alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40323 Conference Calendar

LEROY EVANS, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JOHN DALTON, Secretary of the Navy, Office of Personnel Management and Office of Special Counsel, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-96-565

- - - - - - - - - - October 23, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Leroy Evans, Jr., argues that the district court erred in dismissing his petition for mandamus relief in which Evans sought an order directing the Office of Special Counsel to reconsider Evan’s appeal of the denial of his request for the reclassification of his position as a management analyst. We have reviewed the record and the briefs and find that the district court’s dismissal of Evans’ petition for mandamus basedNo. 97-40323 -2- on the lack of subject matter jurisdiction should be affirmed substantially for the reasons adopted by the district court. See Evans v. Dalton , No. C-96-565 (S.D. Tex.; Jan. 14, 1997); DeLeonardis v. Weisman , 986 F.2d 725, 726 (5th Cir. 1993).
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32-3



Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code



The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Report on Form 10-K/A of Exelon Generation Company, LLC for the year ended
December 31, 2008, that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Exelon Generation Company, LLC.



|                        |  |                      
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------
|Date: February 18, 2009 |  | /s/    JOHN W.
ROWE  
|                        |  | John W. Rowe Chairman



69
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                 5
<MULTIPLIER>                          1,000
       
<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>           DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                5,591
<SECURITIES>                         47,259
<RECEIVABLES>                        13,186
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          0
<PP&E>                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       66,229
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     0
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                447
<OTHER-SE>                          (24,544)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         66,229
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          0
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      3,853
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       6,636<F1>
<INCOME-TAX>                          7,189<F2>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  13,825
<DISCONTINUED>                          207
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                         14,032
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.31
<FN>
<F1>  Income-pretax  includes other income of $8,000  resulting from a reduction
      in the litigation & contingency reserves.
<F2>  Income-tax  includes a 1977  income  tax refund of $7,613,  which has been
      recognized as an income tax benefit in the Statement of Operations.
</FN>

        

</TABLE>
#### § 32.670 Suspension.

*Suspension* means an action taken by a Federal agency that immediately prohibits a recipient from participating in Federal Government procurement contracts and covered nonprocurement transactions for a temporary period, pending completion of an investigation and any judicial or administrative proceedings that may ensue. A recipient so prohibited is suspended, in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation for procurement contracts (48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4) and the common rule, Government-wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), that implements Executive Order 12549 and Executive Order 12689. Suspension of a recipient is a distinct and separate action from suspension of an award or suspension of payments under an award.
§ 299.343 Initial inspection of new rail and welds. ( a ) The railroad shall provide for the initial inspection of newly manufactured rail, and for initial inspection of new welds made in either new or used rail. The railroad may demonstrate compliance with this section by providing for— ( 1 ) *Mill inspection.* A continuous inspection at the rail manufacturer's mill shall constitute compliance with the requirement for initial inspection of new rail, provided that the inspection equipment meets the applicable requirements as specified under the railroad's inspection, testing, and maintenance program and § 299.321. The railroad shall obtain a copy of the manufacturer's report of inspection and retain it as a record until the rail receives its first scheduled inspection under § 299.341;
( 2 ) *Welding plant inspection.* A continuous inspection at a welding plant, if conducted in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and accompanied by a plant operator's report of inspection which is retained as a record by the railroad, shall constitute compliance with the requirements for initial inspection of new rail and plant welds, or of new plant welds made in used rail; and
( 3 ) *Inspection of field welds.* Initial inspection of new field welds, either those joining the ends of CWR strings or those made for isolated repairs, shall be conducted before the start of revenue service in accordance with the railroad's inspection, testing, and maintenance program. The initial inspection may be conducted by means of portable test equipment. The railroad shall retain a record of such inspections until the welds receive their first scheduled inspection under § 299.341.
( b ) Each defective rail found during inspections conducted under paragraph (a)(3) of this section shall be marked with highly visible markings on both sides of the rail and the appropriate remedial action as set forth in § 299.341 will apply.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 187 (Thursday, September 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 54927]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4744]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Public Meeting by Teleconference Concerning Heavy Duty 
Diesel Engine Consent Decrees

