alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1446.html[7/23/2015 11:09:56 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvo-rwr7

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1446

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I don't think the Govt needs to tell me how to manage my money. They sure aren't setting a good example of

 managing anything. We need a lot less Govt interference in our lives and in our States.
H. Res. 174

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 21, 2001.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2217) making appropriations for the Department of the Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year

ending September 30, 2002, and for other purposes. The first

reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order

against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate

shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour

equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking

minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. After

general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment

under the five-minute rule. Points of order against provisions

in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are

waived except as follows: beginning with ‘‘Provided further,’’

on page 89, line 13, through ‘‘participant:’’ on line 18. Where

points of order are waived against part of a paragraph, points
2

•HRES 174 EH

of order against a provision in another part of such paragraph may be made only against such provision and not

against the entire paragraph. During consideration of the bill

for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole

may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the

Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed

in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for

that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. During consideration of the

bill, points of order against amendments for failure to comply

with clause 2(e) of rule XXI are waived. At the conclusion

of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee

shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall

be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto

to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

 

I, William W. Krippaehne, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of Fisher Communications, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fisher Communications, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 8, 2004
Editorial Note on Part 387
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 387 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 387.407 Surety bonds and certificates of insurance. ( a ) The limits of liability under § 387.405 may be provided by aggregation under the procedures at 49 CFR part 387, subpart C.
( b ) Each policy of insurance used in connection with a certificate of insurance filed with the FMCSA shall be amended by attachment of the appropriate endorsement prescribed by the FMCSA (or the Department of Transportation, where applicable).
[55 FR 11201, Mar. 27, 1990. Redesignated at 61 FR 54710, Oct. 21, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 49942, Sept. 24, 1997]
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ANTHONY CURRINGTON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee

.

No. 4D2023

- 1303

[ July 11, 2024 ]

Appeal from the C ircuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit , St.

Lucie County ; Michael C. Heisey , Judge; L.T. Case No. 562022CF000587A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Robert Porter, Assistant Public

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T. Acuña

, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

G ROSS

, F ORST and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 390.101 Scope. ( a ) The rules in this subpart establish the minimum qualifications for FMCSA certification of a medical examiner and for listing the examiner on FMCSA's National Registry of Certified Medical Examiners. The National Registry of Certified Medical Examiners is designed to improve highway safety and operator health by requiring that medical examiners be trained and certified to determine effectively whether an operator meets FMCSA physical qualification standards under part 391 of this chapter. One component of the National Registry is the registry itself, which is a national database of names and contact information for medical examiners who are certified by FMCSA to perform medical examinations of operators.
( b ) A qualified VA examiner, as defined in either § 390.5 or § 390.5T, may be listed on the National Registry of Certified Medical Examiners by satisfying the requirements for medical examiner certification set forth in either § 390.103 or § 390.123.
[83 FR 26860, June 11, 2018]
Alternative Investment Management Association

The Alternative Investment Management Association Limited

167 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2EA

Tel: +44 (0)20 7822 8380 Fax: +44 (0)20 7822 8381 E-mail: info@aima.org Internet: http://www.aima.org

Registered in England as a Company Limited by Guarantee, No. 4437037. VAT registration no: 577 5913 90. Registered Office as above

Office of Regulations and Interpretations

Office of Exemption Determinations

Employee Benefits Security Administration

Attn: Conflict of Interest Rule (RIN 1210-AB32) and Proposed Best Interest Contract Exemption (ZRIN 

1210-ZA25)

U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20210

Sent by e-mail to: e-ORI@dol.gov and e-OED@dol.gov

29 July 2015

Dear Sir/Madam

AIMA’s response to the Conflicts of Interest Rule and the Proposed Best Interest Contract 

Exemption

The Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) welcomes the opportunity to respond to

the Department of Labor’s Conflict of Interest Rule (the ‘Proposed Rule’) and the Proposed Best 

Interest Contract Exemption (the ‘BIC Exemption’). AIMA has over 1,400 corporate members (with 

over 9,000 individual contacts) worldwide, based in over 50 countries, including the United States. 

