alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 604.40 Public disclosure of evidence. ( a ) Except as provided in this section, the hearing shall be open to the public.
( b ) The PO may order that any information contained in the record be withheld from public disclosure. Any person may object to disclosure of information in the record by filing a written motion to withhold specific information with the PO. The person shall state specific grounds for nondisclosure in the motion.
( c ) The PO shall grant the motion to withhold information from public disclosure if the PO determines that disclosure would be in violation of the Privacy Act, would reveal trade secrets or privileged or confidential commercial or financial information, or is otherwise prohibited by law.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAutonomous space processor for orbital debrisAdvanced designs are being continued to develop the ultimate goal of a GETAWAY special to demonstrate economical removal of orbital debris utilizing local resources in orbit. The fundamental technical feasibility was demonstrated in 1988 through theoretical calculations, quantitative computer animation, a solar focal point cutter, a robotic arm design and a subcase model. Last year improvements were made to the solar cutter and the robotic arm. Also performed last year was a mission analysis which showed the feasibility of retrieve at least four large (greater than 1500 kg) pieces of debris. Advances made during this reporting period are the incorporation of digital control with the existing placement arm, the development of a new robotic manipulator arm, and the study of debris spin attenuation. These advances are discussed.Document ID19900016728Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsRamohalli, Kumar*(Arizona Univ. Tucson, AZ, United States)*Campbell, David*(Arizona Univ. Tucson, AZ, United States)*Marine, Micky*(Arizona Univ. Tucson, AZ, United States)*Saad, Mohamad*(Arizona Univ. Tucson, AZ, United States)*Bertles, Daniel*(Arizona Univ. Tucson, AZ, United States)*Nichols, Dave*(Arizona Univ. Tucson, AZ, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:186691NASA-CR-186691Meeting InformationMeeting: Universities Space Research Association Summer ConferenceLocation: Cleveland, OHCountry: United StatesStart Date: June 12, 1990End Date: June 15, 1990Accession Number90N26044Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NASW-4435Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900016728.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 585.31 Scope.

This part establishes requirements for manufacturers of passenger cars, and of trucks, buses and multipurpose passenger vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of 3,856 kilograms (kg) (8,500 pounds (lb)) or less, to submit a report, and maintain records related to the report, concerning the number of such vehicles that are certified as complying with S19, S21, and S23 of FMVSS No. 208 (49 CFR 571.208) when using the child restraint systems specified in Appendix A-1 of this standard.
EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Hamptons Luxury Homes, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Frank Dalene, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

November 13, 2007

*/s/ Frank Dalene                         *

Frank Dalene

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
#### In the Matter of the Application of James Kane, Appellant, for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus against William J. Gaynor, as Mayor of the City of New York, Respondent.

*Matter of Kane*v. Gaynor, 144 App. Div. 196, affirmed.

(Argued May 31, 1911;

decided June 16, 1911.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 28, 1911, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus *616to compel defendant to appoint the petitioner to the office of commissioner of elections of the city of New York.

*Charles H. Kelby*for appellant.

*Archibald R. Watson, Corporation Counsel (Terence Farley*and *Louis H. Hahlo*of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Burr, J., below.

Concur: Gray, Haight, Werner, Chase and Collin, JJ.; Cullen, Ch. J., and Willard Bartlett, J., concur ih result.
Exhibit 32-7



Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code



The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Report on Form 10-K of Exelon Generation Company, LLC for the year ended December
31, 2004, that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Exelon Generation Company, LLC.



|                           |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  |                        
|-------------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                           |  |  | 
|Date:    February 23, 2005 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    JOHN F. YOUNG
|                           |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  | John F. Young President
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0775.html[7/21/2015 12:22:44 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-2rjs

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0775

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Howard Lisech

General Comment

Leave my 401k alone.
§ 611.101 Purpose and contents. ( a ) This part prescribes the process that applicants must follow to be considered eligible for fixed guideway capital investment grants for a new fixed guideway, an extension to a fixed guideway, or a corridor-based bus rapid transit system (known as New Starts and Small Starts). Also, this part prescribes the procedures used by FTA to evaluate and rate proposed New Starts projects as required by 49 U.S.C. 5309(d) and Small Starts projects as required by 49 U.S.C. 5309(h).
( b ) This part defines how the results of the evaluation described in paragraph (a) of this section will be used to: ( 1 ) Rate projects as “high,” “medium-high,” “medium,” “medium-low” or “low” as required by 49 U.S.C. 5309(g)(2)(A) and 49 U.S.C. 5309(h)(6);
( 2 ) Assign individual ratings for each of the project justification criteria specified in 49 U.S.C. 5309(d)(2)(B) and 49 U.S.C. 5309(h)(6);
( 3 ) Determine project eligibility for Federal funding commitments, in the form of full funding grant agreements (FFGA) for New Starts projects and expedited grant agreements (EGA) for Small Starts projects; and
( 4 ) Support funding recommendations for the New Starts and Small Starts programs for the President's annual budget request.
( c ) The information collected and ratings developed under this part will form the basis for the *Annual Report on Funding Recommendations,* required by 49 U.S.C. 5309(o)(1).
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00029

