alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 406 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 11, 2002.
Whereas the well-being of all people of the United States is preserved and 
        enhanced as a direct result of the vigilance and dedication of law 
        enforcement personnel;
Whereas more than 700,000 law enforcement personnel, at great risk to their 
        personal safety, serve their fellow citizens as guardians of peace;
Whereas peace officers are on the front line in preserving the right of the 
        children of the United States to receive an education in a crime-free 
        environment, a right that is all too often threatened by the insidious 
        fear caused by violence in schools;
Whereas 70 peace officers died at the World Trade Center in New York City on 
        September 11, 2001, the most peace officers ever killed in a single 
        incident in the history of the Nation;
Whereas more than 220 peace officers across the Nation were killed in the line 
        of duty during 2001, which represents 57 percent more police fatalities 
        than the previous year and makes 2001 the deadliest year for the law 
        enforcement community since 1974;
Whereas every year, 1 out of every 9 peace officers is assaulted, 1 out of every 
        25 peace officers is injured, and 1 out of every 4,400 peace officers is 
        killed in the line of duty;
Whereas section 136 of title 36, United States Code, requests that the President 
        issue each year a proclamation designating May 15 as Peace Officers 
        Memorial Day in honor of Federal, State, and local officers killed or 
        disabled in the line of duty; and
Whereas on May 15, 2002, more than 15,000 peace officers are expected to gather 
        in Washington, D.C. to join with the families of their recently fallen 
        comrades to honor those comrades and all others who went before them: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House--
            (1) honors Federal, State, and local peace officers killed 
        or disabled in the line of duty;
            (2) supports the goals and ideals of Peace Officers 
        Memorial Day; and
            (3) calls upon the people of the United States to observe 
        such a day with appropriate ceremonies and respect.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# Jordan, U.S. celebrate training cycle completion

/ Published Oct. 15, 2019
JORDAN, 

                New Jersey National Guard Soldiers, with 1st Squadron, 102nd Calvary Regiment, 44th Infantry Brigade Combat Team of the 42nd Infantry Division, watch as Jordan Border Guard Force Soldiers, with the 7th Mechanized Battalion, 48th Mechanized Brigade, fire live ammunition at a range during a Jordan Operational Engagement Program (JOEP) training cycle at Joint Training Center-Jordan in September 2019. Jordan and the United States have a strong and enduring partnership in regard to joint training and the JOEP further cements that partnership through persistent training with the Border Guard Forces, Quick Reaction Forces and the 77th Marine Battalion. (U.S. Army photo by Maj. David Zuzak)            

                Jordan, U.S. celebrate training cycle completion            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Maj. David Zuzak

VIRIN: 191003-A-PA428-776
H. Res. 446

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 19, 2002.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 3389) to reauthorize the National Sea Grant

College Program Act, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall

be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour, with

40 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman

and ranking minority member of the Committee on Resources

and 20 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on

Science. After general debate the bill shall be considered for

amendment under the five-minute rule. In lieu of the amendments recommended by the Committee on Resources and the

Committee on Science now printed in the bill, it shall be in

order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature
2

•HRES 446 EH

of a substitute printed in the report of the Committee on

Rules accompanying this resolution. Each section of that

amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered

as read. All points of order against that amendment in the

nature of a substitute are waived. During consideration of the

bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the

Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of

whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to

be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose of clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such

amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may

demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment

adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the

amendment in the nature of a substitute made in order as

original text. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit

with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
1210-AB32-2-1280.html[7/24/2015 10:07:04 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvu-igof

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1775

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Richard Bauch

General Comment

The Lord Jesus Christ, my Saviour has delivered me from my sins, whom has given me the ability to work and

 the Godly wisdom to set aside resources for my families retirement. Therefore; the Lord has blest me with the

 gift of investing in financial vehicles through an IRA, 410k or other financial tools, and the Lord Jesus has

 entrusted me with the responsibility of caring for my family's financial well being now and into retirement.

 Henceforth; not any government department or agency shall interfere in controlling my retirement means or

 anybody's retirement plan, because it is my money and I know best how to manage it. Just look at how any

 government body, department or agency manages my taxes that I pay along with other hard working tax payers,

 the people in these government positions are completely inept and irresponsible in the financial well being of

 this nation by the enormous national debt and out control spending and the uncertainty of my social security that

 I pay in every pay check!!! Keep your irresponsible hands off of my IRA, my 401k and my other retirement

 resources, because you are not trusted!!! 

This is America, Home of the Brave and the Land of the Free, let the American people freely manage their

 retirement without government interference and control.

Thank you. 

