alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 572
Editorial Notes: 1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 572.154 Thorax assembly and test procedure. ( a ) Thorax Assembly (refer to § 572.150(a)(1)(iv)) . The thorax consists of the part of the torso assembly shown in drawing 921022-060.
( b ) When the thorax of a completely assembled dummy (drawing 921022-000) is impacted by a test probe conforming to § 572.155(a) at 5.0 ±0.1m/s (16.5 ±0.3 ft/s) according to the test procedure in paragraph (c) of this section, the peak force, measured by the impact probe in accordance with paragraph § 572.155(a), shall be not less than 1514 N (340.7 lbf) and not more than 1796 N (404.1 lbf).
( c ) *Test procedure.* ( 1 ) Soak the dummy in a controlled environment at any temperature between 20.6 and 22.2 °C (69 and 72 °F) and at any relative humidity between 10 and 70 percent for at least four hours prior to a test. These temperature and humidity levels shall be maintained throughout the entire testing period specified in this section.
( 2 ) The test dummy is clothed in a cotton-polyester based tight fitting sweat shirt with long sleeves and ankle long pants whose combined weight is not more than 0.25 kg (.55 lbs).
( 3 ) Seat and orient the dummy on a level seating surface without back support as shown in Figure R5 of this subpart, with the lower limbs extended forward, parallel to the midsagittal plane and the arms 0 to 5 degrees forward of vertical. The dummy's midsagittal plane is vertical within ±/1 degree and the posterior surface of the upper spine box is aligned at 90 ±/1 degrees from the horizontal. (Shim material may be used under the upper legs to maintain the dummy's specified spine box surface alignment).
( 4 ) Establish the impact point at the chest midsagittal plane so that the impact point of the longitudinal centerline of the probe coincides with the dummy's midsagittal plane, is centered on the torso 196 ±/2.5 mm (7.7 ±/0.1 in) vertically from the plane of the seating surface, and is within 0.5 degrees of a horizontal plane.
( 5 ) Impact the thorax with the test probe so that at the moment of contact the probe's longitudinal center line falls within 2 degrees of a horizontal line in the dummy's midsagittal plane.
( 6 ) Guide the test probe during impact so that there is no significant lateral, vertical or rotational movement.
( 7 ) No suspension hardware, suspension cables, or any other attachments to the probe, including the velocity vane, shall make contact with the dummy during the test.
[65 FR 17188, Mar. 31, 2000, as amended at 66 FR 45784, Aug. 30, 2001]
#### The Board of Supervisors of Tompkins County, *Respondent, v.*George H. Bristol and others, Appellants.—

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion

by Potter, J.
----

|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2.  |  The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ William Salek            |   |
|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|   |                         |   |
| Name:  | William Salek                |   |
|   |                         |   |
|   | Chief      Financial Officer |   |
|   |                         |   |
| Date:  | March      27, 2009          |   |

----
```

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1
                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I,  Donald  Lynn  Collins,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer  of Collins
Industries,  Inc.,  certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Annual  Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended  October
31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  July 29, 2005

                                By
                                                  /s/ Donald Lynn Collins
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Donald Lynn Collins, President
                                                  and Chief Executive Officer
```
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.273 What is the effect of a cancelled alcohol test? ( a ) A cancelled alcohol test is neither positive nor negative. ( 1 ) As an employer, you must not attach to a cancelled test the consequences of a test result that is 0.02 or greater (*e.g.,* removal from a safety-sensitive position).
( 2 ) As an employer, you must not use a cancelled test in a situation where an employee needs a test result that is below 0.02 (*e.g.,* in the case of a return-to-duty or follow-up test to authorize the employee to perform safety-sensitive functions).
( 3 ) As an employer, you must not direct a recollection for an employee because a test has been cancelled, except in the situations cited in paragraph (a)(2) of this section or other provisions of this part.
( b ) A cancelled test does not count toward compliance with DOT requirements, such as a minimum random testing rate.
( c ) When a test must be cancelled, if you are the BAT, STT, or other person who determines that the cancellation is necessary, you must inform the affected DER within 48 hours of the cancellation.
( d ) A cancelled DOT test does not provide a valid basis for an employer to conduct a non-DOT test (*i.e.,* a test under company authority).
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 9, 2021

No. 04-21-00277-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.C.L.V, A CHILD

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-PA-01657

Kimberly Burley, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On July 9, 2021, appellants filed a notice of appeal stating their intent to appeal a final 

decree of termination signed on June 10, 2021. The clerk’s record was filed on July 26, 2021. 

Although the clerk’s record contains the judge’s notes, the clerk’s record does not contain an 

order terminating appellant’s parental rights. See In re L.H., No. 04-13-00174-CV, 2013 WL 

3804585, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio July 17, 2013, no pet.) (noting judge’s notes do not 

constitute a final order) (mem. op.). In response to this court’s inquiry, the trial court clerk 

confirmed the trial court has not received a final order. “[A]n appeal may be prosecuted only 

from a final judgment.” N.E. Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Aldridge, 400 S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex. 1966). 

Because no final order has been entered in the underlying case, appellants are ORDERED to 

show cause in writing within ten days from the date of this order why this appeal should not be 

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of August, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
<PAGE>
 
                                                      Exhibit (21)-1
                                                      Unicom Corporation
                                                      Form 10-K File No. 1-11375



                              Unicom Corporation
                          Subsidiaries of the Company
                          ---------------------------

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 

                                                                      State or
                                                                    Jurisdiction
                                                                      in Which
                    Name                                            Incorporated
------------------------------------------------                    ------------
<S>                                                                 <C> 
Commonwealth Edison Company                                         Illinois
  Commonwealth Edison Company of Indiana, Inc.                      Indiana
  ComEd Financing I                                                 Delaware
  ComEd Financing II                                                Delaware
  Commonwealth Research Corporation                                 Illinois
  Concomber, Ltd.                                                   Bermuda
  Cotter Corporation                                                New Mexico
  Edison Development Company                                        Delaware
  Edison Development Canada Inc.                                    Canada
Unicom Enterprises Inc.                                             Illinois
  Unicom Thermal Technologies Inc.                                  Illinois
  Unicom Thermal Technologies Boston Inc.                           Delaware
  Unicom Thermal Technologies North America Inc.                    Delaware
  Unicom Technology Development Inc.                                Illinois
Unicom Resources Inc.                                               Illinois
</TABLE>
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM'S  CONSENT

	We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-42543 dated August 30, 1991) pertaining to
the Cognitronics Corporation 1967 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the
Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-42544 dated August 30, 1991
and Form S-8 No. 333-05897 dated June 13, 1996) pertaining to the
Cognitronics Corporation 1990 Stock Option Plan, the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-05899 dated June 13, 1996) pertaining
to the Cognitronics Corporation Restricted Stock Plan and the
Registration Statement (FormS-8 No. 333-118508 dated August 24,
2004) pertaining to the Directors' Stock Option Plan of our report
dated March 24, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Cognitronics Corporation included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.


/s/Carlin, Charron & Rosen, LLP

Glastonbury, Connecticut
March 31, 2006
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Larry W. Sayre, Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Collins Industries, Inc., certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended October 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of 
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: | January 15, 2003 |                                          
|------ | ---------------- | -----------------------------------------
|       |                  |                                          
|       | By               |                                          
|       |                  | /s/ Larry W. Sayre                       
|       |                  | Larry W. Sayre, Vice President of Finance
|       |                  | and Chief Financial Officer
November 25, 2015

Mr. Larry J. Gregory

President

Lone Star Flight Museum

P.O. Box 3099

2002 Terminal Dr.

Galveston, TX 77552

Dear Mr. Gregory :

We have received your September 29

, 2015 corres pondence withdrawing your November 25

, 2014 petition on behalf of Lone Star Fl ight Museum for an exemption from §§ 91.315,

119.5(g)

, and 119.21(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

Your letter has been placed in the p ublic docket (No. FAA

- 2006

- 25434)

. No further action

will be taken on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

James M . Crotty

Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division
§ 551.56 What information must an Acceptance by Agent contain? An Acceptance by Agent must contain: ( a ) The full legal name, mailing address and telephone number of the agent;
( b ) A statement that the agent accepts the designation and understands that (s)he may not assign performance of the agent's functions under the designation to another person or entity, and that the designation shall remain in effect until it is withdrawn or replaced by the foreign manufacturer;
( c ) The signature in ink of the agent, or an official or employee of the domestic firm or corporation serving as the agent, who must authority to sign for the firm or corporation; and
( d ) The name and title of the individual signing the acceptance.
#### D. F. Gorham, Respondent, v. Sanford H. Weeks, Jr., and another, Appellants.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.:

Dykman, J , not sitting.
Editorial Note on Part 393
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 393 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 393.130 What are the rules for securing heavy vehicles, equipment and machinery? ( a ) *Applicability.* The rules in this section apply to the transportation of heavy vehicles, equipment and machinery which operate on wheels or tracks, such as front end loaders, bulldozers, tractors, and power shovels and which individually weigh 4,536 kg (10,000 lb.) or more. Vehicles, equipment and machinery which is lighter than 4,536 kg (10,000 lb.) may also be secured in accordance with the provisions of this section, with § 393.128, or in accordance with the provisions of §§ 393.100 through 393.114.
( b ) *Preparation of equipment being transported.* ( 1 ) Accessory equipment, such as hydraulic shovels, must be completely lowered and secured to the vehicle.
( 2 ) Articulated vehicles shall be restrained in a manner that prevents articulation while in transit.
( c ) *Securement of heavy vehicles, equipment or machinery with crawler tracks or wheels.* ( 1 ) In addition to the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section, heavy equipment or machinery with crawler tracks or wheels must be restrained against movement in the lateral, forward, rearward, and vertical direction using a minimum of four tiedowns.
( 2 ) Each of the tiedowns must be affixed as close as practicable to the front and rear of the vehicle, or mounting points on the vehicle that have been specifically designed for that purpose.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Alfred P. Wright, Respondent, v. The Common Council of the City of Buffalo, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements, on opinion of Daniels, J., at Special Term.
Volunteering for a better Afghanistan: Soldiers donate time, goods to locals
 By Sgt. William Begley , RC-East PAO
  Volunteering for a better Afghanistan: Soldiers donate time, goods to locals
 BAGRAM AIRFIELD, Afghanistan (March 29, 2012) — Several Soldiers volunteered their time and energy to hand out donated goods to local Afghans at the El Salam Egyptian Theater Hospital on Bagram Airfield, March 27. The program, called Operation Care, is a volunteer organization comprised of military and civilian members serving in the Afghanistan theater of operations, said U.S. Army Capt. Kenyarda Chambers, a native of Alexandria, La., and Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 11th Theatre Tactical Signal Brigade, Task Force Signal commander. Chambers is Operation Care president in Afghanistan and added the program is dedicated to the welfare of the people of Afghanistan and Coalition Forces located on remote Forward Operating Bases who don’t receive care packages on a regular basis. The volunteers distributed bags of clothing and various personal hygiene products along with snacks and toys for the children. U.S. Army Maj. Debra Doolittle of Milwaukee, 82nd Combat Aviation Brigade, Task Force Poseidon information technology officer, enjoys volunteering. She helped the other volunteers to fill the bags of clothing and goods the night before the operation. “This gives the local nationals another viewpoint of Coalition Forces,” said Doolittle. “This is one of those good news stories that you don’t hear about. We’re doing good things here and showing the locals that we’re good people. We are providing for those that don’t have because we care.” U.S. Army 1st Sgt. Herbert Duvernay of San Jose, Calif., HHC, 11th TTSB, TF Signal, highly recommends that servicemembers volunteer for causes like Operation Care. “It’s my job to make sure that my Soldiers are mentally, physically and spiritually fit,” Duvernay said. “We’re trying to do something positive in this world. We try to spread the good. It has a positive effect.” Some servicemembers who are deployed have free time that they need to fill. Most agree time goes by faster when they stay busy. Little things like volunteering help pass the time and make them feel great while doing it. That’s one of the reasons why U.S. Army Spc. Alexandra Kaaihue, an administrative clerk with the 11th TTSB, TF Signal, is a volunteer. It helps her keep things in perspective. “It feels awesome to share what we take for granted as Americans,” said Kaaihue, who hails from Mannheim, Germany.  “Some of these people don’t even have shoes. We have so much that we take for granted daily that it makes me feel like I’m giving something back if just one of these families can use what’s in these bags.”
1210-AB32-2-1540.html[7/26/2015 7:10:23 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 11, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwz-8puw

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2037

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Jerry Lambert

General Comment

As your constituent, the financial future of my family is deeply important. I have become increasingly concerned

 that the Department of Labors (DOL) proposed retirement rule will limit my options when it comes to saving for

 retirement. I am also concerned the proposal may unnecessarily raise costs for me to receive in-person help with

 my IRA.

We all agree that Americans should be doing more to save for retirement and financial professionals who provide

 savings help should be acting in the best interests of those they serve. However, I have serious concerns about

 the impact the DOLs proposal will have on retirement savers like me, whether they are in an IRA or a 401(k).

 The effect of the DOLs 700-page proposal is that Americans could be forced to pay high fees for hourly or feebased services they dont want or need, or, even worse, left without advice to fend for themselves online. Experts

 believe this will make our retirement savings crisis worse. Without access to affordable in-person guidance,

 middle-income Americans will miss out on the financial education they need and will save less for retirement.

The DOLs long list of complex restrictions and requirements may effectively prevent me from choosing what fits

 my needs. Why should I be forced into more expensive plans or have to accept less access to financial guidance

 because of a government regulation?

At a time when saving for retirement is so difficult, I cannot afford rules that create new obstacles to achieving

 my retirement goals. The DOL has gone beyond clients best interests in a way that constrains choice, raises

 costs, and puts my financial well-being at risk. Instead, Congress should intervene with the DOL to protect my

 choice of retirement products and services at the price I want to pay.

As your constituent, I urge you to support legislation that protects IRAs and my retirement choices from the

 DOL rule.
March 26: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL in Syria and Iraq
 By CJTF - Operation Inherent Resolve News Release
  March 26, 2015 Release # 20150326.2FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **SOUTHWEST ASIA –** On March 25, Coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria, using fighter, attack and bomber aircraft to conduct five airstrikes. Separately in Iraq, Coalition military forces conducted 24 airstrikes approved by the Iraqi Ministry of Defense, using fighter, bomber and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL terrorists. All strikes took place between 8 a.m., March 25, and 8 a.m., March 26, local time. The following is a summary of the strikes conducted since the last press release: **Syria** Near Ar Raqqah, an airstrike struck an ISIL military garrison. Near Kobani, four airstrikes struck two ISIL tactical units, five ISIL fighting positions and destroyed two ISIL fighting positions.  Iraq Near Bayji, an airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit. Near Fallujah, three airstrikes struck three ISIL tactical units and two ISIL fighting positions. Near Mosul, two airstrikes struck an ISIL checkpoint and an ISIL staging area. Near Tal Afar, an airstrike struck an ISIL fighting position. Near Tikrit, 17 airstrikes struck multiple ISIL buildings, two ISIL bridges, three ISIL checkpoints, two ISIL staging areas, two ISIL berms, an ISIL roadblock and an ISIL command and control facility.  The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria, the region, and the wider international community. The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Iraq include Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, Netherlands, United Kingdom and U.S. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Syria include Bahrain, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and U.S. Click HERE to watch Tikrit airstrike videos.