alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(June 10, 1913.)

#### M. I. MEEKER et al., Appellants, v. J. J. TRAPPETT, Respondent.

[133 Pac. 117.]

Sueeiciency or Evidence.

1. Evidence in this case examined and *held*sufficient to support the verdict and judgment.

*199APPEAL from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District for Bear Lake County. Hon. Alfred Budge, Judge.

Action for debt. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appealed.

*Affirmed.*

Thomas L. Glenn, for Appellants.

John A. Bagley, for Respondent.

Counsel cite no authorities.

AILSHIE, C. J.

This action was instituted by the appellant to recover commission for the sale of real estate. Defendant answered and filed a cross-complaint, claiming a balance of $15 due from plaintiff to defendant on account. The case went to trial and a verdict was returned against the plaintiff and in favor of the defendant on his cross-complaint, and judgment was thereupon entered.

The only question presented on this appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence. The preponderance of the evidence on the cause of action set forth in the plaintiff’s complaint is decidedly in favor of the appellant, but there is substantial evidence supporting the contention of the respondent, and under the statute (sec. 4824) and the established rule in this state, this court would not be justified in reversing the judgment on this account.

There is also a sharp conflict in the evidence concerning the cause of action set forth in defendant’s cross-complaint. The jury, however, has also found that issue in favor of the defendant and there is evidence which supports the verdict.

For these reasons the judgment in this case must be affirmed, and it is so ordered. Costs awarded in favor of respondent.

Sullivan and Stewart, JJ., concur.
Ex 4.9  Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLC







EXHIBIT 4.9 














CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS  



We hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in the registration statement on Form F 80 (the “Registration
Statement”) of First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (the “Company”), as amended on
March 21, 2006, of our auditors’ report dated February 24, 2006, on the consolidated
balance sheets of the Company as at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 and the
consolidated statements of earnings and retained earnings and cash flows for the years
then ended. 



We also consent to the references to
us under the headings “Experts” and “Documents Filed as part of the
Registration Statement” in the Registration Statement. 




/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP  




Chartered Accountants 




Vancouver, British
Columbia, Canada
March 21, 2006
From: chris murray [mailto:chrismurray3@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 3:38 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Fiduciary Rule

Please stop the Fiduciary Rule. This rule will be detrimental to my business, my clients, and 

most importantly, middle class America.

Thank you
[Civ. No. 2787.

Fourth Dist.

Sept. 15, 1941.]

#### PAUL BOLTON, Appellant, v. R. S. LOGAN, Respondent.

*740W. W. Kaye for Appellant.

Mayoek & Lester and Welburn Mayoek for Respondent.

MUNDO, J.,

*pro tem.*— The opinion delivered upon a former appeal herein (30 Cal. App. (2d) 30 [85 Pac. (2d) 546, 86 Pac. (2d) 365]) contains a sufficient statement of the nature of the controversy. In that opinion we held that the trial court should have admitted the decree of foreclosure and the sheriff’s deed as evidence tending to prove defendant’s title. They were muniments in an asserted title. (See *Barr*v. *Gratz’s Executors,*4 Wheat. (U. S.) 213 [4 L. Ed. 553].)

Upon the second trial the judgment roll in the foreclosure proceedings and the sheriff’s deed given pursuant to sale thereunder, were received in evidence. According to *Purser*v. *Cady,*120 Cal. 214 [52 Pac. 489], it is necessary, if not established by the complaint or the judgment of foreclosure, to establish by proper evidence the time at which the lien accrued. Here the complaint and the decree of foreclosure set forth these facts and it therefore was unnecessary for defendant to prove by other evidence the execution of the mortgage or its assignment.

Plaintiff in rebuttal sought to attack the foreclosure decree by introducing evidence over the objection of the defendant attacking the validity of the mortgage and the alleged collusion involved in its foreclosure. The court admitted this evidence but did not make a finding thereon. Judgment upon the second trial went for defendant and plaintiff appeals. The court properly admitted the evidence attacking the validity of the mortgage and the collusion involved in its foreclosure, but erred in not making a finding on this material issue. *(Bird*v. *Murphy,*72 Cal. App. 39 [236 Pac. 154]; *Krug*v. *John E. Yoakum Co.,*27 Cal. App. (2d) 91 [80 Pac. (2d) 492], citing *Title Insurance & Trust Co.*v. *California Development Co.,*171 Cal. 173 [152 Pac. 542].)

*741For this reason the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with instructions to the trial court to make findings as to the validity of the mortgage and the foreclosure and enter judgment accordingly.

Barnard, P. J., and Griffin, J., concurred.

Respondent’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied November 13, 1941.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Alfacell  Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Kuslima Shogen,
Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chairman of the Board of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date:  March 12, 2007

                                           /s/ Kuslima Shogen
                                           ------------------
                                           Name:   Kuslima Shogen
                                           Title:  Chief Executive Officer
                                                   (Principal Executive Officer)


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Alfacell  Corporation  and will be retained by Alfacell  Corporation
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.
exv10w23a



 







Exhibit 10.23a




AMENDMENT TO EQUIPMENT LEASE AGREEMENT




     This AMENDMENT TO EQUIPMENT LEASE AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made effective as of the
15th day of September, 2005, and is entered into by and between (i) the BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS on behalf of THE UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES (“Hospital”),
and (ii) GK FINANCING, LLC, a California limited liability company (“GKF”),



Recitals:




     WHEREAS, GKF and Hospital executed an Equipment Lease Agreement dated October 29th, 1998 (the
“Lease”), and desire to amend the Lease as set forth herein.



     NOW THEREFORE, for valuable consideration received, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:



Agreement:




     1. Defined Terms. Unless otherwise defined herein, the capitalized terms used herein
shall have the same meanings set forth in the Lease.



     2. Hospital’s Direct Cost Component. Effective as of the date of this Amendment,
Exhibit 8.1 of the Lease shall be deleted and replaced with Exhibit 8.1 attached hereto.



     3. Full Force and Effect. Except as amended by this Amendment, all of the terms and
provisions of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have this Amendment executed as of the date first written
above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	GK FINANCING, LLC	 	 	 	BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS on behalf of	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	THE UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

Name:

Title:

	 	Craig K. Tagawa
 

Craig K. Tagawa
Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 	By:

Name:

Title:
	 	Richard A. Pierson
 

Richard A. Pierson
Vice Chancellor for Clinical Programs
	 	 






1









 






Exhibit 8.1



HOSPITAL’S DIRECT COST COMPONENT




	 	 	 
	Registered nurse

	 	*
	 
	 	 
	Recovery room

	 	*
	 
	 	 
	Hospital daily charge

	 	*
	 
	 	 
	Hospital, including ventilator daily charge

	 	*
	 
	 	 
	MRI procedure

	 	*
	 
	 	 
	CT procedure

	 	*
	 
	 	 
	Angiography procedure

	 	*
	 
	 	 
	Physicist

	 	*
	 
	 	 
	Locum tenens expense

	 	*






2
zifirm 

October 27,2010 

Attn: Phyllis Borzi 

Assistant Secretary of Labor 

U.S. Deparbnent of Labor 

200 Constitution Ave., NW 

Washington, DC 20210 

Dear Ms. Boni, 

- nankyou. 

Z-Fjm LC 

120 LgkesldeAvs,SultelOl : SeatMe,WA98122 

Tel: 206.812.7874 : Fax: 206.668.0717 

www.zflrm.com 

I read recently of the plans to require financial consultants to be properly defined as fiduciaries. 

How very appropriate. 

1 manage a small company retirement plan (aka KEOGH or Profit Sharing plan), and have for 

several years. Every manner of financial "consubnt" and "advisor" comes knocking at our door. 

51 .s:. Y a!sf~ ~q~ltr ~;~-sj.~*+Gli;C.-j 

~~fiksi:~ of their compensation schemes is shocking! "There is no fee for this service," and 

-&v&ryhh&-lid~-in the book. We show them the door, because we dont even know where to 

start. While the legalities of our plan are managed by a titled, repubble firm (QPA, QKA, etc), lJre 

;Inv&ment s/de hss hls&&/& been under-swed we wnnof idenfr'm ratable sourns 

of &/ie. We tend to trust folks that we have business relationships with (lawyers, CPAs, etc), 

' ' ,:!because we . , know that: . . ... ...' .' I.' 

. .' . 2 ' .... ,. - 

- We are in control (because we pay them, they answer to us) 

- Their professional assoclatlons malntain standards of conduct and give us recourse 

- -- 

In the financial services world, we have yet to have a relationship that is as clear as that which we 

have with the legal world. . _. . . , I?' 

, . , . 

Thank you again for taking this common-sense approach. 'U 

. ,.: - ' : ! . - ;:.-.- , . I '0. 

, : ' , '+.-. 'L 1. i m. 

I. . 

. . ' .'. . " . . .- . . r.- '.. , ' * 

. ., . -54' >'..*: , ,5..; * ,; , t*: . a.- > :. 

, . . ,, -. - 4.. .,& TfL !;;;!:j!;+v,;*.,,, . , * ,<.> -..; .:, -:r;.5;i:;., *.;!.:!.I (&++i' l..;&:<', ;.-,:r.';' -* 

,=J,..:. -L'$>.l . A ; &>,$iJ ?tLlrJ;.:l ,\j;jc,Ll: ,s 

;$- :JL\ h+?i.: $I. &!!> %~",!55',~ 9L'q 

.:. . 2-Firm ,l,E (and a plan administratorltrustee) . , ., . .. - ,. , . . . , .. .-, - - mi:,:. ,,:L-:iJ , mrmf : ;.:',!zn, .;;,:-;:? ::*:.i:- , .. A,;%. j.1. -:: .?I.,- L.. , . - - .. .;. 

- . . . .. . . .- ,nn.9 L. y ,.;~+; + 

, I-.. . , .' *m: 

cc: SEC: George S. Canellos, Regional Director, 3 World Financial Center, Suite 400 rn amm 

Ik ,New York, NY 10281-1022 *+.am
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

132413(54) Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, RANDY BUES, Deceased, by MONICA BEUS, Justices Surviving Spouse, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 132413 

 COA: 258995 
 WCAC: 03-000316 

BROAD, VOGT & CONANT, INC., STAR

INSURANCE COMPANY, and 

MEADOWBROOK CLAIMS SERVICE, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 28, 

2007 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

KELLY, J., would grant reconsideration. 

d0830 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2007 

 Clerk
1210-AB32-2-1208.html[7/24/2015 8:19:22 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvs-fx4c

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1703

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: BERTHA-MARIE REYBURN

Address:

8268 BROAD ST.N.E.

98837

Email: berthamarie.reyburn@gmail.com

Phone: 509-762-5942

General Comment

I JUST LOST EVERYTHING IN WILD FIRE..

I HAVE HAD EXPERANCE AND WOULD LIKE TO SHARE..,I SENT ON 200 CONCACTS BUT MY

 LETTER WILL HAVE TO WAIT..GLADE SOMEONE IS ON THOSE THEIVES TAILS FINLY..LOVE

 WHAT YOUR DOING..BERTHA-MARIE

I GO BY BERTHA-MARIE..PLEASE CHANGE MY NAME TO BERTHA-MARIE ON YOUR MAIL TO

 ME!!
From: raymodeen@comcast.net [mailto:raymodeen@comcast.net] 

Sent: Monday, August 31, 2015 9:32 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

I am not sure the people who drafted this Proposed Rule understand the insurance 

value of options.

As a small investor I have successfully used options for many years to manage risk in 

my retirement account. Options are primarily a risk management vehicle and are similar 

to insurance. For example, in my retirement account I can use options to reduce the 

volatility of my retirement assets by buying put options. There is NO way to do this 

simply using stocks and bonds. If you allow retirement investors to RISK their capital 

with stocks and bonds, then why take away the one vehicle enabling them to insure 

their retirement assets: OPTIONS? 

For most small investors, their house and their retirement accounts are their major 

assets. If the small investor can insure his or her house, why remove the one vehicle 

that enables the small investor to insure their retirement account?

I therefore recommend that you exclude options trading from the Proposed Rule.

