alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 390.40 What responsibilities do intermodal equipment providers have under the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (49 CFR parts 350-399)? An intermodal equipment provider must— ( a ) Identify its operations to the FMCSA by filing the Form MCSA-1 required by § 390.201.
( b ) Mark its intermodal equipment with the USDOT number as required by § 390.21 before tendering the equipment to a motor carrier.
( c ) Systematically inspect, repair, and maintain, or cause to be systematically inspected, repaired, and maintained, in a manner consistent with § 396.3(a)(1), as applicable, all intermodal equipment intended for interchange with a motor carrier.
( d ) Provide intermodal equipment intended for interchange that is in safe and proper operating condition.
( e ) Maintain a system of driver vehicle inspection reports submitted to the intermodal equipment provider as required by § 396.11 of this chapter.
( f ) Maintain a system of inspection, repair, and maintenance records as required by § 396.3(b)(3) of this chapter for equipment intended for interchange with a motor carrier.
( g ) Periodically inspect equipment intended for interchange, as required under § 396.17 of this chapter.
( h ) At facilities at which the intermodal equipment provider makes intermodal equipment available for interchange, have procedures in place, and provide sufficient space, for drivers to perform a pre-trip inspection of tendered intermodal equipment.
( i ) At facilities at which the intermodal equipment provider makes intermodal equipment available for interchange, develop and implement procedures to repair any equipment damage, defects, or deficiencies identified as part of a pre-trip inspection, or replace the equipment, prior to the driver's departure. The repairs or replacement must be made after being notified by a driver of such damage, defects, or deficiencies.
( j ) Refrain from placing intermodal equipment in service on the public highways if that equipment has been found to pose an imminent hazard, as defined in § 386.72(b)(3) of this chapter.
[73 FR 76822, Dec. 17, 2008, as amended at 74 FR 68708, Dec. 29, 2009; 78 FR 58483, Sept. 24, 2013; 79 FR 59457, Oct. 2, 2014; 80 FR 63712, Oct. 21, 2015] Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 82 FR 5318, Jan. 17, 2017, § 390.40 was suspended, effective Jan. 14, 2017.
Local Afghan security forces give IED awareness training to school children in Pul-e Khumri
 By None  , Combined Joint Special Operations Task Force Afghanistan Media Operations Center
  Local Afghan security forces teach children at the Qala-i-Khoja school how to identify improvised explosive devices, Aug. 28. (U.S. Army photo/ Released)
 Roughly 30% percent of the IEDs reported to Afghan National Security  Forces are discovered by children, according to a Special Operations  Forces adviser. In order for the instructors to visit the school, Sayeed Mansoor, the  director for the Baghlan Provincial Ministry of Education, was contacted  and agreed that it was important to teach the children about IEDs to  keep them safe. During the class, pictures of actual IEDs found along routes the children walk to attend school were displayed to the students. One student explained that, until this class, he had only been warned  about IEDs, but had never been shown what to be cautious of. “This awareness class for the kids presents an excellent opportunity for  them to identify and report IEDs directly to Afghan security forces,  which ultimately keeps them safe and limits the insurgents’ ability to  follow through with attacks,” said the SOF adviser. Originally, only two schools were going to participate in the IED  awareness training. However, due to the positive feedback from students,  teachers and headmasters about the program, it was extended to other  schools in the area. The training will continue throughout the Pul-e  Khumri and Dahana-ye Ghori districts.
EXHIBIT 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc.
(PNBC) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I Todd D. Fanning, Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer of PNBC, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of PNBC.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|/s/   Todd D. Fanning                                  
|-------------------------------------------------------
|Todd D. FanningVice-President & Chief Financial Officer

August 8, 2005

23

---
1210-AB32-2-1461.html[7/26/2015 5:31:24 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwf-cas2

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1957

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

"Im smart enough to plan for my own retirement!"
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 14, 2014

NO. 03-13-00320-CR

Javier Cabrera Moya, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, ROSE, AND GOODWIN

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court on April 18, 2013. 

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no 

reversible error in the court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial 

court’s judgment of conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no 

adjudication of costs is made.
Feb. 27: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL in Syria and Iraq
 By CJTF - Operation Inherent Resolve News Release
  February 27, 2015 Release # 20150227FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **SOUTHWEST ASIA -** On Feb. 26, U.S. and Coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria, using attack, fighter, bomber and remotely piloted aircraft to conduct 20 airstrikes. Separately, U.S. and Coalition military forces conducted 11 airstrikes in Iraq, using attack, fighter and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL terrorists. All strikes took place between 8 a.m., Feb. 26, and 8 a.m., Feb. 27, local time. The following is a summary of the strikes conducted since the last press release: Syria*       Near Al Hasakah, three airstrikes struck two ISIL tactical units and destroyed an ISIL armored vehicle and an ISIL VBIED. *       Near Dayr az Zawr, an airstrike struck a crude oil collection point. *       Near Kobani, 13 airstrikes struck an ISIL large tactical unit, eight ISIL tactical units, three ISIL fighting positions and destroyed 21 ISIL fighting positions, two ISIL staging areas, two ISIL tanks and three ISIL vehicles. *       Near Tal Harris, three airstrikes struck three ISIL tactical units and destroyed an ISIL vehicle and an ISIL checkpoint. Iraq*       Near Al Asad, three airstrikes struck three ISIL tactical units and destroyed an ISIL building. *       Near Fallujah, an airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL building. *       Near Mosul, two airstrikes struck an ISIL checkpoint and an ISIL vehicle. *       Near Hit in Al Anbar Province, an airstrike stuck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL vehicle. *       Near Ramadi, three airstrikes struck two ISIL tactical units and destroyed two ISIL buildings and an ISIL armored vehicle. *       Near Rawah, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL armored vehicle. Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely. The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria, the region, and the wider international community. The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Iraq include Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, Netherlands, United Kingdom and the U.S. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Syria include Bahrain, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and the U.S.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                            8088
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4338
<ALLOWANCES>                                        38
<INVENTORY>                                       4386
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2073
<PP&E>                                            3138
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1915
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   23123
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5735
<BONDS>                                            111
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           733
<OTHER-SE>                                       14281
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     23123
<SALES>                                          29521
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 29521
<CGS>                                            13698
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    13698
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 10068
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (165)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   5920
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2298
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3622
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3622
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .93


</TABLE>
Data Needed on Chromium Electroplating and Anodizing Facilities

 Facility Data

o Name

o Location

o Lat-Long Coordinates

 Process Type

o Hard chromium electroplating 

o Decorative chromium electroplating

o Trivalent chromium electroplating 

o Chromium anodizing

o Other electroplating

o Other co-located processes subject to NESHAP

 Tank Design and Operation

o Dimensions

o Rectifier capacity

o Annual hours of operation (permitted and actual)

 Emission Control Technology

o Type of control method or control device

o Control device operating parameters (e.g., bath surface tension)

 Emission Test Data 

o Complete test report (if available)

 Other Available Supporting Documents

o Emission inventory report

o Permit application

o Operating permit
§ 673.21 General requirements. Each transit agency must establish and implement a Safety Management System under this part. A transit agency Safety Management System must be appropriately scaled to the size, scope and complexity of the transit agency and include the following elements: ( a ) Safety Management Policy as described in § 673.23;
( b ) Safety Risk Management as described in § 673.25;
( c ) Safety Assurance as described in § 673.27; and
( d ) Safety Promotion as described in § 673.29.
# Bahrain King Visits Naval Forces Central Command

/ Published Aug. 20, 2019
MANAMA, Bahrain, 

                His Majesty, King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa, the King of the Kingdom of Bahrain, center, Vice Adm. Jim Malloy, commander of U.S. Naval Forces Central Command, U.S. 5th Fleet, right, and the U.S. Ambassador to the Kingdom of Bahrain, the honorable Justin Siberell, pose for a photo during a visit to discuss operations in the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations. The King was accompanied by two of his sons, His Highness Maj. Gen. Shaikh Nasser bin Hamad Al-Khalifa, commander of the Bahraini Royal Guard, and His Highness Lt. Col. Shaikh Khaled bin Hamad Al Khalifa, commander of the Bahraini Royal Guard Rapid Intervention Force along with other top Bahraini military leaders. Bahrain has been a partner with the United States in regional maritime security for more than 70 years. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Dawson Roth/Released)            

                Bahrain King Visits Naval Forces Central Command            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Petty Officer 3rd Class Dawson R

VIRIN: 190819-N-KZ419-1051
1210-AB32-2-1137.html[7/24/2015 6:27:44 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvq-1d2d

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1631

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Ann Callahan

Address:

3861 N Mulberry Dr Apt 2409

Kansas City, MO, 64116

Email: galgirl330@gmail.com

Phone: 4023198862

General Comment

I'm smart enough to plan for my own retirement.
§ 674.41 Conflicts of interest. ( a ) An SSOA must be financially and legally independent from any rail fixed guideway public transportation system under the oversight of the SSOA, unless the Administrator has issued a waiver of this requirement in accordance with § 674.13(b).
( b ) An SSOA may not employ any individual who provides services to a rail fixed guideway public transportation system under the oversight of the SSOA, unless the Administrator has issued a waiver of this requirement in accordance with § 674.13(b).
( c ) A contractor may not provide services to both an SSOA and a rail fixed guideway public transportation system under the oversight of that SSOA, unless the Administrator has issued a waiver of this prohibition.
#### § 596.1 Scope.

This part describes the test devices to be used for compliance testing of motor vehicles with motor vehicle safety standards for automatic emergency braking.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

KAYLA M. SUPANCIK, AN INCAPACITED 

PERSON, BY ELIZABETH SUPANCIK, 

PLENARY GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON 

AND ESTATE, AND APRIL SUPANCIK, 

INDIVIDUALLY,

Petitioners

v.

TYLER M. ROBINSON,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 378 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

KAYLA M. SUPANCIK, AN INCAPACITED 

PERSON, BY ELIZABETH SUPANCIK, 

PLENARY GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON 

AND ESTATE, AND APRIL SUPANCIK, 

INDIVIDUALLY,

Respondents

v.

TYLER M. ROBINSON, 

Cross Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 401 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of December, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
1210-AB32-2-1357.html[7/26/2015 2:20:39 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvz-bjz9

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1853

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: John McGowan

General Comment

I want no rules or regulations put on my nest egg. DC can't run social security,or any other program for that

 matter. Stay out of my retirement!
#### § 599.503 Access to records.

The Administrator shall have the right to enter onto the premises of manufacturers, dealers, salvage auctions and disposal facilities during normal business hours in order to: access, inspect and audit records and other sources of information maintained by any of these entities under this Program; to inspect vehicles traded in or sold under this program, including taking all actions necessary to determine whether trade-in vehicles have operative engines; and/or to interview persons who may have relevant knowledge.
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. §1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the
quarterly report of Alfacell Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended January 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kuslima Shogen, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge: 1.
The Report fully complies
 with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934; and2.
The information contained
 in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
 condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: March 12, 2009/s/ Kuslima ShogenName:
Kuslima ShogenTitle:
Chief
 Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive
 Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer) A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Alfacell
Corporation and will be retained by Alfacell Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.197 What happens when an employer receives a report of a dilute urine specimen? ( a ) As the employer, if the MRO informs you that a positive drug test was dilute, you simply treat the test as a verified positive test. You must not direct the employee to take another test based on the fact that the specimen was dilute.
( b ) As an employer, if the MRO informs you that a negative test was dilute, take the following action: ( 1 ) If the MRO directs you to conduct a recollection under direct observation (*i.e.,* because the creatinine concentration of the specimen was equal to or greater than 2mg/dL, but less than or equal to 5 mg/dL (*see* § 40.155(c)), you must do so immediately.
( 2 ) Otherwise (*i.e.,* if the creatinine concentration of the dilute specimen is greater than 5 mg/dL), you may, but are not required to, direct the employee to take another test immediately. ( i ) Such recollections must not be collected under direct observation, unless there is another basis for use of direct observation (see § 40.67 (b) and (c)).
( ii ) You must treat all employees the same for this purpose. For example, you must not retest some employees and not others. You may, however, establish different policies for different types of tests (*e.g.,* conduct retests in pre-employment situations, but not in random test situations). You must inform your employees in advance of your decisions on these matters.
( c ) The following provisions apply to all tests you direct an employee to take under paragraph (b) of this section: ( 1 ) You must ensure that the employee is given the minimum possible advance notice that he or she must go to the collection site;
( 2 ) You must treat the result of the test you directed the employee to take under paragraph (b) of this section—and not a prior test—as the test result of record, on which you rely for purposes of this part;
( 3 ) If the result of the test you directed the employee to take under paragraph (b)(1) of this section is also negative and dilute, you are not permitted to make the employee take an additional test because the result was dilute.
( 4 ) If the result of the test you directed the employee to take under paragraph (b)(2) of this section is also negative and dilute, you are not permitted to make the employee take an additional test because the result was dilute. Provided, however, that if the MRO directs you to conduct a recollection under direct observation under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, you must immediately do so.
( 5 ) If the employee declines to take a test you directed him or her to take under paragraph (b) of this section, the employee has refused the test for purposes of this part and DOT agency regulations.
[68 FR 31626, May 28, 2003, as amended at 69 FR 64867, Nov. 9, 2004; 73 FR 35974, June 25, 2008]
§ 33.51 General procedures. When the Department of Transportation plans to execute its allocations authority to address a supply problem within its resource jurisdiction, the Department shall develop a plan that includes the following information: ( a ) A copy of the written determination made in accordance with section 202 of Executive Order 13603, that the program or programs that would be supported by the allocation action are necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense;
( b ) A detailed description of the situation to include any unusual events or circumstances that have created the requirement for an allocation action;
( c ) A statement of the specific objective(s) of the allocation action;
( d ) A list of the materials, services, or facilities to be allocated;
( e ) A list of the sources of the materials, services, or facilities that will be subject to the allocation action;
( f ) A detailed description of the provisions that will be included in the allocation orders, including the type(s) of allocation orders, the percentages or quantity of capacity or output to be allocated for each purpose, and the duration of the allocation action (*e.g.,* anticipated start and end dates);
( g ) An evaluation of the impact of the proposed allocation action on the civilian market; and
( h ) Proposed actions, if any, to mitigate disruptions to civilian market operations.
From: Jay Ballanger [mailto:jballanger@cableone.net] 

Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 9:22 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

I am writing in support of RIN 1210-AB32. Financial advisors definitely need to be more 

transparent in their practices. I currently use the services of a fee-only advisor and am much 

happier with her services and financial advice. I used to have a so-called financial advisor who 

sold me on mutual funds and life insurance for which he collected huge fees and commissions 

(unbeknownst to me). The amount of the fees and commissions were not immediately visible. I 

can say I'm so much happier and confident now that I'm working with a fee-only financial 

planner. They are transparent, have my best interests at heart, and are not trying to sell me 

something that benefits THEM.

Thank you,

Jay Ballanger

--