alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KENNETH GREGORY WILLIAMS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS; RICK COURSEY, 

Superintendent at Eastern Oregon 

Correctional Institution (EOCI); LEONARD 

WILLIAMSON, Inspector General at 

ODOC; MICHAEL F. GOWER, Assistant 

Administrator at ODOC; MICHAEL POPE, 

Correctional Officer at ODOC; DAVID 

POWELL, Disciplinary Hearings Officer at 

EOCI, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 19-35404 

D.C. No. 6:17-cv-01695-AA 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Ann L. Aiken, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2022**

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-35404 

Oregon state prisoner Kenneth Gregory Williams appeals pro se from the 

district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging due 

process and Eighth Amendment violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291. We review de novo. Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 

2004). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Williams’s due 

process claim because Williams failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as 

to whether the discipline imposed infringed on a protected liberty interest, or 

whether the discipline lacked any evidentiary basis. See Sandin v. Conner, 515 

U.S. 472, 483-85 (1995) (a prisoner has no federal or state protected liberty interest 

when the sanction imposed neither invariably extends the length of his sentence 

nor imposes an “atypical and significant hardship on the inmate in relation to the 

ordinary incidents of prison life”); Burnsworth v. Gunderson, 179 F.3d 771, 775 

(9th Cir. 1999) (no due process violation unless “a conviction was totally 

unsupported by evidence”).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Williams’s Eighth 

Amendment claim because Williams failed to raise a genuine dispute of material 

fact as to whether defendants’ conduct deprived him of “the minimal civilized 

measure of life’s necessities.” Lemire v. Cal. Dep’t of Corr. & Rehab., 726 F.3d 

1062, 1074 (9th Cir. 2013) (internal quotation marks omitted).
3 19-35404 

We reject as without merit Williams’s contentions that the discovery process 

was unfair.

AFFIRMED.
#### § 555.1 Scope.

This part establishes requirements for the temporary exemption by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of certain motor vehicles from compliance with one or more Federal motor vehicle safety standards in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 30113, and of certain passenger motor vehicles from compliance with all or part of a Federal bumper standard in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 32502.

[64 FR 2861, Jan. 19, 1999]
Exhibit 12-A


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

              CHRYSLER CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

              COMPUTATIONS OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


                                                       Year Ended December 31,
                                         1995      1994      1993      1992      1991
                                         ----      ----      ----      ----     ----
                                                       (Dollars in millions)
<S>                                     <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>

Net Earnings before cumulative
 effect of changes in accounting
 principles                             $  339     $  195     $  159     $  180     $  276
  
   Add back:
     Taxes on income                       183        120        108        115        126
     Fixed charges                         927        772        810      1,045      1,471
                                        ------     ------     ------     ------     ------
       Earnings available
        for fixed charges               $1,449     $1,087     $1,077     $1,340     $1,873
                                        ======     ======     ======     ======     ======
  Fixed charges:
     Interest expense                   $  910     $  754     $  791     $1,022     $1,446
     Rent                                   17         18         19         23         25
                                        ------     ------     ------     ------     ------
      Total fixed charges               $  927     $  772     $  810     $1,045     $1,471
                                        ======     ======     ======     ======     ======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges        1.56       1.41       1.33       1.28       1.27
                                        ======     ======     ======     ======     ======

</TABLE>


The ratios of earnings to fixed charges have been computed by dividing
earnings before income taxes and fixed charges by fixed charges. Fixed charges
consist of interest, amortization of debt discount and expense, and rentals.
Rentals included in fixed charges are the portion of total rent expense
representative of the interest factor (deemed to be one-third).
GREATER 

DurhamChamber 

I 7205 OFCOMMERCE Ju y 1 , l 

The Honorable Thomas E. Perez 

Secretary of Labor 

Department of labor 

200 Constitution Ave. NW 

Washington, D.C. 20210 

Dear Secretary Perez: 

300 V/esl Morgan Slreet, Suite 1400 • PO 6ox 3829 

Puthom, Nortll C<irolinil 27702 

919.32B.8700 

durha mch.amber.orq 

On behalf of the Greater Durham Chamber of Commerce and the nearly 1,000 member businesses, I write to note 

our concern with the Department of Labor (DoL)'s recent proposal to change the definition offidudary investment 

advice under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERlSA). Eighty six percent of our members are 

small businesses that may be utilizing these retirement products and would be directly impacted by the rule 

change. We encourage the DoL to make the appropriate changes to find a balanced approach where a rule can 

protect small businesses as well- as their access to retirement products and services. 

