alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Denver

7700 East First Place

Denver, Colorado 80230-7143

Phone 303.364.7700 Fax 303.364.7800

Washington

444 North Capitol Street, N.W. Suite 515

Washington, D.C. 20001

Phone 202.624.5400 Fax 202.737.1069

Website www.ncsl.org

Email info@ncsl.org

Curtis Bramble

Sena te Presid ent Pro Tempor e

U ta h

Pr esident , NCSL

Karl Aro

Dir ecto r o f Ad ministr at io n

Dep art ment o f Legisla t ive Ser vic es

Mar yla nd

Sta ff Cha ir , NCSL

William T. P ound

Execut ive Direct or

September 23, 2015

The Honorable Thomas Perez,

Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor

Office of Regulations and Interpretations,

Employee Benefits Security Administration, Room N-5655

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20210

Dear Secretary Perez:

I write to you on behalf of the National Conference of State Legislatures (“NCSL”) regarding the 

Department of Labor’s proposed rule change concerning conflicts of interest, and as to what 

constitutes a fiduciary in relation to plans under the Employment Retirement Security Act of 1974 

(“ERISA”) and IRAs under Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. I urge the U.S. 

Department of Labor to extend the window for comments in this proceeding to provide additional 

state input.

These rules will invariably affect each and every state, and it is incumbent upon the agency to seek out 

their valuable expertise before issuing a final rule. State legislatures play an important role in the 

regulation of insurance. NCSL recognizes that the federal government has an interest in efficient and 

fair capital markets. NCSL also acknowledges that the states’ securities agencies are indispensable 

partners with their federal counterparts engaging in the pursuit of fair and efficient capital markets by 

protecting local investors, workers, and communities by ensuring compliance with securities laws.

Due to the increasing number of retirees in the “baby boomer” generation, and the increasing 

complexity of our financial markets, the need for adequate protections may be stronger than ever. 

While proposed rules seek to more clearly attenuate the potentially lopsided nature of the relationship 

between broker-dealers and other financial services professionals and their clients, this decision should 

come after careful deliberation. I invite you to use NCSL as a resource to maintain an open dialogue 

between the states and the federal government on this matter.

Sincerely,

William Pound

Executive Director, NCSL
#### William I. Chase and another, *Respondents, v.*Nelson Chase and others, *Respondents.*Marcus L. Stieglitz, *Purchaser, Appellant.*

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         400,983
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  260,340
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               815,871
<PP&E>                                         206,990
<DEPRECIATION>                                 164,419
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 978,542
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          273,091
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       871,286
<OTHER-SE>                                   (215,835)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   978,542
<SALES>                                      1,702,862
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,704,961
<CGS>                                          832,748
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  695,716
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,838
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                170,659
<INCOME-TAX>                                    32,482
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            138,177
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   138,177
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2013

s0722 

# Order

Clerk July 30, 2013

146775

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146775

COA: 311906

Oakland CC: 2005

- 205535

- FC

TREMAYNE D. SHELTON

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 3, 2013 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc. ((PNBC() on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the (Report(), I Todd D. Fanning, Senior Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer of PNBC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of PNBC.






/s/ Todd D. FanningTodd D. FanningSenior Vice-President & Chief Financial OfficerMay 9, 2008






---
# 2008

# 2007

# 2006

# 2005

# 2004

# 2003

# 2002

# 2001

# 2000

# 1999

# 1998

# 1997

# 1996

# 1995

# 1994

# 1993

# 1992
#### § 601.29 Additional rulemaking proceedings.

The Administrator may initiate any further rulemaking proceedings that he/she finds necessary or desirable. For example, interested persons may be invited to make oral arguments, to participate in conferences between the Administrator or his/her representative at which minutes of the conference are kept, to appear at informal hearings presided over by officials designated by the Administrator at which a transcript or minutes are kept, or participate in any other proceeding to assure informed administrative action and to protect the public interest.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Bumgardner, Kelsey and Senior Judge Hodges 

FLOYD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD AND 

 VSBA WORKERS’ COMP GROUP/ 

 ACORDIA EMPLOYERS SERVICE 

v. Record No. 3020-03-3 

RANDALL WOOLWINE MEMORANDUM OPINION*

 PER CURIAM 

 MARCH 16, 2004 

RANDALL WOOLWINE 

v. Record No. 3046-03-3 

FLOYD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD AND 

 VSBA WORKERS’ COMP GROUP/ 

 ACORDIA EMPLOYERS SERVICE 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Ramesh Murthy; Lisa Frisina Clements; PennStuart, on briefs), for 

Floyd County School Board and VSBA Workers’ Comp 

Group/Acordia Employers Service. 

 (Brenda C. Moses; Montgomery & Moses, PC, on brief), for Randall 

Woolwine in Record No. 3020-03-3. 

 (Randall W. Woolwine, pro se, on brief), in Record No. 3046-03-3. 

 Floyd County School Board and its insurer (hereinafter referred to as “employer”) appeal 

a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that Randall Woolwine’s 

(claimant) current medical condition and treatment are related to his compensable March 6, 2002 

injury by accident and that Drs. Glen L. Sublette and Kevin Kelleher are authorized treating 

physicians and that any referrals made by those physicians for treatment that is causally related 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 
 - 2 -

to the March 6, 2002 injury by accident, are the employer’s responsibility. In his cross-appeal, 

Woolwine appeals the commission’s findings that he failed to prove he was totally disabled 

beginning December 12, 2002 and that even if he proved he was partially disabled as of that 

date, he failed to prove he made a reasonable effort to market his remaining work capacity. We 

have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See

Woolwine v. Floyd (County of) School Board, VWC File No. 209-02-00 (Oct. 23, 2003). We 

dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm with respect to the issues raised in both 

appeals because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 

5A:27.1 

Affirmed.

 1

 We deny employer’s Motion to Dismiss Record Number 3046-03-3 as claimant’s brief 

was timely filed. In addition, we deny claimant’s request to expedite this case.
From: definefunk@gmail.com [mailto:definefunk@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Francis Luong 

(Franco) 

Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 10:57 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

I'm completely opposed to any government takeover or management of retirement 

accounts like 401(k)s. 

Any government seizing of 401(k)s would be theft. Respect property rights: hands off our 

retirement savings! 

Francis Luong 

2320 DULLES STATION BLVD 

APT 1137 

HERNDON, VA 20171
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 160 (Monday, August 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 56849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-17960]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Diet, mitochondria and multi-system regeneration and 
rejuvenation.
    Date: October 18, 2023.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Ivan Tadeu Rebustini, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institutes of Health, 
National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, RM: 100, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 555-1212, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c9a0bfa8a7e7bbacabbcbabda0a7a089a7a0a1e7aea6bf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5c352a3d32722e393e292f283532351c323534723b332a">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 16, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-17960 Filed 8-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
-----Original Message-----

From: mailagent@thesoftedge.com [mailto:mailagent@thesoftedge.com] On Behalf Of 

Sheryl@GarrettPlanning.com

Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 10:31 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Stop Wall Street from draining Americans' retirement savings RIN 1210-AB32

Dear U.S. Department of Labor:

You are a person of great conviction and I admire you immensely for assertively pursuing what you 

believe will improve America and each citizen's life.

I feel the same way and I strongly support the Department of Labor's efforts to strengthen protection 

for working families and retirees by requiring the financial professionals they turn to for retirement 

investment advice to act in their best interest. To me this is simply the "Golden Rule" - do unto others 

as you would have them do unto you - rather than "gold rules", which too often is the case now.

Some call this proposal "unworkable". Inconvenient maybe, but not unworkable. Doing the right thing 

may not be the easiest way to do business, but it is still the right thing to do. Principled people do what 

is right! You are a principled person!

Stating that this proposal is unworkable is short changing American ingenuity! Tens of thousands of 

financial advisors have been working with middle-income Americans for the last several years as 

fiduciaries, and they are proving that it can be done and it is good for business. 

We have seen a dramatic increase in the quality and quantity of low-cost investment options and 

fiduciary financial advisory services available to middle-income Americans in the last 5 to 20 years. This 

new rule will serve as a catalyst to exponentially accelerate this evolution in our nascent profession. 

This is what the public - our society - needs and deserves.

Requiring all those who render retirement investment advice to put their clients' best interest first - by 

law - will go a long way toward rebuilding the faith that many Americans have lost in the financial 

services industry and the capital markets. With more people participating in the capital markets and 

saving most effectively for their retirement, the individuals, society and our economy will all benefit.

Sincerely,

Sheryl Garrett

803 County Road 317

Eureka Springs, AR 72632-9511
-----Original Message----- 

From: Veronica McDavid [mailto:vmcdavid@mac.com] 

Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 11:22 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Annuities 

Annuities cannot protect policyholders from inflation, and it is naive 

to assume that inflation will never exist again at a time when the 

nation is so much in debt. 

Annuities can only be one sector of an investment portfolio--and a 

small sector at that! A portfolio needs to be balanced and diverse. 

Even the crafters of Social Security realized that payments would need 

to be adjusted for inflation. 

People need to begin learning the financial facts of life when they are 

in grade school, not when they're retiring. They need to know that they 

must always save, but that at the same time risk is in inherent part of 

investing--the best they can do is diversify their risk. 

Veronica McDavid 

35 E 85th St. 4CN 

New York, NY 10028
Submitted Via Email to e-ORI@dol.gov

February 4, 2011

Office of Regulations and Interpretations

Employee Benefits Security Administration

Attn: Fiduciary Definition Hearing

Room N-5655

U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20210

Re: Written request to be heard at Fiduciary Definition Hearing

Dear Sir or Madam:

J.P. Morgan Retirement Plan Services LLC requests the opportunity to testify at 

the Department of Labor’s (DOL) hearing to be held at the DOL on March 1,

2011. We have several concerns regarding the proposed rules published on 

October 22, 2010 and appreciate the opportunity to share our concerns with the 

DOL.

Our witness will be Karen Prange, Executive Director and Assistant General 

Counsel, J.P. Morgan Retirement Plan Services. Ms. Prange will address in her 

testimony:

1. The definition of fiduciary should include clear and objective standards, 

including a requirement that all advice be individualized to the needs of 

the recipient and subject to a mutual agreement between the provider 

and recipient.

2. The limitations to the definition of fiduciary relating to sales or 

marketing through a platform should be clarified and broadly

interpreted to recognize the variety of services provided to plan 

sponsors in monitoring plan investments.

3. The definition of fiduciary advice should not encompass 

recommendations related to taking a plan distribution.

4. The DOL should consider re-proposing the proposed rule after 

considering the written comments and testimony at the public hearing.

J.P. Morgan Retirement Plan Services appreciates your consideration of our 

request to testify. Should you have any questions, please contact Robert 

Holcomb at 816-673-4480.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0998.html[7/22/2015 6:08:46 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-nmta

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0998

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Stuart Brogden

Address:

1354 SW 1100th Ave

Wilburton, OK, 74578

Email: sbrogden@gmail.com

Phone: 8327685162

General Comment

We have much more government than we can tolerate. Every time the national government gets involved in any

 segment of the economy, everyone EXCEPT the national government suffers. We need less government, not

 more. I don't need nor want the national government helping me plan my retirement or manage my 401(k). Ya'll

 need to STOP the constant encroachment into our lives and peel the government back to those activities

 permitted by the Consitution - nothing more.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Monthly Retail Trade
 You are here: Census.gov › Business & Industry › Retail › Monthly › Annual Revision of Monthly Retail and Food Servcies Skip top of page navigation
 Main
          About the Surveys
          Get Forms
          Historical Data
		  State Retail Sales
          How the Data are Collected
          Definitions
          FAQs
  Annual Revision of Monthly Retail and Food Services: Sales and Inventories—January 1992 Through March 2020 Introduction [PDF, 108KB]

                        Estimates of Monthly Retail and Food
                        Services Sales by Kind of Business: January 1992 Through March 2020
                                        [Excel, 736KB]

                        Estimates of End-of-Month Retail
                        Inventories and Inventories/Sales Ratios by Kind of Business: January 1992 Through February 2020
                                        [Excel, 455KB]

                    **Appendices:**Explanatory Material [PDF, 35KB]Estimated Measures of Sampling
                                                Variability for Monthly Estimates by Kind of Business: 2020
                                                [Excel, 55KB]
                                                NAICS Codes, Titles, and Descriptions

                        **Adjustment Factors for Seasonal and Other Variations of Monthly Estimates:**Sales [TEXT, 8KB]
                        Inventories [TEXT, 3KB]
 Microsoft® Excel® Viewer  free
 CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 3, 2020

NO. 03-20-00346-CV

R. V., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 459TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES BAKER AND KELLY

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the decree of termination signed by the trial court on June 26, 2020.

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no 

reversible error in the decree. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s decree of termination.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.