T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T R ON AL D MAR C US L E I S T I KO , P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. I NTERNA TI ON AL LONG SHORE & W A R E H O U S E U N I O N /L O C A L 8 ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 10- 36028 D . C. N o . 3 : 1 0 - c v - 0 0 6 0 4 - BR ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

O r e gon A nnaJ . B r ow n, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry21, 2012 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , M cK E O W N , an d B Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R ona l d M a r c us L e i s t i ko appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nt di s m i s s i ng hi s a c t i on a ga i ns tthe I nt e rna t i ona l L ongs hor e & W a r e hous e U ni on, L oc a l 8 ( “ I L W U ” ) . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w de 

# FI LED MA R 05 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 36028 2 n o v o . Cram erv. C on sol. Fre i gh tw ays, Inc. , 25 5 F . 3d 68 3, 68 9 (9th C i r. 20 01 ) ( en b a n c ) ( p r e e m p tio n ) ; G al i ndo v . StoodyC o. , 793 F . 2d 1502, 1508 ( 9th C i r . 1986) ( s ta tu te o f

lim ita tio n s ) . W e a f

f irm . T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y c on cl ud ed thatL ei st i ko ’ s c l ai m thathe w as w r ongf ul l yde - r e gi s t e r e d f

r om the uni on w a s pr e e m pt e d by§ 301 of the L abor M a n a g e m e n t R e la tio n s A c t ( “L M R A ” ) b e c au s e r e s o lu tio n o f h is c la im w o u ld r e q u ir e in te rp r e tin g lab o ra g r e e m e n ts . See Cram er , 25 5 F . 3d at69 3 (st at e l aw cl ai m pree m pt ed un der § 30 1 i f i tw ou l d requi re i nt erpret i ng a l abor agree m ent ). T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l yc onc l ude d tha tL e i s t i ko’ s c l a i m , a s pr e e m pt e d by § 3 0 1 , w as b arred b y th e si x -m o n th st atu t e o f l i m i t at i o n s. Se e C onle yv . I nt ’ l B hd. of E le c . W orke rs , L oc al

639 , 8 1 0 F .2 d 9 1 3 , 9 1 4 -1 5 (9 th C ir. 1 9 8 7 ) ( p lain ti ff’s com pl ai ntal l egi ng vi ol at i on s of § 30 1 o f the L M R A and st at e c on tra ctl aw w as s ubj e c tt o the N a t i ona l L aborR e l a t i ons A c t ’ s s i x- m onth s t a tut e of l i m i t a t i ons be c aus e e s s e nc e of

pl a i nt i f f’ s c om pl a i ntw a s tha tthe uni on f a i l e d t o a c tf

a i r l yon h is b e h a lf

) ; G al i ndo , 79 3 F . 2d at15 09 (l i m i t at i on s per i od begi ns t o run w hen p la in tif f k n o w s o rs h o u ld h a v e k n o w n o f th e u n io n ’s a lle g e d w r o n g d o in g ) . T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y deni ed L ei st i ko ’ s m ot i on t o rem and t o st at e c ou rt b e c au s e th e I L W U tim e lyr e m o v e d th e a c tio n . See 28 U . S . C . § 1446( b) ( not i c e of r e m ova l m us tbe f

i l e d w i thi n thi rtyda y s a f t e rthe de f

e nda nt ’ s r e c e i ptof

the10- 36028 3 c o m p la in t) ; D - B e am L td. P ’s hi p v . R ol le rD e r bySkate s , I nc . , 366 F . 3d 972, 974 n. 2 (9th C i r. 20 04 ) ( appl yi ng de no vo re vi ew t o d eni al of m ot i on t o rem and). L ei st i ko ’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. A F F I R M E D .