alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 585.105 Reporting requirements. ( a ) *Advanced credit phase-in reporting requirements.* ( 1 ) Within 60 days after the end of the production years ending August 31, 2011, through August 31, 2017, each manufacturer certifying vehicles manufactured during any of those production years as complying with the ejection mitigation requirements of Standard No. 226 (49 CFR 571.226) shall submit a report to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration providing the information specified in paragraph (c) of this section and in § 585.2 of this part.
( b ) *Phase-in reporting requirements.* Within 60 days after the end of each of the production years ending August 31, 2014, through August 31, 2017, each manufacturer shall submit a report to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration concerning its compliance with the ejection mitigation requirements of Standard No. 226 (49 CFR 571.226) for its vehicles produced in that year. Each report shall provide the information specified in paragraph (d) of this section and in § 585.2 of this part.
( c ) *Advanced credit phase-in report content* —(1) *Production of complying vehicles.* With respect to the reports identified in § 585.105(a), each manufacturer shall report for the production year for which the report is filed the number of vehicles, by make and model year, that are certified as meeting the ejection mitigation requirements of Standard No. 226 (49 CFR 571.226).
( d ) *Phase-in report content* — ( 1 ) *Basis for phase-in production goals.* Each manufacturer shall provide the number of passenger cars, multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks, and buses, with a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) or less, manufactured in the current production year, or, at the manufacturer's option, in each of the three previous production years. A new manufacturer that is, for the first time, manufacturing these vehicles for sale in the United States must report the number of these vehicles manufactured during the current production year.
( 2 ) *Production of complying vehicles.* Each manufacturer shall report for the production year being reported on information on the number of passenger cars, multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks, and buses, with a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) or less that meet the ejection mitigation requirements of Standard No. 226 (49 CFR 571.226). The manufacturer shall report the vehicles produced during the preceding years for which the manufacturer is claiming credits as having been produced during the production year being reported on.
Rough Riders train Afghan Uniformed Police
 By Spc. April York , 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division Public Affairs
  
 KANDAHAR, Afghanistan (September 14, 2011) — Soldiers from 204th Brigade Support Battalion, 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division, offer a sustainment excellence courses to Afghan Uniformed Police to teach basic-level skills at Forward Operating Base Walton. The course, which has been running for seven weeks, is offered to AUP who work in the 17 police sub stations located in Kandahar City and is offered twice each week. The course consists of three different stations and each station has a translator. The first station is vehicle preventative maintenance checks and services and generator PMCS. The second station is basic first aid and the third is the range where they go over weapon familiarization.“We are teaching them how to take care of themselves,” said 1st Lt. Adam Stear, the officer in charge of the 204th logistic training assistance team. “One of the main goals for sustainment excellence day is to link-up the AUPs with the contractors who are available to them.”Stear went further to say, “a lot of the AUP don’t know that [contractors] are out there and they don’t know the process so we are connecting the dots between them.”The AUP have two contracting companies to help sustain their vehicles and weapons. Alfa Omega Services is their weapons maintenance contractors and Automotive Maintenance Systems services their vehicles.While the AUP are rotating between the stations AOS services any of their non mission capable weapons and AMS services the vehicles the AUP brought with them in order to give them a better understanding of the services they offer. “So far we have had a great turn out,” Stear said. “We usually have about 30 AUP who show up and we split them into groups of 10 to rotate between the stations.”“The training is going really well,” said Sgt. Christopher Griffin, a medical technician with Company C, 204th BSB, who teaches the first aid course. “I’ve gotten good responses from them and they are definitely very appreciative of having the class.” “As long as the AUP understand that AOS and AMS are available and at their disposal then we are helping them accomplish their mission,” Stear said.
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT
C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N (C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2
, SU B P ART B

. SE04360A125
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fact Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jacqueline Danforth, President and Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  August 23, 2004

By:  /s/ Jacqueline Danforth

Name:  Jacqueline Danforth

Title:    President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal

Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          13,378
<SECURITIES>                                     1,471
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,817
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,383
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,633
<PP&E>                                           3,678
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,244
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  77,799
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,840
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        916
<COMMON>                                        27,094
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,411
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    77,799
<SALES>                                         65,291
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,291
<CGS>                                           23,749
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,367
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    76
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,955
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 104
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,171
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,030
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,971
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,971
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.84


</TABLE>
#### Henry Weiderwax, Jr., *Appellant, v.*Sherman Jaqua, *Respondent.*

— Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Boardman, J.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1333
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, on the relation of James E. Long, Commissioner of Insurance, as Liquidator of Twentieth Century Life Insurance Company, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CANDACE L. COOPER, Defendant - Appellant, and LOUIS J. HEVEY; GLENN H. MARTIN, Defendants.

No. 96-1392
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, on the relation of James E. Long, Commissioner of Insurance, as Liquidator of Twentieth Century Life Insurance Company, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus2 GLENN H. MARTIN, Defendant - Appellant, and CANDACE L. COOPER; LOUIS J. HEVEY, Defendants.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-92-783-5-F, CA-94-850-5-F2) Argued: May 7, 1998 Decided: June 23, 1998 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ARGUED: Walter Wm. Hofheinz, LAW OFFICE OF WALTER WM. HOFHEINZ, Dallas, Texas; Noel Lee Allen, ALLEN & PINNIX, P.A., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellants. V. Lane Wharton, Jr., BODE, CALL & STROUPE, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Anthony D. Taibi, BODE, CALL & STROUPE, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Candace L. Cooper and Glenn H. Martin appeal the district court's orders granting summary judgment to the Plaintiff on the claim of breach of fiduciary duty as to Cooper and for violations of North Carolina's Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 75D. We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm essentially on the reasoning of the district court. North Carolina v. Cooper , No. CA-92-783-5-F, North Carolina v. Martin, No. CA-94-850-5-F2 (E.D.N.C., Jan. 16, 1996, Feb. 1, 1996; Feb. 22, 1996).

AFFIRMED
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, October 20, 1995 (132), Para 132.2 Approval of the Journal]
[Page 1570]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.132.2  approval of the journal

