alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1210-AB32-2-1272.html[7/24/2015 10:07:06 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvu-de92

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1767

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Kevin W.

General Comment

I have been putting into my retirement accounts given a certain understanding between myself and the

 government. It is wrong to change that "contract" after it has began. It is impossible for a person to plan for the

 retirement they want when the government keeps changing the "rules".

It is bad enough that the government steals 12% of my income to parcel it back as they see fit. Leave me and the

 rest of my money alone.
Editorial Note on Part 381
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 381 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 381.305 How do I determine when I may apply for an exemption? ( a ) You may apply for an exemption if one or more FMCSR prevents you from implementing more efficient or effective operations that would maintain a level of safety equivalent to, or greater than, the level achieved without the exemption.
( b ) Before you decide to apply for an exemption you should carefully review the regulation to determine whether there are any practical alternatives already available that would allow you to conduct your motor carrier operations. You should also determine whether you need an exemption from all of the requirements in one or more parts of the regulations, or whether a more limited exemption from certain sections within one or more parts of the regulations would provide an acceptable level of regulatory relief. For example, if you need regulatory relief from one of the recordkeeping requirements concerning driver qualifications, you should not request regulatory relief from all of the requirements of part 391.
#### The Duplex Safety Boiler Company, *Appellcunt, v.*C. Henry Garden and others, *Respondents.*

Order setting aside verdict and judgment thereon reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide 'the event. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

Pratt, J., not sitting.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1035.html[7/22/2015 6:56:08 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-nyxr

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1035

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Do not mess with my retirement plan. I am perfectly capable of managing it myself.
1210-AB32-2-1254.html[7/24/2015 9:42:43 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvt-pdsy

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1749

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

It has come to my attention that the DOL is considering regulating how retirement accounts are used by the

 owner. I have taken great care to plan for my retirement and do not need or want the government deciding any

 decisions for me. I am smart enough to make my own decisions.

Thank you.
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 23-2-2

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report in this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001,
into Commonwealth Edison Company's (the Company) previously filed prospectuses
as follows: (1) prospectus dated August 21, 1986, constituting part of Form S-3
Registration Statement File No. 33-6879, as amended (relating to the Company's
Debt Securities and Common Stock); (2) prospectus dated January 6, 1997,
constituting part of Form S-3 Registration Statement File No. 33-51379 (relating
to the Company's Debt Securities and Cumulative Preference Stock); (3) Form S-8
Registration Statement File No. 333-33847 (relating to the Commonwealth Edison
Company Excess Benefit Savings Plan).


Arthur Andersen LLP

Chicago, Illinois
April 1, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 160 (Monday, August 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56909-56910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-17937]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #18073 and #18074; MONTANA Disaster Number MT-
00170]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of MONTANA

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Montana (FEMA-
4726-DR), dated 08/12/2023.
    Incident: Flooding.
    Incident Period: 04/10/2023 through 04/26/2023.

DATES: Issued on 08/12/2023.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/11/2023.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/13/2024.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 08/12/2023, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Blaine, Daniels, Hill, Park, Roosevelt, Sheridan, 
Valley and the Fort Peck Tribes.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.375
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.375

[[Page 56910]]

 
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.375
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 18073 6 
and for economic injury is 18074 0.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco S[aacute]nchez, Jr.,
Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2023-17937 Filed 8-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 158

Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 7, 2001

Mr. FOLEY submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating majority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following named Members be and

2 are hereby, elected to the following standing committees

3 of the House of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM: Mr. Dun5 can.

6 COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE: Mr. Gilchrest.

7 COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Mr. Shuster.
2

HRES 158 ATH

1 COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRA2 STRUCTURE: Mr. Ney to rank after Mr. Baker, Mr.

3 Culberson, and Mr. Shuster.

Æ
§ 523.6 Heavy-duty vehicle. ( a ) A heavy-duty vehicle is any commercial medium- or heavy-duty on-highway vehicle or a work truck, as defined in 49 U.S.C. 32901(a)(7) and (19). For the purpose of this section, heavy-duty vehicles are divided into four regulatory categories as follows: ( 1 ) Heavy-duty pickup trucks and vans;
( 2 ) Heavy-duty vocational vehicles;
( 3 ) Truck tractors with a GVWR above 26,000 pounds; and
( 4 ) Heavy-duty trailers.
( b ) The heavy-duty vehicle classification does not include vehicles excluded as specified in 49 CFR 535.3.
[81 FR 74237, Oct. 25, 2016, as amended at 89 FR 52945, June 24, 2024]
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT AB ELAR DO ADRIANO C ANGC O, Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 13-71945 Age n c y No. A041-163-014 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

June 14, 2016 ** B e fore : B EA, WATFORD, a nd FR IEDLAND, C irc uit Judge s. Abe la rdo Adria no C angc o, a

native and c i tiz e n

of the Philippine s, pe titions for re vie w of the B o a

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism issing his a ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s (“ IJ” ) disc re tiona ry de nia l of a

wa ive r of fra

ud or m isre pre se ntation unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1227(a )(1)(H). Our jurisdic tion is governe d 

# FIL ED JUN 21 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).by

8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w de novo que s tions of la w, a nd we re vie w for substa ntia l e vide nc e the a ge nc y ’ s fa c tua l findings. Zhi v . Holde r , 751 F.3d 1088, 1091 (9th C ir. 2014). W e de ny in pa rt a nd dismiss in pa

rt the pe tition for re vie w. The B IA did not e nga ge in im pe rm issiblefa c t-finding or e rr in a gre e ing with the IJ tha t C angc o is re m ova

ble a s c ha rge d in the Notic e to Appe a r (“N TA” ) a s a

n a lie n, who by

fra ud or willful m

isre pre se ntation, proc ure d a visa or a dm ission into the U nite d State s, whe re substa ntia l e vide nc e supports the IJ’ s findings tha

t C angc o ha d e nga ge d in fra u d in obta ining his la

wful pe rm ane n t re side nt sta tus a nd the IJ orde re d C angc o re m ove d on the c ha rge s c onta ine d in the NTA. Se e 8 U.S.C . § 1182(a )(6)(C )(i). To the e x te nt the IJ m ay have e rre d in a ddre ssing re m ova bility only in the orde r and not in the de c ision, C a

n g c o fa ile d to de m o nstra

te any pre j udic e re sulting from

suc h e rror. Se e K

umar v . Gonzale

s , 439 F.3d 520, 523-24 (9th C ir. 2006). The a ge n c y

wa s not re quire d to de te rm ine whe t he r C a n gc o wa s sta

tutorily e ligiblefor a

wa ive r unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1227(a )(1)(H), whe re it de te rm ine d tha t it would de ny

suc h a n a pplic a tion in the

e xe rc ise of disc re tion. Se e Sime onov v . Ashc roft , 371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th C ir. 2004) (c o urts a re not re quire d to m ake findings on non-dispositive issue s).

1 3 - 7 1 9 4 5

2W e la c k jurisdic tion to re vie w the a ge nc y ’ s disc re t iona ry de nia l of a

wa ive r unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1227(a )(1)(H), and C angc o doe s not ra ise a c olora b le que stion of la w or due proc e ss c la im

tha t would invoke

our jurisdic tion. Se e 8 U.S.C . § 1252(a )(2)(B ), (D); San Pe dro v . Ashc roft , 395 F.3d 1156, 1157-58 (9th C ir. 2005). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D in par t; DISM ISSE D in par t.

1 3 - 7 1 9 4 5 3
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8
No. 333-136744, No. 333-127778, No. 333-108561, No. 333-44437 and No. 333-15929) of our report dated August 8, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Comprehensive Care Corporation and subsidiaries included in this
Transition Report (Form 10-K) for the period of June 1, 2006 thru December 31, 2006.



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|                                      
|/s/ Kirkland, Russ, Murphy & Tapp P.A.
|Kirkland, Russ, Murphy & Tapp P.A.    
|                                      
|Clearwater, Florida                   
|August 8, 2007
#### Simeon T. Benjamin, *as Trustee, etc.,*and others, *Appellants, v.*The National Ulster County Bank, *Respondent.*

—; Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.
§ 382.501 Removal from safety-sensitive function. ( a ) Except as provided in subpart F of this part, no driver shall perform safety-sensitive functions, including driving a commercial motor vehicle, if the driver has engaged in conduct prohibited by subpart B of this part or an alcohol or controlled substances rule of another DOT agency.
( b ) No employer shall permit any driver to perform safety-sensitive functions; including driving a commercial motor vehicle, if the employer has determined that the driver has violated this section.
( c ) For purposes of this subpart, commercial motor vehicle means a commercial motor vehicle in commerce as defined in § 382.107, and a commercial motor vehicle in interstate commerce as defined in part 390 of this subchapter.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00265-CR

DARYN WAYNE DARLAND APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 97TH DISTRICT COURT OF MONTAGUE COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Daryn Wayne Darland attempts to appeal from the trial court’s 

May 2012 judgment convicting him of possessing less than one gram of a 

“Penalty Group 1” controlled substance in a drug-free zone.2 The judgment 

reflects that appellant committed the offense in January 2011 and, pursuant to a 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.115(a), (b) (West 2010), 

§ 481.134(d) (West Supp. 2012).
2

plea bargain, received five years’ confinement as his punishment. In a “Guilty 

Plea Memorandum” that appellant signed in conjunction with his plea, he 

received admonishments, waived constitutional and statutory rights, judicially 

confessed, and waived any right to appeal. The trial judge, appellant, and 

appellant’s counsel all signed a certification of appellant’s right of appeal that 

stated that appellant had entered into a plea bargain and had “NO right of 

appeal.”

Nonetheless, in June 2012, appellant filed a notice of appeal. Later in 

June, we sent a letter to appellant to inform him that we could dismiss his appeal 

unless we received a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We 

have not received a response. Therefore, in accordance with the trial court’s 

certification, we dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d) (“The appeal 

must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of 

appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.”), 43.2(f); 

Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: August 23, 2012
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1203.html[7/22/2015 3:43:49 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvd-pv6i

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1203

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: James Herket

General Comment

I can plan my own retirement. The money " I SAVED" is my money not the governments!!!!
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

GAREY R. NEHRKE and MARGARET NEHRKE,

Appellants,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK and

LEISUREVILLE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Appellees.

No. 4D18-2368

[May 9, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Barry J. Stone, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. 

CACE14006978.

Garey Nehrke, Pompano Beach, pro se.

Tricia J. Duthiers of Liebler Gonzalez & Portuondo, Miami, for appellee 

Wells Fargo.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### John Hurd, *Respondent, v.*The Hannibal and St. Joseph Railroad Company, *Appellant.*

— Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 207 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 25, 2001.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, elected to the 
following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Armed Services: Mr. Larsen of Washington.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### § 37.209 Training and other requirements.

OTRB operators shall comply with the requirements of §§ 37.161, 37.165-37.167, and 37.173. For purposes of § 37.173, “training to proficiency” is deemed to include, as appropriate to the duties of particular employees, training in proper operation and maintenance of accessibility features and equipment, boarding assistance, securement of mobility aids, sensitive and appropriate interaction with passengers with disabilities, handling and storage of mobility devices, and familiarity with the requirements of this subpart. OTRB operators shall provide refresher training to personnel as needed to maintain proficiency.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 247

Honoring Cal Ripken, Jr., for an outstanding career, congratulating him

on his retirement, and thanking him for his contributions to baseball,

to the State of Maryland, and to the Nation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 2, 2001

Mr. EHRLICH (for himself, Mrs. MORELLA, Mr. HOYER, Mr. CARDIN, Mr.

GILCHREST, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. WYNN, Mr. CUMMINGS,

Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. COBLE, Mr. LARGENT, Mr. WATTS of Oklahoma,

Ms. PELOSI, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virgina, Mr. ARMEY,

and Mr. DELAY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Government Reform

OCTOBER 2, 2001

Committee on Government Reform discharged; considered under suspension of

the rules and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Honoring Cal Ripken, Jr., for an outstanding career, congratulating him on his retirement, and thanking him

for his contributions to baseball, to the State of Maryland, and to the Nation.

Whereas Cal Ripken, Jr., played in 2,632 consecutive Major

League Baseball games and holds the all-time record for

consecutive games played by a Major League player,

shattering Lou Gehrig’s record of 2,130;
2

•HRES 247 ATH

Whereas Ripken has over 3,000 career hits and ranks 14th

on the all-time hit list;

Whereas Ripken is 1 of only 7 players to have 400 home runs

and 3,000 hits in a career;

Whereas Ripken was an All-Star 19 times in his Major

League career, twice winning Most Valuable Player of the

All-Star Game;

Whereas Ripken was named to Major League Baseball’s AllCentury Team;

Whereas Ripken has won 2 Golden Gloves and 2 Most Valuable Player awards;

Whereas Ripken played all 21 of his Major League seasons

with the Baltimore Orioles, choosing to stay with his

team in an era dominated by free agency;

Whereas at one point during his career with the Orioles,

Ripken’s brother Bill Ripken was also playing for the

team, and his father, Cal Ripken, Sr., was managing;

Whereas Ripken has been a model citizen for Harford County, Maryland, and the Baltimore City metropolitan area

while contributing millions of dollars and countless hours

to community projects;

Whereas Ripken and his wife Kelly have led their community

in projects ranging from battling illiteracy to helping

inner-city youth through various foundations, including

the Kelly and Cal Ripken, Jr., Foundation, the Baltimore

Reads Ripken Learning Center, and the Reading, Runs,

and Ripken program; and

Whereas Ripken has pledged $9,000,000 for the construction

of a baseball facility in Harford County, Maryland, which
3

•HRES 247 ATH

includes 6 baseball fields, recreational facilities, and dormitories: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors

2 Cal Ripken, Jr., for an outstanding career, congratulates

3 him on his retirement, and thanks him for his contribu4 tions to baseball, to the State of Maryland, and to the

5 Nation.

Æ