alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>             
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1999
<CASH>                                          46,219
<SECURITIES>                                    14,301
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,381
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,716
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               130,354
<PP&E>                                         122,577
<DEPRECIATION>                                  79,004
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 203,008
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,573
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       130,412
<OTHER-SE>                                          23
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   203,008
<SALES>                                         48,015
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                81,442
<CGS>                                            7,127
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,431
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                52,547
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,925
<INCOME-TAX>                                       877
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,048
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,048
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        


</TABLE>
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1228.html[7/22/2015 4:08:27 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jve-wrwx

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1228

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Terry Morgan

General Comment

Leave my 401 alone.
Exhibit 23




                        CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


      We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
No. 33-21095, 33-40263, 33-53952, 33-5214, 2-97766, 33-5218 and 33-42696 of The
Coastal Corporation on Forms S-8 and Registration Statement No. 33-48435 of The
Coastal Corporation on Form S-3 of our report dated February 1, 1996, appearing
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Coastal Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 1995.






DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP



Houston, Texas
March 26, 1996
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Tennessee Valley Authority

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

Tennessee Valley Authority (Meeting No. 07-05).

# Time and Date:

 9 a.m. CDT, September 27, 2007, Huntsville Marriott, 5 Tranquility Base,  Huntsville, Alabama 35805.

## Agenda

### Old Business

                    Approval of minutes of August 1, 2007, Board Meeting.                          ( print page 54509)    

### New Business

1. President's Report.

2. Report of the Finance, Strategy, and Rates Committee:

A. TVA annual budget for FY 2008.

B. Asset Retirement Obligations Trust.

C. Regulatory accounting changes.

D. Authorization to issue bonds.

E. Customer issues.

i. Extension of contract with a directly-served customer.

ii. New interruptible product—60-Minute Response program.

3. Report of the Operations, Environment, and Safety Committee:

A. Combined cycle project.

B. Bellefonte Combined Construction Permit & Operating License Application.

4. Report of the Human Resources Committee:

A. Winning Performance measures and balanced scorecard.

B. TVA Contribution to TVA Retirement System.

C. Award of contract for prescription drug benefits.

5. Report of the Audit and Ethics Committee:

A. Selection of external auditor.

6. Report of the Community Relations Committee.

7. Report of the Corporate Governance Committee:

A. Appointment of assistant secretary.

For more information: Please call TVA Media Relations at (865) 632-6000, Knoxville, Tennessee. Information is also available at TVA's Washington Office (202) 898-2999. People who plan to attend the meeting and have special needs should call (865) 632-6000. Anyone who wishes to comment on any of the agenda in writing may send their comments to: TVA Board of Directors, Board Agenda Comments, 400 West Summit Hill Drive, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902.

Dated: September 20, 2007.

Maureen H. Dunn,

General Counsel and Secretary.

[FR Doc. 07-4736 Filed 9-21-07; 2:28 pm]

BILLING CODE 8120-08-P
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 53234]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4610]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket No. DOD-2007-HA-0056]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by October 
18, 2007.
    Title and OMB Number: Facilitating Provider Acceptance of TRICARE 
Standard; OMB Control Number 0720-TBD.
    Type of Request: New.
     Number of Respondents: 72.
    Response Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Response: 72.
    Average Burden Per Response: 1.5 hours.
    Annual Burden Hours: 108.
    Needs and uses: The information collection requirement is necessary 
to obtain specific responses why some providers do not participate in 
TRICARE and then to learn what kinds of actions by the TRICARE 
Management Activity, working in conjunction with the TRICARE Regional 
Offices and the three managed care support contractors, would be 
required to increase the number of providers in the TRICARE program.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit; Federal government.
    Frequency: One time.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. John Kraemer.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Kraemer at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following methods:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management 
Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 
22209-2133.

    Dated: September 11, 2007.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 07-4610 Filed 9-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 450

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 450 appear at 74 FR 49241, Sept. 25, 2009, and at 77 FR 59790, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 450.1 Purpose.

