alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Data & Analysis

MPA Inventory

Ocean Uses Atlas

De Facto MPAs

Analysis of U.S. MPAs

Maps

The Marine Protected Areas Inventory

 > Data & Analysis > MPA Inventory

The Marine Protected Areas Inventory (MPA Inventory) is a comprehensive

and classify marine protected areas within US waters. The Inventory contains inf

the only such comprehensive dataset in the nation. The database has various ap

and conservation, but its primary purpose is to maintain baseline information on 

development of the National System of MPAs, as defined in Executive Order 131

used for regulatory purposes; please consult the Federal Register for the official

developed with extensive input from state and federal MPA programs and drawn 

The data and products derived from the Inventory are served in various formats a

MPA Center is continually updating and verifying the Inventory data, so please

information, existing site clarifications or updated spatial boundary data.

The data and products derived from the Inventory are served in various

Interactive Mapping Tool

This NEW application provides online access to the MPA Inventory data 

environment. This tool can be used to view the MPA Inventory sites and 

by specific conservation attributes or to search and view sites by region

MPA Mapping Tool. (First time users, please expect a oneTabular Data

The tabular data are current through January 2010 and include classific

sites in the MPA Inventory. These data are served in excel spreadsheet 

compliant metadata describing the data fields and classification attribute

the tabular data.

GIS Spatial Data

The GIS data for the MPA Inventory are current through January 2010 a

~1,450 sites in the MPA Inventory for which GIS data are available.

[zip, 90MB] and ESRI geodatabase [zip, 41.6MB] formats with FGDC 

describing the data fields and classification attributes.

Maps

Follow this link to explore various maps and analytical products that ha

MPA Inventory data.

Documents

National Marine Protected Areas Center: The Marine Protected Areas Inventory Page 1 of 2

http://www.mpa.gov/dataanalysis/mpainventory/ 3/7/2011
If you would like to propose the addition of an MPA to the MPA Inventory, please 

to the MPA Inventory team.

 MPA Inventory ‒ New Site Form

For more information, contact:

Mimi D'Iorio

GIS Manager

Mimi.Diorio@noaa.gov

See links below for background documents and related resources for th

 Coastal and Ocean Management and Use Databases for Dive

 Snapshot of United States MPAs

About This Site | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Site Map | Contact

Revised October 21, 2010 | Site jointly managed by the U.S. Department of Commerce / NOAA and the

Web Site Owner: National Ocean Service

National Marine Protected Areas Center: The Marine Protected Areas Inventory Page 2 of 2

http://www.mpa.gov/dataanalysis/mpainventory/ 3/7/2011
§ 661.5 General requirements. ( a ) Except as provided in § 661.7 and § 661.11 of this part, no funds may be obligated by FTA for a grantee project unless all iron, steel, and manufactured products used in the project are produced in the United States.
( b ) All steel and iron manufacturing processes must take place in the United States, except metallurgical processes involving refinement of steel additives.
( c ) The steel and iron requirements apply to all construction materials made primarily of steel or iron and used in infrastructure projects such as transit or maintenance facilities, rail lines, and bridges. These items include, but are not limited to, structural steel or iron, steel or iron beams and columns, running rail and contact rail. These requirements do not apply to steel or iron used as components or subcomponents of other manufactured products or rolling stock, or to bimetallic power rail incorporating steel or iron components.
( d ) For a manufactured product to be considered produced in the United States: ( 1 ) All of the manufacturing processes for the product must take place in the United States; and
( 2 ) All of the components of the product must be of U.S. origin. A component is considered of U.S. origin if it is manufactured in the United States, regardless of the origin of its subcomponents.
[61 FR 6302, Feb. 16, 1996, as amended at 74 FR 30239, June 25, 2009]
### Recent Similar Granted 333 Exemptions

 Exemption No. 15151 Aerial photography and videography for crop surveying,

inspections and other flight operations.

