54014 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 183 / Friday, September 21, 2007 / Notices 

Systems Agency (DISA), the DoD Media 

Activities (DMA), and the Adjudication 

and Office of Hearing and Appeals 

Offices, which are currently located in 

a mix of leased facilities and at 

government installations. 

Additionally, Fort Meade plans to 

issue a real estate lease that allows the 

development of certain parcels through 

the Army’s EUL program to help 

support mission-oriented uses on post, 

to derive value from underutilized 

property, to build future land value, and 

to enhance the installation’s ability to 

implement its comprehensive master 

plan. Fort Meade proposes to lease to a 

private developer about 173 acres in two 

parcels for a term of 50 years and 

receive in-kind development of a 367- 

acre parcel. Because the development of 

these three parcels would have potential 

impacts in the same region as the BRAC 

realignment actions, it is considered in 

this FEIS. The two parcels that will be 

leased are located on installation 

property outside the fence line. The 

third parcel proposed for in-kind 

development is located within the fence 

line along the perimeter of the 

installation. 

The FEIS addresses alternatives that 

include: (1) a No Action Alternative, (2) 

BRAC-Directed Realignment and EUL 

Actions, and (3) BRAC-Directed 

Actions. The Preferred Alternative is 

Alternative 2 which includes 

construction and operation of proposed 

facilities to accommodate incoming 

military missions at Fort Meade as 

mandated by the 2005 BRAC 

Commission recommendations and 

Army’s EUL actions. Alternative sites on 

Fort Meade for placement of proposed 

BRAC facilities have also been 

evaluated. Alternative siting variations 

would provide similar impacts and 

benefits as compared to the Preferred 

Alternative. The No Action Alternative 

provides the baseline conditions for 

comparison to the Preferred Alternative. 

As stated in the FEIS, implementation 

of the BRAC-Directed Realignment and 

EUL Actions, which is the Preferred 

Alternative, will result in long-term 

environmental impacts on 

transportation, land uses, 

socioeconomics areas (demographics, 

schools, and law enforcement), visual 

and aesthetic resources, biological 

(vegetation and wildlife), and utilities 

(wastewater and storm water drainage). 

Implementation of the Preferred 

Alternative would have short-term 

environmental impacts to visual and 

aesthetic resources, noise, energy 

sources, and solid waste disposal; and 

potential short-term indirect effects to 

surface water during construction 

activities. Implementation of the 

Preferred Alternative would have no 

significant impacts to air quality, 

geology and soils; water resources 

(groundwater, floodplains, and coastal 

zones); biological (rare, threatened, and 

endangered species and aquatic 

species); socioeconomics areas 

(economic development and housing); 

utilities (potable water, energy sources 

operations, solid waste operations); and 

hazardous and toxic substances. There 

would be no adverse impacts to 

surrounding land uses, cultural 

resources, socioeconomics areas 

(environmental justice, recreation, or 

protection of children), utilities 

(communications), and hazardous waste 

disposal from implementation of the 

BRAC and EUL Actions Alternative. 

An electronic version of the FEIS can 

be viewed or downloaded from the 

following URL: http:// 

www.hqda.army.mil/acsim/brac/ 

nepa_eis_docs.htm. 

Dated: September 11, 2007. 

Addison D. Davis, IV, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army, 

(Environment, Safety and Occupational 

Health). 

[FR Doc. 07–4665 Filed 9–20–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3710–08–M 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Army 

Department of Defense Historical 

Advisory Committee; Meeting 

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD. 

ACTION: Notice of open meeting. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 

10(a) (2) of the Federal Advisory 

Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463), 

announcement is made of the following 

committee meeting. 

Name of Committee: Department of 

the Army Historical Advisory 

Committee. 

Date: October 25, 2007. 

Time: 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. 

Place: U.S. Army Center of Militry 

History Collins Hall, Building 35, 103 

Third Avenue, Fort McNair, 

Washington, DC 20319–5058. 

Proposed Agenda: Review and 

discussion of the status of historical 

activities in the United States Army. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. 

