alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Afghanistan visit leaves Dempsey encouraged
 By xxxJohn D. Banusiewicz , American Forces Press Service
  Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin E. Dempsey receives a mountaintop brief from American and Afghani Special Forces at Camp Moorehead, Afghanistan, Apr. 23.(DoD photo by D. Myles Cullen)
 BRUSSELS (April 25, 2012) — The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff wrapped up a two-day visit to Afghanistan April 24 and said he’s encouraged by what he saw and heard there. Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey told American Forces Press Service while en route here for a meeting of NATO defense chiefs that he was especially impressed by yesterday’s visit to NATO Training Mission Afghanistan’s Special Forces Training Center at Camp Morehead in Kabul.“I spent the better part of the day with the [Afghan] commandos and special forces and my counterpart, General [Sher Mohammad] Karimi, just to get their sense of how they feel about themselves,” the chairman said, noting that he also talked with the U.S. service members who mentor them. “I was encouraged on a couple of fronts.“Their self-esteem is increasing,” he continued. “They’re very proud. They’ve got not only a good equipping and training model, but they’re building in a sense of purpose and values to the force ... That part of the force is part of it that I hadn’t really confronted before, and I found it to be very capable, and, I think, moving apace to become a very important part of their security apparatus.”During his Afghanistan visit, Dempsey met with Marine Corps Gen. John R. Allen, commander of the International Security Assistance Force, to seek his perspective on the drawdown of U.S. forces.“It’s going well,” the chairman said. “He’s presented his plan to us now for the drawdown of 23,000 between now and the end of September. And he reported to me that he can accomplish that task and continue to execute the campaign plan to get us to the objectives that were articulated in Lisbon.”NATO’s heads of state and government agreed at their November 2010 summit in the Portuguese capital that security responsibility for all of Afghanistan will transfer to Afghan security forces by the end of 2014. They’ll meet next month in Chicago to set the course from that point on.The drawdown does present some logistics challenges, the general noted.“We’re trying to recover equipment after 10 years of war in that country,” he said. “So we’ve got some challenges ahead; there are a lot of moving pieces. We’re moving our forces around, and they’re moving their forces around, and we’re looking for ways to manage that transition. And it’s all achievable.”Dempsey praised U.S. military logisticians for their track record in meeting difficult challenges, noting that U.S. Transportation Command and all military logisticians always find a way to get the job done.“Transcom is unbelievable,” he said. “I remember back in Desert Storm being impressed by what our logisticians accomplished. But these logisticians today are setting a new standard.”
H. Res. 333

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 23, 2002.

Resolved, That unless otherwise ordered, before Monday,

May 13, 2002, the hour of daily meeting of the House shall

be 2 p.m. on Mondays; 11 a.m. on Tuesdays; and 10 a.m.

on all other days of the week; and from Monday, May 13,

2002, until the end of the second session, the hour of daily

meeting of the House shall be noon on Mondays; 10 a.m. on

Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays; and 9 a.m. on all

other days of the week.

Attest:

Clerk.
From: Steve Benedettini [mailto:SBenedettini@sda-eng.com] 

Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 9:25 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule 

To whom it may concern: 

I am writing to express our firm's opposition to the DOL's proposed rule regarding the definition 

of a fiduciary, which included mandating that all valuators of private company ESOP stock be 

fiduciaries to the ESOPs they value. 

 

Spalding DeDecker Associates (SDA) is a 100 employee ESOP that has been in business 57 

years. We have been an ESOP for the past 30 years. We are 100% employee owned. Our 

employees take great pride in employee-ownership and really do act like owners. We are very 

open in the information we share, which includes financial statements. SDA makes an annual 

contribution to employee's ESOP accounts of between 5-8% of gross wages. This allows 

employees to buy stock in SDA. 

 

The proposed rule would add significant costs to the administration of our ESOP. It would also 

add costs to any potential acquisitions we are considering. This cost would, of course, be passed 

on to our employee-owners, through lower profits, lower stock valuations, and lower annual 

contributions. In short, it would hurt our employees' retirements. 

 

We are strongly opposed to this rule and believe there surely must be other ways to address 

concerns the DOL has that prompted this rule. 

 

Thank you for your consideration. 

 

 

Steve Benedettini

President

Chief Financial Officer 

Spalding DeDecker Associates, Inc. 

905 South Boulevard, East 

Rochester Hills, MI 48307 

(248) 844-5400 

(248) 844-5404 fax

sbenedettini@sda-eng.com

 

Spalding DeDecker Associates, Inc.

"The Benchmark of Excellence"

This email is solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information 

that is privileged, confidential or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of 

this email is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or 

copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, 

please immediately notify us by return email and destroy the original message. Thank you.
#### Jonathan E. Robinson and another, *as*Executors, *Respondents, v.*Ephriam A. Smith and another, Appellants, *Impleaded,*etc.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Dwight, J.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0566.html[7/20/2015 8:59:24 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-1d7j

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0566

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Drew Rutledge

General Comment

You have no right to tell me how to deal with my retirement investments.
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*Wade Buckley, Appellant, v. The President, etc., of Port Jervis, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Dykmau, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>   THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACT
           FROM THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE
           STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
           REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                 <C>                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-2000            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-2000            MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                    698                  3,532
<SECURITIES>                              872                  9,953
<RECEIVABLES>                          10,592                  8,111
<ALLOWANCES>                              341                    389
<INVENTORY>                             8,541                  5,160
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       22,293                 28,354
<PP&E>                                  9,028                  6,358
<DEPRECIATION>                          5,739                  3,750
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         34,754                 30,962
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   6,233                  4,480
<BONDS>                                     0                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0                      0
<PREFERRED>                                 0                      0
<COMMON>                                   10                     10
<OTHER-SE>                             28,511                 26,472
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           34,754                 30,962
<SALES>                                13,490                 11,560
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       13,490                 11,560
<CGS>                                   6,420                  5,809
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           6,420                  5,809
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        5,266                  4,228
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         1,831                  1,652
<INCOME-TAX>                              707                    628
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     1,154                  1,024
<DISCONTINUED>                              0                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0                      0
<CHANGES>                                   0                      0
<NET-INCOME>                            1,154                  1,024
<EPS-BASIC>                           $0.12                  $0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                           $0.12                  $0.11


</TABLE>
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0856.html[7/21/2015 4:45:07 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-9xn3

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0856

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

You guys amaze me. You seem to believe you are more wise, more capable, smarter, and have the right to

 control my retirement. WRONG. I reject your attempt to interfere with my freedom as an American. You have

 NO IDEA what is good for me.
###### Editorial Note on Part 572

#### Editorial Notes:

1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 572.20 Limbs.

The limbs consist of the assemblies shown on drawing SA 103C 001 as Nos. SA 103C 041, SA 103C 042, SA 103C 051, SA 103C 052, SA 103C 061, SA 103C 062, SA 103C 071, SA 103C 072, SA 103C 081, SA 103C 082, and conform to each of the applicable drawings listed under their respective numbers of the drawing SA 103C 002, sheets 12 through 21.
IV

★

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 197

Urging the President to reject any decree, proclamation, or treaty adopted

by the United Nations Conference on Small Arms and Light Weapons

which would infringe on the right of United States citizens under the

2nd amendment to the Constitution.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 17, 2001

Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland (for himself, Mr. BARR of Georgia, Mr.

HILLEARY, Mr. HOSTETTLER, Mr. REHBERG, Mr. PAUL, Mr. REYNOLDS,

Mr. ADERHOLT, and Mr. SCHAFFER) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition

to the Committee on International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

RESOLUTION

Urging the President to reject any decree, proclamation,

or treaty adopted by the United Nations Conference on

Small Arms and Light Weapons which would infringe

on the right of United States citizens under the 2nd

amendment to the Constitution.

1 Resolved, That—

2 (1) it is the sense of the House of Representa3 tives that the 2nd amendment to the United States

4 Constitution guarantees citizens the right to keep

5 and bear arms, and that any conference, resolution,
2

HRES 197 IH1S

1 or treaty of the United Nations infringing on this

2 right would be in conflict with article 6 of, and the

3 2nd amendment to, the United States Constitution;

4 and

5 (2) the House of Representatives urges the

6 President to reject any decree, proclamation, treaty,

7 or other official document adopted by the United

8 Nations Conference on Small Arms and Light Weap9 ons which would infringe on the right of United

10 States citizens under the 2nd amendment to the

11 Constitution.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1456

In re: ROBERTO ANTOINE DARDEN, a/k/a Dizz-e, a/k/a Javon,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (4:11-cr-00052-AWA-LRL-1)

Submitted: October 19, 2020 Decided: November 3, 2020

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roberto Antoine Darden, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Roberto Antoine Darden petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing 

the district court to unseal several documents in his criminal case. We conclude that 

Darden is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary 

circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004); In re Murphy-Brown, 

LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). Further, mandamus relief is available only when 

the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. Murphy-Brown, 907 F.3d at 795. 

Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 

F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007).

