alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn expert system for simulating electric loads aboard Space Station FreedomSpace Station Freedom will provide an infrastructure for space experimentation. This environment will feature regulated access to any resources required by an experiment. Automated systems are being developed to manage the electric power so that researchers can have the flexibility to modify their experiment plan for contingencies or for new opportunities. To define these flexible power management characteristics for Space Station Freedom, a simulation is required that captures the dynamic nature of space experimentation; namely, an investigator is allowed to restructure his experiment and to modify its execution. This changes the energy demands for the investigator's range of options. An expert system competent in the domain of cryogenic fluid management experimentation was developed. It will be used to help design and test automated power scheduling software for Freedom's electric power system. The expert system allows experiment planning and experiment simulation. The former evaluates experimental alternatives and offers advice on the details of the experiment's design. The latter provides a real-time simulation of the experiment replete with appropriate resource consumption.Document ID19900013009Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsKukich, George*(Analytical Engineering Corp. North Olmsted, OH., United States)*Dolce, James L.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryCyberneticsReport/Patent NumberE-5504NASA-TM-103150NAS 1.15:103150Meeting InformationMeeting: Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering ConferenceLocation: Reno, NVCountry: United StatesStart Date: August 12, 1990End Date: August 17, 1990Sponsors:AIAA,ACS,SAE,AIChE,IEEE,ASMEAccession Number90N22325Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 488-51-03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900013009.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Rocky Dee Hidrogo, Jr.

, * From the 220th District Court

of Comanche County,

Trial Court No. CR03104

.

Vs. No. 11

- 20

- 00 225

- CR * July 22 , 20 2 1

The State of Texas

, * Per Curiam Memorand um Opinion

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J.

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion, the

order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESExhibit 21 – Schedule of SubsidiariesAs of May 31, 2005, the Company had the following active subsidiaries:   *Wholly-owned subsidiaries of Comprehensive Care Corporation:* *State of Incorporation*Comprehensive Behavioral Care, Inc. Nevada   *Wholly-owned subsidiaries of Comprehensive Behavioral Care, Inc.:*  Comprehensive Care Integration, Inc. DelawareComprehensive Behavioral Care of Connecticut, Inc. FloridaHealthcare Management Services, Inc. MichiganHealthcare Management Services of Michigan, Inc. MichiganCompCare of Pennsylvania, Inc. Nevada   *Affiliates sponsored by Comprehensive Behavioral Care, Inc.:*  Comprehensive Provider Networks of Texas, Inc. Texas
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1095.html[7/22/2015 10:55:32 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-phal

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1095

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Kenneth Smalewich

General Comment

This is supposed to be a free society. We do NOT need the government controlling our retirement plans.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM NORWEST
FINANCIAL, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         169,017
<SECURITIES>                                 1,223,802
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,283,015
<ALLOWANCES>                                   357,213
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         349,639
<DEPRECIATION>                                 139,035
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,481,739
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                      8,294,894<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,855
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,583,682
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,481,739
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               485,595
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               200,552
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                68,082
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             124,863
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 92,098
<INCOME-TAX>                                    32,335
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    59,763
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>NORWEST FINANCIAL INC. HAS A NON-CLASSIFIED BALANCE
SHEET SO THIS INFORMATION IS UNAVAILABLE.
<F2>INCLUDES $3.0 BILLION OF SHORT-TERM LOANS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 573.3 Application. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (g), (h), and (i) of this section, this part applies to manufacturers of complete motor vehicles, incomplete motor vehicles, and motor vehicle original and replacement equipment, with respect to all vehicles and equipment that have been transported beyond the direct control of the manufacturer.
( b ) In the case of a defect or noncompliance decided to exist in a motor vehicle or equipment item imported into the United States, compliance with §§ 573.6 and 573.7 by either the fabricating manufacturer or the importer of the vehicle or equipment item shall be considered compliance by both.
( c ) In the case of a defect or noncompliance decided to exist in a vehicle manufactured in two or more stages, compliance with §§ 573.6 and 573.7 by either the manufacturer of the incomplete vehicle or any subsequent manufacturer of the vehicle shall be considered compliance by all manufacturers.
( d ) In the case of a defect or noncompliance decided to exist in an item of replacement equipment (except tires) compliance with §§ 573.6 and 573.7 by the brand name or trademark owner shall be considered compliance by the manufacturer. Tire brand name owners are considered manufacturers (49 U.S.C. 10102(b)(1)(E)) and have the same reporting requirements as manufacturers.
( e ) In the case of a defect or noncompliance decided to exist in an item of original equipment used in the vehicles of only one vehicle manufacturer, compliance with §§ 573.6 and 573.7 by either the vehicle or equipment manufacturer shall be considered compliance by both.
( f ) In the case of a defect or noncompliance decided to exist in original equipment installed in the vehicles of more than one manufacturer, compliance with § 573.6 is required of the equipment manufacturer as to the equipment item, and of each vehicle manufacturer as to the vehicles in which the equipment has been installed. Compliance with § 573.7 is required of the manufacturer who is conducting the recall campaign.
( g ) The provisions of § 573.10 apply to all persons.
( h ) The provisions of § 573.11 apply to dealers, including retailers of motor vehicle equipment.
( i ) The provisions of § 573.12 apply to all persons.
[43 FR 60169, Dec. 26, 1978, as amended at 60 FR 17268, Apr. 5, 1995; 66 FR 38162, July 23, 2001; 67 FR 19697, Apr. 23, 2002; 68 FR 18142, Apr. 15, 2003]
#### § 568.1 Purpose and scope.

The purpose of this part is to prescribe the method by which manufacturers of vehicles manufactured in two or more stages shall ensure conformity of those vehicles with the Federal motor vehicle safety standards (“standards”) and other regulations issued under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. § 30115) and the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 32504 and 33108(c)).
#### § 588.2 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to aid manufacturers in contacting the owners of child restraints during notification campaigns conducted in accordance with 49 CFR part 577, and to aid the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in determining whether a manufacturer has met its recall responsibilities.
1210-AB32-2-1348.html[7/26/2015 2:09:39 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvy-z6ol

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1844

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

To Department of Labor:

I am against any regulations that restrict how we can use our own money for retirement that has been invested in

 401K's and IRA's. Please leave them alone. We are capable of planning for our own retirement.
SCWC-16-0000531

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

CHRISTINE KIM, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-16-0000531; CASE NO. 1DTA-15-04670)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s application for writ 

of certiorari, filed on September 4, 2017, is hereby rejected. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, October 10, 2017.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-16-0000531

10-OCT-2017

03:07 PM
From: Sue Oglesby [mailto:soglesby@tx.rr.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 8:09 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Cc: 'Oglesby, Bill' 

Subject: public comments on lifetime income options for retirement plans

Dear US Department of Labor,

I strongly disagree with any attempt by the US Department of Labor to “manage” our private

retirement funds.  Much thought and deliberate sacrifice and value‐choices have gone into our

contributions in our retirement accounts.   Simply put, we have forgone many luxuries and

expenditures to provide for our future retirement.    We, as a couple, have the greatest incentive

to ensure that we will have adequate funds to cover our retirement years.  

To be quite frank, it seems to me that getting the government involved in our private retirement

funds would simply result in legalized theft.   As is painfully evident from the current economic

realities, our government is simply not capable of living within its means.  Surely, the exact issue

for which you are soliciting comments, has only come about because the government is looking

for yet another way to raise more money for itself.  I seriously doubt that the Department of

Labor is worried about my retirement well‐being.   

Let’s think a little about annuities versus private funds.  If there is money left over in my

retirement fund when I die, it can pass to my heirs.  If the government takes over and creates an

annuity, any leftover funds would revert to the government.  Since we save with the hope of

long life, chances are there will often be leftover funds.  I’m sure this likelihood has been studied

extensively by your department.   

Like many government brainstorms, this may seem like a bright idea right now to those seeking

to increase government revenue.  However, in the long term it creates poor behavior

incentives.  If workers know ahead of time that the government will control their retirement

funds, they will spend their money differently.  Obviously, less money will be invested in

retirement accounts.   

So, I conclude with the following:  The amount of money I’ve saved for retirement is none of

your business.  I am quite capable of managing my own finances.  So, simply and respectfully

stated – keep your hands off my money.   

Sincerely,  

Sue Oglesby
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0528.html[7/20/2015 8:13:10 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-sahk

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0528

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Daniel Cotts

Address:

1333 N. 24th St.

Unit 113

Phoenix, AL, 85008

Email: dtacotts@yahoo.com

Phone: 9283084398

General Comment

The Government needs to keep its HANDS OFF my retirement plans. Thomas Jefferson and the rest of our

 Founding Fathers would be sorely ashamed of what our Government has turned into - HANDS OFF!!!!!
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Documentation

of 0MB Review Under Executive

Order 12866 Title

of Action:NationalEmissionsStandardsforHazardousAirPollutants:FerroalloysProduction Docket#:EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0895

FRL#:9491-8

RIN:2060-AQ-11ThisactionwassubmittedtotheOfficeofManagementandBudget(0MB)forreviewunderExecutiveOrder(E.O.)12866,titledRegulatotyPlanningandReview(58FR51735,October4,1993).WheneverEPAmakespubliclyavailablearegulatoryactionthatwasreviewedunderE.O.12866,section6(a)(3)(E)oftheEQ.directstheAgencytoalso:(1)MakeavailabletothepublicacopyoftheinformationthatwasprovidedtoOMB’sOfficeofInformationandRegulatoryAffairs(OIRA)forreviewundertheE.O.,i.e.,thetextofthedraftregulatoryactionand,ifapplicable,anassessmentofthepotentialcostsandbenefits,aswellasadditionalinformationforthoseactionsthataredeterminedtobeeconomicallysignificantundertheEQ.(Informationrequirementsaredescribedinsections6(a)(3)(B)and(C)).(2)IdentifyforthepublicanysubstantivechangesbetweenthedraftsubmittedtoOIRAandtheactionthatwassubsequentlyissued,usingamethodthatiscomplete,clear,andsimple.(3)IdentifyforthepublicthosesubstantivechangesmadeatthesuggestionorrecommendationofOIRA. For this regulatory

action,
were substantive changes

made

to information reviewed
under

E.O.12866?[Pleasechecktheappropriateanswer.] Q No.[Inthedocket,includetheinformationidentifiedinitem(1)below.] Yes.[Inthedocket,includetheinformationidentifiedinitems(1)—(3)below.] Accordingly,

the Agency

has included

this form
and the following information

in the publicdocketforthisregulatoryaction:[Pleasechecktheappropriateinformation.] (1)

A copy

of the information

that was provided

to QIRA

for review under

the EQ. (2) Documentation

of any substantive changes

made

to the draft regulatory

text that was submitted

to QIRA when compared

with what was subsequently

made publicly available. The documentation

is provided

on the pages following

this form. Changes

made

at the suggestion

or recommendation

of OIRA,

if any,
are clearly identified through attribution

to QIRA.

EPA
has used
one

or more

of the following methods

to note changes:[Selecttheappropriateoption(s).] l (a) Redline-Strikeout— A copy

of the draft regulatory

action submitted,

using redline strikeout

to show

the substantive changes

that were made. Q (b) Hand Markup— A copy

of the draft regulatory

action submitted,

using handwritten

notes to show

the substantive changes

that were made. O (c) Note

to the file- A document

that identifies

the substantive changes

that were made, with page
and paragraph references

to the draft regulatory

action

that was submitted. If you have
any questions

about

this regulatory

action

or this documentation,

please

call the contact:Name:ConradChin

Email:chin.conrad@epa.gov

Phone:919-541-1512Revised05/05/2010
H. Res. 360

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 7, 2002.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill (H.R.

3090) to provide tax incentives for economic recovery, with

the Senate amendment thereto, and to consider in the House,

without intervention of any point of order, a motion offered

by the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means or his

designee that the House concur in the Senate amendment

with the amendment printed in the report of the Committee

on Rules accompanying this resolution. The Senate amendment and the motion shall be considered as read. The motion

shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled

by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means. The previous question shall be
2

•HRES 360 EH

considered as ordered on the motion to final adoption without

intervening motion.

Attest:

Clerk.
Consulting Agreement between Global Insights and the Company



 Exhibit 10.13 
 Memorandum 
 To: Paul and Joan Katzeff 
 From: Roy Doughty 
 Re: Renewal of agreement for shareholder relations. 
 Date: 11/26/04 
 Introduction 
 The shareholder agreement for the calendar year 2005 will basically simply ratify what Roy Doughty has been doing since February of 1998, and extend those duties through
the year 2005. The agreement will be with Roy Doughty only. 
 Tasks 
  

	 	•	 	Take calls from stockholders, fulfill their information requests regarding stock price, company activities, and any other appropriate matters 

  

	 	•	 	Notify Thanksgiving Coffee of changes 

  

	 	•	 	Notify transfer company of changes 

  

	 	•	 	Work with Ted Prescott regarding stockholder relations, buys and sells 

  

	 	•	 	Work with the SEC attorney (when necessary and cost-effective) regarding SEC requirements 

  

	 	•	 	Review any newsletters to stockholders 

  

	 	•	 	Coordinate with Sam on quarterly SEC stockholder fillings 

  

	 	•	 	Work with top management to create liquidity as soon as possible 

 Costs 
 Costs will be $1500.00 per month, plus postage, phone, other normally occurring administrative expenses, plus logistic costs if any.

 Term of this contract would be from January 1st, 2005 to December 31st, 2005. Invoicing will be done on the 1st of the month for the prior months work and
is due within 10 days of receipt. 
 Agreement completed on by the signatures below (sign and date), 
  

					
	Joan Katzeff,	 		 	Paul Katzeff
			
	/s/    Joan Katzeff	 		 	/s/    Paul Katzeff
			
	Roy Doughty,	 		 	11/26/04
			
	/s/    Roy Doughty
February 29, 2016 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue S.W. 

Wilbur Wright Bldg.- Suite 2Wl 000 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk AGC-430 

Re: FAA File No. 2012S0700374 

Request for Hearing 

Dear Clerk: 

!!Fros~ tit6wn 1oddLW 

ATTORNEYS 

Winston E Miller 

Member 

502.568.0296 (t) 

502.581.1087 (f) 

wmiller@fbtlaw.com 

VIA UPS Overnight and Regular U.S. Mail 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 13.16(g)(2)(ii) United Parcel Service, Inc. (an Ohio Corporation, 

"UPS Ground") and United Parcel Service Co. (a Delaware Corporation, "UPS Airlines") 

through its undersigned counsel hereby files a request for hearing regarding the Federal Aviation 

Administration's ("FAA's") Final Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty - FAA File No. 

2012S0700374 dated February 10, 2016 ("Final Notice") and received on February 16, 2016, in 

which the FAA proposed to assess a civil penalty in the amount of $3,250. This Request for 

Hearing is being made on behalf of UPS Ground and UPS Airlines because the Final Notice 

references and is based upon Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty FAA File No. 2012S0700374 

dated September 4, 2014 which was issued against both UPS Ground and UPS Airlines. 

Winston E. Miller 

Counsel for United Parcel Service, Inc. 

and United Parcel Service Co. 

400 West Market Street I 32nd Floor I Louisville, Kentucky 40202-3363 I 502.589.5400 I frostbrowntodd.com 

Offices in Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia 
Federal Aviation Administration 

Page 2 

February 29,2016 

cc: Ryan Landers 

Enforcement Division, Southern Team 

1701 Columbia Avenue 

College Park, GA 30337 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Request for Hearing has been sent via UPS overnight 

delivery, this 29'h day of February 2016. 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Bldg.- Suite 2W1000 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk (AGC-430) 

and a copy by certified mail- return receipt requested and regular U.S. mail to: 

Ryan Landers 

Enforcement Division, Southern Team 

1701 Columbia Avenue 

College Park, GA 30337 

OOOOOXA0624664 4830-ll76-2222vl 

Counsel for United Parcel Service, r'iic. 

and United Parcel Service Co. 

400 West Market Street I 32nd Floor I Louisville, Kentucky 40202-3363 I 502.589.5400 I frostbrowntodd.com 

Offices in Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia