alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.221 Where does an alcohol test take place? ( a ) A DOT alcohol test must take place at an alcohol testing site meeting the requirements of this section.
( b ) If you are operating an alcohol testing site, you must ensure that it meets the security requirements of § 40.223.
( c ) If you are operating an alcohol testing site, you must ensure that it provides visual and aural privacy to the employee being tested, sufficient to prevent unauthorized persons from seeing or hearing test results.
( d ) If you are operating an alcohol testing site, you must ensure that it has all needed personnel, materials, equipment, and facilities to provide for the collection and analysis of breath and/or saliva samples, and a suitable clean surface for writing.
( e ) If an alcohol testing site fully meeting all the visual and aural privacy requirements of paragraph (c) is not readily available, this part allows a reasonable suspicion or post-accident test to be conducted at a site that partially meets these requirements. In this case, the site must afford visual and aural privacy to the employee to the greatest extent practicable.
( f ) An alcohol testing site can be in a medical facility, a mobile facility (*e.g.,* a van), a dedicated collection facility, or any other location meeting the requirements of this section.
CLARENCE DREIER AND BRAD DREIER

, Appellant s ,

v.

WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 6186

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 22, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County

. Paul A. Rasmussen , Judge

. Davisson F. Dunlap, Jr. and Rebekah A. Smith of Dunlap & Shipman, P.A., Tallahass ee , for Appellant s

.
Samuel M. Nelson of Burr & Forman, LLP, Orlando , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS

, MARSTILLER

, and SWANSON

, J J

. , CONCUR.
From: tseawell [mailto:tseawell@bellsouth.net] 

Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 1:30 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN1210-AB33

Trash this proposal!!!I like my IRAjust like it is!!!!
<Page>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 16 to Registration
Statement No. 33-71688 of First Fortis Life Insurance Company Separate
Account A on Form N-4, of our report dated February 25, 2004 relating to the
statements of assets and liabilities of First Fortis Life Insurance Company
Separate Account A as of December 31, 2003, and the related statements of
operations for the year then ended and the statements of changes in net
assets for each of the two years ended December 31, 2003 appearing in the
Statement of Additional Information, which is part of such Registration
Statement, and to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such
Statement of Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
April 5, 2004
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 31999Y0717(01)

**Declarations on Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission***Official Journal C 203 , 17/07/1999 P. 0001 - 0001*

DECLARATIONS ON COUNCIL DECISION 1999/468/EC

of 28 June 1999

laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission

(1999/C 203/01)

1. COMMISSION STATEMENT (ad Article 4)

Under the management procedure, the Commission would recall that its constant practice is to try to secure a satisfactory decision which will also muster the widest possible support within the Committee.

The commission will take account of the position of the members of the Committee and act in such a way as to avoid going against any predominant position which might emerge against the appropriateness of an implementing measure.

2. COUNCIL AND COMMISSION STATEMENT

The Commission and the Council agree that provisions relating to committees assisting the Commission in the exercise of implementing powers provided for in application of Decision 87/373/EEC should be adjusted without delay in order to align them with Articles 3, 4, 5 and 6 of Decision 1999/468/EC in accordance with the appropriate legislative procedures.

Such adjustment should be made as follows:

- current procedure I would be turned into the new advisory procedure;

- current procedures II(a) and II(b) would be turned into the new management procedure;

- current procedures III(a) and III(b) would be turned into the new regulatory procedure.

a modification of the type of committee provided for in a basic instrument should be made, on a case by case basis, in the course of normal revision of legislation, guided inter alia by the criteria provided for in Article 2.

Such adjustment or modification should be made in compliance with the obligations incumbent on the Community institutions. It should not have the effect of jeopardising attainment of the objectives of the basic instrument or the effectiveness of Community action.

3. COMMISSION STATEMENT (ad Article 5)

In the review of proposals for implementing measures concerning particularly sensitive sectors, the Commission, in order to find a balanced solution, will act in such a way as to avoid going against any predominant position which might emerge within the Council against the appropriateness of an implementing measure.
Nov. 26: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL in Syria and Iraq
 By U.S. Central Command News Release
  November 26, 2014 RELEASE #20141118FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**** **TAMPA, Fla., Nov. 24, 2014 —** U.S. military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria Nov. 24-26 using bomber and fighter aircraft to conduct ten airstrikes. Separately, U.S. and partner nation military forces conducted seven airstrikes in Iraq Nov. 24-26 using attack, fighter and remotely-piloted aircraft against ISIL terrorists. In Syria, ten airstrikes near Kobani struck an ISIL fighting position, a large ISIL unit, two tactical ISIL units, and destroyed four ISIL staging areas and six ISIL fighting positions. In Iraq, two airstrikes near Mosul destroyed an ISIL bulldozer, two ISIL vehicles, three ISIL-occupied buildings and an ISIL fighting position, and also struck a large ISIL unit. Near Kirkuk, two airstrikes destroyed an ISIL tank, an ISIL HMMWV and an ISIL vehicle, as well as struck two ISIL units. North of Sinjar, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL HMMWV and an ISIL vehicle. Northwest of Ramadi, an airstrike damaged an ISIL checkpoint. Finally, west of Bayji, an airstrike destroyed one ISIL vehicle and damaged another. All aircraft returned to base safely. Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the terrorist group ISIL and the threat they pose to Iraq, the region and the wider international community. The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group's ability to project power and conduct operations. Coalition nations conducting airstrikes in Iraq include the U.S., Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Coalition Nations conducting airstrikes in Syria include the U.S., Bahrain, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.
Editorial Note on Part 397
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 397 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 397.1 Application of the rules in this part. ( a ) The rules in this part apply to each motor carrier engaged in the transportation of hazardous materials by a motor vehicle which must be marked or placarded in accordance with § 177.823 of this title and to— ( 1 ) Each officer or employee of the motor carrier who performs supervisory duties related to the transportation of hazardous materials; and
( 2 ) Each person who operates or who is in charge of a motor vehicle containing hazardous materials.
( b ) Each person designated in paragraph (a) of this section must know and obey the rules in this part.
[36 FR 4876, Mar. 13, 1971, as amended at 36 FR 16067, Aug. 19, 1971; 53 FR 18058, May 19, 1988; 60 FR 38749, July 28, 1995]
----

