alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          25,151
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                15,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    101,916
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        197,882
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,803
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 349,476
<DEPOSITS>                                     320,364
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,488
<LONG-TERM>                                      2,350
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,232
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,008
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 349,476
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 15,032
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,558
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,402
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                19,992
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,903
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,102
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           14,890
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      700
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 13,215
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,935
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,935
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,575
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.78
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.11
<LOANS-NON>                                      6,832
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  4,356
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,542
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,766
<RECOVERIES>                                       328
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,803
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,632
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,171
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46952-46953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4113]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Rogue/Umpqua Resource Advisory Committee (RAC)

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA Forest Service Action: Action of Meeting.

SUMMARY: The Rogue/Umpqua Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet 
on Thursday and Friday, September 20 and 21, in Roseburg, Oregon. On 
September 20, the meeting will begin at 10:30 a.m. and conclude at 4:45 
p.m. On September 21, the meeting will begin at 8 a.m. and conclude at 
4 p.m. Agenda items on September 20 include (1) Selection of RAC 
chairperson, (2) approval of 2006 meeting minutes and RAC expenses, (3) 
30-minute public forum at 11 a.m., (4) review of past and proposed 
projects in Klamath County at 11:30 a.m., (5) review of past and 
proposed projects for Lane County at

[[Page 46953]]

1:30 p.m., and (6) update on projects in Jackson and Josephine counties 
at 3:45 p.m. The agenda for September 21 includes (1) 30-minute public 
forum at 8:15 a.m., (2) review of past and proposed projects for 
Douglas County at 8:45 a.m., and (3) review of proposed public projects 
at 10:45 a.m. Written public comments may be submitted prior to the 
September meeting by sending them to Designated Federal Official Cliff 
Dils at the address given below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For more information regarding this 
meeting, contact Designated Federal Official Cliff Dils; Umpqua 
National Forest; 2900 NW. Stewart Parkway, Roseburg, Oregon 97470; 
(541) 957-3203.

    Dated: August 15, 2007.
Cheryl E. Caplan,
Acting Forest Supervisor, Umpqua National Forest.
[FR Doc. 07-4113 Filed 8-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
§ 672.23 Availability of records. ( a ) Except as required by law, or expressly authorized or required by this part, a recipient may not release information pertaining to designated personnel that is required by this part without the written consent of the designated personnel.
( b ) Designated personnel are entitled, upon written request to the recipient, to obtain copies of any records pertaining to his or her training required by this part. The recipient shall promptly provide the records requested by designated personnel and access shall not be contingent upon the recipient's receipt of payment for the production of such records.
( c ) A recipient shall permit access to all facilities utilized and records compiled in accordance with the requirements of this part to the Secretary of Transportation, the Federal Transit Administration, or any State agency with jurisdiction over public transportation safety oversight of the recipient.
( d ) When requested by the National Transportation Safety Board as part of an accident investigation, a recipient shall disclose information related to the training of designated personnel.
#### Otto Stietz N. Y. Glass Letter Company, Respondent, v. Gustav G. Wolfram and others, Appellants.

Order modified as directed in opinion, and affirmed as modified, without costs. Opinion by

Daniels, J.;

order to be settled by Daniels, J.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0507.html[7/20/2015 7:48:21 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-5loi

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0507

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Leigh Reiter

General Comment

I do NOT wish to have government regulators telling me how to spend MY retirement money! I'm smart enough

 to do it myself!
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0550.html[7/20/2015 8:29:12 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-g6qq

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0550

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Do not enact the new regulations.
Exhibit 31-2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) OF THE

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



I,
Matthew F. Hilzinger, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Exelon Corporation; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                                                                
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 18, 2009 |  | /s/    MATTHEW F.
HILZINGER                                                    
|                        |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)



60
###### Editorial Note on Part 571

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 571 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 571.4 Explanation of usage.

The word *any,* used in connection with a range of values or set of items in the requirements, conditions, and procedures of the standards or regulations in this chapter, means generally the totality of the items or values, any one of which may be selected by the Administration for testing, except where clearly specified otherwise.

# Examples:

“The vehicle shall meet the requirements of S4.1 when tested at any point between 18 and 22 inches above the ground.” This means that the vehicle must be capable of meeting the specified requirements at every point between 18 and 22 inches above the ground. The test in question for a given vehicle may call for a single test (a single impact, for example), but the vehicle must meet the requirement at whatever point the Administration selects, within the specified range.

“Each tire shall be capable of meeting the requirements of this standard when mounted on any rim specified by the manufacturer as suitable for use with that tire.” This means that, where the manufacturer specifies more than one rim as suitable for use with a tire, the tire must meet the requirements with whatever rim the Administration selects from the specified group.

“Any one of the items listed below may, at the option of the manufacturer, be substituted for the hardware specified in S4.1.” Here the wording clearly indicates that the selection of items is at the manufacturer's option.

[36 FR 2511, Feb. 5, 1971]
APPENDIX 7

AIR QUALITY TABLES

TABLE A7-1

AIR QUALITY STANDARDS

Pollutant Averaging NAAQS WAAQS 

PSD 

(μg/m3

) 

Time (μg/m3) (μg/m3) 

Class I Class II 

Carbon Monoxide (CO) 

8 hour 10,000 10,000 

1 hour 40,000 40,000 

Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Annual 100 100 2.5 25 

Ozone (O3) 1 hour 235 160 

Particulate Matter (PM10) 

Annual 50 50 4 17 

24 hour 150 150 8 30 

Particulate Matter (TSP) 24 hour 150 

Annual 80 60 2 20 

Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) 24 hour 365 260 5 91 

3 hour 1,300 695 25 512 

TABLE A7-2

PSD INCREMENTS

Pollutant Class I increment 

(μg/m3

) 

Class II increment 

(μg/m3

) 

SO2 

Annual 2 20 

24 hour 5 91 

3 hour 25 512 

PM10 

Annual 4 17 

24 hour 8 30 

NO2 Annual 2 25 

These data are shown graphically in Figure 11 (Comparison of Concentration from JMH to Total 

PSD Increment). 

TABLE A7-3

ESTIMATED WORST-CASE NEAR-FIELD IMPACTS TO CONCENTRATIONS

647 
FROM THE PINEDALE ANTICLINE OIL and GAS PROJECT 

Impacts from the proposed Jack Morrow Hills project are expected to be similar. 

Pollutant Averaging Time 

Concentration 

(% WAAQS) 

Cumulative Monitored 

Background Total 

Pinedale RFD 

SO2 annual 0.00 .02 15 15.02 

SO2 24 hour 0.02 .08 16.5 16.6 

SO2 3 hour 0.01 .06 10.2 10.2 

PM10 annual 0.5 .02 16 16.5 

PM10 24 hour 1.8 .1 12 13.9 

PM2.5 Annual 0.5 .07 33 33.9 

PM2.5 24 hour 1.4 .2 15.4 16.9 

NO2 annual 0.2 .1 9 9.2 

CO 8 hour 0 0 15 15 

CO 1 hour 0 0 8.8 8.8 

Note: Table developed from Pinedale Anticline DEIS Technical Report, Appendix A, 3rd table. 

TABLE A7-4

FAR-FIELD CONCENTRATIONS OF CRITERIA POLLUTANTS

COMPARED TO PSD INCREMENT

Pollutant ug/m3 % PSD 

SO2 Annual 0 0 

SO2 24-Hour 0.04 0.043956 

SO2 3-hour 0.1 0.019531 

PM10 Annual 0.24 1.411765 

PM10 24-Hour 2.74 9.133333 

NO2 Annual 0.16 0.64 

Source: Pinedale Anticline DEIS Technical Report, November 1999. 

