alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 375.709 If a shipment is totally lost or destroyed, what charges may I collect at delivery? ( a ) You are forbidden from collecting, or requiring an individual shipper to pay, any freight charges (including any charges for accessorial or terminal services) when a household goods shipment is *totally lost or destroyed* in transit. The following two conditions also apply: ( 1 ) You must collect any specific valuation charge due.
( 2 ) You may disregard paragraph (a) of this section if loss or destruction was due to an act or omission of the individual shipper.
( b ) The individual shipper's rights are in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other rights the individual shipper may have with respect to a shipment of household goods you or your agent(s) totally lost or destroyed in transit. This applies whether or not the individual shipper exercises its rights provided in paragraph (a) of this section.
§ 380.113 Employer responsibilities. ( a ) No motor carrier shall: ( 1 ) Allow, require, permit or authorize an individual to operate an LCV unless he/she meets the requirements in §§ 380.203 or 380.205 and has been issued the LCV driver-training certificate described in § 380.401. This provision does not apply to individuals who are eligible for the substitute for driver training provision in § 380.111.
( 2 ) Allow, require, permit, or authorize an individual to operate an LCV which the LCV driver-training certificate, CDL, and CDL endorsement(s) do not authorize the driver to operate. This provision applies to individuals employed by or under contract to the motor carrier.
( b ) A motor carrier that employs or has under contract LCV drivers shall provide evidence of the certifications required by § 380.401 or § 380.111 of this part when requested by an authorized FMCSA, State, or local official in the course of a compliance review.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 273 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 89
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 273

                          [Report No. 107-261]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 2647) making appropriations for the Legislative Branch for 
   the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

             October 31 (legislative day, October 30), 2001

    Ms. Pryce, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 2647) making appropriations for the Legislative Branch for 
   the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
2647) making appropriations for the Legislative Branch for the fiscal 
year ending September 30, 2002, and for other purposes. All points of 
order against the conference report and against its consideration are 
waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.

                                                  House Calendar No. 89

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 273

                          [Report No. 107-261]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 2647) making appropriations for the Legislative Branch for 
   the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 31, 2001

