alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date:

2 p.m., Thursday, October 4, 2007.

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered:

Rule Enforcement Review.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

David A. Stawick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-4684 Filed 9-18-07; 10:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
§ 520.28 Preparation of final environmental impact statements. ( a ) If the action is to go forward and the DEIS has not been changed to a negative declaration, as soon as practicable after the expiration of the comment period and hearing process, if any, the official responsible for the action shall prepare a final environmental impact statement (FEIS), taking into account all comments received and issues raised during such period and process.
( b ) The FEIS shall conform to the guidelines for form and content in Attachment 1.
( c ) The FEIS shall then be submitted to the Chief Counsel by the official responsible for the action, for determination of legal sufficiency.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-41379 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOHN ERIC MACIAS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC Nos. L-96-CR-19-1 C-01-CR-231

-------------------- October 30, 2002 Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appointed counsel for John Eric Macias has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Macias received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief and has filed a response. He submits that he does not challenge the conduct for which revocation of his supervised release was sought. Macias argues instead that because of his cooperation with the Government he must serve hisNo. 01-41379 -2- sentence in solitary confinement. This issue does not go to Macias’s direct appeal. Because Macias did not raise claims of ineffective assistance of counsel in the district court, no record was made relative to this issue. This court does not resolve claims of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal if the record is not sufficiently developed. See United
States v. Haese , 162 F.3d 359, 363 (5th Cir. 1998). Our independent review of the brief, the issue raised in Macias’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein. The APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

#### § 40.287 What information is an employer required to provide concerning SAP services to an employee who has a DOT drug and alcohol regulation violation?

As an employer, you must provide to each employee (including an applicant or new employee) who violates a DOT drug and alcohol regulation a listing of SAPs readily available to the employee and acceptable to you, with names, addresses, and telephone numbers. You cannot charge the employee any fee for compiling or providing this list. You may provide this list yourself or through a C/TPA or other service agent.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of CFO Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Comprehensive Care Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onMarch 17, 2008 (the “Report”), Robert J. Landis, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tothe best of his knowledge, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andshall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to Comprehensive Care Corporation and will be retained by Comprehensive Care Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 568.5 Requirements for intermediate manufacturers.

Each intermediate manufacturer of a vehicle manufactured in two or more stages shall furnish to the final-stage manufacturer the document required by 49 CFR 568.4 in the manner specified in that section. If any of the changes in the vehicle made by the intermediate manufacturer affects the validity of the statements in the IVD, that manufacturer shall furnish an addendum to the IVD that contains its name and mailing address and an indication of all changes that should be made in the IVD to reflect changes that it made to the vehicle. The addendum shall contain a certification by the intermediate manufacturer that the statements contained in the addendum are accurate as of the date of manufacture by the intermediate manufacturer and can be used and relied on by any subsequent intermediate manufacturer(s) and the final-stage manufacturer as a basis for certification.
-----Original Message----- 

From: Camacho, Alvaro [mailto:acamacho@ucsd.edu] 

Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 2:23 PM 

To: EBSA, E-OHPSCA - EBSA 

Subject: MHPAEA - Wellstone/Dominici 

Hello, 

Practicing in a rural underserved predominantly Hispanic community close to 

the Mexico border, we find that the main constrain that our patients with 

comorbid psychiatric and substance abuse problem have is the lack of access 

and funding from MediCaid to recovery programs, therapeutical communities 

and long term residential rehabilitation programs. 

Here in California, they get wonderful coverage if they are on probation, 

since they are court mandated. 

The vast majority of our underserved population with addiction problems, 

without MediCaid coverage are left with almost no option for treatment, with 

the only remaining avenue being criminal behavior and continuous addictive 

behavior. 

Thank you 

A.Camacho, MD 

Medical Director, 

Imperial County Behavioral Health 

Assistant Clinical Professor of Psychiatry 

University of California, San Diego 

CONFIDENTIAL: This email message and attachments contain confidential and or 

proprietarial information that are intended only for use by the individual, 

or recipient(s) entity to whom it is addressed. This message may contain 

information that is privileged, confidential, and is exempt from disclosure 

under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you may not 

review, copy, or distribute this message. If you have received this 

communication in error, please notify us immediately by email or telephone 

and delete the original message. Thank you.
**Exhibit 24-19**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

**KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS** that I, **John W. Rogers, Jr.**do hereby appoint Frank M. Clark and Darryl M. Bradford,or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2007 of Commonwealth Edison Company, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present. 

**John W. Rogers, Jr.**

**DATE: February 6, 2008**
Marines, Brits turn over Helmand bases to Afghan forces
 By By Marine Corps 1st Lt. Skye Martin, Regional Command Southwest
  **HELMAND PROVINCE, Afghanistan, Oct. 27, 2014 –** U.S. Marines and service members from the United Kingdom left Regional Command Southwest in Afghanistan’s Helmand province today, turning their facilities over to the Afghan security forces. The lift-off followed a ceremony held at the former command post of Marine Expeditionary Brigade Afghanistan at Camp Leatherneck, signifying the transfer of Camps Bastion and Leatherneck to the control of the Afghan National Army’s 215th Corps. Regional Command Southwest is the first of the International Security Assistance Force commands to transfer authority to the Afghan national security forces as ISAF moves toward the Resolute Support mission that begins in 2015. During the past year, Bosnia, Estonia, Denmark, Georgia, Jordan and Tonga ended their operations in Regional Command Southwest. **‘A very, very tough area’** Army Gen. John F. Campbell, ISAF commander, acknowledged that Helmand has been a “very, very tough area,” and he expressed confidence in the Afghan forces. “We feel very confident with the Afghan security forces as they continue to grow in their capacity and they continue to work better between the police and the army," he said. Army Lt. Gen. Joseph Anderson, commander of ISAF Joint Command, echoed that confidence. "We lift off confident in the Afghans’ ability to secure the region,” he said. “The mission has been complex, difficult and dangerous. Everyone has made tremendous sacrifices, but those sacrifices have not been in vain." Marine Corps Brig. Gen. Daniel D. Yoo, commander of Marine Expeditionary Brigade Afghanistan, said today’s transfer is a sign of progress. “It's not about the coalition,” he said. “It is really about the Afghans and what they have achieved over the last 13 years. What they have done here is truly significant.” The Marines, sailors and British service members flew to Kandahar Airfield after the ceremony and will return home in the coming weeks.
Exhibit 32-6



Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code



The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Report on Form 10-K of PECO Energy Company for the year ended December 31, 2004,
that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of PECO Energy Company.



|                           |  |  |  |  |  |                          |  |                                                                               
|-------------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                           |  |  | 
|Date:    February 23, 2005 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    J. BARRY MITCHELL
|                           |  |  |  |  |  |                          |  | J. Barry Mitchell Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 24.18



POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, Richard L. Thomas do hereby appoint Frank M. Clark and J. Barry Mitchell, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on
my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2005 of Commonwealth Edison Company, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and
perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.





/s/ Richard L. ThomasRichard L. Thomas




DATE: February 11, 2006
EXHIBIT 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
of The CIT Group, Inc.:

      We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in Registration  Statements
No. 33-85224, No. 333-70249, No. 333-64539, No. 333-43323, No. 333-64529 and No.
333-63793  on Form S-3 of The CIT Group,  Inc. of our report  dated  January 28,
1999,  relating to the  consolidated  balance sheets of The CIT Group,  Inc. and
subsidiaries  as of  December  31, 1998 and 1997,  and the related  consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, which report appears
in the December 31, 1998 Annual Report on Form 10-K of The CIT Group, Inc.

                                                   KPMG LLP

Short Hills, New Jersey
March 16, 1999
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7624

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KEVIN STEVENS, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. (2:11-cr-00073-RBS-LRL-2; 2:21-

cv-00260-RBS)

Submitted: February 24, 2022 Decided: March 1, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Stevens, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Stevens, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion 

under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requesting reconsideration of the 

court’s order holding Stevens’ 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion in abeyance. This court may 

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and 

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan 

Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Stevens seeks to appeal is neither a final 

order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the 

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1244.html[7/22/2015 9:14:26 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jve-4b9j

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1244

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

I can manage my own retirement plans and I don't want or need any help or protection from the government to

 do so. Leave my retirement plan alone.
CRP1234 CRP1234Report

Bober,Katarzyna Katarzyna Katarzyna to: Karen Thundiyil 04/06/2009 11:03 AM

History: This message has been forwarded.

Karen,

I finally got the Gradient Report without the CBI watermarks. See attached. I think you got the CFD report 

from DuPont and the Exponent Report was clean. So please feel free now to release the CBI claims from

all three reports and use them as needed. 

