alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
March 28: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL in Syria and Iraq
 By CJTF - Operation Inherent Resolve News Release
  March 28, 2015 Release # 20150328FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **SOUTHWEST ASIA -** On March 27, coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria, using attack, fighter and bomber aircraft to conduct four airstrikes. Separately in Iraq, coalition military forces conducted 18 airstrikes approved by the Iraqi Ministry of Defense, using attack, fighter and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL terrorists. All strikes took place between 8 a.m., March 27, and 8 a.m., March 28, local time. The following is a summary of the strikes conducted since the last press release: **Syria** * Near Kobani, four airstrikes struck two ISIL tactical units, destroyed two anti-aircraft artillery machine guns, three ISIL vehicles, one excavator, and damaged one ISIL fighting position. **Iraq** * Near Tikrit, eight airstrikes struck two large ISIL units and one ISIL tactical unit, destroyed one ISIL vehicle, one ISIL vehicle borne explosive device, and destroyed 11 and damaged one fighting positions. * Near Fallujah, three airstrikes struck one ISIL tactical unit and destroyed two anti-aircraft artillery guns and an ISIL vehicle. * Near Mosul, three airstrikes destroyed two IED construction/facilitation buildings, one other building, an armored vehicle, and one fighting position. * Near Tal Afar, two airstrikes destroyed one machine gun, one building and one excavator. * Near Ar Rutbah, one airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit. * Near Bayji, one airstrike struck one ISIL tactical unit. Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely. The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria, the region, and the wider international community. The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Iraq include Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, Netherlands, United Kingdom and U.S. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Syria include Bahrain, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and U.S.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0934.html[7/21/2015 6:34:32 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-bhix

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0934

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Sabrina Good

General Comment

This is an insult to my intelligence. I am perfectly capable of planning for my own retirement. I neither want nor

 need any help from the government in my personal retirement decisions and plans.
H. Res. 127

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 2, 2001.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 10) to provide for

pension reform, and for other purposes. The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. In lieu of the amendment

recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means and the

amendment recommended by the Committee on Education

and the Workforce now printed in the bill, the amendment in

the nature of a substitute printed in the Congressional

Record and numbered 1 pursuant to clause 8 of rule XVIII

shall be considered as adopted. The previous question shall

be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any

further amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) 90 minutes of debate on the bill,

as amended, with 60 minutes equally divided and controlled

by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means and 30 minutes equally divided

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member
2

•HRES 127 EH

of the Committee on Education and the Workforce; (2) the

further amendment printed in the report of the Committee on

Rules accompanying this resolution, which may be offered

only by a Member designated in the report, shall be in order

without intervention of any point of order, shall be considered

as read, and shall be separately debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent;

and (3) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>                      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
                              INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM REGISTRANT'S FORM 10K
                              FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS
                              QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
                              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                        119427
<SECURITIES>                  1240241
<RECEIVABLES>                 106968
<ALLOWANCES>                  4676
<INVENTORY>                   2590
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              1645095
<PP&E>                        182224
<DEPRECIATION>                117185
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                2345985
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         291153
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   5680
<COMMON>                      17681
<OTHER-SE>                    1418442
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  2345985
<SALES>                       22200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              491547
<CGS>                         13833
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 397350
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               103036
<INCOME-TAX>                  32300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           42433
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  42433
<EPS-BASIC>                   1.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                 1.00



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 49283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4221]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Notice of Establishment

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 
U.S.C. Appendix 2), the Director, National Institutes of Health (NIH), 
announces the establishment of the Scientific Management Review Board 
(SMRB).
    The NIH Reform Act of 2006 (Pub. L. 109-482) provides 
organizational authorities to HHS and NIH officials to: (1) Establish 
or abolish national research institutes; (2) reorganize the offices 
within the Office of the Director, NIH including adding, removing, or 
transferring the functions of such offices or establishing or 
terminating such offices; and (3) reorganize, divisions, centers, or 
other administrative units within an NIH national research institute or 
national center including adding, removing, or transferring the 
functions of such units, or establishing or terminating such units. The 
purpose of the Scientific Management Review Board (also referred to as 
SMRB or Board) is to advise appropriate HHS and NIH officials on the 
use of these organizational authorities and identify the reasons 
underlying the recommendations.
    Duration of this committee is tow years from the date of Charter is 
filed.

    Dated: August 20, 2007.
Elias A. Zerhouni,
Director, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 07-4221 Filed 8-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
A01A0429.

#### ASKEW v. THE STATE.

(546 SE2d 15)

Phipps, Judge.

Michael Askew, an inmate at a state prison, was charged with knowingly and wilfully obstructing prison guards Taylor and Lee in the lawful discharge of their official duties.1 The jury found Askew guilty on both counts. He appeals.

1. He first challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict on the ground that the testimony of the prison guards was not credible. The sufficiency of the evidence is not, however, subject to challenge on this ground.

> On appeal from a criminal conviction, . . . the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict. An appellate court determines only if a rational trier of fact could find all the essential elements of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt; the appellate court does not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility. Conflicts in witness testimony are matters of credibility for the jury to resolve. And as long as there is some evidence, even though contradicted, to support each fact necessary for the state’s case, the verdict will be upheld.2

It is undisputed that at the time of the incident in this case, Askew was being held in the medical unit of the prison awaiting transfer to another facility, that he objected to the transfer, and that Officers Taylor and Lee entered his cell to escort him out. Officers Taylor, Lee, and Evans testified that, without provocation, Askew pushed Officer Taylor and bit Officer Lee after they came into his cell. Lee and his treating nurse testified that as a result of the bite, ¡ he was given HIV and hepatitis tests. Although Askew testified that *231the officers assaulted him without provocation and that he did not push or bite anyone, the State’s evidence authorized the jury to find Askew guilty of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt.

Decided February 22, 2001.

*McGee & McGee, James B. McGee III,*for appellant.

*Richard E. Currie, District Attorney, James D. Lamb, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

2. Askew next claims that the trial court erred in not allowing him to speak for himself at sentencing. The sentencing transcript belies this assertion.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Smith, P. J., and Barnes, J., concur.*

1

 OCGA § 16-10-24 (b).

2

 (Footnotes omitted.) *Martin v. State,*246 Ga. App. 708, 709 (1) (541 SE2d 692) (2000).
1210-AB32-2-1130.html[7/24/2015 6:15:52 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvq-a8ci

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1624

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Eric Mcghee

Address:

Lepanto, AR, 72354

General Comment

I'm smart enough to plan for my own retirement.
**Exhibit 24-7**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

**KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS** that I, **Paul L. Joskow** do hereby appoint John W. Rowe and William A. Von Hoene, Jr.,or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2007 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities andExchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present. 

**Paul L. Joskow**

**DATE: February 1, 2008**
-----Original Message-----

From: RICHARD KAUFFMANN [mailto:rxk@charter.net] 

Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2015 3:57 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN1210-AB32

Gentlemen -

When Delta Airlines emerged from bankruptcy they were allowed to eliminate my retirement 

plan by assigning it to the PBGC. The PBGC then reduced my pension by 85% because I retired prior to 

the normal retirement age of 65, even though as an airline pilot i was required to do so by the FAA 

regulation mandating retirement at age 60. The DOL and EBSA were no help in any of these 

transactions.

Eliminating my ability to trade options in my IRA would be no help now. I have been successful 

in selling covered calls and cash secured puts in my IRA. Since I do not have enough years left to wait for 

my stocks to appreciate this is the best way I have found to replace some of this lost revenue.

Thank you for the opportunity to register a comment, Richard Kauffmann

4381 North Elizabeth Lane

Atlanta GA 30339

rxk@charter.net
Exhibit 4.4


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE ESCROW AGREEMENT


 


THIS FIRST
AMENDMENT TO THE ESCROW AGREEMENT BETWEEN EAST KANSAS AGRI-ENERGY, LLC (“EKAE”)
AND GARNETT STATE SAVINGS BANK as escrow agent (the “Escrow Agent”) is made and
entered into effective as of the 31st day of December, 2003 (the
“Effective Date”) by and between EKAE and the Escrow Agent.


 


WHEREAS, EKAE
and Escrow Agent agree to amend the Escrow Agreement between them.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, it is agreed that the Escrow Agreement is amended as follows:


 


1.  Paragraph 6 is amended by deleting Paragraph
6 in its entirety and substituting in lieu thereof the following:


 


6.   TERMINATION OF ESCROW.  This Agreement and the Escrow created
hereunder shall be terminated as provided in paragraph 7 hereof or as of February
13, 2004.


 


2.  Except as specifically amended above, all of
the provisions of the Escrow Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have hereunto affixed their signatures as of the
day and year first written above.


 


	
  EKAE:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  EAST KANSAS
  AGRI-ENERGY, L.L.C.

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
    /s/ William R. Pracht

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  William R.
  Pracht, President

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  ESCROW
  AGENT:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  GARNETT
  STATE SAVINGS BANK

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Dwight Nelson

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  Dwight Nelson

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Vice President
-----Original Message-----

From: Ann Hanus [mailto:ann.hanus@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2015 12:43 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Comments for RIN 1210-AB32

I strongly support the proposed fiduciary rule change that would require a fiduciary duty to anyone 

advising people on retirement accounts. I believe this should include brokers and insurance agents as 

well. People have relied on financial advisors that have not placed the interests of their clients ahead of 

the financial advisor's own self interest. 

I have seen first hand the results of this situation when a broker under the guise of a financial advisor 

sold my 90 year old mother inappropriate funds that provided him with a high commission, and 

unfortunately my mother received losses on her investments and poor returns.

Ann Hanus

Sent from my iPad
§ 78.40-5 Securing of vehicles. ( a ) The master shall take all necessary precautions to see that automobiles or other vehicles have their motors turned off when the ferry is under way, and the motors shall not be started until the ferry is secured to the landing. In addition, the vehicles at each end shall have their wheels securely blocked, while the vessel is being navigated.
( b ) [Reserved]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6584

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus EMANUEL BROWN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CR-90-240, CA-97-761-1) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 9, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Emanuel Brown, Appellant Pro Se. John Warren Stone, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Brown , Nos. CR-90-240; CA-97-761-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 2, 1998). Appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0696.html[7/21/2015 9:48:46 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-clsi

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0696

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Llance Boil

General Comment

I'm smart enough to plan for my own retirement, I want no government involvement.
#### § 238.219 Truck-to-car-body attachment.

Except as provided in § 238.201(b), passenger equipment shall have a truck-to-carbody attachment with an ultimate strength sufficient to resist without failure the following individually applied loads: 2g vertically on the mass of the truck; and 250,000 pounds in any horizontal direction on the truck, along with the resulting vertical reaction to this load. For purposes of this section, the mass of the truck includes axles, wheels, bearings, the truck-mounted brake system, suspension system components, and any other component attached to the truck by design.

[67 FR 19991, Apr. 23, 2002, as amended at 83 FR 59219, Nov. 21, 2018]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1414.html[7/23/2015 9:42:00 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvn-mqrn

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1414

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: robert Anonymous

General Comment

I have planned for my retirement since I started working 40 years ago. I don't need anyone in the government

 telling me how to save my money or how much to save-It's my life-and my decisions

HANDS OFF
-----Original Message-----

From: Anne Muldoon [mailto:anne.muldoon@comcast.net] 

Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2015 9:30 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

My job is to manage the ESOP for my company. So many of our employees have no idea where to invest 

their distributions. They don't have basic investing knowledge and some of them have some crazy ideas 

about the economy ( they say it's from listening to Ron Paul-- I don't know what he's saying but he sure 

is creating fear). I suspect that many of our ESOP participants are being targeted by financial advisors 

because the Plan has done very well. I tell people not to invest in anything they don't understand. They 

need financial advisors they can trust and if they knew what Michelle Singletary wrote about they would 

be very dismayed. The lack of financial "savvy" is what allows unscrupulous people to prosper off the 

unwitting backs of others. This needs to change. Please consider the breadth of this problem. It is 

heartbreaking to see so many people making poor decisions because the don't understand investing and 

don't know who to trust.

Anne Muldoon

Sent from my iPad
#### Harriet L. Scott, *Appellant, v.*John H. Gregory, Respondent.—

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Pratt, J.;

Dykman, J., not sitting.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RegeneRx (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending March 31, 2007 (the “Report”), I, C. Neil Lyons,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 
| (1)    |   |   The Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                    |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
| (2)    |   |   The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as  of and for the periods presented in this report. |

 

 
| Date:   | May 15, 2008        |   |   |
|-------------------|--------------------------|--------|--------|
|              |                     |
|              |  /s/C. Neil Lyons   |
|              | C. Neil Lyons            |
|              | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----