alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

(2004/C 88 E/0744)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-1125/04

by Daniela Raschhofer (NI) to the Commission

(6 April 2004)

Subject:   EU programmes with Turkey – potential consequences of full membership

Before the European Council takes a decision in December 2004 on the opening of accession negotiations with Turkey the following questions need to be answered:

Answer given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(29 April 2004)

Until 2002, Turkey had received support under the MEDA programme and through two regulations to support the customs union (1) and economic and social development (2). The Council adopted on 17 December 2001 a regulation concerning pre-accession financial assistance for Turkey. This came into effect in January 2002 and continues to provide the legal base for our financial cooperation with Turkey.

Over the period 2000-2003 annual financial assistance to Turkey averaged EUR 177 million. In April 2003 agreement was reached between the Parliament, Council and Commission to include Turkey in the pre-accession heading of the financial perspectives and to provide substantially increased financial assistance for the period 2004-2006, amounting to EUR 1050 million over the three years (EUR 250 million in 2004, EUR 300 million in 2005 and EUR 500 million in 2006).

It should be recalled that the decision to be taken by the European Council in December 2004 will be based on an assessment of whether Turkey fulfils the Copenhagen political criteria. It is clear that the accession of a country with the size and population of Turkey would have a major impact on the EU, its policies and institutions. The concrete financial consequences and/or obligations for the EU would depend on the outcome of the negotiations.

----

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 764/2000 of 10 April 2000 regarding the implementation of measures to intensify the EC-Turkey customs union, OJ L 94, 14.4.2000.

(2)  Regulation (EC) No 257/2001 of the Parliament and of the Council of 22 January 2001 regarding the implementation of measures to promote economic and social development in Turkey, OJ L 39, 9.2.2001.

----
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

 

I, William W. Krippaehne, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of Fisher Communications, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Fisher Communications, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: September 12, 2003
EXHIBIT 99.1



                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Unitrend, Inc.  (The
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004, as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date
hereof  (the  Report),  I,  Conrad  A.H.  Jelinger, Chief  Executive
Officer  and  Interim  Chief  Financial  Officer  of Unitrend, Inc.,
certify, pursuant  to 18  U.S.C. ss. 1350,  as  adopted  pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained  in  the  Report fairly presents,
in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of Unitrend, Inc.

                                 /s/  Conrad A.H. Jelinger
                                 -----------------------------
                                 Conrad A.H. Jelinger
November 11, 2004
                                 Chief Executive Officer, Interim
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 President
#### Allen Ainsworth, Respondent, *v.*Dutchess Hat Works, Appellant.

*Ainsworth*v. *Dutchess Hat Works,*136 App. Div. 893, affirmed.

(Argued April 5, 1911;

decided April 25, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 15, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant, his employer.

*William L. O’Brian*and *Frank V. Johnson*for appellant.

*Charles Morschauser*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fact Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jacqueline Danforth, President and Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  November 15, 2004

By:  /s/ Jacqueline Danforth

Name:  Jacqueline Danforth

Title:    President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal

Accounting Officer)
----

(2004/C 88 E/0133)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2995/03

by Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(14 October 2003)

Subject:   Damage to valuable relics contained in the temple of St Sophia

Recently the new director of the St Sophia museum, Serazitin Sachin, informed the Turkish Directorate-General for Museums and the Cultural Heritage that 550 invaluable icons and relics (gospels and sacerdotal vestments) had been severely damaged by damp whilst in storage in the temple of St Sophia having been brought in from many orthodox churches in Turkey when they fall into disuse.

Since 1985 St Sophia has been classified as a World Heritage Site and the latest Turkish National Programme for the implementation of the ‘acquis’ indicates that cultural works belonging to the world as a whole are protected under law of 17 June 1987 so as to preserve them in perfect condition for future generations. In view of this, will the Commission adopt a firm position on this matter?

Do the Turkish pre-accession and MEDA programmes include funding earmarked for cultural purposes, in particular the preservation of cultural treasures such as those stored in St Sophia?

Does the Commission not consider that such a serious situation constitutes a backward step regarding compliance with the Community ‘acquis’. What action does it intend to take in response?

