alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23




                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in COMSAT Corporation's
Registration Statement No. 2-87942 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-
5259 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-25124 on Form S-8, Registration
Statement No. 33-35364 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-53610 on Form
S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-51661 on Form S-3, Registration Statement No.
33-54369 on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 33-54685 on Form S-8,
Registration Statement No. 33-56331 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-
56333 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-59531 on Form S-8, Registration
Statement No. 33-59513 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-59841 on Form
S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-3061 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement
No. 333-78759 on Form S-8 of our report dated February 17, 2000 (March 17, 2000
as to the fourth paragraph of Note 2 and the second paragraph of Note 11),
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of COMSAT Corporation for the year
ended December 31, 1999.



Deloitte & Touche LLP
McLean, VA
March 28, 2000
###### Editorial Note on Part 393

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 393 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 393.89 Buses, driveshaft protection.

Any driveshaft extending lengthways under the floor of the passenger compartment of a bus shall be protected by means of at least one guard or bracket at that end of the shaft which is provided with a sliding connection (spline or other such device) to prevent the whipping of the shaft in the event of failure thereof or of any of its component parts. A shaft contained within a torque tube shall not require any such device.

[33 FR 19735, Dec. 25, 1968, as amended at 53 FR 49402, Dec. 7, 1988]
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc. at the
dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and no purchaser or seller of securities or any other person shall be entitled to rely upon the
foregoing certification for any purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ SAMUEL L. ERWIN      
|Samuel L. Erwin          
|Chief Executive Officer  
|Palmetto Bancshares, Inc.
|                         
|/s/ LEE S. DIXON         
|Lee S. Dixon             
|Chief Financial Officer  
|The Palmetto Bank        

Dated: November 1, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 218 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                            August 2 (legislative day, August 1), 2001.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, elected to the 
following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Standards of Official Conduct: Mr. Green of Texas.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0693.html[7/21/2015 9:48:46 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-zzdd

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0693

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Travis Foss

Address:

38634 Travis ln

Zephyrhills, FL, 33540

Email: Foss327@yahoo.com

General Comment

Leave my 401k alone I can put my money away on my own. I see how the government handles money, I'm sure I

 can have a retirement fund. I don't need my money lost or used for something else or fund someone who thinks

 they are entitled.
1210-AB32-2-1255.html[7/24/2015 9:42:43 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvt-qqmu

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1750

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Cherie Felos

Address:

611 Briarhill Rd.

Lebanon, TN, 37087

Email: mitchell.cherie@gmail.com

Phone: 615-547-6584

General Comment

We are smart enough to save for our own retirement. Thank you but please don't do this for us.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6584

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EMANUEL BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-90-240, CA-97-761-1)

Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 9, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Emanuel Brown, Appellant Pro Se. John Warren Stone, Jr., Assistant

United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Brown, Nos. CR-90-240; CA-97-761-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr.

2, 1998). Appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 374.107 Notice to be posted at terminal facilities.

No motor carrier of passengers subject to 49 U.S.C. subtitle IV, part B shall in the operation of vehicles in interstate or foreign commerce utilize any terminal facility in which there is not conspicuously displayed and maintained so as to be readily visible to the public a plainly legible sign or placard containing the full text of these regulations. Such sign or placard shall be captioned: “Public Notice: Regulations Applicable to Vehicles and Terminal Facilities of Interstate Motor Carriers of Passengers, by order of the Secretary, U.S. Department of Transportation.”

[36 FR 1338, Jan. 28, 1971. Redesignated at 61 FR 54709, Oct. 21, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 15423, Apr. 1, 1997; 81 FR 68345, Oct. 4, 2016]
§ 511.76 Qualifications and standards of conduct. ( a ) The NHTSA expects all persons appearing in proceedings before it to act with integrity, with respect, and in an ethical manner. Business transacted before and with the NHTSA shall be in good faith.
( b ) To maintain orderly proceedings, the Presiding Officer or the Administrator, as appropriate under this part, may exclude parties, participants, and their representatives for refusal to comply with directions, continued use of dilatory tactics, refusal to adhere to reasonable standards of orderly and ethical conduct, failure to act in good faith, or violation of the prohibition against certain ex parte communications. The Presiding Officer may, in addition to the above sanctions, deny access to additional *in camera* materials when a party or participant publicly releases such materials without authorization.
( c ) An excluded party, participant, or representative thereof may petition the Administrator to entertain an interlocutory appeal in accordance with § 511.24. If, after such appeal, the representative of a party or participant, is excluded, the hearing shall, at the request of the party or participant, be suspended for a reasonable time so that the party or participant may obtain another representative.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL J. PENDLETON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 35 WM 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2022, the Application for an Immediate 

Hearing and the Petition for King’s Bench or Extraordinary Jurisdiction are DENIED.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for
the periods presented in the Report.
   /s/ C. Neil LyonsC. Neil LyonsChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1191.html[7/22/2015 3:27:02 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvd-vcy7

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1191

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Jeff Mick

General Comment

DOL,

My retirement investments are mine to manage and not goverment's. As Obama would say,"The government

 didn't make that money. That's not their money!" let me manage my retirement.
§ 39.53 What information must PVOs provide to passengers with a disability? As a PVO, you must provide the following information to individuals who self-identify as having a disability (including those who are deaf or hard of hearing or who are blind or visually impaired) or who request disability-related information, or persons making inquiries on the behalf of such persons. The information you provide must, to the maximum extent feasible, be specific to the vessel a person is seeking to travel on or use. ( a ) The availability of accessible facilities on the vessel including, but not limited to, means of boarding the vessel, toilet rooms, staterooms, decks, dining, and recreational facilities.
( b ) Any limitations of the usability of the vessel or portions of the vessel by people with mobility impairments;
( c ) Any limitations on the accessibility of boarding and disembarking at ports at which the vessel will call (*e.g.,* because of the use of inaccessible lighters or tenders as the means of coming to or from the vessel);
( d ) Any limitations on the accessibility of services or tours ancillary to the transportation provided by the vessel concerning which the PVO makes arrangements available to passengers;
( e ) Any limitations on the ability of a passenger to take a service animal off the vessel at foreign ports at which the vessel will call (*e.g.,* because of quarantine regulations) and provisions for the care of an animal acceptable to the PVO that the passenger must meet when the passenger disembarks at a port at which the animal must remain aboard the vessel.
( f ) The services, including auxiliary aids and services, available to individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing or blind or visually impaired.
( g ) Any limitations on the ability of the vessel to accommodate passengers with a disability.
( h ) Any limitations on the accessibility of boarding and disembarking at ports at which the vessel will call and services or tours ancillary to the transportation provided by the vessel concerning which the PVO makes arrangements available to passengers.
#### Omaha Loan & Building Association, appellee, v. William D. Cooke, appellee: First National Bank of Hastings, appellant.

Filed June 26, 1918.

No. 19417.

Notes: Ownership: General Denial: Proof. If a general allegation of ownership of a promissory note is supported only by evidence *618that it is held as collateral security, the party sought to be charged may, under a general denial of such ownership, prove that there is. nothing due upon the principal note, and so defeat a recovery.

Opinion on motion for rehearing of case reported in 101 Neb. 750.

*Former opinion adhered to.*

Sedgwick, J.

In onr former opinion in this case, 101 Neb. 750, we said: “As the bank alleged no interest in the note upon which the mortgage had been foreclosed except as collateral security for the $1,550 note, if it should be found that there was no liability on this latter note, the bank could not recover in this action, and we will first consider that question.” The appellant, First National Bank of Hastings, in its motion and brief for rehearing asserted: “That no issue is made by the pleadings in this cause by the appellee on the validity of the principal note, and to which the note and mortgage herein sued upon are collateral. ” Upon this statement argument was had before the court, and upon examination of the record we find that the bank in its answer and cross-petition álleged the execution of the $2,500 note secured by the mortgage that was being foreclosed, and upon which decree had been entered in favor of the Omaha Loan & Building Association, plaintiff, upon one of the $2,500 notes secured by the mortgage, and then in its answer the bank alleged that “for a good-and valuable consideration said note and mortgage securing the same were duly assigned, transferred and set over to this answering defendant on or about the 1st day of June, 1911, and that this answering defendant-is now and ever since has been the owner of said note and mortgage, and that no part of the amount called for by said note and mortgage has been collected or paid, and the. said note and mortgage have long since been due and payable.” Nothing further is alleged in this answer of the bank as to its title and interest in this note, and it appears that upon-the trial the bank- claimed that its title and interest in the note was as collateral *619security to the $1,550 note mentioned- in our former opinion. The answer of the defendant Cocke to this cross-petition of the bank denied the allegation that the bank was the-'owner of the note, and when the bank proved its ownership only by showing that it held it as collateral to the $1,550 note, it was clearly proper for the defendant Cocke to show that there was nothing due upon the $1,550 note for which the bank claimed to hold the note in litigation as collateral.

The judgment of the district court is fully sustained for the reasons stated in our former opinion, which is therefore adhered to.

Former opinion adhered to.
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/ES-05-10912.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/ES-05-10912.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Century Properties Fund XIX;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 13, 2007

/s/Stephen B. Waters

Stephen B. Waters

Vice President of Fox Capital Management Corporation, equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership
#### The Town of Wheatland and others, *Plaintiffs, v.*Henry A. Taylor and others, *Defendants.*

— New trial denied and judgment ordered for defendant on the verdict. Opinion by

Hardin, J.
Editorial Note on Part 387
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 387 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 387.319 Fiduciaries. ( a ) *Definitions.* The terms “insured” and “principal” as used in a certificate of insurance, surety bond, and notice of cancellation, filed by or for a motor carrier, include the motor carrier and its fiduciary as of the moment of succession. The term “fiduciary” means any person authorized by law to collect and preserve property of incapacitated, financially disabled, bankrupt, or deceased holders of operating rights, and assignees of such holders.
( b ) *Insurance coverage in behalf of fiduciaries to apply concurrently.* The coverage furnished under the provisions of this section on behalf of fiduciaries shall not apply subsequent to the effective date of other insurance, or other security, filed with and approved by the FMCSA in behalf of such fiduciaries. After the coverage provided in this section shall have been in effect thirty (30) days, it may be cancelled or withdrawn within the succeeding period of thirty (30) days by the insurer, the insured, the surety, or the principal upon ten (10) days' notice in writing to the FMCSA at its office in Washington, DC, which period of ten (10) days shall commence to run from the date such notice is actually received by the FMCSA. After such coverage has been in effect for a total of sixty (60) days, it may be cancelled or withdrawn only in accordance with § 1043.7.
[32 FR 20032, Dec. 20, 1967, as amended at 47 FR 49596, Nov. 1, 1982; 47 FR 55945, Dec. 14, 1982; 55 FR 11197, Mar. 27, 1990]
Editorial Note on Part 384
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 384 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 384.203 Driving while under the influence. ( a ) The State must have in effect and enforce through licensing sanctions the disqualifications prescribed in § 383.51(b) of this subchapter for driving a CMV with a 0.04 alcohol concentration.
( b ) Nothing in this section shall be construed to require a State to apply its criminal or other sanctions for driving under the influence to a person found to have operated a CMV with an alcohol concentration of 0.04, except licensing sanctions including suspension, revocation, or cancellation.
( c ) A State that enacts and enforces through licensing sanctions the disqualifications prescribed in § 383.51(b) of this subchapter for driving a CMV with a 0.04 alcohol concentration and gives full faith and credit to the disqualification of CMV drivers by other States shall be deemed in substantial compliance with section 12009(a)(3) of the Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1986 (49 U.S.C. 31311(a)(3)).
[67 FR 49761, July 31, 2002]