alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 10(a)(7)

                               AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

                            UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

         THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE (this "Amendment")
entered into as of this 30th day of January 2004, by and between International
Truck & Engine Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("International"), and Core
Molding Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company").

                                   WITNESSETH:

         WHEREAS, the Company previously executed and delivered to International
that certain Unsecured Promissory Note dated as of December 29, 2003, in the
original principal amount of Two Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars
($200,000.00) (the "Note");

         NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of
which is hereby acknowledged, International and the Company desire to amend the
Note and hereby agree as follows:

         1.       Each reference to "Noteholder" in Section 3. MISCELLANEOUS of
the Note shall be stricken and replaced with "International" and any reference
to "his" in such Section 3 shall be stricken and replaced with "it. "

         2.       A new Section 4. PERFORMANCE OF OBLIGATIONS shall be added to
the Note and shall read as follows:

         4.       PERFORMANCE OF OBLIGATIONS.

                  The outstanding principal and interest of this Note will be
         forgiven by International, provided the Company achieves earnings
         before interest and taxes of $3,981,000.00 for the period January 1,
         2004 to December 31, 2004.

         3.       The Company hereby ratifies and confirms the Note, as amended
hereby, in all respects, and, as amended hereby, the terms thereof shall remain
in full force and effect. This Amendment may be attached to and shall form a
part of the Note for all purposes. This Amendment may be executed in two or more
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which
together shall constitute one and the same instrument

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument is executed as of the day and year
first above written.

                                        Core Molding Technologies, Inc.

                                        By: /s/ Herman F. Dick Jr.
                                            ----------------------
                                            Herman F. Dick, Jr.
                                            Treasurer and CFO

                                        International Truck & Engine Corp.

                                        By: /s/ T.M. Endsley
                                            -----------------------
                                            Terry Endsley
                                            Vice President and Treasurer
###### Editorial Note on Part 389

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 389 appear at 66 FR 49873, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 389.37 Proceedings on petitions for reconsideration.

The Administrator may grant or deny, in whole or in part, any petition for reconsideration without further proceedings. In the event he/she determines to reconsider any rule, he/she may issue a final decision on reconsideration without further proceedings, or he/she may provide such opportunity to submit comment or information and data as he/she deems appropriate. Whenever the Administrator determines that a petition should be granted or denied, he/she prepares a notice of the grant or denial of a petition for reconsideration, for issuance to the petitioner, and issues it to the petitioner. The Administrator may consolidate petitions relating to the same rule.

[35 FR 9209, June 12, 1970, as amended at 53 FR 2036, Jan. 26, 1988]
<PAGE>
                                                     Exhibit 23.3
                                                     ------------
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
=================================================================

Nichols, Rise & Company





The Board of Directors
CMI Corporation


   We  consent  to incorporation by reference in the registration
statement on Form S-8 of CMI Corporation filed on July 12,  1993,
of  our report dated January 31, 1994, relating to the statements
of  earnings, division capital and cash flows of CMI Bid-Well,  a
division  of  CMI  Corporation, for the year ended  December  31,
1993,  which  report  appears in the December  31,  1995,  annual
report on Form 10-K of CMI Corporation.




218 South Ridge Plaza
South Sioux City, Nebraska
February 3, 1996
ACCEPTED 01-15-00694-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/27/2015 12:24:38 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

 

I, David D. Hillard, Chief Financial Officer of Fisher Communications, Inc., certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of FisherCommunications, Inc.; 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, thisquarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3.    Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report. 

 

Date: September 12, 2003
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID ELIAS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

JANET A. NAPOLITANO, in her official

capacity as Secretary of Department of

Homeland Security; DEPARTMENT OF

HOMELAND SECURITY,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 11-57056

D.C. No. 8:09-cv-01490-JSTMLG

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Josephine Staton Tucker, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 14, 2013** 

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

David Elias appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his

disability discrimination action alleging claims under, among other statutes, the

FILED

MAY 21 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-57056

Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Walton v. U.S.

Marshals Serv., 492 F.3d 998, 1005 (9th Cir. 2007), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Elias’s claim

under the Rehabilitation Act because Elias failed to raise a genuine dispute of

material fact as to whether his diabetes constituted a disability or resulted in him

being regarded as disabled, and whether he suffered employment discrimination on

the basis of a disability. See Johnson v. Bd. of Trs. of Boundary Cnty. Sch. Dist.

No. 101, 666 F.3d 561, 564 & n.1 (9th Cir. 2011) (expansion of how “disability” is

defined under the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 is effective January 1, 2009, and

does not apply retroactively); Walton, 492 F.3d at 1005-06 (discussing elements

of prima facie case of disability discrimination under the Rehabilitation Act, as

incorporated from standards of liability under the ADA, as well as the

requirements for a “regarded as” claim); see also Fraser v. Goodale, 342 F.3d

1032, 1038, 1041-43 (9th Cir. 2003) (explaining that whether a person is disabled

under comparable ADA provision is an individualized inquiry, and finding a

triable dispute as to whether plaintiff’s diabetes was a disability because her

treatment regimen substantially limited her in performing a major life activity).

Elias’s contentions regarding the alleged admission of “junk science” and
3 11-57056

his entitlement to reasonable accommodations are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.413 How are notices sent to service agents? ( a ) If you are a service agent, DOT sends notices to you, including correction notices, notices of proposed exclusion, decision notices, and other notices, in any of the ways mentioned in paragraph (b) or (c) of this section.
( b ) DOT may send a notice to you, your identified counsel, your agent for service of process, or any of your partners, officers, directors, owners, or joint venturers to the last known street address, fax number, or e-mail address. DOT deems the notice to have been received by you if sent to any of these persons.
( c ) DOT considers notices to be received by you— ( 1 ) When delivered, if DOT mails the notice to the last known street address, or five days after we send it if the letter is undeliverable;
( 2 ) When sent, if DOT sends the notice by fax or five days after we send it if the fax is undeliverable; or
( 3 ) When delivered, if DOT sends the notice by e-mail or five days after DOT sends it if the e-mail is undeliverable.
#### § 511.72 Authority for representation.

Any individual acting in a representative capacity in any adjudicative proceeding may be required by the Presiding Officer or the Administrator to show his or her authority to act in such capacity. A regular employee of a party who appears on behalf of the party shall be required by the Presiding Officer or the Administrator to show his or her authority to so appear.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe effects of structural flap-lag and pitch-lag coupling on soft inplane hingeless rotor stability in hoverA 1.62-m-diameter rotor model was tested in hover to examine the effects of structural flap-lag and pitch-lag coupling on isolated rotor blade lead-lag stability. Flap-lag coupling was introduced by inclining the principal axes of the blade structure up to 60 degrees. Pitch-lag coupling was obtained either alone or in combination with flap-lag coupling through the use of skewed flexural hinges. The principal results confirm the predictions of theory, and show that both structural flap-lag and pitch-lag coupling when used separately are beneficial to blade stability. Moreover, when the couplings are combined, the lead-lag damping is significantly greater than it would be if the individual contributions were superimposed. Pitch-flap coupling is shown to have only a minor effect on blade lead-lag damping. Differences between theory and experiment observed at zero blade pitch and flexure angles during the initial testing were determined in a second test to be caused by stand flexibility. Other differences between theory and experiment warrant further investigation.Document ID19900019187Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsBousman, William G.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1990Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-3002AVSCOM-TR-89-A-002NAS 1.60:3002A-89093AD-A226087Accession Number90N28503Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 992-21-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900019187.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 31.2



Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer







I, Frank Dalene, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Hamptons Luxury Homes, Inc.



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and



c)

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls.



6.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: September 12, 2005



/s/ Frank Dalene



Frank Dalene

Chief Financial Officer
# Iraqi Air Force and Coalition Counter Air Mission

/ Published April 17, 2019

April 16, 2019Release # 20190416-01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 

**SOUTHWEST ASIA –** Iraqi Air Force F-16 Fighting Falcon aircraft flew a defensive counter air mission above the Iraqi-Syrian border alongside Coalition aircraft April 16, 2019.

This marks the first time Iraqi Air Force fighter aircraft have flown a combat sortie alongside Coalition aircraft.

The sortie represents a milestone as the Global Coalition Against Daesh continues to work by, with and through the Iraqi Security Forces to build Iraqi airpower through Security Forces Advisement.

“The Iraqi Air Enterprise continues to build their capabilities as Coalition air advisors work alongside our Iraqi partners to integrate operations,” said Brig. Gen. Brook Leonard, the Director, Air Operations, Combined Joint Task Force - Operation Inherent Resolve. “The strength of our Coalition team comes from our unity and resolve as we continue to bring the fight to malign actors such as Daesh.”

Together, CJTF-OIR and the ISF will develop a sustainable and inclusive ISF which can secure its sovereign borders, protect the population and support a return to normalcy across the country while ensuring the lasting defeat of Daesh.

#DefeatDaesh
1210-AB32-2-1532.html[7/26/2015 7:10:22 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwp-1ibs

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2029

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Rose Hullinger

Address:

168 Cold Springs Rd

Douglas, WY, 82633

Email: rose74hullinger@gmail.com

Phone: 3073591231

General Comment

I earned my 401k by hard work. I do not need anyone telling me what to do with it!
1210-AB32-2-1275.html[7/24/2015 10:07:04 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvu-kwqs

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1770

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

My husband and myself are retired.

We are both in our 70s but had enough sense many years ago to realize that the government would never be there

 to keep us solvent in our retirement years. We set aside money each month for the time that we could retire and

 collect a small sum of social security and what we were able to put aside in IRAs and 401Ks besides savings,

 that now draw little or no interest.

I have encouraged young people, when I was working, to never rely on the government to take care of them. To

 start a savings plan, an IRA, or a 401K. Social security will never pay enough to have any type of life.

We are now able to travel and take a big trip at least once a year, sometimes twice a year. 

This was through no dependence on the government and a sure knowledge that the government was never

 designed to help anyone but itself.

I tell my children, grandchildren and someday my great grandchildren. Plan ahead, save, be mindful of what you

 will need and that you don't want to work for the rest of your life to pay for those who never considered that

 someday they would have to retire of perhaps die on the job.
Aug. 24: U.S. Military Conducts Airstrikes Against ISIL Near Irbil and Mosul Dam
 By U.S. Central Command News Release
  August 24, 2014 Release #20140828FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **TAMPA, Fla., Aug. 24, 2014 -** U.S. military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in support of Iraqi security force operations, using attack and remotely-piloted aircraft to conduct two airstrikes in the vicinity of Irbil and Mosul Dam. One strike destroyed an ISIL humvee near the Mosul Dam and the other strike destroyed an ISIL armed vehicle near Irbil.  All aircraft exited the strike area safely. These strikes were conducted under authority to support Iraqi security force and Kurdish defense force operations, as well as to protect critical infrastructure, U.S. personnel and facilities, and support humanitarian efforts. Since Aug. 8, U.S. Central Command has conducted a total of 96 airstrikes across Iraq. Of those, 62 have been in support of Iraqi forces near the Mosul Dam.
Definebenefits, Inc. 

5806 Prosperity Church Rd Suite A2-188 

Charlotte, NC 28269-2206 

February 2, 2011 

Office of Regulations and Interpretations Delivered via email: 

Employee Benefits Security Administration e-ORI@dol.gov 

Attn: Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule, 

Room N-5655 

U.S. Department of Labor 

200 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20210 

RE: Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

We are for the new Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule. 

Limitations

Paragraph (c) (2) (iii) of the proposed rule adds “advice, or appraisal or fairness opinion” shall not 

include the preparation of a general report or statement that merely reflects the value of an investment 

of a plan or participant or beneficiary, provided for purposes of compliance with reporting and 

disclosure requirements of the Act, the Internal Revenue Code, and the regulations, forms and 

schedules issued thereunder, unless such report involves assets for which there is not a generally 

recognized market and serves as a basis on which a plan may make distributions to plan participants 

and beneficiaries.” The proposed rule appears to clarify the position that independent third party 

administrators’ or plan consultants that provide plan service provider fee analyses and reports that 

merely reflects on the value of an investment of a plan and doing so to assist a plan administrator with 

compliance for the new Form 5500 Schedule C Report, will not meet paragraph (c)(1)(i) of the Rule. 

This appears to be a new and helpful service provided to a plan administrator by a firm that is not 

undertaking to provide impartial investment advice but assisting with the new fee disclosure 

requirements and per the Rule should put this in writing to the plan fiduciary. 

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to comment. 

Sincerely, 

Definebenefits, Inc 

Robert VandeVrede 

President
Exhibit 11

                             RANGER INDUSTRIES, INC.
                       (formerly Coleco Industries, Inc.)

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

              for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994

                                     -------

                                            1996          1995          1994
                                            ----          ----          ----

Primary:

   Net loss                             $  (140,697)  $  (173,189)  $  (200,487)

   Average common shares outstanding      4,000,000     4,000,000     4,000,000

   Primary loss per share               $      (.04)  $      (.04)  $      (.05)


Fully diluted:

   Net loss                             $  (140,697)  $  (173,189)  $  (200,487)

   Average common shares outstanding      4,000,000     4,000,000     4,000,000

   Fully-diluted loss per share         $      (.04)  $      (.04)  $      (.05)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 0- 0221 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. GARY WAYNE TEMPLE, JR. ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 20 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 13 2021

09/13/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0221