alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 511.61 Purpose.

This subpart establishes the procedures and requirements necessary to obtain a settlement of a case of violation of section 507 (1) or (2) of the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act, as amended, Pub. L. 94-163, 89 Stat. 911 (15 U.S.C. section 2007(1)(2)). No settlement of such cases may be had except as in accordance with this subpart.
From: Stakelbeck, Ron [mailto:ron.stakelbeck@roche.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 10:43 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

Keep your Marxist hands off my money you worthless pieces of excrement.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Heritage Worldwide,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: May 20, 2008             /s/ Jean Claude Mas
                               -------------------
                               Jean Claude Mas
                               Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
                               (Principal Executive Officer)
FRANK CUMMINGS

800 25TH STREET, NW, # 404

WASHINGTON, DC 20037 _________

(202) 288-4959 fcummingsdc@aol.com

www.fcummingsdc.com

February 4, 2010

Office of Regulations and Interpretations

Employee Benefits Security Administration

U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue NW (Room N-5655)

Washington, DC 20210

 Attn: Lifetime Income RFI

EMAILED: e-ORI@dol.gov

RE: RIN 1210-AB33

(Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options 

for Participants and Beneficiaries in Retirement Plans) 

Dear Sir or Madam:

 Qualified retirement plans cannot provide adequate lifetime income, by 

annuity or otherwise, if the value of accruals is “cashed out” and not “rolled over” 

before retirement. 

 The great weakness in the current system, which is mainly a defined 

contribution plan (“DCP”) system, is that the neediest retirees are the ones most 

likely to have taken cashouts whenever they change employers. Thus, the great 

irony in the current system is that, upon a change of employers, those who have the 

least need, because they have ample other resources, will do a plan-to-plan (or 

plan-to-IRA) rollover, saving the sheltered accumulation for retirement, even 

though they may not need it. But those with the greatest need for retirement 

security -- those who do not have ample other resources -- will take the cashout, 
pay the tax penalty, and then use the remainder to pay off accumulated credit card 

debts, student loans, and other obligations. 

 Thus, the current system actually discriminates against “low-comps” and in 

favor of “high-comps” if you compare these two groups and if you measure 

the discrimination correctly.

 PROPOSAL: To correct this defect in the current system, the antidiscrimination regulations under Internal Revenue Code § 401(a)(4) should be 

amended to provide that a plan shall not constitute a qualified trust under this 

section if the highly compensated employees retain a higher percentage of their 

accrued benefits, compard with the non-highly compensated employees, after 

subtracting the value of account values distributed upon termination of 

employment and not rolled over to another qualified plan or IRA.

 Respectfully submitted,

 Frank Cummings

-2-
H. Res. 224

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 1, 2001.

Whereas more than 700,000 men and women across the Nation serve their fellow citizens in their capacity as guardians of peace;

Whereas the law enforcement officers of New Jersey are recognized for their dedication to promote, advance, and encourage cooperation among all law enforcement officers;

Whereas law enforcement officers serve at great risk to their

personal safety;

Whereas the citizens of New Jersey are indebted to their law

enforcement officers, who are willing to die to protect

them and their families and to risk all of their hopes and

all of their dreams to ensure the safety and well-being of

New Jersey communities;

Whereas law enforcement officers of New Jersey have fallen

in the line of duty, and the thoughts and prayers of the

House of Representatives and the country remain with

the families of these men and women;

Whereas the men and women in New Jersey’s law enforcement community are on the front line in our schools and

on our streets, preserving the right of our children to

learn in schools that are free of violence and the right of

our citizens to safe communities; and
2

•HRES 224 EH

Whereas the members of the New Jersey State Law Enforcement Officers Association are an integral part of our society, in whom we have instilled public trust: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes

the bravery and honor of the law enforcement officers of New

Jersey, and the service of those officers to their communities.

