alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### King W. Spencer, Respondent, *v.*Binghamton Railway Company, Appellant.

*Spencer*v. *Binghamton Ry. Co.,*136 App. Div. 905, affirmed.

(Argued May 16, 1911;

decided May 30, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 10, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries and for injury to property alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the defendant’s negligence.

*Thomas J. Keenan*for appellant.

*Thomas B. Kattell*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Cray, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 22, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 57136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18064]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Innovation and Technology Ecosystems; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:
    Name and Committee Code: Proposal Review Panel for Innovation and 
Technology Ecosystems (#84685)--University of Louisville Site Visit.
    Date and Time: September 12, 2023; 3:00 p.m.-7:00 p.m.; September 
13, 2023; 8:30 a.m.-7:45 p.m.; September 14, 2023; 8:00 a.m.-2:00 p.m.
    Place: University of Louisville, Ignite Innovation Building, 252 E 
Market St, Louisville, KY 40202.
    Tour Locations: AMIST 334 Eastern Parkway, Vogt Building #104, 
Louisville, KY 40208; and MEMStim 1205 E. Washington Street, 
Louisville, KY 40206.
    Type of Meeting: Part-open.
    Contact Persons: Geoffrey Brown, Program Director, National Science 
Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, Virginia 22314; 
Telephone (703) 292-4979.
    Purpose of Meeting: NSF site visit to provide advice and 
recommendations concerning the progress and future activities of the 
projects that are one year into two-year awards.

Agenda

September 12, 2023

3:00 p.m.-4:15 p.m.--Executive Sessions (Closed)
4:15 p.m.-7:00 p.m.--Tour of AMIST and MEMStim (Open)

September 13, 2023

8:30 a.m.-7:45 p.m.--Executive Sessions (Closed)

September 14, 2023

8:00 a.m.-2:00 p.m.--Executive Sessions (Closed)

    Reason for Closing: Topics to be discussed and evaluated during 
closed portions of the site review will include information of a 
proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; 
and information on personnel. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: August 17, 2023.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023-18064 Filed 8-21-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
§ 372.113 Providers of recreational activities. Transportation by a motor vehicle designed or used to transport not fewer than 9, and not more than 15, passengers (including the driver), whether operated alone or with a trailer attached for the transport of recreational equipment, is exempted from regulation promulgated pursuant to Part B of Title 49 U.S.C. subtitle IV if: ( a ) the motor vehicle is operated by a person that provides recreational activities;
( b ) the transportation is provided within a 150 air-mile radius of the location at which passengers initially boarded the motor vehicle at the outset of the trip; and
( c ) in the case of a motor vehicle transporting passengers over a route between a place in a State and a place in another State, the person operating the motor vehicle is lawfully providing transportation of passengers over the entire route in accordance with applicable State law.
[89 FR 13997, Feb. 26, 2024]
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 340

Recognizing and honoring Jack Shea, Olympic gold medalist in speed skating,

for his many contributions to the Nation and to his community throughout his life.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 29, 2002

Mr. SWEENEY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Recognizing and honoring Jack Shea, Olympic gold medalist

in speed skating, for his many contributions to the Nation and to his community throughout his life.

Whereas John ‘‘Jack’’ Amos Shea was born September 7,

1910, in Lake Placid, New York, a village in the Adirondack Mountains;

Whereas Shea was the son of James Shea, a New York State

Assemblyman, and Grace Shea;

Whereas at the age of 3 Jack began ice skating and by the

age of 10 he was competing in speed skating;

Whereas Shea was the North American speed skating champion in 1929 and 1930;
2

•HRES 340 IH

Whereas at the age of 21 Shea entered the 1932 Winter

Olympics in Lake Placid, New York, during which he

won the gold medal in speed skating for both the 500

meter and the 1,500 meter events;

Whereas Shea was elected to the Speed Skating Hall of

Fame, was among the first group of honorees elected to

the Lake Placid Hall of Fame, and received numerous

other honors from the speed skating community;

Whereas after graduating from Dartmouth College with a degree in political science, Shea served as the town justice

of North Elba, New York, from 1958 to 1974, after

which he became the town supervisor until his retirement

in 1983;

Whereas Shea was a member of the Executive Committee of

the 1980 Lake Placid Olympic Organizing Committee;

Whereas in 1982 Shea was appointed to serve as vice chairman of the Olympic Regional Development Authority;

Whereas Shea was a loving husband to his wife of 67 years,

Elizabeth Steams Shea, and had 4 sons and several

grandchildren and great-grandchildren; and

Whereas Shea’s son Jim competed in the 1964 Winter Olympics in Innsbruck, Austria, and his grandson Jim Jr. will

compete in the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City,

Utah: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) recognizes and honors Jack Shea, Olympic

3 gold medalist in speed skating, for his many con4 tributions to the Nation and to his community

5 throughout his life, and for transcending the sport
3

•HRES 340 IH

1 of speed skating and becoming a symbol of athletic

2 talent and a role model as a loving husband, father,

3 and grandfather; and

4 (2) extends it deepest condolences to the family

5 of Jack Shea and to the Olympic community on

6 their loss.

Æ
1210-AB32-2-1632.html[7/26/2015 9:21:34 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jy0-dqcp

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2129

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Douglas Hensler

General Comment

Outrageous! I hold a PhD in Finance and I assure you I know more about managing my money that the idiots in

 Washington, D.C. Stop this madness.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 331 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      January 23, 2002.
    Resolved, That a committee of two Members be appointed by the Speaker on the 
part of the House of Representatives to join with a committee on the part of the 
Senate to notify the President of the United States that a quorum of each House 
has assembled and Congress is ready to receive any communication that he may be 
pleased to make.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1333.html[7/22/2015 10:36:11 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvh-81tc

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1333

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I WILL PLAN FOR MY OWN RETIREMENT. DO NOT TAKE OVER MY RETIREMENT MONIES!!!!
#### §§ 392.20-392.21 [Reserved]
From: William Grove [mailto:wmrgrove@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2015 12:07 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

I have become aware that the U.S. Department of Labor (Department) has issued a proposed rule

that would take away the current ability of self-directed individual investors to use listed options 

in their IRA accounts?

Buying and selling asset covered options is a key investment strategy and should remain 

available to IRA individual account holders! PLEASE DO NOT CHANGE / REMOVE THIS 

KEY INVESTMENT TOOL FROM IRA'S!

Thanks, Bill Grove ( Retired Veteran, Kingsland TX. )
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-60019

Summary Calendar

ASAD MUSHTAQ

Petitioner

v.

MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A43 968 082

Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Asad Mushtaq, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions for review ofthe

order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal from the

Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his application for a waiver of inadmissibility

pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1182(k). He argues that the BIA erred in holding that his

father’s knowledge of Mushtaq’s inadmissibility at the time that Mushtaq

entered the United States as a minor is imputed to Mushtaq, thereby

disqualifying him from relief under § 1182(k). He also argues that the IJ erred

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 15, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-60019

2

in denying relief under § 1182(k) as a matter of discretion. In dismissing

Mushtaq’s appeal, the BIA found only that the imputation of Mushtaq’s father’s

knowledge to Mushtaq was proper for purposes of § 1182(k), and it did not

address the IJ’s alternative, discretion-based denial.

Because this court generally reviews only the BIA’s decision, the issue

whether the IJ erred in denying relief as a matter of discretion is not properly

before us. See Mikhael v. INS, 115 F.3d 299, 302 (5th Cir. 1997). However, even

if Mushtaq were to show that the BIA erred in imputing his father’s knowledge

to him, remand to the BIA for a determination of the propriety of the IJ’s

discretion-based denial would be necessary before this case could be decided. See

Nakimbugwe v. Gonzales, 475 F.3d 281, 284-85 (5th Cir. 2007). Further, the

Government is correct that if the BIA were to affirm the IJ’s discretion-based

denial, this court would lack jurisdiction to review that denial pursuant to

8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii). See Ayanbando v. Chertoff, 517 F.3d 273, 276-77

(5th Cir. 2008) (holding that this court lacks jurisdiction to review denials when

the applicable statute specifies, as does § 1182(k), that relief is discretionary).

Accordingly, before this court reaches the complex question whether Mushtaq’s

father’s knowledge was properly imputed to Mushtaq, judicial economy dictates

that we REMAND this case to the BIA for the limited purpose of determining

whether the IJ erred in denying relief under § 1182(k) as a matter of discretion.

REMANDED
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Alfacell  Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended April 30, 2006 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Kuslima Shogen,
Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chairman of the Board of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: June 9, 2006

                                       /s/ Kuslima Shogen
                                       ------------------
                                       Name:  Kuslima Shogen
                                       Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                              (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Alfacell  Corporation  and will be retained by Alfacell  Corporation
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the 19th meeting of the American Health Information Community Electronic Health Records Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.)

# DATES:

October 23, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. [Eastern].

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 4090. Please bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​healthrecords/​*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Workgroup will continue its discussion on ways to achieve widespread adoption of certified EHRs, minimizing gaps in adoption among providers.

                    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional information, go to:                           ( print page 52380)    *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​healthrecords/​ehr_​instruct.html*.                

Dated: September 7, 2007.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 07-4506 Filed 9-12-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
#### In the Matter of the Petition of Joshua L. Wadly, Respondent, for leave to issue execution against the property of Joseph Davis and others, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Follett, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30,
1998 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,383
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      708
<ALLOWANCES>                                       150
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,092
<PP&E>                                           3,061
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,611
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,339
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,922
<OTHER-SE>                                     (40,909)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,611
<SALES>                                            225
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   593
<CGS>                                               70
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,716
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  15
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,563)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,563)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,563)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
From: Financial Engines 

To: Department of Labor, EBSA 

Subject: Request to testify at hearing on definition of Fiduciary 

Financial Engines respectfully requests to testify at the hearing on March 1 on the 

definition of a fiduciary. 

Financial Engines is the largest independent Registered Investment Advisor (RIA) in 

America. Financial Engines assumes fiduciary responsibility as an advisor to plan 

sponsors. We work with over 400 large employers to provide professional management 

services to 463,000 401(k) plan participants nationwide. Our 14+ years of experience 

providing advisory services to participants, coupled with our independent research, have 

given us insight into the importance of fiduciary protections in the provision of advisory 

services and discretionary investment management. 

We plan to address the following during our testimony: 

• When should investment education be exempted from fiduciary requirements 

• The importance of having the exemption for seller-purchaser transactions be 

applicable only to plan sponsors and not plan participants 

• Why it’s not too costly or impossible to be a fiduciary to large numbers of 

participants 

We thank you for your consideration. 

Sincerely, 

Anne Tuttle 

General Counsel 

1804 Embarcadero Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94303 

Phone: 650-565-7769 

Fax: 650-565-4905 

atuttle@financialengines.com 

Financial Engines is a leading independent investment advisor committed to providing 

everyone the trusted retirement help they deserve. The company helps investors with 

their total retirement picture by offering personalized retirement plans for saving, 

investing and retirement income. Financial Engines offers online advice and 

professional management to meet the needs of different investors. Co-founded in 1996 

by Nobel Prize-winning economist Bill Sharpe, Financial Engines works with America’s 

leading employers and retirement plan providers to make retirement help available to 

millions of American workers. For more information, please visit 

www.financialengines.com.
From: Todd Myers [mailto:toddloebmyers@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 7:43 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

Please remove your hands from my pockets. Please do spend your time usefully and go 

and deconstruct some of our larger banks. Or maybe establish some true consumer 

protection (not run by the Fed). Or maybe dismantle an NRSRO. Or maybe have the 

SEC actually try and do its job once, even when handed its homework on a platter. 

Either way, your incompetence no longer amazes me. I might as well be talking to my 

local county clerk. Oh wait. 

Market participants can deal with overvaluation. They can deal with undervaluation. 

They can even deal with volatility. We can deal with sensible, well thought out 

regulation that fosters fairness and transparency. What we cannot deal with is ham 

handed political activity in the markets. The ban on short sales is another the perfect 

example of this. This amendment is right up there with privatizing social security - no 

one needs your "enhancement". 

Furthermore, are you prepared to shoulder fixed long-term liabilities? Or will you 

inflation and market adjust them so that ALL risk will shouldered by our citizens with 

only limited rewards? What will happen with our contributions at the outset? Will they 

be put into a trust fund for your colleagues and their patrons in lower Manhattan to loot? 

Who will determine the inputs into your distribution system? DC has clearly done a bang 

up job at the PBGC. Perhaps you are willing to take on these liabilities because you have 

no intention of making good on them. You are not a trustworthy counter-party. Why 

else do you think you can't fund your debt at the back end of the curve? 

What happened to the American ethos that I was brought up with? Was it a fiction? Last 

one out please turn out the lights. 

-- 

Todd Myers