Best regards,

Kasia
EXHIBIT
23.2
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
   We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-53367 and 333-106079 on Form S-3 of our reports dated February 28, 2008
(which express an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph
regarding the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Financial
Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset
Retirement Obligations in 2005 and Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Paymentand
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers' Accounting for Defined
Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an amendment of FASB Statements
No. 87, 88, 106, and 132Rin 2006, and Financial Accounting Standards
Board Financial Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes), relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial
statement schedule, and internal controls over financial reporting of Public
Service Company of New Mexico and subsidiary, appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Public Service Company of New Mexico and subsidiary for the year
ended December 31, 2007.
   
 /S/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
  Dallas,
Texas
 February
28, 2008
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 73 FR 33329, June 12, 2008.

§ 40.353 What principles govern the interaction between MROs and other service agents? As a service agent other than an MRO (*e.g.,* a C/TPA), the following principles govern your interaction with MROs: ( a ) You may provide MRO services to employers, directly or through contract, if you meet all applicable provisions of this part.
( b ) If you employ or contract for an MRO, the MRO must perform duties independently and confidentially. When you have a relationship with an MRO, you must structure the relationship to ensure that this independence and confidentiality are not compromised. Specific means (including both physical and operational measures, as appropriate) to separate MRO functions and other service agent functions are essential.
( c ) Only your staff who are actually under the day-to-day supervision and control of an MRO with respect to MRO functions may perform these functions. This does not mean that those staff may not perform other functions at other times. However, the designation of your staff to perform MRO functions under MRO supervision must be limited and not used as a subterfuge to circumvent confidentiality and other requirements of this part and DOT agency regulations. You must ensure that MRO staff operate under controls sufficient to ensure that the independence and confidentiality of the MRO process are not compromised.
( d ) Like other MROs, an MRO you employ or contract with must personally conduct verification interviews with employees and must personally make all verification decisions. Consequently, your staff cannot perform these functions.
Mr. and Mrs. Brian Wenzel
108 Oak Run Circle
Crawford Texas 76638

REFERENCE : Dept. of Labor Fiduciary Rule

Dear Sir:

My wife and I are both hard working Americans who want to insure our retirement dollars are
safe, Too many Texans are pressured into retirement funds and investments that do not fit their goals
and needs.

The Registered Representatives have tricked the SEC and the public long enough and need to be held
accountable.

PLEASE ! Protect Americans by making sure this Fiduciary Rule goes into effect as soon as possible.

Sincerely,

Ball

Mr. and Mrs. Brian Wenzel
Crawford TX
§ 551.46 Who must comply with this subpart and when? ( a ) All foreign manufacturers, assemblers, and importers of motor vehicles or motor vehicle equipment (hereinafter referred to as “foreign manufacturers”) must comply with this subpart before offering a motor vehicle or item of motor vehicle equipment for importation into the United States.
( b ) Unless and until a foreign manufacturer appoints an agent in accordance with the requirements of this subpart, it may not import motor vehicles or motor vehicle equipment into the United States.
§ 526.3 Transfer of vehicle from non-domestic to domestic fleet. Each plan submitted under section 503(b)(4) of the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act must contain the following information: ( a ) For each model year for which relief is sought in the plan and for each model type of automobile sought to be included by the submitter in its domestic fleet under the plan (i.e., those with at least 50 percent but less than 75 percent U.S. or Canadian value added), provide the following information: ( 1 ) A description of the model type, including engine type and displacement, transmission class, car line designation, and fuel economy;
( 2 ) The projected U.S. sales of the model type;
( 3 ) The average total manufacturing cost per vehicle for the model type;
( 4 ) The percentage of the cost to the manufacturer attributable to value added in the United States or Canada for the model type:
( b ) For each year covered by the plan, a list of individual product actions (e.g., change from imported engine to domestically manufactured engine) which will increase the domestic content of the affected vehicles. For each action, provide the model year in which the action will take effect, a description of the nature of the action, and the percentage change in domestic content resulting from the action.
[47 FR 7248, Feb. 18, 1982, as amended at 59 FR 25576, May 17, 1994]
Exhibit 24.5



POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, Nelson A. Diaz do hereby appoint John W. Rowe and Randall E. Mehrberg, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my
behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2005 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all
things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.





/s/ Nelson A. DiazNelson A. Diaz




DATE: February 10, 2006