alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of State by the laws of the United States, including 5 U.S.C. 301, 2104, 2105 and 3101, I hereby appoint Joshua L. Dorosin as an Officer of the United States.

Pursuant to 1 U.S.C. 112b, and section 1 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act (22 U.S.C. 2651a), I hereby designate Joshua L. Dorosin as the Chief International Agreements Officer of the Department of State, with the title of International Agreements Compliance Officer.

                    This document will be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: August 10, 2023.

Antony J. Blinken,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2023-18098 Filed 8-22-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
#### James G. Ross, *Respondent, v.*Rinaldo H. Stilwell, Appellant.—

Motion denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-23-0000679

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

STATE OF HAWAI I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PAUL H. STERN, Defendant-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT

NORTH AND SOUTH KONA DIVISION (CASE NO. 3DCW-23-0001204)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Leonard, Acting Chief Judge, Hiraoka and Guidry, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that: (1) The statement of jurisdiction and opening brief were due on or before January 18, 2024, and February 20, 2024, respectively;

(2) Self-represented Defendant-Appellant Paul H. Stern (Stern) failed to file either document, or request an extension of time; (3) On March 4, 2024, the appellate clerk entered a default notice informing Stern that the time for filing the statement of jurisdiction and opening brief had expired, the matter would be called to the court's attention on March 14, 2024, for appropriate action, which could include dismissal of Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-23-0000679 11-APR-2024 08:02 AM Dkt. 18 ODSDNOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

the appeal, under Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rules 12.1(e) and 30, and Stern could request relief from default by motion; and

(4) Stern has not taken any further action in this appeal. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, April 11, 2024. /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Acting Chief Judge /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge /s/ Kimberly T. Guidry Associate Judge

2
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0894.html[7/21/2015 5:51:13 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-as5o

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0894

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Dan Skattum

General Comment

please don't mess with my retirement.

thank you
EXHIBIT
21






Certain
Subsidiaries of PNM Resources, Inc.






As of
December 31, 2007, PNM Resources, Inc. directly or indirectly owns all of the
voting securities of the following "significant subsidiaries" (as defined in
Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X):




Public
Service Company of New Mexico, a New Mexico corporation that does business under
the names “Public Service Company of New Mexico” and “PNM”.




Texas-New
Mexico Power Company, a Texas corporation that does business under the name
Texas-New Mexico Power Company.




First
Choice Power Special Purpose, LP, a Texas limited partnership that does business
under its partnership name.




First
Choice Power, LP, a Texas limited partnership that does business under its
partnership name.




FCP
Enterprises Inc., a Delaware corporation that does business under its corporate
name.




TNP
Enterprises, Inc., a Texas corporation that does business under its corporate
name.





The
remaining subsidiaries of PNM Resources, Inc. considered in the aggregate as a
single subsidiary, do not constitute a "significant subsidiary" as of the end of
the year covered by this report.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001

21–284 PDF 2005

[ERRATA]

ROUNDTABLE ON REGULATORY ISSUES

ROUNDTABLE

BEFORE THE

SUBCOMMITTEE ON REGULATORY REFORM AND 

OVERSIGHT

OF THE

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS 

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS

FIRST SESSION

WASHINGTON, DC, MARCH 17, 2005

Serial No. 109–7

Printed for the use of the Committee on Small Business

(

Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/house

ERRATA 

The referenced hearing held before the House Committee on 

Small Business was inadvertently printed with the wrong serial 

number 108-7. The correct serial number is 109-7.
ISIL Chemical Weapons Expert Killed in Coalition Airstrike
 By U.S. Central Command News Release
  January 30, 2015 Release # 20150103FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **TAMPA, Fla. -** ISIL terrorist Abu Malik was killed Jan. 24 in a coalition airstrike in the vicinity of Mosul, Iraq. Malik was an ISIL chemical weapons engineer who worked at Saddam Hussein's Muthana chemical weapon production facility before affiliating with al Qaeda Iraq in 2005. He later joined ISIL and his past training and experience provided the terrorist group with expertise topursue a chemical weapons capability. His death is expected to temporarily degrade and disrupt the terrorist network and diminish ISIL's ability to potentially produce and use chemical weapons against innocent people. Coalition airstrikes continue to target ISIL terrorists, using manned and unmanned aircraft to conduct airstrikes in Iraq and Syria. This airstrike was conducted in support of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to degrade and defeat the terrorist group ISIL and the threat they pose to the region and the wider international community.
#### § 570.60 Steering system.

(a) *System play.* Lash or free play in the steering system shall not exceed the values shown in Table 2.

(1) *Inspection procedure.* With the engine on and the steering axle wheels in the straight ahead position, turn the steering wheel in one direction until there is a perceptible movement of the wheel. If a point on the steering wheel rim moves more than the value shown in Table 1 before perceptible return movement of the wheel under observation, there is excessive lash or free play in the steering system.

| Steering wheel diameter (inches) | Lash (inches) |
| --- | --- |
| 16 or less | 2 |
| 18 | 21/4 |
| 20 | 21/2 |
| 22 | 23/4 |

Table 2. Steering Wheel Free Play Values

(b) *Linkage play.* Free play in the steering linkage shall not exceed the values shown in Table 3.

(1) *Inspection procedure.* Elevate the front end of the vehicle to load the ball joints, if the vehicle is so equipped. Insure that wheel bearings are correctly adjusted. Grasp the front and rear of a tire and attempt to turn the tire and wheel assemble left and right. If the free movement at the front or rear tread of the tire exceeds the applicable value shown in Table 3, there is excessive steering linkage play.

| Nominal bead diameter or rim size (inches) | Play (inches) |
| --- | --- |
| 16 or less | 1/4 |
| 16.01 through 18.00 | 3/8 |
| 18.01 or more | 1/2 |

Table 3. Front Wheel Steering Linkage Free Play

(c) *Free turning.* Steering wheels shall turn freely through the limit of travel in both directions.

(1) *Inspection procedure.* With the engine running on a vehicle with power steering, or the steerable wheels elevated on a vehicle without power steering, turn the steering wheel through the limit of travel in both directions. Feel for binding or jamming in the steering gear mechanism.

(d) *Alignment.* Toe-in or toe-out condition shall not be greater than 1.5 times the values listed in the vehicle manufacturer's service specification for alignment setting.

(1) *Inspection procedure.* Drive the vehicle over a sideslip indicator or measure with a tread gauge, and verify that the toe-in or toe-out is not greater than 1.5 times the values listed in the vehicle manufacturer's service specification.

(e) *Power steering system.* The power steering system shall not have cracked, frayed or slipping belts, chafed or abrated hoses, show signs of leakage or have insufficient fluid in the reservoir.

(1) *Inspection procedure.* Examine fluid reservoir, hoses and pump belts for the conditions indicated.

Note:

Inspection of the suspension system must not precede the service brake performance test.
§ 392.62 Safe operation, buses. No person shall drive a bus and a motor carrier shall not require or permit a person to drive a bus unless— ( a ) All standees on the bus are rearward of the standee line or other means prescribed in § 393.90 of this subchapter;
( b ) All aisle seats in the bus conform to the requirements of § 393.91 of this subchapter; and
( c ) Baggage or freight on the bus is stowed and secured in a manner which assures— ( 1 ) Unrestricted freedom of movement to the driver and his proper operation of the bus;
( 2 ) Unobstructed access to all exits by any occupant of the bus; and
( 3 ) Protection of occupants of the bus against injury resulting from the falling or displacement of articles transported in the bus.
[63 FR 33278, June 18, 1998]
From: Barry Pressman [mailto:tamalemolly@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 5:33 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

I am now years old and have personally been ripped off by stock brokers several times. These 

included several big name and other supposedly honest brokers. I no longer am in the market. I 

have advised my son to stay away.

It is way overdue to force these scum to act as fiduciaries. I applaud your efforts to c!eanup Wall 

Street.

Barry Pressman

39831 Grove Hts

Lady Lake, FL 32159
#### Elsie Lambert, Respondent, v. Archibald Hoyt and another, Appellants.

Judgmentof County Court reversed and. that of justice affirmed. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>






<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             792
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,557
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,174
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,461
<PP&E>                                           9,585
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,130
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  69,973
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,543
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,846
<COMMON>                                         1,795
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,769
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    69,973
<SALES>                                         15,364
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,364
<CGS>                                           14,282
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,427
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   725
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 120
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    937
<INCOME-TAX>                                       342
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                481
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       437
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
<FN>
<F1>Earnings per share have been restated to comply with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 128. The quarters ending September 30
and June 30, 1997 and fiscal years 1997 and 1996 have been restated for the
effects of SFAS No. 128. EPS-PRIMARY reflects EPS-BASIC for all periods
presented.
</FN>
        
 

</TABLE>
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1347.html[7/23/2015 6:10:01 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvi-ijuj

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1347

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Andrea Humphries

General Comment

I am smart enough to plan for my own retirement. Stay the hell out of our lives!!!!!!!!
From: nicaestarico@yahoo.com [mailto:nicaestarico@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:17 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 26, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Roberto Aburto 

7908 Rancho Fanita Drive, Spc # 25 

Santee, CA 92071
NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal

revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108

- 1750; (617) 557

- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us

SJC

- 11889

KERR CARRINGTON vs . COMMO NWEALTH.

December 11 , 2015.

Supreme Judicial Court , Superintendence of inferior courts.

Kerr Carrington appeals from a judgment of a single justice of this court denying his petition for relief under G. L.

c. 211, § 3. Carrington was convicted in 2 010 of several criminal offenses. His convictions were affirmed by the Appeals Court, and we denied further appellate review. Commonwealth v. Carrington , 84 Mass. App. Ct. 1101, S

. C ., 466 Mass. 1103 (2013).
In his G. L. c. 211, § 3, petition, Carrington challenged various asserted errors in the criminal proceedings. The single justice denied relief without a hearing. We affirm.

Carrington has filed a memorandum and appendix pursuant to S.J.C. Rule 2:21, as amended, 434 Mass. 1301 (2001)
, which requir es a petitioner seeking relief from an interlocutory ruling of the trial court to "set forth the reasons why review of the trial court decision cannot adequately be obtained on appeal from any final adverse judgment in the trial court or by
other available means." That rule does not apply here, as the charges against Carrington have gone to final judgment

. Nonetheless, it is clear that Carrington had, and exercised, an adequate opportunity to obtain review in the ordinary appellate process. Moreover, he remains free to file a motion for a new trial pursuant to Mass. R. Crim. P. 30, as appearing in 435 Mass. 1501 (2001) , and to appeal from any adverse ruling

thereon. " The court's extraordinary power of general superintendence under c. 211, § 3, is ' exerci sed sparingly, not as a substitute for the normal appellate process or merely to provide an additional layer of appellate review after the normal2

process has run its course. '" Doyle v. Commonwealth , 472 Mass. 1002, 1003 (2015), quoting Norris v. Commonwealth , 447 Mass. 1007, 1008 (2006)

.

Judgment affirmed

.

The case was submitted on briefs

. James P. McKenna for the p etitioner

.
Coös,

Dec., 1899.

#### Young *v.*Benton, *Ex’r, & a.*

A clause in a will charging “the estate inherited from my late husband with a life annuity” is sufficient to create a priority in favor of the annuitant, in the absence of evidence from which a contrary intent may fairly be inferred.

Bill in Equity, for the construction of the will of Louise Low Benton. Facts agreed.

*Bingham, Mitchell ft Batchellor,*for the plaintiff.

*Breiv, Jordan ft Bucldey,*and *Merrill Bhurtleff,*for the defendants.

Peaslee, J.

By the sixth clause o'f her will, Mrs. Benton provides as follows : “ I charge the estate inherited from my late husband with a life annuity of two hundred and fifty dollars to our friend, Mary Le W. Young.” Taken by itself, this clause appears to express an intent that the annuity should be a charge upon all the property which the testatrix had received from her husband’s estate. Are the surrounding facts such as to show that tins was not her purpose ? The circumstances that she gave a large number of legacies, that she manifestly desired that “ Benton Manor ” should remain in the Benton name, and that she made no other provision for priorities, but, on the contrary, disposed of the residue of her personal property that might remain after the satisfaction of all other bequests, are evidence that she had confidence the estate would be sufficient to pay all legacies. As she thought the estate was ample, it is claimed that she could not have contemplated a deficiency, or intended to create priorities. The fatal weakness of the argument is that it omits any consideration of the language used in the clause giving the annuity. The phrase, “ I charge the estate,” whether construed by strict rules of law or according to common understanding, is expressive of an intent to create a priority. It can have no other meaning.

Taking the mil as a whole, it appears that the testatrix thought that the estate would be sufficient to pay all legacies in full; but if it was not sufficient, she intended that tins annuitant should not lose any part of the sum that was to be paid to her each year. The mil bears evidence of having been drawn by one skilled in such work. Real estate is limited to the eldest surviving son of the executor, and beyond that a wish is expressed as to the dispo*269sition of it by the devisees. Personal property is disposed of by a letter of instructions, referred to in and made a part of the will. In many other particulars the will shows that it was drawn with care, and with a full understanding of the meaning of the language used. There is no evidence to justify a conclusion that the testatrix did not mean what she said, or that the various parts of the will are necessarily conflicting. In accordance with the expressed intention of the testatrix, the annuity is a charge upon all the estate which she received from her husband, and takes precedence over all other bequests.

*Case discharged.*

All concurred.
# National Preparedness Month, 2007

National Preparedness Month is an opportunity to raise awareness about the importance of emergency preparedness and to encourage all Americans to better prepare their homes and communities for emergencies.

Protecting America's homeland and citizens is the shared responsibility of the entire Nation. Individuals can prepare themselves and their families for emergencies by taking simple steps such as organizing an emergency supply kit, making a personal preparedness plan, becoming informed about different threats, and getting involved in preparing their community. These activities create a culture of preparedness and can help save lives. 

My Administration continues to improve our Nation's ability to prepare for emergencies. The Department of Homeland Security is working with other Federal, State, and local government organizations, as well as the private sector, to prevent, respond to, and recover from all types of emergencies. Together, Americans can significantly enhance the level of national preparedness to further safeguard our communities and secure our homeland. 

This month is also an opportunity to pay tribute to America's first responders who put themselves at risk for the safety of their fellow citizens. These brave police officers, firefighters, and emergency service personnel exemplify the compassion and commitment that help strengthen our country. We will be forever grateful for their service and sacrifice. 

During National Preparedness Month, I encourage all Americans to get involved in their community's preparedness efforts. Citizens may visit ready.gov and citizencorps.gov to learn more about emergency preparedness and ways to take action. 

                        NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim September 2007 as National Preparedness Month. I call upon the people of the United States to recognize the importance of preparing for potential emergencies and to observe this month by participating in appropriate events, activities, and preparedness programs.                               ( print page 51156)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirtieth day of August, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 07-4371

Billing code 3195-01-P