648 
TABLE A7-5

WORST-CASE FAR-FIELD IMPACT TO CONCENTRATIONS

FROM PROJECTS INCLUDING JACK MORROW HILLS

Pollutant 

Concentration (% of WAAQS) 

Bridger Fitzpatrick Washakie Grand 

Teton Popo Agie Wind River 

SO2 

annual 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 

24 hour 16.6 16.6 16.6 16.6 16.6 16.6 

3 hour 10.2 10.2 10.2 10.2 10.2 10.2 

PM10 

annual 16.1 16.1 16.0 16.0 16.1 16.1 

24 hour 12.3 12.1 12.0 12.1 12.1 12.1 

PM2.5 

annual 33.5 33.3 33.3 33.3 33.5 33.3 

24 hour 15.7 15.5 15.4 15.5 15.6 15.5 

NO2 annual 9.0 9.1 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 

TABLE A7-6

1995 VISUAL RANGE IN BRIDGER WILDERNESS AREA

Percent of Days Visual Range 

(miles) 

10 127 

20 112 

30 102 

40 94 

50 87 

60 81 

70 74 

80 62 

90 47 

649 
TABLE A7-7

ACIDIFICATION IN FIVE SENSITIVE LAKES

IN THE JACK MORROW HILLS REGION

Lake Wilderness Area Acidification 

(percent LAC) 

Black Joe Bridger 0.7 

Deep Bridger 0.9 

Hobbs Bridger 0.7 

Ross Fitzpatrick 0.4 

Lower Saddlebag Popo Agie 0.7 

650
08/04/2015 15:33 FAA GLRC

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMJNISTRA TION OFFICE OF HEARlNGS

WASHJNGTON, D.C. In the Matter ofNational Power Corporation PAGE 02/03

201 0-GL-70-0212

**Jad~~~n------------------------------------** NOTICE OFAPPEAL Now comesthe Complainantputsuantto 14 C.F.R 

### § l3.233(a) and appeals the lnitial Decision of the Administrative LawJudge 

### inthe above captioned case.

Attomey Federal Aviation Administration Offi.ce ofthe ChiefCounsel, AGC-300 Enforcement Division, Midwest Team. 2300 E. DevonAve. Des Plaines, IL 60018 Phone: 847-294-7862 Fax: 847-294-749808/04/2015 15:33 8472947498 FAA GLRC PAGE 03/03

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE J hereby certify 

### that tbe foregoing Notice of

### Appeal has beenmailedand faxed to 

### the following: And by CERTIFIED MAIL to: Attorney Martin 

### A. 

### Blumenthal One Northfield P __ **I~az=a:,-_s-_u=it~e_::3_::o_::o**

### __________________________ _ ----Grnl*lge,-Ih-&009'_08/04/2015 15:33 8472947498

To: 

### Hearing Docket, AGC-400 Company: Phone: Fax: (202) 

### 493-5020 From: Kate 

### Barber Title: 

### FAA Attorney Date: 

### August 4, 2015 Pages w/cover: FAA GLRC PAGE 01/03 

# IF·ederal Aviation Adm"i,n'istration
Office of the Regional Counsel Greal Lakes Reg'1an 2300 East Devon Des Plaines, ll 60018 Telephone. 847-294-7862 Fsx No. 847-294-8293 E-mail: kate.t>arber@faa.gov 

### Facsimile

****************~*******************************************~~***************************~~~********** 

### Message: Please find attached Complainant's Notice of Appeal in the FAA 

## v. National Power Corporation case. Docket No.: CP10GL0212. Sincerely, Kate Barber
EXHIBIT 10.4

                            STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT

This is an agreement ("Agreement") between George Sines ("Seller") and Stephen
Harrington ("Buyer") made this 28th day of February 2004, subject to the
following terms and conditions hereof.

WHEREAS:

A.    Seller owns 300,000 shares (the "Shares") of The Coffee Exchange, Inc., a
      company incorporated under the laws of the state of Delaware (the
      "Company"); and

B.    Seller wishes to sell the Shares of the Company to the Buyer provided the
      conditions herein below are satisfied.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1.    Purchases and Sale of Shares

      (a)   Seller hereby agrees to sell the Shares to the Buyer for $10,000
            (the "Consideration") and payable in full on the date of this
            Agreement.
      (b)   The closing of the transaction shall occur when this Agreement is
            executed by Seller and the Buyer. On the closing, Buyer shall
            deliver, or cause to be delivered, the Consideration to Seller.
      (c)   Seller shall deliver the Shares to the buyer free and clear of all
            liens, claims or encumbrances.

2.    Representations and Warranties

      (a)   As an inducement for Buyer to enter into this Agreement, Seller
            represents and warrants that:

            (i)   Seller has the lawful power and authority to enter into this
                  Agreement; and
            (ii)  Seller owns the Shares free and clear of all liens, claims or
                  encumbrances.

      (b)   As an inducement for Seller to enter into this Agreement, Buyer
            represents and warrants that Buyer has the lawful power and
            authority to enter into this Agreement.

3.    Binding Effect. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, this
      Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit or the parties
      hereto, their heirs, legal representatives, successors and permitted
      assigns.

4.    Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
      accordance with the laws of the State of California, without giving effect
      to the conflict of laws principles thereof.

5.    Representation by Counsel. Both Buyer and Seller have not been represented
      by counsel.

In witness hereof the parties hereby affix their signatures.

SELLER                                          BUYER

By:   /s/  George Sines                   By:   /s/  Stephen Harrington
      -----------------------                   ----------------------------
      George Sines                              Stephen Harrington
# Death of a Coalition Service Member

/ Published March 21, 2018

March 21, 2018

Release # 20180321-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**SOUTHWEST ASIA –** A service member with Combined Joint Task Force - Operation Inherent Resolve died March 21, 2018 in a non-combat-related incident in Iraq.

The service member’s name and the circumstances surrounding the death will be released at the discretion of the pertinent national authorities.

The incident is under investigation.

-30-
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0701.html[7/21/2015 9:48:45 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-hww3

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0701

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: tom hamilton

General Comment

Please let me decide how my retirement money is handled.
§ 554.10 Initial determinations and public meetings. ( a ) An initial decision of failure to comply with safety standards or of a safety-related defect is made by the Administrator or his delegate based on the completed investigative file compiled by the appropriate office.
( b ) The decision is communicated to the manufacturer in a letter which makes available all information on which the decision is based. The letter advises the manufacturer of his right to present information, views, and arguments to establish that there is no defect or failure to comply or that the alleged defect does not affect motor vehicle safety. The letter also specifies the time and place of a public meeting for the presentation of arguments or sets a date by which written comments must be submitted. Submission of all information, whether at a public meeting or in written form, is normally scheduled about 30 days after the initial decision. The deadline for submission of information can be extended for good cause shown.
( c ) Public notice of an initial decision is made in a Federal Register notice that— ( 1 ) Identifies the motor vehicle or item of equipment and its manufacturer;
( 2 ) Summarizes the information on which the decision is based.
( 3 ) Gives the location of all information available for public examination; and
( 4 ) States the time and place of a public meeting or the deadline for written submission in which the manufacturer and interested persons may present information, views, and arguments respecting the decision.
( d ) A transcript of the public meeting is kept and exhibits may be offered. There is no cross-examination of witnesses.
[45 FR 10797, Feb. 19, 1980, as amended at 60 FR 17267, Apr. 5, 1995]
**Exhibit 24.20**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

**KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS** that I, **Michael Moskow** do hereby appoint Frank M.Clark and Darryl M. Bradford, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2008 of Commonwealth Edison Company, together with any amendments thereto,to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present. 

**Michael Moskow**

**DATE: February 1, 2009**
§ 39.83 What are PVOs' obligations for assisting passengers with a disability in getting on and off a passenger vessel? ( a ) If a passenger with a disability can readily get on or off a passenger vessel without assistance, you are not required to provide such assistance to the passenger. You must not require such a passenger with a disability to accept assistance from you in getting on or off the vessel unless it is provided to all passengers as a matter of course.
( b ) With respect to a passenger with a disability who is not able to get on or off a passenger vessel without assistance, you must promptly provide assistance that ensures that the passenger can get on or off the vessel.
( c ) When you have to provide assistance to a passenger with a disability in getting on or off a passenger vessel, you may use any available means to which the passenger consents (*e.g.,* lifts, ramps, boarding chairs, assistance by vessel personnel).
#### Tanner *v.*O. M. Weber Company, Inc., Appellant

(No. 2).

February 24, 1915:

Opinion by

Trexler, J.,

For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the case of Tanner, Receiver, v. O. M. Weber Company, Inc., ante, p. 14, which involves the same questions, the judgment in this case is affirmed.