alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 179 (Monday, September 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52849-52850]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4581]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee will hold a 
meeting on October 9, 2007 at the Sierra Nevada College, 999 Tahoe 
Boulevard, Incline Village, NV 89451. This Committee, established by 
the Secretary of Agriculture on December 15, 1998 (64 FR 2876), is 
chartered to provide advice to the Secretary on implementing the terms 
of the Federal Interagency Partnership on the Lake Tahoe Region and 
other matters raised by the Secretary.

DATES: The meeting will be held October 9, 2007, beginning at 1 p.m. 
and ending at 4 p.m.

[[Page 52850]]


ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Sierra Nevada College, 999 Tahoe 
Boulevard, Incline Village, NV 89451.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arla Hains, Lake Tahoe Basin 
Management Unit, Forest Service, 35 College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 
96150, (530) 543-2773.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Items to be covered on the agenda include: 
(1) Discussion of possible changes to the Implementation Agreement, 
Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act of 1998 Public Law 105-263 
(as amended); (2) an update on the Environmental Improvement Program; 
and (3) Public Comment. All Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee 
meetings are open to the public. Interested citizens are encouraged to 
attend at the above address. Issues may be brought to the attention of 
the Committee during the open public comment period at the meeting or 
by filing written statements with the secretary for the Committee 
before or after the meeting. Please refer any written comments to the 
Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit at the contact address stated above.

    Dated: September 11, 2007.
Terri Marceron,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 07-4581 Filed 9-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### Eliza Yeddo, *Respondent, v.*L. Greenville Whitney and another, *Appellants.*

Judgment reversed, new trial granted; referee discharged, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Boardman, J.
#### William Berg, *Respondent, v.*The Tilly Foster Iron Manufacturing Company, *Appellant.*

— Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
* The case is unanimously ordered submitted without oral argument pursuant to

Fed. R. App. P. 34(a) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### JUL 21 1998 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
PATRICK WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SHARON LEVANSAILOR, Defendant - Appellee. No. 98-4006 (D.C. No. 94-CV-426) (District of Utah)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before ANDERSON , McKAY and LUCERO , Circuit Judges.
Patrick Williams, an inmate at the Salt Lake County Metro Jail, filed a lawsuit against Sharon Levansailor, a medical techn ician employed by the Metro Jail, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985. William s alleges that defendant violated his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment by telling a racist joke in front of him and other inmates. The district court granted summary judgment in- 2 -

favor of defendant, adopting the findings of the Ma gistrate’s Report and Recommendation. We affirm. Plaintiff, claims the defendant, while distributing medication at the Metro Jail, called some white inmates to the bars of the cell and asked if they wanted to hear a good joke. When Williams asked what was hap pening, defendant allegedly responded that she was telling a joke about “you gu ys” and laughed. According to plaintiff, defendant then proceeded to tell a ra cially derogatory joke that offended and embarrassed Williams. This conduct, if true, is deplorable and unprofessi onal. It does not, however, constitute a violation of plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment rights. See Collins v. Cundy , 603 F.2d 825, 827 (10th Cir. 1979) (verbal abuse alone is not actionable under § 1983); see also Oltarzewski v. Ruggiero , 830 F.2d 136, 139 (9th Cir. 1987) (same) (quoting Collins , 603 F.2d at 827); Patton v. Przybylski , 822 F.2d 697, 700 (7th Cir. 1987) (use of derogatory racial epithets does not violate Fourteenth Amendment); Black Spotted Horse v. Else , 767 F.2d 516, 517 (8th Cir. 1985) (use of racial slurs only violates Fourteenth Amendment if coupled with physical force or other egregious cond uct); cf. Ivey v. Wilson , 832 F.2d 950, 955 (6th Cir. 1987) (verbal abuse does no t violate Eighth Amendment). Plaintiff also asserts a claim alleging disparate t reatment and failure to train. These issues were not raised before the dis trict court and he may not raise- 3 -

them for the first time on appeal. See Lyons v. Jefferson Bank & Trust , 994 F.2d 716, 722 (10th Cir. 1993). AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith. ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Carlos F. Lucero Circuit Judge
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1481.html[7/23/2015 11:48:08 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvo-jmof

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1481

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Kathleen Jones

Address:

P.O. Box 3

White Marsh, VA, 23183

Email: koakesjones@aol.com

General Comment

I am not in favor of this additional rule. There are already too many rules that limit my ability to make decisions

 for

myself. I suggest that the Federal Government allow citizens full control of their own retirement plans and

 reduce the taxes

so that retirees might have more dollars to spend during their retirement years. After all, we worked for every

 dollar. Social 

Security funds have been poorly handled by the Federal Government and I think it is a disaster to allow them any

 more

control.

Respectfully,

Kathleen Jones
#### § 565.20 Purpose and scope.

This part specifies the format, content and physical requirements for a vehicle identification number (VIN) system and its installation to simplify vehicle identification information retrieval and to increase the accuracy and efficiency of vehicle recall campaigns.
From: Linda R. Hopkins [mailto:lhopkins@hornershifrin.com] 

Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 4:55 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule

We at Horner & Shifrin, Inc. are voicing our concerns against the DOL proposal regarding the

definition of a fiduciary which includes mandating that all valuators of private company ESOP

stock be fiduciaries to the ESOPs that they value.  

As a private company ESOP, we provide approximately 80 jobs in the consulting engineering

field to the metropolitan St. Louis and Springfield areas. In addition, we contribute a substantial

amount to the retirement of our employees.  

A change of this type will cause the cost of our ESOP valuation to rise substantially along with

the loss of an independent third party.

We urge you not to pass this proposal.

Linda R. Hopkins, C.D.A. 

Vice President

Horner & Shifrin, Inc.  

5200 Oakland Ave. 

St. Louis, MO. 63110-1490 

DD: (314) 335‐8605

PH: (314) 531-4321 FAX: (314) 531-6966 

Providing Engineering Services since 1933 

Visit us at www.hornershifrin.com
1210-AB32-2-1165.html[7/24/2015 7:10:23 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvr-2kzb

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1659

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Jeffrey Anonymous

General Comment

I will control my own 401. I want the Obama administration to stay out....
1210-AB32-2-1478.html[7/26/2015 5:50:02 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwh-33d7

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1974

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: R HOWELL

Address: United States, 

Organization: NOT YOUR BUISNESS.COM

General Comment

Lower our taxes

l built it, I made it with my brains and sweat

Quit making the laws that are defeating us.

Leave your hands off my hard earned savings....I did without in order to save!

READ THE BOOK----BATTLEFIELD AMERICA JUST MAYBE YOUR OWN CHILDREN MAY THANK

 YOU!
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1280.html[7/22/2015 9:42:32 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jve-2hp6

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1280

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Lisa Berman

General Comment

To whom it may concern,

I'm quite capable of taking care of my own retirement. You take care of yours and I'll take care of mine. That's

 my money and I'll decide how, where and when I spend it.

Sincerely,

Lisa Berman
Exhibit 21

Registrant and Subsidiaries of the Registrant

                                                          Percent of Voting
                                        State of          Securities Owned
                                      Incorporation       By the Registrant

