alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Save withsolar and wind [electronic resource].**** 
SuDocNumber:E1.2:SO 4/23/
ItemNumber:0429-A(online)
CGPsystem Number:000584972
 
Summer2002
Winter 2001/2002
Vol. 3, No. 2
Vol. 3, No. 1
Vol. 2, No. 2
Vol. 2, No. 1
Vol. 1, No. 3
Vol. 1, No. 2
Vol. 1, No. 1
 **
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Business and Economy    >Retail - Monthly    >State Retail Sales
 Skip to looking for section Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  Monthly State Retail Sales
 Experimental Tables Logo The Monthly State Retail Sales (MSRS) is the Census Bureau's new experimental data product featuring modeled state-level retail sales. This is a blended data product using Monthly Retail Trade Survey data, administrative data, and third-party data. Year-over-year percentage changes are available for Total Retail Sales excluding Nonstore Retailers as well as 11 retail North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) retail subsectors. These data are provided by state and NAICS codes beginning with January 2019. The Census Bureau plans to continue to improve the methodology to be able to publish more data in the future.
Please email us with any questions or feedback at EID.Monthly.State.Retail@census.gov Data March 2024 Monthly State Retail Sales were released on June 27, 2024 and are available in the csv files and data visualization below. For explanatory materials for these experimental statistics, please visit the Monthly State Retail Sales Overview and the technical documentation. For more information on the content of the data files, please reference the Monthly State Retail Sales Data Dictionary March 2024 Monthly State Retail Sales Report: PDF
	Not Adjusted State Retail Sales Year-over-Year Percentage Changes: CSV
	Standard Errors: CSV
	Coverage Measures: CSV
	The Census Bureau has reviewed this data product to ensure appropriate access, use, and disclosure avoidance protection of the confidential source data (Project No. P-7506880, Disclosure Review Board (DRB) approval number: CBDRB-FY24-0004).
 Interactive Visualization
 Other Information April 2024 Monthly State Retail Sales data will be released at 12:00 p.m. on Wednesday, July 31, 2024. The MSRS release date schedule is available here. For questions or feedback, please email EID.Monthly.State.Retail@census.gov.


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
§ 604.36 Powers of a PO. A PO may: ( a ) Give notice of, and hold, pre-hearing conferences and hearings;
( b ) Administer oaths and affirmations;
( c ) Issue notices of deposition requested by the parties;
( d ) Limit the frequency and extent of discovery;
( e ) Rule on offers of proof;
( f ) Receive relevant and material evidence;
( g ) Regulate the course of the hearing in accordance with the rules of this part to avoid unnecessary and duplicative proceedings in the interest of prompt and fair resolution of the matters at issue;
( h ) Hold conferences to settle or to simplify the issues by consent of the parties;
( i ) Dispose of procedural motions and requests;
( j ) Examine witnesses; and
( k ) Make findings of fact and conclusions of law and issue a recommended decision.
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*James Masterson *v.*The Board of Fire Commissioners.—

Order reversed, relator restored. Opinion by

Brady, J.
###### Editorial Note on Part 572

#### Editorial Notes:

1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 572.151 General description.

(a) The 12-month-old-infant crash test dummy is described by drawings and specifications containing the following materials:

(1) Technical drawings and specifications package 921022-000 (refer to § 572.150(a)(1)), the titles of which are listed in Table A of this section;

(2) Procedures for Assembly, Disassembly and Inspection document (PADI) (refer to § 572.150(a)(2)).

(b) The dummy consists of the component assemblies set out in the following Table A:

| Component assembly | Drawing number |
| --- | --- |
| Head Assembly | 921022-001. |
| Neck Assembly (complete) | 921022-041. |
| Torso Assembly | 921022-060. |
| Leg Assembly | 921022-055 R&L. |
| Arm Assembly | 921022-054 R&L. |

Table A

(c) Adjacent segments of the dummy are joined in a manner such that, except for contacts existing under static conditions, there is no contact between metallic elements throughout the range of motion or under simulated crash impact conditions.

(d) The structural properties of the dummy are such that the dummy shall conform to this Subpart in every respect before its use in any test under this chapter.
Exhibit 31.1

                                 Certifications

I, Robert C. Shreve, Jr., certify that:

1.   I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Avatar  Systems
     Inc.;
2.   Based on my knowledge,  this  quarterly  report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to
     make the statements  made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such
     statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;
3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
     information  included  in this  quarterly  report,  fairly  present  in all
     material respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash
     flows of the  registrant  as of, and for,  the  periods  presented  in this
     quarterly report;
4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
     procedures  (as  defined in  Exchange  Act Rule  13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and I have:
     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material information relating to the registrant is made known to me by
          others within those entities,  particularly during the period in which
          this quarterly report was prepared;
     b)   evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures as of September 30, 2004 and in this  quarterly  period
          presented in this report ("Evaluation Date"); and
     c)   presented  in  this  quarterly   report  my   conclusions   about  the
          effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on the
          required evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5.   I have disclosed,  based on my most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's
     independent  registered  public  accounting firm and the audit committee of
     the registrant's  board of directors (or persons  performing the equivalent
     function):
     a)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
          identified  for  the  registrant's   independent   registered   public
          accounting firm any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
     b)   any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls; and

