U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001

21–710PS 2005

LIVE FROM SPACE:

THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION

HEARING

BEFORE THE

SUBCOMMITTEE ON SPACE AND AERONAUTICS

COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS

FIRST SESSION

JUNE 14, 2005

Serial No. 109–17

Printed for the use of the Committee on Science

(

Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.house.gov/science

(II)

COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE

HON. SHERWOOD L. BOEHLERT, New York, Chairman

RALPH M. HALL, Texas

LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas

CURT WELDON, Pennsylvania

DANA ROHRABACHER, California

KEN CALVERT, California

ROSCOE G. BARTLETT, Maryland

VERNON J. EHLERS, Michigan

GIL GUTKNECHT, Minnesota

FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma

JUDY BIGGERT, Illinois

WAYNE T. GILCHREST, Maryland

W. TODD AKIN, Missouri

TIMOTHY V. JOHNSON, Illinois

J. RANDY FORBES, Virginia

JO BONNER, Alabama

TOM FEENEY, Florida

BOB INGLIS, South Carolina

DAVE G. REICHERT, Washington

MICHAEL E. SODREL, Indiana

JOHN J.H. ‘‘JOE’’ SCHWARZ, Michigan

MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas

VACANCY

VACANCY

BART GORDON, Tennessee

JERRY F. COSTELLO, Illinois

EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas

LYNN C. WOOLSEY, California

DARLENE HOOLEY, Oregon

MARK UDALL, Colorado

DAVID WU, Oregon

MICHAEL M. HONDA, California

BRAD MILLER, North Carolina

LINCOLN DAVIS, Tennessee

RUSS CARNAHAN, Missouri

DANIEL LIPINSKI, Illinois

SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas

BRAD SHERMAN, California

BRIAN BAIRD, Washington

JIM MATHESON, Utah

JIM COSTA, California

AL GREEN, Texas

CHARLIE MELANCON, Louisiana

DENNIS MOORE, Kansas

SUBCOMMITTEE ON SPACE AND AERONAUTICS

KEN CALVERT, California, Chairman

RALPH M. HALL, Texas

LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas

DANA ROHRABACHER, California

ROSCOE G. BARTLETT, Maryland

FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma

J. RANDY FORBES, Virginia

JO BONNER, Alabama

TOM FEENEY, Florida

MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas

VACANCY

SHERWOOD L. BOEHLERT, New York

MARK UDALL, Colorado

DAVID WU, Oregon

MICHAEL M. HONDA, California

BRAD MILLER, North Carolina

SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas

BRAD SHERMAN, California

JIM COSTA, California

AL GREEN, Texas

CHARLIE MELANCON, Louisiana

BART GORDON, Tennessee

BILL ADKINS Subcommittee Staff Director

ED FEDDEMAN Professional Staff Member

KEN MONROE Professional Staff Member

CHRIS SHANK Professional Staff Member

ROSELEE ROBERTS Professional Staff Member

RICHARD OBERMANN Democratic Professional Staff Member

TOM HAMMOND Staff Assistant

(III)

C O N T E N T S

June 14, 2005

Page

Witness List ............................................................................................................. 2

Hearing Charter ...................................................................................................... 3

Opening Statements

Statement by Representative Ken Calvert, Chairman, Subcommittee on Space

and Aeronautics, Committee on Science, U.S. House of Representatives ....... 12

Written Statement ............................................................................................ 13

Statement by Representative Mark Udall, Ranking Minority Member, Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics, Committee on Science, U.S. House

of Representatives ................................................................................................ 13

Written Statement ............................................................................................ 14

Prepared Statement by Representative Sheila Jackson Lee, Member, Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics, Committee on Science, U.S. House

of Representatives ................................................................................................ 14

Witnesses:

Dr. John Phillips, NASA Astronaut, Science Officer and Flight Engineer,

ISS Expedition 11 (April 2005–present)

Dr. Peggy A. Whitson, NASA Astronaut, Science Officer and Flight Engineer,

ISS Expedition 5 (June–December 2002)

Oral Statement ................................................................................................. 15

Written Statement ............................................................................................ 17

Biography .......................................................................................................... 20

Lt. Col. Michael Fincke (USAF), NASA Astronaut, Science Officer and Flight

Engineer, ISS Expedition 9 (April–October 2004)

Discussion

Lessons Learned for Long-Duration Space Flight ............................................. 21

Safe Haven ............................................................................................................ 22

Resource Consumption ........................................................................................ 22

Effects of Long-Duration Space Flight ............................................................... 23

NASA’s Role in Inspiring Youth ......................................................................... 24

Language Barriers ............................................................................................... 26

Space Suits ........................................................................................................... 27

Radiation ............................................................................................................... 27

Lessons Learned for Long-Duration Space Flight (cont.) ................................. 28

ISS and the View of Earth .................................................................................. 29

ISS Orbit ............................................................................................................... 30

ISS Completion ..................................................................................................... 30

ISS Research Accomplishments .......................................................................... 31

The Impact on ISS From the Shuttle Grounding .............................................. 32

Russian Cooperation ............................................................................................ 32

Safety .................................................................................................................... 33

Research Aboard the ISS ..................................................................................... 33

Radiation ............................................................................................................... 34

Benefits of Human Space Flight ......................................................................... 35

ISS Configuration and Schedule ......................................................................... 36

ISS Resupply ........................................................................................................ 37

Resupply: ISS vs. Moon ....................................................................................... 38

ISS Configuration and Shuttle Launch Rates ................................................... 39

Page

IV

Challenges of Human Space Flight .................................................................... 40

Future CEV Designs ............................................................................................ 41

Microgravity Research ......................................................................................... 42

Appendix: Additional Material for the Record

NASA’s Space Station Program: Evolution of Its Rationale and Expected

Uses, Marcia S. Smith, Specialist in Aerospace and Telecommunications

Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division, Congressional Research

Service ................................................................................................................... 46

(1)

LIVE FROM SPACE: THE INTERNATIONAL

SPACE STATION

TUESDAY, JUNE 14, 2005

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,

SUBCOMMITTEE ON SPACE AND AERONAUTICS,

COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE,

Washington, DC.

The Committee met, pursuant to call, at 2:05 p.m., in Room 2318

of the Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Ken Calvert [Chairman of the Subcommittee] presiding.

2

3

1Detailed biographies of the witnesses are included in Appendix A.

HEARING CHARTER

SUBCOMMITTEE ON SPACE AND AERONAUTICS

COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Live From Space:

The International Space Station

TUESDAY, JUNE 14, 2005

2:00 P.M.–4:00 P.M.

2318 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING

Purpose

On Tuesday, June 14, at 2:00 p.m., the Committee on Science, Subcommittee on

Space and Aeronautics, will hold a hearing via satellite with National Aeronautics

and Space Administration (NASA) astronaut John Phillips, a member of the current

crew of the International Space Station (ISS). The other crew member on board ISS

is Russian Cosmonaut Sergei Krikalev, the Commander of Expedition 11, who will

not be participating in the hearing.

In addition to Phillips appearing via satellite, there will be two astronauts appearing in-person who have flown in space as part of the ISS program. The hearing

will provide Members with the opportunity to interact directly with those who are

operating and performing research on ISS.

This is the first hearing in Congressional history with a witness testifying from

space. It is possible because of advanced communications technology on ISS and significant preparation and coordination by NASA and the Committee. For technical

reasons, the video communication link will only be available for a limited period of

time, approximately 15 minutes.

Overarching Questions

The hearing will review the current activities onboard ISS, accomplishments of

the crew, status of current research on the Station, and observations on extended

human space flight, and explore the following overarching questions:

1. What are the biggest challenges and opportunities of living and working on

ISS?

2. What are the scientific (research) and engineering accomplishments that

have resulted from operation of ISS?

Witnesses

The hearing will feature the following witnesses.1

Dr. John Phillips is a NASA astronaut and is currently living and working aboard

ISS as the Science Officer and Flight Engineer of Expedition 11.

Dr. Peggy Whitson is a NASA astronaut, and was formerly a member of the ISS

crew during Expedition 5 (June–Dec. 2002).

Lt. Col. Michael Fincke (USAF) is a NASA astronaut, and was formerly a member of the ISS crew during Expedition 9 (April–Oct. 2004).

Background

In-orbit assembly of ISS began in 1998 with the launch of the first two segments:

the Zarya (‘‘Dawn’’) module, built and launched by Russia, but paid for by NASA;

and the Unity module, built by NASA and launched on the Space Shuttle in late

1998. In total, there have been 16 Shuttle missions to ISS (for assembly, logistics

and utilization), as well as 30 Russian launches to ISS (which includes three

launches of ISS modules, 10 Soyuz crew launches and 17 unmanned Progress resupply launches). In addition, astronauts have performed 58 spacewalks in conjunction with ISS (25 Shuttle-based, and 33 ISS-based), totaling more than 348 hours.

4

ISS has been permanently occupied by joint U.S.-Russian ‘‘Expedition’’ crews, rotating on four to six month shifts, since November 2000. The current crew is the

11th rotation, or increment, and is thus designated Expedition 11.

The United States is building ISS in partnership with Russia, Canada, Japan,

and 10 European countries. In addition, Brazil has a bilateral agreement with

NASA to participate in the program. The attached diagram illustrates the layout

of the various segments of ISS.

ISS assembly was approximately 50 percent complete (by mass) before the loss of

the Space Shuttle Columbia in February 2003 halted construction. Because the

Shuttle is the primary means of both assembly and re-supply for ISS, this has presented the ISS program with substantial challenges in conducting normal operations

for the past two years. Without Shuttle, ISS crews have relied on unmanned Russian Progress vehicles as the primary means for re-supply of spare parts and

consumables (water, food, etc.). Additionally the Russian Soyuz vehicles have been

the only means of ferrying crew to and from ISS. (A single Soyuz vehicle is always

docked at ISS at any one time to provide the crew with a lifeboat in case of emergency. Each Soyuz must be replaced every six months.)

Prior to the Columbia tragedy, ISS Expedition crews were composed of three

members: two Russians and one American or one Russian and two Americans. After

Columbia, the crew size was reduced to two (one Russian and one American) to reduce the need for ISS to be re-supplied. The partners plan to restore the three-person crew size this fall with the addition of a crew member who would be transported

to ISS on STS–121 (the second Shuttle mission after return-to-flight), scheduled for

later this year.

Despite the reduction in crew size, ISS Expedition crews have continued to conduct research while the Shuttle is grounded, primarily using equipment already

aboard ISS. (For a list of experiments being conducted by the Expedition 11 crew,

see Appendix B.) The post-Columbia accident Expedition crews have dealt with a

variety of equipment failures, such as repeated shutdowns of the Russian oxygen

generating device, known as the Elektron. According to NASA, there are sufficient

alternate supplies of oxygen aboard ISS, or scheduled to be delivered by re-supply

missions, that the Elektron failure is not currently a safety issue. A new Elektron

unit is scheduled to be delivered to ISS later this summer.

There have also been failures of two of the four Control Moment Gyros (CMGs)

that help keep the space station oriented properly. One CMG failed permanently

and is scheduled to be replaced on the next Shuttle flight. A second CMG was repaired by crews on spacewalks, but has failed again. NASA hopes to repair this second unit on the next Shuttle flight as well. Only two CMGs are required to maintain

the Station’s proper orientation. If another were to fail, however, proper orientation

can be maintained using rocket thrusters on one of the Russian modules. In order

to conserve rocket propellant, though, such an arrangement is not preferable.

NASA also is currently reformulating its scientific research program for ISS in

light of President Bush’s directive that the research be focused on projects that support the Vision for Space Exploration. In addition to gaining information about

human adaptation to weightlessness that may be needed for eventual human trips

to Mars, NASA Administrator Mike Griffin has cited the importance of the Station’s

potential role in testing hardware intended to go to the Moon or Mars. One example

could be closed-loop life support systems.

The Crew

NASA astronaut John Phillips currently serves as Science Officer and Flight

Engineer for ISS Expedition 11. Phillips flew aboard the Space Shuttle in 2001 on

STS–100, logging nearly 12 days and five million miles in space. He also served as

a backup crew member to ISS Expedition 7, completing that assignment in February 2003.

The other crew member on board ISS is Russian Cosmonaut Sergei Krikalev,

the Commander of Expedition 11, who will not be participating in the hearing. As

commander, Krikalev is responsible for the overall safety and success of the mission.

Krikalev is a veteran of five previous space flights, including two missions to the

Russian space station Mir and two Shuttle flights. He was a member of the first

ISS crew (Expedition One), serving aboard a much smaller ISS than that of today,

from Nov. 2, 2000, to March 18, 2001. Before Expedition 11, he had spent a year,

five months and 10 days in space. At the conclusion of this mission, he will be the

world’s most experienced space traveler.

Expedition 11

Phillips and Krikalev are currently living and working aboard ISS on a six-month

tour of duty. Expedition 11 was launched from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in

5

Kazakhstan on April 14, 2005 aboard a Russian Soyuz, which docked with ISS on

April 16, 2005.

Expedition 11 replaced Expedition 10, which was on ISS from October 2004 until

April 2005 (191 days). Expedition 11 is scheduled to return to Earth in October after

approximately 180 days on orbit. Plans call for Phillips and Krikalev to perform one

spacewalk. The astronauts will continue outfitting the exterior of ISS and work with

scientific experiments.

Phillips and Krikalev will also welcome the arrival of two Russian Progress unmanned supply vehicles, one of which is scheduled for launch on June 16 (and

should reach the Station on June 18), and the other is scheduled for launch near

the end of August.

Highlights of the Expedition 11 crew’s mission are scheduled to include welcoming

the return of Space Shuttle crews, STS–114 (Discovery) and STS–121 (Atlantis), if

the current Return-to-Flight schedule holds. The Shuttle missions will deliver several tons of supplies and research equipment to ISS, and the Shuttle crews also are

expected to conduct spacewalks. As noted, STS–121 may leave a third astronaut

aboard ISS to serve as a long-duration crew member.

Questions for the Witnesses

The witnesses were asked to address the following questions in their testimony:

Questions for Dr. John Phillips

In your testimony, please describe (and, to the extent possible, show during the

hearing) how you conduct a typical day on the International Space Station and what

are the greatest challenges, with specific attention to the following questions:

1. How have the loss of the Columbia Shuttle and the inability to use the Shuttle to re-supply the Station affected its operations during the last two years?

2. How do you deal with safety-related issues while on board ISS, such as taking shelter from solar flares, maintaining oxygen supplies, or keeping fit to

reduce the bone loss associated with long-duration space flight?

3. What research does the crew of Expedition 11 plan to conduct while on board

the Station?

Questions for Dr. Peggy Whitson

In your testimony, please describe your most important accomplishments (both for

assembly and operations) during your stay on the International Space Station, as

well as problems you may have experienced, with particular emphasis on the following questions:

1. What are the challenges of performing extravehicular activity (EVAs, or

spacewalks) from the Station? What can EVAs from the Station teach us

that we can apply to future Exploration-related activities?

2. What role does the micrometeoroid shielding you helped to install play in the

operation and maintenance of the Station?

3. What impacts did your stay aboard the Station have on your health? How

quickly did you become re-acclimated to Earth? How did your experience in

that regard compare to that of other astronauts?

4. What did you learn about the psychological dynamics and stresses of living

with a small crew in space? What was most unexpected about your experience?

Lt. Col. Michael Fincke was added to the witness list after the delivery of the

formal invitation letters, and thus did not receive questions to address for the hearing.

6

Appendix A

Expedition 11 Crew Bio

John Phillips (Ph.D.), ISS Science Officer and Flight Engineer, Expedition

11

John Phillips, 54, received a Bachelor of Science degree in mathematics and Russian from the U.S. Naval Academy in 1972 (where he graduated second in his class),

a Master of Science degree in aeronautical systems from the University of West

Florida in 1974, and a Master of Science and doctorate in geophysics and space

physics from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) in 1984 and 1987 respectively. He has been awarded the NASA Space Flight Medal and various military

awards.

Phillips received a Navy commission upon graduation from the U.S. Naval Academy in 1972 and was designated a Naval Aviator in November 1974. He trained in

the A–7 Corsair Aircraft at Naval Air Station Lemoore, California and made overseas deployment with Attack Squadron 155 aboard the USS Oriskany and USS Roosevelt. Subsequent tours of duty included navy recruiting in Albany, New York, and

flying the CT–39 Sabreliner Aircraft at Naval Air Station North Island, California.

After leaving the Navy in 1982, Phillips enrolled as a graduate student at UCLA.

While at UCLA he carried out research involving observations by the NASA Pioneer

Venus Spacecraft. Upon completing his doctorate in 1987, he was awarded a J. Robert Oppenheimer Postdoctoral Fellowship at Los Alamos National Laboratory in

New Mexico. He accepted a career position at Los Alamos in 1989. While there,

Phillips performed research on the sun and the space environment. From 1993

through 1996 he was Principal Investigator for the Solar Wind Plasma Experiment

aboard the Ulysses Spacecraft as it executed a unique trajectory over the poles of

the sun.

After being selected as an astronaut by NASA in 1996 and completing astronaut

candidate training, Phillips has held various jobs in the Astronaut Office, including

systems engineering and as International Space Station Spacecraft Communicator

(ISS CAPCOM).

In addition to his current space flight experience as Science Officer for ISS Expedition 11, Phillips flew aboard Space Shuttle Endeavour on the STS–100 mission

(April 19 to May 1, 2001). During the 12-day, 187 orbit mission, the Shuttle crew

successfully delivered and installed the Canadarm-2 Robotic Arm on ISS. They also

delivered experiments and supplies aboard the Multi-Purpose Logistics Module

Raffaello on its maiden flight. Phillips was the Ascent/Entry Flight engineer and

was the intravehicular activity coordinator during two space walks. Phillips also

served as a backup crew member to ISS Expedition 7, completing that assignment

in February 2003.

Witnesses Appearing In-person

Peggy Whitson (Ph.D.), NASA Astronaut, ISS Science Officer, Expedition 5

Peggy Whitson received a Bachelor of Science degree in biology/chemistry from

Iowa Wesleyan College in 1981, and a doctorate in biochemistry from Rice University in 1985. She has received numerous awards and honors, including the NASA

Space Flight Medal, and the Group Achievement Award for Shuttle-Mir Program.

Dr. Whitson has also had two patents approved.

Upon completion of her graduate work, Whitson continued at Rice University as

Postdoctoral Fellow until October 1986, at which point she began her studies at

NASA Johnson Space Center, as a National Research Council Resident Research Associate.

In 1992, Whitson was named the Project Scientist of the Shuttle-Mir Program

(STS–60, STS–63, STS–71, Mir 18, Mir 19) through 1995. From 1993–1996 she held

the additional responsibilities of the Deputy Division Chief of the Medical Sciences

Division at NASA–JSC. From 1995–1996 she served as Co-Chair of the U.S.–Russian Mission Science Working Group.

In April 1996, Whitson was selected as an astronaut candidate. Upon completing

two years of training and evaluation, she was assigned technical duties in the Astronaut Office Operations Planning Branch and served as the lead for the Crew Test

Support Team in Russia from 1998–99. From November 2003 to March 2005 she

served as Deputy Chief of the Astronaut Office.

Whitson served as NASA Science Officer on the Expedition 5 crew for ISS, which

launched on June 5, 2002 aboard STS–111 (Endeavour) and docked with ISS on

June 7, 2002. During her six-month stay aboard ISS, Whitson installed the Mobile

7

Base System, the S1 truss segment, and the P1 truss segment using the Space Station remote manipulator system, performed a four hour and 25 minute spacewalk

to install micrometeoroid shielding on the Zvezda Service Module, and activated and

checked out the Microgravity Sciences Glovebox, a science payload rack. She conducted 21 investigations in human life sciences and microgravity sciences, as well

as commercial payloads. The Expedition 5 crew (one American astronaut and two

Russian cosmonauts) returned to Earth aboard STS–113 (Endeavour) on December

7, 2002. Completing her first flight, Whitson logged over 184 days in space.

Michael (‘‘Mike’’) Fincke (Lt. Col., USAF) NASA Astronaut, ISS Science Officer, Expedition 9

Lt. Col. Fincke graduated from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology on an

Air Force ROTC scholarship in 1989 with a Bachelor of Science in Aeronautics and

Astronautics as well as a Bachelor of Science in Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary

Sciences. He then received a Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics

from Stanford University in 1990 and a second Master of Science in Physical

Sciences (Planetary Geology) from the University of Houston, Clear Lake in 2001.

He is the recipient of two United States Air Force Commendation Medals, the

United States Air Force Achievement Medal, and various unit and service awards.

In April 1996, Lt. Col. Fincke was selected as an astronaut candidate. Upon completing two years of training and evaluation, he was assigned technical duties in the

Astronaut Office Station Operations Branch serving as an International Space Station Spacecraft Communicator (ISS CAPCOM), a member of the Crew Test Support

Team in Russia and as the ISS crew procedures team lead. He also served as backup crew member for the ISS Expedition-4 and Expedition-6 and is qualified to fly

as a left-seat Flight Engineer (co-pilot) on the Russian Soyuz spacecraft.

Lt. Col. Fincke served as NASA Science Officer on the Expedition 9 crew for ISS,

which was launched from the Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan aboard a Soyuz

spacecraft, docking with ISS on April 21, 2004. He spent six-months aboard the station during which time he continued ISS science operations, maintained Station systems, and performed four spacewalks. The Expedition-9 mission concluded with

undocking from the Station and safe landing back in Kazakhstan on October 23,

2004. Lt. Col. Fincke completed his first mission in 187 days, and logged over 15

hours of EVA time.

8

Appendix B

Expedition 11 Science Overview

(The following section is adapted from the Expedition 11 press kit, available from:

http://www.shuttlepresskit.com/EXPEDITION11/index.htm)

Expedition 11—the 11th long-duration crew on ISS—began in April 2005, when

the 11th crew arrived at the Station aboard a Russian Soyuz spacecraft. NASA ISS

Science Officer Phillips and Russian Commander Krikalev, will maintain the Station and work with science teams on the ground to operate experiments and collect

data.

During Expedition 11, two Russian Progress cargo flights are scheduled to dock

with ISS. The Progress re-supply ships will transport supplies to the Station and

carry scientific equipment. Much of the research activities for Expedition 11 will be

carried out with scientific facilities and samples already on board ISS, as well as

with new research facilities transported by the next two Space Shuttle missions—

STS–114 scheduled for launch in July 2005, and STS–121 scheduled for launch later

in 2005. Additional experiments are being evaluated and prepared to make use of

limited cargo space on the Soyuz or Progress vehicles. The research agenda for the

expedition remains flexible. While most equipment and samples can remain on

board the Station with minimal or no detrimental effects, a few perishable samples—urine samples, for example—may be returned to Earth on the Soyuz.

The Expedition 11 crew has more than 100 hours scheduled for U.S. payload activities. Space Station science also will be conducted by remote ‘‘crewmembers’’—the

team of controllers and scientists on the ground, who will continue to plan, monitor

and operate experiments from control centers across the United States. A team of

controllers for Expedition 11 will work in the ISS Payload Operations Center—

NASA’s science command post for the Space Station—at NASA’s Marshall Space

Flight Center Huntsville, Ala. Controllers work in three shifts around the clock,

seven days a week in the Payload Operations Center, which links researchers

around the world with their experiments and the crew aboard the Station.

EXPERIMENTS USING ON-BOARD RESOURCES

Many experiments from earlier Expeditions remain aboard the Space Station and

will continue to benefit from the long-term research platform provided by the orbiting laboratory. These experiments include:

Crew Earth Observations (CEO) takes advantage of the crew in space to observe

and photograph natural and man-made changes on Earth. The photographs record

Earth surface changes over time, as well as more fleeting events such as storms,

floods, fires and volcanic eruptions. Together they provide researchers on Earth with

vital, continuous images needed to better understand the planet.

Dust Aerosol Measurement Feasibility Test (DAFT) tests the ability of different equipment to measure the levels of dust and air quality in order to improve

fire detection capabilities in space.

Materials on the International Space Station Experiment (MISSE) is a suitcase-sized experiment attached to the outside of the Space Station. It exposes hundreds of potential space construction materials to the environment. The samples will

be returned to Earth for study during a later expedition. Investigators will use the

resulting data to design stronger, more durable spacecraft.

Protein Crystal Growth Single-locker Thermal Enclosure System (PCG–

STES) will continue to process crystals that have been growing since Expedition 6,

launched in October 2002. Crystals that also were grown on Expeditions 2 beginning

in March 2001, as well as Expedition 4 launched in December 2001, and Expedition

5 beginning in June 2002, were returned to Earth for analysis. The facility provides

a temperature-controlled environment for growing high-quality protein crystals of

selected proteins in microgravity for later analyses on the ground to determine the

proteins’ molecular structure. Research may contribute to advances in medicine, agriculture and other fields.

Space Acceleration Measurement System II (SAMS–II) and Microgravity Acceleration Measurement System (MAMS) sensors measure vibrations caused by

crew, equipment and other sources that could disturb microgravity experiments.

9

HUMAN LIFE SCIENCE INVESTIGATIONS

Many continuing experiments will use measurements of Expedition 11 crewmembers to study changes in the body caused by exposure to the microgravity environment.

Chromosomal Aberrations in Blood Lymphocytes of Astronauts (Chromosome), will study space radiation on humans. The expected results will provide

a better knowledge of the genetic risk of astronauts in space and can help to optimize radiation shielding.

Promoting Sensorimotor Response to Generalizability: A Countermeasure

to Mitigate Locomotor Dysfunction After Long-duration Spaceflight (Mobility) studies changes in posture and gait after long-duration space flight. Study results are expected to help in the development of an in-flight treadmill training program for Station crew members that could facilitate rapid recovery of functional mobility after long duration space flight.

Behavioral Issues Associated with Isolation and Confinement: Review and

Analysis of Astronaut Journals collects behavioral and human factors data for

analysis, with the intention of furthering our understanding of life in isolation and

confinement. The objective of the experiment is to identify equipment, habitat and

procedural features that help humans adjust to isolation and confinement and remain effective and productive during future long-duration space expeditions.

Advanced Diagnostic Ultrasound in Microgravity (ADUM) involves crew

members conducting ultrasound exams on one another with minimal training and

with direction from a ground based sonographer. Verification of these advanced

ultrasound techniques and telemedicine strategies could have widespread applications in emergency and rural care situations on Earth.

The Biopsy experiment allows researchers to take biopsies of the astronauts’ calf

muscles before and after their stay on board the Space Station. This will allow scientists to begin developing an in-space countermeasure exercise program aimed at

keeping muscles at their peak performance during long missions in space.

Foot/Ground Reaction Forces During Space Flight (Foot) studies the load on

the lower body and muscle activity in crew members while working on the Station.

This study will provide better understanding of the bone and muscle loss in the

lower extremities experienced by astronauts in microgravity. The results of this experiment will help in future space flights, as well as have significance for understanding, preventing and treating osteoporosis on Earth.

The Renal Stone experiment collects urine samples from the crew and tests a possible countermeasure for preventing kidney stone formation.

A Comprehensive Characterization of Microorganisms and Allergens in

Spacecraft (Swab) will use generic techniques for the first time to comprehensively evaluate microbes on board the Space Station, including pathogens, and to

study how the microbial community changes as spacecraft visit the Space Station

and modules are added. This study will monitor Station modules prior to launch to

evaluate sources of new germs and find ways of preventing additional contamination

onboard spacecraft.

Space Flight-Induced Reactivation of Latent Epstein-Barr Virus (EpsteinBarr) performs tests to study changes in human immune function using blood and

urine samples collected before and after space flight. The study will provide insight

for possible countermeasures to prevent the potential development of infectious illness in crew members during flight.

DESTINY LABORATORY FACILITIES

Several research facilities are in place aboard the Station to support Expedition

11 science investigations:

The Human Research Facility is designed to house and support a variety of life

sciences experiments. It includes equipment for lung function tests, ultrasound to

image the heart and many other types of computers and medical equipment.

The Microgravity Science Glovebox is the other major dedicated science facility

inside Destiny. It has a large front window and built-in gloves to provide a sealed

environment for conducting science and technology experiments. The Glovebox is

particularly suited for handling hazardous materials when a crew is present. The

Destiny lab also is outfitted with five EXPRESS Racks. EXPRESS (Expedite the

Processing of Experiments to the Space Station) racks are standard payload racks

10

designed to provide experiments with a variety of utilities such as power, data, cooling, fluids and gasses. The racks support payloads in a several disciplines, including

biology, chemistry, physics, ecology and medicines. The racks stay in orbit, while experiments are changed as needed. EXPRESS Racks 2 and 3 are equipped with the

Active Rack Isolation System (ARIS) for countering minute vibrations from crew

movement or operating equipment that could disturb delicate experiments.

