alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT.

#### David Thompson *et*al., executors, agt. Lesser Friedberg.

*Orders of a/rrest—what to he stated in com/plaint—order to be subscribed by attorney—what surety in undertaking should swewr*to— *Code of Civil Procedure, sections*561, 563, 558 *and*813.

Where the arrest proceeds upon the fact that the defendant had removed or secreted his property with the intent to defraud his creditors, it is extrinsic to the cause of action, and not to be stated in the complaint *(Following Williams*agt. *Norton, ante*509, *and is adverse to Bowery National Bank*agt. *Buryea, ante*450).

The order of arrest must be subscribed by the attorney. The statute *(Code of Civil Procedwre, secs.*561, 563) upon this subject is imperative. The surety in an undertaking, for the purpose of obtaining 'an order of arrest, must make an affidavit (which is to be attached to the undertaking) in the form required by section 813 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Where the surety neglects to swear that he is worth the amount specified in the affidavit, exclusive of the property exempt from levy and sale under execution, the affidavit is defective, and for this defect the order of arrest will be set aside.

*Special*Term, April, 1878.

Motion to set aside order of arrest.

Daniels, *J*.

The affidavits, taken together, support the conclusion on which thé order of arrest was made, that the defendant had removed or secreted his property with the intent to defraud his creditors. When the arrest proceeds upon that fact, it is extrinsic to the cause of actión, and not to be stated in the complaint. That rule of practice has become perfectly well settled at the present time. The order of arrest should *520have been subscribed by the plaintiff’s attorney (Code, *secs.*561, 562). The statute upon this subject is imperative. It has not been complied with in this case. The surety in the undertaking should also have sworn that ■ he was worth the amount specified in the affidavit, exclusive of property exempt from levy and sale under execution. That was omitted in the affidavit which was attached to the undertaking for the purpose of obtaining the order of arrest; For these defects the order of arrest must be set aside, unless within five days after notice of this decision the order of arrest be subscribed by the plaintiff’s attorney, and a copy so subscribed be also delivered to the defendant or his attorney, and an affidavit be attached to the undertaking in the form required by section 812 of the Code; and the plaintiff pay the ■ defendant’s attorney ten dollars costs of this action.
1210-AB32-2-1231.html[7/24/2015 9:14:47 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvt-onzz

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1726

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Tami Anonymous

General Comment

Americans do not want our retirement plans to be regulated. We do not need government dictating what we can

 or cannot do with our hard earned money saved for retirement. Dear US government, keep out of Americans

 retirement choices & funds! You got your cut of our money when we earned it. Leave our retirement funds &

 decisions alone!
From: Bryon Rossi [mailto:bryonrossi@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 5:41 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: lifetime income distribution

To Whom It May Concern, 

I have absolutely no interest in participating or allowing any form of "lifetime income 

distribution" being explored by the U.S. Government right now. I will personally 

encourage my congressmen and senator to vote against any bills introducing such 

legislation. And I will also work with other like-minded citizens to educate the public 

and encourage them to let their congressmen and senators to vote against such a 

proposal. 

Bryon Rossi
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0920.html[7/21/2015 6:12:10 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-6x36

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0920

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Monica Schweinberger

Address:

312 West 6th Avenue

Cheyenne, WY, 82001

Email: mhs70@msn.com

General Comment

I am fully capable of managing my own retirement accounts (i.e. 401 K and IRA). I do NOT want the

 government imposing regulations on how I manage these accounts.
#### § 583.2 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to aid potential purchasers in the selection of new passenger motor vehicles by providing them with information about the value of the U.S./Canadian and foreign parts content of each vehicle, the countries of origin of the engine and transmission, and the site of the vehicle's final assembly.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION

                            SCHEDULE OF SUBSIDIARIES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     STATE OF
SUBSIDIARY NAME                                    INCORPORATION

<S>                                                <C>
Comprehensive Care Corporation                       Delaware
Comprehensive Behavioral Care, Inc.                  Nevada
Healthcare Management Services, Inc.                 Michigan
Healthcare Management Services of Michigan, Inc.     Michigan
Healthcare Management Services of Ohio, Inc.         Michigan
Behavioral Health Management, Inc.                   Michigan
Comprehensive Health Associates                      Puerto Rico
Aurora Behavioral Health Hospital, Inc.              Colorado
Comprehensive Provider Networks of Texas, Inc.       Texas
Comprehensive Innovations Institute                  Texas
Care Institute                                       California
N.P.H.S., Inc.                                       California
CareManor Hospital of Washington, Inc.               Washington
Trinity Oaks Hospital, Inc.                          Texas
Starting Point Incorporated                          California
CareUnit Hospital of Albuquerque, Inc.               New Mexico
CareUnit Clinic of Washington, Inc.                  Washington
CareUnit Hospital of Ohio, Inc.                      Ohio
Comprehensive Care Integration, Inc.                 Delaware
CareUnit of Florida, Inc.                            Florida
Managed Behavioral Healthcare, Inc.                  Florida
AccessCare of Washington, Inc.                       Washington
Comprehensive Orthopedic Care, Inc.                  Florida
</TABLE>




