alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Alfacell Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kuslima Shogen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|

|Date: December 10, 2007 |  |                               
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|                       
|                       
|                        |  | /s/ Kuslima Shogen            
|                        |  | Name: Kuslima Shogen          
|                        |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer
|                        |  | (Principal Executive Officer) 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Alfacell Corporation and will be retained by Alfacell Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                    Exhibit (23)-1
                                                    Unicom Corporation
                                                    Form 10-K  File No. 1-11375



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                   -----------------------------------------



     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in this Form 10-K of our report dated January 26, 1996 on Unicom
Corporation and subsidiary companies' consolidated financial statements as of
and for the year ended December 31, 1995 (Report), included in Unicom
Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 26, 1996, to the
inclusion in this Form 10-K of our report dated January 26, 1996, on the
supplemental schedule of Unicom Corporation as of and for the year ended
December 31, 1995, and to the incorporation of such reports into Unicom
Corporation's previously filed prospectuses dated March 18, 1994, constituting
part of Form S-4 Registration Statement File No. 33-52109, as amended (relating
to Common Stock of Unicom Corporation), as further amended by Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 on Form S-8 (relating to Commonwealth Edison Company's Employee
Savings and Investment Plan) and Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 on Form S-8
(relating to Unicom Corporation's Employee Stock Purchase Plan), Form S-8
Registration Statement File No. 33-56991 (relating to Unicom Corporation's Long-
Term Incentive Plan) and Form S-4 Registration Statement File No. 333-01003
(relating to the common stock of Unicom Corporation). We also consent to the
application of our Report, incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K, to
Commonwealth Edison Company and subsidiary companies' ratios of earnings to
fixed charges and the ratios of earnings to fixed charges and preferred and
preference stock dividend requirements for each of the years ended December 31,
1995, 1994 and 1993 appearing in Exhibit 99 of Unicom Corporation's Current
Report on Form 8-K dated January 26, 1996.



                                         ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Chicago, Illinois
March 28, 1996
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0988.html[7/21/2015 7:20:02 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvc-iz1y

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0988

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

My husband and I are capable of managing our own retirement.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Long Term Dementia Care in Nursing Homes.                    

*Date:*                         September 18, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Sandhya Sanghi, Ph.D., Scientific Research Officer, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue (2N230), NIA/SRB, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 496-2879,                         *sandhya.sanghi@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 11, 2023.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-17962 Filed 8-18-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 49265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4208]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[No. DoD-2007-HA-0022]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by 
September 27, 2007.
    Title, Associated Form and OMB Number: Statement of Personal 
Injury--Possible Third Party Liability, TRICARE Management Activity; DD 
Form 2527; OMB Control Number 0720-0003.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 133,000.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 133,000.
    Average Burden per Response: 20 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 33,250.
    Needs and Uses: The information is provided by CHAMPUS 
beneficiaries suffering from personal injuries and receiving medical 
care at Government expense. The information is necessary in the 
assertion of the Government's right to recovery under the Federal 
Medical Care Recovery Act. The data is used in the evaluation and 
processing of these claims.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households; Federal Government.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. John Kraemer.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Kraemer at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management 
Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 
22209-2133.

    Dated: August 22, 2007.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 07-4208 Filed 8-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
§ 520.22 Maintenance of a list of actions. ( a ) The Associate Administrator for Planning and Evaluation shall be responsible for the preparation and maintenance of a list of actions for which draft or final environmental impact statements have been or are to be prepared. This list shall be on file with the Associate Administrator for Planning and Evaluation and shall be available for public inspection in the Docket Section upon request. A copy of the initial list and its updatings at the end of each calendar quarter shall be transmitted by the Associate Administrator for Planning and Evaluation to TES and CEQ.
( b ) If a determination is made that an environmental statement is not necessary for a proposed action ( 1 ) which has been identified as normally requiring preparation of a statement,
( 2 ) which is similar to actions for which a significant number of statements have been prepared,
( 3 ) which the agency has previously announced would be the subject of a statement, or
( 4 ) for which the official responsible for such proposal has made a negative determination in response to a request from the CEQ, a record briefly setting forth the decision and the reasons for that determination shall be prepared by the responsible official. Such a record of negative determinations and any evaluations made pursuant to § 520.21 which conclude that preparation of a statement is not yet timely shall be prepared by the responsible official, submitted to the Associate Administrator for Planning and Evaluation, and made available by the Associate Administrator for Planning and Evaluation in the same manner as provided in paragraph (a) of this section for lists of statements under preparation.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KENNETH GREGORY WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; RICK COURSEY, Superintendent at Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution (EOCI); LEONARD WILLIAMSON, Inspector General at ODOC; MICHAEL F. GOWER, Assistant Administrator at ODOC; MICHAEL POPE, Correctional Officer at ODOC; DAVID POWELL, Disciplinary Hearings Officer at EOCI,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 19

- 35404

D.C. No. 6:17

- cv

- 01695

- AA

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ann L. Aiken, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2022 * *

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2 ). 