11

12

Chairman CALVERT. I call this meeting of the Space and Aeronautics Subcommittee to order.

Without objection, the Chair will be granted authority to recess

the Committee.

Today, we are going to have a special experience. We are going

from Capitol Hill ‘‘Live to Space Aboard the International Space

Station.’’ We will be talking to Dr. John Phillips, the current U.S.

astronaut on the Space Station. From his current abode in lowEarth orbit, 218 miles above the Earth, Dr. Phillips will be answering some of our questions about what it is really like to live in

space. This is the first hearing in Congressional history with a witness testifying from space.

Our goal today is to hear first hand from the astronauts what it

is like to live and work in space. We will hear directly from the astronauts on how they are dealing with the challenges of operating

and maintaining the International Space Station as well as hear

about the research they are conducting. This hearing gives us a

chance to learn about what is really going on in space from those

directly involved, rather than delve into the programmatic and

budgetary details of the ISS program.

Members, you will notice that you have information in your packets on special considerations in communicating with Dr. Phillips

and today’s hearing schedule. The other ISS crewmember who is

currently on board is Cosmonaut Sergei Krikalev, the Commander

of Expedition 11, will not be participating in the hearing. We also

have two astronauts who have joined us, each of whom have lived

on the ISS previously. First is Dr. Peggy Whitson, who was on the

ISS on Expedition 5 from June through December of 2002. Our

final witness is Lieutenant Colonel Mike Fincke, who was a member of Expedition 9 from April through October of 2004.

We are going to have a very—we will be very brief in today’s

opening statements, so that when we get the connection with the

International Space Station we can move right on to the questions.

Dr. Peggy Whitson has agreed to deliver the opening statement on

behalf of the three astronauts, giving us more time for questions

for each of the astronauts. Keep in mind that our connection with

International Space Station is a total of only 15 minutes. So instead of the usual five minutes for each member, we are going to

give each member only two minutes, which I will strictly enforce

to be fair for everyone. If we have time, we will go back around

again. That means you have two minutes totally for the question

and the answer.

Although we will be able to see Dr. Phillips on the International

Space Station, he will be unable to see us, so I ask that when you

ask your questions, please identify yourself. There will be a transmission delay, so please wait about a second after you turn on your

microphone before beginning to speak. There is also about a threesecond transmission delay before Dr. Phillips will hear you and will

respond. Be sure to speak clearly into the microphone. Again,

please ask only one question to Dr. Phillips in order to accommodate everyone. When we lose the connection to the International

Space Station after 15 minutes, members will have an opportunity

to ask questions with the standard five-minute rule of our two

former ISS astronauts that we have here with us today.

13

[The prepared statement of Chairman Calvert follows:]

PREPARED STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN KEN CALVERT

Today, we are going to have a special experience. We are going from Capitol Hill

Live to Space Aboard the International Space Station. We will be talking with Dr.

John Phillips, the current U. S. astronaut on the Space Station. From his current

abode in Low-Earth Orbit, 218 miles above the Earth, Dr. Phillips will answer some

of our questions about what it is really like to live in space. This is the first hearing

in Congressional history with a witness testifying from space.

The International Space Station (ISS) has been permanently occupied by joint

U.S.–Russian ‘‘Expedition’’ crews since November 2000. Dr. Phillips is a member of

the 11th Expedition. ISS is approximately 50 percent complete and we are waiting

to see what NASA plans to do for the final assembly complete. Since the Columbia

accident, the Russian Soyuz has been the means to ferry crew, and the Russian

Progress launch vehicle has been the means for re-supply of spare parts and

consumables. Prior to the Columbia tragedy, the ISS Expedition crews were composed of three members—two Russians and one American or two Americans and one

Russian.

After Columbia, crew size was reduced to two persons—one American and one

Russian. Despite this reduction in crew size, ISS Expedition crews have continued

to conduct research while the Shuttle is grounded, primarily using the equipment

that is already aboard. NASA will be reconfiguring the scientific research program

for the ISS to focus on projects that support the Vision for Space Exploration. The

ISS will be a great platform to study humans and their potential adaptation to

weightlessness as well as for testing hardware intended to go to the Moon or other

destinations.

Members, you will notice that you have information in your packets on special

considerations in communicating with Dr. Phillips and today’s hearing schedule.

The other ISS crew member who is currently on board is Cosmonaut Sergei

Krikalev, (pronounced sir-gay kree-ka-loff) the Commander of Expedition 11, who

will not be participating in the hearing. We also have two astronauts who have

joined us—each of whom has lived on the ISS previously. The first is Dr. Peggy

Whitson who was on the ISS on Expedition 5 from June through December 2002.

Our final witness is Air Force Lt. Col. Michael Fincke (USAF) (pronounced fink)

who was a member of Expedition 9 from April through October 2004.

We are going to be very brief in today’s opening statements, so that when we get

the connection with the ISS, we can move right on to questions. Dr. Peggy Whitson

has agreed to deliver the opening statement on behalf of the three astronauts, giving us more time for questions for each of the astronauts. Keep in mind that our

connection with the ISS a total of only 15 minutes to the ISS. So instead of the

usual five minutes for each Member, we are going to give each Member only two

minutes, which I will strictly enforce to be fair to everyone.

Although we will be able to see Dr. Phillips on the ISS, he will be unable to see

us, so I ask that when you ask your questions, please identify yourself. There will

be a transmission delay, so please wait about a second after you turn on your microphone before beginning to speak. There is also about a three second transmission

delay before Dr. Phillips will hear you and will respond. Be sure to speak clearly

into the microphone. Again, please ask only one question to Dr. Phillips in order

to accommodate everyone. When we lose the connection to the ISS in 15 minutes,

Members will have an opportunity to ask questions with the standard five-minute

rule of our two former ISS astronauts that we have here with us today.

Chairman CALVERT. And with that, Mr. Udall, you may begin

your opening statement.

Mr. UDALL. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

I want to join the Chairman in welcoming today’s witnesses, especially Dr. John Phillips, who will be with us from the International Space Station. I would also like to take a moment to express my personal appreciation to our witnesses, and to all of the

astronaut corps for the service that you render to our nation.

Human space exploration involves risk, yet it is an undertaking

that I and you, obviously, believe is important to the future of our

nation. You have been willing to accept the risk, because you also

believe in the importance of human space exploration.

14

Fundamentally, NASA’s science and exploration programs are

about pushing back the boundaries of our ignorance. And, properly

utilized, that is what I believe that we can do with the International Space Station, push back the boundaries of our ignorance

across a range of scientific and technological disciplines.

The advances we make on the ISS have the potential to prepare

us for the challenging human missions beyond low-Earth orbit.

They also have the potential to benefit life back here on Earth if

we are willing to invest in the necessary fundamental and applied

research.

To that end, I would hope that as NASA contemplates a restructuring of the ISS research program, it does not unduly narrow its

focus. We have spent too much time to build the Space Station not

to try to make optimal use of its capabilities. However, that is an

issue for another day.

At today’s hearing, I look forward to learning more about what

it is like to actually live and work in space. And I would also like

to learn more about how the astronauts on the Station are coping

with the impact of the Shuttle fleet’s grounding.

Mr. Chairman, today’s hearing should be fascinating. I want to

thank you for holding it, and I look forward to the testimony of our

witnesses.

[The prepared statement of Mr. Udall follows:]

PREPARED STATEMENT OF REPRESENTATIVE MARK UDALL

Good afternoon. I want to join the Chairman in welcoming the witnesses to today’s hearing—especially Dr. John Phillips, who will be talking to us live from the

International Space Station. And I’d also like to take a moment to express my personal appreciation to our witnesses—and to all of the astronaut corps—for the service that you render to our nation.

Human space exploration involves risk. Yet it is an undertaking that I believe is

important to the future of our nation. You have been willing to accept the risk, because you also believe in the importance of human space exploration.

Fundamentally, NASA’s science and exploration programs are about pushing back

the boundaries of our ignorance. And, properly utilized, I believe that that is what

the International Space Station program can do—push back the boundaries of our

ignorance across a range of scientific and technological disciplines.

The advances we make on the International Space Station have the potential to

prepare us for challenging human missions beyond low-Earth orbit. They also have

the potential to benefit life back here on Earth, if we are willing to invest in the

necessary fundamental and applied research.

To that end, I would hope that as NASA contemplates a restructuring of its ISS

research program, it does not unduly narrow its focus—we have spent too much to

build the Space Station not to try to make optimal use of its capabilities. However,

that is an issue for another day.

At today’s hearing, I look forward to learning more about what it is actually like

to live and work in space. I’d also like to learn more about how the astronauts on

the ISS are coping with the impact of the Shuttle fleet’s grounding.

Mr. Chairman, today’s hearing should be fascinating. I want to thank you for

holding it, and I look forward to the testimony of our witnesses. Thank you.

Chairman CALVERT. I thank the gentleman for his testimony.

Without objection, the additional statements of other Members

will be put into the written record, so we can get right to the questions. Hearing no objection, so ordered.

[The prepared statement of Ms. Jackson Lee follows:]

PREPARED STATEMENT OF REPRESENTATIVE SHEILA JACKSON LEE

Chairman Calvert, Ranking Member Udall,

15

I am honored to be here today for this historic Subcommittee hearing with American astronauts who have been on the International Space Station. I want to welcome our distinguished panel of witnesses to the Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics. Indeed, we have a unique opportunity to interact with Dr. John Phillips

who will be testifying live from the ISS; the first time in history such testimony has

taken place.

While I appreciate the Chairman and Ranking Member of this subcommittee for

organizing this hearing, I would be remiss if I did not reiterate my belief that we

need to hold a hearing on safety. After the tragic Columbia Space Shuttle accident

safety has been the number one priority of this subcommittee. I believe there should

be a safety hearing not only for our Space Shuttle which is returning to flight, but

also for safety on-board the ISS.

I have long been a supporter of the ISS and its mission. Indeed, this mission is

unique among other space exploration missions because of the cooperation between

nations. The ISS is truly an international program with the original partnership

being established in 1988 including the U.S., Japan, and the European Space Agency. Russia was later invited to joint the partnership in 1993, and revised international agreements governing the program were signed in 1998. Since that time,

the ISS has pushed the boundaries of what had been previously achieved in space.

The first ISS modules were launched in 1998 and astronauts began continuous occupation of the ISS in November 2000. At the start permanent crews consisted of

three astronauts, however, since the tragic Columbia Space Shuttle accident

grounded the Shuttle fleet in 2003, crew size has been limited to only two astronauts.

Because of the current limitations of our Space Shuttle program and that of the

Russian space program, the ISS has undergone some recent challenges in maintaining safe and sustained operations. In fact recently the Russian Elektron oxygen generator has been having repeated problems. Water and food have also been carefully

rationed. In late 2004, the Expedition 10 crew had to limit its food intake due to

shortages on-board the ISS. These problems are being addressed but they only underscore the fact that safety on-board the ISS must be more closely scrutinized.

At this time the ISS assembly is scheduled to be completed around 2010, but little

is certain as far as a timetable as NASA is currently reviewing the assembly schedule and content. As I stated, I am a strong supporter of the ISS and hope that we

can move forward with its mission. However, our mission for discovery can not be

done in haste; instead we must ensure that all steps have been taken to minimize

the risk to astronauts on-board.

Chairman CALVERT. I also ask unanimous consent to insert at

the appropriate place in the record, the background memorandum

prepared by the Majority staff for this hearing. Hearing no objection, so ordered.

Today, we will begin our hearing with testimony from Dr. Peggy

Whitson, a NASA astronaut who was formerly a member of the

International Space Station crew during the Expedition 5 from

June to December of 2002, as I mentioned earlier. If we have time

before we are connected to the International Space Station, we can

allow a couple of brief questions of Dr. Whitson and to Lieutenant

Colonel Michael Fincke sitting at the witness table. However, once

we begin the connection to International Space Station, we will immediately move to the two-minute rounds of questions to Dr. Phillips. Once we lose the connection, we will resume the questions to

Dr. Whitson and Lieutenant Colonel Fincke.

And with that, Dr. Whitson, you may begin your opening statement.

STATEMENT OF DR. PEGGY A. WHITSON, NASA ASTRONAUT,

SCIENCE OFFICER AND FLIGHT ENGINEER, ISS EXPEDITION

5 (JUNE–DECEMBER 2002)

Dr. WHITSON. Well, Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee, it is a real honor for us to be here today to testify about

the International Space Station. As mentioned, I am here with

16

Lieutenant Colonel Mike Fincke. He was Flight Engineer and

Science Officer on board during Expedition 9, and Dr. John Phillips

is serving in that same role on board the International Space Station right now.

I thought I would start off with just a few comments about my

experience on board the International Space Station and give you

a big picture of where John and Sergei’s mission is on orbit and

what we plan on as part of the next six months of their stay.

As a scientist, it was really exciting for me to be the on-orbit

hands of the investigators on the ground. And as uniquely, probably, or nearly uniquely, as the daughter of a farmer, it was also

a very exciting thing to do a soybean, commercial soybean plant

growth experiment while on board the International Space Station.

I think my dad had a greater yield of soybeans than I did, but it

was still a lot of fun to compare stories.

We also got—I also got to participate in another experiment that

I am a principle investigator on looking at the efficacy of potassium

citrate and reducing the kidney stone-forming potential in astronauts. Because of the bone demineralization process that occurs on

orbit, there is a greater risk of kidney stones forming. And actually,

we are continuing that experiment, and John and Sergei on orbit

are my next subjects, and they will be continuing that experiment.

My background in human life sciences really gave me a unique

opportunity to know in advance of my space flight all of the things

that might—I might experience when I went into zero gravity and

actually returning back to Earth, but I would have to say that even

I was surprised by how much a neuro-vestibular imbalance I felt

upon returning to Earth. As you know, the International Space

Station is orbiting at 17,500 miles per hour, and when I returned

to Earth, I felt like the Earth was orbiting around me at approximately 17,500 miles per hour. Luckily, that recovery was relatively

quick, and within a day or so, I had recovered from that particular

effect of being at zero gravity for a six-month period.

I am sure John is going to be really happy to share his experience on board the International Space Station with you and some

of his science background that he is working on up there. In addition to the science activities they are doing, John and Sergei are

doing a space walk to set up some experiments externally. They are

also going to be performing a number of maintenance tests, routine

maintenance tests. They will be greeting two progress resupply vehicles. These are Russian resupply vehicles. One is actually arriving to the International Space Station later this week.

