alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- 1 - 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

Managing Director and 

Associate General Counsel 

Delta Air Lines, Inc. 

1212 New York Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20005 

202.842.4184 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

August 31, 2010 

via email and regulations.gov 

Mr. Paul Gretch 

Director, Office of International Aviation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: Indefinite Renewal of Blanket Route Integration 

 Authority (DOT-OST-2005-22228) 

Dear Mr. Gretch: 

In response to the Department’s invitation, Delta Air Lines, Inc. hereby advises that 

it wishes to renew for an indefinite term its certificate for blanket route integration 

authority. The certificate was issued by Order 2006-1-1, January 3, 2006. On May 1, 

2009, Delta previously sought renewal of its blanket integration authority (along with 

numerous other authorities), and has invoked the automatic extension provisions of the 

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 USC 558 (c), as implemented by 14 CFR Part 377. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 Alexander Van der Bellen 

cc: Esta Rosenberg 

 Thuy Cooper 

 

 

 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 A copy of the foregoing document has been served this 31st day of August, 2010, 

upon the following persons via email: 

anbird@fedex.com 

anita.mosner@hklaw.com 

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com 

bill@mietuslaw.com 

bob.kneisley@wnco.com 

BTHunt@pncl.com 

byerlyjr@state.gov 

carl.nelson@aa.com 

dan.weiss@coair.com 

dhainbach@ggh-airlaw.com 

dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil 

hkamen@coair.com 

howard_kass@usairways.com 

jeffrey.manley@united.com 

john.allen@faa.gov 

jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com 

steve.morrissey@united.com 

jyoung@yklaw.com 

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com 

matwood@sherblackwell.com 

mroller@rollerbauer.com 

mrosia@crowell.com 

rpommer@atlasair.com 

rsilverberg@sgbdc.com 

slachter@lachter-clements.com 

art.thomas@horizonair.com 

ben.graves@evergreenairlines.com 

Brian.Gillman@mesa-air.com 

robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com 

patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com 

jennifer.trock@pillsburylaw.com 

barbara.russell@virginamerica.com 

bruce.rabinovitz@wilmerhale.com 

cdonley@ssd.com 

dkirstein@yklaw.com 

dvaughan@kelleydrye.com 

ebailey@wileyrein.com 

efaberman@wileyrein.com 

gmurphy@crowell.com 

gwhite@lac.lynden.com 

jhill@dowlohnes.com 

John.Fredericksen@suncountry.com 

john.palo@evergreenairlines.com 

judy@lynden.com 

kenneth.quinn@pillsburylaw.com 

lhalloway@crowell.com 

mcmillin@woa.com 

mlbenge@zsrlaw.com 

msinick@ssd.com 

mwiegele@nac.aero 

pmurphy@lopmurphy.com 

ranjit.seth@evergreenairlines.com 

rbkeiner@crowell.com 

robert.land@jetblue.com 

scott.peterson@expressjet.com 

sllunsford@fedex.com 

temerson@skywest.com 

info@airlineinfo.com 

pdoell@naca.cc 

rpriddy@naca.cc 

TZoeller@naca.cc
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 9/18/15 

Received: September 18, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8l78-vcao

Comments Due: September 24, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule- Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-5297

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: P A Bulock

General Comment

As your constituent, the financial future of my family is deeply important. I have become 

increasingly concerned that the Department of Labor's (DOL) proposed retirement rule will limit 

my right to pick and choose a financial professional who fits my budget and needs. This choice 

should be mine.

Today, I have the option to work with any financial professional I choose. I'm aware of the 

different models: a fee-based adviser, a commission-based broker, or a self-directed platform. 

These choices allow me to pick the costs and types of services I want. The DOL's long list of 

complex restrictions and requirements will effectively prevent me from choosing what fits my 

needs. Why should I be forced into more expensive plans or have to accept less access to 

financial guidance because of a government regulation?

At a time when saving for retirement is so difficult, I cannot afford rules that create new 

obstacles to achieving my retirement goals. The DOL's rule will also limit the sort of investment 

options available to me as well. Instead, Congress should intervene with the DOL to protect my 

choice of retirement products and services at the price I want to pay.

As your constituent, I urge you to take action to protect my retirement choices from the DOL 

rule.
-----Original Message----- 

From: chrisdc@flash.net [mailto:chrisdc@flash.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 6:26 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Margaret Christine Robinett 

3631 Cabernet Vineyards Cir 

San Jose, CA 95117
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 38 (Monday, February 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 11533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4482]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[CERCLA-04-2012-3763; FRL 9637-7]

Anniston PCB Superfund Site, Anniston, Calhoun County, Alabama; 
Notice of Amended Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of Settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation 
and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States Environmental Protection 
Agency has entered into a settlement for past response costs concerning 
the Anniston PCB Superfund Site located in Anniston, Calhoun County, 
Alabama.