# FILED

APR 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 35404

Oregon state prisoner Kenneth Gregory Williams appeals pro se from the

district court ’ s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging due

process and Eighth Amendment violations

. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review de novo. Toguchi v. Chung , 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir.

2004). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Williams’s due

process claim because Williams failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as

to whether the discipline impos ed infringed on a protected liberty interest , or

whether the discipline lacked any evidentiary basis

. See Sandin v. Conner , 515

U.S. 472, 483

- 85 (1995) (a prison er has no federal or state protected liberty interest

when the sanction imposed neither invariably extends the length of his sentence

nor imposes an “atypical and significant hardship on the inmate in relation to the

ordinary incidents of prison life”) ; Bu rnsworth v. Gunderson , 179 F.3d 771, 775

(9th Cir. 1999) ( no due process violation unless “a conviction was totally

unsupported by evidence”).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Williams’s Eighth

Amendment claim because Williams failed to raise a genuine dispute of material

fact as to whether defendants’ conduct deprived him of “the minimal civilized

measure of life’s necessi ties.” Lemire v. Cal

. Dep’t of Corr. & Rehab. , 726 F.3d

1062, 1074 (9th Cir. 2013) (internal quotation marks omitted).3 19

- 35404

We reject as without merit Williams’s contention s that the discovery process

was un fair.

AFFIRMED.
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-3408

___________________________ Louis F. Castro
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security Administration

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Harrison

____________ Submitted: September 24, 2020 Filed: October 8, 2020 [Unpublished]

____________ Before COLLOTON, BENTON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.Louis Castro appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the denial of disability

insurance benefits and supplemental security income. After consideration of Moore’s arguments for reversal, we agree with the court that substantial evidence in the record as a whole supports the adverse decision. See Twyford v. Comm’r, Soc. Sec. Admin., 929 F.3d 512, 516 (8th Cir. 2019) (de novo review of district court’s judgment; this court will affirm unless Commissioner’s findings are unsupported by substantial evidence or result from legal error). Specifically, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the administrative law judge’s (ALJ) finding that Castro’s back impairment did not meet listing 1.04(A), as his pre-operative nerve root compression lasted less than 12 months, see Karlix v. Barnhart, 457 F.3d 742, 747 (8th Cir. 2006) (upholding denial of benefits where plaintiff failed to demonstrate that his impairment met listing for continuous 12-month period); and his post-operative neuroforaminal stenosis did not meet the requirements of the listing, see McDade v. Astrue, 720 F.3d 994, 1001 (8th Cir. 2013) (upholding ALJ’s conclusion that claimant’s back impairment did not meet listing 1.04 where he presented evidence of spinal stenosis, but no evidence of compromised nerve root or spinal cord). We also conclude that substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s finding that Castro did not have a severe mental impairment, see Johnston v. Apfel, 210 F.3d 870, 874-75 (8th Cir. 2000) (substantial evidence supported ALJ’s decision that claimant’s mental impairments were non-severe, as record showed symptoms were related to concern about physical conditions and improved with medication, and claimant maintained good activities of daily living); and that the ALJ did not err in failing to order a psychological consultative examination, see McCoy v. Astrue, 648 F.3d 605, 612 (8th Cir. 2011) (ALJ is required to order medical examination only if medical records presented to him do not give sufficient evidence to determine whether claimant is disabled).

1 The Honorable Erin L. Wiedemann, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). -2-The judgment is affirmed.

______________________________

-3-
**Exhibit 10.16**

**AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE**

**TO THE**

**UNICOM CORPORATION**

**DEFERRED COMPENSATION UNIT PLAN**

**(as amended through October 25, 1995)**

**WHEREAS**, Unicom Corporation, an Illinois corporation (“Unicom”), heretofore adopted and maintained the Unicom Corporation Deferred Compensation Unit Plan, as amended through October 25, 1995 (the “Plan”);

**WHEREAS**, Exelon Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation (the “Company”), has succeeded to the rights and obligations ofUnicom, including the rights and obligations of Unicom under the terms of the Plan; 

**WHEREAS**, pursuant to Section 6 of thePlan, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) has retained the power to amend the Plan; and 

**WHEREAS,** theBoard has authorized the amendment of the Plan to bring the Plan into compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). 

**NOW THEREFORE**, pursuant to the power of amendment contained in Section 6 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as ofJanuary 1, 2008, by adding the following new Section 8 thereto: 

(8) *Section 409A.* This Plan is intended to complywith the provisions of Section 409A of the Code, and shall be interpreted and construed accordingly, and the timing of all payments under the Plan shall be modified as necessary to comply therewith. As permitted under Section 409A of theCode, the payment of current compensation units and retirement compensation units concurrently with the payment of cash dividends on shares of the Company’s Common Stock is intended to constitute the payment of earnings pursuant to a fixedschedule during the holder’s employment, in the case of current compensation units, and during 

the holder’s life, in the case of retirement compensation units. To the extent the Company determines that, for purposes of Section 409A of theCode, retirement compensation units constitute the payment of a deferred compensation benefit that is payable upon the holder’s separation from service, then any retirement compensation units that would be payable to a “specifiedemployee,” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code, during the six-month period beginning on such employee’s separation from service shall be delayed and paid to such employee within 30 days after the earlier to occur of(i) the end of such six-month period or (ii) the date of the employee’s death. 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the Company hascaused this instrument to be executed by its duly authorized agent on this                  day of                        , 2008. 

 
EXELON CORPORATIONBy 
 

 

2
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1220.html[7/22/2015 3:57:29 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvd-9ddb

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1220

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

It is not your money to tell me how to plan, spend, my money, for daily or retirement. keep your hands off my

 retirement fund, Don't tread on my retirement.
RODNEY P. FRELINGHUYSEN 

11 t 01~ I 111 . \; ·,•, J1 •l'. I 

I__] 2.'3•JH HAYeunr~ H0tJS1 01 r·1 B11111 1~.<. 

\.VA'-IH"H ,T11'., 0(: ?Ufl1',-3(JI 1 

12011 'JJS '".C3& 

01~Tm(.1 ur ncc 

Si LI \If) F1 O•)R 

Murnw r 11~·. ~ ... NJ 07'.l60 

m1~· .J~4 01 11 

<!Congress of tbe Wnlteb ~tates 

Jt)ouse of l\eprcsentati\.le.s 

~ilSfJtltgt n, IDCC 20515-30ll 

Honorable Thomas E. Perez 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Labor 

200 Constitution Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20210-0001 

Dear Secretary Perez: 

September 9, 2015 

cov~ . .unr-t· 

COMMITilL ON APPROt'R11\ I ION~ 

~·u: :o~ ''· 'Tlf 

DEFENSE CHAIRMAN 

ENERGY AND W•\TER 

DEVELOPMENT 

HOMELAND StCUHI I Y 

I am writing regarding the Department of Labor's (DOL) proposed 

rule: "Definition of the Term 'Fiduciary'; Conflict of Interest RuleRetirement Investment Advice." 

I am very concerned that this rulemaking could put the 

livelihoods of many in the finance and insurance industry at risk. 

Specifically, I recently met with dozens of constituent groups who 

raised concerns about this rule and proposed the following actions to 

improve it: 

• Clarify that the sale of proprietary products and recei~t 

of differential compensation are. consistent with the 

Impartial Conduct Standards required under the Best 

Interest Contract Exemption (BICE) and revised PTE-84- 4; 

• Remove BICE language "-.without regard to the financial ·· r 

other interest of the a~viser, financial· instit~tion, &Ry 

affiliate or other party," and insert language that ensures 

consistency with the existing ERISA duty of loyalty under 

Section 404; 

• DOL should provide guidance and examples regarding 

compliant sales practices regarding the sale of proprietary 

products and receipt of differential compensation. 

I would appreciate hearing if your department plans to address 

these concerns: 

RPF:td 

P. Frelinghuysen 

of Congress 

PRl•...,ffD f1\I f\f CY<.:ll I.., ~~Ar'Lll
-----Original Message----- 

From: alemariano@gmail.com [mailto:alemariano@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:46 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: Comment in support of RIN 1210-AB30 

April 25, 2010 

I am writing to support the interim final rule under the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 

(RIN 1210-AB30). 

I support the strong rule that would forbid insurance companies from 

charging higher copayments, deductibles, and other out-of-pocket 

expenses for mental health treatment than they would for other physical 

health care. Thank you for ensuring that mental health care and 

physical health care coverage are included in a single deductible. 

Sincerely, 

Alessandra Mariano 

155 Sycamore St 

Somerville, MA 02145