alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Richard Hoffman [mailto:richhoffman@comcast.net] 

Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 8:13 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Proposed Fiduciary Ruling. 

For over 50 years I have been working with ordinary citizens who want to save for their later years or for 

life's emergencies. They do not know the first thing about investing and want someone to help then 

and to be there when they call. When the markets have a drop as several days ago, they do ask should 

we sell or hang in there for the longer haul if they have the time horizon to do so. If our services must 

go away many may not save at all or put their savings , IRA's ,401-K's etc into very low yielding places 

where real inflation crushes them over time. Is this what is wanted, am ever eroding financial situation 

such as the Federal Government's insane debt. With Social Security under funded, thanks to the Federal 

Govt., and Medicare trillians under funded long term this will add to the already mounting dilema, is 

this is the desired results being sought? Seems like it is. With ever mounting government intervention I 

have been told from several reliable sources that younger persons in the financial planning industry are 

fewer and fewer. Again is the desired results?? I do feel very sorry for our grandchildren and their 

offsprings. Hope some common sense can be applied, but feel that is no longer allowed. What made 

this country what it WAS? Strong families, going or gone!! Strong work ethic with most working. Going 

or Gone!! Abiding by the Laws of the Land, Constituiton, Going or gone. Our dictator goes past the both 

houses and what are they doing about it, nothing but suck their thumbs!!! In Egypt a similar problem 

existed and it was corrected and went back to the law of the land. This new ruling will be one more (of 

many) spikes in the coffin of what was the USA. What a shame.

Richard H. Hoffman
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY

, Appellant,

v.

PEMBROKE PINES PHYSICIANS ASSOCIATES, INC., a/a/o TONY CURRIE

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 0047

[ July 1, 2021 ]

Appeal from the C ounty Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; John D. Fry , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 062013SC012082AXXXCE and 062018AP018165AXCCE

.

Sarah Lahlou

- Amine, DeeAnn J. McLemore, and Char l es W. Hall of Banker Lopez Gassler P.A., Tampa, Nancy W. Gr egoire of Birnbaum, Lippman & Gregoire, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, and Kathryn M. Winkler of Kirwan Spellacy Danner Watkins & Brownstein, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Mac S. Phil l ips of Phillips|Tadros, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIA M

.

Affirmed.

K LINGENSMITH

, K UNTZ and A RTAU , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1210-AB32-2-1497.html[7/26/2015 6:09:01 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwj-h11y

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1993

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Donna Shook

Organization: Regulations.gov

General Comment

Please do not put regulations and restrictions on people's retirement money. That decision should only be made

 by each individual and their own money.
-----Original Message-----

From: Durham Ellis [mailto:durhamellis@charter.net] 

Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 10:57 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

What makes you think you have the authority to pass such an invasive regulation? Did our Constitution 

say that you have been chosen to be “more equal than others”? You are our employees, not our 

masters.

I say to your proposal, HELL NO!

Durham Ellis

205-914-6600

www.poorgrandchildren.com
Editorial Note on Part 572
Editorial Notes: 1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 572.4 Terminology. ( a ) The term *dummy,* when used in this subpart A, refers to any test device described by this part. The term *dummy,* when used in any other subpart of this part, refers to the particular dummy described in that part.
( b ) Terms describing parts of the dummy, such as *head,* are the same as names for corresponding parts of the human body.
( c ) The term *unimodal,* when used in subparts C and I, refers to an acceleration-time curve which has only one prominent peak.
[38 FR 20451, Aug. 1, 1973, as amended at 42 FR 7152, Feb. 7, 1977; 44 FR 76530, Dec. 27, 1979; 56 FR 57836, Nov. 14, 1991]
202 225 5712 Line 1 11:12:56 04 10 2011 218
OU 0

Congress of the United States
Washington, DC 20515

April 20, 2011

The Honorable Hilda L. Solis J
U.S. Department of Labor 3 <
Frances Perkins Building a
Third Street and Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20210

Dear Secretary Solis:

We are writing with respect to the Department of Labor’s proposed regulation defining
the term “fiduciary”. We share the Department's perspective that it is critical to protect
individuals from misleading investment advice.

It is precisely the importance of this regulatory project that is causing us to write. We
believe that it is vital that this project be completed in a thorough manner that fully considers all
perspectives. In the absence of a complete review of all relevant factors, we fear that the
regulation could result in investors, especially middle-income investors, receiving far less
investment information or experiencing a very significant increase in the cost of such
information.

We applaud the Department for extending the comment period and holding a hearing on
this matter. However, the Department’s own uncertainty regarding the effects of the proposed
tule gives us tremendous cause for concern. The implications for small service providers,
potential increases in liability exposure and costs for service providers, and cost-benefit
information should all be closely studied, considered and then explained before any further
action is taken. P

In light of the uncertainty expressed by the Department and the significant amount of
concern expressed in the comments and at the hearing, we urge you to take the time necessary to
do a thorough review of the proposed regulation and the issues and concerns raised about the
proposal, including cost and market effects related to the proposed regulation. Additionally, we
encourage an analysis of the cost of the proposed regulation with respect to TRAS.

