alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CENTCOM Statement on Hamas Terrorist Attack on Israel

/ Published Oct. 7, 2023

Oct. 7, 2023

Release Number 20231007-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

USCENTCOM is closely tracking the situation surrounding the appalling terrorist attack by Hamas against the people of Israel. We stand with Israel and extend our condolences for the lives lost in these attacks. USCENTCOM remains in communication with our counterparts.
#### § 835.11 Obtaining Board accident reports, factual accident reports, and supporting information.

It is the responsibility of the individual requesting testimony to obtain desired documents. There are a number of ways to obtain Board accident reports, factual accident reports, and accompanying accident docket files. Our rules at parts 801 and 837 of this chapter explain our procedures, as will our web site, at *www.ntsb.gov.* Or, you may call our Public Inquiries Branch, at (800) 877-6799. Documents will not be supplied by witnesses at depositions, nor will copying services be provided by deponents.

[63 FR 71608, Dec. 29, 1998]
§ 92.7 Notice, hearing, written response and decision. ( a ) Except as provided in § 92.9 of this part, each employee from whom the department proposes to offset a debt against the Federal pay of an employee who is indebted to the United States under a program administrated by DOT under these regulations is entitled to receive a minimum of 30 days written notice as described in § 92.11 of this part (see also § 92.21(a)).
( b ) Each employee owing a debt to the United States which will be collected by salary offset is entitled to petition for a hearing before collection starts. This petition shall be filed directly with the accounting or finance office of the DOT creditor operating element which shall make appropriate hearing arrangements consistent with law and regulations. The DOT creditor operating element shall provide an explanation of the rights of the employee. If a hearing is provided, the following issues shall be heard: ( 1 ) The determination of the DOT creditor operating element concerning the existence and amount of the debt; and
( 2 ) The terms of the repayment schedule, if not previously established by written agreement between the employee and the DOT creditor operating element. (See § 92.21(c) regarding copy of written decision by hearing officer describing method and amount of salary offset).
Record of Discussion 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

With whom outside the FAA bas this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

Beechcraft Rob Ramey 5/112015 Other. List below. 

Other/ Additional Information: The development of Beechcraft SB 78-4133
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5, the Court has determined t hat

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________ No. 98-10489 Summary Calendar

____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus
JOSE ANGEL CASTORENA,
Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Southern District of Texas

(4:92-CR-155-Y)

_________________________________________________________________ September 21, 1998 Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
Federal prisoner #23875-077 Jose Angel Castorena appeals the

denial of his motion for reduction of sentence unde r 18 U.S.C. §

358 2(c)(2). We review such denials for abuse of discretion.

United States v. Gonzalez-Balderas , 1 05 F.3d 981, 982 (5th Cir.
1997).

Castorena maintains tha t the district court should have
reduced his sentence in the light of a 1994 amendment to U.S.S.G.§ 2D1.1(c) (“Amendment 505"), under which his base offens e level

would have been 38, rather than 40; and that the court should have

c onsidered explicitly the factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

Retroactive application of Amendment 505 left the district court

still bound to impose life imp risonment, however, given the

enhancements to Castorena’s offense level. S ee Gonzalez-Balderas , 105 F.3d at 982-84. Accordingly, the district court did not abuse

its discretion in summarily denying Castorena’s motion for

reduction of sentence without explicitly considering the § 3553(a)

factors. See id

.
AFFIRMED
Air Force, Navy officers help develop Afghan hospital project
 By Tech. Sgt. Jeremy Larlee , 438th Air Expeditionary Wing
  
