37048 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

contained in the regulations are already 

approved under OMB control number 

2070–0029 (EPA ICR No. 0155.09) and 

the changes to the expiration date are 

not expected to change the covered 

activities. An agency may not conduct 

or sponsor, and a person is not required 

to respond to a collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid OMB 

control number. The OMB control 

numbers for certain EPA regulations in 

40 CFR, in addition to appearing in the 

Federal Register, are also listed in 40 

CFR part 9. 

Pursuant to section 605(b) of the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Agency hereby 

certifies that this proposed rule does not 

have a significant adverse economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities. The proposed revision that 

would synchronize the certification 

expiration dates for restricted use 

applicators is not expected to have any 

adverse economic impacts on affected 

entities, regardless of their size. In 

general, EPA strives to minimize 

potential adverse impacts on small 

entities when developing regulations to 

achieve the environmental and human 

health protection goals of the statute 

and EPA. EPA solicits comments 

specifically about potential small 

business impacts. 

State, local, and tribal governments 

are not regulated by or affected by this 

proposed rule, so it is not expected to 

affect these governments. Accordingly, 

pursuant to Title II of the Unfunded 

Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 

1531–1538), EPA has determined that 

this action is not subject to the 

requirements in sections 202 and 205 of 

UMRA because it does not contain a 

Federal mandate that may result in 

expenditures of $100 million or more 

for State, local, and tribal governments, 

in the aggregate, or for the private sector 

in any 1 year. In addition, this action 

does not significantly or uniquely affect 

small governments or impose a 

significant intergovernmental mandate, 

as described in sections 203 and 204 of 

UMRA. For the same reasons, EPA has 

determined that this proposed rule does 

not have ‘‘federalism implications’’ as 

specified in Executive Order 13132, 

entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255, 

August 10, 1999), because it would not 

have substantial direct effects on the 

States, on the relationship between the 

national government and the States, or 

on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government, as specified in the 

Order. Thus, Executive Order 13132 

does not apply to this proposed rule. 

Nor does it have ‘‘tribal implications’’ as 

specified in Executive Order 13175, 

entitled Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 

22951, November 9, 2000). Thus, 

Executive Order 13175 does not apply 

to this action. 

Since this action is not economically 

significant under Executive Order 

12866, it is not subject to Executive 

Order 13045, entitled Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, 

April 23, 1997), and Executive Order 

13211, entitled Actions Concerning 

Regulations that Significantly Affect 

Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 

FR 28355, May 22, 2001). In addition, 

EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 

as applying only to those regulatory 

actions that concern health or safety 

risks, which is not the case in this 

proposed rule. 

This action does not involve technical 

standards that would require the 

consideration of voluntary consensus 

standards pursuant to section 12(d) of 

the National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 

272 note). 

This action does not have an adverse 

impact on the environmental and health 

conditions in low-income and minority 

communities. Therefore, this action 

does not involve special consideration 

of environmental justice related issues 

as specified in Executive Order 12898, 

entitled Federal Actions to Address 

Environmental Justice in Minority 

Populations and Low-Income 

Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 

1994). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 171 

Environmental protection, Indians— 

lands, Intergovernmental relations, 

Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements. 

Dated: June 14, 2011. 

Lisa P. Jackson, 

Administrator. 

Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR 

chapter I be amended as follows: 

1. The authority citation for part 171 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136i and 136w. 

2. Amend § 171.11 by revising 

paragraph (e) to read as follows: 

§ 171.11 Federal certification of pesticide 

applicators in States or on Indian 

Reservations where there is no approved 

State or Tribal certification plan in effect. 

* * * * * 

(e) Recognition of other certificates. 

The Administrator may issue a 

certificate to an individual possessing 

any other valid Federal, State, or Tribal 

certificate without further 

demonstration of competency. The 

individual shall submit the EPA 

certification form and written evidence 

of valid certification to the appropriate 

EPA Regional Office. The Administrator 

may deny issuance of such certificate if 

the standards of competency for each 

category or subcategory identified in the 

other Federal, State, or Tribal certificate 

are not sufficiently comparable to justify 

waiving further demonstration of 

competency. The Administrator may 

revoke, suspend, or modify such 

certificate if the Federal, State, or Tribal 

certificate upon which it is based is 

revoked, suspended, or modified. 

Unless suspended or revoked, a 

certificate issued under this paragraph 

is valid until the expiration date of the 

Federal, State, or Tribal certificate. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2011–15883 Filed 6–23–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 271 

[EPA–R06–RCRA–2010–0307; FRL–9323–8] 

Louisiana; Final Authorization of State 

Hazardous Waste Management 

Program Revisions 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The State of Louisiana has 

applied to EPA for Final authorization 

of the changes to its hazardous waste 

program under the Resource 

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). 

EPA proposes to grant Final 

authorization to the State of Louisiana. 

In the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section 

of this Federal Register, EPA is 

authorizing the changes by an 

immediate final rule. EPA did not make 

a proposal prior to the immediate final 

rule because we believe this action is 

not controversial and do not expect 

comments that oppose it. We have 

explained the reasons for this 

authorization in the preamble to the 

immediate final rule. Unless we get 

written comments which oppose this 

authorization during the comment 

period, the immediate final rule will 

become effective on the date it 

establishes, and we will not take further 

action on this proposal. If we receive 

comments that oppose this action, we 

will withdraw the immediate final rule 

and it will not take effect. We will then 

respond to public comments in a later 

final rule based on this proposal. You 

may not have another opportunity for 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2011 / Proposed Rules 37049 

comment. If you want to comment on 

this action, you must do so at this time. 

