alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   February 27, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Charles N. Eldred                          |
|------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                     |   | Charles N. Eldred                                                                                                                                                           |
|                                     |   | Executive Vice President and                                                                                                                                                |
|                                     |   | Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                     |
|                                     |   | PNM Resources, Inc.                                                                                                                                                         |

----
# CENTCOM Commander calls UAE Leadership on Anniversary of Attack by Iran-Aligned Group

/ Published Jan. 17, 2023

Jan. 17, 2023

Release Number 20230117-02

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla. –** On the one-year anniversary of the Jan. 17, 2022 drone and missile attack on Abu Dhabi by Iran-aligned forces, Gen. Michael “Erik” Kurilla, commander of U.S. Central Command, called the Chief of Staff of the United Arab Emirates Armed Forces, Staff Lt. Gen. Engineer Issa Saif Mohammed Al Mazrouei, today, to reinforce the importance of the strategic partnership between CENTCOM and UAE.

“Last year’s attack by Houthi forces on private citizens, civilians, and public facilities on Emirati soil is a stark reminder of the risk to the region posed by Iranian-backed groups,” said Kurilla.

Kurilla also said, “UAE has always been a strong and reliable partner. I recognize the sacrifice that UAE has made over the past twenty years in multiple operations and campaigns alongside CENTCOM forces. CENTCOM is committed to the security and stability of the region.”

-30-
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


SECTION 302





I, W. Page Ogden, hereby certify that:








1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Britton & Koontz Capital Corporation;




2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.











Date:
November 12, 2010
/s/ W. Page OgdenW. Page OgdenChief Executive Officer
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Business and Economy    >Retail - Monthly    >FAQs    >Quarterly E-Commerce FAQs    >Sample Revision FAQs
 Skip to looking for section Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  Quarterly E-Commerce Report - Sample Revision FAQs


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 29, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 136133 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 136133 COA: 282335 Oakland CC: 2002-183506-FC VANG TER LOR, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 19, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

d0721 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 29, 2008

Clerk
# U.S. air strikes kill senior AQAP militants

/ Published Jan. 10, 2018

Release Number 20180109-01                                                                                           

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

****

**TAMPA, Fla. –** U.S. air strikes in Yemen recently resulted in the death of key Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula leaders.

U.S. forces continue sustained counterterrorism operations in Yemen against AQAP and ISIS, in coordination with the Government of Yemen, to degrade these groups’ ability to hold territory and coordinate external attacks.

External operations facilitator Miqdad al Sana’ani was killed in an air strike Dec. 15 in al-Bayda governorate.

Habib al-Sana’ani, AQAP deputy arms facilitator, who was an intermediary with ties to senior AQAP leadership and was responsible for facilitating the movement of weapons, explosives and finances into northern Marib and al-Bayda governorates, was killed in an airstrike Dec. 19 in Marib governorate.

Abu Umar al-Sana’ani, an AQAP Dawah committee member, was killed in an air strike Nov. 20 in al-Bayda governorate.

                                                                                                -30-
#### Julia Nugent, Respondent, v. Lucy Vandeveer, Appellant.

Judgment reversed, new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by raay, J.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 183 (Friday, September 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 54050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4672]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the 
Integrative Nutrition and Metabolic Processes Study Section, October 4, 
2007, 8:30 a.m. to October 5, 2007, 2 p.m., Oakland Marriott City 
Center, 1001 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94607 which was published in the 
Federal Register on September 10, 2007, 72 FR 51649-51652.
    The meeting will be held October 4, 2007, 7:30 a.m. to October 5, 
2007, 12 p.m. The meeting location remains the same. The meeting is 
closed to the public.

    Dated: September 13, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-4672 Filed 9-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
H. Res. 406

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 11, 2002.

Whereas the well-being of all people of the United States is

preserved and enhanced as a direct result of the vigilance

and dedication of law enforcement personnel;

Whereas more than 700,000 law enforcement personnel, at

great risk to their personal safety, serve their fellow citizens as guardians of peace;

Whereas peace officers are on the front line in preserving the

right of the children of the United States to receive an

education in a crime-free environment, a right that is all

too often threatened by the insidious fear caused by violence in schools;

Whereas 70 peace officers died at the World Trade Center in

New York City on September 11, 2001, the most peace

officers ever killed in a single incident in the history of

the Nation;

Whereas more than 220 peace officers across the Nation were

killed in the line of duty during 2001, which represents

57 percent more police fatalities than the previous year

and makes 2001 the deadliest year for the law enforcement community since 1974;

Whereas every year, 1 out of every 9 peace officers is assaulted, 1 out of every 25 peace officers is injured, and
2

•HRES 406 EH

1 out of every 4,400 peace officers is killed in the line

of duty;

Whereas section 136 of title 36, United States Code, requests

that the President issue each year a proclamation designating May 15 as Peace Officers Memorial Day in honor

of Federal, State, and local officers killed or disabled in

the line of duty; and

Whereas on May 15, 2002, more than 15,000 peace officers

are expected to gather in Washington, D.C. to join with

the families of their recently fallen comrades to honor

those comrades and all others who went before them:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House—

2 (1) honors Federal, State, and local peace offi3 cers killed or disabled in the line of duty;

4 (2) supports the goals and ideals of Peace Offi5 cers Memorial Day; and

6 (3) calls upon the people of the United States

7 to observe such a day with appropriate ceremonies

8 and respect.

Attest:

Clerk.
1210-AB32-2-1047.html[7/23/2015 3:20:33 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-o10x

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1539

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: anoymous anoymous

General Comment

I can plan my own retirement without government meddling, thank you very much. Please respect my god given

 right to do so. Let's all do our part keep this country the greatest on gods green earth. Please stick to your oath.
-----Original Message-----

From: mailagent@thesoftedge.com [mailto:mailagent@thesoftedge.com] 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Dear Secretary Perez:

As someone saving for my future, I appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Department of 

Labor's proposed retirement rule. I agree that more needs to be done to ensure savers are prepared for 

retirement, and I fully support financial advisors operating in the best interest of their clients. However, 

the proposed retirement regulation is unworkable and will negatively impact my advisors' ability to help 

me save for the future. 

Right now, my advisor is able to provide guidance that balances the price and level of education savers 

need to meet my retirement goals. However, the proposal's new "Best Interest Contract" exemption will 

create a new, complicated regulatory structure that will unnecessarily limit savers' choice and raise 

costs. In my view, the DOL's long list of requirements and exemptions are currently unworkable for 

investors who choose commission-based relationships, which will result in small and middle income 

savers being forced into fee-based advisory accounts and cause others to go it alone without the 

assistance of an investment professional. This is problematic because data show that when comparing 

identical savers (e.g., income and age), those working with an advisor have 58% more in assets in four to 

six years; 99% more in assets in seven to 14 years; and 173% more in assets in 15 years and beyond than 

those who don't work with a financial professional.

Without these services, savers will be forced into either discount brokerage accounts, or into more 

expensive fee-based retirement accounts. I have no doubt that some savers will end up worse off. In 

fact, many small savers were shut out of the system when a comparable investment information rule 

was implemented in 2013 in the U.K. In the months following the implementation, customers with less 

than $80,000 in total assets saw a reduction in access to investment guidance and 60,000 total investors 

were unable to access financial guidance because their balances were too small. The new rule also 

creates a fragmented advice model, where different standards and rules will apply to conversations with 

clients based on which type of account is discussed. This will only lead to more investor confusion.

The Department appears to believe that financial professionals steer clients toward particular products 

in their personal financial interest. Based on my experience that's not only incorrect, it's not at all 

reflective of the relationship I have with my financial advisor.

I must urge the DOL to reconsider the viability of its proposed rule and the effect it will have on 

retirement outcomes. The best way to serve the retirement industry would be to work with the 

Securities and Exchange Commission and FINRA to develop a uniform standard across all retail accounts.

Thank you for considering my comments.

Sincerely,
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 40938 Summary Calendar

COURTLAND LINDSAY , Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.
SMITH COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE , Defendant

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:14

- CV

- 641

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges: PER CURIAM: * The district court dismissed Courtland Dewayne Lindsay’s amended complaint for failure to provide a short and plain statement either of the grounds for federal jurisdiction or of his claims for relief. See F ED

. R. C IV

. P. 8(a). Lindsay’s largely unintell igible brief on appeal fails to cure these deficiencies. Accordingly, his outstanding motions are DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous pursuant to Fifth Circuit Rule 42.2. See

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 9, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-40938 Document: 00513110792 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/09/2015No. 14

- 40938

2 Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 19 7, 202 n.24 (5th Cir. 1997). Lindsay is CAUTIONED that future frivolous or repetitive filings will result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal, monetary sanctions, and restrictions on his ability to file pleadings in this court or any court subject to this court’s jurisdiction. He is further CAUTIONED to review all pending matters in this court and move to dismiss any that are frivolous or repetitive. Case: 14-40938 Document: 00513110792 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/09/2015
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 359 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 359

    Providing amounts for further expenses of the Permanent Select 
  Committee on Intelligence in the second session of the One Hundred 
                           Seventh Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2002

Mr. Ney (for himself and Mr. Hoyer) submitted the following resolution; 
      which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Providing amounts for further expenses of the Permanent Select 
  Committee on Intelligence in the second session of the One Hundred 
                           Seventh Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. FURTHER EXPENSES OF THE PERMANENT SELECT COMMITTEE ON 
              INTELLIGENCE.

    For further expenses of the Permanent Select Committee on 
Intelligence, there shall be paid out of the applicable accounts of the 
House of Representatives not more than $1,600,000.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION.

    Amounts shall be available under this resolution for expenses 
incurred during the period beginning at noon on January 3, 2002, and 
ending immediately before noon on January 3, 2003.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, signed by the 
chairman of such committee, and approved in the manner directed by the 
Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.

SEC. 5. ADJUSTMENT AUTHORITY.

    The Committee on House Administration shall have authority to make 
adjustments in amounts under section 1, if necessary to comply with an 
order of the President issued under section 254 of the Balanced Budget 
and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 or to conform to any 
reduction in appropriations for the purposes of such section 1.
                                 <all>
```
# GENERAL JOHN NICHOLSON CONDEMNS SUICIDE ATTACK ON PAKISTAN POLICE OFFICERS

/ Published July 25, 2017
**KABUL, Afghanistan, July 25, 2017 –**
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 14

- 00057

- CR

LARRY JERMAINE WIGENTON, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court 3 of Dallas County Dallas County, Texas Trial Court No. F

- 1371124

- J

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.2 O R D E R Larry Jermaine Wigenton has filed a motion complaining that he has no counsel in his pending appeal. The appeal was transferred to this Court from the Fifth Court of Appeals. Wigenton asks this Court to appoint counsel to represent him. He is before this Court in an appeal fr om the revocation of his community supervision and the final adjudication of guilt. Wigenton had appointed counsel both at the original hearing and at his adjudication hearing. The record sheds no light on the nature of the previous counsel’s appointme nt or possible release from her duty to represent the defendant. See T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN
. art

. 1.051 (West Supp. 2013) . This Court has contacted Wigenton’s last appointed counsel, Pamela Segura

- Muhammad of the Dallas County Public Defender’s Office, and s he has informed this Court that her understanding is that she is no longer representing Wigenton. Under these circumstances, pursuant to Article 1.051(d) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure , we find it appropriate to grant Wigenton’s motion for the appointment of counsel, and abate this appeal to the trial court for the purpose of appointing counsel to represent Wigenton on appeal. The appointment s hall be made within fifteen days of the date of this order. A supplemental clerk’s record containing the appointment shall be filed with this Court no later than ten days after the appointment is made. All appellate timetables are stayed and will resume on the filing of the supplemental clerk’s record containing the order of appointment

.3 IT IS SO ORDERED

. BY THE COURT
Date: June 5, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 390 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 18, 2002.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to take 
from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 586) to amend the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 to provide that the exclusion from gross income for foster care payments 
shall also apply to payments by qualified placement agencies, and for other 
purposes, with the Senate amendment thereto, and to consider in the House 
without intervention of any point of order a motion offered by the chairman of 
the Committee on Ways and Means or his designee that the House concur in the 
Senate amendment with the amendment printed in the report of the Committee on 
Rules accompanying this resolution. The Senate amendment and the motion shall be 
considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided 
and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Ways and Means. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
motion to final adoption without intervening motion or demand for division of 
the question.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```