alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# table1a-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau		

# table1b-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau		

# table1c-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau		

# table2a-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau		

# table2b-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau		

# table3-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau		

# table4-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau		

# table5-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau		

# table6-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau		

# table7-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau		

# table8-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau		

# table9-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau		

# table10-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau		

# table11-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau		

# table12-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau		

# table13-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau		

# table14-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau		

# table15-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau		

# table16-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau		

# table17-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau		

# table18-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau		

# table19-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau		

# table20-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau		

# table21-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau		

# table22-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau		

# table23-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau		

# table24-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau		

# table25-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau		

# table26-2024Q1

U.S. Census Bureau
#### In the Matter of the Application of Charles O. Gunther for the Revocation of Letters of Administration Heretofore Granted to Josephine G. Manske on the Estate of Otto Gunther, Deceased. In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Josephine G. Manske, as Former Administratrix of the Estate of Otto Gunther, Deceased, Appellant; Charles O. Gunther et al., Respondents.

*Matter of Gunther,*140 App. Div. 861, affirmed.

(Argued May 31, 1911;

decided June 16, 1911.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 18, 1910, which affirmed a decree of the Kings County Surrogate’s Court sustaining objections to the account of the former administratrix of the estate of Otto Gunther, deceased.

*Emanuel J. Myers*and *Edivard C. Graves*for appellant.

*Joseph Ullman*for respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Chase and Collin, JJ.
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Century Properties FundXIX, LP (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer ofthe Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financialofficer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

      /s/Steven D. Cordes

Name: Steven D. Cordes

Date: August 11, 2010

 

 

      /s/Stephen B. Waters

Name: Stephen B. Waters

Date: August 11, 2010

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
1210-AB32-2-1521.html[7/26/2015 6:52:11 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwn-78it

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2018

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Jane Allen Calhoun

Address:

33722 Hwy 300

Bigelow, AR, 72016

Email: janeallen@bellsouth.net

General Comment

The government needs to keep away from my 401k!! I am smarter than any gov't bureaucrat in knowing how to

 spend my hard-earned dollars during my retirement. I am sick of gov't intrusion in my affairs!! I can choose

 what kind of healthcare insurance meets my needs, what kind of food I eat, what kind of light bulbs I use, and

 certainly how to use my retirement dollars!!!!
Panjwai farmers learn valuable skills
 By Sgt. Matt Young , 117th Mobile Public Affairs Detachment (Hawaii)
  Kandahar University instructor answers questions the farmers have during the Post Harvest Processing and Marketing class held at the Panjwai District Headquarters, July 7, 2012.(Photo by Sgt. Matt Young)
 PANJWAI, Afghanistan (July 12, 2012) — The  Panjwai District Headquarters in Kandahar province hosted 19 local farmers  during a four-day Post Harvest Processing  and Marketing Training Class with the graduation held here, July 7,  2012. The class was very  important to their grape, raisin, pomegranate and tomato production in the  Panjwai District, since Panjwai has become prominent in its production of  grapes. Kandahar University  instructor, Humadullah explained that the farmers were very enthusiastic and  asked many thought provoking questions throughout the course. “I really enjoyed the  class, I learned new ways to cut and hang the grapes and how to take care of our  tomatoes,” said one of the farmers, “It was very helpful.”The farmers learned the  advantages of postharvest processing for their crops. They learned how to  properly harvest, sort and grade their grapes, raisins, pomegranates and  tomatoes. The farmers also learned the proper ways to package their products for  shipment to market.“With the newly learned  knowledge these farmers now have, we hope to see them use it to help grow their  crops which in return will produce more product for the markets and will in  return provide more money for the farmers and their families and help out the  whole Panjwai District,” said Humadullah.At the end of the course  each farmer was presented with a certificate and a supply kit. The kit included  buckets, an orchard ladder, shears, lugs, gloves, helmets and safety goggles all  which will greatly help improve the farmers way of farming their crops and  ability to produce product.The farmers were all  smiles and eager to get out to their crops after receiving their certificates  and supply kits.“I would like to attend  more classes here if they are about farming,” explained one of the class  members. In the upcoming weeks  there will be a Pest Management course as well as a Composting class for any of  the local Panjwai farmers who want to attend. “We try to provide weekly  classes here at the district headquarters that will help the local farmers,”  said Capt. Varinka Ensminger a Kentucky Agribusiness Development Team member  with Task Force Strongbow. “We look forward to working more with the District  Development Assembly Chairman Haji Naik Mohammad and scheduling more classes in  the near future.”
###### Editorial Note on Part 451

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 451 appear at 74 FR 49241, Sept. 25, 2009, and at 77 FR 59790, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 451.3 Action by Approval Authority.

(a) The Approval Authority (or the Chief, Office of Operating and Environmental Standards (CG-OES), U.S. Coast Guard, if the application was submitted to the Coast Guard) issues to the owner a notice of approval or notifies the owner in writing that approval is denied, setting forth the deficiencies causing denial. Notification of approval entitles the owner to affix a safety approval plate to each container after an examination of each container concerned has been carried out in accordance with part 452 of this subchapter. In the case of an application submitted to the Coast Guard, the Chief, Office of Operating and Environmental Standards (CG-OES), U.S. Coast Guard acts on the application within 30 days of receipt of the application.

[45 FR 37214, June 2, 1980, as amended at 47 FR 50496, Nov. 8, 1982; 69 FR 58352, Sept. 30, 2004]
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 28, 2011

y0620 

# Order

June 28, 2011

142836

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142836 COA: 290856 Macomb CC: 2 008-002557-FH DAVID SCOTT HOSKINSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 16, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Z AHRA 

### , J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
1210-AB32-2-1612 html[7/26/2015 9:03:27 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jxx-rp66

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2109

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Kevin Campbell

General Comment

Dear EBSA,

I am and have been very capable of planning for my retirement and have spent the last 30 years putting a portion

 of money away in various investments for my use when I retire. I do not need the government to tell me what I

 can and cannot spend my money on or how much I can save for my use when I retire. This is just another

 bureaucratic snafu the United States government attempting to increase its size and take away more rights of the

 US citizens. The federal government must start living within budget, protect the United States borders, quit

 dreaming up these ridiculous schemes to take more money from the people of the United States, get out of

 health insurance and stop getting involved in things that should be controlled by the individual states and the

 people that live within the borders of those states. Stay out of my 401 I have in place for my retirement. I DO

 NOT NEED YOUR HELP TO CONTROL MY FUTURE OR THE YOU KEEP GIVING OUT.
#### § 511.46 Proposed findings, conclusions, and order.

Within a reasonable time after the closing of the record and receipt of the transcript, all parties and participants may, simultaneously, file post-hearing briefs, including proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law and a proposed order, together with reasons therefore. The Presiding Officer shall establish a date certain for the filing of the briefs, which shall not exceed 45 days after the close of the record except in unusual circumstances. The briefs shall be in writing, shall be served upon all parties, and shall contain adequate references to the record and authorities relied on. Replies shall be filed within fifteen (15) days of the date for the filing of briefs unless otherwise established by the Presiding Officer. The parties and participants may waive either or both submissions.
1210-AB32-2-1162.html[7/24/2015 7:10:25 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvr-qowg

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1656

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Christi Kendrick

Address:

5709 Sapphire Pool Trail

Fort Worth, TX, 76244

Email: clkendrick@prodigy.net

General Comment

Don't touch my IRA's! The money I have put into my personal IRA accounts were put there specifically for a

 purpose, and I earned every penny that is in them. I have paid my taxes on the funds in my Roth already, and

 will pay my due on my Traditional when that time comes. I will depend heavily on these funds when that time

 comes. Please DO NOT interfere in my personal investment business. My business is my business, whether it's

 right or wrong. My God-given free will should determine my future, not my government. Those of the working

 class that are attempting to secure a stable future depend on these investments in days to come, and we work

 very hard to earn the funds to invest. Please don't make life harder for us. I am not rich. Every penny counts. If

 you believe in this country, help us succeed, don't knock us to the ground. Thank you for your consideration,

 and God bless you all.

Sincerely,

Christi Kendrick
1210-AB32-2-1565.html[7/26/2015 7:41:13 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 11, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jxb-7ssx

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2062

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Please do not take from us the last best hope we have of preparing for retirement so that we may retire with

 dignity.

I've seen enough financial struggle in my life. Please, no more.
Editorial Note on Part 572
Editorial Notes: 1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 572.211 General description. ( a ) The Q3s Three-Year-Old Child Test Dummy is defined by the following materials: ( 1 ) The Parts/Drawings List (incorporated by reference, see § 572.210);
( 2 ) The Drawings and Specifications (incorporated by reference, see § 572.210);
( 3 ) The PADI (incorporated by reference, see § 572.210).
( b ) The structural properties of the dummy are such that the dummy conforms to this subpart in every respect before use in any test.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-11463

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DUSTIN LARMON MCDONALD,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:13-CR-94-1

Before JOLLY, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Dustin Larmon McDonald challenges the 18-month prison sentence 

imposed upon revocation of his supervised release. For the first time on appeal, 

he argues that the district court procedurally erred by failing to provide an 

adequate explanation for its sentencing decision. In particular, he asserts as 

follows: the district court failed to address his arguments in mitigation; its 

perfunctory statement regarding deterrence and protection of the public did 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 18, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-11463 Document: 00515040619 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/18/2019
No. 18-11463

2

not illuminate its reasons for imposing a sentence above the recommended 

range; the court did not explain how these factors related to his case; the error 

was plain; it affected his substantial rights; and this court should exercise its 

discretion to correct the error.

Because McDonald did not preserve his claim of procedural error for 

appeal by first raising it in the district court, plain error review applies. See 

United States v. Warren, 720 F.3d 321, 326 (5th Cir. 2013). Although 

McDonald argues that an objection was unnecessary to preserve his claim, he 

correctly concedes that this argument is foreclosed under circuit precedent,

and he raises it solely to preserve it for further review. See id. at 326-27; 

United States v. Whitelaw, 580 F.3d 256, 261-62 (5th Cir. 2009).

McDonald has not shown clear or obvious error. See Puckett v. United 

States, 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009). Before pronouncing its sentencing decision, 

the district court heard defense counsel’s arguments in mitigation, particularly 

facts concerning McDonald’s educational and employment accomplishments 

after his release from prison and his struggles with addiction. Additionally, 

the district court, the same court that presided over McDonald’s original 

sentencing, addressed the need for the sentence to provide adequate deterrence 

and protect the public, thereby explicitly identifying those 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3553(a)(2) factors that the court deemed relevant to its sentencing 

determination. Although the court’s explanation was brief, we are satisfied 

that the stated reasons show, in the context of McDonald’s case, that the court

considered the arguments presented and had a reasoned basis for imposing an 

above-range sentence. See Whitelaw, 580 F.3d at 261.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 18-11463 Document: 00515040619 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/18/2019
1210-AB32-2-1207.html[7/24/2015 8:19:23 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvs-n4y2

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1701

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Terry Reed

General Comment

I can plan my own retirement! So tired of the government taking over my basic rights.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 22, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 57130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18054]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to The National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--DVD Copy Control Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on June 15, 2023, pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the DVD Copy Control Association 
(``DVD CCA'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Hagiwara (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai, PEOPLE'S 
REPUBLIC OF CHINA; and Homenema Technology Inc., Taipei Hsien, TAIWAN, 
have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and DVD CCA intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On April 11, 2001, DVD CCA filed its original notification pursuant 
to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on 
August 3, 2001 (66 FR 40727).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 8, 
2023. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on March 27, 2023 (88 FR 18179).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-18054 Filed 8-21-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
exv10w1



 







Exhibit 10.1




2006 Performance Bonus Plan for Executive Officers




     All of the executive officers of Western Refining, Inc. (the “Company”) are eligible
for a discretionary annual performance bonus, as determined by the Section 162(m) Compensation
Subcommittee (the “Subcommittee”) of the Compensation Committee, subject to the Company
achieving a specified increase in adjusted EBITDA for fiscal year 2006 compared to adjusted EBITDA
for fiscal year 2005. Adjusted EBITDA represents earnings before interest expense, income tax
expense, amortization of loan fees, write-off of unamortized loan fees, depreciation, amortization
and maintenance turnaround expense.



     The amount of the bonus payment under the 2006 performance plan will be determined by the
Subcommittee after December 31, 2006. Bonus amounts can range from zero up to an amount not to
exceed 200% of each executive’s base salary. Payments of bonus amounts may be made in cash, stock
or a combination of both, in the discretion of the Subcommittee. The determination of the amount
of an individual’s bonus and the method of payment of the bonus will be made by the Subcommittee in
its discretion.
February 18, 2011
 
 
 Consent of Independent Petroleum Engineers and Geologists
 
 We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-163442) on Form S-3 of Tri-Valley Corporation (the “Company”) and in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, of the reference to AJM Petroleum Consultants, and the inclusion of our report dated February 16, 2011.
  By:  /s/ Robin Bertram
 Robin G. Bertram, P.Eng
 Executive Vice President
 
 
 Calgary, Alberta, Canada
 
 
 /sd
 
 
 
 
  East Tower, Fifth Avenue Place  6th Floor, 425 – 1st Street S.W. Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 3L8
 phone 403.648.3200     fax 403.265.0862     web www.ajmpetroleumconsultants.com
H. Res. 331

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 23, 2002.

Resolved, That a committee of two Members be appointed by the Speaker on the part of the House of Representatives to join with a committee on the part of the Senate to notify the President of the United States that a

quorum of each House has assembled and Congress is ready

to receive any communication that he may be pleased to

make.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 382.407 Medical review officer notifications to the employer.

Medical review officers shall report the results of controlled substances tests to employers in accordance with the requirements of part 40, Subpart G, of this title.