United States

Environmental Protection

Agency

Office of Water

(4303)

EPA

EPA 821-R-00-005

March 2000

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for the

Final Action Regarding Pretreatment

Standards for the Industrial Laundries

Point Source Category

(Revised March 2000)
COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS FOR THE

FINAL ACTION REGARDING 

PRETREATMENT STANDARDS FOR THE 

INDUSTRIAL LAUNDRIES POINT SOURCE CATEGORY

(REVISED MARCH 2000)

FINAL REPORT

Carol M. Browner

Administrator

J. Charles Fox

Assistant Administrator, Office of Water

Sheila Frace

Director, Engineering and Analysis Division

Marvin B. Rubin

Chief, Energy Branch

George Denning

Work Assignment Manager

Engineering and Analysis Division

Office of Science and Technology

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Washington, D.C. 20460
FOREWORD

This document delineates the cost-effectiveness analysis of the final action regarding

pretreatment standards for the Industrial Laundries Point Source Category. Based on revised analytical

data for semivolatile organic compounds for two sampling episodes conducted in 1996 and 1998, EPA

revised this document in March 2000. The following sections and appendices have been revised:

• Section 2

—footnote #2;

—Table 2-2.

• Section 3

—Table 3-1.

• Section 4

—Table 4-1.

• Appendix A

• Appendix B

—Table B-1 and B-2; reference date of 1999 deleted.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This report has been reviewed and approved for publication by the Engineering and

Analysis Division, Office of Science and Technology. This report was prepared with the support

of Eastern Research Group, Inc. (Contract No. 68-C6-0022), under the direction and review of

the Office of Science and Technology.
i

CONTENTS

Page

SECTION ONE INTRODUCTION .................................. 1-1

SECTION TWO BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY ................. 2-1

2.1 Pollutants of Concern ........................................ 2-3

2.2 Toxic Weighting Factors ...................................... 2-3

2.3 Pollution Control Options ..................................... 2-4

2.4 Pollutant Removals ......................................... 2-5

2.5 Annualized Costs of Compliance ................................ 2-6

2.6 Calculation of the Cost-Effectiveness Values ........................ 2-8

SECTION THREE COST-EFFECTIVENESS RESULTS ..................... 3-1

SECTION FOUR COMPARISON OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS VALUES WITH

PROMULGATED RULES ............................ 4-1

APPENDIX A SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR COST-EFFECTIVENESS

ANALYSIS: POLLUTANT LOADING ANALYSIS .......... A-1

APPENDIX B SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR COST-EFFECTIVENESS

ANALYSIS: COST ANALYSIS ........................ B-1
1-1

SECTION ONE

INTRODUCTION

This report supports the analysis of options and cutoffs considered as pretreatment standards for

the industrial laundries industry. In this document, the total annualized cost of each of two regulatory

options are compared to the corresponding effectiveness of that option, at the cutoffs, considered in

reducing the discharge of pollutants. EPA evaluates the effectiveness in terms of costs per pound of

pollutant removed, weighted by the relative toxicity of the pollutant (toxic weighting factor). The rationale

for this measure, referred to as "pounds-equivalent removed," is described later in this document.

Section Two discusses EPA’s cost-effectiveness methodology and identifies the pollutants included

in the analysis. This section also presents EPA’s toxic weighting factors for each pollutant and considers

the removal efficiency of each option. Section Three presents the results of the cost-effectiveness analysis.

In Section Four, the cost-effectiveness value for the regulatory option and cutoff considered for the

pretreatment standards is compared to cost-effectiveness values for other proposed and promulgated rules.

Appendix A and B present the pollutant reduction and costs for all cutoffs considered under the two

options that EPA considered during its decisionmaking process.
2-1

SECTION TWO

BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY

Cost-effectiveness (CE) is evaluated as the incremental and average annualized cost of a pollution

control option in an industry or industry subcategory per incremental and total pound equivalent of

pollutant (i.e., pound of pollutant adjusted for toxicity) removed by that control option. The costeffectiveness analysis primarily enables EPA to compare the removal efficiencies of regulatory options

under consideration for a rule. A secondary use is to compare the cost effectiveness of the proposed option

for the pretreatment standards to that of pretreatment standards for other industries. 

EPA generally ranks options in order of increasing pound equivalents removed to identify the point

at which increased removal of pollutants is no longer cost-effective. EPA typically determines this to be

where costs (per pound equivalent removed) increase sharply, that is, where relatively few incremental

pounds are removed for steady increases in cost. The accompanying figure (Figure 2-1) shows this point

as Point A, where the cost-effectiveness curve becomes nearly vertical. Increases in removals beyond this

point come only at relatively high unit costs, which, in many cases, EPA will determine exceed the benefit

of the increased removals to society. In this analysis, for reasons discussed below, EPA presents average

cost-effectiveness values only.

A number of steps must be undertaken before a cost-effectiveness analysis can be performed. 

There are five steps that define the analysis or generate data for use in the cost-effectiveness calculation:

! Determine the wastewater pollutants of concern (priority and other pollutants).

! Estimate the relative toxic weights (the adjustments to pounds of pollutants to reflect

toxicity) of the pollutants of concern.

! Define the regulatory pollution control options.

! Calculate pollutant removals for each pollution control option.

! Determine the annualized cost of each pollution control option.
2-2

Costs in dollar per pound equivalents removed.

Range of 

noncosteffective 

removals

Range of

cost-effective

removals

{

{

0 100 

Percentage of pound equivalents removed

A

Figure 2-1. Cost effectiveness
 

1

 Although the water quality criterion has been revised (to 12.0 μg/l), all cost-effectiveness analyses for

effluent guideline regulations continue to use the "old" criterion of 5.6 μg/l as a benchmark so that costeffectiveness values can continue to be compared to those for other effluent guidelines. Where copper is

present in the effluent, the revised higher criterion for copper results in a toxic weighting factor for copper of

0.467 rather than 1.0.

2-3

All of these factors are used in the calculation of the cost-effectiveness values, which can then be

compared for each regulatory option under consideration. The following sections discuss the five

preliminary steps and the cost-effectiveness calculation and comparison methodologies.

2.1 POLLUTANTS OF CONCERN

Under the pretreatment standards, a number of priority and other nonconventional pollutants are

regulated. Some of the factors considered in selecting pollutants for regulation include toxicity, frequency

of occurrence in wastestream effluent, and amount of pollutant in the wastestream. The list of regulated

pollutants for each option is presented in Appendix A.

2.2 TOXIC WEIGHTING FACTORS

Cost-effectiveness analyses account for differences in toxicity among the pollutants using toxic

weighting factors. These factors are necessary because different pollutants have different potential effects

on human and aquatic life. For example, a pound of zinc in an effluent stream has a significantly different

effect than a pound of PCBs. Toxic weighting factors for pollutants are derived using ambient water

quality criteria and toxicity values. For most industries, toxic weighting factors are derived from chronic

freshwater aquatic criteria. In cases where a human health criterion has also been established for the

consumption of fish, the sum of both the human and aquatic criteria are used to derive toxic weighting

factors. The factors are standardized by relating them to a “benchmark” toxicity value that was based on

the toxicity of copper when the methodology was developed.1 Appendix A presents the toxic weighting

factors used for the regulated pollutants in the cost-effectiveness analysis of the industrial laundries

industry.
2-4

Examples of the effects of different aquatic and human health criteria on freshwater toxic

weighting factors are presented in Table 2-1. As shown in this table, the toxic weighting factor is the sum

of two criteria-weighted ratios: the “benchmark/old” copper criterion divided by the human health criterion

for the particular pollutant and the “benchmark/old” copper criterion divided by the aquatic chronic

criterion. For example, using the values reported in Table 2-1, 11 pounds of the benchmark chemical

(copper) pose the same relative hazard in freshwater as one pound of cadmium because cadmium has a

freshwater toxic weight 11 times as large as the toxic weight of copper (5.16/0.467=11.05).

Table 2-1

Examples of Toxic Weighting Factors

Based on Copper Freshwater Chronic Criteria

Pollutant

Human Health

Criteria

(μg/l)

Aquatic

Chronic

Criteria (μg/l) Weighting Calculation

Toxic

Weighting

Factor

Coppera--- 12.0 5.6/12.0 0.467

Cadmium 84 1.1 5.6/84 + 5.6/1.1 5.16

Naphthalene 41,026 370 5.6/41,026 + 5.6/370 0.015

aAlthough the water quality criterion for copper has been revised (to 12.0 μg/l), the cost effectiveness

analysis used the previous criterion (5.6 μg/l) to facilitate comparisons with cost-effectiveness values for

other effluent limitations guidelines. The revised higher criteria for copper results in a toxic weighting

factor for copper equal to 0.467 instead of 1.0, which was the result of the previous criterion.

Notes: Human health and aquatic chronic criteria are maximum contamination thresholds. Units for

criteria are micrograms of pollutant per liter of water.

Sources: EPA, 1997. Toxic and Pollutant Weighting Factors for Pretreatment Standards for the

Industrial Laundries Point Source Category. June.
2-5

2.3 POLLUTION CONTROL OPTIONS

Pretreatment Standards for Existing Sources (PSES) and Pretreatment Standards for New

Sources (PSNS) options would have been issued had EPA promulgated a rule. Because there are no direct

discharges in the industrial laundry industry, Best Available Technology (BAT), New Source Performance

Standards (NSPS), and Best Practicable Control Technology (BPT) are not considered. This costeffectiveness analysis was performed for two pollution control options, at each cutoff, for indirect

dischargers: CP-IL, chemical precipitation treatment of wastewater from industrial laundry items; and

DAF-IL, dissolved air flotation treatment of wastewater from industrial laundry items. A zero-discharge

option is not considered within the analysis.

The cutoffs are defined as:

# A cutoff excluding all facilities laundering less than 1 million pounds of incoming laundry

(total) and less than 255,000 pounds of shop and/or printer towels per calender year (this

cutoff is identical to that proposed). This cutoff is called the 1MM/255K cutoff for the

purposes of this EA.

# A cutoff excluding all facilities that launder between 1 and 3 million pounds of incoming

laundry (total) and less than 120,000 pounds of shop and/or printer towels per calender

year, in addition to those facilities laundering less than 1 million pounds of incoming

laundry (total) and less than 255,000 pounds of shop and/or printer towels per calender

year. This cutoff is called the 3MM/120K cutoff for the purposes of this EA.

