alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Crim. No. 3491.

Second Dist., Div. Two.

Sept. 24, 1941.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. FRED EAVES, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellant.

Earl Warren, Attorney General, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

July 31, 1941, the transcripts on appeal were filed in this court. Thereafter, the time for filing briefs having elapsed, an order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed was issued, returnable September 24, 1941. On the latter date there was no appearance on behalf of appellant, either by brief or otherwise.

Therefore, pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code, the judgment of the trial court hereby is affirmed.
# Iraq progresses in taking back Ramadi, CENTCOM spokesman says

/ Published July 27, 2015

**WASHINGTON, July 27, 2015 -** Iraqi security forces are making progress on multiple axes in their battle to retake the city of Ramadi from Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant control, a U.S. Central Command spokesman said Friday.

Speaking to Pentagon reporters via teleconference, Air Force Col. Patrick Ryder provided an overall update in operations against ISIL in the combatant command's area of responsibility.

"[Iraqi forces are] in the process of isolating Ramadi to conduct a deliberate clearing operation to retake the provincial capital city," he said.

Since the July 12 start of the Ramadi counterattack, coalition forces have conducted 76 airstrikes, targeting enemy positions, fighters, equipment, command and control modes, vehicle borne improvised explosive device and weapons caches, he said.

ISIL is trying to hold onto Ramadi by using vehicle bombs, suicide bombers and other tactics designed to slow Iraqi forces' movement, Ryder said. "They're continuing to rely on propaganda to mitigate their losses and overstate operational performance," he added.

While it's still early in what's expected to be a long fight against ISIL extremists, the colonel said, CENTCOM officials are encouraged by the well-developed and comprehensive plan the Iraqis have put together and executed.

"They continue to liberate their territory, and coalition forces will continue its support to degrade and ultimately defeat ISIL," Ryder said.

Iraq's recent purchase of U.S. F-16 fighters has assisted in the fight against ISIL, said the CENTCOM spokesman. Sharing a platform that many NATO allies also have enhances interoperability gives Iraqi forces the ability to conduct operations with coalition forces, he added.

CENTCOM has assessed that the majority of the town of Beiji is under Iraqi control, although its oil refinery remains contested, the colonel said. Further north, he told reporters, there has been little change as Iraq's Kurdish forces hold their defensive lines from Sinjar to the north side of Mosul and down to the north of Kirkuk against ISIL's "harassing attacks," most of which have been between Sinjar and Mosul.

Coalition aircraft have conducted 16 "dynamic airstrikes" since July 12 in the area around Mosul, targeting enemy personnel, weapons and equipment, he added.

Across Iraq and Syria in the fight against ISIL, coalition forces have continued to degrade the extremist organization's capabilities, Ryder said.

"We've removed hundreds more fighters from the battlefield, including numerous ISIL leaders and facilitators," Ryder said. "This inevitably reduces the organization's effectiveness and forces them to make tough choices to how and where to apply resources."
From: Thomas Eisenzimmer [mailto:thomas@eisenzimmerfinancial.com] 

Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2015 8:56 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Potential DOL changes

I am a registered rep with ProEquities, holding a series 7 and 24 for over 30 years. During that time I 

have assisted many families. My primary focus is primary school educators and associated support staff.

My question for you. IF I am to be held to higher standard, how am I to bill the customer this week who 

was referred to me to learn about investments and wants to invest $ 1,000 and perhaps $ 50/month or 

the small business owner who is just starting a Simple IRA where participants will deposit modest sums 

each month.

While I am an IAR with my firm I think you are missing the boat in basically pushing my service out of the 

realm of the small investors who have been a prime client of mine over many years. Interesting, that 

these small clients over time have blossomed and become at least for me not only part of our family but 

their asset base has grown given time.

Am I missing something here?

Thomas Eisenzimmer

513 984 9111
§ 556.4 Petition for exemption. ( a ) A manufacturer who has determined the existence, in a motor vehicle or item of replacement equipment that he produces, of a defect related to motor vehicle safety or a noncompliance with an applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standard, or who has received notice of an initial determination by the NHTSA of the existence of a defect related to motor vehicle safety or a noncompliance, may petition for exemption from the Act's notification and remedy requirements on the grounds that the defect or noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
( b ) Each petition submitted under this part shall— ( 1 ) Be written in the English language;
( 2 ) Be submitted in three copies to: Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC 20590;
( 3 ) State the full name and address of the applicant, the nature of its organization (e.g., individual, partnership, or corporation) and the name of the State or country under the laws of which it is organized.
( 4 ) Describe the motor vehicle or item of replacement equipment, including the number involved and the period of production, and the defect or noncompliance concerning which an exemption is sought; and
( 5 ) Set forth all data, views, and arguments of the petitioner supporting his petition.
( 6 ) Be accompanied by three copies of the report the manufacturer has submitted, or is submitting, to NHTSA in accordance with part 573 of this chapter, relating to its determination of the existence of safety related defect or noncompliance with an applicable safety standard that is the subject of the petition.
( c ) In the case of defects related to motor vehicle safety or noncompliances determined to exist by a manufacturer, petitions under this part must be submitted not later than 30 days after such determination. In the case of defects related to motor vehicle safety or noncompliances initially determined to exist by the NHTSA, petitions must be submitted not later than 30 days after notification of the determination has been received by the manufacturer. Such a petition will not constitute a concession by the manufacturer of, nor will it be considered relevant to, the existence of a defect related to motor vehicle safety or a nonconformity.
[42 FR 7145, Feb. 7, 1977, as amended at 56 FR 66376, Dec. 23, 1991]
H. Res. 34

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 13, 2001.

Whereas the Governments of the United States and Israel are

close allies and share a deep and abiding friendship based

on a shared commitment to democratic values;

Whereas since its establishment in 1948, Israel has fulfilled

the dreams of its founders, who envisioned a vigorous,

open, and stable democracy;

Whereas the centerpiece of Israeli democracy is its system of

competitive, free, and open elections;

Whereas on February 6, 2001, the people of Israel elected

Ariel Sharon as Prime Minister of Israel; and

Whereas the election on February 6, 2001, is the most recent

example of the commitment of Israel to the democratic

ideals of freedom and pluralism, ideals that Israel shares

with the United States: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) congratulates Ariel Sharon on his election as

Prime Minister, and extends to him the best wishes of

the people of the United States;
2

•HRES 34 EH

(2) commends the people of Israel for reaffirming,

through their participation in the election on February

6, 2001, their dedication to democratic ideals;

(3) urges Palestine Liberation Organization Chairman Yasser Arafat to use his influence and resources to

see that violence in the Middle East is brought to an

end;

(4) calls upon the countries that neighbor Israel

and upon the international community to respect the

freely expressed will of the people of Israel and to be

prepared to engage in constructive relations with the

new Government of Israel;

(5) reaffirms the close bonds of friendship that have

bound the people of the United States and the people of

Israel together through turbulent times for more than

half a century; and

(6) restates the commitment of the United States to

a secure peace for Israel.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 24-8



POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, Edgar D. Jannotta do hereby appoint John W. Rowe and Randall E. Mehrberg, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange
Commission report on Form 10-K for 2004 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully
and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.