DATES: The Agency will consider public comments on the settlement until 
March 28, 2012. The Agency will consider all comments received and may 
modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received 
disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is 
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are available from Ms. Paula V. 
Painter. Submit your comments by Site name Anniston PCB by one of the 
following methods:
    www.epa.gov/region4/superfund/programs/enforcement/enforcement.html.
     Email. Painter.Paula@epa.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula V. Painter at 404/562-8887.

    Dated: February 2, 2012.
Anita L. Davis,
Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Superfund 
Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-4482 Filed 2-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
CERTIFICATION                                                       Exhibit 31.1

I, Martin A. Roenigk, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CompuDyne Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the period presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and I,  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and  procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially  affected,  or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's   auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of  registrant's  board  of
directors:

         (a) All significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that  involves  management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

         Date:  March 27, 2006
                                             /s/ Martin Roenigk
                                             ------------------
                                             Martin Roenigk
                                             Chief Executive Officer



                                       69
49–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 109–357 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS TO 

SUSPEND THE RULES 

DECEMBER 17, 2005.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 631] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 631, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution authorizes the Speaker to entertain motions that 

the House suspend the rules at any time on the legislative day of 

Sunday, December 18, 2005, relating to the following measures: 

(1) The bill (H.R. 1185) to reform the Federal deposit insurance system, and for other purposes. 

(2) A bill to reauthorize the Temporary Assistance for Needy 

Families block grant program through March 31, 2006, and for 

other purposes. 

(3) The resolution (H. Res. 545) expressing the sense of the 

House of Representatives on the arrest of Sanjar Umarov in 

Uzbekistan. 

(4) The concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 284) expressing 

the sense of Congress with respect to the 2005 presidential and 

parliamentary elections in Egypt. 

(5) The bill (H.R. 4501) to amend the Passport Act of June 

4, 1920, to authorize the Secretary of State to establish and 

collect a surcharge to cover the costs of meeting the increased 

demand for passports as a result of actions taken to comply 

with section 7209(b) of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism 

Prevention Act of 2004. 

(6) The bill (S. 1988) to authorize the transfer of items in the 

War Reserves Stockpile for Allies, Korea. 

2 

(7) The bill (H.R. 2329) to permit eligibility in certain circumstances for an officer or employee of a foreign government 

to receive a reward under the Department of State Rewards 

Program. 

(8) A resolution honoring Helen Sewell on the occasion of her 

retirement from the House of Representatives and expressing 

the gratitude of the House for her many years of service. 

Æ
§ 366.4 Required States. ( a ) Every motor carrier, except a motor carrier operating exclusively in Alaska or Hawaii, must designate process agents for all 48 contiguous States and the District of Columbia, unless its operating authority registration is limited to fewer than 48 States and DC. When a motor carrier's operating authority registration is limited to fewer than 48 States and DC, it must designate process agents for each State in which it is authorized to operate and for each State traversed during such operations. Every motor carrier operating in the United States in the course of transportation between points in a foreign country shall file a designation for each State traversed. Every motor carrier maintaining a principal place of business and operating exclusively in Alaska or Hawaii must designate a process agent for the State where operations are conducted.
( b ) *Brokers.* Every broker shall make a designation for each State, including DC, in which its offices are located or in which contracts will be written.
( c ) *Freight forwarders.* Every freight forwarder shall make a designation for each State, including DC, in which its offices are located or in which contracts will be written.
[80 FR 63706, Oct. 21, 2015; 81 FR 49554, July 28, 2016] Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 82 FR 5303, Jan. 17, 2017, § 366.4 was suspended, effective Jan. 14, 2017.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135006 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PATRICIA EVANISH, Personal Stephen J. Markman, Representative of the Estate of Justices Nick R. Evanish, Deceased,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 135006 

 COA: 259995 

Genesee CC: 03-076214-NH 

JEFFREY LEDIS, D.O., GARY L. 

WEBER, D.O., DAVID DOBIES, 

D.O., REGIONAL CARDIOLOGY

ASSOCIATES, P.L.C., and 

GENESYS REGIONAL MEDICAL 

CENTER, 

 Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 6, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals 

because the plaintiff falls within the class of plaintiffs entitled to relief identified in our 

order in Mullins v St Joseph Mercy Hospital (Docket No. 131879), ___ Mich ___ 

(decided 11/28/07). We REMAND this case to the Genesee Circuit Court for entry of an 

order denying the defendants' motion for summary disposition and for further 

proceedings not inconsistent with this order and the order in Mullins. In all other 

respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining 

question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1217 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 8, 2008 

Clerk
###### Editorial Note on Part 393

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 393 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 393.112 Must a tiedown be adjustable?

Each tiedown, or its associated connectors, or its attachment mechanisms must be designed, constructed, and maintained so the driver of an in-transit commercial motor vehicle can tighten them. However, this requirement does not apply to the use of steel strapping.
#### Ann Slevin, *Respondent, v.*Margaret McCormack, *Appellant, Impleaded, etc.*

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Brady, J.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                Exhibit (23)-1
                                                            Unicom Corporation
                                                    Form 10-K File No. 1-11375



                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                    -----------------------------------------



         As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in this Form 10-K of our report dated February 19,
1999 on Unicom Corporation and Subsidiary Companies' consolidated financial
statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 1998, included in
Unicom Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February, 19, 1999, to the
inclusion in this Form 10-K of our report dated February 19, 1999, on the
supplemental schedule of Unicom Corporation as of and for the year ended
December 31, 1998, and to the incorporation of such reports into Unicom
Corporation's previously filed prospectuses dated March 18, 1994, constituting
part of Form S-4 Registration Statement File No. 33-52109, as amended (relating
to Common Stock of Unicom Corporation), as further amended by Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 on Form S-8 (relating to Commonwealth Edison Company's Employee
Savings and Investment Plan) and Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 on Form S-8
(relating to Unicom Corporation's Employee Stock Purchase Plan), Form S-8
Registration Statement File No. 33-56991 (relating to Unicom Corporation's
Long-Term Incentive Plan), Form S-4 Registration Statement File No. 333-01003
(relating to the common stock of Unicom Corporation), Form S-8 Registration
Statement File No. 333-04749 (relating to Unicom Corporation's 1996 Directors'
Fee Plan), Form S-8 Registration Statement File Nos. 333-10613 and 333-26779
(relating to Commonwealth Edison Company's Employee Savings and Investment Plan)
and Form S-8 Registration Statement File No. 333-39677 (relating to the Unicom
Corporation Management Deferred Compensation Plan). We also consent to the
application of our report, incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K, to
Commonwealth Edison Company and Subsidiary Companies' ratios of earnings to
fixed charges and the ratios of earnings to fixed charges and preferred and
preference stock dividend requirements for each of the years ended December 31,
1998, 1997 and 1996 appearing in Exhibit 99 of Unicom Corporation's Current
Report on Form 8-K dated February 19, 1999.



                                                       ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 29, 1999
Editorial Note on Part 572
Editorial Notes: 1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 572.72 Head assembly and test procedure. ( a ) *Head assembly.* The head consists of the assembly designated as SA 106 010 on drawing No. SA 106C 001, sheet 2, and conforms to each drawing listed on SA 106C 001, sheet 8.
( b ) *Head assembly impact response requirements.* When the head is impacted by a test probe conforming to § 572.77(a)(1) at 7 feet per second (fps) according to the test procedure in paragraph (c) of this section, then the resultant head acceleration measured at the location of the accelerometer installed in the headform according to § 577.77(b) is not less than 130g and not more than 160g. ( 1 ) The recorded acceleration-time curve for this test is unimodal at or above the 50g level, and lies at or above that level for an interval not less than 1.0 and not more than 2.0 milliseconds.
( 2 ) The lateral acceleration vector does not exceed 5g.
( c ) *Head test procedure.* The test procedure for the head is as follows: ( 1 ) Seat and orient the dummy on a seating surface having a back support as specified in § 572.78(c), and adjust the joints of the limbs at any setting (between 1g and 2g) which just supports the limbs' weight when the limbs are extended horizontally and forward.
( 2 ) Adjust the test probe so that its longitudinal center line is— ( i ) At the forehead at the point of orthogonal intersection of the head midsagittal plane and the transverse plane which is perpendicular to the Z axis of the head as shown in Figure 40;
( ii ) Located 2.7 ±0.1 inches below the top of the head measured along the Z axis, and;
( iii ) Coincides within 2 degrees with the line made by the intersection of the horizontal and midsagittal planes passing through this point.
( 3 ) Impact the head with the test probe so that at the moment of contact the probe's longitudinal center line falls within 2 degrees of a horizontal line in the dummy's midsagittal plane.
( 4 ) Guide the test probe during impact so that there is no significant lateral, vertical, or rotational movement.
( 5 ) Allow at least 60 minutes between successive head tests.
#### § 510.8 Written requests for the production of documents and things.

The NHTSA may, by the issuance of a written request for the production of documents and things, require any person, sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, or other entity to produce documents or things. A written request for the production of documents and things may be issued alone, or as a part of a general or special order issued under § 510.7. Written requests for the production of documents and things are issued by the Chief Counsel. Any written request for the production of documents and things issued under this section shall contain the information specified in § 510.3(b).
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0868.html[7/21/2015 4:54:30 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-b3e1

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0868

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Katy Blackburn

General Comment

Leave my retirement to me. I'm smart enough to plan for it myself. I don't need your help.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0679.html[7/21/2015 8:27:04 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-kgxu

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0679

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Tim Sams

General Comment

Please do not intrude in my affairs any more than you already have. I and my family have worked very hard to

 save for our retirement, and do not need a government agency telling me how to handle my money.