Sincerely Trusting in Jesus,

Richard Bauch
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of RegeneRx (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J.J. Finkelstein, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                |  |                                      
|--------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|August 16, 2004 |  | /s/ J.J. Finkelstein                 
|                |  | Chief Executive and Financial Officer
From: E G Hunter [mailto:eg_hunter@bellsouth.net] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 2:30 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 

LEAVE MY PRIVATE 

RETIREMENT ALONE! I 

WORKED FOR IT, I 

SAVED I. IT IS MINE!!

 

I AM WILLING TO GO TO 

WAR OVER THIS!!!!!!!
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: F AA - 2013 - 0422 Directorate Identifier: 2012NM097AD

AOT A27L001 - 12 --- 4/26/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket


### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221
**DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
Exhibit
10.6





FIRST
AMENDMENT


TO
THE


PNM
RESOURCES, INC.


EXECUTIVE
SAVINGS PLAN




The
Public Service Company of New Mexico Executive Savings Plan (the “Plan”)was originally effective
as of July 1, 1998.  PNM Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) became the
parent holding company for Public Service Company of New Mexico as of December
31, 2001.  Effective as of November 27, 2002, the Company assumed the
sponsorship of the Plan and renamed it the “PNM Resources, Inc. Executive
Savings Plan.”  The Plan was most recently amended and restated in its
entirety, effective as of January 1, 2004.  By this instrument,
the Company now desires to amend the Plan to transfer the liability for any
amounts due under the Plan to the PNM Resources, Inc. Executive Savings Plan
II.  This amendment constitutes a material modification of the Plan
pursuant to Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-6(a)(1)(i), which will subject the Plan to
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) effective as of the date
of execution of this First Amendment.




1.           This First
Amendment shall be effective as of the date on which it is
executed.




2.           Article VII
(Amendment or
Termination) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding a new Section 7.3 to
the end thereof:




7.3           Combination
of Plan with PNM Resources, Inc. Executive Savings Plan
II.  The Plan is hereby combined with the PNM Resources, Inc.
Executive Savings Plan II (the “ESP II”) effective as of the date this First
Amendment is executed (the “Combination Effective Date”), with the ESP II being
the surviving plan.  The Plan Administrator is authorized and directed
to take all actions necessary or







appropriate
to transfer the liabilities of the Plan to the ESP II as of the Combination
Effective Date.  Following the transfer of liabilities, Participants
will no longer have any claim for benefits under the Plan, and the ESP II shall
be deemed to have accepted the liability to each Participant for liabilities so
transferred, as such amounts may increase or decrease after the date of the
transfer.




3.           As of the
Combination Effective Date, the Plan shall be completely amended and restated in
the form of the ESP II document and the ESP II will be considered an amendment
and restatement of the Plan and shall govern the rights of the Participants
under the Plan.




IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, PNM Resources has caused this First Amendment to be executed as
of this 17th day
of December, 2008.




PNM
RESOURCES, INC.






By: /s/ Alice A.
Cobb


Its:  SVP, Chief Administrative
Officer





2
# Allegation of civilian casualties in West Mosul

/ Published March 25, 2017
20170325-02**SOUTHWEST ASIA —**
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS,  CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS,  AND THE NOTES THERETO,  WHICH MAY BE FOUND ON PAGES 2
THROUGH 6 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30, 1997,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         24,831
<SECURITIES>                                   83,165
<RECEIVABLES>                                  93
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               108,089
<PP&E>                                         34,701
<DEPRECIATION>                                 13,321
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,469
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          65,529
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    50,000
<COMMON>                                       3,138,102
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,124,162)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   129,469
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               72,508
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               184,286
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (111,778)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (111,778)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (111,778)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.21)
        


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 24-0208

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

THERESA MARIE WALKER,

Defendant and Appellant

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until July 15, 2024, to prepare, 

file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

June 4 2024

06/04/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0208
----

(2004/C 88 E/0481)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3550/03

by José Ribeiro e Castro (UEN) to the Commission

(28 November 2003)

Subject:   Zimbabwe — Censorship and repression

In the last few weeks, the ZANU-PF Government of President Mugabe closed down Zimbabwe's only independent daily newspaper — The Daily News — and stepped up repression of political opponents and dissidents. The newspaper's lawyers went to the local Administrative Court seeking the revocation of the decision to close the paper, which they were granted by the ruling of 24 October, in which it was acknowledged that the government's Committee for the Media and Information had no legitimate right to stop the publication of the newspaper.

After a single edition appeared, the police closed the paper again, on the basis of a government appeal to the Supreme Court, which suspended the effects of the previous ruling. Zimbabwe's Supreme Court, currently presided over by Judge Godfrey Chidyausiku, a former Mugabe minister, may take years to consider this appeal.

Given the climate of violence and intimidation, the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) opposition party has apparently already reorganised itself in such a way as to enable it to operate clandestinely.

John Makumbe, professor of political science at Harare's University of Zimbabwe, claims that the next target will be NGOs, given that the Zimbabwean Parliament is drafting legislation demanding that such organisations be registered, and providing for possible suspension of their senior personnel.

