alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Matthew Watts [mailto:Matthew.Watts@RaymondJames.com] 

Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 10:12 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32 

A testimonial about variable annuities submitted to Raymond James by two of our clients:

August 16, 2015

To: Financial Advisor

FROM; Raymond James Clients

SUBJECT: Testimonial for Why I Like Variable Annuities

There are three main reasons I like variable annuities. First I like it for the security blanket or downside 

protection. It allows me to sleep at night knowing I cannot lose my principle. Secondly, I like the 

Guaranteed Withdrawal Benefits (GWB). I know that I will have a guaranteed flow of income for the 

rest of my life and my wife. We have all our fixed expenses covered no matter what happens to the 

market. Finally, I know my GWB is growing at a minimum of 7% per year even if the market is declining.

In the final analysis, variable annuities are a part and a very important part of my total portfolio.
#### § 570.54 Definitions.

Unless otherwise indicated, all terms used in this part that are defined in part 571 of this chapter, Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, are used as defined in that part.

*Air-over-hydraulic brake subsystem* means a subsystem of the air brake that uses compressed air to transmit a force from the driver control to a hydraulic brake system to actuate the service brakes.

*Electric brake system* means a system that uses electric current to actuate the service brake.

*Vacuum brake system* means a system that uses a vacuum and atmospheric pressure for transmitting a force from the driver control to the service brake, but does not include a system that uses vacuum only to assist the driver in applying muscular force to hydraulic or mechanical components.
§ 520.3 Definitions. ( a ) *Environmental assessment* is a written analysis describing the environmental impact of a proposed or ongoing agency action, submitted to the agency either by its grantees or contractors, or by any person outside the agency as part of any program or project proposal within the scope of activities listed in § 520.4(b).
( b ) *Environmental review* is a formal evaluation undertaken by the agency, culminating in a brief document (the environmental review report), to determine whether a proposed or ongoing NHTSA action may have a significant impact on the environment. The review document will be included in the proposed or ongoing agency action, and either support a negative declaration or recommend the preparation of a draft environmental impact statement.
( c ) *Draft environmental impact statement* (DEIS) means a preliminary statement on the environmental impact of a proposed or ongoing NHTSA action which is circulated for comment and review within and outside NHTSA.
( d ) *Final environmental impact statement* (FEIS) means a detailed statement which, pursuant to section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act, identifies and analyzes the anticipated environmental impact of a proposed or ongoing NHTSA action.
( e ) *Negative declaration* means a statement prepared subsequent to an environmental review, which states that a proposed or ongoing NHTSA action will have no significant environmental impact and therefore does not require a draft or final environmental impact statement.
§ 33.80 Adjustments or exceptions. ( a ) A person may submit a request to the Defense Production Act Activities Coordinator, Office of Intelligence Security, and Emergency Response, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, for an adjustment or exception on the ground that: ( 1 ) A provision of this part or an official action results in an undue or exceptional hardship on that person not suffered generally by others in similar situations and circumstances; or
( 2 ) The consequences of following a provision of this part or an official action are contrary to the intent of the Defense Production Act and other applicable statutes, or this part.
( b ) Each request for adjustment or exception must be in writing and contain a complete statement of all the facts and circumstances related to the provision of this part or official action from which adjustment or exception is sought and a full and precise statement of the reasons why relief should be provided.
( c ) The submission of a request for adjustment or exception shall not relieve any person from the obligation of complying with the provision of this part or official action in question while the request is being considered unless such interim relief is granted in writing by the Office of Intelligence, Security, and Emergency Response.
( d ) A decision of the Defense Production Act Activities Coordinator under this section may be appealed to the Assistant Secretary for Administration. (For information on the appeal procedure, see § 33.81.)
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 53590]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4621]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel, Prevention of Dementia.
    Date: October 4, 2007.
    Time: 3:20 p.m. to 3:50 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Marriott Bethesda, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 
20814. (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Louise L. Hsu, PhD, Health Scientist 
Administrator, Scientific Review Office, National Institute on 
Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue/Suite 2C212, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-7705, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#79110a0c15391c01140c0b5717101857171011571e160f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="422a31372e02273a2f37306c2c2b236c2c2b2a6c252d34">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel, Epigenetics and Aging.
    Date: October 18-19, 2007.
    Time: 5 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Silver Spring, 8727 Colesville Road, Silver 
Spring, MD 20910.
    Contact Person: Elaine Lewis, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Office, National Institute on 
Aging, Gateway Building, Suite 2C212, MSC-9205, 7201 Wisconsin 
Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7707, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#20454c41494e454c45574953604e49410e4e49480e474f56"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9df8f1fcf4f3f8f1f8eaf4eeddf3f4fcb3f3f4f5b3faf2eb">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 12, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-4621 Filed 9-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Henry D. Tucker, Respondent, v. Caroline L. Ely and others, Appellants.

