alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit32**

** **

CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF PALMETTOBANCSHARES, INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 

 

Theundersigned, as the chief executive officer and principal financial officer ofPalmetto Bancshares, Inc., certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe period ended September 30, 2007, which accompanies this certification,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained inthe periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc. at the datesand for the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and no purchaser orseller of securities or any other person shall be entitled to rely upon theforegoing certification for any purpose.  The undersigned expressly disclaimsany obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.

 

 

 

/s/      L. Leon Patterson                           

 L. Leon Patterson

 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

/s/      Paul W. Stringer                                              

 Paul W. Stringer

 President and Chief Operating Officer

Principal Financial Officer

 

 

Dated:  November 9, 2007
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Thomas D. Ogaard |                    |
|--------|---------------------------|-------------------------|
|   | Name:                     | Thomas D. Ogaard        |   |
|   | Title:                    | President and           |   |
|   |                      | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   | Date:                     | September 6, 2012       |   |

|   | /s/ Louis Casto |                            |
|--------|----------------------|---------------------------------|
|   | Name:                | Louis Casto                     |   |
|   | Title:               | Interim Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   | Date:                | September 6, 2012               |   |
EXHIBIT
      23.1




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**


We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
        333-128607, 333-10993, 333-100186, 333-106054, 333-106080, and 333-121059
        on
        Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-129454, 333-03303, 333-03289,
        333-61598, 333-76316, 333-76288, 333-88372, 333-100184, 333-113684, 333-121371,
        333-125010 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 8, 2006 (which express
        an
        unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs regarding the adoption
        of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, *Accounting
        for Asset Retirement Obligations* ,
        effective January 1, 2003, and Financial Accounting Standards Board Financial
        Interpretation No. 47, *Accounting
        for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations* in 2005,
        the change in actuarial valuation measurement date for the pension plan and
        other post-retirement benefits from September 30 to December 31 during 2003
        and
        PNM Resources, Inc.’s acquisition of TNP Enterprises, Inc. in 2005), relating to
        the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of
        PNM
        Resources, Inc. and management's report on the effectiveness of internal
        control
        over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of
        PNM
        Resources, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005.
 
 /s/
        DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 
 Philadelphia,
        Pennsylvania
 April
        18,
        2006
Rockingham,

Dec., 1899.

#### Dickey *v.*Boston & Maine Railroad.

"Whether a railroad crossing over a highway should be covered with snow to put it into a reasonably safe and convenient condition for public use is a • question of fact.

Case, for' negligence. Pacts agreed. The plaintiff’s sled, while “ set ” upon a Mghway crossing of the defendants’ railroad in consequence of the crossing being bare of snow, was run into by one of the defendants’ trains and injured. If it was the duty of the defendants to keep the crossing covered with snow, the plaintiff is to have judgment.

*Daniel J.*Daley, for the plaintiff.

*Oliver E. Branch,*for the defendants.

Chase, J.

It was the duty of the defendants to keep the highway crossing in a -reasonably safe and convenient condition for public use. P. S., *c.*159, *s.*1; *Concord*v. *Railroad,*69 N. H. 87. Whether it should have been covered with snow to put it into such condition is a question of fact. *Boothby*v. *Railway,*66 N. H. 342.

*Case discharged.*

All concurred.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 18


March 6, 2002

Board of Directors
El Paso CGP Company
1001 Louisiana
Houston, Texas 77002

Dear Directors:

We are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form
10-K filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

We have audited the consolidated financial statements included in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 and issued our
report thereon dated March 6, 2002. Note 14 to the financial statements
describes a change in the measurement dates used to account for pensions and
post-retirement benefits other than pensions from December 31 to September 30.
This change is considered to be a change in accounting principle and is being
made to conform the Company's measurement dates to the dates used by its parent
company, El Paso Corporation, for its benefit plans. It should be understood
that the preferability of one acceptable method of accounting over another, in
this case the use of measurement dates that are different from those previously
used to account for pensions and post-retirement benefits other than pensions,
has not been addressed in any authoritative accounting literature, and in
expressing our concurrence below we have relied on management's determination
that this change in accounting principle is preferable. Based on our reading of
management's stated reasons and justification for this change in accounting
principle in the Form 10-K, and our discussions with management as to their
judgment about the relevant business planning factors relating to the change, we
concur with management that such change represents, in the Company's
circumstances, the adoption of a preferable accounting principle in conformity
with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20.

Very truly yours,



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

 

I, William W. Krippaehne, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of Fisher Communications, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fisher Communications, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 9, 2004
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Bell Atlantic -  Maryland, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 33-55852) of our report
dated February 5, 1997, which includes an explanatory paragraph stating that the
Company changed its method of accounting for directory publishing revenues and
expenses in 1996 and discontinued accounting for its operations in accordance
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 71, "Accounting for the
Effects of Certain Types of Regulation," effective August 1, 1994, on our audits
of the financial statements and financial statement schedule of the Company as
of December 31, 1996 and December 31, 1995, and for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1996, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.



/s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


2400 Eleven Penn Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 25, 1997
From: rphct31@aol.com [mailto:rphct31@aol.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 5:31 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Citizen response to RIN 1210-AB33

To Whom it may concern 

 

I am responding to a proposal (RIN 1210-AB33)   being considered to convert 401k's

and IRA's into annuity‐like products. 

 

Let me be very clear, I am totally OPPOSED to any Mandatory conversion of ones assets

in part or total. 

 

I would prefer to see an option be made available for such an annuity‐like product  as a

CHOICE.

 

For those of us who have played by the rules, have made a conscious decision to forgo a

portion of our wages over time to save for the future and have been effectively

managing such, only to have it confiscated and or forced into an instrument that pays a

minimum return is not why I chose to save for my retirement. Since I manage my own

investments my returns are far greater than the Gov't could provide under such a

scenario. You're actions would result in significantly lowering my families standard of

living and indirectly even the Governments overall tax receipts, as well as a reduction in

consumption as I would not be able to maintain my current purchase levels. By

managing my own IRA account I have weathered this crisis very nicely. 

 

What is  also very sad about this proposal is that the perceived need is based on the

Governments desire to 'protect' retiree accounts from loss. Yet the fallacy of this idea is

that this crises was brought about entirely due to the Government and it's regulatory

agencies NOT protecting the individual investor/savers. The government failed to rein in

the fraud and excess of the Banks, the bubbles, fraudulent bookkeeping entities as well

as the creation of fraudulent and unregulated derivatives market, all well within the

current and existing laws already on the books.

 

We have a SEC that looks the other way when there is blatant market manipulation and

fraud. 

We have a Fed that claims they never saw it coming? 

We have a Government that manipulates the markets (the evidence is overwhelming) to

the benefit of the too big to fail. 

We have a FDIC that will not rein in the Banks risky practices 
We have A Freddie/Fannie that permits and condones risky housing loan practices. 

We have the repeal of laws that were implemented to prevent many of the causes of

today's crisis  Glass Steagle act 

We have the legalization of Fraudulent accounting practices Mark to model! 

We allow off shore bookkeeping and hiding of losses to paint a profitable book! 

We have massive risky assets being created and continue to be generated without any

'real' attempt to reign them in. CDS, Swaps, Derivatives etc. 

Fraudulent sale of the above instruments to pension funds, mutual funds etc 

 

I could go on but I think the pattern is clear. Bottom line none of these issues are being

addressed in any meaningful fashion nor is anyone being held accountable. Now your

going to FORCE me into tieing up my hard earned and saved assets into a low yielding

instrument to protect me!!!  NO THANK YOU. 

 

Sincerely 

 

Robert P Houle
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27711

OCT 3 0 2009

OFFICE OF

AIR QUALITY PLANNING

AND STANDARDS

Mr. Matthew Baker

Director - Monitoring Operations Division

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

P.O. Box 13087

Austin, TX 78711-3087

Dear Mr. Baker:

This letter transmits the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) approval ofthe

PAMS network plan for the state ofTexas dated July 1,2009, as required according to the

Ambient Air Monitoring Regulations. Per 40 CFR 58.11(c), the PAMS monitoring network

design and changes are subject to the approval ofthe Administrator, which has been

delegated to the Director ofthe Air Quality Assessment Division in EPA's Office of Air

Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS).

To inform the approval process, we worked with your Regional Office on a review of

your plan. We found that the plan meets or exceeds the minimum PAMS monitoring

requirements contained in Appendix D of40 CFR part 58. After careful consideration, we

are pleased to approve your PAMS monitoring plan.

I want to thank you and your stafffor all the work you have put into developing the

PAMS monitoring plan. For any questions, please contact Kevin Cavender ofmy staff at

cavender.kevin@epa.gov, or 919-541-2364.

Richard A. Wayland

Director

Air Quality Assessment Division

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov

RecycledJRecyclable • Printed wRh Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 25% Postconsumer)
cc:

Amir Pousamadi, Texas CEQ

Kristin Bourdon, Texas CEQ

Maria Martinez, EPAlRegion 6

Mark Sather, EPAlRegion 6

Regina Krystyn, EPAlRegion 6

Lewis Weinstock, EPA/OAQPS

Kevin Cavender, EPA/OAQPS
#### Frederick D. Potter, Appellant, v. Sylvanus J. Green, Respondent.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 22, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57174-57175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-17985]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control


Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have 
been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked 
Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more 
applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in 
property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and 
U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions 
with them.

DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for effective date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OFAC: Andrea Gacki, Director, tel.: 
202-622-2490; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-622-
2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; Assistant 
Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or Assistant 
Director for Sanctions Enforcement, Compliance & Analysis, tel.: 202-
622-2490.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Availability

    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions 
programs are available on OFAC's website (https://www.treasury.gov/ofac).

Notice of OFAC Action(s)

    On August 16, 2023, OFAC determined that the property and interests 
in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following persons are 
blocked under the relevant sanctions authority listed below.
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P

[[Page 57175]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN22AU23.053


    Dated: August 16, 2023.
Andrea M. Gacki,
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the 
Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2023-17985 Filed 8-21-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-C
*The case is unanimously ordered submitted without oral argument pursuant to

Fed. R. App. P. 34(a) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. This order and judgment is not binding

precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral

estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments;

nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th

Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

JAN 6 1998

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DWIGHT ARMSTRONG,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 97-3123

(D.C. No. 96-20074-01-KHV)

(District of Kansas)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before ANDERSON, MCKAY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

On January 27, 1997, defendant-appellant entered a plea of guilty to one

count of distribution of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). His

presentence report calculated a criminal history category of IV and total offense

level of 29. Defendant at sentencing moved for a downward departure under

U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3, arguing that his assigned criminal history category significantly

overrepresented the seriousness of his criminal history or the likelihood he would
- 2 -

commit future crimes. The district court denied the motion and imposed a

sentence of 124 months imprisonment, well within the guideline range.

Defendant now appeals the denial of his motion for a downward departure. 

“A discretionary refusal to depart downward is not reviewable by this court unless

it appears from the record the sentencing court erroneously believed the

Guidelines did not permit a downward departure.” United States v. Nelson, 54

F.3d 1540, 1544 (10th Cir. 1995). The sentencing court observed, in denying

defendant’s motion:

Well, I think that the Government’s position is well taken as a matter

of law and that a downward departure in these circumstances is not

justified.

I think, if anything, I am concerned that the defendant has been

nonresponsive to correction in his prior encounters with the legal

system and doesn’t seem to have taken very seriously any of the past

consequences of his encounters with the law. So I am not going to

depart downward on that basis because I don’t think that the criminal

history category of 4 overrepresents his disposition to commit further

crimes.

R. Vol. 2 at 8-9. 

The above record indicates the sentencing court was aware of its

discretionary power to depart downward in fixing Mr. Armstrong’s criminal

history category and declined to exercise its discretion. Thus, we lack jurisdiction

to consider this allegation of error. The district court is AFFIRMED.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.
- 3 -

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Carlos F. Lucero

Circuit Judge
H. Res. 135

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 9, 2001.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 581) to authorize the Secretary of the Interior

and the Secretary of Agriculture to use funds appropriated

for wildland fire management in the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2001, to reimburse the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the

National Marine Fisheries Service to facilitate the interagency cooperation required under the Endangered Species

Act of 1973 in connection with wildland fire management.

The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. Points

of order against consideration of the bill for failure to comply

with section 311 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974

are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and

shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee
2

•HRES 135 EH

on Resources. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The bill shall

be considered as read. All points of order against provisions

in the bill are waived. During consideration of the bill for

amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole

may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the

Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed

in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for

that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and

report the bill to the House with such amendments as may

have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered

as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
and 20C; and Establishment of Tolerances on 01/28/2015.
#### In the Matter of Proving the Will of Henry W. Tibbitts, Deceased. George Tibbitts, Appellant; Alice E. Tibbitts, Respondent.

*Matter of*Tibbitts, 136 App. Div. 906, affirmed.

(Argued April 27, 1911;

decided May 16, 1911.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 1, 1909, which affirmed an order of the court at a Trial Term denying a motion to set aside a verdict answering certain questions as to the validity of the will of Henry W. Tibbitts, deceased, and for a new trial.

*Homer Weston*and *Waldo Weston*for appellant.

*Frank B. Walker*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Gray, Haight, Werner and Hiscock, JJ. Dissenting: Cullen, Ch. J., Vann and Collin, JJ.
#### § 236.754 Line, open wire.

An overhead wire line consisting of single conductors as opposed to multiple-conductor cables.