alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Anne Wick, EPA Diesel Engine Consent Decree Coordinator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Mail Code 2242A), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460,                         *e-mail: wick.anne@epa.gov.*

Karen S. Dworkin,

Assistant Chief, Environment & Natural Resources Division, Environmental Enforcement Section.

[FR Doc. 07-4744  Filed 9-26-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Theundersigned, Joseph A. Sasenick, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of AlcideCorporation, and John P. Richards, President and Chief Financial Officer ofAlcide Corporation, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  the quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of Alcide Corporation for the period ended August 31, 2003(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)                                  the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Alcide Corporation.

 

 
| Dated:  October 14, 2003 |                                                       |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|                          |                                                       |
|                          |                                                       |
|                          | /s/  Joseph A. Sasenick                                    |   |
|                          | Joseph  A. Sasenick                                        |
|                          | Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer,  Alcide Corporation |
|                          |                                                       |
|                          |                                                       |
|                          | /s/ John P. Richards                                       |   |
|                          | John P. Richards                                           |
|                          | President and Chief  Financial Officer,Alcide Corporation  |
|                               |                                                            |  |  |

 

1

----
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Heritage Worldwide, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350:





(1)  The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
      February 23, 2009
            /s/ Jean Claude
      Mas


Jean Claude Mas


Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer


(Principal Executive
Officer)


Heritage Worldwide, Inc.
ATA-10-310-E

Jul 09 2010

Exemp tion No. 134M Regul atory Docket No. FAA-2001-9410

Lt. Colonel Timothy M. Kersey Chief, Flight Standards Division Department of the Air Force

6500 South MacArthur Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73169

Dear Lt. Col. Kersey:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted y our petition to extend Exemption No. 134, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

On June 15, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviati on Administration (FAA) on behalf of the U.S. Air Force (USAF) for an extension of Exemption No. 134, as amended. That exemption from § 91.159 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulati ons allows the USAF to conduct nontraining photographic reconnaissance missions that require flying a series of tracks at a constant altitude under visual flight rules, withou t maintaining the appropriate cruising altitudes required by § 91.159.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were th e basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for n ot publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register

because the requested extension of the exemption w ould not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the USAF.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for t he issuance of Exemption No. 134, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exempti on and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. § 40109, which the FAA Administrator has2

delegated to me, I grant your petition. Notwithstan ding the provisions of the exemption, the pilot of an aircraft engaged in the above operation s is not relieved of the responsibility to see and avoid other aircraft as required by other provi sions of the regulations.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exempt ion No. 134, as amended, to September 30, 2013, unless sooner superseded or re scinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 134 , as amended, remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemp tion No. 134.