 KABUL, Afghanistan (January 31, 2012) — A major step forward for Afghans living near Shindand Air Base, Afghanistan, occurred Jan. 28 during the groundbreaking for a new hospital. The $5 million commander’s emergency response program has an estimated completion timeframe of nine months. Air Force Maj. Wesley Morris, a comptroller adviser for the 838th Air Expeditionary Advisory Group, has been lending his funding expertise to the project. He said working towards planning the hospital has been rewarding and he was excited to be able to assist local Afghans. “This hospital provides a brand-new capability to the Shindand district and should revolutionize healthcare here,” said Morris. “The hospital will provide women’s care and pediatric care as well emergency services.” Navy Cmdr. Paul Fermo is the deputy commander of the 838th AEAG and the director of the civil affairs programs at Shindand. He said the project has built a high level of hope for the local populace.“The locals are extremely excited about this regional hospital,” he said. “Currently, the closest hospital is located in Herat, about an hour’s drive over occasionally unfriendly roads. Just getting there means a loss of time, money and safety.” Fermo said that civil affairs programs are a key part of the mission in Afghanistan.“These humanitarian missions are tremendously important to our mission here,” said Fermo. “Humanitarian missions target the essential needs to sustain life: basic health, food, water and security that build a solid foundation for a stable community.”Fermo went on to explain that efforts were also a great way to discredit anti-government and anti-coalition rhetoric used by the Taliban and other derivative insurgent groups. He said it’s also worthwhile to include the Afghan air force and other Afghan government organizations in the humanitarian process.“By putting Afghans out front,” he said “We not only promote community goodwill, but more importantly, we build confidence within the local population that the government of Afghanistan is able to administer to their basic needs.”Fermo said in the Shindand district there is an estimated 400 villages. He said giving Afghans the tools to depend on themselves will make it an easier process for the coalition partners to transfer control of Afghanistan back to them.Morris said he feels fortunate to be able to work on a project like the hospital.“The Air Base gets almost daily requests for emergency medical support and every time I’ve gone outside the wire people approach us requesting medical assistance, so there is obviously a serious need here,” he said. “Having the privilege of being involved in enduring humanitarian assistance projects like the hospital, which have the potential to change the future of Shindand, is very rewarding.”
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000038

08-JUN-2017

08:35 AM
# Coalition Statement on ISIS Convoy

/ Published Aug. 30, 2017
August 30, 2017Release 20170830-02FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**SOUTHWEST ASIA -** The Coalition was not a party to any agreement between the Lebanese Hezbollah, the Syrian regime and ISIS. Russian and pro-regime counter-ISIS words ring hollow when they cut deals with and allow terrorists to transit territory under their control.ISIS is a global threat; relocating terrorists from one place to another for someone else to deal with, is not a lasting solution. This is just further evidence of why Coalition military action is necessary to defeat ISIS in Syria.The Coalition has not struck the convoy. In accordance with the law of armed conflict, the Coalition cratered the road heading east between Hamaymah and Abul Kamal to prevent the further transport of ISIS fighters to the border area of our Iraqi partners and struck individual vehicles and fighters that were clearly identified as ISIS.In accordance with the law of armed conflict, the Coalition will take action against ISIS whenever and wherever we are able to without harming civilians.-30-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,980
<SECURITIES>                                    35,688
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,992
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,092  
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                94,568
<PP&E>                                           2,810
<DEPRECIATION>                                     489
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  96,889
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,390
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,890
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            87
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,522
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    96,889
<SALES>                                         13,350
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,350
<CGS>                                            2,156
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,156
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,381
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   663
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,109
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,041
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,016
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,025
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,025
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43
        

</TABLE>
Comment submitted by: Nick ONeill, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, United States

This a comment re: RIN 1210-AB33. 15 years ago when I took my family to 

an amusement park and stood in line with people who appeared to be of a 

lower income status than my family but non the less had every expensive 

souvenir and were wearing all the expensive logo and sports team 

attire, while my family did not so that I could put money into a 

retirement account for my future, I remarked to my wife that we were 

being fools because when the future arrived our government was not 

going to allow the spenders to suffer for having not saved. I predicted 

that I would be screwed for having lived responsively within my means. 

That day is now at hand. I'm 65, I have paid off my 10 year old car and 

my mortgage is low on my house. I almost have enough to retire even 

though I am paying 100% of two sons college education and lost a huge 

amount of my savings thank to the government mandated housing debacle. 

Now my government wants to confiscate my retirement so that it can 

redistribute funds the people who never struggled to save. Shame on my 

government. 

Our Founding ?Fathers would vomit. Please forward this to every 

beaurucrat and agnecy that thinks that confiscation/redistribution of 

savings is in the interests of freedom.
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

12 February 2004

in Case T-282/01: Aslantrans AG v Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Customs duties - Repayment of import duties - Shipment of cigarettes stolen during transport - Notion of special situation within the meaning of Article 905 of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 - Compliance with the time-limit)

(2004/C 94/116)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-282/01, Aslantrans AG, established in Rickenbach bei Wil (Switzerland), represented by J. Weigell, avocat, v Commission of the European Communities (Agents: initially by R. Tricot and S. Fries, and subsequently by X. Lewis and S. Fries): Application for annulment of Commission Decision REM 19/00 of 18 July 2001 refusing to grant an application by the Federal Republic of Germany for repayment of import duties in favour of the applicant, the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of: P. Lindh, President, and R. García-Valdecasas and J.D. Cooke, Judges I. Natsinas, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 12 February 2004, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 44 of 16.02.2003.