         Referred to the House Calendar and order to be printed
```
#### § 565.1 Purpose and scope.

This part specifies the format, content and physical requirements for a vehicle identification number (VIN) system and its installation to simplify vehicle identification information retrieval and to increase the accuracy and efficiency of vehicle recall campaigns.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/19/15 4:36 PM

Received: July 13, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jyh-r60q

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2191

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: John McGee

General Comment

I am strongly opposed to ANY government involvement in my retirement planning.
H. Res. 168

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 20, 2001.

Whereas Native Americans have given much to this country;

Whereas an emphasis on freedom, justice, patriotism, and

representative government have always been elements of

Native American culture;

Whereas Native Americans have shown their willingness to

fight and die for this Nation in foreign lands;

Whereas Native Americans honor the American flag at every

powwow and at many gatherings and remember all veterans through song, music, and dance;

Whereas Native Americans honor, through song, the men and

women of this country who have fought for freedom;

Whereas Native Americans love the land that has nurtured

their parents, grandparents, and unnamed elders since

the beginning of their recorded history; and

Whereas Native Americans honor the Earth that has brought

life to the people since time immemorial: Now, therefore,

be it

Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that the Nation’s schools should honor Native Ameri-
2

•HRES 168 EH

cans for their contributions to American history, culture, and

education.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[109th Congress Public Law 100]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ100.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 2170]]

Public Law 109-100
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To extend the special postage stamp for breast cancer research for 2 
               years. <<NOTE: Nov. 11, 2005 -  [S. 37]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-YEAR EXTENSION OF POSTAGE STAMP FOR BREAST CANCER RESEARCH.

    Section 414(h) of title 39, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``2005'' and inserting ``2007''.

    Approved November 11, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 37:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

SENATE REPORTS: No. 109-140 (Comm. on Homeland Security and Governmental 
Affairs).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            Sept. 27, considered and passed Senate.
            Oct. 27, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Willis, Fitzpatrick and Overton Argued at Salem, Virginia

GEORGE ANDREW HOLLAND

v. Record No. 0171-95-3 MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY JUDGE JERE M. H. WILLIS, JR. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA APRIL 23, 1996

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF MARTINSVILLE Frank I. Richardson, Jr., Judge Vikram Kapil, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Richard H. Rizk, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General; Steven A. Witmer, Assistant Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

On appeal from his conviction of brandishing a firearm in violation of Code § 18.2-282, George Andrew Holland contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. During the trial, a witness for the Commonwealth testified that Holland pulled a gun from his car and threatened her outside of the Corner Market. She testified that she told him, "You've done killed before, but you're not going to do nothing to me. I'm going to take you uptown to a white man." Holland objected to the witness' statement, arguing that any probative value it had was far outweighed by its prejudicial effect on the jury. His objection was overruled. He did not ask for a cautionary

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.- 2 - instruction or move for a mistrial. At the close of all the evidence, Holland moved for a mistrial, contending that the witness' statement concerning a prior unspecified killing was inflammatory and prejudicial. The

trial court denied the motion for a mistrial. Holland contends that this denial was error because the testimony was "illegal evidence [that] was so impressive that it probably remained on the minds of the jury and influenced their verdict." Montgomery

v. Commonwealth , 214 Va. 343, 345, 200 S.E.2d 577, 579 (1973).

We do not reach the merits of whether the trial court erred in denying Holland's motion for a mistrial because the motion was not made timely. [I]f a defendant wishes to take advantage on appeal of some incident he regards as objectionable enough to warrant a mistrial, he must make his motion timely or else be deemed to have waived his objection. Making a timely motion for mistrial means making the motion "when the objectional words were spoken."

Yeatts v. Commonwealth , 242 Va. 121, 137, 410 S.E.2d 254, 264 (1991) (citations omitted), cert. denied , 503 U.S. 946 (1992). "A motion for mistrial is required to preserve such an issue for appeal even if an objection is made to the conduct or comments and is overruled by the trial court." Parker v. Commonwealth , 14 Va. App. 592, 596, 421 S.E.2d 450, 453 (1992). Because Holland failed to move timely and specifically for a mistrial when the objectionable evidence was presented, he waived any objection to it on appeal. Rule 5A:18.- 3 - The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<CIK>         0000707604
<NAME>        Britton & Koontz Capital Corp
<MULTIPLIER>  1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          Jan-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            Sep-30-2000
<CASH>                                     5,612,155
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                   155,635,915
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                4,148,565
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                    54,791,289
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                      54,349,567
<LOANS>                                  161,306,902
<ALLOWANCE>                                1,026,301
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           239,676,576
<DEPOSITS>                               181,527,542
<SHORT-TERM>                              29,918,190
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        3,780,886
<LONG-TERM>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                   4,417,660
<OTHER-SE>                                16,832,298
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           239,676,576
<INTEREST-LOAN>                           10,177,075
<INTEREST-INVEST>                          3,044,386
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                          13,221,461
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                         5,301,090
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         6,307,864
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                      6,913,597
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                250,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                            5,362,232
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            2,719,494
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                 1,811,743
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                               1,811,743
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.33
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  8.27
<LOANS-NON>                                  778,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 358,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             835,576
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                128,812
<RECOVERIES>                                  69,538
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                          1,026,301
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            0






</TABLE>
Exhibit (12)

NORWEST FINANCIAL, INC.

COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

|                                                              |  | Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
1999 |         | Years Ended December 31,
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------ | ------- | ------------------------
|
|
|Net income                                                    |  | $                                    | 201,054 |                         
|                                                              |  |                                      |         |                         
|Add:                                                          |  |                                      |         |                         
|Fixed charges:                                                |  |                                      |         |                         
|Interest including amortization of debt expense               |  |                                      | 381,620 |                         
|One-third of rentals*                                         |  |                                      | 10,163  |                         
|                                                              |  |                                      |         |                         
|Total fixed charges                                           |  |                                      | 391,783 |                         
|                                                              |  |                                      |         |                         
|Provision for income taxes                                    |  |                                      | 112,329 |                         
|                                                              |  |                                      |         |                         
|Total net earnings, fixed charges and income taxes"Earnings" |  | $                                    | 705,166 |                         
|                                                              |  |                                      |         |                         
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                            |  |                                      | 1.80    |                         
|                                                              |  |                                      |         |                         

---
1210-AB32-2-1186.html[7/24/2015 7:24:58 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvr-o6vs

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1680

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

We can plan our own retirement. Though it may be hard for the federal government to understand, we CAN and

 have planned our own retirement. We do not need your help. We, like most all Americans ARE smart enough to

 figure out our retirement plans. The Federal government is not smarter than the individual. We don't need your

 help, thank you. Do not pass any more (over-reach, big government) regulations. A Republic is local control, not

 the Democracy of big federal government over-reach. In other words, let US do our job w/o interference from

 Washington who does not know US like we know US. When it's our future, believe me, WE know what to do

 and can figure it out. We don't need BIG BROTHER government stepping in and taking our autonomy away.

 Please stay out of this. Let us do what WE want and need. WE know what that is!!
California Home ARB: Home Search Site Map Software ContactUs AQD: Home



### Select 8 Summary FAQs PM2.5 PM10 Natl Annual Std Design Value National 24-Hour Design Value High National 24-Hour Average Monitoring Sites 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 Ventura County El Rio-Rio Mesa School #2 8.7 9.0 17 17 56.3 45.9 Ojai-Ojai Avenue * * * * 17.1 * Piru-3301 Pacific Avenue 8.6 8.2 17 18 * * Simi Valley-Cochran Street 8.9 9.1 18 20 39.5 41.1 Thousand Oaks-Moorpark Road 9.0 9.1 20 20 * *

Notes: PM10 statistics may include data that are related to an exceptional event

. * There was insufficient (or no) data available to dete rmine the value.

Go to: Data Statistics Home Page Select 8 Summary Start Pag e
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1250

BRUCE M. CROW,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 95-1855)

Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: July 30, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce M. Crow, Appellant Pro Se. Gary R. Allen, Kevin Martin

Brown, Tax Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the tax court's order granting summary

judgment to the Appellee. We have reviewed the record and the tax

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the tax court. Crow v. Commissioner,

No. 95-1855 (Tax Ct. Dec. 7, 1995). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Thomas McBride, Deceased.—

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements. Mem. by

Learned, P. J.
1210-AB32-2-1159 html[7/24/2015 7:01:04 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvr-iz25

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1653

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: John Hines

General Comment

You better keep your hands off my IRA and 401k retirement plans. Otherwise, I will vote to fire

 all of you from office.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 286 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 95
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 286

                          [Report No. 107-287]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2500) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, 
Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and related agencies for the fiscal 
        year ending September 30, 2002, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 13, 2001

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2500) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, 
Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and related agencies for the fiscal 
        year ending September 30, 2002, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
2500) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, Justice, 
and State, the Judiciary, and related agencies for the fiscal year 
ending September 30, 2002, and for other purposes. All points of order 
against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. 
The conference report shall be considered as read.

                                                  House Calendar No. 95

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 286

                          [Report No. 107-287]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2500) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, 
Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and related agencies for the fiscal 
        year ending September 30, 2002, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 13, 2001

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```