alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 6/24/15 9:37 PM

Received: June 20, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jje-ipv7

Comments Due: July 06, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0322

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Evan Welch

General Comment

Dear DOL:

The majority of financial advisors I know - including all in our firm - act in the best interests of 

their clients at all times.

Many of us become very close to our clients: we are not only their advisors, but their friends as 

well. We support them

emotionally when they face the death of a loved one and other challenges, and we help them 

make prudent decisions so

that ultimately they are in as strong a financial position as possible. In short, we help clients live 

more fulfilling lives, while

reducing their dependence on the Government for financial security.

I support a uniform fiduciary standard for all; however, it appears that the current DOL proposal 

ultimately will restrict the 

delivery of advice, and diminish financial advisors' ability to provide the customized solutions 

that clients need. I believe that

trying to regulate ethics by cutting the range of options for investors is the wrong course; rather 

a focus on increasing the 

punishments for those who do not put their clients first is a better course.

Since the age of 13 I have been investing. One of the many lessons I have learned is that while 

fees are an important component

Page 1 of 2

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481b4b8c8&format=xml&show... 6/24/2015
of net performance, it is not even close to the only component. Indexing strategies work well for 

some asset classes and strategies,

but not well for others; and investors' decisions and behavior (e.g. asset allocation, savings 

rates, buying and selling based on 

a disciplined process instead of one based on emotion, etc.) are the most critical factors for their 

results.

Part of the DOL's mission is "To foster, promote, and develop the welfare of the wage earners, 

job seekers, and retirees." 

My opinion is that the current proposal will do the opposite by having a major unintended 

consequence: reducing access to 

retirement advice, services and investment options for small and mid-sized investors as 

financial advisors face enormous

liability and higher costs. In short, we no longer will be able to serve clients other than those 

who are "High Net Worth."

I hope you keep the above in mind as you debate the current proposal.

Sincerely,

Evan P. Welch, CFP, AIF

Partner

Chief Investment Officer

Antaeus Wealth Advisors, LLC

Page 2 of 2

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481b4b8c8&format=xml&show... 6/24/2015
#### § 543.1 Scope.

This part establishes procedures under section 605 of the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act (15 U.S.C. 2025) for filing and processing petitions to exempt lines of passenger motor vehicles from part 541 of this chapter, and procedures for terminating or modifying an exemption.
##### 



Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer
of CNA Financial Corporation
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
(As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  
    
    the Companys Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December
31, 2007 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ D. Craig MenseD. Craig MenseChief Financial Officer
#### Gaughan *v.*Home Life Insurance Company, Appellant.

April 19, 1915:

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

This case was argued with the appeal of Maiy Lawler against the same defendant in which an opinion was this day handed down, ante, p. 409. The appeals involved the same question and the decision here necessarily follows that rendered in the Lawler case.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 305 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 104
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 305

                          [Report No. 107-322]

    Providing for the consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 5, 2001

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Providing for the consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

    Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on the legislative 
day of Thursday, December 6, 2001, for the Speaker to entertain motions 
that the House suspend the rules relating to the following measures:
            (1) The bill (H.R. 3008) to reauthorize the trade 
        adjustment assistance program under the Trade Act of 1974.
            (2) The bill (H.R. 3129) to authorize appropriations for 
        fiscal years 2002 and 2003 for the United States Customs 
        Service for antiterrorism, drug interdiction, and other 
        operations, for the Office of the United States Trade 
        Representative, for the United States International Trade 
        Commission, and for other purposes.
                                                 House Calendar No. 104

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 305

                          [Report No. 107-322]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

    Providing for the consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            December 5, 2001

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 9/9/15 

Received: September 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8l0l-e2vh

Comments Due: September 24, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule- Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-5148

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

The government need not get involved in PRIVATE investments for IRA
#### § 553.13 Notice of proposed rulemaking.

