alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 397
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 397 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 397.5 Attendance and surveillance of motor vehicles. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a motor vehicle which contains a Division 1.1, 1.2, or 1.3 (explosive) material must be attended at all times by its driver or a qualified representative of the motor carrier that operates it.
( b ) The rules in paragraph (a) of this section do not apply to a motor vehicle which contains Division 1.1, 1.2, or 1.3 material if all the following conditions exist— ( 1 ) The vehicle is located on the property of a motor carrier, on the property of a shipper or consignee of the explosives, in a safe haven, or, in the case of a vehicle containing 50 pounds or less of a Division 1.1, 1.2, or 1.3 material, on a construction or survey site; and
( 2 ) The lawful bailee of the explosives is aware of the nature of the explosives the vehicle contains and has been instructed in the procedures which must be followed in emergencies; and
( 3 ) The vehicle is within the bailee's unobstructed field of view or is located in a safe haven.
( c ) A motor vehicle which contains hazardous materials other than Division 1.1, 1.2, or 1.3, materials, and which is located on a public street or highway, or the shoulder of a public highway, must be attended by its driver. However, the vehicle need not be attended while its driver is performing duties which are incident and necessary to the driver's duties as the operator of the vehicle.
( d ) For purposes of this section— ( 1 ) A motor vehicle is attended when the person in charge of the vehicle is on the vehicle, awake, and not in a sleeper berth, or is within 100 feet of the vehicle and has it within his/her unobstructed field of view.
( 2 ) A qualified representative of a motor carrier is a person who— ( i ) Has been designated by the carrier to attend the vehicle;
( ii ) Is aware of the nature of the hazardous materials contained in the vehicle he/she attends;
( iii ) Has been instructed in the procedures he/she must follow in emergencies; and
( iv ) Is authorized to move the vehicle and has the means and ability to do so.
( 3 ) A safe haven is an area specifically approved in writing by local, State, or Federal governmental authorities for the parking of unattended vehicles containing Division 1.1, 1.2, or 1.3 materials.
( e ) The rules in this section do not relieve the driver from any obligation imposed by law relating to the placing of warning devices when a motor vehicle is stopped on a public street or highway.
[59 FR 63925, Dec. 12, 1994, as amended at 77 FR 59828, Oct. 1, 2012]
§ 557.5 Improperly filed petitions. ( a ) A petition that is not addressed as specified in § 557.4, but that meets the other requirements of that section, will be treated as a properly filed petition, received as of the time it is discovered and identified.
( b ) A document that fails to conform to one or more of the requirements of § 557.4(a) ( 1 ) through ( 5 ) will not be treated as a petition under this part. Such a document will be treated according to the existing correspondence and other procedures of the NHTSA, and any information contained in it will be considered at the discretion of the Administrator.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-4412

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHICOBE ANTRELL WILLIAMS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Greenville. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (4:17-cr-00022-D-1)

Submitted: April 30, 2019 Decided: May 16, 2019

Before MOTZ, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

R. Clarke Speaks, Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellant. Robert J. Higdon, Jr., 

United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney,

Banumathi Rangarajan, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED 

STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Chicobe Antrell Williams was sentenced to 151 months’ imprisonment after 

pleading guilty to distribution of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 

(b)(1)(C) (2012). At sentencing, the district court determined that Williams’ two prior 

North Carolina convictions for conspiracy to sell cocaine were the predicate controlled 

substance offenses necessary to support a career offender enhancement under U.S. 

Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4B1.1(a) (2016). On appeal, Williams argues that his 

trial counsel was ineffective for failing to argue that the categorical approach applied to 

his North Carolina drug conspiracy convictions pursuant to this Court’s decision in 

United States v. McCollum, 885 F.3d 300 (4th Cir. 2018). Williams argues that under the 

categorical approach, his drug conspiracy convictions were not predicate controlled 

substance offenses because they did not require an overt act. 

Claims of ineffective assistance generally are not cognizable on direct appeal. 

United States v. Maynes, 880 F.3d 110, 113 n.1 (4th Cir. 2018). “Unless an attorney’s 

ineffectiveness conclusively appears on the face of the record, . . . [such] claim[s] should 

be raised, if at all, in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion.” United States v. Faulls, 821 F.3d 502, 

508 (4th Cir. 2016); Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1987) (providing 

standard). Collateral review proceedings—rather than direct appeal—allow the parties to 

develop the record for ineffective assistance claims, focusing on facts related to the 

Strickland test, giving counsel an opportunity to explain the reasons for his action or 

inaction, and allowing the district court to consider the claims in the first instance. 

Massaro v. United States, 538 U.S. 500, 504-06 (2003).
3

It does not conclusively appear on the face of the record that Williams can satisfy 

the Strickland test. Accordingly, we decline to address the ineffective assistance claim 

on direct appeal and dismiss Williams’ appeal of his sentence. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
###### Editorial Note on Part 393

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 393 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

#### § 393.85 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Princeton National Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary Consolidated Balance Sheets and
Statements of Income and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         $12,663
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                        $344,898
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                $2,600
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    $0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   $109,299
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         $13,444
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           $13,714
<LOANS>                                       $285,005
<ALLOWANCE>                                     $1,925
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                $451,152
<DEPOSITS>                                    $380,715
<SHORT-TERM>                                   $21,341
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             $4,738
<LONG-TERM>                                       $500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               $0
<PREFERRED>                                         $0
<COMMON>                                       $20,700
<OTHER-SE>                                     $23,158
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                $451,152
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                $18,681
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               $5,446
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  $236
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               $24,383
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             $11,456
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             $12,329
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          $12,034
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     $262
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 $21
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                $10,294
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 $4,296
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      $4,296
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     $0
<CHANGES>                                           $0
<NET-INCOME>                                    $3,219
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.81
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.11
<LOANS-NON>                                     $1,124
<LOANS-PAST>                                       $33
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    $0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   $200
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                $1,925
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     $709
<RECOVERIES>                                      $542
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               $1,925
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            $1,925
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 $0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             $0
        

</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFabrication of lightweight Si/SiC LIDAR mirrorsA new, chemical vapor deposition (CVD) process was developed for fabricating lightweight, polycrystalline silicon/silicon-carbide (Si/SiC) mirrors. The process involves three CVD steps: (1) to produce the mirror faceplate; (2) to form the lightweight backstructure, which is deposited integral to the faceplate; and (3) to deposit a layer of optical-grade material, e.g., Si, onto the front surface of the faceplate. The mirror figure and finish are fabricated into the faceplate.Document ID19910020621Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsGoela, Jitendra S.*(CVD, Inc. Woburn, MA, United States)*Taylor, Raymond L.*(CVD, Inc. Woburn, MA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1991Subject CategoryOpticsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-4389CVD-TR-9081NAS 1.26:4389Accession Number91N29935Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-18476PROJECT: RTOP 992-35-15-06CONTRACT_GRANT: SBIR-08.08-9243Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910020621.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
From: Bob Wood [mailto:bwood82@tampabay.rr.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 5:49 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

Are you people out of your minds?! 

 

If you want to see a nice, disorderly rout of the stock market as people cash these things out to 

keep your corrupt hands off them, go right ahead. Talk about flouting property rights. Our savings 

too?!

 

Not on your life.

 

Bob Wood

Clearwater, FL
# NATO SECRETARY GENERAL AND US DEFENSE SECRETARY REAFFIRM AFGHAN COMMITTMENT

/ Published Sept. 28, 2017

**NEWS RELEASE**

**2017-09-28-01**

****

**KABUL, Afghanistan, September 28, 2017**– NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg visited Afghanistan along with U.S. Secretary of Defense, James Mattis. While here they met with high level Afghan officials and Resolute Support troops across Afghanistan.

Stoltenberg and Mattis pledged continued support for Afghanistan and vowed to not allow the country to once again become a safe haven for international terrorists. During a visit with President Ghani in Kabul, the two secretaries reaffirmed their partnership and pledge to an Afghan led-reconciliation effort to bring the conflict to an end.

Speaking directly to the Taliban, Stoltenberg said the group cannot win on the battlefield and encouraged them to come to the negotiating table. “NATO doesn’t quit when the going gets tough. We keep our promises. That is why I very much welcome that many nations have pledged further contributions,” he said. Secretary Mattis reinforced Secretary General Stoltenberg’s comments, “the sooner the Taliban recognizes they cannot win with bombs, the sooner the killing will end. The only path to peace and political legitimacy for them is through a negotiated settlement,” said Mattis. 

"This was a very important and successful visit," said General John Nicholson, Resolute Support Commander. “The Secretary General and Secretary Mattis reaffirmed our commitment to our Afghan partners and thanked our soldiers for their sacrifice and service to make all our homelands safer from the scourge of terrorism."

-30-
1210-AB32-2-1510.html[7/26/2015 6:22:17 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwl-ydqf

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2006

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: kevin atkinson

General Comment

I do not need help from the U.S Government managing my retirement accounts. Any attempts will be vigorously

 contested by myself and millions of Americans who know from experience that the government has caused

 nothing but financial hardship .
Preparing Now for Long-Term Care 

Editorial By Nathan Stinson, Jr., PhD, MD, MPH


Closing the Gap, Growing Older • May 2000


I

n February 2000, the U.S. Administration on Aging (AoA) released results 

of focus groups that examined American women’s planning and attitudes 

when it comes to long-term care. The focus groups zeroed in on women 

because women make up 60 percent of the nearly 35 million Americans aged 

65 and over, and approximately 75 percent of current caregivers. 

Many focus group respondents were anxious about the emotional aspect 

of receiving care. “I would find it totally frustrating,” says one African American 

woman. “Not being able to do for myself and get about...the idea of losing 

independence, I think that’s one of the hardest things.” 

A common thread throughout the focus group was the need for information that will help seniors and caregivers make smart decisions and plans for their 

future. Most respondents reported wanting to remain in their homes as long as 

possible as they grow older. But most were not fully aware of services that would 

help them stay at home, such as Meals on Wheels and adult day care. 

Results also showed a need for more intensive outreach to communities of 

color and other historically underserved communities. In some minority groups, 

such as Asian Americans, Hispanics, and American Indians, conflicts among 

family members about long-term care decision-making included the extended 

family. 

Across racial and ethnic lines, most focus-group participants had not made 

any concrete plans for their long-term care needs. Baby boomers (ages 40-55) 

were less aware about long-term care insurance than seniors (ages 65 and older). 

The small number of people who did purchase a policy were motivated because 

they had seen other family members suffer financially. As one Asian American 

senior said, “I saw my mother’s meager savings go down the drain. So I wanted 

to protect mine.” Senior Hispanics and American Indians tended to put their 

“trust in faith” that everything will work out. 

We have to show racial and ethnic minorities that they should still plan for 

their future. Without planning, families are more likely to face physical and 

emotional strain, especially residents of rural areas and Indian reservations. 

Keep your communities informed about policy efforts that can help support seniors and their caregivers, and let’s work together to increase education 

about AoA’s Eldercare Locator (1-800-677-1116). The toll-free line is a link to 

a network of state aging agencies, local agencies on aging, and Indian tribal 

organizations, and is dedicated to identifying resources for older people. Help us 

spread the word that preparing for our future can’t wait.

Office of Minority Health Resource Center U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
# CJTF-OIR partner kills ISIS Leader in Salah ad Din

/ Published Nov. 26, 2018

November 26, 2018

Release # 20181126-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 

**BAGHDAD, Iraq** – Combined Joint Task Force - Operation Inherent Resolve’s partner, the Iraqi Security Forces eliminated an ISIS fighter and senior leader known as “Katkut,” during an operation on Nov. 21, in Salah ad Din province, Iraq.

The Salah ad Din Operations Command dispatched forces to pursue and capture ISIS militants which had recently conducted a rocket attack. The ISF killed Katkut as he was fleeing from the scene. 

Katkut previously operated out of Al Hadr, an area southwest of Mosul. He also led an ISIS mortar detachment. His attacks resulted in the deaths and injuries of Iraqi civilians and security forces; they also induced damage and destruction to infrastructure within Salah ad Din and Ninewah provinces.

"The removal ofKatkut disrupts ISIS’s leadership chain and reduces their ability to conduct terrorist attacks both within the region and abroad," said Brig. Gen. David Doyle, CJTF-OIR director of operations.

CJTF-OIR works by, with and through partner forces in designated areas of Iraq and Syria to achieve the enduring defeat of ISIS and sets conditions for follow-on operations to increase regional security. 

#DefeatISIS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc. ((PNBC() on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the (Report(), I Todd D. Fanning, Senior Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer of PNBC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of PNBC.


| | /s/   Todd D. Fanning                                                     
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Todd D. Fanning
Senior Vice-President & Chief Financial OfficerMay 7, 2007

---
Exhibit 99.6

Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code

The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Report on Form 10-K of PECO Energy Company for the year ended December 31, 2002,
that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PECO Energy Company.

|Date: March 21, 2003 |  | /s/PAMELA B. STROBELPamela B. Strobel
Chair
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
1210-AB32-2-1493.html[7/26/2015 6:09:00 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwj-x68i

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1989

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Please leave 401k's and IRA's alone . The American people are smart enough to decide how they want to use

 their retirements. The government should stay

The government should stay out of it. Thanks.
#### § 568.3 Definitions.

All terms that are defined in the Act and the rules and standards issued under its authority are used as defined therein. The term “bumper” has the meaning assigned to it in Title I of the Cost Savings Act and the rules and standards issued under its authority. The definitions contained in 49 CFR part 567 apply to this part.
[Crim. No. 3474.

Second Dist., Div. Two.

Sept. 24, 1941.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. RUTH HOGUE, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellant.

Earl Warren, Attorney General, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

May 22, 1941, the transcripts on appeal were filed in this court. Thereafter, the time for filing briefs having elapsed, an order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed was issued, returnable September 24, 1941. On the latter date there was no appearance on behalf of appellant, either by brief or otherwise.

*875Therefore, pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code, the judgment of the trial court hereby is affirmed.
Editorial Note on Part 381
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 381 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 381.215 What will the FMCSA do after the agency receives my request for a waiver? ( a ) The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration will review your request and make a recommendation to the Administrator. The final decision whether to grant or deny the application for a waiver will be made by the Administrator.
( b ) After a decision is signed by the Administrator, you will be sent a copy of the document, which will include the terms and conditions for the waiver or the reason for denying the application for a waiver.