alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Business and Economy    >Retail - Monthly    >FAQs    >Monthly Retail FAQs    >Sample Revision FAQs
 Skip to looking for section Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  Monthly Retail Trade Survey - Sample Revision FAQs  What is a sample revision and why is it necessary?  ensure each sample is representative of its target population
	improve the efficiency of each sample
	incorporate updates to the industry classification structure
	expand industry coverage of the survey
	update questions and instructions to obtain more accurate data
	redistribute burden for small and medium size businesses   How often is a sample revision performed for the Monthly Retail Trade Survey? How is the sample kept up-to-date between sample revisions?   When were estimates from the new Monthly Retail Trade Survey sample released?   What is the size of the Monthly Retail Trade Survey sample?   Are the estimates from different Monthly Retail Trade Survey samples comparable?   What was the impact of adopting the 2012 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) definitions for the Monthly Retail Trade Survey? summary of NAICS restatement and publication table changes


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #18067 and #18068; MISSISSIPPI Disaster Number MS-00154]
 AGENCY: Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Mississippi (FEMA-4727-DR), dated 08/12/2023. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Straight-line Winds, and Tornadoes. *Incident Period:*
                         06/14/2023 through 06/19/2023.
 DATES: Issued on 08/12/2023. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         10/11/2023. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/13/2024.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 08/12/2023, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):*
                     Jackson, Jasper. *Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):* *Mississippi:*
                     Clarke, George, Harrison, Jones, Lauderdale, Newton, Scott, Smith, Stone, Wayne. *Alabama:*
                     Mobile. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.000Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
8.000Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 18067 C and for economic injury is 18068 0. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Francisco Sánchez, Jr., Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.


[FR Doc. 2023-17933 Filed 8-18-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
§ 380.401 Certification document. ( a ) A student who successfully completes LCV driver training shall be issued a Driver-Training Certificate that is substantially in accordance with the following form.
( b ) An LCV driver must provide a copy of the Driver-Training Certificate to his/her employer to be filed in the Driver Qualification File.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsForbidden tangential orbit transfers between intersecting Keplerian orbitsThe classical problem of tangential impulse transfer between coplanar Keplerian orbits is addressed. A completely analytic solution which does not rely on sequential calculation is obtained and this solution is used to demonstrate that certain initially chosen angles can produce singularities in the parameters of the transfer orbit. A necessary and sufficient condition for such singularities is that the initial and final orbits intersect.Document ID19900016712Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsBurns, Rowland E.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1990Subject CategoryAstrodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-3031NAS 1.60:3031Accession Number90N26028Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900016712.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 511.47 Record. ( a ) *Reporting and transcription.* Hearings shall be recorded and transcribed under the supervision of the Presiding Officer by a reporter appointed by the Administrator. The original transcript shall be a part of the record and the official transcript. Copies of transcripts are available from the reporter at a cost not to exceed the maximum rates fixed by contract between the NHTSA and the reporter.
( b ) *Corrections.* Corrections of the official transcript may be made only when they involve errors affecting substance and then only in the manner herein provided. The Presiding Officer may order corrections, either on his or her own motion or on motion of any party. The Presiding Officer shall determine the corrections to be made and so order. Corrections shall be interlineated or otherwise inserted in the official transcript so as not to obliterate the original text.
#### Orville Dingee, *Respondent, v.*The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, *Appellant.*

— Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Pratt, J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
Exhibit 32-6



Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United
States Code



The undersigned officer hereby certifies,
as to the Report on Form 10-K of PECO Energy Company for the year ended December 31, 2003, that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained
in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PECO Energy Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                                               
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: February 20, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    J. BARRY MITCHELL                                                      
|                        |  |  |  |                                                                               
|                        |  |  |  | J. Barry Mitchell Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          13,265
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                17,705
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     55,219
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          22,373
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            22,514
<LOANS>                                        135,557
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 255,214
<DEPOSITS>                                     211,983
<SHORT-TERM>                                    12,424
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,470
<LONG-TERM>                                      5,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,932
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,405
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 255,214
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,739
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,303
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   379
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,421
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,035
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,391
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,030
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,760
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,643
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,643
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       964
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.60
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,909
<LOANS-PAST>                                       201
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   406
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  7,740
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,120
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     (171)
<RECOVERIES>                                       182
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,132
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,132
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Department of Labor

EBSA 

Proposed Fiduciary Rule

RE: RIN 1210-AB32, Proposed Fiduciary Rule

Your proposal is a good proposal and should be enacted with the following modifications (shown in 

parenthesis).

1. It imposes anew best interest contract through a legally binding contract between the 

advisor and the plan sponsor, plan participant or beneficiary, or IRA owner. Violations of this 

contract would be subject to an excise tax.

2. It would make obsolete the “suitability” test for brokers’ selling or providing an investment 

to a plan sponsor, participant or IRA owner. The “suitability” test is so amorphous as to be 

no test at all.

3. It would require that all those who provide investment products to the plan sponsors, 

participants or IRA owners do so only in the “best interest” of those clients or customers.

4. Further, it would require that advisors and brokers give prudent advice, not mislead the 

clients or customers, and charge only reasonable fees or commissions. 

(Such compensation should be fully disclosed to the clients or customers. How else can the 

reasonableness of fees or commissions be determined by the clients or customers?)

5. Finally it requires that policies and procedures are created to ensure that there is never an 

incentive to act in other than the client’s or customer’s best interest.

6. (One problem that is not addressed is the definition of reasonable. 

a. Is it reasonable to sell a plan participant an annuity with a 10% first year 

commission and a 15 year surrender period where the surrender penalty is 

10% each of the first three years, 5% for each of the next three years, 3% for the 

for each of the next five years, and 2% each year through the 15th year?

b. Is it reasonable to sell a plan participant an alternative investment with a 10% 

placement fee coupled with a 12% of annual gain fee? 

Neither of these products will be purchased by a knowledgeable participant, plan 

sponsor or IRA owner; however, such products, modified only in degree, are sold every

day to participants, plan sponsors or IRA owners who are not knowledgeable about 

investments but who trust. Salesmen sell; that’s what they do; and people buy. A 

capable and knowledgeable salesman can turn sand to gold dust and show how 

reasonable it really is. Many people trust. The definition of “reasonable” should be 

addressed.)

Thank you.
Editorial Note on Part 397
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 397 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 397.215 Waiver notice. ( a ) The applicant State, political subdivision thereof, or Indian tribe shall mail a copy of the application and any subsequent amendments or other documents relating to the application to each person whom the applicant reasonably ascertains will be affected by the determination sought. The copy of the application must be accompanied by a statement that the person may submit comments regarding the application to the Administrator within 45 days. The application filed with the Administrator must include a certification that the application complies with this paragraph and must include the names and addresses of each person to whom the application was sent.
( b ) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, if the State, political subdivision thereof, or Indian tribe determines that compliance with paragraph (a) of this section would be impracticable, the applicant shall: ( 1 ) Comply with the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section with regard to those persons whom it is reasonable and practicable to notify; and
( 2 ) Include with the application filed with the Administrator a description of the persons or class or classes of persons to whom notice was not sent.
( c ) The Administrator may require the applicant to provide notice in addition to that required by paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, or may determine that the notice required by paragraph (a) of this section is not impracticable, or that notice should be published in the Federal Register.
( d ) The Administrator may serve notice on any other persons readily identifiable by the Administrator as persons who will be affected by the determination sought and may afford those persons an opportunity to file written comments on the application.
( e ) Any person submitting written comments to the Administrator with respect to an application filed under this section shall send a copy of the comments to the applicant. The person shall certify to the Administrator that he or she has complied with the requirements of this paragraph. The Administrator may notify other persons participating in the proceeding of the comments and provide an opportunity for those other persons to respond.
[57 FR 44132, Sept. 24, 1992, as amended at 80 FR 59075, Oct. 1, 2015]
1210-AB32-2-1563.html[7/26/2015 7:41:14 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 11, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jx9-j8kl

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2060

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Tom Fudge

Address:

2536 Rimrock Ave

Ste 400-360

Grand Junction, CO, 81505

Email: tfudge55@gmail.com

General Comment

The proposed rules should in no way limit a persons ability to act as there own imvestment advisor independent

 of a Fiducuary.
Editorial Note on Part 386
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 386 appear at 65 FR 7755, Feb. 16, 2000, and 88 FR 80182, Nov. 17, 2023.

§ 386.1 Scope of the rules in this part. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, the rules in this part govern proceedings before the Agency Decisionmaker under applicable provisions of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (49 CFR parts 350-399), including the commercial regulations (49 CFR parts 360-379), and the Hazardous Materials Regulations (49 CFR parts 171-180).
( b ) The purpose of the proceedings is to enable the Assistant Administrator: ( 1 ) To determine whether a motor carrier, intermodal equipment provider (as defined in § 390.5 of this chapter), property broker, freight forwarder, or its agents, employees, or any other person subject to the jurisdiction of FMCSA, has failed to comply with the provisions or requirements of applicable statutes and the corresponding regulations; and
( 2 ) To issue an appropriate order to compel compliance with the statute or regulation, assess a civil penalty, or both, if such violations are found.
( c ) ( 1 ) The rules in § 386.12(a) govern the filing of a complaint of a substantial violation and the handling of the complaint by the appropriate Division Administrator.
( 2 ) The rules in § 386.12(b) govern the filing by a driver and the handling by the appropriate Division Administrator of a complaint of harassment in violation of § 390.36 of this subchapter.
( 3 ) The rules in § 386.12(c) govern the filing by a driver and the handling by the appropriate Division Administrator of a complaint of coercion in violation of § 390.6 of this subchapter.
[73 FR 76819, Dec. 17, 2008, as amended at 80 FR 74709, Nov. 30, 2015; 81 FR 78381, Dec. 16, 2015; 81 FR 68347, Oct. 4, 2016; 88 FR 80182, Nov. 17, 2023]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1166.html[7/22/2015 3:04:59 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvd-4ck2