It may be appropriate for the Department to consider re-proposing the regulation. A re-
proposal would ensure that interested parties can review and comment on the numerous changes
expected in the proposed regulation. Re-proposing the regulation would also allow the
Department of Labor to work in a more harmonized manner with the SEC, the CFTC and the
Treasury Department, all of which have responsibilities related to your Department’s proposed
regulation.

PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER


202 225 5712 Line 1 11:13:12 04 19 2011 313

Some contend that the effect of this regulation would, (1) restrict access by middle-
income individuals to investment information with respect to plans and IRAs, and (2) eliminate
pension plans’ ability to use swaps to manage enormous risks that can affect the plan sponsor’s
financial health. ‘his level of concern warrants a careful and deliberate process.

Your consideration of our concerns would be deeply appreciated.

Sincerely,

Member of Congréss
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Monty Morgan Brittain, Appellant

No. 06

- 14

- 00004

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 402nd Judicial District Court of Wood County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 21,725

- 2012 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Carter, Chief Justice

Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of thi s date, we find that the motion of the appellant to

dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Monty Morgan Brittain, has adequately indicated his inability

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED FEBRUARY 20, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTIC E

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
CENTCOM public affairs complete latest communication integration seminar
 By ,
  MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. — Col. Abdulatif Ali Abdalla Mohammed, a member of the Department of Moral Guidance, Republic of Yemen’s Ministry of Defense, takes a question from Jason Medina, a member of the U.S. Central Command Communication Integration Directorate, during a communication integration seminar March 11-15.  On-camera interviews simulated real-life situations that would require the seminar participants to act as spokesmen for their departments.  (U.S. Central Command photo by Sgt. Fredrick J. Coleman)
 MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. (March 15, 2013) — Effective communication is a key component to a successful relationship between any military and the public. To share communication techniques and ideas, U.S. Central Command recently hosted public affairs representatives from the Yemen Ministry of Defense March 11-15 for a communication integration seminar. The intent of the seminar, the third in a series, was to establish a relationship and share the best communication practices with public affairs representatives from partner nations, according to Air Force Maj. Mae-Li Allison, the seminar coordinator.  Prior seminars were conducted with public affairs representatives from Jordan and Lebanon During the seminar, members of the Communication Integration Directorate gave briefs on a variety of public affairs and media-related topics to include media operations, communication planning, message development and internet-based media capabilities. Other briefs included the importance of engaging key leaders and a practical application of on-camera interviews to help the participants develop their interviewing skills as they will occasionally serve as spokespersons for their respective units. “Having the opportunity to learn from other military members who come from a background similar to mine was a great experience because of their knowledge in journalism and operations,” said Brig. Gen. Ali Ghaleb Ali Al-Harazi, who serves as the deputy director of Moral Guidance for the Republic of Yemen’s Ministry of Defense. “I now have more information and knowledge to take back to my shop and share with my workers.” The participants were selected by the U.S. Embassies in their host countries in conjunction with their respective defense departments, based on their experience and expertise within their armed forces. They came from backgrounds including logistics, administration, infantry, and journalism. Prior participants left the seminar more informed about public affairs practices and how to convey command information. “The seminar was very well organized and also very informative,” said Maj. Simon Chammas, a seminar participant and 27-year veteran of the Lebanese Armed Forces. “The American military are the best to learn from and are some of the most knowledgeable about the field because of their past experiences.”
#### In the Matter of the Petition of the New York Cable Railway Company.

Motion on behalf of the New York Cable Railway Company for leave to file su jplementary affidavits in the several cases affected by motions to vacate the orders app .intiug commissioners, granted on payment of ten dollars costs of opposing such motion m each of the eleven cases; aud the motions to vacate the ordersappointing commissioners donied, on payment by the Cable Company of ten dollars costs of each motiou, together with such disbursements as have occurred, without prejudice to the rights of parties opposing :ho construction of the road to present any objections that may be made on the coming in of the report for confirmation.