Members include hedge fund managers, fund of hedge funds managers, prime brokers and fund 

administrators, many of whom could be impacted by the scope of the Proposed Rule as written. 

AIMA’s manager members have an aggregate of in excess of $1.5 trillion in assets under 

management.

Given the broad scope of the Proposed Rule and the perhaps unintended consequences of the 

extension of fiduciary obligations to fund service providers who are not currently classed as 

fiduciaries, the Proposed Rule is of significant concern to our membership. Rather than submitting 

our own separate response, we simply want to express that we are in agreement with the comments 

set out in the response by Managed Funds Association submitted to you on 21 July 2015 (the ‘MFA 

Response’) and wanted to register the interest of our membership in the outcomes requested in the 

MFA Response.

We look forward to seeing the final rule and exemptions in due course. 

Yours faithfully,

Jiří Król 

Deputy Chief Executive Officer

Global Head of Government Affairs
Facts About Minorities and Organ Donation 

Compiled by Jean Oxendine 

Closing the Gap, Organ and Tissue Donation • May 1998 

•	 The number of minority deceased donors increased from 16 percent in 1988 to 23 percent in 

1995. 

•	 Twelve percent of all deceased donors are Blacks, but 27 percent of those on the organ transplant waiting list are Black. 

•	 Minority organ recipients increased from 20 percent in 1988 to 26 percent in 1995. The 

number of Hispanic organ recipients more than doubled during that time period. 

•	 Minorities comprised 50 percent of the kidney waiting list in 1995, compared to 43 percent in 

1988. Most are Black. 

•	 The decrease in graft survival rates among Black recipients of kidney transplants is more pronounced than for other races. 

•	 Blacks on the kidney waiting list wait longer than Whites for transplants. This is primarily 

because a) the blood group distribution among Black registrants differs from the donor pool, 

which is predominately white; b) Blacks have a higher sensitivity to donor organs than any 

other race; and c) Some HLAs are more rare among Blacks than Whites. HLAs, human leukocyte antigens, are the genetic information encoded on white blood cells. 

•	 Five-year patient survival rates for Black recipients of living donor kidney transplants are lower 

than for other racial groups. Asian survival rates are highest. 

•	 Minority registrants comprised 14 percent of all kidney-pancreas waiting list registrants in 

1995, up from 11 percent in 1992. 

•	 Black registrants wait longer for kidney-pancreas transplants than candidates of other races. In 

1995, the median waiting time for all races overall was 298 days, and 345 for Blacks. 

•	 Patient survival rates for Black and Asian liver recipients are lower than for other races. 

•	 The number of minorities waiting for hearts increased from 13 percent of all registrants in 

1988 to 18 percent in 1995. 

•	 Minorities comprised 13 percent of lung recipients in 1995, up from 3 percent in 1988. 

Source: United Network for Organ Sharing 

Office of Minority Health Resource Center	 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
NORWEST FINANCIAL INC AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         181,443
<SECURITIES>                                 1,122,335
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,630,338
<ALLOWANCES>                                   332,175
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         255,736
<DEPRECIATION>                                 118,967
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,813,151
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                      7,708,234<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,855
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,496,973
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,813,151
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               907,548
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               353,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               130,480
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             234,053
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                189,715
<INCOME-TAX>                                    66,719
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   122,996
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>NORWEST FINANCIAL HAS A NON-CLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET
SO THIS INFORMATION IS UNAVAILABLE.
<F2>INCLUDES $2.4 BILLION OF SHORT-TERM LOANS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21.1



