alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1





      INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC  ACCOUNTING FIRM'S CONSENT

        We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-42543 dated August 30, 1991) pertaining to
the Cognitronics Corporation 1967 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the
Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-42544 dated August 30, 1991
and Form S-8 No. 333-05897 dated June 13, 1996) pertaining to the
Cognitronics Corporation 1990 Stock Option Plan, the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-05899 dated June 13, 1996) pertaining to
the Cognitronics Corporation Restricted Stock Plan and the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-118508 dated August 24, 2004) pertaining to
the Directors' Stock Option Plan of our report dated March 14, 2005, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Cognitronics
Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003.


/s/  Carlin, Charron & Rosen, LLP

Glastonbury, Connecticut
March 30, 2005
QuickLinks

|                                            |
|--------------------------------------------|
|                                            |  |
| Name                                       | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |
| Coherent (Deutschland), GmbH          | Germany |
| Coherent (U.K.) Ltd.             | United Kingdom |
| Coherent Japan KK.                    | Japan |
| Coherent GmbH                         | Germany |
| Coherent Investments, Inc.       | United States |
| Coherent Holding, GmbH                | Germany |
| Coherent (U.K.) Holdings, Ltd.   | United Kingdom |
| Coherent Finland, Oy.                 | Finland |
| Coherent Scotland, Ltd.          | Scotland |
| Coherent DEOS, LLC                    | United States |
| COHR International Finance C.V.       | The Netherlands |
| COHR International Trading C.V.       | The Netherlands |
| Coherent Europe B.V.             | The Netherlands |
| Coherent Asia                              | United States |
| Coherent (Beijing) Commercial Company Ltd. | China |
| Coherent Canada, Inc.                 | Canada |
| Coherent Singapore PTE Ltd.                | Singapore |
| Coherent (Thailand) Co., Ltd.              | Thailand |
| COHR Malaysia SDN. BHD                     | Malaysia |

|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |

SUBSIDIARIES
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 157

Expressing the condolences of the House of Representatives on the death

of the Honorable John Joseph Moakley, a Representative from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 6, 2001

Mr. MCGOVERN submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing the condolences of the House of Representatives

on the death of the Honorable John Joseph Moakley,

a Representative from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

1 Resolved, That the House has heard with profound

2 sorrow of the death of the Honorable John Joseph Moak3 ley, a Representative from the Commonwealth of Massa4 chusetts.

5 Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolu6 tions to the Senate and transmit a copy thereof to the

7 family of the deceased.
2

•HRES 157 ATH

1 Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it ad2 journ as a further mark of respect to the memory of the

3 deceased.

Æ
From: Chad Griffeth [mailto:cgriffeth@bemanaged.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 1:34 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Comment letter on Definition of Who Is a Fiduciary

BeManaged fully supports the proposed definition of who is "considered to be a 

'fiduciary' by reason of giving investment advice to an employee benefit plan or a plan's 

participants." The criticisms asserting the new definition will make it more difficult and 

expensive for small investors to receive advice is simply not true. The "fiduciary side" of 

the industry has provided process driven advice for years at a highly competitive cost to 

investors of all types for years. Our firm has done this for five years, benefiting investors 

of all sizes, and will continue as a committed fiduciary. Raising standards improves 

results, while the innovators of our industry find efficiencies to do so at a competitive 

price while adding value to investors as they prepare for the challenge of retiring with 

dignity. 

Sincerely, 

Chad Griffeth, AIF 

Co-Founder 

BeManaged 

P: 616.871.0751

T: 888.738.8780

F: 616.825.6149

Web: BeManaged.com

__________ 

This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) 

and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution 

is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient(s) please contact the sender by reply email and 

destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.

___________ 

 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
§ 512.3 Definitions. Whenever used in this part: ( a ) *Administrator* means the Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
( b ) *Chief Counsel* means the Chief Counsel of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
( c ) *Confidential business* information means trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is privileged or confidential, as described in 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4). ( 1 ) A *trade secret* is a secret, commercially valuable plan, formula, process, or device that is used for the making, preparing, compounding, or processing of trade commodities and that can be said to be the end product of either innovation or substantial effort.
( 2 ) Commercial or financial information is considered confidential if it has not been publicly disclosed and: ( i ) If the information was required to be submitted and its release is likely to impair the Government's ability to obtain necessary information in the future, or is likely to cause substantial harm to the competitive position of the person from whom the information was obtained; or
( ii ) if the information was voluntarily submitted and is the kind of information that is customarily not released to the public by the person from whom it was obtained.
( d ) NHTSA means the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
( e ) “ Substantial competitive harm ” includes “*significant competitive damage*” under Chapter 329 of Title 49 of the United States Code, Automobile Fuel Economy, 49 U.S.C. 32910(c).
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Monday, July 31, 1995 (105), Para 105.5 Communications]
[Page 1222]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.105.5  communications

  Executive and other communications, pursuant to clause 2, rule XXIV, 
were referred as follows:

       1281. A letter from the Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty 
     Affairs, Department of State, transmitting copies of 
     international agreements, other than treaties, entered into 
     by the United States, pursuant to 1 U.S.C. 112b(a); to the 
     Committee on International Relations.
       1282. A letter from the Administrator, Agency for 
     International Development, transmitting the quarterly update 
     report on development assistant program allocations as of 
     March 31, 1995, pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 2413(a); to the 
     Committee on International Relations.
       1283. A letter from the Administrator, Federal Aviation 
     Administration, transmitting the administration's final 
     environmental impact statement [FEIS] on the effects of the 
     implementation of the expanded east coast plan over the State 
     of New Jersey, pursuant to Public Law 101-508, section 
     9119(c) (104 Stat. 1388-369); to the Committee on 
     Transportation and Infrastructure.
```
§ 594.8 Fee for importing a vehicle pursuant to a determination by the Administrator. ( a ) A fee as specified in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section shall be paid by each importer of a vehicle covered by a determination made under part 593 of this chapter to cover the direct and indirect costs incurred by NHTSA in making such determinations.
( b ) If a determination has been made pursuant to a petition, the fee for each vehicle is $138. The direct and indirect costs that determine the fee are those set forth in § 594.7(b), (c), and (d).
( c ) If a determination has been made on or after October 1, 2014, pursuant to the Administrator's initiative, the fee for each vehicle is $125. The direct and indirect costs that determine the fee are those set forth in §§ 594.7(b), (c), and (d), and references to “petition” shall be understood as relating to NHTSA's documents that serve as a basis for initiating determinations on its own initiative.
[55 FR 40667, Oct. 4, 1990, as amended at 58 FR 51023, Sept. 30, 1993; 61 FR 51045, Sept. 30, 1996; 63 FR 45186, Aug. 25, 1998; 65 FR 56500, Sept. 19, 2000; 67 FR 60599, Sept. 26, 2002; 69 FR 57874, Sept. 28, 2004; 71 FR 43990, Aug. 3, 2006; 73 FR 54986, Sept. 24, 2008; 75 FR 48613, Aug. 11, 2010; 77 FR 50642, Aug. 22, 2012; 79 FR 57007, Sept. 24, 2014]
#### Evan Jones, Appellant, v. Henry McCaddin, Jr , Respondent

—Judgment affirmed, with

costs. Opinion by

Pratt, J.
§ 604.14 Recipient's notification to registered charter providers. ( a ) Upon receiving a request for charter service, a recipient may: ( 1 ) Decline to provide the service, with or without referring the requestor to FTA's charter registration Web site (*http://www.fta.dot.gov/laws/leg_reg_179.html*);
( 2 ) Provide the service under an exception provided in subpart B of this part; or
( 3 ) Provide notice to registered charter providers as provided in this section and provide the service pursuant to § 604.9.
( b ) If a recipient is interested in providing charter service under the exception contained in § 604.9, then upon receipt of a request for charter service, the recipient shall provide e-mail notice to registered charter providers in the recipient's geographic service area in the following manner: ( 1 ) E-mail notice of the request shall be sent by the close of business on the day the recipient receives the request unless the recipient received the request after 2 p.m., in which case the recipient shall send the notice by the close of business the next business day;
( 2 ) E-mail notice sent to the list of registered charter providers shall include: ( i ) Customer name, address, phone number, and e-mail address (if available);
( ii ) Requested date of service;
( iii ) Approximate number of passengers;
( iv ) Whether the type of equipment requested is (are) bus(es) or van(s); and
( v ) Trip itinerary and approximate duration; and
( 3 ) If the recipient intends to provide service that meets the definition of charter service under § 604.3(c)(2), the e-mail notice must include the fare the recipient intends to charge for the service.
( c ) A recipient shall retain an electronic copy of the e-mail notice and the list of registered charter providers that were sent e-mail notice of the requested charter service for a period of at least three years from the date the e-mail notice was sent.
( d ) If a recipient receives an “undeliverable” notice in response to its e-mail notice, the recipient shall send the notice via facsimile. The recipient shall maintain the record of the undeliverable e-mail notice and the facsimile sent confirmation for a period of three years.
-----Original Message----- 

From: LACOTAANGENI@YAHOO.COM [mailto:LACOTAANGENI@YAHOO.COM] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 8:44 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 28, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone and 

Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (RIN 

1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from charging 

higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket expenses for mental 

health treatment than they would for other physical health care. Thank you 

for ensuring that mental health care and physical health care coverage are 

included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

bernice keiner 

82 south welles street 

wilkes barre, PA 18702
§ 452.7 Continuous examination program. ( a ) In lieu of a periodic examination under § 452.1, each owner of an approved container meeting § 450.5 may examine the container or have it examined using an approved continuous examination program. An owner must submit the continuous examination program for approval to the Commandant (CG-OES), Attn: Office of Operating and Environmental Standards, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509. When submitting a continuous examination program for approval the owner must show the continuous examination complies with § 452.9.
( b ) The owner must mark the container with the letters “ACEP/USA/(year continuous examination program is approved)” to indicate the container is being periodically examined under an approved continuous examination program. This marking must be as close as practicable to the safety approval plate. This marking must be on all containers covered by a continuous examination program by January 1, 1987.
( c ) The owner of containers subject to this section shall have those containers examined in accordance with the program prescribed in this section regardless of whether the examinations are performed within or outside the United States.
(The information collection requirements contained in paragraphs (a) and (b) have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under OMB control number 1625-0024) [49 FR 15562, Apr. 19, 1984, as amended at 69 FR 58353, Sept. 30, 2004; 74 FR 49241, Sept. 25, 2009; 74 FR 49241, Sept. 25, 2009; 77 FR 59790, Oct. 1, 2012; 78 FR 60166, Sept. 30, 2013]
§ 38.157 Lighting. ( a ) Any stepwell or doorway immediately adjacent to the driver shall have, when the door is open, at least 2 foot-candles of illumination measured on the step tread.
( b ) The vehicle doorway shall have outside light(s) which, when the door is open, provide at least 1 foot-candle of illumination on the pathway to the door for a distance of 3 feet (915 mm) to the bottom step tread or lift outer edge. Such light(s) shall be shielded to protect the eyes of entering and exiting passengers.
[56 FR 45756, Sept. 6, 1991, as amended at 63 FR 51698, 51702, Sept. 28, 1998]
Order entered April 2, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00458-CR

LONZELL HUNTER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1676537-P

ORDER

Pending is the State’s second motion for an extension of time to file its brief. The motion 

is GRANTED and the Clerk of the Court is hereby ordered to file the State’s brief tendered to the 

Court.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1424.html[7/23/2015 10:37:35 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvn-7mtg

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1424

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Sheila Keck

Address:

5030 Allisonville Road

Unit B

Indianapolis, IN, 46205

Email: safelady57@aol.com

General Comment

Dear Elected Officials

Please consider these facts. I have worked from age 18 and have contributed state and federal tax

 dollars not to mention property taxes to support my local school/education funding. 

I have a 401K that was cut in half due to Black Monday 20 some years ago and have never recovered the loss.

I intend to work until age 66-1/2 not age 65 based on the extra benefit currently predicted. I do not believe as not

 tax paying citizens employed by the federal government you have a good pulse on the outcome of extending the

