alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CDSI'S
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE
NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       4,330,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               87,916,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           101,586,200
<PP&E>                                      79,579,700
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,243,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             187,450,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       56,506,700
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       626,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  78,307,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               187,450,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           304,391,900
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              285,667,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             145,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             18,575,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                 7,419,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         11,156,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                11,156,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.80
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 396
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 396 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 396.15 Driveaway-towaway operations and inspections. ( a ) *General.* Every motor carrier, with respect to motor vehicles engaged in driveaway-towaway operations, shall comply with the requirements of this part. Exception: Maintenance records required by § 396.3, the vehicle inspection report required by § 396.11, and the periodic inspection required by § 396.17 of this part shall not be required for any vehicle which is part of the shipment being delivered.
( b ) *Pre-trip inspection.* Before the beginning of any driveaway-towaway operation of motor vehicles in combination, the motor carrier shall make a careful inspection and test to ascertain that: ( 1 ) The tow-bar or saddle-mount connections are properly secured to the towed and towing vehicle;
( 2 ) They function adequately without cramping or binding of any of the parts; and
( 3 ) The towed motor vehicle follows substantially in the path of the towing vehicle without whipping or swerving.
( c ) *Post-trip inspection.* Motor carriers shall maintain practices to ensure that following completion of any trip in driveaway-towaway operation of motor vehicles in combination, and before they are used again, the tow-bars and saddle-mounts are disassembled and inspected for worn, bent, cracked, broken, or missing parts. Before reuse, suitable repair or replacement shall be made of any defective parts and the devices shall be properly reassembled.
[44 FR 38526, July 2, 1979, as amended at 53 FR 49410, Dec. 7, 1988; 53 FR 49968, Dec. 12, 1988; 78 FR 58485, Sept. 24, 2013; 84 FR 51435, Sept. 30, 2019]
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1243.html[7/22/2015 9:14:23 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jve-slm7

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1243

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: S. Mark Whittemore

General Comment

I am trying to not be a burden to my family and society. Let me handle my retirement.
From: Tom McConnell [mailto:tomtmc@earthlink.net] 

Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2015 8:37 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32 Comments

DOL,

I am a retired person that lives off of my distributions from my 401K and IRAs. In my opinion it is a 

mistake to not allow self directed investors from using options to enhance their return on their 401K and 

IRA investments.

I currently use covered calls to enhance my return in my deferred accounts and I also use cash secured 

puts to allow me to reduce my cost of purchasing stocks or ETFs.

Please do not eliminate the use of options in deferred accounts.

Tom McConnell
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 9/7/15 

Received: September 04, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8kxw-smdm

Comments Due: September 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule- Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-5140

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Andy Anonymous

General Comment

I think people should be able to trade options in retirement accounts. Buying puts, calls, spreads, 

etc. They should be allowed to sell cash-secured puts and credit spreads, as long as they have the 

cash to back it up. 

No selling naked calls or anything with an undefined risk.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDebris/Ice/TPS Assessment and Photographic Analysis for Shuttle Mission STS-39A Debris/Ice/TPS (thermal protection system) assessment and photographic analysis was conducted for Space Shuttle Mission STS-39. Debris inspections of the flight elements and launch pad were performed before and after launch. Ice/frost conditions on the external tank were assessed by the use of computer programs, nomographs, and infrared scanner data during cryogenic loading of the vehicle followed by on-pad visual inspection. High speed photography of launch was analyzed to identify ice/debris anomalies. The debris/ice/TPS conditions and photographic analysis of Mission STS-39, and their overall effect on the Space Shuttle Program are documented.Document ID19910014908Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsKatnik, Gregory N.*(NASA John F. Kennedy Space Center Cocoa Beach, FL, United States)*Higginbotham, Scott A.*(NASA John F. Kennedy Space Center Cocoa Beach, FL, United States)*Davis, J. Bradley*(NASA John F. Kennedy Space Center Cocoa Beach, FL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1991Subject CategorySpace TransportationReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-103820NAS 1.15:103820Accession Number91N24221Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910014908.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
March 31, 1999 financial statements and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000707606
<NAME> SYSTEMS & COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY CORP.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       4,748,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              151,267,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,238,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           192,338,000
<PP&E>                                    105,851,0000
<DEPRECIATION>                              38,824,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             316,117,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       67,940,000
<BONDS>                                     78,200,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       364,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 169,613,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               316,117,000
<SALES>                                    225,539,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           226,847,000
<CGS>                                      154,273,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              209,463,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,355,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             15,029,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 6,391,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,638,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,638,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26
        

