alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                         SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                     8,257
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                    69,048
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                           6,800
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>               17,538
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                    25,163
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                      25,192
<LOANS>                                   69,362
<ALLOWANCE>                                1,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           111,830
<DEPOSITS>                                99,106
<SHORT-TERM>                               1,732
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          810
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<COMMON>                                   3,662
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           111,830
<INTEREST-LOAN>                            5,327
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            884
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             199
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           6,140
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                         2,060
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         2,133
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                      4,277
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                 52
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                            3,767
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            1,237
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                 780
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.62
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                              6.05
<LOANS-NON>                                  464
<LOANS-PAST>                                 168
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             971
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                 25
<RECOVERIES>                                   2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                           1000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                        1000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      353
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
          PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report, as amended, of Union
Bankshares, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
[SECTION] 1350, as adopted pursuant to [SECTION] 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that based on their knowledge and belief: 1) the Report, as
amended, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the
Report, as amended, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
covered in the Report, as amended.


                                       /s/ Kenneth D. Gibbons
                                       ----------------------
                                       Kenneth D. Gibbons
                                       Chief Executive Officer


                                       /s/ Marsha A. Mongeon
                                       ----------------------
                                       Marsha A. Mongeon
                                       Chief Financial Officer


                                       August 19, 2002
                                       ---------------
From: Scott Woods [mailto:mozart9187@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2015 6:19 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB32

I am a retired 78 year old investor who manages his own securities portfolios including a selfdirected IRA. I am opposed to banning the sale of covered call options in IRAs. I have no 

opinion with respect to the use of other stock option transactions in IRAs.

Scott A. Woods

1644 Wonderstone Drive

St. George, UT 84790

Telephone: 435-673-7270

Email: mozart9187@gmail.com
Editorial Note on Part 395
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 395 appear at 66 FR 49874, Oct. 1, 2001.

§ 395.30 ELD record submissions, edits, annotations, and data retention. ( a ) *Accurate record keeping.* A driver and the motor carrier must ensure that the driver's ELD records are accurate.
( b ) *Review of records and certification by driver.* ( 1 ) A driver must review the driver's ELD records, edit and correct inaccurate records, enter any missing information, and certify the accuracy of the information.
( 2 ) Using the certification function of the ELD, the driver must certify the driver's records by affirmatively selecting “Agree” immediately following a statement that reads, “I hereby certify that my data entries and my record of duty status for this 24-hour period are true and correct.” The driver must certify the record immediately after the final required entry has been made or corrected for the 24-hour period.
( 3 ) The driver must submit the driver's certified ELD records to the motor carrier in accordance with § 395.8(a)(2).
( 4 ) If any edits are necessary after the driver submits the records to the motor carrier, the driver must recertify the record after the edits are made.
( c ) *Edits, entries, and annotations.* ( 1 ) Subject to the edit limitations of an ELD, a driver may edit, enter missing information, and annotate ELD recorded events. When edits, additions, or annotations are necessary, a driver must use the ELD and respond to the ELD's prompts.
( 2 ) The driver or support personnel must annotate each change or addition to a record.
( 3 ) In the case of team drivers, if there were a mistake resulting in the wrong driver being assigned driving-time hours by the ELD, and if the team drivers were both indicated in each other's records for that period as co-drivers, driving time may be edited and reassigned between the team drivers following the procedure supported by the ELD.
( d ) *Motor carrier-proposed edits.* ( 1 ) On review of a driver's submitted records, the motor carrier may request edits to a driver's records of duty status to ensure accuracy. A driver must confirm or reject any proposed change, implement the appropriate edits on the driver's record of duty status, and recertify and resubmit the records in order for any motor carrier-proposed changes to take effect.
( 2 ) A motor carrier may not request edits to the driver's electronic records before the records have been submitted by the driver.
( 3 ) Edits requested by any system or by any person other than the driver must require the driver's electronic confirmation or rejection.
( e ) *Coercion prohibited.* A motor carrier may not coerce a driver to make a false certification of the driver's data entries or record of duty status.
( f ) *Motor carrier data retention requirements.* A motor carrier must not alter or erase, or permit or require alteration or erasure of, the original information collected concerning the driver's hours of service, the source data streams used to provide that information, or information contained in any ELD that uses the original information and HOS source data.
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   February 27, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Thomas G. Sategna                          |
|------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                     |   | Thomas G. Sategna                                                                                                                                                           |
|                                     |   | Vice President, Controller                                                                                                                                                  |
|                                     |   | Texas-New Mexico Power Company                                                                                                                                              |

----
1210-AB32-2-1533.html[7/26/2015 7:10:21 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 10, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jwq-qqjs

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2030

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Stacy Moinat

General Comment

Leave my retirement alone. Government has no business in private sectors.
**Exhibit 24-26**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

**KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS** that I, **Ronald Rubin**do hereby appoint John W. Rowe and Paul Bonney, or either ofthem, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2007 of PECO Energy Company, together with any amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present. 

**Ronald Rubin**

**DATE: February 1, 2008**
1210-AB32-2-1336.html[7/26/2015 1:50:02 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvx-xxna

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1832

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Eileen Corcoran

General Comment

Regarding any thought on the part of government to assume control/management of my hard earned retirement

 savings acct, I would only say that I would trust my 8 year-old granddaughter to manage my money before I

 would ever consider "asking" (if this is what you would call your attempted "take over") the government to

 handle my finances. Government has a proven track record of FAILING to be fiscally responsible. Only a fool

 would trust government is trying to give us a better deal than we, individually, have managed to do. Keep your

 hands off my retirement account!
PUBLIC LAW 109–142—DEC. 22, 2005 119 STAT. 2657

Public Law 109–142

109th Congress

Joint Resolution

Recognizing Commodore John Barry as the first flag officer of the United States

Navy.

Whereas John Barry, American merchant marine captain and

native of County Wexford, Ireland, volunteered his services to

the Continental Navy during the American War for Independence

and was assigned by the Continental Congress as captain of

the Lexington, taking command of that vessel on March 14,

1776, and later participating in the victorious Trenton campaign;

Whereas the quality and effectiveness of Captain John Barry’s

service to the American war effort was recognized not only by

George Washington but also by the enemies of the new Nation;

Whereas Captain John Barry rejected British General Lord Howe’s

flattering offer to desert Washington and the patriot cause,

stating: ‘‘Not the value and command of the whole British fleet

can lure me from the cause of my country.’’;

Whereas Captain John Barry, while in command of the frigate

Alliance, successfully transported French gold to America to help

finance the American War for Independence and also won

numerous victories at sea;

Whereas when the First Congress, acting under the new Constitution of the United States, authorized the raising and construction

of the United States Navy, it was to Captain John Barry that

President George Washington turned to build and lead the new

Nation’s infant Navy, the successor to the Continental Navy

of the War for Independence;

Whereas Captain John Barry supervised the building of his flagship,

the U.S.S. United States;

Whereas on February 22, 1797, President Washington personally

conferred upon Captain John Barry, by and with the advice

and consent of the Senate, the rank of Captain, with ‘‘Commission

No. 1’’, United States Navy, dated June 7, 1794;

Whereas John Barry served as the senior officer of the United

States Navy, with the title of ‘‘Commodore’’ (in official correspondence), under Presidents Washington, John Adams, and Jefferson;

Whereas as commander of the first United States naval squadron

under the Constitution of the United States, which included the

U.S.S. Constitution (‘‘Old Ironsides’’), John Barry was a Commodore, with the right to fly a broad pendant, which made him

a flag officer; and

Dec. 22, 2005

[H.J. Res. 38]

119 STAT. 2658 PUBLIC LAW 109–142—DEC. 22, 2005

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 38:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):

Dec. 14, considered and passed House.

Dec. 16, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Whereas in this sense it can be said that Commodore John Barry

was the first flag officer of the United States Navy: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Commodore

John Barry is recognized, and is hereby honored, as the first flag

officer of the United States Navy.

Approved December 22, 2005.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 240

Returning to the Senate the bill H.R. 2500.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 20, 2001

Mr. THOMAS submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Returning to the Senate the bill H.R. 2500.

