alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CENTCOM leaders visit Saudi Royal Armed Forces

/ Published July 22, 2022

Jul. 22, 2022

Release Number 20220722-02

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla. -** Gen. Michael “Erik” Kurilla, commander of U.S. Central Command, along with Vice Adm. Charles “Brad” Cooper, commander of U.S. Navy Central, and Lt. Gen. Pat Frank, commander of U.S. Army Central, visited the Saudi Royal Armed Forces in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia July 20-21.                 TAMPA, Fla. – Gen. Michael “Erik” Kurilla, commander of U.S. Central Command, along with Vice Adm. Charles “Brad” Cooper, commander of U.S. Navy Central, and Lt. Gen. Pat Frank, commander of U.S. Army Central, visited the Saudi Royal Armed Forces in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia July 20-21.                            CENTCOM leaders visit Saudi Royal Armed Forces                            TAMPA, Fla. – Gen. Michael “Erik” Kurilla, commander of U.S. Central Command, along with Vice Adm. Charles “Brad” Cooper, commander of U.S. Navy Central, and Lt. Gen. Pat Frank, commander of U.S. Army Central, visited the Saudi Royal Armed Forces in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia July 20-21.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Courtesy PhotoVIRIN: 220722-M-LM779-001

The visit is part of an ongoing multi-country trip to the CENTCOM area of responsibility. 

The Saudi Royal Armed Forces, who have had a codified security cooperation with the United States since 1951 and fought alongside the U.S. military during Operation Desert Storm, is a critical partner in the Middle East. This visit, the second by Gen. Kurilla to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and fifth to the region since taking command of CENTCOM in April, underscores the importance of that partnership.

While in Saudi Arabia, Gen. Kurilla engaged with Chief of General Staff, Gen. Fayyadh al-Ruwaili and other Saudi senior military leaders.

The leaders discussed matters of importance to both militaries and to the region, including opportunities to strengthen regional cooperation across an expanded network of security partners and ways to enhance security through employment of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning technology.

Gen. Kurilla visited multiple military sites including port operations along the Red Sea and a

Saudi Patriot battery defending Jeddah from missiles, rockets, and unmanned aerial systems. The Patriot crew members relayed their experience from multiple intercepts of Houthi attacks.

The American and Saudi military leaders also visited the US-Saudi Combined Expeditionary – Robotics Operations Center (CE-ROC) where they discussed cutting-edge maritime initiatives involving Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and unmanned surface and undersea vessels.

“The Saudis are all-in on partnering for innovation,” said Kurilla. “They understand the technology, the application of that technology, and they are leaning forward on its implementation. The Kingdom is poised for the future, and I look forward to a continued military partnership.”

-30-
H. Res. 388

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 17, 2002.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 476) to amend title

18, United States Code, to prohibit taking minors across

State lines in circumvention of laws requiring the involvement

of parents in abortion decisions. The bill shall be considered

as read for amendment. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) two hours of debate on the bill

equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking

minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; and (2)

one motion to recommit.

Attest:

Clerk.
From: Eugene Heil [mailto:gene.heil@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 4:28 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

Leave my 401k ALONE. Is it not enough that we are already taxed and regulated into 

the ground? Must you have the last say-so on everything that is already mine? What 

group of voters will you buy with the proceeds? What sham project will you "fund" with 

that which you confiscate? I am quite happy to manage both the risk and reward in my 

401k without your regulatory intervention. I own it, not you and your parasitic minions 

in government. 

Please go away. 

Eugene Heil
#### Ella A. Wheeler, Respondent, v. Alfred Wilkinson and another, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Jan. 23: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL in Syria and Iraq
 By CJTF - Operation Inherent Resolve News Release
  January 23, 2015 Release # 2015023FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **SOUTHWEST ASIA -** On Jan. 22, U.S. and Coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria, using attack, bomber, and fighter aircraft to conduct 12 airstrikes. Separately, U.S. and Coalition military forces conducted 13 airstrikes in Iraq, using attack, bomber, and fighter aircraft against ISIL terrorists. All strikes took place between 8 a.m., Jan. 22, and 8 a.m., Jan. 23, local time. The following is a summary of the strikes conducted since the last press release: **Syria***  Near Kobani, 10 airstrikes struck six ISIL tactical units and a large ISIL unit and destroyed 12 ISIL fighting positions and an ISIL vehicle.*  Near Ar Raqqah, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL trailer.*  Near Al Hasakah, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL mobile oil drilling rig. **Iraq***  Near Al Asad*, three airstrikes struck two ISIL tactical units, a large ISIL unit, and an ISIL vehicle, and destroyed an ISIL IED and two ISIL vehicles.*  Near Mosul, eight airstrikes struck three ISIL tactical units and a large ISIL unit and destroyed seven ISIL vehicles, two ISIL VBIEDs, an ISIL bulldozer, four ISIL buildings, an ISIL artillery system, an ISIL heavy weapon system, two ISIL armored vehicles, an ISIL shipping container, and an ISIL bunker.*  Near Sinjar, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL building.*  Near Tal Afar, an airstrike struck a large ISIL unit and destroyed an ISIL building and an ISIL vehicle. Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely. The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria, the region, and the wider international community. The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations conducting airstrikes in Iraq include the U.S., Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. Coalition nations conducting airstrikes in Syria include the U.S., Bahrain, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.
#### § 568.2 Application.

This part applies to incomplete vehicle manufacturers, intermediate manufacturers, and final-stage manufacturers of vehicles manufactured in two or more stages.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 214 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 64
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 214

                          [Report No. 107-172]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2505) to amend title 18, 
             United States Code, to prohibit human cloning.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 2001

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2505) to amend title 18, 
             United States Code, to prohibit human cloning.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 2505) to amend title 18, United States Code, to 
prohibit human cloning. The bill shall be considered as read for 
amendment. The amendments recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary 
now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on 
any further amendment thereto to final passage without intervening 
motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, as amended, equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on the Judiciary; (2) the further amendment printed in 
the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if 
offered by Representative Scott of Virginia or his designee, which 
shall be separately debatable for 10 minutes equally divided and 
controlled by the proponent and an opponent; (3) after disposition of 
the amendment by Representative Scott, the further amendment in the 
nature of a substitute printed in the report of the Committee on Rules, 
if offered by Representative Greenwood of Pennsylvania or his designee, 
shall be in order without intervention of any point of order, shall be 
considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for one hour 
equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and 
(4) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

                                                  House Calendar No. 64

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 214

                          [Report No. 107-172]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2505) to amend title 18, 
             United States Code, to prohibit human cloning.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 30, 2001

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Editorial Note on Part 587
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 587 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 587.19 Mounting. ( a ) The deformable face is rigidly attached to the edge of the fixed rigid barrier or to some rigid structure attached thereto. The front of the fixed rigid barrier to which the deformable face is attached is flat (continuous over the height and width of the face and vertical ±1 degree and perpendicular ±1 degree to the axis of the run-up track). The edge of the deformable face is aligned with the edge of the fixed rigid barrier appropriate for the side of the vehicle to be tested.
( b ) The deformable face is attached to the fixed rigid barrier by means of ten bolts, five in the top mounting flange and five in the bottom, such that the bottom of the bumper element honeycomb is 200 mm (7.8 in) ±15 mm (0.6 in) from the ground. These bolts are at least 8 mm (0.3 in) in diameter. Steel clamping strips are used for both the top and bottom mounting flanges (Figure 1). These strips are 60 mm (2.4 in) high and 1000 mm (39.4 in) wide and have thickness of at least 3 mm (0.12 in). Five clearance holes of 20 mm (0.8 in) diameter are drilled in both strips to correspond with those in the mounting flange on the deformable face cladding sheet (see § 586.17(c)).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

MICHAEL J. WILLIAMS,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 229 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of September, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, DC  20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

[ X ] Annual report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (*Fee Required*)

For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2000 or

[    ] Transition report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (*No Fee Required*)

For the transition period from _________ to ___________

 

Commission file number 0-12619
 

                                                         Collins Industries, Inc.                                                         .
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

               Missouri                                                                       43-0985160                               .

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)				           (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

 

             15 Compound Drive                      Hutchinson, Kansas                         67502-4349         .
               (Address of principal executive offices)						                 (Zip Code)
 

Registrant's telephone number including area code	                              316-663-5551                                        .
 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

		Title of each class				             Name of each exchange on which registered

 

                            None                             .		                             N/A                                 ..
 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

 

                                              Common Stock, Par Value $.10 per share                                        .
(Title of class)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorterperiod that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

 

					Yes  X .	   No .
 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy ofinformation statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  (  )

 

The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $  17,671,260  as of
#### Hedden Construction Company, Respondent, *v.*The Rossiter Realty Company, Appellant.

*Hedden Construction Co,*v. *Rossiter Realty Co.,*136 App. Div. 601, affirmed.

(Argued March 29, 1911;

decided April 25, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 11, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for extra work alleged to have been performed in connection with a building contract.

*William H. Harris*for appellant.

*Frederick Hulse*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Haight. Vann,. Willard Bartlett, Chase and Collin, JJ.
# Iraqi Forces Launch Offensive to Liberate Final Daesh Stronghold in Iraq

/ Published Oct. 26, 2017
October 26, 2017Release # 20171026-02FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**SOUTHWEST ASIA -** The Coalition welcomes the commencement of the Iraqi Security Forces' offensive to liberate Al Qaim district from Daesh Oct. 26.Al Qaim is Daesh’s final stronghold in Iraq and approximately 1,500 Daesh fighters are estimated to remain in the immediate vicinity.The Iraqi Security Forces are battle-hardened after their victories in Mosul, Tal Afar and Hawijah. The ISF is a determined, professional force dedicated to ridding Iraq of Daesh.The Coalition provides the ISF with training, equipment, advice, assistance, intelligence and precise air support. The Coalition will continue to support the Government of Iraq as we recognize together the importance of a unified Iraq to the long-term security and prosperity of the Iraqi people.Rigorous Coalition standards and extraordinary measures in the targeting process seek to protect non-combatants, in accordance with the Law of Armed Conflict and the principles of military necessity, humanity, proportionality and distinction.Al Qaim sits in the Middle Euphrates River Valley on the Syrian border, where it connects with the Syrian town of Abu Kamal. Prior to Daesh’s control of the city, Al Qaim District’s population was around 150,000. We anticipate a significant return of residents to the district upon Iraq’s liberation of Al Qaim.The Government of Iraq and the ISF, with the support of the Global Coalition, have liberated more than 4.4 million Iraqis and reclaimed over 47,769 square kilometers, approximately 95% of land once held by Daesh. Much work remains to consolidate gains as operations continue to destroy Daesh’s remaining capabilities.-30-
§ 601.42 Emergency relief docket. ( a ) By January 31st of each year, FTA shall establish an Emergency Relief Docket in the publicly accessible DOT Docket Management System (DMS) (*http://dms.dot.gov*).
( b ) FTA shall publish a notice in the Federal Register identifying, by docket number, the Emergency Relief Docket for that calendar year. A notice shall also be published in the previous year's Emergency Relief Docket identifying the new docket number.
( c ) If the Administrator, or his/her designee, determines that an emergency event has occurred, or in anticipation of such an event, FTA shall place a message on its web page (*http://www.fta.dot.gov*) indicating the Emergency Relief Docket has been opened and including the docket number.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the related
Form 10-K financial statements for The Toledo Edison Company and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements. (Amounts in 1,000's).
Income tax expense includes $6,538,000 related to other income.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000352049
<NAME> THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,168,216
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    417,167
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         243,948
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       939,434
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,768,765
<COMMON>                                       195,670
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      328,559
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             51,463
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 575,692
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    210,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,083,666
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  104,200
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                        1,690
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                24,536
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 768,981
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,768,765
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      957,037
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            72,696
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     710,618
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     776,776
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        180,261
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              12,225
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 192,486
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        85,904
<NET-INCOME>                                   106,582
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     13,610
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   92,972
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        50,483
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       85,606
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         262,430
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 801

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 801 appear at 86 FR 54641, Oct. 4, 2021.

#### § 801.40 NTSB rules.

The NTSB's rules are published in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 49, Chapter VIII.
§ 604.30 Filing complaints. ( a ) *Filing address.* Unless provided otherwise, the complainant shall file the complaint with the Office of the Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., Room E55-302, Washington, DC 20590 and file it electronically in the Charter Service Complaint docket number FTA-2007-0025 at *http://www.regulations.gov* or mail it to the docket by sending the complaint to 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
( b ) *Date and method of filing.* Filing of any document shall be by personal delivery, U.S. mail, or overnight delivery with receipt confirmation. Unless the date is shown to be inaccurate, documents to be filed with FTA shall be deemed filed, on the earliest of: ( 1 ) The date of personal delivery;
( 2 ) The mailing date shown on the certificate of service;
( 3 ) The date shown on the postmark if there is no certificate of service; or
( 4 ) The mailing date shown by other evidence if there is no certificate of service and no postmark.
( c ) *E-mail or fax.* A document sent by facsimile or e-mail shall not constitute service as described in § 604.31.
( d ) *Number of copies.* Unless otherwise specified, an executed original shall be filed with FTA.
( e ) *Form.* Documents filed with FTA shall be typewritten or legibly printed. In the case of docketed proceedings, the document shall include a title and the docket number, as established by the Chief Counsel or Presiding Official, of the proceeding on the front page.
( f ) *Signing of documents and other papers.* The original of every document filed shall be signed by the person filing it or the person's duly authorized representative. Subject to the enforcement provisions contained in this subpart, the signature shall serve as a certification that the signer has read the document and, based on reasonable inquiry, to the best of the signer's knowledge, information, and belief, the document is: ( 1 ) Consistent with this part;
( 2 ) Warranted by existing law or that a good faith argument exists for extension, modification, or reversal of existing law; and
( 3 ) Not interposed for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of the administrative process.