alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2335 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2335

 To amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act to exempt from the solid waste 
 designation all recoverable materials that are contained, collected, 
                 and returned to an industrial process.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 14, 1995

Mr. Chambliss (for himself, Mr. Callahan, Mr. Chapman, Mr. Bachus, Mr. 
Hilliard, Mr. Montgomery, Mr. Norwood, Mr. Parker, Mr. Deal of Georgia, 
 Mr. Tate, Ms. Dunn of Washington, Mr. Hayes, Mr. Peterson of Florida, 
 and Mr. Bishop) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                       the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act to exempt from the solid waste 
 designation all recoverable materials that are contained, collected, 
                 and returned to an industrial process.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF MATERIALS REUSED IN AN INDUSTRIAL PROCESS FROM 
              THE SOLID WASTE DESIGNATION UNDER THE SOLID WASTE 
              DISPOSAL ACT.

    Section 1004(27) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act (42 U.S.C. 
6903(27)) is amended by inserting after ``domestic sewage,'' the 
following: ``or solid or dissolved materials contained, collected, and 
reused in an on-site production process that prevents releases to the 
environment,''.
                                 <all>
```
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Pierre Jean Jacques Renelique, as Assignee of BRANDON CARTIE, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>American Transit Ins. Co., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Ulysses Bernard Leverett, J.), entered December 11, 2013. The order denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs. </p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. </p><p>Plaintiff billed for one unit of CPT code 99244 at $236.94 and one unit of CPT code 20553 at $600. Defendant defended this action on the ground that the fees sought exceeded the amounts permitted for those codes by the workers' compenCsation fee schedule. While plaintiff argues on appeal that the affidavit executed by defendant's coding expert "does not discuss anything specific whatsoever regarding [p]laintiff's claims," defendant also submitted an affidavit executed by its no-fault examiner, who described how the fees for the services at issue had been calculated by multiplying the appropriate "relative value" by the appropriate "conversion factor." Plaintiff's remaining argument with respect to the coding expert's affidavit and the specific argument made by plaintiff with regard to CPT code 99244 were not raised in the Civil Court, and are therefore not properly before this court.</p><p>With respect to plaintiff's final argument, which involves CPT code 20553, we find that defendant made a prima facie showing that it had used the assigned relative value for that code to calculate the sum to which plaintiff was entitled to be reimbursed. While plaintiff submitted a doctor's affidavit addressing CPT code 20553, the doctor's conclusion is based upon the unsupported allegation that CPT code 20553 is a "by report" code, meaning that it does not have a relative value. This allegation does not rebut defendant's proof that CPT code 20553 does have a relative value.</p><p>Accordingly, the order is affirmed. </p><p>Pesce, P.J., Aliotta and Solomon, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: October 13, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
EXHIBIT 21.1
                    Valero Energy Corporation
                     Schedule of Subsidiaries


Valero Coal Company                               Delaware
Valero Management Company                         Delaware
  VMGA Company                                    Texas
VNGC Holding Company                              Delaware
  Valero Natural Gas Company                      Delaware
      Valero Gas Marketing Company                Delaware
      Valero Gas Marketing Canada Inc.            Alberta, Canada
      Valero Gas Storage Company                  Delaware
      Valero Hydrocarbons Company                 Delaware
      Valero Field Services Company               Delaware
      Valero Power Services Company               Delaware
      Valero Storage and Transfer Company         Delaware
      Valero Transmission Company                 Delaware
          VT Company                              Delaware
      Energy Investments Company                  Delaware
Valero Producing Company                          Delaware
Valero Refining and Marketing Company             Delaware
  Valero Javelina Company                         Delaware
  Valero Marketing and Supply Company             Delaware
  Valero Refining Company                         Delaware
      Valero MTBE Investments Company             Delaware
      Valero MTBE Operating Company               Delaware
      Valero Mediterranean Company                Delaware
      Valero Mexico Company                       Delaware
      Valero Technical Services Company           Delaware

  Valero Natural Gas Partners, L.P.               Delaware
      ValeroTex, L.P.                             Delaware
      Energy Investments, L.P.                    Delaware
      Valero Management Partnership, L.P.         Delaware
          Valero Transmission, L.P.               Delaware
          Valero Hydrocarbons, L.P.               Delaware
          Valero Marketing, L.P.                  Delaware
          Valero Industrial Gas, L.P.             Delaware
          Valero Gas Marketing, L.P.              Delaware
          VLDC, L.P.                              Delaware
          Reata Industrial Gas, L.P.              Delaware
          Rivercity Gas, L.P.                     Delaware
1210-AB32-2-1322.html[7/26/2015 1:35:57 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvw-aahb

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1817

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Robert Fullerton

General Comment

I am perfectly capable of planning my own retirement, selecting the level of risk I am comfortable with. I do

 NOT want some faceless bureaucrat deciding what's good for me.