Judgment and order affirmed. Opinion by

Haight, J.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0967.html[7/21/2015 6:59:03 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-o6uk

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0967

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Lillianne Echevarria

General Comment

I'm smart enough. Leave my 401k alone
#### § 37.205 Additional passengers who use wheelchairs.

If a number of wheelchair users exceeding the number of securement locations on the bus seek to travel on a trip, the operator shall assign the securement locations on a first come-first served basis. The operator shall offer boarding assistance and the opportunity to sit in a vehicle seat to passengers who are not assigned a securement location. If the passengers who are not assigned securement locations are unable or unwilling to accept this offer, the operator is not required to provide transportation to them on the bus.
J

- A32006

- 14

COMMONWEALTH OF PENN SYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

Appellee

v.

ROD MATTHEWS

Appellant No. 415 EDA 2013

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence September 21, 2012

In the Court of Common Pleas of Philade lphia County

Criminal Division at No(s): CP

- 51

- CR

- 0009582

- 2010

BEFORE: PANELLA, J., OLSON, J., and FITZGERALD, J. *

DISSENTING STATEMENT BY FITZGERALD, J.: FILED MAY 26, 2015

The majority has astutely considered Appellant’s Brady 1 claim based

on the nondisclosure of the arresting officers’ statements to internal affairs.

I write separately, however, because I am of the view that Appellant

established a Brady violation. Accordingly, rather than remand for a further

hearing on the materiality of the officers’ statements a nd the prejudice

resulting from the Commonwealth’s failure to disclose, I would vacate the

judgment of sentence and remand for a new trial. Therefore, I respectfully

dissent.

* Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court.

1 Brady v. Marylan d , 373 U.S. 83 (1963).
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1060.html[7/22/2015 7:10:04 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-makj

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1060

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Stanley Chang

Address:

4147 Outlook Blvd Unit F

Pueblo, CO, 81008

Email: stan3010@yahoo.com

General Comment

Govt politicians are good at getting re-elected & selling out the citizenry, not much else. So keep your bloody

 mitts off my money. I dont need you to to dump another turd in the punchbowl.
#### § 367.50 Fees Under the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and Agreement for Registration Years Beginning in 2025 and Each Subsequent Registration Year Thereafter.

Table 1 to [§ 367.50](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-367.50)—Fees Under the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and Agreement for Registration Years Beginning in 2025 and Each Subsequent Registration Year Thereafter

| Bracket | Number of commercial motor vehicles owned or operated by exempt or non-exempt motor carrier, motor private carrier, or freight forwarder | Fee per entity for exempt or non- exempt motor carrier, motor private carrier, or freight forwarder | Fee per entity for broker or leasing company |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| B1 | 0-2 | $46 | $46 |
| B2 | 3-5 | 138 | |
| B3 | 6-20 | 276 | |
| B4 | 21-100 | 963 | |
| B5 | 101-1,000 | 4,592 | |
| B6 | 1,001 and above | 44,836 | |

[[89 FR 51276](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/89-FR-51276), June 17, 2024]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           6,073
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,339
<ALLOWANCES>                                       137
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,979
<PP&E>                                           2,538
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,774
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,133
<BONDS>                                             19
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,413
<OTHER-SE>                                     (20,472)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,093
<SALES>                                          1,764
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,165
<CGS>                                              533
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,831
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  16
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,014)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,014)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,014)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.26)
        

