alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1069.html[7/22/2015 7:28:32 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-wd19

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1069

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Charles Holstein

General Comment

I don't need any washington bureaucrats telling me how to save for my retirement! Big government equals big

 problems. Stop being part of the problem and become the solution!
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1285.html[7/22/2015 9:54:18 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jve-zqf2

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1285

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Patti Anonymous

General Comment

To the Dept of Labor and all those concerned regarding MY retirement:

KEEP YOUR HANDS AND BUSINESS OUT OF MY PERSONAL BUSINESS AND HARD WORKING

 EARNED MONEY!

I do not need government nannies to take care of how I choose to handle my own retirement. Government needs

 to mind the business of defending and protecting Americans and let the people of this country run their own

 lives. I am old enough and capable enough to make my own decisions and I don't need your help running my

 own personal life. I am beyond frustrated of how progressives think they need to interfere in every area of an

 individual's personal life. I love my country and those that sacrifice to defend her. I am thankful for government,

 but limited government! I think I got my message across, so I hope you are listening and adhering to the voices

 of those who feel like I do. YOU were elected to REPRESENT the people NOT overtake the country!!!
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/19/15 12:02 PM

Received: July 14, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jz4-skeb

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2242

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Mark Miller

Address: 

914 Porter Ave

Eau Claire, WI, 54701

Email: mark@completeinsuranceofeauclaire.com

Phone: 715-456-8293

General Comment

Having participated in several summary meetings on this proposed regulation I have come to the 

conclusion that this rule will 

have a significant adverse effect on my health insurance clients. It is my understanding that I am 

subject to being considered 

a "Fiduciary" when I explain the benefits of how HSAs work with certain health plans. I 

regularly encourage people to look at 

that particular option due to the favorable cost element. The HSA part of the tool (which I have 

nothing to do with from an 

administration or compensation side) is important because it allows folks to save money in the 

event that they need to use their 

health providers and they need money to pay their bills and minimize the impact on their 

budgets. To have them have to sign 

contracts to allow me to discuss that issue is not helpful. It creates confusion and unneeded 
paperwork for a non-issue. I have

already had existing clients tell me that they would not sign additional paperwork in order for me 

to advise them on health 

insurance options. While I don't do security related advise, I know that many of the folks that 

work with small IRAs and whatnot

are going to have a similar issue, but that's someone else's story. I hope that as this comment 

period ends and you carefully 

consider the rule in practice, you will make major changes in scope and make them consistent 

with the other standards already 

in place.

Respectfully,

Mark A. Miller
#### In the Matter of the Attorney General *v.*The New York State Life Insurance Company. Pearson *v.*Stafford. Smyth *v.*Bancroft.—

The papers not being in compliance with the requirements of the statutes, the application cannot be entertained. The papers may be withdrawn and leave given to submit another application through the receiver as required by the act.
###### Editorial Note on Part 398

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 398 appear at 66 FR 49875, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 398.7 Inspection and maintenance of motor vehicles.

Every motor carrier shall systematically inspect and maintain or cause to be systematically maintained, all motor vehicles and their accessories subject to its control, to ensure that such motor vehicles and accessories are in safe and proper operating condition.

[33 FR 19765, Dec. 25, 1968, as amended at 86 FR 57077, Oct. 14, 2021]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Monongahela National Forest, USDA Forest Service.

# ACTION:

Notice of new fee site. 

# SUMMARY:

The Monongahela National Forest is planning to charge a $5.00 fee for overnight camping at the numbered campsites located along the Williams and Cranberry Rivers. These campsites are located on the Gauley and Marlinton Ranger Districts. These campsites include the basic amenities found in rustic Forest Service campgrounds. These campsites have been in use for many years, and were previously free-of-charge. Fee collections will be used to maintain and operate these campsites.

# DATES:

The proposed fee will be established in April of 2008.

