alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Seasonal Adjustment Factors for Retail Inventories by Kind of Business

   NAICS           Kind of Business                              Feb 23  Mar 23  Apr 23  May 23  Jun 23  Jul 23  Aug 23  Sep 23  Oct 23  Nov 23  Dec 23  Jan 24  Feb 24  Mar 24  Apr 24  May 24  Jun 24
   code
            Retail Inventories, total                             0.995   1.010   0.999   0.992   0.994   0.977   0.985   1.007   1.037   1.033   0.982   0.988   0.999   1.004   1.001   0.994   0.988
        441 Motor vehicle and parts dealers                       1.013   1.024   1.016   1.007   1.008   0.971   0.976   0.979   0.995   1.012   1.000   1.008   1.014   1.011   1.020   1.011   0.997
   442, 443 Furniture, home furn, electronics, and appliances     0.973   0.971   0.973   0.977   0.985   0.989   0.991   1.016   1.079   1.087   0.986   0.964   0.975   0.974   0.973   0.977   0.986
        444 Building mat. and garden equip. and supplies dealer   1.020   1.054   1.055   1.029   1.001   0.982   0.978   0.984   0.990   0.969   0.961   0.980   1.019   1.053   1.055   1.028   1.001
        445 Food and beverage stores                              0.981   0.997   0.995   0.997   0.995   0.983   0.984   0.998   1.029   1.037   1.012   0.989   0.982   0.997   0.993   0.995   0.994
        448 Clothing and clothing access. stores                  0.983   1.001   0.999   0.988   0.985   0.990   1.002   1.036   1.070   1.060   0.933   0.949   0.987   1.000   0.997   0.986   0.982
        452 General merchandise stores                            0.968   0.982   0.977   0.969   0.971   0.973   0.998   1.060   1.111   1.091   0.951   0.951   0.966   0.976   0.984   0.975   0.966
       4521 Department stores                                     0.952   0.983   0.979   0.957   0.943   0.950   0.974   1.093   1.192   1.143   0.904   0.929   0.953   0.981   0.978   0.956   0.944

Note:  Estimates are adjusted for seasonal variations.  Each month, new factors are developed using the latest estimates and applied to the not adjusted preliminary and final estimates and to the
estimates of the previous year that correspond to the preliminary month.  Adjustment factors are not included in this table for those kinds of business for which adjusted estimates are not shown
separately.  Adjusted inventory data are obtained by dividing the not adjusted data by the adjustment factors above for the corresponding kind of business.  Adjusted estimates for the summary
trade totals are obtained by summarizing the adjusted estimates for the individual kind of business.  The options used to derive factors for each kind of business were selected during the last
benchmarking operation and will not be subject to modification until the next benchmarking operation.  These options are available upon request.

SOURCE: MONTHLY RETAIL TRADE SURVEY
        RETAIL INDICATORS BRANCH
        U.S. CENSUS BUREAU

Last Revised Date: MAY 15, 2024
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1294.html[7/22/2015 10:02:48 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jve-kko6

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1294

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Charles Wolfe

General Comment

Greetings: I am writing to oppose the government at any level interfering with my retirement. I worked many

 years, overcame many obstacles to accumulate enough to retire and now am competent to live out my retirement

 without your help. Please don't regulate my legally acquired retirement funds Charles R Wolfe
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 5/1/15 9:43 AM

Received: April 29, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8ikm-bi3g

Comments Due: July 06, 2015

Submission Type: API

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0259

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Scott Knapp

Address: 

5910 Mineral Point Rd.

Madison, WI, 53705

Email: scott.knapp@cunamutual.com

Phone: 608-665-8486

Organization: CUNA Mutual Group

General Comment

I write in qualified support for the Department of Labor's ("Department") newly proposed 

conflict of interest rules. 

I applaud the Department's efforts to protect investors who receive advice when preparing for 

one of the biggest changes they will face in their lifetimes. Decisions made before and during 

retirement can be improved with the assistance of good investment advice. But the 

consequences of poor advice can be irreversable, so extra care must be taken by regulators to 

ensure certain high standards are maintained.

The Department's proposal represents a step in the right direction, and it is my hope that it will 

emerge from the public comment period and hearings unchanged. It is, however, a small step in 

the right direction rather than a large improvement over the current state. Indeed, investors 

benefit because the proposal expands the conditions under which advisors are deemed 

fiduciaries and are therefore held to a higher standard of care. But investors also lose because 

the proposal relaxes the standard of care to which the expanded universe of fiduciaries is held 

versus the current state. Prior to the proposal, conflicts of interest were mostly prohibited. Now 

Page 1 of 2

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481ac3dc2&format=xml&showor... 5/1/2015
material conflicts(revenue sharing for example) are acceptable under a "best interest contract" 

that could become a minor bureaucratic consideration when providing advice regarding IRA or 

qualified plan assets. 

Investors gain by having more advisors held to a fiduciary standard, but they lose as standards 

are relaxed. Given that, it is hard to see how investors will experience benefits that outweigh the 

costs of compliance with the proposal - costs that will most certainly be passed along to 

investors. In a perfect world, the proposal would be strengthened to expand the definition of a 

fiduciary while maintaining current prohibitions against conflicts of interest. If that isn't 

possible, it is my hope that the current proposal will be the first of many steps toward providing 

investors with more protections against conflicts of interest. 

Page 2 of 2

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481ac3dc2&format=xml&showor... 5/1/2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE INTERIM
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         107,370
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               149,163
<PP&E>                                          40,332
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,371
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 241,568
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,785,643
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    35,927,266
<OTHER-SE>                                (37,471,341)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   241,568
<SALES>                                          9,229
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,229
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  185,261
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (231)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,043
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (210,844)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (210,844)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
        

<FN>
<F1>LOSS PER SHARE ON A FULLY DILUTED BASIS IS NOT CALCULATED SINCE THE EFFECT
IS ANTIDILUTIVE.
</FN>

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

135006 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PATRICIA EVANISH, Personal Stephen J. Markman, Representative of the Estate of Justices Nick R. Evanish, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 135006 COA: 259995 Genesee CC: 03-076214-NH JEFFREY LEDIS, D.O., GARY L. WEBER, D.O., DAVID DOBIES, D.O., REGIONAL CARDIOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.L.C., and GENESYS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 6, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to a ppeal, we REVERSE the judgmen t of the Court of Appeals because the plaintiff falls with in the class of plaintiffs en titled to relief identified in our
order in Mullins v St Joseph Mercy Hospital (Docket No. 131879), ___ Mich ___ (decided 11/28/07). We REMAND this case to the Genesee Circuit Co urt for entry of an order denying the defendant s' motion for summary di sposition and for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order and the order in Mullins . In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not p ersuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l1217 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 8, 2008

Clerk
H. Res. 249

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 2, 2001.

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the

House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: Mr. Bryant to rank

after Mr. Goodlatte and Mr. Pence.

Attest:

Clerk.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 23, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 57460]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18153]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than September 7, 2023.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414. 
Comments can also be sent electronically to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#094a6664646c677d7a2768797965606a687d6066677a496a6160276f7b6b27667b6e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3f7c5052525a514b4c115e4f4f53565c5e4b5650514c7f5c575611594d5d11504d58">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Greg Remus, Sara Remus, Alexander Remus and Zachary Remus, all 
of Oconomowoc, Wisconsin; to form the Remus Family Control Group, a 
group acting in concert, to retain voting shares of Westbury Bancorp, 
Inc., and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Westbury Bank, 
both of Waukesha, Wisconsin.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2023-18153 Filed 8-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Foreign Assets Control

# AGENCY:

Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them.

# DATES:

                        See                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                         section for effective date.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

OFAC: Andrea Gacki, Director, tel.: 202-622-2490; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-622-2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or Assistant Director for Sanctions Enforcement, Compliance & Analysis, tel.: 202-622-2490.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Electronic Availability

                    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available on OFAC's website (                    *https://www.treasury.gov/​ofac*).                

## Notice of OFAC Action(s)

On August 16, 2023, OFAC determined that the property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following persons are blocked under the relevant sanctions authority listed below.
      ( print page 57175)    

Dated: August 16, 2023.

