alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register: March 31, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 61)]
[Notices]               
[Page 16070]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr31mr10-32]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

 
Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of meeting cancellation.

SUMMARY: On March 18, 2010 (75 FR 13076) the U.S. Commission on Civil 
Rights announced a business meeting to be held on Friday, March 26, 
2010 at the Commission's headquarters. On Thursday, March 25, 2010, the 
meeting was cancelled. The decision to cancel the meeting was too close 
in time to the day of the meeting for the publication of a cancellation 
notice to appear in advance of the scheduled meeting date. The details 
of the cancelled meeting are:

DATE AND TIME: Friday, March 26, 2010; 11:30 a.m. EDT.

PLACE: Via Teleconference. Public Dial in: 1-800-597-7623. Conference 
ID  63007474.
    Meeting open to public.

Meeting Agenda

    This meeting is open to the public, except where noted otherwise.

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Program Planning
     Approval of Letter to Youngstown, Ohio City Council 
Members re Racially Bifurcated Test Results in the Police and Fire 
Departments
     Update on Status of 2010 Enforcement Report--Some of the 
discussion of this agenda item may be held in closed session.
     Update on Status of Title IX Project--Some of the 
discussion of this agenda item may be held in closed session.
III. Adjourn

    The Commission's next scheduled meeting is Friday, April 16, 2010, 
the details of which will be published in the Federal Register eight 
days prior to that meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.
    Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an 
interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at 
least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-
8116.

    Dated: March 29, 2010.
David Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-7313 Filed 3-29-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of eAutoclaims, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 21, 2009 (the Report), I, Larry Colton, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.

        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of eAutoclaims, Inc.




By:

        /s/ Larry ColtonPrint Name:  Larry ColtonTitle:  Chief Financial OfficerJanuary 21, 2009










---
From: Shaun Mullins [mailto:shaunmullins1@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 9:33 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210–AB33

To whom it may concern: 

It appears that this proposed future legislation will confiscate the money in my retirement 

nest egg (401k & IRA) in exchange for a guaranteed lifetime income to be provided by 

the federal government. If I have misinterpreted the language, please set me straight, 

because the rest of this message is in regard to that understanding. 

I am totally 100% opposed to anything that even remotely resembles a plan for the 

government to take control of my personal retirement savings that I have worked so hard 

for so many years to put away. How dare the government even consider doing this to the 

citizens of this country. If this idea is not immediately sent to the trash heap of history, I 

can assure you I will work tirelessly and endlessly to ensure that any politician who 

supports this idiotic scheme is put out of office as soon as possible!!! 

No, No, No, No, No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

Shaun Mullins 

Knoxville, TN
# Leaning on Partnership

/ Published July 30, 2019
FORT CAMPBELL, Ky., 
“Opportunities increase when you help others win. A little win for a partner is a little win for you.”Building on a more than two-and-a-half-decade partnership with the United States, senior leaders of the Kazakhstan Ground Forces visited their military counterparts in the 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault), July 22-26.The purpose of their visit was to observe and discuss best practices regarding the nature of command relationships, the roles and responsibilities of officers and senior noncommissioned officers on the brigade and battalion staff, the employment and sustainment of light infantry units in support of multinational operations with an anticipation of improving operations of their ground forces in Kazakhstan.“Our military is a very young military and [the American] military is very experienced and powerful,” said Lt. Col. Albol Zhussupov, brigade commander of Military Unit 31767. “What we saw here we will try to implement at home [and] It will raise the level of readiness of our military.”The KGF leaders were escorted within the 3RD Brigade Combat Team’s footprint, The Staff Sergeant John W. Kreckel NCO Academy and The Sabalauski Air Assault School where they were given multiple briefings, tours and demonstrations to illustrate how the U.S. Army implements training, the importance of commander and NCO relationships, professional development and many more areas of emphases in leadership, according to the U.S. Army model.Kazakhstan has made significant strides over the last twenty plus years placing capable NCOs complementing their officers in positions ranging from the platoon level to the Land Forces Commander’s level. The next phase, based on recommendations from the United States Army Forces, Central Command, is to integrate battalion and brigade staffs with experienced NCOs, to improve operations and logistics, as well as to mentor inexperienced junior officers.According to Capt. Ken Lorang, the U.S. Army Central desk officer for Kazakhstan, “the KGF’s persistent engagement and determination to develop and grow capabilities is the key to their continued success, not only in NCO Corps development but also in other areas, such as peacekeeping, medical services, and engineering. As most western military officers might expect, the NCO Corps development in Kazakhstan is a key component to KGF achievement of critical capabilities because it undergirds and speeds the development.”“We’ve already started implementing this American system of officer, NCO collaborations,” said Sgt. 1st Class Noyan Shekimov, brigade command sergeant major of Military Unit 31767. “And I’ve seen a lot here I would like to take to improve on my people back home.”The Kazakhstan Ground Forces have the most developed NCO Corps in Central Asia and serves as a model for other Central Asian States, creating an effective and robust NCO corps, enabling commanders to have greater capacity and staff sections to be more effective.

----
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
129754 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129754 COA: 262639 Genesee CC: 04-014222-FH IAN DOUGLAS MACDONALD, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 6, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY , J., would hold this case in abeyance for People v Drohan , lv gtd 472 Mich 881 (2005).

p0221 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 27, 2006

Clerk
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1431.html[7/23/2015 10:37:37 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvn-6g42

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1431

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Taylor Ronald

General Comment

TEA now my retirement, is all of the taxes and health care not enough? I have planed my retirement and I do not

 want you involved.

 I see Social Security and all of the other failed government programs and I do not want to entrust my retirement

 with them. They may 

want to give it to someone that has not done anything for anyone or them self and expect a handout! ENOUGH

 Enough Enough!
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/18/15 9:47 PM

Received: July 15, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8k01-wefb

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2370

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Brian Warren

General Comment

I don't need you or anyone else telling me how to plan for retirement. I am capable and very well 

educated on how to plan for myself. Stop trying to run this country into the ground.
Editorial Note on Part 587
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 587 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 587.18 Dimensions of fixed rigid barrier. ( a ) The fixed rigid barrier has a mass of not less than 7 × 104 kg (154,324 lb).
( b ) The height of the fixed rigid barrier is at least as high as the highest point on the vehicle at the intersection of the vertical transverse plane tangent to the forwardmost point of both front tires, when the tires are parallel to the longitudinal centerline of the vehicle, and the vertical plane through the longitudinal centerline of the vehicle.
#### § 588.6 Record retention.

Each manufacturer, or manufacturer's designee, shall maintain the information specified in § 588.5 of this part for a registered restraint system for a period of not less than six years from the date of manufacture of that restraint system.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 163 (Thursday, August 24, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57950-57951]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18254]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas and Oil Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP23-969-000.
    Applicants: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: TPC 2023-08-18 GT&C Section 3 
Revision to be effective 9/18/2023.

[[Page 57951]]

    Filed Date: 8/18/23.
    Accession Number: 20230818-5078.
    Comment Date: 5 pm ET 8/30/23.

    Any person desiring to intervene, to protest, or to answer a 
complaint in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with 
Rules 211, 214, or 206 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211, 
385.214, or 385.206) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the 
specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is 
necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Dated: August 18, 2023.
    For other information, call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, 
call (202) 502-8659. The Commission's Office of Public Participation 
(OPP) supports meaningful public engagement and participation in 
Commission proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including 
landowners, environmental justice communities, Tribal members and 
others, access publicly available information and navigate Commission 
processes. For public inquiries and assistance with making filings such 
as interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is 
encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#87c8d7d7c7e1e2f5e4a9e0e8f1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0a455a5a4a6c6f7869246d657c">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: August 18, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-18254 Filed 8-23-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1210-AB32-2-1431.html[7/26/2015 5:04:35 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwb-jez8

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1927

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Stay out of my business. Why? look at how well the bureaucrats are running this nation. Nobody wants the

 "nanny state" making decisions. The "state" can't even run its own business . We the people own the govt. and

 we the people will decide how we manage OUR money!
§ 655.73 Access to facilities and records. ( a ) Except as required by law, or expressly authorized or required in this section, no employer may release information pertaining to a covered employee that is contained in records required to be maintained by § 655.71.
( b ) A covered employee is entitled, upon written request, to obtain copies of any records pertaining to the covered employee's use of prohibited drugs or misuse of alcohol, including any records pertaining to his or her drug or alcohol tests. The employer shall provide promptly the records requested by the employee. Access to a covered employee's records shall not be contingent upon the employer's receipt of payment for the production of those records.
( c ) An employer shall permit access to all facilities utilized and records compiled in complying with the requirements of this part to the Secretary of Transportation or any DOT agency with regulatory authority over the employer or any of its employees or to a State oversight agency authorized to oversee rail fixed guideway systems.
( d ) An employer shall disclose data for its drug and alcohol testing programs, and any other information pertaining to the employer's anti-drug and alcohol misuse programs required to be maintained by this part, to the Secretary of Transportation or any DOT agency with regulatory authority over the employer or covered employee or to a State oversight agency authorized to oversee rail fixed guideway systems, upon the Secretary's request or the respective agency's request.
( e ) When requested by the National Transportation Safety Board as part of an accident investigation, employers shall disclose information related to the employer's drug or alcohol testing related to the accident under investigation.
( f ) Records shall be made available to a subsequent employer upon receipt of a written request from the covered employee. Subsequent disclosure by the employer is permitted only as expressly authorized by the terms of the covered employee's request.
( g ) An employer may disclose information required to be maintained under this part pertaining to a covered employee to the employee or the decisionmaker in a lawsuit, grievance, or other proceeding initiated by or on behalf of the individual, and arising from the results of a drug or alcohol test under this part (including, but not limited to, a worker's compensation, unemployment compensation, or other proceeding relating to a benefit sought by the covered employee.)
( h ) An employer shall release information regarding a covered employee's record as directed by the specific, written consent of the employee authorizing release of the information to an identified person.
( i ) An employer may disclose drug and alcohol testing information required to be maintained under this part, pertaining to a covered employee, to the State oversight agency or grantee required to certify to FTA compliance with the drug and alcohol testing procedures of 49 CFR parts 40 and 655.
Editorial Note on Part 325
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 325 appear at 66 FR 49869, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 325.37 Location and operation of sound level measurement system; highway operations. ( a ) The microphone of a sound level measurement system that conforms to the rules in § 325.23 of this part shall be located at a height of not less than 2 feet (.6 m) nor more than 6 feet (1.8 M) above the plane of the roadway surface and not less than 31 ⁄ 2 feet (1.1 m) above the surface on which the microphone stands. The preferred microphone height on flat terrain is 4 feet (1.2 m).
( b ) ( 1 ) When the sound level measurement system is hand-held or is otherwise monitored by a person located near its microphone, the holder must orient himself/herself relative to the highway in a manner consistent with the recommendation of the manufacturer of the sound level measurement system.
( 2 ) In no case shall the holder or observer be closer than 2 feet (.6 m) from the system's microphone, nor shall he/she locate himself/herself between the microphone and the vehicle being measured.
( c ) The microphone of the sound level measurement system shall be oriented toward the traveled lane of the highway at the microphone target point at an angle that is consistent with the recommendation of the system's manufacturer. If the manufacturer of the system does not recommend an angle of orientation for its microphone, the microphone shall be oriented toward the highway at an angle of not less than 70 degrees and not more than perpendicular to the horizontal plane of the traveled lane of the highway at the microphone target point.
( d ) The sound level measurement system shall be set to the A-weighting network and “fast” meter response mode.
[40 FR 42437, Sept. 12, 1975, as amended at 41 FR 10227, Mar. 10, 1976]
#### § 531.3 Applicability.

This part applies to manufacturers of passenger automobiles.
#### § 585.111 Scope.

This subpart establishes requirements for manufacturers of passenger cars, multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks, and buses with a gross vehicle weight rating of 2,722 kilograms (6,000 pounds) or less to submit a report, and maintain records related to the report, concerning the number of such vehicles that meet the requirements of Standard No. 216a; *Roof crush resistance; Upgraded standard* (49 CFR 571.216a).
1210-AB32-2-1484.html[7/26/2015 5:58:20 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwh-k28q

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1980

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Richard & Leonora Raggi

General Comment

I do not need the government to handle my retirement money. Get out of our pockets.
# Insurgent failures mark start of winter operations in eastern Afghanistan

/ Published Oct. 18, 2011

BAGRAM AIR FIELD, Afghanistan (October 16, 2011)  — Tactical mistakes by insurgents in eastern Afghanistan over the past weeks resulted in at least three failed attacks against Afghan and coalition targets.

“This is a direct demonstration of the increasing effectiveness of the Afghan security forces in eastern Afghanistan,” said Brig. Gen. Gary Volesky, deputy commanding general, Regional Command-East. “Frequently, the insurgents are coming up against a more professional and committed Afghan force.”

Afghan Uniformed Police prevented a complex attack against the municipal building in Gardez, Paktiya province, Oct.16. Insurgents again attempted to attack using a vehicle bomb and suicide vests. AUP officers shot and killed all three insurgents wearing suicide vests. The vehicle detonated, martyring one AUP officer and a municipal worker. 

On Oct. 15, Afghan security forces prevented a complex attack against a combined base in the Rukhah district, Panjshir province. 

Five insurgents were killed after they attacked the base with a vehicle bomb and suicide vests. Afghan security forces shot and killed four of the attackers, the fifth detonated his vehicle bomb with little effect against the base. 

Two Afghan civilians were martyred in the vehicle blast and two Afghan security guards were injured during the attack. 

Afghan and coalition forces killed 17 insurgents after a complex attack near the Nari district, Kunar province, Oct.14. Insurgents attacked with small arms and mortars. There were no reports of Afghan Army, coalition or civilian casualties

On Oct. 8, in the largest insurgent attack since 2009, Coalition aircraft and artillery fire, killed at least 25 insurgents who were attempting to penetrate Coalition bases in Paktika province. Insurgents unsuccessfully used indirect fire from multiple locations in Gormal, Sarobi and Barmal districts against Afghan and Coalition bases.

One Coalition member was slightly wounded during the attacks.

“Insurgent failures demonstrate an increase in the capability and capacity of our Afghan partners,” Volesky said.
#### § 577.9 Conformity to statutory requirements.

A notification that does not conform to the requirements of this part is a violation of the Act.