alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002In connection with the Quarterly Report of Max & Erma’s Restaurants, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending August 6, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, William C. Niegsch, Jr., the Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ William C. Niegsch, Jr.     William C. Niegsch, Jr.Executive Vice President andChief Financial OfficerSeptember 13, 2006This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed“filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report,irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
27
#### § 236.9 Selection of circuits through indicating or annunciating instruments.

Signal control and electric locking circuits shall not be selected through the contacts of instruments designed primarily for indicating or annunciating purposes in which an indicating element attached to the armature is arranged so that it can in itself cause improper operation of the armature.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                              COLLAGEN CORPORATION

                   Statement Regarding Weighted Average Common
                      and Common Equivalent Shares Used in
                         Computation of Per Share Income

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended June 30,                                           1997          1996          1995
-------------------------------------------------------    ----------    ----------    ----------
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
<S>                                                        <C>           <C>           <C>       
Net income                                                 $    7,371    $   26,652    $    8,760
                                                           ==========    ==========    ==========
Primary
Common Stock                                                    8,804         8,915         9,270
Stock Options (treasury stock method)                             126           160           190
                                                           ----------    ----------    ----------
Weighted average number of common and common equivalent
         shares outstanding                                     8,930         9,075         9,460
                                                           ==========    ==========    ==========

Earnings per share - primary                               $      .83    $     2.94    $      .93
                                                           ==========    ==========    ==========
Fully Diluted

Common Stock                                                    8,804         8,915         9,270
Stock Options (treasury stock method)                             128           189           211
                                                           ----------    ----------    ----------
Weighted average number of common and common equivalent
         shares outstanding                                     8,932         9,104         9,481
                                                           ==========    ==========    ==========
Earnings per share - fully diluted                                NA*           NA*           NA*
                                                           ==========    ==========    ==========
</TABLE>


----------

*  Not applicable - dilution less than 3%



                                    Page 72
From: Dustin Stanley [mailto:Dustin@askmattdicken.com] 

Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 3:32 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Fiduciary rule

I am already a Fiduciary and act in the best interest of my clients, however from everything that I have 

read about this rule it feels like this is going to make a mess of our industry. I work with mostly middle 

America that doesn’t have a million dollars to invest and they are the ones that NEED the advice of 

someone that knows how to make their money last. If all products paid the same amount in fees then 

that is like comparing Apple’s to Oranges. You can’t charge and make the same amount off of something

that doesn’t carry a fee on it each year the same as you would a mutual fund or something that has 

reoccurring fees. This rule is absolutely absurd and HAS to be changed. I can’t believe that you are trying 

to alienate the middle class from being able to afford sound advice. 

Sincerely worried,

Dustin Stanley

502.412.3354 x306

Dustin Stanley

Financial Advisor

P: 502-412-3354 | ext. 306

F: 502-327-8566

A: 9710 Park Plaza Avenue

Suite 110 | Louisville, KY 40241

E: Dustin@askmattdicken.com

Visit us on the web: AskMattDicken

Strategic Wealth Designers, LLC, is a registered investment adviser in the 

State of Kentucky and Indiana. 

