alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 8/19/15 

Received: August 17, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8klv-m1fy

Comments Due: August 28, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule- Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-4949

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Rich Dawson

Address: 

St. Charles, IL,

General Comment

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE pass this rule!!! The majority of consumers have no idea how they 

are being affected by most investment professionals (certainly not all, but most) who do NOT act 

in their clients' best interest but instead act in their own best interest to put their clients in 

investments options that will generate higher fees/commissions for the broker. The fact of the 

matter is that 1% - 2% higher fees over the lifetime of an annuity or a mutual fund that 

"supposedly" generates higher than average returns (which in many studies has been disproved) 

can lead to losses of HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS over the span of the investment for a 

typical client.

If the goal is to truly protect consumers and act in their best interests, and not in lining the 

pockets of financial advisors, investment banks, etc., then this rule NEEDS TO BE PASSED! 

Quit defrauding the average American consumer!!!!
-----Original Message-----

From: Katie Neubauer [mailto:kneubauer1102@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2015 10:13 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Dear Sir or Madame,

I'm emailing to say I support the Department of Labor's Fiduciary Rule. 

Regards,

Katie Neubauer

School Psychologist
```

[109th Congress Public Law 113]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ113.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 2371]]

Public Law 109-113
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To amend part E of title IV of the Social Security Act to provide for 
  the making of foster care maintenance payments to private for-profit 
             agencies. <<NOTE: Nov. 22, 2005 -  [S. 1894]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress <<NOTE: Fair Access Foster Care Act 
of 2005. 42 USC 1305 note.>> assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Access Foster Care Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. FOSTER CARE MAINTENANCE PAYMENTS TO PRIVATE FOR-PROFIT AGENCIES.

    Section 472(b) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 672(b)) is 
amended by striking ``nonprofit'' each place it appears.

    Approved November 22, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 1894:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            Oct. 19, considered and passed Senate.
            Nov. 8, 9, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
From: John O'Reilly [mailto:john@oreillywa.com] 

Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 11:10 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule

Good day,

As the founder of an RIA firm, my greatest concern is any degradation in the fiduciary

responsibility that a Registered Investment Advisor firm is held to.    It would be a travesty to the

American people that a desire to have a unified fiduciary standard REDUCED the only fiduciary

standard in place.  DO NOT DO THAT, PLEASE!

I chose the RIA model for my company because I believe people DESERVE the fiduciary

standard.    In fact, I say make it STRICTER!

I believe that RIAs should not be allowed to accept 12b‐1 fee revenue stream from a mutual

fund.    We are not currently held that that standard now.

I could care less about broker/dealers and wirehouses.   There are foolish consumers (and

always will be) that will buy their financial products and accept their many built‐in conflicts of

interest.    It’s a free world.     

However I would like the broker/dealers and wirehouses to be held to stricter disclosure rules so

that it is OBVIOUS to the consumer who is being paid what by whom.

Thanks for reading,

John

John O’Reilly

O’Reilly Wealth Advisors

A Registered Investment Advisor

Living Values, Achieving Goals

Sign up for our Email Newsletter

john@oreillywa.com

www.oreillywa.com

O: 760‐804‐0910

CA Life Lic #0F41383
#### § 585.68 Petition to extend period to file report.

A manufacturer may petition for extension of time to submit a report under this Part. A petition will be granted only if the petitioner shows good cause for the extension and if the extension is consistent with the public interest. The petition must be received not later than 15 days before expiration of the time stated in § 585.66(a). The filing of a petition does not automatically extend the time for filing a report. The petition must be submitted to: Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590.
# March 27: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL in Syria and Iraq

/ Published March 27, 2015

March 27, 2015