Richard Stewart, U.S. Army Center of 

Military History, ATTN: DAMH–ZC, 

103 Third Avenue, Fort McNair, 

Washington, DC 20319–5058; telephone 

number (202) 685–2709. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

committee will review the Army’s 

historical activities for FY 1007 and 

those projected for FY 2008 based upon 

reports and manuscript received 

throughout the period. And the 

committee will formulate 

recommendations through the Chief of 

Military History to the Chief of Staff, 

Army and the Secretary of the Army for 

advancing the use of history in the U.S. 

Army. 

The meeting of the Advisory 

Committee is open to the public. 

Because of the restricted meeting space, 

however, attendance may be limited to 

those persons who have notified the 

Advisory Committee Management 

Office in writing at least five days prior 

to the meeting of their intention to 

attend the October 25, 2007 meeting. 

Notifications should be addressed to the 

Executive Secretary of the committee, 

Dr. William Stivers, at the U.S. Army 

Center of Military History, 103 Third 

Avenue, Fort Lesley J. McNair, 

Washington, DC 20-319–5058. 

Any member of the public may file a 

written statement with the committee 

before, during, or after the meting. Such 

statements may be sent to the Executive 

Secretary of the Committee at the 

Address shown in the paragraph above. 

To the extent that time permits, the 

committee chairman may allow public 

presentations or oral statements at the 

meeting. 

Dated: September 5, 2007. 

Richard W. Stewart, 

Chief Historian, Center of Military History. 

[FR Doc. 07–4694 Filed 9–20–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3710–08–M 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Army 

Intent To Grant a Partially Exclusive 

License for a U.S. Army Owned 

Invention to Savit Corporation 

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of the Army 

announces that, unless there is an 

objection, after 15 days it intends to 

grant a partially exclusive license to 

Savit Corporation, a corporation having 

a place of business in Parsippany, New 

Jersey, on ‘‘Combat Ammunition Pack’’, 

U.S. patent number 6,675,693. Any 

license granted shall comply with 35 

U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR part 404. 

DATES: File written objections by 

October 9, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Timothy S. Ryan, Technology Transfer 

Program Manager, AMSRD–AAR–EMB, 

U.S. Army ARDEC, Picatinny Arsenal, 

NY 07806–5000, e-mail 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 183 / Friday, September 21, 2007 / Notices 54015 

timothy.s.ryan@us.army.mil, (973) 724–

7953. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written 

objections must be filed within 15 days 

from publication date of this notice in 

the Federal Register. Any license 

granted shall comply with 35 U.S.C. 209 

and 37 CFR part 404. 

Brenda S. Bowen, 

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 07–4693 Filed 9–20–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3710–08–M 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Army 

Intent To Grant a Partially Exclusive 

License for a U.S. Army Owned 

Invention to Machining Technologies, 

Inc. 

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of the Army 

announces that, unless there is an 

objection, after 15 days it intends to 

grant a partially exclusive license to 

Machining Technologies, Inc., a 

corporation having a place of business 

in Hebron, Maryland, on ‘‘Semi 

Permanent backup Iron Sight’’, U.S. 

patent number 6,779,290. Any license 

granted shall comply with 35 U.S.C. 209 

and 37 CFR part 404. 

DATES: File written objections by 

October 9, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Timothy S. Ryan, Technology Transfer 

Program Manager, AMSRD–AAR–EMB, 

U.S. Army ARDEC, Picatinny Arsenal, 

NJ 07806–5000, e-mail: 

timothy.s.ryan@us.army.mil, (973) 724–

7953. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written 

objections must be filed within 15 days 

from publication date of this notice in 

the Federal Register. Any license 

granted shall comply with 35 U.S.C. 209 

and 37 CFR part 404. 

Brenda S. Bowen, 

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 07–4695 Filed 9–20–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3710–08–M 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Navy 

Revised Notice of Intent To Prepare an 

Environmental Impact Statement/ 

Overseas Environmental Impact 

Statement for the Undersea Warfare 

Training Range and Notice of Request 

for Public Scoping Comments 

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD. 

ACTION: Revised Notice of Intent. 

