alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 511.48 Official docket. ( a ) The official docket in adjudicatory proceedings will be maintained in the Docket Section, Office of the Secretary, Room 4107, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20590, and will be available for inspection during normal working hours (9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.) Monday through Friday.
( b ) Fees for production or disclosure of records contained in the official docket shall be levied as prescribed in the Department of Transportation's regulations on Public Availability of Information (49 CFR part 7).
[53 FR 15783, May 3, 1988]
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer
of CNA Financial Corporation
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
(As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  
    
    the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed on
the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: March 8, 2006/s/ Stephen W. LilienthalStephen W. LilienthalChief Executive Officer
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

( Pro Se )

MINDY L. FOGEL

,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

,

Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 20

- 980C (Filed: August 18, 2020 )

ORDER

The pro se plaintiff, Mindy L

. Fogel, brought this action to challenge the Social Security Administration’s ( “ SSA ” ) denial of her application for disability benefits. Compl . at 2 , ECF No. 1. She alleges that the denial was unfair because medical records that suppo rted her claim were not added to the record, and because her attorney nonetheless persuaded her to go ahead with the hearing on her claim. Id. She seeks an opportunity to prove that she is disabled and unable to work, and requests that the Court “[o]vertur n the [ j ] udgment and final [o]rder of [d]ismissal” and award her $84,000 in past due benefits. Id. at 3. 1

Jurisdiction is a threshold matter, Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env ’ t

, 523 U.S. 83,

94

– 95 (1998), and the Court may raise the issue on its own at any time without a motion from a

party

, Folden v. United States

, 379 F.3d 1344, 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2004). Further, while it is well established that complaints filed by pro se plaintiffs are held to “less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers,” Haines v. Kerner , 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972), even pro se plaintiffs must persuade the Court that jurisdictional requirements have been met, Harris v.

United States , 113 Fed. Cl. 290, 292 (2013).

This Court does not have jurisdiction over claims alleging the wrongful denial of social security benefits. Marcus v. United States , 909 F.2d 1470, 1471 (Fed. Cir. 1990). To the contrary, the Social Security Act confers jurisdiction over challenges to the final decisions of the

Commissioner of the SSA on the district courts. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Indeed, Ms. Fogel currently has a lawsuit pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon that appears to seek

1 Ms. Fogel has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this case. That motion is

GRANTED.

### 2 review of the same denial of benefits that she has challenged in this case. See Fogel v. Commissioner , No. 19

- 1545 (D. Or

. Sept

. 25, 2019).

For these reasons, the Court directs the Clerk to DISMISS Ms. Fogel’s complaint without prejudice based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Elaine D. Kaplan

ELAINE D. KAPLAN Judge
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/13/15 9:56 AM

Received: July 12, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jy0-9nr9

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0204

Definition of the Term Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2137

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-08831

Submitter Information

Name: Carolyn Bruns

Address: 

4000 Town Center, Suite 1300

Southfield, MI, 48114

Email: cebruns@ft.newyorklife.com

Phone: 248-357-8960

General Comment

Insurance agents selling either fixed or variable annuities already have very tight regulations to 

follow with their insurance companies and broker dealers. They do NOT need to have an 

additional layer of regulation. This would make it VERY difficult for the average working 

person to rollover a 401K or 403B into an annuity structured IRA or even mutual fund IRA. 

They do NOT need to pay fees, even though I am personally a Certified Financial Planner, and 

need to keep their insurance and financial business structured fairly simply so as to truly 

understand it.

Page 1 of 1

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006481b7cfdc&format=xml&show... 7/13/2015
1210-AB32-2-1307.html[7/26/2015 1:18:07 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvv-m4m9

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1802

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Grant Pearson

General Comment

Please do not create any new regulations for retirement. We Citizens of this republic want the liberty to manage

 our own retirement. Please keep your hands off our 401k and other savings and financial accounts.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000020469
<NAME> UNITED MAGAZINE COMPANY
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-02-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         755,338
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,932,762
<ALLOWANCES>                                    63,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,096,982
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,780,089
<PP&E>                                       1,171,312
<DEPRECIATION>                                 475,501
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,333,522
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,219,559
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,133,278
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,333,522
<SALES>                                     24,561,801
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,561,801
<CGS>                                       17,918,114
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,980,572
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               501,697
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             347,809
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,864,180
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,864,180
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,864,180
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .78
        

</TABLE>
## City ofShow Low ''Namedby the turn ofacard"

March 13, 2013

U.S. Department ofTransportation Office ofAviation Analysis Essential Air Service and Small Community Air Service Development Program 180 North 9th Street Show Low,AZ 85901 Telephone (928) 532-4000

Facsimile (928) 532-4009 www.showlowaz.gov

Subject: Essential Air Service Air Carrier Proposals for Show Low, Arizona Dear Sirs: Thank you for allowing the City ofShow Low the opportunity to provide comments on your selection ofan air carrierto provide essential air service to Show Low Regional Airport. City staffconducted an evaluation ofthe proposals submitted by Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd., SeaPortAirlines, Inc., and Sovereign Air Inc. for a newtwo-yearterm beginning May 1, 2013. Great Lakes Aviation has been the carrier operating under an essential air service contract in Show Lowsince 2005. Given their presence as' Show Low's current carrier, ourgood working relationship, the inter-airline agreements they already have in place, and the convenience ofhaving Transportation Security Administration screenings in Show Low, it is our recommendation to remain with Great Lakes Aviation. Should you have any questions about our staff's recommendations, please contact our city manager, Ed Muder, at (928) 532-4015 orvia e-mail at emuder@showlowaz.gov or our airport manager, Glen Boyd, at (928) 532-4192 or gboyd@showlowaz.gov.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393, as amended by Section 5401 of Public Law 110-28, the U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act of 2007) the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest's Madison-Beaverhead Resource Advisory Committee will meet on Wednesday, September 19, 2007, from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m., in Dillon, Montana, for a business meeting. The meeting is open to the public.

# DATES:

Wednesday, September 19, 2007.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the USDA Service Center, 420 Barrett Street, Dillon, Montana.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bruce Ramsey, Designated Forest Official (DFO), Forest Supervisor, Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest, at (406) 683-3973. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda topics for this meeting include making decisions on projects to fund under Title II of Public Law 106-393, and other business. If the meeting location changes, notice will be posted in local newspapers, including the Dillon Tribune and The Montana Standard.

Dated: August 28, 2007.

Bruce Ramsey,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 07-4305 Filed 8-31-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Board of Directors 2006 Compensation Policy



 Exhibit 10.8.8 
 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF CHICAGO 
 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2006 COMPENSATION POLICY 
 GENERAL 
 The Board
of Directors of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago (“Bank”) hereby adopts this directors’ compensation policy for 2006 (“Policy”). 
 COMPENSATION POLICY METHODOLOGY 
 The goal of the Policy is to appropriately compensate the Directors for actual attendance and participation at the meetings of the Board of Directors and the committees of the Board and also for work performed on
behalf of the Board of Directors and the Bank apart from such meetings. Under this policy, compensation consists of per-meeting fees. The fees are intended to compensate Directors for: (1) their time spent reviewing the material sent to them on
a periodic basis by the Bank; (2) making themselves available and participating in any necessary telephonic meetings and for chairing meetings; (3) actual time spent attending the meetings; and (4) fulfilling the responsibility of
directors. 
 PAYMENT AND FEE STRUCTURE 
 Each Director, other than the Chairman and the Vice Chairman, will receive (i) $2,700 for each day spent in attendance at one or more meetings of the Board or its committees; or (ii) in the case of a
Director who chairs one or more Committee meetings, $2,900 for each day chairing such Committee. 
 The Chairman of the Board of Directors
will receive $4,300 for each day spent in attendance presiding at one or more meetings of the Board of Directors or the Executive Committee and for each day spent attending other committee meetings. 
 The Vice Chairman will receive $3,500 for each day spent in attendance at one or more meetings of the Board or its committees. 
 Meeting fees of $1,500 per day will also be paid to Directors for their participation in any other special meetings or events (where no other fee or
compensation is paid to such Director) on behalf of the Board of Directors and the Bank at the request of the Federal Housing Finance Board or at other events approved by the Board of Directors. 







