alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

House Calendar No. 39

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 161

[Report No. 107–97]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1088) to amend the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 to reduce fees collected by the Securities and

Exchange Commission, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 12, 2001

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1088) to amend

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to reduce fees collected by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and

for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of

3 order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1088) to

4 amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to reduce fees

5 collected by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and

6 for other purposes. The bill shall be considered as read
2

HRES 161 RH

1 for amendment. In lieu of the amendment recommended

2 by the Committee on Financial Services now printed in

3 the bill, the amendment in the nature of a substitute print4 ed in the Congressional Record and numbered 1 pursuant

5 to clause 8 of rule XVIII shall be considered as adopted.

6 The previous question shall be considered as ordered on

7 the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment

8 thereto to final passage without intervening motion except:

9 (1) one hour of debate on the bill, as amended, equally

10 divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking mi11 nority member of the Committee on Financial Services;

12 (2) the further amendment printed in the Congressional

13 Record and numbered 2 pursuant to clause 8 of rule

14 XVIII, if offered by Representative LaFalce of New York

15 or his designee, which shall be in order without interven16 tion of any point of order, shall be considered as read,

17 and shall be separately debatable for one hour equally di18 vided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent;

19 and (3) one motion to recommit with or without instruc20 tions.

House Calendar No. 39

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 161

[Report No. 107–97]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1088)

to amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 toreduce fees collected by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and for other purposes.

JUNE 12, 2001

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12** 
**- 6206** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
WILLIE WOODLAND, JR. ,
Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Wheeling

. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 5:08

- cr
- 00003

- FPS

- 1 )

Submitted : June 22, 2012 Decided: July 16, 2012

Before KING, SHEDD, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Willie Woodland, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Castle Parr, Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , Wheeling, W est Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Willie Woodland, Jr. ap peals the district court ’ s

order denying his motion for reduction of sentence . We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Woodland , No. 5:08

- cr
- 00003

- FP S

- 1 (N.D. W. Va.

Jan. 17, 2012) ; see United States v. Brown , 653 F.3d 337 (4th
Cir. 2011), cert. denied , 132 S. Ct. 1003 (2012). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
* Tex. R. App. P . 47.1. NO. 07-01-0341-CR IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL A FEBRUARY

20, 2002

______________________________ TREVOR ROSS W OOD, APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A PPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE CO UNTY COURT OF ARMSTR ONG COUNT Y; NO. 2494; HON ORABLE HUGH REED, JUD GE

_______________________________ Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS an d JOHNSON, JJ. MEMORANDUM OPIN ION * Pursuant to a plea of gui lty, appel lant Trevor Ross Wood was conv icted of driv ing while in toxicated a nd sentenced to 30 da ys confinement in the Armst rong County Jail, suspended for one year, and a $500 f ine. By a sole point of error, appellant contends the2

trial court erre d in denyinghis motion to suppress evidence because the re was no probable cause to stop appellant. For the reasons expressed herein, we reverse and render. Relying on Vi ckna ir v. State, 7 51 S.W.2d 180 (Tex.Cr.App. 1986) , appellant contends his motion to s uppress should have been g ranted because hi s arrest and subsequent

convicti on resulted from an unlawful stop for a cracked ta illight . With commendable professional candor, the St ate agrees w ith appellant t hat his motion to suppress shoul d have been g ranted. Appell ant’s point of error is sustained. Acco rdin gly, the judgment of the trial cour t is reversed and a judg ment of acquittal is hereby rendered. Don H. Reavis Justice Do not publish .
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 288 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     November 15, 2001.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill 
(H.R. 2269) to amend title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 
1974 and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to promote the provision of 
retirement investment advice to workers managing their retirement income assets. 
The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. In lieu of the amendments 
recommended by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on 
Ways and Means now printed in the bill, the amendment in the nature of a 
substitute printed in part A of the report of the Committee on Rules 
accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any 
further amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: 
(1) one hour and 40 minutes of debate on the bill, as amended, with one hour 
equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on Education and the Workforce and 40 minutes equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways 
and Means; (2) the further amendment printed in part B of the report of the 
Committee on Rules, if offered by Representative George Miller of California or 
his designee, which shall be in order without intervention of any point of 
order, shall be considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for one 
hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) 
one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