Answer given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(12 November 2003)

As already mentioned in the Commission's recent reply to Written Question E-2962/03 by Mr Alavanos (1), the Community's financial assistance programme for Turkey does not allow provision of support for conserving and restoring religious or cultural works, such as those stored in the Hagia Sofia. The programme is designed primarily to support Turkey's alignment with Union standards in the political, economic and legislative areas. Project proposals are prepared by the Turkish Government and are subject to approval by the Commission, which is given only for projects that contribute to meeting the priorities of the Accession Partnership, as adopted by the Council of Ministers on 15 May 2003.

In addition, the Commission monitors very closely the progress achieved by Turkey in adopting the relevant ‘acquis’ in the area of culture.

----

(1)OJ C 78 E, 27.3.2004, p. 771.

----
From: Kevin Murtaugh [mailto:kmmurtaugh@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 4:44 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33- Keep your hands off my 401(K)!

Hello:

I hear there is once again consideration going around to REQUIRE 401(K) participants to

annuitize their holdings???

Are you crazy?

Apparently, you believe so many folks are stupid that such maneuver would actually work?  We

sheep will willingly allow bankrupt insurance companies & banks to charge ridiculous fees to tie

up our money?    

Stop and think for minute about the typical person able to build up a nice 401(K).  Most will not

blindly accept whatever annuity the government sees fit to mandate.  Many will see no choice

but to close 401(K)’s &/or move assets (&/or themselves) out of the country, preferably into

commodities which can be physically held outside the reach of greedy US politicians.  The

government will be stuck subsidizing losers who failed to build up & protect assets while the rest

of sit in assets you cannot print to make up the difference.

Keep your hands off my 401(K)!

Regards, 

Kevin Murtaugh 

(408)893-5327 

kmmurtaugh@gmail.com
----

(2004/C 84 E/0623)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0198/04

by Sebastiano Musumeci (UEN) to the Commission

(22 January 2004)

Subject:   Creation of a Community body for the study of unexplained atmospheric phenomena

For a long time now, sightings of unexplained atmospheric phenomena have been reported in all corners of the globe.

Some of these phenomena have been classified as ‘unidentified flying objects’ (UFOs), sightings of which not only cause considerable perplexity but also fuel theories — so far lacking any foundation — on the probable existence of aliens.

The serious study of the phenomena in question by various European space centres and research establishments warrants special attention from the European Commission, since these phenomena do not fall within the scope of individual Member State competence.

In the light of the above, would the Commission not consider it appropriate to promote and coordinate research and information on unexplained atmospheric phenomena at a Europe-wide level, possibly assigning this responsibility to a specialised and experienced body such as SEPRA (Service d'Expertise des Phénomènes Rares Aérospatiaux) in Toulouse or the European Space Agency?

Answer given by Mr Busquin on behalf of the Commission

(1 March 2004)

Following an extensive consultation for the development of the European Space Policy (‘Green Paper’) (1) the Commission adopted in December 2003 a White Paper entitled ‘Space: a new European frontier for an expanding Union’ (2).

The White Paper, which has been prepared in close collaboration with the scientific community and the European Space Agency, sets an action plan for implementing the future European Space policy. The actions recommended by the Commission to strengthen European excellence in space science are presented in Section 4.2.

On 28 January 2004, the Commission had the opportunity to address some of these issues in its oral reply to the oral question O-84/03 during Parliament's January 2004 session (3) on the content of the White Paper.

One specific activity which may be of particular interest to the Honourable Member concerns an action recently launched in the context of the 6th Framework Programme for Research (4). This action aims at promoting cooperation between Europe's national research funding agencies and national research organisations. It includes a task specifically addressing European solar terrestrial and atmospheric research. This endeavour should help to improve the level of understanding of atmospheric phenomena and to provide space weather services.

----

(1)  COM(2003) 17 final.

(2)  COM(2003) 673 final.

(3)  Oral reply, 28.1.2004.

(4)  Specific Support Action: European Science Foundation Collaborative Research Programmes Scheme (Eurocores).