Release # 20150327FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**SOUTHWEST ASIA –** On March 26, Coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria, using attack, fighter and bomber aircraft to conduct six airstrikes. Separately in Iraq, Coalition military forces conducted 10 airstrikes approved by the Iraqi Ministry of Defense, using attack, fighter and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL terrorists. All strikes took place between 8 a.m., March 26, and 8 a.m., March 27, local time.

**Syria**

         Near Kobani, six airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed five ISIL fighting positions, three ISIL vehicles, two ISIL anti-aircraft artillery weapons and an ISIL excavator.

**Iraq**

         Near Bayji, two airstrikes struck two ISIL tactical units and destroyed two ISIL vehicles and an ISIL anti-aircraft artillery weapon.

         Near Fallujah, an airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL anti-aircraft artillery weapon.

         Near Mosul, two airstrikes struck an ISIL staging area and destroyed an ISIL fighting position and an ISIL building.

         Near Sinjar, an airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed five ISIL buildings, an anti-aircraft artillery weapon and an ISIL mortar position.

         Near Tal Afar, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL vehicle.

         Near Tikrit, three airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed two ISIL vehicles and an ISIL VBIED.

Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely.

The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria, the region, and the wider international community. The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Iraq include Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, Netherlands, United Kingdom and U.S. Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Syria include Bahrain, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and U.S.

For additional information contact:

CJTF-OIRmedia@mail.mil

COM: U.S. 1-803-885-8265

COM: Southwest Asia 00-965-2221-6340, then dial 430-6419# or 430-5129#

https://twitter.com/CJTFOIR

https://www.facebook.com/CJTFOIR
# L AW 

# O FFICE OF 

# J OHN 

# M IETUS

, LLC 6701 D EMOCRACY B OULEVARD , S UITE 300 B ETHESDA , MD 20817-7500

J OHN R. M IETUS , J R

. (202) 747- 5212 (240) 396-5362 fax john@mietuslaw.com

March 15, 2013

BY ELECTRONIC MAIL

Ms. Lauralyn Remo Ms. Vanessa Balgobin Air Carrier Fitness Division U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Orange Air, Inc., Dockets OST- 2011 -0073/0074

Dear Ms. Remo and Ms. Balgobin:

Orange Air respectfully requests that the Department again waive condition 9 of the certificate issued to it by Order 2011- 11 -31, condition 10 of the certificate issued by Order 2012 -1- 31
, and 14 C.F.R. 204.7 so as to extend, through July 31, 2013, the time within which Orange Air must commence actual flight operations in order to maintain its interstate and foreign certificate authority. Pursuant to a waiver granted by letter dated November 27, 2012, t he se provisions currently require Orange Air to commence actual flight operations no later than March 31
, 201 3. However, it is now clear that the Federal Aviation Administration and Orange Air will not be able to complete new entrant certification by that date.

The FAA and Orange Air have continued to work diligently to complete the certification process

. With training complete for initial flight crewmember cadres, flight followers, and maintenance personnel, Orange Air will complete Phase 2 of its FAA certification with final manual approval. However, the final Phase 3 relies heavily on the presence of bu sy Flight Standards National Field Office personnel, so proving runs and exercises, for example, may take some time to schedule. (Jeff Hipps and Charley Beers remain the local FAA project and frontline managers, respectively, and can be reached at (407) 8 12

- 303 2 and 812-3020, respectively.) Orange Air remains eager to begin operations once the FAA certification process is complete.
§ 380.713 Instructor requirements. ( a ) Theory training providers must utilize instructors who are theory instructors as defined in § 380.605.
( b ) BTW training providers must utilize instructors who are BTW instructors as defined in § 380.605.
[83 FR 22875, May 17, 2018]
State of New York

Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to 

revision before publication in the New York Reports.

No. 32 SSM 34

The People &c.,

 Respondent,

 v.

Juan Johnson, 

 Appellant.

Submitted by Alice R. B. Cullina, for appellant.

Submitted by Andrew S. Durham, for respondent.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed and case 

remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for further proceedings. Under the 

totality of the circumstances and upon the People's concession that the appeal waiver was 

invalid because the plea court conflated the right to appeal with those rights automatically 

forfeited by a guilty plea, defendant's appeal waiver did not foreclose consideration of his 

suppression claim (see People v Moyett, 7 NY3d 892, 892-893 [2006]).

Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Garcia, Wilson, Singas, Cannataro and Troutman 

concur.

Decided February 10, 2022
§ 510.9 Motions to modify, limit, or quash process. ( a ) ( 1 ) Any person, sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, or other entity served with a subpoena issued under § 510.4 may file with the Deputy Administrator a motion to modify, limit, or quash that subpoena. If there is no Deputy Administrator, or the Deputy Administrator is not available, such motions shall be filed with and decided by the Associate Administrator for Administration. A motion to modify, limit, or quash must be filed not later than 15 days after the service of the process or five days before the return date specified in the process, whichever is earlier, except that, if the process is served within five days of its return date, such motion may be filed at any time before the return date. Any motion must set forth the grounds and theories of why and how the party believes the process should be modified, limited, or quashed and must contain all facts and arguments which support those grounds and theories.
( 2 ) The Deputy Administrator may, upon receiving a motion filed pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) of this section: ( i ) Deny the motion;
( ii ) Modify the return date of the subpoena;
( iii ) Modify, limit or quash the subpoena;
( iv ) Condition granting the motion upon certain requirements; or
( v ) Take any other action he or she believes to be appropriate in the circumstances.
( 3 ) The Office of the Deputy Administrator serves the decision on the motion on the moving party or the counsel or representative of the moving party. This service may be made by personal service, by registered or certified mail, or by reading a copy of the decision to the moving party or the counsel or representative of the moving party.
( 4 ) A denial of any motion properly filed under this section shall be in writing, and shall contain a brief statement of the facts involved and the conclusions drawn from those facts by the Deputy Administrator.
( b ) The Deputy Administrator's decision on the motion to modify, limit, or quash, filed under paragraph (a) of this section is not subject to reconsideration by NHTSA.
#### § 367.30 Fees under the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and Agreement for Registration Year 2023.

Table 1 to [§ 367.30](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-367.30)—Fees Under the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and Agreement for Registration Year 2023

| Bracket | Number of commercial motor vehicles owned or operated by exempt or non-exempt motor carrier, motor private carrier, or freight forwarder | Fee per entity for exempt or non- exempt motor carrier, motor private carrier, or freight forwarder | Fee per entity for broker or leasing company |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| B1 | 0-2 | $41 | $41 |
| B2 | 3-5 | 121 | |
| B3 | 6-20 | 242 | |
| B4 | 21-100 | 844 | |
| B5 | 101-1,000 | 4,024 | |
| B6 | 1,001 and above | 39,289 | |

[[88 FR 40723](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/88-FR-40723), June 22, 2023]
§ 604.13 Registration of private charter operators. ( a ) Private charter operators shall provide the following information at *http://www.fta.dot.gov/laws/leg_reg_179.html* to be considered a registered charter provider: ( 1 ) Company name, address, phone number, e-mail address, and facsimile number;
( 2 ) Federal and, if available, state motor carrier identifying number;
( 3 ) The geographic service areas of public transit agencies, as identified by the transit agency's zip code, in which the private charter operator intends to provide charter service;
( 4 ) The number of buses or vans the private charter operator owns;
( 5 ) A certification that the private charter operator has valid insurance; and
( 6 ) Whether willing to provide free or reduced rate charter services to registered qualified human service organizations.
( b ) A private charter operator that provides valid information in this subpart is a “registered charter provider” for purposes of this part and shall have standing to file a complaint consistent with subpart F.
( c ) A recipient, a registered charter provider, or their duly authorized representative, may challenge a registered charter provider's registration and request removal of the private charter operator from FTA's charter registration Web site by filing a complaint consistent with subpart F.
( d ) FTA may refuse to post a private charter operator's information if the private charter operator fails to provide all of the required information as indicated on the FTA charter registration Web site.
( e ) A registered charter provider shall provide current and accurate information on FTA's charter registration Web site, and shall update that information no less frequently than every two years.
**Exhibit 32**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER OF PALMETTO BANCSHARES, INC.PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 

The undersigned, as the chief executive officer and chief accountingofficer of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc., certify that the Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, which accompanies this certification,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained inthe periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc. at the datesand for the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and no purchaser orseller of securities or any other person shall be entitled to rely upon theforegoing certification for any purpose.  The undersigned expressly disclaimsany obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.

 

 

 

By:

/s/      L. Leon Patterson                           L. Leon Patterson Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Palmetto Bancshares, Inc.

 

/s/      Paul W. Stringer                                Paul W. Stringer Chairman and Chief Executive Officer(Chief Accounting Officer) The Palmetto Bank

 

 

Date:  August 9, 2004
1210-AB32-2-1303.html[7/26/2015 1:18:11 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvv-2hxr

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1798

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Denise Gorman

General Comment

Do NOT mess with my 401-K or my IRA, it is my money I saved and the govt. is NOT entitled to it.
-----Original Message----- 

From: jlandman@sonic.net [mailto:jlandman@sonic.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 3:48 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 27, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Jan Landman 

365 Maple Ave 

Cotati, CA 94931
~ 

L 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Documentation of OMB Review Under Executive Order 12866 

TItlO Of Actlon: Renewable Fuel Standard Program: Standards for 2014, 2015, and 2016 and Biomass-Based Diesel Volume for', 

. ',2017 - Proposed rule . 

DOcket#: EPA HQ OAR 2015 0111 i FRL#: 9927 28 OAR ~ RIN; 2060 AS22 j 

This action was submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review under Executive Order (E.O.) 

12866, titled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Whenever EPA makes publicly available 

a regulatory action that was reviewed under E.O. 12866, section 6(a)(3)(E) of the E.O. directs the Agency to also: 

(1) Make available to the public a copy of the information that was provided to OMB's Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) for review under the E.O., i.e., the text of tYtie draft regulatory action and, if applicable, 

an assessment of the potential costs and benefits, as well as additional information for those actions that are 

determined to be economically significant under the E.O. (Information requirements are described in sections 

6(a)(3)(B) and (C)). 

(2) Identify for the public any substantive changes between the draft submitted to OIRA and the action that was 

subsequently issued, using a method that is complete, clear, and simple. 

(3) Identify for the public those substantive changes made at the suggestion or recommendation of OIRA. 

For this regulatory action, were substantive changes made to information reviewed under E.O. 

12866? [Please check the appropriate answer.] 

El No. [In the docket, include the information identified in item (1) below.] 

El Yes. [In the docket, include the information identified in items (1) —(3) below.] 

Accordingly, the Agency has inc[uded this form and the following information in the public 

docket for this regulatory action: [Please check the appropriate information.] 

p(1) A copy of the information that was provided to OIRA for review under the E.O. 

p(2) Documentation of any substantive changes made to the draft regulatory text that was 

submitted to OIRA when compared with what was subsequently made publicly avai[able. 

The documentation is provided on the pages following this form. Changes made at the 

suggestion or recommendation of OIRA, if any, are c[early identified through attribution to 

OIRA. EPA has used one or more of the following methods to note changes: [select the 

appropriate option(s).] 

p(a) Redline-Strikeout - A copy of the draft regu[atory action submitted, using redlinestrikeout to show the substantive changes that were made. 

p(b) Hand Markup — A copy of the draft regulatory action submitted, using handwritten notes 

to show the substantive changes that were made. 

®(c) Note to the file - A document that identifies the substantive changes that were made, 

with page and paragraph references to the draft regulatory action that was submitted. 

If you have any questions about this regu[atory action or this documentation, p[ease call the 

contact: 

~ Name: oavidKorotney i Email:'koromey.aavia@ePa.gov iPhone:',7s4-z14-4sm I 

Revised 05/05/2010