alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# September 28: Military airstrikes continue against ISIS terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published Sept. 28, 2017
September 28, 2017Release # 20170928-01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEMilitary Strikes Continue Against ISIS Terrorists in Syria and Iraq**SOUTHWEST ASIA –** On Sept. 27, Coalition military forces conducted 44 strikes consisting of 66 engagements against ISIS terrorists in Syria and Iraq.In Syria, Coalition military forces conducted 35 strikes consisting of 39 engagements against ISIS targets.•Near Dayr Az Zawr, two strikes destroyed four ISIS supply routes and an ISIS headquarters.•Near Raqqah, 33 strikes engaged 10 ISIS tactical units and destroyed 23 fighting positions, a vehicle, and an ISIS headquarters; and suppressed three ISIS tactical units.In Iraq, Coalition military forces conducted nine strikes consisting of 27 engagements against ISIS targets.•Near Al Qaim, three strikes destroyed two weapons caches and an ISIS headquarters.•Near Huwijah, four strikes engaged two ISIS tactical units and destroyed six vehicles, an ISIS-held building, a command and control node, an ISIS staging area and a VBIED.•Near Ramadi, two strikes engaged two ISIS tactical units and destroyed six tactical vehicles and two vehicles.Additionally, eight strikes consisting of 10 engagements were conducted in Syria and Iraq on Sept. 26 that closed within the last 24 hours.•On Sept. 26, near Raqqah, Syria, seven strikes engaged an ISIS tactical unit and destroyed 16 VBIEDs, three vehicles, two ISIS supply routes, a fighting position and suppressed two fighting positions.•On Sept. 26, near Huwijah, Iraq, one strike destroyed 60 vehicles.These strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to destroy ISIS in Iraq and Syria.  The destruction of ISIS targets in Iraq and Syria also further limits the group’s ability to project terror and conduct external operations throughout the region and the rest of the world.This Coalition strike release contains all strikes conducted by fighter, attack, bomber, rotary-wing, or remotely piloted aircraft, rocket propelled artillery and ground-based tactical artillery.A strike, as defined in the Coalition release, refers to one or more kinetic engagements that occur in roughly the same geographic location to produce a single, sometimes cumulative effect in that location.  For example, a single aircraft delivering a single weapon against a lone ISIS vehicle is one strike, but so is multiple aircraft delivering dozens of weapons against a group of ISIS-held buildings and weapon systems in a compound, having the cumulative effect of making that facility harder or impossible to use. Strike assessments are based on initial reports and may be refined.CJTF-OIR does not report the number or type of aircraft employed in a strike, the number of munitions dropped in each strike, or the number of individual munition impact points against a target. The information used to compile the daily strike releases is based on 'Z' or Greenwich Mean Time.-30-
§ 7.25 How does DOT handle first-party requests? ( a ) DOT processes FOIA requests from first-party requesters in accordance with this regulation. DOT also processes such requests in accordance with the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a) if the records reside in a Privacy Act system of records (defined in 5 U.S.C. 552a(a)(5) as a system from which information is retrieved by the individual's name or some other personal identifier). Whichever statute provides greater access is controlling.
( b ) First party requesters must establish their identity to DOT's satisfaction before DOT will process the request under the Privacy Act. DOT may request that first party requesters authenticate their identity to assist with our evaluation of the application of FOIA exemptions, such as FOIA Exemption 6, 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(6), to the requested records. Acceptable methods of authenticating the requester's identity include those outlined in DOT's Privacy Act regulations at 49 CFR 10.37.
# NAVCENT Commander Meets with Egyptian Naval Leaders, Speaks of Bright Future with Egyptian Naval Midshipmen

/ Published June 23, 2021
MANAMA, Bahrain , 
Vice Adm. Brad Cooper, commander U.S. Naval Forces Central Command (NAVCENT), U.S. 5th Fleet and Combined Maritime Forces (CMF) visited Egypt June 19-21, to meet with the Egyptian Chief of Navy and speak to Cadets at the Egyptian Naval Academy.

Cooper met with Vice Adm. Ahmed Khaled, Egyptian Chief of Navy, and other top Egyptian Naval Force officials to reaffirm the longstanding relationship between the two nations’ navies, discuss maritime security and chart the way ahead for the growing maritime partnership between the two countries.