The adviser may not transact business in states where it is not appropriately

registered, excluded or exempted from registration. Individualized responses 

to persons that involve either the effecting of transaction in securities, or 

the rendering of personalized investment advice for compensation, will not be 

made without registration or exemption.
# 2023

# 2022

# 2021

# 2020

# 2019

# 2018

# 2017

# 2016

# 2015

# 2014

# 2013

# 2012

# 2011

# 2010

# 2009

# 2008

# 2007

# 2006

# 2005

# 2004

# 2003

# 2002

# 2001

# 2000

# 1999

# 1998

# 1997

# 1996

# 1995

# 1994

# 1993

# 1992
§ 240.217 Time limitations for making determinations. ( a ) A railroad shall not certify or recertify a person as a qualified locomotive engineer in any class of train or engine service, if the railroad is making a determination concerning: ( 1 ) Eligibility and the eligibility data being relied on was furnished more than 366 days before the date of the railroad's certification decision;
( 2 ) Visual and hearing acuity and the medical examination being relied on was conducted more than 450 days before the date of the railroad's recertification decision;
( 3 ) Demonstrated knowledge and the knowledge examination being relied on was conducted more than 366 days before the date of the railroad's certification decision;
( 4 ) Demonstrated knowledge and the knowledge examination being relied on was conducted more than 24 months before the date of the railroad's certification decision if the railroad administers a knowledge testing program pursuant to § 240.125 at intervals that do not exceed 24 months; or
( 5 ) Demonstrated performance skills and the performance skill testing being relied on was conducted more than 366 days before the date of the railroad's certification decision.
( b ) The time limitations of paragraph (a) of this section do not apply to a railroad that is making a certification decision in reliance on determinations made by another railroad in accordance with paragraph (c)(2) of this section, § 240.227, or § 240.229.
( c ) Except as provided in § 240.201 concerning implementation dates for initial certification decisions and paragraph (b) of this section, no railroad shall: ( 1 ) Certify a person as a qualified locomotive engineer for an interval of more than 36 months; or
( 2 ) Rely on a certification issued by another railroad that is more than 36 months old.
( d ) A railroad shall issue each person designated as a certified locomotive engineer a certificate that complies with § 240.223 no later than 30 days from the date of its decision to certify or recertify that person.
[56 FR 28254, June 19, 1991, as amended at 58 FR 19003, Apr. 9, 1993; 60 FR 53137, Oct. 12, 1995; 64 FR 60992, Nov. 8, 1999; 74 FR 68184, Dec. 23, 2009; 85 FR 81314, Dec. 15, 2020]
IV

House Calendar No. 117

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 322

[Report No. 107–351]

Providing for consideration of a joint resolution appointing the day for the

convening of the second session of the One Hundred Seventh Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 20 (legislative day, DECEMBER 19), 2001

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered

to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of a joint resolution appointing

the day for the convening of the second session of the

One Hundred Seventh Congress.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House a joint resolu3 tion appointing the day for the convening of the second

4 session of the One Hundred Seventh Congress. The joint

5 resolution shall be considered as read for amendment. The

6 previous question shall be considered as ordered on the

7 joint resolution to final passage without intervening mo-
2

HRES 322 RH

1 tion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and

2 controlled by the Majority Leader and the Minority Lead3 er or their designees; and (2) one motion to recommit.

House Calendar No. 117

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 322

[Report No. 107–351]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of a joint resolution appointing the day for the convening of the second

session of the One Hundred Seventh Congress.

DECEMBER 20 (legislative day, DECEMBER 19), 2001

Referred to the House Calendar and order to be printed
§ 174.61 Transport vehicles and freight containers on flat cars. ( a ) A transport vehicle, freight container, or package containing a hazardous material must be designed and loaded so that it will not become damaged to an extent that would affect its integrity under conditions normally incident to transportation. Each unit must be secured on a flatcar so that it cannot permanently change position during transit. Packages of hazardous materials contained therein must be loaded and braced as provided by §§ 174.101, 174.112, 174.115 and 174.55. Placards must be applied when prescribed by part 172 of this subchapter and part 174.
( b ) Except as specified in § 173.21, a truck body, trailer, or freight container equipped with heating or refrigerating equipment which has fuel or any article classed as a hazardous material may be loaded and transported on a flat car as part of a joint rail highway movement. The heating or refrigerating equipment is considered to be a part of the truck body or trailer and is not subject to any other requirements of this subchapter. The truck body, trailer, or freight container must be secured on the flatcar so that it cannot change position during transit.
[Amdt. 174-26, 41 FR 16092, Apr. 15, 1976, as amended by Amdt. 174-26A, 41 FR 40685, Sept. 20, 1976; Amdt. 174-38, 45 FR 32698, May 19, 1980; Amdt. 174-39, 45 FR 81572, Dec. 11, 1980; Amdt. 174-59, 51 FR 5974, Feb. 18, 1986; Amdt. 174-68, 57 FR 45464, Oct. 1, 1992; Amdt. 174-79, 59 FR 64744, Dec. 15, 1994]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1]

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Plasticon International Inc. (“Plasticon”) because Plasticon is delinquent on most of its required filings since November 1997.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company.

*Therefore, it is ordered,*                     pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on September 21, 2007, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on October 4, 2007.                

By the Commission.

J. Lynn Taylor,

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 07-4731 Filed 9-21-07; 1:52 pm]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
From: fepierro@cox.net [mailto:fepierro@cox.net] 

Sent: Monday, September 07, 2015 2:02 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Re: RIN-AB32

I strongly oppose Department of Labor's proposed rule to not allow the use of options in 

IRAs. I am a 74 year old senior and for many years I have been selling out of the money 

covered calls and occasionally secured puts on stocks I wish to own. The advantages 

of doing this in an IRA are obvious since it is generally less risky to keep expirations on 

trades within a year and therefore the gains are short term but not subject to ordinary 

income tax. I generally sell out of the money calls on stocks in which I have a profit as a 

means to both enhance yield and hedge my gain. If the stock gets called then neither the 

gain on sale nor the premium is subect to tax. That is an advantage that I can only have in 

an IRA and I would be extremely disappointed should I lose it. There are many areas of 

securities trading that the Government (ie:SEC) needs to address-this is not one of them.

Frank E. Pierro
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CORY MAURICE WILLIAMS, III,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 560 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of March, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 9, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-40271

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

OSVALDO REA-HERRERA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:04-CR-746-ALL 

--------------------

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Osvaldo Rea-Herrera (“Rea”) appeals the 46-month sentence

imposed following entry of his guilty plea to a charge of being

found illegally in the United States after he had been removed

subsequent to his conviction for an aggravated felony. Rea’s

sole issue on appeal is a challenge to the validity of

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), and the

use of his prior conviction to increase his sentence. Rea

asserts for the first time on appeal that the “felony” and
No. 05-40271

-2-

“aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are

unconstitutional because they are treated as sentencing factors

rather than as elements of the offense. Rea concedes that his

arguments are foreclosed by circuit precedent and admits that he

raises the arguments merely to preserve them for Supreme Court

review. 

As Rea concedes, his arguments are foreclosed. See United

States v. Izaguirre-Flores, 405 F.3d 270, 277-78 (5th Cir.),

cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 253 (2005); United States v. ManciaPerez, 331 F.3d 464, 470 (5th Cir. 2003). The Supreme Court in

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000), did not

overrule Almendarez-Torres, and we must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Mancia-Perez, 331 F.3d at 470 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). 

AFFIRMED.
§ 523.10 Heavy-duty trailers. ( a ) A trailer means a motor vehicle with or without motive power, designed for carrying cargo and for being drawn by another motor vehicle as defined in 49 CFR 571.3. For the purpose of this part, heavy-duty trailers include only those trailers designed to be drawn by a truck tractor excluding non-box trailers other than flatbed trailer, tanker trailers and container chassis and those that are coupled to vehicles exclusively by pintle hooks or hitches instead of a fifth wheel. Heavy-duty trailers may be divided into different types and categories as follows: ( 1 ) Box vans are trailers with enclosed cargo space that is permanently attached to the chassis, with fixed sides, nose, and roof. Tank trailers are not box vans.
( 2 ) Box van with front-mounted HVAC systems are refrigerated vans. Note that this includes systems that provide cooling, heating, or both. All other box vans are dry vans.
( 3 ) Trailers that are not box vans are non-box trailers. Note that the standards for non-box trailers in 49 CFR 535.5(e)(2) apply only to flatbed trailers, tank trailers, and container chassis.
( 4 ) Box van with a length greater than 50 feet are long box vans. Other box vans are short box vans.
( 5 ) The following types of equipment are not trailers: ( i ) Containers that are not permanently mounted on chassis.
( ii ) Dollies used to connect tandem trailers.
( iii ) Equipment that serves similar purposes but are not intended to be pulled by a tractor.
( b ) Heavy-duty trailers do not include trailers excluded in 49 CFR 535.3.
[81 FR 74237, Oct. 25, 2016]
1210-AB32-2-1498.html[7/26/2015 6:08:59 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwj-g5ux

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1994

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I do not want the government of the USA to confiscate my retirement account! I remember when IRAs first

 started and elders in my family said that if we did start saving for our own future, the government would figure

 out a way to take your money.

I guess they were right!

I started saving for retirement in the 1990s. I am now 51 and do not need the government to do it for me.

Keep your hands off my retirement!

I have been through the ringer over my years. I have seen the stock market blow up and the housing bubble burst.

I have seen too much to think that my government can manage my retirement!

Social Security will run out of money if they don't fix it. How in the world will the government manage my

 money if they cannot manage Social Security?

I think this is an overreach by our government, to take over the trillions of dollars that hard-working Americans

 have saved themselves! I have gone without and saved instead of living the high-life.

Keep your hands off my RETIREMENT!
1210-AB32-2-1603.html[7/26/2015 8:56:08 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jxx-1xfj

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2100

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: William Georgia

Address:

12551 SW 16 CT., C203

Pembroke Pines, FL, 33027

Email: Kirk.Georgia@gmail.com

Phone: 9542706393

General Comment

Stay out of my retirement decisions. CANCEL THIS RULE! YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO INTERFERE IN MY

 RETIREMENT DECISIONS!
Afghan forces learn air-to-ground integration
 By Staff Sgt. Elvis Umanzor , Army News Service
  Afghan National Army Soldiers conduct an air-to-ground integration practical exercise on Forward Operating Base Shank, Afghanistan, as U.S. Air Force Chief Master Sgt. Keith Hunt (left center) and Lt. Col. Mark Brown (right), both advisers to the Afghan air force, assist in the exercise. (Photo by Staff Sgt. Elvis Umanzor)
 **LOGAR PROVINCE, Afghanistan –** As U.S. forces prepare to leave Afghanistan, the Afghan Air Force and the Afghan National Army are integrating air and ground forces to conduct combat fire support and logistics missions as they continue to grow and lead operations. On Sept. 18, three Afghan National Army fire support officers and two staff officers with the 4th Infantry Brigade, 203rd Corps, conducted an air-to-ground integration, or AGI, exercise near Hunter Base in eastern Afghanistan. The Afghan National Army Soldiers successfully coordinated with two Afghan Mi-35 helicopters. They conducted live-fire drills, including how to abort a mission. The AGI exercise, part of a proof of concept initiative to certify Afghan air coordinators, allowed ANA Soldiers to communicate with the pilots and provide a safety net for the army and air force to work together in the same area of operation. “Currently, the Afghan security forces depend on the coalition forces to provide them air support,” said U.S. Air Force Lt. Col. Mark Brown, a NATO Air Training Command-Afghanistan adviser. “In 2015, (Afghan forces) are going to have to rely on their own assets to provide this type of support.” Brown and U.S Air Force Chief Master Sgt. Keith Hunt, 504th Expeditionary Air Support Operations Group, are helping to develop the curriculum to create a new Afghan Air Force career field: Afghan Tactical Air Coordinator. This is a critical point in the future of the Afghan military, said Brown. “They’ve shown and demonstrated their ability to do some of these missions on their own,” he added. “I think we have the capabilities - ANA and ANP (Afghan National Police) - to fight against the insurgents,” said ANA 2nd Lt. Nasrullah, a fire support officer with the 4th Infantry Brigade. “We had a (recent) operation with no U.S. support, and we were successful against the enemy.” “We are just there for guidance and assistance,” said U.S. Army 1st Lt. Robert Gordon, an adviser with 4th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, 3rd Infantry Division, who is partnered with Nasrullah and his team. “They are at the point where they can go out and do their missions on their own.”