alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6648

FRANKLIN D. FRAZIER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Parker Evatt, Commissioner; C.J. CEPAK, Warden

at Broad River Correctional Institute; DR.

HOLMES, (Orthopedic) at Byrnes Clinic in

Columbia, South Carolina; LIEUTENANT MAZCK,

Broad River R & E Center; LIEUTENANT KNOWLIN,

Broad River Correctional Institute in official

and individual capacity; CLIFFORD GLOVER; DR.

ELLIOT; LINDA DUNLAP; SUSAN BRETZ; MRS.

WILLIAMS; DR. BOULWARE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-218-3-6BC)

Submitted: October 3, 1996 Decided: October 10, 1996

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Franklin D. Frazier, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Roy Settana, Jr.,

MCKAY, MCKAY, HENRY & FOSTER, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellees.
2
3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Frazier v. South

Carolina Dep't of Corrections, No. CA-95-218-3-6BC (D.S.C. Mar. 28,

1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
-----Original Message----- 

From: julieo00@hotmail.com [mailto:julieo00@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:25 AM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

j young 

55 Copperdale Ln 

Golden, CO 80403
Editorial Note on Part 450
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 450 appear at 74 FR 49241, Sept. 25, 2009, and at 77 FR 59790, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 450.7 Marking. ( a ) On each container that construction begins on or after January 1, 1984, all maximum gross weight markings on the container must be consistent with the maximum gross weight information on the safety approval plate.
( b ) On each container that construction begins before January 1, 1984, all maximum gross weight markings on the container must be consistent with the gross weight information on the safety approval plate no later than January 1, 1989.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under OMB control number 1625-0024) [49 FR 15562, Apr. 19, 1984, as amended at 71 FR 55747, Sept. 25, 2006]
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.341 Must service agents comply with DOT drug and alcohol testing requirements? ( a ) As a service agent, the services you provide to transportation employers must meet the requirements of this part and the DOT agency drug and alcohol testing regulations.
( b ) If you do not comply, DOT may take action under the Public Interest Exclusions procedures of this part (see Subpart R of this part) or applicable provisions of other DOT agency regulations.
----

| (1)   | the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | November 12, 2010 | /s/ W. Page Ogden  |   |
|--------|-------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |              | W. Page Ogden           |   |
|   |              | Chief Executive Officer |   |
1210-AB32-2-1350.html[7/26/2015 2:09:38 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvz-23t9

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1846

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

this is a comment
EXHIBIT 23




                           FIRSTENERGY CORP.

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS




          As independent public accountants, we hereby consent
to the incorporation of our reports included or incorporated by
reference in this Form 10-K, into FirstEnergy Corp.'s previously
filed Registration Statements, File No. 333-40065, No. 333-
48587, No. 333-48651, No. 333-58279, No. 333-65409, No. 333-
75985, No. 333-46444, No. 333-56094 and No. 333-81183.







ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP




Cleveland, Ohio,
  March 28, 2001.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANTHONY CURRINGTON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-1303

[July 11, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Michael C. Heisey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562022CF000587A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Robert Porter, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T. Acuña, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, FORST and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**Exhibit
        3**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Utah Medical Products, Inc. (the
        “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin
        L. Cornwell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
        18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)
              the
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              the
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 
 
 
 /s/
        Kevin L. Cornwell
 Kevin
        L.
        Cornwell
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 August
        7,
        2007
 
 
 *A
        signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
        document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
        that
        appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
        has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
        furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.*
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Fact Corporation(the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Jacqueline Danforth, President and Principal Accounting Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      November 14, 2008
                By:
                /s/ Jacqueline
      DanforthName:
      Jacqueline DanforthTitle:
      President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
      Officer)
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsRun-time parallelization and scheduling of loopsRun time methods are studied to automatically parallelize and schedule iterations of a do loop in certain cases, where compile-time information is inadequate. The methods presented involve execution time preprocessing of the loop. At compile-time, these methods set up the framework for performing a loop dependency analysis. At run time, wave fronts of concurrently executable loop iterations are identified. Using this wavefront information, loop iterations are reordered for increased parallelism. Symbolic transformation rules are used to produce: inspector procedures that perform execution time preprocessing and executors or transformed versions of source code loop structures. These transformed loop structures carry out the calculations planned in the inspector procedures. Performance results are presented from experiments conducted on the Encore Multimax. These results illustrate that run time reordering of loop indices can have a significant impact on performance. Furthermore, the overheads associated with this type of reordering are amortized when the loop is executed several times with the same dependency structure.Document ID19900017193Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypePreprint (Draft being sent to journal)AuthorsSaltz, Joel H.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Mirchandaney, Ravi*(Yale Univ. New Haven, CT., United States)*Crowley, Kay*(Yale Univ. New Haven, CT., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1990Subject CategoryMathematical And Computer Sciences (General)Report/Patent NumberAD-A223323NASA-CR-182039ICASE-88-70-REVNAS 1.26:182039ICASE-90-34Accession Number90N26509Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NSF ASC-88-19374CONTRACT_GRANT: N00014-86-K-0310CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-18605Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900017193.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
From: Brian Fox [mailto:brainyfox@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 10:18 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

As a recent retiree, I'm strongly in favor of financial regulations mandating a fiduciary obligation 

be placed upon any person functioning as a 'financial advisor' in any capacity.

Brian Fox, Lamoille, NV.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [CERCLA-04-2023-2526; FRL-10565-01-R4]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed settlement agreement.

# SUMMARY:

Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States Environmental Protection Agency is proposing to enter into an Administrative Settlement Agreement for Removal Action by Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser with Seven Seas Terminals, LLC concerning the Mississippi Phosphates Corp. Superfund Site. The settlement agreement addresses a removal action to be performed at the site by Seven Seas Terminals, LLC, a Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser.

# DATES:

The Agency will consider public comments on the proposed settlement agreement until September 20, 2023. The Agency will consider all comments received and may modify or withdraw its consent to the proposed settlement agreement, if comments received disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the proposed settlement agreement is inappropriate, improper or inadequate.

# ADDRESSES:

Copies of the settlement are available from the Agency by contacting Ms. Paula V. Painter, Program Analyst, using the contact information provided in this notice.

Comments may also be submitted by referencing the Site's name through one of the following methods:

*Internet: https://www.epa.gov/​aboutepa/​about-epa-region-4-southeast#r4-public-notices*

*Email: Painter.Paula@epa.gov*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Paula V. Painter at (404) 562-8887.

Gregory Armstrong,

Acting Manager, Enforcement Branch, Superfund & Emergency Management Division.

[FR Doc. 2023-17943 Filed 8-18-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
#### § 552.7 Public meeting.

If the Associate Administrator decides that a public meeting on the subject of the petition would contribute to the determination whether to commence a proceeding, he issues a notice of public meeting for publication in the Federal Register to advise interested persons of the time, place, and subject matter of the public meeting and invite their participation. Interested persons may submit their views and evidence through oral or written presentations, or both. There is no cross examination of witnesses. A transcript of the meeting is kept and exhibits may be accepted as part of the transcript. Sections 556 and 557 of title 5, U.S.C., do not apply to meetings held under this part. The Chief Counsel designates a member of his staff to serve as legal officer at the meeting.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Colleen B. Brown

Colleen B. Brown
President and Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-40292

Summary Calendar

 

FRANCISCO PASCUAL BARTOLO PEDRO,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

E.M. TROMINSKI, District Director, 

Immigration and Naturalization Service;

JANET RENO, United States Attorney General;

DORIS MEISSNER, Commissioner of Immigration

and Naturalization Service; U.S. ATTORNEY

Respondents-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-97-CV-282

- - - - - - - - - -

December 1, 2000

Before DAVIS, JONES and DEMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Francisco Pascual Bartolo Pedro (Bartolo), a native and

citizen of Guatemala who first entered the United States in 1985

and was apprehended upon reentry in 1997, appeals from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

petition for lack of jurisdiction based upon 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g). 

Bartolo’s § 2241 petition is both an attempt to prevent the INS

from effectuating its 1998 removal order and an appeal of the INS
No. 00-40292

-2-

** American Baptist Churches v. Thornburgh, 760 F.Supp. 796

(N.D. Cal. 1991)

proceeding determining that he was ineligible to benefits from

the ABC Settlement. R. 206-07, 252-53. Accordingly, the

requested relief falls within the ambit of § 1252(g), and the

district court correctly held that it was without jurisdiction to

consider it. See § 1252(g); Reno v. American-Arab AntiDiscrimination Committee, 119 S. Ct. 936, 943 (1999).

Because we AFFIRM the district court’s judgment that it

lacked jurisdiction over Bartolo’s § 2241 petition, we need not

address his contentions that: 1) he was not “apprehended at the

time of entry” because he had not actually entered the United

States when he was apprehended; 2) the deprivation of rights due

him under the ABC Settlement** violated due process; and 3) the

district court abused its discretion by overruling his objections

to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation “without

comment” and by denying “without comment” his Fed. R. Civ. P.

59(e) motion to amend judgment. 

AFFIRMED.
-----Original Message-----

Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2015 3:46 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Dear Labor Secretary Perez,

Thank you for taking comments regarding retirement savings.

My husband, is a highly knowledgeable self-taught investor in addition to his job with the 

National Park Service. He has been investing in low cost mutual funds through Vanguard since the mid 

90's and has done very well. 

Many years ago, his mother, took his investment advice and moved a portion of her 

retirement savings into some of the funds he recommended. She did very well with the funds also.

Since she lived in Washington State, and we lived in Florida and now Tennessee, he wasn't able to keep 

a close watch on her funds. When he did visit several years ago and got a look at her investments, he 

found that she had transferred all of her Vanguard funds to another place. He was upset, but did not 

question her.

Then, last year after her death, (at 77) her executor, brother , along with found in the will 

that all of the money was being managed by a financial advisor named who worked for Metlife 

Securities.

He had moved all of her funds into 20-25 high risk, high load funds, which she had no need for at her 

age. He was also moving the money from fund to fund every month and therefore collecting a 

substantial amount of fees with this activity. Of course, her balances were steadily dropping every 

month even while the market was holding steady or gaining.

When Mr. was located by , he was informed of her death (he claimed he hadn't heard she died, 

but we question this.) He was informed that all of the money would be transferred out of her accounts 

to Vanguard funds in each of the heirs' names. Even after this, he dragged his feet long enough to 

collect another month's worth of activity fees. had to contact another person at Metlife to get the 

money out. This person informed that the funds should have been frozen upon her death and no 

further activity should have taken place.

We never found out how was introduced to this disreputable advisor. As far as we know, he is still 

preying on elderly trusting people in the Tacoma, WA area.

Thank you for your help in getting the rule changed so that advisors must put their clients' best interest 

first.

Sincerely,
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PRINCETON NATIONAL BANCORP,
INC. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 6, 2011 (the Report), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                    
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.

| |                                    |                           
| | ---------------------------------- | --------------------------
| | /s/ Thomas
 D. Ogaard May 6, 2011 
| | Name:                              | Thomas D.
 Ogaard         
| | Title:                             | President
 and            
| |                                    | Chief
 Executive Officer  
| | Date:                              | May 6, 2011               
| |                                    |                           
| | /s/ Rodney
 D. Stickle May 6, 2011
| | Name:                              | Rodney D.
 Stickle, CPA   
| | Title:                             | Senior Vice
 President and
| |                                    | Chief
 Financial Officer  
| | Date:                              | May 6, 2011               

47

---
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0836.html[7/21/2015 3:40:13 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvb-kyez

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0836

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Hayley Anonymous

General Comment

No discrimination against the elderly! You have no right to limit how someone can spend his money. No new

 retirement regulation. I can plan for my own retirement and spend my money as I see fit. Older people can make

 decisions for themselves. Don't insult them with retirement regulation. Period.