DATES: Send your written comments by 

July 25, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to 

Alima Patterson, Region 6, Regional 

Authorization Coordinator, (6PD–O), 

Multimedia Planning and Permitting 

Division, at the address shown below. 

You can examine copies of the materials 

submitted by the State of Louisiana 

during normal business hours at the 

following locations: EPA Region 6, 1445 

Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733, 

phone number (214) 665–6444; or 

Louisiana Department of Environmental 

Quality, 602 N. Fifth Street, Baton 

Rouge, Louisiana 70884–2178, phone 

number (225) 219–3559. Comments may 

also be submitted electronically or 

through hand delivery/courier; please 

follow the detailed instructions in the 

ADDRESSES section of the immediate 

final rule which is located in the Rules 

section of this Federal Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alima Patterson (214) 665–8533. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

For additional information, please see 

the immediate final rule published in 

the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of 

this Federal Register. 

Dated: June 8, 2011. 

Al Armendariz, 

Regional Administrator, Region 6. 

[FR Doc. 2011–15881 Filed 6–23–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Parts 1, 2, 22, 24, 27, 90 and 

95 

[WT Docket No. 10–4; DA 11–1078] 

Improving Wireless Coverage Through 

the Use of Signal Boosters 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of 

comment period. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission extends the deadlines for 

filing comments and reply comments on 

the Commission’s Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking (NPRM), in this proceeding, 

which was published in the Federal 

Register on Tuesday, May 10, 2011. 

DATES: The comment period for the 

proposed rule published May 10, 2011 

(76 FR 26983), is extended. Submit 

comments on or before July 25, 2011, 

and reply comments on or before 

August 24, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by WT Docket No. 10–4; FCC 

11–53, by any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Federal Communications 

Commission’s Web Site: http:// 

www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• People with Disabilities: Contact the 

FCC to request reasonable 

accommodations (accessible format 

documents, sign language interpreters, 

CART, etc.) by e-mail: FCC504@fcc.gov 

or phone 202–418–0530 or TTY: 202– 

418–0432. 

For detailed instructions for submitting 

comments and additional information 

on the rulemaking process, see the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 

this document. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joyce Jones, Mobility Division, Wireless 

Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 

418–1327, or e-mail at 

joyce.jones@fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

summary of the Commission’s Order 

(‘‘Order’’) in WT Docket No. 10–4, DA 

11–1078, adopted and released on June 

20, 2011, which extends the comment 

and reply comment filing deadlines 

established in the NPRM published 

under FCC No. 11–53 at 76 FR 26983, 

May 10, 2011. The full text of this 

document is available for inspection 

and copying during normal business 

hours in the FCC Reference Center, 445 

12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 

20554. The complete text may be 

purchased from the Commission’s copy 

contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 

445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402, 

Washington, DC 20554. The full text 

may also be downloaded at: http:// 

www.fcc.gov. Alternative formats are 

available to persons with disabilities by 

sending an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or 

by calling the Consumer & 

Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202– 

418–0530 (voice), 202–418–0432 (tty). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

1. In this document, the Commission 

addresses a joint motion filed by Wilson 

Electronics, Inc. and Verizon Wireless 

(filed June 16, 2011) requesting a thirtyday extension of the time period to file 

comments in this rulemaking to allow 

them additional time to ‘‘work through 

the many complicated technical issues 

presented’’ and ‘‘work towards a 

solution that has the potential to benefit 

both booster manufacturers and wireless 

carriers.’’ The Commission, in this 

instance, finds that providing a limited 

extension will serve the public interest 

by allowing parties to discuss the 

complex technical issues at stake and 

develop consensus approaches that 

benefit consumers, and is therefore 

extending the deadline for all comments 

and reply comments to July 25, and 

August 24, 2011, respectively. 

Ordering Clauses 

2. Pursuant to section 4(i) of the 

Communications Act of 1934, as 

amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), and section 

1.46 of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 

1.46, the joint request of Wilson 

Electronics, Inc. and Verizon Wireless, 

filed on June 16, 2011, is Granted and 

the deadline for filing comments in 

response to the NPRM is Extended to 

July 25, 2011, and the deadline for filing 

reply comments is Extended to August 

24, 2011. 

3. This action is taken under 

delegated authority pursuant to sections 

0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission’s 

rules, 47 CFR 0.131, 0.331. 

4. A copy of the NPRM, including the 

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, 

Has Been Sent to the Chief Counsel of 

Advocacy of the Small Business 

Administration. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Michael McKenzie, 

Deputy Chief, Wireless Telecommunications 

Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 2011–15895 Filed 6–23–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[DA 11–867; MB Docket No. 11–87; RM– 

11628] 

Radio Broadcasting Services; Bastrop, 

LA 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: This document requests 

comments on a petition for rulemaking 

filed by Kenneth W. Diebel, licensee of 

FM Station KGGM, Channel 228A, 

Delhi, Louisiana, proposing the 

substitution of FM Channel 228A for 

vacant FM Channel 230A at Bastrop, 

Louisiana. The proposed substitution of 

Channel 228A at Bastrop accommodates 

the hybrid application, which requests 

the substitution of Channel 230C3 for 

Channel 228A at Delphi, Louisiana. See 

File No. BNPH–20110214ADS. A staff 

engineering analysis indicates that 

Channel 228A can be allotted to Bastrop 

consistent with the minimum distance 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS