UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
      OF 1934

                 For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002


[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
      OF  1934


                For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-11935


                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX
        (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)



         California                                              94-2887133
(State or other jurisdiction of                               (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                              Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)

<PAGE>



                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

                               September 30, 2002
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


Assets
<S>                                                                         <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                $ 2,160
   Receivables and deposits                                                   1,375
   Restricted escrows                                                            23
   Other assets                                                                 635
   Investment properties:
      Land                                                   $ 11,635
      Buildings and related personal property                  91,210
                                                              102,845
      Less accumulated depreciation                           (54,978)       47,867
                                                                           $ 52,060
Liabilities and Partners' Deficit
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                          $ 289
   Tenant security deposits payable                                             276
   Accrued property taxes                                                     1,045
   Due to former affiliate                                                      361
   Other liabilities                                                          1,476
   Mortgage notes payable                                                    58,679

Partners' Deficit:
   General partner                                           $ (9,825)
   Limited partners (89,292 units issued and
      outstanding)                                               (241)      (10,066)
                                                                           $ 52,060



            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>


                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                      (in thousands, except per unit data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                         Three Months               Nine Months
                                     Ended September 30,        Ended September 30,
                                      2002         2001          2002          2001
                                                (Restated)                  (Restated)
Revenues:
<S>                                 <C>           <C>           <C>          <C>
  Rental income                     $ 3,633       $ 3,999       $11,628      $12,320
  Other income                          360           290         1,029          947
  Gain on casualty                      443            --           443          156
       Total revenues                 4,436         4,289        13,100       13,423

Expenses:
  Operating                           1,421         1,626         4,300        4,491
  General and administrative            112           140           367          386
  Depreciation                          885           861         2,689        2,596
  Interest                            1,591         1,236         3,744        3,878
  Property tax                          348           336         1,042        1,040
       Total expenses                 4,357         4,199        12,142       12,391

Net income                            $ 79         $ 90          $ 958       $ 1,032

Net income allocated to
  general partner                     $ 9          $ 11          $ 113        $ 122
Net income allocated to
  limited partners                       70            79           845          910

                                      $ 79         $ 90          $ 958       $ 1,032

Net income per limited
  partnership unit                   $ 0.78       $ 0.88        $ 9.46       $ 10.19

Distributions per limited
  partnership unit                    $ --        $ 17.59       $ 18.38      $ 39.37

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

               CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' (DEFICIT) CAPITAL
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                     Limited
                                    Partnership    General       Limited
                                       Units       Partner      Partners       Total

<S>                                   <C>            <C>         <C>         <C>
Original capital contributions        89,292         $ --        $89,292     $ 89,292

Partners' (deficit) capital
   at December 31, 2001               89,292       $(9,718)       $ 555      $ (9,163)

Distributions paid to partners            --          (220)       (1,641)      (1,861)

Net income for the nine months
   ended September 30, 2002               --           113           845          958

Partners' deficit at
   September 30, 2002                 89,292       $(9,825)      $ (241)     $(10,066)

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>
                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                 (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                 Nine Months Ended
                                                                   September 30,
                                                                  2002         2001
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                              <C>         <C>
  Net income                                                     $ 958       $ 1,032
  Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
   by operating activities:
     Depreciation                                                 2,689        2,596
     Amortization of loan costs and discount                         65           73
     Casualty gain                                                 (443)        (156)
     Loss on early extinguishment of debt                            --           39
     Contingent interest on mortgage note encumbering
      McMillan Place                                                420          250
     Change in accounts:
      Receivables and deposits                                     (361)        (195)
      Other assets                                                 (156)         (82)
      Accounts payable                                               19           55
      Tenant security deposits payable                              (24)         (12)
      Accrued property taxes                                        417          511
      Due to former affiliate                                        91           --
      Other liabilities                                             (51)        (207)
         Net cash provided by operating activities                3,624        3,904

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                         (1,426)      (1,523)
  Net insurance proceeds received                                   754          223
  Net withdrawals from (deposits to) restricted escrows             146          (26)
         Net cash used in investing activities                     (526)      (1,326)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Proceeds from long term borrowing                                  --        4,650
  Repayment of mortgage note payable                                 --       (3,250)
  Loan costs paid                                                    --         (185)
  Payments on mortgage notes payable                               (722)        (775)
  Distributions to partners                                      (1,861)      (3,864)
         Net cash used in financing activities                   (2,583)      (3,424)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents                515         (846)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                  1,645        2,172
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                      $ 2,160      $ 1,326

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                        $ 3,198      $ 3,517

At December  31, 2001 and  September  30,  2002,  accounts  payable and property
improvements and replacements  were adjusted by approximately  $325,000 for each
period.

            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)


Note A - Basis of Presentation

The  accompanying   unaudited   consolidated  financial  statements  of  Century
Properties Fund XIX (the  "Partnership" or  "Registrant")  have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted  accounting  principles for interim financial
information  and  with the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB  and  Item  310(b)  of
Regulation  S-B.  Accordingly,  they do not include all of the  information  and
footnotes  required by generally  accepted  accounting  principles  for complete
financial statements. The general partner of the Partnership is Fox Partners II,
a California  general  partnership.  The general partners of Fox Partners II are
Fox Capital Management Corporation ("FCMC" or the "Managing General Partner"), a
California  corporation,  Fox Realty  Investors  ("FRI"),  a California  general
partnership, and Fox Partners 83, a California general partnership. The Managing
General Partner is a subsidiary of Apartment  Investment and Management  Company
("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust. In the opinion of the
Managing  General  Partner,  all  adjustments  (consisting  of normal  recurring
accruals)  considered  necessary  for a fair  presentation  have been  included.
Operating  results for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002
are not  necessarily  indicative  of the results  that may be  expected  for the
fiscal year ending  December 31,  2002.  For further  information,  refer to the
consolidated   financial  statements  and  footnotes  thereto  included  in  the
Partnership's  Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December
31, 2001.

Effective  April  1,  2002,  the  Partnership  adopted  Statement  of  Financial
Accounting  Standards ("SFAS") No. 145,  "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4,44
and 64". SFAS No. 4 "Reporting  Gains and Losses from  Extinguishment  of Debt,"
required  that all gains and losses from  extinguishment  of debt be  aggregated
and, if material,  classified as an  extraordinary  item.  SFAS No. 145 rescinds
SFAS No. 4, and accordingly, gains and losses from extinguishment of debt should
only be  classified  as  extraordinary  if they are  unusual in nature and occur
infrequently. Neither of these criteria applies to the Partnership. As a result,
the accompanying statements of operations have been restated to reflect the loss
on early  extinguishment  of debt at  Sunrunner  Apartments  (see  "Note  C") in
operations as interest expense rather than as an extraordinary item.

Note B - Casualty

In February 2000, one of the Partnership's investment properties, McMillan Place
Apartments,  incurred damages to its buildings as a result of a hail storm. As a
result of the damage,  approximately  $142,000 of fixed assets and approximately
$75,000 of  accumulated  depreciation  were written off resulting in a net write
off of approximately  $67,000. The property received  approximately  $223,000 in
proceeds from the insurance company to repair the damaged units during 2001. For
financial  statement  purposes,  a casualty gain of  approximately  $156,000 was
recognized  during  2001 as a result  of the  difference  between  the  proceeds
received and the net book value of the buildings which were damaged.

In May  2001,  one of the  Partnership's  investment  properties,  Vinings  Peak
Apartments,  incurred damages to ten units as a result of a fire. As a result of
the damage, approximately $528,000 of fixed assets and approximately $316,000 of
accumulated  depreciation  were  written  off  resulting  in a net  write off of
approximately $212,000. The property received approximately $461,000 in proceeds
from the  insurance  company  to repair  the  damaged  units  during  2002.  For
financial  statement  purposes,  a casualty gain of  approximately  $249,000 was
recognized  during  2002 as a result  of the  difference  between  the  proceeds
received and the net book value of the buildings which were damaged.

In  May  2002,  one  of  the  Partnership's  investment  properties,  Sandspoint
Apartments,  incurred  damages to twenty-four  units as a result of a fire. As a
result of the damage,  approximately  $228,000 of fixed assets and approximately
$129,000 of accumulated  depreciation  were written off resulting in a net write
off of approximately  $99,000. The property received  approximately  $293,000 in
proceeds from the insurance company to repair the damaged units during 2002. For
financial  statement  purposes,  a casualty gain of  approximately  $194,000 was
recognized  during  2002 as a result  of the  difference  between  the  proceeds
received and the net book value of the buildings which were damaged.

Note C - Refinancing of Mortgage Note Payable

On August 31, 2001 the  Partnership  refinanced  the  mortgage  note payable for
Sunrunner Apartments.  The refinancing of Sunrunner Apartments replaced mortgage
indebtedness of approximately $3,250,000 with a new mortgage of $4,650,000.  The
mortgage was  refinanced at a rate of 7.06% compared to the prior rate of 7.33%.
Payments of  approximately  $36,000 are due on the first day of each month until
the note matures in September 2021. At the closing,  a repair escrow of $125,000
was  established and is held by the lender.  Capitalized  loan costs incurred on
the  refinancing  were  approximately   $185,000.   The  Partnership  wrote  off
unamortized  loan costs resulting in a loss on early  extinguishment  of debt of
approximately $39,000.

Note D - Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The Registrant has no employees and is dependent on the Managing General Partner
and its  affiliates for the management  and  administration  of all  Partnership
activities.  The  Partnership  Agreement  provides  for (i) certain  payments to
affiliates for services and (ii)  reimbursement of certain expenses  incurred by
affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.

During the nine months  ended  September  30, 2002 and 2001,  affiliates  of the
Managing  General Partner were entitled to receive 5% of gross receipts from all
of the Registrant's properties as compensation for providing property management
services.  The Registrant  paid to such  affiliates  approximately  $651,000 and
$684,000 for the nine months ended  September  30, 2002 and 2001,  respectively,
which is included in operating expenses.

An  affiliate  of  the  Managing  General  Partner  received   reimbursement  of
accountable  administrative  expenses  amounting to  approximately  $131,000 and
$125,000 for the nine months ended  September  30, 2002 and 2001,  respectively,
which is included in general and administrative expenses.

Pursuant  to  the  Partnership  Agreement,  for  managing  the  affairs  of  the
Partnership, the general partner is entitled to receive a Partnership management
fee  equal  to  10%  of the  Partnership's  adjusted  cash  from  operations  as
distributed.  Approximately $186,000 and $277,000 in Partnership management fees
were paid along with the  distributions  from operations  during the nine months
ended  September  30, 2002 and 2001,  respectively,  and are included in general
partner distributions.

The Partnership paid an affiliate of the Managing General Partner  approximately
$47,000 for loan costs  associated with the refinancing of Sunrunner  Apartments
(see  "Note  C") which  are  capitalized  and  included  in other  assets on the
consolidated balance sheet.

An  affiliate  of  the  Managing  General  Partner  has  made  available  to the
Partnership  a  credit  line  of  up to  $150,000  per  property  owned  by  the
Partnership.  The Partnership has no outstanding  amounts due under this line of
credit.  Other  than  cash  and cash  equivalents,  the  line of  credit  is the
Partnership's only unused source of liquidity.

Beginning in 2001, the  Partnership  began insuring its properties up to certain
limits through coverage provided by AIMCO which is generally  self-insured for a
portion of losses and  liabilities  related  to workers  compensation,  property
casualty and vehicle liability. The Partnership insures its properties above the
AIMCO  limits  through  insurance  policies  obtained  by  AIMCO  from  insurers
unaffiliated  with the Managing  General  Partner.  During the nine months ended
September  30,  2002 and 2001,  the  Partnership  was  charged  by AIMCO and its
affiliates  approximately  $187,000 and  $203,000,  respectively,  for insurance
coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration.

Note E - Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purports  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class  of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  which are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. ("Insignia") and entities which were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged  into AIMCO.  The  plaintiffs  seek  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
On June 25, 1998, the Managing General Partner filed a motion seeking  dismissal
of the action.  In lieu of responding  to the motion,  the  plaintiffs  filed an
amended  complaint.  The Managing General Partner filed demurrers to the amended
complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December 14, 1999, the Managing  General  Partner and its affiliates  terminated
the  proposed  settlement.  In  February  2000,  counsel  for some of the  named
plaintiffs filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who
negotiated  the  settlement.  On June  27,  2000,  the  Court  entered  an order
disqualifying  them  from the case and an  appeal  was  taken  from the order on
October 5, 2000. On December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff
Cabraser  Heimann & Bernstein  LLP as new lead  counsel for  plaintiffs  and the
putative class.  Plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint on January 19, 2001.
On March 2, 2001,  the  Managing  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On July 10, 2001, the Court issued an
order  sustaining  defendants'  demurrer on certain  grounds.  On July 20, 2001,
Plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court's July 10, 2001 order
granting in part and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001,
Plaintiffs  filed a fourth amended class and  derivative  action  complaint.  On
September 12, 2001, the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration.  On
October 5, 2001, the Managing General Partner and affiliated  defendants filed a
demurrer to the fourth amended complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001.
On February 2, 2002,  the Court served its order  granting in part the demurrer.
The  Court has  dismissed  without  leave to amend  certain  of the  plaintiffs'
claims.  On February 11, 2002,  plaintiffs  filed a motion  seeking to certify a
putative  class  comprised of all  non-affiliated  persons who own or have owned
units  in  the  partnerships.   The  Managing  General  Partner  and  affiliated
defendants  oppose the motion.  On April 29,  2002,  the Court held a hearing on
plaintiffs' motion for class  certification and took the matter under submission
after further  briefing,  as ordered by the court, was submitted by the parties.
On July 10, 2002,  the Court entered an order vacating the current trial date of
January 13, 2003 (as well as the  pre-trial  and  discovery  cut-off  dates) and
stayed the case in its entirety through November 7, 2002 so that the parties can
have an  opportunity  to discuss  settlement.  On October  30,  2002,  the court
entered an order extending the stay in effect through January 10, 2003.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first amended  complaint.  The first amended complaint in the Heller action is
brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserts  claims for among other
things  breach  of  fiduciary  duty;  unfair  competition;   conversion,  unjust
enrichment;  and judicial  dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a
motion to  consolidate  the Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that
the Heller action was filed in order to preserve the derivative claims that were
dismissed  without  leave to amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated
July 10, 2001. On October 5, 2001, the Managing  General  Partner and affiliated
defendants  moved to strike the first  amended  complaint  in its  entirety  for
violating  the Court's July 10, 2001 order  granting in part and denying in part
defendants'  demurrer in the Nuanes action, or alternatively,  to strike certain
portions of the complaint based on the statute of limitations.  Other defendants
in the action  demurred to the fourth  amended  complaint,  and,  alternatively,
moved to strike the complaint. On December 11, 2001, the court heard argument on
the motions  and took the matters  under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the
Court  served  notice of its order  granting  defendants'  motion to strike  the
Heller complaint as a violation of its July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes action.
On March 27, 2002,  the plaintiffs  filed a notice  appealing the order striking
the complaint. The parties are currently in the midst of briefing that appeal.

The Managing  General Partner does not anticipate that any costs,  whether legal
or  settlement  costs,  associated  with  these  cases will be  material  to the
Partnership's overall operations.

The  Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding  litigation that
is not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.



<PAGE>




ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The Private  Securities  Litigation  Reform Act of 1995 provides a "safe harbor"
for forward-looking  statements in certain circumstances.  The matters discussed
in this report contain certain forward-looking  statements,  including,  without
limitation,  statements regarding future financial performance and the effect of
government regulations. The discussions of the Registrant's business and results
of operations,  including forward-looking statements pertaining to such matters,
do not take into account the effects of any changes to the Registrant's business
and  results of  operations.  Actual  results may differ  materially  from those
described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a variety of
risks and factors  including,  without  limitation:  national and local economic
conditions; the terms of governmental regulations that affect the Registrant and
interpretations of those regulations;  the competitive  environment in which the
Registrant  operates;  financing risks,  including the risk that cash flows from
operations  may be  insufficient  to meet  required  payments of  principal  and
interest;  real estate risks, including variations of real estate values and the
general  economic  climate in local markets and  competition for tenants in such
markets; and possible environmental liabilities. Readers should carefully review
the Registrant's financial statements and the notes thereto, as well as the risk
factors  described in the documents the Registrant  files from time to time with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Partnership's  investment  properties consist of eight apartment  complexes.
The following  table sets forth the average  occupancy of the properties for the
nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001:

                                                   Average Occupancy
      Property                                      2002       2001

      Sunrunner Apartments                          94%        96%
         St. Petersburg, Florida
      Misty Woods Apartments                        89%        91%
         Charlotte, North Carolina
      McMillan Place Apartments (1)                 94%        97%
         Dallas, Texas
      Vinings Peak Apartments (1)                   88%        92%
         Atlanta, Georgia
      Wood Lake Apartments (1)                      87%        91%
         Atlanta, Georgia
      Plantation Crossing                           87%        88%
         Atlanta, Georgia
      Greenspoint Apartments                        92%        93%
         Phoenix, Arizona
      Sandspoint Apartments (2)                     88%        95%
         Phoenix, Arizona

(1)   The  Managing  General  Partner  attributes  the  decrease in occupancy at
      McMillan  Place,  Vinings Peak and Wood Lake  Apartments  to a competitive
      market  with  competing   properties  offering  large  concessions  and  a
      favorable home buying market with low interest rates.

(2)   The  Managing  General  Partner  attributes  the  decrease in occupancy at
      Sandspoint  Apartments to a fire that damaged  twenty-four  units in April
      2002.

Results of Operations

The  Partnership's  net income for the nine months ended  September 30, 2002 and
2001 was approximately  $958,000 and $1,032,000,  respectively.  The Partnership
recognized  a net  income  for the three  months  ended  September  30,  2002 of
approximately  $79,000 compared to net income for the comparable  period in 2001
of  approximately  $90,000.  The decrease in the net income for the three months
ended  September 30, 2002 is due to an increase in total  expenses,  offset by a
slight  increase  in total  revenues.  The  decrease  in net income for the nine
months ended September 30, 2002 is due to a decrease in total revenues offset by
a decrease in total expenses.

Total revenues  decreased for the nine months ended  September 30, 2002 due to a
decrease in rental  income offset by a larger  casualty gain  recognized in 2002
than in 2001. Total revenues  decreased for the three months ended September 30,
2002 due to a decrease in rental income offset by the  recognition of a casualty
gain.  Rental income decreased for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2002 due to a decrease in occupancy at all of the investment  properties  offset
by a  decrease  in  concessions  at  all of the  investment  properties,  except
Sandspoint Apartments.

In February 2000, one of the Partnership's investment properties, McMillan Place
Apartments,  incurred damages to its buildings as a result of a hail storm. As a
result of the damage,  approximately  $142,000 of fixed assets and approximately
$75,000 of  accumulated  depreciation  were written off resulting in a net write
off of approximately  $67,000. The property received  approximately  $223,000 in
proceeds from the insurance company to repair the damaged units during 2001. For
financial  statement  purposes,  a casualty gain of  approximately  $156,000 was
recognized  during  2001 as a result  of the  difference  between  the  proceeds
received and the net book value of the buildings which were damaged.

In May  2001,  one of the  Partnership's  investment  properties,  Vinings  Peak
Apartments,  incurred damages to ten units as a result of a fire. As a result of
the damage, approximately $528,000 of fixed assets and approximately $316,000 of
accumulated  depreciation  were  written  off  resulting  in a net  write off of
approximately $212,000. The property received approximately $461,000 in proceeds
from the  insurance  company  to repair  the  damaged  units  during  2002.  For
financial  statement  purposes,  a casualty gain of  approximately  $249,000 was
recognized  during  2002 as a result  of the  difference  between  the  proceeds
received and the net book value of the buildings which were damaged.

In  May  2002,  one  of  the  Partnership's  investment  properties,  Sandspoint
Apartments,  incurred  damages to twenty-four  units as a result of a fire. As a
result of the damage,  approximately  $228,000 of fixed assets and approximately
$129,000 of accumulated  depreciation  were written off resulting in a net write
off of approximately  $99,000. The property received  approximately  $293,000 in
proceeds from the insurance company to repair the damaged units during 2002. For
financial  statement  purposes,  a casualty gain of  approximately  $194,000 was
recognized  during  2002 as a result  of the  difference  between  the  proceeds
received and the net book value of the buildings which were damaged.