Date:     November 12, 2004

                /s/            Robert C. Shreve, Jr.
               ---------------------------------------------------
               Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
               (principal executive and accounting officer)
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTwo-dimensional surface strain measurement based on a variation of Yamaguchi's laser-speckle strain gaugeA novel optical method of measuring 2-D surface strain is proposed. Two linear strains along orthogonal axes and the shear strain between those axes is determined by a variation of Yamaguchi's laser-speckle strain gage technique. It offers the advantages of shorter data acquisition times, less stringent alignment requirements, and reduced decorrelation effects when compared to a previously implemented optical strain rosette technique. The method automatically cancels the translational and rotational components of rigid body motion while simplifying the optical system and improving the speed of response.Document ID19900013468Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsBarranger, John P.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryLasers And MasersReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:103162NASA-TM-103162E-5530Meeting InformationMeeting: Conference on Optical Testing and Metrology 3Location: San Diego, CACountry: United StatesStart Date: July 8, 1990End Date: July 13, 1990Sponsors:Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation EngineersAccession Number90N22784Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 582-01-11Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900013468.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 604.6 Government officials on official government business. ( a ) A recipient may provide charter service to government officials (Federal, State, and local) for official government business, which can include non-transit related purposes, if the recipient: ( 1 ) Provides the service in its geographic service area;
( 2 ) Does not generate revenue from the charter service, except as required by law; and
( 3 ) After providing such service, records the following: ( i ) The government organization's name, address, phone number, and e-mail address;
( ii ) The date and time of service;
( iii ) The number of passengers (specifically noting the number of government officials on the trip);
( iv ) The origin, destination, and trip length (miles and hours);
( v ) The fee collected, if any; and
( vi ) The vehicle number for the vehicle used to provide the service.
( b ) A recipient that provides charter service under this section shall be limited annually to 80 charter service hours for providing trips to government officials for official government business.
( c ) A recipient may petition the Administrator for additional charter service hours only if the petition contains the following information: ( 1 ) Date and description of the official government event and the number of charter service hours requested;
( 2 ) Explanation of why registered charter providers in the geographic service area cannot perform the service (e.g., equipment, time constraints, or other extenuating circumstances); and
( 3 ) Evidence that the recipient has sent the request for additional hours to registered charter providers in its geographic service area.
( d ) FTA shall post the request for additional charter service hours under this exception in the Government Officials Exception docket, docket number FTA-2007-0020 at *http://www.regulations.gov .* Interested parties may review the contents of this docket and bring questions or concerns to the attention of the Ombudsman for Charter Services. The written decision of the Administrator regarding the request for additional charter service hours shall be posted in the Government Officials Exception docket and sent to the recipient.
§ 537.9 Determination of fuel economy values and average fuel economy. ( a ) *Vehicle subconfiguration fuel economy values.* ( 1 ) For each vehicle subconfiguration for which a fuel economy value is required under paragraph (c) of this section and has been determined and approved under 40 CFR part 600, the manufacturer shall submit that fuel economy value.
( 2 ) For each vehicle subconfiguration specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section for which a fuel economy value approved under 40 CFR part 600, does not exist, but for which a fuel economy value determined under 40 CFR part 600 exists, the manufacturer shall submit that fuel economy value.
( 3 ) For each vehicle subconfiguration specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section for which a fuel economy value has been neither determined nor approved under 40 CFR part 600, the manufacturer shall submit a fuel economy value based on tests or analyses comparable to those prescribed or permitted under 40 CFR part 600 and a description of the test procedures or analytical methods used.
( 4 ) For each vehicle configuration for which a fuel economy value is required under paragraph (c) of this section and has been determined and approved under 40 CFR part 600, the manufacturer shall submit that fuel economy value.
( b ) *Base level and model type fuel economy values.* For each base level and model type, the manufacturer shall submit a fuel economy value based on the values submitted under paragraph (a) of this section and calculated in the same manner as base level and model type fuel economy values are calculated for use under subpart F of 40 CFR part 600.
( c ) *Average fuel economy.* Average fuel economy must be based upon fuel economy values calculated under paragraph (b) of this section for each model type and must be calculated in accordance with subpart F of 40 CFR part 600, except that fuel economy values for running changes and for new base levels are required only for those changes made or base levels added before the average fuel economy is required to be submitted under this part.
From: Terry Blough [mailto:tdblough@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 1:25 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options

for Participants and Beneficiaries in Retirement Plans

 

RIN 1210‐AB33

 

Departments of Labor and Treasury (The Agencies):

I am writing to express my concern regarding the The Agencies consideration of taking

steps to annuitize my privately held retirement savings.

As one who has lived in a frugal manner, well within my means, and who has

contributed regularly to private retirement savings plans, I very concerned that the

government is considering mandating how the funds will be administrated.

