alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Strafford,

Dec., 1894.

#### Downing *v.*Farmington.

A non-resident payer of taxes on personal property may appeal from the selectmen’s refusal to abate his tax at any time within nine months after he has received actual notice of the tax.

Petition, filed January 12, 1894, for the abatement of a tax assessed in Farmington against the plaintiff’, April 1, 1892, upon his stock in the Farmington National Bank. Facts found by the court. The plaintiff'was a resident of Haverhill, Massachusetts. In July or August, 1892, the collector of taxes of Farmington sent a bill of the tax, by mail, addressed to the plaintiff at Haverhill, which ho did not receive. He first learned of the tax in August, 1898. If the sending of the bill was sufficient notice of the tax, the petition is to be dismissed; otherwise the. tax is to be abated.

*Robert G. Pike,*for the plaintiff.

*George B. Cochrane,*for the defendants.

Chase, J.

An appeal may be taken from the selectmen’s refusal or neglect to abate a tax at any time within nine months after notice of the tax. P. S., *c.*59, *s.*11; *Larkin*v. Portsmouth, *18859 N. H. 26; *Farmington*v. *Downing,*67 N. H. 441. The manner of giving notice to a non-resident of a tax assessed upon his personal property is not prescribed in the statutes. Non-residents are expressly excepted from the operation of P. S., c. 60, *s.*2; and section 2 of chapter 61 relates to taxes assessed upon real estate. The statute “ does not require the person taxed to appeal within a particular time from the assessment of the tax; but it allows him to appeal within nine months after he has had notice of the tax, — and that might be years after the assessment.” *Trust & Guaranty Co.*v. *Portsmouth,*59 N. H. 33, 34. It contemplates actual notice. Whether the notice must be in writing or may be given orally *(Gordon*v. *Clifford,*28 N. H. 402, 413) is a question that need not be considered because it is found that the plaintiff had no notice, written or oral, until August, 1893. The mailing of a bill of the tax to the plaintiff might justify au inference that he received it and became informed of its contents, in the absence of proof to the contrary *(Sabre*v. *Smith,*62 N. H. 663, 665); but it being shown that he did not receive it, there is no room for inference.

According to the provisions of the case, the tax must be abated.

*Tax abated.*

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
# Coalition forces kill ISIS financial facilitator

/ Published June 23, 2017
June 23, 2017Release #20170623-02FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:**SOUTHWEST ASIA —**Coalition forces killed a key ISIS financial facilitator with an airstrike in Abu Kamal, Syria, June 16.Fawaz Muhammad Jubayr al-Rawi, a Syrian native and an experienced terrorist financial facilitator, moved millions of dollars for the terror organization's attack and logistics network. He owned the Hanifa Currency Exchange in Abu-Kamal, which he used along with a network of global financial contacts to move money into and out of ISIS-controlled territory and across borders on behalf of the group.The U.S. Department of the Treasury, pursuant to U.S. Executive Order 13224, which targets terrorists and those providing support to terrorists or acts of terrorism, imposed sanctions on al-Rawi and his company, Hanifa Currency Exchange's branch in Abu-Kamal, Dec. 13, 2016. This was the first U.S. action specifically targeting ISIS-affiliated money-services businesses.The U.S. Department of Treasury designated al-Rawi for providing financial and material support to ISIS. Al-Rawi pledged loyalty to ISIS in 2014 and used his network of global financial contacts to help ISIS conduct weapons and ammunition deals at a time when the terrorist group was seizing land and committing atrocities across Syria and Iraq. In 2015, he facilitated ISIS financial transactions and money storage, including payments to ISIS foreign terrorist fighters; his property was also used by senior ISIS leaders for weekly meetings. As of May 2016, he was considered an ISIS finance emir, whose money exchange business was used for ISIS-related transactions.The Coalition's efforts to disrupt and attack ISIS's financial networks have restricted the terror group's ability to move resources and export terrorism. Several of al-Rawi's close terrorist associates have also been targeted and killed by the Coalition:-  Samir Idris, a key ISIS financial facilitator for external terror attacks and an international money launderer, was killed June 7, 2017, near Mayadin, Syria. He was trusted by senior ISIS leadership to move funds across borders to pay for external terror attacks.-  Abdurakhmon Uzbeki, a foreign fighter and external terror attack facilitator, was killed April 6, 2017, near Mayadin, Syria. He was a close associate of ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and helped facilitate the high profile attack which murdered 39 people on New Year's Eve at the Reina night club in Istanbul. U.S. Central Command announced his death on April 21, 2017.-  Abd al-Basit al-Iraqi, a senior external terror attack facilitator, was killed Nov. 12, 2016, in Raqqa, Syria. He was responsible for attacks across the Middle East, including against American, Turkish, and other European targets of interest, and was also involved in assassination plots, hostage situations, convoy reconnaissance, and helped arm, fund and move terrorist fighters. U.S. Central Command announced his death Jan. 6, 2017.-30-
1210-AB32-2-1223.html[7/24/2015 8:47:42 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvs-6wp3

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1718

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

Organization: teaparty patriots

General Comment

I have one word to say " DICTATORSHIP ! " . The states ,people,congress & I didn`t vote on this ! Where`s our

 say in the matter. I`m sick & tired of our Supreme elitest leader & his cronies,shoving what he/they think best

 down our throats anytime it chooses. This isn`t about fiduciary,we already have laws on that.Big Brother,just

 wants us to know,he`s looking out for us,by taking one more tiny piece of our freedom away.I say NO WAY to

 PEREZ,I don`t TRUST YOU !
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Heritage  Worldwide,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



Date:  November 14, 2004                     /s/ Claude Couty
                                             --------------------
                                             Claude Couty
                                             Chief Financial Officer and
                                             General Manager
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/John W. Sammon                                   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|
| John W. Sammon                                      |
| Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive Officer |
| May 10, 2010                                        |
|                                                |
| /s/Ronald J. Casciano                               |
| Ronald J. Casciano                                  |
| Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, |
| and Chief Accounting Officer                        |
| May 10, 2010                                        |
|                                                |
Editorial Note on Part 572
Editorial Notes: 1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 572.172 Head assembly and test procedure. ( a ) The head assembly for this test consists of the complete head (drawing 420-1000), a six-axis neck transducer (drawing SA572-S11, included in drawing 420-0000), or its structural replacement (drawing 420-383X), and 3 accelerometers (drawing SA572-S4, included in drawing 420-0000) (all incorporated by reference, see § 572.170).
( b ) When the head assembly is dropped from a height of 376.0 ±1.0 mm (14.8 ±0.04 in) in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section, the peak resultant acceleration at the location of the accelerometers at the head CG may not be less than 250 G or more than 300 G. The resultant acceleration vs. time history curve shall be unimodal; oscillations occurring after the main pulse must be less than 10 percent of the peak resultant acceleration. The lateral acceleration shall not exceed 15 G (zero to peak).
( c ) Head test procedure. The test procedure for the head is as follows: ( 1 ) Soak the head assembly in a controlled environment at any temperature between 18.9 and 25.6 °C (66 and 78 °F) and a relative humidity from 10 to 70 percent for at least four hours prior to a test.
( 2 ) Prior to the test, clean the impact surface of the skin and the impact plate surface with isopropyl alcohol, trichloroethane, or an equivalent. The skin of the head must be clean and dry for testing.
( 3 ) Suspend and orient the head assembly as shown in Figure T1. The lowest point on the forehead must be 376.0 ±1.0 mm (14.8 ±0.04 in) from the impact surface. The 1.57 mm (0.062 in) diameter holes located on either side of the dummy's head shall be used to ensure that the head is level with respect to the impact surface.
( 4 ) Drop the head assembly from the specified height by means that ensure a smooth, instant release onto a rigidly supported flat horizontal steel plate which is 50.8 mm (2 in) thick and 610 mm (24 in) square. The impact surface shall be clean, dry and have a micro finish of not less than 203.2 × 10−6 mm (8 micro inches) (RMS) and not more than 2032.0 × 10−6 mm (80 micro inches) (RMS).
( 5 ) Allow at least 2 hours between successive tests on the same head.
# April 23: Military airstrikes continue against ISIS terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published April 23, 2017
April 23, 2017Release #20170423-01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**SOUTHWEST ASIA —**On April 22, Coalition military forces conducted 36 strikes consisting of 74 engagements against ISIS terrorists in Syria and Iraq.In Syria, Coalition military forces conducted 24 strikes consisting of 26 engagements against ISIS targets.* Near Abu Kamal, two strikes destroyed three ISIS well heads.* Near Dayr Az Zawr, four strikes destroyed 15 oil stills and five ISIS well heads.* Near Raqqah, 10 strikes engaged an ISIS tactical unit, destroyed 24 ISIS oil facility assets and a fighting position.* Near Tabqah, eight strikes engaged six ISIS tactical units and destroyed five fighting positions and two IEDs.In Iraq, Coalition military forces conducted 12 strikes consisting of 48 engagements against ISIS targets.* Near Kisik, one strike suppressed two mortar teams.* Near Mosul, six strikes engaged five ISIS tactical units; destroyed six mortar systems, four fighting positions, four rocket-propelled grenade systems, three ISIS vehicles, two front-end loaders, two ISIS watercraft, one weapons cache, and a tunnel; damaged 11 ISIS supply routes and a fighting position; and suppressed two ISIS tactical units.* Near Qayyrarah, one strike engaged an ISIS tactical unit.* Near Rawah, three strikes destroyed eight weapons caches and two ISIS staging areas.* Near Tal Afar, one strike engaged an ISIS tactical unit and destroyed an ISIS fuel truck.  Additionally, two strikes were conducted in Syria and Iraq from April 20-21 that have been closed within the last 24 hours.* On April 20, near Mosul, Iraq, one strike destroyed a rocket system.* On April 21, near Tabqah, Syria, one strike suppressed an ISIS tactical unitThese strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to destroy ISIS in Iraq and Syria.  The destruction of ISIS targets in Iraq and Syria also further limits the group's ability to project terror and conduct external operations throughout the region and the rest of the world.This Coalition strike release contains all strikes conducted by fighter, attack, bomber, rotary-wing, or remotely piloted aircraft, rocket propelled artillery and ground-based tactical artillery.A strike, as defined in the Coalition release, refers to one or more kinetic engagements that occur in roughly the same geographic location to produce a single, sometimes cumulative effect in that location.  For example, a single aircraft delivering a single weapon against a lone ISIS vehicle is one strike, but so is multiple aircraft delivering dozens of weapons against a group of ISIS-held buildings and weapon systems in a compound, having the cumulative effect of making that facility harder or impossible to use. Strike assessments are based on initial reports and may be refined.CJTF-OIR does not report the number or type of aircraft employed in a strike, the number of munitions dropped in each strike, or the number of individual munition impact points against a target. The information used to compile the daily strike releases is based on 'Z' or Greenwich Mean Time.
# Bomber Task Force mission to Middle East 

/ Published March 7, 2021

Release Number: 20210307-04 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 

SOUTHWEST ASIA (Mar. 7, 2021) – A pair of U.S. Air Force B-52H “Stratofortresses” flew a multinational patrol mission across the Middle East today to deter aggression and reassure partners and allies of the U.S. military’s commitment to security in the region. 

Multiple partner nations and U.S. Air Force fighter aircraft accompanied the U.S. bombers at different points during the flight, including Israel, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.  

The U.S. Air Force routinely moves aircraft and personnel into, out of, and around the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility to meet mission requirements, and to train with regional partners, underscoring the importance of strategic partnerships. 