# A cutoff excluding all facilities laundering less than 5 million pounds of incoming laundry

(total) and less than 255,000 pounds of shop and/or printer towels per calender year. This

cutoff is called the 5MM/255K cutoff for the purposes of this EA.

EPA’s selected option and cutoff is CP-IL under the 3MM/120K cutoff.

2.4 POLLUTANT REMOVALS

The pollutant loadings have been calculated for each facility under each regulatory cutoff and

option for comparison with baseline loadings. The postregulatory removals under each regulatory cutoff

and option are presented in Appendix A.
 

2

 U.S. EPA, 2000. Technical Development Document for the Final Action Regarding Pretreatment

Standards for the Industrial Laundries Point Source Category (Revised March 2000). 821-R-00-006. March,

and U.S. EPA, 2000. Economic Assessment for the Final Action Regarding Pretreatment Standards for the

Industrial Laundries Point Source Category (Revised March 2000). 821-R-00-004. March.

2-6

Pollutant removals are calculated directly as the difference between current and post-treatment

discharges. Removals are then weighted using the toxic weighting factors and are reported in pound

equivalents (see Appendix A for pound-equivalent removals for all pollutants by pollutant and cutoff). 

Total removals for each cutoff are then calculated by summing the removals for all pollutants under each

cutoff. 

One additional step is undertaken to calculate final reductions in pollutant loadings for indirect

dischargers because of the ability of POTWs to remove pollutants, measured as POTW removal

efficiencies. Appendix A presents the POTW removal efficiencies for 72 pollutants. 

POTW removal efficiencies are used as follows. If a facility is discharging 100 pounds of

cadmium in its effluent stream to a POTW and the POTW has a removal efficiency for cadmium of

38 percent, then the cadmium discharged to surface waters is only 62 pounds. If the regulation results in a

reduction of cadmium in the effluent stream such that total cadmium discharged to the POTW is

50 pounds, then the amount discharged to surface waters is calculated as 50 pounds multiplied by the

POTW removal efficiency factor (1 - 0.38 or 0.62 times 50 pounds equals 31 pounds). The costeffectiveness calculations then reflect the fact that the actual reduction of pollutant discharged to surface

water is not 50 pounds (the change in the amount discharged to the POTW), but 31 pounds (the change in

the amount actually discharged to surface water). Pollutant removals calculated in this way are presented

in Table 2-2. 

2.5 ANNUALIZED COSTS OF COMPLIANCE

Under each regulatory cutoff, annualized costs of compliance have been developed.2 The

derivation of these costs is summarized briefly below.
2-7

Table 2-2

Total Pollutant Removals by Option and Cutoff

Option

Pounds

Removed

Pounds-Equivalent

Removed

CP-IL

 no cutoff 143,410,775 42,917

1MM/255K cutoff 139,765,321 42,155

3MM/120K cutoff 129,736,310 38,483

5MM/255K cutoff 108,573,146 31,403

DAF-IL

 no cutoff 157,363,650 35,245

1MM/255K cutoff 153,652,407 34,542

3MM/120K cutoff 140,768,046 31,577

5MM/255K cutoff 115,088,807 25,774

Source: Tables A-1 through A-8.
 

3

 Every dollar spent on compliance can be applied against a firm's taxable income. Due to various tax

mechanisms such as accelerated depreciation, this reduction means that firms face only about 70 percent of

compliance costs after taxes.

 

4

 Source of real cost of capital: Office of Management and Budget (OMB), 1996. “Memorandum to the

regulatory working group on economic analysis of federal regulations under Executive Order 12866.” Sally

Katzen.

2-8

EPA derived the pretax costs (including the state and federal governments' share of compliance

costs)3 of purchasing, installing, and operating pollution control equipment. EPA annualized any capital 

costs at 7 percent4 over 16 years and added these costs to the annual costs of operating the pollution control

equipment. The aggregate annual pretax costs by option are presented in Table 2-3. Appendix B presents

the calculations used to arrive at the aggregate annual costs figures presented in Table 2-3. 

2.6 CALCULATION OF THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS VALUES

Cost-effectiveness values are calculated separately for each regulatory option. Generally,

options first are ranked in ascending order of pounds equivalent of pollutants removed. The incremental

cost-effectiveness value for a particular control option is calculated as the ratio of the incremental annual

cost to the incremental pounds equivalent removed. Average cost-effectiveness values for each option are

calculated as total dollars for the option divided by total pounds equivalent removed by the option. The

incremental cost-effectiveness values are viewed in comparison to the baseline (zero costs/zero removals)

for the first option and to the preceding regulatory option. Cost-effectiveness values are reported in units of

dollars per pounds equivalent of pollutant removed. In this report, EPA presents average cost-effectiveness

values, as discussed below.

For the purpose of comparing cost-effectiveness values of options under review to those of

other promulgated rules, compliance costs used in the cost-effectiveness analysis (which are in 1993

dollars) are adjusted to 1981 dollars using Engineering News Record's Construction Cost Index (CCI) (see

Table 3 for compliance costs in 1981 dollars). This adjustment factor is calculated as follows:

Adjustment factor = (1981 CCI)/(1993 CCI) = 3,535/5,210 = 0.6785

The equation used to calculate incremental cost effectiveness is:
2-9

Table 2-3

Aggregate Annual Cost by Option and Cutoff

Option

Pretax Annualized

Cost

($1993)

Pretax Annualized

Cost

($1981)

CP-IL

 no cutoff $179,038,176 $121,477,403

1MM/255K cutoff $170,554,625 $115,721,313

3MM/120K cutoff $130,174,744 $88,323,564

5MM/255K cutoff $77,651,658 $52,686,650

DAF-IL

 no cutoff $194,646,184 $132,067,436

1MM/255K cutoff $186,452,404 $126,507,956

3MM/120K cutoff $145,061,785 $98,424,421

5MM/255K cutoff $88,648,588 $60,148,067

Source: see Tables B-1 and B-2.
2-10

CEk'

ATCk& ATCk&1

PEk& PEk&1

where:

CEk= Cost-effectiveness of Option k

ATCk= Total annualized treatment cost under Option k

PEk= Pound equivalents removed by Option k

The numerator of the equation, ATCk minus ATCk-1, is simply the incremental annualized

treatment cost in going from Option k-1 (an option that removes fewer pound equivalent pollutants) to

Option k (an option that removes more pound equivalent pollutants). The denominator is similarly the

incremental removals achieved in going from Option k-1 to k. Thus, cost effectiveness measures the

incremental unit cost of pollutant removal of Option k (in pound equivalents) in comparison to 

Option k-1.

Because the options are ranked in ascending order of pound equivalents of pollutants removed,

any option that has higher costs but lower removals than another option immediately can be identified (the

cost-effectiveness value for the next option becomes negative). When negative values are computed for

Option k, Option k-1 will be noted as "dominated" (having a higher cost and lower removals than Option

k). Option k-1 is then removed from the cost-effectiveness calculations, and all cost-effectiveness values

within a regulatory grouping are then recalculated without the "dominated" option. This process continues

until all "dominated" options are eliminated. The remaining options can then be presented in terms of their

incremental cost-effectiveness values and are considered viable options for regulatory consideration. 

Average cost-effectiveness values can also be derived by setting ATCk-1 to zero and by setting

the pollutant loadings (PEk-1) to the current loading. These values can be used, with caution, to compare an

option to previously promulgated effluent limitations guidelines. Because the DAF-IL option removes fewer

pollutants at a higher cost than the CP-IL option, DAF-IL is dominated. Because DAF-IL is dominated

incremental cost-effectiveness is not meaningful. Thus EPA presents, in Section Three, the average costeffectiveness results for CP-IL and DAF-IL at each cutoff.
3-1

SECTION THREE

COST-EFFECTIVENESS RESULTS

In this cost-effectiveness analysis, EPA evaluates two PSES options, assuming only that

wastewater from industrial laundry items will be treated (linen supply wastewater would not have required

treatment). If untreated, the treated and untreated streams are combined prior to discharge. Table 3-1

presents the cost-effectiveness data and results. As Table 3-1 shows, the average cost-effectiveness value

for the CP-IL 3MM/120K option is $2,295/lb-eq. Note that because DAF-IL is dominated, the average

cost-effectiveness value of CP-IL under the 3MM/120K cutoff is also the incremental cost-effectiveness

value for that option and cutoff.

Table 3-1

Cost-Effectiveness Results by Option and Cutoff

 

Option

Total Annual Average

Cost

Effectiveness

($1981)

($/lb. equiv.)

Pound 

Equivalents

Removed

(lbs.)

Cost 

($1981)

CP-IL

 No cutoff 42,917 $121,477,403 $2,831

 1MM/255K 42,155 $115,721,313 $2,745

 3MM/120K 38,483 $88,323,564 $2,295

 5MM/255K 31,403 $52,686,650 $1,678

DAF-IL

 No cutoff 35,245 $132,067,436 $3,747

 1MM/255K 34,542 $126,507,956 $3,662

 3MM/120K 31,577 $98,424,421 $3,117

 5MM/255K 25,774 $60,148,067 $2,334
4-1

SECTION FOUR

COMPARISON OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS VALUES WITH 

PROMULGATED RULES

As discussed in Section Two, incremental cost-effectiveness is the appropriate measure for

comparing one regulatory option to an alternative, less stringent regulatory option for the same rule. Some

believe that it may also be used to compare cost-effectiveness across rules when considering how the last

increment of stringency in one rule compares to the last increment of stringency in another. For comparing

the overall cost-effectiveness of one rule to another, average cost-effectiveness may be a more appropriate

measure, but must be considered in context with caution. (Average cost-effectiveness can be thought of as

the “increment” between no regulation and the selected option, for any given rule.) In this case, because

only two options are considered and one is dominated, the average and incremental values of the selected

option under the 3MM/120K cutoff are the same.

Table 4-1 presents the incremental cost-effectiveness value for the regulatory option considered

(CP-IL under the 3MM/120K cutoff) and pretreatment standards issued for other industries. The numbers

presented here for this rulemaking are pretax costs, whereas many of the numbers presented for other

effluent guidelines are after-tax costs—that is, the costs actually faced by the firms, not the total cost of the

equipment (which is subsidized by reductions in taxable income). Because of these factors and the fact that

EPA could only conduct and average cost effectiveness for this industry, direct comparisons between this

rulemaking and others cannot be made easily. The equivalent after-tax cost, however, is approximately 70

percent of pretax costs. As Table 3-1 shows, the cost-effectiveness of the primary regulatory option is

$2,295 per pound equivalent removed. Compared to other effluent guidelines, EPA does not consider this

rule to be cost-effective.
4-2

TABLE 4-1

INDUSTRY COMPARISON OF PSES INCREMENTAL COST-EFFECTIVENESS

FOR INDIRECT DISCHARGERS

(Toxic and Nonconventional Pollutants Only; Copper-Based Weightsa

; $ 1981)

Industry

PE Currently Discharged

(thousands)

PE Remaining at Selected

Option

(thousands)

Cost-Effectiveness of

Selected Option(s)

($/PE removed)

Aluminum Forming 1,602 18 155

Battery Manufacturing 1,152 5 15

Canmaking 252 5 38

Coal Miningb NA NA NA

Coastal Oil and Gasb NA NA NA

Coil Coating 2,503 10 10

Copper Forming 34 4 10

Electronics I 75 35 14

Electronics II 260 24 14

Foundries 2,136 18 116

Industrial Laundries 181 142 2,295

Inorganic Chemicals I 3,971 3,004 9

Inorganic Chemicals II 4,760 6 <1

Iron and Steel 5,599 1,404 6

Leather Tanning 16,830 1,899 111

Metal Finishing 11,680 755 10

Nonferrous Metals Forming 189 5 90

Nonferrous Metals Manufacturing I 3,187 19 15

Nonferrous Metals Manufacturing II 38 0.41 12

Offshore Oil and Gasb NA NA NA

OCSPSFc

5,210 72 34

Pharmaceuticals A/C 897 614 96

B/D 90 9 66

Plastics Molding and Forming NA NA NA
TABLE 4-1 (continued)

Industry

PE Currently Discharged

(thousands)

PE Remaining at

Selected Option

(thousands)

Cost-Effectiveness of

Selected Option(s)

($/PE removed)

4-3

Porcelain Enameling 1,565 96 14

Pulp and Paperd 9,539 103 65

Transportation Equipment

Cleaningd

426 383 185

aAlthough toxic weighing factors for priority pollutants varied across these rules, this table reflects the cost-effectiveness at the time

of regulation.

b

Industry has no known or expected indirect discharges.

cReflects costs and removals of both air and water pollutants.

dProposed.
Appendix A

Supporting Documentation for

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis:

Pollutant Loadings Analysis
A-1

Table A-1

Industry Loads and Removals By Pollutant

CP-IL Option, No Cutoff

POTW Removals Toxic

Pollutant Industry Baseline Industry Treated Removals Removal After POTW Weighting PE

Code Analyte Load (lbs/yr) Load (lbs/yr) (lbs/yr) Efficiency (%) (lbs/yr) Factor Removals

T11 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 44,354 24,961 19,393 24% 14,739 4.30E-003 63

T37 1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE 0 0 0 62% 0 1.20E+000 0

N34 2-BUTANONE 37,079 35,068 2,011 18% 1,649 2.20E-005 0

N38 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 11,420 3,026 8,394 28% 6,044 1.80E-002 109

N42 2-PROPANONE 139,704 85,958 53,746 85% 8,062 7.60E-006 0

T22 4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL 10,048 3,544 6,504 63% 2,407 4.30E-003 10

N54 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE 15,946 15,946 0 18% 0 1.20E-004 0

N58 ALPHA-TERPINEOL 11,666 7,759 3,907 18% 3,204 1.00E-003 3

AL ALUMINUM 731,628 491,296 240,332 88% 28,840 6.40E-002 1,846

SB ANTIMONY 27,706 17,615 10,091 72% 2,826 1.90E-001 537

AS ARSENIC 13,064 13,050 14 40% 8 4.00E+000 34

BA BARIUM 72,023 50,147 21,876 35% 14,219 2.00E-003 28

N64 BENZOIC ACID 68,837 68,837 0 81% 0 3.30E-004 0

N66 BENZYL ALCOHOL 71,863 52,597 19,265 33% 12,908 5.60E-003 72

BE BERYLLIUM 39 37 2 61% 1 5.30E+000 4

T66 BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE 143,930 79,273 64,656 60% 25,863 1.10E-001 2,845

BOD BOD 5-DAY (CARBONACEOUS) 111,166,461 102,558,482 8,607,980 91% 774,718 0.00E+000 0

B BORON 34,933 33,031 1,902 14% 1,636 1.80E-001 294

T67 BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE 39,666 13,169 26,497 86% 3,710 2.30E-002 85

CD CADMIUM 5,345 3,077 2,268 91% 204 5.20E+000 1,061

COD CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (COD) 259,751,769 197,873,919 61,877,850 82% 11,138,013 0.00E+000 0

T7 CHLOROBENZENE 2,487 1,708 779 24% 592 2.90E-003 2

T23 CHLOROFORM 128,187 127,943 244 24% 186 2.10E-003 0

CR CHROMIUM 15,303 9,375 5,928 91% 534 2.70E-002 14

CO COBALT 4,940 2,809 2,131 4% 2,046 1.10E-001 225

CU COPPER 132,972 72,944 60,028 84% 9,604 4.70E-001 4,514

T68 DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE 16,435 4,787 11,648 75% 2,912 1.20E-002 35

T69 DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE 13,633 10,108 3,524 33% 2,361 2.20E-001 519

T38 ETHYLBENZENE 38,046 12,064 25,982 33% 17,408 1.40E-003 24

N90 HEXANOIC ACID 8,077 8,072 5 33% 4 3.40E-004 0

FE IRON 1,275,369 531,645 743,724 83% 126,433 5.60E-003 708

T54 ISOPHORONE 47,778 24,228 23,550 62% 8,949 7.30E-004 7

PB LEAD 73,428 27,292 46,137 92% 3,691 1.80E+000 6,644

N95 M-XYLENE 17,712 14,657 3,056 33% 2,047 1.50E-003 3

MN MANGANESE 25,269 12,823 12,446 41% 7,343 1.40E-002 103

HG MERCURY 182 161 22 33% 15 5.00E+002 7,254

T44 METHYLENE CHLORIDE 29,221 11,728 17,493 18% 14,344 4.20E-004 6

MO MOLYBDENUM 9,542 9,488 54 52% 26 2.00E-001 5

N102 N-DECANE 673,669 347,700 325,970 33% 218,400 4.30E-003 939

N103 N-DOCOSANE 16,653 5,872 10,780 94% 647 8.20E-005 0

N104 N-DODECANE 186,284 128,584 57,700 33% 38,659 4.30E-003 166

N105 N-EICOSANE 146,471 12,320 134,150 33% 89,881 4.30E-003 386

N106 N-HEXACOSANE 16,085 4,279 11,806 94% 708 8.20E-005 0

N107 N-HEXADECANE 88,172 24,316 63,856 33% 42,784 4.30E-003 184

N114 N-OCTACOSANE 10,047 3,877 6,170 94% 370 8.20E-005 0

N115 N-OCTADECANE 71,627 11,910 59,717 33% 40,010 4.30E-003 172

N116 N-TETRACOSANE 22,929 8,936 13,993 94% 840 8.20E-005 0

N117 N-TETRADECANE 112,400 21,622 90,778 33% 60,821 4.30E-003 262

N118 N-TRIACONTANE 15,088 7,456 7,632 94% 458 8.20E-005 0

T55 NAPHTHALENE 41,634 19,075 22,560 18% 18,499 1.50E-002 277

NI NICKEL 15,287 10,686 4,601 52% 2,208 3.60E-002 80

N119 O+P XYLENE 11,110 9,824 1,286 33% 861 8.50E-003 7

HEM OIL AND GREASE (AS HEM) 38,519,591 15,314,139 23,205,452 87% 3,016,709 0.00E+000 0

N125 P-CRESOL 0 0 0 72% 0 2.40E-003 0

N126 P-CYMENE 52,508 14,907 37,601 99% 376 4.30E-002 16

N130 PENTAMETHYLBENZENE 0 0 0 91% 0 2.90E-001 0

T65 PHENOL 12,686 12,685 0 95% 0 2.80E-002 0

SE SELENIUM 403 247 156 34% 103 1.10E+000 113

AG SILVER 4,535 3,428 1,107 80% 221 4.70E+001 10,406

T85 TETRACHLOROETHENE 42,301 27,571 14,730 33% 9,869 7.40E-002 730

TL THALLIUM 0 0 0 28% 0 1.40E-001 0

SN TIN 5,854 2,595 3,259 65% 1,140 3.00E-001 342

TI TITANIUM 17,716 11,656 6,061 69% 1,879 2.90E-002 54

T86 TOLUENE 66,379 51,536 14,842 33% 9,944 5.60E-003 56

TOC TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC) 78,340,477 72,196,038 6,144,439 71% 1,781,887 0.00E+000 0

SHEM TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON 13,109,842 2,377,260 10,732,581 74% 2,790,471 0.00E+000 0

TS TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS 62,531,426 32,147,990 30,383,436 91% 2,734,509 0.00E+000 0

T30 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 3,358 3,358 0 33% 0 9.30E-005 0

T87 TRICHLOROETHENE 2,971 1,757 1,214 33% 813 6.30E-002 51

V VANADIUM 2,040 1,822 218 42% 126 6.20E-001 78

Y YTTRIUM 783 771 11 58% 5 0.00E+000 0

ZN ZINC 199,400 68,172 131,228 77% 30,182 5.10E-002 1,539

Totals 568,575,789 425,165,014 143,410,775 23,130,926 42,917

Source: Development Document.
A-2

Table A-2

Industry Loads and Removals By Pollutant

CP-IL Option, 1MM/255K Cutoff

POTW Removals Toxic

Pollutant Industry Baseline Industry Treated Removals Removal After POTW Weighting PE

Code Analyte Load (lbs/yr) Load (lbs/yr) (lbs/yr) Efficiency (%) (lbs/yr) Factor Removals

T11 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 43,682 24,791 18,890 24% 14,357 4.30E-003 62

