alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11
                                                                    ----------

                                           STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF
                                                 PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Years Ended June 30,
                                                                     -------------------

                                                      1997                    1996                1995
                                                      ----                    ----                ----    

<S>                                                 <C>                      <C>                 <C>
Average shares outstanding                          6,006,449                5,756,344           5,735,892

Dilutive effect of stock
options computed by use
of treasury stock method                              181,515                  179,178             166,527
                                                  -----------              -----------          ----------  

Average common and common
equivalent shares
outstanding                                         6,187,964                5,935,522            5,902,419
                                                  ===========              ===========          ===========   

Computation of Earnings
Per Share = Net Income
divided by Average common and
common equivalent shares                         $  11,156,400           $   9,769,200         $  8,050,900
outstanding                                          6,187,964               5,935,522            5,902,419
                                                  ------------             -----------          -----------
                                                              


Earnings Per Share                               $        1.80           $        1.65         $       1.36
                                                  ============            ============          ===========

</TABLE>
United States Office of Water EPA 821-F-02-012

Environmental Protection 4303T June 2002 

Agency

Fact Sheet

Cooling Water Intake Structures At Large Existing Power

Plants- Extension of Comment Period

Summary

• In April 2002, EPA proposed to establish location, design, construction and capacity

standards for cooling water intake structures at existing power plants that use the largest

amounts of cooling water.

• The proposed regulation was published in the Federal Register on April 9, 2002, and

provided a 90-day public comment period (www.epa.gov/waterscience/316b/).

• In response to multiple requests for additional time to review and comment on the proposed

regulation and its record, EPA is extending the comment period by 30 days. Public

comments will now be accepted until August 7, 2002. 

Background

• Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act requires EPA to ensure that the location, design,

construction, and capacity of cooling water intake structures reflect the best technology

available for minimizing adverse environmental impact.

• EPA is developing these regulations under the terms of an Amended Consent Decree in

Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Whitman, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 93-

Civ.0314 (AGS). 

• The proposed regulation is designed to protect fish, shellfish, and other aquatic life from

being killed or injured by cooling water intake structures.

• EPA estimates that this rule would affect approximately 550 facilities and cost $182 million

per year. EPA estimates that the benefits of the rule would be as much as $700 million.

• The rule would not cause any electric generating facilities to close and would not adversely

effect energy supply, distribution, or use. 

Additional Information

You can call Tom Wall at (202) 566-1060 or Deborah Nagle at (202) 566-1063, or you can write

to either of them at:

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Science and Technology

Engineering and Analysis Division, Cooling Water Intake Task Force (4303T)

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, D.C. 20460 

You can also send an e-mail to Wall.Tom@epa.gov or Nagle.Deborah@epa.gov . For further

details about this Phase II proposal or any other phase of this rulemaking, refer to

www.epa.gov/waterscience/316b/ on the Internet.
§ 299.421 Emergency roof access. ( a ) *Number and dimensions.* Each passenger car shall have a minimum of two emergency roof access locations, each providing a minimum opening of 660 mm (26 inches) longitudinally (*i.e.,* parallel to the longitudinal axis of the car) by 610 mm (24 inches) laterally.
( b ) *Means of access.* Emergency roof access shall be provided by means of a conspicuously marked structural weak point in the roof for access by properly equipped emergency response personnel.
( c ) *Location.* Emergency roof access locations shall be situated so that when a car is on its side— ( 1 ) One emergency access location is situated as close as practicable within each half of the roof as divided top from bottom; and
( 2 ) One emergency access location is situated as close as practicable within each half of the roof as divided left from right. (*See* Figure 1 to this paragraph.)
( d ) *Obstructions.* The ceiling space below each emergency roof access location shall be free from wire, cabling, conduit, and piping. This space shall also be free of any rigid secondary structure (*e.g.,* a diffuser or diffuser support, lighting back fixture, mounted PA equipment, or luggage rack) where practicable. It shall be permissible to cut through interior panels, liners, or other non-rigid secondary structures after making the cutout hole in the roof, provided any such additional cutting necessary to access the interior of the vehicle permits a minimum opening of the dimensions specified in paragraph (a) of this section to be maintained.
( e ) *Marking instructions.* Each emergency roof access location shall be conspicuously marked with retroreflective material of contrasting color meeting the minimum requirements specified in § 299.423. Legible and understandable instructions shall be posted at or near each such location.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               1,659
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        5,166
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     7,212
<PP&E>                                             116,247
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     127,461
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               13,532
<BONDS>                                            100,898
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               167
<OTHER-SE>                                          11,123
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       127,461
<SALES>                                              4,505
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     4,538
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        3,402
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       596
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2,775
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (2,198)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (2,198)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (2,198)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.14)



</TABLE>
NO. 12-14-00132-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE: §

RICHARD JAMES JOHNSON, § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

RELATOR §

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Richard James Johnson seeks a writ of mandamus requiring the trial court to rule 

on his “motion to appeal.” We deny the petition.

Mandamus is available to correct a clear abuse of discretion when there is no adequate 

remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. 

proceeding). The relator has the burden of establishing both requirements for mandamus. In re 

E. Tex. Med. Ctr. Athens, 154 S.W.3d 933, 935 (Tex. App.–Tyler 2005, orig. proceeding). 

Thus, a party seeking mandamus relief must generally bring forward all that is necessary to 

establish the claim for relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52. 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52 prescribes the contents of a petition in an original 

proceeding such as this one. See generally TEX. R. APP. P. 52. As applied here, this rule requires 

that a mandamus petition include a complete list of the parties and the names and addresses of all 

counsel, a table of contents, an index of authorities, a statement of the case, and a statement of 

jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(a)-(e). Other requirements include a statement of the 

issues presented, a statement of facts, an appendix, a record, and a clear and concise argument 

for the contentions made with appropriate citations to authorities and to the appendix or record. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(f)-(h), (k), 52.7(a). Johnson’s petition does not meet any of these 

requirements. 
2

Compliance with some of Rule 52’s requirements, such as a clear and concise argument 

and a record, is necessary to provide this court with adequate information to evaluate the 

relator’s request for relief. However, Johnson has failed to comply with these requirements and 

others that ensure the availability of adequate information to this court. Therefore, we are unable 

to evaluate the merits of his petition. Accordingly, we deny Johnson’s petition for writ of 

mandamus.

Opinion delivered May 30, 2014.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

MAY 30, 2014

NO. 12-14-00132-CV

RICHARD JAMES JOHNSON,

Relator

v.

HON. MARK A. CALHOON,

Respondent

 

 

 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed 

by RICHARD JAMES JOHNSON, who is the defendant in Cause No. 3-42090, pending on 

the docket of the 3rd Judicial District Court of Anderson County, Texas. Said petition for writ of 

mandamus having been filed herein on May 22, 2014, and the same having been duly 

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that a writ of mandamus should not issue, it is 

therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of 

mandamus be, and the same is, hereby DENIED.

Brian Hoyle, Justice.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
----

(2004/C 88 E/0309)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3737/02

by Ilda Figueiredo (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(19 December 2002)

Subject:   ‘ABEJ — Solidarités’

‘ABEJ — Solidarités’, based in Lille (France), is an association which performs important work with street children. Its work, however, is now being put at risk thanks to a 55 % cut in the health budget for 2003.

Between 700 and 800 recipients of help at street level could be affected by this, with the consequent worsening of social exclusion.

Can the Commission explain the reasons for the reduction in support to associations of this kind, and state what measures it intends to take to prevent social exclusion from becoming worse?

Answer given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(30 January 2003)

The Commission has no information concerning the reduction of the aid granted to the French association ‘ABEJ — Solidarités’. The amount of this aid is determined solely by the French Government when adopting the national annual budget.

An analysis of the efforts made by the governments of the Member States to combat poverty and social exclusion is to be conducted by the Commission, in partnership with the Member States, when the second series of national action plans to combat poverty and social exclusion is presented in July 2003. The results of this analysis will be given in the second joint report on social inclusion, to be submitted to the European Council in spring 2004.

----
#### § 622.101 Cross-reference to procedures.

The procedures for complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.*), and related statutes, regulations, and Executive Orders are set forth in part 771 of title 23 of the CFR. The procedures for complying with 49 U.S.C. 303, commonly known as “Section 4(f),” are set forth in part 774 of title 23 of the CFR. The procedures for complying with the Surface Transportation Project Delivery Program application requirements and termination are set forth in part 773 of title 23 of the CFR. The procedures for participating and complying with the program for eliminating duplication of environmental reviews are set forth in part 778 of title 23 of the CFR.

[85 FR 84229, Dec. 28, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
BAY COMMERCIAL SERVICES SECOND QUARTER 1998 10QSB AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                         1,000
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                         JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                    13,431
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                           6,900
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>               19,544
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                    25,850
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                      26,009
<LOANS>                                   80,351
<ALLOWANCE>                                  900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           128,993
<DEPOSITS>                               116,080
<SHORT-TERM>                               1,317
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          897
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<COMMON>                                   3,616
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           128,993
<INTEREST-LOAN>                            3,971
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            679
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             193
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           4,843
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                         1,624
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         1,658
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                      3,185
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                 69
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                            2,778
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              858
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   858
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                 557
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.44
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                              5.91
<LOANS-NON>                                  231
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             469
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                            1000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                169
<RECOVERIES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            900
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         900
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                       90
        

</TABLE>
# SERVED OCTOBE R14 , 201 1 ;GPARTMENTO F U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATION'i0^r!?V?r&L^^^^ ^

OFFIC EO FHEARING S ' ''-" ^ '-"-"•^'"-''^= ^ WASHINGTON , D C 

# ?

moc mp I : LiL

i I n Th e Matte r

Of : BRUC E ALLAR D QUINB Y Respondent . FA A Docke t No . CP08SO000 5 FDM S No . FAA-2008-024 1

ORDE RDISMISSIN GPROCEEDIN G On Octobe r

13 , 201 1 th e Complainant , th e Federal Aviatio n Administratio n (FAA) , filed aWithdrawal o f Complain t

wit hth e Offic e o f

Hearings . Th e Withdrawal o f Complain t

state dthat

th e partie s ha

dreache dasettlement , an drequeste da

n orde r dismissin g th e proceedings . Pursuan t t o 1 4 C.F.R . §215 , thi s proceedin g i s dismisse dwit hprejudice .

IE . Sullivai rmistrativ e La

w Judg e Attachment : Servic e Lis tFDM S NO . FAA-2008-024 1 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L4

& ON E COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , ACiC^3 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1OOO '

ON E COP Y Bruc e Quinby , Responden t 19 7 Tanglewoo dLn . Kingston , T N 3776 3 TEL : 865-717-121 0 Geral dA . Ellis , Comj}lainan t '• > Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counsel , ASO- 7 Souther n Regio n P.O . Bo x 2063 6 Atlanta , G A 3032 0 TEL : • 404-305-520 0 FAX : 404-305-522 3 Th e Honorabl e J . E . Sullivan , Administrativ e La w Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service wa

s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r service i n perso n o r b y expeditedcourier, use th

e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration , 60

0 Independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk . AGC-430 .



### - 2 -
IV

House Calendar No. 110

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 315

[Report No. 107–336]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 1) to close the achievement gap with accountability, flexibility,

and choice, so that no child is left behind.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 13 (legislative day, DECEMBER 12), 2001

Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 1) to close the achievement

gap with accountability, flexibility, and choice, so that

no child is left behind.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 1) to close the achievement gap

4 with accountability, flexibility, and choice, so that no child

5 is left behind. All points of order against the conference
2

HRES 315 RH

1 report and against its consideration are waived. The con2 ference report shall be considered as read.

House Calendar No. 110

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 315

[Report No. 107–336]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 1) to close the

achievement gap with accountability, flexibility,and choice, so that no child is left behind.

DECEMBER 13 (legislative day, DECEMBER 12), 2001

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
AFS

- 15

- 183

- P February 1 1 , 2015

Ms. Carol Vierling Acting Regulatory Affairs Manager Invacare Corporation One Invacare Way Elyria, Ohio 44033

Dear Ms. Vierling:

This letter is in response to your letters, dated November 6, 2014 and December 4, 2014, clarifying the purpose of your previous letter, dated August 5, 2014, to notify the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) that modifications had been made to the Invac are XPO2 Portable Oxygen Concentrator (POC) (XPO100 and XPO100B).

Your recent correspondence clarified that XPO100 and XPO 100B were ordering codes for the Invacare XPO2, included in the original 2008 Petition for Rulemaking, and that they were always i ncluded under the FAA approval of the Invacare XPO2 POC for use on aircraft. The FAA has reviewed the related documents and agrees that the Invacare XPO2 POC includes POCs with order numbers XPO100 and XPO100B. Therefore, it is unnecessary to add

XPO100 an d XPO100B to the list of POCs approved for use on aircraft in SFAR No. 106.

The FAA finds that no additional documents from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) must be submitted to the FAA prior to the use of the modified XPO2 (XPO100 and XPO100B) on a ircraft. Further, t he FAA also notes that on August 5, 2014, Invacare submitted positive testing results to the FAA for the modified XPO2 (XPO100 and XPO100B) regarding compliance with RTCA/DO

- 160F, Section 21, Category M. The FAA

finds that no additional positive testing results must be submitted to the FAA prior to the use of the modified XPO2 (XPO100 and XPO100B) on aircraft.

However, due to the increase in lithium content in the lithium cells and lithium batteries, the FAA finds that a Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) determination that the modified XPO2 (XPO100 and XPO100B) does not contain hazardous materials must be submitted to the FAA prior to the use of the modified XPO2 (XPO100 and XPO100B) on aircraft.2
After th orough review of this issue and documentation submitted by Invacare, the FAA has

determined that amendment to SFAR No. 106 is unn ecessary. Therefore, docket FAA

- 2013

- 1013 is being closed.

If you have any additional questions, please contact DK Deaderick, dk.deaderick@faa.gov

, 202

- 267

- 7480.

Sincerely,

/s/ John Barbagallo Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service
RVAAC	Communications	Sub-committee #11

January	8,	2015

1:00-3:00	PM

Agenda

Call-in	Number: 888-396-7314	or	773-756-0935

Password: 8020595

CART: www.streamtext.net/player?event=ACCEESSBOARD010815

1. Welcome	and	Self-introductions

2. Brief	Review	of	November	teleconference	meeting

 Melissa	Shurland	(FRA)discussed	back	up	power	for	the	variable	

message	systems,	she	stated	there	were	no	FRA	regulations	that

would	prevent	the	VMS	system	being	connected	to	the	emergency	

power	system

 There	was	a	discussion	of	how	emergency	communications	are	

made	to	passengers	

 The	use	of	the	Hearing	Loop	symbol	on	trains	was	discussed.	

Interior	and	exterior	signs	were	recommended,	also	whether	the	

interior	sign	should	light	up	when	the	PA	system	was	used.

 There	was	a	discussion	of	whether	the	VMS	had	to	be	exactly	the	

same	as	the	audible	message	and	if	the	audible	had	to	be	played	

every	time	the	VMS	was	used,	or	could	the	VMS	stay	lit	and	over	

the time	the	audible	message	was repeated	as	for stop	

announcements.

3. Discuss	requirements	for	alarms	system	requirements	for	rail	vehicles

4. Discuss	where	the	International	Symbol	of	Accessibility	should	be	

required.

5. Discuss final	report	to	the	full	committee	

6. Next	meeting:	Full	Committee	meeting	in	DC	February	26	and	27

7. Adjourn	

[No	Attachments]