alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF A PPEAL S EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS

PRI SCI L L A RASCO, Appellant,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

. § § § § § § No. 08-09-00313- CR

Appea l from 243rd District Court of El Paso County , Texas (TC # 20040D01290)

MEMORAN DUM OP INION Priscilla Rasco attempts to appeal a conviction for possession of a chemica l with intent to unlawfully

manufa cture a controlled substance. F inding that Appe llant has no rig ht of appe al, we dismiss the appe al. Rule 25.2 g overns a defe ndant’s rig ht of appea l in a criminal case . The rule provides that the trial court must enter a cer tification of the defe ndant’s rig ht of appea l in ever y case in which it enter s
a judgme nt of g uilt or other appea lable order

. T E X .R.A P P .P. 25.2(d). Fur ther, the rule require s the trial court to ce rtify

whether the def endant ha s a rig ht of appe al. Id

. Appellant filed a timely notice of appea l, incl u d i n g t h e trial court’s cer tification of the defe ndant’s rig ht to appeal a s require d by Rules 25.2(a)( 2) and 25.2(d). The ce rtification re flec ts that the appeal “is a plea-bar g ain case, and the defendant has NO rig ht of appe al.” The trial court also cer tified that Appellant waived the rig ht to appea l. On Dec ember 11, 2009, the Clerk’s Offic e notified Appellant’s counsel that the cer tification ref

lects Appellant has no rig ht of appea l and reque sted counsel file a letter brief on the issue no later than Dec ember 21, 2009. No response has been r ece ived. B ased on the trial court’ s cer tification, we dismiss the appea l.J anuar

y 29, 2010 ANN CRAWFORD McCL URE, J ustice Be fore Chew, C.J ., McClure, a nd Rivera, JJ

. (Do Not Publish)
1210-AB32-2-1078.html[7/24/2015 5:11:12 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-37jc

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1572

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Darrell Arnett

General Comment

Do not restrict in any way my use of my retirement that I worked and saved for. It's not your money keep your

 hans off it.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 218

Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 1, 2001

Mr. FROST submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating minority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following named Member be, and

2 is hereby, elected to the following standing committee of

3 the House of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS OF OFFICIAL CONDUCT:

5 Mr. Green of Texas.

Æ
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1144.html[7/22/2015 2:41:34 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvd-kdka

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1144

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Gary Gillmor

General Comment

I do not need or want the Federal Government planning, regulating, or implementing other restrictive measures

 to my retirement .
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0537.html[7/20/2015 8:21:09 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jva-l74d

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-0537

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: mary Anonymous

General Comment

I am able to plan for my own Retirement. Mary E. Jalbert
inspire
Capital
Management

September 11, 2015

Office of Regulations and Interpretations
Employee Benefits Security Administration
Attn: Conflict of Interest Rule

Room N-5655, U.S. Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue NW.
Washington, DC 20210

RIN 1210-AB32
Dear Sir or Madam:

I am very concerned with the Proposed Conflict of Interest Rule as written because the
enactment of this proposal specifically disallows the use of listed options in IRAs.

As an investment professional, I manage and advise my clients in regards to the proper
use of listed options in their IRAs — especially covered calls and protective puts. The
proper use of both covered calls and protective puts, by definition, reduces the inherent
risk of investing in common stocks.

The exclusion of both covered calls and protective puts from IRAs containing
common stock is the equivalent of prohibiting homeowners insurance from home
owners.

The current savings crisis puts millions of Americans, especially those of the middle and
lower income levels, in a position in which they simply “cannot afford to lose”.
Diversification, many times is just not enough. The 2008 stock market selloff is a perfect
example to illustrate this point. The entire stock market dropped in value.
Diversification into different equity sectors did not make a large enough difference to
protect investors from losses. They lost money regardless. Investors nearing or at
retirement age cannot afford to take on the risk of the market.

Diversification into the fixed income asset class (or into annuities) could lower
investment risk. Unfortunately, the low interest rate environment makes it extremely
difficult for many investors to earn enough from fixed income (or annuities) to cover
their expenses. In turn, these investors have generally been forced to look for higher
return potential in the stock market. Once again, diversification is not a strong enough
tool to eliminate investment risk. This is a perfect example of an opportunity to use listed
options to reduce risk while maintaining the potential for more accommodating, positive
returns.


The elimination of listed options from IRAs would hurt investors, especially those in the
lower to middle income levels. The wealthy typically hold significant investment capital
outside of IRAs and would still have the ability to benefit from listed options. The
decision to disallow the use of covered calls and protective puts in IRAs, injures the very
people this proposal is most focused on helping.

On behalf of my clients and all Americans with IRA investments, I strongly encourage
you to continue to allow for the use of listed options in IRAs, especially covered calls and
protective puts.

If I may offer any further assistance in your decision, please contact me. I would be
happy to assist the Department in this important matter which affects all Americans.

Sincerely,

Mihat B M Yes
Michael P. McKee, CFP®
President, Inspire Capital Management, LLC.
#### § 224.105 Sheeting dimensions and quantity.

Retroreflective sheeting shall be applied along the length of each railroad freight car and locomotive side as described in § 224.106. Unless otherwise specified, retroreflective sheeting applied under this part shall be applied in strips 4 inches wide and 18 or 36 inches long, as practicable. The amount of retroreflective sheeting to be applied to each car or locomotive subject to this part is dependent on the length of the car or locomotive and the color of the sheeting. For purposes of this part, the length of a railroad freight car or locomotive is measured from endsill to endsill, exclusive of the coupler and draft gear. Each side of a railroad freight car subject to this part, including each unit of multi-unit cars, and each side of a locomotive subject to this part must be equipped with at least the minimum amount of retroreflective sheeting specified in Table 2 of this subpart.
1210-AB32-2-1487.html[7/26/2015 5:58:19 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwh-dfjy

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1983

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I am smart enough to manage my retirement funds. I do not need or want beauticians (read: corrupt or

 incompetent persons who do not have my best interests at heart) to meddle.
Nicholson to succeed Campbell as commander in Afghanistan
 
  By Lisa Ferdinando, DoD News
  **WASHINGTON (Jan. 27, 2016) —** The U.S. Army commander of NATO land forces has been
selected to succeed Army Gen. John F. Campbell as the commander of U.S. and
NATO forces in Afghanistan, the Pentagon press secretary said today. Army Lt. Gen. John W.
"Mick" Nicholson Jr. is an accomplished soldier with extensive
command experience in Afghanistan and around the world, Peter Cook said at a
news briefing, reading a statement from Defense Secretary Ash Carter. Carter is "absolutely
confident" in the man President Barack Obama intends to nominate to
succeed Campbell, Cook said. The nomination and Nicholson’s accompanying
promotion to four-star rank require Senate confirmation. The defense secretary believes
Nicholson will build upon Campbell’s hard work to "secure a bright future
for the Afghan people, and help the government of Afghanistan strengthen a
professional and capable security partner to the American people," Cook
said, adding that the secretary thanks Campbell for his extraordinary
leadership and dedication to the mission in Afghanistan. Carter credits Campbell with taking
the fight to al-Qaida and making clear the resolve to deny it safe haven, and
with consistently identifying ways to increase the capability and capacity of
the Afghan forces, Cook said. "While many challenges remain,
we have made gains over the past year that will put Afghanistan on a better
path, and much of the credit for that progress rests with General
Campbell," he said. **Extraordinary Career, Personal
Sacrifice** For nearly 18 months, Campbell has
given his all to the mission as the top commander in Afghanistan, Cook said.
"His personal sacrifices on behalf of his troops and the Afghan people
will be remembered by us all," he added. Carter personally thanks Campbell as
his tour comes to a close for "everything he has done to bring us to this
moment in Afghanistan and for all that he has done throughout his extraordinary
career," Cook said. **Understands Complexity of Mission** Nicholson has led soldiers at all
levels, the press secretary said, from platoon to division in Airborne, Ranger,
mechanized, Stryker and light infantry units in five infantry divisions and the
75th Ranger Regiment. He commanded the 82nd Airborne
Division, re-establishing Global Response Force capabilities, and commands
NATO’s Allied Land Command in his current assignment, the spokesman added. "He knows what it means to lead
a responsive and nimble force, and how to build the capacity of our partners to
respond to immediate and long-term threats, and remain adaptable to confront
evolving challenges," Cook said. Carter believes Nicholson understands the
importance and complexity of the mission in Afghanistan, Cook said. He noted
that the general has served in multiple related capacities, including as chief
of staff of operations for the International Security Assistance Force and U.S.
Forces Afghanistan, as director of the Pakistan/Afghanistan coordination cell
for the Joint Staff, and as deputy commander for stability in ISAF Regional
Command South.
<iframe
	src="pubs_banner.htm" 
	name="iframe banner" 
	width="100%" 
	height="100%"
	scrolling="no">









<iframe 
	src="SR.HTML"
	name="iframe main" width="100%" height="100%">





<iframe
	src="pubs_toc.htm"
	name="iframe contents" width="100%" height="100%">
§ 552.4 Requirements for petition. A petition filed under this part should be addressed and submitted to: Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 400 Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20590. Each petition filed under this part must: ( a ) Be written in the English language;
( b ) Have, preceding its text, a heading that includes the word “Petition”;
( c ) Set forth facts which it is claimed establish that an order is necessary;
( d ) Set forth a brief description of the substance of the order which it is claimed should be issued; and
( e ) Contain the name and address of the petitioner.
H. Res. 240 

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

September 20, 2001. 

Resolved, That the amendment of the Senate to the bill 

(H.R. 2500) entitled ‘‘An Act making appropriations for the 

Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, 

and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 

2002, and for other purposes’’, in the opinion of this House, 

contravenes the first clause of the seventh section of the first 

article of the Constitution of the United States and is an infringement of the privileges of this House and that such bill 

be respectfully returned to the Senate with a message communicating this resolution. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
§ 33.34 Preferential scheduling. ( a ) A person must schedule operations, including the acquisition of all needed production items or services, in a timely manner to satisfy the delivery requirements of each rated order. Modifying production or delivery schedules is necessary only when required delivery dates for rated orders cannot otherwise be met.
( b ) DO-rated orders must be given production or performance preference over unrated orders, if necessary to meet required delivery dates, even if this requires the diversion of items being processed or ready for delivery or services being performed against unrated orders. Similarly, DX-rated orders must be given preference over DO-rated orders and unrated orders. (Examples: If a person receives a DO-rated order with a delivery date of June 3 and if meeting that date would mean delaying production or delivery of an item for an unrated order, the unrated order must be delayed. If a DX-rated order is received calling for delivery on July 15 and a person has a DO-rated order requiring delivery on June 2 and operations can be scheduled to meet both deliveries, there is no need to alter production schedules to give any additional preference to the DX-rated order.)
( c ) *Conflicting rated orders.* ( 1 ) If a person finds that delivery or performance against any accepted rated orders conflicts with the delivery or performance against other accepted rated orders of equal priority status, the person shall give precedence to the conflicting orders in the sequence in which they are to be delivered or performed (not to the receipt dates). If the conflicting orders are scheduled to be delivered or performed on the same day, the person shall give precedence to those orders that have the earliest receipt dates.
( 2 ) If a person is unable to resolve rated order delivery or performance conflicts under this section, the person should promptly seek special priorities assistance as provided in §§ 33.40 through 33.44. If the person's customer objects to the rescheduling of delivery or performance of a rated order, the customer should promptly seek special priorities assistance as provided in §§ 33.40 through 33.44. For any rated order against which delivery or performance will be delayed, the person must notify the customer as provided in § 33.33.
( d ) If a person is unable to purchase needed production items in time to fill a rated order by its required delivery date, the person must fill the rated order by using inventoried production items. A person who uses inventoried items to fill a rated order may replace those items with the use of a rated order as provided in § 33.37(b).
#### § 379.11 Waiver of requirements of the regulations in this part.

A waiver from any provision of the regulations in this part may be made by the Secretary upon his/her own initiative or upon submission of a written request by the company. Each request for waiver shall demonstrate that unusual circumstances warrant a departure from prescribed retention periods, procedures, or techniques, or that compliance with such prescribed requirements would impose an unreasonable burden on the company.
Exhibit 10.2



 







EXHIBIT 10.2




FIRST AMENDMENT TO

SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this
“Amendment”) is entered into effective as of March 27, 2006, by and between CancerVax
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and William R. LaRue
(“Executive”).



     WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend that certain Second Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement dated as of November 15, 2004, between the Company and Executive (as amended
to date, the “Original Agreement”) on the terms and conditions set forth herein.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the various covenants and agreements hereinafter set
forth, the parties hereto agree as follows:



     1. Amendment to Section 4(g)(v). A new sentence is added at the end of Section
4(g)(v) of the Original Agreement to read as follows:



                  “Notwithstanding the foregoing, none of the Stock Awards granted to Executive on March 27,
2006 shall accelerate pursuant to clauses (i), (ii), (iii) or (iv) of this Section 4(g).”



     2. No Other Amendments. Except as expressly provided for in this Amendment, no other
term or provision of the Original Agreement is amended or modified in any respect.



(Signature Page Follows)




 









 





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first set forth
above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	CANCERVAX CORPORATION
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ David F. Hale
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	David F. Hale
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ William R. LaRue
	 	 	 
	 	 	William R. LaRue






[SIGNATURE PAGE TO FIRST AMENDMENT TO SECOND

AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT]
#### §§ 392.40-392.41 [Reserved]
----

| (1)   | the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | August 6, 2009 | /s/ William M. Salters  |   |
|--------|----------------|------------------------------|--------|
|   |           | William M. Salters           |   |
|   |           | Chief Financial Officer      |   |

----
# July 26: Military airstrikes continue against ISIS terrorists in Syria and Iraq

/ Published July 26, 2017
July 26, 2017Release # 20170726-01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**SOUTHWEST ASIA -** On July 25, Coalition military forces conducted 27 strikes consisting of 32 engagements against ISIS terrorists in Syria and Iraq.In Syria, Coalition military forces conducted 25 strikes consisting of 30 engagements against ISIS targets.* Near Dayr Az Zawr, one strike destroyed an ISIS oil tanker trailer and a well-head.* Near Raqqah, 24 strikes engaged 14 ISIS tactical units; destroyed six fighting positions, four observation points, three sniper positions, two command and control nodes, two supply caches, two mortar systems, a VBIED, an ISIS communication tower, a front-end loader, an ammunition cache, a tactical vehicle, and a heavy machine gun; and suppressed a supply route.In Iraq, Coalition military forces conducted two strikes consisting of two engagements against ISIS targets.* Near Al Huwayjah, one strike engaged an ISIS tactical unit and destroyed a vehicle.* Near Kisik, one strike destroyed six ISIS rocket systems and an ISIS-held building.Additionally, 13 strikes were conducted in Syria and Iraq on July 24 that closed within the last 24 hours.* On July 24, near Kisik, Iraq, one strike damaged four ISIS vehicles.* On July 24, near Qayyarah, Iraq, one strike suppressed an ISIS tactical unit.* On July 24, near Raqqah, Syria, 10 strikes engaged five ISIS tactical units and destroyed five fighting positions, three oil refinement stills, a vehicle, a command and control node, and a weapons cache.* On July 24, near Abu Kamal, Syria, one strike destroyed three ISIS oil stills and a vehicle.These strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to destroy ISIS in Iraq and Syria.  The destruction of ISIS targets in Iraq and Syria also further limits the group's ability to project terror and conduct external operations throughout the region and the rest of the world.This Coalition strike release contains all strikes conducted by fighter, attack, bomber, rotary-wing, or remotely piloted aircraft, rocket propelled artillery and ground-based tactical artillery.A strike, as defined in the Coalition release, refers to one or more kinetic engagements that occur in roughly the same geographic location to produce a single, sometimes cumulative effect in that location.  For example, a single aircraft delivering a single weapon against a lone ISIS vehicle is one strike, but so is multiple aircraft delivering dozens of weapons against a group of ISIS-held buildings and weapon systems in a compound, having the cumulative effect of making that facility harder or impossible to use. Strike assessments are based on initial reports and may be refined.CJTF-OIR does not report the number or type of aircraft employed in a strike, the number of munitions dropped in each strike, or the number of individual munition impact points against a target. The information used to compile the daily strike releases is based on 'Z' or Greenwich Mean Time.
From: nvrrmore@aol.com [mailto:nvrrmore@aol.com] 

Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 12:36 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32 & ZRIN: 1210-ZA25

I do NOT support the Department of Labor's proposal to remove trading options in IRAs (RIN 1210-AB32 

& ZRIN 1210ZA25). I have invested in my IRAs for years now; I use two different brokerage firms. I have 

more than sufficient training in stocks & options (up to a Masters degree in more than one program). I 

use option trading to grow my account. This has been working GREAT for me. We do NOT need more 

government regulations telling me how to invest in my IRAs!!! I do NOT support removal of trading 

Options!!! Removal of that ability would GREATLY harm my ability to plan for my retirement!!!

Thank you,

Jenny Clark

Castro Valley, CA