The relief sought by Darden is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, 

although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of 

mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
§ 523.3 Automobile. An automobile is any 4-wheeled vehicle that is propelled by fuel, or by alternative fuel, manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads, and highways and rated at less than 10,000 pounds gross vehicle weight, except: ( a ) A vehicle operated only on a rail line;
( b ) A vehicle manufactured in different stages by 2 or more manufacturers, if no intermediate or final-stage manufacturer of that vehicle manufactures more than 10,000 multi-stage vehicles per year; or
( c ) A work truck.
[89 FR 52945, June 24, 2024]
Adjusted
1st quarter 2024(p)/1820022/289204/15.9/-0.1/2.1/1.5/8.6
4th quarter 2023/1821361/283293/15.6/0.6/1.3/3.1/10.0
3rd quarter 2023/1811128/279739/15.4/1.3/2.5/2.4/9.5
2nd quarter 2023/1787398/272821/15.3/-0.3/2.4/0.7/8.5
1st quarter 2023/1792376/266314/14.9/1.5/3.4/3.5/7.6
Not Adjusted
1st quarter 2024(p)/1718447/268118/15.6/-9.2/-17.0/2.8/8.5
4th quarter 2023/1892581/322862/17.1/4.3/20.1/2.8/9.8
3rd quarter 2023/1815346/268745/14.8/-0.3/1.5/2.2/9.6
2nd quarter 2023/1820322/264857/14.6/8.9/7.2/0.6/8.5
1st quarter 2023/1671884/247176/14.8/-9.2/-15.9/3.5/7.7
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc.
(PNBC) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Tony J.
Sorcic, President & Chief Executive Officer of PNBC, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|    |                                                                                                                                                 
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies
 with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934; and                         
|    |                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained
 in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition
 and result of operations of PNBC.

|/s/ Tony J. Sorcic                   | 
|------------------------------------ | 
|                                     | 
|Tony J. Sorcic                       | 
|President & Chief
 Executive Officer | 
|                                     | 
|July 27, 2009                        | 

40

---
§ 299.307 Vegetation. Vegetation on railroad property which is on or immediately adjacent to roadbed shall be controlled so that it does not— ( a ) Become a fire hazard to track-carrying structures;
( b ) Obstruct visibility of railroad signs and signals along the right-of-way;
( c ) Interfere with railroad employees performing normal trackside duties;
( d ) Prevent proper functioning of signal and communication lines; or
( e ) Prevent railroad employees from visually inspecting moving equipment from their normal duty stations.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1919

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to the treatment

of certain personal care services under the unemployment tax.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 22, 1995

Mrs. MINK of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect

to the treatment of certain personal care services under

the unemployment tax.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PERSONAL CARE

4 SERVICES UNDER UNEMPLOYMENT TAX.

5 (a) TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PERSONAL CARE

6 SERVICES.—Subsection (c) of section 3306 of such Code

7 is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph (19),

8 by striking the period at the end of paragraph (20) and

9 inserting ‘‘; or’’, and by adding at the end thereof the fol10 lowing new paragraph:
2

•HR 1919 IH

1 ‘‘(21) services performed by an individual dur2 ing any period in providing personal attendance,

3 companionship, or household care services for any

4 individual if—

5 ‘‘(A) such services are performed in the

6 residence of such individual,

7 ‘‘(B) during such period, the individual

8 performing such services normally performs

9 such services for at least 5 individuals in their

10 residences, and

11 ‘‘(C) such services are not performed by

12 such individual while in the employ of another

13 person engaged in the trade or business of pro14 viding such services.’’

15 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (2) of

16 section 3306(c) of such Code is amended by inserting

17 ‘‘(not described in paragraph (21))’’ after ‘‘domestic serv18 ice’’ the first place it appears.

19 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

20 this section shall apply to remuneration paid in calendar

21 quarters ending after the date of the enactment of this

22 Act.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20

- 0 107

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL ALLEN ZEIMER

,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time,

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension

of time to and including February 1 8 , 202 1 , within which to prepare,

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 7 2021

01/07/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0107
§ 512.17 How long should it take to determine whether information is entitled to confidential treatment? ( a ) When information claimed to be confidential is requested under the Freedom of Information Act, the determination will be made within twenty (20) working days after NHTSA receives such a request or within thirty (30) working days in unusual circumstances as provided under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(A). However, these time periods may be extended by the Chief Counsel for good cause shown or on request from any person. An extension will be made in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(A), and will be accompanied by a written statement setting out the reasons for the extension.
( b ) When information claimed to be confidential is not requested under the Freedom of Information Act, the determination of confidentiality will be made within a reasonable period of time, at the discretion of the Chief Counsel.
Order filed, August 25, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00501-CV

____________

RENEE BAYLISS AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS, Appellant

V.

CRESCENT CITY APARTMENTS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Civil Ct at Law No 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1062489

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due July 31, 2015. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. 

The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not 

been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Gina Oliver, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

In connection with the Form 10-K of Tri-Valley Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, I, F. Lynn Blystone, Chief Executive Officer of Tri-Valley Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. **§** 1350 as adopted pursuant to **§** 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

|   | (1) | Such Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  Tri-Valley Corporation. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| Date:

 

  | March 30, 2009                                                         |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| By:                   | */s/F. Lynn Blystone***                                                |
|                  | F. Lynn Blystone, Chief Executive Officer CHOB

Tri-Valley Corporation |