Attest:

Clerk.
Editorial Note on Part 385
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 385.19 Safety fitness information. ( a ) Final ratings will be made available to other Federal and State agencies in writing, telephonically or by remote computer access.
( b ) The final safety rating assigned to a motor carrier will be made available to the public upon request. Any person requesting the assigned rating of a motor carrier shall provide the FMCSA with the motor carrier's name, principal office address, and, if known, the USDOT number or the docket number, if any.
( c ) Requests should be addressed to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Office of Registration and Safety Information (MC-RS), 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001. The information also can be found on the FMCSA Safety and Fitness Electronic Records System website at *https://safer.fmcsa.dot.gov .*
( d ) Oral requests by telephone to (800) 832-5660 will be given an oral response.
[62 FR 60043, Nov. 6, 1997, as amended at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001; 72 FR 55701, Oct. 1, 2007; 75 FR 17241, Apr. 5, 2010; 77 FR 28450, May 14, 2012; 77 FR 59826, Oct. 1, 2012; 84 FR 51433, Sept. 30, 2019]
**Exhibit 3.6**

**AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS**

**OF**

**COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION**

Adopted January 12, 2007 

Section 3.02 of the Corporation’s Bylaws is amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

“General Powers and Number. The business and affairs of the Corporation shall be managed by the Board subject to any limitations set forthunder the laws of the State of Delaware, the Articles of Incorporation, and these Bylaws concerning corporate action that must be authorized or approved by the stockholders. The number of directors of the Corporation shall be seven. The authorizednumber of directors can be changed from time to time only by a duly authorized amendment of this Section 3.02. No reduction of the number of directors shall have the effect of removing any director before that director’s term of officeexpires.” 

 

77
§ 38.21 General. ( a ) New, used or remanufactured buses and vans (except over-the-road buses covered by subpart G of this part), to be considered accessible by regulations in part 37 of this title shall comply with the applicable provisions of this subpart.
( b ) If portions of the vehicle are modified in a way that affects or could affect accessibility, each such portion shall comply, to the extent practicable, with the applicable provisions of this subpart. This provision does not require that inaccessible buses be retrofitted with lifts, ramps or other boarding devices.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |                                                                                                            |                                    |
|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                          |                                                                                                       |                               |
| Date:                March 7, 2006 | By:                                                                                                   | /s/ Phillip                W. Ware |
|                               | Phillip                W. Ware                                                                                  |
|                               | Chief                Executive Officer, President                and Principal Financial                Officer |

----
§ 234.267 Insulation resistance tests, wires in trunking and cables. ( a ) Insulation resistance tests shall be made when wires or cables are installed and at least once every ten years thereafter.
( b ) Insulation resistance tests shall be made between all conductors and ground, between conductors in each multiple conductor cable, and between conductors in trunking. Insulation resistance tests shall be performed when wires, cables, and insulation are dry.
( c ) Subject to paragraph (d) of this section, when insulation resistance of wire or cable is found to be less than 500,000 ohms, prompt action shall be taken to repair or replace the defective wire or cable. Until such defective wire or cable is replaced, insulation resistance tests shall be made annually.
( d ) A circuit with a conductor having an insulation resistance of less than 200,000 ohms shall not be used.
( e ) Required insulation resistance testing that does not conform to the required testing schedule of this section shall be completed in accordance with the following schedule: ( 1 ) Not less than 50% by the end of calendar year 1996;
( 2 ) Not less than a total of 75% by the end of calendar year 1997; and
( 3 ) One hundred percent by the end of calendar year 1998.
From: Kathleen Curran [mailto:kcurran106@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 6:51 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

We are currently receiving financial advice from a fee-only advisor and we appreciate very 

much that she is is required to act in our best interest.

We write you in support of that ruling being required of all financial advisories, not just those 

who are fee-only. Investments being "just suitable" rather than the best for the investor is 

clearly just wrong advice and we believe that rule needs to be changed .

Thank you.

Tim and Kathy Curran

8519 West 88th Terrace

Overland Park, KS 66212
-----Original Message-----

From: Dennis Chester [mailto:dennischester@att.net] 

Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 2:38 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Proposed rule to ban options in self directed retirement account

To Whom it May Concern:

The proposed rule to ban options in self directed retirement accounts is short sighted and not in the 

best interest of the public.

I have worked over thirty years placing money in retirement. I do not use outside advice, do my own 

research and self direct my retirement account. Retirement accounts today yield virtually nothing in 

savings. Thus the retiree has to deplete their hard earned money for retirement and eventually 

become a burden on society

Stocks have been one of the few areas where a retiree can invest successfully over time. However 

stocks are volatile. Option strategies including puts and covered calls act as insurance policies and limit 

losses. 

Now the government in it's wisdom wants to prevent my use of these tools for my livelihood in my 

senior years. I assume this is to protect me and my family from myself. Thus the government in it's 

wisdom can continue the policies that caused the 2007 recession, destroyed the middle class and have 

made this country 3rd world.

The proposed rule is nearsighted and not in the best interest of this country. 

Sincerely,

Dennis Chester
§ 585.116 Reporting requirements. ( a ) *General reporting requirements.* Within 60 days after the end of the production years ending August 31, 2013, August 31, 2014, and August 31, 2015, each manufacturer must submit a report to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration concerning its compliance with Standard No. 216a (49 CFR 571.216a) for its passenger cars, multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks, and buses with a gross vehicle weight rating of less than 2,722 kilograms (6,000 pounds) produced in that year. Each report must — ( 1 ) Identify the manufacturer;
( 2 ) State the full name, title, and address of the official responsible for preparing the report;
( 3 ) Identify the production year being reported on;
( 4 ) Contain a statement regarding whether or not the manufacturer complied with the requirements of Standard No. 216a (49 CFR 571.216a) for the period covered by the report and the basis for that statement;
( 5 ) Provide the information specified in paragraph (b) of this section;
( 6 ) Be written in the English language; and
( 7 ) Be submitted to: Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
( b ) *Report content* — ( 1 ) *Basis for statement of compliance.* Each manufacturer must provide the number of passenger cars, multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks, and buses with a gross vehicle weight rating of 2,722 kilograms (6,000 pounds) or less, manufactured for sale in the United States for each of the three previous production years, or, at the manufacturer's option, for the current production year. A new manufacturer that has not previously manufactured these vehicles for sale in the United States must report the number of such vehicles manufactured during the current production year.
( 2 ) *Production.* Each manufacturer must report for the production year for which the report is filed: the number of passenger cars, multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks, and buses with a gross vehicle weight rating of 2,722 kilograms (6,000 pounds) or less that meet Standard No. 216a (49 CFR 571.216a).
( 3 ) *Statement regarding compliance.* Each manufacturer must provide a statement regarding whether or not the manufacturer complied with the requirements of Standard No. 216a (49 CFR 571.216a) as applicable to the period covered by the report, and the basis for that statement. This statement must include an explanation concerning the use of any carry-forward credits.
( 4 ) *Vehicles produced by more than one manufacturer.* Each manufacturer whose reporting of information is affected by one or more of the express written contracts permitted by S8.6.2 of Standard No. 216a (49 CFR 571.216a) must: ( i ) Report the existence of each contract, including the names of all parties to the contract, and explain how the contract affects the report being submitted.
( ii ) Report the actual number of vehicles covered by each contract.
Editorial Note on Part 572
Editorial Notes: 1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 572.6 Head. ( a ) The head consists of the assembly shown as number SA 150 M010 in Figure 1 and conforms to each of the drawings subtended by number SA 150 M010.
( b ) When the head is dropped from a height of 10 inches in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section, the peak resultant accelerations at the location of the accelerometers mounted in the head form in accordance with § 572.11(b) shall be not less than 210g, and not more than 260g. The acceleration/time curve for the test shall be unimodal and shall lie at or above the 100g level for an interval not less than 0.9 milliseconds and not more than 1.5 milliseconds. The lateral acceleration vector shall not exceed 10g.
( c ) Test procedure: ( 1 ) Suspend the head as shown in Figure 2, so that the lowest point on the forehead is 0.5 inches below the lowest point on the dummy's nose when the midsagittal plane is vertical.
( 2 ) Drop the head from the specified height by means that ensures instant release onto a rigidly supported flat horizontal steel plate, 2 inches thick and 2 feet square, which has a clean, dry surface and any microfinish of not less than 8 microinches (rms) and not more than 80 microinches (rms).
( 3 ) Allow a time period of at least 2 hours between successive tests on the same head.
[38 FR 20451, Aug. 1, 1973, as amended at 42 FR 7152, Feb. 7, 1977]
1210-AB32-2-1243.html[7/24/2015 9:24:59 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvt-m3yr

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1738

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I don't NEED or WANT the government to have anything to do with MY retirement plans.!! They have already

 demonstrated

 their competence-----I.E. OBAMACARE!!

Enough said...
#### § 605.13 Tripper service.

The prohibition against the use of buses, facilities and equipment funded under the Acts shall not apply to tripper service.
**Monroe**

total population 21757 population in NAA 163 fraction 0.00749

VOC NOx SO2 PM-10 PM-2.5 NH3 VOC NOx SO2 EGU Point 356.2427548.6786349.70 602.31 260.53 0.00 2.67 206.39 646.92 Non-EGU Point 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area 733.38 44.23 47.302910.59 398.52671.64 5.49 0.33 0.35 Fire 167.27 72.93 17.51 327.42 286.23 13.39 1.25 0.55 0.13 Non-road 252.80 458.50 33.70 22.80 21.20 0.10 1.89 3.44 0.25 On-road 2221.80 3205.90 113.50 69.70 52.00 79.40 16.65 24.02 0.85

**Putnam** total population 18812 population in NAA 3088 fraction 0.16415

VOC NOx SO2 PM-10 PM-2.5 NH3 VOC NOx SO2 EGU Point 125.6527894.9373943.102185.05 945.63 0.00 20.634578.9712137.80 Non-EGU Point 259.25 56.21 6.03 16.84 16.62 0.00 42.56 9.23 0.99 Area 535.45 106.48 208.362289.78 340.37323.42 87.89 17.48 34.20 Fire 189.09 83.82 22.98 385.98 331.91 17.57 31.04 13.76 3.77 Non-road 465.20 179.60 15.90 18.10 17.20 0.20 76.36 29.48 2.61 On-road 971.20 1045.30 43.30 26.60 19.80 30.30159.42 171.59 7.11

Notes: Emissions data are from VISTAS 2002 actural. Populations are from CENSUS 2000.Total emissions (tons/year)

Total emissions (tons/year) Emissions in NAA (tons/year)

Emissions in NAA (tons/year)PM-10PM-2.5 NH3

4.51 1.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.81 2.99 5.03 2.45 2.14 0.10 0.17 0.16 0.00 0.52 0.39 0.59

PM-10PM-2.5 NH3 358.68 155.23 0.00 2.76 2.73 0.00 375.87 55.8753.09 63.36 54.48 2.88 2.97 2.82 0.03 4.37 3.25 4.97 Emissions in NAA (tons/year)

Emissions in NAA (tons/year)
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFinite element elastic-plastic-creep and cyclic life analysis of a cowl lipResults are presented of elastic, elastic-plastic, and elastic-plastic-creep analyses of a test-rig component of an actively cooled cowl lip. A cowl lip is part of the leading edge of an engine inlet of proposed hypersonic aircraft and is subject to severe thermal loadings and gradients during flight. Values of stresses calculated by elastic analysis are well above the yield strength of the cowl lip material. Such values are highly unrealistic, and thus elastic stress analyses are inappropriate. The inelastic (elastic-plastic and elastic-plastic-creep) analyses produce more reasonable and acceptable stress and strain distributions in the component. Finally, using the results from these analyses, predictions are made for the cyclic crack initiation life of a cowl lip. A comparison of predicted cyclic lives shows the cyclic life prediction from the elastic-plastic-creep analysis to be the lowest and, hence, most realistic.Document ID19900013492Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypePreprint (Draft being sent to journal)AuthorsArya, Vinod K.*(Toledo Univ. OH., United States)*Melis, Matthew E.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Halford, Gary R.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 8, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1990Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:102342NASA-TM-102342E-5050Accession Number90N22808Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 553-13-00Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900013492.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
1210-AB32-2-1556.html[7/26/2015 7:33:56 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 11, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jx6-j020

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2053

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Phil Anderson

General Comment

I do not want nor do I seek government assistance, government oversight or government restrictions on how I

 administer and access my retirement funds. I am in a better position to determine what is most prudent for my

 retirement than a government bureaucrat. Therefore, I am opposed to EBSA and DOL plans to implement

 further restrictions and controls over my retirement money.