[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 1- 10 07 0 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D. C. Dock etNo. 1 :0 9- cv -0 04 42 -RWS TOPS SALES & SERVIC ES, INC., d.b .a. Top s Sh owb ar, THE A GROUP, INC., Pl ai nt iff s- App el lant s, ve rs us CITY OF FOREST PARK, GEORGIA, a m un ic ip al co rp or at io n, CORINE DEYTON, et al ., Defen da nt s- App el le es .

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e North ernDis tri ctof Ge or gi a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (Au gu st17 , 20 12 ) Befo re CARNES, KRAVITCH an d EDMONDSON, Ci rcu itJu dg es .

Case: 11-10070 Date Filed: 08/17/2012 Page: 1 of 5PER CURI AM:

Pl ai nt iff s- App el lant s To p S al es & Serv ic es , Inc . (“ Top s” ) an d Th e A Group, In c. (“ A Group” ) ap pe al th e d is tri ctco urt’s g ran t o f Defen da nt s’ Rul e 1 2( b) (6 ) m ot io n t o d is m is s an d app eal th e d is tri ctco urt’s d en ia l o f Pl ai nt iff s’ sec on d m ot io n t o a m en d. No rev ers ib le erro r ha s b eensh own ; we af firm . Fro m 19 93 un ti l 2 00 8, Re d Eyed, In c. (“ REI”) l eas edpro pe rty from A Gro up an d o pe rat edanadul t en te rta in m en t es tabl is hm en t atth e le as edpre m is es un de r a v al idli cen se is su edto REI by the Cit y of F or es t Pa rk(th e “ Ci ty”). Ant ic ip at in g R EI’s dep artur e fro m th e p ro pe rty, T op s en te redin to a le as e ag reem en t wi th A Group i n 2 00 8; th e in te nd edus e o f th e le as edpre m is es by T op s was als o a s an adul t en te rta in m en t es tabl is hm en t. To t ha t en d, i n M arch 20 08 , Top s ap pl ie d t o the Cit y

foradul t en te rta in m en t an d a lc oh ol li cen se s fo r th e le as ed pr em is es . In J un e 2 00 8 -- whi le st il l a t en an t o f A Group a ndwhi le st il l o pe rat in g anadul t en te rta in m en t es tabl is hm en t atth e p rem is es lea se d fr om A Group und er an nu al li cen se s tha t d idno t ex pi re u nt il 31 Decem be r 20 08 -- REI ap pl ie d t o the Ci ty for adul t en te rta in m en t an d a lc oh ol li cen se s fo r a p ro pe rty adjace ntto th e A Gro up pro pe rty.

2

Case: 11-10070 Date Filed: 08/17/2012 Page: 2 of 5The ap pl ic at io ns fil edby T op s an d b y REI were m ad e ata ti m e whe n the 19 97 Adu ltEnt ert ai nm en t Ord in an ce (“ 19 97 Ordi na nc e”) was ineffe ct ; the 19 97 Ord in an ce was rep la cedby an am en de d o rd in an ce i n 2 00 9, wh ic h was th en rep la cedby an am en de d o rd in an ce i n 2 01 0. Th e 1 99 7 Ord in an ce ap pl ie d t o the li cen se ap pl ic at io ns fil edby T op s an d R EI in20 08 . The 1 99 7 Ord in an ce pr ecl ud edth e is su an ce o f anadul t en te rta in m en t l ic en se if the pre mis es wher e th e li cen se e p ro po se d t o o pe rat e were s itua te d wi th in 15 00 feetof ali cen se d a du lt en te rta in m en t es tabl is hm en t. The 15 00 -fo otli m it at io n was ret ai ne d i n b ot h the 20 09 an d 2 01 0 a m en de d o rd in an ces . InAug us t 2 00 8, the Cit y

en act edtwo res ol ut io ns th at , insubs tanc e, ap pr ov edth e tr an sf

er o f lo cat io n o f REI fro m it s cu rren tl y

li cen se d p rem is es on th e A Group p ro pe rty to i ts ne wly le as edsp ace a djac en t t o tha t p ro pe rty; th e is su an ce o f th e n ew adul t en te rta in m en t l ic en se to REI te rm in at edREI’s adul t en te rta in m en t l ic en se at t he pre m is es itha d l eas edfro m A Group. So on th erea fte r, th e Ci ty enact eda 18 0- da y m or at or iu m

on th e is su an ce o f adul t en te rta in m en t li cen se s. Itwas n otun ti l Fe br ua ry 20 09 th atth e Ci ty con si de red-- an d d en ie d -- Top s’ pen di ng ap pl ic at io n: Top s’ pro po se d l oc at io n, o ne ad jacen t t o R EI’s new lo cat io n, v io la te d the 15 00 -fo ot -d is tanc e requi rem en t.