T37 1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE 0 0 0 62% 0 1.20E+000 0

N34 2-BUTANONE 36,490 34,548 1,942 18% 1,592 2.20E-005 0

N38 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 11,262 3,006 8,257 28% 5,945 1.80E-002 107

N42 2-PROPANONE 137,556 85,282 52,274 85% 7,841 7.60E-006 0

T22 4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL 9,930 3,523 6,406 63% 2,370 4.30E-003 10

N54 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE 15,687 15,687 0 18% 0 1.20E-004 0

N58 ALPHA-TERPINEOL 11,504 7,707 3,798 18% 3,114 1.00E-003 3

AL ALUMINUM 726,162 487,891 238,270 88% 28,592 6.40E-002 1,830

SB ANTIMONY 27,540 17,494 10,046 72% 2,813 1.90E-001 534

AS ARSENIC 12,972 12,958 14 40% 8 4.00E+000 33

BA BARIUM 71,175 49,799 21,376 35% 13,894 2.00E-003 28

N64 BENZOIC ACID 68,136 68,136 0 81% 0 3.30E-004 0

N66 BENZYL ALCOHOL 70,980 52,268 18,712 33% 12,537 5.60E-003 70

BE BERYLLIUM 39 37 2 61% 1 5.30E+000 4

T66 BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE 142,454 78,718 63,736 60% 25,494 1.10E-001 2,804

BOD BOD 5-DAY (CARBONACEOUS) 110,170,372 101,859,551 8,310,821 91% 747,974 0.00E+000 0

B BORON 34,572 32,796 1,776 14% 1,527 1.80E-001 275

T67 BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE 39,223 13,078 26,146 86% 3,660 2.30E-002 84

CD CADMIUM 5,281 3,056 2,226 91% 200 5.20E+000 1,042

COD CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (COD) 256,658,823 196,546,125 60,112,698 82% 10,820,286 0.00E+000 0

T7 CHLOROBENZENE 2,448 1,695 753 24% 572 2.90E-003 2

T23 CHLOROFORM 127,263 127,041 221 24% 168 2.10E-003 0

CR CHROMIUM 15,133 9,312 5,821 91% 524 2.70E-002 14

CO COBALT 4,879 2,791 2,089 4% 2,005 1.10E-001 221

CU COPPER 131,381 72,449 58,932 84% 9,429 4.70E-001 4,432

T68 DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE 16,193 4,754 11,440 75% 2,860 1.20E-002 34

T69 DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE 13,478 10,038 3,440 33% 2,305 2.20E-001 507

T38 ETHYLBENZENE 37,203 11,985 25,217 33% 16,896 1.40E-003 24

N90 HEXANOIC ACID 8,033 8,027 5 33% 4 3.40E-004 0

FE IRON 1,263,722 528,021 735,701 83% 125,069 5.60E-003 700

T54 ISOPHORONE 47,075 24,095 22,979 62% 8,732 7.30E-004 6

PB LEAD 72,288 27,106 45,182 92% 3,615 1.80E+000 6,506

N95 M-XYLENE 17,418 14,553 2,865 33% 1,919 1.50E-003 3

MN MANGANESE 25,012 12,734 12,279 41% 7,244 1.40E-002 101

HG MERCURY 181 160 21 33% 14 5.00E+002 7,154

T44 METHYLENE CHLORIDE 28,698 11,651 17,047 18% 13,978 4.20E-004 6

MO MOLYBDENUM 9,423 9,393 30 52% 15 2.00E-001 3

N102 N-DECANE 663,185 345,248 317,937 33% 213,018 4.30E-003 916

N103 N-DOCOSANE 16,466 5,832 10,635 94% 638 8.20E-005 0

N104 N-DODECANE 183,028 127,690 55,338 33% 37,076 4.30E-003 159

N105 N-EICOSANE 143,083 12,235 130,848 33% 87,668 4.30E-003 377

N106 N-HEXACOSANE 15,821 4,250 11,572 94% 694 8.20E-005 0

N107 N-HEXADECANE 86,604 24,147 62,457 33% 41,846 4.30E-003 180

N114 N-OCTACOSANE 9,903 3,850 6,053 94% 363 8.20E-005 0

N115 N-OCTADECANE 70,187 11,828 58,359 33% 39,100 4.30E-003 168

N116 N-TETRACOSANE 22,677 8,874 13,803 94% 828 8.20E-005 0

N117 N-TETRADECANE 110,160 21,472 88,689 33% 59,421 4.30E-003 256

N118 N-TRIACONTANE 14,928 7,403 7,524 94% 451 8.20E-005 0

T55 NAPHTHALENE 40,915 18,944 21,972 18% 18,017 1.50E-002 270

NI NICKEL 15,148 10,613 4,535 52% 2,177 3.60E-002 78

N119 O+P XYLENE 10,933 9,746 1,186 33% 795 8.50E-003 7

HEM OIL AND GREASE (AS HEM) 37,893,390 15,207,566 22,685,824 87% 2,949,157 0.00E+000 0

N125 P-CRESOL 0 0 0 72% 0 2.40E-003 0

N126 P-CYMENE 51,855 14,803 37,052 99% 371 4.30E-002 16

N130 PENTAMETHYLBENZENE 0 0 0 91% 0 2.90E-001 0

T65 PHENOL 12,588 12,587 0 95% 0 2.80E-002 0

SE SELENIUM 400 246 154 34% 102 1.10E+000 112

AG SILVER 4,494 3,405 1,089 80% 218 4.70E+001 10,236

T85 TETRACHLOROETHENE 41,317 27,387 13,930 33% 9,333 7.40E-002 691

TL THALLIUM 0 0 0 28% 0 1.40E-001 0

SN TIN 5,799 2,578 3,221 65% 1,128 3.00E-001 338

TI TITANIUM 17,597 11,575 6,022 69% 1,867 2.90E-002 54

T86 TOLUENE 65,145 51,127 14,018 33% 9,392 5.60E-003 53

TOC TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC) 77,640,746 71,706,500 5,934,246 71% 1,720,931 0.00E+000 0

SHEM TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON 12,851,536 2,361,108 10,490,428 74% 2,727,511 0.00E+000 0

TS TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS 61,742,432 31,926,179 29,816,253 91% 2,683,463 0.00E+000 0

T30 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 3,308 3,308 0 33% 0 9.30E-005 0

T87 TRICHLOROETHENE 2,929 1,743 1,186 33% 794 6.30E-002 50

V VANADIUM 2,024 1,810 214 42% 124 6.20E-001 77

Y YTTRIUM 777 766 11 58% 5 0.00E+000 0

ZN ZINC 197,065 67,710 129,355 77% 29,752 5.10E-002 1,517

Totals 562,050,106 422,284,785 139,765,321 22,523,797 42,155

Source: Development Document.
A-3

Table A-3

Industry Loads and Removals By Pollutant

CP-IL Option, 3MM/120K Cutoff

POTW Removals Toxic

Pollutant Industry Baseline Industry Treated Removals Removal After POTW Weighting PE

Code Analyte Load (lbs/yr) Load (lbs/yr) (lbs/yr) Efficiency (%) (lbs/yr) Factor Removals

T11 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 40,464 21,771 18,694 24% 14,207 4.30E-003 61

T37 1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE 0 0 0 62% 0 1.20E+000 0

N34 2-BUTANONE 33,983 32,042 1,942 18% 1,592 2.20E-005 0

N38 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 10,198 2,809 7,389 28% 5,320 1.80E-002 96

N42 2-PROPANONE 131,729 79,572 52,157 85% 7,824 7.60E-006 0

T22 4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL 8,850 3,084 5,766 63% 2,133 4.30E-003 9

N54 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE 14,651 14,651 0 18% 0 1.20E-004 0

N58 ALPHA-TERPINEOL 10,908 7,153 3,755 18% 3,079 1.00E-003 3

AL ALUMINUM 669,275 459,847 209,428 88% 25,131 6.40E-002 1,608

SB ANTIMONY 25,088 16,613 8,475 72% 2,373 1.90E-001 451

AS ARSENIC 12,470 12,457 14 40% 8 4.00E+000 33

BA BARIUM 66,280 46,738 19,542 35% 12,702 2.00E-003 25

N64 BENZOIC ACID 63,203 63,203 0 81% 0 3.30E-004 0

N66 BENZYL ALCOHOL 66,640 48,148 18,492 33% 12,390 5.60E-003 69

BE BERYLLIUM 34 32 2 61% 1 5.30E+000 4

T66 BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE 132,825 75,404 57,420 60% 22,968 1.10E-001 2,526

BOD BOD 5-DAY (CARBONACEOUS) 104,120,680 95,859,747 8,260,933 91% 743,484 0.00E+000 0

B BORON 32,242 30,466 1,776 14% 1,527 1.80E-001 275

T67 BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE 37,307 12,546 24,761 86% 3,467 2.30E-002 80

CD CADMIUM 4,886 2,886 2,000 91% 180 5.20E+000 936

COD CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (COD) 236,114,575 179,609,548 56,505,027 82% 10,170,905 0.00E+000 0

T7 CHLOROBENZENE 2,334 1,582 753 24% 572 2.90E-003 2

T23 CHLOROFORM 122,751 122,530 221 24% 168 2.10E-003 0

CR CHROMIUM 14,070 8,606 5,464 91% 492 2.70E-002 13

CO COBALT 4,594 2,540 2,054 4% 1,972 1.10E-001 217

CU COPPER 121,275 67,715 53,560 84% 8,570 4.70E-001 4,028

T68 DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE 15,102 4,507 10,595 75% 2,649 1.20E-002 32

T69 DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE 12,588 9,410 3,178 33% 2,129 2.20E-001 468