Ray Modeen
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                       7,370,825
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,586,298
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,439,701
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,689,034
<PP&E>                                         296,186
<DEPRECIATION>                                 158,442
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,025,380
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          518,344
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    233,105
<COMMON>                                        28,403
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,025,380
<SALES>                                      3,192,396
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,340,842
<CGS>                                        1,103,001
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,245,312
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,095,530
<INCOME-TAX>                                   372,480
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   723,050
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26
        

</TABLE>
1210-AB32-2-1206.html[7/24/2015 8:19:23 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvs-wmu4

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1700

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Stephanie Clark

Address:

6568 balsam dr.

Reynoldsburg, OH, 43068

General Comment

I need LESS government! Not more!
Editorial Note on Part 365
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 365 appear at 66 FR 49870, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 365.501 Scope of rules. ( a ) The rules in this subpart govern the application by a Mexico-domiciled motor carrier to provide transportation of property or passengers in interstate commerce between Mexico and points in the United States beyond the municipalities and commercial zones along the United States-Mexico international border.
( b ) A Mexico-domiciled carrier may not provide point-to-point transportation services, including express delivery services, within the United States for goods other than international cargo.
# CJTF-OIR Strike Summary April 7- 20, 2019

/ Published April 24, 2019

April 24, 2019

Release # 20190424-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**SOUTHWEST ASIA –**Combined Joint Task Force – Operation Inherent Resolve and its partners continue to target and pursue the enduring defeat of Daesh.

CJTF-OIR and partner forces have liberated nearly 110,000 square kilometers (42,471 square miles) from Daesh; as a result, 7.7 million people no longer live under Daesh oppression.

CJTF-OIR remains committed to the enduring defeat of Daesh to improve conditions for peace and stability in the region, and to protect all our homelands from Daesh's terrorist threat.

Strike Summary

Between April 7 - 20, 2019, CJTF-OIR conducted 18 strikes consisting of 36 engagements against Daesh targets in Iraq, there were no strikes conducted in Syria.

In Iraq, CJTF-OIR conducted 18 strikes consisting of 36 engagements, engaged 10 Daesh tactical units, and destroyed eight buildings, three tunnels, and two caves. 

Between April 7 - 20, 2019, CJTF-OIR detected 42 strikes from other actors that crossed the Euphrates River Valley. CJTF-OIR is committed to avoiding and in every case minimizing civilian casualties; CJTF-OIR calls on all other actors in the area to observe the same precautions.

This Coalition strike release contains all strikes conducted by fighter, attack, bomber, rotary-wing, or remotely piloted aircraft, rocket propelled artillery and ground-based tactical artillery.

A strike, as defined in the Coalition release, refers to one or more kinetic engagements that occur in roughly the same geographic location to produce a single, sometimes cumulative effect in that location. For example, a single aircraft delivering a single weapon against a lone Daesh vehicle is one strike, but so is multiple aircraft delivering dozens of weapons against a group of Daesh-held buildings and weapon systems in a compound, having the cumulative effect of making that facility harder or impossible to use. Strike assessments are based on initial reports and may be refined.

CJTF-OIR does not report the number or type of aircraft employed in a strike, the number of munitions dropped in each strike, or the number of individual munition impact points against a target. The information used to compile the daily strike releases is based on 'Z' or Greenwich Mean Time.

#DefeatDaesh
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0544.html[7/20/2015 8:29:14 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-3wx6

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0544

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Bart Klettke

General Comment

Hands off my retirement money Federal Govt. Don't Tread on Me!!
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1132.html[7/22/2015 12:11:47 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-659d

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1132

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Dorothy Coleman

Address:

16640 Warren Ranch Rd

HOCKLEY, TX, 77447

Email: candybean100@hotmail.com

Phone: 8324288221

General Comment

It's my money, I was smart enough to save it, and I am smart enough to know how to spend it or save in my

 retirement.
**CERTIFICATE      PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respect, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                    |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /*s*/ *Yiqing                Wan*                                                                                  |   |   |   |
| Name:                  Yiqing                  Wan Title:                    Chief                    Executive Officer |   |   |        |
|                                                                                                                    |   |   |   |
| Date:                  May                  21, 2007                                                                    |   |   |        |

----