3 Case: 11-10070 Date Filed: 08/17/2012 Page: 3 of 5Pl ai nt iff s ad va nc e a l it an y

of c on st itut io na l ch al le ng es to th e 1 99 7 Ord in an ce an d the 20 09 am en dm en t o f th atord in an ce. Als o P la in ti ffs so ug ht le av e to am en d i ts co m

pl ai ntto rai se th os e ch al le ng es un de r th e 2 01 0 a m en dm en t. Ina co m pr eh en si ve 33 -p ag e o pi ni on , th e d is tri ctco urt ad dr es se d fu ll y Pla in ti ffs ’ cl ai m s; itco nc lu de d n on e were ju st ic iabl e. W e ag ree. * The ch al le ng es to th e 1 99 7 Ord in an ce an d the 20 09 am en de d o rd in an ce ar e m oo te d b y

th e ad op ti on of t he 20 09 an d 2 01 0 a m en de d o rd in an ces res pe ct iv el y . See Tan ne r Adv ert is in g Gro up , LLC., v. Fay et te Co un ty, Ga., 45 1 F .3d77 7, 7 85 (1 1t h C ir. 2 00 6) (ge ne ral rul e is th ata ch al le ng e to th e co ns ti tu ti on al ity of ast atut e is m oo te d b y

rep eal of t he st atut e). Pl ai nt iff s i nt erp os eda nu m

be r of co un te r arg um en ts to m oo tn es s, b utas f ul ly set o utinth e d is tri ctco urt o pi ni on , no co un te r arg um en t ad va nc edby Plai nt iff s p rev en te d the ir c la im s fr om be co m in g m oo t. Pl ai nt iff s ad va nc e anequa l p ro te ct io n c ha ll en ge to th e Alc oh ol Ordi na nc e. Aga inas e xp la in edby the di st ric t co urt, Pl ai nt iff s fa il edto pl eadad equa te ly a si mil arl y si tu at edco m

pa rat or . Pl ai nt iff s’ arg um en t tha t the de ni al of i ts ap pl ic at io ns am ou nt edto a reg ul at ory

tak in g i n v io lati on of t he Uni te d S ta te s an d Geo rg iaco ns ti tu ti on s al so fai ls to st at e a cl ai m : Pl ai nt iff s fa il edto av ai l i ts el f of

st at e-l aw pr oc es se s; th e One state -law c laim was dismissed without prejudice. * 4

Case: 11-10070 Date Filed: 08/17/2012 Page: 4 of 5cl ai m

is no t ri pe forrev ie w. See Eid e v . Saras ot a Co un ty, 90 8 F .2d71 6, 7 20 -2 1 (1 1t h C ir. 1 99 0) . AndPla in ti ffs ’ co m pl ai ntlac ks su ffi ci en t fa ct s t o s ho w th atno eco no m ic al ly viabl e u se of the A Group p ro pe rty exi st s. Pl ai nt iff s’ cla im s ag ai ns t i nd iv idua l d efen da nt s ar e si m il arl y want in g. Fo r th e in di vi du al de fen da nt s t o b e li ab le forth e d is cret io na ry act s o f whi chPla in ti ffs co m pl ai ns , th e act s m

us t h av e b eendo ne with a ctua l m al ic e. Altho ug h the co m pl ai ntin cl ud es co nc lu so ry all eg at io ns of i nt en ti on al an d wi ll fu l co nduc t, Pl ai nt iff s’ pl ead in gs pro vi de in su ffi ci en t s up po rt t o s ta te a pl au si bl e cl ai m th atth e in di vi du al de fen da nt s ac te d wi th actua l m al ic e. Bec au se no jus ti ci ab le cla im was p le ad ed , Defen dant s’ Rul e 1 2( b) (6 ) m ot io n was du e to be gra nt ed . Becau se , am on g o th er re as on s, Pl ai nt iff s’ reque st ed se co ndam en dm en t o f th e co m pl ai ntwou ldha ve be enfut il e, Pl ai nt iff s s ho w no ab us e o f di sc ret io n i n the di st ric t co urt’s d en ia l o f th atreque st . AFFIRMED.

5 Case: 11-10070 Date Filed: 08/17/2012 Page: 5 of 5