----
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL 

AND SCOT SPENCER 

AIRLIFT GROUP, INC. 

AND RICHARD BERNARD 

Unauthorized Air Transportation, Unfair and Deceptive 

Practices and Unfair Methods of Competition, and 

Violations of Public Charter Rules 

EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of 

Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rules 

Enforcement Proceeding 

STATUS REPORT 

DOT -OST -1995-272 

formerly 

Docket 49233 

The Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and 

Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22, 2006, Order 

staying this proceeding, files this report detailing the current status of this proceeding and 

settlement negotiations. 

The Department has not ruled on the outstanding motions filed by Respondents 

and opposed by the Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group, Docket OST -2004-

17486. 
2 

There have been no further settlement discussions. 

Date: October 26, 2012. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

~~~a:Jf4r~~ Senior Trial Attorney 

United States Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Room 96-429 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: 202-366-9342 

FAX: 202-366-7152 
3 

Docket No. DOT-OST-1995-272 

I hereby certify that on this 26th day of October, 2012, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Status Report was served in the following manner to the following: 

Original 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

By First Class Mail 

The Honorable Ronnie A Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: (202) 366-2142 

FAX: (202) 366-7536 

By First Class Mail 

Scot Spencer 

SBD Aircraft Services 

255 S Leland Norton Way 

Sam Bernardino, CA 92408
From: Dacmom49@aol.com [mailto:Dacmom49@aol.com] 

Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 11:13 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

 If the government can't manage Medicare Medicaid and throws Social Security away what 

makes you think we would approve of you tampering with our 401K's? And just who gets the 

proceeds if the recipient dies prior to collecting on all their hard earn dollars, family or the 

government? 

 You want to correct the Social Security system and Medicare/Medicaid we have two simple 

options 

 - Pull the golden retirement/medical for legislators and put them in the same system as 

their constituent’s percentage of contribution and return at retirement. As these are such great 

programs they should come along and belong. No more benefits for SSI or medical for any and 

all illegal immigrants. Most of us know that they can collect more than those of us that have 

contributed all our lives. 

 This would definitely put us in the red without raising fees and taxes.
# U.S. transfers Maysan training base, airstrip to Iraqi government

/ Published March 29, 2010

MAYSAN, Iraq  (March 29, 2010) – Leadership from the 10th Iraqi Army Division and the Iraqi Receivership Secretariat accepted the complete return of Contingency Operating Site Hunter in southern Maysan province from U.S. Forces, March 26.During a small ceremony, the Record of Return was signed and the Government of Iraq took control of the facility and adjacent airplane landing strip.  At the conclusion of the ceremony, all U.S. Soldiers departed the base.Over $1 million of property and equipment was transferred to the Iraqis.  Some of the items include tents, base security structures, dining facilities, and power generation equipment.U.S. Forces from 4th Brigade, 1st Armored Division utilized the base to advise and assist the Iraqi Security Forces near the city of Qalit Salih and the Hwayzah marshes.  The 10th Iraqi Army Division will use the base as a training facility.“Returning Contingency Operating Site Hunter to the Iraqi Army is another sign of normalcy,” said Maj. Vida Burrell, operations officer, 2nd Squadron, 13th Cavalry Regiment who lived on COS Hunter.  “They demonstrated their proficiency with elections security, and this base provides them weapons ranges, housing, and a secure helicopter landing zone to continue training.”
# Death of ISIS Leader  

/ Published Nov. 30, 2022

Nov. 30, 2022

Release Number 20221130-12

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Statement from Col. Joe Buccino, U.S. CENTCOM spokesman:

TAMPA, Fla. – The death of Abu al-Hassan al-Hashimi al-Qurayshi in mid-October is another blow to ISIS. This operation was conducted by The Free Syrian Army in Dar’a province in Syria. ISIS remains a threat to the region. CENTCOM and our partners remain focused on the enduring defeat of ISIS.

-30-
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

PUBLIC MEETING ON THE ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARD 

FRAMEWORK DOCUMENT FOR HIGH-INTENSITY DISCHARGE LAMPS 

U.S. Department of Energy 

1000 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20585 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 

