alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Grafton,

Dec., 1894.

#### Whitcher & *a. v.*State. Warden *v.*Same. Randall & *a. v.*Same. Grafton County *v.*Same. Walker *v.*Same.

Petitions, under Laws 1893, *c.*94, for the reward offered for the arrest or causing the arrest of Almy. The court found that Whitcher and Brown, and Warden, through information furnished by them, caused Almy’s arrest; that none of the other petitioners arrested him or caused his arrest; awarded a part of the reward to Whitcher and Brown and a part to Warden, if it could lawfully be apportioned, otherwise the whole to Whitcher and Brown; and dismissed the other petitions. Each of the parties, including the state, excepted to all the court’s findings and orders not favorable to it, him, or her. No ground being stated or appearing on which any of the exceptions could bo sustained, they were overruled, and the reward adjudged in part to Whitcher and Brown, and in part to Warden.

Smith, J., did not sit.

*606*Samuel B. Page, John Kivel, William U. Cotton,*and *Bingham §• Bingham,*for Whitcher and Brown.

*Charles A. Bole,*for Warden.

*John L. Spring*and *James C. Harvey*(of Vermont), for Randall and others.

*Albert S. Batchellor,*for Grafton county.

*Mary E. Walker, pro se.*

*Edwin*Gr. *Eastman,'*attorney-general, and *John E.*Young, for the state.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 21

Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 20, 2001

Mr. HANSEN submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating majority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the

House of Representatives:

BUDGET: Mr. Sununu to rank after Mr. Nussle.

HOUSE ADMINISTRATION: Mr. Ney, Chairman.

STANDARDS OF OFFICIAL CONDUCT: Mr. Hefley, Chairman.

Æ
§ 268.7 Federal/State share and restrictions on the uses of Federal Maglev Funds. ( a ) *Federal share.* The Federal share of Full Projects Costs shall be not more than 2 ⁄ 3, with the remaining 1 ⁄ 3 paid by the grant recipient using non-Federal funds. Funds made available under STP and CMAQ are considered non-Federal funds for purposes of the matching requirement.
( b ) *Restrictions on the uses of Federal Maglev Funds.* ( 1 ) Federal Maglev Funds may be applied only to Eligible Project Costs;
( 2 ) Federal Maglev Funds provided under a preconstruction planning grant may be used only for Phase II activities, and for completion of site-specific draft EIS's; see § 268.3;
( 3 ) Federal Maglev Funds may be used to pay for only 2 ⁄ 3 of preconstruction planning costs; grant recipients are required to pay the remaining 1 ⁄ 3 of the costs with non-Federal funds; and
( 4 ) The “prevailing wages” requirement of the Davis Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 276a-276a-5) applies to any construction contracts under the Maglev Deployment Program.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Leander E. Terhune, Appellant, *v.*Theodore A. Bingham, as Police Commissioner *of*the City *of*New York, Respondent.

*People ex rel. Terhune*v. *Bingham,*132 App. Div. 929, affirmed.

(Argued April 26, 1911;

decided May 16, 1911.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 28, 1909, which dismissed a writ of certiorari and affirmed the proceedings of the defendant in dismissing the relator from the police force of the city of New York.

*556
      *Jacob Rouss*and *Louis J. Grant*for appellant.

*Archibald R. Watson, Corporation Counsel (Terence Farley*and *Harry Crone*of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed, with, costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ.
1210-AB32-2-1300.html[7/24/2015 10:27:42 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvv-9bgq

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1795

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I worked very hard to save my money to augment my pension. I do not want the government involved in my

 401K.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Robert C. BatemanRobert C. BatemanSenior Vice President
Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 24.6**

 

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

 

KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, Sue L. Gin do hereby appoint John W. Rowe and Randall E. Mehrberg, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and onmy behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2006 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform allthings necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present. 

 

 

 

 

 

DATE: February 8, 2007
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0956.html[7/21/2015 6:50:39 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-o3h7

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0956

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Larry Schug

Address:

10717 Staghound Trail

Zebulon, NC, 27597

Email: schuglcjam@bellsouth.net

Phone: 9196650697

General Comment

I do not have any need for the government controlling my retirement, if only I had my SS I could be retired

 helping others, do for themselves. If government was good at it what happened to SS. My wife and I've worked

 too hard to have the government think they know better.
#### § 552.10 Denial of petition.

If a petition is denied, a Federal Register notice of the denial is issued within 45 days of the denial, setting forth the reasons for denial of the petition.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.15
                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


      This Amendment to that certain Employment Agreement (the "Amendment") by
and between PROXYMED, INC., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), and TIMOTHY
J. TOLAN (the "Executive") dated January 23, 2001, is entered into as of JANUARY
1, 2004 (the "Amendment Date"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and
agreements hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows:

      WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive have agreed to amend that certain
Employment Agreement;

      NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

      1. The Employment Agreement of the Executive shall automatically renewed
for a period of one (1) year from January 29, 2004 to January 28, 2005, and
shall be automatically extended from year to year thereafter unless otherwise
terminated in accordance with the terms of the Employment Agreement.