    The Department of Justice and the Environmental Protection Agency 
will hold a public meeting on October 4, 2007 at 10 a.m. eastern time 
by teleconference. The subject of the meeting will be implementation of 
the provisions of the seven consent decrees signed by the United States 
and diesel engine manufacturers and entered by the United States 
District Court for the District of Columbia on July 1, 1999 (United 
States v. Caterpillar, Case No. 1:98CV02544; United States v. Navistar 
International Transportation Corporation, Case No. 1:98CV02545; United 
States v. Cummins Engine Company, Case No. 1:98CV02546; United States 
v. Detroit Diesel Corporation, Case No. 1:98CV02548; United States v. 
Volvo Truck Corporation, Case No. 1:98CV02547; United States v. Mack 
Trucks, Inc., Case No. 1:98CV01495; and United States v. Renault 
Vehicles Industries, S.A., Case No. 1:98CV02543). In supporting entry 
by the court of the decrees, the United States committed to meet 
periodically with states, industry groups, environmental groups, and 
concerned citizens to discuss consent decree implementation issues. 
Future meetings will be announced here and on EPA's Diesel Engine 
Settlement Web site at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/cases/civil/caa/diesel/index.html.
    Interested parties should contact the Environmental Protection 
Agency at the address listed below prior to the meeting to reserve a 
telephone line and receive instructions for the call.

Agenda

    1. Panel Remarks--10 a.m.
    Remarks by DOJ and EPA regarding implementation of the provisions 
of the diesel engine consent decrees.
    2. Public comments and questions.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne Wick, EPA Diesel Engine Consent 
Decree Coordinator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Mail Code 
2242A), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460, e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b4c3ddd7df9ad5dadad1f4d1c4d59ad3dbc2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="502739333b7e313e3e35103520317e373f26">[email protected]</span></a>.

Karen S. Dworkin,
Assistant Chief, Environment & Natural Resources Division, 
Environmental Enforcement Section.
[FR Doc. 07-4744 Filed 9-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Editorial Note on Part 393
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 393 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 393.41 Parking brake system. ( a ) *Hydraulic-braked vehicles manufactured on or after September 2, 1983.* Each truck and bus (other than a school bus) with a GVWR of 4,536 kg (10,000 pounds) or less which is subject to this part and school buses with a GVWR greater than 4,536 kg (10,000 pounds) shall be equipped with a parking brake system as required by FMVSS No. 571.105 (S5.2) in effect at the time of manufacture. The parking brake shall be capable of holding the vehicle or combination of vehicles stationary under any condition of loading in which it is found on a public road (free of ice and snow). Hydraulic-braked vehicles which were not subject to the parking brake requirements of FMVSS No. 571.105 (S5.2) must be equipped with a parking brake system that meets the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) *Air-braked power units manufactured on or after March 1, 1975, and air-braked trailers manufactured on or after January 1, 1975.* Each air-braked bus, truck and truck tractor manufactured on and after March 1, 1975, and each air-braked trailer except an agricultural commodity trailer, converter dolly, heavy hauler trailer or pulpwood trailer, shall be equipped with a parking brake system as required by FMVSS No. 121 (S5.6) in effect at the time of manufacture. The parking brake shall be capable of holding the vehicle or combination of vehicles stationary under any condition of loading in which it is found on a public road (free of ice and snow). An agricultural commodity trailer, heavy hauler or pulpwood trailer shall carry sufficient chocking blocks to prevent movement when parked.
( c ) *Vehicles not subject to FMVSS Nos. 105 and 121 on the date of manufacture.* ( 1 ) Each singly driven motor vehicle not subject to parking brake requirements of FMVSS Nos. 105 or 121 at the time of manufacturer, and every combination of motor vehicles must be equipped with a parking brake system adequate to hold the vehicle or combination on any grade on which it is operated, under any condition of loading in which it is found on a public road (free of ice and snow).
( 2 ) The parking brake system shall, at all times, be capable of being applied by either the driver's muscular effort or by spring action. If other energy is used to apply the parking brake, there must be an accumulation of that energy isolated from any common source and used exclusively for the operation of the parking brake. *Exception:* This paragraph shall not be applicable to air-applied, mechanically-held parking brake systems which meet the parking brake requirements of FMVSS No. 121 (S5.6).
( 3 ) The parking brake system shall be held in the applied position by energy other than fluid pressure, air pressure, or electric energy. The parking brake system shall not be capable of being released unless adequate energy is available to immediately reapply the parking brake with the required effectiveness.
[70 FR 48048, Aug. 15, 2005]
1210-AB32-2-1459.html[7/26/2015 5:23:28 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwf-efr4

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1955

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Brenda Schwartz

Address:

po box 1326

Salem, MO, 65560

Email: Butterflyn95@yahoo.com

General Comment

I can plan my own retirement!
1210-AB32-2-1370.html[7/26/2015 2:34:39 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jw0-onn5

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1866

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

In this FREE country it is time that the politicians start voting for policies and bills that will build the citizens up

 instead of tearing us down. For those of us that understand the meaning of "Retirement", which means we

 worked and saved for the future, we would like you to let us take care of our funds without your interference. (

 the Government) Don't take my money to give to those that haven't earned money or that didn't plan for their

 own retirement. Looks like it's almost time for another Boston Tea Party!
From: Frederic Schilling [mailto:ricschilling@comcast.net] 

Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 3:37 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: STOP the Fiduciary Rule

I am an financial representative and licensed in multiple states to conduct insurance to over 500 

clients. I am series 6 licensed so this rule will not effect my business. However this is simply 

another attempt of building more government control of our lives. Big government ends up 

costing money and putting more middle class America at a financial disadvantage.

The insurance industry is already highly regulated and has had by far a better track record of 

integrity than any other financial industry.

This is simply a move by the liberal administration to build more government control and more 

government jobs.

In God We Trust,

Frederic H. Schilling

President

www.seniorguardian.com

Ph# 888-891-3381

Fax # 904 371-1262

10151 Deerwood Pk Blvd

Bld 200, Suite 250

Jacksonville FL 32256

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email (and attachments, if any) is intended only for the use of the 

individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, 

confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you 

are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or use of this communication is 

strictly prohibited. If you have received this email (and attachments, if any) in error, please notify us 

immediately by reply email and delete. Thank you.

TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE: Pursuant to the requirements of the Internal Revenue Service Circular 

230, we advise you that any federal tax advice contained in this communication (including 

any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding 

penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing 

or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication.

This information is not intended to be tax or legal advice. Contact your tax or legal counsel regarding 

these matters. Securities offered though Center Street,Inc (CSS), a registered Broker-Dealer and member 

of FINRA/SIPC. Senior Guardians of America is independent of CSS
1210-AB32-2-1150.html[7/24/2015 6:36:47 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvr-f6lj

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1644

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Please do not change the current regulations regarding retirement plans. Any change could affect my family and

 millions like me. Thank you for your time.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/19/15 5:25 PM

Received: July 13, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jyb-6gik

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2162

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Steven Winslow

Address: 

4114 Valley Ridge Rd

Dallas, 75220

Email: winslow.07@gmail.com

Phone: 9728086681

General Comment

Dear DoL,

Stay out of my self-directed IRA. I am told that new regulations are proposed that will limit the 

choices for investments because the government thinks we are unable to make wise choices. 

On page 4 of the proposed regulation, DoL expresses the view that seldom can Americans 

prudently manage retirement benefits on their own and that they generally cannot distinguish 

good investments from bad.

And the government can? I think not. Stop turning the country into a nanny state.
1210-AB32-2-1060.html[7/23/2015 3:26:37 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvp-df3x

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1552

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Don Maresh

Address:

15585 Copper Mountain Road

Moreno Valley, CA, 92555

General Comment

Please do not regulate retirement (401k, etc;)

The govt. has no right to do this and has hurt Americans enough.

please retire Obama.....that is what you need to regulate.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsStacking-sequence optimization for buckling of laminated plates by integer programmingInteger-programming formulations for the design of symmetric and balanced laminated plates under biaxial compression are presented. Both maximization of buckling load for a given total thickness and the minimization of total thickness subject to a buckling constraint are formulated. The design variables that define the stacking sequence of the laminate are zero-one integers. It is shown that the formulation results in a linear optimization problem that can be solved on readily available software. This is in contrast to the continuous case, where the design variables are the thicknesses of layers with specified ply orientations, and the optimization problem is nonlinear. Constraints on the stacking sequence such as a limit on the number of contiguous plies of the same orientation and limits on in-plane stiffnesses are easily accommodated. Examples are presented for graphite-epoxy plates under uniaxial and biaxial compression using a commercial software package based on the branch-and-bound algorithm.Document ID19910012267Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsHaftka, Raphael T.*(Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ. Blacksburg., United States)*Walsh, Joanne L.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1991Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-104033AIAA PAPER 91-0970NAS 1.15:104033Meeting InformationMeeting: Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials ConferenceLocation: Baltimore, MDCountry: United StatesStart Date: April 8, 1991End Date: April 10, 1991Accession Number91N21580Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-168PROJECT: RTOP 506-43-41-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910012267.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024