RIGOBERTO LOPEZ-ROQUE,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-10419

No. 10-10420

D.C. No. 4:10-cr-00061-DCB

D.C. No. 4:10-cr-50013-DCB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 6, 2012** 

Before: B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Rigoberto Lopez-Roque appeals from his

guilty-plea conviction and 51-month sentence for re-entry after deportation, in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326; and the district court’s judgment revoking his

supervised release and imposing a six-month consecutive sentence. Pursuant to

FILED

MAR 09 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-10419

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Lopez-Roque’s counsel has filed a brief

stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel

of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se

supplemental brief. Lopez-Roque has filed a supplemental brief A supplemental

answering brief has not been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s

judgment is AFFIRMED.

In light of the foregoing, Lopez-Roque’s “motion for direct notification by

court to appellant” and the government’s motion for summary affirmance are

DENIED.
1210-AB32-2-1643.html[7/26/2015 9:30:28 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jy1-l141

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2141

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Annie Provence

Address:

2807 Browning

Amarillo, TX, 79103

Email: arprovence@att.net

General Comment

People who direct their own retirement accounts generally have the knowledge and ability to do so, or else they

 are actively gaining it.

The government needs to stay out of the relationship between investors and advisors. There are already laws on

 the books to adequately address any conflicts of interest. Small investors cannot afford large fees. I know I can't.

The alternative is a savings account at the bank.
**Exhibit 32.2**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, W. Douglas Parker, the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of America West Airlines, Inc. (the “Company”) and Derek J. Kerr, the Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:
1.  The Company’s Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March31, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Periodic Report”),fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and 2.  The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 25th day of April 2005.    /s/ W. Douglas Parker      W. Douglas Parker Chief Executive Officer    /s/ Derek J. Kerr      Derek J. Kerr Chief Financial Officer
#### Adelia M. Greenman, *Respondent, v.*Ira W. Watkins, *Appel*lant.—

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Learned, P. J
H. Res. 330

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 23, 2002.

Whereas the future course of the United States depends on

its children and youth;

Whereas educated, confident, and nurtured children will

make our Nation stronger;

Whereas research has shown that mentoring measurably affects young people by increasing school attendance, improving rates of secondary school graduation and college

attendance, decreasing involvement with drugs and alcohol, and decreasing violent behavior;

Whereas considerable numbers of our Nation’s children face

difficult circumstances: 1 out of 4 children lives with only

1 parent; 1 out of 10 children is born to teenaged parents; 1 out of 5 children lives in poverty; and 1 out of

10 children will not finish secondary school;

Whereas mentoring is a proven, effective strategy to combat

such circumstances by matching a caring, responsible

adult with a child to provide guidance, stability, and direction to the child and to build the child’s confidence;

Whereas it is estimated that more than 16,000,000 children

in the United States need or want a mentor but mentoring programs nationwide serve at most 750,000 of

such children;
2

•HRES 330 EH

Whereas a coalition of mentoring organizations have designated January as National Mentoring Month;

Whereas the establishment of a National Mentoring Month

would emphasize the importance of mentoring and recognize with praise and gratitude the many individuals in

the United States who are involved with mentoring; and

Whereas the establishment of a National Mentoring Month

would encourage more individuals to volunteer as mentors, to the benefit of our Nation’s children: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that mentoring relationships can benefit

3 America’s youth and result in improved school attendance

4 and academic achievement.

Attest:

Clerk.
1210-AB32-2-1373.html[7/26/2015 2:46:02 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jw0-ic0l

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1869

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

The government should only protect against fraud in cases related to 401Ks. It should not be dictating whether

 people can act as fiduciaries based on whether the government deems a "conflict of interest" exists. Plan creators

 and participants should determine, based on their self-interest, who can provide proper advising services. The

 government does not know what is in their self-interest and acts against people's self-interest with such

 regulations. Do not establish this rule.
Opinion issued December 7, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-23-00480-CV

———————————

YACKOV YOUSOPOV, Appellant

V.

HARRIS COUNTY TOWING SOLUTIONS, INC.; L ANGEL AUTO 

STORAGE; M5250, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1200237

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant has not paid the filing fee in this case. On July 21, 2023, the 

Court issued a notice that the filing fee had not been paid and that the appeal might 

be dismissed unless appellant paid the fee by August 21, 2023. See TEX. R. APP. P.