And then, of course, we are very excited about the arrival of the

Discovery with Eileen Collins and her six crew members on the

Shuttle return to flight. So they will be on board during that mission as well. During that time, during the docked phase of that

Shuttle mission, they will do—perform three space walks and

transfer, literally, tons of hardware to and from the Station.

The Expedition 11 crew has more than 100 hours of science and

payload activities planned. In addition to being the subjects for my

experiment, they are also doing a number of different activities

looking at the human physiology and the effects of long duration

and being in space. And one of the more interesting studies that,

actually, Mike and I both participated in and is being continued is

17

developing the techniques using ultrasound by non-experienced

crew members or untrained professionals to do ultrasounds in a

very complex manner. And actually, that is something that can

apply to us here on Earth as well in real medicine scenarios or

even on battlefields. So we are excited about that research as well.

In summary, I just wanted to say that the International Space

Station is an incredible engineering feat, and our studies to understand how the human body responds to that and our understanding

of all of the complications and problems that arise as a part of operating this Station is going to help us prepare for the longer duration missions to the Moon and Mars and beyond.

And Mike and I are really excited about taking any questions

you might have, and we will get a signal here in a little bit about

when we can start talking to John.

[The prepared statement of Dr. Whitson follows:]

PREPARED STATEMENT OF PEGGY A. WHITSON

Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity

to appear before you today. I consider it an honor to appear here with Mike Fincke,

who was the Science Officer on Expedition 9. In just a few minutes, John Phillips,

Expedition 11 Flight Engineer and Science Officer, will be appearing live, via satellite, from the ISS to answer questions about life on orbit. First, I’d like to tell you

a little about my experience on the Station as part of Expedition 5 and then provide

you with an overview of current activities aboard the Station.

Life and Work Aboard the International Space Station

In the over four years of continuous human presence on board the ISS, we have

performed important science that will allow us to expand our presence into the solar

system. We have discovered things that make our life here on Earth better. We have

learned about technologies and processes which will help us meet the challenges of

future exploration.

While we can to some extent simulate living conditions in space here on the

ground, there is no substitute for experience in the actual space environment. Simply put, to learn how to live in space, we must live in space. Every experiment,

every space walk, every repair and every piece of hardware assembled teaches us

something new. A full time human presence aboard the ISS offers us a tremendous

opportunity to study human survival in the hostile environment of space and assess

how to overcome the technological hurdles to human exploration beyond Earth orbit,

as called for in the Vision for Space Exploration.

During my time on Station (Expedition 5), we hosted three Shuttle assembly missions. Using the Station’s robotic arm, we installed the S1 (starboard 1) and P1

(port 1) truss elements and the Mobile Base System, which serves as the platform

for transporting the robotic arm and any attached hardware or experiments to various locations along the truss.

We also performed two extra-vehicular activities (EVA). Space walks are a physical challenge, since we work in a pressurized suit that protects us from the vacuum

of space, but requires us to perform hand-intensive tasks working against this pressure. EVAs are also an operational challenge, especially now while we have only

two-person crews, since both crew members are outside. From these activities we

continue to learn a great deal about assembly of Station elements, repair of external

components, operational processes, and spacesuit capabilities.

As a scientist, it was, of course, exciting being the on orbit hands of the investigator teams on the ground. Being the daughter of a farmer, I would have to say

that the commercial experiment involving soybean growth was very, very special to

me as well. I also had the unique opportunity to be the principal investigator and

the subject for my own experiment to test potassium citrate ingestion as a mechanism to reduce the kidney stone-forming potential in space travelers. In fact, I am

still working on this experiment, albeit from the ground, with Expedition 11 as our

primary subjects. A few of the other experiments we conducted on Expedition 5 included: super-conducting crystal materials with different technical additives and in

different heating profiles to better assess the crystallization characteristics in an environment where gravity is not a variable, assessing pulmonary lung function before

and after EVA, and developing procedures for diagnostic ultrasound capability.

18

My background in the human space life sciences provided me with a lot of insight

into the potential physiologic responses that a crew member might anticipate upon

entering and returning from microgravity. However, I was still surprised by the low

back pain as my spinal column relaxed, and the surrounding muscles stretched out

on flight day four and five. Although individual crew responses can vary dramatically, I was also surprised by the neuro-vestibular imbalance I felt upon returning

to Earth’s gravity after six months on orbit. For the first 24 hours, I felt like the

world was spinning around me; as if I were still on orbit, and I thought they should

just send me back to the Station. Luckily for me, recovery was relatively quick after

that first day.

As a result of a very intensive exercise regime, I lost no overall bone density. This

is very promising for us in the development of exercise programs for extended exploration missions to Mars when we will need to have an exercise and/or pharmacologic

plan to minimize the impacts of extended periods in microgravity.

We typically train prior to flight for three or more years. Much of that time is

spent with crew mates in classroom training and simulations. I consider this a very

important time to learn not only about us, but the best way to constructively interact with our crew mates and our ground support teams. The loss of Columbia meant

that we had to reduce the Station crew size to two. As a result, our crews and

ground teams have come up with creative new methods to squeeze in more work

and provide better support. Although I had great respect for the work conducted by

the ground team even before I flew, I was surprised by how close I felt to them during my mission. As Mike and John can tell you, the ground crew acts as a ‘‘third’’

crew member for our two-person crews by helping them with everything from monitoring the Station to assisting with research.

Safety is something we all take as a fundamental value in how we build and operate the Station. An intensive system safety engineering effort during the development and manufacture of the International Space Station system has mitigated the

known hazards presented by living in low-Earth orbit. For example, we have design

features, such as the Micro Meteoroid Orbital Debris (MMOD) shields on the Service

Module to reduce the chance that orbital debris will penetrate the Station. In fact,

more of these panels will be installed in the future to even further reduce this probability. We have a caution and warning system installed to alert the crew to any

impending dangers, such as fire or pressure leaks that may raise the risk of injury,

we have emergency equipment on the Station such as fire suppression to reduce the

consequence of fire, and we have a ‘‘lifeboat,’’ the Soyuz crew return vehicle, which

we can use as a last resort if we have to abandon the Station should the living conditions become untenable. Ground-based and on-orbit safety-related training are a

large part of our pre-mission preparation and during the mission. In addition, the

ground team also plays a large role in ensuring the safety of the Station and the

crew by providing maintenance procedures for both critical as well as non-critical

equipment, by providing real-time information and pre-cautions for events like solar

flares or by providing feedback on exercise regimes.

Expedition 11 Mission

In April, we sent a new crew to live on the International Space Station. Flight

Engineer John Phillips and Station Commander Sergei Krikalev will perform one

space walk, a number of experiments, and daily maintenance during their six-month

stay. They will greet two Russian Progress resupply vehicles, including one that arrives this week, and at least one U.S. Space Shuttle flight. They will also relocate

their Soyuz spacecraft from the Pirs docking port to the Zarya docking port in order

to free up the Pirs airlock to support the space walk.

During the space walk from the Russian Pirs airlock in September, the crew will

relocate and recover Russian science equipment.

Expedition 11 will be on board the Station when Commander Eileen Collins and

her six crew members launch on the Space Shuttle Discovery on the first post-Columbia mission. It will mark the first time since the STS–113 mission in November

2002 that a Space Shuttle will arrive at the Station. The two crews plan eight days

of joint docked operations, including the resupply of the Station with several tons

of food and equipment, as well as three space walks out of the Shuttle’s airlock by

Discovery astronauts.

Expedition 11 Science

Much of the research activities for Expedition 11 will be carried out with scientific

facilities and samples already on board the Space Station, as well as with new research facilities transported by the next two Space Shuttle missions. While most

equipment and samples can remain on board the Station with minimal or no detrimental effects, a few perishable samples will be returned to Earth on the Soyuz.

19

The Expedition 11 crew has more than 100 hours scheduled for U.S. payload activities. In addition to the crew on the Station, a team of controllers for Expedition

11 will work in the Space Station’s Payload Operations Center—NASA’s science

command post for the Space Station at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in

Huntsville, Alabama. Controllers link researchers around the world with their experiments and the crew aboard the Station.

Other experiments to be conducted by Expedition 11 include:

• Advanced Diagnostic Ultrasound in Microgravity (ADUM):

Advanced Diagnostic Ultrasound in Microgravity (ADUM) will be used to determine the ability of minimally trained Station crew members to perform advanced ultrasound examinations after using a computer-based training program. Verification of these advanced ultrasound techniques and telemedicine

strategies could have widespread applications in emergency and rural care

situations on Earth. The ADUM experiment, which uses remote guidance

methodologies, has been conducted during Expeditions 8, 9 and 10 and is

scheduled for completion with the Increment 11 crew.

• Foot/Ground Reaction Forces During Space Flight (FOOT):

FOOT studies the load on the lower body and muscle activity in crew members while working on the Station. Previous portions of this study on earlier

increments have provided better understanding of the bone and muscle loss

in the lower extremities experienced by astronauts in microgravity. The results of this experiment will help in future space flights, as well as potentially improve our understanding to prevent and treat osteoporosis.

• Dust and Aerosol Measurement Feasibility Test (DAFT):

DAFT releases particles in the Space Station atmosphere to test the ability

of different equipment to measure the levels of dust and air quality. It will

help to improve air quality and fire detection in space.

• Hand Posture Analyzer (HPA):

HPA will investigate the performance degradation of the human upper limb

muscle-skeletal apparatus and its morphological-functional modifications during long-term exposure to weightlessness and to study the role of gravity in

how people reach, grasp, manipulate, and transport objects.

• Passive Observatories for Experimental Microbial Systems (POEMS):

POEMS will study the growth, ecology and performance of diverse assemblages of micro-organisms in space. Understanding microbial growth and ecology in a space environment is important for maintaining human health and

bioregenerative life support functions.

• A Comprehensive Characterization of Micro-organisms and Allergens

in Spacecraft (SWAB):

SWAB uses genetic techniques for the first time to comprehensively evaluate

germs, including pathogens, on board the Space Station, and to study how the

germ community changes as spacecrafts visit the Space Station and modules

are added. This study will monitor Station modules prior to launch to evaluate sources of new germs and find ways of preventing additional contamination on board spacecraft.

• Crew Earth Observations (CEO):

CEO takes advantage of the crew in space to observe and photograph natural

and man-made changes on Earth, the photographs record Earth surface

changes over time, as well as more fleeting events such as storms, floods,

fires, and volcanic eruptions. Together they provide researchers on Earth

with vital, continuous images needed to better understand the planet.

Summary

As stated at the beginning of my testimony, using the Station to study human

endurance in space and to test new technologies will allow us to prepare for the

longer journeys to the Moon, Mars and beyond in support of the Vision for Space

Exploration. Thank you for the opportunity to testify today. My fellow witnesses and

I look forward to responding to any questions you may have.

20

BIOGRAPHY FOR PEGGY A. WHITSON

NASA ASTRONAUT

PERSONAL DATA:

Born February 9, 1960 in Mt. Ayr, Iowa. Hometown is Beaconsfield, Iowa. Married to Clarence F. Sams, Ph.D. She enjoys weight lifting, biking, basketball, and

water skiing.

EDUCATION:

Graduated from Mt. Ayr Community High School, Mt. Ayr, Iowa, in 1978; received a Bachelor of Science degree in Biology/Chemistry from Iowa Wesleyan College in 1981, and a Doctorate in Biochemistry from Rice University in 1985.

AWARDS/HONORS:

NASA Space Flight Medal (2002). Two patents approved (1997, 1998); Group

Achievement Award for Shuttle–Mir Program (1996); American Astronautical Society Randolph Lovelace II Award (1995); NASA Tech Brief Award (1995); NASA

Space Act Board Award (1995, 1998); NASA Silver Snoopy Award (1995); NASA Exceptional Service Medal (1995, 2003); NASA Space Act Award for Patent Application; NASA Certificate of Commendation (1994); Selected for Space Station Redesign

Team (March–June 1993); NASA Sustained Superior Performance Award (1990);

Krug International Merit Award (1989); NASA–JSC National Research Council

Resident Research Associate (1986–1988); Robert A. Welch Postdoctoral Fellowship

(1985–1986); Robert A. Welch Predoctoral Fellowship (1982–1985), Summa Cum

Laude from Iowa Wesleyan College (1981); President’s Honor Roll (1978–81); Orange van Calhoun Scholarship (1980); State of Iowa Scholar (1979); Academic Excellence Award (1978).

EXPERIENCE:

From 1981 to 1985, Whitson conducted her graduate work in biochemistry at Rice

University, Houston, Texas, as a Robert A. Welch Predoctoral Fellow. Following

completion of her graduate, work she continued at Rice University as a Robert A

Welch Postdoctoral Fellow until October 1986. Following this position, she began

her studies at NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, as a National Research

Council Resident Research Associate. From April 1988 until September 1989,

Whitson served as the Supervisor for the Biochemistry Research Group at KRUG

International, a medical sciences contractor at NASA–JSC. In 1991–1997, Whitson

was also invited to be an Adjunct Assistant Professor in the Department of Internal

Medicine and Department of Human Biological Chemistry and Genetics at University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas. In 1997, Whitson began a position

as Adjunct Assistant Professor at Rice University in the Maybee Laboratory for Biochemical and Genetic Engineering.

NASA EXPERIENCE:

From 1989 to 1993, Whitson worked as a Research Biochemist in the Biomedical

Operations and Research Branch at NASA–JSC. From 1991–1993, she served as

Technical Monitor of the Biochemistry Research Laboratories in the Biomedical Operations and Research Branch. From 1991–1992 she was the Payload Element Developer for Bone Cell Research Experiment (E10) aboard SL–J (STS–47), and was

a member of the U.S.–USSR Joint Working Group in Space Medicine and Biology.

In 1992, she was named the Project Scientist of the Shuttle–Mir Program (STS–60,

STS–63, STS–71, Mir 18, Mir 19) and served in this capacity until the conclusion

of the Phase 1A Program in 1995. From 1993–1996 Whitson held the additional responsibilities of the Deputy Division Chief of the Medical Sciences Division at

NASA–JSC. From 1995–1996 she served as Co-Chair of the U.S.-Russian Mission

Science Working Group. In April 1996, she was selected as an astronaut candidate

and started training, in August 1996. Upon completing two years of training and

evaluation, she was assigned technical duties in the Astronaut Office Operations

Planning Branch and served as the lead for the Crew Test Support Team in Russia

from 1998–99. From November 2003 to March 2005 she served as Deputy Chief of

the Astronaut Office. Dr. Whitson currently serves as Chief of the Station Operations Branch, Astronaut Office.

