alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 375.303 If I sell liability insurance coverage, what must I do? ( a ) You, your employee, or an agent may sell, offer to sell, or procure liability insurance coverage for loss or damage to shipments of any individual shipper only when the individual shipper releases the shipment for transportation at a value not exceeding 60 cents per pound ($1.32 per kilogram) per article.
( b ) You may offer, sell, or procure any type of insurance policy on behalf of the individual shipper covering loss or damage in excess of the specified carrier liability.
( c ) If you sell, offer to sell, or procure liability insurance coverage for loss or damage to shipments: ( 1 ) You must issue to the individual shipper a policy or other appropriate evidence of the insurance that the individual shipper purchased.
( 2 ) You must provide a copy of the policy or other appropriate evidence to the individual shipper at the time you sell or procure the insurance.
( 3 ) You must issue policies written in plain English.
( 4 ) You must clearly specify the nature and extent of coverage under the policy.
( 5 ) Your failure to issue a policy, or other appropriate evidence of insurance purchased, to an individual shipper will subject you to full liability for any claims to recover loss or damage attributed to you.
( 6 ) You must provide in your tariff for the provision of selling, offering to sell, or procuring liability insurance coverage. The tariff must also provide for the base transportation charge, including your assumption of full liability for the value of the shipment. This would be in the event you fail to issue a policy or other appropriate evidence of insurance to the individual shipper at the time of purchase.
[69 FR 10575, Mar. 5, 2004]
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Nov.-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  Feb-28-1997
<CASH>                        1,291,316
<SECURITIES>                  000
<RECEIVABLES>                 138,313
<ALLOWANCES>                  (109,965)
<INVENTORY>                   000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              000
<PP&E>                        000
<DEPRECIATION>                000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                8,502,624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         441,275
<BONDS>                       000
<COMMON>                      000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         000
<PREFERRED>                   000
<OTHER-SE>                    8,061,349
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  8,502,624
<SALES>                       467,733
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              855,881
<CGS>                         000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              371,786
<LOSS-PROVISION>              000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            000
<INCOME-PRETAX>               000
<INCOME-TAX>                  000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           484,095
<DISCONTINUED>                000
<EXTRAORDINARY>               3,232,132
<CHANGES>                     000
<NET-INCOME>                  3,716,227
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 36.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                 36.79
        

</TABLE>
1210-AB32-2-1613.html[7/26/2015 9:03:28 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jxy-y66o

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2110

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Lawrence Mitchell

Address:

651 S. Rt. 21

Gurnee, IL, 60031

Email: larry_j_m@yahoo.com

Phone: 847 367 6459

General Comment

Self directed IRA's should remain "SELF DIRECTED" by the owner of the IRA. This Country was founded

 believing in personal responsibility. As an individual, I do not want the Government involved in determining my

 investment decisions.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 866

To prohibit the provision of financial assistance by the Federal Government

to any person who is more than 60 days delinquent in the payment

of any child support obligation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 6, 2001

Mr. BILIRAKIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Govenment Reform

A BILL

To prohibit the provision of financial assistance by the Federal Government to any person who is more than 60

days delinquent in the payment of any child support

obligation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Subsidy Termination

5 for Overdue Payments Act of 2001’’.
2

•HR 866 IH

1 SEC. 2. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CHILD SUP2 PORT OBLIGATIONS REQUIRED AS A CONDI3 TION OF RECEIVING FEDERAL FINANCIAL AS4 SISTANCE.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsections

6 (b) and (c), an agency or instrumentality of the Federal

7 Government may not provide financial assistance to an ap8 plicant therefor unless the agency or instrumentality has

9 obtained from the applicant a certification that the appli10 cant is—

11 (1) not more than 60 days delinquent in the

12 payment of any child support obligation imposed by

13 a court or an order of an administrative process es14 tablished under State law; or

15 (2) if so delinquent, in compliance with a plan

16 or agreement entered into between the applicant and

17 the person to whom the payment is to be made or

18 a State providing services to the person with respect

19 to the collection of the support.

20 (b) EXEMPTION FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE THAT

21 IS SUBJECT TO GARNISHMENT FOR FAILURE TO PAY

22 CHILD SUPPORT.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to an

23 amount of financial assistance to be provided to an appli24 cant to the extent that the amount is subject to garnish25 ment by reason of the failure of the applicant to pay a

26 child support obligation.
3

•HR 866 IH

1 (c) GOOD CAUSE EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall

2 not apply to an applicant for financial assistance with re3 spect to any period for which the applicant has good cause

4 (as determined by the agency or instrumentality involved)

5 for having failed to pay a child support obligation de6 scribed in subsection (a)(1), or having failed to enter into

7 or comply with a plan or agreement described in sub8 section (a)(2).

9 (d) REGULATIONS.—Within 6 months after the date

10 of the enactment of this section, each agency or instru11 mentality of the Federal Government that provides finan12 cial assistance shall prescribe such regulations as may be

13 necessary to comply with this section.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1 Agreed to House (ATH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 1

           Electing officers of the House of Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2001

  Mr. Watts of Oklahoma submitted the following resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
           Electing officers of the House of Representatives.

    Resolved, That Jeffrey J. Trandahl of the State of South Dakota, 
be, and is hereby, chosen Clerk of the House of Representatives.
    Resolved, That Wilson S. Livingood of the Commonwealth of Virginia, 
be, and is hereby, chosen Sergeant at Arms of the House of 
Representatives.
    Resolved, That James M. Eagen, III, of the Commonwealth of 
Pennsylvania, be, and is hereby, chosen Chief Administrative Officer of 
the House of Representatives.
    Resolved, That Father Daniel P. Coughlin of the State of Illinois, 
be, and is hereby, chosen Chaplain of the House of Representatives.
                                 <all>
```
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-31352

Summary Calendar

ELIJAH DAVIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

MARVIN T. RUNYON, JR. POSTMASTER GENERAL; 

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Louisiana

(96-CV-2741)

August 6, 1998

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Elijah Davis, plaintiff-appellant, appeals the decision of the

district court granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants

and dismissing Davis’s claim with prejudice. We have reviewed the

parties’ briefs, record excerpts, and relevant portions of the
record itself and find no reversible error. We affirm for

essentially the same reasons stated by the district court in its

memorandum ruling and order dated July 17, 1997. 

Davis’s motion for appointment of counsel on appeal is DENIED.

AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
Hagel, King of Bahrain discuss regional security issues
 By , American Forces Press Service
  **WASHINGTON –** Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel met with His Majesty King Hamad al Khalifa of Bahrain at Safria Palace in Bahrain and the two leaders exchanged views on shared regional security challenges, including Iran and the signed joint plan of action between the P5+1 and Iran, Assistant Pentagon Press Secretary Carl Woog said in a statement issued Dec. 6. Woog’s statement reads as follows: Secretary Hagel met with His Majesty King Hamad al Khalifa of Bahrain this afternoon at the Safria Palace. Secretary Hagel and the king discussed the long history of the United States - Bahrain bilateral relationship. Secretary Hagel emphasized the U.S. commitment to Gulf security and discussed the speech he will present to the IISS Manama Dialogue tomorrow. The secretary and the king exchanged views on shared regional security challenges, including Iran and the signed joint plan of action between the P5+1 and Iran. The meeting included significant discussion of reform in Bahrain and the importance of political inclusiveness for long term stability. The secretary thanked King Hamad for hosting the U.S. 5th fleet and ongoing security cooperation.
1210-AB32-2-1101.html[7/24/2015 5:52:33 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvq-wvx1

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1595

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Jerry Knoff

Address:

1156 Lake Point Way

Suwanee, GA, 30024

Email: jerryknoff@gmail.com

General Comment

I am absolutely AGAINST The Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) Proposed Rule, because I

 know how to AND demand my RIGHT to make my own investment decisions. It is MY money and NOT any

 business of the federal government. Stay out of my money.
Advance Monthly Sales for Retail and Food Services Scheduled Release Dates

______________________________________________________________________________

The scheduled dates for the Advance Monthly Retail Trade Reports for 2023/2024 are as follows:

Data Month Release Date Release Time

October 2023 November 15, 2023 8:30 am

November 2023 December 14, 2023 8:30 am

December 2023 January 17, 2024 8:30 am

January 2024 February 15, 2024 8:30 am

February 2024 March 14, 2024 8:30 am

March 2024 April 15, 2024 8:30 am

April 2024 May 15, 2024 8:30 am

May 2024 June 18, 2024 8:30 am

June 2024 July 16, 2024 8:30 am

July 2024 August 15, 2024 8:30 am

August 2024 September 17, 2024 8:30 am

September 2024 October 17, 2024 8:30 am

October 2024 November 15, 2024 8:30 am

November 2024 December 17, 2024 8:30 am

December 2024 To be announced at a later date

Source: Retail Indicators Branch, U.S. Census Bureau | Last Revised: October 31, 2023
1210-AB32-2-1183.html[7/24/2015 7:24:59 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvr-ggud

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1677

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Wendy Mueller

Address:

P.O.Box 512438

Punta Gorda, FL, 33951

Email: Hyoffice@bellsouth.net

General Comment

Gentlemen,

I have stayed in the United States of America rather than leave, due to the freedoms that I am afforded. When my

 freedoms are removed my reason not to stay in a communist state will be clear. I and many others will leave. Do

 not take anymore of my freedoms from me or my country men.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARTIN MAGANA-PARDO, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 15-71151 

Agency No. A027-581-834 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an 

Immigration Judge’s Decision

Submitted January 16, 2018**

Before: REINHARDT, TROTT, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Martin Magana-Pardo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review 

of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) determination under 8 C.F.R. § 1208.31(a) that he 

did not have a reasonable fear of persecution or torture and thus is not entitled to 

relief from his reinstated removal order. We have jurisdiction under

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JAN 22 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-71151 

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the IJ’s factual findings. 

Andrade-Garcia v. Lynch, 828 F.3d 829, 833 (9th Cir. 2016). We deny the petition 

for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Magana-Pardo 

failed to demonstrate a reasonable possibility of persecution on account of a 

protected ground. See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1016, 1018 (9th Cir. 2003) 

(possibility of future persecution “too speculative”).

Substantial evidence also supports the IJ’s determination that Magana-Pardo 

failed to demonstrate a reasonable possibility of torture by or with the consent or 

acquiescence of the government of Mexico. See Zheng v. Holder, 644 F.3d 829, 

835-36 (9th Cir. 2011) (fear of torture speculative).

We reject Magana Pardo’s contention that the IJ failed to consider evidence.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
SUPREME COURT.

#### Musgrave agt. Webster.

*Demurrer—Answer.*

When a defendant demurs to a complaint upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and afterwards answers the complaint, the answer is a waiver of the demurrer.

*Special*Term, November, 1876.

Vast Vorst, *J.*

It was stated upon the argument, by the plaintiff’s counsel, that subsequent to the service of the demurrer, the defendant had answered the complaint. This statement was not denied. The only pleading, on the part of the defendant, is either a demurrer or answer. If a defendant demurs to the entire complaint, upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and afterwards answers the complaint, I should consider the answer to be a waiver of the demurrer, and as evidence of the defendant’s intention - to raise on the trial of the • issue of fact the question as to whether the complaint disclosed a cause of action. By answering he does not waive an objection of that character (Code, § 148).

The waiver of the demurrer leaves no issue of law to be determined, and no judgment thereon would be proper.

The hearing is dismissed, but without costs.
Exhibit
10.37

June 15, 2005

John W. Henry & Company, Inc.

301 Yamato Road, Suite 2200
 Boca Raton, Fl. 33431-4931

Attn:
Mr. Ken Webster

Re: Management Agreement Renewals

Dear Mr. Webster:

We are writing with respect to your
management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference
is made below (the "Management Agreements").
We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30,
2006 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain
unchanged.

		
	• 	Shearson Mid-West
Futures Fund


		
	• 	Shearson Lehman
Select Advisors Futures Fund
L.P.


		
	• 	Smith Barney Mid-West
Futures Fund L.P. II


		
	• 	Smith
Barney Westport Futures Fund L.P.


		
	• 	Hutton Investors Futures Fund,
L.P. II (HIFF II)


		
	• 	AURORA
2001


		
	• 	AURORA
III


		
	• 	Salomon Smith Barney
Diversified 2000 Futures Fund
L.P.


		
	• 	Alera
100


		
	• 	JWH Strategic Allocation
Master Fund LLC


		
	• 	Citigroup
Diversified Futures Fund


Please acknowledge receipt of this
modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the
attention of Mr. Daniel McAuliffe at the address above or fax to
212-793-1986. If you have any questions I can be reached at
212-559-5043.

Very truly yours,

CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES
LLC

By:    /s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.


Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
 Chief
Financial Officer & Director

JOHN W. HENRY & COMPANY,
INC.

By:    /s/ Ken Webster


Print
Name:    Ken Webster


DRMcA/sr
<PAGE>   1


                COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

            Exhibit 23 - Consent of Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Forms S-8 No. 33-43841, No. 33-27213, and No. 333-15929) of our
report dated August 13, 1999 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Comprehensive Care Corporation and subsidiaries for the year
ended May 31, 1999, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended May 31, 1999.

/s/ Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP
------------------------------------
New York, New York
August 27, 1999
1210-AB32-2-1363.html[7/26/2015 2:34:37 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvz-aewq

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1859

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I do not want the government involved in how I use my own money for my retirement. I will handle it myself.

 Thank you very much for thinking of me.
#### Louis Steiner and others agt. Catharine Ainsworth.

*Costs—Examination of pa/t'ty before trial.*

For attending the examination of a party before trial, ten dollars is tax- . able under subdivision 3 of section 307 of the Code, where such party attends ready to he examined, although the examination is then waived and is never had.

*Saratoga Special*Term, November, 1876.

There were two actions pending against the same defendant, one in favor of Hecht and others, and the other in favor of Steiner and others.

The answers had been served, and the plaintiffs in each case obtained an order from the Saratoga county judge to examine the defendant before trial under section 391 of the Code.

The defendant and the attorneys for both parties resided at Saratoga Springs.

The orders were returnable at p. m., , 1876, at which time the counsel for both parties and the defendant personally appeared before the county judge and the defendant was sworn and examined in the Hecht case, which was closed within an hour. The plaintiff’s attorney then waived any examination of the defendant in the Steiner case, and the defendant was not sworn or examined in that case, but the proceeding was dropped and the cases were afterward discontinued.

The defendant’s attorneys claimed ten dollars in each case for attending such hearing before the county judge, and the clerk taxed the same in each bill, and the plaintiff in the *32Steiner case made a motion to review the adjustment of costs in the nature of an appeal from the allowance of that item.

*E. F.*Bullard, for plaintiff,

contended that the - attorney for the defendant was paid by the ten dollars allowed in the other case. Second. That, as no examination had ever been had in the Steiner case, the service was never performed for which the statute allows the ten dollars, and, therefore, it should not he taxed against the opposite party.

*A.*Pond, for defendant.

The court, Landon, J., held that the ten dollars was properly allowed in each case, and affirmed the adjustment of costs.
#### § 533.1 Scope.

This part establishes average fuel economy standards pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 32902 for light trucks.

[89 FR 52949, June 24, 2024]
<PAGE>  82



                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Coachmen Industries, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I,
Claire C. Skinner, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

             (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

             (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the period(s) covered in the Report.


                         By:  /s/ CLAIRE C. SKINNER
                              ----------------------
                              Claire C. Skinner
                              Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  March 28, 2003