alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-----Original Message----- 

From: judyhb@triad.rr.com [mailto:judyhb@triad.rr.com] 

Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 1:43 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

May 02, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Judy Haughee-Bartlett 

3003 Eagle Nest Ct. 

Summerfield, NC 27358
#### Juliet C. BRYAN, Appellant, v. Chalmers F. GROFF, Appellee.

No. 14220.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued April 9, 1958.

Decided May 15, 1958.

*163Mr. H. Eugene Bryan, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Mr. N. Meyer Baker, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before Prettyman and Burger, Circuit Judges, and Madden, Judge, United States Court of Claims.1

1

. Sitting by designation pursuant to provisions of Sec. 291(a), Title 28, U.S.Code.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court. Appellant Bryan filed a civil action in that court against ap-pellee Groff “to reform note and other relief.” Groff filed a motion for summary judgment, and it was set for hearing. Counsel for Bryan was not present when the motion was called. The court granted the motion. A date, two days thereafter, was set fo;? the presentation of a formal order granting summary judgment. Counsel for Bryan was duly notified. Another attorney appeared and informed the court that Mr. Bryan was not then present because he was engaged in a case in Virginia, and that Mr. Bryan’s failure to appear at the hearing on the motion was due to his engagement in another court. The District Court entered judgment.

Although Mr. Bryan tells us that he informed the assignment commissioner of his conflicting engagements, he at no time took steps to inform the court or the clerk of the court. We find no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court.2

Affirmed.

2

. Rule 9(d) of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia reads as follows: “If at the time set for hearing there be no appearance for the moving party the court may treat the motion as submitted or waived, or continue or strike it from the motion calendar. If there be no appearance for the opposing side, it may be treated as conceded.”
###### Editorial Note on Part 389

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 389 appear at 66 FR 49873, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 389.29 Adoption of final rules.

Final rules are prepared by representatives from all relevant offices of FMCSA. The final rule is then submitted to the Administrator for his/her consideration and forwarded, as necessary, to the Office of the Secretary for review and approval. Once approved by the Office of the Secretary, and, if necessary, by the Office of Management and Budget's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, the final rule is signed by the Administrator. All final rules must be published in the Federal Register, unless all persons subject to the final rule are named and personally served with a copy of it.

[85 FR 86849, Dec. 31, 2020]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDesign trends for Army/Air Force airplanes in the United StatesSome design trends in Army/Air Force airplane systems in the U.S. are traced from the pre-World War 2 era to the present time. Various types of aircraft systems are reviewed with a view toward noting design features that were used. Some observations concerning the design trends indicate that some may be driven by advanced technology and some by a need for new mission requirements. In addition, it is noted that some design trends are evolutionary and result in an extension of service life or utility of existing systems. In other cases the design trends may be more revolutionary with the intent of creating a system with a new capability. Some examples are included of designs that did not proceed to production for reasons that sometimes were technical and sometimes were not.Document ID19900014022Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSpearman, M. Leroy*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1990Subject CategoryGeneralReport/Patent NumberL-16636NASA-TM-4179NAS 1.15:4179Accession Number90N23338Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-69-41-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900014022.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Office of Regulations and Interpretations Office of Exemption Determinations

Employee Benefits Security Administration Employee Benefits Security Administration
Attn: Conflict of Interest Rule, Room N-5655 Attn: D11712 and D-11713

U.S. Department of Labor U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue N.W. 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20210 Washington, D.C. 20210

RE: Proposed Conflict of Interest Rule and Related Proposals, RIN 1210-AB32 and
ZRIN: 1210-ZA25

September 2, 2015

| disagree with the proposed changes that will eliminate the use of options in an IRA.

As a CPA have clients who are looking to lessen the risks of a market downturn. Instead of selling the
stock, they find it more prudent to place a put option that in effect neutralizes their potential loss. That
is just one example of how options protect the investor.

Jam by no means directly comparing these proposed actions by your organizations, with China’s efforts
to prop up their financial markets, but please think through what is currently occurring to investors in
that country. The Chinese government has stated that they will punish anyone who attempts to profit
from a decline in stock prices through shorting. Options are a main tool to either go long or go short.

There is a classic lesson from history that involved Joseph Kennedy back when the 1929 market crash
occurred. He was having his shoes shined and heard the shiners remark how much money they were
making in the market. Without us passing a moral judgment on his reasoning, but, rather learning from
it, it is said that Kennedy had a revelation. He figured that if these boys were pouring funds into the
market than there was a bubble and he promptly shorted the market. From that the Kennedy fortune
was made.

\ do believe that there is another side to issues such as this. Please accept my comments as a modest
attempt to show that there are serious repercussions to attempts to “protect” our country’s citizens
from themselves.

Respectfully,

Richard Lamm
1605 Woodside Dr. Freeport, Illinois 61032
from: Jim Christian L'-'-'="-''=-'~·'·''-''..CJ.'"'··"°''·'·'~~-'-"·"·=J Sent: 

To: Talk to DOL 

Cc: 

\\ants or 

i<m est cost or buy 

h:cs to an 

management l or hourly arc Lhc clicnr s ) chokes frir 

adi. isPrs or those compensation options along with thcir costs and bcnclits is the client's best 

inh:n:st. Who is the DOL to l'ffcctively decidt> hon· dicnts should pay for their financial planning 

scrYkt•s'? 

The 111clbod \11' compensation ( .:ommission. advisory, or hourly) provides the dicnt choic..:s for compensation to 

lhci r a1.h isur that best !ils thci r personal needs and pn.:li.:rcm:cs so clients arc well-served in ul I 5 an.: us, nol j list 

im .. :stmi.:nt . Ask: r this -Arc )'OU ,,·ming to spend more on a product or service if you 

recchc greater value when you rccche full disclosure and knowledge of the costs benefits of the more 

cxp(~nsh c option'? yes, n h~ then'' 01.dd a blanket rule on cost product in 

interest'.> 

ll1 i.:n:ry and cases or 

become call that cn:ry in manner arc 

cs tu bl ishcd fur the lmvcst common denominator. That is simply not the case. Consideration should be to 
the vast majority of advisors providing client centered value/service with full disclosure rather than the smaller 

number of bad apples. 

lf the DOL stays myopic on fees alone and loses sight of the bigger 5-part comprehensive financial planning 

picture it could easily cause "harm to clients" by taking away their decision making right and 1

'harm to the 

taxpayer" by unforeseen increased costs in social welfare benefits by exacerbating insufficient comprehensive 

fmancial/retirement planning and saving by advisors and consumers. 

Giving consideration, control and decision making to the consumer to make informed choices armed with full 

disclosure for the value they desire is in the best interest of all stakeholders. 

Respectfully, 

James M. Christian CLU, ChFC 

17595 Kenwood Trail Suite 170 

Lakeville, MN 55044 

Wk (952) 898-3060 Fax (952) 898-2458 

Toll Free (877) 898-3060 

iim@jcretire.com 

www.jcretire.com 

f .. ~· ·' ·: ••• , ",, •• , ....... ·'-l' 

2014-2015 National President 

The society is a network of select 

credentialed members working in 

diverse financial disciplines- bound 

together to pursue knowledge, uphold 

the highest ethical standards and 

form meaningful relationships for 

the benefit of our clients. 

Lakeville Rotary 

Securities and investment advisory services offered through FSC Securities Corpora1'on, member FINRA/SIPC. Insurance services 

offered through Jim Christian Inc. and not affiliated with FSC Securities Corporation. 

This message and any attachments contain information, which may be confidential and/or privileged, and is intended for use only by the 

intended recipient. any review; copying. distribution or use of this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission 

in error, please (i) notify the sender immediately and (ii) destroy all copies of this message. 

2
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0751.html[7/21/2015 11:31:30 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-tyh0

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0751

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: John Veltre

General Comment

I do not want under-achievers getting any of my retirement money. This is another ploy by our piece of 

 President, Obama, to up our lives. When will this piece of president leave us alone.
#### § 29.902 Does the Equal Access to Justice Act apply to the Program?

The Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 5 U.S.C. 504 and 28 U.S.C. 2414, and the relevant implementing regulations (48 CFR 6101.30 and 6101.31; 49 CFR part 6) will apply if the Tribe's compact or funding agreement make these provisions applicable.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, August 2, 1995 (107), Para 107.15 Recorded Vote]
[Pages 1241-1242]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.107.15  recorded vote

  A recorded vote by electronic device was ordered in the Committee of 
the Whole on the following amendments en bloc submitted by Ms. PELOSI:

[[Page 1242]]

       Amendment No. 60: Page 20, strike lines 15 through 22 
     (relating to OSHA ergonomic protection standards).
       Amendment No. 61: Page 58, line 20, strike the colon and 
     all that follows through ``Act'' on page 59, line 8 (relating 
     to NLRB and salting).
       Amendment No. 62: Page 59, line 8, strike the colon and all 
     that follows through ``evidence'' on page 60, line 8 
     (relating to NLRB section 10(j) authority). 

It was decided in the

Yeas

197

negative

Nays

229
```
§ 543.7 Petitions based on performance criteria. A petition submitted under this section must include: ( a ) A statement that the entire line of vehicles is equipped with an immobilizer, as standard equipment, that meets one of the following: ( 1 ) The performance criteria (subsections 8 through 21) of C.R.C, c. 1038.114, *Theft Protection and Rollaway Prevention (in effect March 30, 2011),* as excerpted in appendix A of this part;
( 2 ) National Standard of Canada CAN/ULC-S338-98, *Automobile Theft Deterrent Equipment and Systems: Electronic Immobilization* (May 1998);
( 3 ) United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN/ECE) Regulation No. 97 (ECE R97), *Uniform Provisions Concerning Approval of Vehicle Alarm System (VAS) and Motor Vehicles with Regard to Their Alarm System (AS)* in effect August 8, 2007; or
( 4 ) UN/ECE Regulation No. 116 (ECE R116), *Uniform Technical Prescriptions Concerning the Protection of Motor Vehicles Against Unauthorized Use* in effect on February 10, 2009.
( b ) Compliance documentation kept to demonstrate the basis for certification with the performance criteria specified in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) A statement that the immobilizer device is durable and reliable.
[81 FR 66841, Sept. 29, 2016]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Economics and Statistics Administration

# SUMMARY:

Below is a listing of individuals who are eligible to serve on the Performance Review Board in accordance with the Economics and Statistics Administration's Senior Executive Service and Senior Professional Performance Management Systems:

Preston Jay Waite, Shirin A. Ahmed, Teresa Angueira, William G. Bostic, Jr., Stephanie Brown, Nancy M. Gordon, Arnold A. Jackson, Theodore A. Johnson, Ruth Ann Killion, Robert LaMacchia, and Michael J. Longini.

Thomas L. Mesenbourg, Jr., Brian Monaghan, C. Harvey Monk, Andrew H. Moxam, Walter C. Odom, Jr., Richard W. Swartz, Mark Wallace, Daniel Winberg, Tommy Wright, and William Bell.

Robert E. Fay III, David F. Findley, Paul Friday, J. Steven Landfeld, Rosemary D. Marcuss, Dennis J. Fixler, Brent R. Moulton, Sumiye O. Okubo, Joel Platt, James K. White, Dr. Jennifer Madans, and Katherine Wallman.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Crystal Roy, 301-763-3727.

Dated: September 4, 2007.

James K. White,

Associate Under Secretary for Management, Chair, Performance Review Board.

[FR Doc. 07-4556  Filed 9-13-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-BS-M
H. Res. 178

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 26, 2001.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2299) making appropriations for the Department of Transportation and related agencies for the fiscal

year ending September 30, 2002, and for other purposes. The

first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of

order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one

hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall be considered for

amendment under the five-minute rule. Points of order

against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause

2 of rule XXI are waived except as follows: beginning with

‘‘for administration’’ on page 13, line 24, through ‘‘section

40117;’’ on line 25; beginning with ‘‘Provided’’ on page 14,
2

•HRES 178 EH

line 12, through line 20; beginning with ‘‘Provided,’’ on page

15, line 9, through line 14; beginning with ‘‘Provided’’ on

page 23, line 20, through page 24, line 2; ‘‘notwithstanding

any other provision of law’’ on page 26, line 10; beginning

with ‘‘together with’’ on page 26, line 15, through the closing

quotation mark on line 16; page 31, line 9 through ‘‘as

amended,’’ on line 10; page 38, line 23, through page 45, line

2; page 50, line 22, through page 51, line 15; page 55, line

6, through line 13; page 56, line 16, through page 57, line

2. Where points of order are waived against part of a paragraph, points of order against a provision in another part of

such paragraph may be made only against such provision and

not against the entire paragraph. During consideration of the

bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the

Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of

whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to

be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such

amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amend-
3

•HRES 178 EH

ments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
-----Original Message----- 

From: howednan2@att.net [mailto:howednan2@att.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 11:38 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

May 04, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Nancy & Ed Howard 

1016 Stanton Place 

Modesto, CA 95355
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RegeneRx (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, C. Neil Lyons, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
presented in this report.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 15, 2007



/s/ C. Neil LyonsC. Neil LyonsChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                            1778
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        8
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1788
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1788
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               86
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1702
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1788
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    22
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    43
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (21)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (21)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (21)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)
        

</TABLE>