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. UPTON, announced he had examined and 
approved the Journal of the proceedings of Thursday, October 19, 1995.
  Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Journal was approved.
```
#### § 535.2 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to reduce the fuel consumption of new heavy-duty vehicles and engines by establishing maximum levels for fuel consumption standards while providing a flexible credit program to assist manufacturers in complying with standards.
§ 25.230 Transition plans. ( a ) *Submission of plans.* An institution to which § 25.225 applies and that is composed of more than one administratively separate unit may submit either a single transition plan applicable to all such units, or a separate transition plan applicable to each such unit.
( b ) *Content of plans.* In order to be approved by the Secretary of Education, a transition plan shall: ( 1 ) State the name, address, and Federal Interagency Committee on Education Code of the educational institution submitting such plan, the administratively separate units to which the plan is applicable, and the name, address, and telephone number of the person to whom questions concerning the plan may be addressed. The person who submits the plan shall be the chief administrator or president of the institution, or another individual legally authorized to bind the institution to all actions set forth in the plan.
( 2 ) State whether the educational institution or administratively separate unit admits students of both sexes as regular students and, if so, when it began to do so.
( 3 ) Identify and describe with respect to the educational institution or administratively separate unit any obstacles to admitting students without discrimination on the basis of sex.
( 4 ) Describe in detail the steps necessary to eliminate as soon as practicable each obstacle so identified and indicate the schedule for taking these steps and the individual directly responsible for their implementation.
( 5 ) Include estimates of the number of students, by sex, expected to apply for, be admitted to, and enter each class during the period covered by the plan.
( c ) *Nondiscrimination.* No policy or practice of a recipient to which § 25.225 applies shall result in treatment of applicants to or students of such recipient in violation of §§ 25.300 through 25.310 unless such treatment is necessitated by an obstacle identified in paragraph (b)(3) of this section and a schedule for eliminating that obstacle has been provided as required by paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
( d ) *Effects of past exclusion.* To overcome the effects of past exclusion of students on the basis of sex, each educational institution to which § 25.225 applies shall include in its transition plan, and shall implement, specific steps designed to encourage individuals of the previously excluded sex to apply for admission to such institution. Such steps shall include instituting recruitment programs that emphasize the institution's commitment to enrolling students of the sex previously excluded.
From: Paul Freedman [mailto:pfreedman@limno.com] 

Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 2:11 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: “Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule” 

To whom it concerns

As a company with an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP), we are troubled that an

automatic classification of ESOP appraisers as fiduciaries would significantly compromise the

independent aspect of the firms conducting valuations and create angst whether the valuations

are truly independent and fair. We are uncertain how this regulation will impact the relationship

with our appraiser, as today they are a neutral objective resource for our company. This could

also increase costs to comply with the federal mandate for annual valuations.  I strongly

encourage you to reconsider this ill advised proposal.

Sincerely  

Paul Freedman

 

Paul L. Freedman, P.E., BCEE, F. ASCE 

President mailto: pfreedman@limno.com

LimnoTech http://www.limno.com/

501 Avis Drive 

Ann Arbor, MI 48108 

Phone: (734) 332-1200 Fax: (734) 332-1212

Mobile: (734) 646-0521 

Water | Environment | Scientists | Engineers
Afghan airmen lead mission to deliver school supplies
 By Capt. Tristan Hinderliter , 451st Air Expeditionary Wing Public Affairs
  Afghan air force security forces airmen with the Kandahar Air Wing carry school supplies to a school near Kandahar Airfield on Jan. 24, 2012. The mission was led by the Afghans and carried out with logistical and security support from coalition forces. (Photo by Capt. Tristan Hinderliter)
 KANDAHAR AIRFIELD, Afghanistan (January 29, 2013) — Afghan Air Force security troops with the Kandahar Air Wing led a mission to deliver supplies, including backpacks and soccer balls, to children here at a local school, Jan. 24. Force protection personnel assigned to Kandahar Airfield headquarters and security forces Airmen with the 738th Air Expeditionary Advisory Group here provided logistical and security support for the mission. “Today’s mission went really well,” said Master Sgt. Chad Roberts, a security forces adviser with the 738th AEAG who is deployed from Wright -Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. The advisory group’s mission is to assess, train, mentor, equip and assist the Afghan air force. There are approximately 500 students at the school, and the children are mostly age 12 and younger. The mission was one of many joint “presence patrols” carried out by Afghan and coalition forces. “The Afghans security forces are much further along than I thought they’d be when I got here,” said Roberts, who is four months into a one-year tour. “I was expecting to go outside the wire on a patrol with them once every couple months, but we’re trying to do it once a week now.” First Lt. Thomas Matechik, who is assigned to the airfield headquarters and deployed here from Minot AFB, N.D., coordinated the force protection support for the mission. “This was a great opportunity to partner (Kandahar Airfield) force protection with the Afghan Air Wing security forces and their advisers, and to conduct a patrol that is beneficial to everyone,” Matechik said. “We’d like to use this mission as a stepping stone to do more partnering with them in the future.” In addition to the Afghan air force security forces troops, four female U.S. Airmen helped hand out supplies to the female students. “This was a really rewarding experience,” said Senior Airman Samantha Williams, deployed here from Schriever AFB, Colo. “Interacting with the Afghan children was one of the highlights of my deployment so far.”
§ 605.33 Adjudication. ( a ) After reviewing the results of such investigation, including hearing transcripts, if any, and all evidence submitted by the parties, the Administrator will make a written determination as to whether the respondent has engaged in school bus operations in violation of the terms of the agreement.
( b ) If the Administrator determines that there has been a violation of the agreement, he will order such remedial measures as he may deem appropriate.
( c ) The determination by the Administrator will include an analysis and explanation of his findings.
§ 625.25 Transit Asset Management Plan requirements. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) Each tier I provider must develop and carry out a TAM plan that includes each element under paragraph (b) of this section.
( 2 ) Each tier II provider must develop its own TAM plan or participate in a group TAM plan. A tier II provider's TAM plan and a group TAM plan only must include elements under paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) of this section.
( 3 ) A provider's Accountable Executive is ultimately responsible for ensuring that a TAM plan is developed and carried out in accordance with this part.
( b ) *Transit asset management plan elements.* Except as provided in paragraph (a)(3) of this section, a TAM plan must include the following elements: ( 1 ) An inventory of the number and type of capital assets. The inventory must include all capital assets that a provider owns, except equipment with an acquisition value under $50,000 that is not a service vehicle. An inventory also must include third-party owned or jointly procured exclusive-use maintenance facilities, passenger station facilities, administrative facilities, rolling stock, and guideway infrastructure used by a provider in the provision of public transportation. The asset inventory must be organized at a level of detail commensurate with the level of detail in the provider's program of capital projects;
( 2 ) A condition assessment of those inventoried assets for which a provider has direct capital responsibility. A condition assessment must generate information in a level of detail sufficient to monitor and predict the performance of the assets and to inform the investment prioritization;
( 3 ) A description of analytical processes or decision-support tools that a provider uses to estimate capital investment needs over time and develop its investment prioritization;
( 4 ) A provider's project-based prioritization of investments, developed in accordance with § 625.33 of this part;
( 5 ) A provider's TAM and SGR policy;
( 6 ) A provider's TAM plan implementation strategy;
( 7 ) A description of key TAM activities that a provider intends to engage in over the TAM plan horizon period;
( 8 ) A summary or list of the resources, including personnel, that a provider needs to develop and carry out the TAM plan; and
( 9 ) An outline of how a provider will monitor, update, and evaluate, as needed, its TAM plan and related business practices, to ensure the continuous improvement of its TAM practices.
###### Editorial Note on Part 451

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 451 appear at 74 FR 49241, Sept. 25, 2009, and at 77 FR 59790, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 451.11 Application for approval-general.

(a) An owner of a new container, or a manufacturer acting on behalf of an owner, may apply for approval to any approval authority.
# CENTCOM Innovation Oasis Episode II

/ Published March 24, 2023

Mar. 23, 2023

Release Number 20230323-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla.**– Do you have an innovative solution to a particular problem?

Have you ever wanted to pitch your idea to leadership and see it come to fruition?

Now is your chance...

The CENTCOM Innovation Oasis II website is open and active!  https://openhive.us/inn-oasis-II

U.S. Central Command will host its second CENTCOM Innovation Oasis competition on May 25, 2023. The Innovation Oasis is a “Shark Tank”-like innovation competition that will highlight select U.S. Service Members and DoD / Service Civilian ideas, inventions, and processes to be presented for possible implementation. These new ideas help improve the quality of life, enable our forces, and improve the weaponry in the hands of our military.

The CENTCOM commander, Gen. Michael “Erik” Kurilla has fostered the culture of innovation as a key priority. CENTCOM is challenging its people to develop new ways of looking at old problems and to reset the way we think across everything we do.

For this episode of Innovation Oasis, all CENTCOM Component Commands will host an internal competition and nominate their top submission to compete in the main event of Innovation Oasis II in Tampa, FL.

The Winning Innovator for Innovation Oasis Episode II will get:

•           A service award

•           4-day pass, and

•           The opportunity to implement your great idea across the command

Submission Deadline is April 25, 2023.  Innovators submitting on behalf of Component Commands will submit in accordance with timelines published by their respective Commands.

Questions can be submitted to centcom.macdill.centcom-hq.mbx.centcom-innovation-oasis@mail.mil

-30-
§ 271.107 Safety outreach. ( a ) *Outreach.* An RRP shall include a safety outreach component that communicates RRP safety information to railroad personnel (including contractors) as that information is relevant to their positions. At a minimum, a safety outreach program shall: ( 1 ) Convey safety-critical information;
( 2 ) Explain why RRP-related safety actions are taken; and
( 3 ) Explain why safety procedures are introduced or changed.
( b ) *Reporting to management.* The status of risk-based HMP activities shall be reported to railroad senior management on an ongoing basis.
SHARON F. WARD

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 4634

_________ ____________________/

Opinion filed January 6, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Ross Goodman, Judge

.

Sharon F. Ward, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER C URIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, RAY, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
#### Joseph Bissecks v. Isaac N. Hebbard and others.

Judgment set aside and vacated, new trial ordered, with costs to abide event. Opinion by Daniels, J.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 31, 1995 (137), Para 137.26 Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 2546]
[Page 1821]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.137.26  providing for the consideration of h.r. 2546

  Mr. SOLOMON, by direction of the Committee on Rules, reported (Rept. 
No. 104-302) the resolution (H. Res. 252) providing for the 
consideration of the bill (H.R. 2546) making appropriations for the 
government of the District of Columbia and other activities chargeable 
in whole or in part against the revenues of said District for the fiscal 
year ending September 30, 1996, and for other purposes.
  When said resolution and report were referred to the House Calendar 
and ordered printed.
  And then,
```