Total expenses  decreased for the nine months ended  September 30, 2002 due to a
decrease in  operating  and  interest  expense.  Operating  expense for the nine
months ended  September 30, 2002 decreased due to decreases in  advertising  and
property expenses at several of the investment  properties.  Advertising expense
decreased  due to  decreases in  periodicals  and special  promotions.  Property
expense decreased due to decreases in personnel salaries,  especially at Vinings
Peak Apartments.  Interest  expense  decreased due to a decrease in the interest
rate on the mortgage  encumbering  McMillian  Place.  On January 29,  1998,  the
Managing General Partner successfully  negotiated a modification of the terms of
the mortgage  encumbering  McMillian Place. The interest rate changed from 9.15%
to a  variable  rate of 325 basis  points  plus the  annualized  yield on United
States Treasury  non-callable bonds (5.27% at November 1, 2001 which is one year
from maturity).

Total expenses increased for the three months ended September 30, 2002 due to an
increase  in  interest  expense  offset  by a  decrease  in  operating  expense.
Operating expense for the three months ended September 30, 2002 decreased due to
decreases in property  expense.  Property expense  decreased due to decreases in
personnel  salaries.  Interest  expense  increased  due to  additional  interest
required to be paid at maturity of the mortgage  encumbering McMillan Place. The
additional  interest  is equal to 50% of the  increase in the  appreciated  fair
market value of McMillan Place.

Included in general and  administrative  expense at both  September 30, 2002 and
2001 are  reimbursements  to the  Managing  General  Partner  allowed  under the
Partnership  Agreement.  In addition,  costs  associated  with the quarterly and
annual  communications with investors and regulatory agencies are also included.
As part of the ongoing  business plan of the  Partnership,  the Managing General
Partner monitors the rental market  environment of its investment  properties to
assess the feasibility of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing occupancy
levels and protecting  the  Partnership  from increases in expenses.  As part of
this plan, the Managing General Partner attempts to protect the Partnership from
the burden of  inflation-related  increases in expenses by increasing  rents and
maintaining a high overall  occupancy  level.  However,  due to changing  market
conditions,  which  can  result  in the use of  rental  concessions  and  rental
reductions to offset softening market conditions, there is no guarantee that the
Managing General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At  September  30,  2002,  the  Registrant  had  cash and  cash  equivalents  of
approximately  $2,160,000 as compared to  approximately  $1,326,000 at September
30,  2001.  For the  nine  months  ended  September  30,  2002,  cash  and  cash
equivalents increased approximately $515,000 from the Registrant's calendar year
end due to  approximately  $2,583,000  and  $526,000  of cash used in  financing
activities  and  investing  activities,  respectively,  offset by  approximately
$3,624,000 of cash provided by operating activities.  Net cash used in financing
activities  consisted  of  distributions  to partners  and, to a lesser  extent,
payments  of  principal  made  on the  mortgages  encumbering  the  Registrant's
investment  properties.  Net cash  used in  investing  activities  consisted  of
capital  improvements  and replacements  partially offset by insurance  proceeds
received and net withdrawals from restricted  escrows maintained by the mortgage
lenders.  The  Partnership  invests  its  working  capital  reserves in interest
bearing accounts.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures  required at the  properties  to  adequately  maintain the physical
assets and other  operating  needs of the Registrant and to comply with Federal,
state, and local legal and regulatory requirements. The Managing General Partner
monitors  developments  in the area of legal and  regulatory  compliance  and is
studying  new  federal  laws,  including  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002.  The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 mandates or suggests  additional  compliance measures
with regard to governance,  disclosure, audit and other areas. In light of these
changes,  the Partnership  expects that it will incur higher expenses related to
compliance,  including  increased  legal and audit  fees.  Capital  improvements
planned for each of the Registrant's properties are detailed below.

Sunrunner Apartments

During the nine months ended  September  30,  2002,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $47,000 of capital  improvements  consisting  primarily  of floor
covering and HVAC replacements and structural  improvements.  These improvements
were funded from replacement  reserves.  Approximately $76,000 has been budgeted
for 2002 capital  improvements at Sunrunner  Apartments  consisting primarily of
floor covering,  appliance, air conditioning unit and water heater replacements.
Additional  improvements  may be  considered  and will  depend  on the  physical
condition  of the  property as well as  anticipated  cash flow  generated by the
property.

Misty Woods Apartments

During the nine months ended  September  30,  2002,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately $91,000 of capital improvements  consisting primarily of perimeter
fencing,  floor covering and appliance replacement,  wall coverings,  and office
computers.   These  improvements  were  funded  from  operating  cash  flow  and
replacement  reserves.  Approximately $93,000 has been budgeted for 2002 capital
improvements at Misty Woods  Apartments  consisting  primarily of floor covering
and appliance  replacements.  Additional improvements may be considered and will
depend on the physical condition of the property as well as replacement reserves
and anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

McMillan Place Apartments

During the nine months ended  September  30,  2002,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $84,000 of capital  improvements  consisting  primarily  of floor
covering replacements, interior decoration, office computers, and water heaters.
These improvements were funded from operating cash flow.  Approximately $140,000
has been budgeted for 2002 capital  improvements at McMillian  Place  Apartments
consisting primarily of floor covering  replacements,  interior decoration,  and
exterior painting.  Additional improvements may be considered and will depend on
the  physical  condition  of the  property  as well  as  anticipated  cash  flow
generated by the property.

Vinings Peak Apartments

During the nine months ended  September  30,  2002,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately   $125,000  of  budgeted  and  unbudgeted   capital   improvements
consisting  primarily  of  structural  improvements,  plumbing  fixtures,  floor
covering  replacements,   office  computers,  air  conditioning  upgrades,  wall
coverings and construction  related to a 2001 casualty.  These improvements were
funded from operating cash flow and insurance proceeds.  Approximately  $102,000
has been  budgeted for 2002  capital  improvements  at Vinings  Peak  Apartments
consisting primarily of floor covering replacements. Additional improvements may
be considered and will depend on the physical  condition of the property as well
as anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Plantation Crossing Apartments

During the nine months ended  September  30,  2002,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately $83,000 of budgeted and unbudgeted capital improvements consisting
primarily of office  computers,  swimming pool upgrades,  and floor covering and
appliance replacements. These improvements were funded from operating cash flow.
Approximately  $81,000  has been  budgeted  for  2002  capital  improvements  at
Plantation  Crossing  consisting  primarily  of  swimming  pool  upgrades,  wall
coverings,   resurfacing,   and  floor  covering  and  appliance   replacements.
Additional  improvements  may be  considered  and will  depend  on the  physical
condition  of the  property as well as  anticipated  cash flow  generated by the
property.

Wood Lake Apartments

During the nine months ended  September  30,  2002,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $55,000  of  capital  improvements  consisting  primarily  of air
conditioning and water heater  replacements,  wall coverings,  and appliance and
floor covering replacements.  These improvements were funded from operating cash
flow.  Approximately  $77,000 has been budgeted for 2002 capital improvements at
Wood  Lake  Apartments  consisting  primarily  of floor  covering  replacements.
Additional  improvements  may be  considered  and will  depend  on the  physical
condition  of the  property as well as  anticipated  cash flow  generated by the
property.

Greenspoint Apartments

During the nine months ended  September  30,  2002,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately   $148,000  of  capital   improvements   consisting  primarily  of
structural and plumbing improvements, floor covering and appliance replacements,
and major landscaping.  These improvements were funded from operating cash flow.
Approximately  $161,000  has been  budgeted  for 2002  capital  improvements  at
Greenspoint   Apartments  consisting  primarily  of  floor  covering,   exterior
painting,  major landscaping,  air conditioning unit replacements,  and plumbing
improvements.  Additional  improvements may be considered and will depend on the
physical condition of the property as well as anticipated cash flow generated by
the property.

Sands Point Apartments

During the nine months ended  September  30,  2002,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately $468,000 of capital improvements  (including nonbudgeted additions
due  to  a  casualty)  consisting  primarily  of  plumbing   improvements,   air
conditioning  unit  replacements,   structural  upgrades,   floor  covering  and
appliance  replacements,  and  construction  related to a 2002  casualty.  These
improvements  were  funded  from  operating  cash flow and  insurance  proceeds.
Approximately  $163,000 has been budgeted for 2002 capital improvements at Sands
Point  Apartments  consisting  primarily  of floor  covering  replacements,  air
conditioning  unit  replacements,   signage,   plumbing  fixtures,   drapes  and
miniblinds.  Additional  improvements  may be considered  and will depend on the
physical condition of the property as well as anticipated cash flow generated by
the property.

The additional  capital  expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available
from operations or from Partnership  reserves.  To the extent that such budgeted
capital improvements are completed, the Registrant's distributable cash flow, if
any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.

On August 31, 2001 the  Partnership  refinanced  the  mortgage  note payable for
Sunrunner Apartments.  The refinancing of Sunrunner Apartments replaced mortgage
indebtedness of approximately $3,250,000 with a new mortgage of $4,650,000.  The
mortgage was  refinanced at a rate of 7.06% compared to the prior rate of 7.33%.
Payments of  approximately  $36,000 are due on the first day of each month until
the note matures in September 2021. At the closing,  a repair escrow of $125,000
was  established and is held by the lender.  Capitalized  loan costs incurred on
the  refinancing  were  approximately   $185,000.   The  Partnership  wrote  off
unamortized  loan costs resulting in a loss on early  extinguishment  of debt of
approximately $39,000.

The Partnership's  current assets are thought to be sufficient for any near-term
needs  (exclusive  of capital  improvements)  of the  Partnership.  The mortgage
indebtedness of approximately  $58,679,000,  net of discount,  is amortized over
varying periods with required  balloon  payments  ranging from October 2002, for
McMillian Place, to September 2021. The Managing General Partner will attempt to
refinance such  indebtedness  and/or sell the properties  prior to such maturity
dates. If the properties  cannot be refinanced or sold for a sufficient  amount,
the Registrant will risk losing such properties through foreclosure.

Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement,  the term of the Partnership is scheduled
to expire on December 31, 2007. Accordingly,  prior to such date the Partnership
will need to either  sell its  investment  properties  or extend the term of the
Partnership.

The Partnership  distributed the following  amounts during the nine months ended
September 30, 2002 and 2001 (in thousands except per unit data):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                       Nine Months       Per Limited      Nine Months     Per Limited
                          Ended          Partnership         Ended        Partnership
                    September 30, 2002      Unit      September 30, 2001      Unit

<S>                       <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>
Operations                $1,861           $18.38           $2,769           $27.35
Refinancing (1)               --               --            1,095            12.02
                          $1,861           $18.38           $3,864           $39.37

(1) From August 2001 refinancing of Sunrunner Apartments.
</TABLE>

Future cash  distributions  will depend on the levels of net cash generated from
operations, the availability of cash reserves and the timing of debt maturities,
refinancings,  and/or  property  sales.  The  Partnership's  cash  available for
distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. There can be no assurance, however,
that the  Partnership  will  generate  sufficient  funds from  operations  after
required  capital  expenditures to permit further  distributions to its partners
during the remainder of 2002 or subsequent periods.

In addition to its  indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interest in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates owned 52,080.66 limited partnership units
in the Partnership representing 58.33% of the outstanding units at September 30,
2002. A number of these units were  acquired  pursuant to tender  offers made by
AIMCO or its  affiliates.  It is  possible  that  AIMCO or its  affiliates  will
acquire additional units of limited  partnership  interest in the Partnership in
exchange  for  cash  or a  combination  of  cash  and  units  in  the  operating
partnership of AIMCO either through  private  purchases or tender offers.  Under
the  Partnership  Agreement,  unitholders  holding a  majority  of the Units are
entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters which would include
voting on certain  amendments to the Partnership  Agreement and voting to remove
the  Managing  General  Partner.  As a result of its  ownership of 58.33% of the
outstanding units, AIMCO is in a position to influence all such voting decisions
with  respect to the  Registrant.  Although the  Managing  General  Partner owes
fiduciary  duties to the  limited  partners  of the  Partnership,  the  Managing
General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.  As
a result,  the duties of the  Managing  General  Partner,  as  managing  general
partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with
the duties of the Managing  General Partner to AIMCO,  as its sole  stockholder.
However, IPLP, an affiliate of the Managing General Partner, is required to vote
25,228.66 of its Units:  (i) against any proposal to increase the fees and other
compensation  payable by the Partnership to the Managing General Partner and any
of  its  affiliates;  and  (ii)  on all  other  matters  submitted  by it or its
affiliates,  in  proportion  to the votes cast by non  tendering  unit  holders.
Except for the foregoing,  no other limitations are imposed on IPLP's or AIMCO's
right to vote its Units.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States which require the Partnership
to  make  estimates  and  assumptions.  The  Partnership  believes  that  of its
significant  accounting  policies,  the following may involve a higher degree of
judgment and complexity.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Investment  properties  are  recorded at cost,  less  accumulated  depreciation,
unless  considered  impaired.  If  events  or  circumstances  indicate  that the
carrying  amount of a property may be  impaired,  the  Partnership  will make an
assessment of its  recoverability  by estimating  the  undiscounted  future cash
flows,  excluding  interest  charges,  of the property.  If the carrying  amount
exceeds the aggregate  future cash flows,  the  Partnership  would  recognize an
impairment  loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the
property.

Real  property  investments  are  subject  to varying  degrees of risk.  Several
factors  may  adversely  affect  the  economic  performance  and  value  of  the
Partnership's  investment  properties.  These  factors  include  changes  in the
national,  regional and local economic  climate;  local  conditions,  such as an
oversupply  of  multifamily   properties;   competition   from  other  available
multifamily  property  owners and changes in market  rental  rates.  Any adverse
changes in these factors could cause an impairment in the Partnership's assets.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.
Rental income  attributable to leases is recognized monthly as it is earned. The
Partnership will offer rental concessions during  particularly slow months or in
response  to  heavy  competition  from  other  similar  complexes  in the  area.
Concessions are charged to income as incurred.

ITEM 3.     CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The principal  executive officer and principal financial officer of the Managing
General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership's principal executive
officer and principal financial officer,  respectively,  have, within 90 days of
the filing date of this  quarterly report, evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the
Partnership's  disclosure  controls and  procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules  (13a-14(c)  and  (15d-14(c))  and have  determined  that such  disclosure
controls and procedures are adequate.  There have been no significant changes in
the Partnership's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly
affect the  Partnership's  internal  controls since the date of evaluation.  The
Partnership does not believe any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses
exist in the Partnership's internal controls. Accordingly, no corrective actions
have been taken.