###### Editorial Note on Part 393

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 393 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 393.44 Front brake lines, protection.

On every bus, if equipped with air brakes, the braking system shall be so constructed that in the event any brake line to any of the front wheels is broken, the driver can apply the brakes on the rear wheels despite such breakage. The means used to apply the brakes may be located forward of the driver's seat as long as it can be operated manually by the driver when the driver is properly restrained by any seat belt assembly provided for use. Every bus shall meet this requirement or comply with the regulations in effect at the time of its manufacture.

[53 FR 49400, Dec. 7, 1988]
1210-AB32-2-1045.html[7/23/2015 3:20:34 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-xqyz

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1537

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Shirley Train

Address:

1433 N Church Drive

Bellbrook, OH, 45305

Email: shirleytrain@gmail.com

Phone: 9378488721

General Comment

It seems that Obama wants to make it hard for the average American to retire! The Department of Labor is

 starting to enact regulations that would restrict how we use own money for our retirement. We are smart enough

 to plan for our own retirement. We do NOT need a nanny state telling us what to do; we want to be free to make

 our own decisions about our own savings!
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.20 CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS TERM SHEET  DIRECTOR AND COMMITTEE MEMBER FEE SCHEDULE 
2004 ANNUAL RETAINERS *Directors  $25,000.00 Audit Committee Members  $25,000.00 (Chairperson receives $35,000.00) Incentive Compensation Committee Members  $10,000.00 (Chairperson receives $15,000.00) Finance Committee Members  $4,000.00 Executive Committee Members  $4,000.00 MEETING FEE A per-meeting fee of $600.00 was paid to the Chairpersons of the Audit and Incentive
Compensation Committees for each meeting in 2004 with management, external auditors, advisors and
other appropriate persons held to carry out their respective duties between regularly scheduled
meetings of the respective Committees.  *Directors who are employees of CNAF or any of its subsidiaries do not receive annual retainers for
Board of Directors or Committee service.
*The case is unanimously ordered submitted without oral argument pursuant to

Fed. R. App. P. 34(a) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. This order and judgment is not binding

precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral

estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments;

nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th

Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

JUL 21 1998

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

PATRICK WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SHARON LEVANSAILOR,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 98-4006

(D.C. No. 94-CV-426)

(District of Utah)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before ANDERSON, McKAY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

Patrick Williams, an inmate at the Salt Lake County Metro Jail, filed a

lawsuit against Sharon Levansailor, a medical technician employed by the Metro

Jail, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985. Williams alleges that defendant

violated his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment by telling a racist joke in

front of him and other inmates. The district court granted summary judgment in
- 2 -

favor of defendant, adopting the findings of the Magistrate’s Report and

Recommendation. We affirm.

Plaintiff, claims the defendant, while distributing medication at the Metro

Jail, called some white inmates to the bars of the cell and asked if they wanted to

hear a good joke. When Williams asked what was happening, defendant allegedly

responded that she was telling a joke about “you guys” and laughed. According

to plaintiff, defendant then proceeded to tell a racially derogatory joke that

offended and embarrassed Williams.

This conduct, if true, is deplorable and unprofessional. It does not,

however, constitute a violation of plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment rights. See

Collins v. Cundy, 603 F.2d 825, 827 (10th Cir. 1979) (verbal abuse alone is not

actionable under § 1983); see also Oltarzewski v. Ruggiero, 830 F.2d 136, 139

(9th Cir. 1987) (same) (quoting Collins, 603 F.2d at 827); Patton v. Przybylski,

822 F.2d 697, 700 (7th Cir. 1987) (use of derogatory racial epithets does not

violate Fourteenth Amendment); Black Spotted Horse v. Else, 767 F.2d 516, 517

(8th Cir. 1985) (use of racial slurs only violates Fourteenth Amendment if

coupled with physical force or other egregious conduct); cf. Ivey v. Wilson, 832

F.2d 950, 955 (6th Cir. 1987) (verbal abuse does not violate Eighth Amendment).

Plaintiff also asserts a claim alleging disparate treatment and failure to

train. These issues were not raised before the district court and he may not raise
- 3 -

them for the first time on appeal. See Lyons v. Jefferson Bank & Trust, 994 F.2d

716, 722 (10th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Carlos F. Lucero

Circuit Judge
June 27, 2011

MEMORANDUM

From: William H. Maxwell

EPA/SPPD/ESG (D243-01)

To: Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234

Subject: Meeting with American Thoracic Society

Attendees :

See attached.

Discussion :

A general discussion of the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards was held.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0930.html[7/21/2015 6:24:48 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-8ihg

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0930

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Sheila Tickle

General Comment

This is too let Obama know we as American are able to make our own decision on how we will spend the money

 we work for and save for ! You (Obama) needs to quit trying to micro-manage us and telling us how to spend

 our money!
#### § 29.412 May the Department increase the funds included in the funding agreement if necessary to carry out the Program?

The Department may increase the funds included in the funding agreement if necessary to carry out the Program. However, the Department and the Tribe must agree to any transfer of funds to the Tribe unless otherwise provided for in the funding agreement.
ServingSutterandYubaCountiesOctober14,2014AndrewSteckelRulemakingOfficeChiefU.S.EPARegionIXsteckel.andrew@epa.gov1007LiveOakBlvd.SuiteB-3YubaCity,CA95991(530)634-7659FAX(530)634-7660www.fraqmd.orgChristopherD.Brown,AICPAirPollutionControlOfficerRe:ClarificationofFRAQMDRule3.17WoodHeatingDevicesSIPsubmittalDearMr.Steckel,TheFeatherRiverAirQualityManagementDistrictisforwardingthisclarificationofourApril11,2014lettersubmittingRule3.17WoodHeatingDevicestotheU.S.EPAasaSIPrevision.OnJuly25,2014,theAirResourcesBoardforwardedRule3.17totheU.S.EPAasaSIPrevision.TheJuly25,2014submittalincludedaversionoftherulethatcorrectlyidentifiedseveralportionsofRule3.17thatarenotfederallyenforceable.Today'sletterisintendedtomoreclearlydescribethoseportionstominimizeanypotentialconfusion.Specifically,weintendtoexcludefromtheSIPsubmittal:•SectionE.8-"orothermethodapprovedbytheAirPollutionControlOfficer."•SectionF.2.e-"Ithasbeendeterminedtomeettheparticulatematteremissionstandardofnomorethan4.1gramsperhourparticulatematteremissionforcatalyticand7.5gramsperhourfornoncatalyticappliances,andisapprovedinwritingbytheAirPollutionControlOfficer."TheDistrictwouldalsoliketoclarifythatSectionF.4isnotexcludedfromthesubmittedversionoftherule.Thissectioncontainsvoluntarymeasuresandtheemissionreductionsachievedfromthismeasurewerenotreliedonforattainmentpurposes.However,wewouldliketokeepthissectionintheRuleatthistime.IfyouhaveanyquestionspleasecontactMs.SondraSpaethe,AirQualityPlanner,at(530)634-7659ext210.Regards,ChristopherD.Brown,AICPAirPollutionControlOfficerAttachments:Rule3.17SIPVersionCDB/slsFile:Chron
-----Original Message----- 

From: tedbolander@gmail.com [mailto:tedbolander@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 12:02 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Ted Bolander 

8349 Hidden Creek Drive 

Flushing, MI 48433
#### James Talcott, Respondent, v. Jacob Smith and Michael Smith, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Brady. J.
