UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
      ACT OF 1934

                 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002


[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
      ACT OF 1934


             For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-11935


                         CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX
      (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)



         California                                              94-2887133
(State or other jurisdiction of                               (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                              Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                       Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                   (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)

<PAGE>

                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)
                       (in thousands, except unit data)

                                  June 30, 2002

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Assets
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                $ 1,234
<S>                                                                           <C>
   Receivables and deposits                                                   1,193
   Restricted escrows                                                             5
   Other assets                                                                 696
   Investment properties:
      Land                                                   $ 11,635
      Buildings and related personal property                  90,845
                                                              102,480
      Less accumulated depreciation                           (54,220)       48,260
                                                                           $ 51,388
Liabilities and Partners' Deficit
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                          $ 272
   Tenant security deposits payable                                             276
   Accrued property taxes                                                       697
   Due to former affiliate                                                      270
   Other liabilities                                                          1,095
   Mortgage notes payable                                                    58,923

Partners' Deficit:
   General partner                                           $ (9,834)
   Limited partners (89,292 units issued and
      outstanding)                                               (311)      (10,145)
                                                                           $ 51,388


         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                     (in thousands, except per unit data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                         Three Months                Six Months
                                        Ended June 30,             Ended June 30,
                                      2002         2001          2002          2001

Revenues:
<S>                                 <C>           <C>           <C>          <C>
  Rental income                     $ 3,914       $ 4,130       $ 7,995      $ 8,321
  Other income                          319           375           669          657
  Gain on casualty                       --            --            --          156
       Total revenues                 4,233         4,505         8,664        9,134

Expenses:
  Operating                           1,503         1,492         2,879        2,865
  General and administrative            115           126           255          246
  Depreciation                          907           872         1,804        1,735
  Interest                            1,093         1,439         2,153        2,642
  Property tax                          347           354           694          704
       Total expenses                 3,965         4,283         7,785        8,192

Net income                           $ 268         $ 222         $ 879        $ 942

Net income allocated to
  general partner                     $ 32         $ 26          $ 104        $ 111
Net income allocated to
  limited partners                      236           196           775          831

                                     $ 268         $ 222         $ 879        $ 942

Net income per limited
  partnership unit                   $ 2.64       $ 2.20        $ 8.68        $ 9.31

Distributions per limited
  partnership unit                  $ 18.38       $ 8.20        $ 18.38      $ 21.78

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

            CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' (DEFICIT) CAPITAL
                                   (Unaudited)
                       (in thousands, except unit data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                     Limited
                                    Partnership    General       Limited
                                       Units       Partner      Partners       Total

<S>                                   <C>            <C>         <C>         <C>
Original capital contributions        89,292         $ --        $89,292     $ 89,292

Partners' (deficit) capital
   at December 31, 2001               89,292       $(9,718)       $ 555      $ (9,163)

Distributions paid to partners            --          (220)       (1,641)      (1,861)

Net income for the six months
   ended June 30, 2002                    --           104           775          879

Partners' deficit at
   June 30, 2002                      89,292       $(9,834)      $ (311)     $(10,145)

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>
                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                  Six Months Ended
                                                                        June 30,
                                                                  2002        2001
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                              <C>          <C>
  Net income                                                     $ 879        $ 942
  Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
   by operating activities:
     Depreciation                                                 1,804        1,735
     Amortization of loan costs and discount                         48           49
     Casualty gain                                                   --         (156)
     Change in accounts:
      Receivables and deposits                                       30         (120)
      Other assets                                                 (189)        (106)
      Accounts payable                                                2          (16)
      Tenant security deposits payable                              (24)          (1)
      Accrued property taxes                                         69          176
      Other liabilities                                             (12)          (3)
         Net cash provided by operating activities                2,607        2,500

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                           (832)      (1,044)
  Net insurance proceeds received                                    --          223
  Net withdrawals from restricted escrows                           164            9
         Net cash used in investing activities                     (668)        (812)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Payment on mortgage notes payable                                (489)        (585)
  Distributions to partners                                      (1,861)      (2,205)
         Net cash used in financing activities                   (2,350)      (2,790)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents                          (411)      (1,102)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                  1,645        2,172
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                      $ 1,234      $ 1,070

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                        $ 2,136      $ 2,350

At  December  31,  2001  and  June  30,  2002,  accounts  payable  and  property
improvements and replacements  were adjusted by approximately  $325,000 for each
period.

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                  NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)


Note A - Basis of Presentation

The  accompanying   unaudited   consolidated  financial  statements  of  Century
Properties Fund XIX (the  "Partnership" or  "Registrant")  have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted  accounting  principles for interim financial
information  and  with the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB  and  Item  310(b)  of
Regulation  S-B.  Accordingly,  they do not include all of the  information  and
footnotes  required by generally  accepted  accounting  principles  for complete
financial statements. The general partner of the Partnership is Fox Partners II,
a California  general  partnership.  The general partners of Fox Partners II are
Fox Capital Management Corporation ("FCMC" or the "Managing General Partner"), a
California  corporation,  Fox Realty  Investors  ("FRI"),  a California  general
partnership, and Fox Partners 83, a California general partnership. The Managing
General Partner is a subsidiary of Apartment  Investment and Management  Company
("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust. In the opinion of the
Managing  General  Partner,  all  adjustments  (consisting  of normal  recurring
accruals)  considered  necessary  for a fair  presentation  have been  included.
Operating  results for the three and six month  periods  ended June 30, 2002 are
not  necessarily  indicative  of the results that may be expected for the fiscal
year  ending  December  31,  2002.  For  further   information,   refer  to  the
consolidated   financial  statements  and  footnotes  thereto  included  in  the
Partnership's  Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December
31, 2001.

Note B - Casualty

In February 2000, one of the Partnership's investment properties, McMillan Place
Apartments,  incurred damages to its buildings as a result of a hail storm. As a
result of the damage,  approximately  $142,000 of fixed assets and approximately
$75,000 of  accumulated  depreciation  were written off resulting in a net write
off of approximately  $67,000. The property received  approximately  $223,000 in
proceeds from the insurance company to repair the damaged units during 2001. For
financial  statement  purposes,  a casualty gain of  approximately  $156,000 was
recognized as a result of the difference  between the proceeds  received and the
net book value of the buildings which were damaged.

In May  2001,  one of the  Partnership's  investment  properties,  Vinings  Peak
Apartments,  incurred  damages to ten units as a result of a fire. The estimated
damages to the property are approximately $636,000. Although the repairs are not
yet complete, the Partnership does not expect to incur a loss.

In  April  2002,  one of the  Partnership's  investment  properties,  Sandspoint
Apartments,  incurred  damages to  twenty-four  units as a result of a fire. The
estimated  damages to the property are  approximately  $382,000.  Repairs to the
property  have  begun but the  Partnership  does not expect to incur a loss from
this event.

Note C - Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The Registrant has no employees and is dependent on the Managing General Partner
and its  affiliates for the management  and  administration  of all  Partnership
activities.  The  Partnership  Agreement  provides  for (i) certain  payments to
affiliates for services and (ii)  reimbursement of certain expenses  incurred by
affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.

During the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001,  affiliates  of the Managing
General  Partner were  entitled to receive 5% of gross  receipts from all of the
Registrant's  properties  as  compensation  for  providing  property  management
services.  The Registrant  paid to such  affiliates  approximately  $444,000 and
$458,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, which is
included in operating expenses.

An  affiliate  of  the  Managing  General  Partner  received   reimbursement  of
accountable  administrative  expenses  amounting  to  approximately  $89,000 and
$84,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively,  which is
included in general and administrative expenses.

Pursuant  to  the  Partnership  Agreement,  for  managing  the  affairs  of  the
Partnership, the general partner is entitled to receive a Partnership management
fee  equal  to  10%  of the  Partnership's  adjusted  cash  from  operations  as
distributed.  Approximately $186,000 and $221,000 in Partnership management fees
were paid along with the  distributions  from operations  which were made during
the six months  ended June 30,  2002 and 2001,  respectively,  and  included  in
general partner distributions.

An  affiliate  of  the  Managing  General  Partner  has  made  available  to the
Partnership  a  credit  line  of  up to  $150,000  per  property  owned  by  the
Partnership.  The Partnership has no outstanding  amounts due under this line of
credit. Based on present plans, the Managing General Partner does not anticipate
the need to borrow in the near future. Other than cash and cash equivalents, the
line of credit is the Partnership's only unused source of liquidity.

Beginning in 2001, the  Partnership  began insuring its properties up to certain
limits through coverage provided by AIMCO which is generally  self-insured for a
portion of losses and  liabilities  related  to workers  compensation,  property
casualty and vehicle liability. The Partnership insures its properties above the
AIMCO  limits  through  insurance  policies  obtained  by  AIMCO  from  insurers
unaffiliated with the Managing General Partner. During the six months ended June
30,  2002 and 2001,  the  Partnership  was  charged by AIMCO and its  affiliates
approximately  $187,000 and $203,000,  respectively,  for insurance coverage and
fees associated with policy claims administration.

Note D - Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purports  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class  of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  which are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. ("Insignia") and entities which were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged  into AIMCO.  The  plaintiffs  seek  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
On June 25, 1998, the Managing General Partner filed a motion seeking  dismissal
of the action.  In lieu of responding  to the motion,  the  plaintiffs  filed an
amended  complaint.  The Managing General Partner filed demurrers to the amended
complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December 14, 1999, the Managing  General  Partner and its affiliates  terminated
the  proposed  settlement.  In  February  2000,  counsel  for some of the  named
plaintiffs filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who
negotiated  the  settlement.  On June  27,  2000,  the  Court  entered  an order
disqualifying  them  from the case and an  appeal  was  taken  from the order on
October 5, 2000. On December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff
Cabraser  Heimann & Bernstein  LLP as new lead  counsel for  plaintiffs  and the
putative class.  Plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint on January 19, 2001.
On March 2, 2001,  the  Managing  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On July 10, 2001, the Court issued an
order  sustaining  defendants'  demurrer on certain  grounds.  On July 20, 2001,
Plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court's July 10, 2001 order
granting in part and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001,
Plaintiffs  filed a fourth amended class and  derivative  action  complaint.  On
September 12, 2001, the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration.  On
October 5, 2001, the Managing General Partner and affiliated  defendants filed a
demurrer to the fourth amended complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001.
On February 2, 2002,  the Court served its order  granting in part the demurrer.
The  Court has  dismissed  without  leave to amend  certain  of the  plaintiffs'
claims.  On February 11, 2002,  plaintiffs  filed a motion  seeking to certify a
putative  class  comprised of all  non-affiliated  persons who own or have owned
units  in  the  partnerships.   The  Managing  General  Partner  and  affiliated
defendants  oppose the motion.  On April 29,  2002,  the Court held a hearing on
plaintiffs' motion for class  certification and took the matter under submission
after further  briefing,  as ordered by the court, was submitted by the parties.
On July 10, 2002,  the Court entered an order vacating the current trial date of
January 13, 2003 (as well as the  pre-trial  and  discovery  cut-off  dates) and
stayed the case in its entirety through November 7, 2002 so that the parties can
have an opportunity to discuss settlement.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first amended  complaint.  The first amended complaint in the Heller action is
brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserts  claims for among other
things  breach  of  fiduciary  duty;  unfair  competition;   conversion,  unjust
enrichment;  and judicial  dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a
motion to  consolidate  the Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that
the Heller action was filed in order to preserve the derivative claims that were
dismissed  without  leave to amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated
July 10, 2001. On October 5, 2001, the Managing  General  Partner and affiliated
defendants  moved to strike the first  amended  complaint  in its  entirety  for
violating  the Court's July 10, 2001 order  granting in part and denying in part
defendants'  demurrer in the Nuanes action, or alternatively,  to strike certain
portions of the complaint based on the statute of limitations.  Other defendants
in the action  demurred to the fourth  amended  complaint,  and,  alternatively,
moved to strike the complaint. On December 11, 2001, the court heard argument on
the motions  and took the matters  under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the
Court  served  notice of its order  granting  defendants'  motion to strike  the
Heller complaint as a violation of its July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes action.
On March 27, 2002,  the plaintiffs  filed a notice  appealing the order striking
the complaint. The parties are currently in the midst of briefing that appeal.

The Managing  General Partner does not anticipate that any costs,  whether legal
or  settlement  costs,  associated  with  these  cases will be  material  to the
Partnership's overall operations.

The  Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding  litigation that
is not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.
<PAGE>

ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The  matters  discussed  in this Form  10-QSB  contain  certain  forward-looking
statements  and  involve  risks and  uncertainties  (including  changing  market
conditions,   competitive  and  regulatory   matters,   etc.)  detailed  in  the
disclosures  contained  in this  Form  10-QSB  and the  other  filings  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission made by the Registrant from time to time. The
discussion of the  Registrant's  business and results of  operations,  including
forward-looking  statements  pertaining  to such  matters,  does not  take  into
account the effects of any changes to the  Registrant's  business and results of
operations.  Accordingly,  actual  results  could differ  materially  from those
projected in the forward-looking  statements as a result of a number of factors,
including those identified herein.

The Partnership's  investment  properties consist of eight apartment  complexes.
The following  table sets forth the average  occupancy of the properties for the
six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001:

                                                   Average Occupancy
      Property                                      2002       2001

      Sunrunner Apartments                          94%        96%
         St. Petersburg, Florida
      Misty Woods Apartments                        89%        90%
         Charlotte, North Carolina
      McMillan Place Apartments (1)                 94%        97%
         Dallas, Texas
      Vinings Peak Apartments (1)                   89%        93%
         Atlanta, Georgia
      Wood Lake Apartments (1)                      87%        92%
         Atlanta, Georgia
      Plantation Crossing                           86%        88%
         Atlanta, Georgia
      Greenspoint Apartments                        96%        94%
         Phoenix, Arizona
      Sandspoint Apartments (2)                     92%        95%
         Phoenix, Arizona

(1)   The  Managing  General  Partner  attributes  the  decrease in occupancy at
      McMillan  Place,  Vinings Peak and Wood Lake  Apartments  to a competitive
      market  with  competing   properties  offering  large  concessions  and  a
      favorable home buying market with low interest rates.

(2)   The  Managing  General  Partner  attributes  the  decrease in occupancy at
      Sandspoint  Apartments to a fire that damaged  twenty-four  units in April
      2002.

Results of Operations

The  Partnership's  net income for the three and six months  ended June 30, 2002
was approximately $268,000 and $879,000, respectively, compared to net income of
approximately  $222,000 and $942,000 for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001,  respectively.  The  increase in the net income for the three months ended
June 30,  2002 is due to a decrease in total  expenses,  offset by a decrease in
total  revenues.  The  decrease in net income for the six months  ended June 30,
2002 is due to a  decrease  in total  revenues  offset  by a  decrease  in total
expenses. Total revenues decreased for the six months ended June 30, 2002 due to
the  recognition  of a casualty  gain in 2001 and a decrease  in rental  income.
Total  revenues  decreased  for the three  months  ended June 30,  2002 due to a
decrease in rental income.  Rental income decreased for the three and six months
ended June 30,  2002 due to a decrease  in  occupancy  at all of the  investment
properties except for Greenspoint Apartments.

In February 2000, one of the Partnership's investment properties, McMillan Place
Apartments,  incurred damages to its buildings as a result of a hail storm. As a
result of the damage,  approximately  $142,000 of fixed assets and approximately
$75,000 of  accumulated  depreciation  were written off resulting in a net write
off of approximately  $67,000. The property received  approximately  $223,000 in
proceeds from the insurance company to repair the damaged units during 2001. For
financial  statement  purposes,  a casualty gain of  approximately  $156,000 was
recognized as a result of the difference  between the proceeds  received and the
net book value of the buildings which were damaged.

Total expenses decreased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 due to
a decrease in interest expense,  offset by an increase in depreciation  expense.
Interest  expense  decreased  due to a  decrease  in the  interest  rate  on the
mortgage encumbering  McMillian Place. On January 29, 1998, the Managing General
Partner  successfully  negotiated  a  modification  of the terms of the mortgage
encumbering  McMillian Place. The interest rate changed from 9.15% to a variable
rate of 325 basis points plus the  annualized  yield on United  States  Treasury
non-callable  bonds (5.27% at November 1, 2001 which is one year from maturity).
Depreciation  expense  increased due to fixed assets placed into service  during
the past 12 months.

Included  in general and  administrative  expense at both June 30, 2002 and 2001
are reimbursements to the Managing General Partner allowed under the Partnership
Agreement.  In  addition,   costs  associated  with  the  quarterly  and  annual
communications with investors and regulatory agencies are also included.

As part of the ongoing  business plan of the  Partnership,  the Managing General
Partner monitors the rental market  environment of its investment  properties to
assess the feasibility of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing occupancy
levels and protecting  the  Partnership  from increases in expenses.  As part of
this plan, the Managing General Partner attempts to protect the Partnership from
the burden of  inflation-related  increases in expenses by increasing  rents and
maintaining a high overall  occupancy  level.  However,  due to changing  market
conditions,  which  can  result  in the use of  rental  concessions  and  rental
reductions to offset softening market conditions, there is no guarantee that the
Managing General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2002, the Registrant had cash and cash  equivalents of approximately
$1,234,000 as compared to approximately $1,070,000 at June 30, 2001. For the six
months ended June 30, 2002, cash and cash  equivalents  decreased  approximately
$411,000 from the Registrant's calendar year end due to approximately $2,350,000
and  $668,000 of cash used in financing  activities  and  investing  activities,
respectively,  partially offset by approximately  $2,607,000 of cash provided by
operating  activities.  Net  cash  used in  financing  activities  consisted  of
distributions to partners and, to a lesser extent, payments of principal made on
the mortgages encumbering the Registrant's investment properties.  Net cash used
in investing  activities  consisted  of capital  improvements  and  replacements
partially  offset by net withdrawals from restricted  escrows  maintained by the
mortgage  lenders.  The  Partnership  invests  its working  capital  reserves in
interest bearing accounts.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures  required at the  properties  to  adequately  maintain the physical
assets and other  operating  needs of the Registrant and to comply with Federal,
state, and local legal and regulatory requirements. Capital improvements planned
for each of the Registrant's properties are detailed below.

Sunrunner Apartments

During  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2002,  the   Partnership   completed
approximately  $28,000 of capital  improvements  consisting  primarily  of floor
covering and HVAC replacements.  These improvements were funded from replacement
reserves and operating  cash flow.  Approximately  $69,000 has been budgeted for
2002 capital improvements at Sunrunner Apartments  consisting primarily of floor
covering,  appliance,  air  conditioning  unit and  water  heater  replacements.
Additional  improvements  may be  considered  and will  depend  on the  physical
condition  of the  property as well as  anticipated  cash flow  generated by the
property.

Misty Woods Apartments

During  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2002,  the   Partnership   completed
approximately $62,000 of capital improvements  consisting primarily of perimeter
fencing,  floor covering and appliance replacement,  wall coverings,  and office
computers.   These  improvements  were  funded  from  operating  cash  flow  and
replacement  reserves.  Approximately $84,000 has been budgeted for 2002 capital
improvements at Misty Woods  Apartments  consisting  primarily of floor covering
and appliance  replacements.  Additional improvements may be considered and will
depend on the physical condition of the property as well as replacement reserves
and anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

McMillan Place Apartments

During  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2002,  the   Partnership   completed
approximately  $34,000 of capital  improvements  consisting  primarily  of floor
covering replacements, interior decoration, office computers, and water heaters.
These improvements were funded from operating cash flow.  Approximately $114,000
has been budgeted for 2002 capital  improvements at McMillian  Place  Apartments
consisting primarily of floor covering  replacements,  interior decoration,  and
exterior painting.  Additional improvements may be considered and will depend on
the  physical  condition  of the  property  as well  as  anticipated  cash  flow
generated by the property.