Sincerely,

/s/ Elizabeth Ray Director, Airspace and Aeronautical Information Man agement3

Project No.: ATA-10-310-E

Project Officer: _______________

ARM-105:TTHOMAS:06/21/10:Doc# 30210 ARM-1/100/105:AJR-33

LT COLONEL TIMOTHY M KERSEY

CHIEF FLIGHT STANDARDS DIVISION

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

6500 SOUTH MACARTHUR BOULEVARD

OKLAHOMA CITY OK 73169
Editorial Note on Part 572
Editorial Notes: 1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 572.142 Head assembly and test procedure. ( a ) The head assembly (refer to § 572.140(a)(1)(i)) for this test consists of the head (drawing 210-1000), adapter plate (drawing ATD 6259), accelerometer mounting block (drawing SA 572-S80), structural replacement of 1 ⁄ 2 mass of the neck load transducer (drawing TE-107-001), head mounting washer (drawing ATD 6262), one 1 ⁄ 2-20 × 1′′ flat head cap screw (FHCS) (drawing 9000150), and 3 accelerometers (drawing SA-572-S4).
( b ) When the head assembly in paragraph (a) of this section is dropped from a height of 376.0±1.0 mm (14.8±0.04 in) in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section, the peak resultant acceleration at the location of the accelerometers at the head CG shall not be less than 250 g or more than 280 g. The resultant acceleration versus time history curve shall be unimodal, and the oscillations occurring after the main pulse shall be less than 10 percent of the peak resultant acceleration. The lateral acceleration shall not exceed ±15 G (zero to peak).
( c ) *Head test procedure.* The test procedure for the head is as follows: ( 1 ) Soak the head assembly in a controlled environment at any temperature between 18.9 and 25.6 °C (66 and 78 °F) and at any relative humidity between 10 and 70 percent for at least four hours prior to a test.
( 2 ) Prior to the test, clean the impact surface of the head skin and the steel impact plate surface with isopropyl alcohol, trichlorethane, or an equivalent. Both impact surfaces must be clean and dry for testing.
( 3 ) Suspend the head assembly with its midsagittal plane in vertical orientation as shown in Figure P1 of this subpart. The lowest point on the forehead is 376.0 ±1.0 mm (14.76 ±0.04 in) from the steel impact surface. The 3.3 mm (0.13 in) diameter holes, located on either side of the dummy's head in transverse alignment with the CG, shall be used to ensure that the head transverse plane is level with respect to the impact surface.
( 4 ) Drop the head assembly from the specified height by a means that ensures a smooth, instant release onto a rigidly supported flat horizontal steel plate which is 50.8 mm (2 in) thick and 610 mm (24 in) square. The impact surface shall be clean, dry and have a finish of not less than 203.2 × 10−6 mm (8 micro inches) (RMS) and not more than 2032.0 × 10−6 mm (80 micro inches) (RMS).
( 5 ) Allow at least 2 hours between successive tests on the same head.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThermophysical properties of Helium-4 from 0.8 to 1500 K with pressures to 2000 MPaTabular summary data of the thermophysical properties of fluid helium are given for temperatures from 0.8 to 1500 K, with pressures to 2000 MPa between 75 and 300 K, or to 100 MPa outside of this temperature band. Properties include density, specific heats, enthalpy, entropy, internal energy, sound velocity, expansivity, compressibility, thermal conductivity, and viscosity. The data are calculated from a computer program which is available from the National Institute of Standards and Technology. The computer program is based on carefully fitted state equations for both normal and superfluid helium.Document ID19900019365Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsArp, Vincent D.*(National Inst. of Standards and Technology Boulder, CO, United States)*Mccarty, Robert D.*(National Inst. of Standards and Technology Boulder, CO, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1989Subject CategoryInorganic And Physical ChemistryReport/Patent NumberNIST-TN/1334NAS 1.26:186992PB90-183351NASA-CR-186992Accession Number90N28681Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900019365.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# 2015

# 2014

# 2013

# 2012

# 2011

# 2010

# 2009

# 2008

# 2007

# 2006

# 2005

# 2004

# 2003

# 2002

# 2001

# 2000

# 1999

# 1998

# 1997

# 1996

# 1995

# 1994

# 1993

# 1992
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for
the periods presented in the Report.
   /s/ C. Neil LyonsC. Neil LyonsChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer)
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 11:04 AM

To: 'bpufpaff@gmail.com' Subject: Petition for Exemption: RPM, LLC (Docket No. FAA-2014-1125)



### April 1, 2015

Mr. Bradley Pufpaff Chief Operations Officer
RPM, LLC

P.O. Box 1018 Rogersville, AL 35652

Dear Mr. Pufpaff:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-1125). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make, mode l, and type (i.e. - fixed-wing, ro torcraft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description shoul d include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by April 15, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
# December 18: Military airstrikes continue against ISIS terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published Dec. 18, 2017
Dec. 18, 2017Release # 20171218-01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**SOUTHWEST ASIA –** Between Dec. 15 and Dec. 17, Coalition military forces conducted 19 strikes consisting of 26 engagements against ISIS terrorists in Syria and Iraq.On Dec. 17 in Syria, Coalition military forces conducted eight strikes consisting of 13 engagements against ISIS targets.•       Near Abu Kamal, eight strikes engaged eight ISIS tactical units.On Dec. 17 in Iraq, Coalition military forces conducted one strike consisting of one engagement against ISIS targets.•       Near Rutbah, one strike destroyed an ISIS-held building.On Dec. 16 in Syria, Coalition military forces conducted three strikes consisting of three engagements against ISIS targets.•       Near Abu Kamal, three strikes engaged two ISIS tactical units and destroyed two ISIS vehicles and an ISIS-held building.There were no reported strikes conducted in Iraq on Dec. 16, 2017.On Dec. 15 in Syria, Coalition military forces conducted five strikes consisting of seven engagements against ISIS targets.•       Near Abu Kamal, five strikes engaged four ISIS tactical units and destroyed two ISIS vehicles, two logistics centers, an ISIS headquarters, a fighting position and an explosive hazard.On Dec. 15 in Iraq, Coalition military forces conducted two strikes consisting of two engagements against ISIS targets.•       Near Rutbah, two strikes engaged an ISIS tactical unit and destroyed an ISIS fuel truck and an ISIS storage container.These strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to ensure the enduring defeat of ISIS in Iraq and Syria.  The destruction of ISIS targets in Iraq and Syria also further limits the group’s ability to project terror and conduct external operations throughout the region and the rest of the world.This Coalition strike release contains all strikes conducted by fighter, attack, bomber, rotary-wing, or remotely piloted aircraft, rocket propelled artillery and ground-based tactical artillery.A strike, as defined in the Coalition release, refers to one or more kinetic engagements that occur in roughly the same geographic location to produce a single, sometimes cumulative effect in that location.  For example, a single aircraft delivering a single weapon against a lone ISIS vehicle is one strike, but so is multiple aircraft delivering dozens of weapons against a group of ISIS-held buildings and weapon systems in a compound, having the cumulative effect of making that facility harder or impossible to use. Strike assessments are based on initial reports and may be refined.CJTF-OIR does not report the number or type of aircraft employed in a strike, the number of munitions dropped in each strike, or the number of individual munition impact points against a target. The information used to compile the daily strike releases is based on 'Z' or Greenwich Mean Time.-30-
H. Res. 206

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 25, 2001.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2590) making appropriations for the Treasury

Department, the United States Postal Service, the Executive

Office of the President, and certain Independent Agencies,

for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, and for other

purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with.

All points of order against consideration of the bill are

waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall

not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on

Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The amendments printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted in

the House and in the Committee of the Whole. Points of
2

•HRES 206 EH

order against provisions in the bill, as amended, for failure

to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived. The amendment printed in the Congressional Record and numbered 5

pursuant to clause 8 of rule XVIII may be offered only by

Representative Smith of New Jersey or his designee and only

at the appropriate point in the reading of the bill. All points

of order against that amendment are waived. During consideration of the bill for further amendment, the Chairman of

the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of

rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as

read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill, as amended, to the House with such further amendments as may have

been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as

ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit

with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 526.4 [Reserved]
1210-AB32-2-1525.html[7/26/2015 6:52:14 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwo-ahko

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2022

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I plan my own retirement. You need to stay out of it.
1210-AB32-2-1155.html[7/24/2015 7:01:06 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvr-apwc

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1649

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Tim Ritchie

Address:

South Daytona, FL,

General Comment

My wife and I are over 60 years old and only have retirement income I personally built, a great deal from an IRA

 that I have been building for over 30 years. GOVERNMENT GREED CANNOT TAKE WHAT LITTLE WE

 HAVE. THERE IS NO WAY FOR ME TO RE-ENTER THE WORKFORCE NOW TO MAKE UP WHAT

 GOVERNMENT WANTS TO TAKE. MIGHT AS WELL BE A DEATH WARRANT. I already cannot afford

 health insurance due to the extremely high Obamacare requirements.