alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
l110mas E. Perez 

Secreraiy of Labor 

200 Constiwrion Ave. N\V 

Washington DC 20210 

Resource Strategies, Inc. J 

Tb(' pou:er of slmtegic t/Ji11ki11~- , i 

August 10, 2015 

Subject: Intervene on DOL Flduciary Rule and Advance Alternative 

Dear .Mr. Perez: 

As your constituent and a licensed financial and credentialed career professional "1th 33 years of experience 

helping small businesses and people, I am deeply concerned about the hannful impact the Department of Labor's 

fiduciary rule will have on my clients and retirement savers throughout the United States. I am requesting your 

immediate intervention, as the DOL continues to work on an accelerated timeline. 

fu a professional who has dedicated my career to providing my clients with retirement education, and helping 

th~~ grow their savings to achieve a secure retirement, I know this rule would be counterproductive tow,u-d that 

1111$SIOD. 

\'V'hile I believe all financial professionals should act in the best interests of their clients, the rule as proposed is 

not workable and \VOuld have numerous unintended coosequences (or perhaps imended) for Arneric<i.n workers 

and retirement savers, pa.iticulady those who are middle-class. The requirements in the rule \VOuld drive the 

market t0 fee- based arrangsments that are used only for wealthier clients and are not the best fit for many 

investors. As a result, middle-cfa.ss savers v.'ould be forced into lmv-service, do-it-yourself accounts - depriving 

them of meaningful, personalized planning advice. 

The rule would also reduce the availability of workplace retirement plans for small businesses and their 

employees, preventing workers from accessing help frorn1inancial professionals when leaving their jobs, and limit 

consumer choice regarding retirement products. 

Given the length, complexity and unworkable structure of this proposal, I believe any modifications to the rule 

will be insufficient to achieve the complete overhaul necessaiyto avoid serious ramifications for retirement 

savers. TI1e time to act is now before Americans are deprived of consumer choice on how to plan for retirement 

and invest their savings. 

i For these reasons, again, I urge you to intervene and a~ce a legislative alternative to ensure the DOL rule 

![ does not harm American savers. Thank you for your consideration. 

I 

:i Sincerely, 

·I 

:1 

:1 

:i ii 

it KML/dfw 1' 

ii 29425 Chagrin Boulevard Suite 100 Pepper Pike, OH 44122 p 216.765.0121 fZlD.378.5176 resourcesmnegies.com 

ii ij Fce-ha.~<:d Planning and Third l'arty Money Managc:mem offered through Resource Strat<:gic-, Inc., a State LiccnM~d lnvesrn1cn1 Advisor. 

I; Securities offered through ValMark Sccurilies, Inc. Mumbcr fINRA, SIPC. l30 Spring>idc Drive, Sulw ;;oo -Akron, Ohin 44333·243 J - J .80(}.765 5201 

Resource Smuegics, lflC. is a separate entity from ValMark Securities, !nc.
**Exhibit 31.3**
**CEO CERTIFICATION**
I, W. Douglas Parker, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of America WestAirlines, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b)  [intentionally omitted]  (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: April 26, 2005 /s/ W. Douglas Parker  W. Douglas Parker
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PRINCETON NATIONAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          22,703
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         346,091
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 3,700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    105,158
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          22,370
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            22,269
<LOANS>                                        285,351
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,880
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 462,493
<DEPOSITS>                                     384,302
<SHORT-TERM>                                    32,780
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,435
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,699
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,277
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 462,493
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 12,069
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,631
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   180
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                15,880
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,050
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,656
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,224
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      185
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  19
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,252
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,797
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,797
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,106
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.55
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.10
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,081
<LOANS-PAST>                                       166
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     68
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,880
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      259
<RECOVERIES>                                       154
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,880
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,880
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
December 31, 1995 financial statements and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000707606
<NAME> SYSTEMS & COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY CORP.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       8,641,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               75,388,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,010,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            92,934,000
<PP&E>                                      46,485,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              16,186,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             151,552,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       30,130,000
<BONDS>                                     31,690,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       152,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  87,874,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               151,552,000
<SALES>                                     47,683,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            47,819,000
<CGS>                                       30,925,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               43,403,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             543,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,873,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,610,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,263,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,263,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.

                1997 Trans Financial Leadership Incentive Plan
                                  Summary

Purpose
The Executive Incentive Plan rewards the Trans Financial  executives for leading
the company to the desired levels of success.  Success is  demonstrated  through
achievement of individual  and/or corporate goals. The corporate goal is made up
of two measures:  operating  efficiency  and earnings per share.  The individual
measures are based on net income or other bottom line contributions depending on
the executive's  area of control.  The rationale for the individual  measures is
that executives should be concerned with their individual area of responsibility
while continuing to contribute and focus on overall corporate goals.


Eligibility
Twenty-one  executives have currently been designated as eligible to participate
in this plan for 1997. New hires will receive a prorated  incentive based on the
month of hire.  Eligibility  is  contingent on a minimum  performance  rating of
excellent, and on active employment on the last day of the year.


Payment of Awards
Award amounts will be announced within 45 days after year end.  Awards will be 
paid in cash through the payroll system.


Payout Potential
There are three  award  levels  based on  performance  achieved.  The awards are
listed on an  attachment  to each  executive's  copy of this plan along with the
goals  and  measures  to be met at  each  level.  The  three  award  levels  are
threshold,  target, and maximum. Threshold is the lowest level of achievement at
which an incentive award will be paid.  Achievement between threshold and target
will  result  in a  payout  at the  threshold  level.  Target  is the  level  of
achievement  required for 100% payout of the incentive.  Target is the true goal
of this plan and is the budget. If performance is between target and the maximum
award  level,  a dollar  value  may will be  extrapolated  based on the level of
individual  and company  performance.  Maximum is the award that will be paid if
all measures are achieved at exceptional levels.


Corporate and Individual Measures
Each executive will have a set of measures inclusive of two corporate  measures.
The corporate  measures of earnings per share and average  operating  efficiency
for 1997 are set forth on the  individual  executive's  copy of the  plan.  Each
corporate measure will be considered separately and equally. If an executive has
individual  measures,  they  are  listed  on an  attachment  to  the  individual
executive's copy of the plan.


Disclaimer
The  Compensation  Committee of the Board of  Directors  must approve all awards
under this plan.  This plan is not a contract and may be modified or  terminated
at the Committee's discretion.
§ 368.4T Requirement to notify FMCSA of change in applicant information. ( a ) You must notify the FMCSA of any changes or corrections to the information in Parts I, IA or II submitted on the Form OP-2 or the Form BOC-3—Designation of Agents—Motor Carriers, Brokers and Freight Forwarders during the application process or while you have a Certificate of Registration. You must notify the FMCSA in writing within 45 days of the change or correction.
( b ) If you fail to comply with paragraph (a) of this section, the FMCSA may suspend or revoke the Certificate of Registration until you meet those requirements.
[82 FR 5303, Jan. 17, 2017]
#### The National City Bank v. The New York Gold Exchange Bank.

Motion to correct record granted.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1184.html[7/22/2015 3:27:03 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvd-gy6t

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1184

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Mike Hendricks

General Comment

I believe in personal freedom and responsibility and am totally opposed to this restrictive regulation, which

 amounts to legalized theft.
#### Annie L. Jackson, as Administratrix of the Estate of Robert Jackson, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*Margaret H. Greene et al., Appellants.

(Submitted April 24, 1911;

decided May 2, 1911.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 201 N. Y. 76.)
NORWEST FINANCIAL, INC.
                                       
              COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                       
                                 Exhibit (12)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                       Six
                      Months
                      Ended
                     June 30,
                       1997                   Years Ended December 31,

                                               (Thousands of Dollars)

                                1996      1995      1994      1993      1992
<S>                 <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Net earnings        $131,086  $276,331  $267,941  $223,340  $203,297  $164,204

Add:

    Fixed charges:

    Interest including
    amortization of
    debt expense     185,813   372,859   359,079   259,605   242,440   236,337

    One-third of
    rentals*           5,650    10,748    10,317     9,747    10,146     8,207

    Total fixed
    charges          191,463   383,607   369,396   269,352   252,586   244,544

