alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Roger Lavoie [mailto:nanlav@tqci.com] 

Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2015 1:15 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

I read with interest the article written by Michelle Singletary in the Washington Post Sunday, September 

13th 2015. I was a victim of what I consider to be unscrupulous tactics by an investment advisor. It all 

started when I visited my local SunTrust bank to buy a CD. I was advised to talk to their investment 

advisor to purchase “SunTrust index linked CD’s”. After discussing those CD’s I was given part of the 

documentation associated with terms and conditions. I thought I read the info carefully and decided to 

purchase the CD’s assuming that they were “SunTrust CD’s and not aware (until I received the rest of the 

info) that there would be a 3% charge for opening the CD. Needless to say I was shocked when I 

received the first statement. To make matters worst, it took about three or four visits and a 

confrontation with the investment broker/advisor for him to admit that the missing money from my 

account was in fact a service fee (which they called something else). I reported the issue to the 

appropriate government banking agency who forwarded the complaint to SunTrust whose only action 

was to respond by quoting the position of the investment broker/advisor.

 Roger Lavoie

 nanlav@tqci.com
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN
NO. 03-0 8 -00 710 -CR
Cha r le s Bi sho p , A ppe lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee
F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 403RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- DC-08 -20 3263 , HO NORAB LE DONALD LEO NARD , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N P ER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief was due in this Court on Marc h 2, 2009. On Marc h 27, 2009, we notified appe llant’s counsel that a ppellant’s brie f wa s overdu e an d t h at i f we did not rece ive a satisfac tor y re s p o n s e from counsel on or be fore April 6, 2009, a he aringbefor e the district cour t pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b) would be orde red. To da te, appe llant’s brief ha s not been filed,
no r h a ve we re c e ive d a

re sp on se fr om c ouns e l. We t he re fo re a bate the c a

us e and re mand it to the dis tr ic t court to h old a he ari ngin
acc ordanc e with rule 38.8 of the rules of

appellate proce dure. Te x . R. App. P
. 38.8(b)( 2), (3). The dis tr ic t c ourt

sh a ll h old

a he ari ngimm e diate ly

to d e te rm ine wh e the r a pp e lla nt s til l w ish e s to pr os e c ute his a

pp e a l, wh e the r a

pp e lla nt is i nd ig e nt, and

wh e the r c ouns e l ha s a

ba nd on e d th e a

pp e a l. Se e id
. I f a

pp e lla nt d e sir e s to a pp eal and is i nd ig e nt, the dis tr ic t c ourt sh ou ld m a ke a

pp ro pr ia te order s to ensure that appellant is adequately repr esente d on appea l. Se e id
. Fo l l o wi n g t h e h ea ri n g,2

the district court should orde r the a ppropriate supplementary cler k’s and r eporte r’s re cords to be prepa red a nd forwa rded to this Court no later than June 29, 2009. Se e id
.

Be fore J ustices Patterson, Pember ton and Waldrop Abated Filed: May

28, 2009 Do No t Pu

bli sh
#### § 553.19 Petitions for extension of time to comment.

A petition for extension of the time to submit comments must be received not later than 15 days before expiration of the time stated in the notice. The petitions must be submitted to: Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW, Washington, DC, 20590. It is requested, but not required, that 10 copies be submitted. The filing of the petition does not automatically extend the time for petitioner's comments. Such a petition is granted only if the petitioner shows good cause for the extension, and if the extension is consistent with the public interest. If an extension is granted, it is granted to all persons, and it is published in the Federal Register.
April 25: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL in Syria and Iraq
 By CJTF - Operation Inherent Resolve News Release
  April 25, 2015 Release # 20150425FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **SOUTHWEST ASIA -** Coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq between 8 a.m., April 24, and 8 a.m., April 25, local time.  In Syria, Coalition military forces conducted seven airstrikes using fighter and attack aircraft.  Separately in Iraq, Coalition military forces conducted 16 airstrikes approved by the Iraqi Ministry of Defense using fighter, attack and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL terrorists. "Coalition support remains steadfast as we work together with our partners to defeat Daesh," said Brig. Gen. Thomas Weidley, CJTF-OIR Chief of Staff. "These strikes support continuous incremental gains by Iraqi and Kurdish fighters that will combine over time to result in the demise of Daesh in Iraq and Syria." The following is a summary of the strikes conducted since the last press release: **Syria** * Near Al Hasakah, three airstrikes struck an ISIL fighting position, destroying an ISIL IED cache and an ISIL mortar position. * Near Kobani, four airstrikes struck four ISIL tactical units, destroying two ISIL boats. **Iraq** * Near Bayji, seven airstrikes struck four ISIL tactical units and an ISIL staging area, destroying four ISIL fighting positions, three ISIL vehicles, an ISIL VBIED and an ISIL warehouse. * Near Fallujah, four airstrikes struck four ISIL tactical units, destroying four ISIL vehicles and an ISIL heavy machine gun. * Near Kirkuk, an airstrike struck multiple ISIL fighting positions. * Near Mosul, an airstrike struck an ISIL armored vehicle. * Near Ramadi, an airstrike struck an ISIL large tactical unit, destroying two ISIL structures. * Near Sinjar, two airstrikes destroyed an ISIL fighting position and an ISIL engineer vehicle. Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely. The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria, the region, and the wider international community. The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Iraq include Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Syria include Bahrain, Canada, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and U.S.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Diet, mitochondria and multi-system regeneration and rejuvenation.                    

*Date:*                         October 18, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ivan Tadeu Rebustini, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, RM: 100, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 555-1212,                         *ivan.rebustini@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 16, 2023.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-17960 Filed 8-18-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Explanation of Calculations 

No. 1 Power Boiler 

Specifically for maximum 24 hour averages for NOx and PM = stack test values. 

Specifically for maximum 24 hour averages for SO2 = AP42 factors for bark (0.25 

lb/MMBTU + fuel oil usage at (157(%S)/1000), average %S for fuel oil of 2%, X the 

maximum day of oil usage. 

No. 2 Power Boiler 

Specifically for maximum 24 hour averages of NOx and SO2 = CEMS data. 

Specifically for maximum 24 hour averages of PM = stack test values and AP-42 factors 

X maximum day of coal burning and maximum day of bark burning in each calendar 

year. 

ASHDOWN-Q2-000018
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 103 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          May 21, 2002.
    Resolved,

SECTION 1. REFERRAL.

    Pursuant to section 1492 of title 28, United States Code, the bill (H.R. 
1258), entitled ``A bill for the relief of Sarabeth M. Davis, Robert S. Borders, 
Victor Maron, Irving Berke, and Adele E. Conrad'', now pending in the House of 
Representatives, is referred to the chief judge of the United States Court of 
Federal Claims.

SEC. 2. PROCEEDINGS AND REPORT.

    Upon receipt of the bill, the chief judge shall--
            (1) proceed under section 2509 of title 28, United States Code; and
            (2) report back to the House of Representatives, at the earliest 
        practicable date, providing--
                    (A) findings of fact and conclusions of law that are 
                sufficient to inform the Congress of the nature, extent, and 
                character of the claim for the compensation referred to in the 
                bill as a legal or equitable claim against the United States; 
                and
                    (B) the amount, if any, legally or equitably due from the 
                United States to the claimants.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### Margaret M. McConnell, Appellant, *v.*John F. McCullough et al., Respondents.

*McConnell*v. McCullough, 125 App. Div. 930, affirmed.

(Argued April 5, 1911;

decided April 25, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May 13, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action of ejectment.

*Andrew F. Van Thun, Jr.,*and *Walter G. Rooney*for appellant.

*William F. Clare amt Frederick A. Grill*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hisoock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 572
Editorial Notes: 1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 572.86 Test conditions and dummy adjustment. ( a ) With the complete torso on its back lying on a horizontal surface and the neck assembly mounted and shoulders on the edge of the surface, adjust the neck such that the head bolt is lowered 0.40 ±0.05 inches (10 ±1 mm) after a vertically applied load of 11.25 pounds (50 N) applied to the head bolt is released.
( b ) With the complete torso on its back with the adjusted neck assembly as specified in § 572.66(a), and lying on a horizontal surface with the shoulders on the edge of the surface, mount the head and tighten the head bolt and nut firmly, with the head in horizontal position. Adjust the head joint at the force between 1-2g, which just supports the head's weight.
( c ) Using the procedures described below, limb joints are set at the force between 1-2g, which just supports the limbs' weight when the limbs are extended horizontally forward: ( 1 ) With the complete torso lying with its front down on a horizontal surface, with the hip joint just over the edge of the surface, mount the upper leg and tighten hip joint nut firmly. Adjust the hip joint by releasing the hip joint nut until the upper leg just starts moving.
( 2 ) With the complete torso and upper leg lying with its front up on a horizontal surface, with the knee joint just over the edge of the surface, mount the lower leg and tighten knee joint firmly. Adjust the knee joint by releasing the knee joint nut until the lower leg just starts moving.
( 3 ) With the torso in an upright position, mount the upper arm and tighten firmly the adjustment bolts for the shoulder joint with the upper arm placed in a horizontal position. Adjust the shoulder joint by releasing the shoulder joint nut until the upper arm just starts moving.
( 4 ) With the complete torso in an upright position and upper arm in a vertical position, mount the forearm in a horizontal position and tighten the elbow hinge bolt and nut firmly. Adjust the elbow joint nut until the forearm just starts moving.
( d ) With the torso assembled in an upright position, the adjustment nut for the lumbar vertebrae is tightened until the spring is compressed to 2 ⁄ 3 of its unloaded length.
( e ) Performance tests are conducted at any temperature from 66 to 78 degrees F and at any relative humidity from 10 percent to 70 percent after exposure of the dummy to these conditions for a period of not less than four hours.
( f ) Performance tests of the same component, segment, assembly or fully assembled dummy are separated in time by a period of not less than 20 minutes unless otherwise specified.
( g ) Surfaces of the dummy components are not painted except as specified in the part or in drawings incorporated by this part.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hamptons Luxury Homes, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Roy Dalene, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Roy Dalene