 age required to work to obtain full social security benefits. 

We as a nation are supporting non working people who are scamming the system by collecting welfare and

 disability benefits. Many of this non working population are drug dealers making more money than the common

 working man. Other are on social security due to work related injuries and have been deemed unable to work in

 their primary occupation and have found drug addiction to pain meds is an easier route than working. 

It is unfair to single out the working class segment of our population who does their part to support the tax base

 of our nation. Meanwhile those who choose a scam the system lifestyle prevail. 

Quit allocating money we don't have to programs that feed the scammers. There is not solid auditing or

 enforcement of funding. We can't as a nation continue to spend money we simply don't have.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1424.html[7/23/2015 10:37:35 AM]
From: Yanca, Catherine

To: Yanca, Catherine

Subject: Part 2 of Follow-up to 3/12 Tier 3 call

Date: Monday, April 15, 2013 2:19:24 PM

Attachments: Follow up to 3_12 Tier 3 call.docx

Follow up to 3_12 Tier 3 call part 2.docx

From: Sargeant, Kathryn 

Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 2:45 PM

To: Amanda_I._Lee@omb.eop.gov; Whiteman, Chad

Cc: Charmley, William; Stewart, Lori; Ghanta, Venu; Nickerson, William; Jutras, Nathaniel; Nagelhout,

Peter; Brunner, Christine

Subject: Part 2 of Follow-up to 3/12 Tier 3 call

I’m attaching the rest of EPA’s edits in response to our phone call of 3/12.  These address the

criteria pollutant impacts of the LD GHG rule and the fuel economy impacts of the Tier 3 vehicle

standards.

Please let me know if you have any additional questions.

From: Sargeant, Kathryn 

Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 4:34 PM

To: Whiteman, Chad; Amanda_I._Lee@omb.eop.gov

Cc: Charmley, William; Stewart, Lori; Ghanta, Venu; Nickerson, William; Jutras, Nathaniel; Nagelhout,

Peter; Brunner, Christine

Subject: Follow-up to 3/12 Tier 3 call

At our phone call on 3/12 we agreed to make a few changes to the preamble.

I’m attaching some preamble excerpts that show you our suggested changes.  These address the

issues of rate of return on investment for refinery investments, and some further explanation of

our refinery CO2 analysis.

Please let me know if you have any questions.
Exhibit 99.3

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Texas-New Mexico Power Company (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jack V. Chambers, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company 

 

/s/ Jack V. Chambers 

 

Jack V. Chambers 

Chief Executive Officer 

March 28, 2003
EXHIBIT 32





FACT CORPORATION





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of FACT Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jacqueline Danforth, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  May 23, 2011
By:
/s/ Jacqueline DanforthName:
Jacqueline DanforthTitle:
Principal Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000707604
<NAME> BRITTON & KOONTZ FIRST NATIONAL BANK
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         6416124
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       123857811
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               1125000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   11023863
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        32867196
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          33680262
<LOANS>                                      115949780
<ALLOWANCE>                                     784783
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               175346587
<DEPOSITS>                                   145653152
<SHORT-TERM>                                   6830660
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            3631308
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       4417660
<OTHER-SE>                                    14813807
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               175346587
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                7396090
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              2353950
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               9750040
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             4254063
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4373458
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          5376583
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   120000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                3734816
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2625780
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1738125
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1738125
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .98
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.99
<LOANS-NON>                                      80000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    803000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                676745
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    31867
<RECOVERIES>                                     19904
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               784783
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>