 COMPLIANCE WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS 
 In no event shall any Director be paid amounts which would exceed the annual limitations on compensation set forth in Section 7(i) of the Federal
Home Loan Bank Act (12 U.S.C. §1427(i)), as amended by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, and as adjusted by the Federal Housing Finance Board pursuant to 12 C.F.R. §918.3. 
 EXPENSES 
 Each
Director will be reimbursed for necessary and reasonable travel, subsistence and other related expenses incurred in connection with the performance of their official duties (including telephonic meetings or meetings called at the request of the
Federal Housing Finance Board or other FHLB System body) as are payable to senior officers of the Bank under the Bank’s Travel Policy. 
  

	
	 APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

	 Dated: December 13, 2005

	
	 /s/ Peter E. Gutzmer

	 Corporate Secretary


  

 – 2 –
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000708282
<NAME> BIOSENSOR CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                              82
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      574
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        341
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,025
<PP&E>                                              59
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,092
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              555
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           141
<OTHER-SE>                                         396
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,092
<SALES>                                          1,924
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,924
<CGS>                                              924
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      981
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   324
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (305)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         3
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (308)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (308)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

87) ll-K- (B) -75 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:51 AM Sheet 87 of 325 
P.2 

-27 

II-K-(B)-75 

LIST OF IFCAM'S CRITICAL POINTS FOR MODEL VALIDATION. 

Letter from T. Hogan, EEA to R. Short, EPA:SASD. 

June 29, 1981. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(B)-75
#### In the Matter of Will of Timothy Clark, *Deceased.*

— Decree of surrogate reversed and the question whether the execution of the will was procured by undue influence ordered to be tried by a jury at a Circuit Court in the county of Genesee. The costs of this appeal to abide the event of a new trial. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.
From: cheider99@outlook.com [mailto:cheider99@outlook.com] 

Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2015 12:42 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

Hello,

I am writing to express my opposition to the part of this proposed rule change that would 

prohibit use of options in IRA accounts. I use covered calls and cash secured puts successfully 

in my IRA accounts to increase income and, in some cases, to offset losses. I have studied and 

understand the risks associated with these tactics and do not need government to dictate how I 

should manage my investments.

Thank you,

Charles Heider
From: Pat Jostrand [mailto:pjostrand@ctainc.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 6:27 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: "Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule"

Dear Friends at DOL,

I am writing in opposition to the proposed “Definition of Fiduciary Proposed Rule”, that would

define those valuation companies providing valuation services (to private companies) would

therefore become a fiduciary to the company they are valuing.

I think it is important that the valuation company maintains its status as an independent third

party and passage of this proposal would jeopardize that status.  We believe that the DOL can

pursue other avenues to address any issues that this proposal was designed for.   

Employee ownership in our company has been a great thing! We take pride as employee‐

owners, in the contribution that our ESOP is making to employee retirement savings and to our

community by providing jobs.

Thank you,

Pat Jostrand 

CFO 

CTA, Inc. 

An Employee-Owned Company 

1625 Larkin Williams Rd. 

Fenton, MO 63026 

Phone 636-305-3105 

Fax 636-305-3196 

pjostrand@ctainc.com "The Mission of CTA is to glorify God by providing purposeful products that lift up and encourage the body of Christ."
#### § 554.2 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to inform interested persons of the procedures followed by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in order more fairly and effectively to implement 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301.

[60 FR 17267, Apr. 5, 1995]
#### Emma Cohn, Respondent, *v.*Catskill Mountain Railway Company, Appellant.

*Cohn v. Catskill Mountain Ry. Co.,*135 App. Div. 920, affirmed

(Argued May 9, 1911;

decided May 30, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 5,1910, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant.

*Frank H. Osborn*for appellant.

*Herman Gottlieb*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Chase and Collin, JJ. Absent: Hiscock, J.
Exhibit 24.5



POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, Nelson A. Diaz do hereby appoint John W. Rowe and Randall E. Mehrberg, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and
on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2006 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all
things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.



/s/ Nelson A. DiazNelson A. Diaz




DATE: February 5, 2007
|  | Cooling Water Intake Structures - CWA §316(b)             Recent                     Additions | Contact                     Us |                     Print                     Version                     Search:                     EPA                     Home > Water                     > Water Science > Industrial                     Water Pollution Controls > Cooling                     Water Intake Structures 316(b) > Phase                     II > Technical Development Document for Proposed rule |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

||
||