alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

May 16, 2008

Mr. Roger W. Hughes

Adams & Graham, L.L.P.

P. O. Drawer 1429

Harlingen, TX 78551-1429

Honorable Mario E. Ramirez

332nd District Court

Hildago County Courthouse

100 N. Closner, 2nd Floor

Edinburg, TX 78539

Ms. Brandy M. Wingate

Attorney at Law

2504 Ponderosa Drive

Mission, TX 78572

Mr. Ramon Garcia

Law Offices of Ramon Garcia, P.C.

222 West University Drive

Edinburg, TX 78539

RE:Case Number:  05-0892

Court of Appeals Number:  13-05-00441-CV

Trial Court Number:  C-783-00-F

Style:IN RE  MCALLEN MEDICAL CENTER, INC., D/B/A MCALLEN MEDICAL CENTER AND UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC.

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed opinions in the above-referenced cause.  Real Parties in Interest’s Motion to Abate is dismissed as moot.  Real Parties in Interest’s Motion to Seal Document is granted.  Relators’ Unopposed Motion for Partial Dismissal and Relators’ Motion to Seal Motion Exhibits and Restrict View to In Camera Inspection are both granted.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosure

**Case No. 05-0892Page 2**
From: Miller, William [mailto:wmiller@McCarter.com]

Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 9:18 AM
To: Cohen, Daniel Cc: Cymbalsky, John; rmurphy@aga.org; Schryver, David; Exparte Communications Subject: RE: AGA/APGA Questions re Furnace NOPR, EERE

- 2014

- BT

- STD

- 0031

Dan: AGA/APGA have some questions regarding the use of AHRI Shipment Data in the LCC spreadsheet, to which we would appreciate prompt responses. Please explain the detailed methodolo gy used in the TSD and LCC spreadsheet to determine the fractions of each efficiency level in the baseline (no rule) scenario. This includes the approach to: • Incorporating the 1994 through 2009 state

- level AHRI condensing and non

- condensing fu rnace shipment data available only to LBNL as confidential information, • Bridging the current gap in state

- level shipment data starting in 2010, • Determining the fractions of each condensing furnace efficiency level (90, 92, 95, and 98% A FUE),

• Dis

- aggregating state

- level shipment data into new vs. replacement and residential vs. commercial, • Adjusting projected 2021 state level shipment data that was based on historical data trends (e.g., 5% non

- condensing furnace limit if projected condensing furnace shipments exceeds 95% of the state shipments)

DOE’s prompt attention to this matter is appreciated; if you have any questions, please contact me. Kindly see that this communication is posted in the subject proceeding. Than ks

- Bud

William T. Miller | Partner
McCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP1015 15th Street, NW, 12th Floor | Washington DC, 20005

T: 202

- 753

- 3420

F: 202

- 354

- 4658 wmiller@mccarter.com | www.mccarter.com

BOSTON | HARTFORD | STAMFORD | NEW YORK | NEWARK

EAST B RUNSWICK | PHILADELPHIA | WILMINGTON | WASHINGTON, DC

This email message from the law firm of McCarter & English, LLP is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Editorial Note on Part 576
Editorial Note: For an interpretation document regarding part 576, see 40 FR 3296, Jan. 21, 1975.

§ 576.5 Basic requirements. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 66633 , Aug. 16, 2024.
( a ) Each manufacturer of motor vehicles, child restraint systems, and tires shall retain, as specified in § 576.7 of this part, all records described in § 576.6 of this part for a period of five calendar years from the date on which they were generated or acquired by the manufacturer.
( b ) Each manufacturer of motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment shall retain, as specified in § 576.7 of this part, all the underlying records on which the information reported under part 579 of this chapter is based, for a period of five calendar years from the date on which they were generated or acquired by the manufacturer, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) Manufacturers need not retain copies of documents transmitted to NHTSA pursuant to parts 573, 577, and 579 of this chapter.
[67 FR 45873, July 10, 2002]
----

**EXHIBIT      32.3**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906**

**OF      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August                  8, 2006 | By:    | /s/Jeffry                  E. Sterba     |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|                                       |   | Jeffry                  E. Sterba        |
|                                       |   | Chairman,                  President and |
|                                       |   | Chief                  Executive Officer |
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States governmentSkip to main content
end of header


Census.gov
                                    >                                
                                Business & Economy    >Quarterly Services    >Press Release
 Skip to looking for section Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us Back to Our Surveys & Programs
 Main	About	Information for Respondents	Data	Time Series/Trend Charts	Technical Documentation	Release Schedule	Definitions	FAQs	Contact Us
                                Back to Our Surveys & Programs
  FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  Wednesday, March 13, 2024
 Quarterly Services Survey
 March 13, 2024
 Selected Services TotalU.S. selected services total revenue for the fourth quarter of 2023, adjusted for seasonal variation but not for price changes, was $5,398.9 billion, an increase of 1.9 percent (± 0.6 percent) from the third quarter of 2023 and up 6.6 percent (± 0.6 percent) from the fourth quarter of 2022. The third quarter of 2023 to fourth quarter of 2023 percentage change was revised from the advance estimate of 2.0 percent (± 0.6 percent).*The 90 percent confidence interval includes zero. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the actual change is different from zero.
                                    
                                        Additional Release Materials	         Quarterly Services Report: 4th Quarter 2023                                                         [763 KB]            Quarterly Services Report: 4th Quarter 2023                                                         [101 KB]            4th Quarter: Quarterly Services Report - All Tables                                                         [298 KB]            Seasonal Adjustment Factors                                                         [34 KB]            U.S. Selected Services Total Revenue - Year-to-Year Percentage Change                                                         [57 KB]
 Contact
 Data Inquiries      Media Inquiries
 Related Information
 Service Annual Survey
 Business and Industry
 Economic Census
 Economic Indicators
 E-Stats
 North American Industry Classification System
 Nonemployer Statistics
 County Business Patterns


CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on June 15, 2023, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Southwest Research Institute—Cooperative Research Group on ROS-Industrial Consortium-Americas (“RIC-Americas”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Instituto Tecnologico Y De Estudios Superiores De Monterrey, Monterrey, MEXICO, has been added as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and RIC-Americas intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On April 30, 2014, RIC-Americas filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 9, 2014 (79 FR 32999).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 31, 2023. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 12, 2023 (88 FR 38097).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2023-18086 Filed 8-22-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
§ 32.225 What actions must I take concerning employees who are convicted of drug violations in the workplace? There are two actions you must take if an employee is convicted of a drug violation in the workplace: ( a ) First, you must notify Federal agencies if an employee who is engaged in the performance of an award informs you about a conviction, as required by § 32.205(c)(2), or you otherwise learn of the conviction. Your notification to the Federal agencies must— ( 1 ) Be in writing;
( 2 ) Include the employee's position title;
( 3 ) Include the identification number(s) of each affected award;
( 4 ) Be sent within ten calendar days after you learn of the conviction; and
( 5 ) Be sent to every Federal agency on whose award the convicted employee was working. It must be sent to every awarding official or his or her official designee, unless the Federal agency has specified a central point for the receipt of the notices.
( b ) Second, within 30 calendar days of learning about an employee's conviction, you must either— ( 1 ) Take appropriate personnel action against the employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794), as amended; or
( 2 ) Require the employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for these purposes by a Federal, State or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency.
From: jt.thomas@ubs.com [mailto:jt.thomas@ubs.com] 

Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 11:01 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210AB32

After spending over 32 years giving investment advice, I believe that your new rule is NOT GOOD. The 

individual investor needs advice and should not be trying to get advice from the government. Yes, there 

are some bad examples in our industry, but for the most part, individuals need someone to go to for 

individualize advice based on their situation. Government regulations just increase cost for everyone. 

Just look at your own budget!!! Please stop the nonsense or go back to the drawing board and come up 

with a better plan. Thank you.

View my website by clicking here

John (JT) Thomas

First Vice President – Investments

UBS Financial Services

800 S. Gay St Ste 2600

Knoxville, TN 37929

865-329-1230

800-827-2723

Fax: 1-855-368-5234
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 9, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

## IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ 

### No. 06-60899 (Summary Calendar)

_____________________ IDA WELCH; IVORY WELCH Plaintiffs-Appellants THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORPORATION Defendant-Appellee

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court the Southern District of Mississippi

(3:05-CV-332)

--------------------- BEFORE SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### AFFIRMED. See Rule 47.6.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Greening EPA [electronicresource]**
 
SuDoc Number:EP 1.131:
Item Number:0431-J-38 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000585050
 
2000: FebAug
 
February 21, 2020
p.1 

II 

OAR Box 1168 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

85) ll-C-14 

Docket Number: 

A-89-10 

Printed 4/29/2008 11:23:19 AM Sheet 85 of 131 
P

* ^ n 

,si° *r<. 

OT __ *_>. \ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIC 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 A-89-10 

II-C-14 

P :'GQo 

aj I a. JO OFFICE OF 

POLICY, PLANNING AND EVALUATION 

Mr. Roy Johnson 

E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. 

Agricultural Products Department 

P.O. BOX 347 

LaPorte, TX 77572 

Dear Mr. Johnson: 

On behalf of the Regulatory Negotiation Committee for 

Fugitive Emissions from Equipment Leaks, I would like to thank 

you for the time and energy you and your collegues at DuPont 

LaPorte spent in preparing for and conducting our recent plant 

visit. We appreciated the willingness of your management and 

staff to spend time talking with us and showing us their 

equipment and facilities. The Committee members appreciated the 

time the DuPont staff spent preparing for and conducting the 

bagging demonstration for our benefit. All of the members of the 

committee thought that the visit was very worthwhile. 

The visit was referenced many times during the next two days 

as the committee met to discuss how the new program should be 

structured. I am sure that it will be referenced again at 

future meetings. If you have further information that you think 

would be of use to the committee, please feel free to contact Tom 

Kittleman from DuPont or Bob Ajax from EPA. 