Coachmen Industries, Inc. (Registrant)   Indiana                

The Lux Co., Inc.                        Indiana                100%
Michiana Easy Livin' Country, Inc.       Indiana                100%
All American Homes, Inc.                 Indiana                100%
Clarion Motors Corporation               Indiana                100%
Coachmen Foreign Sales Corporation   U.S. Virgin Islands        100%
Viking Recreational Vehicles, Inc.       Michigan               100%
Northwoods RV Country, Inc.              Michigan               100%
Georgie Boy Mfg., Inc.                   Indiana                100%
Coachmen Industries of Texas, Inc.         Texas                100%
Coachmen Industries of Oregon, Inc.       Oregon                100%
Coachmen Industries of California, Inc. California              100%
Freeway Easy Livin' Country, Inc.       California              100%
Gulf Coast Easy Livin' Country, Inc.      Florida               100%
VFP Composites, Inc.                      Florida               100%
Rover, Inc.                                 Ohio                100%
All American Homes of Iowa, Inc.            Iowa                100%
Southern Ambulance Builders, Inc.         Georgia               100%
Colfax Country RV, Inc.                North Carolina           100%
All American Homes of
     North Carolina, Inc.              North Carolina           100%
All American Homes of Tennessee, Inc.     Tennessee             100%
§ 5.5 Public contacts in informal rulemaking. ( a ) *Agency contacts with the public during informal rulemakings conducted in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553 .* ( 1 ) DOT personnel may have meetings or other contacts with interested members of the public concerning an informal rulemaking under 5 U.S.C. 553 or similar procedures at any stage of the rulemaking process, provided the substance of material information submitted by the public that DOT relies on in proposing or finalizing the rule is adequately disclosed and described in the public rulemaking docket such that all interested parties have notice of the information and an opportunity to comment on its accuracy and relevance.
( 2 ) During the pendency of a rulemaking proceeding, DOT personnel must avoid giving persons outside the executive branch information regarding the rulemaking that is not available generally to the public.
( 3 ) If DOT receives an unusually large number of requests for meetings with interested members of the public during the comment period for a proposed rule or after the close of the comment period, the issuing OA or component of OST should consider whether there is a need to extend or reopen the comment period, to allow for submission of a second round of “reply comments,” or to hold a public meeting on the proposed rule.
( 4 ) If the issuing OA or OST component meets with interested persons on the rulemaking after the close of the comment period, it should be open to giving other interested persons a similar opportunity to meet.
( 5 ) If DOT learns of significant new information, such as new studies or data, after the close of the comment period that the issuing OA or OST component wishes to rely upon in finalizing the rule, the OA or OST component should reopen the comment period to give the public an opportunity to comment on the new information. If the new information is likely to result in a change to the rule that is not within the scope of the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), the OA or OST component should consider issuing a supplemental NPRM to ensure that the final rule represents a logical outgrowth of DOT's proposal.
( b ) [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

#### § 40.27 May an employer require an employee to sign a consent or release in connection with the DOT drug and alcohol testing program?

No, as an employer, you must not require an employee to sign a consent, release, waiver of liability, or indemnification agreement with respect to any part of the drug or alcohol testing process covered by this part (including, but not limited to, collections, laboratory testing, MRO and SAP services).

[66 FR 41950, Aug. 9, 2001]
Editorial Note on Part 393
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 393 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 393.83 Exhaust systems. ( a ) Every motor vehicle having a device (other than as part of its cargo) capable of expelling harmful combustion fumes shall have a system to direct the discharge of such fumes. No part shall be located where its location would likely result in burning, charring, or damaging the electrical wiring, the fuel supply, or any combustible part of the motor vehicle.
( b ) No exhaust system shall discharge to the atmosphere at a location immediately below the fuel tank or the fuel tank filler pipe.
( c ) The exhaust system of a bus powered by a gasoline engine shall discharge to the atmosphere at or within 6 inches forward of the rearmost part of the bus.
( d ) The exhaust system of a bus using fuels other than gasoline shall discharge to the atmosphere either: ( 1 ) At or within 15 inches forward of the rearmost part of the vehicle; or
( 2 ) To the rear of all doors or windows designed to be open, except windows designed to be opened solely as emergency exits.
( e ) The exhaust system of every truck and truck tractor shall discharge to the atmosphere at a location to the rear of the cab or, if the exhaust projects above the cab, at a location near the rear of the cab.
( f ) No part of the exhaust system shall be temporarily repaired with wrap or patches.
( g ) No part of the exhaust system shall leak or discharge at a point forward of or directly below the driver/sleeper compartment. The exhaust outlet may discharge above the cab/sleeper roofline.
( h ) The exhaust system must be securely fastened to the vehicle.
( i ) Exhaust systems may use hangers which permit required movement due to expansion and contraction caused by heat of the exhaust and relative motion between engine and chassis of a vehicle.
[53 FR 49401, Dec. 7, 1988]
NAVCENT Remembers POW/MIAs
 By , 5th Fleet Public Affairs - NAVCENT
  **NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY BAHRAIN —** U.S. Naval Forces Central Command (NAVCENT) paid tribute to American prisoners of war/missing in action during a ceremony aboard Naval Support Activity Bahrain, Sept. 19. The event was organized by the NAVCENT Chief’s Mess as part of National POW/MIA Recognition Day. “We cannot forget the 83,000 POW/MIAs from the United States who have paid the ultimate prize to defend our country,” said U.S. Naval Forces Central Command, U.S 5th Fleet Force Command Master Chief James E. DeLozier. “This is significant because we cannot forget history; those who have served before us and with us.” National POW/MIA Recognition Day observances are held across the country on military installations, ships at sea, state capitols, schools and veterans’ facilities. It is traditionally observed on the third Friday in September each year. “Simply forgetting these 83,000 would be a tragedy,” said DeLozier. “It would be a tragedy for the nation and it would be a tragedy for the families who have sacrificed so much. It is important for our current Sailors to remember those who paid the ultimate price, but also for them to understand that this is something that we are going to be faced with as we continue forward.” National POW/MIA Recognition Day is one of six days throughout the year Congress has mandated the flying of the National League of Families’ POW/MIA flag. The others are Armed Forces Day, Memorial Day, Flag Day, Independence Day and Veterans Day. In 2013, 48 U.S. military service members who were once missing were accounted for, and six of them were Sailors who served during the Vietnam War. A complete list of those who have been accounted for can be found at: http://www.dtic.mil/dpmo/accounted_for/ . NAVCENT is the navy’s service component to U.S. Central Command. It is responsible for approximately 2.5 million square miles of area including the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, North Arabian Sea, Gulf of Aden, and the Red Sea. NAVCENT’s mission is to conduct maritime security operations, theater security cooperation efforts, and strengthen partner nations’ maritime capabilities in order to promote security and stability in the U.S. 5th Fleet AOR.
**Exhibit 31.B**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, D. Mark Leland, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of El Paso CGP Company;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
Date: November 29, 2005                 /s/ D. Mark Leland   D. Mark Leland    Executive Vice President and
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC.

|                                          |              |                |  |  |                                | 
|----------------------------------------- | ------------ | -------------- |  |  | ------------------------------ | 
|                                          | Subsidiaries |                |  |  | Jurisdiction of
 Incorporation | 
|                                          |              |                |  |  |                                | 
|                                          |              |               
|Suttle
 Apparatus Corporation             |              | Illinois      
|Suttle Costa
 Rica, S.A.                  |              | Costa Rica    
|Tel
 Products, Inc.                       |              | Minnesota     
|Suttle
 Caribe, Inc.                      |              | Minnesota     
|Austin
 Taylor Communications, Ltd.       |              | United Kingdom
|Automatic
 Tool & Connector Company, Inc. |              | New Jersey    
|JDL
 Technologies, Inc.                   |              | Minnesota     
|Transition
 Networks, Inc.                |              | Minnesota     
|Transition
 Networks Shanghai.            |              | China         
|LANart
 Corporation                       |              | Massachusetts 
|MiLAN
 Technology Corporation             |              | California    
|Image
 Systems Corporation                |              | Minnesota     

All such
subsidiaries are 100%-owned directly by Communications Systems, Inc. The
financial statements of all such subsidiaries are included in the consolidated
financial statements of Communications Systems, Inc.

54

---