Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2023 / Notices 57457 

4. It is further ordered that, in 

addition to the resolution of the 

foregoing issues, it shall be determined, 

pursuant to section 503(b)(1) of the Act, 

47 U.S.C. 503(b)(1), whether an order of 

forfeiture should be issued against 

Jennifer Juarez in an amount not to 

exceed the statutory limit for the willful 

and/or repeated violation of each rule 

section above, including §§ 1.17, 1.65, 

73.1015, 73.1150, and 73.3540 of the 

Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.17, 1.65, 

73.1015, 73.1150, and 73.3540, and each 

statutory provision noted above, 

including sections 310(b) and (d) of the 

Act, 47 U.S.C. 310(b) and (d), for which 

the statute of limitations in section 

503(b)(6) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(6), 

has not lapsed. 

5. It is further ordered that, 

irrespective of the resolution of the 

foregoing issues, it shall be determined, 

pursuant to sections 503(b)(1) of the 

Act, 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(1), whether an 

order of forfeiture should be issued 

against Antonio Cesar Guel and/or 

Hispanic Christian Community 

Network, Inc. in an amount not to 

exceed the statutory limit for the willful 

and/or repeated violation of each rule 

section above, including § 1.17 of the 

Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.17, and 

each statutory provision noted above, 

including sections 301 and 308 of the 

Act, 47 U.S.C. 301 and 308, for which 

the statute of limitations in section 

503(b)(6) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(6), 

has not lapsed. 

6. It is further ordered that, pursuant 

to sections 309(d) and 312(c) of the Act, 

47 U.S.C. 309(d), 312(c), and §§ 1.91(c), 

and 1.221(c) of the Commission’s rules, 

47 CFR 1.91(c) and 1.221(c), to avail 

herself of the opportunity to be heard 

and to present evidence at a hearing in 

this proceeding, Jennifer Juarez, in 

person or by an attorney, shall file with 

the Commission, within twenty (20) 

days of the mailing of this Order to 

Show Cause Why A Cease and Desist 

Order Should Not Be Issued, Order to 

Show Cause Why an Order of 

Revocation Should Not Be Issued, 

Hearing Designation Order, Notice of 

Opportunity for Hearing, and Notice of 

Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, a 

written appearance stating that she will 

appear at the hearing and present 

evidence on the issues specified above. 

7. It is further ordered that, pursuant 

to § 1.221(c) of the Commission’s rules, 

47 CFR 1.221(c), if Jennifer Juarez fails 

to file within the time specified above 

a written appearance, a petition to 

dismiss without prejudice, or a petition 

to accept for good cause shown an 

untimely written appearance, the 

captioned applications shall be 

dismissed with prejudice for failure to 

prosecute. 

8. It is further ordered, pursuant to 

§§ 1.91 and 1.92 of the Commission’s 

rules, 47 CFR 1.91 and 1.92, that if 

Jennifer Juarez fails to file a written 

appearance within the time specified 

above, or has not filed prior to the 

expiration of that time a petition to 

dismiss without prejudice, or a petition 

to accept, for good cause shown, such 

written appearance beyond expiration of 

said 20 days, the right to a hearing shall 

be deemed waived. Where a hearing is 

waived, the Administrative Law Judge 

shall issue an order terminating the 

hearing proceeding and certifying the 

case to the Commission. If Jennifer 

Juarez waives her right to a hearing 

pursuant to § 1.92(a)(1) or (a)(3), 47 CFR 

1.92(a)(1) or (a)(3), she may submit a 

timely written statement denying or 

seeking to mitigate or justify the 

circumstances or conduct complained of 

in the order to show cause. 

9. It is further ordered that the Chief, 

Enforcement Bureau, shall be made a 

party to this proceeding without the 

need to file a written appearance. 

