alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fisher Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q/A), I William W. Krippaehne Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: September 12, 2003

/s/ William W. Krippaehne Jr.William W. Krippaehne Jr. President and
Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.303 What happens if the SAP believes the employee needs additional treatment, aftercare, or support group services even after the employee returns to safety-sensitive duties? ( a ) As a SAP, if you believe that ongoing services (in addition to follow-up tests) are needed to assist an employee to maintain sobriety or abstinence from drug use after the employee resumes the performance of safety-sensitive duties, you must provide recommendations for these services in your follow-up evaluation report (see § 40.311(d)(10)).
( b ) As an employer receiving a recommendation for these services from a SAP, you may, as part of a return-to-duty agreement with the employee, require the employee to participate in the recommended services. You may monitor and document the employee's participation in the recommended services. You may also make use of SAP and employee assistance program (EAP) services in assisting and monitoring employees' compliance with SAP recommendations. Nothing in this section permits an employer to fail to carry out its obligations with respect to follow-up testing (see § 40.309).
( c ) As an employee, you are obligated to comply with the SAP's recommendations for these services. If you fail or refuse to do so, you may be subject to disciplinary action by your employer.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in each Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (file numbers 33-5456, 33-38590, 33-39374, 33-53763,
33-53899, 33-801767, 333-101767, 333-110726 and 333-109359) of CLARCOR Inc. and
Subsidiaries of our report dated January 8, 2004 relating to the consolidated
financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which
is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent
to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January 8, 2004 relating
to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

                                         /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 18, 2004
Coos,

Dec., 1894.

#### Benton & *a., Adm’rs, v.*Hopkins *& a.*

Assumpsit, upon a promissory note payable to the order of M. V. Hopkins and bearing the following indorsements: *“*M. V. Hopkins, J. M. Hopkins. Waiving demand and notice. M. V. Hopkins, J. M. Hopkins.” The plaintiffs are administrators of the estate of Jacob Benton, indorsee of the note. At a hearing before a referee, the defendants moved that J. M. Hopkins be discharged, on the ground that successive indorsers cannot be joined as defendants, offered his evidence in regard to the note, and excepted to a denial of the motion and the exclusion of the evidence. The plaintiffs did not elect to testify.

*Brew, Jordan Buckley,*for the plaintiffs.

*Ladd $ Fletcher,*for the defendants.

Clark, J.

The question in this case is one of procedure for the trial term. It does not appear whether the defendants are not jointly liable to Benton, the indorsee. If they are, there is no question that the action can be maintained.

As the plaintiffs did not elect to testify, the defendants could not testify to any facts occurring in the lifetime of Benton. P: 8., c. 224, s. 16.

*Case discharged.*

All concurred.
###### Editorial Note on Part 385

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 385.601 Scope of rules.

The rules in this subpart govern the application by a non-North America-domiciled motor carrier to provide transportation of property and passengers in interstate commerce in the United States.
1210-AB32-2-1614.html[7/26/2015 9:03:27 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jxy-cg4m

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2111

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I do not need the government to tell me who to use as an advisor, nor what to invest in. It is my money, and I am

 intelligent enough to deal with this on my own, or with my selected advisor. Stay out of my life.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0601.html[7/21/2015 6:36:35 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-4ec3

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0601

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I am smart enough to plan for my own retirement and how to use my money for my retirement. We do not need

 more regulations that restrict how we use our own hard-earned money. Thank you for your time and

 consideration.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Alfacell  Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Lawrence A.
Kenyon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date:  March 12, 2007

                              /s/ Lawrence A. Kenyon
                              ----------------------
                              Name:  Lawrence A. Kenyon
                              Title: Chief Financial Officer
                                     (Principal Accounting Officer and Principal
                                     Financial Officer)


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Alfacell  Corporation  and will be retained by Alfacell  Corporation
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.
#### Watson H. Whipple, Respondent, *v.*Lyons Beet Sugar Refining Company, Appellant.

*Whipple*v. *Lyons Beet Sugar Refining Co.,*137 App. Div. 881, affirmed.

(Argued March 30, 1911;

decided April 25, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered October 25, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action on contract.

*Charles P. Williams*for appellant.

*Irving U Hommedieu*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

.Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Chase and Collin, JJ.
Fw: RIA Chapter 5 for OMB 12/15/2011 08:10 PM

From: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cortney -

Here's the last Chapter of the revised RIA.

thanx!

bob

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. Leader, Energy Strategies Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division
Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-1045 Cell: (919) 306-2290 Fax: (919) 541-5450

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

********************************************************* DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

********************************************************* ----- Forwarded by RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US on 12/15/2011 08:04 PM

----- From: Amanda CurryBrown/RTP/USEPA/US To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Bryan Hubbell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Susan Anenberg/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim DeMocker/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 12/15/2011 07:59 PM Subject: RIA Chapter 5 for OMB

Hi Bob,

Here's the remaining chapter for OMB.

AmandaAmanda Curry Brown OAQPS/HEID/AEG

919.541.3808 CurryBrown.Amanda@epa.gov

Chapter 5_HealthWelfareCobenefits_1215 v2.docx
----

| (1)   | the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | August 13, 2010 | /s/ W. Page Ogden  |   |
|--------|-----------------|------------------------------|--------|
|   |            | W. Page Ogden                |   |
|   |            | Chief Executive Officer      |   |
STEVE DAINES COMMITTEES

MONTANA APPROPRIATIONS
' COMMERCE, SCIENCE AND
320 Haar Sinare Orrics BuKoING . TRANSPORTATION
“ral Lnited States Senate ener gsorces

INDIAN AFFAIRS ~

August 27, 2015

The Honorable Thomas E. Perez
Secretary

U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20210

Dear Secretary Perez,

[ write to express my concerns regarding the Department of Labor*s (DOL) proposed rule (RIN
1210-AB32) released on April 14, 2015. If issued in a final rule, current provisions would
exclude financial advisors from using exchange-traded equity options in their investment
retirement account portfolios. While we share a common goal of limiting unintentional risk-
taking with retirement funds, I believe the proposed rule, as written, fundamentally limits viable
equity option strategies used to simultaneously enhance retums and limit downside risk.
Ultimately, the disallowance of options in investment retirement accounts limits consumer
choice and jeopardizes the attainment of financial retirement goals. The DOL should not
disadvantage retirement accounts to non-retizement accounts by limiting the use of equity
options,

Therefore, L urge the DOL to not inhibit the use of equity options in IRAs. Equity options are a
commonly used investment instrument to accomplish risk/return objectives. In addition,
investors have been increasingly turning to the use of listed options in their [RAs in recent years,
According to the Option Clearinghouse Corporation, these individual investors currently account
for approximately fifteen percent of the total market volume. Montana is currently listed 49" of
states with the highest wages, and the proposed rule’s discriminate treatment of options further
obstructs investors’ ability to generate livable retirement savings.

As you well know, the number of’ Americans reaching retirement age is steadily increasing. In
2013 alone, the population of Montana at or above age 65 was approximately sixteen percent and
has expectedly grown. [ urge you to preserve the array of investment options currently available
to Montanans who are planning for retirement. [ appreciate your attention to my concerns, and I
look forward to monitoring developments on this matter.

Sincerely,

Bane

Steve Daines
U.S. Senator
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 4.17

                             DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE

                                                                 October 1, 2003

                                                                CDN$2,160,680.98

FOR VALUE RECEIVED CONSOLIDATED ENVIROWASTE INDUSTRIES INC. (the "UNDERSIGNED")
HEREBY PROMISES TO PAY ON DEMAND to JAMES E.H. DARBY (the "LENDER") or to his
order at 550 Lowry Lane, North Vancouver, British Columbia, V7G 1R3, the sum of:

            TWO MILLION ONE HUNDRED SIXTY THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED EIGHTY
           CANADIAN DOLLARS AND NINETY EIGHT CENTS (CDN$2,160.680.98)

(hereinafter called the "PRINCIPAL") with interest thereon calculated daily in
arrears and compounded monthly, both before and after demand, default and
judgment, and payable monthly from and after the date of this note on the last
day of each calendar month at a rate equal to the Prime Rate plus 3-1/2 percent,
as well after as before maturity, with interest on overdue interest at that same
rate.

"Prime Rate" means the annual rate of interest announced from time to time by
the Royal Bank of Canada as its reference rate then in effect for determining
interest rates on Canadian dollar commercial demand loans in Canada. At the date
of this note the Prime Rate is 4 -1/2 percent per annum.

This note is subject to the terms and conditions of the Loan Consolidation
Agreement made effective October 1, 2003 between the Lender and the Undersigned.

Executed by the Undersigned at the City of Abbotsford, in the Province of
British Columbia, the day and year first above written.

CONSOLIDATED ENVIROWASTE INDUSTRIES INC.

Per: "Doug Halward"                                          C/S
     ------------------------------
     Authorized Signatory
1210-AB32-2-1331.html[7/26/2015 1:49:59 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvx-7mil

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1827

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

If we are able to save for our retirement without the governments help, we are damn sure smart enough to spend

 our retirement money the way we want. Of course the government would rather spend it to help everyone who is

 on welfare, pay for the bastards in prison etc., etc., etc.,

We have worked very hard for our retirement and we want to spend it on us and our family. We know how to

 buy groceries, pay bills, make donations to the food banks and United Way. Keep out of our lives! We are not

 dependent on the government like you would like us to be. We are very good at governing ourselves along with

 our counties. We do not need to be policed and have a rule for everything in our life.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS,  CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS,  AND THE NOTES THERETO,  WHICH MAY BE FOUND ON PAGES 2
THROUGH 5 OF THE COMPANY'S  FORM 10-QSB FOR THE  PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         55,638
<SECURITIES>                                   95,447
<RECEIVABLES>                                  351
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               151,436
<PP&E>                                         34,701
<DEPRECIATION>                                 12,415
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 173,722
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          90,386
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    50,000
<COMMON>                                       3,138,102
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,104,766)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   173,722
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               77,968
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               170,350
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (92,382)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (92,382)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (92,382)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.17)
        



</TABLE>
NO. 07-07-0273-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	JUNE 5, 2008

		______________________________

	ROBERTO ANDRES MARTINEZ, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 187TH DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY;

	NO. 2004CR1620; HONORABLE RAYMOND ANGELINI, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Appellant, Roberto Andres Martinez, pleaded nolo contendere to the offense of Violating Sex Offender Registration.  Pursuant to a plea agreement, the trial court placed the appellant on deferred adjudication community supervision for a period of two years and a fine of $1,200.  The State subsequently filed a motion to Enter Adjudication of Guilt and Revoke Community Supervision.  When advised of the allegations against him, appellant initially pleaded “not true” to all allegations.   At a subsequent hearing, appellant entered a plea of “true” to several of the allegations.  As a result of his plea of true, the trial court assessed punishment of confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-State Jail Division for a period of two years.  We affirm.

	Appellant’s attorney has filed an Anders brief and a motion to withdraw.  Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed. 2d 498 (1967).  In support of his motion to withdraw, counsel certifies that he has diligently reviewed the record, and in his opinion, the record reflects no reversible error upon which an appeal can be predicated.  Id. at 744- 45.  In compliance with High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 813 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978), counsel has candidly discussed why, under the controlling authorities, there is no error in the trial court’s judgment.  Additionally, counsel has certified that he has provided appellant a copy of the Anders brief and motion to withdraw and appropriately advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response in this matter.  Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991).  The court has also advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response.  Appellant has not filed a response.

	By his Anders brief, counsel raises grounds that could possibly support an appeal, but concludes the appeal is frivolous.  We have reviewed these grounds and made an independent review of the entire record to determine whether there are any arguable grounds which might support an appeal.  See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005).  We have found no such arguable grounds and agree with counsel that the appeal is frivolous.

	Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is hereby granted1 and the trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

							Mackey K. Hancock

							           Justice

Do not publish.