alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Business and Economy    >Retail - Monthly    >FAQs    >Monthly Retail FAQs
 Skip to looking for section Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  Monthly Retail Trade Survey FAQs
  General FAQs
  General Questions Related to the Monthly Retail Trade Survey
  Sample Revision FAQs
  Questions Related to the Monthly Retail Sample Revision
  Weather FAQs
  Weather-Related Questions for the Monthly Retail Trade Survey
 Last Revised: June 09, 2020


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1253 CA 12-00514 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF ONTARIO SQUARE REALTY CORP., PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ASSESSOR OF THE TOWN OF FARMINGTON, DONNA LAPLANT, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

PANZARELLA & COIA, P.C., ROCHESTER (CHAD M. HUMMEL OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

BOYLAN CODE LLP, ROCHESTER (SHEILA M. CHALIFOUX OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Ontario County (Kenneth R. Fisher, J.), entered January 26, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to RPTL article 7. The order granted the motion of respondent to dismiss the petition.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this RPTL article 7 proceeding seeking review of the real property tax assessment of its property. Supreme Court properly granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition on the ground that petitioner failed to serve the notice of petition and petition within the applicable time period provided in CPLR 306-b. In opposing the motion, petitioner’s attorney submitted an affirmation seeking an extension of time for service in the interest of justice. Contrary to petitioner’s contention, it “was required to serve a notice of cross motion in order to obtain the affirmative relief of an extension of time to serve the [petition with a notice of petition or an order to show cause] upon [respondent] pursuant to CPLR 306-b” ( Lee v Colley Group McMontebello, LLC , 90 AD3d 1000, 1000-1001; see DeLorenzo v Gabbino Pizza Corp. , 83 AD3d 992, 993). In any event, the court properly considered all of the relevant factors in determining whether to extend the time for service in the interest of justice ( see CPLR 306-b; Leader v Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer , 97 NY2d 95, 105-106; Brown v Wilson Farms, Inc. , 52 AD3d 1324, 1324-1325), and the court properly denied petitioner’s request for that relief ( see Eggleston v A.C. & S., Inc.
, 17 AD3d 1167, 1167- 1168). Entered: November 9, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
#### § 585.43 Applicability.

This subpart applies to manufacturers of passenger cars, multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks and buses with a GVWR of 4,536 or less. However, this subpart does not apply to manufacturers that produce fewer than 5,000 vehicles annually for sale in the United States.

[72 FR 62142, Nov. 2, 2007]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2001
<CASH>                                         815,302
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,180,224
<ALLOWANCES>                                    60,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,417,896
<PP&E>                                         456,858
<DEPRECIATION>                                 123,485
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,446,239
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,545,386
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                        11,225
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,889,627
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,446,239
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,472,437
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,175,825
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,923,004
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,626,392)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,626,392)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,626,392)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.46)



</TABLE>
----

(2004/C 88 E/0677)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-4011/03

by Erik Meijer (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(9 January 2004)

Subject:   Implementation of PHARE project BG 0102.06 in Bulgaria: major disparities between the proposals drafted and the actual allocation of funding

----
# Update on withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan May 24, 2021

/ Published May 25, 2021

May 25, 2021

Release Number: 20210525-04

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

TAMPA, Fla. - U.S. Central Command provides the following update on the  orderly and responsible withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan, as of 10 a.m. on May 24, 2021.

Since the President's decision, the DoD has retrograded the equivalent of approximately 160 C-17 loads of material out of Afghanistan and have turned over more than 10,000 pieces of equipment to the Defense Logistics Agency for disposition.

Also, the U.S. has officially handed over five facilities to the Afghan Ministry of Defense.

U.S. Central Command estimates that we have completed between 16-25% of the entire retrograde process.

We expect to be able to provide weekly updates on the progress of the retrograde.

