alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 18

- 00345

- CR

Jackie Lee Gandee Jr.
v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the County Court of Matagorda County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2018

- 0021

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
August 9, 2018
§ 826.32 Answer to application. ( a ) Within 30 days after service of an application, counsel representing the agency against which an award is sought may file an answer to the application. Unless agency counsel requests an extension of time for filing or files a statement of intent to negotiate under paragraph (b) of this section, failure to file an answer within the 30-day period may be treated as a consent to the award requested.
( b ) If agency counsel and the applicant believe that the issues in the fee application can be settled, they may jointly file a statement of their intent to negotiate a settlement. The filing of this statement shall extend the time for filing an answer for an additional 30 days, and further extensions may be granted by the administrative law judge upon request by agency counsel and the applicant.
( c ) The answer shall explain in detail any objections to the award requested and identify the facts relied on in support of agency counsel's position. If the answer is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the proceeding, agency counsel shall include with the answer either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under § 826.36.
Docket: EBSA-2010-0007 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in 

Retirement Plans 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0007-0001 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options 

Document: EBSA-2010-0007-DRAFT-0038 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: G Rodgers 

Address: 

702 Woodland Drive 

Port Townsend, WA, 98368 

General Comment 

Please do not take my 401k and IRAs away from me. I have been a “good girl” all my life. I saved 

money and had a standard 30 year mortgage. I stayed in my house and improved it over the year and 

sold it at good increase in the middle of the housing downturn. I now have a smaller home and no 

mortgage. 

I did not speculate widely with my 401k and only lost a small amount in the down turn. I have made 

that up this last year. Please do not now force me into an annuity system because others cannot 

manage their money. If people want to purchase an annuity with their retirement money, fine, there are 

a lot of products out there. Please do not force me to do something with MY MONEY that I do not need 

or want. 

I gave you money and voted for you in the last election, please don’t do this to me. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: March 01, 2010 

Received: February 21, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80aa95d4 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=Print&PrintId=0900006480aa95... 3/1/2010
# I 

# l ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) AICI-Archirodon JV ) ) Under ContractNo. W912ER-12-C-0033 ) APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT: ASBCA No. 60843

Scott M. Heimberg, Esq. Maureen C. Hughes, Esq. Mark J. Groff, Esq. Elise A. Farrell, Esq.

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP Washington, DC APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq. Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney James D. Stephens, Esq. Rebecca L. Bockmann, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorneys U.S. Army Engineer District, Middle East Winchester, VA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The appeal has been settled. Accordingly, it is dismissed from the Board's docket with prejudice. Dated: February 20, 2020

TERRENCE S. HARTMAN Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals

# I I I I 

# I 

# I I .

'

# I I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60843, Appeal ofAICI-Archirodon JV, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 

### PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
# Afghanistan Department of Agriculture, PRT work to expand beekeeping in Konar province

/ Published Dec. 29, 2008

**FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
December 27, 2008                                                                            

Release Number 20082712-03

**Afghanistan Department of Agriculture, PRT work to expand beekeeping in Konar province**

KABUL, Afghanistan  – Surviving primarily on subsistence farming, many Afghans teeter on the edge of malnutrition and starvation every year. In Konar province, one of the most violent provinces in the country, an American provincial reconstruction team is working with the Afghan government on a unique solution to help feed its people: bees.

The Konar Department of Agriculture has a number of small beehives throughout Konar Valley, and has been working to expand the reach of the pollinators. Not only do they hope to breed more bees, they also hope to build more beehives to be distributed among more farmers. This is where sugar comes into play.

With the help of Provincial Reconstruction Team Konar and the United States Department of Agriculture, the Afghan government has been distributing sugar to existing beehives to increase their population. More than 300 pounds of sugar have been provided by the Afghan Government to local beekeepers and farmers. They expect that the bees should be ready to help with the spring pollination of crops. With the help of the bees, they hope to increase the yields of crops in the immediate area by at least 10 percent.

The idea is not as far fetched as it may sound. Bees are a booming business in North America. According to the University of Georgia’s website beekeeping is a $9 billion industry in the United States. Bee hives are bought, sold, and rented out across the country.

In Canada if a blueberry farmer hopes to increase profit he can get a return of $41 per every dollar spent on renting bees for pollination and an apple farmer can get upwards of $192 per dollar. The Konar Government hopes to get a similar return for their investments.

Through pollination, bees have been known to increase the crop yields by as much as 25 percent. Other plants, such as almond trees, must have a pollinator to even produce. During the California almond season, renting a bee colony can cost a farmer as much as $180 for the season.

Bees also produce raw materials for the Afghan people to trade and barter. Honey is an obvious product of successful hives and is especially valuable in this environment because it is one of the few agricultural products that do not have to be stored in cold temperatures. Honey can be easily consumed, sold, or possibly exported to nearby provinces.

Beeswax is also a valuable commodity. Commercially, it is a primary component in candles, cosmetics, polishes and pharmaceuticals. It is the hope of the Afghan beekeepers to one day export these goods to other countries.

-30-**
§ 599.502 Record retention. ( a ) Manufacturers, dealers, salvage auctions, and disposal facilities shall keep records of all transactions under the CARS Act and regulations thereunder for a period of five calendar years from the date on which they were generated or acquired by the manufacturer, salvage auction, dealer, or disposal facility, and shall promptly make those records available to NHTSA Enforcement or DOT's Office of the Inspector General upon request.
( b ) Records to be retained under this subpart include all documentary materials and other information-storing media that contain information concerning transactions under the CARS Program, including any material generated or communicated by computer, electronic mail, or other electronic means. Such records include, but are not limited to, lists, compilations, certifications, dealer application information, salvage auction or disposal facility information, owner eligibility information, vehicle eligibility information (including vehicle fuel economy), dealer applications for reimbursement under the program, vehicle identification number data, vehicle ownership information, vehicle title, registration and insurance information, sales agreements, bills of sale, lease agreements, manufacturer's certificate or statement of origin, other rebate and/or incentive programs used in conjunction with transactions under the program, bank account and routing number information, electronic funds transfer and payment information, reports made to the National Motor Vehicle Title Information System (NMVTIS), reports regarding vehicle scrappage values and payment, reports in connection with the transfer of vehicles to salvage auctions and disposal facilities; reports from disposal facilities in connection with the crushing or shredding of vehicles under the program, and any other documents that are related to transactions.
( c ) Duplicate copies need not be retained. Information may be reproduced or transferred from one storage medium to another (e.g., from electronic format to CD-ROM) as long as no information is lost in the reproduction or transfer, and when so reproduced or transferred the original form may be treated as a duplicate.
H. Res. 427

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 22, 2002.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 3448) to improve the ability of the United

States to prevent, prepare for, and respond to bioterrorism

and other public health emergencies. All points of order

against the conference report and against its consideration

are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 533.2 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to increase the fuel economy of light trucks by establishing minimum levels of average fuel economy for those vehicles.
§ 831.4 Nature of investigation. ( a ) *General.* The NTSB conducts investigations, or has them conducted, to determine the facts, conditions, and circumstances relating to an accident. The NTSB uses these results to determine one or more probable causes of an accident, and to issue safety recommendations to prevent or mitigate the effects of a similar accident. The NTSB is required to report on the facts and circumstances of accidents it investigates. The NTSB begins an investigation by monitoring the situation and assessing available facts to determine the appropriate investigative response. Following an initial assessment, the NTSB notifies persons and organizations it anticipates will be affected as to the extent of its expected investigative response.
( b ) *NTSB products.* An investigation may result in a report or brief of the NTSB's conclusions or other products designed to improve transportation safety. Other products may include factual records, safety recommendations, and other safety information.
( c ) NTSB investigations are fact-finding proceedings with no adverse parties. The investigative proceedings are not subject to the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 551 *et seq.*), and are not conducted for the purpose of determining the rights, liabilities, or blame of any person or entity, as they are not adjudicatory proceedings.
Exhibit 21.1
                    Valero Energy Corporation
                     Schedule of Subsidiaries

Name of Subsidiary                               State of Organization

Valero Energy Corporation                              Delaware
     Valero Management Company                         Delaware
     Valero Corporate Services Company                 Delaware
          Valero Coal Company                          Delaware
          Valero Producing Company                     Delaware
          VMGA Company                                 Texas
     Valero Refining and Marketing Company             Delaware
          Valero Javelina Company                      Delaware
          Valero Refining Company                      Delaware
               Valero MTBE Operating Company           Delaware
               Valero MTBE Investments Company         Delaware
               Valero Technical Services Company       Delaware
               Valero Mediterranean Company            Delaware
               Valero Mexico Company                   Delaware
          Valero Marketing and Supply Company          Delaware
     Valero Natural Gas Company                        Delaware
          Valero Gas Marketing Company                 Delaware
          Valero Gas Marketing Canada Inc.             Alberta, Canada
          Valero Gas Storage Company                   Delaware
          Valero Hydrocarbons Company                  Delaware
          Valero Field Services Company                Delaware
          Valero Power Services Company                Delaware
          Valero Storage and Transfer Company          Delaware
          Valero Transmission Company                  Delaware
               VT Company                              Delaware

     Valero Natural Gas Partners, L.P.                 Delaware
          ValeroTex, L.P.                              Delaware
          Valero Management Partnership, L.P.          Delaware
               Valero Transmission, L.P.               Delaware
               Valero Hydrocarbons, L.P.               Delaware
               Valero Marketing, L.P.                  Delaware
               Valero Industrial Gas, L.P.             Delaware
               Valero Gas Marketing, L.P.              Delaware
               VLDC, L.P.                              Delaware
               Reata Industrial Gas, L.P.              Delaware
               Rivercity Gas, L.P.                     Delaware
§ 593.7 Processing of petitions. ( a ) NHTSA will review each petition for sufficiency under §§ 593.5 and 593.6. If the petition does not contain all the information required by this part, NHTSA notifies the petitioner, pointing out the areas of insufficiency, and stating that the petition will not receive further consideration until the required information is provided. If the additional information is not provided within the time specified by NHTSA in its notification, NHTSA may dismiss the petition as incomplete, and so notify the petitioner. When the petition is complete, its processing continues.
( b ) NHTSA publishes in the Federal Register, affording opportunity for comment, a notice of each petition containing the information required by this part.
( c ) No public hearing, argument, or other formal proceeding is held on a petition filed under this part.
( d ) If the Administrator is unable to determine that the vehicle in a petition submitted under § 593.6(a) is one that is substantially similar, or (if it is substantially similar) is capable of being readily modified to meet the standards, (s)he notifies the petitioner, and offers the petitioner the opportunity to supplement the petition by providing the information required for a petition submitted under paragraph 593.6(b).
( e ) If the Administrator determines that the petition does not clearly demonstrate that the vehicle model is eligible for importation, (s)he denies it and notifies the petitioner in writing. (S)he also publishes in the Federal Register a notice of denial and the reasons for it. A notice of denial also states that the Administrator will not consider a new petition covering the model that is the subject of the denial until at least 3 months from the date of the notice of denial. There is no administrative reconsideration available for petition denials.
( f ) If the Administrator determines that the petition clearly demonstrates that the vehicle model is eligible for importation, (s)he grants it and notifies the petitioner. (S)he also publishes in the Federal Register a notice of grant and the reasons for it.
[54 FR 40099, Sept. 29, 1989, as amended at 55 FR 37330, Sept. 11, 1990]
# General Kurilla Takes Command of U.S. Central Command

/ Published April 1, 2022

Apr. 1, 2022

Release Number 20220401-02

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla.** – The outgoing commander of U.S. Central Command, U.S. Marine Corps Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr., relinquished command today during a change of command ceremony downtown. U.S. Army Gen. Michael “Erik” Kurilla assumed command of CENTCOM from McKenzie. Kurilla previously commanded the XVIII Airborne Corps at Fort Bragg, N.C. and served as the CENTCOM chief of staff from August 2018 to September 2019.

The event, officiated by Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III, brought together senior defense leaders from around the world, CENTCOM’s component commanders, elected officials and other distinguished visitors.

“U.S. Central Command will continue to thrive under the steadfast leadership of General Kurilla during a critical time in a region that remains dangerous and complex,” said Austin, who himself commanded CENTCOM from March 2013 to April 2016.

“I’m honored to serve alongside the soldiers, sailors, airmen, guardians, marines, coastguardsmen and civilians of this command,” said Kurilla.

CENTCOM comprises more than 44,000 service and family members overseas and nearly 5,000 personnel assigned and attached to the headquarters at MacDill Air Force Base, Fla.

Gen. McKenzie assumed command of CENTCOM in March 2019. During his tenure, McKenzie led high-profile missions including the elimination of terrorist leaders Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and Qassem Soleimani, the U.S. military’s withdrawal from Afghanistan and subsequent mission to transport more than 124,000 Americans and Afghan evacuees, and the transition of coalition forces in Iraq from a combat to an advise, assist, and enable role in support of Iraqi forces.

“For the past 21 years, CENTCOM has been the only combatant command in close and enduring contact with America’s enemies,” said McKenzie, who will retire after 42 years of military service. “It’s where every combat arms commander wants to be.”

“I can think of no one better qualified to write CENTCOM’s next chapter than Erik Kurilla,” said McKenzie.

Kurilla will oversee all U.S. military missions throughout the 21-country area of responsibility in the Middle East, Levant, and Central Asia, as well as leading the 78-nation campaign against ISIS.

Retirement Ceremony Honors CENTCOM Commander

-30-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001040257
<NAME> NEW ZMAX CORP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       4,625,988
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,498,637
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    134,493
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,253,925
<PP&E>                                         344,179
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,834
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,019,368
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,888,714
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,729
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,118,925
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,019,368
<SALES>                                      2,502,779
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,502,779
<CGS>                                          843,015
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  843,015
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (3,987)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (8,845)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                234,005
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            234,005
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   234,005
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>
## ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION II No. CV

- 13

- 933

AMANDA BORDER
APPELLANT
V.
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and MINOR CHILD
APP ELLEE S Opinion Delivered February 12, 2014
APPEAL FROM THE GREENE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. JV

- 2012

- 81 ]

HONORABLE BARBARA HALSEY, JUDGE

AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED
RHONDA K. WOOD , Judge
This is a no -merit appeal from an order terminating the parental rights of appellant
Amanda Bo rder to her child, B.B. Border’ s attorney has filed a motion to withdraw as
counsel and a no

- merit brief pursuant to Linker

- Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human
Services , 359 Ark. 131, 194 S.W.3d 739 (2004), and Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 6 -9(i) (2012), asserting that there are no issues of arguable merit to support the appeal. The brief includes a discussion of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the termination order , all matters in the record that might arguably support an appeal, all adverse rulings, and a statement as to why counsel considers each point raised as incapable of supporting a meritorious appeal. The clerk of this court sent a copy of the brief and motion to Border,2 advising her that she had the right to file pro se points for reversal. Border did not respond.
After careful review of the record in accordance with Rule 6

- 9(i) of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, we hold that th is appeal lack s merit. Counsel complied with our requirements for no

- merit termination cases, and we affirm by memorandum opinion. In Re Memorandum Opinions , 16 Ark. App. 301, 700 S.W.2d 63 (1985); Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 5- 2(e). Affirmed; motion to withdraw as counsel granted.
G LADWIN , C.J., and B ROWN , J., agree. Deborah R. Sallings , Arkansas Public Defender Commission, for appellant. No response.
-----Original Message----- 

From: kyle_tara@suddenlink.net [mailto:kyle_tara@suddenlink.net] 

Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 10:54 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: lifetime income RFI 

This is a HORRIBLE plan. Do not implement this!!!