is the "Washoe County Health District, Air Quality Management Division 2016 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan". This plan was prepared in accordance with 40 CFR 58.10 and was available for public inspection from June 1 to June 30, 2016 at the Washoe County Health District, Air Quality Management Division (AQMD) website (OurCleanAir.com). A hardcopy of the plan was also available at the AQMD office. No public comments were received during the public inspectionperiod. Feel free to contact Mr. Craig Petersen or me at (775) 784-7200 if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, 

# J)~~ Daniel Inouye Monitoring and Planning Branch Chief Attachments
cc: AnnaMebust, EPA Region IX Craig Petersen, AQMD

AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT l 001 East Ninth Street I P.O

. Box 11130 I Reno, Nevada 89520 AQM Office: 775-784-7200 I Fax: 775-784-7225 I washoecounty.us/health Serving Reno, Sparks and all ofWashoe County, Nevada. Washoe County is an Equal Opportunity Employer. PublicHealth f'r•~' " ' · froma ,,- I f(ll~c.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of FirstEnergy Corp., Ohio Edison Company,
The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company and The Toledo Edison Company on
Form 10-K/A, as amended, for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
undersigned officer of each of the Companies does hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoPTEd pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                                     /s/H. Peter Burg
                                              ----------------------------------
                                                        H. Peter Burg
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                                        August 18, 2003


                                                     /s/Richard H. Marsh
                                              ----------------------------------
                                                        Richard H. Marsh
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
                                                        August 18, 2003

                                       61
Attorneys at Law

311 South Wacker Drive

Suite 3000

Chicago, Ilinois

60606.6677

Tel 312.360.6000

Michael F. Tomasek

Partner

Direct 312.360.6538

Fax 312.360.6596

mtomasek~

freehornpeters.com

Cbicago

SpriiglieJd

Freeborn & Peters LLP

Februar 3, 2011

VIA EMAIL (E-ORICínoL.GOv) THEN U.S. MAIL 

Office of Regulations and Interpretations, Employee Benefits

Security Administration

Attn: Definition of Fiduciar Proposed Rule

RoomN-5655

U.S. Deparment of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

Re: Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule

Dear Sir or Madam:

I have the following comment on the proposed rule related to the definition of

fiduciary:

Proposed DOL Reg. § 2510.3-21(c)(5) provides that a person who is a fiduciary by

reason of rendering investment advice for a fee shall not be deemed to be a fiduciar

regarding any assets of the plan with respect to which such person does not have any

discretionary authority, discretionar control or discretionary responsibilty and does

not exercise any authority or control.

Quite often, an individual will recommend an investment option to a plan committee

which wil then vote whether to accept such recommendation. The recommending

individual has no vote. In light of the above, it appears that the recommending

individual can take the position that he or she has not acted as a fiduciar because it

is the committee that has ultimate authority, control and responsibility. Is this the

case?

Than you for your consideration of the above.

Very Truly Yours, ~~ff~

Michael F. Tomasek

MFT/mk
§ 611.103 Applicability. ( a ) This part applies to all proposals for Federal major capital investment funds under 49 U.S.C. 5309 for new fixed guideways, extensions to fixed guideways, and corridor-based bus rapid transit systems.
( b ) This part does not apply to projects for which an FFGA or PCGA has already been executed, or to projects that have been approved into final design or project development unless the project sponsor requests to be covered by this part. The regulations in existence prior to the effective date of this rule will continue to apply to projects for which an FFGA or PCGA has already been executed and to projects approved into final design or project development unless a project sponsor requests to be covered by this part. New Starts projects approved for entry into final design shall be considered to be in the engineering phase of the New Starts process.
( c ) A New Starts project which has been approved for entry into preliminary engineering under the regulations in existence prior to the effective date of this rule shall be considered to be in the engineering phase of the New Starts process. For the purpose of completing engineering, the regulations in existence prior to the effective date of this rule will continue to apply to a New Starts project approved into preliminary engineering until such time as the sponsor requests an FFGA unless the project sponsor requests to be covered by this part prior to an FFGA.
H. Res. 171

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 20, 2001.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2216) making supplemental appropriations for

the fiscal year ending September 30, 2001, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with.

All points of order against consideration of the bill are

waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall

not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on

Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The amendment printed in part A of the report of the Committee on

Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as

adopted in the House and in the Committee of the Whole.

Points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, for

failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived. The
2

•HRES 171 EH

amendment printed in part B of the report of the Committee

on Rules may be offered only by a Member designated in the

report and only at the appropriate point in the reading of the

bill, shall be considered as read, shall not be subject to

amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division

of the question in the House or in the Committee of the

Whole. All points of order against the amendment printed in

part B of the report are waived. During consideration of the

bill for further amendment, the Chairman of the Committee

on the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis

of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it

to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. During consideration of the bill, as amended, points of order against

amendments for failure to comply with clause 2(e) of rule

XXI are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill

for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill,

as amended, to the House with such further amendments as

may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to
3

•HRES 171 EH

final passage without intervening motion except one motion

to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 585.34 Definitions. ( a ) All terms defined in 49 U.S.C. 30102 are used in their statutory meaning.
( b ) Bus, gross vehicle weight rating or GVWR, multipurpose passenger vehicle, passenger car, and truck are used as defined in § 571.3 of this chapter.
( c ) Production year means the 12-month period between September 1 of one year and August 31 of the following year, inclusive.
( d ) Limited line manufacturer means a manufacturer that sells three or fewer carlines, as that term is defined in 49 CFR 583.4, in the United States during a production year.
# CENTCOM Month in Review: The Fight Against ISIS in Iraq and Syria

/ Published Feb. 2, 2023

Feb. 2, 2023

Release Number 20230202-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla.**–During the month of January 2023 U.S. Central Command-led coalition forces and partner forces conducted 43 operations against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. These operations degraded ISIS and removed multiple senior ISIS militants from the battlefield, including the Emir of Raqqa anda Syrian provincial media and security operative. These successful operations are part of the mission to ensure the enduring defeat of ISIS.

Coalition member nations remain focused on degrading ISIS capabilities and restoring stability to the region. It is an effort that can only be accomplished by, with, and through our coalition partners.

“While our efforts have degraded ISIS, the group’s vile ideology remains uncontained and unconstrained,” said Gen. Michael "Erik" Kurilla, commander of CENTCOM. “ISIS continues to represent a threat to not only Iraq and Syria, but to the stability and security of the region. Therefore, we must continue the fight against ISIS alongside our partners.”

The following is a summary of the D-ISIS operations for January 2023:

For the month of January 2023, the CENTCOM-led coalition conducted a total of**43 D-ISIS operations**, resulting in**11 ISIS operatives killed**and**227 detained**.

In Iraq:                                                                          

33 partnered operations                                              

No U.S.-only operations                                              

29 ISIS operatives detained                                           

9 ISIS operatives killed                                                  

In Syria:

10 partnered operations

No U.S.-only operations

198 ISIS operatives detained

2 ISIS operatives killed

These operations were conducted under the authority of the CENTCOM commander who retains authority for operations against ISIS in Iraq and Syria, and under the command of Combined Joint Task Force – Operation Inherent Resolve. No U.S. forces were injured or killed in these operations. Our local partners – the Syrian Democratic Forces and the Iraqi Security Forces – play a critical role in this fight.

“We rely heavily on the Syrian Democratic Forces for the fight against ISIS,” Kurilla said. “Meanwhile, our Iraqi Security Forces have been aggressively taking the fight to ISIS in Iraq.”

“We commend the competence, professionalism, and dedication of our Iraqi, Syrian, and coalition partner forces,” said Maj. Gen. Matthew McFarlane, CJTF-OIR commander. “Their unwavering efforts maintain steady pressure on the ISIS network. The U.S. remains committed to ensuring the lasting defeat of ISIS to preserve regional security and stability.”

On the second day of each month, CENTCOM will publish an accounting of operations against ISIS from the previous month. This is the first press release in that effort.

-30-