OHIO EDISON COMPANY

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
AT DECEMBER 31, 1997



Pennsylvania Power Company - Incorporated in Pennsylvania

OES Fuel, Incorporated - Incorporated in Ohio

OES Ventures, Incorporated - Incorporated in Ohio

OES Capital, Incorporated - Incorporated in Ohio

OES Finance, Incorporated - Incorporated in Ohio

OES Nuclear, Incorporated - Incorporated in Ohio

Ohio Edison Financing Trust - Incorporated in Delaware

Ohio Edison Financing Trust II - Incorporated in Delaware



Statement of Differences
                    ------------------------


Exhibit Number 21, List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant at
December 31, 1997, is not included in the printed document.
IV

House Calendar No. 66

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 217

[Report No. 107–179]

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 1 (legislative day, JULY 31), 2001

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

1 Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on

2 the legislative day of Wednesday, September 5, 2001, for

3 the Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend

4 the rules. The Speaker or his designee shall consult with

5 the Minority Leader or his designee on the designation

6 of any matter for consideration pursuant to this resolu7 tion.
House Calendar No. 66

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 217

[Report No. 107–179]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend

the rules.

AUGUST 1 (legislative day, JULY 31), 2001

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

H ERIBERTO ARMENDARIZ

,

Appellant,

v.

MARIA C. FLORES

,

Appellee. **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 2 1

- 00 1 00

- CV

Appeal from the

38 3 rd D istrict Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2021DCV0897 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appell ee ’s third m otion for extension of time within which to file

the brief until Jul y 2 , 2022

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO F ILE

THE APPELL EE ’ S BR IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon

. Veronica Teresa Lerma , the Appell ee ’s attorney,

prepare the Appell ee ’ s brief and forward the same to this Court on or b efore July 2 , 2022

.

I T IS SO ORDERED this 1 st day of June , 2022

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley , JJ.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 31

Commending the people of Israel for reaffirming, through their participation

in the election of February 6, 2001, their dedication to democratic

ideals, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 7, 2001

Mr. CANTOR (for himself, Mr. ARMEY, Mr. DELAY, Mr. HYDE, Mr. GILMAN,

Mr. ISRAEL, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. SCHROCK, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. SISISKY, Mr.

FERGUSON, Mr. TIBERI, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. CRENSHAW,

Mr. REYNOLDS, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. DIAZBALART, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. FOSSELLA, Mr. WATKINS, Mrs. DAVIS of

California, and Mr. THOMAS M. DAVIS of Virginia) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International

Relations

RESOLUTION

Commending the people of Israel for reaffirming, through

their participation in the election of February 6, 2001,

their dedication to democratic ideals, and for other purposes.

Whereas since its establishment in 1948, Israel has fulfilled

the dreams of its founders who envisioned a vigorous,

open, and stable democracy;

Whereas the centerpiece of Israeli democracy is its system of

competitive and free elections;
2

•HRES 31 IH

Whereas on February 6, 2001, the people of Israel went to

the polls in a reasonably peaceful election; and

Whereas this election is only the latest example of the commitment of Israel to the democratic ideals of freedom and

pluralism, ideals that Israel shares with the United

States: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) commends the people of Israel for reaffirm3 ing, through their participation in the election of

4 February 6, 2001, their dedication to democratic

5 ideals;

6 (2) congratulates Ariel Sharon on his election

7 as Prime Minister of Israel;

8 (3) pledges to work with the new Government

9 of Israel to strengthen the bonds between the United

10 States and Israel; and

11 (4) reaffirms its commitment to secure peace

12 and security for Israel.

Æ
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1427.html[7/23/2015 10:37:33 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvn-pgzi

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1427

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Debbie Pitsenbarger

General Comment

Please do not regulate my retirement savings and make it difficult for me to retire. I am taxed at such a high rate

 now, it is unethical. It is not what should take place. We are not a communist country and I pray never will be.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on June 6, 2023, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), R Consortium, Inc. (“R Consortium”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Mango Solutions has changed its name to Ascent Data Science, Bristol, UNITED KINGDOM.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and R Consortium intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On September 15, 2015, R Consortium filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on October 2, 2015 (80 FR 59815).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on January 4, 2023. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on January 25, 2023 (88 FR 4850).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2023-18055 Filed 8-21-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P