alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: GLM1234@aol.com [mailto:GLM1234@aol.com] 

Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2015 2:58 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: DOL Fiduciary Rule comment

Sirs,

I have been a licensed insurance agent for nearly 40 years. I have established a reputation for doing the 

best planning for my clients by following both California and Federal rules. Adding new regulations will not 

make me a better agent or adding more regulations will not guarantee my clients will get better 

information. There are over 5000 insurance companies in the marketplace. I already do my best when 

finding and providing information and to suggest a plan to benefit my clients. At what point will new 

regulations drive me out of business because I did not analyze all 5000 companies to make sure I my 

client is getting the best service available. I already do that within reason. 

Please do not make helping my clients much more difficult that it already is. This new Fiduciary Rule is 

not necessary and will not increase the service and benefits my clients now receive.

Glenn Mitchell

Calif. License 0511522 (Issued Jan 1976)
#### § 601.2 Organization of the administration.

(a) The headquarters organization of FTA is comprised of eight principal offices which function under the overall direction of the Federal Transit Administrator (“the Administrator”) and Deputy Administrator. These offices are:

(1) Office of Administration.

(2) Office of Budget and Policy.

(3) Office of Chief Counsel.

(4) Office of Civil Rights.

(5) Office of Communications and Congressional Affairs.

(6) Office of Planning and Environment.

(7) Office of Program Management.

(8) Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation.

(b) FTA has ten regional offices, each of which function under the overall direction of the Administrator and Deputy Administrator, and under the general direction of a Regional Administrator. In addition, FTA has established a Lower Manhattan Recovery Office, which is under the general direction of the Director for this office.

| Region/States | Office/address | Telephone No. |
| --- | --- | --- |
| I. Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont | FTA Regional Administrator, Kendall Square, 55 Broadway, Suite 920, Cambridge, MA 02142-1093 | (617) 494-2055 |
| II. New York, New Jersey, and U.S. Virgin Islands | FTA Regional Administrator, One Bowling Green, Room 429, New York, NY 10014-1415 | (212) 668-2170 |
| III. Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia | FTA Regional Administrator, 1760 Market Street, Suite 500, Philadelphia, PA 19103-4124 | (215) 656-7100 |
| IV. Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, and Tennessee | FTA Regional Administrator, Atlanta Federal Center, Suite 17T50, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, GA 30303 | (404) 562-3500 |
| V. Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin | FTA Regional Administrator, 200 West Adams Street, Suite 320, Chicago, IL 60606 | (312) 353-2789 |
| VI. Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas | FTA Regional Administrator, 819 Taylor Street, Room 8A36, Fort Worth, TX 76102 | (817) 978-0550 |
| VII. Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska | FTA Regional Administrator, 901 Locust Street, Suite 404, Kansas City, MO 64106 | (816) 329-3920 |
| VIII. Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming | FTA Regional Administrator, Dept. of Transportation, FTA, 12300 W. Dakota Ave., Suite 310, Lakewood, CO 80228-2583 | (720) 963-3300 |
| IX. Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, Guam, American Samoa, and Northern Mariana Islands | FTA Regional Administrator, 201 Mission Street, Suite 310, San Francisco, CA 94105 | (415) 744-3133 |
| X. Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington | FTA Regional Administrator, Jackson Federal Building, 915 Second Avenue, Suite 3142, Seattle, WA 98174-1002 | (206) 220-7954 |
| Lower Manhattan Recovery Office | FTA LMRO Director, One Bowling Green, Room 436, New York, NY 10004 | (212) 668-1770 |
#### § 553.39 Effect of petition for reconsideration on time for seeking judicial review.

The filing of a timely petition for reconsideration of any rule issued under this part postpones the expiration of the statutory period in which to seek judicial review of that rule only as to the petitioner, and not as to other interested persons. For the petitioner, the period for seeking judicial review will commence at the time the agency takes final action upon the petition for reconsideration.

[60 FR 63651, Dec. 12, 1995]
EXHIBIT
32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Coastal Caribbean Oils & Minerals,
Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Phillip W. Ware, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                        
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with
  the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
  1934; and                              
| |     |                                                                                                                                                        
| | (2) | The information contained in
  the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
  and result of operations of the Company.

|                   |  |                         | 
|------------------ |  | ----------------------- | 
|Date: June 2, 2005 |  | By /s/ Phillip W. Ware 
|                   |  |                         | 
|                   |  | Phillip W. Ware        
|                   |  | President and Treasurer

---
§ 6.17 Contents of application. ( a ) An application for an award of fees and expenses under the Act shall identify the applicant and the proceeding for which an award is sought. The application shall show that the applicant has prevailed and identify the position of an agency or agencies in the proceeding that the applicant alleges was not substantially justified. Unless the applicant is an individual, the application shall also state that it did not have more than 500 employees at the time the proceeding was initiated, giving the number of employees of the applicant and describing briefly the type and purpose of its organization or business.
( b ) The application shall also include a statement that the applicant's net worth does not exceed $1 million (if an individual) or $5 million (for all other applicants, including their affiliates). However, an applicant may omit this statement if: ( 1 ) It attaches a copy of a ruling by the Internal Revenue Service that it qualifies as an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)) or, in the case of a tax-exempt organization not required to obtain a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service on its exempt status, a statement that describes the basis for the applicant's belief that it qualifies under such section; or
( 2 ) It states that it is a cooperative association as defined in section 15(a) of the Agricultural Marketing Act (12 U.S.C. 114j(a)).
( c ) The application shall state the amount of fees and expenses for which an award is sought.
( d ) The application may also include any other matters that the applicant wishes this agency to consider in determining whether and in what amount an award should be made.
( e ) The application shall be signed by the applicant or an authorized officer or attorney of the applicant. It shall also contain or be accompanied by a written verification under oath or under penalty of perjury that the information provided in the application is true and correct.
( f ) If the applicant is a partnership, corporation, association, or organization, or a sole owner of an unincorporated business, the application shall state that it did not have more than 500 employees at the time the proceeding was initiated, giving the number of its employees and describing briefly the type and purpose of its organization or business.
From: D J [mailto:djyamaki@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 10:03 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

We have been saving for retirement, since we were eligible to do so, maxing out our 

contributions annually. We have very definite plans for these extensive savings, and 

now that we are in our 50's you want to change the rules on us? 

No one is more motivated to make my money last than I, and since I actually made 

money over and above my 2008 highs, while broker after broker cries over the state 

of their affairs, it's quite possible that I am best able to direct my own funds. It is a 

risk that I signed up for when I contributed to my retirement funds, and one that I 

am more than willing to continue to assume. If you want to make it optional for 

individuals to donate their retirement funds to annuity fees, that is one thing, but do 

not make it mandatory. The whole point of these IRAs and 401Ks were to provide 

an incentive for the individual to assume some responsibility to save for retirement. 

There is no dearth of people they can pay to advise them on how to best use their 

savings towards securing a financially secure retirement, if they do not feel capable 

of getting on the internet and learning what to do for themselves. 

What the rules are going forward will dictate whether or not we continue to 

contribute to our retirement accounts, or save money in non-tax sheltered accounts 

that we continue to control. Do not penalize our forethought in saving by forcing 

changes on us that we never bought into. We would highly prefer that you also not 

penalize our 15 year old, who will be opening a Roth this year with last year's 

income. If you force that money into annuities, the funds will go into a self-directed 

brokerage instead. 

Social Security is supposed to be the safety net, into which we have been forced to 

pay. These are my funds...don't tell me what to do with them. Educate people if 

you will, but treat them like the adults they are and don't play Nanny Sam. 

Sincerely, 

Julie Yamaki
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 160 (Monday, August 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 56844]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18009]



[[Page 56844]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of 
Authority

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice 
entitled ``Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of 
Authority'' that appeared in the Federal Register of August 14, 2023. 
The document announced amendments to the organization structure for 
FDA, Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), Office of 
Strategic Partnerships and Technology Innovation (OST). Although HHS 
approved these amendments on June 27, 2023, the Notice inadvertently 
omitted to include the following language: ``FDA will not implement the 
new organizational structure until after the necessary requirements are 
completed.'' This document corrects that error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denise Huttenlocker, Associate 
Director for Management, Office of Management, Center for Devices and 
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Bldg. 66, 10903 New 
Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993, 240-743- 1760.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of August 14, 2023 
(88 FR 55053), in FR Doc. 2023-17379, the following corrections are 
made:
    1. On page 55053, in the second column, in the Dates section, after 
the first sentence, add ``FDA will not implement the new organizational 
structure until after the necessary requirements are completed.''
    2. On page 55053, in the third column, in section III., remove the 
first sentence and add in its place, ``After completion of the 
necessary requirements for implementation, this reorganization will be 
reflected in FDA's Staff Manual Guide (SMG).''

    Dated: August 17, 2023.
Elizabeth J. Gramling,
Executive Secretary to the Department, Department of Health and Human 
Services.
[FR Doc. 2023-18009 Filed 8-17-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
From: Big Bad Bob [mailto:bobinator50000@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 6:51 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33; Feedback.

" 

13. Should some form of lifetime income distribution option be required for defined 

contribution plans (in addition to money purchase pension plans)? If so, should that 

option be the default distribution option, and should it apply to the entire account 

balance? To what extent would such a requirement encourage or discourage plan 

sponsorship?" 

The GAO published GAO-09-405SP titled "The Nation’s Long-Term Fiscal Outlook 

March 2009 Update"; in that report they showed, if the economy were to recover, they 

would need to increase taxes at a rate of .5% of GDP year over year to cover Social 

security, Medicare, Medicade, and other social welfare programs. Those programs are 

doomed no matter how much capital is flung at them. Either we crash and destroy the 

economy by 2020 to maintain them, or Sacrifice the whole thing by 2070. Only by 

reducing costs through common sense healthcare legislation and standardizing the 

medical industry can such a plan become tenable and that is impossible for the 

foreseeable future due to lobbying groups. 

