alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Motion to dismiss appeal allowed January 29, 1918.

#### HILL *v.*LEWIS.

(170 Pac. 316.)

Appeal and Error—Effect of Abandoning Appeal.

1. When a party perfects an appeal and then abandons it, his right of appeal is exhausted; the power over the subject is *functus officio,*and cannot be exereised the second time'.

From Josephine: Frank M. Calkins, Judge.

On motion of respondent to dismiss appeal.

Motion allowed.

*Messrs. Blmchard S Blanchard,*for the motion.

*Mr. Oliver 8. Brown, contra.*

In Banc.

Me. Justice Benson

delivered the opinion of the court.

1. Plaintiff moves to dismiss the appeal of the defendant Bose Cheshire for the following reasons: The decree of the trial court was made and entered on September 4, 1917. Thereafter, on September 7,1917, the defendant Bose Cheshire served and filed her notice of appeal and on September 17,1917, served and filed her undertaking on appeal. The appeal having been perfected, she neglected- to file a transcript within thirty days thereafter *240and subsequently on October 24,1917, filed a second notice of appeal which was followed on November 2,1917, with service and filing of a new undertaking and thereafter on December 7, 1917, a transcript on appeal was filed in this court. In *Schmeer*v. *Schmeer,*16 Or. 243 (17 Pac. 864), this court held that when a party perfects an appeal and then abandons it, his right of appeal is exhausted, the power over the subject is *functus officio,*and cannot be exercised the second time. This ruling has been many times reiterated, the latest case being that of *State*v. *Keeney,*81 Or. 478 (159 Pac. 1165). The appeal should be dismissed and it is so ordered.

Appeal Dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel, Institutional Training Grants (T32s).                     

*Date:*                         October 18, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 2 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Doubletree Hotel, Executive Meeting Center—Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Lorraine Gunzerath, PhD, MBA. Scientific Review Administrator, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse And Alcoholism, Office of Extramural Activities, Extramural Project Review Branch, 5635 Fishers Lane, Room 3043, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, 301-433-2369,                         *Igunzera@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS). 

Dated: September 7, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 07-4569  Filed 9-14-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
1210-AB32-2-1319.html[7/26/2015 1:24:19 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvw-ns6q

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1814

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Barbara Masi

Address:

5007 Village Green Way

Alpharetta, GA, 30009

Email: bmmjd333@bellsouth.net

Phone: 678-618-0897

General Comment

I am smart enough to plan my own retirement.
From: Laura Fogo [mailto:laura.fogo@transamerica.com] 

Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 12:35 PM

Subject: Advance an Alternative to the DOL Fiduciary Proposal

As your constituent and an employee of Transamerica, I am very much opposed to the proposed 

rule from the Department of Labor. I am asking for your immediate intervention as the DOL 

seems determined to move forward with the proposal, ignoring the clear adverse consequences 

its rule will have on our ability to provide our customers with access to a more secure retirement. 

Hardworking Americans� retirement futures are at risk. Financial professionals have an 

important part in helping American savers prepare for retirement, including providing their 

clients with educational resources and a broad range of products and services to help them grow 

and manage their savings to achieve a secure retirement. If the DOL�s rule is allowed to go into 

effect, it will: � Force middle-class savers into low-service, do-it-yourself accounts. � Deprive 

average savers of meaningful, personalized planning advice. � Limit the scope of products and 

services available for retirement planning. � Severely reduce the availability of workplace 

retirement plans for small-businesses. � Prevent workers from accessing help from financial 

professionals when leaving their jobs, especially regarding the ability to rollover funds into 

lifetime income guaranty solutions. � Block plan providers from effectively and efficiently 

providing guidance and education to participants regarding their investment and retirement 

planning options. For these reasons, again, I urge you to intervene and advance a legislative 

alternative to ensure the DOL rule does not harm American savers. Help us to create a Best 

Interest Standard that works in favor of every day Americans, not against them. I can also say 

from personal experience that the role of a strong financial advisor is critical. My mother was a 

Catholic school teacher for over 40 years. When she retired and needed to plan for her income, 

we relied heavily on a financial advisor for insight into her various accounts, guidance on how to 

assess options for annuities, and information for other alternatives. Even though I work for a 

financial services organization, I would not have been comfortable reviewing and evaluating her 

options, as I am not a financial professional. With a skilled and properly certified financial 

advisor, I am confident that my mom has the right plan in place for her personal needs. Thank 

you for your consideration. Sincerely, Laura Fogo Transamerica 7400 Abbott Grove Court 

Crestwood, KY 40014
<PAGE>
                                                      Exhibit (23)-1
                                                      Unicom Corporation
                                                      Form 10-K File No. 1-11375



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                   -----------------------------------------



     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in this Form 10-K of our report dated January 31, 1997 on Unicom
Corporation and subsidiary companies' consolidated financial statements as of
and for the year ended December 31, 1996 (Report), included in Unicom
Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 1997, to the
inclusion in this Form 10-K of our report dated January 31, 1997, on the
supplemental schedule of Unicom Corporation as of and for the year ended
December 31, 1996, and to the incorporation of such reports into Unicom
Corporation's previously filed prospectuses dated March 18, 1994, constituting
part of Form S-4 Registration Statement File No. 33-52109, as amended (relating
to Common Stock of Unicom Corporation), as further amended by Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 on Form S-8 (relating to Commonwealth Edison Company's Employee
Savings and Investment Plan) and Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 on Form S-8
(relating to Unicom Corporation's Employee Stock Purchase Plan), Form S-8
Registration Statement File No. 33-56991 (relating to Unicom Corporation's Long-
Term Incentive Plan), Form S-4 Registration Statement File No. 333-01003
(relating to the common stock of Unicom Corporation), Form S-8 Registration
Statement File No. 333-04749 (relating to Unicom Corporation's 1996 Directors'
Fee Plan) and Form S-8 Registration Statement File No.333-10613 (relating to
Commonwealth Edison Company's Employee Savings and Investment Plan). We also
consent to the application of our Report, incorporated by reference in this Form
10-K, to Commonwealth Edison Company and subsidiary companies' ratios of
earnings to fixed charges and the ratios of earnings to fixed charges and
preferred and preference stock dividend requirements for each of the years ended
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 appearing in Exhibit 99 of Unicom Corporation's
Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 1997.



                                         ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Chicago, Illinois
March 21, 1997
#### George E. Eastman, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Boardman, J.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPilot interaction with automated airborne decision making systemsWays in which computers can aid the decision making of an human operator of an aerospace system are investigated. The approach taken is to aid rather than replace the human operator, because operational experience has shown that humans can enhance the effectiveness of systems. As systems become more automated, the role of the operator has shifted to that of a manager and problem solver. This shift has created the research area of how to aid the human in this role. Published research in four areas is described. A discussion is presented of the DC-8 flight simulator at Georgia Tech.Document ID19900017176Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsHammer, John M.*(Georgia Inst. of Tech. Atlanta, GA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryMan/System Technology And Life SupportReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:186730NASA-CR-186730Accession Number90N26492Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG2-123Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900017176.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 94

To provide Capitol-flown flags to the families of deceased law enforcement

officers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Mr. GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide Capitol-flown flags to the families of deceased

law enforcement officers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Law Enforcement Offi5 cers Flag Memorial Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. CAPITOL-FLOWN FLAGS FOR FAMILIES OF DE7 CEASED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS.

8 (a) AUTHORITY.—

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—The family of a deceased law

10 enforcement officer may request, and the Attorney
2

•HR 94 IH

1 General shall provide to such family, a Capitol-flown

2 flag, which shall be supplied to the Attorney General

3 by the Architect of the Capitol. The family shall pay

4 the cost of such flag, including shipping.

5 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Paragraph (1) shall

6 take effect on the date on which the Attorney Gen7 eral establishes the procedure required by subsection

8 (b).

9 (b) PROCEDURE.—Not later than 180 days after the

10 date of enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall

11 establish a procedure (including any appropriate forms)

12 by which the family of a deceased law enforcement officer

13 may request, and provide sufficient information to deter14 mine such officer’s eligibility for, a Capitol-flown flag.

15 (c) APPLICABILITY.—This Act shall only apply to a

16 deceased law enforcement officer who died on or after the

17 date of enactment of this Act.

18 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act—

19 (1) the term ‘‘Capitol-flown flag’’ means a

20 United States flag flown over the United States

21 Capitol in honor of the deceased law enforcement of22 ficer for whom such flag is requested; and

23 (2) the term ‘‘deceased law enforcement officer’’

24 means a person who was charged with protecting

25 public safety, who was authorized to make arrests by
3

•HR 94 IH

1 a Federal, State, or local law enforcement agency,

2 and who died while employed by such an agency or

3 after retiring in good standing from such an agency.

Æ
#### § 29.406 Does the award of funds for a discretionary or competitive grant entitle a Tribe to receive the same amount in subsequent years?

The award of funds for a discretionary or competitive grant does not entitle a Tribe to receive the same amount of funds in subsequent years.
###### Editorial Note on Part 571

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 571 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 571.1 Scope.

This part contains the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards for motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment established under section 103 of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966 (80 Stat. 718).

[33 FR 19703, Dec. 25, 1968. Redesignated at 35 FR 5118, Mar. 26, 1970]
Editorial Note on Part 385
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 385.703 Safety monitoring system. ( a ) *General.* Each non-North America-domiciled carrier new entrant will be subject to an oversight program to monitor its compliance with applicable Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs), Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSSs), and Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMRs).
( b ) *Roadside monitoring.* Each non-North America-domiciled carrier new entrant will be subject to intensified monitoring through frequent roadside inspections.
( c ) *Safety decal.* Each non-North America-domiciled carrier must have on every commercial motor vehicle it operates in the United States a current decal attesting to a satisfactory North American Standard Commercial Vehicle inspection by a certified FMCSA or State inspector pursuant to 49 CFR 350.201(k). This requirement applies during the new entrant operating period and for three years after the carrier's registration becomes permanent following removal of its new entrant designation.
( d ) *Compliance review.* FMCSA will conduct a compliance review on a non-North America-domiciled carrier within 18 months after FMCSA issues the carrier a USDOT Number.
Exhibit
99.2



Statement of Chief Financial Officer

of

Berger Holdings, Ltd. (the Company)



I, Francis E. Wellock, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended Match 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the information contained in the Report presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   
|-------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2003
|
Ms. Lynne Liddington, 

Director 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 4 

ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 

61 FORSYTH STREET 

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 

APR 1 9 2016 

Knox County Department of Air Quality Management 

140 Dameron A venue 

Knoxville, Tennessee 37917 

Dear Ms. Liddington: 

Enclosed is the final end-of-year report for your agency's FY 2015 Air Pollution Control grant 

authorized by §105 of the Clean Air Act. This report outlines your agency's various grant commitments 

and their status. Since there were no issues and no adjustments necessary, your report is now fmalized. 

This letter documents the conclusion of the joint evaluation process required by 40 Code of Federal 

Regulations 35.115 and identified as a commitment in your FY 2015 Air Planning Agreement under 

Cross Cutting Issues. 

We appreciate the progress you made in FY 2015 and look forward to continuing our joint efforts to 

protect and improve air quality. If you have any questions regarding your grant, please contact Stuart 

Perry at ( 404) 562-8980 or Gwendolyn Graf at ( 404) 562-9289. 

Enclosure 

Carol L. Kernker 

Acting Director 

Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumer)
Order entered January 8, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01557-CV

CRAIG PATRICK POWER, Appellant

V.

BRADEN RICHARD POWER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-14415

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s January 7, 2021 second unopposed motion for 

extension of time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief 

be filed no later than February 12, 2021.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
From: Matthew Watts [mailto:Matthew.Watts@RaymondJames.com] 

Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 12:46 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

A Raymond James client who wished to remain anonymous, but was willing to share his success in using 

a variable annuity within his IRA:

The Financial Advisor recently advised the 73 year old client to annuitize his contract; the client will 

receive $53,710 annually for the rest of his life. That payment is guaranteed to him or his beneficiary 

over the next 10 years (e.g. if the client were to pass two years from now, his designated beneficiary 

would receive the annual payment for the following 8 years). When compared against the current total 

account value of $225,132, this payment represents a 24% guaranteed cash flow. 

The client purchased the annuity with $527,000 in 1998, and over time has withdrawn $460,000. If one 

combines the guaranteed 10 year annuity payment with the amount that the client has withdrawn in 

the past, the client will have received almost $1 million on the initial $527,000 purchase. If the client 

lives longer than the 10 year period, that amount continues to rise.

Matthew Watts

Vice President of Administration

Private Client Group Investment Products & Solutions

T 727-567-4054 // F 877-872-8932

880 Carillon Parkway, St. Petersburg, FL 33716

Private Client Group Investment Products & Solutions encompasses several Raymond James departments including the Alternative 

Investments Group, the Raymond James Insurance Group, the Options Department, and Mutual Fund Research and Marketing. An investor 

should carefully consider the merits and considerations of any product and thoroughly review the offering documents prior to making a 

purchase. Past performance is no assurance of future results. Information in this message reflects current market conditions and is subject to 

change without notice. It is believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness.

Please be advised that this message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have 

received this message in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this message, together with any copies, from your system. 

Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this message is strictly forbidden.