alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1210-AB32-2-1458.html[7/26/2015 5:23:27 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwf-jvwq

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1954

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Guy Loeffler

Address:

1121 Bexley Hills Bend

Apex, NC, 27502

Email: guy.loeffler@gmx.com

General Comment

Leave our 401K alone ... this is the only way Americans can safely build wealth and NOT rely upon the

 government to provide for them. DO NOT enact restrictions on how 401K funds can be used, before OR after

 retirement age. PERIOD.

We need to encourage EVERY person in the United States to put as much as possible into 401K plans and other

 forms of savings/investment and relieve the burden of individual retirement responsibility from the Government.
§ 37.127 Complementary paratransit service for visitors. ( a ) Each public entity required to provide complementary paratransit service under § 37.121 of this part shall make the service available to visitors as provided in this section.
( b ) For purposes of this section, a visitor is an individual with disabilities who does not reside in the jurisdiction(s) served by the public entity or other entities with which the public entity provides coordinated complementary paratransit service within a region.
( c ) Each public entity shall treat as eligible for its complementary paratransit service all visitors who present documentation that they are ADA paratransit eligible, under the criteria of § 37.125 of this part, in the jurisdiction in which they reside.
( d ) With respect to visitors with disabilities who do not present such documentation, the public entity may require the documentation of the individual's place of residence and, if the individual's disability is not apparent, of his or her disability. The entity shall provide paratransit service to individuals with disabilities who qualify as visitors under paragraph (b) of this section. The entity shall accept a certification by such individuals that they are unable to use fixed route transit.
( e ) A public entity shall make the service to a visitor required by this section available for any combination of 21 days during any 365-day period beginning with the visitor's first use of the service during such 365-day period. In no case shall the public entity require a visitor to apply for or receive eligibility certification from the public entity before receiving the service required by this section.
[56 FR 45621, Sept. 6, 1991, as amended at 61 FR 25416, May 21, 1996]
From : Sharon Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Sent : 05/30/2012 11:03 AM

To : "Higgins, Cortney" < Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov >

Cc : Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject : Fw: demo analysis

Hello Cortney

- This is the demo analysis done for the 2010 rule, that was referred to in the

reconsideration.

Sharon V. Nizich

Minerals and Manufacturing Group (MMG)

Sector Policies and Programs Division

OAQPS

- US EPA

RTP NC 27711

919/541

- 2825

(See attached file: 305_Cement_Ej memo to docket_7.10.pdf)
#### In the Matter of the New York Insurance Company.

Account of John Berry for services allowed at $250.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

 

I, David D. Hillard, Chief Financial Officer of Fisher Communications, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fisher Communications, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: September 12, 2003 

 

/s/ David D. Hillard

David D. Hillard 

Senior Vice President 

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 21.1

As of December 31, 2009, the Company had the following active subsidiaries:



| |  |                                                                      |  |                       
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
| |  | Wholly-owned subsidiaries of Comprehensive Care Corporation:         |  | State of Incorporation
| |  |                                                                     
| |  | Comprehensive Behavioral Care, Inc.                                  |  | Nevada                
| |  | Core Corporate Consulting Group, Inc.                                |  | Delaware              
| |  | Direct Ventures International, Inc.                                  |  | Florida               
| |  | Global Techgroup, Inc.                                               |  | Nevada                
| |  |                                                                     
| |  | Wholly-owned subsidiaries of Comprehensive Behavioral Care, Inc.:    |  |                       
| |  |                                                                     
| |  | Comprehensive Care Integration, Inc.                                 |  | Delaware              
| |  | Comprehensive Behavioral Care of Connecticut, Inc.                   |  | Florida               
| |  | Healthcare Management Services, Inc.                                 |  | Michigan              
| |  | CompCare of Pennsylvania, Inc.                                       |  | Nevada                
| |  | CompCare IPA, Inc.                                                   |  | New York              
| |  |                                                                     
| |  | Affiliates sponsored by Comprehensive Behavioral Care, Inc.:         |  |                       
| |  |                                                                     
| |  | Comprehensive Provider Networks of Texas, Inc.                       |  | Texas                 
| |  |                                                                     
| |  | Majority-owned subsidiaries of Comprehensive Behavioral Care, Inc.   |  |                       
| |  |                                                                     
| |  | CompCare de Puerto Rico, Inc.                                        |  | Puerto Rico           
| |  |                                                                     
| |  | Minority-owned subsidiaries of Core Corporate Consulting Group, Inc. |  |                       
| |  |                                                                     
| |  | Core Select Benefit, LLC                                             |  | Virgina               



85
Exhibit 21.4

Peco Energy Company Subsidiary Listing



|                              |  |                          
|----------------------------- |  | -------------------------
|Affiliate                     |  | Jurisdiction of Formation
|Adwin Realty Company          |  | Pennsylvania             
|ATNP Finance Company          |  | Delaware                 
|ExTel Corporation, LLC        |  | Delaware                 
|OldPecoGasCo, Company         |  | Pennsylvania             
|PEC Financial Services, LLC   |  | Pennsylvania             
|PECO Energy Capital Corp.     |  | Delaware                 
|PECO Energy Capital Trust III |  | Delaware                 
|PECO Energy Capital Trust IV  |  | Delaware                 
|PECO Energy Capital Trust V   |  | Delaware                 
|PECO Energy Capital Trust VI  |  | Delaware                 
|PECO Energy Capital, LP       |  | Delaware                 
|PECO Energy Transition Trust  |  | Delaware                 
|PECO Wireless, LP             |  | Delaware
#### § 236.16 Electric lock, main track releasing circuit.

When an electric lock releasing circuit is provided on the main track to permit a train or an engine to diverge from the main track without time delay, the circuit shall be of such length to permit occupancy of the circuit to be seen by a crew member stationed at the switch. When the releasing circuit extends into the fouling circuit, a train or engine on the siding shall be prevented from occupying the releasing circuit by a derail either pipe-connected to switch point or equipped with an independently operated electric lock.

[49 FR 3383, Jan. 26, 1984]
IV

House Calendar No. 122

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 343

[Report No. 107–357]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3394) to authorize funding

for computer and network security research and development and research fellowship programs, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 5, 2002

Mr. DIAZ-BALART, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3394) to authorize funding for computer and network security research

and development and research fellowship programs, and

for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of

3 rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 3394) to authorize funding for com-
2

HRES 343 RH

1 puter and network security research and development and

2 research fellowship programs, and for other purposes. The

3 first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. Points of

4 order against consideration of the bill for failure to comply

5 with clause 4(a) of rule XIII are waived. General debate

6 shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour

7 equally divided and controlled by the chairman and rank8 ing minority member of the Committee on Science. After

9 general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment

10 under the five-minute rule. Each section of the bill shall

11 be considered as read. During consideration of the bill for

12 amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole

13 may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether

14 the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be

15 printed in the portion of the Congressional Record des16 ignated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amend17 ments so printed shall be considered as read. At the con18 clusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the

19 Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with

20 such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous

21 question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

22 amendments thereto to final passage without intervening

23 motion except one motion to recommit with or without in24 structions.

House Calendar No. 122

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 343

[Report No. 107–357]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3394)

to authorize funding for computer and networksecurity research and development and researchfellowship programs, and for other purposes.

FEBRUARY 5, 2002

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
Senior Officer Agreement
 

                                                                                        June 15, 2000
**PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL**
Mr. Manjit S. Cheema
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24

- 6343

JAMES ANTHONY BARNETT, JR., a/k/a “ Lady Ja ” Barnett

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

,

v.

MR. MOURING

,

Defendant

– Appellee

.

No. 24

- 6395

JAMES ANTHONY BARNETT, JR., a/k/a “ Lady Ja ” Barnett

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

,

v.

MR. MOURING

,

Defendant

– Appellee.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 5:22

- ct

- 03200

- D )

Submitted : June 25 , 2024 Decided: June 28, 2024 USCA4 Appeal: 24-6343 Doc: 14 Filed: 06/28/2024 Pg: 1 of 32 Before RICHARDSON and QUATTLEBAUM

, Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER , Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

James Anthony Barnett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6343 Doc: 14 Filed: 06/28/2024 Pg: 2 of 33 PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, James Anthony Barnett, Jr., seeks to appeal the

district court ’s orders denying Barnett’s motion to reconsider the order denying a

settlement conference and denying Barnett’s motion for recusal. This court may exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan

Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The order s Barnett seeks to appeal are neither final

order s nor appealable interlocutory or collateral order s . Accordingly, we dismiss the se

appeal s for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 24-6343 Doc: 14 Filed: 06/28/2024 Pg: 3 of 3
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105-2498

 

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Heavy-Duty Hybrid Onboard Diagnostics

FROM: Amy Kopin

TO: The Docket

DATE: July 15, 2011

On June 22nd, 2011 we held a conference call with Azure to discuss concerns raised by

hybrid manufacturers regarding heavy-duty onboard diagnostic (OBD) requirements and timing. 

Concerns were raised during the comment period for the heavy-duty greenhouse gas notice of 

proposed rulemaking that heavy-duty hybrid applications may not be able to meet the 2013 

heavy-duty OBD regulations that were published in the 2009 OBD Final Rulemaking.

1,2

 

Attendees from this meeting are shown in the table below.

Attendee Affiliation 

Cleophas Jackson EPA – Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division 

Anthony Neam EPA – Assessment and Standards Division 

Amy Kopin EPA – Assessment and Standards Division 

Jim Mancuso Azure

Jonathan Jacoby Azure

Mike Kiers Azure

 

1 U.S. EPA, NHTSA, and DOT, “Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Mediumand Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles,” republished December 29, 2010. Available here: 

http://origin.www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-12-29/html/2010-32726.htm

2 U.S. EPA, “Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicles Engines; Final Rule 

Regulations Requiring Onboard Diagnostic Systems on 2010 and Later Heavy-Duty Engines Used in Highway 

Applications Over 14,000 Pounds; Revisions to Onboard Diagnostic Requirements for Diesel Highway Heavy-Duty 

Vehicles Under 14,000 Pounds,” published February 24, 2009. Available here: 

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/im/obd/regtech/hd-obd-frm-02-24-09-notice-74-fr-8310.pdf

OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION
April 23, 1997

VIA TELECOPY

Deer Oaks Limited Partnership
c/o The Balcor Company
2355 Waukegan Road
Suite A-200
Bannockburn, Illinois  60015
Attn.:  Ilona Adams

     Re:  Deer Oaks Apartments, San Antonio, Texas

Gentlemen:

     Reference is made to that certain Agreement of Sale dated as of March 24,
1997 by and between Sentinel Acquisitions Corp., as Purchaser, and Deer Oaks
Limited Partnership, as Seller (the "Contract").  Accompanying this letter
please find my client's Notice of Disapproval, as such term is defined in
paragraph 17 (c) of the Contract.  In addition, by copy of this letter (with
accompanying document and evidence of Seller notification), I am providing to
the Escrow Agent the Due Diligence Termination Notice in accordance with
paragraph 2 of that certain Escrow Agreement dated March 31, 1997.

                              Sincerely,

                               /s/ Shane O'Neill
                              -------------------------------
                              Shane O'Neill

cc:  
The Balcor Company
2355 Waukegan Road
Suite A-200
Bannockburn, Illinois  60015
Attn.:  James Mendelson

Daniel J. Perlman
Katten Muchin & Zavis
Suite 1600
525 West Monroe Street
Chicago, Illinois  60661

Earl B. Slavitt, Esq.
Katten Muchin & Zavis
1999 Avenue of the Starts
Suite 1400
Los Angeles, California  90067

Alamo Title Company
112 E. Pecan Street, Suite 125
San Antonio, Texas  78205
Attention:  Ronald J. Bates
<PAGE>
NOTICE OF TERMINATION OR SELLER'S DEFAULT

STATE OF NEW YORK             )
                              )  ss.:
COUNTY OF NEW YORK            )

     The undersigned, having been first duly sworn, does hereby affirm, depose
and state that Sentinel Acquisitions Corp., as Purchaser under that certain
Agreement dated March 14, 1997, providing for the sale of property located in
San Antonio, Texas and known as the Deer Oaks Apartments has terminated the
Agreement pursuant to Paragraph 17 thereof.

     The undersigned demands return of all earnest money deposited under the
Agreement pursuant to his right therein.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Affidavit on this
22nd day of April, 1997.

                              SENTINEL ACQUISITION CORP., 
                              a Delaware corporation

                              By:  /s /  Anita Breslin
                                      ----------------------------
                                       Anita Breslin - Vice- President

Subscribed and sworn to before
me, a Notary Public in and for
said County and State.

/s/ Kathleen J. Cawley
-------------------------------
Notary Public 
<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52088-52089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4499]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Sunshine Act Meeting; Defense Task Force on Sexual Assault in the 
Military Services; Correction

AGENCY: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and 
Readiness); DoD.

ACTION: Notice of committee meeting; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (5 
U.S.C., Appendix, as amended), the Sunshine in the Government Act of 
1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended), and 41 CFR 102-3.150, The Defense 
Task Force on Sexual Assault in the Military Services published a 
document in the

[[Page 52089]]

Federal Register of August 14, 2007 concerning the Place of Meeting, 
Date, Time and Purpose of the Meeting. Due to scheduling changes beyond 
the control of the Task Force the schedule for the Task Force's 
September 19, 2007 administrative working meeting must be changed. 
Since these changes were subsequent to the Task Force publishing its 
meeting notice in the Federal Register, the Committee Management 
Officer for the Department of Defense, pursuant to 41 CFR 102-3.150(b), 
waives the 15-calendar day notification requirement.
    The purpose for the administrative working meeting remains 
unchanged and, pursuant to 41 CFR 102-3.160(b), the meeting is closed 
to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LT Shaka Thorne, (703) 325-6640.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of August 14, 2007 in FR Doc. 07-3988, on 
page 45422, in the first column, correct the ``Place of Meeting'' 
caption to read:
    Place of Meeting:

7:30 a.m. to 9 a.m.--Pentagon Conference Center, room B2, Pentagon, 
Washington, DC 20301;
9 a.m. to 9:30 a.m.--Room 3E788, Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301; and
9:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.--Crystal Gateway One, 1235 South Clark Street, 
Washington Headquarters Services (WHS) Conference Room, Suite 940, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202.

    Name of Committee: Defense Task Force on Sexual Assault in the 
Military Services (hereafter referred to as the Task Force)

    Dated: September 7, 2007.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 07-4499 Filed 9-10-07; 1:09 pm]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1505.html[7/23/2015 12:25:45 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-zv9l

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1505

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Im smart enough to plan for my own retirement. Please leave my planning alone!!!