alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 572
Editorial Notes: 1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 572.102 Drop test. ( a ) When the headform is dropped from a height of 14.8 inches in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section, the peak resultant accelerations at the location of the accelerometers mounted in the headform as shown in drawing 92041-001 (incorporated by reference; see § 572.100) shall not be less than 225g, and not more than 275g. The acceleration/time curve for the test shall be unimodal to the extent that oscillations occurring after the main acceleration pulse are less than ten percent (zero to peak) of the main pulse. The lateral acceleration vector shall not exceed 15g (zero to peak).
( b ) *Test procedure.* ( 1 ) Soak the headform in a test environment at any temperature between 19 degrees C. to 26 degrees C. and at a relative humidity from 10 percent to 70 percent for a period of at least four hours prior to its use in a test.
( 2 ) Clean the headform's skin surface and the surface of the impact plate with 1,1,1 Trichloroethane or equivalent.
( 3 ) Suspend the headform, as shown in Figure 50. Position the forehead below the chin such that the skull cap plate is at an angle of 28.5 ±0.5 degrees with the impact surface when the midsagittal plane is vertical.
( 4 ) Drop the headform from the specified height by means that ensure instant release onto a rigidly supported flat horizontal steel plate, which is 2 inches thick and 2 feet square. The plate shall have a clean, dry surface and any microfinish of not less than 8 microinches 203.2 × 10−6 mm (rms) and not more than 80 microinches 2032 × 10−6 mm (rms).
( 5 ) Allow at least 3 hours between successive tests on the same headform.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. EI LEEN M A RI E G ELLER, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 10- 50210 D. C . No . 2 : 0 8 - c r - 0 0 3 5 8 - GH K ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia G e or ge H . K i ng, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry21, 2012 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , M cK E O W N , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. E i l e e n M ar i e G e l l e rappe a l s f r om the 36- m onth s e nt e nc e i m pos e d f ol l ow i ng he rgui l ty - pl e ac onvi c t i on f orf i ve c ount s of

he a l th c a r e f

r aud, i n vi ol a t i on of

18 U . S. C. § 1 3 4 7 . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED FEB 23 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 50210 2 G e lle rc o n te n d s th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o c e du r a llye rr e dw h e n it f a ile dto c ons i de rore xpl a i n a de qua t e l yw hyi tr e j e c t e d G e l l e r ’ s a r gum e nt s f oral e ni e nt se nt ence and the prob at i on offi ce r’ s r ec om m endat i on . T he re cord bel i es her c ont e nt i on. T he di s tr i c tc ourtc ons i de r e d G e l l e r ’ s m i t i ga t i ng a r gum e nt s a nd a d e q u a te lye x p la in e dth a t in lig h t o f th e s e v e r ityo f

th e o f f e n s e a n dth e n e e dto prom ot e r es pectfor the l aw , a s ent ence on e m on th b el ow the advi soryG ui del i nes r a n g e w a s w a rr a n te d . Se e U n ite d S ta tes v . Ca r ty , 52 0 F . 3d 98 4, 99 2-93 (9th C i r. 20 08 ) ( en banc). AF F I RME D.
#### § 29.415 Does the Prompt Payment Act apply to funds included in a funding agreement?

The Prompt Payment Act, 31 U.S.C. 3901 *et seq.,* applies to the transfer of funds under the Program.
U.S. and Jordan Complete Bilateral Maritime Exercise
 
  By U.S. Naval Forces Central Command Public Affairs
  U.S. 5th Fleet and the Jordanian Armed Forces (JAF) completed a two-week bilateral maritime exercise, Infinite Defender 2023, off the coast of Aqaba, Jordan, Aug. 23. More than 300 Jordanian and U.S. Sailors, Marines, Coast Guardsmen, Soldiers and Airmen participated. Task Force 56 led the exercise working alongside Task Force 52, Task Force 59, U.S. Patrol Forces Southwest Asia and Fleet Anti-Terrorism Security Team Central Command. “It’s inspiring to see all the joint forces working together in this vital region,” said Capt. Oliver Herion, commander of Task Force 56. “Together, we continue to grow and build on our tactics, readiness and commitment to regional maritime security and stability.” During the exercise, U.S. and Jordanian forces practiced a variety of skills including humanitarian assistance and disaster response, small boat maintenance, maritime interdiction, maritime security, explosive ordnance disposal, live fire exercises and maritime clearing mines. Infinite Defender is an annual bilateral exercise between the JAF and U.S. Navy, Marine Corps and Coast Guard forces from NAVCENT focused on maritime infrastructure protection, explosive ordnance disposal, and anti-terrorism force protection. The U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations encompasses nearly 2.5 million square miles of water area and includes the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, Red Sea, parts of the Indian Ocean and three critical choke points at the Strait of Hormuz, Suez Canal and Bab al-Mandeb.
# Strike conducted in Syria

