alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1362.html[7/23/2015 6:18:06 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvl-zler

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1362

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

As an educated and informed American Citizen, I am knowledgeable enough to know how to invest and spend

 the money I set aside for retirement in my 401k and IRA. I have long FEARED the Gov't involvement in my

 retirement accounts and as such, I have reduced my deposits over the years. This is yet another reason why I

 must now proactively decide if I should eliminate all contributions. 

I am a service connected disabled veteran and a Virginian.
1210-AB32-2-1260.html[7/24/2015 9:42:44 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvu-coxv

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1755

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Valerie Anonymous

General Comment

"Department of Labor is starting to enact regulations that would restrict how you use your own money for your

 retirement", please explain what you mean by this, restrict how?
IB

Union Calendar No. 174

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2366

[Report No. 104–323, Parts I and II]

To repeal an unnecessary medical device reporting requirement.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 19, 1995

Mrs. VUCANOVICH (for herself and Mr. WAXMAN) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in addition

to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

NOVEMBER 7, 1995

Reported from the Committee on Commerce, without amendment

NOVEMBER 7, 1995

Reported from the Committee on Ways and Means, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be

printed

A BILL

To repeal an unnecessary medical device reporting

requirement.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2366 RH

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL.

2 Section 1862 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

3 1395y) is amended by striking subsection (h).

Union Calendar No. 174

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2366

[Report No. 104–323, Parts I and II]

A BILL

To repeal an unnecessary medical device reporting

requirement.

NOVEMBER 7, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
From: Monte Merken [mailto:montemerken@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2015 2:37 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: DOL Proposed Legislation

This is typical misguided PC overkill which seems to be the norm for our "elected" 

representatives. Before such proposals are made they (the politicians) should be required to 

interface with financial professionals who already provide more than adequate options to their 

clients and referrals who are badly in need of these services.

In an environment where too many consumers are not adequately planning and providing for 

their retirement this legislation will further exacerbate the ability of even more hard working 

consumers to obtain the products necessary for a successful retirement in the name of more "over 

regulation."

Another case of the supposed "squeaky wheel" being oiled by which a few unfortunate scenarios 

dictate to the vast majority of those being properly advised and serviced toward their saving and 

retirement goals.

Monte Merken, DFP, HIP, LPRT, LUTCF

CA License 0387916

Merken Insurance & Investment Services Email: montemerken@yahoo.com

Health Insurance: www.montesinsurancesolutions.com

Lincoln Financial Securities Corp.,

Branch Mgr. & Registered Rep.

Email: mmerken@securitiesmail.com, www.LFSecurities.com

Master Account Executive, Petersen International Underwriters, A Lloyd's of London 

Correspondent Providing Solutions - When Other Companies Cannot or Will Not

West Hills, CA 91307 Fax/Ph: (818) 226-0914, Cell: (818) 274-9947

Call me for a FREE - DISABILITY, LIFE, HEALTH, LONG TERM CARE, ESTATE or 

RETIREMENT PLANNING Consultation for you, your family or your company

Member: NAHU, National Assn. of Health Underwriters, LAAHU, Los Angeles Chapter, Board 

Member 10 years VCAHU, Ventura County Chapter, Past President 2013-14, Board Member

Member: CPAT-Calif. Partnership for Access to Treatment, SFSP, Society of Financial Service 

Professionals, L.A. Chapter, IDIS, International Disability Insurance Society
Exhibit 31.1



Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer







I, Roy Dalene, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Hamptons Luxury Homes, Inc.



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and



c)

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls.



6.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: September 13, 2005



/s/ Roy Dalene



Roy Dalene

Chief Executive Officer
Order entered July 2, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00369
- CR
JAMES EDWARD GRUMBLE S, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas Trial Co urt Cause No. F11
- 70745
- Y



### O RDER
The Court DENIES appellant’s June 18, 2013 pro se motion for reasonable bail pending appeal. This is not the proper Court in which to file a motion regarding a bond pending appeal.
See T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P. A NN . art. 44.04( d). Moreover, appellant is represented by counsel and is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Rudd v. State , 616 S.W.2d 623 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1981).

