alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31

I, Joseph J. Lazzara, certify that: 

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofScientific Technologies Incorporated;

Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report; 

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have: 

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant'sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant'smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;and 

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): 

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 14, 2003
/s/ Joseph J. Lazzara
1210-AB32-2-1578.html[7/26/2015 8:19:31 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jxt-f64q

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2075

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Becky Bush

Organization: freedom works

General Comment

Leave my 401k alone. I can plan for my own retirement. I don't need a nanny state to do it for me.
Exhibit 10.28

                           LOAN AGREEMENT MODIFICATION

Agreement made this 16th day of December, 2003 by and between Scores Holding
Company, Inc. ("SCOH") and HEM Mutual Assurance Fund Limited ("HEM").

Whereas SCOH and HEM entered into a Loan Agreement dated as of August 7, 2002,
under which HEM lent to SCOH the sum of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) (the
"Loan Agreement").

Whereas the Loan Agreement provides that in certain circumstances SCOH may repay
all remaining principal and interest due on the Loan by issuing to HEM One
Hundred Thousand of SCOH's common stock purchase warrants.

Whereas SCOH desires to issue, and HEM desires to receive, common stock purchase
warrants of SCOH in full payment of all principal and accrued interest due HEM
from SCOH under the Loan Agreement.

Now, therefore, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. Payment of Loan Agreement. In full payment of all of the principal and
accrued interest due from SCOH to HEM under the Loan Agreement, SCOH shall issue
to HEM its warrant to acquire One Hundred Thousand (100,000) Shares of common
stock of SCOH. HEM hereby accepts the warrant in full payment of all obligations
due under the Loan Agreement.

2. Terms of Warrant. The Warrant shall be exercisable for One Hundred Thousand
Shares of SCOH common stock at a price equal to 75% of the average of the three
lowest closing bid prices per share of SCOH's common stock during the forty (40)
trading days immediately preceding the date of this agreement. The warrant shall
have a term of three (3) years. The warrant shall be in the form annexed hereto
as Exhibit A.

3. General. Excerpt as herein provided, the terms of the Loan Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect, to the extent that the Loan Agreement survives
the payment in full of all obligations due thereunder pursuant to this
Agreement.

      In witness whereof, the undersigned have executed this agreement as of the
day and day first above written.

Scores Holding Company, Inc.

By:   /s/ Richard Goldring
      ----------------------------------
          Richard Goldring, CEO


HEM Mutual Assurance Fund Limited

By:   /s/ Pierce Loughran
      ----------------------------------
          Pierce Loughran
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 294

Expressing the gratitude of the House of Representatives to the General

Accounting Office and its employees for enabling the House to continue

its work while the House office buildings were closed due to the presence

of Anthrax.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 27, 2001

Mr. NEY (for himself, Mr. HOYER, Mr. HASTERT, Mr. GEPHARDT, Mr.

EHLERS, Mr. FATTAH, Mr. LINDER, Mr. DAVIS of Florida, Mr. REYNOLDS, Mr. DOOLITTLE, and Mrs. BIGGERT) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

NOVEMBER 27, 2001

Committee on House Administration discharged; considered under suspension

of the rules and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing the gratitude of the House of Representatives

to the General Accounting Office and its employees for

enabling the House to continue its work while the House

office buildings were closed due to the presence of Anthrax.

Whereas the House of Representatives recently found it necessary to close its office buildings to Members, staff, and

the public due to the presence of Anthrax;

Whereas the Comptroller General made an offer to the House

of Representatives to make the General Accounting Of-
2

•HRES 294 ATH

fice’s building and equipment available to the Members

and staff of the House of Representatives during the period in which the House office buildings were closed, an

offer the House gratefully accepted;

Whereas the House’s subsequent temporary use of General

Accounting Office workspaces, telephones, computers,

and other equipment imposed an inconvenience on the

employees of the Office, who graciously vacated their

worksites; and

Whereas the sacrifices made by employees of the General Accounting Office during this period enabled the House of

Representatives to continue its legislative work on behalf

of the people of the United States: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives ex2 presses its gratitude to the General Accounting Office for

3 accommodating the House during the recent closure of the

4 House office buildings, and sincerely thanks the hundreds

5 of General Accounting Office employees who generously

6 vacated their workspaces and otherwise helped to make

7 it possible for the work of the House to continue during

8 this period.

9 SEC. 2. The Clerk of the House of Representatives

10 shall transmit a copy of this resolution to the Comptroller

11 General of the United States.

Æ
H. Res. 248

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 3, 2001.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2646) to provide for the continuation of agricultural programs through fiscal year 2011. The first reading

of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against

consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be

confined to the bill and shall not exceed two hours equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on Agriculture. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the

five-minute rule. In lieu of the amendments recommended by

the Committees on Agriculture and International Relations

now printed in the bill, it shall be in order to consider as an

original bill for the purpose of amendment under the fiveminute rule an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text printed in part A of the report of the Com-
2

•HRES 248 EH

mittee on Rules accompanying this resolution, modified by

the amendment printed in part B of the report. That amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as

read. All points of order against that amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived. No amendment to that

amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed before October 3, 2001, in the portion of

the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in

clause 8 of rule XVIII and except pro forma amendments for

the purpose of debate. Each amendment so printed may be

offered only by the Member who caused it to be printed or

his designee and shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such

amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may

demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment

adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the

amendment in the nature of a substitute made in order as

original text. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage
3

•HRES 248 EH

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit

with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6558

GARY L. BUTTS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Orangeburg. C. Weston Houck, District Judge.

(CA-97-577-5-12JI)

Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 9, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary L. Butts, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy

Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Gary L. Butts seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Butts v. South Carolina, No. CA-97-577-5-

12JI (D.S.C. Mar. 30, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
----

| (1)   | the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | August 6, 2009 | /s/ W. Page Ogden  |   |
|--------|----------------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |           | W. Page Ogden           |   |
|   |           | Chief Executive Officer |   |
###### Editorial Note on Part 389

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 389 appear at 66 FR 49873, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 389.25 Additional rulemaking proceedings.

The Administrator may initiate any further rulemaking proceedings that he/she finds necessary or desirable. For example, interested persons may be invited to make oral arguments, to participate in conferences between the Administrator or his/her representative at which minutes of the conference are kept, to appear at informal hearings presided over by officials designated by the Administrator at which a transcript or minutes are kept, or to participate in any other proceeding to assure informed administrative action and to protect the public interest.

[78 FR 58482, Sept. 24, 2013]
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11019 and #11020]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Illinois (FEMA-1722-DR), dated 08/30/2007. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         08/07/2007 through 08/08/2007. *Effective Date:*
                         08/30/2007. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         10/29/2007. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/30/2008.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 08/30/2007, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): Stephenson, Winnebago. Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only): *Illinois:*
                     Boone, Carroll, DeKalb, JoDaviess, Ogle. *Wisconsin:*
                     Green, Lafayette, Rock. The Interest Rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.250Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.125Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
8.000Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.250Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000For Economic Injury:Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 110196 and for economic injury is 110200. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Herbert L. Mitchell, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 07-4451 Filed 9-14-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
I, Richard R. Schreiber, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A (Amendment No. 2) of Chief Consolidated Mining Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: October 19, 2007


/s/ Richard R. Schreiber
Richard R. Schreiber
Chief Executive Officer


---
EXHIBIT 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-69741 and333-127544 on Form S-3 and Registration Statements No. 333-129538 and 333-84447 on Form S-8 of ourreport dated February 22, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financialstatement schedules of CNA Financial Corporation and subsidiaries (which report expresses anunqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph concerning a change in method ofaccounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans in 2006), and of our report dated February 22, 2007on management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of CNA Financial Corporation andsubsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2006.DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPChicago,Illinois
-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 04/27/2010 08:39PM -----
To: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 
From: Tony Robledo/R6/USEPA/US 
Date: 04/27/2010 06:15PM 
cc: Cynthia Kaleri/R6/USEPA/US@EPA 
Subject: Fw: RE: Engine Estimates
Melanie - here's one of your requested items - I'll send the rest in another email to follow.  
Hope this is helpful - feel free to contact me or the state folks directly if you have questions 
or need additional information.
 
 
-----Forwarded by Tony Robledo/R6/USEPA/US on 04/27/2010 05:05PM -----
To: Tony Robledo/R6/USEPA/US@EPA 
From: Keith Jordan <Keith.Jordan@LA.GOV> 
Date: 04/23/2010 07:57AM 
Subject: RE: Engine Estimates 
 
 
(See attached file: Engines in 2008 EI.xlsx)
Tony,

First Tab:
Our Emissions Inventory people put together the list on the first tab that was to include all Internal 
Combustion Engines. I tried to leave in only the ones fired by Natural Gas.

Second Tab:
The question of which engines have controls such as SCR is more difficult. Air Permits picked put three 
reporting requirements from the TEMP requirements library: Requirement ID =     1485673 or 1485674 
or 471593. I wrote a query to look for Internal Combustion engines with those requirements.

    
Thanks,  
Keith Jordan  
Surveillance Division  
225-219-3613 
From: Robledo.Tony@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Robledo.Tony@epamail.epa.gov]  
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 2:48 PM 
To: braun@adeq.state.ar.us; Keith Jordan; debra.mcelroy@state.nm.us; Brad_Flaming_-
_brad.flaming@deq.ok.gov; stahiri@tceq.state.tx.us 
Cc: kimbrough@adeq.state.ar.us; Betty Brousseau; richard.groshong@deq.ok.gov; Laura_Clarke_-
_lclarke@tceq.state.tx.us 
Subject: Engine Estimates

Do you know of an estimates of how many of these engines are controlled in your State - realize that this 
may take some time so if you can get back to me by Friday April 23rd.      
 
EPA HQ's is trying to get a handle on what the current landscape is for rich burn spark ignition (gas-fired) 
engines in terms of how many of the existing engines that are already in use that have emission controls 
(non-selective catalytic reduction or NSCR) installed.    
 
The reason is that EPA HQ's is looking at what the impacts of the NESHAP for existing spark ignition 
engines would be if controls were required for those engines, and it would be helpful if they had some 
idea of how many of them already have these controls even in the absence of the NESHAP.  The 
engines of most concern are those that are <500 HP at major sources of HAP and any HP at area 
sources of HAP, since EPA already has limits on the ones that are >500 HP at major sources.  
 
Tony Robledo  
U.S. EPA Region 6  
Air Toxics Section  
1445 Ross Ave.  
Dallas, TX  75202  
214.665.8182