Andrea M. Gacki,

Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the Treasury.

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P

[FR Doc. 2023-17985 Filed 8-21-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-C
Editorial Note on Part 387
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 387 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 387.413 Forms and procedures. ( a ) *Forms.* Endorsements for policies of insurance, surety bonds, certificates of insurance, applications to qualify as a self-insurer or for approval of other securities or agreements, and notices of cancellation must be in the form prescribed at 49 CFR part 387, subpart C.
( b ) *Procedure.* Certificates of insurance, surety bonds, and notices of cancellation must be electronically filed with the FMCSA.
( c ) *Names.* Certificates of insurance and surety bonds shall be issued in the full name (including any trade name) of the individual, partnership (all partners named), corporation, or other person holding or to be issued the permit.
( d ) *Cancellation.* Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, certificates of insurance, surety bonds, and other securities and agreements shall not be cancelled or withdrawn until 30 days after the FMCSA receives written notice from the insurance company, surety, freight forwarder, or other party, as the case may be.
( e ) *Termination by replacement.* Certificates of insurance or surety bonds may be replaced by other certificates of insurance, surety bonds, or other security, and the liability of the retiring insurer or surety shall be considered as having terminated as of the replacement's effective date, if acceptable to the FMCSA.
[55 FR 11201, Mar. 27, 1990. Redesignated at 61 FR 54710, Oct. 21, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 49942, Sept. 24, 1997; 75 FR 35329, June 22, 2010; 80 FR 63710, Oct. 21, 2015; 84 FR 51434, Sept. 30, 2019] Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 82 FR 5310, Jan. 17, 2017, § 387.413 was suspended, effective Jan. 14, 2017. At 84 FR 51434, Sept. 30, 2019, the suspension was lifted and amendments were made to § 387.413. In that same document, § 387.413 was again suspended indefinitely.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fisher Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Robert C. Bateman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 9, 2004



/s/ Robert C. BatemanRobert C. BatemanSenior Vice PresidentChief Financial Officer
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 184

Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 28, 2001

Mr. FOLEY submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating majority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, The the following Member be and is hereby

2 elected to the following standing committees of the House

3 of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES: Mr. Forbes.

5 COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE: Mr. Forbes.

Æ
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

#### § 40.210 What kinds of drug tests are permitted under the regulations?

Both urine and oral fluid specimens are authorized for collection and testing under this part. An employer can use one or the other, but not both at the beginning of the testing event. For example, if an employee is sent for a test, either a urine or oral fluid specimen can be collected, but not both simultaneously. However, if there is a problem in the collection that necessitates a second collection (*e.g.,* insufficient quantity of urine, temperature out of range, or insufficient saliva), then a different specimen type could be chosen by the employer (*i.e.,* through a standing order or a discussion with the collector) or its service agent (*i.e.,* if there is no standing order and the service agent cannot contact the DER) to complete the collection process for the testing event. Only urine and oral fluid specimens screened and confirmed at HHS-certified laboratories (*see* § 40.81) are allowed for drug testing under this part. Point-of-collection (POC) urine, POC oral fluid drug testing, hair testing, or instant tests are not authorized.

[88 FR 27649, May 2, 2023]
###### Editorial Note on Part 393

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 393 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 393.90 Buses, standee line or bar.

Except as provided below, every bus, which is designed and constructed so as to allow standees, shall be plainly marked with a line of contrasting color at least 2 inches wide or equipped with some other means so as to indicate to any person that he/she is prohibited from occupying a space forward of a perpendicular plane drawn through the rear of the driver's seat and perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the bus. Every bus shall have clearly posted at or near the front, a sign with letters at least one-half inch high stating that it is a violation of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration's regulations for a bus to be operated with persons occupying the prohibited area. The requirements of this section shall not apply to any bus being transported in driveaway-towaway operation or to any level of the bus other that the level in which the driver is located nor shall they be construed to prohibit any seated person from occupying permanent seats located in the prohibited area provided such seats are so located that persons sitting therein will not interfere with the driver's safe operation of the bus.