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1166

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

Address:

2428 S. Willow Avenue

Broken Arrow, OK, 74012

Email: episa2@att.net

Phone: 9182501899

General Comment

Do not dare touching our 401-K. it is not government business!
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF A P P E A LS E LE V EN T H C IR C U IT DECEMBER 27, 2006 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN THCIRC UI T

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ N os. 05- 1586 0 & 05- 1609 6

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ N L RB N os. 12- CA -2 0173 & 12- CA -2 0527 & 12- CA -1 7385 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
ve rs us GIMROC K CONSTRUCTION, INC., Re spon de nt.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ Appl ic at ion s f

or E nf or ce m en t of

O rd er s of the N at ion al L ab or

Re latio ns B oard

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ (D ec em be r 27, 200 6) Be fo re E D MO N D SO N , Ch ie f Judg e, BA RKE T T and C O X , Ci rc uit Jud ge s. PE R CU RIA M: T his is a co nsol idatio n of tw o a ppl ic at ion s of the N at ion al L ab or Re latio ns Board (“ t h e Board”) to enforce its O rder ( R.3- 13 at 1-9) and its Suppl em ental De cision and Order (R.1-30 at 1-7) again st Gim rock Construction , I nc. ( “ Gim rock”).2

The I nternational Union of Operating E ngin eers, Loca l 487, AF L- CIO (“ the Union ”) ini tiate d th es e pr oc ee din gs by f ili ng unf ai r la bor pr ac tic e ch ar ge s a ga ins t G im ro ck
. Our obligation is to reviewthe rec ord to determ ine if the re is substantial
ev id en ce to supp ort t he Bo ard ’s fin di ng s. NLRB v . V aro, Inc. , 425 F. 2d 2 93, 296 ( 5th Ci r. 1970 )
. T h i s c o u rtw i l l e n f o r c e ano r d e r

e v e ni f i t“ w o u l dh av e m a d e d i f f e r e nt finding s upon a de nov o reviewof the evidence. ” Co op er /T

. Smi th , In c. v. NLRB , 177 F.3 d 1 25 9, 1 26 1 (1 1t h C ir. 1 99 9)
. Fo ur iss ue s are pr es en te d f

or our r ev ie w . F ir st, Re spon de nt c ha lle nge s th e Bo ar d’ s f ind ing that Gi m

ro ck vio late d 29 U
. S. C. § 15 8( a) (1 ) an d ( 5) by r ef usi ng the Un i o n ’s re qu es t s fo r p ayro l l re c o r d s . S ec o n d , R es p o n d en td i s p u t es th e B o ar d ’s fi ndi ng that G im

ro ck vio late d 29 U
. S. C. § 158( a) (1 ) an d (5 ) an d § 15 8( d) by r ef usi ng to m ee t and b ar ga in c oll ec tiv el y a ft er O ct obe r 27, 199 9. T hir d, Re spon de nt ch al le nge s th e Bo ar d’ s fi ndi ng that G im ro ck vio late d 29 U
. S. C. § 15 8( a) (1 ) an d ( 3) b y re fu s i n g t o re i n s t at e t h e U n i o ns tri k er s . Fo u rt h , Re s p o n d en t d i s p u t es th e B o ar d ’s fi ndi ng that the U nio n’ s barg ai nin g po sit iondid not ev ide nc e anunl aw fu l j ur isd ic tio n dis put e. H av ing r ev ie w ed the r ec or d, w e co nc lud e that su bst antia l e vid en ce sup ports the Bo ar d’ s f

ind ing s ona ll fo ur

iss ue s. T hus, the Bo ar d’ s O rd er ( R. 3- 13 at 1- 9) and it s Ord er fo ll owi ng it s Supp le m en ta l Dec is io n (R .1-3 0 a t 1 -7 ) wil l b e en fo rced
. ORDERS ENFORCE D.