alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 572
Editorial Notes: 1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 572.101 General description. ( a ) The free motion headform consists of the component assembly which is shown in drawings 92041-001 (incorporated by reference; see § 572.100), 92041-002 (incorporated by reference; see § 572.100), 92041-003 (incorporated by reference; see § 572.100), 92041-004 (incorporated by reference; see § 572.100), 92041-005 (incorporated by reference; see § 572.100), 92041-006 (incorporated by reference; see § 572.100), 92041-008 (incorporated by reference; see § 572.100), 92041-009 (incorporated by reference; see § 572.100), 92041-011 (incorporated by reference; see § 572.100), 78051-148 (incorporated by reference; see § 572.100), 78051-228/78051-229 (incorporated by reference; see § 572.100), 78051-339 (incorporated by reference; see § 572.100), 78051-372 (incorporated by reference; see § 572.100), C-1797 (incorporated by reference; see § 572.100), and SA572-S4 (incorporated by reference; see § 572.100).
( b ) Disassembly, inspection, and assembly procedures, and sign convention for the signal outputs of the free motion headform accelerometers, are set forth in the Free-Motion Headform User's Manual (incorporated by reference; see § 572.100).
( c ) The structural properties of the headform are such that it conforms to this part in every respect both before and after being used in the test specified in Standard No. 201 of this chapter (§ 571.201).
( d ) The outputs of accelerometers installed in the headform are recorded in individual data channels that conform to the requirements of SAE Recommended Practice J211, OCT 1988, “Instrumentation for Impact Tests,” Class 1000 (incorporated by reference; see § 572.100).
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITEDS TATES OFA MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 01-4320



#  E ZEQUIELA NDAYA -D UARTE ; J AVIER S ANCHEZ -D UARTE , a/k/a Javier Duarte-Sanchez,

Defendants-Appellants. 

# 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-00-342) Submitted: December 21, 2001 Decided: January 24, 2002 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Benjamin D. Porter, MORROW, ALEXANDER, TASH, KURTZ & PORTER, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellants. Benjamin H. White, Jr., United States Attorney, Steven H. Levin, Assistant United States Attorney, Bradley Staley, Third Year Law Student, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION
PER CURIAM: Ezequiel Andaya-Duarte and Javier Sanchez-Duarte were charged with conspiracy to distribute cocaine hydrochloride and possession with intent to distribute cocaine hydrochloride. Andaya-Duarte was additionally charged with illegally re-entering the United States after deportation. After the district court denied their motion to suppress, Defendants pled guilty to the charges, reserving their right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress. Andaya-Duarte and Sanchez-Duarte were sentenced to a total of 148 months and 134 months imprisonment, respectively. On appeal, Defendants claim that their encounter with the police officers in the parking lot constituted a seizure for purposes of the Fourth Amendment that was unsupported by reasonable suspicion. They thus claim that the evidence found during the search of their property should have been suppressed as tainted fruit of the illegal seizure. This court reviews the factual findings underlying a motion to suppress for clear error, while reviewing the legal determinations de novo. United States v. Rusher , 966 F.2d 868, 873 (4th Cir. 1992). When a suppression motion has been denied, review of the evidence is made in the light most favorable to the government. United States v. Seidman , 156 F.3d 542, 547 (4th Cir. 1998). We have reviewed the briefs, the material submitted in the joint appendix, and the transcript of the district court’s hearing on the motion to suppress. We find that the district court properly concluded that even assuming Defendants’ encounter with the police constituteda seizure for purposes of the Fourth Amendment, the stop was supported by reasonable suspicion. See J.A. at 178-95. Hence, we find no error in the district court’s denial of the motion to suppress. Accordingly, we affirm Andaya-Duarte’s and Sanchez-Duarte’s convictions and sentences. We dispense with oral argument because 2 U NITED S TATES v. A NDAYA -D UARTEthe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3 U NITED S TATES v. A NDAYA -D UARTE
From: Lottie Rutherford [mailto:lottier@lclma.org] 

Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 10:27 AM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: auto deductions

I feel that if a person wants to save they will. Most cannot give up any more of their income at this 

point. Auto enrollments for all would be an administrative nightmare. We already have so much 

deducted from our paychecks, we need our cash in our hands.

Thank you

Lottie Rutherford

Office Manager

Lawyers Concerned for Lawyers, Inc.

31 Milk St., Ste. 810

Boston, MA 02109

617-482-9600

617-482-9909 Fax
#### § 236.201 Track-circuit control of signals.

The control circuits for home signal aspects with indications more favorable than “proceed at restricted speed” shall be controlled automatically by track circuits extending through the entire block.
PERRYVILLE
                ENERGY PARTNERS,
                L.L.C.
              EXHIBIT
                  23(d)
  Consent
        of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
  We
        hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
        on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-109506 and 333-55656) and Form S-8 (Nos. 33-10169,
        33-26726, 33-38362, 33-44663, 333-44364, 333-59692, 333-59696, 333-124716,
        and
        333-127496) of Cleco Corporation of our report dated April 2, 2007 relating
        to
        the financial statements of Perryville Energy Partners, L.L.C., which appears
        in
        this Form 10-K.
  
 
 
 
 /s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers
                  LLPNew
                  Orleans, LouisianaFebruary
                  27, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 177 (Thursday, September 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 52385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4493]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary


Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Interior, Office of the Secretary.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces an upcoming meeting of the Delaware & 
Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission. Notice of this meeting is 
required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463).
    Meeting Date and Time: Friday, September 14, 2007--1:30 p.m. to 4 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: Emrick Technology Center, 2750 Hugh Moore Park Road, Easton, 
PA 18042.
    The agenda for the meeting will focus on implementation of the 
Management Act Plan for the Delaware and Lehigh National Heritage 
Corridor and State Heritage Park. The Commission was established to 
assist the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and its political subdivisions 
in planning and implementing an integrated strategy for protecting and 
promoting cultural, historic and natural resources. The Commission 
reports to the Secretary of the Interior and to Congress.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage 
Corridor Commission was established by Public Law 100-692, November 18, 
1988 and extended through Public Law 105-355, November 13, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: C. Allen Sachse, Executive Director, 
Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission, 2750 Hugh 
Moore Park Road, Easton, PA 18042, (610) 923-3548.

    Dated: September 7, 2007.
C. Allen Sachse,
Executive Director, Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor 
Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-4493 Filed 9-12-07; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 6820-PE-M
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the
quarterly report of Alfacell Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kuslima Shogen, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge: 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of
 Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
The information contained in the Report fairly
 presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
 operations of the Company. Date: December 10, 2008 /s/ Kuslima ShogenName: Kuslima ShogenTitle:   Chief
 Executive Officer(Principal
 Executive Officer) A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Alfacell
Corporation and will be retained by Alfacell Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Shaping Afghanistan’s future police force
 By Staff Sgt. David Overson , 115th MPAD
  An Afghan Uniformed Police cadet stands watch at the Kabul Police Academy, Kabul, Afghanistan, while other cadets attend scheduled classes, Jan. 6, 2013. (Photo by Staff Sgt. David J. Overson)
 KABUL PROVINCE, Afghanistan — The Afghan Uniformed Police force continues to grow day-by-day with fresh, young, and idealistic cadets hitting the streets and protecting the civilian population of Afghanistan. However, first they must learn the in’s and out’s of being an AUP officer at police academies throughout Afghanistan. At the Kabul Police Academy, they have a course for noncommissioned officers that runs approximately six months and officer courses that last approximately four years. Afghan Ministry of Interior Affairs Deputy Ministry of Administration, Maj. Gen. Mahshooq Ahmad, said their primary goal is to graduate officers from the four year program, but many of the cadets want to become NCOs so they can start earning a paycheck much sooner. Cadets are provided room and board, health care and uniforms, but a very small stipend, which is not enough to support a family. Ahmad says that is one of their largest obstacles across Afghanistan to convince the cadets to stay in the full four year program. The requirements to become an AUP officer are similar to the requirements to join the U.S. military. The cadets need to be high school graduates, pass a drug and criminal background check, be physically fit and pass an entrance exam before they’re enrolled into the academy. According to Ahmad, there are 13 academies across Afghanistan, with approximately 12,000 cadets enrolled at any given time. Unfortunately though, another obstacle the academies face is recruiting female cadets. According to Ahmad, there are only about 250 female officers throughout Afghanistan, and this is one of their highest priorities in the future to improve upon. Ahmad said, “This is a big problem, the majority of Afghans do not want their daughters to go to a military college. Though in time, I think we can overcome this problem.” The general commander of the Kabul Police Academy, Prof. Gen. Sayed Noorullah Zal, has worked at the academy for 32 years and has seen a lot of changes and improvements during this time. “I love seeing my former students go on to become high ranking officials in Afghanistan, it is very rewarding,” said Zal.
Editorial Note on Part 572
Editorial Notes: 1. For compliance provisions relating to a vehicle's conformance with the performance requirements of Standard No. 208 (§ 571.208) relating to the part 572 test dummy, see the “Effective Date Note” at subpart E of this part. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 572 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 572.100 Incorporation by Reference. ( a ) The drawings and specifications referred to in § 572.101 are hereby incorporated in subpart L by reference. These materials are thereby made part of this regulation. The Director of the Federal Register approved the materials incorporated by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies of the materials may be inspected at NHTSA's Docket Section, 400 Seventh Street, S.W., room 5109, Washington, DC, or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( b ) The incorporated material is available as follows: ( 1 ) Drawing number 92041-001, “Head Form Assembly,” (November 30, 1992); drawing number 92041-002, “Skull Assembly,” (November 30, 1992); drawing number 92041-003, “Skull Cap Plate Assembly,” (November 30, 1992); drawing number 92041-004, “Skull Cap Plate,” (November 30, 1992); drawing number 92041-005, “Threaded Pin,” (November 30, 1992); drawing number 92041-006, “Hex Nut,” (November 30, 1992); drawing number 92041-008, “Head Skin without Nose,” (November 30, 1992, as amended March 6, 1995); drawing number 92041-009, “Six-Axis Load Cell Simulator Assembly,” (November 30, 1992); drawing number 92041-011, “Head Ballast Weight,” (November 30, 1992); drawing number 92041-018, “Head Form Bill of Materials,” (November 30, 1992); drawing number 78051-148, “Skull-Head (cast) Hybrid III,” (May 20, 1978, as amended August 17, 1978); drawing number 78051-228/78051-229, “Skin- Hybrid III,” (May 20, 1978, as amended through September 24, 1979); drawing number 78051-339, “Pivot Pin-Neck Transducer,” (May 20, 1978, as amended May 14, 1986); drawing number 78051-372, “Vinyl Skin Formulation Hybrid III,” (May 20, 1978); and drawing number C-1797, “Neck Blank, (August 1, 1989); drawing number SA572-S4, “Accelerometer Specification,” (November 30, 1992), are available from Reprographic Technologies, 1111 14th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20005.
( 2 ) A user's manual entitled “Free-Motion Headform User's Manual,” version 2, March 1995, is available from NHTSA's Docket Section at the address in paragraph (a) of this section.
( 3 ) SAE Recommended Practice J211, OCT 1988, “Instrumentation for Impact Tests,” Class 1000, is available from The Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1442.html[7/23/2015 11:00:36 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvo-cfhj

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1442

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Angela Rohrer

Address:

2711 Owl Creek Road

Frankfort, OH, 45628

Email: arohrer@wssrcpa.com

General Comment

I am smart enough to plan my own retirement. I am fed up with how much Obama and the government have

 been interfering with decisions that we should be making on our own without them. It is my money and I should

 be free to do with it what I choose to do.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellate case name: Julio Alvarado v. The State of Texas

Appellate case numbers: 01-13-00894-CR; 01-13-00895-CR

Trial court case number: 1325689; 1325690

Trial court: 232nd District Court of Harris County

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief concluding that the above-referenced 

appeals are frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967). 

Counsel has not, however, filed a motion to withdraw from representation.

If appointed counsel believes that an appeal is frivolous, counsel must request permission 

to withdraw. See id. An Anders brief must accompany a motion to withdraw; neither the brief nor 

the motion may be filed on its own. See id.; In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 406–08 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2008).

Accordingly, we order appellant’s appointed counsel to file with the Clerk of this Court

within 10 days of the date of this order a motion to withdraw that complies with Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure 6.5 and 9. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5, 9; Schulman, 252 S.W.3d at 410, 412.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 10, 2014
#### § 29.525 Does Indian preference apply to PSFAs under the Program?

To the greatest extent feasible, any contract, subcontract, grant, or sub-grant under a compact and funding agreement must give preference for employment and training, and the award of subcontracts and sub-grants, to Indians, Indian organizations, and Indian-owned economic enterprises, as defined in 25 U.S.C. 1452.
#### § 511.18 Joinder of proceedings.

Two or more matters which have been scheduled for adjudicative proceedings, and which involve one or more common questions of law or fact, may be consolidated for the purpose of hearing, appeal or the Administrator's review. A motion for consolidation for the purpose of hearing may be filed with the Presiding Officer by any party to such proceedings not later than thirty (30) days prior to the hearing. A motion for consolidation for the purpose of appeal may be filed by any party to such proceedings within 10 days after issuance of the Initial Decision. A motion to consolidate shall be served upon all parties to all proceedings whose joinder is contemplated. The proceedings may be consolidated where to do so would tend to avoid unnecessary costs or delay. Such consolidation may also be ordered upon the initiative of the Presiding Officer or the Administrator, as appropriate. The Presiding Officer may order separate hearings on any issue where to do so would promote economy or convenience or would avoid prejudice to a party.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 351 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 351

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 3022) to provide for 
         a program of temporary enhanced unemployment benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2002

Mr. Shows submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                           Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 3022) to provide for 
         a program of temporary enhanced unemployment benefits.

    Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this resolution the 
House shall without intervention of any point of order consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 3022) to provide for a program of temporary 
enhanced unemployment benefits. The bill shall be considered as read 
for amendment. An amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of 
the text of the Senate amendment to H.R. 3090 shall be considered as 
adopted. Points of order against provisions of the bill, as amended, 
are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion except: 
(1) one hour of debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
                                 <all>
```
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT AVTAR SINGH, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , JR . , Attorne y Ge ne ra l , R

e sponde n t . No. 10-72358 Age n c y No. A076-860-078 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Argue d a nd Subm itte d April 8, 2014 San Fran c isc o , C a lifornia B e fore : NOONAN, NGUYEN, a nd WATFORD, C i rc u it Judge s. 1. The B oa

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls (B IA) did not a b use its disc re tion in a ffirm ing the Im

m igration Judge ’ s disc re tiona ry de nia l of a sy lum . Substa ntia l e vide nc e supports the

c onc lusion tha

t Avta r Singh ha d e n ga ge d

in m arria ge fra

ud. Im m i gra tion fra

ud is a prope r c onside ra tion in a disc re tiona

ry de nia l of a sy lum . Hosse ini v . Gonzale

s , 471 F.3d 953, 957 (9th C ir. 2006). TheB IA prope rly 

# FIL E D APR 14 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public a t ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3.Pa ge 2 of 2

we ighe d this a dve rse fa c t or a longsidea ll othe r re le v an t c onside ra tions, inc luding fa vora ble fa c tors suc h

a s fa m ily re unific a tion. Se e K

alubi v . Ashc roft , 364 F.3d 1134, 1139 (9th C ir. 2004). Thede nia l is thus ne ithe r “ m a nife stly c ontra ry to the la w [nor] an a

buse of disc re tion.” 8 U.S.C . § 1252(b)(4)(D). 2. Singh’ s C onve ntion Aga inst Torture(C A T) c la im is m oot. The B IA gran te d Singh withholding of re m ova l, the broa de st re lie f that would beava ila ble to him unde r C AT. Se e 8 C .F.R . § 1208.16(c )(4). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE W DE NIE D.
1210-AB32-2-1342.html[7/26/2015 2:09:37 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvy-3l4e

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1838

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Leave my retirement up to me ,I earned it and it's mine to do as I have planned . Get out of my 401 !