alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1156.html[7/22/2015 2:51:32 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvd-t8zb

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1156

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Patrick Hurley

General Comment

I can manage my own retirement without the governments control. Do not try to take my liberty away.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0862.html[7/21/2015 4:45:05 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-nht6

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0862

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Gary Stiles

Address:

Charlotte, 28277

Email: grsbuckheel@gmail.com

Phone: 704-619-3099

General Comment

The government wastes money. I don't. Stay away from the people's money, especially those of us who work non

 governmental jobs & don't receive all the perks of governmental workers. When the government is debt free,

 then we can sit down and talk.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 8, 2016

NO. 03-14-00489-CR

April Faulkner, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 7 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of 

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs 

is made.
§ 543.8 Processing an exemption petition. ( a ) NHTSA processes any complete petition. If a manufacturer submits a petition that does not contain all the information required by this part, NHTSA informs the manufacturer of the areas of insufficiency and advises the manufacturer that the agency does not process the petition until it receives the required information.
( b ) The agency grants a petition for an exemption from the parts-marking requirements of part 541 either in whole or in part, if it determines that, based upon substantial evidence, the standard equipment antitheft device is likely to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking requirements of part 541.
( c ) The agency issues its decision either to grant or deny an exemption petition not later than 120 days after the date on which a complete petition is filed.
( d ) Any exemption granted under this part applies only to the vehicle line or lines that are the subject of the grant, and are equipped with the antitheft device on which the line's exemption was based.
( e ) An exemption granted under this part is effective for the model year beginning after the model year in which NHTSA issue the notice of exemption, unless the notice of exemption specifies a later model year.
( f ) If the petition is sought under § 543.6, NHTSA publishes a notice of its decision to grant or deny an exemption petition in the Federal Register and notifies the petitioner in writing of the agency's decision.
( g ) If the petition is sought under § 543.7, NHTSA notifies the petitioner in writing of the agency's decision to grant or deny an exemption petition.
[52 FR 33829, Sept. 8, 1987. Redesignated and amended at 81 FR 66841, Sept. 29, 2016]
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 320 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 115
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 320

                          [Report No. 107-348]

  Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3529) to provide tax 
 incentives for economic recovery and assistance to displaced workers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2001

   Mr. Reynolds, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3529) to provide tax 
 incentives for economic recovery and assistance to displaced workers.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 3529) to provide tax incentives for economic 
recovery and assistance to displaced workers. The bill shall be 
considered as read for amendment. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening 
motion except: (1) two hours of debate on the bill equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit. The yeas and nays 
shall be considered as ordered on the question of passage. Clause 5(b) 
of rule XXI shall not apply to the bill or amendments thereto.

                                                 House Calendar No. 115

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 320

                          [Report No. 107-348]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3529) to provide tax 
 incentives for economic recovery and assistance to displaced workers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 19, 2001

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Monroe

total population 21757

population in NAA 163

fraction 0.00749

VOC NOx SO2 PM-10 PM-2.5 NH3 VOC NOx SO2

EGU Point 356.24 27548.67 86349.70 602.31 260.53 0.00 2.67 206.39 646.92

Non-EGU Point 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Area 733.38 44.23 47.30 2910.59 398.52 671.64 5.49 0.33 0.35

Fire 167.27 72.93 17.51 327.42 286.23 13.39 1.25 0.55 0.13

Non-road 252.80 458.50 33.70 22.80 21.20 0.10 1.89 3.44 0.25

On-road 2221.80 3205.90 113.50 69.70 52.00 79.40 16.65 24.02 0.85

Putnam

total population 18812

population in NAA 3088

fraction 0.16415

VOC NOx SO2 PM-10 PM-2.5 NH3 VOC NOx SO2

EGU Point 125.65 27894.93 73943.10 2185.05 945.63 0.00 20.63 4578.97 12137.80

Non-EGU Point 259.25 56.21 6.03 16.84 16.62 0.00 42.56 9.23 0.99

Area 535.45 106.48 208.36 2289.78 340.37 323.42 87.89 17.48 34.20

Fire 189.09 83.82 22.98 385.98 331.91 17.57 31.04 13.76 3.77

Non-road 465.20 179.60 15.90 18.10 17.20 0.20 76.36 29.48 2.61

On-road 971.20 1045.30 43.30 26.60 19.80 30.30 159.42 171.59 7.11

Notes:

Emissions data are from VISTAS 2002 actural.

Populations are from CENSUS 2000.

Total emissions (tons/year)

Total emissions (tons/year)

Emissions in NAA (tons/year)

Emissions in NAA (tons/year)
PM-10 PM-2.5 NH3

4.51 1.95 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00

21.81 2.99 5.03

2.45 2.14 0.10

0.17 0.16 0.00

0.52 0.39 0.59

PM-10 PM-2.5 NH3

358.68 155.23 0.00

2.76 2.73 0.00

375.87 55.87 53.09

63.36 54.48 2.88

2.97 2.82 0.03

4.37 3.25 4.97

sions in NAA (tons/year)

sions in NAA (tons/year)
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 16, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, April 16, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18D0400. JAMES L. BROWN v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: CR090633
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, September 27, 1995 (121), Para 121.31 Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 1601]
[Page 1458]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.121.31  providing for the consideration of h.r. 1601

  Ms. PRYCE, by direction of the Committee on Rules, called up the 
following resolution (H. Res. 228):

       Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this 
     resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule 
     XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 
     Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 
     the bill (H.R. 1601) to authorize appropriations to the 
     National Aeronautics and Space Administration to develop, 
     assemble, and operate the International Space Station. The 
     first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General 
     debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one 
     hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
     ranking minority member of the Committee on Science. After 
     general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment 
     under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider 
     as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the 
     five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute 
     recommended by the Committee on Science now printed in the 
     bill. Each section of the committee amendment in the nature 
     of a substitute shall be considered as read. During 
     consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the 
     Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on 
     the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has 
     caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional 
     Record designated for that purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII. 
     Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. At the 
     conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 
     Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with 
     such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may 
     demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted 
     in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee 
     amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous 
     question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 
     amendments thereto to final passage without intervening 
     motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
     instructions.

  When said resolution was considered.
  After debate,
  On motion of Ms. PRYCE, the previous question was ordered on the 
resolution to its adoption or rejection and under the operation thereof, 
the resolution was agreed to.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said resolution was agreed to 
was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
```
#### Nora Manning, as Executrix of Jeremiah C. Manning, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*Mary J. Grant, Respondent.

Reported below, 142 App. Div. 921.

(Argued April 24, 1911;

decided May 2, 1911.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third *539judicial department, entered January 14,1911, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict in an action to recover personal property alleged to constitute part of the estate of plaintiff’s testator.

The motion was made upon the ground that the Appellate Division had unanimously decided the verdict was supported by the evidence and that the exceptions were frivolous.

*Nelson L. Robinson*for motion.

*Adelbert N. Boynton*opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
H. Res. 335

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 29, 2002.

Whereas America’s Catholic schools are internationally acclaimed for their academic excellence, but provide students more than a superior scholastic education;

Whereas Catholic schools ensure a broad, values-added education emphasizing the lifelong development of moral, intellectual, physical, and social values in America’s young

people;

Whereas the total Catholic school student enrollment for the

2000–2001 academic year was 2,647,301, the total number of Catholic schools is 8,146, and the student-teacher

ratio is 16 to 1;

Whereas Catholic schools provide more than $17,239,224,112

a year in savings to the Nation based on the average

public school per pupil cost;

Whereas Catholic schools teach a diverse group of students

and over 25 percent of school children enrolled in Catholic schools are minorities;

Whereas the graduation rate of Catholic school students is 95

percent, only 3 percent of Catholic high school students

drop out of school, and 83 percent of Catholic high school

graduates go on to college;
2

•HRES 335 EH

Whereas Catholic schools produce students strongly dedicated

to their faith, values, families, and communities by providing an intellectually stimulating environment rich in

spiritual, character, and moral development; and

Whereas in the 1972 pastoral message concerning Catholic

education, the National Conference of Catholic Bishops

stated, ‘‘Education is one of the most important ways by

which the Church fulfills its commitment to the dignity

of the person and building of community. Community is

central to education ministry, both as a necessary condition and an ardently desired goal. The educational efforts

of the Church, therefore, must be directed to forming

persons-in-community; for the education of the individual

Christian is important not only to his solitary destiny,

but also the destinies of the many communities in which

he lives’’: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) supports the goals of Catholic Schools Week, an

event sponsored by the National Catholic Educational

Association and the United States Catholic Conference

and established to recognize the vital contributions of

America’s thousands of Catholic elementary and secondary schools; and

(2) congratulates Catholic schools, students, parents, and teachers across the Nation for their ongoing

contributions to education, and for the key role they play
3

•HRES 335 EH

in promoting and ensuring a brighter, stronger future

for this Nation.

Attest:

Clerk.
Presidential Documents

54205 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 183 

Friday, September 21, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of September 20, 2007 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to 

Persons Who Commit, Threaten To Commit, or Support 

Terrorism 

On September 23, 2001, by Executive Order 13224, I declared a national 

emergency with respect to persons who commit, threaten to commit, or 

support terrorism, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers 

Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706). I took this action to deal with the unusual 

and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy 

of the United States constituted by the grave acts of terrorism and threats 

of terrorism committed by foreign terrorists, including the terrorist attacks 

in New York, in Pennsylvania, and against the Pentagon committed on 

September 11, 2001, and the continuing and immediate threat of further 

attacks against United States nationals or the United States. Because the 

actions of these persons who commit, threaten to commit, or support terrorism continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the United 

States, the national emergency declared on September 23, 2001, and the 

measures adopted on that date to deal with that emergency, must continue 

in effect beyond September 23, 2007. Therefore, in accordance with section 

202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing 

for 1 year the national emergency with respect to persons who commit, 

threaten to commit, or support terrorism. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted 

to the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

September 20, 2007. 

[FR Doc. 07–4720 

Filed 9–20–07; 11:35 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES3GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                       9,132,133
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,731,736
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,973,383
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,031,665
<PP&E>                                       1,569,007
<DEPRECIATION>                                 297,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,239,871
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,260,633
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    190,377
<COMMON>                                        28,889
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,239,871
<SALES>                                      2,280,135
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,404,051
<CGS>                                        1,068,460
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,632,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,228,285)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (697,177)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,531,108)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.60)
        

</TABLE>
§ 511.44 Expert witnesses. ( a ) *Definition.* An expert witness is one who, by reason of education, training, experience, or profession, has peculiar knowlege concerning the matter of science or skill to which his or her testimony relates and from which he or she may draw inferences based upon hypothetically stated facts or from facts involving scientific or technical knowledge.
( b ) *Method of presenting testimony of expert witness.* Except as may be otherwise ordered by the Presiding Officer, a detailed written statement of the elements of the direct testimony of an expert witness shall be filed on the record and exchanged between the parties no later than 10 days preceding the commencement of the hearing. The statement must contain a full explanation of the methodology underlying any analysis, and a full disclosure of the basis of any opinion. The direct testimony of an expert witness shall not include points not contained in the written statement. A party may waive direct examination of an expert witness by indicating that the written statement be considered the testimony of the witness. In such a case, the written testimony shall be incorporated into the record and shall constitute the testimony of the witness.
( c ) *Cross-examination and redirect examination of expert witness.* Cross-examination, redirect examination, and re-cross-examination of an expert witness will proceed in due course based upon the written testimony and any amplifying oral testimony.
( d ) *Failure to file and/or to exchange written statement.* Failure to file and/or to exchange the written statement of an expert witness as provided in this section shall deprive the sponsoring party of the use of the expert witness and of the conclusions which that witness would have presented.
- Page 1
- 775325_Page_2.pdf
Page 1
[Crim. No. 442.

First Appellate District.

April 24, 1913.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. WILLIAM BIRD, Appellant.

Criminal Law—Alibi—Evidence—Letters Written by Accused.— Where the evidence in a burglary ease is vague as to whether the crime was committed on the 23d or the 25th of the month, the latter being the date alleged in the information, and the defense consists chiefly of an alibi, a letter written by the accused in jail and given to his wife to deliver to a person, requesting him to testify that they were together on the 23d, is admissible.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County and from an order refusing a new trial. Wm. S. Wells, Judge.

*762The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Howard *J.*Piersol, for Appellant.

U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, for Respondent.

LENNON, P. J.

The defendant in this case was charged with the crime of burglary. He was convicted of burglary in the second degree, and now appeals from the judgment of final conviction and from an order denying him a new trial.

The information charges the defendant with having committed the crime on the twenty-fifth day of March, 1912; and while the evidence is somewhat vague as to whether the crime was committed on March 23d or 25th of that year, nevertheless it is sufficiently clear from the evidence upon the whole case that the burglary charged against the defendant and of which he was convicted was committed at a time prior to the filing of the information and upon one or other of the above mentioned dates. It was the theory of the prosecution that the crime was committed in the day time. The defendant’s defense consisted chiefly of an alibi and upon direct examination as a witness in his own behalf he gave testimony which tended to show that during the major portion of the day time of March 25th he was at a place remote from the scene of the crime. Upon cross-examination he was shown a letter, purporting to have been written and signed by him, addressed to Mr. Washington, which reads as follows: “My dear friend: I want you for a witness. I want you to say that you was with me on the 23rd of March, that that was the date we went to Alameda and got those greens. We left my house at 10 o’clock and came back at 2 o’clock. You can say that for me to save me. You say that you was with me from 10 o’clock to 2 o’clock, so please do that for me.” It was subsequently shown that this letter was written and signed by the defendant and by him intrusted to his wife for delivery during the period of his incarceration in the county jail. Obviously the letter related to the defendant’s defense of an alibi, and was properly admitted in evidence upon the theory that it tended legitimately to weaken the defendant’s testimony given in support of such defense.

*763We have examined the remaining points presented in support of the appeal, and find that they are not worthy of serious discussion.

The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

Kerrigan, J., and Hall, J., concurred.