 Exemption No. 15140 DJI Inspire 1, Phantom 3

 Exemption No. 14901 Aerial surveying, imaging, and inspections

 Exemption No. 14301 Precision agriculture, aerial mapping and imaging, utility pipeline

and powerline inspection.

 Exemption No. 13926 Aerial photography and videography for real estate , Blade

Chroma
# Official Journal L 262/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 262 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6422 July 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 262

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6422 July 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1202 of 20 July 2021 concerning certain emergency measures relating to African swine fever in Estonia
  (notified under document C(2021) 5559)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1202 of 20 July 2021 concerning certain emergency measures relating to African swine fever in Estonia
  (notified under document C(2021) 5559)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2021) 5559)

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 30, 2024

NO. 03

- 24

- 00105

- CR

William Jason Perez , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY
BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND KELLY
AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction

. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs

is made.
# October 27: Military airstrikes continue against ISIS terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published Oct. 27, 2017
Oct. 27, 2017Release # 20171027-01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**SOUTHWEST ASIA –** On Oct. 26, Coalition military forces conducted 10 strikes consisting of 18 engagements against ISIS terrorists in Syria and Iraq.In Syria, Coalition military forces conducted six strikes consisting of eight engagements against ISIS targets.•       Near Abu Kamal, one strike engaged an ISIS tactical unit and destroyed an ISIS vehicle.•       Near Dayr Az Zawr, five strikes engaged three ISIS tactical units and destroyed a VBIED factory, three ISIS defensive fighting positions, a tactical vehicle, an ISIS headquarters and a fighting position.In Iraq, Coalition military forces conducted four strikes consisting of 10 engagements against ISIS targets.•       Near Al Qaim, two strikes engaged an ISIS tactical unit and destroyed a command and control node, two weapons caches, a VBIED headquarters and two VBIED factories.•       Near Rawah, two strikes destroyed three ISIS supply routes and damaged a supply route.Additionally, one strike consisting of one engagement was conducted in Iraq on Oct. 17.•       Near Al Qaim, one strike destroyed an ISIS-held building and an ISIS base.These strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to destroy ISIS in Iraq and Syria.  The destruction of ISIS targets in Iraq and Syria also further limits the group’s ability to project terror and conduct external operations throughout the region and the rest of the world.This Coalition strike release contains all strikes conducted by fighter, attack, bomber, rotary-wing, or remotely piloted aircraft, rocket propelled artillery and ground-based tactical artillery.A strike, as defined in the Coalition release, refers to one or more kinetic engagements that occur in roughly the same geographic location to produce a single, sometimes cumulative effect in that location.  For example, a single aircraft delivering a single  weapon against a lone ISIS vehicle is one strike, but so is multiple aircraft delivering  dozens of weapons against a group of ISIS-held buildings and weapon systems in a compound, having the cumulative effect of making that facility harder or impossible to use. Strike assessments are based on initial reports and may be refined.CJTF-OIR does not report the number or type of aircraft employed in a strike, the number of munitions dropped in each strike, or the number of individual munition impact points against a target. The information used to compile the daily strike releases is based on 'Z' or Greenwich Mean Time.-30-
§ 625.31 Implementation deadline. ( a ) A provider's initial TAM plan must be completed no later than two years after October 1, 2016.
( b ) A provider may submit in writing to FTA a request to extend the implementation deadline. FTA must receive an extension request before the implementation deadline and will consider all requests on a case-by-case basis.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0723 IN THE MATTER OF: W.J.B., Respondent and Appellant. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 3 1 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 24 2023

04/24/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0723
§ 32.605 Award. *Award* means an award of financial assistance by the Department of Transportation or other Federal agency directly to a recipient. ( a ) The term award includes: ( 1 ) A Federal grant or cooperative agreement, in the form of money or property in lieu of money.
( 2 ) A block grant or a grant in an entitlement program, whether or not the grant is exempted from coverage under the Governmentwide rule 49 CFR part 18 that implements OMB Circular A-102 (for availability, see 5 CFR 1310.3) and specifies uniform administrative requirements.
( b ) The term award does not include: ( 1 ) Technical assistance that provides services instead of money.
( 2 ) Loans.
( 3 ) Loan guarantees.
( 4 ) Interest subsidies.
( 5 ) Insurance.
( 6 ) Direct appropriations.
( 7 ) Veterans' benefits to individuals (*i.e.,* any benefit to veterans, their families, or survivors by virtue of the service of a veteran in the Armed Forces of the United States).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,026
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,324
<ALLOWANCES>                                       923
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,456
<PP&E>                                           4,296
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,326
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,066
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,561
<BONDS>                                          2,253
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            38
<OTHER-SE>                                      (4,952)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,066
<SALES>                                         39,029
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,029
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,563
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (228)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,641
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 281
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,228)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (146)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,082)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (1,032)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    120
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,049)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (1.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.14)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CompuDyne Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 accompanying this certification
and filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Geoffrey F. Feidelberg,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify, to the best of my knowledge,  pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: March 31, 2005

                                            /s/ Geoffrey F. Feidelberg
                                            --------------------------
                                            Geoffrey F. Feidelberg
                                            Chief Financial Officer
From: Dale Potter [mailto:dpotter@premiercomputing.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 6:45 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule

To whom it may concern:

I am writing to express my objection to the proposed rule change providing that companies

providing private valuations for ESOP concerns be fiduciaries to the ESOP.

Our concern is that the valuation be conducted by an independent firm with no commitment

other than to provide an independent valuation for the parties in interest to consider.  We are a

small privately held firm adopting an ESOP approximately four years ago.  The ESOP has helped

to provide an ownership interest to our employees thereby allowing them to further provide for

their retirement as well as providing an opportunity to create personal wealth.  The ESOP breaks

the concentration of ownership and encourages employees to work toward their collective best

interests. The alternative for existing owners is to sell to another entity which would likely act

contrary to the best interest of our employees and is unlikely to provide equity participation to

all employees as an ESOP does.  

The proposed rule will needlessly increase the cost of liability insurance for our valuation

provider who in turn will pass the costs on thereby reducing the amount available to ESOP

participants and to what avail?  We prefer that the valuation firm be fiercely independent

focusing solely on a justifiable valuation.  Making them a fiduciary for the ESOP places them in

an adversarial role and will interfere with an orderly transfer of ownership to our employees.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Dale Potter  

    

 

Dale Potter, President 

801-487-1717; mobile 801-414-3436

dpotter@premiercomputing.com

www.premiercomputing.com

www.halftimeu.com (training information)

Help Desk (801) 487-8400 or 1-(800) 458-2948 

Request online technical support at our web site: www.premiercomputing.com/support.

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(s) to which 

it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure 

under law, further this message may be subject to public disclosure rules. If the reader of this message is not the 

intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you 

are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If 

you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message 

from your computer. Thank you
###### Editorial Note on Part 451

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 451 appear at 74 FR 49241, Sept. 25, 2009, and at 77 FR 59790, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 451.14 Alternative approval of new containers by design type.

(a) New containers manufactured before June 16, 1978 without being approved under the preceding section may be approved by submission to an approval authority of an application corresponding to that required under § 451.1(b) for existing containers. All new containers so approved must have safety approval plates affixed and receive their first periodic examination in accordance with the procedures prescribed in § 452.3 by January 1, 1985.

[47 FR 50496, Nov. 8, 1982]
§ 7.41 When and how are processing fees imposed for records that are made available under subpart B or processed under subpart C of this part? ( a ) DOT imposes fees for services that DOT performs for the public under subparts B and C of this part. Fees apply to all required and special services performed by DOT employees, including employees of non-appropriated fund activities, and contractors, if utilized.
( b ) DOT may assess a fee for time spent searching for records requested under subpart C even if the search fails to locate records or the records located are determined to be exempt from disclosure. In addition, if records are requested for commercial use, DOT may assess a fee for time spent reviewing any responsive records located to determine whether they are exempt from disclosure.
( c ) When a request is made under subpart C by a first-party requester and DOT processes the request under both FOIA and the Privacy Act, DOT determines the fees for records in DOT Privacy Act systems of record in accordance with the Privacy Act (as implemented by DOT regulations at 49 CFR part 10) rather than the FOIA.
( d ) When DOT aggregates requests made under subpart C (see § 7.34(d)), DOT apportions fees as set forth in § 7.43(b).
( e ) As a special service, DOT may certify copies of records made available under subpart B or released under subpart C, upon request and payment of the applicable fee: with the DOT seal (where authorized)—US $10; or true copy, without seal—US $5. Certified copies can be requested by contacting the applicable FOIA Requester Service Center (see § 7.27) or the DOT Dockets Office identified in § 7.12(b)(1).
( f ) DOT makes transcripts of hearings or oral arguments available for inspection only. If transcripts are prepared by a nongovernmental contractor and the contract permits DOT to handle the reproduction of further copies, DOT assesses duplication fees as set forth in § 7.42(d). If the contract for transcription services reserves the sales privilege to the reporting service, any duplicate copies must be purchased directly from the reporting service.
( g ) In the interest of making documents of general interest publicly available at as low a cost as possible, DOT arranges alternative sources whenever possible. In appropriate instances, material that is published and offered for sale may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-0001; U.S. Department of Commerce's National Technical Information Service (NTIS), Springfield, VA 22151; or National Audio-Visual Center, National Archives and Records Administration, Capital Heights, MD 20743-3701.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 4.21

                        ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND CONFIRMATION

TO:  James E.H. Darby
     550 Lowry Lane
     North Vancouver, British Columbia, V7G 1R3

     (the "Lender")

The undersigned refers to:

1.      the loan consolidation agreement made effective as of the 1st day of
        October, 2003 (as amended, renewed or replaced from time to time the
        "Loan Agreement") between the Lender and Consolidated Envirowaste
        Industries Inc. (the "Borrower");

2.      the general security agreement dated August 30, 1999 ("GSA") granted by
        the undersigned in favour of the Lender; and

3.      the guarantee and postponement of claim dated February 10, 2004 (the
        "Guarantee") executed and delivered by the undersigned to the Lender,
        with respect to the debts and liabilities of the Borrower to the Lender
        under or pursuant to the Loan Agreement.

In consideration of the Lender entering into the Loan Agreement with the
Borrower the undersigned hereby acknowledges, agrees and confirms to the Lender
that the GSA is also delivered to the Lender and held by the Lender as
collateral security for the obligations of the undersigned to the Lender under
the Guarantee.

Dated this 10th day of February, 2004.

THE ANSWER GARDEN PRODUCTS LTD.

Per: "Doug Halward"
      -------------------------
      Authorized Signatory
IV

House Calendar No. 148

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 404

[Report No. 107–427]

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 1, 2002

Mr. DIAZ-BALART, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

1 Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on

2 the legislative day of Thursday, May 2, 2002, for the

3 Speaker to entertain a motion that the House suspend the

4 rules relating to the resolution (H. Res. 392) expressing

5 solidarity with Israel in its fight against terrorism. If the

6 Speaker entertains such motion, debate under clause 1(c)

7 of rule XV shall be extended to one hour.
House Calendar No. 148

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 404

[Report No. 107–427]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend

the rules.

MAY 1, 2002

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
Docket: EBSA-2010-0007 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in 

Retirement Plans 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0007-0001 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options 

Document: EBSA-2010-0007-DRAFT-0060 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: James Keene 

Address: 

JC, KS, 

Organization: na 

General Comment 

Leave my IRA alone. I don't want any more government intrusion into my retirement income. 

Leave my 401K alone. It is my money not the government's. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: March 29, 2010 

Received: March 28, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80acb49a 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=Print&PrintId=0900006480acb4... 3/29/2010