alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 552.12 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart, the following definitions apply: ( a ) *Dynamic automatic suppression system (DASS)* means a portion of an air bag system that automatically controls whether or not the air bag deploys during a crash by: ( 1 ) Sensing the location of an occupant, moving or still, in relation to the air bag;
( 2 ) Interpreting the occupant characteristics and location information to determine whether or not the air bag should deploy; and
( 3 ) Activating or suppressing the air bag system based on the interpretation of characteristics and occupant location information.
( b ) *Automatic suppression zone (ASZ)* means a three-dimensional zone adjacent to the air bag cover, specified by the vehicle manufacturer, where air bag deployment will be suppressed by the DASS if a vehicle occupant enters the zone under specified conditions.
( c ) *Standard No. 208* means 49 CFR 571.208.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0606.html[7/21/2015 7:04:59 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-onoq

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0606

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Deanna Barton

Address:

14877 77th street ne

otsego, MN, 55330

Email: deanna1211@hotmail.com

Phone: 763-421-3059

General Comment

I am smart enough to save for my own retirement, and I am smart enough to plan my own retirement. Leave my

 401K alone! Leave our IRAs alone!
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7749

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ALFRED BUENSALIDA, a/k/a JJ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. 

(8:11-cr-00061-RWT-1; 8:14-cv-03533-RWT)

Submitted: April 20, 2016 Decided: May 6, 2016

Before KING, GREGORY, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alfred Buensalida, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Packard, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Alfred Buensalida seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Buensalida has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPassive damping concepts for tubular beams with partial rotational and translational end restraintsThe main objectives of the study are: (1) identification of potential passive damping concepts for slender tubular structural members with rotational and translational end springs under natural and forced-free vibrations; (2) evaluation of damping efficiencies of the various damping concepts; and (3) evaluation of the suitability of a theoretical finite difference analysis by comparison to the experimental results for the case of natural vibrations. Only member flexural an translation motion is considered. The natural vibration study is conducted on the seven damping concepts and for only one specific initial deflection. The most suitable of the seven dampers is further investigated under forced-free vibrations. In addition only one set of end springs is used for all of the experiments. The results show that passive damping provides a possible approach to structural vibration reduction.Document ID19910007098Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsRazzaq, Zia*(Old Dominion Univ. Norfolk, VA, United States)*Muyundo, David K.*(Old Dominion Univ. Norfolk, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1991Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:187833NASA-CR-187833Accession Number91N16411Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-336Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910007098.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# CENTCOM Forces Capture ISIS Operative in Helicopter Raid

/ Published April 12, 2023

Apr. 12, 2023

Release Number 20230412-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla.**– U.S. Central Command forces conducted a helicopter raid in eastern Syria late on the evening of April 8, capturing Hudayfah al Yemeni, an ISIS attack facilitator, and two of his associates. No civilians were killed or injured.

The capture of Hudayfah al Yemeni and his associates will disrupt the organization's ability to plot and carry out operations.

“Operations against ISIS are important for the security and stability of the region,” said Col. Joe Buccino, a CENTCOM spokesperson. “ISIS remains a threat to the region and beyond – the group retains the capability to conduct operations in Iraq and Syria with a desire to strike beyond the Middle East, and its vile ideology remains a threat. Operations such as this one reaffirms our commitment to the enduring defeat of ISIS.”

-30-
V

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2258

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel RAFFLES LIGHT.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 4, 1995

Mr. ZELIFF introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

RAFFLES LIGHT.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886

5 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 46,

6 United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may

7 issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate en8 dorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the
2

•HR 2258 IH

1 vessel RAFFLES LIGHT (United States official number

2 501584).

Æ
SHAPING AMERICA’S RETIREMENT

714 HOPMEADOW ST., SUITE 3  SIMSBURY, CT. 06070

 

Submitted Electronically

January 20, 2011 

Office of Regulations and Interpretations 

Employee Benefits Security Administration 

U.S. Department of Labor 

200 Constitution Ave., NW 

Washington, DC 20210 

Re: Fiduciary Definition Hearing - Request to Testify

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

The SPARK Institute, Inc.1

 respectfully requests the opportunity to testify before the Employee 

Benefits Security Administration’s (“EBSA”) hearings on the proposed definition of fiduciary 

regulation (the “Proposal”). The combined expertise of our members, who include the largest 

retirement plan service and investment providers, will allow us to provide valuable, unique and 

insightful testimony. 

 

We respectfully request the opportunity to testify about our concerns and suggestions regarding 

the following: 

(1) The implications of the Proposal for service providers, including: 

a. Our general concerns that the threshold for when a service provider will be considered a 

fiduciary would be substantially lower, and in many instances, significantly unclear. As a 

result, service providers will be at substantially increased risk of unintentionally and 

 

1

 The SPARK Institute represents the interests of a broad based cross section of retirement plan service providers 

and investment managers, including banks, mutual fund companies, insurance companies, third party 

administrators, trade clearing firms and benefits consultants. Members include most of the largest firms that 

provide record keeping services to employer-sponsored retirement plans, ranging from one-participant programs 

to plans that cover tens of thousands of employees. The combined membership services approximately 70 million 

employer-sponsored plan participants. 
SHAPING AMERICA’S RETIREMENT 2

unwillingly becoming fiduciaries and engaging in inadvertent prohibited transactions. 

We will also discuss our recommendations for modifications or a safe harbor under any 

final rule. 

b. Our concerns regarding the impact on service provider investment platforms that include 

substantial proprietary and non-proprietary funds as investment options. More 

specifically, we are concerned about platform providers’ ability to continue to offer broad 

investment choices and to be able to provide non-fiduciary guidance, education, and tools 

to assist plan fiduciaries narrow down their choices, and to respond to questions in RFPs 

about fund choices, among other concerns. 

c. The approach and scope of the “seller’s exception” under the Proposal. 

d. The implications for service providers of providing certain asset values on participant 

statements. 

(2) EBSA’s request for comments regarding distribution counseling. 

The SPARK Institute appreciates EBSA’s consideration of this request and we look forward to 

the opportunity to testify at the hearings. If you have any questions or need additional 

information regarding this request, please feel free to contact us at (704) 987-0533. 

Respectfully, 

 

Larry H. Goldbrum 

General Counsel
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Robert C. Bateman, Chief Financial Officer of Fisher Communications, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fisher Communications, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for theregistrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 8, 2004
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fact Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jacqueline Danforth, President and Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  May 14, 2007

By:  /s/ Jacqueline Danforth

Name:  Jacqueline Danforth

Title:    President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal

Accounting Officer)
#### § 9.5 General prohibition of production or disclosure in legal proceedings.

No employee of the Department may provide testimony or produce any material contained in the files of the Department, or disclose any information relating to, or based upon, material contained in the files of the Department, or disclose any information or produce any material acquired as part of the performance of that employee's official duties or because of that employee's official status unless authorized in accordance with this part, or by other applicable law.
# CENTCOM Commander visits Baghdad

/ Published Feb. 8, 2023

Feb. 7,2023

Release Number 20230202-02

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla.**– From Feb. 7 to 8, General Michael “Erik” Kurilla, commander of U.S. Central Command, visited Baghdad as part of a multi-country visit to the Middle East. Kurilla met with Prime Minister al-Sudani and the commander of Joint Operations Command for Iraq, Lt. Gen. Qais Al-Muhammadawi AI-Abbasi. The leaders discussed the current security situation in Iraq and the progress of the Iraqi Security Forces in their fight against ISIS.

While in Baghdad, Kurilla also met with the leadership from the Combined Joint Task Force – Operation Inherent Resolve to discuss threats, ongoing operations, and the mission to ensure the enduring defeat of ISIS.

After the visit, Kurilla issued this statement:

“This short visit crystallized the progress we continued to make in the fight against ISIS in Iraq and Syria and the work that remains ahead. Alongside our partners in the Syrian Democratic Forces, we continue to put pressure on ISIS in Syria. In Iraq, we continue to advise, assist, and enable the Iraqi Security Forces in the fight against ISIS.

“Territorially, ISIS is defeated and incapable of holding large swaths of land. However, ISIS remains a threat and its vile ideology remains uncontained and unconstrained. ISIS continues to represent a threat to not only Iraq and Syria, but to the stability and security of the region. Therefore, we must continue the fight against ISIS alongside our partners.”

-30-
#### § 585.83 Applicability.

This subpart applies to manufacturers of passenger cars, multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks, and buses with a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) or less. However, this subpart does not apply to manufacturers whose production consists exclusively of vehicles manufactured in two or more stages, and vehicles that are altered after previously having been certified in accordance with part 567 of this chapter. In addition, this subpart does not apply to manufacturers whose production of motor vehicles for the United States market is less than 5,000 vehicles in a production year.
----

(2004/C 84 E/0890)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0452/04

by Raffaele Costa (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(23 February 2004)

Subject:   INFO 2000 programme

The multiannual Community programme INFO 2000, covering a period of four years, aimed to encourage the development of the European multimedia content industry and to contribute to the professional, social and cultural development of European citizens.

Can the Commission indicate what actions to support the programme have been initiated, giving details of the sums allocated?

Answer given by Mr Liikanen on behalf of the Commission

(11 March 2004)

The INFO 2000 programme to stimulate the supply and use of multimedia was adopted in 1996 (1) and ended in 1999. A final evaluation of the programme and its impact assessment was carried out in the year 2000. The results were communicated to the Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions in May 2001 (2). The evaluation report is available at: (http://www.cordis.lu/econtent/studies/studies.htm). In the four years of the programme implementation, 149 actions were supported for EUR 68,6 million, broken down as follows:

Expenditure under the INFO 2000 Programme (1996-1999)

----

(1)  Council Decision 96/339/EC of 20 May 1996 adopting a multi-annual Community programme to stimulate the development of a European multimedia content industry and to encourage the use of multimedia content in the emerging information society (INFO 2000), OJ L 129, 30.5.1996.

(2)  COM(2001) 276 final.

----
**EXHIBIT
        23.2**
  **CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
   We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
        333-53367 and 333-106079 on Form S-3 of our reports dated February 28, 2007
        (which express an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph
        regarding the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Financial
        Interpretation No. 47, *Accounting
        for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations* in 2005
        and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), *Share-Based
        Payment* and
        Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, *Employers'
        Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an
        amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132R* in
        2006),
        relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
        schedule of Public Service Company of New Mexico and subsidiary and management's
        report of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
        appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Public Service Company of
        New
        Mexico and subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 2006.
   
 /S/
        DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
  Dallas,
        Texas
 February
        28, 2007
IV

House Calendar No. 171

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 440

[Report No. 107–504]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4019) to provide that the marriage penalty relief provisions of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief

Reconciliation Act of 2001 shall be permanent.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 11, 2002

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered

to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4019) to provide

that the marriage penalty relief provisions of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001

shall be permanent.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R.

3 4019) to provide that the marriage penalty relief provi4 sions of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconcili5 ation Act of 2001 shall be permanent. The bill shall be
2

HRES 440 RH

1 considered as read for amendment. The previous question

2 shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on any

3 amendment thereto to final passage without intervening

4 motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill equally

5 divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking mi6 nority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; (2)

7 the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in

8 the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this

9 resolution, if offered by Representative Rangel of New

10 York or his designee, which shall be in order without inter11 vention of any point of order, shall be considered as read,

12 and shall be separately debatable for one hour equally di13 vided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent;

14 and (3) one motion to recommit with or without instruc15 tions.

House Calendar No. 171

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 440

[Report No. 107–504]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4019)

to provide that the marriage penalty relief provisions of the Economic Growth and Tax ReliefReconciliation Act of 2001 shall be permanent.

JUNE 11, 2002

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
#### § 826.39 Judicial review.

Judicial review of final Board decisions on awards may be sought as provided in 5 U.S.C. 504(c)(2).