</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMulti-objective shape and material optimization of composite structures including dampingA multi-objective optimal design methodology is developed for light-weight, low cost composite structures of improved dynamic performance. The design objectives include minimization of resonance amplitudes (or maximization of modal damping), weight, and material cost. The design vector includes micromechanics, laminate, and structural shape parameters. Performance constraints are imposed on static displacements, dynamic amplitudes, and natural frequencies. The effects of damping on the dynamics of composite structures are incorporated. Preliminary applications on a cantilever composite beam illustrated that only the proposed multi-objective optimization, as opposed to single objective functions, simultaneously improved all objectives. The significance of composite damping in the design of advanced composite structures was also demonstrated, indicating the design methods based on undamped dynamics may fail to improve the dynamic performance near resonances.Document ID19900011816Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsSaravanos, D. A.*(Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, OH., United States)*Chamis, Christos C.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryComposite MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:102579E-5410NASA-TM-102579Meeting InformationMeeting: Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials ConferenceLocation: Long Beach, CACountry: United StatesStart Date: April 2, 1990End Date: April 4, 1990Sponsors:AHS,ASME,AIAA,ASCE,ASCAccession Number90N21132Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-1BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900011816.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.38

                                     [LOGO]

                                 March 1, 2004


Larry Spanley


Dear Larry:

     The full year 2003 results ended with a pre-tax profit of $5,769,150. This
allows the company to pay the 25% bonus level which was the $5,500,000 pre-tax
level. Enclosed is a check representing your bonus for 2003. We are thrilled to
be able to share the success of the company's recent performance with you in
this way.

     The bonus plan for 2004 has been adjusted to reflect the goals for the
company now that we have raised additional capital and become a public entity.
Your bonus will be based on the profit after-tax using a standard corporate tax
rate.

<Table>
<S>     <C>                                                                        <C>
   5%   of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $1,066,000
  10%   of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $1,566,000
  15%   of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $2,066,000
  20%   of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $2,566,000
  25%   of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $3,066,000
33.3%   of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $3,766,000
41.7%   of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $4,666,000
  50%   of your cumulative salary if the company achieves an after-tax profit of   $5,666,000
</Table>

     The bonus period will be the fiscal months of January 2004 through December
2004. You must be an active employee of Bakers Footwear Group at the time
bonuses are paid to be eligible to receive your bonus.

     We are excited about the challenges and prospects in the coming year. We
hope it's profitable for all of us and our shareholders.



                                         Sincerely,


                                         /s/ Peter Edison

                                         Peter Edison



 2815 Scott Avenue-Saint Louis, Missouri 63103-(314)621-0699-Fax (314)621-0708
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/29

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 29 Jun 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.81 N 76.74 W Meters AGL
1210-AB32-2-1313.html[7/26/2015 1:24:19 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvv-n1rl

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1808

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: John Henry Alex Lankford

General Comment

I do not want the Government to tell me how to plan for my retirement!

Stay the hell out of my personal life!
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6779

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CLARENCE SHELDON JUPITER, a/k/a Star,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Western District of 

Virginia, Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (5:93-cr-00004-SGW1)

Submitted: August 22, 2012 Decided: August 27, 2012

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence Sheldon Jupiter, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray 

Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Clarence Sheldon Jupiter appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motion for sentence reduction pursuant to 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find 

no abuse of discretion. See United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 

183, 186 (4th Cir. 2010) (providing standard). Accordingly, we 

affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1218.html[7/22/2015 3:57:31 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvd-t1po

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1218

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Jeff Chan

Address:

704 Lakechime Dr

Sunnyvale, CA, 94089

Email: bssybeep@yahoo.com

Phone: 4083388254

General Comment

This law is unnecessary and harmful. I have always managed my own 401K and IRA successfully and need to

 continue to do so. Any law (such as this one) that hinders or restricts our retirement future, planning, and

 management is dangerous and must not be implemented.

In closing, I urge that this law be discarded.

thank you,
Editorial Note on Part 587
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 587 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 587.17 Construction. ( a ) The main honeycomb block is bonded to the backing sheet with adhesive such that the cell axes are perpendicular to the sheet. The cladding sheet is adhesively bonded to the front surface of the main honeycomb block. The top and bottom surfaces of the cladding sheet are not bonded to the main honeycomb block but are positioned close to it. The cladding sheet is adhesively bonded to the backing sheet at the mounting flanges. The bumper element honeycomb is adhesively bonded to the front of the cladding sheet such that the cell axes are perpendicular to the sheet. The bottom of the bumper element honeycomb is flush with the bottom surface of the cladding sheet. The bumper facing sheet is adhesively bonded to the front of the bumper element honeycomb.
( b ) The bumper element honeycomb is divided into three equal sections by means of two horizontal slots. These slots are cut through the entire depth of the bumper element and extend the whole width of the bumper. The slots are cut using a saw; their width is the width of the blade used which do not exceed 4.0 mm (0.16 in).
( c ) Clearance holes for mounting the deformable face are drilled in the cladding sheet mounting flanges (shown in Figure 5). The holes are 20 mm (0.79 in) in diameter. Five holes are drilled in the top flange at a distance of 40 mm (1.57 in) from the top edge of the flange and five holes in the bottom flange at a distance of 40 mm (1.6 in) from the bottom edge of the flange. The holes are spaced at 100 mm (3.9 in), 300 mm (11.8 in), 500 mm (19.7 in), 700 mm (27.5 in), 900 mm (35.4 in) horizontally, from either edge of the barrier. All holes are drilled within ±1 mm (0.04 in) of the nominal distances.
#### Ashley, Winne, Appellant v. Moses Breckon, Respondent.

— Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barker, J.;

Haight, J., not sitting.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 28, 2014

h0527 

# Order

Clerk May 28, 2014

149333 & (26)

ESTATE OF MOORY TURNER,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 149333

COA: 319305

Wayne CC: 13

- 006256

- AV

LAVERN HOLLOWAY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED.

The application for leave to appeal the March 5, 2014 order of the Court of Ap peals is

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented

should be reviewed by this Court.
#### DANIEL J. NOYES, Respondent, *v.*JACOB F. WYCKOFF, Appellant.

*Chattel mortgage*— a *tender of the amount secured thereby, made by one who purchases the chattels subject to tKe payment of the mortgage, is ineffectual to discharge the lien.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the report of a referee.

The action was brought to recover damages for the conversion of a quantity of iron ore. The defendant justified the taking under a chattel mortgage given by a former owner, and the plaintiff claimed *467under a bill of sale subsequently executed by tbe mortgagor. The plaintiff claimed that the lien of the mortgage was destroyed by a tender made by him.

With reference to this the court at General Term said: “ The conversion rests upon a subsequent tender by the owner of the mortgage equity. Mrs. Fitzgerald gave the mortgage and it was collateral to the note. The plaintiff bought the equity with full knowledge of the mortgage and in express terms subject to it. liis tender fails for two reasons : First. The mortgage is a part of the consideration, and the property was taken subject to its payment, although there was no express covenant to pay the mortgage debt in the bill of sale. Second. A stranger to the title cannot make a tender and destroy the lien. A tender leaves the debt. Mrs. Fitzger-’ aid must pay her note if this tender is good. A tender by the owner of the equity is not good as against the interests of the mortgagee. *(Harris*v. Jex, 66 Barb., 232.) A chattel or personal mortgage differs in its structure and effect entirely from a mortgage upon real estate. The real estate mortgage is only a lien and conveys no title whatever. The personal mortgage transfers the title at once subject to a defeasance by the performance of the condition annexed. A tender before or after due, by the owner of the equity, would not destroy the lien. There is strictly speaking no. lien. There is a transfer of title; and only by keeping the tender good can the property be held free of the mortgage.”

The judgment should be reversed, and a new trial granted, costs to abide event and order of reference vacated.

*William T.*Butler, for the appellant.

*John L.*Hill, for the respondent.

Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

DyeMAn, J., concurred; Pratt, J., dissented.

Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide event, order of reference vacated. , •