SUMMARY: This notice is issued to advise 

the public that the Draft Environmental 

Impact Statement/Overseas 

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/ 

OEIS) for the Undersea Warfare Training 

Range (USWTR) will be revised, and to 

invite the public to provide comments 

for consideration during preparation of 

the revised EIS/OEIS. 

In compliance with Section (102)(2)(c) 

of the National Environmental Policy 

Act (NEPA) of 1969, as implemented by 

the Council on Environmental Quality 

Regulations (40 CFR Parts 1500–1508), 

and Executive Order 12114, the 

Department of Navy (Navy) announced 

the preparation of an EIS for the then 

‘‘East Coast Shallow Water Training 

Range EIS/OEIS’’ on May 13, 1996 (FR 

22028) and invited the public to 

comment on the scope of the EIS/OEIS. 

Subsequently, a Draft EIS/OEIS was 

released on October 28, 2005 (FR 62107) 

to evaluate the potential environmental 

consequences associated with 

constructing and operating an Undersea 

Warfare Training Range (USWTR). In 

response to comments received from 

federal agencies, state agencies, and 

members of the public, Navy 

determined that the DEIS should be 

revised and a new DEIS issued, 

incorporating suggestions received 

during the public review and comment 

period. The changes contemplated 

involve the addition of an alternative 

and a modification of the methodology 

used to analyze impacts on marine 

mammals. Given the nature of these 

changes, the Navy has decided to 

reopen the scoping process and invites 

the public to submit any comments 

relevant to the scope of issues to be 

addressed in the revised EIS/OEIS. 

Scoping comments previously 

submitted following publication of the 

1996 NOI are still valid and will be 

considered. 

All comments received during the Oct 

2005 DEIS public review and comment 

period will be considered during the 

course of this scoping process and need 

not be resubmitted. 

The proposed action is to instrument 

an approximate 500-square-nauticalmile area of the ocean with undersea 

cables and sensor nodes, creating a 

USWTR, and to use the USWTR for antisubmarine warfare (ASW) training. The 

purpose of the proposed action is to 

enable the Navy to train effectively in an 

ocean environment encompassing 

required water depths (e.g., 120 to 900 

feet depth) at a suitable location for 

Navy Atlantic Fleet units. Training 

typically would involve an individual 

unit or up to three vessels and two 

aircraft using the range at any one time. 

The Navy anticipates analyzing four 

alternative sites. The candidate sites are 

located in the Atlantic Ocean 

approximately 30 to 50 nautical miles 

offshore, within existing Navy 

Operating Areas (OPAREAs). The three 

candidate sites previously identified as 

alternatives would continue to be 

considered: Offshore of northeastern 

Virginia, offshore of southeastern North 

Carolina, and offshore of northeastern 

Florida. A site offshore of central South 

Carolina will be added as a fourth 

alternative. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

USWTR EIS/OEIS Project Manager, 

Facilities Engineering Command 

Atlantic, 6506 Hampton Boulevard, 

Norfolk, Virginia 23508–1278; 

telephone: 757–322–4398; facsimile: 

757–322–4894. Additional background 

information on the USWTR, including 

the prior DEIS and the public comments 

received, will remain available during 

this re-opened scoping process via the 

Web site http://projects.earthtech.com/ 

USWTR/. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Navy 

requires an undersea warfare training 

range off the east coast of the U.S. to 

support training in safe and controlled 

locations while providing an ocean 

environment that is consistent with realworld threat conditions. Range 

instrumentation is required to provide 

real-time feedback to Navy participants. 

The offshore instrumented area would 

be connected to shore via a trunk cable, 

which allows data gathered during 

exercises to be transferred for 

participant feedback. 

The Navy’s mission is to maintain, 

train, and equip combat-ready naval 

forces capable of winning wars, 

deterring aggression and maintaining 

freedom of the seas. For that reason, 10 

U.S.C. 5062 directs the Chief of Naval 

Operations to train all naval forces for 

combat. Therefore, naval forces must 

have access to training areas where they 

can develop and maintain skills for 

wartime missions. ASW is a Navy core 

capability and is critical to the Navy’s 

mission. The Navy must be trained and 

capable with active sonars in littoral 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES