alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Joel Jockton Beavers, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Keith Watters et al., 

Defendants. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

FILED 

AUG 1 0 2010 

Clark. U.S. District & Bankruptcy 

Courts for the DiStrict of ColumbIa 

10 1343 

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff s pro se complaint and application to proceed 

in forma pauperis. The Court will grant plaintiffs application and dismiss the complaint on the 

ground of res judicata. 

Under the principle of res judicata, a final judgment on the merits in one action "bars any 

further claim based on the same 'nucleus of facts' .... " Page v. United States, 729 F.2d 818, 

820 (D.C. Cir. 1984) (quoting Expert Elec., Inc. v. Levine, 554 F.2d 1227, 1234 (D.C. Cir. 

1977)). Res judicata bars the relitigation "of issues that were or could have been raised in [the 

prior] action." Drake v. FAA, 291 F.3d 59 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (emphasis in original) (quoting Allen 

v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90, 94 (1980)); see IA.M Nat 'I Pension Fund v. Indus. Gear Mfg. Co., 

723 F.2d 944,949 (D.C. Cir. 1983) (noting that res judicata "forecloses all that which might 

have been litigated previously"). Moreover, res judicata applies to dismissals for lack of 

jurisdiction. SeeGAFCorp. v. u.s., 818F.2d901,912(D.C.Cir.1987)(explainingthat"[t]he 

judgment ordering dismissal [has] preclusive effect as to matters actually adjudicated [,e.g.,] the 
precise issue of jurisdiction that led to the initial dismissal); accord Dozier v. Ford Motor Co., 

702 F.2d 1189,1191-92 (D.C. Cir. 1983). 

This is the third time that plaintiff has filed this action, over which the Court recently 

determined it lacked subject matter jurisdiction. See Beavers v. Watters, Civ. Action No.1 0-

1120 (D.D.C., June 30, 2010). Because the current complaint does not cure the jurisdictional 

defect, it, too, will be dismissed. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. 

v ~ ~-rIJ1C--c:I -'. 

Date: August~, 2010 

United States District Judge 

2
From: Jason Coleman

To: Kordzi, Joe

Subject: RE: Water well data request

Date: Monday, August 10, 2015 11:22:04 AM

Attachments: Records request form.pdf

Joe:  The well permits, well logs, and water level changes are available here.  The layers for each data

source are selectable at the top of the map.  The pumping data is the one item in your list that is not

available online, so I have attached an information request form.  Please complete the form and

return at your convenience.

Regards

Jason

From: Kordzi, Joe [mailto:Kordzi.Joe@epa.gov]

Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 11:03 AM

To: Jason Coleman <jason.coleman@hpwd.com>

Subject: Water well data request

Hi Jason,

We just spoke on the phone.  Basically, I’d appreciate getting the following information concerning

water well usage in and around the Tolk and Plant X facilities and farms/ranches within a reasonable

area around those facilities:

· A map that indicates the locations and coordinates of water wells that pump from the

Ogallala or other aquifers.  Small users like individual residences can be ignored.

· Historical water pumping data for the last 10 years. 

· Water well permits for the same.

I’d appreciate getting this information ASAP, as we are working under a court ordered consent

decree to finalize our action.  Thanks.

Joe Kordzi

EPA Region 6

" . . . and miles to go before I sleep."

 - Robert Frost
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SEVENTH DISTRICT, AT AMARILLO

No. 07-14-00312-CV

Tom Norman

v.

Ann Crouch and Omni Capital Corporation d/b/a South Georgia Shopping Center

(No. 63550-A IN 47TH DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY)

Type of Fee Charges Paid By

Reporter's record

Indigent

Supreme Court chapter 51 fee

Filing

Statewide efiling fee

$2,892.00

$25.00

$50.00

$100.00

$20.00

UNKNOWN

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

47th District Court

Tom Norman

Tom Norman

Tom Norman

Tom Norman

Balance of costs owing to the Seventh Court of Appeals, Amarillo, Texas: $0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per

the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, VIVIAN LONG, CLERK OF THE SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE

STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of

the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS,

showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears

of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand

and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for the

Seventh District of Texas on September 24, 2015.

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY
Afghan commandos take flight in Shinwar district
 By Sgt. Jenie Fisher , Combined Joint Special Operations Task Force
  Commandos from the 1st Special Operations Kandak board helicopters for their first-ever independently planned, prepared and executed unilateral mission with the Mi-17 helicopters, Kabul province, July 25. (Photo by Petty Officer 3rd Class Joshua Davies)
 NANGARHAR PROVINCE, Afghanistan (August 7, 2012) — Members of  the 3rd Company, 1st Commando Kandak cleared an insurgent safe haven with the  help of four of their own helicopters in Shinwar district, July 25. During the mission, commandos used four Afghan Mi-17 helicopters to increase speed and efficiency of the operation. This is the first time Afghanistan has used its own dedicated special operations air assets to infiltrate an area and conduct a mission without U.S. forces on the ground. “The commandos are motivated and have proven time and again that they can conduct these missions as a single entity,” said Lt. Col. William Linn, Special Operations Task Force East commander. “The implementation of their air assets demonstrates the great strides they’ve made in reaching the level of proficiency needed to suppress insurgent activities throughout Afghanistan.” Linn also explained the area surrounding the compounds where this operation took place contained dense vegetation, along with terraced farm lands. The Mi-17, while large enough to hold more than an entire commando platoon, can also navigate through such terrain with speed and efficiency. This historic mission implemented the helicopters as troop carriers, bringing the commandos to the Dagah Village, where they cleared specific areas of interest which contained a number of suspected insurgent compounds. While the use of the Mi-17s made the event unique, it’s not what made it a milestone for the 1st Commando Kandak. “This mission, and several others leading up to it, is definitive evidence that Afghan special operations forces have what it takes to unilaterally plan and execute missions without direct tactical support from the U.S.” said a special forces team leader. “The men of 1st Special Operations Kandak have planned and conducted several highly successful unilateral missions resulting in the capture of key enemy leaders with no U.S. presence during the mission. Now, they’ve included the Mi-17 and we’re merely observers.”The operation was launched to disrupt insurgents who have been running multiple narcotics processing laboratories, while threatening villagers through intimidation tactics and roadside bombs.Commandos disrupted the insurgent networks in the area and uncovered hidden military equipment used by suspected insurgents. “While the commandos take a lot of pride in their mission, the use of the Mi-17 air assets significantly elevates the force’s capability,” said Linn. “This operation was perfectly executed with absolutely no casualties or collateral damage.”
-----Original Message----- 

From: emidesu_2000@yahoo.com [mailto:emidesu_2000@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:08 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Amy Bebawi 

261 N. Linden Ave. 

Upper Darby, PA 19082
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 246 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 25, 2001.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration 
of the bill (H.R. 2586) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2002 for 
military activities of the Department of Defense, to prescribe military 
personnel strengths for fiscal year 2002, and for other purposes. No further 
amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in 
order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying 
this resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the order printed in 
the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be 
considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report 
equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be 
subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the 
question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order 
against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the 
bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House 
with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate 
vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the 
bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to 
final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
August3,2012 

Iionorabl ~ Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator 

U.S. r:nvironmental Protection Agency 

Mail Codc' 61 02T 

1200 P~nnsylvani" Av"nu~, N.W 

Wdshington, DC ~()460 

2012 AUG -1 PH 12: 51t 

Re: New Source Perf(Jrm"n~e St"nddrd for Residentidl Wood Burning Devicc, 

Dear Administrator Jackson: 

State and local air qUJlity management agencies fro)], across the country 

urge EPA to exp€ditiously promulgate an update to th€ !lew Source Performance 

Standard (NSPSJ for Residential Wood Burning Devic€s. With EP1\'S r€eent proposal 

to strengthen the nJlional ambient air quality standard for nne particulat~ matt~r, 

updating this performanc~ standard to reneet best demonstrated emission controls, 

and to broaden the standard to address dfvices that are not included in the current 

NS~S is now more important than ev('r. 

Wood is a dnm"'tic r"n~w"hle ellergy resourc e fnr home heating, alld as 

SU eh can be an irn porlanl part () f a stdle's porlfol ill (lr rcncwable cnergy allemali ve'. 

However, wilh inadequale COn Irols, wood burning cdn emi I high I eve Is of fin~ 

particulate and ail' toxies, potentially endangering pu blic Iwalth. Ov~r the 20 -plus 

yedrs since EPA prGmulgated the NSPS for Residential Wooel Burning D~vices, 

improved technologies to limit emissions from these devices have been dev€loped 

and d~monstrJted. M~ny m~nufaeturers have been building wood hemers 1.vith 

emission rJtes far b~low EPA's CU'Tent standards, and hav~ fOl'many years. 

Consistent 1Nith Section III of the Clean Air Aet, we urge EPA to mow fOlWJrd with 

a revision to th~ NSPS tha t reflects the hest syst.em of emissiol1 r!,du(:tion that has 

h~cl1 adequatdy demonstrated. MOre(lV~r, EPA should cxamin~ the testing m~lhods 

us"d to de'lermin~ rOlllpli"nu: with lhe standards, and revise the methods as 

" ppropriale dnd neces'~ry t(J ~culrat~ly d~lermine emissilln performance. Both 

strong "mis,ion, st"nd~rd.' ;<nd al13rCurat~ emissiol1s test melhod "re essential to 

the continued credibili ty of EP;\ 's wood h~ater certification program. 

In summary, an update to the NSPS for Residential Wood flu I'll i ng [)('vi cc, is 

long overdue, "nd with EPA's lalest proposal rOf a mor~ slringcnl fine parlicuiate 

standard, EP J\ has effectively acknowledged th~ public health imparts from fin€ 

parti ciliate mJlter at colleen trations far lower than th e I ~ .. el., "on(em plated in 1 <)88, 

when this 'JSPS was fir,l promulg~ted. w~ will conlinue to work wilh EPA on this 

imrorlallt efforl inlhe' corning month, knowing thaI tI,e allernative i~ fllr state and 

local agencies to und~rtake rulemaking on tileir 01Nll. faced with many of the same 
challenges that EPA faces but without EPA's resources or expertise. Accordingly, it is 

EPA's responsibility to expeditiously promulgate new performance standards for 

wood heaters that encompass the full range of wood heating devices in use today, 

and that reflect best demonstrated technologies. 

Sincerely, 

Dan Johnson 

Executive Director 

WESTAR 

Arthur Marin 

Executive Director 

NESCAUM
1210-AB32-2-1329.html[7/26/2015 1:35:58 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvx-zphp

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1825

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: E DON SURBER

General Comment

I do not want the US Goverment to set my retirement program. I am smart eneough to set my own and ave done

 so.

I HOPE SOMEONE PAYS ATTENTION TO THE PEOPLES WISHES . WY TWO MUCH GOVERNMENT

 IN THE BUSINESS OF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
INDUSTRY PARTICIPANT LIST FOR

MARCH 11, 2010 CONFERENCE CALL 

WITH EPA

Steve Aldridge, Knauf Insulation

Lauren Alterman, CertainTeed Corporation

John Bolden, USG Interiors

Chris Bullock, Rock Wool Manufacturing

Angus Crane, NAIMA

Carlos Davis, CertainTeed Corporation

Ken Gould, Owens Corning

Tom Lund, Isolatek International 

Chris Mahin, Knauf Insulation

Granta Nakayama, Kirkland & Ellis

Tom Osborn, FiberTEK Insulation

Jessie Payne, IIG

Mike Pettis, Owens Corning

Jeff Tarde, Johns Manville

Grover Thomas, Guardian Fiberglass

Brent Tracy, Johns Manville
|Exhibit 32.2                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|The undersigned officer certifies that this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

|Date: | September 20, 2005                           
|----- | ---------------------------------------------
|      |                                              
|By:   | /s/ Thomas J. Cunningham                     
|      | Thomas J. Cunningham, Chief Financial Officer
Flatwater Studios Materials Release Form

Flatwater Studios respectfully requests permission to use:

_____________________________________________________________________________________,

which will become part of the television broadcast and/or video program entitled,

_____________________________________________________________________________________,

produced by Flatwater Studios. This program will be recorded on video tape for later broadcast, as well as 

distributed on video.

Full credit would be given to:

_____________________________________________________________________________________,

at the close of the show in which this video is used.

We sincerely hope that you will grant us the permission requested, and will indicate such by signing and 

returning this form. Your prompt and courteous consideration of this request is very much appreciated.

PERMISSION GRANTED THIS DATE: ___________________________

NAME OF FIRM OR ORGANIZATION: __________________________________________________

Authorized By: ________________________________

Position: _____________________________________

Address: _____________________________________

_____________________________________________

Phone Number: ________________________________
#### Eureka Cast Steel Company, *Respondent, v.*Syracuse Chilled Plow Company, *Appellant.*

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, before another referee, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Barker, J.
§ 24.206 Eviction for cause. ( a ) Eviction for cause must conform to applicable Federal, State, and local law. Any person who occupies the real property and is in lawful occupancy on the date of the initiation of negotiations is presumed to be entitled to relocation payments and other assistance set forth in this part unless the agency determines that: ( 1 ) The person received an eviction notice prior to the initiation of negotiations and as a result of that notice is later evicted; or
( 2 ) The person is evicted after the initiation of negotiations for serious or repeated violation of material terms of the lease or occupancy agreement; and
( 3 ) In either case the eviction was not undertaken for the purpose of evading the obligation to make available the payments and other assistance set forth in this part.
( b ) For purposes of determining eligibility for relocation payments, the date of displacement is the date the person moves, or if later, the date a comparable replacement dwelling is made available. This section applies only to persons who would otherwise have been displaced by the project. (*See* appendix A to this part, section 24.206.)
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 10, 1995 (125), Para 125.14 VA Nurse Anesthetists Compensation]
[Page 1497]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.125.14  va nurse anesthetists compensation

  Mr. STUMP moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 1536) to 
amend title 38, United States Code, to extend for two years an expiring 
authority of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs with respect to 
determination of locality salaries for certain nurse anesthetist 
positions in the Department of Veterans Affairs.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LATHAM, recognized Mr. STUMP and Mr. 
MONTGOMERY, each for 20 minutes.
  After debate,
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. LATHAM, announced that two-thirds of the 
Members present had voted in the affirmative.
  So, two-thirds of the Members present having voted in favor thereof, 
the rules were suspended and said bill was passed.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby the rules were suspended and 
said bill was passed was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
bill.
```