Brady, J., taking no part.
Date: 9/19/2015 3:57 PM EST

Name: Scott Moore A

City: Bellingham State: Washington Zip Code: 98229

Comments:

Just wanted to say I support the fiduciary proposed rule change. My financial advisor

has put his interest above my best interest, losing me retirement money while he

makes money. Thanks for making this rule change and the sooner the better.
Docket: EBSA-2010-0007 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in 

Retirement Plans 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0007-0001 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options 

Document: EBSA-2010-0007-DRAFT-0040 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: Clifton Jones 

Address: 

Pensacola, FL, 

Organization: US Citizen 

General Comment 

I am absolutely against any involuntary annuitizing of private 401K accounts. KEEP YOUR HANDS OFF 

OF MY MONEY!! If I want to buy the debt of the US Govt., I will buy Treasuries or Savings Bonds. 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION 

As of: March 01, 2010 

Received: February 21, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80aa93b6 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=Print&PrintId=0900006480aa93... 3/1/2010
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 8:18 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA; dmiller8@verizon.net

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Hello Mr. Perez, the reason for this email is to respond to an article on Financial Advisors in the Boston 

Globe on 9/13/2015 (see attachment). I’ve been in the financial services industry for nearly 20 years, 

mainly in sales and marketing roles. I’ve experienced first hand most of what is discussed in the 

article. It must stop ! I would add that Certified Financial Planner’s (CFP’s) have a responsibility to act 

in the best interest of the client, regardless of their affiliation. There are code of ethics and principles 

associated with the CFP designation. One of the principles is objectivity. They supposed to be objective 

in providing professional services to clients. Objectivity requires intellectual honesty and impartiality. It 

is an essential quality for any professional. In my experiences, most CFP’s feel this doesn’t apply to 

them. There’s too much , too many incentives, trips, money, kick backs, etc... It has to stop. All of 

it should be eliminated as it has nothing to do with providing service to the “client”

 

In the the broker/dealer area, compliance is a joke. The only concern is to make sure paperwork is 

filled out properly and that it’s ‘suitable’ . It doesn’t matter if it’s transparent that the advisor is making 

sales or ‘moving’ money for the sake of commission without regard for the client. I could write a small 

book on what I’ve seen over the years. One year there was a Broker/Dealer and FINRA audit in our 

office investigating a “fire sale”. A huge reason, if not the only reason, was for commission and 

incentives for the advisors. The audit was a complete joke. A dog and pony show.

 

If you would like to discuss, please call me on my cell phone at . In addition, I would love to 

become a consumer advocate on this issue. Are you aware of any jobs in this area ? Careers ? Please 

advise as I’m tired of seeing client’s being mislead.

 

Kind Regards,
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0782.html[7/21/2015 12:22:44 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-jkim

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0782

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Louis Lilakos

General Comment

Instead of spending time working to limit the rights of individuals to plan their retirement and use their

 retirement savings, focus on the abuses of corporate America in the various methods they use to undermine the

 position of the American citizen. Govern the way corporations compensate employees so their is a more

 equitable distribution of the earnings and how corporations are governed internally in order to reduce corruption

 and eliminate the propensity of senior executives and board members to line their own pockets at the expense of

 the taxpayer. In other words, govern where it really matters and stop picking on the little guy.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Ken Randell Blackmer, * From the 29th District Court

of Palo Pinto County

Trial Court No. 16032.

Vs. No. 11-17-00127-CR * May 9, 2019

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Stretcher, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., 

sitting by assignment)

 (Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Exhibit 24-11

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOWN
ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, John M. Palms, do hereby appoint John W. Rowe and Randall E. Mehrberg, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to sign
the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2002 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.

|                     |  |                              
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|                     |  | /s/JOHN M. PALMSJohn M. Palms
|                     |  |                              
|DATE: March 19, 2003 |  |                              

---

QuickLinks
FORM OF

12% SENIOR SUBORDINATED CONVERTIBLE NOTE

DUE DECEMBER 31, 2003

CHYRON CORPORATION

THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE "ACT"), AND ARE SUBJECT TO RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFERABILITY AS SET FORTH IN THIS CERTIFICATE.  THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED HEREBY MAY NOT BE SOLD, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF IN THE ABSENCE OF AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE ACT OR AN OPINION OF COUNSEL, REASONABLY ACCEPTABLE TO COUNSEL FOR THE COMPANY, TO THE EFFECT THAT THE PROPOSED SALE, TRANSFER, OR DISPOSITION MAY BE EFFECTUATED WITHOUT REGISTRATION UNDER THE ACT.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.A

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2002, of El Paso CGP Company (the "Company") as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald
L. Kuehn, Jr., Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, certify (i)
that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                             /s/ Ronald L. Kuehn, Jr.
                                          ----------------------------------
                                          Ronald L. Kuehn, Jr.
                                          Chairman of the Board and
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                          (Principal Executive Officer)

                                          March 31, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Unaudited Financial Statements and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,817
<SECURITIES>                                    15,759
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,101
<ALLOWANCES>                                        23
<INVENTORY>                                        709
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,858
<PP&E>                                          12,406
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,038
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,591
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,575
<BONDS>                                            104
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            70
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,617
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,591
<SALES>                                            556
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,791
<CGS>                                              464
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,143
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,067
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  26
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,364)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,364)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,364)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.00)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 178 (Friday, September 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 52554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4594]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 2 p.m., Friday, September 28, 2007.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Rule Enforcement Review.

Contact Person for More Information: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-4594 Filed 9-12-07; 2:02 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M