/ Published June 27, 2022

Jun. 27, 2022Release Number 20220627-01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CENTCOM Forces conducted a kinetic strike in Idlib province, Syria, June 27, targeting Abu Hamzah al Yemeni, a senior leader of Hurras al-Din, an Al Qaeda-aligned terrorist organization. Abu Hamzah al Yemeni was traveling alone on a motorcycle at the time of the strike. Initial review indicates no civilian casualties.Violent extremist organizations, including Al Qaeda-aligned organizations such as Hurras al-Din, continue to present a threat to America and our allies. Al Qaeda-aligned militants use Syria as a safe haven to coordinate with their external affiliates and plan operations outside of Syria. The removal of this senior leader will disrupt Al Qaeda's ability to carry out attacks against U.S. citizens, our partners, and innocent civilians around the world.-30-
2/05/2004 REVISED EXPOSURE REPORT Revision is based on accepted by Bob Boethling in 1/14/04 Admin LAN e-mail message to Edna Pleasants Case Number: P030633 Assessor: Flessner ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES Scenario#: 1 Number of Release Sites: Release Activity: Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE Total Releases: (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) Release Days/yr: Per Site Release: (kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) Remarks:INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT --- CASE NUMBER: P030633INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Case Number: P030633 Assessor: ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES Scenario#: 2 Number of Release Sites: Release Activity: Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE Total Releases: (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) Release Days/yr: Per Site Release: (kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) Remarks:INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER:P030633
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Computer HorizonsCorp. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “AnnualReport”), I, Michael J. Shea, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:

1.     the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78mor 78o(d)); and

2.     the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

| Date:   March 16, 2006 | /s/  MICHAEL  J. SHEA |
|---------------------------------------|----------------------------|
|                                  | MICHAEL J. SHEA            |
|                                  | *Chief Financial Officer*  |

 

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Kpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended(the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporatedby reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, orthe Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specificallyincorporates it by reference.

----
#### § 525.2 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to provide content and format requirements for low volume manufacturers of passenger automobiles which desire to petition the Administrator for exemption from applicable average fuel economy standards and for establishment of appropriate alternative average fuel economy standards and to give interested persons an opportunity to present data, views and arguments on those petitions.
----

(2004/C 84 E/0546)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1571/03

by Erik Meijer (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(8 May 2003)

Subject:   Solutions for environmental problems in Flanders without increasing dependence on private firms

Sources: De Standard, 9 April and 10 April 2003, De Morgen, 10 April 2003, De Financiëel Economische Tijd, 10 April 2003.

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(25 June 2003)

----

(1)  See page 471.

----
#### § 511.52 Adoption of initial decision.

The Initial Decision and Order shall become the Final Decision and Order of the Administrator forty (40) days after issuance unless an appeal is noted and perfected or unless review is ordered by the Administrator. Upon the expiration of the fortieth day, the Executive Secretary shall prepare, sign and enter an order adopting the Initial Decision and Order.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Joseph Nacco, Appellant.

(Argued March 28, 1911;

decided April 25, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, rendered June 24, 1909, at a Trial Term for the county of Niagara, upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of murder in the first degree.

*T. F. C. Clary*for appellant.

*Fred M. Ackerson, District Attorney,*for respondent.

Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Cray, Haight, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: Vann and Collin, JJ.
**Exhibit32**

** **

CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF PALMETTOBANCSHARES, INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 

 

Theundersigned, as the chief executive officer and principal financial officer ofPalmetto Bancshares, Inc., certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe period ended March 31, 2008, which accompanies this certification, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in theperiodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc. at the datesand for the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and no purchaser orseller of securities or any other person shall be entitled to rely upon theforegoing certification for any purpose.  The undersigned expressly disclaimsany obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.

 

 

 

/s/      L. Leon Patterson                           

L. Leon Patterson

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Palmetto Bancshares, Inc.

 

 

 

/s/      Paul W. Stringer                                              

Paul W. Stringer

President and Chief Operating Officer,

Chief Accounting Officer 

Palmetto Bancshares, Inc.

 

 

Dated:May 12, 2008
Presidential Documents

51351 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 172 

Thursday, September 6, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Presidential Determination No. 2007–29 of August 27, 2007 

Assignment of Function Concerning Assistance to Afghanistan 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State[,] Director of National Drug Control Policy[, and the] Director of National Intelligence 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and laws 

of the United States, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, 

the function of the President under the heading ‘‘Economic Support Fund’’ 

in the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 109–102)(the ‘‘Act’’), as carried forward 

by the Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (Public Law 

110–5), that relates to waiver of a provision is assigned to the Secretary 

of State. The Director of National Drug Control Policy and the Director 

of National Intelligence shall, consistent with applicable law, provide the 

Secretary of State with such information as may be necessary to assist 

the Secretary in the performance of such function. 

Reference in this memorandum to the provision in the Act shall be deemed 

to include references to any provision of law that is the same or substantially 

the same as such provision. 

The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, August 27, 2007. 

[FR Doc. 07–4374 

Filed 9–5–07; 8:47 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PRESDOCGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
From: David Anderson [mailto:davidanderson352@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 8:00 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 Department of Labor

Don't you dare convert my 401(k) into an Annuity. 

That is completely unacceptable. 

I am saving that money for me and my heirs. 

It's my responsibility to make sure it covers my expenses and 

lasts my entire lifetime. 

Don't do it. Don't you grab my money and sell me a promise. 

David 

-- 

David Anderson
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSpace-based Doppler lidar sampling strategies: Algorithm development and simulated observation experimentsLidar Atmospheric Wind Sounder (LAWS) Simulation Models (LSM) were developed to evaluate the potential impact of global wind observations on the basic understanding of the Earth's atmosphere and on the predictive skills of current forecast models (GCM and regional scale). Fully integrated top to bottom LAWS Simulation Models for global and regional scale simulations were developed. The algorithm development incorporated the effects of aerosols, water vapor, clouds, terrain, and atmospheric turbulence into the models. Other additions include a new satellite orbiter, signal processor, line of sight uncertainty model, new Multi-Paired Algorithm and wind error analysis code. An atmospheric wind field library containing control fields, meteorological fields, phenomena fields, and new European Center for Medium Range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF) data was also added. The LSM was used to address some key LAWS issues and trades such as accuracy and interpretation of LAWS information, data density, signal strength, cloud obscuration, and temporal data resolution.Document ID19910020240Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsEmmitt, G. D.*(Simpson Weather Associates, Inc. Charlottesville, VA, United States)*Wood, S. A.*(Simpson Weather Associates, Inc. Charlottesville, VA, United States)*Morris, M.*(Simpson Weather Associates, Inc. Charlottesville, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 15, 1990Subject CategoryLasers And MasersReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-184172NAS 1.26:184172Accession Number91N29554Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-37779Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910020240.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Hilbert *v.*New Castle Township, Appellant.

May 14, 1915:

Argued December 7, 1914.

Appeals, Nos. 43 and 44, Oct. T., 1914, by defendant, from judgments of C. P. Schuylkill Co., Nov. T., 1911, No. 126, on verdict for plaintiffs in case of James Hilbert and Mary Hilbert, his wife, v. Township of New Castle.

Before Rice, P. J., Orlady, Head, Kephart and Trexler, JJ.

Reversed.