This concept of taking 401k, buying bonds or government backed securities with it, then 

backing the bonds with taxes to put it bluntly, detached from any concept of reality or 

sound finance. In 2008 the federal government attempted to socialize 401K and Social 

security retirement plans by making them available for general investment into the stock 

market; this failed spectacularly and was never considered again. 

After the failure in response of Katrina, the market bust and wholesale looting to which 

the public treasury by banks, the printing of federal reserve notes to purchase bonds, the 

failure of the worlds most powerful army to capture Osama bin laden the amercian public 

is dissatisfied with the performance of their government. any plan to increase spending, 

taxes or entitlements will be opposed with increasing fervor. The likely reaction to even 
the proposal of such a plan, much less the actual execution of such would be the 

immediate with-drawl of funds from public 401K and IRA plans by the majority of 

constituents. 

Failure to allow those funds to be withdrawn will result in violence. If you take the 

ability of the elderly away to eat or get their medication you put them on the edge; they 

will come armed. 

In short, this will not work. 

I am spending most of my money on an education in IT right now with plans on moving 

to a more free, prosperous society such as Beijing, Taiwan, The Netherlands, Finland, 

Canada, Sweden, or even South America. I am planning this specifically because I do 

not believe I can be all I want to be in this country. I do not wish to work or live in the 

USA within the next decade and I was born and raised in this country. 

Thanks! 

Robert Forth 

208 N knollwood, Wheaton Illinois, 60187
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC.

|                                          |  |                              
|----------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Subsidiaries                              |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|                                          |  |                              
|                                          |  |                              
|Suttle
 Apparatus Corporation             |  | Illinois                     
|Suttle Costa Rica, S.A.                   |  | Costa Rica                   
|Tel Products, Inc.                        |  | Minnesota                    
|Suttle
 Caribe, Inc.                      |  | Minnesota                    
|Austin
 Taylor Communications, Ltd.       |  | United Kingdom               
|Automatic
 Tool & Connector Company, Inc. |  | New Jersey                   
|JDL
 Technologies, Inc.                   |  | Minnesota                    
|Transition
 Networks, Inc.                |  | Minnesota                    
|Transition
 Networks Shanghai.            |  | China                        
|LANart
 Corporation                       |  | Massachusetts                
|MiLAN
 Technology Corporation             |  | California                   
|Image
 Systems Corporation                |  | Minnesota                    

All such
subsidiaries are 100%-owned directly by Communications Systems, Inc. The
financial statements of all such subsidiaries are included in the consolidated
financial statements of Communications Systems, Inc.

55

---
1210-AB32-2-1400.html[7/26/2015 3:48:37 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jw3-cpv6

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1896

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Paul Bell

General Comment

I have worked extremely hard, lived frugally and saved diligently. 

I'm emphatically opposed to the government making any changes that might effect my 401k savings. 

I intend to fund my retirement and deeply regret hearing that there are discussions and considerations to change

 the rules.

I will be paying taxes on those funds of course when I begin to withdraw those funds.

NO RULE. CHANGES!!!
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 17, 1995 (129), Para 129.9 Migrant Worker Protection]
[Pages 1529-1530]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.129.9  migrant worker protection

  Mr. GOODLING moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 1715) 
respecting the relationship between workers' compensation benefits and 
benefits available under the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker 
Protection Act; as amended.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. RIGGS, recognized Mr. CLINGER and Mr. 
OWENS, each for 20 minutes.
  After debate,
  The question being put, viva voce,

[[Page 1530]]

  Will the House suspend the rules and pass said bill, as amended?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. RIGGS, announced that two-thirds of the 
Members present had voted in the affirmative.
  So, two-thirds of the Members present having voted in favor thereof, 
the rules were suspended and said bill, as amended, was passed.
  A motion to reconsider the vote whereby the rules were suspended and 
said bill, as amended, was passed was, by unanimous consent, laid on the 
table.
  Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said 
bill.
```
EXHIBIT
32.2























Certification
of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350


(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, of Britton & Koontz
Capital Corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), I, William M. Salters,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:







(1)
            the
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.




















Date: May
7,
2009                                                                /s/ William M. Salters


William M. Salters


Chief Financial
Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 61472]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-25534]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7634]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition

    Determinations: ``The Game of Kings: Medieval Ivory Chessmen From 
the Isle of Lewis''
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``The Game of Kings: Medieval Ivory Chessmen 
from the Isle of Lewis,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition 
within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or 
custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, 
from on or about November 14, 2011, until on or about April 22, 2012, 
and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, 
is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

     Dated: September 27, 2011.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-25534 Filed 10-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
1210-AB32-2-1602.html[7/26/2015 8:56:09 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jxx-qt9t

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2099

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: mark calkins

General Comment

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eehKMp_0fBo