alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-60019 Summary Calendar

ASAD MUSHTAQ Petitioner

v. MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A43 968 082
Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Asad Mushtaq, a native and citizen ofPakistan, petitions for reviewofthe order ofthe Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial ofhis application for a waiver ofinadmissibility pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1182(k). He argues that the BIA erred in holding that his father’s knowledge of Mushtaq’s inadmissibility at the time that Mushtaq entered the United States as a minor is imputed to Mushtaq, thereby disqualifying him from relief under § 1182(k). He also argues that the IJ erred United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D January 15, 2009 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 08-60019

2 in denying relief under § 1182(k) as a matter of disc retion. In dismissing Mushtaq’s appeal, the BIA found only that the imputation ofMushtaq’s father’s knowledge to Mushtaq was proper for purposes of § 1182(k), and it did not address the IJ’s alternative, discretion-based denial. Because this court generally reviews only the BIA’s decision, the issue whether the IJ erred in denying relief as a matter of discretion is not properly before us. See Mikhael v. INS , 115 F.3d 299, 302 (5th Cir. 1997). However, even if Mushtaq were to show that the BIA erred in imputing his father’s knowledge to him, remand to the BIA for a determination of the propriety of the IJ’s discretion-based denial would be necessary before thi s case could be decided. See Nakimbugwe v. Gonzales, 475 F.3d 281, 284-85 (5th Cir. 2007). Further, the Government is correct that if the BIA were to affirm the IJ’s discretion-based denial, this court would lack jurisdiction to review that denial pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii). See Ayanbando v. Chertoff , 517 F.3d 273, 276-77 (5th Cir. 2008) (holding that this court lacksjurisdiction to reviewdenials when the applicable statute specifies, as does § 1182(k), that relief is discretionary). Accordingly, before this court reaches the complex question whether Mushtaq’s father’s knowledge was properly imputed to Mushtaq, judicial economy dictates that we REMAND this case to the BIA for the limited purpose of determining whether the IJ erred in denying relief under § 1182(k) as a matter ofdiscretion. REMANDED
#### Catharine A. Field, Appellant, v. Martin Field, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, without costs. Opinion by

Brady, J.
-----Original Message-----

From: Deborah Kaiser [mailto:dlkaiser@me.com] 

Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 2:02 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

I would like to go on record as being a supporter of the fiduciary standard rule and fee-only planning. 

We think it is important for people to understand who profits from the recommendations they are 

receiving and that there are no incentives for financial planners in recommending products for the 

wrong reason...if the financial planner profits on recommendations that do not benefit the customer. 

Thank you for your consideration.

Deb Kaiser

KC, MO
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASIDNGTON, D. C. 

,~~"" "" "" """"\ 

u 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

lNG DOCr<ET 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2015-2443 

NA YELLI FIGUEROA 

Respondent Judge J.E. Sullivan 

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT/WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT 

Pursuant to a settlement reached by the parties and to the provisions of 14 C .F .R. 

§13.215, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), by counsel, hereby withdraws its 

Complaint dated July 23,2015. 

Respectfully submitted this 12th day of August, 2016. 

tJall Landers 

Enforcement Division, Southern Team 

1701 Columbia Ave. 

College Park, GA 30337 

email: ryan.landers@faa.gov 

Telephone: (404) 305-5200 (main) 

(404) 305-5206 (direct) 

(404) 305-5223 (fax) 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Notice of Settlement/Withdrawal of Complaint was sent: 

original and one copy via Federal Express to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl 000 

one copy via facsimile and Federal Express to: 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20, 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

facsimile: (202) 366-7536 

Scott B. Bennett 

The Bennett Law Center 

3377 SW 3rd Avenue 

Miami, FL 33145 

facsimile: (305) 648-2256 

.. 1\ IA.~7~~~Fv~~(. r: ,/::J_~ \ I' ) Jf 1 1 f··~ ···:~ v ·c< ,; 

~·"fiFF~\Nf. McDOWELL ... 

Legal ~~sis\ant 

offic;; of the Regional Counsel 

1 2 

Dated
From: Bremen, Ross A. [mailto:RBremen@nepc.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 2:46 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Fiduciary Definition Hearing

February 9, 2011 

Via E-mail: e-ORI@dol.gov

Office of Regulations and Interpretations 

Employee Benefits Security Administration 

Room N-5655 

U.S. Department of Labor 

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20210 

Attention: Fiduciary Definition Hearing 

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: 

NEPC respectfully requests the opportunity to participate in the Fiduciary Definition 

Hearing conducted by the U.S. Department of Labor. 