“Admiral Khaled has the Egyptian Navy moving in a great direction. I applaud his vision and efforts to modernize and enhance his Navy. I also enjoyed getting to know Admiral Khaled. We share a mutual vision for the need to promote maritime security and enhance the free flow of commerce in the region,” said Cooper. “He and the Egyptian Naval Force were extraordinary hosts, and my time here in Alexandria gave us a valuable chance to strengthen our maritime partnership.”

During the visit Cooper also toured the Egyptian naval base in Alexandria and addressed officers and cadets at the Egyptian Naval Academy, where he emphasized a shared bright future for both Egypt and the U.S. built on the strong partnership being forged and enhanced.

“Our Navy-to-Navy relationship has great momentum. Just this year, we have seen a significant increase in exercises at sea and U.S. Navy ship visits to Egypt. The best is yet to come, and I am excited to shape our bright future together with my friend, Vice Admiral Khaled,” Cooper told the junior officers and cadets.

In April, Egypt became the 34th member of CMF, an enduring multinational coalition formed in 2002 and committed to upholding the International Rules Based Order by countering illicit non-state actors on the high seas and promoting security, stability, and prosperity.

U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations encompasses about 2.5 million square miles of water area and includes the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, Red Sea and parts of the Indian Ocean. The expanse is comprised of 20 countries and includes three critical choke points at the Strait of Hormuz, the Suez Canal and the Strait of Bab al Mandeb at the southern tip of Yemen.
EXHIBIT 23.1

 

ACCOUNTANTS CONSENT

 

IndependentAuditors' Consent

 

 

 

The Board of Directors

Collins Industries, Inc.

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registrationstatements (No. 333-24647 and No. 333-24651) on Form S-8 of Collins Industries,Inc. of our report dated November 21, 2003,(except for Note 10, which is as of January 7, 2004) with respect to theconsolidated balance sheets of Collins Industries, Inc. as of October 31, 2003and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensiveincome, shareholders' investment and cash flows for the years ended October 31,2003 and 2002, which report appears in the October 31, 2003, annual report onForm 10-K of Collins Industries, Inc. Our report includes an explanatoryparagraph which refers to a change in accounting for goodwill and otherintangible assets in 2003.

 

 

KPMG LLP

 

Kansas City, Missouri

January 19, 2004
<PAGE>
 
                                 EXHIBIT 3.04
                         RESOLUTIONS AMENDING BY-LAWS
                         REGARDING TELEPHONIC MEETING
                                  ADOPTED BY
                           THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
                         SILICON VALLEY RESEARCH, INC.
 
                               NOVEMBER 12, 1996
 
  WHEREAS, Section 307 of the California General Corporations Law has recently
been amended to provide for alternative means of Board meetings through
conference telephone, electronic screen communications or other communications
equipment and to require the Company to develop a procedure for verification
of the identity of directors participating by various media in a directors'
meeting.
 
  RESOLVED, that Section 11.6 of the Company's Bylaws be amended and restated
in its entirety to read as forth below:
 
    Section 11.6: Meetings By Conference Telephone or Other Communications
  Equipment. So long as permitted by statute, directors may participate in a
  regular or special meeting through any means of communication, including
  conference telephone, electronic screen communication or other
  communications equipment. Participation in a meeting pursuant to this
  Section 11.6 constitutes presence in person at that meeting if each
  participating director is provided the means to communicate with all of the
  other directors concurrently and (1) the meeting is held by conference
  telephone or video conferencing or other communication mode enabling
  participants to determine, through voice or image recognition, that a
  participant is or is not a director entitled to participate in the meeting
  or (2) another verification device (determined in the discretion of the
  chairman of the meeting) is used to determine that each person
  participating in the meeting is in fact a director. Such verification
  method may include (at the discretion of the chairman of the meeting) use
  of passwords or similar codes for gaining access to the meeting.
 
  RESOLVED FURTHER, that "Silvar-Lisco" shall be replaced by "Silicon Valley
Research, Inc."
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.263 What happens when an employee is unable to provide a sufficient amount of saliva for an alcohol screening test? ( a ) As the STT, you must take the following steps if an employee is unable to provide sufficient saliva to complete a test on a saliva screening device (*e.g.,* the employee does not provide sufficient saliva to activate the device). ( 1 ) You must conduct a new screening test using a new screening device.
( 2 ) If the employee refuses to make the attempt to complete the new test, you must discontinue testing, note the fact on the “Remarks” line of the ATF, and immediately notify the DER. This is a refusal to test.
( 3 ) If the employee has not provided a sufficient amount of saliva to complete the new test, you must note the fact on the “Remarks” line of the ATF and immediately notify the DER.
( b ) As the DER, when the STT informs you that the employee has not provided a sufficient amount of saliva (see paragraph (a)(3) of this section), you must immediately arrange to administer an alcohol test to the employee using an EBT or other breath testing device.
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D23- 2571 LT Case No. 2018 - CF
- 007876 -A

_____________________________ C HRISTOPHER J EFFERSON , Appellant, v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________ 3.850 a ppeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Tatiana Salv a dor, Judge. Christopher Jefferson, Malone, pro se. Ashley Moo dy, Atto rney Genera l, and Da rcy Townsend, Assistant Attorney Gener al, Tallahassee, for Respondent. February 13, 202 4 P ER C URIAM . A FFIRMED . E DWARDS , C . J., W ALLIS , AND M AC I VER , J J., concur.2 _____________________________ Not fin al until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2013-0489

Docket Number

2008-SW-003-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

Bell Alert Service Bulletin No. 206L-05-134, Revision A, dated April 9, 2007.

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000707604
<NAME> BRITTON & KOONTZ FIRST NATIONAL BANK
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       4,523,652
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     130,509,625
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  8,539,714
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      32,291,805
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        32,169,437
<LOANS>                                    127,768,482
<ALLOWANCE>                                    780,651
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             184,076,927
<DEPOSITS>                                 152,694,798
<SHORT-TERM>                                 8,546,043
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          3,136,868
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,417,660
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,281,558
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             184,076,927
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,298,223
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,465,979
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             6,764,202
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,628,213
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,753,358
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,010,844
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   90,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,003,746
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,771,790
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,162,483
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,162,483
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .66
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.91
<LOANS-NON>                                    228,161
<LOANS-PAST>                                   323,291
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               746,738
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   66,356
<RECOVERIES>                                    10,269
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              780,651
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
§ 670.25 General directives. ( a ) *General.* The Administrator may issue a general directive under this part that is applicable to all recipients or a subset of recipients for the following reasons— ( 1 ) The Administrator determines that an unsafe condition or practice, or a combination of unsafe conditions and practices, exists such that there is a risk of death or personal injury, or damage to property or equipment; or
( 2 ) For any other purpose where the Administrator determines that the public interest requires the avoidance or mitigation of a hazard or risk.
( b ) *Effective date.* A general directive is effective upon final notice provided by the Administrator under paragraph (e) of this section.
( c ) *Notice.* The Administrator will provide notice of a general directive to recipients in the Federal Register. The notice will include at minimum— ( 1 ) A reference to the authority under which the directive is being issued;
( 2 ) A statement of the purpose of the issuance of the directive, including a description of the subjects or issues involved and a statement of the remedial actions sought; and
( 3 ) A statement of the time within which written comments must be received by FTA.
( d ) *Consideration of comments received.* The Administrator will consider all timely comments received. Late filed comments will be considered to the extent practicable.
( e ) *Final notice.* After consideration of timely comments received, the Administrator will publish a notice in the Federal Register that includes both a response to comments and a final general directive or a statement rescinding, revising, revoking or suspending the directive.
Exhibit 10.43

April 2, 1999


Mr. Philip Knowles
President & CEO
Kreative Video Products, Inc.
21638 Lassen Street
Chatsworth,  CA 91311

Re:     Termination of Agreements

Dear Mr. Knowles:

Per our telephone conversation earlier this week during which I
expressed concern over the likelihood of significant sales in the future
of our video products through distribution by Kreative Video Products,
Inc. ("KVP"), and further that American Champion Media, Inc. ("ACM")
wishes to terminate KVP's rights to distribute ACM's video products,
earlier than the one year period as specified in the distribution
agreements made between our companies.  In the same conversation, you
also indicated that you are in agreement to such termination if we so
desire.

We appreciate the efforts you have made so far in bring our video
products to market, and we would like to make the following settlement
or termination offer:

a)  The Non-Exclusive Distribution Agreement for Kanga Roddy Volumes 1 - 6
        dated August 19, 1998, and
     The Non-Exclusive Distribution Agreement for the Joe Montana -
Strong Mind Fit Body Workout dated August 21, 1998
made by and between KVP and ACM will be terminated as of the date of
this letter, with the rights and obligations of the two parties, as
specified in the two agreements, completely nullified and voided.

b)  For the 6-month period beginning April 2 and ending September 30,
1999, ACM will pay KVP 10% of net profits from sales of the Kanga Roddy
videos to Blockbuster Video Stores only (net profits = gross sales less
cost of goods, music license fees, talent royalties, director's and
KTEH's royalties), excluding sales of Kanga Roddy videos to any other
customer and excluding any sales of the Joe Montana - Strong Mind Fit
Body Workout video.

c)  For the 6-month period beginning October 1, 1999 and ending March
31, 2000, ACM will pay KVP 5% of net profits per terms as specified in
above Clause b).

I trust the above terms are acceptable to KVP, and if they are so,
please apply your signature below and return this letter via fax to:
408-288-8098.

On behalf of:                                   Agreed and accepted for:
American Champion Media, Inc.                   Kreative Video Products, Inc.

/s/ Anthony K. Chan                             /s/ Philip Knowles

Anthony K. Chan                                 Philip Knowles
Chief Executive Officer                         President & CEO
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk June 26, 2012 

# Order

June 26, 2012

145202 & (50)(51)

NADIA AWAD,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 145202

v CoA: 302692

Wayne CC: 01

- 013011

- CK

GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE

CORP (GMAC),

Defendant

- Appellee,

and

WAYNE COUNTY BOARD OF

COMMISSIONERS and ORLANS

ASSOCIATE, P.C.,

Defendants.

____________________________________

On order of the Court, it appearing that proceedings in this case are stayed by the

filing of a petition in bankruptcy (In re GMAC, Bankruptcy Court for the Southern

District of New York, docket No. 12

- 12020), the case is administratively CLOSED

without prejudice and without decisi on on the merits. Once the stay is no longer in

effect, this case may be reopened on the motion of any party filed within 42 days after the

date of the order removing the stay.
#### § 531.2 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to increase the fuel economy of passenger automobiles by establishing minimum levels of average fuel economy for those vehicles.
# Esper: Information Indicated 'Broad Scale' Attack Within 'Matter of Days'

/ Published Jan. 14, 2020

Defense Secretary Dr. Mark T. Esper reiterated his belief on Sunday morning talk shows that elimination of Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani would prevent an attack that could lead to more dangerous, open conflict with Iran.

"We had information that there was going to be an attack within a matter of days, that would be broad in scale, in other words more than one country, and that it would be bigger that previous attacks, likely going to take us into open hostilities with Iran," Esper said, while speaking today with Margaret Brennan on CBS's "Face the Nation" news program.

That attack, Esper said, was being orchestrated by Soleimani, who was killed in Iraq Jan. 3 by a United States-launched airstrike. Soleimani was head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps' Quds Force, which is designated by the U.S. as a terrorist organization. 

"He was the one who has led the attacks against America for 20 years now," Esper said. "So we had every expectation to believe that this would happen."

A "very senior" member of the intelligence community, Esper said, has said the risks associated with doing nothing to prevent the attack was greater than the risk of taking action. "That was compelling for me," he said.

The secretary said intelligence was briefed to lawmakers who are members of the "Gang of Eight." That bipartisan group includes members of both the Senate and the House. While Esper himself didn't sit in on the briefing, he said he spoke to one of the intelligence briefers who was in on the meeting.

"What the briefer said to me, coming out of that meeting, was his assessment that most if not all of the members thought that the intelligence was persuasive," Esper said. He also said that members of the group felt the intelligence should not be released to the broader members of Congress.

While speaking with Jake Tapper on CNN's "State of the Union" news program, Esper said he thinks the threat of direct action against the United States by Iran has diminished, but that Iranian "malign behavior" is likely to continue.

"I think our watchword is 'vigilance,'" Esper said. "We have to remain vigilant. What we have got to do though is get back to a position where they will come sit down with us. We can talk about how we get Iran to act like and behave like a normal country. That's what all of us want. That's what the regional partners want. That's what the Europeans want, is to get Iran to behave like a normal country."

Esper characterized that normalcy as meaning no nuclear weapons program, no long-range ballistic missiles, no hostage taking and no support to proxy groups.

"The United States is safer today than we were just a few short weeks ago," Esper said. "We eliminated the world's foremost terrorist, Qassem Soleimani, who had the blood of hundreds of American service members on his hands. Secondly, we restored deterrence with Iran and we did so without American casualties. And third, we reassured our friends and allies in the region that the United States will stand up and defend our interests."