alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Business and Economy    >Retail - Monthly    >FAQs    >Advance Monthly Retail FAQs
 Skip to looking for section Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  Advance Monthly Retail Trade Survey FAQs
  General FAQs
  General Questions Related to the Advance Monthly Retail Trade Survey
  Sample Revision FAQs
  Questions Related to the Advance Monthly Retail Sample Revision
  Weather FAQs
  Weather-Related Questions for the Advance Monthly Retail Trade Survey
 Last Revised: June 09, 2020


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0107

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL ALLEN ZEIMER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 18, 2021, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 7 2021

01/07/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0107
# U.S. Central Command Statement on the Investigation into the Attack on the Motor Tanker Mercer Street

/ Published Aug. 6, 2021
TAMPA, Fla., 
**Please note, statements made within the enclosed briefing slides "Iranian UAV Attack Against MOTOR TANKER MERCER STREET" are attributable to U.S. Navy Capt. Bill Urban, the CENTCOM spokesman.August 6, 2021Release Number 20210806-02FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEU.S. Central Command Statement on the Investigation into the Attack on the Motor Tanker Mercer StreetTAMPA, Fla. – Following the July 30, explosive unmanned aerial vehicle attack on the Motor Tanker (M/T) Mercer Street while transiting international waters off the coast of Oman, an expert explosive investigative team from the USS Ronald Reagan embarked the M/T to examine the evidence and interview the surviving crew members.The team found:1)      The M/T Mercer Street was targeted by two unsuccessful explosive UAV attacks on the evening of July 29. The crew reported the attacks via distress calls on the evening of July 29. Based on crew interviews, the investigative team found credible the reports of the attacks, which impacted the sea near the M/T Mercer Street.  Investigators found small remnants of at least one of the UAVs on Mercer Street that the crew had retrieved from the water, corroborating the reports.2)      The investigative team determined that the extensive damage to the Mercer Street, documented in the attached slides, was the result of a third UAV attack on July 30.  This UAV was loaded with a military-grade explosive, and caused the death of two crewmembers; the master of the ship, a Romanian citizen, and a United Kingdom national who was part of the security detail.3)      The explosive detonation following the UAV impact created an approximately 6-foot diameter hole in the topside of the pilot house and badly damaged the interior. Explosive chemical tests were indicative of a Nitrate-based explosive and identified as RDX, indicating the UAV had been rigged to cause injury and destruction.4)      Explosives experts were able to recover several pieces of this third UAV, including a vertical stabilizer (part of the wing) and internal components which were nearly identical to previously-collected examples from Iranian one-way attack UAVs. The distance from the Iranian coast to the locations of the attacks was within the range of documented Iranian one-way attack UAVs. Following an on-scene analysis, some of the material was transferred to U.S. Fifth Fleet headquarters in Manama, Bahrain and subsequently to a U.S. national laboratory for further testing and verification.5)      U.K. explosive experts were provided access to the evidence at the Fifth Fleet headquarters. Evidence was shared virtually with Israeli explosive experts. Both partners concurred with the U.S. findings.U.S. experts concluded based on the evidence that this UAV was produced in Iran.

Link to photos PDF-30-
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2664
ALLAN L. GANT, Doctor, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FOI OFFICER, U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of West Virginia, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (CA-96-507-5) Submitted: May 28, 1998 Decided: June 9, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Allan L. Gant, Appellant Pro Se. Carol A. Casto, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Allan L. Gant appeals the district court's order dismissing his action filed under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 552 (West 1996 & Supp. 1998), and the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 552a (West 1996 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gant v. FOI Officer , No. CA-96-507-5 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[109th Congress Public Law 116]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ116.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 2524]]

Public Law 109-116
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To direct the Joint Committee on the Library to obtain a statue of Rosa 
 Parks and to place the statue in the United States Capitol in National 
  Statuary Hall, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Dec. 1, 2005 -  [H.R. 
                                4145]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 2 USC 2131a note.>> PLACEMENT OF STATUE OF ROSA PARKS 
            IN NATIONAL STATUARY HALL.

    (a) <<NOTE: Deadline.>> Obtaining Statue.--Not later than 2 years 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Joint Committee on the 
Library shall enter into an agreement to obtain a statue of Rosa Parks, 
under such terms and conditions as the Joint Committee considers 
appropriate consistent with applicable law.

    (b) Placement.--The Joint Committee shall place the statue obtained 
under subsection (a) in the United States Capitol in a suitable 
permanent location in National Statuary Hall.

SEC. 2. <<NOTE: 2 USC 2131a.>> ELIGIBILITY FOR PLACEMENT OF STATUES IN 
            NATIONAL STATUARY HALL.

    (a) Eligibility.--No statue of any individual may be placed in 
National Statuary Hall until after the expiration of the 10-year period 
which begins on the date of the individual's death.
    (b) Exceptions.--Subsection (a) does not apply with respect to--
            (1) the statue obtained and placed in National Statuary Hall 
        under this Act; or
            (2) any statue provided and furnished by a State under 
        section 1814 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (2 
        U.S.C. 2131) or any replacement statue provided by a State under 
        section 311 of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2001 
        (2 U.S.C. 2132).

[[Page 119 STAT. 2525]]

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary to carry out this Act, and any amounts so appropriated shall 
remain available until expended.

    Approved December 1, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4145:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            Nov. 17, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 18, considered and passed Senate.
WEEKLY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS, Vol. 41 (2005):
            Dec. 1, Presidential remarks.

                                  <all>
```
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1269.html[7/22/2015 9:32:55 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jve-toeg

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1269

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Sherry Henderson

Address:

14884 Hopewell Rd

Alpharetta, GA, 30004

Email: sherry@oracle20-20.com

Phone: 770-475-0294

General Comment

How I retire is nobody's business. My retirement should be self directed.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 178 (Friday, September 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 52554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4579]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE


Sunshine Act Notice

    The Board of Directors of the Corporation for National and 
Community Service gives notice of the following meeting:

DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, September 19, 2007, 8:45 a.m.-10:15 a.m.

PLACE: Corporation for National and Community Service, 8th Floor, 1201 
New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20525.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

I. Chair's Opening Remarks.
II. CEO Report.
III. Committee Reports.
IV. Honoring Departing Board Members.
V. Public Comment.

ACCOMMODATIONS: Anyone who needs an interpreter or other accommodation 
should notify the Corporation's contact person by 5 p.m., Monday, 
September 17, 2007.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Rachel Needle, Office of the CEO, 
Corporation for National and Community Service, 10th Floor, Room 10205, 
1201 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20525. Phone (202) 606-6742. 
Fax (202) 606-3460. TDD: (202) 606-3472. E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3d4f5358585951587d5e534e135a524b">[email protected]</a>.

    Dated: September 11, 2007.
Wilsie Y. Minor,
Deputy General Counsel.
FR Doc. 07-4579 Filed 9-11-07; 4:45 pm]
BILLING CODE 6050-$$-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 90-449 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF ROBERT M. BOWMAN, Petitioner and Appellant, AND ROSE-MARIE BOWMAN, Respondent and Respondent.

APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, In and for the County of Missoula, The Honorable Edward McLean, Judge presiding.

COUNSEL OF RECORD: For Appellant: Terry A. Wallace, Missoula, Montana For Respondent: Darla J. Keck; Datsopoulos, MacDonald & Lind, Missoula, Montana

ed:

# C/ (' G d~ill tj& Submitted on Briefs: April 4, 1991 Decided: May 16, 1991

B ClerkJustice R. C. McDonough delivered the Opinion of the Court.
Robert W. Bowman appeals from an order of the Fourth Judicial District, Missoula County. This order enforced the parties' separation agreement and required appellant to pay the sum of $13,000, plus interest, to the respondent. The court also ordered appellant to pay the sum of $1,800, plus interest, for child support. On reviewing the appellant's arguments, it is clear that his contentions concerningabandonment of the separation agreement and thepropriety of the award of child supporthave been conclusively determined by thisCourt. See In reMarriage of Bowman (1987),226 Mont. 99, 733 P.2d 197. His reargument of these issues is therefore withoutmerit. Furthermore,appellant's contention that his fulfillment of the payment terms of the separation agreement is legally impossible issimilarly withoutmerit. Appellant ceased making payments, under that agreement, in July of 1985. At that timehewas still employed and fully capableof making the required payments. For the above reasons, there is no support for this appeal. It is dismissed and let remittitur issue forthwith. Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(c), Montana Supreme Court 1988 InternalOperating Rules, this decision shall not be cited as precedent and shallbepublishedby its filingas apublic document with the Clerk of this Court and by a report of its result toWest Publishing Company.WeConcur: 