This subchapter establishes requirements and procedures for safety approval and periodic examination of cargo containers used in international transport, as defined in the International Safe Container Act.

[45 FR 37213, June 2, 1980]
RB

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0334

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CECIL LEE RUSSELL,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

to and including June 12, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 6 2020

05/06/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0334
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of CEO Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Comprehensive Care Corporation (the “Company”) for the year endedDecember 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2010 (the “Report”), Clark Marcus, as Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that: 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company. 

 

This certification accompaniesthis Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Comprehensive Care Corporation and will be retained by Comprehensive Care Corporation and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

90
Exhibit 10.1


Univest Capital Limited
________________________________________________________________________________
Meierhofstrasse 2 FL-9490 Vaduz


December 3, 2005

Mr. Walter Witoshkin
QuantRx Biomedical Corporation
321 Norristown Road, Suite 230
Ambler, PA 19002


Dear Mr. Witoshkin

The purpose of this letter agreement (the "Agreement") is to set forth the
terms and conditions pursuant to which Uninvest Capital Ltd. shall introduce
QuantRx Biomedical Corporation (the "Company") to one or more investors in
connection with the proposed offering (the "Offering") of securities of the
Company. The terms of such Offering and the Securities shall be mutually
agreed upon by the Company and the investors. Uninvest Capital Ltd.
engagement under this Agreement shall be non-exclusive.

In consideration of the services rendered by Uninvest Capital Ltd. under
this Agreement, the Company agrees to pay Uninvest Capital Ltd. the
following fees and other compensation: A cash fee payable upon the closing
of the Offering equal to 8% of the aggregate capital raised by Uninvest
Capital Ltd. and warrants to purchase 8% of the shares to be issued on an as
converted basis of this Offering to the investors introduced by Uninvest
Capital Ltd

This agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Pennsylvania,
without regard to conflicts of law principle. Any dispute arising out of
this agreement shall be adjudicated in the courts of the State of
Pennsylvania or in the federal courts sitting in the Eastern District.

This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding and agreement between
the parties hereto with respect to its subject matter and there are no
agreements or understandings with respect to the subject matter hereof which
are not contained in this agreement. If the foregoing correctly states our
agreement, please confirm this by signing and returning to us the duplicate
copy of this letter.

Thank you.

Univest Capital Limited


By: /s/Emst Pernet
    -----------------------------------
    Emst Pernet
    Manager


Agreed to and accepted as of the date first written above:

QuantRx Biomedical Corporation


By: /s/Walter Witoshkin
    -----------------------------------
    Walter Witoshkin
    President & CEO
1210-AB32-2-1311.html[7/26/2015 1:24:18 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvv-1wbh

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1806

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: matt hamblin

General Comment

I don't need the government getting in my business about my retirement account
```

[House Document 109-82]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                     

109th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 109-82
 
NOTIFICATION TO ENTER INTO A FREE TRADE AGREEMENT WITH THE REPUBLIC OF 
                                  PERU

                               __________

                                MESSAGE

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              Transmitting

   NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ENTER INTO A FREE TRADE AGREEMENT WITH THE 
REPUBLIC OF PERU, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2105(a)(1)(A) OF THE TRADE 
    ACT OF 2002 (PUB. L. 107-210), PURSUANT TO 19 U.S.C. 2112(e)(1)

  January 31, 2006.--Message and accompanying papers referred to the 
         Committee on Ways and Means and ordered to be printed
                                           The White House,
                                       Washington, January 6, 2006.
Hon. J. Dennis Hastert,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
    Dear Mr. Speaker: Consistent with section 2105(a)(1)(A) of 
the Trade Act of 2002, (Public Law 107-210; the ``Trade Act''), 
I am pleased to notify the Congress of my intention to enter 
into a free trade agreement with the Republic of Peru.
    The United States-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement will 
generate export opportunities for U.S. farmers, ranchers, and 
companies, help create jobs in the United States, and help 
American consumers save money while offering them more choices. 
The Agreement will also benefit the people of Peru by providing 
economic opportunity and by strengthening democracy.
    Consistent with the Trade Act, I am sending this 
notification at least 90 days in advance of signing the 
Agreement. My Administration looks forward to working with the 
Congress in developing appropriate legislation to approve and 
implement this Agreement.
            Sincerely,
                                                    George W. Bush.

                                  

```
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0482 Directorate Identifier: 2012-NE-14-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspect 12.5 $1,062.5

0

$0 $1,062.50 200 $212,500.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $212,500

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

Replace disk 48.0 $4,080.00 $225,000 $229,080.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): RR estimates 

that 10% of the disks will need to be replaced after being rejected during the SQUID inspection. In 

addition, 76 disks will be removed at a lower life than listed in the current Airworthiness 
Limitations Section of the engine manual. Using the above disk replacement cost, the total cost 

from retiring disks at a life lower than that shown in the ALS is estimated to be $764,000. Cost 

estimated by ASE based on cost of a Trent 800 Stage 5-6 HPC disk. Not covered under warranty. 

The total costs of compliance for the US fleet is $212,500 plus $764,000 = $976,500.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
#### Ex Parte Lewis Littlefield.

No. 1602.

Decided March 26, 1898.

County Convict—Discharge by Season of Sickness—Construction of Statute.

Under provisions of article 3737, Revised Statutes, which authorizes the discharge of a county convict who, being unable to work from sickness, to satisfy the judgment by remaining in jail until the fine and costs are discharged, at the rate of one dollar per day, required that the convict must remain in jail, and that he was sick during the time in the jail. Sickness at home during the required time will not avail.

Appeal from Gonzales County.

Appeal from a judgment remanding relator to custody rendered on a habeas corpus hearing in chambers before Hon. W. W. Glass, County Judge.

The opinion states the case.

*Atkinson &*Abernathy, for relator.

*Nat P. Jackson*and *Mann*Trice, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

*120HURT, Presiding Judge.

Relator was convicted of theft under the value of $50, and his punishment assessed at ten days imprisonment in the county jail and a fine of $50. The costs amounted to $73.60; or a total of fine and costs, $123.60. The conviction occurred on the 16th of February, 1897. On the 3d of January, 1898, relator applied for and obtained a writ of habeas corpus from the county judge of Gonzales County, and on the hearing of said writ was remanded to custody. Relator avers that he is too poor to pay the fine and costs, is in bad health, and unable to work to pay the same, and that he has not been offered an opportunity by the Commissioners Court to discharge said fine and costs. The evidence adduced on the trial shows or discloses that appellant has worked in all eighteen days towards discharging the fine and costs; that he then became sick, and was permitted by the county superintendent to go home, and that he remained at home, and while at home wrote to the county judge to the effect that he was sick, and obtained his permission to remain at home until he recovered. On the 22d of November, 1897, he was arrested under a capias pro fine, placed in jail, and on the 3d of January, 1898, resorted to the writ of habeas corpus for his discharge.

Article 3737, Revised Statutes 1895, provides: “A convict, who from age, disease, or other disability, physical or mental, is unable to do manual labor, shall not be required to work, but shall remain in jail until his term of imprisonment is ended, or until the fine and costs adjudged against him are discharged, at the rate of one dollar for each day of such confinement in jail.” This is the statute under which the relator seeks his discharge. The evidence does not disclose that he was confined in jail, while sick, a sufficient length of time to discharge the fine and costs. It does show, however, sickness for a sufficient length of time, and shows conclusively that he was not in jail, but at home. Now, to be entitled to one dollar per day when sick, he must be in jail, and he must show that he was sick and in jail, in order to obtain the benefit of the provisions of the statute quoted. This he did not show, nor does the record show it. The judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*