# ADDRESSES:

Forest Supervisor, Monongahela National Forest, 200 Sycamore Street, Elkins, West Virginia, 26241.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Tim Henry, Recreation Forester, 304-799-4334.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Federal Recreation Lands Enhancement Act (Title VII, P.L. 108-447) directed the Secretary of Agriculture to publish a six month advance notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     whenever new recreation fee areas are established. This new fee will be reviewed by a Recreation Resource Advisory Committee prior to a final decision and implementation.                

Public notification has been conducted on-site and in the local region. Comments received have been supportive of this proposal. People using these campsites desire to see the sites well maintained and available for recreational use. a market analysis indicates that the $5/per night fee is both reasonable and acceptable for this sort of recreation experience.

Dated: August 20, 2007.

Clyde Thompson, 

Monongahela National Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 07-4580 Filed 9-14-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### William J. Johnson, *Commissioner, etc., Respondent, v.*John Loveless, *Appellant.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.
§ 237.33 Content of bridge management programs. Each bridge management program adopted in compliance with this part shall include, as a minimum, the following: ( a ) An accurate inventory of railroad bridges, which shall include a unique identifier for each bridge, its location, configuration, type of construction, number of spans, span lengths, and all other information necessary to provide for the management of bridge safety;
( b ) A record of the safe load capacity of each bridge;
( c ) A provision to obtain and maintain the design documents of each bridge if available, and to document all repairs, modifications, and inspections of each bridge; and
( d ) A bridge inspection program covering as a minimum: ( 1 ) Inspection personnel safety considerations;
( 2 ) Types of inspection including required detail;
( 3 ) Definitions of defect levels along with associated condition codes if condition codes are used;
( 4 ) The method of documenting inspections including standard forms or formats;
( 5 ) Structure type and component nomenclature; and
( 6 ) Numbering or identification protocol for substructure units, spans, and individual components.
#### Olney L. Carpenter, Respondent, v. The Boston and Albany Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costó. Opinion by Landon, J.; Learned, P. J., not acting.
<PAGE>
                                 EXHIBIT 99 (D)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



      In connection with the Annual Report of Coastal Caribbean Oils & Minerals,
Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Phillip W. Ware, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 oF the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

Date:  March 13, 2003                     By /s/ Phillip W. Ware
                                          ----------------------
                                            Phillip W. Ware
                                            President
```

[109th Congress Public Law 96]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ096.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 2119]]

Public Law 109-96
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to provide for the 
   regulation of all contact lenses as medical devices, and for other 
              purposes. <<NOTE: Nov. 9, 2005 -  [S. 172]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REGULATION OF CERTAIN ARTICLES AS MEDICAL DEVICES.

    Section 520 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 
360j) is amended by adding at the end the following subsection:

                 ``Regulation of Contact Lens as Devices

    ``(n)(1) All contact lenses shall be deemed to be devices under 
section 201(h).
    ``(2) Paragraph (1) shall not be construed as bearing on or being 
relevant to the question of whether any product other than a contact 
lens is a device as defined by section 201(h) or a drug as defined by 
section 201(g).''.

    Approved November 9, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 172:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

SENATE REPORTS: No. 109-110 (Comm. on Health, Education, Labor, and 
Pensions).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            July 29, considered and passed Senate.
            Oct. 26, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE INTERIM
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          42,308
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,184
<PP&E>                                          40,332
<DEPRECIATION>                                (39,197)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  77,516
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,400,851
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    35,997,266
<OTHER-SE>                                (38,300,601)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    77,516
<SALES>                                          2,515
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,515
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  209,376
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     6
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,819
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (244,674)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (244,674)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>LOSS PER SHARE ON A FULLY DILUTED BASIS NOT CALCULATED SINCE THE EFFECT IS
ANTIDILUTIVE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       4,108,000
<SECURITIES>                                 4,898,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,580,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   114,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,379,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,998,000
<PP&E>                                       5,380,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,444,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,934,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,524,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,115,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,400,000
<SALES>                                     21,687,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,687,000
<CGS>                                       10,455,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,236,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,714,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,792,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,922,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,922,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 24-12

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOWN
ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, John W. Rogers, Jr., do hereby appoint John W. Rowe and Randall E. Mehrberg, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to
sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2002 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.

|                     |  |                                          
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|                     |  | /s/JOHN W. ROGERS, JR.John W. Rogers, Jr.
|                     |  |                                          
|DATE: March 20, 2003 |  |                                          

---

QuickLinks
Sent: Monday, September 07, 2015 4:04 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

I would like to encourage the implementation of the fiduciary rule proposed. I base this entirely 

on an article dated 9-7-15 in the Oregonian titled Advisers should play by same rules. It has 

become increasingly difficult to place trust in anything these days but when it comes to 

retirement funds it's important that terms and all information are made crystal clear to the 

investor. I would think it would also be important to government officials as well, not only for 

their own good but because those who run out of money will look to the government for help.

Please critically review this legislation with an eye to benifit the investor. Reviewing other states 

requirements might be beneficial.

Sincerely,

Leslie M
§ 375.807 What actions may I take to collect the charges upon my invoice? ( a ) You must present an invoice within 15 days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays) of the date of delivery of a shipment at its destination.
( b ) The credit period must be seven days (including Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays).
( c ) You must provide in your tariffs the following four things: ( 1 ) You must automatically extend the credit period to a total of 30 calendar days for any shipper who has not paid your invoice within the 7-day period. However, for charges for impracticable operations that are not collected at delivery, you may not extend the credit period beyond 30 days after you present your invoice.
( 2 ) You will assess a service charge to each individual shipper equal to one percent of the amount of the invoice, subject to a $20 minimum charge, for the extension of the credit period. You will assess the service charge for each 30-day extension the charges go unpaid.
( 3 ) You must deny credit to any shipper who fails to pay a duly-presented invoice within the 30-day period. You may grant credit to the individual shipper when the individual shipper satisfies he/she will promptly pay all future invoices duly presented.
( 4 ) You must ensure all payments of invoices are strictly in accordance with the rules and regulations of this part for the settlement of your rates and charges.
[68 FR 35091, June 11, 2003, as amended at 72 FR 36775, July 5, 2007; 87 FR 24448, Apr. 26, 2022]
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 31, 1995 (137), Para 137.18 Message from the President--National Emergency with Respect to Iran]
[Pages 1810-1811]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.137.18  message from the president--national emergency with respect 
          to iran

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. COMBEST, laid before the House a message 
from the President, which was read as follows:

To the Congress of the United States:
  Section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)) 
provides for the automatic termination of a national emergency unless, 
prior to the anniversary date of its declaration, the President 
publishes in the Federal Register and transmits to the Congress a notice 
stating that the emergency is to continue in effect beyond the 
anniversary date. In accordance with this provision, I have sent the 
enclosed notice, stating that the Iran emergency is to continue in 
effect beyond November 14,

[[Page 1811]]

1995, to the Federal Register for publication. Similar notices have been 
sent annually to the Congress and the Federal Register since November 
12, 1980. The most recent notice appeared in the Federal Register on 
November 1, 1994.
  The crisis between the United States and Iran that began in 1979 has 
not been fully resolved. The international tribunal established to 
adjudicate claims of the United States and U.S. nationals against Iran 
and of the Iranian government and Iranian nationals against the United 
States continues to function, and normalization of commercial and 
diplomatic relations between the United States and Iran has not been 
achieved. Indeed, on March 15 of this year, I declared a separate 
national emergency with respect to Iran pursuant to the International 
Emergency Economic Powers Act and imposed separate sanctions. By 
Executive Order 12959, these sanctions were significantly augmented. In 
these circumstances, I have determined that it is necessary to maintain 
in force the broad authorities that are in place by virtue of the 
November 14, 1979, declaration of emergency, including the authority to 
block certain property of the Government of Iran, and which are needed 
in the process of implementing the January 1981 agreements with Iran.

                                                   William J. Clinton.  
  The White House, October 31, 1995.

  By unanimous consent, the message, together with the accompanying 
papers, was referred to the Committee on International Relations and 
ordered to be printed (H. Doc. 104-130).
```