/s/    EDGAR D.
JANNOTTAEdgar D. Jannotta




DATE:
February 23, 2005
§ 520.4 Applicability. ( a ) *Scope.* This part applies to all elements of NHTSA, including the Regional Offices.
( b ) *Actions covered.* Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, this part applies to the following agency actions and such actions and proposals as may be sponsored jointly with another agency: ( 1 ) New and continuing programs and projects; budget proposals; legislative proposals by the agency; requests for appropriations; reports on legislation initiated elsewhere where the agency has primary responsibility for the subject matter involved; and any renewals or reapprovals of the foregoing;
( 2 ) Research, development, and demonstration projects; formal approvals of work plans; and associated contracts;
( 3 ) Rulemaking and regulatory actions, including Notices of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM); requests for procurement (RFP); requests for grants (Annual Work Programs); and contracts;
( 4 ) All grants, loans or other financial assistance for use in State and Community projects;
( 5 ) Annual State Highway Safety Work Programs;
( 6 ) Construction; leases; purchases; operation of Federal facilities; and
( 7 ) Any other activity, project, or action likely to have a significant effect on the environment.
( c ) *Continuing actions.* This part applies to any action enumerated in paragraph (b) of this section, even though such actions arise from a project or program initiated prior to enactment of the National Environmental Policy Act on January 1, 1970.
( d ) *Environmental assessments.* Within the scope of activities listed in § 520.4(b), any person outside the agency submitting a program or project proposal may be requested to prepare an environmental assessment of such proposed action to be included in his submission to the agency.
( e ) *Exceptions.* ( 1 ) Assistance in the form of general revenue sharing funds, distributed under the State and Local Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972, 31 U.S.C. 1221, with no control by the NHTSA over the subsequent use of such funds;
( 2 ) Personnel actions;
( 3 ) Administrative procurements (e.g., general supplies) and contracts for personal services;
( 4 ) Legislative proposals originating in another agency and relating to matters not within NHTSA's primary areas of responsibility;
( 5 ) Project amendments (e.g., increases in costs) which have no environmental significance; and
( 6 ) Minor agency actions that are determined by the official responsible for the actions to be of such limited scope that they clearly will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment.
( f ) *Consolidation of statements.* Proposed actions (and alternatives thereto) having substantially similar environmental impacts may be covered by a single environmental review and environmental impact statement or negative declaration.
#### § 579.2 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to enhance motor vehicle safety by specifying information and documents that manufacturers of motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment must provide to NHTSA with respect to possible safety-related defects and noncompliances in their products, including the reporting of safety recalls and other safety campaigns that the manufacturer conducts outside the United States.

[67 FR 63310, Oct. 11, 2002]
5 August 2013 

lAW OFFICE OF 

MARTIN A. BLUMENTHAL 

ONE NORTHFIELD PLAZA, SUITE 300 

NORTHFIELD, ILLINOIS 60093 

(847) 441-2687 

FAX (8471 831-1406 

E-MAIL: marty@blumenthallaw.com 

ADMITIED IN ILLINOIS AND WISCONSIN 

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT 

Attention Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 

Hearing Docket 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave, S_W_ 

Washington, DC 20591 

re: National Power Corporation 

AGL-7B 

2010-GL-70-0212 

Via Regular and Certified Mail 7010 0290 0001 7916 5590 

Dear Sir/Madam: 

Pursuant to 14 CFR 13 .16 (g) (2) (ii) National Power Corporation hereby requests a formal 

hearing in this matter. 

Sincerely, 

cc: Jeffrey A_ Klang 

· Kate Barber 

Ira A! port RECEIVED 

AUG t 3 2013 

. HEARING DOCKET
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Fisher Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q/A), I David D. Hillard, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (3) |  | The Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (4) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: September 12, 2003



/s/ David D. HillardDavid D. HillardSenior Vice PresidentChief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*The Second Avenue Railroad in the City of New York *v.*The Board of Commissioners of the Department of Public Parks of the City of New York, *Respondents.*—

Motion to quash the writ of *certiorari*denied, without costs. Proceedings and order of the Board of Commissioners of Public Parks affirmed, with costs.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128737 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

J. W. McCULLOUGH, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 128737 

 COA: 259238 

WCAC: 03-000156 

ROUGE STEEL COMPANY, Self-Insured,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 11, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t1121 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2005 

Clerk
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Home
  ABOUT US
  LEADERSHIP
  Bio Article View
 Biography Download
 Chief of Staff, Major General Brandon R. Tegtmeier
 
 Chief of Staff, Major General Brandon R. Tegtmeier is from Naperville, IL and commissioned into the Infantry from the United States Military Academy, West Point in 1996 with a degree in Mechanical Engineering.  He also holds a Master of Science in Strategic Studies from the United States Army War College. MG Tegtmeier served in Ranger, Airborne, and Stryker units throughout his career to include serving as Commander of the 75th Ranger Regiment.  During this time, he spent over four years leading forces in the U.S. Central Command Area of Responsibility. He most recently served as the Executive Assistant to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff as well as Deputy Commanding General (Operations) and Deputy Commanding General (Support) of the 82nd Airborne Division.
 SHARE
 PRINT
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
§ 269.5 Definitions. As used in this part— *Act* means the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (Pub. L. 114-94 (Dec. 4, 2015)).
*Administrator* means the Federal Railroad Administrator, or the Federal Railroad Administrator's delegate.
*Amtrak* means the National Railroad Passenger Corporation.
*Eligible petitioner* means one of the following entities, other than Amtrak, that has submitted a petition to FRA under § 269.7: ( 1 ) A rail carrier or rail carriers that own the infrastructure over which Amtrak operates a long-distance route, or another rail carrier that has a written agreement with a rail carrier or rail carriers that own such infrastructure;
( 2 ) A State, group of States, or State-supported joint powers authority or other sub-State governance entity responsible for providing intercity rail passenger transportation with a written agreement with the rail carrier or rail carriers that own the infrastructure over which Amtrak operates a long-distance route and that host or would host the intercity rail passenger transportation; or
( 3 ) A State, group of States, or State-supported joint powers authority or other sub-State governance entity responsible for providing intercity rail passenger transportation and a rail carrier with a written agreement with another rail carrier or rail carriers that own the infrastructure over which Amtrak operates a long-distance route and that host or would host the intercity rail passenger transportation.
*File* and *filed* mean submission of a document under this part to FRA at *PassengerRail.Liaison@dot.gov* on the date the document was emailed to FRA.
*Financial plan* means a plan that contains, for each Federal fiscal year fully or partially covered by the bid: ( 1 ) An annual projection of the revenues, expenses, capital expenditure requirements, and cash flows (from operating activities, investing activities, and financing activities, showing sources and uses of funds, including the operating subsidy amount) attributable to the route; and
( 2 ) A statement of the assumptions underlying the financial plan's contents.
*FRA* means the Federal Railroad Administration.
*Operating plan* means a plan that contains, for each Federal fiscal year fully or partially covered by the bid: ( 1 ) A complete description of the service planned to be offered, including the train schedules, frequencies, equipment consists, fare structures, and such amenities as sleeping cars and food service provisions; station locations; hours of operation; provisions for accommodating the traveling public, including proposed arrangements for stations shared with other routes; expected ridership; passenger-miles; revenues by class of service between each city-pair proposed to be served; connectivity with other intercity transportation services; and compliance with applicable Service Outcome Agreements; and
( 2 ) A statement of the assumptions underlying the operating plan's contents.
*Long-distance route* means those routes described in 49 U.S.C. 24102(5) and operated by Amtrak on the date of enactment of the Act.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 2-93777, 33-21252, 33-39684, 33-73674, 33-80038, 33-21213 and
33-43429) pertaining to the 1984 Incentive Stock Option Plan, 1985 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan, 1990 Directors' Stock Option Plan and 1994 Stock Option
Plan of Collagen Aesthetics, Inc. (formerly Collagen Corporation) of our report
dated July 31, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Collagen Aesthetics, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended June 30, 1998.
 
                                                         /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Palo Alto, California
September 25, 1998
----

**EXHIBIT      32.5**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: April                18, 2006 | By:    | /s/                W. Douglas Hobbs    |
|------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                                     |   | W.                Douglas Hobbs        |
|                                     |   | President                and           |
|                                     |   | Chief                Executive Officer |