NEPC has been providing investment consulting services for traditional and 

alternative assets for over twenty-five years. We are the largest independent 

investment consulting firm in the industry, servicing 290 retainer clients with over 

$350 billion in assets. Of our clients, 111 have defined contribution plans, 

representing $72 billion in plan assets. We also work with 226 separate defined 

benefit plans representing $203 billion in plan assets. NEPC does not offer 

investment products, and our investment advice and recommendations are unbiased 

and without conflict. We accept our role as a fiduciary and serve the singular interest 

of plan sponsors and the participants they represent. 

Ross Bremen, CFA, Partner, will testify on behalf of NEPC. NEPC’s testimony will 

focus on the needs of plan sponsors and how a broadening of the fiduciary definition 

will impact the types of services provided to sponsors and the entities providing 

those services. In our view, plan sponsors can benefit from either a narrow or broad 

definition so long as there is greater clarity with respect to the definition and what 

the fiduciary designation offers a sponsor. As we are not attorneys, our testimony 

will focus on our 25 years of experience in the field and our interactions with both 

clients and the myriad of service providers. 

Thank you for consideration of our request. 

Sincerely, 

Ross A. Bremen, CFA
Editorial Note on Part 386
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 386 appear at 65 FR 7755, Feb. 16, 2000, and 88 FR 80182, Nov. 17, 2023.

§ 386.44 Request for admissions. ( a ) *Request for admission.* ( 1 ) Any party may serve upon any other party a request for admission of any relevant matter or the authenticity of any relevant document. Copies of any document about which an admission is requested must accompany the request.
( 2 ) Each matter for which an admission is requested shall be separately set forth and numbered. The matter is admitted unless within 15 days after service of the request, the party to whom the request is directed serves upon the party requesting the admission a written answer signed by the party or his/her attorney.
( 3 ) Each answer must specify whether the party admits or denies the matter. If the matter cannot be admitted or denied, the party shall set out in detail the reasons.
( 4 ) A party may not issue a denial or fail to answer on the ground that he/she lacks knowledge unless he/she has made reasonable inquiry to ascertain information sufficient to allow him/her to admit or deny.
( 5 ) A party may file an objection to a request for admission within 10 days after service. Such motion shall be filed with the administrative law judge if one has been appointed, otherwise it shall be filed with the Agency Decisionmaker. An objection must explain in detail the reasons the party should not answer. A reply to the objection may be served by the party requesting the admission within 10 days after service of the objection. It is not sufficient ground for objection to claim that the matter about which an admission is requested presents an issue of fact for hearing.
( b ) *Effect of admission.* Any matter admitted is conclusively established unless the Agency Decisionmaker or administrative law judge permits withdrawal or amendment. Any admission under this rule is for the purpose of the pending action only and may not be used in any other proceeding.
( c ) If a party refuses to admit a matter or the authenticity of a document which is later proved, the party requesting the admission may move for an award of expenses incurred in making the proof. Such a motion shall be granted unless there was a good reason for failure to admit.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 4.2    
    


Translation for information purpose only  


CAISSE DES DEPOTS ET CONSIGNATIONS  


Savings
Management
 Financial Management

I.F. Director

Réf. DFFE/JO/CLC/IG-2003-198

Catherine LE CORRE 


Paris,
October 23, 2003 


        By
letter dated October 17, 2003, you have requested the approval of  Caisse des Dépôts et
Consignations to waive its rights to invoke certain Events of Default or Potential Events of Default against Euro Disney S.C.A. or Euro Disneyland S.N.C. (the "Waiver"). 


        I
am pleased to confirm the approval of  Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations of this waiver and the terms and
conditions of this waiver. 


        This
waiver is strictly limited to the Events of Default or Potential Events of Default expressly referred to in the Waiver and shall not extend and shall not be construed as extending
to a waiver of any other  Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations right not included in the Waiver. 


Yours
faithfully, 


Jacques Ollivier

Savings Management Director 









QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.2
<PAGE>

                 COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES



                       Exhibit 23 - Consent of Eisner, LLP



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8 No. 33-43841, No. 33-27213, and No. 333-15929) of our report dated
August 2, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Comprehensive Care Corporation and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended May 31, 2002.


/s/ Eisner, LLP
New York, New York
August 23, 2002



                                       42
1210-AB32-2-1383.html[7/26/2015 3:39:50 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jw1-synj

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1879

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: D B

General Comment

You don't walk in my shoes so how do yu know what I need for my retirement? can I determine what you should

 eat or do when You retire? 

YOU HAVE KNOW IDEA WHAT EVERY PERSON OR GROUP OF PERSONS RQUIRE, OR ARE YOU

 PLAYING god?
#### § 551.37 Language of communications.