----
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

EILEEN MARIE GELLER,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-50210

D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00358-GHK

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

George H. King, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2012** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Eileen Marie Geller appeals from the 36-month sentence imposed following

her guilty-plea conviction for five counts of health care fraud, in violation of 18

U.S.C. § 1347. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

FEB 23 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-50210

Geller contends that the district court procedurally erred when it failed to

consider or explain adequately why it rejected Geller’s arguments for a lenient

sentence and the probation officer’s recommendation. The record belies her

contention. The district court considered Geller’s mitigating arguments and

adequately explained that in light of the severity of the offense and the need to

promote respect for the law, a sentence one month below the advisory Guidelines

range was warranted. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992-93 (9th Cir.

2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.
# Iraqi Army Day

/ Published Jan. 8, 2018

Jan. 6, 2018

Release # 20180106-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**SOUTHWEST ASIA -** Combined Joint Forces Land Component Command - Operation Inherent Resolve joins Iraqi leaders and citizens in recognizing their 97th Iraqi Armed Forces Day.

This day of celebration commemorates the activation of the Iraqi Army on Jan. 6, 1921.

“Our Iraqi brothers in arms have relentlessly fought for and achieved liberation of their country from the evil known as Daesh,” said Maj. Gen. Pat White, Commander, Combined Joint Forces Land Component Command - Operation Inherent Resolve and 1st Armored Division. “We are proud of everything they have accomplished, particularly in the past year, and we applaud the military force they have become in order to protect their homeland. It is our honor to stand by the Iraqi Army today.”

NOTE: A video message from Lt. Gen Paul E. Funk II, Commanding General of CJTF-OIR, along with other images of the event, will be found at:

https://www.dvidshub.net/unit/CJTF-OIR
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MAREX.COM,
INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      35,700,759
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,577,532
<PP&E>                                       1,832,925
<DEPRECIATION>                                 254,327
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,859,852
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,207,121
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 37,614,021
<COMMON>                                        67,612
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,082,852)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                40,859,852
<SALES>                                          4,612
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,612
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            30,943,327
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,827
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (30,409,375)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (30,409,375)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (30,409,375)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (4.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (4.72)


</TABLE>
#### § 655.62 Referral, evaluation, and treatment.

If a covered employee has a verified positive drug test result, or has a confirmed alcohol test of 0.04 or greater, or refuses to submit to a drug or alcohol test required by this part, the employer shall advise the employee of the resources available for evaluating and resolving problems associated with prohibited drug use and alcohol misuse, including the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of substance abuse professionals (SAPs) and counseling and treatment programs.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 189 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 52
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 189

                          [Report No. 107-136]

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 36) 
    proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 authorizing the Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the 
                       flag of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                July 12 (legislative day, July 11), 2001

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 36) 
    proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 authorizing the Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the 
                       flag of the United States.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 36) 
proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
authorizing the Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the 
flag of the United States. The joint resolution shall be considered as 
read for amendment. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the joint resolution and any amendment thereto to final 
passage without intervening motion except: (1) two hours of debate 
equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on the Judiciary; (2) an amendment in the 
nature of a substitute, if offered by Representative Conyers of 
Michigan or his designee, which shall be considered as read and shall 
be separately debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by 
the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.

                                                  House Calendar No. 52

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 189

                          [Report No. 107-136]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 36) 
    proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 authorizing the Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the 
                       flag of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                July 12 (legislative day, July 11), 2001

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
# Feb. 27 Red Sea Update 

/ Published Feb. 27, 2024

Feb. 27, 2024Release Number 20240227 - 01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

On Feb. 27, between the hours of 9:50p.m. and 10:55 p.m. (Sanaa time), U.S. aircraft and a coalition warship shot down five Iranian-backed Houthi one-way attack (OWA) unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) in the Red Sea. 

CENTCOM forces identified these UAVs originating from Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen and determined they presented an imminent threat to merchant vessels and to the U.S. Navy and coalition ships in the region. These actions will protect freedom of navigation and make international waters safer and more secure for U.S. Navy and merchant vessels.
Carroll,

June, 1900.

#### McGill, *Adm’x, v.*Maine and New Hampshire Granite Co.

Petition, for a new trial on the ground of accident, mistake, or misfortune. Subject to exception, the petition was dismissed because its allegations were not sustained.

*Exception overruled.*

*627
      *Josiah S. Soils*and *Bred B.*Osgood, for the plaintiff.

*John B. Nash*and *Walter B. S. Sill,*for the defendants.

Pabsons, J., did not sit: the others concurred.