- CR

E X PARTE Z ACHARY D IXON P ARKER §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 43rd Distr ict Court

of Parker County ( CV23

- 0098 )

April 13, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered tha t the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Brian Walker

Justice Brian Walker
http://www.financialservices.org/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1441.html[7/23/2015 11:00:36 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvo-1gk4

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1441

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

 If adopted, these proposals would allow certain broker-dealers, insurance agents, and others that act as

 investment advice 

fiduciaries to continue to receive many common forms of compensation that otherwise would be prohibited as

 conflicts of 

interest.

The statement immediately above is a problem. Do not allow the conflicts of interest.

The proposed rule, and related exemptions, would increase consumer protection for plan sponsors, fiduciaries,

 participants,

 beneficiaries, and IRA owners.

The statement immediately above is good. Do provide more protections from consumer legal actions.
# EUR-Lex - 52004BP0344 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52004BP0344

**Resolution of the European Parliament containing the comments accompanying the decision concerning discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the 2002 financial year — Section VIII — Ombudsman **

*
Official Journal L 330 , 04/11/2004 P. 0157 - 0157 Official Journal L 330 , 04/11/2004 P. 0022 - 0022 *

Resolution

of the European Parliament containing the comments accompanying the decision concerning discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the 2002 financial year — Section VIII — Ombudsman

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

having regard to the revenue and expenditure account and balance sheet for the 2002 financial year (I5-0034/2003 — C5-0088/2004),

having regard to the Annual Report of the European Court of Auditors for the 2002 financial year, together with the replies of the institutions (C5-0583/2003) [1],

having regard to the statement of assurance by the European Court of Auditors, pursuant to Article 248 of the EC Treaty, as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions (C5-0583/2003),

having regard to the Council's recommendation of 9 March 2004 (C5-0145/2004),

having regard to Article 272(10) and Article 275 of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Article 22(2) and (3) of the Financial Regulation of 21 December 1977 [2] and Article 50 of the Financial Regulation of 25 June 2002 [3],

having regard to Rule 93 a of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A5-0228/2004),

1. Notes the replies given by the Ombudsman on 15 December 2003 to the questionnaire sent by the Committee on Budgetary Control on 26 November 2003;

2. Considers it reasonable that the Ombudsman has concluded an agreement with Parliament on cooperation on administrative, budgetary and financial matters;

3. Acknowledges that the Ombudsman is looking for a low-cost way of regularly travelling to Frankfurt am Main and Zurich airports; asks the Ombudsman to notify Parliament as to what solution he prefers; asks Parliament, at the same time, to consider to what extent it can be of assistance to him;

4. Welcomes the Financial Controller's confirmation that the Ombudsman's financial management for 2001 and 2002 was satisfactory;

5. Also welcomes the fact that the Internal Auditor will carry out a critical review of the new financial management structures and procedures for the financial year 2003;

6. Welcomes the fact that the Ombudsman has undertaken to forward to the discharge authority the annual activity report drawn up by the principal authorising officer.

[1] OJ C 286, 28.11.2003, p. 1.

[2] OJ L 356, 31.12.1977, p. 1.

[3] OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

--------------------------------------------------
1210-AB32-2-1433.html[7/26/2015 5:04:45 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwc-m3v9

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1929

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Donna Hoover

General Comment

I can plan my own reirement. Thank you but you can keep your hands off our hard work!
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOn spurious steady-state solutions of explicit Runge-Kutta schemesThe bifurcation diagram associated with the logistic equation v sup n+1 = av sup n (1-v sup n) is by now well known, as is its equivalence to solving the ordinary differential equation u prime = alpha u (1-u) by the explicit Euler difference scheme. It has also been noted by Iserles that other popular difference schemes may not only exhibit period doubling and chaotic phenomena but also possess spurious fixed points. Runge-Kutta schemes applied to both the equation u prime = alpha u (1-u) and the cubic equation u prime = alpha u (1-u)(b-u) were studied computationally and analytically and their behavior was contrasted with the explicit Euler scheme. Their spurious fixed points and periodic orbits were noted. In particular, it was observed that these may appear below the linearized stability limits of the scheme and, consequently, computation may lead to erroneous results.Document ID19900013024Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsSweby, P. K.*(Reading Univ. (England). Moffett Field, CA., United States)*Yee, H. C.*(NASA Ames Research Center)*Griffiths, D. F.*(Dundee Univ.)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1990Subject CategoryNumerical AnalysisReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:102819A-90148NASA-TM-102819Meeting InformationMeeting: International Conference on Hyperbolic ProblemsLocation: UppsalaCountry: SwedenStart Date: June 11, 1990End Date: June 15, 1990Accession Number90N22340Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-60-00Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900013024.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
From: M G LaMar [mailto:mglamarmd@gmail.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 10:31 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

To Whom It May Concern, 

 

I am writing to express my concern over an article I received about a proposed 

Government seizure of all retirement funds. 

