alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 574

#### Editorial Note:

An interpretation of manufacturer's designee issued by NHTSA and published at 36 FR 9780, May 28, 1971, provides as follows:

“A request for an interpretation has been received from the Rubber Manufacturers Association asking that it be made clear that, under the Tire Identification and Recordkeeping Regulation (part 574), particularly §§ 574.7 and 574.8, only the tire manufacturer, brand name owner, or retreader may designate a third party to provide the necessary recording forms or to maintain the records required by the regulation.

“Another person has requested an interpretation concerning the questions whether: (1) A tire manufacturer, brand name owner or retreader may designate one or more persons to be its designee for the purpose of maintaining the information, (2) an independent distributor or dealer may select a designee for the retention of the manufacturer's records, provided the manufacturer approves the designation, and (3) the independent distributor or dealer may seek administrative relief in the event he believes the information retained by the manufacturer is being used to his detriment.

“Under section 113(f) of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 1402(f) and part 574, it is the tire manufacturer who has the ultimate responsibility for maintaining the records of first purchasers. Therefore, it is the tire manufacturer or his designee who must maintain these records. The term *designee,* as used in the regulation, was not intended to preclude multiple designees; if the tire manufacturer desires, he may designate more than one person to maintain the required information. Furthermore, neither the Act nor the regulation prohibits the distributor or dealer from being the manufacturer's designee nor do they prohibit a distributor or dealer from selecting someone to be the manufacturer's designee provided the manufacturer approves of the selection.

“With respect to the possibility of manufacturers using the maintained information to the detriment of a distributor or dealer, the NHTSA will of course investigate claims by distributors or dealers of alleged misconduct and, if the maintained information is being misused, take appropriate action.

“Issued under the authority of sections 103, 113, and 119 of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act, 15 U.S.C. 1392, 1402, and 1407, and the delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.51.”

#### § 574.2 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to facilitate notification to purchasers of defective or nonconforming tires, pursuant to Sections 30118 and 30119 of Title 49, United States Code, so that they may take appropriate action in the interest of motor vehicle safety.

[61 FR 29495, June 11, 1996]
#### § 674.3 Applicability.

This part applies to States with rail fixed guideway public transportation systems; State safety oversight agencies that oversee the safety of rail fixed guideway public transportation systems; and entities that own or operate rail fixed guideway public transportation systems with Federal financial assistance authorized under 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53.
From: Jim Welch [mailto:JWelch@dynaxys.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 11:01 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

September 16, 2015

I would like to direct your attention to a paper in the current issue of the Journal of Personal Finance, an 

academic journal, located at http://www.iarfc.org/documents/issues/Vol.14Issue2.pdf.

The paper is Financial Planning Research Needs--A Practitioner’s View by Joseph A. Tomlinson. Two 

things jumped out at me from the article:

1. Financial Advisors have high monetary incentives to sell annuities of all kinds, particularly to 

recent retirees who are trying to figure out what to do with their 401K.

2. Financial Advisors prefer to provide their services to the rich. The working class is largely 

unserved.

3. Not in the article, but observed by me, is that Financial Advisors are not interested in the 

decumulation phase of retirement, when the account is shrinking. They are looking to market 

their services to the younger, accumulators.
§ 655.2 Overview. ( a ) This part includes nine subparts. Subpart A of this part covers the general requirements of FTA's drug and alcohol testing programs. Subpart B of this part specifies the basic requirements of each employer's alcohol misuse and prohibited drug use program, including the elements required to be in each employer's testing program. Subpart C of this part describes prohibited drug use. Subpart D of this part describes prohibited alcohol use. Subpart E of this part describes the types of alcohol and drug tests to be conducted. Subpart F of this part addresses the testing procedural requirements mandated by the Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act of 1991, and as required in 49 CFR Part 40. Subpart G of this part lists the consequences for covered employees who engage in alcohol misuse or prohibited drug use. Subpart H of this part contains administrative matters, such as reports and recordkeeping requirements. Subpart I of this part specifies how a recipient certifies compliance with the rule.
( b ) This part must be read in conjunction with 49 CFR Part 40, Procedures for Transportation Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs.
§ 604.23 Effect of a cease and desist order. ( a ) Issuance of a cease and desist order against a recipient shall be considered as an aggravating factor in determining the remedy to impose against the recipient in future findings of noncompliance with this part, if the recipient provides the service described in the cease and desist order issued by the Chief Counsel.
( b ) In determining whether to grant the request for a cease and desist order, the Chief Counsel shall consider the specific facts shown in the signed, sworn request for a cease and desist order, applicable statutes and regulations, and any other information that is relevant to the request.
#### § 585.56 Records.

Each manufacturer shall maintain records of the tire identification number for each vehicle for which information is reported under § 585.55(b)(2) until December 31, 2008.
----

**EXHIBIT      32.6**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                March 14, 2006 | By:    | /s/                Charles N. Eldred       |
|-------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|                                |   | Charles                N. Eldred           |
|                                |   | Senior                Vice President,      |
|                                |   | and                Chief Financial Officer |
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPassive dynamic controllers for nonlinear mechanical systemsA methodology for model-independant controller design for controlling large angular motion of multi-body dynamic systems is outlined. The controlled system may consist of rigid and flexible components that undergo large rigid body motion and small elastic deformations. Control forces/torques are applied to drive the system and at the same time suppress the vibration due to flexibility of the components. The proposed controller consists of passive second-order systems which may be designed with little knowledge of the system parameter, even if the controlled system is nonlinear. Under rather general assumptions, the passive design assures that the closed loop system has guaranteed stability properties. Unlike positive real controller design, stabilization can be accomplished without direct velocity feedback. In addition, the second-order passive design allows dynamic feedback controllers with considerable freedom to tune for desired system response, and to avoid actuator saturation. After developing the basic mathematical formulation of the design methodology, simulation results are presented to illustrate the proposed approach to a flexible six-degree-of-freedom manipulator.Document ID19910012260Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsJuang, Jer-Nan*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Wu, Shih-Chin*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Phan, Minh*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Longman, Richard W.*(Columbia Univ. New York, NY., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1991Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-104047NAS 1.15:104047Meeting InformationMeeting: Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials ConferenceLocation: Baltimore, MDCountry: United StatesStart Date: April 8, 1991End Date: April 10, 1991Accession Number91N21573Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 590-14-21-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910012260.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
GL0503

BART

NK, MA, RANKING

SPENCERBACHUS. AL CHARMAN nite States House of Representatives

Conunittee on Financial Services
Washington, B.C. 20515

September 15, 2011

The Honorable Hilda Solis
Secretary

U.S. Department of Labor
S-2018

200 Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20210

Dear Secretary Solis:

As you are aware, there has been a great deal of legislative activity over the last several
years to address the many issues raised by the financial crisis. Financial reform legislation
adopted last year is an important part of this activity, including particularly new or
improved regulation of derivatives market participants and of securities broker-dealers.
The Department of Labor has proposed rules that interact in important ways with the
activities of both of these groups of market participants, as well as those of investors,
pension funds, and others.

L agree that ERISA rules may need to be updated. But it is important to do this in a way
that does not have adverse effects on the choices available to consumers, municipalities,
and pension plans, among others. Given this, I strongly urge you to withdraw and re-
propose your rule, in coordination with both the Securities and Exchange Commission and
the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Making another attempt to address the many issues that have been raised will ultimately
improve the rule and ease implementation for all concerned.

12 das [ue
G3AIF903y

1d:€ Wd
Hillsborough,

June, 1900.

#### Turley *v.*Boston & Maine Railroad.

The master is not liable for an act of his servant beyond the scope of the latter’s employment, which was hot directed by the master or occasioned by any fault on his part. ,

Case, for injuries received by being shot while in the defendants’ freight yard in Manchester, by Thomas J. Saxton, an employee of the defendants.

The plaintiff testified that he went to the freight yard oh January 15, 1899, as he had frequently done, to see if there were cars of coal consigned to local dealers, so that he might apply for a job of shoveling. While in the yard he heard shouting and saw men running. Saxton walked up to him, seized lfim', asked Mm where he was going, and started to draw a black-jack, whereupon the plaintiff broke away and ran about a hundred feet, when he was shot m the back. He made no assault upon Saxton.

Saxton testified that he was employed by the defendants to clean and care for the lamps in the freight yard. Prior to the day of the shooting, he had driven from the yard certain persons, denominated the “scut beer gang,” whose habit it.was to loiter there, and who had fought with him and made threats against him. He *349reported these affrays to the defendants’ agent, and was told to look out for himself. On January 15, 1899, Saxton saw members of the “ beer gang,” the plaintiff being’ one of the party, going toward the freight'yard. He followed them and found the plaintiff on the watch. After an unsuccessful attempt to seize the plaintiff, Saxton ran down the yard, and seeing others gathering, apparently to make a fight, fired a revolver at the end of a freight car for the purpose of frightening the crowd and protecting himself. He did not think the bullet could have hit the plaintiff. Saxton was not an officer or a watchman. He had no orders to drive the “ beer gang ” from the freight yard, and was required only to report their presence there; but whenever he saw them going to the yard it was his practice to follow them and order them off the defendants’ premises.

At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence a nonsuit was ordered, subject to his exception.

*Sullivan*& *Broderick,*for the plaintiff.

*Oliver E. Branch*and *Cyrus E. Little,*for the defendants.

Parsons, J.

As there was no evidence tending to show that the shooting of the plaintiff by Saxton resulted from any fault of the defendants, was directed by them or done by their authority, or was any part of Saxton’s work of cleaning and caring for the lamps in the yard, for which he was employed and which was the sole capacity in which he represented the defendants, it cannot be found that the act of Saxton complained of, whether willful or negligent, was the defendants’ act, or within the scope of Saxton’s employment by them. *McGill*v. *Granite Co., ante, p.*125; *Rowell*v. *Railroad,*68 N. H. 358; *Andrews*v. *Green,*62 N. H. 436; *Wilson*v. *Peverly,*2 N. H. 548.

*Exception overruled: judgment for the defendants.*

Peaslee, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Alfacell  Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Robert D. Love,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: December 12, 2005

                                      /s/ Robert D. Love
                                      ------------------
                                      Name:  Robert D. Love
                                      Title: Chief Financial Officer
                                             (Principal Financial Officer
                                             and Chief Accounting Officer)

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Alfacell  Corporation  and will be retained by Alfacell  Corporation
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.
SERVED DECEMBER 13, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

^ IN THE MATTER OF 

]l SUSAN RICHARDSON 

FAA DOCKET NO. CPIONMOO13 

y-l (Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS NO. FAA-2010-1210 

:p&p-n ^.RlMENTO i F 

-V^;SP0RWI0N 

"r'^T OPERA' " 

CiO DEC ! 3 P 2: U I 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2010NM730034) has been 

assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and 

other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA 

Hearing Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative La^rjftiSge 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP10NM00I3 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W, 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Susan Richardson, Respondent 

11987 N. County Road T 

Hayward, WI 54843 

Glenn H. Brown, Complainant's Counsel 

Senior Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel, AAL-7 

Alaskan Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

222 West 7* Avenue, #14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

TEL: 907-271-5271 

FAX: 907-271-2800 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 

2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
1210-AB32-2-1368.html[7/26/2015 2:34:36 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jw0-eobm

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1864

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Michael Roberson

Address:

412 grove ave se

lindale, GA,

Email: scaffoldgod69@yahoo.com

Phone: 706 237 4025

General Comment

I'm smart enough to handle all of my personal affairs including my retirement.
#### Elizabeth A. Baxter. Plaintiff, v. Rebecca Stickler and others, Defendants.

Order reversed, with costs and disbursements, and motion denied. Opinion by Barnard, P. J. ; Dykman, J., not sitting.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hamptons Luxury Homes, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Roy Dalene, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Roy Dalene



Roy Dalene

Chief Executive Officer

September 12, 2005
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 996

To ensure the timely payment of benefits to eligible persons under the

Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (42 U.S.C. 2210 note).

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 13, 2001

Mr. MCINNIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Appropriations

A BILL

To ensure the timely payment of benefits to eligible persons

under the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (42

U.S.C. 2210 note).

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RADIATION EXPOSURE COMPENSATION TRUST

4 FUND.

5 (a) APPROPRIATIONS.—There are appropriated, out

6 of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated,

7 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2001,

8 $84,000,000 to the Radiation Exposure Compensation

9 Trust Fund to remain available until expended for the

10 purpose of making payments to eligible beneficiaries under
2

•HR 996 IH

1 the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (42 U.S.C.

2 2210 note).

3 (b) EMERGENCY REQUIREMENT.—The entire amount

4 made available under subsection (a)—

5 (1) shall be available only to the extent that the

6 President submits to Congress an official budget re7 quest for up to $84,000,000 that includes designa8 tion of the entire amount of the request as an emer9 gency requirement for the purposes of the Balanced

10 Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985

11 (2 U.S.C. 900 et seq.); and

12 (2) is designated by Congress as an emergency

13 requirement under section 251(b)(2)(A) of the Bal14 anced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of

15 1985 (2 U.S.C. 901(b)(2)(A)).

Æ
H. Res. 305

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

December 6, 2001.

Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on the

legislative day of Thursday, December 6, 2001, for the

Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the

rules relating to the following measures:

(1) The bill (H.R. 3008) to reauthorize the trade

adjustment assistance program under the Trade Act of

1974.

(2) The bill (H.R. 3129) to authorize appropriations for fiscal years 2002 and 2003 for the United

States Customs Service for antiterrorism, drug interdiction, and other operations, for the Office of the United

States Trade Representative, for the United States

International Trade Commission, and for other purposes.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### Thomas S. Kelly, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. The Coney Island and Brooklyn Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order denying new trial reversed, and new trial cosis to abide event. Opinion by

P.

Dykman, J., not sitting.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Ken Randell Blackmer, * From the 2 9 th District Court

of Palo Pinto County

Trial Court No. 1603 2

.

Vs. No. 11

- 1 7

- 00 1 2 7

- CR * May 9

, 2019

The Sta te of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Stretcher , J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.

, Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.