Unless the Administrator, for good cause, finds that notice is impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, and incorporates that finding and a brief statement of the reasons for it in the rule, a notice of proposed rulemaking is issued and interested persons are invited to participate in the rulemaking proceedings under applicable provisions of Title 49.
-----Original Message----- 

From: oneofjessicas@yahoo.com [mailto:oneofjessicas@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 11:30 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Elena Horvath 

108 S Brown School Rd Apt K 

Vandalia, OH 45377
# November 3: Military airstrikes continue against ISIS terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published Nov. 3, 2017
Nov. 3, 2017Release # 20171103-01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**SOUTHWEST ASIA** – On Nov. 2, Coalition military forces conducted 13 strikes consisting of 15 engagements against ISIS terrorists in Syria and Iraq.In Syria, Coalition military forces conducted nine strikes consisting of nine engagements against ISIS targets.• Near Abu Kamal, one strike destroyed an ISIS line of communication.• Near Al Shaddadi, two strikes engaged two ISIS tactical units and destroyed an ISIS vehicle and damaged a heavy weapon.• Near Dayr Az Zawr, six strikes engaged four ISIS tactical units and destroyed an ISIS line of communication, a VBIED factory and an ISIS headquarters.In Iraq, Coalition military forces conducted four strikes consisting of six engagements against ISIS targets. Near Al Qaim, four strikes engaged three ISIS tactical units and destroyed two VBIED factories, an ISIS-held building, two fighting positions and an ISIS spotter location.Additionally, one strike consisting of one engagement was conducted in Syria on Nov. 1, 2017. Near Abu Kamal, one strike destroyed nine ISIS supply routes.These strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to destroy ISIS in Iraq and Syria.  The destruction of ISIS targets in Iraq and Syria also further limits the group’s ability to project terror and conduct external operations throughout the region and the rest of the world.This Coalition strike release contains all strikes conducted by fighter, attack, bomber, rotary-wing, or remotely piloted aircraft, rocket propelled artillery and ground-based tactical artillery.A strike, as defined in the Coalition release, refers to one or more kinetic engagements that occur in roughly the same geographic location to produce a single, sometimes cumulative effect in that location.For example, a single aircraft delivering a single weapon against a lone ISIS vehicle is one strike, but so is multiple aircraft delivering dozens of weapons against a group of ISIS-held buildings and weapon systems in a compound, having the cumulative effect of making that facility harder or impossible to use. Strike assessments are based on initial reports and may be refined.CJTF-OIR does not report the number or type of aircraft employed in a strike, the number of munitions dropped in each strike, or the number of individual munition impact points against a target. The information used to compile the daily strike releases is based on 'Z' or Greenwich Mean Time.-30-
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 28, 2017 

# Order

Clerk December 28, 2017

154622 (7 5 )

PATRICIA MERCHAND,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 154622

v COA: 327272

Ingham CC: 12

- 001343

- NH

RICHARD L. CARPENTER, M.D.,

Defendant

- Appellant,

and

MID

- MICHIGAN EAR, NOSE,

AND THROAT, P.C.,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of defendant

- appellant to extend the time

for filing his re ply brief is GRANTED. The reply brief will be accepted as timely filed if

submitted on or before January 5, 2018

.
119 STAT. 2288 PUBLIC LAW 109–106—NOV. 21, 2005

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4133:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 109–274 (Comm. on Financial Services).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):

Nov. 16, considered and passed House.

Nov. 18, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–106

109th Congress

An Act

To temporarily increase the borrowing authority of the Federal Emergency Management Agency for carrying out the national flood insurance program.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Flood Insurance Program Further Enhanced Borrowing Authority Act of 2005’’.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN BORROWING AUTHORITY.

The first sentence of subsection (a) of section 1309 of the

National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)), as

amended by the National Flood Insurance Program Enhanced Borrowing Authority Act of 2005 (Public Law 109–65; 119 Stat. 1998),

is amended by striking ‘‘$3,500,000,000’’ and inserting

‘‘$18,500,000,000’’.

SEC. 3. EMERGENCY SPENDING.

The amendment made under section 2 is designated as emergency spending, as provided under section 402 of H. Con. Res.

95 (109th Congress).

Approved November 21, 2005.

National Flood

Insurance

Program Further

Enhanced

Borrowing

Authority Act

of 2005.

42 USC 4001

note.

Nov. 21, 2005

[H.R. 4133]
Docket: EBSA-2010-0050 

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’ 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0001 

Definition of the Term Fiduciary 

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0007 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-26236 

Submitter Information 

Name: Michael W Klingenberg 

Address: 

8001 Winn Rd 

SPRING GROVE, IL, 60081 

Email: MKLINGENBERG@SCOTFORGE.COM 

Phone: 8156754222 

Organization: Scot Forge Company 

General Comment 

I will refrain from making an expansive comment on this proposal, and instead simply reference 

the comment, which we are in agreement with, that was submitted by the NCEO, an organization 

which we are a member. 

Other professional organizations and individuals have offered similar comments. Most feel that if 

this proposal is enacted it will result in fewer firms doing appraisals, and the costs of those 

appraisals increasing sharply. The most likely result will be a reduction in retirement funds 

available to participants in these plans, and a significant reduction in the number of new ESOPs 

created, which will also reduce private retirement accounts. We agree with those opinions. 

With very few bad appraisals being encountered in the past, the anticipated benefit of this 

proposal in reducing the number of these bad appraisals seems very small in comparison to the 

negative impact on the benefit that is provided by ESOP plans. 

Thank you for the opportunity to provide input on this issue. 

Michael W Klingenberg 

VP-CFO, Scot Forge Company

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: December 22, 2010 

Received: December 16, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80bb838b 

Comments Due: January 20, 2011

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/ContentViewer?objectId=0900006480bb... 12/22/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-20938

 

BESTWAY SYSTEMS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GULF FORGE COMPANY, ET AL.,

Defendants,

ELLWOOD QUALITY STEELS COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas

 

November 12, 1996

Before GARWOOD, DAVIS and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

After considering the argument of counsel, the briefs, and the

relevant portions of the record, this Court concludes that the

district court correctly rendered judgment for the carrier,

plaintiff-appellee Bestway Systems, Inc. (Bestway), against the

shipper, defendant-appellant Ellwood Quality Steels Company

(Ellwood). We are generally in agreement with the district court’s

findings of fact and conclusions of law, a copy of which is

attached hereto. The district court’s findings of fact are

essentially unchallenged. We note that the bills of lading were
 

1We have no disagreement with Thunderbird Motor Freight Lines,

Inc. v. Seaman Timber Co., Inc., 734 F.2d 630 (11th Cir. 1984),

relied on by Ellwood, but there the shipper did not sign or adopt

any bill of lading, and there was no other contract between the

shipper and the carrier.

2

prepared and signed by Ellwood and were furnished by it to Bestway

when Bestway picked up Ellwood’s goods. Typed in on the bill of

lading before Ellwood’s name is the word “shipper.” There is no

place on the bill of lading, in either the preprinted form portion

or the typed portion thereof, in which the name of the “consignor”

is to be stated; nor does anything on the bill of lading otherwise

indicate or suggest that the “shipper” or Ellwood was not the

consignor or that the “shipper” and the consignor might be

different entities. The only question presented is whether the

proper construction of the bills of lading, to which Ellwood

indisputably made itself a party, is that Ellwood is the consignor

therein. If so, as Ellwood concedes, its failure to sign the

section 7 disclaimer renders it liable to Bestway. We conclude, as

did the district court, that under the circumstances the only

proper interpretation of the bills of lading is that Ellwood was

the consignor therein.1 Accordingly, the judgment of the district

court is

AFFIRMED.
1210-AB32-2-1389.html[7/26/2015 3:39:52 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jw2-q3dq

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1885

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I can plan my own retirement. I mean no disrespect but more & more of our rights are being taken away, what

 happened to the land of the free?? Seems we dont have any say and do what we want to do anymore!! The rebel

 flag being taken down & MANY want it to stay..... that is CRAZY!!!! But again you do what you want instead

 of doing what is right. I have worked hard my whole life & all these changes haven't helped my family & I at

 all!!! It has only cost me MORE!! So now you are attacking my retirement too?! I understand everyone lives

 different. I guess you could say I am middle class & I am a good person that has lived my life to the best within

 my means. It's time to stop all this nonsense & make America great again. Do NOT pass this ridiculous

 retirement law too!
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 83

To amend title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of

1974 to provide for cost-of-living adjustments to guaranteed benefit payments paid by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Mr. ENGLISH (for himself and Mr. TRAFICANT) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To amend title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to provide for cost-of-living adjustments

to guaranteed benefit payments paid by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘ERISA Guaranteed

5 Benefits COLA Act of 2001’’.
2

•HR 83 IH

1 SEC. 2. COST-OF-LIVING ADJUSTMENTS FOR GUARANTEED

2 BENEFIT PAYMENTS MADE BY THE PENSION

3 BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION.

4 (a) SINGLE-EMPLOYER PLAN BENEFITS GUARAN5 TEED.—Section 4022 of the Employee Retirement Income

6 Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1322) is amended by

7 adding at the end the following:

8 ‘‘(g) The amount of the guaranteed monthly benefit

9 payable with respect to any participant pursuant to this

10 section shall be increased annually, effective with respect

11 to benefits payable after December of each year, by the

12 same percentage as the percentage by which primary in13 surance amounts are increased, effective for such Decem14 ber, under section 215(i)(2)(A)(ii)(II) of the Social Secu15 rity Act.’’.

16 (b) MULTIEMPLOYER PLAN BENEFITS GUARAN17 TEED.—Section 4022A of such Act (29 U.S.C. 1322a) is

18 amended by adding at the end the following:

19 ‘‘(i) The amount of the guaranteed monthly benefit

20 payable with respect to any participant pursuant to this

21 section shall be increased annually, effective with respect

22 to benefits payable after December of each year, by the

23 same percentage as the percentage by which primary in24 surance amounts are increased, effective for such Decem25 ber, under section 215(i)(2)(A)(ii)(II) of the Social Secu26 rity Act.’’.
3

•HR 83 IH

1 (c) AGGREGATE LIMIT ON BENEFITS GUARAN2 TEED.—Section 4022B of such Act (29 U.S.C. 1322b) is

3 amended by adding at the end the following:

4 ‘‘(c) The maximum amount payable under the pre5 ceding provisions of this section with respect to any partic6 ipant shall be increased annually, effective with respect to

7 benefits payable after December of each year, by the same

8 percentage as the percentage by which primary insurance

9 amounts are increased, effective for such December, under

10 section 215(i)(2)(A)(ii)(II) of the Social Security Act.’’.

11 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

12 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with

13 respect to benefits payable after December 2001.

Æ
<PAGE>   1

                COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                     Exhibit 21 - Schedule of Subsidiaries


As of May 31, 1999, the Company had the following active subsidiaries:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
      Wholly-owned subsidiaries of Comprehensive Behavioral Care, Inc.:     State of Incorporation
      -----------------------------------------------------------------     ----------------------
      <S>                                                                   <C>
      Comprehensive Behavioral Care, Inc.                                           Nevada
      Healthcare Management Services, Inc.                                          Michigan
      Healthcare Management Services of Michigan, Inc.                              Michigan
      Healthcare Management Services of Ohio, Inc.                                  Michigan
      Behavioral Health Management, Inc.                                            Michigan
      Comprehensive Health Associates                                               Puerto Rico

      Wholly-owned subsidiaries of Comprehensive Care Corporation, Inc.:
      ------------------------------------------------------------------

      Comprehensive Care Integration, Inc.                                          Delaware
      Care Institute                                                                California

      Affiliates sponsored by Comprehensive Behavioral Care, Inc.:
      -----------------------------------------------------------

      Comprehensive Provider Networks of Texas, Inc.                                Texas
      Comprehensive Innovations Institute                                           Texas
</TABLE>