The Commission:

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(9 January 2004)

The Commission is aware of the facts mentioned by the Honourable Member and follows events in Zimbabwe with concern and very closely. The Union has reacted promptly to the latest attacks against fundamental rights made by the Government of Zimbabwe.

Being deeply worried about the deterioration of the current situation with regard to the above, the Commission has fully supported the last two Declarations issued by the Presidency on behalf of the Union related to these matters: on 18 September 2003, a declaration on Freedom of Press in Zimbabwe by which the Union has condemned the closure of the Daily News and, recently, on 28 November 2003, a declaration expressing concern on the current situation in Zimbabwe, calling on the Government of Zimbabwe to respect fundamental rights and urging it to engage in active and meaningful dialogue with internal stakeholders as a way forward to solve the current crisis.

The Commission cannot confirm the information as referred to by the Honourable Member on the imminent promulgation of laws infringing the freedom and independence of the press and the nongovernmental organisations (NGO's) operating in Zimbabwe.

The Commission intends to pursue its assistance to civil society actors in order to support human rights and democratisation projects/activities and to allow them to enhance their capacity to promote internal dialogue.

----
SUPREME COURT.

#### Sarah Lyons agt. Magdalena Murat. The Same agt. Albert J. Murat.

*When proceedings a/re stayed for rum-payment of costs*ordered— *Construction of section*779 *of the new Code of Civil Procedure—practice as to unverified pleadings.*

A pleading, verified by an attorney, stating as the ground for his verification, instead of the verification of the party herself, “ that he could not find her in the city, and it was his last day to reply,” does not conform in its verification to section 525. It states no legal reason why it'is not made by the party, and may, by section 528, be treated as a nullity.

Where costs have been ordered against a party on a former motion, the non-payment of these costs, *ipso*facto, stays all proceedings of such party until the payment of the same *[Code of Civil Procedure, sec.*779).

*Special*Term, October, 1877.

The plaintiff served alleged replies to new matter set up in the answers of the defendants, which were verified by her attorney, upon the ground that he could not find her in the city, and it was his last day to reply. . The complaints and the answers were properly verified by the parties in the usual form. The defendants returned the alleged replies within twenty-four hours, with the following reason thereon indorsed :

'“The within alleged reply, which was served Saturday, October 20, 1877, at 2.35 p. m., is hereby returned this day as an unverified pleading. It does not conform in its verification to section 525 of the Uew York Code of Civil Procedure, and states no legal reason why it is not made by the *24party. The defendant elects, pursuant to section 528 of the New York Code of Civil Procedure, to treat the same as a nullity.

“ Dated, N. Y., Oct. 22, 1877, at 9 a. m.”

The plaintiff then moved to compel defendants to accept service of the replies.

*Ferdinand S.*Hahn, for plaintiff,

in support of the motion, argued that, not knowing the whereabouts of his client during the day-time, and the facts of the case being within his own knowledge, the verification was sufficient, and the court could compel defendants to accept service of the replies.

*Messrs. George F. and J. C. Julius Langbein,*for defendants,

in opposition, argued that the only question before the court was as to which party was regular in his proceedings. No *legal*reason was given why the plaintiff did not herself verify the replies; that thirty dollars costs had been ordered against her on former motions, which were not paid, and cited section 779 of the new Code, and the case of *Thaule*agt. *Frost (reported in 1 Abbott’s New Cases,*298), and claimed that non-payment of these costs, *ipso*facto, stays all proceedings of the plaintiff. They also referred to a note made by Montgomery H. Throop, one of the commissioners of the new Code, to section 779.

Donohue, *J.,*

held the objection fatal, and denied the motions, with ten dollars costs in each case.
#### § 802.2 Definitions.

In this part:

*Board* means the five Members of the National Transportation Safety Board, or a quorum thereof;

*Individual* means a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence;

*National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)* means the agency set up under the Independent Safety Board Act of 1974;

*Record* means any item, collection, or grouping of information about an individual that is maintained under the control of the NTSB pursuant to Federal law or in connection with the transaction of public business, including, but not limited to, education, financial transactions, medical history, and criminal or employment history, and that contains a name, or an identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to an individual, such as a finger or voice imprint or photograph;

*Routine use* means the use of such record for a purpose compatible with the purpose for which it was collected, including, but not limited to, referral to law enforcement agencies of violations of the law and for discovery purposes ordered by a court referral to potential employers, and for security clearance;

*Statistical record* means a record in a system of records maintained for statistical research or reporting purposes only and which is not used wholly or partially in any determination concerning an identifiable individual;

*System Manager* means the agency official who is responsible for the policies and practices of his particular system or systems of record, as specified in the NTSB notices of systems or records; and

*System of records* means a group of any records under the control of the NTSB from which information is retrieved by the name of an individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual, whether presently in existence or set up in the future.