Temporary long-range bomber deployments into the region dates back to 2015. This was the fourth bomber deployment into the Middle East this year. 

https://www.dvidshub.net/news/390761/bomber-task-force-mission-middle-east
Exhibit 24-7



POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, Rosemarie B. Greco do hereby appoint John W. Rowe and Randall E. Mehrberg, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange
Commission report on Form 10-K for 2004 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully
and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.



/s/    ROSEMARIE B.
GRECORosemarie B. Greco




DATE:
February 22, 2005
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES

The following table sets forth information as to Coherent's subsidiaries as of October 2, 2010 all of which are included in the
consolidated financial statements. Coherent owns 100% of the outstanding voting securities of such corporations noted below, either directly or indirectly.

Name

Jurisdiction of IncorporationCoherent (Deutschland), GmbH

GermanyCoherent (U.K.) Ltd.

United KingdomCoherent Japan KK.

JapanCoherent GmbH

GermanyLambda Physik USA, Inc.

United StatesCoherent Investments, Inc.

United StatesCoherent International Holding, Inc.

United StatesCoherent Holding, GmbH

GermanyCoherent (U.K.) Holdings, Ltd.

United KingdomCoherent B.V.

The NetherlandsCoherent Finland, Ltd.

FinlandCoherent Scotland, Ltd.

ScotlandCoherent DEOS, LLC

United StatesCOHR International Finance C.V.

The NetherlandsCOHR International Trading C.V.

The NetherlandsCoherent Europe B.V.

The NetherlandsCoherent Asia

United StatesCoherent (Beijing) Commercial Company Limited

ChinaCoherent Canada, Inc.

Canada


---



QuickLinks
# Map            Lithuania.
<PAGE>  1



                                                                   Exhibit 23










                        Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-42543 dated August 30, 1991) pertaining to the Cognitronics
Corporation 1967 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-42544 dated August 30, 1991 and Form S-8 No. 333-05897 dated
June 13, 1996) pertaining to the Cognitronics Corporation 1990 Stock Option
Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-05899 dated June 13,
1996) pertaining to the Cognitronics Corporation Restricted Stock Plan of our
report dated March 5, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Cognitronics Corporation, as amended, included in this
Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 1998.



                                                  /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Stamford, Connecticut
April 5, 1999
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Management and Budget

# AGENCY:

Office of Management and Budget, Executive Office of the President.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of the OMB Sequestration Update Report to the President and Congress for FY 2024.

# SUMMARY:

                        OMB is issuing the                         *OMB Sequestration Update Report to the President and Congress for Fiscal Year 2024*                         to report on the status of the discretionary spending limits and on the compliance of pending discretionary appropriations legislation with those limits.                    

# DATES:

August 20, 2023.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The OMB Sequestration Reports to the President and Congress is available on-line on the OMB home page at:                         *https://www.whitehouse.gov/​omb/​legislative/​sequestration-reports-orders/​.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Thomas Tobasko, 6202 New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, Email address:                         *ttobasko@omb.eop.gov,*                         telephone number: (202) 395-5745, FAX number: (202) 395-4768. Because of delays in the receipt of regular mail related to security screening, respondents are encouraged to use electronic communications.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 254 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 requires the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to issue a Sequestration Update Report by August 20th of each year statutory discretionary spending caps are in place. For fiscal year 2024, the report finds that, under OMB estimates, actions to date by the House of Representatives and the Senate for the 12 annual appropriations bills for fiscal year 2024 would not breach either the defense or non-defense caps if they were enacted into law. The report contains OMB's Preview Estimate of the Disaster Relief Funding Adjustment for FY 2024.

Shalanda D. Young,

Director.

[FR Doc. 2023-18052 Filed 8-21-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3110-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 36 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     February 14, 2001.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 554) to establish a program, coordinated by the National 
Transportation Safety Board, of assistance to families of passengers involved in 
rail passenger accidents. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. 
General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour 
equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. After general debate the 
bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. Each section 
of the bill shall be considered as read. During consideration of the bill for 
amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in 
recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused 
it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that 
purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as 
read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee 
shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have 
been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill 
and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one 
motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```