Again, thank you for your hospitality. 

SiiySterely yours, /"\ 

Deborah S. Dalton 

Executive Secretary 

Regulatory Negotiation Committee 

c c : £/Bob Ajax , EPA 

Tom Kittleman, DuPont 

Jim Kennedy, DuPont
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for
the periods presented in the Report.
   /s/ C. Neil Lyons

C. Neil LyonsChief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer)
§ 37.91 Wheelchair locations and food service on intercity rail trains. ( a ) As soon as practicable, but in no event later than July 26, 1995, each person providing intercity rail service shall provide on each train a number of spaces— ( 1 ) To park wheelchairs (to accommodate individuals who wish to remain in their wheelchairs) equal to not less than one half of the number of single level rail passenger coaches in the train; and
( 2 ) To fold and store wheelchairs (to accommodate individuals who wish to transfer to coach seats) equal to not less than one half the number of single level rail passenger coaches in the train.
( b ) As soon as practicable, but in no event later than July 26, 2000, each person providing intercity rail service shall provide on each train a number of spaces— ( 1 ) To park wheelchairs (to accommodate individuals who wish to remain in their wheelchairs) equal to not less than the total number of single level rail passenger coaches in the train; and
( 2 ) To fold and store wheelchairs (to accommodate individuals who wish to transfer to coach seats) equal to not less than the total number of single level rail passenger coaches in the train.
( c ) In complying with paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, a person providing intercity rail service may not provide more than two spaces to park wheelchairs nor more than two spaces to fold and store wheelchairs in any one coach or food service car.
( d ) Unless not practicable, a person providing intercity rail transportation shall place an accessible car adjacent to the end of a single level dining car through which an individual who uses a wheelchair may enter.
( e ) On any train in which either a single level or bi-level dining car is used to provide food service, a person providing intercity rail service shall provide appropriate aids and services to ensure that equivalent food service is available to individuals with disabilities, including individuals who use wheelchairs, and to passengers traveling with such individuals. Appropriate auxiliary aids and services include providing a hard surface on which to eat.
( f ) This section does not require the provision of securement devices on intercity rail cars.
-----Original Message-----

From: mailagent@thesoftedge.com [mailto:mailagent@thesoftedge.com] 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: Stop Wall Street from draining Americans' retirement savings RIN 1210-AB32

Dear U.S. Department of Labor:

Millions of Americans like me are counting on our 401(ks) and retirement accounts for a secure financial 

future -- and we've worked hard to build and grow our savings.

These plans often involve complex financial decisions, so many of us have to use investment 

professionals for guidance. We should be able to trust our financial advisers to put our interests first. 

But loopholes in the current rules make it easy for some advisers to take advantage of hard-working 

Americans and line their own pockets with our retirement savings.

Last year alone, hidden fees, unnecessary risk and bad investment advice robbed Americans of as much 

as $17 billion.

Financial advisers should be working in our best interest. It's time to close this loophole and ensure a 

high standard that holds anyone who gives financial advice genuinely accountable for helping everyday 

Americans choose the best retirement investments for us, our families, and our future -- not just the 

ones that make our brokers and bankers richer.

A good rule will ensure that all financial professionals who offer retirement investment advice must 

make recommendations designed to serve the best interests of consumers by keeping costs low, 

recommending sound investments, and protecting retirement nest eggs from unnecessary risks.

DOL should close the loophole now. Americans who've worked hard to save for retirement deserve 

peace of mind about their financial security.

Sincerely,
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1237.html[7/22/2015 8:59:43 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jve-yntp

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1237

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Eric Albright

Address:

5844 Forest Crossing

Erie, PA, 16506

Email: soapinerie@netzero.net

Phone: 814-881-2367

General Comment

Stay out of my 401K. I have worked to damn hard over the years saving for my retirement to allow a government

 take over with all kinds of regulations. It's not you money, it's mine.
From: Tom Van Meter [mailto:tom@forteresidential.org] 

Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 8:25 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: Definition of Fiduciary Proposal Rule

To Whom it May Concern,

I would like to express my opposition to the proposed rule regarding the definition of a fiduciary

which includes mandating that all valuators of private company ESOP stock be fiduciaries to the

ESOP they value. In my opinion, the valuator should be an independent third party.

Forte Residential, Inc. is presently prefunding our ESOP. We are excited about the retirement

benefits our ESOP will provide to our employees. As the founder and owner of the company I

am pleased to know that our mission and philosophy will continue to the next generation(s) of

owners.

Sincerely,

Tom Van Meter

Forte Residential, Inc. - President 

703 N. Huntington St. 

Syracuse, IN 46567 

Phone: 574-528-6398 

Website: 

www.forteresidential.org

Statement of Confidentiality: The information in this message is privileged and confidential and is intended

only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended

recipient, you are hereby notified that you are prohibited from disseminating, distributing, or copying the

information contained in this message.  If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and

destroy all copies of the original message.