alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# April 29: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL in Syria and Iraq

/ Published April 29, 2015

April 29, 2015

Release # 20150429FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**SOUTHWEST ASIA –** Coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq between 8 a.m., April 28, and 8 a.m., April 29, local time.  In Syria, Coalition military forces conducted five airstrikes using attack, bomber and fighter aircraft.  Separately in Iraq, Coalition military forces conducted 16 airstrikes approved by the Iraqi Ministry of Defense using attack, fighter and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL terrorists.

“Iraqi Security Forces are in a tough fight in Bayji and Ramadi,” said Col. Wayne Marotto, CJTF-OIR Chief of Public Affairs. “However, the coalition will continue to support them with all requested military capabilities within our means.”

The following is a summary of the strikes conducted since the last press release:

**Syria**

         Near Al Hasakah, an airstrike struck two ISIL fighting positions.

         Near Kobani, four airstrikes struck an ISIL large and two small tactical units, destroying five ISIL fighting positions and an ISIL vehicle.

**Iraq**

         Near Al Asad, an airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit, destroying an ISIL fighting position and an ISIL heavy machine gun.

         Near Al Huwayjah, five airstrikes struck three ISIL staging areas and an ISIL tactical unit, destroying two ISIL VBIEDS and an ISIL vehicle.

         Near Bayji, five airstrikes struck five ISIL tactical units, destroying four ISIL vehicles, an ISIL fighting position and an ISIL warehouse.

         Near Fallujah, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL trench complex.

         Near Mosul, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL excavator.

         Near Ramadi, an airstrike destroyed three ISIL tanker trucks.

         Near Tal Afar, two airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit, destroying an ISIL crane, an ISIL weapons cache and an ISIL vehicle.

Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely.

The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria, the region, and the wider international community. The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Iraq include Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Syria include Bahrain, Canada, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and U.S.
Multinational friendship jump highlights cooperation at Eager Lion 2013
 By Zach Mott Sgt., CENTCOM Public Affairs
  A U.S. Army paratrooper pins U.S. Army Airborne wings onto a Jordanian Armed Forces Soldier following a friendship jump as part of Exercise Eager Lion 2013. The jump involved Soldiers from Jordan, U.S., France and the United Arab Emirates. (U.S. Army photo by Sgt. Zach Mott)
 ZARQA, Jordan – As the sun cascaded across the Jordanian desert, paratroopers dotted the sky as they floated to the ground carrying the seeds of cooperation with them as part of a friendship jump during Exercise Eager Lion 2013. “It was a great opportunity to learn how they conduct an airborne operation and it was a good opportunity for them to watch us conduct and airborne operation,” said U.S. Army Maj. Ryan Schloesser, civil affairs planning chief, 96th Civil Affairs Battalion (Airborne). “It was really just about maintaining that relationship and strengthening that relationship.” Paratroopers from Jordan, France, United Arab Emirates and the U.S. participated in the jump and exchanged jump wings in a ceremony afterward. This ceremony is common for friendship jumps between partnering nations. “Paratroopers always have that little bit of flare, spirit,” said Command Sgt. Maj. Frank A. Grippe, senior enlisted leader for U.S. Army Central Command. “So it’s fun to get up at ‘Oh Dark Thirty’ and have an early morning jump to start the day and for the most part to start the exercise for these nations.” Exercise Eager Lion 2013 is a multinational exercise that replicates modern-day security challenges and is designed to strengthen relationships through a joint, comprehensive multinational approach. Events such as this jump allow each nation to display their expertise and impart some of that wisdom onto others. Following this jump, these soldiers will be conducting more training and information exchanges in order to increase the knowledge and understanding between these partnerships. Eager Lion provides multilateral forces with the opportunity to promote cooperation and interoperability among participating forces, build functional capacity, practice crisis management and enhance readiness. “We always want to teach all over the world that we are one part to face the problems that are going on nowadays. From all parts we are walking with the American soldiers. We learn a lot from them and sometimes we teach them something,” said Jordanian Chief Warrant Officer Firas Domi, the command sergeant major of the Jordanian special operations forces.
§ 511.51 Initial decision. ( a ) *When filed.* The Presiding Officer shall endeavor to file an Initial Decision with the Administrator within sixty (60) days of the close of the record, the filing of post-hearing briefs, or the filing of replies thereto, whichever is latest.
( b ) *Content.* The Initial Decision shall be based upon a consideration of the entire record and it shall be supported by reliable, probative, and substantial evidence. It shall include: ( 1 ) Findings and conclusions, as well as the reasons or bases therefor, upon the material questions of fact, material issues of law, or discretion presented on the record, and should, where practicable, be accompanied by specific page citations to the record and to legal and other materials relied upon.
( 2 ) An appropriate order.
( c ) *By whom made.* The Initial Decision shall be made and filed by the Presiding Officer who presided over the hearing, unless otherwise ordered by the Administrator.
( d ) *Reopening of proceeding by presiding officer; termination of jurisdiction.* ( 1 ) At any time prior to or concomitant with the filing of the Initial Decision, the Presiding Officer may reopen the proceedings for the reception of further evidence.
( 2 ) Except for the correction of clerical errors, the jurisdiction of the Presiding Officer is terminated upon the filing of the Initial Decision, unless and until the proceeding is remanded to the Presiding Officer by the Administrator.
Exhibit 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of APPLIED SPECTRUM  TECHNOLOGIES,  INC.
(the  "Company")  on Form  10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31,  2005,  (the
"Report"), I, Mark R. Littell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)    The Report fully  complies with the  requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