      2. Commencing on the Amendment Date, the Executive's position shall be
Executive Vice President-Sales and Account Management, reporting to the Chief
Operating Officer.

      3. Commencing on the Amendment Date, the Executive's annual salary shall
be $175,000.00 payable in accordance with the Company's then-current payroll
practices and subject to any subsequent increases recommended by the Company's
Compensation Committee and approved by the Company's Board of Directors in
writing. Any such subsequent written document is hereby incorporated by
reference and made a part of and shall amend the relevant terms of the
Employment Agreement automatically.

      4. Except as otherwise modified herein, all terms and conditions of the
Executive's Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. To the
extent that a conflict shall exist as between the terms or conditions of the
Employment Agreement and this Amendment, those of this Amendment shall prevail.

      5. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, all of
which shall be considered one and the same agreement and shall become effective
when one or more counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and
delivered to the other parties.

      6. This Amendment constitutes the entire agreement, and supersede all
prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral, among the parties
with respect to the transactions contemplated hereby, and (b) is not intended to
confer upon any person other than the parties hereto any rights or remedies.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Amendment, in
the case of the Company by its duly authorized officer, as of the day and year
first above written.

PROXYMED, INC.                         EXECUTIVE:


By:  /s/ NANCY J. HAM                  By: /s/ TIMOTHY J. TOLAN
     -----------------------------         -----------------------------------
     SIGNATURE                                           SIGNATURE

Print Name:  NANCY J. HAM              Print Name:  TIMOTHY J. TOLAN
           -----------------------                 ---------------------------

Title: PRESIDENT
       ---------------------------
Editorial Note on Part 397
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 397 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 397.67 Motor carrier responsibility for routing. ( a ) A motor carrier transporting NRHM shall comply with NRHM routing designations of a State or Indian tribe pursuant to this subpart.
( b ) A motor carrier carrying hazardous materials required to be placarded or marked in accordance with 49 CFR 177.823 and not subject to NRHM routing designations pursuant to this subpart, shall operate the vehicle over routes which do not go through or near heavily populated areas, places where crowds are assembled, tunnels, narrow streets, or alleys, except where the motor carrier determines that: ( 1 ) There is no practicable alternative;
( 2 ) A reasonable deviation is necessary to reach terminals, points of loading and unloading, facilities for food, fuel, repairs, rest, or a safe haven; or
( 3 ) A reasonable deviation is required by emergency conditions, such as a detour that has been established by a highway authority, or a situation exists where a law enforcement official requires the driver to take an alternative route.
( c ) Operating convenience is not a basis for determining whether it is practicable to operate a motor vehicle in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) Before a motor carrier requires or permits a motor vehicle containing explosives in Class 1, Divisions 1.1, 1.2, or 1.3, as defined in 49 CFR 173.50 and 173.53 respectively, to be operated, the carrier or its agent shall prepare a written route plan that complies with this section and shall furnish a copy to the driver. However, the driver may prepare the written plan as agent for the motor carrier when the trip begins at a location other than the carrier's terminal.
[59 FR 51830, Oct. 12, 1994, as amended at 78 FR 58485, Sept. 24, 2013]
Editorial Note on Part 381
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 381 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 381.205 How do I determine when I may request a waiver? ( a ) You may request a waiver if one or more FMCSR would prevent you from using or operating CMVs, or make it unreasonably difficult to do so, during a unique, non-emergency event that will take no more than three months to complete.
( b ) Before you decide to request a waiver, you should carefully review the regulation to determine whether there are any practical alternatives already available that would allow your use or operation of CMVs during the event. You should also determine whether you need a waiver from all of the requirements in one or more parts of the regulations, or whether a more limited waiver of certain sections within one or more of the parts of the regulations would provide an acceptable level of regulatory relief. For example, if you need relief from one of the recordkeeping requirements concerning driver qualifications, you should not request relief from all of the requirements of part 391.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1366.html[7/23/2015 6:24:15 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvl-24zb

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1366

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Brandon Hieter

General Comment

The government has no right to regulate my retirement income and tell me how to spend it. We are over taxed so

 as it is, now you want to tell us how to use our 401k's, enough is enough.
H. Res. 288

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 15, 2001.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 2269) to amend title

I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to promote the provision of retirement investment advice to workers managing

their retirement income assets. The bill shall be considered as

read for amendment. In lieu of the amendments recommended by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in

the bill, the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed

in part A of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted. The

previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill,

as amended, and on any further amendment thereto to final

passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour and

40 minutes of debate on the bill, as amended, with one hour

equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking
2

•HRES 288 EH

minority member of the Committee on Education and the

Workforce and 40 minutes equally divided and controlled by

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee

on Ways and Means; (2) the further amendment printed in

part B of the report of the Committee on Rules, if offered

by Representative George Miller of California or his designee,

which shall be in order without intervention of any point of

order, shall be considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the

proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit

with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph J. Lazzara, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Scientific Technologies Incorporated
for the fiscal quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly represents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Scientific Technologies Incorporated.

|Dated: November 14, 2005 | By: /s/Joseph J. Lazzara
   Name: Joseph J. Lazzara
   Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





I, Richard O. Faria, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Scientific Technologies
Incorporated for the fiscal quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly
represents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Scientific Technologies
Incorporated.

|Dated: November 14, 2005 | By: /s/ Richard O. Faria
   Name: Richard O. Faria
   Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.241 What are the first steps in any alcohol screening test? As the BAT or STT you will take the following steps to begin all alcohol screening tests, regardless of the type of testing device you are using: ( a ) When a specific time for an employee's test has been scheduled, or the collection site is at the employee's worksite, and the employee does not appear at the collection site at the scheduled time, contact the DER to determine the appropriate interval within which the DER has determined the employee is authorized to arrive. If the employee's arrival is delayed beyond that time, you must notify the DER that the employee has not reported for testing. In a situation where a C/TPA has notified an owner/operator or other individual employee to report for testing and the employee does not appear, the C/TPA must notify the employee that he or she has refused to test.
( b ) Ensure that, when the employee enters the alcohol testing site, you begin the alcohol testing process without undue delay. For example, you must not wait because the employee says he or she is not ready or because an authorized employer or employee representative is delayed in arriving. ( 1 ) If the employee is also going to take a DOT drug test, you must, to the greatest extent practicable, ensure that the alcohol test is completed before the urine collection process begins.
( 2 ) If the employee needs medical attention (*e.g.,* an injured employee in an emergency medical facility who is required to have a post-accident test), do not delay this treatment to conduct a test.
( c ) Require the employee to provide positive identification. You must see a photo ID issued by the employer (other than in the case of an owner-operator or other self-employer individual) or a Federal, state, or local government (*e.g.,* a driver's license). You may not accept faxes or photocopies of identification. Positive identification by an employer representative (not a co-worker or another employee being tested) is also acceptable. If the employee cannot produce positive identification, you must contact a DER to verify the identity of the employee.
( d ) If the employee asks, provide your identification to the employee. Your identification must include your name and your employer's name but is not required to include your picture, address, or telephone number.
( e ) Explain the testing procedure to the employee, including showing the employee the instructions on the back of the ATF.
( f ) Complete Step 1 of the ATF.
( g ) Direct the employee to complete Step 2 on the ATF and sign the certification. If the employee refuses to sign this certification, you must document this refusal on the “Remarks” line of the ATF and immediately notify the DER. This is a refusal to test.
Marine Harriers from USS Kearsarge join fight against ISIL
 
  By By USS Kearsarge Amphibious Ready Group
  **THE GULF (Nov. 19, 2015) —** Naval Aviation rejoined the
fight against ISIL Nov. 19 when AV-8B Harriers from Marine Medium Tiltrotor
Squadron (VMM) 162 (Reinforced) launched from the amphibious assault ship USS
Kearsarge (LHD 3) to conduct their first missions over Iraq in support of
Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR). The last Naval Aviation missions in support of OIR were Oct. 17, from USS
Essex (LHD 2).
"We will continue to work with our coalition partners to drive ISIL out of
Iraq and Syria," said Lt. Col. Brian T. Koch, commanding officer of
VMM-162 (REIN). "We operate around the clock to defend America, and to
keep our families at home safe." 
VMM-162 (REIN) is the aviation combat element of the 26th MEU, currently
embarked with the Kearsarge ARG.
Capt. Augustus P. Bennett, commander, Kearsarge Amphibious Ready Group (ARG),
said the Sailors and Marines under his charge are prepared for what lies ahead.
The Kearsarge Amphibious Ready Group with the embarked 26th MEU along with our
coalition partners are here to degrade and destroy ISIL's current operations
under OIR," Bennett said. "The combined ARG-MEU team is an
expeditionary Navy/Marine Corps force that stands ready and has been trained
for these types of operations. We're here to assure our allies, deter any
adversaries and provide a persistent U.S. presence here in the U.S. 5th Fleet
area of operations." In addition to Naval Aviation missions against ISIL in support of OIR, the
Marines and Sailors of the ARG-MEU team are deployed throughout the region
conducting various missions including theater security cooperation and maritime
security operations.
The Kearsarge ARG arrived in the U.S. 5th Fleet Nov. 1. The U.S. 5th Fleet's
area of operations encompasses about 2.5 million square miles of the Middle
East's maritime reaches and includes the Arabian Gulf, Red Sea, Gulf of Oman,
Gulf of Aden, Arabian Sea and parts of the Indian Ocean.
Exhibit 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBC) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Tony J. Sorcic, President & Chief Executive Officer of PNBC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of PNBC.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|/s/ Tony J. Sorcic                                  
|----------------------------------------------------
|Tony J. Sorcic
President  &  Chief Executive Officer



August 4, 2006

---