<PAGE>


                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purports  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class  of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  which are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. ("Insignia") and entities which were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged  into AIMCO.  The  plaintiffs  seek  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
On June 25, 1998, the Managing General Partner filed a motion seeking  dismissal
of the action.  In lieu of responding  to the motion,  the  plaintiffs  filed an
amended  complaint.  The Managing General Partner filed demurrers to the amended
complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December 14, 1999, the Managing  General  Partner and its affiliates  terminated
the  proposed  settlement.  In  February  2000,  counsel  for some of the  named
plaintiffs filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who
negotiated  the  settlement.  On June  27,  2000,  the  Court  entered  an order
disqualifying  them  from the case and an  appeal  was  taken  from the order on
October 5, 2000. On December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff
Cabraser  Heimann & Bernstein  LLP as new lead  counsel for  plaintiffs  and the
putative class.  Plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint on January 19, 2001.
On March 2, 2001,  the  Managing  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On July 10, 2001, the Court issued an
order  sustaining  defendants'  demurrer on certain  grounds.  On July 20, 2001,
Plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court's July 10, 2001 order
granting in part and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001,
Plaintiffs  filed a fourth amended class and  derivative  action  complaint.  On
September 12, 2001, the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration.  On
October 5, 2001, the Managing General Partner and affiliated  defendants filed a
demurrer to the fourth amended complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001.
On February 2, 2002,  the Court served its order  granting in part the demurrer.
The  Court has  dismissed  without  leave to amend  certain  of the  plaintiffs'
claims.  On February 11, 2002,  plaintiffs  filed a motion  seeking to certify a
putative  class  comprised of all  non-affiliated  persons who own or have owned
units  in  the  partnerships.   The  Managing  General  Partner  and  affiliated
defendants  oppose the motion.  On April 29,  2002,  the Court held a hearing on
plaintiffs' motion for class  certification and took the matter under submission
after further  briefing,  as ordered by the court, was submitted by the parties.
On July 10, 2002,  the Court entered an order vacating the current trial date of
January 13, 2003 (as well as the  pre-trial  and  discovery  cut-off  dates) and
stayed the case in its entirety through November 7, 2002 so that the parties can
have an  opportunity  to discuss  settlement.  On October  30,  2002,  the court
entered an order extending the stay in effect through January 10, 2003.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first amended  complaint.  The first amended complaint in the Heller action is
brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserts  claims for among other
things  breach  of  fiduciary  duty;  unfair  competition;   conversion,  unjust
enrichment;  and judicial  dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a
motion to  consolidate  the Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that
the Heller action was filed in order to preserve the derivative claims that were
dismissed  without  leave to amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated
July 10, 2001. On October 5, 2001, the Managing  General  Partner and affiliated
defendants  moved to strike the first  amended  complaint  in its  entirety  for
violating  the Court's July 10, 2001 order  granting in part and denying in part
defendants'  demurrer in the Nuanes action, or alternatively,  to strike certain
portions of the complaint based on the statute of limitations.  Other defendants
in the action  demurred to the fourth  amended  complaint,  and,  alternatively,
moved to strike the complaint. On December 11, 2001, the court heard argument on
the motions  and took the matters  under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the
Court  served  notice of its order  granting  defendants'  motion to strike  the
Heller complaint as a violation of its July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes action.
On March 27, 2002,  the plaintiffs  filed a notice  appealing the order striking
the complaint. The parties are currently in the midst of briefing that appeal.

The Managing  General Partner does not anticipate that any costs,  whether legal
or  settlement  costs,  associated  with  these  cases will be  material  to the
Partnership's overall operations.


ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

            a) Exhibits:

                  Exhibit 3, Agreement of Limited  Partnership,  incorporated by
                  reference to Exhibit A to the  Prospectus  of the  Partnership
                  dated  September 20, 1983, as amended on June 13, 1989, and as
                  thereafter   supplemented,   contained  in  the   Registrant's
                  Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Reg. No. 2-79007).

                  Exhibit 99, Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                  Financial Officer.

            b) Reports on Form 8-K:

                  None filed during the quarter ended September 30, 2002.



<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES



In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.



                                    CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX


                                    By:   FOX PARTNERS II
                                          Its General Partner


                                    By:   FOX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
                                          Its Managing General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                          Patrick J. Foye
                                          Executive Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Thomas C. Novosel
                                          Thomas C. Novosel
                                          Senior Vice President
                                          and Chief Accounting Officer


                                    Date: November 13, 2002



<PAGE>



                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Patrick J. Foye, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Century  Properties
Fund XIX;


2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;


3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:


      a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
      material   information   relating  to  the   registrant,   including   its
      consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by others  within  those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;


      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing  date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


      c)  Presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our  conclusions   about  the
      effectiveness  of the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based on our
      evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):


      a) All  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record,
      process,  summarize and report  financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


      b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
      employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
      controls; and


6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date:  November 13, 2002

                                    _______________________
                                    Patrick J. Foye
                                    Executive  Vice  President  of  Fox  Capital
                                    Management  Corporation,  equivalent  of the
                                    chief executive officer of the Partnership


<PAGE>



                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Paul J. McAuliffe, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Century  Properties
Fund XIX;


2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;


3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:


      a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
      material   information   relating  to  the   registrant,   including   its
      consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by others  within  those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;


      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing  date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


      c)  Presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our  conclusions   about  the
      effectiveness  of the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based on our
      evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):


      a) All  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record,
      process,  summarize and report  financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


      b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
      employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
      controls; and


6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date:  November 13, 2002

                                  _______________________
                                  Paul J. McAuliffe
                                  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
                                  Officer of Fox Capital Management Corporation,
                                  equivalent of the chief financial officer of
                                  the Partnership



<PAGE>


Exhibit 99


                          Certification of CEO and CFO
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Century  Properties
Fund XIX (the "Partnership"),  for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  Patrick J. Foye, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of
the Partnership, and Paul J. McAuliffe, as the equivalent of the chief financial
officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Partnership.


                                    /s/  Patrick J. Foye
                                    Name:  Patrick J. Foye
                                    Date: November 13, 2002


                                    /s/  Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Name:  Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Date: November 13, 2002


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the  Partnership for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.