-78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0 -75.5

 37.5

 38.0

 38.5

 39.0

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/28

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 28 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.86 N 77.06 W Meters AGL
! " ! # % & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 & 2
+ 2 3 2



### 4 1 5 6 6 , 7 6 89 : 6 ; 8< = 6 > < % # 3 % ? @ : % % , 6 A 6 8 4 A , = B C< 87 D> < E ; , F E E 6 > 9 E 6 , G E ; 8?! " ! # % & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 & 2
+ 2 3 2 !



### 4 1 5 6 6 , 7 6 89 : 6 ; 8< = 6 > < % # 3 % ? @ : % % , 6 A 6 8 4 A , = B C< 87 D> < E ; , F E E 6 > 9 E 6 , G E ; 8?! " ! # % & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 & 2
+ 2 3 2 "



### 4 1 5 6 6 , 7 6 89 : 6 ; 8< = 6 > < % # 3 % ? @ : % % , 6 A 6 8 4 A , = B C< 87 D> < E ; , F E E 6 > 9 E 6 , G E ; 8?! " ! # % & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 & 2
+ 2 3 2 #



### 4 1 5 6 6 , 7 6 89 : 6 ; 8< = 6 > < % # 3 % ? @ : % % , 6 A 6 8 4 A , = B C< 87 D> < E ; , F E E 6 > 9 E 6 , G E ; 8?! " ! # % & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 & 2
+ 2 3 2 $



### 4 1 5 6 6 , 7 6 89 : 6 ; 8< = 6 > < % # 3 % ? @ : % % , 6 A 6 8 4 A , = B C< 87 D> < E ; , F E E 6 > 9 E 6 , G E ; 8?! " ! # % & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 & 2
+ 2 3 2 %



### 4 1 5 6 6 , 7 6 89 : 6 ; 8< = 6 > < % # 3 % ? @ : % % , 6 A 6 8 4 A , = B C< 87 D> < E ; , F E E 6 > 9 E 6 , G E ; 8?! " ! # % & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 & 2
+ 2 3 2 &



### 4 1 5 6 6 , 7 6 89 : 6 ; 8< = 6 > < % # 3 % ? @ : % % , 6 A 6 8 4 A , = B C< 87 D> < E ; , F E E 6 > 9 E 6 , G E ; 8?! " ! # % & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 & 2
+ 2 3 2 '



### 4 1 5 6 6 , 7 6 89 : 6 ; 8< = 6 > < % # 3 % ? @ : % % , 6 A 6 8 4 A , = B C< 87 D> < E ; , F E E 6 > 9 E 6 , G E ; 8?! " ! # % & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 & 2
+ 2 3 2 (



### 4 1 5 6 6 , 7 6 89 : 6 ; 8< = 6 > < % # 3 % ? @ : % % , 6 A 6 8 4 A , = B C< 87 D> < E ; , F E E 6 > 9 E 6 , G E ; 8?! " ! # % & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 & 2
+ 2 3 2 )



### 4 1 5 6 6 , 7 6 89 : 6 ; 8< = 6 > < % # 3 % ? @ : % % , 6 A 6 8 4 A , = B C< 87 D> < E ; , F E E 6 > 9 E 6 , G E ; 8?
Editorial Note on Part 385
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 385.4 Matter incorporated by reference. ( a ) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved incorporation by reference (IBR) material is available for inspection at the FMCSA and at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Contact FMCSA at: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Office of Enforcement and Compliance, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590; Attention: Chief, Compliance Division at (202) 366-1812. For information on inspection at NARA, visit *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html* or email *fr.inspection@nara.gov .* The material may be obtained from the source in the following paragraph of this section.
( b ) Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance (CVSA), 99 M Street SE, Suite 1025, Washington, DC 20003, telephone (202) 998-1002, *www.cvsa.org .* ( 1 ) “North American Standard Out-of-Service Criteria and Level VI Inspection Procedures and Out-of-Service Criteria for Commercial Highway Vehicles Transporting Transuranics and Highway Route Controlled Quantities of Radioactive Materials as defined in 49 CFR part 173.403,” April 1, 2024; incorporation by reference approved for § 385.415(b).
( 2 ) “Operational Policy 4: Inspector Training and Certification”, Revised April 29, 2021 (CVSA Operational Policy 4); incorporation by reference approved for § 385.207. (Also available at *www.fmcsa.dot.gov/certification*).
[87 FR 78582, Dec. 22, 2022, as amended at 88 FR 77014, Nov. 8, 2023; 89 FR 67562, Aug. 21, 2024]
#### § 178.346-2 Material and thickness of material.

The type and thickness of material for DOT 406 specification cargo tanks must conform to [§ 178.345-2](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-178.345-2), but in no case may the thickness be less than that determined by the minimum thickness requirements in [§ 178.320(a)](/on/2024-09-24/title-49/section-178.320#p-178.320(a)). The following Tables I and II identify the specified minimum thickness values to be employed in that determination.

Table I—Specified Minimum Thickness of Heads (or Bulkheads and Baffles When Used as Tank Reinforcement) Using Mild Steel (MS), High Strength Low Alloy Steel (HSLA), Austenitic Stainless Steel (SS), or Aluminum (AL)—Expressed in Decimals of an Inch After Forming

| Material | Volume capacity in gallons per inch of length | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 14 or less | | | Over 14 to 23 | | | Over 23 | | |
| MS | HSLA SS | AL | MS | HSLA SS | AL | MS | HSLA SS | AL |
| Thickness | .100 | .100 | .160 | .115 | .115 | .173 | .129 | .129 | .187 |

Table II—Specified Minimum Thickness of Shell Using Mild Steel (MS), High Strength Low Alloy Steel (HSLA), Austenitic Stainless Steel (SS), or Aluminum (AL)—Expressed in Decimals of an Inch After Forming1

| Cargo tank motor vehicle rated capacity (gallons) | MS | SS/HSLA | AL |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| More than 0 to at least 4,500 | 0.100 | 0.100 | 0.151 |
| More than 4,500 to at least 8,000 | 0.115 | 0.100 | 0.160 |
| More than 8,000 to at least 14,000 | 0.129 | 0.129 | 0.173 |
| More than 14,000 | 0.143 | 0.143 | 0.187 |
| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 Maximum distance between bulkheads, baffles, or ring stiffeners shall not exceed 60 inches. | | | |

[Amdt. 178-89, [54 FR 25028](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/54-FR-25028), June 12, 1989, as amended at [55 FR 37064](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/55-FR-37064), Sept. 7, 1990; Amdt. 178-105, [59 FR 55176](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/59-FR-55176), Nov. 3, 1994; [68 FR 19285](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/68-FR-19285), Apr. 18, 2003]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1134.html[7/22/2015 2:30:00 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-5xs0

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1134

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Sandra Van Brunt

General Comment

Dear Sirs,

Please don't mess with my 401K Retirement. Quit helping! I am perfectly able to manage my own retirement.

Regards,

Sandra Van Brunt