T38 ETHYLBENZENE 34,107 10,354 23,753 33% 15,914 1.40E-003 22

N90 HEXANOIC ACID 7,312 7,306 5 33% 4 3.40E-004 0

FE IRON 1,143,483 495,084 648,399 83% 110,228 5.60E-003 617

T54 ISOPHORONE 43,507 21,043 22,464 62% 8,536 7.30E-004 6

PB LEAD 66,481 25,349 41,131 92% 3,291 1.80E+000 5,923

N95 M-XYLENE 16,244 13,392 2,853 33% 1,911 1.50E-003 3

MN MANGANESE 22,988 12,027 10,961 41% 6,467 1.40E-002 91

HG MERCURY 170 151 19 33% 13 5.00E+002 6,356

T44 METHYLENE CHLORIDE 26,294 10,235 16,059 18% 13,169 4.20E-004 6

MO MOLYBDENUM 8,980 8,949 30 52% 15 2.00E-001 3

N102 N-DECANE 624,681 332,492 292,189 33% 195,767 4.30E-003 842

N103 N-DOCOSANE 14,748 5,537 9,212 94% 553 8.20E-005 0

N104 N-DODECANE 165,833 112,032 53,801 33% 36,047 4.30E-003 155

N105 N-EICOSANE 128,002 11,687 116,315 33% 77,931 4.30E-003 335

N106 N-HEXACOSANE 14,359 3,996 10,363 94% 622 8.20E-005 0

N107 N-HEXADECANE 78,869 22,975 55,894 33% 37,449 4.30E-003 161

N114 N-OCTACOSANE 8,887 3,577 5,311 94% 319 8.20E-005 0

N115 N-OCTADECANE 62,912 11,169 51,743 33% 34,668 4.30E-003 149

N116 N-TETRACOSANE 20,654 8,464 12,190 94% 731 8.20E-005 0

N117 N-TETRADECANE 99,447 20,406 79,041 33% 52,958 4.30E-003 228

N118 N-TRIACONTANE 13,750 7,045 6,705 94% 402 8.20E-005 0

T55 NAPHTHALENE 38,379 17,820 20,559 18% 16,859 1.50E-002 253

NI NICKEL 13,973 9,914 4,059 52% 1,948 3.60E-002 70

N119 O+P XYLENE 10,270 9,084 1,186 33% 795 8.50E-003 7

HEM OIL AND GREASE (AS HEM) 35,269,760 14,441,421 20,828,339 87% 2,707,684 0.00E+000 0

N125 P-CRESOL 0 0 0 72% 0 2.40E-003 0

N126 P-CYMENE 49,931 14,211 35,720 99% 357 4.30E-002 15

N130 PENTAMETHYLBENZENE 0 0 0 91% 0 2.90E-001 0

T65 PHENOL 11,871 11,871 0 95% 0 2.80E-002 0

SE SELENIUM 352 215 137 34% 91 1.10E+000 100

AG SILVER 4,250 3,224 1,026 80% 205 4.70E+001 9,643

T85 TETRACHLOROETHENE 37,725 24,074 13,650 33% 9,146 7.40E-002 677

TL THALLIUM 0 0 0 28% 0 1.40E-001 0

SN TIN 5,133 2,238 2,895 65% 1,013 3.00E-001 304

TI TITANIUM 16,066 10,776 5,290 69% 1,640 2.90E-002 48

T86 TOLUENE 61,674 47,706 13,968 33% 9,358 5.60E-003 52

TOC TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC) 72,968,740 67,073,873 5,894,867 71% 1,709,511 0.00E+000 0

SHEM TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON 11,766,277 2,195,097 9,571,180 74% 2,488,507 0.00E+000 0

TS TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS 56,330,170 29,835,581 26,494,589 91% 2,384,513 0.00E+000 0

T30 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 3,146 3,146 0 33% 0 9.30E-005 0

T87 TRICHLOROETHENE 2,820 1,634 1,186 33% 794 6.30E-002 50

V VANADIUM 1,890 1,684 205 42% 119 6.20E-001 74

Y YTTRIUM 737 726 11 58% 5 0.00E+000 0

ZN ZINC 178,466 62,860 115,606 77% 26,589 5.10E-002 1,356

Totals 521,262,341 391,526,031 129,736,310 21,001,969 38,483

Source: Development Document.
A-4

Table A-4

Industry Loads and Removals By Pollutant

CP-IL Option, 5MM/255K Cutoff

POTW Removals Toxic

Pollutant Industry Baseline Industry Treated Removals Removal After POTW Weighting PE

Code Analyte Load (lbs/yr) Load (lbs/yr) (lbs/yr) Efficiency (%) (lbs/yr) Factor Removals

T11 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 33,432 15,838 17,593 24% 13,371 4.30E-003 57

T37 1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE 0 0 0 62% 0 1.20E+000 0

N34 2-BUTANONE 28,704 26,763 1,942 18% 1,592 2.20E-005 0

N38 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 8,074 2,277 5,798 28% 4,174 1.80E-002 75

N42 2-PROPANONE 113,260 64,625 48,634 85% 7,295 7.60E-006 0

T22 4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL 6,888 2,122 4,766 63% 1,764 4.30E-003 8

N54 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE 12,341 12,341 0 18% 0 1.20E-004 0

N58 ALPHA-TERPINEOL 9,354 5,750 3,604 18% 2,955 1.00E-003 3

AL ALUMINUM 537,651 379,438 158,214 88% 18,986 6.40E-002 1,215

SB ANTIMONY 19,694 13,900 5,794 72% 1,622 1.90E-001 308

AS ARSENIC 10,704 10,691 13 40% 8 4.00E+000 31

BA BARIUM 54,111 38,159 15,952 35% 10,369 2.00E-003 21

N64 BENZOIC ACID 52,420 52,420 0 81% 0 3.30E-004 0

N66 BENZYL ALCOHOL 56,807 38,730 18,077 33% 12,111 5.60E-003 68

BE BERYLLIUM 26 24 2 61% 1 5.30E+000 4

T66 BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE 107,755 64,163 43,592 60% 17,437 1.10E-001 1,918

BOD BOD 5-DAY (CARBONACEOUS) 87,450,551 79,935,733 7,514,818 91% 676,334 0.00E+000 0

B BORON 26,941 25,173 1,767 14% 1,520 1.80E-001 274

T67 BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE 32,124 10,699 21,425 86% 2,999 2.30E-002 69

CD CADMIUM 4,002 2,393 1,608 91% 145 5.20E+000 753

COD CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (COD) 189,588,950 140,233,731 49,355,219 82% 8,883,939 0.00E+000 0

T7 CHLOROBENZENE 2,053 1,320 733 24% 557 2.90E-003 2

T23 CHLOROFORM 105,870 105,654 216 24% 165 2.10E-003 0

CR CHROMIUM 11,402 6,840 4,562 91% 411 2.70E-002 11

CO COBALT 3,907 1,970 1,936 4% 1,859 1.10E-001 204

CU COPPER 97,610 55,004 42,605 84% 6,817 4.70E-001 3,204

T68 DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE 12,228 3,762 8,465 75% 2,116 1.20E-002 25

T69 DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE 10,317 7,673 2,644 33% 1,771 2.20E-001 390

T38 ETHYLBENZENE 26,947 6,884 20,064 33% 13,443 1.40E-003 19

N90 HEXANOIC ACID 5,762 5,757 5 33% 4 3.40E-004 0

FE IRON 895,613 404,754 490,858 83% 83,446 5.60E-003 467

T54 ISOPHORONE 36,677 14,969 21,708 62% 8,249 7.30E-004 6

PB LEAD 53,467 20,616 32,851 92% 2,628 1.80E+000 4,731

N95 M-XYLENE 13,596 10,891 2,706 33% 1,813 1.50E-003 3

MN MANGANESE 18,489 9,966 8,523 41% 5,028 1.40E-002 70

HG MERCURY 141 126 15 33% 10 5.00E+002 4,953

T44 METHYLENE CHLORIDE 21,649 7,229 14,420 18% 11,824 4.20E-004 5

MO MOLYBDENUM 7,642 7,614 28 52% 14 2.00E-001 3

N102 N-DECANE 517,127 285,672 231,455 33% 155,075 4.30E-003 667

N103 N-DOCOSANE 11,271 4,633 6,638 94% 398 8.20E-005 0

N104 N-DODECANE 128,980 81,131 47,849 33% 32,059 4.30E-003 138

N105 N-EICOSANE 99,826 9,894 89,933 33% 60,255 4.30E-003 259

N106 N-HEXACOSANE 11,166 3,280 7,885 94% 473 8.20E-005 0

N107 N-HEXADECANE 62,162 19,295 42,867 33% 28,721 4.30E-003 124

N114 N-OCTACOSANE 6,844 2,858 3,987 94% 239 8.20E-005 0

N115 N-OCTADECANE 48,883 9,244 39,639 33% 26,558 4.30E-003 114

N116 N-TETRACOSANE 16,413 7,146 9,267 94% 556 8.20E-005 0

N117 N-TETRADECANE 77,866 17,101 60,765 33% 40,712 4.30E-003 175

N118 N-TRIACONTANE 11,128 5,916 5,212 94% 313 8.20E-005 0

T55 NAPHTHALENE 31,341 14,635 16,706 18% 13,699 1.50E-002 205

NI NICKEL 11,300 8,050 3,251 52% 1,560 3.60E-002 56

N119 O+P XYLENE 8,716 7,570 1,146 33% 768 8.50E-003 7

HEM OIL AND GREASE (AS HEM) 28,563,674 12,089,837 16,473,837 87% 2,141,599 0.00E+000 0

N125 P-CRESOL 0 0 0 72% 0 2.40E-003 0

N126 P-CYMENE 43,735 12,142 31,593 99% 316 4.30E-002 14

N130 PENTAMETHYLBENZENE 0 0 0 91% 0 2.90E-001 0

T65 PHENOL 9,985 9,984 0 95% 0 2.80E-002 0

SE SELENIUM 264 151 114 34% 75 1.10E+000 82

AG SILVER 3,591 2,685 906 80% 181 4.70E+001 8,514

T85 TETRACHLOROETHENE 30,356 17,410 12,945 33% 8,673 7.40E-002 642

TL THALLIUM 0 0 0 28% 0 1.40E-001 0

SN TIN 3,893 1,552 2,341 65% 819 3.00E-001 246

TI TITANIUM 12,641 8,672 3,969 69% 1,230 2.90E-002 36

T86 TOLUENE 51,118 38,492 12,626 33% 8,460 5.60E-003 47

TOC TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC) 60,704,055 55,307,428 5,396,627 71% 1,565,022 0.00E+000 0

SHEM TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON 9,349,866 1,763,841 7,586,025 74% 1,972,367 0.00E+000 0

TS TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS 44,708,381 24,186,232 20,522,150 91% 1,846,993 0.00E+000 0

T30 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 2,793 2,793 0 33% 0 9.30E-005 0

T87 TRICHLOROETHENE 2,543 1,375 1,168 33% 783 6.30E-002 49

V VANADIUM 1,556 1,375 181 42% 105 6.20E-001 65

Y YTTRIUM 621 612 10 58% 4 0.00E+000 0

ZN ZINC 141,259 50,361 90,897 77% 20,906 5.10E-002 1,066

Totals 424,150,513 315,577,367 108,573,146 17,725,696 31,403

Source: Development Document.
A-5

Table A-5

Industry Loads and Removals By Pollutant

DAF-IL Option, No Cutoff

POTW Removals Toxic

Pollutant Industry Baseline Industry Treated Removals Removal After POTW Weighting PE

Code Analyte Load (lbs/yr) Load (lbs/yr) (lbs/yr) Efficiency (%) (lbs/yr) Factor Removals

T11 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 44,354 2,377 41,976 24% 31,902 4.30E-003 137

T37 1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE 0 0 0 62% 0 1.20E+000 0

N34 2-BUTANONE 37,079 37,078 0 18% 0 2.20E-005 0

N38 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 11,420 9,803 1,618 28% 1,165 1.80E-002 21

N42 2-PROPANONE 139,704 139,280 424 85% 64 7.60E-006 0

T22 4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL 10,048 9,364 684 63% 253 4.30E-003 1

N54 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE 15,946 15,786 159 18% 131 1.20E-004 0

N58 ALPHA-TERPINEOL 11,666 11,643 23 18% 19 1.00E-003 0

AL ALUMINUM 731,628 489,482 242,147 88% 29,058 6.40E-002 1,860

SB ANTIMONY 27,706 19,540 8,167 72% 2,287 1.90E-001 434

AS ARSENIC 13,064 13,063 0 40% 0 4.00E+000 1

BA BARIUM 72,023 43,084 28,939 35% 18,811 2.00E-003 38

N64 BENZOIC ACID 68,837 68,014 823 81% 156 3.30E-004 0

N66 BENZYL ALCOHOL 71,863 71,862 0 33% 0 5.60E-003 0

BE BERYLLIUM 39 39 0 61% 0 5.30E+000 0

T66 BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE 143,930 85,188 58,741 60% 23,497 1.10E-001 2,585

BOD BOD 5-DAY (CARBONACEOUS) 111,166,461 105,943,546 5,222,915 91% 470,062 0.00E+000 0

B BORON 34,933 34,376 557 14% 479 1.80E-001 86

T67 BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE 39,666 25,872 13,795 86% 1,931 2.30E-002 44

CD CADMIUM 5,345 3,607 1,737 91% 156 5.20E+000 813

COD CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (COD) 259,751,769 180,887,567 78,864,203 82% 14,195,556 0.00E+000 0

T7 CHLOROBENZENE 2,487 1,616 871 24% 662 2.90E-003 2

T23 CHLOROFORM 128,187 128,182 5 24% 4 2.10E-003 0

CR CHROMIUM 15,303 11,193 4,110 91% 370 2.70E-002 10

CO COBALT 4,940 3,704 1,237 4% 1,187 1.10E-001 131

CU COPPER 132,972 89,894 43,078 84% 6,892 4.70E-001 3,239

T68 DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE 16,435 12,065 4,370 75% 1,092 1.20E-002 13

T69 DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE 13,633 9,687 3,946 33% 2,644 2.20E-001 582

T38 ETHYLBENZENE 38,046 5,741 32,305 33% 21,645 1.40E-003 30

N90 HEXANOIC ACID 8,077 8,077 0 33% 0 3.40E-004 0

FE IRON 1,275,369 614,767 660,602 83% 112,302 5.60E-003 629

T54 ISOPHORONE 47,778 47,778 0 62% 0 7.30E-004 0

PB LEAD 73,428 33,574 39,854 92% 3,188 1.80E+000 5,739

N95 M-XYLENE 17,712 16,512 1,200 33% 804 1.50E-003 1

MN MANGANESE 25,269 12,989 12,280 41% 7,245 1.40E-002 101

HG MERCURY 182 155 28 33% 18 5.00E+002 9,239

T44 METHYLENE CHLORIDE 29,221 27,554 1,667 18% 1,367 4.20E-004 1

MO MOLYBDENUM 9,542 8,803 740 52% 355 2.00E-001 71

N102 N-DECANE 673,669 377,128 296,541 33% 198,683 4.30E-003 854

N103 N-DOCOSANE 16,653 6,818 9,834 94% 590 8.20E-005 0

N104 N-DODECANE 186,284 52,336 133,947 33% 89,745 4.30E-003 386

N105 N-EICOSANE 146,471 14,929 131,541 33% 88,133 4.30E-003 379

N106 N-HEXACOSANE 16,085 4,796 11,289 94% 677 8.20E-005 0

N107 N-HEXADECANE 88,172 27,715 60,457 33% 40,506 4.30E-003 174

N114 N-OCTACOSANE 10,047 3,383 6,664 94% 400 8.20E-005 0

N115 N-OCTADECANE 71,627 15,051 56,576 33% 37,906 4.30E-003 163

N116 N-TETRACOSANE 22,929 9,701 13,228 94% 794 8.20E-005 0

N117 N-TETRADECANE 112,400 24,465 87,934 33% 58,916 4.30E-003 253

N118 N-TRIACONTANE 15,088 7,317 7,771 94% 466 8.20E-005 0

T55 NAPHTHALENE 41,634 20,447 21,188 18% 17,374 1.50E-002 261

NI NICKEL 15,287 10,763 4,524 52% 2,172 3.60E-002 78

N119 O+P XYLENE 11,110 10,799 311 33% 209 8.50E-003 2

HEM OIL AND GREASE (AS HEM) 38,519,591 16,035,628 22,483,963 87% 2,922,915 0.00E+000 0

N125 P-CRESOL 0 0 0 72% 0 2.40E-003 0

N126 P-CYMENE 52,508 19,495 33,013 99% 330 4.30E-002 14

N130 PENTAMETHYLBENZENE 0 0 0 91% 0 2.90E-001 0

T65 PHENOL 12,686 12,678 7 95% 0 2.80E-002 0

SE SELENIUM 403 403 0 34% 0 1.10E+000 0

AG SILVER 4,535 4,063 472 80% 94 4.70E+001 4,437

T85 TETRACHLOROETHENE 42,301 20,512 21,790 33% 14,599 7.40E-002 1,080

TL THALLIUM 0 0 0 28% 0 1.40E-001 0

SN TIN 5,854 4,934 920 65% 322 3.00E-001 97

TI TITANIUM 17,716 9,132 8,584 69% 2,661 2.90E-002 77

T86 TOLUENE 66,379 46,162 20,217 33% 13,545 5.60E-003 76

TOC TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC) 78,340,477 72,858,026 5,482,451 71% 1,589,911 0.00E+000 0

SHEM TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON 13,109,842 2,671,268 10,438,574 74% 2,714,029 0.00E+000 0

TS TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS 62,531,426 29,879,620 32,651,807 91% 2,938,663 0.00E+000 0

T30 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 3,358 3,358 0 33% 0 9.30E-005 0

T87 TRICHLOROETHENE 2,971 2,971 0 33% 0 6.30E-002 0

V VANADIUM 2,040 1,790 249 42% 145 6.20E-001 90

Y YTTRIUM 783 740 42 58% 18 0.00E+000 0

ZN ZINC 199,400 112,848 86,553 77% 19,907 5.10E-002 1,015

Totals 568,575,789 411,212,139 157,363,650 25,689,012 35,245

Source: Development Document.
A-6

Table A-6

Industry Loads and Removals By Pollutant

DAF-IL Option, 1MM/255K Cutoff

POTW Removals Toxic

Pollutant Industry Baseline Industry Treated Removals Removal After POTW Weighting PE

Code Analyte Load (lbs/yr) Load (lbs/yr) (lbs/yr) Efficiency (%) (lbs/yr) Factor Removals

T11 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 43,682 2,372 41,310 24% 31,396 4.30E-003 135

T37 1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE 0 0 0 62% 0 1.20E+000 0

N34 2-BUTANONE 36,490 36,490 0 18% 0 2.20E-005 0

N38 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 11,262 9,731 1,531 28% 1,102 1.80E-002 20

N42 2-PROPANONE 137,556 137,160 396 85% 59 7.60E-006 0

T22 4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL 9,930 9,309 621 63% 230 4.30E-003 1

N54 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE 15,687 15,573 114 18% 93 1.20E-004 0

N58 ALPHA-TERPINEOL 11,504 11,482 23 18% 19 1.00E-003 0

AL ALUMINUM 726,162 486,090 240,072 88% 28,809 6.40E-002 1,844

SB ANTIMONY 27,540 19,407 8,132 72% 2,277 1.90E-001 433

AS ARSENIC 12,972 12,972 0 40% 0 4.00E+000 1

BA BARIUM 71,175 42,786 28,389 35% 18,453 2.00E-003 37

N64 BENZOIC ACID 68,136 67,346 790 81% 150 3.30E-004 0

N66 BENZYL ALCOHOL 70,980 70,980 0 33% 0 5.60E-003 0

BE BERYLLIUM 39 39 0 61% 0 5.30E+000 0

T66 BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE 142,454 84,589 57,865 60% 23,146 1.10E-001 2,546

BOD BOD 5-DAY (CARBONACEOUS) 110,170,372 105,209,109 4,961,263 91% 446,514 0.00E+000 0

B BORON 34,572 34,111 460 14% 396 1.80E-001 71

T67 BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE 39,223 25,686 13,537 86% 1,895 2.30E-002 44

CD CADMIUM 5,281 3,583 1,699 91% 153 5.20E+000 795

COD CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (COD) 256,658,823 179,662,938 76,995,885 82% 13,859,259 0.00E+000 0

T7 CHLOROBENZENE 2,448 1,605 843 24% 641 2.90E-003 2

T23 CHLOROFORM 127,263 127,257 5 24% 4 2.10E-003 0

CR CHROMIUM 15,133 11,119 4,014 91% 361 2.70E-002 10

CO COBALT 4,879 3,678 1,201 4% 1,153 1.10E-001 127

CU COPPER 131,381 89,281 42,100 84% 6,736 4.70E-001 3,166

T68 DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE 16,193 11,978 4,216 75% 1,054 1.20E-002 13

T69 DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE 13,478 9,620 3,858 33% 2,585 2.20E-001 569

T38 ETHYLBENZENE 37,203 5,705 31,498 33% 21,104 1.40E-003 30

N90 HEXANOIC ACID 8,033 8,033 0 33% 0 3.40E-004 0

FE IRON 1,263,722 610,539 653,182 83% 111,041 5.60E-003 622

T54 ISOPHORONE 47,075 47,075 0 62% 0 7.30E-004 0

PB LEAD 72,288 33,345 38,943 92% 3,115 1.80E+000 5,608

N95 M-XYLENE 17,418 16,380 1,038 33% 696 1.50E-003 1

MN MANGANESE 25,012 12,899 12,114 41% 7,147 1.40E-002 100

HG MERCURY 181 154 27 33% 18 5.00E+002 9,125

T44 METHYLENE CHLORIDE 28,698 27,348 1,349 18% 1,106 4.20E-004 0

MO MOLYBDENUM 9,423 8,734 690 52% 331 2.00E-001 66

N102 N-DECANE 663,185 374,463 288,722 33% 193,444 4.30E-003 832

N103 N-DOCOSANE 16,466 6,771 9,696 94% 582 8.20E-005 0

N104 N-DODECANE 183,028 52,010 131,018 33% 87,782 4.30E-003 377

N105 N-EICOSANE 143,083 14,825 128,258 33% 85,933 4.30E-003 370

N106 N-HEXACOSANE 15,821 4,763 11,058 94% 664 8.20E-005 0

N107 N-HEXADECANE 86,604 27,522 59,082 33% 39,585 4.30E-003 170

N114 N-OCTACOSANE 9,903 3,360 6,544 94% 393 8.20E-005 0

N115 N-OCTADECANE 70,187 14,946 55,240 33% 37,011 4.30E-003 159

N116 N-TETRACOSANE 22,677 9,633 13,044 94% 783 8.20E-005 0

N117 N-TETRADECANE 110,160 24,295 85,866 33% 57,530 4.30E-003 247

N118 N-TRIACONTANE 14,928 7,266 7,662 94% 460 8.20E-005 0

T55 NAPHTHALENE 40,915 20,306 20,609 18% 16,900 1.50E-002 253

NI NICKEL 15,148 10,689 4,459 52% 2,140 3.60E-002 77

N119 O+P XYLENE 10,933 10,696 237 33% 159 8.50E-003 1

HEM OIL AND GREASE (AS HEM) 37,893,390 15,923,719 21,969,671 87% 2,856,057 0.00E+000 0

N125 P-CRESOL 0 0 0 72% 0 2.40E-003 0

N126 P-CYMENE 51,855 19,359 32,496 99% 325 4.30E-002 14

N130 PENTAMETHYLBENZENE 0 0 0 91% 0 2.90E-001 0

T65 PHENOL 12,588 12,580 7 95% 0 2.80E-002 0

SE SELENIUM 400 400 0 34% 0 1.10E+000 0

AG SILVER 4,494 4,035 459 80% 92 4.70E+001 4,311

T85 TETRACHLOROETHENE 41,317 20,388 20,929 33% 14,023 7.40E-002 1,038

TL THALLIUM 0 0 0 28% 0 1.40E-001 0

SN TIN 5,799 4,903 897 65% 314 3.00E-001 94

TI TITANIUM 17,597 9,069 8,528 69% 2,644 2.90E-002 77

T86 TOLUENE 65,145 45,834 19,311 33% 12,938 5.60E-003 72

TOC TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC) 77,640,746 72,361,602 5,279,144 71% 1,530,952 0.00E+000 0

SHEM TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON 12,851,536 2,653,006 10,198,530 74% 2,651,618 0.00E+000 0

TS TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS 61,742,432 29,673,939 32,068,493 91% 2,886,164 0.00E+000 0

T30 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 3,308 3,308 0 33% 0 9.30E-005 0

T87 TRICHLOROETHENE 2,929 2,929 0 33% 0 6.30E-002 0

V VANADIUM 2,024 1,778 245 42% 142 6.20E-001 88

Y YTTRIUM 777 735 42 58% 18 0.00E+000 0

ZN ZINC 197,065 112,070 84,995 77% 19,549 5.10E-002 997

Totals 562,050,106 408,397,699 153,652,407 25,069,242 34,542

Source: Development Document.
A-7

Table A-7

Industry Loads and Removals By Pollutant

DAF-IL Option, 3MM/120K Cutoff

POTW Removals Toxic

Pollutant Industry Baseline Industry Treated Removals Removal After POTW Weighting PE

Code Analyte Load (lbs/yr) Load (lbs/yr) (lbs/yr) Efficiency (%) (lbs/yr) Factor Removals

T11 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 40,464 2,255 38,210 24% 29,039 4.30E-003 125

T37 1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE 0 0 0 62% 0 1.20E+000 0

N34 2-BUTANONE 33,983 33,983 0 18% 0 2.20E-005 0

N38 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 10,198 8,683 1,515 28% 1,091 1.80E-002 20

N42 2-PROPANONE 131,729 131,334 396 85% 59 7.60E-006 0

T22 4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL 8,850 8,229 621 63% 230 4.30E-003 1

N54 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE 14,651 14,537 114 18% 93 1.20E-004 0

N58 ALPHA-TERPINEOL 10,908 10,885 23 18% 19 1.00E-003 0

AL ALUMINUM 669,275 458,327 210,948 88% 25,314 6.40E-002 1,620

SB ANTIMONY 25,088 18,264 6,824 72% 1,911 1.90E-001 363

AS ARSENIC 12,470 12,470 0 40% 0 4.00E+000 1

BA BARIUM 66,280 40,820 25,460 35% 16,549 2.00E-003 33

N64 BENZOIC ACID 63,203 62,413 790 81% 150 3.30E-004 0

N66 BENZYL ALCOHOL 66,640 66,640 0 33% 0 5.60E-003 0

BE BERYLLIUM 34 34 0 61% 0 5.30E+000 0

T66 BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE 132,825 80,421 52,404 60% 20,962 1.10E-001 2,306

BOD BOD 5-DAY (CARBONACEOUS) 104,120,680 99,172,611 4,948,069 91% 445,326 0.00E+000 0

B BORON 32,242 31,782 460 14% 396 1.80E-001 71

T67 BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE 37,307 23,856 13,451 86% 1,883 2.30E-002 43

CD CADMIUM 4,886 3,342 1,544 91% 139 5.20E+000 723

COD CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (COD) 236,114,575 165,442,212 70,672,363 82% 12,721,025 0.00E+000 0

T7 CHLOROBENZENE 2,334 1,493 841 24% 639 2.90E-003 2

T23 CHLOROFORM 122,751 122,746 5 24% 4 2.10E-003 0

CR CHROMIUM 14,070 10,171 3,898 91% 351 2.70E-002 9

CO COBALT 4,594 3,397 1,198 4% 1,150 1.10E-001 126

CU COPPER 121,275 82,192 39,082 84% 6,253 4.70E-001 2,939

T68 DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE 15,102 10,939 4,163 75% 1,041 1.20E-002 12

T69 DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE 12,588 9,058 3,530 33% 2,365 2.20E-001 520

T38 ETHYLBENZENE 34,107 5,031 29,076 33% 19,481 1.40E-003 27

N90 HEXANOIC ACID 7,312 7,312 0 33% 0 3.40E-004 0

FE IRON 1,143,483 566,093 577,390 83% 98,156 5.60E-003 550

T54 ISOPHORONE 43,507 43,507 0 62% 0 7.30E-004 0

PB LEAD 66,481 30,729 35,752 92% 2,860 1.80E+000 5,148

N95 M-XYLENE 16,244 15,206 1,038 33% 696 1.50E-003 1

MN MANGANESE 22,988 12,167 10,821 41% 6,384 1.40E-002 89

HG MERCURY 170 146 24 33% 16 5.00E+002 8,002

T44 METHYLENE CHLORIDE 26,294 24,944 1,349 18% 1,106 4.20E-004 0

MO MOLYBDENUM 8,980 8,290 690 52% 331 2.00E-001 66

N102 N-DECANE 624,681 357,429 267,251 33% 179,058 4.30E-003 770

N103 N-DOCOSANE 14,748 6,345 8,403 94% 504 8.20E-005 0

N104 N-DODECANE 165,833 48,770 117,063 33% 78,432 4.30E-003 337

N105 N-EICOSANE 128,002 13,916 114,086 33% 76,438 4.30E-003 329

N106 N-HEXACOSANE 14,359 4,438 9,921 94% 595 8.20E-005 0

N107 N-HEXADECANE 78,869 25,876 52,992 33% 35,505 4.30E-003 153

N114 N-OCTACOSANE 8,887 3,162 5,726 94% 344 8.20E-005 0

N115 N-OCTADECANE 62,912 13,862 49,051 33% 32,864 4.30E-003 141

N116 N-TETRACOSANE 20,654 9,114 11,540 94% 692 8.20E-005 0

N117 N-TETRADECANE 99,447 22,833 76,614 33% 51,331 4.30E-003 221

N118 N-TRIACONTANE 13,750 6,929 6,821 94% 409 8.20E-005 0

T55 NAPHTHALENE 38,379 18,987 19,392 18% 15,902 1.50E-002 239

NI NICKEL 13,973 9,979 3,994 52% 1,917 3.60E-002 69

N119 O+P XYLENE 10,270 10,033 237 33% 159 8.50E-003 1

HEM OIL AND GREASE (AS HEM) 35,269,760 15,052,637 20,217,122 87% 2,628,226 0.00E+000 0

N125 P-CRESOL 0 0 0 72% 0 2.40E-003 0

N126 P-CYMENE 49,931 18,155 31,776 99% 318 4.30E-002 14

N130 PENTAMETHYLBENZENE 0 0 0 91% 0 2.90E-001 0

T65 PHENOL 11,871 11,864 7 95% 0 2.80E-002 0

SE SELENIUM 352 352 0 34% 0 1.10E+000 0

AG SILVER 4,250 3,793 457 80% 91 4.70E+001 4,296

T85 TETRACHLOROETHENE 37,725 17,821 19,904 33% 13,335 7.40E-002 987

TL THALLIUM 0 0 0 28% 0 1.40E-001 0

SN TIN 5,133 4,255 878 65% 307 3.00E-001 92

TI TITANIUM 16,066 8,665 7,400 69% 2,294 2.90E-002 67

T86 TOLUENE 61,674 42,501 19,173 33% 12,846 5.60E-003 72

TOC TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC) 72,968,740 67,714,343 5,254,397 71% 1,523,775 0.00E+000 0

SHEM TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON 11,766,277 2,446,918 9,319,359 74% 2,423,033 0.00E+000 0

TS TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS 56,330,170 27,935,334 28,394,836 91% 2,555,535 0.00E+000 0

T30 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 3,146 3,146 0 33% 0 9.30E-005 0

T87 TRICHLOROETHENE 2,820 2,820 0 33% 0 6.30E-002 0

V VANADIUM 1,890 1,659 231 42% 134 6.20E-001 83

Y YTTRIUM 737 696 41 58% 17 0.00E+000 0

ZN ZINC 178,466 101,143 77,323 77% 17,784 5.10E-002 907

Totals 521,262,341 380,494,295 140,768,046 23,056,868 31,577

Source: Development Document.
A-8

Table A-8

Industry Loads and Removals By Pollutant

DAF-IL Option, 5MM/255K Cutoff

POTW Removals Toxic

Pollutant Industry Baseline Industry Treated Removals Removal After POTW Weighting PE

Code Analyte Load (lbs/yr) Load (lbs/yr) (lbs/yr) Efficiency (%) (lbs/yr) Factor Removals

T11 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 33,432 1,719 31,712 24% 24,101 4.30E-003 104

T37 1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE 0 0 0 62% 0 1.20E+000 0

N34 2-BUTANONE 28,704 28,704 0 18% 0 2.20E-005 0

N38 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 8,074 6,721 1,354 28% 975 1.80E-002 18

N42 2-PROPANONE 113,260 112,864 395 85% 59 7.60E-006 0

T22 4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL 6,888 6,290 598 63% 221 4.30E-003 1

N54 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE 12,341 12,227 114 18% 93 1.20E-004 0

N58 ALPHA-TERPINEOL 9,354 9,331 23 18% 19 1.00E-003 0

AL ALUMINUM 537,651 378,481 159,170 88% 19,100 6.40E-002 1,222

SB ANTIMONY 19,694 15,002 4,692 72% 1,314 1.90E-001 250

AS ARSENIC 10,704 10,704 0 40% 0 4.00E+000 1

BA BARIUM 54,111 34,436 19,675 35% 12,789 2.00E-003 26

N64 BENZOIC ACID 52,420 51,630 790 81% 150 3.30E-004 0

N66 BENZYL ALCOHOL 56,807 56,807 0 33% 0 5.60E-003 0

BE BERYLLIUM 26 26 0 61% 0 5.30E+000 0

T66 BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE 107,755 67,470 40,286 60% 16,114 1.10E-001 1,773

BOD BOD 5-DAY (CARBONACEOUS) 87,450,551 82,919,296 4,531,255 91% 407,813 0.00E+000 0

B BORON 26,941 26,481 460 14% 396 1.80E-001 71

T67 BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE 32,124 19,564 12,560 86% 1,758 2.30E-002 40

CD CADMIUM 4,002 2,699 1,303 91% 117 5.20E+000 610

COD CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (COD) 189,588,950 130,590,755 58,998,195 82% 10,619,675 0.00E+000 0

T7 CHLOROBENZENE 2,053 1,236 817 24% 621 2.90E-003 2

T23 CHLOROFORM 105,870 105,865 5 24% 4 2.10E-003 0

CR CHROMIUM 11,402 7,964 3,438 91% 309 2.70E-002 8

CO COBALT 3,907 2,752 1,155 4% 1,109 1.10E-001 122

CU COPPER 97,610 65,063 32,547 84% 5,207 4.70E-001 2,448

T68 DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE 12,228 8,654 3,574 75% 893 1.20E-002 11

T69 DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE 10,317 7,451 2,866 33% 1,920 2.20E-001 422

T38 ETHYLBENZENE 26,947 3,533 23,414 33% 15,688 1.40E-003 22

N90 HEXANOIC ACID 5,762 5,762 0 33% 0 3.40E-004 0

FE IRON 895,613 452,699 442,913 83% 75,295 5.60E-003 422

T54 ISOPHORONE 36,677 36,677 0 62% 0 7.30E-004 0

PB LEAD 53,467 24,289 29,178 92% 2,334 1.80E+000 4,202

N95 M-XYLENE 13,596 12,597 999 33% 669 1.50E-003 1

MN MANGANESE 18,489 10,057 8,432 41% 4,975 1.40E-002 70

HG MERCURY 141 123 18 33% 12 5.00E+002 6,046

T44 METHYLENE CHLORIDE 21,649 20,359 1,290 18% 1,058 4.20E-004 0

MO MOLYBDENUM 7,642 7,003 639 52% 307 2.00E-001 61

N102 N-DECANE 517,127 302,042 215,085 33% 144,107 4.30E-003 620

N103 N-DOCOSANE 11,271 5,173 6,098 94% 366 8.20E-005 0

N104 N-DODECANE 128,980 39,205 89,775 33% 60,149 4.30E-003 259

N105 N-EICOSANE 99,826 11,384 88,442 33% 59,256 4.30E-003 255

N106 N-HEXACOSANE 11,166 3,576 7,590 94% 455 8.20E-005 0

N107 N-HEXADECANE 62,162 21,226 40,936 33% 27,427 4.30E-003 118

N114 N-OCTACOSANE 6,844 2,597 4,247 94% 255 8.20E-005 0

N115 N-OCTADECANE 48,883 11,063 37,820 33% 25,339 4.30E-003 109

N116 N-TETRACOSANE 16,413 7,574 8,839 94% 530 8.20E-005 0

N117 N-TETRADECANE 77,866 18,716 59,149 33% 39,630 4.30E-003 170

N118 N-TRIACONTANE 11,128 5,843 5,284 94% 317 8.20E-005 0

T55 NAPHTHALENE 31,341 15,414 15,927 18% 13,061 1.50E-002 196

NI NICKEL 11,300 8,094 3,206 52% 1,539 3.60E-002 55

N119 O+P XYLENE 8,716 8,480 237 33% 158 8.50E-003 1

HEM OIL AND GREASE (AS HEM) 28,563,674 12,491,092 16,072,582 87% 2,089,436 0.00E+000 0

N125 P-CRESOL 0 0 0 72% 0 2.40E-003 0

N126 P-CYMENE 43,735 14,814 28,922 99% 289 4.30E-002 12

N130 PENTAMETHYLBENZENE 0 0 0 91% 0 2.90E-001 0

T65 PHENOL 9,985 9,977 7 95% 0 2.80E-002 0

SE SELENIUM 264 264 0 34% 0 1.10E+000 0

AG SILVER 3,591 3,153 438 80% 88 4.70E+001 4,114

T85 TETRACHLOROETHENE 30,356 12,418 17,937 33% 12,018 7.40E-002 889

TL THALLIUM 0 0 0 28% 0 1.40E-001 0

SN TIN 3,893 3,089 805 65% 282 3.00E-001 84

TI TITANIUM 12,641 7,330 5,312 69% 1,647 2.90E-002 48

T86 TOLUENE 51,118 33,985 17,132 33% 11,479 5.60E-003 64

TOC TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC) 60,704,055 55,892,337 4,811,719 71% 1,395,398 0.00E+000 0

SHEM TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON 9,349,866 1,935,173 7,414,694 74% 1,927,820 0.00E+000 0

TS TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS 44,708,381 22,990,267 21,718,114 91% 1,954,630 0.00E+000 0

T30 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 2,793 2,793 0 33% 0 9.30E-005 0

T87 TRICHLOROETHENE 2,543 2,543 0 33% 0 6.30E-002 0

V VANADIUM 1,556 1,354 202 42% 117 6.20E-001 73

Y YTTRIUM 621 584 37 58% 16 0.00E+000 0

ZN ZINC 141,259 76,854 64,405 77% 14,813 5.10E-002 755

Totals 424,150,513 309,061,707 115,088,807 18,995,720 25,774

Source: Development Document.
Appendix B 

Supporting Documentation for 

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: 

Cost Analysis
B-1

Table B-1

Computation of Annualized Costs for CP-IL in 1993 and 1981 Dollars

Costs CP_IL CP_IL CP_IL CP_IL

no cutoff 1MM/255K 3MM/120K 5MM/255K

 Capital Cost ($1993) $528,827,868 $507,469,980 $387,491,478 $234,139,808

 Annual O&M Cost ($1993) $123,057,702 $116,835,047 $89,155,808 $52,866,169

 Total Annualized Capital Cost ($1993) $55,980,474 $53,719,578 $41,018,936 $24,785,489

 Total Annual Cost ($1993) $179,038,176 $170,554,625 $130,174,744 $77,651,658

 Deflator 0.6785 0.6785 0.6785 0.6785

 Total Cost ($1981) $121,477,403 $115,721,313 $88,323,564 $52,686,650

Source: Capital and O&M Costs: Development Document; Deflator: Engineering News Record

Construction Cost Index, March 31, 1997.
B-2

Table B-2

Computation of Annualized Costs for DAF-IL in 1993 and 1981 Dollars

Costs DAF_IL DAF_IL DAF_IL DAF_IL

no cutoff 1MM/255K 3MM/120K 5MM/255K

 Capital Cost ($1993) $435,352,966 $417,313,882 $313,173,435 $180,570,477

 Annual O&M Cost ($1993) $148,560,743 $142,276,538 $111,909,982 $69,533,822

 Total Annualized Capital Cost ($1993) $46,085,441 $44,175,866 $33,151,803 $19,114,766

 Total Annual Cost ($1993) $194,646,184 $186,452,404 $145,061,785 $88,648,588

 Deflator 0.6785 0.6785 0.6785 0.6785

 Total Cost ($1981) $132,067,436 $126,507,956 $98,424,421 $60,148,067

Source: Capital and O&M Costs: Development Document; Deflator: Engineering News Record

Construction Cost Index, March 31, 1997.