alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 330

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the benefits

of mentoring.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 23, 2002

Mr. OSBORNE (for himself, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mrs. ROUKEMA, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. KELLER,

Mr. FORD, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Mr. BEREUTER, Mrs. MORELLA,

Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Mr. FATTAH, Mrs. WILSON of New Mexico, Mr.

ROGERS of Michigan, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr.

CASTLE, Mr. FLETCHER, Ms. CARSON of Indiana, and Mr. FORBES) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

Education and the Workforce

JANUARY 23, 2002

Committee on Education and the Workforce discharged; considered under

suspension of the rules and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives

regarding the benefits of mentoring.

Whereas the future course of the United States depends on

its children and youth;

Whereas educated, confident, and nurtured children will

make our Nation stronger;

Whereas research has shown that mentoring measurably affects young people by increasing school attendance, im-
2

•HRES 330 ATH

proving rates of secondary school graduation and college

attendance, decreasing involvement with drugs and alcohol, and decreasing violent behavior;

Whereas considerable numbers of our Nation’s children face

difficult circumstances: 1 out of 4 children lives with only

1 parent; 1 out of 10 children is born to teenaged parents; 1 out of 5 children lives in poverty; and 1 out of

10 children will not finish secondary school;

Whereas mentoring is a proven, effective strategy to combat

such circumstances by matching a caring, responsible

adult with a child to provide guidance, stability, and direction to the child and to build the child’s confidence;

Whereas it is estimated that more than 16,000,000 children

in the United States need or want a mentor but mentoring programs nationwide serve at most 750,000 of

such children;

Whereas a coalition of mentoring organizations have designated January as National Mentoring Month;

Whereas the establishment of a National Mentoring Month

would emphasize the importance of mentoring and recognize with praise and gratitude the many individuals in

the United States who are involved with mentoring; and

Whereas the establishment of a National Mentoring Month

would encourage more individuals to volunteer as mentors, to the benefit of our Nation’s children: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that mentoring relationships can benefit
3

•HRES 330 ATH

1 America’s youth and result in improved school attendance

2 and academic achievement.

Æ
Exhibit 24.12



POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, Rosemarie B. Greco, do hereby appoint John W. Rowe and Randall E. Mehrberg, or either of them, attorney for me and in my
name and on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2003 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and
perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.



/s/ ROSEMARIE B. GRECORosemarie B. Greco






DATE: February 19, 2004
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Avatar Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert C. Shreve,
      President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




AVATAR
                    SYSTEMS, INC.**Dated:
                    August 14, 2008**By:
                /s/
                    Robert C. ShreveRobert
                    C. ShreveChief
                    Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1210-AB32-2-1514.html[7/26/2015 6:40:38 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwm-44c8

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2011

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Paulette Renee Broqueville

General Comment

I want small government with the Constitution as its guide. What part of the Constitution allows the US

 government to interfere with my saving money? Please stop interfering with We the People. I can save for my

 retirement myself.
Editorial Note on Part 387
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 387 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 387.323 Electronic filing of surety bonds, trust fund agreements, certificates of insurance and cancellations. ( a ) Insurers must electronically file forms BMC 34, BMC 35, BMC 36, BMC 82, BMC 83, BMC 84, BMC 85, BMC 91, and BMC 91X in accordance with the requirements and procedures set forth in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section.
( b ) Each insurer must obtain authorization to file electronically by registering with the FMCSA. An individual account number and password for computer access will be issued to each registered insurer.
( c ) Filings may be transmitted online via the internet at: *https://li-public.fmcsa.dot.gov .*
( d ) All registered insurers agree to furnish upon request to the FMCSA a copy of any policy (or policies) and all certificates of insurance, endorsements, surety bonds, trust fund agreements, proof of qualification to self-insure or other insurance filings.
[80 FR 63710, Oct. 21, 2015] Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 82 FR 5308, Jan. 17, 2017, § 387.323 was suspended, effective Jan. 14, 2017. At 86 FR 57072, Oct. 14, 2021, the suspension was lifted and an amendment was made to § 387.323. In that same document, § 387.323 was again suspended indefinitely.
Asset&.. Investment Advisors 

Lavon A. Williams 

INVESTMENT ADVISOR RErRESLNTATIVE 

210 Peters Street, Ste A.· Poteau, OK 74953 

Monday, August 10, 2015 

The Honorable Secretary of Labor Thomas Perez 

U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Ave., NW 

Washington, DC 20210 

Dear Secretary of Labor Perez: 

Phone: 918.647.5700 

Toll Free: 800.350.3702 

Fax; 918.647.5124 

Email: lwilliams@sagepointadvisor.com 

Website: www.aiawealthmgr.com 

I am concerned about the Department of Labor's Proposed Rule on Fiduciary Duty (the Proposal) to the 

Employee Retirement Income Security Act. The trusted relationship between Americans and their financial 

advisor is vital, and government shouldn't make it harder for people to save for retirement. I urge you to: 

-Call for additional Congressional hearings to fully examine the real and unintended consequences that this 

Proposal would have on consumers; 

-Explore and support a biparlisan legislative solution that effectively combines a best interest standard with a 

practical exemption from the prohibited transaction rules under the Proposal; and 

-Work with investment advisors, consumers, and various regulators to regulate retirement savings in a way that 

doesn't limit consumer choice but ensures a full range of advice is available to meet a retiree's financial goals. 

Consumers deserve access to education, planning, advice and product solutions as they prepare for retirement. 

However) this,P~oposal is too burdensome and would have significant impacts on consumers, including: 

-'niscouraging saving for retirement: By reducing access to personalized and holistic financial advice, the 

Proposal would shift the burden of complex retirement planning onto the very individuals the rnles are trying to 

protect. 

-Preventing people from gaining the peace of mind they need in retirement: By discouraging advisors from 

offering individuals many types of lifetime income guarantees that provide a steady stream of income 

throughout retirement. 

-Preventing small businesses from,taking care of their employees: By discouraging many small-business owners 

from offering IRA plans. ., . 

Thank you for your attention to this important matter and helping to ensure the full range of financial advice 

