alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 37.41 Construction of transportation facilities by public entities. ( a ) A public entity shall construct any new facility to be used in providing designated public transportation services so that the facility is readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities, including individuals who use wheelchairs. This requirement also applies to the construction of a new station for use in intercity or commuter rail transportation. For purposes of this section, a facility or station is “new” if its construction begins (*i.e.*, issuance of notice to proceed) after January 25, 1992, or, in the case of intercity or commuter rail stations, after October 7, 1991.
( b ) ( 1 ) Full compliance with the requirements of this section is not required where an entity can demonstrate that it is structurally impracticable to meet the requirements. Full compliance will be considered structurally impracticable only in those rare circumstances when the unique characteristics of terrain prevent the incorporation of accessibility features.
( 2 ) If full compliance with this section would be structurally impracticable, compliance with this section is required to the extent that it is not structurally impracticable. In that case, any portion of the facility that can be made accessible shall be made accessible to the extent that it is not structurally impracticable.
( 3 ) If providing accessibility in conformance with this section to individuals with certain disabilities (e.g., those who use wheelchairs) would be structurally impracticable, accessibility shall nonetheless be ensured to persons with other types of disabilities (e.g., those who use crutches or who have sight, hearing, or mental impairments) in accordance with this section.
[56 FR 45621, Sept. 6, 1991, as amended at 71 FR 63266, Oct. 30, 2006]
§ 526.2 U.S. production by foreign manufacturer. Each petition filed under section 503(b)(3) of the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act must contain the following information: ( a ) For each model type (as defined by the Environmental Protection Agency in 40 CFR part 600) planned by the petitioner to be sold in the United States (regardless of place of manufacture), and for each model year beginning with the year before the first one for which relief is sought by the petition through the last year covered by the petition, the following information based on the petitioner's current product plan and the assumption that the petition will be granted: ( 1 ) A description of the model type, including car line designation, engine displacement and type, transmission type, and average fuel economy;
( 2 ) U.S. sales projected for the model type;
( 3 ) The average percentage of the cost to the manufacturer of the model type which is attributable to value added in the United States or Canada, determined in accordance with 40 CFR 600.511-80, and the total manufacturing cost per vehicle; and
( 4 ) In the case of model types not offered for sale in the United States before the first year for which relief is sought in the petition or other model types for which expansions in production capacity are planned during the years covered by the petition, information (including any marketing surveys) indicating from where the additional sales will be captured. If sales are projected to be captured from U.S. manufacturers, the petition must provide an estimate of the employment impact on those manufacturers of the lost sales and the gain in employment for the petitioner and its U.S. suppliers.
( b ) The total number of persons employed in the United States by the petitioner, excluding non-motor vehicle industry related employees, for each model year covered by the petition and for the model year immediately prior to those years.
( c ) A description of how the petitioner's responses to paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section would differ if the petition were denied.
[47 FR 7248, Feb. 18, 1982, as amended at 59 FR 25576, May 17, 1994]
ISAF transfers security responsibility for districts in Logar
 By Capt. Justin Casey , 7th Engineer Battalion
  The Afghan National Security Force Color Guard drills at the Tranche 3 Ceremony at Camp Miawon, July 12.
 LOGAR PROVINCE, Afghanistan (July 24, 2012) — The Governor of Logar province, Assistant to the Ministries of Defense, members of Parliament, tribal elders, the 203rd Afghan National Army Corps commander and soldiers, and Afghan National Police commander and police were all in attendance for a ceremony at Camp Miawon to mark the official transfer of power of three districts within Logar province from the International Security Assistance Force to Afghan forces July 12. Afghan President Hamid Karzai announced the official launch of Transition Tranche 3 May 13, the third phase in a process to an Afghan self-sustaining state. Tranche 3 includes 122 more districts, including all provincial capitals and now more than 75 percent of the people of Afghanistan living in security areas controlled by Afghan National Security Forces. Key leaders from throughout Logar province, and members of ISAF and Afghan National Security Forces gathered at Camp Miawon to celebrate the transfer of power of three districts in Logar province to the control of ANSF. The mood was jovial as tribal elders, ANSF commanders, and members of Parliament greeted each other. Each welcomed the third stage of the transition whereby ANSF assume security responsibilities in the three northern districts of Logar province and they expressed their gratitude to ISAF for assistance.The Governor of Logar province expressed his thanks, “I am grateful to ISAF for the many years of support for ANA with weapons and training that helped in defeating the enemies of the people, but now with the transfer of power, a new ANA will emerge to care for its country.” Tranche 3 is the third of five tranches planned as ANSF progress toward taking full responsibility for security of Afghanistan. The 203rd ANA Corps commander accepts his new responsibility in Logar province, “I assure all the people of Logar that their security will be my priority and I can assure them they will be safe.” Tranche 3 marks the start of transition in each of Afghanistan’s 34 provinces.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fact Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jacqueline Danforth, President and Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  November 20, 2006

By:  /s/ Jacqueline Danforth

Name:  Jacqueline Danforth

Title:    President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal

Accounting Officer)
49–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 109–367 

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT 

TO THE SAME DAY CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED BY THE RULES COMMITTEE 

JANUARY 31, 2006.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mrs. CAPITO, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 654] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 654, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a twothirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is reported from 

the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions reported from the 

Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver to any special rule 

reported on the legislative day of February 1, 2006, providing for 

consideration or disposition of a bill to extend and modify authorities needed to combat terrorism, and for other purposes. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with REPORTS
#### § 219.206 FRA access to breath test results.

Documentation of breath test results must be made available to FRA consistent with the requirements of this subpart.

[87 FR 5734, Feb. 2, 2022]
Docket: EBSA-2010-0007 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in 

Retirement Plans 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0007-0001 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options 

Document: EBSA-2010-0007-DRAFT-0024 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: Mike 

General Comment 

I am concerned about the effects of inflation on annuities. My pension annuity is via the PBGC, 

and has lost ground to inflation since I retired. What protection would this new annuity have from 

inflation? The PBGC pension has none, and inflation is causing a problem for me. 

Can the central bank be prevented from printing away my pension/annuity? Can a COLA adjust 

be added to the new annuity (and the PBGC one). Inflation protection is my main concern with 

this new proposal. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: February 17, 2010 

Received: February 08, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80a8f6fd 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 2/17/2010
#### Frances A. Becker, Respondent, *v.*Ohio German Fire Insurance Company of Toledo, Ohio, Appellant, Impleaded with Others. Frances A. Becker, Respondent, *v.*The Law Fidelity and General Insurance Corporation, Limited, Appellant, Impleaded with Others. Frances A. Becker, Respondent, *v.*Acme Fire Insurance Company of Lisbon, Iowa, Appellant, Impleaded with Others. Frances A. Becker, Respondent, *v.*Anchor Fire Insurance Company of Des Moines, Iowa, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.

*Becker*v. *Ohio German F. Ins. Co.,*129 App. Div. 932, affirmed.

*Becker*v. *Law Fidelity & Genl. Ins. Corp., Ltd.,*129 App. Div. 932, affirmed.

*Becker*v. *Acme Fire Ins. Co.,*129 App. Div. 932, affirmed.

*Becker*v. *Anchor Fire Ins. Co.,*129 App. Div. 932, affirmed.

(Argued May 9, 1911;

decided May 30, 1911.)

Appeal in each of the above-entitled actions from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 27, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover upon a policy of fire insurance.

*570
      *Henry C. Quinby*for appellants.

*Frederick J. Moses, A. B. Steele, Isham Henderson*and *James W. Ferguson*for respondent.

Judgment in each action affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Chase and Collin, JJ. Absent, Hiscock, J.
Czech Republic Soldiers participate in nonlethal weapon training
 By Staff Sgt. Johnathan Hoover , 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cav Div
  Miles Sonn, law enforcement specialist contractor for 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cavalry Division, watches as a Soldier from the Czech Republic army operates the Fabrique Nacional 303 during nonlethal weapon training Dec. 14. (Photo by Staff Sgt. Johnathan Hoover)
 **PARWAN PROVINCE, Afghanistan –** The U.S. Army is re-emphasizing the use of nonlethal weapons and other countries are taking notice. The Czech Republic army took part in training on the implementation and proper use of nonlethal weapons, provided by members of the 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cavalry Division, for the first time Dec. 14 at Bagram Air Field, Afghansitan. It is useful to take part in this training, said Czech Republic army 1st Lt. Marek Krajcik, liaison officer for the Czech Republic army. Unfortunately, we have never had this type of training, he said. “This is our first training mission with an international security force,” said Miles Sonn, a law enforcement professional contracted to 2nd BCT. “This is the first time they are using this weapon system.” Sonn added that even though this was the first time the Czech army has used this weapon system, they are very positive, professional and believe in the weapon. Their leader believes this training is very beneficial for them so that they can have non-lethal options, said Sonn. “From my point of view, it’s the best solution to solve the crucial issue of how to handle crowds and things of that nature,” Krajcik said. “They were trained on the Fabrique Nacional 303 compressed air launcher,” said Sgt. 1st Class Brandon Stephens. This weapon provides the capability to save lives and get people to comply, making it safer for everyone. “They [Czech army] caught on quickly, learned the weapon system and are accurate with their shots,” said Stephens. Stephens, the brigade provost marshal officer for 2nd BCT, noted that even though they are classed as nonlethal, the weapon still has the capability to be lethal if used incorrectly. “Proper training on the minimum-safe distance for engagement will significantly reduce the risk of fatality when employing the weapon,” said Stephens. “Training on how and when to utilize the weapon will give the commander another tool to use.” “We are going the extra mile to train Soldiers to ensure that we do not cause any collateral damage,” Sonn said. “This training is important to Soldiers so they are capable of engaging the enemy and minimizing fatal effects,” said Stephens. “When used effectively by a well-trained and disciplined unit, it can be a combat multiplier.” Krajcik said they are planning on using the nonlethal weapons in future operations. Stephens and Sonn said they have received requests from various units to train them on nonlethal weapons.
NE W YORK , N Y

TYSON S CORNER , V A CHICAGO , I L STAMFORD,C T "ARSIPPANY , N J BRUSSELS , BELGIU M AFFILIATE : OFFICE S MUMBAI , INDI A KELLE YDRY E & WARRE N LL P ALIMITE D LIABILIT YPARTNERSHI P 305 0 KSTREET , N.W . SUIT E 40 0 WASHINGTON , D.C . 2000 7

(EOE ) 342-S.40 0 Ma y 18 , 201 0 FACSIMIL E (20a ) 3A2-B4-5 I www.kelleydrye.co m

DIREC TLINE . (202 ) 342-852 8 EMAIL : dfisher@keMeydry e co m

r — I <C i B y Han dDelivery Ms . Doroth y Y . Bear d Director , Offic e o f

Informatio n Service s Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 New Jerse y Avenue , S.E . M-30,RoomW12-14 0 , 1 Washington , D.C . 2059 0 • Re : Applicatio n o f

UP S Europ e S A an dUP S International , Inc . for Exemptio n an dAmendment , Docke t OST-2010-012 8 Dear Ms . Beard :

O n May 13 , 2010 , UP S Europ e S A an dUP S International , Inc . (th e "Applicants" ) fileda n Applicatio n fo

r a n exemptio n fro mth e provision s o f th e Department' s Orde r

No . 98-2-5 ("Sudan Order" ) s o a s t o permi t th e Applicant s t o operat e on e (1 ) one-wa y ai r freight forwardin g movemen t

t o Sudan t o transpor t

medicin e t o trea t

malaria . Th e Applicant s polle dal l person s serve dwithth e Applicatio n an dhereb y inform th e Departmen t

that n o part y ha s an y objectio n t o th e Application . Accordingly , th e Applicant s reques t that th e Departmen t

gran t th e Applicatio n a s soo n a s possible . Thank yo u very muc hfor

you r assistance . Sincerely , •^/^ Janiell e K . Fishe r Attorne y fo

r Unite dParce l Servic e

cc : Al l partie s (vi ae-mail ) Brett Kruge r (vi ae-mail )

DCOl/FISHD/412455. 1
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAsymptotic Waveform Evaluation (AWE) Technique for Frequency Domain Electromagnetic AnalysisThe Asymptotic Waveform Evaluation (AWE) technique is applied to a generalized frequency domain electromagnetic problem. Most of the frequency domain techniques in computational electromagnetics result in a matrix equation, which is solved at a single frequency. In the AWE technique, the Taylor series expansion around that frequency is applied to the matrix equation. The coefficients of the Taylor's series are obtained in terms of the frequency derivatives of the matrices evaluated at the expansion frequency. The coefficients hence obtained will be used to predict the frequency response of the system over a frequency range. The detailed derivation of the coefficients (called 'moments') is given along with an illustration for electric field integral equation (or Method of Moments) technique. The radar cross section (RCS) frequency response of a square plate is presented using the AWE technique and is compared with the exact solution at various frequencies.Document ID19970005000Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsCockrell, C. R.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Beck, F. B.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1996Subject CategoryCommunications And RadarReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:110292NASA-TM-110292Accession Number97N12987Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 522-33-11-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970005000.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
49–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 109–381 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 4167, 

NATIONAL FOOD UNIFORMITY ACT OF 2005 

MARCH 1, 2006.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. GINGREY, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 702] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 702, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4167, the National Food Uniformity Act of 2005, under a general debate rule. 

The rule provides one hour of general debate equally divided and 

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce. The rule waives all points of 

order against consideration of the bill. 

Finally, the rule provides that after general debate the Committee of the Whole shall rise without motion and no further consideration of the bill shall be in order except by a subsequent order 

of the House. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the bill 

includes a waiver of clause 4(a) of rule XIII (requiring a three-day 

layover of the committee report). The waiver is necessary because 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce filed its report (H. Rept. 

109–379) with the House on Tuesday, February 28, 2006 and the 

bill may be considered by the House as early as Thursday, March 

2, 2006. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARING
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Aero Sports Connection, Inc., exemption.  Docket ID FAA-2009-0344.
Congress of the United States

Washington, BE 20515
ashington 4237 BS

April 14, 2011

The Honorable Hilda L. Solis
Secretary of Labor

U.S. Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20210

BE 31 Hd BI YdV 1102

Dear Secretary Solis:

In our Congressional Districts there are private companies that sponsor an employee stock
ownership plan, or ESOP. They have a proven track record of providing good-paying local jobs,
while providing employees’ retirement savings.

Our constituent companies are concerned about the potential negative impact if DOL implements
its proposed regulation defining valuators of these companies’ ESOPs as ERISA fiduciaries.
(U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration, Definition of the Term
fiduciary, Federal Register, October 22, 2010, page 65263.)

We have serious concerns about this regulatory proposal. We believe it will significantly
increase the cost of operating and/or establishing an ESOP by forcing valuators to obtain special
ERISA fiduciary insurance, and in fact, many competent valuators will drop ESOP valuation
work, leaving less competition for companies to review before hiring a valuator.

In addition, an ESOP company’s expansion plans compared to non-ESOP companies would be
stymied as they would pay valuation costs in a due diligence process greater than non-ESOP
companies. The role of existing trustees and the “new” valuation fiduciaries will also be
needlessly blurred and confused.

We believe your Department - if it has found evidence of an incompetent valuation - has ample

authority to bring enforcement action against the ESOP plan trustees and fiduciaries under
current law.

The Labor Department’s proposal to treat persons making ESOP valuations as fiduciaries also
appears to conflict with current tax law. In the case of privately held securities, IRC section
401(a)(28)(C) requires the ESOP to engage an “independent appraiser” to value those shares in
order to be a qualified plan. By imposing a fiduciary duty on the valuator, their independence

and impartiality is lost as they are bound to act solely in the best interest of plan participants and
beneficiaries.

RECYCLED PAPER

D3u

GaAs


We support President Obama’s call to reduce onerous government regulations that stifle private
sector job growth. We believe the proposed DOL regulation runs afoul of the President’s
Directive and respectfully ask that you work with lawmakers and employers before moving
forward to ensure U.S. job creators are not negatively impacted by the Department's actions.

Thank you for your consideration of this important issue and we look forward to your timely
response.

Sincerely,

CHARLES BOUSTANY, JR ( GEOFF DAVIS (KY-04)
Member of Congress Member of Congress
#### Samuel S. Free, Respondent, v. Martha A. Fancher and others, Appellants.

Order denying motion to resettle case dismissed, without costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.385 Who bears the burden of proof in a PIE proceeding? ( a ) As the proponent of issuing a PIE, the initiating official bears the burden of proof.
( b ) This burden is to demonstrate, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the service agent was in serious noncompliance with the requirements of this part for drug and/or alcohol testing-related services or with the requirements of another DOT agency drug and alcohol testing regulation.
- Page 1
- 787615-1_Page_2.pdf
Page 1

- 787615-1_Page_3.pdf
Page 1
exv10w1



 




Exhibit 10.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration Statements filed on Form F-3
(File Nos. 333-84226, 333-128361, 333-129962 and 333-130040) and in any related Prospectus and (ii)
the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos: 333-11368, 333-11414, 333-13038, 333-13664,
333-13668, 333-14254, 333-14252, 333-81564, 333-92220, 333-108833 and 333-125075) of our report
dated March 24, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of ING
Groep N.V., included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2005.



Amsterdam, The Netherlands




March 24, 2006




Ernst & Young Accountants