Opinion by

Orlady, J.,

The decision of these two appeals is controlled by Tobin and wife v. the same defendant, which was decided by the Supreme Court, March 29, 1915, the facts being the same in each case as they grew out of the same accident. Following the conclusion reached in that case, the judgments in these appeals are reversed and is now entered for the defendant.
#### § 604.17 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to set out the requirements for requesting an advisory opinion from the Chief Counsel's Office. An advisory opinion may also request that the Chief Counsel issue a cease and desist order, which would be an order to refrain from doing an act which, if done, would be a violation of this part.
# July 30: Military airstrikes continue against ISIS terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published July 30, 2017
July 30, 2017Release # 20170730-01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**SOUTHWEST ASIA -** On July 29, Coalition military forces conducted 18 strikes consisting of 28 engagements against ISIS terrorists in Syria and Iraq.In Syria, Coalition military forces conducted 12 strikes consisting of 17 engagements against ISIS targets.* Near Abu Kamal, one strike destroyed an ISIS headquarters.* Near Al Shadaddi, one strike engaged an ISIS tactical unit and destroyed a staging area.* Near Dayr Az Zawr, two strikes destroyed five ISIS oil stills and four oil tanks.* Near Raqqah, eight strikes engaged eight ISIS tactical units and destroyed seven fighting positions and three vehicles.In Iraq, Coalition military forces conducted six strikes consisting of 11 engagements against ISIS targets.* Near Al Huwayjah, one strike engaged an ISIS tactical unit and destroyed an ISIS-held building.* Near Al Qaim, two strikes engaged an ISIS tactical unit and destroyed a staging area.* Near Kisik, two strikes destroyed three ISIS-held buildings and a supply cache.* Near Rawah, one strike destroyed an ISIS fighting position, a VBIED and a VBIED facility.Additionally, 19 strikes were conducted in Syria and Iraq on July 28 that closed within the last 24 hours.* On July 28, near Dayr Az Zawr, Syria, one strike destroyed four ISIS oil stills.* On July 28, near Raqqah, Syria, 16 strikes engaged 12 ISIS tactical units, destroyed an anti-air artillery system, and damaged seven fighting positions.* On July 28, near Sultan Abdullah, Iraq, one strike engaged an ISIS tactical unit and destroyed a tunnel system.* On July 28, near Tal Afar, Iraq, one strike engaged an ISIS tactical unit and destroyed a vehicle.These strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to destroy ISIS in Iraq and Syria.  The destruction of ISIS targets in Iraq and Syria also further limits the group's ability to project terror and conduct external operations throughout the region and the rest of the world.This Coalition strike release contains all strikes conducted by fighter, attack, bomber, rotary-wing, or remotely piloted aircraft, rocket propelled artillery and ground-based tactical artillery.A strike, as defined in the Coalition release, refers to one or more kinetic engagements that occur in roughly the same geographic location to produce a single, sometimes cumulative effect in that location.  For example, a single aircraft delivering a single weapon against a lone ISIS vehicle is one strike, but so is multiple aircraft delivering dozens of weapons against a group of ISIS-held buildings and weapon systems in a compound, having the cumulative effect of making that facility harder or impossible to use. Strike assessments are based on initial reports and may be refined.CJTF-OIR does not report the number or type of aircraft employed in a strike, the number of munitions dropped in each strike, or the number of individual munition impact points against a target. The information used to compile the daily strike releases is based on 'Z' or Greenwich Mean Time.
-----Original Message----- 

From: Trevor Conn [mailto:yuggoth23@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 9:30 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 

To Whom It May Concern: 

In response to the question of support for the government takeover of 

401(k)s or other retirement accounts, my response is an emphatic 

"NO!!!" My money is mine to do with it what I will. You already get 

enough from me every year to spend on things I don't agree with. 

Perhaps this is someone's idea of a back-door way to pay for Obamacare. 

I can manage my own money thank you very much. Having the government 

molly-coddle the populace is no way to engender personal fiscal 

responsibility. But then I'd expect nothing less from a government that 

seems to have no grasp of basic economics anyway. 

Respect property rights: hands off our retirement savings! 

Trevor Conn 

Boulder, CO
----

(2004/C 84 E/0814)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1500/03

by Florence Kuntz (EDD) to the Commission

(5 May 2003)

Subject:   Safeguarding the Iraqi archaeological heritage

The bombs that have been raining down on Mesopotamia since 20 March and the destruction and looting of the Baghdad Archaeological Museum remind us that Iraq's archaeological heritage has since 1991 been in peril.

Apart from the destruction of archaeological sites during the Gulf War there has been the looting, the departure of foreign archaeological missions, the abandonment of digs and trafficking with the West in stolen property.

The American military campaign of the past three weeks has brought about the collapse of the Iraqi regime. In the absence of a government, one can only wonder who is now protecting the seven national museums and some 10 000 archaeological sites throughout the country.

How does the European Union wish to show its support for the Iraqi people and help them protect their exceptional heritage?

How does the European Union intend to mobilise the Member States against the illegal trade in stolen property?

----