Roy Dalene

Chief Executive Officer

September 12, 2005
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNonequilibrium in a low power arcjet nozzleEmission spectroscopy measurements were made of the plasma flow inside the nozzle of a 1 kW class arcjet thruster. The thruster propellant was a hydrogen-nitrogen mixture used to simulate fully decomposed hydrazine. The 0.25 mm diameter holes were drilled into the diverging section of the tungsten thruster nozzle to provide optical access to the internal flow. Atomic electron excitation, vibrational, and rotational temperatures were determined for the expanding plasma using relative line intensity techniques. The atomic excitation temperatures decreased from 18,000K at a location 3 mm downstream of the constrictor to 9,000K at a location 9 mm from the constrictor, while the molecular vibrational and rotational temperatures decreased from 6,500K to 2,500K and from 8,000K to 3,000K, respectively, between the same locations. The electron density measured using hydrogen H line Stark broadening decreased from about 10(exp 15) cm(-3) to about 2 times 10(exp 14) cm(-3) during the expansion. The results show that the plasma is highly nonequilibrium throughout the nozzle, with most relaxation times equal or exceeding the particle residence time.Document ID19910017901Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsZube, Dieter M.*(Stuttgart Univ. (Germany F.R.)., United States)*Myers, Roger M.*(Sverdrup Technology, Inc., Brook Park OH., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1991Subject CategorySpacecraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberE-6427AIAA PAPER 91-2113NASA-CR-187166NAS 1.26:187166Meeting InformationMeeting: Joint Propulsion ConferenceLocation: Sacramento, CACountry: United StatesStart Date: June 24, 1991End Date: June 27, 1991Sponsors:AIAA,SAE,ASME,ASEEAccession Number91N27215Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-25266PROJECT: RTOP 506-42-31Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910017901.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 633.17 Project management oversight contractor eligibility. ( a ) Any person or entity may provide project management oversight services in connection with a major capital project, with the following exceptions: ( 1 ) An entity may not provide project management oversight services for its own project; and
( 2 ) An entity may not provide project management oversight services for a project if there exists a conflict of interest.
( b ) In choosing private sector persons or entities to provide project management oversight services, the Administrator uses the procurement requirements in the government-wide procurement regulations, found at Chapter 1 of title 48, Code of Federal Regulations.
#### § 80.1 Purpose.

This part implements a Federal credit assistance program for surface transportation projects.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Repro-Med Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew
I. Sealfon, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Andrew I. Sealfon
---------------------
Andrew I. Sealfon, President, Treasurer,
Chairman of the Board, Director, Chief Executive Officer
and Principal Financial Officer

July 21, 2008
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 9/15/15

Received: September 15, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8l58-x2ab

Comments Due: September 24, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule- Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-5291

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Michael Yard

Address: 

8057 Washburn

Goodrich, MI, 48438

Email: golman65@gmail.com

Phone: 8106362743

General Comment

I trade options and futures in my IRA after years of losing in the mutual funds I decided to 

maximize my retirement account, the belief that futures and options is dangerous is absurd the 

only way to trade is the volatility in this market is through options and futures. I can reduce my 

cost basis on all of my trades and protect the direction with futures.

I have traded with the mutual funds for years and seen the market make tremendous gains and 

only capture a small amount of the gains in mutual funds especially in the 90,s.

The education you can learn about options in the recent years is spectacular if a person wants to 

learn, please do not take this away from the investor that wants to grow their account.
Exhibit 32(b)








This Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in such filing.








Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title 18 of the United States Code








In connection with the Annual Report of Columbus Southern Power Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K (the “Report”) for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Brian X. Tierney, the chief financial officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Brian X. Tierney


Brian X. Tierney


Chief Financial Officer








February 24, 2011








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.