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
Editorial Note on Part 393
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 393 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 393.80 Rear-vision mirrors. ( a ) Every bus, truck, and truck tractor shall be equipped with two rear-vision mirrors, one at each side, firmly attached to the outside of the motor vehicle, and so located as to reflect to the driver a view of the highway to the rear, along both sides of the vehicle. All such regulated rear-vision mirrors and their replacements shall meet, as a minimum, the requirements of FMVSS No. 111 (49 CFR 571.111) in force at the time the vehicle was manufactured.
( b ) *Exceptions.* ( 1 ) Mirrors installed on a vehicle manufactured prior to January 1, 1981, may be continued in service, provided that if the mirrors are replaced they shall be replaced with mirrors meeting, as a minimum, the requirements of FMVSS No. 111 (49 CFR 571.111) in force at the time the vehicle was manufactured.
( 2 ) Only one outside mirror shall be required, which shall be on the driver's side, on trucks which are so constructed that the driver has a view to the rear by means of an interior mirror.
( 3 ) In driveway-towaway operations, the driven vehicle shall have at least one mirror furnishing a clear view to the rear.
[48 FR 57139, Dec. 28, 1983, as amended at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001]
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/18/15 6:30 PM

Received: July 07, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jup-fgwy

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0491

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Edmond Dantes

General Comment

Dear Sir or Madam:

First, thank you for reading my comment and for all your work on this very important issue.

I fully support the proposed rule on the definition of fiduciary and conflicts of interest in 

retirement investment advice. For too long, financial industry professionals have been raiding the 

retirement accounts of middle-class investors to earn increased commissions and fees while 

avoiding a meaningful duty to manage the accounts entrusted to them. Numerous advertisements 

by financial professionals or firms offering retirement products encourage investors to trust those 

professionals or firms with a lifetime's worth of savings. Such a significant undertaking to 

manage an individual's or family's lifetime prosperity should certainly come with a 

commensurately high legal standard of care.

While some professionals claim that a suitability or best interests standard is sufficient, these 

standards are so weak as to offer little meaningful protection for retirement investors. For 

example, brokers may pad their fee income through churning investments in retirement accounts, 

particularly when brokers are compensated by selling loaded mutual funds. Brokers can hide 

behind a defense that all of the investments were suitable for the investors and offered "enhanced 

growth opportunities" or some similar fluffy argument. Investors may not even be aware that 
such abusive practices are occurring, as brokers or firms often encourage investors to put their 

trust in the professionals.

I would also encourage you to include a provision that the customer/investor has an un-waivable 

right to pursue a claim for breach of the fiduciary duty in Federal court. For years, brokerages 

have been inserting mandatory arbitration clauses to force investors to seek relief without 

protections of the legal trial process. Furthermore, the industry standard arbitration is itself a 

conflict of interest working against investors. Brokers pay fees to the organization that hires 

arbitrators to hear cases against those same brokers. I would encourage you to take lightly any 

criticisms of the conflict-of-interest protections in the proposed rule from organizations or 

professionals who have incorporated conflicts of interest into their business models.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1307.html[7/22/2015 10:11:39 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jve-wamj

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1307

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Another New Yorker

General Comment

No regulations are needed on how I decide save for my retirement. Any plans to further restrict the personal use

 of my funds will only halt traditional investments, and force me into alternate means to provide for myself in my

 future. After all, Its my money and my future your attempting to regulate.
#### In the Matter of the Application of the Grade Crossing Commissioners of the City of Buffalo, Appellants, for the Appointment of Commissioners to Ascertain the Compensation to Be Paid to the Owners of and Parties Interested in Lands Which May Be Injured by the Change of Grade of Swan and Jefferson Streets. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company et al., Appellants; Mary A. Anderson et al., Respondents.

(Submitted April 24, 1911;

decided May 2, 1911.)

Motion to amend remittitur. (See 201 N. Y. 32.)

Motion granted. Remittitur to be recalled and amended by striking therefrom the provision allowing costs in all courts, and inserting instead thereof a provision that the reversal is without costs to either party.
§ 372.301 Terminal areas of motor carriers and freight forwarders at municipalities served. The terminal area within the meaning of 49 U.S.C. 13503 of any motor carrier of property or freight forwarder subject to 49 U.S.C. subtitle IV, part B at any municipality authorized to be served by such motor carrier of property or motor carrier of passengers in the transportation of express or freight forwarder, within which transportation by motor carrier in the performance of transfer, collection, or delivery services may be performed by, or for, such motor carrier of property or freight forwarder without compliance with the provisions of 49 U.S.C. subtitle IV, part B consists of and includes all points or places which are: ( a ) Within the commercial zone, as defined by the Secretary, of that municipality, and
( b ) Not beyond the limits of the operating authority of such motor carrier of property or freight forwarder.
[62 FR 15422, Apr. 1, 1997]
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   February  27, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Patricia K. Collawn                          |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                |   | Patricia K. Collawn                                                                                                                                                           |
|                                                |   | President and Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                         |
|                                                |   | Public Service Company of New Mexico                                                                                                                                          |

----
N. Y. SUPERIOR COURT.

