alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Greg Gilbert [mailto:greg@8financial.com] 

Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 9:20 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule

To: Fred Wong

I am an owner of a member FINRA firm fully opposed to the over‐reaching regulatory arm of the

DOL's proposal to make advice to non‐ERISA IRA's a fiduciary standard.  Labor ends with

retirement or separation of service.  An individual retirement account is the sole property of the

individual once the funds have been rolled over from a group employee or pension plan.  The

participant is free to spend, invest, lose, or liquidate as much or as little as their right.  The

question for the Department of Labor is the individually self directed owner subject to fiduciary

treatment of the IRA funds once rolled over from a group employee plan?  Why are the

professional advisors subject to the prudent man rule?  Does this mean all IRA's will be handled

by financial advisors under the Investment Advisor ACT of 1940, subject to fee only

compensation?  Will commissions which can reduce long‐term expense drag on investments be

eliminated?  Does the Department of Labor intend to supercede FINRA and regulate IRA's?  Will

IRA's no longer be held at member firms or banks, but only RIA's?   

Aside from the questions, where is the authority granted to the Department of Labor under

ERISA is regulate an individuals right to choose how they pay for investments or select them? It

is my opinion that this fiduciary proposal discriminates against the individuals choice of

services.   

Greg Gilbert

Infinity Financial Services

Greg Gilbert, CFP

President

greg@8financial.com

1624 Franklin St. Ste. 1001 

Oakland, CA 94612

tel: 510.628.0671 

fax: 510.628.0689 

mobile: 510.755.5579 

www.infinitysecurities.com 

Want a signature like this?
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            4619
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       34
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4653
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    4653
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               96
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        4557
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      4653
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 30343
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      902
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   435
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 391
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  28615
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              28615
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (1433)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     27182
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   325.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   325.00
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 587

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 587 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 587.11 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 160 (Monday, August 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 56908]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-17935]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #18061 and #18062; HAWAII Disaster Number HI-
00073]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for the State of 
HAWAII

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for the State of Hawaii (FEMA-4724-DR), dated 08/10/2023.
    Incident: Wildfires.
    Incident Period: 08/08/2023 and continuing.

DATES: Issued on 08/10/2023.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/10/2023.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/10/2024.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 08/10/2023, applications 
for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other 
locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): Maui
Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):
    Hawaii: Kalawao

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere.................      5.000
  Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      2.500
  Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere.................      8.000
  Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      4.000
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.375
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.375
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit      4.000
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.375
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 18061 5 
and for economic injury is 18062 0.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco S[aacute]nchez, Jr.,
Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2023-17935 Filed 8-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
#### § 601.23 Initiation of rulemaking.

The Administrator initiates rulemaking on his/her own motion. However, in so doing, he/she may, in his/her discretion, consider the recommendations of his/her staff or other agencies of the United States or of other interested persons.
##### 



COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Exhibit 32.2 Certification of CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Comprehensive Care Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending May 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 26, 2004 (the Report),
Robert J. Landis, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that: (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/   Robert J. LandisRobert J. LandisAugust 26, 2004
    Chief Financial Officer This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to SS. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Comprehensive Care
Corporation and will be retained by Comprehensive Care Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 56
Editorial Note on Part 393
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 393 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 393.24 Requirements for head lamps, auxiliary driving lamps and front fog lamps. ( a ) *Headlamps.* Every bus, truck and truck tractor shall be equipped with headlamps as required by § 393.11(a). The headlamps shall provide an upper and lower beam distribution of light, selectable at the driver's will and be steady-burning. The headlamps shall be marked in accordance with FMVSS No. 108. Auxiliary driving lamps and/or front fog lamps may not be used to satisfy the requirements of this paragraph.
( b ) *Auxiliary driving lamps and front fog lamps.* Commercial motor vehicles may be equipped with auxiliary driving lamps and/or front fog lamps for use in conjunction with, but not in lieu of the required headlamps. Auxiliary driving lamps shall meet SAE Standard J581 Auxiliary Upper Beam Lamps, July 2004, and front fog lamps shall meet SAE Standard J583 Front Fog Lamp, August 2004. (See § 393.7 for information on the incorporation by reference and availability of these documents.)
( c ) *Mounting.* Headlamps shall be mounted and aimable in accordance with FMVSS No. 108. Auxiliary driving lamps and front fog lamps shall be mounted so that the beams are aimable and the mounting shall prevent the aim of the lighting device from being disturbed while the vehicle is operating on public roads.
( d ) *Aiming.* Headlamps, auxiliary driving lamps and front fog lamps shall be aimed to meet the aiming specifications in FMVSS No. 108 (49 CFR 571.108), SAE J581, and SAE J583, respectively.
[70 FR 48046, Aug. 15, 2005]
Exhibit 31.1



Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer







I, Roy Dalene, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Hamptons Luxury Homes, Inc.



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and



c)

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls.



6.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: September 12, 2005



/s/ Roy Dalene



Roy Dalene

Chief Executive Officer
# Carter reaffirms bilateral relationship with Jordanian leaders, meets with top Saudi officials

/ Published July 23, 2015

**WASHINGTON, July 22, 2015 –** Defense Secretary Ash Carter met in Jordan on Wednesday with Gen. Mashal al-Zaben, King Abdullah II’s advisor for military affairs and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the Jordanian armed forces, and Lt. Gen. Prince Faisal bin Hussein, Pentagon Press Secretary Peter Cook said.

“Secretary Carter reaffirmed the closeness of the U.S.-Jordan strategic relationship, and the leaders discussed mutual concerns in the region, including the ongoing crisis in Syria,” Cook said.

Carter also expressed his deep appreciation for the Jordanian armed forces' leadership in the region and commended them for playing a leading role in the global coalition effort to deliver a lasting defeat to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, he added.

In addition, Carter met in Jiddah, Saudi Arabia, Wednesday with King Salman, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Nayef and Deputy Crown Prince ‎and Defense Minister Mohammed bin Salman, Cook said.

In a statement summarizing the meeting, Cook said the leaders affirmed the longtime security partnership between the United States and Saudi Arabia, discussing a range of issues pertaining to both nations' mutual security interests, including checking Iranian destabilizing activities in the region and countering violent extremism from groups such as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant.

Building on commitments made at the Gulf Cooperation Council summit hosted by President Barack Obama at Camp David in May, Carter spoke to a number of areas where the United States and Saudi Arabia can deepen their security cooperation for the benefit of both countries, Cook said. These include enhancing training for special operations and counterterrorism forces, integrating air and missile defense systems, bolstering cyber defenses and strengthening maritime security, he added.

(DoD News, Defense Media Activity contributed to this report)
IV

House Calendar No. 108

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 312

[Report No. 107–332]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 2883) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2002 for

intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the United States Government, the Community Management Account, and the Central Intelligence

Agency Retirement and Disability System, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 11, 2001

Mr. GOSS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 2883) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2002 for intelligence and intelligencerelated activities of the United States Government, the

Community Management Account, and the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System, and

for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 2883) to authorize appropriations
2

HRES 312 RH

1 for fiscal year 2002 for intelligence and intelligence-re2 lated activities of the United States Government, the Com3 munity Management Account, and the Central Intelligence

4 Agency Retirement and Disability System, and for other

5 purposes. All points of order against the conference report

6 and against its consideration are waived.

House Calendar No. 108

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 312

[Report No. 107–332]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2883) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2002 for intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the

United States Government, the Community Management Account, and the Central IntelligenceAgency Retirement and Disability System, andfor other purposes.

DECEMBER 11, 2001

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7242

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff – Appellee, 

 v. 

ALEX BRADLEY, JR., 

 Defendant – Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, 

District Judge. (4:04-cr-00088-RAJ-FBS-2; 4:07-cv-00120-RAJ) 

Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 22, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Alex Bradley, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Richard Murphy, 

Special Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, 

Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Alex Bradley, Jr., seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2008) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bradley has 

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-17-0000185 13-DEC-2019 07:53 AM
#### § 585.25 Records.

Each manufacturer shall maintain records of the Vehicle Identification Number of each vehicle for which information is reported under § 585.24(c) and (d)(2) until December 31, 2008.
Amendment to the Segue Software, Inc. Special Termination and Vesting Plan



 Exhibit 10.32 
 AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 SEGUE SOFTWARE, INC. 
 SPECIAL TERMINATION AND VESTING PLAN 
 A. The Segue Software, Inc. Special Termination and Vesting Plan adopted on February 5, 1997 is hereby amended by adding the following Section 12 at the end
thereof: 
 “12. Compliance with Section 409A. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, if at the
time of a Covered Employee’s termination of employment with the Company, the Covered Employee is a “specified employee” as defined in Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and the
Company notifies the Covered Employee that, based on the advice of counsel, the deferral of the commencement of any payment of base salary otherwise payable hereunder as a result of such termination of employment is necessary in order to comply with
Section 409A of the Code, then the Company will defer the commencement of the payment of such base salary hereunder (without any reduction in such payment ultimately paid or provided to the Covered Employee) by a period of at least six months.
Any payments of base salary that would have been paid during such six-month period but for the provisions of the preceding sentence shall be paid in a lump sum within the first five (5) days of the seventh month following the Covered
Employee’s termination of employment. The provisions of this Section 12 shall apply only to the extent required to avoid the Covered Employee’s incurrence of any accelerated or additional tax under Section 409A of the Code.”

 B. The effective date of this Amendment shall be as of January 1, 2005. 
 C. Except as expressly amended herein, the Plan remains in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA 

FIFTH DISTRICT 

 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

 DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED 

JOSEPH M. DENNIS, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D17-4033

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Opinion filed February 20, 2018

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for St. Johns County,

Howard M. Maltz, Judge.

Joseph M. Dennis, Raiford, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. See Robbinson v. State, 784 So. 2d 1246, 1247 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) 

(holding Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), does not apply to Florida’s habitual 

offender statute). 

ORFINGER, WALLIS and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.