SPACE FLIGHT EXPERIENCE:

The Expedition 5 crew launched on June 5, 2002 aboard STS–111 and docked

with the International Space Station on June 7, 2002. During her six-month stay

aboard the Space Station, Dr. Whitson installed the Mobile Base System, the S1

truss segment, and the P1 truss segment using the space station remote manipulator system, performed a four-hour and 25-minute Orlan EVA to install micrometeVerDate 11-MAY-2000 07:13 Dec 08, 2005 Jkt 021710 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 C:\WORKD\SA05\061405\21710 SCIENCE1 PsN: SCIENCE1
21

oroid shielding on the Zvezda Service Module, and activated and checked out the

Microgravity Sciences Glovebox, a facility class payload rack. She was named the

first NASA Science Officer during her stay, and she conducted 21 investigations in

human life sciences and microgravity sciences, as well as commercial payloads. The

Expedition 5 crew (one American Astronaut and two Russian Cosmonauts) returned

to Earth aboard STS–113 on December 7, 2002. Completing her first flight, Dr.

Whitson logged 184 days, 22 hours and 14 minutes in space.

DISCUSSION

LESSONS LEARNED FOR LONG-DURATION SPACE FLIGHT

Chairman CALVERT. Thank you. Thank you for giving us that

unique perspective on life on the International Space Station.

I am going to lead off with the questions since I believe we have

about 15 minutes before we link up with the Space Station.

So Dr. Whitson and Lieutenant Colonel Fincke, I think I will ask

the first question.

What kinds of lessons would you draw from your time on the

Space Station that you think could be applied to our next steps beyond Earth orbit or return to the Moon and then going to Mars?

And that question is for both of you.

Dr. WHITSON. Yeah. I will start by saying that during my mission, we hosted three different Shuttle flights, and they were all

very robotically-intensive missions with the installation of hardware elements on board the International Space Station, large

pieces of tress that filled the payload bay of the Shuttle, and so it

was really exciting to be a part of that process of using the Station

robotic arm, in one case of actually handing off one piece of hardware from one robotic arm to the other robotic arm for installation.

So that robotics capability is going to be something that is important to us even in our manned exploration to the Moon and Mars.

Chairman CALVERT. Turn on your mike.

Lieutenant Colonel FINCKE. There you go. Sorry about that. I can

fly a spacecraft, but I have got to learn how to do one of these.

On our mission, it was Expedition 9. It was the third mission of

only two people on board. Complete resupply from Russian cargo

ships. And we launched and landed on a Russian Soyuz, so it was

a bit different than Peggy’s mission. And we learned a few neat

things that are going to really help us go to Mars and back to the

Moon.

We are—we had problems with our oxygen generator, and we

learned how to work and fix things that we had not trained for on

the ground. We—Peggy was mentioning this medicine concept with

the ultrasound machine. Well, we were using tele-engineering to be

able to fix things that were broken. And that is an important lesson when we go to the Moon and Mars. We won’t be able to know

how to fix everything all by ourselves, but we have a strong team

back on our home planet that can help us.

And also, we learned how to fix our own space suits. That was

the first time we opened up an American space suit and changed

out parts. And that is the kind of thing we need to know when we

go to the Moon is how to fix our own space suits. So we became

more self-sufficient, but also more dependent on the ground to

count on them for—to help us to be able to do the things that we

could do while we were up in space.

22

Chairman CALVERT. Thank you.

Mr. Udall.

SAFE HAVEN

Mr. UDALL. As a follow-on to Chairman Calvert’s question, we

talked a lot about the aftermath of Columbia and the Accident Investigation Board. We talked about a safe haven at the Station.

Could you—both of you talked a little bit about what it would be

like if the Station served as a safe haven for the Shuttle. What

would be the challenges you would face, say if the Shuttle crew

were there for one to two months, hopefully no longer than that?

Dr. WHITSON. Actually, before we launch STS–114, the next

Shuttle to launch, we will understand how much capability in

terms of crew resupplies, oxygen, carbon dioxide removal, and food

that we will have on orbit. And we will have a plan in place on

how long we could withstand keeping that crew up there before we

could send a rescue mission. And there will actually be another

Shuttle on the pad ready to go within that time frame of when we

can support a crew on board the Station. So it is not ideal, obviously, but obviously we are not going to invoke the—that scenario

unless it is a serious situation.

RESOURCE CONSUMPTION

Mr. UDALL. Doctor, Lieutenant Colonel may respond as well,

what is the number—the resource that runs out first, is it oxygen?

Is it——

Dr. WHITSON. Well, actually it is oxygen, but we make the assumption that the electron, our oxygen-generating system is not

working. So it is a—kind of almost a worst case. We have taken

one failure already and said the electron was not working, and so

we are starting from that point.

Mr. UDALL. If it is working, is there an unlimited amount of oxygen available?

Dr. WHITSON. Then water becomes——

Mr. UDALL. Okay.

Dr. WHITSON.—inconsumable. We use water to break apart to

make the oxygen. So water then becomes a limiting consumable,

but——

Mr. UDALL. That’s your feed stock, the water is.

Dr. WHITSON. Yeah. Yeah.

Mr. UDALL. Okay. Interesting. Oxygen is in the water. Everything stems from water, doesn’t it?

Dr. WHITSON. Yeah.

Mr. UDALL. Did you want to say anything else, Lieutenant Colonel Fincke?

Lieutenant Colonel FINCKE. Certainly. I would like to add that

the Space Station right now is really designed, and has enough capability, for three people. To increase by—and we have two on

board. By increasing to six people, we are going to have to have all

of our systems running at full bore, all of our oxygen-generation

systems and the carbon dioxide-removal system and things like

that. And the engineers on the ground have really looked hard into

this and made some assumptions of—towards the worst case, and

23

we can definitely support—the Space Station can support for short

periods of time, enough time to get another Space Shuttle up there,

and that is good news for our friends in the astronaut corps.

Mr. UDALL. Even with the converter—the oxygen converter

down, two months is within the time frame?

Dr. WHITSON. Actually, I think the latest estimate they were

supposed to report that in the last couple of days, and I am sorry

I don’t know that number, but it is on the order of 30 days.

Mr. UDALL. Okay. What about space? I don’t hear you talking

about any problems with space in the Shuttle itself.

Dr. WHITSON. Well——

Mr. UDALL. More crowded?

Dr. WHITSON.—the Shuttle is actually very crowded normally,

but the Space Station will be much more crowded than it would be

normally, but——

Mr. UDALL. Yeah.

Dr. WHITSON.—it is six different modules on orbit, each of various size, but there is plenty of room for the seven Shuttle crew

members and an additional two Station crew members, if we needed to do that. And obviously this is a worst case scenario. This is

not a scenario that we would plan to do except for a scenario that

required it to save the lives of our crew members.

Mr. UDALL. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I want to give other

Members an opportunity, so thank you.

Chairman CALVERT. I thank the gentleman.

Mr. Bonner.

EFFECTS OF LONG-DURATION SPACE FLIGHT

Mr. BONNER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

I hope that the people who are in this hearing room, especially

those who might be viewing it today on C–SPAN, realize how historic this is that we have got the first witness before our committee

in Congress that is not here, but is in outer space.

Dr. Whitson, you were, as I recall from reading your biography,

in space for 184 days. That is a long time to be away from home.

And so much is made of these missions about the effects on our

body, the physical effect. What were the psychological issues that

you dealt with in space and then when you returned home that you

dealt with in returning home? And talk to us a little bit, please,

about the psychological aspects of space travel.

Dr. WHITSON. Well, I may be a little bit unique in that I loved

every minute on board the Space Station. It was a phenomenal experience to me being there I think probably because I had wanted

to do it since I had walked—watched the astronauts walk on the

Moon. I have always wanted to be an astronaut. When I graduated

from high school, it was the first year they selected female astronauts, and that is when I decided I wanted to be an astronaut.

Luckily for me, I didn’t know how hard it would be to get in, but

I got lucky and I made it. The psychological part of being in space

is actually probably less traumatic than the months and the years

actually leading up to it in the training process. We do about half

of our training in Russia, so we are away from our families a

month or two at a time back and forth. And so I think psychologically that is kind of the building block for families to build

24

those relationships to be able to withstand going to space for sixmonth periods of time. I tell my Expedition crew members in training, ‘‘This is the test. If you can make this work then being on

board the Station is so much easier, because once you get there,

you have such an interesting job, the best one off of this planet.’’

So we—I really enjoyed that experience. I think probably the only

long-lasting psychological impact that I have after returning to

Earth is that I really, really want to go back.

Mr. BONNER. Lieutenant Colonel.

Lieutenant Colonel FINCKE. I think Peggy is not unique in that

she enjoyed her 184 days. I enjoyed my 187 days I hope as much

as she did. It was an amazing experience on an amazing Space Station. There were only two of us on our mission and so there was

less company, but we got along great. My commander from Russia

and I, we got along. He spoke to me every day in English, and I

spoke to him in Russian. We saw each other eye to eye, and looking

outside at the beautiful planet below, we never really got grumpy,

because any time we felt anything sad or bad, we just looked outside. But we also had a space telephone, and we could call down

and keep in touch with our families. And while I was on board the

Space Station, my wife had our second child, our daughter, who

was born while I was up there, and this is not unique to service

families that are all over serving our country across the world, but

this was unique in that is the first time it happened to an astronaut in space. But I was able to talk to my wife up to the point

where labor was happening and keep in touch for those, you know,

days afterwards when we were happy as a couple to be able to, you

know, welcome our daughter into the world. And so a lot goes to

our families for supporting us while we are in training in Russia

and training—and flying in space. But the psychological aspects, it

felt like we weren’t that far away from home.

Mr. BONNER. If I may ask just a quick follow-up to both of you.

When most Americans travel away from home for 10 days or two

weeks and they get back home, the first thing they want to do is

have X or Y. What was it for you? Was it a Big Mac? Diet Coke?

Dr. WHITSON. For me, I wanted a steak and a salad.

Lieutenant Colonel FINCKE. And I was looking forward to my

mother-in-law’s cooking. She came all of the way out to Russia to

cook me a nice Indian meal.

Mr. BONNER. That is a very good, politically correct answer,

Lieutenant Colonel.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Chairman CALVERT. Thank you.

Mr. Bartlett.

NASA’S ROLE IN INSPIRING YOUTH

Mr. BARTLETT. I can remember very well when the Soviet Union

launched their first Sputnik. I can remember the excitement, October sky, watching that sky for the satellite to go over. I remember

when President Kennedy challenged the Nation to put a man on

the Moon within a decade. That was a big, big challenge, and we

did it in something less than a decade. I remember trying to stay

up at night to watch the video of the Moon landing. And somehow,

since the excitement of those days, space flight has become kind of

25

ho-hum, and it is because, I think, NASA has been so successful

that the American public has been led to believe that this is a pretty routine, unexciting thing. And there are two deficits that have

occurred because of that.

One is we aren’t able to get the kind of funding that we need for

NASA and our space programs, particularly our manned programs,

because they don’t have the excitement that they once had for the

American people.

The other deficiency is that we desperately need something in

our country that captures the imagination of our people and inspires our young people to go into careers of science, math, and engineering. Putting a man on the Moon really did that. I remember

a cartoon I saw, a little freckle-faced, bucktoothed kid. He said,

‘‘Six months ago, I couldn’t even spell engineer and now I are one.’’

You know, everybody wanted to be a part of that program.

It really is very hazardous duty. We have only—there is a one

chance in 50 you are—roughly one chance in 50 you are not going

to make it, if the past is going to predict the future in terms of our

space flights. Is that not correct, two out of 100 and some missions?

Is that right? And so what have we done, or what should we have

done differently so that it didn’t lose its luster, so that this was

still exciting, so that people were still riveted to their television

sets, so that our kids still wanted to be a scientist, mathematician,

or engineer, or an astronaut? And you know, we are paying for that

as a nation now because we have far too few of our kids going into

those disciplines. How did we fail, and what do we need to do now

so that we can recoup?

Dr. WHITSON. Well, that is a pretty big question, and I wish I

had the answer in my back pocket on that one.

I am not sure how we failed. I do think it is just as critically important now as it was in the 1960s. I mean, I was inspired. But

every time I go out to talk to young school children, you know, I

feel it is my job to at least convince one of those young people that

they can do something that they didn’t think they could before I

came.

Lieutenant Colonel FINCKE. One of NASA’s three main mission

statements is to inspire the next generation of explorers, as only

NASA can. And I would certainly hate to be a witness and disagree

with you, sir, but every school that I have gone to, and since I have

come back from space I have talked to over 16,000 school kids

across our country, and I haven’t found anybody that was not interested in space and not interested in what we did aboard the Space

Station and who didn’t laugh when the Commander’s hair stuck up

and watching us play with our food and all of the joy and wonder

and imagination to go fly in space. And I think that imagination

is still among our youth, and it is just up to us to just close the

loop and let them know that, you know, America is the land of opportunity and you, too, can be an astronaut or an engineer or a

mommy or a daddy or whatever it is that you want to be when you

grow up, because this is the place where dreams come true. And

I think NASA is doing that.

Mr. BARTLETT. But it would be nice if we could translate that excitement that you generate in the classroom to more of our kids

going into science, math, and engineering, because it is not hapVerDate 11-MAY-2000 07:13 Dec 08, 2005 Jkt 021710 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 C:\WORKD\SA05\061405\21710 SCIENCE1 PsN: SCIENCE1
26

pening, and that is our challenge. You go to our schools, like technical schools, and more than half of the students there are foreign

nationals. And our country—our companies now are wanting more

immigrants to come in because they can’t find enough scientists,

mathematicians, and engineers in this country.

So you know, thank you for inspiring our school children. I hope

that it is reflected with an increased number of our young people

going into these careers.

For the short-term, it threatens our economic superiority. For the

long-term, it threatens our military superiority. We have got to

have adequate numbers of bright young people going into science,

math, and engineering. And you all are voices that are helping us

do that. Thank you very much for the contribution that you are

making.

LANGUAGE BARRIERS

Chairman CALVERT. I see we have been joined by our friend from

Louisiana. If you would like to ask a question before we tune into

our friend in outer space—well, I am just going to—we still have

a few minutes, so I am going to ask a question.

I was listening to Colonel Fincke when we were talking about

use of language. Is that much of a barrier? Is that a significant

issue when you are up there in outer space? Do you understand

each other pretty well or—I guess my question is, is everybody taking—at NASA, is everybody learning Russian and everybody in the

Russian astronaut corps learning English?

Lieutenant Colonel FINCKE. Well, Mr. Chairman, like in any organization, communication is fundamental to mission success.

Chairman CALVERT. You have a point. I have a hard time understanding some of the members I serve with here, so——

Lieutenant Colonel FINCKE. And really, that is—so whatever language it takes, we have learned to communicate with each other

on board. And we have learned to communicate with the long partnership with Russia to communicate with each other. And sometimes, like any other organization, the communication isn’t perfect,

but I think, for the most part, we really understand each other.

And that is really fundamentally why things aboard the Space Station are a success is because we have good, solid working relationships. We know each other’s strengths and weaknesses, and we

have built off of that and have worked together as a team. Now it

is not a perfect team. Sometimes there is a little bit of grumbling

and the press loves to talk about that, but if you look at it right

now, and you are going to see, you know. Dr. Phillips is up there

with Sergei Krikalev working together in space, and that is a really

nice symbol for all of us to see people working together.

Chairman CALVERT. Any add-on to that, Doctor?

Dr. WHITSON. Well, I would just like to say that in addition to

the interpersonal requirements of doing something like building

the International Space Station, there is also an incredible engineering level of interaction that is required. I think it is somewhat

miraculous that we have done such an incredible job building the

Space Station. As was mentioned a little bit earlier, sometimes we

maybe make it look a little too easy. It really is quite miraculous

that we have gotten all of these pieces together.

27

SPACE SUITS

Chairman CALVERT. Quite an engineering feat. I always—people

ask me why do you have two different space suits when you are

up there? Is that make—does everything match up when you have

the cosmonaut in one space suit and the Americans, of course, in

our own space suit?

Dr. WHITSON. For any given EVA, we use the same space suit,

but there are some tasks that we do on the U.S. side that we use

the U.S. space suit for and some on the Russian side. Mike has a

unique perspective on that from his real life experience.

Lieutenant Colonel FINCKE. By having two sets of things, the redundancy it makes our engineering plan—to give us success. In

other words, we were getting ready to go outside in American space

suits, and we were going through a dress rehearsal, and it turns

out that his American space suit was broken. We ended up fixing

it by the end of the mission, but because we had a spare set of

space suits built by the Russians, they didn’t have the same problem, and we were able to go up just a week or two later in the Russian space suits and accomplish the task. And that just goes to

show having strength of a partnership and having the redundancy

aboard the Space Station is teaching us those lessons that we need

to so when we go back to the Moon and Mars we are taking note

of all of this.

Chairman CALVERT. Great. Well, I understand that we are getting down to about the—at about one minute. So I will ask Mr.

Udall if you want to ask anything in the minute we have remaining?

RADIATION

Mr. UDALL. Talk a little bit, if you will, about the radiation concerns on the Station and what you do about it, and if we have any

more time, what we project out on the Moon or on Mars when it

comes to radiation exposure.

Dr. WHITSON. On board the Space Station itself, we actually have

radiation monitoring hardware with alarm systems that will tell

the crew if it is getting into a hazardous level. But before that ever

happens, the ground typically will warn the crew that we anticipate that the radiation levels will go higher at a certain point in

time and recommend that they would go——

Chairman CALVERT. If I may interrupt, I think we are ready to

go.

Doctor, I think you need to connect with the Station.

Dr. WHITSON. Station, this is Peggy with the Subcommittee on

Space and Aeronautics. How do you read?

[No response.]

Dr. WHITSON. John, this is Peggy with the Subcommittee, how do

you read?

[No response.]

Dr. WHITSON. John? John, this is Peggy, how do you read?

[No response.]

Dr. WHITSON. There you are talking to him on the other channel.

Dr. PHILLIPS. Very good.

28

Dr. WHITSON. We have you loud and clear. How do you read us,

John?

Dr. PHILLIPS. I hear you, Peg.

Dr. WHITSON. Okay. Great. I am going to hand you over to

Chairman——

Dr. PHILLIPS. Loud and clear.

Dr. WHITSON. Excellent. We are going to hand you over to Chairman Calvert now.

LESSONS LEARNED FOR LONG-DURATION SPACE FLIGHT

(CONT.)

Chairman CALVERT. And now we go live from space, International Space Station, with Dr. John Phillips.

Doctor, I asked the same question to your two colleagues. I want

to ask you the same question that I asked them. What kinds of lessons would you draw from your time on the Space Station that you

think could be applied to our next steps beyond Earth orbit and for

our return to the Moon and then going on to Mars?

Dr. PHILLIPS. Yes, sir. First, welcome aboard the International

Space Station. It is my pleasure to welcome aboard the ladies and

gentlemen of the House Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics.

Since I am a former Navy guy, I feel an obligation to welcome you

aboard.

I appreciate the opportunity to talk.

Well, I have been here about two months now, and I have

learned lessons, and we have learned lessons every day. And I

would like to emphasize that up here on the International Space

Station, we are the experiment, not only we, the crew, but the vehicle, the equipment on it, our operations concept, our mission control operations, and even our international partnership. And I—

what I have learned, I believe, is that we need to build equipment

with as much attention to the low maintenance, as much attention

to reliability as possible, and we need to keep doing what we are

doing with our multiple layers of redundancy. We take safety very

seriously, and we build things with an eye to a redundancy, multiple pipelines, multiple equipment that does the same thing. And

if one thing fails, we have got another to back it up. And I think

we have used that approach to very good success on the Space Station, and I want to see us keep doing it in the future in our next

missions as well.

Chairman CALVERT. I thank the gentleman for his answer, and

I will move on to our—to Mr. Udall who leads the Minority, from

Colorado.

Mr. UDALL. Dr. Phillips, this is Mark Udall. I represent a portion

of Colorado, including half the ski areas. I am sure you can see all

of the snow in Colorado that we have had over the winter, which

means great water supplies for my friend from California and others in the southwest.

Chairman CALVERT. Thank you.

29

ISS AND THE VIEW OF EARTH

Mr. UDALL. Wax philosophical and talk a little bit about what

the view is like both looking into space as well as back at the

Earth.

Dr. PHILLIPS. Well, as luck would have it, we traveled over Colorado a couple of hours ago, and I shot some pictures starting from

the Sawtooth Mountains in Idaho and then down through Wyoming

and across the front range in Colorado, and it was very beautiful,

and I can see here that you had a good snow year.

The view is incredible from up here. And by the way, right now,

we are moving southeast, more or less parallel to the coast of California in the north Pacific. We will be heading down along the

Baja. The view is incredible. We get the white snow and the blue

oceans and the tan deserts and the green forests, and what it

brings home to me is that we are a pretty small planet, we are all

one people, and we need to conserve the resources we have, and

make sure we work together to make this place a livable for many

generations to come.

Chairman CALVERT. I thank the gentleman.

Mr. Bonner, you are recognized for two minutes.

Mr. BONNER. Dr. Phillips, my name is Joe Bonner, and I am from

Mobile, Alabama, and my home state is very proud of its role in

manned space flights.

The Chairman has only given us two minutes to ask our question, and normally those of us from the South, it takes two minutes

just to get our name out, so my question to you is very brief. After

all of your training and preparation and now that you are there,

what was your biggest surprise being on board the Space Station

and living in outer space?

Dr. PHILLIPS. Well, I think my biggest surprise up here, and I

have been here, by the way, once before on a shorter Shuttle flight,

my biggest surprise I think was how much work goes into the preparation for visiting vehicles. For example, just 15 minutes ago,

Commander Russian cosmonaut Sergei Krikalev, closed the hatch

on a Russian supply ship, about to say goodbye to that ship, and

then we are going to get another one in a couple days. And it takes

a lot of work to pack that Progress vehicle with the stuff we don’t

need anymore and to unpack, and then as soon as we get the new

one aboard in just a few days, then we are going to start in earnest

preparing to support the launch of the Shuttle Discovery and its

mission to dock here on Station. And that is just a whole lot of

work, and for a couple weeks, it really dominates our activities up

here.

Chairman CALVERT. I thank the gentleman.

The gentleman from Louisiana, Mr. Melancon.

Mr. MELANCON. My only question, and this is Congressman

Charlie Melancon from Louisiana, is are your feet strapped down

so you are not floating?

Dr. PHILLIPS. Yes, sir. They are not—well, they are not strapped

down. Right now, I am not wearing any shoes. We only wear shoes,

pretty much, for exercise, but I have got my stocking clad feet

tucked under a railing on the floor, because if I didn’t do that, I

would just kind of float around like this.

30

Mr. MELANCON. That is what I was talking about.

Thank you.

Chairman CALVERT. I thank the gentleman.

The gentleman from Maryland, Mr. Bartlett.

ISS ORBIT

Mr. BARTLETT. Hi, this is Roscoe Bartlett from Maryland.

Could you tell us what type of an orbit you are in, the altitude

and the parts of the world that you see from your orbit?

Dr. PHILLIPS. Sir, we are in nearly a circular orbit at a speed of

about eight kilometers per second at an altitude of 350 kilometers

right now. That is near the lower range of our orbit. Sometimes it

is a bit higher. It takes us about 90 minutes to go around the

Earth. And we are in an orbital inclination of 51.6 degrees, which

is dictated by the fact that basically half of the Station plus our

Russian Soyuz vehicle and supply vehicles are launched from base

in central Asia that, for various orbital reasons, needs to launch to

that inclination. And what that means is we see all of the Earth,

the low latitudes of maybe a little bit higher than our inclination,

maybe about 55 or 57 degrees. We can see that far north and that

far south. And actually my crewmate, Sergei Krikalev, is taking

pictures of his hometown of St. Petersburg, which is nearly at 60

degrees.

Chairman CALVERT. I thank the gentleman.

Mr. Costa from California.

ISS COMPLETION

Mr. COSTA. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.

Congressman Jim Costa from California from Fresno.

Dr. Phillips, obviously we are pleased that you could be here

today for this presentation. You know, oftentimes the question is

asked for what purpose is the Space Station. When we look at our

nation’s budget priorities and we look at our nation’s priorities with

regard to our space program, both the manned and the unmanned

space program, today, as you sit there from your vantagepoint,

what percentage of the Space Station is completed? And when it is

completed in its entirety, what do you believe the capabilities of the

Space Station will be as we try to answer the question toward

these priorities?

Dr. PHILLIPS. Well, thanks for your question, sir, and by the way,

I used to, I believe, live in your District down in the Navy base of

Lemoore, California.

Mr. COSTA. It is a great Navy station.

Dr. PHILLIPS. I have fond memories of that place.

Mr. COSTA. I hope you are still registered to vote there.

Dr. PHILLIPS. And I would guess that the Station is maybe a little over half completed. I am just making up—we have got some

more large pressurized modules to build. There is a laboratory from

Europe and a laboratory from Japan. And excuse me, I just said

the wrong thing. They are already built, but we have some more

pressurized modules to launch. And then we have got a lot of other

big pieces waiting at Kennedy Space Center right now for the resumption of Shuttle flight.

31

Eventually, we expect to have a crew of six up here, and right

now, with Sergei and I with a crew of two, much of our work—although we are doing scientific experimentation as well. When there

are six people on board, there will be a lot more scientific experimentation, experimentation designed to advance our knowledge in

combustion, and material science, in biology, and I believe most importantly, just to advance our knowledge in how to push further

into space.

I would like to mention that the International Space Station is

maintaining our presence in space and maintaining our national

credibility as a worthy partner in an international technical

project. We constantly learn new lessons up here about hardware,

software. The experiences we gather up here that will enable us to

establish a long-term station on the Moon and to go on to Mars.

Mr. COSTA. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.

Chairman CALVERT. Thank you.

Mr. Rohrabacher.

ISS RESEARCH ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Mr. ROHRABACHER. Hello. I am Congressman Dana Rohrabacher

from California, Huntington Beach, California. And greetings.

Okay. I will proceed.

We have learned a lot about human habitation of space by what

we have done at the Space Station and by you and others who have

spent time there. You are right there right now. Could you tell us

if you believe that there is any further commercial potential for

Space Station? And number two, you mentioned the research potential a few moments ago. Could you go into some specific detail

about what type of accomplishments—research accomplishments

we could expect if we continue supporting the Station?

Dr. PHILLIPS. Well, sir, as I mentioned, right now our experimental time is somewhat limited, but I am going to give you an

example of an experiment we are working with. It is called advanced diagnostic ultrasound in microgravity. Now this experiment

uses medical ultrasound and high data—plus a team of specialists

on the ground to enable non-specialists like me to provide state-ofthe-art diagnostic imaging of heart, lungs, abdomen, and arteries.

This has great potential for use in remote areas in places where

you don’t have diagnostic specialists and for military uses on battlefield diagnostics, for example. That is an example of one kind of

experiment we are going to do—we are doing up here now. When

we have three full operational laboratories, the Japanese, European, and American laboratory up here with teams of scientists

working in those labs pretty much full time, I believe we will have

the potential for advancements in pharmaceuticals, for example,

and we have pharmaceutical research going on right now, and also

material science. I think those are the two biggest areas. It is hard

for me to put—to predict the kind of results of these things, but

I want to emphasize once more that from my perspective, the most

important thing up here is that we are the experiment. We are

learning how to fly in space.

Mr. ROHRABACHER. Thank you very much.

Chairman CALVERT. Thank you very much.

32

Mr. Miller, I think we are going to break up, but try to get as

much in as you can.

THE IMPACT ON ISS FROM THE SHUTTLE GROUNDING

Mr. MILLER. Yes, this is Brad Miller from North Carolina.

What has been the impact on your mission of the grounding of

the Shuttle fleet? Has that affected your procedures in any way?

Dr. PHILLIPS. I would describe the gravity of the Shuttle fleet in

sort—first and foremost, the assembly, as I have mentioned, there

are tresses, solar rays, and new pressurized modules as well as a

lot of laboratory equipment and spare parts waiting at Kennedy

Space Center in Florida to be launched. Two of the modules scheduled for launch in the next couple of years are laboratories that belong to Japan and Europe.

The second impact, the use of ISS has been limited to two persons since the Columbia accident with the limitations on delivery

of consumables, such as oxygen, water, and food.

Third, although our Russian partners have done an admirable

job in keeping the Station supplied, without the Shuttle, we have

been operating on somewhat—there are certain spare parts that

can only be delivered by the Shuttle, plus only the Shuttle has the

capability of carrying large cargo back to Earth. So we are really

looking forward to seeing the Discovery about a month from now.