Room 8E-089 

Purpose 

The Department of Energy (DOE) is holding this public meeting to discuss the energy 

conservation standard framework document for high-intensity discharge lamps. DOE will also 

explain its plans for the analyses for the rulemaking. Lastly, DOE will seek comment on the 

rulemaking, including planned methodologies, assumptions, analytical tools, and data sources 

DOE proposes to use. 

Agenda 

 9:00 - 9:05 am Welcome 

 9:05 - 9:20 am Introductions and Agenda Review 

 Lucy deButts, DOE Lighting Project Manager

 9:20 - 9:40 am Opening Remarks 

 9:40 – 10:15 am Regulatory History, Rulemaking Overview and Scope of 

Coverage Matthew Walker, Navigant Consulting, Inc.

 10:15 - 10:30 am Break 

 10:30 - 11:00 am Market and Technology Assessment and Screening Analysis Matthew Walker, Navigant

 11:00 - 11:45 am Engineering Analysis 

 Merry Walker, Navigant 

 11:45 am - 12:45 pm Break for Lunch 

 12:45 - 1:00 pm Energy Use Analysis 

 Michael Myer, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 

 1:00 - 1:15 pm Markup Analysis 

 Michael Myer, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

 1:15 - 1:45 pm Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analysis Scott Morris, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
 1:45 - 2:15 pm Shipments Analysis, National Impacts Analysis, and Life-Cycle 

Cost Subgroup Analysis Michael Myer and Scott Morris, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 

 2:15 - 2:30 pm Break 

 2:30 - 2:40 pm Manufacturer Impact Analysis 

 Merry Walker, Navigant

 2:40 - 3:10 pm Utility Impact Analysis, Employment Impact Analysis, 

Environmental Assessment, and Regulatory Impact Analysis Michael Myer, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

 3:10 - 3:30 pm Other Issues and Comments; Closing Remarks Lucy deButts, DOE Lighting Project Manager
1210-AB32-2-1635.html[7/26/2015 9:21:35 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jy0-2mzp

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2132

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: ML G

General Comment

I disagree with your proposed rule to restrict information available about my IRA investments from financial

 advisers, by redefining the term "fiduciary". I believe this would have a negative impact on my ability to make

 informed decisions about my IRAs, and negatively affect millions of other middle class Americans trying to

 make educated choices for their own IRAs.

It is NOT the governments job to decide whats best for my personal retirement accounts, and I do NOT support

 the Department of Labor's interference in private citizens' ability to make choices for controlling their own

 IRAs.
# Feb. 26 Red Sea Update

/ Published Feb. 26, 2024

Feb. 26, 2024Release Number 20240226 - 01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

TAMPA, Fla. – On Feb. 26, between the hours of 4:45 p.m. and 11:45 p.m. (Sanaa time), U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) forces destroyed three unmanned surface vessels (USV), two mobile anti-ship cruise missiles (ASCM), and a one-way attack unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in self-defense. The USV and ASCM weapons were prepared to launch towards, and the UAV was over, the Red Sea.

CENTCOM forces identified the USVs and missiles in Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen, as well as the UAV over the Red Sea, and determined that they presented an imminent threat to merchant vessels and to the U.S. Navy ships in the region. These actions are taken to protect freedom of navigation and make international waters safer and more secure for U.S. Navy and merchant vessels.
§ 7.13 How are copies of publicly available records obtained? ( a ) *Copies of materials covered by this subpart that are published and offered for sale.* Records that are ordinarily made available to the public as a part of an information program of the Government, such as news releases and pamphlets, may be obtained upon request by contacting the appropriate DOT location identified in § 7.12(b) or the sources identified in § 7.41(g), and paying the applicable duplication fee or purchase price. Whenever practicable, DOT also makes the publications available at the appropriate physical locations identified in § 7.12(b).
( b ) *Copies of materials covered by this subpart that are not published and offered for sale.* Such records may be ordered, upon payment of the appropriate fee (if any fee applies), through the applicable FOIA Requester Service Center or through the DOT Dockets Office identified in § 7.12(b): ( 1 ) Per copy of each page (not larger than 8.5 × 14 inches) reproduced by photocopy or similar means—US $0.10.
( 2 ) Per copy prepared by any other method of duplication—actual direct cost of production.
( 3 ) Copies are certified upon request by contacting the applicable FOIA Requester Service Center listed in § 7.27 and paying the fee prescribed in § 7.41(e).