alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          18,093
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             495
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 8,800
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     26,766
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           7,297
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             7,316
<LOANS>                                        139,366
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,856
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 204,108
<DEPOSITS>                                     187,660
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,109
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           13,963
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,514
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 204,108
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  9,348
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,176
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   600
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                11,124
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,220
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,224
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,900
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      724
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  19
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,748
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,327
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,327
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       838
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .58
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,920
<LOANS-PAST>                                        86
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,003
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      890
<RECOVERIES>                                        19
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,856
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.13 to Viper Powersports Inc. Form 10-KSB for fiscal year ended December 31, 2005






Exhibit 10.13 


VIPER MOTORCYCLE COMPANY

AMENDMENT TO

SECURED INVENTORY FINANCING AGREEMENT 



October 25, 2005
Amended March 21, 2006  



Original Principal Amount: $800,000

Amended Principal Amount: $1,500,000 



The parties hereto entered into a Secured Inventory Financing Agreement,
dated October 25, 2005 with Viper Motorcycle Company as the Maker and the undersigned Note holder, David W. Palmlund, III, in the
original principal amount of $800,000.00. 



FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION:

Maker and Note holder hereby agree to the following amendments to the terms of such Note: 



	  	Section 1:  






	  	(1) 	  	The principal financing amount from Lender shall be increased to
$1,250,000 as follows: 






	  	  	(A) 	  	Increase the principal amount to $1,250,000 immediately; and





	  	  	(B) 	  	An additional increase of $250,000 principal amount, as mutually
agreed by both parties. 






	  	Section 8:  






	  	(2)  	  	The term of the agreement set forth in Section 8 of the original
Note shall be amended, as follows: 






	  	“The Agreement shall expire August 31., 2006 or upon the
closing of any secondary financing with the parent company, Viper Powersports Inc., whichever occurs first.” 






	  	(3) 	  	All other terms and conditions of the original Note shall remain
in full force and effect. 






        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Note
Amendment was executed by the parties’ hereto effective March 21, 2006. 






	VIPER MOTORCYCLE COMPANY  		David W. Palmlund, Noteholder  
	 
	By:    	/s/   John Lai 
	    	By:   	/s/   David Palmlund 

	    	John Lai 	    	   	David Palmlund
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
PRINCETON NATIONAL BANCORP, INC. and Subsidiary Consolidated Balance Sheets and
Statements of Income and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          12,113
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         351,448
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,050
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     98,862
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          14,009
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            13,675
<LOANS>                                        320,717
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,416
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 475,229
<DEPOSITS>                                     397,232
<SHORT-TERM>                                    28,697
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,889
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,699
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,712
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 475,229
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,815
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,609
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    35
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,459
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,573
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,987
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,472
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      515
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (86)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,907
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,056
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       7,056
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,452
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.23
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.34
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,487
<LOANS-PAST>                                         9
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     24
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,950
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      128
<RECOVERIES>                                        79
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,416
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,416
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0




</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fisher Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I William W. Krippaehne Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





| | (1) |  | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Dated: November 14, 2002





/s/    William W. Krippaehne Jr.William W. Krippaehne Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer
From: Jack Cohen [mailto:jackcohen856@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 5:24 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

A major danger to retirees has already been investigated by the DOL through the ERISA 

Advisory Council. That danger is "De-Risking" and the associated negative aspects well 

documented by Mr. Edward Stone during his testimony (2015) as well as my own during the 

hearings of 2013. Still no sanctions or recommendation have I seen come out of the EAC. It is 

up to the individual states to initiate legislation which is mission impossible while the Insurance 

Lobby "owns" members of state insurance committees.

It is about time that Congress gets the courage to repeal McCarran-Ferguson, an outdated blank 

check given to the insurance industry in 1945. Sixty-eight years later, this act is responsible for 

the abdication of responsibility of the Federal Government to the States that are far from 

adequate to regulate this enormous giant of a lobby. They might have merited protection at that 

historic time. Today the "innocent child" of the War years has become a giant dragon having its 

abusive way with those insured and stepping upon any potential opposition or 

regulation. Retiree pensions, protected by the ERISA LAW and protected by the PBGC are 

being swept away in de-risking activities of major corporations. These pensions are becoming 

Group Annuities subject to the vagaries of the local State Insurance Guaranty Associations well 

documented in Mr. Stone's testimony.

Any attempt to repeal of McCarran-Ferguson will be fought by the Insurance Lobby with all the 

millions of dollars necessary to purchase our Congress. The question will be whether any MOC 

will have the courage to take this project on. I have such a cynical attitude in this regard. I am 

convinced that such courage no longer resides within the anatomy of anyone within our 

Government.

Jack Cohen

Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
Exhibit 24.16



POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, Edgar D. Jannotta do hereby appoint Frank M. Clark and J. Barry Mitchell, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on
my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2005 of Commonwealth Edison Company, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and
perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.





/s/ Edgar D. JannottaEdgar D. Jannotta




DATE: February 10, 2006
-----Original Message-----

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Dear Secretary Perez:

I am a licensed financial professional writing to share my concerns with the Department of Labor’s 

proposed fiduciary rule. After reviewing the proposal, I believe the rule will harm my clients by impeding 

their access to the products and advice they need to help them achieve a financially secure retirement.

I wholeheartedly agree with the Department’s goal to have financial professionals like me work in the 

best interest of retirement savers and provide transparency around compensation. Like most other 

financial professionals, I already work in the best interest of my clients, and therefore, I support 

establishing a best interest standard of care and requiring clear disclosures about financial professionals’ 

interests in the transactions they recommend.

 

Unfortunately, I have significant concerns about the rule as proposed. In particular, the rule would have 

the unintended effect of banning the sale of certain retirement products because of the requirements 

associated with the compensation provisions in the rule. I don’t understand how it would be possible to 

comply with these requirements unless the industry moves to level fees, which would skew the market 

by favoring some products based solely on fees, regardless of the overall benefit to the consumer.

Retirement products today use different fee structures to account for the benefits the product delivers 

to the consumer and the amount of work involved in helping my clients decide which product is right for 

them and providing them with ongoing assistance. This includes annuities, which are the only products 

that can provide Americans with retirement income they cannot outlive. This is why President Obama’s 

Middle-Class Task Force stated the Administration supports promoting annuities as a guaranteed 

lifetime income source to reduce "the risks that retirees will outlive their savings or that their living 

standards will be eroded by investment losses or inflation." If I can’t make annuities available to my 

clients merely because they have different fees, it will be impossible to always make recommendations 

that are in my clients’ best interest because, for many of them, annuities fill an important need.

Another concern I have is that the proposal would drive the market toward fee-based arrangements 

that are only available to wealthier investors due to account minimums. Many of my clients, like most 

middle-income retirement savers, would fail to meet these account balance requirements. As a result, 

they would be forced into no- and low-service, do-it-yourself retirement accounts, which would deprive 

them of meaningful, personalized retirement advice and limit their retirement planning options.

I urge the Department of Labor to rewrite the rule to apply a best interest standard and require 

appropriate disclosures while preserving American consumers’ retirement planning choices, education 

and access to advice.

Thank you for considering my comments.

Sincerely,
# December 29: Military airstrikes continue against ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published Dec. 29, 2016
December 29, 2016Release #20161229-02FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**SOUTHWEST ASIA —**On Dec. 28, Coalition military forces conducted 11 strikes against ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq. In Syria, Coalition military forces conducted eight strikes using attack, bomber, fighter and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL targets. Additionally in Iraq, Coalition military forces conducted three strikes coordinated with and in support of the government of Iraq using attack, fighter, and remotely piloted aircraft as well as rocket artillery against ISIL targets.**Syria**.       Near Abu Kamal, one strike destroyed an oil well head..       Near Ar Raqqah, six strikes engaged five ISIL tactical units; destroyed a fighting position, a heavy machine gun, a mortar system, and a vehicle; and disabled a bridge..       Near Palmyra, one strike destroyed an ISIL-held tank.**Iraq**.       Near Mosul, three strikes engaged an ISIL tactical unit; destroyed seven front-end loaders, four command and control nodes, two land bridges, a VBIED factory, a vehicle, and a steam roller; and damaged 24 supply routes.Strike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely.A strike, as defined in the CJTF releases, means one or more kinetic events that occur in roughly the same geographic location to produce a single, sometimes cumulative effect for that location.So having a single aircraft deliver a single weapon against a lone ISIL vehicle is one strike, but so is multiple aircraft delivering dozens of weapons against a group of buildings and vehicles and weapon systems in a compound, for example, having the cumulative effect of making that facility (or facilities) harder or impossible to use.Accordingly, CJTF-OIR does not report the number or type of aircraft employed in a strike, the number of munitions dropped in each strike, or the number of individual munition impact points against a target. The information used to compile the daily strike releases is based on 'Z' or Greenwich Mean Time.Ground-based artillery fired in counter-fire or in fire support to maneuver roles are not classified as a strike as defined by CJTF-OIR.The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria, and the wider international community.The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have conducted strikes in Iraq include Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Coalition nations which have conducted strikes in Syria include Australia, Bahrain, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, the Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
From: Frank Obeda [mailto:jaspero116@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 5:09 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

I am vehemently opposed to the government directing me to convert any part of my 

retirement assets into some form of annuity. Voluntary contributions to my 401K 

were invested as per my instructions and I prefer to keep it that way. 

Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. Sign up now.
§ 551.53 What is the required format for a designation? ( a ) All documents submitted under this subpart must be: ( 1 ) Original documents;
( 2 ) Written in English; and
( 3 ) Signed in ink.
( b ) For each signature, the document must indicate in English: ( 1 ) The date of signature; and
( 2 ) The name and title of the individual who signed the document.
( c ) As long as documents submitted by a foreign manufacturer and its agent contain all required information (identified in §§ 551.54, 551.55 and 551.56 below), there is no mandatory format for the designation
( d ) NHTSA encourages foreign manufacturers to use the suggested designation form set forth in the appendix to this subpart. If completed and executed properly by both a foreign manufacturer and its agent, this form will comply fully with the requirements of §§ 551.53 through 551.65.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of CEO Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Comprehensive Care Corporation(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 27, 2009 (the “Report”), John M. Hill, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to Comprehensive Care Corporation and will be retained by Comprehensive Care Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

94
H. Res. 359

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 7, 2002.

Resolved,

SECTION 1. FURTHER EXPENSES OF THE PERMANENT SELECT

COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE.

For further expenses of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, there shall be paid out of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives not more than

$1,600,000.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION.

Amounts shall be available under this resolution for expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on January 3, 2002, and ending immediately before noon on January 3, 2003.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized by the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, signed by the chairman of such committee, and approved in the manner directed by the Committee on House

Administration.
2

•HRES 359 EH

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

Amounts made available under this resolution shall be

expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by the

Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 5. ADJUSTMENT AUTHORITY.

The Committee on House Administration shall have authority to make adjustments in amounts under section 1, if

necessary to comply with an order of the President issued

under section 254 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency

Deficit Control Act of 1985 or to conform to any reduction

in appropriations for the purposes of such section 1.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 551.51 May an agent assign performance of its functions to another individual or entity?

No, an agent may not assign performance of its functions.
Exhibit 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Hampton's Luxury Homes, Inc..
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roy
Dalene, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
         of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Roy Dalene
Roy Dalene
Chief Executive Officer
June 9, 2005