Chairman CALVERT. I thank the gentleman.

Mr. Green.

RUSSIAN COOPERATION

Mr. GREEN. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Dr. Phillips, I had the good fortune about two weeks ago to be

in Russia and to meet with the Deputy Head of the space agency.

One of the things that we talked about was the great spirit of cooperation that has been engendered as a result of this noble mission that you find yourself a part of. Could you kindly make some

comments about the spirit of cooperation that has manifested itself

as you go about your business there in the outer part of our world?

Dr. PHILLIPS. Speaking from the standpoint of an astronaut, not

a manager, not a negotiator, I would say that cooperation is wonderful. I have got my crewmate, Sergei Krikalev, 10 feet away from

me right now. We work together and live together. We did about

50 percent of our training in the United States and 50 percent in

Russia, and it is almost a situation without boundaries. We go from

one to the other, trained equally well. And we—just this morning,

we have both been talking to our mission control center in Houston, our mission—our American payload center in Huntsville, Alabama, and our mission control center in Moscow. So I think, from

an operational standpoint, our two countries have really merged

their programs very, very well. And I can’t really speak to the diplomatic and financial negotiation end of it, because that is way

above my pay grade.

Chairman CALVERT. I thank the gentleman.

Ms. Jackson Lee, any last questions?

33

SAFETY

Ms. JACKSON LEE. Thank you.

Congresswoman Jackson Lee from Houston, Texas. Johnson

Space Center is in our neighborhood.

Thank you for your service.

My question is how comfortable are you with the safety record

of the International Space Station and are you seeing improvement

in the safety review and, of course, the quality of safety on the Station?

Thank you.

Dr. PHILLIPS. I have always been confident about the quality of

safety up here. We take safety very seriously. We safeguard our

health through an exercise program involving bikes, treadmills, resistive devices. We have multiple levels of redundancy. I think one

of the lessons that was brought home from the Columbia accident

is that we have got to stamp out complacency wherever we find it.

We have got to remember that this is a risky business, not like getting on an airliner. We strap ourselves on rockets, and it still has

some risks. I think our safety record on the Station has been good

since the onset, and I think it is continuing to improve.

Chairman CALVERT. I want to thank you, Doctor, for your hospitality and allowing us to visit with you up there in outer space and

for answering our questions. We have about 10 seconds left, so I

wanted to say goodbye, and would love it if you said goodbye to us,

too. Be safe.

Dr. PHILLIPS. I thank you very much, sir. And it has been a

pleasure talking to the ladies and gentleman of the Committee,

from the testing module in the American laboratory aboard the

International Space Station, I hope you have a wonderful day down

there in Washington. The weather is great up here.

Chairman CALVERT. It is probably clearer there than it is here.

Thank you. God bless, and I guess we are out.

Dr. PHILLIPS. Thank you very much, sir. International Space Station out.

JOHNSON SPACE CENTER. Station, this is Houston ACR. That concludes the event.

Chairman CALVERT. Well, that was exciting.

Mr. Udall, you are recognized for a question.

RESEARCH ABOARD THE ISS

Mr. UDALL. Would you talk a little bit more about the research

possibilities as well as, perhaps, some of the experiments you conducted and some of the lessons that you have learned, Dr. Whitson,

Lieutenant Colonel?

Dr. WHITSON. Sure, I think John introduced it very well. Sometimes it is very hard for us to predict what the outcome is and

what will be the best research to do on board the Station. That is

true of research here on the ground as well. Sometimes the most

interesting questions are, ‘‘I wonder why that happened.’’ But I

think, you know, there is a lot of potential. I had the opportunity

to work on zeolite crystal formations. Zeolites are used in petroleum processing and in pollution control, and we actually used

them on board the Space Station as part of our carbon dioxide reVerDate 11-MAY-2000 07:13 Dec 08, 2005 Jkt 021710 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 C:\WORKD\SA05\061405\21710 SCIENCE1 PsN: SCIENCE1
34

moval system. I had the opportunity to melt superconductor crystals under different conditions to try and optimize crystal growth

and get the biggest superconductor crystals possible. And John

talked about the—ultrasound is another one that obviously also

has direct ground applications as well.

Anything to add, Michael?

Lieutenant Colonel FINCKE. One thing there was a big difference

between Dr. Whitson’s mission and the one I was on was they—

we didn’t have as much cargo mass up and cargo mass down, so

even though we could have done some really very interesting experiments, we couldn’t bring down all of the results. So we have

learned, during the two-person crew post-Columbia missions of how

to send down video at higher qualities. We have learned how to

do—make due with the experimental materials we have on board

and to do research that way and to also get the high-quality results

down without actually having to send down the pieces, the experimental samples themselves. However, when the Space Shuttle

starts flying again, and it is going to fly again soon, it is going to

represent a big boom in the capabilities of science, because we will

be able to take up a whole bunch of experiments that have been

waiting and bring down the experimental results that are on board

right now.

RADIATION

Mr. UDALL. If I could, I would like to go back to the radiation

question that we—but I do want to just mention that I thought Dr.

Phillips and you—both of you have been very compelling in pointing out that the whole enterprise is an experiment. Sometimes we

are looking for these specific outcomes, but just the fact that we are

there and have been there for as long as we have been there is a

case and a story we ought to continue to tell. It is pretty remarkable what we have succeeded in doing.

The—I have read concerns expressed on the radiation question

that it is still undetermined to what extent we can live on a place

like the Moon or Mars given the potential radiation exposures. You

were talking a little bit about the Station and what you do. You

have suits that you put on and so on when there would be radiation episodes. But would you just talk in the two minutes we have

remaining about the radiation and your concerns?

Dr. WHITSON. Sure. As I mentioned, we have procedures on

board to minimize the effects of the crew, but the magnetosphere

of the Earth actually provides a lot of radiation protection to us,

so even understanding this, we have to take it another level up to

understand the risks that we are going to be taking on the Moon

and on Mars. And radiation shielding is going to be one of the important factors in whatever vehicles we develop, whatever modules

we have, you know. We may have to—we may choose to do safe havens, you know, within a small compartment area, because that

might be logistically easier to accomplish. So—but we do have to

do some sort of radiation protection in our future missions. It is

going to be critical, because it is a much higher radiation level outside the Earth’s magnetosphere. And even in 250 miles, we are still

protected, even though it is much higher than it is here in Washington, DC.

35

Mr. UDALL. There might be some people saying there is a lot of

radiation in this town, but Lieutenant Colonel.

Lieutenant Colonel FINCKE. Once we get on to a planetary surface, and that is the trick, we can actually use some of the resources there. We can—I don’t want to say live underground on the

Moon, but we can use some of the lunar regolith, the soil that is

there, and use it to help protect us. And some of the tricks that

we are going to learn on the Moon are going to be applicable to

Mars, because Mars doesn’t have a magnetosphere to protect it like

we do here on planet Earth. So there are a lot of tricks and a lot

of neat things that we don’t even completely understand now, but

we are going to understand as we take this voyage together.

Mr. UDALL. The experiment would continue on the Moon?

Dr. WHITSON. Exactly.

Mr. UDALL. Thank you very much. Again, I am in awe of your

service and your commitment to pushing the envelope, looking out

over the horizon. Thank you.

Chairman CALVERT. I thank the gentleman.

Mr. Bonner.

BENEFITS OF HUMAN SPACE FLIGHT

Mr. BONNER. Mr. Chairman, thank you.

I would like to follow-up with the question that Congressman

Bartlett asked both of you but phrase it a little bit differently.

Clearly, I grew up watching Apollo as well. It was a communitywide event. We would all go to the house that had the color TV,

if we were fortunate enough to have one in our town, to sit and

watch, as a community and as a nation and as a world, in awe of

what was happening. And perhaps because you all were so successful and your predecessors were so successful, we did begin to take

things for granted until tragedy came our way.

I guess my question to you is, there are a lot of media here, this

is being broadcast on C–SPAN. You have got four minutes and 16

seconds to give a PSA on the advances in arthritis, the advances

in aging, advances in kidney stone that NASA has played a role in

helping our physicians, our scientists, our engineers here on Earth

make big progress up in space.

Dr. WHITSON. Well, it is always kind of awesome to try and think

about all of the different things that we have actually had input

into in terms of sensor technologies that applied in medical scenarios. But one of the more interesting stories I always like to tell

is the one about the development of the artificial assisted heart

pump, because that developed because they needed a mechanism to

reduce the bubbling flow in the artificial hearts. And they used

similar technologies that we used in the engines on the Shuttle.

And so it is actually a very indirect application of some engineering

thing that we learned to go to space that was applied to people’s—

saving people’s lives and giving them an artificial heart until they

could get a transplant.

So there are just some really interesting stories out there. I hope

that some of the experiments that I was involved in will have some

potential payoff in the future. I think in particular, on my study,

on the renal stones, we are interested in applying something that

36

we know here on Earth and hopefully maybe there will be some

payback later on after we have tested it in zero gravity as well.

Lieutenant Colonel FINCKE. I am a pretty healthy guy, but

aboard the Space Station for 187 days and 24 hours—21 hours, I

lost a fair amount of bone mass, roughly about six percent, and I

exercised a lot. In fact, that is what we have seen with humans in

space is we lose, without gravity, now matter how hard we exercise, somewhere between one and two percent of our bone mass per

month. Now that is accelerated osteoporosis. And by understanding

that—and fortunately it all came back for me, but by understanding how we lose it, the mechanisms, and how we can get it

back, is very important to a lot of our population who are suffering

with osteoporosis right now. There is a direct tie. We—on our mission, we were the first mission to actually image our bones as they

changed over time with this ultrasound machine that we have been

mentioning. So these are some direct applications to the science of

osteoporosis.

But space is definitely an investment in the country’s future.

When I was up there, I saw four hurricanes—or actually, I saw

them all last summer, and John is going to see, unfortunately,

some this year. But it—I always reflected that we lost very few

people’s lives, especially American lives, because of the space program. We knew ahead of time that these hurricanes were coming.

Back in the 1940s and 1950s, you would only get 18 hours. Now

we let people know when hurricanes are coming days in advance.

They have a chance to pack up their stuff and move if they need

to or batten down wherever they need to. So this space technology

is protecting lives every day, especially during the summer hurricane season on planet Earth.

Mr. BONNER. Well, as someone who experienced one of those hurricanes in my back yard, I want to thank you, because that is a

very good point. We were able to, with advanced notice, avoid the

loss of life that we saw, for instance, in the tsunami. So thank you

both for what you do and for what you have done.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Chairman CALVERT. I thank the gentleman.

Mr. Costa.

ISS CONFIGURATION AND SCHEDULE

Mr. COSTA. Thank you very much. And I am not sure if this

question is appropriately addressed to Dr. Whitson or Lieutenant

Colonel Fincke. What I asked Dr. Phillips about the level of completion of the Space Station currently, I thought he said approximately 40 percent plus. What is the exact level of completion currently today? And it goes to my larger question that is under the

timeline that we are currently looking at when the—hopefully the

Shuttle becomes operative again here in the next couple of months,

when do we believe that we will be able to complete the Space Station to then have the full complement of the six persons on the Station and to be able to take advantage of all of the capacity that is—

we hope is built into the Station to perform not only the science

but the additional research that has been contemplated?

Dr. WHITSON. It will take approximately six Shuttle flights to

complete the assembly of the truss element, which holds the solar

37

rays on either end. And that capability will allow us to add on the

different laboratory—the two additional laboratory modules and

then connecting node modules. So there will be three more additional large modules in addition to the six already on orbit.

Mr. COSTA. So that is nine Shuttle flights?

Dr. WHITSON. Yes.

Mr. COSTA. Okay.

Dr. WHITSON. Yes.

Mr. COSTA. Over what length of time?

Dr. WHITSON. Well, the Shuttle assembly rate is something that

I think a lot of folks are working on now, and we will do whatever

we feel is safe and——

Mr. COSTA. I understand that part. Yeah.

Dr. WHITSON. Well, we anticipate that we will also be having to

provide the resupply. As John mentioned, we have very limited resource capability. The Russian Progress vehicles have provided a

lot of resupply capability, but if we want to increase the crew size,

we are going to be required to provide resupply missions as well.

Mr. COSTA. So it sounds like approximately 14 or 15 Shuttle

flights.

Dr. WHITSON. Well, I think we will take that question for the

record and get you an official answer on that.

Mr. COSTA. And if we are doing how many a year—we hope to

be doing a year——

Dr. WHITSON. Hopefully——

Mr. COSTA. Six?

Dr. WHITSON. Yeah, five to six would be, I think, a good estimate, but I think there is a lot of——

Mr. COSTA. So we are talking about a three- to four-year period,

at least, to complete the Station?

Dr. WHITSON. At least, yes.

Mr. COSTA. Once we become operational with Shuttle. And then

after it is complete, how long do we believe that the Station will

be able to perform at that level?

Dr. WHITSON. Well, it is going to depend a lot on the maintenance resupply capability that we have provided at that point, because we will have to provide capability to repair the hardware on

orbit.

Mr. COSTA. And do you have cost estimates?

Dr. WHITSON. I am not familiar with——

Mr. COSTA. Okay.

Dr. WHITSON.—those numbers.

Mr. COSTA. I would like to submit that, for the record, Mr. Chairman, as well.

Chairman CALVERT. Without objection.

Mr. COSTA. Thank you. I defer—yield the balance of my time.

Chairman CALVERT. I thank the gentleman.

Mr. Rohrabacher.

ISS RESUPPLY

Mr. ROHRABACHER. Well, let us hope we aren’t that dependent on

the Shuttle, because at $1 billion a flight, I guess that would mean

we are not going anywhere. But when we talk about resupply, we

38

are not really thinking that the Shuttle is going to be the instrument for resupply, are we?

Dr. WHITSON. We can take that question for the record, too, but

I think there are lots of different plans out there for alternatives.

With the ATV module being built by the Europeans and the HTV

module being built by the Japanese, we have lots of options.

Mr. ROHRABACHER. Realizing that perhaps these nine flights that

you spoke about, for the completion of Space Station, that is the

only vehicle we have that can handle that kind of load, but when

it comes to resupply, might not the private sector be able to be contracted in other craft that cost us less than $1 billion a flight, not

counting what the cargo is that is in there? Might we go to that

direction and be able to do more with less?

Dr. WHITSON. And we will take that question for the record, also,

but I do know that the program is working on various alternatives

that do include commercial resupply.

