alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 111 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 13
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 111

                          [Report No. 107-39]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8) to amend the Internal 
 Revenue Code of 1986 to phase out the estate and gift taxes over a 10-
                  year period, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 3, 2001

   Mr. Reynolds, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8) to amend the Internal 
 Revenue Code of 1986 to phase out the estate and gift taxes over a 10-
                  year period, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 8) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 
phase out the estate and gift taxes over a 10-year period, and for 
other purposes. The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. The 
amendment recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in 
the bill shall be considered as adopted. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further 
amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: 
(1) one hour of debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on Ways and Means; (2) the further amendment printed in the report of 
the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if offered by 
Representative Rangel of New York or his designee, which shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order, shall be considered 
as read, and shall be separately debatable for one hour equally divided 
and controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to 
recommit with or without instructions.

                                                  House Calendar No. 13

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 111

                          [Report No. 107-39]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8) to amend the Internal 
 Revenue Code of 1986 to phase out the estate and gift taxes over a 10-
                  year period, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 3, 2001

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Royal Air Force conducts first airstrikes in Syria
 
  By The UK Ministry of Defence
  **SOUTHWEST ASIA (Dec. 3, 2015)****—** Royal Air Force Tornado aircraft, as part of operations against Daesh, have flown their first missions over Syria.Last
 night parliament granted approval for the UK to extend their airstrikes
 to include Syria, as well as Iraq, as part of counter-Daesh coalition 
operations. Within hours, Royal Air Force Tornados flew their first 
offensive operation on terrorist targets inside Syria.Supported 
by a Voyager air refuelling tanker and a Reaper, and operating in 
conjunction with other coalition aircraft, the Tornados employed Paveway
 IV guided bombs to conduct strikes against six targets on an oilfield 
at Omar – one of the largest and most important oilfields to Daesh’s 
financial operations, representing over 10% of their potential income.Defence Secretary Michael Fallon said:
  We have come to the aid of France and responded to the call of the 
United Nations. This will take time but I am very pleased that a clear 
and decisive majority was attained to target the group, which is a 
menace to us here in the UK.  The terrorists depend for their 
revenue on the control of oil. Cutting off their finances is extremely 
important to degrading the terrorists, to undermining their campaign in 
Iraq, and to shrink their operations in eastern Syria. It is there that 
these terrorist attacks are being planned.The UK has played a 
crucial role in tackling Daesh to date but strike operations have been 
restricted to Iraq. Britain has trained more than 2,000 troops, 
contributed a third of surveillance flights to the Coalition and have 
conducted more than 380 strikes on targets in Iraq. Yesterday’s vote 
means that the RAF can now begin attacking the Daesh headquarters and 
their finances and supply routes in Syria.Britain has been asked
 by Coalition partners to join operations in Syria as the UK can provide
 high precision weapons which minimise the risk of civilian casualties 
and collateral damage.Tornado pilot and station commander at RAF Marham, Group Captain Richard Davies said:
  In the hundreds of air strikes that the RAF has carried out in Iraq, 
we have had absolutely no civilian casualties reported. The rules of 
engagement that our crews apply both in the air and by commanders on the
 ground mean that I am absolutely confident that that will continue to 
be the case with operations in Syria.
Editorial Note on Part 385
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 385.109 The compliance review. ( a ) The criteria used in a compliance review to determine whether a Mexico-domiciled carrier granted provisional operating authority under § 365.507 of this subchapter exercises the necessary basic safety management controls are specified in Appendix B to this part.
( b ) *Satisfactory rating.* If the FMCSA assigns a Mexico-domiciled carrier a Satisfactory rating following a compliance review conducted under this subpart, the FMCSA will provide the carrier written notice as soon as practicable, but not later than 45 days after the completion of the compliance review. The carrier's operating authority will remain in provisional status and its on-highway performance will continue to be closely monitored for the remainder of the 18-month provisional registration period.
( c ) *Conditional rating.* If the FMCSA assigns a Mexico-domiciled carrier a Conditional rating following a compliance review conducted under this subpart, it will initiate a revocation proceeding in accordance with § 385.111 of this subpart. The carrier's provisional operating authority will not be suspended prior to the conclusion of the revocation proceeding.
( d ) *Unsatisfactory rating.* If the FMCSA assigns a Mexico-domiciled carrier an Unsatisfactory rating following a compliance review conducted under this subpart, it will initiate a suspension and revocation proceeding in accordance with § 385.111 of this subpart.
# Gen. McKenzie assumes command of U.S. Central Command

/ Published March 29, 2019

March 29, 2019Release Number 20190329-01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla. -** U.S. Marine Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr. assumed command of U.S Central Command from Gen. Joseph L. Votel at a ceremony here Thursday. 

As commander, Gen. McKenzie will oversee military operations and theater security cooperation activities across a region that spans 20 nations, 4.6 million square miles and three strategic maritime chokepoints.

Acting Secretary of Defense Patrick M. Shanahan officiated the ceremony. During his remarks, he thanked Gen. Votel for his leadership and commended the CENTCOM team for their professionalism.

Addressing the more than 70,000 U.S. forces operating in CENTCOM's area of responsibility, Gen. McKenzie stressed the importance of building upon the successes of his predecessor.

"We know that even as we build upon the gains of the last few years and accomplishments in Syria the last few weeks, new challenges always await this command," Gen. McKenzie said. "I know that the battle-tested team at CENTCOM remains in the ready to do what has to be done."

Gen. McKenzie closed by saying, "I am excited to follow Joe Votel, to build upon the remarkable work he has done. It is an honor to join this team of dedicated professionals. It is good to be back and I am ready to continue the march. Semper Fidelis."

In his remarks, Gen. Votel emphasized partnerships and relationships fostered throughout the CENTCOM area of responsibility. "We have worked with our partners to improve capabilities, build resilience, enhance interoperability, deter our adversaries and safeguard our common interests,"

Gen. Votel said. "Our ships, our airplanes, our Soldiers and Marines, and our special operations forces all operate together. For the collective good."

Gen. McKenzie previously served as CENTCOM's director of strategy, plans and policy, and commanded U.S. Marine Forces, Central Command. Most recently, Gen. McKenzie served as director of the Joint Staff.

-30-
# Contents

Introductory Letter from Secretary of Defense William J. Perry

One: Roles in Base Reuse
Assuming Responsibility

Highlights

The Role of Community Leaders



The Role of State Officials

The Role of Federal Officials

Other Resources

Two: Reuse Overview 
Understanding the Process

Highlights

Reuse Planning



Disposal and Reuse Decision Making

Decision Implementation

Impacts of the Transition



Case Studies

Three: Local Redevelopment Authorities
Organizing for Success

Highlights

Contingency Planning



Structuring an LRA

Recognition



Four: The Base Redevelopment Plan
Charting a Course for Economic Recovery

Highlights

The Process



Resources



Five: Implementation
Working for a Sustainable Reuse

Highlights

The Transformation



Putting It All Together



Appendix

Section 1: Federal Resources

Section 2: State Resources

Section 3: National Resources

Section 4: Base Points of Contact

Section 5: Acronyms and Abbreviations



|Questions, comments, and requests for additional copies of this Guide may be directed to the Office of Economic Adjustment at (703) 604-6020.
This Guide is also available on the World Wide Web at http://www.acq.osd.mil/es/
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
Oct. 9: U.S. Military Conduct Airstrikes Against ISIL in Syria
 By U.S. Central Command News Release
  October 9, 2014 Release #20141010FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **TAMPA, Fla., Oct. 9, 2014 -** U.S. military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria Wednesday and today using bomber, fighter and remotely piloted aircraft to conduct five airstrikes. In Syria, five strikes south of Kobani damaged an ISIL training camp, destroyed an ISIL support building and destroyed two ISIL vehicles.  These strikes also struck one small ISIL unit and one large ISIL unit. To conduct these strikes, the U.S. employed U.S. bomber, fighter and remotely piloted aircraft deployed to the U.S. Central Command area of operations.  All aircraft exited the strike areas safely. U.S. Central Command continues to monitor the situation in Kobani closely.  Indications are that Kurdish militia there continue to control most of the city and are holding out against ISIL. The strikes were conducted as part of the President's comprehensive strategy to degrade and destroy ISIL.  The destruction of targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group's ability to lead, control, project power and conduct operations.
From: KLESACK, EDWARD [mailto:eklesack@cfiemail.com] 

Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 9:04 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject:

Office of Regulations and Interpretations

Employee Benefits Security Administration

U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Ave, NW

Washington, DC 20210

e-ORI@dol.gov

Ladies and Gentlemen:

On behalf of an individual producer, Registered Representative agent: I am writing to submit comments 

regarding the proposed regulation published by the Department of Labor’s Employee Benefits Security 

Administration (the Department) defining the term “fiduciary” in connection with the provision of 

investment advice under ERISA.

I thank you for the opportunity to comment on this regulation. I support the Department’s decision to 

review and update aging regulations. However, I am strongly concerned, as well as the balance of the 

industry, about the costs this proposal imposes on the investing community and the curtailment of 

options for individual workers planning their retirement. This proposal as it stands with few exceptions, 

just doesn’t make sense to me.

In my 33 years in the business, I have always been taught to put my client’s needs first with few 

exceptions I have found this to be true with my associates in this business.

Brokers and insurance sales people have been unfairly portrayed by proponents of the DOL Fiduciary 

Rule, specifically Mr. Obama and Senator Elizabeth Warren.

I strenuously object to this accusation as it simply is not true in the industry.

With this level of miss-information being portrayed by our elected officials it is clear to me that this 

cannot possibly be a good change for our client’s or the industry.

Thank you for your consideration .

Respectfully Submitted

Edward R. Klesack

CLU, LUTCF, MBA, RFC

Christi Franks

Assistant to Edward R. Klesack

1221 Trimble Road South, Bldg. A-3

Mansfield, Oh. 44907

PH: 419-756-9747

FAX: 419-756-0361

Supervisory Branch Address:

4114 Windsor Rd. 

Youngstown, Oh 44512

PH: 330-726-8812
Edward R. Klesack offers securities and advisory services offer to sell securities, which may be done only 

after proper delivery of a prospectus and client suitability is reviewed and determined. Information 

relating to securities is intended for use by individuals residing in OH, FL, MD, PA,KY,NV.

This e-mail and attachment(s) may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or exempt 

from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 

hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If 

received in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete/destroy the message and any copies 

thereof.

This e-mail was sent in accordance with US Code 47.5.11, section 227. We respect your privacy and 

pledge not to abuse this privilege. To stop future mailings, please respond by typing “remove” in your 

reply.
From: John Dockum [mailto:jfmfdockum@verizon.net] 

Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 5:14 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA; michelle.singletary@washpost.com

Subject: RIN1210-AB32

Dear Thomas Perez, Secretary of Labor

Retirement investment advice should be given with the clients' best interest first.

The client is often faced with having to make one of the most important financial decisions of 

his/her life. The number and complexity of choices involving future investment returns and tax 

consequences merit a review of the clients' assets, needs and aspirations, and 

descriptions/explanations by the adviser or broker/dealer of the available financial products that 

may best satisfy his/her needs.

AARP's concern about IRA investors is justified. All the options should be considered in order 

that the clients' choice(s) will be in his/her best interest rather than being simply "suitable".

Respectfully yours,

John Dockum

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. 

www.avast.com
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 177 (Thursday, September 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52394-52395]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4558]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Foreign Claims Settlement Commission

[F.C.S.C. Meeting Notice No. 6-07]


Notice of Sunshine Act Meeting

    The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, pursuant to its 
regulations (45 CFR Part 504) and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 
U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of 
meetings for the transaction of Commission business and other matters 
specified, as follows:

Date and Time: Thursday, September 20, 2007, at 1:30 p.m.

[[Page 52395]]


Subject Matter: Issuance of Amended Proposed Decisions and Amended 
Final Decisions in claims against Albania.

Status:  Open.
    All meetings are held at the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 
600 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. Requests for information, or advance 
notices of intention to observe an open meeting, may be directed to: 
Administrative Officer, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E 
Street, NW., Room 6002, Washington, DC 20579. Telephone: (202) 616-
6988.

Mauricio J. Tamargo,
 Chairman.
[FR Doc. 07-4558 Filed 9-11-07; 12:22 pm]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-P
Hillsborough,

Dec., 1894

#### Tilton, *Ap’t, v.*O’Connor, *Adm’r.*

The power oí the probate court oí the county in which a deceased person was last an inhabitant, to appoint an administrator of his estate, is not affected by the pendency of proceedings in another county for the appointment of an administrator there.

Appeal, from a decree of the judge of probate, appointing the defendant administrator of the estate of Mary E. Kelley, who died July 21, 1898, at East Kingston, while on a visit. She was last an inhabitant of Manchester, where she had real and personal estate. TJpon the petition of the plaintiff, one of her heirs, filed September 21, 1898, the judge of probate of Rockingham county appointed one Stearns administrator on the eleventh day of October. September 26, 1893, Hurd, another heir, petitioned the judge of probate of Hillsborough county for the appointment of an administrator. After a hearing upon this petition the defendant was appointed. The plaintiff alleged as a reason of appeal, that at the time of the filing of the petition in this proceeding a similar petition was pending in the probate court of Rockingham county. The court affirmed the decree, and the plaintiff'excepted.

*Eastman, Young O'Neill,*for the plaintiff

*Denis F. O’ Connor*and *John P. Bartlett,*for the defendant-

*Per Curiam.*
      ***

The *“*granting of administration on the estate of a person deceased shall belong to the judge of probate for the county in which such person was last an inhabitant.” P. S., c. 182, *s.*8. The fact, that when the petition for the appointment of an administrator was filed in the probate court of Hills-borough county, a similar petition was pending in the probate court of Rockingham county, is immaterial. Priority in the filing of the petition did not determine the question of jurisdiction. As the decedent was last an inhabitant of Hillsborough county, the probate court of that county was authorized to appoint an administrator of her estate.

*Exception*overruled.

Chase, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

See loot-note on page 22.
**Exhibit 31.1**

CERTIFICATION 

I, L. Leon Patterson, certify that:  

1.      I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc.;

2.      Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.      Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.      The registrant'sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a)    designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)    evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)    disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.      The registrant'sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant'sauditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or personsfulfilling the equivalent functions): 

(a)    all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and 

(b)    any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 10, 2004

/s/      L. Leon Patterson                          L. Leon PattersonChairman and Chief Executive OfficerPalmetto Bancshares, Inc.
#### Mary C. Hyde, Respondent, v. Abram Eckler, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to the defendant to answer in twenty days, on payment of the costs of this appeal and of the demurrer. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.;

Haight, J., not voting.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1259.html[7/22/2015 9:24:13 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jve-byy1

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1259

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: MICHAEL Ivie

General Comment

I am capable of planning and controlling my retirement fund. We don't need the government interfering.