con.tinues to be available to all Americans. , · 

:· ' '' y 

~~~ Lavon A Williams 

2402 Redwood Ln 

Poteau, OK 74953 ., 

· .. ,. , .. 

' .. 

. •. 

Securities offered·through SagePoint Financial, Inc., member.Fl NRA and-SIPC .. ·Jnvestrilent ad~isory services-offered through Asset & lnv§ffement Advisors, Inc., 

a r,egistered invel)tment.advisor not affiliate.dwith SagePoint Financial, Irie
From: Carina Harper [mailto:cmhall50@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 7:13 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

Why does this government insist on sucking the life blood out of us hard working 

Americans? Do you not feel that we are capable enough to plan for our future 

retirement? I am perfectly capable thank you very much, and regardless, it is not 

the government's job or right to do so for me!

 

This is just another example of the government trying to encroach on our rights, 

take advantage of the general population's lack of knowledge of such schemes, and 

flat out STEAL our money to pay for things that you cannot afford. Did you not 

attempt this same scheme with Social Security? How's that one working out for you? 

I will never see a dime of the money I pay in to that system because it's already 

BROKE. You think I want to trust you with my life savings? HA! 

 

This government does not have a right to do this to us, and we are tired of this 

never ending stream of thievery that has just gotten worse with both our current 

Congress and White House administration. 

 

Myself and millions of other Americans cannot wait until Nov 2010 and Nov 2012. 

 

Carina Harper 

Fed Up Citizen 

Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®. See how.
Exhibit
10.14












Change
in Director Compensation






Non-employee
directors of PNM Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) receive their annual retainer
in the form of cash and stock-based compensation as determined by the Company’s
Board of Directors.   At the December 2008 Board meeting, the
Board approved increasing the 2009 annual retainer from the 2008 annual retainer
reported in the Company’s 2008 Proxy Statement by (1) increasing the amount of
restricted stock rights from 1,750 to 2,500 and decreasing the amount of options
from 1,050 to 1,000; (2) increasing the non-audit chair fees from $4,000 to
$5,000; and (3) increasing the meeting attendance fees from $0 to $1,750 per
Board meeting and from $1,250 to $1,500 per Board committee
meeting.  No changes were made to the annual cash retainer of $35,000
or to the Annual Audit and Ethics Committee Chair Fee of
$10,000.  Thus, the 2009 annual retainer for non-employee directors is
as follows:




Annual
      Retainer:
            
            $35,000,
      1,000 stock options* and 2,500 restricted stock rights*Annual Committee Chair
      Fee:
            
            $ 
      5,000 paid in quarterly installments (in addition to meeting
      attendance fees), except that the Annual Audit and Ethics Committee Chair
      Fee is $10,000Attendance
      Fees:
              (no
      attendance fee for teleconference meetings less than 1 hour in
      duration)
            
            $    1,750  per
      Board meeting
              $    1,500
      per Board Committee meeting




* Stock
options and restricted stock rights granted under the Company’s Omnibus
Performance Equity Plan (“PEP”) each vest in three equal annual installments
beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.  These awards
are typically made at the annual meeting of directors, unless the meeting occurs
during a black-out period for trading in the Company’s securities as specified
in the Company’s Insider Trading Policy.  As set forth under the
Company’s Stock Option Grant Policy, under those circumstances, the Board will
either (a) schedule a special meeting after the expiration of the black-out
period, (b) make awards pursuant to a unanimous written consent executed after
the expiration of the black-out period, or (c) pre-approve the equity awards
with an effective date after the expiration of the black-out
period.  The date of the awards is the date on which the Board
approves the awards, unless (i) the approval date is a non-trading day, in which
case the date is the immediately preceding trading date or (ii) in the case of
pre-approval during a black-out period, in which case the grant date is the
first trading date after the expiration of the black-out period.  The
exercise price of the stock option is equal to the closing price of the common
stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of the
grant.   The PEP prohibits option re-pricing.






Directors
are also reimbursed for any Board-related expenses.
#### § 583.1 Scope.

This part establishes requirements for the disclosure of information relating to the countries of origin of the equipment of new passenger motor vehicles.
Supplement to Appendix 3-B: General Land Cover Classes Derived from the Cropland Data Layer (CDL)

The Cropland Data Layers for CA were downloaded from the USDA Geospatial Data Gateway (http://datagateway. The metadata for the CDL were included in the downloads. Metadata are also available through http://www.nass.us Data accessed October, 2010

Crops256 - Matrix and All 256 - Table come from the USDA NASS metadata for the 2010 CDL in California. The cdl2010Matrix_CA worksheet was created from the metadata tables, adding crop groupings for analysis of the These results were further manipulated and summarized to create the summary tables in Appendix B.nrcs.usda.gov/). sda.gov/research/Cropland/metadata/meta.htm.

proposed groupings.
From: Scott Perryman [mailto:Scott@pmi.ac] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 6:54 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Cc: Sally Estey 

Subject: Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule

Mr. Fred J. Wong 

Employee Benefits Security Administration 

U.S. Department of Labor 

Office of Regulations and Interpretations Room N-5655 

200 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20210 

SUBJECT: Comments on the DOL Proposed Regulation – Definition of the Term 

"Fiduciary" (Federal Register, Volume 75, Number 204, Pages 65263-6578, October 22, 

2010, Proposed Regulation)

Dear Mr. Wong: 

My wife and I previously owned a business that was converted to a 100% ESOP on 

October 1, 2009. We as trustees and the ESOP Communication Committee are against 

requiring firms that provide ESOP appraisals be fiduciaries. 

Reasons to remove the requirement that ESOP appraisers are fiduciaries from the 

proposed DOL Regulations are as follows: 

1. Increased cost because firms performing appraisals would need to obtain 

additional and more expensive insurance, take additional measures to 

comply and manage increased risk. All associated costs would be passed on 

to the ESOP.

2. Higher cost due to reduced number of qualified appraisers. Many will simply 

opt out and the remaining appraisers will be in position to take advantage of 

a more restrictive market.

3. Trustees are already subject to fiduciary responsibilities and as such must 

take extra care in presenting information to the appraiser. This would create 

a gray area of who’s responsible for what and to what degree. Don’t allow 

insertion of yet another layer that will result in finger pointing and watered 

down responsibility all while reducing quality at increased cost.

4. Employees will maintain a higher level of trust and respect for the actions of 

trustees because the trustees will be held to a higher lever of accountability. 

Again no gray area, no finger pointing.

5. Where does it end? Will appraisers respond by requiring all council, 

consultants, statisticians, etc. be obligated to fiduciary responsibility as well? 

Guess who will pick up the tab.

6. Increased cost results in reduced pension funds for the employees. The very 

last dollars left at the end of any year after all other expenses have been paid 
go to the pension benefit of the employee, the ESOP. Increased fiduciary 

responsibility takes yet another serving out of that pot.

7. Trustees are aware of associated fiduciary responsibilities and as such are 

compelled to hire qualified and reputable third party appraisers. Trustees are 

also compelled to provide complete and accurate information to the 

appraiser. I would hate to se a “didn’t ask, didn’t tell” mentality arise because 

of the diminished responsibility of the trustee.

Sincerely, 

Scott Perryman

President 

Perryman Mechanical, Inc. 

514 Glide Avenue 

West Sacramento, CA 95691 

Ph: 916-371-8888 

Fx: 916-371-8990
-----Original Message-----

From: Jeff Clark [mailto:jeff@jeffnjulie.com] 

Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2015 2:17 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Please do NOT ban the selling of covered calls or the selling of cash covered puts in my retirement 

account. I have no objection to banning other types of options trading as they are too risky for me. 

However, selling covered calls and cash covered puts is a main stay of my conservative portfolio 

management of my retirement account assets.

Selling covered calls generates extra income and the only risk is that I sell my shares at a price I am 

happy to sell at. The same goes true for cash covered puts, I get extra income until I can buy a security 

at a price I like and am happy to buy at.

Thank you,

Jeff Clark

A Conservative Investor
p. 1 CBI C Contro l Numbe r 

## RECEIVE D OPPTCBiC 

# 35742 0
2013DEC2 Q A M G'O Q P.O

. Bo x331 , Millwood , V A 2264 6 (540 ) 837-160 2 

# Tas k Forc e
Decembe r 17 , 201 3 

# DE

C 17 201 3

B Y HAN D Documen t Contro l Offic e Offic e o f Pollutio n Preventio

n an dToxic s Roo m6428 U.S
. Environmenta

l Protection Agenc

y 120 0 PennsylvaniaAve. , N.W
. Washington , D C 2046

0 Re : Testin

g Consen t Orde r fo r Ethylen e Dichloride ; Interi mRepor

t (Docke t No
. OPPT-2003-0010

)

Enclose di n sextuplicat

e i s th e six-mont

h interi mrepor

t require dunde r th e Enforceabl

e Consen t Agreemen

t fo r Ethylen e Dichloride , 68 Fed
. Reg
. 3312 5 (Jun e 3 , 2003 ) (th

e "ECA") , a s amended

, describin

g th e statu s o f testin g conducte

do r t o b e conducte

dunde r th e ECA
. Pleas e d o no t hesitat e t o contac t m e i f ther e i s an y questio n abou t thi s status report .

Enclosures cc : JohnE
. Schaeffe

r W
. Caffe y Norman , Esq
. Dea r Sirs :

Sincerely ,
Pete r E
. Voytek , Ph.D
. Manage r

4812-4530-6641
.p . 2

C O 

# 5 I - c o C O o C M < N C M > > 3

- 3 C

O o C M C O T - V E 2 a. o C O C

O o C M o SI £ > o C

O o C M Q ) E C O u 0) Q C O 

### 5 C M o n E 0) o C O D I 

## r o a o t r

T 3
O e o U J

a) c o O E L C D E L
" D C ( 0 D ) C 

## B C O a. t r o C O U J a 

# > •

t r 

### o a U J o

t r H I c n a . > • o 3 « • a c < o U J 

### " S c o C O o ' S o E < E L U J

O ) c I P (0 C O I o X o C O > •a 

## 2 a

C ! 2 c • D C o 4- 1 C O k . C O e C O ZJ ) . c o O (0 • o £
U J w

c (0

< D E c o

C O c
B a ) C O o >

c c

C O 

### § < O O U J O H - 0 ) o « c « 2 0 ) S " E '" a E o C D i

_ •a o 

# s € f r

o £ - £

. 2 c E •J S n g 

### • 5 « - 9 4- i C 3 C CO °> c 

## " 5 E • 

# * ? 

# £

D ) C 

## 8 8

C M C M C

M C

M
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellant,

v.

PEMBROKE PINES PHYSICIANS ASSOCIATES, INC.,

a/a/o TONY CURRIE,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-0047

[July 1, 2021]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; John D. Fry, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 

062013SC012082AXXXCE and 062018AP018165AXCCE.

Sarah Lahlou-Amine, DeeAnn J. McLemore, and Charles W. Hall of 

Banker Lopez Gassler P.A., Tampa, Nancy W. Gregoire of Birnbaum, 

Lippman & Gregoire, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, and Kathryn M. Winkler of 

Kirwan Spellacy Danner Watkins & Brownstein, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, 

for appellant.

Mac S. Phillips of Phillips|Tadros, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, KUNTZ and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fisher Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Robert C. Bateman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 8, 2005



/s/ Robert C. BatemanRobert C. Bateman Senior Vice President Chief Financial Officer
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 8/13/15 

Received: August 11, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8khw-q8b8

Comments Due: August 28, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-3292

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: S Gurney

General Comment

Don't change how agents and planners get paid. Don't take away our incentive to help people 

make wise decisions with their money. Find different way to ensure that advisors are doing what 

is in the best interest of the client and not their own pocketbooks. There are honest advisors out 

there !!