10. It is further ordered that, in 

accordance with section 312(d) of the 

Act, 47 U.S.C. 312(d), and § 1.91(d) of 

the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.91(d), 

the burden of proceeding with the 

introduction of evidence and the burden 

of proof with respect to the issues (h), 

(i), and (k)–(q) of Paragraph 113, above, 

shall be upon the Commission’s 

Enforcement Bureau. 

11. It is further ordered that, pursuant 

to section 309(e) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 

309(e), and § 1.254 of the Commission’s 

rules, 47 CFR 1.254, the burden of 

proceeding with the introduction of 

evidence and the burden of proof shall 

be upon Jennifer Juarez as to issues (a)– 

(g) and (j) at Paragraph 113 above. 

12. It is further ordered that, in 

accordance with section 312(d) of the 

Act, 47 U.S.C. 312(d), and § 1.91(d) of 

the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.91(d), 

the burden of proceeding with the 

introduction of evidence and the burden 

of proof shall be upon the Commission 

as to issues (a)–(d) at Paragraph 114 

above. 

13. It is further ordered that a copy of 

each document filed in this proceeding 

subsequent to the date of adoption of 

this document shall be served on the 

counsel of record appearing on behalf of 

the Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Parties 

may inquire as to the identity of such 

counsel by calling the Investigations & 

Hearings Division of the Enforcement 

Bureau at (202) 418–1420. Such service 

copy shall be addressed to the named 

counsel of record, Investigations & 

Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, 

Federal Communications Commission, 

45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554. 

14. It is further ordered that the 

parties to the captioned application 

shall, pursuant to section 311(a)(2) of 

the Act, 47 U.S.C. 311(a)(2), and 

§ 73.3594 of the Commission’s rules, 47 

CFR 73.3594, GIVE NOTICE of the 

hearing within the time and in the 

manner prescribed in such Rule, and 

shall advise the Commission of the 

satisfaction of such requirements as 

mandated by § 73.3594 of the 

Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 73.3594. 

15. It is further ordered that copies of 

this Order to Show Cause Why A Cease 

and Desist Order Should Not Be Issued, 

Order to Show Cause Why an Order of 

Revocation Should Not Be Issued, 

Hearing Designation Order, Notice of 

Opportunity for Hearing, and Notice of 

Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall 

be sent via Certified Mail, Return 

Receipt Requested, and by regular firstclass mail to: 

Antonio Cesar Guel, 2605 Hyacinth 

Drive, Mesquite, TX 75181; 

Hispanic Christian Community 

Network, Inc., 8500 N Stemmons 

Freeway, Suite 5050, Dallas, TX 75247; 

Jennifer Juarez, 1138 N Tillery 

Avenue, Dallas, TX 75211; and 

Dan J. Alpert, Esq., The Law Office of 

Dan J. Alpert, 2120 N. 21st Road, 

Arlington, VA 22201. 

16. It is further ordered that the 

Secretary of the Commission shall cause 

to have this Order to Show Cause Why 

A Cease and Desist Order Should Not Be 

Issued, Order to Show Cause Why an 

Order of Revocation Should Not Be 

Issued, Hearing Designation Order, and 

Notice of Opportunity for Hearing, and 

Notice of Apparent Liability for 

Forfeiture or a summary thereof 

published in the Federal Register. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Thomas Horan 

Chief of Staff, Media Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 2023–18230 Filed 8–22–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

[OMB 3060–1053; FR ID 164698] 

Information Collection Being Reviewed 

by the Federal Communications 

Commission 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort 

to reduce paperwork burdens, and as 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
57458 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2023 / Notices 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995 (PRA), the Federal 

Communications Commission (FCC or 

Commission) invites the general public 

and other Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collections. 

Comments are requested concerning: 

whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimate; ways to enhance the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; ways to minimize 

the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology; and ways to 

further reduce the information 

collection burden on small business 

concerns with fewer than 25 employees. 

DATES: Written PRA comments should 

be submitted on or before October 23, 

2023. If you anticipate that you will be 

submitting comments but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the contact listed below as soon 

as possible. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to 

Cathy Williams, FCC, via email to PRA@

fcc.gov and to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information about the 

information collection, contact Cathy 

Williams at (202) 418–2918. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FCC 

may not conduct or sponsor a collection 

of information unless it displays a 

currently valid Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) control number. No 

person shall be subject to any penalty 

for failing to comply with a collection 

of information subject to the PRA that 

does not display a valid OMB control 

number. 

OMB Control Number: 3060–1053. 

Title: Misuse of internet Protocol 

Captioned Telephone Service (IP CTS); 

Telecommunications Relay Services and 

Speech-to-Speech Services for 

Individuals with Hearing and Speech 

Disabilities, CG Docket Nos. 13–24 and 

03–123. 

Form Number: N/A. 

Type of Review: Revision of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other forprofit; Individuals or households. 

Number of Respondents and 

Responses: 187,173 respondents; 

673,980 responses. 

Estimated Time per Response: 0.1 

hours (6 minutes) to 40 hours. 

Frequency of Response: Annual, every 

five years, monthly, and ongoing 

reporting requirements; Recordkeeping 

requirements; Third party disclosure 

requirements. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. The statutory 

authority for the information collection 

requirements is found at Sec. 225 [47 

U.S.C. 225] Telecommunications 

Services for Hearing-Impaired 

Individuals; The Americans with 

Disabilities Act of 1990, (ADA), Public 

Law 101–336, 104 Stat. 327, 366–69, 

enacted on July 26, 1990. 

Total Annual Burden: 342,103 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: $72,000. 

Needs and Uses: On August 1, 2003, 

the Commission released 

Telecommunication Relay Services and 

Speech-to-Speech Services for 

Individuals with Hearing and Speech 

Disabilities, CC Docket No. 98–67, 

Declaratory Ruling, 68 FR 55898, 

September 28, 2003, clarifying that oneline captioned telephone voice carry 

over (VCO) service is a type of 

telecommunications relay service (TRS) 

and that eligible providers of such 

services are eligible to recover their 

costs from the Interstate TRS Fund 

(Fund) in accordance with section 225 

of the Communications Act. 

On July 19, 2005, the Commission 

released Telecommunication Relay 

Services and Speech-to-Speech Services 

for Individuals with Hearing and Speech 

Disabilities, CC Docket No. 98–67 and 

CG Docket No. 03–123, Order, 70 FR 

54294, September 14, 2005, clarifying 

that two-line captioned telephone VCO 

service, like one-line captioned 

telephone VCO service, is a type of TRS 

eligible for compensation from the 

Fund. 

On January 11, 2007, the Commission 

released Telecommunications Relay 

Services and Speech-to-Speech Services 

for Individuals with Hearing and Speech 

Disabilities, CG Docket No. 03–123, 

Declaratory Ruling, 72 FR 6960, 

February 14, 2007, granting a request for 

clarification that internet Protocol (IP) 

captioned telephone relay service (IP 

CTS) is a type of TRS eligible for 

compensation from the Fund. 

On August 26, 2013, the Commission 

issued Misuse of internet Protocol 

Captioned Telephone Service; 

Telecommunications Relay Services and 

Speech-to-Speech Services for 

Individuals with Hearing and Speech 

Disabilities, CG Docket Nos. 13–24 and 

03–123, Report and Order, 78 FR 53684, 

August 30, 2013, to regulate practices 

relating to the marketing of IP CTS, 

impose certain requirements for the 

provision of this service, and mandate 

registration and certification of IP CTS 

users. 

On June 8, 2018, the Commission 

issued Misuse of internet Protocol 

Captioned Telephone Service; 

Telecommunications Relay Services and 

Speech-to-Speech Services for 

Individuals with Hearing and Speech 

Disabilities, CG Docket Nos. 13–24 and 

03–123, Report and Order and 

Declaratory Ruling, 83 FR 30082, June 

27, 2018 (2018 IP CTS Modernization 

Order), to facilitate the Commission’s 

efforts to reduce waste, fraud, and abuse 

and improve its ability to efficiently 

manage the IP CTS program through 

regulating practices related to the 

marketing of IP CTS, generally 

prohibiting the provision of IP CTS to 

consumers who do not genuinely need 

the service, permitting the provision of 

IP CTS in emergency shelters, and 

approving the use of automatic speech 

recognition to generate captions without 

the assistance of a communications 

assistant. 

On February 15, 2019, the 

Commission issued Misuse of internet 

Protocol Captioned Telephone Service; 

Telecommunications Relay Services and 

Speech-to-Speech Services for 

Individuals with Hearing and Speech 

Disabilities, CG Docket Nos. 13–24 and 

03–123, Report and Order, and Order, 

84 FR 8457, March 8, 2019 (2019 IP CTS 

Program Management Order), requiring 

the submission of IP CTS user 

registration information to the 

telecommunications relay service (TRS) 

User Registration Database (Database) so 

that the Database administrator can 

verify IP CTS users to reduce the risk of 

waste, fraud, and abuse in the IP CTS 

program. 

On June 30, 2022, the Commission 

issued Telecommunications Relay 

Services and Speech-to-Speech Services 

for Individuals with Hearing and Speech 

Disabilities; Structure and Practices of 

the Video Relay Service Program; 

Misuse of internet Protocol Captioned 

Telephone Service, CG Docket Nos. 03– 

123, 10–51, and 13–24, Report and 

Order, published at 87 FR 57645, 

September 21, 2022 (Registration Grace 

Period Order), allowing IP CTS and 

Video Relay Service (VRS) providers to 

provide compensable service to a new 

user for up to two weeks after 

submitting the user’s information to the 

Database if the user’s identity is verified 

within that period, in order to offer 

more efficient service to IP CTS and 

VRS users without risk of waste, fraud, 

and abuse to the Fund. 

On September 30, 2022, the 

Commission released the Accessible 

Carceral Communications Order, Rates 

for Interstate Inmate Calling Services, 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2023 / Notices 57459 

WC Docket No.12–375, Fourth Report 

and Order, published at 87 FR 75496, 

December, 9, 2022, (Accessible Carceral 

Communications Order), requiring 

inmate calling services providers to 

provide incarcerated TRS-eligible users 

the ability to access any relay service 

eligible for TRS Fund support. To 

facilitate the registration of IP CTS users 

in carceral facilities, the Commission 

amended the registration and 

verification requirements for individual 

users. The programmatic changes in 

information collection burdens that 

apply to VRS and IP Relay due to the 

Accessible Carceral Communications 

Order are addressed separately in 

modifications to information collection 

No. 3060–1089. 

This notice and request for comments 

pertains to the programmatic changes in 

information collection burdens that 

apply to IP CTS due to the Accessible 

Carceral Communications Order. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene Dortch, 

Secretary, Office of the Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2023–18092 Filed 8–22–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION 

[Docket No. FMC–2023–0017] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: 60-Day Public Comment 

Request 

AGENCY: Federal Maritime Commission. 

ACTION: Sixty-day notice; request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Maritime 

Commission (Commission) invites 

comments on the information collection 

related to ocean common carrier and 

marine terminal operator agreements 

subject to the Shipping Act of 1984 as 

part of our continuing effort to reduce 

paperwork and respondent burden 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995. This notice announces a 

renewal of an existing collection and 

includes an update to FMC–150. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

submitted on or before October 23, 

2023. 

ADDRESSES: The Commission will 

collect comments on this notice through 

the Federal eRulemaking Portal at 

www.regulations.gov. A copy of the 

notice and supporting materials can be 

found at https://www.regulations.gov/ 

under Docket No. FMC–2023–0017. The 

FMC will summarize any comments 

received in response to this notice in a 

subsequent notice and include them in 

its information collection submission to 

OMB for approval. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

William Cody, Secretary; Phone: (202) 

523–5725; Email: mailto:secretary@

fmc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Request for Comments 

As part of its continuing effort to 

reduce paperwork and respondent 

burden, the Commission invites the 

general public and other Federal 

agencies to comment on the continuing 

information collection listed in this 

notice, as required by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 

et seq.). 

Comments submitted in response to 

this notice will be included or 

summarized in our request for Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) 

approval of the relevant information 

collection. All comments are part of the 

public record and subject to disclosure. 

Please do not include any confidential 

or inappropriate material in your 

comments. We invite comments on: (1) 

the necessity and utility of the proposed 

information collection for the proper 

performance of the agency’s functions; 

(2) the accuracy of the estimated 

burden; (3) ways to enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected; and (4) the use of 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology to 

minimize the information collection 

burden. 

Information Collection Open for 

Comment 

Title: 46 CFR 535—Ocean Common 

Carrier and Marine Terminal Operator 

Agreements Subject to the Shipping Act 

of 1984. 

OMB Approval Number: 3072–0045 

(Expires August 31, 2023). 

Abstract: Section 4 of the Shipping 

Act of 1984, 46 U.S.C. 40301 (a)–(c), 

identifies certain agreements by or 

among ocean common carriers (carriers) 

and marine terminal operators (MTOs) 

that fall within the jurisdiction of that 

Act. Section 5 of the Act, 46 U.S.C. 

40302, requires that carriers and MTOs 

file those agreements with the Federal 

Maritime Commission. Section 6 of the 

Act, 46 U.S.C. 40304, 40306, and 41307 

(b)–(d), specifies the Commission 

actions that may be taken with respect 

to filed agreements, including requiring 

the submission of additional 

information. Section 15 of the Act, 46 

U.S.C. 40104, authorizes the 

Commission to require that carriers and 

MTOs, among other persons, file 

periodic or special reports. Requests for 

additional information and the filing of 

periodic or special reports are meant to 

assist the Commission in fulfilling its 

statutory mandate of overseeing the 

activities of the ocean transportation 

industry. These reports are necessary so 

that the Commission can monitor 

agreement parties’ activities to 

determine how or if their activities will 

have an impact on competition. 

This update includes a revised FMC– 

150 form, which is collected upon 

agreement filing for a subset of 

agreements under 46 CFR part 535. The 

Commission intends that filers will have 

a choice between using the existing 

FMC–150 or the revised FMC–150 

pending any other changes in Part 535 

through rulemaking. This update also 

includes an increase in the number of 

responses received. The total estimated 

burden hours has decreased. 

Current Actions: Revision of Form 

150. 

Type of Review: Extension. 

Needs and Uses: The Commission 

uses the information filed by agreement 

parties to monitor their activities as 

required by the Shipping Act. Under 46 

U.S.C. 41307, the Commission must 

determine whether an agreement will 

have, or has resulted in, a substantial 

reduction in competition within the 

prevailing market leading to an 

unreasonable reduction in 

transportation service or an 

unreasonable increase in transportation 

costs ‘‘or to substantially lessen 

competition in the purchasing of certain 

covered services.’’ In such cases, the 

Commission would take action to seek 

to enjoin the agreement in the U.S. 

District Court for the District of 

Columbia. 

Frequency: This information will be 

collected as required by the regulations 

at Part 535. 

Type of Respondents: The types of 

respondents are marine terminal 

operators, vessel-operating common 

carriers, and other parties to FMC-filed 

agreements. 

Number of Annual Respondents: The 

2019 notice stated that the number of 

respondents was 334. This number 

erroneously counted the number of 

VOCCs and MTOs as the number of 

respondents. The adjusted number 

accounts for the number of filings of 

agreements and monitoring information, 

as well as those subject to 

recordkeeping, under the regulations at 

Part 535. Some MTOs and VOCCs are 

not required to submit any information, 

some are subject only to the 

recordkeeping, and a relatively small 

subset are parties to multiple 

agreements and therefore file multiple 

types of information under this 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1