alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1315.html[7/22/2015 10:22:12 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvg-lpwt

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1315

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: David Guller

General Comment

Please keep the governments hands off my 401k.

We need less regulation, not more. 

Thank you
[Crim. No. 3487.

Second Dist., Div. Two.

Sept. 24, 1941.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. ARTHUR JEROME JAYCOX, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellant.

Earl Warren, Attorney General, for Respondent.

*876THE COURT.

July 29, 1941, the transcripts on appeal were filed in this court. Thereafter, the time for filing briefs having elapsed, an order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed was issued, returnable September 24, 1941. On the latter date there was no appearance on behalf of appellant, either by brief or .otherwise.

Therefore, pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code, the judgment of the trial court hereby is affirmed.
----

| (1)   | the      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;    and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | August      7, 2008 | /s/      W. Page Ogden  |   |
|--------|---------------------|------------------------------|--------|
|   |                | W.      Page Ogden           |   |
|   |                | Chief      Executive Officer |   |
PETITION TO: SECRETARY THOMAS E. PEREZ, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Millions of Americans like me are counting on our 401(k) plans and individual retirement accounts for asecure
financial future — and we've worked hard to build and grow our savings. These plans often involve complex
financial decisions, so many of us have to use investment professionals for guidance. Loopholes in the current
law make it easy for some on Wall Street to take advantage of hardworking Americans and line their own
pockets with our retirement savings. Last year alone, hidden fees, unfair risk, and bad investment advice

iced Americans’ retit t savings b ch as $17 billion. {1’s tinie to close this loophole and ensure a
high standard that holds anyone who gives financial advice genuinely accountable for helping us choose the best
investments. As one of your constituents, I'm counting on you to work to close the loophole now.

be Kucde

eH)
. 6. Sue Rushing ai
HLOLSSSOFS 4862793778 George West, TX 78022-3765
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0613.html[7/21/2015 7:17:48 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-na6l

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0613

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Steve Anonymous

General Comment

I am smart enough to plan for my own retirement. We do not need big government!
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc.
(PNBC) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Todd D.
Fanning, Senior Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer of PNBC, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|    |                                                                                                                                                 
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies
 with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934; and                         
|    |                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained
 in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial
 condition and result of operations of PNBC.

|                                                 | 
|------------------------------------------------ | 
|/s/ Todd D. Fanning                              | 
|                                                 | 
|Todd D. Fanning                                  | 
|Senior Vice-President
 & Chief Financial Officer | 
|                                                 | 
|May 11, 2009                                     | 

34

---
Merrimack,

June, 1900.

#### Concord Land and Water Power Co. *v.*Clough.

Petition, under the flowage act, for the assessment of damages to the defendant’s land.

The plaintiffs excepted to the following statement in the argument for Clough: *“*My brother Sargent made an excuse. He said *628that if you dug down there when you were up there, you could have seen what was under the surface. I didn’t think of that. He did, it seems. ... If I had thought of that, I should have had it done.”

*Streeter, Walker & Hollis*and *Sargent & Niles,*for the plaintiffs.

*Martin & Howe,*for the defendant.

Peaslee, J.

The plaintiffs’ comment on the defendant’s failure to show the nature of the soil by inspection was an argument concerning the failure to pr.oduce available evidence, and was unobjectionable *(Mitchell*v. *Railroad,*68 N. H. 96, 116); while the defendant’s unsworn statement of the reason why such evidence was not produced vitiates the verdict. *Bullard*v. *Railroad,*64 N. H. 27.

*Verdict set aside.*

Chase and Pike, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.
EXHIBIT 24.8



POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, Edgar D. Jannotta do hereby appoint John W. Rowe and Randall E. Mehrberg, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name
and on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2006 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform
all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.



/s/ Edgar D. JannottaEdgar D. Jannotta




DATE:
February 7, 2007
§ 218.77 Remotely controlled switches. ( a ) After the operator of the remotely controlled switch is notified that a camp car is to be placed on a particular track, he shall line such switch against movement to that track and apply an effective locking device applied to the lever, button, or other device controlling the switch before informing the person in charge of the camp car occupants that protection has been provided.
( b ) The operator may not remove the locking device until informed by the person in charge of the camp car occupants that protection is no longer required.
( c ) The operator shall maintain for 15 days a written record of each notification that contains the following information: ( 1 ) The name and craft of the employee in charge who provided the notification;
( 2 ) The number or other designation of the track involved;
( 3 ) The date and time the operator notified the employee in charge that protection had been provided in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section; and
( 4 ) The date and time the operator was informed that the work had been completed, and the name and craft of the employee in charge who provided this information.
( d ) When occupied camp cars are parked on main track, a derail, capable of restricting access to that portion of the track on which such equipment is located, shall be positioned no less than 150 feet from the end of such equipment and locked in a derailing position with an effective locking device, and a warning signal must be displayed at the derail.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
 
                STATEMENTS RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
 
                 COMMUNITY PSYCHIATRIC CENTERS AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30,
                                        --------------------------------------
                                            1995         1994         1993
                                        ------------  ----------- ------------
<S>                                     <C>           <C>         <C>
Primary:
Average shares outstanding during the
 period................................   43,642,000   43,465,000   42,951,000
  (a) Stock options granted to
   employees and unpaid portion of
   shares issued to employees for
   exercise of stock options, based on
   the treasury-stock method using
   average market price................           **            *           **
                                        ------------  ----------- ------------
     TOTAL.............................   43,642,000   43,465,000   42,951,000
                                        ============  =========== ============
Net income (loss)...................... $(41,632,000) $10,220,000 $(24,892,000)
                                        ============  =========== ============
Earnings (loss) per share.............. $      (0.95) $      0.24 $      (0.58)
                                        ============  =========== ============
Fully diluted:
Average shares outstanding during the
 year..................................   43,642,000   43,465,000   42,951,000
  (a) Stock options granted to
   employees and unpaid portion of
   shares issued to employees for
   exercise of stock options, based on
   the treasury-stock method using the
   year-end market price, if higher
   than average market price...........           **            *           **
                                        ------------  ----------- ------------
     TOTAL.............................   43,642,000   43,465,000   42,951,000
                                        ============  =========== ============
Net income (loss)...................... $(41,632,000) $10,220,000 $(24,892,000)
                                        ============  =========== ============
Earnings (loss) per share.............. $      (0.95) $      0.24 $      (0.58)
                                        ============  =========== ============
</TABLE>
--------
 * As the dilutive common stock equivalents are less than 3% of the weighted
   average outstanding shares, they have not been included in the 1994
   computation of earnings per share as shown in the Consolidated Statement of
   Operations and Five Year Summary of Selected Financial Data.
 
** The impact of stock options is excluded from earnings (loss) per share as
   the impact of stock equivalents is anti-dilutive.
Editorial Note on Part 389
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 389 appear at 66 FR 49873, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 389.35 Petitions for reconsideration. ( a ) Any interested person may petition the Administrator for reconsideration of any rule issued under this part. The petition for reconsideration must be in English and submitted to the Administrator, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001, or electronically submitted using the docket for the rulemaking at *www.regulations.gov ,* and received not later than thirty (30) days after publication of the rule in the Federal Register. Petitions for reconsideration filed after that time will be considered as petitions for rulemakings filed under § 389.31 of this part. The petition for reconsideration must contain a brief statement of the complaint and an explanation as to why compliance with the rule is not practicable, is unreasonable, or is not in the public interest.
( b ) If the petitioner requests the consideration of additional facts, he/she must state the reason they were not presented to the Administrator within the prescribed time.
( c ) The Administrator does not consider repetitious petitions.
( d ) Unless the Administrator otherwise provides, the filing of a petition under this section does not stay the effectiveness of the rule.
[35 FR 9209, June 12, 1970, as amended at 53 FR 2036, Jan. 26, 1988; 72 FR 55702, Oct. 1, 2007; 80 FR 59073, Oct. 1, 2015; 85 FR 86849, Dec. 31, 2020]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1309.html[7/22/2015 10:11:38 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jve-40ef

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1309

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Liz Ownbey

General Comment

The United States of America government has no right to tell its citizens how to save or invest the money they

 made or will make under any circumstances. The government has over reached and over reached and it is out of

 control. The American

citizens are fed up with the ideology and actions of the present administration which is pushing on us in every

 direction. The 

continual disrespect for our Constitution is overwhelming with Obama as President. His Executive Orders are

 destroying us.
Exhibit 24-2

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOWN
ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, Carlos H. Cantu, do hereby appoint John W. Rowe and Randall E. Mehrberg, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to
sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2002 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.

|                     |  |                                  
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------
|                     |  | /s/CARLOS H. CANTUCarlos H. Cantu
|                     |  |                                  
|DATE: March 20, 2003 |  |                                  

---

QuickLinks
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

Respondent,

v.

DAVID CLAYTON, JR.,

Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 78874-4-I

DIVISION ONE

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

PER CURIAM — David Clayton challenges his judgment and sentence for 

third degree assault, contending that the sentencing court acted contrary to RCW 

10.82.090(1) in ordering Clayton’s non-restitution legal financial obligations to 

bear interest. But Clayton appears to be mistaken. A marked checkbox in the 

judgment and sentence indicates that “interest is waived,” and the minutes of the 

sentencing hearing confirm that “[a]ll interest is waived except with respect to 

restitution.” Nothing in the judgment and sentence indicates that Clayton will be 

assessed interest on non-restitution legal financial obligations.1

Affirmed.

 

1 The appellant’s statement of additional grounds challenges the effectiveness of his 

attorney’s representation, but the limited record on appeal does not support those claims.
No. 78874-4-I/2

2

FOR THE COURT:
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1440.html[7/23/2015 11:00:36 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvo-zbzx

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1440

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

The government has proven over and over again that they can not manage money. I have made sacrifices and

 planned my retirement around the fact that there will be no social security left for me when it is time. Do not in

 any way try to control how I spend MY money.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                     EXHIBIT 11
 
                                        Statement Re:  Computation of Per Share Earnings
 
 
 
 
 
                                               Three Months Ended          Six Months Ended
                                                      June                        June
                                               1998         1997           1998         1997
                                            __________   __________     __________   __________
<S>                                         <C>          <C>            <C>          <C>

Basic:
    Average shares outstanding:              1,767,064    1,765,569      1,767,064    1,764,932
 
    Net effect of the assumed exercise
    of stock options-based on the
    treasury stock method using
    average stock prices                             0        1,616              0        2,155
                                            __________   __________     __________   __________
             Total                           1,767,064    1,767,185      1,767,064    1,767,087
                                            ==========   ==========     ==========   ==========
Net income                                  $  588,798   $  667,045     $1,139,572   $1,249,435
                                            ==========   ==========     ==========   ==========
Net income per share                        $     0.33   $     0.38     $     0.64   $     0.71
                                            ==========   ==========     ==========   ==========
 
 
 
 
Diluted:
    Average shares outstanding:              1,767,064    1,765,569      1,767,064    1,764,932
 
    Net effect of the assumed exercise
    of stock options based on the
    treasury stock method using
    average market  price or period
    end market price, whichever is higher        2,212        1,616          1,981        2,176
                                            __________   __________     __________   __________
             Total                           1,769,276    1,767,185      1,769,045    1,767,108
                                            ==========   ==========     ==========   ==========
Net income                                  $  588,798   $  667,045     $1,139,572   $1,249,435
                                            ==========   ==========     ==========   ==========
Net income per share                        $     0.33   $     0.38     $     0.64   $     0.71
                                            ==========   ==========     ==========   ==========

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1 

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Charles E. Drimal, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of PrimeEnergy Management Corporation, the Managing General Partner of the Partnership, certify that:

- I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sterling Gas Drilling Fund 1982
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

August 12, 2003  
/s/ Charles E. Drimal Jr.   
-------------------------------------
  
Charles E. Drimal Jr   
Chief Executive Officer   
PrimeEnergy Management Corporation   
Managing General Partner