Date:   December 28, 2005                        By: /s/ Mark R. Littell
                                                     --------------------------
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
exv10w33



 





EXHIBIT 10.33




LISTING AGREEMENT AMENDMENT #4




     THIS AGREEMENT, made on November 30, 2003 between EBS Building. L.L.C.
(hereinafter called “OWNER”), and Colliers Turley Martin Tucker (hereinafter
called “BROKER”)



WITNESSETH




     WHEREAS OWNER and BROKER entered into an Exclusive Right to Lease
Agreement dated April 21, 2000 (hereinafter called “AGREEMENT”) for certain
real property known as 501 North Broadway for a term commencing April 21, 2000
and ending October 31, 2001;



     WHEREAS, said Agreement was amended on October 20, 2001 in Listing
Agreement Amendment #1; and further amended on October 24, 2002 in Listing
Agreement Amendment #2; and November 21, 2002 in Listing Agreement Amendment
#3 and



     WHEREAS OWNER and BROKER desire to further amend said AGREEMENT,



     NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:



     That
said AGREEMENT is amended effective November 30, 2003 as follows:



     Said
Listing will be extended for a period of 1 year.



     This Listing Agreement shall expire on November 30, 2004.



     In the event that the property is sold, said AGREEMENT will terminate on
the closing date of the sale.



     That this LISTING AMENDMENT #4 shall be subject to all of the same terms
and conditions contained in the AGREEMENT except as hereinabove stated to the
contrary.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OWNER and BROKER have caused this LISTING
AGREEMENT AMENDMENT #4 to be executed as of the day and year first written
above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	ACCEPTED:	 	 	 	 
	(OWNER)

	EBS Building, L.L.C.
	 	(BROKER)
	 	 	by FTI Consulting, Inc.
	 	Colliers Turley Martin Tucker Company
	 
	 	its manager 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	/s/ Keith F. Cooper

	 	By:
	 	/s/ David Thiemann
	

	


	 	 	 	
 
	Title:

	Senior Managing Director

	 	Title:
	 	Managing Principal
	Date:

	2/23/04

	 	Date:
	 	2/19/04
	Time:

	 	 	 	Time:
February 11, 2011

Filed via e-ORI@dol.gov

Fred Wong 

Luisa Grillo-Chope

Office of Regulations and Interpretations

Employee Benefits Security Administration

U.S. Department of Labor

Washington, D.C. 20210

Re: Fiduciary Definition Hearing

Dear Sir or Madam:

AARP has submitted in-depth comments concerning our views on the proposed 

regulation. Among the issues we would testify on are the following: 

1. What constitutes investment advice.

2. When should advice concerning plan distributions be 

considered fiduciary advice. 

3. Limitations concerning when an entity is designated a 

fiduciary. 

Because AARP believes the issues raised by this proposed regulation are 

extremely important, we request that AARP be given the opportunity to present 

our views at this hearing. Thank you for your consideration of our request. 