As with the Do L's original proposal in 2010, this rule would greatly expand the types of interactions with 

retirement savers that would be treated as investment advice. Given the extremely broad definition of investment 

advice and the possible impact on financial advisers operating under various compensation models, the Dol 

proposes a prohibited transaction exemption that provides relief to a financial services provider that agrees to act 

ln the best rnterest of its customer. However, the exemption does not apply to small businesses with partidpantdlrected plans. This means that small plan sponsors cannot look either to advisers or record-keepers for assistance 

in structuring fund line-ups. We are concerned thatthe current proposed rule will limit our small business 

members from receiving the help they need to establish and maintain a retirement plan. A vasf majority of small 

businesses will be at a disadvantage without the ability to offer employees a competitive retirement savings 

package. 

Consequently, we request that, prior to the publication of a final rule, the DoL work with representatives of the 

business and financial services communities to produce a workable rule that protects savers yet does not prevent 

our local businesses from continuing with their long-established service models that help our citiz.ens to plan and 

save for retirement. 

Thank you for your consideration of the Chambers concerns. If you have any questions regarding this letter please 

reach outto John White, the Chamber's Vice President of Public Policy, at 919-328-8724. 

Sincerely, 

' 

~~~~~ John D. White . 

Vice President of Public Policy 

cc: U.S. Senator Richard Burr 

U.S. Senator Thom Tillis 

U.S. Representative Virginia Fox-,; 

U.S. Representative Patrick McHenry 

u.s, Representative Robert Pittenger 

U.S. Representative GJC Butterfield 

U.S. Representative George Holding 

u 5. Representative David Price 

U.S. Represcmtative Mark Walker
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #18026 and #18027; VERMONT Disaster Number VT-00047]

# AGENCY:

Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 2.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Vermont (FEMA-4720-DR), dated 07/14/2023.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Flooding, Lanslides, and Mudslides.                    

*Incident Period:*                         07/07/2023 through 07/17/2023.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 08/15/2023.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         09/12/2023.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         04/15/2024.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Vermont, dated 07/14/2023, is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 07/07/2023 through 07/17/2023.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco Sánchez, Jr.,

Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.

[FR Doc. 2023-17930 Filed 8-18-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 28 (Monday, February 11, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9688-9689]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03032]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0539; FRL-9377-9]

Pesticides; Draft Guidance for Pesticide Registrants on 
Antimicrobial Pesticide Products With Mold-Related Label Claims; Notice 
of Availability; Extension of Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued a draft Pesticide Registration (PR) notice in the 
Federal Register issue of December 12, 2012, requesting comments on 
Guidance for Antimicrobial Pesticide Products with Mold-Related Label 
Claims. This document extends the comment period for 60 days, from 
February 11, 2013 to April 12, 2013.

DATES: Comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA-
HQ-OPP-2010-0539 must be received on or before April 12, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed instructions as provided under ADDRESSES 
in the Federal Register document of December 12, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melba S. Morrow, Antimicrobials 
Division (7510P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (703) 308-2716; email address: 
morrow.melba@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document extends the public comment 
period established in the Federal Register issue of December 12, 2012 
(77 FR 74003) (FRL-9362-3). In that document, EPA requested comment on 
a draft PR notice that provided guidance for antimicrobial pesticide 
products with mold-related claims. In response to comments from 
stakesholders requesting additional time to comment, EPA is hereby 
extending the comment period. The comment period, which was

[[Page 9689]]

set to end on February 11, 2013, is extended to April 12, 2013.
    To submit comments, or access the docket, please follow the 
detailed instructions as provided under ADDRESSES in the December 12, 
2012 Federal Register document. If you have questions, consult the 
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests.

    Dated: February 5, 2013.
Steven Bradbury,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2013-03032 Filed 2-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
1210-AB32-2-1072.html[7/24/2015 5:11:13 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-gfqk

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1566

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Deborah Catlett

General Comment

I have made my own money, I want to control my retirement money myself
1210-AB32-2-1416.html[7/26/2015 4:47:50 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jw5-ta9p

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1912

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: c. park

General Comment

Individual working U.S. citizens are capable of planning their own 401k and IRAs without the government

 taking control over it. Many have college degrees and are smart enough to set high earnings.
1210-AB32-2-1641.html[7/26/2015 9:30:28 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jy1-3tja

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2139

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

The Obamacare tax has distroyed our family. Now, it appears that the Obama Administration intends to distroy

 our retirement. WHEN WILL THE AMERICAN PEOPLE STOP THIS MASSIVE DISTRUCTION AND

 ATTACK BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ON OUR UNITED STATES OF AMERICA? Why is the

 American President attacking our Country??
From: Larry Hughna [mailto:sfs1@consolidated.net] 

Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 9:25 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: This new rule would give a manoply to the investment comunity that oposes annuity's. Would 

restrict available programs to the middle class wage earners and place thousands of honest insurance 

agents out of work!!!
§ 586.5 General requirements. ( a ) Each manufacturer wishing to register as a replica motor vehicle manufacturer must have a calendar year, worldwide production, including any by a parent or subsidiary of the manufacturer, of not more than 5,000 motor vehicles, and must not be a registered importer under 49 CFR part 592. Only one registration is permitted for manufacturers sharing common ownership. If a manufacturer wishes to manufacture replica motor vehicles and share common ownership with a registered replica motor vehicle manufacturer, it may only do so after the registered replica vehicle manufacturer submits an updated registration submission indicating that the exemption for 325 replica vehicles will be divided between the manufacturers. Replica manufacturers sharing common ownership will be limited to a total of 325 replica vehicles. An update to a registration to add a manufacturer under common ownership shall allocate the exemption for 325 replica vehicles between the manufacturers. An update to the registration to adjust the allocation must be made pursuant to § 586.9.
( b ) Each manufacturer wishing to manufacture replica motor vehicles under this program must be registered, according to the requirements in § 586.6, as a replica motor vehicle manufacturer for the calendar year in which the replica motor vehicle is manufactured.
( c ) Each replica motor vehicle manufacturer shall meet all statutory and regulatory requirements, including requirements in 49 CFR part 567, applicable to motor vehicle manufacturers, except: ( 1 ) 49 U.S.C. 30112(a) regarding the Federal motor vehicle safety standards applicable to vehicles (as opposed to standards applicable to motor vehicle equipment) in effect on the date of manufacture of the replica motor vehicle; and
( 2 ) 49 U.S.C. 32304, 32502, 32902 and 15 U.S.C. 1232.
( d ) Each replica motor vehicle manufacturer shall: ( 1 ) Meet all the requirements set forth in this part;
( 2 ) Not manufacture more than 325 replica motor vehicles in a calendar year; and,
( 3 ) Meet 49 U.S.C. 30112(a) regarding the Federal motor vehicle safety standards applicable to equipment items installed on the vehicle.
( e ) Each replica motor vehicle, as manufactured, shall resemble the original replicated vehicle.
( f ) An exemption granted by NHTSA may not be transferred to any other person, and shall expire at the end of the calendar year for which it was granted with respect to any volume authorized by the exemption that was not applied by the replica motor vehicle manufacturer to vehicles built during that calendar year.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

United States Commission on Civil Rights. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# Date and Time: 

Friday, September 21, 2007; 9:30 a.m. 

# Place: 

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Rm. 540, Washington, DC 20425. 

## Meeting Agenda 

I. Approval of Agenda. 

II. Approval of Minutes of August 24 Meeting. 

III. Program Planning. 
    - Record for Minority Children in State Foster Care and Adoption.
    - Briefing Book on Minority Children in State Foster Care and Adoption.

IV. Briefing on Minorities in Foster Care and Adoption. 
    - Introductory Remarks by Chairman.
    - Speakers’ Presentation.
    - Questions by Commissioners and Staff Director.

V. Adjourn. 

# Contact Person for Further Information: 

Manuel Alba, Press and Communications, (202) 376-8582. 

Dated: September 11, 2007. 

David Blackwood, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 07-4578 Filed 9-11-07; 3:51 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
§ 213.118 Continuous welded rail (CWR); plan review and approval. ( a ) Each track owner with track constructed of CWR shall have in effect and comply with a plan that contains written procedures which address: the installation, adjustment, maintenance, and inspection of CWR; inspection of CWR joints; and a training program for the application of those procedures.
( b ) The track owner shall file its CWR plan with the FRA Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety/Chief Safety Officer (Associate Administrator). Within 30 days of receipt of the submission, FRA will review the plan for compliance with this subpart. FRA will approve, disapprove or conditionally approve the submitted plan, and will provide written notice of its determination.
( c ) The track owner's existing plan shall remain in effect until the track owner's new plan is approved or conditionally approved and is effective pursuant to paragraph (d) of this section.
( d ) The track owner shall, upon receipt of FRA's approval or conditional approval, establish the plan's effective date. The track owner shall advise in writing FRA and all affected employees of the effective date.
( e ) FRA, for cause stated, may, subsequent to plan approval or conditional approval, require revisions to the plan to bring the plan into conformity with this subpart. Notice of a revision requirement shall be made in writing and specify the basis of FRA's requirement. The track owner may, within 30 days of the revision requirement, respond and provide written submissions in support of the original plan. FRA renders a final decision in writing. Not more than 30 days following any final decision requiring revisions to a CWR plan, the track owner shall amend the plan in accordance with FRA's decision and resubmit the conforming plan. The conforming plan becomes effective upon its submission to FRA.
[74 FR 43002, Aug. 25, 2009]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1373.html[7/23/2015 6:30:16 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvm-5d5c

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1373

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Kristie Huston

General Comment

I can control my own retirement