alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fact Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jacqueline Danforth, President and Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  November 14, 2005

By:  /s/ Jacqueline Danforth

Name:  Jacqueline Danforth

Title:    President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal

Accounting Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 147 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 33
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 147

                          [Report No. 107-76]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2001

   Mr. Reynolds, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider reports from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day they are presented to the House is waived with respect to 
resolutions reported on the legislative day of May 24, 2001, providing 
for consideration or disposition of any measure to provide for 
reconciliation pursuant to section 104 of the concurrent resolution on 
the budget for fiscal year 2002, any amendment thereto, any conference 
report thereon, or any amendment reported in disagreement from a 
conference thereon.

                                                  House Calendar No. 33

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 147

                          [Report No. 107-76]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 23, 2001

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
-----Original Message----- 

From: mdscotto@gmail.edu [mailto:mdscotto@gmail.edu] 

Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 12:34 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

May 02, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Mike Scotto 

1154 E.56th St. Apt. 1 

Chicago, IL 60637
KEVIN LEE ELLIOTT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-3608

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 13, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Russell L. Healey, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Mark Graham Hanson, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Jennifer J. Moore and Matthew Pavese, 

Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., RAY and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
Editorial Note on Part 572
Editorial Notes: 1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 572.30 Incorporated materials. ( a ) The drawings and specifications referred to in this regulation that are not set forth in full are hereby incorporated in this part by reference. The Director of the Federal Register has approved the materials incorporated by reference. For materials subject to change, only the specific version approved by the Director of the Federal Register and specified in the regulation are incorporated. A notice of any change will be published in the Federal Register. As a convenience to the reader, the materials incorporated by reference are listed in the Finding Aid Table found at the end of this volume of the Code of Federal Regulations.
( b ) The materials incorporated by reference are available for examination in the general reference section of docket 74-14, Docket Section, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Room 5109, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590. Copies may be obtained from Reprographic Technologies, 9000 Virginia Manor Road, Beltsville, MD 20705, Telephone (301) 210-5600, Facsimile (301) 419-5069, Attn. Mr. Jay Wall. Drawings and specifications are also on file at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
[51 FR 26701, July 25, 1986, as amended at 61 FR 67955, Dec. 26, 1996]
ACKNLWLEDGEMENT



 Exhibit 10.22 
  
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 
  
 Each Lender executing a counterpart to this Acknowledgement hereby acknowledges that: 
  

	 	(a)	 	the waivers contained in Sections 1(a) and 1(b) of the First Amendment and Waiver dated as of March 9, 2004 (the “First Amendment”) are effective with respect to
charges resulting from the adverse judgment (the “Judgment”) described in the memorandum to the Muzak Lender Group, dated March 24, 2004, and the establishment of a reserve with respect thereto; and 

  

	 	(b)	 	no Default or Event of Default under Sections 7.1(a) and 7.1(c) of the Credit Agreement dated as of May 20, 2003 (the “Credit Agreement”), among MUZAK HOLDINGS LLC
(“Holdings”), MUZAK LLC as Borrower (the “Borrower”), the lenders from time to time parties thereto (the “Lenders”), BEAR, STEARNS & CO. INC. and LEHMAN BROTHERS INC., as Joint Lead Arrangers,
LEHMAN COMMERCIAL PAPER INC. and FLEET NATIONAL BANK, as Co-Syndication Agents, GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, as Documentation Agent and BEAR STEARNS CORPORATE LENDING INC., as Administrative Agent (“Administrative Agent”)
shall occur as a result of charges relating to the Judgment or the establishment of any reserve relating thereto for purposes of the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2003. 

  
 The Lenders hereby acknowledge the above as of March 26, 2004. 
  
 [Signature pages follow] 
  
  

 Acknowledgement 









			
	 	 	 MUZAK LLC,
     as
Borrower

	 	 	 
	 	 	 By:        /s/ Catherine Walsh    


	 	 	 Name:    Catherine Walsh
 Title:      Treasurer

	 	 	 

  

			
	 	 	MUZAK HOLDINGS LLC
	 	 	 
	 	 	 By:        /s/ Catherine Walsh    


	 	 	 Name:    Catherine Walsh
 Title:      Treasurer


  
  

 Acknowledgement 









			
	 	 	BEAR STEARNS CORPORATE LENDING     INC., as Administrative Agent and a Lender
	 	 	 
	 	 	 By:        /s/ Victor Bulzacchelli


	 	 	 Name:    Victor Bulzacchelli
 Title:      Authorized Agent


  
  

 Acknowledgement 









			
	 	 	 LEHMAN COMMERCIAL PAPER INC.,
 as
Lender

	 	 	 
	 	 	 By:        /s/ Frank P. Turner


	 	 	 Name:    Frank P. Turner
 Title:      Authorized Signatory


  
  
  

 Acknowledgement 









			
	 	 	 FLEET NATIONAL BANK,
     as
Lender

	 	 	 
	 	 	 By:        /s/ Kay H. Campbell


	 	 	 Name:    Kay H. Campbell
 Title:      Director


  
  
  

 Acknowledgement 









			
	 	 	 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL
     CORPORATION, as Lender

	 	 	 
	 	 	 By:        


	 	 	 Name:    
 Title:      



	

  
  

 Acknowledgement 









			
	 	 	 CANPARTNERS INVESTMENTS IV, LLC,
     as Lender

	 	 	 
	 	 	 By:        /s/ Mitchell R Julis


	 	 	 Name:    Mitchell R Julis
 Title:      Authorized Member


  
  

 Acknowledgement 









			
	 	 	 CANYON CAPITAL CLO 2004-1 LTD.,
     as Lender

	 	 	 
	 	 	 By:        /s/ Mitchell R Julis


	 	 	 Name:    Mitchell R Julis
 Title:      Managing Director


  
  

 Acknowledgement
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 18

- 00055

- CR

JAMES ALLEN JACKSON, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 273rd District Court Sabine County, Texas Trial Court No. CR1607301

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

A Sabine County jury convicted James Allen Jackson of continuous sexual abuse of Mary Doe, a child younger than fourteen. 1 In accordance with the jury’s assessment, Jackson was sentenced to life imprisonment.

Jackson also appeals from his convictions for aggravated sexual assault of a chi ld and continuous sexual abuse of Mary’s sister, Jane Doe

. Jackson has filed a single brief in which he

raises an issue common to all of his appeals. 2 He argues that the trial court committed reversible

error in admitting e

- mail communications with his a dult daughter.

We addressed this issue in detail in our opinion of this date on Jackson’ s appeal in cause

number 06

- 18

- 00054

- CR . For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude in this case that Jackson’s substantial rights were not affected by th e admission of the e

- mails. Accordingly, we overrule Jackson’s point of error on appeal.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Ralph K. Burgess Justice

Date Submitted: November 13, 2018 Date Decided: December 21 , 2018

Do Not Publish

1 Ori ginally appealed to the Twelfth Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 73 .001 (West 2013). We follow the precedent of the Twelfth Court of Appeals in deciding this case. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 41.3.

2 Jackson appeals from his conviction for (1) aggravated sexual assault of Jane in cause number 06

- 18

- 00053

- CR and (2) continuous s exual abuse of Jane in cause number 06

- 18

- 00054

- CR.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Alfacell  Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Robert D. Love,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: March 13, 2006

                                   /s/ Robert D. Love
                                   ------------------
                                   Name:   Robert D. Love
                                   Title:  Chief Financial Officer
                                           (Principal Financial Officer and
                                           Chief Accounting Officer)

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Alfacell  Corporation  and will be retained by Alfacell  Corporation
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 4.7    
    


Translation for information purpose only  


CAISSE DES DEPOTS ET CONSIGNATIONS  


Savings
Management
 Financial Management

I.F. Director

Réf. DFFE -2004 -32

Catherine LE CORRE 


Paris,
March 16, 2004 


By
letter dated March 5, 2004, you have requested the approval of Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations to extend
until May 31, 2004 (the "Extension") the waiver, approved in October 2003, to invoke, until March 31, 2004, its rights for certain Events of Default or Potential Events of Default
against Euro Disney S.C.A. or Euro Disneyland S.N.C. (the "Waiver"). 


I
am pleased to confirm the approval of the Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations of this extension and the terms and
conditions of this extension. 


This
extension is strictly limited to the Events of Default or Potential Events of Default expressly referred to in the waiver and shall not extend and shall not be construed as extending to a waiver
of any other Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations right not included in the Waiver. 


Yours
faithfully, 


Jacques
Ollivier 









QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.7
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10-6-3

STOCK OPTION UNDER THE
EXELON CORPORATION LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
(as amended and restated effective January 28, 2002)

GRANT INSTRUMENT

Pursuant to Section 5 of the Exelon Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan, as
amended and restated effective January 28, 2002 (the "Plan"), the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors has granted an option (the "Option") to
purchase the number of shares of common stock, without par value, of Exelon
Corporation ("Common Stock") as set forth below, subject to the terms and
conditions listed below, and such other terms and conditions contained in the
Plan.

Optionee:

Option Number :

Number of Shares Subject to Option:

<TABLE>
<S>                                             <C>
Grant Date:                                     January 28, 2002

Expiration Date:                                11:59 p.m. (CST) on January 27, 2012

Exercise Price (per share):                     $46.92

When Exercisable:                               Except as otherwise provided in Section 5(e) of the Plan
                                                and subject to the other terms and conditions of the
                                                Plan, this Option shall become exercisable on or after
                                                the dates set forth below (if the Grantee is employed by
                                                the Company on such dates) with respect to the indicated
                                                number of shares of Common Stock originally subject to
                                                this Option:
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      NUMBER OF SHARES FOR
                                                         WHICH OPTION
                                 Vesting Date(s):       IS EXERCISABLE
                                 ----------------       --------------
<S>                                                   <C>
                                January 28, 2003
                                January 28, 2004
                                January 28, 2005
</TABLE>

This Option is at all times subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the
Plan and as may be specified by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors from time to time.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 314 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 109
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 314

                          [Report No. 107-335]

      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

            December 13 (legislative day, December 12), 2001

 Mr. Diaz-Balart, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

    Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on the legislative 
day of Wednesday, December 19, 2001, for the Speaker to entertain 
motions that the House suspend the rules, provided that the object of 
any such motion is announced from the floor at least one hour before 
the motion is offered. The Speaker or his designee shall consult with 
the Minority Leader or his designee on the designation of any matter 
for consideration pursuant to this resolution.

                                                 House Calendar No. 109

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 314

                          [Report No. 107-335]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

            December 13 (legislative day, December 12), 2001

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
§ 542.1 Procedures for selecting new light duty truck lines that are likely to have high or low theft rates. ( a ) Scope. This section sets forth the procedures for motor vehicle manufacturers and NHTSA to follow in the determination of whether any new light duty truck line is likely to have a theft rate above or below the 1990/91 median theft rate.
( b ) Application. These procedures apply to each manufacturer that plans to introduce a new light duty truck line into commerce in the United States on or after September 1, 2006, and to each of those new lines.
( c ) Procedures. ( 1 ) Each manufacturer shall use the criteria in appendix C of part 541 of this chapter to evaluate each new light duty truck line and to conclude whether the new line is likely to have a theft rate above or below the 1990/91 median theft rate.
( 2 ) For each new light duty truck line, the manufacturer shall submit its evaluations and conclusions made under paragraph (c) of this section, together with the underlying factual information, to NHTSA not less than 15 months before the date of introduction. The manufacturer may request a meeting with the agency during this period to further explain the bases for its evaluations and conclusions.
( 3 ) Within 90 days after its receipt of the manufacturer's submission under paragraph (c)(2) of this section, the agency independently evaluates the new light duty truck line using the criteria in appendix C of part 541 of this chapter and, on a preliminary basis, determines whether the new line should or should not be subject to § 541.2 of this chapter. NHTSA informs the manufacturer by letter of the agency's evaluations and determinations, together with the factual information considered by the agency in making them.
( 4 ) The manufacturer may request the agency to reconsider any of its preliminary determinations made under paragraph (c)(3) of this section. The manufacturer shall submit its request to the agency within 30 days of its receipt of the letter under paragraph (c)(3) of this section. The request shall include the facts and arguments underlying the manufacturer's objections to the agency's preliminary determinations. During this 30-day period, the manufacturer may also request a meeting with the agency to discuss those objections.
( 5 ) Each of the agency's preliminary determinations under paragraph (c)(3) of this section shall become final 45 days after the agency sends the letter specified in paragraph (c)(3) of this section unless a request for reconsideration has been received in accordance with paragraph (c)(4) of this section. If such a request has been received, the agency makes its final determinations within 60 days of its receipt of the request. NHTSA informs the manufacturer by letter of those determinations and its response to the request for reconsideration.
[69 FR 17967, Apr. 6, 2004; 69 FR 34613, June 22, 2004]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Friday, October 20, 1995 (132), Para 132.7 Adjournment]
[Page 1571]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.132.7  adjournment

  The SPEAKER pro temore, Mr. PETRI, by unanimous consent and pursuant 
to the special order heretofore agreed to, at 6 o'clock and 36 minutes 
p.m., the House adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, October 24, 1995.
```
§ 553.27 Hearings. ( a ) Sections 556 and 557 of title 5, United States Code, do not apply to hearings held under this part. Unless otherwise specified, hearings held under this part are informal, nonadversary, fact-finding proceedings, at which there are no formal pleadings or adverse parties. Any rule issued in a case in which an informal hearing is held is not necessarily based exclusively on the record of the hearing.
( b ) The Administrator designates a representative to conduct any hearing held under this part. The Chief Counsel designates a member of his staff to serve as legal officer at the hearing.
§ 273.11 Public benefits. ( a ) *Connectivity.* The connectivity metric is the percent of passengers connecting to and from other Amtrak routes, updated on an annual basis.
( b ) *Missed connections.* The missed connections metric is the percent of passengers connecting to/from other Amtrak routes who missed connections due to a late arrival from another Amtrak train, reported by route and updated on an annual basis.
( c ) *Community access.* The community access metric is the percent of Amtrak passenger-trips to and from not well-served communities, updated on an annual basis.
( d ) *Service availability.* The service availability metric is the total number of daily Amtrak trains per 100,000 residents in a metropolitan statistical area (MSA) for each of the top 100 MSAs in the United States, shown in total and adjusted for time of day, updated on an annual basis.