alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                  ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Annual Report of Coastal  Caribbean Oils & Minerals,
Ltd. (the  "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Kenneth M. Cornell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



Date:  April 08, 2004                                By /s/ Kenneth M. Cornell
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Kenneth M. Cornell
                                                     Chief Accounting and
                                                     Financial Officer
#### § 299.309 Classes of track: operating speed limits.

(a) Except as provided in [paragraph (b)](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-299.309#p-299.309(b)) of this section and as otherwise provided in this part, the following maximum allowable operating speeds apply—

Table 1 to Paragraph (a)

| Over track that meets all of the requirements prescribed in this part for— | The maximum allowable operating speed in km/h (mph) |
| --- | --- |
| Class H0 track | 20 (12) |
| Class H1 track | 30 (19) |
| Class H2 track | 70 (44) |
| Class H3 track | 120 (75) |
| Class H4 track | 170 (106) |
| Class H5 track | 230 (143) |
| Class H6 track | 285 (177) |
| Class H7 track | 330 (205) |

(b) Except as provided in [paragraph (c)](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-299.309#p-299.309(c)) of this section, if a segment of track does not meet all of the requirements for its intended Class, it is to be reclassified to the next lower track Class for which it does meet all of the requirements of this part. However, if the segment of track does not at least meet the requirements for track Class H1 track, operations may continue at Class H1 speeds for a period of not more than 30 days without bringing the track into compliance, under the authority of an individual designated under [§ 299.353](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-299.353), after that individual determines that operations may safely continue and subject to any limiting conditions specified by such individual.

(c) If a segment of track designated as track Class H0 does not meet all of the requirements for its intended class, operations may continue at Class H0 speeds for a period of not more than 30 days without bringing the track into compliance, under the authority of an individual designated under [§ 299.353](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-299.353), after that individual determines that operations may safely continue and subject to any limiting conditions specified by such individual.

(d) No high-speed passenger trainset shall operate over track Class H0.
Editorial Note on Part 393
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 393 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 393.26 Requirements for reflectors. ( a ) *Mounting.* Reflex reflectors shall be mounted at the locations required by § 393.11. In the case of motor vehicles so constructed that requirement for a 381 mm (15-inch) minimum height above the road surface is not practical, the reflectors shall be mounted as close as practicable to the required mounting height range. All permanent reflex reflectors shall be securely mounted on a rigid part of the vehicle. Temporary reflectors on projecting loads must be securely mounted to the load and are not required to be permanently mounted to a part of the vehicle. Temporary reflex reflectors on vehicles transported in driveaway-towaway operations must be firmly attached.
( b ) *Specifications.* All required reflex reflectors (except reflex reflectors on projecting loads, vehicles transported in a driveaway-towaway operation, converter dollies and pole trailers) on vehicles manufactured on or after December 25, 1968, shall meet the applicable requirements of FMVSS No. 108 in effect on the date of manufacture of the vehicle. Reflex reflectors on projecting loads, vehicles transported in a driveaway-towaway operation, and all reflex reflectors on converter dollies and pole trailers must conform to SAE J594—Reflex Reflectors, December 2003.
( c ) *Substitute material for side reflex reflectors.* Reflective material conforming to ASTM D 4956-04, Standard Specification for Retroreflective Sheeting for Traffic Control, may be used in lieu of reflex reflectors if the material as used on the vehicle, meets the performance standards in either Table I of SAE J594 or Table IA of SAE J594—Reflex Reflectors, December 2003. (See § 393.7(b) for information on the incorporation by reference and availability of these documents.)
( d ) *Use of additional retroreflective surfaces.* Additional retroreflective surfaces may be used in conjunction with, but not in lieu of the reflex reflectors required in subpart B of part 393, and the substitute material for side reflex reflectors allowed by paragraph (c) of this section, provided: ( 1 ) Designs do not resemble traffic control signs, lights, or devices, except that straight edge striping resembling a barricade pattern may be used.
( 2 ) Designs do not tend to distort the length and/or width of the motor vehicle.
( 3 ) Such surfaces shall be at least 3 inches from any required lamp or reflector unless of the same color as such lamp or reflector.
( 4 ) No red color shall be used on the front of any motor vehicle, except for display of markings or placards required by § 177.823 of this title.
( 5 ) Retroreflective license plates required by State or local authorities may be used.
[33 FR 19735, Dec. 25, 1968, as amended at 35 FR 3167, Feb. 19, 1970; 53 FR 49397, Dec. 7, 1988; 70 FR 48047, Aug. 15, 2005]
Exhibit 10.1



 







EXHIBIT 10.1




SECOND AMENDMENT TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this
“Amendment”) is entered into effective as of March 27, 2006, by and between CancerVax
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and David F. Hale
(“Executive”).



     WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend that certain Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement dated as of November 15, 2004, between the Company and Executive (as amended
to date, the “Original Agreement”) on the terms and conditions set forth herein.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the various covenants and agreements hereinafter set
forth, the parties hereto agree as follows:



     1. Amendment to Section 4(g)(vi). A new sentence is added at the end of Section
4(g)(vi) of the Original Agreement to read as follows:



                  “Notwithstanding the foregoing, none of the Stock Awards granted to Executive on March 20,
2006 shall accelerate pursuant to clauses (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) or (v) of this Section
4(g).”



     2. No Other Amendments. Except as expressly provided for in this Amendment, no other
term or provision of the Original Agreement is amended or modified in any respect.



(Signature Page Follows)




 









 





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first set forth
above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	CANCERVAX CORPORATION
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ William R. LaRue
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	William R. LaRue
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ David F. Hale
	 	 	 
	 	 	David F. Hale






[SIGNATURE PAGE TO SECOND AMENDMENT TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT]
25th CAB medevac crew receives Australian award
 By Sgt. Daniel Schroeder , 25th Combat Aviation Brigade Public Affairs
  Australian Army Soldiers load an injured Soldier onto a UH-60 Black Hawk from Company C, 3rd Battalion, 25th Aviation Regiment, Task Force Gunfighters, 25th Combat Aviation Brigade, during a medical evacuation training mission at Multinational Base Tarin Kowt, Afghanistan, Oct. 1, 2012. (Photo by Spc. Nevada Jack Smith)
 MULTINATIONAL BASE TARIN KOT, Afghanistan (Nov. 1, 2012) — Australian Forces at Multinational Base Tarin Kot, Afghanistan, recognized the actions of a medical evacuation crew from Company C, 3rd Battalion, 25th Aviation Regiment, Task Force Gunfighters, 25th Combat Aviation Brigade, during an awards ceremony, Oct. 18. Chief of Joint Operations Australia Lt. Gen. Ash Power, AO, CSC, presented the medevac crew with the Chief of Joint Operations Gold Commendation for their actions during a medical evacuation, or medevac, request in the Uruzgan province, Afghanistan, Aug. 23. “I felt really honored to receive this award,” said Capt. Zach Mauss, platoon leader for Forward Support Medical Platoon 3, C/3-25 AVN, 25th CAB. “Our partnership here with the Australians is extremely strong. They are incredibly professional soldiers and take great pride in the work they do in Uruzgan province. Taking care of their fellow soldiers and willingness to take the fight to the enemy are some similarities they share with U.S. Soldiers.” Before the Soldiers were presented with a framed certificate and two medals, Power spoke to roughly 200 Soldiers in attendance on the medevac crew’s actions. On the afternoon of Aug. 23, the medevac crew on duty received a “CAT A” 9-line medevac request. CAT A, or Category Alpha, refers to urgent medical care needed – evacuate immediately. The victim was an Australian soldier who received severe wounds to both legs caused by an improvised explosive device, or IED. The crew flew out to the location as quickly as they could. Upon arrival, the medevac pilots had to perform a two-wheeled landing due to the terrain limitations where the wounded soldier was. In less than one minute, the soldier was loaded onto the helicopter and headed to the nearest medical facility. The medics in the aircraft worked feverishly to restore the vital signs of the injured soldier. With the distance to the patient and then to the nearest medical facility, the medevac crew managed to complete the mission in 52 minutes. This was within the “golden hour” – the time allotted from the time the call comes in to fly out and evacuate the patient to the nearest medical facility giving the patient the best chance of saving their life. “The most rewarding part of the night was following the ceremony when members of the unit that hit the IED came forward to individually thank us for the work we did in saving their comrade,” said Mauss. “Although their comrade was severely injured, they were relieved that he is now home with his family in Australia making a strong recovery.”
#### § 564.3 Applicability.

This part applies to replaceable light sources used as original equipment, and standardized sealed beam headlamp units used as original equipment and replacement equipment in motor vehicle headlighting systems.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 876 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 876

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a 5-year 
      extension of the credit for electricity produced from wind.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2001

   Mr. Foley (for himself, Mr. Weller, Mr. Matsui, Mrs. Thurman, Mr. 
  Watkins, Mr. Portman, Mr. Ramstad, and Mr. McCrery) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a 5-year 
      extension of the credit for electricity produced from wind.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 5-YEAR EXTENSION OF CREDIT FOR ELECTRICITY PRODUCED FROM 
              WIND.

    Section 45(c)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating 
to wind facility) is amended by striking ``2002'' and inserting 
``2007''.
                                 <all>
```
May 27,2015 The Honorable Anthony Foxx Secretary of Transportation 

# laVHTA Virginia Hospitality & Travel Association

U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 RE: DOT-OST-2015-0082 Dear Secretary Foxx: As an organization devoted to representing the interests of the hospitality industry, the Virginia Hospitality and Travel Association (VHTA) is dependent on tourists and business travelers visiting our state. That is why we are asking you to please maintain competition in the airline industry and abstain from renegotiating the Open Skies agreements that could restrict the routes of three superior airlines. The VHTA is an organization made up of a number of hospitality associations that have joined together to further the legislative priorities and interests of restaurants, hotels, attractions and destinations in the State of Virginia . Our member associations value inclusion and protecting free enterprise to promote and flourish our industries. The attempts by the "Big 3" domestic airlines to have the U .S. government revisit the Open Skies agreements with Qatar and the United Arab Emirates go against our basic mission and vision as an organization. By requesting to freeze the route connections offered by Etihad Airways, Qatar Airways , and Emirates, they are clearly trying to exclude these carriers from competition in the airline industry, going against the very definition of free enterprise. We should all be concerned that U.S. based carriers may not be providing the level of service to their customers that they should be , even though these airlines continue to raise fares, although fuel prices are down , and also charge exorbitant additional fees. Their effort to restrict the Gulf States' airlines is an attempt to restrict travelers to fly with them because there will be less superior, lower cost alternatives. In sum, we urge you to reject Delta's, American's and United's request and preserve inclusion and free enterprise in the travel industry by refusing to renegotiate the Open Skies agreements. Please allow for more option s for all travelers so we can continue to grow the hospitality industry in this country and abroad. Sincerely,

Eric Terry President Virginia Hospitality & Travel Association Serving the Lodging, Restaurant 

### & Travel Industries. 2101 Libbie Avenue • Richmond , Virginia 23230-2621 • 804-288-3065 • Fax 804-285-3093 VIRG INI A IS FOR L0¥ERS
§ 237.155 Documents and records. Each track owner required to implement a bridge management program and keep records under this part shall make those program documents and records available for inspection and reproduction by the Federal Railroad Administration. ( a ) *Electronic recordkeeping; general.* For purposes of compliance with the recordkeeping requirements of this part, a track owner may create and maintain any of the records required by this part through electronic transmission, storage, and retrieval provided that all of the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The system used to generate the electronic record meets all requirements of this subpart;
( 2 ) The electronically generated record contains the information required by this part;
( 3 ) The track owner monitors its electronic records database through sufficient number of monitoring indicators to ensure a high degree of accuracy of these records;
( 4 ) The track owner shall train its employees who use the system on the proper use of the electronic recordkeeping system; and
( 5 ) The track owner maintains an information technology security program adequate to ensure the integrity of the system, including the prevention of unauthorized access to the program logic or individual records.
( b ) *System security.* The integrity of the bridge inspection records must be protected by a security system that incorporates a user identity and password, or a comparable method, to establish appropriate levels of program and record data access meeting all of the following standards: ( 1 ) No two individuals have the same electronic identity;
( 2 ) A record cannot be deleted or altered by any individual after the record is certified by the employee who created the record;
( 3 ) Any amendment to a record is either— ( i ) Electronically stored apart from the record that it amends; or
( ii ) Electronically attached to the record as information without changing the original record;
( 4 ) Each amendment to a record uniquely identifies the person making the amendment; and
( 5 ) The electronic system provides for the maintenance of inspection records as originally submitted without corruption or loss of data.
October 1 , 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KISH DANO POWELL , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00653

- CV V.

MONICA POWELL , Appellee

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on June 10, 2013. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant, Kish Dano Powell.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 24, 1995 (133), Para 133.7 Corrections Calendar]
[Page 1572]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.133.7  corrections calendar

  Pursuant to clause 4, rule XIII,
  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. FOLEY, directed the Corrections Calendar 
to be called and, by unanimous consent, it was made in order to consider 
the bill designated as calendar number 3 after all other bills on said 
calendar.
  When,
```
#### Theodore Baker et al., Appellants, *v.*Mary E. Duff et al., Respondents.

*Baker*v. *Duff,*136 App. Div. 13, affirmed.

(Argued May 9, 1911;

decided May 30, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, *571entered February 11,1910, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term in an action of ejectment.

*Frank Hendrick*and *Ernest M. Garbe*for appellants.

*Charles E. Hill*and *Sidney F. Rawson*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Chase and Collin, JJ. Absent: Hiscock, J.
#### The People of the State of New York, v. Universal Life Insurance Company. (Matter of Henry C. Bowen.)

Order affirmed, except that portion which relates to value of policies, which is reversed; no costs to either party^ Opinion by

Brady, J.
City of Waco, Texas and Fire 

Chief John D. 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 19, 2014

No. 04-13-00460-CV

Chad THOMPSON,

Appellant

v.

CITY OF WACO, TEXAS and Fire Chief John D. Johnston,

Appellees

From the 414th Judicial District Court, McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-3519-5

Vicki Lynn Menard, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

The court has considered Appellee’s motion for en banc reconsideration; the motion is 

DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.7.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of June, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
From: Bob Hassman [mailto:rhassman@fuse.net] 

Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 9:23 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Fiduciary Rule

To Whom it may concern,

I am an insurance producer and I currently do everything possible to make sure that my clients 

best interests are of primary concern. This rule would only add additional work to my already 

busy day. I really believe that this is only in the interest of financial agents and makes this 

uncompetitive. 

I ask that you do not pass this rule.

Thanks for your interest in this matter.

Bob Hassman

95 Orchard Hill Rd

Ft Thomas KY 41075

859-653-6014

Email: rhassman@fuse.net
----

| (1)   | the      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;    and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | August      7, 2008 | /s/      William M. Salters  |   |
|--------|---------------------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|   |                | William      M. Salters           |   |
|   |                | Chief      Financial Officer      |   |
Exhibit 32-7



Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United
States Code



The undersigned officer hereby certifies,
as to the Report on Form 10-K of Exelon Generation Company, LLC for the year ended December 31, 2003, that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information
contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Exelon Generation Company, LLC.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                             
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: February 20, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    OLIVER D. KINGSLEY JR.                               
|                        |  |  |  |                                                             
|                        |  |  |  | Oliver D. Kingsley Jr. Chief Executive Officer and President