(2004/C 88 E/0737)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0921/04

by Proinsias De Rossa (PSE) to the Commission

(26 March 2004)

Subject:   Israeli nuclear arms

Can the Commission outline its position on Israel's failure to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and the lack of scrutiny by the United Nations nuclear watchdog, IAEA, of Israel's nuclear programme?

What steps are the Commission and Member States taking to create a nuclear-free zone in the Middle East?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(29 April 2004)

Signature of the Non-Proliferation Treaty is on a voluntary basis.

The EU Strategy against the proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, adopted in December 2003, reflects the very high priority the Union puts on multilateral non-proliferation and disarmament Treaties and Conventions. One specific action of the Strategy refers to a diplomatic démarche to foster adherence, compliance and universalisation of Treaties and Conventions. The EU and the Commission use every opportunity to recall to Israel the importance of confidence building at regional level.

----
§ 673.1 Applicability. ( a ) This part applies to any State, local governmental authority, and any other operator of a public transportation system that receives Federal financial assistance under 49 U.S.C. chapter 53.
( b ) This part does not apply to an operator of a public transportation system that only receives Federal financial assistance under 49 U.S.C. 5310, 49 U.S.C. 5311, or both 49 U.S.C. 5310 and 49 U.S.C. 5311 unless it operates a rail fixed guideway public transportation system.
###### Editorial Note on Part 385

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 385.304 [Reserved]
----

(2004/C 84 E/0234)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0287/04

by Caroline Lucas (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(6 February 2004)

Subject:   Mislabelling of seal oil in the EU

Is the Commission aware of the fact that many Member States are currently placing on the EU market products containing oil from Canadian harp and hooded seals and that this oil is mislabelled as ‘marine oil’, ‘fish oil’ or ‘fat oil’?

Is the Commission aware of the fact that seal oil from Canadian harp and hooded seals is currently used by some EU industries in several commonly consumed products such as pharmaceuticals, nutritional supplements for human use, pet food and animal feed using the above-mentioned misleading terms on their labels?

Given the existing stringent EU legislation on the labelling of products, in particular of nutritional supplements, as well as on consumer and health protection, is the Commission going to ensure that these products do not stay on the EU market with the current misleading label? Furthermore, given that many European citizens have ethical concerns about Canadian seal hunting, will the Commission ensure that this seal oil is labelled with the term ‘Canadian Seal oil’ in order to safeguard consumer choice?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(15 March 2004)

General legislation on the labelling of foodstuffs (1) lays down labelling requirements in order to ensure that consumers have information on the objective characteristics of products, such as the name under which the product is sold, the ingredients, the quantity or durability.

With regard to the designation of ingredients on labels, Directive 2000/13/EC provides that ingredients must be referred to by their specific name. Refined oils, however, may be included in the list of ingredients under the category name ‘oil’, followed either by an indication of the type, i.e. ‘vegetable’ or ‘animal’, or by an indication of the specific animal or vegetable origin.

In line with these provisions, the ingredient ‘seal oil’ must be referred to by the terms ‘animal oil’ or ‘seal oil’.

The designations mentioned by the Honourable Member therefore do not comply with these provisions, and it is up to the national monitoring authorities to take measures to rectify the situation. Member States have in any case been reminded of these points.

Allowing for exceptions, it is compulsory to indicate the origin or provenance of foodstuffs only where failure to give such particulars might mislead the consumer to a material degree as to the true origin or provenance of the foodstuff.

----

(1)  Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the labelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs, OJ L 109, 6.5.2000 Directive last amended by Directive 2003/89/EC, OJ L 301, 25.11.2003.