    Provision for
    income taxes      70,531   148,096   147,873   116,900   104,228    84,334

Total net earnings,
  fixed charges and
  income taxes -
  "Earnings"        $393,080  $808,034  $785,210  $609,592  $560,111  $493,082

Ratio of earnings
  to fixed charges      2.05      2.11      2.13      2.26      2.22      2.02


</TABLE>
*One-third of rentals is deemed representative of the interest factor.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0689.html[7/21/2015 8:34:34 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-z2xb

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0689

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Ronald Ginochio

General Comment

No one manages their own affairs better than the individuals who bear the consequences of the management. In

 this regard, government is a horrible manager. Because it does not bear any consequences from its actions,

 government has no incentive to do a good job nor make decisions custom fit and appropriate for those for whom

 they are deciding. As a result, I propose that the ESBA leave the existing regulations governing individual

 retirement accounts intact and unchanged.
The Pacific Substance Abuse and Mental Health Initiative


Closing the Gap, Pacific Islander Health • June/July 2000 

The Pacific Substance Abuse and Mental Health Initiative (PSAMHI) is 

an ongoing collaboration between the six Pacific Island jurisdictions, a 

technical assistance team, and officials of Substance Abuse and Mental Health 

Services Administration (SAMHSA). 

The National Asian Pacific American Families Against Substance Abuse (NAPAFASA) 

and the Office of Minority Health (OMH) provide administrative assistance. “It is important that programs are in place before mental health and substance abuse problems 

become too big to adequately address,” said Ford Kuramoto, Executive Director of 

NAPAFASA. 

“Lifestyle changes are taking their toll on the peoples of the Pacific,” said Bruce 

Grant, SAMHSA project coordinator. “Consequently, we are seeing increasing substance 

abuse and mental health problems.” 

PSAMHI has three major goals: 

1.	 Establish a professional certification process; 

2.	 Prepare a cadre of substance abuse and mental health educators and trainers to meet 

community needs; and 

3.	 Provide a forum for collaboration and resource sharing among participating jurisdictions. 

The project has met most of its goals and its usefulness will extend beyond the life of 

the grant. The PSAMHI Collaborating Council, which has representatives from each 

participating government, will seek additional funding to expand its programs. The 

jurisdictions remain committed to funding staff to be part of the Council. 

SAMHSA is also involved in an extensive, Pacific wide research project with the 

University of Hawai‘i to study how changes in traditional lifestyles affect mental health 

and substance abuse in Pacific cultures. Five U.S.- Associated Pacific jurisdictions participate. 

Through these projects, SAMHSA, OMH, and NAPAFASA would like to ensure 

that the Pacific not only remains on the agenda, but that the islands have the capacity to 

develop and sustain programs of their own design, suitable for their cultures. 

For more information, call Dr. Grant at (301) 443-2387.

Office of Minority Health Resource Center	 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Bankshares, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of her knowledge:  1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Union Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by Union Bankshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   /s/ Marsha A. Mongeon Marsha A. Mongeon Chief Financial Officer  May 15, 2009
#### § 562.7 Lighting and marking requirements for new agricultural equipment.

New agricultural equipment that may be operated on a public road must meet the lighting and marking standards set forth in ANSI/ASAE 279.14 JUL2008, “Lighting and Marking of Agricultural Equipment on Highways” (incorporated by reference, see § 562.11).
#### Woodward S. Wixom, Respondent, v. George D. Uhl and another, Appellants

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the final award of costs Opinion by

Corlett, J.;

Haight, J., not voting.
#### The Tuscarora Land and Improvement Company Respondent, *v.*John C. Millar, Individually and as Executor of Polly J. Mentz, Deceased, et al., Appellants.

Reported below, 143 App. Div. 955.

(Argued April 24, 1911;

decided May 2, 1911.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 14,1911, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at an Equity Term in an action to enjoin the defendant from impeding and diverting the waters of a certain creek.

The motion was made upon the ground that the findings of fact had been unanimously affirmed by the Appel*538late Division; that the exceptions were frivolous, and that no question was presented that could be reviewed by the Court of Appeals.

*Martin Clark*for motion.

*August Becker*opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.