Sincerely,

David Certner

Legislative Counsel and

Director of Legislative Policy

Government Relations and Advocacy
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.163 How does the MRO report drug test results? ( a ) As the MRO, it is your responsibility to report all drug test results to the employer.
( b ) You may use a signed or stamped and dated legible photocopy of Copy 2 of the CCF to report test results.
( c ) If you do not report test results using Copy 2 of the CCF for this purpose, you must provide a written report (e.g., a letter) for each test result. This report must, as a minimum, include the following information: ( 1 ) Full name, as indicated on the CCF, of the employee tested;
( 2 ) Specimen ID number from the CCF and the SSN or employee ID No.;
( 3 ) Reason for the test, if indicated on the CCF (e.g., random, post-accident);
( 4 ) Date of the collection;
( 5 ) Date you received Copy 2 of the CCF;
( 6 ) Result of the test (i.e., positive, negative, dilute, refusal to test, test cancelled) and the date the result was verified by the MRO;
( 7 ) For verified positive tests, the drug(s)/metabolite(s) for which the test was positive;
( 8 ) For cancelled tests, the reason for cancellation; and
( 9 ) For refusals to test, the reason for the refusal determination (e.g., in the case of an adulterated test result, the name of the adulterant).
( d ) As an exception to the reporting requirements of paragraph (b) and (c) of this section, the MRO may report negative results using an electronic data file. ( 1 ) If you report negatives using an electronic data file, the report must contain, as a minimum, the information specified in paragraph (c) of this section, as applicable for negative test results.
( 2 ) In addition, the report must contain your name, address, and phone number, the name of any person other than you reporting the results, and the date the electronic results report is released.
( e ) If you use a written report as provided in paragraph (c) of this section to report results, you must retain a copy of the written report. If you use the electronic data file to report negatives, as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, you must retain a retrievable copy of that report in a format suitable for inspection and audit by a DOT representative. In either case, you must keep the completed Copy 2 of the CCF. When completing Copy 2, either the MRO must sign and date it (for both negatives and non-negatives) or MRO staff must stamp and date it (for negatives only).
( f ) You must not use Copy 1 of the CCF to report drug test results.
( g ) You must not provide quantitative values to the DER or C/TPA for drug or validity test results. However, you must provide the test information in your possession to a SAP who consults with you (see § 40.293(g)).
( h ) You must maintain reports and records related to negatives and cancelled results for one year; you must maintain reports and records related to positives and refusals for five years, unless otherwise specified by applicable DOT agency regulations.
[66 FR 41952, Aug. 9, 2001, as amended at 75 FR 49863, Aug. 16, 2010; 75 FR 59107, Sept. 27, 2010; 76 FR 59578, Sept. 27, 2011; 88 FR 27646, May 2, 2023]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,136
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,023
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,504
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,955
<PP&E>                                          12,303
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,982
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,623
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,213
<BONDS>                                          3,487
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           303
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,620
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,623
<SALES>                                         14,655
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,655
<CGS>                                            9,619
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,619
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 170
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    669
<INCOME-TAX>                                        21
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                648
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       648
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 177 (Thursday, September 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52379-52380]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4506]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Electronic Health 
Records Workgroup Meeting

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 19th meeting of the American Health 
Information Community Electronic Health Records Workgroup in accordance 
with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., 
App.)

DATES: October 23, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. [Eastern].

ADDRESSES: Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20201), Conference Room 4090. Please bring photo ID for entry to a 
Federal building.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/healthrecords/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Workgroup will continue its discussion 
on ways to achieve widespread adoption of certified EHRs, minimizing 
gaps in adoption among providers.
    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional 
information, go to:

[[Page 52380]]

http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/healthrecords/ehr_instruct.html.

    Dated: September 7, 2007.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. 07-4506 Filed 9-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
EXHIBIT 32.2

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Heritage  Worldwide,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  for the quarter  ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  May 12, 2005                                   /s/ Claude Couty
                                                     ----------------------
                                                         Claude Couty
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                                        and General Manager
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. §1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the quarterly report of Alfacell Corporation (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Charles Muniz,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:  June
9, 2009




/s/ Charles
      MunizName:
              Charles
      MunizTitle:
              President
      and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer, Principal Accounting
                Officer
      and Principal Financial
Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Alfacell Corporation and will be retained by Alfacell Corporation and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1155.html[7/22/2015 2:51:29 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvd-ghq4

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1155

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Suzette Corbin

General Comment

I can take care of my own retirement! I don't need obama to control my finances, my food or my health care!!!

 The only thing he has accomplished is dragging

Our once great nation, down into the gutter!! He, along with his minions and the supreme court has committed

 high treason!!! They should all be imprisoned !! 

God is my source for EVERYTHING I need!!! I don't want or need anything from obama !!!
###### Editorial Note on Part 572

#### Editorial Notes:

1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 572.131 General description.

(a) The Hybrid III fifth percentile adult female crash test dummy is defined by drawings and specifications containing the following materials:

(1) Technical drawings and specifications package P/N 880105-000 (refer to § 572.130(a)(1)), the titles of which are listed in Table A;

(2) Parts List and Drawings, Part 572 Subpart O Hybrid III Fifth Percentile Small Adult Female Crash Test Dummy (HIII-5F, Alpha Version) (June 2002) (refer to § 572.130(a)(1)(ix)).

| Component assembly | Drawing No. |
| --- | --- |
| Head Assembly | 880105-100X |
| Neck Assembly | 880105-250 |
| Upper Torso Assembly | 880105-300 |
| Lower Torso Assembly | 880105-450 |
| Complete Leg Assembly—left | 880105-560-1 |
| Complete Leg Assembly—right | 880105-560-2 |
| Complete Arm Assembly—left | 880105-728-1 |
| Complete Arm Assembly—right | 880105-728-2 |

Table A

(b) Adjacent segments are joined in a manner such that, except for contacts existing under static conditions, there is no contact between metallic elements throughout the range of motion or under simulated crash impact conditions.

(c) The structural properties of the dummy are such that the dummy conforms to this Subpart in every respect before use in any test similar to those specified in Standard 208, Occupant Crash Protection.

[65 FR 10968, Mar. 1, 2000, as amended at 67 FR 46414, July 15, 2002]
Exhibit 32-6



Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code



The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Report on Form 10-K of PECO Energy Company for the year ended December 31,
2005, that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of PECO Energy Company.



|                           |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  |                                                                   
|-------------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|                           |  |  | 
|Date:    February 15, 2006 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    JOHN F. YOUNG
|                           |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  | John F. Young Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer