FORM 10-QSB--QUARTERLY OR TRANSITIONAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                     THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                        Quarterly or Transitional Report



                   U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2002


[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


             For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-11935


                         CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX
      (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)



         California                                              94-2887133
(State or other jurisdiction of                               (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                              Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                       Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                   (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)


Check  whether the issuer (1) filed all reports  required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act  during the  preceding  12 months (or for such
shorter period that the  registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No___



<PAGE>



                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

a)

                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)
                       (in thousands, except unit data)

                                 March 31, 2002

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Assets
<S>                                                                         <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                $ 2,476
   Receivables and deposits                                                     727
   Restricted escrows                                                            12
   Other assets                                                                 746
   Investment properties:
      Land                                                   $ 11,635
      Buildings and related personal property                  91,201
                                                              102,836
      Less accumulated depreciation                           (53,632)       49,204
                                                                           $ 53,165
Liabilities and Partners' (Deficit) Capital
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                          $ 457
   Tenant security deposits payable                                             280
   Accrued property taxes                                                       519
   Other liabilities                                                          1,037
   Due to former affiliate                                                      270
   Mortgage notes payable                                                    59,154

Partners' (Deficit) Capital:
   General partner                                           $ (9,646)
   Limited partners (89,292 units issued and
      outstanding)                                              1,094        (8,552)
                                                                           $ 53,165


         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>
b)

                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                       (in thousands, except unit data)



                                                          Three Months Ended
                                                                March 31,
                                                        2002               2001
Revenues:
   Rental income                                       $ 4,081           $ 4,191
   Other income                                            350               280
   Gain on casualty                                         --               158
      Total revenues                                     4,431             4,629

Expenses:
   Operating                                             1,376             1,373
   General and administrative                              140               120
   Depreciation                                            897               863
   Interest                                              1,060             1,203
   Property tax                                            347               350
      Total expenses                                     3,820             3,909

Net income                                              $ 611             $ 720

Net income allocated to general partner                 $ 72               $ 85
Net income allocated to limited partners                   539               635
                                                        $ 611             $ 720

Net income per limited partnership unit                $ 6.04             $ 7.11

Distributions per limited partnership unit              $ --             $ 13.58

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


<PAGE>


c)

                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

            CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' (DEFICIT) CAPITAL
                                   (Unaudited)
                       (in thousands, except unit data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                     Limited
                                    Partnership    General      Limited
                                       Units       Partner      Partners       Total

<S>                                   <C>            <C>        <C>           <C>
Original capital contributions        89,292         $ --       $89,292       $89,292

Partners' (deficit) capital
   at December 31, 2001               89,292       $(9,718)      $ 555        $(9,163)

Net income for the three months
   ended March 31, 2002                   --            72          539           611

Partners' (deficit) capital
   at March 31, 2002                  89,292       $(9,646)     $ 1,094       $(8,552)

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>
d)
                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                 Three Months Ended
                                                                       March 31,
                                                                  2002        2001
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                              <C>          <C>
  Net income                                                     $ 611        $ 720
  Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
   by operating activities:
      Depreciation                                                  897          863
      Amortization of loan costs and discount                        22           24
      Casualty gain                                                  --         (158)
      Change in accounts:
       Receivables and deposits                                     287          100
       Other assets                                                (211)        (101)
       Accounts payable                                            (101)         (77)
       Tenant security deposits payable                             (20)          21
       Accrued property taxes                                      (109)         (13)
       Other liabilities                                            (70)         (96)
         Net cash provided by operating activities                1,306        1,283

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                           (372)        (542)
  Net withdrawals from (deposits to) restricted escrows             157           (4)
         Net cash used in investing activities                     (215)        (546)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Payment on mortgage notes payable                                (260)        (182)
  Distributions to partners                                          --       (1,375)
         Net cash used in financing activities                     (260)      (1,557)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents                831         (820)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                  1,645        2,172
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                      $ 2,476      $ 1,352

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                        $ 1,071      $ 1,178

At  December  31,  2001 and  March  31,  2002,  accounts  payable  and  property
improvements and replacements were adjusted by approximately $325,000.

At March 31, 2002,  accounts payable and property  improvements and replacements
were adjusted by approximately $288,000.

         See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>
e)
                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX

                  NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)


Note A - Basis of Presentation

The  accompanying   unaudited   consolidated  financial  statements  of  Century
Properties Fund XIX (the  "Partnership" or  "Registrant")  have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted  accounting  principles for interim financial
information  and  with the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB  and  Item  310(b)  of
Regulation  S-B.  Accordingly,  they do not include all of the  information  and
footnotes  required by generally  accepted  accounting  principles  for complete
financial statements. The general partner of the Partnership is Fox Partners II,
a California  general  partnership.  The general partners of Fox Partners II are
Fox Capital Management Corporation ("FCMC" or the "Managing General Partner"), a
California  corporation,  Fox Realty  Investors  ("FRI"),  a California  general
partnership, and Fox Partners 83, a California general partnership. The Managing
General Partner is a subsidiary of Apartment  Investment and Management  Company
("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust. In the opinion of the
Managing  General  Partner,  all  adjustments  (consisting  of normal  recurring
accruals)  considered  necessary  for a fair  presentation  have been  included.
Operating  results  for the three  month  period  ended  March 31,  2002 are not
necessarily  indicative  of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year
ending  December 31, 2002. For further  information,  refer to the  consolidated
financial  statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001.

Note B - Casualty Gain

In February 2000, one of the Partnership's investment properties, McMillan Place
Apartments,  incurred damages to its buildings as a result of a hail storm. As a
result of the damage,  approximately  $137,000 of fixed assets and approximately
$72,000 of  accumulated  depreciation  were written off resulting in a net write
off of approximately  $65,000. The property received  approximately  $223,000 in
proceeds from the insurance  company to repair the damaged units.  For financial
statement  purposes,  a casualty gain of  approximately  $158,000 was recognized
during  the three  months  ended  March 31,  2001 as a result of the  difference
between the proceeds received and the net book value of the buildings which were
damaged.

Note C - Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The Registrant has no employees and is dependent on the Managing General Partner
and its  affiliates for the management  and  administration  of all  Partnership
activities.  The  Partnership  Agreement  provides  for (i) certain  payments to
affiliates for services and (ii)  reimbursement of certain expenses  incurred by
affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.

During  the three  months  ended  March 31,  2002 and  2001,  affiliates  of the
Managing  General Partner were entitled to receive 5% of gross receipts from all
of the Registrant's properties as compensation for providing property management
services.  The Registrant  paid to such  affiliates  approximately  $228,000 and
$227,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, which
is included in operating expenses.

An  affiliate  of  the  Managing  General  Partner  received   reimbursement  of
accountable  administrative  expenses  amounting  to  approximately  $48,000 and
$42,000 for the three month periods ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively,
which is included in general and administrative expenses.

Pursuant  to  the  Partnership  Agreement,  for  managing  the  affairs  of  the
Partnership, the general partner is entitled to receive a Partnership management
fee  equal  to  10%  of the  Partnership's  adjusted  cash  from  operations  as
distributed.  Approximately  $137,000 in Partnership  management  fees were paid
along with the  distribution  from operations made during the three months ended
March 31, 2001. These charges are included in general partner distributions.  No
fees were paid during the three months ended March 31, 2002.

An  affiliate  of  the  Managing  General  Partner  has  made  available  to the
Partnership  a  credit  line  of  up to  $150,000  per  property  owned  by  the
Partnership.  The Partnership has no outstanding  amounts due under this line of
credit. Based on present plans, the Managing General Partner does not anticipate
the need to borrow in the near future. Other than cash and cash equivalents, the
line of credit is the Partnership's only unused source of liquidity.

Beginning in 2001, the  Partnership  began insuring its properties up to certain
limits through coverage provided by AIMCO which is generally  self-insured for a
portion of losses and  liabilities  related  to workers  compensation,  property
casualty and vehicle liability. The Partnership insures its properties above the
AIMCO  limits  through  insurance  policies  obtained  by  AIMCO  from  insurers
unaffiliated  with the Managing General  Partner.  During the three months ended
March 31, 2002 and 2001, the Partnership was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates
approximately  $187,000 and $203,000,  respectively,  for insurance coverage and
fees associated with policy claims administration.

Note D - Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purports  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class  of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  which are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. ("Insignia") and entities which were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged  into AIMCO.  The  plaintiffs  seek  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
On June 25, 1998, the Managing General Partner filed a motion seeking  dismissal
of the action.  In lieu of responding  to the motion,  the  plaintiffs  filed an
amended  complaint.  The Managing General Partner filed demurrers to the amended
complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December 14, 1999, the Managing  General  Partner and its affiliates  terminated
the  proposed  settlement.  In  February  2000,  counsel  for some of the  named
plaintiffs filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who
negotiated  the  settlement.  On June  27,  2000,  the  Court  entered  an order
disqualifying  them  from the case and an  appeal  was  taken  from the order on
October 5, 2000. On December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff
Cabraser  Heimann & Bernstein  LLP as new lead  counsel for  plaintiffs  and the
putative class.  Plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint on January 19, 2001.
On March 2, 2001,  the  Managing  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On July 10, 2001, the Court issued an
order  sustaining  defendants'  demurrer on certain  grounds.  On July 20, 2001,
Plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court's July 10, 2001 order
granting in part and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001,
Plaintiffs  filed a fourth amended class and  derivative  action  complaint.  On
September 12, 2001, the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration.  On
October 5, 2001, the Managing General Partner and affiliated  defendants filed a
demurrer to the fourth amended complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001.
On February 2, 2002,  the Court served its order  granting in part the demurrer.
The  Court has  dismissed  without  leave to amend  certain  of the  plaintiffs'
claims.  On February 11, 2002,  plaintiffs  filed a motion  seeking to certify a
putative  class  comprised of all  non-affiliated  persons who own or have owned
units  in  the  partnerships.   The  Managing  General  Partner  and  affiliated
defendants oppose the motion. On April 29, 2002, the Court heard argument on the
motion and ordered  further  briefing  after which time the matter will be taken
under submission. The Court has set the matter for trial in January 2003.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first amended  complaint.  The first amended complaint in the Heller action is
brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserts  claims for among other
things  breach  of  fiduciary  duty;  unfair  competition;   conversion,  unjust
enrichment;  and judicial  dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a
motion to  consolidate  the Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that
the Heller action was filed in order to preserve the derivative claims that were
dismissed  without  leave to amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated
July 10, 2001. On October 5, 2001, the Managing  General  Partner and affiliated
defendants  moved to strike the first  amended  complaint  in its  entirety  for
violating  the Court's July 10, 2001 order  granting in part and denying in part
defendants'  demurrer in the Nuanes action, or alternatively,  to strike certain
portions of the complaint based on the statute of limitations.  Other defendants
in the action  demurred to the fourth  amended  complaint,  and,  alternatively,
moved to strike the complaint. On December 11, 2001, the court heard argument on
the motions  and took the matters  under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the
Court  served  notice of its order  granting  defendants'  motion to strike  the
Heller complaint as a violation of its July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes action.
On March 27, 2002,  the plaintiffs  filed a notice  appealing the order striking
the complaint.

The Managing  General Partner does not anticipate that any costs,  whether legal
or  settlement  costs,  associated  with  these  cases will be  material  to the
Partnership's overall operations.

The  Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding  litigation that
is not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

<PAGE>


ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The  matters  discussed  in this Form  10-QSB  contain  certain  forward-looking
statements  and  involve  risks and  uncertainties  (including  changing  market
conditions,   competitive  and  regulatory   matters,   etc.)  detailed  in  the
disclosures  contained  in this  Form  10-QSB  and the  other  filings  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission made by the Registrant from time to time. The
discussion of the  Registrant's  business and results of  operations,  including
forward-looking  statements  pertaining  to such  matters,  does not  take  into
account the effects of any changes to the  Registrant's  business and results of
operations.  Accordingly,  actual  results  could differ  materially  from those
projected in the forward-looking  statements as a result of a number of factors,
including those identified herein.

The Partnership's  investment  properties consist of eight apartment  complexes.
The following  table sets forth the average  occupancy of the properties for the
three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001:

                                                   Average Occupancy
      Property                                      2002       2001

      Sunrunner Apartments (1)                      93%        96%
         St. Petersburg, Florida
      Misty Woods Apartments (2)                    89%        92%
         Charlotte, North Carolina
      McMillan Place Apartments                     95%        97%
         Dallas, Texas
      Vinings Peak Apartments (1)                   91%        94%
         Atlanta, Georgia
      Wood Lake Apartments                          90%        91%
         Atlanta, Georgia
      Plantation Crossing                           88%        87%
         Atlanta, Georgia
      Greenspoint Apartments (3)                    99%        95%
         Phoenix, Arizona
      Sandspoint Apartments                         94%        96%
         Phoenix, Arizona

(1)   The Managing  General  Partner  attributes  the decrease in occupancy to a
      softening of the local market.

(2)   The Managing  General  Partner  attributes  the decrease in occupancy to a
      favorable  home  buying  market that has caused a number of  residents  to
      break their lease early to purchase homes.

(3)   The  Managing  General  Partner  attributes  the  increase in occupancy to
      increased marketing efforts.

Results of Operations

The Partnership  realized net income of approximately  $611,000 and $720,000 for
the three  month  periods  ended  March 31,  2002 and  2001,  respectively.  The
decrease  in net  income  is due to a  decrease  in total  revenues  offset by a
decrease in total  expenses.  Total  revenues  decreased due to recognition of a
casualty  gain in 2001 and a decrease in rental  income  partially  offset by an
increase in other income.  Rental income decreased due to decreases in occupancy
at several of the Partnership's  investment  properties.  Other income increased
due to the collection of utility  reimbursements  and lease cancellation fees at
several of the investment properties.

In February 2000, one of the Partnership's investment properties, McMillan Place
Apartments,  incurred damages to its buildings as a result of a hail storm. As a
result of the damage,  approximately  $137,000 of fixed assets and approximately
$72,000 of  accumulated  depreciation  were written off resulting in a net write
off of approximately  $65,000. The property received  approximately  $223,000 in
proceeds from the insurance  company to repair the damaged units.  For financial
statement  purposes,  a casualty gain of  approximately  $158,000 was recognized
during  the three  months  ended  March 31,  2001 as a result of the  difference
between the proceeds received and the net book value of the buildings which were
damaged.

Total expenses decreased due to a decrease in interest expense. Interest expense
decreased  due to a decrease in the interest  rate on the  mortgage  encumbering
McMillian Place. On January 29, 1998, the Managing General Partner  successfully
negotiated a  modification  of the terms of the mortgage  encumbering  McMillian
Place.  The interest rate changed from 9.15% to a fixed rate of 325 basis points
plus the annualized yield on United States Treasury non-callable bonds (5.27% at
November 1, 2001 which is one year from maturity).

Included in general and  administrative  expense at both March 31, 2002 and 2001
are management  reimbursements to the Managing General Partner allowed under the
Partnership  Agreement.  In addition,  costs  associated  with the quarterly and
annual  communications  with  investors and  regulatory  agencies and the annual
audit required by the Partnership Agreement are also included.

As part of the ongoing  business plan of the  Partnership,  the Managing General
Partner monitors the rental market  environment of its investment  properties to
assess the feasibility of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing occupancy
levels and protecting  the  Partnership  from increases in expenses.  As part of
this plan, the Managing General Partner attempts to protect the Partnership from
the burden of  inflation-related  increases in expenses by increasing  rents and
maintaining a high overall  occupancy  level.  However,  due to changing  market
conditions,  which  can  result  in the use of  rental  concessions  and  rental
reductions to offset softening market conditions, there is no guarantee that the
Managing General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At March 31, 2002, the Registrant had cash and cash equivalents of approximately
$2,476,000 as compared to  approximately  $1,352,000 at March 31, 2001.  For the
three  months  ended  March  31,  2002,  cash  and  cash  equivalents  increased
approximately  $831,000 from the Registrant's  year ended December 31, 2001. The
increase in cash and cash equivalents is due to approximately $1,306,000 of cash
provided by operating activities  partially offset by approximately  $215,000 of
cash used in investing  activities  and  approximately  $260,000 of cash used in
financing activities. Net cash used in investing activities consisted of capital
improvements  and   replacements   partially  offset  by  net  withdrawals  from
restricted escrows maintained by the mortgage lender. Net cash used in financing
activities consisted of payments of principal made on the mortgages  encumbering
the  Registrant's  investment  properties.  The Partnership  invests its working
capital reserves in interest bearing accounts.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures  required at the  properties  to  adequately  maintain the physical
assets and other  operating  needs of the Registrant and to comply with Federal,
state, and local legal and regulatory requirements. Capital improvements planned
for each of the Registrant's properties are detailed below.

Sunrunner Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2002,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $19,000 of capital  improvements  consisting  primarily  of floor
covering replacements.  These improvements were funded from replacement reserves
and  operating  cash flow.  Approximately  $70,000  has been  budgeted  for 2002
capital  improvements  at  Sunrunner  Apartments  consisting  primarily of floor
covering,  appliance,  air  conditioning  unit and  water  heater  replacements.
Additional  improvements  may be  considered  and will  depend  on the  physical
condition of the property as well as replacement  reserves and anticipated  cash
flow generated by the property.

Misty Woods Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2002,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $36,000 of capital  improvements  consisting  primarily  of floor
covering  and  appliances  replacements.  These  improvements  were  funded from
replacement  reserves and operating  cash flow.  Approximately  $81,000 has been
budgeted  for 2002 capital  improvements  at Misty Woods  Apartments  consisting
primarily of floor covering and appliance replacements.  Additional improvements
may be considered  and will depend on the physical  condition of the property as
well  as  replacement  reserves  and  anticipated  cash  flow  generated  by the
property.

McMillian Place Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2002,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $35,000 of capital  improvements  consisting  primarily  of water
heater replacements,  office computers,  and floor covering replacements.  These
improvements  were funded from operating cash flow.  Approximately  $131,000 has
been  budgeted  for 2002 capital  improvements  at  McMillian  Place  Apartments
consisting primarily of floor covering  replacements,  interior decorating,  and
exterior painting.  Additional improvements may be considered and will depend on
the  physical  condition  of the  property as well as  replacement  reserves and
anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Vinings Peak Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2002,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $94,000 of capital improvements  consisting primarily of plumbing
upgrades,  wall coverings,  office equipment,  and floor covering  replacements.
These improvements were funded from operating cash flow.  Approximately  $97,000
has been  budgeted for 2002  capital  improvements  at Vinings  Peak  Apartments
consisting  primarily  of  floor  covering.   Additional   improvements  may  be
considered and will depend on the physical  condition of the property as well as
replacement reserves and anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Wood Lake Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2002,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $24,000 of capital  improvements  consisting  primarily  of floor
covering,  appliance  and water heater  replacements.  These  improvements  were
funded from  operating  cash flow.  Approximately  $76,000 has been budgeted for
2002 capital improvements at Wood Lake Apartments  consisting primarily of floor
covering.  Additional  improvements  may be  considered  and will  depend on the
physical  condition  of  the  property  as  well  as  replacement  reserves  and
anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Plantation Crossing Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2002,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $27,000 of capital  improvements  consisting  primarily  of floor
covering  replacement,   appliance  replacements,  wall  coverings,  and  office
computers.   These   improvements   were  funded  from   operating   cash  flow.
Approximately  $65,000  has been  budgeted  for  2002  capital  improvements  at
Plantation  Crossing  consisting  primarily of pool  upgrades,  wall  coverings,
resurfacing,   and  floor  covering  and  appliance   replacements.   Additional
improvements may be considered and will depend on the physical  condition of the
property as well as replacement  reserves and anticipated cash flow generated by
the property.

Greenspoint Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2002,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $46,000 of capital  improvements  consisting primarily of parking
area improvements, air conditioning,  plumbing replacements,  floor covering and
appliance replacements. These improvements were funded from operating cash flow.
Approximately  $139,000  has been  budgeted  for 2002  capital  improvements  at
Greenspoint   Apartments  consisting  primarily  of  floor  covering,   exterior
painting,  major landscaping,  air conditioning unit replacements,  and plumbing
improvements.  Additional  improvements may be considered and will depend on the
physical  condition  of  the  property  as  well  as  replacement  reserves  and
anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Sands Point Apartments

During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2002,  the  Partnership  completed
approximately  $54,000 of capital improvements  consisting primarily of plumbing
enhancements,  major landscaping, floor covering and appliance replacements, and
structural  improvements.  These  improvements  were funded from  operating cash
flow.  Approximately $149,000 has been budgeted for 2002 capital improvements at
Sands Point Apartments consisting primarily of floor covering replacements,  air
conditioning  unit  replacements,   signage,   plumbing  fixtures,   drapes  and
miniblinds.  Additional  improvements  may be considered  and will depend on the
physical  condition  of  the  property  as  well  as  replacement  reserves  and
anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

The additional  capital  expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available
from operations or from Partnership  reserves.  To the extent that such budgeted
capital improvements are completed, the Registrant's distributable cash flow, if
any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.

The Partnership's  current assets are thought to be sufficient for any near-term
needs  (exclusive  of capital  improvements)  of the  Partnership.  The mortgage
indebtedness of approximately  $59,154,000,  net of discount,  is amortized over
varying  periods with  required  balloon  payments  ranging from October 2002 to
September  2021.  The Managing  General  Partner will attempt to refinance  such
indebtedness  and/or sell the  properties  prior to such  maturity  date. If the
properties cannot be refinanced or sold for a sufficient  amount, the Registrant
will risk losing such properties through foreclosure.

Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement,  the term of the Partnership is scheduled
to expire on December 31, 2007. Accordingly,  prior to such date the Partnership
will need to either  sell its  investment  properties  or extend the term of the
Partnership.  If the Partnership is unable to extend its term, the ultimate sale
price of the investment properties may be adversely affected.

The Partnership  distributed the following amounts during the three months ended
March 31, 2002 and 2001 (in thousands except per unit data):

                  Three Months     Per Limited      Three Months     Per Limited
                     Ended         Partnership         Ended         Partnership
                 March 31, 2002        Unit        March 31, 2001        Unit

Operations            $ --             $ --            $1,375           $13.58

Future cash  distributions  will depend on the levels of net cash generated from
operations, the availability of cash reserves and the timing of debt maturities,
refinancings,  and/or  property  sales.  The  Partnership's  cash  available for
distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. There can be no assurance, however,
that the  Partnership  will  generate  sufficient  funds from  operations  after
required capital expenditures to permit distributions to its partners in 2002 or
subsequent periods.

In addition to its  indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interest in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates owned 50,213.66 limited partnership units
in the Partnership  representing  56.24% of the  outstanding  units at March 31,
2002. A number of these units were  acquired  pursuant to tender  offers made by
AIMCO or its  affiliates.  It is  possible  that  AIMCO or its  affiliates  will
acquire additional limited partnership  interests in the Partnership for cash or
in exchange  for units in the  operating  partnership  of AIMCO  either  through
private purchases or tender offers. Under the Partnership Agreement, unitholders
holding a majority of the Units are  entitled  to take action with  respect to a
variety of matters,  which would  include  voting on certain  amendments  to the
Partnership  Agreement and voting to remove the Managing General  Partner.  As a
result  of its  ownership  of  56.24% of the  outstanding  units,  AIMCO is in a
position to influence all such voting  decisions with respect to the Registrant.
When voting on matters, AIMCO would in all likelihood vote the Units it acquired
in a manner favorable to the interest of the Managing General Partner because of
its affiliation with the Managing General Partner.  However,  IPLP, an affiliate
of the Managing General Partner, is required to vote 24,811.66 of its Units: (i)
against any proposal to increase the fees and other compensation  payable by the
Partnership to the Managing General Partner and any of its affiliates;  and (ii)
on all other  matters  submitted by it or its  affiliates,  in proportion to the
votes cast by non tendering  unit holders.  Except for the  foregoing,  no other
limitations are imposed on IPLP's right to vote its Units.


<PAGE>


                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purports  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class  of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  which are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. ("Insignia") and entities which were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged  into AIMCO.  The  plaintiffs  seek  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
On June 25, 1998, the Managing General Partner filed a motion seeking  dismissal
of the action.  In lieu of responding  to the motion,  the  plaintiffs  filed an
amended  complaint.  The Managing General Partner filed demurrers to the amended
complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December 14, 1999, the Managing  General  Partner and its affiliates  terminated
the  proposed  settlement.  In  February  2000,  counsel  for some of the  named
plaintiffs filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who
negotiated  the  settlement.  On June  27,  2000,  the  Court  entered  an order
disqualifying  them  from the case and an  appeal  was  taken  from the order on
October 5, 2000. On December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff
Cabraser  Heimann & Bernstein  LLP as new lead  counsel for  plaintiffs  and the
putative class.  Plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint on January 19, 2001.
On March 2, 2001,  the  Managing  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On July 10, 2001, the Court issued an
order  sustaining  defendants'  demurrer on certain  grounds.  On July 20, 2001,
Plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court's July 10, 2001 order
granting in part and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001,
Plaintiffs  filed a fourth amended class and  derivative  action  complaint.  On
September 12, 2001, the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration.  On
October 5, 2001, the Managing General Partner and affiliated  defendants filed a
demurrer to the fourth amended complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001.
On February 2, 2002,  the Court served its order  granting in part the demurrer.
The  Court has  dismissed  without  leave to amend  certain  of the  plaintiffs'
claims.  On February 11, 2002,  plaintiffs  filed a motion  seeking to certify a
putative  class  comprised of all  non-affiliated  persons who own or have owned
units  in  the  partnerships.   The  Managing  General  Partner  and  affiliated
defendants oppose the motion. On April 29, 2002, the Court heard argument on the
motion and ordered  further  briefing  after which time the matter will be taken
under submission. The Court has set the matter for trial in January 2003.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first amended  complaint.  The first amended complaint in the Heller action is
brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserts  claims for among other
things  breach  of  fiduciary  duty;  unfair  competition;   conversion,  unjust
enrichment;  and judicial  dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a
motion to  consolidate  the Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that
the Heller action was filed in order to preserve the derivative claims that were
dismissed  without  leave to amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated
July 10, 2001. On October 5, 2001, the Managing  General  Partner and affiliated
defendants  moved to strike the first  amended  complaint  in its  entirety  for
violating  the Court's July 10, 2001 order  granting in part and denying in part
defendants'  demurrer in the Nuanes action, or alternatively,  to strike certain
portions of the complaint based on the statute of limitations.  Other defendants
in the action  demurred to the fourth  amended  complaint,  and,  alternatively,
moved to strike the complaint. On December 11, 2001, the court heard argument on
the motions  and took the matters  under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the
Court  served  notice of its order  granting  defendants'  motion to strike  the
Heller complaint as a violation of its July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes action.
On March 27, 2002,  the plaintiffs  filed a notice  appealing the order striking
the complaint.

The Managing  General Partner does not anticipate that any costs,  whether legal
or  settlement  costs,  associated  with  these  cases will be  material  to the
Partnership's overall operations.

ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

            a)    Exhibits:

                  None.

            b)    Reports on Form 8-K:

                  None filed during the quarter ended March 31, 2002.



<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES



In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.



                                    CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX


                                    By:   FOX PARTNERS II
                                          Its General Partner


                                    By:   FOX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
                                          Its Managing General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                          Patrick J. Foye
                                          Executive Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Martha L. Long
                                          Martha L. Long
                                          Senior Vice President
                                          and Controller


                                    Date: