alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 375.707 If a shipment is partially lost or destroyed, what charges may I collect at delivery? ( a ) ( 1 ) If a shipment is partially lost or destroyed, you may collect at delivery: ( i ) A prorated percentage of the binding estimate or a prorated percentage of up to 110 percent of the non-binding estimate. The prorated percentage is equal to the percentage of the weight of that portion of the shipment delivered relative to the total weight of the shipment. For example, if you deliver only 2,500 pounds of a shipment weighing 5,000 pounds, you may demand at destination, as applicable, only 50 percent of a binding estimate or 50 percent of not more than 110 percent of a non-binding estimate;
( ii ) Charges for any additional services requested by the shipper after the bill of lading has been issued; and
( iii ) Charges for impracticable operations, if applicable, except that such charges must not exceed 15 percent of all other charges due at delivery.
( iv ) Any specific valuation charge due.
( 2 ) You must bill and collect from the individual shipper any remaining charges not collected at delivery in accordance with subpart H of this part.
( b ) You must determine, at your own expense, the proportion of the shipment, based on actual or constructive weight, not lost or destroyed in transit.
( c ) You may disregard paragraph (a)(1) of this section if loss or destruction was due to an act or omission of the individual shipper.
( d ) The individual shipper's rights are in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other rights the individual shipper may have with respect to a shipment of household goods you or your agent(s) partially lost or destroyed in transit. This applies whether or not the individual shipper exercises any rights to obtain a refund of the portion of your published freight charges corresponding to the portion of the lost or destroyed shipment (including any charges for accessorial or terminal services) at the time you dispose of claims for loss, damage, or injury to articles in the shipment under part 370 of this chapter.
[72 FR 36775, July 5, 2007]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 14-0297

Filed October 15, 2014

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF KATHRYN MARIA SALISBURY 

AND ERIC DAVID SALISBURY

Upon the Petition of

KATHRYN MARIA SALISBURY,

Petitioner-Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

And Concerning

ERIC DAVID SALISBURY,

Respondent-Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Linn County, Kellyann Lekar, 

Judge. 

The parties appeal and cross-appeal the award of joint physical care of 

their minor child. AFFIRMED.

Andrew B. Howie of Hudson, Mallaney, Shindler & Anderson, P.C., West 

Des Moines, for appellant.

Jeannine L. Roberts, Cedar Rapids, for appellee.

Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., and Doyle and McDonald, JJ.
2

MCDONALD, J.

Kathryn “Maria” Salisbury appeals from the order entered August 6, 2013,

dissolving the marriage between Maria and Eric Salisbury and subsequent orders 

regarding the parties’ respective Iowa Rule of Civil Procedure 1.904(2) motions. 

On appeal, Maria contends the district court erred in awarding the parties joint 

physical care of their minor child instead of awarding Maria primary care of the 

child. Eric filed an untimely cross-appeal in which he requested primary care of 

the child if this court determined joint physical care was not in the child’s best 

interests. Eric also requested an award of appellate attorney fees.

We review the district court’s findings and conclusions de novo. See In re 

Marriage of Brown, 776 N.W.2d 644, 647 (Iowa 2009); In re Marriage of Hansen, 

733 N.W.2d 683, 690 (Iowa 2007). An award of appellate attorney fees is within 

our sound discretion. See Spiker v. Spiker, 708 N.W.2d 347, 360 (Iowa 2006). 

The parties stipulated to the resolution of most issues related to the dissolution of 

their marriage. Trial of this matter focused almost exclusively on the issue of 

physical care. The district court’s order dissolving the parties’ marriage and 

awarding joint physical care is supported by the record and is well-reasoned, as 

are the district court’s orders regarding the parties’ respective rule 1.904(2) 

motions. We adopt the district court’s findings and conclusions as our own. 

This appeal presents only the application of well-settled rules of law to a 

recurring fact situation and a full opinion would not augment or clarify existing 

case law. The judgment of the district court is affirmed without further opinion.

See Iowa Ct. R. 21.26(1)(a), (d), and (e). Eric’s cross-appeal is dismissed as 
3

untimely. Court costs and fees shall be assessed to Maria. Each party shall be 

responsible for their respective attorney’s fees.

AFFIRMED.
# 122nd in Afghanistan is there to tell the Guard’s story

/ Published Aug. 16, 2019
Afghanistan, 

                Members of the 122D Public Affairs Operations Center pose in front of a disabled  tank named "Cerbrus"  at Camp Arifjan, Kuwait. Arifjan is known as "The Gateway" because soldiers heading into theater must first check in through Kuwait. From left to right: Master Sgt. Neal Mitchell, Capt. James Deakins, Col. Stanley Seo, Capt. Benjamin Burbank and Maj. Eric Trovillo. (U.S. National Guard photo by Staff Sgt. Michael Tietjen)            

                122nd in Afghanistan is there to tell the Guard’s story            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Sgt. Michael Tietjen

VIRIN: 190627-A-XH706-0514
PUBLIC LAW 109–138—DEC. 22, 2005 119 STAT. 2647

Public Law 109–138

109th Congress

An Act

To authorize early repayment of obligations to the Bureau of Reclamation within

Rogue River Valley Irrigation District or within Medford Irrigation District.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Southern Oregon Bureau of

Reclamation Repayment Act of 2005’’.