                                       61
-----Original Message----- 

From: KINGVOGT@GMAIL.COM [mailto:KINGVOGT@GMAIL.COM] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 12:07 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

EILEEN King 

10874 GRANDVIEW WAY 

ROYAL PALM BEACH, FL 33411
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-60506

Summary Calendar

 

PATRICIA SMITH,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RANKIN COUNTY, MISS., ET AL.,

Defendants.

SHANNON SMITH,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:99-CV-449

--------------------

February 23, 2001

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Shannon Smith [“Deputy Smith”] appeals the district court’s

denial of his motion for summary judgment based on qualified

immunity in a civil rights lawsuit brought by Patricia Smith

[“Ms. Smith”]. The district court held that Deputy Smith was not

entitled to qualified immunity on Ms. Smith’s claim that the

officer used excessive force on her. We have jurisdiction to

review the district court’s denial to the extent it turned on
No. 00-60506

-2-

matters of law, including whether any issues of disputed fact are

material. Colston v. Barnhart, 146 F.3d 282, 284 (5th Cir.

1998). Our review is de novo. Lemoine v. New Horizons Ranch and

Ctr., Inc., 174 F.3d 629, 634 (5th Cir. 1999).

Deputy Smith argues that he is entitled to qualified

immunity because the force he administered and the injuries

suffered by Ms. Smith were de minimis. Viewing the summaryjudgment evidence in the light most favorable to Ms. Smith, as we

must on this appeal, we reject Deputy Smith’s arguments. See

Ikerd v. Blair, 101 F.3d 430, 434 & n.9 (5th Cir. 1996).

Deputy Smith contends that his actions were reasonable under

the law that was clearly established in April 1998 because no

Fifth Circuit case involved a use of force like the one alleged

by Ms. Smith. When, as here, the legal standard that an officer

must follow was clear, it is not required that the precise action

in question have been held unlawful. See Gutierrez v. City of

San Antonio, 139 F.3d 441, 445 (5th Cir. 1998).

AFFIRMED.
#### § 512.12 What if I am submitting multiple items of information?

Any certificate provided under § 512.4(b) of this part, and any supporting information provided under § 512.4(c) of this part, may be used to support a claim for confidential treatment of more than one item of information. However, general or nonspecific assertions or analysis may be insufficient to form an adequate basis for the agency to find that the information is entitled to confidential treatment, and may result in the denial of the claim.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 9/11/15

Received: September 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8l1p-m2qq

Comments Due: September 24, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule- Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-5156

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Raymond Kominiarek

General Comment

To Whom it may concern (Mr Perez)

Please do not limit my investment choices, such as options trading , in my IRA & 401K 

accounts. In a self -directed account, options trading is an important investment vehicle in order 

to diversify and protect my portfolio. It can reduce my cost basis.

Options trading needs to be allowed for IRA and 401K accounts.
§ 39.9 What may the owner or operator of a foreign-flag vessel do if it believes a provision of a foreign nation's law prohibits compliance with a provision of this part? ( a ) If you are the PVO of a foreign-flag vessel, and you believe that a binding legal requirement of a foreign nation precludes you from complying with a provision of this Part, you may request a waiver of the provision of this Part.
( b ) You must send such a waiver request to the Department.
( c ) Your waiver request must include the following elements: ( 1 ) A copy, in the English language, of the foreign law involved;
( 2 ) A description of how the binding legal requirement of a foreign nation applies and how it precludes compliance with a provision of this Part;
( 3 ) A description of the alternative means you will use, if the waiver is granted, to effectively achieve the objective of the provision of this Part subject to the waiver or, if applicable, a justification of why it would be impossible to achieve this objective in any way.
( d ) If you submit such a waiver request before November 3, 2010 you may continue to apply the foreign legal requirement pending the Department's response to your waiver request.
( e ) The Department shall grant the waiver request if it determines that the binding legal requirement of a foreign nation applies, that it does preclude compliance with a provision of this Part, and that the PVO has provided an effective alternative means of achieving the objective of the provision of this Part subject to the waiver or clear and convincing evidence that it would be impossible to achieve this objective in any way.
1210-AB32-2-1504.html[7/26/2015 6:22:19 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwk-3h2r

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2000

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Matthew DeGumbia

General Comment

I worked hard and I saved all of the money in my IRA, not the government. 

The only thing they did was make it exceedingly difficult for me to save for my retirement.

The data is out there, the 55 to 64 age group has, on average, less than $15,000 saved for retirement.

There are three reasons for this: FEDERAL deficit spending, fractional reserve banking, and Federal Reserve

 money printing!

Clean up this mess, and leave my hard earned funds alone so that I can enjoy MY fruits of my working life.
Editorial Note on Part 451
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 451 appear at 74 FR 49241, Sept. 25, 2009, and at 77 FR 59790, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 451.5 Resubmission or appeal. ( a ) Upon receipt of a denial of approval for certain containers, an owner may correct the noted deficiencies and resubmit the application without prejudice.
( b ) An applicant aggrieved by a decision of an approval authority may obtain review of the decision by the Chief, Office of Operating and Environmental Standards (CG-OES), U.S. Coast Guard. The decision of the Chief, Office of Operating and Environmental Standards (CG-OES), U.S. Coast Guard is a final agency action.
[45 FR 37214, June 2, 1980, as amended at 47 FR 50496, Nov. 8, 1982; 69 FR 58352, Sept. 30, 2004]
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Charles Muniz |                                                                                                                                                                         |
|--------|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:                  | Charles Muniz                                                                                                                                                                |   |
|   | Title:            | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of Tamir Biotechnology, Inc.) |   |
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 240 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 20, 2001.
    Resolved, That the amendment of the Senate to the bill (H.R. 2500) entitled 
``An Act making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and 
State, the Judiciary, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 
30, 2002, and for other purposes'', in the opinion of this House, contravenes 
the first clause of the seventh section of the first article of the Constitution 
of the United States and is an infringement of the privileges of this House and 
that such bill be respectfully returned to the Senate with a message 
communicating this resolution.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 201 0

- NM

- 266

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
#### § 392.52 [Reserved]
-----Original Message-----

From: Roger Kitzmiller [mailto:roger@kitzmiller.us] 

Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 7:23 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Dear Sirs and Madams,

I would like to voice my support for the proposed rule that requires financial advisers to disclose to their 

clients when they receive kickbacks for selling a product. My wife owns a real estate business in North 

Carolina, and she is required to disclose any kickbacks she receives from builders. This disclosure in no 

way increases her cost, nor does it hinder her ability to do business. Instead, it ensures that her clients 

trust they know every aspect of the transactions and can make a more informed decision. 

The proposed standard for fiduciary responsibility for financial advisers is no different. Through my own 

business I have worked with financial services companies for over 20 years and understand the business 

quite well. The claims that this rule interferes with clients’ ability to get advice is sheer nonsense. And 

the ads run on TV completely misrepresent the underlying issues. I am confident that the vast majority 

of Americans will feel better served by their government with this rule in place.

Regards,

Roger Kitzmiller

200 Abbotsbury Court

Waxhaw, NC 28173

_______________________________________

Roger Kitzmiller
From: Tom at AmcInc. [mailto:tlykowskiadvmas@aol.com] 

Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2015 2:13 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN1210-AB32

Mr. Perez,

 I am retired with a nest egg that was once at least more than what it now 

is. 

I blame this on the horrible people (snakes) that advertise themselves as certified financial 

advisors, planners and investment firms. I complained to the publishment and was a 

headline on their publication a few years ago. They also reprimanded me for not doing my due 

diligence in checking these people out better. 

Excuse me, these are companies like , banks with financial departments and others like 

them that saw a person needing help and took total advantage of the situation. They all talked a 

great story, charged their fees and commissions and left me carrying the bag. 

I'm very sick of all of them and have watched my savings dwindle away because of lack of trust. 

My money has been sitting on the sidelines for a number of years now because of the dishonesty 

and lies I experienced.

I would welcome laws and fiduciary duties that would help people like me. 

The way it is right now is nothing more than legal white crime that we can't do anything about. 

Thank you 

Tom Lykowski 

 e-mail:

TLykowskiadvmas@aol.com 

Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S®4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
#### In the Matter of the Church at Harsenville.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBC) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I Todd D. Fanning, Vice-President & Chief Financial
Officer of PNBC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
         financial condition and result of operations of PNBC.
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ __Todd D. Fanning_____________________________________________      Todd D. Fanning
     Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer

November 7, 2003

---
From: Mark Koslow [mailto:mark@mbkoslow.com] 

Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 6:15 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: DOL Fiduciary Rule

This is an extremely bad idea which will not only hurt agents, but will ultimately prove to be 

extremely limiting and counterproductive for potential clients. More restrictive laws will do 

nothing to stop bad behavior! That is a question of conscience and personal integrity! 

I strongly encourage you to maintain the status quo. It's really "not broke", so don't try to fix it! 

--

Mark Koslow

President

Koslow & Associates, Inc.

NC 336-419-2725 

FL 561-373-0287

www.markkoslowandassociates.com