 

I am opposed. I have been contributing to these funds for many years in hopes that they 

would be there when my best guess is that Social Security won't be; thanks to the 

Governments mismanagement of that program. 

 

Further, I do not believe anyone else but me or my heirs are entitled to the fruits of my 

life's work. I can give it away if I so choose, but no one has the right to take it away. 

 

If the Government is broke, do what all the rest of us do and reduce your consumption. 

Shrink your work force and budget. Stop printing money and trying to figure what assets 

you can seize to cover the bonds when China won't buy any more. 

 

Now get back to the job you were sent there to do in a responsible manner. Fail and we'll 

replace you in the next election cycle regarless of your party. 

 

M. G. LaMar, MD
Exhibit 10.1



                                  iParty Corp.


        COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS WITH INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS FOR SERVICE
         COMMENCING AFTER ELECTION AT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

                                  JUNE 8, 2005


Equity Compensation

         Each independent director (i.e., each of Daniel DeWolf, Frank Haydu,
Eric Schindler, and Joseph Vassalluzzo) shall be granted an option as of June 8,
2005 exercisable for the purchase of 40,000 of iParty's common stock in respect
of his service as a director, plus an additional 20,000 shares for serving on
one committee of iParty's board of directors, and 10,000 additional shares for
service on each additional board committee. Each such option shall have an
exercise price equal to the market price of iParty's common stock at the close
of business on the grant date, and shall vest in full on December 10, 2005.

         Accordingly, each of Messrs. DeWolf, Haydu, and Schindler shall be
granted an option exercisable for 80,000 shares (in respect of their service as
directors and, in each case, their service on the audit, compensation, and
nominating committees). Mr. Vassalluzzo shall be granted an option exercisable
for 70,000 shares (in respect of his service as a director and his service on
the nominating and real estate committees).

         Each of these stock option grants shall be made pursuant to iParty's
Amended and Restated 1998 Incentive and Non-qualified Stock Option Plan.


Cash Compensation

         Mr. Haydu shall be paid $10,000 in cash for serving as chairman of the
audit committee.
Wnited States Senate

WASHINGTON, DC 20510
September 23, 2015

The Honorable Thomas Perez
U.S. Department of Labor
200 Constitution Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20210

Dear Secretary Perez:

We were disappointed to hear that the Department of Labor has apparently
declined to withdraw or re-propose its proposed new definition of a fiduciary rule.

As you are no doubt aware, under the Administrative Procedure Act, any decision
on whether to re-propose must be made based on the record and public input.
However, we understand that in an August 7th letter — prior to public hearings and
the second comment period and thus before the record reflected material amounts
of public input — you announced your decision not to re-propose. Furthermore, we
understand DOL officials have also announced that the next version of the rule will
be “materially” different. This set of facts is not only inconsistent with the
Administrative Procedure Act, it is also troubling from two angles.

First, according to the practitioners in the retirement field, the rule is so rife with
unintended consequences that significant material changes are necessary if the rule
has any chance of being fixed. Secondly, as we trust that you intend to fulfill your
many promises to have an “open process” aimed at “getting it right”, you will no
doubt be made aware of these many shortcomings the public has identified and the
need for material changes to the rule.

These facts lead to the dilemma before your Department. If you haven’t made
material changes, then the public’s viewpoint will not have been fully considered
and we will get a flawed rule. However, if you have in fact made material
changes, those changes could well be significant enough to trigger a need to re-
propose under the Administrative Procedure Act in order to give the public the
ability to comment on a materially different set of rules. Yet you appear to have
pre-judged the issue of whether to re-propose.

We understand and share your interest in protecting workers, but we hope you
listen and respond to groups such as the National Black Chamber of Commerce


who have explained with great wisdom how this rule will lead to lost access to
retirement planning help for middle- and lower-income families. The DOL’s
proposed regulations risk hurting the very small businesses and workers they are
intended to protect. We urge you to change course in a manner that adheres to the
Administrative Procedure Act.

Thank you for listening and considering these recommendations which are made in
the spirit of helping you fulfil your promise to have an open process.

Sincerely,

Richard Burr Tom Tillis
U.S. Senator U.S. Senator
#### § 591.1 Scope.

This part establishes procedures governing the importation of motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment subject to the Federal motor vehicle safety, bumper, and theft prevention standards.

[55 FR 11378, Mar. 28, 1990]
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of eAutoclaims, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 14, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Larry
Colton, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of eAutoclaims, Inc.


   /s/ Larry Colton
---------------------------------
Print Name:  Larry Colton
Title:  Chief Financial Officer
June 14, 2006