</TABLE>
----

----

**Exhibit      32.1**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of and for the period(s) covered in the                Report. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                March 5, 2007 |   |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|--------|

|   | By:    | /s/                Richard M. Lavers   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   |   | Richard                M. Lavers       |
|   |   | Chief                Executive Officer |

----

**Exhibit      32.2**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of and for the period(s) covered in the                Report. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                March 5, 2007 |   |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|--------|

|   | By:    | /s/                Colleen A. Zuhl     |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   |   | Colleen                A. Zuhl         |
|   |   | Chief                Financial Officer |

----

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2011 

t0620 

Order 

 

June 28, 2011 

142925 

KIRK LEAPHART, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 142925 

 COA: 301016 

Wayne CC: 09-020326-NO 

CITY OF DETROIT, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 10, 2011 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 31-6



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) OF THE

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



I,
Robert K. McDonald, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Commonwealth Edison Company; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                                                                                               
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 18, 2009 |  | /s/    ROBERT K.
MCDONALD                                                                                     
|                        |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Chief Risk Officer (Principal Financial Officer)



64
#### § 38.2 Equivalent facilitation.

Departures from particular technical and scoping requirements of these guidelines by use of other designs and technologies are permitted where the alternative designs and technologies used will provide substantially equivalent or greater access to and usability of the vehicle. Departures are to be considered on a case-by-case basis under procedures set forth in § 37.7 of this title.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/21/15 7:21 AM

Received: July 13, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jyp-5vqx

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2220

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: PATRICIA GREMBOS

General Comment

As your constituent, the financial future of my family is deeply important. I have become 

increasingly concerned that the Department of Labors (DOL) proposed retirement rule will limit 

my options when it comes to saving for retirement. I am also concerned the proposal may 

unnecessarily raise costs for me to receive in-person help with my IRA.

We all agree that Americans should be doing more to save for retirement and financial 

professionals who provide savings help should be acting in the best interests of those they serve. 

However, I have serious concerns about the impact the DOLs proposal will have on retirement 

savers like me, whether they are in an IRA or a 401(k). The effect of the DOLs 700-page 

proposal is that Americans could be forced to pay high fees for hourly or fee-based services they 

dont want or need, or, even worse, left without advice to fend for themselves online. Experts 

believe this will make our retirement savings crisis worse. Without access to affordable in-person 

guidance, middle-income Americans will miss out on the financial education they need and will 

save less for retirement.

The DOLs long list of complex restrictions and requirements may effectively prevent me from 

choosing what fits my needs. Why should I be forced into more expensive plans or have to 

accept less access to financial guidance because of a government regulation?
At a time when saving for retirement is so difficult, I cannot afford rules that create new 

obstacles to achieving my retirement goals. The DOL has gone beyond clients best interests in a 

way that constrains choice, raises costs, and puts my financial well-being at risk. Instead, 

Congress should intervene with the DOL to protect my choice of retirement products and 

services at the price I want to pay.

I urge my fellow Americans to support legislation that protects IRAs and my retirement choices 

from the DOL rule.
# Continuation of U.S. Drug Interdiction Assistance to the Government of Colombia

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the Secretary of Defense

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, and pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 1012 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995, as amended (22 U.S.C. 2291-4), I hereby certify, with respect to Colombia, that: (1) interdiction of aircraft reasonably suspected to be primarily engaged in illicit drug trafficking in that country's airspace is necessary, because of the extraordinary threat posed by illicit drug trafficking to the national security of that country; and (2) Colombia has appropriate procedures in place to protect against innocent loss of life in the air and on the ground in connection with such interdiction, which includes effective means to identify and warn an aircraft before the use of force is directed against the aircraft.

                        The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to publish this determination in the                         *Federal Register*                         and to notify the Congress of this determination.                    

[FR Doc. 2023-18102

Billing code 4710-10-P