Communications and attachments thereto shall be in English. Any matter written in a foreign language will be considered only if accompanied by a translation into English. A translation shall bear a certificate by the translator certifying that he is qualified to make the translation; that the translation is complete except as otherwise clearly indicated; and that it is accurate to the best of the translator's knowledge and belief. The translator shall sign the certificate in ink and state his full legal name, occupation, and address.
From: Paul Burich [mailto:pburich@serus.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 6:47 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

How about you keep your corrupt, filthy hands out of the private sector instead?

We all know how innocuous “optional” programs turn into mandatory programs under the

beneficent eye of the federal government.

How about spending about $2 trillion less each year and running the government the way I run

my household...with a BALANCED BUDGET. That way you won’t need massive sales of treasury

bonds to yourself!

Paul Burich

Milpitas, CA
<TABLE> <S> <C>





<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000707604
<NAME> BRITTON & KOONTZ CAPITAL CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       6,136,921
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     156,778,159
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,000,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  4,207,244
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      50,804,354
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        49,738,268
<LOANS>                                    143,498,024
<ALLOWANCE>                                    910,043
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             219,241,123
<DEPOSITS>                                 182,596,133
<SHORT-TERM>                                12,750,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          3,298,352
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,417,660
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,178,978
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             219,241,123
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,122,566
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              951,713
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             4,074,279
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,586,965
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,852,808
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,221,471
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   70,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,745,545
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                918,061
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     602,354
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   602,354
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.09
<LOANS-NON>                                    387,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   154,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               835,576
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   33,173
<RECOVERIES>                                    37,640
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              910,043
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0




</TABLE>
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 997

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to waive the part B premium

penalty for individuals entitled to TRICARE health benefits as a member

or former member of the uniformed services, or dependent of such

a member or former member, and to amend title 10, United States

Code, to waive the TRICARE requirement for enrollment in Medicare

part B in the case of individuals enrolled under the Federal Employees

Health Benefits program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 13, 2001

Mrs. MINK of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees

on Ways and Means, and Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to waive

the part B premium penalty for individuals entitled to

TRICARE health benefits as a member or former member of the uniformed services, or dependent of such a

member or former member, and to amend title 10,

United States Code, to waive the TRICARE requirement

for enrollment in Medicare part B in the case of individuals enrolled under the Federal Employees Health Benefits program.
2

•HR 997 IH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF MEDICARE PART B LATE ENROLL4 MENT PENALTY FOR INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE

5 FOR TRICARE BENEFITS.

6 Section 1839(b) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

7 1395r(b)) is amended by inserting after the second sen8 tence the following new sentence: ‘‘The monthly premium

9 shall not be increased under this subsection for any month

10 in the case of an individual who, for such month, is enti11 tled to hospital insurance benefits under part A and is

12 permitted to be eligible for health benefits under section

13 1086 of title 10, United States Code, under subsection

14 (d)(2) of such section.’’.

15 SEC. 2. TRICARE WAIVER OF MEDICARE PART B ENROLL16 MENT REQUIREMENT FOR FEHBP-ENROLLED

17 INDIVIDUALS.

18 Section 1086(d)(2)(A) of title 10, United States

19 Code, as amended by section 712(a) of the Floyd D.

20 Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal

21 Year 2001 (as enacted into law by section 1 of Public Law

22 106–398), is amended by inserting ‘‘or is enrolled in a

23 health benefits plan under the Federal Employees Health

24 Benefits program under chapter 89 of title 5’’ before the

25 semicolon.
3

•HR 997 IH

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendments made by this Act take effect on Oc3 tober 1, 2001, and apply to premiums and benefits for

4 months beginning on or after such date.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 321 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 116
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 321

                          [Report No. 107-349]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2001

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of Thursday, December 20, 
2001, providing for consideration or disposition of a conference report 
to accompany the bill (H.R. 3338) making appropriations for the 
Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, 
and for other purposes.

                                                 House Calendar No. 116

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 321

                          [Report No. 107-349]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 19, 2001

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Hillsborough,

Dec., 1900.

#### Laton *v.*Balcom.

Writ of Entry. Trial by the court.

*Gfeorge B. French,*for the plaintiff.

*Charles W. Iloibt*and *Burns*Burns, for the defendant.

Parsons, J.

The controversy as to the title cannot be settled without a determination of the validity of the tax title under' which the defendant claims. This cannot be decided until it is found who was the occupant of the *locus*at the time of the sale. Upon this question the case contains evidence only. It is not advisable to attempt to pass upon the legal questions presented by the remaining facts until this fact is found. *Fellows*v. *Fellows,*68 N. H. 611; *State*v. *Railroad, ante, p.*421.

*Case discharged.*

Peaslee, J., did not sit: the others concurred.