alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Tuesday, November 7, 1995 (141), Para 141.18 Recess--3:45 P.M.]
[Page 1876]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.141.18  recess--3:45 p.m.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. SHAYS, pursuant to clause 12 of rule I, 
declared the House in recess at 3 o'clock and 45 minutes p.m., until 
6:00 p.m.
```
Rockingham,

June, 1900.

#### State *(ex rel.*Hubbard *&*a.) *v.*Piper *& a.*

An injunction cannot he ordered against the maintenance of a liquor nuisance in premises other than those described in the petition.

Petition, under section 5, chapter 205, of the Public Statutes, as amended by chapter 81, Laws 1899, signed by the selectmen of the town of Derry, for the ^abatement of a liquor nuisance in that town, and to enjoin the owner and occupants. Facts agreed.

The nuisance complained of was alleged to be carried on by the defendant Piper and one Gray, in a building situate on South Avenue, and owned by one Sartwell., The petition was filed August 24, 1899. Subsequent thereto, the occupants removed to another building on another street, where they have since maintained a nuisance of the kind complained of in the petition. The petitioners moved that Piper and Gray be temporarily enjoined from maintaining the nuisance complained of in the building at the new location.

*G. K. & B. T.*Bartlett, for the plaintiffs.

*Samuel W.*Emery, for the defendants.

Pike, J.

It is only when a building is used for the illegal purpose that it becomes a nuisance under the statute, and the court has jurisdiction only upon an information or petition in which the building complained of is sufficiently described. P. S., *c.*205, s. 4; Laws 1899, *c.*81, s. 1; *State*v. Saunders, 66 N. H. 39, 90; *State*v. Batcheller, 66 N. H. 145; *State*v. *Currier,*66 N. H. 622. The building to which Piper and Gray moved after this proceeding was begun was not complained of or described in the petition, and the question whether they should be enjoined for maintaining' a nuisance therein is therefore not before the court.

*Case discharged.*

Blodgett, C. J., did not sit: the others concurred.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 137

Congratulating the Kalmyk community of the United States on the 50th

anniversary of their emigration to the United States from displaced

persons camps in Germany after World War II.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 8, 2001

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. HOYER, Mr. PITTS, Mr. CARDIN,

Mr. WAMP, and Mr. HASTINGS of Florida) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

RESOLUTION

Congratulating the Kalmyk community of the United States

on the 50th anniversary of their emigration to the United

States from displaced persons camps in Germany after

World War II.

Whereas the Kalmyk people have inhabited the Russia

steppes—the vast arid lands in the southern region of

Russia—for hundreds of years;

Whereas the Kalmyk people were one of the seven ‘‘punished

peoples’’ exiled en masse to Siberia during World War II

by Soviet leader Josef Stalin;

Whereas, while the Kalmyk people were in internal exile in

the former Soviet Union, they lost their citizenship and
2

HRES 137 IH

mention of their existence was eradicated from Soviet

newspapers and books, including reference books;

Whereas, following World War II, a group of approximately

800 Kalmyk people were held in displaced persons camps

in the Western zone of Germany until 1951;

Whereas on July 28, 1951, the Attorney General of the

United States issued a ruling clearing the way for the

Kalmyk people in the displaced persons camps in Germany to enter the United States;

Whereas in the fifty years that the Kalmyk emigres and their

families have lived in the United States they have survived and prospered, contributing to American society;

Whereas the Kalmyk community, as the first community of

Tibetan Buddhists to settle in the United States, has

sought to preserve their unique culture, and many have

continued to practice their Tibetan Buddhist religion;

Whereas in the 1975 Helsinki Final Act, the participating

countries specifically consider the development of contacts

to be ‘‘an important element in the strengthening of

friendly relations and trust among people’’; and

Whereas since the dissolution of the former Soviet Union, the

Kalmyk community of the United States has actively reestablished contact with the Kalmyk people in Russia and

has developed a consistent exchange of students, professionals, and relatives, thereby contributing to mutual understanding between peoples and nations: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) congratulates the Kalmyk community of the

3 United States on the fiftieth anniversary of the set-
3

HRES 137 IH

1 tlement of the Kalmyk community in this country;

2 and

3 (2) encourages the continued exchange of men

4 and women of various ages and with breadth of

5 training and experience in the interest of the

6 Kalmyk people and the United States.

Æ
§ 511.14 Form and filing of documents. ( a ) *Filing.* Except as otherwise provided, all documents submitted to the Administrator or a Presiding Officer shall be filed with the Docket Section, Office of the Secretary, Department of Transportation, Room 4107, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590. Documents may be filed in person or by mail and shall be deemed filed on the day of filing or mailing.
( b ) *Caption.* Every document shall contain a caption setting forth the name of the action in connection with which it is filed, the docket number, and the title of the document.
( c ) *Copies.* An original and nine (9) copies of all documents shall be filed. Documents may be reproduced by printing or any other process, provided that all copies filed are clear and legible.
( d ) *Signature.* ( 1 ) The original of each document filed shall be signed by a representative of record for the party; or in the case of parties not represented, by the party; or by a partner, officer, or regular employee of any corporation, partnership, or association, who files an appearance on behalf of the party.
( 2 ) The act of signing a document constitutes a representation by the signer that the signer has read it; that to the best of the signer's knowledge, information and belief, the statements made in it are true; and that it is not filed for purposes of delay.
[45 FR 81578, Dec. 11, 1980, as amended at 53 FR 15782, May 3, 1988]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsComparison of several system identification methods for flexible structuresIn the last few years various methods of identifying structural dynamics models from modal testing data have appeared. A comparison is presented of four of these algorithms: the Eigensystem Realization Algorithm (ERA), the modified version ERA/DC where DC indicated that it makes use of data correlation, the Q-Markov Cover algorithm, and an algorithm due to Moonen, DeMoor, Vandenberghe, and Vandewalle. The comparison is made using a five mode computer module of the 20 meter Mini-Mast truss structure at NASA Langley Research Center, and various noise levels are superimposed to produced simulated data. The results show that for the example considered ERA/DC generally gives the best results; that ERA/DC is always at least as good as ERA which is shown to be a special case of ERA/DC; that Q-Markov requires the use of significantly more data than ERA/DC to produce comparable results; and that is some situations Q-Markov cannot produce comparable results.Document ID19910012261Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsLew, J.-S.*(Old Dominion Univ. Norfolk, VA., United States)*Juang, Jer-Nan*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Longman, Richard W.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1991Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:104046NASA-TM-104046Meeting InformationMeeting: Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials ConferenceLocation: Baltimore, MDCountry: United StatesStart Date: April 8, 1991End Date: April 10, 1991Accession Number91N21574Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 590-14-21-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910012261.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Editorial Note on Part 385
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 385 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 385.713 Reapplying for new entrant registration. ( a ) A non-North America-domiciled motor carrier whose provisional new entrant registration has been revoked may reapply for new entrant registration no sooner than 30 days after the date of revocation.
( b ) If the provisional new entrant registration was revoked because the new entrant failed to receive a Satisfactory rating after undergoing a compliance review, the new entrant must do all of the following: ( 1 ) Submit an updated Form MCSA-1, the URS online application;
( 2 ) Submit evidence that it has corrected the deficiencies that resulted in revocation of its registration and will otherwise ensure that it will have basic safety management controls in effect.
( 3 ) Successfully complete a pre-authorization safety audit in accordance with § 385.607(c) of this part.
( 4 ) Begin the 18-month new entrant monitoring cycle again as of the date the re-filed application is approved.
( c ) If the provisional new entrant registration was revoked because FMCSA found the new entrant failed to submit to a compliance review, the new entrant must do all of the following: ( 1 ) Submit an updated Form MCSA-1, the URS online application;
( 2 ) Successfully complete a pre-authorization safety audit in accordance with § 385.607(c) of this part.
( 3 ) Begin the 18-month new entrant monitoring cycle again as of the date the re-filed application is approved.
( 4 ) Submit to a compliance review upon request.
( d ) If the new entrant is a for-hire carrier subject to the registration provisions under 49 U.S.C. 13901 and also has had its operating authority revoked, it must reapply for operating authority as set forth in § 390.201(b) and part 365 of this subchapter.
[73 FR 76494, Dec. 16, 2008, as amended at 80 FR 63708, Oct. 21, 2015] Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 82 FR 5306, Jan. 17, 2017, § 385.713 was suspended, effective Jan. 14, 2017.
Employment agreement effective August 13, 2001



 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 This Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement (this “Second Amendment”), by and between Conrad Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Kenneth G. Myers, Jr. (“Executive”) is hereby entered
into effective as of March 1, 2004. 
  
 W I T N E S S E T H:

  
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive have entered
into that certain Employment Agreement, dated as of August 13, 2001, as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto effective as of September 15, 2003 (as amended, the “Employment Agreement”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to further amend the
Employment Agreement as set forth herein; 
  
 NOW,
THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the continued employment of Executive by the Company and the payment of salary and other compensation to Executive by the Company, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
  
 Section 1. Except as expressly amended hereby, all of the terms and
provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Capitalized terms used herein, unless otherwise defined herein, shall have the meaning given to them in the Employment Agreement. 
  
 Section 2. Except with respect to options granted under the Conrad
Industries, Inc. 1998 Stock Plan, “Change in Control” shall have the same meaning as “Change of Control” as defined in the Conrad Industries, Inc. 2002 Stock Plan. 
  
 Section 3. Executive acknowledges that subsequent to the execution of the Employment Agreement, Louisiana Revised
Statutes 23:921 was amended to overrule the decision of the Louisiana Supreme Court in SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond and related cases to provide that a person who becomes employed by a competing business may be deemed to be
“carrying on or engaged in” that business regardless of whether that person is an owner or equity interest holder of that business. It is the intent of Executive and the Company that if Executive becomes employed by a competing business,
he shall be considered to be carrying on or engaged in that business for purposes of this Agreement and that the noncompetition provisions of this Agreement be enforced to the fullest extent permitted under such statute as so amended. 
  
 Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 4 of the Employment
Agreement, the Company and Executive hereby mutually agree to extend the term of the Employment Agreement to December 31, 2005, such extended term to constitute an “Extended Term” as defined in the Employment Agreement, as amended hereby.








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Second Amendment to be duly executed and signed
as of the date indicated above. 
  

			
	CONRAD INDUSTRIES, INC. 
		
	By:	 	/s/    MICHAEL J. HARRIS        
	 	 	

	 	 	 Michael J. Harris
 Chairman, Compensation Committee of the
 Board of Directors of Conrad Industries, Inc.

	
	 EXECUTIVE

		
	 	 	/s/    KENNETH G. MYERS, JR.
	 	 	

	 	 	Kenneth G. Myers, Jr.
```

[112th Congress Public Law 267]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 2440]]

Public Law 112-267
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To amend title 5, United States Code, to make clear that accounts in the 
         Thrift Savings Fund are subject to certain Federal tax 
             levies. <<NOTE: Jan. 14, 2013 -  [H.R. 4365]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

    Section 8437(e)(3) of title 5, United States Code, is amended in the 
first sentence--
            (1) by striking ``659)'' and inserting ``659),''; and
            (2) by striking the period at the end and inserting the 
        following: ``, and shall be subject to a Federal tax levy under 
        section 6331 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.''.
SEC. 2. <<NOTE: 5 USC 8437 note.>> DISPOSITION OF AMOUNTS.

    Any potential revenue gain attributable to the enactment of this 
Act, as determined by the Director of the Congressional Budget Office--
            (1) shall be deposited in the general fund of the Treasury 
        of the United States; and
            (2) shall be used solely for purposes of deficit reduction.

    Approved January 14, 2013.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4365:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 112-630 (Comm. on Oversight and Government Reform).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 158 (2012):
                                    July 31, Aug. 1, considered and 
                                        passed House.
                                                        Vol. 158 (2013):
                                    Jan. 1, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 545.7 Reporting requirements for vehicles listed in § 541.3(b)(2). ( a ) *General reporting requirements.* Within 60 days after the end of the production year ending August 31, 2007, each manufacturer must submit a report to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration concerning small-volume lines that were manufactured between September 1, 2006 and August 31, 2007. Each report must— ( 1 ) Identify the manufacturer;
( 2 ) State the full name, title, and address of the official responsible for preparing the report;
( 3 ) Identify the production year being reported on;
( 4 ) Provide the information specified in paragraph (b) of this section;
( 5 ) Be written in the English language; and
( 6 ) Be submitted to: Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Room, 400 7th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590.
( b ) *Report content.* Within 60 days after the end of the production year ending August 31, 2007, each manufacturer shall provide: ( 1 ) The name of each small-volume line the manufacturer produces;
( 2 ) the number of motor vehicles in each small-volume line the manufacturer produced.
[70 FR 28851, May 19, 2005, as amended at 72 FR 46176, Aug. 17, 2007]
1210-AB32-2-1451.html[7/26/2015 5:23:24 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwe-25pz

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1947

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Dmitriy Suyurov

General Comment

Dear DOL. I don't need you to help me plan for my retirement. I'm fully capable to do it on my own.

Please do not interfere with my freedom.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.49

                                  AMENDMENT TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


       THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the
"First Amendment") is made and entered into as of August 15, 1997, by and
between COMNET Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("Company") and Robert S.
Bowen, a Maryland resident (Employee").

       WHEREAS, Company and Employee entered into that certain Amended Restated
Employment Agreement dated as of January 28, 1992 (the "Agreement"), regarding
various terms and conditions of employment of Employee with respect to Company;
and

       WHEREAS, Company and Employee wish to amend the Agreement, but only with
respect to the terms set out herein; and

       WHEREAS, Company and Employee are mutually desirous that such
satisfactory employment relationship should continue under the terms and
conditions of the Agreement, as amended.

       NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises contained herein, and
other good and valuable consideration (including the issuance to Employee of an
option to purchase 15,000 shares of common stock of COMNET), the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Company and Employee intending to
be legally bound hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

       1. Section 4 of the Agreement is hereby modified to include the following
new Subsection (d):

            d.    Notwithstanding the provisions set out in Section 4(a), above,
Bowen shall be entitled to a base salary of One Hundred and Seventy Thousand,
Fifty-Two Dollars ($170,052), constituting one-half (1/2) of the base salary
identified in Section 4(a), above, as adjusted pursuant to Section 4(b), above.
The reduced salary level shall remain in effect from the effective date of this
First Amendment until such time as Bowen has determined in his sole discretion
that the financial performance of the Company has materially improved and Bowen
has so notified the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the
Company.

       2. Group 1 and Bowen hereby affirm that the Agreement, as amended hereby,
remains in full force and effect, and is not further modified hereby.


<PAGE>   2

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this First
Amendment as of the date first written above.

                                    COMNET Corporation



                                    By:  [SIG]    
                                       ------------------------

                                    Its: Chief Financial Officer
                                         ----------------------

                                        /s/ROBERT S. BOWEN
                                    ----------------------------
                                    Robert S. Bowen, Individually
Exhibit 24.15



POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, Sue L. Gin do hereby appoint Frank M. Clark and J. Barry Mitchell, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my
behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2005 of Commonwealth Edison Company, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform
all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.



/s/ Sue L. GinSue L. Gin






DATE: February 13, 2006
NEW YORK, NY 

TYSONS CORNER , VA 

CHICAGO, IL 

STAMFORD,C T 

"ARSIPPANY, N J 

BRUSSELS, BELGIUM 

AFFILIATE: OFFICE S 

MUMBAI , INDIA 

KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP 

A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP 

305 0 K STREET, N.W. 

SUITE 40 0 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 2000 7 

(EOE) 342-S.40 0 

May 18, 2010 

FACSIMILE 

(20a ) 3A2-B4-5I 

www.kelleydrye.co m 

DIRECT LINE. (202) 342-8528 

EMAIL: dfisher@keMeydrye com 

r — I 

<Ci 

By Hand Delivery 

Ms. Dorothy Y. Beard 

Director, Office of Information Services 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

M-30,RoomW12-140 ,1 

Washington, D.C. 20590 • 

Re: Application of UPS Europe SA and UPS International, Inc. for 

Exemption and Amendment, Docket OST-2010-0128 

Dear Ms. Beard: 

On May 13, 2010, UPS Europe SA and UPS International, Inc. (the "Applicants") 

filed an Application for an exemption from the provisions of the Department's Order No. 98-2-5 

("Sudan Order") so as to permit the Applicants to operate one (1) one-way air freight forwarding 

movement to Sudan to transport medicine to treat malaria. 

The Applicants polled all persons served with the Application and hereby inform 

the Department that no party has any objection to the Application. Accordingly, the Applicants 

request that the Department grant the Application as soon as possible. 

Thank you very much for your assistance. 

Sincerely, 

•^/^ 

Janielle K. Fisher 

Attorney for United Parcel Service 

cc: All parties (via e-mail) 

Brett Kruger (via e-mail) 

DCOl/FISHD/412455.1