alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICERS PERQUISITES



Exhibit 10.37


Officer Benefits

UAL Corporation and United Air Lines, Inc.

Travel Benefits

Positive - space travel on United Airlines or United Express is provided
to officers of UAL Corporation and United Airlines and their eligible dependents,
and cash payments are made to federal and state tax authorities on behalf
of each officer to cover tax liability on the value of travel benefits. 
This benefit includes membership to United's Red Carpet Club.

Financial Advisory Services

Financial advisory tax preparation services are provided to designated
officers of UAL and United.  Reimbursement is limited to $7,000 in
the first year the officer is eligible for to the program and to $4,000
per year thereafter.  Unused reimbursements may be carried over and
used in succeeding years.

Club Memberships

Payment is made by United for the cost of social and business club memberships
for designated officers where there is a benefit to be realized by the
company.  The Company does not pay dues for clubs, which discriminate
on the basis of race, sex, religion or national origin.  Such memberships
are authorized by the Chairman consistent with long-standing company policies.

Welfare Benefits

Officers receive a company paid group variable universal life insurance
program which provides for insurance in an amount equal to three times
base salary. The premium is paid by United.

Officers are eligible to enroll in 24-Hour Accidental Death and Dismemberment
(AD&D) insurance coverage which pays up to a $500,000 benefit upon
the accidental death or dismemberment of the insured.

Officers are provided a self-insured supplemental long-term disability
plan, which provides a supplement to the Company's disability benefit for
certain management employees equal to 50% of monthly pay in excess of $20,000.

Company Cars

The Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and certain other
senior officers are entitled to the use of cars owned or leased by United.
For 2005, the Company did not own or lease any cars for the use of an individual
executive, other than the Chief Executive Officer.
Docket Number FAA-2014-0394

Directorate ID 2014-SW-015-AD

Economic Evaluation

We estimate that this AD will affect 118 helicopters of U.S. Registry. We 

estimate that operators may incur the following costs in order to comply with this AD. At 

an average labor rate of $85 per hour, repairing the hoist damper unit will require 5 workhours, and required parts will cost $4, for a cost per helicopter of $429. Replacing the 

hoist damper unit will require 1 work-hour, and required parts will cost $8,715, for a cost 

per helicopter of $8,800. Deactivating the rescue hoist will require .5 work-hour, for a 

cost per helicopter of $43.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0888.html[7/21/2015 5:13:29 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-93bl

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0888

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I don't need the government telling me how to plan for my retirement
[No. 1308.]

#### Amter v. The Woods Investment Co.

Practice — Forcible Entry and Detainer — Appeal Bond.

In an appeal from a justice of the peace to the county court from a judgment against the defendant in an action of forcible entry and detainer, where the appellant failed to give an additional bond for the use and occupancy of the premises as required by the act of 1891, it was not erroneous for the county court to refuse to allow such bond to be filed in that court or permit the original bond to be amended.

*Appeal from the County Court of JJl Paso County.*

Mr. J. E. Robinson, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Bissell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The Woods Investment Company were the owners of some property in the town of Victor, which was occupied by the appellant, Amter, as a tenant. Under circumstances which it is needless to state, the company claimed that the tenancy was terminated, gave Amter notice to quit and on his refusal brought an action of forcible entry and detainer before a justice of the peace to recover possession. An adverse judgment was entered against Amter, who appealed to the county court *543and gave a bond to perfect his appeal, which contained the statutory conditions, with possibly others. It is unimportant to notice what these conditions were. The bond was approved by the justice. Under the act of 1885, this was enough, but the forcible entry and detainer act was amended in 1891, and in cases like that at bar, that statute prescribes that the tenant must give an independent bond to cover the value of the use and occupancy of the premises. The latter bond was not executed. In the county court the appellee moved to dismiss the appeal, and the court dismissed it, and from this judgment the appeal is prosecuted.

. In the county court Amter asked leave to file a bond to comply with the statute. This application was denied, and he insists here that the county court erred in refusing to permit him to file it, and erred when it refused leave to amend the bond already given by inserting further conditions which would make it in his judgment conform to the act of 1891. It would subserve no useful purpose to re-examine this question, and re-express the reasons upon which a different rule has been established. The whole subject was fully considered at the last term of this court in an opinion of the president judge. *Getty v. Miller, ante,*p. 331.

This opinion contains a clear and satisfactory exposition of the statute, and the reasons expressed neither need revision nor enlargement. On the strength of that authority, the judgment in this case must of necessity be affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-4601

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DARREN GERARD MCKEE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:11-cr-00154-NCT-1)

Submitted: April 27, 2021 Decided: April 30, 2021

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James B. Craven, III, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellant. Sandra J. Hairston, Acting 

United States Attorney, Michael F. Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF 

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Darren Gerard McKee appeals the district court’s judgment revoking his term of

supervised release and sentencing him to 7 months in prison, followed by a 14-year term 

of supervised release. McKee contends that the district court did not adequately consider 

his arguments for a lesser term of imprisonment. We affirm.

“A district court has broad discretion when imposing a sentence upon revocation of 

supervised release. [We] will affirm a revocation sentence if it is within the statutory 

maximum and is not plainly unreasonable.” United States v. Patterson, 957 F.3d 426, 436 

(4th Cir. 2020). “When reviewing whether a revocation sentence is plainly unreasonable, 

we must first determine whether it is unreasonable at all.” United States v. Thompson, 595 

F.3d 544, 546 (4th Cir. 2010). 

“A revocation sentence is procedurally reasonable if the district court adequately 

explains the chosen sentence after considering the Sentencing Guidelines’ nonbinding 

Chapter Seven policy statements and the applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors.” United 

States v. Slappy, 872 F.3d 202, 207 (4th Cir. 2017) (footnotes and citation omitted); see 18 

U.S.C. § 3583(c) (listing § 3553(a) factors relevant to revocation sentences). A sentence 

is substantively reasonable if the district court states a proper basis for concluding that the 

defendant should receive the sentence imposed, up to the statutory maximum. United 

States v. Crudup, 461 F.3d 433, 440 (4th Cir. 2006). A sentence within the applicable 

policy statement range is presumed reasonable. United States v. Padgett, 788 F.3d 370, 

373 (4th Cir. 2015). Applying these standards, we conclude that McKee’s 7-month 
3

sentence—within the applicable 4- to 10-month policy statement range—is neither 

procedurally nor substantively unreasonable.

We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.225 What form is used for an alcohol test? ( a ) The DOT Alcohol Testing Form (ATF) must be used for every DOT alcohol test. The ATF must be a three-part carbonless manifold form. The ATF is found in appendix I to this part. You may view this form on the ODAPC web site (*http://www.transportation.gov/odapc*).
( b ) As an employer in the DOT alcohol testing program, you are not permitted to modify or revise the ATF except as follows: ( 1 ) You may include other information needed for billing purposes, outside the boundaries of the form.
( 2 ) You may use a ATF directly generated by an EBT which omits the space for affixing a separate printed result to the ATF, provided the EBT prints the result directly on the ATF.
( 3 ) You may use an ATF that has the employer's name, address, and telephone number preprinted. In addition, a C/TPA's name, address, and telephone number may be included, to assist with negative results.
( 4 ) You may use an ATF in which all pages are printed on white paper. You may modify the ATF by using colored paper, or have clearly discernable borders or designation statements on Copy 2 and Copy 3. When colors are used, they must be green for Copy 2 and blue for Copy 3.
( 5 ) As a BAT or STT, you may add, on the “Remarks” line of the ATF, the name of the DOT agency under whose authority the test occurred.
( 6 ) As a BAT or STT, you may use a ATF that has your name, address, and telephone number preprinted, but under no circumstances can your signature be preprinted.
( c ) As an employer, you may use an equivalent foreign-language version of the ATF approved by ODAPC. You may use such a non-English language form only in a situation where both the employee and BAT/STT understand and can use the form in that language.
[65 FR 79526, Dec. 19, 2000, as amended at 66 FR 41954, Aug. 9, 2001; 75 FR 8529, Feb. 25, 2010; 75 FR 13009, Mar. 18, 2010; 82 FR 52246, Nov. 13, 2017; 88 FR 27649, May 2, 2023]
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 159 (Friday, August 18, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 56661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-17948]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-23-039]


Sunshine Act Meetings

    Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE: August 25, 2023 at 11:00 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
1. Agendas for future meetings: none.
2. Minutes.
3. Ratification List.
4. Commission vote on Inv. Nos. 701-TA-692 and 731-TA-1628 
(Preliminary)(Pea Protein from China). The Commission currently is 
scheduled to complete and file its determinations on August 28, 2023; 
views of the Commission currently are scheduled to be completed and 
filed on September 5, 2023.
5. Outstanding action jackets: none.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sharon Bellamy, Acting Supervisory 
Hearings and Information Officer, 202-205-2000.
    The Commission is holding the meeting under the Government in the 
Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b). In accordance with Commission policy, 
subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, 
may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission:
    Issued: August 16, 2023.
Sharon Bellamy,
Acting Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023-17948 Filed 8-16-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
#### § 538.3 Applicability.

This part applies to manufacturers of automobiles.
EXHIBIT 32.1

           CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 The undersigned, Garrett Sullivan, the Chief Financial Officer of
Cognitronics Corporation (the "Company"), has executed this
certification in connection with the filing with the Securities
and Exchange Commission of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and results
     of operations of the Company.


DATED this 29th day of March 2004.

/s/ Garrett Sullivan
--------------------
Garrett Sullivan

Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
<PAGE>  81


                                                                EXHIBIT 23.2

                       Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-52378, No. 333-59251 and No. 2-64572) of
Coachmen Industries, Inc. of our report dated February 2, 2001, except for the
information in Note 5, for which the date is February 9, 2001, and Note 11, for
which the date is February 12, 2001, relating to the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule for the year ended December 31,
2000, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/S/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
March 21, 2003
#### § 236.512 Cab signal indication when locomotive enters block where restrictive conditions obtain.

The automatic cab signal system shall be arranged so that when a locomotive enters or is within a block, wherein any condition described in § 236.205 obtains, the cab signals shall indicate “Proceed at Restricted Speed.”
###### Editorial Note on Part 391

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 391 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 391.27 [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Part 385

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 385.331 What happens if a new entrant operates a CMV after having been issued an order placing its interstate operations out of service?

A new entrant that operates a CMV in violation of an out-of-service order is subject to the penalty provisions in 49 U.S.C. 521(b)(2)(A) for each offense as adjusted for inflation by 49 CFR part 386, appendix B.

[73 FR 76491, Dec. 16, 2008]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, September 12, 1995 (113), Para 113.14 Small Business Credit Efficiency]
[Page 1323]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.113.14  small business credit efficiency

  Mrs. MEYERS moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 2150) 
to amend the Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 
1958 to reduce the cost to the Federal Government of guaranteeing 
certain loans and debentures, and for other purposes, as amended.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, recognized Mrs. MEYERS and Mr. 
POSHARD, each for 20 minutes.
  After debate,
  The question being put, viva voce,
  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill, as amended?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, announced that two-thirds of the 
Members present had voted in the affirmative.
  Mr. POSHARD objected to the vote on the ground that a quorum was not 
present and not voting.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, pursuant to clause 5, rule I, 
announced that further proceedings on the motion were postponed.
  The point of no quorum was considered as withdrawn.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7753 

JOHN C. PATTERSON, 

Petitioner – Appellant, 

v. 

WARDEN FCI WILLIAMSBURG, 

Respondent – Appellee, 

and 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Greenville. Richard Mark Gergel, District 

Judge. (6:10-cv-02408-RMG) 

Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 23, 2011

Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

John C. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

John C. Patterson, a federal prisoner, appeals the 

district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the 

magistrate judge and denying relief on Patterson’s 28 U.S.C.A. 

§ 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Patterson v. Warden 

FCI Williamsburg, No. 6:10-cv-02408-RMG (D.S.C. Nov. 29, 2010). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Editorial Note on Part 391
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 391 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 391.62 Limited exemptions for intra-city zone drivers. The provisions of §§ 391.11(b)(1) and 391.41(b)(1) through (b)(11) do not apply to a person who: ( a ) Was otherwise qualified to operate and operated a commercial motor vehicle in a municipality or exempt intracity zone thereof throughout the one-year period ending November 18, 1988;
( b ) Meets all the other requirements of this section;
( c ) Operates wholly within the exempt intracity zone (as defined in 49 CFR 390.5);
( d ) Does not operate a vehicle used in the transportation of hazardous materials in a quantity requiring placarding under regulations issued by the Secretary under 49 U.S.C. chapter 51.; and
( e ) Has a medical or physical condition which: ( 1 ) Would have prevented such person from operating a commercial motor vehicle under the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations contained in this subchapter;
( 2 ) Existed on July 1, 1988, or at the time of the first required physical examination after that date; and
( 3 ) The examining physician has determined this condition has not substantially worsened since July 1, 1988, or at the time of the first required physical examination after that date.
[61 FR 13346, Mar. 26, 1996; 61 FR 17253, Apr. 19, 1996]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RegeneRx (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J.J. Finkelstein, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
presented in this report.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 14, 2007



/s/ J.J. FINKELSTEINChief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 10:30 a.m. and its continuation at the conclusion of the open meeting on August 30, 2023.

# PLACE:

1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC and virtual (This meeting will be a hybrid meeting).

# STATUS:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 30109.

Information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to have a considerable adverse effect on the implementation of a proposed Commission action.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

* * * * *

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer; Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Laura E. Sinram,

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2023-18040 Filed 8-17-23; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
-----Original Message-----

Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2015 4:13 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Attn Conflict of Interest Rule Staff

I feel that all financial advisers, brokers and insurance agents should abide by fiduciary standards.

Expanding the fiduciary standards to all advisers is especially important with the large number of baby 

boomers retiring.

Thank you for your time and attention in this matter.

Sincerely,

M Westbrook
From: Jean Pautz [mailto:JeanP@hcmiller.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 12:52 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Fiduciary Definition Hearing

As the Human Resource Coordinator for the HC Miller Company in Green Bay, WI, I would like to 

go on record being against revising the definition of “fiduciary” due to the increased liabilities to 

our company. At a time when companies are struggling to remain viable, an added liability only 

makes it more difficult to sustain a business in today’s economic climate.

 

 

Jean C. Pautz, SPHR

Human Resources Coordinator

HC Miller Company

3030 Lowell Drive

Green Bay, WI 54311

HC Miller an Employee Owned Company 

Experience the Difference Employee Ownership Makes