Vinings Peak Apartments

During  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2002,  the   Partnership   completed
approximately   $110,000  of  budgeted  and  unbudgeted   capital   improvements
consisting  primarily  of  structural  improvements,  plumbing  fixtures,  floor
covering  replacements,  office computers,  air conditioning  upgrades, and wall
coverings.   These   improvements   were  funded  from   operating   cash  flow.
Approximately $90,000 has been budgeted for 2002 capital improvements at Vinings
Peak Apartments consisting primarily of floor covering replacements.  Additional
improvements may be considered and will depend on the physical  condition of the
property as well as anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Plantation Crossing Apartments

During  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2002,  the   Partnership   completed
approximately  $54,000 of capital  improvements  consisting  primarily of office
computers,  swimming pool upgrades,  floor covering and appliance  replacements.
These improvements were funded from operating cash flow.  Approximately  $72,000
has  been  budgeted  for  2002  capital   improvements  at  Plantation  Crossing
consisting primarily of swimming pool upgrades, wall coverings, resurfacing, and
floor  covering  and  appliance  replacements.  Additional  improvements  may be
considered and will depend on the physical  condition of the property as well as
anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Wood Lake Apartments

During  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2002,  the   Partnership   completed
approximately  $44,000  of  capital  improvements  consisting  primarily  of air
conditioning and water heater replacements,  wall coverings, appliance and floor
covering replacements.  These improvements were funded from operating cash flow.
Approximately  $75,000 has been budgeted for 2002 capital  improvements  at Wood
Lake Apartments consisting primarily of floor covering replacements.  Additional
improvements may be considered and will depend on the physical  condition of the
property as well as anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Greenspoint Apartments

During  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2002,  the   Partnership   completed
approximately $79,000 of capital improvements consisting primarily of structural
and plumbing improvements,  floor covering and appliance replacements, and major
landscaping.   These   improvements   were  funded  from  operating  cash  flow.
Approximately  $142,000  has been  budgeted  for 2002  capital  improvements  at
Greenspoint   Apartments  consisting  primarily  of  floor  covering,   exterior
painting,  major landscaping,  air conditioning unit replacements,  and plumbing
improvements.  Additional  improvements may be considered and will depend on the
physical condition of the property as well as anticipated cash flow generated by
the property.

Sands Point Apartments

During  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2002,  the   Partnership   completed
approximately  $96,000 of capital improvements  consisting primarily of plumbing
improvements, air conditioning unit replacements,  structural upgrades and floor
covering  and  appliance  replacements.  These  improvements  were  funded  from
operating cash flow.  Approximately  $149,000 has been budgeted for 2002 capital
improvements at Sands Point  Apartments  consisting  primarily of floor covering
replacements,  air conditioning unit replacements,  signage,  plumbing fixtures,
drapes and miniblinds. Additional improvements may be considered and will depend
on the  physical  condition  of the  property as well as  anticipated  cash flow
generated by the property.

The additional  capital  expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available
from operations or from Partnership  reserves.  To the extent that such budgeted
capital improvements are completed, the Registrant's distributable cash flow, if
any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.

The Partnership's  current assets are thought to be sufficient for any near-term
needs  (exclusive  of capital  improvements)  of the  Partnership.  The mortgage
indebtedness of approximately  $58,923,000,  net of discount,  is amortized over
varying periods with required  balloon  payments  ranging from October 2002, for
McMillian Place, to September 2021. The Managing General Partner will attempt to
refinance such  indebtedness  and/or sell the properties  prior to such maturity
dates. If the properties  cannot be refinanced or sold for a sufficient  amount,
the Registrant will risk losing such properties through foreclosure.

Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement,  the term of the Partnership is scheduled
to expire on December 31, 2007. Accordingly,  prior to such date the Partnership
will need to either  sell its  investment  properties  or extend the term of the
Partnership.

The Partnership  distributed  the following  amounts during the six months ended
June 30, 2002 and 2001 (in thousands except per unit data):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                      Six Months      Per Limited       Six Months      Per Limited
                        Ended         Partnership         Ended         Partnership
                    June 30, 2002         Unit        June 30, 2001         Unit

<S>                     <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>
Operations              $1,861           $18.38           $2,205           $21.78
</TABLE>

Future cash  distributions  will depend on the levels of net cash generated from
operations, the availability of cash reserves and the timing of debt maturities,
refinancings,  and/or  property  sales.  The  Partnership's  cash  available for
distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. There can be no assurance, however,
that the  Partnership  will  generate  sufficient  funds from  operations  after
required  capital  expenditures to permit further  distributions to its partners
during the remainder of 2002 or subsequent periods.

In addition to its  indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interest in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates owned 52,080.66 limited partnership units
in the  Partnership  representing  58.33% of the  outstanding  units at June 30,
2002. A number of these units were  acquired  pursuant to tender  offers made by
AIMCO or its  affiliates.  It is  possible  that  AIMCO or its  affiliates  will
acquire additional units of limited  partnership  interest in the Partnership in
exchange  for  cash  or a  combination  of  cash  and  units  in  the  operating
partnership of AIMCO either through private  purchases or tender offers. In this
regard, on June 25, 2002, a tender offer by AIMCO  Properites,  L.P., to acquire
any and all of the Units not owned by affiliates  of AIMCO for a purchase  price
of $243.00 per Unit expired.  Pursuant to this offer, AIMCO acquired 1,832 Units
during  the  quarter  ended  June 30,  2002.  Under the  Partnership  Agreement,
unitholders  holding a majority  of the Units are  entitled  to take action with
respect to a variety of matters which would include voting on certain amendments
to the Partnership  Agreement and voting to remove the Managing General Partner.
As a result of its ownership of 58.33% of the outstanding  units,  AIMCO is in a
position to influence all such voting  decisions with respect to the Registrant.
Although  the Managing  General  Partner  owes  fiduciary  duties to the limited
partners of the  Partnership,  the Managing  General Partner also owed fiduciary
duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the Managing
General  Partner,  as managing  general  partner,  to the  Partnerships  and its
limited  partners may come into conflict with the duties of the Managing General
Partner to AIMCO, as its sole  stockholder.  However,  IPLP, an affiliate of the
Managing  General  Partner,  is required  to vote  25,228.66  of its Units:  (i)
against any proposal to increase the fees and other compensation  payable by the
Partnership to the Managing General Partner and any of its affiliates;  and (ii)
on all other  matters  submitted by it or its  affiliates,  in proportion to the
votes cast by non tendering  unit holders.  Except for the  foregoing,  no other
limitations are imposed on IPLP's or AIMCO's right to vote its Units.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States which require the Partnership
to  make  estimates  and  assumptions.  The  Partnership  believes  that  of its
significant  accounting  policies,  the following may involve a higher degree of
judgment and complexity.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Investment  properties  are  recorded at cost,  less  accumulated  depreciation,
unless  considered  impaired.  If  events  or  circumstances  indicate  that the
carrying  amount of a property may be  impaired,  the  Partnership  will make an
assessment of its  recoverability  by estimating  the  undiscounted  future cash
flows,  excluding  interest  charges,  of the property.  If the carrying  amount
exceeds the aggregate  future cash flows,  the  Partnership  would  recognize an
impairment  loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the
property.

Real  property  investments  are  subject  to varying  degrees of risk.  Several
factors  may  adversely  affect  the  economic  performance  and  value  of  the
Partnership's  investment  properties.  These  factors  include  changes  in the
national,  regional and local economic  climate;  local  conditions,  such as an
oversupply  of  multifamily   properties;   competition   from  other  available
multifamily  property  owners and changes in market  rental  rates.  Any adverse
changes in these factors could cause an impairment in the Partnership's assets.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.
Rental income  attributable to leases is recognized monthly as it is earned. The
Partnership will offer rental concessions during  particularly slow months or in
response  to  heavy  competition  from  other  similar  complexes  in the  area.
Concessions are charged to income as incurred.



<PAGE>


                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purports  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class  of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  which are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. ("Insignia") and entities which were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged  into AIMCO.  The  plaintiffs  seek  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
On June 25, 1998, the Managing General Partner filed a motion seeking  dismissal
of the action.  In lieu of responding  to the motion,  the  plaintiffs  filed an
amended  complaint.  The Managing General Partner filed demurrers to the amended
complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December 14, 1999, the Managing  General  Partner and its affiliates  terminated
the  proposed  settlement.  In  February  2000,  counsel  for some of the  named
plaintiffs filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who
negotiated  the  settlement.  On June  27,  2000,  the  Court  entered  an order
disqualifying  them  from the case and an  appeal  was  taken  from the order on
October 5, 2000. On December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff
Cabraser  Heimann & Bernstein  LLP as new lead  counsel for  plaintiffs  and the
putative class.  Plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint on January 19, 2001.
On March 2, 2001,  the  Managing  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On July 10, 2001, the Court issued an
order  sustaining  defendants'  demurrer on certain  grounds.  On July 20, 2001,
Plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court's July 10, 2001 order
granting in part and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001,
Plaintiffs  filed a fourth amended class and  derivative  action  complaint.  On
September 12, 2001, the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration.  On
October 5, 2001, the Managing General Partner and affiliated  defendants filed a
demurrer to the fourth amended complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001.
On February 2, 2002,  the Court served its order  granting in part the demurrer.
The  Court has  dismissed  without  leave to amend  certain  of the  plaintiffs'
claims.  On February 11, 2002,  plaintiffs  filed a motion  seeking to certify a
putative  class  comprised of all  non-affiliated  persons who own or have owned
units  in  the  partnerships.   The  Managing  General  Partner  and  affiliated
defendants  oppose the motion.  On April 29,  2002,  the Court held a hearing on
plaintiffs' motion for class  certification and took the matter under submission
after further  briefing,  as ordered by the court, was submitted by the parties.
On July 10, 2002,  the Court entered an order vacating the current trial date of
January 13, 2003 (as well as the  pre-trial  and  discovery  cut-off  dates) and
stayed the case in its entirety through November 7, 2002 so that the parties can
have an opportunity to discuss settlement.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first amended  complaint.  The first amended complaint in the Heller action is
brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserts  claims for among other
things  breach  of  fiduciary  duty;  unfair  competition;   conversion,  unjust
enrichment;  and judicial  dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a
motion to  consolidate  the Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that
the Heller action was filed in order to preserve the derivative claims that were
dismissed  without  leave to amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated
July 10, 2001. On October 5, 2001, the Managing  General  Partner and affiliated
defendants  moved to strike the first  amended  complaint  in its  entirety  for
violating  the Court's July 10, 2001 order  granting in part and denying in part
defendants'  demurrer in the Nuanes action, or alternatively,  to strike certain
portions of the complaint based on the statute of limitations.  Other defendants
in the action  demurred to the fourth  amended  complaint,  and,  alternatively,
moved to strike the complaint. On December 11, 2001, the court heard argument on
the motions  and took the matters  under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the
Court  served  notice of its order  granting  defendants'  motion to strike  the
Heller complaint as a violation of its July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes action.
On March 27, 2002,  the plaintiffs  filed a notice  appealing the order striking
the complaint. The parties are currently in the midst of briefing that appeal.

The Managing  General Partner does not anticipate that any costs,  whether legal
or  settlement  costs,  associated  with  these  cases will be  material  to the
Partnership's overall operations.


ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

            a)    Exhibits:

                  Exhibit 3, Agreement of Limited  Partnership,  incorporated by
                  reference to Exhibit A to the  Prospectus  of the  Partnership
                  dated  September 20, 1983, as amended on June 13, 1989, and as
                  thereafter   supplemented,   contained  in  the   Registrant's
                  Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Reg. No. 2-79007).

                  Exhibit 99,  Certification  of Chief  Executive  Officer and
                  Chief Financial Officer.

            b)    Reports on Form 8-K:

                  None filed during the quarter ended June 30, 2002.



<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES



In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.



                                    CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX


                                    By:   FOX PARTNERS II
                                          Its General Partner


                                    By:   FOX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
                                          Its Managing General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                          Patrick J. Foye
                                          Executive Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Thomas C. Novosel
                                          Thomas C. Novosel
                                          Senior Vice President
                                          and Chief Accounting Officer


                                    Date: August 14, 2002


<PAGE>


Exhibit 99


                          Certification of CEO and CFO
                     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                            As Adopted Pursuant to
                Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Century  Properties
Fund XIX (the  "Partnership"),  for the quarterly  period ended June 30, 2002 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  Patrick J. Foye, as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer of
the Partnership, and Paul J. McAuliffe, as the equivalent of the Chief Financial
Officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Partnership.


                                    /s/  Patrick J. Foye
                                    Name:  Patrick J. Foye
                                    Date:  August 14, 2002


                                    /s/  Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Name:  Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Date:  August 14, 2002


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the  Partnership for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.