alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 551.64 What if designation documents submitted by a foreign manufacturer do not comply with this subpart?

Designations of agent are binding on the foreign manufacturer even when their form and contents do not comply with this subpart, unless rejected by the agency.
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATI ONA L VEHICLE A ND FUEL EMI SSIONS L AB OR AT ORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROA D AN N AR BOR, MI 48105 - 2498 OFFI CE OF AI R A ND RA DIATI ON February 10, 2014 MEMORANDUM FROM: Kenneth Davidson

Asses sment and Standards Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality TO: Docket EPA - HQ - OAR

– 2011

– 0135 SUBJECT: BenMAP Air Quality Modeling Data Files for Estimation of Benefits for the Final Tier 3 Rulemaking The purpose of this memorandum is to tr ansmit BenMAP air quality modeling data input and configuration files used for the e stimation of PM and ozone - related benefits associated with the Tier 3 FRM. When used as input files to the publicly - available Environmental Benefits Mapping and Anal ys is P rogram (BenMAP), 1 a user will be able to replicate the benefits analy sis results presented in the RIA for this rulemaking. The summary files are as follows: File 1: Tier3_CMAQ_Output_Files.zip  12km ambient PM and ozone air quality CMAQ output data (base line and control for 2018 and 2030) File 2: Tier 3_AirQualityGridFiles_BenMAP.zip  12km ambient PM and ozone air quality grid input data for BenMAP (baseline and control .aqg files for 2018 and 2030), including control files where California - related air qu ality changes in the control scenario have been held constant to levels in the baseline scenario

1 BenMAP v. 4.0 is compatible w ith these files and can be downloaded at http://www.epa.gov/air/benmap/download.htmlFile 3: Tier 3_AirQualityConfigurationFiles_BenMAP.zip

 PM and ozone health effects configuration file for BenMAP (.cfg files)  PM and ozone health effects a ggregation, pooling, and valuation file for BenMAP (.apv files) File 4: BenMapUS.exe  BenMAP executable for version 4.0.65 used to estimate health impacts for the final rulemaking analy sis The benefits anal ys is is discussed in Section VIII of the preambl e and Chapter 8 of the Regulatory

Impact Analysis.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 182 (Thursday, September 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 53755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4687]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m. Friday, October 19, 2007.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person For More Information: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-4687 Filed 9-18-07; 10:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Initial Review Group, Health Services and Behavioral Research Review Subcommittee.                    

*Date:*                         October 24-25, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Doubletree Hotel, Executive Meeting Center—Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Lorraine Gunzerath, PhD, MBA, Scientific Review Administrator, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Office of Extramural Activities, Extramural Project Review Branch, 5635 Fishers lane, Room 3043, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, 301-443-2369,                         *Igunzera@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Awards for Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS). 

Dated: September 7, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 07-4570  Filed 9-14-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 569.5 Applicability. ( a ) *General.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this part applies to all motor vehicle regrooved or regroovable tires manufactured or regrooved after the effective date of the regulation.
( b ) *Export.* This part does not apply to regrooved or regroovable tires intended solely for export and so labeled or tagged.
[34 FR 1150, Jan. 24, 1969. Redesignated at 35 FR 5118, Mar. 26, 1970]
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.377 Who decides whether to issue a PIE? ( a ) The ODAPC Director, or his or her designee, decides whether to issue a PIE. If a designee is acting as the decisionmaker, all references in this subpart to the Director refer to the designee.
( b ) To ensure his or her impartiality, the Director plays no role in the initiating official's determination about whether to start a PIE proceeding.
( c ) There is a “firewall” between the initiating official and the Director. This means that the initiating official and the Director are prohibited from having any discussion, contact, or exchange of information with one another about the matter, except for documents and discussions that are part of the record of the proceeding.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Business and Economy    >Retail - Monthly    >Get Forms    >Advance Monthly Retail Trade Survey Forms
 Skip to looking for section Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  Advance Monthly Retail Trade Survey - Forms and Letters
  Current Forms and Reporting Correspondence
  SM-4417A-A Form
 SM-4417A-E Form
 SM-4417AE-A Form
 SM-4417AE-E Form
 SM-4417AS-A Form
 SM-4417AS-E Form
 SM-7217A-A Form
 SM-7217A-E Form
 Initial Mailing Letter
  Historical Forms - 2012
  SM-4412A-A Form
 SM-4412A-E Form
 SM-4412AE-A Form
 SM-4412AE-E Form
 SM-4412AS-A Form
 SM-4412AS-E Form
 SM-7212A-A Form
 SM-7212A-E Form
  Historical Forms - 2006
  SM-4406A Form
 SM-4406AE Form
 SM-4406AS Form
 SM-7206A Form
 Last Revised: June 10, 2020


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
From: Elise Astleford [mailto:eliseast@gmail.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 12:04 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN1210-AB32

Mr. Perez,

Some years ago I was with a broker at Merrill Lynch and left in dissatisfaction because of poor 

choices he had urged me to make. Later I learned that he was pushing what ML urged on its 

brokers! It was not in my best interest and I lost funds because of it. I admit that I am not as well 

educated or informed as I needed to be, but I thought he had my best interests in mind. I do urge 

passage of the change the Obama administration is advocating for.

Thank you.

Elise L. Astleford

Vancouver, WA
###### Editorial Note on Part 393

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 393 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 393.92 [Reserved]
#### § 563.1 Scope.

This part specifies uniform, national requirements for vehicles equipped with event data recorders (EDRs) concerning the collection, storage, and retrievability of onboard motor vehicle crash event data. It also specifies requirements for vehicle manufacturers to make tools and/or methods commercially available so that crash investigators and researchers are able to retrieve data from EDRs.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 312 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     December 12, 2001.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2883) to authorize 
appropriations for fiscal year 2002 for intelligence and intelligence-related 
activities of the United States Government, the Community Management Account, 
and the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System, and for 
other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and against 
its consideration are waived.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
§ 33.63 Memoranda of Understanding. ( a ) A Memorandum of Understanding is an official action that may be issued in resolving special priorities assistance cases to reflect an agreement reached by all parties (the Department of Transportation, the Department of Commerce (if applicable), a Delegate Agency (if applicable), the supplier, and the customer).
( b ) A Memorandum of Understanding is not used to alter scheduling between rated orders, authorize the use of priority ratings, impose restrictions under this part, or take other official actions. Rather, Memoranda of Understanding are used to confirm production or shipping schedules that do not require modifications to other rated orders.
§ 554.7 Investigation priorities. ( a ) Compliance investigation priorities are reviewed annually and are set according to the following criteria: ( 1 ) Prior compliance test data;
( 2 ) Accident data;
( 3 ) Engineering analysis of vehicle and equipment designs;
( 4 ) Consumer complaints; and
( 5 ) Market share.
( b ) Defects inputs are reviewed periodically by an appropriate panel of engineers in consultation with the Office of Chief Counsel to determine whether a formal investigation should be opened by the Office of Defects Investigation.
§ 372.223 Consolidated governments. The zone adjacent to, and commercially a part of a consolidated government within which transportation by motor vehicle, in interstate or foreign commerce, not under common control, management, or arrangement for a continuous carriage or shipment to or from a point beyond the zone, is partially exempt from regulation under 49 U.S.C. 13506(b)(1) includes and is comprised of all points as follows: ( a ) All points within the boundaries of the consolidated government.
( b ) All points beyond the boundaries of the consolidated government which were at any time within the commercial zone of the formerly independent core municipality.
( c ) When the present population of the formerly independent core municipality is identifiable, all points beyond the boundaries of the consolidated government which are within the territory determined by the most recent population-mileage formula measured from the limits of the formerly independent core municipality.
( d ) All of any municipality wholly surrounded, or so surrounded except for a water boundary, by the consolidated government or by any other municipality included under the terms of paragraphs (a), (b), or (c) of this section.
[41 FR 56654, Dec. 29, 1976, as amended at 62 FR 15422, Apr. 1, 1997]
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Colleen B. BrownColleen B. Brown.President and Chief Executive Officer
1210-AB32-2-1624.html[7/26/2015 9:11:09 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jxy-u2te

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2121

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I can take care of my own retirement
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1461.html[7/23/2015 11:19:32 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvo-b2nt

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1461

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: KURT lawrence

General Comment

It is my money let me decide how and where to spend it.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

DEAN ARLO ARP, et al., ) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

THE FEDERAL RESERVE, et al., ) Civil Case No. 10-00005 (RJL) 

) 

Defendants. ) 

) 

) 

1'1--

MEMORANDUM ORDER 

(April~, 2010) [#5] 

Plaintiffs, Dean Arlo Arp, Wanda Elene Arp, Teresa Feller, Shirsha Sumeru, and 

Charles C. Miller, brought this action against defendants, the Federal Reserve and its 

twelve district presidents, claiming to be "relators" for the people of the State of 

Washington. The plaintiffs appear to seek an audit, to be published on the internet, to 

disclose the "complete mechanisms applied to use and application of our equity wherein 

the values created from said equity the benefits of said equity are fully and completely 

disclosed"; a protective order to give each plaintiff immunity from "process issued by 

any agency of the United States which operates off and from the private money system 

administered by the defendants"; and an injunction against all foreclosures in the United 

States. (CompI. l3.) Presently before the Court is defendants' Motion to Dismiss for 

lack of personal jurisdiction, failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, 
and lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS 

defendants' Motion to Dismiss. 

Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7 (b) provides that an opposing party has 14 days to 

file a memorandum in opposition to a motion and if such party fails to do so, the court 

may treat the motion as conceded. LCvR 7(b). This rule is a "docket-management tool 

that facilitates efficient and effective resolution of motions by requiring the prompt 

joining of issues." Fox v. American Airlines, Inc., 389 F.3d 1291, 1294 (D.C. Cir. 2004). 

In Fox, the D.C. Circuit affirmed the District Court's holding that "because the plaintiffs 

failed to respond to the defendant's ... motion, the court treats the motion as conceded 

and grants the motion." Id. (citations omitted). Whether to treat a motion as conceded 

under Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7(b) is highly discretionary; and our Circuit Court 

has noted that "[ w ]here the district court relies on the absence of a response as a basis for 

treating the motion as conceded, [the D.C. Circuit will] honor its enforcement of the 

rule." Twelve John Does v. District a/Columbia, 117 F.3d 571,577 (D.C. Cir. 1997). 

In light of the fact that plaintiffs failed to file any opposition to defendants' 

Motion to Dismiss, even when the Court issued an Order requiring the plaintiff to do so 

or face the consequences of the motions being treated as conceded, (see Dkt. # 10), the 

Court will treat these motions as conceded. LCvR 7(b). Therefore, in light of the 

plaintiffs concession and based on a review of the pleadings, the relevant law cited 

therein, and the record, it is hereby 

2 
ORDERED that [#5] defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; and it is 

further 

ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of defendants and the Complaint is 

dismissed with prejudice. 

SO ORDERED. 

RICHA 1. \ EON 

United States District Judge 

3
1210-AB32-2-1605.html[7/26/2015 8:53:23 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jxx-oigd

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2102

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I can handle my own retirement account without any need for government intervention
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-11325

Summary Calendar 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee 

v. 

RUDY GARCIA, 

Defendant-Appellant 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas 

USDC No. 5:16-CR-11-1 

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rudy Garcia has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Garcia has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed 

to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Garcia’s claim of ineffective assistance 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 28, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-11325 Document: 00513928778 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/28/2017
No. 16-11325

2 

of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to 

collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Garcia’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review

and dispense with further briefing. However, the district court’s written 

judgment fails to reflect the dismissal of counts two, three, and four of the 

indictment. These counts were dismissed by the district court on the 

Government’s motion. Additionally, the written judgment incorrectly states 

that the offense of conviction involved “amphetamine” when in fact the offense 

involved “methamphetamine.” A remand to correct such clerical errors is 

proper. See FED. R. CRIM. P. 36.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, 

Garcia’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED, and the case is REMANDED 

to the district court with the instructions to correct the judgment to reflect the 

dismissal of counts two, three, and four of the indictment and to replace 

“amphetamine” with “methamphetamine.” Garcia’s motion for appointment of 

counsel is DENIED. 

 Case: 16-11325 Document: 00513928778 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/28/2017
# Sept. 30: U.S. Military, Partner Nations Conduct Airstrikes Against ISIL in Syria, Iraq

/ Published Sept. 30, 2014

	September 30, 2014

	Release # 20140939	FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla., Sept. 30, 2014 -** U.S. military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria Monday and today using a mix of attack, fighter and remotely piloted aircraft to conduct 11 airstrikes. Separately, U.S. military forces used attack, fighter and remotely piloted aircraft today to conduct 11 airstrikes in Iraq.

	In Syria, two airstrikes near Dayr ar Zawr destroyed an ISIL armored vehicle and an ISIL armed vehicle. Five strikes in northeast Syria near Sinjar destroyed one ISIL artillery piece, one ISIL tank, three ISIL armed vehicles, two ISIL facilities, an ISIL observation post and struck four ISIL fighting positions.  Three strikes near Mazra al Duwud near the Syrian/Turkish border, destroyed one ISIL artillery piece, damaged another, and destroyed two ISIL rocket launchers. One strike northeast of Aleppo destroyed four ISIL-occupied buildings. All aircraft departed the strike areas safely.

	In Iraq, seven airstrikes in northwest Iraq destroyed one ISIL armored vehicle, two ISIL transport vehicles, and four ISIL armed vehicles and damaged one.  In the vicinity of Mosul Dam, two airstrikes destroyed an ISIL fighting position and an ISIL armed vehicle. Northwest of Baghdad, one airstrike destroyed an ISIL armed vehicle while another strike in west Fallujah struck an ISIL checkpoint. All aircraft departed the strike areas safely.

	The strikes were conducted as part of the President's comprehensive strategy to degrade and destroy ISIL.  The destruction and degradation of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group's ability to lead, control, project power and conduct operations.