1 Resolved, That the amendment of the Senate to the

2 bill (H.R. 2500) entitled ‘‘An Act making appropriations

3 for the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the

4 Judiciary, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending

5 September 30, 2002, and for other purposes’’, in the opin6 ion of this House, contravenes the first clause of the sev7 enth section of the first article of the Constitution of the

8 United States and is an infringement of the privileges of

9 this House and that such bill be respectfully returned to

10 the Senate with a message communicating this resolution.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fisher Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q/A), I William W. Krippaehne Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: September 12, 2003



/s/    WILLIAM W. KRIPPAEHNE
JR.William W. Krippaehne Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer
From: Farrall, Lisa [mailto:lfarrall@harris.com] 

Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 12:35 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 

To whom it may concern: 

I do not want any changes made to my employer-sponsored 401K or 

my IRA's. Any distribution should be left to the person who 

contributed to the plan, not the Government.

Lisa Farrall 

farralld@bellsouth.net
###### Editorial Note on Part 572

#### Editorial Notes:

1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 572.181 General description.

(a) The ES-2re Side Impact Crash Test Dummy, 50th Percentile Adult Male, is defined by:

(1) The drawings and specifications contained in the “Parts List and Drawings, Part 572 Subpart U, Eurosid 2 with Rib Extensions (ES-2re, Alpha Version), September 2009,” (incorporated by reference, see § 572.180), which includes the technical drawings and specifications described in Drawing 175-0000, the titles of which are listed in Table A;

| Component assembly | Drawing No. |
| --- | --- |
| Head Assembly | 175-1000 |
| Neck Assembly Test/Cert | 175-2000 |
| Neck Bracket Including Lifting Eyebolt | 175-2500 |
| Shoulder Assembly | 175-3000 |
| Arm Assembly-Left | 175-3500 |
| Arm Assembly-Right | 175-3800 |
| Thorax Assembly with Rib Extensions | 175-4000 |
| Abdominal Assembly | 175-5000 |
| Lumbar Spine Assembly | 175-5500 |
| Pelvis Assembly | 175-6000 |
| Leg Assembly, Left | 175-7000-1 |
| Leg Assembly, Right | 175-7000-2 |
| Neoprene Body Suit | 175-8000 |

Table A

(2) “Parts/Drawings List, Part 572 Subpart U, Eurosid 2 with Rib Extensions (ES2re), September 2009,” containing 9 pages, incorporated by reference, see § 572.180,

(3) A listing of available transducers-crash test sensors for the ES-2re Crash Test Dummy is shown in drawing 175-0000 sheet 4 of 6, dated February 2008, incorporated by reference, see § 572.180,

(4) Procedures for Assembly, Disassembly and Inspection (PADI) of the ES-2re Side Impact Crash Test Dummy, February 2008, incorporated by reference, see § 572.180,

(5) Sign convention for signal outputs reference document SAE J1733 Information Report, titled “Sign Convention for Vehicle Crash Testing” dated December 1994, incorporated by reference, see § 572.180.

(b) Exterior dimensions of ES-2re test dummy are shown in drawing 175-0000 sheet 3 of 6, dated February 2008, incorporated by reference, see § 572.180.

(c) Weights of body segments (head, neck, upper and lower torso, arms and upper and lower segments) and the center of gravity location of the head are shown in drawing 175-0000 sheet 2 of 6, dated February 2008, incorporated by reference, see § 572.180.

(d) Adjacent segments are joined in a manner such that, except for contacts existing under static conditions, there is no additional contact between metallic elements of adjacent body segments throughout the range of motion.

(e) The structural properties of the dummy are such that the dummy conforms to this Subpart in every respect before use in any test similar to those in Standard No. 214, Side Impact Protection and Standard No. 201, Occupant Protection in Interior Impact.

[71 FR 75331, Dec. 14, 2006, as amended at 73 FR 33921, June 16, 2008; 76 FR 31866, June 2, 2011]
#### Martin J. Condon, Respondent, *v.*New Rochelle Water Company, Appellant.

*Condon*v. *New Rochelle Water Co.,*136 App. Div. 897, affirmed.

(Argued April 6, 1911;

decided April 25, 1911.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 7, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in ah action to restrain the defendant from charging plaintiff in excess of a certain rate for water or from interfering with plaintiff’s connections with its mains.

*John J. Crennan*and *Edwin T. Rice*for appellant.

*Henry Q. K. Heath*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Cray, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.