### / Chief Justice
From: cbourdette@earthlink.net [mailto:cbourdette@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:34 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 24, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Christine Bourdette 

3434 SW Corbett Ave 

Portland, OR 97239
----

**EXHIBIT      32.2**

| (1)   | the                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section                13(a) or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | August                13, 2007 | /s/              William M. Salters  |   |
|--------|--------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                           | William                M. Salters         |   |
|   |                           | Chief                Financial Officer    |   |
§ 583.10 Outside suppliers of passenger motor vehicle equipment. ( a ) For each unique type of passenger motor vehicle equipment for which a manufacturer or allied supplier requests information, the outside supplier shall provide the manufacturer/allied supplier with a certificate providing the following information: ( 1 ) The name and address of the supplier;
( 2 ) A description of the unique type of equipment;
( 3 ) The price of the equipment to the manufacturer or allied supplier;
( 4 ) A statement that the equipment has, or does not have, at least 70 percent of its value added in the United States and Canada, determined under § 583.6(c);
( 5 ) For equipment which has less than 70 percent of its value added in the United States and Canada, ( i ) The country of origin of the equipment, determined under § 583.7(c); and
( ii ) The percent of its value added in the United States and Canada, to the nearest 5 percent, determined under § 583.6(c).
( 6 ) For equipment that may be used in an engine or transmission, the country of origin of the equipment, determined under § 583.8(c);
( 7 ) A certification for the information, pursuant to § 583.13, and the date (at least giving the month and year) of the certification.
( 8 ) A single certificate may cover multiple items of equipment.
( b ) The information and certification required by paragraph (a) of this section shall be provided to the manufacturer or allied supplier no later than 45 days after receipt of the request, or the date specified by the manufacturer/allied supplier, whichever is later. (A manufacturer or allied supplier may request that the outside supplier voluntarily provide the information and certification at an earlier date.)
( c ) ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, the information provided in the certificate shall be the supplier's best estimates of price, content, and country of origin for the unique type of equipment expected to be supplied during the 12 month period beginning on the first July 1 after receipt of the request. If the unique type of equipment supplied by the supplier is expected to vary with respect to price, content, and country of origin during that period, the supplier shall base its estimates on expected averages for these factors.
( 2 ) The 12 month period specified in (c)(1) may be varied in time and length by the manufacturer or allied supplier if it determines that the alteration is not likely to result in less accurate information being provided to consumers on the label required by this part.
( d ) For outside suppliers of engines and transmissions, the information and certification required by this section is in addition to that required by § 583.12.
[59 FR 37330, July 21, 1994, as amended at 64 FR 40781, July 28, 1999]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1378.html[7/23/2015 6:30:14 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvm-mu6m

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1378

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Irvin Evans

Address:

Mount Pleasant, SC,

Email: irvin.e.evans@saic.com

Phone: 843-860-5194

General Comment

The concept of fiduciary responsibilities encapsulated within professional 401K management by investment

 companies is well understood and enforced within current law. Expansions of the regulatory detail over this area

 are not needed or desirable. It is important that individual freedom of choice by the consumer and not regulatory

 control be the primary determinent of market forces. It is important that regulators allow citizens to shape their

 future without government shaping, influence or outright control.
1210-AB32-2-1361.html[7/26/2015 2:34:37 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvz-q4oj

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1857

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I am a disabled, professional RN who is very capable of deciding how to spend my retirement money that I

 worked very hard to save. I repeat MY RETIREMENT MONEY!!! Not yours. I won't tell you how to spend

 your money, if you don't tell me how to spend mine.
EXHIBIT 32.1





                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc.
("PNBC") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Tony J.
Sorcic, President & Chief Executive Officer of PNBC, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:


(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of PNBC.




     /s/ Tony J. Sorcic
---------------------------------------------------




Tony J. Sorcic
President & Chief Executive Officer

August 6, 2003


                                       22