By requiring me to annuitize my savings, it would mean that I could not use the available

financial resources that I have set aside, throughout many years of employment, in a

manner that I deem appropriate. It means that I would not have the capability to invest

in stocks, bonds, mutual funds, or exchange traded funds as I see fit. It means that I

would not be able to use a lump sum portion of the financial resource to invest in a

small business. This proposal is a bad idea for those who have saved diligently, and who

have retirement savings well above the median account balance (as identified in the

GAO published Report GAO‐08‐8).   

In addition, the worst time to convert lump sum savings into a fixed income annuity, is

when interest rates are historically low (as they are now), so income would be

significantly lower. The proposal does not seem to address what would happen if one

dies before assets are depleted. Under the terms of many annuities, the investment will

be forfeited to the insurance company (government?), or considerably reduced by fees

or penalties. The program would likely have to be mandatory for it to be successful.

Why, I ask, is the government trying to get control of retirement funds?

This year, federal spending and the debt will create a deficit in the trillions of dollars.

Are The Agencies attempting to use my retirement savings to fund the deficit? Clearly,

infringing on my private savings is NOT the way to fund government debt. Has the

government properly managed Social Security? Medicare? Medicaid? Were the Wall

Street bailouts managed properly? The big banks still are not loaning money to

deserving businesses and consumers, and the investment bankers are once again

getting huge bonuses made possible by taxpayers.
Clearly, this proposal represents a one more bureaucratic, elitist, redistribution of

wealth, and another theft of my economic and political freedom.

Another government bureauocracy to administrate my private savings....I don’t think so.

Regards,

Terry D. Blough
#### § 578.1 Scope

This part specifies the civil penalties for violations of statutes and regulations administered by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), as adjusted for inflation. This part also sets forth NHTSA's interpretation of the civil penalty factors listed in 49 U.S.C. 30165(c). In addition, this part sets forth the requirements regarding the reasonable time and the manner of correction for a person seeking safe harbor protection from criminal liability under 49 U.S.C. 30170(a).

[81 FR 10527, Mar. 1, 2016]
March 29: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL in Syria and Iraq
 By CJTF - Operation Inherent Resolve News Release
  March 29, 2015 Release # 20150329FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **SOUTHWEST ASIA –** On March 28, Coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria, using fighter aircraft to conduct an airstrike. Separately in Iraq, Coalition military forces conducted 14 airstrikes approved by the Iraqi Ministry of Defense, using attack, fighter, bomber and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL terrorists. All strikes took place between 8 a.m., March 28, and 8 a.m., March 29, local time. The following is a summary of the strikes conducted since the last press release: **Syria** Near Kobani, an airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL vehicle. Iraq Near Bayji, an airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL fighting position. Near Fallujah, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL excavator. Near Mosul, three airstrikes struck two ISIL tactical units and destroyed two ISIL fighting positions, two ISIL vehicles, two ISIL heavy machine guns and an ISIL building. Near Tal Afar, three airstrikes struck an ISIL large tactical unit, an ISIL storage facility, an ISIL fighting position and destroyed an ISIL building and an ISIL heavy machine gun. Near Tikrit, six airstrikes struck six ISIL tactical units and destroyed an ISIL fighting position and an ISIL anti-aircraft artillery weapon.  The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria, the region, and the wider international community. The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Iraq include Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, Netherlands, United Kingdom and U.S. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Syria include Bahrain, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and U.S.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

NATHANIEL STEP H ENS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 1570

[ January 18, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventh Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael A. Usan , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 05

- 16675 CF10A

.

Nathaniel St ephens, Raiford, pro se

.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., T AYLOR and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
United States Office of Water EPA-823-F-01-029

Environmental Protection 4305 February 2002 

Agency

Fact Sheet

Summary of a Final Rule Withdrawing the Federal Designated Use

for Shields Gulch in Idaho

Summary

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has published a final rule withdrawing the

federal designated use for Shields Gulch in Idaho. 

Background

On July 31, 1997, EPA promulgated new use designations for five water bodies in the State

of Idaho, including the designation of cold water biota for Shields Gulch. On March 19, 1999,

the Idaho Mining Association challenged EPA’s promulgation in the U.S. District Court of

Idaho. On March 14, 2000, the Court found that EPA was arbitrary and capricious in

determining the attainability of the cold water biota use for Shields Gulch. Therefore, the Court

ordered that portion of the EPA rule designating Shields Gulch for cold water biota vacated and

remanded to the EPA for further consideration. To conform with the Court’s order, EPA is

withdrawing the federal cold water biota designated use for Shields Gulch.

About this Rule

This final rule withdraws the federal cold water biota designated use for Shields Gulch in

Idaho. This rule imposes no costs and will not result in additional environmental benefits. This

action will not result in a change in the level of environmental protection for Shields Gulch

because the State revised its water quality standards since EPA’s July 1997 promulgation. The

State now applies the cold water biota use to Shields Gulch as State law.

How to Get Additional Information

The full text of the Federal Register notice is available at

http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/standards on the Internet. For additional information, please

contact Rob Van Brunt, U.S. EPA, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW (4305), Washington DC, 20460,

(202) 260-2630, vanbrunt.robert@epa.gov.