SEC. 2. EARLY REPAYMENT.

Notwithstanding the provisions of section 213 of the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 390mm), any landowner within

Rogue River Valley Irrigation District or within Medford Irrigation

District, in Oregon, may repay, at any time, the construction costs

of the project facilities allocated to that landowner’s lands within

the district in question. Upon discharge, in full, of the obligation

for repayment of the construction costs allocated to all lands the

landowner owns in the district in question, those lands shall not

be subject to the ownership and full-cost pricing limitations of

the Act of June 17, 1902 (43 U.S.C. 371 et seq.), and Acts supplemental to and amendatory of that Act, including the Reclamation

Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 390aa et seq.).

SEC. 3. LIMITATION.

Nothing herein modifies contractual rights that may exist

between Rogue River Valley Irrigation District and Medford Irrigation District and the United States under their respective Reclamation contracts, or amends or reopens those contracts; nor does

it modify any rights, obligations or relationships that may exist

between the districts and their landowners as may be provided

or governed by Oregon State law.

SEC. 4. CERTIFICATION.

Upon the request of a landowner who has repaid, in full,

the construction costs of the project facilities allocated to that

landowner’s lands owned within the district, the Secretary of the

Interior shall provide the certification provided for in subsection

Southern Oregon

Bureau of

Reclamation

Repayment Act of

2005.

Dec. 22, 2005

[H.R. 4195]

119 STAT. 2648 PUBLIC LAW 109–138—DEC. 22, 2005

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4195 (S. 1760):

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 109–323 (Comm. on Resources).

SENATE REPORTS: No. 109–197 accompanying S. 1760 (Comm. on Energy and

Natural Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):

Dec. 6, considered and passed House.

Dec. 16, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

(b)(1) of section 213 of the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (43

U.S.C. 390mm(b)(1)).

Approved December 22, 2005.
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The
undersigned officer of Advanzeon Solutions, Inc.(the “Company”) hereby certifies to my knowledge that the
Company’s annual report on Form 10-K/A-2 for the annual period ended December 31, 2019, (the “Report”), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This
certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be a part of the Report or “filed” for any purpose whatsoever.



|By | /s/  Clark
                                         A. Marcus | 
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|   | Clark
    A. Marcus                                           | 
|   | Chairman
    and                                              | 
|   | Chief
    Executive Officer                                   | 



Dated:
July 28, 2020



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been provided to Advanzeon Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by Advanzeon Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 604.11 Petitions to the Administrator. ( a ) A recipient may petition the Administrator for an exception to the charter service regulations to provide charter service directly to a customer for: ( 1 ) Events of regional or national significance;
( 2 ) Hardship (only for non-urbanized areas under 50,000 in population or small urbanized areas under 200,000 in population); or
( 3 ) Unique and time sensitive events (e.g., funerals of local, regional, or national significance) that are in the public's interest.
( b ) The petition to the Administrator shall include the following information: ( 1 ) The date and description of the event;
( 2 ) The type of service requested and the type of equipment;
( 3 ) The anticipated number of charter service hours needed for the event;
( 4 ) The anticipated number of vehicles and duration of the event; and ( i ) For an event of regional or national significance, the petition shall include a description of how registered charter providers were consulted, how registered charter providers will be utilized in providing the charter service, a certification that the recipient has exhausted all of the registered charter providers in its geographic service area, and submit the petition at least 90 days before the first day of the event described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section;
( ii ) For a hardship request, a petition is only available if the registered charter provider has deadhead time that exceeds total trip time from initial pick-up to final drop-off, including wait time. The petition shall describe how the registered charter provider's minimum duration would create a hardship on the group requesting the charter service; or
( iii ) For unique and time sensitive events, the petition shall describe why the event is unique or time sensitive and how providing the charter service would be in the public's interest.
( c ) Upon receipt of a petition that meets the requirements set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, the Administrator shall review the materials and issue a written decision denying or granting the request in whole or in part. In making this decision, the Administrator may seek such additional information as the Administrator deems necessary. The Administrator's decision shall be filed in the Petitions to the Administrator docket, number FTA-2007-0022 at *http://www.regulations.gov* and sent to the recipient.
( d ) Any exception granted by the Administrator under this section shall be effective only for the event identified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
( e ) A recipient shall send its petition to the Administrator by facsimile to (202) 366-3809 or by e-mail to *ombudsman.charterservice@dot.gov .*
( f ) A recipient shall retain a copy of the Administrator's approval for a period of at least three years and shall include it in the recipient's quarterly report posted on the charter registration Web site.
§ 575.4 Application. ( a ) *General.* Except as provided in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section, each section set forth in subpart B of this part applies according to its terms to motor vehicles and tires manufactured after the effective date indicated.
( b ) *Military vehicles.* This part does not apply to motor vehicles or tires sold directly to the Armed Forces of the United States in conformity with contractual specifications.
( c ) *Export.* This part does not apply to motor vehicles or tires intended solely for export and so labeled or tagged.
( d ) *Import.* This part does not apply to motor vehicles or tires imported for purposes other than resale.
[39 FR 1039, Jan. 4, 1974]
#### § 236.782 Point, controlled.

A location where signals and/or other functions of a traffic control system are controlled from the control machine.
§ 534.6 Reporting corporate transactions. Manufacturers who have entered into written contracts transferring rights and responsibilities such that a different manufacturer owns the controlling stock or exerts control over the design, production or sale of automobiles or heavy-duty vehicles to which Corporate Average Fuel Economy or Fuel Consumption standards apply shall report the contract to the agency as follows: ( a ) The manufacturers must file a certified report with the agency affirmatively stating that the contract transfers rights and responsibilities between them such that one manufacturer has assumed a controlling stock ownership or control over the design, production or sale of vehicles. The report must also specify the first full model year to which the transaction will apply.
( b ) Each report shall— ( 1 ) Identify each manufacturer;
( 2 ) State the full name, title, and address of the official responsible for preparing the report;
( 3 ) Identify the production year being reported on;
( 4 ) Be written in the English language; and
( 5 ) Be submitted to: Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
( c ) The manufacturers may seek confidential treatment for information provided in the certified report in accordance with 49 CFR part 512.
[76 FR 57493, Sept. 15, 2011]
Editorial Note on Part 572
Editorial Notes: 1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 572.25 General description. ( a ) The infant dummy is specified in its entirety by means of 5 drawings (No. SA 1001) and a construction manual, dated July 2, 1974, which describe in detail the materials and the procedures involved in the manufacturing of this dummy.
( b ) The drawings, specifications, and construction manual referred to in this regulation that are not set forth in full are hereby incorporated in this part by reference. These materials are thereby made part of this regulation. The Director of the Federal Register has approved the materials incorporated by reference. For materials subject to change, only the specific version approved by the Director of the Federal Register and specified in the regulation are incorporated. A notice of any change will be published in the Federal Register. As a convenience to the reader, the materials incorporated by reference are listed in the Finding Aid Table found at the end of this volume of the Code of Federal Regulations.
( c ) The materials incorporated by reference are available for examination in Docket 78-09, Room 5109, Docket Section, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC, 20590. Copies may be obtained from Rowley-Scher Reprographics, Inc., 1216 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20005 ((202) 628-6667). The materials are also on file in the reference library of the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC.
( d ) The structural properties of the dummy are such that the dummy conforms to this part in every respect both before and after being used in vehicle tests specified in Standard No. 213 of this chapter (§ 571.213).
[50 FR 25424, June 19, 1985]
#### § 531.1 Scope.

This part establishes average fuel economy standards pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 32902 for passenger automobiles.

[89 FR 52945, June 24, 2024]
#### Eliza Allison, *Appellant, v.*The Village of Middletown, *Respondent.*

— Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Pratt, J.;

Dykman, J., not sitting.
# Statement from the U.S. Central Command Commander On Civilian Casualties in West Mosul

/ Published March 26, 2017

March 26, 2017

**TAMPA, Fla.—**
Exhibit 31.1

                                 Certifications

I, Robert C. Shreve, Jr., certify that:

1.   I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Avatar  Systems
     Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge,  this  quarterly  report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to
     make the statements  made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such
     statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
     information  included  in this  quarterly  report,  fairly  present  in all
     material respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash
     flows of the  registrant  as of, and for,  the  periods  presented  in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
     procedures  (as  defined in  Exchange  Act Rule  13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and I have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material information relating to the registrant is made known to me by
          others within those entities,  particularly during the period in which
          this quarterly report was prepared;

     b)   evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and  procedures  as of March  31,  2005 and in this  quarterly  period
          presented in this report ("Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented  in  this  quarterly   report  my   conclusions   about  the
          effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on the
          required evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed,  based on my most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's
     independent  registered  public  accounting firm and the audit committee of
     the registrant's  board of directors (or persons  performing the equivalent
     function):

a)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the  design  or  operation  of  internal
     controls which could adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to record,
     process,  summarize and report  financial data and have  identified for the
     registrant's  independent  registered  public  accounting firm any material
     weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
     employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the  registrant's  internal
     controls; and

Date:     May 13, 2005

                                     /s/ Robert C. Shreve, Jr.
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Chief Executive Officer and
                                    Chief Financial Officer

                                    (principal executive and accounting officer)
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEffects of water on the strength of ZerodurAn experimental design matrix was constructed to determine the effects of time and temperature water soak on the strength of Zerodur glass-ceramic. It was found that strength does increase in a nonlinear manner which is consistent with existing theories of crack tip blunting and residual stress reduction.Document ID19910015117Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsTucker, Dennis S.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Setzer, Andrew*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1991Subject CategoryNonmetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:103535NASA-TM-103535Accession Number91N24430Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910015117.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
1210-AB32-2-1279.html[7/24/2015 10:07:04 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvu-pe9z

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1774

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: margaret samsel

General Comment

My husband and I have waited all our lives to retire. We have saved and invested an the last person we want to

 touch our money is the government. They know how to save money like my kids do. They waste and make us

 pay. 

Don't worry about us.....