NOTE: For operational security reasons we will only be providing an approximate range of the percentage of the exit process that is complete. As the responsible and orderly exit continues, the size of the range will increase to preserve operational security. This update includes the progress on the retrograde of troops and equipment from Afghanistan, the turning over of equipment and facilities to the ANDSF, as well as the destruction of some equipment.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, October 13, 1995 (128), Para 128.7 Additional Sponsors]
[Page 1529]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.128.7  additional sponsors

  Under clause 4 of the rule XXII, sponsors were added to public bills 
and resolutions as follows:

       H.R. 540: Mr. Houghton.
       H.R. 864: Mr. Barr.
       H.R. 1575: Mr. Cox, Mr. Davis, Mr. Duncan, Mrs. Kelly, Mr. 
     Linder, Mr. Weller, and Mr. Barr.
       H.R. 1686: Mr. Cox and Mr. Christensen.
       H.R. 1715: Mr. Heineman.
       H.R. 1733: Ms. Furse, Mr. Serrano, and Mr. Tate.
       H.R. 1893: Mr. Schumer and Mrs. Kennelly.
       H.R. 2003: Ms. Woolsey and Mr. Hinchey.
       H.R. 2446: Mr. Horn and Mr. Poshard.
       H.R. 2463: Ms. McKinney.
       H. Res. 30: Mr. Bryant of Tennessee and Mr. Frank of 
     Massachusetts.
       H. Res. 220: Mr. Foglietta, Mrs. Maloney, Ms. Slaughter, 
     and Mr. Owens.

```
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 23, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 57479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18077]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to The National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Electrified Vehicle and Energy Storage 
Evaluation

    Notice is hereby given that, on June 15, 2023, pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Electrified Vehicle and Energy 
Storage Evaluation (``EVESE'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Honda Development and Manufacturing of 
America, Raymond, OH, has been added as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and EVESE intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On September 24, 2020, EVESE filed its original notification 
pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of 
the Act on October 15, 2020 (85 FR 65423).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 13, 
2023. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on June 13, 2023 (88 FR 38535).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-18077 Filed 8-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
From: Don Myrick [mailto:donmyrick@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 11:58 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Cc: gingrey.ga@mail.house.gov; saxby_chambliss@chambliss.senate.gov 

Subject: RIN 1210–AB33

Please abandon any plans that involve politicians and government bureaucrats "managing" my 

retirement funds. I trust the people in government less than anyone, especially now that 

generational theft is normalized in Washington. 

 

Don Myrick

Donald Euel Myrick 

"Gnothi Seaton"
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER REQUIRED BY
RULE 13A-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Quality Systems, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   By:
    /s/ Steven PlochockiDate: November 3, 2009
    
    Steven T. Plochocki,Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

N OTICE OF I NTENT TO D ISMISS FOR W ANT OF J URISDICTION

Appellate case name: Joel D. Mallory, Jr. v. West Bellfort Property Owners

Association

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 4

- 00 936

- CV

Trial court case number: 1039665

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County

The Court has directed me to notify you , as a pro se appellant, that the Court may dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.3(a). Y our notice of appeal of the order granting summary judgment may not have been timely filed. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.1 (a)(1) ; T EX

. R. C IV

. P . 329b (a) ; Powell v . Linh Nutrition Programs,

Inc. , No. 01

- 03

- 00919

- CV, 2005 WL 375334, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 17, 2005, no pet.) (holding that deadline for appealing from trial court’s order denying motion for new trial runs from date of signing of final judgment, not from date of order denying motion for new trial). Without a timely filed notice of appeal, this Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.1, 26.1.

Accordingly, the Court has directed me to notify you that the Court m ay dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction unless you file a written response to this notice, providing a detailed explanation, citing relevant portions of the record, statutes, rules, and case law to show that this Court has jurisdiction over the app eal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(a). Any response must be filed within 1 4 days of the date of this notice

. You must respond in writing even if you have previously claimed your notice of appeal was timely filed. If a meritorious response is not received in the form described above by the deadline, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction without further notice.

Clerk’s signature:

Clerk of the Court

Date: March 17, 2015
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

SAMUEL THEODORE ROSS, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

HONORABLE CAROLYN CARLUCCIO, 

JUDGE, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, 

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 66 MM 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 29th day of June, 2015, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED, and the 

Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
#### Theodore F. Miller, by Guardian, Plaintiff, v. Samuel D. Coykendall, Defendant.

New trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
IV

House Calendar No. 103

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 299