#### John H. Pake agt. Arthur Proal.

*Examination of a party l fore trial—mode of procedure to compel a party to appear for examination—construction of sections*873, 874 *and*875 *of the Code of Omtt Procedure.*

The summons resorted to under the old Code, for the purpose of bringing a party into court for examination, having been superseded by the subpoena substituted by the Code of Civil Procedure, and the requirement of a subpoena having in turn been abrogated, nothing more is now necessary than service of the order and affidavit as prescribed by section 875.

If a party has appeared in the action, the service of a copy of the order and of the affidavit upon which it was granted upon his attorney is sufficient. If a party has not appeared in the action, the papers must be served upon him as directed by the order. . If no action is pending, they must be personally served upon each of the persons named therein as expected adverse parties.

*Special*Term, October, 1877.

Freedman, *J.*

Section 874, as originally enacted as part of the Code of Remedial Justice, provided that upon the application of the person desiring to take deposition, the judge must also issue a subpoena, directed to the person to be examined, requiring him to attend at the time and place specified in the order granted under section 873. It further provided, that if the person so subpoenaed fails to obey the subpoena, his attendance may be compelled and he may be punished in like manner, and the proceedings thereon are the same as if he failed to obey a subpoena issued from the court in which the action is pending, &c. The legislature of 1877 *94amended the section by striking from it the requirement of a subpoena, and by directing that if the party or person served with the order fails to obey the same, his attendance may be compelled and he may be punished, in like manner as if he failed to obey a subpoena issued from the court.

The mode of the service of the order is prescribed by section 875. If a party has appeared in the action, the service of a copy of the order and of the affidavit upon which it was granted upon his attorney, in like manner as a paper in the action, is sufficient. If a party has not appeared in the action, the papers must be served upon him, as directed by the order. If no action is pending .they must be personally served upon each of the persons named therein as expected adverse parties. The summons resorted to under the old Code for the purpose of bringing a party into court for examination having been superseded by the subpoena substituted by the Code of Remedial Justice, and the requirement of a subpoena having in turn been abrogated, nothing more is now necessary than service as prescribed by section 875. The motion to dismiss the proceedings for want of a summons must be denied, and the defendant required to appear for examination.
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, October 24, 1995 (133), Para 133.17 Federal Securities Litigation Reform]
[Page 1584]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.133.17  federal securities litigation reform

  On motion of Mr. BLILEY, by unanimous consent, the bill (H.R. 1058) to 
reform Federal securities litigation, and for other purposes; together 
with the amendments of the Senate thereto, was taken from the Speaker's 
table.
  When on motion of Mr. BLILEY, it was,
  Resolved, That the House disagree to the amendments of the Senate and 
ask a conference with the Senate on the disagreeing votes of the two 
Houses thereon.
  Thereupon, the SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. FOLEY, by unanimous consent, 
announced the appointment of the following Members as managers on the 
part of the House at said conference:

  From the Committee on Commerce, for consideration of the House bill, 
and the Senate amendment, and modifications committed to conference:
  Messrs. Bliley, Tauzin, Fields of Texas, Cox of California, White, 
Dingell, Markey, Bryant of Texas, and Ms. Eshoo.
  As additional conferees from the Committee on the Judiciary, for 
consideration of the House bill, and the Senate amendment, and 
modifications committed to conference:
  Messrs. Hyde, McCollum, and Conyers.

  Ordered, That the Clerk notify the Senate thereof.
```
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.309 What are the employer's responsibilities with respect to the SAP's directions for follow-up tests? ( a ) As the employer, you must carry out the SAP's follow-up testing requirements. You may not allow the employee to continue to perform safety-sensitive functions unless follow-up testing is conducted as directed by the SAP.
( b ) You should schedule follow-up tests on dates of your own choosing, but you must ensure that the tests are unannounced with no discernable pattern as to their timing, and that the employee is given no advance notice.
( c ) You cannot substitute any other tests (*e.g.,* those carried out under the random testing program) conducted on the employee for this follow-up testing requirement.
( d ) You cannot count a follow-up test that has been cancelled as a completed test. A cancelled follow-up test must be recollected.
Exhibit 99.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc.
("PNBC") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Todd D.
Fanning, Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer of PNBC, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:


(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         PNBC.




/s/ Todd D. Fanning
----------------------------------------
Todd D. Fanning
Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer

August 12, 2002


                                       17