Mr. ROHRABACHER. All right. And about your bone loss, six percent. You lost six percent of your bone mass when you were—would

that also happen on the Moon?

Lieutenant Colonel FINCKE. Well, the—sir, we are not exactly

sure. We think it will be diminished on the Moon, because there

is gravity. Gravity on the Moon is roughly about one-sixth on the

Earth, and we think that the reason why we are losing some of

that kind of bone is because we are not stimulating our muscles

and our bone by walking. And that is mainly where we lose it is

in our hips. And so by having a chance to walk on the Moon, we

may be able to trick our bodies into thinking to get more—to continue, but we don’t know that for sure. But when we go to the

Moon, that is definitely, I think, one of the things we will learn.

And the gravity on Mars is one-third, so maybe there is another

equation there.

RESUPPLY: ISS VS. MOON

Mr. ROHRABACHER. Well, like we say, we have—the most—one of

the most important contributions of Space Stations is learning

about how to live in space, and this is our first step of humankind

living in space. The next step we see, the President has outlined

this plan very well, and I, of course, commend the Administration

on—finally, after so long, in so many years presenting to us a strategy, a long-term strategy. The President’s next step in his strategy

for space is the Moon. And when we talked about resupply for the

Station, how expensive it is, would resupply for a Moon mission,

how would that compare to the cost for resupply for people who are

in Station?

Dr. WHITSON. Well, I am not dealing with the budget numbers

on that, but I think what this opportunity offers us is the lessons

we have learned that we have to build hardware at a much higher

level of maintainability, you know. Our requirements for resupply

have to be reduced. We can’t support Moon or Mars missions at the

same re-supply level that we are doing currently. And I think that

is an important lesson. And where we can try and reduce that is

something that we are practicing on board the Station every day.

Mr. ROHRABACHER. So we might be trying to find things on the

Moon that we could actually generate power from or find water

39

sources, et cetera? We can talk—I am sure we will—as this goes

on, we will be having hearings about the potential of water on the

Moon and other resources, but we are looking——

Chairman CALVERT. So we can export it to California.

Mr. ROHRABACHER. That would be good. This is the man who

made sure we had water for the last six years.

Lieutenant Colonel FINCKE. But if I may add, it is that there is

a lot of oxygen that is connected in the regolith, the soil on the

Moon. And right now, in kind of like an X–Prize, NASA has set out

this new program where we are offering a reward for the cleaver

team that can figure out how to use, perhaps, like solar energy and

get that oxygen that is trapped in the minerals on the Moon so

that we won’t need to send up oxygen, that we would be able to

use the resources on the Moon. So NASA is trying to be innovative

in trying to figure out how we can live off the land as best we can.

Mr. ROHRABACHER. That is just the type of creative approach

that we are applauding your new Director for, and we expect to see

more of that from him and are very happy that—when people come

up with those kinds of ideas, because the cost to resupply, we can’t

be spending $1 billion a flight for the Shuttle and expect us to have

a space program all based on $1 billion a flight, and that’s just the

cost of the transportation. We have got to get these costs under

control and find some creative ways of accomplishing the mission

in a more cost-effective way.

So thanks for throwing that in, Colonel, and thank you very

much, Mr. Chairman.

Chairman CALVERT. I thank the gentleman.

Mr. Wu, from Oregon. We will try to get some water out of you,

too.

ISS CONFIGURATION AND SHUTTLE LAUNCH RATES

Mr. WU. Well, we Oregonians think that California ought to be

able to get all of the water that California wants. We will just peg

it to the price of a gallon of gasoline, and we are happy to sell however much California can buy, Mr. Chairman.

I want to follow up on the questioning of Mr. Rohrabacher and

Mr. Costa. I was just doing, you know, a quick back-of-the-envelop

calculation based on Dr. Whitson’s answers about how many lift

missions it would take to complete the International Space Station,

and then—well, it seems to me that if you count up the number

of missions and the mission rate, assuming five or six missions per

year, we are pretty much hard up against the 2010 retirement date

that the Administrator has said. Is that roughly correct?

Dr. WHITSON. Well, 2010 is the date that we are working to, and

there are groups that are now doing assessments and analyzing

what would be the best final configuration for the Station. And so

I think you will be getting some answers from NASA later in the

summer on what that configuration will be and how we could do

that.

Mr. WU. But what I am concerned about the 2010 constraint

being something that, A, shapes the International Space Station,

whether that would be an appropriate or inappropriate limitation

on the International Space Station, and B, that the 2010 date,

aside from its effect on the International Space Station, also beVerDate 11-MAY-2000 07:13 Dec 08, 2005 Jkt 021710 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 C:\WORKD\SA05\061405\21710 SCIENCE1 PsN: SCIENCE1
40

comes a push date for the crew exploration vehicle. And in my

readback of the history of the space program in the 1960s is that

because we were in a race with the Russians, the types of vehicles

that we used took a certain shape, and that became a limitation

of you all going forward, because we were in a hurry. And I am

concerned that the same kind of hurry about the crew exploration

vehicle will perhaps be a limitation on that vehicle going forward.

Chairman CALVERT. I might point out to the gentleman that the

astronaut corps is probably not prepared to answer policy questions, but I appreciate the gentleman asking.

Mr. WU. Well, one thing that I have found is that if you ask

lower in the organization, sometimes the people doing the rowing

will give you more accurate answers than the people who are

trained to deal with the public, if you will.

Dr. WHITSON. Well, I definitely think there is another group that

is working on the crew—our new crew vehicle, and they are trying

to take all of those lessons that we learned in the early programs

into account and trying to make fewer mistakes. That is part of our

hope and goal is to make fewer mistakes than we made the first

time around and to come out more successful than we have even

in the past. So I anticipate that NASA will have a plan for you

later this summer on what we think we will be able to do.

Mr. WU. Well, Lieutenant Colonel Fincke, Dr. Whitson, Mr.

Chairman, I want to support your efforts fully, but I also want to

state for the record that I am concerned about artificial constraints,

be they of a date or other nature, and how those constraints can

shape the Space Station or shape future space exploration. And I

just want to lay that out there, not as an item of concern for you

all, but as, really, an item of support for what your mission should

be in the long-term is if there is anything that I have observed

from my student days to the present is that there is nothing quite

as permanent as temporary solutions, and they—you tend to rely

on them for a lot longer than one expects to when first going in.

And you all and your successors wind up, you know, having to live

with that—with those constraints.

Chairman CALVERT. I thank the gentleman.

Mr. WU. I yield back my time.

Chairman CALVERT. Mr. Feeney from Florida.

CHALLENGES OF HUMAN SPACE FLIGHT

Mr. FEENEY. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

And for both Dr. Whitson and Lieutenant Colonel Fincke, with

respect to the expertise that you uniquely have as astronauts on

the physiological impacts of space travel in low Earth orbit, do you

have some experiences or guess about what that portends for the

future of mid Earth orbit or high Earth orbit for human beings? We

have got lots of technological challenges. We have talked a little bit

about the exercise to levels. I know we are doing some experiments

on the current Expedition 11 astronauts when they get back, but

based on your experience so far, do you have some scientific challenges that you can help us deal with, or do you just have some

good guesstimates of problems that we are going to face as we

move into further mid and outer Earth orbit?

41

Dr. WHITSON. Well, the human body responds very individually

unfortunately for us, because it would be so much easier for us to

answer the question with one person. Mike’s experience on bone

loss was very different from mine. I lost no overall bone density

during my space flight, but I had a different exercise regime. And

so we are learning from that. Maybe it was the exercise. Maybe it

was something else as part of what we were doing during the mission. We have to pick those pieces apart to find out the best solutions to going further out to the Moon and Mars. I think we are

well on our way. We have seen a lot of promise, and we are getting

the information and data that we need to make the conclusions and

to develop the right procedures to protect and minimize our bodies

against those risks in space. But there are lots of things we have

to work on, the radiation we talked about before. We have to have

exercise hardware that is reliable enough to get us all of the way

there and back and so that when we get to the Moon or Mars we

have that capability to perform well once we are there.

Lieutenant Colonel FINCKE. That is the—we are—we don’t think

we have the bone loss problem licked, but we think we have a good

handle on it. We understand it. The radiation shielding, that is

something we are—that is a little bit right now a long pole in the

tent, and we are spending efforts appropriately to try to figure that

out, how to come up with radiation shields that don’t weigh a lot,

because every kilogram, every pound that you send up costs a lot

of money. And that is one of the tricks, especially as we get out

of low Earth orbit and away from our magnetosphere that we are

really going to have to understand, and we are working towards it.

And hopefully there is going to be some things that we learn about

these lightweight radiation shields that we are going to come up

with that will be applicable for radiation shielding that we need on

the ground, because every hospital I know has an x-ray machine

and things like that, and maybe there are some things that we can

feed back into our industry.

FUTURE CEV DESIGNS

Mr. FEENEY. One of the things I am excited about the new Administrator’s proposal is to shorten the window or eliminate it

when we are out of manned space flight from the original proposal

of 2010 to 2014 and maybe have no window at all, which I am excited about. But the challenge is to design and then produce the

right CEV to replace the Shuttle and to do some more types of missions that are more flexible and more—with different and more exciting capabilities for outer Earth orbit. What do your experiences,

including the exercise, including the psychological impacts as well

as the physiological, what do they tell you about the way, if you

were a designer, you would try to design the next living quarters?

Obviously, you would like to be floating around in a comfortable

RV with a TV and all of the rest of it, but given the reasonable

limitations, what do your experiences tell you designers ought to be

thinking about?

Lieutenant Colonel FINCKE. One thing in the psychological area,

we just like having a telephone. It was really important. I talked

to my wife once or twice a day, not for a long period of time, I was

busy, but it was still just being able to say hi, especially with our

42

new baby that came. And being able to be able to still be in contact

with your friends and family while you are in low Earth orbit or

high Earth orbit or on the Moon is going to be important. It is

going to be a little trickier when you go to Mars, but just having

something as simple as that, because it doesn’t cost very much

mass to put a voice-over IP telephone on with your communication

system. That doesn’t even cost that much money. I can get one at

home really cheap. It is one of these things that makes a big difference yet it doesn’t cost very much in terms of time and money.

And that is a—those are the kinds of things that we are learning

aboard Space Station, what we really need and the things that we

don’t need. Exercise equipment, boy, that is definitely an important

thing, and we had some really good ideas going into it, and now

we are—we have learned from it, and we are moving—you know,

making improvements onto the next series of designs.

Mr. FEENEY. Well, you should run for Congress. A lot of us spend

half our time avoiding the telephone here on terra firma.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Chairman CALVERT. I thank the gentleman.

MICROGRAVITY RESEARCH

I have one question. The issue of the problems with gravity and

you are saying you need to understand that. But we really don’t

understand microgravity, do we, because we haven’t been able to

do, really, any experiments of any note, as far as I know, in on the

International Space Station, is that true?

Dr. WHITSON. Actually, during my mission, the zeolite crystal

growth experiment that I had conducted was actually done in a

special rack called the ARIS, Active Rack Isolation. And it has got

accelerometers that null out. And so basically, the rack itself was

floating inside the Space Station, which is, of course, going around

the Earth. And it has got accelerometers on it to null out any vibrations from the Station itself and to optimize, in that particular

case, the crystal formation that we were looking for. So we have

had a limited capability there with individual racks and experiments within those racks and those special racks.

Chairman CALVERT. How about upon organisms, on living organisms? Have there been any experiments on microgravity on—as

far as the effects of, say, as you mentioned one-third gravity, which

you would have on—or one-sixth gravity that you would have on

the Moon or the one-third gravity that you would have on Mars,

whether it has a zero effect as far as bone loss or no effect at all?

I mean, have there——

Dr. WHITSON. No.

Chairman CALVERT.—been any experiments on any of that at

all?

Dr. WHITSON. Not to this point there have not been any experiments. It was planned to have those experiments conducted when

we get the Centrifuge Accommodation Module up on board.

Chairman CALVERT. Now that is where I was——

Mr. ROHRABACHER. Will the Chairman—excuse me.

Chairman CALVERT. That is where I was just moving toward. Is

the Centrifuge, I believe that is in conjunction with the Japanese,

as far as you know, going ahead?

43

Dr. WHITSON. As far as I know.

Chairman CALVERT. As far as you know? Okay.

Mr. ROHRABACHER. Would the Chairman yield?

Chairman CALVERT. Sure.

Mr. ROHRABACHER. Thank you very much.

When the Space Station docks with their—you know, you noted

that we have a number of resupply missions that are required, and

every time there is a docking required, does this or does this not

interfere with some of these microgravity experiments that are taking place and will take place on the Station? What have we noted?

Dr. WHITSON. We actually do have hardware that monitors and

calibrates the vibrations on board the Space Station, some specific

for the docking events and large events like that, but we also have

a continuous monitoring at various frequency levels so we can monitor what the environment is. And it has been interesting, because

we have found some interesting results relative to that in some of

our exercise activities that have been going on. So we are learning

as we go along where we might be perturbing the microgravity environment on board the Station. As I mentioned, we have the specific area that was specifically designed for those microgravity experiments where it is very important and key not to have those vibrations interfere.

Mr. ROHRABACHER. And thus we have overcome by those protections that we you are talking about, we have overcome the jolt that

might take place with a——

Dr. WHITSON. Yeah. It minimizes those effects dramatically. Yes.

Mr. ROHRABACHER. All right. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.

Chairman CALVERT. Thank you.

Well, with that, I want to thank you, Dr. Whitson and Lieutenant Colonel Fincke, for your attendance here today and, of course,

Dr. Phillips, who came from—to us from outer space. It was an exciting hearing and historic, I understand the first time we have actually had a hearing and heard from our—or heard from a witness

from outer space. So this was a new and exciting thing.

Mr. FEENEY. Mr. Chairman, if I could, I have a point of personal

privilege. I was speaker of the Florida House when we had the

Shuttle astronauts actually take questions from Governor Bush,

Lieutenant Governor Brogan, and the House Speaker, who happened to be me at the time.

Chairman CALVERT. Well, Florida is ahead, once again, of the

rest of us in the country, and so—but this is the first time in the

U.S. House of Representatives, I suspect.

But with that, I thank you, and we appreciate your commitment

and dedication to this country, and we look forward to hearing

from you in the future.

With that, we are adjourned.

[Whereupon, at 3:30 p.m., the Subcommittee was adjourned.]

(45)

Appendix:

ADDITIONAL MATERIAL FOR THE RECORD

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63