5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041; 
2

Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts 

of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. 

Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). After being notified on July 21, 2023 

that the appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant failed to adequately respond. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary 

dismissal of case). Appellant has neither paid the required filing fee nor 

established indigence for purposes of appellate costs.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Any 

pending motions are dismissed as moot. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Guerra.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 160 (Monday, August 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56848-56849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-17965]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases

[[Page 56849]]

Initial Review Group; Fellowships in Digestive Diseases and 
Nutrition Fellowships in Digestive Diseases and Nutrition.
    Date: October 12-13, 2023.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of 
Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Democracy II, Suite 
7000A, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Jian Yang, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
NIDDK/Scientific Review Branch, National Institutes of Health, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Room: 7111, Bethesda, MD 20892-2542, (301) 594-
7799, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8df4ece3eae7cde8f5f9ffeca3e3e4e9e9e6a3e3e4e5a3eae2fb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ff869e919895bf9a878b8d9ed191969b9b94d1919697d1989089">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 16, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-17965 Filed 8-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 32.100 What does this part do?

This part carries out the portion of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (41 U.S.C. 701 *et seq.,* as amended) that applies to grants. It also applies the provisions of the Act to cooperative agreements and other financial assistance awards, as a matter of Federal Government policy.
Editorial Note on Part 397
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 397 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 397.219 Waiver determination and order. ( a ) Upon consideration of the application and other relevant information received or obtained during the proceeding, the Administrator issues an order setting forth his or her determination.
( b ) The Administrator may issue a waiver of preemption order only if he or she finds that the requirement of the State, political subdivision thereof, or Indian tribe affords the public a level of safety at least equal to that afforded by the requirements of the Act and the regulations issued under the Act and does not unreasonably burden commerce. In determining whether the requirement of the State, political subdivision thereof, or Indian tribe unreasonably burdens commerce, the Administrator may consider the following factors: ( 1 ) The extent to which increased costs and impairment of efficiency result from the highway routing designation of the State, political subdivision thereof, or Indian tribe;
( 2 ) Whether the highway routing designation of the State, political subdivision thereof, or Indian tribe has a rational basis;
( 3 ) Whether the highway routing designation of the State, political subdivision thereof, or Indian tribe achieves its stated purpose; and
( 4 ) Whether there is need for uniformity with regard to the subject concerned and if so, whether the highway routing designation of the State, political subdivision thereof, or Indian tribe competes or conflicts with those of other States, political subdivisions thereof, or Indian tribes.
( c ) The order includes a written statement setting forth the relevant facts and the legal basis for the determination, and provides that any person aggrieved by the order may file a petition for reconsideration in accordance with § 397.223.
( d ) The Administrator serves a copy of the order upon the applicant, any other person who participated in the proceeding and upon any other person readily identifiable by the Administrator as one who may be affected by the order. A copy of each order is placed on file in the public docket. The Administrator may publish the order or notice of the order in the Federal Register.
( e ) If no petition for reconsideration is filed within 20 days in accordance with § 397.223, an order issued under this section constitutes the final agency decision regarding whether a particular requirement of a State, political subdivision thereof, or Indian tribe is preempted under the Act or any regulations issued thereunder, or whether preemption is waived.
Exhibit 32.1

         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
          PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Bankshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [SECTION]1350, as adopted pursuant to [SECTION]906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: 1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Union Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by Union
Bankshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


/s/ Kenneth D. Gibbons
_______________________
Kenneth D. Gibbons
Chief Executive Officer


August 13, 2003


<PAGE>  32
From: D Brady [mailto:debrady3@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 4:57 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN1210-AB32

Via this email, I implore you to do the right thing and support requiring financial 

advisors to be restrained from consumer abuse by imposing the necessary fiduciary 

duties upon them.

The fact that they have not had this duty as yet is mind boggling and only makes me, 

and every other consumer, less able to trust our financial markets. We "little guys" are 

really sick of feeling cheated, and sick of feeling that our government is not looking 

out for us.

Please do the right thing and pass this important consumer protection.

Thank you,

Deborah Brady