alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM NORWEST FINANCIAL INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         118,235
<SECURITIES>                                   985,724
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,022,580
<ALLOWANCES>                                   173,180
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         177,357
<DEPRECIATION>                                  94,842
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,901,250
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                      6,117,969<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,855
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,296,276
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,901,250
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               767,893
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               281,087
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                99,376
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             185,813
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                201,617
<INCOME-TAX>                                    70,531
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   131,086
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>NORWEST FINANCIAL INC. HAS A NON-CLASSIFIED BALANCE
SHEET SO THIS INFORMATION IS UNAVAILABLE.
<F2>INCLUDES $2.0 BILLION OF SHORT-TERM LOANS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of Charles C. Tiffany, Deceased. Charles P. Howland et al., as Executors, Appellants; The Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent.

*Matter of Tiffany,*143 App. Div. 827, affirmed.

(Argued April 25, 1911;

decided May 9, 1911.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered *551March 10,1911, which affirmed an order of the New York County Surrogate’s Court assessing a transfer tax upon the estate of Charles 0. Tiffany, deceased.

*Charles P. Howland*and *William Roberts for*appellants.

*Henry A. Miller*and *John S. Jenkins*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion of McLaughlin, J., below.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ. Absent: Gray, J.
N. Y. COMMON PLEAS.

#### Charles Devlin agt. The Mayor, etc., and others.

*Referees’ fees—disqmlijication of referee.*

Where one counsel refuses to assent to an agreement for the payment of more than the statutory referee’s fees, the only course for the referee is to proceed with the reference at the statutory rate of compensation, or to decline to act.

A referee is disqualified from going on with a reference after having imposed conditions as to fees in excess of those provided by statute, which was assented to by one suitor, but refused by the other *(Reversing 8. 0., ante,*64).

*General Term,*January, 1878.

Appeal from order of Special Term denying motion to substitute new referee in place of Hon. William H. Leonard, who required a stipulation from the parties for the payment of the customary charge of five dollars an hour as referee, instead of the *per diem*allowance of three dollars, without stipulation.

*William O.*Bartlett, for the mayor, &c.

*J. J. Marrin and T. C. Cronin,,*opposed.

By the Court.

The statute has fixed the amount of the referee’s fees, unless the parties agree to have a larger sum. They did not agree in this case. The counsel for the corporation refused to assent to any agreement for the payment of more than the statutory fees. The only course then *384for the referee was to proceed with the reference at the statutory rate of compensation or' decline to act. This was not his decision.' He decided that he would try the case, and, after it was submitted and his decision prepared, that he would notify the prevailing party, *“*when he should expect to charge the customary fee of five dollars an hour and five dollars for every adjournment, which he should expect the prevailing party to pay, and should consider himself entitled to hold his report as security until that amount was paid, unless the court should order him to deliver it without such payment.”

We are of opinion that he could impose no such conditions. It was placing the counsel of the corporation in a very unpleasant position to require him to go on and try the case with that understanding, after his opponent had agreed, and he had refused to agree, to the rate of compensation above named.

It would not, we feel certain, have in any way affected the decision of the referee, but we are of opinion that a suitor cannot or ought not to be required to go on and try a cause before a referee under such circumstances. In our opinion he has a right, as' he may be liable for the payment of the fees, to require that the referee shall act for the compensation fixed by the statute, or that a new referee be appointed. We think, therefore, that the motion should have been granted, and that the court should have appointed another referee. The order appealed from should, therefore, be reversed.
[Crim. No. 3485.

Second Dist., Div. Two.

Sept. 24, 1941.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. CLARK STEVENS, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellant.

Earl Warren, Attorney General, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

On July 17,1941, the transcripts on appeal were filed in this court. Thereafter, the time for filing briefs having elapsed, an order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed was issued, returnable September 24, 1941. On the latter date there was no appearance on behalf of appellant, either by brief or otherwise.

Therefore, pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code, the judgment of the trial court hereby is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 272 Reported in House (RH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 272

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2311) making appropriations for energy and water development 
 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

             October 31 (legislative day, October 30), 2001

   Mr. Sessions, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2311) making appropriations for energy and water development 
 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
2311) making appropriations for energy and water development for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, and for other purposes. All 
points of order against the conference report and against its 
consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as 
read.
                                 <all>
```
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - Quantex Capital Corp. - Exhibit 10.18






 

April 1, 2005

	To: 	L. Evan Baergen 
	  	Suite 205, 4840 Delta Street 
	  	Delta, BC V4K 2T6 


Re:      Option Agreement dated
December 31, 2004 between L. Evan Baergen, Quantex Capital
Corporation (formerly Beddis International Ltd.), 0709355 B.C.
Ltd.

Pursuant to the Option Agreement referred to above, Quantex
Capital Corporation hereby exercises its option to purchase all of the
outstanding shares of 0709355 B.C. Ltd., effectively immediately.

Yours truly,
QUANTEX CAPITAL CORPORATION

 

	/s/ Matt Reams	 
	Per: Matt Reams, Director 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	/s/ L. Evan Baergen 	 
	Acknowledged by L. Evan Baergen
**RB** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19
- 0 33 4 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CECIL LEE RUSSELL ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 3 0
- day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including June 12 , 2020 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 6 2020

05/06/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0334
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED JOSEPH M. DENNIS,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D 17

- 4033 STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion file d February 20, 2018 3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County , Howard M. Maltz , Judge. Joseph M. Dennis, Raiford, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Robbinson v. State, 784 So. 2d 1246, 1247 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (holding Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), does not apply to Florida ’s habitual offender statute).

ORFINGER , WALLIS and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
# 2014

# 2013

# 2012

# 2011

# 2010

# 2009

# 2008

# 2007

# 2006

# 2005

# 2004

# 2003

# 2002

# 2001

# 2000

# 1999

# 1998

# 1997

# 1996

# 1995

# 1994

# 1993

# 1992
EXHIBIT 21


                          FIRSTENERGY CORP.

               LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT








                       AT DECEMBER 31, 1998


Ohio Edison Company - Incorporated in Ohio
The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company - Incorporated in Ohio
The Toledo Edison Company - Incorporated in Ohio
Centerior Service Company - Incorporated in Ohio
FirstEnergy Properties Company - Incorporated in Ohio
FirstEnergy Ventures Corporation - Incorporated in Ohio
FirstEnergy Trading & Power Marketing, Inc. - Incorporated in Delaware
FirstEnergy Facilities Services Group, Inc. - Incorporated in Ohio
FirstEnergy Securities Transfer Company - Incorporated in Ohio
FirstEnergy Services Corp. - Incorporated in Ohio
MARBEL Energy Corporation - Incorporated in Ohio
JR Operating Company - Incorporated in Ohio
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company - Incorporated in Ohio
FirstEnergy Holdings, LLC - Incorporated in Ohio
FE Acquisition Corp. - Incorporated in Ohio
American Transmission Systems, Inc. - Incorporated in Ohio




                     Statement of Differences
                     ------------------------


Exhibit Number 21, List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant at
December 31, 1998, is not included in the printed document.
1210-AB32-2-1527.html[7/26/2015 6:52:12 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwo-1k8t

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2024

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Gregory Wolfe

General Comment

I can handle my own investments!!!
Exhibit 24.2



POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, M. Walter DAlessio do hereby appoint John W. Rowe and Randall E. Mehrberg, or either of them, attorney for me and in
my name and on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2006 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and
perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.



/s/ M. Walter DAlessioM. Walter DAlessio




DATE: February 7, 2007
§ 30.11 Use of solicitation provisions and contract clauses. ( a ) Unless the President or the Secretary waives the restrictions imposed by section 109(a) of the Continuing Resolution in accordance with § 30.17 of this part, the contracting officer shall insert a clause similar to the clause at § 30.15, Restrictions on Federal Public Works Projects, in contractions and solicitations, if— ( 1 ) The contract is awarded on or after December 22, 1987, and before October 1, 1988; and
( 2 ) The contract obligates funds appropriated for use in FY 1988 by the Continuing Resolution or any other law; and
( 3 ) The contract is for the acquisition of construction, alteration and repair, architectural, engineering, or other services directly related to the preparation for, or performance of, construction, alteration, and repair for Federal public works projects inside the United States, U.S. territories, or U.S. possessions.
( b ) Unless the Secretary waives the restrictions imposed by section 115 of the Airport Safety Act in accordance with § 30.17 of this part, the contracting officer shall insert a clause similar to the clause at § 30.15, Restrictions on Federal Public Works Projects, in contracts and solicitations relating to any project for which funds, including grant funds, are made available by that Act, whether or not the contract is awarded during fiscal year 1988.
( c ) Any contract already awarded that should have contained the clause prescribed in paragraph (a) or (b) of this section, but did not, shall be modified to include the clause. In the event that the contracting officer is unable to modify such contract, the contract shall be canceled at no cost to the Government, unless a waiver is granted in accordance with § 30.17 of this part.
( d ) Contracting officers shall insert a provision similar to the solicitation provision at § 30.13 of this part, Restrictions on Public Works Projects—Certification, in solicitations containing the clause at § 30.15 of this part, Restrictions on Federal Public Works Projects.
( e ) Any solicitation issued before December 22, 1987, that will result in the award of a contract covered by paragraph (a) of this section after December 22, 1987, and before October 1, 1988, and that should have contained a provision similar to that § 30.13 of this part, but did not, shall be amended to include the provision if the contract has not yet been awarded.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 299 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 103
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 299

                          [Report No. 107-309]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
     bill (H.R. 2299) making appropriations for the Department of 
    Transportation and related agencies for the fiscal year ending 
              September 30, 2002, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

            November 30 (legislative day, November 29), 2001

   Mr. Reynolds, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
 resolution which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
     bill (H.R. 2299) making appropriations for the Department of 
    Transportation and related agencies for the fiscal year ending 
              September 30, 2002, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
2299) making appropriations for the Department of Transportation and 
related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, and for 
other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and 
against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be 
considered as read.

                                                 House Calendar No. 103

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 299

                          [Report No. 107-309]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
     bill (H.R. 2299) making appropriations for the Department of 
    Transportation and related agencies for the fiscal year ending 
              September 30, 2002, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

            November 30 (legislative day, November 29), 2001

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 21
                 COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                      Exhibit 21 - Schedule of Subsidiaries

As of May 31, 2000, the Company had the following active subsidiaries:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
     <S>                                                                        <C>
     WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARIES OF COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION:               STATE OF INCORPORATION
     ------------------------------------------------------------               ----------------------

     Comprehensive Behavioral Care, Inc.                                              Nevada
     Comprehensive Health Associates, Inc.                                            Puerto Rico

     WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARIES OF COMPREHENSIVE BEHAVIORAL CARE, INC.:
     -----------------------------------------------------------------

     Comprehensive Care Integration, Inc.                                             Delaware
     Healthcare Management Services, Inc.                                             Michigan
     Healthcare Management Services of Michigan, Inc.                                 Michigan
     Behavioral Healthcare Management, Inc.                                           Michigan

     AFFILIATES SPONSORED BY COMPREHENSIVE BEHAVIORAL CARE, INC.:
     ------------------------------------------------------------

     Comprehensive Provider Networks of Texas, Inc.                                   Texas

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.8

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT FOR SHAWN WILLIAMS WITH THE SEREFEX CORPORATION

POSITION:     CONTROLLER

SALARY AGREEMENT:

$40,000.00 Start               $10,000.00 COST FOR 1ST 90 DAYS
                                        Feb. 16, 2004-May 15, 2004

$50,000.00 At 3 Months         $12,500.00 COST FOR 2ND 90 DAYS
                                        May 16, 2004-Aug. 13, 2004

$60,000.00 At 6 Months         $15,000.00 COST FOR 3RD 90 DAYS
                                        Aug. 14, 2004-Nov. 11, 2004

$70,000.00 At 9 Months         $17,500.00 COST FOR 4TH 90 DAYS
                                        Nov. 12, 2004-Feb. 9, 2005

$80,000.00 At 12 Months        STARTING FEB. 10, 2005

SHARE AGREEMENT:

250,000  Shares  at  time  of  hire  (Feb.  16,  2004).
250,000  Shares  at  one-year  anniversary  date  (Feb.  10,  2005).

*    Should  I  terminate my employment at my own will for any reason except for
     the following: a) Serefex does not comply with the terms of this agreement;
     I  will  return  the  250,000  shares  received  at  time  of  hire.

*    Should  Serefex  terminate  my employment after 180 days from original hire
     date  or my position eliminated for any reason except for the following: a)
     I  knowingly and willingly endanger the lives of others. b) I knowingly and
     willingly misrepresented my abilities to Serefex or misrepresent Serefex; I
     will  receive  the  additional  250,000  shares  at  time  of my departure.

OTHER TERMS:

2    Weeks paid vacation (not to be taken in succession).
Heath  Insurance  -  None
Paid  Holidays  -  9  (New Years Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day,
Thanksgiving  and  the  Friday that follows, Christmas Eve, Christmas Day, & New
Years  Eve)
Paid  Sick  Days  -  2
Paid  Personal  days  -  2
Hours  Of  Operation-M-F  8am  to  5pm
Required  Overtime-On  an  as  needed  basis.


Start Date: 2/16/04


/S/  Shawn Williams                           /S/  Brian Dunn
-------------------                           ---------------
Shawn Williams            Date                Brian Dunn             Date
                                              President
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1073.html[7/22/2015 7:35:04 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-a6nt

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1073

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Krys Crouch

General Comment

I am opposed the EBSA proposed rule. I do not want nor need the U.S. government to manage my retirement

 accounts. Government continues to push it's way into areas of my personal life that supersedes it's authority. I

 am perfectly capable of managing my own affairs, choosing a reliable adviser and understanding the terms and

 cost of the services which the advisor presents to me. .