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avatar Systems Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert C. Shreve, Jr., President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

          (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

          (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

|                       | AVATAR SYSTEMS, INC. |
|----------------------------|----------------------|
|                       |                 |   |
| **Dated: August 12, 2005** | By:                  | /s/ROBERT C. SHREVE,   JR. |
|                       |                 |  |
|                       |                 | Robert C.   Shreve, Jr. |
|                       |                 | Chief   Executive Officer |
|                       |                 | Chief   Financial Officer |

          A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,251
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,107
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,712
<PP&E>                                         135,518
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 148,979
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,153
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           133
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,547
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   148,979
<SALES>                                         11,292
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,614
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,247
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,428
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,297
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,358)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,135)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,223)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,223)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.18)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

     Certification of Periodic Financial Report



     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, the undersigned,  Richard A. Bianco, the Chief
Executive  Officer of AmBase  Corporation (the "issuer"),  hereby certifies that
the report on Form 10-K  accompanying  this  certification  (the "report") fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  section  13(A) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1937 (15 U.S.C. 78 m or 78o(d)) and that  information  contained
in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the issuer.



/s/Richard  A.  Bianco
Richard A.  Bianco
Chairman,  President  and
Chief Executive Officer
AmBase Corporation
March 25, 2004
<Page>


                                                    [LOGO]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to Registration
Statement No. 333-65233 of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company Variable Account D
on Form N-4, of our report dated February 25, 2004 relating to the statements of
assets and liabilities of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company Variable Account D
as of December 31, 2003, and the related statements of operations for the year
then ended and the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years
ended December 31, 2003 appearing in the Statement of Additional Information,
which is part of such Registration Statement, and to the reference to us under
the heading "Experts" in such Statement of Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
April 5, 2004
From: ZZDRAGON@aol.com [mailto:ZZDRAGON@aol.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2010 1:29 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

I just read the Employee 

Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the plan qualification rules 

under the Internal Revenue Code (Code) to determine whether, and, if 

so, how, the Agencies could or should enhance, by regulation or 

otherwise, the retirement security of participants in employersponsored retirement plans and in individual retirement arrangements 

(IRAs) by facilitating access to, and use of, lifetime income or other 

arrangements designed to provide a lifetime stream of income after 

retirement. 

 

I'm going to say a big NO about this. I earned the money and I'll spend it the way I want to. I 

planned ahead for my retirement and lived within my means. The US Gov has a big problem with 

doing the same. Where is the SS money that has been paid in to it's fund. Congress 

BARROWED it and now cant pay it back the govt has borrowed to much and now is going to 

have to cut just like General Motors. 

 

Leave my money alone! 

 

Gary Obert 

2021 Lost Greens Dr 

Mission, TX 78572
# March 31: Military airstrikes continue against ISIS terrorists in Syria and Iraq 

/ Published March 31, 2017
**SOUTHWEST ASIA —**
§ 541.3 Application. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) and (c) of this section, this standard applies to the following: ( 1 ) Passenger motor vehicle parts identified in § 541.5(a) that are present in: ( i ) Passenger cars; and
( ii ) Multipurpose passenger vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating of 6,000 pounds or less; and
( iii ) Light-duty trucks with a gross vehicle weight rating of 6,000 pounds or less, that NHTSA has determined to be high theft in accordance with 49 CFR 542.1; and
( iv ) Light duty trucks with a gross vehicle weight rating of 6,000 pounds or less, that NHTSA has determined to be subject to the requirements of this section in accordance with 49 CFR 542.2.
( 2 ) Replacement passenger motor vehicle parts identified in § 541.5(a) for vehicles listed in paragraphs (1)(i) to (iv) of this section.
( b ) *Exclusions.* This standard does not apply to the following: ( 1 ) Passenger motor vehicle parts identified in § 541.5(a) that are present in vehicles manufactured by a motor vehicle manufacturer that manufactures fewer than 5,000 vehicles for sale in the United States each year.
( 2 ) Passenger motor vehicle parts identified in § 541.5(a) that are present in a line with an annual production of not more than 3,500 vehicles.
( 3 ) Passenger motor vehicle parts identified in § 541.5(a) that are present in light-duty trucks with a gross vehicle weight rating of 6,000 pounds or less, that NHTSA has determined to be subject to the requirements of this section in accordance with 49 CFR 542.2, if the vehicle line with which these light-duty trucks share majority of major interchangeable parts is exempt from parts marking requirements pursuant to part 543.
( c ) For vehicles listed in subparagraphs (1)(i) to (iv) of this section that are ( 1 ) not subject to the requirements of this standard until September 1, 2006, and
( 2 ) manufactured between September 1, 2006 and August 31, 2007; a manufacturer needs to meet the requirements of this part only for lines representing at least 50% of a manufacturer's total production of these vehicles.
[70 FR 28851, May 19, 2005]
#### § 585.65 Response to inquiries.

At any time prior to August 31, 2007, each manufacturer must, upon request from the Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, provide information identifying the vehicles (by make, model, and vehicle identification number) that have been certified as complying with Standard No. 138. The manufacturer's designation of a vehicle as a certified vehicle is irrevocable. Upon request, the manufacturer also must specify whether it intends to utilize either carry-forward or carry-backward credits, and the vehicles to which those credits relate.