alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Dan [mailto:head_geekster@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 5:13 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

To Whom it may concern, 

I do not want you to tell me how to control my 401k nor do I want it in the hands of 

politicians. Where does this end? If there is any hint this is going to happen I can 

guarantee you that I will withdraw all of my funds from my 401k and pay the penalty. I 

can and should be allowed to control my own future. 

Dan 

 

-------------------------------- 

"Aspire to inspire before you expire."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET, STATEMENT OF INCOME, STATEMENT OF RETAINED EARNINGS AND STATEMENT OF CASH
FLOWS CONTAINED IN FORM 10-K OF COMMONWEALTH GAS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      280,280
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          87,036
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        56,692
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 197,019
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 621,027
<COMMON>                                        71,425
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      234,982
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              5,381
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 311,788
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            98,500
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              53,270
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    3,650
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 153,819
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  621,027
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      291,006
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             7,353
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     262,083
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     269,436
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         21,570
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               1,075
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  22,645
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        11,540
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,105
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   11,105
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        14,285
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        8,390
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          14,264
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC, individually and as successor in interest to 

YARDLEY OF LONDON, INC., YARDLEY OF LONDON, LTD., and

YARDLEY OF LONDON (U.S.), LLC.,

Appellant,

v.

JAMES MURRAY, individually and as Personal Representative of the 

Estate of JOAN MURRAY, decedent, CHANEL O., CHANEL, INC., 

CONOPCO, INC., individually and as successor in interest to

CHESEBROUGH PONDS, INC. and FABERGE LTD., CYPRUS AMAX 

MINEALS COMPANY, individually and as successor to METROPOLITAN 

TALC COMPANY, SIERRA TALC COMPANY, and UNITED TALC 

COMPANY, ESTEE LAUDER INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC. f/k/a

LUZENAC AMERICA INC., UNITED SIERRA TALC CO., CYPRUS AMAX 

MINERALS COMPANY, IMERYS MINERALS USA, INC., IMERYS USA, 

INC., IMI FABI (DIANA) LLC, PROCTOR & GAMBLE PRODUCTIONS, 

INC. as successor in interest to COTY, INC., YARDLEY OF LONDON, 

INC., YARDLEY OF LONDON LTD., and YARDLEY OF LONDON (U.S.) 

LLC, PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, IKNC., REVLON, INC. and 

WHITTAKER CLARK & DANIELS, INC.,

Appellees.

No. 4D19-3308

[May 7, 2020]

Non-final appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial 

Circuit, Broward County; Martin J. Bidwill, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE18-

0271746.

Carol M. Rooney and Adam M. Topel of Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig, 

LLP, Tampa, for appellant.

Rebecca S. Vinocur of Rebecca S. Vinocur, P.A., Coral Gables, and 

Daniel Woodard of Phillips & Paolicelli, LLP, New York New York, Pro Hac 

Vice for Appellee James Murray.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
2

DAMOORGIAN, FORST and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
###### Editorial Note on Part 385

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 385.419 How long is a safety permit effective?

Unless suspended or revoked, a safety permit (other than a temporary safety permit) is effective for two years, except that:

(a) A safety permit will be subject to revocation if a motor carrier fails to submit a renewal application (Form MCSA-1, the URS online application) in accordance with the schedule set forth for filing Form MCSA-1 in part 390, subpart E, of this subchapter; and

(b) An existing safety permit will remain in effect pending FMCSA's processing of an application for renewal if a motor carrier submits the required application (Form MCSA-1) in accordance with the schedule set forth in part 390, subpart E, of this subchapter.

[80 FR 63708, Oct. 21, 2015]

###### Effective Date Note

#### Effective Date Note:

At 82 FR 5305, Jan. 17, 2017, § 385.419 was suspended, effective Jan. 14, 2017.
EXHIBIT 32.1


























Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350


(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, of Britton & Koontz Capital Corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), I, W. Page Ogden, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:







(1)
the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




















Date: May 14, 2010                                                              /s/ W. Page Ogden


W. Page Ogden


Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.401 How does the Department notify employers and the public about a PIE? ( a ) The Department maintains a document called the “List of Excluded Drug and Alcohol Service Agents.” This document may be found on the Department's web site (*http://www.transportation.gov/odapc*) . You may also request a copy of the document from ODAPC.
( b ) When the Director issues a PIE, he or she adds to the List the name and address of the service agent, and any other persons or organizations, to whom the PIE applies and information about the scope and duration of the PIE.
( c ) When a service agent ceases to be subject to a PIE, the Director removes this information from the List.
( d ) The Department also publishes a Federal Register notice to inform the public on any occasion on which a service agent is added to or taken off the List.
[65 FR 79526, Dec. 19, 2000, as amended at 82 FR 52247, Nov. 13, 2017]
Convoys truck equipment out of Iraq
 By Army Spc. Anthony T Zane , American Forces Press Service
  
 CONTINGENCY OPERATING BASE ADDER, Iraq (October 28, 2011) — The number of convoys leaving Iraq is growing each day as Operation New Dawn nears the end of its mission.  October has been a busy month here, said Army Staff Sgt. Erick Torres, convoy commander, 233rd Transportation Company, as many military units on the base are packing up and sending their equipment back home. “The most challenging part of this job is loading the vehicles,” said Torres, who hails from Phenix City, Ala. Convoys of vehicles and equipment, he said, are being packed up and shipped out in preparation to exit Iraq. Flatbed trucks carrying Humvees, tanks and mine-resistant, ambush-protected vehicles are backed up to a ramp where the vehicles are carefully loaded. Once the cargo is loaded onto the trucks and the paperwork is complete, Torres said, the convoy is assembled at a staging area to await departure. Meanwhile, tons of equipment needs to be shipped out before the year’s end, Torres said, so soldiers and civilian contractors work long hours to ensure all equipment is packed properly and ready for transit. Part of a convoy commander’s job, Torres said, is identifying vehicles and equipment by serial number and matching them against unit rosters before they are shipped. It makes for long days, but it is a necessary part of the process, he added.
American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations

EXECUTIVE COUNCIL.

FERMION © g15 Sixteenth Street, N.W. RICHARD L. TRUMKA ELIZABETH H. SHULER ARLENE HOLT BAKER
Washington, D.C. 20008 PRESIDENT SECRETARY-TREASURER EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
(202) 637-5000
www. aficio.org Gerald W. McEntee Michael Sacco Frank Hurt Patricia Friend

Michael Goodwin Wiliam Lucy Robert A. Scardelleti R. Thomas Buffenbarger
Michael J. Sullivan Harold Schaitberger Edwin D. Hill Joseph J. Hunt
Clyde Rivers Cecil Roberts William Burrus Leo W. Gerard
James Williams Vincent Gibtin William Hite John Gage

Larry Cohen Warren George Gregory J. Junemann Laura Rico

Robbie Sparks Nancy Wohtforth James C. Little Capt. John Prater
Rose Ann DeMoro Mark H. Ayers Richard P. Hughes Jr. Fred Redmond
Matthew Loeb Randi Weingarten Rogelio “Roy A. Flores Fredric V. Rolando
Diann Woodard Patrick D. Finley Maicolm B. Futhey Jr. Newton B, Jones

D. Michael Langtord Robert McElrath Roberta Reardon DeMaurice F. Smith
Baldemar Velasquez John W. Wilhelm Ken Howard James Boland
Bruce R. Smith Bob King General Holiefield Lee A. Saunders
James Andrews Maria Elena Durazo

Submitted vie email to: e-ORI@dol.gov

February 9, 2011

Office of Regulations and Interpretations
Employee Benefits Security Administration
Attn: Fiduciary Definition Hearing

Room N-5655

U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20210

Re: _ Fiduciary Definition Hearing—Request to Testify and Issue Outline
Ladies and Gentlemen:

As set forth in the Notice of Hearing issued by the Department (76 Fed. Reg. 2142,
January 12, 2011), the AFL-CIO submits this written request to be heard at the public hearing

scheduled to begin on March 1, 2011 and an outline of the issues to be discussed.

If you have any questions about the enclosed outline or need any additional information,
please do not hesitate to contact me at (202) 637-5169.

Sincerely,
Karin S.F
Benefits and Social Insurance Policy Specialist


Il.

Il.

Iv.

Employee Benefits Security Administration
U.S. Department of Labor

Public Hearing on Fiduciary Definition
March 1, 2011

Issue Outline for AFL-CIO Testimony
Support the Proposed Definition

A. Appropriate to Broaden Scope of Covered Advice
B. Modification of Existing Five-Part Test Is In Keeping with Statute

Distribution Recommendations Should Be Included as Investment Advice

Suggested Clarifications and Modifications

A. Professionals Acting within the Scope of Their Professions Should Not Be
Considered to be Providing Investment Advice

B. The Limitation in Proposed Section 2510.3-21(c)(2)(i) Should Be Narrowed to
Exclude Participants

Conclusion
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 9:13 AM 

To: Wayland, Robertj; Fellner, Christian; Johnson, Mary 

Subject: FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Carbon Pollution Guidelines for Existing Power Plants: 

Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Stationary 

Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units 

Hi, 

Attached is the handout from this meeting. 

Regards, 

Cortney 

<< 2060AR33_2014_04_30_GHGExisitng_AHAM_Handout.pdf >> 

-----Original Appointment----- 

From: Echols, Mabel E. 

Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Carbon Pollution Guidelines for Existing Power Plants: Emission 

Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility 

Generating Units 

When: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 10:00 AM-10:30 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & 

Canada). 

Where: Room 10103 New Executive Office Building 

This meeting was requested by Robert McArver, AHAM.
From: Elizabeth Lewis [mailto:regentsdrive@aol.com] 

Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 12:51 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Cc: singletarym@washpost.com

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Dear Mr. Perez,

Investing retirees' money should always be in the shareholder's best interest. I know this doesn't always 

happen. One other issue seems to be equally important: security of the money being invested. As you 

know the FDIC was created because so many people lost their life savings when the stock market 

crashed in 1929. Now bank savings accounts are insured by the FDIC. There is no similar insurance for 

security investments. I think many people invest their money in securities because the banks pay very 

little interest on money in savings accounts. Why can't a Federal organization insure at least the principle 

being invested? For retirees who run out of money there are no loans such as tuition loans for students. 

The retirees are on their own. 

Thank you for asking for comments.

Sincerely,

Elizabeth S. Lewis
# Feb. 24: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL in Syria and Iraq

/ Published Feb. 24, 2015

February 24, 2015

Release # 20150224FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE       

**SOUTHWEST ASIA** — On Feb. 23, U.S. and Coalition military forces continued toattack ISIL terrorists in Syria, using attack, fighter, bomber and remotelypiloted aircraft to conduct 16 airstrikes. Separately, U.S. and Coalitionmilitary forces conducted five airstrikes in Iraq, using attack, fighter andremotely piloted aircraft against ISIL terrorists. All strikes took placebetween 8 a.m., Feb. 23, and 8 a.m., Feb. 24, local time.

The following is a summary of the strikes conducted since the last pressrelease:

Syria
      - Near Al Hasakah, 10 airstrikes struck nine ISIL tactical units anddestroyed two ISIL vehicles.
      - Near Kobani, six airstrikes struck an ISIL large tactical unit,three ISIL tactical units, two ISIL fighting positions and destroyed three ISIL fighting positions, an ISIL checkpointand an ISIL vehicle.

Iraq
      - Near Al Asad, three airstrikes struck an ISIL tactical unit, an ISILfighting position and an ISIL IED location.
      - Near Fallujah, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL heavy machine gun.
      - Near Hit in Al Anbar Province, an airstrike stuck an ISIL tacticalunit.

As a correction to yesterday's airstrike press release, the followingstrikes took place between 8a.m., Feb. 22, and 8 a.m., Feb. 23, local time.These airstrikes were inadvertently omitted from yesterday's release.
      - Near Al Asad, an airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit.
      - Near Al Hasakah, an airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit.

Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned tobase safely.

The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, theoperation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose toIraq, Syria, the region, and the wider international community. Thedestruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terroristgroup's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nationswhich have conducted airstrikes in Iraq include the U.S., Australia,Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Netherlands, and the United Kingdom.Coalition nations which have conducted airstrikes in Syria include the U.S.,Bahrain, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1436.html[7/23/2015 11:00:38 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvn-geww

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1436

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Doug Haskin

General Comment

Please Federal Government..keep your hands OFF my 401k and retirement plans. I'v worked my whole life to

 this moment where my retirement is within my grasp and I do not need anyone but myself managing it.
#### William Doyle, *Respondent, v.*Charles H. Mead and another, *Appellants.*

— Judgment of County Court affirmed with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted February 2 , 201 8 *

Decided June 22 , 2018

Before

DIANE P. WOOD

, C hief Judge

MICHAEL S. KANNE

, Circuit Judge

DIANE S. SYKES

, Circuit Judge

No. 17

- 3011

FELIX J. BRUETTE, JR.

, Plaintiff

- Appellant

,

v

.

RYAN ZINKE, United States Secretary of the Interior, Defendant

- Appellee

. Appeal from the

United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Wisconsin

.

No. 17 C 286

William C. Griesbach

, Chief Judge

.

O R D E R

Felix Bruette appeals from an order dismissing his second law suit against the Secretary of the Interior seeking a court order enforc ing an 1856 t reaty between the Stockbridge and Munsee Indians and the United States and recogni zing his claim of

* We agreed to decide the case without oral argument because the briefs and record adequately present the facts and legal arguments, and oral argument would not significantly aid the court. F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 34(a)(2)(C). NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1No. 17

- 301 1 Page 2

tribal rights under that t reaty. Bruette’s first suit was dismissed for lack of subject

matter jurisdiction

. ( The judge identified other flaws as wel l: the suit was both untimely and raised only a nonjusticiable political question. ) Bruette appeal ed , but his two

- page brief did not address the substance of the district court’s decision or otherwise develop an argument, so we dismissed the appeal for non compliance with Rule 28(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Bruette v. Jewell , 638 F. App ’ x 528 (Mem.) (7th Cir. 2016).

About a year later

, Bruette filed another lawsuit against the Secretary seeking to litigate t h e same dispute about his claim ed treaty rights. The same district judge again

dismissed the suit for lack of subject

- matter jurisdiction , and Bruette a ppealed . Th e Secretary urges us to dismiss this second appeal because it suffers from the same defect as the first: noncompliance with Rule 28(a). Alternatively, the Secretary argues that Bruette’s second suit is blocked by preclusion principles , sovereign immunity, the statute of limitations, and because it raises a nonjust iciable political question.

We agree that the appeal must be dismissed for noncompliance with Rule 28(a). The argument section of Bruette’s brie f contains just three spar s e sentences announcing that he disagrees with the district court and that his civil rights have been violated. Although Bruet te is representing himself, all appellants

— even those proceeding pro

se

— must file a brief that co ntain s more than just a generalized assertion of error.

Anderson v. Hardman , 241 F.3d 544, 545 (7th Cir. 2001) (explaining that pro se filings are construed liberally, “but still we must be able to discern cogent arguments in any appellate brief, even one from a pro se litigant”). Bruette ha s failed to develop any argument for why the district court was wrong to dismiss his latest complaint

. Accordingly, t here is nothing for us to review . T he appe al is D ISMISSED

.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEffects of engine emissions from high-speed civil transport aircraft: A two-dimensional modeling study, part 2The AER two-dimensional chemistry-transport model is used to study the effect of supersonic and subsonic aircraft operation in the 2010 atmosphere on stratospheric ozone (O3). The results show that: (1) the calculated O3 response is smaller in the 2010 atmosphere compared to previous calculations performed in the 1980 atmosphere; (2) with the emissions provided, the calculated decrease in O3 column is less than 1 percent; and (3) the effect of model grid resolution on O3 response is small provided that the physics is not modified.Document ID19910009177Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsKo, Malcolm K. W.*(Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc. Cambridge, MA, United States)*Weisenstein, Debra K.*(Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc. Cambridge, MA, United States)*Sze, Nein Dak*(Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc. Cambridge, MA, United States)*Shia, Run-Lie*(Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc. Cambridge, MA, United States)*Rodriguez, Jose M.*(Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc. Cambridge, MA, United States)*Heisey, Curtis*(Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc. Cambridge, MA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1991Subject CategoryEnvironment PollutionReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:4346-PT-2NASA-CR-4346-PT-2Accession Number91N18490Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-18460PROJECT: RTOP 505-69-61-04Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910009177.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024