alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Docket: EBSA-2010-0050 

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’ 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0001 

Definition of the Term Fiduciary 

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0010 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-26236 

Submitter Information 

Name: Peter H. Briggs 

Address: 

306 E. Jefferson St. 

Charlottesville, 22902 

Email: pbriggs@shareholderstrategies.com 

Phone: 434-984-0474 

Organization: Shareholder Strategies, Inc. 

General Comment 

Shareholder Strategies, Inc. is the independent stock appraiser for approximately 45 ESOPs in the 

U.S. 

This proposed rule is likely to drive some of the best ESOP valuation firms out of the business (e.g. 

Duff & Phelps, HLHZ, Prairie Capital, Stout Risius Ross) and will consequently result in worse ESOP 

valuations. Being a fiduciary of only one retirement plan is a risky. Being a fiduciary of dozens (or 

hundreds) is an unthinkable risk for a company with substantive assets. Note that fiduciary liability 

insurance for appraisers is now unavailable for this very reason. They will underwrite the risk for one 

plan - not for dozens in all industries across the economy. 

The proposed rule will create confusion regarding the authority and decision-making process of the 

fiduciaries. Who is the boss? Who decides what? 

The new rule is the wrong way to make ESOP transactions cleaner and more thoughtful. Instead, 

you should DISALLOW EMPLOYEES TO SERVE AS A TRUSTEE. They are often unqualified to do so 

and often do not understand their risks and duties. It is not my job as the financial analyst to solve 

this. I am not a professional fiduciary. 

You should also require that the Trustees have their own independent legal counsel. They don't 

always have it and they should. 

I myself have considered whether to stay in the business. And ESOPs are mostly all I do. Why would 

I consider this? Because I am knowledgeable. The good firms may exit, leaving the worse, less well 

informed appraisers. 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION 

As of: January 07, 2011 

Received: January 04, 2011 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80bc5156 

Comments Due: January 20, 2011

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 2

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 1/7/2011
Page 2 of 2

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 1/7/2011
# Update on withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan July 5, 2021

/ Published July 6, 2021
Tampa, FL, 
July 6, 2021Release Number 20210706-01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASETAMPA, Fla. - U.S. Central Command provides the following update on the orderly and responsible withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan, as of 10 a.m. on July 5, 2021.Since the President's decision, the DoD has retrograded the equivalent of approximately 984 C-17 loads of material out of Afghanistan and have turned nearly 17,074 pieces of equipment to the Defense Logistics Agency for disposition. The 17,074 pieces of equipment comprise almost entirely federal excess personal property. Most of this equipment is not defensive articles or considered to be major equipment.Also, the U.S. has officially handed over seven facilities to the Afghan Ministry of Defense.The withdrawal process continues; U.S. Central Command estimates that we have completed more than 90% of the entire withdrawal process.NOTE: For operational security and to preserve force protection, we will not be updating the specific percentage of the exit process going forward.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information from Moto Photo Inc's
1997 Second Quarter 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such 10-Q filing.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,255,723
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,925,655
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,211,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,839,942
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,489,008
<PP&E>                                       3,058,769
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,764,790
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,818,196
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,679,152
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,000
<COMMON>                                        77,936
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,565,979
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,818,196
<SALES>                                     16,284,886
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,453,166
<CGS>                                        8,670,791
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,140,393
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,039,674
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               397,178
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             200,283
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                582,157
<INCOME-TAX>                                   180,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            401,657
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   401,657
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 572
Editorial Notes: 1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 572.132 Head assembly and test procedure. ( a ) The head assembly (refer to § 572.130(a)(1)(i)) for this test consists of the complete head (drawing 880105-100X), a six-axis neck transducer (drawing SA572-S11) or its structural replacement (drawing 78051-383X), and 3 accelerometers (drawing SA572-S4).
( b ) When the head assembly is dropped from a height of 376.0 ±1.0 mm (14.8 ±0.04 in) in accordance with subsection (c) of this section, the peak resultant acceleration at the location of the accelerometers at the head CG may not be less than 250 G or more than 300 G. The resultant acceleration vs. time history curve shall be unimodal; oscillations occurring after the main pulse must be less than 10 percent of the peak resultant acceleration. The lateral acceleration shall not exceed 15 G (zero to peak).
( c ) *Head test procedure.* The test procedure for the head is as follows: ( 1 ) Soak the head assembly in a controlled environment at any temperature between 18.9 and 25.6 °C (66 and 78 °F) and a relative humidity from 10 to 70 percent for at least four hours prior to a test.
( 2 ) Prior to the test, clean the impact surface of the skin and the impact plate surface with isopropyl alcohol, trichloroethane, or an equivalent. The skin of the head must be clean and dry for testing.
( 3 ) Suspend and orient the head assembly as shown in Figure 19 of 49 CFR 572. The lowest point on the forehead must be 376.0 ±1.0 mm (14.8 ±0.04 in) from the impact surface. The 1.57 mm (0.062 in) diameter holes located on either side of the dummy's head shall be used to ensure that the head is level with respect to the impact surface.
( 4 ) Drop the head assembly from the specified height by means that ensure a smooth, instant release onto a rigidly supported flat horizontal steel plate which is 50.8 mm (2.0 in) thick and 610 mm (24.0 in) square. The impact surface shall be clean, dry and have a micro finish of not less than 203.2. × 10−6 mm (8 micro inches) (RMS) and not more than 2032.0 × 10−6 mm (80 micro inches) (RMS).
( 5 ) Allow at least 2 hours between successive tests on the same head.
§ 570.58 Electric brake system. ( a ) *Electric brake system integrity.* The average brake amperage value shall be not more than 20 percent above, and not less than 30 percent below, the brake manufacturer's maximum current rating. In progressing from zero to maximum, the ammeter indication shall show no fluctuation evidencing a short circuit or other interruption of current. ( 1 ) *Inspection procedure.* Insert a low range (0 to 25 amperes for most 2- and 4-brake systems and 0 to 40 amperes for a 6-brake system) d.c. ammeter into the brake circuit between the controller and the brakes. With the controller in the “off” position, the ammeter should read zero. Gradually apply the controller to the “full on” position for a brief period (not to exceed 1 minute) and observe the maximum ammeter reading. Gradually return the controller to “full off” and observe return to zero amperes. Divide the maximum ammeter reading by the number of brakes and determine the brake amperage value.
( b ) *Electric brake wiring condition.* Electric brake wiring shall not be frayed. Wiring clips or brackets shall not be broken or missing. Terminal connections shall be clean. Conductor wire gauge shall not be below the brake manufacturer's minimum recommendation. ( 1 ) *Inspection procedure.* Examine visually for conditions specified.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 183 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 28, 2001.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2330) making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food 
and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies programs for the fiscal year 
ending September 30, 2002, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill 
shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill 
are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed 
one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall 
be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The amendment printed in 
the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be 
considered as adopted in the House and in the Committee of the Whole. Points of 
order against provisions in the bill, as amended, for failure to comply with 
clause 2 of rule XXI are waived. During consideration of the bill for further 
amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in 
recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused 
it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that 
purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as 
read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee 
shall rise and report the bill, as amended, to the House with such further 
amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered 
as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 272 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      November 1, 2001.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2311) making 
appropriations for energy and water development for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2002, and for other purposes. All points of order against the 
conference report and against its consideration are waived. The conference 
report shall be considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 393

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 393 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 393.3 Additional equipment and accessories.

The use of additional equipment or accessories in a manner that decreases the safety of operation of a commercial motor vehicle in interstate commerce is prohibited. Nothing contained in this subchapter shall be construed to prohibit the use of additional equipment and accessories, not inconsistent with or prohibited by this subchapter, provided such equipment and accessories do not decrease the safety of operation of the motor vehicles on which they are used.

[78 FR 58484, Sept. 24, 2013]
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                       TO
                                   FORM 10-QSB


[X] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 For the Quarterly period ended August 31, 1996

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT For the
transition period from _____ to _____


                         COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-11408
                              BIOSENSOR CORPORATION
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

            MINNESOTA                                   41-1427114
  (State or other jurisdiction             (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
of incorporation or organization)


      13755 First Avenue North,
         Plymouth, Minnesota                               55441
(Address of principal executive offices)                 (Zip Code)


Issuer's telephone number  (612) 449-9100


Check whether the Issuer: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the 12 months (or for such shorter period
that registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES __X__    NO ____

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's common stock, $.05 par
value, as of October 10, 1996 is 2,823,055.

This 10-QSB/A is being submitted to include the Financial Data Schedule omitted
from the initial filing.



                                   SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.


BIOSENSOR CORPORATION



B. Steven Springrose
President and Chief Executive Officer

Date  October ___, 1996
# 2016

# 2015

# 2014

# 2013

# 2012

# 2011

# 2010

# 2009

# 2008

# 2007

# 2006

# 2005

# 2004

# 2003

# 2002

# 2001

# 2000

# 1999

# 1998

# 1997

# 1996

# 1995

# 1994

# 1993

# 1992
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

_______________________

No. 07-13-00104-CR 

________________________

DAVID MAX ALLEN, APPELLANT 

 

v. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

On Appeal from the 242nd District Court 

Hale County, Texas 

Trial Court No. A19251-1209, Honorable Edward Self, Presiding 

 

June 4, 2013 

 

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. 

Appellant David Max Allen appeals from his conviction for driving while 

intoxicated. The district clerk has requested an extension of time to file the record, 

stating that appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the record. 

Appellant’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw the notice of appeal on April 25, 

2013, representing that appellant was requesting the appeal be dismissed. However, 

the motion was not signed by appellant, and counsel was directed to file a corrected 
2

motion with appellant’s signature. The latter is required by Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 42.2(a). To date, no corrected motion has been received by this court.

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 242nd District 

Court of Hale County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court 

shall determine the following:

1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; 

 2. whether appellant is indigent; and, if so,

3. whether appellant is entitled to a free record.

The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the 

aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a 

supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this court by July 3, 2013. 

Should further time be needed to perform these tasks, then same must be requested 

before July 3, 2013. Finally, the obligation of the court clerk and court reporter to file the 

appellate record is stayed until further notice. 

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
§ 545.6 Reporting requirements for vehicles listed in § 541.3(a)(1). ( a ) *General reporting requirements.* Within 60 days after the end of the production year ending August 31, 2007, each manufacturer shall submit a report to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration concerning its compliance with 49 CFR part 541 for vehicles listed in § 541.3(a)(1) that were manufactured between September 1, 2006 and August 31, 2007. Each report must— ( 1 ) Identify the manufacturer;
( 2 ) State the full name, title, and address of the official responsible for preparing the report;
( 3 ) Identify the production year being reported on;
( 4 ) Contain a statement regarding whether or not the manufacturer complied with the requirements of 49 CFR part 541 for the period covered by the report, and the basis for that statement;
( 5 ) Provide the information specified in paragraph (b) of this section;
( 6 ) Be written in the English language; and
( 7 ) Be submitted to: Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Room, 400 7th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590.
( b ) *Report content* — ( 1 ) *Basis for Statement of Compliance.* Each manufacturer shall provide the number of motor vehicles listed in § 541.3(a)(1) that were manufactured between September 1, 2006 and August 31, 2007 (excluding those motor vehicles that were subject to the requirements of 49 CFR part 541 before September 1, 2006).
( 2 ) *Production.* Each manufacturer shall provide (1) the number of motor vehicles manufactured between September 1, 2006 and August 31, 2007 (excluding those motor vehicles that were subject to the requirements of 49 CFR part 541 before September 1, 2006), that meet the requirements of 49 CFR 541.5; and (2) the number of motor vehicles manufactured between September 1, 2006 and August 31, 2007 (excluding those motor vehicles that were subject to the requirements of 49 CFR part 541 before September 1, 2006), that are exempt from 49 CFR part 541 pursuant to 49 CFR part 543.
( 3 ) *Statement regarding compliance.* Each manufacturer must provide a statement regarding whether or not the manufacturer complied with 49 CFR 541.5 requirements as applicable to the period covered by the report, and the basis for that statement.
[70 FR 28851, May 19, 2005, as amended at 72 FR 46176, Aug. 17, 2007]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1349.html[7/23/2015 6:10:02 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvi-vvp9

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1349

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Greg Hoffman

General Comment

Stay out of our hard earned retirement 401ks!!! We don't need ANY big bloated bankrupt bureaucratic money

 grubbing out of control Federal government Dept of Labor enacting ANY more burdensome regulatons to tell us

 how we can or should use our 401k funds!!! It's none if your damn business. You have bankrupted the nation,

 social security etc. and now you think you have the right to "dictate" or "control" our 401k retirement funds.

 Don't even think of it!!!
§ 511.75 Persons not attorneys. ( a ) Any person who is not an attorney at law may be admitted to appear in an adjudicative proceeding if that person files proof to the satisfaction of the Presiding Officer that he or she possesses the necessary legal, technical or other qualifications to render valuable service in the proceeding and is otherwise competent to advise and assist in the presentation of matters in the proceedings. An application by a person not an attorney at law to appear in a proceeding shall be submitted in writing to the Docket Section, not later than thirty (30) days prior to the hearing in the proceedings. The application shall set forth the applicant's qualifications to appear in the proceedings.
( b ) No person who is not an attorney at law and whose application has not been approved shall be permitted to appear in the Administration's proceedings. However, this provision shall not apply to any person who appears before the NHTSA on his or her own behalf or on behalf of any corporation, partnership, or association of which the person is a partner, officer, or regular employee.
[45 FR 81578, Dec. 11, 1980, as amended at 53 FR 15784, May 3, 1988]
Exhibit 99.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fisher Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I David D. Hillard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





| | (1) |  | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Dated: November 14, 2002





/s/    David D. HillardDavid D. Hillard Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/19/15 4:49 PM

Received: July 13, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jy4-o7cr

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2157

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: J M Siemering

General Comment

get out of my business - I can handle it myself