[Report No. 107–309]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 2299) making appropriations for the Department of Transportation and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30,

2002, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 30 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 29), 2001

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 2299) making appropriations

for the Department of Transportation and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, and

for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 2299) making appropriations for

4 the Department of Transportation and related agencies

5 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, and for
2

HRES 299 RH

1 other purposes. All points of order against the conference

2 report and against its consideration are waived. The con3 ference report shall be considered as read.

House Calendar No. 103

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 299

[Report No. 107–309]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2299) making

appropriations for the Department of Transportation and related agencies for the fiscal yearending September 30, 2002, and for other purposes.

NOVEMBER 30 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 29), 2001

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 335 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      January 29, 2002.
Whereas America's Catholic schools are internationally acclaimed for their 
        academic excellence, but provide students more than a superior 
        scholastic education;
Whereas Catholic schools ensure a broad, values-added education emphasizing the 
        lifelong development of moral, intellectual, physical, and social values 
        in America's young people;
Whereas the total Catholic school student enrollment for the 2000-2001 academic 
        year was 2,647,301, the total number of Catholic schools is 8,146, and 
        the student-teacher ratio is 16 to 1;
Whereas Catholic schools provide more than $17,239,224,112 a year in savings to 
        the Nation based on the average public school per pupil cost;
Whereas Catholic schools teach a diverse group of students and over 25 percent 
        of school children enrolled in Catholic schools are minorities;
Whereas the graduation rate of Catholic school students is 95 percent, only 3 
        percent of Catholic high school students drop out of school, and 83 
        percent of Catholic high school graduates go on to college;
Whereas Catholic schools produce students strongly dedicated to their faith, 
        values, families, and communities by providing an intellectually 
        stimulating environment rich in spiritual, character, and moral 
        development; and
Whereas in the 1972 pastoral message concerning Catholic education, the National 
        Conference of Catholic Bishops stated, ``Education is one of the most 
        important ways by which the Church fulfills its commitment to the 
        dignity of the person and building of community. Community is central to 
        education ministry, both as a necessary condition and an ardently 
        desired goal. The educational efforts of the Church, therefore, must be 
        directed to forming persons-in-community; for the education of the 
        individual Christian is important not only to his solitary destiny, but 
        also the destinies of the many communities in which he lives'': Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals of Catholic Schools Week, an event sponsored 
        by the National Catholic Educational Association and the United States 
        Catholic Conference and established to recognize the vital contributions 
        of America's thousands of Catholic elementary and secondary schools; and
            (2) congratulates Catholic schools, students, parents, and teachers 
        across the Nation for their ongoing contributions to education, and for 
        the key role they play in promoting and ensuring a brighter, stronger 
        future for this Nation.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001040257
<NAME> ZMAX CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       4,431,530
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,735,146
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     95,666
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,262,342
<PP&E>                                         282,661
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,346
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,709,921
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,158,403
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,909
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,539,608
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,709,921
<SALES>                                      2,581,139
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,581,139
<CGS>                                          755,387
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  755,387
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,404,889
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                420,863
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            420,863
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   420,863
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        

</TABLE>
#### § 581.1 Scope.

This standard establishes requirements for the impact resistance of vehicles in low speed front and rear collisions.
Exhibit 99.8

Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code

The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Report on Form 10-K of Exelon Generation Company, LLC for the year ended
December 31, 2002, that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information
contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Exelon Generation Company, LLC.

|Date: March 21, 2003 |  | /s/OLIVER D. KINGSLEY JR.Oliver D. Kingsley Jr.
Chief Executive Officer and
President
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks