alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1210-AB32-2-1428.html[7/26/2015 4:56:43 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwb-ddog

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1924

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Cherie Suhy

General Comment

I am tired of the Federal government micromanaging my life. It seems they think their number one job is to

 control we the people. We worked hard and took personal responsibility for the day we could retire and have the

 right to control how we spend and what we spend our money on. Your job is to keep this country safe period.

 Not interfer in our private life.
§ 562.9 Compliance not affected by addition of certain materials and equipment. ( a ) *Successor standards.* Equipping new agricultural equipment that may be operated on a public road with lighting and marking materials and equipment that comply with a revision of ANSI/ASAE Standard 279 adopted after the version cited in § 562.7 does not affect compliance with the requirements of this part.
( b ) *Additional materials and equipment.* Equipping new agricultural equipment that may be operated on a public road with lighting and marking materials and equipment that are in addition to the minimum requirements specified in § 562.7 does not affect compliance with the requirements of this part.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications.  Archivedcopies of publications are retrieved in the event that publications are nolonger available from the original publishing agency site. (Historicalpurposes)
**Title:****Stop bullying now! : takea stand, lend a hand : resource kit en Espa�ol.**** 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.9002:B 87/KIT/SPAN.
Item Number:0507-H-17 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000584850
 
** - SBN_Tip_01_ES.pdfSBN_Tip_02_ES.pdfSBN_Tip_03_ES.pdfSBN_Tip_04_ES.pdfSBN_Tip_05_ES.pdfSBN_Tip_06_ES.pdfSBN_Tip_07_ES.pdfSBN_Tip_08_ES.pdfSBN_Tip_09_ES.pdfSBN_Tip_10_ES.pdfSBN_Tip_11_ES.pdfSBN_Tip_12_ES.pdfSBN_Tip_13_ES.pdfSBN_Tip_14_ES.pdfSBN_Tip_15_ES.pdfSBN_Tip_16_ES.pdfSBN_Tip_17_ES.pdfSBN_Tip_18_ES.pdfSBN_Tip_19_ES.pdfSBN_Tip_20_ES.pdfSBN_Tip_21_ES.pdfSBN_Tip_22_ES.pdf
 
February 21,2020
 
 ****
C H A M B E R O F CO M M E R C E

O F T H E

U N I T E D ST A T E S O F AM E R I C A

RA N D E L K. JO H N S O N

S E N I O R VI C E P R E S I D E N T

L A B O R , I M M I G R A T I O N , &

E M P L O Y E E B E N E F I T S

1 6 1 5 H S T R E E T , N . W .

W A S H I N G T O N , D . C . 2 0 0 6 2

2 0 2 / 4 6 3 - 5 4 4 8 · 2 0 2 / 4 6 3 - 5 9 0 1 F A X

December 22, 2010

Mr. Fred Wong

Office of Regulations and Interpretations

Employee Benefits Security Administration

U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20210

Dear Mr. Wong:

I am writing on behalf of the membership of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (Chamber) to

request a 60-day extension of the comment period for the proposed rule, Definition of the Term

“Fiduciary” issued by the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) on October 22, 2010. The Chamber is

the world's largest business federation, representing more than three million businesses and

organizations of every size, sector, and region.

As stated in the proposal, the regulations defining a fiduciary have not been updated since

they were originally issued in 1975. The preamble notes significant changes relating to retirement

plans since 1975. One such change is the overlap of issues between the DOL and the U.S. Securities

and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the area of retirement plans. This overlap of issues has been

further expanded by the Dodd-Frank Act which seeks many of the same goals as the DOL –

protection of investors and enhanced oversight. For this reason, we believe that an extension of the

comment period is necessary to analyze guidance from both agencies and make recommendations

based on a comprehensive view of the current marketplace and regulatory regime.

One day after the comment period ends for the DOL proposed rule, the SEC is required to

complete a study on the standard of care under the securities laws for broker-dealers and investment

advisers. The study is required pursuant to section 913 of the Dodd-Frank Act instructing the SEC

to study the standard of care applicable to broker-dealers and to study the effects of extending the

fiduciary standard of care applicable to investment advisers under the Investment Advisers Act of

1940 to broker-dealers. We anticipate that this study will significantly overlap with issues contained

in the DOL’s proposed rule. As such, we believe that is in the best interests of all parties to have

time to digest the study and provide comprehensive comments to the proposed rule that include the

findings in the study.

For these reasons, we believe that a 60-day extension of the comment period would be

beneficial to all parties. Thank you for the consideration of this request. If you have any questions,

please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,
#### Henry Rogers, *as Overseer, etc., Appellant, v.*Joseph E. Massoth, *Respondent*(and nineteen other cases in favor of same plaintiff against other defendants).

— Order in each case affirmed, with ten dollars costs in one action and disbursements in all. Opinion by

Hardin, J.;

Smith, P. J., not voting.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSpent-beam refocusing analysis and multistage depressed collector design for a 75-W, 59- to 64-GHz coupled-cavity traveling-wave tubeA computational design technique for coupled-cavity tubes (TWTs) equipped with spent-beam refocusers (SBRs) and multistage depressed collectors (MDCs) is described. A large-signal multidimensional computer program was used to analyze the TWT-SBR performance and to generate the spent-beam models used for MDC design. The results of a design involving a 75-W, 59 to 64 GHz TWT are presented. The SBR and MDC designs are shown, and the computed TWT, SBR, and MDC performances are described. Collector efficiencies in excess of 94 percent led to projected overall TWT efficiencies in the 40-percent range.Document ID19900018649Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsWilson, Jeffrey D.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Ramins, Peter*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Force, Dale A.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1990Subject CategoryElectronics And Electrical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:3039NASA-TP-3039E-5455Accession Number90N27965Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-44-2BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900018649.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
1210-AB32-2-1511.html[7/26/2015 6:40:36 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwm-r23g

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2007

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Paula Bragg

General Comment

Obama,

Leave 401K alone. I worked really hard for the money I have invested in my 401K plan.

I don't want you to tell me how to use it, retire with it or spend it.

Thank you.
From: Daryl [mailto:derdman@concertoventures.com] 

Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 1:29 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Definition of fiduciary proposed rule

My company was started by my grandfather in 1925. I am the third 

generation owner of it. It is a single supermarket in Kasson, Minnesota and 

we employ approximately 100 people. The average length of service for my 

full time employees is 18 years and we have many who have been with us 40 

years or longer. We have always felt close to our community and to our 

employees and so in 1985 we formed an ESOP. In a small community this has 

proven extremely beneficial retirement assistance to for our employees. 

The cost to administer this program has increased in one form or another in 

each of the years we have had it caused by regulatory edicts that require 

legal language changes to our plan. To many regulators this may seem trivial 

but for a small plan it has become onerous. Our annual administrative costs 

are currently running close to $5,000. This year, largely because of the 

recession, this cost will amount to about 10% of our profit. Two years ago 

we considered dropping the plan because of the continued cost escalation 

but chose not to in hopes that the government, in view of the times, might 

take a pause to adding costs to small business. Now the proposed fiduciary 

changes for the appraisal companies might just be the straw that will break 

our back in terms of affording administrative services for out plan and force 

us to drop it. I really feel that this would be tragic both for us and our 

employees. I would hope that common sense might prevail. 

Daryl Erdman

19846 North Sherry's Arm Road

Grand Rapids, MN 55744

home 218-326-6939; cell 612-710-6762
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

 

I, David D. Hillard, Chief Financial Officer of Fisher Communications, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Fisher Communications, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 14, 2003
#### § 38.85 Between-car barriers.

Where vehicles operate in a high-platform, level-boarding mode, devices or systems shall be provided to prevent, deter or warn individuals from inadvertently stepping off the platform between cars. Appropriate devices include, but are not limited to, pantograph gates, chains, motion detectors or other suitable devices.
<PAGE>
                                                       Exhibit 11
                                                       ----------

                CMI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                
                Computation of Earnings Per Share
              (in thousands, except per share data)
============================================================================
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Year ended December 31,
                                                   ------------------------- 
                                                      1995     1994     1993
                                                      ----     ----     ----
       Primary Earnings Per Share
       --------------------------
<S>                                                <C>       <C>      <C>
Net earnings per statement of operations           $17,501   22,618    8,032

Deduct dividends on preferred stock                    321      158      315

Deduct accretion of preferred stock discount            10       31       56
                                                    ------   ------   ------
Net earnings applicable to common stock            $17,170   22,429    7,661
                                                    ======   ======   ======
Weighted average common shares outstanding          20,367   20,352   20,343

Add dilutive effect of outstanding stock options
 (as determined using the treasury stock method)       526      614      403
                                                    ------   ------   ------
Weighted average common shares outstanding,
 as adjusted                                        20,893   20,966   20,746
                                                    ======   ======   ======
Primary earnings per share                         $   .82     1.07      .37
                                                    ======   ======   ======
       Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share
       --------------------------------
Net earnings applicable to common stock as shown
 in primary computation above                      $17,170   22,429    7,661
                                                    ======   ======   ======
Weighted average common shares outstanding          20,367   20,352   20,343

Add fully dilutive effect of outstanding stock
 options(as determined using the treasury stock
 method)                                               526      614      597
                                                    ------   ------   ------
Weighted average common shares outstanding,
 as adjusted                                        20,893   20,966   20,940
                                                    ======   ======   ======
Fully diluted earnings per share                   $   .82     1.07      .37
                                                    ======   ======   ======
</TABLE>
#### Elliot Cobb, Respondent, *v.*United Engineering and Contracting Company, Appellant.

*Cobb*v. *United Engineering & Contrg. Co.,*135 App. Div. 921, affirmed.

(Argued May 17, 1911;

decided June 6, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 29, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action by plaintiff to recover for the loss of his wife’s services occasioned by injuries alleged to have been received by her through the negligence of defendant.

*578
      *John Vernou Bouvier, Jr., Stephen P. Anderton, Dudley Davis*and *Frank V. Johnson*for appellant.

*Benjamin Slade, Maxwell Slade*and *David Slade*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
Exhibit 31.2



Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer







I, Frank Dalene, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Hamptons Luxury Homes, Inc.



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and



c)

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls.



6.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: August 3, 2005



/s/ Frank Dalene



Frank Dalene

Chief Financial Officer
sourceTypeID isLeapYearmonthID monthVMTFraction 11 Y 1 0.072904 11 Y 2 0.072023 11 Y 3 0.081529 11 Y 4 0.082098 11 Y 5 0.087286 11 Y 6 0.088052 11 Y 7 0.092096 11 Y 8 0.093198 11 Y 9 0.08447 11 Y 10 0.086301 11 Y 11 0.080029 11 Y 12 0.080015 21 Y 1 0.072904 21 Y 2 0.072023 21 Y 3 0.081529 21 Y 4 0.082098 21 Y 5 0.087286 21 Y 6 0.088052 21 Y 7 0.092096 21 Y 8 0.093198 21 Y 9 0.08447 21 Y 10 0.086301 21 Y 11 0.080029 21 Y 12 0.080015 31 Y 1 0.072904 31 Y 2 0.072023 31 Y 3 0.081529 31 Y 4 0.082098 31 Y 5 0.087286 31 Y 6 0.088052 31 Y 7 0.092096 31 Y 8 0.093198 31 Y 9 0.08447 31 Y 10 0.086301 31 Y 11 0.080029 31 Y 12 0.080015 32Y 1 0.072904 32Y 2 0.072023 32Y 3 0.081529 32Y 4 0.082098 32Y 5 0.087286 32Y 6 0.088052 32Y 7 0.092096 32Y 8 0.093198 32Y 9 0.08447 32Y 10 0.086301 32Y 11 0.080029 32Y 12 0.080015 41 Y 1 0.072904 41 Y 2 0.072023 41 Y 3 0.08152941 Y 4 0.082098

41 Y 5 0.087286 41 Y 6 0.088052 41 Y 7 0.092096 41 Y 8 0.093198 41 Y 9 0.08447 41 Y 10 0.086301 41 Y 11 0.080029 41 Y 12 0.080015 42Y 1 0.072904 42Y 2 0.072023 42Y 3 0.081529 42Y 4 0.082098 42Y 5 0.087286 42Y 6 0.088052 42Y 7 0.092096 42Y 8 0.093198 42Y 9 0.08447 42Y 10 0.086301 42Y 11 0.080029 42Y 12 0.080015 43Y 1 0.072904 43Y 2 0.072023 43Y 3 0.081529 43Y 4 0.082098 43Y 5 0.087286 43Y 6 0.088052 43Y 7 0.092096 43Y 8 0.093198 43Y 9 0.08447 43Y 10 0.086301 43Y 11 0.080029 43Y 12 0.080015 51 Y 1 0.072904 51 Y 2 0.072023 51 Y 3 0.081529 51 Y 4 0.082098 51 Y 5 0.087286 51 Y 6 0.088052 51 Y 7 0.092096 51 Y 8 0.093198 51 Y 9 0.08447 51 Y 10 0.086301 51 Y 11 0.080029 51 Y 12 0.080015 52Y 1 0.072904 52Y 2 0.072023 52Y 3 0.081529 52Y 4 0.082098 52Y 5 0.087286 52Y 6 0.088052 52Y 7 0.09209652Y 8 0.093198

52Y 9 0.08447 52Y 10 0.086301 52Y 11 0.080029 52Y 12 0.080015 53Y 1 0.072904 53Y 2 0.072023 53Y 3 0.081529 53Y 4 0.082098 53Y 5 0.087286 53Y 6 0.088052 53Y 7 0.092096 53Y 8 0.093198 53Y 9 0.08447 53Y 10 0.086301 53Y 11 0.080029 53Y 12 0.080015 54Y 1 0.072904 54Y 2 0.072023 54Y 3 0.081529 54Y 4 0.082098 54Y 5 0.087286 54Y 6 0.088052 54Y 7 0.092096 54Y 8 0.093198 54Y 9 0.08447 54Y 10 0.086301 54Y 11 0.080029 54Y 12 0.080015 61 Y 1 0.072904 61 Y 2 0.072023 61 Y 3 0.081529 61 Y 4 0.082098 61 Y 5 0.087286 61 Y 6 0.088052 61 Y 7 0.092096 61 Y 8 0.093198 61 Y 9 0.08447 61 Y 10 0.086301 61 Y 11 0.080029 61 Y 12 0.080015 62Y 1 0.072904 62Y 2 0.072023 62Y 3 0.081529 62Y 4 0.082098 62Y 5 0.087286 62Y 6 0.088052 62Y 7 0.092096 62Y 8 0.093198 62Y 9 0.08447 62Y 10 0.086301 62Y 11 0.08002962Y 12 0.080015